UPDATE: JUNE 2016
This post, which is now over 6 years old, signifies my first flirtation with the STRAWMAN concept of personhood. I invite you instead to read a free copy (.pdf) of my new book, released June 17th, 2016, by going to this link –> StrawmanStory.info
I leave this post up for posterity, a glimpse into my own former ignorance, and wish readers to know that my knowledge has increased two-fold since this was written, and I do not, I repeat, do not in any way support the SPC or other commercial routes. Please read my book, for what is missing in this post.
Its title is: “STRAWMAN: The Real Story Of Your Artificial Person.”
When printed, the cover will look something like this:
≈
— This is an audio blog. Press play for my reading of this article —
≈
I’d like to tell you about a man named Joe…
I met Joe serendipitously via a forwarded email not too long ago, and contacted him shortly thereafter. It seemed as though Joe was having a few problems and complications while trying to be a free and sovereign man, as well as a “Secured Party Creditor“.
I met up with Joe for coffee just a few days later and found that we had much of the same information and shared many of the same values, including an urgent desire to be truly free human beings on this earth and within this once great country. Joe lives here in Salt Lake County, Utah part-time, part-time in Mobile, Alabama, and in China the rest of the time. Being fortunate enough to have traveled the world myself for a number of years, I have a good idea of what unique and wonderful cultures the Asian continent holds. And so as Joe argued that he likes to live in China most of the time simply because that so-called “Communist” country is 100 times more free than America, I wholeheartedly and sincerely had a difficult time disagreeing with him.
Now, this might seem to be the most ridiculous notion in the world to you, you who possibly have never traveled anywhere outside of these United prison States, and so have only the media as a reference to the illogical fallacies of America’s superior government and freedoms. But then, how could you possibly know that only about 200 of the well over 1 billion people we call collectively the Chinese are actually communists?
The wealthy government? Communist.
The people? Just regular people like you and me.
Do you think that because the Democratic Party (a private corporation) is in control of the United States government today and for the next couple of years, that all citizens of the United States are Democrats?
No. That would be a ridiculous and illogical fallacy based on no fact or scientific observation at all.
So then, do you think that because the Communist Party is in control of China’s government, that all Chinese people are Communists as well?
No. That would be a ridiculous and illogical fallacy based on no fact or scientific observation at all.
And come to think of it, how could you know that your U.S. constitution was suspended by the Act of April 9, 1933 by congressional approval and the declaration of emergency powers, and that all authority was handed over to the President of the United States, then one Franklin Delano Roosevelt? And how could you know that we are still living under that same declared state of emergency today? How indeed… The public school system certainly doesn’t teach us that now does it…
Read about it here: http://famguardian.org/Subjects/Scams/Articles/WarPowersAct.htm
≈
Bottom line:
“Supposedly, governments were invented to make human life easier and safer. But governments always end up enslaving humanity. That which we create to “serve” us ends up ruling us. The U.S. government by and for the people… now imprisons millions, takes half the national income by force, over-regulates, punishes, tortures, slaughters foreigners, invades countries, overthrows governments, imposes 700 imperialistic bases overseas, inflates the currency, and crashes future generations with massive debts. That which we create to serve us ends up ruling us. The problem with the “state as servant” thesis is that it is historically, completely false, both empirically and logically. The idea that states were voluntarily invented by citizens to enhance their own security is utterly untrue… The earliest governments and empires were in fact a ruling class of slave-hunters, who understood that because human beings could produce more than they consumed, they were worth hunting, capturing, breaking in, and owning… When cows are placed in very confining stalls, they beat their heads against the walls resulting in injuries and infections. Thus farmers now give them more room; not because they want to set their cows free, but rather because they want greater productivity and lower costs. The next stop after free-range is not freedom. The rise of state capitalism in the 19th century was actually the rise of free-range serfdom. Additional “liberties” were granted to the (human) livestock not with the goal of setting them free, but rather with the goal of increasing their productivity… When you look at a map of the world, you are not looking at countries, but farms. You are allowed certain liberties: limited property ownership, movement rights, freedom of association and occupation; not because your government approves of these rights in principle – since it constantly violates them – but rather because free-range livestock is so much cheaper to own, and so much more productive… State capitalism, socialism, communism, fascism, democracy… these are all livestock management approaches. Some work well for long periods… and some work very badly. They all fail eventually because it is immoral and irrational to treat human beings as livestock… Rulers have recognized that if they prevent you from fleeing the farm, you will become depressed, inert, and unproductive. A serf is the most productive when he imagines he is free. Thus your rulers must provide you the illusion of freedom in order to harvest you most effectively. Thus you are allowed to leave, but never to real freedom, only to another farm. Because the whole world is a farm. They will prevent you from taking a lot of money, they will bury you in endless paperwork, they will restrict your right to work… but you are “free” to leave. Due to these difficulties very few people do leave, but the illusion of mobility is maintained. If only 1 out of 1000 cows’ escape, but the illusion of escaping significantly raises the productivity for the remaining 999, it remains a net gain for the farmer. You are also kept on the farm through licensing. The most productive livestock are the (so-called educated) “professionals”. So the rulers fit them with an electronic dog collar called a license, which only allows them to practice their trade on their own farm. To further create the illusion of freedom, in certain farms the livestock are allowed to choose between a few farmers (politicians) that the investors present. At best they are given minor choices (votes) in how they are managed. (But) they are never given the choice to shut down the farm and be truly free. Government schools are indoctrination pens for livestock. They train children to “love the farm” and to fear true freedom and independence, and to attack anyone who questions the brutal reality of human ownership. Furthermore they create jobs for the intellectuals that state propaganda so relies on. The idea that democracy and some sort of social contract justifies the brutal exercise of violent power over billions is patently ridiculous. If you say to a slave that his ancestors “chose” slavery and therefore he is bound by their decisions, he will simply say ‘If slavery is a choice, then I choose not to be a slave.‘ This is the most frightening statement for the ruling classes, which is why they train their slaves to attack anyone who dares speak it. Statism is an ideology, and all ideologies are variations on human livestock management practices. Nationalism is pimped-out bigotry, designed to provoke a “Stockholm Syndrome” in the livestock… You do not have to be livestock. Take the red pill. Wake up…” —Stefan Molyneux
≈
Anyway, as we sipped our coffee, Joe and I began a long discussion about many things, and he thankfully filled in many pieces of the puzzle that I had been missing about the “Secure Party Creditor” issue and the many facets of being a creditor instead of a debtor.
And so, with the disclaimer that this is not legal or lawful advise (just covering my A$$) I am now going to share what I have learned. I recommend to everyone reading this to do your own research and verify everything I say here today. I would also highly recommend that you take my advice offered below, and go to your local “Justice Center” and sit in court as an observer. You will be amazed at what you see once you comprehend the following information…
≈
What Is My STRAWMAN?
≈
≈
Webster’s Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary defines the term “strawman” as:
1: a weak or imaginary opposition set up only to be easily confuted.
2: a person set up to serve as a cover for a usually questionable transaction.
≈
The Strawman can be summed up as an imaginary, passive stand-in for the real participant; a front; a blind; a person regarded as a nonentity. The Strawman is a “shadow,” a go-between.
≈
So let’s start off with a bit of background…
First, understand that the government is a collection of private corporations. Chances are you live in an incorporated municipality, nicknamed the “City” or the “Town” or the “Borough“, located within the “County”, which in turn is located within the “State”. This is the corporation acting as the “Government” of that “City“. For instance, I live in the Draper City Corporation, and around me are the Provo City Corporation and the Salt Lake City Corporation. These are the actual names of the “city” governments, called “incorporated municipalities”.
See a complete evidential examination of this corporate structure and its Comprehensive Annual Financial Reporting (CAFR) system in my documentary “The Corporation Nation” here: http://thecorporationnation.com/
The corporate municipality then creates De-Facto statutory code, for which they nickname “The Law“… though most of these codes are not actually congressionally approved law (approved by our so-called representative congressmen), but are instead what is called Prima Facie (presumed) law (legality), for which all citizens are required by the corporation they contract with to follow with their due consent. But legal corporate CODE is only statutory law if it receives the acquiescence (consent) of the governed. We, the People are the governed. Without our consent, the Prima Facie presumption of law (CODE) has no legal standing. It has no authority backing it up accept our agreement that it is law, since the consensual agreement by the governed makes the contractual aspect of the legality null and void if it is not consented to. While a legality/CODE may not always be lawful, law always trumps legality if consent is not given to the legality (presumed law).
Common Law, or Case Law, should be studied and understood. It is up to you to know this case-law, or at least the ones that apply to your specific case, so that it can be considered as common law. Why? Because U.S. CODE is 157 feet long in dozens of volumes, so no human being could possibly know the law (CODE)! So if you want common law to be considered in a court of law, you will have to research and present that case-law to the court yourself. The so-called judge (an attorney in a black moo-moo) has no legal requirement to introduce case-law (common law) into his own court regardless of whether or not it would prove your innocence, nor does the prosecuting attorney, and believe it or not, neither does your defending attorney (an agent of the court, not you)! This is why defending yourself with the knowledge of jurisdiction and common law is paramount. In other words, if you want the court and/or the jury (always request/demand a jury trial, lest the privately incorporated judge seal your fate) to consider actual law, you must be the one to introduce and ensure that this law is read in the court and duly registered as evidence of common (case) law.
The “municipality” then hires police officers to enforce all of these legal codes. These are called code-enforcement officers – a police man veiled in municipal corporate authority becomes a police officer – an officer of the municipal corporation. These “officers” work for the municipal corporation (city or town) you live in; a private corporate police force, enforcing the codes created by this private corporation, but not necessarily the common law. They have no requirement to protect and serve you or your neighbor’s constitutional rights (since you really have none in a corporate structure under a declared “state of emergency”), but they are required only to protect the continuity and CODE of the municipal corporation they serve. They are only there to help you to obey CITY, COUNTY, STATE, and U.S. CODE by fining and arresting you if you do not obey that CODE. These codes that I am referring to are all corporate codes, as all of these cities, counties, states, and the United States (Federal municipality, Washington D.C.) are also incorporated entities.
Though you may live in what is referred to as an unincorporated area, you are still within a county or state corporation, and part of THE UNITED STATES INCORPORATED, the corporate veil of artificial person-hood that is laying on top of and killing slowly the united states of America.
In an unincorporated area (a city or town that is not a municipal corporation) your law enforcement agency is the County Sheriff. This is why the County Sheriff is of such vital importance to any of the freedoms we still do enjoy, the only truly lawful representative (elected and approved by the people) of common law. Many elected sheriffs across the country though have sold out their people by assigning away that lawful right in lieu of Federal grants and United Nations treaties. Salt Lake County’s Sheriff Jim Winder is no exception. After being elected to a second term in office, he and the poisonous County Council dissolved the Sheriff’s department and created a private corporation called the “Unified Police District”, of which the elected Sheriff became the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of that now private incorporated police force. Counties across America are falling prey to this act of treason, loosing the last vestige of protection of their common law rights, and Salt Lake County is now literally a “police state”.
≈
Into The World We Are Berthed
≈
But for some real perspective, let’s go back even further, to the day you were born.
The collective corporation wastes no time in grabbing up its slaves and forcing them into indentured servitude as citizens. The seemingly harmless act of filling out a certificate of live birth ensures that you, a living breathing human being with a soul, are ushered into this corporate structure without any chance to challenge this action. Your parents have just signed their new born baby, birthed into the United States under Maritime Law and Universal Commercial Code (The Law Of The Sea) like a ship docking into the port of New York, over to the Federal Government by way of a Certificate of Live Birth. This contract places its listed contents (you) as property of the United States Government. You are born into servitude, and you are immediately considered to be collateral for the good faith and credit of the United States Government, U.S. INC. You are now part of the herd, a herd of human chattel, enslaved from inception. And you have just been veiled in an artificial person-hood; you have been incorporated and given a STRAWMAN corporate name similar to your human name.
Unfortunately, all you can do in response at that tender age is to burp and maybe wet yourself after a good cry!
Now, it is important to comprehend that all of this happened at an age before you, as a living free human being with a soul, had any way to read, comprehend (under-stand), acquiesce (consent), or sign (agree to in writing) this contractual incorporation of your legal person.
Consent cannot be lawfully given for any contract without full disclosure and acquiescence of said contract. This is basic, standard contract law. The state contracts with you anyway by way of its legal Prima Facie prerogative to do so, at the tender age of Zero. And so your parents signed ownership of you as a commodity over to the government without even realizing the fate they had just sealed for you as their parents had unwittingly done to them. They just signed away, without comprehension or acquiescence, their most prized possession to the state. And this is why the so-called government agency called “Child Protective Services” has the legal jurisdiction of acquiring your children at any time it sees fit. Your parents gave them that right at your birth, as you likely did or will do with your own children at their birth.
Of course, you can never retrieve your original Birth Certificate from the Federal Government. You can only request to acquire a certified copy of that document. The original is kept in the corporation called Washington D.C. (a private corporate “district” outside of the 50 states united) and used as collateral. You are that collateral, as the “attorney-in-fact” (representative) of that STRAWMAN trust, which is created under your “STRAWMAN” corporate name. This trust is accessed in times of corporate commerce, like when a loan, credit card, or contract is written in our STRAWMAN name.
My free name is Clint P Richardson.
My STRAWMAN name is CLINT P RICHARDSON.
All legal contracts will be in the all capital letter name, representing my corporate person, not me as a living breathing human being. Take a look at your driver’s license and any contracts you have and notice this all capital letter you.
I can talk about “Target” as the name of the physical building that houses the store that I am going to visit, but it’s true corporate name is TARGET CORPORATION.
≈
Ownership?
≈
Just like the Birth Certificate, anytime you “register” anything with the state, you are assigning ownership of that thing over to the state. This is why the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), through the private municipal code-enforcement police force, can take your vehicle at any time they see fit. Your consent was given for this as soon as you signed the authorized signature line of your registration forms. But even before that, you learned these codes set up by the state, and you acquired a license to drive, signing away your God-given common law right to travel in lieu of permission from the state to drive on the authorized signature line. That license gave your consent to the state, county, and municipal corporations to enforce those traffic codes upon you, as you are the carrier of your artificial person (STRAWMAN) – your corporate “person” – that you carry with you like a veil of invisible clothing. The word incorporate indeed stems from the Latin word corpus, meaning to veil something in artificial person-hood. This is what a corporation is: an artificial person, with 1st amendment rights of free speech due to precedent set by private corporate courts (the laughably titled Justice System) over the years.
So that I am making myself clear, the “Authorized Signature” line is on most contracts and even on your own personal or business checkbook. When they say, “sign on the dotted line”, they are referring to this “dotted” authorized signature line. But if we look closer, this is not a line at all. If you take a magnifying glass out and look at the line where you place your signature on your personal checks, you will discover a frightening surprise… That dotted line actually says:
…authorizedsignatureauthorizedsignatureautherizedsignature…
What does this mean?
By signing that line as a free and natural human being with a soul, you are authorizing your STRAWMAN corporate “person” to engage in commerce within the corporation, using Federal Reserve Notes out of your checking account.
What do Federal Reserve Notes have to do with this transaction?
Remember, when you were born, and then more importantly when you received a Social Security Number (SSN), you became collateral for the good faith and credit of the United States Government; for the corporation acting as the De Facto government.
De Facto means “in practice but not necessarily ordained by law” -or– “in practice or actuality, but without being officially established.” – For example: the people obey a contract as though there were a law enforcing it, yet there is no such law (only presumed law by consent of the two parties in the contract). This is our government… a corporation not allowed or not being operated under the jurisdiction of law, but only by its own legal CODE, of which requires the consent of the governed (the contracted citizens). These CODES are like the codes at your job: if you don’t like the rules, you quit.
De Jure means “what the law says” -or- “concerning the law”. It is the common, natural law and it is the basis of a constitutional republic. The original constitution for the united states of America was indeed a De Jure common law consensu al contract. But as we discussed earlier, that piece of paper was suspended and a fictional corporate constitution was enacted in its place by a dictatorial De Facto Executive government.
If you look at the back of your Social Security card (a unit of the International Monetary Fund – IMF) you will find a set of digits. These digits are different from the ones that make up your SS#. This one starts with a letter and is followed by 8 numbers instead of 9.
Now look at any $1 dollar bill…
Notice that the serial number that is on the front lower left side of that Federal Reserve Note has one letter and 8 numbers, followed by another letter. Drop the last letter, and you have a dollar bill whose serial number matches a Social Security (CUSIP) number for some STRAWMAN in the United States.
Your STRAWMAN trust is used as this collateral. This serial number represents the corporate trust account of your STRAWMAN that was set up when you were birthed into artificial person-hood, as accessed by your Social Security Number.
Since all contracts you sign on the authorized (STRAWMAN) signature line represent Federal Reserve Notes, and since all commerce you enter into is also using this debt money system, your are contracted with the state and its taxes by consent when using these “U.S. Dollars”.
When you go to a bank and sign a loan application, that application and the promissory note that you sign gets turned into money via the fractional reserve system. This is how new money is created. It is not money, in reality, but rather what is called “evidence of debt”. This simply means that each Federal Reserve Note, digital or paper, is the debt of the country. It must be paid back to the FED as this money was created or borrowed by the people (chattel). So instead of money, we carry around debt papers; I.O.U’s if you will, all representing one STRAWMAN or another…
Thus, since the (property) home or automobile you have purchased is with that newly created money out of your STRAWMAN trust account through the fractional reserve banking system, it is the property of the state!
It is important to understand here what the government has defined as “property”, and why it grants itself the authority to seize the property of any citizen who contracts with it:
“The ultimate ownership of all property is in the State; individual so-called “ownership” is only by virtue of government, i.e. law, amounting to mere user; and user must be in accordance with law and subordinate to the necessities of the State.” — Senate Document No. 43, 73D Congress, 1st Session, entitled: “Contracts Payable in Gold”, by George Cyrus Thorpe, submitted to the senate: April 17, 1933
This is a very revealing senatorial document. It sheds light on the concept of government and its requirement of permission and licenses. It also explains why all property must be registered with the state.
Who owns all property? Who owns the home and the land it sits on that you call your own? Who has the authority or permission to mortgage property?
“The money will be worth 100 cents on the dollar because it is backed by the credit of the Nation. It will represent a mortgage on all the homes and other property of all the people in the Nation.” –Congressman Patman, speaking from the Congressional Record of March 9, 1933, and referring to the Act of March 9, 1933.
≈
Do You Need A License Or Permit To Drive, Hunt, And Fish?
≈
According to the state, which holds your “STRAWMAN” in contract, you do, as you are the legal representative of that fictional “STRAWMAN” signing on the authorized signature line of all contracts.
Your contract (license and registration) with DMV is the very reason why you must obey the codes set up by the DMV.
And your hunting and fishing license is a contract in which you give up your natural and common law right to hunt and fish and instead accept not only the permission (permit), but all the legalities, limits, and seasons imposed by the state though that contract.
But what about my new friend Joe? Remember Joe?
Since Joe is a free man not driving but living and traveling on the land without intentionally being contracted with the private corporation we know as the De Facto government, he does not need a permit or license to do what free men like himself have the right to do.
This is the difference between a God-given right and a state-granted privilege.
Rights are foolishly and contractually given up for this state permission.
Traveling is a lawful term. Driving is a legal term.
Traveling is a right. Driving is a privilege.
But of course, the corporate De Facto police still harass and write citations for Joe, despite the fact that he has no license plate number or driver’s license number to reference on the ticket or citation, nor a permit number to reference for anything he does, like hunting and fishing. And so this is a real conundrum. For Joe is one of many thousands of brave individuals acting as free men (and women) across this once free country. And sadly, Joe has no support from the rest of the indentured slaves, who have come to value their particular brand of servitude under contract to the state. People – corporate persons – actually self-police their code-enforced society and turn in people like Joe to the code-enforcement officers as if he is breaking the law! This is only due to the fact that most corporate persons (citizens of UNITED STATES INC.) do not know what law is, because corporate government legality and CODES have been laid over the law; a thinly veiled yet heavily enforced set of rules that go against everything a free and constitutional society in a republic form of government should stand for.
They have been spun by the mainstream media, and even by much of the alternative media, that democracy is freedom. The word republic has long disappeared from public media discourse. Of course, since a republic ensures that all people are represented in government and in common law as free men, no matter how small the minority is – even a minority of one – a democracy ensures that a certain percent of the population up to 49.99% must submit to the will of the “vote” of the other 50.01%. So in a democracy, 1 – 50% of the people can have their rights taken away by the other half.
And this is called freedom?
Of course, these people who are on the legal majority side are the people who turn in other people for not obeying the legal CODES that they blindly follow, mistaking these legalities as laws. They vote what their media tells them. The minority, in this case Joe, is harassed, cursed, condemned, and cast out as insane. Thus, the democratic process is complete.
The republic for which Joe still stands will always be there though, despite the veil of corporate governance that has usurped the beauty of that free republic. And Joe will never give his consent to this democracy… the duped voting and consenting public who are strangled and blinded by their STRAWMAN.
≈
Joe Goes To Court!
≈
Now that we have a grasp on what the “STRAWMAN” is and that as contracted corporate persons we are conducting all business within this De Facto presumed law government, let’s talk about what a court is.
Courts are, surprise surprise… private corporations.
In California and some other states, through the freedom of information act, this is a proven reality. In fact, the judge is the owner of that court, rents that court out in an official capacity to the city, county, or state for a multi-million dollar lease, and even write checks on dummy accounts that are not registered with the IRS.
More on this here: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2010/12/18/the-united-states-a-corporation/
The private corporate court earns a percentage of the amount of money it collects in fines, and also receives kickbacks by placing citizens in prison or on probation. All prisoners are assigned a CUSIP number based on that prisoner’s STRAWMAN trust. This CUSIP # is then bundled up with other CUSIP numbers and sold as bundled securities on the securities markets. These are bundled persons. Prisoners are commodities for which the fruit of their labor is traded. This is why jails are overflowing, and why so many people get unsupervised probation for so many months. Probationary status is still a form of incarceration, and community service is often assigned. People on probation receive the CUSIP number as well, and are bundled just like the in-house prisoners.
Obviously, this is a racket! But as slaves of the corporation, used as chattel and collateral, we are subject to this tyranny by consent.
.
Read about the CUSIP here: http://www.sec.gov/answers/cusip.htm
and here: http://www.wariscrime.com/2008/11/07/news/how-illuminati-are-trading-prisoners-like-cattle/
.
But Joe is different…
Joe is a Secured Party Creditor.
A Secured Party Creditor is an official status as acquired by the UCC1 federal form available online or in any state government.
.
Download form here: http://www.sos.state.tx.us/ucc/uccforms.shtml (Texas)
–Or here: http://www.sec.state.vt.us/tutor/dobiz/ucc/ucchome.htm (Vermont)
–Or here: http://www.findlegalforms.com/forms/ucc-forms/ (All States)
Read about UCC Article 1 here: http://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/article1.htm
.
By simple definition, what is a Secured Party Creditor (SPC)?
Joe placed all of his valuables, including his home, land, automobiles, and other property of value (only property without liens) into SPC status. This simply means that Joe, at the signing of this UCC1 form, rescinded his contracts with the state and became the true owner of his own property. He went from being a debtor to the state (where the state owns his property and allows him to use his home and vehicle with permission and license after being registered to the state), to being a creditor for himself (where Joe legally and lawfully owns his property himself without the requirement to register it with the state or to get permission or license from the state to use and operate his own property).
So now, by owning the property listed in his Secured Party Creditor document, no contract is needed with the state in the form of a license to drive (Joe is traveling freely by law, not driving).
Joe has no driver’s license, no license plates, no registration, and no insurance.
Most of the enslaved debtor chattel would hear this and gasp, thinking that Joe is “getting away with something” here. That’s only because the enslaved masses have never truly met anyone that is actually responsible for his own actions, a truly free man on the land. Joe is not getting away with anything. Joe is taking the law into his own hands and squashing corporate legality under his big toe!
And since Joe has no driver’s license number, nor a license plate number, the police have a very tough time writing Joe an infraction (ticket). Since he is not operating within the vehicle code and is not able to be tracked by the DMV and legal system, cops get really confused. You see, cops do not know much about law. They only know CODE. And so when Joe comes traveling through their municipality with his homemade plates that say “Private Property, Not For Hire”, they have no reference point to justify a ticket. They get really confused and even angry without really knowing why. How can they write a ticket for breaking a legal code if a man is not bound or contracted to follow those codes? In escence, Joe is challenging their authority, and they don’t like that.
≈
[photo=https://realitybloger.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/plate-002_suburu.jpg]
≈
I accompanied Joe on one of his court dates in front of one of the most corrupt “Justice Courts” in the County of Salt Lake. This was the West Valley Justice Center, presided over by one Judge Keith Stoney, accused wife-beater. This guy looked and acted like an evil Dick Cheney, which is saying a lot. And, after watching several other cases before Joe where this fake judge stole hoards of cash in the 10’s of thousands from the people attending their court dates, and after actually hearing this crook say to one of the defendants as he slammed down his gavel in a fit of unholy rage and undue authority, “You owe me $900 dollars!”, the slick public prosecutor called for Joe.
Now, before the official court session was started, the bailiff announced to the courtroom to “all rise” for the honorable Judge Stoney, to which everyone in the courtroom acquiesced. That is, except for Joe and I. We remained seated, as we did not wish for the court to construe that we consent to or acknowledge the court’s or the judge’s jurisdiction or authority. This “judge” was neither honorable nor in a position of power over us, and our insolent act of remaining seated was the first step in acknowledgment of that fact. Every effort was made to never enter into any type of contract or admission of guilt or loss of authority. Joe is the authority over the judge, not the other way around. Only a jury of Joe’s peers in a common law court accepted by Joe can have that kind of authority. This was one of the purest acts of non-consent.
Joe, who has Multiple Sclerosis and uses two canes, was sitting in the front row of seats just outside of the “Bar”. The Bar is the wall (generally a wooden fence which may have a gate) between the seats in the courtroom and the actual court. Once you cross over the Bar from the seating section and into the court, you have just entered into a foreign land. This is the jurisdiction of Universal Commercial Code and Maritime Law, as represented by the war flag with gold fringe hanging in every courtroom. Crossing the Bar is the first step to loosing your common law rights; by leaving the constitutionally defined state‘s free land and lawful jurisdiction and entering into the court’s legal UCC jurisdiction.
Joe never crossed the Bar…
He told the judge that he could conduct himself in the seat that he was sitting in, and that getting up and entering into the court was too much of a hardship for his handicap. This was his angle; it was true, and it worked.
Judge Stoney, having previously received written Statements Of Notice from Joe that he would sue the judge for his bond if he proceeded in any unlawful and non-common law way with his case, considering that Joe was not contracted with the state, did not argue with Joe. Joe gave the judge an out, and the judge decided to take that out. All of this happened without even a spoken word, and without even the slightest clue of anyone else in that courtroom, attorney’s included. Because attorney’s don’t know law either, only corporate legality and CODE.
So Joe never really entered into the courts’ or the judges’ jurisdiction, either physically or verbally!
Note: Joe was making a “special appearance“, and definitely not a “general appearance“. Please research on your own what these terms mean. They may save your liberties some day:
“When a plaintiff sues a defendant, the plaintiff chooses the court in which to bring the suit. However, that court may not be able to exercise jurisdiction over a defendant. A special appearance provides a method for a defendant to contest a court’s jurisdiction over his person and property.” (Very important!!!)
“When a defendant makes a special appearance in court, he does not appear in the court, but stipulates that his appearance is strictly for the purpose of contesting the court’s personal jurisdiction over him. The defendant will be able to engage with the court in a debate over the validity of his contacts with the state, but he may not open any other subject or the court may consider him to be making a general appearance, and therefore subject to jurisdiction.”
“Courts have ruled that a general appearance by the defendant constitutes purposeful availment and thus justifies exercise of jurisdiction. A defendant makes a general appearance when he shows up in that forum state’s court for the purposes of answering the plaintiff’s claim. Because a general appearance indicates the defendant’s willingness to have the court adjudicate the dispute (and thus the defendant’s use of the benefits and protections of the state), making a general appearance in a state court will subject the defendant to personal jurisdiction in that state.”
—http://www.ehow.com/about_6623219_general-appearance-vs_-special-appearance.html
Note: This is where most people slip up, by accidentally entering into contract and jurisdiction with the court by agreeing with the judge about something. It could be the simple act of sitting down or taking off their hat when the judge asks them to, or answering to the STRAWMAN name without stating that you are not that corporate person, all of which can be legally construed as an acknowledgment of understanding (standing under) the judges authority and jurisdiction. Thus, the judge rules that their appearance is now a “general” one, and they are stuck in the courts jurisdiction. Be careful!!!
When asked for a plea, Joe said that he didn’t want to plea, and added for fun that he didn’t understand why he needed to.
Entering a plea is an admission of guilt… or it is an automatic ticket to a future trial with a not guilty plea. Either way, you would be in the courts jurisdiction through verbal or signed contract (plea). Some would choose to verbally state on the record that they are “innocent” in lieu of an official plea, referring to the common law constitutional coda that all men are innocent until proven guilty. But Joe simply did not enter a plea, which really makes it hard for the court to continue with its sham of justice.
Next, and this threw me for a loop until I figured out what he was doing, Joe became what I thought was a bumbling idiot… he kept saying that he didn’t understand anything that the judge was telling him. Over and over he stated this. And, after a few obviously half-assed attempts to have a normal court proceeding, the judge set a date for moderation, not trial.
Joe’s continuous response of “I don’t understand” was a well-played defense, and only two people in that courtroom knew what it meant – Joe and the judge!
By stating that he didn’t lawfully understand, Joe never entered into a verbal contract with the judge. He never accepted or acquiesced to anything that was said in that courtroom, making no verbal agreements.
You see… the word understand needs to be taken apart and examined before its true legal meaning can be comprehended.
To under-stand is really to stand under.
By stating that he understood anything that the judge said in that courtroom, Joe would have been stating that he stands under the courts authority and jurisdiction. This obviously means something totally different than it does in everyday conversational situations, and there is good reason for that…
For when a corporate code-enforcement officer arrests you and reads you your “Miranda” rights, the last statement he makes is, “Do you under stand these rights as I have read them to you?”
If you say yes, you have just verbally consented to stand under the authority of the corporation and its code for which this enforcement officer represents, and you have agreed to these so-called “rights” like, “Anything you say can and will be used against you”.
Why would you agree to that?
By saying that you don’t under stand, these rights can not be applied to you.
Some free men even go so far as to say that they “over stand” what the judge or police officer is saying, leaving no doubt for the record that their acquiescence and consent to the authority of the corporation is not forthcoming.
And so Joe never bowed to or acknowledged the authority of the court, and never stood under that authority.
When presented with paperwork to sign (an order to appear later), he signed his Secured Party Creditor name. But over the top of his signature he wrote the following statement:
“All Rights Reserved, Without Prejudice.”
This simple phrase does exactly what it says: it reserves all of your rights when you sign any agreement, traffic violation, or any other type of contract, private or public, and essentially makes the contract null and void at any time you so choose in the future. In other words, by signing “All Rights Reserved” you are retaining all of your common law rights that might otherwise be given away in that contract. And one of those rights is to not be bound by an unlawfully presented or later misrepresented contract that is unconstitutional or against your right of refusal. Adding “Without Prejudice” brings home the statement, reinforcing the fact that ALL rights are reserved, without exception.
Joe went to court the next day too, and he used the same language.
He got that case postponed for moderation, not trial as well!
Sadly, all of the other people in these courts admitted guilt 9 times out of 10. The court clerk even handed out papers that stated, “If you sign this, you are giving up your constitutional rights”. So before they even saw the judge, they had already marked the guilty or no contest box and signed their name on the Authorized Signature Line, meaning that they acknowledge that their STRAWMAN was guilty of breaking the CODES of the municipal corporation and that they would have to pay the fines, go to jail, or endure probation at the judge’s whim on behalf of their STRAWMAN. It was a sad thing to see, with so many uneducated people signing their rights away as if it was somehow lawful, or for that matter, normal.
It should be noted here as well that all of these people who showed up that day for traffic court were by default of their ignorance of the law making a “general appearance” and sealed this fate the second they signed that form.
≈
The Manufacturers Statement of Origin
≈
Now you may be wondering why Joe was able to just walk right out of that court without contract, without making a plea, and without being arrested.
Since most of these “violations” of CODE revolved around traffic rules and regulations of the VEHICLE CODE, let’s talk about what happens when an brand new automobile is purchased.
For new “vehicles” that are manufactured at the huge conglomerate auto-makers, a special title is created that will never be seen by the consumer who purchases that vehicle through STRAWMAN contract from the dealer. When a car, truck, or SUV is delivered to each dealer this title, called the Manufacturers Statement of Origin (MSO), is delivered along with it. This MSO is very much like a birth certificate, in the fact that it is never actually in the possession of the actual STRAWMAN who believes he or she is the owner of the property. When the vehicle is sold, the dealer is required by law (legal code) to send this MSO to the state, where it is digitally cataloged and destroyed. A few weeks later, a certified copy of the Certificate Of Title, never the original copy of the MSO, is sent to the human representing the STRAWMAN, listing him or her as the operator of that vehicle. But the MSO is always held by the state, making it the true property owner. It then grants permission to drive that vehicle to the corporate person, as stated above through licensing.
Sadly, since car dealers are corporations registered with the state themselves, and bound by state regulations and legalities in order to stay in business, they are required to send this MSO to the state government. If they do not, they will simply loose their license to do business in that state.
Now you might finally understand why all of the DMV and state paperwork is insistently done at the dealership, and why you must pay the filing fees on the spot, as a “tax”. This is, after all, very well organized crime we are talking about!
To bring this point home again, you are not the owner of your property, your home or vehicle. You are a tenant. You have permission to operate the state’s vehicle and live in the state’s home and on the state’s land. And the state may take its property at any time.
Ah, but that brings us back to our friend Joe and many more like him around the country and the world…
Since Joe is a Secured Party Creditor, Joe has taken ownership away from the state and placed it into his own trust through his UCC1 filing, and then notified the government of this fact multiple times. And because Joe has rescinded his driver’s license and removed the states license plates from his lawful property, he is now a traveler – free to lawfully travel on all public roads without the burdens and tyranny of legal CODE. With no license and no other contracts, the court and the evil Cheny-esque judge simply have no authority over Joe. He is not contracted with them. He is not bound by their CODES anymore. He is free from corporate legalities. And there is no jurisdiction over a free man without his consent.
But they still pull Joe over and harass him, of course. This can really be attributed back to the slave issue we spoke of above. The code-enforcement officers are the worst kind of slaves, because they steal the freedoms of and bash the heads in of other slaves without questioning why, sometimes enjoying the false power. They are what was once called the house-negro or the house-slave. Give even a conscious slave just a little bit of authority, and he will use that authority over the rest of the slaves just as harshly as his masters. This is the story of the largest and most violent street-gang in America… the collective Municipal Police Departments.
As an example of what this gang is capable of, Joe told me a story that quite frankly really got my goat. Because he didn’t like any of the local corporate churches masquerading as 501(c)3 non-profits – branches of the for-profit incorporated main church, very much like bank branches – Joe decided to build his own church on the vacant lot beside his house, on his own property.
After building and completing this church, he named it appropriately enough, “the unincorporated church of our Lord and savior“. Notice that the name of this church was not capitalized, because this church was not incorporated! But Joe didn’t request any permits or for that matter even notify the municipality (city) of his plans to build this unincorporated church on his own property. Since his home was now in his own Secured Party Creditor-ship, these codes that required a permit were lawfully and legally not applicable.
But when the city found out about this non-taxable, non-corporately controlled house of worship, they sent out the code-enforcement team which, without Joe’s consent, entered his private property and bulldozed his church down into a pile of unrecognizable refuse. They didn’t even remove the wreckage, just leaving it there as a reminder of Joe’s enslavement.
Joe was pretty sure that one or more of his neighbors had actually tattled on him, probably worried about their property values going down, which is the most ironic part of this story. The slaves that live in government-owned homes, who falsely believe in such a thing as property values more than personal liberty and freedom (and that their homes are even their own property), were the ones who self-policed themselves and instigated the tearing down of a house of worship.
This is a real eye-opener… I mean, how well do you know and trust your neighbors. If they watch shows like “Law and Order”, which has nothing to do with law or order, you may be their future victim!
I’d say that God’s Law was broken in a big way on this day.
≈
Some Dare Call It Anarchy!
≈
Now some might say that this freedom thing is akin to anarchy...
But again, this is an illogical fallacy, brought on by way too much TV. The unreasonable and illogical thought that freedom can only equate to anarchy is proof of the government’s propaganda machine in action.
When you as an American, who are used to the customs and traffic rules and regulations of this country, then travel to Europe, do you insist on driving on the right side of the road even though everyone else there drives on the left side of the road? No. You practice the customs of that society, being a responsible human. Do you murder, rape, and pillage while on safari in Africa in a small uncharted village just because there is no law or authority that says you can’t? The government and its police and armies might, but again, no you don’t. You enjoy the cultural beauty and freedom of an untarnished people free from the legal constraints of corporate CODE. And if you lived amongst these people, you would adapt to their ways in order to live together peaceably and for the benefit of the community.
We slaves are so afraid of freedom that we think it is the end of the world. We think that without legal CODE, we cannot have law.
But in truth, there is only one basic law. That law is commonly referred to as “God’s Law”.
God’s Law simply states that you should do no harm to other people or to the property they own. It’s that simple. That covers just about everything: rape, pillage, theft, murder, violence, persecution, slavery…
Everything else is CODE. And everything else is what is unfortunately not so commonly referred to as a “victimless crime”.
A victimless crime simply means that the particular CODE that was violated had nothing to do with God’s Law. So, no individual person was injured or killed, and/or no individual’s property was harmed or stolen. That covers most of the legalities, statutes, codes, signs, and other rules and regulations that are set in place by our legislators; our slave-masters. These include running a stop sign, smoking a joint, speeding, holding a sign up in a non-free-speech zone, assembling without a permit, walking your dog without a leash, selling flowers out of your home without a business license, walking across the street (jaywalking), panhandling, not paying unjust and un-apportioned taxes, driving without a license, etc. et infinite’…
Fines and fees for these “crimes” have become what the constitution defines as “unreasonable”, and more than most slaves can afford.
Our prison system is full of people who have committed victimless crimes. And as we have discussed above, this is by design. America houses 1 out of every 100 persons in this country in prison. And many more than that are on probation (jail at home). This is profitable beyond measure. There is a very good reason after all, that Dick Cheney and Halliburton got into the profitable private-prison business!
Read why slavery is legal in America through the legal system here: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2010/08/15/is-slavery-legal-in-america/
The worst part about this type of victimless crime is that you cannot face your accuser. There is no plaintiff! No one was injured, and no property was damaged, not even the state’s. The only person harmed is the corporation called government. Making an illegal u-turn is not part of God’s Law. There is no victim!
Note: When referring to “God” we are referring to the abstract concept that we as human beings with a soul answer to a higher authority than government. This is the basis for the freedom of religion. Your belief in God, whichever one of the 1000’s of God’s out there, is not necessary for religious freedom. Freedom of religion does not mean freedom of Christianity. Remember, all minorities, even religious ones, must have representation (protection) under a republic form of government. This is one of the most important constitutional (God-given) rights there is. And unfortunately, it is one of the most corporately abused, as a collective religious, non-profit crime syndicate.
Law is always a part of any society, be it through custom or common acquiescence. But only law – not the for-profit tyrannical codification of every facet of life.
And Joe would certainly agree!
≈
Accepted For Value (A4V)
≈
One last thing… Because we have been used as collateral for the credit and printing of Federal Reserve Notes in America without a real choice, you have the right of seeking a remedy for that use of your STRAWMAN’s trust fund.
Accepted For Value (A4V) is a term that describes the offsetting of a STRAWMAN’s debt. Your corporate person-hood, your STRAWMAN, is where all of your contracts and debts are assigned. They are attached to your Social Security Number; your slave number. They are not attached to you as a living breathing human being with a soul. It is very important to distinguish between the two.
Our friend Joe has been successfully using A4V to pay such things as property taxes, loans payments, and other debts for many, many years. Others have used it for student loans, home payments, credit card payments, and many other types of loans and monetary contracts.
Here’s a simple explanation of how it works:
Step 1) You receive a bill from a corporation. (This is not to be used for purchases!) All businesses are incorporated in some form, and are conducting contractual commerce with your STRAWMAN. Otherwise, YOU would not be receiving a bill.
Step 2) You turn that bill (debit) into a check (credit) by stamping accepted for value in red, and signing in blue. (Seek experienced instruction, as this has to be done exactly right.) If you look at a bill that you have received from a corporation and then set it side by side with a paycheck that you receive from the corporation that you work at, you will see that they are set up in very much the same way. The top 2/3 of the bill is an explanation of what is being charged, and the bottom 1/3 is a debit in the form of a “payment stub”. But the paycheck is exactly the same, accept that the top part is an itemization of gross payment, taxes, and net income, and the bottom portion is a credit in the form of a check payable to you from the corporation. By following exacting instruction, you are simply changing that bill (the debit payment stub) into a check (a credit from your STRAWMAN trust account)… Accepted For Value is stamped across the bill, your SS# without dashes, your SS# with dashes, Your STRAWMAN name, your human name, and finally your signature in blue ink (not necessarily in that order).
Step 3) You send that bill, now an accepted for value check, into the IRS. The IRS is backed up with A4V claims, as many folks are now comprehending what I am telling you here.
Step 4) After this A4V is finally processed, the debit is taken from your STRAWMAN “trust account” as human collateral (chattel) and sent as a credit (a check from the IRS) to the corporation that sent you the bill in the first place.
Step 5) That corporation cashes the check (credit) to pay off your STRAWMAN’s original debt, your debt to that creditor has now been offset.
Now, understand that the IRS is actually happy to do this because it just created credit money into the economy instead of debt money. It accessed the money in your trust without having to rely on a bank to create a note. And as I understand it, it cannot access this trust account any other way.
This works for anything as far as I can tell, but it cannot be used to purchase items. This is to offset already assigned and existing debt. So going out and purchasing a $100,000 car and then trying to pay the car off in a month or two could be considered a misuse of this remedy. This is not for stupid or greedy people. This is for people who wish to save their homes from greedy banks. This is for people that are honestly seeking a remedy for the ridiculous costs of higher education. This is for people who fell for the bank and credit industry’s usurious predatory methods to trap them in high interest credit cards and collateralized loans with no other way out. This is not so that you can buy a new BMW and pay it off in a month. Those idiots who can’t comprehend justice and remedy, let alone responsibility, are doomed to become a victim of their own greed, and will joyfully be able to visit the rest of the victimless criminals in prison.
If this doesn’t make sense to you, then think of it this way…
What do you think happens when you declare bankruptcy? Only incorporated entities can declare bankruptcy. What do you think is happening when you make this declaration? You are declaring that your STRAWMAN corporation is so far in debt that you as the caretaker of that corporation cannot any longer pay that debt. So you are offsetting all of that debt attached to your corporation and starting over with a clean slate. Do you think these companies are loosing money because you declare bankruptcy? Of course not. They don’t care one way or the other. Whether they write off the debt or collect the debt, they will still make their money. And by the time they add fees, late fees, transfer fees, 3 month collection fees, interest fees, and any other type of fee they can imagine, they end up making more off of a charged-off account than they do in a successful collection.
This is the unethical UCC form of business that has engulfed our world. It is not pretty. It is not nice. In fact it is pure evil. But as long as it is in place, you may as well know what your defenses and remedies are for being forced to live in it.
For a more detailed look at A4V and STRAWMAN issues, go to the following sites:
http://www.nomoredebt.cc/hjr192.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pByZmACuIAk
http://www.creditorsincommerce.com/
http://www.myprivateaudio.com/
≈
Conclusion…
≈
After many encounters with different folks who are walking the walk in the Secure Party Creditor/Free Man/Sovereignty movement, I am sorry to say that this is not a figment of my imagination. I hope that somehow a support group can be started so that all of these people from across the country, who are each using only parts of the whole puzzle, can come together and create a definitive collection of legal remedies for this seemingly endless maze of a legal mess. And I hope that whoever does this isn’t just trying to make a buck. There is nothing worse in my eyes than a patriot for profit. I hope that this writing helps all who wish to understand the veil of fiction that has been pinned to us all since birth. May your journey be filled with brighter days…
Once again, please do not attempt any of this on just my writing here. This is something that should be studied and perfected before taking the plunge. This is only an attempt to put into basic comprehension what is otherwise a bailiwick of legalese and international enslavement.
And oh, if I have any of this wrong, please don’t hesitate to comment below, so that all can learn from the more astute among us. Mine is only to conceptualize the system, not to spear at the heart.
Or maybe this will help:
.
–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
Monday, March 14, 2011
Rich
/ March 18, 2011Great article, Clint!! You certainly have a way with words that lets the uninformed become informed instead of thoroughly confused.
I have read that you can acquire the MCO for a NEW car, truck etc. if you pay cash. I believe that the dealer only has to send the MCO to the DMV if the car is being financed. Cash is king!!
LikeLike
realitybloger
/ March 19, 2011Not sure about just cash… I think that you have to tell the dealer that you will be taking the car abroad. That way, the MSO can be transferred out of country, and so the dealer will give it to you. Don’t think just cash will do the trick. I think it is law that the dealer do this.
Thanks… -Clint-
LikeLike
Brian
/ October 9, 2011I have read, in Bob Plimpton’s book, that you CAN acquire the MCO if you pay in cash AND tell them that you will be taking the auto to a DIFFERENT state. (No need to imply that you are going to a different country), just a different state!
LikeLike
suedenimon
/ April 3, 2011Excellent part two Clint, thank you for taking the time and having the talent to put so much information so succinctly and in such an easily understood (should I say that ever again?) way!
A difficult and LARGE subject cut down to size!
LikeLike
x251kx
/ June 20, 2011everything was brilliantly put together and enlightening. Great work! as a newbie to all this i was a little confused about accessing your STRAWMAN account, because if you access it doesn’t that mean you are acknowledging the contract that your birth certificate and S.S. number was issued on? and thereby giving consent? again i am well aware that much more research on my behalf is required.. just something that was on my mind. i am a firm believer that we as a people will all be free one day.. and very soon at that!
LikeLike
Veronica
/ June 23, 2011There is a subtle difference between ‘engaging in commercial activity’ and ‘labouring as a workman”. The most important thing to understand is that the term ‘commercial activity’ is a created term governed by the Law Merchant (lex mercatoria). Using the customs and usage’s from that law is what determines whether you are in ‘their’ activity or not. Such as commercial instruments, a business license, profit and loss records, balance sheets, advertising, receipts, business cards, insurance policies, social security numbers, drivers license, commercial speech, extended credit, limited liability, free mail service, ownership, etc. The use of such modes and instruments makes you subject to the Uniform Commercial Code (a private copyrighted ‘law’ by the American Law Institute).
http://ecclesia.org/truth/workman.html
LikeLike
David
/ August 7, 2011Hi Clint,
I just wanted to tell you that your threads are by far, the best, the most detailed, the easiest to comprehend, of any and all websites out there dealing with like-minded material. You are awesome!
Question; Can you, or can you lead me to a site or group/individual
that can give an assist with identifying the bonding company/policy #
on Officials’ bonds who have damaged me big time, and for which I’m looking to create remedy for their malfeasance, wrongdoing, and operating well beyond the limitations of their Oaths of Office and
Public Hazard Liability Insurance. If you are familiar w/ this process
and available to give an assist, please let me know what your fee
might be, so I can create the remedy. I have good and complete
commercial paperwork and proper SPC/UCC-1 standing to proceed.
Thanks,
David
LikeLike
realitybloger
/ August 14, 2011Hey David,
I’m sorry I haven’t gotten back to you. I am trying to get in touch with an acquaintance that has all of that information. Will let you know…
-Clint
LikeLike
Brian
/ October 9, 2011Clint,
I, too, would thoroughly enjoy getting that info, as I would also like to file a Negative Averment and other documents, against corrupt public servants who violoate my unalienable rights to life, liberty and property! Thanks for all your wonderful words in these blogposts, that I just recently been blessed with receiving! Peace and love to you and yours, brother!
Sincerely,
Brian
LikeLike
realitybloger
/ October 9, 2011Am compiling a download now. Will let you know when it is available.
-Clint-
LikeLike
Dave
/ July 19, 2013no prob take your time this information is very valuable to me, thank you
LikeLike
SamO
/ September 17, 2012“”””Question; Can you, or can you lead me to a site or group/individual
that can give an assist with identifying the bonding company/policy #
on Officials’ bonds who have damaged me big time, and for which I’m looking to create remedy for their malfeasance, wrongdoing, and operating well beyond the limitations of their Oaths of Office”””
All of these documents are Public Record and should be fled with the Register of Deeds for your county, if they are local officials.
You should also write the official themselves and tell them to send you the information. If they refuse, you have still obtained evidence of good faith on your part, and bad faith on theirs.
Some states may be different than mine, so if they are not at the Register of deeds office check the CODES for the state, or contact the county executive for the information
LikeLike
Cynthia K. Gibb
/ August 11, 20118/11/2011
Dear Mr. Richardson:
Thank you so much for the additional information. I’ll be reading for quite some time. I have three comments on the data I have digested so far. With regard to the signature line on my checks, my little magnifier is not strong enough to tell what it may state. The line does look slightly different from the other lines, but I will have to locate a stronger glass to validate the statement. In respect to my SS card, the only number on the reverse is a Form OA-702 (4-76), but later cards may be different. Also, with regard to the dollar bill, if you delete the ending letter, and do not count the beginning letter, there are only 8 numbers. As far as I know, any SS number I have ever seen has 9 digits. I will keep researching! Cindy Gibb
LikeLike
Steven
/ July 7, 2012I do see the authorizedsignature on my checks with a strong magnifying glass but I too do not have any number on the backside of my SS card except the form #.
LikeLike
mark
/ November 12, 2012I lost my original in a fire….the older ones don’t have the cusip number. my replacement card does.
LikeLike
Tommy
/ November 13, 2012All SS# cards issued after 1999 have the cusip # on the back in red: L 12345678
LikeLike
Zach
/ August 24, 2011I have just finished reading parts 1 and 2 of your STRAWMAN blog, and must say that I’m exceedingly happy to have found them. Over the past couple of years, I’ve been in an ever-accelerating process of waking up. I originally heard/read about the STRAWMAN a year or two ago, but didn’t quite comprehend the gravity or ramifications of it until recently. So, needless to say, I’m quite new to the scene and have LOTS of learning to do before I proceed with anything.
I do have a couple of quick questions, which I intend to formulate in a way that will elicit quick responses… I know you have better things to do than spend a bunch of time on a response to a newbie like me.
1. Where is a good place to begin my research? There’s so much to learn, and I don’t want to get too frazzled by starting with things that are too far over my head.
2. I’m trying to wrap my mind around the process of obtaining true ownership of property… with specific regard to vehicle ownership. I purchased (financed) a car a year and a half ago and still have a couple years’ worth of payments left. My main goal is NOT to get out of the “loan”, but to ensure that I will be able to truly OWN the vehicle. Will I have to pay off the car completely before this can be accomplished? Did I doom myself by entering into a contract with the bank?
LikeLike
realitybloger
/ August 27, 2011Hmmm…. I’d say that for primary research, start reading U.S.CODE. Jordan Maxwell has mass amounts of info, as well as some of the links in this article and Part 1.
But this is also a compendium in logic and reason, so research is only part of it. Corporate person-hood is as old as the gods. The truly hard part is un-educating yourself from what you have learned from school and media. Cognitive dissonance will be your biggest enemy until you acknowledge it.
As for the car, nothing is yours if there is a contract and a lien. Property ownership is a bit of an illusion, obviously, but allodial title is something to check out (land). All traffic laws are consensual, and that is where your power lays. Honestly, the real trick for the new car would be to get the original title by paying cash and stating to the dealer that you are shipping the car overseas and need them not to sent the original title to the government. If they don’t hold that, they have no proof of claim that they own your title. Used cars are lost forever, me thinks, as they are already registered (owned) by the state.
But again, non-consent is the key for your situation. Police are a private corporate gang with no authority except what you give them… with the exception of harming a people or their property.
LikeLike
SamO
/ September 17, 2012For a used car, get the Cert. of Title, write scrapped on it, and send it to the state. They will clear it from their systems and all “evidence” of title will be removed from the states records.
LikeLike
Machael
/ September 20, 2011Hi Clint,
Awesome Blog, I have been learning about Sovereignty for about 3 years now and I love how you explain things even though I know about what you stated, I love hearing reminders and different people’s point of view. My only criticism is to not refer to a natural person or a living man or woman as a human being. According to Black’s Law it says to See Monster as the definition.
But, other than that everything was on point my friend. 🙂
LikeLike
Steven
/ July 7, 2012I don’t find “human being” defined in the Blacks Law Dictionary Seventh Edition, or the word Monster.
LikeLike
realitybloger
/ July 7, 2012I believe this is referencing “people” who are not “persons – citizens”. They are free men who are not under the control of government. Human Being is the natural state of man without debt and servitude.
And if I’m not mistaken, it is in much older versions of law dictionaries.
LikeLike
Osker Wize
/ November 13, 2011Have you presented yourself as a sovereign in court and dismissed any case against you?
LikeLike
realitybloger
/ November 13, 2011No sir… a good sovereign doesn’t generally need to appear.
By signing a notice to appear with written non-consent, non-understanding, and under duress(written on the ticket), one only need send that ticket back into the office of assignment as not interested in contracting at this time, and some include a fee schedule.
Avoiding court all together, or the contract to appear in the corporate court, is the key.
Will be posting info on this soon… lots of it!
LikeLike
Osker Wize
/ November 13, 2011How do I do that for a trial coming up in two weeks for an alleged crime that I did not commit?
LikeLike
RealityBloger
/ December 13, 2011Sorry my friend, as I did not see your response until today…
I’d be glad to send you tomes of information on this subject, just shoot me an email at clint@cafr1.com
But understand, I give no legal advise, just passing on information from others that has worked for them.
Hope your case worked out.
-Clint-
LikeLike
einten
/ June 2, 2014Thank you Clint for pt 1+2 articles as these are so informative.
Do you have contact details for support people and resources in New Zealand as I know the UCC code is international and all of what you convey applies around the world however there are differences here as we are not a republic and in terms of the paperwork submission requirements and addressing specific coding/ acts which are not laws but they try to trump UCC with their corp fiction bs etc. Thank you.
LikeLike
Neo
/ December 18, 2011For newbies, This guy explains it better than I ever could.
Side by side columns: The Republic vs THE CORPORATION
http://www.usavsus.info/ Take the blue pill and ignore this and everything in your life will stay the same, take the RED PILL and open this, and the truth will be revealed to you and there will be no going back, it is your choice, your free will. But anyone reading this site has already taken the RED PILL.
LikeLike
Y.Y.
/ December 29, 2011Dear Clint,
Thank you so much! Where can I find accurate detailed instructions on acquiring a Security Party Creditor status. A service that doesn’t make you pay a leg and an arm. Why do people charge so much for life-saving information?
LikeLike
realitybloger
/ January 6, 2012Depending on the state you live, it is a legal document. Just do a search and it will come up under state forms/documents.
Unfortunately, there are many who see these things as opportunity to profit, and they are simply victims of usury and its stranglehold. Patriots for profit disgust me…
-Clint-
LikeLike
Y.Y.
/ January 6, 2012Thank you Clint. Since I want to do the Redemption process immediately, I’m considering RedemptionService.com. Are they legit? Do you know of any legit services that are fair and have quality service?
LikeLike
Tracey Deloria
/ January 15, 2012THIS IS A GREAT PREFACE FOR THOSE SEEKING VERIFICATION/CONFIRMATION OF THE REDEMPTION PROCESS.
NEXT GO LISTEN TO BRANDON ADAMS AT CREDITORS IN COMMERCE- ,,,,A COUPLE OF FREE 3-DAY,TIM TURNER SEMINARS ON YOUTUBE ., PUT THE DAYS IN. REALLY UNDERSTAND WHO YOU ARE SO THEY CANT PUSH YOU OFF THAT ROCK! LETTING SOMEONE DO THE PAPERWORK FOR YOU IS LEAVING YOU ON THE SIDE OF A MOUNTAIN THAT YOU HAVE NO IDEA HOW YOU GOT THERE! GREAT WORK CLINT,THANX…
LikeLike
Y.Y.
/ January 17, 2012Thank you Tracey!
LikeLike
Bill Deberg
/ January 20, 2012I looked all over the IRS website for info on A4V filing or claims and found nothing. Are you sure this is something that the IRS will actually process?
LikeLike
realitybloger
/ January 20, 2012I know people that have been doing it for years. I cannot offer advice on this, only to say that it works for some and not for others.
This is not the route I choose to follow. But then I’m not in debt.
LikeLike
Bill Deberg
/ January 24, 2012So, do you have to go through the UCC thing and becoming a sovereign person prior to utilizing the A4V?
BTW Clint….your blog rocks. I got hooked on you after hearing your interviews with Jan Irvin on Gnostic Media. I’m glad there are true patriots out there like yourself. Keep up the incredible work.
LikeLike
pam mattoz/ ron stephens
/ February 24, 2012Hello Clint;
My name is ron and a friend of pam that you have had contact with via email. I am using her computer.
My question is: If I go to court again GOD forbid,when they call me forward I will say, with due respect to your court sir I wish to answer your questions from here. Why? because I do not consent to entering the domaim of maritime law we are not on the high seas. Iam a living man with a soul that lives under natural and common laws.my plea- i wish not to enter a plea. No sir I donot fully understan why i smust enter your couts domain. etc—————— . what will happen to me ?
LikeLike
realitybloger
/ February 24, 2012The court has no jurisdiction but for what you give it. And I don’t think anyone should be going to court in the first place. This is not legal advice. I suggest getting to know the gentleman who makes these videos:
onlyfreemen.com
http://www.youtube.com/user/donotconsent83?ob=0&feature=results_main
-Clint-
LikeLike
Val Glemser
/ March 30, 2012good luck in getting the proper papers filed ! I have tried in 2 states, they both refused to accept them. Got ideas for somewhere that will accept them ? The states are arizona and colorado.
LikeLike
realitybloger
/ March 30, 2012What papers are you referring to?
LikeLike
Joe
/ May 23, 2012I had a similar issue. They rejected on the grounds that “the debtor and secured party are the same person” (a common reply). I sent the filing back with a cover letter stating that I (the creditor) am a homo sapien and that the straw man (debtor) is a straminius homo and challenged them to produce the straw man (debtor). They accepted my filing.
LikeLike
John
/ May 29, 2012Clint, I couldn’t find a link to download the mp3 of Strawman_2, Would you email or point me to a link?
LikeLike
realitybloger
/ May 29, 2012[audio src="https://realitybloger.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/killingyourstrawman_2.mp3" /]
Hope it was worth the wait!
LikeLike
Share
/ June 3, 2012Can u fill out the info without your original BC
LikeLike
quadul blackstone
/ June 13, 2012i have commercial drivers liscense can i still do the process n keep my DL or what options do i have so i can keep driving for a living
LikeLike
realitybloger
/ June 14, 2012A driver’s license is just a contract. It is like a social security card. You do not have to use it, just because you have it. “Driving” for work that requires the license is a contractual state of employment. This does not mean that you must have a license to “travel” in the rest of your non-employment based life, for your personal auto. But, of course, you must face the possible consequences of having that license revoked when traveling without it. This is a personal choice.
The alternative…
When I receive a ticket, I refuse to sign it. When they say I must or I’ll be taken to jail, I am then forced under duress to sign the contract (ticket). Therefore, I write “Signed under duress, I do not understand, I do not consent, this is not a contract, Clint Richardson (signature), (below) without prejudice”.
I do not accept the contract (ticket). Therefore I send it back to the corporation that assigned it with a nice thanks but no thanks letter.
LikeLike
quadul blackstone
/ June 17, 2012thanks clint
LikeLike
Daniel
/ January 15, 2013Hey Clint, Thanks for all the info, 1 question.. do I need to have the ucc-1 filed and accepted before I can go to court as a “special appearance”?
So in other words, can I stay out of the bar area and not understand etc… before filing the ucc-1?
LikeLike
realitybloger
/ January 16, 2013A special appearance is a product of the legal system, and so anyone can declare as such their appearance to be “special” instead of “general”. This is part of court procedures.
The UCC is not necessary.
But I reemphasize that the real goal is to stay out of court, and to conduct business (commerce) with the court through certified, registered mail. Remember the notary public is your very own court. A special appearance would be toward the end of this process, and if caught in court, demand a grand jury so as not to be at the whim of the court.
-Clint-
LikeLike
Rasheen Townsend
/ June 15, 2012Hello Clint my name is Rasheen your info is very valuable, I’ve been studying about the STRAWMAN since last year and lets just say my eyes are finally open, I plan on doing this also but not until I learn a lot more, so thanks a lot for the info.
LikeLike
Emily H
/ July 1, 2012Clint, please learn to properly spell “losing”. It isn’t “loosing” as you keep spelling it. There is no such word. “Loose” for example might describe clothes that are not tight fitting. Otherwise you generally seem to be a quick study on being sovereign and your blog was enjoyable to read,
LikeLike
mark
/ November 12, 2012You forgot the “,” before and after the words “for example”, but that’s ok, we love you anyway.
LikeLike
James Farrell
/ July 9, 2012emily, please learn to not focus on trivial stuff like the proper spelling of “losing”, you might learn more, and would be a much less irritating person. clint richardson is a brilliant man, and a better American Patriot!
LikeLike
Paul
/ July 12, 2012Good Afternoon,
When it comes to A4V, how would one go about checking with the Feds to see what was drawn out or deposited into your account?
LikeLike
realitybloger
/ July 13, 2012I would say one wouldn’t… But I’m not sure.
Remember, A4V is what banks do when you give them a signed loan contract. They accept that contract for value and monetize it on your behalf. You create the money, it is deposited in the bank, and then given back to you, leaving the bank at a zero balance. The whole mortgage industry is a fraud – as principle and interest payments are pure profit for the banks. It is actually against the law to loan you the deposits of their other customers (deposits).
As for your personal experience with A4V, it seems to be hit or miss. And I would defer you to someone else to get that information. I say don’t go into debt in the first place… and if you already are, make the bank prove that they loaned you any of their own money or nullify your “contract” with them!
-Clint-
LikeLike
Rufus Writerman Nelson
/ July 17, 2012Thank you Clint. I’ve been looking into this for about a month and with so much being thrown at me i was starting to feel like this is all just one big trap to get money, but not anymore. I’ve felt it my whole life, why do i work for paper? Why do i need to be in debt to live? Why does everything that is ‘needed’ become so expensive? The more i look the more i see, and it seems that this UCC1 may well be my start on the path to seperation. I only wish to ask did you Clint fill out a UCC1 And a UCC3 and if you did, how has it worked for you?
LikeLike
realitybloger
/ July 17, 2012I made a conscious choice to be free of debt and property. I own nothing (except personal belongings – but also know that those can be taken by an army small or large, and so i don’t kid myself there.)
Since I wrote these articles, I have been researching much deeper and have found that because all law is contract law, I choose to now not contract. Instead I will be documenting my rescinding of citizenship in the future and will do everything in common law contract.
I am also starting a consulting business so that I and a partner can do the same for others. This too will be through private contract with services payable by gold or silver.
In short, I am making the conscious decision not to participate in their system of legal code (public policy) and instead only communicate and deal with government when necessary under common law contract.
To really hit this home, I’ve discovered that these remedies are in the legal realm. I will never again go to court unless under force, thus court is a fraud if I have to go. If I want to sue an individual, I will sue him, not his strawman. In other words, if a cop harasses or violates my rights, I’ll put a lien on his home and property. All of this is done outside of court, and the only way for that cop of government person tp challenge my taking of his property is to challenge eme in court. Since I am now being challenged, the case will still never reach a legal court setting, as I will always demand a grand jury of the people in common law. I’ll never let a judge decide my fate again, unless I am forced.
I am poor, happy, and do not own or want to own property. Land, maybe. But only in common law.
-Clint-
LikeLiked by 1 person
Paro7
/ July 30, 2012All the people I talk to about My Strawman Think I mad
I think you are brilliant Dose that mean that you are mad too
LikeLike
realitybloger
/ July 30, 2012I am not what people think, I am what I think.
And so are you…
LikeLike
Paro7
/ August 1, 2012All of the info here is good, a lot of time must have went into it.
I hope you wont mind me putting some of into a book
Called the escape from the GOST Ship ( Not misspelled )
Or Im off the HOLODECK (Star-trek) if you have any success stories that I might add.
Please anyone out here that has any success with abatement.
or commercial liens I would be most interested in.
ALL there is to be a Sovereign IS TO BE ONE.
The rest will follow.
Thank you for confirming all that I know to be true. unfortunately there is a lot more to learn
My E-Mail pmtr@eircom.net
LikeLike
shannon
/ September 23, 2012how do i kill my strawman and become a human again
LikeLike
Marvin Stafford
/ October 19, 2012great stuff! you have filled in a lot of blanks for me. thank you any help is appreciated. my only criticism would be that you never touch on the fact that when congress does things like these, it is the DUTY of the citizens to rectify them. too many people are assuming these rights and freedoms are thiers by choice, and that they can choose whether or not to keeps them. these things are ours by birth, gifted us by our forefathers. the freedoms many seek to give up belong to our children and their children, none of us have the authority to give them up. every day we postpone, our DUTY becomes that much more difficult and costly.
LikeLike
jan
/ October 20, 2012So if clint richardson was teaching us a very dangerous way of redemption, what is the proper safe way ? And If redemption through UCC1 isn’t the way because its still a contract with the government, then how do we even begin to learn the proper way of redemption of our “STRAWMAN” ???
LikeLike
Jan
/ October 25, 2012Never mind I did further research & answered my own questions. Thanx.
LikeLike
Zay
/ May 19, 2015Would you mind elaborating more on you stumbled across?
LikeLike
pj from california
/ November 8, 2012Very informative and helped this reader see the forest beyond the tree. Fear of authority is simply fear of the unknown. Like many I have heard of our “STRAWMEN” but could not fully see it until I stumbled across your blog. Thank you for putting this information out there, I will definitely continue my own research.
LikeLike
Karl Schmidt
/ November 27, 2012This is a very good source for landowners to help them keep their property by PATENT and other informative filings http://www.narlo.org/
LikeLike
Karl Schmidt
/ November 27, 2012….also , ONE THE BEST BOOKS I’ve ever read , when I read this book, a feeling of AWE came over me after reading her work, God love her, she is truly a light and blessing to us waking up ! Her name is Mary Elizabeth Croft , her book : HOW I CLOBBERED
EVERY BUREAUCRATIC
CASH-CONFISCATORY AGENCY
KNOWN TO MAN
… a Spiritual Economics Book
on $$$ and
Remembering Who You Are
by:
Mary Elizabeth: Croft @
http://api.ning.com/files/O3bQkEr8R3QxE-CSQyWiSpQbkATPds4hegRjs6Ddl-
LikeLike
Brian Mazzola
/ January 27, 2013Im interested in A4V my Mom is losing her house after my fathers passing and i wanted to know if she could save it that way.
LikeLike
realitybloger
/ January 27, 2013I’ve no advice to give on that subject – the A4V.
However, I can help with the correct process for her protection – the legal response that is.
-Clint-
LikeLike
James Farrell
/ January 28, 2013clint, what is your best info on fighting foreclosure/eviction with the legal response? i’ve heard some unorthodox info from gordon hall’s “contracts in motion” show on talkshoe.com. i think you’d be intrigued big time. as you already know with all your cafr work, truth is wilder than fiction! my email is jdfarrell45@yahoo.com, and i love your work, it is top notch! may God bless you!
LikeLike
Streets of Love - unconventional
/ February 17, 2013Reblogged this on Streets of Love – unconventional.
LikeLike
Kellie
/ March 27, 2013Does the IRS send you a receipt when it’s paid? How do you know when it’s paid? How long does the A4V process take? Thank you for all of this information. Hungry for more
LikeLike
realitybloger
/ March 28, 2013Thanks for the questions, Kellie. I chose not to go that route myself, as it does not take you out of government but into UCC.
Many others who are SPC can help you, but I myself will never be an artificial person again.
-Clint-
LikeLike
John
/ May 8, 2013Clint,
What are your thoughts about the recent OPPT Movement ?
LikeLike
realitybloger
/ May 8, 2013Well, I saw the legal documents that pertained to the establishment of the “trust” in question, and I was astounded. It included a blood oath, usually reserved for Masons and Mormons. It is legal, meaning it is artificial – and would be worthless without the current tyrannical government we have to uphold the trust.
Leaving one government or trust of contract by escaping into another one is not reasonable or logical.
A free man does not contract his natural rights away for political ones under any circumstances.
Creating a trust or other government by incorporating under the current world/international government law does not make you any less of a subject of the powers that be, though they may allow you to think so.
Just my opinion…
-Clint-
LikeLike
DeMarco Davis
/ June 17, 2013Do you have to already be a free person to do the A4V? I’m looking for the step by step instructions on how to have access to my trust account , can you help me
LikeLike
realitybloger
/ June 17, 2013The word “free” and the word “person” do not go together. Being free is the absence of person. A person is granted the government privilege of “freedom”, a completely different thing. Freedom is the right to be forced to obey law. Thus, freedom = obey the law. Being free means shedding this political right and privilege of freedom for natural rights.
My apologies, but I did not pursue this course. I leave this post up, but recommend my more current research. So I cannot aid you in this capacity, other than to say that your “contracts” are signed only by you, and that this makes you the sole signatory, which means only you can alter the contract since no other party signed.
UCC is commercial in nature, thus not for me as a free man. It requires you operate under “commerce”, as implied by the name.
-Clint-
LikeLike
Dave
/ July 12, 2013Hello Clint thank you for your time and care with which you present this issue. I have to ask, any update since we’re in 2013 now?
LikeLike
realitybloger
/ July 13, 2013I chose not to pursue the SPC or UCC avenue for myself, as I realized that the state of being a free man was dependent on having no paper trail of citizenship or anything else. UCC is COMMERCIAL in nature, and this is not where I wish to be. Because I decided to give up all “possessions” that can be “registered”, I am not in need of the SPC status. I will never have property. I will never again have debt. So I am in the process of relinquishing all ties that bind. And since most ties are based on the fraudulent Social Security number, they represent fraud as well. I will be documenting my process as I go.
The first and only movie I have seen about actually being free is UNGRIP on youtube. Check it out.
-Clint-
LikeLike
Dave
/ July 30, 2013Thank you Clint I will
LikeLike
Sarena
/ January 16, 2014Hi, Clint my name is Sarena and I saw your blog on the strawman and I wondering if you could help me. I have a student loan and they recently just started garnishing my wages. I recived a letter from EOS CCA-ED debt collector to explain my hardship… the original debt was with Carrington collage DeVry Inc. I have this example letter below that I’m told to use for the loan haven’t sent it try to do more research. I just would like to know how I go about it stop garnishment and the debt completely thank you so much for your blog
Example letter
xxxxxBank
xxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
RE: Acct. # xxxxx
Dear ???? (I do not in fact have a name to address this letter to, as not one of the letters I received came from a person. They have been signed “xxxBank”, and so this letter is addressed similarly.)
As a point of fact, I have no idea who, if anyone is reading this letter. I send it as an exercise in communication. Do institutions read? I have not in my lifetime ever had a conversation or exchanged correspondence with an institution. This is a first.
The letter in question was dated May 16, 2013. I assume this was a computer generated date, as in fact there is no evidence otherwise. The letter in question uses the pronoun “you” often. It never, as a point of fact, references the writer of the letter. I have no choice then but to assume this “formal demand…of the entire balance… within ten days of the date of the letter” is made by a computer. I do not respond to demands made by machines.
The last time I checked, I was a living, breathing being, fully empowered with my own value. As such, I introduce the following information.
It has been brought to my attention recently that on December 24th 2012, the Whitehouse was served with foreclosure documents. Our alleged Governments (actually Corporations pretending to be Governments) were accused of Treason and Monetary System Slavery (in many forms). These Corporations who were pretending to be Governments and all Banks, and all Companies who were operating as Corporations were foreclosed upon on that date. Since the “alleged” US Government was a Corporation and never our Government, it has been foreclosed upon. They were noticed 3 times in a row and given the opportunity to answer to this charge. They remained silent.
During a Christmas Vacation in 1913 while Congress was still in session, two Congressmen (Wall Street Bankers who became Congressmen), wrote a bill to Charter the Federal Reserve Bank. Woodrow Wilson, our president at that time, signed it into law. His face is on the highest denomination ever in circulation (1934 – 1935), the $100,000.00 bill.
Around the same time all Government offices incorporated and created Corporate Government offices for profit. Even the Securities and Exchange Commission is merely a Corporation for profit, and is not a lawful Constitutional Government office. So, all Corporate Charters issued since 1913 are unlawful and illegal.
When we are born a Trust Bond Account is assigned to you as well as every live birth human being. You can see proof of that account number if you view any Birth Certificate, locate and see the Bond Number assigned. This is assigned to the straw man name assigned to each of us. That straw man name would be written or typed out in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS. Once a person passes 7 years old they file a charge that the person (straw man) has died, and Corporate Governments collect on that persons Trust.
The straw man was invented to register everything and everyone in commerce. Why? The Constitution granted government the right to regulate commerce and explicitly forbade them from bossing around a natural person. So, they tricked natural people into registering themselves in Commerce, and then used the freedom built into the Constitution to regulate, own, and trade everything they had just put into commerce. This includes you (assuming you are a natural person and not a computer or an institution) and me. Once you’re registered in commerce via birth certificates, licenses, social security or simple contracts then they had you.
Also when a person uses their signature, loan companies, banks and other institutions “monetize” that signature and turn it in for money. It is becoming common knowledge that this can repeated for up to five times the original loan amounts.
According to the UCC filings by the One Peoples Public Trust at http://www.peoplestrust1776.org alleged Governments, Banks, and Corporations (loan institutions) have all been filed upon through these UCC filings. We are now under “Common Law” not “the law of the sea, Corporate Law, Maritime Law”; which is no longer valid. The One Peoples Public Trust, with these filings, puts an end to all corporate entities which were created to “handle, manipulate and use for profit” all the commerce they created.
All current UCC files can be viewed in full at the website listed above, see upper column and click on “UCC Filings”. The Trustee’s phone numbers are posted at the website as well. Included with this letter is a two page description of the Trust and filings.
As a result of these actions, here are my questions and requirements. I have reason to believe that XXX Bank failed to disclose that XXX Bank used my note, capital, funds or money equivalent to fund a similar instrument that was used to fund the charges on the alleged account, whereby XXX Bank risked nothing of value; also, that XXX Bank has not used any of its own capital, money, funds or money equivalent to pay for any charges on the alleged account and in fact used my note to fund charges to the account while retaining payments from me.
Was there ever an actual loan made? To establish if a loan was made and that I may have a legal debt, you would have to produce documentation of prior title, ownership and rights to the money you purportedly loaned.
Produce documentation of the history and origin of funds that they purportedly had prior title, ownership and rights to and that you purportedly loaned me (banking requires 3 generations at least if not all the way back to issuance/creation of the alleged funds…this is why Banks issue a letter of origin /history of funds).
Produce documentation of the actual transaction and transfer of said funds (prior title, ownership, and rights) from loaner to borrower (invoicing /receipts) there is a difference between a loan and a debt, conceptually and factually. Only an invoice has to be paid…however you would first have to show that a loan was made…if no loan, each invoice is fraud.
Proof that one of my original wet ink signatures has not been monetized and you already have been paid in advance for my loan.
The above, which by all current law is legally correct, means that the loan as indicated above was never legal to begin with, all slavery money making systems (those giving loans, using credit scores to give higher base loans, monetizing signatures and collecting several times from signature were fraud to begin with), in addition to all Corporations not having legal corporate charters because the Securities and Exchange Commission is a Corporation for profit and not a Constitutional Government office in the first place; then this institution is operating unlawfully. The UCC filings state that all Corporations have been foreclosed. All debt has been cancelled from these foreclosures.
This is a plethora of evidence to that fact. I believe the UCC filings are lawful and correct, and that you are
One of those Corporations that has been foreclosed, and may be operating a unlawful Money Slavery System spoken about in the UCC filings, and
2. May also have monetized my signature on the documents and/or the check I counter signed as well. I want proof you have not been paid off in advance, I want proof you are operating legally as a Corporation and according to the paperwork I have witnessed you are not. I want proof this debt in fact has not been dismissed as a result of the UCC Filings.
In communicating with me, I will need to know in what capacity you are doing so. Since xxxxxxxBank is not a legal Corporation or a person. Are you communicating with me as another person? Any and all future correspondence/documents must be signed personally, not stamped by a computer.
Sincerely,
“I reserve all my rights without prejudice” UCC 1-308
LikeLike
realitybloger
/ January 19, 2014You have no contract with a third party. Thus, the third party is acting under “color of law”, which carries huge fines and imprisonment, which can be found on the FBI website and in U.S. Code
I have toyed with taking down this post, for I did not and do not intend to follow any commercial venture. I have learned too much to be fooled into another form of paper slavery. No person in debt can be free. I think you need to pay your debts, for the maxims of law are against you. Honor = payment of debt or obligation. One cannot be free without honor in their system.
I will be posting a new post soon about this. But there is no easy out or easy answer.
Sorry, but the game is much different than I could have ever imagined, so I can’t in good conscious tell you to follow commercial solutions.
If you’d like to talk personally I’d be happy to, just send an email to temporaryinsanity4848@yahoo.com
I
LikeLike
Steve
/ January 24, 2014Clint, If you have read Lysander Spooner’s No Treason: The Constitution of No Authority then you know all governments are men and women providing services at the barrel of a gun. Their killers, thieves and liars.
The four elements of a contract are 1) offer 2) meeting of the minds 3) consideration 4) agreement.
Hundreds and perhaps by now thousands of prosecutors have failed to show evidence the code and constitution are applicable to the defendant. Precisely because there is no evidence. This has been happening in several courts in at least a half dozen counties.
Politicians don’t represent anyone but themselves. Pay the tax or go to jail is not representation. It’s ownership. I ask Mr. Politician: How can you claim representation when you have no voluntary support whatsoever?
I’ll answer that myself. Pay or get shot is the end result of the force continuum which all code enforcers in every alphabet agency and police agency rely on. It doesn’t matter what the code violation is, if the person persists in resisting the aggressor (cop or code enforcer) the end result is being shot.
So, to answer the question, Politicians are killers, thieves and liars. They have zero credibility from the get-go. And no human should give credence, dignity or air of legitimacy to them by using their code/laws/statutes or voting in their organized crime syndicates. BTW, I did my research on the STRAWMAN, commercial redemption and UCC back in 2006 through 2008.
Because violent taxation is a crime in the real sense of the word, everything the government — men and women providing services at the barrel of a gun — does is invalid, not legitimate. It’s massive fraud and all the ill-gotten gains and wealth accumulated from their frauds must be returned to their victims.
Here’s a link to an audio/reading of Lysander Spooner’s, No Treason: The Constitutions of No Authority. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dWESql2dXoc
Here’s a link to the text version that Spooner wrote: http://lysanderspooner.org/node/64
“The most potent weapon of the oppressor is the mind of the oppressed.”~ Steven Biko
“What good fortune for governments that the people do not think.” ~ Adolph Hitler
Man didn’t progress from stone tools to harnessing fire to language to writing to the wheel to steam power/engine, to generating wide-spread electric power to nuclear energy to the Internet and beyond by the aid of government, but rather, inspite of governments.
Essentially everyone is an anarchist/voluntaryist. Most have yet to realize it. Simply ask this question: Should a service be provided on a compulsory basis whether you want it or not? Ie, pay or get shot.
Here’s a short video of that in action: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XhyXveYtChk
LikeLike
Tyco Tyson
/ September 7, 2013Hello,
How do I apply for a Visa Black Card from the US Treasury Department? Has anyone did this procedure yet? If you did, I wish to hear from you. My email is: tycotyson@yahoo.com
LikeLike
Brittany Pollard
/ November 2, 2013I am 18 years old, this is all new to me and my mind is blown! I’m amazed that this information is so rare to find. I want to help bring change, and more importantly I crave to learn more. Please if you have the time, help me to understand more. I’m most curious as to how one can still become employed or make money, pay utilities, etc. I have so man questions, along with extreme gratitude that you have written this arcticle! Don’t stop what you are doing. I may only be one (very young) person but today my life has changed. Thank you.
LikeLike
onewoundedman
/ December 23, 2013Reblogged this on onewoundedman and commented:
Knowledge is Power
LikeLike
oh auto insurance
/ January 16, 2014Hey, thank you for possting this 🙂
LikeLike
TM Claude
/ January 25, 2014Ya know, I really became excited upon learning of this technique. But then it occurred to me, was not Iraq a sovereign, also many of the other nations this government now occupies, all of which had a standing army and other military branches. Look what happened to them. These people are evil. We have reached a time in history where the only thing we can do to protect ourselves is to find a good hiding spot. Ultimately, the procedures described here will only draw attention. Let’s all go hide!
LikeLike
Wiremu
/ January 31, 2014Hi there, woulf deffinately like to have a private convrrsation with you one day. I have only really taken note of this truth if you like, since I was denied the right to name my child how I wanted. It brort about confusion n suspicion so I started googling and a year later I have arrived here. I have a journey nfront of me and I think u may have already taken part of it.
LikeLike
james
/ June 8, 2014How do we “kill” off the artificial person?
LikeLike
HC
/ September 16, 2014Hard to find info on Gordon Hall. Looks like he was sentenced to 15 years for defrauding the U.S. government in his case. Nothing new on Creditors in Commerce site since early 2014. This is great mind freeing stuff, but you have to know EVERY angle before trying to put this in practice. I hope this is relevant to this blog.
LikeLike
Justin
/ September 16, 2014Reblogged this on A vision for 2020 Blog and commented:
Why do humans have to make things so complicated? This is a very well put together blog. Thanks
LikeLike
UnseenProoF
/ October 14, 2014This was and is still well needed…thank you for all of your hard work and dedication. Everyone should know this and all who are wise enough to understand all of this shud overstand all we are facing today. Im trying to learn all i can now before doing this.and i also woud love help getting it done.
LikeLiked by 1 person
UnseenProoF
/ October 14, 2014Should**
LikeLike
UnseenProoF
/ October 17, 2014I know how to spell no need to correct my grammar. I would have typed the whole message in text message grammar but i didnt i actually just figured no one would try to correct it because you know what it says so i didnt bother. Oh wait (didn’t) But thank you. Lol smh
LikeLike
Julian's Real Mummy
/ October 18, 2014Reblogged this on The Real Mommies and Daddies of the Real America and commented:
Since an individual or agent erased this from my e-mail, I imagine that he/she/it did not want you, “We, the People…sovereign and elect, of divine and natural law or common law of the sovereign,” (to the best of my knowledge to the degree it has been sufficiently informed and noticed absent duress, threat, coercion, or law of necessity
LikeLike
tamika
/ June 1, 2015This is very interesting I dont know alot about law but I will now study this for my own knowledge I would love to be one of those individuals who crack the code knowledge is worth more than any money maybe one day We will form a group because great minds think alike and what I don’t know someone else may know but most of all is we need each other no one can do this alone
LikeLike
Michael Hunter
/ February 19, 2016Great Stuff. Thank you. Any way of downloading the Audio of Killing Your STRAWMAN 2 like on STRAWMAN 1?
LikeLike
Robert Hicks
/ July 6, 2016I want to do these things I’m 22, live in Norfolk, Va and I just want a bit more guidance to take control over my life.
LikeLike
Dickhd
/ November 2, 2016replyto: dbedboy@writeme.com
This post question’s are intended for those who already wrapped up the debt creditor/debtor secured party game and simply put know what they are doing, ESPECIALLY MODERATORS and I truly assert that something fruitful will come out of it as workable solution for post-modern outside commonwealth countries/states.
FACT 1 – I RESIDE IN EUROPEAN UNION IN OTHER WORDS NO COMMON LAW JURISDICTION EXISTS
FACT 2 – EU TRADEMARK LAW EXPLICITLY STATES THAT PERSONAL NAMES CANNOT BE COPYRIGHTED BUT ONLY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
FACT 3 – ONLY COMPANY NAMES AND PRODUCTS CAN BE TRADEMARKED WITH CONDITION TO SPECIFIED ONLY CATEGORIES OF TRADING
So I write this question’s with intent to find/forge workable solution, find existing parallels between jurisdictions and get myself on top of the game in EU non-common law jurisdiction as well. Might as well turn out interecting hacking/cracking the others code bodies unlike UCC.
1. HOW DOES UCC APPLY TO EU COUNTRIES JURISDICTINS WHICH HAS ITS OWN WRITTEN COMMERCIAL LAW
2. HOW TO BECOME CREDITOR/SECURED PARTY WITHOUT USING COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT NAME WHICH IS THE BASIS OF THE REMEDY/SOLUTION YOU ARE MENTIONING/OFFERING HERE ON THIS SITE AND MANY OTHERS
LET THIS BE IT TO BEGIN WITH AND PERHAPS NO-BULLSHIT DIRECT CONSTRUCTIVE ANSWERS/REPLIES WI’LL COME IN
LikeLike
realitybloger
/ November 2, 2016EU is not a territory (not land), it is a district, like the Washington D.C. Members of it are purely fictions, not men.
There are not personal names, only christian names and surnames (cognomen and agnomen). Cognomen is a family name and agnomen is an event, as the legal birth event of a legal entity. When the surname is registered to the christian name and used as a commercial vessel, that “citizen-ship” is property of the nation it is registered in. The christian name is property of Jehovah, and must be admixed to show intent to abandon Gods Law (of Nature).
You need to know that the “common” law is in its foundational the King James Bible. The Bible is not religion, it is Law. The word legal means anti-God, anti-Nature. The only reason you would be mixed up in any nation is if you are not following the Bible Law, which states to never take or respect persons, flattering titles, numbers, etc. To be clear, the Bible is common law. The maxims of law allow choice, as the Bible does, and the legal system is therefore there to catch the fallen, which most of us are from birth.
This definition helps us to understand its role in the United States, which is just a copy of other “christian nations” a false flattering title.
Christianity – The system of doctrines and precepts taught by Christ; the religion founded by Christ. Christianity is said to be part of the common law. “Christianity is parcel of the laws of England; and, therefore, to reproach the Christian religion is to speak in subversion of the law.” “The essential principles of natural religion” and “of revealed religion, are a part of the common law, so that any person reviling or subverting or ridiculing them may be prosecuted at common law.” “The true sense of the maxim is that the law will not permit the essential principles of revealed religion to be ridiculed and reviled.” Christianity is a part of the common law of Pennsylvania in the qualified sense that its divine origin and truth are admitted, and therefore it is not to be maliciously and openly reviled and blasphemed against, to the annoyance of believers or the injury of the public. Not Christianity founded upon any particular religious tenets; but Christianity with liberty of conscience to all men. The maxim does not mean that Christianity is an established religion; nor that its precepts, by force of their own authority, form part of our system of municipal law; nor that the courts may base their judgments upon the Bible; nor that religious duties may be penally enforced; nor that legal discrimination in favor of Christianity is allowed. The best features of the common law, especially those which regard the family and social relations, if not derived from, have at least been improved and strengthened by, the prevailing religion and the teachings of its sacred Book. But the law does not attempt to enforce the precepts of Christianity on the ground of their sacred character or divine origin. Some of those precepts, though we may admit their continual and universal obligation, we must nevertheless recognize as being incapable of enforcement by human laws. Those precepts, moreover, affect the heart, and address themselves to the conscience; while the laws of the state can regard the outward conduct only: for which reasons Christianity is not a part of the law of the land in any sense which entitles the courts to take notice of and base their judgments upon it, except so far they can find that its precepts and principles have been incorporated in and made a component part of the law of the State. The maxim can have no reference to the law of the National government, since the sources of that law are the Constitution, treaties, and acts of Congress. (W C Andersons Dictionary of Law, 1889)
The reason you believe there is not common law is because the common law is also called THE UNWRITTEN LAW. You cannot find it in the legal realm of public personhood. Citizenships of nations have no right to it, for they have abandoned the Natural Law for fiction and mammon (commerce).
To your other inquiries I will not answer, for I have learned that there is not political and legal solutions to what are spiritual problems. There is no Life in commerce, and certainly no spirituality in UCC. Its in the name, a matrix of code designed to keep you from the unwritten, moral Law of the Bible.
I am almost finished with my 1st book on this subject if you are interested, and may download it free at strawmanstory.info
I can no longer in good conscious steer people towards commerce and legalism of any kind. It is forbidden fruit, false knowledge. This is literally a dead end for spiritually dead persons.
-Clint-
LikeLike
Dickhd
/ November 4, 2016Consider this as for not being in commercce
Definition of sovereign is holding ultimate and supreme authority over your self – without any conditions whatsoever.
Claiming that you have God – an entity you belong to or/and your soul for that matter you have already admitted authority higher to you and therefore you entered into some or other kind of commerce – with you God.
And as people deposit money into banks, lots of people deposit their soul into safekeeping into/under some deity/entity, essentially giving your power away for exchange of service of safekeeping benefit and indirect admission that you cannot take care of your soul on your own.
Ponder on this two points as origin seed/concept/pattern that allows all other similar transaction happen and come into place.
LikeLike
Rebecca Mowry-Korver
/ January 4, 2017Do I have to file my ucc1 form with the state of my strawman was created before using the accepted for value
LikeLike
realitybloger
/ February 15, 2017I do not recommend this process. Those who claim it to have worked were either lucky to not have been audited or were unlucky enough to have the IRS come after them when they caught up on their paperwork five years later. The common mistake amongst these redemption people is that they believe that something unchallenged is something successful, i.e. land patents, etc. This is not the case.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Mark Voorhees
/ June 8, 2017Part of the problem is this is not a government of people whose hearts have been broken and renewed, it is might makes right, I have gone far down this path , none of us has any right to even life before our Maker for we all have sinned, you death to Him is your contract with Him….the entire court corporate system before whom you stand is guilty and have no rights at all even to life…the very fact that all people proves the point everyone is standing before Jesus, what I testify next has been lived out through me ….you do exactly as Jesus directs you in every facet of your life, if He tells you to pay your taxes you do it leave the consequences with Him if in your obedience you receive persecution know of a surety it is,not Jesus harassing you…..maintain humility before Him remember we have all sinned He will avenge you, Lucifer wants to kill you, you died to Jesus your life belongs to Him not Lucifer…..are you beginning to get the point ? you cannot defeat Lucifer dont even think for a minute you can you cannot reason with him he is a liar and a murderer…..he does not care about any law of God nor man….he is simply defeated convicted and awaiting the execution of his sentence the “government seeking to hold you in bondage” they themselves are in bondage awaiting death. ….witness to them of the King who owns you and Has purchased you when you were doomed to suffer eternal death….vow before the judge with your right hand to heaven and the King thereof whose servant you are…..Jesus will speak through with a power and a wisdom none can gains a nor resist and Jesus will testify in their souls you possess a wisdom and a life far higher then they ….He has done this through me in courts of law twice….both times the outcome hinged on Jesus testifying through me …..remember simplicity in humility is the citidel that even Lucifer cannot breach…..you will be clothed with the panoply of heaven and depending on the severity of the issue, like people thirsting for your blood and seeking to kill you …Jesus will avenge and when His power lights down the wicked will know the living definition of Divine terror….do not rejoice that Lucifer and his Angels are subject unto the Word Jesus writes into your soul rejoice your name is written in the Lamb’s Book of Life
LikeLike
Amir
/ December 19, 2020Hi I would like to know how someone who is incarcerated can accept their charges for value? And is it obligatory to become a secured party creditor before stating any claims?
LikeLike
realitybloger
/ December 24, 2020Greetings… I did not follow in this path, and I don’t think it is legitimate for common people. The UCC is set up for thieves, attorneys, and other criminals, not for regular citizenships. So I cannot in good conscious steer you in that direction or give you hope that this somehow will change your status. There is no pot of gold at the end of the non-existent rainbow. Christ and Christ alone (the Law of Nature personified) is the only Redeemer. You just need to understand what that allegory means. The Bible is a book of Law. Words on paper will never set you free. This is why I wrote my book. I wish you the best.
LikeLike
General Post Master, Steven-michael:Ben-yhwh
/ January 28, 2012The concepts being presented are very dangerous. In one breath you declare, you must separate from the state, the next breath you stand for the UCC?
Please, brother, realize the UCC has been created by THEM. You are taking one foot out of the sea and placing it into the fire.
Redemption does not reside in the UCC. How can you claim a separation from “THEIR” CODES, RULES and REGULATIONS by turning to more of “THEIR” CODES, RULES and REGULATIONS???
Does This make sense to you?
If you Enter a UCC1, you are entering into a contract with THEM!!!
Many, many men are in jail right now for these same actions!
The idea of A4V, or Accepted for Value is even more dangerous.
You state that “THEIR” system is fraud, but then you “Accept IT for Value”???? Are you insane?
These are the traps laid out for the uneducated. This system has a rule that its subjects must NEVER question the DEBT. If you play in THEIR system, you MUST play by THEIR rules!
The only way to win is NOT to play!!! This is very hard for most because they thrive on the conflict. We have been raised in a society of competition, instead of cooperation.
We must separate our company business from our personal business, because “It is ALL business”.
The only way to truly win in their “courts” is before the fact with your paperwork, that proves you are NOT in their jurisdiction.
Easiest way to see it is this: The U.S. opened up a company using your birth certificate number, then they waited seven years to see if there was a rebuttal to the presumption. Then, if you applied for a social security number for that company, you have then agreed to run that company according to THEIR rules. The company DOES NOT belong to you. It never did. It’s THEIRS.
But the flesh and blood you, IS NOT the company.
That is our redemption.
Put their company down. Refuse to be the slave. This is very difficult for most. But more and more everyday are doing this successfully. You can too. But it takes work and it takes a village. You must find others that think and feel as you do and band together. “Where two or more are gathered” there is power. We all need someone to watch our back.
If these type of ideas resonate with you, you can find others pursuing their right of self-determination at http://www.generalpost.org
sincerly,
General Post Master, Steven-michael:Ben-yhwh
LikeLike
Sarah Josephine
/ May 5, 2016I am looking for whoever understands the code I was shown by yhvh on this site. It was something He uniquely prepared me to understand. It was in the form of alphabetical characters displayed one at a time vertically, but could not be read in a linear fashion and understood. It spoke of the nails in His hands and something like a sand bar located in a certain region on earth. I pray I took screenshots. Looking now, it appears as if it could have, on the surface, just been an extreme kind of word wrap broken down literally to a letter by letter vertical chain but again, a linear reading was almost totally non sensical. Idk but Clint has not returned my email about it and the information I found in that alphanumeric string is something somebody needs to know if it was an unintentional occurrence. Yvhv is telling me He will be using my families property for children to be born, but NOT NUMBERED.
Anybody out there getting this???
LikeLike
realitybloger
/ May 9, 2016Have no idea what you are referring to, nor the email I apparently didn’t answer.
-Clint-
LikeLike