-≈-
The Global Social Security System
-≈-
Did you know that over 130 countries in the world now have a Social Security Insurance program?
Did you know that Social Security is run and regulated by the United Nations and its World Bank?
Have you ever heard of the International Social Security Association (ISSA)?
And did you know that the United States Social Security Administration has international treaties and agreements through the United Nations with other countries and their Social Security Systems?
Well, its all true… But before we get into that, let’s make sure we understand just what this Social program really means, being a United States Citizen with a Social Security Number.
It is so much more than you might think…
-≈-
Social Security – The Mark of the Beast
-≈-
The MARK of the BEAST is upon all American Citizens!!! And the Federal Corporation named the “UNITED STATES” is that BEAST!
And the MARK of the BEAST is the NUMBER…
-≈-
One of the greatest misconceptions of biblical prophesy is that the thing referenced in the Bible as the “Antichrist”, and in so many other fictional tales of said Antichrist, will some day be incarnated as a single living entity – a beast in the guise of a human – that will fool the people of Earth into loving and following that beast into a virtual hell and enslavement on Earth.
But I am here to provide you with an alternative and more realistic view. I am here to say that the biblical “Antichrist” is already upon us. It is not a single person; but a government run by and consented to by the people. It is not a living, breathing human or demon, but is instead all humans via their consent to it. It is not the devil reincarnate; but is in fact an incarnate body of legal codes that has created the Mark of the Beast through the people’s ignorance of the laws that they create. And I am here to say that it is not God that will save us from this Antichrist; but only our collective non-consent through non-participation in this system that will save us from ourselves.
If it is true that God gave men the gift and the curse of having freewill, then it must also be true that God only helps those who helps themselves…
-≈-
What is the Mark of the Beast?
-≈-
In TITLE 42 of U.S. CODE, entitled “THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE”, we can literally find the root of this evil MARK from the BEAST called SOCIAL SECURITY. Though TITLE 42 is not statutory law, but in actuality prima facie law (consent of the governed required), the implementation of that legal code is exactly what we’d expect from the beast as the Federal UNITED STATES corporation.
So let’s have a look at Section 666 of U.S.C. TITLE 42 “THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELLFARE”.
Section 666 of the Social Security Act requires every state (as federal insular possessions) to obtain a persons “NUMBER” that is attached to the “NAME” of that person before such things as a license to work, drive, marry, or any other State services (privileges – not rights) are granted; of which now include Federal grants and emoluments to the states as “revenue sharing” for promotion of this enslavement via the NUMBER. In other words, a natural born citizen of the united states of America cannot work in the Federal UNITED STATES jurisdictional territory (“The Federal United States”) without being marked by the Social Security number – the number of the beast.
For those of you that don’t understand the difference between these two governments and that as citizens you are required to obey both, please read what the Supreme Court’s opinion of this fact is here:
“The people of the United States resident within any State are subject to two Governments: one State, and the other National; but there need be no conflict between the two. The powers which one possesses, the other does not. They are established for different purposes, and have separate jurisdictions. Together they make one whole, and furnish the people of the United States with a complete government, ample for the protection of all their rights (privileges) at home and abroad. True, it may sometimes happen that a person is amenable to both jurisdictions for one and the same act… It is the natural consequence of a citizenship which owes allegiance to two sovereignties, and claims protection from both. The citizen cannot complain, because he has VOLUNTARILY submitted himself to such a form of government.“ –The Supreme Court, 92 US 551: “U.S. v Cruikshank”
“And behold, I swear unto you, if ye will do this, with an oath, ye shall not be destroyed; but if ye will not do this, I swear unto you with an oath, that on the morrow month I will command that my armies shall come down against you, and they shall not stay their hand and shall spare not, but shall slay you, and shall let fall the sword upon you even until ye shall become extinct.” –Nephi 3:8
While I can choose to not consent to the mark (the social security number), the BEAST has made it virtually impossible to work, drive, spend money, or live legally without this number within the corporate world of the jurisdiction of the BEAST. And as a corporation of any kind (including that of being a person with a NUMBER), that business must comply with now established state and federal laws to continue to legally do incorporated business in the state, which is within the federal district of The Federal United States (A.K.A. The BEAST). In short, the ability to not consent to this MARK is nullified by the BEAST through the legal code that makes those without the NUMBER unable to support themselves or work without the MARK.
Section 666 of TITLE 42 clearly lays out this authority and jurisdiction. Though the majority of this CODE is referring to paternal suits of child support, it is important to understand that this power can be applied to anyone through such tools as due process and other abusive authorities. To understand the true significance of Section 666, one must understand that through the due process of the BAR Association in the court system, it is the opinion of all courts – municipal or federal (district) – that you do not own your children alone, and that your children are literally owned by the BEAST (the State).
So that there is no doubt of this being true, please review my previous article here:
Do You Own Your Children? –> http://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2011/12/16/do-you-own-your-children/
Excerpt from this article:
Appellate Court of Illinois, NO. 5-97-0108:
“Marriage is a civil contract to which there are three parties-the husband, the wife and the state.“
Van Koten v. Van Koten. 154 N.E. 146.
Continued…
“…When two people decide to get married, they are required to first procure a license from the State. If they have children of this marriage, they are required by the State to submit their children to certain things, such as school attendance and vaccinations. Furthermore, if at some time in the future the couple decides the marriage is not working, they must petition the State for a divorce. Marriage is a three-party contract between the man, the woman, and the State“
Linneman v. Linneman, 1 Ill. App. 2d 48, 50, 116 N.E.2d 182, 183 (1953), citing Van Koten v. Van Koten, 323 Ill. 323, 326, 154 N.E. 146 (1926).
“The State represents the public interest in the institution of marriage.”
Linneman, 1 Ill. App. 2d at 50, 116 N.E.2d at 183 (1953).
Continued…
“This public interest is what allows the State to intervene in certain situations to protect the interests of members of the family. The State is like a silent partner in the family who is not active in the everyday running of the family but becomes active and exercises its power and authority only when necessary to protect some important interest of family life.”
“The state has a wide range of power for limiting parental freedom and authority in things affecting the child’s welfare… In fact, the entire familial relationship involves the State.”
Prince, 321 U.S. at 167, 64 S.Ct. at 442, 88 L.Ed. 645.
(SOURCE: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/il-court-of-appeals/1486817.html)
“The primary control and custody of infants is with the government.”
Tillman V. Roberts. 108 So. 62
“There is no wider area for the exercise of judicial discretion than that of providing for and protecting the best interests of children.“
Ex parte Handley, 460 So.2d 167 (Ala.1984).
“The court stands in the position of parens patria[e] of children.“
Ayers v. Kelley, 284 Ala. 321, 224 So.2d 673 (1969)․
“Parens patriae,” literally “parent of the country,” refers traditionally to role of state as sovereign and guardian of persons under legal disability.”
Ex parte Bayliss, 550 So.2d 986, 988 n. 1 (Ala.1989) (quoting Black’s Law Dictionary 1003 (5th ed.1979)).
“Pursuant to the parens patriae doctrine, ‘the primary control and custody of infants is with the government, to be delegated, as of course, to their natural guardians and protectors, so long as such guardians are suitable persons to exercise it.’ ”
Ex parte Wright, 225 Ala. 220, 222, 142 So. 672, 674 (1932). See also Fletcher v. Preston, 226 Ala. 665, 148 So. 137 (1933); and Striplin v. Ware, 36 Ala. 87 (1860).
“In other words, the state is the father and mother of the child and the natural parents are not entitled to custody, except upon the state’s beneficent recognition that natural parents presumably will be the best of its citizens to delegate its custodial powers… ‘The law devolves the custody of infant children upon their parents, not so much upon the ground of natural right in the latter, as because the interests of the children, and the good of the public, will, as a general rule, be thereby promoted.’ “
Chandler v. Whatley, 238 Ala. 206, 208, 189 So. 751, 753 (1939) (quoting Striplin v. Ware, 36 Ala. at 89) (‘ ’).
(SOURCE: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/al-court-of-civil-appeals/1325717.html)
And now that we understand that you are only the delegated third party guardian of State “property” instead of what you thought were your children, we can examine in full Section 666 with the understanding that through marriage contract and the NUMBER as a MARK on all persons – including children – the BEAST has complete control over you and your children and their well-being because they are indeed MARKED with the NUMBER. And the BEAST also has the self-delegated authority to force a person to be guardian of that child through monetary payments – even if that person is never allowed to see that child again. Similar to being put on probation, this judgment for “child support” is used not for the benefit of the child, but for the benefit of the BEAST to contol that person and to justify the stripping of that persons rights (privileges) if he or she does not comply.
Forcing parents to fill out a birth certificate and register their child in the Civil Service and Social Security system is paramount for this claimed legal ownership by the BEAST through due process to have jurisdiction and authority.
Now, let’s read TITLE 42, Section 666…
-≈-
TITLE 42 > CHAPTER 7 > SUBCHAPTER IV > Part D > § 666 states:
(16) Authority to withhold or suspend licenses.— Procedures under which the State has (and uses in appropriate cases) authority to withhold or suspend, or to restrict the use of driver’s licenses, professional and occupational licenses, and recreational and sporting licenses of individuals owing overdue support or failing, after receiving appropriate notice, to comply with subpoenas or warrants relating to paternity or child support proceedings.
-≈-
And what does the bible say?
“Also it causes all, both small and great, both rich and poor, both free and slave, to be marked on the right hand or the forehead, so that no one can buy or sell unless he has the mark, that is, the name of the beast or the number of its name. This calls for wisdom: let the one who has understanding calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man, and his number is 666.” -Revelation 13:16-18
“Then I saw thrones, and seated on them were those to whom the authority to judge was committed. Also I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded… who had not worshiped the beast or its image and had not received its mark on their foreheads or their hands.“ -Revelation 20:4
-≈-
And what if an employer chooses not to consent to garnishing the wages of their employees for this corrupt system? Does an employer really have a choice?
Again from: TITLE 42> Chapter 7> SubChapter IV> Part D> Section 666:
(B) Methods must be established by the State to simplify the withholding process for employers to the greatest extent possible, including permitting any employer to combine all withheld amounts into a single payment to each appropriate agency or entity (with the portion thereof which is attributable to each individual employee being separately designated).
(C) The employer must be held liable to the State for any amount which such employer fails to withhold from income due an employee following receipt by such employer of proper notice under subparagraph (A), but such employer shall not be required to vary the normal pay and disbursement cycles in order to comply with this paragraph.
(D) Provision must be made for the imposition of a fine against any employer who
(i) discharges from employment, refuses to employ, or takes disciplinary action against any noncustodial parent subject to income withholding required by this subsection because of the existence of such withholding and the obligations or additional obligations which it imposes upon the employer; or
(ii) fails to withhold support from income or to pay such amounts to the State disbursement unit in accordance with this subsection,
Authors note: This means employers have no right to fire wife-beaters, rapists, or child abusers without heavy fines [taxes]; which ensures the money flows into the Court Registry Investment System [CRIS] accounts to be invested by the for-profit court system.
In the guise of protecting children, Section 666 also states:
(f) Uniform Interstate Family Support Act
In order to satisfy section 654 (20)(A) of this title, on and after January 1, 1998, each State must have in effect the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act, as approved by the American Bar Association on February 9, 1993, and as in effect on August 22, 1996, including any amendments officially adopted as of such date by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws.
Authors note: The BAR Association is a private corporation, a non-governmental association which represents attorneys, for which government contracts with as the judicial. Perhaps you should be asking yourself why the American BAR Association is allowed to force all states to adopt this Act? Do you still believe in states rights?
§ 654a. Automated data processing
(a) In general
In order for a State to meet the requirements of this section, the State agency administering the State program under this part shall have in operation a single statewide automated data processing and information retrieval system which has the capability to perform the tasks specified in this section with the frequency and in the manner required by or under this part.
(b) Program management
The automated system required by this section shall perform such functions as the Secretary may specify relating to management of the State program under this part, including—
(1) controlling and accounting for use of Federal, State, and local funds in carrying out the program; and
(2) maintaining the data necessary to meet Federal reporting requirements under this part on a timely basis.
(3) Use of standardized data elements
Such records shall use standardized data elements for both parents (such as names, social security numbers and other uniform identification numbers, dates of birth, and case identification numbers), and contain such other information (such as on case status) as the Secretary may require.
(4) Liens.— Procedures under which—
(A) liens arise by operation of law (due process) against real and personal property for amounts of overdue support owed by a noncustodial parent who resides or owns property in the State; and
(B) the State accords full faith and credit to liens described in Subparagraph (A) arising in another State, when the State agency, party, or other entity seeking to enforce such a lien complies with the procedural rules relating to recording or serving liens that arise within the State, except that such rules may not require judicial notice or hearing prior to the enforcement of such a lien…
(I) No right to jury trial. — Procedures providing that the parties to an action to establish paternity are not entitled to a trial by jury.
One of the fallacies of living in the United States has always been the freedom and autonomy of the individual states. Most citizens believe that if they don’t like the rules and legal codes in one state, they can simply move to another state.
But the individual states are not able to protect their people (citizens) from the criminal court activities of another state, and instead must follow the Uniform Commercial Codes set forth by the BAR and Federal powers, at the threat of losing Federal funds and grants. And under the guise of child protection and caring for the “fatherless”, the following laws are now uniform in all states.
“REQUIREMENT OF STATUTORILY PRESCRIBED PROCEDURES TO IMPROVE EFFECTIVENESS OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT”
Child Support and Establishment of Paternity. Sec. 666.
Requirement of statutorily prescribed procedures to improve effectiveness of child support enforcement. Each State must enact laws requiring the use of the following “procedures” to increase the effectiveness of the program:
.
DNA TESTING
The State shall provide procedures which permit the establishment of the paternity of a child. In a contested paternity case [the State shall] require the child and all other parties to submit to genetic tests upon request supported by a sworn statement by the party alleging paternity, and setting forth facts establishing a reasonable possibility of the requisite sexual contact between the parties; or denying paternity, and setting forth facts establishing a reasonable possibility of the nonexistence of sexual contact between the parties. If no objection is made, the test results are admissible as evidence of paternity without the need for other proof of authenticity or accuracy. States must give full faith and credit to a determination of paternity made by any other State. The State procedures shall provide that the parties to an action to establish paternity are not entitled to a trial by jury.
.
GARNISHMENT OF WAGES
The State shall provide procedures for child support withholding from wages. The wages of an absent parent shall be subject to withholding, regardless of whether support payments are in arrears (guilty until proven innocent). The employer, upon being given notice, is required to withhold wages in the amount specified by the notice and pay such amount to the appropriate agency. The employer must be held liable to the State for any amount which the employer fails to withhold from wages due an employee following receipt of the notice. A fine [shall be] imposed against any employer who discharges from employment, refuses to employ, or takes disciplinary action against any absent parent subject to wage withholding because of the existence of such withholding and the obligations or additional obligations which it imposes upon the employer. The State may withhold from forms of income other than wages regardless of the nature of their income-producing activities. The State must extend its withholding system [to provide for withholding in] cases where the applicable support orders were issued in other States. Any refund of State income tax will be reduced by the amount of any overdue support owed by an absent parent
Author’s note: This explains the real reason the tax system seems so screwed up – forced over-payments of income taxes equal money held for hostage by the IRS for bad behavior… or it equals a refund for good behavior.
.
CREDIT REPORTING AND SUSPENSION OF LICENSES
[The procedures must assure that] [t]he State has authority to withhold or suspend, or to restrict the use of driver’s licenses, professional and occupational licenses, and recreational licenses of individuals owing overdue support or failing, to comply with subpoenas or warrants relating to paternity or child support proceedings.
Author’s note: With the authority to stop you from driving, working, hunting, gardening, or anything else that requires a license or permission from the State, your compliance to the rules of the State are all but guaranteed. And for those who still wont comply, we now have current and impending legislation allowing for debtor’s prisons.
.
ACCESS TO RECORDS, LOCATING INDIVIDUALS, REQUIRING SSN
The State shall have procedures to ensure that all Federal and State agencies conducting activities under this part have access to any system used by the State to locate an individual for purposes relating to motor vehicles or law enforcement. The state shall have procedures requiring that the social security number of: (A) any applicant for a professional license, driver’s license, occupational license, recreational license, or marriage license be recorded on the application; (B) any individual who is subject to a divorce decree, support order, or paternity determination or acknowledgment be placed in the records relating to the matter; and (C) any individual who has died be placed in the records relating to the death and be recorded on the death certificate.
.
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
[The State enforcement agency] shall enter into agreements with financial institutions doing business in the State to develop and operate a data match system using automated data exchanges in which each such financial institution is required to provide the name, address, social security number or other identifying information for each noncustodial parent who maintains an account at such institution and who owes past-due support, and will encumber or surrender, as the case may be, assets held by such institution on behalf of the parent. A financial institution shall not be liable under any Federal or State law to any person for any disclosure of information to the State agency; for encumbering or surrendering any assets [under these laws]; or for any other action taken in good faith to comply with the requirements. The State shall periodically report to consumer reporting agencies [credit bureaus] the name [and social security number] of any parent who owes overdue support.
Author’s Note: This system of automated bank withdrawal or withholding will eventually be used to pay everything the State collects, including fines, taxes and any other fees – without your approval. You see… your approval is not needed. Your consent is attained through the voluntary acceptance and use of the NUMBER of the BEAST, for which the BEAST is making it very hard to live without within its jurisdiction.
.
AUTOMATED DATA COLLECTION
The State shall establish an automated data collection system (linked database) to include a registry to be known as the ‘State Case Registry’ that contains records with respect to each case in which services are being provided by a State agency. Each [child] support order established or modified in the State on or after October 1, 1998, shall be included in the State Case Registry. [The information in the State Case Registries shall be] furnished to the Federal Case Registry of Child Support Orders. The State Case Registry may be established by linking local case registries of [child] support orders through an automated information network. Such records shall use standardized data elements for both parents (such as names, social security numbers and other uniform identification numbers, dates of birth, and case identification numbers), and other information as the Secretary may require. The State agency operating the automated system shall establish, update, maintain, and regularly monitor, case records in the State Case Registry. The State shall use the automated system to extract information (at such times, and in such standardized format or formats, as may be required by the Secretary), to share and compare information with, and to receive information from, other databases and information comparison services, in order to obtain (or provide) information necessary to enable the State agency (or the Secretary or other State or Federal agencies) to carry out this part.
.
NEW HIRES DIRECTORY
On and after October 1, 1997, each State shall establish an automated directory (to be known as the ‘State Directory of New Hires’) which shall contain information supplied on each newly hired employee in the State. The State will operate a State Directory of New Hires in accordance with section 453A. Each employer shall furnish to the Directory of New Hires of the State in which a newly hired employee works, a report that contains the name, address, and social security number of the employee, and the name and address of the employer.
Author’s note: Eventually, if you have a job in America, you will be on this list. The implementation of Real ID via “E-Verify” will assure this uniformly in all 50 states – and you will not be able to be hired without being “verified” through the MARK of your NUMBER. Child support as used in this section is only one of hundreds of excuses for the implementation of these standards. After all, you could be a terrorist… and potential terrorists must be tracked and watched! And just so that you understand, EVERY PERSON IS A POTENTIAL TERRORIST!!!
.
ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITY
The State shall have procedures which give the State [enforcement agency] the authority to take the following actions relating to establishment of paternity or to establishment, modification, or enforcement of support orders, without the necessity of obtaining an order from any other judicial or administrative tribunal, to take the following actions: To subpoena any financial or other information needed to establish, modify, or enforce a support order, and to impose penalties for failure to respond to such a subpoena; To require all entities in the State (including for-profit, nonprofit [including churches], and governmental employers) to provide promptly, in response to a request by the State agency of that or any other State administering a program under this part, information on the employment, compensation, and benefits of any individual employed by such entity as an employee or contractor, and to sanction failure to respond to any such request; To obtain access, subject to safeguards on privacy and information security, and subject to the nonliability of entities that afford such access under this subparagraph, to information contained in the following records (including automated access, in the case of records maintained in automated data bases): (i) Records of other State and local government agencies, including vital statistics (including records of marriage, birth, and divorce); State and local tax and revenue records (including information on residence address, employer, income and assets); records concerning real and titled personal property; records of occupational and professional licenses, and records concerning the ownership and control of corporations, partnerships, and other business entities; employment security records; records of agencies administering public assistance programs; records of the motor vehicle department; and corrections records; (ii) Certain records held by private entities with respect to individuals who owe or are owed support (or against or with respect to whom a support obligation is sought), consisting of the names and addresses of such individuals and the names and addresses of the employers of such individuals, as appearing in customer records of public utilities and cable television companies, pursuant to an administrative subpoena; and. information (including information on assets and liabilities) on such individuals held by financial institutions.
Author’s note: And this explains why it seems like you are trying to access Fort Knox every time you attempt to gain a “service” like cable television or to open a simple checking account. These corporations must comply with the Federal and State requirements to obtain every ounce of information from you as a “customer”, so that future actions as described above can be taken against you through every single part of your day to day life. In short, either conform to government or your life will be shut off and your money and investments seized. Sound familiar?
“Also it causes all, both small and great, both rich and poor, both free and slave, to be marked on the right hand or the forehead, so that no one can buy or sell unless he has the mark, that is, the name of the beast or the number of its name. This calls for wisdom: let the one who has understanding calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man, and his number is 666.” -Revelation 13:16-18
Author’s note: Only a fool would take this passage so literally that they would argue that this can’t be the MARK because it is not on the forehead or the right hand”. The government (the BEAST) operates clandestinely, and so it would not make the MARK so easy to see for the average Social Security Card-carrying citizen. The MARK is the NUMBER…
.
REVOCATION OF PASSPORTS
If the Secretary receives a certification that an individual owes arrearages of child support in an amount exceeding $5,000, the Secretary shall transmit such certification to the Secretary of State for action with respect to denial, revocation, or limitation of passports, and refuse to issue a passport to such individual, and may revoke, restrict, or limit a passport issued previously to such individual.
Author’s note: Again we see another fallacy shattered in American culture – the “right” to travel can indeed be suspended.
.
INTERNATIONAL ENFORCEMENT
The Secretary of State, with the concurrence of the Secretary of Health and Human Services, is authorized to declare any foreign country to be a foreign reciprocating country if the foreign country has established, or undertakes to establish, procedures for the establishment and enforcement of duties of [child] support substantially in conformity with [these laws].
-≈-
Forced Commerce: Health Insurance Required By All Citizens
-≈-
In one of the latest pushes by the BEAST, government has once again attempted to fool the MARKED citizenry via the implementation a system of “health-care reform”. The most important aspect of this reform is to require the consent of the citizens of the BEAST to obtain health insurance. Similar to requiring participation in the Social Security Old Age Retirement and Disability system itself, the BEAST is now making legislation to require all persons to obtain mandated health insurance. And just like the Social Security investment trust funds, which now stand at over 2.6 trillion in investments, the insurance companies that receive these required payments from all citizens will invest that money in their own funds, while the insured citizens suffer the poorly presented health-care that the BEAST will be regulating.
It is very important to understand while reading this that what is being forced here is not socialism. This is instead what I refer to as forced commerce in a corporatist government – the requirement of the purchase of a service or product at the barrel of a gun – for which the BEAST utilizes and abuses the “interstate commerce clause” through due process by the BAR to force all citizens to purchase health insurance. This is not a tax for socialized or national health care as in other countries, but is instead a requirement to obtain private insurance to cover health care costs (forced commerce). This in no way guarantees that health care will be provided or approved by the insurance companies, nor does it guarantee that a hospital will accept your insurance or you as a patient. Therefore, this is not socialized medicine, but rather the dictatorial requirements of for-profit “forced commerce” in private corporations for the citizenry who carry the MARK and NUMBER of the BEAST.
-≈-
TITLE 42> Chapter 157> Subchapter V> Part A> § 18091 states the following:
§ 18091 - Requirement To Maintain Minimum Essential Coverage
(1) In general
The individual responsibility requirement provided for in this section (in this section referred to as the “requirement”) is commercial and economic in nature, and substantially affects interstate commerce, as a result of the effects described in paragraph (2).
(2) Effects on the national economy and interstate commerce
The effects described in this paragraph are the following:
(A) The requirement regulates activity that is commercial and economic in nature: economic and financial decisions about how and when health care is paid for, and when health insurance is purchased. In the absence of the requirement, some individuals would make an economic and financial decision to forego health insurance coverage and attempt to self-insure, which increases financial risks to households and medical providers.
Author’s Note: This means that the BEAST believes that it is the civic duty that all citizens be required to purchase health insurance that government mandates, and that the BEAST believes that it has final authority in this matter. You do not have a choice, and should not be allowed to self-insure for the betterment of the United Nations, Agenda 21 “social welfare”.
(B) Health insurance and health care services are a significant part of the national economy. National health spending is projected to increase from $2,500,000,000,000, or 17.6 percent of the economy, in 2009 to $4,700,000,000,000 in 2019. Private health insurance spending is projected to be $854,000,000,000 in 2009, and pays for medical supplies, drugs, and equipment that are shipped in interstate commerce. Since most health insurance is sold by national or regional health insurance companies, health insurance is sold in interstate commerce and claims payments flow through interstate commerce.
Author’s Note: Notice that the government recognizes that health care is by far the most profitable industry in the national economy, and measures this fact not in the human suffering that modern health-care causes, but in the profit attained by the symptom management (not the cure) of disease. Medical insurance pays for drugs, supplies, and equipment – not for cures. Thus, this writing should be taken as a deep desire by the BEAST to be in on “the action” of what will surely be around 30% of the entire GDP of the United States by 2019. And remember, government is a major shareholder of all health care and pharmaceutical corporations, and will be very happy with the return on investment obtained from requiring all citizens to obtain health insurance. Of course, no government should own shares in a company that it then regulates the very market for which those companies do business in. This is a major conflict of interest. And this is why this social insurance scheme will offer the worst kind of health care possible. Government will make more profit and dividends from its investments if its investment held insurance companies don’t pay for expensive medical procedures. A smart solution for the people would be to open a statewide-only insurance company, where no interstate commerce is conducted so no Federal Commerce clause interference would be justified. This concept could be applied to all instances of interstate commerce, for inner-state commerce would be regulated only by the state.
(C) The requirement, together with the other provisions of this Act, will add millions of new consumers to the health insurance market, increasing the supply of, and demand for, health care services, and will increase the number and share of Americans who are insured.
(D) The requirement achieves near-universal coverage by building upon and strengthening the private employer-based health insurance system, which covers 176,000,000 Americans nationwide. In Massachusetts, a similar requirement has strengthened private employer-based coverage: despite the economic downturn, the number of workers offered employer-based coverage has actually increased.
Author’s note: Again we can see that this is not nationalized or socialized health care, but rather forced purchase of insurance. This fuzzy logic makes no provisions for the corruption of the insurance industry or for the ways in which it “manages” health care by denying treatment, services, or medication.
(E) The economy loses up to $207,000,000,000 a year because of the poorer health and shorter lifespan of the uninsured. By significantly reducing the number of the uninsured, the requirement, together with the other provisions of this Act, will significantly reduce this economic cost.
(F) The cost of providing uncompensated care to the uninsured was $43,000,000,000 in 2008. To pay for this cost, health care providers pass on the cost to private insurers, which pass on the cost to families. This cost-shifting increases family premiums by on average over $1,000 a year. By significantly reducing the number of the uninsured, the requirement, together with the other provisions of this Act, will lower health insurance premiums.
(G) 62 percent of all personal bankruptcies are caused in part by medical expenses. By significantly increasing health insurance coverage, the requirement, together with the other provisions of this Act, will improve financial security for families.
Author’s note: Again, we see that people are being considered by the BEAST here as commodities; as human capital. The BEAST is not concerned that people have poor health or a shorter lifespan, only with the fact that its investment held economy is losing a potential of over $207 billion dollars per year on the “uninsured”. This is literally profit over people. And again this CODE does not stop what is listed in paragraph (F) in any way, referring to medical treatment of people without insurance as “uncompensated care”. For if the private insurance company denies the coverage for an expensive drug or procedure – and they will – there will be just as much liability put on all other citizens to pay for these uncompensated care incidences via their forced insurance payments. Thus, citizens will still be declaring just as many bankruptcies. After all, when faced with obtaining life-saving medical care or the risk of bankruptcy, most people will lose everything to choose to stay alive.
(H) Under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.), the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 201 et seq.), and this Act, the Federal Government has a significant role in regulating health insurance. The requirement (forced insurance) is an essential part of this larger regulation of economic activity, and the absence of the requirement (forced insurance) would undercut Federal regulation of the health insurance market.
(I) Under sections 2704 and 2705 of the Public Health Service Act [42 U.S.C. 300gg–3, 300gg–4] (as added by section 1201 of this Act), if there were no requirement, many individuals would wait to purchase health insurance until they needed care. By significantly increasing health insurance coverage, the requirement (forced insurance), together with the other provisions of this Act, will minimize this adverse selection and broaden the health insurance risk pool to include healthy individuals, which will lower health insurance premiums. The requirement (forced insurance) is essential to creating effective health insurance markets in which improved health insurance products that are guaranteed issue and do not exclude coverage of pre-existing conditions can be sold.
Author’s note: By requiring healthy people to obtain health insurance, the people that have been made ill by pharmaceuticals and poor health and diet choices will be able to pump trillions of dollars into the medical industry to keep the cycle of bad medical practices (also regulated and approved by the BEAST) to continue, treating symptoms but not disease for profit, while making a killing off of investing all citizens insurance payments in the stock and security markets via insurance company investment funds.
(J) Administrative costs for private health insurance, which were $90,000,000,000 in 2006, are 26 to 30 percent of premiums in the current individual and small group markets. By significantly increasing health insurance coverage and the size of purchasing pools, which will increase economies of scale, the requirement (forced insurance), together with the other provisions of this Act, will significantly reduce administrative costs and lower health insurance premiums. The requirement is essential to creating effective health insurance markets that do not require underwriting and eliminate its associated administrative costs.
(3) Supreme Court ruling
In United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Association (322 U.S. 533 (1944)), the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that insurance is interstate commerce subject to Federal regulation.
Again, we see that this act does not improve or regulate health care in any way whatsoever, but refers solely to the administrative costs of the health insurance markets being reduced by forcing citizens to purchase health insurance. In short, this is the “forced commerce” of citizens into the private sector – forcing citizens to buy private insurance against their will. And in the process of regulation and interstate commerce, the BEAST will make the final decision on which insurance companies live or die based on which ones it allows the people to purchase their health insurance from. Do you have a doubt that the auto, life, and other insurance schemes are not soon to follow? After all, you must do what your license to drive forces you to do in order to keep on driving…
-≈-
The International Social Security Association (ISSA):
-≈-
And last but not least, on to the most important aspect of this grand scheme. In order to understand the true nature of what the MARK and the NUMBER of the BEAST called Social Security is, you must understand that this system is international, and is being implemented on a global scale. And more importantly, it is being promoted and regulated by the United Nations.
For instance, China has a program that is also called the “Social Security System” of China.
You can read about its history from the CATO Institute, here:
Other countries (over 130 of them) have similar social security programs:
Did you know that Kiefer Sutherland’s grandfather introduced universal public health care in Canada?
For those of you familiar with Agenda 21 United Nations sustainable development language, you will no doubt recognize it in this video, produced by the International Social Security Administration (ISSA), and narrated by Mr. Sutherland:
Amazingly, no doubt due to the purposefully induced ignorance of almost the entire global population, this important video (to the whole world) has been online since December of 2010 – and yet it has only received 1,896 views on YouTube. This is a testament to the clandestine work being done in the United Nations, and the massive efforts to direct people’s attention away from it through horrific media entertainment and news soundbites.
We find that the United Nations is very keen on the concept of “Social Security”, and we can see the manifestation of this global desire to implement this “social welfare” and “social justice” program in Article 22 of the “Universal Declaration of Human Rights”, which states that:
“Everyone, as a member of society, has the right to social security and is entitled to realization, through national effort and international co-operation and in accordance with the organization and resources of each State, of the economic, social and cultural rights indispensable for his dignity and the free development of his personality.”
It is also very important to point out that, according to the official website of the United States Social Security System, the United States is very much a part of the ISSA, with international treaties with many countries:
(Source: http://www.ssa.gov/international/agreements_overview.html)
Since the late 1970′s, the United States has established a network of bilateral Social Security agreements that coordinate the U.S. Social Security program with the comparable programs of other countries. This article gives a brief overview of the agreements and should be of particular interest to multinational companies and to people who work abroad during their careers.
International Social Security agreements, often called “Totalization agreements,” have two main purposes. First, they eliminate dual Social Security taxation, the situation that occurs when a worker from one country works in another country and is required to pay Social Security taxes to both countries on the same earnings. Second, the agreements help fill gaps in benefit protection for workers who have divided their careers between the United States and another country.
Agreements to coordinate Social Security protection across national boundaries have been common in Western Europe for decades. Following is a list of the agreements the United States has concluded and the date of the entry into force of each. Some of these agreements were subsequently revised; the date shown is the date the original agreement entered into force.
|
Country
|
Entry into Force |
|---|---|
| November 1, 1978 | |
| December 1, 1979 | |
| November 1, 1980 | |
| July 1, 1984 | |
| July 1, 1984 | |
| August 1, 1984 | |
| January 1, 1985 | |
| January 1, 1987 | |
| April 1, 1988 | |
| July 1, 1988 | |
| August 1, 1989 | |
| November 1, 1990 | |
| November 1, 1991 | |
| November 1, 1992 | |
| September 1, 1993 | |
| November 1, 1993 | |
| September 1, 1994 | |
| April 1, 2001 | |
| December 1, 2001 | |
| October 1, 2002 | |
| October 1, 2005 | |
| October 1, 2008 | |
| January 1, 2009 | |
| March 1, 2009 |
And so we can see that the BEAST has truly laid its MARK on a large part of the world’s population, and that number is increasing with each passing year…
What is the ISSA?
From its website:
Promoting and Developing Social Security Worldwide
The International Social Security Association is the principal international institution bringing together social security agencies and organizations. The ISSA’s aim is to promote dynamic social security as the social dimension in a globalizing world by supporting excellence in social security administration. Founded in 1927, the ISSA has its headquarters at the International Labour Office, in Geneva.
Author’s note: It is important to note here that the original United States Social Security Act was not passed until 1935 – fully 8 years after the ISSA was founded. Hopefully the impact of this realization is as astounding to you as it was to me.
The ISSA provides access to information, expert advice, business standards, practical guidelines and platforms for members to build and promote dynamic social security systems worldwide. The vision of dynamic social security provides a framework for the ISSA’s action.
Dynamic social security refers to social security systems that are accessible, sustainable, adequate, socially inclusive and economically productive, and that are based on performing, well-governed, proactive and innovative social security institutions. In line with the nature of the ISSA as an association of social security institutions, the vision of promoting dynamic social security ties social security improvements to the capacities and performance of these institutions.
This effort is very much supported by the World Bank:
The Social Protection Unit, as part of the Human Development Network, supports the World Bank and client countries to assist individuals, households and communities to better manage the income and welfare risks that affect vulnerable groups. The unit is charged with developing concepts and strategies for Social Protection policy and with carrying out support functions to operational work, largely in the areas of Disability, Labor Markets, Pensions, Safety Nets, and Social Funds. In all these areas, the unit provides operational support to the Regions and leadership for strategy development and results, knowledge management, training, and development of partnerships.
What is the “Human Development Network”?
The Human Development Network is the World Bank’s home for 
policy, programs and research in the fields of Education, Health, Nutrition & Population (HNP), Social Protection & Labor, Children & Youth, HIV/AIDS, and Development Dialogue.Its mission is to assist low and middle income country governments individually and collectively increase the inclusive and efficient investment in people, with a view of driving faster and more equitable growth. The human development network is dedicated to actively participate in global efforts that contribute to poverty reduction through improving access to education, health and social services and to build balanced and competitive societies.
Author’s note: It is personally unsettling to me that this organization, which drives itself on growth and investment capital gains, is also so heavily involved in “HIV/AIDS” and “Nutrition and Population” efforts. One must consider the benefits of population control and of shortening the life expectancy of a global citizenship that is forced to participate in the international Social Security investment funds – especially when those funds don’t pay old-age benefits (liabilities) if the people don’t grow old enough to claim them… or are never born into the system due to population control organizations of the United Nations using forced sterilization through vaccination. In other words, in a system where people become a liability in a for-profit social insurance fund, it is in the best interest of the for-profit fund to not pay its liabilities – by not being required to due to “natural occurrences”.
And just what does the World Bank define as a “Social Fund”?
Social Funds are multi-sectoral programs that finance small projects targeted to benefit a country’s poor and vulnerable groups based on a participatory manner of demand generated by local groups and screened against a set of eligibility criteria.
Social Fund programs are demand-driven and aim to involve the active participation of several local actors (communities and community-based organizations, NGOs, local governments) with the ultimate goal of addressing the needs of poor and vulnerable communities while contributing to social capital and empowerment at the local level.
Social Funds’ institutional frameworks, targeting, selection criteria, rules for processing projects and contracting vary greatly. Some SFs are fairly centralized, while others work in collaboration with or through local governments; some give funds to community groups for implementation, other to local governments, and others contract third parties on behalf of the communities.
Social Funds are usually managed by a semi-autonomous government body that appraises and supervises the implementation of sub-projects. In several countries, SFs have served as innovators and demonstrators of new methods of decentralized participatory decision-making, management, and accountability that may be adopted for broader application by public sector organizations.
Social Funds Evolution and Objectives
First generation social funds, launched in the mid to late 1980s, were created to serve as short-term safety nets to soften the impact of structural adjustment policies on the poor. These programs were used in more than 60 countries and aimed at providing emergency relief by creating temporary employment and improving income. These initial programs were assumed to have a short life span.
In recent years, Social Funds have adopted more explicit institutional strategies aimed at empowerment, capacity building, and sustainability goals with a focus on longer-term objectives. They have played an important role in funding community projects, empowering communities, building linkages between communities and their local governments. More recently, Social Funds have also become valuable instruments in governments’ decentralization processes by giving local governments a greater role in Social Fund sub-project cycles. (Translation: privatization)
-≈-
So what does this all mean?
Many things, of course. But if you take nothing out of this tome of research, please understand this:
You are the sole beneficiary of your own enslavement through your participation in this system. You have voluntarily taken the MARK of the BEAST by accepting and contracting with the BEAST via your NUMBER in all contracts, both private and public. You have voluntarily submitted your children to the BEAST by voluntarily consenting to the acceptance of the NUMBER to MARK your children as property of the BEAST. And through the use of its demons in its empire called the American BAR Association, you you have no legal recourse to do anything about it…
…Unless you stop participating in the system.
…Unless you withdraw your consent.
…And unless you throw off the NUMBER, which is the MARK of the BEAST.
And remember, God only helps those who help themselves be free.
.
Like what you just read? Please consider making a donation so that I can keep this up, at: http://clint4p.com/
.
–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Tuesday, April 24, 2012
elwad (@elwadmasri)
/ April 24, 2012wow
This is excellent work!
You are right on with this. Will spead
MICHAEL DARREN
/ April 29, 2012http://real-world-news.org/numerics/english-gematria.html
http://landmarkbiblebaptist.net/666-888.html
You have no idea how accurate this is. Please look at the above links and research english gematria . Where you will see such things as how to calculate the following
SSNUMBER=666
USOFAMERICIA=666
PAYTAXES=666
COMPUTER=666
MARK OF BEAST= 666
CODE OF THE BIBLE =666
MICHAEL DARREN =666
Bruce
/ April 24, 2012Hi Clint, another daring and fascinating post – though seems there’s a typo in your authors note under section 18091: “And this is why this social insurance scheme will offer the worse kind of health care possible.” – think that should be “worst.” I wonder if you’re going to get into remedies at any point, like stepping OUT of consent to prima facie law. Doesn’t make sense to me that doing that should involve a raft of arcane legal shinanigans under the jurisdiction of “The State.” Seems like you’re hip to Marc Stevens work, so just WTF is this “State” thing?
realitybloger
/ April 25, 2012Unfortunately, every time you spend a dollar you consent to FED rules and taxes. Every time you sign a drivers license, you consent to the vehicle code. Every time you sign a bank’s signature card, you consented to a contract regarding the whole banking scheme. Civil Service, military, and registering to vote (which legitimizes elections) all confer consent.
The remedy… withdraw all signatures.
But then you get no State services.
Let's Get Honest
/ November 8, 2012I’m posting CAFRs and have been reporting various slush funds etc. through welfare (Dept of HHS). In the front of most (all?) CAFRs is usually a diagram of the branches and agencies of government. It’s clear they are tipped towards the Executive Office (whether state or federal), which is the least representative. I have gone beyond believing the problem is “them,” I believe (as it says above) the problem is “us,” meaning passive acceptance of the status quo. From what I can see HHS is used as a stepping point (in every state) for systems change, in the name of “Healthy Humans.” It’s forcing change from the top-down.
The first step of this –and I can view it thru the HHS grants system) is to “take the money and run.” it’s a model shared at the association or national discourse level (various trade associations) and then there IS enough wealth behind it (from foundations — the basic powerful ones, plus many others who specialize in different areas of leadership) and then inflicted on us, who don’t read the blueprints often enough. But people who follow the money, will eventually find the blueprints.
This is a fantastic post, and I’m still reading the printout (but reblogged it today).
What the CAFRs seem to show is that the pooled investments (CALPers, etc.) are doing is investing internationally, currency trading, etc, playing the markets, investing literally in other governments — while the US/IRS itself goes internationally after individual citizens who dare to do the same thing, to tax their income.
I also want to let people know another way to take a look at what the gov’t is spending (contracts, etc.) is through “FEDMINE.us”
http://fedmine.us/fedmine/FEDMINE_FedCircle_Market_Segments.html
this is daily collated information. Click on the main site (after the link above) and check out the daily contracts. For example, YTD, the federal government (such as it be — US Treasury?) has over $60 million of contracts with (or is it “under”) the Social Security Administration.
In looking at the grants, you see that the first thing the HHS or DOJ does in pushing some policy is dump the money into the infrastructure for promoting it — websites, train-the-trainers, clearinghouses, resource centers. Then they go after some dumb, gullible, or (like them) corrupt (or easy to blackmail) market segment [such as people in prison, a captive audience], sell them on it, and set up a federally run affiliate relationship, for profit. While calling this “social services” when it’s not. It’s simply marketing.
I’ll tell you — I’m terrified. I don’t have the income base, assets, job stability (thanks to the courts system), etc.
I am working on some fundraising to publicize these things a little better, but again, if you buy and sell in this country as a CITIZEN, to do it legally, you have to go through the SSA. If you do it as a CITIZEN illegally, then you are at risk.
So how does one really resign the straw man, without actually exiting the land — is it possible? (i’m still reading those posts). Anyhow, check out fedmine.us if you want a little scope. people can sign up for a 3-day trial for free and study specific corporations. I believe the largest corporations on the planet are probably pharmaceuticals — and they are pervasive at all levels of government. level 2, mental health providers at every level of the system..
Sorry about my long comments; I tend to be a brainstormer type of thinker, when not going a@nal-retentive on a specific area.
Another site (I think probably theone that led me here; this site is much more “audio/visual” — I’m a musician but when it comes to processing this sort of information, I do better with words & logic as you’re laying out (beautifully) here.
http //musicians4freedom (dot) com/politics-philosophy/we-are-people-not-puppets/what-is-the-new-world-order/
http //www(dot)usavsus(.)info/
etc.
Mark
/ April 24, 2012Hi Clint, I would like to have you on our radio show to discuss this topic…how do I contact you?
realitybloger
/ April 25, 2012clint@cafr1.com
afteramerica
/ April 24, 2012Reblogged this on AfterAmerica's Blog and commented:
Check out this research. Good stuff. Social Security? Hmmm, neither is it social nor secure.
Joe
/ April 25, 2012The invisible SOLDIER is on its way back his name is hot molted lava from the oven down in the deep .
You can avoid the wrath of nature by praying to gravity that it will relieve the gravity of the earth for awhile then you and the elites or criminals have a chance to maybe live a few extra days .especially for those whom had the idea of saving dry foods water and natural heirloom seeds that produce veggies in thirty days . .
Essential needs, ammo , flame thrower , food , and water .
Clint ! When there is a mans right involvement the legislatures cant be making any rule making over his rights .
what that means to you read the law of higher education and see what the law professor’s have done with human rights !!
We The People need to get together once a week and and discuss , talk , teach , study the U S Constitution and please compare 11 th amendment with Article 3 Section 2 . can anyone spot the conflict ? and witch of the two prevails ?if you understand that then ask one of those criminals or all of them why did the supreme court rule that in favor of the eleventh am. when the founding Fathers rejected the 11th. to start with ? if you want to learn more about the other conflict with the rest of the amendment feel free to contact me Thank You
Let's Get Honest
/ November 8, 2012When I saw that Eleventh Amendment in (In)action — in various states — I began to understand how ridiculous it was for me to have thought that police, law enforcement (etc.) were there to protect, as opposed to collect. It takes a while to synthesize enough to “get” the basic issues.
I sought protection from an individual I was married to (which may put me at odds with some of the readers here), but it wasn’t through criminal courts (though it could’ve been) but civil. I see that this was a set-up to then bounce it to the custody courts where much more money is made (for the house, not the people) and which is a way of also up front (in any case) for the courts to find out who else in the family (tribe) has money — like elderly parents, etc., as seen by forcing the income and expense statements, plus of course if someone paid initially for an attorney, that side has some assets. The court will then play to the opposite side, it seems. In my situation, this went on for over ten years and forced me BACK on food stamps kicking and screaming (having been on it initially for perhaps, like three months, max).
The other matter regarding the courts is that there are no longer (in any state) it seems grand juries not controlled by the judicial sector itself; this was replaced by commissions, etc. If there are grand juries, they are on a leash. Meanwhile, competent men and women who have been attorneys are simply getting disbarred for being too ethical, too smart, or for refusing to worship at the same throne. I’ve conversed with a few, read about others.
I think that the primary issue is how to remove previously donated “UNinformed consent” to receive services from USA, Inc. People who are still doing OK by this system believe they are on solid ground, but it’s really flotsam, and do not appreciate many times, having it shown, “that’s flotsam & jetsam you’re relying on.”
I would like to discuss constitution weekly (minus the talk of flame-throwers & survivalism; I have an open legal case), but if it doesn’t apply to us anyhow, what is the point? I am reachable through my blog; the main one now is “Cold,Hard.Fact$” [where CAFrs are going up] although the larger one is on the family courts.
Thanks. Gravatar the same for both; this comment at least, a click on image leads to the CHF one…
smith
/ April 25, 2012dude, I’m sorry but you seem to miss the central point of Social Security treaties. The freaking objective is proevent DOUBLE TAXATION and citizens acess to the benefits they’ve been setting aside while working in MORE THAN ONE country. so you’ve got one long useless rant.
Sure, America has a problem with DNA databases…your work is better when it’s focused.
realitybloger
/ April 25, 2012No, dude, the objective of global Social Security and treaties is globally regulated and forced taxation – revenue generation.
It is to place all people into a global database.
It is to force those people to buy private corporate products and insurance schemes.
Apparently, you missed the entire article if you think I missed the double taxation aspect. Think outside the box, debt-slave.
CrimReaper
/ April 26, 2012So you are one of those people – “think outside the box, debt-slave.” I might have had a shred of respect for you and your work, but with that childish response the shred became less than a sliver.
The fun part will be when said Anti-Christ walks amongst the flea-pickers, and you will continue to disbelieve – all the better
Fun times ahead.
realitybloger
/ April 26, 2012Was there a point I even talked about “believing” or the “return”?
Religion is not God.
five words
/ April 25, 2012You are catching on and catching up at an accelerated pace. Welcome to the monfort lane.
Happy Trails, . . .
Odin Wild Hunt
/ April 25, 2012the Keifer video is trickery Clint, now if only the corporation of the UN could retract Agenda 21, this might have some teeth.Unfortunatly the Rothchilds have not planned to create money from nothing, only to keep all ageing humas alive, that used to be the case. But between now and 2050, they want us dead. Not so good.
Randy Brown
/ April 26, 2012The Mark of the beast is on the right hand or forehead litterally.Liked The article In general
ts gordon
/ April 26, 2012This too, shall pass. Personally, I like the: ‘Total global financial collapse’ -scenarios that generally render these grand impositions moot. Especially as we are increasingly educating the poor about the real nature of their enslavement!
~ In my day, we just adopted the good old Bob Dylan adage: “To live outside the law you must be honest.” Of course, any truly spiritual path has little effectiveness against the rigorous ‘catch-22′s implemented by said [title #666] “Beast!”
Whatever became of that ‘legalese dude’ in Vegas who’s offices they plowed into rubble the night before they took down the Twin Towers?
Eric-Gunther:Oberhauser
/ April 26, 2012It is all from the ANTI-CHRIST system and put into place by the ANTI-CHRIST jews. THEY ARE THE ANTI-CHRIST .
al
/ April 26, 2012If you know the Holy Bible so well then you would know better that to spew such nonsense. GOD is clear on the future actual living person of the antichrist. You sir, deny GOD’s word not knowing prophecy.
realitybloger
/ April 26, 2012The legal definition of a person is a corporation.
Did the Bible predict that?
Jonathon
/ April 26, 2012While this is a very good article, it doesn’t complete the discussion on HOW to leave the system. Yes, you say withdraw signatures and things like that but THEN WHAT? Just go plant yourself in the woods and die? If you always get stopped by the police every day for not having a license plate on your car, can’t fly to another country without a passport, can’t buy food without using those Fed notes, then how in the world do those who have “withdrawn” from the system actually live on a day-to-day basis? I have never seen anyone in real life who has done this. And everytime someone writes about this, I am frustrated that they NEVER say how they are doing it. I always thought that accepting the Mark of the Beast required an awareness that you are denying Christ in accepting it.
realitybloger
/ April 26, 2012I can introduce you to someone who has, very simply, become a non-citizen while not losing rights.
You can also officially “expatriate” via US CODE, though I don’t suggest this route.
The Beurrough of Land Management (BLM) doesn’t own land, it is the caretaker of unoccupied lands. These lands can be claimed for mining and other purposes.
There is also the STRAWMAN approach. (See my articles)
-Clint-
jeff
/ April 26, 2012I’d sure like to know more about that someone who departed the system without losing rights. I’ve seen a few who tried but suffered constant attacks. Look forward to hearing more.
Wes
/ April 26, 2012Can anyone who has any shred of honesty and awareness possible believe that by serving the present system, in any way; that they are in any shape or form following the teachings of Christ? Deep down, you have to know that Christ would vomit if he were forced for one moment to submit to the abomination that we can normal daily life in America. Most so called “Christians” don’t want to look at their sick perverted lives and admit that they serve the devil daily. Living truly as Christ instructed, which lets be honest, would in fact entail being economically ostracized these days, is just to damned hard. Besides, it’s just not very nice giving up all the nice little toys that the system offers. I agree with the basic assumptions of the author. The beast is alive and well and everyone I know is serving”him”. The US government, which is the master of all lesser governments and the chief instrument of those who control the UN, FED and IMF, perfectly fits the descriptions in Revolution. “Who can make war against him”? For those who are to closed minded to see the matter from a different angle from what they got in Sunday School, just keep right on sleep walking. I believe Revelations had something to say about you as well.
JG
/ April 26, 2012Your information is very sound, however, it does leave me in a personal quandary (if there are typos, please overlook) If indeed the SSN is the Mark, where does that leave the multiplied millions that have already taken it? Biblically speaking we are now guilty without the possibility of forgiveness if we are to believe the word of God. Rev. Ch: 14 spells out our punishment. God’s word is usually more “literal” than we give credit. When God has warned that this Mark, the “Mark of the Beast” will be placed “in” the hand (imlpies the whole arm), or “in” the head (mentally if one has no limbs) could the “implanted microchip” not be the actual surrender to Satan’s system, the UN? If your assessment is correct then why would millions continue to worship and serve God when their fate has already been sealed according to God’s word? Technically, those of us who have a SSN now belong lock, stock, and barrel to Satan (the system, aka the UN) with no means to escape, even if we now deny the system, we have already bought into the “system.” As a long time student of prophecy, what am I now to tell those I witness to?
Would a truthful and righteous God permit us to walk blindly into hell? That would be Satan’s modus operandi.
Although keeping abreast of the aforementioned information is my daily cup of tea, and that I have followed for many years many of the facts you have stated, I must admit that if indeed the SSN is the “Mark of the Beast” of Revelation, then multiplied millions of Americans, not counting other nations, are destined for a literal burning “lake of fire.” You quoted Revelation precisely, except as many people do, you failed to mention one extremely important thing, and that is, all who have now taken the “Mark,” (SSN) are already doomed and we might as well live any way we wish, hell won’t be any hotter. Please read what most (even most preachers and bible teachers) prefer not to mention, that once the “Mark” is taken, there is NO redemption or forgiveness from God, our fates have been sealed as far as God’s word declares: The following is in conjunction with Revelation Chapter 13.
Revelation 14:9 And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead, or in his hand, 10 The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb: 11 And the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever: and they have no rest day nor night, who worship the beast and his image, and whosoever receiveth the mark of his name. 12 Here is the patience of the saints: here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus.
realitybloger
/ April 26, 2012Then consider this… Before the MARK can be physically given, it must represent something. The microchip as a MARK means the MARK cannot be forged. It’s not just a mark in the form of a bun or tattoo, it is a scan-able chip. The SS System is like a gateway drug that is already being put in microchips and RFID’s in credit cards, license plates, and other “citizen” documents.
This is all happening before any of us can even know what it means, when we are children of a complaint populace of parents. We have no choice.
When the chips become morphed into the MARK that is embedded on the right hand or forehead, that will be a choice. And we are getting very close to those times.
Wes
/ April 26, 2012You have a good point but I would ask you and others this…..are you prepared to refuse the chip, knowing you AND your spouse and children can’t work at gainful employment, can’t own a home or car, can’t buy food(just what will your kids eat?), can’t even buy fuel or cloths to stay warm with. All this and more, while the chip will be portrayed as a good thing and so easy to go along with. As just a formality to streamline our current lifestyles. I don’t believe that 95% of families can survive such a scenario for even a moderate period of time of a few months. I don’t believe that 95% of Christians today will refuse the chip when the “choice” is in front of them. As the author has stated, we are all there now in principle, if not in fact. Without the SS number, we are basically reduced to vagrants at best. Does a chip really make that much difference? Aren’t we already “serving” the beast? Kind of like shacking up before getting married…………..
Paul Bethke
/ May 1, 2012“Where does that leave the multiple millions who have already taken it?” In order to be saved, they must repent of that. Turn around and forsake the systems of men and seek the kingdom of God, and His righteousness. If they have been permitted to “walk blindly”, their eyes must be opened so they can see the error of their ways. Articles like this are an attempt to do just that, but it is encumbant on the people to hear and see. They may need help with their unbelief. That help can be your witness.
Larry T.
/ April 26, 2012Your legal analysis is right on. And I agree that the SS # is the link to the beast. Whether it is an individual person that is the Antichrist/head of the beast is not important. They that have the mark will worship the beast. You err in your premise of the “Free Will” of man. The will of man is subject to his fallen nature. The will of man is corrupt in that it is subject to his corrupt thinking and skewed emotions. It will necessitate the intervention of the God of heaven to save man in the end. That does not mean that we should just sit back and wait for God to do something, but it will play out the way God intends in the end. He tells us that in the Bible that you quote.
realitybloger
/ April 26, 2012And yet, how could all of this have happened without man being fallen? How else but induced and purposeful ignorance could this system have been set up?
Greg
/ April 26, 2012You are actually dead on point, of the first beast of Revelation. It is the the actual world government, coming together under the influence of Satan, to enslave the world into this fantasized global utopia.
Now, some “wound” happens to this beast as stated in Revelations, then the 2nd beast comes in and saves the day. This 2nd beast is Satan himself posing as the Messiah, not some person setup as the antichrist. He performs miracles, so that even the very elect could be fooled. He’s not some evil dude going around lopping of heads, that would fool noone. He will appear to be Jesus to Christians, Allah to Muslims etc. Anti simply means imposter, not evil. His appearing good, is why even brother/sisters/family will be turning each other over to the beast. They want to save their family member’s souls. Basically, they thing they are doing a good thing.
Your points above are well said, and would help one to escape the powers of the FIRST beast, but once Satan (as 2nd beast) arrives on the scene, a choice is to be made. He has but a short time, and knows this. He has the ultimate goal, of getting you to worship him as God. That’s all he wants and will deceive many to get this done.
In the KJV version of the Bible it states IN the forehead, but most other versions state ON the forehead. Big differences between the two, and this is no honest mistake. Basically, worshiping Satan “with your brains”, thinking it is Jesus himself, is the mark IN the forehead.
Hard to get real in depth with this in a few paragraphs, but certainly can if someone wishes to contact me directly. There is a reason that doctrines like the “rapture” are gaining so much steam. Satan infiltrated the seminaries long ago, and what better way to deceive than from within. Many will worship this 2nd beast, as Jesus himself, cause they are expecting the nice guy to be here first.
Well, when would you least expect Jesus to be coming? When you think he is already here.
realitybloger
/ April 26, 2012In the forehead could very simply be translated to scaler technology, the kind that Russia just recently announced that will mind control their victims. It has been stated many times that Project Bluebeam will be the voice of Jesus to Christians, Allah to Muslims, etc. through this technology. Science fiction isn’t fiction anymore…
Melanie
/ April 26, 2012The mark of the beast is religious, it is nothing to do with the NWO or the Social Security system, etc. Otherwise however, this article is just one more piece of the puzzle. According to the Bible, this is a war between Christ and Satan and of each of us deciding for either of them. You can’t just slap “666″ on something and call it the “mark of the beast”, we are told to COUNT the number, you have to start somewhere and count to get to 666, and it takes special wisdom, not just looking up a section in an act somewhere. It is a religious issue.
Paul Bethke
/ May 1, 2012Social Security *is* religion. Religion is defined as how you take care of the needy of society. Doesn’t that sound a lot like Social Security (and welfare, universal health care…)? When you view what the government does in that light, the religious aspects become quite clear. Now you have the choice – religion of man or religion of God?
realitybloger
/ May 1, 2012Interestingly, Methodism was an attempt to get the Church of England to go back to helping the poor and needy, and the term Methodist was a derogatory one.
Dudley
/ April 26, 2012“One of the greatest misconceptions of biblical” understanding is your ridiculous and illogical, straw-argument loaded essay on the Mark of the Beast. You’re not even bright enough to realize Revelation was not written for any person alive today, or that its translation is earmarked with hundreds of errors and mistakes.
Yet you built an entire series of conjecture and straw arguments around you misconceptions and “interpretations”.
Some “truth” you are sharing here, which we should “ridicule” and “oppose”. It is indeed “self-evident” to any critical thinking person (who has done their research) that your specious claims are quite absurd.
Such allegations and claims have been made many, many countless times before by fundamentalists (including myself, admittedly), with most of them never to be retracted. Yet the so-called “proof” (events) never materialized either. Nor will they, because your tapestry of deception and misunderstanding simply isn’t accurate.
Your concerns however, of national and world developments, concern us all, but it is not the Mark of the Beast.
realitybloger
/ April 26, 2012What an un-Christian, unhelpful comment. Thanks.
Neil
/ April 26, 2012The scriptures tell us quite plainly that we will all be marked!
But the wo’s are pronounced on those who “Worship the Beast”
Arminius
/ April 26, 2012Things will be better after the second American Revolution!
dave
/ April 26, 2012The devil ALWAYS reveals himself IF people care to witness. Pay very close attention to the words “process”, “enumeration” and “enumeration at birth” in the following link: http://www.ssa.gov/open/data/Enumeration-Accuracy.html
The enumeration of people was a non expiring war crime of the Nazi’s.
So we have a near identical descriptor…a “process”…a process involves a specific plan and goal. You can rest assured that PROCESS does not involve freedom.
Now look at this:
http://socialsecuritynumber.wetpaint.com/
JUST SAY NO. Enough people saying NO and we can all have a lot more freedom. And no….There is NO LAW requiring people to have an SSN to work. The IRS pamphlet’s the courts have ruled cannot be relied upon…yet they try to convince employers they have the right to DEMAND a number on forms of government. Want the truth? They only have the right to SOLICIT…ASK.
realitybloger
/ April 26, 2012Thanks for the links!
john
/ April 27, 2012If you really WANT to know the truth of anti-christ then go here http://godfire.net/eby/2/antichrist/antichrist1.htm
dave
/ April 27, 2012Ponder this thought every time you sign a form of government “under penalty of perjury”. Such forms include applications for SSN and the W4 and famous Form 1040. Ever wonder why no one from government will fill out a form back to you signed that way? Look up the penalty for perjury and you will know why! Yet you are the supposed master of govt. aren’t you? Now listen close!! Every year people are violating what Jesus warns them about in this passage on ENTRAPMENT oaths: “”"”But I tell you, do not swear an oath at all: either by heaven, for it is God’s throne; or by the earth, for it is his footstool; or by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the Great King. And do not swear by your head, for you cannot make even one hair white or black. All you need to say is simply ‘Yes’ or ‘No’; anything beyond this comes from the evil one.”"”" I’ve had idiotic pastors tell me this section referred to cursing. Sure….Jesus was that stupid eh? Yeah right…he saw all those people swearing allegiance and being thus enslaved to the other masters and decided to make this passage about cursing. Sure…right…not. You see Jesus was WARNING about entrapment oaths put there by those in so-called authority who try to USURP your relationship to the one true master of truth by making you think THEY are your master …and having you agree to it. Notice he told you about these people who “make’ you sign such forms: For anything MORE is from the evil one.
Flash Gordon
/ May 1, 2012A lot of rubbish being spouted on here. That Jesuit who brought in Futurism to the church has a lot to answer for. His fanatical (but selective) literal approach to understanding the book of Revelation has caused generations of believers to be carried away with false doctrine.
The Mark of the Beast differentiates those who belong to Jesus Christ, and has nothing to do with implanted microchips. If compulsary microchips were introduced, many unbelievers will refuse it, yet they’re not justified. Likewise, many believers will queue up willingly and get the implants, yet they’re justified.
Any view of Revelation which concludes that it describes ‘sheep’ on one side and ‘anti New World Order activists’ on the other is false. The truth movement correctly identifies that there are those whose eyes have been opened to the machinations of the NWO elite. However, this is not the division which matters the most. The real divide is between saved and lost, elect and reprobate. Christians should be careful to remember this.
If you think the Mark does not have a spiritual meaning, you’re probably a Futurist, and you’ve been robbed of the real purpose of Revelation, which is comforting the brethren throughout all ages.
Throw those Barry Smith/Hal Lindsay books and DVDs away, or change churches. ‘Revelation’ by Charles Alexander is recommended.
I see Clint quotes from the book of Mormon, the book of an antichrist religion. And saying that God can’t save us from this or that shows he has no real understanding of the sovereignty of God. While the world conspires together, the Lord sits in the heavens, laughing, as all his purposes come to pass. He allows the NWO to advance so that his purpose is carried out.
The believer can fight for truthfulness in government. That’s a good thing. But it should come very much second place to the cause of the gospel. The majority of the anti-NWO truth seekers in this world are lost, and need Jesus Christ as much as the architects of the corrupt system.
realitybloger
/ May 1, 2012The arrogance of people who claim to “know” God and His will or intent always amazes me.
And it seems that one who claims such impossible knowledge also cannot see through his own arrogance to see the real message of this writing. You sound like you might be the guy that ignores the raft, the boat, and the Coast Guard helicopter that comes to save you and ultimately drowns from the flood while swearing that God will provide safety.
Honestly, don’t let your one of 1239 world religions who are all “right” get in the way of the facts presented here.
cornelius
/ May 3, 2012This site is great for making me hate forked tongue paleskins.Then the fun part happens at home depot where i slam into every paleskini ,i adjust my path making sure not to miss one of you .
realitybloger
/ May 6, 2012Hmmm… please restate your disposition. I.E. What the hell did you say?
Daynes
/ May 12, 2012I’m not sure why everyone is taking this analogy so literally? The bible is a book, a story, published by the same people who have created SS and all other elements that control our lives. It is a tool for distraction, a scapegoat, so the people will blame good or evil personified and not the true evil at the top. And it is working just as planned even in these comments! What’s happening in our world has been desired and planned by the elite for many hundreds of years. Did anyone stop and think that it is they who “predicted” the apocalypse because they are creating it?? Read between the lines, look beyond the words. Clint I think your analogy is bang on. I have long believed the “devil” is the deliberate evil which controls our societies and religion is used to divide and distract.
Nicklas Arthur
/ May 14, 2012much good here-eat the meat, spit out the bones
https://vimeo.com/41897223
Nicklas Arthur
/ May 14, 2012http://vimeo.com/41897223
Big M
/ May 16, 2012Just for reference’s sake, the use of the word “shall” in a number of these sections does not have a mandatory construction. In other words, it means “may” or “can.”
marika
/ July 6, 2012Hello boys and girls. We are here today to do a little math. Ready? Lets do it.
Wisdom is needed here. Let the one with understanding solve the meaning of the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man. His number is 666.
What is the key word in this verse? Solve, or in another words “calculate”
6+6+6=18 which we will reduce to 1+8=9
6x6x6=216>2+1+6=9
666+666+666=1998>1+9++9+8=27>2+7=9
666x666x666=295408296>2+9+5+4+0+8+2+9+6=45>4+5=9
Now we know that devil is the opposite of God, so lets reverse 666 to 999
9+9+9=27>2+7=9
9x9x9x=729>7+2+9=18>1+8=9
999+999+999=2997>2+9+9+7=27>2+7=9
999x999x999=997002999=9+9+7+0+0+2+9+9+9=54>5+9=9
Lets deduct 997002999-295408296=701594703>7+0+1+5+9+4+7+0+3=36>3+6=9
Weeuf!
Did you notice something??? Yep, the end number was always 9.
Now watch what I will do with the result of multiplication of 666
295-40-8296 hmm that sure looks like SS#. it has 9 digits doesn’t it?
So does the multiplication of 999
997-00-2999
Question here is “Who’s SS# it is?” Obama has a couple doesn’t he? LOL
OK I am at the end of this riddle….any suggestions?
marika
/ July 6, 2012I hope you can read the entire calculation. For some reason my screen cut off the end on the long ones…but generally you’ll get an idea what I was doing here.
It hit me one day to read that Bible Revelation 13 verse 18. Oh hold on 1+8=9, isn’t that nice. The 666 is obvious to everyone, but reading that verse I was looking for the key word. I am not sure if what I did has any meaning, but certainly it makes for a good conversation topic
Let's Get Honest
/ August 20, 2012I will continue to link here and publicize this blog. Thank you for it. Marika should look up when chapters and verses were added to the Bible in its various translations; certainly not needed by Jesus in the original (scroll) when he stood up to read (Luke 4) to find Isaiah, or a place in it. The Bible contains complete sentences, thoughts, and its own structure, figures of speech to make its points: Repetition (polysyndeton, asyndeton see I Cor 13- look it up), and this image of the Beast rising from the sea (i.e., of peoples!) etc. If you’re working off NIV, most of them are lost or garbled for the sake of private interpretation. . . ~ ~ It may help better understanding the Bible if one spends some time APART from church services for a [very long] while (many prophets and Jesus had their wilderness time, plus 40-day fasts; think about it….) and, like Jesus etc. did, keep one’s eyes and ears open. Or, how about fasting (detoxing) from idiocy and seeing if the Book has as much to say about present-day 501(c)3s and/or religious exemption for churches on the basis of their public benefits provided(???) See DOFH.org and who is called “Father” (etc.) throughout it. EVERYTHING Jesus said about the institutions & leadership of his time applies today.Moreover, most of ‘em can’t even read straight — including key historical events in developing what we got today (like ca. 300 A.D.). . . . etc.
I speak from experience (and enough age) to say that my experience of the federally licensed institutions of a. Marriage, b. obtaining permit & license for the right to drive, and c. having (in ignorance) given our children birth certificates that this increased danger and poverty for them and me. (Just think about the costs of licensing if one cannot stay current; the costs of living if one doesn’t have credit; the costs of divorcing through the state — versus simply separating — for property and custody reasons. The “state” doesn’t care about much besides its own collections. This is primarily the message of my blog(s), i.e., Wake the Hell Up. Realitybloger, from what I can tell, is also right — just taking it up a notch, which I heartily approve of, and IF and WHEN I figure out a way to prosper apart from this system (working on it), I will also certainly publicize it. The Bible is right — the borrower (USA, Inc.) is servant to the lender. Abusive personalities know to go for the support system (economic control) FIRST, and try to get one to “give it up” by consent. We need some Gideons, and I believe the CAFR material just may be the pot that rattles it — as well as removing our consent to be licensed, permitted, extorted, and regulated by resigning as possible, our citizenship. I’d come to that conclusion long before reaching this material, but simply didn’t know how, or what else to do. Consider how Israel started the Exodus and under what conditions. Now consider what would’ve happened (and probably did) to the skeptics who stayed, and experienced up front, Egypt go down.
For Egypt in the interim, see Nonie Darwish, “Now they call me Infidel.” (She converted to Christianity, insider’s view….). Brown University, USA, couldn’t handle her….
Sincerely, “StandsWithAFist” and “HasLotsToSay.”
Onita
/ November 8, 2012I’m gone to inform my little brother, that he should also visit this web site on regular basis to get updated from most recent news update.
Nicklas Arthur
/ November 8, 2012terra0510
/ February 18, 2013Reblogged this on People's Trust Western PA and commented:
This is an excellent article written by Clint Richardson. Most of us have had the fear of the “mark of the beast” impressed upon us and I think it is so important to put those fears to rest. There is no anti-christ coming, he is already here, and he’s about as scary as Domino’s Pizza or Disneyland as corporations go. OPPT has put an end to it! You must step out of fear, step into your own power, and make a choice. Choose to no longer participate in their systems.
J. Lee
/ February 27, 2013HI Mr. Richardson, I heard on your new radio broadcast a comment about the personal income taxes being legal because the SSN was set up as a foreign entity that paid dividends. Can you direct me where I can get more information on this important subject?
Thanx,
J. Lee.
realitybloger
/ February 27, 2013Start here:
http://llstuler.wordpress.com/
But be sure to verifiy and let me know if you find anything false.
-Clint-
Savant19521
/ March 4, 2013what a lot of hysterical bunk. read your Bible and quit trying to scare people.
realitybloger
/ March 4, 2013What’s bunk, the bible quotes or the U.S. Code?
If you are going to leave a disparaging comment, at least place the semblance of a factoid to support your arrogant dismissal. Is that so much to ask?
marika
/ March 8, 2013Clint, I came across video and link to the website about a guy from USA who denounced his citizenship, burned his SS card and lives now in Bratislava Slovakia………I thought it may interest you, It got my attention. Comments at the bottom are worth while to read: http://www.nostate.com/1942/renouncing-privilege-and-fake-solidarity-595-12-5274/
realitybloger
/ March 10, 2013Thank you!
jacky
/ May 5, 2013According to Russian Orthodoxy:
Antichrist is 0% God and 100% man. He’s possessed by Satan since he’s 12 years old. He flies. He wears gloves to hide long nails. He’s pale with red eyes. He’s surrounded by demons who appear as angels of light. 666ed people go to permanent hell. 666 is given by lasers (isotope rays) on wrist or forehead when people stretch hands to receive small plastic grey card (world passport). Reject 666. http://www.goholycross.org/studies/councils.html Don’t go into a UFO to be healed by demons. Those who reject 666 will go to heaven. Also, their direct ancestors will be saved from hell. Dinosaurs live under our level. They will get out through sinkholes and lakes. To kill them, go for their nerves.