It’s Time To Withdraw Your Membership To The United States!


Citizenship SchoolIf you are a member of an organization that begins to do things you don’t like, the rational course of action would be to withdraw your financial support to that organization and cease to be a member.

If your bank misbehaves or charges you ridiculous extra fees just because it can according to your “agreement” with the bank, the rational course of action would be to withdraw your financial support and cease to be a customer.

If your insurance coverage starts to diminish in quality or denies you your due benefits or coverage when you need it, the rational course of action would be to withdraw your financial support to that company and cease to be a member.

If my doctor or hospital began to practice bad medicine and cause more illness than it cured, the rational course of action would be to withdraw financial support to that hospital or doctor and cease to be a customer, and perhaps pursue alternative healing.

In fact, when we consider this repetitive logic, wouldn’t anyone be hard-pressed to think of any thing that might mistreat us as a member or customer that would not warrant the withdraw of financial support and termination of contract or membership?

So why then are people still voluntary members of the United States central government?

Do they enjoy the thought of future bad healthcare – which is really the quite unlawful forced commerce with insurance companies and not actual healthcare? If their membership to a corporation that gives them “benefits” suddenly forces them to accept bad medicine and bad insurance, isn’t the simple solution to end their membership to the main corporation?

Do the people enjoy paying taxes and unjust extortion fees and taxes for non-crimes just so that government can invest that money for itself without offering any benefit back to the people? Would it not be prudent to end that kind of business “relationship” with such a bad business?

Do people really believe that the meager benefit of “old-age insurance” called social security (socialism) is worth the vast amount of legal restrictions and tyrannies set forth upon them through their entire life – even when they could have invested their own money and walked away with double or triple what this administration will ever pay them – should they actually live through Obama-care? Do the people even know that there is no actual trust in their name – just a large investment fund that has been completely tapped for the national debt with no legal requirement to ever pay them anything? Do they know the difference between investing for themselves and their future and contributing (giving away) their hard-earned money to government? Do they realize where their money goes as government invests it into war, Monsanto, pharmaceuticals, and Think tanks?

Is there some misconception that being a “citizen” is somehow patriotic – that withdrawing their citizenship (membership) will make them less “American”?

Really? Because last time I checked, it was called the United States of America, not America of the United States.

Was there created at some point in history the fallacy that America is the central government called the United States – a 10 mile square municipal corporation that is not even one of the actual 50 states in the “union” ? Do the people actually believe that America is the United States?

Perhaps that misconception derives from the misunderstanding of just what citizenship is.

For citizenship is simply a membership, be it voluntary or forced through coercion and martial law, unilaterally agreed to by an individual. It is no different than a gym membership; where you must follow the rules set out in your agreement contract that only you sign. Like the government, the gym does not sign your contract. It is simply an agreement for membership to enjoy some benefits, as well as an agreement for you to follow their rules.

But what happens when the rules change without your consent?

What happens when the benefits diminish?

For instance, each state is a member of the Untied States, forced to hand over their unappropriated lands to the United States and draft new State constitutions after the Civil War under “reconstruction” and after agreeing to the terms of uniform “enabling acts” under duress. In fact, the civil war was nothing but a military takeover by a defunct central government under martial law of the lawfully succeeded sovereign states. They were forced back into contract membership with the new central government, one that was unlawfully created absent of the lawful participation of these states’ lawful congressmen. In their stead, military martial officers of law were forced into congress to replace the lawfully elected congressmen of each state. And under duress and at gunpoint, these states became members of this municipal corporation in Washington D.C, eventually dividing the entire territory of America into counties within states.

COUNTY. A district into which a state is divided.

2. The United States are generally divided into counties; counties are divided into townships or towns…

4. In some states, as Illinois; 1 Breese, R. 115; a county is considered as a corporation, in others it is only a quasi corporation.

5. In the English law this word signifies the same as shire, county being derived from the French and shire from the Saxon. Both these words signify a circuit or portion of the realm, into which the whole land is divided, for the better government thereof, and the more easy administration of justice. There is no part of England that is not within some county, and the shire-reve, (sheriff) originally a yearly officer, was the governor of the county. Four of the counties of England, viz. Lancaster, Chester, Durham and Ely, were called counties Palatine, which were jurisdictions of a peculiar nature, and held by, especial charter from the king. See stat. 27 H. VIII. c.25.

COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. Certain officers generally entrusted with the superintendence of the collection of the county taxes, and the disbursements made for the county. They are administrative officers, invested by the local laws with various powers.

***All legal definitions taken from Bouvier’s Law Dictioanry, 1856

Counties are nothing but municipal corporations; a network grid of contract issuers and enforcers for the United States government – acting under administrate local law with federal powers. Another word for administrative is contract. And all administrative law is simply the administration of the unilateral contractual relationship with you and government. The county has police officers. The gym has security guards. There is no difference. Police officers are just security guards for the county corporation. They’re authority is presumed, just as your citizenship that might grant them contractual authority over you is presumed.

UNILATERAL CONTRACT, civil law. When the party to whom an engagement is made, makes no express agreement on his part, the contract is called uni-lateral, even in cases where the law attaches certain obligations to his acceptance… A loan of money, and a loan for use, are of this kind.

One does not generally think of government as just another customer-based corporation, but this is exactly what it is. When signing a unilateral agreement (contract), one agrees to follow a certain set of de facto corporate rules and regulations (codes) as set out by government. This is the voluntary state of citizenship – a series of unilateral contractual agreements signed or unsigned (presumption of law) by the people of America.

This circumstance of multiple contractual obligations is often called the STRAWMAN, which is simply the “person” as defined and bound by these contracts. The “person” is artificial, as defined in US Code and the 14th Amendment (see below). The person is a corporate veil of the man, used for the purposes of contracts. And in administrative law, government can only contract with this artificial person. Government cannot regulate man, only the corporate person. Thus, administrative law has nothing to do with and no authority over living man, unless he or she is acting under the commercial activities described within their contractual relationship with government.

A driver’s license, for instance, is a unilateral contractual agreement by one man to follow the State government’s vehicle code, which is administrative law. Driving is administratively speaking a commercial activity. Thus, driving can be regulated by government… but only if the man agrees to become a commercial person while utilizing his automobile. He does this when he unilaterally agrees for no reason at all to agree with government that he is utilizing his car as a commercial “vehicle”, even when dropping the kids off at school. Even if that car is never used for any purpose in commerce pr commercial activities, the government still elicits people to obtain a commercial license to drive.

You see, this is the only way that government can have authority over you. It must trick you into entering into some agreement and contract for which you give your consent to its authority. Without this unilateral agreement, government cannot rule you and regulate every part of your life. It must convince you that the activities you participate in are within its authority as a legal activity before it can tell you they are illegal. And it must lie to you so as to convince you that using your car to travel is illegal unless you have a license to do so. For a license is nothing more than permission from government to do something illegal. In other words, every time you get into your vehicle and drive you are breaking the law by permission.

Though traveling in your personal automobile is not unlawful, driving commercially without a license is illegal – a breach of contract.

Perhaps most ironic about all of this is the simple realization that all of this contractual relationship nonsense is based on one and only one thing – your membership with the United States corporation in Washington D.C. This is the central hub of information. It is where your official artificial person is stored and maintains residence. And states and counties are just subdivisions of that corporation – artificial borders signifying United States jurisdiction, assigned federal locator codes called ZIP codes that are property of the United States. For the U.S. Postal Service is part of the United States corporation in Washington D.C. Your United States mail is not delivered to your home, it is delivered to your commercial address within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.

You must never forget that all of your commercial activities are being done inside of the United States jurisdiction – the artificial corporate veil that extends throughout the 50 states and beyond like a spider web, ensnaring the activities people like flies and spinning them into commercial persons.

Imagine in your mind that the entire land of America has a plastic coating over it for which all people walk upon as corporate persons and citizens of the United States, never really comprehending that this clear plastic coating of corporate person-hood separates their natural body from the natural land. The people walk and talk on this corporate veil of clear plastic as if it doesn’t exist and as if they are walking on the actual land – which ironically is a true statement. For corporatism is indeed artificial, just as the artificial person replaces the man in his or her transactions with the corporation government, so to does the United States replace the land of America with its veil of artificial person-hood called statutes and codes.

Yet just on the other side of this artificial construct lies the natural world, natural law, and all of the natural rights that existed before the people contractually agreed to give them up for government granted political rights. For tyranny and oppression is literally the contractual right of citizens of the United States.

For a deeper understanding of what a right actually is (and this reality will certainly surprise you), please take the time to study my expose’ here:

Link–> http://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2013/02/19/tyranny-requires-equality/

Perhaps this love affair with citizenship stems from the fallacious belief that the United States is still the same old sovereign county it was when it was founded, before the civil war tore it apart and the defunct and unlawful United States glued it back together with legal tape and military oppression?

Well, I’ve got some bad news for you folks…

The United States is now a member of the United Nations… and the United States is referred to as a “sovereign state” by that international central government. Just like the states under contractual membership with the United States corporation in Washington D.C. are not referred to as “countries”, the 193 countries of the world under membership of the United Nations corporation are also not called “countries”. And it is not the people or the 50 states that are members of the United Nations, it is just this 10 mile square piece of land called the United States corporation that is a member.

So can a sovereign individual state be a member of such a central government and still be sovereign? And can a sovereign nation then still be sovereign as a member of an international government under international maritime and admiralty (military) law?

The United Nations doctrine for “statehood” rings familiar, sounding very much like the false paradigm of the rules of “statehood” for the 50 states in the United States of America:

The dominant customary international law standard of statehood is the declarative theory of statehood that defines the state as a person of international law if it “possess the following qualifications: (a) a permanent population; (b) a defined territory; (c) government; and (d) capacity to enter into relations with the other states.” Debate exists on the degree to which recognition should be included as a criterion of statehood. The declarative theory of statehood, an example of which can be found in the Montevideo Convention, argues that statehood is purely objective and recognition of a state by other states is irrelevant. On the other end of the spectrum, the constitutive theory of statehood defines a state as a person under international law only if it is recognized as sovereign by other states. For the purposes of this list, included are all states that either:

  • (a) have declared independence and are often regarded as having control over a permanently populated territory

or

  • (b) are recognised as a sovereign state by at least one other sovereign state

Link–> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sovereign_states

The word-magic here involves the concept that the “state” has “declared independence” and has “control over a permanently populated area”.

This is of course the United States. It, as a central incorporated government, has declared independence that no one dare challenge due to its military might. The once sovereign states now pledged as collateral for this corporation, its debts, and its “good faith and credit” are considered nothing but legal territories of the United States in the legal realm through this contractual and constitutional relationship. The governments of the individual state territories of the United States are still military in nature, each one occupied by the United States’ military and its bases, which under the Libor Code represents military rule.

In other words, the presence of a military base in your State is stated in law to signify military rule under martial law. These bases are not just for your protection, they are for your control. They are the occupying forces of the United States, left over from the same forces that occupied each State during the Civil War. They are the United States corporation’s military – the military of Washington D.C. –  not the American or state militia. They protect the United States from all threats both foreign and domestic, and that includes the people of America and the 50 states. The military ensures the continuity of this 10 mile square municipal corporation and its military rule over the 50 states and other insular possessions. The United States is legally in possession of us!

And each state is governed militarily by a “governor”, whom in Canada is referred to as “Governor General”, and who is the ex officio Commander-in-Chief of the State National Guard of His State unless called in total by the President as (CIC) of the United States. This military position of Governor as commander of a military force is followed by a whole list of military positions…

Lieutenant Governor
Attorney General
Solicitor General
Insurance Commissioner – i.e. military commissions
Superintendents – The commanding officer of the United States Military Academy is its Superintendent.
State Controller
Officers of the court
Police Officers
Employees of Commissions and Authorities

All of these titles represent rule by military force.

OFFICER. He who is lawfully invested with an office.

2. Officers may be classed into, 1. Executive; as the president of the United States of America, the several governors of the different states. Their duties are pointed out in the national constitution, and the constitutions of the several states, but they are required mainly to cause the laws to be executed and obeyed.

3. – 2. The legislative; such as members of congress; and of the several state legislatures. These officers are confined in their duties by the constitution, generally to make laws, though sometimes in cases of impeachment, one of the houses of the legislature exercises judicial functions, somewhat similar to those of a grand jury by presenting to the other articles of impeachment; and the other house acts as a court in trying such impeachments. The legislatures have, besides the power to inquire into the conduct of their members, judge of their elections, and the like.

OFFICE. An office is a right to exercise a public function or employment, and to take the fees and emoluments belonging to it

2. Offices may be classed into civil and military.

TAKE. This is a technical expression which signifies to be entitled to; as, a devisee will take under the will. To take also signifies to seize, as to take and carry away…

CIVIL. This word has various significations. 1. It is used in contradistinction to barbarous or savage, to indicate a state of society reduced to order and regular government; thus we speak of civil life, civil society, civil government, and civil liberty.

2. It is sometimes used in contradistinction to criminal, to indicate the private rights and remedies of men, as members of the community, in contrast to those which are public and relate to the government; thus we speak of civil process and criminal process, civil jurisdiction and criminal jurisdiction.

3. It is also used in contradistinction to military or ecclesiastical, to natural or foreign; thus we speak of a civil station, as opposed to a military or ecclesiastical station; a civil death as opposed to a natural death; a civil war as opposed to a foreign war.

So what does all this mean?

Consider for a moment just what the term “civil war” actually represents. As with the United States Civil War, we find that it was indeed fought to ensure the forced continuity of the United States government. It was not so much a war as it was an invasion. And it was fought to ensure that the people under martial law went along with that government who did not wish to.

To make the contradistinction between the words military and civil is almost a mute point. For a “civil society” under “civil law” cannot be accomplished without force of a military entity – which is the executive branch of government (now the Department Of Defense – as in defense of the realm).

For instance, the U.S. District Courts operate with no authority to actually enforce their decisions. Thus the power of the courts lie in the connection it has to the Executive Branch of that area. This is the true importance of the County Sheriff, for the Sheriff is the Executive power of all the courts within that county. The Sheriff’s Department man’s these courts (bailiffs, etc.), who operate under his authority. Of course, the Sheriff would have little power without the decisions and warrants issued by the courts. In a lawful society this would be referred to as a check and balance, creating a restraint of unreasonable power or influence by either entity. But when unlawful men occupy these offices as persons of the militarized United States under its authority and jurisdiction, the law becomes lawless and the powers of corruption go unchecked.

In essence, this relationship between the judicial and the executive is symbiotic in nature, where alone each office and officer would have no lawful power. But together they become the law, both written and enforced. The cowardly attorney’s in black robes called judges hide behind their pulpits and gavels while the Sheriff hides behind his badge and gun, while each gives authority to the other. Neither takes responsibility for their own actions, because they have been allowed to operate as artificial persons under limited liability incorporation. And they protect each other from legal action as one derives power unjustly from the other.

If lawful men took over either office, refusing to enforce the power and authority of the other, and taking responsibility for their own actions outside of the color of law, the people would have little to fear from their government. But lawful men such as these generally end up dead or imprisoned by the very entity they represent.

On the national level, the President of the United States acts as the Commander In Chief of his executive army, carrying out the legislative and judicial law presented to it. Congress, like the judicial, has no power to enforce its created statutes and codes (judicial opinions for courts) without the enforcement arm of the Executive Branch. A law or decision without force carries no weight, especially from men with no honor.

In other words, the legal system of the United States is solely based on the force and coercion of the executive government to carry out the political laws created by congress. The local and state governments operate under the authority of the United States, for they are just corporations as extensions of that federal government corporation.

Congress created the court system and the Supreme Court, which derives its authority and jurisdiction from that body politic.This is an important fact because this means that the entire system of corporate administrative courts across the country are statutory in nature – created by congress and not the constitution itself, and operating under the authority and jurisdiction of the United States corporation. To put it simply, this means that the courts are operating under private corporate law without lawful authority. That is, unless you consent to that authority as a private corporate person – a member of the United States corporation. Just like the gym example, this private law only applies to members of the United States.

This creation of the court system was done by Congress in the Judiciary Act of 1789:

–=–

The Judiciary Act of 1789

September 24, 1789.

1 Stat. 73.

CHAP. XX. – An Act to establish the Judicial Courts of the United States.

SECTION 1. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the supreme court of the United States shall consist of a chief justice and five associate justices, any four of whom shall be a quorum, and shall hold annually at the seat of government two sessions, the one commencing the first Monday of February, and the other the first Monday of August. That the associate justices shall have precedence according to the date of their commissions, or when the commissions of two or more of them bear date on the same day, according to their respective ages…

Link–> http://www.constitution.org/uslaw/judiciary_1789.htm

–=–

The authority and jurisdiction of these statutory courts only applies to citizens (members) of the United States.

Some people also refer to citizens as “employees” of the Untied States, which is not incorrect. Congressmen (representatives and senators) are also “employees” of the United States corporation, but are officially called “Members”. And we can read above that judges and justices are “commissioned” as employees.

All of these men are acting as artificial persons of the United States, for there is no natural law or natural rights under civil and administrative law because only political law exists there – abeyance by force of contract. This is the very definition of military rule. And every time a citizen does not obey the law, the militarized executive branch steps in to force either compliance, incarceration, or death.

Murder is unlawful and illegal, but government gives license to commit this illegal act – a license to kill. It is interesting to note that government only acknowledges the “civil death” of a person, not the bloody and violent taking of the life of a man.

CIVIL DEATH, persons. The change of the state of a person who is declared civilly dead by judgment of a competent tribunal. In such case, the person against whom such sentence is pronounced is considered dead.

It is interesting to note here that just as a living or natural man cannot have a civil death but only a natural one, the word “perish” does not apply to persons, as artificial persons never existed as a living things but only as contractual things in legal code:

TO PERISH. To come to an end; to cease to be; to die.

2. What has never existed cannot be said to have perished

You see, an artificial person (corporation) never actually exists in nature, so it cannot have a natural death.

So it is perhaps the best definition of civil law for me to say that:

Civil law is the state of non-necessity of martial law while under military rule, because the governed are not acting in civil disobedience.

Martial law is the physical manifestation of force and violence via government decree to ensure the continuity of military rule that is visible and obvious (violent) to all people.

And military rule is simply the current state of a system of de facto United States corporate law based on coercion, force, and occasional violence, which is sugar-coated and masked under the appearance of civility and under the guise of “civil law”.

Civil law and military rule, therefore, are all but indistinguishable. They are both systems of law enacted by forced compliance of the Executive Branch of government. In both systems, the laws they tout are ensured by force. And in both instances, a man’s natural rights are struck down in lieu of positive or political rights.

It is ironic and disturbing then to point out the now obvious paradox of a subjected people in an occupied land…

For it would only be through open revolt and total disobedience of the current laws of the United States central government that the above facts could manifest themselves as self evident. This axiom of military rule is invisible to the civil servants and citizens of government, no differently than the subjects of a king might never consider that they are at all times under military rule – the rule by force of a tyrant – no matter how fair or just that king seems to be.

This kingdom called the United States – the District that reigns the lands of America through contractual membership under force of its own law despite being a foreign corporate entity outside of those lands – holds the reigns to millions of soldiers; obedient Americans conscripted by their own enemy through contract as security guards for the United States. And these soldiers, in their belief that they are fighting for America, will no doubt blindly follow this United States corporation into oblivion no differently than did those useful fools that killed father, brother, and child in that great United States Civil War – “The War Of Northern Aggression“.

Perhaps a more fitting title to that Civil War and to all wars proceeding it would read: “The Unending War Of Continued United States Aggression, Both Foreign and Domestic“.

Now you might think that Congress is there to redress grievances of the people to the United States government as representatives thereof. But oh what a tangled web they weave…

Congressmen are “employees” of the United States government, according to TITLE 5 of U.S. CODE.

So this would be like expecting a mid-level management employee of Walmart to change the policies of Walmart’s CEO and board of directors. Employees have no individual say on what happens in the United States corporation. So a single representative is worthless without the agreement of the vast majority of the entire body of representatives.

And of course the people represented in these congressional districts never seem to realize that the business affairs of Congress only happen inside of Washington D.C. – in other words outside of their State. Just as employees of Walmart have no authority outside of the corporate jurisdiction of Walmart, neither do the congressmen and Senators have power in the 50 individual States as republics. They are the Representatives of the Federal Government to the people, not the representatives of the people to the Federal Government. They conduct only Federal business in the jurisdiction of the United States, even while doing so in the States they hold domicile. They are United States Employees, not State Employees. In fact, they have absolutely no power within the State government, except those imposed by force by the Federal Central government as a whole.

So why do the people contractually volunteer to give up their power to a bunch of known-to-be-corrupt representatives as employees of the very entity that enslaves them, instead of leaving this horrific militarized club called the United States by withdrawing legal membership?

Perhaps it is the misconception that our membership (citizenship) is not a choice.

But wait a minute, you say. Isn’t it my “constitutional right” to be a citizen?

That’s an interesting question, actually. In fact, the concept of “citizenship” as it stands today was not part of the original constitution. Citizenship was created after the “country” was placed under military rule (martial law) under the Libor Code and General Orders 100. It was in this reconstruction period after the “Civil War” that was created reconstruction amendment #14.

The 14th Amendment states:

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside…”

Whereas before this amendment was ratified by the now unlawful military congress the concept of citizenship was based on the blood of the man in question in a natural sense, the United States now took on a corporate disposition and changed the presumption of citizenship into a legally binding contractual duty; where all people became artificial persons as individual corporate bodies politic within the United States’ web of corporatism.

The most overlooked word in this amendment to the constitution is the word “subject”:

SUBJECT, contracts. The thing which is the object of an agreement. This term is used in the laws of Scotland.

SUBJECT, persons, government. An individual member of a nation, who is subject to the laws; this term is used in contradistinction to citizen, which is applied to the same individual when considering his political rights.

2. In monarchical governments, by subject is meant one who owes permanent allegiance to the monarch. Vide Body politic

NATIONALITY. The state of a person in relation to the nation in which he was born.

2. A man retains his nationality of origin during his minority, but, as in the case of his domicil of origin, he may change his nationality upon attaining full age; he cannot, however, renounce his allegiance without permission of the government. See Citizen; Domicile; Expatriation; Naturalization…

NATIONS. Nations or states are independent bodies politic; societies of men united together for the purpose of promoting their mutual safety and advantage by the joint efforts of their combined strength.

2. But every combination of men who govern themselves, independently of all others, will not be considered a nation; a body of pirates, for example, who govern themselves, are not a nation. To constitute a nation another ingredient is required. The body thus formed must respect other nations in general, and each of their members in particular. Such a society has her affairs and her interests; she deliberates and takes resolutions in common; thus becoming a moral person who possesses an understanding and will peculiar to herself, and is susceptible of obligations and rights…

3. It belongs to the government to declare whether they will consider a colony which has thrown off the yoke of the mother country as an independent state; and until the government have decided on the question, courts of justice are bound to consider the ancient state of things as remaining unchanged.

In the Civil War, it would be a foregone conclusion to state that the United States did not accept (as it was lawfully required to do via its own charter) the secession of the confederate states – the yolks that threw themselves from the mother country. Instead, it acted unlawfully by all standards of ethics and natural law – a military conquest being the result – forcing the confederate states to be captured as prisoners of war and to accept the new reorganized United States and its new corporate constitution as their new sovereign tyrant.

COUNTRY. By country is meant the state of which one is a member.

2. Every man’s country is in general the state in which he happens to have been born, though there are some exceptions. See Domicil; Inhabitant. But a man has the natural right to expatriate himself, i. e. to abandon his country, or his right of citizenship acquired by means of naturalization in any country in which he may have taken up his residence. See Allegiance; Citizen; Expatriation…

Remember, the United Nations refers to the United States as a state that is a member of the U.N, just as the United States refers to its own 50 States that are supposedly independent but members of that body.

But more importantly one must understand the distinction made here of being “born in the country of the United States”.

Though a man may be born in the State of Georgia, his residence is created within the jurisdiction of the United States – that incorporated legal boundry that extends across the entirety of the territories called “states” and beyond. In essence, when a man is born in the United States, it is his artificial person that is civilly born, creating a citizen.

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside…”

Again, this very important distinction must be made…

Though you physically are born in and reside within a State, the artificial representation of you called a legal “person” and a “citizen” is civilly born in and resides within the jurisdiction of the United States. Registered persons/citizens who vote are actually voting in the artificial representation of Washington D.C. – the jurisdiction that extends from that central district 10 miles square over the entire “country” through contract. Your home is a registered United States home. Your vehicle is a registered United States vehicle. Your children are registered United States persons. And all of these contractual agreements can be utilized to take these things away from citizens. In fact, it is the political and constitutional right of all citizens to have their registered property of the United States taken away from them. Just read the 5th Amendment very carefully… for it tells you clearly that through the United States court system under what it calls “due process”, you life, liberty, and property can be taken from you (see definition of take above).

In this way, it is correct to say that for the most part, the actual individual states are empty – abandoned by all the people who became residents of the United States in Washington D.C. – for the people all reside in the United States, and the States are territories of the United States. The people walk as persons upon the plastic coating of United States jurisdiction, never touching the natural land. Of course the illusion of States rights still exists among the citizens of the United States, who have no idea they are under the military rule of this foreign corporation, and who do not comprehend the true nature of the word person or citizen.

In the United States corporation…

Citizenship is granted, not taken;

Citizenship is legal and political, not lawful and natural;

Citizenship is contractual, not moral;

Citizenship is a voluntary membership, not a mandatory requirement.

Citizenship is artificial and un-American!!!

Perhaps the natural born citizens of the United States should be asking themselves why this so-called privilege and natural right of citizenship is being tossed to the wind and bestowed to those who did not naturally and traditionally gain it? The fact that citizenship can be contractually bestowed upon anyone who is contractually willing to receive or pay for all of the benefits and tyranny that accompanies such a legal status should be enough for anyone to realize that its conveyance has nothing to do with anything but a contractual tie to the military rule of government. This once honorable title of men is now just a corporate slogan to sell monopolized, for-profit government products and services to ignorant persons at non-competative prices.

Take the influx of what we call “illegal immigrants” as a clue as to how America became a militarized corporate slave machine:

The Pew Hispanic Center determined that according to an analysis of Census Bureau data about 8 percent of children born in the United States in 2008 — about 340,000 — were offspring of unauthorized immigrants. In total, about four million American-born children of unauthorized immigrant parents resided in this country in 2009, along with about 1.1 million foreign-born children of unauthorized immigrant parents. The Center for Immigration Studies – a think tank which favors stricter controls on immigration—claims that between 300,000 and 400,000 children are born each year to illegal immigrants in the U.S.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sovereign_states

These are “natural born” children (citizens) just like you according to your representatives in government, for citizens are no longer required to have honor to join the “country”. And soon over 11 million non-natural born invading immigrants will join the party when the United States says it’s just alright.

Citizenship means nothing to an honorable man. It is just a ticket to ride on the slave-ship. It is the act of selling ones soul to acquire artificial things. And it has become a pour substitute for a once-cherished thing. Most importantly, it does not make you an American, just a useful pawn in a collective extortion racket designed to create corporate authority by making all the people into one collective tool to extract their individual power and intent as one lone consenting voice for the actions of an unlawful corporation. And every unlawful action by government is based on the informed consent it presumes from its members.

Isn’t it time to rebut that presumption of consent and take back our individual voices and power as individual men?

So let’s say that you are a member of an exclusive golf club that only allows people just like you to enter. You retain a membership to this club because you wish to be a part of something special and be around like-minded individuals who contribute and benefit from this club and its rules and regulations, as well as its exclusivity and respect. And you stay a member because this club operates legitimately and lawfully with full respect to nature and to all involved.

But then let’s say that your club is taken over and its rules for membership changed.

Suddenly, this club is full of men, women and children (persons) who are not like-minded in any way and who do not respect in any way your methods, opinions, lifestyle, morals, ethics, values, and so on. And then the club management passes rules and regulations that require you to integrate, hire as employees, and tolerate all of these new members – lest you be fined and imprisoned for discrimination and your corporation terminated and its assets seized by government. (Note: This is what E-Verify does.)

Would not the proper response be to immediately end your membership with that club and either find a more lawful club or start your own exclusive one?

The club only seeks to collect more and more revenue and fees from these new members, in order to both generate more revenue and to control more and more of the population by forcing its registration of all things and children. So why would anyone stay as a member of that club only to be forced to tolerate a cultural invasion and complete change in the standards of that club? Why would you continue to financially support that club’s central governing body when everything it does goes against your ideals and values?

So why do you continue to stay a member of the United States club?

It’s not a requirement! It’s not necessary for you to work and live in America and in a State. This beast’s Social Security number is not needed for anything at all. And it certainly isn’t helping you to stay a member, unless you consider tyranny, unjust taxation without representation, pain, punishment, and extortion your political right like government does.

We complain, we scream, we weep, and we suffer. And all because we believe that we must stay members of this corporation that continuously harms us. We accept the mark and the number of this beast because we believe it is for the greater good. We support its illegal wars and pay for them with our voluntary taxes. It doesn’t listen or care about us as anything but commodities, because a corporation only cares about growth (expansion) and profits. It sells our labor and bonds our incarceration. It takes all and gives nothing.

So why are you still a citizen of this 10 mile square corporation that seeks to control every aspect of your life through your voluntary contractual obligation? Isn’t it time to pull the plug and stop financially supporting its exaction tactics to extort your money and estate?

Isn’t it time to take back your registered United States property and place it back into your personal possession, including your children?

Or are a few non-guaranteed benefits at the expense of future generations (your children and theirs) more important than being free?

Do you really think it would be un-American to withdraw your membership to this corporation that isn’t even part of America?

Since the concept of being an American seems to have been blurred between the natural and the contractual, perhaps we should end here with a quote from the most American thing I can think of…

“When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.

That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security…”

–Declaration of Independence

.

–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Saturday, May 18th, 2013

 

All legal definitions taken from Bouvier’s Law Dictioanry, 1856:

A World Without Gray – Episode 3 – For Land And Country


Episode 3, for your listening enjoyment. This is my interview with Vicky Davis, writer and researcher of ChannelingReality.com

I highly recommend that you read the following information (below) before or after listening to this interview, for I believe it is one of my most important research projects yet in uncovering the true nature of the United States. Also, please watch the two videos at the end, for a glimpse of the future of mankind and America…

Download here: http://realitybloger.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/awwg_e3_02072013.mp3

–=–

For Land And Country

–=–

What does it mean to you when someone says “fight for your country”?

For some, the concept of just what a “country” is becomes blurred between two completely different things. While the conversational term for country usually defines the living people, the physical land, and the fictional government together in one neat package, the fact is that these things are quite different from one another, and are only connected through ink and consent of those living people as a “body politic”.

The “land” – the real and tangible thing we call home – is indeed not legally the “country”. Living men are also not legally the country.

The country is in fact a reamed folder of legal papers, notarized and signed by the appropriate members of a corporate “federation” called the United States. It’s borders are demarcated within this paperwork, but these too are not part of the actual physical land. It sets its own rules, changes those rules with the signing of a pen, and does so without the will of the people.

The land and the living people who inhabit it are called a country – a body politic – but only in a legal sense. The people, in order to inhabit this artificial country legally as “residents”, must also become artificial. They must become persons through contract so as to be part of (citizens) of this legal “country”.

“A “federation” is by definition an unincorporated entity, but a “federated” entity is corporated. A “union” of states is not a corporate entity, but that the “United” States is a corporation.”

Confused? You are supposed to be.

Instead of taking my word for it, I wonder what the government, the courts, and the Supreme Court thinks?

“Persons dealing with the government are charged with knowing government statutes and regulations, and they assume the risk that government agents may exceed their authority and provide misinformation,” –Lavin v. Marsh, 644 F.2d 1378 (9th Cir. 1981), 644 F.2d, at 1383.

“Whatever the form in which the government functions, anyone entering into an arrangement with the government takes a risk of having accurately ascertained that he who purports to act for the government stays within the bounds of his authority, even though the agent himself may be unaware of the limitations upon his authority.” –Federal Crop Insurance v. Merrill, Supreme Court, 332 U.S. 380

From the West LegalEdcenter’s Securities Litigation Report:

Link: http://corporate.findlaw.com/finance/cftc-sees-dodd-frank-reforms-essential-to-reduce-future-risk.html

“International Coordination”

Twenty-first century finance knows no true geographic borders. Money and risk can move around the globe with a touch of a button. Sober evidence of this was AIG’s swaps affiliate, AIG Financial Products, which had its major operations in London. When it failed, the U.S. economy and taxpayers shouldered a tremendous burden.

The current debt crisis in Europe is but a stark reminder of our interconnectedness. Moreover, it is precisely during times of heightened market uncertainty that transparent pricing of risk is essential. While European leaders are working to avert a deepening crisis, it is critical that we implement the Dodd-Frank Act to protect the American public.

We are actively consulting and coordinating with international regulators to promote robust and consistent standards in swaps oversight. We are sharing many of our memos, term sheets and draft work product with international regulators. Building on these efforts, I will be traveling to London to discuss derivatives reform as well as issues relating to high-frequency trading.

We also will work with international colleagues on memoranda of understanding for access to information and cooperative oversight. We also have a long history of recognizing foreign regulatory regimes. The Dodd-Frank Act authorizes the CFTC to recognize foreign regulatory frameworks that are comprehensive and comparable to U.S. oversight of the swaps markets in certain areas. We also anticipate seeking public input on the application of Section 722(d) of the Dodd-Frank Act, which says that the law doesn’t apply to activities outside the United States unless those activities have a direct and significant connection with activities in, or effect on, U.S. commerce.

So, let’s get this straight… The Dodd-Frank Act was a tool by Congress to prohibit one of government’s regulatory corporations (the Commodities Futures Trading Commission – CFTC) to act outside of United States jurisdiction as long as the activities to be regulated are outside of the United States? Yes sir. But the reality of what this means is even more shocking. For when the term “outside of the United States” is utilized here, it is referring to United States borders (remember, they are paper borders created by treaty and international agreements). This is where “Inland Ports” and “Foreign Trade Zones” come into play. This is how your “country” (both the land and the government) is incrementally being pulled out from under your feet – while American Idol agonizingly plays in the other room – through contracts, treaties, and international agreements.

If we were to look at a true representative interactive map of the borders of the United States, it would actually look like a U.S. shaped slice of Swiss cheese. Incrementally, as each Inland Port and Foreign Trade Zone is implemented, a new hole in the middle of the United States appears, where U.S. laws are non-existent.

Let’s take a land-locked state like Colorado for example. As there are no oceans (international waters) touching any of Colorado’s borders (the land), there is only one way to create an Inland Port in this state. The state must become a virtual body of water.

When an Inland Port is created, it becomes an international jurisdiction under international Maritime Law. And since Maritime/Admiralty law is the “law of the sea”, the land must become a port among a body of water in legal terms. Thus, as a port receiving trade through trade-routes, the land now becomes international jurisdiction. it’s brilliant really, when you stop and think about it. Suddenly a port pops up in the middle of of the land, with no water around it whatsoever. And yet it falls under the law of the sea!

So how is this accomplished?

Perhaps you’ve heard of the controversial NAFTA Super Highways…

You see, the rest of the United States (the land) becomes a “land-bridge” over virtual (paper) water between these ports and zones, and the roads and highways now outside of the United States called NAFTA represent international virtual waterways under international Admiralty Law going from Inland Port to Inland Port. Thus, the whole structure of ports and highways are under the law of the sea – outside of the United States. Why start a limited corporation in the great state of Colorado when you can move 10 miles away into an unlimited Foreign Trade Zone? Why hire American workers with all of their demands and minimum wages laws when you can hire foreigners living in these Foreign Zones? After all, anyone can live and work in the Zones without being a United States citizen. And with no U.S. labor laws, health insurance, or pension funding requirements for retirement, why hire American when you can hire Chinese, Indonesian, or Indian at a fraction of the cost? It’s just on the other side of the Highway you know…

In the middle of America…

So now let’s get back to government’s opinion:

“The House and Senate Reports accompanying the legislation virtually compel this conclusion, explaining as they do that “a foreign government’s . . . employment or engagement of laborers, clerical staff or marketing agents . . . would be among those included within” the definition of commercial activity. H.R.Rep. No. 94-1487, p. 16 (1976) (House Report); S. Rep. No. 94-1310, p. 16 (1976) (Senate Report)…”

“I had thought the [507 U.S. 349, 369] issue put to rest some time ago when, in a slightly different context, CHIEF JUSTICE Marshall observed:

“It is, we think, a sound principle, that when a government becomes a partner in any trading company, it divests itself, so far as concerns the transactions of that company, of its sovereign character, and takes that of a private citizen. Instead of communicating to the company its privileges and its prerogatives, it descends to a level with those with whom it associates itself, and takes the character which belongs to its associates, and to the business which is to be transacted. Thus, many States of this Union who have an interest in Banks, are not suable even in their own Courts; yet they never exempt the corporation from being sued. The State of Georgia, by giving to the Bank the capacity to sue and be sued, voluntarily strips itself of its sovereign character, so far as respects the transactions of the Bank, and waives all the privileges of that character. As a member of a corporation, a government never exercises its sovereignty. It acts merely as a corporator, and exercises no other power in the management of the affairs of the corporation, than are expressly given by the incorporating act.” –U.S. Supreme Court, Bank of the United States v. Planters’ Bank of Georgia (1824) 22 US (9 Wheat) 904, 6 L.Ed 244

See also Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. Republic of Cuba, 425 U.S. 682, 695 -696 (1976) (plurality opinion).”

(Source: http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=507&invol=349)

According to Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, under the definition for the word “corporation”, it states:

“Chief Justice Marshall describes a corporation to be “an artificial being, invisible, intangible, and existing only in contemplation of law. Being the mere creature of law,” continues the judge, “it possesses only those properties which the charter of its creation confers upon it, either expressly or as incidental to its very existence. These are such as are supposed best calculated to effect the object for which it was created. Among the most important are immortality, and if the expression may be allowed, individuality properties by which a perpetual succession of many persons are considered, as the same, and may act as the single individual, They enable a corporation to manage its own affairs, and to hold property without the perplexing intricacies, the hazardous and endless necessity of perpetual conveyance for the purpose of transmitting it from hand to hand. It is chiefly for the purpose of clothing bodies of men, in succession, with these qualities and capacities, that corporations were invented, and are in use.”

(Author’s Note: It is important to note here that technically the corporation of the United States or portions thereof can be “conveyed” to foreign hands, including the United Nations. Remember, this is all on paper, through treaties and agreements. And it wont likely make the nightly news as it happens piece by piece, port by port, zone by zone… This can all be done while never changing the corporate charter name of “United States” or of states, counties, cities (municipal corporations), and districts.)

And this legal definition goes on to state:

Corporation: “Nations or states, are denominated by publicists, bodies politic, and are said to have their affairs and interests, and to deliberate and resolve, in common. They thus become as moral persons, having an understanding and will peculiar to themselves, and are susceptible of obligations and laws. Vattel, 49. In this extensive sense the United States may be termed a corporation; and so may each state singly.”

And Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856, defines the word corporator as:

CORPORATOR. One who is a member of a corporation. 2. In general, a corporator is entitled to enjoy all the benefits and rights which belong to any other member of the corporation as such. But in some corporations, where the rights are of a pecuniary nature, each corporator is entitles to those rights in proportion to his interest; he will therefore be entitled to vote only in proportion to the amount of his stock, and be entitled to dividends in the same proportion. 3. A corporator is not in general liable personally for any act of the corporation, unless he has been made so by the charter creating the corporation.

(Author’s Note: This means the American people can be made liable for United Nations debt or funding, and that the United States is a member- i. e. not a “sovereign” entity – with only a “vote” in world affairs, including its own.)

Note here that the United States is a “member” of the United Nations, and of the International Monetary Fund (World Bank).

Can you put the pieces together?

And of course when Bouvier’s defines the United States, it says:

UNION. By this word is understood the United States of America; as, all good citizens will support the Union.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. The name of this country. The United States… 5. The United States of America are a corporation endowed with the capacity to sue and be sued, to convey and receive property.

Again from the Supreme Court – near the year of the founding of this “country”…

“If Congress, previous to the Articles of Confederation, possessed any authority, it was an authority, as I have shown, derived from the people of each province in the first instance. When the obnoxious acts of Parliament passed, if the people in each province had chosen to resist separately, they undoubtedly had equal right to do so as to join in general measures of resistance with the people of the other provinces, however unwise and destructive such a policy might and undoubtedly would have been. If they had pursued this separate system, and afterwards the people of each province had resolved that such province should be a free and independent state, the state from that moment would have become possessed of all the powers of sovereignty internal and external — viz., the exclusive right of providing for their own government, and regulating their intercourse with foreign nations — as completely as any one of the ancient kingdoms or republics of the world, which never yet had formed or thought of forming any sort of federal union whatever. A distinction was taken at the bar between a state and the people of the state. It is a distinction I am not capable of comprehending. By a state forming a republic (speaking of it as a moral person) I do not mean the legislature of the state, the executive of the state, or the judiciary, but all the citizens which compose that state and are, if I may so express myself, integral parts of it, all together forming a body politic. The great distinction between monarchies and republics (at least our republics) in general is that in the former, the monarch is considered as the sovereign, and each individual of his nation as subject to him, though in some countries with many important special limitations. This, I say, is generally the case, for it has not been so universally.

But in a republic, all the citizens, as such, are equal, and no citizen can rightfully exercise any authority over another but in virtue of a power constitutionally given by the whole community, and such authority, when exercised, is in effect an act of the whole community which forms such body politic. In such governments, therefore, the sovereignty resides in the great body of the people, but it resides in them not as so many distinct individuals, but in their politic capacity only. Thus A. B. C. and D., citizens of Pennsylvania and as such together with all the citizens of Pennsylvania, share in the sovereignty of the state. Suppose a state to consist exactly of the number of 100,000 citizens, and it were practicable for all of them to assemble at one time and in one place, and that 99,999 did actually assemble. The state would not be in fact assembled. Why? Because the state in fact is composed of all the citizens, not of a part only, however large that part may be, and one is wanting, in the same manner as 99 is not a hundred, because one pound is wanting to complete the full sum.

But as such exactness in human affairs cannot take place, as the world would be at an end or involved in universal massacre and confusion if entire unanimity from every society was required; as the assembling in large numbers, if practicable as to the actual meeting of all the citizens, or even a considerable part of them, could be productive of no rational result because there could be no general debate, no consultation of the whole, nor of consequence a determination grounded on reason and reflection, and a deliberate view of all the circumstances necessary to be taken into consideration, mankind has long practiced (except where special exceptions have been solemnly adopted) upon the principle that the majority shall bind the whole, and in large countries, at least, that representatives shall be chosen to act on the part of the whole. But when they do so, they decide for the whole, and not for themselves only.

Thus when the legislature of any state passes a bill by a majority, competent to bind the whole, it is an act of the whole assembly, not of the majority merely. So when this Court gives a judgment by the opinion of a majority, it is the judgment, in a legal sense, of the whole Court. So I conceive when any law is passed in any state in pursuance of constitutional authority, it is a law of the whole state acting in its legislative capacity, as are also executive and judiciary acts constitutionally authorized, acts of the whole state in its executive or judiciary capacity, and not the personal acts alone of the individuals, composing those branches of government. The same principles apply as to legislative, executive, or judicial acts of the United States, which are acts of the people of the United States in those respective capacities, as the former are of the people of a single state. These principles have long been familiar in regard to the exercise of a constitutional power as to treaties. These are deemed the treaties of the two nations, not of the persons only whose authority was actually employed in their formation. There is not one principle that I can imagine which gives such an effect as to treaties that has not such an operation on any other legitimate act of government, all powers being equally derived from the same fountain, all held equally in trust, and all, when rightfully exercised, equally binding upon those from whom the authority was derived.

I conclude, therefore, that every particle of authority which originally resided either in Congress or in any branch of the state governments was derived from the people who were permanent inhabitants of each province in the first instance and afterwards became citizens of each state; that this authority was conveyed by each body politic separately, and not by all the people in the several provinces or states jointly, and of course that no authority could be conveyed to the whole but that which previously was possessed by the several parts; that the distinction between a state and the people of a state has in this respect no foundation, each expression in substance meaning the same thing; consequently, that one ground of argument at the bar, tending to show the superior sovereignty of Congress in the instance in question, was not tenable, and therefore that upon that ground the exercise of the authority in question can not be supported.”

(Source: http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/3/54/case.html)

This important opinion tells you one very important thing… You do not now or did they then live in a true idealistic republic! If you are a citizen, you are nothing more than a part of the whole citizenry (in this case equality is a bad thing, for it takes away your rights). You are the State – a tiny piece of the jigsaw puzzle made up of equal size citizens. The people and the State are the same thing. “Distinct individuals have no power or sovereignty – only the state does as a body politic of all the people combined. This literally squashes the theory that in the United States all men are kings of themselves. This is just a falacy to be shelved with all the other “free country” myths out there. And the State creates these treaties and agreements with Foreign entities with the legal presumption that you don’t give a damn!

You aren’t fighting it, if you even know about it, and so the plans for world governance and the conveyance of the United States lands into United Nations (NWO) hands goes on unhindered.

For some clarification, here are the Bovier’s Law Dictionary definitions of a “Republic”:

REPUBLIC. A commonwealth; that form of government in which the administration of affairs is open to all the citizens. In another sense, it signifies the state, independently of its form of government. 1 Toull. n. 28, and n. 202, note. In this sense, it is used by Ben Johnson. Those that, by their deeds make it known, whose dignity they do sustain; And life, state, glory, all they gain, Count the Republic’s, not their own, Vide Body Politic; Nation; State.

REPUBLICAN GOVERNMENT. A government in the republican form; a government of the people; it is usually put in opposition to a monarchical or aristocratic government. 2. The fourth section of the fourth article of the constitution, directs that “the United States shall guaranty to every state in the Union a republican form of government.” The form of government is to be guarantied, which supposes a form already established, and this is the republican form of government the United States have undertaken to protect. See Story, Const. §1807.

Yet another common fallacy squashed by the constitution itself!

Some how the people of the United States have mixed up the notion that the “United States” government – the central government of Washington D.C. as a federation – is supposed to be a republic. But this is not what the constitution states at all. The only requirement of the United States Federal Government laid out in its constitution is that the United States corporation in Washington D.C. must protect the already establish form of government of each individual state. Remember, the citizen is subject to two forms of government, one the state and one Federal.

On this, the Supreme Court state its opinion:

“The people of the United States resident within any State are subject to two Governments: one State, and the other National; but there need be no conflict between the two. The powers which one possesses, the other does not. They are established for different purposes, and have separate jurisdictions. Together they make one whole, and furnish the people of the United States with a complete government, ample for the protection of all their rights at home and abroad. True, it may sometimes happen that a person is amenable to both jurisdictions for one and the same act… It is the natural consequence of a citizenship which owes allegiance to two sovereignties, and claims protection from both. The citizen cannot complain, because he has voluntarily submitted himself to such a form of government.–The Supreme Court, 92 US 551: “U.S. v Cruikshank”

While you may live in a republic within your individual state, you do not live in a republic called the United States. The distinction here is absolutely key, and the tempering of fallacious considerations of the intent of the national government

And if “Common Law” is your bag, you should know that in the same case the Supreme Court stated its opinion about the Common Law:

“It is a rule at common law (the reason applies in equity and other civil law cases) that if a party can plead a fact material to his defense, and omits to do it at the proper time, he can never avail himself of it afterwards.”

Now why would anyone in their right mind agree to such a sinister and offending rule as this? And why would anyone submit to this?

Can you imagine…

You: Oh yeah judge, I forgot to mention that I have a video tape and 20 witnesses that saw me 1,000 miles away from the scene of the crime at the exact time of the crime.

Judge (as his gavel smashes down): Inadmissible! Guilty as charged!!!

It goes on to say:

“The law rather chooses that a party should incur a risk of this nature than leave a door open to endless litigation upon pretenses the truth of which it is very difficult to discover.”

God forbid we should have long litigation in order to discover the truth!

This is called the “justice system”, by the way. And the only thing common about common law is that it is commonly tyrannical just like any other legal system. Even if you had a good experience in court by a judge who seemed lawful or constitutional, this does not dismiss the fact that at any time this type of “opinion” can arise. It’s a rule that a judge may choose to follow at his whim. And while a man acting as judge may certainly consider late evidence, he certainly is not required to. Law means nothing to a corrupt politician or judge. And it is certainly a fallacy to overlook the rules just because once you had a good experience. The fallacy: This judge acted fairly and constitutionally, therefore all judges act fairly and constitutionally.

In this particular case, believe it or not, the “person” harmed was actually physically dead, but since the defendants did not claim this fact within the discovery process, this fact actually had no bearing on the case. The fact that the person was dead was not considered when doing wrong to that person. Image how that felt to the defendants when those words were uttered by the judge, who were no doubt thinking… Why in the hell would this fact even need to be mentioned???

It states:

“II. The death of Doane has been alleged for another purpose.

It is said that the decree is to restore to Elisha Doane, which was impossible because Elisha Doane was not then in being. Admitting that upon this record we are to take judicial notice that Doane was dead at the time of pronouncing the decree (in which I am by no means clear), yet if this was the real reason why the plaintiffs in error had withheld the property or its proceeds, they might themselves have said so. They have not, and as each party generally makes the best of his own case, we are to presume that did not in fact constitute their reason. In this case it could be of no avail but at the utmost to prevent the allowance of interest until a demand actually made. It never could destroy the whole beneficial effect of a decree given in rem, and when the parties who make the objection were in court and parties to the very decree complained of. I think nothing can be more evident than that if the decree be not totally void, the administrators are entitled to the benefit of it, at least until it is set aside for error, if there be any error in it, and such a remedy is now practicable. If a scire facias was necessary before execution could have been obtained out of the court which passed the decree, it could be for no other reason than that the other party might have an opportunity to contest the validity of the letters and the existence of the administration, if any such objection could be supported. Such an objection might have been made here. It has not been made. There is therefore, I conceive, no principle of law or justice which forbids giving effect to the decree upon this ground.”

You: But judge, the victim was already dead before I had anything to do with her!

Judge: Inadmissible! Guilty as charged!!!

Ok, extreme I admit. The point is that the possibility – as a rule – is that at any time a judge can dismiss crucial evidence that would prove your innocence without considering it.

But listen to what was stated even later in this case:

“A court of justice, indeed, ought at its peril to take notice of its own jurisdiction, and it is not often that cases of such doubt arise that a judge can be at a loss on the subject. But it may happen and does sometimes happen that innocent and serious doubts are really entertained. Is a court therefore, because its judgments may be finally dissented from by a superior tribunal, to be considered as flying in the face of the law, so that parties before it shall not only be protected in disobeying it but punished for their obedience? If this be the case, the old maxim cedunt arma togae (let arms yield to the toga – modern: let military power give way to civil power) will very ill apply to courts of justice. Instead of being the peaceful arbiters of right and the sacred asylum of unprotected innocence, their very forums will be the seat of war and confusion.”

Why is this all so important to the establishment of a New World Order Government?

Well let’s see… so far the Supreme court has allowed corporations to be people with rights, allowed these corporations to merge and acquire each other to establish monopolies and trusts,  allowed these corporations not only to clone life but to create new genetically altered life and then patent that life-form as a novel (unique) property of the corporation and government, it has ruled that children can be vaccinated without parental consent, it has allowed the United Nations to claim a part of the City of New York as international land immune from U.S. law, and seems to not be at all concerned with the thousands of Presidential Directives and Executive Orders that have allowed everything from martial law in America to unmanned drones for the use of killing Americans abroad and spying on them nationally.

Now why in God’s name would I put my trust in this body of “Justices” to do the right thing in protecting me or my country or to  combat the implementation of world governance? They are, after all, appointed by the same president and congress that is allowing it to happen in the first place! They aren’t even voted in by the people who suffer their opinions!!!

So what does it mean to you to” fight for your country”?

Well, you better start comprehending that your country and your state is in the control of a rogue government, and that to save the land the government must not be allowed to expand globally by expanding its ream of paper to include all of the United Nations as it’s master.

The “United States” is in the process of becoming  nothing more than an admiralty law-based “land-bridge” between oceans and countries, a port of call for the world government and its corporations built with your taxpayer money.

And all of this proving the pen is mightier than the sword, simply because the people will not wield the sword as their fore-fathers supposedly did.

In our interview, we discussed that in order to create a new World Government, the current borders of the United States must be destroyed. It is, however, important to state that the individual state governments and borders need not be demolished simply because the Federal government and borders are abolished. It is in fact the contractual nature of the individual states to this central government which is the cause of the loss of individual state sovereignty. As individual republics, under a new United States “union” the country would be no less grand.

Is it only me that feels this way?

…whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness… all experience hath shown, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”

–Constitution of the united states of America

“Whenever the ends of government are perverted, and public liberty manifestly endangered, and all other means of redress are ineffectual, the people may, and of right ought to reform the old, or establish a new government. The doctrine of nonresistance against arbitrary power, and oppression, is absurd, slavish, and destructive of the good and happiness of mankind.”

–New Hampshire Constitution, Article 10 of the Bill of Rights

“All power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority and instituted for their peace, safety, happiness and the protection of property. For the advancement of these ends, they have at all times an inalienable and indefeasible right to alter, reform or abolish their government in such manner as they may deem proper.”

–Kentucky Constitution, Kentucky Bill of Rights

“All power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority and instituted for their peace, safety and happiness. For the advancement of these ends they have at all times an inalienable and indefeasible right to alter, reform or abolish their government in such manner as they may think proper.”

–Pennsylvania Constitution, Article 1, Section 2 of the Declaration of Rights

“3d. That Government ought to be instituted for the common benefit, protection and security of the people; and that the doctrine of non-resistance against arbitrary power and oppression is absurd, slavish, and destructive to the good and happiness of mankind.”

–North Carolina Constitution, November 21, 1789

All political power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority, and instituted for their benefit. The faith of the people of Texas stands pledged to the preservation of a republican form of government, and, subject to this limitation only, they have at all times the inalienable right to alter, reform or abolish their government in such manner as they may think expedient.”

–Texas Constitution, Article 1, Section 2

“Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by rule of law.”

–Universal Declaration Of Human Rights, United Nations (paying lip service to this decree with despicable arrogance and confidence as it subsumes all other constitutions!)

So what part of this aren’t you comprehending?

And just what do you think the 2nd amendment is for?

Better listen to the show now folks, and start to grasp exactly what’s happening in a local, county, district, state, and national government near you. For right this very second, government is doing all of the above for you, on paper, handing over the “country” to a global corporate federation, making the above options of abolition obsolete and unlawful with each treaty and contract your representatives sign, conveying the land to foreign interests…

And remember, just because you don’t see it doesn’t change the fact that it”s happening…

This is what you are truly fighting:

And the future of food (just replace metal powder with protein powder):

Truth is so much stranger than fiction, and so much closer to science fiction than imaginable.

In closing, I can only say that no matter what your “country” means to you; no matter how you define it – I think now would be a good time to start fighting for it while it’s still recognizable as such, and while we still have a resemblance to natural humans.

.

–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Monday, February 11th, 2013

Zionism 101 – The Complete Story


 

≈Ω≈

To listen to the voice recording of this essay,

please click HERE to download. (3 hours!)

 

≈Ω≈

Please see part 2 of this essay here: http://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2010/08/29/zionism-101-the-zionist-israeli-government-of-the-united-states-of-amerika/

≈Ω≈

Author’s note: I have put off tackling this subject publicly and in depth for a long time, not wanting to believe in its veracity nor in the reality that mankind can be this dark and evil. And as I began my research, with the limited knowledge that I’d already acquired on the subject, it was intended to be the story of Zionism through only the quote’s of Zionists in their own words. But as the real history of Zionism became horrifically apparent through painstaking research and comprehension, I decided to turn this into an essay intended as a historical swim through the darkest bowels of human history, at the risk of illogical racist labels and public gelding of my credibility in the stead of logical discussion and debate, and despite the blatant Zionist quotes, which are referenced and sourced herein. I can only ask that whoever you are, no matter your color or creed or religion or race, that you read or listen to this essay in its entirety, with the foreknowledge that race, prejudice, or hatred is left at the door in regards to the writing contained within… and that the point in history for there to still be “a point in history” that this can all be turned around is approaching so quickly, that it may already be too late. I apologize to anyone whose material that I may have emulated but not sourced, if that is the case. It was unintentional, and I personally thank you for your bravery in going against the most powerful evil force on this planet with the most powerful lobby’s and political control in the world. I would also ask that, if any of this can be dis-proven, please, please, please make the evidence available to me so that I can correct this essay. I’d like nothing more than to be wrong about the following information. And of all the subjects I’ve researched, this is the one that I’ve hoped against all hope is not true, because this truly is the source of evil in this world. As the author, I hold no indemnity or copyright for this writing nor the recording attached, and would ask that you please pass this on to everyone you can if it so moves you, keeping all sources intact, and with the soul intention of the protection of all of our multi-faceted histories, cultural heritages, and our beautiful spectrum of colors… and in the interests of erasing a long history of falsified and indoctrinating education in this world.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

“To see what is in front of one´s nose requires a constant struggle.”

—George Orwell, 1946

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

“None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.”

—Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

“There is nothing more frightening than active ignorance.”

Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

 

Recently, the news of yet another outrageous Israeli terror attack came to light. This time, it was against an aid boat in international waters trying to sail to the Gaza Strip to deliver much needed humanitarian aid, medical supplies, and some food to the Palestinians there – who are refugees in their own land and homes. Of course, if Israel is in the middle of a genocide of the Palestinians, allowing foreign aid and medical supplies into the strip wouldn’t make much sense, would it? A bit like providing an antidote to the poison for someone you want to murder…

Since the significance (and repetitiveness) of this attack (and the cold blooded murder of the twenty or so activists on board) might be lost on some of you, I wanted to write this essay to open your eyes to just what the state of Israel represents, to explain the difference between the Jewish people and the Zionist movement, and to develop a comprehension on how this Zionist movement has taken over almost every aspect of American society, its media, the world banking and corporate structure, and how this small group has infiltrated our churches and our culture with the intention of subverting it, destroying our country, and stealing our wealth and virtue.

Now, this may sound like a hard claim to prove, like a “conspiracy theory” if you will… and I’ll admit that it took a while for me to truly comprehend this conundrum, since I’ve (we’ve) been indoctrinated with holocaust stories and movies our entire lives. But this is actually one of the easiest things I’ve written about. Why? Because all I have to do is use their own words! By simply quoting these Zionist harbingers of war, destruction, and death, there can be no doubt of their intentions or of their plan (conspiracy) to dominate and control America and the world.

But before we begin, I want to deeply stress the fact that Zionist’s do not care about the good Jewish people. They are cattle to them, just as much as the rest of the Gentiles on Earth; we are the Goyim. Opposing Zionism is not in any way opposing real Jews. They are not at all synonymous, though many Jews are brainwashed into the Zionist movement. Also, there are countless Jews whom are vehemently opposed to Zionism and even to the state of Israel. And there are many websites, like: Jews Against Zionism and Jews Against Israel to underscore this divide. So please read this essay without passing judgment on the Jewish race itself, for Americans aren’t the only culture that can be stupid enough to be fooled into supporting murder and genocide. Remember that, for we are all sheep to Rothschild created Zionist elite. And it is important to understand that the word “Jew” in many of the below quotes is not referring to the Jewish race as a whole, but to the Zionist cult that has risen up and embedded themselves within the Jewish society, using the Jewish people as fodder, and hiding within their culture so that they can name anyone who opposes them as an anti-Semite (or anti-Jew).

And so I say that this essay is as much for the good Jewish people – as fellow humans of this Earth – as it is for all Gentiles (Goyim) who may be reading or listening. It is even for the supremacist Zionists, whom I hope will see the error of their ways in supporting and following this atrocity called Zionism.

Please drop your pre-conceived notions and indoctrination, and read or listen to this entire essay, for the full context of the quotes by mostly Jewish Zionist’s will astound you….

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

And now… let these Zionist words be your guide…

But first, let’s start with a short history lesson:

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Question: What is the only country in the Middle-East that has made actual repeated, admitted, and well-documented terrorist attacks against America?

In the 1950’s in what is now called the Lavon Affair, the Israeli government sent Jewish agents into Egypt to blow up American movie theaters, libraries, and other American targets. But when a Jewish terrorist’s bomb exploded prematurely, the incident led to the capture of the entire Israeli terrorist cell involved. As with all political terrorism by a government, this attack was meant to lead America into a war with the innocent nation of Egypt. However, since Israel was caught red-handed, and it admitted in the Jerusalem Post to the terrorist attack against America, Egypt was saved by grace. But the Zionist/Jewish dominated media of America quickly swept this Israeli Government attack against America under the carpet. If carried out in its intended clandestine fashion, America would have attacked Egypt. But no retaliatory strike was submitted against Israel, and no war ensued. Instead, America just continues year after year to send weapons, bombs, and billions of American tax-payer dollars to Israel, which wouldn’t exist without United States and other countries funding it from around the world.

(headline) “Israel Honors Heroes of Lavon Affair” (article) “Although it is still a sensitive situation, we decided to express our respect for these heroes, President Moshe Katzav said…” — Jewish Newspaper, Haarets.com, which never made mainstream American news. Israeli President Katzav then presented three surviving members of the Lavon Affair with certificates of appreciation at a Jerusalem ceremony. June 1, 2006.

Despite the fact that the president of Israel calls these terrorists heroes, not a single Congressman, Senator or media outlet in America spoke negatively of Israel for praising the Israeli Zionist terrorists who committed this false flag terrorist attack against Egypt and America. Remember, the word terrorism throughout history is rooted from governments using terror to inflict political change and as a pretext to war.

In 1967, Israel committed another false flag terrorist attack against America when it bombed the USS Liberty. On a crystal clear day, Israel attacked a fully-marked American intelligence ship, which was in international waters and flying the American flag. After close monitoring by Israeli pilots for “several days”, the Israeli air force in a surprise attack began dropping Napalm onto the USS Liberty, even as the men on board helplessly waved to what they at first thought were friendly planes in friendly fire. After burning some of the ships men, they began using cannon and machine gun fire against the ship. After considerable damage, Israel came at the ship with torpedo boats in a failed attempt to sink the USS Liberty and ensure the deaths of all aboard. They even machine-gunned the life rafts that the crew had deployed when it looked as if the Liberty was going to sink, which is a major war crime.

34 Americans were murdered, and 173 Americans were wounded, maimed, and burned from Napalm, some beyond recognition.

Again, Egypt was to be officially blamed for the attack, just as it was to be for the Lavon Affair.

“Israel made a knowing and deliberate attack against the USS Liberty…we refused to accept their explanations. I didn’t believe them then, and I don’t believe them to this day. The attack was outrageous.” —Dean Rusk, U.S Secretary of State.

(headline) “Israel communications said to prove IAF knew Liberty was U.S. ship.” (article) “The Israel Air Force warplanes and Israel Navy warships that attacked the USS Liberty on June 8, 1967, at the height of the Six-Day War, were aware that the vessel was an American spy ship, according to new testimony published Thursday in the Chicago Tribune.” —Jewish correspondent Yossi Melman, Haaretz.com, a Jewish newspaper.

“These soldiers and Marines were entitled to our best defense. We gave them no defense. Did our government put Israel’s interests ahead of our own? If so, why? Does our government continue to subordinate American interests? The American people deserve to know the truth about this attack… It is a duty we owe not only to the brave men of the USS Liberty, but to every man and woman who is asked to wear the uniform of the United States.” —Thomas Moorer, Former Chairman of The Joint Chiefs of Staff, who was privy to top secret documents pertaining to the USS Liberty.

“I WANT THAT DAMN SHIP SUNK” —President Lyndon B. Johnson, overheard by several witnesses through radio on ships within range to assist the USS Liberty, but whom were ordered not to.

Dozens of Israeli spies have been caught in the United States since the USS Liberty attack. The most famous of these was an American Zionist Jew named Johnathan Pollard. Even the Jewish-descended Casper Weinberger stated that the the Pollard spy case was the most damaging spy case in the history of America. Pollard stole top secret information regarding American intelligence operatives and sources in Europe. Israel then sold this information and names of these operatives to the Soviets, causing the capture, torture, and killing of hundreds of U.S. operatives in Eastern Europe.

“No one in the history of the United States who spied… came close to causing the colossal damage Pollard did to our national security.” —Ron Olive, Chief U.S. Investigator.

“American Jew arrested for spying: I did it for Israel.”   —Jeruselem Post, front page headline.

The fact is… year after year, America just keeps exporting more taxpayer money to Israel, and even continues to send weapons and bombs. The people of Palestine are literally being killed with these weapons paid for by all U.S. citizens. We cannot blame our government, without blaming ourselves for letting this happen right under our noses.

Israel is one of the only countries in the Middle East who has consistently refused to sign the Nuclear non-proliferation treaty. Iraq, Afghanistan, and most importantly Iran have all signed this treaty, AND DO NOT HAVE NUCLEAR WEAPONS! Yet these are the countries America attack’s in Israel’s name. A bully always attacks the week.

Israel is also the only country in the Middle East that has a huge stockpile of nuclear weapons. Israel has over 200 nuclear warheads in its possession – not a good thing for a supremest terrorist state to have, if I don’t say so myself… Yet the United States government and its media almost completely ignores this fact, and attacks without just cause all of the Arab countries which pose absolutely no threat to Americans in any way – countries which should be our allies in commerce and peace. And America does this because it is the will of Israel. America’s foreign policy is dictated by the pro-Israel Zionist’s who have usurped this country, its government, its wealth and commerce structure, its media, and its peoples public opinion about itself and Israel.

“(Zionist Jews, he himself) doesn’t believe in western morality… The only way to fight a moral war is the Jewish way: destroy their holy sites. Kill men, women, and children (and cattle).” —Manis Friedman, famous Jewish Rabbi.

“We can still remember the smell of Auschwitz and Treblinka… next time we will take all of you with us!” —Israeli official, as quoted by Semour M. Hersh’s “The Samson Option”.

On October 12, 2000, the U.S.S. Cole was attacked while harbored and refueling in the Yemeni port of Aden. 17 American sailors were killed, and 39 were injured. The attack was conveniently blamed on Al Qaeda, who claimed fairy-tale like convenient responsibility (in the Zionist controlled media) as a suicide bombing. The U.S. government held the Arab nation of Sudan liable for the attack, and froze the countries assets.

According to former CIA intelligence officer Robert Finke, the blast appeared to be caused by explosives molded into a shaped charge against the hull of the boat. It was speculated at the time that over 1,000 pounds of explosive were used.

Does this sound like a suicide attack? That’s a lot of explosives! I certainly can’t squat 1000 pounds…

It is important to note that FBI Special Agent John O’Neil had quit his job at the FBI after his investigation into the U.S.S. Cole attack in Yemen was obstructed and sabotaged by U.S ambassador to Yemen, Zionist Barbara Bodine. This is because the U.S.S. Cole was NOT done by Al Qaeda. The USS Cole was hit by an Israeli cruise missile (Source, 39th pp) to sway public opinion against Arabs (Al Qaeda), as well as to demonize the democrats (whom publically didn’t take the terror threat seriously) so that their Zionist Israel friendly puppet George W. Bush Jr. could be hurled into office in time for 9/11 with a rigged election. This was of course completely covered up.

More on John O’Neil below…

The events of September 11, 2001 have been white-washed by the government and the American media to reflect only Arab involvement. Of course, Israel’s sworn enemy is the entirety of the Arab nations.

“One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail.” —Rabbi Yaacov Perrin, New York Daily News, February 28, 1994, page 6.

“Even the best of the non-Jews should all be killed.” —Rabbi Simon ben Yahai, Talmud, Minor Tractates, Soferim 15, Rule 10.

There is overwhelming evidence that the Mossad, the equivalent of the CIA in Israel, is the party most responsible for 9/11. From Israeli companies paying huge fines for breaking their leases to exit the World Trade Center just days before 9/11, to the many Jewish people told not to fly and to stay out of the World Trade Center buildings on that day (only five Israelis died on 9/11, and two of the five were supposedly aboard the supposedly hijacked flights – however, many good regular Jewish people did die that day), to the obvious involvement and cover-up of top Zionist and pro-Israel U.S. officials in offices of political power, to the fact that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11, to the fact that Osama Bin Laden (whose CIA asset name was indeed Mr. Tim Osman) was never actually charged with any crime related to 9/11, to the fact that Israel is steering the United States in the direction of war (undeclared war through occupation and destruction of infrastructure and takeover and theft of resources) with innocent Arab countries despite continuously being caught in false flag terrorist attacks for which they blame on these Arab nations, to the reality of claims that Israeli Mossad agents are generally responsible for killing our soldiers in so-called “suicide bombings” and other attacks for which they portray as being perpetrated by Muslim Al Qaeda “insurgents” in a fake, undeclared war in Iraq and Afghanistan.

“Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target U.S. forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act.” —SAMS officers, about the the Israeli intelligence service MOSSAD, and reported in the Washington Post on September 10, 2001.

The word Al Qaeda has a few interpretations…. interestingly, it was the name given to a CIA computer program many years ago before the terrorist group supposedly emerged

Perhaps more interestingly, it is hilariously also used as a slang for “the toilet”.

Yeah… if I were a terrorist group, I’d call myself “The Toilet” too… Imagine a Mexican gang naming themselves El Bano, or a French gang called La Bidet!

Former FBI Special Agent John O’neil, who was tasked with investigating Bin Laden (and had classified information), was hired as the head of security at the World Trade Center after leaving the CIA by staunch Jewish Zionist Jerome Hauer, who had advised the White House to go on the anti-biotic effective against Anthrax — Cipro — a week prior to the actual mailings of anthrax later blamed on “Al Qaeda terrorists”. Hauer was an ‘expert’ in bio-terrorism and in charge of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) response to the anthrax “attacks”.

In a more than obvious conspiracy, John O’neil was killed on his FIRST DAY OF WORK at the WTC, which was September 11, 2001.

Philip Zelikow, who is a dual citizen of Israel and the United States (as were many others in the Bush cabinet) – was appointed the executive director of the 9/11 commission… In other words, a Zionist Israeli held the most powerful position on the 9/11 committee! This criminal Zionist Jew was responsible for concocting the “official story” of 9/11, as reported in the 9/11 Commission Report.

For the full Zionist 9/11 story, go here: http://pakalert.wordpress.com/2009/12/01/israel-did-911-all-the-proof-in-the-world/

…and by all means, do the research and verify this for yourself!

9/11 was just another false flag attack carried out by Zionist Israel, blamed on the Arab countries once again, and used as a catapult to force the American people through government control into unpopular terrorist attacks on friendly Arab nations, with the people’s unwittingly misguided support. But in reality, since our own government is jam pack full of Zionist, duel Israeli citizens and traitors to our country, it was our government that let it happen, for the same reasons: to kill millions of innocent Arab men, women, and children in the name of Zionism and Israel. And America continues to fight Israel’s false wars… with U.S. taxpayer money.

And finally, just today I found a press release from Washington that almost seemed to encourage my pursuit of this subject…

“Declassified files detailing an FBI investigation targeting the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC – the most powerful lobby in the United States) are now available on the Internet. AIPAC was investigated after it acquired and circulated classified government information provided in strict confidence by US industry and worker groups opposed to AIPAC sponsored economic legislation.” —PRNewswire-USNewswire, Forbes, March 10, 2010

The full article can be seen here: http://www.forbes.com/feeds/prnewswire/2010/03/10/prnewswire201003101051PR_NEWS_USPR_____DC68258.html

The article details leaked classified information, corporate espionage, usurpation of government authority with Israeli intelligence officers undercover in AIPAC, theft of government property, Dan Halpern interviews admitting to passing classified U.S. documents to AIPAC as well as lists of the trators, and more. These files are available on the internet for the first time, and should be utilized while the internet still can be.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Ever heard about the real holocaust?

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

From 1917 to 1945, the “Bolshevik Revolution” and its communist “Red Army” ethnically cleansed and killed at least 7 million Germans and millions more white Christians across all of Eastern Europe. They raped at least 2 million German women and millions more Eastern European women. 7 million Christians were enslaved and killed in the Ukraine Holodomor. The Red army enslaved Eastern Europe for almost half of a century.

Who was the founder of the Bolshevik Red Army? None other than Leon Trotsky (real name: Lev Bronstein), who is listed as:

“One of the greatest Jewish Generals in History.” —Jewish Encyclopedia, 1943 vol. 10, pg. 312.

Trotsky oversaw the murder of millions of Christian Russians.

In fact, 5 of the 6 Bolshevik Red Army leaders were Jewish, including Lenin, Trotsky, Zinoview, Kamenov, and Sverdlov. All of these men spoke Yiddish.

“The Bolsheviks were led by non-Russians who hated the Russian people!” —Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Russian dissident and Nobel Peace Prize winner – from when the award was actually given for peace.

Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s book entitled “The Gulag Archipelago”, written between 1958 and 1968, was only seen distributed in “samizdat” or underground publication in the Soviet Union until it was allowed to be published there in 1989, and is now required reading in Russian schools, as a sense of nationalism is now with the New Russia. The word “archipelago”, the Greek word for a cluster or chain of islands, compares the system of labor camps spread across the Soviet Union as a vast “chain of islands”, known only to those who were fated to visit them. The book goes against the myth that the forced labor camps in Russia were Stalin’s brainchild, and shows that Lenin was the instigator of this vast system of slave labor gulag camps in the pre-Stalin era, for which Stalin re-vamped later on.

Perhaps this is why outspoken Americans like me are so fearful of the vast prison system in America, including our WW2 prison camps left over from when we imprisoned anyone of Japanese origin, and the newer Halliburton/KBR no-bid contracted FEMA prison camps being built throughout the land. Old Dick Cheney is the kingpin of the private prison business… talk about a candidate for a Red Army general!!!

“The Gulag Archipelago” also exposes the six administrators of this “island chain of labor camps”, the greatest killing machine in all of history, which include Aron Solts, Yakov Rappoport, Lazar Kogan, Matvei Berman, Genrikh Yagoda, and Naftaly Frenkel. None of these men were Russian in ethnicity, but were in fact Zionist Jews.

Now, understand that Zionism predates the 1900’s. The First Zionist Congress was held in Basel, Switzerland in 1897, and has roots way before this time. And we must remember, Zionists did not have a state of their own until they violently took over Palestine when the United Nations voted for the creation of it on May 14th, 1948. It is ironic and sad that this would become the new Jewish Zionist “Independence day”. I wonder what the Palestinians who lost their independence on that day must call it?

(headline) “Stalin’s army of rapists: The brutal war crime that Russia and Germany tried to ignore” (Article) “As well as the estimated two million rapes in Germany, there were between 70,000 and 100,000 in Vienna and anywhere from 50,000 to 200,000 in Hungary, as well as thousands in Romania and Bulgaria, which had been pro-Nazi, but also in Poland, Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia, which had not been.”   —Mail Online, October 24th, 2008, describing new controversial movie “A woman in Berlin”.

“Indeed, as Beevor points out, the Red Army even raped Russian women who had been liberated from concentration camps, emaciated and wearing their prison uniform… Overall, however, Russian soldiers tended to prefer plumper and better-fed women, and one diarist recorded the satisfaction felt by some Berlin women that these tended to be the wives of Nazi Party functionaries… Vodka played a role, of course, but the worst of the behavior was fueled by sheer hatred and aggression, as well as a cold-hearted sense of deterrence for the future.”   —Mail Online article, October 24th, 2008, “Stalin’s army of rapists…”

“They do not speak a word of Russian, but that makes it easier… You don’t have to persuade them. You just point a revolver and tell them to lie down. Then you do your stuff and go away.” —Russian Red Army soldier, written in a letter sent to his home, dated February 1945. It was unusual for Red Army soldiers to admit to rape in letters home, -Mail Online, October 24th, 2008, “Stalin’s army of rapists…”

“In the house next to ours, Soviet troops went in and pulled the women on to the street, had their mattresses pulled out and raped the women… The men had to watch, and then the men were shot. Right at the end of the street, a woman was tied to a wagon wheel and terribly misused. Of course, you had the feeling that you wanted to stop it, but there was no possibility to do that.’ Women going to and from work past Red Army pickets were routinely raped.” —John Noble, local inhabitant of Dresden, post war interview in 1945, Mail Online, October 24th, 2008, “Stalin’s army of rapists…”

“Weeks before you entered this house, its tenants were living in constant fright and fear… By day and by night, plundering Russian soldiers went in and out, raping my sisters before their own parents and children, beating up my old parents. All furniture, wardrobes and trunks were smashed with bayonets and rifle butts, their contents soiled and destroyed in an indescribable manner.” Hans-Dietrich Muller Grote, wealthy German publisher, writing to President Truman about the place he stayed in during the Potsdam conference of July 1945. -Mail Online, October 24th, 2008, “Stalin’s army of rapists…”

I dare say that most of these acts were shamefully and successfully blamed on the German peoples as part of the “Jewish holocaust”. Perhaps this is the shameful alternative hidden history that “holocaust denial” stems from?

“Women, mothers, and their children lie to the right and left along the route and in front of each of them stands a raucous armada of men with their trousers down. The women, who were bleeding or losing consciousness, get shoved to one side, and our men shoot the ones who try to save their children. A group of ‘grinning’ officers ensured that ‘every soldier without exception would take part. Richard Evans, Professor of Modern History at Cambridge, quoting a young Russian officer recalling how his unit overtook a column of fleeing German refugees. -Mail Online, October 24th, 2008, “Stalin’s army of rapists…”

“Rape was often accompanied by torture and mutilation and frequently ends in the victim being shot or bludgeoned to death. The raging violence was undiscriminating. The insistence on the men watching the rapes was deliberate policy, intended ‘to underline the humiliation. Underlying all this foul inhumanity was the way the German Army and its allies had behaved during its invasion of Russia. That was clearly not the only explanation  –  it doesn’t explain why the Red Army raped Poles, Czechs and Yugoslavs and even Russian women, for example  –  for that one has to delve deep into the darkest recesses of the male psyche. Yet the four years of life-and-death conflict did brutalize the Soviet peasant-soldier and taught him to behave like a beast against the women of his enemies once he was given the chance. The Soviet-German war lasted 1,418 days without respite, and for sheer horror there is nothing to equal it in the long and monstrous annals of human warfare.”Richard Evans, Professor of Modern History at Cambridge, from his book, -Mail Online, October 24th, 2008, “Stalin’s army of rapists…”

“The only two non Jews in the communist conspiracy were Chambers and Hiss. Every other one was a Jew and it raised hell with us.” President Richard Nixon, 1971, White House tapes released by the National Archives in 1999, I.E. Whittaker Chambers and Alger Hiss, Reference in N.Y. Times, Oct. 7, 1999 and Newsweek, Oct. 18, 1999, p. 30)

“There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of the Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews” —Winston Churchill

“Lenin was a Jew by the standards of Israel’s Law of Return: he possessed a Jewish grandparent. It would seem that not only was Lenin a Jew, but that he was a Jewish racist and chauvinist, although he kept his ideas on this volatile subject far in the background, probably because they were in radical conflict with the supposed universalism of Marxism. …Lenin was a Jewish racist who deliberately gave Jews especially, the most ‘intellectually demanding tasks.’ He admitted that 50% of the communist terrorist vanguard in the south and west of Russia was comprised of Jews.” —Researcher Wayne McGuire of Harvard University


“We are exterminating the bourgeoisie as a class.” —Lenin

“The interests of the revolution require the physical annihilation of the bourgeoisie class.” —Apfelbaum (Zinoviev)

“The longer the rotten bourgeoisie society lives, the more and more barbaric will anti-Semitism become everywhere.”   —Leon Trotsky, New York Daily Forward, a Jewish newspaper, interview in 1937.

“Without mercy, without sparing, we will kill our enemies in scores of hundreds. Let them be thousands; let them drown themselves in their own blood. For the blood of Lenin and Uritzky, Zinoviev and Vólodarsky, let there be floods of the blood of the bourgeoisie–more blood! As much as possible!” —top Communist Jewish official Zinoviev, Krasnaya Gazeta, Sept. 1, 1918.


Who was this bourgeoisie class?

“Bourgeoisie was a Bolshevik code-word for Gentile. The first law passed after the Communists seized power in Russia made anti-Semitism a crime punishable by death.” —Izvestia, July 27, 1918.

And finally, we get to a true source of pure evil – Zionist Jew and Communist leader, Elya Ehrenburg.

“If your part of the front is quiet and there is no fighting, then kill a German in the meantime… If you have already killed a German, then kill another one – there is nothing more amusing to us than a heap of German corpses.” —Elya Ehrenburg

“Kill! Kill! In the German race there is nothing but evil; not one among the living, but one among the yet unborn but is evil!” —Elya Ehrenburg

“Use force and break the racial pride of these German women. Take them as your lawful booty. Kill! As you storm onward, kill, you gallant soldiers of the Red Army.” —Elya Ehrenburg

“Ilya Ehrenburg: A True Jewish Hero of the Second World War” —headline, Jewish News

“PM: Israel to Erect Red Army Memorial” —Jerusalem Post, February 16, 2010, Headline, Prime Minister Netanyahu honoring Bolshevik Red Army under the guise of its “crucial role in the victory over the Nazis.

From its earliest days, Zionist Jewish international bankers supported and financed the Bolshevik Red Army:

Financier capitalist Jacob Schiff, head of Goldman Sachs, personally gave 17 million dollars to the Bolchevik cause throughout these brutal years.

If you get anything out of this “real holocaust” section, I can only hope that it is this: Our boys in uniform are in the same exact position now in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and soon to be Iran and Egypt as these Russian Red Army soldiers were for the first half of last century. They are being led by the Zionist and Zionist friendly regime that has taken over our country and our military. As history repeatedly shows, this means that otherwise good and moral virtuous men can and will be pressured and ordered into doing things that they would otherwise never do, in a foreign country with no rules or fear of war crimes, since no war is officially declared against any country by the United States. Thus, the raping, torture, and murder of millions of innocent Arab men, women, and children is happening now, right now, under the former pro-Zionist Israel Bush and new pro-Zionist Israel Obama regimes, by our manipulated soldiers. The American and coalition forces, whether you like it or not, have become the new Red Army. The suicide rate among our soldiers alone who cannot face the horrors of their acts against innocents should be sufficient enough to prove this. As hard as this is to stomach, it is the truth. And Americans are now in the same position as Eastern Europe was so long ago… We can continue to let it happen and try to forget it later, though perpetual war against the unknown and indistinguishable “terrorists” will always be the Zionist goal, or we can come together and stop the Zionist controllers and bankers now – and possibly salvage our hope, our respect, our dignity, and our pride. And maybe we can even save our country and the principles for which it was founded from the dark annals of our history.

“Nowdays an anti-Semite is someone hated by Jews” —Dr. Hajo Meyer, holocaust “survivor”, Auschwitz camp. Dr. Meyer is also ridiculously called an anti-Semite by the Zionists, despite the fact that he is a Jew and former Nazi labor camp prisoner.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

A short world history of Jewish expulsion:

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Just in Europe and Russia alone, the (Khazarian) Zionist Jews have been banished over 47 times in the last 1000 years (not including this last century):

Mainz, 1012 – France, 1182 – Upper Bavaria, 1276 – England, 1290 – France, 1306 – France, 1322 – Saxony, 1349 – Hungary, 1360 – Belgium, 1370 – Slovakia, 1380 – France, 1394 – Austria, 1420 – Lyons, 1420 – Cologne, 1424 – Mainz, 1438 – Augsburg, 1438 – Upper Bavaria, 1442 – Netherlands, 1444 – Brandenburg, 1446 – Mainz, 1462 – Mainz, 1483 – Warsaw, 1483 – Spain, 1492 – Italy, 1492 - Lithuania, 1495 – Portugal, 1496 – Naples, 1496 – Navarre, 1498 – Nuremberg, 1498 – Brandenburg, 1510 – Prussia, 1510 – Genoa, 1515 – Naples, 1533 – Italy, 1540 – Naples, 1541 – Prague, 1541 – Genoa, 1550 – Bavaria, 1551 – Prague, 1557 – Papal States, 1569 – Hungary, 1582 – Hamburg, 1649 – Vienna, 1669 – Slovakia, 1744 –  Moravia, 1744 – Bohemia, 1744 – Moscow, 1891. —Excerpted from “The Synagogue of Satan” by Andrew Carrington Hitchcock. This was not the end, as we all know recent history.

“It can hardly be an accident that antagonism directed against the Jews is to be found pretty much everywhere in the world where Jews and non-Jews are associated. And as the Jews are the common element of the situation it would seem probable, on the face of it, that the cause will be found in them rather than in the widely varying groups which feel this antagonism.Professor Jesse H. Holmes, writing in “The American Hebrew”.

If this hostility, even aversion, had only been shown towards the Jews at one period and in one country, it would be easy to unravel the limited causes of this anger, but this race has been on the contrary an object of hatred to all the peoples among whom it has established itself. It must be therefore, since the enemies of the Jews belonged to the most diverse races, since they lived in countries very distant from each other; since they were ruled by very different laws, governed by opposite principles, since they had neither the same morals, nor the same customs, since they were animated by unlike dispositions which did not permit them to judge of anything in the same way, it must be therefore that the general cause of anti-Semitism has always resided in Israel itself and not in those who have fought against Israel.—Bernard Lazare, noted Jewish author, from his book “L’antisemitisme son histoire et ses causes”, published in 1894, regarding the history of the expulsions of Jews from so many cultures.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

And then there was that bastard, Hitler…?

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

“40,000 Roar Protest Here Against Hitler” —front page headline, New York Daily News, with the picture of a massive anti-German protest rally held in Madison Square Garden on March 27, 1933.

“Judea Declairs War On Germany, Jews Of All The World Unite” – “Boycott Of German Goods” – “Mass Demonstrations In Many Districts” – “Dramatic Action”  front page headline and column headlines, London Daily Express, March 24, 1933.

“The whole of Israel throughout the world is uniting to declare an economic and financial war on Germany. The appearance of the Swastika as the symbol of the new Germany has revived the old war symbol of Judas to new life. Fourteen million Jews scattered over the entire world are tied to each other as if one man, in order to declare war against the German persecutors of their fellow believers. The Jewish wholesaler will quit his house, the banker his stock exchange, the merchant his business, and the beggar his humble hut, in order to join the holy war against Hitler’s people… (Germany is) now confronted with an international boycott of its trade, its finances, and its industry…. In London, New York, Paris and Warsaw, Jewish businessmen are united to go on an economic crusade… worldwide preparations are being made to organize protest demonstrations,” and reported that “the old and reunited nation of Israel gets in formation with new and modern weapons to fight out its age old battle against its persecutors.”   —London Daily Express, March 24, 1933.

Similar rallies and protest marches were also being held in other cities during the same time frame. The intensity of the Jewish campaign against Germany was such that the Hitler government vowed that if the campaign did not stop, there would be a one-day boycott in Germany of Jewish-owned stores. Despite this, the hate campaign continued, forcing Germany to take defensive measures that created a situation wherein the Jews of Germany became increasingly and marginalized. The truth about the Jewish war on Germany has been suppressed by most histories of the period.

“Germans! Defend yourselves! Don’t shop at Jewish stores!” —sign held by protester after the Zionist Jews declared a world-wide boycott on Germany. Defense and offense are two different concepts.

I wish to confirm, in the most explicit manner, the declarations which I and my colleagues have made during the last month, and especially in the last week, that the Jews stand by Great Britain and will fight on the side of the democracies. Our urgent desire is to give effect to these declarations [against Germany]. We wish to do so in a way entirely consonant with the general scheme of British action, and therefore would place ourselves, in matters big and small, under the coordinating direction of His Majesty’s Government. The Jewish Agency is ready to enter into immediate arrangements for utilizing Jewish manpower, technical ability, resources, etc.”   Chaim Weizmann, president of both the international “Jewish Agency” and of the World Zionist Organization (and later Israel’s first president), written to British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain in a letter published in The London Times, September 6, 1939.

As a consequence of this formal declaration of war, the German authorities thus deemed Jews to be potential enemy agents. This would be like Mexico declaring war on America today, and America’s reaction would be to stop ignoring the millions of illegal aliens in its borders, and to stop employing their labor and patronizing their shops…

“In connection with the Jewish question I have this to say: it is a shameful spectacle to see how the whole democratic world is oozing sympathy for the poor tormented Jewish people, but remains hard-hearted and obdurate when it comes to helping them – which is surely, in view of its attitude, an obvious duty. The arguments that are brought up as an excuse for not helping them actually speak for us Germans and Italians. For this is what they say: (1) “We,” that is the democracies, “are not in a position to take in the Jews.” Yet in these empires there are not even 10 people to the square kilometer. While Germany, with her 135 inhabitants to the square kilometer, is supposed to have room for them! (2) They assure us: We cannot take them unless Germany is prepared to allow them a certain amount of capital to bring with them as immigrants. For hundreds of years Germany was good enough to receive these elements, although they possessed nothing except infectious political and physical diseases. What they possess today, they have by a very large extent gained at the cost of the less astute German nation by the most reprehensible manipulations.Today we are merely paying this people what it deserves. When the German nation was, thanks to the inflation instigated and carried through by Jews, deprived of the entire savings which it had accumulated in years of honest work, when the rest of the world took away the German nation’s foreign investments, when we were divested of the whole of our colonial possessions, these philanthropic considerations evidently carried little noticeable weight with democratic statesmen.” —Adolf Hitler, January 30, 1939, in a speech at the Reichtag.

When you take the Zionist Hollywood persona out, and add the Bolshevic history and historical Jewish expulsion and world-wide boycott of Germany years before WW2, Adolf Hitler, the real man, suddenly begins to sound a lot like modern Americans complaining about illegal immigration, now doesn’t he?

- The following is an excerpt from “The Jewish Declaration of War on Nazi Germany – The Economic Boycott of 1933″, from The Barnes Review, by M. Raphael Johnson, Ph.D…

To the Zionist leaders, Hitler’s assumption of power held out the possibility of a flow of Jewish immigrants to Palestine. Previously, the majority of German Jews, who identified themselves as Germans, had little sympathy with the Zionist cause of promoting the ingathering of world Jewry to Palestine. But the Zionists saw that only the anti-Semitic Hitler was likely to push the anti-Zionist German Jews into the arms of Zionism.

For all the modern-day wailing by worldwide supporters of Israel (not to mention the Israelis themselves) about “the Holocaust”, they neglect to mention that making the situation in Germany as uncomfortable for the Jews as possible – in cooperation with German National Socialism – was part of the plan.

Note to readers of this article who can also read German: a booklet discussing the emigration of Jews from Third Reich Germany, and the Transfer Agreement that facilitated their emigration, may be found here!

This was the genesis of the so-called Transfer Agreement, the agreement between Zionist Jews and the National Socialist government to transfer German Jewry to Palestine.

According to Jewish historian Walter Laqueur and many others, German Jews were far from convinced that immigration to Palestine was the answer. Furthermore, although the majority of German Jews refused to consider the Zionists as their political leaders, it is clear that Hitler protected and cooperated with the Zionists for the purposes of implementing the final solution: the mass transfer of Jews to the Middle East.

Edwin Black, in his massive tome The Transfer Agreement (Macmillan, 1984), stated that although most Jews did not want to flee to Palestine at all, due to the Zionist movement’s influence within Nazi Germany a Jew’s best chance of getting out of Germany was by emigrating to Palestine. In other words, the Transfer Agreement itself mandated that Jewish capital (money) could only to go Palestine.

Thus, according to the Zionists, a Jew could leave Germany only if he went to the Levant (Eastern Mediterranean/Palestine area).

It was one thing for the Zionists to subvert the anti-Nazi boycott. Zionism needed to transfer out the capital of German Jews, and merchandise was the only available medium. But soon Zionist leaders understood that the success of the future Jewish Palestinian economy would be inextricably bound up with the survival of the Nazi economy. So the Zionist leadership was compelled to go further. The German economy would have to be safeguarded, stabilized, and if necessary reinforced. Hence, the Nazi party and the Zionist organizers shared a common stake in the recovery of Germany….

The result was the understanding that Zionism would have to ally itself with National Socialism, so that the German government would not impede the flow of Jewish capital out of the country.

It served the Zionist interests at the time that Jews be loud in their denunciations of German practices against the Jews to scare them into the Levant, but, on the other hand, Laqueur states that “The Zionists became motivated not to jeopardize the German economy or currency.” In other words, the Zionist leadership of the Jewish Diaspora was one of subterfuge and underhandedness, with only the advent of German hostility towards Jewry convincing the world’s Jews that immigration was the only escape.

The fact is that the ultimate establishment of the state of Israel was based on fraud. The Zionists did not represent anything more than a small minority of German Jews in 1933.

On the one hand, the Zionist fathers of Israel wanted loud denunciations of Germany’s “cruelties” to the world’s Jews while at the same time demanding moderation so that the National Socialist government would remain stable, financially and politically. Thus Zionism boycotted the (1933) boycott.

For all intents and purposes, the National Socialist government was the best thing to happen to Zionism in its history, for it “proved” to many Jews that Europeans were irredeemably anti-Jewish and that Palestine was the only answer: Zionism came to represent the overwhelming majority of Jews solely by trickery and cooperation with Adolf Hitler.

For the Zionists, both the denunciations of German policies towards Jews (to keep Jews frightened), plus the reinvigoration of the German economy (for the sake of final resettlement) was imperative for the Zionist movement. Ironically, today the Zionist leaders of Israel complain bitterly about the horrific and inhuman regime of the National Socialists. So the fraud continues.

–End Excerpt

And this if anything, shows the difference between the Jew and the Zionist.

And with the disclaimer that Germany and Hitler were not innocent in any way of the atrocities of war, and that this is in no way trying to portray Hitler in a heroic or positive light, only a truthful one, the real atrocities under Zionist Jewish control in the Bolshevik Revolution and Red Army, which in reality continue today with the attempted ethnic cleansing of Palestine, Iraq, and all Arab countries, as well as a constant attack on white Europeans, far outweighs Germany’s efforts. And there were not anywhere close to the 6 million Jews quoted in the ridiculous Zionist holocaust propaganda in and around Germany, with way less than 1 million living in Germany, of which more than half were exported out to other countries and the new Israel.

So in a nutshell… With the German economy already in shambles from the first World War, the world-wide Jewish Zionist population first declared a total economic boycott on Germany in 1933 to hurt its economic stability and growth even more, and then declared all out war on Germany in 1939 by joining with Great Britain, all the while pumping misinformation and blatant propaganda about the country. While the Jews in Germany were German citizens, who identified as being German and anti-Zionist, the Zionist agenda to start the Jewish Zionist state of Israel by taking over Palestine through United Nations decree, purposefully made it so that Germany could no longer trust the Jews living in Germany since the world-wide Jewish population were now at war with Germany, in order to force Germany to export its Jews to Palestine (the new Israel). Since Jews were prominent businessmen in Germany, and the exportation of these Jewish Germans would cause even more economic monetary upheaval in Germany, not to mention the fact that they didn’t want to leave, Hitler decided to not agree to the Zionist terms to force Germany to allow the Jews to leave with all of the German wealth they had acquired. (Imagine if all the Jewish business owners of America wanted to pick up and leave all of a sudden with all of their assets and American money, and what would happen to America’s economy… to really comprehend this and its consequences, see the last section of this essay on the boycott of Zionist owned companies – America would be in economic shambles far worse than Germany). And so, the Zionists entered into an unholy alliance (the Transfer Agreement above) with Hitler’s National Socialist Party to allow Jews to be exported from Germany, all the while still spreading horrific propaganda about Hitler, his army, and the people of Germany. And when all was said and done, and the surrender of Germany was complete, the stories of Jewish holocaust and extermination were forced onto the world, hiding the true history of the Zionist lead Bolshevik Red Army’s horrific war crimes and labor camps from the annals of true world history. And ever since, most white-European countries have been conned into paying “reparations” to Israel in the form of billions and billions of dollars, as well as supplying weapons, and Israel could not support itself or its ethnic cleansing efforts without these.

This is the Zionist group we are dealing with today – inside of our own country, economy, and government.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

But what about the Nazi death camps?

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

As far as the prison/forced labor camps that have been deemed “Nazi Death camps”… let’s have a look at the most notoriously lied about camp in Zionist holocaust history, named Auschwitz:

This is a factual list of some of the facilities available to prisoners at the alleged Nazi death camp of Auschwitz in Poland. Most of these facilities can still be seen in the camp today, including the cinema, swimming pool, hospital, library and post office…

Camp complaints office – where inmates could register complaints or make suggestions. Camp Commander Hoess had a standing order that any inmate could approach him personally to register a complaint about other inmates such as “Kapos” and even guards.

Auschwitz maternity ward – Over 3,000 live births were registered here, with not a single infant death while Auschwitz was in operation under German rule – and had a child care center where working mothers could leave their children.

*I’m sorry… but the disconnect between killing Jews and then rearing and caring for their babies with such finesse doesn’t really make sense to me. How about you?

Camp kitchen – one of the largest service buildings in Auschwitz, with state-of-the-art cooking facilities. There were twelve of these throughout the camp.

* The caloric content of the diet was carefully monitored by camp and Red Cross delegates. These only deteriorated in Auschwitz and other camps towards the end of the war when German railroads and the entire transport system collapsed under constant allied aerial attacks – Germans kept meticulous records of everything.

Red Cross death records at Auschwitz - show prisoner deaths mostly from disease like Typhoid and of old age: http://www.air-photo.com/english/deathbooks.html

Saunas (with small ovens) and gyms- for delousing clothing, as lice carried Typhus (Typhoid fever): http://www.air-photo.com/english/sauna.html

Major French Magazine Acknowledges Auschwitz Gas Chamber Fraud: http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v15/v15n1p23_Weber.html

Interview with Dr. Franciszek Piper, Director of Auschwitz State Museum: http://www.codoh.com/gcgv/gcgvcole.html

The Auschwitz State Museum has recently revised its half-century-old claim that 4 million humans were murdered in the Auschwitz camp. They now claim that maybe around 1 million were murdered. And to offer proof of this claim… the museum has nothing! Yet the museum displays disturbing piles of hair, boots, eyeglasses, and other items of clothing and personal possessions from supposedly murdered prisoners. As propaganda these are admittedly effective tools. However, as evidence of murder, they are ridiculous.

The following is taken from the Institute For Historical Review, and can be seen here: http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/holohoax.htm

–Begin Exerpt–

Fred A. Leuchter is America’s leading specialist on the design and fabrication of execution equipment, including homicidal gas chambers. In 1988, Leuchter scraped samples from the alleged gas chamber walls in Auschwitz, Birkenau and Lublin. Cyanide residue would be clearly evident on all these walls if gassings did occur. To his astonishment, Leuchter found no significant cyanide traces in any one of these rooms.

In 1991, the Polish government repeated these tests to disprove Leuchter’s findings, but they as well found no evidence of any gassings ever occurring.

The structural integrity of these “gas chambers” is also extremely faulty. These rooms have ordinary doors and windows which are not hermetically sealed! There are large gaps between the floors and doors. If the Germans had attempted to gas anyone in these rooms, they would have died themselves, as the gas would have leaked and contaminated the entire area. Also, no equipment exists to exhaust the air-gas mixture from these buildings. Nothing was made to introduce or distribute the gas throughout the chambers. There are no provisions to prevent condensation of gas on the walls, floors or ceilings. No exhaust stacks have ever existed.

Though six million Jews supposedly died in the gas chambers, not one body has ever been autopsied and found to have died of gas poisoning.

We have been shown piles of bodies from World War II, but most of these persons died of typhus or starvation (according to Red Cross records) or Allied bombings and a great many of those were murdered Germans, not Jews. Roughly the equivalent of ten football fields should be packed full of gassed bodies to present as evidence, yet not one body has ever been discovered.

The Germans documented everything in meticulous detail from shrubbery to arbors, but no pre-war or wartime plans or documents exist that detail or even mention any gas chambers for reasons of genocide. All documents ever presented were drawn up AFTER the war.

Even if we threw away all the evidence and accounted for every so-called gas chamber, it would have taken 68 YEARS to accomplish gassing six million Jews!

Even “The Diary of Anne Frank” is a hoax. Portions of the diary were written with a ball point pen. These pens were not in use at the time Anne Frank lived…

There are compelling reasons to believe that the so-called holocaust never existed. Page 223, in “The Diary of Anne Frank”, (Pan Horizons edition, Pan Books Ltd., London, 1989), indicates that the size of Auschwitz, the most notorious of all German work camps, WAS VERY SMALL, with only 11,000 people (many of whom may not even have been Jews) being evacuated by the Germans at the time of the Russian advance in 1945. Certainly, compared to Spielberg’s film, Schindler’s List (which Emilie Schindler, Oskar’s widow, said was full of lies), and other Jewish propaganda, that millions upon millions of Jews were systematically exterminated, 11,000 people is a very small number. Simple arithmetic tells us that the Germans would have had to have had hundreds of camps, or else they would have had to exterminate 137 people PER HOUR, in order for six million Jews to have been exterminated at such small camps as Auschwitz, a feat that would have been humanly impossible considering that, according to Douglas Reed’s “Behind the Scene and The Controversy of Zion”, a mere 850,000 soldiers and others were killed by the entire German and Japanese war machines combined during WW2 (see p.397-400 of Douglas Reed’s book Controversy of Zion). People who would believe the Jewish propaganda that six million Jews were exterminated by Hitler must KEEP IN MIND THE SMALL SCALE CONSTRUCTION OF AUSCHWITZ AND THE VERY FEW OTHER GERMAN WORK CAMPS THAT EXISTED DURING WW2.

On July 13, 1994, a documentary on the life of Charles A. Lindbergh broadcast on the Public Broadcast System (PBS – KENW-TV) said that when Lindbergh visited one of these few camps in Germany following WW2, he was told that 25,000 died in 1-1/2 years. Again, simple arithmetic tells us that 25,000 times a half dozen camps does not equal 6,000,000. In fact, it doesn’t even equal 600,000…

It is an interesting fact that the number of so-called persecuted Jews KEEPS INCREASING. Hal Greenwald, program director for the Hillel Foundation at Duke University, a Jewish student group, has been promoting the idea that “NINE MILLION JEWS WERE EXTERMINATED IN HITLER’S GAS CHAMBERS” (New York Times, Nov. 9, 1991, AP). NOW IT’S 9 MILLION AND GROWING… JUST LIKE OUR DEBT/TAX MONEY SUPPLY…THE NUMBERS JUST KEEP COMING OUT OF THIN AIR…

It is not denied concentration camps existed. Tragically, many died of typhus or starvation, as often happens in such situations. There is, however, no evidence that any gassings occurred for the reasons of genocide.

–End Exerpt–

If the holocaust story is true, why have the Zionist Jews enacted laws against “holocaust denial” around the world, and why are people arrested and imprisoned for questioning the holocaust in almost every country?  http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1226673/British-bishop-Richard-Williamson-trial-Germany-Holocaust-denial.html

Imagine if there was laws against “9/11 denial” and it was against the law for us in groups like “We Are Change” to protest and hold up signs or banners, or to even discuss 9/11.

All I can say is that if I had a labor camp that was building and supplying my war effort, I would not be killing my laborers and treating them poorly as is portrayed in the Hollywood holocaust. History is continuously showing that the Hollywood portrayal of slaves in ancient civilization such as Egypt, where slaves built the pyramids, has been completely misrepresented. In actuality, the Pharaohs provided many amenities and services to their slaves like oils, bountiful foodstuffs, and more than adequate shelter. It just doesn’t make sense to commit genocide against the people you absolutely need, nor does it make sense that the Germans would arbitrarily kill the Jews, at the same time that they were in an agreement with Zionist world-Judaism to export them. And finally, America didn’t rush in to save anyone else during the Bolshevik revolution, so why the sudden change of heart for the “poor suffering Jews” in Germany?

I can only hope that those reading or listening to this can think for themselves, and haven’t been so dumbed down that the truth is not attainable through logic and reason… and proof !!!

This is an essay about the American prison and labor camps which were set up for German prisoners by the USA, the French, etc… It is an accounting by a young American soldier who stood guard at these camps which housed German farmers and citizens. They were in open fields with no shelter surrounded by barb wire. They were starved, slept in the mud, and shot for “target practice”. The victorious always become the tyrants, even us. (or in my opinion, especially us.) These atrocities are human, and not race driven. Power corrupts anyone, even against their will, and we obey orders or face punishment… kinda like why we still pay taxes! This essay was published in The Journal of Historical Review, Summer 1990 (Vol. 10, No. 2), pp. 161-166. (Revised, updated: Nov. 2008). Please read: http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v10/v10p161_Brech.html.

“Americans had over 200 “concentration camps” after WW2 for German soldiers and people:” http://rense.com/general85/eis.htm

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Zionist Origins…

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

“As I show in my books, the campaign to impose a Rothschild fiefdom in Palestine goes back at least to the earlier part of the 19th century and probably long before. It was given a massive boost with the Balfour Declaration in 1917 when the British Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour declared in a letter his government’s support for a Jewish homeland in Palestine… This letter was sent by Balfour, an inner-circle member of an elite secret society called the Round Table, to Baron (Walter) Rothschild who funded the Round Table… Today, Rothschild Illuminati fronts like the Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg Group, Royal Institute of International Affairs, and others, still answer to the Round Table which string-pulls and coordinates from the shadows. This is why Zionists in government are invariably connected with these Rothschild-controlled organizations… The Rothschilds funded the early settlers from Europe to relocate in post-war Palestine and they also funded and armed the terrorist groups, like Irgun, which bombed and terrorized Israel into existence in 1948, a campaign which forced 800,000 Palestinians to leave the land of their birth… Israel is simply the State of Rothschild and how appropriate that they (Rothschilds) paid for the construction of the Israeli parliament building, the Knesset, and the Israel Supreme Court. The name Rothschild means Red-shield and it originates with the red shield ‘Star of David’ symbol (not a Jewish symbol before the Rothschilds) which they displayed on their house in Frankfurt… The very flag of Israel tells you who owns it. There are many reasons why the Rothschilds and their allies wanted to hijack Palestine and one was to keep the Middle East in a state of disruption and turmoil from which a global war can eventually be triggered to usher in the New World Order of world government dictatorship.” —David Icke, from his essay “The Zionist Elephant In The Room”, June 14, 2009

And yes, The New World Order is a term uttered thousands of times by all U.S. Presidents, including Obama (who’s real name, by the way, is Barry Soetoro – http://educate-yourself.org/cn/orlytaitzletter24feb09.shtml). Do not let these terms which have been downplayed and made to seem ridiculous in the Zionist controlled media stop you from comprehending the message of this writing. The New World Order is here, now! For proof of this, here is a great documentary – top on my list in fact – that I highly recommend you watch after you read this, which will make your head absolutely spin…

“Invisible Empire”, by Jason Bermis – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NO24XmP1c5E&feature=fvw

” …the last time I checked, Jews made up only 2% of the total U.S. population, and only 1.2% of Canada’s total population, barely 1% of France’s population, and a mere 0.5% & 0.45% of the U.K & Australian populations respectively. And for a greater understanding, consider that of the 13,000,000 or so Jews living on this planet, only 200,000 of them claim to be Chabad-Lubavitchers! So, what of this Jewish Supremacist Movement, the Chabad … this racist, merciless group of men who clasp the hand of “Democratically-elected” Western leaders with their right hand, whilst their left hand launches deceptive Telethon’s & “charities” in order to extract yet more money from U.S citizens for Israel’s continued slaughter of innocent women and children in Palestine – (Is 6 billion per annum in U.S. tax-payer dollars not enough, Oh Israel?!)” —Amalek, Radio Islam, Jewish Manipulation of  (non-Jewish goy) World Leaders.


“The only two non-Jews in the communist conspiracy were Chambers and Hiss. Every other one was a Jew and it raised hell with us.” President Richard Nixon, 1971, White House tapes, released by the National Archives in 1999, I.E. Whittaker Chambers and Alger Hiss, Reference in N.Y. Times, Oct. 7, 1999 and Newsweek, Oct. 18, 1999, p. 30)

And speaking of presidents, click here for some quite telling pictures – http://www.radioislam.org/jewish-photos/manipulat-the-wold/world-leaders-manipulated.htm

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

The Jewish Soap Myth

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Zionist Jews have been spreading lies about soap being made from Jewish human remains since WW2. But several sources have disproved this myth, and it has never been proven.

–Exerpt

“The owner of a Montreal collectibles shop is defending his decision to sell a bar of soap he advertises as being made of the fat of Holocaust victims.

Jewish groups in Montreal are denouncing the shop in the city’s Plateau-Mont-Royal neighbourhood where the beige bar of soap is displayed.

The soap is inscribed with a swastika and displayed in a glass case with a card that says “Poland 1940.”

On Friday, Abraham Botines, a Spanish-born Jew who has operated the quirky boutique since 1967, admitted he has no idea whether the soap is really made of human remains.”

–End Exerpt

“A lab analysis of a swastika-stamped bar of soap said to be made from Holocaust victims shows no human remains.It’s just a regular bar of soap,” Montreal Police Inspector Paul Chablo told the Canadian Press.” —Jewish Journal, “Montreal police: Soap not made from human remains“, June 3, 2010.

What needs to be understood about cases like these is that the myth and perpetual lie about the plight of the Jews in Nazi Germany will be carried on in the hearts of men, despite the fact that once again the myth was proven to be false. And besides, why would anyone want to take a bath with soap made from human remains. Come on, we have got to think about these things logically…

Similar charges were found to be a hoax as well in World War 1, and for the most part, holocaust historians both Jewish and other have had to grudgingly conceed to the soap rumor as just a story.

Also, for some strange reason, humans like to collect things like war memorabilia. Many collectors of the Nazi era have never run across Human soap, and say begrudgingly that it is an urban legend.

Now who could have started a legend like that…?

The following is part of the Institute For Historical Review, entitled “Jewish Soap”, by Mark Weber.

–Begin Exerpt

“Wartime rumors that the Germans were manufacturing soap from the corpses of slaughtered Jews were based in part on the fact that soap bars distributed by German authorities in Jewish ghettos and camps bore the impressed initials “RIF,” which many took to stand for “Rein juedisches Fett” or “Pure Jewish Fat.” (It did not seem to matter that the letters were “RIF” and not “RJF.”) These rumors spread so widely in 1941 and 1942 that by late 1942 German authorities in Poland and Slovakia were expressing official concern about their impact.

According to a Polish source quoted in a secret wartime U.S. Army military intelligence report, for example, the Germans were operating a “human soap factory” in 1941 at Turek, Poland. “The Germans had brought thousands of Polish teachers, priests and Jews there and after extracting the blood serum from their bodies, had thrown them on large pots and melted off grease to make soap,” the intelligence report added.

Macabre “Jewish soap” jokes became popular in the ghettos and camps, and many non-Jews on the outside came to believe the story. When trains loaded with Jewish deportees stopped temporarily at rail stations, Poles reportedly would gleefully shout at them: “Jews to soap!” Even British prisoners of war interned at Auschwitz in 1944 testified later about the wartime rumors that corpses of gassing victims were being turned into soap there.

In spite of its inherently incredible character, the soap story became an important feature of Jewish and Allied war propaganda. Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, wartime head of both the World Jewish Congress and the American Jewish Congress, publicly charged in November 1942 that Jewish corpses were being “processed into such war-vital commodities as soap, fats and fertilizer” by the Germans. He further announced that the Germans were “even exhuming the dead for the value of the corpses,” and were paying fifty marks for each body.

In late 1942, the Congress Weekly, published by the American Jewish Congress, editorialized that the Germans were turning Jews “by scientific methods of dissolution into fertilizer, soap and glue.” An article in the same issue reported that Jewish deportees from France and Holland were being processed into “soap, glue and train oil” in at least two special factories in Germany. Typical of many other American periodicals, the influential New Republic reported in early 1943 that the Germans were “using the bodies of their Jewish victims to make soap and fertilizer in a factory at Siedlce.”

During June and July 1943, two prominent representatives of the Moscow-based “Jewish Anti-Fascist Committee” toured the United States and raised more than two million dollars for the Soviet war effort at a series of mass meetings. At each of these rallies, Soviet Jewish leader Solomon Mikhoels showed the crowd a bar of soap that he said was made from Jewish corpses…

In spite of all the apparently impressive evidence, the charge that the Germans manufactured soap from human beings is a falsehood, as Holocaust historians are now belatedly acknowledging. The “RIF” soap bar initials that supposedly stood for “Pure Jewish Fat” actually indicated nothing more sinister than “Reich Center for Industrial Fat Provisioning” (“Reichsstelle fr Industrielle Fettversorgung”), a German agency responsible for wartime production and distribution of soap and washing products. RIF soap was a poor quality substitute that contained no fat at all, human or otherwise.

Shortly after the war the public prosecutor’s office of Flensburg, Germany, began legal proceedings against Dr. Rudolf Spanner for his alleged role in producing human soap at the Danzig Institute. But after an investigation the charge was quietly dropped. In a January 1968 letter, the office stated that its inquiry had determined that no soap from human corpses was made at the Danzig Institute during the war.

More recently, Jewish historian Walter Laqueur “denied established history” by acknowledging in his 1980 book, The Terrible Secret, that the human soap story has no basis in reality. Gitta Sereny, another Jewish historian, noted in her book Into That Darkness: “The universally accepted story that the corpses were used to make soap and fertilizer is finally refuted by the generally very reliable Ludwigsburg Central Authority for Investigation into Nazi Crimes.”

Deborah Lipstadt, a professor of modern Jewish history, similarly “rewrote history” when she confirmed in 1981: “The fact is that the Nazis never used the bodies of Jews, or for that matter anyone else, for the production of soap.”

In April 1990, professor Yehuda Bauer of Israel’s Hebrew University, regarded as a leading Holocaust historian, as well as Shmuel Krakowski, archives director of Israel’s Yad Vashem Holocaust center, confirmed that the human soap story is not true. Camp inmates “were prepared to believe any horror stories about their persecutors,” Bauer said. At the same time, though, he had the chutzpah to blame the legend on “the Nazis.”

In fact, blame for the soap story lies rather with individuals such as Simon Wiesenthal and Stephen Wise, organizations like the World Jewish Congress, and the victorious Allied powers, none of whom has ever apologized for promoting this vile falsehood.

Why did Bauer and Krakowski decide that this was the appropriate time to officially abandon the soap story? Krakowski himself hints that a large part of the motivation for this “tactical retreat” has been to save what’s left of the sinking Holocaust ship by throwing overboard the most obvious falsehoods. In the face of the growing Revisionist challenge, easily demonstrable falsehoods like the soap story have become dangerous embarrassments because they raise doubts about the entire Holocaust legend. As Krakowski put it: “Historians have concluded that soap was not made from human fat. When so many people deny the Holocaust ever happened, why give them something to use against the truth?”

–End Exerpt

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

The Diary of Anne Frank… Really?

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

–Excerpt from “The Anne Frank Diary Fraud”, by Brian Harring, TBR News.org – ( ) = (my personal notes)

Propaganda, as a weapon of psychological warfare is in even wider use today. Communists were masters of the art…

Such has been the effect, if not the deliberate intention of many who have promoted its distribution, of a book of popular appeal-The Diary Of Anne Frank. It has been sold to the public as the actual diary of a young Jewish girl who died in a Nazi concentration camp after two years of abuse and horror.

Many Americans have read the book or seen the movie version, and have been deeply moved by the real life drama it claims to present. But have we been misled in the belief that Anne Frank actually wrote this diary? And if so, should an author be permitted to produce a work of fiction and sell it to the world as fact, particularly one of such tremendous emotional appeal? (And which causes hate and political action in government?)

The Swedish journal Frio Ord published two articles commenting on The Diary of Anne Frank. A condensation of these articles appeared in the April 15, 1959 issue of Economic Council Letter, as follows:

“History has many examples of myths that live a longer and richer life than truth. and may become more effective than truth.

The Western world has for some years (been) made aware of a young Jewish girl through the medium of what purports to be her personally written story, “Anne Frank’s Diary.” Any informed literary inspection of this book has shown it to have been impossible as the work of a teenager.

A noteworthy decision of the New York Supreme Court confirms this point of view, in that the well known American writer, Meyer Levin, has been awarded $50,000 to be paid him by the father of Anne Frank as an honorarium for Levin’s work on the “Anne Frank Diary.”

Mr. Frank, in Switzerland, had promised to pay to prominent Jewish author, Meyer Levin, not less than $50,000 because he had used the literary creation of author Levin in toto, and represented it to his publisher and the public as his late daughter’s original work.

Inquiry of the County Clerk, New York County, as to the facts of the case referred to in the Swedish press, brought a reply on April 23, 1962, giving the name of a New York firm of lawyers as “attorneys for the respondent.” Reference was to ”The Dairy of Anne Frank 2203-58.”

A letter to this firm brought a response on May 4, 1962 that “Although we represent Mr. Levin in other matters, we had nothing to do with the Anne Frank case.”

On May 7, 1962, came the following reply from a member of a firm of New York lawyers to whom the original inquiry had been forwarded:

 

“I was the attorney for Meyer Levin in his action against Otto Frank and others. It is true that a jury awarded Mr. Levin $50,000 in damages, as indicated in your letter. That award was later set aside by the trial justice. Hon. Samuel C. Coleman, on the ground that the damages had not been proved in the manner required by law. The action was subsequently settled between the litigating parties, while an appeal from Judge Coleman’s decision was pending.

I am afraid that the case itself is not officially reported, so far as the trial itself, or even Judge Coleman’s decision, is concerned. Certain procedural matters were reported. both in 141 New York Supplement. Second Series 170. and in 5 Second Series 181. The correct file number in the New York County Clerk‘s office is 2241-1956 and the file is probably a large and full one which must include Judge Coleman’s decision. Unfortunately, our file is in storage and 1 cannot locate a copy of that decision as it appeared in the New York Law Journal early in the year 1960.”

The Diary Of Anne Frank was first published in 1952 and immediately became a bestseller. It has been republished in paperback, 40 printings. It is impossible to estimate how many people have been touched and aroused by the movie production.

Why has the trial involving the father of Anne Frank, bearing directly on the authenticity of this book, never been “officially reported”? In royalties alone, Otto Frank has profited richly from the sale of this book, purporting to depict the tragic life of his daughter. But is it fact, or is it fiction? Is it truth or is it propaganda? Or is it a combination of all of these? And to what degree does it wrongfully appeal to the emotions through a misrepresentation as to its origin?

School publications for years have recommended this book for young people, presenting it as the work of Anne Frank. Advertising in advance of the movie showing has played up the “factual” nature of the drama being presented. Do not writers of such editorials and promoters of such advertising, “fan the flames of hate” they rightly profess to deplore?

Many American Jews were shocked at the handling of the Eichmann case, the distortions contained in the book Exodus and its movie counterpart, but their protests have had little publicity outside of their own organ, Issues, by the American Council for Judaism. Others who have expressed the same convictions have been charged with anti-Semitism. (So in other words, a proper lawful investigation cannot be conducted into the truthfulness of the Anne Frank diary because it would be considered “holocaust denial” and anti-Semitic!) Yet it is to be noted that both Otto Frank and his accuser Meyer Levin, were Jewish, so a similar charge would hardly be applicable in pursuing this subject to an honest conclusion..

File number 2241-1956 in the New York County Clerk’s office should be opened to the public view and its content thoroughly publicized. Misrepresentation, exaggeration, and falsification has too often colored the judgment of good citizens. If Mr. Frank used the work of Meyer Levin to present to the world what we have been led to believe is the literary work of his daughter, wholly or in part, then the truth should be exposed.

To label fiction as fact is never justified nor should it be condoned.

Since actual period documentation does not exist in support of the Holocaust myth, it has always been incumbent on its supporters to create it.

Not only is the “Anne Frank” diary now considered to be a fake, so also is “The Painted Bird” by Jerzy Kosinski. This book, which is a mass of pornographic and sadistic imagery which, had it not been taken so seriously by the Jewish community, would be merely the pathetic manifestation of a self-serving and very sick person.

This was duly exposed as a shabby, though much revered (by the Jewish community) and quoted, fraud. When this was exposed, Kosinski committed suicide. Later, in Kosinski’s footsteps we find the next fiction entitled “Fragments” by a Swiss Protestant named Bruno Dosseker who spent the war in Switzerland as a young child. Dosseker posed as a very young Baltic Jewish concentration camp inmate named Binjamin Wilkomerski. This work consists of allegedly fragmented “memories” and is very difficult to read.

Dosseker became the poster boy for the Holocaust supporters and was lionized by the international Jewish community, reaping considerable profit and many in-house awards for his wonderful and moving portrayal of German brutality and sexual sadism.

Another book, allegedly by a Hungarian doctor, concerning his deportation from Budapest in 1944 and subsequent journey by “Death Train” to Auschwitz is another fraud. There was never such a doctor in Hungary during the period involved and the alleged route of the train from Budapest to Auschwitz did not exist…

Insofar as the Anne Frank diary is concerned, herewith is some background on Anne Frank, her family and her alleged Diary:

The Franks were upper class German Jews, both coming from wealthy families. Otto and his siblings lived on the exclusive Meronstrasse in Frankfurt. Otto attended a private prep school, and also attended the Lessing Gymnasium, the most expensive school in Frankfurt.

Otto attended Heidelberg University. After graduation he left for a long vacation in England.

In 1909, the 20 year old Otto went to New York City where he stayed with his relatives, the Oppenheimers.

In 1925 Anne’s parents married and settled in Frankfurt, Germany. Anne was born in 1929. The Frank’s family business included banking, management of the springs at Bad Soden and the manufacture of cough drops. Anne’s mother, the former Edith Holländer, was the daughter of a manufacturer.

In 1934, Otto and his family moved to Amsterdam where he bought a spice business, Opekta, which manufactures Pectin used in making household jellies.

On May 1940, after the Germans occupied Amsterdam Otto remained in that city while his mother and brother moved to Switzerland. Otto remained in Amsterdam where his firm did business with the German Wehrmacht. From 1939 to 1944, Otto sold Opeka, and Pectin, to the German army. Pectin was a food preservative, and a anti infectant balm for wounds and as a thickener for raising blood volume in blood transfusions. Pectin was used as an emulsifier for petroleum, gelatized gasoline for fire bombing. By supplying the Wehrmacht, Otto Frank became, in the eyes of the Dutch, a Nazi collaborator.

On July 6, 1942 Otto moved the Frank family into the so-called ‘Secret Annex’. The annex is a three story, mostly glass townhouse that shares a garden park with fifty other apartments.

While he was allegedly in hiding, Otto Frank still managed his business, going downstairs to his office at night and on weekends. Anne and the others would go to Otto’s office and listen to radio broadcasts from England.

The purported diary begins on June 12, 1942, and runs to December 5,1942 . It consists of a book that is six by four by a quarter inches. In addition to this first diary, Anne supplemented it with personal letters. Otto said Anne heard Gerrit Bolkestein in a broadcast say: ~ “Keep a diary, and he would publish after the war”, and that’s why Anne’s father claimed she rewrote her diaries second time in 1944.

In this second edition, the new writer changed, rearranged and occasionally combined entries of various dates.

When Anne allegedly rewrote the diaries, SHE USED A BALL POINT PEN, WHICH DID NOT EXIST IN 1945, and the book took on an extremely high literary standard, and read more like a professional documentary than a child’s diary. In Anne’s SECOND EDITION her writing style, and handwriting, suddenly matured.

The actual diary of Anne Frank contained only about 150 notes, according to The New York Times, of October 2 ,1955.

In 1944, German authorities in occupied Holland determined that Otto Frank had been swindling then via his extensive and very lucrative Wehrmacht contracts. The German police then raided his apartment attic, and the eight Jews were sent to Westerbork work camp and forced to perform manual labor. Otto himself was sent to Auschwitz.. Anne, her sister Margot, and her mother, subsequently DIED OF TYPHUS IN ANOTHER CAMP. (Remember, Red Cross records showed that most deaths were of this Typhus fever origin, and deaths in these work camps (not death camps!) happened when supplies were cut off by allied forces bombing of railroads.)

In 1945, after being liberated from German custody, Otto returned to Amsterdam, where he claimed he found Anne’s diary cleverly hidden in the Annex’s rafters. However, another version has a Dutch friend, Meip Geis finding Anne’s diary of fictional events, which she then gave to Otto Frank.

Otto took what he claimed were Anne’s letters and notes, edited them into a book, which he then gave to his secretary, Isa Cauvern, to review. Isa Cauvern and her husband Albert Cauvern , a writer, authored the first diary.

Questions were raised by some publishers as to whether Isa and Albert Cauvern, who assisted Otto in typing out the work used the original diaries or whether they took it directly from Mr. Frank’s personal transcription.

American author, Meyer Levin wrote the THIRD and final edition…

At the outset of World War II Levin made documentary films for the US Office of War Information and later worked in France as a civilian expert in the Psychological Warfare Division.

–End Excerpt

(After Levin’s “Anne Frank” writing, he went on to create other fictional movies about Jews in concentration camps, including “Compulsion, Eva, The Fanatic, and “The Stronghold”. But at least these were dramatic fictions, and not passed off as real-life documentary non-fiction, though that is the effect of fictional holocaust propaganda films.)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

So what do Jews think about the Goyim (non-Jews)?

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

“American Jews are actually being trained (by Zionists) since childhood to interact with non-Jews in a deceitful and arrogant manner, in coordination with each other, to emotionally destroy non-Jews and Israel critics in addition to wrecking their careers and interfering with their social relationships. This is actually deliberate, wicked, planned behavior motivated by a narcissistic self-righteous fury… The problem is that non-Jews are taught through emotional pressure and violence via the media and the school system to be very sensitive to Jewish suffering so when a Zionist becomes outraged at them for challenging their world view, the non-Jew really has to fight against his own inner self in a huge battle against his “inner Jew” making him feel inadequate and intimidated. But the Jew doesn’t care how much he or she hurts others. Jews only care about what’s good for the Jews… I once reduced a 50 year old man to hysterical sobbing tears because I told him gently and lovingly that Jews were not that unique. I just told him the Jews, like everyone else, have had good times and bad times. Times when they were slaughtered and other times when they slaughtered others. Just like everyone else. Guess what he did next? He emotionally abused me in an insulting way and then cut off all further communication. Jewish behavior is so predictable that it’s truly scary… If you mention cutting off the money or if you mention the possible compromise of living with Palestinians as equals in one state they become very angry and start using bullying tactics, unless they have some reason to fear you, in which case they shun you and complain about you to the authorities, try to get you arrested or try and destroy your career or social status through character assassination… Zionists all believe in the myth of “1000 years of Jewish suffering” and feel that the world owes them compensation for their ancestors’ “unique” suffering. It’s a criminally insane viewpoint. They cope with the contradictions between their belief that they are the good guys and what Jews are actually doing to their neighbors, both in the Middle East and in the US, by developing mental health issues. Most Zionists are functional schizophrenics.  Karin Friedemann, an ethnically Jewish anti-Zionist blogger.

DEFINING JEWISH ERETZ YISROEL (i.e. ‘Greater Israel’):

It is the dream of Zionist Jews, such as the Chabad, that Israel will one day extend from the Litani river in the North [i.e. Lebanon] to the river Nile in the south [i.e. Egypt] to the Euphrates in the West [i.e. Iraq])…

“If Zionism today means Greater Israel, not only am I a post-Zionist, I am an anti-Zionist. If Zionism is (the illegal settlements of) Netzarim and Kiryat Arba, I am an anti-Zionist. I do not accept the type of Zionism that took Judaism, with all its dazzling beauty, and turned it into the worship of trees and stones. When I look around today, my feeling is that Netzarim has become an altar, God has become a Moloch (an idol) and our children have become sacrifices: human sacrifices to terrible idol worship.” —Avrahum Burg, former Jewish Speaker of the Israeli Knesset (legislature of Israel).

“The (U.N.) General Assembly determines that Zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination.” United Nations General Assembly Resolution Number 3379, which was later revoked under massive Zionist pressure by Resolution Number 4686.

Facts≈

-92% of all the land inside the Green Line of Israel is reserved for Jews only; the rest of the land, approximately 8%, is for the non-Jewish people who comprise 20% of the total Israeli population. Therefore, it is a segregated, apartheid country…

- This is further evidenced by the fact that there are Jews-only by-pass roads that go to Jews-only settlements built on stolen Palestinian land.

- Non-Jews are never given permits to build inside Israel.

“Judaism is not a religion. Judaism is not a race. Judaism is not a people. Judaism is a strategy. Judaism is the Jews´ strategy to dominate non-Jews. Judaism is the ideology of the occupation, which is behind the occupation of Palestine. Judaism is the ideology and the strategy which is behind genocide and cruelties carried out by Jews in Palestine. The Palestinian people is today the most manifest victim of Judaism: the crime syndicate that calls itself a “religion”. Judaism is a declaration of war against us. But where are the real men in this country who are supposed to defend us? I dream of the day when there is no Israel… Israel exists for one purpose which is to function as a hideout for those who live in the same state of perpetual war against everyone else that Judaism dictates.” Mark Glenn, November 7th, 2006, “Judaism is Nobody’s Friend”

“What emerged for me, from the study of the first chapters (of Sefer Haranya, the central works of the Chabad ultra-Orthodox organization) was the discovery that the main stream of Jewish thought is permeated by genetic spiritual superiority of Jews over Gentiles, disconcertingly reminiscent of racist notions of our time… Living in Israel for the past twenty years… I have come to realize the vitality of Jewish racist notions, and I am more than ever convinced that the hold Judaism will have on this and future generation will be gravely impaired unless these notions are neutralized…”  Moshe Greenberg, Biblical scholar and Jewish author, from his book “A Problematic Heritage – The Attitudes Toward the Gentile in the Jewish Tradition: An Israeli Perspective”.

“My final, more general example is, if possible, even more shocking than the others. It concerns the attitude of the Hassidic movement (i.e. Orthodox Judaism) toward non-Jews. What then, are the views of this movement concerning non-Jews? As an example, let us take the famous Hatanya, fundamental book of the Habbad movement… According to this book, all non-Jews are totally satanic creatures “in whom there is absolutely nothing good.” Even a non-Jewish embryo is quantatatively different from a Jewish one. The very existance of a non-Jew is “inessential”, whereas all of creation was created solely for the sake of the Jews. —Jewish Professor Israel Shahak, from his extensively researched book, Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years“.

“We have to recognize that Jewish blood, and the blood of a goy, are not the same thing.” —Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg, New York Times, June 6, 1989.

“The difference between a Jewish soul and souls of non-Jews – all of them in all different levels – is greater and deeper than the difference between a human soul and the souls of cattle.”   —Rabbi Kook, “The Elder”, from the book, “Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel”.

“Even the best of the non-Jews should all be killed.” —Rabbi Simon ben Yahai, Talmud, Minor Tractates, Soferim 15, Rule 10.

“One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail.” —Rabbi Yaacov Perrin, New York Daily News, February 28, 1994, page 6.

“The difference between a Jewish and a non-Jewish person stems from the common expression: ‘Let us differentiate’. Thus, we do not have a case of profound change in which a person is merely on a superior level. Rather, we have a case of ‘let us differentiate’ between totally different species. This is what needs to be said about the body: the body of a Jewish person is of a totally different quality from the body of (members) of all nations of the world… A non-Jew’s entire reality is only vanity. The entire creation (of a non-Jew) exists only for the sake of the Jews.” —Rabbi Menachem Scheerson, quoted by Brownfield, in the Washington report of Middle East Affairs, March 2000, pages 105-106.

The genius of the Jews is to live off people; not off the land, nor off the production of commodities from raw materials, but off people. Let other people till the soil; the Jew, if he can, will live off the tiller. Let other people toil at trades and manufacture; the Jew will exploit the fruits of their work. That is his particular genius. If this genius be described as parasitic, the term would seem to be justifiedThe Jewish nation is the only nation that possesses the secrets of all the rest… there is no government in the world so completely at their service as America. ‘The British did this…the Germans did that’ when it was the International Jew who actually did it... The Americans are (now known as) a sordid, greedy, cruel people. Why? Because Jewish money-power is centered here.
—Henry Ford, Ford Motor Company, American Icon, creator of the assembly line, author of “The International Jew” from which this quote is taken.

“When a Jew, in America or in South Africa, talks to his Jewish companions about ‘our’ government, he means the government of Israel.” —David Ben-Gurion, Israeli Prime Minister.

“There’s little outward anti-Semitism of the kind one sees in the western world… it’s a much warmer society than one imagines from the outside…” —Jewish Magazine, on Iran’s culture.

“But would the world permit such ethnic cleansing? That depends on who does it and how quickly it happens. We possess several hundred atomic warheads and rockets and can launch them at targets in all directions, perhaps even at Rome. Most European capitals are targets for our air force. Let me quote General Moshe Dyan. ‘Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother.’ We shall try to prevent things from coming to that if at all possible. We have the capability to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that that will happen before Israel goes under.” —Israeli Professor Martin Van Creveldwhom advocates the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians and suggests that Israel should use Nuclear Blackmail to commit ethnic crimes.

“I believe they feel a sense of outrage against the United States. They identify with the Palestinian problem, they identify with people who oppose repressive regimes, and I believe then to focus their anger on the United States. —James Fitzgerald, FBI Special Agent, testifying at the 911 Commission public hearing, referring to the “terrorists whom attacked the United States. This testimony was not included in the 911 Commission’s report.

“By his own account, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed’s animus toward the United States stemmed not from his experiences there as a student, but rather from his violent disagreement with U.S. foreign policy favoring Israel.” —Page 147 of the 9/11 Commission Report.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

The Talmud and the Protocols of Zion

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

A quick word on the Talmud and the Protocols of Zion. I wont get into this here, though the Protocols are like a playbook and instruction manual on how to subvert, demoralize, and take control of a society… and the Talmud is the book used in lieu of the Torah for the un-Godly Zionist Jews regarding the treatment of and death wish for non-Jews. Instead, I have included a link to this wonderfully put together video in 12 parts (set to auto-play onYoutube) called “The Khazrian Conspiracy”. Consider these the “bibles” of Zionism. I highly recomend this for a deeper understanding of where the Zionist hatred of all non-Jews and the “Synagogue of Satan” stems from:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Haj-CJOERTs&feature=PlayList&p=E88E9051B41E1CCE&playnext_from=PL&playnext=1&index=17

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Christian-Israeli Alliance… WTF?

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Should Christians really support Israel? Zionist Israeli Jews have led the fight against prayer in school, to ban Christmas carols in school, and to ban Christian symbols on public land and even at the White House – while Jewish Menorahs and other Jewish symbols hang freely. Again a result of less than 2% of the population defiling the majority. Zionists have lead the fight for abortion, for radical feminism, for homosexual marriage, and all but have a monopoly on the porn industry. And most Christians don’t know that around 30% of Palestinians are indeed Christian, and are being harassed, beaten, imprisoned, made homeless, bombed, maimed, and killed for simply being Palestinian and/or Christian.

—> Israel Anti-Christian Law 5738-1977 = 5 years in prison for “witnessing for Christ”. —Israeli Law

“The Israeli Government is anti-Christian.” —Archbishop Manougian.

“Christian Clergy Spit Upon Daily In Jerusalem” headline in Haaretz, A Jewish Newspaper.

“Wearing a dark blue robe, sitting in St. James’ Church… Aghoyan said, ‘Every single Priest in this church has been spat on. It happens day and night.” — Jerusalem Post. ***Note that nuns are spat on as well, and that beating or killing women and children have no moral limitations as compared to men. The percentage of deaths for Palestinians is about 50% men, and 50% women and children.

—In a recorded phone conversation between Billy Graham and Richard Nixon—

Nixon: Wasn’t that a horrible thing, those Israelis shooting down that plane (another terrorist attack, this time killing over 100)? I mean to shoot down an unarmed 707, good heavens! That’s worse than what they did at the Olympics on the other side (Yes, another Israeli terrorist attack…).

Graham: Well, you see, there’s two other points. One is the front page of papers over the weekend carried the story that they’re talking about expelling all Christians from Israel.

Nixon: Oh, isn’t that nice?

Graham: And the second point is that the Jews in this country are just raising a big… And they are damning ‘Campus Crusade’ and damning so forth… they are going right after the church, and there’s a great deal of feeling beginning to rise…

Nixon: It happened in Spain, it’s happened in Germany, it’s happening – and now it’s going to happen in America if these people (Jews) don’t start behaving.

Graham: Well, you know, I told you one time that the Bible talks about two kinds of Jews. One is called “The Synagogue of Satan“. They’re the ones putting out the pornographic literature. They’re the ones putting out these obscene films.

Nixon: Like the thing in Time Magazine and then Newsweek.

Graham: It’s terrible… Ruth canceled both of them.

Nixon: Good for her, but…

Graham: …we wont take Time or Newsweek.

Nixon: I’ll tell you… this group – I think really they don’t deserve to live! …Newsweek is totally, it’s all run by Jews and dominated by them in their editorial pages. The New York Times, the Washington Post, totally Jewish too…

Graham: This stranglehold has got to be broken or this country is going to go down the drain.

Nixon: Do you believe that?

Graham: Yes sir.

Nixon: I can’t ever say it, but I believe it…


I went to a Jewish meeting and said that I would crawl to beg forgiveness.” —Billy Graham, in order to save his “ministry”, to the anti-Christian Zionist Jews, after the above conversation was made public.

“A church can become dysfunctional because a psychopath gains control, and it’s not always the pastor…soon the whole church goes insane” —Texe Marrs, Author, from “The Rise of the Illuminati Psychopaths and The Savage Horror of America’s Coming Gloom”

“(Christian churches are) going Jew! And their pastors demand to be called “Rabbi”. Their people are wearing Jewish garments and are into Yiddish songs and dancing in a circle. Meanwhile, some are working on a Christian Talmud, a book of laws and traditions for all Christians to obey.” —Texe Marrs, Author, quoted from his website – http://www.texemarrs.com/

“If we (Christians) hated the Jews, we wouldn’t want to see them in Heaven with us, would we? We’d want to see them go to Hell. But it’s the Christian who truly loves the Jews, who truly wants the best for them. And that’s why we preach to the Jews, as well as to Gentiles.” —Texe Marrs, Author, from his video “Thunder Over Zion”. His point being that this is a huge difference between the use of the word Goyim by Zionist Jews to describe non-Jews or “Gentiles” as cattle without a soul.

From the bible…

“I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the Synagogue of Satan.” —Revelation 2:9

“His Blood be on us and our children!”    —Matthew 27:25, depicting Jews yelling about crucifying Jesus.

“And no man spoke of him for fear of the Jews.” —John 7:13, referring to Jews killing Christians.

“For you suffered as your own countrymen did from the Jews, who killed both the Lord Jesus and the prophets, and drove us out, and displease God and oppose all mankind. Who keep us from speaking to the Gentiles that they might be saved. But God’s wrath has come upon them at last!” — Thessalonians 2:14-16.

“What exactly is so scandalous (about the Talmud)? How about Jesus punished in Hell for eternity by being made to sit in a cauldron of boiling excrement?” —Publishers Weekly, referring to the Talmud.

Good, I- I hope the Jews did kill Christ. I’d do it again! I’d fucking do it again in a second!” — Sara Silverman, Jewish Zionist comedian, in stand up routine.

“The only reason that Jews are in pornography is that we think that Christ sucks.” —Jewish Zionist, Al Goldstein, publisher of ‘Screw’ magazine.

“Pornography thus becomes a way of defiling Christian culture… (Porn kings are motivated by a Jewish) atavistic hatred of Christian authority: they are trying to weaken the dominant culture in America by moral subversion…”   —Jewish Zionist Professor Nathan Abrams, in the ‘Jewish Intelectual Quarterly’, bragging about the Jewish domination of the porn industry.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Do Jews really own the media and run Hollywood?

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

“Four of the largest five entertainment giants are now run or owned by Jews. Rupert Murdoch’s NewsCorp is the only gentile (non-Jew) holdout. However, Rupert is as pro-Israel as any Jew, probably more so.” —The Los Angeles Jewish Times, Oct. 29, 1999. Also, Murdoch’s NewsCorp has Jewish Zionist Peter Chernin as its President and CEO. All of these companies were started originally by Gentiles, and infiltrated incrementally by Rothschild’s Zionists.

“The Jews Control Hollywood – So What?” —Cover of Moment, “The Jewish Magazine for the ’90s”, Aug. 1996 edition. Authored by Zionist Jew Michael Medved.

“It makes no sense at all to try to deny the reality of Jewish power and prominence in popular culture. Any list of the most influential production executives at each of the recognizably Jewish studios will produce a heavy majority of recognizably Jewish names… The famous Disney organization, which was founded by Walt Disney, a gentile Midwesterner who allegedly harbored anti-Semitic attitudes, now features Jewish personnel in nearly all its most powerful positions… Men and women of Jewish background enjoy a vastly disproportionate – if not dominant – influence in Hollywood. (even studios which were bought out by the Japanese Sony Corp. and by the Australian Jew Rupert Murdoch, still had to hire) …A Yiddish team of long-time industry leaders in all the most powerful positions. When Mitsushita took over MCA-Universal, they did nothing to undermine the unquestioned authority of Universal’s legendary – and all-Jewish management triad of Lew Wasserman, Sid Scheinberg and Tom Pollack…” (Medved further writes that most of today’s movie moguls graduated from Ivy League colleges) “…where Jews are vastly over-represented – just as they are in Hollywood..”

For instance, Jewish students equal about 23% of total students at Harvard University, equal to the number of whites. Remember, we are talking about less than 2% of the American population here compared to 75%.

continued… “Poll after poll, taken over the past 10 years, shows that the public believes this industry is more firmly associated with Jews than any other business in the world. That it is almost universally viewed as a destructive force in our society should be of concern. The combined weight of so many Jews in one of America’s most lucrative and important industries gives the Jews of Hollywood a great deal of political power. They are a major source of money for Democratic candidates. The industry’s informal patriarch, MCA chairman Lew Wasserman, wields tremendous personal clout in state and national politics. So do Barbara Streisand, Norman Lear and others.” —Jewish Zionist Michael Medved, Moment, Aug. 1996 edition.

“Hollywood is run by Jews – it is owned by Jews! (The Jews have slandered every other racial group) …but are ever so careful to insure that there is never any negative image of the Kike (in the media).” Marlon Brando, on the Larry King Live show, April 5th 1996, to Larry King. For this, Marlon Brando was labeled “anti-Semitic” and forced to apologize to the Jews running the Simon Wiesenthal Holocaust Tourist Center in Los Angeles.

“…it just shows how dumb America has gotten. Jews totally run Hollywood.” —Zionist Jew Joel Stein, Los Angeles Times – Opinion section, “How Jewish Is Hollywood?”

continued… “I don’t care if Americans think (Jews) we’re running the news media, Hollywood, Wall Street, or the Government. I just care that we get to keep running them… How deeply Jewish is Hollywood? When the studio chiefs took out a full page ad in the Los Angeles Times a few weeks ago to demand that the Screen Actors Guild settle its contract, the open letter was signed by:

-The Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers:

- Peter Chernin, (Jewish Zionist) Chairman & CEO, the Fox Group

- Brad Grey (Jewish Zionist), Chairman and CEO, Paramout Pictures Corp.

- Robert A. Iger (Jewish Zionist),President & CEO, The Walt Disney Company

- Michael Lynton (Dutch Jewish Zionist), Chairman & CEO, Sony Pictures Entertainment

- Barry M. Mayer (Jewish Zionist), Chairman & CEO, Warner Bros.

- Leslie Moonves (Jewish Zionist whose great uncle was the first prime minister of Israel), Chairman & CEO, CBS Corp.

- Harry Sloan (Jewish Zionist), Chairman & CEO, MGM

- Jeff Zucker (Jewish Zionist), President & CEO, NBC Universal”

Continued… “If either of the Weinstein brothers had signed, this group would have not only the power to shut down all film production but to form a minyan (Minimum Adult Jews required for a communal religious service) with enough Fiji water on hand to fill a mikvah (a ritual purification and cleansing bath that Orthodox Jews take on certain occasions (as before Sabbath or after menstruation). The person they were yelling at in that ad was SAG President Alan Rosenberg (Jewish Zionist). The scathing rebuttal to this ad was written by entertainment super-agent Ari Emanuel (Israeli Jewish Zionist).” —Joel Stein, Los Angeles Times – Opinion, “How Jewish Is Hollywood?”

“The assertion that Jews “control” Hollywod, the media, banking and finance, among other things, is an anti-Semitic canard which dates back more than 70 years to an anti-Jewish campaign waged in the 1920’s…” —Abe Boxman, Zionist Jew and head of the Anti-Defamation League, in an ADL Publication entitled “Alleged Jewish ‘Control’ of the American Motion Picture Industry”. The ADL is a Zionist, pro-Israeli, and extremely powerful lobby, which labels anything anti-Israel or anti-Zionist as racist and anti-Semitic, despite the fact that Zionist Israelis are not Semitic, but in fact Khazarian in origin and are occupying stolen Palestinian land. Thus, any healthy information or debate is stopped dead in its tracks and immediately labeled racist or politically incorrect.

“As a fan, I thank you. As your producer, I thank you. As a member of the Jewish tribe, I thank you… Are you kidding me? This movie is a fucking Jewish wet dream.” —Lawrence Bender, co-producer of Inglorious Basterds, and Zionist extremist; to Quentin Tarantino.

(Bender is) “…a prominent liberal and pro-Israel activist. Inglorious Basterds brings together his greatest passions, movies, politics, and a cherished Jewish identity. Bender has leveraged his political clout to support causes he cares about…” —The Jewish Journal, August 18, 2009, article titled “The Other Avenger: Tarantino’s Producer Lawrence Bender”. This movie, by the way, is disgusting, extremely and unessesarily violent, and revolting, which is apparently the cause he cares about as it subverts society and Christianity, and spreads Holocaust lies.

“I have to tell you how exited I am to take this movie to Israel…” —Lawrence Bender, co-producer of Inglorious Basterds, and Zionist extremist. Imagine the hatred being spread in these movies, and the violence that they will inspire Israeli Jews to inflict on innocent Palestinians, their only outlet for this type of hate-filled propaganda.

“Jewish (torture) Porn… It’s almost a deep sexual satisfaction of wanting to beat Nazi’s to death, an orgasmic feeling. My parents are very strong about ‘Holocaust education‘.” —Eli Roth, kingpin of the “torture porn” genre, Jewish Zionist actor/writer/director, referring to Inglorious Basterds. Roth won awards for “Hostel”, by Hollywood’s Zionist elite, who praise him for his work in most Jewish-owned celebrity magazines. Hostel was a movie that made me quit movies for a while!

…Schindler’s List, winner of seven Academy Awards, seen by millions and used as a teaching tool since it appeared in 1993… Today it seems that films about the Holocaust and events surrounding it abound. Almost with a bizarre regularity they reach the big screen in twos or threes… Putting a new twist on the Holocaust genre for a new time and a new audience was none other than the renowned filmmaker Quentin Tarantino. While he opens his Inglourious Basterds with a scene repeated untold times during the Holocaust – a Jewish family hidden by a Christian family is discovered by a Nazi commandant and executed – the film morphs into an allegory about good and evil and the no-holds-barred efforts to defeat the evil personified by Hitler, his henchmen and his Nazi regime. Employing drama, comedy and romance with the quintessential Quentin Tarantino touch, the film is entertaining, yet thought-provoking. Hopefully the millions who see it will understand the horrors of the Holocaust and echo my view of “if only it were true!” Like its predecessors Schindler’s List and Life is Beautiful, Inglorious Basterds should be recognized with an Academy Award.” —Abe Foxman, National Director of the Anti-Defamation League, Huffington Post online. February 18, 2010. Apparently, violence, horror, torture and blood-letting of non-Jews is not considered defamation, according to the Anti-Defamation League.

Inglorious Basterds was nominated for 8 Academy Award nominations. This is more or as many as some of the greatest films ever made: Gone With The Wind, Ben Hur, Titanic, The Lord of The Rings, Inglorious Basterds… one of these doesn’t fit… that is unless you are a Jewish Zionist who loves “torture porn” and are the one doing the judging…

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

OK… but surely they don’t control our government???

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

“You know very well, and the stupid Americans know equally well, that we control their government, irrespective of who sits in the White House. You see, I know it and you know it that no American president can be in a position to challenge us even if we do the unthinkable. What can they (Americans) do to us? We control congress, we control the media, we control show biz, and we control everything in America. In America you can criticize God, but you can’t criticize Israel…”Israeli spokeswoman, Tzipora Menache

“Future historians will record that the Jews replaced the old Protestant elite, who had run the city (of New York)… until their power was finally shattered by the cultural metamorphosis of 1968…” —Jewish writer David Samuels, New York Magazine.

“For perhaps another generation, an optimistic forecast, the Jewish community is thus in a position where it will be able to divide and conquer (Americans and Christians) and enter into selective coalitions that support our agenda.” —Jewish Zionist Stephen Steinlight, former head of National Affairs for the American Jewish Committee (AJC), the most powerful Jewish organization in America.

Idiot Savant, George W. Bush…

“Our war on terror begins with Al Qaeda. But it does not end there. It will not end until every terrorist group of global reach has been found, stopped, and defeated

Let me just pause here and say… “Hey asshole! What about Israel?”

“…Americans are asking, ‘Why do they hate us?’ They hate what they see right here in this (congressional) chamber – a democratically elected government…

Oh, sorry again… but shouldn’t we be electing our president in a republic form of government, as per the constitution you pretend to follow, as opposed to the communist platform of democracy?

“…Their leaders are self-appointed.”

Damn Bush Jr… you make it really hard not to interrupt! Didn’t you appoint all of our real leaders during your term, most of them Israeli Zionist Jews with duel-citizenship (about 32 of them in fact), including your Chief of Staff, Secretary of Defence, Treasury Secretary, Secretary of State, Supreme Court Justices, etc, etc, etc…?

“…They hate our freedoms. Our freedom of religion. Our freedom of speech. Our freedom to vote (rigged) and assemble (by permit) and disagree (without hate-speech) with each other…” —Crookedly and unconstitutionally “elected” President of the United States (corporation) George W. Bush, September 20, 2001, addressing a joint session of Zionist controlled congress, and also the American people through the Zionist controlled media.


“If the attackers simply hated freedom, why did they not attack Switzerland or Iceland, the oldest democracies on Earth? The primary motivation of those who attack us is because the American government supports Israel’s conquest, ethnic cleansing, occupation, torture, and murder (of) the Palestinian people – as shown in the recent carnage in Gaza. The establishment does not want the American people to understand this.” —David Duke, about 9/11 and who was responsible. Naturally, David Duke is labeled as anti-Semitic.

“…between 50% and 70% of political campaign contributions for President come from Jewish sources.” —Washington Post, January 21, 1993.

“In presidential elections, Democratic candidates depend on Jewish supporters to supply as much as 60 percent of the money raised from private sources.” —Washington Post, March 13, 2003. A major source of republican funds come from the same sources.


Democrat Obama’s top presidential campaign contributors were Jewish Zionist owned Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan Chase was third, and Citigroup (Citibank) was fifth.

Inversely, Republican McCain’s top presidential campaign contributors were also Merill Lynch at number one, Citigroup at number two, Goldman Sachs at number three, Morgan Stanley at number four, and JP Morgan Chase at number six.

So we must ask why the same Zionist Jewish controlled banks are supporting both sides of the political spectrum? The answer is simple… To buy a presidential candidate whom will then appoint tens and hundreds of unelected officials to his cabinet, ensuring a Zionist Jewish run American government without any representatives of the actual American population. Throughout history, bankers have been funding governments and wars on both sides. This ensures compliance with the money masters – the international banking elite.

This represents a complete take-over of American foreign policy, and indeed politics and the government itself, by Jewish Zionist extremists and those who support them, either willingly or because they have to be in politics without being ostracized by the Zionist run media.

“We, The Jewish People, Control America”   Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert

“The most powerful lobby in the United States congress is AIPAC; the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. Now get that… Doesn’t it seem odd that the most powerful lobby in our U.S. congress is for a foreign country?” —David Duke, former U.S. House of Representatives, Louisiana.

“The U.S. has no longer a government of goyim (non-Jews)… In the National Security Council, 7 out of 11 top staffers are Jews. Clinton had especially placed them in the most sensitive junctions in the U.S. security and foreign administrations.” —Major Israeli Daily, Maariv, September 2, 1994, article entitled “The Jews Who Run Clinton’s Court”.

“Foreign policy gets very complicated. When you take certain actions to support a friend – the security of Israel – as we did, it has consequences. No question about it.” —Lee H. Hamilton, 9/11 commission member, about U.S. Israel foreign policy relating to 9/11.

“We can still remember the smell of Auschwitz and Treblinka… next time we will take all of you with us!” —Israeli official, as quoted by Seymour M. Hersh’s “The Samson Option”.

“The only two non Jews in the communist conspiracy were Chambers and Hiss. Every other one was a Jew and it raised hell with us.” President Richard Nixon, 1971, White House released by the National Archives in 1999, I.E. Whittaker Chambers and Alger Hiss, Reference in N.Y. Times, Oct. 7, 1999 and Newsweek, Oct. 18, 1999, p. 30)

And lets not forget who runs our country through the manipulation and control of the American dollar. Chairman Ben Shalom Bernake and vice-chairman Donald Kohn, as well as former chairman Alan Greenspan are all extreme Zionist Jews. And remember, they are the ones deciding which of the Zionist – and the few non-Zionist controlled banks get the “bail-out” money from the American Taxpayers. This “bail-out” is nothing more than theft, and a consolidation effort of the worlds international Zionist banks… Zionists giving American money to Zionists.

≈Forced Equality≈

The New York Times has been a powerful and influential newspaper for 114 years, perhaps the mot powerful. Though it was founded in the 1950’s by American’s of white European decent, it’s had a succession of all Zionist Jewish owners and CEO’s since 1896, as follows… Adolf Ochs, Arthur Sulzberger, Orvil Dryfoos, A.O. Sulzberger, and Arthur Sulzberger Jr. So much for equal opportunity or fair and ballanced reporting, eh?

(headline) “New York Times Pays Execs Extra To Hire Minorities And Women Instead Of White Guys” (story) “Another fun fact from the New York Time’s proxy: Senior executives can get an extra bonus for hiring minorities and women instead of white guys. The [Compensation] Committee also retained the discretion to “increase or decrease the individual component of the total bonus paid to each executive by up to 10% based on the continuing development of a diverse work force, including the inclusion of diverse candidates in hiring processes and the demonstration of personal commitment to diversity through participation in diversity-related activities, such as mentoring and sponsorship of affinity groups.” —Business Insider, The Wire

“The New York times… revealed, a bizarre bonus for hiring minorities… a bonus structure designed to diversify the work force, by rewarding executives who hire minorities:… “regional media group” CEO Michael Golden… received an extra 5% through this structure.” —Huffington Post

“God gave you your skin color, so why not use it to your advantage?” —The Reverend Jesse Jackson, about Affirmative Action…

OK, I know he’s not Jewish, but he supports the racist bills perpetrated by Zionists, which allow less qualified minorities to get a job or promotion over the most qualified applicant – regardless of race or color – while subverting the black populace in America by making education less of a priority. In other words, the same Zionists who have purposefully subverted and dumbed down the public school system are destroying the need and will to get an education for the black minority, while making whites in America wonder, “what good is an education with quota laws?”. A political reverend without a congregation or a church should really not be trusted, and that goes for all evangelists, white or black.

With the Los Angeles parking police department being a private corporation based out of New York City, who hires minorities only with no constitutional oath or police training, the inequality of forced equality is just another subversive tactic to destroy our country’s pride, productivity, education, and work ethic.

One must look at who supports these Affirmative Action laws… a Zionist infiltrated U.S. Government and a Fortune 500 base of corporations that are Zionist owned, operated, beholden, or influenced. Affirmative Action is not a civil rights tool used to benefit minorities, but a tool of absolute manipulation and destruction of American society. It is neither Constitutional (I.E. “all men are created equal”) nor Democratic (I.E. “majority rules”).

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Israeli thoughts on war, murder, Gentiles, Arabs, and Palestine…

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

“(Jews, he himself) doesn’t believe in western morality… The only way to fight a moral war is the Jewish way: destroy their holy sites. Kill men, women, and children (and cattle).” —Manis Friedman, famous Jewish Rabbi.

“Even the best of the non-Jews should all be killed.” —Rabbi Simon ben Yahai, Talmud, Minor Tractates, Soferim 15, Rule 10.

“One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail.” —Rabbi Yaacov Perrin, New York Daily News, February 28, 1994, page 6.

“Israel tortures at least 500 Palestinians a month. (6000 per year)” (Paraphrase) —Jewish Alan Greenberg, New York Times

“Almost 50% of (Palestinian) detainees who were arrested in raids or at random were beaten by the army or police before they were handed over to the Shin Bet for interrogation. The prisoners were interrogated for 5 to 10 hours a day for an average of 35 days, and spent most of their time in tiny cells in solitary confinement. They were effectively starved and their only exercise was the walk from the cell to the interrogation room during which they were shackled, handcuffed and blindfolded.” —Report compiled by Israeli human rights group B’Tselem…

This might explain the Zionist influenced U.S. military doctrine of torture utilized on Arab prisoners in American prison camps like Abu Gharib, which are blatant war crimes and completely against Geneva conventions… There was a time when America was idealistically and morally opposed to these tactics. But now America is under Zionist rule.

“I will confess it, at least, like thousands of other typical Jewish kids of my generation, I was reared as a Jewish nationalist, even a quasi-separatist (he was raised in America). Every summer for two months for 10 formative years during my childhood and adolescence I attended a Jewish summer camp. There, each morning, I saluted a foreign flag, dressed in a uniform reflecting its colors, sang a foreign national anthem, learned a foreign language, learned foreign folk songs and dances, and was taught that Israel was the true homeland (for American Jews)… I was taught the superiority of my people to the gentiles who had oppressed us. We were taught to view non-Jews as untrustworthy outsiders; people from whom sudden gusts of hatred might be anticipated, people less sensitive, intelligent, and moral than ourselves. We were also taught that the lesson of our dark history is that we could rely on no one.” —Jewish Zionist Stephen Steinlight, former head of National Affairs for the American Jewish Committee (AJC), the most powerful Jewish organization in America.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

So what can we, the 98% Gentiles and 1.9% Jews do?

Boycott Zionist Israel and the corporations that support it!

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

In order to give you an idea of what a boycott of Israel (and Zionism) would entail, here are some of the deeply ingrained corporations that most of us take for granted, which are run by and supported by Israel and/or Zionist sympathizers:

On the internet – Google, Youtube, Facebook, MySpace, Wikipedia (or as I like to call it… do-it-yourself history), Yahoo, Ebay, and many others…


Estee Lauder – Ronald Lauder – the billionaire Estee Lauder Cosmetics magnate, was the chairman of New York Governor George Pataki’s commission on privatization. He is the key individual who lobbied for the privatization of the World Trade Center, and also got the former Stewart Air Force Base to become privatized. Oddly, but probably not coincidentally, the flight paths of flight 175 and flight 11 converged directly over this airport on 9/11. Zionist Jew Ronald Lauder is active in the following organizations: Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, Jewish National Fund, World Jewish Congress, American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee, Anti-Defamation League, and the Jewish Theological Seminary. Ronald Lauder was elected president of the World Jewish Congress on June 10, 2007. Lauder founded a school for the Mossad in Herzliya, for which Israel called the Lauder School of Government Diplomacy and Strategy. He is the key Sayan involved in the preparation of 9/11.

Sayan (Hebrew: helpers, assistants) is a term used to describe a network of Jews living outside of Israel who volunteer to provide assistance to the Israeli Mossad.


AOL Time Warner – AOL allocates 30% of its investment portfolio to Israel.

“… We would also challenge them to consider that AOL allocates 30% of its investment portfolio in Israel. Does that effect how CNN reports on the Israeli/Palestinian conflict? At NileMedia, we think it does. The “spin” wizards at CNN, TIME and AOL are not in the journalism business.” —Nile Media

In 1998, Mr. Ted Leonsis, CEO of AOL studios (a business unit of AOL) received the Jubilee Award by the Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu. This is the highest tribute ever awarded by the “State of Israel” in recognition of those individuals and organizations, that through their investments and trade relationships, have done the most to strengthen the Israeli economy.

Starbucks Coffee - Howard Schultz, the chairman of Starbucks is an active Zionist. In 1998 he was honored by the Jerusalem Fund of Aish HaTorah with ‘The Israel 50th Anniversary Friend of Zion Tribute Award’ for his services to the Zionist state in “playing a key role in promoting close alliance between the United States and Israel”. “I congratulate Aish HaTorah for what they’re doing, where they’re doing it, and for whom they’re doing it.” The Jerusalem Fund of Aish HaTorah sponsors Israeli military arms fairs chaired by the butcher of Jenin – General Shaul Mofaz, Israel’s Minister of Defense. It aims to “strengthen the special connection between the American, European and Israeli defense industries” and “to showcase the newest Israeli innovations in defense”. It produces pro-Zionist propaganda material for Israel.

Star-bucks  =  Star of David + Dollars  =  Dollars for Israel.

Coca-Cola Company (and it’s over 3,000 beverages) - From 1966 Coca-Cola has been a staunch supporter of Israel. In 1997 the Government of Israel Economic Mission honored Coca-Cola at the Israel Trade Award Dinner for its continued support of Israel for the last 30 years and for refusing to abide by the Arab League boycott of Israel. Every year Coca Cola bankrolls the American-Israel Chamber of Commerce Awards which honors companies that have contributed most to the Israeli economy. In 2009 a Coca-Cola sponsored award went to Israel’s Lobby AIPAC for its lobbying of the Senate to reject of the UN call for “immediate ceasefire” and endorse the continuation of the Israel military assault on Gaza. In 2008 Coca-Cola tasked the Israeli venture capital Challenge Fund to locate suitable investments in Israel with a promise of “a blank check”. This agreement is exceptional in the Israeli venture capital industry. In September 2009 Coca-Cola hosted a special reception at the Coca-Cola world headquarters to honor Brigadier-General Binyamin Ben-Eliezer, Israel’s ex-Minister of Defense currently Minister of Industry, Trade & Labor. Brigadier-General Binyamin Ben-Eliezer is a wanted war criminal. According to Dr.Aryeh Yitzhaki, a mainstream Israeli military historian, the IDF killed around a 1000 Egyptian POW’s during the Six-Day War. Ben-Eliezer’s “Shaked unit” was responsible for one-third of those murders. This is to say nothing of the ecological and water depletion problems Coca-Cola casues in third world countries leading to crop failure and livestock and human malnutrition and starvation.

Another top movie on my list explaining water supply and depletion for profit at the expense of the local people is called “Flow”. And once again It is a must watch – http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4548621530723720885#

Disney Corporation (Pixar, Marvel, Theme Parks) – Robert Alan “Bob” Iger, president and CEO of Disney, is a Zionist Jew. He was named president of the company in 2000, and later succeeded Zionist Jew Michael Eisner as chief executive in 2005. Iger oversaw the acquisitions of Pixar in 2006 and of Marvel Entertainment in 2009. Walt Disney’s Millennium exhibition at the Epcot Center in Florida depicts Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. Jerusalem is an illegally occupied city according to international law (UN resolution 242, 237, and 405) and can never be the capital of Israel. Of the 8 million dollars it cost to set up the Epcot exhibition, Israel contributed 1.8 million and worked with Disney to develop its content. This is part of Israels campaign to physically “Judaise” Jerusalem and mentally condition the world into accepting its claims over Jerusalem. Interestingly, Walt Disney was known to be an anti-Zionist!

McDonald’s Restaurants – Zionist Jack M. Greenberg, chairman and CEO of McDonald’s, is an honorary director of the American-Israel Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Inc., of Metropolitan Chicago. According to the Chicago Jewish Community Online (website of the Jewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago), McDonald’s Corporation whose global headquarters is based just outside Chicago is a major corporate partner of the Jewish United Fund and Jewish Federation. Through its Israel Commission, the Jewish United Fund “works to maintain American military, economic and diplomatic support for Israel; monitors and, when necessary, responds to media coverage of Israel”. In the Jewish United Fund’s outreach program, they pay for Christian leaders and American high school kids to visit Israel and be fed Zionist lies. McDonald’s entered the Israeli market in 1993 and now has 80 restaurants across Israel, providing employment to some 3000 Israelis.

Home Depot – Bernard Marcus, Founder and Co-Chairman of the Board, is an active Zionist. He is on the board of directors of Emet, the Pro-Israel Media “War Room” whose function is to ensure that all media in the US stays biased in favor of Israel. “A group of American business and political leaders are building a pro-Israel media “war room” in Washington, D.C. The group will be called “Emet” – which in Hebrew means “truth.” Emet will try to address biased media coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and also make the case that the conflict, while serious and important, pales in comparison to the larger Geo-strategic threat posed to the United States and the West by Iran and Iraq, both of whom are trying to build and/or acquire weapons of mass destruction (a blatent lie). Funding Emet is Leonard Abramson; he sold U.S. Healthcare to Aetna in the mid-1990s for $8.9 billion. Abramson has recruited a powerful board of directors, including Bernie Marcus, founder of Home Depot; Les Wexner, founder of The Limited; Edgar Bronfman Sr., who once owned Seagram’s; and Lou Ranieri, a major Wall Street player who now co-owns one of Israel’s largest banks. Also joining the board are Jeane Kirkpatrick, former U.S. Ambassador to the UN, and Jack Kemp.”


News Corporation (Fox News, Sky TV Network, National Geographic, The Wall Street Journal, The Sun, The Times, The New York Post, and on and on and on…) – Extreme Zionist Jew and propaganda master Rupert Murdoch is the world’s leading publisher of English-language newspapers, and its diversified global operations include the production and distribution of motion pictures and television programming; television, satellite and cable broadcasting; the publication of newspapers, magazines and books; the production and distribution of promotional and advertising products and services; and the development of digital broadcasting. The Company publishes more than 175 different newspapers – the same news from the same source! News Corp. invests heavily in Israel, and was one of three US companies that was praised for their support of Israel at the America-Israel Friendship League Partners for Democracy Awards dinner (25th June 2001). Murdoch himself co-chaired the dinner.

Intel - One of the biggest supporters of Israel. Their very first development center outside the U.S. was opened in Haifa in 1974. Since then they have continued pouring investment in to Israel. By year 2000, they employ over 4000 Israelis. Exports from their Lachish-Qiryat Gat plant in Israel (opened Feb 99) total $3 million a day at peak capacity , or approximately $1 billion a year. Al-Awda (Palestine Right to Return Coalition) have pointed out that the Intel plant at “Qiryat Gat” is built on land Israel confiscated from Palestinian villages of Iraq al Manshiya. Iraq al Manshiya was a village of 2000 people living in 300 houses with two mosques and one school. The original Palestinian inhabitants were terrorized out of the village and then the whole village was razed to the ground to prepare the way for the new Israeli settlement of Qiryat Gat. Today the remaining population from Iraq al Manshiya is still not allowed to return. Legal action against Intel for building on looted land is being considered. Intel’s investments in apartheid education in Israel: “Intel invests in the promotion of higher education in Israel. In addition to scholarships for students, it allocates considerable resources to funding research and purchasing laboratory equipment.” http://www.intel.com/intel/community/israel/education.htm

A boycott of Intel would probably mean not using or buying the computer you are using to read this, and having to build one yourself with anti-Zionist chips, motherboards, adapters, controllers, network products, wireless components, embedded products, and finally buying software that wasn’t developed on any of Intel’s Software Development Tools! Good luck with that!!!

IBM – IBM invests heavily in Israel. Lawrence Ricciardi, IBM senior vice-president and general counsel, who noted that his company employs 1,700 people in Israel, said in an interview with the Jerusalem Post, “This wedge of land and the huge ideals it represents are very important to IBM.” IBM was one of three US companies that was praised at the America-Israel Friendship League Partners for Democracy Awards dinner (25th June 2001) hosted by Sharon. In May 2002 the Israel-America Chamber of Commerce awarded IBM the Ambassador’s Award “in recognition of its outstanding contribution to the development of the Israeli high-tech industry and to advancing trade between the U.S. and Israel.

This is almost humorous when one considers that IBM is quite famous for knowingly manufacturing the hole-punch cards and punching machines used by the Nazis in the World War 2 labor camps to document and keep track of their Jewish prisoners. This would be like creating bar code tattoos for todays FEMA prison camps.

“Don’t tell us what you are doing, and don’t ask us any questions.”   —cable message to all of IBM’s Eastern Europe subsidiaries, October 1941, as sudden new trading with the enemy regulations were about to go into force as America was about to enter the war.

“The fact that Hollerith equipment manufactured by (IBM’s German unit) Dehomag was used by the Nazi administration has long been known and is not new information… This information was published in 1997 in the IEEE Annals of the History of Computing and in 1998 in Washington Jewish Week.” —IBM representative Carol Makovich, writing in an e-mail interview by Edwin Black while researching his book “IBM and the Holocaust”.

Danone (Dannon) – In 1998, Mr. Franck Riboud, on behalf of Danone received the Jubilee Award by the Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu. This is the highest tribute ever awarded by the “State of Israel” in recognition of those individuals and organizations, that through their investments and trade relationships, have done the most to strengthen the Israeli economy. The Danone Institute, an R & D facility, was established in Israel in July 1998.

In order to boycott Danone (Dannon), you would have to stop eating their yogurt and other dairy products or anything from Strauss Dairy, all of HP Foods including Lea & Perrins sauces, and Evian and Volvic bottled water… among other things.

Nestle’ – This Swiss company owns 50.1% of Israeli food maker Osem Investments. In December of 2000 Nestle’ announced that it will invest millions of dollars to operate the new R&D center in Israel. In 1998, Mr. Peter Brabeck-Letmathe on behalf of Nestle, received the Jubilee Award by the Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu. This is the highest tribute ever awarded by the “State of Israel” in recognition of those individuals and organizations, that through their investments and trade relationships, have done the most to strengthen the Israeli economy.

To boycott Nestle would be extremely difficult. You’d have to stop using L’Oreal products. It would mean no more Kit Kats, Baby Ruths, or Butterfingers. No Nesquick or Nescafe’ for breakfast. No sweets or cookies from Libby’s. No Carnation products of any kind. No Buitoni oils, pastas, or sauces. And then there is the bottled water… Arrowhead, Poland Spring, Perrier, San Pellegrino (Perrier’s competitor – LOL), Calistoga (San Pellegrino’s competitor – LOL2), Crystal Geyser, Ice Mountain, Zephyr Hills, Ozarka, Pure Life/Pureza Vital, Deer Park, Aquapod, Nestle’ Brand, and others… Essentially, all bottled water brands are Zionist Israel friendly. And why not, they are selling something that flows freely to a bunch of us nincompoops who pay top dollar for somewhat filtered tapwater!

I could go on, but it would just make you feel more helpless and totally dependent on Zionist and Israel suporting products and services…

…Oh, what the hell!

Here is a short and quite incomplete list:

Porn, ABC, NBC, CBS, FOX, HBO, CNN, MSNBC, Hollywood (all mainstream media, movie, and newspaper outlets), Caterpillar, Est’ee Lauder, Johnson and Johnson, Revlon, Kimberly-Clark (Kleenex and Huggies), Apax Partners (Jonny Rockets, Sunglass Hut), Delta Galil (Barbie, Victoria’s Secret, GAP, Banana Republic, Structure, J. Crew, JC Penny, DKNY, Ralph Lauren, Hugo Boss), Timberland, Siemens, Sara Lee (oh, not the cookies!), The Limited, Nokia, Motorola, AT&T (and most phone companies) Bank of America, Wells Fargo, J.P. Morgan Chase… Oh heck, let’s just say all major banks, shall we? Chevron, BP, Exxon… Ok, I suppose all of the major oil corporations as well – No driving… Hmmm…

And I suppose if I did the research, most pharmaceuticals would be on this list as well, considering Bayer Corporation was imported from the Nazi conglomerate corporation I.G. Farbin – for which the Zionists handed over the Jews to its forced labor camps (not death camps). Oh, does that surprise you? Well… blaming Hitler for all of the bad things of WW2 is like blaming Bush for 9/11… it’s what you are supposed to do so that you don’t see the truth about who really did the dirty deeds. Leaders and presidents are pawns!!!

And how about anything supported by the U.S. Government, the biggest corporation in the world, which whole-heartedly supports Israel no matter what Israel does to terrorize America?

Ha! Boycotting government… Well that’s a game-changer if ever there was one!

The real question is… Are we strong enough as a people to stop participating in the corporate stranglehold that supports death and destruction around the world? Can you grow and cook your own food, drink water from the tap, dig a well, or filter it from a stream, chop down your own trees to build your own house without permits, stop paying taxes that go to support Israel and the Zionist genocide of Palestine , Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and soon to be Iran and Egypt – not to mention the Zionist owned central bank – the Federal Reserve, turn off the porn and go make love to your lover or spouse, and smash your TV and go out into this beautiful world and make your own entertainment?

Well, my best idea is just this… Let’s all boycott these damn Zionists in our government that have our country in a stranglehold. No more paying them taxes, no more citations for disobeying their petty statutes and legalities, no more fines or fees or luxury taxes, no more fraudulent voting on rigged machines, and no more loyalty to the United States Corporation, but instead to the now dead Constitution, just waiting to be reborn in modern glory. Let’s declare sovereignty from the Zionist held U.S. Incorporated. How about that for a boycott!!!

Let’s start by kicking out of the country all unelected “officials” with duel citizenship with America and Israel (but not duel loyalty to American interests). A grand Jury ought to do the trick. That’s right Mr. Raum Emanuel – son of an Israeli terrorist, Obama’s Chief of Staff, and second most powerful man in America – you are on the Zionist shit-list. And then we should review the loyalties and constitutionality of our past and present elected officials, and re-check the voting machines to ensure they got elected honestly, and then dissemble the Dibold company and others like it from the top down. And then we should destroy all voting machines in a glorious celebration of freedom from technological tyranny, making it a recurring yearly holiday, right after the Great Purging Day (the day we purged the Zionists and anyone who supports them from our government and from our land, like so many civilizations and empires before us – no, not a holocaust, just a swift kick in the ass and an advisement to not let the door hit their Zionist butts on their way back to Khazarian Israeli occupied Palestine, or wherever they claim to call home – without weapons and money from America, they’ll be homeless, like their Palestinian victims). And then let’s support Palestine in its efforts to rebuild and re-establish its homeland that we Americans have idly stood by and let our Zionist megalomaniacs in government financially support the stealing of and the genocide of its beautiful peoples, to the tune of more than $10,000 per tax-payer in America! Perhaps Israelis can live in only 9% of the Palestinian land and not travel on Palestinian roads, and see how they like it.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

So why did I write this essay?

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

A few years ago, I went to see Al Gore’s “The Inconvenient Truth” movie, and it had such an impact on my emotional character that the pure rubbish and lies it entailed were completely hidden from my usually logical reasonable disposition. Thus I had went around and recomended this propoganda movie to everyone I knew, stating in hind sight quite emberassing things like, “This is the most important movie ever made…” and “This should be required viewing for everyone, everywhere!” Needless to say, once I came down from my emotionally induced state of  “save the planet” and did a couple of weeks of real research, I kicked myself when I found out that Al Gore was in the carbon trading business as co-founder of his own carbon trading company, that the famous tear-jerking polar bear picture portraying the stranded polar bear on a lone melting little iceberg in what seemed to be the middle of the ocean was in fact a croped picture just a mile or so off shore, and that polar bears can swim over 100 miles without even breaking a sweat, and that the polar bear population had actually grown since the earlier 1900’s from endangered at about 5,000, to well over 25,000 in modern times thanks to real conservation methods over several decades.

And now, as I finish writing this, I realize that this emotionally driven roller-coaster had happened once before in my life, for another movie for which lies and falsified history were rolled up into one powerful propaganda piece that changed my whole outlook on the holocaust, and actually made me sympathetic and accepting to the concept of reparations to Israel and that all whites should be guilty for some insane reason over what the German people supposedly did to the Jews in the holocaust. That movie was the famous “Schindler’s List”.

The true story of Schindler and of his list of 1300 Jews to be “saved” came from his wife, who called Steven Spielberg an all out lair and that his film was “packed with lies.” at a presentation of her autobiographical book, and indicated that her husband Oscar was a selfish, greedy man…

“Spielberg’s film … portrays Oscar as a hero of this century. That is not true. Neither he nor I were heroes. We were just what we were able to be. In war we are all souls without a destiny,”—Emilie Schindler Memoirs

“They say in that book (Keneally’s Schindler’s List) that I gave the Jews the food in their mouths. I never had time to find out who was sick and who had to be fed (by hand). I am no good as a nurse, I tell you frankly. I have no talent for nursing . . . I bought the food for everyone.” —Emilie Schindler

“Schindler was a drunkard. Schindler was a womanizer. His relations with his wife were bad. He often had not one but several girlfriends. Everything he did put him in jeopardy. If Schindler had been a normal man, he would not have done what he did.” —Mosche Bejski, on of the Jews in Schindler’s factory, which he “saved” to be a cheap laborer, and for no other reason.

“THERE WAS NEVER A SCHINDLER’S LIST. It was drawn up by a man called Goldman. This man took money to put a name on that list – no money, no place on the list. I was told this by a Dr Schwartz, in Vienna; he had paid in diamonds to save his wife…” —Emilie Schindler

“Emily Schindler – Memoirs” portrays her husband Osker as a greedy man whose interest in saving Polish Jews from Adolph Hitler’s death camps was to have cheap labor for his factory. She also admits purports that without his factory running, Oskar Schindler would have been drafted to the SS and sent to the front lines. For remember, Schindler was a Nazi, who entertained Nazi’s on a constant basis in his wealthy home. How else do you keep a good thing going but by wining and dining your superiors?

“What matters now is being able to take our people somewhere else, so that we can continue to work,” —Emilie Schindler

Again, the point must be made that no person and no race is above corruption. Only a brave few individuals, of which the Schindler family were not.

“What does he know about my life? Absolutely nothing.” —Emilie Schindler, referring to Spielberg.

“Steven Spielberg only gave me $50,000 for making a film about the Holocaust and my husband, and he never asked me permission, he just did it.”   Emilie Schindler, Drudge, June 1, 1999.

There is so much more information that should be included within this essay, such as the Jewish Zionist President of France Nicolas Sarkozy recently preaching forced diversity, threatening French ethnically European white citizens that if they don’t begin to inter-marry with other races, harsher government action will be required to force it to happen. Nicolas Sarkozy also plans on “giving preference to minorities in job hiring and prosecuting those who do not comply“. In other words, affirmative action (which is neither civil nor equal rights) as a government policy, is being implemented with military-style enforcement from which none are exempt.

And this Zionist fervor is happening all over the world…

Screaming… …they (Jews) control America, no matter which government comes into power, whether Republican or Democratic, whether Barack Obama or George Bush…’ “Their control of America, just like the control of most Western countries, is in the hands of Jewish money and if Jewish money controls their country then you cannot expect anything else.” Fatima Hajaig, Deputy Foreign Minister of South Africa, in a speech at a Palestine solidarity rally. She later appologized, saying she “…meant to say Zionists, not Jews!”

–And now the South African Zionist Lobby and propaganda machine in response…

“There has not been any realistic alternative. Not since the era of pro-Nazi Nationalist MPs more than half a century ago had such statements been made against Jews by a senior (South African) government official.”   Zev Krengel, Jewish board of deputies, in response to the Fatima Hajaig comment. Though true, the comments are dismissed as racism once again, without saying they are untrue!

“The Jewish community is outraged by such a public display of bigotry by a senior government representative. As South African citizens, we cannot allow this kind of comment to be brought into this country.”   Wendy Kahn, Jewish board of deputies, in response to the Fatima Hajaig comment. While never denouncing the comments as untrue, she described the comments as “classic anti-Jewish stereotyping and conspiracy-theory mongering…”, and that comments like these are used by anti-Jewish hate groups to portray Jews as scheming, manipulative and disloyal to the countries in which they lived. But she ‘meant to say Zionist’s!!!


“White genocide” is a term I couldn’t even imagine a few years ago, but is in fact now close to a reality in Africa as chants and songs of killing the “Ama Bhulu” (older tribal term for white dutch settlers) are sung with passion and anger. But the unknown aspect is that the references in these songs and chants are supporting the good communist party and Jewish Zionist Joe Slovo, who posed in pictures with Nelson Mandela under the flag of communism, and who was the main Jewish Zionist anti-Christian and anti-white advocate in South Africa. Of course, most don’t know that Nelson Mandela, despite his hero status and “Peace Prize”, was an avid supporter of terrorist bombings of men, women and children. And while the black citizens in America are trained from birth through the Zionist media and movies to have the opinion that whites do not deserve civil rights, that white is not a color, that the “white devil” is the reason for the plight of American black and Mexican history, and that it is somehow us (blacks) against them (non-blacks), and even while blacks in Africa continue in a tradition of 10,000 years of keeping and selling other blacks as slaves, the American value of human rights and human life – that all men are created equal, regardless of color – seems to have been swept away with the constitution that declared it, and replaced by Zionist ideals of racial ethnic cleansing, perpetual civil war, hate, and genocide.

“South Africa – Black Rage, With Repression – A Challenge For U.S. Policy” —Time Magazine cover.

“…the murder rate of the (white) boer farmers is about 4 times as high as it is for the rest of the population… There is a motive of hatred, that these are hate crimes, that people are tortured… murdered in ways that are dehumanizing.”Dr. Gregory Stanton, President of Genocide Watch.

Over 35,000 whites, many farmers in South Africa, have been murdered in what is being eluded to by many as a “white genocide”. But these white Christians are not just being murdered, but mutilated, raped, tortured, chopped up, tied up, torn to pieces, and killed in the most horrific of ways… not coincidentally, just like in a “Jewish Torture Porn”.

“Genocide Watch does not believe that South Africa has reached the stage of actual genocide (stage 7 on our 8 stage scale.)  We believe that hate crimes against whites, particularly Boer farmers, place South Africa at Stage 5, the “Polarization” stage that precedes genocide.  Many situations of polarization do not finally result in genocide if preventive steps are taken to stop the genocidal process. However, we are concerned that if recent racist statements to “kill the Boer” by the President of the African National Congress Youth League, Julius Malema, are not repudiated by top ANC leaders, and if he is not disciplined and blocked in his intention to increase his power, the situation in South Africa will worsen, and Genocide Watch will raise the warning level to Stage 6, Preparation for genocide.” —Genocide Watch, May 2010, Dr. Gregory Stanton, President of Genocide Watch. Julius Malema was charged with hate crimes in march, 2010.

At one time in the south African cities built by the white “Boers”, millions of black African’s came for jobs, education, hospitals, and other services, with only a 5% unemployment rate for blacks, better rates than the United States. But then in 1994, the African National Congress (ANC) became South Africa’s governing left-wing, non-racial democracy party, supported by its unholy trinitiy of a Zionist alliance with the Congress of South African Trade Unions (COSATU) and the SOUTH AFRICAN COMMUNIST PARTY (SACP). The African National Congress became the ANC in 1923 and formed a military wing, the Umkhonto we Sizwe (Spear of the Nation) in 1961. The ANC is a member of Socialist International, a worldwide organization of democratic socialist, social democratic, socialist, and labour political parties (remember, all isms are communism, and democracy is part of the communist platform). It was formed in 1951, with Zionist Joe Slovo as chief of staff. Before the ANC took over in 1994, South Africa was one of the safest nations in Africa for blacks and whites. Now it is the murder and rape capital of the world, with 50% unemployment rates.

Apartheid fell in grand world celebration by people and cultures who had no idea what they were celebrating – the poisonous Zionist stake through the heart of South Africa people and leaders. But in the same year that Apartheid fell, the genocide of over 800,000 Tutsi’s in Rwanda by the Hutu’s began. Black ethnic (black on black) genocides then began all over the continent, in Ethiopia, Zimbabwe, Chad, Congo, Somalia, Angola, Liberia, Botswana, Mali, Mozambique, and many others…

Over and over, the once stable countries of the world have become subject to Zionist communist ideals, hate and subversion branded as democracy. And with the United States being used as the military arm to do the bidding of these Zionist elite, any nation is susceptible to having a new government forced down its throat, while American citizens are made to believe that this is just “democracy at work”. Terrorism works well as a tool for democracy.

One last bit of information, that I’ve always wanted for women to know…

“Common sense tells us that the only way to increase the value of diamonds is to make them scarce, that is to reduce production.” —Cecil Rhodes, founder of De Beers Mining, who received funding and for which De Beers is now owned by the founding Zionist ROTHSCHILD FAMILY.

“Our only risk is the sudden discovery of new mines, which human nature will work recklessly to the detriment of us all.” —Cecil Rhodes, founder of De Beers Mining

Now, to translate these statements for those who are blinded by the diamond’s sparkle… diamonds are in fact almost worthless as precious jewelry, and are in fact so damn prevalent in Africa as to make them all but valueless. Precious simply means the same as rare. And diamonds are about as rare as coal! The diamond business is a scam, and good ol’ Cecil Rhodes knew this all too well in his diamond monopoly, and the villainous Rothschild dynasty has kept that myth going to this day in a multi-billion dollar industry based on a big fat lie. And that diamond you may have on your finger or around your neck, or just sitting in a dark jewelry box somewhere… that literal “rock” was mined with the blood of Africans, who are exploited as extremely cheap labor by these Zionist tyrants and corporations, and you paid a mark-up price of about 60,000%.

LOL! I hope your “status in society” (jackass) was worth every greedy penny.

Imagine the amount of hungry North-Africans (and for that matter Americans!) that could have been feed with that Zionist blood money you spent on your diamonds.

Simply put, a grand awakening must happen now, or else this world will fall completely into the hands of this tiny, minuscule minority of evil, warmongering, genocidal people, who by their own writings and words – for which you’ve just read – claim to be the chosen masters of us all, and we… their cattle. This is not a racial issue, for we are not dealing with a race. We are dealing with the wealthy elite and the brainwashed fools who support and follow them.

Good and holy Jews are welcome in my home and in my heart and in my country for all eternity, with freedom of religion and in pursuit life, liberty, and happiness… however, usury does not and should not have a place anywhere.

Now, I have no doubt that I will hence forth be called by some an anti-Semite for trying to expose this information, despite the fact that the majority of these statements weren’t even my words, but were said by those who falsely claim to be “Semites”. And if you’ve gotten to this point of the story, I hope that you can now comprehend the ridiculousness of this emotionally driven, false racial anti-Semite labeling in lieu of logical discourse. But you know what? That anti-Semite label suddenly seems so much lighter to bear than letting these Zionist bankers (including the Federal Reserve) rip apart our economy and purposefully induce the greatest grand depression ever imaginable onto this country and onto the world, by continuing to steal all of our wealth and productivity, as well as our pride, our morals, and our values.

I hope that you might feel the same way… for inaction will allow this darkness to dominate any light left.

Violence is not the answer, and it never will be. Peaceful non-compliance with an unlawful American government full of citizens of Israel – and the boycott of corporate Zionist products and services is the answer. The term “buy American” must be reinvigorated, the Libertarian ideals of limited government and constitutional virtue, and civics, morals, and values must be re-introduced into an infrastructure and business structure that has been overtaken by greed and usury.

May all of humanity (the only real “race”) one day live in peace, without this supremacist Zionist foe or any other elitist or monetary enslavement as threats.

Please… play this forward…

Please see part 2 of this essay here: http://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2010/08/29/zionism-101-the-zionist-israeli-government-of-the-united-states-of-amerika/

.

Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)

Monday, June 7, 2010


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Bonus:

Who’s Jew in the Obama Cabinet (past and present)?

An incomplete list…

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

 

Rahm Emanuel - White House Chief of Staff; son of a Zionist terrorist; dual-citizen of Israel and America (Emanuel served in Israel’s military during the First Gulf War instead of the U.S. military)

Joe Biden – A self-proclaimed Zionist, Biden stated about Iran, “Israel can determine for itself—it’s a sovereign nation—what’s in their interest and what they decide to do relative to Iran and anyone else.”

Ron Klain – Chief of Staff to the Vice President

Mona Sutphen – Deputy White House Chief of Staff; 2nd behind Rahm Emanuel

David Axelrod – Special Adviser to the President

Tim Geithner – Treasury Secretary, former President of the New York Fed

Paul Volcker – Chair of Obama’s Economic Recovery Advisory Board (and former Chairman of the Fed)

Lawrence (Larry) Summers (Samuelson) – Director of the White House National Economic Council, Wall Street executive, and World Banker… no conflict of interest here, eh?

Jared Bernstein – Chief Economist and Economic Policy Adviser to the Vice President

Gary Gensler – Chair of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Elena Kagan – Solicitor General of the United States, Department of Justice – and Obama’s new Supreme Court Nominee

Sally Katzen – Major legal adviser to Obama-Biden

Eric Lander and Harold E. Varmus – Co-Chairs of the President’s Council of Advisers on Science/Technology

Ellen Moran – White House Director of Communications… which is why we don’t communicate!

Peter Orszag – Director of the Office of Management and Budget

Penny Pritzker – Obama’s National Finance Chair during election, billionare of the Chicago crime boss family, the Pritzkers

Robert Reich – Economic adviser to Obama-Biden

Dennis Ross – Obama’s Ambassador-At-Large in the (entire) Middle East, Obama’s “top envoy” (so a Zionist Jew is in charge of the Arab/Israeli Conflict)

Robert Rubin – Economic adviser to Obama-Biden, former Treasury Secretary, and ultra-greedy Wall Street crook.

Daniel B. Shapiro – Head of the Middle East Desk at the National Security Council (another Jew involved in foreign policy matters involving the Middle East); also a major Washington lobbyist

Mary Schapiro – Chair of the Securities and Exchange Commission, served in every Presidential administration since Reagan, also an executive for Duke Energy and Kraft Foods  meaning she regulates Wall Street as a Wall Street executive (what ever happened to conflicts of interest?)

Barney Frank - Chairman, United States House Committee on Financial Services

Phil Schiliro – Assistant to the President for Legislative Affairs, also Henry Waxman’s long-time Chief of Staff

Neal Wolin – Deputy Secretary, U.S. Treasury Department

Lael Brainard – Under Secretary, U.S. Treasury Department

Richard C. Holbrooke - Special Envoy to Pakistan/Afghanistan

Stuart Levey - Under Secretary for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence

Jason Furman - Deputy Director, Office of Management and Budget

Jeffrey Zeints - Chief Performance Officer to streamline government and cut costs as well as Deputy Director for Management at the Office of Management and Budget

Sheila Bair - Chairman, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Karen Mills - Administrator, Small Business Administration

Jon Leibowitz - Chairman, Federal Trade Commission

Douglas H. Shulman - Commissioner, Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

Neil M. Barofsky - Office of the Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program (SIGTARP)

James B. Steinberg - Deputy Secretary of State, second in rank only to Hillary Clinton in foreign policy matters

Jacob Lew - Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources, second in rank only to Hillary Clinton in foreign policy matters

Jeffrey D. - Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs (Includes Mideast)

Lee Feinstein - Foreign Policy Advisor

Eric Lynn - Middle East Policy Advisor (again, a Zionist Jew advising on Arab affairs?)

Dennis Ross - Special Advisor for the Gulf (Iran) and Southwest Asia to the Secretary of State

Steven L. Rattner - Director, Presidential Task Force on the Auto Industry

Kenneth R. Feinberg – Special Master for Compensation, U.S. Treasury Department

Mara Rudman - Foreign Policy Advisor

Julius Genachowski - Chair, Federal Communications Commission

Dr. Margaret Hamburg - Commissioner, Food and Drug Administration

Dr. Joshua Sharfstein - Deputy Commissioner, Food and Drug Administration

Susan Sher - Chief of Staff for First Lady Michelle Obama

Dr. Thomas R. Frieden - Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Neal S. Wolin - Deputy Secretary of the Treasury

Michael S. Barr – Assistant Secretary for Financial Institutions

David S. Cohen - Assistant Secretary for Terrorist Financing

Christina D. Romer (white) – Married to Jewish husband David H. Romer, Chairman, Council of Economic Advisers

Budget and Financial – no wonder these are so screwed up!

Douglas W. Elmendorf - Director, Congressional Budget Office (CBO)

Jon D. Leibowitz – Chairman, Federal Trade Commission (FTC)

Sheila C. Bair – Chairman, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)

John E. Bowman – Director, Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS)

Karen G. Mills - Administrator, Small Business Administration (SBA)

Mary L. Schapiro - Chairman, Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)

Gary G. Gensler - Chairman, Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)

Daniel J. Roth – President and Chief Executive Officer, National Futures Association (NFA)

Market ManipulatorsA small list of the corporateers and regulators who don’t regulate them -

Duncan L. Niederauer - Chief Executive Officer & Director, NYSE Euronext

Robert Greifeld - Chief Executive Officer, NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc.

Lloyd C. Blankfein - Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.

Robert B. Zoellick – President, The World Bank

Stephen Roach -Manageing Director and Economist of Morgan Stanley

Martin Feldstein – Director of American International Group (AIG)

Alan Fishman - CEO of Washington Mutual

George Soros – Major player in all things, Quantum (hedge) Fund

Treasury Department – under (but who control) Secretary Timothy Geithner

Matthew Kabaker – Deputy Assistant Secretary, Counselor to the Secretary

Lewis Alexander – Counselor to the Secretary

Lee Sachs - Counselor to the Secretary

Jake Siewert - Counselor to the Secretary

Gene Sperling – Counselor to the Secretary

Federal Reserve Board of Governors

Ben Shalom Bernanke - Chairman

Donald L. Kohn - Vice Chairman

Kevin M. Warsh – Married to Jewish wife Jane Lauder

Jewish Federal Reserve District Bank Presidents:

Eric S. Rosengren - President, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston

Charles I. Plosser - President, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia

Jeffrey M. Lacker - President, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond

James B. Bullard - President, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Gary H. Stern - President, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis

Thomas M. Hoenig - President, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City

Richard W. Fisher - President, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas

Janet L. Yellen - President, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco

Obama Czars, illegally appointed officials with power over congress –

Economic Czar – Larry Summers

Regulatory Czar – Cass Sunstein

Pay Czar – Kenneth Feinberg

Guantanomo/Military Czar – Daniel Fried

Car Czar - Steven Rattner

Border Czar - Alan Bersin

Climate Czar - Todd Stern

Global Warming Czar - Carol Browner – Socialist International, that advocates “global governance.” Not Jewish, but very supportive of Zionist and communist/socialist ideals.

…?

And the list goes on and on and on and on…

 

Please see part 2 of this essay here: http://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2010/08/29/zionism-101-the-zionist-israeli-government-of-the-united-states-of-amerika/

Who Owns America?


Nothing is as it seems…

Somehow, we have all been conditioned to believe that what once was shall always be. We believe that we are a free people, guaranteed our God-given rights declared in the constitution. We believe that when we vote, we are electing representatives of we the people, whom once elected become public servants. We believe that the house in which we live and the land on which we settle is our land, free and clear of our government’s tentacles. And we believe that the laws for which we allow ourselves to be governed by come from a legitimate law making body, with checks and balances and constitutional oversights.

But what if the above perceptions are in fact false?

And what if the reality is that the United States doesn’t even exist at all?

What indeed…

According to Executive Order 12803, signed by George H.W. Bush in 1992, The District Of Columbia – Washington D.C. (neither a state nor a part of the United States) was given the authority to privatize most or all of the infrastructure within the United States. This means that the federal government, or the corporation that acts in lieu of a federal government, can sell any city’s “assets” which were built with tax-payer monies including:

· Roads
· Tunnels
· Bridges
· Electricity supply facilities
· Mass transit
· Rail transportation
· Airports
· Ports
· Waterways
· Recycling/wastewater treatment facilities
· Solid waste disposal facilities
· Hospitals
· Prisons
· Schools
· Housing

E.O. 12803 lists the above as examples of America’s salable and/or lease-able infrastructure. But this is not to be taken as a complete list, as these are just some examples.

E.O. 12803 names this authority in its destructive pages as “Infrastructure Privatization” and states that this power allows for the “…disposition or transfer of an infrastructure “asset” such as by sale or by long-term lease from a State or local government to a private party.

In a previous blog article, I compared the 10 planks of the Communist Manifesto with various Executive Orders, Presidential Directives, Acts of Congress, and other legislation which, under a declared state of emergency (martial law) would put the very items listed above under immediate government control, ensuring the continuity of government (corporate rule). Read here: http://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2010/04/25/the-united-states-communist-manifesto/

If we then understand that America’s infrastructure has now been available for sale to foreign nations for 18 years, when E.O. 12803 was signed into law by the treasonous Bush family cartel, we might then get a picture of why everything seems to be getting so expensive and corrupt.

No longer should we be asking why our phone, electric, gas, water, sewage, waste management, tollways, parking meters, public transit, hospital bills, and general operating budgets keep going up-up-up in price… What we should be asking is who owns these once public utilities?

Is it possible that China owns the sewers? Can Mexico actually own our tollways and roads. Is Russia the proud new owner of Nevada?

These are the questions we should be asking…

And when one considers that “Housing” is one of the listed “assets” in the government’s list of examples, one must then ask whether the continued accounts of foreign troops practicing martial law drills across the country might be construed as foreign troops practicing takeover of the land for which they now own. After all, the real estate industry has recently been privatized into government hands. Is it not reasonable to assume that our “housing” includes the land for which those houses call home? And, knowing that your title or deed (you should read yours, especially the small print) states that you do not own the land or home you live in, that you are the tenant, and that it can be taken at any time by the corporate government through eminent domain for any reason, one must ask what will happen when China wants to claim the land for which it has purchased or been given in payment of the national debt.

Are Mexicans illegal immigrants if they are living on Mexico’s land purchased from under our noses through government deed? Could the push in recent years for a multi-cultural mindset and global population in the United States simply be to acclimatize us for the reality of America’s sale and eventual take-over from these foreign entities?

We know that many of our interstates and roadways are already sold. We know that they are part of the N.A.F.T.A. system of inter-continental transport controlled through United Nations sanctions. And we know that Mexico gets tolls that are paid in the United States. So, if these roads are no longer in the public trust, instead being held by private corporations or foreign countries, where do our taxes go that have historically paid for the building and maintenance of this infrastructure? Are we paying taxes for not? Or are we giving our money to non-governmental and foreign corporations?

Why doesn’t the government actually fix the health-care system and start enforcing the safety regulations that supposedly apply to the health-care industry? Perhaps these hospitals aren’t on American soil anymore. Or perhaps the whole codified system of rules and legalities don’t mean a hill of beans. And isn’t it amazing and suspicious that most of our hospitals are packed full of foreign doctors?

Private prisons are plentiful, many owned by Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg, Brown and Root (KBR). Old Dick Cheney must be so proud of his legacy of the privatized prison labor business. And with more than 1% of our population in prison, business is booming. But how does one know if one is still in an American prison, with all of the rights and protections accorded thereof? Is rendition simply taking an American citizen to a foreign-owned prison on foreign land inside of America? So many questions can be answered by applying this Executive Order to the equation…

And finally, are our public schools being sold off to the highest bidder? This should frighten anyone with any sense of behavioral modification and the early childhood educational programing that takes place in our schools today. Considering the multi-cultural bias in most and the allowance of Spanish as a first language in some schools, we good little citizens must pause and wonder if our natural-born children aren’t indeed attending a foreign school in the middle of America!

These are scary thoughts indeed. But we should be asking these questions, and demanding answers for them. For at this point, if it is true that the United States of America ceased to exist long ago, then we have no legitimate government. We are in actuallity living in a fictitious corporate state opperating under the illusion of freedom and democracy, with no constitution in sight. Our independence is gone, as is our sovereignty. We are a people with no homeland. We have been sold out by our “trusted leaders”.

In reality, the international banks and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) is our government.

Here are a few other facts about the United States, referenced and stated simply. Check them yourself. And for more intense reading on these subjects, go here: http://www.civil-liberties.com/books/index.html

The following list was copied from here: http://home.iae.nl/users/lightnet/world/essays.htm

1. The IRS is not a U.S. Government Agency. It is an Agency of the IMF. (Diversified Metal Products v. IRS et al. CV-93-405E-EJE U.S.D.C.D.I., Public Law 94-564, Senate Report 94-1148 pg. 5967, Reorganization Plan No. 26, Public Law 102-391.)

2. The IMF is an Agency of the UN. (Blacks Law Dictionary 6th Ed. Pg. 816)

3. The U.S. Has not had a Treasury since 1921. (41 Stat. Ch.214 pg. 654)

4. The U.S. Treasury is now the IMF. (Presidential Documents Volume 29-No.4 pg. 113, 22 U.S.C. 285-288)

5. The United States does not have any employees because there is no longer a United States. No more reorganizations. After over 200 years of operating under bankruptcy its finally over. (Executive Order 12803) Do not personate one of the creditors or share holders or you will go to Prison.18 U.S.C. 914

6. The FCC, CIA, FBI, NASA and all of the other alphabet gangs were never part of the United States government. Even though the “US Government” held shares of stock in the various Agencies. (U.S. V. Strang, 254 US 491, Lewis v. US, 680 F.2d, 1239)

7. Social Security Numbers are issued by the UN through the IMF. The Application for a Social Security Number is the SS5 form. The Department of the Treasury (IMF) issues the SS5 not the Social Security Administration. The new SS5 forms do not state who or what publishes them, the earlier SS5 forms state that they are Department of the Treasury forms. You can get a copy of the SS5 you filled out by sending form SSA-L996 to the SS Administration. (20 CFR chapter 111, subpart B 422.103 (b) (2) (2) Read the cites above)

8. There are no Judicial courts in America and there has not been since 1789. Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statutes and Codes. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428, 1 Stat. 138-178)

9. There have not been any Judges in America since 1789. There have just been Administrators. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428 1Stat. 138-178) 10. According to the GATT you must have a Social Security number. House Report (103-826)

11. We have One World Government, One World Law and a One World Monetary System. (Get the Disks)

12. The UN is a One World Super Government. (Get the Disks)

13. No one on this planet has ever been free. This planet is a Slave Colony. There has always been a One World Government. It is just that now it is much better organized and has changed its name as of 1945 to the United Nations. (Get the Disks)

14. New York City is defined in the Federal Regulations as the United Nations. Rudolph Gulliani stated on C-Span that “New York City was the capital of the World” and he was correct. (20 CFR chapter 111, subpart B 422.103 (b) (2) (2)

15. Social Security is not insurance or a contract, nor is there a Trust Fund. (Helvering v. Davis 301 US 619, Steward Co. V. Davis 301 US 548.)

16. Your Social Security check comes directly from the IMF which is an Agency of the UN. (Look at it if you receive one. It should have written on the top left United States Treasury.)

17. You own no property, slaves can’t own property. Read the Deed to the property that you think is yours. You are listed as a Tenant. (Senate Document 43, 73rd Congress 1st Session)

18. The most powerful court in America is not the United States Supreme Court but, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. (42 Pa.C.S.A. 502)

19. The Revolutionary War was a fraud. See (22, 23 and 24) 20. The King of England financially backed both sides of the Revolutionary war. (Treaty at Versailles July 16, 1782, Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80)

21. You can not use the Constitution to defend yourself because you are not a party to it. (Padelford Fay & Co. v. The Mayor and Alderman of The City of Savannah 14 Georgia 438, 520)

22. America is a British Colony. (THE UNITED STATES IS A CORPORATION, NOT A LAND MASS AND IT EXISTED BEFORE THE REVOLUTIONARY WAR AND THE BRITISH TROOPS DID NOT LEAVE UNTIL 1796.) Respublica v. Sweers 1 Dallas 43, Treaty of Commerce 8 Stat 116, The Society for Propagating the Gospel, &c. V. New Haven 8 Wheat 464, Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80, IRS Publication 6209, Articles of Association October 20, 1774.)

23. Britain is owned by the Vatican. (Treaty of 1213)

24. The Pope can abolish any law in the United States. (Elements of Ecclesiastical Law Vol.1 53-54)

25. A 1040 form is for tribute paid to Britain. (IRS Publication 6209)

26. The Pope claims to own the entire planet through the laws of conquest and discovery. (Papal Bulls of 1455 and 1493)

27. The Pope has ordered the genocide and enslavement of millions of people.(Papal Bulls of 1455 and 1493)

28. The Popes laws are obligatory on everyone. (Bened. XIV., De Syn. Dioec, lib, ix., c. vii., n. 4. Prati, 1844)(Syllabus, prop 28, 29, 44)

29. We are slaves and own absolutely nothing not even what we think are our children.(Tillman v. Roberts 108 So. 62, Van Koten v. Van Koten 154 N.E. 146, Senate Document 43 & 73rd Congress 1st Session, Wynehammer v. People 13 N.Y. REP 378, 481)

30. Military Dictator George Washington divided the States (Estates) into Districts. (Messages and papers of the Presidents Vo 1, pg. 99. Webster’s 1828 dictionary for definition of Estate.)

31.” The People” does not include you and me. (Barron v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore. 32 U.S. 243)

32. The United States Government was not founded upon Christianity. (Treaty of Tripoli 8 Stat 154.)

33. It is not the duty of the police to protect you. Their job is to protect the Corporation and arrest code breakers. Sapp v. Tallahasee, 348 So. 2nd. 363, Reiff v. City of Philadelphia, 477 F.Supp. 1262, Lynch v. N.C. Dept of Justice 376 S.E. 2nd. 247.

34. Everything in the “United States” is For Sale: roads, bridges, schools, hospitals, water, prisons airports etc. I wonder who bought Klamath lake. Did anyone take the time to check? (Executive Order 12803)

35. We are Human capital. (Executive Order 13037)

36. The UN has financed the operations of the United States government for over 50 years and now owns every man, women and child in America. The UN also holds all of the Land in America in Fee Simple. (Get the Disks for the Essay and Documents.)

37. The good news is we don’t have to fulfill “our” fictitious obligations. You can discharge a fictitious obligation with another’s fictitious obligation. (Get the Disks)

38. The depression and World War II were a total farce. The United States and various other companies were making loans to others all over the World during the Depression. The building of Germanys infrastructure in the 1930’s including the Railroads was financed by the United States. That way those who call themselves “Kings,” “Prime Ministers,” and “Furor.”etc could sit back and play a game of chess using real people. Think of all of the Americans, Germans etc. who gave their lives thinking they were defending their Countries which didn’t even exist. The millions of innocent people who died for nothing. Isn’t it obvious why Switzerland is never involved in these fiascoes? That is where the “Bank of International Settlements” is located.Wars are manufactured to keep your eye off the ball. You have to have an enemy to keep the illusion of “Government” in place. (Get the Disks and see the Documents for yourself.)

39. The “United States” did not declare Independence from Great Britain or King George. (Get the Disks for Documents and Essay.)

40. Guess who owns the UN? The disks have many more cites including Hundreds of Documents to verify the 40 statements above and numerous other facts. The Disks also include numerous Essays written by Stephen Ames and several other people that fully explain the 40 above mentioned facts. The Disks will clear up any confusion and answer any questions that you may have. The cites listed above are only the tip of the iceberg. Also included on the Disks are several hundred legal definitions because without them it is next to impossible for the non-lawyer to understand many of the Documents. Simple words such as “person” “citizen” “people” “or” “nation” “crime” “charge” “right” “statute” “preferred” “prefer” “constitutor” “creditor” “debtor” “debit” “discharge” “payment” ‘law” “United States” etc, do not mean what most of us think because we were never taught the legal definitions of the proceeding words. The illusion is much larger than what is cited above.

There is no use in asking an Attorney about any of the above because: “His first duty is to the courts…not to the client.” U.S.v Franks D.C.N.J. 53F.2d 128. “Clients are also called “wards of the court” in regard to their relationship with their attorneys.”Spilker v. Hansin, 158 F.2d 35, 58U.S.App.D.C. 206. Wards of court. Infants and persons of unsound mind. Davis Committee v. Lonny, 290 Ky. 644, 162 S.W.2d 189, 190. Did you get that? An Attorneys first duty is not to you and when you have an Attorney you are either considered insane or an infant.

Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
Sunday, May 9, 2010

The United States Communist Manifesto


The Communist Manifesto is a desired description of the government (corporate) control of a society, and for that mater the world, written by Mr. Karl Marx in 1848.

Karl Marx describes in his communist manifesto, the ten steps necessary to destroy a free enterprise system and replace it with a system of omnipotent government power, so as to effect a communist socialist state. Those ten steps are known as the Ten Planks of The Communist Manifesto…

Karl Marx designed these planks as a test to determine whether a society has become communist or not.

As if to give credence to these 10 pillars of a society completely controlled by the State (communism), past and present presidents of the United States Corporation have and continue to pass presidential directives, which bring these planks of communist doctrine to reality… in the state of a declared emergency. While these “directives” scared me before, the realization that they coincide so perfectly with the communist/fascist doctrine of Marx brings this to a whole new level.

These “10 Planks” written in the Communist Manifesto are listed in blue below. Underneath each “plank” is the Presidential Directives, Executive Orders, congressional acts, constitutional amendment, etc. that has made each plank of the Communist Manifesto into law. This is not good.

.

- Executive Order 12919 - The president would put the United States under total martial law and military dictatorship, in case of a declared emergency.


≈–1–≈

1) Abolition of private property. Abolition of private property and the application of all rents of land to public purposes.

- The Patriot Act - Allows law enforcement to conduct warrentless searches of your records and place of residence, and to confiscate your personal property without your knowledge or consent.


≈–2–≈

2) The income tax. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.

- The Emergency Banking Act – President Roosevelt declared the United States Federal Government dissolved by being bankrupt and insolvent.

- House Joint Resolution 192, 73rd Congress –  Suspended The Gold Standard and Abrogated The Gold Clause. Dissolved the Sovereign Authority of the United States and the official capacities of all United States Governmental Offices, Officers, and Departments.

- Sixteenth Amendment (Amendment XVI) – Allows the Congress to unconstitutionally levy an income tax without apportioning it among the states or basing it on census results. “The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.”


≈–3–≈

3) Abolition of estate. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.

- Probate Laws and Taxes - The application of estate tax, property tax, and the limiting of and reassigning of property values, as well as other state and federal taxes are all aspects of this. Also, you do not own the property in which you live nor the land it sits upon. You are permitted through contract (title/deed) with the State to occupy said dwelling. It can be taken away at any time through eminent domain, or through bank contract if a loan is defaulted upon. Read your title and deed and these facts will become apparent.


≈–4–≈

4) Confiscation of property. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.

- Executive Order 10998 – Allows the government to seize all means of transportation, including personal cars, trucks, and vehicles of any kind.

- Executive Order 11310 – Grants authority to the Department of Justice to enforce the plans set out in Executive Orders, to institute industrial support, to establish judicial and legislative liaison, to control all aliens, to operate penal and correctional institutions, and to advise and assist the President.

- Eminent Domain – The inherent power of the State to seize a citizen’s private property, expropriate property, or seize a citizen’s rights in property with due monetary compensation, but without the owner’s consent. The property is taken either for government use or by delegation to third parties (corporations) who will devote it to public or civic use or, in some cases, economic development. The exercise of eminent domain is not limited to real property. Governments may also condemn (exercise power of eminent domain to transfer title to the property from its private owner to the government) personal property, such as supplies for the military in wartime or franchises. Governments can even condemn intangible property such as contract rights, patents, trade secrets, and copyrights.

- International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) - A UNITED STATES Federal Law allowing U.S. presidents  to identify any unusual extraordinary threat that originates outside the UNITED STATES and to confiscate property and prohibit transactions in response. In the UNITED STATES CODE  the IEEPA is TITLE 50, SECTIONs 1701-1707. Enables the President to seize the property of a foreign country or national. These powers were transferred to FEMA in a sweeping consolidation in 1979.

- National Security Presidential Directive (NSPD) 51 – Allows the president to control and coordinate all three brances of government (to become king) in the event of a “catastrophic emergency”. Thus, no judicial review or jury trial will be available, thus property disputes will be squashed by the king or his minions.

- The Military Commissions Act - Strips the courts of jurisdiction to hear or consider habeas corpus appeals of anyone held in U.S. Custody as an “unlawful enemy combatant” or “rebels”. Also prohibits any person from invoking the Geneva Conventions or their protocols as a source of rights in any action in a U.S. court.


≈–5–≈

5) A central bank. Centralization of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.

- Executive Order 11921 – Allows the Federal Emergency Preparedness Agency to take control of all financial institutions in the United States, and allows government to control the mechanisms of production and distribution of energy sources.

- Federal Reserve ActAct of Congress that created the Federal Reserve System, the central banking system of the United States of America, which was signed into law by President Woodrow Wilson.


≈–6–≈

6) Government control of communications and transportation. Centralization of the means of communications and transportation in the hands of the State.

- Executive Order 10990 - Allows government to take over all modes of transportation and control of highways and seaports.

- Executive Order 10995 – Allows government to seize and control all communications media (telecommunications, internet, radio, television, etc…)

- Executive Order 10997 – allows the government to take over all electrical power, gas, petroleum, fuels, and minerals.

- Executive Order 11002 – Allows the government to take over all airports and aircraft, including commercial aircraft.

- Act of August 29, 1916 - Authorizes the Secretary of the Army, in time of war, to take possession of any transportation system for transporting troops, material, or any other purpose related to the emergency.


≈–7–≈

7) Government ownership of factories, land, and agriculture. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the state, the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.

- Executive Order 10999 – Allows the government to take over all food resources and farms.

- Executive Order 11005 – Allows the government to take over railroads, inland waterways, and public storage facilities… public or private.

- 1950 Defense Production Act - Gives the President sweeping powers over all aspects of the economy.

≈–8–≈

8) Government control of labor - creation of government labor armies. Equal liability of all to labor. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.

- Executive Order 11000 – Allows the government to mobilize citizens into work brigades under government supervision.

- H.R. 3590: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Obama-Care), page 1312, SEC. 5210. ESTABLISHING A READY RESERVE CORPS, and SEC. 203. COMMISSIONED CORPS AND READY RESERVE CORPS – Establishment of a commissioned Regular Corps and a Ready Reserve Corps for service in time of national emergency. The purpose of the Ready Reserve Corps is to fulfill the need to have additional Commissioned Corps personnel available on short notice (similar to the uniformed service’s reserve program) to assist regular Commissioned Corps personnel to meet both routine public health and emergency response missions. The Ready Reserve Corps shall participate in routine training to meet the general and specific needs of the Commissioned Corps be available and ready for involuntary calls to active duty during national emergencies and public health crises, similar to the uniformed service reserve personnel, be available for back-filling critical positions left vacant during deployment of active duty Commissioned Corps members, as well as for deployment to respond to public health emergencies, both foreign and domestic; and be available for service assignment in isolated, hardship, and medically under-served communities (as defined in section 399SS) to improve access to health services. Commissioned officers of the Ready Reserve Corps shall be appointed by the President and commissioned officers of the Regular Corps shall be appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate. Effective on the date of enactment of the Affordable Health Choices Act, all individuals classified as officers in the Reserve Corps under this section (as such section existed on the day before the date of enactment of such Act) and serving on active duty shall be deemed to be commissioned officers of the Regular Corps. So those “Commissioned Officers  personally appointed by Barack Obama without advice and consent of the Senate automatically become a part of the Regular Corps. Translation: a presidential army, which will most likely not be bound by any oath to the constitution, but may be bound by an oath to the president.


≈–9–≈

9) Corporate farms and regional planning. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries, gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country by a more equitable distribution of population over the country. Note: This is a part of Agenda 21…

- Executive Order 11002 – Designates the Postmaster General to operate a national registration of all persons.

- Executive Order 11004 – Allows the Housing and Finance Authority to relocate communities, build new housing with public funds, to designate public lands and areas to be abandoned, and to establish new locations for populations.

- National Security Act of 1947 - Allows for the strategic relocation of industries, services, government and other essential economic activities, and to rationalize the requirements for manpower, resources and production facilities.


≈–10–≈

10) Government control of education. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children’s factory labor in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production.

- Executive Order 11001 – Allows the government to take over all health, education, and welfare functions.

- Mandatory Government Education - Public education is schooling mandated for or offered to all children by the government, whether national, regional, or local, provided by an institution of civil government, and paid for, in whole or in part, by taxes. The State of Massachusetts enacted mandatory government sponsored education in 1852. Mississippi was the last state to enact a compulsory attendance law In 1918. Public education involves compulsory student attendance until a certain age or standard is achieved, government certification of teachers and curricula to ensure learning structure and materials are State approved, and government testing and standards for citizens, to ensure indoctrination-like education into the system of debt-enslavement and ignorance of corporate government and actual history is achieved. Homeschooling is now demonized, and has even been made illegal in some states.


.

.

One “event” is all it will take, real or false-flag.

And a national emergency will be declared.

Obama will become king, overseen and controled by an oligarchy of elites.

Be afraid… be very afraid!

.

.

Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)

Sunday, April 25, 2010


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,342 other followers