Leave a comment

14 Comments

  1. Clint: Well said!! Exposure is “not enough”…it’s just the beginning. Everyone wants to deal with the ‘global’ level but nobody wants to deal with your neighbor or your boss…that’s where the real work is. I’m including a letter that I sent to the Gambles, hoping they would engage on a local level but received no response:
    Kimberly and Foster Gamble:
    Just finished watching your movie… phenomenal. However, it created a profound feeling of frustration for me. I know you had a lot of information that you needed to cover on a global and national level…however, there is a piece of missing information that is critically needed for the everyday American who is directly engaged with the power structures (i.e. child protective services, food stamps, criminal justice and city government) and is falling victim everyday to the corrupt “elite agenda” that is localized in their county or city. The global model that you addressed is entrenched in every city in the USA. It is extremely dangerous for any individual (including groups) to speak out and address the actual realities of this corruption without having a very sophisticated strategy for undermining these hidden, powerful and wealthy alliances that control a community. I am speaking from personal experience.
    I would really like to talk with you because I believe that I could develop a working strategy that could be applied as a model for protecting activists and every day citizens when dealing with the corrupt systems that are pervasive in our local governments. With your help and feedback, we could put this strategy on your website. Banking your money with a local credit union is great…if you have money. However, the reason why this global control agenda is able to take hold is because they can control the people who do not have money or jobs. This population has been growing exponentially for the last decade… these are the people that are “living in the trenches.”
    I have had eight years of experience fighting an elite and politically powerful group within a state institution. I did succeed with the help of my allies in ousting a very corrupt and violent university president who had been holding his office for over 17 years. However, my life was in jeopardy during the latter part of my activism. Reading inspirational stories is not enough, you have to be able to get inside

    Reply
    • Reading inspirational stories is not enough, you have to be able to get inside the mind of the abusers while maintaining your integrity in order to disable their control mechanisms.

      Reply
      • Agreed. This is called empathy, and it goes both ways. Understanding your enemy and his lack of empathy is paramount to the process. For the enemy certainly understands you!

        Reply
    • Well stated…

      I will always consider Foster Gamble and associates nothing but wealth elite heirs of the Procter and Gamble fortune. Until this can be proven otherwise, I would certainly not put my faith in this family to save us from corporate greed and corruption. Remember that this is the same bloodline as all presidents and corporate heads – the royal bloodline. Procter and Gamble did not become what it is randomly. It’s all in the family…

      Remember there are no heroes but you, and this movie was yet another exposure of tyranny with the goal of nothing but exposure, not solutions. Sure, they will pretend to fight for the common man, but will never succeed. They will offer a “solution hub” and central website, but agian this is all being done in the social media construct – the Matrix. Their website is not the real world.

      They did not respond to my emails or requests for funding for Walter Burien and myself either, so don’t feel too bad.

      Congrats on your victory, and on maintaining your life in the process!!!

      -Clint-

      Reply
  2. Robert Deatrick

     /  May 13, 2013

    As always, I appreciate your shared insights Clint, and I agree that the shock jocks are nothing more than an extention of the already controlled corporate media in an effort to net those who would seek “alternative media” but what exactly can I do to assert myself as a natural man and take back my own power to live without being subjected to the government’s imposed tyranny?

    If I mail my social security card back to the IRS with a note stating that I no longer need it nor wish to participate or be recognized as one of their “commodities” then I am for all intents and purposes unemployable for no one will hire me without a tax ID number. If I refuse to trade the FED’s funny money with their secret society logos stamped all over it (ie, pyramid, all seeing eye, etc.) then I essentially forfeit the ability to engage in any economic activity such as buying food, paying rent, etc. If I insist that to drive an automobile is the right of a natural man and not a privledge of an artificial person and fail to present a drivers’ license, I will be taken to jail by the first cop who pulls me over.

    I have no idea how I may represent myself in a “court of law” without falling into the trap of imposed and misintended personhood. I don’t believe even a lawyer could guide me safely through such pitfalls if I could afford one and found one with enough integrity to try. Even you yourself were subject to harrassment and frisking at the airport regardless of how many times you made the assertions of a “self-actualized man”. I’m not sure there is a practical solution unless lone gunmen start taking out multinational corporate board meetings, G20 summits, CFR, Trilateral Commission and Bilderberg meetings and capitol hill lobbyists rather than schools, restaurants and cinema goers…

    (And that last comment will likely land me on the NSA’s terrorist watchlist.) Maybe you wouldn’t advocate taking any such actions as those listed above; they were just some of the examples of the suggested solutions of other “alternative media” personalities. This whole semantics game of “legal” versus “conversational” terminology is a sad and twisted joke. What are true patriots to do?

    Reply
    • Hi Robert…

      I see that you have just fallen for all of the fallacies that I did. I believed in certain things and those beliefs (not the actual things) ruled my life and the path I walked in it. Belief is the most powerful tool being used against you. And so I would simply ask you to go and prove the points you have made hear for yourself so as to prove the veracity of the claims you are making. This is what I did as I challenged my own misconceptions, and now I challenge all of my own beliefs until they are either proven fact or fallacy.

      With that said, let’s explore a few of your thoughts.

      First of all, you do not have to assert yourself as a natural man. This is your natural state of being – a human being. It requires no effort on your part. You can never stop being natural. The fact is that you must indeed assert yourself to be an artificial person. You must agree to be one and sign contracts stating such, for an artificial person is created by your “signature”. You must accept the rights given to you that are opposed to your natural rights. And you must act as an artificial person to be one. It is in your capacity to either exercise or not exercise your artificial person. It is your choice, even if it seems there is no choice. It is all based on consent – a voluntary state of contract (agreement) under the capacity of your choice. You have never lost your power, you have only agreed unilaterally to relinquish it.

      Please understand that the following is not legal advice and that I am not now or ever will be an attorney at BAR, and would be deeply insulted if the assumption that I was practicing law were made, an assumption hereby rebutted.

      You cannot just mail your social security card back to the SSA and say I am done. They do not care what you think or want in a non-legal capacity. The Social Security Card is not your property in the first place. It is a number that is owned by government. You are allowed to use it by consent and nothing else. The number is not you, it is a fictional person representing you. If you really wish to ditch this artificial number of the beast (government) then you must do so in the proper legal capacity. You must make non-existent the original application that created this number on your behalf. This is a legal Social Security Administration form named (SSA-521). Here is the link –> http://www.ssa.gov/online/ssa-521.pdf

      Once the original application has been removed, it is as if the SS# never existed in your capacity. From this point there are other forms that destroy the links to this now non-existent Social Security number, such as IRS Form 56, which essentially cancels your subscription to the IRS as a “taxpayer”. Here is a description of this action:

      “A fiduciary files Form 56 to notify the IRS about any changes in a fiduciary relationship. A fiduciary manages assets that belong to another person or organization. Form 56 is filed at both the start and the end of the relationship. This form changes the estate’s notification address to the fiduciary’s address so federal agencies and creditors can send mail regarding the estate to the fiduciary. The form’s main purpose is to establish that the fiduciary is responsible for the accounts of the estate… The fiduciary can also file Form 5495 to remove any future responsibility to pay debts that the estate incurs.”

      I would then cancel my voter registration and driver’s license, since that license is based on this Social Security number which no longer exists.

      Of course, the government is not going to make this an easy process or explain what I am now in a step by step process, for it does not wish to loose you as a dependent slave… So the responsibility to dot all your i’s is on you, leaving no loose ends or contracts.

      Your next fallacy is that you cannot be hired without a Social Security Number or “Tax ID”. This is patently and provably false. In fact, it is quite illegal for an employer to require or demand a Social Security Number in the employment process. If one does so and states that he will not hire you without one, he has just committed discrimination of the most extreme kind and you can sue the hell out of him for this. The law is on your side in this case. Employers (corporations) are basically unpaid tax-collectors for the government. Perhaps you should ask your employer how much he is getting paid to collect your taxes for the government? But you already know the answer… a big fat 0!!! You are not required to have a social security number or tax ID to work in the United States.

      Since your goal would be to become a “non-citizen”, let’s read straight from the horses mouth what the SS Administration says about the SS number:

      “Does a noncitizen need a Social Security number?

      “Unless you are a noncitizen who wants to work in the United States, you probably do not need a Social Security number. Generally, only noncitizens authorized to work in the United States by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) can get a Social Security number. Social Security numbers are used to report an individual’s wages to the government and to determine a person’s eligibility for Social Security benefits. You need a Social Security number to work, collect Social Security benefits and receive some other government services.

      Lawfully admitted noncitizens can get many benefits and services without a Social Security number. You do not need a number to get a driver’s license, register for school, obtain private health insurance, or to apply for school lunch programs or subsidized housing. Some organizations use Social Security numbers to identify you in their records. Most, however, will identify you by some other means if you request it.

      We cannot assign you a Social Security number solely so you can get a driver’s license or a service that requires a credit check. Although many companies, such as banks and credit companies, may ask for your Social Security number, you generally are not required to provide one if you don’t have one.”

      Link–> http://www.socialsecurity.gov/pubs/media/pdf/EN-05-10096.pdf

      You, however, are not applying for this foreign legal status “non-citizen”. In fact, even better – you would become a “national” and would not need this number for anything you do. The fact is that you simply do not need this number any more than you need a driver’s license for any other purposes than commercial driving. It is not ID. It is not required.

      As far as Federal Reserve Notes (dollars) you are mistaken again. Because government has created a monopoly on money, you can certainly use it under duress. You really have little choice in the matter. The only way the government can demand taxation and other benefits from your use of its “funny money” is if you are participating in some form of “commerce”. You would still be paying local and State taxes (if you so choose) that are lawfully charged – such as a gas tax to pay for road repair, etc. However, there are forms at all retail outlets for exemption from these taxes as well. Most rational men do not mind paying a rational tax, and it is a misconception that tax avoidance creates a lack of revenue for government. Most local and sales taxes pay for everything you would be using in your travels, as opposed to the IRS tax – a scam by a for-profit corporation incorporated in Guam. Bottom line, if you are never acting in commerce, you are never liable for any tyrannical tax from a government that only regulates commercial activities.

      Now onto “driving”…

      You cannot drive an automobile as a natural man. Driving is a commercial activity only done by artificial persons. It is one thing to be pulled over as a citizen without a driver’s license. But it is a whole different game to be pulled over as a non-citizen without a license. A license is permission to conduct an illegal act. So driving without a required license is certainly illegal. But as a non-citizen (national) you have no need or capacity for such a license unless you are indeed using your car for commerce. A police officer has no authority over a non-citizen. And as long as you don’t fall into the legal contract offered by the officer or admit acting in some form of commerce (including “driving”), he cannot do a thing about your travel on public roadways. This is clear in court cases and in US CODE – the right to travel shall not be restricted.

      “The use of the highway for the purpose of travel and transportation is not a mere privilege, but a common fundamental right of which the public and individuals cannot rightfully be deprived.” Chicago Motor Coach v. Chicago, 169 NE 221.

      “The right of the citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, either by carriage or by automobile, is not a mere privilege which a city may prohibit or permit at will, but a common law right which he has under the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” Thompson v. Smith, 154 SE 579.

      “The right to travel is a part of the liberty of which the citizen cannot be deprived without due process of law under the Fifth Amendment.” Kent v. Dulles, 357 US 116, 125.

      “The right to travel is a well-established common right that does not owe its existence to the federal government. It is recognized by the courts as a natural right.” Schactman v. Dulles 96 App DC 287, 225 F2d 938, at 941.

      Your next statement is about “representing yourself in a court of law”. This is also a fallacy. Firstly, the whole “pro sie” concept is flawed, as it requires you to become your own attorney which literally means you must follow the rules of court procedure as an officer of the court. YOu would not represent yourself because you already are yourself! You would also never put yourself in the position where a judge is the one deciding your fate. It would always be a grand jury, which you would educate before the trial. Everything you would do would be through the certified mail until the actual trial, and so no judge would ever be in a position to do anything unlawful to you because you would never enter into his or her jurisdiction. And it is more likely than not that your case would be dismissed through default judgement by the court clerk if you do everything right. And it would not cost you a penny, because the lawful court cannot charge you for its “services”. Of course, this is something that you would have to educate yourself on, and I will say that nothing is easy.

      You would not represent yourself in a court of law because the courts are not lawful. You would have to place yourself in the correct court for it to be lawful.

      You say that even I was subjected to harassment and frisking at the airport. Absolutely my friend…

      I was setting up a lawsuit by allowing these officers to act on their own accord. Don’t mistake what I went through at the airport for anything but myself attempting to correct this issue by being subjected to involuntary abuse by unlawful agents of government. I could have left the airport at any time, and I could have grabbed my bags and went to my flight at any time.

      Now, because of my extreme tolerance of the evils and ignorance of these people I am going to sue the hell out of them and attempt to set a precedent for all people of the country to uphold, so that none of us are subjected to such punishment. Do not mistake this incident as anything but a sacrifice I made for one and all. I may succeed or I may not.

      I hope this helps in your frustration and fallacy. Again, I used to believe the same way as you, and then I educated myself and defeated the power of my own beliefs.

      Peace…

      -Clint-

      Reply
  3. Robert Deatrick

     /  May 14, 2013

    Thank you for the prompt and thorough reply. Obviously I have much to learn, hence my loitering around your site. Having been raised in a society conditioned to act as artificial persons and having the truth be so obscured and complicated by endless mountains of government documents written in a language I clearly do not comprehend, its difficult to think outside the box, as it were. Thanks again for taking the time to address each subject in my befuddled post above and providing references and links I can chase down on my own.

    Reply
  4. Dayna d

     /  May 16, 2013

    Please don’t tell me “Natural News” is in on this to??

    Reply
  5. marika

     /  May 16, 2013

    Good day everyone!
    After reading Clint’s comment to Robert Deatrick I must add AND confirm that the same form of enslavement is going on in many countries as well. Here is an example of an article that I just finished reading:

    Are you leaving Slovakia for more than 90 days? By not reporting it you will pay a fine!
    [original is in slovak: http://www.aktuality.sk/clanok/228848/odchadzate-zo-slovenska-na-viac-ako-90-dni-ak-to-nenahlasite-mozete-dostat-pokutu/ ]

    A Slovak citizen, who after the new year (2014) will decide to travel to other countries for a duration of 90 days or more, will be required to register with the local office of their residency (my guess – police department = welcome back to communism). A non compliance will be considered a breaking of law and fine will be issued….

    …this is a new amendment voted by Slovak congress…

    … a SaS party member (SaS = Freedom and Solidarity) Peter Osusky disagreed “This amendment is non acceptable and unreasonably invades personal freedom of travel and privacy of citizens. If citizen has no desire to terminate his permanent residency in Slovakia, it is not necessary to require him to report his stay away from his homeland even if it is for more than 90 days” He also expressed that it is not appropriate to sanction citizen if he will not comply.

    Minister of Internal Affairs Robert Kalinak (Smer – SD = Direction – Social Democracy) replied to Osusky’s argument that he understands his point, however he is convinced that government needs to have up-to-date information about its citizens. As an example for it he mentioned delivery of official mail (court orders …) Kalinak also pointed out that 90 days is standard time period where visa is issued. [end]

    There were a lot of angry comments under the article one of them was very “if people’s government can’t provide a decent economic living for its citizens than there is no wonder that they are leaving country to find an opportunity elsewhere”…

    This is issue that affects every human being living under organized form of gang-government.

    Clint thank you for your comments to the posts people leave. They are as important as the articles you write.

    Marika, NJ

    Reply
  6. While everything you said is true, I think it’s important each person considers the battles they undertake and the impact it may have on, for example, dependents. It’s an arbitrary system of “justice” where you are literally at the mercy of the beast.

    I mean, even if your argument is correct, your paperwork is correct and your procedure perfect, the law you are trying to use can be turned any way law enforcement wants, any way the judge wants. You can be the best litigator that ever walked the earth but if you challenge the wrong law enforcement officer, wrong DA, wrong judge, and you’re not part of the club (the BAR)..well, we’ve seen what can happen to perfectly innocent people.. Most people don’t know the enemy they’re fighting so they’re fighting a battle they can never win. They’re trying to force the courts with police and war powers behind them.

    And while it may be against the law for an employer to demand your ss#, they don’t have to tell you that’s the reason they’re not hiring you. They can use any excuse they want and even if you suspect that’s the reason, good luck proving it.

    Don’t take me wrong, if you’re prepared to accept the consequences and if you understand the beast you’re up against, and the harsh law of admiralty, like Clint does, go for it. But most people are not Clint.

    The bottom line is, if they deem you a threat…watch out!

    Reply
  7. marika

     /  May 22, 2013

    Clint, are you familiar with this statement/letter?

    Americans are now starting to understand that they have been living in a “fairy
    tail.” We thought our country was number one, and fighting for our freedom. Wrong. A
    good example of some the treachery committed is found in a letter Colonel Edward
    Mandel House (personal advisor to President Wilson and FDR, with close contacts to
    J.P. Morgan) wrote a letter to President Woodrow Wilson. Dr. Stanley Monteith retrieved
    it from The Intimate Papers of Colonel House, in the Yale library.

    “Very soon every American will be required to register their biological property in a national system designed to keep track of people that will operate under the ancient system of pledging.’ By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda which will affect our security as a chargeback for our fiat paper currency. Every American will be forced to register or suffer not being able to work or earn a living. They will be chattel, and we will hold the security interest over them forever by operation of the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions.Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of laden to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent forever to remain economic slaves through taxation secured by their pledges. They will be stripped of their rights, given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be none the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans out, and if by accident, one or two would figure it out, we have our arsenal – plausible deniability.”
    “After all, this is the only logical way to fund government, by floating liens and debts to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges. This will inevitably reap to us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor to this fraud,which we will call social insurance.”

    Marika

    Reply
    • I thank you for that, Marika. This is exactly what I have been trying to expound on, after it took so long to figure it all out. And yet, here is Mr. House caught in an evil monologue.

      I do want to draw attention to the fact that in my genealogical research, Mr. House and all names mentioned above are blood relations to the royals and each other. When we read what this sentence says in this regard…

      “By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda which will affect our security as a chargeback for our fiat paper currency.”

      … we see the difference between them and the general people. It is the bloodline’s security that is being “securitized” by the debt enslavement and registration of everything the general people have, including their children.

      Thanks again…

      -Clint-

      Reply
  8. Brilliant site Clint.

    Just discovered you today, via the great Deanna Spingola.

    Excellent work. Look forward to having a good wonder around this site.

    Many thanks

    Digger

    http://diggerfortruth.wordpress.com/2013/04/25/traitors-vs-truth/

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: