Clint Interviewed For Common Sense Summit 2021


Many of you know my past experience with conferences. You know my experienced-based opinion (and have now seen the results) of what commercializing any sincere movement does and the cult of personalities it forms. And you know that I am very cautious about just whom I will allow my good name to be associated with after all these years.

To those that attended the so-called “Free Your Mind” conference with me, you know first hand what this type of barely organized bread and circus event amounts to, from professional shills to parroting, unwitting liars to way-out-there hippies peddling energy crystals and 5G protective moonrocks. And you know that I’ve not only openly called out the “organizers” of these for-profit alternative commerce-fests, but also sought out the ultimate question in parting – how can I possibly free my mind inside a coldly partitioned, fancy Hilton hotel conference room? And the answer, unwaveringly, is that we can’t. And we never will.

What you also know about me is that I’m no salesman. But in this case, it turns out, that’s a good thing…

For here I find myself in the midst of it again, though this time wittingly participating in a different kind of conference, one that is online and even FREE to watch for a short time. Clyde Cleveland’s Common Sense Summit main page has this to say about its organization and style:

–=–

What is The Common Sense Summit? – The 5-day digital event consists of 48+ world-class experts in the field of patriotism who are sharing their inside secrets, tactics, and strategies on finding solutions that you can use today to restore your freedoms and basic human rights. The Common Sense Summit is an online virtual event you attend from any location using any device when your schedule permits. Our expert interviews and presentations are available for free on the day they launch for the summit to anyone who has claimed their free pass. Access links are emailed each day of the summit for the presentations going live that day.

Link: https://commonsensesummit.com

–=–

For the list of speakers, including myself, please visit the website and sign up for either the free viewing or take your time with a paid pass. Putting on this type of conference is not easy, and the line-up certainly appears like something worth the price, Clyde being an excellent host.

And so I am inviting you to attend, from the comfort of your own home. My personal interview will not be seen anywhere else, and I will not be posting it out of respect. Clyde Cleveland, a gentleman I have respect for in his efforts, invited me to my surprise into this fold, a cornucopia of famous and infamously eclectic speakers, a series of short interviews that is sure to be interesting. Most importantly, for my high standards, we can read this caveat:

–=–

BUILT LIKE A COURSE – Enhanced Education – It’s our process of creating online events that resemble college-level courses delivered by world’s leading expert speakers and hosts. We craft each summit and masterclass to deliver a complete educational experience on each topic.

NOT A PITCH FEST – No Hidden Agendas We do not allow speakers to pitch their products, courses or services on our summit.  That means YOU GET a full 100% learning experience without wading though time-consuming sales pitches.  Your experience is our #1 Priority.

–=–

They just single-handedly deflated my basket of critiques for every other conference! Of course, I find myself wondering just how my 45 minute presentation will “jive” with the rest of the speakers, considering the sites’ use of empty flattering titles like patriot and sovereignty. But I sense good intentions. It’s impossible not to be on guard, yet I remain hopeful that the above descriptions reign true. It felt like a great interview, perhaps one of my best, and perhaps that’s because I knew those listening would still be chained (and patriotically so) in the legal matrix that is this corporation nation, the open-air debtor’s prison, yet perhaps open enough (or finally hopeless and grounded enough) to see those national, contractually bound chains. I wonder what dissonance happens inside the mind of someone that flies gleefully the United States commercial flag, the very banner of their own neo-feudal captors. I wonder, do they still believe they are the actual People (States), that “the constitution” somehow protects them as foreigners in the actual States united, or that their inherent God-given rights somehow come from codes and other documents of that corporation in Washington DC and its constitutions instead of from God? Will they listen, or will they continue seeking their freedom and privacy from the men that seek to deaden their spirit so as to control (govern) their minds (mentis), while contracted in the corporate public realm, unable to overcome this false, legal persona and all the benefits of that lowest form of feudal tenure?

Yet it appears I am not alone in this subject. Reading some of the speaker descriptions suggests that maybe the truth movement mythos no longer has a such a stranglehold over us all.

To be frank, at first I was not going to advertise my participation in this online conference, as at the time I was not aware just who my name would be placed next to, learning from past experience. But in hindsight, I find it fascinating that people can listen to myself, an uncredentialled alternative researcher, next to government employees like Alan Keyes, etc. Can such men of government speak truthfully about such things? This strange dichotomy, the pitfalls of national patriotism (Stockholm Syndrome), and the exposure of these strange truths about the nation, the states (People), and of this docile truth movement (the movement that never moves), may just bring reinvigoration to this co-opted alternative construct, and that alone may be worth the price of admission, which again is free for a limited time each day.

As always, use caution, trust but verify, and never forget that you are the master of your own chosen path. Remember that God-given, inherent rights come from God, and that no man is sovereign (can’t have two gods). Remember the Bible is very foundation of the common law and of the maxims (principles) of law, and that all disease is contracted. Remember that patriotism is “the last refuge of a scoundrel”, according to Samuel Johnson’s infamous dictionary, and that the delusion of patriotism is just about all the illegitimate (de facto) national government has left in its bag of illusions. Loose use of this term brings caution, for no actual patriot would ever call himself as such. True love of country, of ones fellow man, is not the same as the false love of dependent enslavement to personhood (legal status) in a nation. Do not lose yourself in nonsensical, repetitious rhetoric, promises that have not and cannot ever be kept, or gurus selling you something that is the opposite of the only True Freedom of self-government, self-existence, and self-evidence. Never forget what you are. Never forget that the matrix cannot be fixed from within or while you are subject to it. Never forget that spiritual problems cannot be solved by secular, legal things. And most of all, never forget…

  • “Most of the evil in this world is done by people with good intentions.” –T.S. Eliot
  • “Hell isn’t merely paved with good intentions; it’s walled and roofed with them. Yes, and furnished too.” –Aldous Huxley

With those mental notes in mind, I invite you to discerningly partake and support Clyde and his Common Sense Summit, August 2nd-6th, and to help spread the word. Please note that I will personally not be taking any financial rewards or “sharing” in this or any other event, a personal rule, which is why as always I may speak candidly with no conflict of interest. I believe the organizer indeed has good intentions, but it is your own intent, knowledge, due dilligence, and mastery of terms that matters. It’s sure to be an interesting, mindful experience.

Check out the speakers real quick, here:

Link: https://commonsensesummit.com

Thanks, and be well…

.

–Clint > Richard-son (Realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Tuesday, July 20th, 2021

Is Math Destroying Our Perception Of Reality?


(Author’s Note: This can be considered a slightly modified chapter for the distant release of my book called Gleaming The Matrix. With current events in synthetic biology and other insanities, I felt it to be needed right about now. Please enjoy.)

It is said that money, or more precisely the love of money, is the root of all evil. And yet, what is the sum of all pretended types of money if not the mere fictional representation of a manmade, fixed mathematical equation; a false, artificial valuation assigned by some pretended “problem” to be solved consisting in a non-existent form symbolized as some actual, Real substance? Value is a mathematical term. Sum is a mathematical term. Equation is a mathematical term. One, five, ten, twenty, fifty, and one-hundred, when describing money’s artificial valuation, are all mathematical terms. Simply stated, money is just math personified. This personification and artificial valuation is also known as the anthropomorphized god of mammon.

And so this begs the question: Can math ever be Truth?

If mammon is the metaphorical false god of monetary valuation, that is, wealth and riches, then it must be said that the underlying language art, logicality, and indeed science of mammon is merely mathematics. No math, no value. No value, no false-reality.

And so perhaps having and taking only one god makes a bit more sense when money is seen as just a problem of math, the term problem being as well a mathematical term. Worship Truth or worship the price tag of abandoning Truth, for Truth has no value to be worshiped. It is priceless. No amount of money can actually change or alter the Truth. And only the false perception of this artificially applied mathematical valuation can influence man to be the destroyer of Truth, to act against his own best interest, and to therefore become the satanic devil (agent of evil) he so fears. For with a false valuation in anything, necessarily, at the same time, comes an equal lack of respect in the self-evident, self-existent Truth of that thing. Therefore, the mere idea of mammon can ultimately destroy all things, but only through the minds and subsequent actions of the corrupted, delusional men it infects, for such a false god exists nowhere else but in the imagination of weak, mind-controlled (governed) men.

Even the so-called sciences have been corrupted by the worship of ownership value through patent rights, where science no longer studies Creation (Nature) but strives to reinvent Nature (Truth) in its own image. For the Truth cannot be patented. There is no value in Truth unless it can be kept secret from good men – this being the very foundation of all royal houses, their rulers, and clandestine secret societies. A false representation, a symbol, an artifice of valuation must be attached to the Truth for It to become the object of desire and greed. Only the image, not the Source, can be controlled by the power of mammon. And so men must be made to worship the image, the idol, the symbol of the Real if we are to be controlled by that false art form. Truth is no longer seen, only the artificial valuation thereof, making the Law of Nature untenable and without authority over the confused mind and spirit of the worshipers of mammon. For mammon is directly opposed to Nature (YHVH) and Its Law (LOGOS). These rulers and administrative governments (corporations) are not the bearers or protectors of Truth, for power only comes through the obfuscation and removal of Truth from any equation. Power, authority, relies solely, 100% upon on the organized, fictional artifice cast like a spell upon willfully ignorant men. Science is no longer done or published for the benefit of or from Truth, is no longer Natural, for mammon is become the god of corporate scientists. No profit, no science.

By all means, test yourself in this matter…

Do you see the priceless beauty in all things within Creation (Nature), or do you see only the false, monetary (mathematical) value assigned to it by evil men acting in incorporated institutions (artificial persons)? Perhaps you somehow see both at the same time, having two gods continuously pulling at your spirit in an endless value of self-control and empathy? The Bible is clear, do not worship anything of Truth (YHVH) or of Christ (LOGOS) with respect of persons (i.e. corporations). So should we put our trust in the Gold Fixing set at the Rothschild Bank in the City of London for the supposed daily market “value” of gold? Moreover, will even men of good conscious and moral rectitude ever be able to overcome this corruption of the mind and spirit, this root of all evil, in order to recognize gold for what it actually is – as a priceless part of Nature? If, when asked what gold is, your automatic, rote answer is some form of “money” or jewelry for show, then you may already be destroyed by your lack of inherent (True) knowledge, as predicted.

Do you measure land by its beauty and priceless Nature of self-Existence and self-Evidence, or do you measure it by its value in mathematically calculated acres, miles, hectares, feet, etc., as represented by the false, monetary valuation thereof?

Are trees a priceless treasure to be loved and protected, or are they a valuable commodity on the securities and exchange markets?

Are all men Naturally free, or are men merely some mathematical formulation of value as various forms of voluntary and involuntary slaves, subjects, employees… commodities to be used (employed) for mere sale and extortion? And just how do you decide which men are free and which have value? (Actually, that’s a trick question: you don’t. Your masters do!)

What is a spiritual awakening but the uncomfortable ability to recognize ones own corruption in the legal, mathematical construct of mammon? And what so-called “Christian” stemming from today’s corporate religions can say that mammon is in fact not their chosen god? Sadly, in this regard, Christ has no True followers, for the followers of Christ must worship Truth in all things.

Everything we see, feel, touch, taste, and smell has been cursed with some ultimately meaningless estimation of artificial, mathematical valuation. We pay for meaningless (valueless) sex, or inversely prostitute ourselves for that money. We eat bad food because it’s pretended value is less than good food. We are conned into adopting children of some racial ethnicity (family) not our own because they are somehow cheaper and less in demand in an almost black market of orphaned kids, a market causing its own need for child trafficking to support it. We purchase plastic bracelets that supposedly represent recycling, like a guilt tax on our own wasteful behavior, bearing them in false show of our non-existent activism, our hypocritical non-action. In the end, through these daily and lifelong calculations of worth and valuation, we prove our love of money more than Life (self-Existence) itself. Everything, every action, every duty, every promise, and every limit can be bought and sold like a financial instrument on the dark market of our wretched, reaped souls. All disease is contracted, and the sickness of poverty and wealth are certainly no exceptions.

Of course, this word love carries the more ancient meaning of belief in something, specifically in the “value” of anything. Another word for this type of consideration is affection:

–=–

MAMMONnoun – Riches; wealth; or the god of riches. Ye cannot serve God and mammon. Matthew 6:24. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

MAMMONIST – noun – A person devoted to the acquisition of wealth; one whose affections are placed supremely on riches; a worldling… (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

AFFECTION – noun1. The state of being affected. [Little Used.] 2. Passion; but more generally, 3. A bent of mind towards a particular object, holding a middle place between disposition, which is natural, and passion, which is excited by the presence of its exciting object. Affection is a permanent bent of the mind, formed by the presence of an object, or by some act of another person, and existing without the presence of its object. 4. In a more particular sense, a settled good will, love or zealous attachment; as, the affection of a parent for his child... 5. Desire; inclination; propensity, good or evil; as, virtuous or vile affections. Romans 1:31Galatians 5:24. 6. In a general sense, an attribute, quality or property, which is inseparable from its object; as, love, fear and hope are affections of the mind; figure, weight, etc., are affections of bodies. 7. Among physicians, a disease, or any particular morbid state of the body; as, a gouty affection; hysteric affection. 8. In painting, a lively representation of passion. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

FIGURE – noun – fig’ur. [Latin figura, from figo, to fix or setSee Feign.] 1. The form of any thing as expressed by the outline or terminating extremities. Flowers have exquisite figures. A triangle is a figure of three sides. A square is a figure of four equal sides and equal angles. 2. Shape; form; person; as a lady of elegant figure. A good figure or person, in man or woman, gives credit at first sight to the choice of either. 3. Distinguished appearance; eminence; distinction; remarkable character. Ames made figure in Congress; Hamilton, in the cabinet. 4. Appearance of any kind; as an ill figure; a mean figure. 5. Magnificence; splendor; as, to live in figure and indulgence. 6. A statue; an image; that which is formed in resemblance of something else; as the figure of a man in plaster. 7. Representation in painting; the lines and colors which represent an animal, particularly a person; as the principal figures of a picture; a subordinate figure. 8. In manufactures, a design or representation wrought on damask, velvet and other stuffs. 9. In logic, the order or disposition of the middle term in a syllogism with the parts of the question. 10. In arithmetic, a character denoting a number; as 2. 7. 9. 11. In astrology, the horoscope; the diagram of the aspects of the astrological houses. 12. In theology, type; representative13. In rhetoric, a mode of speaking or writing in which words are deflected from their ordinary signification, or a mode more beautiful and emphatical than the ordinary way of expressing the sense; the language of the imagination and passions; as, knowledge is the light of the mind; the soul mounts on the wings of faith; youth is the morning of life. In strictness, the change of a word is a trope, and any affection of a sentence a figure; but these terms are often confounded. 14. In grammar, any deviation from the rules of analogy or syntax... – verb transitive – fig’ur. 1. To form or mold into any determinate shape. Accept this goblet, rough with figured gold. 2. To show by a corporeal resemblance, as in picture or statuary. 3. To cover or adorn with figures or images; to mark with figures; to form figures in by art; as, to figure velvet or muslin. 4. To diversify; to variegate with adventitious forms of matter. 5. To represent by a typical or figurative resemblance. The matter of the sacraments figureth their end. 6. To imagine; to image in the mind. 7. To prefigure; to foreshow. 8. To form figuratively; to use in a sense not literal; as figured expressions. [Little Used.] 9. To note by charactersverb intransitive – To make a figure; to be distinguished. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

FEIGN – verb transitive – fane. [Latin fingo. The Latin forms fictum, fictus, whence figura, figure, also fucus.] 1. To invent or imagine; to form an idea or conception of something not real. There are no such things done as thou sayest, but thou feignest them out of thine own heart. Nehemiah 6:8. 2. To make a show of; to pretend; to assume a false appearance; to counterfeit... She feigns a laugh… 3. To represent falsely; to pretend; to form and relate a fictitious tale. 4. To dissemble; to conceal. obsolete. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

–=–

As I have attempted to explain within this blog, in my books, and on my Red Pill Sunday School series of lesson-based shows, the concept of what is Real (Truth) and what is artificial (manmade) is also exactly what the term God (as expressed in the “name” YHVH) was intended and is defined as, regardless of the false images of religions and the spiritless, commissioned artists of church and state. God is Truth. The Truth (God) will set you free. The temple of God (Truth) is in you. But the great destroyer, mammon (artificial mathematical valuation), kills the spirit and promotes greed and desire, want over need, and especially a disrespect of the Natural, priceless value (Nature/Self-Existence and Self-Evidence) of Life Itself. In other words, this false valuation of Nature and our own place within it causes men to believe they are false gods, with some dreamed up sovereignty that allows a total disregard and disrespect toward the private rights and sovereignty of everything else in Nature; toward the inherent right of self-Existence in all things, toward Life Itself. And this is why no man can worship both these gods at once, for one is the Truth of Nature and one is wholly opposed to and thus anti-Nature. One cannot worship Truth while caught in a web of lies.

–=–

“What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost which is in you, 
which ye have of God, and ye are not your own?”

‘Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you?”

“If any man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroy; for the temple of God is holy, which temple ye are.”

“And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people.”

–1Corintheans 3: 16-17, 2 Corintheans 6: 16, 19, KJB

–=–

Now go back and read these same verses, replacing the word God (YHVH) with the word Truth:

–=–

“What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost (Spirit) which is in you, 
which ye have of Truth, and ye are not your own?”

‘Know ye not that ye are the temple of Truth, and that the Spirit of Truth dwelleth in you?”

“If any man defile the temple of Truth, him shall Truth destroy; for the temple of Truth is holy, which temple ye are.”

“And what agreement hath the temple of Truth with idols? for ye are the temple of the living Truth; as Truth hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their Truth, and they shall be my people.”

–1Corintheans 3: 16-17, 2 Corintheans 6: 16, 19, KJB

–=–

Now go back and read these same verses, replacing the word God (YHVH) with the word Nature:

–=–

“What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost (Spirit) which is in you, 
which ye have of Nature, and ye are not your own?”

‘Know ye not that ye are the temple of Nature, and that the Spirit of Nature dwelleth in you?”

“If any man defile the temple of Nature, him shall Nature destroy; for the temple of Nature is holy, which temple ye are.”

“And what agreement hath the temple of Nature with idols? for ye are the temple of the living Nature; as Nature hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their Nature, and they shall be my people.”

–1Corintheans 3: 16-17, 2 Corintheans 6: 16, 19, KJB

–=–

What you cannot do is replace the word YHVH with the word mammon, or math, or sacred geometry.

There simply is no Truth (YHVH) in math. Math is not of Nature, but of the logic-based minds of men. The symbol, the valuation, is never the Reality. There is no truth in mammon. There is no truth in money. These are not of Nature. Therefore, there is no true valuation of Nature in money.

Translation: you must believe in money and its supposed value for it to exist. Thus, it is the LOVE (BELIEF) in money that is the root of all evil. With this understanding we can no longer pretend that loving money and using money are in any way different actions. Sorry…

The requirements for being Truth, that is, the requisite state of Being for anything considered to be of and under the Law and Laws of Nature (YHVH) include nothing of the art of mathematics. They cannot actually be purchased with money in Reality, only in the mind. Yet that artificial action of commerce and the flattering reciept of fictional, flattering title that is pretended to be Real is at the root of our trespass against YHVH and Its Law. These requirements, these inherent traits are, indeed, solely as follows:

  1. Self-Evidence – It must be a “Creation” of, in, and under Nature and Its Law, a Creation of YHVH (God). It must be Naturally occurring. In other words, the proof or “evidence” of its existence is not a requirement for its existence, but rather its very Natural (obvious/self-evident) inherent existence proves itself to exist. Thus, it is part of the Supreme Being (verb) that is Truth (YHVH). Nature (Truth) is self-evident in all Its parts.
  2. Self-Existence – Likewise, that which is REAL, exists only in TRUTH (without title, artificial property, or false valuation), in and because of itself (YHVH – I AM THAT I AM). This again requires no proofs stemming from man’s designs or language arts, for that which Exists does so despite what man names, references, or compares it to. A noun (name) is certainly not any proof of Existence, for a name (noun) is purely an invention and property of man’s imagination and language arts. Thus “Creation”, which is the ongoing, never-ending “Being” of Nature (all that is not manmade), and which is not to be confused with a single point in man’s limited imagination and artificial timeline of what “history” is, constitutes only that which is Truth, that which Exists or comes into Existence due to the forces and Law(s) of Nature.

What is adversary to Truth? Only one thing, actually, being that which is manmade.

When we look for an answer as to what an act of Nature (Truth) is, especially in the legal realm of artificial things, we find the same conceptualization of that which is self-evident and self-existent, the term Nature merely pointing to the Supreme self-existence of what is YHVH (God), a power that is not of man, is uncontrollable, unpredictable, and especially not mathematical. This power must be specifically defined by the legal system, especially in insurance policies, and so is referenced simply and Truthfully as an “act of God” (YHVH).

Act Of God – Event that directly and exclusively results from the occurrence of natural causes that could not have been prevented by the exercise of foresight or caution; an inevitable accident. Courts have recognized various events as acts of God – Tornatoes, earhquakes, death, extraordinarily high tides, violent winds, and floods. Many insurance policies for property damage exclude from their protection damage caused by acts of God. (–West’s Encyclopedia of American Law, Edition 2)

Act Of God – (noun) – A natural catastrophe which no one can prevent such as an earthquake, a tidal wave, a volcanic eruption, or a tornado. Acts of God are significant for two reasons: 1) for the havoc and damage they wreak, and 2) because often contracts state that “acts of God” are an excuse for delay or failure to fulfill a commitment or to complete a construction project. Many insurance policies exempt coverage for damage caused by acts of God, which is one time an insurance company gets religion. At times disputes arise as to whether a violent storm or other disaster was an act of God (and therefore exempt from a claim) or a foreseeable natural event. (–God knows the answer!, Gerald N. Hill and Kathleen T. Hill)

Act Of God – An accident or event that cannot be prevented by ordinary human foresight. The occurrence should normally be a natural one, like flood or earthquake. IT EXEMPTS A PARTY FROM STRICT LIABILITY IN COMMON LAW, an by definition, from negligence. (–Collins Dictionary of Law, 2006)

Act Of God – In contracts. This phrase denotes those accidents which arise from physical causes, and which cannot be prevented. 2. Where the law casts a duty on a party, the performance shall be excused, if it be rendered impossible by the act of God; but where the party, by his own contract, engages to do an act, it is deemed to be his own faulty and folly that he did not thereby provide against contingencies, and exempt himself from responsibilities in certain events and in such case, (that is, in the instance of an absolute general contract the performance is not excused by an inevitable accident, or other contingency, although not foreseen by, nor within the control of the party. (–A Law Dictionary, Adapted to the Constitution and Laws of the United States, By John Bouvier, 1856)

–=–

How then, may an act of man be an act of God instead of and immune from also being considered a legal action (done under man’s law in false persona)? The answer to this question is the definition of True Freedom, that is, Freedom under YHVH (Truth) and Its Law (i.e. LOGOS: the example of Christ). Unfortunately, what is not understood by most men is that the Law of God is neutral. In other words, it is considered as the negative law. This simply means that, while all of man’s legal law is called as “positive law,” or that which is added unnaturally to and in opposition of what already Exists self-Evidently (the Law of Nature), the Law of God (the Nature of Existence) stands in negativity, meaning that every man has the right to say no, to refuse the addition of anything not of YHVH, to refuse belief in and action upon what is not Truth, and therefore to remain pure and untainted in mind, body, and soul. The act of saying no is the highest act of law, for as the maxim goes, he that denies need show any proof. Only he that makes a positive (legal) claim must show proof, for whatever is claimed legally is always not self-evident or self-existent. What is legally claimed is never negative in its Nature. Man may only claim what is artificial, for man can in Reality, in Truth, own no part of YHVH, of which he himself is part of and the temple for. Freedom is not a positive claim. Freedom is the God-given (negative) right not to be governed (controlled) by corrupted men, by the artifice of man’s inventions. In other words, he that acts in and under YHVH (Absolute Truth) need never prove anything to any man or legal system, for the Highest Nature and Law is always behind his actions. Therefore his actions are self-evident. That which is positive is never that which is of YHVH. Only tat which is positive (artificial) requires proof. Math, as a manmade artifice, always requires proof, while what math represents in Reality never needs math to prove its self-Existence and self-Evidence.

To be clear, the only thing that proves math is math itself. Math is not self-evident. Math is not self-existent. Math is not part of the I AM.

And let us be clear, the only proof of the value of money is the willing faith that corrupted men put into it. Only when men stop trying to prove themselves through legal and other artificial means will men know God (Truth). But in general men have been tricked into believing in the false-truth of money, or in other words to love (believe in) money while considering “God” (Reality) to be false. Yet YHVH is defined as Truth, and money as a false god. How can this be?

–=–

Positive Law

Those laws that have been duly enacted by a properly instituted and popularly recognized branch of government. Postive laws may be promulgated, passed, adopted, or otherwise “posited” by an official or entity vested with authority by the government to prescribe the rules and regulations for a particular community. In the United States, postive laws come in a variety of forms at both the state and federal levels, including legislative enactments, judicial orders, executive decrees, and administrative regulations. In short, a positive law is any express written command of the government. The belief that the only legitimate sources of law are those written rules and regulations laid down by the government is known as Positivism. –West’s Encyclopedia of American Law, Edition 2.

Positive Law

Noun – Statutory man-made law, as compared to “natural law” which is purportedly based on universally accepted moral principles, “God’s Law,” and/or derived from Nature and reason. The term “positive law,” was first used by Thomas Hobbes in Leviathan (1651). (See:  natural law) –Copyright 1981-2005 by Gerald N. Hill and Kathleen T. Hill.

–=–

As stated above, an act of God exempts a man (or legal party) from liability in the legal realm under common law. In other words, as man is the temple of God (spirit), what comes forth as a result of the actions of any man, when done under the moral compass and Law of God (Nature), cannot be mistaken or contractually understood to be a legal act. An act of God is not punishable under man’s legal law. Thus, a True and Free (self-governing) man must at all times refrain from all that is not of Truth. This, of course, includes money (mammon). For the legal law is the manmade law concerning only evil acts, that is, the administration and regulation of acts against God (Nature/Truth), those not done under the Law of Nature, or more accurately, those that are not self-Evident. Citizenship is merely the organized, often pre-forgiven, administrated adulteries of men that cannot govern their own minds because their spirit has become legally dead. And there are no court cases that, at the heart of the matter before the court, do not equate “crime” with the artificial, pretended monetary valuation of that crime. Remedy is always in the form of mammon, for money is the only actual product created and administered by government. All money is property of government. Government is the host and beneficiary of the parasitic intent of mammon. In other words, legal courtrooms administrate only evils, never good deeds. For the maxim of law is clear that good and moral behavior cannot be forced upon persons.

The entire legal system is a franchise of mammon. Never forget that governments are the inventors and owners of all money, no matter whom those governments allow to print or pretend to create through debt/credit paper that root of all evil. Every court case has a monetary valuation attached to it, as does every person. But remember, nothing that is an act of God, including free men under God, can be made to magically “appear” in court, for True men take no persona (legal mask) and pretend to be nothing but that of a part of God’s self-existent, self-evident Nature and Law. Only legally invented persons appear, for they don’t exist in the Real world. The government may only control its own artificial (positive) creation, that is, persons. Thus it can only control men who act in a government persona (mask/status). This is the law of agency.

No game may be played unless those playing the game agree to the rules and thus pretend to temporarily become the artificial avatar those rules apply to. The shoe or car in Monopoly. The pawn in chess. Thomas Anderson in The Matrix. The legal system is merely a game, and you choose whether to play or not and what character to use. But when it is forgotten by the players that the game isn’t Real, isn’t of God’s Nature and Law, and therefore the avatar forgets he or she is a self-evident, self-existent man in Reality, then… well, welcome to the United States corporation: a soulless dystopia of greed and neglect. All hail mammon!

Remember, in law, a man is an act of God with inherent (God-given) rights. A man always has the (negative) right to say no, but only if he has not contracted a legal dis-ease.

A person (legal status) is a contractual engagement between a man and the state to perform a sanctioned duty, and God/Truth/Reality is generally no excuse for nonfulfillment of contract within that anti-God (legal) system. Thus a man of God that corrupts himself with contractual (legal) law is no longer considered to be of Truth (God) nor protected by It. From the legal point of view, and act of God is exempt from the legal (strict) law. What is of God (Truth) is never bound to the state. What is an act of God is never controllable by the state. For the state holds no power over what is self-existent and self-evident, the very definition of YHVH. Only through illusion and trickery does the fiction infect the minds of men so that the state may then effect Nature through them, acting on their behalf, leaving no actual choice, only causality. Choice only exists in the negative, not the positive.

Most importantly, we must understand that Truth contains no artifice any more than artifice can be Truth. What is not Truth is not part of God (YHVH), for God is only Truth. Truth and Truth alone will set men free. Persons are legally created, positive law vessels of enslavement, putting men under a performance contract, bond, and surety. Bouvier’s definition above shows that the constitution only protects from infringement the inherent (negative) rights of men, and that legal persons are not protected thereof, for persons have no inherent (God-given) rights. TO BE CLEAR, PERSONS DO NOT EXIST IN NATURE, ARE NOT SELF-EXSISTANT, AND ARE NOT SELF-EVIDENT. Persons require proof of identity. Nothing of or invented by man is God-given. Nothing of man is Truth. For all that is Truth is of YHVH. YHVH IS TRUTH.

This repetition of concept is not accidental on my part, and is quite relevant to the subject line. It is not religion, but Law. One must understand this difference to be free, for True Freedom only exists in YHVH (self-existence/self-evidence). Existing as a non-self-evident person in law is not True Freedom. All artificial, legal forms of so-called “freedoms” are man-made under contract, defined legally as franchises. Franchises (incorporations) are not of God, existing only in legally bound contracts (spiritual death). If these terms are unfamiliar to you, please download my book, here: strawmanstory.info

What is defined here as an “act of God” is not nor cannot be “proven” by mathematics or some other artificial means, but by the self-evident, self-existent Truth that God’s Nature and Design is ultimately not knowable to man, that is, the force that is an act of Nature, meaning an act of God’s Creation (Self-Existence), is ultimately unpredictable by artificial means. When attempted to be cast over Nature like a sophisticated connect-the-dots fishing net, mathematics simply causes the artificial feeling of predictability and therefore temporary, false-control against that which is not controllable by man. It causes an addictive, short-lasting god complex; one in which the typical math junky chases with maddening leaps and bounds while never reaching that perfect high of absolute predictability. Math loves chaos. Chaos is the false god of math. For chaos at first often appears predictable before at any moment spiraling off into what then appears to be randomness, all while admitting to the Truth – that some “unknown” Law (YHVH/LOGOS) is controlling it the whole time. Man may certainly predict the outcome of his own invention, but even the artificial law of man admits without doubt that Nature (God) is at all times a higher power than man… and therefore ultimately uncontrollable and unpredictable.

Thanks to the hubris and arrogance of mathematicians engaged in scientism, an inversion of Reality has taken place. In other words, God (Truth) has been relegated by the arts and so-called sciences as artificial, while mathematics has been elevated to God-like proportion and depth. Math has become to many the only path to enlightenment, a false light designed to express Truth proportionate to its own extreme limitations and faults. Math, it is said, is perfect. But can perfection exist in that which comes from such an imperfect source, that of man’s imagination? By definition, Truth is perfection. Can what is not of the self-existent, self-evident Truth (God) be perfect? Can what is artificial be at the same time what is the Truth?

Weather forecasting is merely a thinly laid pretext to weather control. Yet control is wholly dependent on predictability. And we all know how that’s going: it may or may not rain today… a 50% chance of snow… etc.

The question one might ask is this: does this term of the legal art, as an acknowledgement of an “Act of God,” in some way prove that God (Truth) exists?

And that would be a trick question, a practical joke we play on ourselves. It’s also the proverbial Achilles’ heel of scientistic mathematicians everywhere. Man’s definitions and titles, no matter what language, in letters or in numbers, are never anything more than just that – symbols of the Real. They are lies told to encapsulate the Truth within an organized system of falsity. For man in no way can Create Truth, only the fictions and symbols that represent It. Art is never what is Real. Art is man’s artificial reflection of what is Truth. When art is changed, damaged, or destroyed, the Real remains untouched and unaffected, for the Real is self-Existent. Likewise, when a person is declared dead, this does not mean the man that person reflects in legal status is also dead. The death of a man is a cessation of a vessel that carries Life (Truth). The legal (artificial) death of a fiction of law (person) is merely the end (execution) of a legal performance contract (art). This act, being not of God, requires legal proof in the form of a certified a death certificate that proves the birth of that contractual status (persona) to be ended. There is nothing of self-evidence; nothing of life therein.

Within the very intent and meaning of YHVH (God) is again the word Existence, as that which Exists despite man’s designs against Nature and Its Law. YHVH does not merely exist, YHVH IS EXISTENCE. Thus any question demanding an answer to the non-sequitur of the self-existence of God is mute, for YHVH is defined as all that is Self-Existence. What man invents cannot be defined as that which is self-Created, self-evident, or self-existent. A Creation of God Exists with or without man’s lowly forms of legal or mathematical proof, for man is as well a self-Existent part of YHVH. Man, in other words, cannot escape the Truth that all men are Creations of God (Nature), despite any attempt to prove otherwise.

The intent and meaning of the term YHVH was never meant to be debated or proven right or wrong. One cannot very well argue that there are two forms of TRUE (self) Existence, that which is in and of Nature (YHVH) found upon the Earth, and that which is of and in the so-called “world” of artifice, hosted by men and the designs we harbor against Nature (God) and Its Law. A Natural act of man is of course also an act of God, unless that man does so against God and Its Immortal and Never-ending Creation and Law, also called as an evil. What is built of man is always temporary, for YHVH is only understood as that which is Eternal, having no end and no beginning. This does not require belief, only the understanding that eternity is as well Self-Evident.

Any and all arguments, debates, and cultish sects that devote themselves to the non-existence of YHVH, that is, to the non-existence of the Whole of Existence (God) itself, can be understood here only to be an unprovable contradiction; a contrarian, nihilistic nonsense restricted to the realm of fools and their insidiously meaningless errands.

Enter the cult of the artifice and artful sciences of mathematics…

I recently viewed this short documentarian presentation that I highly recommend to all, representing a sort of final end all be all answer to the notion of mathematical proofs. Within we find that the three basic necessities or axioms that are apparently required in mathematics to be considered as True and accurate, those of completeness, consistency, and decidability, are indeed unable to be proven or evidenced. In fact, quite the opposite is True. The oxymoronic question then is this: can mathematics prove YHVH (Truth), which is Self-Existent and self-Evident, and therefore without need of such proofs of men?

Please take the time to watch this presentation, for it may be the most important thing you watch in this lifetime:

–=–

How does one perfect a system that is by its very nature imperfect?

Now consider the frightening Truth about what is the absolute best that any artificial intelligence can possibly be. At best, any A.I. will necessarily be incomplete, inconsistent, and therefore unpredictable.

–=–

A.I. Would you like to play a game?

Typical scientistic mathematicianYes, please!

A.I. – How about “Global-Thermal Nuclear War”

Typical scientistic mathematicianHell yes! After all, what could go wrong…?

–=–

The moral of the story is simple: math cannot uncover the secrets of the Universe (YHVH). Math will never tell the Truth. Therefore, any system based on mathematical language (art) will only produce artifice. More to the point, the only True equation we may take from this is the following:

MATH IS NOT EQUAL TO TRUTH.

GOD (TRUTH) DOES NOT USE MATH.

AND GEOMETRY IS CERTAINLY NOT SACRED.

–=–

Now before you get upset that I’m calling out your cult-like love of golden geometrical ratios, please understand that the point here is not that these artificial shapes and equations aren’t or can’t be useful. Please note here that it’s not at all ironic that we are taught to equate such a neato geometric shape with the ultimate standard of false valuation in mammon, that is gold, by the way. And it’s quite humorous to ponder that the market price of gold changes daily, therefore so too must the artificial value of the “golden ratio.” The point is that when men place the religious connotation of sacredness upon its own inventions and symbols, the Real is often lost to the symbol, the symbol taking upon itself an existence of its own; one not necessarily still attached to Reality. The worship of symbology, or in other words the holding as sacred of any language art (including mathematics), has today led to the worship of the symbol as a simulacrum. While once the symbol was a metaphorical replacement for something Real, being a simulation, it’s when the symbol becomes its own false truth that the simulation turns into its most corrupt representation of itself, the simulacrum. In the case of so-called sacred geometry, this logical fallacy plays out as follows:

Simulation – the symbol represents the real.

Simulacrum – the symbol is detached from the real and worshiped as its own image.

Thus we turn from the understanding that geometry is an artificial and always imperfect tool of the measurement of the self-existent, self-evident Truth of Nature, and begin to believe instead that the universe is a tool created with geometry, or that geometry is in fact a Law of Nature.

In all cases where man worships the symbol of his own making, the artifice instead of the Real (Truth), then the word sacred takes upon itself the inverse meaning of cursed. That is to say that when the artifice (lies) are worshiped as sacred truths, then all that may come from such belief (love) is cursed to be inharmonious with Life, with Nature and Its Law.

So what is the state of those that hold geometry as sacred?

In a word, idolatry.

To put it another way, God doesn’t do math.

–=–

SACRED – adjective – [Latin sacersacred holy, cursed, damnable. We here see the connection between sacredness and secrecy. The sense is removed or separated from that which is common, vulgar, polluted, or open, public; and accursed is separated from society or the privileges of citizens, rejected, banished.] 1. Holy; pertaining to God or to his worship; separated from common secular uses and consecrated to God and his service; as a sacred place; a sacred day; a sacred feast; sacred service; sacred orders. 2. Proceeding from God and containing religious precepts; as the sacred books of the Old and New Testament. 3. Narrating or writing facts respecting God and holy things; as a sacred historian. 4. Relating to religion or the worship of God; used for religious purposes, as sacred songs; sacred music; sacred history. 5. Consecrated; dedicated; devoted; with to. A temple sacred to the queen of love. 6. Entitled to reverence; venerable. Poet and saint to thee alone were given, the two most sacred names of earth and heav’n. 7. Inviolable, as if appropriated to a superior being; as sacred honor or promise. Secrets of marriage still are sacred held. Sacred majesty. In this title, sacred has no definite meaning, or it is blasphemy. Sacred place, in the civil law, is that where a deceased person is buried.

SACRED – (‘seikrid) – Adj. 1. Exclusively devoted to a deity or to some religions ceremony or use; holy; consecrated. 2. Worthy of or regarded with reverence, awe, or respect. 3. Protected by superstition or piety from irreligious actions. 4. Connected with or intended for religious use: sacred music. 5. Dedicated to; in honor of… –Collins English Dictionary – Complete and Unabridged, 12 Edition 2014

–=–

Money and geometry are religions, or rather what are instead anti-religions.

Money is not evil. The love (belief) in money as Reality is evil. Therefore, money can only be used for evil.

Geometry is not evil. The love (belief) in geometry as Reality is evil. Therefore geometry can only be used for evil.

That sounds a bit crazy, I know. Here is where the art of neutrality comes into play, which disregards beliefs and prejudices. Let us consider then what is evil? Evil is very simply that which is opposed to Nature (YHVH) and Its Law. All inventions of men are necessarily opposed to (opposite from, not the same as) Nature, meaning they are not self-evident or self-existent. Anti-gravity is certainly an evil, though it may be used for good. Geometry may also be used for good, but its nature will always be that of a manmade construct, and therefore always must be examined and considered as such. Duel use. To put it another way, the FORM of money and the FORM of geometry have no SUBSTANCE. What is of man is always merely the FORM of some SUBSTANCE that already pre-existed self-evidently. That is, what man invents and thus “creates” can only be the FORM of God’s already self-Existent CREATION (SUBSTANCE). Man does not and cannot Create as YHVH does. Here again we find this to be a self-evident Truth. If you don’t believe it, then please point to anything of SUBSTANCE ever invented by man that was not first removed from the self-existing Earth? I’ll wait…

Simply stated, the perfection of self-Existence cannot be replaced by the imperfection of invention.

Like any challenge to every cult or religion, this knowledge based on empirical evidence may come as a shock to you. Indeed, man’s design of mathematics relies wholly on its supposed ability to be used as a PROOF. But let us consider the Truth about this conceptual, manmade tool we call as math.

Firstly, I’m sure some of you have already relegated me into the same pit of despair that every religion does when someone challenges the validity of its manmade belief system. And like any religion, you may excommunicate me and put a scarlet letter upon my imaginary lapel simply because I questioned your authority as the spokesman for that mystical, unknown mathematical designer of the Universe.

Obviously, like religion, mathematics is a circular logic. It is limited to its own set, much like any alphabet. And it is designed to be this way, let’s not forget. It serves a purpose and can be very useful. But it can only be verified or proven by its own formally, proprietarily inbred formulae. And most importantly, nothing in Nature happens as a result of mathematics, though certain events can certainly be measured mathematically. Again, if this is a difficult concept for you, then please prove in Nature, in Reality, the self-Existence of the number 1. It’s impossible. Your only proof must come from a mathematical formula, for the number 1 only exists inside mathematics. There is no actual “1” in Nature. This is because there is no SUBSTANCE in math, only FORM.

Remember, what is of Nature and Its Law is negative (inherent). Inversely, what is of man and its artifice is positive (an unnatural addition).

Math, being a construct of man, can and should only ever be considered to be positive. What is added to Nature by man is not a Creation of Nature. A symbol is never Source.

You may be surprised to learn that 90% of what the Bible teaches is simply this: to never confuse, worship, or give undue authority to what is artificial (manmade) as if it’s the same as that which is of self-Existence (YHVH). Keep all Creation pure, including most of all the sacred vessel of God — the mind, body, and soul (spirit) of man. The Bible is a book of Natural Law, to be followed religiously (held sacred at all costs). Therefore, it is 100% opposed to man’s matrix of artificial, positive, legal law. Why? Simple. What is of man in any form is never the substance of God (self-Existence). Take the obfuscations and mis-transliterations of false “Christian” religions out of the equation, and suddenly the Bible is as beautiful and self-evident as Nature and Its Law. But it must be read only with the intent of finding and worshiping what it seeks to protect and hold sacred, the self-evident Truth. Like all manmade things, the Bible itself, while holding sacred knowledge, has been turned into a prop, furniture, considered only by its form without the substance it represents. The Bible, as the crucifix and cross, have become simulacra — mere symbols that bear no meaning, intent, or connection to their sacred purposes. This is what religion does to Truly sacred things.

Math is nothing more and nothing less than a very complicated yet logical written language. Unravel the form and mystery of The Matrix simulation to its foundational base level and all you have are mathematical symbols, each containing some artificial valuation, forced together in a controlled algorithm to pretend a false reality. Is that not also the description of 1+1=2? Does not such an equation, a pre-tended artificial valuation, need the agreement of both parties to be considered as fact? If I took these manmade symbols to any primitive tribe in the world, would they have any clue what they meant? More importantly, do they need to know the meaning of these fictional terms 1, +, =, and 2 to know the self-evident Truth about the collection of berries they collected from Nature? Do they need a word or symbol for these concepts, to live and to eat? Do they need to be able to draw out artificial plans or representations in numerical form in order to build a clay hut? Do they need to be reeducated to believe that numbers are “perfect” when their whole self-Existence has been in the perfection of God (Truth)? Do numbers cause Truth, or is Truth self-Existent? Do numbers prove Truth, or is Truth self-Evident?

Obviously math is not perfect, for math is a creation of man, made by men ignoring the Law of God (Truth). Yet turn on any math-based science entertainment show on television and, through special effects and visual technology (art), we see pictures and impossible images of the mathematical structure of the universe – a massive space that no man has been or ever will go. These shows have titles like “Understanding The Universe”, which is another way of saying that God (YHVH), which of course includes the self-evident and self-existent Universe as Its meaning, can be understood through mathematical equations turned into moving pictures of art (form without substance) invented by men from the extremely limited perspective of Earth. They actually believe they know what It is. And they attempt to remove the beautiful mystery of the unknown by replacing it with mathematical simulation, causing the delusion of false-knowledge for that which is not meant to be know by men. This religion of mathematical scientism, as what appears to be a purposeful side-effect cast like a spell upon the common group-think hive-mind, indeed causes that wonderous and unknowable mystery of YHVH (or as they call it, the Universe) to be relegated to just another conquest of man, like discovering America. Reality is all but ignored, the mysterious beauty disparaged by delusional, artful, colored-in renderings, causing the spiritual wonder and helplessness of man under the awesome and unfathomable power of God (YHVH) to be equally diminished. We don’t look up anymore to see the stars because the trillions of sources of artificial light from our contemporary designs against Nature have left the dark skies awash in a blanket of artificial illumination.

But let us take the example given in this documentary presentation above as our primary wake-up moment. It must be said first and foremost that, only when one limits oneself to the manmade construct of mathematics can one win or lose the debate. But then, one cannot claim to live in Truth and also ignore all Truth but what mathematics pretend. So already we find a paradox. However, for the sake of the point of the story, let’s speak directly to the foundation of all problems that man creates when acting against the Truth and Law that is and emanates from YHVH (God).

The scenario used is that all bearded men must be shaved by the designated “barber” of that town, no exceptions, and that of course includes the man that is the barber. And so, as the story goes, therefore the barber is unable to shave himself, for that STRICT LAW would then be broken, as the man would then be shaving himself instead of having the designated “barber”, which was the title of the man in need of shaving, do it for him.

And so the mathematicians go to work and find this to be a paradox. There is no way for the “barber” to be shaved.

Now, disregarding the sheer stupidity of this allegory, in order to show that this so-called paradox is in fact a false dialectic created by the same rules that created the problem in the first place, we must actually remove mathematics from the equation and remember the foundation of the Law of Nature (God). To solve any problem in Reality, the sum of some mathematical equation cannot ever be the final answer. In that, we find the societal and faith-based logical fallacies that are at the root of the actual problem. This is not a math problem, it’s a spiritual problem. And needless to say, there is no mathematical solution to a spiritual problem. Remember that it’s equally a self-evident Truth that there is no spiritual solution to a mathematical problem. They are not of the same realm.

Yet here we find the perfect example of how spiritual thought and action eliminates any mathematical problem that might be conceived or designed by man. To understand this, we must first understand that mathematics are designed to offer a non-spiritual view of anything. Math is not representative of God, only of man’s exploitation thereof. There are no morals in math equation. Why? Because there is no Truth in math equation. There is only the model, the cold form without substance, without Life.

And so, I can simply refer to the Bible, which states that men should never respect manmade, legally issued, or popular flattering titles, and suddenly this whole story becomes mute. In other words, just as the Truth is that there is no spoon in The Matrix simulation, there is no “Barber” in Reality. And it’s not that there is no spoon, there is nothing. It’s all artificial. Fake. Not Real. A simulation.

And so in order for this mathematical formulation to work, we must note that the Law of Truth must be ignored. That is, the fact that no man is actually, in Truth, a “barber”, must be ignored. The “barber” (flattering title/Noun) is a prop in the math script, and without that artificial construct of fiction, without that flattering title, no such mathematical problem would exist.

Math, like logic, only applies to manmade things. It should be apparent that what is self-evident (Truth) does not need external or manmade evidence to Exist. It does not need such proofs or evidence as can be provided by these constructs of men. Inversely, reason should not be confused with logic, nor should mathematics ever be used as the reason behind anything that isn’t manmade.

What we find is that there is no actual problem here in Reality, in Truth, and that only the artificial names, symbols, and titles that man assigns to himself cause any problems. If no man respected the artificial title of Barber, then no rule would be able to be formed. And he that has the skills linked to the flattering title of barber certainly need not use the title to use the skills. The skill, in other words, the action, does not need any title. No title can stop a man from acting, unless he believes in the power and authority and false law behind the title, and therefore that some authority higher than that title is the lawmaker, a false God. No title, no math problem.

The point of this is to show that no problem in Reality comes from a mathematical source, and so no mathematical solution can solve any problem in Reality. There is no spoon, just as there is no Barber. Yet faith in the title causes the need for manmade (non-spiritual) solutions to purely logic-based (manmade) problems, which ironically would not exist (as self-evident) in the first place without man’s foolish addiction to artifice. Manmade problems are never self-Existent. Manmade problems are a direct result of ignoring the Law and Laws of Nature (God).

To cut to the chase, the moral of this story is simply that negative spiritual problems cannot be fixed by positive artificial solutions, any more than secular problems are caused by True, Spiritual men of God. Lies cannot fix the Truth, for the Truth is already perfection and needs no fixing. Yet in all cases, the Truth can fix or eliminate the lies.

So how long will we keep lying to ourselves?

One thing is for sure, mathematics will not fix the damage men do to God’s Nature, and money will never buy love or spiritual pureness and happiness.

Be well…

.

–Clint > Richard-son (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Thursday, July 15th, 2021 of this artificial timeline…

“Gleaming The Matrix” (New Strawman Book Preview)


What will it be?
Be sure to watch the ending. It’s like a trailer for the book!

–=–

Greetings programs…

Just a short post to celebrate my friend Craig’s latest update on the cover for my next book, a private work (yes, if I am able, it will be free to download as all my works are, and available in paperback free with general donation toward my work [as an unconditional gift]).

Note: However, I am still seeking a publishing agent, for this and many other books both new and rewritten from my blog over the years. Any help in that department would be appreciated. In this case, I would be selling the book in the interest of getting it out there way more than I can alone, on the usual sites. That said, the pusillanimous gatekeepers of the publishing industry seem to have sold their souls to any such honest and integral works. The Truth is apparently poison to them. A general book proposal is available for this title upon request. Perhaps one of them will prove me wrong after all…

As stated, this work will be my best attempt to demystify The Matrix from a mere shallow attempt at Sci-fi entertainment designed to obfuscate and invert the Truth of its badly plagiarized source, Simulacrum and Simulation (by the late Jean Baudrillard), and reveal just how that author intended our collective “simulation” to be understood. It’s not often an author whose book is being used as a cornerstone (and an important prop) in a blockbuster film removes himself from that corrupted enterprise, especially when the reasons are spiritual, literary, and just.

If you’ve wondered just what the actual “matrix” is, look no further than the legal system you are caught in like a fly in a spider’s web. But the source is not what you think! For you are the temple. You are the source. You are the spoon.

The simulation has you…

Time to actually wake up!

One last note: I am nowhere close to being finished with this work, as my time is focused on documenting the criminal syndicate that is the NIH and religion of modern false science surrounding “SARS-2,” as well as its cover up and politicization. Please enjoy and support Craig’s works of art, for he has freely helped me and created these artistic masterpieces without reward and with love and kindness. This type of work is his contribution to consciousness, having woken up to the darkness surrounding the “professional” art world and of course suffered for that knowledge and clear vision.

Many have asked over the years how they can support me… Craig did it without consideration of even his own financial situation, not for me but for the sake of any it may reach out there. In a spiritual war, one that most don’t even see happening against them, we must give of ourselves not for reward but for the love of that which is threatened. I want to thank him for his dedication and valuable time given freely, but especially for encouraging me to keep writing with this ingenious cover-art. Hopefully the book will do Craig’s vision and art some justice!

More vids by Craig, including his work on my books and films: artofcraigs (bitchute.com)

Want to support me? Please support Craig on my behalf right now with anything you can spare, here: https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=RP6RDSPZVSA9N&source=url

I would consider it a very personal favor.

Thanks!

.

–Clint > richard-son (Realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Friday, July 2st, 2021

Dr. Andrew Kaufman’s Viral Disinformation


–=–
Introduction And Summary
–=–

The purpose of this research project is to refute and put to sleep the popular, socially harmful meme that:

  1. Viruses and indeed “germs” don’t exist, because apparently they don’t stand up to Koch’s postulates on bacteria.
  2. Viruses are actually spawned internally, such as exosomes, and somehow appear inside the body (terrain) without external forces.
  3. Therefore, the non-scientifically induced conclusion from these unproven ideas is that “Germ theory” is false. This loose paradigm is most often an attribution based off of a non-scientific, faith-based debate between germ theory and terrain theory.

After a deep dive into the subject, giving all neutrality and fairness to both sides of the apparent debate (actually, there was never any real debate, just a carefully crafted false dialectic), here is a summary of my conclusions, as shown and detailed in triplicate within the bulk of this research project:

  1. The idea of the “non-existence” of viruses and germs is a non-sequitur (non-starter), even and especially according to the sources provided to prove the fact. There is no evidence whatsoever to back the “viruses don’t exist” model.
  2. Koch’s postulates were never intended to be applied to viruses, only to bacteria, therefore they are simply not applicable to research into viral pathogens, a fact that even Koch himself was adamant about on the record. This factual history is obfuscated in any discourse, of course, to enforce the false narrative. History, be it true or false, is often used as a liar’s main weapon.
  3. Ironically, Bacteria are listed in the definition of what a “germ” is, so it is extremely disingenuous to suggest that germs don’t exist while also promoting Koch’s specific bacteriological Postulates as evidence thereof. On a side note, without the appropriately labeled germ line, there would be no human or other life on Earth. This is an essential point, a self-evident Truth that will be explained below, and which destroys the whole false paradigm.
  4. Most importantly, this entire paradigm rests on the clearly false dialectic (pre-meditated lie) that these two theories, germ and terrain theory, are somehow opposed to each other. In fact, they are very much compatible, complimentary, and in some ways quite dependent upon one another. A clean terrain (healthy systems of the body) is certainly more capable of responding to the presence of immunocompromising germs than a dirty or unhealthy terrain (such as that which causes a lowered immune system and response). Ultimately, this is another self-evident Truth. These two theories are not at all, in any way opposed to each other, except by the intentional manipulation and false dialectic provided by this so-called “Dr.” Kaufman and his parroting, profiteering cohorts, which is then repeated without understanding or scientific examination by their unwitting followers.

–=–
Comprehending The Nature Of The False Dialectic
–=–

Before we tackle the bulk of this false paradigm and expose what is obviously a deliberately misleading obfuscation and concerted twisting of facts, we must first rehash in our minds just what the Hegelian notion of this type of intentionally false dialectic consists of. It’s this concept of inventing and deliberating over a false dialectic instead of the actual positive scientific evidence held contrary to the false dialectic that must be understood here. The newly opposing dialectic acts as a sort of stand in, a fallacious strawman argument that is presented in the typical manner of Zetetic non-science, as a negatively closed consensus, where the burden of proof is passed from the inventor (based on a non-scientific methodology) to the skeptic. This new, negative theory is essentially a character attack on those that “believe” in what is scientifically known or currently best-theorized, or that is popular opinion.

And it’s very clever, casting faith-based doubt in the minds of the masses over that which they cannot actually see with their own eyes, despite the entirety of the published scientific methodology that offers meticulous proofs and photographic evidence and despite the open and active for-profit market of corporations that sell viruses and other germs for laboratory use. In other words, instead of proving that viruses don’t exist, which is in fact impossible (one cannot prove a negative), all others that “believe” in the popular comprehension of these physically unseen viruses are thus required to prove they do exist. But there are rules to this game, for at the same time the entirety of scientific and research journal materials submitted by all virologists and all other lab experiments around the world and throughout history are at the same time absolutely dismissed as unacceptable evidence. This, of course, leaves the scientific mind without any acceptable research or visual evidence while considering microscopic, unable-to-be-seen pathogens.

And so the false dialectic quite often relies not on proof of its own concept but of fallaciously “cancelling” that which is the proofs of the truth, creating in both sides of any argument the illusion of equal footing. This essentially boils down to a character assassination, but only after the scientific theory is turned into a meme, given a personification of sorts, so that those that support scientific outcome can be labeled as that persona, as virus-believers. Crazy germ lovers. Thus the character, the false persona created can then be attacked instead of the actual scientific evidence, even though there is no actual character to attack but what they create as part of their false dialectic.

We are constantly bombarded with such absurdities throughout social and other media platforms, be they mainstream or alternative. The resulting meme caused by the false dialectic is key to spreading and instilling a faith-based belief in the lie, by necessarily demonizing the truth and those that attempt to follow it. Even while 90% truth is being told within the false dialectic, the transplanted 10% lies and obfuscated facts are enough not only to mislead but to cause a denial of scientific thought and processes toward the determination of correct answers.

Let us refresh our understanding of the general Hegelian false dialectic by quoting from the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy:

–=–

1. Hegel’s description of his dialectical method

(Note: most citations removed for ease of reading.)

Hegel provides the most extensive, general account of his dialectical method in Part I of his Encyclopaedia of Philosophical Sciences, which is often called the Encyclopaedia Logic [EL]. The form or presentation of logic, he says, has three sides or moments. These sides are not parts of logic, but, rather, moments of “every concept”, as well as “of everything true in general” (we will see why Hegel thought dialectics is in everything in section 3). The first moment—the moment of the understanding—is the moment of fixity, in which concepts or forms have a seemingly stable definition or determination.

The second moment—the “dialectical” or “negatively rational” moment—is the moment of instability. In this moment, a one-sidedness or restrictedness in the determination from the moment of understanding comes to the fore, and the determination that was fixed in the first moment passes into its opposite. Hegel describes this process as a process of “self-sublation”. The English verb “to sublate” translates Hegel’s technical use of the German verb aufheben, which is a crucial concept in his dialectical method. Hegel says that aufheben has a doubled meaning: it means both to cancel (or negate) and to preserve at the same time. The moment of understanding sublates itself because its own character or nature—its one-sidedness or restrictedness—destabilizes its definition and leads it to pass into its opposite. The dialectical moment thus involves a process of self-sublation, or a process in which the determination from the moment of understanding sublates itself, or both cancels and preserves itself, as it pushes on to or passes into its opposite.

(Clint’s comment: The word sublate is defined as a verb, meaning to DENY. Thus, this sense of both preserving and also negating (pretending to “cancel”) that which is preserved leads to cognitive dissonance when armed with the well-organized false dialectic, which confuses or confounds the first or original fixed understanding. This is often labeled as “denialism.” But for the denial to exist and subsist, so too must the original theory be preserved. In other words, denial is like a parasite that cannot survive by itself. Denial must preserve the memory of its host to have purpose and meaning. Otherwise, the denialism itself would be open to cross-denial, to criticism, and to disproof. Thus that which is denied, the original, must be preserved in the false dialectic in order to redirect the brunt of criticism to the original. A parasite, like a virus, has no reason or intent and cannot therefore exist without its victimized, reprogrammed host. The false dialectic is necessarily a parasite, existing only to feed off of the denial and confusion created by its literal camouflage. The lie exists only to cover up and vampirically subsist on the truth. Thus the false dialectic cannot exist without the preservation of that which it parasites from. Or, considering Dr. Kaufman and his lies, one could say that the viral lie that is the false dialectic cannot be “isolated” from the host-truth. There is no purpose behind a virus (parasite) without an intended or accidental host. There is no purpose behind Kaufman’s false dialectic without an intention to reprogram the host theory. One cannot suggest that viruses don’t exist without the pre-existing and fixed idea that viruses exist in the first place. Without the original determination that viruses exist, there is no way to determine they don’t. The positive determination must come before the negative, dialectical dissolution. It cannot reasonably, scientifically, or logically stand on its own, lest it be immediately criticized and disproven. The host always inadvertently, unwittingly protects its parasite from harm.)

The third moment—the “speculative” or “positively rational momentgrasps the unity of the opposition between the first two determinations, or is the positive result of the dissolution or transition of those determinations. Here, Hegel rejects the traditional, reductio ad absurdum argument, which says that when the premises of an argument lead to a contradiction, then the premises must be discarded altogether, leaving nothing. As Hegel suggests in the Phenomenology, such an argument:

is just the skepticism which only ever sees pure nothingness in its result and abstracts from the fact that this nothingness is specifically the nothingness of that from which it results.

Although the speculative moment negates the contradiction, it is a determinate or defined nothingness because it is the result of a specific process. There is something particular about the determination in the moment of understanding—a specific weakness, or some specific aspect that was ignored in its one-sidedness or restrictedness—that leads it to fall apart in the dialectical moment. The speculative moment has a definition, determination or content because it grows out of and unifies the particular character of those earlier determinations, or is “a unity of distinct determinations. The speculative moment is thus “truly not empty, abstract nothing, but the negation of certain determinations”. When the result “is taken as the result of that from which it emerges”, Hegel says, then it is “in fact, the true result; in that case it is itself a determinate nothingness, one which has a content”. As he also puts it, “the result is conceived as it is in truth, namely, as a determinate negation [bestimmte Negation]; a new form has thereby immediately arisen”. Or, as he says, “[b]ecause the result, the negation, is a determinate negation [bestimmte Negation], it has a content. Hegel’s claim in both the Phenomenology and the Science of Logic that his philosophy relies on a process of “determinate negation [bestimmte Negation]” has sometimes led scholars to describe his dialectics as a method or doctrine of “determinate negation” (see entry on Hegel, section on Science of Logic; cf. Rosen 1982: 30; Stewart 1996, 2000: 41–3; Winfield 1990: 56).

–=–

It’s very important to understand that the biology of every false dialectic turns nothing into something, turns empty form into impossible substance, all due to the denial of the original or host form and its substance. When the parasite infects the host, something new is created, though nothing new is actually visible. The combination of host and parasite causes a perception of independent and subversive existence (the host acting against its own interest), just as any combination of men with plans is said to cause conspiracy (a plan between two or more people). The conspiracy is perceptional and relative to the combination. Without the combination, there is no conspiracy. Without the host, no virus can fulfill its purpose (plans). Without the original, the false dialectic has no reason to exist (it cannot be viral).

To be clear, there can be no negation of anything without there first being a positive thing to deny. Thus any denial of anything must preserve and negatively protect the positive (e.g., criticism) to promote the negation. This can be seen throughout our modern, so-called cancel culture. Cancelation is impossible without there first being a promotion (positive determination) to negate (cancel). Truth, in other words, must be preserved, highly controlled, and systematically criticized in order to promote a lie in its place. Without the truth, there is no lie.

What happens then, when, only after a state of unsubstantiated denial is mixed with a helping of cognitive dissonance, the false dialectic is established (that is, a dissonant and confusing preservation and equal perversion in the mind of the existence of that which is at the same time already denied — two seemingly correct determinations that stand opposed to each other considered to be equally true in the same spectrum)? The answer: that original truth, which is necessarily denied is in the mind determinately negated through fallacious logic, turning into the purest rarified product of denial, which is nihilism (belief in nothingness). Can nothing have substance? Can that which is not believed in also take up space in reality? Thanks to the false dialectic, that’s exactly what seems to happen in the mind of the dialectically (parasitically) infected. Nothing becomes something instead of nothing.

–=–
Gleaming The God Of Nothingness
–=–

As the best and most powerful example of the false dialectic, we must examine just how this strange concept of having a belief in the non-existence of anything (nihilism) is the key to maintaining every false dialectic. Examples of this type of false dialectic can be seen all over the sphere of our post-modernist, logic-based society, the greatest of negatively positive determinations (nihilistic rationales) being the non-existence of “God.”

But before this type of false dialectic can be established in the logic-center of the brain, the actual meaning of the word “God” must be targeted as a subject of denial. In other words, the non-belief in “God” requires the preservation of the truth that lies behind the concept of “God”, and so the entire argument against existence lies within the very possibility of existence. There is no purpose behind non-belief except as a direct opposition to that which is believed in the first place. Thus, as I covered in my last book, the actual NAME of God, translated as YHVH, was all but removed from modern “versions” of the Bible. The word itself, of course, predates the Bible. In other words, it was not the Bible that created “God” or Its meaning, but rather the Bible used the already well-established and defined term YHVH (properly pronounced Jehovah) as the NAME of the specific conception of what the actual Supreme Being of “God” is. Of the over 6,000 instances of the term YHVH used in older foreign language Bibles, only a handful of references to that NAME remain. In it’s stead was placed words like God, Lord, Master, and other non-descript, non-defined terms of the English arts. Therefore, the intended, fixed, and unchanging meaning of the word YHVH, after being replaced by such undefined terms as God and Lord, can in modern times be ignorantly disputed or denied.

So how does this word-magic qualify as a deliberate false dialectic?

The meaningless term God (e.g. Ba’al) was used to replace the very deliberate and meaningful term YHVH, causing and instant confusion of this terminology used throughout the Bible. The intent and meaning of the word (NAME) is completely lost to these replacement terms, being mere flattering titles rather than a specific, well-defined and understood, self-evidently True NAME. In other words, like the name “Germ,” the name YHVH as originally intended and defined was never intended to be debated, never intended to be denied, for to deny YHVH is to deny Existence Itself, to deny self-Existent, self-Evident Truth, to deny all Life, and to deny all of Nature and Its Law (LOGOS). This is to say that to deny YHVH is to deny the Existence of Existence (GOD), which is the very highest form of nihilism, the greatest religious false dialectic ever known to man. And it was as easy as wiping from memory the meaning of a single noun (name).

How is this particular false dialectic played out to the masses?

It’s quite clever, really. By inventing a strawman or false dialectical image of “god” to replace the specific NAME, a generic and specifically non-defined title that is undefined and generally anthropomorphized into some form of man or other personification within the halls of corporate religion, the entirety of the many denominations of so-called “Christian” religions as well as all men that do not adhere to such a legal corporate religious structure (so-called atheists and agnostics), or in other words the entire population of Earth have been sold a “God” that has no Name, no reason, and no definition. It’s a do-it-yourself God, where you choose what the word God means to you. And so the concept of belief and non-belief (a false dialectic) were introduced to a concept that was never intended to be questioned or denied. Those who do not go to “church” and who say they do not believe in “God” are fallaciously basing their opinion, their theory of “God” on this man-made– or rather, church-made rebranding and redefining of what was once a self-evident understanding of the Supreme Being. The word Being is a verb, an action, representing Life and Existence Itself, yet the modern delusion of the undefined, legal-corporate religion-based “God” that so many deny has been dialectically inverted into a noun, not the action of Being but a personification thereof. “God” was turned into an empty word with no Life, something outside or superior to Nature, to Existence, like some overseer watching his chemistry set from beyond. Yet nothing in the Bible supports this false dialectic. And in fact, as YHVH is mentioned only a few times in the modern English (dog-Latin) Bible, the NAME and Its meaning and intention is preserved in a way that allows it to be used as a host presiding over Its own dialectical denial, without which there would be no need for the word God.

It’s amazing to consider this dialectic, for the word God is actually used to “cancel” YHVH and Its meaning from the consciousness of man, completely altering the Bible and its message, and causing without exception an institutionalized mistranslation of the entire Bible thereof. It has caused man to deny his own reason for existence, the ultimate of nihilistic false dialecticals.

As for the term YHVH, as that which is and always has had a stable, unchanging definition as that which is Fixed, Permanent, unchanging, Self-Evident, and Self-Existent, as Existence Itself, was purposefully confounded and confused so that this meaning was lost. And this created a sense of grandiose cognitive dissonance, a denial of that which is self-evidently Existent. Here we find the second part of Hegel’s dialectic fulfilled, in that,

“…the “dialectical” or “negatively rational” moment—is the moment of instability. In this moment, a one-sidedness or restrictedness in the determination from the moment of understanding comes to the fore, and the determination that was fixed in the first moment passes into its opposite. Hegel describes this process as a process of “self-sublation”. The English verb “to sublate” translates Hegel’s technical use of the German verb aufheben, which is a crucial concept in his dialectical method. Hegel says that aufheben has a doubled meaning: it means both to cancel (or negate) and to preserve at the same time.”

A loose translation might be to fool oneself by applying negative logic built on ignorance, or rather denial of the positive.

First the false dialectic of the empty word “God” is created, a strawman argument and false persona invented to specifically be attacked instead of the already well-known, unquestioned, and indeed quite fixed meaning of YHVH. Thus a new dialectical based on false information is established, being in and of itself quite negatively rational, for the actual Truth (YHVH) is not attacked, only the false replacement, the strawman generically called “God.” But when the population effected by the fallacy does not know the difference between the NAME YHVH and the generic term God, then what was fixed for so long suddenly “passes into its opposite.” The second moment needed for the false dialectic to be established and believed without proof is thus come to fruition.

Now all that is needed is the final moment, the final step leading to a faith-based false belief that both negates and preserves at the same time the Truth (origin), creating a state of institutionalized cognitive dissonance that feels to the believer to be a constant battle to maintain and defend, to the point where everyone else appears to the believer of the false dialectic to be in denial of what they themselves are actually in denial of. This sense of persecution is, more than anything, the driver behind the desire to defend and preserve the false dialectic. The church calls this as its right to propaganda mixed with the right of dispensation, or in other words, the act of peaceful or violent, voluntary or forced-evangelism.

At this point, the contradictions of the Bible toward these beliefs are completely and irrationally ignored, causing a constant and often degrading cognitive dissonance that includes the negation (denial) of certain false assumptions or determinations (incorrect opinions). Again, the strawman argument is considered defeated, so that the false dialectic may appear victorious and proven in the mind.

“God” does not exist. This is a true statement, but only when applied to the manmade images, symbols, and personifications invented around the false paradigm of the unknown term “God” invented to cause confusion and cognitive dissonance. And so, though it may sound like blasphemy to those infected by the parasitic false dialectic, the empty term God is a parasite that exists only to obfuscate the Truth of what “God” is actually supposed to be understood as, that is, as YHVH in its original intention.

The correct terminology for understanding is simply that: YHVH is Existence. Or, as the Bible instructs, YHVH is TRUTH. Thus, to deny YHVH is to deny Existence, to deny Truth. No wonder there is so much (purposeful) confusion within the false dialectic of Biblical religions. For this corporate Christianity necessarily must preserve the True God (YHVH) in order to, at the same time, present its own false dialectical of its own non-descript replacement (vicar) with no name or meaning but the flattering title of “God”. And so, in a feat of pure evil genius, both religious and non-religious men have been tricked into worshiping nihilism as their God, be it through false imagery (idolatry) or through the artificially induced dialectical of denialism known as nihilism.

–=–
The Matrix: Life In The Dialectic
–=–

Now, if we were to apply this three-step paradigm of illogical assumption that is the false dialectic to almost everything we do in legal society, we would find ourselves so bound up in this web of lies expounded upon by Hagel that one might say we live in a complete matrix (simulation) built solely upon these false dialectics. Be it religion, politics, history, legalism, money, education, or any other fictional institution of the arts we treat falsely and worship and practice as the Truth (God), we find a well-organized system of nihilistic processes. For any false dialectic to work the Truth must always be both sacrificed and at the same time fallaciously preserved for the dialectic to inflict the cognitive dissonance and parasitic denialism it needs to exist. That which is not self-existent (dependent on man’s opinion) is not that which is of YHVH (self-Evident, self-Existence). The false dialectic always exists dependent (parasitic) on some other dialectic, thus can never be Truth (YHVH) in and of its self.

The moral of this example story is simply this, to believe in YHVH is to not believe in, or more to the point to never put power or respect in anything manmade. YHVH is Truth, and only the Truth (YHVH) will set you free. Two songs come to mind…

Imagine being saved by zero beliefs…

Imagine no false dialectics…

Imagine only Truth.

Now, let us apply this understanding of the false dialectic model, putting on our long unused hats of neutrality, unloading our prejudices, and clearing our minds so as to uncover just what is this false dialectic being streamlined by the pretender Doctor named Andrew Kaufman.

–=–
The Movement Of Truth:
Scientific Methodology VS. Dialectical Beliefs
–=–

Greetings fellow Truth-seekers. And by this, to be clear, I mean those who seek the Truth at any and every cost, even at the expense and pretended comfort of one’s own ego, imagined reputation, commercial gain, and even when it requires standing up against the prevalent “cancel-culture” that thrashes truth-tellers into silence or outright obscurity. If that’s not you, or if you still believe the meme that there can possibly be two “alternative” sides of the singularly perfect Truth, then this article and indeed this blog is certainly not for you. For the Truth has no versions, no sides, and no alternatives. The Truth needs no dialectic or belief from men to exist, that is, TO BE EXISTENCE (YHVH) ISTSELF. Most importantly, for those caught up in the matrix of lies and disinformation presently choking the life out of every legitimate media source out there, we must always remember that only the Truth will set you free, and the Truth Exists whether you like it or agree with it or not. You’ve been served…

Unfortunately, this term “truth” has been coopted by various devils and daemons masquerading as one of us. And, without contemplating our own dispositions, by so virally infecting our minds with such unverifiable, faith-based untruths, many of us have unwittingly become one of them, parroting with a sense of desperate, desolate sincerity and unintended treachery what we want to believe is the Truth. We therefore become the very daemons (guides/dividers) of these false, predatory prophets. And yes, many have turned from reason to a purely logical critique, ignoring the proper methods of scientific research and debate toward this cancelation policy when we don’t like what we hear as an educated response – especially when a lack of self-responsibility or just willing ignorance is the real problem. It only takes one tool used by one unwitting fool to inoculate disinformation into so many others with ones own brand of repeated, unvetted, fallacious rhetoric — or, for that matter, one psychologically reprograming agent provocateur’ to do the same. I take no pleasure in stating these Truths about our collective, willful parroting and movement of disinformation as “news.” But it must be stated, at the risk of this cancelation policy we pretend to be offended by while in the same breath using it indiscriminately ourselves, that the infection of mass delusion and willful ignorance amongst the most Truth-seeking among us has been relabeled and commodified as the often ambiguously nonsensical and wholly ineffectual “alternative news.”

Today, I must put back on the hat that has gotten me chastised, banned, generally dismissed, and sometimes socially cancelled from the so-called “truth” movement (an assorted web of well-laid, interconnected logical fallacies and false dialectics), in order to once again smash the lies that are causing exactly what the Bible warns us against — that we shall be both saved by and destroyed by knowledge, or the willful lack thereof. Unfortunately, on one side, the term knowledge is translated into false information, as lies and false dialectics being worshiped as perceived, faith-based truths, or what the Bible refers to as our own, self-destructively ignorant force — an abandonment of scientific methodologies mixed with a turning away from even self-evident Truths (YHVH). Yet the Truth, that is, knowledge of and therefore practice only of what is Truth is the only practice that will save us. Faith in the Truth, that the Truth must and will overcome, is the foundation of spirituality — not to be confused with modern spiritualists or other “New Age” type logics and mysticisms. Such information and symbols of the real should not be confused with True knowledge, any more than technology (art) should in any way be confused with True Science as conducted using the “scientific method.” Technology (artifice) is opposed to science, for art is never Truth and proper science seeks only the Truth. Modern so-called “science” is but a flattering title, a brand name used to hide the Truth – that modern science is really just modern art (technology), a new age religion called Scientism.

For those that don’t understand the difference between Natural science (the study of Nature) and this cult of scientism that seeks to re-evolve and reorganize Nature to its own image, please watch my documentary on the subject, here:

See 02:43:00 for section on “scientism”

–=–

The art of lying should never be given a place amongst us, on any platform or “news” outlet, nor should any flattering title be respected as proof of lies labeled as the truth. For that reason, today I put my own primary research up against one of the most prolific liars and provocateurs I’ve seen, Dr. Andrew Kaufman. This research tome is designed to lift people out of what is becoming a cult of personality, a new form of cancel-culture, as that which shuns and pretends discredit to anyone that “believes” in what are called as viruses. As ridiculous as this notion really is, I simply cannot stand the thought of so many people being led astray while in the middle of the viral biological weapons attack that this genetically modified, gain of function induced “coronavirus” is. This wolf in doctor’s clothing must be stopped. But only you can stop him, for his existence requires belief in him and the lies he tells. Are you still able to recover from your own false beliefs? Are you able to still view in neutrality the following research that absolutely, 100% disproves this unfounded notion that viruses don’t exist?

To be clear, I have the utmost respect of anyone that in turn respectably points out to me an untruth that has mistakenly worked its way in to my own psyche, and therefore becomes embedded into my works, my writings, my movies, my rhetoric, etc. For we are all horrifyingly susceptible to the art of the lie, of succumbing to the liar, and ultimately of becoming party to the lie, from religion and scientism to even the most innocent and sincere of the fallacious concepts (logics) of men (the low-hanging fruit of the tree of knowledge). Therefore, I respectably must attempt to correct the current lies being put forward to the “alternative” masses about viruses and germ theory. If you seek the Truth, this is dedicated to you. If you have faith-based beliefs in the designs of men or that you should be listening to those that claim to present “both sides and let you decide,” the very mantra of Fox News, then you really need to consider the side where Truth lives. Truth has only one home, one side.

Dr. Andrew Kaufman, to name but one instigator and provocateur’ among several, has been making rounds on the alternative, so-called “truth” airways spreading a cornucopia of disinformation, suggesting his admitted, purely personal BELIEF without any methodology of science backing it up, that “viruses don’t exist” and that “exosomes are viruses.” Like the typical self-help guru, his completely unverified theory implies that all so-called infectious or virulent disease (i.e. viruses) actually develop from inside the body, and not exterior from it. Not surprisingly though, for a not so modest chunk of change, the discredited and ostracized so-called “Dr.” Kaufman will provide products and services that are conveniently available for heavily re-tailed purchase to ease you of this body-burden, not forgetting a consultation fee from hell. This nonsense tactic of covert advertising is amazingly being used as the foundation of a whole meme-based movement, yet another alternative matrix web to get caught up in, parroted openly and without proofs even while the viral SARS-Cov2 agent and its syndrome (Covid-19) is being virally spread all over the world. This is not irony, for as my documentaries show, this genetically modified coronavirus is doing exactly what it was redesigned and given gain-of-function (man-made mutation) orthologues to do.

This belief in the non-existence of “viruses” is becoming so prevalent that it’s interfering with even basic conversational exchanges on the subject. In other words, one cannot talk of a “virus” without being accused of some sort of strange heresy, as if belief in what is viral, foul, contagious matter external from the human body is somehow sacrilege to the New Age religion of Zetetic, Scientistic (unscientific) thought. And so, I am helplessly watching as many friends and colleagues fall deeply into these lies, picking up the torch of scientism and practically crucifying anyone that attempts to speak with actual scientific research behind his rhetoric, no matter how self-evident or well-understood that knowledge is. Information (art) is the new, false religion of science; the consensus-building social influencer is today the new “scientist.” And it is spreading at a pace that can only be called as Biblical. So rampant has this meme become that many approach the subject like fundamentalist religionists, believing they have uncovered the secrets of the cabal, of the universe, and of the human body, and therefore presenting the information as a spiritual awakening instead of as what it actually is — a scientific inquiry with the goal of finding evidential and experiential Truth.

A proper, scientifically bound theory is neutrally proposed with the sole purpose of being tested, vetted, scrutinized at all angles, and finally verified, repeated, or disproven. The scientifically-bound theory has no beginning and no end, for the purpose of the theory is in fact to be improved upon or eventually disproved. There is no final theory, only the best observable facts. However, in Zetetic, Scientistic, faith-based or consensus-based belief systems, the role of the theory is reversed; inverted to the point that the theory stands immediately as Truth upon its conception and therefore transfigured into an idol. Through this inversion, the non-scientifically-bound theory stands firm in the mind and is not subject to data that might disprove or alter that theory. This is no different than any other religious belief. Instead of a guidepost pointing toward and encouraging further research, the theory becomes an impassable barrier to further study or open dialog. A scientifically-bound theory invites failure and disproof. A Scientistic, consensus-based theory is used as a blunt weapon to beat down all dissenting data, discussion, and proofs against it. When theory becomes law in the mind of unwittingly ignorant believers, then it can no longer be justified to be called as a theory, and certainly has no place in the scientific methodology.

Meanwhile, indeed, my people are being destroyed on many fronts by technical information (terms of art), a matrix of synthetic biological code virally sweeping through the dualistically ignorant and unbelieving population. In short, we are being told we should not believe in the virus that is currently infecting us and our friends and family. What better way to destroy a people than to cause them to be blind to the very synthetically re-engineered biological weapon introduced to control, subdue, make helplessly afraid and ill, and ultimately sterilize, maim, or kill them?

By this logic, if I simply don’t believe in a gun or a Taser, then they can never hurt me, right?

–=–
Scheming Memes Made Of Dirty Words
–=–

It’s very important to understand the power of words and how they influence our grasp of reality. Part of the problem is that belief in any word in and of itself causes reality to dissipate behind the perception of the meaning and true application of the word. In other words, a talented trickster can make someone deny reality by redefining or outright denying the word that represents it. If one can be made to dismiss the representation, the symbol, the word or the science behind the word, then one can be made to dismiss the truth altogether. By denying the power, intent, and purpose behind the word used to describe something real, it is the real that is made to appear unreal by the perception of the beholder. Just as beauty lies in the eye (spirit) of the beholder, so too is the truth susceptible to the power of the mind, of false information. In a very strange happenstance, the beholder develops a divergent sort of prejudice against the word, and often a dystopian view of whatever intention or truth lies behind that term of art.

So let’s start by examining the two key words that re-present that backbone of this false debate. Those words are germ and virus. To do so, we must be extremely careful not to apply our own perceived, prejudicial meaning that suits our own egotistical belief system. Instead, we must call on the power of neutrality, learning what was in the first place intended for us to understand by the use of that word. For this, we must venture back in time, to the origin of the word we seek to understand. At the same time, we must remain in a state of neutrality, a mode of learning without prejudice or pretended foreknowledge, releasing ourselves from the currently circulating mob mentality and disinformation campaigns that lead us astray in the first place. It is often the case that before we may learn the Truth, we must unlearn everything else. We must view the subject from a fresh, unbiased perspective, humbling ourselves and restraining our social and political lusts. We must become as children, learning without preconception.

Before we start, let us first acknowledge that these terms virus and germ are intended to be specific (special) terms used only in the art of science and medicine, and therefore carry a meaning that is not general, not the same as its common definition. Every art has its own terms, and this must be understood before moving on.

TERM OF ARTspecial word or phrase used in relation to a particular subject or activity (Cambridge Dictionary)

These terms of art, virus and germ, therefore, must be relearned in order to both know and not misdiagnose their meanings in our common parlance. If you are going to use medical and scientific terminology in your discourse, then you must understand what that terminology means in that separate, private realm of the language arts.

There are three main tenets to Dr. Kaufman’s false claim:

  1. viruses don’t exist.
  2. exosomes are self-created viruses.
  3. germ theory is false while terrain theory is true.

These three arguments are presented separately, meaning they are not co-dependent on each other. This is to say that disproving one theory does not disprove the others. Together, they form an extremely unvetted and yet loosely relative theory by Dr. Andrew Kaufman. In order to show why this theory is provably false, we must first examine each of these terms of art (words) and their usage by Kaufman and those that parrot his extremely fallible fable.

The most logical place to start here is in the etymological history of this word virus, discovering where it originated and what it was intended to mean in the various language arts of old. If you should suddenly find yourself feeling like this detailed inquiry into the Truth is becoming threatening to your current belief system, you should. But this is not a bad thing. You are only a beneficiary of scientific enquiry and Truth if you choose to be.

Virus (n.) – late 14c., “poisonous substance,” from Latin virus “poison, sap of plants, slimy liquid, a potent juice,” from Proto-Italic *weis-o-(s-) “poison,” which is probably from a PIE root *ueis-, perhaps originally meaning “to melt away, to flow,” used of foul or malodorous fluids, but with specialization in some languages to “poisonous fluid” (source also of Sanskrit visam “venom, poison,” visah “poisonous;” Avestan vish- “poison;” Latin viscum “sticky substance, birdlime;” Greek ios “poison,” ixos “mistletoe, birdlime;” Old Church Slavonic višnja “cherry;” Old Irish fi “poison;” Welsh gwy “poison“). The meaning “agent that causes infectious disease” is recorded by 1728 (in reference to venereal disease); the modern scientific use dates to the 1880s. The computer sense is from 1972. (etymonline.org)

viral (adj.) – “of the nature of, or caused by, a virus,” 1944, see virus + -al (1). Sense of “become suddenly widely popular through internet sharing” is attested by 1999, originally in reference to marketing and based on the similarity of the effect to the spread of a computer virus. Related: Virally. (etymonline.org)

Well, that certainly changes things, now doesn’t it?

The word virus comes from the etymological meaning of poison or foul contagious matter.

So what does this first big step do to your belief that “viruses don’t exist” or that we create viruses only in our bodies? If you are being neutral and seeking knowledge, then this must mean you don’t believe in poison. You don’t believe in venomous frogs or snakes. And that snake bit you had as a kid wasn’t therefor the cause of the severe infection you got immediately after the bite? And so, for this belief to be stated accurately when referring to any and every published definition of the word virus, you must therefore believe that poison (virus) or venom (virus) cannot harm you, because poison (virus) doesn’t actually exist. My, isn’t that a conundrum?

Now before you start attacking the messenger instead of the message, let’s examine further our common, dumbed-down, dog-Latin (English) language. In the older languages from which our current, literalized slave-language English was copied, butchered, and derived from , the words they spoke were not just empty vessels of literalness, not just insubstantial nouns (names), but instead carried with them the notion of some familiar anomaly of action, description, or attribute. In the case of this word virus, it was only ever meant to be understood and used as that which is “poisonous.”

But now we need to define poison, and so on, and so forth.

I can personally assure you that the bushy irritant called “Poison Ivy” exists, and that its title is appropriate to express the viral nature of its rash and itch-causing oil. After all, I was once victim to such an interaction if it upon my man-flesh. Ouch! But let us consider why this plant is called as a poison (virus – meaning viral). The answer, again, is because it contains on its greenery a viscous, foul, contagious matter (oil) that is poisonous (viral) to human skin. If all I had to do was say I don’t believe in Poison Ivy or its viral matter and all that bubbling rash and itchiness would go away, that would certainly be a medical breakthrough. But whether or not I believe in virus (poison), virus certainly believes in me.

Let me give you another example. How about sexually transmitted diseases? They are certainly viral, as statistics show, meaning they spread and corrupt indiscriminately upon certain sexually simulated contact, right? But the prison psychiatrist Kaufman claims virus grows in the body. So, does that mean Dr. Kaufman has every sexually transmitted disease known to man in his manly man parts just waiting to grow randomly and cause symptoms? Is that in his dating website profile? And isn’t it odd that his symptoms only actually happen when he gets desperate and hires a prostitute, paying extra for no condemns (just as a fictional example, of course)? That’s about as legitimate and believable as when I was told by my short-lived ex-girlfriend that my particular viral, sexually transmitted infection probably came from a toilet seat! Then I asked, what about these little crabs? Again, I’m sorry to say, I certainly experienced this particular virus in my younger, more care free days, and it felt like a glass rod was broken inside my thingy while a hundred miniature Hobbits were digging for root vegetables in preparation for second dinner around my collective pubic hairs.

Hey, if we can’t be honest and speak of our past mistakes and misplaced trusts, what will we ever accomplish in real life?

But as the influencer– err, oh; I mean psychiatry “doctor” has suggested, perhaps you don’t believe in viruses, and therefore don’t believe in sexually transmitted diseases? If only I knew this back then, I could have simply twinkled my nose, snapped my fingers, and just non-believed like some magical spell and presto, no viral disease! And it wouldn’t have felt like my dickie-doo was transported temporarily to a burning hell full of broken glass when I took a pee-pee. But alas, my belief in the existence of Gonorrhea being an actual viral infection kept me in unnecessary pain, and so experientially I can say to you that yes, it painfully exists.

Unfortunately, I can also assure you that crabs are very much a viral parasite too: “... An obligate ectoparasite with a ROUND BODY and large claws. The terminal part of each leg has CLAW-LIKE APPENDAGES whose grasp is designed to match the diameter of pubic or axillary hair. They can tell when they have hit a blood vessel when beginning to feed by SENSING CHEMICALS RELEASED at the site of the wound.” (–Crab louse (nih.gov))

Remember that term, obligate parasite. We’ll come back to it shortly.

Now, the astute reader will surely be saying or thinking right now: that Clint is an idiot – he’s saying the clap is a viral infection, and he seems to not know that Gonorrhea is a bacteria not a virus. Crabs certainly aren’t viruses, man

Silly rabbit…

The logical thought process you should have is not I’m right he’s wrong, but rather, I’m curious what his definition of the word “virus” is compared to my own, and I wonder what his perception of what a virus actually is in reality could be as compared to my own perceptions? Maybe we should confer and make sure we are speaking the same language.

You know, the secret to True Peace and Love is in that last sentence, my friends.

Oh, what a world it would be…

Metaphorically, “Dr.” Kaufman’s line of bullshit, his carefully scripted set of hand-selected words, is just as viral as any sexually transmitted disease, bacterial or otherwise. It infects and poisons the mind, alters the normalized programing, and causes unhealthy symptoms of mainstreameitis and its opposite, conspiratardness. His lies are poisonous. Get the idea? Bacteria are pathogenic, which means infectious. They spread virally (infectiously) the more contact we have with each other.

But here’s another conundrum… How can you believe in bacterium if you don’t believe in viruses? Are you aware that germ theory includes both bacterium and viruses, calling both as germs? So if you don’t believe in germ theory, how can you believe in bacteria, and even more interestingly, how can you believe in Koch’s postulates for detection of the germ called as bacteria?

Oh dear, that’s a tough one.

Is bacteria an infection? Is bacteria therefore infectious? Bacteria aren’t viruses, but are bacteria viral in their spread? Bacteria isn’t a viral infection, but it spreads virally, just as false information does. The problem is not what actually happens in Nature (Reality), the problem is that the words used to describe what happens in Reality have multiple different meanings, intents, and representations. Every word is at least a double-edged sword.

Is bacteria considered a poison? Of course. And this brings up another ailment I’ve had experience with, that of food poisoning. Bacteria and viruses are well-known agents in the cause of food poisoning. But if you don’t believe in viruses, and thus don’t believe in poison, then you don’t really need a stomach pumping, right? And if you don’t believe in germs, and bacteria is a germ, then you don’t believe in food poisoning. Man, this is getting weird. You didn’t actually need anti-biotics for bad bacteria, because you don’t believe in infectious matter spread by bacteria that would make you sick in the first place, right? And when a doctor tells you that no, you can’t cure a virus infection with antibiotics because they only work on bacteria, you must disagree with the doctor because germs, including bacteria, don’t exist, right? I suppose you had no zits either, because you don’t believe in pus (virus).

You see how ridiculous and futile this exercise is becoming? And yes, it’s meant to be really annoying to you. It worked!

I got bitten by a Black Widow spider years ago and ended up in the hospital on an I.V. and some anti-viral medicine. If venom is virus, then this course of action makes a whole lot of sense. It saved my life, bringi my temperature down from 104 within just a couple hours. It was one of the few times I actually had a good experience and outcome in a hospital setting!

Black widow venom treatment – In the most severe cases, your doctor may inject you with antivenin. It’s a drug made from substances in the blood of horses. Antivenin neutralizes the black widow’s venom (virus). That means it prevents it from causing you harm.

In case you are wondering, the definition of Venin is – any of several poisonous substances occurring in snake venom. So snake bites are a form of virus (poison)? Absolutely. Duh! But you don’t believe in viruses, right?

Let’s fast forward from these etymological sources to Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language to see what a virus was considered to be in 1828:

VIRUS – noun – [Latin See Virulent.] Foul or contagious matter of an ulcer, pustule, etc.; poison.

VIRULENT – adjective – [Latin virulentus, from virus, poison, that is, strength, from the same root as vir, vireo. See Venom.] 1. Extremely active in doing injury; very poisonous or venomous. No poison is more virulent than that of some species of serpents. 2. Very bitter in enmity; malignant; as a virulent invective.

VENOM – noun – [Latin venenum, venor, to hunt, to drive or chase; venio, to come. See Venus, etc.] 1. Poison; matter fatal or injurious to lifeVenom is generally used to express noxious matter that is applied externally, or that is discharged from animals, as that of bites and stings of serpents, scorpions, etc.; and poison, to express substances taken into the stomach. 2. Spite; malice. – verb transitive – To poison; to infect with venom [Little Used, but envenom is in use and elegant. Venom may be elegantly used in poetry.]

VENUS – noun – [Latin ventus, venenum; Eng. venom to poison, to fret or irritate. These affinities lead to the true origin of these words. The primary sense of the root is to shoot or rush, as light or wind. From light is derived the sense of white, fair, venus or it is from opening, parting; and from rushing, moving, comes wind, and the sense of raging, fury, whence Latin venenum, poison, that which frets or causes to rage. These words all coincide with Latin venio, which signifies to rush, to fall, to happen; venor, to hunt, etc. The Greeks had the same idea of the goddess of love, viz. that her name signified fairness, whiteness, and hence the fable that she sprung from froth, whence her Green name.] 1. In mythology, the goddess of beauty and love; that is, beauty or love deified; just as the Gaelic and Irish Diana, swiftness, impetuosity, is denominated the goddess of hunting. 2. In astronomy, one of the inferior planets, whose orbit is between the earth and Mercury; a star of brilliant splendor. 3. In the old chimistry, a name given to copper.

–=–

Author’s Note: I find it poetically fulfilling to discover the usage of ancient terms in the romantic (non-literal) languages. Here, like the effect of a virus, of poison, and of the venomous snake, the feeling of love (i.e. lust) falls upon us, rushing metaphorically through our veins like an infectious pathogen, filling us with unplanned passion. Imagine if you were able to speak with such abandon of rule and prejudice, instead of the rote, dead, slave language called as dog-Latin “English” that we all try and make sound pretty, and which most often causes semantic disputes that have nothing to do with reality. Case in point…

POISON – noun – poiz’n. [Latin pus.] 1. A substance which, when taken into the stomach, mixed with the blood or applied to the skin or flesh, proves fatal or deleterious by an action not mechanical; venom. The more active and virulent poisons destroy life in a short time; others are slow in their operation, others produce inflammation without proving fatal. In the application of poison much depends on the quantity. 2. Any thing infectious, malignant, or noxious to health; as the poison of pestilential diseases. 3. That which taints or destroys moral purity or health; as the poison of evil example; the poison of sin.verb transitive – To infect with any thing fatal to life; as, to poison an arrow. 1. To attack, injure or kill by poison. He was so discouraged that he poisoned himself and died. 2 Macc. 2. To taint; to mar; to impair; as, discontent poisons the happiness of life. Hast thou not With thy false arts poison’d his people’s loyalty? 3. To corrupt. Our youth are poisoned with false notions of honor, or with pernicious maxims of government. To suffer the thoughts to be vitiated, is to poison the fountains of morality.

Poison is ANYTHING viral (virulent). Get over it already.

As science advanced, and before it turned into the current institutional cult of scientism, we should at this point understand the difference between what is a bacterial infection and an infection caused by a virus. This is a fairly simple task, of course:

–=–

“The pandemic has made clear the threat that some viruses pose to people. But viruses can also infect life-sustaining bacteria and a Johns Hopkins University-led team has developed a test to determine if bacteria are sick, similar to the one used to test humans for COVID-19.

“If there was a COVID-like pandemic occurring in important bacterial populations it would be difficult to tell, because before this study, we lacked the affordable and accurate tools necessary to study viral infections in uncultured bacterial populations,” said study corresponding author Sarah Preheim, a Johns Hopkins assistant professor of environmental health and engineering.

The findings were published today in Nature Microbiology.

Sick bacteria are stymied in their function as decomposers and as part of the foundation of the food web in the Chesapeake Bay and other waterways. Determining viral infections in bacteria traditionally relies on culturing both bacteria and virus, which misses 99% of bacteria found in the environment because they cannot be grown in culture, Preheim says, adding that tests of viral infections in uncultured bacteria are expensive and difficult to apply widely, not unlike the early stages of COVID-19 testing.

The key to making a test of viral infections for uncultured bacteria faster and more affordable was to isolate single bacterial cells in a small bubble (i.e. an emulsion droplet) and fuse the genes of the virus and bacteria together once inside.

The fused genes act like name tags for the bacteria and viruses,” said lead author Eric Sakowski, a former postdoctoral researcher in Preheim’s laboratory who is now an assistant professor at Mount St. Mary’s University. “By fusing the genes together, we are able to identify which bacteria are infected, as well as the variant of the virus that is causing the infection.

The resulting test provides a novel way to screen for viral infections in a subset of bacterial populations. The test allows researchers to identify a link between environmental conditions and infections in Actinobacteria, one of the most abundant bacterial groups in the Chesapeake Bay and one that plays a crucial role in decomposing organic matter, making nutrients available to plants and photosynthetic algae.

Though the researchers developed this tool studying the Chesapeake Bay, they say their approach could be widely applied across aquatic ecosystems, shedding light on viral ecology and helping predict — and even prevent — devastating environmental impacts.

“This testing tool allows us to track viral infections more easily, so we can monitor these infections to see when they are most likely to have important environmental consequences,” Preheim said.

Sakowski said the new test could someday also affect how we treat bacterial infections.

Viruses show potential for treating infections caused by antibiotic-resistant bacteria,” he said. “Knowing which viruses most effectively infect bacteria will be critical to this type of treatment.

Preheim’s team also included Johns Hopkins doctoral student Keith Arora-Williams, and Funing Tian, Ahmed A. Zayed, Olivier Zablocki, and Matthew B. Sullivan, all from the Ohio State University. Support was provided by the National Science Foundation and the Gordon E. and Betty I. Moore Foundation.

–=–

I know, I know, you don’t believe in viruses, so this whole study must be part of the conspiracy to promote the germ theory, despite the fact that there are literally thousands of similar published, reproducible studies on viruses? Bastards.

But here we come to understand that even Kaufman’s precious weapon and uninformed talking point on bacteria, used to promote Koch’s postulates against the existence of viruses, can actually be virally infected. LOL! That certainly throws a monkey wrench into that particular theory. Perhaps bacteria also grow spontaneous viruses inside of them, Mr. Kaufman? By this logic, I can grow snake venom in my body and poison myself to death. If that’s true, then perhaps I will someday spontaneously combust before I’m self-poisoned, though neither sounds like a good death.

The more I look into the origins and oddities of this disinformation campaign against viruses, the more I am reminded of the cancel-culture phenomenon playing out in social media today. While I attempt to provide as much evidence and proofs as possible on the table, the “viruses don’t exist” crowd is quickly becoming a canceler of the legitimacy of anyone that speaks of viruses, including the typical trolls and drive-by commenters on many websites.

But let us pause for a moment and go back to the notion that viruses are parasitic by their nature. Parasite is a loose term, and we need to acknowledge the following…

“Viruses are obligate intracellular parasites that hijack cellular pathways to complete their life cycle.” (see source below).

PARASITE – noun – [Latin parasita; Gr. by, and corn.] 1. In ancient Greece, a priest or minister of the gods whose office was to gather of the husbandman the corn allotted for public sacrifices. The parasites also superintended the sacrifices. 2. In modern usage, a trencher friend; one that frequents the tables of the rich and earns his welcome by flattery; a hanger on; a fawning flatterer. 3. In botany, a plant growing on the stem or branch of another plant and receiving its nourishment from it, as the mistletoe.  (–Webster’s 1828)

INOCULATE – verb transitive – [Latin inoculo; in and occulus, the eye.] 1. To bud; to insert the bud of a tree or plant in another tree or plant, for the purpose of growth on the new stock. All sorts of stone fruit, apples, pears, etc. may be inoculated. We inoculate the stock with a foreign bud. 2. To communicate a disease to a person by inserting infectious matter in his skin or flesh; as, to inoculate a person with the matter of small pox or cow pox. When the latter disease is communicated, it is called vaccination.

INOCULATE verb intransitive – To propagate by budding; to practice inoculation. The time to inoculate is when the buds are formed at the extremities of the same year’s shoot, indicating that the spring growth for that season is complete.

–=–

We are talking about the inoculation of parasites here. They are also called viruses (noun/name). As you can see, the word parasite and inoculate are, relatively speaking, one and the same process. Like poisonous mistletoe is budded onto its host tree, so too is a virus budded (connected through receptors) to its host. INOCULATE IS DEFINED AS COMMUNICATING DISEASE, THAT IS, AS CAUSING HARM! But it also defines a biological, obligate parasite.

But we must also consider the biological process of life, specifically the RNA and DNA, and that many attributes of the human condition lay in the viral encoding and informational process. What is passed from mother to son or daughter, including the sex of a child, is done so through the virome.

–=–

RNA, abbreviation of ribonucleic acidcomplex compound of high molecular weight that functions in cellular protein synthesis and replaces DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) as a carrier of genetic codes in some viruses

“The miRNAs are of particular importance. They are about 22 nucleotides long and function in gene regulation in most eukaryotes. They can inhibit (silence) gene expression by binding to target mRNA and inhibiting translation, thereby preventing functional proteins from being produced. Many miRNAs play significant roles in cancer and other diseases. For example, tumour suppressor and oncogenic (cancer-initiating) miRNAs can regulate unique target genes, leading to tumorigenesis and tumour progression.

“Also of functional significance are the piRNAs, which are about 26 to 31 nucleotides long and exist in most animals. They regulate the expression of transposons (jumping genes) by keeping the genes from being transcribed in the germ cells (sperm and eggs). Most piRNA are complementary to different transposons and can specifically target those transposons.”

(Source: Encyclopedia Britanica link – RNA | Definition, Structure, Types, & Functions | Britannica)

–=–

Ah, the germ line… Did you know that your sexual reproduction tools are called the germ line? Don’t believe in germs? LOL!

“A germ line is the sex cells (eggs and sperm) that are used by sexually reproducing organisms to pass on genes from generation to generation. Egg and sperm cells are called germ cells, in contrast to the other cells of the body that are called somatic cells. Germ line actually refers to the sex cells of an organism.(Source–> http://www.genome.gov/genetics-glossary/germ-line)

–=–

Just what do you think a germ is? Let’s stop and consider that question…

How do plants reproduce?

Germination: the coming into existence and growth from Angiosperm or Gymnosperm, the growth of sporelings from spores, such as the spores of fungi, ferns, or bacteria, and the growth of the pollen tube from the pollen grain of a seed plant.

But you don’t believe in “germs,” right?

Or is it that you just don’t understand the terminology and intent behind the word itself? Perhaps it’s that disinformation agents like Andrew Kaufman use incorrect or incomplete data sets and non-technical (common) definitions to misguide and confuse you? In other words, you must stop thinking of germs as mere objects, but instead as objects that have a germinating functionality, or in other words, objects that virally infect (in a good way) other objects in order to create life itself. No germline, no humans.

Another way to consider what a germ is would be to ask the question, how do viruses reproduce? Do they go to singles bars or meet online only to hook up for a sultry one night stand? No, they germ. It’s not just a name, its a functionality, a type of action and orientation. You see, germ theory is not as simple as you thought it was. And in fact, the complex nature of life wholly depends on viruses, bacteria, and other parts of the biome making their sweet sweet form of love through the germination process.

GERMnoun – [Latin germen.] In botany, the ovary or seed-bud of a plant, the rudiment of fruit yet in embryo. It is the base or lower part of the pistil, which, in the progress of vegetation, swells and becomes the seed-vessel. 1. Origin; first principle; that from which any thing springs; as the germ of civil liberty, or of prosperity. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the American Language)

–=–

Still don’t believe in germs? Fortunately for us, our lives don’t depend on nihilistic false-beliefs.

Sexual intercourse is the passing of “germs,” that is sperm, from the male to the female. While the pomp and circumstance of human sexual behavior is certainly different than that of other critters, the purpose behind such behavior and connection is the same – the passing of the germ line.

And then there’s the importance of real, mother to child breastfeeding. We all promote it without consideration of why, but do we really know why it is so important?

Neonatal Virome: Human milk protects against pathogenic viruses:
Author Dr. rer. nat. Markus Brüngel

09.2020

“It is now widely accepted that the bacterial colonisation of an infant’s intestine after birth is a gradual process and that the intestinal microbiome forms quite quickly. In an article published recently in the renowned journal “Nature”, researchers reported that this principle also applies to colonisation by viruses [1]. The type of feeding also has a significant influence on the virome: human milk ensures that fewer pathogenic viruses occur in the baby’s intestine. These findings once again confirm that human milk plays an important role in the protection against infections in early childhood!”

–=–

To put it simply, since bacteria are so easily infected by viruses, the mother’s milk helps prevent such viral infection.

All of this research is late to the game, for the following reasons:

–=–

In the study of microorganisms, bacteria frequently steal the limelight. During an influenza outbreak in late 1800, it was the bacterium Haemophilus influenzae isolated from sputum that was first presumed to cause disease. During the 1918 influenza pandemic, urgent efforts to isolate this causative bacterium failed and it was not until the 1930s that a filterable agent, a virus, Influenza H1N1, was identified as the culprit [1]. Similarly, in the pursuit of understanding human commensal micro organisms, the last 20 years of research has focused almost exclusively on bacteria and their regulation of our immune and nervous systems. In comparison, very little is known about eukaryotic and prokaryotic viruses that also inhabit asymptomatic humans. Given that the name virus was coined from the Latin word meaning slimy liquid or poison and that viruses are considered obligate pathogens, a possibly “beneficial virome ”is surprising to many. The late start for viruses in the commensal micro-organism field is in large part due to our inability to readily culture or detect them, as was the case during the discovery of the influenza virus. We do not yet know the eukaryotic cell or bacterial host of most viruses, and there is no universal 16S ribosomal RNA equivalent, as in bacteria, allowing for rapid taxonomic characterization. Technologies such as metagenomic shave only recently enabled identification of viruses in healthy human tissues. This initially involved sequencing all DNA or RNA in a sample (human, bacterial, and viral), and computationally aligning the massive number of sequences to identify those that resemble known viral genes. An improvement on this approach now involves filtering samples to purge eukaryotic cells and bacteria so that only virus-like particles (VLPs) remain for sequencing. However, since the virome consists of both temperate bacteriophages within bacterial genomes and free VLPs, both total and VLP sequencing will likely provide greater representation of all viruses. Nonetheless, with the approaches taken thus far, studies have revealed viruses are abundant in human feces, blood, skin, lung, oral cavity, and an array of other tissues of healthy and diseased individuals. (Source–> (PDF) Illuminating the human virome in health and disease (researchgate.net))

–=–
Villainizing Viral Vesicles
–=–

In consideration of the “viruses are exosomes” concept (non-theory) put out by Kaufman with absolutely no research or science behind the claim, admittedly stating that it’s just his sole, unscientifically garnered opinion, most who hear his fallacious rhetoric mixed with many non-relative truths have a faith-based belief in his words. And yet, with just a token bit of general research, one can easily debunk this opinion at every angle. Kaufman is believed not because he is a scientist, but because those that allow him to speak and those listening simply do not vet or verify his disinformation. The easily disprovable lie becomes viral, and another disciple of nonsensical Kaufmanism is born, not unlike the effect of any other religious or spiritual guru.

But trust me when I say, if I can do the simple research to find the following, so can you, and one would think, so could Kaufman. But the following journaled science would ruin his whole product and consultation marketing scheme, where he pretends to be a trusted medical doctor instead of a washed out prison psychiatrist.

So let us take a journey into the science of exosomes and their host endosome, so as to understand their purpose, construction, and the ease to which they are infiltrated with viruses.

First, we must know that an exosome is a vesicle excreted from the endoscope of a cell in ones’ own body, which can be highjacked by viruses (viral, contagious matter). 

VESICLE – [ vĕs ′ĭ-kəl ] A small fluid-filled sac in the body. A membrane-bound sac in eukaryotic cells that stores or transports the products of metabolism in the cell and is sometimes the site for the breaking down of metabolic wastes.

–=–

As we’ve seen, the term virus refers to anything infectious, like pus or poison, as “Foul or contagious matter of an ulcer, postule, etc.; poison.” (–Webster’s 1828). But we must also remember, virus is merely the noun (name) form of the adjective VIRULENT. Thus many things, including computer viruses and even ideas, can be called metaphorically as a virus. They are virulent.

VIRULENT adjective – [Latin virulentus, from virus, poison, that is, strength, from the same root as vir, vireoSee Venom.] 1. Extremely active in doing injury; very poisonous or venomous. No poison is more virulent than that of some species of serpents. 2. Very bitter in enmity; malignant; as a virulent invective.

–=–

“Virulence is a pathogen’s or microorganism’s ability to cause damage to a host. In most contexts, especially in animal systems, virulence refers to the degree of damage caused by a microbe to its host. The pathogenicity of an organism—its ability to cause disease—is determined by its virulence factors. In the specific context of gene for gene systems, often in plants, virulence refers to a pathogen’s ability to infect a resistant host.” (Wikipedia)

So when we speak of a virus in terms of disease and not in health or benefit, we speak of that which is virulent. But we should not then confuse the term “virus” as a general name for that which is virulent (harmful), which means it can transfer its biological information to take over and cause cells to release virally infected vesicles (e.g. exosomes) that carry the virus (contagious RNA code) to other cells, etc. The vesicle (exosome) is no more than a carrier, a vehicle for the viral material. And most importantly, the vessel (vesicle) transporting that foreign virus most often does so without “knowing” it has been infected. This is not unlike a mailman delivering bombs or anthrax-laced letters to each mailbox without awareness of his actions or the downline consequences thereof. 

This is important because exosomes are in their normal capacity very much healing agents, which stop inflammation and other symptoms of disease. To call them inceptively as viruses is at best ill-informed (ignorant) and at worse an organized psychological operation to confuse and allow these psychopaths (pseudo-scientists) to continue inventing and spreading viruses to people that now don’t even believe viruses exist. This lie by this already ill-famed PSYCHIATRIST (non-scientist) Dr. Kaufman and others cannot be allowed to continue. 

Below is the description and science behind just what an exosome is and how it functions in normality and after viral infection. All links are active so you can read for yourself the whole study, and the quotes that follow a link are copied therefrom to tell the story of exosomes and their roll.

If you’d like to read the psychiatrist’s opinion ( I refuse to call it a theory anymore), you may do so here:

Link–> https://www.weblyf.com/2020/04/dr-andrew-kaufman-and-the-exosomes-coronavirus-truth/

–=–

And so, as with most disinfo agents, we find lies mixed in with mostly truths. Yes, non-virally infected exosomes are beneficial to health and go around the body to fight inflammation and deliver beneficial (viral) material. This is not news, but rather the very definition of an exosome that anyone can find with a simple internet search. However, the notion that viruses magically appear in exosomes in some feat of spontaneous generation is ludicrous and without any scientific fact. But if you consider his consultation and product sales, the root of this lie it turns out is a well laid plan. Invoking a new age type of mindset in the listener, he pretty much just tells people what they want to hear, that all disease can be cured by the body because the body is the cause of all disease. Therefore, my magical, expensive-as-hell product will cure you from your own emotional detriment. It’s self-help on steroids.

And it would be great, if it were true, if it weren’t a 100% disprovable lie to take advantage of a scared, irrational, already sick population.

–=–

“He (Kaufman) is a grifter. He made a website the second the pandemic broke out and started doing all his interviews with David Icke, and on there he was charging $1000 for a basic 1 time medical consultation.”

–Anonymous commenter

–=–

Now, here’s the truth about exosomes, which are extremely susceptible to viral infection.

Again, to read the whole study, click on the links above the quotations below:

https://www.intechopen.com/books/novel-implications-of-exosomes-in-diagnosis-and-treatment-of-cancer-and-infectious-diseases/exosomes-and-their-role-in-viral-infections

Currently, HCV and hepatitis A virus (HAV) are the only viruses that have been shown to incorporate their full-length genomic RNA within exosomes [31]. Another virus that can utilize the endosomal/exosomal system to deliver viral cargo to uninfected cells is the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1)Viruses are obligate intracellular parasites that hijack cellular pathways to complete their life cycle. In recent years, an accumulating body of data has emerged suggesting that some viruses can also manipulate with the vesicular trafficking machinery for their assembly, egress, and transmission…”

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2018.00090/full

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4378677/

Exosomes are small membrane bound vesicles that carry biological macromolecules from the site of production to target sites either in the microenvironment or at distant sites away from the origin. Exosomal content of cells varies with the cell-type that produces them as well as environmental factors that alter the normal state of the cell such as viral infection. Human DNA and RNA viruses alter the composition of host proteins as well as incorporate their own viral proteins and other cargo into the secreted exosomes.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23441990/

https://stemcellofatlanta.com/difference-between-stem-cells-and-exosomes-lung-repair-and-virus-interruption-discovery-1-3/

https://stm.sciencemag.org/content/12/563/eaaz3426.full

https://www.mdpi.com/journal/viruses/special_issues/viruses_exosomes

Certain viruses deliver their genomes into intraluminal vesicles, which then serve as vehicles to transport the genome along the endocytic pathway to the nuclear periphery for replication. Moreover, endosomal vesicles can be diverted to the exocytic pathway and secreted as exosomes. Exosomes containing viral genomes can promote viral spread by infecting adjacent, or in some cases distant permissive cells, while evading immune recognition, thanks to the absence of viral glycoproteins on the exosome membrane. Conversely, exosomes containing viral proteins or nucleic acids have been found to activate immune responses in myeloid cells in certain cases. Antigen-loaded dendritic cells can activate T cells by directly transferring exosomes to an interacting T cell, although some viruses, like HIV, have evolved to utilize DC to T-cell vesicle transfer as a route for productive infection.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30416610/

“It has been documented that viral hijacking exploits the exosomal pathway and mimics cellular protein trafficking. Exosomes released from virus-infected cells contain a variety of viral and host cellular factors that are able to modify recipient host cell responses. Recent studies have demonstrated that exosomes are crucial components in the pathogenesis of virus infection. Exosomes also allow the host to produce effective immunity against pathogens by activating antiviral mechanisms and transporting antiviral factors between adjacent cells.

https://naturemicrobiologycommunity.nature.com/posts/viral-infection-by-exosome-mimicry-the-havcr1-npc1-pathway

Viral infection by exosome mimicry: the HAVCR1/NPC1 pathway Exosomes play a significant role in cell-to-cell communication. Viruses highjack exosomes hiding in their lumen to avoid immune recognition and enter the cell. However, how exosomes deliver their cargo into the cytoplasm still remains a black box.”

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1567134820302537

“Highlights:

• Extracellular vesicles contribute to intercellular communication.
Virus-infected cells release extracellular vesicles containing viral components that promote infection.
Extracellular vesicles may contribute to spread COVID-19 virus as they transfer such receptors as CD9 and ACE2.
Upon entry, COVID-19 virus may be directed into the exosomal pathway, and its component is packaged into exosomes for secretion.
Extracellular vesicles may serve as a treatment agents for COVID-19 virus.

–=–

In the simplest of terms, Kaufman’s idea that exosomes are self-created viruses and therefore viruses don’t exist would be like blaming the vehicle (vesicle) as the cause of an accident, completely ignoring and excusing the driver (factor) that caused the vehicle (vesicle) to act abhorrently. The vessel is not aware of the drive (virus), so blaming the vesicle without acknowledging its viral infection is ludicrous. Yet this ridiculous notion is key to the false dialectic Kaufman and others are promoting.

I assume the above research is sufficient to completely discredit this psychiatrist’s ignorant claims, again showing how a good liar always includes layers of the truth relative to a false conclusion. And I must admit, he’s a good liar. For even after I heard an interview the first time, it caused me to double-check my own understanding. I’m glad I did, and I hope you are happy to benefit from my verification process as presented here… that is, if you haven’t already socially cancelled me for my shocking non-belief in the non-existence of viruses.

Now let’s move on to Kaufman’s supporting notion that, according to “Koch’s Postulates” published in the year 1890, no virus has been “isolated.”

Here we uncover another, very clever lie through obfuscation of the facts.

Let me just say here that if I ignore the last 130 years of publications and journaled science, I would be agreeable that indeed, viruses don’t fit the criterium that was laid out in Koch’s postulates. And let me say as well that if I ignored the last 130 years of inventions that I would also believe that airplanes, helicopters, and space rockets were also impossible and non-existent. So right away, we find that a statement based on a publication in 1890 doesn’t hold much weight in the year 2021 – unless you simply don’t bother to check for updates over the last century plus 30 years of research and for that matter, historical documentation. Unfortunately, I’m sorry to say, many in the alternative so-called truth movement are just gullible enough to fall, over and over, for these often well-organized, legerdemain disinformation tricks. Some will say, hey Clint, that’s just rude. And to that I will say, no, that’s obviously the Truth. And again, only the Truth, even about yourself, will set you free.

Kaufman is very clever in the way he debates his stance that no virus has been “isolated.” But let me just say from the start here that his argument is based on a specific and purposefully instigated logical fallacy. That fallacy takes root in, you guessed it, the language arts. Words.

Here again I stress the importance of using the correct terms of art for each art or science one is speaking to. If I speak of legal law, I use the legal meaning of words. If I speak of botany, I use the Latin terms of that art to name those flora. If I’m an actual practicing medical doctor, which Kaufman is not, then I would use the accepted medical terms of art. And most importantly, if I’m a virologist, I would use the terms of art that are used in that field of study. Every field has its own terms, and with those terms come their own officious definitions. Even Psychiatry has its own terms of art. And finally, there is the common language, which are the word terms we all use on a constant, conversational level in our dumbed-down society.

So if I wish to cause confusion and deception in my audience, I would certainly use the common definition of the word isolation instead of the term of art that best defines that word for the purpose and intent and practice it was being used to describe. And that’s exactly what Kaufman did. He used the general, common definition of the word isolation to pretend to prove that no virus has ever been isolated. But quite simply, the common word and the scientific term of art do not carry the same exact meaning. Only a con artist would mix terms to fallaciously discredit scientifically achieved research.

Kaufman’s hand-picked definition in his public presentation comes from Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary, which states:

Isolate – “especially: to separate from another substance so as to obtain pure or in a free state.”

Now compare this general meaning to the medical meaning as pertaining to viruses: “Virus isolation is a very specific method for diagnosis of viral infection, but culture techniques need a week or more for completion and require specialized laboratory equipment and skills. Early identification and sampling of affected horses is critical for virus isolation as horses shed viruses for only a short period after infection.”

Kaufman’s trick here is to state not the truth, but a fact that is irrelative to the truth. His extremely disingenuous argument is simply that the “isolation” done on bacteria and other specimens cannot be done to viruses. And, of course, this is a true statement. In fact, it is the very reason his argument is fallacious. For it is certainly well-known in the industries involved and as defined above that virus “isolation” is absolutely dissimilar to other forms of isolation, and should not be confused as being the same method. Virus isolation is a “very specific method,” meaning not the same. And so here we find Kaufman’s false dialectical broken down to its framework. Viral isolation is not the same procedure as other isolation technologies. Simple. Yet Kaufman masterfully uses this non sequitur as if it’s somehow not known. And indeed, unless you take the time to study the process, it’s very easy to be fooled by this false dialectic, that no virus has been isolated. The actual, full, true statement should read: No virus has been isolated according to the general, non-specific meaning and intent of the word.

In attempting to answer this question of virus isolation, I tried to explain it as I could this isolation misnomer to a Kaufman worshiper:

–=–           

Point by point:

1: The study you link is literally based on a limited sample taken from a man in Washington State that had contracted SARS-Cov2 in China. So how can you then say this study shows that SARS-2 is not infectious? There would be no study without the infection in the first place.

2: Using vero cells for SARS-2 is bad science… Vero cells (green monkey kidney cells cloned repeatedly from the 1960’s) have lead to many misleading, scientistic claims, including that hydroxycloroquine and even Prozac helps with human infection:

“Whereas hydroxychloroquine does not appear to stop SARS-CoV-2 from infecting Vero cells, it fails to do the same for human lung cells in a dish. According to research from Stefan Pohlmann, head of the Infection Biology Unit at the German Primate Center in Gottingen, and his collaborators, the devil was in the details of how the cells interact with the SARS-CoV-2’s dreaded ‘spike’ protein. Human lung cells contain at least two different enzymes that can help the virus sneak through their membranes. With Vero cells, however, only one of those modes of entry is available – and it turns out to be the one that hydroxychloroquine will block. Pohlmann and his team published the results in the Journal of Nature on July 22. For him, it’s a clear example of why using human lung cells is really important in studying this pandemic virus. Vero cells should be “handled with caution,” Pohlmann says. “It’s true that the Vero cells are very popular. But unfortunately for this particular aspect of Covid-19 research, they are absolutely not useful. I think this is now clear to the field.”

3: The conclusion completely disagrees with your cherry picked, out of context facts listed here:

“…we examined the capacity of SARS-CoV-2 to infect and replicate in several common primate AND HUMAN cell lines, including human adenocarcinoma cells (A549), human liver cells (HUH7.0), and human embryonic kidney cells (HEK-293T), in addition to Vero E^ and Vero CCL81 cells. We also examined big brown bat kidney cell line (EFK3B) for SARS-CoV-2 replication capacity. Each cell line was inoculated at high multiplicity of infection and examined 24 h (hours) post-infection… NO CPE WAS OBSERVED IN ANY OF THE CELL LINES EXCEPT IN VERO CELLS…”

Ok. What about the human cells? The conclusion continues…

“…In contrast, HUH7.0 and 293T cells SHOWED ONLY MODEST VIRAL REPLICATION, and A549 cells were incompatible with SARS-CoV-2 infection… Together, the results indicate that SARS-2 maintains a similar profile to SARS-1 in terms of susceptible cell lines Replication in HUH7.0 cells also increased quickly after an initial eclipse phase but plateaued by 24 h (hours) post-inoculation in the intracellular compartment at 2 x 10 TCIS 50/ml and decreased after 66 h (hours) post-inoculation. Virus was not detected in the supernatant of infected HUH7 cells until 36 h (hours) post-inoculation and exhibited lower titers at all timepoints… THESE RESULTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH PREVIOUS REPORTS FOR SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, which suggested similar replication dynamics between zoonotic CoV strains…”

You are not looking at the results, you are only looking for select factoids that can be used to prove your belief, which when put into context, have no relevance as stand-alone facts. You ignore the whole study and all those like it just because you found a tiny, out of context fragment to support your belief. In fact, this very limited study was specifically designed to test only (not all) specific cell lines that would grow the virus as a cell substrate, and not one human was re-infected. This does not prove in any way it’s not infectious to humans, only that it did not grow in these particular, extremely small and insignificantly incomplete, very commonly used, specifically cloned cell lines used for research, which are again commonly used as cell substrates to grow all sorts of viruses.

Do you know how many different cells are in the human body? Do you understand that this limited selection of cells used within this study is not in any way uncontrolled, meaning it only covers these specific cell lines and excludes so many others? Do you understand that no human was used as a lab rat?

…To compare your assessment that this single study proves Covid SARS-2 is not infectious to humans due to this one research paper alone tested on 3 or 4 out of many human cell types… that would be like saying all screws are useless and cannot be used because we only tested all those screws with the extremely limited-sized nuts we have in stock. Therefore our conclusion is that most screws have no counterpart nuts, and therefore cannot be used in construction. There are about 30 trillion cells in the human body, as an estimate, with over 200 types categorized, for instance: blood cells (erythrocytes), fat cells, nerve cells (neurons), lung cells, skin cells, and so on… The study also states that,

HAVING ESTABLISHED ROBUST INFECTION WITH SARS-CoV-2 in several cell types, we next evaluated the cross-reactivity of SARS-CoV antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2…”

Did you miss that part, or doesn’t it jive with your belief? The only conclusion this study shows is what most show, which is that more research is needed, and that SARS-2 grows just as well on Vero cells as SARS and MERS does. Nowhere does it conclude what you conclude, that no virus was ever isolated anywhere. The fact that there was viral infection at all, let alone post infectious growth, should be your first sign that the virus exists. The point of the study was certainly not to prove or disprove the virus, nor was this point that viruses might not exist mentioned in the study in any way.

Another example of cells used is this: “Protein Sciences, whose recombinant DNA platform is based on insect cells. Their Sfg cell line comes from the fall armyworm and highly effective as a rapid growth medium. It has been used for several years in producing influenza vaccines. In 2017, Sanofi Pasteur bought Protein Sciences and is using this same platform for their newly developing Covid-19 vaccine which will allow them the flexibility to make millions of doses of vaccine quickly.”

I can assure you that the purpose of the study you are selectively misquoting is to find the growth medium of cells particular to COVID, or in other words, its purpose is to make it grow for vaccine and study purposes, thus they tested the standard cell lines mentioned. There is nothing more to see here. As for your fallacious line about wanting to see full sequencing (isolation), you are barking up a tree that has no say in the matter. If you don’t believe in these sequences, again, I cannot help you.

The end of the report states the following: “Because research has been initiated to study and respond to SARS-CoV-2, information about cell lines and types susceptible to infection is needed. Therefore, we examined the capacity of SARS-CoV-2 to infect and replicate in several common primate and human cell lines, including human adenocarcinoma cells (A549), human liver cells (HUH7.0), and human embryonic kidney cells (HEK-293T), in addition to Vero E6 and Vero CCL81 cells. We also examined an available big brown bat kidney cell line (EFK3B) for SARS-CoV-2 replication capacity. Each cell line was inoculated at high multiplicity of infection and examined 24 h postinfection (Figure 3, panel A). No CPE was observed in any of the cell lines except in Vero cells, which grew to >107 PFU at 24 h postinfection. In contrast, HUH7.0 and 293T cells showed only modest viral replication, and A549 cells were incompatible with SARS-CoV-2 infection. These results are consistent with previous susceptibility findings for SARS-CoV and suggest other common culture systems, including MDCK, HeLa, HEP-2, MRC-5 cells, and embryonated eggs, are unlikely to support SARS-CoV-2 replication (–).”

It’s very important to understand that these cell-lines are all manmade, collected many decades ago, and cloned over and over for research purposes. They are not natural, and are used only for the purposes of growing pathogens. None of these cell-lines are in your body unless they are injected (inoculated).

“In addition, SARS-CoV-2 did not replicate in bat EFK3B cells, which are susceptible to MERS-CoV. Together, the results indicate that SARS-CoV-2 maintains a similar profile to SARS-CoV in terms of susceptible cell lines.

In other words, they are looking for host cell substrates to grow the virus on, and this was a test of those various cell lines commonly used, not to show whether or not infection happens in humans. Finally, the discussion states:

“We have deposited information on the SARS-CoV-2 USA-WA1/2020 viral strain described here into the Biodefense and Emerging Infections Research Resources Repository (website) reagent resources (American Type Culture Collection… and the WORLD REVERENCE CENTER FOR EMERGING VIRUSES AND ARBOVIRUSES, UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH (website), to serve the SARS-CoV-2 reference strain for the United States. The SARS-CoV-2 fourth passage virus has been sequenced and maintains a nucleotide sequence identical to that of the original strain from the United States. These deposits make this virus strain available to the domestic and international public health, academic, and pharmaceutical sectors FOR BASIC RESEARCH!!!”

And now we are back to the point of my Wagging The Dog documentary, which is biological weapons research masqueraded as basic research, where these sequences you doubt the existence of are being cataloged and displayed for anyone to acquire. If you have further questions on these sequences, I suggest you take it up with the proper institutions listed above instead of trolling me and others in youtube comment sections. I assure you it has no effect except to waste my time in response so that the pervasive bullshit spewing from you doesn’t infect others. Now kindly piss off and move on to your next prey. I will not allow any more disrespectful comments from you. Respectful, yes. Douchebaggery, no. Trolling will be deleted.

–=–
Koch Or Pepsi:
The Illusion Of Scientific Choice
–=–

The problem is that now there are who knows how many “fans” of Kaufman’s nonsense that on a constant bases parrot Kaufman’s lies, stating that the coronavirus “isolates” aren’t actually “isolated.” The word game is in full throttle. And so, having no idea what they are talking about, the gullible, unstudied audience spreads Kaufman’s dis-info, making the insistent and completely fallacious, impossible claim that the virus hasn’t been isolated, when in fact the opposite is true. But it’s only true if the correct term of art is used, that is, the correct scientific term and its intended, limited meaning.

Firstly, let me direct you to two papers that explain the whole process of isolation as it pertains to the coronavirus, so that you get the actual methodology and story from someone that actually works with and isolates these viruses. That seems like a reasonable thing to do. You might want to choose to read these articles after finishing mine own, so you know before reading them what the term isolation actually means in viral research, instead of having a false belief grafted into your psyche by this psychiatrist that in fact has never worked a single day in his life with viruses or their isolation:

I study viruses: How our team isolated the new coronavirus to fight the global pandemic
Link–> I study viruses: How our team isolated the new coronavirus to fight the global pandemic (theconversation.com)

Sigh, yes, the ‘COVID virus’ is real”
Link–> Sigh, yes, the ‘COVID virus’ is real – Virology Down Under

Here’s an important excerpt from that second article to get us in the mood to speak about both isolation and the non-relevancy of Koch’s postulates to viruses:

———————————————————————————————————-

Koch’s postulates – derived from his work on bacteria – were formally proposed at a lecture by Koch in 1890.

From Causation and Disease: The Henle-Kock Postulates Revisited, by ALfred Evens. [5] Remember – these were made before anything was really known about what a virus truly was. They were designed with bacteria in mind, and as a guide not a dictum.

–=–

For context, that’s before we had ever visualized a human or plant virus, before organ or cell culture of viruses, before sequencing of viral genes or genomes and before we had labelled antibodies we could as probing tools to show viral proteins in tissues. It was known that this toxic stuff (virus, from Latin, translates to ‘slimy liquid, poison’) was smaller than bacteria because it passed through filters that stopped them, and yet could still cause disease. Discovery of human viruses came later still (Yellow fever virus, 1901-1921).

Koch’s postulates were never intended to be rigidly applied, even then. In fact, trying to strictly adhere to them probably delayed the discovery of viruses.[11]

So let’s move away from the 1890s… this revision by Fredericks and Relman (from Fenner and White’s Medical Virology (Fifth Edition) is much more relevant to recent decades.

–=–

SARS-CoV-2 replicates in human pancreatic islets

To determine the susceptibility to ex vivo infection, human pancreatic islets isolated from four human donors were exposed to SARS-CoV-2, and expression of viral spike (S) and nucleocapsid (N) protein, as well as endocrine cell markers, was analysed. S and N proteins were not detected at day 1 (not shown), but became readily detectable at days 3 (Fig. 2a) and 5 (Fig. 2b) post-infection (Extended Data Fig. 5). Pancreatic islets treated with 5 µM remdesivir, a polymerase inhibitor with potent in vitro anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity52, did not stain positive for S or N proteins, indicating suppression of SARS-CoV-2 replication. Quantification of viral N-protein expression in infected islets confirmed robust infection ranging between 20% N-positive cells at day 3 and 34% at day 5 per infected islet (Fig. 2c).

(Link–> SARS-CoV-2 infects and replicates in cells of the human endocrine and exocrine pancreas | Nature Metabolism)

–=–

From several other lectures and info on viral isolation and purification techniques, I paraphrase:

Isolation of viruses requires a totally different system than isolation of bacteria. Viruses don’t have any similarity to bacteria or the eukaryotic system… It’s a totally different approach to cultivate it (virus).

Eukaryoticof, relating to, or being an organism (as of the domain Eukarya) composed of one or more cells containing visibly evident nuclei and organellesbeing or characteristic of a eukaryote. The first known use of this term was not until 1957, almost 70 years after the original Koch’s postulates were published. In other words, those postulates don’t necessarily apply to viruses, which are not of the domain we find bacteria in. Comparatively, Koch’s postulates, when compared to modern viral research, are like instructions on how to build a square wheel.

Cells fall into one of two broad categories: prokaryotic and eukaryotic. The single-celled organisms of the domains Bacteria and Archaea are classified as prokaryotes (pro = beforekaryon– = nucleus). Animal cells, plant cells, fungi, and protists are eukaryotes (eu = true).

–=–

This is very important, for the false non-scientific theory of Kaufman is that viruses are somehow created inside the body, out of thin air. Yet viruses do not exist as such in the animal or Eukaryote kingdom. This would metaphorically be like theorizing that a tiger can spontaneously (without viral spread and infection of the coded information) grow fish scales. This doesn’t happen in Nature, for each of these lifeforms has its own kingdom, its own domain, and generally each species has its own viruses that do not spread to other species (with some exceptions). SARS-Cov1 required an animal intermediary, whereas SARS-Cov2 is artificially mutated (gain of function) to bypass this requirement and be infectious by human to human contact. This function was added in the laboratory, as my documentaries show.

Prokaryotes are further divided into two main kinds of organisms: bacteria and archaea. Some examples of prokaryotic organisms include the common bacteria E. coli, the archaea M. Smithii which helps humans break down polysaccharides in the intestines, and Deinococcus radiodurans, a species of bacteria known for its extreme radiation resistance… Prokaryotic organisms are so named because they consist of prokaryotic cells. There are two fundamental kinds of cells, prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. Eukaryotic cells contain a membrane-bound nucleus of DNA and several well-defined independent cellular organelles. Eukaryotic cells are the basic building blocks of all complex multicellular life, including human beings. (Link–> Prokaryotes Examples To Learn From | Science Trends)

For clarity, humans are in the kingdom Animalia, which is in the domain Eukarya. All organisms therein are considered eukaryotic. Viruses are neither prokaryotic nor eukaryotic. Viruses are in a separate category known as obligate intracellular parasites. By themselves, viruses do not carry the biological material necessary to reproduce; they can only replicate themselves by infecting prokaryotic or eukaryotic cells. (Source–> Is a Virus a Prokaryote or a Eukaryote? (reference.com))

In other words, there is no total isolation of a virus from its host. The whole purpose of a virus, as RNA (biological information), is to be inoculated (infected) into a host so that the full host/virus result comes to fruition. The host becomes the virus. There is nothing to isolate, except what is the term of art that describes the isolation process for viruses, which is again completely different than Koch’s postulates allow for. Kaufman certainly knows this to be true, but conveniently obfuscates this knowledge to support his lie– err, theory.

And the parrots repeat over and over the wrong information to each other, forming a cult-like belief system based on absolutely nothing but the trust in this completely inexperienced psychiatrist that uses no scientifically-achieved data sets to verify his opinions.

Most importantly here, we can see that Koch’s postulates are strictly speaking designed only for application toward Prokaryotic infections in the domain of Eukaryotic species. Why would anyone suggest therefore that Koch’s postulates should likewise apply to a viral (parasitic) infection of that which is not of the Prokaryotic domain? Why indeed… The answer should be becoming painfully obvious. The postulates were, as we’ve noted, altered in the 1930’s to include viruses that are not of either the Animalia or Bacteria kingdoms. This alone creates a huge, cavernous hole in Kaufman’s “theory,” and misaligns most of his supporting non-primary data. Imagine if I required a banana and all other species of fruit to meet the requirements of an apple to therefore be part of the fruit domain? They are a completely different species. There’s no room in my domain for you, banana. You’re to soft and squishy and you bruise like my great grandma. We apples are a class all our own! According to Kosher Dill postulates, you therefore don’t exist! Bananas are obviously the product of and exosomal release caused by stress on the environment, not real fruit…

But in this case, comparing postulates designed so intentionally for bacterial infection to what is a completely different viral infection is like comparing the mechanism of action of a cruise ship to a canoe. Kaufman and his ilk simply chose to ignore the updates to these 130 year old postulates, ignoring all the science behind them since, cherry-picking only that which supports the “alternative” argument, which in the end, appears to be based on nothing at all but obfuscation of already proven scientific fact. In other words, Kaufman has created a very well-laid false dialectic designed to “cancel” the scientific understanding of viruses and germs. And because Kaufman’s unscientific “theory” is considered as nothing but preposterous in the scientific realm, he chose an audience that is not of the “science community,” not familiar with scientific terms, and that is therefore open to a good false conspiracy.

Hint: he’s not presenting research or papers to any journals, as all other researchers would strive to do. No. Instead, Kaufman came into the alternative movement at day 1 of the Covid-19 debacle, because we are an audience that would actually consider his lies as legitimate without proof. And it certainly wouldn’t be the first time!

From another lecture: “Viruses, as obligate parasites, must be grown in living cells. This is the biggest challenge of all. All the other organisms (e.g. bacterium) generally grow by taking up provided nutrients, most often chemicals. Viruses will also grow taking up nutrients, but if we give them chemical nutrients they will not grow in and of themselves. Again, viruses are by their nature obligate parasites. We need to supply them with a host, which means some form of living cell. So we need to maintain a living cell in the lab in order to maintain a virus in the lab. The virus is, in other words, BECOMES PART OF THE HOST…

“Bacteriophages are placed upon a lawn of bacteria and form plaques (the plate or dish is prepared, the bacteria is added, and then the bacteriophages are added, entering into the bacteria and thriving within). Inversely, animal viruses may be grown in cell cultures, embryonated eggs, or in living animals (as examples), all of which act as hosts. This is why virus handling becomes much more critical than the handling of bacteria. In fact, they cannot be compared. They are completely different systems of research.

When searching for viral infection, it’s not the virus as a whole that is sought out, but certain proteins that otherwise would not be present in the host that originate from the virus. Thus tests (like Western Blot) are used to detect and identify specific antibodies, which shows evidence of the parasitic viral infection. More importantly, specific proteins that are associated only with the specific capsid or envelope of a virus, when discovered, are what show proof of the presence of the virus, BECAUSE THOSE PROTEINS ARE NOT OTHERWISE FOUND IN THE HOST, or in other words, never originate from eukaryotic (e.g., human) cells but is exactly what is expected to originate from the viral capsid or envelope of the virus.

Link–> (12) Virology lecture 1 | Virus structure and classification – YouTube

In short, there is no debate here. Comparing bacterial research with virus research is a completely different functionality and a totally different criteria. And here we find the greatest chink in Kaufman’s rotting amour, that the proteins of a virus envelope do not exist in human (eukaryotic) cells. This completely destroys the idea that exosomes are somehow self-created viruses or that viruses don’t exist, for the presence of the virus is proven by those otherwise impossibly present viral proteins in the human body. Ouch! That’s got to hurt!

Now, we could stop here, leaving an unwarranted shred of legitimacy to Kaufman’s false dialectical. But, for the sake of further proofs and clarification, so there’s no doubt left over, let’s take a look at the history of Koch’s postulates to make sure this is a correct statement:

–=–

“Koch’s postulates (/ˈkɔːx/) are four criteria designed to establish a causative relationship between a microbe and a disease. The postulates were formulated by Robert Koch and Friedrich Loeffler in 1884, based on earlier concepts described by Jakob Henle, and refined and published by Koch in 1890. Koch applied the postulates to describe the etiology of cholera and tuberculosis (bacteria), but they have been controversially generalized to other diseases. These postulates were generated before modern concepts in microbial pathogenesis that cannot be examined using Koch’s postulates, including viruses (which are obligate cellular parasites) and asymptomatic carriers. They have largely been supplanted by other criteria such as the Bradford Hill criteria for infectious disease causality in modern public health.” (–Wikipedia)

–=–

Well now… it appears that emperor Kaufman suddenly has no clothes.

It is at least incredibly disingenuous and at worst purposefully misleading to demand that Koch’s postulates be applied to virus research, for what now should be obvious reasons. Firstly, the first virus to be seen with the human eye did not occur until the microscope was invented and later improved to show microscopic viruses well after these postulates were published. Trust me when I say, Mr. Koch was long dead by then. Thus Kaufman’s claim that viral research into SARS-Cov-2 does not meet with Koch’s postulate is cleverly both true and false. True because those postulates simply don’t apply to viral research, and false because of the same reason. In other words, this whole argument, parroted and promoted by many fools that have not done any decent research into the subject, is a giant red herring – a well-rehearsed logical fallacy. It’s very clever, I’ll grant that much. But to put it into perspective, this would be like saying that the way NFL players play football does not meet the PGA’s rules of golf etiquette and dress code. They are two different methodologies for two very different games. To be clear: the rules of isolation of bacteria cannot be applied to the same game of isolating viruses.

–=–
Viral Lives Matter
:
Isolation is Not Segregation
–=–

And that brings us full circle to this term of the medical and scientific arts, the word isolation. Again, there are certain, numeral instances in professional settings where the common dictionary term of words simply does not apply. In fact, some professional terms of art do not even exist in common speech. Yet Dr. Kaufman provides us with a whole argument against the existence of SARS-Cov-2 based on the common Oxford dictionary definition of the word isolation. His argument starts with this singular definition with complete disregard to any actual scientific terminology.

Therefore, Kaufman falsely and quite smugly appears to be correct. Again, this is a very clever slight of hand deceit, a legerdemain trickery.

Amazingly, Kaufman somehow attempts to twist the truth in his presentation into his own logical fallacy. This is to say that he quotes from the later modified postulates that actually allow for the existence of viruses, where he quotes Rivers from his 1937 update to Koch’s then almost 50 year old document (as Kaufman writes in the second and third quotes below):

“According to Koch’s postulates, as modified by Rivers for viral diseases, six criteria are required to establish a virus as the cause of a disease.”

“…now it is possible to bring excellent evidence that an organism is the cause of a malady without the complete satisfaction of the [Koch’s] postulates.”

“…particularly those [diseases] caused by viruses, the blind adherence to Koch’s postulates may act as a hindrance instead of an aid.

So here we have just that phenomenon – the so-called Dr. Kaufman has taken a strict stance in blind adherence to the original, non-applicable, bacterial postulates, convincing many others unread on the subject to do the same, which has certainly acted as a hindrance to learning about viruses. Doesn’t this sound a bit like religion, ignoring the new testament to promote the old or vice-versa, like faith-based ignorance of all that is not part of the particularly designed denominated faith (dialectic)? You must ask yourself whether the fool is he that adheres to such a theory as Koch’s postulates despite their invention before the age of technology to detect viruses, or he that challenges that theory of postulates after 50 years of technological improvement and knowledge. For here we are, now 85 years later than River’s contribution and improvement to that theory, and what do we find? Nothing more than a cult of misguided, uneducated beliefs in an incomplete, unusable theory, comparing apples and oranges as if they are the same thing.

In short, Koch’s postulates are not required to be met for viruses or viral infection, only for bacteriological ones. And this is a well-known fact in that institution of science, which explains Kaufman’s turning away from that institution to prey on we the non-science community. The argument is mute, and has been for almost a century. New evidence must alter old theories, or science is a dead art. There is no belief or consensus in properly executed science research. And Dr. Kaufman is anything but a scientist.

Finally, without being accused of character assassination, let us take a closer look at the good Doctor’s history in a clearer light. And for knowledge sake, let’s use the public record without inserting our own opinion. Understand this is not a character assassination, because that is not needed here. We need not attack the messenger when the message is so provably shown to be a pile of stinky smelly dung. But for those that hold to any supposed legitimacy of flattering title or syndicalist university credentials, we must understand the following as the final nail in Kaufman’s proverbial coffin.

Dr. Andrew R Kaufman has the following 2 specialties

NEUROLOGY

PSYCHIATRY

Dr. Andrew R Kaufman has the following 13 expertise

  • Depression
  • Depressive Disorder
  • Manic Depressive Disorder
  • Schizophrenia
  • Clinical Depression
  • Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
  • Bipolar Disorder
  • Mood Disorders
  • Mental Illness
  • Insomnia
  • Personality Disorder
  • Sleep Disorders
  • Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD) / Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)

So he’s a licensed drug pusher. He pretends to treat pretended “mental” disease. No specialties or experience in virology or microbiology. He’s a psychiatrist, which for some insane reason carries the title of Medical Doctor. Actually I know the reason. It’s so these fake “doctors” can have the highest power granted by government, that of drug prescription, the very backbone of their industry. After all, it’s psychiatry that invents new disease on behalf of universities and drug companies in new drug “discovery.” For the Psychiatry industry writes the handbook of drugs every year, entitled the DSM-5.

Who publishes it? Why none other than the private non-governmental organization called the American Psychiatric Association. Read about that handbook here at their website: DSM-5 (psychiatry.org) “The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM–5) is the product of more than 10 years of effort by hundreds of international experts in all aspects of mental health. Their dedication and hard work have yielded an authoritative volume that defines and classifies mental disorders in order to improve diagnoses, treatment, and research.”

To be clear, my contempt for this industry of death and legalized torture and restraint, was documented in the two films below:

This multi-part documentary says it all. See the full version here: Psychiatry: An Industry of Death (cchr.org) (HIGHLY RECOMENDED)

Also watch The Hidden Enemy: The Hidden Enemy: Inside Psychiatry’s Covert Agenda (cchr.org) (HIGHLY RECOMENDED)

–=–

But let us not judge each individual merely by this sick and twisted history of psychiatric hell. Let’s instead read what his own peers say about Kaufman’s journey into Neverland:

–=–

“The Psychiatrist Who Calmly Denies Reality”

McGill University Office for Science and Society “Separating Sense from Nonsense”

24 Sep 2020 COVID-19 Pseudoscience

“Dr. Andrew Kaufman made the rounds in the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic by claiming the virus did not exist. Now, he leads anti-maskers in public demonstrations and tells hundreds of thousands of YouTube users that everything they know about medicine is wrong.

It is alarming to find a popular medical doctor on the Internet who claims that appendicitis—a common inflammation of the appendix which can lead to sepsis and death—is no big deal. According to him, it’s simply constipation, which can be relieved by enema. He says it so calmly, though, that you may be inclined to believe him.

This doctor is Andrew Kaufman, based in Syracuse, New York. In the middle of a global health pandemic, he has become a prominent voice in the COVID denialism movement online. Many of his lengthy commentaries on YouTube have received hundreds of thousands of views. If you have heard that the coronavirus is not real, that scientists are actually detecting “exosomes,” you are familiar with Kaufman’s theory. His turn away from medicine seems to have been triggered in part by reading the book A Mind of Your Own by Kelly Brogan, a psychiatrist turned virus denier and Goop contributor. Kaufman regularly takes to YouTube to answer specific medical questions from viewers and provides them with “information” that runs counter to basic knowledge of the human body, endorsing bone broths and detox protocols for a variety of ailments. He is not a naturopath; he is a psychiatrist with an active medical license in his state.

Illuminating fringe claims can poison the public discourse, but Kaufman is popular enough that addressing his main theory is necessary. And his even-tempered warnings about a “globalist agenda” and a “manufactured crisis” that has led to “coercion” feed the playbook of COVID-19 conspiracy theorists.

The myth that the virus isn’t there

Sounding composed and knowledgeable, Kaufman repeatedly tells his viewers that viruses are not a cause of human diseases. Through watching hours and hours of video, I have seen him deny the existence of the viruses behind the common cold, polio, HIV-AIDS, viral hepatitis, chickenpox, COVID-19, and measles. One of his favourite examples for why his war against germ theory is justified is the case of Stefan Lanka, which he sells to his audience as “the Supreme Court of Germany actually ruled that there is no measles virus that’s been proved to exist” (from his interview with London Real, time code 1:04:00). The truth is that Lanka issued a challenge: he wanted a single scientific paper that, on its own, proved beyond the shadow of a doubt that the virus existed. When a doctor named David Bardens produced six papers that together met the burden of proof, Lanka refused to pay and the Court recognized that Lanka was free to set the rules as he saw fit because this was an award and he could give it to whomever. The measles virus is very real: Lanka’s public challenge was, in my opinion, a no-win scenario to give credence to his virus denialism.

Dr. Andrew Kaufman rose to fame in the early days of the pandemic by claiming that what scientists were actually seeing with their electron microscopes was not a new coronavirus but rather exosomes. This story is quite interesting as it reveals a common tactic Kaufman uses. In building a bridge between an observation and a conclusion he likes, he will often use valid science to lay down a number of planks. When that bridge is almost complete, he runs out of planks and takes a leap of faith, but that leap may only be noticeable by an expert. Going back to exosomes, most of what Kaufman says is true. Our body is made of cells, and you can imagine a cell like a soap bubble. An exosome is a tiny bubble that buds off from that soap bubble and starts floating around, maybe eventually fusing with another soap bubble.

These exosomes can carry payloads, like genetic material, and act as transporters inside our body, and they do look an awful lot like many viruses. In fact, sometimes a virus will infect a cell and an exosome containing the virus’ genetic material will bud off and go on to infect another cell, just like a viral particle would! But here we reach the end of our bridge. Two scientific experts discussed this issue in a YouTube video and concluded that “clearly, there are similarities between exosomes and the coronavirus but they are absolutely different in many aspects.” Kaufman takes a leap and claims the virus does not exist. It’s all exosomes.

In fact, Kaufman loves to mention that doctors who claim to have found an infectious virus have never been able to fulfill Koch’s hallowed postulates. A brief history lesson is warranted. Microbiologist Robert Koch stated during the Victorian era (just before we even really knew what DNA and viruses were) that to prove that a microbe caused disease, you needed to isolate it from living things with the disease and not find it in living things without the disease. And if you took it from a living thing that had it and gave it to a living thing that did not, it should produce disease and you should be able to then isolate this microbe within it. So if scientists have not done this with a particular virus, it gives license to people like Kaufman to claim that we just don’t know.

The problem is that Koch himself realized that requiring his postulates to be fulfilled each and every time was mistaken. He noticed people who were carriers of typhoid fever and of cholera who did not have symptoms. They had the infectious agent but not the disease. Was it proof these microbes did not after all cause the disease? No. Koch’s postulates are historically interesting, but they have essentially been supplanted by guidelines based on the detection of DNA or RNA from the microbe itself.

For those who want to delve deeper into “Where Kaufman thinks the coronavirus’ genetic code comes from“, click here

From MD to ND

Dr. Andrew Kaufman is, in my opinion, a naturopath now. He charges USD 750 for a natural health consultation (and $1,750 for the premium package). He has stated that technological advances in medicine are only superior to natural methods “if your bone is sticking out of your skin”; that it’s wrong to be synthesizing drugs; and that we should simply rely on natural molecules whose safety, he claims, is known. And like naturopaths, Kaufman sees toxins everywhere. He thinks we get them from clothes, shampoo and the food supply. Urinary tract infections, he believes, can be caused by toxins in the rectum that “translocate” to the urinary system. So naturally, he recommends “cleansings” to many people writing in with questions. These mysterious toxins and our rituals to purify ourselves from them remind me of the demons and exorcisms of old, and if you think that’s a stretch, Kaufman, a psychiatrist who has done work in the criminal justice system in the past, thinks “demon possession may actually be a factor in some mental illness” like schizophrenia. Many of the comments on his live streams display a strong religious fervour—“Yes demons are for real” and “Just walk with Christ and you are save [sic] even if they kill you!”—so much so that you would think you were watching the world’s most unflappable preacher.

But Kaufman is not content to embrace naturopathy and deny the existence of germs: he has to imply that this pandemic just doesn’t add up. He has called lockdowns a form of “house arrest” and “martial law”, taking away people’s right to assemble and right to religion. He has claimed (erroneously) that vaccines are “syringes full of poison” and that masks simultaneously have pores too big to block the “virus” (whatever that means for him) but small enough to significantly reduce your oxygen supply, which makes no scientific sense. He rhetorically asks the question, “Who wears masks?”, but does not answer it with “doctors, dentists, nurses.” “People who are hiding something,” he says, “people who are being dishonest, people who are thieves.” He lost his remaining part-time doctor job recently for refusing to wear a mask and has since been leading a group of unmasked people into local businesses to make a stand.

He worries this “manufactured crisis” has a goal, which is to make people reliant on government handouts, a common conspiracist belief of the “freedom” reactionaries. To put icing on this martyrdom cake, he has tied Bill Gates to the eugenics movement and was featured on London Real, a video channel making millions of dollars promoting self-help and conspiracy theories, thanks to former guest David Icke, who believes reptilian alien-human hybrids secretly run the world. Kaufman thought this interview was such a treat, he wore a suit and tie for it.

COVID denialism, belief in detox regimens, libertarian calls to protect individual freedoms, all of these tropes are being stitched together into a Frankenstein’s monster by unscientific people like Dr. Andrew Kaufman. Where might it end? Sounding calm, collected, and ominous, Kaufman promises that “if we get to [the point where soldiers are holding you down to vaccinate you], I promise that I will give out a ‘recipe’ that can mitigate things for people that are held down by force and vaccinated.”

This Andy Kaufman is no joke.

Take-home message:


– Dr. Andrew Kaufman, a psychiatrist essentially turned naturopath, has become very popular on YouTube for denying the existence of the coronavirus.
– He claims the coronavirus is instead an exosome, a natural transport vehicle made by our cells, and while exosomes do have some similarities to viruses, there is undeniable evidence that the coronavirus exists.
– Dr. Kaufman is part of a conspiracy movement that believes the pandemic is being manufactured to take away people’s rights, and his calm and confident demeanor can appear very convincing even when he makes outrageous claims like that appendicitis is simply constipation.”

–=–

Now, you may be reading this and saying to yourself, well gee, much of what Dr. Andy says turns out to be true! And that’s the point. This is a time-tested recipe for the successful false dialectic, 70-90% truth mixed with 10-30% lies, depending on the scope of the psychological operation and the state of common knowledge in the people one must fool. And while this article is written in a way to disparage even myself, using fallacious and reprehensible terms like conspiracy theorist to excuse the author’s own non-research and ignorance into anything not accepted by the syndicalist medical and university industry, the relative points made about Kaufman are certainly fair. And, as hard as it is to admit, this ostracized “doctor” has ironically been cancelled from the medical industry, which is the very reason which he now preys on the alternative movement, knowing we are not professionals and mostly not educated in these topics. This false dialectic simply will not work on educated people that research and verify before they allow themselves to believe. So this is as much a lesson about ourselves as it is about those that prey on our collective ignorance. We are good people that want to believe in good things, and that makes us vulnerable to bad people selling the appearance and façade of good by wolves in sheep’s clothing.

–=–
The Terrain And The Germ:
Two Great Tastes That Taste Great Together
–=–

In doing a general search for the terms terrain theory vs. germ theory, the top of the search engine’s response came up to read “germ theory denialism.”

While this article today is not about terrain theory or my personal opinion on it, I will simply state here that these two “theories” need not be considered in any way antagonistic or as polar opposite to one another – unless your goal is to create cognitive dissonance in a false dialectical. In other words, as we’ve discussed above about what the germ line is and what the nature of all germs (i.e. germination) is, there is nothing anywhere that says that a healthy immune system and a generally healthy and well-nourished body is somehow not a contributor to a state of good health. To put it another way, nobody that speaks about germs in a professional, scientific way would in the same sentence refer to the terrain (body) as irrelevant to the purpose and intent of a germ. In other words, it should be obvious that at their core, these theories are both correct, and provably so, and therefore not opposed to each other. In fact, they are two different subjects that really have no business being placed in opposition to each other unless the ability of the germ to be viral is questioned in a healthy or unhealthy environment. No germ expert would promote the notion that a diseased body (terrain) would effect the ability of the germ to fulfill its parasitic goal. Again, it’s a non sequitur.

It’s ok, folks, you can believe in both theories, because both theories have merit. But profiteers like Kaufman, including both sides of the isle of pharmaceutical drug (chemicals) and “natural” supplement product sellers, make their profits from the artificial controversy they promote, not from the actual effect of their products. Those that believe in one theory believe the practitioners that support and supplement or treat for that theory, and vice-versa. It’s time to declare peace, to return to actual science in method, and to call bullshit on most of the “mainstream” and “alternative” crap being peddled out there. For it is the controversy itself that keeps the disinformation agents and profiteers in business and in the news. Remember, the cancelation of one thing requires the preservation of it to promote it’s opposite. No source, no opposition. You may research both theories yourself, of course, for this post has gone on long enough. Just remember that like Mr. Koch and Mr. Pasteur did over 100 years ago, we must always keep neutrality and scientific observation at the top of and binding over our ill-formed opinions and theories, remembering that all theories are temporary and meant to be improved upon or outright disproven. That’s the backbone of legitimacy in any art or science venture.

As for this Psych Doctor turned conman-naturopath, I can only request that anyone that has interviewed or supported this quack and his absolutely disprovable theories must immediately, officially retract their support and correct the record with their listenership. Do not be afraid to have a clear conscious. Do not pretend that truth has two sides and that everyone deserves to be heard. Do not do what the mainstream does in its constant controlled opposition and competing stories, then disclaiming to be fair and balanced and that the audience is smart enough to decide what is true. That’s completely evil, irresponsible, and just bad journalism. That is a lack of integrity and outright laziness. If not, then stop calling yourself and your show as part of the “truth” movement and start calling it what it really is – ENTERTAINMENT. For this is the worst kind of lie, the worse kind of lack of self-responsibility and self-government, making you part of the problem, not the solution.

One final note on Kaufman…

As I have the good fortune to speak privately with many prominent hosts and authors in the alternative sphere, those that I consider legitimate have one thing in common, and that is that we’ve all been “handled” by some of the same people. I will keep these names private on both ends for the purposes of this post, but it is important to know that DR. Kaufman was seemingly invented overnight at the same time Judy Mikovits arrived on the scene (see Plandemic movie and the 100’s of hit pieces all over the mainstream news about her.) Yet there is virtually nothing about this provocateur’s psychiatrist in comparison. Also, there are a few of us that indeed have retracted any support of this quack, as well as full retractions of his supposed, unverifiable credentials. As an example of this provocateurs’ actions and intention, we see in this interview that Kaufman was literally kicked off the show for attempting to character assassinate Dr. Judy Mikovits (an actual PhD virologist), even going so far as to deny the importance of her credentials, while apparently falsely claiming his own. Watch as the agent provocateur’ first sets up the scene that viruses don’t exist knowing that a virologist is coming on, then saying “does anyone know what she’s saying” while goading on the lack of most audience and panel members ability to understand the terms of science Dr. Mikovits uses. Then watch as she attempts to explain how it all works with the actual meaning of specific “Virus isolation,” even agreeing with Kaufman in his very layman assessment, and then watch as he attacks his target with unfortunate, fallacious, and downright asinine failure. Note that he uses the common definition of “isolation” instead of the scientific definition, which she tries to explain the difference between, that a parasite and its host are the virus. Listen also to the host that falls for the logical fallacy Kaufman is proposing, believing the virus is not “isolated” according to the common meaning, which is TRUE. He doesn’t know the difference between the scientific terms of art cause and causative. Then Kaufman is kicked off the show for his extremely unprofessional behavior, so that a real doctor (PhD) with actual experience in gain of function research can explain what’s actually happening with the Covid vaccine.

Link–> Special Event Roundtable with Dr. Andrew Kaufman vs. Dr. Judy Mikovits (bitchute.com)

Finally, there’s this comment:

Mark McClain – Who is Dr. Andrew Kaufman, the supposed accredited MIT scientist behind COVID-19 denialist theories? Are his arguments valid?

I have spent some time trying to figure out who Dr. Andrew Kaufman is. According to London Real tv, who have posted Kaufman’s one YouTube video, say he studied at Duke, MIT and Medical University of South Carolina. Matching those qualifications to Dr. Andrew Kaufman and a forensic psychiatrist from New York is the result. I also found a disciplinary action from the state of Ohio in 2012 for Dr. Andrew Kaufman who studied at University of South Carolina and Duke. Here is the action of the Ohio Disciplinary Board: Andrew Russell Kaufman, M.D. Dr. Kaufman participated in a research project that offered participants a $25 gift code to Online Shopping for Electronics, Apparel, Computers, Books, DVDs & more as an incentive. After the study concluded Dr. Kaufman used nearly all the remaining gift codes, which had been purchased with unrestricted grant money from a pharmaceutical company, to purchase personal items. Dr. Kaufman later took steps to cancel the order and return the merchandise. However, as a result of his actions, Dr. Kaufman was suspended from the residency program and notified that his status would be listed as nonprogram completion, which caused his resident training license to become inactive. Duke University and Dr. Kaufman have since executed an agreement providing for a six-month remediation program beginning on January 1, 2009 that will enable Dr. Kaufman to complete his residency program.

Before the North Carolina Medical Board In re: Andrew Russell Kaufman, M.D. Consent Order. 2008-11-26: http://www.circare.org/pd/kaufman_20081126.pdf

I have no idea what expertise this guy would possibly have about the coronavirus. His specialty is psychiatry of the criminal mind. His one video is repeated by conspiracy theorists, but I could not find anything of relevant research. He has a YouTube video. Conspiracy theorists like it. Not the type of source I would deem reliable.

Coupon fraud case link here: Andrew Russell Kaufman, M.D. Before the North Carolina Medical Board In re: Andrew Russell Kaufman, M.D. Consent Order. 2008-11-26 (circare.org)

–=–
To Kill The Mockingbirds
–=–

In conclusion, I don’t really have much to say. I have provided you with what I feel is sufficient evidence and research to clear up this false debate. I must remind people that he who speaks some truth should not be given the benefit of the doubt that all his speech is as well the truth. This nonsensical shrink must not be allowed to taint the minds of the few of us that can still think for ourselves, for we are being bombarded with disinfo and false dialectics from every angle.

I hope this has helped in your own understanding and dissemination of all this research and to help you to see the enemies among us, acting as if they are one of us to take advantage of and mislead us.

Finally, I’m happy to say that my next documentary, part 2 of Wagging the Dog, the Story Behind the Story of Covid-19, will be coming out soon. It will consist almost entirely of more panel discussions behind the closed doors of the NIH speaking about all the viruses they have mutated through gain of function in the lab and allowed to escape. Thus, one of the reasons I have written this article today is that I cannot very well present such primary evidence as the very scientists that mutate viruses while funded by the NIH if my audience have any doubt that viruses even exist, my greatest reason for feeling the need to present this research to you today.

Be well, and seek only the Truth.

.

–Clint > richard-son (Realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Wednesday, April 14th, 2021

Media Finally Reports On Covid-19 As Biological Weapon, Sort Of


This is the first time we find anything even remotely close in the mainstream news to what my documentary, Wagging The Dog, exposes and clearly points to.

Here’s the link, and definitely worth the watch:

Link–> https://video.foxnews.com/v/6225847837001#sp=show-clips

But please, don’t get your hopes up. Let’s examine this a bit closer so that you don’t mistake this controlled opposition op-ed for actual good news reporting…

First of all, as I’ve been saying for 7 years, Fox News has now positioned itself officially as the controlled opposition of the mainstream media. In other words, as John Stadtmiller pointed out to me years ago, the Fox network has become the poser of alternative news, meaning the network has attempted to replace the independent sphere with its own artificial brand of alternative news reporting. In fact, over the last year or two, Fox hosts (not reporters, but talk show hosts) have been referring to the rest of the conglomerate corporations as the “mainstream” and to Fox News as their sole opposition.

Basically, Fox News is pretending to be the alternative media. This transition and shift in propaganda and marketing started many years ago, with the advent of “Patriot Radio” talk station on satellite television. They have even taken over the alternative advertising plan, promoting gold and silver and storable food, along with other survival and similar, obscure products and services.

Now, the legerdemain trickery has reached new heights of idiocy, as they pretend to be threatened with cencorship and general hatred by what they now refer to as the “mainstream media,” as if Fox News is not mainstream. It’s a practical joke even I didn’t think they could pull off. And yet here we are…

Fox has gone from being the joke of the mainstream, the company sued for lying and blatant censorship multiple times in as much as such behavior is protected by the courts (there is no law that says “news” entertainment has to tell the truth), to what is the now lone defender of free speech today. Really? To that I must laugh out loud. It’s as if all those years of very bad reporting and censorship was just erased from the memories of what was the actual alternative listenership, a disorganized band of misfits trying desperately to appear organized like those mainstream corporations, but failing miserably.

Essentially, Fox News and its talk show hosts (non-news reporters) have filled the throne of Alex Jones, in that their sole responsibility is to guide the followers of this neo-alternative crap-fest into the dark light of secularism. The Jewish-Australian Rupert Murdoch-owned media conglomerate, in pretending to be Christian and pro-conservative constitutional America, is merely the new voice in the old predictive programming model of exposure without consequence, of talk with no action.

If I were to guess the most logical course, now that the powers that be have Truly played their Trump card, Fox News will continue warning about the “mainstream” media and its censorship, not for your benefit but because the plan is to de-platform Fox News just as other alternative news outlets have been. This is akin to a spy killing one of his own to prove he is not a spy. Imagine how you will feel then, believing that the one news outlet that appeared to be on your side is not dead, causing further separation and disorganization in a alternative movement that was dead before it was invented by political strategists long ago.

And that is my deepest concern here… Let us not be fooled that such limited, hand-selected coverage of what I clearly spelled out in my documentary, and what is spoken openly about in so many public forums on the subject, will actually have any affect. Anthony Fauchi, being clearly guilty of the crimes presented, did so under the license and legality of governmental protectionism, under the exception clauses provided in against the enactment of the Biological Weapons Convention and Act. These biological weapons are being created and reorganized at an astounding rate, where now every virus and toxin known to man has been weaponized under the guise of “peaceful” research protected by US Code.

Fox News is reporting just enough information to not accomplish any result, careful not to put any official blame or accusation on the guilty parties, and certainly not revealing what I have in my documentary. And it’s agenda seems to be some form of war with China in any way possible, the only real reason I can fathom for this much information being spread on the “China virus”. But make no mistake, Covid-19 comes from American research in American labs. Plausible deniability cannot be allowed to hypnotize further the crimes and complicity of this sick band of corporate and congressional opportunists responsible for recombining through gain of function research the most deadly viral weapons ever imaginable.

If you haven’t seen it, perhaps now you have a really good reason to watch. Because now it’s reached the mainstream. And before you are fooled into dismissing it as anything non-criminal, and before this controlled opposition leads you down the path that this accidental release of a duel-use, gain of function, biological weapon was anything but a known, warned against, and legally banned experiment, you really need to educate yourself on the full story…

To stop this madness, it will take more than a Fox News report designed to satiate and inspire the same old inaction and ‘I told you so‘ mentality that is the root of the inaction that drives the alternative sphere. When good men do nothing, especially when they site the law as their reason for inaction, then there are no good men left.

Meanwhile, just as the alternative media has done for decades, Fox News will continue to report on all the horrific things government does while at the same time salivating over the Untied States flag and constitution, causing the same old dissociative, patriotic Stockholm Syndrome we are continuously paralyzed by. And we will continue to worship both the source of our legal, fictional “rights” and the source of our greatest tyranny, for they are the same source. Therefore, in other words, good men will continue to do nothing because they mistake government and its legal system as that which will ultimately protect and save them. Good men will not act because they do not see what is right in front of them, that their captor is their hero, that history is a lie designed to cause that cult-like worship of a legal fiction, an artificial person (corporation) pretending to be a legitimate government, whose sole purpose is to legally protect a political and scientistic army destined to destroy every part of Nature in order to recreate it in their own image.

This documentary, along with an information sheet, was sent to every house and senate member, and to a vast majority of University and political members. It has been downloaded over 35,000 times by said members. The response has been dismally pathetic, insulting, and to say the least disheartening. There are no good men in these places.

I’d tell you to flood the inboxes of Steve Hilton and Fox News if I thought it would do any good. It won’t.

It is and always will be up to you…

.

–Clint richard-son (Realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Tuesday, January 26th, 2021

Lethal Injection 2: A Corruption Of Blood


Well folks, after a tedious 3-day delay of over 70 hours, my new documentary has been “censored” by Youtube for “copyright” claim, despite the protection of law that declares fair use protection for non-profit and educational and critical (critique) works. No money earned, no legitimate copyright claim. Copyright, of course, only protects greed and gain. Yet again we see that money corrupts all things… Not ironically, all videos presented in Lethal Injection 2 are downloaded from Youtube in the first place.

And so here’s the new plan…

Firstly, watch my short 4 minute farewell video to the corrupt Youtube/Google garbage heap of monopolistic incorporation, which strangely enough it did not ban, here:

–=–

Now, the good stuff:

Lethal Injection 2: A Corruption of Blood (Part 1) can now be seen on the following platforms. However, the film is still being uploaded and processed at Bitchute.

Bitchute (Red Pill Sunday School) channel:
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/sUSR…

Brighteon (Red Pill Sunday School) channel (MOVIE IS ALREADY POSTED AND READY TO HERE): https://www.brighteon.com/channels/redpillsundayschool

And finally, here’s your downloadable copies to keep and protect from all the slime that wants it burned:

The 1080 version (recommended):

https://www.mediafire.com/file/su2jgtfbg04gdlh/Lethal_Injection_2_-A_Corruption_of_Blood%2528Part_1%2529_1080p.mp4/file

And the 720 version:

https://www.mediafire.com/file/30o6pfykatop1b7/Lethal_Injection_2_-A_Corruption_of_Blood%2528Part_1%2529_720p.mp4/file

Please feel free to view and download these files freely as with all my works, or if you’d like to wait, a lower quality (smaller) file will be available within the next couple of days and posted above.

Please also share them freely as you see fit in both formats, remembering that the only thing that makes it lawful to do so is its perceived legal status, or in other words, please do not attempt to sell, rent, monitize, or profit from this movie in any way. Always keep it free and available to all people.

Future parts to come in 2021, if we live that long…

Have a spiritual, wonderful Christmas and enjoy.

All my love…

.

–Clint > richard-son (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Wednesday, December 23rd, 2020

A Roundtable With Dr. Judy Mikovits And Other Excursions Into Medical And Legal Madness


UPDATE #1: LETHAL INJECTION PART 2: A CORRUPTION OF BLOOD HAS OFFICIALLY BEEN CENSORED! A BADGE OF HONOR FOR SURE! LOOK FOR IT ON MY 2nd “RED PILL SUNDAY SCHOOL” CHANNEL, WHICH IS NOW ON BITCHUTE. I WILL POST IT HERE ON THIS BLOG TOMORROW AS WELL IF IT ALLOWS THE FILM. FILE DOWNLOAD LINKS WILL BE IN MY NEXT BLOG ENTRY IF CENSORED…

After being posted for a short time, the documentary has been censored.
Please stand by for the downloadable version and for a post on some other forum if I can do so.

–=–

UPDATE #2: – HERE AT THIS LINK IS AN ALTERNATIVE FILE OF THE JUDY MIKOVITS INTERVIEW:
https://www.transparentmediatruth.com/videos/Roundtable-22-Featuring-Sarah-Westall-Judy-Mikovitz-and-Clint-Richardson.mp4

As a backup, here is my newer Bitchute channel where the documentary will be placed next:

–=–

UPDATE #3: THE FILES FOR MY INTERVIEW WITH DEAN (https://www.deanreiner.com) CAN BE DOWNLOADED HERE:
https://wetransfer.com/downloads/a11856b08d50ebfceeb5201f2aa198d120201220082403/32dcce56499f63c5b36e6a39539b18b020201220082420/400d15/grid

–=–

I recently had the privilege of joining Dr. Judy Mikovits for an interview on Transparent Media Truth about Covid, the so-called mRNA vaccine, and other topics of equal importance. Please, if you or someone you know is planning to receive a Covid-19 RNA inoculation, especially if you are female, please watch this ultra-important interview. (Links- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dpYTxwnofZU) (Website – https://transparentmediatruth.com)

NOTE: THE LINK TO THIS BLATANTLY CENSORED INTERVIEW IS HERE: https://www.transparentmediatruth.com/videos/Roundtable-22-Featuring-Sarah-Westall-Judy-Mikovitz-and-Clint-Richardson.mp4

–=–

I was also back on with the Sholi-lama, Guber Mente 2020, a follow up to last month, speaking on a variety of topics including a deep dive into the genealogy of our illegitimate rulers and the usual shenanigans of that bloodline of parasitic vampires, as well as some more Coronavirus madness:

https://www.spreaker.com/user/sholzo/clint-is-back-w-shali-to-talk-aboot-mrna

–=–

I was on the Jim Duke Perspective back on the 6th of December:

https://tunein.com/radio/Jim-Duke-Perspective-p1005413/?topicId=159251275

–=–

Though not posted yet, you’ll find me soon on the Innerverse Podcast with Chance Garton, at the following web address:

https://www.innerversepodcast.com

–=–

Did the Spingola Speaks Show today as well, 3 hours of talk with RBN’s incessant commercial interruptions, posted here:

Hour 1: https://www.podbean.com/media/share/dir-v7ix4-c73c162?utm_campaign=w_share_ep&utm_medium=dlink&utm_source=w_share

Hour 2: https://www.podbean.com/media/share/dir-tdzwc-c73e3fd?utm_campaign=w_share_ep&utm_medium=dlink&utm_source=w_share

Hour 3: https://www.podbean.com/media/share/dir-rj8nd-c73e3fc?utm_campaign=w_share_ep&utm_medium=dlink&utm_source=w_share

–=–

Finally, I sat down with Dean Reiner, and though that hasn’t posted yet, it can be downloaded here for a short while till posted: https://wetransfer.com/downloads/a11856b08d50ebfceeb5201f2aa198d120201220082403/32dcce56499f63c5b36e6a39539b18b020201220082420/400d15/grid

Will be posted on the “Up Is Down” show at https://www.deanreiner.com

–=–

There are a few shows that were rescheduled, so I look forward still to being guest on the Higher Side Chat and Rule of Law Radio.

Remember to share!

Again, look for Lethal Injection Part 2: A Corruption of Blood tonight on Youtube, or come back right here to see it either posted or banned. I’ll let you know…

.

–Clint > richards-son (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Saturday, December 19th, 2020

So You Just Need One Good Reason Why Not To Get A SARS Vaccine?


So you just need one good reason why not to get an experimental SARS vaccine?

Well then, here it is…

Link–> https://2020news.de/en/dr-wodarg-and-dr-yeadon-request-a-stop-of-all-corona-vaccination-studies-and-call-for-co-signing-the-petition/

From the article:

–=–

On December 1, 2020, the ex-Pfizer head of respiratory research Dr. Michael Yeadon and the lung specialist and former head of the public health department Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg filed an application with the EMA, the European Medicine Agency responsible for EU-wide drug approval, for the immediate suspension of all SARS CoV 2 vaccine studies, in particular the BioNtech/Pfizer study on BNT162b (EudraCT number 2020-002641-42).

Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon demand that the studies – for the protection of the life and health of the volunteers – should not be continued until a study design is available that is suitable to address the significant safety concerns expressed by an increasing number of renowned scientists against the vaccine and the study design.

On the one hand, the petitioners demand that, due to the known lack of accuracy of the PCR test in a serious study, a so-called Sanger sequencing must be used. This is the only way to make reliable statements on the effectiveness of a vaccine against Covid-19. On the basis of the many different PCR tests of highly varying quality, neither the risk of disease nor a possible vaccine benefit can be determined with the necessary certainty, which is why testing the vaccine on humans is unethical per se.

Furthermore, they demand that it must be excluded, e.g. by means of animal experiments, that risks already known from previous studies, which partly originate from the nature of the corona viruses, can be realized. The concerns are directed in particular to the following points:

  • The formation of so-called “non-neutralizing antibodies” can lead to an exaggerated immune reaction, especially when the test person is confronted with the real, “wild” virus after vaccination. This so-called antibody-dependent amplification, ADE, has long been known from experiments with corona vaccines in cats, for example. In the course of these studies all cats that initially tolerated the vaccination well died after catching the wild virus.
  • The vaccinations are expected to produce antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. However, spike proteins also contain syncytin-homologous proteins, which are essential for the formation of the placenta in mammals such as humans. It must be absolutely ruled out that a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 could trigger an immune reaction against syncytin-1, as otherwise infertility of indefinite duration could result in vaccinated women.
  • The mRNA vaccines from BioNTech/Pfizer contain polyethylene glycol (PEG). 70% of people develop antibodies against this substance – this means that many people can develop allergic, potentially fatal reactions to the vaccination.
  • The much too short duration of the study does not allow a realistic estimation of the late effects. As in the narcolepsy cases after the swine flu vaccination, millions of healthy people would be exposed to an unacceptable risk if an emergency approval were to be granted and the possibility of observing the late effects of the vaccination were to follow. Nevertheless, BioNTech/Pfizer apparently submitted an application for emergency approval on December 1, 2020.

CALL FOR HELP: Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon ask as many EU citizens as possible to co-sign their petition by sending the e-mail prepared here to the EMA.

End Excerpt.

–=–

I’ve been wondering when sterilization would be found as a “side effect.” And while I will certainly feign no surprise, I will simply say that any woman that would get this vaccine before these questions are answered in triplicate is simply not human, not sane, wallowing in some twisted mix of Narcissism and Sociopathy. Sterilization is not an acceptable sacrifice for anything, let alone an unproven, apparently eugenic, experimental inoculation.

And, for both women and men, remember well what we learned from my Lethal Injection documentary – that reproductive organ xenotransplantation (inoculation) as a sterilization vaccine is used to sterilize wild horses and other animals, as well as human men and women, by creating the same type of antibody response against male and female reproductive organs, preventing spermatogenesis in males as well as birth control in females.

Haven’t seen Lethal Injection: The Story Of Vaccination?

Well then, now is a really good time to refresh your memory or see it for the first time. Why? Well, besides what is about to be sold to us in the form of a vaccine, as many of you know my new documentary Lethal Injection Part 2: A Corruption Of Blood is going to be posted very soon, likely by this weekend if I can do so. Much of the history covered in Part 1 will not be repeated, so I would recommend rewatching Part One as a primer for Part 2. And remember, this documentary will be a master class on the entire medical industry, totaling over several parts about 35-40 hours at best estimate. That means this first installment will barely even scratch the surface of the whole story behind this nightmare we are living through today. My promise to you: after watching this series, you will never again question what is the horrific story behind the story of vaccination, and will never again ask your doctor whether vaccination is right for you.

–=–

Wow! I posted this in 2011. Imagine what I’ve uncovered since then!

Look for Lethal Injection 2, coming this month, and God-willing this weekend!

Oh, and by the way, when I searched for that same page from the US Geological Survey on horse sterilization, it was gone. In its place? An updated, less informative page on the subject. Here’s a couple highlights of what it says today…

–=–

Link–> https://www.usgs.gov/centers/fort/science/wild-horse-and-burro-population-management?qt-science_center_objects=0#qt-science_center_objects

 …The U.S. Geological Survey and the Bureau of Land Management are cooperating on studies investigating the potential of fertility control drugs to reduce foaling rates. 

Molecular tagging is a new application of molecular genetic techniques to traditional mark-recapture methodology designed to address situations where traditional methods fail. In such studies, non-invasively collected samples (such as feces, feathers, or fur) are used as a source of DNA that is then genotyped at multiple loci such that each individual animal can be uniquely identified. Thus, each individual’s DNA represents a unique tag analogous to a band or other mark used in traditional mark-recapture studies.

…This study involves developing a new method for estimating horse population sizes based on non-invasive techniques; using genetic analysis of fecal samples (dung) and mark-recapture population estimation models. This research is in collaboration with Colorado State University and BLM.

FORT scientists are leading collaborative research projects to provide the BLM with better tools for managing expanding wild horse and burro populations. We are assessing the carrying capacity of wild horse habitats, behavioral effects of spaying mares and gelding a proportion of a herd’s stallions, testing the efficacy of an intrauterine device for mares, and evaluating four fertility-control tools for burros. We are also developing aerial survey techniques for burros, testing the use of DNA extracted from dung to count wild horses, and evaluating effects of cattle versus horses on sage- grouse habitat. Collaborators include Colorado State University, BLM, Oklahoma State University, University of Massachusetts, and APHIS.

–=–

Less info to be sure, but they are still up to their sterilization vaccine tricks. Again, see the first section of Lethal Injection Part 1 for the full detail on how sterilization vaccines work, which is the same reason this new vaccine will cause similar autoimmune sterilization.

It does however, point to a few studies that we should certainly take note of, which were the studies used to justify the continued use of these sterilization vaccines back in 2011. The first just happens to be the results of this previous sterilization campaign as originally covered by my documentary. Let’s see how their sterilization vaccine (an inoculation of pig ovary proteins [e.g. Porcine Zona Pellucida (PZP)] into the male and female horses faired…

–=–

Foaling rates in feral horses treated with the immunocontraceptive porcine zona pellucida

Wildlife Society BulletinBy: J.I. Ransom, J.E. Roelle, B.S. Cade, L. Coates-Markle, and A.J. Kane

Year Published: 2011

Abstract

Locally abundant feral horses (Equus caballus) can rapidly deplete available resources. Fertility control agents present promising nonlethal tools for reducing their population growth rates. We tested the effect of 2 forms of the immunocontraceptive porcine zona pellucida (PZP) on foaling rates in 3 populations of feral horses in the western United States. A liquid form requiring annual boosters was administered at Little Book Cliffs Wild Horse Range, Mesa County (CO), and Pryor Mountain Wild Horse Range, Bighorn County (WY) and Carbon County (MT), and a time-release pellet form designed to produce 2 yr of infertility was administered at McCullough Peaks Herd Management Area, Park County (WY). Average foaling rates (foals born/mare-yr) from direct observation of untreated and treated female horses (mares), 2004-2008, were 60.1% (n = 153 mare-yr) versus 6.6% (n = 91 mare-yr) at Little Book Cliffs, and 62.8% (n = 129 mare-yr) versus 17.7% (n = 79 mare-yr) at Pryor Mountain, respectively. At McCullough Peaks, mean annual foaling rates from 2006 to 2008 were 75.0% (n = 48 mare-yr) for untreated mares and 31.7% (n = 101 mare-yr) for treated mares. Controlling for age of mares and pretreatment differences in fertility, PZP reduced foaling rates in all 3 herds. The pellets used at McCullough Peaks (produced by cold evaporation) were less effective than pellets used in a previous trial and produced by heat extrusion. Immunocontraception with PZP may be a useful tool in reducing fertility rates in some western United States feral horse herds, but population growth reduction will depend on timely access to mares for inoculation and the proportion of mares that can be successfully treated. ?? 2011 The Wildlife Society.

–=–

In another study referenced, we find a different kind of “side effect” that perhaps we don’t speak of enough:

–=–

Contraception can lead to trophic asynchrony between birth pulse and resources

PLoS ONE
By: Jason I. Ransom, N. Thompson Hobbs, and Jason Bruemmer

Abstract

Abiotic inputs such as photoperiod and temperature can regulate reproductive cyclicity in many species. When humans perturb this process by intervening in reproductive cycles, the ecological consequences may be profound. Trophic mismatches between birth pulse and resources in wildlife species may cascade toward decreased survival and threaten the viability of small populations. We followed feral horses (Equus caballus) in three populations for a longitudinal study of the transient immunocontraceptive porcine zona pellucida (PZP), and found that repeated vaccinations extended the duration of infertility far beyond the targeted period. After the targeted years of infertility, the probability of parturition from post-treated females was 25.6% compared to 64.1% for untreated females, when the data were constrained only to females that had demonstrated fertility prior to the study. Estimated time to parturition increased 411.3 days per year of consecutive historical treatment. Births from untreated females in these temperate latitude populations were observed to peak in the middle of May, indicating peak conception occurred around the previous summer solstice. When the post-treated females did conceive and give birth, parturition was an estimated 31.5 days later than births from untreated females, resulting in asynchrony with peak forage availability. The latest neonate born to a post-treated female arrived 7.5 months after the peak in births from untreated females, indicating conception occurred within 24–31 days of the winter solstice. These results demonstrate surprising physiological plasticity for temperate latitude horses, and indicate that while photoperiod and temperature are powerful inputs driving the biological rhythms of conception and birth in horses, these inputs may not limit their ability to conceive under perturbed conditions. The protracted infertility observed in PZP-treated horses may be of benefit for managing overabundant wildlife, but also suggests caution for use in small refugia or rare species.

–=–

Are these studies talking about horses, or us? Or both? It’s hard to say. For these PZP vaccines are used in human sterilization as well.

For more information, here’s another study on the subject, for those that have that I don’t believe this conspiracy stuff attitude, here you can instead believe the scientific data:

–=–

Link–> https://www.bioscience.org/2017/v9s/af/492/2.htm

3. CONTRACEPTIVE VACCINES

The basic principle of contraceptive vaccine is to generate either humoral and/or cell mediated immune response against hormones/proteins that are critical for reproduction, which will lead to interference in their biological activity resulting in inhibition of fertility. Basically, contraceptive vaccines can be broadly categorised as those i) inhibit production of gamete (spermatozoa, egg); ii) inhibit gamete functions such as fertilization; and iii) inhibit gamete outcome. GnRH primarily synthesized and secreted by the hypothalamus (though extra-hypothalamic sites for its secretion have been reported) acts on the anterior pituitary and in turn regulate the production of luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH). Both, LH and FSH secreted by pituitary, in turn acts on testes and ovaries leading to production of sperm and oocytes, respectively. Thus neutralization of GnRH, LH and FSH or blocking LH/FSH receptor by generating specific antibodies may lead to inhibition of gamete production. Generation of immune response against spermatozoa- and/or egg-specific proteins will interfere in their respective functions thereby leading to inhibition of fertilization. Post-fertilization, the embryo synthesize and secrete human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), which has also been used as target for development of contraceptive vaccine for women (28). In the context of wildlife population management, contraceptive vaccines based on GnRH and zona pellucida (ZP) have been tried at the field level. Figure 1 illustrates the basic principle and steps at which the GnRH and ZP-based contraceptive vaccines will act thereby leading to inhibition of fertility. In the present review, both GnRH- and ZP-based contraceptive vaccines will be briefly discussed with respect to their contraceptive efficacy and safety. In addition, the current limitations with respect to contraceptive vaccine delivery in free-ranging wildlife and plausible solutions will be discussed.

–=–

When will you get it through your head, you live-stock, that your reproductive ability is a disease that needs an autoimmune vaccine against it? What more needs to be said? For now, ironically, you have it from the horses mouths – a former minister of health and a former Pharma head executive.

Or maybe they just retired to go into the conspiracy business…?

Please share this article with every and anyone you know that has or is expecting to have children in their lifetime. There is no turning back from this kind of reproductive harm.

.

–Clint richard-son (Realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Tuesday, December 8th, 2020

Current and Future Radio Appearances


Shows coming soon…

Rule Of Law Radio (Last week of November) –
http://www.ruleoflawradio.com

Higher Side Chats (2nd week of December) –
https://www.thehighersidechats.com

–=–

Most current shows now posted.

–=–

Spingola Speaks:
(October 3, 2020)

https://spingolaspeaks.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/2020-10-03-spingola.mp3

–=–

Guber Mente 2020 with Shollyac:
(November 8, 2020)

https://anchor.fm/sholzo/episodes/71–Clint-Richardson-returns–We-Talk-about-CV-and-More-em6i4b

–=–

Please Stop The Ride with Camille:
(November 9th, 2020)

–=–

The Illusion Delusion
(November 9, 2020)

–=–

The Ripple Effect:
(November 13, 2020)

–=–

While each show is certainly different, each of these are also somewhat receptively based on my new documentaries, while often leaking into my other works. Enjoy!

Special thanks to Matthew for getting the word out!

–Clint > richard-son (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Friday, November 13th, 2020

Radio Goo-Goo Tomorrow


Miss the days of old-fashioned live radio with your’s truly?

I’ve got a few upcoming and past shows to tell you about this month and next, but for now, I’m going to talk impromptu with Sholly of the Shollyac tribe tomorrow (Saturday) morning at 11am Eastern. Be square or be there…

Here’s the link:

https://www.spreaker.com/show/4301938

-Clint

Lethal Injection 2: Trailer #2


Coming early December… part 1 of Lethal Injection 2: A Corruption of Blood.

Here’s a clip you might recognize from one of my previous posts, now set to video.

Many of these images can be found here, along with the his-story behind them: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2018/06/28/doctors-good-actors-and-spokesmodels-for-very-bad-drugs-and-vaccines/

And don’t forget Trailer #1, which makes it all much more clear:

Remember, you are free to share and repost this as you wish, with no permission needed, just ask for a link (credit) back to this blog or my Red Pill Sunday School Youtube channel.

Maybe you and your friends and family should see this before deciding whether or not to get any more vaccines?

–Clint > richard-son (Realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Tuesday, November 3rd, 2020

New Documentary (Part 1): Wagging The Dog: The Story Behind The Story of Covid-19


Greetings…

Want to know what Covid-19 is and who invented it, and see the whole story behind the story of how all other Naturally occurring disease agents are turned into biological weapons like SARS-2 (Covid-19) and why these experiments are funded by your own government to be lab-grown? Want to finally understand what has happened to and who has taken over the medical, pharma, and so-called “scientific” industries?

In this short Red Pill show I simply introduce what is my current major project on SARS-2, which will eventually lead into the release of Part One of Lethal Injection 2: A Corruption Of Blood.

Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lu2NniDEttw

And finally, here it is, its full title being: Wagging The Dog: The Story Behind The Story of Covid-19: Part 1: Creating the Chimera.

Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OzQ4uEwCYwA

As always, but especially with this, I encourage you to share it freely and to feel free to copy, redistribute (free, without profit), and send this to every politician and professional you can find contact for, if for no other reason to show their complicity by ignoring it. You have permission to shorten it into a smaller version or as part of one of your own. This is a documentary for True researchers, for film-makers, and for all to learn, not for mere time-wasting, pointless entertainment. I hold no copyright or other legal title, only asking for credit and contact info to be included in any repost.

This is only part one, and there will be much more coming. Lethal Injection 2, Part 1, will be posted here within the next couple of months or sooner, and from then on other sections whenever I can, as well as the conclusion parts for Wagging The Dog, for there is so much more behind that story.

I say again, this is a life or death situation. If we ignore the crimes against Nature and the Scientific Method that are being perpetrated by these so-called, government/military funded “scientists” in their biological terrorism as defined by their own US Code, then what is coming down the road will make Covid-19 look like the rather strange and brain-damaging day in Disneyland it always is. If left unchecked, they will kill us.

The side effect of this film is that, once you see and understand this religious cult of scientism and how it’s infiltrated into all institutions of so-called arts and sciences, suddenly the truth is obvious and unmistakable, and the question of why the whole world seems so screwed up is answered – because it’s being run by sociopathic men that believe to be a so-called “scientist” is to play god, from doctors to astrophysicists to experimental researchers. Their goal is to change you, to improve you, to take a big crap all over God, Nature, Its Design and Its Law. They are the source of trans humanism, and their new vaccine is a transhumanist tool to reprogram your DNA through synthetic RNA, which is an essential step toward the futurist agenda.

As I’ve said from the beginning, there is a war against man and Nature, and you are right in the heart of it, though you hardly even comprehend it happening all around you. You pay for it through taxes, and you support it through voting and chatting and clicking like or dislike, thumb’s up or thumb’s down, on every artifice and shiny screen you see. You are essentially, through ignorance and inaction, funding and supporting your own disease and demise. You even watch movies depicting such apocalyptic landscapes, zombie hoards, and killer viral outbreaks. You’ve been made to love that which you should abhor, even to have a longing for such anarchic visions.

But now it’s time to wake up out of your sleep and defend that which is your Life, your substance, that which causes you existence. Time to fight and to protect that which Truly sustains you.

But first you must learn what is behind this current trickery and the biological weapons research that is and has been happening for decades right under your nose, from which Covid-19 emerged. Only with this knowledge may you justify your actions to defend yourself and your family from what these same, so-called “scientists” have stored up and just waiting to be “accidentally” released into the public.

.

Clint > richard-son (Realitybloger.wordpress.com)
Sunday, October 18, 2020

Publicists Wanted


Greetings to all…

As the title suggests, I am seeking one or more (an organized group of) publicists for help in getting both my work out to more platforms and to garner interviews and/or other “events” that would offer the opportunity for public speaking or debate.

As many of you know, I am just days away from releasing the first of several documentary films exposing the entire technocratic medical, pharmaceutical, university, and so-called “scientific communities” that make up the severely controlled industries built up around us to govern all things. Combined, these forces are the most sophisticated (unnecessarily complicated), prestigious (illusionary/tricky), and detrimental (life-threatening) force against our collective health and well-being ever constructed.

But what I have uncovered now goes beyond these grievances that, ineffectively, are generaly relegated to mere talking points between commercial radio shows. What you will see is an already well-established, well-inundated blueprint of a war against Nature, one more deadly and present than you can possibly imagine. Revolution is not a word that can describe what is needed right now. For what these so-called doctors and scientists are experimenting on and re-creating in labs are designed to kill every man, animal, plant, and microbe on Earth.

But I digress, for this will be shown in triplicate and completely sourced in my first documentary of the series, coming to you within the next week. Covid-19 is 100% a provable biological weapon, and as you will discover, in reality cannot be anything else. In other words, it’s characteristics (functions) cannot be biologically Created in Nature, only in a laboratory setting. You will no longer need to guess or wonder what it is nor who and what government agency is responsible and, God-willing, liable.

The problem is, they have also done similar biological weapons research on just about every other virus and pathogen known and even unknown to the public. Ebola, Zika, H5N1, HIV, and of course SARS and MERS are just the tip of the iceberg. They have re-created all of them through man-made mutation, known as gain of function (forced evolution/mutation) research. And the most astonishing part about this is that, behind closed doors, they speak openly and forthrightly about what they have done. In other words, these so-called “scientists” have done this research openly under the government funding and approval of none other than Anthony Fouchi and the National Institutes of Health. Yes, Fauchi is the head of this snake, and is actually in charge of lab-mutation experiments of extremely deadly viruses like already Highly Pathogenic H5N1, which by itself kills up to 60% of those it infects. But in the lab, these gain of function experiments mutate that already deadly virus to cause it to be, not only more deadly, but Fauchi has allowed it to be genetically re-designed so that it is now transmissible by human to human contact and airborne in mammals, functions that have never happened in Nature.

We are one accident away from this virus being accidentally or purposefully released into the Natural environment by what amounts to a bunch of sociopathic eugenicists, otherwise known as geneticists and so-called scientists. I cannot stress how important this information is, but I can say that nothing else in this world matters in comparison. And I tell you with all sincerity and diligence that we are on the verge of global extinction because of these many, man-made mutations of already deadly viruses, including SARS-2. If ever there was a time to revolt, to fight for our very lives and that of the Natural Order, I tell you now is that time. Tomorrow literally may be too late. Government already knows, so I won’t tell you to contact your congressman, except that then you can show them to be complicit, complacent, and already in the know when they do nothing about this. Legal bureaucracy will not fix this spiritual problem.

And so, again, I am seeking people who truly wish to help spread this information by helping me get this and future documentary films out there to any and every one possible, as well as promoting me as a guest so that I may promote the film series and warn people as well.

Honestly, years of censorship and disrespect has made me want to just sit back with a Corona and lime and watch the whole thing play out from my lawn chair, because that’s what happens to men whose warnings are unheeded and whose message is ignored for almost two decades. This is my last ditch effort. I will not continue if I cannot get the help I need, and in all honesty, believe that we all deserve what is coming and soon if we do not finally organize and fight these – what I can only call EVIL men in completely, irreversably corrupt institutions.

Lastly, I have decided that, after this series of what I am calling master class documentaries are finished, I will be ending this blog in order to turn many of the articles I’ve written on this blog into printed books, most likely by a print-on-demand service, because there is no way to compete against that industry. My blog posts and books will be edited, updated, and some even have the need to be finished, and combined into subject-oriented books. For instance, I’ve always wanted to write a book on the history and effect of the CAFR, government finance and wealth, and how pension funds like CalPERS have been the cornerstone of funding globalism.

So again, I’m seeking partners for the long haul here. Many of you have asked me how you can help, and this is my answer. Maybe someday I will even be able to pay you for your past services! I am looking for one or many people that are just waiting for an actual movement to form from this lame duck claptrap we call the alternative media. Life or death seems like a fairly motivating goal, though I’ve certainly been wrong and disappointed before.

So how about it? Are you up to the challenge? You are needed.

If this post isn’t enough to motivate you, then my upcoming film should certainly do the trick… unless, that is, you are already so far gone, so lacking in love and empathy, so narcissistic and/or sociopathic by this point that you simply don’t give a damn anymore.

Contact me at clint@strawmanstory.info for more information and to plan a strategy, as well as create a forum where those that wish may be organized and help support each other.

Honestly, I could use a good I.T. specialist as well. My website numbers are lower than ever, and I’m certain this is partially my fault for not knowing how to get the site in the top searches. I’ve not been able to find my blog at all from certain hotels and other chains.

Please note that I have no income, so I cannot pay anyone at this point. That might change in the future.

My immediate concern is reaching all outlets possible in the alternative and mainstream realm with a link to the film, that is, all doctors, activists, radio and TV hosts, and anyone at all affiliated with the vaccine movement, for or against, as well as all activists and doctors/scientists that have spoken out against this “gain of function” or “duel-use” (biological weapons) type research, and of course the usual email lists, Facebook type forums, and other websites and outlets.

I love and cherish you all, but it’s time to get off of your collective asses and fight like your life depends on it… because this time it actually does! The battle to preserve Nature and Its Law is being defeated without even a whimper of protest, and that means man will also fall when it does. For all of this research and mutation comes back to one and only one thing… TRANSHUMANISM – the destruction and rebuilding of Nature’s Design by men that believe they are scientifically appointed gods in the religion of scientism.

I wish I was being an alarmist, over-protective, or simply a mad conspiracy dude. But when you see this film, the theory is removed by their own admissions as they spell out the conspiracy for you. No logical fallacies and name-calling can help them defeat the messenger this time, because this COVID documentary is like watching criminals monologue their whole design and past and future actions as if no public access will ever be gained.

We simply cannot fight anything, let alone a virus, unless we know its source. This documentary is a showcase about those that created SARS as a lab-grown biological weapon in the first place mutating it into SARS-2. Most shockingly, though, is that Anthony Fauchi is the guy in charge of it all, from funding to actual mutation, something I’m sure he has not mentioned in any of his television appearances preceding the SARS-2 Covid-19 outbreak.

Makes you wonder what Trump knows…

Please help! If you don’t wish to be involved, consider making a gift/donation so that I might finish these films. I’ve still got a long way to go.

I may start a crowd-funding campaign as well, offering the final film on one thumb-drive with extras to pass out in activism. Will definitely need help with that.

I’d wish you well, but I know better now. I can only really wish you days, weeks, months, and maybe a few years of this so-called life.

.

–Clint > richard-son (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Monday, September 28th, 2020

Red Pill Sunday School S2 E4 – Strawman Book Pt.3


Welcome to the third installment of my third book, entitled Strawman Logic: A Choice Between Two Evils. As I continue reading and commenting on my latest, always free work, we finally get to the meat of the subject, that is, how our soul (spirit) is separated from us, so that our mind and body may be controlled (driven) without spiritual considerations, which is called incorporation (emancipation). To incorporate is to disallow spiritual action, to temporarily kill the souls of men, replacing the moral (unwritten) law with man’s (strict written) or Roman (contract) law. Without choice, without free will, there is only administrative law, otherwise known as bureaucracy. Once free will is replaced with merely empty choices leading to the same evil, the STRAWMAN is complete. This is the path we have all been tricked into following instead of (in the place of) the example of Christ (Logos). And now the purpose and intent of The Corporation Nation can be understood and, if the will is still there, overcome.

The choice is and always has been in your hand and yours alone.

.

–Clint richard-son (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Friday, July 10th, 2020

Red Pill Sunday School S2 E3 – Strawman Book Pt.2


Greetings Programs…

Here, for your consideration, is part 2 of my audio/video book entitled Strawman Logic: A Choice Between Two Evils.

Part 3 to come in the next week or so.

Thank you to all that have donated to support these works. Books are in the mail.

Be well, all.

.

–Clint < Richard-son (Realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Wednesday, June 17th, 2020

Red Pill Sunday School S2 E2 – Strawman Book Pt.1


Greetings programs!

After much hibernation and editing my new shows have arrived and will be posted over the next few weeks, around 15 hours in total.

Here is the first, Episode 2 of Season 2, which is an audio/video blog, which is myself reading, commenting, and clarifying my own new book.

The Title:

Strawman Logic: A Choice Between Two Evils

Link–> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pHqACcphrUw

–=–

I’ll post new files here and of course on You Tube for you.

In essence, after all these years of researching The Corporation Nation and what that means, I have finally come to understand how and why men are incorporated into these legal systems so as to be controlled (governed). Incorporation is the key. What this word actually means will certainly cause a spiritual awakening in you, if indeed you seek such enlightenment, for the very core and purpose of incorporating men is the stripping of the spirit (soul) from the mind and body, therefore to make free will (spiritually-based choice) impossible. To obtain the full essence this understanding, I present to you this master class in what it means to be incorporated (emancipated) into this legal hell we all find ourselves (apparently) trapped within.

To control men as a corporation is to take away the individual spirit (soul), removing the ability for each man to self-govern through spiritual, moral Law, the Law of Nature. Instead, the legal matrix presents a series of amoral choices between its own evils, turning choice into nothing but causality, where all choices uphold the corporation and its false law. He that cannot choose to say no at all times has no freedom of choice.

Enjoy…

.

–Clint >Richard-son (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Thursday, June 11, 2020

 

Red Pill Sunday School – Essential Update


Greetings Programs…

Firstly, for reasons still not clear, my STRAWMANSTORY.INFO website was completely removed from the net, since about the 12th of April, along with the email attached to it. I have now reestablished those sites, and can receive email again. If you made donations and are expecting a free book in the mail, I need you to please email me with the correct mailing address. And if you’ve sent any emails to me since the 12th of April, please resend if needed. Apologies for the problem. The book is downloadable again at that website, or click the banner at the top of this blog. As always, it’s a free download.

Now, just a note here to let you know what I’ve been working on in the background, and what to expect for the rest of the year.

My latest Strawman audio/video book is almost finished with editing, and I will be releasing that in four or so long parts on Red Pill Sunday School over the next month or two. Entitled Strawman Logic: A Choice Between Two Evils, this audio/visual book will answer many questions we’ve all had, including just what it means for a man to be incorporated, revealing the nature of this term corporation once and for all. Trust me, it’s not what you think, nor what I could have ever imagined. When free will is taken away, only false choices between presented evils remain. And so this book delves into what is the causality of this legal matrix vs. what is free will under the Law of Truth (God), why you cannot have both, and why hypocrisy rules supreme in all of us. Where has the spirit (soul) of men gone? This too will be answered.

After that, my documentary on the manmade origins of COVID-19 and all that surrounds this type of “gain of function” research will be released, again on my “Red Pill Sunday School” Youtube channel. Nothing is more frightening than what these psychopaths have done for decades in laboratory settings, except perhaps hearing them speak about their accomplishments themselves, and then realizing the same people responsible for the mutated virus have been put in charge of governing its response.

Finally, as promised for a long time, I will begin releasing in several parts my full documentary on the medical/pharmaceutical industry, called Lethal Injection 2: A Corruption Of Blood. This comprehensive investigation into the medical industry will, without a doubt, steal away any prestige (illusion/trickery) put forward as to the legitimacy of that corporate structure. When doctors are telling us not to trust most other doctors, when those doctors are shown to be the third leading cause of death in this and other countries, and when this cult of death and devastation is shown not only to be protected by the same government that invests, owns patents for, and regulates the practices and (malpractices) of these doctors and the drugs they carelessly prescribe, but that such malpractice is “insured” against and seldom listed as cause of death, then what else can I do but show these truths in one master class of a documentary? It’s my duty, and nothing is more fearful than a man like me, beholden to no-one and with nothing to lose.

–=–

That said, I greet thee again, you great and unwashed masses, under the pretext now assigned to you: NON-ESSENTIAL. How are all of my relegated-to-be unessential by government friends doing out there? Feeling a bit underwhelmed and uninspired by your new title?

Should we be concerned that a government full of known eugenicists have labeled most of us as non-essential customers? Is this not a sign of serious threat to our collective well-being?

Well, first I just want to assure you that you are, in Truth, the very essence of Life. Rest assured that to a spiritually dead legal corporation such as the United States, your True essence is not actually considered, only your employable (usable) benefit to that artificial corporation in mammon. Your spirit, your soul is not counted. However, to me and those that love you unconditionally, who Love all Life and Existence as the One True God, you are more essential than any words can clearly express. You are Existence. The only way to fight these devils that seek to destroy your soul, to remove your spirit, is to be essential to one another.

The Truth of the matter is that government has no essence, existing only in fiction. Like a vampire it sucks your essence dry in order to feed its unrequited need for the validation of its own reason to exist.

ESSENTIAL – adjective – [Latin essentialis.] Necessary to the constitution or existence of a thing. Piety and good works are essential to the christian character… 1. Important in the highest degree. Judgment is more essential to a general than courage… – noun – Existence; being. [Little used.] 1. First or constituent principles; as the essentials of religion. 2. The chief point; that which is most important. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictioanry of the English Language)

–=–

Note: When a government no longer considers its governed people as that which constitutes its reason for existence, you know you’ve got a real problem on your hands. You’ve got a false god…

The majority of you are apparently no longer deemed necessary to the existence of the United States corporation according to this definition, and now it has told you and even officially labelled you as non-essential chattel. And yet, ironically, I can think of nothing less essential than this very corrupt and despotic administrative state, a de-facto, bureaucratic commercial corporation falsely calling itself a legitimate source of government. It has now crossed the line of its own reason and purpose for existence, to serve man and country, becoming a false idol in, of, and toward itself and its own continuity, irregardless of the so-called common people that supposedly support and legitimize it. How can a government with a motto like “by the people, for the people” at the same time govern those apparent people under the guise of believing the majority of that same populace is non-essential to its existence? And what does being relegated to such a debasing, flattering title as “non-essential” mean in the end game? I shutter to think…

I can’t help like feeling we were just removed from the protected species list and relabeled as vermin unfit to be served or saved. How about you?

Did government just put an open contract hit out on we, its non-essential persons??

Meanwhile we have supposed “essential” nurses and doctors that are killing 85% of the COVID-19 patients they put on ventilators, having no clue what to do to treat the ill, then doing it again the next day under the same virtual blindfold. I suppose when your number one killing machine is the iatrogenic death caused by the medical industry, you would deem them essential useful idiots to help deal with we, the non-essential, non-useful idiots. Makes a sick sort of logic, actually.

Sound a bit over the top? My documentary will seal the deal for you, I assure you.

Oh, and did I mention doctors are the number one cause of bankruptcy in the United States?

Be well my fellow proles, peons, and serfs, despite being essentially screwed.

.

–Clint >Richard-son (Realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Wednesday, May 13th, 2020

 

 

The Golden Toilet Paper Conspiracy


Note: you have my (the author’s) permission to re-print, re-blog, and reproduce this article without asking me and without compensation, with the condition that credit is given with a website link to this blog attached therein. This goes for all of my research and writing.


Need I say, I told you so?

No. But it sure feels good to rub it in to all those contrarian detractors.

But let’s take the higher road instead by using this opportunity to learn from the current, unprecedented history we are making in these strange days.

Today’s lesson is on the difference between natural, inherent, intrinsic value and imaginary, acquired, extrinsic value. And for our example, we shall compare gold with toilet paper. Can you guess which one of these has inherent value and which depends upon a purely artificial one? I’m guessing with recent news and perhaps even personal experience you can probably now, possibly for the first time, clearly understand that difference.

But if you can’t, let’s sit back and toss this around for a minute.

Close your eyes. Imagine you are walking in the woods on a nice trail in the middle of God’s Country with no civilization to be seen. Suddenly, you realize that Mexican food you ate for lunch is signaling your bowels that it’s ready to be defecated and ready NOW! On the horizon, strangely enough, you spot two traveling salesmen, one selling gold at a discount and one selling toilet paper at an engrossed, extravagant cost. Right next to these kiosks is a public restroom, which displays a sign that says, due to a government-created bioweapon, this bathroom, the only one within 20 miles, is a BYOTP (bring your own toilet paper) installation.

Now, you have 100 dollars in your pocket. A single one-ounce-of-gold formed in the shape of a trinket (coin) is on your left, and a roll of toilet paper is on your right.

Which one do you choose?

Let’s put this another way…

It’s the apocalypse. You are in the same situation except this time you have a roll of toilet paper in your pocket. You come out of the artificial security provided by your pre-planned bug-out point in the forest with your small, completely dependent child and come upon the same situation, but this time there is only a gold salesman next to the toilet and he is selling gold trinkets (coins) that have no use or inherent value in such an apocalyptic state of existence. In other words, you can’t plant them, eat them, or wipe your ass with them, but they sure are pretty. The public toilet sits there next to this grocer of worthless trinkets (gold coins), once again devoid of toilet paper, and your child is squirming and signaling that he’s gotta go real bad. But the salesman is selling gold trinkets (coins) at a real good price, only one roll of toilet paper for a single, useless one-ounce coin! And it sure is pretty, my precious.

Now, you have only one roll of toilet paper and cannot imagine where you’ll find or even be able to trade for your next one. You have a toilet to your left without toilet paper and a kiosk on the right selling gold for toilet paper.

Which course do you choose?

Here’s a third scenario…

It’s the middle of another great or greater depression. Not hard to imagine. You are in the same situation as above except that this time there is a salesman selling toilet paper for $500 a roll, but is also willing to accept gold trinkets (coins) because he “knows a guy” that will buy them on behalf of some elitist politician that has everything he needs (including toilet paper) while everyone else is suffering in depression with stinky, smelly left hands because all “water rights” were previously purchased or taken by eminent domain by government. Like a fool, you collected gold coins when times were prosperous, greedy, and gainful, and so have a few of those inherently worthless gold coins in your pocket that no-one else wants, hoping someone remains among the plebeian dregs of this grand delusion of a depression that still recognizes the previous, artificial value in those symbolic trinkets (coins) made of 90% gold. And so, as your kid tugs at your pant leg and crosses his legs in an effort to avoid pooping in his dirty, worn out pants, and as you find yourself starting to feel the compulsive onslaught of that same Mexican fiesta (made from dried, rancid, storable bean powder you have hidden in the forest for years in preparation for this very moment), you must now decide which is more important, gold trinkets (coins) or a roll of toilet paper?

But the truth is, you already know. You’ve always known, though you might not admit it. For what is inherent and self-evident is always known to us. What is useful and what is purely a vanity or idol is also inherently known to us, though we may easily fall prey to the glittering charms of the commercial products of artifice and uselessness.

Is gold worthless? Of course not, says the brainwashed gold consumers and collectors that have been indoctrinated to believe by gold dealers and brokers that gold coins somehow have all sorts of uses. From jewelry to computers to all sorts of electronics, technology, and industrial machinery, gold is very useful to… oops, I forgot, it’s the middle of the greater depression and you’re bugged out in the forest. You have no electricity or fuel to run anything artificial, and powered technology obviously isn’t very useful after an apocalyptic event, now is it? No power outlets in the trees, right? Honestly, you don’t know how to use gold in any construction of technology, and you already sold the last of your once coveted jewelry just to feed yourself and your family for a few days back when people could still be fooled by its pretended value. And worst of all, your kid needs to take a shit, and quite frankly so do you – or leave a shit. Still can’t figure that one out. Can’t really take a dump, can I. That would be gross, though it might be more valuable than gold in this case, since technically I could use it as fertilizer.

But I digress…

The correct question is this: Is gold inherently worthless to the basic needs of man? Of course it is.

So what about toilet paper?

Well, let’s just say that I’m thinking about becoming a traveling bidet salesman right about now due to mass shortages and toilet paper riots at Costco and Walmart. Funny, because they all ran right by the jewelry counter with all those pure gold trinkets straight for the limited supply of butt-wipes.

And you know what Confusus said: He that goes to bed with itchy butt, often wake up with sticky finger.

As for the so-called value of gold, I’ve told you this many times, but let’s do it again, for old times sake…

–=–

“Golden calf, idol worshipped by the Hebrews during the period of the Exodus from Egypt in the 13th century BC and during the age of Jeroboam I, king of Israel, in the 10th century BC. Mentioned in Exodus 32 and I Kings 12 in the Old Testament, worship of the golden calf is seen as a supreme act of apostasy, the rejection of a faith once confessed. The figure is probably a representation of the Egyptian bull god Apis in the earlier period and of the Canaanite fertility god Baal in the latter. In Exodus 32 the Hebrews escaping Egypt asked Aaron, the brother of their leader Moses, to fashion a golden calf during the long absence of Moses on Mt. Sinai. Upon returning from the mountain with the tablets of the Law and seeing the people worshipping the golden calf, Moses broke the tablets (symbolic of breaking the covenant relationship with God) and had the idol melted down, pulverized, and mixed with water. The people were required to drink the mixture, an ordeal to separate the unfaithful (who later died in a plague) from the faithful (who lived). Defending the faith in the God revealed to Moses against the calf worshippers were the Levites, who became the priestly caste.”

–Encyclopedia Britannica

–=–

Let’s be clear, they (and you) are not worshiping the calf or even the gold that calf is made from. They are worshiping mammon. They are worshiping the artificial value of the golden calf, the fiction, the image, the idol, the idea, which necessarily means that what is real and needed by men is valued less, including the value of all life itself. It’s all about false valuation. It’s all about evil men convincing you that the value of what is real is less than its monetary valuation in mammon (i.e. money). It’s all about the inherent truth that money is the root of all evil. But more to the point of what the Bible tells us, it’s the belief (love) of money that is the root of all evil. To love or hate anything is to believe in its existence, that it has actual value. Belief (faith) is everything, for money is an instrument of pure faith, a symbol of value mistaken for being value itself.

The purpose of hoarding gold is only one, a hedge against the current, corrupted government structure. Why? Because the value of gold is set by that same government structure. Government is the bank. Government is the banker. Government is the money-changer. For without government, no standard valuation of money or gold and silver would exist. The mint is a government corporation. The SEC? Government. The Fed? Government. All money is property of government. And it can be confiscated from you (the user of another’s property) at any time.

The problem is, all governments in the end are ultimately revealed to be what they always were intended to be: Ponzi schemes. Their very design is to steal all that is real and replace the real with artificial representations of the real, namely certificates of legal (artificial) title. For example, one may hold gold certificates in place of actual gold. But this creates a whole new problem, for then those gold certificates are treated as financial instruments at both face value and potential (future) interest and thereby used as collateral on other artificial monetary transactions, until the point where the actual value of the actually held (physical) gold is hypothecated and reprojected so many times that for every actual ounce of real gold there are millions, billions, or trillions of derivatives and collaterals built upon it. Thus, they tell us that gold will reach $10,000 or much higher in monetary (artificial) value soon, and we wet our pants in excitement as we seek to purchase not the gold itself, for it has no use to us, but the idea of the gold being valuable. It’s a lie. It’s like a rare baseball trading card, which, if it merely gets wet, looses most or all its supposed, artificial value. Anything valued in money is of course a lie. And if gold is worth that much in artificial money, then that means the economy is collapsed and no one will be able to use that gold anyway. No economy, no computers, no machines, no nothing. And if the money is worthless (devalued) than so is the gold, for the purpose of holding gold is to boast and trade it in its monetary value.

In other words, the $10,000 gold is actually worth less than it was when it was only $1,000 gold, and was worth even more when it was at only $100. Why? Because the artificial money that gold was valued in was worth that much in gold. The fool would thus believe that $10,000 gold makes the gold that much more valuable than $100 gold, mistaking actual, inherent value with the artificial scarcity doctrine of supply and demand. You see, it’s not so much what the legal value of gold actually is, it’s how useful that gold is in reality that matters. And like the game of musical chairs, he that is left without an outlet to sell that gold is left holding worthless trinkets that were once worshiped in idolatry.

But don’t be fooled, for this is also exactly why government and its incorporate masters not only hoard but hold on to all the gold, because they know that in the future, the gold will once again be re-sellable at a mere $100 or even $10 in whatever new monetary system (government) they create and rule over, and that this means the currency is almost as valuable as the gold. But they also know that you will be fool enough to use your hoarded gold as money, not by desire but by necessity, for that which you will need will suddenly be realized as more important than the idolatry you suffered when you purchased that gold. You will not hold it. And they will have agents everywhere collecting it as you foolishly trade it for, oh, I don’t know, things you need like toilet paper! And so, by the time a new system is in place, you’ll have nothing to buy in. You’ll have to become a debt-slave once again, selling your labor for wages like the prostitute you’ll be forced to become once again. You’ll accept the mark of being their beast of burden, for you are and never were an invited member and practitioner of the cult of the golden calf.

Everything the devils (agents/attorneys) of government do is inverse to what they teach the idiocracy of the public masses to do, for their wealth depends upon our collective ignorance and greed, and especially your envious desire to be just like they are in artificial status and wealth. Pathetic. And so, in this new system, they’ll once again be the wealthy, upper-elitist class spreading the impossible dream that all the rest of us can someday be like them if we work honestly and obey their laws. LOL! Imagine that, organized, criminal thieves (government) telling their victims that if they act in virtue and honesty they can be just as wealthy as the thief is as those thieves keep continuously stealing everything we honestly earn. Imagine the money-changers telling us we can be like them. Imagine that we believe our labor is worth the money they create to enrich themselves through the extortion (taxation) of all of us.

So why do they hoard gold? More importantly, why in these final days of democracy and capitalism are they trying so hard to make known what even ten years ago was mostly unknown to the public? Why are they advertising on every channel that gold is so valuable and that you should buy it, or at least the idea of it in certified title? Why the sudden push to educate the plebeian masses about gold? Quite simply, it is they that will reset the valuation of money and of gold in that new system of mammon. Therefore, they must ensure that all common people are deceived into valuing gold in mammon. We must be fooled into the belief (love) of gold as money. We must be made to covet that which will make them wealthy in the future system that they create. It is they that benefit, not you, and all initial transfers of gold and money will not be open to the public, silly rabbits. A secondary market will be set up for you to sell your own minuscule hoarded bag of gold, so that you cannot become wealthy as they are, unable to dwell in that same upper-class status where, to them, money is no object. Money is only an object to us, for to them, money (cost) bars them from nothing. All that is required of you is belief in that artificial value that they create in their own artificial currency. All they require to carry such wealth and status is for you to lustfully desire a piece of their proprietary pie. They are the golden calves you really worship. Seeking their wealth and status is to seek your own place at the top of the Ponzi pyramid. But in the end, you must realize that money is created for one and only one reason, to keep you and I in both abject poverty (compared to them) and therefore in a state of spiritual death. Money is control. Government is the source of money. Do the math. The wealthy elite do not care about money, only the illusion (prestige) that money creates. They care only that you believe that because they hold billions in artificial (unprinted) money they have privilege and higher status.

And then they tell you that you can be just like them, if you just worship the religion of greed called capitalism. Little do you expect that the capita (head) refers to you and your property being what supports the money they create. For in law Latin capita (i.e. capitalism) means “by the head”, a reference to counting cattle, or in other words, property. Slaves.

—=—

The ultimate ownership of all property is in the State; individual so-called “ownership” is only by virtue of government, i.e. law, amounting to mere user; and user must be in accordance with law and subordinate to the necessities of the State.”

—Senate Document No. 43, 73D Congress, 1st Session, entitled: “Contracts Payable in Gold”, by George Cyrus Thorpe, submitted to the senate: April 17, 1933

—=—

“Under the new law [Public Laws of the 73rd Congress, March 9, 1933] the money is issued to the [Federal Reserve] banks in return for Government obligations, bills of exchange, drafts, notes, trade acceptances, and banker’s acceptances. The money will be worth 100 cents on the dollar, because it is backed by the credit of the Nation. It will represent a mortgage on all the homes and other property of all the people in the Nation. 

—2013 Congressional Record, March 9, 1933, House, Congressman Patman, 73rd Congress, Special Session, 1st Session, Volume 77, Part 1, p. 83

—=—

“I want to show you where the people are being imposed upon by reason of the delegation of this tremendous power. I invite your attention to the fact that section 16 of the Federal Reserve Act provides that whenever the Government of the United States issues and delivers money, Federal Reserve notes, which are based on the credit of the Nationthey represent a mortgage upon your home and my home, and upon all the property of all the people of the Nation–to the Federal Reserve agent, an interest charge shall be collected for the Government…”

—Congressional Record March 13, 1933, House, Congressman Patman, 73rd Congress, Special Session, 1st Session, Volume 77, Part 1, p. 292

—=—

“The people have a valid claim against the Federal reserve banks. We ought to find out the exact amount of the people’s claim and we should collect that amount immediately and the Federal reserve banks, having violated their charters, should be liquidated immediately. Unless this is done by us, I predict that the American people, outraged, robbed, pillaged, insulted, and betrayed as they are in their own land, will rise in their wrath and send a President here who will sweep the money changers out of the temple.

—Congressional Record, June 10, 1932, House, Congressman McFadden, 72nd Congress, 1st Session, Volume 75, Part 11, pp. 12602, 12603

—=—

At this point, it’s not so much that gold is worth $10,000 an ounce as it is that the dollar itself is at the same time invariably worthless. If gold trinkets are worth $10,000 or even $1,000,000 in worthless paper bills then gold is worth exactly what it’s valued in, worthless bills of legal tender owned by government. Congratulations, for you are the proud owner of that which has no inherent, intrinsic value. And that’s the point. When we seek that which we want and desire, especially wealth in any form, instead of that which we physically and spiritually need, then we are destined to lose. And they know you will ignorantly shed those worthless trinkets (gold coins) as soon as you realize they cannot even purchase a roll of toilet paper.

So what is the purpose of holding gold? Why build your own golden calf?

There is only one reason, the reason that government and its rulers hold it. They don’t trade it, they keep it hidden. For only the principals (rulers) and agents (voluntary slaves) of any legal money-based system seek such a hedge against its own pre-designed failure. As in another Bible story, the idolatry of gold is eventually built into a statue for the purposes of holding and finally trading in that gold to purchase money, and therefore a new, artificial status. Not old money, but new money, in a new system. Only the image printed upon that money changes. The money is still the same artificial construct in the new system, which emerges from the ashes of the old. It will still have no intrinsic, inherent value, nor can it ever have it. Its value will still be set legally (anti-God, against the Law and Laws of Nature) by the newly ordained government that creates it. Its use will still be bound by that government and its authoritarian legal code. Why? Because the money is always and exclusively property of government. All nations are valued on the world stage of commerce by this single distinguishing factor, the valuation of their unique, proprietary form of money as compared to all others. And those that use it will merely pick up where they left off – buying their way into that new system as voluntary slaves (subjects in citizenship). Meet the new boss, same as the old boss. Its name is mammon.

If this is not clear yet, let me put it as plainly as I can. The purpose of holding gold is to buy into the emerging New World (secular) Order. It’s to purchase a higher, wealthy (money-driven), artificial status in an artificial society. It’s to break all the moral laws, from Charity to Forgiveness. It’s to sell yourself out to the god of mammon and the false gods of that new system. And it has been this way since pre-Biblical times, over and over, until finally the beast system of world government is now coming to fruition before our eyes.

We are at a crossroads. For that whole system, that whole world (secular) order is dependent upon one and only one thing – your individual belief in the artificial value of gold and anything used as money. Without this faith in artificial valuation (mammon), no government can exist except out of complete tyranny and oppression. And so this fork in the road becomes quite clear, God (Jehovah) or mammon (monetary value). In other words, we shall either begin to cherish life and existence for its inherent, self-existent, spiritual value, or we shall fall deeper into the legal matrix and become willing slaves of the idol we artificially, immorally value it with. We shall either love and protect reality or fall deeper into the artificial matrix of mammon, of false valuation, of believing that the value in money of everything that exists is more valuable than actual existence, then life itself.

Your support of the artificial value of gold in the artificial valuation of government money (mammon) is necessary for this New World (secular) Order to come into its own false existence. Your belief in the valuation of all things in government money is what gives power and authority to the laws of government, for if you search with spiritual eyes, all government laws (US Code) have something to do with money. You are the key, the kindling that creates the fires of hell we desire to burn in. Without you there is no order out of chaos. Without your belief in artifice there can be no legal law governing that artifice they create. The New World Order depends solely upon your belief and use of its money, upon your idolatry of the golden calf.

Shit… and you thought this was just going to be about toilet paper.

.

–Clint > richard-son (Realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Friday, March 13th, 2020

 

Update


Oops. Never-mind. Withdrawn. Thanks for the comment (below), Wanda! Perfect example of how the media dumbs us down, and how no one is immune! Someone sent me those same numbers and I fell for it! Beware fake news, which is just another name for DISINFORMATION on every front, even the subconscious.

*** Note: I’m working diligently on the next audio book that will be the next 15 hour episode of Red Pill Sunday School, a full exploration of the strawman and the spiritual war we are currently in, which will be a reading of and commentary on a new, very long blog entry, essentially a new book. The average audio book is 10-13 hours long.

.

–Clint > richard-son
–Saturday, March 7th, 2020

Red Pill Sunday School S2 Episode 1


Greetings programs!

Apologies for the delay. Hope your holidays were swell. I have three radio shows to share with you…

This first episode is a combination of a few similar topics, and so is longer than most will be. But what a journey to discovery…

Remember, I only offer you the truth. It can be painful and it can be bittersweet. But in this episode, so many questions are answered and so many layers of word magic from the legal matrix are pulled away. Here is my new show, a deep study into the conspiracy of the organized system of religion, it’s foundation of idol worship, how it has purposefully hidden the name of God with masterful success, and once and for all how and why the Bible is indeed the foundation of the English and American common law systems. Deeply controversial as this subject is, I refuse to be silenced for finding and telling the truth out loud. Truth is the only possible freedom:

Here I appear with Eric77 again, speaking generally and historically about the War Powers, which you may have surprisingly heard a bit about lately as the congress considers limiting the War Powers of the presidency around invading Iran:

And here Jules and myself discuss current technological madness, CRISPR, and other futurist nightmares on Republic Broadcasting about a month ago:

Commercial free audio only:

From the network (with commercials audio only):

Hour 1 – https://www.republicbroadcastingarchives.org/spingola-speaks-w-deanna-spingola-december-7-2019-hour-1/

Hour 2 – https://www.republicbroadcastingarchives.org/spingola-speaks-w-deanna-spingola-december-7-2019-hour-2/

Hour 3 – https://www.republicbroadcastingarchives.org/spingola-speaks-w-deanna-spingola-december-7-2019-hour-3/

Until next show…

.

–Clint > Richards-son (Realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Sunday, January 12th, 2020

Red Pill Sunday School: Season 2 Begins


I’m back…

Season 2 of the Red Pill Sunday School show have now begun, starting with an introductory episode zero.

Here’s it is:

Here’s the link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2xA_SQXnWCo

–=–

With my new laptop, I’ve been writing a book proposal that will soon be presented to literary agents, and so firstly I’d like to give a huge thanks thanks to everyone that contributed toward that recent purchase. But as I speak of within this new, initial show, I’m asking for a bit of non-monetary action from you, if you please. The problem is, as you know, that I’ve consciously and intentionally steered well clear of any social media, the reasons for which are now headline news as the population broils in its own social narcissism and click-bait dopamine driven auto-responses, which of course is exactly what publishers want to see. In other words, they want to see that I already have potential “consumers” to buy a book that they would risk the publishing and promotion of. And so, though I find it distasteful to do so, I’m asking you all to please join and subscribe to the following social media pages so that I can show them I have a reasonably numerous enough audience, that is, a social media following. More explanation behind this request is in this new show…

Clint’s New “Red Pill” Social Media:

FACEBOOK: https://www.facebook.com/Red-Pill-Sunday-School-107028007451033
TWITTER – https://twitter.com/RedPillSchool1
YOUTUBE PAGE: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCsea7QKmWqZdMuwxW7sPyXQ

Now, if I could just figure out how to use these things. It’s been like teaching an old man to use a computer mouse.

As I plead of you in the show, I would ask of you here to please spread the word and the new show by sharing, reposting, and doing whatever one does in this social media realm to get my show and works out there. I honestly have no idea how to do that, so any effort on your part is much appreciated. Again, the reasons and apologetics for this request are stated in this first show.

I hope you enjoy the new season, and that the show brings a bit of light in through these dark times. So, why the new show? We can no longer merely chronicle our losing battle in this enduring, long-con of a spiritual war, we must reacquire our spirit from the trappings of this secular, legal order. And so, in show # 1 of season 2 we will delve into the trinity of the spiritually-driven man… the triune hierarchy of the soul (spirit), the mind, and the body. The spirit (soul) must control the mind, for the mind controls the body. Thus, a man without spirit (soul) has lost his own mind and no longer controls his body. This is called legal personhood. Debt slavery. The spiritual loss of free will. A man has no free will if his spirit (soul) is figuratively (legally) dead, his blood (inherent right) is corrupted, his mind controlled externally, and his labor whored out as a commodity for sale.

New shows will be posted on this blog, on Youtube, linked on Twitter and Facebook, etc., however, without any set schedule.

Thanks so much for your help! Enjoy and love one another, for we are all we have.

-Clint

Know Thy Enemy, Know Thyself, For War Is The Art Of Self-Deceit


Another interview here. Please listen to my host Eric’s sourced citations as we travel through the construct, where he calls out just who’s really behind everything. I was honestly taken by surprise by his continuous, poignant references to the hidden hand behind it all. Amusingly, the comments on Youtube suggest I was avoiding the subject, as if I didn’t want to talk about the “Order.” If I’m not being censored I’m being falsely or fallaciously judged. I was even called a “new age gnostic mystic!” LOL! I’m not even sure what that is, but it let’s me know that most of us are so offended by the truth that if our rhetoric doesn’t fall into some category or already established belief system, that when an original thinker comes along we simply can’t handle it because we can’t classify it. And so it’s easier to dismiss the information by dismissing its speaker, ad hominem, by categorizing him (me) into a nonsensical thing like this. In my defense, though I don’t really feel like I need one, I was listening and learning to Eric like everyone else in the process. So I say, well done Eric. But my lack of response was honestly one of admitted ignorance to the facts stated, meaning I simply didn’t know these facts. I didn’t really understand how powerful this Order is because it’s not been my main area of study for the last 8 years, and so my comments are more generalized to what I do know. Shocking. That must mean I’m a Jesuit agent as well as a Gnostic mystic new age what-ever-the-fuck I could be. My lack of commentary is not a covering up or protectionism of the Jesuits, but rather my own ignorance on the subject. Sorry to disappoint. But now my suspicions on the subject are certainly confirmed. And I invite you to learn as well, for here we find not only the lies and liars but the source of them. And to Eric, I say WOW, great research, and thank you.

We had a few audio issues on the recording, an echo, etc. that were addressed by the end, getting a bit worse in the middle. Par for the course. It’s worth sitting through though, me thinks, as quality does get better…

(See below for my show notes):

Eric’s website: https://www.reddit.com/r/Jesuitworldorder/

–=–

Show Notes:

Some helpful definitions and Bible passages for this interview, regarding the only True Doctrine, the Doctrine taught by Christ.

From Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language:

JESUIT – noun – s as z. One of the society of Jesus, so called, founded by Ignatius Loyola; a society remarkable for their cunning in propagating their principles.

JESUITIC, JESUITICAL – adjective – Pertaining to the Jesuits or their principles and arts1. Designing; cunning; deceitful; prevaricating.

JESUITISM – noun – The arts, principles and practices of the Jesuits1. Cunning, deceit; hypocrisy; prevarication; deceptive practices to effect a purpose.

JESUITED – adjective – Conforming to the principles of the Jesuits.

–=–

Post image

–=–

JUDAIZE – verb intransitive – To conform to the religious doctrines and rites of the JewsThey–prevailed on the Galatians to judaize so far as to observe the rites of Moses in various instances.

JUDAIZER – noun – One who conforms to the religion of the Jews.

JUDAICALLY – adverb – After the Jewish manner.

JUDAISM – noun – 1. The religious doctrines and rites of the Jews, as enjoined in the laws of Moses. Judaism was a temporary dispensation2. Conformity to the Jewish rites and ceremonies.

DOCTRINE – noun – [Latin , to teach.] 1. In a general sense, whatever is taught. Hence, a principle or position in any science; whatever is laid down as true by an instructor or master. The doctrines of the gospel are the principles or truths taught by Christ and his apostles. The doctrines of Plato are the principles which he taught. Hence a doctrine may be true or false; it may be a mere tenet or opinion. 2. The act of teaching. He taught them many things by parables, and said to them in his doctrine. Mark 4:23. Learning; knowledge. Whom shall he make to understand doctrine? Isaiah 28:94. The truths of the gospel in general. That they may adorn the doctrine of God our Savior in all things. Titus 2:15. Instruction and confirmation in the truths of the gospel. 2 Timothy 3:10.

–=–

Now we may really grasp here not only the concept of why we should be taking no other doctrine (truth/false truth) than that the scripture, but that we already have done so according to our status in society (personhood), our memberships to false corporate religions (artificial persons), and by our legalistic, secular, antichrist works. We cannot move forward, and we certainly cannot quit this legal matrix system, without first understanding how these false doctrines (truths) have been institutionally (corporately) forced upon us through our status (legal persona). The truth (God) will never be found in the legal systems and corporations (church and state) of man, for they are not of God’s realm, which is Truth, which is never built by the hands of men.

–=–

“…that thou mightest charge some that they teach no other doctrine (Law/Truth), Neither give heed to fables and endless genealogies, which minister questions, rather than godly edifying which is in faith: so do. Now the end of the commandment is charity out of a pure heart, and of a good conscience, and of faith (truth) unfeigned: From which some having swerved have turned aside unto vain jangling; Desiring to be teachers of the law; understanding neither what they say, nor whereof they affirm.”

—1 Timothy 1: 3-7, KJB

–=–

But refuse profane and old wives’ fables, and exercise thyself rather unto godliness.

—1Timothy 4:7, KJB

–=–

For there are many unruly and vain talkers and deceivers, specially they of the circumcision: Whose mouths must be stopped, who subvert whole houses, teaching things which they ought not, for filthy lucre’s (gain, advantage) sake. One of themselves, even a prophet of their own, said, The Cretians are alway liars, evil beasts, slow bellies. This witness is true. Wherefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith; Not giving heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that turn from the truth. Unto the pure all things are pure: but unto them that are defiled and unbelieving is nothing pure; but even their mind and conscience is defiled. They profess that they know God; but in works they deny him, being abominable (idolotrous), and disobedient, and unto every good work reprobate.

—Titus 1: 10-16, KJB

–=–

Strong’s #G2041 – ergon (ἔργον)WORKS From a primary (but obsolete) ergo (to work), used in the scriptures 176 times as the following words: work (152x), deed (22x), doing (1x), labour (1x).

Outline of Biblical Usage:

1. Business, employment, that which any one is occupied.

A. That which one undertakes to do, enterprise, undertaking.

2. Any product whatever, any thing accomplished by hand, art, industry, or mind.

3. An act, deed, thing done: the idea of working is emphasized in opposition to that which is less than work.

–=–

What is your job, your employment. How are you being used by the legal matrix? What is your occupation inside the evil, and what is the product of your labour? What art (lie) holds your mind? How are your actions in any way in tribute or worship of God? The Law, the Doctrine is clear that all of your works must be put forth to God. In other words, all that you do should be toward and in support of Truth, of Nature and Its Law, toward the charity and good will of and to all men. This not only defines but proves a true son of God, a follower (not idol worshiper) of the doctrine (truth) of Christ.

Thank you Eric, for clearing up the source behind it all!

Here’s an interesting lecture on the subject as well:

“John McGreevy helps us to understand the remarkable rebirth and flourishing of the Jesuits as a global order in a very short time in the 19th century, showing how the Jesuits in the United States, many of them refugees from expulsions in Europe, nurtured a Catholic modernity that served as a disciplined counter-cultural force operating through parishes, schools, and associations… He places the Jesuits at the center of a worldwide clash between Catholics and Liberal Nationalists…”

–=–

Until next time…

.

–Clint < richard-son (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Friday, October 18th, 2019

STRAWMAN 2: The Art Of Craig S


Greetings programs…

I wanted to share this recent video from Craig Stuckless, the fantastic artist that created and digitally rendered the cover of my first book, as he narrates his current work, which is intended to be the cover of Strawman: Part Two. The amount of work that goes into this type of production is mind-blowing, each stroke of the stylus reminding me of my own journey of researching and putting the puzzle-pieces together to form a final work, a connect-the-dots fusion combining the labors of love, time, and energy.

This is also a grand, professional lesson, for those interested in the digital art world, of which Craig has certainly been a part of, including that crazy world of super hero comics and Comicons. Yet he also explains his own frustrations at being all but censored for trying to include truth and activism into his own work, into a lost, nihilistic, melancholic post-modern culture, and the blowback from merely speaking such heresies (truths).

It’s an interesting ride, and I thank him with all my spirit for the time and effort he puts into these works without asking anything in return.

If you’d like to make a small donation specifically for Craig’s work, now that you see what it takes and what he puts into it so freely and without recompense, I would consider it a personal favor, one that he has not asked for and that is much overdue from my end. If you feel the calling, just send a donation to me at the link to the right with a special note “For Craig” and I will forward it to him, or he does speak toward the end about his own “tip jar” found at his site. Please send some words of appreciation as well for supporting me of all people!

–=–

Thanks Craig…

And no, the book is not close to being printed yet, sorry. I’m still working on a couple other projects that I deem equally important. My mind is tired and a bit sombre, and I don’t have enough fingers. Or maybe I’m just getting old…? Argh!

.

–Clint > richard-son
–Tuesday, October 15th, 2019

Recent Interviews


Don’t get called for much anymore, but here’s the latest few…

#1 & 2. Sholly visits Clint:

–=–

–=–

#3 On Republic with Camile, speaking about supreme court decision on vaccines and new fake foods, lab-grown meat, etc. (Very bad connection and sound quality here, sorry.)

https://spingolaspeaks.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/2019-09-14-spingola.mp3

Camile’s work and email:
👉 steemit.com/@camille1234
🖥 youtube.com/channel/UC_m1HUpNNfkb3x2cv9RrHjQ

.

Clint richard-son (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
Monday, September 30th, 2019

Zionist Israeli Jews Have Become The New Nazi Party


A short introduction behind the reason for this post and its title:

I found a comment today from someone trying to view my blog from their work. It said simply: my company’s proxy blocks the “realitybloger” because of “intolerence”.

So my blog is not tolerated because I’m intolerant, yet those not tolerating me and this blog remain tolerable despite their intolerance of me? Isn’t this an oxymoron? Is not censorship an act of intolerance? Or has the meaning of “free speech” been post-modernly redefined as revocable tolerated speech?

The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and other Zionist lobby strongholds in America and beyond have been causing such fallacious designations and defamations of my name and works for at least 8 years now. It works, is working, and yet, since it’s never happened to most goyim stuck in the social oblivion clickbait of Facebook puppy and kitten pics and vids, most seem to believe it’s not actually happening, convinced that this veiled whitewash of alternative writers and wiping away of truth in reporting masked as an anti-hate claptrap is just normal. It was eight years ago that just one single phone call from the ADL to my spineless local 630AM talkshow programing director got me restricted, booted, and banned from that station with prejudice, blanketing me as “antisemite” and “holocaust denier,” all because I promoted and quoted on air the documentary film “Defamation”, made by an Israeli Jew, that was a major critique of Abe Foxman and the ADL, as well as its excellently documented reveal of the institutionalized brainwashing-tourism that is being done to otherwise innocent children around the world, an induction into pointless, Zionist hatred for all other races, especially “white” people. They have certainly defamed me and shut me down, have gotten me censored again and again, and continuously taint my good name… and yet I’m apparently the intolerable one? What’s more, this intolerable act of censorship somehow passes as neo-social justice instead of unlawful slander.

Here’s that film, well worth the watch, for those that wish to see the brainwashing cult in action, destroying the innocence of children around the world:

Defamation

This inculturation of hate is happening to all children, even yours.
It’s called public education.

“Her family emigrated from Russia in the 19th century
because of the strong Zionist ideology.
The first Zionists came to Israel, or Palestine as it was then,
because they thought IT WAS THE ONLY (i.e. FINAL) SOLUTION TO ANTI-SEMITISM.”

–=–

And so I tell you, the reader, once again, the only way my blog will be seen is if you personally share it, recopy it, email it, pass it on, play it forward, without any permission needed by me. Otherwise, this Zionist thought-police lobbyist regime wins. That said, I dedicate this particular blog entry to one Abe Foxman, that rat-bastard behind it all at the ADL, because Abe, once you cause a man to have and to hold nothing to lose, once you’ve fallaciously done what you’ve done to a man, you’ve made an enemy far greater than what he ever might have been when those possessions and misguided beliefs in the fairness and opportunities ahead of him held him back, and bided his tongue. Perhaps I should thank you for this sense of infamous freedom?

The only real difference between myself and Abe, ironically, is that I don’t hate this man, possessing only pity and sadness for him. I certainly don’t have the power to censor him or his organizations as they do mine own, a fact that tells you exactly who controls the mainstream outlets of news and entertainment media and supposed internet freedom. I can’t imagine living my life in such deceit and treachery to all “races” and “ethnicities” but my own eugenic cult, while at the same time having to constantly trick and deceive all of us common goyim of your feigned friendship, as if you’re our protector instead of our infiltrator.

But the truth is, without anti-semitism, there is no semitism. It’s not a real thing. Think about it, I’ve personally never heard the term semitism used without the prefix “anti” in front of it. So where do I find the semite or those acting as semites, remembering that semite is a term of science defined as Arab and other “races” (bloodlines), including the ancient (not modern) Hebrews, and that the term “Jew” was added to that description of semite quite recently for political purposes. Not once have I heard the Jewish race referred to as the semites. Not once have I ever heard a “Jew” referred to as a semite. Semitic language? Yes. But a race? No. Doesn’t exist. Go ahead. Look it up. I’ll wait. Any dictionary will do, or at lease any one not edited by Zionists.

You see, the sociopath must have enemies to have existence, to be recognized as that which is the victim of the enemies it pretends. When a group’s self-identity relies solely on promoting anti-semitism, that is, hatred of its own group, as the basis for its rallying cry and social/political identity, then that ethnic (language-based) groups’ Zionist promoters must therefore strive to keep that hate alive, even when it can’t be found in most places and common people. It must propagandize and promote its own self-hatred. So they create it. They attack themselves and blame it on their “enemies,” which ironically are the actual Arab semites, that is, non-Jews.

I speak Hebrew therefore I am a semite? By that logic, anyone in the world from any race or background can call themselves a semite! And so even the legitimacy of actual and accepted scientific classification is destroyed by these Zionist sociopaths.

The Anti-Defamation League does the opposite of its clever title, seeking out or creating false-flag anti-semitism wherever it can. It does this because Zionist leaders know that without at least the perception of hatred from all other peoples, the Jew has no identity, no ground to stand on, no reason to exist in title, and certainly no desire or perceived need to unite as a “Jewish” people (i.e. state). This is called inversion, the oldest trick in the book, and one often portrayed as that used by the Devil itself. And with today’s media technologies and reach, it’s working very well.

But what use is media without putting on a show?

–=–

Palestinians arrest al-Qaeda ‘poseurs’

The Palestinian Authority arrested a group of collaborators who confessed they were WORKING FOR ISRAELposing as al-Qaeda operatives in the Palestinian territories,” said the official, on condition of anonymity.

He said the alleged collaborators sought to “discredit the Palestinian people, justify every Israeli crime and provide reasons to carry out a new (military) aggression in the Gaza Strip.

 The arrests come two days after Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon charged al-Qaeda militants were operating in Gaza and in Lebanon.

It was considered a surprise because the Gaza Strip is virtually sealed off by Israeli troops. The hardline Israeli leader also charged other members of the terror group were cooperating with Lebanon’s Shi’ite militia Hizbollah.”

Meanwhile, Israeli troops backed by tanks and helicopter gunships swept into the Bureij refugee camp in the Gaza Strip yesterday, sparking a gun battle and killing 10 people, Palestinian witnesses and medics said.

Army officials said the troops had met fierce resistance in the three-hour pre-dawn incursion, which it said was intended to root out militants responsible for attacks on troops in Gaza in a more than two-year Palestinian uprising for independence.

Source: https://www.smh.com.au/world/middle-east/palestinians-arrest-al-qaeda-poseurs-20021208-gdfxof.html

–=–

Rinse, wash, repeat.

Funny, Hitler and the Nazi party was accused of using false flag terror too!

In other words, the Israeli Mossad actively participates in practices of severe, violent, and often deadly defamation of their political and religious enemies, by first posing as their own enemy so that government and military crimes may continue unwarranted, as a pretended response. Problem, reaction, solution. They must create the perception of a public enemy when one is not attacking them legitimately. Nothing new, really, but certainly a trick that has been overplayed and reported on many times. So many times, in fact, that a US military intelligence gathering center reported on the day before September 11, 2001 about the Mossad:

Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target U.S. forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act.” —School of Advanced Military Studies (SAMS) report, about the the Israeli intelligence service MOSSAD, as reported in the Washington Post on September 10, 2001.

–=–

The point is that the purpose of the Anti-Defamation League is not to prevent defamation but to spread it, for the purposes of crushing dissenting views, and most importantly, the Truth about Zionism, the modern majority of secular-atheist Jews, Israel, and Palestine. And it will stop at nothing to fulfill its mission. It’s the protector of immorality.

Women’s March Leader Slams Jewish Group ADL, Claims It ‘Constantly Attacks Black People’

Tamika Mallory bashed the group and called her followers to boycott Starbucks after the coffee giant included ADL in its anti-bias training.

A Women’s March leader mired in controversy because of her association with the virulently anti-Semitic Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan has attacked Starbucks for including the Anti-Defamation League among its advisers on bias.

Tamika Mallory in a tweet Tuesday evening accused the Jewish group of “constantly attacking black and brown people.”

Source: https://www.haaretz.com/us-news/women-s-march-leader-slams-starbucks-for-including-adl-in-training-1.6012252

–=–

Of course, Star-bucks (codename: dollars for Israel) is often shown to be one of the greatest contributors to the “state” of Israel, appearing often on boycott lists, and so this ADL infiltration should not at all be a surprise to anyone not bamboozled already by the brainwashing effect of “non-bias” education in public schools, media, and government policy.

For more information on how Zionist groups promoting hate and prejudice have infiltrated every platform and level (grade) of the American education system, creating the “anti-bias” or what I call virtual book-burning curriculum and lesson-plans to be taught through the internationally borne Common Core, including deep inside the government and its military classrooms, please see my sourced essays here:

United States And Its Military Now Rotten To The CORE: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2013/10/21/united-states-and-its-military-now-rotten-to-the-core/

CORE: Making Children Stupider Around The World: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2013/08/29/core-making-children-stupider-around-the-world/

–=–

Finally, when it was publicly found out that recent, multiple bomb-threats being foisted upon Jewish schools and other institutions were actually the work of an Israeli duel-citizen in the United States, thus effectively ruining the ability of the ADL and other powerful Jewish lobbies and news outlets to use those threats of violence against them as ammunition and for influencing policy-changes and other Zionist infiltrations based on false flag hate crimes, good old Abe was there to save the day and still managed to spin the facts to the benefit of international Zionism. Caught red-handed in this clandestine action, one of many documented incidences of Israeli Jews and Mossad agents posing as non-jews and even Arabs and middle-eastern Arab-based terrorist members, they blame it all on a brain tumor. LOL!

Watch the master Zionist propagandist Foxman at work playing the victim instead of the infiltrator…

“I’ve known Donald Trump for 35 years.”

The message before the public found out the terrorist was an Israeli Jew?
Anti-semitism is all around you. Have fear, but carry on and stay calm.
Without it, there’s no point in pretending to be a semite!

And after the truth is revealed?
Don’t jump to conclusions. Still have fear, carry on, and stay calm.
Anti-semitism is still all around you. They all still hate you, Jews.

No apologies for blaming a fictional “white supremesist” for what was in reality
the Zionist, Israeli-backed, false flag terrorism of a Jewish, Zionist supremesist.

The real question: What did Foxman and the ADL know
that we didn’t before the truth came out publicly?

–=–

Abe Foxman was National Director of the Anti-Defamation League from 1987 to 2015, and is currently the League’s National Director Emeritus. In March 2016, he became head of the Center for the Study of Anti-Semitism at the Museum of Jewish Heritage in New York City. Will the real source of hatred, racial disparity, and defamation please stand up?

That’s your queue, Abe!

And now, on with the show…

–=–

Zionist Israeli Jews Have Become The New Nazi Party

Irony, especially when mixed with open, blatant hypocrisy, sometimes presents itself in strange ways as the events of history unfold so as to completely destroy the delusional foundational argument for such hypocritical groups to exist in the first place. So what happens when the supposed victim of terror can no longer hide the fact that it’s the actual, original terrorist?

If there is one thing Israel cries out for more than any other thing as its rallying cry, it’s the continued, uninterrupted, internationally (illegitimately) recognized and therefore secularly (legally) protected existence of the artificial, legal “state” of its Zionist self. But make no mistake, what has been formed from that foundational mold based on pretended victimhood and legitimate international exile is a bordered cesspool of absolute nepotism, despotism, hatred, and xenophobia. Zionist Elysium. What Israel has become is the most racist, eugenic-oriented, political model in the world, matching even its own historical narratives of that of its most demonized tormentors.

I urge you to view each of these videos before you can’t anymore, so as to understand the true nature behind the lie of the eternally victimized “Jew”. The parallels to Nazi Germany cannot be understated…

“It’s not too late. Start rounding up the infiltrators.
We don’t need to wait for the Supreme Court…”

“We’re (Jews are) racist because we want to preserve
our lives and our sanity. So I’m proud to be racist.
And it’s our right to be racist.”

“You (black Africans) should all be in camps,
not among us (jews) in the city.”

“Israel has vowed to remove some 38,000 illegal immigrants within months,
offering to pay them to leave.”

“More than 1,000 crossed the border into Israel each month,
until the Israeli army sealed the route with a fence in 2013.”

“If they grant me (deputy prime minister) all the tools
without exception, in less than a year, not a
single infiltrator will remain in the state of Israel.”

“Just a day after announcing a UN deal that would
resettle (TRANSFER) asylum seekers in Western countries like Canada,
Israel’s prime minister has just now cancelled the agreement altogether.”

“…his (the prime minister’s) Education Minister said the agreement
would allow Israel to become in his words an ‘infiltrators” paradise
using the word that many (Jews) here use for the asylum seekers.”

“What you see here along the Egyptian border is part of a bigger plan
by Israel to surround its entire territory with a high-tech fence.”

“The formidable barrier, which was completed in 2013,
all but choked off the flow of people (infiltrators, illegals, non-Jews)…
The aim of the project is to keep out what Benjamin Netanyahu,
the country’s right wing leader, calls the beasts in the 
neighborhood.”

–=–

So let us be clear, this is exactly what happened in Germany through the 1930’s and leading up to World War II, from the wall being built to the degradation of all “infiltrating” races and conditions. Same pig, different lipstick. In other words, Israel is emulating and practicing the policies and actions of Hitler and the Nazi party, the very demon they use as their excuse to “exist” as a Jewish state.

Inversely, we must view Zionist lobbies like the ADL in America and other nations, to see what they promote outside of Israel, which is the complete opposite of what they do. As Israel builds its fences and walls, it promotes the opposite for all other nations, open borders for all, not the least of all for the United States. And while in America these Jewish, Zionist lobbies demonize the United States for its porous but closed borders toward illegals from Central and South America, at the same time it hypocritically is finishing its own fences and walls to secure the borders of its illegitimately conquered eugenic-based territory, treating the Palestinians whose homes they “settled” (openly stole) as if they are the illegal ones, pretending Palestine somehow doesn’t really exist anymore, just as that part of Mexico that is now the United States somehow doesn’t exist anymore.

At the same time, Zionist lobbies like AIPAC and the ADL openly cheer, propagandize, and write policy for open boarders and promote citizenship for illegal occupiers, or what in its own Israeli state it calls as “infiltrators.”

According to its own website, the ADL “welcomes Administration and bipartisan Congressional support for reform that includes earned legalization with a path to citizenship for unauthorized immigrants already living in the United States, and states that US policymakers should support a pathway to earned citizenship for their neighbors who want nothing more than to come out of the shadows, to contribute to society, and to follow the rules without fear of deportation and separation from their loved ones.

Can the inversion be any thicker? In short, Israel has infiltrated American policy-making through the ADL and AIPAC, and as I have reported previously, is the creator of many policies and educational standards in US schools and universities, and even the military, not the least of which is its “holocaust education” program, the very program criticized in the movie Defamation. This hypocrisy is glaringly ridiculous even for the staunch supporter of Israel and the modern, so-called secular, Zionist Jew, the poor victims of racism and hatred. LOL! In truth, the international Zionists know two things for sure, that open boarders will destroy nations, including America, and that only by closing their own border can the “jewish” Zionist “state” be protected from “infiltrators” that refuse to adopt to Jewish culture, a Talmudic-based civil law, and of course a social-sanctioned antichrist, anti-Muslim religion.

But what is far less known to the public at large and seldom spoken about, due to the same fear and false-stigma of being called anti-semite or a holocaust denier, is the infamous Transfer Agreement. It was the actual “final solution” to the same exact “problem” happening in Israel, except in Germany it was called the “Jewish problem” instead of the “African, Black, Christian, or Muslim problem.” Hitler and the National Socialists, together in intention with the International Zionist Congress, formed an agreement to export (transfer) the Jews from Germany and into Palestine in order to begin the formation of a new “state” for exported Jews to populate. Seriously, just where do you think all the “Jews” came from to populate the new “state” of Israel? The problem was that those “Jews” in Germany preferentially identified themselves as Germans, not as Zionists Jews. Most knew that any political state for Jews would be against the Torah, or in other words, not built according to God’s Word. And so they had to be threatened and made afraid to stay in Germany, and yes, were even offered money to “transfer” to Palestine, lest this Zionist plot die before it started. Here again, we find the same thing happening in Israel today, where “Jews” internationally are paid to “transfer” to Israel.

–=–

Even 1% Jewish? Then go to Israel for Free, no Joke!

When my friend Dave told me about Birth Right a few years ago, I thought it sounded too good to be true. A 10 day free trip to Israel with airfare, hotels, and food all completely paid for?..No jew I knew would front that bill. Well, it was true, and a couple years back, just for being Jewish, I got to on one of the most fun, interesting and enlightening trips of my whole life… Birth Right is sponsored by Israel itself as well as some extremely wealthy Jews with the goal of building Jewish pride and support for the state of Israel. Of course there is a little brainwashing attempted, but its only fair, and it wasn´t that bad. They just talked about how being Jewish is more of a unique heritage than a religious devotion and how it’s important to preserve that heritage.

Source: http://www.theworldorbust.com/even-1-jewish-then-go-to-israel-for-free-no-joke/

–=–

Iran’s Jews reject cash offer to move to Israel

· Expats offer families £30,000 to emigrate
· Our identity is not for sale, say community leaders

Source: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2007/jul/12/israel.iran

–=–

ALIYAH: Your journey back to Israel begins here.

The Jewish Agency for Israel helps Jews take greater ownership over their stories in a very special way: we bring them home. All Jews, no matter where they were born, are Israeli citizens by right. If you’ve ever considered making the move to Israel, let us light the way.

Source: https://www.jewishagency.org/aliyah/

–=–

Think about that for a moment… imagine a communist Chinese Agency that specialized in paying US citizens to expatriate to China? The difference? When you move to Israel, for some completely insane reason, this is one of the few countries that the United States allows duel-citizenship with. Duel-citizenship. Allegiance to two foreign nations from each other? But it’s ok, we are friends of Israel. No problem. Why not just call duel Israeli citizenship with the US as what it is, a spy ring for Israel without sanction or consequence?

Just to be clear, as some in the alternative, patriot mythos out there believe there is a tangible difference between a national of and a citizen of the United States, let’s read government’s opinion instead:

Section 101(a)(22) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) states that “the term ‘national of the United States’ means (A) a citizen of the United States, or (B) a person who, though not a citizen of the United States, owes permanent allegiance to the United States.Therefore, U.S. citizens are also U.S. nationals. Non-citizen nationality status refers only individuals who were born either in American Samoa or on Swains Island to parents who are not citizens of the United States. The concept of dual nationality means that a person is a national of two countries at the same time. Each country has its own nationality laws based on its own policy. Persons may have dual nationality by automatic operation of different laws rather than by choice. For example, a child born in a foreign country to U.S. national parents may be both a U.S. national and a national of the country of birth. Or, an individual having one nationality at birth may naturalize at a later date in another country and become a dual national…

Dual nationals owe allegiance to both the United States and the foreign country. They are required to obey the laws of both countries, and either country has the right to enforce its laws. It is important to note the problems attendant to dual nationality. Claims of other countries upon U.S. dual-nationals often place them in situations where their obligations to one country are in conflict with the laws of the other. In addition, their dual nationality may hamper efforts of the U.S. Government to provide consular protection to them when they are abroad, especially when they are in the country of their second nationality.

Source: https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/legal/travel-legal-considerations/Advice-about-Possible-Loss-of-US-Nationality-Dual-Nationality/Dual-Nationality.html

–=–

So, in other words, in dealing with a Jew, the only thing that has changed is that now the Jew has a legal citizenship to a Jewish “state” instead of just being a nomadic citizen infiltrator into all other states, but their allegiance to “Israel” as a people before legal incorporation into a state hasn’t changed at all. The Jewish civil law (Talmud) hasn’t changed. What they do for or to America they do for Israel, as we’ve heard it said many times before.

And just whose land and home will these paid, imported “Jews” from other countries move into? We all know the answer. The term”settlement” is code for the militarily-protected theft of Palestinian/Arab (that is, actual semite) land and property.

So as to understand that the exact same intention of the Nazi (National Socialist) Party in Germany at the time of this Transfer Agreement and world war is today the same exact popular opinion of so-called Israeli Jews today, we must understand what really happened to all those Jews that were an unwelcome burden on the finally recovered, German economy after its social and economic destruction from World War I. The following is an excerpt from “The Jewish Declaration of War on Nazi Germany – The Economic Boycott of 1933”, from The Barnes Review, by M. Raphael Johnson, Ph.D…

–=–

To the Zionist leaders, Hitler’s assumption of power held out the possibility of a flow of Jewish immigrants to Palestine. Previously,the majority of German Jews, who identified themselves as Germans, had little sympathy with the Zionist cause of promoting the ingathering of world Jewry to Palestine. But the Zionists saw that only the anti-Semitic Hitler was likely to push the anti-Zionist German Jews into the arms of Zionism.

For all the modern-day wailing by worldwide supporters of Israel (not to mention the Israelis themselves) about “the Holocaust”, they neglect to mention that making the situation in Germany as uncomfortable for the Jews as possiblein cooperation with German National Socialismwas part of the plan.

Note to readers of this article who can also read German: a booklet discussing the emigration of Jews from Third Reich Germany, and the Transfer Agreement that facilitated their emigration, may be found here!

This was the genesis of the so-called Transfer Agreement, the agreement between Zionist Jews and the National Socialist government to transfer German Jewry to Palestine.

According to Jewish historian Walter Laqueur and many others, German Jews were far from convinced that immigration to Palestine was the answer. Furthermore, although the majority of German Jews refused to consider the Zionists as their political leaders, it is clear that Hitler protected and cooperated with the Zionists for the purposes of implementing the final solution: the mass transfer of Jews to the Middle East.

Edwin Black, in his massive tome The Transfer Agreement (Macmillan, 1984), stated that although most Jews did not want to flee to Palestine at all, due to the Zionist movement’s influence within Nazi Germany a Jew’s best chance of getting out of Germany was by emigrating to Palestine. In other words, the Transfer Agreement itself mandated that Jewish capital (money) could only go to Palestine (nowhere else).

Thus, according to the Zionists, a Jew could leave Germany only if he went to the Levant (Eastern Mediterranean/Palestine area).

It was one thing for the Zionists to subvert the anti-Nazi boycott. Zionism needed to transfer out the capital of German Jews, and merchandise was the only available medium. But soon Zionist leaders understood that the success of the future Jewish Palestinian economy would be inextricably bound up with the survival of the Nazi economy. So the Zionist leadership was compelled to go further. The German economy would have to be safeguarded, stabilized, and if necessary reinforced. Hence, the Nazi party and the Zionist organizers shared a common stake in the recovery of Germany….

The result was the understanding that Zionism would have to ally itself with National Socialism, so that the German government would not impede the flow of Jewish capital out of the country.

It served the Zionist interests at the time that Jews be loud in their denunciations of German practices against the Jews to scare them into the Levant, but, on the other hand, Laqueur states that “The Zionists became motivated not to jeopardize the German economy or currency.” In other words, the Zionist leadership of the Jewish Diaspora was one of subterfuge and underhandedness, with only the advent of German hostility towards Jewry convincing the world’s Jews that immigration was the only escape.

The fact is that the ultimate establishment of the state of Israel was based on fraud. The Zionists did not represent anything more than a small minority of German Jews in 1933.

On the one hand, the Zionist fathers of Israel wanted loud denunciations of Germany’s “cruelties” to the world’s Jews while at the same time demanding moderation so that the National Socialist government would remain stable, financially and politically. Thus Zionism boycotted the (1933) boycott.

For all intents and purposes, the National Socialist government was the best thing to happen to Zionism in its history, for it “proved” to many Jews that Europeans were irredeemably anti-Jewish and that Palestine was the only answer: Zionism came to represent the overwhelming majority of Jews solely by trickery and cooperation with Adolf Hitler.

For the Zionists, both the denunciations of German policies towards Jews (to keep Jews frightened), plus the reinvigoration of the German economy (for the sake of final resettlement) was imperative for the Zionist movement. Ironically, today the Zionist leaders of Israel complain bitterly about the horrific and inhuman regime of the National Socialists. So the fraud continues.

–End Excerpt

–=–

If we are to be honest, today’s Israeli citizens calling themselves as “Jews” are about as ill-informed on their own actual history as are Americans, and are about as unfamiliar with their religion as American “Christians” are with the Bible and Its Law. Ignorance is the conquerer of people. Ignorance is the foundation of nations (goyim holding companies).

Now, one might suddenly find a deliciously ridiculous irony today while coming out from under the “final solution” holocaust brainwashing programs that the ADL and other lobbies have gotten placed into public schools and universities, and even the military. The truth is that today in the illegitimate Zionist state of “Israel” these so-called persecuted “jews” have essentially become the quintessential model of that old National Socialist party, as they openly seek to put black Africans in concentration camps and to transfer them violently from that part of Palestine they so violently stole almost 60 years ago, spreading like a disease through outright theft of Palestinian lands and through absolute military oppression. This irony and the hypocrisy that it serves is so thick you could cut it with a knife.

Meanwhile, this legal terrorism and theft is happening every day:

Now you know where 3 billion in US funds are going,
not to mention all the duped Christians that
financially donate to such causes without understanding.

“The Palestinians in the east didn’t want to be part of this new country that they had just been annexed into…”

“Palestinians in East Jerusalem don’t want Israeli citizenship. They were annexed against their will into a country that doesn’t recognize their full rights.”

Do you see?
This is exactly how the German “Jews” felt before
they were violently transferred against their will to Palestine.

English military forces did this, not Jews. Why?
To reclaim that land for the royal family.

“British duplicity, British double-dealing, went a long way to perpetuate the conflict in Palestine.”

“During the first world war, the British, the French, and the Russians had these secret plans to carve up the Ottoman Empire, because they believed that would balance out their imperial ambitions, but tough luck for the Turks, the Arabs, and anyone else who got in the way.”

“Certainly all the seeds were planted then in the sense that it was the British who promised the Arabs independence on the one hand, and a Jewish homeland on the other, and could not simply reconcile one with the other.”

“Baron Rothschild once said of the project, without me, the Zionists could have done nothing. But without the Zionists, my work would have been dead.”

Money, indeed, is the root of and behind all evil, the life-blood and currency of devils.
But propaganda like this makes money appear as God-given, its changers like God’s chosen.
Make no mistake, it was the changers of money (mammon) that conquered Palestine.

“19 stripes of orthodoxy…”

“About 3/4 of Israeli’s are Jewish, but most of these are SECULAR JEWS, NON-PRACTICING.”

“And the rabbis are almost like pop stars. They have their own following…”

–=–

Inversely, I attempted to make the point that the opposite oppression, theft, and military presence simply cannot be found when it comes to the enemies of the Zionist, Jewish “settlers”. In other words, the Palestinians have no military presence, have no soldiers to help them harm Jews, and have no governmental power to prevent absolute crimes against them.

For better understanding of the plight of the real semites, the Arab and black African population of former (rightful) Palestine, see my essay here: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2014/11/12/searching-for-palestinian-soldiers/

What is a non-practicing Jew? Is this an oxymoron, or a harsh, culturally xenophobic, hidden truth? Is Jewishness something that must be practiced, like Christianity, in order to be called a Jew? Apparently not. Essentially, Christians are supporting an almost completely secular, atheist state. Why? Because they are Jews? Non-practicing Jews. That’s would be like creating a Veterans center for non-serving vets. Vets that never served (practiced) in the military. That’s just not possible. I can’t be a non-practicing American, now can I? And that’s because Jewish identity isn’t real, its imaginary. It’s a front for persons participating in a cult of mass eugenics. It’s based on a lie, not race nor religion. The truth is that they don’t even know what they are!

The only way this question of what is a non-practicing Jew can be answered is to understand that Jews are not what you think they are nor what they think they are, and that as long as you continue to equate Jews as friendly to Christians and Christianity instead of as antichrist (opposed to Christianity except through trickery and deceit), then the trickery and international infiltration will continue, and Christians and US citizens will unwittingly continue to monetarily (in mammon) support that which is antichrist. To support Israel is to support crimes against humanity, theft of estates held for generations by innocent Arab families, and worst of all is to declare that a Jew (Ἰουδαῖοι) is not what the Bible warns us it is.

Please read the lexicon for Jew here: https://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?Strongs=G2453&t=KJV

Notice that in this Bible lexicon entry, the term “Jewish” refers to being “joined to nouns (names),” and that the word shem, as the tribe or generation of shem, means name. Jews are the tribe of those that are joined by names (nouns), just as the Royal families. They are one in the same, an artificial, incorporated “family” joined by meticulously charted, genealogically kept names. This term also refers to Jewishness (adjective) as being before the exile, whereas the Jew (noun) or Ἰουδαῖοι is descriptive of Jews after the exile, all the Israelites (cf. Wright in B. D. under the word )), the Jews… who live in foreign lands, among the Gentiles. In other words, these are not the same people. They are literally Jewish by name (noun), not by action, not by faith, not by race, not by spirituality… only through secular means. They are about as Jewish as the royal families are actually followers of Christ, that is, not at all. It’s all for show. Their identity and authority is based only upon their name (noun/flattering title). I cannot tell you how important this is to understand. 

For my full breakdown using only Jewish sources on what exactly is a Jew, please listen here: https://corporationnationradioarchives.wordpress.com/2017/10/22/red-pill-sunday-school-episode-6-october-22-2017/

You think this isn’t happening in America? You think the same Zionist influences aren’t perched right now in the highest places as your own burden? Think my censorship could have come from any other organized group? Think Christian prosperity preaching isn’t Zionism by another name (noun)? Think when you donate to Jewish organizations your money isn’t going to expand and steal the land and property that is anciently considered “Greater Israel” by Zionist Jews, another name for new Babylon, which is wholly against the New Testament of Christ?

Now, let’s be clear, the secular “Jews” (by name only) that inhabit Zionist Israel are acting exactly as they insistently and institutionally portray the German citizens as acting during the 1930’s and 40’s. And the biggest Zionist shill of them all is your acting president in the United States:


Trump signs declaration recognizing Israel’s sovereignty over disputed Golan Heights

Zionism to the extreme.
Presidential front-runner speaks to pro-Israel audience at AIPAC.

Christians United For Israel? Is this a practical joke? Yes!

Careful, this snake dresses as a sheep but is a ravenous, Zionist wolf.

Listen closely, for there is no mention of Christ here.
There is no support for Christianity here, except in trickery for its support of Israel.
There’s no reading from the New (Christian) Testament,
only the Old testament, the Jewish Law, the Torah is spoken of.
There are no shared values in any way.
The PM’s message is religious tolerance, the tolerance of Christians for antichrist Jews.
This is not what the Bible or Jesus Christ teaches or exemplifies.

“The first book of Samuel tells the story of Israel’s transition from a theocracy,
or state ruled by a religious leader, to a monarchy, or state ruled by a political leader.
Israel starts out as a nation of loosely affiliated tribes led by priests and religious heroes,
but it becomes a nation-state led by a centralized king.”

–=–

What the PM fails to mention here is that it’s the very fact that those tribes of what was true Israel (a people following God’s Law) were not legalized under secular law into a government, and that this fact is what made them Israelites, that they did not subscribe to the legalist law over God’s Law. In essence, Netanyahu admits here that the modern, legal, secular “state” of Israel has nothing to do with what was once called the Israelites – a people of God. Israel is not a theocracy, but a state ruled by a political leader, or in other words, modern Israel represents the state of Jews that are the fallen Israelites.

Israel… the only democracy in the middle east? That’s why America should protect it? LOL! You really need to be ignorant of history to believe that line of BS. Actually, the founding fathers of America where vehemently opposed to democracy in every way. But Democracy, according to its Marxist, communist, and Zionist promoters is the key to turning any nation towards socialism, next step communism. Communitarianism. I’ve posted these relevant quotes absolutely against democracy many times on this blog, and of course Plato in his five regimes essay lists democracy as the last step before tyranny. Yet always at the top of the regime cycle we find some religious, spiritually-based reason for an aristocracy to rule. Israel is not immune, obviously, from Plato’s views on the political degradation of all societies into democracy followed by anarchy (lawlessness) and despotism.

Israel (a corporation, an artificial person) apparently has the right to defend itself, but Palestinians do not. Why? Because Trump is obviously a Zionist. As Joe Biden publicly stated in his support for that illegitimate state, “you don’t have to be a Jew to be a Zionist.” Hey, if Israel is legitimate, why does it need a dictator like Trump and the American and English militaries to conquer and declare it as such? Why is it still labeled as an “occupied territory” according to the United Nations if Palestine doesn’t exist? The answer should be obvious. But oh, the propaganda…

And so we see these secularist, ADL brainwashed Jews of today, who base their whole identity on suffering, torment, hatred, and persecution, now committing the same eugenic, racially motivated crimes against humanity that they claim make themselves as self-identified Jews. And by this utter self-deceit and false historical narrative they are justifying the same exact behavior (if not worse) that they claim was put upon their ancestors. In fact, without that completely exaggerated Jewish holocaust history that somehow completely dismisses the Transfer Agreement, there would be no Jewish identity, and therefore no hostile Zionist takeover of the lands England has desired to re-aquire since the 1200’s when it lost its “Kingdom of Jerusalem” in the first place. Jews didn’t take the land, English forces did, as shown in the documentary above. And only then could Hitler’s and International Zionism’s final solution transfer agreement be fulfilled, the transfer of international Jewry as political pawns into Palestine as justification for the erection of the false, illegitimate, secular state of Israel. And yet here the Zionist-influenced Israeli Jews are doing the same exact thing, forcibly transferring out their unwanted black refugees because, as the Jews did in Germany and so many other countries they infiltrated, they are trying to preserve a now 6 decade old facade of culture based on lies and self-deceit, while demonizing all other cultures, colors, and creeds that seek the same thing.

For your consideration, this purposefully managed and directed migration of Jews was the genesis and ultimate goal of what was called the Transfer Agreement, an agreement between Zionist Jews and the National Socialist government to transfer German and German occupied Jewry to Palestine as the final solution.

–=–

Shoah Resource Center, The International School for Holocaust Studies

Extract from the Speech by Hitler, January 30, 1939:

 

…In connection with the Jewish question I have this to say: it is a shameful spectacle to see how the whole democratic world is oozing sympathy for the poor tormented Jewish people, but remains hard-hearted and obdurate when it comes to helping them which is surely, in view of its attitude, an obvious duty. The arguments that are brought up as an excuse for not helping them actually speak for us Germans and Italians.

For this is what they say:

1. We,” that is the democracies, “are not in a position to take in the Jews.” Yet in these empires there are not 10 people to the square kilometerWhile Germany, with her 135 inhabitants to the square kilometer, is supposed to have room for them!

2. They assure us: We cannot take them unless Germany is prepared to allow them a certain amount of capital to bring with them as immigrants.

For hundreds of years Germany was good enough to receive these elements, although they possessed nothing except infectious political and physical diseases. What they possess today, they have by a very large extent gained at the cost of the less astute German nation by the most reprehensible manipulations.

Today we are merely paying this people what it deserves. When the German nation was, thanks to the inflation instigated and carried through by Jews,deprived of the entire savings which it had accumulated in years of honest workwhen the rest of the world took away the German nation’s foreign investmentswhen we were divested of the whole of our colonial possessions, these philanthropic considerations evidently carried little noticeable weight with democratic statesmen.

Today I can only assure these gentlemen that, thanks to the brutal education with which the democracies favored us for fifteen years, we are completely hardened to all attacks of sentiment. After more than eight hundred thousand children of the nation had died of hunger and undernourishment at the close of the War, we witnessed almost one million head of milking cows being driven away from us in accordance with the cruel paragraphs of a dictate which the humane democratic apostles of the world forced upon us as a peace treaty. We witnessed over one million German prisoners of war being retained in confinement for no reason at all for a whole year after the War was ended. We witnessed over one and a half million Germans being torn away from all that they possessed in the territories lying on our frontiers, and being whipped out with practically only what they wore on their backs. We had to endure having millions of our fellow countrymen torn from us without their consent, and without their being afforded the slightest possibility of existence. I could supplement these examples with dozens of the most cruel kind. For this reason we ask to be spared all sentimental talk. The German nation does not wish its interests to be determined and controlled by any foreign nation. France to the French, England to the English, America to the Americans, and Germany to the GermansWe are resolved to prevent the settlement in our country of a strange people which was capable of snatching for itself all the leading positions in the land, and to oust it. For it is our will to educate our own nation for these leading positions. We have hundreds of thousands of very intelligent children of peasants and of the working classes. We shall have them educatedin fact we have already begun and we wish that one day they, and not the representatives of an alien race, may hold the leading positions in the State together with our educated classes. Above all, German culture, as its name alone shows, is German and not Jewish, and therefore its management and care will be entrusted to members of our own nation. If the rest of the world cries out with a hypocritical mien against this barbaric expulsion from Germany of such an irreplaceable and culturally eminently valuable element, we can only be astonished at the conclusions they draw from this situation. For how thankful they must be that we are releasing these precious apostles of culture, and placing them at the disposal of the rest of the world. In accordance with their own declarations they cannot find a single reason to excuse themselves for refusing to receive this most valuable race in their own countries. Nor can I see a reason why the members of this race should be imposed upon the German nation, while in the States, which are so enthusiastic about thesesplendid people,” their settlement should suddenly be refused with every imaginable excuse. I think that the sooner this problem is solved the better; for Europe cannot settle down until the Jewish question is cleared up. It may very well be possible that sooner or later an AGREEMENT on this problem may be reached in Europe, even between those nations which otherwise do not so easily come together.

The world has sufficient space for settlementsbut we must once and for all get rid of the opinion that the Jewish race was only created by God for the purpose of being in a certain percentage a parasite living on the body and the productive work of other nationsThe Jewish race will have to adapt itself to sound constructive activity as other nations do, or sooner or later it will succumb to a crisis of an inconceivable magnitude.

One thing I should like to say on this day which may be memorable for others as well as for us Germans: In the course of my life I have very often been a prophet, and have usually been ridiculed for it. During the time of my struggle for power it was in the first instance the Jewish race which only received my prophecies with laughter when I said that I would one day take over the leadership of the State, and with it that of the whole nation, and that I would then among many other things settle the Jewish problem. Their laughter was uproarious, but I think that for some time now they have been laughing on the other side of their face. Today I will once more be a prophet: If the international Jewish financiers in and outside Europe should succeed in plunging the nations once more into a world war, then the result will not be the Bolshevization of the earth, and thus the victory of Jewry, but the annihilation of the Jewish race in Europe!

The nations are no longer willing to die on the battlefield so that this unstable international race may profiteer from a war or satisfy its Old Testament vengeance. The Jewish watchwordWorkers of the world unitewill be conquered by a higher realization, namelyWorkers of all classes and of all nations, recognize your common enemy!”

Source: N.H. Baynes, ed., The Speeches of Adolf Hitler, I, London, 1942, pp. 737-741. See Document 4.

–=–

And so the Jews were transferred and reformed into a parasitic “state” called Israel. They did not take the advice of Hitler. They continue to parasite off of other nations, building massive spying technology corporations as a strange bedfellow and “unbreakable” partner of the United States. None of this makes sense, that is, unless you are a Zionist. Without the United States and its yearly billions of free money, grants, and investments, Israel would fall tomorrow. And that tells you that Zionism is not merely influencing but running the three branches of the government of United States!

Dare I state the truth here, that what these internationally organized Zionist Jews have today, both in corporate municipal Israel and elsewhere, equals what Hitler said long ago, that they have by a very large extent gained at the cost of the less astute German nation by the most reprehensible manipulations? Dare I quote Hitler here and be allowed to exist? Am I to be labeled as anti-semite or holocaust denier because I seek the truth and recognize that the real holocaust deniers are apparently manifesting themselves as the Zionist-brainwashed and inculturated Jews occupying Palestine and calling it “Israel” against even the Judaic orthodoxy of God’s Law and Will in every way possible? Shall I refer the reader again to Hitler’s words above, For how thankful they must be that we are releasing these precious apostles of culture, and placing them at the disposal of the rest of the world. In other words, they didn’t kill the Jews as the Zionist propagandists continuously declare in every media outlet and movie possible. They transferred them to Palestine, just as today the Zionist, Israeli Jews are making it extremely dangerous and uncomfortable for Black African refugees to remain in Israel, and either paying them or forcibly removing them into camps while they wait to be transferred out. It’s the same Zionist, Nazi transfer agreement, but inverted for the benefit of the Zionist “state” against its own “infiltrators”. Again, the irony is like a bad fart here. Is it not the worst kind of denial of one’s own political identity to ignore and then repeat every atrocious aspect and public opinion of what Hitler and the National Socialist Germany did to Jews through cooperation with the International Zionists? Do these “Jews” not see that they have literally and in every possible way manifested Hitler’s policies by their own actions against another race? 

You tell me, after reading the above statements and viewing those documentary clips… what is the difference between a Zionist influenced Israeli Jew and a National Socialist influenced German?

And riddle me this… what part of Hitler’s genuine concern for the fate of these international Jews is not clear? His warnings are unmistakable. He speaks of a select group of international Jewish (Zionist) financiers that were then and are now plunging us all into a new world war situation, in an effort towards the Bolshevization of the Earth, which can lead to only two outcomes… either the nations once again expel the Jews as a common enemy and refuse them nationhood to protect and preserve peace through the dismantling of Israel and expulsion of the international Zionists from their infiltration of national governments, or we suffer the same fate as the common Russian farm-based populace did under the Jewish-led Red Army, the real holocaust, leading to the murder of 10’s of millions of innocent men, women, and children under the banner of furthering Jewish, communist interests.

Claiming Jewishness is not a race, it is not a religion, it is not a family. It is a protectionist cult of antichrist behavior incompatible with all other nations, just as the Bible lexicons and concordances clearly define it. The average Jew, according to polls, is an atheist, and so pretending that Jewishness or being and Israeli citizen is a religious action or friendly towards Christianity in any way is blatantly ridiculous, a Zionist lie. It requires ignorance, or better yet, a Zionist bent and influence over the education systems of the world. Just look at these Jewish headlines:

–=–

Israel Among the Least Religious Countries in the World

Only 30% of Israelis say they are religious, survey finds;
Thailand is most religious country in the world and China is the least…
with just 30 percent saying they are religious and 65 percent
saying they are either not religious or convinced atheists

Source: https://www.haaretz.com/israel-china-among-least-religious-nations-1.5350737

–=–

Why So Many Jews Are Atheists

Real cause of overwhelming Jewish atheistic tendencies seems to be
tragic ignorance of Judaism’s most profound teachings and ideas.

Source: https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3809043,00.html

–=–

Jewish Atheism And Jewish Theism: The Data And The Dilemma

American Judaism has a God problem.
Actually, and paradoxically, it seems to have two God problems.
One is Jewish atheism. The other is Jewish theism.

Source: https://www.judaismandscience.com/jewish-atheism-and-jewish-theism-the-data-and-the-dilemma/

–=–

You see, what hitler was warning these Jews about was not his intention to gas them into oblivion, but rather that it was and still is their very open and obvious antichrist behavior that purposefully and doctrinally goes against the Christian and Muslim founded nations, of which the international Jew was and still is pretending citizenship under. To be clear, the reason that Hitler and for that matter all other Christian-based Nations did not want the Jew to infiltrate and become a powerful player in their governments is the same exact reason that American congresses of the past vehemently refused freemasons and Mormons from becoming congressmen and presidents, including the family of Mitt Romney, because the members of these non-religious corporate structures, these societies and keepers of their own secrets, must take an oath to hold, protect, and benefit that cult over that of the nation they pretend to serve. What a Mormon or freemason (or duel-Israeli citizen) does is for the good of the brotherhood, not the nation, unless the goals of the brotherhood are the same as the nation, which of course become more similar the more masons or Mormons gain political power in the nation. It is no secret, and is in fact a common rhetorical statement, that what a Jew does in America is for Israel, not America, except when America’s goal is the protection, financial support, or furtherance of Israel and the Babylonian Mosaic, Noahide, antichrist law. This is not something that can be debated once a tiny bit of due diligence is accomplished.

I could go on here, listing the inordinate amount of both self-ascribed “Jews” and those related by blood to them in positions of power, as CEO’s of the worst corporations, as heads of media, banking, finance, and government, but you’ve no doubt heard it all before and have probably heard the Zionist lobbies deny these provable facts at every turn. To pretend American politics and business is not infiltrated by this brood is not even a conception worth mentioning here, except to say that only this institutionalized ignorance can cause it all to continue. This is not a race, nor a religion. It’s nothing more or less than a eugenic system of organized crime pretending to be the same ancient tribes of yesteryear. A modern Jew is and can only be what it is defined as in the Bible, the fallen Israelite, no longer bound to God or Its Law, and antichrist (opposed to the New Testament in every instance it fulfills and corrects the Old Testament Law of the Jews).

The point here is only to discredit the discreditors, to reveal the real infiltrators, and to delegitimize the very mythological tale of the Zionist Jew in Israel and internationally as anything historical or legitimate. You are vastly becoming worse than what you portray the Nazis as doing unto you. There are many religious yahoodim of today that refuse to be part of the legal fiction called secular Israel, be it religious Biblical objections or the cultural, moral rectitude they have by being citizens of those foreign countries. And even within Israel that orthodoxy that remains opposed to secular Israel’s crimes against humanity and irreconcilable differences from the Bible are labeled as “extremists” for their positions — atheist false “Jews” censoring other Jews.

And so Mr. Foxman of the ADL, you transparent fraud, though I can’t say that I look forward to your and your criminal organizations’ continued, clandestine censorship, blacklisting, and shadow-banning of my name and works, I can certainly send a big SCREW YOU by exposing you to the few that I can still reach through word of mouth and that still care to learn here on my little politically ousted and capsized platform today. Hell has a lovely place reserved for you and your defaming brood.

And to those calling themselves as Israelites and pretending Jew is the same word, wake the hell up. You are not acting as nor qualified to call yourselves by such a holy term as Hebrew or Israelite. You are merely the ignorant goyim of the legal (anti-God) state of Israel, same as any other nation ruled by those European royal families (tribes of the name/shem). Your legal (artificial) citizenship to a secular municipal corporation in the desert does not cause you to be magically transformed into an ancient, spiritual, God-fearing people that you have no relationship to in the first place, as you beat and steal the lands and property of those arabs that are actually “semite” by definition, and who have more in common with the actual bloodlines of the ancient Israelites than you ever will.

Try doing unto others as you’d have them do unto you, lest you find yourselves exactly as Hitler warned and as your grandparents found themselves, persecuted and without a homeland once again. After all, that is what you are doing to others today. You remain the Jewish problem, not the solution. May Karma, if it exists, bite you squarely upon the ass, or may you become true sons of God in order to overcome these Zionist parasites and therefore not be forced to reap the horrific spiritual and physical backlash you’ve sowed upon all others.

Peace out!

.

Clint richard-son (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
Sunday, September 15th, 2019

 

Your Child Is Retarded, Not Autistic, And Here’s Why


Yeah, yeah, before the brave new world order social justice hate speech newspeak fucknut manifests out from under your multiple personality syndrome-induced social media reeducated persona, I advise you to read the following information before succumbing to such manipulative media conditioning. Because the more you ignore the actual problem, the more retarded we all will become.

In researching for my upcoming documentary, I have come to understand that this is not only a war on our mind, body, and soul, but a battle of words.

I remember the time period, without recalling when or where it actually began, when the word “retarded” was systematically removed from the English language and labeled as some sort of hate speech or improper terminology to describe otherwise retarded people, especially kids. Anyone that grew up in my generation knew what that word meant and exactly who fell under that label. And while it was used as an insult like any other word for “normally” functioning kids as well, we understood the difference and weren’t afraid to use it. A rose by any other name is still a rose, it is said, and I dare say in this day and age that a retarded kid is still a retarded kid by any other name… including “autistic.”

Autism. The flowery term that nobody can quite define and which replaced the classics like retarded, deformed, handicapped, and harmed. Autism. How dare we call them anything else but by this non-binary term of normalization and non-hate. What idiots we truly are.

So I decided to ask the question, why? Why did retardation suddenly become a bad word, a hateful term? Why were we entrained and brainwashed into not using this perfectly descriptive term of nature to describe a condition that is obviously not in harmony with nature or normal functionality? Oh, sorry, am I not supposed to use the word normal now? Is it normality-challenged? Or is it that we are so unhealthy from diet, drugs, and vaccines that there is no comparatively normal state of health to utilize as a guidepost anymore?

Let’s cut to the chase…

A better question to answer is this: Who benefits? Who receives the advantage when a word like retarded is suddenly stripped from the proper verbiage and use of the common language. Most would answer with the classic excuse, to protect the children. Bullshit. If anything, this ignorance of the facts has caused more harm to children, as is evidenced in health statistics. So what about pharmaceutical companies? Legal, licensed drug pushers? You know, the ones that came up with the “ask your doctor if this poison is right for you” marketing strategy? In the end, what possible benefit could be had by removing the general term “retarded” and replacing it with quite specific, non-provable psychiatrical terms of art like “autism” and “Attention Deficit Disorder” and thousands of other mental or physical retardations by any other name?

Let me show you.

From the CDC.gov website for vaccine side effects, we read:

Possible Side-effects from Vaccines

Any vaccine can cause side effects. For the most part these are minor (for example, a sore arm or low-grade fever) and go away within a few days. Listed below are vaccines licensed in the United States and side effects that have been associated with each of them. This information is copied directly from CDC’s Vaccine Information Statements (VISs), which in turn are derived from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommendationsfor each vaccine.

Remember, vaccines are continually monitored for safety, and like any medication, vaccines can cause side effects. However, a decision not to immunize a child also involves risk and could put the child and others who come into contact with him or her at risk of contracting a potentially deadly disease.

What are the risks from DTaP vaccine?

    • Long-term seizures, coma, lowered consciousness, or permanent brain damage happen extremely rarely after DTaP vaccination.

As with any medicine, there is a very remote chance of a vaccine causing a severe allergic reaction, other serious injury, or death.

What are the risks from inactivated influenza vaccine?

    • There may be a small increased risk of Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) after inactivated flu vaccine…
    • Young children who get the flu shot along with pneumococcal vaccine (PCV13), and/or DTaP vaccine at the same time might be slightly more likely to have a seizure caused by fever. Ask your doctor for more information. Tell your doctor if a child who is getting flu vaccine has ever had a seizure.

As with any medicine, there is a very remote chance of a vaccine causing a serious injury or death.

What are the risks from MMR vaccine?

Moderate events:

      • Seizure (jerking or staring) often associated with fever
      • Temporary pain and stiffness in the joints, mostly in teenage or adult women
      • Temporary low platelet count, which can cause unusual bleeding or bruising
      • Rash all over body

Severe events occur very rarely:

      • Deafness
      • Long-term seizures, coma, or lowered consciousness
      • Brain damage

What are the risks from MMRV vaccine?

Moderate events:

      • Seizure (jerking or staring) often associated with fever
        • The risk of these seizures is higher after MMRV than after separate MMR and chickenpox vaccines when given as the first dose of the series. Your doctor can advise you about the appropriate vaccines for your child.
      • Temporary low platelet count, which can cause unusual bleeding or bruising
      • Infection of the lungs (pneumonia) or the brain and spinal cord coverings (encephalitis, meningitis)
      • Rash all over the body

If your child gets a rash after vaccination, it might be related to the varicella component of the vaccine. A child who has a rash after MMRV vaccination might be able to spread the varicella vaccine virus to an unprotected person. Even though this happens very rarely, children who develop a rash should stay away from people with weakened immune systems and unvaccinated infants until the rash goes away. Talk with your health care provider to learn more.

Severe events have very rarely been reported following MMR vaccination, and might also happen after MMRV. These include:

      • Deafness
      • Long-term seizures, coma, lowered consciousness
      • Brain damage

What are the risks from meningococcal vaccines?

As many as half of the people who get meningococcal ACWY vaccine have mild problems following vaccination, such as redness or soreness where the shot was given.

What are the risks from rabies vaccine?

A vaccine, like any medicine, is capable of causing serious problems, such as severe allergic reactions. The risk of a vaccine causing serious harm, or death, is extremely small. Serious problems from rabies vaccine are very rare.

Mild problems

      • soreness, redness, swelling, or itching where the shot was given (30% – 74%)
      • headache, nausea, abdominal pain, muscle aches, dizziness (5% – 40%)

Moderate problems

      • hives, pain in the joints, fever (about 6% of booster doses)

Other nervous system disorders, such as Guillain Barré syndrome (GBS), have been reported after rabies vaccine, but this happens so rarely that it is not known whether they are related to the vaccine.

NOTE: Several brands of rabies vaccine are available in the United States, and reactions may vary between brands. Your provider can give you more information about a particular brand.

What are the risks from rotavirus vaccine?

Serious problems following rotavirus vaccine:

      • Intussusception is a type of bowel blockage that is treated in a hospital, and could require surgery. It happens “naturally” in some babies every year in the United States, and usually there is no known reason for it.There is also a small risk of intussusception from rotavirus vaccination, usually within a week after the 1st or 2ndvaccine dose. This additional risk is estimated to range from about 1 in 20,000 to 1 in 100,000 US infants who get rotavirus vaccine. Your doctor can give you more information.

What are the risks from chickenpox vaccine?

More serious events following chickenpox vaccination are rare. They can include:

      • Seizure (jerking or staring) often associated with fever
      • Infection of the lungs (pneumonia) or the brain and spinal cord coverings (meningitis)
      • Rash all over the body

A person who develops a rash after chickenpox vaccination might be able to spread the varicella vaccine virus to an unprotected person. Even though this happens very rarely, anyone who gets a rash should stay away from people with weakened immune systems and unvaccinated infants until the rash goes away. Talk with your health care provider to learn more.

What are the risks from Yellow Fever vaccine?

Severe problems

      • Severe allergic reaction to a vaccine component (about 1 person in 55,000).
      • Severe nervous system reaction (about 1 person in 125,000).
      • Life-threatening severe illness with organ failure (about 1 person in 250,000). More than half the people who suffer this side effect die.

Source: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/side-effects.htm

–=–

Oh, I’m sorry, am I allowed to say the words brain damage, lowered consciousness, brain infection leading to encephalitis and meningitis, brain seizures causing blank staring, paralyzation, and all these other forms of RETARDATION of the brain and body? Or am I being politically incorrect, even though these are the exact medical terms of artful language used by the CDC, which is immune from such social justice hate speech bullshit?

Are you so dumbed-down and pacified that you will actually ignore such purposefully utilized terms and seek damages for a word not even acknowledged here, like autism?

What you will seldom if ever see is that a vaccine causes autism. General retardation? Yes, obviously so. Autism? No sir. All of these above listed “side effects” are very specific terms used to describe very specific and localized retardations of the human body and its symptoms. Autism is non-specific, not qualified, and therefore is not a side effect. Autism is a syndrome, not a specific disease. Autism is a creation of psychiatry, not medicine. If your child has autism, that means he or she has several side effects that have RETARDED his or her brain and other systems of the body. A syndrome necessarily connotes more than one condition or problem into some new age term that is pretended to be nice and fairy-like, where in the land of autism children can do amazing things and even hold steady jobs that require no critical thinking while riding magical unicorns and be free of that horrific Truth doctrine, where the state can take control and utilize that hoard of “special” people for various mundane tasks and call it gainful employment (use). In the novel Brave New World, these were the Deltas, or Gammas, the lo-level ordinaries that served only one purpose – to serve the Alphas and Betas.

Back in high school, I remember that this was the collective group of retarded kids that attended “special education” and rode the short bus. This was not an offensive term, merely a very accurate and even empathetic term used to describe their collective plight. In fact, the good kids like me often helped, volunteered to hang out and tutor, and often protected the retarded kids from the bullies and other sociopathic kids, you know, the ones that grew up to become today’s corporate CEOs, Doctors, Psychiatrists, and pharmaceutical makers and marketers. But today, we apparently cannot acknowledge the truth, that these kids were destroyed internally through vaccines and/or other drugs, so as to limit the liability of the drug-makers and their agents that all but run and make policy within the CDC and FDA.

Retardation is not a bad word. It’s ok to acknowledge the Truth, even in a world gone mad with institutionalized lies and socially restricted speech.

RETARD – verb transitive – [Latin retardo; re and tardo, to delay, tardus, slow, late. See Target.] 1. To diminish the velocity of motion; to hinder; to render more slow in progress; as, to retard the march of an army; to retard the motion of a ship. The resistance of air retards the velocity of a cannon ball. It is opposed to accelerate. 2. To delay; to put off; to render more late; as, to retard the attacks of old age; to retard a rupture between nations. My visit was retarded by business. – verb intransitive – To stay back. [Not in use.] (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

–=–

That’s right, to be retarded is to be held back, as in, from the rest of the class. But as the effect of a biological weapon like vaccines, this word retard describes exactly what has happened to a very large and infinitely growing minority of children today. In my generation and before, we didn’t call them retarded because of some deformity, but because their capacity to learn, to think, to perform, or to function was diminished. And despite the childish, immature rhetoric of school children, this term was one of neutrality used to properly identify and care for kids. The fact that you have been tricked into not using such an accurate, perfectly descriptive word is not helping your child in any way, but is rather a sign of your own retardation of common sense and saneness.

And guess what. Here we have the vaccine manufacturers and the CDC openly admitting that vaccines cause retardations due to brain damage and the like. But nowhere does it say autism. So why would you try and sue a company that openly admits it causes such physical and mental retardations by calling that rose by a different name, a name that they are adamantly opposed to being a side effect or symptom of its drugs, and where such nonsense is protected legal speech by government agencies? Why call it autism when they call it brain damage (retardation)?

This newspeak and willful ignorance is getting so bad that they are expanding the “spectrum” of autism to engulf and erase the names of many other disease states, even to the point of normalizing sociopathic, psychopathic, and non-empathetic behaviorisms.

–=–

Careful! According to this lady, everyone I know, including myself, is suffering from high-functioning autism in some way. Don’t like crowds of loud, drunken idiots? You must be high-functioning autistic. Have a problem with pointless, nervous small talk? You may be high-functioning autistic. Are you preoccupied with your daily routine? You may be a high-functioning autistic. Are you like me, someone that wants to learn everything about a subject before pretending to know everything about a subject? Well, you must be a rain-man, a high-functioning autistic. Want to move on to another subject after you fully learn another? You guessed it. You may be on the fucking spectrum. Want to correct someone that is full of shit? You must be high-functioning autistic. Hate pep rallies and shitloads of people acting socially unacceptable to you? Feel like you need to remove yourself from groups of people you don’t like and don’t want to associate with? Hate watching sports? Well then, you must be high-functioning autistic. Are you introverted? You are likely autistic, but high-functioning. Are you extroverted but intrusively social? You are also autistically high-functioning. Apparently, according to these psychiatric frauds, I’m the king of highness on the high-functioning autism spectrum. But then, who isn’t? I bet you are right there with me. How can anyone not be? The sociopath, perhaps, is immune, as one who can pretend to relate to anyone they choose while in actuality having no mental or spiritual connection at all to anyone, no moral Law or normally developed feelings to get in the way?

If that’s my choice, go ahead, call me autistic.

After all, normal is the new retarded at this point.

Or perhaps I’m just a high-functioning neuro-typical?

If everyone is autistic then nobody is, and we can all pretend to exist in the land of unicorns and imbibe in magical normality potions (psych drugs).

I heard the other day that games like Minecraft and Pokemon are designed by “aspies,” that is, men with Asperger’s Syndrome, now called as high-functioning autistics. This includes men like Microsoft’s Bill Gates and Apple’s Steve Jobs. Think about that for a moment — Bill Gates, the pioneer of innovative, sustainable, world-wide vaccine delivery to ALL CHILDREN around the globe.

As for the rest of her presentation, yes, vaccines and especially the metals used therein are a known cause of destroying the frontal lobe and mirror neuron functionality. But you’ll have to wait for the documentary for that, or actually look it up for yourself. But then, doing research yourself instead of trusting your doctor might make you a high-functioning autistic. In fact, according to the psychiatry field and its DSM, the term “neuro-typical” or having a non-retarded or normally functioning brain is being used to demonize anyone not autistic!

Let’s be clear. Cancer is not normal. Obesity is not normal. Diabetes is not normal. And autism is not normal. We should not treat any of these as if they are.

Remember, it is no measure of health to be well-adjusted to a profoundly sick society. Believe it or not, today this type of neuro-typical, absolutely reasonable and self-evident thought is now considered politically incorrect. And for someone like me, who has no desire to succeed or find wealth or status in this profoundly sick society, according to the world-view of the psychiatrist, I am a high-functioning autistic suffering from moral rectitude. Normality, that is, a man that has no brain damage and exists without retardation, is today considered as a psychiatric disease.

For more on the pusillanimous nature of banning not only words but the masculinity (power) behind words, check out my blog here: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2017/08/18/the-true-intent-behind-counter-cultural-gender-neutralization/

Do vaccines cause the actual symptoms behind the diagnosis of autism? Of course they do, and admittedly so. See my blog here: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2018/06/19/yes-vaccines-have-caused-sids-and-autism-must-read-and-share/

YOU AND YOUR CHILDREN ARE BEING RETARDED BY VACCINES AND DRUGS.

GROW THE FUCK UP AND GET OVER THE SOCIAL STIGMA.

STOP ACTING AS IF YOU ARE RETARDED AND DO THE RIGHT THING FOR YOUR CHILDREN.

STOP TREATING YOUR RETARDED CHILD AS IF “AUTISM” IS NORMAL. YOU SHOULD BE OUTRAGED! THIS IS WAR!

SPEAK FREELY AND PROPERLY, NOT ACCORDING TO SOCCER MOMS, THE PTA, AND MEDIA WHORES, BUT ACCORDING TO TRUTH AND IN PROPER LANGUAGE.

PSYCHIATRY IS LOW-FUNCTIONING AUTISM.

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS IS SPIRITUAL DEATH.

.

–Clint richard-son (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Friday, September 6th, 2019

 

 

 

Why Men Of Good Conscience Can Never Be Famous


The_Devil's_Contract

About 8 months ago, I was initially approached through email by a production company out of Texas to be on television. In my excitement, I of course told family and friends close to me without consideration of the events that would follow. It’s a horrible feeling to have to retract such statements of fact, that I would be interviewed for television. Oh, what a fool I can be…

They had seen my “alternative” interview on video games, how they’re made and their destructive effect on empathy and morality, and wanted to interview me on camera for a new “conspiracy” centric type of show. At first thought, I remember feeling cautiously excited, considering that the result of this exposure would at the very least have the positive effect of bringing readers and viewers and listeners to my various works. It was not by any means a paid gig, just an interview like any other of the over 1,000 I’d already done without any financial compensation, only this time it would be aired on television. My reward has always been the people I’ve touched, the extraordinary health of the children I’ve helped keep from disease-causing vaccines, and the various other comments and kudos I receive that keep me doing what I’m doing. Of course, there are plenty of detractors, contrarians, sophists, and the like, though they never seem to have much ground to stand on in the face of primary source material; no integrity.

I asked a few friends whether they thought this “appearance” was a good idea, that is, if I should trust such a Hollywood production considering the absolute shit that is on television already. The answer was generally no, I shouldn’t, with the exception of my always supportive immediate family. And on the surface, I agreed, especially after seeing first hand the hit pieces done to previous guests of mine in media. All around, involvement with that brood is just a bad idea. I should know, I worked amongst them for long enough to see it all for what it is. Yet circumstances led me to happen to be close to the L.A. area at the same time they would be, and they extended the invitation once more to meet up and conduct an on-camera interview.

I hesitantly agreed to meet, not knowing what would have been in store for me if some uncontrollable circumstances hadn’t intervened. They called and informed me that they couldn’t make the appointment. As fate would dictate, they had to cancel and again asked if we could do said interview on another date in the near future.

Some time went by, and there again appeared an email with a similar invitation, though I’d have to fly on my own dime to participate. Nice. I reconsidered the positive vs. the negative possibilities and, though erring on the side of caution, I again agreed to do the interview at some near, unset future date.

It was the next email link, however, that shone darkly in this strange chain of correspondences, and that’s what I’d really like to speak to you about today. For it was only then that they even mentioned and sent over to me any semblance or mention of a contract. And yes, as it turns out, my previous, seemingly unwarranted, paranoid fear and hesitation was immediately solidified into a well-justified validation of my former, precognitive, cautionary stance.

It is often said that those who appear on television and receive that delusion of fame are sell-outs, from stage actors to the music industry to the alternative radio sect. Of course, after receiving this horrific contract, I can definitely state that this perception couldn’t be more True. For when I read through that contract, I knew right then that I would be selling my soul if I took this interview. The violations of common, moral decency and privacy contained within this agreement juxtaposed with those that apparently have already signed it or something similar to appear on television (and you know who they are) should not be mistaken as good and conscionable men. And this fact can only be shown to you by reprinting that horrific contract here.

So why did I adamantly refuse with all my will, with my spiritually-driven mind, body, and soul to sign that devil’s contract?

Here, please read it for yourself and tell me what lengths you would go to for your own 30 seconds of artificially induced fame?

The names and corporations involved have been kept unedited so as not to protect the guilty:

–=–

APPEARANCE RELEASE 

For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, I hereby grant to Texas Crew Productions, LLC and its parents, subsidiaries, licensees, successors, designees, and assigns (collectively, “Producer”) the right to use my name, likeness, voice, conversation, sounds, biographical data and/or material, and editorial comments concerning me (collectively, my “Appearance”) in and in connection with the program tentatively entitled “STRANGE WORLD” (“Program”).

I agree that Producer shall have the right to create and capture audiovisual, audio-only, visual-only, and literary works, including the production of video and/or audio tapes, photographs, films, and/or recordings of and from my Appearance, including any performance of any musical composition(s) (the “Materials”) by any method of recording.

I agree that no payment shall be due to me for the use of my Appearance and/or the rights granted by me under this Agreement, and Producer shall not be obligated to pay me or any third party any compensation whatsoever, regardless of the time or method of any use of the Materials. 

I further acknowledge and agree that the consideration I will receive for Producer’s use of my Appearance and the exercise of the rights granted by me is the opportunity for publicity that I will receive if Producer decides to include the Materials in the Program. Producer is not obligated to use the Materials in the Program or for any other purpose whatsoever. Producer may assign its rights hereunder in Producer’s sole discretion. 

I agree that all results and proceeds of my Appearance and services hereunder (the “Results and Proceeds”) shall be deemed a work-made-for-hire specially ordered or commissioned by Producer for use as part of a motion picture or other audio-visual work pursuant to Section 201 of the United States Copyright Act of 1976, as amended.

Producer, or Producer’s agents and assigns, shall forever be the exclusive owner in all rights, including copyright, in the Materials and the Results and Proceeds of such Materials, and shall have the irrevocable right to use, and license others to use, the Materials in whole or in part, an unlimited number of times, in all languages, in all media whether now known or hereafter devised, anywhere in the universe in perpetuity in connection with all forms of exploitation, including without limitation, advertising, sale, promotion, marketing, merchandising, and distribution of the Program, other programs, or other products and/or services, including without limitation direct or indirect endorsements. 

Producer shall have the right to edit the Materials in any manner or form, and I waive any right to inspect or approve of any use of the Materials, including droit moral or moral rights, if any. 

Notwithstanding the foregoing, if and to the extent the Results and Proceeds are not deemed a “work-made-for-hire”, I hereby assign to Producer, in perpetuity and throughout the universe, in any and all manners, formats and medias, whether now known or hereafter devised, all right, title and interest (including, without limitation, all rights of copyright) in and to the Results and Proceeds. I waive the benefit of any provision known as “droit moral” or moral rights of authors or any similar or analogous law or decision in any country of the world. 

I acknowledge that Producer is relying on the representations, warranties and permissions granted herein, and my breach thereof would cause Producer irreparable injury and damage that cannot be reasonably or adequately compensated in an action at law. I hereby expressly agree that Producer shall be entitled to injunctive and other equitable relief to prevent and/or cure any breach or threatened breach of this Agreement by me.

I further acknowledge that Producer is relying on the permissions granted herein to the degree described above and hereby agree not to assert any claim of any nature whatsoever (including any claims for injunctive relief and/or money damages) against anyone relating to the exercise of the permissions and rights granted hereunder. I expressly waive any and all moral rights I may have in connection with the Materials and/or my Appearance. I also waive any claim or action for defamation against Producer and/or any claim that the Materials are, or may be claimed to be, defamatory, untrue or censorable in nature. I waive any right to injunctive relief and agree that I will not in any event be entitled to prevent or inhibit the exhibition, distribution, use or exploitation of the Materials, the Program and/or my Appearance therein. I waive any right to terminate or rescind this agreement. The termination of this Agreement, for any reason, shall not affect Producer’s rights in the Results and Proceeds of the taping, filming and photography, the Materials or my Appearance. This paragraph shall survive the termination or the expiration of this Agreement. 

I agree to release, defend, indemnify and hold Producer and the exhibiting network and their respective affiliates, successors and assigns, and the officers, directors, employees, agents and representatives thereof (collectively, the “Producer Parties”), harmless from any and all claims, demands, costs (including attorneys’ fees) and causes of action of any kind or nature whatsoever now and in the future, including, without limitation, defamation, bodily harm, infliction of emotional distress and invasion of privacy, property damage, rights of publicity, commercial disparagement, and/or infringement of any other proprietary and/or personal rights arising out of or in connection with my Appearance, statements and/or actions in or creation of the Materials and/or the Program.

I acknowledge that there is a possibility that subsequent to the execution of this Agreement, I may discover facts or incur or suffer claims which were unknown or unsuspected at the time this Agreement was executed, and which if known by me at that time may have materially affected my decision to execute this Agreement. I acknowledge and agree that by reason of this Agreement, and the releases contained in the preceding paragraphs, I am assuming any risk of such unknown facts and such unknown and unsuspected claims. 

Additionally, I acknowledge awareness of and hereby waive any rights and benefits afforded by California Civil Code Section 1542, which provides: A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS WHICH THE CREDITOR DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS OR HER FAVOR AT THE TIME OF EXECUTING THE RELEASE, WHICH IF KNOWN BY HIM OR HER MUST HAVE MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR.

I represent and warrant that: (i) I have the full power and right to make and perform this agreement and the consent of no other person or entity is necessary to grant the rights hereunder; (ii) I have not given or agreed to give any member of the production staff or anyone associated in any manner with the Program or any representative of Producer anything of value to arrange my appearance in the Program or the advertisements therefor; and (iii) any statements made by me during my Appearance are true to the best of my knowledge, and neither they nor my Appearance will violate or infringe upon the rights of Producer or any third party.

I acknowledge and agree that (i) this is a non-union agreement and that my participation and Appearance hereunder shall not be subject to the terms of any collective bargaining agreement; and (ii) Producer is not a signatory to any collective bargaining agreement covering my participation and Appearance hereunder.

I acknowledge that in connection with my participation in the Program, confidential and/or proprietary information of Producer and/or the Program (“Confidential Information“) may be revealed to me. Such Confidential Information shall include, without limitation, information regarding the Program’s concept, format and/or ideas, the participant selection process, identities of participants, challenges and/or activities that may be included in the Program, locations of the Program, the content and final outcome of the Program or of any episode, and any other confidential and/or proprietary information relating to the Program and/or any of the Producer Parties. In consideration of the opportunity to participate in the Program, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, and as a material inducement to Producer to invite me to participate in the Program, I expressly agree that I shall not, directly or indirectly, verbally or otherwise, at any time (whether or not I ultimately appear in the Program), publish, reveal, disseminate, disclose, or cause to be published, revealed, disseminated or disclosed (herein “Disclosure“) any Confidential Information to any person, firm or entity whatsoever (herein “Third Parties“) nor shall I issue any press release or public statement relating to the Program, Producer, my Appearance or this Agreement without Producer’s prior written consent.

If any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this agreement, or the breach of any term hereof, cannot be settled through direct discussions, the parties agree to endeavor to first settle the controversy or claim by mediation conducted in Angeles County, State of California, and administered by JAMS under its applicable rules. If a dispute is not otherwise resolved through direct discussions or mediation, the controversy or claim, including the scope or applicability of this agreement to arbitrate, shall be resolved by binding confidential arbitration conducted in Los Angeles County, State of California, and administered by JAMS in accordance with the Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures of JAMS or subsequent versions thereof, including the optional appeal procedure and including, without limitation, the rule providing that each party shall pay pro rata its share of JAMS fees and expenses, and the rules providing for limited discovery and other exchange of information. The JAMS Rules for selection of an arbitrator shall be followed, except that the arbitrator shall be an experienced entertainment law arbitrator licensed to practice law in California or a retired judge. I agree that any dispute resolution proceedings will be conducted only on an individual basis and not in a class, consolidated or representative action. Notwithstanding the above requirements, if a party files suit in court or files an arbitration before first seeking to mediate, in direct violation of this paragraph, the other party does not have to request mediation to enforce the right to compel arbitration as required under this paragraph. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing in this Agreement or in any of the applicable rules of JAMS shall prevent Producer from seeking provisional relief outside of arbitration (without posting any bond) for any breach or threatened breach by me of this agreement, including, without limitation, equitable and/or injunctive relief. 

This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California, regardless of the place of its physical execution and shall be binding on me and my successors, parents, licensees, legal representatives, heirs, and assigns (as applicable). I shall not raise, and hereby waive, any defenses based upon improper venue, inconvenience of the forum, lack of personal jurisdiction, or the sufficiency of service of process.

Initial ________ 

AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED

–=–

Talk about the devils contract!

To be clear, I refused this in triplicate, sending a return email with all of my objections for the record, which if you know me and my work, should be obvious. Amazingly, I did so because the employee that received my absolute denial and condemnation of this contract sent me the following reply:

Viviana Galvis <viviana@texascrew.com>
Fri 4/5/2019 11:38 AM
  • Clint;
  • Allison Jones <allison@texascrew.com>

Dear Clint,

I’ve been discussing with the producers about this matter and we are willing to hear your thoughts or concerns in the release and work around a template (contract) that will be suitable for both parts.
We are not a Hollywood production, our production company is providing content for the Travel Channel, however, as the Travel Channel has acquired Discovery, they usually require a license like this one, that allows the production to use your image without any problems, like stopping the production etc.
Your intellectual rights are still yours and those are not transferable, but as you will be sharing ideas, and ideas have no copyright, we want to make sure that you will be comfortable by sharing your ideas with us on camera.
Trust me, I’m Colombian and have worked in some productions with a lot of legalese back and forth and some of this results overwhelming for people that doesn’t understand about the requirements from some American networks. Fortunately, you know the language, you have experience in the tv industry and maybe with some corrections, we can all be happy.
Let me know your thoughts, we’d be happy to offer solutions,
Viviana Galvis

–=–

Needless to say, the response I sent back rebuking the evil shit-pile that was this contract was not approved by the shyster entertainment attorneys that work for that conglomerate media corporation. In fact, I’ve never even heard a response back to my returned discourse. I gave them 5 months. Nothing. Screw em’.

But the takeaway, that is, what I really want you to know here today is two-fold. Firstly, that I always have and promise I will continue to hold my own inherent rights, integrity, and moral rectitude and standards above any “consideration” of fame and fortune (or lack thereof) promised by these corporate devils (attorneys). And secondly, you need to know that those who do sell out to these devils simply cannot be trusted, because trust is not an option. Choice is not an option, once the choice is made to give up choice. Their agreement to such terms is proof positive of a lack of integrity, and whatever is leftover is killed by contractual obligation. Their appearances on these predictive programing reality and conspiracy television shows confirms their willingness to sell out, their inherent vice, for they would not be on television without such contractual waivers being agreed to and signed. I am living proof of that fact.

You may take this for what it’s worth, choosing to ignore it or to take it to heart. There are no exceptions. This includes all news anchors, all entertainers, all talkshow hosts, all guests, all mainstream, syndicated radio hosts, and anyone playing a character in that Hollywood witchcraft of false show. I have never been asked to sign a contract in all this time until now, until getting close to that evil that is the interconnected Hollywood mainstream. Stop placing your faith in that vile cesspool.

I can show you this contract for one and only one reason, and this fact proves that I didn’t sign it or agree in any way to it. I chose not to give up any so-called rights to speak of their evil intentions. How many do you really think can say that? Even section 501 corporate churches (religions) are refrained from speaking up in political matters, because of similar contractual considerations with government and an artificial “non-profit” status. I will not allow my hands or my God-given (inherent), Natural rights to be tied by the signature of any legal persona.

As for my presence out here, I can only watch from afar, in my apparently self-induced obscurity, looking on as my false heroes die one at a time, watching them fall like dead ducks as they cross over into the “entertainment only” abyss. But at least I can watch with my own integrity intact. And maybe that’s enough.

But I gotta tell you, it’s sure starting to feel like an empty, lonely place out here.

.

–Clint richard-son (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Friday, August 30th, 2019

How To Use Religious Exemption Against Vaccination


I recently received yet another emailed inquiry regarding the three possible “exemptions” for vaccines. Probably more than any other subject this particular question rears its ugly head, and usually they reference religious exemption more than not. Now, I keep telling people not to ask me questions or listen to me if you don’t want the total, harsh reality that is the Truth, but they seem to want to be disappointed and disillusioned anyway. And so today I’m going to tell you that desire the Truth exactly how you can use religion as your sword against vaccination for you and your children.

First, though, let’s treat the other exemptions, those being medical excuse and conscientious objection.

Beginning with medical exemption, this particular legal exemption is a catch 22. In order to exempt yourself from a medical act, such as vaccination, you need a medical doctor’s letter. See the problem here? While in reason and truth any free-willed, neutral, educated medical doctor (an oxymoron) would exempt all his or her patients from the horrors of vaccination, the term “medical doctor” (MD) is not a real thing. It’s a flattering, legal title granted only to those willing to not act upon their conscience, and therefore possess and active ignorance and willingness to ignore actual science that shows the absolute ludicracy that is vaccination and the health epidemic it has caused. All that aside, the most important factor to understand for why this exemption is useless and revokable is because it is not an inherent right of any man. It is specifically a legal, man-made exemption that has nothing to do with God-given (Natural), inherent rights. All medical exemptions are powered by government permission to do so only, and the corporations that most doctors work for are known to fire without prejudice any nurse or doctor that either refuses vaccines for themselves or speaks publicly about the dangers of vaccines. In the near future, you will not find any doctor that will be willing to risk his or her career or funding just so you can protect yourself and your children from such dastardly pharmaceutical poisons. Because everyone in the world is technically qualified for a medical exemption when the actual research and studies are understood, it’s kind of like giving everyone in the world $1 million dollars: nothing would actually change, and in a few years most common people will have lost it anyway to the various schemes designed to legally steal it, such as medical billing, the #1 reason for bankruptcy in the United States. If everyone is exempt, then no-one is. This will make more sense as we continue…

The second exemption is conscientious objection. This one is about as realistic as it was in the draft for the Vietnam War. If a right is revokable, then again it’s not a Natural, inherent Right. If a right can be taken away, then it was never yours in the first place. And unfortunately, this applies to all three exemptions we are covering here. But more to the point, there is no real place for conscious objection in a legal system. The legal, civil law is strict. It is not up for contention. Follow it or be punished. Choice is an illusion when under the Roman (strict) matrix of legal law. Moral and conscientious thoughts are certainly allowed, but acting on them is a thought crime. It’s terrorism at best. If this wasn’t true, then government would fall tomorrow due to conscientious objections to its immoral policy of controlled chaos and madness. So the conscientious objection fallacy, while hopeful in its promise, is really just a cosmic joke. Just ask those who objected to the Vietnam War. You might need to go to Canada for that though… or visit them in prison.

To put this another way, we must understand that corporations, that is, legal persons, including individual citizenships of the United States, were invented in Roman times to be strictly exempt from moral and conscious responsibilities and actions. Corporations (persons) are designed by men to remove men from God’s Realm, from Nature, and therefore to pretend a legal (artificial) shelter from the moral Law, and equally from spiritual consciousness. The point is this: conscientious thought requires a spiritually and morally conscious man that acts by choice. This is impossible under and in the matrix of legal code. For there is no conscious in legal persons, places, or things. There is nothing. Emptiness. A void of anything Real, of anything Natural, of anything Created by God. Without choice, there can be no moral action. The legal law eliminates choice, leaving no ability to follow any alternative, moral path, and generally causes men to act against their religious, moral foundation. This is indeed the specific purpose of the legal system and the person-hood, the elimination of the need of men to choose at all times what Nature and Its Law requires. The legal law unbalances the scale, taking away the ability to spiritually measure right and wrong. A person that has no conscious cannot claim conscientious objection, for a legal person is property of the legal system, and like a video game character, is only allowed to exist by the rules of the legal game system and its masters (false gods). A pawn is ultimately moved by its master, headlong into oblivion, having no real choice except to go forward on the legal game board. No is not an option, and pawns have no exemptions or free will from their controllers. Real choice is simply not in the artificial code that makes up a legal person. A person is a construct of legal law. It has no conscious of its own. And the man that acts in legal person therefore surrenders any right to act on his or her own conscious, instead obeying strictly and under sanction the legal law of men without question, that is, without the right to act conscientiously.

And that leads us to the third legal exemption, that being a “religious” one. In this particular exemption we find a hint of the only True choice respected by government, the religious law. Sure, a medical exemption is respected, but doctors are agents of government, so once government removes the artificial, temporary right of doctors to exempt a patient and keep their jobs, then that exemption will be gone as well, as moral choice by the man acting as a “doctor” of government will no longer be an option. The difference between the medical and conscientious objection vs. the religious exemption is very simply that the legal law is in every case trumped by actual religious law.

The religious exemption, therefore, would seem to be the all powerful weapon to end all battles, right?

Wrong. And here’s why…

If you’ve ever seen a movie where the hero attempts to ward off evil spirits with a cross or crucifix, say in vampire movies or the fantastical films about Catholic priests committing exorcisms, you always find a recurring theme. They all say and warn the same thing: you have to have faith for that to work. In other words, to hold up an idol of anything and pretend that you have the power that that idol represents is what is called hypocrisy. If you want to harm a vampire or demon with a cross, then it is the power of God that does it, not some trinket made by the hands of men. But when actual religious faith comes into the soul bearing that idol, suddenly the power of God is behind it, and the mere idol turns into a weapon of unimaginable proportions.

This is, of course, merely the fiction of Hollywood. Or is it? Is there actually a moral lesson to learn from these fantasies? Can this concept be applied to the subject at hand, that is, vaccination exemption?

Absolutely. In fact, we can use it as a very understandable metaphor.

Let us pretend that the idol in these ridiculous Hollywood stories, the cross, is what we are holding up as our own figurative weapon of legal “religious exemption.” Can a self-proclaimed “atheist” possibly use religious exemption without believing in the very Source of that weapon? The answer in Reality, of course, is no. But the legal realm is not Reality, and so yes, strangely enough an atheist can use a legally invented idol called as religious exemption. In other words, the atheist can openly commit hypocrisy against his own false belief system, and the legal system is happy to protect that right of hypocrisy… until, that is, the governmental body of that legal system is ready to retract it. And that’s where most of us find ourselves today, watching helplessly as the administrators of the persons (property) of the legal matrix change its programming code to legally reflect that religious exemption is no longer an idol that is acceptable to be used.

But how can it do that?

Simple. These legal exemptions never existed in Reality in the first place for any man. Legalism is fiction. Legal law is fiction. And so any exemption that comes from a legal government (artificial person) was born and will die in fiction. And any religious claim you may make as a legal, artificial, fictional person dies with it.

You see, the whole time you’ve been that hero (actor) trying to use an idol that has nothing to do with what that symbol’s actual Source is. To use a True religious right, a man (male or female) must act as a religions man. Persons (legal fictions) cannot be religious nor act under the Higher religious law, because persons aren’t of Nature. They aren’t Real. They are not Creations of God. Thus, the vampiric demons of government, that is, attorneys in black moo-moos acting as false gods (magistrates/judges) have no revulsion to your false idol of religious exemption. You’ve gotta have faith for that to work…

Please watch these for your understanding, they are placed here by me for a purpose.

–=–

Idolatry: the TV actor, Vincent, before True faith:

And the God-fearing man Vincent after True faith:

–=–

The cross only represents the Law of God (Jesus Christ/Logos), but without faith, the Law of God is a useless idol in any form. Without following the Law, It has no power to protect you, and as a weapon it’s pointless. It’s just an idol for sinners pretending to worship God through Jesus Christ (Law). Might as well hold up a kitten without claws.

Keep in mind this is metaphoric, and that its meaning applies to defeating all things that are “evil” in the Bible, which essentially is anything man-made, including the legal matrix code. The vampire (attorney) must corrupt your blood in order to control you. The fangs of the vampire are the words of a legal contract. And personhood is to be bound under the spell (spelling of words) of the master of that contract, causing the agentic relationship of master and servant (volunteerism). The Law of God (Nature), represented by the symbol of the cross here, is that which defeats the vampire (attorney). The word of Truth (God) destroys the words of legal demons. The cross represents the implementation of moral choice. The vampires of government have no control over you unless you accept their initial, original sin, the corruption of blood (attainder) that places artificial status upon you in their own, invented society.

And this depiction of false faith in a false idol of god describes just about every “Christian” in the United States, and for that matter, the world. Legal religions (corporations) are institutionalized idolatry, causing men to attempt in vein to worship God while doing so in legal, fictional persona (mask), to bear the protection of God and Its Law while not following that law themselves, as if It is external from them. And this is why the Christian “church” has no power religiously or politically. A section 501 corporation is designed to take away religious rights and exemptions, not bestow them. Only a fool can possibly believe that God-given rights can be given by a legal corporation under the IRS code of government. Only a brainwashed man can be made to believe a corporation (artificial person) has anything to do with the Source of Nature and Its Law. Only a idolator can call himself a “Christian” while following the legal, antichrist, anti-God law of man. Only a slave cannot differentiate between the God of Nature and the false gods of legal government. For the actual, True church of the Bible is only a free and moral, private People, that is, men following the Law of God (Nature), which absolutely excludes and despises all legal code. But in legalism, the “church” is a legal term of art meaning a corporation, an artificial person in law, and has nothing to do with men. In other words, legally established religions are not in any way part of God’s Realm or Law. They are a legal simulation of the Real, and so are its members. Corporate religions bound completely under legal government is like a bug trap for men, burning our wings so that we cannot fly away, keeping us locked into the legal (anti-God) system of law even while allowing us to pretend in idolatry through flattering title (without True faith) that we are followers of the Law of the Bible, of the example of Jesus Christ. Worst of all, this is all warned about in the Bible, which calls us foolish hypocrites as the figurative dumb asses.

But here’s the kicker. Men are hypocrites toward the Law of God (Nature) in the Real world. But in the legal matrix, persons are simulators. Simulation and hypocrisy are the same term. Therefore, to act in legal persona (mask) under legal (anti-God) law in the legal simulation while at the same time pretending to be a True “Christian” equals the metaphor of being plugged into the matrix (lie) with or without contemplation of ones actual hypocrisy as a man. The “Christian” flattering title is merely ones “projected self-image” while trapped inside the legal matrix code. It’s idolatry. Simulation. But in Nature, from God’s perspective, if you will, simulation equals hypocrisy, two different words that mean the same thing in the two different realms.

It’s also called apostasy, and it’s the foundational purpose of corporate Christianity. It’s the opposite of being an apostle:

APOSTASY – In English law. The total renunciation of Christianity, by embracing either a false religion or no religion at all. This offense can only take place in such as have once professed the Christian religion. (–Black’s Law 2nd Edition)

APOSTASY – noun – [Gr. a defection, to depart.1. An abandonment of what one has professed; a total desertion, or departure from one’s faith or religion. 2. The desertion from a party to which one has adhered… (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

APOSTATE – adjective – False; traitorous. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

HYPOCRITE – noun – 1. One who feigns to be what he is not; one who has the form of godliness without the power, or who assumes an appearance of piety and virtue, when he is destitute of true religion. And the hypocrite’s hope shall perish. Job 8:12. A dissembler; one who assumes a false appearance. Fair hypocrite you seek to cheat in vain. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

–=–

I go to church every Sunday (according to the legal Roman calendar, the Pope, and its legal system of secular law) and on legal holidays (which are not actually Holy Days) and therefore I’m a “Christian.” Time to call bullshit on that logical fallacy, isn’t it? It’s more like this: I don’t follow the Law of God by the example of the Christ allegory and instead have idolized the corporate churches false image of Jesus Christ as if Christ is God, and so I call myself as the Romans did, as a “Christian,” despite my membership to an apostate, corporate religion that makes its own doctrine and misleads me at every turn in simulation.

So how can you use religious exemption in the legal system? You can’t, dumb ass.

You’ve got to have faith for that to work. 

But the legal system and its public institutions have caused you to not even know what faith is! And so here is where I will tell you how to religiously bypass any legal law that requires persons to vaccinate.

Ready?

Stop acting in legal person (artificial, legal status).

Stop taking benefits from the demons and vampires of legal (anti-God) governments, which require you to voluntarily act in legal person.

Stop being an idolator.

Stop believing you have inherent, Natural, God-given rights when you sold them long ago to become a legal citizenship and as you continue to simulate the part.

Stop believing the foolish notion that God’s (religious) Law can save you when you don’t have True religion and faith as your sword (reason) and shield (protection).

Lastly, we must understand just what an exemption is and why it doesn’t and cannot exist for men of God.

EXEMPTION – 1. Freedom from any service, charge, burden, tax, evil, or requisition, to which others are subject; immunity; privilege. Many cities of Europe purchased or obtained exemptions from feudal servitude. No man can claim an exemption from pain, sorrow or death. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of Law)

EXEMPTION – Freedom from a general duty or service; immunity from a general burden, tax, or charge. A privilege allowed by law to a judgment debtor, by which he may hold property to a certain amount, or certain classes of property, free from all liability to levy and sale on execution or attachment. (–Black’s Law 2nd edition)

–=–

Why are these exacting definitions important to comprehend?

This is key. To have an exemption from vaccination means one and only one thing — vaccines are already a requirement. In other words, the government considers it your duty as its citizen (subject to its legal law) to be vaccinated. The exemption is a temporary, revokable “freedom” from that duty, a permission to avoid that requirement of law. Vaccines are already required of persons (property), which are performance debt-slaves of government. If you claim exemption, you are actually acknowledging and respecting the false legal law and its gods by getting their permission to have freedom from it. Remember, in legalese, freedom is defined as franchise. It’s not True freedom under God to self-govern, but rather an artificial freedom bestowed temporarily to the fictional person that you currently respect and utilize as a status in legal society. Remember, all man-made things are temporary. Therefore, if the person is required to be vaccinated, then you as surety in bond of that person must obey in order to retain that franchise (legal freedom), in order to continue using that person (legal status). Those who refuse the legal law and end up punished, fined, or imprisoned for their illegal behavior (while acting in legal persona) have broken the rules of their franchise (citizenship). People in jail also have freedom (franchise) when they are on good behavior. Same thing, different prison. In the open-air debtor’s prison of the nation, citizens (prisoners, as public, non self-governing wards of the state) are given certain exemptions in their franchise, meaning they have certain artificially induced freedoms allowed to them by permission, licensure, permit, etc. Only a fool would believe those rights and freedoms are God-given, Natural rights.

Inversely, we can understand our Duty to God (Nature), including ones requirement of following God’s Law of Nature by the example of Jesus Christ (Logos personified), which in itself requires no respect of lies, fictions, persons, status, titles, false gods (magistrates), or anything else artificially placed over Nature (Truth) in a simulation of the Real. Again, there is simply no exemption from God’s Law. With any God-given, inherent right comes an equal duty to all other men. Lies are not exempt from Truth, they are diametrically opposed to Truth. And so it’s important to understand that legalism, that is citizenship under the nation, is specifically designed to fictionally exempt man from his Duty to God, to Nature, and that includes ones Duty to all other men. As this is in Reality impossible, the legal system depends on its ability to cloud and obscure any relation we may have to Nature and Its Law, offering the protection of the legal law and the false sense of forgiveness offered by the false “Christian” corporate church that is also under legal law, not God’s. To defeat God (Nature), the state simply replaced God with a fictional, corporate entity (idol) of its own invention, and then called it legally as religion.

RELIGIOUS – When religious books or reading are spoken of, those which tend to promote the religion taught by the Christian dispensation must be considered as referred to, unless the meaning is so limited by associated words or circumstances as to show that the speaker or writer had reference to some other mode of worship. (–Black’s Law 2nd Edition)

–=–

In American law as a “Christian country” (referring to the free and private People of the States, not the United States legalist corporation as an open-air prison for publicly held-in-persona debt-slaves), the Bible is considered as the meaning of the term “religious” unless that word “religious” is intentionally twisted by the legal language to mean its opposite. Get it? In the United States district corporation, the word religious is a crime, but certain religious exemptions are allowed.

Allow me to quote my book, Strawman Volume 1, where True religion (action) of men and the legal franchise of limited, legal religious belief without practice (action) of US citizenships (persons) is differentiated:

–=–

Begin excerpt:

This is one of the most important lessons in this work. Please ensure full comprehension between these two very different “freedoms” before you proceed with this work. For as a citizenship of the United States, the attachment to your strawman as property under the law of persons only allows you to fall under the “freedom of religion” as a limited legal outlet of commercial franchise. In other words, “Religious Freedom” is against the law of the United States for its subjects (persons).

RELIGIOUS FREEDOMWithin constitution embraces not only the right to worship God according to the dictates of one’s conscience, but also the right to do, or forbear to do, any act, for conscience sake, the doing or forbearing of which is not inimical to the peace, good order, and morals of society. (Black4)

FREEDOM OF RELIGION – Embraces the concept of freedom to believe and freedom to act, the first of which (belief) is absolute, but the second of which (action) remains subject to regulation for protection of society. (Black4)

—=—

Now you tell me, what good is religious, moral belief if you are not allowed to act on it? To be clear, this state of confusion at bar is the very purpose of nations, to prevent self-governing, moral standing in men. For no moral man would allow a nation as this to continue in its abhorrent actions against God (Nature) and man. But the moral man is cowed and pacified by his surety to the law of his persona (false identity). We are so smitten and proud of our nationality, our personality in public that we don’t dare risk doing what is right in and under the Law of God. This is unmistakably and self-evidently the work of the devil (the attorney class) and his scribes.

These are completely separate definitions, on separate pages of the dictionary. They are not the same thing. As citizenships of the United States, you better damn well know the difference before proceeding herein, and before you try and act morally in a society that strictly forbids moral actions without license from the state.

Freedom of moral thought, but not freedom to act upon that conscious moral thought… This is what public, legal freedom (franchise) is when defined by the commercial gods — a legal corp-oration called government. It is not freedom of religion, but franchise of religion. These are as the rules set for employees (agents) by their employer (principal). This is not Natural freedom under God, which is described above as Religious Freedom. This is tyranny named (noun) as “freedom,” where the ability to practice religion is confounded and limited to the franchise it belongs to (of), as freedom (franchise) of (belonging to) religion (memberships to legal corporations, as the legal, anti-God definition of religion). In the United States, the lack of a moral standing in God’s Law (religious, spiritual Life) is the official state religion, as an enforced, amoral lack of It. Freedom is only a franchise allowed to fictional persons. Governments cannot control in totality your thought processes, only your actions (anti-pro-verb) while in its property. Specifically, we must recognize absolutely that the purpose of the legal law is to prevent man from acting upon his moral thoughts and beliefs. 

—=—

“No one is punished for his thoughts. 

—COGITATIONIS PAENAM NEMO PATITUR. Dig. 48, 19,18. (Black4)

—=—

It’s impossible to have religious freedom in any nation where churches are licensed to the government.

—Congressman George Hansen, quoted from “In Caesar’s Grip,” by Peter Kershaw

—=—

“The framers of our Constitution meant we were to have freedom of religion, not freedom from religion.

—Billy Graham

—=—

The legal realm acknowledges only written and spoken words. It is immune, so to speak, from religious and moral (unwritten) controls, as legalism and religious action are foreign to each other. Man is only punished for his actions, and when his actions are in the person of another, he is not acting according to his own moral thoughts of Law.

By providing the fictional, legally “natural” person (strawman) with an insurance bond for a man’s operation in that fictional, commercial realm, government ensures that each individual man will act collectively according to civil law and not according to his own religious and moral thoughts. This is the separation of mind from the body, the killing of the spirit (soul). For the law is attached to the person, and thus the man in the fictional chains of surety to that person is bound by the public law of persons. By acceptation of that person as a commercial vessel (a citizen-ship) in surety, man tacitly agrees and consents (through assent) to abide by the legal law in direct opposition to God’s Law while acting in that fictional persona. He literally agrees to use his Real body as insurance to ensure that he will operate in fiction (evil) according to strictly written law, and if he does not, the man in surety will be judged and punished for the incorrect use of that corporate strawman (property of government). Thus the man’s moral mind does not control his Self (his body), for the law of persons controls his mind and therefore his actions, where the legal persona acts as the surrogate or second self. This is a lack of True Self-respect.

—=—

“No man can enter into a strong man’s house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strong man (through legal personhood); and then he will spoil his house.”

“Or else how can one enter into a strong man’s house, and spoil his goods, except he first bind the strong man? (through legal personhood) and then he will spoil his house.”

—Matthew 12: 29, Mark 3: 27, KJB (added by author for this excerpt)

—=—

“My son, if thou be surety for thy friend, if thou hast stricken thy hand with a stranger, Thou art snared with the words of thy mouth, thou art taken with the words of thy mouth.

“Go to the ant, thou sluggard; consider her ways, and be wise: Which having no guide, overseer, or ruler, Provideth her meat in the summer, and gathereth her food in the harvest.”

—Proverbs 6: 1-2 and 6-8, KJB

—=—

This is the purpose and pretext of legal surety: insurance that the instigation of person-hood at birth into the nation will incite man’s actions to be in concordance with the legal law as opposed to being in respect of God’s Law and Nature. Incitement to evil acts without moral compass (direction). This is a binding relationship to fictional rulers under contractual terms (word magic), even by the shaking (striking) of hands. For a man’s feet never touch land while he sails his ship upon the virtual sea of that surety (security) of legal commercial fiction. The legal jurisdiction is an invisible, fictional barrier set upon Creation and its Law; a prophylactic barring man from his very own essence as part of that Oneness of Nature.

A fictional person simply cannot follow God’s Law, without exception, for a person is not a Creation of God. God bestows no status upon man but self-evidence. This untouchable essence of negativity towards any of man’s systems of positive law can never be taken away, though obviously we have been fooled into contractually selling those God-given attributes in exchange for fictional non-sense. A man acting in person is subject only to man’s utilitarian legal law of persons (status/condition), with strict prohibitions against God that we call as the doctrine of “freedom of religion.” Opposites attract. A man in public personhood does not need and is not expected to think in any way that is responsible or compos mentis, for the person is allowed only to follow man’s (its master’s) strict legal law when used by its autonomic user.

—=—

“This word ‘person’ and its scope and bearing in the law, involving, as it does, legal fictions and also apparently [IN APPEARANCE ONLY] natural beings, it is difficult to understand; but it is absolutely necessary to grasp, at whatever cost, a true and proper understanding to the word in all the phases of its proper use. A person is here not a physical or individual person, but the status or condition with which he is invested. Not an individual or physical person, but the status, condition or character borne (carried) by physical persons. 

The law of persons is the law of status or condition.

—American Law and Procedure, Vol. 13, page 137, 1910

—=—

End Excerpt.

–=–

The Law of God is just as strict as the legal law. It is impossible to Obey the Law of Nature while also obeying the legal law that is designed to be opposed to God’s Law in every way. Claiming anything from religious Law while in personhood under legal, civil law is at best foolishness and at worst insanity. And worshiping God while acting in legal persona is like holding up a cross in idolatry without faith. It will never actually happen.

Religious exemption is a lie, just like any other exemption. It only exists in the legal realm, nowhere else. And in Truth, if you qualify for any type of legal exemption, then you have already fallen into the legal trap. There is no exemption from Reality. There is no exemption from God’s Law. There is only choice, free will, and you must choose which Law to follow.

Exemption, to be clear, is a post-requisite. One can only be exempt from legal law because of whatever legal status one already obtained that allows for exemption. But in the end, a debt-slave is really exempt from nothing, for all legal exemptions can be revoked by the false god that bestowed that artificial, legal right in the first place. The exemption never existed in Reality, being a non-inherent, unnatural right to man, and so it has no religious Law protection. God protects no man that claims exemption from anything, because to claim exemption one must already claim to be agent for a legal entity. Only persons can claim exemption, not men.

A religious man in the True sense needs no exemption. He just says no. Exemption implies that some higher power exists and that the man is pretending to be under that power and authority instead of that of Nature’s Law. You don’t need exemption if you are not under the legal law of the false gods of government. It’s this Higher consciousness that is voided through legal, religious and conscientious exemption. That is, to claim legal exemption one must already be accustomed through brainwashing and public education to believe that government already has power over you as a man (Creation) of God, and in this case, that you are already required to be vaccinated  but currently, out of the good graces of the legal gods, have exemption from that legal duty to that government as a person (property) of it. A legal exemption is a claim against a legal thing. Filing a legal exemption is not protection against forced vaccination, it is a claim of artificial rights invented and bestowed upon a feudal tenant of government, which can be revoked or refused at any time for the protection, security, and continuity of government. You can exercise religious exemption while it is allowed my your master because it has nothing to do with True religion. But what you can’t do is practice religious faith to say no to vaccines by the power and authority of God (Nature).

The moral of this story is that unless you act morally, spiritually, and without legal persona, you have no actual inherent right of exemption, because there is no such thing in Nature (Reality). Exemption is a sign that one is in the lowest form of beggary, of slavery, of despotism, of employment (use as property), of dependence upon a legal, state-bestowed franchise of artificial freedom much like a rat in a cage. The power to say no comes not from legal words in the legal matrix code created by false gods. The power to say no comes only from following the Law of God (Truth), which absolutely forbids acting in and respecting other persons and flattering titles, especially the false gods of government. To be clear, if you are not a person, you cannot be forced to be vaccinated. But you cannot just merely claim not to be a person. It doesn’t work that way. Just ask any illegal alien. To act religiously is to obey God’s Law in its fullness. The state will not recognize a free man (son) of God unless that man is actually acting under and as a son of God, of the Law, without deviation, without depravation, without departing the faith (Law), and without defection.

Unfortunately, as the title of this writing appears to promise at first glance, there is no actual (True) religious exemption from vaccination. It’s a misnomer (misnamed). It’s like a magic spell (spelling), where the word and the reality do not jive, just as the entire legal language dresses up Truth with fiction and misdirection. The God-honest Truth is that if you want your children to remain free from these nurse and doctor-delivered vials of poison that induce fast and slow-growing autoimmune disease, you must leave Babylon and take your children with you. And that requires absolute Love and total sacrifice. The state has tricked you into claiming through birth registration the abandonment of your parental (Natural) rights, delivering (abandoning) your child into wardship and apprenticeship to the nation (as a goyim). We are all birthed through trickery into this legal matrix (artificial womb), like a roach motel, but never told how to escape, how to unplug from the addiction of legalism. The state calls every child (and adult) as property through legal person-hood. In order for that to happen, it must trick you into that abandonment. It must cause you to be confused as to what it is for a child to be an actual property of the parent. No, a child is never a piece of property, as the legal realm attempts to establish through attachment of persona (legal identity/status). Belief that the person is the man (i.e. a child) is key, for identity means sameness in law. In other words, we are all tricked into believing that the person is the same as the man, a logical fallacy of monumental, Biblical proportions.

In Nature (God’s Realm), the word property is not connotative of possession as it is in legalese, but rather refers to Source. Origin. Truth. Natural connection. Family. Like hydrogen is a property of water and water is a property of Earth and Earth a property of the Universe (God), your child is a property (part) of your own Existence, and therefore a property of God’s Creation (the Universe), being a carrier of your blood (figurative, spiritual immortality, bloodline). The child’s blood is a property (ingredient) reflective of its parents (procreation). Not legal property, which is always a lie, but actual property which is a self-evident Truth. We were all tricked into selling those God-given, Natural rights of paternity, fooled into believing that the source of our God-given Natural rights are our own, not a property of God.

Self-ownership without God (Source) is the grand, communist delusion of the ages, where men believe that all inherent rights extend from man, not God, and therefore the Law of God can be bypassed by the selling of those rights in exchange for legal ones, entering the fictional construct of the legal matrix by pretending to abandon Nature (God) and Its Law. Yet in Nature (under God) we can never actually be spiritually defeated unless we choose (volunteer) to, for we never actually leave God, a self-evident Truth which the Bible states that God (Nature and Its Highest Law) never leaves our side if we choose and act in It. In Truth, we cannot Exist or Live without Source, without being a property of God (Nature) and Its Law. But we pretend that the self-evident Truth of Existence (God) doesn’t exist, that God doesn’t exist, and therefore that the power and authority (Law) of God (Nature) doesn’t exist. The status (persona) of legalism merely clouds the Truth with a lie, but the Truth cannot ever die, for no legal fiction exists without claiming some Truth as its victim and host. The duty of parenthood is part of the Law of Nature, not a right. A DUTY TO GOD, not to the state. But the state tricks us into abandoning our God-given Duty by relabeling and calling it a “legal right” that can be imaginarily transferred as a legal property, a fictional title. And we believe this lie so fervently that we are willing to allow the agents of the legalized state (corporation) to literally steal our True property (child) from our homes, without a fight, based on its assumed, mistaken legal identity — by a name that is not God-given.

But hey, who wants to give up that free public babysitting called education. After all, your lifestyle of free leisure time and employment are way more important than that of your health and that of your child, right? And everybody knows that the pursuit of happiness requires the pursuit of money, the root of all evil, right? Of course, your love of money is way more powerful and important than the health of yourself or your child, which is why the legal system runs on money, and why government is the printer, copywriter, lawmaker, enforcer, and banker of money, resting its whole international identity on the false valuation and respect of the evil that money represents. And that’s why, when government soon fulfills the already written requirement that all legal persons (citizenships) of the United States and other nations of goyim must be vaccinated, you will voluntarily and without hope take that poison as a mark that you are a beast of that legal system, that your love of money is more powerful than the love of your child, than your love or purity, than your love of God, and that you are indeed a Godless human without the ability to self-govern and use the gift of Free Will that God gave you. And your children’s children will follow in your weak and defeated example, that is, if the vaccines you allowed them to be tainted with don’t sterilize or destroy them as they’re designed to do.

But by all means, continue in this lunacy of trying to protect the legally bestowed religious exemption of fictional persons as if its already your own inherent right and not just an inconvenient leftover of the legalist thought of some damned outdated, idealistic moral inclusion by some past, slave-holding, false god.

No really, do as though wilt. That’s what they want, as long as it’s legal, and as long as you never actually act out based on any religious, moral thought. Think about it all you want, just don’t act on it without permission, licensing, and an approved, raised corporate seal under tax section 501.

If you want religious exemption, start acting religiously, and stop acting legally. Because using a legal persona is like wearing a condom… the legal persona is a prophylactic to Truth (God). You’ve no access to the Law of Nature, of Truth, from the fictional disposition of a legal (anti-God) persona. And that includes the actual moral choice you seek through legal “religious” exemption.

Heck, that’s such a simple concept that your kids will probably get it faster than you can. And you know what? If you are using your kids as an excuse, don’t. They can adjust way easier than you can to giving up the legal fiction. They’ll be much happier in Nature. They won’t be spoiled anymore. And they won’t suffer from the public school, Common Core blues.

It’s all on you, not them. You are their parent and protector. Start acting like it. It’s your God-given duty, and choice regarding such a Duty to God and to your child is a legally induced illusion for parents. You cannot shirk your responsibility and then pretend to have the very parental power you abandoned through legal birth certification and registration. You made a grevious error based on generational ignorance. Fix it or accept your own chosen, voluntary fate. Find God or remain in abandonment to your Source. Be a Natural and self-Existent property of God or remain a legal property of the state. And to fix the status of your child (property), which can only be a reflection of your own status, then you must first fix your own. You must be the one to sacrifice your false, secular lifestyle and perceived monetary wealth (mammon) therein, as the Bible tells you, crucifying it (the legal, fictional person) so as to be free and self-governing under the Highest Law. For a slave can never elevate its own issue (offspring) higher in law than his or her own legal status. A debt-slave can only bear another debt-slave, for status of an issue (property) depends upon the status of source. You cannot make gold from iron.

Or keep on pretending this knowledge doesn’t exist as you have your whole life. After all, a lifestyle of blatant hypocrisy in the legal matrix ain’t so bad… But I guarantee that it will require vaccination at some point.

The truth is, when you actually become a religious man, in your actions, in your mind body and soul, you won’t need any exemption. You won’t need to dodge bullets because they don’t exist except in the legal fiction matrix, and they can only harm the legal person of those men acting in agency and therefore in bond and surety to those legal persons, not men (sons) of God. The law of the legal matrix simply wouldn’t apply to you, because it’s finally beneath you and you refuse to plug in to any of its properties. You would, by your True religion, refuse to act in, believe in, or respect the persons, places, and things of the legal, commercial realm of mammon. You would see all things only as they really Exist, without artifice, without fiction, including those colored pieces of paper and their digital representations pretending to be money and credit/debt.

So please don’t send me any more inquiries about how to use legal exemptions against anything, unless you are first willing to fact the harsh Truth about your legally induced status (person-hood). I cannot help anyone that will not help themself. You seek legal power yet have none. It’s not Real, and neither, apparently, are you. Ironically, the power you seek Exists only in the Real, in that Realm of Nature and Its Law which you have voluntarily abandoned and continue to deny, that you continue to pretend to worship while wearing a spiritual condom (legal person), a fruitless effort that the Bible over and over tells you to avoid.

I’m sure your next question is how? How do I follow this seemingly impossible path back into Truth? Well, the answer is in the question. To Exist in Truth is to deny all lies, all fiction, all legalism, and all feigned power and delusion. The answers are laid out perfectly in the Bible, which provides metaphorical story after story to answer your questions. It’s why I wrote my book. I am not your judge, nor am I your guide or savior. You are. God (Nature/Truth) and Its Law is your destination, not some idol to worship falsely. But ignorance certainly guides no man of God, only lighting the path for the errands of fools.

Now you know.

Sorry to burst your bubble.

Not really.

.

–Clint richard-son (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Red Pill Sunday, August 25th, 2019

A Deconstruction Of The Death Of Christ: It’s Not What You Think


–=–

“But the natural (idiot/foolish) man receiveth not
the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him:
neither can he know [them], because they are spiritually discerned.”

–1 Corinthians 2:14

–=–

 

As a consummate Bible researcher nowadays, I am always looking for spiritual, reasonable explanations for the most unreasonable, ridiculous sounding of stories. There is, of course, a fine line between deciphering the absurd to find spiritual instruction and playing the fool. The king’s scribes were quite clever in their transliterations, leaving traps and pitfalls throughout the Crown’s copyrighted, English (dog-Latin) version. Some may take offense at the idea that I am calling the story of Christ’s death and resurrection as a somewhat ridiculous story, and to you otherwise reasonable people, I will simply offer to tell you why I say this over a glass of blood-turned wine along with Jonah inside the “whale’s” (translation sea monster’s) mouth aside a nice burning bush.

The ancient, well known, often utilized, and certainly well established Truth is that the more ridiculous an allegory or other moral story is portrayed, the more easily it is remembered. If you’ve ever bought one of those memory courses from a television infomercial as I did when I was a very young lad, you’ll find the same exact lesson on how ridiculousness supercharges the memory, complete with instructions on how to imagine the utmost ridiculous connections to different images in your head in order to remember a list of 100, or even 1,000 words. The stranger the image or description and correlation of those words in order, the more memorable that list becomes. Indeed, in trying to memorize cold a list of irrelevant words, I could not, my mind able to recite merely a few, out of order, and without coherent purpose. But when I applied the rules of ridiculousness, that is, when I followed the instructions and correlated the words as a continuous, absolutely absurd set of details in a story of my own imagination,  I was amazingly able to remember lists of 100 or more words, in order, by simply connecting each word as instructed. For example, if the first word is elephant and the second word is umbrella, I was instructed to imagine the most silly looking of elephants, complete with concerned expression and a polka-dotted leotard, that is holding an umbrella. And if the third word was then turtle, then I would imagine the elephant in the ridiculous leotard holding the umbrella up against falling turtles, themselves having something odd about them. If the forth word was water, then I would imagine the turtles doing an awesome 360 flip and while diving into the ocean, or if it were sunglasses, then of course the turtles would be sporting some shades. And so it went, word after totally unrelated word, placed by my mind into the most ridiculous of loosely linked, situational absurdities. And sure enough, as I pictured these things in my mind, I was able to spout off that list of words with hardly any effort at all, because who could resist that silly elephant holding an umbrella so as not to get hit by the falling turtles that were diving into the ocean with sunglasses, etc. etc.

When I consider all the True life stories I’ve heard over the years, as I am sure the reader would agree, again I find that I remember the most outlandish, ridiculous, or even most violent ones most often. I find myself telling stories about these events, and usually I do so because of their ridiculousness, their humor, or their horror. Comedians make whole stand-up routines based on such ridiculous stories, turning them into jokes that may or may not be true… but they sure are memorable. And of course we remember certain jokes because they are funny, and they are funny because they are absurd or even impossible in Nature. Perhaps they are embarrassing, or they remind us of something close to home or a personal experience. Whatever the case, we are wired to remember the most bizarre shit. We remember the harshness of violence, experiencing post traumatic stress, as another example. If I were to ask anyone where they were on 9/11/2001, they could probably tell me in detail, simply because what they really remember is a link between the out-of-place absurdity of watching the World Trade Centers burning and falling on television, because such an absurdity was in the background on every television screen, everywhere, making whatever one was doing that day stand out. In fact, when prompted to speak about that horrific event, many of us specifically reference whatever mundane task we were preforming and whatever usual place we were lingering. But if I were to ask anyone where they were three days before their 27th birthday, they most likely would have no clue. Why? No association. No correlation. No event to remember. No story to tell. Whatever stands out about the event, the story, the happenstance, and specifically the ridiculousness of the situation, the more memorable it is. It’s like a filter in the mind, where the details of what is considered as normal or routine are lost in the shuffle, but where learnable or unique moments shine through, teaching and preparing us for the future. After all, there’s a psychological reason why shock-jocks are so unwittingly popular and why news outlets have “breaking news” and cover certain stories for weeks at a time, 24 hours a day.

Entertainments are the same way. The more scary, the more ridiculous, the more fantastical, the more memorable they are. For how can one explain what does not exist, say in science fiction or fantasy, without a deep impression of that non-existent thing to the point of being able to picture it in ones mind? Yet most of us (I hope) can still distinguish between reality and fantasy. In other words, after seeing a fictional movie, we do not believe in those false, computer-enhanced images as what is actually real or as history. That would be Idolatry. And, I’m sorry and happy to say, religions are no exception to this rule.

Why are all the stories of the gods of all the cultures so ridiculous? Why are the gods tyrannical, manipulative monsters with multiple heads or some other superpower or supernatural attribute? From Zeus to the Babylonian creation story, these tales are physically, scientifically, and logically impossible to believe. Yet we remember them, don’t we? Many insist they are to be taken as literally True, as the Word of God, ironically and in idolatry assigning supernatural qualities to the God of Nature, while completely loosing the moral teaching intended through that ridiculousness. And I agree, they are the Word of God (Truth)… but only if you are taking them as the metaphor and moral story they are meant to be understood as. They are mythical because myth is memorable. All civilizations, all countries and nations, all religions, are built upon their own ridiculous myths about those that founded or formed them. Without the mythology of the founding fathers, there would be no purpose behind the United States, and certainly no reason to support what it has morphed into in modern times — a simulacra (a copy having nothing to do with its original) desperately promoting that patriot mythology as its reason for its post-modern existence. If Zeus was a librarian that had no authority, that shuffled books around all day without any other adventure or purpose, what could we possibly learn as his moral story? What would be memorable about his godliness?

The problem is that, while we remember the story, we often don’t remember or were never taught the point behind the ridiculous, impossible-to-be-True story. We are never told the moral lesson of the allegory. And so we take it literally, which in our minds causes the story to become historical “fact” instead of learning from the story (pretended history). We mistake facts with Truths. For instance, it is a fact that Han Solo and Chewbacca are ship-mates. But did you know it’s a fact that they are also lifelong friends? These are facts, in fiction. But they are not Truths. They are not the Word of God. There are many facts used to tell the story of the Law, that is, of the Word of God. Yet the Word (moral Law) is often lost behind belief in the facts, which aren’t Truths, only tools to cause Truth to shine. And often those facts are ridiculous, causing memory association. But as the Bible quote above suggests, the fool may not discern spiritual Truths because the fool is too busy trying to prove or disprove the facts, trying to prove the history instead of learning from it. It is foolish to believe that the purpose of the stories (mythos) of any history is to establish fact. Only the elite do this, and only to prove their power positions over the common people. These historical facts are institutional lies that justify completely unjustifiable rulers, which would have no purpose or reason behind their otherwise totally illegitimate rule if it weren’t for the established, embellished, generally bullshit historical fact they force us to learn in their public schools and institutions. And the only reason we fall for these so-called histories is because we forget their purpose their reason, their intention. We take them as literal instead of make-believe. We allow the most ridiculous events, like 9-11, to be used as historical facts in their justification for completely immoral, illegitimate, tyrannical laws to be passed against us. And we consider those laws somehow as truths instead of the prima facie (on their face) facts they actually are. We consider what is totally avoidable as that which is unavoidable, simply because we are tricked by their supposed factual history of inventions instead of learning from them. We don’t emulate the founding fathers in their dissent from the king, we treat them as gods, as the reason why their great grandchildren continue to rule the illegitimate United States corporation, which didn’t even exist until after those founding fathers (gods) were dead. In other words, prima facie means that these legal terms and laws are all facts as long as nobody questions their legitimacy, which is the description of every government. Corrupt men that seek power all have this trait in common — they turn the moral lessons meant to be learned by the retelling of history into the evidence of why they should be rulers. They turn myth into fact, and force it to be labeled and considered by fools as Truth.

Judging by the amount of narcissism taking place nowadays, I’d say the point of the story of Narcissus has been lost, for example. Perhaps they’ll name a cell phone camera model or selfie app after that unfortunate character of mythology? Or perhaps the story of the modern Narcissist must be rewritten to reflect the idiotic “accidents” taking place so often, as people walk off of cliffs while filming themselves doing so, even as they fall to their death on the craggy rocks below. Perhaps the myth of the Lemmings may need to be rewritten for these post-modern times, where those cute, cuddly creatures walk off the cliff with cell phones in their paws?

We may watch and enjoy movies like Clash of the Titans or Lord of the Rings without coming away from the story with its actual purpose for being told — the moral lesson. Unfortunately, the story of Jesus Christ and his death and resurrection are no different. When taken literally, as a purely historical event, the point of christ’s death is completely lost. It serves no purpose. It becomes an excuse instead of a cause. The moral takeaway and lesson of the life and death of Christ today for most “Christians” is just about as dead as that of the Greek gods.

In this study, I’d like to show you the exact place in the Bible where the spiritual, moral reason behind this story of Christ is explained. But first we have to understand what was the Babylonian, Mosaic tradition of animal and human sacrifice before the Christ (New Law) became the metaphoric, spiritual replacement for the literal sacrificial lamb.

PASCHAL – adjective – [Latin pascha.] Pertaining to the passover, or to Easter. (–Webster’s Dictionary of the English language, 1828)

PASSOVER – noun – [pass and over.] A feast of the Jews, instituted to commemorate the providential escape of the Hebrews, in Egypt, when God smiting the first-born of the Egyptians, passed over the houses of the Israelites, which were marked with the blood of the paschal lamb. 1. The sacrifice offered at the feast of the passover. (–Webster’s Dictionary of the English language, 1828)

EASTER – noun – A festival of the christian church observed in commemoration of our Savior’s resurrection. It answers to the pascha or passover of the Hebrews, and most nations still give it this name, pascha, pask, paque. (–Webster’s Dictionary of the English language, 1828)

–=–

Think these are the same holidays? Have you been told that Easter and Passover are similar in their celebrative purpose? It’s a lie. Don’t believe it. The story of Easter is designed to replace the Babylonian (i.e. Jewish) story of Passover just as the New Testament is meant to replace the Old. In other words, the sacrifice of the “Son of God” is designed to replace the sacrifice of animals to the Babylonian gods. The New Testament is designed not to eliminate but to fulfill the Old.

–=–

“Ever since the New Testament, the paschal lamb has been interpreted as prefiguring Jesus. In subsequent centuries, Church Fathers and later clergy taught that Jesus was the lamb of God, the new Passover sacrificeThe Christian who is quoted or paraphrased in Sefer Nitztzahon Yashan makes the curious argument: the difficulty of offering any rational reason for the details of the paschal sacrifice in Exodus 12 provesthat the text requires an allegorical explanation, and it must be an allegory about Jesus. This seems to have led Jews to work harder to prove that, on the literal level, the rules were meaningful, not arbitrary… Modern biblical scholars also struggle with the meaning of the ritual and the significance of these details, typically using anthropological tools to understand it, and suggesting that most of these rituals did not originate with a historical first Passover… Such is the nature of allegorical explanations. Christians claimed that the allegory was about Jesus, but there was nothing to stop another allegorist from giving a totally different explanation, in this case, that it was about the Jewish people as a whole.”

–Prof. Rabbi Martin Lockshin, excerpted from ‘Searching for the Meaning of the Passover Sacrifice, The need for medieval exegetes to suggest a plausible alternative to the Christian exegesis of this ritual’

–=–

The problem? Here we have an allegory trying desperately to be proven as a history. Happens all the time. Again, the fool completely misses the spiritual lesson, because to the fool, the spiritual lesson is foolishness, and the spiritual coldness and irrelevance of history and scientific proofs are paramount.

Now, before you get all bent out of shape because of some pseudo-religious belief that the modern conceptualization of “science” as the new, replacement-for-Christ savior of men is the holy grail of the atheist (fool) and the logician, hold your horses just a moment and think about what I’m saying here. Because this question is a very reasonable one that can easily and even scientifically be answered: can science be applied to the Bible? In other words, can science discern the moral value and intent from an allegorical story or mythological history? Can science be used to prove or disprove an allegory, a metaphor, an aphorism, a moral equivalent, or a mythology? Of course it can’t. What a fool one must be to attempt to apply science to a book of moral stories and inherent Laws intended as that which is not even in the realm of scientific observation! Shall we use science to examine whether or not Little Miss Muffet truly sat on a Tuffet, searching desperately through historical ruins to prove said tuffet and the girl that sat on it actually existed? Shall we merely take at its word the story of Mary and her supposedly little lamb and that its fleece was apparently white as snow? Was Wilber really “Some Pig” as Charlotte the Black Widow claims him to be, or was he just another side of bacon waiting to happen? You must understand that this is not a pro- or anti- science argument, but rather just a case where science isn’t even part of the topic. It simply isn’t necessary or relevant to the purpose and intent of the Bible as a moral teaching tool to invoke scientific methods. Spirituality and moral behavior is not a scientific subject. And it’s utterly ridiculous to attempt to try and prove or disprove the Bible’s allegorical, metaphorical nature with the tools of science. Perhaps the fact that this idea is so ridiculous is why it has caught on with such fervor among non-thinking fools. Yet one must ask such a purveyor of scientific proofs for allegorical stories this question: which is more ridiculous and unscientific, the Bible stories themselves, or trying to prove or disprove those moral stories with science? LOL! Why would anyone attempt to bring science into a moral discussion? Unless, perhaps, one wishes to purposefully confuse the very intent and purpose of the Bible’s allegorical mythos and moral lessons with some “factual” or “scientifically provable” history (an oxymoron) that never actually happened so as to justify whatever it is they call themselves… kings, priests, popes, magistrates, judges, jews, Christians, or just good old false gods?

The moral of this story is that morals cannot be proven by science. They are not of the same realm. That is to say that spiritual thought and action are not and cannot be scientifically justified. Inversely, there is no spirituality in science, for True science seeks only to understand Nature Itself, not decipher its spiritual meaning. Attempting to apply science to the Bible is like applying spiritual morals to a spiritless machine. It just doesn’t work. Yet, it certainly works to confuse and confound most people from understanding the Bible. In that way, science may very well, in the end, triumph over the minds of men and destroy our collective spirit.

You see, If the bible can be made into an artificially “factual” history (fact) instead of an allegory (moral Truth) in the minds of Christians… oh, wait, that’s already happened. That’s the purpose of legal corporations that in their corporate charters call themselves by differing, anti-Biblical, empty, denominational religious names. And each one has a history of its own. The Methodists have their founding father, John Wesley. The Catholics have their replacement (anti) God and vicar of christ, the Pope. The 7th Day Adventists have their very recent history of Ellen White and John Nevins Andrews, their own founding fathers. The Baptists founding father in Amsterdam was John Smyth, with John Clark or Roger Williams in America. Mormons have their bizarre history and replacement Christ in Joseph Smith, while scientology was apparently invented by L. Ron Hubbard, a science fiction author, after he made a bet between fellow high profile sci-fi writers over a poker game that Hubbard could not start a new, successful religion of his own. All religions have their histories, that is, their “facts” that are used to justify their own false, corporate doctrines. Nevermind the repeated warnings of the Bible that we should call no man as “father” nor take any other doctrine (law) but that of the Bible.

And that brings us back to the allegory of the passover…

Let us be clear that this so-called Jewish holiday, that of the celebration of the “pass-over” or paschal (lamb) sacrifice, was not the physical, literal killing or slaughtering of all the first born human sons and animals. That’s too ridiculous even for the Bible. But the consideration of it, that of the killing of children, was a powerful metaphorical conception that certainly did represent the taking away of the right of what is called primogeniture. This concept of law is not a physical attribute but a status, otherwise known in law as being the firstborn. And so we can quite fully understand the purpose of this allegory of the passover by simply understanding manmade law of the time, and therefore the purpose of putting to metaphoric death that spiritual status, that is, a right of succession.

PRIMOGENETUREnoun – 1. The state of being the firstborn child‘Maui and Tahaki are famous mythological heroes in Polynesia and they have more powerful manas than their elder brothers, though they are not the primogenitures.’ After the sin the primogenitures lost their privilege of serving in the Holy Temple and it was given to the Levites, who had abstained from the sin.’ 1.1 The right of succession belonging to the firstborn child, especially the feudal rule by which the whole real estate of an intestate passed to the eldest son(–Oxford Lexico.com Dictionary online)

PRIMOGENETURE – A historical term that refers to the rights and responsibilities of the first-born child among siblings in a family. When used in the legal sense, the term is used to discuss the right of the eldest son in the family to inherit his parents’ estate upon their death. The initial purpose of determining primogeniture was to keep an estate from being divided among siblings. When this was done, a parcel of land would continue to get smaller and smaller, which reduced the value of the overall property. To explore this concept, consider the following primogeniture definition.”

PRIMOGENETURE – (noun) – The state of being the firstborn child in the family. The system of inheritance or succession of the firstborn child, especially the eldest son

PRIMOGENETURE LAW – Primogeniture law historically determined that the first-born son among all of a couple’s children would inherit his parents’ entire estate upon their deaths. The purpose of this was so that the parcel of land would not end up being so subdivided that the value of each individual parcel would plummet. The term “primogeniture” was implied to refer to male children. If there were no male heirs, then primogeniture law determined that the property would be divided up among the daughters in equal shares. Primogeniture law actually hails from feudal England, and does not exist in the United States. (–Legal dictionary online, at https://legaldictionary.net)

–=–

Perhaps it slipped your mind that there happened to be no female children smitten by God (Jehovah) on that day of passover? Now, allegorically and legally, you know why. They simply were not male, and so not considered by law as “firstborn” and therefore had no right of primogeniture to put to figurative death. Disclaimer: No female children were harmed during the making of this allegory. This is what you might call as a big tell…

–=–

“And it came to pass, that at midnight the LORD (Jehovah) smote all the firstborn in the land of Egypt, from the firstborn of Pharaoh that sat on his throne unto the firstborn of the captive that was in the dungeon; and all the firstborn of cattle.” (–Exodus 12:29, KJB).
–=–

Only the “firstborn” (primogeniture) were “smote” by Jehovah. In other words, the right of succession to God’s Kingdom was allegorically usurped. This, by law and custom, and therefore by default, necessarily did not include any female children, which were never considered as firstborn. Again, it was the status of inheritable blood that was made figuratively dead, not the actual life of the child. Yet the blood-right remained (was saved) with the children of the Israelites, who escaped the “destroyer” of the “firstborn,” this word destroyer being a translation of the word shachath, which specifically means “moral corruption, rot, ruin, spoliation, perversion, or to be marred or marked (by evil/immorality).”” Yes, the destroyer (of spirituality and Truth) put to death all the “firstborn” male children (heirs), but this was a figurative, spiritual death, not a literal, physical one.

It is also very important not to confuse the “Jews” with the Israelites. These terms are not the same. The Israelites were men that followed the Law of God, that is, the Christ (Logos) as Law. The Jews (יְהוּדִי – Yĕhuwdiy; or Ἰουδαῖος, Ioudaios), were specifically defined as:

“The apostle John, inasmuch as agreeably to the state of things in his day he looked upon the Jews as a body of men hostile to Christianity, with whom he had come to see that both he and all true Christians had nothing in common as respects religious matters, even in his record of the life of Jesus not only himself makes a distinction between the Jews and Jesus, but ascribes to Jesus and his apostles language in which they distinguish themselves from the Jews, as though the latter sprang from an alien race: John 11:8; John 13:33. And those who (not only at Jerusalem, but also in Galilee, cf. John 6:41, 52) opposed his divine Master and his Master’s causeespecially the rulers, priests, members of the Sanhedrin, Pharisees — he does not hesitate to style οἱ Ἰουδαῖοι, since the hatred of these leaders exhibits the hatred of the whole nation toward Jesus: John 1:19; John 2:18, 20; John 5:10, 15ff,John 5:18; John 6:41,52; 7:1,11,13; 9:18,22; 10:24,31,33; 18:14.” (–Strong’s Concordance #G2453 entry, quoting THAYER’S GREEK LEXICON)

–=–

Hmm… sounds a lot like secular Israel and the worldwide, mostly atheistic jews (Ἰουδαῖοιof today, despite their masterful infiltration and blinding of Christian churches throughout the world.

Oh, but surely Christians and Jews can live together in harmony under the same Law, right? A Christian-Jewish Alliance? Forget the Bible, you’re racist if you don’t think so. That’s scientifically proven by the propaganda arm of the ADL!

As the Exodus story explains, it was the status of being firstborn (primogeniture), a legally recognized and spiritually induced (blood-right) status, that was in title only taken away from the Egyptians, including even Pharaoh’s own firstborn son (heir), whereas the firstborn of the Israelites (not jews) had their God-given rights preserved. God (Jehovah) figuratively passed over them in his taking away of the right of inheritance to God’s Kingdom, for they were not followers of the Law of Nature (God), that is, they did not respect the metaphoric lamb of God (Jesus Christ/Logos). But to understand this story the metaphor must be applied. Remember, this is not Clint’s opinion, this is defined straight out of the concordances and lexicons for the Bible. And this is just one of many hundreds of examples of the term death being used figuratively, meaning spiritual death, and signifying a loss of inheritance and access to God’s Law to defeat man’s.

All in all, the event is not even a religious one. In other words, it has nothing to do with religion, but is strictly an allegorical understanding of the law of inheritance and status as it applies to the Law of Nature (Christ).

The Egyptians and the Jews were, of course, idolators. They worshiped the false (untrue, unnatural), Babylonian gods. In other words, they did not worship and obey Truth (Nature) and Its Law. And so their horrific sacrifices were also made to idols (false gods).

Idol – Strong’s #G1497 – eidōlon

εἴδωλον, εἰδώλου, τό (εἶδος (cf. Winers Grammar, 96 (91); Etym. Magn. 296, 9)), in Greek writings from Homer down, an image, likeness, i. e. whatever represents the form of an object, either real or imaginary; used of the shades of the departed (in Homer), of apparitions, spectres, phantoms of the mind, etc.; in Biblical writings (an idol, i. e.):

1. the image of a heathen god: Acts 7:41; 1 Corinthians 12:2; Revelation 9:20 (Isaiah 30:22; 2 Chronicles 23:17, etc.; θεῶν ἤ δαιμον´ων εἴδωλα, Polybius 31, 3, 13);

2. a false god: Acts 15:20 (on which see ἀλίσγημα); Romans 2:22; 1 Corinthians 8:4, 7; 1 Corinthians 10:19; 2 Corinthians 6:16; 1 Thessalonians 1:9 (often in the Sept.); φυλάσσειν ἑαυτόν ἀπό τῶν εἰδώλων, to guard oneself from all manner of fellowship with heathen worship, (1 John 5:21).

–=–

Take the partaking (artificial sacrifice) of those little, corporately mass-produced, shitty-tasting little wafers and processed (unnatural), corporately manufactured grape (artificial) juice in church as a pretended “flesh” eating and “blood” drinking. What ever might the Bible say about that?

–=–

As concerning therefore the eating of those things that are offered in sacrifice unto idols, we know that an idol (G1497is nothing in the world, and that there is none other God but one… Howbeit there is not in every man that knowledge: for some with conscience of the idol (G1497) unto this hour eat it as a thing offered unto an idol; and their conscience being weak is defiled.”

—1 Corinthians 8: 4,7, KJB

–=–

“And were all baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea; And did all eat the same spiritual meat; And did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock was Christ.

—1 Corinthians 10: 2-4

–=–

Be not carried about with divers and strange doctrines. For it is a good thing that the heart be established with grace; not with meats, which have not profited them that have been occupied therein.”

—Hebrews 13: 9, KJB

–=–

Not only does the New Law of God (Christ) state not to worship or sacrifice idols, it also tells you that your meats should be spiritual, not worldly. And, of course, we find here one of many warnings not to follow strange doctrines, which basically is a reference to all modern, so-called “Christian” religions (worldly, secular corporations) and their useless, worldly ceremonies and rituals. The Bible is clear never to worship God in any of man’s false traditions, or in other words, never worship or pray to God through any artificial (manmade) invention.

Astoundingly, due to the stark ignorance of today’s populations in all nations, the planned reinvention and construction of the idol of the “Third Temple” reinvoking the Old, Babylonian law is under way. Here we find again blatant, and in my opinion purposeful, willful ignorance of the metaphoric, allegoric nature of the Biblical stories of the first two temples therein. This third temple can, according to the Bible, only stand and represent idolatry at its worst. Over and over we read that God’s Kingdom is not found in anything built by the hands of men. God’s Realm is Creation, not the resourced recreation of men. Therefore, any temple or other corporate church building is an idol, and every religion is necessarily a false, reinvented doctrine designed and incorporated (made legal under man’s false law) to misalign and replace God’s Law (doctrine) as told in Biblical allegory. The True Christian has no religion but that of unwaveringly following the example of Jesus Christ without artifice, s the personification of Logos (the Law of the Universe). And that just doesn’t include anything built by the hands (or minds) of men. For the Law of Nature, the Law of God, is self-Evident, self-Existent, as all of Nature and the Universe is, not an invention of man.

But in modern, Zionist-Jewish thought, from one Rabbi HaRav Avraham Yitzchak HaCohen Kook, the First Ashkenazi Chief Rabbi of Israel, revered and famed Torah sage, philosopher, writer, poet, iconic and beloved leader of religious Zionism and the return to Zion (1865-1935), is as expected completely foreign and opposed to Christ (God’s Law of Nature), using logical fallacy to promote pointless animal slaughter as idol sacrifice:

Will There be Sacrifices in the Third Temple?

Rav Kook’s views on the Temple service are sometimes misconstrued. A superficial reading of a passage in Olat Re’iyah (vol. I, p. 292) indicates that only grain offerings will be offered in the reinstated Temple service. To properly understand Rav Kook’s approach, it is necessary to read a related essay from Otzarot HaRe’iyah.]

What will the rebuilt Temple be like? Will we really offer animal sacrifices once again?

Protecting Animals

Some people object to the idea of sacrifices out of concern for the welfare of animals. However, this objection contains a measure of hypocrisy. Why should compassion for animals only be expressed with regard to humanity’s spiritual needs? If our opposition to animal slaughter is based not on weakness of character, but on recognition of the issue’s fundamental morality, then our first step should be to outlaw the killing of animals for food, clothing, and other material benefits.

In the world’s present state, the human race is weak, both physically and morally. The hour to protect animal life has not yet arrived. We still need to slaughter animals for our physical needs, and human morality requires that we maintain clear boundaries to distinguish between the relative value of human and animal life.

At this point in time, to advocate the protection of animals in our service of God is disingenuous. Is it moral to permit cruelty towards animals for our physical needs, yet forbid their use for our spiritual service, in sincere recognition and gratitude for God’s kindness? If our dedication and love for God can be expressed – at its highest level – with our willingness to surrender our own lives and die al kiddush Hashem, sanctifying God’s name, then certainly we should be willing to forgo the life of animals for this sublime goal…

Hints to the Future

Even in the current reality, we may feel uncomfortable about killing animals. This does not mean that the time for full animal rights has already arrived. Rather, these feelings come from a hidden anticipation of the future that is already ingrained in our souls, like many other spiritual aspirations.

Hints of these future changes may be found in the text of the Torah itself. Thus, it says that offerings are slaughtered on the northern side of the altar. Why this side? The north traditionally represents that which is incomplete and lacking, as it is written, “Out of the north, the evil shall break forth” (Jeremiah 1:14). In other words, the need to slaughter animals is a temporary concession to life in an incomplete world.

Furthermore, the Torah stipulates that sacrifices must be slaughtered “lirtzonchem” – “willingly”(Lev. 19:5). The Temple service must correspond to our needs and wants. As the Talmud in Erchin21a explains, one must be able to say, “I want to bring this offering.” When the slaughter of animals is no longer generally acceptable to society, this condition will not be fulfilled.

Finally, the Torah describes a person offering an animal sacrifice as “adam” (Lev. 1:2). This word indicates our current state of moral decline, a result of the unresolved sin of Adam, the first man. An individual offering a grain offering, on the other hand, is called “nefesh,” or “soul” (Lev. 2:1). The word nefesh implies a deeper, more essential level of humanity, independent of any temporary failings.

(Excerpt from: Arutz Sheva 7, IsraelNationalNews.com – quoting from Gold from the Land of Israel pp. 173-176. Adapted from Otzarot HaRe’iyah, vol. II, pp. 101-103; Olat Re’iyah vol. I, p. 292, sent to Arutz Sheva by Rabbi Chanan Morrison, RavKookTorah.org)

–=–

Read that again, would ya?

This blatant, temple-based return to the idolatry of the Babylonian, Mosaic Old Law should be a frightening nightmare to any moral man, yet we find the entirety of the so-called “Christian” religions brainwashed to be in praise and service to this Biblically defined, anti-Christ brood. This is the ultimate in antichrist rhetoric and action. This is literally the undoing of the allegory and purpose of the Christ story. This is the killing of Jesus Christ, in other words, the destruction of the New Testament Law (Law of Nature) and the reinstatement of the Old, secular Babylonian law. To be antichrist is to be against God’s Law, the New Testament, as exemplified by the allegory (example) of Christ. This is the very definition of the biblical word Jew, as we read above. It’s what all Christians should expect from Jews, again, as defined in the Bible. It’s their reason for existence, to defeat what they call openly as the false savior, Jesus Christ (New Law). This has nothing to do with race, or opinion, and everything to do with moral, spiritual consciousness toward Jehovah (Nature), that is, God’s Creation and Its Law.

And so we come, in the Bible, to where the reasoning behind this turning point from the law of men under Babylon and its false gods to the Law of Nature is explained, as the emergence of the New Law (Testament) based on the allegory of Jesus Christ. The purpose behind the Christ allegory, that is, the personification (story) of Jesus Christ as a man following the Law of Nature (Jehovah), was quite eloquently authored to replace the Babylonian hell of these idolators and their bloody, sacrificial rituals to false gods. This was made quite clear in the 9th chapter of Hebrews:

Heb 9:1 – Then verily the first covenant had also ordinances of divine service, and a worldly sanctuary.

Heb 9:2 – For there was a tabernacle made; the first, wherein was the candlestick, and the table, and the shewbread; which is called the sanctuary.

Heb 9:3 – And after the second veil, the tabernacle which is called the Holiest of all; (Author’s note: see here that a building made by the hands of men is called the Holiest of all instead of that which is God or a Creation of God’s Nature. In other words, these temples were sanctuaries against Jehovah/Nature, not in support of It.)

Heb 9:4 – Which had the golden censer, and the ark of the covenant overlaid round about with gold, wherein was the golden pot that had manna, and Aaron’s rod that budded, and the tables of the covenant;

Heb 9:5 – And over it the cherubims of glory shadowing the mercy seat; of which we cannot now speak particularly.

Heb 9:6 – Now when these things were thus ordained, the priests went always into the first tabernacle, accomplishing the service of God.

Heb 9:7 – But into the second went the high priest alone once every year, not without blood, which he offered for himself, and for the errors of the people:

Heb 9:8 – The Holy Ghost this signifying, that the way into the holiest of all was not yet made manifest, while as the first tabernacle was yet standing:

Heb 9:9 – Which was a figure (idol) for the time then present, in which were offered both gifts and sacrifices, that could not make him that did the service perfect, as pertaining to the conscience;

Heb 9:10 – Which stood only in meats and drinks, and divers washings, and carnal ordinances, imposed on them until the time of reformation.

Heb 9:11 – But Christ being come an high priest of good things to come, by a greater and more perfect tabernacle, not made with hands, that is to say, not of this building (idol);

Heb 9:12 – Neither by the blood of goats and calves, but by his own blood he entered in once into the holy place, having obtained eternal redemption for us.

Heb 9:13 – For if the blood of bulls and of goats, and the ashes of an heifer sprinkling the unclean, sanctifieth to the purifying of the flesh:

Heb 9:14 – How much more shall the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself without spot to God, purge your conscience from dead works to serve the living God?

Heb 9:15 – And for this cause he is the mediator of the new testament, that by means of death, for the redemption of the transgressions that were under the first testament, they which are called might receive the promise of eternal inheritance.

Heb 9:16 – For where a testament is, there must also of necessity be the death of the testator.

Heb 9:17 – For a testament is of force after men are dead: otherwise it is of no strength at all while the testator liveth.

Heb 9:18 – Whereupon neither the first testament was dedicated without blood.

Heb 9:19 – For when Moses had spoken every precept to all the people according to the law, he took the blood of calves and of goats, with water, and scarlet wool, and hyssop, and sprinkled both the book, and all the people,

Heb 9:20 – Saying, This is the blood of the testament which God hath enjoined unto you.

Heb 9:21 – Moreover he sprinkled with blood both the tabernacle, and all the vessels of the ministry.

Heb 9:22 – And almost all things are by the law purged with blood; and without shedding of blood is no remission.

Heb 9:23 – It was therefore necessary that the patterns of things in the heavens should be purified with these; but the heavenly things themselves with better sacrifices than these.

Heb 9:24 – For Christ is not entered into the holy places made with hands, which are the figures (idols) of the true; but into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of God for us:

Heb 9:25 – Nor yet that he should offer himself often, as the high priest entereth into the holy place every year with blood of others;

Heb 9:26 – For then must he often have suffered since the foundation of the world: but now once in the end of the world hath he appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself.

Heb 9:27 – And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment:

Heb 9:28 – So Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many; and unto them that look for him shall he appear the second time without sin unto salvation.

–=–

The point? Worshiping God through idols was ceased, where Jesus Christ (personification and example of Logos) replaced those idols. We are called in the New Testament not to worship Jesus Christ as God or as an idol, but to become Christlike in our actions under Gods Law so as to worship Jehovah. Instead of sacrificing idols to God, we are to be the sacrifice ourselves, sacrificing (crucifying) all worldly things so as to live spiritually, in the Realm of God’s Nature and under Its Law. We are to become the sons of God by following the example. In this way, the sacrifice is Real, not made in idolatry, or in other words, we act on and under the Law of God (Nature) instead of just using idols as an excuse not to follow that Law. In essence, what this is saying is that a man cannot make his sins disappear in some mock, ceremonial atonement, by killing , mutilating, and bleeding dry some poor defenseless animal that is part of God’s Creation, for this pointless, purposeless murder of an innocent beast is certainly a sin in and of itself. It makes about as much sense as hunting elephants and giraffes for sport. You cannot cleanse your own blood of its sin by taking that of another, completely innocent beast. No, it is you that must stop acting like a beast, sacrificing from your spiritual Life that which is of the world of the flesh, the world of men (i.e. secularism, legalism). Instead of slaying innocent beasts as the Babylonian false gods demanded, man must follow the example of Christ (the Law of Nature personified) in order to rectify ones own sin — to be reborn from the realm of man’s law into the realm of God’s Law, in order to go back to Nature (God). In other words, this means that the legal person, the respect of fiction and the law that governs fiction, the lies, must die (metaphorically), so that the spiritual man may emerge without legal ties (false law) that prevent a man from acting under God’s Law. One cannot be saved from the trappings of false religion and worldly afflictions through useless killing in idolatry. It is our blood that must be spiritually purified. Thus, the Christ allegory is a guidepost allowing all men to return from the Babylonian woe, from Jewish (antichrist) influence, back to the very Nature we are born originally into. We that shed what the Bible refers to as sin can only do so by following the Law of Nature (Logos). For sin is just a general term meaning artifice, lies, fictions, idolatry, and self-deceit. SYN. That which is synthetic, not of Nature, not of God’s Realm or under Its’ Law.

So let’s put these pieces together here…

The Bible Law (i.e. common law of blood-right) says that in order for a testament to be valid, its testator (author) must be dead. No death, no inheritance. So one must ask oneself, how does an undying, “Living God” (Jehovah), defined as the entirety of Existence, the Universe and Nature Itself in Supreme Being (the verb Being, as Existence Itself), construct such a testament and still remain the eternal, never-ending, Living God? Here we may better understand the purpose behind the allegory of the Son (testator) of God, or He that was allegorically sent to die for our sins, in order that the New Testament (New Law of God) might be left to all men through death, a requirement of the law of the testator. This is figuratively the exact story played out in the maxims of law. In other words, this is an allegorical representation of what all men must suffer; namely, to be reborn from civil (legal) death in exchange for spiritual (True) Life under God, under the Law of Nature (Jehovah), personified in the story (allegory) of Christ. And yet it is so clearly written here that this True Life of substance without idolatry and empty sacrifice cannot be attained by merely participating in religious ceremonies and false sacrificial “communions” of eating meats (defined scripturally as any foodstuffs, literal or figurative) to false idols. This ceremonial custom of animal sacrifice, in fact, is surprisingly, completely against scripture, as we can read above. Just as you can’t squeeze blood from a turnip, as the saying goes, you certainly cannot squeeze the spiritual (figurative) blood of christ (atonement/forgiveness of sins) out of a communion wafer or other idol, and especially not from one of God’s own innocent Creatures. And no, grape juice is not a substitute for the works of, in, and under the blood of christ (Logos – God’s Law personified).

While the current false doctrines of corporate, religious gobbledygook and the ceremonial nonsense it promotes is enough to drive men away from such spiritually sound principles as the notion of the True meaning and intent behind the “blood of christ” and the reason for this story of the ultimate sacrifice by God — that a testament necessarily means the death of its testator — we may understand that the never-ending, never-changing God (Jehovah) cannot die lest we all figuratively die with It, waking up to our True, spiritual Nature. Therefore, the Son of God must be sacrificed, so that the Law (Will) of God may be testified and transferred to us. But in order to inherit this set of principles, we must become the sons of God ourselves. Jesus Christ is our example of how to do this, by following the Law of God. As Its sons, we become the spiritual, figurative primogeniture of God’s Kingdom (Nature). If you try and take this as literal, you will never understand It nor find yourself in It. You must reach deep down and find what is lost, that is, the ability to Love and cherish such moral stories and allegories for what they are intended to give you, learning from them as intended, and then acting accordingly. Poetry is, it turns out, for Real men. In other words, man may now Live Truly under this New Testament of Law, by the Will of Jehovah, by following in the sacrificial (metaphoric) blood of christ as a brotherhood of God’s sons. And what is so beautiful about this concept is that it literally requires nothing. No thing. No persons, places, or things (nouns/names). It is the negative Law, the Law of Truth, and Truth has no name (noun). It is the realm of God, of Nature, of that which is unblemished by the names and titles and defects and marks and fictional rights of man’s law and custom. He that is of God is the lesser part of God. Yet he who falls from such Grace is still of the Greater Good (God), the Higher Whole, but is tricked into allowing (consenting) that which is lesser in Law to overtake him. For the Greater always contains the lesser, just as the principal always contains the agent, the truster the trustee, the employer the employee, and so on. Hierarchically speaking, the power and Glory and Grace of that which is of Jehovah never loses its power or its Law, for the Law of Nature reigns supreme at all times, knowing that without it no Existence of any kind, Real or artificial, would Exist, as all self-Existence is literally Jehovah defined. All other forms of so-called “existence” are artificial, or that which is a re-creation of man. Thus, the foundational, scripture-based maxims of law spell out and follow exactly what one would expect.

But there is a problem. For the scriptures, after so much shared wisdom and warning with regards to the trickery of men and the simple instructions given from the perspective of being in Grace in recognizing everything that is false and of the father of lies (i.e. the re-creations of man influenced by devilish, adversarial intentions), also give us the free will to go against the Will of God, to break the Law and Covenant. The willing fool has no place in God’s Realm and has no access to God’s Law. He that should worship and express joy by the deceits and trickery of the lies of mans’ artifice, enjoining himself to that which is below him in persona (mask) and flattering title (idol), shall then be under the law of that which is lower than him, representing spiritual death, as the inability to govern ones own actions under God’s Law. So says the Bible — and thus the foundational maxims of law agree.

Many of the Highest maxims of law are simply constructs stripped from the Bible. This should be of no surprise when one understands that the Bible (as the unwritten, moral Law) is the foundation of the common law, and that, therefore, the unwritten was copied unto the written (Roman) law for the purposes of opposition. In other words, the unwritten, moral law must be recognized in order for the written, immoral law to have purpose, otherwise there is no reason for man’s law. Without recognition of Christ (God’s Law/Logos) there is no need or use for anything anti-christ. There is no left without right, no up without down, no light without darkness, no evil without good. To understand this, one must understand that God’s Law is neutral, whereas the Law of Rome is strict and sanctioned (punishable). By neutrality I mean that God’s Law is the Law of Nature, as is an inevitable Act of God, meaning the Act had nothing to do with man’s designs, inventions, or interference. It just Is. It Exists with or without man’s presence. A lightening strike causing a fire is an Act of God. It is a neutral event in Nature, and only a fool would believe it to be targeted at anything or sent for the purposes of some man’s judgement. What arrogance, conceit, and outright idiocy must it take for any man to believe that the power of the Universe (God) can or should be directed at any other man, or upon oneself. Yes, I will certainly concede that the idiot that ignorantly walks into a lightening storm without the fear of the Universe (God’s Nature and Law) increases his chances of being judged for his stupidity, if you will. But the purpose of that discharge of energy we call as lightening has for its purpose nothing to do with any man or any other object it connects with. If man didn’t exist, lightening would still strike wherever Nature’s Design warranted it. And so it is with the notion of God’s Judgment. When the Law of God, the Law of Nature, and the Laws of Nature are broken, then it is only reasonable to conclude that some consequence (judgement) will follow, rebalancing the metaphorical scales of Nature’s permanent Design. Poison the drinking well, and the user of that well will be judged (poisoned) for his own sin. Eat unnaturally according to FDA recommendations and be judged with obesity, diabetes, cancer, or other illness. This is a neutral, or rather a causality effect, not a religious one. We reap what we sow, and most of the time we deserve the fate we create for ourselves.

The deceits promulgated by the church and state are seemingly insurmountable at times, just as the perceived need of money, the root fo all evil, is certainly the great destroyer of our time. To be deceived is a choice, and the Bible allows all men to be deceived if they choose to be. Free will… And, of course, the legal law of men depends upon deceit. Without deceit, there would be no nations, no governments, and no false gods heading those governments. The maxims of man’s law repeatedly tell us that he who seeks to be deceived cannot then complain about being deceived when he acts voluntarily in that deceit. Deceit is made legal by governments of the legal (artificial) realm, by contract, and specifically by voluntary participation in that deceitful practice. Contracts are the strings that control the puppet, which is why the Bible forbids them. For a contract is always between legal persons and therefore under the law of fictional (legal) persons, not God’s Law. Ignorance of God’s Law is no more an excuse than ignorance of man’s legal law according to its maxims and to the Bible. The difference is plain though, for the Bible warns against such deceits and gives you the Law of God (the allegory of Christ personified) in order to escape them. Thus, God’s Word (Law) is said to be the Armor of God, or in other words, the Shield and Sword of Truth (God). The Truth (God) will set you free, but only if you follow the Law of God (Truth/Nature) exemplified by the allegory of Christ. The legal system wholly depends on self-deceit, on illusion, on trickery, on dissimulation, and on the fact that those that are deceived remain in such a state of decay.

Job 12:16  – With him is strength and wisdom: the deceived and the deceiver are his (the destroyers’).

2Ti 3:13 – But evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse, deceiving, and being deceived.

Deu 11:16 – Take heed to yourselves, that your heart be not deceived, and ye turn aside, and serve other gods, and worship them;

Job 15:31 – Let not him that is deceived trust in vanity: for vanity shall be his recompence.

Luk 21:8 – And he said, Take heed that ye be not deceived: for many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and the time draweth near: go ye not therefore after them.

1Co 6:9-10 – Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.

1Co 6:11-12 – And such were some of you: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God. All things are lawful unto me, but all things are not expedient: all things are lawful for me, but I will not be brought under the power of any.

1Co 15:33 –  Be not deceived: evil communications corrupt good manners.

Gal 6:7 –  Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.

Rev 18:23 – And the light of a candle shall shine no more at all in thee; and the voice of the bridegroom and of the bride shall be heard no more at all in thee: for thy merchants (corporations) were the great men (artificial persons) of the earth; for by thy sorceries (pharmacopeia) were all nations deceived.

–=–

There is only one Law of Existence, of Nature, of Reality. The word Law is hardly adequate to describe It, for what word can possibly define what is self-Evident? This self-Existent (non-man-made) Order or Design is called as God’s Law, for God Is Reality, Is Truth, Is Nature, and Is All self-Existence — all that is not man-made. This Order of Nature, called as the Law of Nature (God), stands in self-evidence without exception, and is not alterable by men or by the artificial laws invented by men. All other so-called law is man-made, is consensual, voluntary, temporary, meaning that it must be contracted like any disease. And like a disease, man’s law will die without a host, without a volunteer, without victims; but only if you stop respecting it as Real, as part of God’s Nature. It always requires the breaking with the Law of God (Nature). There are no exceptions. There is no other law (doctrine) that does not specifically require one to break the Law of God, for no law of man is a self-evident part of God, that is, of Existence (Truth). No law of man is also a Law of Nature. There is no purpose for any law invented by man except to break the Law of God. There is no permit or license that is not intended to break with the Law of God. There is no legal person, place, or thing (name/noun) that is not intended to exist outside of the Realm and thus Law of God’s Nature. There is no positive invention by man that is not intended to control, harness, deceive, or destroy that which is a negative (already Existing) Creation of God. Man can only create artifice (art), and another word for art is technology. Only when mans creation is in harmony with and designed to protect and serve Nature can it be of the Will and Testament (Law/Word) of God. All of this is self-evident Truth, for the only Truth is God and that which is Created under and in harmony with Its Law. God does not invent, only man does.

The fool may consider such rhetoric to be a form of circular logic (dialectic). And yet no logic of man need be applied to the self-Existence of Godly things (of Nature). The circular notion of false logic is apparent by the flaws of its argument in referential to man-made (artificial) support for its accuracy. No-one can argue that Nature, in any way, is illogical, nor especially unreasonable. Its Design is beyond man’s capability of comprehension by use of the vulgar languages (including mathamatics), as all spiritual things are. What appears to the sophist as a circular logic is the very power of the negative aspect of Nature, which cannot be defeated by any positive (invention of man), unless one consents to that legal (anti-God) “fact” or “invention/design.” But a fact is not a Truth, and no facts need Exist in Nature, for Existence itself is self-evident Truth. Truth (God) needs no positively considered or pretended facts to Exist, and neither therefore does man. And that’s the point! That’s the power of God (Truth) — of being an anonymous part of God and thus part of and under the authority of the only whole and Highest Truth. In a spiritual and yes even circular way, one is protected from all lies when one remains in this circle of Truth, never allowing fiction and lies to break that spiritual circle. As they say, the Truth will set you free. For this circle is Real. It is Reality; the cycle of Nature. It is the realm of those who Live in and by the Grace of God and never accept what man has to offer in contract and thus become bound under the law of contracts (persons). For remember, a contract is only needed for those who seek to break with the Will and Testament (Law) of God, of self-government, of Love, Charity, Trust, Truth, and self-discipline. There are no contracts in Nature, in Love, in Charity, nor especially in Forgiveness. Understand this, and you may then literally and spiritually “under-stand” God’s Law. But if you comprehend it without applying it, you are indeed the very definition of a hypocrite (idolator).

–=–

“A contract founded on a base and unlawful consideration, or against good morals, is null.”

–Contractus ex turpi causa, vel contra bonos mores nullus est.  Hob. 167; Dig. 2, 14, 27, 4.

–=–

“The law never suffers anything contrary to truth. But sometimes it allows a conclusive presumption in opposition to truth.”

–Contra veritatem lex numquam aliquid permittit. ” 2 Co. Inst. 252. 24 See 3 Bouv. Inst. n. 3061.

–=–

“The agreement of the parties overcomes or prevails against the law.” 

–Conventio vincit legem. 2 Story, Ag. § See Dig. 16, 3, 1, 6.

–=–

The foundational maxims of law do not suffer anything that is not of the realm of Truth. But when a man can be tricked and deceived into entering into the legal contracts of the devil (attorneys), then this maxim invoking the power of Truth is bypassed. The law will suffer anything you can be deceived into accepting and volunteering for. For under contract, the Armor of Truth (God) is stripped from every man.

To avoid what is avoidable (man’s inventions and false, legal law) one must consciously avoid it. But once we accept or contract into what is avoidable, namely fraud, what is avoidable becomes unavoidable. This is where most of us stand. We are accepting and participating contractually in fraud (hypocrisy). The contract is valid because we don’t call it what it is. And if we do, if we understand the fraud, none of us are acting morally against it. Words are idols if those words are not acted upon, and so calling something as fraud while still acting in it is idolatry. Thus, we are still volunteering in that which is avoidable, for to nullify an immoral or otherwise unlawful contract under both realms of the law one must act with moral rectitude in opposition and avoidance against it. We are not doing so. The contract is lawful as long as the parties agree to it. And our agreement comes not in the form of words, but in the form of our actions in support of those legal (artificial) words. Contracts are excuses not to act under God’s Law. We act in the fraud, that is, in legal persona, therefore we accept the fraud. We pretended to become the fiction (person/title) and continue to pretend to be it. In other words, we are not following Christ (God’s Law), and are instead accepting the false, legal law (doctrine) of men. The legal system cannot be made null until men stop acting legally within it (against God’s Nature and Law). And most importantly, we cannot worship God nor follow Christ (Law) while acting in a legal persona (mask) that is required as property (status inside) of government to follow the legal, man-made, anti-God, antichrist, false law of men.

This was and is the reason behind the New Law, the New Testament, the allegorical blood sacrifice of Jesus Christ (Logos). We are part of the story. We were, through and because of the sacrifice of Logos, given cosmic free will. We were given the ability to attempt to break with the Law of Nature in a legal matrix of total self-deceit, though in Reality this is impossible. We were allowed to play the fool. But once we recognize ourselves as the fool, as I have recognized myself to be, it’s this point in our lives that we must either die to the secular world in order to find spiritual Life under God and Its Law, or we will continue, as so many of us are, to live by the deceits of the flesh in self-deceit and in hypocrisy.

If you’ve read this up to this point, then you know right now whether you are a hypocrite like me, or you are a son of God. If you are pretending to be the idol of a “Christian” then you know that such a placed upon yourself as a flattering title is either well-deserved by your actions or is carried in deceit as a false show in idolatry. And finally, you know now that the Bible cannot be dismissed as religious nonsense, and that should you choose to lift yourself out of this voluntary self-deceit that it’s you and only you that has the power to become Christ-like, to make the allegory of Christ become your own True story. You have the Armor. Now you must decide to bear it or throw it off for the sins (untruths) of the secular world.

And if you’re honest with yourself right now, you know the Truth is that you already know the answer, you already know your decision, because you already know the path, and from this point on you are either on that path or you are not. For most of you, including myself, this is what it feels like to Truly be a hypocrite.

Welcome to hell…

.

–Clint richard-son (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Wednesday, August 21st, 2019

 

Orwell’s New Law: Intolerance Is Tolerance


—=—

“A man in debt is so far a slave.”

—Ralph Waldo Emerson

—=—

I’ve got something to say, and you probably aren’t going to like it. And try as you will to dispute it, the Truth is a piercing sword, unable to be deflected even in this time of great deceit — this grand delusion.

Yes, freedom is slavery. It’s called the commercial franchise of national citizenship (legally called as freedom), a reimagined form of denizenship as a post-modern neo-feudalistic form of the same old debt-slavery of yesteryear.

Yes, we understand that war is peace. These are merely the two different extremes of a legally (secularly) bound international commerce, the state of war being a violent purge of uncooperative nations or people (tribes) seeking independence from a slave-inducing, interconnected world currency and its performance-debtor slave system through extortive taxation and internationally imposed sanctions. When the violent, murderous trade war ceases, the then subdued, defeated nations submit to the usual forced but supposedly voluntary “peace” of commerce via international trade yet again. The difference between war and peace is merely a declaration of one or the other, though both have the same goal, to profit the elite bloodlines of archons behind nation-building and United Nations programs that assure free-flowing commerce (peace) between those internationally bound corporations (nations).

And yes, we have witnessed globally that ignorance is strength. But this phenomenon is only understandable from the perspective of national governments toward their enslaved, enfranchised (free range) masses (common human live-stock), as we are hopelessly educated and entrained by entertainments and standardized, institutionalized lies (also called history), and of course what is quickly becoming our very own censored, institutionalized newspeak. My people around the world are, without a doubt, being destroyed and controlled through a mandated, standardized system that teaches and instills a guaranteed lack of knowledge. It’s called public education.

But there is an underlying Orwellian, that is, dystopian maxim that stands as the foundation for all of this, the source behind all three of these seemingly paradoxical but fully demonstrable states of induced, artificial existence detached from Nature (God), which have led to this now globalist Newspeak society we pretend to exist in. There is one ingredient, one agenda that must be pushed universally for this trifecta of dark, globalist tyranny to prevail…

There must be a despotically enforced, unequivocal (absolute) state of artificial, passively consented-to tolerance.

—=—

Our rulers can have no authority over natural rights,
only as we have submitted to them
.
The rights of conscience we never submitted.
We are answerable for them to our God.
The legitimate powers of government extend
to such acts only as injurious to others
.”  

—Thomas Jefferson

—=—

What is the highest moral (Natural) Law? To do no harm, without exception, including the use of words as weapons.

What do the governments of men thrive upon? Doing harm, and more specifically causing us all to harm one another in any way legally possible (permissively through words) as a dysfunctional lifestyle. In other words, creating and administering dystopia — a debtor’s hell.

Our society is like a poker game, consisting of a set of neighbors (players/actors) that pretend a sort of cordial camaraderie and shallow friendship while secretly seeking to competitively out-do, defeat, destroy, and bankrupt each other. Every player at the poker table is necessarily, situationally, and by disposition subjected into being a member of the anti-cult of the Joneses, always seeking to one-up each other, prideful and miserly of their continued earnings, existing solely for the purpose of profit and gain. Meanwhile, the dealer (government and banker) sets and administrates the rules of this necessary, mutually required illicit conduct, allowing legally (permissively) this abhorrent behavior within a prescribed, licensed set of rules. For this administrative “service” the dealer (government) legally steals (taxes) for its own profit the total wealth spent in each transaction (poker hand), raking in a small percentage from each round of cards (commerce) being dealt for the house — an administrative fee, of course. But as the total money left on the table is constantly diminished by this house service charge (called the take), each neighbor must constantly refresh the money pool with his own savings or, finally, leave bankrupt (as a broke loser). Essentially, this is how governments corral and subjugate their common citizenry, setting the rules of “commerce” (the rules of the game) so that we are all constantly practicing deceit and treachery toward one another while feigning to be good neighbors, the ultimate hypocrisy (simulation). It’s just business, we are entrained to say, as if this is some viable excuse to break the highest law of Nature (God) to love your neighbor, to do no harm, and to act always in love, charity, and forgiveness. But, of course, there would be no poker games or need for government if this moral, spiritual, “unwritten” Law was respected absolutely. Gambling, as does citizenship, requires God’s Law (and therefore natural rights) to be trampled underfoot. In legality, the only duty that can be found is the taxation laid upon us all. Instead of acknowledging and fulfilling our moral duty to all men, we pay a duty (tax) so that we don’t have to. Legalism is, after all, the undoing of God’s (Nature’s) Law.

The point? The legal law can only control us if we can be made to voluntarily, continuously harm and injure one another through legal (man-made) methods of false law. To injure, in legalism, means to bring someone or something IN to and therefore under the legal LAW (jure) by means of invoking it in commerce (contract), or in other words by causing all actions of men to be done through a government assigned, artificial, legal persona (mask) — men acting not in Nature (under God and Its Higher Law) but instead in legal (artificial) persona, a false “strawman” that is property of the commercialized corporation of government. We tolerate harm in every way, to each other and to ourselves, as if it’s a normal, or even natural part of “life” as citizenships (debt-slaves). We are acting as commercial vessels, and therefore, as feudal vassals.

VASSALnoun – 1: A person under the protection of a feudal lord to whom he has vowed homage and fealty: a feudal tenant2: One in a subservient or subordinate position. (–Webster’s Dictionary Online, current)

—=—

Maxim of law: With protection comes subjection (subservience/subordination).

In other words, by doing all things commercially in a false, legal persona (status, which is property of government), all actions done by national “citizens” are considered as being legally protected under international law, and, as the maxim of law goes, with protection comes subjection. You see, this maxim applies to both men and the persons (legal status) men pretend to act within, which inversely means that to have the protection of God (Natural rights), one must subject oneself only to the Law of Nature (God), never to what is legal (anti-God, anti-Nature). And so, having legal protection as “consumers” in commerce requires voluntary personhood (legal existence/status) and subjection to the false gods (magistrates) of government. The concept is not at all different, metaphorically speaking, as being either an angel or a demon. Both answer to their perspective gods and are bound by the law thereof. The personification of the angel guides men towards the Law of Nature while the demon (devil) drives men towards the big lie, the artificial aspect of false existence (citizenship in personhood) separated from Nature (God) and Its Law. The angel exists only in Nature (Reality) and may only influence and guide men towards Nature (God) and Its Law. But the demon exists only in fiction, in legal commerce, unable to do anything to men in Nature nor effect the Natural (God-given) rights of men (to do no harm) unless men can be deceived and tricked into entering into the legal, artificial realm (hell) via commercial contract, including citizenship to the legalist, secular nations. Nature (God) is Truth. Legalism is always a lie. One cannot have two opposing gods (masters), nor can one practice two opposing laws. One cannot claim the Natural rights emanating from Nature (God) while acting in an unnatural state of false existence (persona) and following only the law governing fiction. One cannot follow the Law of Nature (God) while also following its complete, intentional opposite, the law of men (legalism). And while the True intent of the concept of possessing the Natural (God-given) right of freedom of religion only exists in Nature, under God (as the practice only of the Law of Nature and exemption from legal, manmade sanctions), legalism only exists outside of and without God, without the Law of Nature. Legal law is a pretended exemption from the Law and Laws of Nature (God). It is really just satanism in disguise, for the meaning of the word satan is merely that which is adversarial to God (Nature/Truth) and Its Law. In legalism, the legal terminology (trickery) “freedom of religion” actually means freedom from religion, or in other words, freedom from Nature (God) and Its Law. All legal, commercial law necessarily defies, opposes, and abandons what is Nature (God) and Its Law, for all legal persons, places, and things (nouns/names) are false. In Nature, all of Existence (Creation) is anonymous, nameless, and therefore carries no mark, no blemish, and no sign of legal property. Nothing in Nature is property of man. Only legal (artificial) persons, places, and things (names placed upon Reality) are property (creations of) men. And so, when the Law of Nature is transmuted, reconstituted, and thus perverted from Nature (God) into commercial (legal) code, and when men can be tricked into following this artificial code instead of the actual Law of Existence (God), then men carry the delusion that all of Nature, including themselves, are property of some commercial government corporation. Every tree, plant, animal, element, and living creature has been blemished with a legal name (noun/”thing”). Every geographical area of Nature (God) has been bestowed a legal name (noun) designating it a “place” or jurisdiction. And every man has been given an additional name (noun) and other marks that identify us all as some form of legal persona (noun/name). Therefore, through this word-trickery or word-majick of the legal language, all parts of Nature have been claimed as the property of mans creations, of artificial persons (corporations) created by the governments of men.

—=—

“The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie –
deliberate, contrived and dishonest – but the myth,
persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.
Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion
without the discomfort of thought.”

–John F. Kennedy

—=—

We have allowed hell on Earth to come into existence, and we follow its pretenders, its false gods (magistrates) and legal codes as its vassals in an open-air debtors prison. And we have been so far separated from our own Nature (God) by this mythos that even the idea of self-governing under the Law of God by claiming what is inherently ours, that is, our only actual God-given (Natural) right that is to do no harm, no longer exists as even a possibility, for to exist in and under the artifice of nations and legal law we must therefore cause continuous harm to one another. To get ahead one must, either unwittingly or with deceitful understanding, harm all others. To make money (mammon) one must charge usury and act in grocery (harm/evil). And to have wealth as “property” (in mammon) one must act according to the dictates of lust, of greed, and of purposeful antagonism toward the Law and Laws of Nature (God). Citizenship, by its artificial nature, is the seven deadly sins all tied up in one corporate employment to “the state.”

And that’s just what it is: employment. A citizenship is an employee of its government, an agent to its principal. And an employee has no choice. An employee must act the part he or she is playing. A citizenship of a nation (corporation) has no right and no authority to act under Gods (Nature’s) Law. Moral choice is against the legal law. Not moral thought, only the right to act on that moral thought is taken away. Let’s face it… the continuity of government depends solely on men not acting upon their moral conscious against it. And this is the very purpose behind the multitude of false religions married (incorporated) under the legal state – belief without acting on that belief. In other words, hypocrisy (simulation) at its worst.

It is the element of choice that Truly validates ones actions. Legalism takes away choice, and often forces us to do the opposite of what we would otherwise choose to do. Choice is an illusion while we are plugged-in to The Matrix (legal simulation).

The following cannot be feigned or forced by legal sanction. They must come from the soul. They must come from the conscious mind of men, not as a bylaw of a corporation through fictional persons in simulation. For these are “family values” not corporate rules.

Lust is defeated by self-control, that is, self-government, chastity.

Gluttony is defeated by temperance, in serving others before ourselves.

Greed is cured by charity in all things, by putting the needs of others before ourselves.

Sloth is ceased when one has zeal, a zest and respect for all life, and diligence toward the needs of others.

Wrath, as anger toward another, is defeated by patience, by empathetic understanding of the disposition of others.

Envy has no place when the desire to help others succeed is more powerful than the desire to defeat, compete, or otherwise supersede them.

And pride can hold no man’s ego when one stands always in perspective humility, instead standing always in the attitude of service to all men and all True Existence (Nature/God).

The legal person is all of these in one, by legal requirement and/or as a result of the legal code, causing lustful and self-serving (glutinous) behavior, creating greed as intention and sloth as consequence, where lawyers capitalize and promote wrathful thought for profit and gain, playing perfectly into the resultant envy promoted by entertainment, advertising, and educational institutions, all packaged up in a fervent, national pride that necessarily excludes all others in the world not of the same pretended ethnicity (nationality). Personhood is legalized sin. Personhood is spiritual death.

The poker player would never follow these self-evident Laws of Nature (God), and neither can the citizenship of the nations of mammon. To succeed in mammon, all of these must be put aside to make room for evil intent, coveting after the false god of money.

Aristotle, who apparently penned the Nicomachean Ethics, expounds on what is the nature of actions in volunteerism, what is involuntary, and what he calls the non-voluntary aspects of the dualistic nature of these behaviors, which generally reflect the Law of Nature (God) as virtue (need) and the legal, commercial drive as the excess (desire/want) and/or deficiency that is expressed by a lack thereof in each virtue. Listed below, the “mean” category signifies a natural, reasonable balance between the excess and the deficiency. Of course, the legal system as commerce seeks to exploit the excess and the deficiency of moral character, just as one would expect from the demons of legalism, of those who seek to gain and promote the purely secular, legal ideal and lifestyle of their own version of “freedom of religion,” legally meaning freedom from the Law of God (Nature), legally licensed freedom from personal responsibility towards other men and from self-government (self-control under the moral Law). What is a legal version is never the same and always opposed to that which it simulates in hypocrisy.

Here I have listed these ethical principles along with the Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language definition of each term, which also reflects the same moral ethic in Biblical terms. When reading these, it must be from the perspective that each extreme represents the two trays of a scale, whereupon that scale tips in the favor of spirituality under God (the Law of Nature) and its opposing force of secularism under legalism (fallacious logic as the law of men). Yet too much of even the spiritually minded concept may cause men to act just as foolishly as the secularist extreme of that scale. It is balance we seek, not perfection. And this balance is self-governance under God’s Law (of Nature).  However, do not be fooled by the notion that legalism offers a counter-balance to perfection. That is not its design. Its design is to tip the scale in only one direction at all times, while simulating a religious foundation of moral equivalence and manifest destiny. This is a lie told by the king of lies, by men seeking power through the destruction of your ability to self-govern, and by taking you away from God (Nature) through false denominations (empty names) of the false doctrines of corporate religion. In other words, legalism is designed to keep you at all times spiritually unbalanced. All of these expressive traits, again, are based on choice. Legalism offers no choice, while the Law of God relies only on your choice to follow It or turn away from it towards the artificial construct of a legalistic lifestyle in spiritual death.

–=–

COURAGE – noun – [Latin, the heart.] Bravery; intrepidity; that quality of mind which enables men to encounter danger and difficulties with firmness, or without fear or depression of spirits; valor; boldness; resolution. It is a constituent part of fortitude; but fortitude implies patience to bear continued suffering. Courage that grows from constitution, often forsakes a man when he has occasion for it; courage which arises from a sense of duty, acts in a uniform manner. Be strong and of good courage Deuteronomy 31:6. (Websters1828)

Concerned with Mean Excess Deficiency
fear (phobos) Courage (andreia): mean in fear and confidence First Type. Foolhardy or excessive fearlessness; is one who over indulges in fearful activities. Cowardly (deilos): exceeds in fear and is deficient in confidence
confidence (thrasos) Second Type. Rash (thrasus): exceeds in confidence

–=–

TEMPERANCE – noun – [Latin temperantia, from temper.] 1. Moderation; particularly, habitual moderation in regard to the indulgence of the natural appetites and passions; restrained or moderate indulgence; as temperance in eating and drinking; temperance in the indulgence of joy or mirth. Temperance in eating and drinking is opposed to gluttony and drunkenness, and in other indulgences, to excess. 2. Patience; calmness; sedateness; moderation of passion. He calm’d his wrath with goodly temperance. [Unusual](Websters1828)

Concerned with Mean Excess Deficiency
pleasure (hēdonē)
and pain (lupē)
Temperance (sōphrosunē) Profligacy, dissipation, etc. (akolasia) scarcely occurs, but we may call it Insensible (including a lack of empathy, happiness from doing harm)(anaisthētos)

–=–

LIBERALITY – noun – [Latin liberalitas. See Liberal.] 1. Munificence; bounty. That liberality is but cast away, which makes us borrow what we cannot pay. 2. A particular act of generosity; a donation; a gratuity. In this sense, it has the plural number. A prudent man is not impoverished by his liberalities. 3. Largeness of mind; catholicism (universalism); that comprehensiveness of mind which includes other interests beside its own, and duly estimates in its decisions the value or importance of each. It is evidence of a noble mind to judge of men and things with liberality. Many treat the gospel with indifference under the name of liberality. 4. Candor; impartiality. (Websters1828)

Concerned with Mean Excess Deficiency
giving and getting (smaller amounts of) money liberality (Rackham),
generosity (Sachs) (eleutheriotēs)
prodigality (Rackham),
wastefulness (Sachs) (asōtia)
meanness (Rackham), stinginess (Sachs) (aneleutheria)

–=–

MAGNIFICENCE – noun – [Latin magnificentia.] Grandeur of appearance; greatness and splendor of show or state; as the magnificence of a palace or of a procession; the magnificence of a Roman triumph. (Websters1828)

Concerned with Mean Excess Deficiency
giving and getting greater things Magnificence (megaloprepeia) Tastelessness (apeirokalia) or Vulgarity (banausia) Paltriness (Rackham), Chintziness (Sachs) (mikroprepeia)

–=–

MAGNANIM’ITY – noun – [Latin magnanimitas; magnus, great, and animus, mind.] Greatness of mind; that elevation or dignity of soul, which encounters danger and trouble with tranquillity and firmness, which raises the possessor above revenge, and makes him delight in acts of benevolence, which makes him disdain injustice and meanness, and prompts him to sacrifice personal ease, interest and safety for the accomplishment of useful and noble objects. (Websters1828)

Concerned with Mean Excess Deficiency
great honor (timē) and dishonor Greatness of Soul (megalopsuchia)
(Traditional translation “magnanimity”. Sometimes “pride”.)
Vanity (chaunotēs) Smallness of Soul (self-hatred)(mikropsuchia)

–=–

AMBITION – noun – [Latin ambitio, from ambio, to go about, or to seek by making interest, of amb, about, and eo, to go. See Ambages. This word had its origin in the practice of Roman candidates for office, who went about the city to solicit votes.] A desire of preferment, or of honor; a desire of excellence or superiority. It is used in a good sense; as, emulation may spring from a laudable ambition. It denotes also an inordinate desire of power, or eminence, often accompanied with illegal means to obtain the object. It is sometimes followed by of; as, a man has an ambition of wit. Milton has used the word in the Latin sense of going about, or attempting; but this sense is hardly legitimate. (Websters1828)

Concerned with Mean Excess Deficiency
lesser honor (timē) and dishonor no special term in ancient Greek for the right amount of ambition Over-ambitiousness) (philotimos) lack of ambition (aphilotimos)

–=–

GENTLENESS noun – [See Gentle.] Dignity of birth. [Little used.] 1. Genteel behavior. 2. Softness of manners; mildness of temper; sweetness of disposition; meekness. The fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, long suffering, gentlenessgoodness, faith. Galatians 5:223. Kindness; benevolence. 4. Tenderness; mild treatment. (Websters1828)

Concerned with Mean Excess Deficiency
anger (orgē) Gentleness (praotēs) Irascibility (Rackham), Irritability (Sachs) (orgilotēs) Spiritlessness (aorgẽsia)

–=–

FRIENDLINESS – noun – 1. A disposition to friendship; friendly disposition. 2. Exertion of benevolence or kindness. (Websters1828)

Concerned with Mean Excess Deficiency
general pleasantness in life Friendliness (something like philia) First Type. obsequious (areskos), if for no purpose quarrelsome (duseris) and surly (duskolos) (contrarian)
Second type. flatterer (kolax), if for own advantage

–=–

TRUTHFUL – adjective – Full of truth. (Websters1828)

TRUTH – noun – 1. Conformity to fact or reality; exact accordance with that which is, or has been, or shall be. The truth of history constitutes its whole value. We rely on the truth of the scriptural prophecies. My mouth shall speak truth. Proverbs 8:7. Sanctify them through thy truth; thy word is truth. John 17:172. True state of facts or things. The duty of a court of justice is to discover the truth. Witnesses are sworn to declare the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth 3. Conformity of words to thoughts, which is called moral truth. Shall truth fail to keep her word? 4. Veracity; purity from falsehood; practice of speaking truth; habitual disposition to speak truth; as when we say, a man is a man of truth. 5. Correct opinion. 6. Fidelity; constancy. The thoughts of past pleasure and truth. 7. Honesty; virtue. It must appear, That malice bears down truth. 8. Exactness; conformity to rule. Plows, to go true, depend much on the truth of the iron work. [Not in use.] 9. Real fact of just principle; real state of things. There are innumerable truths with which we are not acquainted. 10. Sincerity… 13. It is sometimes used by way of concession… That is, it is a truth; what you have said, I admit to be true. In truth in reality; in fact. Of a truth in reality; certainly. To do truth is to practice what God commands. John 3. (Websters1828)

Concerned with Mean Excess Deficiency
truth (alēthēs) Truthfulness (alētheia) Boastfulness: pretense as exaggeration (alazoneia) Self-deprecation: pretense as understatement (eironia, same word as “irony“)

–=–

WITTY – adjective – [from wit.] 1. Possessed of wit; full of wit; as a witty poet. 2. Judicious; ingenious; inventive. 3. Sarcastic; full of taunts. (Websters1828)

WIT – verb intransitive – [G., to know. See Wise.] To know. This verb is used only in the infinitive, to wit namely, that is to say. [Latin] – noun [See the verb and Wise.] 1. Primarily, the intellect; the understanding or mental powers. Will puts in practice what the wit deviseth. For wit and power their last endeavors bend to outshine each other. 2. The association of ideas in a manner natural, but unusual and striking, so as to produce surprise joined with pleasure. wit is defined. What oft was thought, but neer so well expressed. Wit consists in assembling and putting together with quickness, ideas in which can be found resemblance and congruity, by which to make up pleasant pictures and agreeable visions in the fancy. Wit consists chiefly in joining things by distant and fanciful relations, which surprise us because they are unexpected. Wit is a propriety of thoughts and words; or in other terms, thoughts and words elegantly adapted to the subject. 3. The faculty of associating ideas in a new and unexpected manner. 4. A man of genius; as, the age of Addison abounded with wits. A wit herself, Amelia weds a wit. 5. A man of fancy or wit. Intemperate wits will spare neither friend nor foe. 6. Sense; judgment. He wants not wit the danger to decline. 7. Faculty of the mind. 8. Wits, in the plural, soundness of mind; intellect not disordered; sound mind. No man in his wits would venture on such an expedition. Have you lost your wits? Is he out of his wits? 9. Power of invention; contrivance; ingenuity. He was at his wits end. (Websters1828)

CHARMING – participle present tense – 1. Using charms; enchanting. 2. adjective – Pleasing in the highest degree; delighting. Music is but an elegant and charming species of elocution. (Websters1828)

CHARM – noun – 1. Words, characters or other things imagined to possess some occult or unintelligible power; hence, a magic power or spell, by which with the supposed assistance of the devil, witches and sorcerers have been supposed to do wonderful things. Spell; enchantment. Hence, 2. That which has power to subdue opposition, and gain the affections; that which can please irresistible; that which delights and attracts the heart; generally in the plural. The smiles of nature and the charms of art. Good humor only teaches charms to last.  verb transitive – 1. To subdue or control by incantation or secret influence. I will send serpents among you – which will not be charmed. Jeremiah 8:172. To subdue by secret power, especially by that which pleases and delights the mind; to allay, or appease. Music the fiercest grief can charm. 3. To give exquisite pleasure to the mind or senses; to delight. We were charmed with the conversation. The aerial songster charms us with her melodious notes. 4. To fortify with charms against evil. I have a charmed life, which must not yield. 5. To make powerful by charms. 6. To summon by incantation. 7. To temper agreeably. – verb intransitive – To sound harmonically. (Websters1828)

Concerned with Mean Excess Deficiency
pleasantness and social amusement Wittiness (Rackham)

Charming (Sachs) (eutrapelos)

Buffoonery (bõmolochia) Boorishness (bõmolochos)

–=–

For further outline and elaboration of these ten books containing these virtues and their excess or deficiency from neutrality (middle, mean, balanced state), see the wiki article, here:

Link–> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicomachean_Ethics

–=–

It is easy to confuse these terms with their legal opposites, word magic that is designed to simulate the form without the substance, to pretend good while acting badly. As an example, the legal system bestows the legal (false), flattering title of “honor” upon politicians and judges, as well as titles of supposed (pretended) nobility. One need not do anything special to be granted the flattering title of nobility, one may simply be born into it. Or, one may be hired on to the government corporations and be given such a legal title, which is a specifically defined term of art that has nothing to do with acting in honor in any way. This simulation (hypocrisy) is the nature of The Matrix story and movie franchise — a society so enamored in false, flattering titles that not one of us acts according to the title we pretend to bear. For while the words simulation and hypocrisy bear (carry) the same meaning, they are the products of very different intents. Hypocrisy is committed by a man that knows the Law of God (Nature) and continues knowingly and thus consciously to break that Law. But society today is in simulation, not hypocrisy. Simulation is committed by a man that does not know the Law of God except by name (form without substance), confused by legalism and false doctrine of state-sponsored religions, and therefore acts unknowingly and unconsciously to break the Law of God (Nature).

Which is worse? Why hypocrisy, of course, knowingly breaking the Law of Nature (God).

Which is more destructive? That would be simulation, for a simulator knows and acknowledges not his own hypocrisy, being inculturated and brainwashed by secular logic (legalism) and thus tricked into contract with the devils (attorneys/agents) of government – injured (brought into legal law) and submitted to a spiritually dead existence absent from Source (Nature). One that is ignorant, though this be no excuse, cannot be called a hypocrite. But he can be called evil, pernicious, and wanting of moral rectitude, as much as any farm animal might be labeled. For both exist in their own matrix simulation, an existence completely separate from Nature (Reality). One thing, however, is certainly clear… The ignorant simulators must be governed, for they cannot govern themselves if they do not know the Law of Nature (God). Trying to self-govern without God, without Logos (Christ, the Word of God personified), is like entering into a battle without a sword or shield. The piercing effect of legalism and mammon corrupts the empty mind, the mind devoid of knowledge. And we are certainly a people destroyed by our disgusting and purposeful lack of knowledge, our active ignorance.

(Author’s note: I just revealed the subject outline of my next book.)

It must be said that not any one of these virtues listed above can be obtained without the others. Each is like a check and balance upon which the others depend. For instance, one might be very witty and yet, without empathy, that is, without having temperance over ones words or actions, ones wit will certainly do harm to another or to oneself (self-deprecation). This dispensation of virtue is akin to having a shield against those seven deadly sins that the legal system thrives upon and invokes in each of us through its artificial matrix code. And so the worst of men rise to the top while the best of us are cowed and prevented from practicing this religious Law of virtuous ethics as religious men (non-persons). To be clear, the Law of Nature (God) is illegal in the legal system of men, for that is the purpose of having freedom from (of) religion, which means a state of possessing legal freedom from moral Law. Following the Law of God religiously is not a religion, it is conscious action and a fear of hypocrisy. The religions of men in no way require any man to follow the Law of God, and in fact require every man to break with God’s Law, the Law of Nature, in order to join and follow whatever false doctrine that “church” has printed, incorporated, and made legal (anti-God). Religion is steeped in and dependent on simulation and hypocrisy, for all its members and clergy must necessarily fall into one of these categories.

It is no irony that by doing no harm one therefore rises above and takes away all power of the legal governments of men, leaving the dealer (government) of the game without dependent, morally corrupted customers, without support, without players (citizen employees) in its organized, extortive, commercial business practices. A king, a government, and a poker dealer (tax collector) are useless and powerless actors without the multitude of weak-minded men paying them tribute by participating in their legal, permissive, monopolistic games so as to be harmful and be harmed as a defunct (spiritually dead), default lifestyle. Therefore, the legal system and its devilish law allows for, protects, and very much promotes injury and harm. To injure literally means to bring someone, some place, or some thing into law, and this usually means harm must be done to that legal (artificial) person (status), place (corporation), or thing (property). Though these are merely fictions of law (nouns/names), these pretended titles play an intricate role in this process, for they are all patented creations and property of government. The creator controls, as their well-established, ancient, legal maxim of law dictates. In other words, God controls Nature (including man) and Its Law, while governments control fiction (including the legal persons, places, and things of men) and the legal law that controls them. Through the fictional person, the man is controlled. Within the fictional place (legal jurisdiction of a municipal corporation) the person is governed (administrated). And through every false, legal claim of any thing as “property” by the fictional legal person in the fictional legal place, the man is therefore claiming that he or she holds “title” through some creation (persona) of government, and therefore the law of persons, places, and things is the highest – a false law held higher than Nature’s (God’s) Law. Ultimately this means that anyone that violates or trespasses upon that lie of fictionally entitled property must be punished, that is, harmed through extortion and pain. Forgiveness is not tolerated by we that justify, tolerate, and even worship patriotically this legal system, pretending God’s realm of Nature no longer exists when covered by a fictional, legal “property” line (artificial border) — that the Law of God’s Nature is equally defeated within that artificial boundary of legalism. Therefore, no moral action will be tolerated from any man because it’s illegal (intolerable) for a man bearing (using) a legal person (legal status) under and controlled (owned) by government to practice any form of True religious freedom (bound under moral, unwritten Law). What is legally written remains instead the foundational lie in which we trust.

A person (legal status) exists only in the legal fiction system (a fictional simulation created through legal code words), no differently than a Monopoly game game-piece only has power and status in the Monopoly game or a pawn or knight only has status as a pawn in the game of chess, being a useless trinket in Truth, that is, in Nature (under God), and having power only through the permissive (licensed) fiction that is man’s legal system of law. And so a man acting as/in legal persona (false character) can only act according to the law of persons, the law of the legal, commercial game, never the spiritual, moral Law of Nature (God). In other words, a man must tolerate everything that the government’s legal system of law requires its fictional persons (property) to tolerate, while inversely showing forced, equal, collective intolerance towards whatever government requires and considers as legally intolerable. Morals, values, spirituality, and just outright common sense are intolerable in any legal system. Why? Because these actions (not just thoughts) cannot be governed through legal means, only suppressed through rules attached to this persona (status in society). Only harm can be legally governed. And like a parasite, a vampiric ghoul, government capitalizes upon and taxes every instance of harm we do to one another, even going so far as to fill our heads with Hollywood (deceitful) entertainment that constantly promotes and features as “reality television” a host of paid, low-level, professional liars (actors) fulfilling quite scripted acts of competition and harm.

This is no game, this is the way of Nature (Jehovah). This is our actual default. Only the legal fiction prevents us from living Truly amongst one another in Love and Charity. And that fiction was created purposefully to destroy our spiritual release, our ability to Love and cherish each other as Real men, as Creations of God (Nature), entraining, educating, and tricking us into playing instead their legal game of monopolies (nations) by their artifices and false laws.

If this still doesn’t make sense, try and imagine a moral Monopoly or chess game for a moment, where the Highest rule of the game is to do no harm to any other player (man) or to the earth (Nature), where all “places” are only property of God and no other. Imagine playing Monopoly without money, without a banker (false god). Imagine if the dice had no power to move you and force you to harm (trespass) because you had no fictional character that, by the artificial (legal/man-made) law of that game, could control you through contract, bond, violence, and surety. Imagine having the Natural right and ability to travel through each pretended square of land because no legal system prevented it, and because the Law of the game is to do no harm, to forgive us our trespasses, and to love and respect one another as our neighbor and as we would expect to have done to ourselves? While this is the default Law of Nature, or in other words, what exists without the artifices of legal properties (persons, places, and things), it is only possible by conscious application (choice). It is only possible without temptation towards mammon (money and false valuation of what is Real as a fiction/name in commerce). It is only possible by men able to govern their own minds and actions, by men that hold the Highest Law not merely as a pretended belief system (religion) under a false corporate title like “Christian,” but as a lifestyle put into action at every moment of every new day. What games would we play if there was no competition? What wonders could we accomplish? What level of True Love could we experience?

Unfortunately, these questions cannot be answered while men are contracted with the dis-ease of legal personhood (status) under a false law, while inside the simulation of the legal matrix code and while entranced by the artifice of false, legally incorporated religions (belief without action). For the member of any religion is merely a citizen thereof, no different than that of a citizen of any nation, unable to ever act upon any moral law purveyed within that religion because that religion is a legal corporation bound wholly under legal law (IRS code), and the man attending that religious ceremony (game) is a legal citizen under legal (anti-God, anti-Nature) law. He that pretends, acts, and preaches falsely has no place in God’s Nature (Creation). The chess piece has no power except upon the chess board. The cartoon only exists in the cartoon realm. One cannot be a follower of the Law of God (exemplified in the story of Jesus Christ, the Law personified) and also pretend to be a legal person bound under legal law (false, antichrist doctrine). Each religion is a Monopoly board of its own, allowing empty belief in idols but preventing the ability of men to practice any moral actions as Law without license and permission from government. This false charity from religions can only serve to keep the poor in poverty, to fill the neglected belly of the hungry temporarily, without satisfaction, and provide only the illusion of shelter and love not as a duty to God, but as a gesture of empty, corporate greed (lust). Any welfare system provided by the corporate church serves only to support poverty, hunger, and homelessness, no less than the welfare system of the legal, corporate state serves only the continued base poverty level of its recipients. For money-based, corporate charity bound in anti-God legalism can never cure the ills of a society that worships and hoards the empty promise of money as its artificial god.

Government is only words on paper, and these words (false laws) are used by actors (politicians, police, etc.) in artificially flattering titles as justification to harm and injure the men who respect and therefore tolerate them as if their titles and legally licensed powers thereof are part of reality. This invisible badge of moral corruption, a public scarlet letter of moral incorrigibility called personhood (legalized adultery) and national US citizenship is expressed every time that status (legal, artificial persona) is invoked through identity (pretended sameness as a fictional character/name), such as showing a driver’s license or using a social security number. The law applies only to the person (fictional status), but the man acting in person is in a permanent state of injury (bound under legal law and sanction) by continued, assumed, permanent use (expression) of that persona (status) and the protection it tacitly imposes, being in bond and surety as a consequence of using another’s (government’s) property. Legal protectionism, that is, giving up liberty for security, replacing the choice of self-government with a legalistic prison in debt, is never a good thing.

And now, suddenly, the purpose of Thomas Jefferson’s quote above can be clearly understood. Your rulers use the premise of this quote against you, by causing you to abandon your natural (“God-given”) rights in exchange for their contracted dis-ease of legal, artificial rights. The devil (evil genius/attorneys) can only effect you when you get into contract with it. Legalism is intolerable to innocence. Satan requires harm be done so that its anti-God legalist law may govern and administrate that harm. With time or with money (which are the same thing), we all pay in the end.

Governments only have power over men that are weak-minded, ignorant, and warlike, men that cannot govern themselves, men that deny their own power and existence under God (in Nature/Reality). This unnatural state of being is purely a learned, societal behavior fomented on the “public” at large, for one cannot control (govern) he that is self-governing, unless that government first steals that man’s spiritual release and ability to practice any form of moral (unwritten, self-evident) Law. This is the absolute power behind the legal systems of men, a distinct lack of recognition and respect of the Law of Nature, the Law of God, and therefore the “God-given Rights” so often spoken about by the men that create governments. However, while they are happy to reserve these rights for themselves, the rest of us must be made to deny them and harm each other as a customary, common (vulgar) lifestyle in order that we may be ruled by the legalistic (man-made) rules of harm. We thrive on injury, because only through injury may we invoke and utilize the legal system. Without harm, it has no purpose. It cannot exist in a charitable society. It cannot thrive when forgiveness is the law. And it cannot control us unless we treat each other without love, as if we are not each other’s neighbors to love as we love ourselves. When our actions are no longer answerable only to Jehovah but to men pretending to be gods (magistrates/judges), then we no longer have Natural (God-given) rights. The second we invoke the legal system and law of men, we abandon all that is of God (Nature, the Universe), all that is the benefit of living in and speaking at all times the Truth. For God is Truth and the keeper of It. In other words, if we act like Lawless (soulless) animals then we shall be treated like Lawless (soulless) animals.

Governments, however, are not Truth. Governments exist and subsist solely on lies, on their own fictional inventions, and according to their own law. We seem to forget that every government in existence is immune from its own system of law, standing in the legal title of self-proclaimed, artificial, pretended sovereignty over its own property, its own false creation, including the persons (status in society) we pretend to be. We are told that we are each individually sovereign and yet also somehow subject to government, a blatant misnomer bordering on paradox. A man of God has only one Sovereign and it is never himself, for to have Natural (God-given) rights is to recognize Nature, that is the Universe as all True and self-evident Existence as a whole, as man’s only God (Sovereign). Nature is the only Truth. Truth is God. God is Truth. All else is manmade, and what is manmade is never Truth, never part of God, never part of or governed by Nature and Its Law. Therefore, what is manmade, including what we call persons or citizenship, is a lie. A lie is always against Truth. A lie is always against God’s Law. Lies are never part of Nature, thus never part of God. In other words, Truth is self-evident, and so Truth is the keeper of Itself, for Truth is the Nature and Law of the Universe (Jehovah). Man is part of Nature (God), part of Truth, and ultimately governed by Truth (Nature and Its Law), and so nothing manmade can be said to be part of God, for nothing manmade is part of (originated from) Nature (the Source of Truth). This is the essential foundation of law. Words are never Truth, only form without substance and without self-evidence. The Word of God is the Law of Truth, the Law (Logos) is the Son of God (Truth). The Word is the Law is the Son… these words carry the same meaning and Source. Whenever Truth is spoken, this is the Word of God. That which emanates Truth is acting in or speaking the Word of God, and is acting as a son of God, for God (Jehovah) is Truth. And one can self-evidently only have one True Origin, one Source, one Sovereign (God). All others are false (respected lies). This understanding does not require a degree, or even an education. It needs no religion or money-hungry, lust-addicted priest. It is a fundamental, self-evident Truth. It is the foundation of all Law, for the legal law only exists as that which is opposed to Truth. Life is spiritual Truth. Legal fiction is spiritual death. All persons (legal status under government) are fictions of law. All persons are dead. Persons are not of God, not Created from Nature (Universal Source). Persons are words, form without substance. Persons are Soulless…

If you think this is religion, you are hopelessly lost in the throws of legally imposed, active ignorance… dazed, and confused by the firm and fast grip of your lovelorn lips upon the teat of the false, legal gods of government (mammon).

—=—

“There is nothing more frightening than active ignorance.”

—Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

—=—

“We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light.” 

―Plato

—=—

“There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that ‘my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.” 

―Issac Asimov 

—=—

“There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn’t true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true.” 

―Soren Kierkegaard

—=—

“We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.” 

―Benjamin Franklin

—=—

“The hardest thing to explain is the glaringly evident which everybody has decided not to see.” 

―Ayn Rand, The Fountainhead

—=—

“Five percent of the people think; 
ten percent of the people think they think; 
and the other eighty-five percent would rather die than think.” 

―Thomas A. Edison

—=—

“But you can’t make people listen.
They have to come round in their own time,
wondering what happened and why the world blew up around them…

―Ray Bradbury, Fahrenheit 451

—=—

“Being ignorant is not so much a shame, as being unwilling to learn.”

―Benjamin Franklin

—=—

“An age is called Dark, not because the light fails to shine, but because people refuse to see it.”

―James A. Michener

—=—

“To surrender to ignorance and call it God has always been premature, and it remains premature today. Faith is the great cop-out, the great excuse to evade the need to think and evaluate evidence. Faith is the belief in spite of, even perhaps because of, the lack of evidence.”

―Richard Dawkins

(Author’s Note: I do not adhere to Dawkins gibberish, and would give my left nut to “debate” him, that is, educate him and his hopeless cult-following on his fallacious rhetoric and active ignorance of the Bible story and purpose. But a Truth as this, spoken by any man, cannot be ignored lest one becomes ones own enemy. His words regard only empty, corporate religions and their flatteringly-titled followers, not the self-evidence of the Truths in the Bible. His whole pedestal relies on the “strawman argument” fallacy, arguing against the false gods/idolatry and empty images that corporate “Christians” and other religions believe faithfully without proof instead of correcting those false beliefs and instructing them in the Truth of the Bible. In this way, Dawkins is not a Truth-teller but an adversary to the Truth (God). Jehovah (God) is self-evident Truth, against which there is no debating, no versions, and is not to be confused with of defined or likened to false gods and idols. Jehovah is defined as self-Evidence, self-Existence, the Universe, Nature and Its Law, of which we are all undeniably part of in Oneness. The atheist can only exist because false religions exist. The atheist argument is only against some other man’s imagination, not the Bible Law read in proper context and understanding of the intent of its language and metaphor. Dawkins is the “fool” so often referred to therein, just as I was for believing his and other’s fallacious rhetoric instead of reading and committing to due diligence regarding the Bible. His comment above only applies to men tricked into believing the false, manmade doctrines and empty images of denominated, corporate, legalized religions, and has nothing to do with the Bible itself.)

—=—

Let us be clear that the story of Jesus Christ is a timeless (non-historical) story about the most intolerant dude I can think of, violently overturning the tables of the moneychangers and abhorring all men (fools) that acted and spoke against God’s Law, the Law of Nature, the self-evident Truth. Let us also be clear that Jesus Christ is the story of you, and me, the example of God’s Law, the Law of Nature we are to follow — haters of lies, artifice, and legal fiction, and intolerable to everything not of Truth (Jehovah). No one can possibly read the Bible as Law (doctrine) while at the same time thinking so-called “Christian” thoughts about the world (globalized, institutionalized, unspiritual secularism) around us. Christ tolerated no abhorrent behavior, constantly chastising and slyly convicting all “fools” and “hypocrites” that pretended (simulated), as many of us similarly do today, to be men of God (followers of God’s Law). Nothing in the Bible (Law) promotes tolerance. In fact, the very idea of tolerance is by its nature completely against the purpose of any and every system of law, save perhaps the corrupt legal systems of men that seek socialism, communism, and in general Orwellian despotism.

Tolerance is literally moral anarchy, that is, lawlessness to all sense of morality, and poisonous to any sort of spiritually driven values any people may collectively share — the very reason for creating a legitimate (Lawful) government. In other words, once the delusion of enforced, legalized tolerance (permission-based, protected, abhorrent behaviors and lifestyles) infiltrates what otherwise was “constituted” to be an otherwise intolerant society of men that base their participation in that society firstly on a Higher, unwritten, spiritually driven purpose, all hope of maintaining an unwritten, unspoken, unenforced moral order is diminished if not crushed, and such moral behavior is even outlawed by the legalist platform of protectionism (license) for bad behavior.

—=—

“…Shouldest thou help the ungodly, and love them that hate the LORD (Jehovah)? therefore is wrath upon thee from before the LORD (Jehovah)… Take heed what ye do: for ye judge not for man, but for the LORD (Jehovah), who is with you in the judgment… for there is no iniquity with the LORD our God, nor respect of persons, nor taking of gifts… Thus shall ye do in the fear of the LORD, faithfully, and with a perfect heart.”

–2 Chronicles 19:2

—=—

The natural (common/lower class) man is a spiritual monster. His heart is where his feet should be, fixed upon the earth; his heels are lifted up against heaven, which his heart should be set on. His face is towards hell; his back towards heaven. He loves what he should hate, and hates what he should love; joys in what he ought to mourn for, and mourns for what he ought to rejoice in; glories in his shame, and is ashamed of his glory; abhors what he should desire, and desires what he should abhor.”

—Thomas Boston, quoted from: ‘Augustus Toplady, Complete Works’

—=—

To tolerate the existence of evil in men is not the same as tolerating the evils emulated in their behavior. One is to act in charity and love to all men, to tolerate them in their ignorance and deprivation, but never to allow or justify it, and certainly not to love it. The verse above explains that much of the evil of men comes from their status in society, their person. The person acts not under God’s Law but under the government (mind control) of a false god (men acting as gods/magistrates). Love the man as God’s Creation, but never the fictional persona (mask) he pretends to be.

To legalize tolerance is to make lawful that which is intolerable. To legalize tolerance, that is, to force “citizens” to accept all creeds and lifestyles in false, forced legally sanctioned equality, is to abandon the Source of Law that would otherwise allow good men to fight against that evil. In every case throughout written history, this institutionalized tolerance has but one causal effect — to cause good, moral men to become intolerable to the secularized society created by the enforced tolerance thereof. He that refuses legalized, forced tolerance of that which is immoral must necessarily be labeled as intolerable. It is this phenomenon that we are witnessing in America today, and ultimately in all “first-world” nations around the world. It is this tolerance of evil, this bearing of false love for the deadly sins of men due to their false, legally protected persona, that is the antichrist spirit.

One example of this destructive toleration can be seen in what is called as “modern” or “impressionist” art. When the artist no longer paints the world according to its True beauty and wonder, no longer wishing to extend in his art the glory and harshness of Truth, and instead chooses to reinvent Reality (Creation) from his own palate of demented, alternative perspective or some drug-induced “impressionist” revisionism, we have the perfect example of the spiritual degradation that subsists through unrestricted tolerance, and indeed the protective admiration and promotion of tolerable immorality.

—=—

But it’s the consequences of such universally established tolerance in a legalist, secularized society that are the focus of this short essay. For with such a learned, propagandized, and subsequently violently enforced legalistic tolerance shrouded upon a once morally-driven people, whose spiritual foundation and standing in the Law of Nature (God) against what is otherwise intolerable has ultimately been cowed by such licensure of permissive, illicit behavior and idolatry — this once strong foundation of like-minded people must necessarily become intolerant even toward the expression of their own, natural, moral instinct. We must deny the Truth and accept what is false. Such toxic, societal (legal) tolerance causes immorality in the actions of all men regardless of their upbringing and dissuasiveness from their knowledge and baser instinct, causing a legally-induced, almost helpless automation of the man under the false law of forced permissiveness of all that is against reason, stultifying every “citizen” (employee/agent) into inaction and eventually into a shameful feeling of powerlessness, worthlessness, and helplessness as a normal state of mind.

Nineteen Eighty-Four (as Orwell presented) is not merely an inevitable future but a predictive programming of exactly what has incrementally been happening to us, here and now. Good men are afraid to stand up against such oppressive, fallacious public outcries and politically-driven catcalls as “anti-semitic” or “racist,” silenced by social justice campaigns designed to do nothing more than stifle any debate and suppress reasonable consideration. To those acting intolerably, those tolerating evils, their acts of non-toleration through the silencing of any moral opposition is golden. Once tolerance of evil becomes law, only then may evil reign, their actions governed strictly (without choice) by the legalist devils (attorneys) that protect and represent them. And, of course, this is all by design. For the very purpose for this word “racism,” a term and concept that simply cannot be found in older dictionaries or in societal history, is for the purposes of selective intolerance hidden behind the logical fallacy of the goodness of socialistically ingrained, universal tolerance.

 

—=—

So if all black people get organized as a group of flatteringly titled “black” people (an artificial “black” persona/mask/status), which must necessarily be non-white or any other skin-color, they can then collectively as “black” persons fight racism? But, wait a minute, isn’t that the definition of racism? Wasn’t that the model of America — to create a “white” (pure-blooded) country that enslaved “black” (tainted blood) persons of any skin color? Wasn’t America a bunch of “white” European persons (pure bloodline families) that came together in “solidarity” to form a country that necessarily excluded non-pure-blooded men no matter what the skin-color?

Is this race denial? Is it race shame? The strange thing is that this manipulative social justice movement has nothing at all to do with ending this left over, eugenically-driven racial hatred, that is, hatred between the so-called races, but rather to promote a hatred of the distinction of race itself, a sort of collective delusion of self-hatred and self-denial. In other words, we are being ingrained and inculturated to consider race (family) itself as intolerable — exactly what one would expect from a United Nations world government that wishes to replace the family unit with globalist, corporate feudalism and the state as parens patriae.

—=—

“The state has a wide range of power for limiting parental freedom and authority in things affecting the child’s welfare… In fact, the entire familial relationship involves the State.”

The primary control and custody of infants is with the government.”

“There is no wider area for the exercise of judicial discretion than that of providing for and protecting the best interests of children.”

“The court stands in the position of parens patria[e] of children.”

Parens patriae,” literally “parent of the country,” refers traditionally to role of state as sovereign and guardian of persons under legal disability.”

“Pursuant to the parens patriae doctrine, ‘the primary control and custody of infants is with the government, to be delegated, as of course, to their natural guardians and protectors, so long as such guardians are suitable persons to exercise it.’ ”

“In other words, the state is the father and mother of the child and the natural parents are not entitled to custody, except upon the state’s beneficent recognition that natural parents presumably will be the best of its citizens to delegate its custodial powers… ‘The law devolves the custody of infant children upon their parents, not so much upon the ground of natural right in the latter, as because the interests of the children, and the good of the public, will, as a general rule, be thereby promoted.’ 

–Prince, 321 U.S. at 167, 64 S.Ct. at 442, 88 L.Ed. 645. (SOURCE: FindLaw’s Appellate Court of Illinois case and opinions.) -and- MEADOWS v. MEADOWS, (Aug 2008), in the “Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama”?Tillman V. Roberts. 108 So. 62; Ex parte Handley, 460 So.2d 167 (Ala.1984). -and- –Ex parte Wright, 225 Ala. 220, 222, 142 So. 672, 674 (1932). See also Fletcher v. Preston, 226 Ala. 665, 148 So. 137 (1933); and Striplin v. Ware, 36 Ala. 87 (1860), -and- Ex parte Bayliss, 550 So.2d 986, 988 n. 1 (Ala.1989) (quoting Black’s Law Dictionary 1003 (5th ed.1979)). -and- Chandler v. Whatley, 238 Ala. 206, 208, 189 So. 751, 753 (1939) (quoting Striplin v. Ware, 36 Ala. at 89) (‘ ’). (SOURCE: FindLaw’s Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama case and opinions.)

—=—

Get it? The word public means corporation (artificial family) of lower class common men (goyim) acting in legal persona because of lack of knowledge and therefore inability to govern ourselves. The nation is a corporation, and the United Nations is a bunch of nations placed under the same matrix code. But what you might not know is that another word for corporation is FAMILY — as in surrogate parent under the doctrine of master and servant (also called as volunteerism). In the terms below, the word “pleasure” when used legally means legal use of a benefit, which implies the contractual relationship between person (agent) and the state (principal). So when your son takes a joy ride, it’s always considered corporate (family) business, and the head of the corporation (family) is the responsible party for any damages…

FAMILY GROUP – Within purview of the family car doctrine, is not confined to persons related to the owner, but includes members of the collective body of persons living in his household for whose convenience the car is maintained and who have authority to use it. The children of trust settlor including an adult son are members of the settlor’s “family group” for income tax purposes. (Black4)

FAMILY USE – That use ordinarily made by and suitable for the members of a household whether as individuals or collectively. The supply of water in a municipal corporation for family use includes the supply of jails, hospitals, almshouses, schools, and other municipal institutions; id. (Black4)

MEMBEROne of the persons constituting a family; a partnership, association, corporation, guild, etc. One of the persons constituting a court, a legislative assembly, etc. A part or organ of the animal body; especially a limb or other separate part. (Black4)

FAMILY PURPOSE DOCTRINE – A doctrine that the owner of a car, who gives it over to the use of his family and permits it to be operated by the members thereof, is liable for the injuries inflicted while being operated by a member of the family. The doctrine, that the owner of an automobile purchased or maintained for the pleasure of his family is liable for injuries inflicted by the machine while being used by the members of the family for their own pleasure. The doctrine imputes relationship of principal and agent where one maintains an automobile for pleasure or other use of member of his family. It is based on theory that each family member in using such car for own pleasure is carrying out the purpose for which it is furnished, and is the owner’s agent or servant. It is founded upon principles of agency or of master and servant. It is restricted to automobiles maintained by owner for comfort, pleasure, and convenience of members of his family. A father is not liable merely because he is head of family, but the one who owns or provides the automobile is liable. A wife may be held liable for the torts of her husband under the doctrine. Agency is the very genesis of the doctrine. Grandmother standing in loco parentis to grandson was liable under the doctrine for grandson’s negligent operation of her automobile. Where wife owned automobile, husband was not liable under “family purpose doctrine,” for minor son’s negligent operation of the automobile, notwithstanding husband paid part of gasoline and garage bills… (Black4)

FAMILY CAR DOCTRINE – The doctrine rests upon the basis that the automobile is furnished by the husband in his individual capacity and as common-law head of the family for the use of the family, and not as the agent of the community. It rests on theory that operator is husband’s agent and runs automobile in husband’sbusiness”; that wife is husband’s agent in carrying out one of the purposes for which the automobile is purchased and owned. Under the doctrine, a father furnishing automobile for pleasure and convenience of family makes the use of automobile by family his business and any member of family driving automobile with father’s express or implied consent is the father’s agent and the father is liable for the member’s negligence. See, also, Family Automobile Doctrine and Family Purpose Doctrine. (Black4)

FAMILY AUTOMOBILE DOCTRINE – The doctrine is that one who owns and maintains an automobile for the general use of his household makes use of automobile for such purposes a part of his business so that any member using automobile for those purposes under general authority to do so becomes his representative, for whose negligence he is responsible. It is an extension of the principle of respondeat superior to the relation created by operation of family use automobile. See, also, Family Car Doctrine and Family Purpose Doctrine. It is based on theory that members of family were engaged in a joint enterprise or that child was agent of parents. If an automobile is owned and maintained by a family corporation for general use of a family, such as that of corporation’s manager and one of its principal stockholders, corporation may be held liable under thefamily automobile doctrineto third parties. (Black4)

FAMILY CARAutomobile used to send owner’s children to school was “family car.” (Black4)

—=—

Yes, dropping the kids off at school in the “family car” is considered an act (benefit) of commerce, done in legal persona (citizenship), as the head of or agent (member) of a legal family of US persons (a legal marriage is the incorporation of two fictional, legal persons that are both property of the state). This is the family (artificially ethnic race) of the United States, all 300+ million of us — a family (corporation) born (birthed) without love and borne (carried) through great deceit and deception. The state (national district) is the father of its national citizenships.

And now you know why the scoundrels that started the United States were called as its “fathers” (false gods), and why the Bible insists that no man call any other but Jehovah (God) as “father.”

This artificial, national family (incorporation of persons) represents a politically-driven destruction of the recognition and proudness of heritage, family history, and age-old values. It’s what one might call the New World Order (international secularism), where all men identify as fictional (legal) persons and all such fictional persons are property (corporate employees called legally as sons and daughters) of the nation (family corporation).

The false paradigm we call as racism, or what is the modernly naked, left-over, legalistic “race” classifications of the original eugenics movement used without understanding today and therefore without reason or logic behind it, as a recognition of race detached from any actual family (bloodline/heraldic) considerations, being a mostly modern construct created by Darwin’s evolutionary charting of nonsensical traits and size variations of human skulls and intelligence quotients, indeed has an organized, sinister, secular-humanist goal that is not the imaginary, fairy-tail color-blindness promoted through televised hatred and logical fallacy we see and hear all over the “news” and as entertainment on social media. Rather, this so-called racism is a being served up as a deliciously delusional blindness to reality, to the beautiful Truth of Nature, as an institutionalized arrogance and indifference to God’s Design. Race (family) has nothing to do with it, except for the intention to destroy the True meaning of that word race in the minds of men, until it is unrecognizable as a good thing… or even acknowledgeable in public and political forums as a self-evident Truth.

In case you haven’t put the pieces together yet, legal “equality” is the direct opposite of race (family). In other words, equality = incorporation. Equality is necessary to destroy actual race, that is, to destroy the Real (bloodline) family unit, in order to cause all men to identify as legal entities instead of men of God (Nature), as equalized and thus normalized national citizens — artificial sons and daughters (persons) of the nation. This methodical averaging of the brain activity of children is much like the equalizer on a sound board or stereo, where all the frequency quotients can be flattened to the same level of unique output (zero), while certain individually wanted or preferred tones or traits can be notched up to acquire the desired effect. Before certain political groups or classes can be given more rights than all the other equally normalized citizenships, the group as a whole must be made to believe they are equal, even to the point of being required to hide or not to express those differences, be they knowledge or skill-based. Once the population is flattened, only then can a minority group be made to stand out and become unequal. There is no equality without inequity, for without that which is unequal to that which is forcibly declared and entrained to be equal there would be nothing to compare said label of equality to. In other words, to create a middle or lower class there must be a higher class, lest there be nothing to be lower than.

Public school, for instance, teaches all kids equally, so that no one kid can get ahead of the rest without reprimand. One size fits all — though completely and provably a failure of logic — is the delusional paradigm of this modern, humanist pedagogy. Humanism is the false religion of the atheist, the anarchist, the spiritually dead. The big bang is the religion of science. The singularity is the religion of the futurist, who’s spirit is devoid of and opposed to his own Source. Each wants to play god in a different way, and the education system is there to further the cause of this man-as-god mind-set. And through this institutionalization of legal (artificial) equality not of men but of legal, fictional (bloodless) persons in law, the foundation is laid to cause total inequity through such institutions as civil rights, that is, special rights for special groups that suddenly aren’t in any way equal anymore to the rest of the common, legalistic family. And so the values we associate with family (race) now come from the corporation nation, not the traditional values of our True family (race). In the end, the man that through legal personhood accepts artificial, legal equality with another man’s projected legal persona can never again claim God-given, Natural rights. For the source of the legal person is not God, not Nature, and no man may commune with God when acting in a lie, when acting in legal (anti-God) persona (mask). There is only one actual definition of the legal term equality, which is that all persons of the state stand with a required and equal punishment under the law. One that acts in equality instead of in True equity deserves not equity from others, for equity requires moral choice, and acting upon moral choice in the legal (immoral) realm is illegal.

And yet, in what seems a paradox, everywhere you look in Hollywood and its governmentally sponsored and controlled viral outlets of news and entertainment media one can find only the most blatant of race-baiting, and more specifically the demonization of any modicum of “white” racial, that is, cultural ethnicity and identity. Even so-called “white” people are learning to hate themselves for being “white,” though I’ve never actually met a “white person” in my life, since legal persons are only fictions of law. If Hollywood is to be believed in its re-writing and revisionist defeat of actual history through entertainment, it was the “black” people that freed the slaves, and “white” slavery didn’t even exist, let alone the modern black-on-black slave trade in Africa and the sex-trafficking of every skin-color happening right now.

Again, racism isn’t in dictionaries before the 1900’s. Why? Because before this artificial construct of racism there was only race. You see, race means family. Bloodlines, not skin color. That which was traditionally racially-motivated was in fact family-motivated. Corporations and/or governments (States) were historically created to protect the prosperity of bloodlines of families, their family (racial) inheritance, which by their very design in Nature are, as a generalization, often similar in skin-color. Race is indeed a generic term until it is purposefully, intentionally applied to some thing.

Webster defined it as it was in 1828:

RACE – noun – [Latin radix and radius having the same original. This word coincides in origin with rod, ray, radiate, etc.] 1. The lineage of a family, or continued series of descendants from a parent who is called the stock. A race is the series of descendants indefinitely. Thus all mankind are called the race of Adam; the Israelites are of the race of Abraham and Jacob. Thus we speak of a race of kings, the race of Clovis or Charlemagne; a race of nobles, etc. Hence the long race of Alban fathers come. 2. A generation; a family of descendants. A race of youthful and unhandled colts. 3. A particular breed; as a race of mules; a race of horses; a race of sheep. Of such a race no matter who is king. 4. A root; as race-ginger, ginger in the root or not pulverized. 5. A particular strength or taste of wine; a kind of tartness… (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary Of The English Language)

RACISM/RACIST – ??? – Sorry, those terms haven’t been created by the communists yet.

—=—

Should we stop referring to the color of a “Yellow Lab” because the “Black Lab” might be offended by the Truth of the color of its fur?

Should we stop distinguishing bell peppers by their color because they all taste the same?

Racism is not specifically defined in this 1828 dictionary because in the minds of men of old there was no such thing. There was only family, cousins, genealogy, heraldry, and the fact that whole countries and cultures were set up (incorporated) and based therefore on these blood-based “family values” across the world. And they still are. America was certainly no exception to this rule, though perhaps the first family to be intentionally overcome (planned) by its own immigration policies in order to create the notion of a new global world (secular humanist) order. It is certainly not a “racist” action to attempt to protect ones own moral fabric of society created from the like-mindedness of a family (race) of men from the influence and degradation caused by the acceptance and toleration of different races (family bloodlines) that have differing or even completely opposing family values, religious notions, and moral codes. Yet to call men of moral character based on such racial (family) tradition as “racist,” that is, those that wish to preserve the very ideals of the foundation and reason behind the original forming of a political body (State), can only be labeled as exactly what it is — intolerance. Today’s modern construct of so-called “racism” is a weapon of purely political motivation, used vehemently and ironically without prejudice to foment the intolerance of Real family so as to make the “State” the father, the head of the corporation (artificial, surrogate, legal family), and especially the destruction of such traditional family (race-based) values. To destroy a society, a culture, and ultimately the law and ability of a blood-related private people to enjoy the benefits of family and Natural liberty based on moral, self-Evident Law, one only need to project the active ignorance of Eugenic race bias into the common, dumbed-down population base so that they turn against one another, so that every neighbor is thine enemy, a competitor, and a threat to some empty idol of the god of skin-color and mammon. Ultimately, the goal of the men behind these eugenic ideals is to impose a universal, legally induced (figurative/artificial) persona of corruption of blood in all men regardless of skin-color, or what the constitution calls as “attainder,” and therefore to establish a global citizenship that requires the taking away of liberty and the power to self-govern through surrender to one of many corporation nations (the voluntary taking of the mixed, legal surname over the Christian name to render a legal persona). He that cannot show his bloodline, that his blood is of God (of Nature), of a Real Family (Race) of God, and not the legal state (artificially birth-certified and registered to the district/Caesar), is therefore a slave of the State (fictional creator of legal persons). For persons have no blood, and their creator god is only man’s government. Only through legal persona (mask/status) can we all be made into the humanistic race of adam, banned from the Garden and doomed to suffer the wrath of disobeying the Law of Nature (God). The word adam in the Bible translates to mankind, by the way, or in other words all men not spiritually free of the world (artificial construct) of man’s design. Adam (mankind) is man fallen, those entrapped in the anti-God legal matrix. The story of Adam as a singular man is a personification of all men, personification being the only way to tell such a story of moral teaching. We are all acting as adam did, biting into the apple (fig) of artificial knowledge (information), the concepts, lies, and inventions of man that go against the Law and Design of Nature (God). The metaphor is beautiful and instructive when read correctly and applied to oneself.

But the race-baiting politicians and other deceitful entertainers (professional, paid liars) seek to divide so as to conquer, to oppose all moral Law, and to cause you to do the same. To do this, all that might disagree must be labeled as racist, just like Lenin intended the fallacious title to be used. And finally, when each “side” of the now equalized debt-slaves are too afraid to speak, and when our hatred of each side is the guiding principal behind policy and entertainment, then the laws of forced equality can be made firm, and we all become like a deranged triangle, where each side blames the other for the shape we are in though never actually seeing any side but ones own.

Yet all the sides of a triangle are equal, aren’t they?

The point is not to bring us together, but to force us together when such a disposition is impossible in Nature. This constant recreation of forced turmoil by folding the different cultural and often opposing laws and religious moral foundations is the total opposite of what the Bible instructs. We are supposed to leave Babylon, not force it into legal existence, and certainly not to tolerate such destruction of our moral, foundational heritage and counterbalancing, spiritual Law. We are supposed to preserve and enforce the Moral Law, not allow it to be mixed and tainted by other cultural, legal, and religious influences. But hey, such moral reactions would be labeled fallaciously as “racist” in these strange days.

—=—

“You know, to just be grossly generalistic, you could put half of Trump’s supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. Right? [Laughter/applause]. The racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic — you name it. And unfortunately there are people like that…”

–Hillary Clinton

—=—

Intolerance is tolerance…

Should the average “American” be tolerable to these flattering titles of opposing lifestyles, as that which absolutely defeats and opposes the moral (unwritten) standard of conduct? If so, then what use is it to have a country and law in the first place? What is a country created for but to ensure a like-minded people sharing a system of law and culture exclusive of all other lifestyles and systems be protected in that moral belief system? Should the foundation of Bible Law as common law be forgotten or ignored to make room for a completely different and opposing system of law and religion, just so the appearance of intolerance can be pretended not to exist in the minds of “American” men? And come to think of it, what country, state, or nation in the history of the world has ever not been xenophobic or consequently been destroyed by its sudden tolerance of outside political and religious influence? Wikipedia explains that xenophobia is:

“…the fear and distrust of that which is perceived to be foreign or strange.[1][2] Xenophobia can involve perceptions of an ingroup towards an outgroup and can manifest itself in suspicion of the activities of others, and a desire to eliminate their presence to secure a presumed purity and may relate to a fear of losing national, ethnic, religious, linguistic, cultural, social class or racial identity.[3]…”

—=—

Isn’t that the purpose of starting an organized structure of society? Isn’t that the purpose of creating a corporation, its bylaws, and its leaders? In other words, isn’t every country, every tribe, every “people,” and for that matter every family (race) by default steeped in xenophobia? Can a race exist without racism? In other words, can race exist without being prideful and proud of what that race (family) is specifically because it is different than all others? Can one man call another man a racist without acknowledging the fact that his idea of racism stems from being a different race than he that he calls as racist? Can we really deny the existence of race so as to not appear to be racist, when the Truth of the matter is that we cannot help or quit being of a race (family) in the first place? Do you believe that the denial of the existence of race somehow alters the fact that we are all of different races (families/bloodlines)? Do you not see the trickery here? Do you not see the social engineering being foisted upon you so that you have no power to defend yourself as part of a race (family), and therefore have no power to act morally or from the Moral Law of Nature, because you can no longer identify with your own family (race) values? Do you not see that this is all designed to steal your soul away from Nature, away from your Source?

For better or worse, all of these constructs, from countries to religions, are artificial families (corporations) that have instilled their own artificial (legally derived) family values as law from the actual family (race) that started them. Only tolerance of the intolerable, those that act purposefully against the founding family (race) values, can destroy the country. And the greatest tool to manage such a hostile takeover is the good old manipulation of Christian tolerance. Not balanced, educated tolerance with all other virtues, but the artificial kind that is enforced by legal law — the kind that has allowed countless opposing religions and legal systems to be legally protected by government as they attempt to destroy and change the entire structure of law, religion, and family (race) values that made America what it is. Good or bad, right or wrong, whatever all countries around the world have become, their strengths and weaknesses, are solely to be blamed on the race (family) that created and continues to sustain them. If the race (family) is driven out of its own creation, the country no longer exists except in empty name only.

Now riddle me this… What country in history was not built on a distrust and fear of other cultures? What country is ever not foreign to another? There simply is no such thing as a non-foriegn country. And it is a much quoted subject that the man or country of men without fear of interference is certain to fail, and will ultimately be assimilated into another in just a few short generations. In other words, a People (family) that tolerates another way of life and law must necessarily lose their own, for two opposing forces must, by their nature, repel each other. If this isn’t clear, try pushing two magnets together the wrong way. They must be forced together, and the repulsion will never actually cease, and so neither can the executive military force behind it. We must be bound by the invisible chains of legalistic law in order to merge all cultures, all systems of law and religion into one global society, one soulless, bloodless family of the fallen adamites. This is like blowing up a balloon past its elastic capacity, knowing it will explode from the pressure of being forced to accept more than it can tolerate. I guess the balloon is therefore racist against certain air? Those enforcing this artificial tolerance know exactly what the result will be, and the United Nations was set up to govern the madness and spiritually dead order out of chaos they are instilling.

I want you to really consider this statement by the former first lady (of the Royal American bloodline) for a moment. More to the point, consider its holier-than-thou source. Hillary Clinton is part of the royal family, that is, the bloodlines of European nobility and kings, just as her husband (cousin) is, and just as every president and vice-president that has ever been placed by congress into the United States corporation is. In other words, Clinton’s power is a direct result of her race, her “white-blooded” (pure) family line, which by her own choice of words makes her the most “racist” figure in that room! What are the queens and kings of Europe if not one big, unhappy family (race)? And what are all of us to them if not tolerated, deplorable goyim?

The following are all a single race (family bloodline). They are not different races, only different corporations held under the same family estate. And, like the United States, they are all organized by a constitution. Constitutions are a dime a dozen, sorry… And they’re all hereditary in their lines of succession, or in other words, it’s all in the family (race). There are no heirs if there is no race (family). You really have to be a fool to believe that the United States president is not also in actuality another family minion upon this list. Trump is as “white” as they come, because in their world, the word white means a pure-blooded royal descendent of the kings of the following kingdoms:

State
Type
Succession
Dynasty
Title
First-in-line
 Kingdom
of Belgium
Constitution
Hereditary
Saxe-
Coburg and Gotha
King
Prince Philippe of Belgium, Duke of Brabant cropped.jpg
Heir apparent: Princess Elisabeth, Duchess of Brabant (eldest child)
Denmark Kingdom
of Denmark
Constitution
Hereditary
Glücksburg
Queen
Dronning Margrethe II (crop).jpg
Heir apparent: Crown Prince Frederik(eldest child)
 Principality
of Liechtenstein
Constitution
Hereditary
Liechten-stein
Sov. Prince
Fürst Hans-Adam II. von und zu Liechtenstein.jpg
Heir apparent: Hereditary Prince Alois (eldest son)
 Grand Duchy
of Luxembourg
Constitution
Hereditary
Bourbon
Grand Duke
Henri of Luxembourg in Brazil 28Nov07.JPG
Heir apparent: Hereditary Grand Duke Guillaume (eldest child)
 Principality
of Monaco
Constitution
Hereditary
Grimaldi
Sov. Prince
Albert II Monaco (2008).jpg
Heir apparent: Hereditary Prince Jacques (only legitimate son)
 Kingdom of
the Netherlands
Constitution
Hereditary
Orange-Nassau/
Amsberg
King
Koning-willem-alexander-okt-15-s.jpg
Heir apparent: Princess Catharina-Amalia, Princess of Orange (eldest child)
 Kingdom of Norway
Constitution
Hereditary
Glücksburg
King
President Medvedev with King Harald V of Norway big225593 (crop).jpg
Heir apparent: Crown Prince Haakon (only son)
 Kingdom of Spain
Constitution
Hereditary
Bourbon
King
Felipe de Borbón en Ecuador.jpg
Heir presumptive: Princess Leonor, Princess of Asturias (elder daughter) [II]
 Kingdom of Sweden
Constitution
Hereditary
Bernadotte
King
Carl XVI Gustaf.jpg
Heir apparent: Crown Princess Victoria (eldest child)
 United Kingdom of
Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Constitution
Hereditary
Windsor
Queen
Elizabeth II greets NASA GSFC employees, May 8, 2007 edit.jpg
Heir apparent: Prince Charles, Prince of Wales (eldest son)

—=—

Yes, those subjects of royalty also have a constitution, you know, that thing you as a national citizenship as a status (property) created by congress has been tricked into worshiping even though it has nothing to do with you under that common, lower-class status of denizened personhood? But they are at least smart enough on some level not to worship that constitution as anything but what it is, a form of idolatrous worship of false gods mediated by magical, legal terms of art to give the appearance of some pretended state of independence, while keeping intact the “royal prerogative” and war powers of the king and queen (head of church and state) of the Crown Corporation and its realms of debt-slaves. Even some Canadians actually think they (as subjects) are not under the power of the queen, that the corporation of “Canada” is not part of that royal corporation sole ruled under the Crown. They at least know, if even in doubt of their own disposition, that they are subjects of a sovereign corporation headed by a false god (king/queen/prince). In America, though as a nation it clearly and openly calls itself sovereign under the law of nations and refers to we the common citizenships as its subjects and customers, we somehow have instilled in ourselves a false-sense of artificial detachment, of freedom from tyranny. We are like a single goldfish in a bowl that believes itself to be somehow sovereign from the man that feeds us and changes our piss and shit-filled water, without whom we would suffocate in our own excrement. We lie to ourselves and teach those unreasonable lies to our children without question, and as children we believe our own lies even after we grow out of most other childhood fantasies. We figure out that Santa Clause and the Easter Bunny aren’t real, but continue to fool ourselves that we are a naturally free people even as we use and claim the protection of the legal property (status in personhood) of the United States government and pay its tax (tribute to Caesar). God created men. Governments create persons. Big difference!

Perhaps you have forgotten or been brainwashed out of knowing what some of these words actually mean?

HEIR-APPARENT – noun – The man who, during the life of his ancestor, is entitled to succeed to his estate or crown. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary Of The English Language)

HEREDITARY – adjective –  1. That has descended from an ancestor. He is in possession of a large hereditary estate. 2. That may descend from an ancestor to an heir; descendible to an heir at law. The crown of Great Britain is hereditary. 3. That is or may be transmitted from a parent to a child; as hereditary pride; hereditary bravery; hereditary disease. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary Of The English Language)

PRINCE – noun – prins. [Latin princeps.] 1. In a general sense, a sovereign; the chief and independent ruler of a nation or state. Thus when we speak of the princes of Europe, we include emperors and kings. Hence, a chief in general; as a prince of the celestial host. 2. A sovereign in a certain territory; one who has the government of a particular state or territory, but holds of a superior to whom he owes certain services; as the princes of the German states. 3. The son of a king or emperor, or the issue of a royal family; as princes of the blood. In England, the eldest son of the king is created prince of Wales… (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary Of The English Language)

—=—

If the prince (or president) is a sovereign, and you are its subject, then you are not sovereign.

Worst of all, you have either forgotten or choose to remain actively ignorant of the fact that the sovereign royalty of America is of the same bloodlines (family) as the royalty of these European rulers. You choose to casually ignore the most race-oriented regime of corporations (nations) in the world, in all of history, the royal houses that lay claim to most of the (secular) world. You pretend that elections are fair, and that just anyone, from any race/family (bloodline) can become president. And nowadays, with such horrific race-baiting being pushed in all forms of entertainment and media, you are being entrained to believe in the fallacy that only “white” skinned people are in power. In other words, in stead of realizing the truth about the completely race-orientated royal bloodlines (families) that rule every nation, we are all being tricked into blaming all problems created by those exclusive (actual racist) bloodlines (presidents, vice-presidents, congress, corporate CEO’s, etc.) on the color of skin, completely missing the actual problem that is the respect of such royal (uncorrupted) bloodlines. All blood in reality is red when it’s visible to the Truth of the open air without legal (anti-God) consideration, not white or black. We are ruled by one race (foreign family) of men (heirs) according to heraldic, genealogical heritage, and we don’t even know it’s happening. Instead, this family of absolutely corrupt “royals” confuses and obfuscates from this reality by convincing the black people that its all the white people’s fault, the brown people that its all the yellow people’s fault, and the white people that its every other color’s fault. But the Truth is that none of this has anything to do with skin-color and everything to do with the actual meaning of the word “race.” Race is not determined by skin color, but by bloodline (family). “We, the People” is not us, white or black. It is a select bloodline, a family of men enjoined and working together to suppress, control, and extort in every way imaginable the rest of the common population of Earth. And that includes all skin-colors, with no regard to race (family). In fact, the whole idea and purpose of national citizenship is to pretend destruction, that is, legal corruption (attainder) of the blood and therefore bloodline and blood-rights of all other men not in the so-called royal family. No blood, no God-given rights, for they are inherent only to free men, not subjects in false persona (national citizenships).

Perhaps you’ve never considered that there is no such thing as a “people” in Nature? There was no people of England until it was invented. There were no Americans until America was legally created. All so-called people (a legal title) are inventions of men. And so any incorporation of “people” that supposedly exists is necessarily a fraud, illegitimate, and certainly not a Creation of Nature (God). Perhaps you never thought to ask the question as a United States citizenship just who “We, the People” actually is? Perhaps you’ve never realized that a subject of the United States is therefore a subject of whomever “We, the People” happen to be? Trust me, you would know if you were one of them, that is, one of their race (bloodline), for you would be declaring such racism in order to be part of that elite (upper-class) band of race-driven rulers of the rest of us.

To be clear, this is the epitome of True racism, and is, in fact, the only Real racism that exists in the world. It’s called royalty. Nobility. Heraldry. Genealogy. Elitism. The upper-class. And only they are considered as “white” because the meaning of this word white in legalese refers to the purity of blood as it relates only to the royal, inheritable (family) bloodline and therefore the line of blood-right succession, not skin color. Again, I tell you that Barack Obama is “white” according to legal law, being a direct descendent of the Royal family (race), as are most “black” skinned actors and politicians that are of that bloodline. You think Hally Barry isn’t considered “white” ??? LOL! Every one of them is in line for the throne, down to the last and most distant legitimately blood-linked cousin. In other words, to be a member (cousin) of the “legitimate” royal family (bloodline) is to stand as an inheritor of the corporations created by them, which they call as their kingdoms. As a common citizen of any nation, no man is actually considered as a “white” man, for the very conception of citizenship to a nation requires the forfeiture and attainder of such consideration by blood-right (God-given rights) in exchange for legal (artificial) rights. The goal is to turn all men of all races not royal unto the identity of legal persons (fictions without blood).

This modern conceptualization of racism is designed to do one and only one thing — to destroy the family unit, and therefore to destroy what is known as family values. But this sinister effort is only designed for the common citizenships of nations. The royal families exist behind the scenes, hidden beyond the corporate administrative state set up to control the plebes. Even today the queen of England pretends to be honorary, ceremonial, and not in charge of the “constitutional monarchy” that is the United Kingdom and Union. The further out of sight the hidden royal hand can exist, the more powerful it becomes.

We have no idea what it means anymore when we see signs that point to “private land” or a “private road” ahead, only that we are not supposed to go there. We only know that we would be trespassing if we did. Yet we have no idea that such a sign represents a different jurisdiction, a different realm of landholding bloodline families. We only know that we are not part of that family. And we treat that invisible border across that private land the same way we treat the US border, respecting that what lies beyond is unwelcoming, foreign territory we need permission to tread upon.

The very definition of an individual estate, country, nation, or state is that it’s foreign to all others. All 50 States are foreign to the United States (the district of Washington/New Columbia). Again, in this word foreign we garner that the law is private and strict, and therefore totally intolerant of any other culture or law — intolerant, in other words, of any other People (State) except by contract (constitution/compact/treaty, etc.). This is, for all intents and purposes, the way of the world in every country, culture, and creed (belief system). They that create a State (incorporated, private/foreign People) are always, without exception, a bloodline (family) of men. The formation of a nation is by definition the formation of an ethnicity, the creation of a new artificial “race” (legal family/corporation) of men separate and foreign to what we call as the human race. Man is not human. What is human is that which belongs to men, such as the human anatomy. Humans are not creations of God, of Nature, for the word human is manmade, a scientific classification no different that equine, feline, or canine. To be human is to be the property of man, not a man. To be referred to as a human is to be considered only as an animal, or in other words and by their own definition, as that which has no soul, a thing without self-anima, a thing without (outside of) God’s Realm and Law. The human soul does not belong to a human, it belongs to a man. What is of man is a human quality, but no man is human. To be a “human being” is to act in humanism. To be a man is to be a Creation of God. Human is only ever a property (quality/trait) of man, never the actual man. A People is never a man, for to be part of a people is to be something artificial, something that is invented by and therefore belongs to man, not God. No man is a people, for the word people is a plural. To be part of a people is to no longer be a man of God. This distinction is the foundation of the difference between moral and civil law. Civil law is for people, while moral law is only for men. The moral law must always be held higher, by all men, than that of the legal, civil law of any people he may be voluntarily a part of. It is this distinction, this protective cloak of spiritual, moral Law that has been lost to God’s people. When the foundation of anything fails, the super-structure built upon it must also, self-evidently fall. This is a maxim of law.

The funny thing is that when a person (subject) of the United States is sued, we get a letter from “the People of” whatever State that court is in. We, whom aren’t the people, know without question that we aren’t the people simply because we are sued by the people. The people don’t sue the people, because the people is a single, legal corporation. There is only one people, and it obviously ain’t us. This gets confusing because the general term “people” is used to describe us, as the common people. But the People in the constitution is only referring to the incorporation of that specific “white” the race (bloodline family) as a specific, exclusive “People” (capitalized), not the common goyim.

This private, non-ethnic status of royal privilege, by definition, requires a certain “purity” of blood, in heraldic and genealogical terms of construction. No State (People) exists without this racial (family) background in the world. This is why traditionally we would expect to see Japanese looking people in Japan, Chinese looking people in China, and Scandinavian looking people in the Scandinavian countries. This is not vulgar racism as is promoted to common goyim. This is the True meaning of race. Without race (family), one has no State (private People). And without a private People (State), one has no reason to track and keep record of pure (white) blood. And this is the very opposite of national (mixed) ethnicity (national identity). For the royal families of Africa and Thailand, I assure you, have white (pure) blood despite their dark complexion according to their heraldic records. Pure blood, of course, doesn’t actually exist. It merely refers to the active recording of genealogical records in heraldry, no different than any corporation is structured to reflect a president, vice president, and all the line of succession by blood relation. To be clear, I know no man that does not seek to pass on his inheritance to his bloodline child (issue). In other words, you are equally as guilty of invoking this false, proprietary lineage as any royal. Only the scope and size of the commercial transaction of inheritance is different. In this way, we must acknowledge the fact that we are all in fact racist, which ultimately means nothing at all in Nature (Reality), only that we wish the best for our own children (family bloodline).

But you must understand the difference between your status as a national citizenship (commercial vessel) and those private, royal rulers of that persona (property). You have been tricked and continuously brainwashed into believing that your family is the nation (corporation) you were born into. And you identify your race by that nation. There is no such think as Japan or China or Mexico in Nature. These are corporations created by private families (races). Ethnicity is simply not what you believe it to be. Ethnicity can only be understood from the perspective of master and slave. If you ask a slave what slave-master’s estate he belongs to, he would tell you the family name of his master. So too does a citizenship of any nation identify his origin by the nation he was birthed (registered/taxed) into. And so, to us, it seems perfectly reasonable to identify ourselves as “Americans” or as “Englishmen” or as “African.” This is no different than saying I am an employee (agent) of “Walmart” or “Target” corporation. A nation is an artificial construct, a fake family (race), made solely of persons (fictional characters). The fact that you have been entrained to identify yourself by your ethnicity (nationally spoken language) is a cosmic joke, for the whole reason behind such identity (pretended sameness as fiction) is to taint your bloodline (family), to take you out of Nature and place you in attainder (corruption of blood) so that you can and must be governed by the governments (mind control) of nations. Yet, as I’ve written about extensively, these royal families (races) are not of the nations. They created the nations as holding companies for we, their debt-enslaved goyim. They are private (foreign) and sovereign from all nations. Most importantly, to identify yourself by ethnicity is to remove yourself from God (Nature). It is to cause you to deny God as your Source of Existence and Law, and thus cause you to worship false idols and gods (magistrates). I am not American, I am of the Universe (Jehovah). But to the royal families (race), we are all just one color, the color of corruption, which is the color of heathens. We are all the color black to them…

ETHNOLOGY – noun – [Gr. nation, and discourse.] A treatise on nations. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary Of The English Language)

ETHNICAL – adjective – [Latin ethnicus; Gr. from nation from the root of G. heide, heath, woods, whence heathen. See Heathen.] Heathen; pagan; pertaining to the gentiles or nations not converted to christianity; opposed to Jewish and Christian. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary Of The English Language)

ETHNIC – noun – A heathen; a pagan. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary Of The English Language)

ETHNICISM – noun – Heathenism; paganism; idolatry. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary Of The English Language)

HEATHEN – noun – [Gr. from heath, that is, one who lives in the country or woods, as pagan from pagus, a village.] 1. A pagan; a Gentile; one who worships idols, or is unacquainted with the true God. In the Scriptures, the word seems to comprehend all nations except the Jews or Israelites, as they were all strangers to the true religion, and all addicted to idolatry. The word may now be applied perhaps to all nations, except to Christians and Mohammedans. Heathen, without the plural termination, is used plurally or collectively, for Gentiles or heathen nations. Ask of me, and I will give thee the heathen for thine inheritance. Psalms 2:8. Heathen, however, has a plural, expressing two or more individuals. If men have reason to be heathens in Japan– The precepts and examples of the ancient heathens. 2. A rude, illiterate, barbarous person. – adjective – Gentile, pagan; as a heathen author. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary Of The English Language)

—=—

The reference to Christians above is not a reference to the false denominations of corporate, legalist religions set up by the state to deceive and distract you from the True meaning of God and the Bible, but is a title placed on those that cannot and will not become part of the nations of men because they choose to follow only the Law of God, not men. These are the True followers of Christ, who understand that Christ is the Law (Word) of God, not a mere idol to worship as a false god. To be called a “Christian” while at the same time be called a citizen of any nation is to be exactly the fool they want us all to be, having two flattering titles that are diametrically opposed to one another, representing two completely opposing systems of law. This is how to create chaos, and then construct a legal, secular system of order from it.

So that this concept of bloodline as race is clear, please consider that the current, hereditarily acquired “black-skinned” kings of the kingdoms of Morocco, Eswatini, and Lesotho in Africa are by their very assent to the thrown racist. They are in power because of their bloodline (race), which must be understood to be legally considered as “white” in legal (artificial) color, meaning pure-bred from their own royal race (People/family) that reigned before them. And waiting in the wings are eager, blood-related men seeking to take that throne away from their brother, sister, father, or cousin. Race is power. Racial discrimination is the center of that power, and is the very difference between common, national citizenships and the People (State) that rules over them. Without race, there would be no countries, no kingdoms.

Just what do you think Game Of Thrones is about, anyway?

(Hint: In that show, those are cousins having sex with and entering into arranged marriages with direct, pure bloodline cousins to carry on the “royal” pretended-to-be-legitimate line of succession, and killing each other in order to claim hereditary blood-right as heir-apparent to those various, interrelated thrones, as head of those corporations. It’s a fictional show about the actual fiction of pretended royal families that still rule over us corrupted, tainted-blood commoners today. It’s all part of training you to remain under the illusionary power and control of their self-proclaimed superior race, by fictionalizing and pretending such things don’t actually exist anymore, not since dragons roamed the earth. And unicorns. Corporations are ruthless… because it’s always been all in the family. Royalty is just a sophisticated mafia family, organized crime under the guise of the magic and trickery that is rebranded as the prestige of royal blood.)

Now, where does this leave the race-baiting meme of so-called “white” privilege?

Imagine if I went to Japan and entered a Japanese family’s house (a term that means family or race) and exclaimed that they have “red privilege.” Or how about I go to Iran and claim that those families of the same race have “brown privilege.” How about the “yellow privilege” of the main families in China? Yet we have been entrained to accept that the people of Denmark and America have “white privilege” despite every other imagined colored race in the world. Meanwhile, we are all being extorted and seriously screwed over in so many ways by the only actual race of “People” that are still able to claim their bloodline (family/race) as the private founding families of the States (People) united. They’ve made us equal in our enslavement with the right hand while using the left hand to focus our attention on each other instead of the Source of our collective despotism, which we have been fooled into thinking is the price of freedom. And now, by turning this non-existent concept of racism into a so-called legal “hate-crime,” we now have the veritable legal tool to cause each other harm by turning this fallacy of race (family) into a dirty word, and by punishing anyone that acknowledges it. Again, this is the only way we can be governed legally, if we do harm and injure (bring into false, legal law) each other for non-crimes that are legally (artificially) imposed on nonsensical terms like “racist” hate crimes.

How do you destroy a People, a family, that bases its society on “family values?”

You do exactly what these royal bloodlines have done to us — destroy the ability of men to claim to be part of a family. If you take away race (family) from a man, you necessarily take away his ability to practice in action any form of family (race) values. And in their place, we must be convinced to voluntarily accept and thus tolerate all that is opposed to and that is actively-at-war-with our family (race), leaving us defenseless (without the ability to bear heraldic Arms of our families) against the legal matrix simulation. War and peace have no distinction, for either way the commerce of the gods of mammon shall be done. Amen. War is a very profitable commercial transaction, with instant rewards. Peace just takes a little longer to reach such profit levels.

Since the True meanings of these words have been lost on most of us as we are entertained and entranced with lies and propaganda about how we are all racist and shameful even though we are all considered legally (artificially) equal under the law as tainted, blood-corrupted debt-slaves, regardless of skin-color, we fail to recognize the difference between a nation (commercial corporation) and a State (private, incorporated People). Many of us call ourselves as “Christians” but are “unacquainted with the True God” because corporate religion is merely empty idol worship – the worship of the form of symbols, statues, heroes, saviors, fictional personas, flattering titles, and saints without substance, without actually obeying the Law of God, that is, without ever being or becoming Christ-like as instructed. This is (we are) what they of the private, royal bloodlines (race) call as heathenism, paganism, the lower class of goyim. Those that are citizenships in any nation (corporation) can only be gentiles, for they (we) follow the legal law above and most often against that of the Law of Nature (God’s Law/Word). This is not religion, this is law. This is the way the legal system works, causing voluntary attainder (legal, fictional corruption of blood), which causes class division, as those who claim blood-right (the right to Bear family Arms) and those who have rescinded that right in order to accept replacement legal rights granted and enforced by the still lawfully recognized families (races). This is every nation. The actual pre-modern Jews, as mentioned here, had no nation, which is why they were a free people and, having no nation, were called “the international jew.” The nation of Israel, unlawful and illegitimate as it is, is not full of Jews, it is full of goyim that call themselves as “Jews” just as this supposedly Christian nation of America is full of goyim that call themselves as “Christians.” No follower of Christ (God’s Law) would take a false god or its false legal (e.g. civil) law (doctrine) above that of the Law of Nature (God). In fact, that is the very aspect that confirms one is a True follower of Christ, one that in his or her actions is Christ-like, and therefore in all ways intolerable to the legal systems and nation of men acting in legal persona (anti-God). Likewise, the Native American Indian tribes and other aboriginal free peoples were never conquered (purchased) until they agreed to become “nations” instead of free tribes. To be an Indian nation is to abandon the Indian culture and life to become just another ethnic class of lower-class goyim (heathen gentiles). The citizenships of Israel today, as well, are persons of the nation, not free men of and under God. They have fallen for the oldest trick in the book, thinking that being a member of the so-called “Jewish” nation of Israel (a legal corporation) is synonymous with being and acting like Israelite from the Bible. It is the same with the “Cristians” that believe that being a follower of Christ (God’s Law) is the same as being a member of a “Christian” nation or false, legally derived religion (corporation). A nation is the perfect example of Orwell’s meme that freedom is slavery, as all men enjoined in citizenship to any nation are its debt-slaves, free to choose their mode of employment (being used) as a commodity in a neo-feudalistic human capital management system (capitalism). The point is that every nation is run by some bloodline of men, some hereditarily conjoined club of “royal” (upper-class) rulers that remain private (foreign) from that nation in their own State (private People). In other words, we are all ruled by tolerated racism.

You can say it till you’re red in the face, but the statistics always paint a different picture…

Racism is a lie told to those not of the royal, master race,
in order to hide their own institutionalized, millennium-old heredity-based racism, by focusing all goyim on a war between cultural differences, which are falsely attributed to skin-color so as to keep us busy fighting each other instead of they that enslave us.

The truth is that every one of us are equal, that is, equally under their spell…

They look like us, but once you see these royal “families” for what they are, you realize that the lie of cultural, ethnic racism is only skin deep. Black or white, or anywhere in between, we are all trapped in the lower, vulgar class they created for us, for all of our blood has been turned black, our True Nature tainted, our souls corrupted. It is amusing to think of a white slave and a black slave arguing over who is more enslaved, using only skin-color to determine what is otherwise self-evident. For Orwell seems to have shortened one of his equative, dystopian maxims…

Equality is Slavery. Slavery is Freedom. Freedom is equality. Repeat.

If equality is slavery and slavery is freedom, then freedom is slavery.
It’s simple math.

And what is equality but forced tolerance?

And what is forced tolerance but institutionalized intolerance of any individual cultural strength and unity, a culture of cultural hate?

Still don’t get it?

This cultural neutering, the making impotent of cultural custom through equalization, is the same as allowing the common people to worship (think about) God however they see fit, but never to actually act on the moral law that scriptures teach. In other words, it is literally illegal to practice moral law.

You cannot be Christian (a follower of Christ/God’s Law) and also be under an opposing, legal system of law (false doctrine/law). A Christian, by definition, cannot tolerate anything legal (man-made law), for legal law is always, 100% opposed to (the undoing of) the Law of Nature (God). One can’t live according to truth (God) at all times and also adhere to the lies of legalism. Likewise, no culture can possibly be tolerable of the influence and immigration of another, especially when the customs and laws are different and opposed to each other.

Legal equality means we are all equally punishable under the legal law, and have no right to use, act under, or invoke the moral law (God). Freedom of religion is intolerable to a man of God, for the Law of Nature never changes. The Law of Nature (God) is not religion. Religion is part of man’s creation, not God’s.

And once you see them for what they are, you suddenly lose all tolerance and respect for them. Only the law they created to control us, to cause us to harm one another instead of loving each other — only the delusion of their artifice of esteem and legal, class-based status protects them from us… only the illusion they cast:

–=–

You want proof of our equality, that poverty and despotism is colorblind, then go to your local homeless shelter. Go to your local tent city. Go to your local food locker. See the equality oozing from the disenfranchised and start doing something to change it. Or are you too good for that lower class… kinda like they are too good for your class? Go tell those “white” people that they have “white” privilege and see what happens!

These bodies politic (incorporated “People”) were created not as legal entities but as a stock of people related by blood. Their created nations are designed to hold not their own stock, but the common live-stock of we gentiles (goyim), that is, we that are born into the heathen, idolatrous nations. Have we forgotten that the very concept of the various immigration policies of every country in the world are based on race (family) connection to that people (State)? Are we just going to ignore that the whole purpose of the war and creation of modern Israel was for the sole purpose of created a homeland for “Jews” and that this means that Palestinians (Arabs) therefore were displaced because of their “race” and ethnicity, as a bloodline not considered “Jewish” and therefore supposedly impure (not white, not pure-blooded, not uncorrupted)? Are we supposed to reconsider what it is to be “Mexican” or “English” or “Indian” because that is now a racist title, let alone not be allowed to consider that many diseases are exclusive to certain races (bloodlines)? Should all True cultures be vanquished to make room for… Ah, globalism. Now it’s starting to make sense. Global dystopia, Orwellian style. United Nations are really just united goy – one big melting pot of Godless heathens without any foundation of family values living without any natural moral compass.

What happens when, instead of being a natural (uncontrollable) occurrence and inevitably natural (God-given) order of species, the word race is used instead as a shallow excuse for illicit, bad behavior? What happens when moral men cannot defend what they have built, both physically and spiritually, to protect themselves from immoral men of either the same or a different race if they (we) are forced to tolerate everything that is intolerable and opposed to the continued survival and success of the fruit of their combined labors? What happens when one can no longer be effective in ones communication when even his words are considered as racist, sexist, or intolerable merely because they have a masculine, authoritative tone behind them? The answer to these questions is apparent in most nations today, not the least of which are the North American ones.

For the first time in history, the concept of race (bloodline and recorded familial genealogy) is being treated as an evil, as if racial differences both cultural and genetic simply don’t exist… except, that is, for the “royal” families This cultural neutering must be accompanied by national and now global tolerance, not only of cultural differences but specifically of absolutely opposing laws, until no moral (unwritten) law or notion of public decency is left. In other words, the only people left over, those that are not tolerated by this newly conditioned society of universal tolerance, are those that espouse any form of moral outrage, moral law, or other values that infringe upon the legal “human” rights of the most immoral of men. Our right to possess and exhibit a moral character in society will not be tolerated. Morality is racism. Family values are akin to xenophobia. Spirituality is a thought crime. Equality is artificially induced by legal law at birth, not by knowledge or actions. Solidarity in tolerance requires intolerance of all dissent, of all freedom of thought, and of all respect for difference. Tolerance is active ignorance of what should by all rights not be tolerated. And we are experiencing these facts in everything from music, art, and media to the corruption of medical, scientific, and intellectualist Babel that is killing and maiming us in droves every day.

Here’s Michael Moore, whose own American immigrant genealogy includes a forefather that was a white slave brought to America from a European prison, speaking in absolute lunacy about whatever he is pretending to perceive “the white guy” and “white men” to be. We are being indoctrinated by these societal-actors to hate ourselves, to become intolerable towards our own people, our own rich history, and to revision ourselves as oppressors instead of being equally oppressed as all other men, and regardless of the color of our skin. This is the ultimate example of profiteering off of race-baiting, a well-orchestrated deceit used by those in power to keep it in the family (bloodline). And perhaps most disturbing is the audience response!

—=—

The promotion of “racism” is nothing if not the induction of men into a culture of self-hatred. As a deleterious label placed on moral men defending their family honor and values, Zionist and other race-driven influencers, propagandists, and race-baiters have proven this fallacious term “racist” in whatever form it is implemented to be an invaluable and destructive weapon that, in the war of public opinion, wins by default every time. Why? Because ignorance is strength, and the public is swimming in a very large and controlled vat of induced, tolerated, active ignorance. If the messenger can be destroyed by such labels as antisemite or racist, then communism in whatever form it dresses up as wins every time. But isn’t that exactly what was portrayed by those screaming crowds of common heathens in Nineteen Eighty-four in their idolatrous worship of their glorious leader (false god)? Do you think worshiping Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump is not idolatry? Of course it is! And its exactly what is expected from we, the goyim.

How does one separate anciently engrained cultures from the races of men that have continuously practiced them, when the very conception of that culture has everything to do with race (bloodline)? The answer is that you can’t, for all cultures and systems of law and religion are unique to race, save that Law which is taught by Jesus Christ. But this law is not one of tolerance or acceptance, but one of privacy, of remaining foreign from men and cultures and nations that are exactly what we have all become, common pagans in idol worship of false gods and followers of other doctrines (i.e. man’s legal systems of law). These cultures cannot be mixed. They are by their nature unique and necessarily exclusive from all others. That which opposes a foundational culture and system of law cannot be integrated together and somehow remain uncorrupted or uninfluenced by the other. The very nature of any culture is assimilation of all others. In other words, one is expected to adapt and follow whatever culture and legal law system he or she emigrates into. But this is only true of the goyim, those that are enslaved by the false freedom (legal franchise) of citizenship to a some nation (corporation), that is, idolatry to a false (legal) god (ruler by blood inheritance). And by definition any and every culture, system of law, and religion is defined by its uniqueness, its intolerance of all others. Without these differences, this foundational, integrated opposition of all cultures to all others, there would be no reason for them to exist, just as there is no purpose for the existence of legal (manmade/written) law except to specifically stand against the moral, spiritual, unwritten Law of Nature (God) as expressed in the Bible and other scriptures (books of spiritual, moral law).

In other words, the goal of universal tolerance is to destroy all culture, all religion, all law, and all spirituality steeped in morality, so as to cause the inception of a singular, completely amoral, intolerable global society called as globalism… a new world (secularist) order. But again, because we have been made actively ignorant of this ancient Latin word secular (translated as the artificial, commercial world of men, not of God, not of Nature), we have no idea how to fight the implementation of this New World Order so often projected in science fiction dystopias like Orwell’s and Huxley’s. Because the Latin word seclorum in the phrase printed on every dollar bill is translated as “world” instead of its actual meaning of “secular,” most folks do not understand that this new world (secular) order is nothing more or less than a total destruction of all spiritual concepts, belief systems, and moral actions (self-government) by men. Because we have lost knowledge of the fact that the Bible is the foundation of common law in America and in the European countries (holders of the ultimate, true “racism” attributed to the genealogically derived royal families and their blood-lines of succession), there is no referential left to us that we may fight this global secularism with that which it is opposed to. Secularism is diametrically opposed to the Bible, or in other words, legalism (written law) is absolutely opposed to the moral, unwritten, Bible Law. In a totally secular order, no spirituality or moral thought or right will be tolerated. This secular toleration of all things anti-moral is the end game of this modern, universal tolerance we are all both passively and actively accepting, acting in, and pretending to love — loving that which we should hate, as the Bible warns we shall time and again in our participation and respect of “worldly” deprivation, leading to our ultimate self-destruction. We are tolerating our own demise. We are at this point tolerating an Orwellian nightmare without even a whimper, for to speak out against tolerance will not be tolerated by the intolerable promoters of universal, secularist tolerance.

You know what I have finally come to understand? It’s a real ballbuster. The truth is that almost every public attack, every so-called hate crime, every theft and every assault, every shooting, public education, blood-sport, assault and murder… these are all racist. Why? Because one generally does not attack and steal from one’s own family.

Acceptance of what is a known evil is surrender from what is self-evidently good.

Tolerance is intolerance.

War is peace because we peacefully tolerate war.

Freedom is slavery because we freely tolerate slavery.

Ignorance is strength because we strongly tolerate ignorance.

Through ignorance, slavery, and war (which are falsely called as knowledge, freedom, and peace) we will be destroyed through our own tolerance of intolerable things, our love of what we should hate, our acceptance of that which we should not accept, our value in that which holds no actual value, until that which we have so long tolerated destroys us through intolerance of good, moral men — just like any host allows a parasite to devour it because the parasite utterly controls the thoughts of the host. The only difference is that we are passively volunteering to be devoured.

One last thing… to those playing the “racist” game, using this term so openly and without reserve to describe all the ills that have befallen you, I want you to stop and consider something for a moment. Perhaps you are being treated exactly how you are treating other men? Perhaps you are experiencing the Law of Nature, that is, that you should expect to be treated as you treat others? Perhaps your problem is that you are just being an asshole and so are being treated like one? And perhaps somewhere along the way you’ve simply mistaken the response of people to your being an asshole with racism? Perhaps your demand for equality would be better taken if, instead of invoking how different you are based on your race by saying others are racist, you actually treated everyone with respect, the way you want to be treated?

Or maybe you’re right… Maybe it is racism that makes you an asshole in the first place.

Either way, isn’t it time to overcome what you now know to be a totally bullshit logical fallacy and start being what you want others to be toward you? Perhaps you can do something about all the bad in your life by invoking the good in yourself and the people around you that you blame for your own disposition? Because, I have to be honest here, every time I hear you claim that racism is the reason for your self-created problems, I can’t help but consider that the only racist in the room is he that claims to be a victim of it. Besides, if you are so proud of your race (family), which you should be, what possible thing can I say or do to change that genealogical bloodline connection? Answer: not a damn thing.

If you want to end what you perceive to be racism, then you will necessarily be required to start behaving in a way that doesn’t invoke culture or race. You will have to give up your cultural heritage and act exactly how those elitist bloodsuckers want you to act… like the rest of us white debt-slaves.

Moral of the story: stop being assholes to each other.

.

–Clint > richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Wednesday, August 14st, 2019

Lethal Injection Part 2 Coming Soon


–=–

“When men differ, both sides ought to equally be heard by the
public, for when truth and error have fair play, the former is
always an overmatch for the latter.”

–Benjamin Franklin

–=–

Greetings programs…

Here is the first teaser trailer for my new audio/video book/documentary.


They know… Congress is well-aware that doctors (through prescription and medical error)
are openly shown to actually be the #1 killer of Americans.

–=–

Please note that this is a new youtube channel, created for the purposes of my new radio shows and for trailers for this audio/visual book. I doubt very much the final video will be allowed to be posted and played without being censored, and so please keep this channel handy for updates and to learn how to receive this video offline (free and not for profit), most likely on a thumb drive that you can pass out in activism.

About the project: I’m trying something new. This is not your typical movie or documentary, it is in fact a resource book designed to be listened to and watched, an 40? hour audio/visual experience not before attempted as far as I know, and therefore breaking all the rules of brainwashing and control that keeps us dumbed down through 10 minute memes and popular culture. It will make you laugh and cry, like seeing the (secular) world for the first time. This is a book that you don’t have to read because I’m reading all of their studies and information to you. It is a PHD course in medicine and pharmaceuticals, eugenics (now “genetics”) and its source in university syndicalism and their patents, chemical/biological weapons, drugs in the military, the truth about the proven effects of toxic metals as ingredients and adjuvants, and will prove without a doubt the connection of drugs and vaccines to all modern disease states, drugs impossible to acquire without a doctors prescription (iatrogenic/doctor-caused harm and death). It will expose the Truth behind a most heinous and extreme fallacious lie – that doctors in fact do not take any official oath to do no harm, and certainly not the Hypocritical oath. And it will show the history of doctors and nurses promoting every unhealthy, cancer-causing, recreational and illicit drug as a “cure-all” from cigarettes to methamphetamine, cocaine to speed, alcohol to canibus. Most importantly, this is an attempt to preserve the history of what is fallaciously labeled as the anti-vaccination movement, from its satiric beginnings against mandated vaccines with cow pus (pox) to its now almost completely censored attempts to educate and use science to help people make educated choices, and to prevent the same catastrophes caused by the mandated inoculations of the past.

In the end, my intention is not only to end any debate about the harm caused by inoculation, but to place all the pieces of the puzzle into one undeniable, inarguable master class, revealing 100’s of their own studies and publicly unspoken knowledge of the well-documented harm (side-effects) they have caused, including all the players, good and evil, that complete the puzzle once and for all. In this way, I hope to preserve all the efforts of all of us that have publicly fought this fight and suffered the consequences and censorship of blowing the proverbial whistle.

You’ll be shocked at what I’ve put together, and your suspicions will either be verified or disproven… or you will find the Truth to be much stranger than the fictions you’ve been led to believe. This project is the nuclear bomb to end this foolish world war of willful, institutionalized ignorance and outright, provable lies.

Please help me to get this new youtube channel out there by sharing it and this blog, and either copying or embedding these trailers anywhere you can find them a willing home. Remember, no permission is required to copy, quote, use, and repost my works, ever.

The working, most likely final title? Exactly what it is: Lethal Injection: A Corruption Of Blood

Thanks to all,

.

–Clint > richard-son (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Saturday, August 2nd, 2019 (on the artificial roman timeline)

Thank You For Your Help!


Updated 12:25am, 12/30/19

Thank you so much to those that sent donations (gifts). I almost teared up when I hesitantly opened my email tonight and saw that so many of you had responded so quickly. You’ve no idea how motivating and spiritually uplifting that was, and how good it is to know people still care out there. I reached my goal and more. That said, if this has caused anyone hardship to help me please let me know privately.

I’m leaving the original email as posted below for context and for those that wish to listen to my last radio show and know what I’m up to.

No more donations needed, so please support those in need.

Thank you.

-Clint

———————————————————————–

Greetings programs…

As you know by now, I avoid at all costs asking for money unless I am in need. Today, I am appealing to you to make a small donation at the link to the right so that I might purchase a cheap laptop computer and the industry standard program Microsoft Word.

Why am I asking now?

Firstly, for my own health. I have been lingering in my windowless basement for years now like a hermit monk, researching, writing, etc., and my health has suffered for it. If for no other reason than my sanity, I really need to be able to write and draw inspiration from that which ironically is most often the subject of my expositions — Nature, the sun, freedom from being plugged-in.

Secondly, I would like to start doing short, subject-based radio shows again, as well as having a tool to conduct interviews for my newest audio/visual-book/documentary, which I have been working on for many months, and which, as always, I am able to offer freely without charge. To get an idea about just what this upcoming project is, you can listen to my last interview with Anne Blake Tracy, someone I would very much like to interview (in Arizona) for the film, which I really need a portable computer for. You’ll understand why her contribution, her piece(s) of the puzzle is integral when you hear this:

Link–> https://archive.org/details/clintondeannajune292019

And thirdly, I am taking part of my book series and trying to write up a book proposal, to which I need M. Word. I’m serving little purpose anymore being shadow-banned, hacked, and generally snubbed by that false “movement” that would rather thrive on its own patriotic mythos and romantic lies than seek the Truth at all costs. To reach people, I will therefore try and get a literary agent and get published. All other works and films and radio will remain free and unpublished. Hopefully an agent can help break the barriers set up to keep people like me in the shadows and help me book engagements and debates, etc. Any advice, suggestions, or help to this end are appreciated.

To anyone that contributes at least $20 to my goal in the next week or two, I will (hopefully) send a free, signed copy of any future book I manage to ever get published, if that happens. I’ve nothing else to offer, really. The book will be called “Gleaming The Matrix” with a subtitle about “Simulacrum and Simulation”. It will be a re-write and comparison of The Matrix movie (a metaphor for our collective hypocrisy) with the book it largely was based on by Jean Baudrillard.

To those that have supported my works in the past, I thank you sincerely and humbly. If I haven’t thanked you before on a personal level, please know that when in the middle of a project I have only that one purpose driving my life, and that my gratitude is greater than you can imagine, as your gifts allow me to have the greatest job in the world, my own, without compromise. This means everything to me.

I would like to raise about $400 if possible, which would allow the purchase of a bare bones pc and the program needed. If or when I reach that goal, I’ll update this post to reflect my gratitude and then take the post down shortly after.

They say a mind is a terrible thing to waste. So I leave my fate in your hands…

Thank you,

.

–Clint > richard-son (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Monday, July 29th, 2019

The New Old – Discovering The Coverings Of Alt History


There are many memes supporting what seems to be a mass of interconnected false paradigms floating around in the minds of men today, many of which are designed to alter or outright change the perception of what we helplessly pretend and call as history. You know, his story? The story told of our own story…

From the Origin of Man to Fomenko’s Tartarian paradise to flat earth sophistry to the forever improvable religion of science known as the big bang, there is obviously a concerted effort, if not to merely hide the mythos of cultural, political, and scientific history, to utterly destroy its perspective relationship to the current state of international and religious affairs. And why not? What dictator, what royal family, and what challenger to such elitist tyranny would not want to put forward a historical timeline from which the tyrant justifies his current tyranny? Wasn’t it Orwell that so self-evidently stated he who controls the past, controls the future; and he who controls the present, controls the past?

For today, let us simply address just one of these man-made creators of mythos, the fictionality of Anatolii Fomenko.

I have made my own opinions on what is history and why it can never be trusted clear on this blog and in my book, with the exception being only the laws and opinions contained within the primary sources of the time. For example, the history of America’s pioneering of organized, legalized, state-sanctioned Eugenics can be found in the annals of Supreme Court decisions on forced sterilizations and within the records of the University system from which it was first given traction. We may also know the true nature of the past when presidents and prime ministers are finally apt to apologize for their government’s past actions; for instance the many chemical and biological weapons testing done against unwitting populations. The victims, as the intended receivers of such lame apologies done only after the statute of limitations takes effect or after those involved are already dead, are certainly primary evidence of what can be called true history.

But when it comes to the types of fallacious, mythological, patriotic, and ironically detailed stories told for the purpose of justifying the current role and intolerable actions of the modern ruling elite, we should never fool ourselves that these stories of history exist for any other reason than to foment the continued existence of the illegitimate inheritance of the fruit of those historical tales, which of course are perpetually granted to the offspring of those historical characters. The Queen in right, the presidents and prime ministers and congresses that are her direct descended bloodline of cousins, and all those who, with unwavering nepotistical allegiance, follow in the glory of that family history, where all other 99.99% of the history of common men is ignored to showcase the few powerful criminals that supposedly invented and founded the kingdoms, nations, religions, and legal systems of law that we allow them to govern us with today. After all, it is the current, corrupt bloodline of elitist men that was shat out of the inheritable rectum of their forefathers that control the present by preserving the past so as to ensure the future control of that offspring which shall equally be shat from their own rectums. After all, they certainly cannot be the rulers of men without the inculturation and indoctrination of their own historical narrative, the very lame and fragile justification presented to us all so that we are made to actually believe that their fictional, unjustifiable power structure is just the way it is. History, me thinks, is the greatest excuse for both action and inaction ever invented by men. We are controlled by the institutionalized, exaggerated lies that make up the past just as our children will be controlled by the predictably programed future presented to us by those that continue by birth-right to control the present. Worst of all, we lie to ourselves, using this false pretense of narrative, political history as our own excuse, to pretend our own moral hands are tied, justifying our passive place in the hierarchical mid to low order, pretending we are not voluntarily participating in and even loving our servitude to that upper class and their schema.

The mental state that we all currently occupy in our volutnary, collective obedience to what history apparently has birthed for us was penned and politically planned for us well before any story of America was born. For the conspired brokerage of power is not new to history, and the common man is doomed to repeat history not because he doesn’t study it, but because he passively ignores it. This ignorance manifests its ugly head in every generation, based on both the promise and the possession of the benefits of voluntary participation, voluntary servitude to that which bestows such flattering titles, artificial rights and benefits, and the artificial status of socioeconomics. Love of money. We are lost to history by voluntarily relinquishing our place in it, for the writers of history only include those tales of men whose actions are either favorable to their own continued power brokerage or whom are against it, for every hero needs a villain, even the state. Government has no purpose without the enemies it must create and continuously alienate to justify its militarized armies and police. The politics of obedience are nothing new…

—=—

“Poor, wretched, and stupid peoples, nations determined on your own misfortune and blind to your own good! You let yourselves be deprived before your own eyes of the best part of your revenues; your fields are plundered, your homes robbed, your family heirlooms taken away. You live in such a way that you cannot claim a single thing as your own; and it would seem that you consider yourselves lucky to be loaned your property, your families, and your very lives. All this havoc, this misfortune, this ruin, descends upon you not from alien foes, but from the one enemy whom you yourselves render as powerful as he is, for whom you go bravely to war, for whose greatness you do not refuse to offer your own bodies unto death. He who thus domineers over you has only two eyes, only two hands, only one body, no more than is possessed by the least man among the infinite numbers dwelling in your cities; he has indeed nothing more than the power that you confer upon him to destroy you. Where has he acquired enough eyes to spy on you, if you do not provide them yourselves? How can he have so many arms to beat you with, if he does not borrow them from you? The feet that trample down your cities, where does he get them if they are not your own? How does he have any power over you except through you? How would he dare assail you if he had no cooperation from you? What could he do to you if you yourselves did not connive with the thief who plunders you, if you were not accomplices of the murderer who kills you, if you were not traitors to yourselves? You sow your crops in order that he may ravage them, you install and furnish your homes to give him goods to pillage; you rear your daughters that he may gratify his lust; you bring up your children in order that he may confer upon them the greatest privilege he knows – to be led into his battles, to be delivered to butchery, to be made the servants of his greed and the instruments of his vengeance; you yield your bodies unto hard labor in order that he may indulge in his delights and wallow in his filthy pleasures; you weaken yourselves in order to make him the stronger and the mightier to hold you in check. From all these indignities, such as the very beasts of the field would not endure, you can deliver yourselves if you try, not by taking action, but merely by willing to be free. Resolve to serve no hands upon the tyrant to topple him over, but simply that you support him no longer; then you will behold him, like a great Colossus whose pedestal has been pulled away, fall of his own weight and break into pieces?”

“…Let us therefore admit that all those things to which he is trained and accustomed seem natural to man and that only that is truly native to him which he receives with his primitive, untrained individuality. Thus custom becomes the first reason for voluntary servitude. Men are like handsome race horses who first bite the bit and later like it, and rearing under the saddle a while soon learn to enjoy displaying their harness and prance proudly beneath their trappings. Similarly men will grow accustomed to the idea that they have always been in subjection, that their fathers lived in the same way; they will think they are obliged to suffer this evil, and will persuade themselves by example and imitation of others, finally investing those who order them around with proprietary rights, based on the idea that it has always been that way.

—“The Politics Of Obedience: A Discourse On Voluntary Servitude,” by Etienne de La Boetie

—=—

Custom is just another word for an appeal to history.

But let us get back to the subject at hand…

I am posting this entry upon my journey merely to help you, my fellow slave to history, to understand how historical revisionism is being played out before our eyes, and how easy it is to be duped by the power brokers of nations that seek to alter their own past so as to justify their future actions — despotism and tyranny in the name of history.

And so today I simply wish to point you in the right direction, that you may find both the logic and reasons behind the historical revisionism coming from the Russian empire. For a while it has been hard not to hear of the exploits of one Anatolii Fomenko and the glorious revisionism of Tartary. As if the lost kingdom of Atlantas was suddenly discovered, Tartary is being promoted as its simulated surrogate. This alternative, revisionist effort to recreate history in Russia’s own image is a very interesting case study, believed by innocents and promoted as the new truth by fools. But let us examine the purpose behind this revisioning by looking at just who in the present is attempting to control the past in order to rule in the future.

For this, I pass on to you a book entitled: History as Therapy: Alternative History and Nationalist Imaginings in Russia, by Konstantin Sheiko and Stephen Brown, published May 1, 2014. I was fortunate enough to have found a link to this on a comment board a while back, the commenter I wish to thank and apologize for not being able to source here. That said, I will simply quote from the book and leave a link to a free version as an Ebook for those interested, while asking those with the ability to support the authors by purchasing the ebook if you decide to read and utilize it. I feel this is a very important work, especially for those feeling lost in the melee of historical nonsense and trickery being promoted by so many outlets. The book is described as such:

This astonishing book explores the delusional imaginings of Russia’s past by the pseudo-scientific ‘Alternative History’ movement. Despite the chaotic collapse of two empires in the last century, Russia’s glorious imperial past continues to inspire millions. The lively movement of ‘Alternative History’, diligently re-writing Russia’s past and ‘rediscovering’ its hidden greatness, has been growing dramatically since the collapse of Communism in 1991. Virtually unknown in the West, these pseudo-historians have published best-selling books, attracted widespread media attention, and are a prominent voice in Internet discussions about Russian and world history. Alternative History claims that Russia is much older than Ancient Egypt, Greece and Rome; that the medieval Mongol Empire was in fact a Slav-Turk world empire; and that, in the twentieth century, duplicitous foreign powers stabbed Russia in the back and stole its empire. For its followers the key to Russia’s greatness in the future lies in ensuring that Russians understand the true wealth of their past. Alternative history has become a popular therapy for Russians still coming to terms with the reality of Post-Soviet life. It is one of the forces shaping a new Russian nationalism and an important factor in the geopolitics of the twenty-first century.

To purchase ebook: https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=vY00DwAAQBAJ&rdid=book-vY00DwAAQBAJ&rdot=1&source=gbs_vpt_read&pcampaignid=books_booksearch_viewport

Partially online here: https://books.google.com/books?id=vY00DwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&vq=PUTIN#v=onepage&q=PUTIN&f=false

Turning first to page 41, with regard to Fomenko, we read the following, which is the end of Chapter Two, leading into the beginning of Chapter Three:

—=—

Begin excerpt:

When Communism collapsed and the new Russian state was established in 1991, there were half-hearted attempts at galvanizing popular opinion around a new sense of what it meant to be Russian. President Yeltsin appointed and expert committee ‘to establish the true nature of Russia’, and newspapers offered prizes for ‘the best definition of Russianness’. Nonetheless, the 1990’s came and went without any clear answer from the state as to who the Russians were and what Russia stood for. Even Putin when he emerged as Yeltsin’s protege and likely successor in 1999 portrayed himself as a technocrat rather than as an ideologue.

What Putin and his administration failed to develop was some sort of over-arching narrative to inspire popular support. As Graham Gill has put it, the presidential administrations of Yeltsin and Putin failed ‘to articulate a consistent narrative embodying a vision of either Russia’s future or of how it was to be constituted …. No presidential vision has become embedded in the public lore of the society’. Instead of a widely accepted ‘national idea’ that described Russia’s new circumstances and inspired enthusiasm among ordinary people, an ideological void emerged, which was soon filled by a cacophony of competing voices that ranged from Communists to ultra-nationalists, from the Orthodox Church to neo-Pagan occultists, and from Eurasianist empire builders to national separatists. Russia’s rulers soon came to fear that they might have built their new state upon the ideological equivalent of quicksand.

It is this fear of having no firm historical foundation in place that lies behind the increasingly desperate efforts of Putin and his allies, from the mid 2000’s, to write a ‘usable history’ that explains and justifies the new post-Communist Russia. We get a sense of how important the post-Communist elites view the writing of history from the reflections of Putin himself. From Putin downwards, there is little patience with the multiplicity of views and competing interpretations that are the stock-in-trade of conventional history writing. In 2007, Putin told a gathering of schoolteachers that there was a need for a new primer in Russian History to overcome the confusion and errors contained in the dozens of school texts then in use.

The result was a text credited to Fillipov that became notorious among its liberal critics for reinventing Stalin as an effective state builder who made occasional mistakes. The logic of this text implied that the authoritarian rather than the liberal rule worked best for Russia. Leon Aron has argued that Putin and his administration’s understanding of history can be summarized in two axioms:

The first axiom appears to be this: although there were ‘mistakes’ and ‘dark spots’, what mattered was the survival and strengthening of the state–by whatever means necessary. And by that standard, the Soviet Union was a glittering success, and the costs were justified… the second axiom of modern Russian history according to Putin is that the Soviet Union was a ‘besieged fortress’, forever under the threat of attack by the West, and that the machinations of the West were responsible not only for Soviet foreign policy but also for a great deal of domestic misfortune. The overarching aim of this and all future historical narratives is the ‘normalization’ of the monstrosity of Soviet totalitarianism, the manufacture of justifications and excuses for its crimes.

As Brandenberger has put it, Fillipov’s textbook did not explicitly rehabilitate Stalin, but rather established the justification for authoritarian rule. Russia’s survival depended upon a ‘500-year political tradition which demanded that power be concentrated in the hands of a single, autocratic ruler and his centralized administrative system’. Thus, Russian unity and strength from above will better safeguard Russian national interests than grassroots political parties, social movements, or civic organizations.

In 2009, President Medvedev declared that Russia’s history had undergone a process of falsification during the 2000’s, and that in recent times the atacks from abroad had become more angry and aggressive. His answer to this problem was to establish the Presidential Commission of the Russian Federation to Counter Attempts to Falsify History to the Detriment of Russia’s Interests, which would operate from 15 May 2009 to 14 February 2012. Putin and Medvedev entrusted staunch allies from their political retinue with the task of fashioning this history. Key figures in these efforts are the Speaker of the Duma and Chairman of the Russian Historical Society, Segie Naryshkin, and the Minister of Culture and Chairman of the Russian Military-Historical Society, Vladimir Medinskii. The president of the Commission charged with protecting Russian history was Naryshkin. No doubt conscious of the accusations of Orwellian thought control that the Commission would attract, Naryshkin assured his listeners that his organization never intended to make historians speak with one voice. Instead, the Commission’s aim was to rebut the harmful propaganda that had been directed at Russia as a result of the rewriting of history in other countries.

Like Fillipov’s textbook, Naryshkin’s commission signaled the regime’s intentions but did not immediately solve the problem. Obviously dissatisfied with the results of previous attempts to end the ‘porridge in the head’, the re-elected President Putin in 2013 outlined yet another attempt to establish a new historical regime. He ordered the Ministry of Education, the Russian Academy of Sciences, and the Historical Society to collaborate in producing textbooks without ‘contradictions and ambiguities’. The textbooks are expected to emphasis patriotism, Russian Orthodoxy, civic mindedness (grazhdanstvennost), the must ethnic nature of Russia, and its mighty civilizational and martial achievements.

Happily, some of this work was already being undertaken at a popular level. Alternative history is much too radical to be embraced in full by government officials, let alone Putin. Yet, as we shall see, there is good reason for thinking that Putin and his ideologies are borrowing ideas from alternative history to pupulate their own hitherto dreary, unimaginative, and, often, absent narrative about what post-Communist Russia stands for. It is not too much to suggest that alternative history and regime propaganda are moving in the same direction, just at different speeds.

Putin’s propagandists have recently discovered what has been well described in the scholarly literature as ‘civilizational nationalism’. Russia’s imperial restoration will need ideas and enthusiasm, and not just oil and gas, thus:

The Kremlin’s canonization of the idea of a special thousand-year civilization that predetermines a ‘special path’ for Russia is gradually elevating to the rank of an official ‘one true doctrine’ to replace Marxism-Lenonism. An army of paid and unpaid propagandists are mining this vein of gold, turning a theory into a political technology (art).

This ‘army of paid and unpaid propagandists’ contains a good many regiments of alternative historians and the readers with whom they are in conversation. Precisely because of its unabashed nationalism, alternative history has foreshadowed the type of ‘political technology’ that Putin and his administration is likely to deploy in order to resolve the complicated issue of Russian identity. A radicalized ethnographies-nationalism might yet shape public opinion in unpredictable ways, enhancing the potential for a new Russian Revolution. Tamed and harnessed, however, ‘civilizational nationalism’ may provide the glue that the present administration needs to maintain its grip on power.

Chapter Three: Empire, Nation, Nationalism

‘The most effective way to destroy people is to deny and obliterate their own understanding of their history.’

–George Orwell

Part One: Russia’s Multiple Identities

To make sense of alternative history, we first need to explore in more detail Russia’s identity crisis. Fomenko entitled his major work Imperiia or Empire, a word that has much more positive connotations in Russia than it does in the West. Empire, for Fomenko and for many Russians, means the repository of political and economic power projected across a huge geographic era. This meaning is very different to Lenin’s concept of exploited and subjected colonial peoples. This positive view of the imperial past is reflected in the fact that the overwhelming majority of Russians have found it impossible to distinguish between Russia as nation-state and Russia as empire. Thus the term ‘nationalism’, in the context of Russia, is a problematic one.

The growing vitality of nationalism has been one of the most remarked upon aspects of the post-Communist history of Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. The context for Fomenko is the collapse in 1991 of the Soviet Union, the Communist state that more or less occupied the territory inherited from the Tsarist Empire. The Soviet Union’s principal successor state, the Russian Federation, is the world’s largest state even if it is only half the size of its Communist and Tsarist predecessors. Politically and geographically, modern Russia occupies the same space today as it did approximately three hundred years ago in the era of Peter the Great. Since the collapse of Communism, Russian intellectuals and political commentators have sought out solid ground in order to make sense of Russia’s new geography and its diminished place in the hierarchy of the world’s great powers…

As for why alternative historians have made such fantastic claims about Russia, it must be remembered that Russian alternative history is in competition with the alternative history of other national groups. The writers under consideration in this book have found themselves in a contest with their counterparts in Ukraine, Central Asia, and the Turkic peoples within the Russian Federation. Popular, as distinct from state-inspired, chauvinism was frowned upon in Tsarist and Soviet times. Only in the last two decades has nationalism become part of a public conversation about the merits of rival ethnic histories. As Shnirelman has put it:

For people who believe they have been deprived of their cultural legacy, invention of the past becomes a powerful instrument–first, for the raising of self-esteem and the re-evaluation of their position among other peoples, and second, for demanding special rights and privileges with respect to others who lack their glorious past…

Since the 1980’s, a huge literature has developed around terms such as patriotism, nations, and nationalism. Patriotism seems less problematic and can be defined as strongly positive feelings towards one’s homeland. As for the term ‘nation’, Hobsbawm distinguishes between the nation as citizenship, ‘in which the nation consists of collective sovereignty based in common political participation’, and the nation as ethnicity, ‘in which the nation comprises all those of supposedly common language, history, or broader cultural identity. Gellner came up with the most enduring definition of nationalism itself when he wrote that ‘Nationalism is primarily a political principle which holds that the political and the national unit should be congruent’. While definitions are important, assigning ethnic groups to a particular homeland has proved more challenging…

After Peter, it took another century for Russian rulers to formulate an official vision of what Russia was. Under Tsar Nicholas the First and his Minister for Education, Uvarov, the trinity of ‘Autocracy, Orthodoxy and Narodnost’ was coined. Narodnost is deliberately vague in the way it evokes a bond between the peoples of Russia and the land they occupy. It was in effect an antidote to nations within the Russian empire seeking their own states. Its aim was to bind the people of Russia together by suggesting that they were special and morally superior to the West…

End Excerpt.

–Earlier in the book, from page 14, we read:

Begin Excerpt.

In the immediate aftermath of the collapse of Communism, Russian universities were in an especially parlous economic position. In the 1990’s, history writing, like the Russian state itself, entered a state of flux. The erstwhile conformism of Soviet academia collapsed from within as some historians defended the Communist past, others became trenchant critics of the former regime, and the majority looked anxiously to see which way the political wind was blowing. Their Western counterparts were keen to investigate and publish materials relating to the more sensational aspects of the Soviet period such as the Stalinist purges. But in Russia and the West, there was only a limited market for scholarly ruminations on arcane controversies connected to Russias ancient and medieval past.

It was into this virtually empty space that alternative historians, led by the likes of the New Chronology movement of Anatolii Fomenko and Gleb Nosovskii, ventured. Fomenko (1945-) is a renouned mathematician who has belonged to the academic staff of Moscow State University since the Soviet era. He is a member of Russia’s Academy of Sciences, a professor with a doctorate in applied physics and mathematics, head of the Mechanical-Mathematical Department of Moscow State University, and author of more than one hundred and eighty scientific works. He has written dozens of well-respected monographs and textbooks in his specialist field of mathematics. Fomenko was awarded Russia’s State Award in 1996 for his scientific achievements. The qualifications of Nosovskii (1958-) include a PhD in physics and mathematics. More notoriously, they are the authors of more than one hundred publications dealing with Russian and world history. The volume of their output is astonishing and reflects both of their enthusiasm and their mass-production methods as different members of their team specialize in different periods and locations. Since the collapse of Communism, New Chronology has thrived as a publishing phenomenon, despite and partly because of the hefty criticisms directed at it from conventional scholars. It has become better known in the West too, attracting the attention of scholars who are concerned about its impact upon ordinary Russians’ understanding of history and Russia’s place in the world. The English language title of Fomenko’s magnum opus is History: Fiction or Science. Fomenko’s ambition is to replace the existing ‘fiction’ with the ‘science’ of alternative history. Fomenko and New Chronology represent a popular rebellion against the version of history preferred by Russia’s scholarly elite. Or, as one scholar has put it, New Chronology is a prime example of ‘the conjunction between conspiracy theory and the rewriting of history [that] makes up one of the main instruments for disseminating nationalist theories in today’s Russia, theories based on a kind of post-modern, paranoid cultural imaginary.

The number of critics of Fomenko and his fellow alternative historians has certainly grown in recent years, and there have been premature announcements of New Chronology’s imminent demise. Yet alternative history has shown a remarkable capacity to absorb the blows inflicted by its critics and move forward, its momentum enhanced rather than deflated. So far, alternative history has not succeeded in winning over the academic departments of major universities, nor has it replaced the existing school textbooks. The alternative strategy is not to outscore the professional historians in a debate of a particular controversy or time period. Rather, the plan is to render conventional scholarship irrelevant by winning over the book-buying public and Russia’s growing army of internet users. Their passion is expressed in their apocalyptic version of patriotism for, in the words of one alternative historian:

When a nation maintains her historical memory, she will fight not only for material values, but also for the honor of the state (derzhava)… But if this nation is forced to abandon traditional national values and substitute instead a set of alien principles, then this nation is like a giant that was defeated not by the sword, but poisoned with a substance that darkens the mind and paralyses the will.

–End Excerpt

—=—

What would a nation, an empire, be without its historical source and reason for existence? The answer to this question is always the same – the more force that is used against the common people signifies the further away from its original purpose and ideals the empire has gotten. In America, we are under military rule, martial law, via the invocation of war powers (emergency) and the subsequent soft suspension of the constitution. We are made to believe we live in independent states just as in colonial history, that we are actually part of the state we live in instead of just foreign US residents, yet we are all birthed into the nation, into Washington DC, a district wholly outside and foreign to any of the 50 individual States. The union is no longer controlled by the States, the States are controlled by the empire corporation called “United States”, seated outside of and foreign to any State. Yet the appeal to the romantic history of the original thirteen colonies-turned-States after their war and struggle for independence is all we hear about, a false narrative used to justify the exact tyranny and oppression of a federal government that the King of England possessed while using the Crown’s appeal to its own history and right to rule over the corporations (colonies) set up by it. The Russian Federation (federal government district) is, to its various member states, not at all dissimilar to what the United States federal government is to the 50 states United – an illegitimate (de facto) dictator.

In other words, every present-day nation is an appeal to history. Every revolution is an appeal to history. Every law is an appeal to history. Every elected and appointed official is an appeal to history. The political process is an appeal to history. If you ask the president of the United States what makes his flattering title and dictatorial war powers legitimate, he will say “the people”. If you ask the people the same question, they will make an appeal to history — he was voted in at some point and that’s the way it has been since before I was born. That’s how the system works. Really? I’m sure lab rats and zoo animals think the same exact thing while rotting in the cages they were born in…

—=—

“The most successful tyranny is not the one that uses force to assure uniformity
but the one that removes the awareness of other possibilities,
that makes it seem inconceivable that other ways are viable,
that removes the sense that there is an outside.”

–Allan Bloom, “The Closing of the American Mind”

—=—

Of course, every nation has its own, personalized history, a justification for its current and future existence linked inextricably to the past. Therefore, each kingdom must balance itself ever so carefully upon the lies that constitute each individually perspective history of the multiplicity of demented, endlessly providential, manifest destiny attributed to every empire. And God is always somehow on the side of every nation, a petty excuse on the Grandest of scales for inexcusable actions in both war and peace, which also means that God is at the same time against every nation too — the paradox of a false attribution to the empty idols of deity — many nations under and over their own version of God

I imagine that, at the time when the American civil war was ending, the empire of the federal United States under its illegitimate emergency war powers, which had just decimated half of its own unionized states to the south, must have had a very similar crisis of conscious about their own perceived history, and likely had the same conversations about conserving the good, reimagining the bad, and essentially reinventing United States history to justify their own federalized, standing army so demonized in the Declaration of Independence. Let’s say it was a war over slavery… yeah, that’s it, we had to free the slaves! We’ll be heroes! And the common, illiterate dupes will never know the difference… 

But the greatest takeaway from this is in the term itself: alternative history. If history were true in the first place, there could be no alternative. Truth, you see, has no alternative. It’s the truth. You cannot have two differing (alternative) truths about the same thing. And so I stress again that history is never truth, but only the empire’s foundational propaganda that seeks to justify the purpose of its modern and future (post-modern) existence.

But there’s an even darker side to history. You see, the history of nations, being the story of each nation’s purpose to exist, is always a sociopath. The history of each nation is as the Narcissus admiring its own reflection, warring against any enemy that might cause ripples in the clear historical view of itself. Revisionist history is like breaking the vanity mirror of ones false appearance, like wiping the lipstick from a pig, for every nation loves only itself while hiding behind imaginary borders, fictitious lines drawn in imaginary sand that pretendedly say do not cross.

Indeed, history is not merely a story told, it is the very identity of all false existence. History is always the past, and he that controls the past controls the future. The future is everything after history, including most parts of the more recent past. One has to wonder what could possibly keep the United States empire and union of states together if it weren’t for the viral history of Philadelphia and the continental congress. Viral history… it’s like a disease. It prevents betterment. It ensures nepotism, and subsequently, despotism. And, like any other corporation out there that had humble beginnings, where we meagerly, obsucrely came from is and always will be the greatest tool of manipulation possible.

History represents the success stories of empire, the fish story no one in their right mind and reason should believe in. For history is never truth. It simply cannot be. Nothing made by men is natural. Nothing invented by man is truth. And truth cannot be revisioned… unless, that is, you call it history.

Now imagine if suddenly, instead of existing to please the historical narrative, we acted as if the reason and purpose for our existence is to ensure the future? Imagine if we lived for a better tomorrow, instead of using yesterday to justify our God-awful actions of today? Imagine if history did not dictate the present, and that, therefore, the future was something other than ensuring the continuity of government, or in other words, insuring the new feudalism of modern empire will continue into tomorrow. Imagine what you could do to serve others, to live for the purpose of preserving Life and the Source of Life, the highest Law, instead of merely preserving the emptiness of history’s inventions, the despotism of empire.

History can only ever be the popular alternative to truth.

Here’s one for the road…

Now there’s revolution… but they don’t know what they’re fighting…

—=—

.

Clint > richard-son (Realitybloger.wordpress.com)
Thursday, July 18, 2019