It’s Time To Join The Reality Movement


There’s a funny thing about the word “truth”…

Well, it’s not that funny for those of us who seek to live in “reality”.

You see, the word truth is subjective. One man’s truth may be another man’s fiction. And yet both can’t help but be bound within reality, for reality exists regardless of perceived truth. While reality does not change, truth can be declared to be completely opposite of reality, reinforced by media, popular culture, and even the law to overpower and cover up reality.

Let’s use a hypothetical example.

Let’s say that in reality, you just murdered a man on camera in front of 2 witnesses. In reality, this fact exists despite what one man believes is the truth (think O.J Simpson). For instance, your mother might never believe you are a murderer no mater what evidence is put before her. She could literally watch you commit the act on that camera footage and still hold tightly to her own personal truth – that her son or daughter could never commit murder.

Now let’s say you are standing in court accused of murder. But lets also say that you have either killed or silenced through bribery or threat and duress all witnesses, and have managed to magnetically erase all film footage from that surveillance tape (with mother’s help).

Has reality changed?

No. You killed that man. There were witnesses. The murder was indeed caught on tape. Nothing has changed in reality, for reality can never be changed.

Has the truth and the re-presentation of truth changed?

Absolutely. For the truth is ultimately going to be decided by the final opinion of the jury in that courtroom, whom did not witness reality. The jury is not considering reality, only truth; no matter how far from reality that truth is presented. The jury’s consideration of truth is only as good as the evidence introduced into that court, and yet reality is not ever one of the things presented, for reality took place long before that court proceeding. History of reality is but the best accepted truth of past reality. In fact, a court is literally the re-presentment of a simulated history of reality based on nothing but current truth. But if the truth is a lie or a misrepresentation of reality, as it almost always is, then we are faced with a daunting reality…

That there is no truth!

There is only reality.

In the end, since no evidence of reality was able to be presented in court, the jury is literally required to base their opinion upon the truth instead of reality. And ultimately,  in this case of your murdering another man, the truth is of course the opposite of reality. And the reality is that you just got away with murder based on a lack of representative proof of reality…

Or you could say that the truth has just indeed set you free!

In fact, this pretty much sounds like the reason government appears to operate legitimately. After all, government is a fictional entity that controls reality by manipulating the truth about its own reality. And of course government controls the courts that ultimately decide on the reality of truth. Thus, it could be said that the fictional, de facto (illegitimate) government acts in the realm of purposefully corrupted truth, and is thus immune from reality. This, in a word, can be defined as “sovereignty”. Government is only as real as the belief of the people in its truth.

But let’s really pin this down by taking a look at how these words are defined in the dictionary:

Truth (from Webster’s Dictionary of English Language, 1828)

1. Conformity to fact or reality; exact accordance with that which is, or has been, or shall be. The truth of history constitutes its whole value.
2. True state of facts or things. The duty of a court of justice is to discover the truth. Witnesses are sworn to declare the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.
3. Conformity of words to thoughts, which is called moral truth. Shall truth fail to keep her word?
4. Veracity; purity from falsehood; practice of speaking truth; habitual disposition to speak truth; as when we say, a man is a man of truth.
5. Correct opinion.
6. Fidelity; constancy.
7. Honesty; virtue.
8. Exactness; conformity to rule.
9. Real fact of just principle; real state of things. There are innumerable truths with which we are not acquainted.
10. Sincerity.
13. It is sometimes used by way of concession.

Wow! Truth is conformity to fact, words, or thoughts? What if the fact, words, or thoughts are not based in reality? After all, it was a true fact that the Earth was flat, and that sailors might foll off the edge into space. But this truth was not reality. Truth is a “correct opinion”? Really? What about the opinion of the court, which is always by law correct until altered (as if reality can be altered)? What about when the court’s opinion was that citizens should be subject to eugenic sterilization? Was that truth? And if truth is honesty, what do we call it when an honest man states a lie while believing it to be the honest truth? Many men have known the truth, only to find later that they were incorrect in their assumption. And yet reality never changed, because reality is not based on current, past, or future “truth”, but is in fact immune from the perception of truth.

It would be equally accurate to say God’s existence, whether real or not, is also completely immune from the many thousands of truths called religious beliefs and doctrine. God needs not man’s truth (belief) to exist in reality… or to not exist.

Half-Truth (From Black’s Law 2nd Edition)-

A deceitful act where only part of the truth is told where all of the truth will lead to a different conclusion.

So there can be a half-truth… and yet there is no such thing as a half-reality…

Reality, n. (From Webster’s Dictionary of English Language, 1828)

1. Actual being or existence of any thing; truth; fact; in distinction from mere appearance. A man may fancy he understands a critic, when in reality he does not comprehend his meaning.
2. Something intrinsically important, not merely matter of show. And to realities yield all her shows.
3. In the schools, that may exist of itself, or which has a full and absolute being of itself, and is not considered as a part of any thing else.
4. In law, immobility, or the fixed, permanent nature of property; as chattels which savor of the reality.

So while the truth can sometimes in happenstance mirror reality, the truth does not have a requirement to be true to or describe reality. Truth may be a belief that is not steeped in reality, and yet still be believed to be reality. And truth may be manufactured to appear to be reality, even though it is not… and that truth will be believed over reality. While truth needs not be created with intrinsic value, reality is the definition of something intrinsic. Reality cannot be un-intrinsic or false, while the illusion of truth may certainly prevail over intrinsic reality. And while reality has only one disposition, which is reality itself, the truth may have multiple dispositions – some of which even contradict each other.

So, in reality, the truth really only has one post-requisite requirement to be accepted as reality… belief by others. And preferably in politics, this is a belief by the majority of the masses.

Isn’t it time to retire the “Truth Movement” for a better and more realistic alternative? After all, how many truths are there about 9/11?

Isn’t it time to comprehend that “truth” will never be officially recognized as reality?

Isn’t it time to stop letting the reality of crimes and criminals be masked by the false-truth that government courts spew out to protect those crimes and criminals?

Isn’t it time to become the “Reality Movement”?

For truth is the Matrix!!!

.

–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Wednesday, January 22nd, 2014

About these ads
Leave a comment

6 Comments

  1. Hi Clint,
    My name is Mladen and I am the guy behind the camera for Christian man Daniel and our ChristianRemedyInLaw channel on YouTube. You are on the right track with respect to trying to show people that they are living in a world based on their own false beliefs, which misrepresents the facts in law.

    Daniel is looking forward to hearing from you and sharing our discoveries about the facts in law, which we have garnered from many years of independent research and due diligence. Our research is primarily based on the Authorized 1611 King James Holy Bible, and we also refer to many English dictionaries for the law of language for the true meaning of individual words, as well as perspectives from the secular (God-less, non-spiritual) laws of man. The truth and facts in law are not hidden and we look forward to helping you and your readers and listeners gain a detailed knowledge of who you are and what you are not.

    More importantly, we look forward to sharing the one-and-only remedy that gives every individual the choice to elect to serve either God or mammon (money), but not both. For those individuals that want to use their consent, free will choice and their right to self-determination to serve God we look forward to sharing knowledge, wisdom and understanding with respect to how one would go about giving proper honourable good faith notice to the secular governments to convey their intent to be separate so that they can serve God under the Christian constitutional exemption, — not to be confused with a constitutional objection. Take care and may God bless all. We look forward to speaking with you soon.

    For any individuals that are interested, all of our information is shared freely on our YouTube channel, which is ChristianRemedyInLaw.
    —- Mladen
    —— child52of144@hotmail.com

    Reply
  2. aether

     /  March 9, 2014

    What is legal is of “form”, what is lawful is of “substance”. (Blacks Law 1st Edition)

    Form. The antithesis of substance; the appearance or superficial aspect rather than the substance or the essence. (Ballentine’s Legal Dictionary 3rd Edition)

    The kingdom of Man, the World of Appearances
    Man cannot rule according to the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth because he does not know the whole truth. Judge and Jury can only rule according to appearances – because that is all they know. In legalese, what is “of form” exists within the dimension of man’s mind as an appearance rather than truth. So something “of form” is about mental imagery – the appearance to the mind. If you provide information, you are providing a mental projection to others, you are providing them a representation of your “perceived” truth, a mental image. The truth “in the now” has passed. If you are an informant, you are one who claims to understand and you aim to instill that understanding into another’s mind. A physical piece of paper to relay information (to the minds eye) is called a form. This physical paper form enables the reader to create a mental image or understanding once the information is added. That mental image or understanding is “of form”, which means by definition “of appearance, evident to the mind”. Deception cannot work without appearance. Appearance is the primary tool of deception and a deceiver. The deceiver will paint a picture upon your mind with information. Or perhaps his words will create mental images that will conform you. Perhaps he will deceive church leaders to reform their church. If you accept a paper form from another, and consent, you have a meeting of the minds – a formal contract. A good performance will instill images upon your mind for a time.

    Ten people may have 10 different perceptions. 10 different perceptions of reality/truth. Just trust the “legal system”, they will “form” their own perception of reality and “rule” on it ! All according to appearances.

    John 14:6 – Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.

    Confusion comes from appearances (mental forms/images), in the twisted world of the human and the legal realm. There is one truth and one reality … in my humble opinion of course. The carnal man is stuck in appearances, the spiritual man seeks and finds truth.

    aether
    aetherical.blogspot.ca

    Reply
  3. Hey People and Clint, This is Russ Jensen in Salt Lake City Utah with a short audio briefly discussing How to use the Federal Constitution Article 1 Sec 8 Clause 10 Law of Nations+Title 18 USC 242+Civil Rico to bring legal actions against those in Public Office,WHILE THEY ARE STILL IN OFFICE

    Reply
  4. Your Obligations Create Your Rights The Constitution Only Protects Those Rights

    Russ Jensen

    Reply
  1. Seeking “Truth” or Reality ? | Sovereign Independent UK

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,286 other followers

%d bloggers like this: