Cracking The Cult Of The Constitution
Part II: Squaring The Past
Welcome to Part two of this essay series. Continuing from where we left off, the comprehension in the reader that the constitution of the United States – thanks to multiple declared “national emergency’s” – is no longer a part of the current political setting in America or the world must be clear. The constitution grants no rights to men. It has no power but that wielded from its congress, interpreted by Congress’s statutory court under the Executive Branch, and whether constitutional or unconstitutional, the laws of government are enforced violently by that Executive Branch under military rule (Lieber Code). Having been verified in the U.S. Code, from within the congressional record, and through the obvious and blatant actions of Congress and the Executive, acknowledging the constitution’s suspension is a necessary step in overcoming the cognitive dissonance continuously shrouded over us through govern-ment (mind control) and the distraction of enter-tain-ment (the entering and holding of the mind). The constitution is used today as nothing more than a religious (Ecclesiastical) and unquestioning tool of justification (Justice) for government to commit atrocities in its tyranny – romanticized abuse. This understanding that the Executive Branch (the military enforcement arm) of the United States government is no longer bound to Congress (by its own choice) or by the constitution itself is a prerequisite for continuing down this road of discovery and sobriety.
If this is not clear, I would suggest going back to the prerequisite part 1 of this essay, here:
Some will turn away from this information, stating as a defense that they have faith in government and in their particular corporate church.
But how is faith defined legally within the church and govern-ment?
From black’s Law 1st edition:
FAITH. 1. Confidence; credit; reliance. Thus, an act may be said to be done “on the faith” of certain representations. 2. Belief; credence; trust. Thus, the constitution provides that “full faith and credit” shall be given to the judgments of each state in the courts of the others. 3. Purpose; intent; sincerity; state of knowledge or design. This is the meaning of the word in the phrases “good faith” and “bad faith”. In Scotch law. A solemn pledge* an oath. “To make faith” is to swear, with the right hand uplifted, that one will declare the truth.
Remember the sacramentum; the sacred oath? Remember the God Trust as the full faith and credit of the United States and its dollar that holds you, your children, and your property as surety and collateral? And don’t you wonder why the constitution would simply assume that the judgements of any court of law is automatically good for everyone in every state, very much like the doctrine of religion? Does that sound like a fair trial to you?
As a “state of knowledge”, faith represents ignorance as “belief without fact”. Is that really where God would want his children to be – lead by the bloodline of royal corporations as governments who demand faith over reason and nature? The Bible says no.
Join me now for a pictorial and documented view of the United States and its history like you’ve never seen it before…
A Dark Authority
Perhaps you, as I have for so long, have wondered where exactly the “Authority” of government comes from?
What gives police authority to beat my head, shoot, or Taze me?
What gives the president the authority to declare an emergency and militarily force all people to comply with his rules?
Does it come from the people; in the form of the consent of the governed to be ruled by force?
Well, one might very well answer yes to this question after enduring a selective public education sponsored by that same government authority. But what if 49% of the people do not agree with that lawful authority? Must they really just grin and bear its tyranny, even if the corruption in that government is so blatant and scattered all over the news as to be a way of life instead of just random events?
Can the quorum of voices of the people through their “representatives” in Congress really force all of the people to comply with its will and law through the military rule of the Executive?
Does that really sound like a free country to you – where your liberties can be stripped away from you by the vote of the other people in a majority over you? Is that a republic?
If I were to challenge this perceived authority as an individual outside of that group-think mentality, I would need to challenge each office of government, starting from the lowest level of that government Beast. I would have to follow the chain of authority of all public officials, from police to police chiefs to Sheriffs to judges to councilmen to mayors to Governors to State legislators and senators… and finally I would be re-directed all the way up to the Federal level of the Legislative, Judicial, and Executive branches and Cabinets, and then finally to the man himself – the President of the United States. For each of these officials would indeed claim to answer to the authority of the one above themselves as the origin of their own perceived legal authority, but only after trying to convince me that as one of the “people” the president actually gets his power from me. And he will say this even when I outright declare him a criminal, smiling ear to ear in arrogance at my petulance while attempting to convince me that his authority is in fact the law of the people – of myself. I am apparently “the people”, though I have no voice…
But if finally I were to then challenge the authority of the President of the United States himself… to whom would he then point above him? Is it possible that there is a power higher than the President that he claims to receive his authority from? Of course, his public answer and claim of authority would be derived in full circle back to the fallacious lowest level of the “consent of the governed” – the power of the people as a body politic of one, with only one voice – despite the 10’s or 100’s of millions who do not agree.
E Pluribus Unem – out of many, one.
So here is the true test of this word authority…
What happens when I challenge the authority of the people – of the body politic – as nothing but an authoritarian, indoctrinated mob led by government over myself and my natural rights with no clue that the people are harming themselves by their blind delegation of power to government?
What happens if I don’t agree that 51% of the people can vote to allow a corrupt government to take away my liberties, especially on known-to-be-rigged computer voting machines? And if government is based on the consent of all the people as one collective voice, what happens if one of those people no longer consents to being a part of that group-think model? What if one individual stands up and says no? Can a people really be free if any one of them are forced to obey a morally reprehensible law simply because the majority of people around them ignorantly acquiesce to granting government the authority to enforce that law? If government passes laws while in the same sentence exempting itself from its own laws, can we really call what we have in America today lawful, when the law is provably lawless?
So where can I possibly be directed to at this point to ask the people – after following this chain of mythical authority all the way to the top level of U.S. President and finally back to myself – where as part of a group of people without knowledge or comprehension I somehow authorize myself to be abused, mistreated, extorted from, stolen from, kidnapped, imprisoned, quarantined, and even killed?
Where, oh where does this authority come from?
Now that I know that the President’s power derives from myself, as one of the people, I still have the same question: Who or what gives authority to government? And for that matter, who or what gives authority to the people or to the Constitution of the United States?
I know what the answer is not, because it certainly is not me! And yet I am supposedly lumped in as a part of the people…?
It is with great horror that I must inform you that I have finally found the answer to these questions after many years of searching… and it isn’t good.
You see, we must realize that civil legal law and code – the law of men – is a law that cannot be enforced except with the use of violent force and duress. After all, what good is a Congress or a Judicial opinion if that opinion or law is not backed up by an army of security guards to force the people into accepting and obeying those laws and opinions?
So the first hard lesson we all need to comprehend is that any and all man-made law absolutely requires the force of law, either defensive or offensive. For voluntary taxes to be paid, punishments and consequences must be made to force payment of those voluntary taxes – for who would voluntarily pay for and support their own tyranny and enslavement unless forced or manipulated by govern-ment (mind control)?
Governments must make all things illegal before it can control the populace by issuing licenses to legally commit an illegal act.
And by punishing those who act without permission from government for even the most trivial of things, the authority of government is created through perceived fear. The government’s law must turn natural rights into political government granted rights (revokable privileges and benefits) in order to establish a true fascist society. And if you haven’t noticed lately, that is exactly what the federal United States government has done to America…
But still the question remains – why do 100’s of millions of people allow a few hundred congressional, judicial, and executive employees of the United States practice fascism right out in the open? Is the lack of knowledge and recognition of just what fascism is really that prevalent? Is ignorance really that blissful? Are meager benefits really worth the tyranny?
And still I must ask… Where does anyone’s authority to pass any law come from?
I have finally found the shocking answer, for all law throughout history has always been based upon a Higher Authority. In other words, God has always been the gnostic Authority of man’s law, from Cannon law to its modern perversion of ecclesiastical oppression. The question is, which god or derivative thereof was manifested in establishing the United States as a central federation of government through constitution?
The laws of the United States are codified into what is known as “U.S. CODE“. This includes the codification of the constitution of the United States.
I consulted Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, printed in 1856, for a definition of this word “code”:
CODE, legislation. Signifies in general a collection of laws. It is a name given by way of eminence to a collection of such laws made by the legislature.
This struck me as quite an odd use of language. Just what and where does this “eminence” hail from, and who exactly is granting it upon the holy U.S. Code of the United States government?
Of course, it then occurred to me that I had certainly heard government use this word before…
The 5th Amendment to the constitution – labeled as one of the “Bill of Rights” – clearly and unequivocally proclaims that your life, liberty, and property can be taken away by government with court order (due process). This is often referred to as the “Taking’s Clause“. It’s most common name though is eminent domain.
Eminent domain is a prime example of what a free country certainly is not! For if my life, my rights (liberties), and my property can simply be seized upon by a corrupt court’s opinion (the faith of the court) without my permission, in no way can any sane and rational man claim to live freely in the jurisdiction of the United States.
Bouvier’s goes on to define the words eminence and domain:
EMINENCE; A title of honor given to cardinals.
CARDINAL, ecclesiastical law. The title given to one of the highest dignitaries of the court (government) of Rome. Cardinals are next to the pope in dignity; he is elected by them and out of their body (body politic). There are cardinal bishops, cardinal priests, and cardinal deacons.
So like our president, the Pope is “elected” by cardinals (appointed representatives) who claim “eminence” (honor through title). So where does this eminence come from in the United States? And who bestowed this eminent authority upon the person who appointed these cardinals to the U.S. government? Do “the people” as a group know the will of God and somehow esoterically vote accordingly through a holy Vulcan mind meld? And if so, why do some people vote differently than other people?
DOMAIN. It signifies sometimes, dominion, territory governed – sometimes, possession, estate – and sometimes, land about the mansion house of a lord. By domain is also understood the right to dispose at our pleasure of what belongs to us. 2. A distinction, has been made between property and domain. The former (property) is said to be that quality which is conceived to be in the thing itself, considered as belonging to such or such person, exclusively of all others. By the latter (domain) is understood that right which the owner has of disposing of the thing. Hence domain and property are said to be correlative terms; the one is the active right (of the tenant) to dispose, the other (property is) a passive quality which follows the thing, and places it at the disposition of the owner.
DOMINION. The right of the owner of a thing to use it or dispose of it at his pleasure.
As tenants, citizens are not the owner of property registered with government. Property as a “passive quality” title is revokable through eminent domain by the true owner, which is government in Trust. So title of property is nothing but a positive (revokable) right (privilege) granted by government, which has dominion over your person and your property (artificial paper things and Titles).
But wait a minute! This legal definition of domain combined with the descriptive word “eminent” leads me to believe that the “Codes” passed by the legislature hold their authority directly from God Almighty… or some other god! And since when are titles of Nobility and Honor allowed in the United States against the constitution?
Oh, wait, I get it… the constitution itself is in fact a sacred set of articles granting the ultimate titles of sacred nobility!!!
Am I to understand that the representatives of the people – the congress and senate – are acting in the same capacity as Cardinals of the Catholic or other Church? Makes sense, considering that for many centuries the church has been the eminent government of most kingdoms.
When I asked a friend of his opinion on this concept, he referred me to Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition, where I found another surprising legal definition that is actual case law:
EVIL. It is an “evil” within rule that either means or end of conspiracy must be evil, to frustrate or impede a government function, whether that function is performed under a constitutional or an unconstitutional law. U.S. v. Rhoads, D.C. D.C., 48 F.Supp. 175, 176.
So according to the opinion of the courts, it is evil to impede the government while it is acting unconstitutionally?
Why am I being arrested, officer?
You’ve committed illegal evil, sir.
Oh, yes then… carry on…
In other words, it is evil to interfere with the holy eminence of government when it claims dominion over your life, your children’s life, your liberty, and your property. I seem to recall that it is evil to frustrate or impede the church as it pretends to act under God as well, but then it claims to be government too.
Now, I suppose we all have different ideas of what constitutes the word evil, but this is ridiculous! After the initial shock of this court opinion and legal definition faded a bit for me, a cold realization subsumed my soul as I realized something very important. This is nothing if not a religious opinion of a religious judicial court based upon its own delusional religious eminence and sacra-ment.
I harkened back to years of research and remembered other confounding claims of property ownership by government, which now started to make perfect sense from a religious standpoint.
Here we see the concept of domain explained on a universal scale: government owns all property, and the people are allowed to be tenants of that property as mere users once registered as citizens. And this from the congressional record!
“The ultimate ownership of all property is in the State; individual so-called “ownership” is only by virtue of government, i.e. law, amounting to mere user; and user must be in accordance with law and subordinate to the necessities of the State.” — Senate Document No. 43, 73D Congress, 1st Session, entitled: “Contracts Payable in Gold”, by George Cyrus Thorpe, submitted to the senate: April 17, 1933
“The money will be worth 100 cents on the dollar because it is backed by the credit of the Nation. It will represent a mortgage on all the homes and other property of all the people in the Nation.” –Congressman Patman, speaking from the Congressional Record of March 9, 1933, and referring to the Act of March 9, 1933.
If the United States has eminent domain over any and all property it claims, then the United States by default is technically the owner of all property in the United States (jurisdiction). In other words, it claims a dark eminence over the people and what they perceive as their personal property, but which is in fact the domain of the United States central government (a church and state). What else can one call this supposed authority of eminence over all things but righteous?
The Founding Fathers
Of The American Temple
The questions we will be answering today are: Where does this declared eminence hail from? Who or what were the founding fathers that claimed constitutional eminence over all “people”? How are the politicians of today related to those founding fathers? And from what Order of men did they then and now subscribe?
I considered for a long period the rather bold righteousness of these two congressional statements above… And that’s when it struck me – the Authority of government is not lawful in any way! It is not based on the consent of the people or upon the spirit of true justice. It is not even based on anything of or in this world. The horrifying truth is that the major governments of the world, including the United States, are claiming a uniform Authority from God… or from some other occult, godly, and etherical power unknown to most people.
But I didn’t fool myself anymore, for I knew then exactly which god it was.
I knew this almost immediately, because God’s law is the natural law. And everything the United States government does within its eminent “Code” is an attack upon that natural law and the natural rights of the people – the law of God and nature to do no harm to others or their property. U.S. Code is an absolute assault on the Ten Commandments and natural law, allowing government permission to kill, rape, pillage, and torture the enemies of its state within its eminent code. For nowadays, government hardly does anything else but harm its subjected people and eminently pronounce domain over all property and people in America, as well as the rest of the world through its military occupation and forced nation building – more commonly known as “spreading democracy”.
I understood then that my beliefs were absolutely irrelevant; my historical perspective dead wrong.
And I finally comprehended that day the truly dark nature of the Eminent Authority and Domain of this government and of that claimed by its founders. And so I went searching for the answers as to who or what their true higher Authority actually was…
The Tools Of Masonry And Law
Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856, lets us understand the deeper meaning of the words used in U.S. Codes and around the world, finding their origins in the ancient sacred geometry of Freemasonry:
RULE. This is a metaphorical expression borrowed from mechanics. The rule, in its proper and natural sense, is an instrument by means of which may be drawn from one point to another, the shortest possible line, which is called a straight line. 2. The rule is a means of comparison in the arts to judge whether the line be straight, as it serves in jurisprudence, to judge whether an action be just or unjust, it is just or right, when it agrees with the rule, which is the law. It is unjust and wrong, when it deviates from it. lt is the same with our will or our intention.
RULE OF LAW. Rules of law are general maxims, formed by the courts, who having observed what is common to many particular cases, announce this conformity by a maxim, which is called a rule; because in doubtful and unforeseen cases, it is a rule for their decision; it embraces particular cases within general principles…
In a million years I would never have guessed that the “Maxims” of law were based upon a metaphysical Masonic concept or tool of justice.
And so I looked to see how other words in this eminent legal system and language were based upon the tools of Masonry…
Of the most commonly used tools by a mason, one which does not get much attention, is the folding ruler. While the compass measures direction and the square measures angle, the rule is used to measure height and length. These modern day “rulers” used to be called a “story pole”, and in modern times have been replaced in practicality by the retracting steel measuring tape. Of course the necessity for a straight line, just as in ecclesiastical law, is paramount in masonry – the shortest distance between two points.
It is important to understand that the teachings of masonry are dualistic, using the tools of building and measurement as “metaphoric expressions” for the character of a man as a Freemason.
For example, the “Square” is one of the most important tools in Freemasonry. Besides being the first working tool in the Second Degree, it is also the Second Great Light.
The Plumb Rule is the emblem of integrity. The Plumb Rule consists of a weight hanging freely at the end of a line; the principle that actuates it is the influence of gravity. No matter where it is placed, it always points to the centre of the earth. So it is in the spiritual world, but here it points unerringly to God.
Note here that pointing downward to the center of the earth as opposed to pointing up to the heavens is represented as pointing to “God”. Perhaps I am mistaken, but rumor has it that something or someone else hangs out down there…
In the Third Degree, the Skirret is an implement which acts on a centre pin, whence a line is drawn to mark out the ground for the foundation of the intended structure. Symbolically, the Skirret points out that straight and undeviating line of conduct laid down for our pursuit in the Volume of the Sacred Law; and so to “square”, “level” and “upright” we must add “straight”. “Straight” is defined as the shortest distance between two points; and in our dealings with God, our neighbour and ourselves, we find that the shortest path is that which is straight. We can easily be tempted to take an easier path and so forsake the straight, perhaps at first just a little, but that “little” can become a habit. To keep on the straight requires restraint, which is rarely easy.
The Chisel is the last of the three working tools of the First Degree, and rightly so, because the Chisel should never leave our hand. As our ritual tells us: “the Chisel points out the advantages of education, by which means alone we are rendered fit members of every civilized society“. “Points out the advantages of education” — and is that not the whole theme of the Second Degree? There we are exhorted to extend our researches into the hidden mysteries of nature and science. “Science” in that use is the ancient word for knowledge, and education is the acquisition of knowledge, the way to which lies up the Winding Staircase. As the workman, with the aid of a chisel gives form and regularity to the shapeless mass of stone, so education by cultivating ideas and polishing rude thoughts transforms the ignorant savage into the civilised being.
The Chisel furthermore demonstrates the advantages of discipline. The mind like the diamond in its original state is unpolished, but by grinding away the external coat we are enabled to discover the latent beauty of the stone. Thus education discovers the latent beauties of the mind, and draws them forth to range over the field of matter and space in order to display the summit of human knowledge, our duty to God and man.
Why do judges use a gavel in their court proceedings?
The Gavel, we are told, represents the force of conscience, which, of course, is the voice of our own soul, or as our ritual puts it “the voice of nature” and the “centre from which we cannot err“. It is this inner voice that is ever ready to warn us when without it we would err. If we let conscience guide us, and are prompt to heed it, we will find its voice becoming stronger and clearer with every day of our lives; but, if we fail to heed it, failure becomes a habit, and its voice will eventually become so weak that it is barely audible, so that finally there is no warning at all and its owner becomes a really evil person.
Conscience, like the Gavel, will “knock off all superfluous knobs and excrescence’s” so that the rough stone of our character will become the Perfect Ashlar fit for the Temple.
“The Latin assis was a board or plank; in the diminutive form, assula, it meant a small board, like a shingle, or a chip. In this connection it is interesting to note that our “axle” and’ “axis” were derived from it. In early English this became asheler and was used to denote a stone in the rough as it came from the quarries. The Operative Masons called such a stone a “rough ashlar,” and when it had been shaped and finished for its place in the wall they called it a “perfect ashlar.” An Apprentice is a rough ashlar, because unfinished, whereas a Master Mason is a perfect ashlar, because he has been shaped for his place in the organization of the Craft.“
– Source: 100 Words in Masonry
(Top) Crude Ashlar
(Bottom) Finished or Perfect Ashlar
The Builder was published from 1915 to 1930 by
the National Masonic Research Society.
Nearly a century later, it has yet to be surpassed in terms of quality of content.
Begin Excerpt from source:
“The Builder”, December 1916
Our lodge is in every respect a symbolic workshop, furnished with all the tools belonging to the different grades of workmen, and with a trestleboard upon which are set forth the day’s designs and the material upon which the labor of the brethren is to be expended.
This symbolic material consists of the two ashlars, emblematic of the crude material and the finished product, which are placed plainly enough on view in New York lodges, but absent or almost unknown except to students in many other states. The oblong stones and nondescript slabs sometimes seen are noteworthy evidence that the age-old significance of the “cubical stone,” which has played such a prominent role in the mythology and mysticism of the past, has almost run to oblivion in the modern craft. These stones should really be perfect cubes. The symbolism of the working tools is completely lost the moment such proportions are lost sight of or ignored. The ancient Hebrews had their own version of the great “number philosophy,” which lent sanctity and expressiveness to the number 12. First of all, it was the number of their Twelve Tribes, who were doubtless a symbolical enrollment of all the heads of families under the zodiacal sign of the month in which they were born. It is certainly significant that the patriarchal system was founded upon this number, and later on many other dispositions were made that showed a particular reverence for the Chaldean plan of the universe based upon 12 signs. As one cube possesses six sides each of which is a perfect square, a number of remarkable mathematical and geometrical symbolisms were established based upon the fact that all the numbers, from one to 12 added together produce 78. This number is also the sum of 3 times “26,” the numerical value of the “Great and Sacred Name of Jehovah” (JHVH).
As each cube possesses 12 edges, the combined number require a 24-inch rule to symbolize their total outline. The breaking into different mathematical combinations of this supreme number, each significant of some one of the great ruling phenomena of nature, was seen in the symbolism of the use of an operative Mason’s gavel in the dressing of building stones.
The grand old mystery name of our Creator, called the Tetragrammaton (Greek for “four-letter name”) had as its root the three letters J, H, and V, which as numbers were 10, 5, and 6, or 21, the sum of the added numbers 1 to 6 represented by a single cube.
This fact was made the basis of a curious legend, ought by the wise old rabbis into that marvelous compilation called the Talmud, from which more than a little of our Masonic material has been derived.
The story is of the Patriarch Enoch (Hanok, father Methuseleh), whose name means “the initiator,” 10, all accounts agree, lived 365 years, or a “year of years.” A remarkable book attributed to him is often alluded to by the Hebrew commentators and early Christian “Fathers”; but no trace of it was ever found until in the last century it turned up in Abyssinia. It has been translated out of that strange African dialect into many tongues. The so-called Book of Enoch contains a remarkable recital of astronomical science as known to the ancients, told entirely in allegorical form, while the history of the Children of Israel is prophesied ( ?) under the allegorical simile of the remarkable doings of a singularly intelligent flock of sheep which build a house for their shepherd, the whole reading very much like a children’s fairy tale.
The Talmudic legend of Enoch represents him as greatly disturbed at the news of the impending world Deluge,” for fear the Name of God should be lost. He accordingly caused it to be inscribed upon a triangular plate of gold, and affixed it to a cubical stone, for the safe keeping of which he caused a series of nine arched vaults to be constructed, one beneath another, at the foot of Mt. Moriah (the holy mountain of the Jews, as Mt. Meru was of the Hindus). The rains came and the flood descended, and so washed the mud and silt over the site that it became completely obliterated.
Centuries later, when King David was moved “to build an house unto the Lord,” and actually set his workmen to dig the foundations thereof, the latter discovered the vaults, and descending therein brought to light the long-buried stone.
Tradition also has it that the material of this stone was agate, which would at once connect it with the Hermetic philosophy; for agate, above all, was sacred to Hermes and Thoth or David. The latter, having been a warlike monarch, was not permitted to achieve that which he had begun and so bequeathed the cubical stone to his son Solomon, who made use of it as the cornerstone of the Temple.
The imagery of this is plain enough in the fact that, not in a written or engraved inscription, but in the mathematical proportions of the cube itself, was to be found that wonderful Name which is, as it were, the foundation of the universe, of which man is a fleshly epitome and the Temple on Mt. Moriah a symbolic one.
By knowing the use of the working tools of an E. A. the initiate might begin his labor of hewing and shaping the brute matter at his feet into stones fit for the builders’ use; but when he had accomplished his task he was apprised that the symmetry and order it represented in its finished shape was “God”: not a god whom he created, but a God whom his patient labor had revealed.
The cube itself was an age-old symbol of the spiritual Man, as set forth in the Mahabarata of ancient India:
A portion of Mine own Self, transformed in the world of life into an immortal Spirit, draweth round itself the senses of which the Mind, is the Sixth, veiled in Matter.
Therefore we find the cube present in all the ancient mythologies, which were but racial cloaks for one and the same wisdom religion, understood by the priests of all countries alike as a symbol of the sixth sign of the zodiac, the characters portraying the great Mother of Wisdom and her divine son Man.
It is the task of the apprentice to break through the shell of matter and liberate the Divine Word that dwells within by opening his own spiritual perceptions to the light of the Logos. As the priceless statues of Phidias and Praxiteles were once shapeless masses of unmeaning stone and the Parthenon a sea-worn crag, until gavel and gage, mallet and chisel, in the hand of inspiration had performed their tasks, so has always been the lesson of the cube in its unshapen and shapen forms to the apprentice Mason.
Something very important has been revealed here, which we will touch upon in more detail as we progress. We must comprehend that the ancient mystery religions, including all of the modern Christian, Judaism, and Islamic faiths, were derived from this Masonic “code” and that these mythologies as allegorical stories all originate from the same source. In other words, religion itself does not shape God, but instead shapes what men do with its teachings. They each control men depending upon that mans race, culture, and preconceived beliefs. And each religion is and was created based upon the integration of race and culture into “the same wisdom religion”.
This is extremely important, as we will see, in understanding the reasons for the next World War (3) and its purpose of pitting the people (races) of all nations against each other. For the true goal in the mysteries is to establish (phoenix rising) a one world religion out of the ashes of a religious war between these “racial cloaks” called religions. The Temple is being rebuilt upon the Mount, with the purpose of inciting world Islam against the now unholy alliance of Christians and the false Jews who claim the Kingdom of Jerusalem (Israel), which we call international Zionism.
As we look around the world and view the tainted media and its “news”, as well as the so-called “Christian” evangelism promoting Israel at all costs, we see the Islamic world spreading while the now Zionist governments of once racially exclusive nations like Sweden, Germany, France, and England become overrun with Muslim immigrants.
In these videos, we can see the plan shaping up and unfolding as the battlefield is being set for a holy religious war on an international scale, all centered around Jerusalem (Israel) and its holy Temple on the Mount recently reclaimed by the Masonic powers of the world after World War II.
“All the qualities of Catholicism…”
“No figures, no images… that’s the only line (difference).”
How else do you create a holy racial religious war than to purposefully intermingle such racial religious foes until one race and religion is forced to fight for its very culture, life, and land? And what happens when you discover that this has been the plan for a very long time – to allow the common-blood “goyim” races to simply and ignorantly wipe each other off the map in a trumped up holy war?
As required reading for full comprehension here, please view my History of World Governments and their incremental takeover by international Zionism, leading to the World Jewish Congress and the reclaiming of the Kingdom Of Israel for the Plantagenet bloodline kings – a war waged by Great Britain’s alliance with that Zionist congress.
It is of the utmost importance to comprehend that the white Ashkenazim “Jews” who now inhabit Palestine (Israel) in an illegal political “State” are not Semitic in any way – they are not the Biblical Jews. And yet they hide behind the historical notion of being the “lost tribes” of the “chosen people”, and now control the major governments of the world. But in truth, the leaders of nations and religions are all of the same blood, pretending to oppose one another while secretly and collectively striving for the same goal of rebuilding the Temple of Solomon and establishing a one world religion through the religious and racial war that action will create.
The Constitution Of A Debt
It is incredibly troubling to ponder the false paradigm of religious-like zeal that Americans exude towards the constitution of the United States. Like moths to a flame, this document of debt enslavement (charter) that created this corporation known as the United States attracts the hearts of people of every age, while their minds waste away viewing a high-definition revision of world history in books and on magic movie and television screens.
Ironically, it is this very document that forged (chartered) the slave colony called the USA; a Virginia Company, and part of the East India Company.
So again, we must remember exactly what a “constitution” actually is.
We must remember that freedom means to obey the laws of government, no mater how tyrannical.
And we must remember that the constitution creates political freedom, not the state of being free men in nature.
Bouvier’s again explains…
TO CONSTITUTE, contracts. To empower, to authorize. In the common form of letters of attorney, these words occur, I nominate, constitute and appoint.”
CONSTITUTION, contracts. The constitution of a contract, is the making of the contract as, the written constitution of a debt.
CONSTITUTOR, civil law. He who promised by a simple pact to pay the debt of another; and this is always a principal obligation.
EVIL. It is an “evil” within rule… to frustrate or impede a government function, whether that function is performed under a constitutional or an unconstitutional law. U.S. v. Rhoads, D.C. D.C., 48 F.Supp. 175, 176. (From Black’s Law, above)
CONSTITUTION, government. The fundamental law of the state, containing the principles upon which the government is founded, and regulating the divisions of the sovereign powers, directing to what persons each of these powers is to be confided, and the, manner it is to be exercised as, the Constitution of the United States… The words constitution and government are sometimes employed to express the same idea, the manner in which sovereignty is exercised in each state. Constitution is also the name of the instrument containing the fundamental laws of the state. 3. By constitution, the civilians, and, from them, the common law writers, mean some particular law; as the constitutions of the emperors contained in the Code.
CODE, legislation. Signifies in general a collection of laws. It is a name given by way of eminence to a collection of such laws made by the legislature.
Now, we already know that the constitution continued the debt of the Congress into the new United States government. But what was that debt continued from?
Let’s read Article 12 of the Articles of Confederation:
Article XII. All bills of credit emitted, monies borrowed, and debts contracted by, or under the authority of congress, before the assembling of the united States, in pursuance of the present confederation, shall be deemed and considered as a charge against the United States, for payment and satisfaction whereof the said united States, and the public faith are hereby solemnly pledged.
Remember what faith is, and that you are pledged as surety for the full faith and credit of the nation.
And what is it to be pledged?
PLEGIIS ACQUIETANDIS, WRIT DE. The name of an ancient writ in the English law, which lies where a man becomes pledge or surety for another to pay a certain sum of money at a certain day; after the day, if the debtor does not pay the debt, and the surety be compelled to pay, he shall have this writ to compel the debtor to pay the same.
A man is a surety to his government assigned artificial person, and thus is a debtor to government. That debt can be forced from the surety via “due process” of government courts via similar code today. And again we see debtor prisons rising from the ashes…
PLEDGE, contracts. He who becomes security for another, and, in this sense, every one who becomes bail for another is a pledge.
PLEDGER. The same as pawner. (q. v.)
PLEDGEE. The same as pawnee. (q. v.)
PLEDGE or PAWN, contracts. These words seem indifferently used to convey the same idea… 3. Sir William Jones defines a pledge to be a bailment of goods by a debtor to his creditor, to be kept till the debt is discharged… a contract by which a debtor gives to his creditor a thing to detain as security for his debt. Lord Holt’s definition is, when goods or chattels are delivered to another as a pawn, to be security for money borrowed of him by the bailor – and this, he adds, is called in Latin vadium, and in English, a pawn or pledge. 4… according to Judge Story, it may be defined to be a bailment of personal property, as security for some debt or engagement… 5. The term pledge or pawn is confined to personal property; and where real or personal property is transferred by a conveyance of the title, as a security, it is commonly denominated a mortgage. 6. A mortgage of goods is, in the common law, distinguishable from a mere pawn. By a grant or a conveyance of goods in gage or mortgage, the whole legal title passes conditionally to the mortgagee; and if not redeemed at the time stipulated, the title becomes absolute at law, though equity will interfere to compel a redemption. But in a pledge a special property only passes to the pledges, the general property remaining in the pledger. A mortgage may be without possession, but a pledge cannot be without possession… 7. Things which are the subject of pledge or pawn are ordinarily goods and chattels; but money, negotiable instruments, actions, and indeed any other valuable thing of a personal nature, such as patent-rights and manuscripts, may, by the common law, be delivered in pledge. 8. It is of the essence of the contract, that there should be an actual delivery of the thing. 9. It is essential that the thing should be delivered as a security for some debt or engagement. –Bouvier’s, 1856
Black’s 4rth importantly adds:
Pledge… The necessary elements to constitute a contract one of “pledge” are: Possession of the pledged property must pass from the pledgor to the pledgee; the legal title to the property must remain in the pledgor; and the pledgee must have a lien on the property for the payment of a debt or the performance of an obligation due him by the pledgor or some other person-while, in a “chattel mortgage,” the legal title passes to the mortgagee subject to a defeasance… A bailment of personal property as security for a debt or other obligation. The specific article delivered to the creditor in security is also called a “pledge” or “pawn.”
So specifically, the Articles of Confederation were delivered to Great Britain and France as a pledge or pawn of America and its colonies, its current and future titled land as territories, its property, and its people as surety for debt.
The Masonic Hand
That Governs And Enforces
In retrospect, it is unfair of me to merely criticize an entire population who, like myself, grew up in government indoctrination centers called public schools. Like most parents, mine believed it was their duty to send me to a government school, and that it was my duty to pledge my allegiance to that government. I was fooled equally as well as everyone else; becoming part of the amorphous mass of brainwashed human commodities trained to be work-ready by age 18 with my hand on my heart, worshiping the corporate flag of that holy corporate district called United States.
But then in my late 20’s, as buildings were falling in New York City and military men were blocking the streets; as the world was morphing before my very eyes despite anything the constitution may or may not say – I actually read the constitution seemingly for the first time…
Over and over I poured through its legal language, defining its words, shocked at its blatant amendments, and confounded by its true history. And with the comprehension of every new Article and Amendment my belief turned to horror; the realization that I was part of something more sinister than I could ever have imagined. I realized that this corporation was literally killing in my name; with my permission – in the name of “the people”. For every crime that the United States commits is done so with its presumed consent of the people it represents… one nation that is certainly not under God.
And today, having just turned 41 this month, I have the dubious duty to report my findings on this holiest of fallacies called the United States constitution.
World peace through law???
Law = military police force, for law holds no power without force.
Force = Peace
Force = Liberty
Force = Law
So let’s talk about just who or what this trademarked
and supposed “global force for good” actually is.
Notice the Trademark symbol for this military corporation?
How does the Government define a trademark?
“A trademark is a brand name.“
Care and Compasion Hand Delivered?
Which picture is real, and which is print media propaganda?
A military needs public affairs for its commercial activities and advertising.
And somehow it has salvaged its completely corrupt and tainted reputation
among the American people who unwittingly support it through debt and tacit consent.
But is there more to the military and its “Authority” than we’ve imagined?
Clark Gable and Douglas Fairbanks – Masonic Brothers, Lodge #528, Beverly Hills
Gene Autry – 33rd Degree Mason, life Member Lodge # 185, Long Beach
Charles A. Lindbergh, Master Mason
Joe M. Jackson, Masonic Lodge #68
And what about the Commander in Chief?
Commander In Chief of the U.S. Military Barack Obama with his Masonic ring…
The Masonic handshake.
When considering the masses of enlisted soldiers in the military, we must apply the same logic and reason as we do to common members of churches and citizens under governments. Obviously, a kid straight out of high school will not be privy to the sacred secrets and mysteries held by the Masonic Generals of that Army. So it would be foolish again to compare the useful idiots (useful innocents) in the military, that would obey orders to attack their own people on command, to that of the leadership and government of the military. And of course the same holy and sacred oath apparently gives authority to those leaders and allows unquestioning soldiers to die and kill in the name of some deistic god and nation.
The profits from war, occupation, and conquest are a multitude and come in many forms. No one can dare declare this to be a false statement with a straight face. It controls the common-blood population and brings booty into the government’s sacred coffers. But we never seem to consider that the for-profit model of war is literally a corporate business of the Untied States, under the command of the Commander in Chief of that corporation.
Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition, defines the Army as:
ARMY. The armed forces of a nation intended for military service on land. An “army” is a body of men whose business is war. While the “militia” is a body of men composed of citizens occupied temporarily in the pursuit of civil life, but organized by discipline and drill, and called into the field for temporary military service when the exigencies of the country require it.
REGULAR ARMY. The permanent military establishment, which is maintained both in peace and war according to law.
There are two very important distinctions here; one between the nation and the countries within, and the other between the militia and a regular army (business). In fact, one of the chief complaints against the King within the Declaration of Independence was that:
“He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.”
And yet in stark contradiction, the constitution in Article 1, Section 8 gives the United States Legislature (Congress) the Power:
“To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years…”
“To provide and maintain a Navy…”
“To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Force…”
Of course, this deceptive language is similar to the language used for national emergencies. Like those, the “Appropriation of Money” is legislated every two years in congress in its appropriations bills – the funding of military rule and foreign and domestic occupation with public moneys out of the public debt or “God Trust”. So while the constitution states a seeming restriction, it also states how to simply work around that restriction in congress.
A standing army is just fine as long as congress consents to and supports it?
The “Federal Farmer” wrote a series of letters published in the Poughkeepsie County Journal in late 1787 and early 1788, where he predicted that under the new Constitution:
“(Congress) will have unlimited power to raise armies, and to engage officers and men for any number of years.”
“I see so many men in America fond of a standing army, and especially among those who probably will have a large share in administering the federal system; it is very evident to me, that we shall have a large standing army as soon as the monies to support them can be possibly found. An army is not a very agreeable place of employment for the young gentlemen of many families.”
“…we all agree, that a large standing army has a strong tendency to depress and inslave (enslave) the people.”
So why is it that in the American states we had individual state militias, whereas in the nation we have a standing army as a business? Just what is the difference between these two words that we so commonly intermingle without care or concern?
COUNTRY. By country is meant the state of which one is a member. 2. Every man’s country is in general the state in which he happens to have been born, though there are some exceptions. See Domicil; Inhabitant. But a man has the natural right to expatriate himself, i. e. to abandon his country, or his right of citizenship acquired by means of naturalization in any country in which he may have taken up his residence.
Ah, so a man in a country is still considered under the natural law; not being forced to submit to that government.
So what the is a nation, and why is it so important to get men to enter into the jurisdiction of the nation despite being perfectly comfortable in his or her country (state)?
NATIONS. Nations or states are independent bodies politic; societies of men united together for the purpose of promoting their mutual safety and advantage by the joint efforts of their combined strength. 2. But every combination of men who govern themselves, independently of all others, will not be considered a nation; a body of pirates, for example, who govern themselves, are not a nation. To constitute a nation another ingredient is required. The body thus formed must respect other nations in general, and each of their members in particular. Such a society has her affairs and her interests; she deliberates and takes resolutions in common; thus becoming a moral person who possesses an understanding and will peculiar to herself, and is susceptible of obligations and rights. 3. It belongs to the government to declare whether they will consider a colony which has thrown off the yoke of the mother country as an independent state; and until the government have decided on the question, courts of justice are bound to consider the ancient state of things as remaining unchanged.
NATIONALITY. The state (disposition) of a person in relation to the nation in which he was born. 2. A man retains his nationality of origin during his minority, but, as in the case of his domicil of origin, he may change his nationality upon attaining full age; he cannot, however, renounce his allegiance without permission of the government. See Citizen; Domicil; Expatriation; Naturalization…
NATIVES. All persons born within the jurisdiction of the United States, are considered as natives.
Are you a native of the United States? Do you think this legal status was a choice? It means that you were born in a state (country) and are a citizen (artificial person) of the United States (the nation).
These words are not interchangeable. In America, there are 50 countries that are members of the nation called the United States.
The United States is not a country, it is a nation.
California is not a nation, it is a country (state).
The 50 “states” of America are all individual countries bound to the nation of the United States under military force of its “spiritual jurisdiction”.
The name United States is very confusing, for it is not representative of the true nature of the countries within. The United States is nothing but the name of the corporation of a district. I could call myself “Dog” as my official name, but that doesn’t make me an actual dog. I am man. Just because the nation calls itself “United States”, that does not mean that it is a country. For the nation is a series of countries that under contract make up the body politic of that nation. The name of the government of that conglomeration of states is the “United States”.
In its simplest terms, a nation is nothing but a “jurisdiction”. It’s sort of like a masonic club, where you can check in but you can’t check out. The civil war is evidence of this fact, supported by the Lieber Code and the United States military occupation of each country (state) of its nation today. Just as a nation’s members are countries (or “states” as artificial corporations), so too are the persons who are citizens of the nation – members of the club. To claim to be a natural-born citizen of the United States means that you were born in a country (state) and are a contracted artificial person corporation of the United States jurisdiction. You are like a Starbuck’s, and there’s one of you on every corner. You see, a natural born man cannot him or herself be an artificial person. For this, the United States corporation (district) created the “14th amendment citizen” and requires you (the man) to be surety for that artificial person in order to be legally called a “citizen” – to be considered a thing instead of a living man – to be a chattel commodity instead of a sentient being.
A citizen is nothing but a piece of paper, assigned a number, and filed away in a cabinet.
But most relevant to this topic is the difference between the militias of the individual countries (states) as compared to the standing army of the nation. For the last thing that the occupying military force of the United States (nation) would desire is for the individual countries (states) to have their own military power to stand in protection of the county (state) against the Masonic United States (nation/jurisdiction). The purpose of minimizing and diminishing the State militias was to create a central army that would occupy and “keep the peace” in each country (state) in order to ensure the military rule of the nation over the countries (states).
In essence, the ability of each state to protect itself from the jurisdiction (rule) of the sovereign (ruler) has been conquered and eradicated by simply destroying the organization of the people of each country (state) as their own military force. The last thing a bully wants is for his victims to fight back.
And this is the forced contractual nature of the word “united” – a nation of tyranny over countries (states).
E Pluribus Unum – out of many (countries), one (nation)…
The Masonic Charter Of Freedom:
Constituting The United States
“Independence Hall in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA has many, many Masonic Connections. It stands on land purchased by Wm. Allen, Grand Master of PA. The ground was staked by Edmond Wolley, a Mason. Thomas Boude, the brick mason, was the first Secretary of St. John’s Lodge of Philadelphia and later Deputy Grand Master. Benjamin Franklin laid the cornerstone while Grand Master (1734) with the assistance of St John’s Lodge. Brother Andrew McNair of Philadelphia rang the bell to call the populace on July 8, 1776, to hear the reading of the Declaration of Independence. The Liberty Bell cracked in 1835 when it tolled the death of Chief Justice John Marshall, past Grand Master of Virginia.”
–Missouri Lodge of Research, “Did You Know?”, Wes Cook publisher, 1965
The comprehension that our most cherished of declarations and the corporate charter called the constitution are a fraud is very much like losing one’s faith in the religious doctrine that controls the minds of good Christians, turning them away from God and natural law. The cult of patriotism that has sprung forth from this particular religion of national constitutionalism is one that I believe must come to an end… yet another pledge of allegiance without comprehension of its consequences. For the constitution is the basis for all fairy tales and faith in and of what would otherwise be a free land and country, and it represents the very foundation of power and tyranny by the corporation for which it chartered. It grants no rights to men, for it only applies to government and artificial corporate persons. It gives no true recourse for the grievances of men, for the courts are government owned. It perverts the natural state of man and binds us in contractual chains of artificial person-hood and obligation. And it offers nothing but debt and subjection to its believers who voluntarily and falsely embrace it as God-given.
The constitution is nothing more than the foundation and Masonic cornerstone of a cult, and its leaders are steering its followers into destitution and despotism…. and world war.
This is done by continuously using the promise of freedom – a word very few common men understand. For in true Orwellian double-speak, the Freedom that is prescribed “eminently” by the constitution is not what we believe it to be. As I will show further into this essay, freedom actually means tyranny. And ironically, the more tyranny that citizens have forced upon them, the more freedom they enjoy. If you are intrigued and skeptical by this statement, it will all make sense later…
For those brave enough to challenge their own belief system by reading and considering what is written below, I would absolutely invite you to ardently attempt to challenge the following information without patriotic dogma (religious belief). I would invite you to suspend your belief and realize your self; stepping outside of the group-think model you’ve been trained to accept and into the world of individual thought, reason, and unbiased logic. And for God’s sake, literally… search your soul. For if this constitution is truly what you believe it to be, surely you can disprove what I am about to reveal. I wholeheartedly encourage you to attempt to do so.
But first you must read…
Before we can examine the rhetoric of this constitution, we must first understand who the Authors of this “Charter For Freedom” were and why they chose to grammatically pen the constitution as they did. This documented history will be followed (in Part 3) by a step by step examination of each myth and fallacy surrounding the constitution and its verbiage. Now, we will expound upon the actual language and define the words written within this debt compact.
“We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union,
establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense,
promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty
to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this
Constitution for the United States of America.”
To institute or establish; to make an
ordinance; to enact a constitution or law.
To confer on a person the holy orders of priest or deacon.
Ceremony by which a bishop confers on a person
the privileges and powers necessary for the execution
of sacerdotal (priestly) functions in the church.
Civil and ecclesiastical law.
The act of conferring the orders of the church upon an individual*.
***Individual means a single artificial person
In old English law. Those of the religious who deserted their houses,
and, throwing off the habits, renounced their particular
order in contempt of their oath and other obligations.
Ever wondered why certain words are capitalized in the constitution? People, Order, Union, Welfare…?
It would seem that this was just some random quirk by the author in his penmanship, until we take a closer look at those capitalized words.
Let’s take for example this phrase “in Order”, which takes upon itself a very different meaning than the phrase “in order” – where the word order is not capitalized as it is in the Constitution.
Since the constitution was written as: “We the People, in Order to form a more perfect Union… do ordain and establish this Constitution…”, we have grammatically and in meaning a very different legal document than what might otherwise be – one issued and ordained by a specific “Order” of men as a small society of specific “People” with a certain self-granted ecclesiastical status of eminence and domain, who thus signed this Constitution in an Order as the only People. But who or what exactly gave them the eminent power and authority to do this?
***Note: We will be using the “Masonic” edition of the Holy Bible throughout this discourse to help in our comprehensions.
It is stated, according to the Masonic “Holy Bible Red Letter Edition – Masonic Edition Cyclopedic Indexed King James Bible”, published by the John A. Hertzel Co. Chicago (1942), that:
“George Washington the founder of this country was the first Grand Master of Masons’ of this commonwealth compromising the thirteen original States of this Land of Liberty founded on the principles of Brotherly Love, Faith, Hope and Charity, the vital breath of which is “Individual Liberty” and an equal opportunity to all of its citizens. Of the twenty-nine Major Generals in Washington’s army twenty four were Master Masons, of the thirty seven Brigadiers, thirty seven were Master Masons, proving that this “Land of Liberty” was founded by Master Masons. Now as then, masonry’s challenge is the Holy Bible, its teachings from the center to circumference symbols of the everlasting. “The Washington Monument is built of stone contributed by all the nations of the earth to honor the founder of this republic. From Arlington it looks like a giant spike which God had driven, saying ‘Here I stake a claim for the home of Liberty’.” L. J.
Did you notice some of the same grammatical capitalization processes here as were written into the constitution in that City of Brotherly Love?
On the same opening page, it states:
“Of fifty-six signers of the Declaration of Independence, fifty-three were Master Masons.”
So just who was this man, George Washington?
This statue of Washington donning a Masonic Apron
stands in the New york Grand Masonic Hall
Washington’s Masonic Apron is displayed here in a Masonic Lodge,
and is considered “The most prized possession of American Masons”
The Crude Ashlar and the Finished or Perfect Ashlar stones
George Washington laying the Masonic Cornerstone of United States Capital building.
It was Freemason Benjamin Franklin who laid the cornerstone for Independence Hall.
“Of fifty-six signers of the Declaration of Independence, fifty-three were Master Masons.”
From this sourced statement and pictures there should be little doubt in anyone’s mind that the masterminds behind the United States were indeed of the Masonic Order. And as we view the writing style of this Masonic Holy Bible, we can see the same unique capitalization standards as are applied in the language of the constitution.
The question is… What exactly does this capitalized word “Order” mean as it applies to the constitution, and who were the “People” in this “Order”?
The greatest problem in translation is that most people consider these words that were capitalized as merely conversational words. They are not. They are specific legal terms and proper nouns. They are specific concepts and things. And they must be defined as such when comprehending the meaning of this constitution and these purposefully capitalized nouns. In any contract, the subject of that contract is written with capitalization. When this Masonic tool of language is applied, the constitution suddenly takes on a whole new meaning.
Let’s first have a look at just what the definitions of some of these words are as both conversational words compared to their usage as legal and proper nouns.
Definition of ORDER
noun (and proper noun)
Definition of ORDER
All of these words have previously been defined in this essay. The sacramentum or solemn vow, the religious custom of rite, a constitution as a written direction to pay money or be obligated to someone or something…
But first and foremost we must notice the difference in capitalization here for these definitions. For while the verb and noun are not capitalized, the specific noun form of the word Order is proper and therefore necessarily is capitalized. This was no semantic whim on the part of these Masonic architects of the constitution. These words were specifically given as proper Persons, Places, or Things (proper nouns) as opposed to the use of the general or conversational meaning of these words. Even within Webster’s Dictionary, the example used to describe the proper capitalized form of the noun Order is specifically the “Masonic Order” as we see above, which is purposefully capitalized to refer to a specific entity; a group of specific People in a specific Order.
Most importantly, this word specifically signifies a society of men with self-proclaimed eminence and authority as a religious (ecclesiastical) rite as opposed to all common people in general. And when we read this sentence again, it is quite difficult to translate it in any other way.
“We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”
Here is what it would say without the pomp and circumstance of false patriotism to fool the average reader (all the other people):
“We the People of the United States, in Order… do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”
But let’s not be hasty… Are there any other societies of law and order that we may see Masonic proper noun terms used like Liberty, Justice, Union, Tranquility, Blessings, and Welfare, etc?
When a court comes to Order, it is coming to order in the Order of the society of the American Bar Association under the United States’ jurisdiction of the Department of Justice. When a public council meeting comes to order, it is coming to Order with the specific People on that Council under eminent domain of its citizens. And who calls the Court to Order? The Marshal or Sheriff (Bailiff).
But is there something we don’t know about the State Marshal and County Sheriffs?
Crescent and star?
Star of David?
The Seals of Solomon…?
Hey… what’s that ‘G’ in a square and compass doing on that patch?
Hey, why is the international symbol of fascism on that patch?
Fascio (plural fasci)- A bundle of wood wrapped with an axe…
The ancient international symbol of fascism!
Left: National Guard emblem with crossed fasci – Right: seal of U.S. Courts with fascio
Lincoln Memorial with Fasci on throne
George Washington statues with veiled Fasci
Federal Hall, New York City
Left: Seal of the United States Senate with crossed Fasci
Right: U.S. “Mercury” Dime with fascio
The International symbol of Fascism hangs prevalently in the Halls of Congress
And what is that over on the left…?
The God Trust
Speaker of the House James Beauchamp “Champ” Clark standing at the rostrum
in the House of Representatives chamber by Fascio, United States Capitol,
Washington, D.C. (between 1910 and 1915)
But why are these Roman Fasci hanging in the halls of congress and adorning so many monuments?
Well, we can always get the propaganda tour from the governments Office of the Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives:
Did you notice the art was framed in wooden fasci?
Yes… surrounding Washington are the fasci and the Greek gods, what of it slave?
And, from the official U.S. Govt. website of the “Office of the Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives”, we get this official explanation:
The Bronze Fasces
“The bronze fasces, representing a classical Roman symbol of civic authority, are located on both sides of the U.S. flag. The original Roman fasces consisted of an axe within a bundle of rods, bound together by a red strap. The fasces were carried before the consul and were used to restore order and carry out punishment of the courts. The U.S. adopted the fasces as a symbol of the authority of Congress in part due to their symbolic relationship with Republican Rome, which the founding fathers consciously referenced in the formation of the United States.”
“The mace, a decorative variation of the fasces, is placed by the Sergeant at Arms on a pedestal at the Speaker’s right each time the House convenes. The mace is moved to the lower pedestal of the Speaker’s rostrum when the House is called into the Committee of the Whole on the state of the Union or for the consideration of legislation.
This mace has been in use in the House since 1841 when the Members met in the old House Chamber, and was crafted by William Adams, a New York silversmith. The original House mace was destroyed when the British burned the Capitol in 1814. During the intervening years, a wooden mace was used.
To restore order in the Chamber the Speaker may direct the Sergeant at Arms to take the mace from its pedestal and present it before an unruly Member.
The mace is 46 inches high, made of 13 thin ebony rods. The rods are bound together by the four crossing silver bands, which are pinned together and held at the top and bottom of the shaft by silver bands. The bands are decorated with a raised floral border. The inscription “Wm. Adams/Manufacturer/New York/1841” is engraved in a cartouche in the center front of the bottom band.
A silver globe with an eagle perched on it sits at the top of the mace. The globe is 4½ inches in diameter and engraved with the seven continents, the names of the oceans, lines of longitude, and major lines of latitude. The Western Hemisphere faces the front. The globe is encircled with a silver band marked with the degrees of latitude, on which the engraved, solid silver eagle with a 15-inch wingspan rests.”
Now then, where could the symbolic use of the sacred Fasci Mace have come from?
Crest of ZBT = Zeta Beta Tau
– Brotherly (Masonic) Handshake
– (Aladdin’s) Lamp
– Scales of “Justice”
– The Fasci
-Skull and Bones…
– Solomon’s Seal (Star of David)
“Zeta Beta Tau (ZBT) was founded in 1898 as the nation’s first Jewish fraternity.
No longer sectarian, all men of good character who believe in ZBT’s mission
and values are eligible for membership in Zeta Beta Tau. Today the merged
Zeta Beta Tau Brotherhood is one of the largest, numbering over
140,000 initiated Brothers, and over 90 chapter locations.
The Zeta Beta Tau fraternity was inspired by Dr. Richard J. H. Gottheil,
a professor of languages at Columbia University and a Zionist.
On December 29, 1898, he formed a Zionist youth society with
a group of students from several New York City universities.
Rush week… Join ZBT now!
For the Masonic Knights Templar, the skull and bones symbolize Golgotha –
the place of Jesus’ crucifixion. It is also used to symbolize a dire warning
against betraying the group’s secrets and/or failing to keep one’s oath.
So where else can we find this fascist Roman symbol of authority and the “right” (rite) to punish “sin” and “evil” in the United States’ spiritual jurisdiction?
Look a bit closer…
The dome upon the United States Capital building in
Washington D.C. is adorned with multiple symbols of fascism
Jefferson County Courthouse (1929), downtown Birmingham, Alabama.
Chicago City Hall with Fascio over doorway
Boston Federal Building
The first General Assembly of the State of Colorado approved the adoption of the state seal on March 15, 1877. The Colorado Secretary of State alone is authorized to affix the Great Seal of Colorado to any document whatsoever. By statute, the seal of the State is two and one-half inches in diameter with the following devices inscribed thereon: At the top is the Eye of Providence or ‘All Seeing Eye’ within a triangle, from which golden rays radiate on two sides. Below the eye is a scroll, the Roman fasces, a bundle of birch or elm rods with a battle ax bound together by red thongs and bearing on a band of red, white and blue, the word, “Union and Constitution.”… Below the shield in a semicircle is the motto, “Nil Sine Numine”, Latin words meaning “nothing without the Deity”, and at the bottom the figures 1876, the year Colorado came into statehood.
Cleveland Public Library
U.S. Army and Air Force National Guard emblem with crossed Fasci
42nd MP Brigade (Military Police) patch
US Army Military Police Corps Regimental Insignia
United States Army Institute of Heraldry
Approved July 3rd, 1986
Emblem of the Masonic Knights Of Columbus
New York Deputy Inspector badge with crossed Fasci on Shield
CCTV fittingly perched over a fascio
An early Roman coin with Caesar’s head and symbols
representing things the coin could be spent upon…
1. ears of corn (food and lodging)
2. Fasce (payments of Roman tax levies) and
3. Caduceus – (payment for medical treatments)
In Roman occupied countries such as Judea in 33 A.D.,
Roman capital punishment execution squads were always
preceded by two official “Lictors” bearing the two “Fasces”.
Alexander Garden fence, Moscow Kremlin
National emblem of France
France Civic Heraldry
Liberty, Equality, Fraternity (Brotherhood)
A modern French Passport with Fascio
A Tour Of Italy
Great Coat Of Arms of Italy during Fascist era from1929 to 1943.
This was displayed during the rule of the National Fascist Party.
Flag of the Repubblica Sociale Italiana,
during Mussolini’s reign.
Mussolini’s personal flag
dell’Arco della Vittoria di Bolzano
Liceo Scientifico a Bergamo (College)
Italian Military Uniform Fasci pins
Fasci in front of obelisk
Acquedotto consorziale, Marano Principato Cs.
Palazo Ducezio, Sicilia
Note the Lions head – representing the Tribe of Judah
Left: una Statua dello Stadio dei Marmi
sui Mosaici del Foro Italico
Chamber of Fasci and Corporations (Italian: Camera dei Fasci e delle Corporazioni) was the official name of the Italian Chamber of Deputies established on January 19, 1939, to replace the Chamber of Deputies during the 30th legislature of Italy. The Chamber was vested with legislative power from March 23, 1939 to August 2, 1943, during the height of the regime of Benito Mussolini’s National Fascist Party. Members of the chamber were called ‘”national councilors” (consiglieri nazionali) rather than deputies. The councilors of the chamber did not represent geographical constituencies, but the different branches of the trade and industry of Italy, thus reflecting the corporativist idea of fascist ideology.
Councilors were elected for terms of undetermined length and automatically lost their seats upon their defection from the branch they did represent. Renewal of the legislature was ordered by decree by the King of Italy, on specific instruction of the head of government (Mussolini).
No elections took place in Italy between 1934 and 1946. The new founded Chamber of the Fascists and the Corporations replaced the Chamber of Deputies of Italy during the spring of 1939, with the legislative body coming into effect on March 23, 1939, as the 30th legislature of the Kingdom of Italy. Unlike earlier elections for the legislature held under the Fascist era, popular suffrage was not put into effect. Instead, candidates were simply delivered under the pretext of a parliamentary reform, replacing the elections system with a body comprising only candidates of the various corporations of Italy, fulfilling Benito Mussolini’s vow of enacting a complete corporativist system.
If one reads this with awareness, one quickly realizes that the United States is a corporativist nation. Though different in structure, no one can doubt that corporations are the power structure and lobbying force behind our representatives. The big picture reveals that the U.S. government is a major investor/stock owner of all major corporations around the world, making this true ideal and requirement of fascism (government owning corporations) a transparent reality.
How many politicians go on to be board of directors and CEO’s of the very corporations they once regulated in government?
Palazzo Montecitorio, seat of the Chamber of Fasci and Corporations.
Today this is the office of the Chamber of Deputies of Italy
The symbols of fascism obviously remain…
Ecuador state flag with fasci
Coat of arms of the Swiss canton of St. Gallen since 1803
Norwegian Police Badge with double Fasci
Switzerland’s Military Flag circa 1800
Willam Tell near Fasce
Emblem of Spanish Civil Guard
Fasce, Sword, and Crown
Grand Coat of arms of Vilnius, Lithuania
Fasce and the scales of Justice
Original Flag of the British Union of Fascists
Ancient Roman Fasci
In ancient Rome, the bodyguards of a magistrate carried fasci.
According to Legion XXIV website:
The FASCES was a cylindrical bundle of elm or birch rods bound together by red bands, from which an ax head projected; and which was borne by Lictors (attendants and body guards) before a Consul or high Magistrate, as a symbol of their authority.
Stephen Phenow, Editor of the Strategikon, provides the following: “The Fasces was adopted from the Etruscans. It symbolized the power of life or death that a Roman Magistrate had over the Roman citizen; who could be scourged by the birch rods, representing physical punishment for transgressions; or be beheaded by the axe for serious crimes.”
The lowering of the Fasces was a form of salute to a higher official. It was also an emblem of unity and power; being used as an icon on coins and “coats of arms” long after the times of Ancient Rome. The number of Lictores in the Republic varied by magistrial rank. A Dictator was honored with 24 lictores, each carrying a Fasces; a Consul was awarded 12, while a Praetor was allowed 6. Stepen Phenow also adds: “The Imperator (Emperor) usually was a Consul as well, so he would maintain 12 licores carrying fasces. Emperor Claudius had this number proceed him before entering a captured town in Britannia.” After the reign of Emperor Domitian (81-96AD), the Imperator was accorded 24 lictores. Benito Mussolini’s Italian “Fascist”Party of the 1930’s, derived its name from the Fasces, which it had adopted as an emblem in 1919.
The reconstruction shown here was assembled by the Commander in February 2002. The body is 42 inches (1012mm) long with a 4.5 inch (115mm) stem extending from the bottom. It weighs 14 pounds and is composed of Thirty-One 3/4 inch (20mm) wood dowels and has a diameter of 5 inches (128mm). The axe head is 6 inches (152mm), from point to point, and extends 3 inches (76mm) from the bundle. Some 36 feet (11 meters) of 3/4 inch burgandy leather strapping was used to bind the bundle. In some Fasces, the axe head was placed in the center of the length of the body. There are also some representations of the Fasces showing two axe heads, one per side, extending from the opposite sides of the rod bundle.
The word fasces means “bundle” and refers to the fact that it is a bundle of rods, which surrounded an ax in the middle. In ancient Rome, the lictors carried fasces before consul, praetors and dictators, i.e., magistrates that held imperium (which means that they had the right to command and interpret the flight of the birds). Other people escorted by lictors with fasces were Vestal Virgins, governors, and the commanders of legions.
During the empire, the fasces of the emperor were distinguished from those of the magistrates by laurels. This was a republican custom, however: on festive occasions (e.g., a military victory), fasces could be crowned with laurel. On the other hand, when the city was in mourning, the fasces were sometimes cloaked. If the ax was left out, it could mean that the magistrate wanted to request something from the people or had something to apologize for.
The fasces were a symbol of authority, but the precise meaning is unknown. It is often claimed that the rods could be used to lash people, and the ax to execute them. This may have been true in the days of the monarchy, but not during the republic. After the Laws of the twelve tables, no Roman magistrate could summarily execute a Roman citizen.
The Romans believed that the fasces were introduced in Rome from Etruria. Again, this may be true, but the tradition is open to some criticism. So far, only one set of fasces has been found in Etruria, in the Tomba del littore near Vetulonia, in 1890. This find has been hailed as a confirmation of the tradition, but it should be noted that the archaeologists only found a lot of small rusty flakes, which were interpreted as Etruscan fasces, which, they had to admit, were not identical to Roman fasces. They were entirely made of metal, the ax had two blades, and finally: the Etruscan fasces were extremely small. It has been said that the find from Vetulonia is only a miniature model, but this is poor method: to rescue an interpretation, one introduces a hypothesis.
So this international symbol of fascism permeates all three branches of government and hangs openly and without fear in the very Halls of Congress that pump out tyranny and oppression on a daily basis.
But our original question was about the force of law; Sheriffs, police, Marshals, and military men…
Is it possible that these men are of a Fraternal Brotherhood unknown to most of their citizen victims?
Her Majesty’s Fascist Police
The National Transportation Safety Board
Customs And Border Protection
“Maine Masonry has many notable men in its ranks; men who have accomplished great things in the eyes of a grateful society by performing acts that are just a part of doing their jobs. Our Grand Secretary R.W. Brother Hollis G. Dixon is one of them. He is a Mason who values the act of contributing to his community but would rather not stand in the spotlight for it. He is modest by nature and true to his core beliefs of good citizenship, service, and integrity. Please join us in congratulating Hollis for being named Legendary Trooper of the Maine State Police. Hollis was awarded the honor in a ceremony last week in Augusta and presented with a plaque in recognition of that honor.
“Pictured in the photo from left to right are: Maine State Police Lt. Ralph Pinkham, Retired, who presented the award to Hollis; Maine State Police Captain Hollis “Tom” Dixon, Retired; Gov. John Baldacci; Maine Commissioner of Public Safety Ann Jordan; and Maine State Police Col. Patrick Fleming. Also in attendance but not pictured were other Troopers who are Masons. Captain Guy Savage, Maine State Police, Retired, who was Tom’s first Sgt. when he joined the State Police and Guy’s son, Cpl. Breen Savage, Retired, who Tom helped train when Breen joined the State Police. (Breen supplied the picture). Also Lt. Gerald “Red” Therrien, Retired, who is active in the Shrine and who Tom raised when he was Master of the Maine State Police Masonic Degree Team.”
“Friendship, Morality, and Brotherly Love”
Now pay your fine or go to jail!!!
How about in Canada?
And for these Masonic Officers in their Morality and Brotherly Love
to exact (extort) from the people they police and serve,
the judges who decide on the ethics of their actions would
have to be an organized Fraternity of Brotherly Love as well…
Lampasas County Courthouse, Texas
Anderson County Courthouse, Texas
Travis County Courthouse, Texas
Laying the Masonic Cornerstone
“BERKELEY SPRINGS – A ceremony steeped in nearly 300 years of tradition helped mark the placement of the cornerstone for the new Morgan County Courthouse Saturday.
Freemasons from the West Virginia Grand Lodge in Charleston along with members of Deford Lodge No. 88 in Berkeley Springs held a cornerstone ceremony, which is meant to celebrate the construction of the new building and to remind everyone that all things must be built on a strong foundation.
‘It’s just a public awareness to keep the public involved and a celebration of the community,’ said Charlie Montgomery, a member of Deford Lodge. ‘They are able to come together in a time of sharing and fellowship.'”
Old Lincoln County Courthouse, New Mexico
Old Cameron County Courthouse, Brownsville Texas
Grand Master Hugh Layne (Left) and Judge Pace
seal Courthouse Cornerstone containing ‘Time Capsule’,
Spartanburg County Detention Facility, SC
Local Missouri Freemason lodge conducting a
brief Masonic cornerstone dedication in Kahoka, Montana
for the new courthouse
“You must conceal all the crimes of your brother Masons, except murder and treason, and these only at your own option, and should you be summoned as a witness against a brother Mason be always sure to shield him. Prevaricate [falsify], don’t tell the whole truth in his case, keep his secrets, forget the most important points… It may be perjury to do this, it is true, but you’re keeping your obligations, and remember if you live up to your obligation strictly, you’ll be free from sin.”
–Edmond Ronayne, “Masonic Handbook,” (page 183)
What a frightening realization that the upper levels of the justice system is an Order – a Masonic Rite – a Fraternal Brotherhood ordained to enforce and protect the will of the United States, which was created by the same secret society of Masonry in Order to create, impose, protect, and enforce its will upon all people… of which it calls code. If America is under the control of the Masonic Order that controls the United States, and if America was indeed the “New World” as history records, then America is already under the control of the New World Order.
Why does the DMV offer Masonic license plates as a non-profit venture?
Masonic protection from Masonic police…
At the Philadelphia Masonic Hall…
With an honor guard of troopers standing at ease,
Anthony J. Garvey (center), Chief of Staff of the Grand Lodge,
flanked by Lt. Col. George P. March, P.M. (left), and
Lt. Col. Thomas K. Coury (right), both Deputy Commissioners
of the Pennsylvania State Police, await the arrival of
Col. Paul J. Evanko, Commissioner.
Grand Master Ernette (center) is joined (at left) by
Deputy Commissioners Lt. Col. Coury and Lt. Col. March
to congratulate (at right) Col. Evanko and Lt. Col. Westcott.
“On Aug. 22, in the presence of the Right Worshipful Grand Master James L. Ernette, three distinguished members of the Pennsylvania State Police were made Masons-at-Sight in the Masonic Temple, Philadelphia. They are: Colonel Paul J. Evanko, Commissioner of the Pennsylvania State Police; Lieutenant Colonel Joseph H. Westcott, Deputy Commissioner; and Trooper Roberto Soto.
Corinthian Hall was filled to capacity, including more than a hundred brethren who are troopers and municipal law enforcement officers.
The brethren who served as the conferring Worshipful Masters were: Entered Apprentice Mason’s Degree, Trooper Edward J. Lizewski; Fellowcraft Mason’s Degree, Trooper Charles J. McBreen; and Master Mason’s Degree, Lt. Col. George P. March, P.M.
The brethren of the Pennsylvania State Police Masonic Degree Team who participated in conferring the three degrees are pictured above with the R.W. Grand Lodge Officers and the new Masons. They are (listed alphabetically): James J. Carey; Thomas K. Coury; Walter C. Ditzler, P.M.; Gerald Eaton, J.D.; David W. Escalet; Patrick Foy, J.W.; Bruce Gaton; Stephen S. Heitz; George F. Himmelright, Jr.; Edward M. Kauffman, S.W.; Edward J. Lizewski, J.W.; George P. March, P.M.; Douglas Martin; Charles J. McBreen, J.D.; Charles L. McBreen, P.M.; Carl E. Mease; Kevin M. Organtini; John G. Richards; Phillip Rickert, J.W.; Robert Robbins, W.M.; James J. Schultz; Vaughn Schwalm; Louis M. Vittor, P.M.; and Serell I. Ulrich.
(Source: PA Grand Lodge website: http://www.pagrandlodge.org/freemason/1198/mas.html)
Suit: Group membership aided trooper
Fri, Jul. 25, 2003
By Chris Gray, Inquirer Staff Writer
George Washington belonged to the fraternity of Free and Accepted Masons. So did Benjamin Franklin, Charles Lindbergh, Clark Gable and Arnold Palmer.
So do numerous Pennsylvania state troopers, including many current and former high-ranking officers. And now allegations have been raised that law enforcement members of the charitable and social fraternity protected former trooper Michael Evans, a Mason since 1989, when he was faced with sexual-misconduct complaints that in some cases led to convictions.
The allegations are contained in the same federal lawsuit that included previously confidential reports of sexual misconduct within the State Police that recently have made headlines.
How many times have we seen police officers bypass the law in their abuse, rape, and murder of citizens?
How many cases are dismissed by judges of that Order?
“Today, we assemble as Freemasons to celebrate our heritage.
We do so by honoring the memory of a Brother who took advantage
of a most unique opportunity to play an active role in the development
of our state, and in the development of our Grand Lodge.
The Brother is our former Governor George Wesley Atkinson…
Atkinson helped to lay a proper foundation so that Ancient Craft Masonry
could assume a prominent role as a leading institution, even to this day,
just as our state has assumed its rightful place of honor among
the United States of America.”
“In the hallways of the grand lodge headquarters, the walls are crowded
with framed photographs of Masons past and present, but mostly past:
Hubert H. Humphrey, the former vice president; and William J. Bratton,
the former police commissioner who is now the chief of police in Los Angeles…”
“New York’s Masons are heavily involved in community service,
underwriting medical research and supplying 29,000 American flags,
one for every public school classroom in the city.
But still there are the secret rooms where Masons gather.”
—2006 New York times Article, ‘A Secret Society, Spilling a Few Secrets’
A Royal Pain In The…
“Two detective chief inspectors among 944 officers in England and Wales
with a criminal record. One officer found guilty of gross misconduct after
sending racist and sexist texts is still in his job. Hundreds of others facing
misconduct allegations are allowed to escape punishment by quitting their forces.”
POLICE MASONS LIST WILL REMAIN SECRET
Sunday Telegraph SUNDAY 16 Apr 2000
By Joe Murphy, Political Editor
“The Home Office is to block public access to a register of Freemasons within the police service for fear of damaging confidence in the forces.
It marks a realization among ministers that Labour’s early plans to end the Masonic culture in the judicial system is in danger of backfiring by undermining officers who are innocent of any impropriety. Ministers will announce fresh plans for the register of Freemasons, which is currently voluntary, next month. They have yet to decide over calls from a Labour-dominated Commons committee for it to be strengthened by being made compulsory for police to declare their membership of the secretive society but will undertake that those who do so will not be exposed to public scrutiny.
Labour MPs have long campaigned for Freemasonry to be banned in the judicial system, believing that it fosters corruption by encouraging police and judges to feel they are under an obligation to fellow lodge members. Freemasons, however, insist that the society is merely a charitable and social institution, despite its code of secrecy and rituals.
A Home Office official said: “We are not backing away from the need to establish just how widespread Masonic activity is within the forces but it is a question of how to do it. It will not help if police are deterred from being open about their membership because they think it would be raised in trials or disciplinary hearings. There is a case for public access to the register as a gesture of open government but this is outweighed by the risk that defence lawyers might exploit an officer’s membership to suggest he or she is corrupt.”
Earlier this month, Britain’s most senior Masonic judge attacked the Government’s investigations into Freemasonry. Lord Millett, a sitting law lord, accused a parliamentary inquiry of having “absolutely no basis” and being “oppressive”. He said it had led to defendants demanding to know whether judges hearing their cases and police officers giving evidence against them were Masons.
About 20 per cent of judges have refused to reply to a questionnaire issued by Lord Irvine, the Lord Chancellor, asking if they are Freemasons. The voluntary register for police has fared even worse, with only 38,875 of the 126,000 officers in England and Wales responding, of whom just 417 admitted to being Freemasons. There are an estimated 8,000 Masonic lodges in Britain.”
The Masons Stole My House
By Simon Regan
Scallywag Magazine Issue 25
A tale against corruption in Greenwich involving a solicitor
An astonishing tale of one woman’s battle against corruption in Greenwich council involving a struck-off solicitor convicted for fraud points directly to a conspiracy amongst prominent freemasons to wrongfully repossess council properties and throw the rightful owners onto the streets…
They soon found out, by acquiring a copy of the Lincolnshire Freemason’s handbook, that all the solicitors they had used (and as time went by they used most firms in Lincolnshire) were listed as Masons. More important they were able to expose Leslie Oldman architect of the whole devious scheme. With a mixture of delight and consternation they proved he had been struck off as a solicitor ten years before for sustained forgery and misuse of his client funds – a heinous crime for any solicitor. Yet he was still signing his name as “Assistant Borough Solicitor”. They brought this to the attention of just about everyone, but Oldman is still employed by the council.
Mrs. Riley is now convinced that a regular racket has been taking place in Greenwich for a number of years. It goes like this: A family buys its council house, but solicitors acting for them fail to pay a paltry sum and Oldman is able to step in and repossess. The house is then sold for a song and the partners collect the difference. This time, however, they hadn’t realised Mrs. Riley’ tenacity…
UNITED KINGDOM: The Freemasons and Police
Have the British police fallen under the sway of Freemasons? The boss of Scotland Yard and officials at the Home Office say they are worried about the Freemasons’ influence over senior police officers. Several cases of corruption are said to have been covered up at the bidding of the brotherhood.
At least one in seven male magistrates in the U.K. are members of the Freemason brotherhood, according to a first official survey of the judiciary’s links with the secret organization…
UNITED KINGDOM: FREEMASONS BEND TO PRESSURE
Police officers and local government officials figure largely among the 50 British Freemasons who have resigned from their lodges on claims their careers would be damaged if they were publicly identified as members of “the Craft,”…
UNITED KINGDOM: THE PARLIAMENT WANTS NAMES OF FREEMASONS
Senior officials of the ruling council of British Freemasonry, the United Grand Lodge of England (UGL) , face charges of contempt of parliament if they fail to provide the Commons Select Committee on Home Affairs with the names of 163 members connected with police corruption and miscarriages of justice…
UNITED KINGDOM: FINGER-POINTING AT FREEMASONS
Gavin Purser, president of the United Grand Lodge of England’s Board of General Purposes, has reluctantly given the names of 16 Freemasons linked to a number of controversial police investigations in the 1970s and 1980s to Chris Mullin, chairman of the Commons Home Affairs Committee…
UNITED KINGDOM: FREDERICK CRAWFORD
Prime minister John Major has personally appointed a Freemason, Frederick Crawford, to the £80,000-per-year, part-time post as chairman of the new Criminal Cases Review Authority (CCRA)…
UNITED KINGDOM: NEW WARNING ON MASON LINKS
The Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) has drawn up national guidelines warning police officers that membership of the Freemasons (or other secretive and influential societies) could “compromise their integrity as impartial upholders of the law.
UNITED KINGDOM: POLICE SUPPORT FREEMASON SECRECY
Following the first-ever debate of its kind, the Police Federation rejected a motion by 429 votes to 391 to compel all officers belonging to the Freemason Brotherhood or other secret societies to declare their membership publicly…
When a government ceases to protect its people and instead that government protects itself from its people, and when the servants of the public become their masters through contract and forced debt slavery, then government is not of the people or for the people. It is then the enemy of the people.
The Legal Perversion
Of Liberty And Freedom
So what other proper nouns did these Masons go out of their way to capitalize in specification when designing this corporate charter called the Constitution?
Let’s take a look at the word “Liberty”.
We can see that this noun is capitalized as well, signifying that it represents a specific (proper) type of liberty. As with all of the words included within this constitution, each one carries with it a duel meaning. One is conversational and general to the English language, and denotes the natural state of things. The other is specific to legal and corporate things, and thus is capitalized to ensure that the distinction is clear. The constitution refers to the only type of liberty that a corporation can control, which is political liberty.
Look at the difference between natural liberty and political Liberty as defined by Webster’s:
Definition of LIBERTY
The difference between these two meanings of the same word is paramount in importance. In fact, even this definition is an oxymoron. For how can one be free if limits are placed upon that free movement?
The answer is actually a simple one. For the constitution only refers to a specific type of liberty, which is “political Liberty”. In fact, it would be pointless for the constitution to refer to natural liberty as this natural right exists despite the constitution. The constitution did not create nature or God. Only through contract, Trust, and power of attorney can natural rights be squelched by political rights.
While the general term of “liberty” denotes a basic natural form of being free both in life and from tyranny, the opposite is true of the word used in the constitution. The Masonic use of the proper noun “Liberty” denotes a very specific (proper) political use of the word, and thus it becomes as Webster’s describes above a revokable privilege instead of a natural, God-given right.
Perhaps this is easier to understand if we compare it to any other contract you have ever entered into, where you have agreed to follow a certain set of rules as contractually (constitutionally) laid out by the other party or corporation, such as in a gym or club membership. This agreement gives you the political “Liberty” to do only what is allowed by that person or corporation, and takes away any other “liberty” you might have. For instance, a no smoking rule may be enforced. So as a citizen of the United States, you have only political Liberties with no natural liberty. Any natural liberty you might have has simply not been restricted and licensed yet – it has not been made legal or illegal. In other words, if you break any of the increasingly lawless laws of this government (and there are now too many to count or comprehend), you have just broken your contract. In the spiritual jurisdiction of the United States, a citizen only has political “Liberty” (granted privileges) and no other form of “liberty”. For government cannot control your natural rights and liberty to express them without your tacit agreement to be a member of the United States corporation and give up your natural rights for its political rights. Thus, “Liberty” is political, which means that your liberty is a privilege, not a right. The constitution can only grant (create) political rights, not natural ones. Again, understanding the importance in the concept that God and only God can give natural rights is the shield and saber against government political oppression. This does not require actual belief in any tangible or ritualistic “god” or “God”, only the realization that you were born with your rights in nature, without government or a constitution, and that you are the only one who can give those away in exchange for man’s law over nature (God) and yourself.
Citizenship = membership.
Membership = political rights (benefits).
Just as an employee of Walmart must submit to the political Liberty of the Walmart corporation or be punished as an “employee”, so to must an employee (citizen) of the United States submit to the political Liberty of the United States or be punished.
It is perhaps more wise to use the Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856 definition here as this dictionary is quite reflective of the times in which the constitution was created, and was adopted into the law of the United States as the official dictionary.
LIBERTY. Freedom from restraint. The power of acting as one thinks fit, without any restraint or control, except from the laws of nature.
2. Liberty is divided into civil, natural, personal, and political.
3. Civil liberty is the power to do whatever is permitted by the constitution of the state and the laws of the land. It is no other than natural liberty, so far restrained by human laws, and no further, operating equally upon all the citizens, as is necessary and expedient for the general advantage of the public.
(Note: the “public” is government, thus the “public good” is what is good for government)
4. That system of laws is alone calculated to maintain civil liberty, which leaves the citizen entirely master of his own conduct, except in those points in which the public good requires some direction and restraint. When a man is restrained in his natural liberty by no municipal laws but those which are requisite to prevent his violating the natural law, and to promote the greatest moral and physical welfare of the community, he is legally possessed of the fullest enjoyment of his civil rights of individual liberty. But it must not be inferred that individuals are to judge for themselves how far the law may justifiably restrict their individual liberty; for it is necessary to-the welfare of the commonwealth, that the law should be obeyed; and thence is derived the legal maxim, that no man may be wiser than the (man’s) law.
5. Natural liberty is the right which nature gives to all mankind, of diposing of their persons and property after the manner they judge most consonant to their happiness, on condition of their acting within the limits of the law of nature, and that they do not in any way abuse it to the prejudice of other men.
6. Personal liberty is the independence of our actions of all other will than our own. It consists in the power of locomotion, of changing situation, or removing one’s person to whatever place one’s inclination may direct, without imprisonment or restraint, unless by due course of law.
(Note: Don’t get pulled in to “personal liberty”, for it is political and has exceptions, where a judge can “decide” through “due course of man’s law” to take it away. Never turn from God and nature – for a natural right is above all other forms.)
7. Political liberty may be defined to be, the security by which, from the constitution, form and nature of the established government, the citizens enjoy civil liberty. No ideas or definitions are more distinguishable than those of civil and political liberty, yet they are generally confounded. The political liberty of a state is based upon those fundamental laws which establish the distribution of legislative and executive powers. The political liberty of a citizen is that tranquillity of mind, which is the effect of an opinion that he is in perfect security; and to insure this security, the government must be such that one citizen shall not fear another.
8. In the English law, by liberty is meant a privilege held by grant or prescription, by which some men enjoy greater benefits than ordinary subjects. A liberty is also a territory, with some extraordinary privilege.
9. By liberty or liberties, is understood a part of a town or city, as the Northern Liberties of the city of Philadelphia…
The difference between natural and political liberty is the difference between having a government and not having a govern-ment (being controlled). A government that protects natural rights would be one that is just. It would protect natural law and defend against all other forms except valid contract law (lawful agreements between two or more people). But the United States government goes out of its way to suppress natural rights and liberties in order to replace them with political or “civil” rights and liberties. In other words, the United States seeks to destroy any connection of its citizens to the natural law (to God). And this is when a government is considered no longer just and moral. This is when government is fascist. And when we pledge our allegiance to its flag, we have no idea that “Liberty and Justice for All” is the socialist/fascist kind of political liberty and justice for all citizens, not all men.
How about the word “Welfare” as used in the Masonic Constitution?
Look at the absolute opposite difference in definitions presented here by Webster’s:
Definition of WELFARE
1 : the state of doing well especially in respect to good fortune, happiness, well-being, or prosperity <must look out for your own welfare>
2a : aid in the form of money or necessities for those in need
2b : an agency or program through which such aid is distributed
Again, we see here the very opposite meanings of this dualistic word Welfare as a proper noun.
Consider for a moment the actual government Welfare System and Agency in the United States. Social Security was created in Title 42 of United States Code (US CODE).
Can you guess what this chapter of US CODE is called?
U.S.C. TITLE 42: THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE
Some refer to the Social Security system as unconstitutional, and yet here in the constitution is the very reference that makes it and the enforcement system around it indeed constitutional. For the only form of welfare that the United States corporation can give you is the type that you contract to receive – political Welfare as a monetary instrument (Security). Your own personal or natural welfare is your natural right and responsibility. Government can only provide political Welfare to citizens under contract. And that privilege provided by government, as we see in modern times, can in fact be detrimental to your natural welfare and health. The problem is that by default, a citizen agrees to give up his or her natural welfare in exchange for the government privilege of political Welfare.
For any political right taken by men from government will replace his or her natural right. Any political liberty taken will replace natural liberty. And any political freedom taken from government will make every man naturally less free.
Oh, did you believe that the constitution gave you freedom?
Well, you were right, for it gives you nothing but political freedom.
FREEDOM, Liberty; the right to do what is not forbidden by law. Freedom does not preclude the idea of subjection to law; indeed, it presupposes the existence of some legislative (man’s law) provision, the observance of which insures freedom to us, by securing (forcing) the like observance from others. –Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856
Defending Freedom… or forcing and enforcing it?
Freedom = To obey the Law of the Law Society
I always believed that freedom was a choice. But indeed, the only freedom a citizen of the United States can enjoy is the revokable privilege of a political right – which means that he must obey the law no matter how opposed it is to natural law. Freedom is a political privilege, not a natural right. And it can be taken away at any time. For free men give up that natural right to accept political entitlement and benefit – trading the natural state of being free for the political right to obey the law (freedom). So we must always remember that freedom is a government granted privilege, and it specifically means that you must obey the law of government. This is the difference between natural and political freedom. For political freedom only means to obey the law – even when the law is lawless and is specifically designed to take away all of your natural rights. For political freedom squashes your natural right to be free. And this is the only Freedom that is protected by the constitution – the kind that takes away your state of being free and responsible for your own actions.
As Webster’s has so eloquently differentiated above, when the constitution proclaims that it shall “promote the general Welfare“, it was specifically laying the legal groundwork for everything that is within Title 42, including Social Security and Medicare, which are massive investment pension funds of government that funnel billions each year in taxation, and which government requires citizens to contribute to. When tax is no longer a choice and when tax debtors are imprisoned, government has shown itself as a tyrant.
Of course, it seems that no one has considered that this little word in the constitution that has inspired such a dramatic and tyrannical “Welfare Program” in the United States is also the very thing that makes Obama-care (the new socialist government health care insurance plan) a valid corporate endeavor of this corporate United States, forcing political Welfare upon the citizens of the United States. After all, the vast majority of this Obama-Care Act was placed into US CODE – TITLE 42: THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE!
So Obama-Care is certainly constitutional!!!
But then, anymore, what isn’t?
Read more on Obama-Care and the true nature of the Courts and this nation, here: realitybloger.wordpress.com/2012/07/04/why-the-supreme-court-claims-obamacare-is-constitutional/
We must also examine the first phrase in the constitution, which is “We, the People…”.
I’m sure by this point I shouldn’t need to try and convince you that the capitalized version of a word is very different than the un-capitalized version of the same word. The word “People” is no exception. Can you guess why this word was capitalized?
The word “We” signifies the signers of the constitution who make the claim to be the “People” of the United States.
It may be easiest to understand what this means by simple interchanging the word “People” with the word “undersigned”. For the Signers were “the People”.
We, the undersigned, in Order…
If this phrase had meant in general terms all the people in the 13 colonies, there would be no reason to be proper with this noun. And if this was the case, for this to have been a lawfully binding contract on all of those people, every last man, woman, and child would have had to sign this constitution.
But as a proper noun, this word “People” refers solely to the men signing this constitution, with added emphasis in the word “We”.
The constitution in fact cannot refer to any man other than those who signed that document, just as a contract from Walmart would have no effect on anyone but the specific People who sign that document. If Walmart sent you a letter tomorrow stating that you must accept Walmart Healthcare you would laugh incredulously and throw the letter where it belongs – in the trash. Yet as a member of the corporation of the United States who receives the benefits of that citizenship, you are required by your United States employer to take its Health and Welfare called Obama-Care.
In other words, it is your political right to have Obama-Care forced upon you, because you gave up your natural right to not have it forced upon you through your contractual nature with the United States as its citizen.
Webster’s makes this distinction nicely…
Definition of PEOPLE
(Natural people vs specific Political People)
To make free to incorporate a man in a society or body politic.
–Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856
Here again we see the distinction between people as human beings (all people in the country) and the People (the special class) who signed the constitution. As an Order of Masons, the People in the constitution are the men who signed it.
The word “we” is defined as –
“I and the rest of a group that includes me : you and I : you and I and another or others : I and another or others not including you —used as pronoun of the first person plural”
In any contract, the only people affected by said contract are the signers of that contract, and this requires free will, acquiescence, consent, and a meeting of the minds before the signature is applied. But there is no mind behind the constitution, for it is artificial, and no meeting of minds can be had. Acceptance of that document as if it were a contract is a unilateral submission to the Federal Government. And while your acceptance forces you to accept terms and laws, government is not bound by and can change that constitution at any time. You, the individual, can not.
No man has the power to contract other men without their consent. Thus, we can also see the clear distinction made in this first sentence:
“We the People of the United States, in Order… do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”
The People of the United States are quite different from the people of the 50 states united in America. The United States, according to the constitution, is a 10 mile square tract of land called a corporate municipal “District”, which is not in America. Whereas the United States of America is the entirety of the 50 States and all people within those 50 countries, the United States is a specific corporation. The United States of America were the 13 colonies. The United States is specifically and distinctly different and outside of the 50 specific states united in America. The People of the United States were not the people of America – the “lower animals” naturally born in their countries.
And as we have now discovered, this Order of Masons was indeed the People of the constitution.
But these People had something else in common… their blood!
For they were in fact the People as defined above as “the members of a family or kinship“.
The Blood Oath…
More Than Meets The Eye
George Washington has quite the royal bloodline. He is 2nd cousin, 9 times removed from current Prince William of England – who is the 27th great grandson of Charlemagne.
Thomas Jefferson is the 6th cousin, 5 times removed of the current Queen Elizabeth II.
It turns out that all past presidents of the United States corporation are cousins of this royal line.
Barack Husein Obama, the current president, has this as his lineage:
William The Conquerer – 22nd Great Grandson
Anne Boleyn, Queen of England – 1st cousin, 15 time removed
Henry V, King of England – 1st cousin, 19 times removed
Henry VIII, King of England – 1st cousin 16 times removed
Mary I, Queen of Scott’s, 3rd cousin, 14 times removed
James Madison, U.S. President, 3rd cousin, 8 times removed
Harry Truman and Abe Lincoln, U.S. Presidents – 7th cousins
Jimmy Carter, U.S. President – 8th Cousin
Dick Cheney, U.S. vice-President for Bush Jr. – 8th cousin
Gerald Ford, u.S. President – 9th cousin
Thomas Jefferson, U.S. President, 10th cousin, 6 times removed
Sarah Palin, Governor and Obama’s competition – 10th cousin
George Bush Sr/Jr, as are all presidents, are both of this royal line. Bush Jr. is related to:
Vlad The Impaler (A.K.A. Dracula) – 32nd Great Grandson
Diana, Princess of Wales – 11th cousin, 2 times removed
Millard Fillmore and James Garfield, U.S. Presidents – 4th cousins
Franklin Peirce, U.S. President – 5th cousin
Gerald Ford, William Taft, Calvin Coolridge, U.S. Presidents – 6th cousins
Theodore Roosevelt, Abe Lincoln, U.S. Presidents – 7th cousins
Richard Nixon, U.S. President – 9th cousins
Dick Cheny, Bush’s vice-President – 9th cousin, 1 time removed
John Kerry, Senator and Obama Cabinet, and Bush’s competition – 9th cousin, 2 times removed
Barrack Obama, current U.S. President – 11th cousin
Sarah Palin, Governor and Obama’s competition – 11th cousin
And of course in true incestuous fashion, George W. Bush is 9th cousins with Barbara Peirce, his own mother!
**Note: John Kerry is also the 34th Great Grandson of Vlad The Impaler.
**Note: These are very incomplete lists.
Here is a picture of Former President Franklin Peirce, who’s granddaughter Barbara Peirce married George H. W. Bush and bore the president named George W Bush. Next to that is a current picture of Mitt Romney. The resemblance of the bloodline is uncanny.
So who were the signers of the constitution of the United States that were also this Order of People?
Nothing more than cousins and offspring of the kings and queens of England – Master Masons with intentions other than the free state of all people (animals) and with the intent to establish a charter for the incorporation of power in the “New World” for their own bloodline “People”, with all other people subject to that power.
George W. Bush, Deist Master Mason Extraordinaire
Jerusalem Post, 1994
With guest speaker, President and Mason Bill Clinton?
Gerald Ford (real name: Leslie Lynch King)
Notice the crescent and star
Harry S. Truman
Warren G. Harding
“The movement to erect a Masonic Memorial started at a meeting held in Alexandria, Virginia, on February 10, 1910. Upon invitation of Alexandria-Washington Lodge No. 22, the representatives of 18 Grand Lodges assembled in the sacred precincts of the Lodge Room of the city Hall of Alexandria to consider the subject in all its details. The following year, February 22, 1911, 27 representatives of 27 Grand Jurisdictions assembled and organized the George Washington Masonic National Memorial Association. The association unanimously adopted and approved a resolution to erect a Masonic Temple as a memorial to George Washington, under the auspices of the Lodge. The financial policy of the Association from the very beginning has been “pay as you go”, so that there is no indebtedness in connection with its construction. Ground was broken June 5, 1922…”
“The edifice is designed in the classic architecture of Greece and Rome. Situated on a 36 acre tract of land, it rises 333 feet from its foundation, and contains 9 floors. The records of the Lodge are virtually an unbroken chain of historic Masonic events from 1783 to the present time. All of the records, most of the original furniture, the Master’s Chair–presented to the Lodge by Washington and occupied by in 1788-1789 while Master–the original portrait of Washington by Williams, as well as several other items are still in possession of the Lodge.”
Sharing the Traditions of Our Founding Fathers
“Masons were active in Massachusetts even before 1733, the year the first Provincial Grand Lodge of Masons was formally organized by Henry Price. Today, the Grand Lodge in Boston remains the oldest continuously operating Masonic organization in the Western Hemisphere.
In the early years, Masonry numbered among its members some of the nation’s most influential citizens – among them George Washington, Henry Knox, Benjamin Franklin, John Hancock and Paul Revere.”
Paul Revere, Mason and Founding Father.
As Grand Master of Massachusetts,
Paul Revere wrote to Washington, March 21, 1797:
“Of these (Masonic teachings) may you partake in all their purity and satisfaction; and we will assure ourselves that your attachment to this social plan will increase; and that under the auspices of your encouragement, assistance and patronage, the Craft will attain its highest ornament, perfection, and praise. And it is our ardent prayer, that when your light shall be no more visible in this earthly temple, you may be raised to the All Perfect Lodge above; be seated on the right of the Supreme Architect of the Universe, and there receive the refreshment your labors merited.”
So were all the common people born equal?
Under God, perhaps. Under the constitution, absolutely not.
Remember, all people would include all black people as well. But Negros weren’t considered people in the constitution, and the founding fathers were most certainly plantation slave-owners! And let’s face it, women were hardly complete people either in terms of the fabled and fallacious “born equal” clauses that get parroted by unabashedly ill-informed patriots and nationalists out there. No vote = no equality.
Obviously, the constitution did not include Negros (slaves) as People.
And don’t even get me started on the genocide of the Native Indians, referred to as savages!
This again shows you clearly that the “People” referred to in the constitution did not include “all” (or any) common “people”, and thus the definitions of these capitalized legal words is paramount to our understanding of the true intent of these Masonic founding fathers. All men, according to the original constitution, are certainly not created equal. Some were in fact 3/5 men for purposes of statistical data in taxation, and the female ones weren’t really anything at all. The status of a legal and equal “woman” citizen was created only after “civil rights” was created, and so the female of the species man was able to assume the legal status of a male in contractual servitude as a wo-man. This did not create natural equality, for there is no such thing. It only created a political status. This specifically female version of man (mankind) furthers our understanding that the constitution was nothing but a legal document that only applied to specific artificial persons (as a legal status). Only God decides what is equal, and nature takes care of the rest. Equality will always be nothing if not a state of mind in all men (male and female), not a punishable, contractual obligation.
So indeed, this lets us know that the word “People” and the word “Men” were used to denote a specific legal status, not generally all men as natural flesh and blood beings, and certainly not colored men.
And again, I hope you take notice that people (as in the common human beings) were defined as “lower animals usually of a specified kind or situation’. We find this legal definition repeated in various chapters of U.S. Code, where man is defined as animal and is managed as a resource (chattel controlled through “human resources”).
The term blood oath as a sacra-ment should right about now take upon itself a whole new meaning…
Excerpts From The Holy Masonic Bible
This 1942 Masonic Bible quotes many writings, most notably Albert Pike’s: “Morals and Dogma”. Then follows a question and answer section, and these read like a history lesson in true American and Masonic history – the forbidden kind. Here I have reprinted some of those quotes for our purposes:
“A Lodge” is defined to be an assemblage of Freemasons, duly congregated, having the sacred writings, square, and compass, and a charter, or warrant of constitution, authorizing them to work. The room or place in which they meet, representing some part of King Solomon’s Temple, is also called the Lodge…” –Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma
“Force, unregulated or ill-regulated, is not only wasted in the void, like that of gunpowder burned in the open air, and steam unconfined by science; but, striking in the dark, and its blows meeting only in the air, they recoil and bruise itself. It is destruction and ruin, it is the volcano, the earthquake, the cyclone;– not growth and progress. It is Polyphemus blinded, striking at random, and falling headlong among the sharp rocks by the impetus of his own blows… The blind force of the people is a Force that must be economized, and also managed, as the blind Force of steam, lifting the ponderous iron arms and turning the large wheels, is made to bore and rifle the canon and to weave the most delicate lace. It must be regulated by Intellect.” –Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma
**Author’s Note: The U.S. military is a force regulated by Masonry, in order to keep the blind force of the common people (the employed) on a steady course to support and supply the nation and bloodlines.
“Christianity taught the doctrine of FRATERNITY; but repudiated that of political EQUALITY, by continually inculcating obedience to Caesar, and to those lawfully in authority. Masonry was the first apostle of EQUALITY. In the Monastery there is fraternity and equality, but no liberty. Masonry added that also, and claimed for man the three-fold heritage, (political) LIBERTY, EQUALITY, and FRATERNITY.” –Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma
“All religions express symbolism; since we can describe only what we see, and the true objects of religion are THE SEEN… All language is symbolic, so far as it applied to mental and spiritual phenomena and action. All words have, primarily, a material sense, however they may afterward get, for the ignorant, a spiritual non-sense.” –Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma
**Author’s Note: Pike here is speaking of the non-sense of the citizenry of the United States, who put spiritual relevance to the constitution, as well as follow religious dogma without understanding the hidden symbols and meaning of its words.
“After you become a Master Mason, no matter what added Masonic honor may come to you, no matter how high you may rise in the symbolic branches of the order, if you keep your vows as a Master Mason you have attained all there is, fulfilled all there is and received all there is to be received that fraternity and brotherhood, existing under a common impulse, can dispense among those who embrace the laws and edicts of a common procedure… Masonry, after all, is but a rule for orderly righteousness.” –Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma
**Author’s Note: “Orderly righteousness” describes government, the BAR society, law enforcement (Fraternities), congress, etc…
MOST EXCELLENT MASTER – Dedicated to the memory of King Solomon – The Masonic tradition upon which the degree is founded is described in the ancient Book of Constitutions, in the following words: “…it is still retained by us as a memorial of the method adopted by the King of Israel to distinguish the most skilful portion of the craft, and to reward them for their services in behalf of the fraternity.”
ORDER OF THE RED CROSS – “The Order of the Red Cross is founded upon Truth, recognizing the GOD OF TRUTH as the only true and living Deity… Influenced in a measure by his Jewish Friend, Prince Zerubbabel –(Chosen God)– and believing in the One God as did Israel, Darius registered a vow with God that he would rebuild His Temple at Jerusalem… The Law of Judaism was active, educating and preparing us for Christianity. As the most exalted TRUTH was implicitly present in Judaism and is now explicitly present in Christianity, so the candidate finds the TRUTH OF TRUTHS implicit in the Order of the Red Cross, but explicit in the Order of the Temple… As Judaism prepared the world for Christianity, so is the Illustrious Order of the Red Cross a preparation for the Christian Order of the Temple.”
REBUILDING THE TEMPLE – “Released from captivity by the decree of the great Cyrus, issued B.C. 536, the Jews, led by Zerubbabel, reached the then desolated Jerusalem on the 20th day of Tebeth, B.C. 535, and began building the Second Temple. This was finished the 23rd day of Adar, B.C. 515.”
**Author’s Note: Zerubbabel was the head of the tribe of Judah during the time of the return from the Babylon exile. He was the prime builder of the second Temple, which was later re-constructed by King Herod. He led the first group of captives back to Jerusalem and began rebuilding the Temple on the old site. For some 20 years he was closely associated with prophets, priests, and kings until the new Temple was dedicated and the Jewish sacrificial system was re-established. The “Third Temple” referred to above represents the building of the 3rd Temple of Solomon. Remember this above all else, for this goal is coming to fruition…
Rebuilding Solomon’s Temple
Creating A Religious Racial War
The Israel National News reported on 7/30/2012:
“Romney’s love for Jerusalem is part of his Mormon faith’s 170-year-old ties to Israel and its dictate to “rebuild the city and the Temple.”…
(Mark) Paredes, author of the newspaper’s “Jews and Mormons” blog, said that Latter Day Saints (LDS) “have dedicated the Land of Israel for the gathering of the Jewish people on many occasions, beginning with Elder Orson Hyde in 1841. In 1845, all of the apostles called on the Jews ‘in the name of the Messiah, to prepare, to return to Jerusalem in Palestine; and to rebuild that city and temple unto the Lord.’”
Public places in Netanya and on the Mount of Olives in Jerusalem have been dedicated to Hyde.
*Israel is the only country in the world whose creation was expressly called for and supported by Mormon leaders,” according to Paredes who added, “George Albert Smith, LDS Church President at the time of Israel’s creation in 1948, publicly and privately assured many Jewish leaders of his support for their efforts to establish a Jewish state.”
*Israel Bonds were first issued in 1951. One year later, Church President David O. McKay purchased $5,000 of Israel Bonds on behalf of the church, stating that he was doing this ‘to show our sympathy with the effort being made to establish the Jews in their homeland.’”
Romney’s love for Israel apparently is a personal love and not a political posture. Paredes wrote, “As more and more Jews and Israelis become familiar with the history of LDS-Jewish relations, they will better understand why Mormons feel a special closeness to them.”…”
The Times Of Israel, also on 7/30/2012, reported:
“MK Zevulun Orlev of the Jewish Home party has called for massive reforms, including new Basic Laws, in order to establish a Third Temple in Jerusalem.
In an article (PDF) published in advance of the fast of Tisha B’Av in the weekly Hebrew journal Olam Katan, entitled “Internal and Legislative Reform,” Orlev wrote that the Temple must be rebuilt in Jerusalem and that “fundamental changes” to Israeli society and government were necessary in order to realize the success of the project.
Besides spiritual reform and the creation of a cadre of religious experts capable of running the Temple, Orlev argued that the government — “assuming the government will choose to be democratic” — must turn back dissent surrounding the project.
“It will be necessary to defeat no-confidence motions, to overcome the hostile, left-wing, secular media, and to ignore eye-rolling economists who will say it’s a waste of public funds,” he wrote.
To forestall appeals to the High Court of Justice, Orlev advocated the legislation of a new Basic Law that would guarantee funding and manpower and protect the Third Temple from prosecution.
“The law will also protect the [Third Temple] project from accusations of discrimination, inequality of women in the Temple service, and animal cruelty in the offering of sacrifices,” Orlev continued.
Orlev acknowledged that to remove the “religious and political impediment” to his plan, namely the presence of the al-Aqsa Mosque and Dome of the Rock atop the Temple Mount, would mean that the “billion-strong Muslim world would surely launch a world war.” However, he added, “everything political is temporary and there is no stability,” and ”Of late we’re witnessed dramatic political changes that have occurred in many Arab countries.”
Orlev recently advocated a bill to bypass the High Court of Justice and protect illegally constructed buildings in the Beit El neighborhood of Givat Ulpana that was struck down by the Knesset in June.”
Now, I don’t know about you, but this is one of the most arrogant displays of carelessness and foulness I have ever beheld. To openly admit to the idea of starting a racial and religious war as planned for centuries is the epitome of Zionist horror and terrorism.
The rebuilding of Solomon’s Temple is the holy goal of international Masonry, this is clear. The Masonic Order is often referred to as the re-builders of Solomon’s Temple.
The “Third Temple“, or Ezekiel’s Temple (Hebrew: Beit haMikdash haShlishi), is a Jewish Holy Temple architecturally described and prophesied in the Book of Ezekiel, a house of prayer for all people with a sacrificial service. It is noted by Ezekiel as an eternal edifice and permanent dwelling place of the God of Israel on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem.
Issac Newton, a famous Mason, drew the following blueprint:
Within our Masonic Bible, the first section is dedicated to the “Building of Solomon’s Temple”, with many references and indexes throughout the book referring to its building and rebuilding. In describing a painting, it states:
Scene and Location: On Mount Moriah, within the walls of Jerusalem.
Principal Characters: King Solomon; Hifam, king of Tyre; Hiram Abif.
Particular Event Or Occasion: King David, Solomon’s father and predecessor on the throne of Israel, was forbidden by the Lord to build a temple because he was a man of war and had shed blood. He was assured, however, that his son would build the temple and he was permitted to gather large sums of money and to make other preparations for its construction. Soon after his succession to the throne, Solomon planned to build the temple within a period of seven years.
Details Of The Picture: …Hiram, king of Tyre, had been an intimate friend of David for many years, and in an alliance with the king of Israel had prepared much of the material for the temple in the forests of Mount Lebanon and in the quarries of his country. Hirm Abif, a skilled workman in metal, stone, and wood, was the principal architect and engineer. He served as Master Mason and overseer in the building of the temple, supervising the labors of the best workmen that could be found.
The Masonic Red Letter Edition King James Bible then enters into a question and answer chapter, which is entitled:
“Questions and Answers Relating to Characters, Places, Words and Phrases Used in Symbolic Masonry“.
Here is a selection of some of those printed within:
Q. Hebrew Language: Why is it of the greatest importance in Free-masonry?
A. Because the alphabet and its numerical values is the key to the greater number of words employed in Masonry as well as the mysteries of the Bible.
Q: “Illuminate”: What does it signify?
A: The enlightened, and is used on Latin diplomas as an epithet of Freemasons.
Q: Adam: The meaning of the name of the first man.
A: Adam – derived from the Hebrew ADaMaH – the ground. From AdAm, to be red, relating to his complexion. As the Solar allegory, takes us back 4200 years B.C.
Q: Abraham: In what degree of Masonry is he impersonated?
A: Order of the High Priest (Excellent) represented by Joshua, the first High Priest of the Jews (Zechariah, 3, 1-9, Page 567)
Q: Constitutions: In which year was the first Book of Constitutions published?
Ahiman Rezon, written by Laurence Dermott in 1764,
was the Book of Constitutions for the Ancients Grand Lodge,
a ritual that is still in wide usage. The title was derived from
three Hebrew words, “ahim“, “manah“, and “raizon“.
What does the term Ahiman Rezon mean?
At different times it has been interpreted as:
A Help to a Brother; Faithful Brother Secretary; Will of Selected Brethren;
Law of Prepared Brethren; Secrets of a Prepared Brother; Royal Builder;
and The Thoughts or Opinions of a True and Faithful Brother.
Q: Colors: What are the colors of Ancient Craft Masonry?
A: Entered Apprentice – White. Fellow Craft – Blue. Master Mason – Red. (Red, White, and Blue)
What the American Flag might have been…
Q: Guilds: What three classes existed in England?
A: Religious guilds of the Church of Rome, Merchant guilds in the Livery Companies of London, Craft guilds as in the present day Trade Unions.
Q: Occasions (Four): Upon what occasions may the “Grand Honors” of Masonry be given?
A: When a “Masonic Hall” is to be consecrated: a “Master-Elect” to be installed: a “New Lodge” to be constituted; or a “Grand Master, or deputy to be received on an official visitation.”
Q: From what country was American Freemasonry derived?
Q: Masonically, what may be said of the Boston Tea Party?
A: It had its installation in a Masonic Lodge Room, participating in the raid, all were Masons.
“Sponsered by the George Washington Masonic Stamp Club.”
Q: Was Masonry practiced in the Revolutionary Army?
Q: Who was the first Master of Alexandria Lodge No. 22, Alexandria, Va.?
A: George Washington.
Q: What change was later made in the name of this Lodge?
A: Alexandria Washington Lodge No. 22, A.D. 1805.
Q: Did Washington follow the Masonic custom when he laid the cornerstone of the new Capitol building in 1793?
A: No. It was laid in the South East corner.
Q: Name five of the ten early Presidents of the United States who were Masons.
A: Washington, Monroe, Jackson, Polk, Buchanan.
Q: What distinguished French officer in the Revolutionary War was a Mason?
A: Marquis de Lfayette, who was made a Mason in an army Lodge at Valley Forge by Washington himself.
Q: Who presented Washington with an embroidered satin apron?
A: Madame Lafayette. The apron was conveyed by the Marquis from Paris to General Washington at Mt. Vernon. It is preserved by the Washington Benevolent Society at Philadelphia, and the Grand Lodge of Pennsylvania. It is the most prized relic of Masonry in the U.S.A.
Q: Where was the first Masonic hall erected in America?
A: Philadelphia, A.D. 1734.
In the 1700s, J.J.C Bode wrote about the Masons in France, which were called the Philadelphes:
“We agreed… for France, we would adopt the name Philadelphes instead of Illuminati.”
In a document titled “Grand Lodge of the Philadelphes – General Statutes” dated 1861, a Communication issued from E. Benoit, the President of the Grand Lodge of Philadelphes in 1860 states:
“Moreover one must judge of a tree by its fruits. Well, can you mention within your vast Masonic empire a single Lodge that has produced such results? In the space of ten years, she has initiated above 300 profanes; she has founded Lodges in Belgium, Switzerland, England, as you well know, and America; and her children, indefatigable apostles of Masonry, have raised the first Masonic temple at Ballarat.”
Q: By what name were the Masons anciently known?
A: Long before the building of Solomon’s Temple, Masons were known as the “Sons of Light“.
It’s a Phoenix, not an Eagle!
“Like its Patron Order – Free Masonry – The Order of the Eastern Star inculcates and promotes the principles of loyalty to one’s country, and of obedience to civil law. Its tenets enforce the fundamentals of freedom, equal rights and liberties to all, and the extension of these privileges to all the peoples of the earth. It undertakes to prepare the women of this age for the righteous performances of their enlarged civil and political privileges which have been given to them through the influence of Christianity. It teaches its members of every race and nationality to honor the flag of their native land.”
Pay attention to my right hand…
while my left hand points to the American flag with its stars upside down.
Q: Masonry: The probable antiquity?
A: It is admitted that Masonry is descended from the Ancient Mysteries. These were first arranged when the constellation Leo was at the Summer Solstice. The solar allegory proves this a fact, and would take us back to 4200 years B.C. Thus the Antiquity of Masonry is written in the starry heavens.
Q: Moses: Who is he?
A: The lawgiver of the Jews who plays an important part in the Holy Royal Arch of the American York Rite.
Q: What is the meaning of the name Moses?
A: It is derived from two Hebrew words “Moce” and “oushes” signifies “saved from the water“.
Q: Lodge of St. John: What is it?
A: Masonic tradition says this was the primitive Mother Lodge, held at Jerusalem, dedicated to St. John the Baptist, and then to St. John the evangelist, and finally to both, called “The Lodge of the Holy Sts. John of Jerusalem, and from this Lodge, all other Lodges descended.”
Q: Origins: What is the 12 generally accepted origins of Masonry?
A: Patriarchal Religion, Ancient Mysteries, Temple of Solomon, To the Crusaders, To the Knights Templars, to the Roman Colleges of Artificers, To the Operative Masons of the Middle Ages, To the Rosicrucians, To Oliver Cromwell for political reasons, To the Pretender for the restoration of the House of Stuart, to the British throne, to Sir Christopher Wren, to Dr Desaguliers and others in 1717.
Dr. John Theophilus Desaguliers
member of the Royal Society of London
beginning 29 July 1714.
Experimental assistant to Mason Sir Isaac Newton
Third Grand Master in 1719, and Deputy Grand Master in 1723
and 1725 of the Premier Grand Lodge of England
Q: Triangular Chain: What is the legend of the triangular chain?
A: When the Jewish Masons were led in captivity from Jerusalem to Babylon by Nebuchadnezzar, they were bound by triangular chains, as an insult, because, to them the triangle was a symbol of Deity, to be made use of only on sacred occasions.
The Double triangle
The Star of David? Or is there more to this symbol?
Solomon’s Seal at Lion’s Gate, Old Jerusalem wall
Rosicrucian Museum, San Jose, California
Hexagram and Rose Cross, Rosicrucian Museum, San Jose, California
The Rosy Cross (Rose Cross and Rose Croix) Symbol of Christian Rosenkreuz,
Qabbalist and alchemist and founder of the Rosicrucian Order.
From “History & Doctrines of the Rose-Croix” by Paul Sedir, we get a description of the Rose Cross as “one of the manifestations of the Providence of God.”:
“But the Earth is constitutionally incapable of conserving the gift which God has given it for long without deforming it; man has the power to stray from the road which had been drawn out for him. Then Divine Mercy sends beings who bring hope; or an exemplar who comes among men to play the role fulfilled by the comets in the cosmos. Such is the function of secret societies; such is the mission of the messengers of the Absolute, notably the Rose-Croix.”
On page 23, Sedir explains the 8-symbol “Rose”:
“After triangular emblems, the seal of Brahatma and the triangle of the holy syllable, the most ancient Masonic emblem which the ancient priesthood has bequeathed is that of the Rose-Croix… This rose was placed in the center of a cross, because the latter expressed to them the idea of rectitude and infinity; of rectitude, by the intersection of its lines at a right angle and of infinity, because these lines can be extended to infinity and that, by a rotation made by the thought about the verticle line, they represent the triple senses of hight, breadth and depth.”
Freemasons = The Sons Of Light
The Lesser Key of Solomon.
Crescent and six pointed Star from the seal of the
Jewish Community of Regensburg, Germany, Middle ages
Solomon’s Seal opposite the entrance to the Rockefeller Museum
formerly the Palestine Archaeological Museum, in East Jerusalem
Solomon’s Seal by the “New Gate” in wall surrounding Old Jerusalem
Solomon’s Seal in Jaffa Gate of Old Jerusalem wall,
also called “Gate of the Prayer Niche of David”; also David’s Gate
Door Knocker on Jewish home in Haifa
Arab Star of David
Contemporary Crescent and six pointed Star in the old City of Jerusalem.
In Arabic this crescent emblem is called hilal.
The origin of the now famous Islamic symbol of the five pointed star and the crescent was not Islamic but Sassanian, and at first it had six points on the star. The five pointed star and the crescent actually became a symbol of Islam only during the 19th century, placed on the Ottoman flag from 1793. It entered the Turkish Flag in 1923 and then was adopted by other Muslim countries.
The ancient Crescent and six pointed Star also appear on a Roman Denarius minted by Augustus (27 BC-CE 14):
The Sassanid Empire was founded by Ardashir I, after the fall of the Arsacid Empire and the defeat of the last Arsacid king, Artabanus V. According to the Encyclopedia of the Peoples of Asia and Oceania, “at its largest point in the seventh century the Sassanid Empire included territory in contemporary Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Afghanistan, Yemen, Oman, Israel, Lebanon, Syria, United Arab Emirates, Jordan, Turkey, Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, and parts of Kazakhstan, Pakistan, India, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Libya, Kyrgyzstan. and Tajikistan.” It was the last pre-Islamic Persian Empire, ruled by the Sasanian Dynasty from 224 CE to 651 CE. The Sassanid Empire, which succeeded the Parthian Empire, was recognized as one of the main powers in Western and Central Asia, alongside the Roman-Byzantine Empire, for a period of more than 400 years.
Michael G. Morony, in his book Iraq After the Muslim Conquest (p. 40) states that the star and the crescent were combined for the first time on coins of Khosrau I the twentieth Sassanid Emperor (also called Chosroes I, and Anushirvan (r. 531–579). Hurmizd IV replaced the six pointed star in some of his coins with a five pointed star. This tradition continued on coins of the seventh century. After the conquest of Iraq the Muslim Government accepted these coins as well. This tradition lasted until 695 or 696, when coins were minted without any images.
The Mormon Church Assembly Hall at Temple Square, Salt Lake City
Mormon sun worship of light bearers
Notice the 6 pointed stars above the 5 pointed stars
suggesting the geometrical universe of unity and duality
Mormon ceremonial apron
Mormon Church History Building, Salt Lake City
The Mormon “Moon Stones”.
Religions can’t have the male morning star
without the female crescent moon.
Amiens Cathedral, north window, France
St. Mary’s Church, Adderbury
What a lovely snake…
Also known as the “Great Beast 666”
Notice the triangle light rays are in the form of the Seal of Solomon.
Both the 5 and 6 pointed star are revealed here.
Notice here the symbol of two snakes used in
the modern “practice” of the craft of medicine.
Both attorney’s and doctors practice in their craft monopolies.
The Book Of Shadows
Madonna at the Super Bowl – The symbols mean the same thing and
have the same ancient origin. This is no concert. it is a ritual ceremony…
A ceremony to usher in the coming of the merged New World Religion,
including the rebuilding of Solomon’s Temple.
Yeah, she’s a very revealing, classy broad
Terry Richardson – The Star is universal in sacred geometry, as seen below
The Pentagram fits within the star…
the star within the pentagram, ad infinity.
Masonry revolves around Sacred Geometry.
The image of a geometrically perfect star goes on forever,
alternating between upside-down and right-side up.
Ameth is Hebrew for truth.
The Sigil of Dei Ameth (Sigillum Dei Ameth) is used as a Seal of the truth of God.
The Oval Office of the White House
As the president enters, he walks under the Sacred Masonic Arch.
Under the arch, a single Fasce hovers over the doorway,
as the rays of the sun shine out from the carpet’s great seal.
The desk – an empty workspace…
for this office is but a staged museum.
“Whereas the Founding Fathers of this great Nation
and signers of the Constitution, most of whom were Freemasons,
provided a well-rounded basis for developing themselves
and others into valuable citizens of the United States…”
–House Resolution #33, 110th Congress
The Pentagon in Washington D.C. is a symbol of the 33 degrees of masonry.
Its angles are even at 33 degrees, creating a pentagram with a pentagram in the center.
Designed by John Whiteside Parsons, high priest in the Ordo Templi Orientis,
also called the ‘Order of the Temple of the East’ or ‘Order of Oriental Templars’.
See Eastern Star symbol above, the women’s sect of Masonry.
The mystery of Pentalpha (Pythagarium)
Osiris Pentalpha Lodge #23
The two flags of Masonry
Why is the sacred Seal of Solomon designed with stars on the dollar bill?
Or did you even notice?
Darpa’s actual logo
“The Freemasons of the United States have, by tacit consent,
referred to it (the pentagram) as a symbol of the Five Points of Fellowship.
The outlines of the five pointed star are the same as those of the pentalpha or Pythagoras”
—Encyclopedia of Freemasonry: Page 358
“William Preston, the eminent Masonic student, scholar, writer, who lived and wrote in the latter part of the eighteenth century, conceived the idea of making the degrees in general, and the Fellowcraft degree in particular, a liberal education! A ‘liberal education’ in those days was comprised within what we still call, after Preston, the ‘seven liberal arts and sciences.’ In those days any mathematics beyond geometry was only for the very, very few. Indeed, mathematics were looked upon as being something not meant for the common men, as being of small use in the world, save for engineers and designers and measurers of land…
Below is a quote that is 1800 years old.
“…let one of these be that art which prepares the body to be subservient, as a prompt and robust vehicle, to the mandates of the soul, and which is denominated gymnastic. Let another art be that which is the angel of the conceptions of the soul, and which is called rhetoric; another, that which is the nurse and tutor of the juvenile mind, and which is denominated poetry; another that which is the leader of the nature of numbers, and which is called arithmetic; and another that which is the teacher of computation, and is called logistic. Let geometry, also, and music follow, who are the associates of philosophy and conscious of her arcana, and to each of which she distributes a portion of her labour.” —Maximus Tyrius (circa 200 CE) “Dissertation”, xxi, translated by Thomas Taylor(1758-1835)
These differ little from those delineated in later times and would still have great implications when applied in today’s modern world.
H.P.H. Bromwell (1823 -1903) wrote in his massive tome Restorations of Masonic Geometry and Symbolry that: “Although the number of recognized sciences far exceeds seven, yet, giving to that number the benefit of its symbolic meaning, it stands for the whole circle of sciences, whether specifically named among the seven or not.”
We usually associate the seven liberal arts to medieval education curriculum, at this time in Masonic circles the only education available may I suggest that an educated member of a lodge was more useful especially if he could apply geometry to his work….
The 47Th proposition of the first book of Euclid.
The Pythagorean Theorem states that for any right triangle the sum of the squares of its two legs equals the square of its hypotenuse (a2 + b2 = c2). Or we could frame it as the sum of the square of the horizontal and the square of the perpendicular equals the square of the hypotenuse. This is what became known as Euclid’s 47 Proposition… We also know this formulation was known before Pythagoras – there is evidence in ancient Egyptian work, ancient China (the Chou Pei manuscript), and the megalith builders… This theory, commonly known as the “Pythagorean theorem,” shows that the sum of the squares of the legs of a right triangle is equal to the squares of the hypotenuse or (A X 2) + (B X 2) = (C X 2)… Regardless, it is attributed to Pythagoras and two hundred years later Euclid compiled his “Elements of Mathematics” where this particular 47Th proposition is found in Book One… This theorem has been called the root of all geometry and the cornerstone of mathematics. The practical applications alone are worthy of the high esteem that Masonry affords it. And this is the interpretation of the lecture that is most considered when masons speak of it but the meaning of this hieroglyphical emblem does not stop there… The emblem we are usually presented is the 3,4,5 right triangle in this fashion: The vertical line is of 3 units, the horizontal is of 4 units, and the hypotenuse is of 5 units. Not only is our attention called to this geometrical figure in the Master Mason degree, it is also prominent in the Scottish Rite in the 20th Degree – Master of the Symbolic Lodge and in the 25th Degree – Knight of the Brazen Serpent… Geometry treats of the powers and properties of magnitudes in general, where length, breath, and thickness, are considered, from a point to a line, from a line to a superficies (surface of a body), and from a superficies to a solid… By this science, the architect is enabled to construct his plans, and execute his designs; the general to arrange his soldiers; the engineer to mark out ground for encampments; the geographer to give us the dimensions of the World, and all things within, to delineate the extent of seas, and specify the divisions of empires, kingdoms and provinces; by it, also, the astronomer is enabled to make his observations, and to fix the duration of times and seasons, years and cycles. In fine, geometry is the foundation of architecture, and the root of mathematics.”
—“Geometry And Masonry: Sacred Geometry”, by Brother Harvey Lovewell, Lodge Millaa Millaa #351, United Grnd Lodge of Queensland, Au.
For more information on the importance of the ancient liberal arts in education and how it has been purposefully perverted and usurped by today’s “general arts” education for the dumbed down common people, please visit Jan Irvin’s website at:
Pay special attention to the “fallacy” links. Learn them and avoid
this most sacred tool of illicit word trickery by the law society – the logical fallacy.
With the study of Pythagarium, the true building blocks of nature begin to emerge through this sacred geometry, including the Golden Mean (Golden ratio), the Fibionachi series, the Divine Proportion, etc…
This is the beauty and sacred math in all life on Earth.
This is the mathematical perfection of nature.
Some say it is Sacred Geometry.
Some say it’s God.
The Owl, The Bull, The God
Eliphas Levi, a nineteenth-century satanist whose works inspired the writings of Albert Pike, the Sovereign Grand Commander of international Freemasonry. Levi enthusiastically reports: The pentagram with two horns in the ascendant represents Satan, or the goat of the Sabbath. (The horn) downward naturally represents the demon, that is, intellectual subversion, disorder and folly. Esoterically, the star symbolizes man as deity, as the universe embodied. It also stands for Sirius, the “Dog Star” or planet where Satan dwells. It stands for “Thor”, the ancient Nordic God, and it stands for Baal, or Bel, the demonic God so often mentioned in derisive terms in the Old Testament. This same star God was worshiped in Egypt, and the children of Israel, while wandering in the desert, fell under his hypnotic powers. They called him Moloch, Chiun, and Remphan. The prophet Amos castigated the Jewish idolaters for this unholy sacrilege: But ye have borne the tabernacle of your Moloch and Chiun your images, the star of your God, which ye made to yourselves…
Reportedly hanging out on the dollar bill,
Molech is portrayed as the (feminine) owl is hiding in plain sight.
I can neither confirm or deny that this is actually an owl.
However, this short video is helpful in that determination:
But this is the least of our worries regarding Moloch worship…
For Molech was and still is worshiped in the church and state Temples.
A press club in government (Washington D.C.)? An owl (Molech),
Aladdin’s Lamp, and emanating sun rays upon its “seal”?
Bohemian Grove, the origin of the National Press Club.
“Weaving spiders come not here”.
Moloch, Molech, Molekh, Molok, Molek,
Molock, Moloc, Melech, Milcom or Molcom
“Originally a Canaanite god to whom human sacrifices were offered.”
“Later, he was a general symbol of authorities that corrupt
or destroy humans, especially inhuman political systems”
—The Continuum Encyclopedia of Symbols (2000 Edition),Udo Becker: –
Moloch (מלך m-l-k, “king”) is the name of an ancient Ammonite god. Moloch worship was practiced by the Canaanites, Phoenicians, other North African cultures and the Levant (Arabic: بلاد الشام Bilād ash-Shām or المشرق العربي al-Mashrīq al-‘Arabiyy; Hebrew: כְּנָעַן Kənáʿan). It involved child sacrafice by the parents of said children by fire as payment to the idol statue. In the Old Testament, Gehenna was a valley by Jerusalem, where apostate Israelites and followers of various Baalim and Caananite gods, including Moloch, sacrificed their children by fire (2 Chr. 28:3, 33:6; Jer. 7:31, 19:2–6).
“And thou shalt not let any of thy seed pass through the fire to Moloch”.
“Then did Solomon build a high place for Chemosh, the abomination of Moab,
in the hill that is before Jerusalem, and lmlk, the abomination of the Sons of Ammon.”
–1 Kings 11:7
“Moreover he burnt incense in the valley of the son of Hinnom,
and burnt his children in the fire, after the abominations of the heathen
whom the LORD had cast out before the children of Israel.”
–2 Chronicles 28:3
“But ye have borne the tabernacle of your Moloch and Chiun your images,
the star of your god, which ye made to yourselves.“
-Amos 5:26 (KJB)
“Yea, ye took up the tabernacle of Moloch, and the star of your god Remphan,
figures which ye made to worship them: and I will carry you away beyond Babylon.”
The Tabernacle (Hebrew: משכן, mishkan, meaning “residence”, “house”, or “dwelling place”), according to the Hebrew Bible, was the portable dwelling place for the divine presence from the time of the Exodus from Egypt through the conquering of the land of Canaan. Built to specifications revealed by God (Yahweh) to Moses at Mount Sinai, it accompanied the Israelites on their wanderings in the wilderness and their conquest of the Promised Land. The First Temple (of Solomon) in Jerusalem superseded it as the dwelling-place of God. There is no mention of the Tabernacle in the Tanakh after the destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple by the Babylonians in 587 BCE.
The fullest description of the Tabernacle describes an inner shrine (named Holy of Holies) housing the Ark of the Covenant and an outer chamber (Holy Place) with a golden lampstand (for the menorah), table for showbread (Bread of Presence – cakes or loaves of bread which were always present on a specially dedicated table in the Temple of Jerusalem as an offering to “God”), and an alter of incense. Many scholars contend that the description reflects the structure of the Temple of Solomon, while some hold that the description derives from memories of a real pre-monarchic shrine, perhaps the sanctuary at Shiloh. Traditional scholars contend that it describes an actual tabernacle used in the time of Moses and thereafter.
Depiction of the Menorah on the Arch of Titus in Rome,
being carried with the portable Tabernacle (Divine Presence of God).
“Again, you shall say to the Sons of Israel: Whoever he be of the Sons of Israel or of the strangers that sojourn in Israel, that gives any of his seed l’Molech; he shall surely be put to death: the people of the land shall stone him with stones. And I will set my face against that man and will cut him off from among his people; because he has given of his seed l’Molech, to defile my sanctuary, and to profane my holy name. And if the people of the land do at all hide their eyes from that man, when he gives of his seed l’Molech, and do not kill him, then I will set my face against that man, and against his family, and will cut him off, and all that go astray after him, whoring l’Molech from among the people.”
“And he defiled the Tophet, which is in the valley of Ben-hinnom,
that no man might make his son or his daughter pass through the fire l’Molech.”
–2 Kings 23:10
“And they built the high places of the Ba‘al, which are in the valley of Ben-hinnom,
to cause their sons and their daughters to pass through the fire l’Molech;
which I did not command them, nor did it come into my mind
that they should do this abomination, to cause Judah to sin.”
It is ironic that the Bible is deemed extremely violent in such chapters as Leviticus, turning many away from its lessons and warnings. And yet, such violence stems from literally destroying those who would worship Satan and sacrifice children to him and other deities in the tabernacles, idols, and in the Temples of Solomon. And today, as the Temple is being planned and rebuilt and as the laws are changed to allow animal “sacrifice” in the Temple, as World War 3 is being spoken about openly as a racially cloaked religious war, these violent pages in the Bible are completely lost on the population of today as they head into the new age without knowledge and without the dignity to fight this ancient foe. This is the regression of humanity into the darkest of new ages…
And I honestly wonder how many parents out there would say no to human sacrifice – and how many would defend their children to the death? I honestly fear not nearly enough.
The 12th-century Rashi, commenting on Jeremiah 7:31, stated:
“Tophet is Moloch, which was made of brass; and they heated him from his lower parts; and his hands being stretched out, and made hot, they put the child between his hands, and it was burnt; when it vehemently cried out; but the priests beat a drum, that the father might not hear the voice of his son, and his heart might not be moved.”
A rabbinical tradition attributed to the Yalkout of Rabbi Simeon, explains that the idol was hollow and was divided into seven compartments, in one of which they put flour, in the second turtle-doves, in the third a ewe, in the fourth a ram, in the fifth a calf, in the sixth an ox, and in the seventh a child, which were all burned together by heating the statue inside.
Molech is rarely depicted as an owl, which represents the feminine aspect of the god. It’s dominant male persona is generally the bull-headed man.
A father sacrificing his own son…
(“Der Götze Moloch” i.e. The Idol Moloch).
An 18th-century German illustration of Moloch
with sacrificial ovens built in.
The Flight of Moloch, watercolour, 1809.
Illustration by William Blake for John Milton’s
poem entitled: “On The Morning Of Christ’s Nativity“
In Milton’s “Nativity” poem, Molech is listed among the chiefs of Satan’s fallen angels in Book I, and is given a speech at the parliament of Hell in Book 2:43 – 105, where he argues for immediate warfare against God. He later becomes revered as a pagan god on Earth.
Baphomet – male and female,
sun and moon
Other male/female dualities in gods,
a balancing of the generative energies.
Map of the location of the Capital Building (Legislature) in Washington D.C.
The “Congress Building” literally sits inside the belly of the god (beast) Molech.
George Bush Jr. – the greatest bloodline pretender, ever
“I tell people all the time, you’re equally American if you’re a Christian, Jew, or Muslim.
You’re equally American if you believe in an Almighty or
don’t believe in an Almighty. That’s a sacred freedom.”
–George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Mar. 10, 2006
“I trust God speaks through me. Without that, I couldn’t do my job.”
–George W. Bush, during a campaign visit to Amish community,
Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, Jul. 9, 2004
“I couldn’t imagine somebody like Osama bin Laden
understanding the joy of Hanukkah.”
–George W. Bush, White House, Dec. 10, 2007.
“We have a calling from beyond the stars to stand for freedom,
and America will always be faithful to that cause.”
–George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Jan. 19, 2005
“All of you — all in this generation of our military —
have taken up the highest calling of history.
You’re defending your country, and protecting the innocent from harm.
And wherever you go, you carry a message of hope —
a message that is ancient and ever new. In the words of the prophet Isaiah,
“To the captives, ‘come out,’ — and to those in darkness, ‘be free’. “
–George W. Bush, Aboard the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln,
a couple of miles away from San Diego May 1, 2003
More Answers Revealed
Q: Lodge: When is it said to be Just?
A: When furnished with the Great Lights.
Q: Lodge: When is it said to be Perfect?
A: When it contains the constitutional numbers of members.
Q: Lodge: When is it said to be Regular?
A: When working under Charter, legally authorized.
Q: Lodges of the World: What is the connecting bond between them?
A: Lawful Authority. No Lodge can exist and work without authority.
Q: Solar metal: What is it?
The Goyim can be made to covet anything.
For gold is the destroyer of nations and men…
Q: Freemasonry: What is the earliest mention made of it?
A: John Moore came from England to South Carolina in 1680. A letter written by him in 1715 says he spent a few evenings with Masonic Brothers.
Q: Who were Modern Masons?
A: Supporters of the Grand Lodge of England.
Q: Who were Ancient Masons?
A: The Irish Masons who formed a rival Grand Lodge in London.
Q: Were these rival Grand Lodges represented in America?
A: Yes. The Ancients became popular and organized in Massachusetts, New York, Pennsylvania, Virginia, South Carolina, where they worked as “Ancient York Lodges.”
Q: What effect did they have on American Masonry?
A: Dissensions arose between the Ancients and Moderns.
Q: What year was a reconciliation effected between the two Grand Lodges in England?
Q: Was a similar union consummated in America?
A: Yes. The two Grand Lodges of South Carolina were the last Grand Lodges to unite in 1817 and the distinction between Ancients and Moderns was abolished.
Q: What was the attitude of the Colonial Lodges toward the Revolution?
A: The Ancients favored the Colonies. The Moderns, the Crown.
Q: What State adheres to the Ancients?
Q: What State has the greatest number of Lodges?
Q: Washington: Did he ever hold the office of Grand Master?
A: While the army for independence was encamped at winter quarters (1779) in Morristown, New Jersey, he was unanimously elected the Grand Master of Masons of the American Colonies but due to the war and the upset conditions at the time he never did serve, but in the hearts of American Masons he was considered the first and only Grand Master of American Freemasons, and was at that time considered the most eminent Mason of his time, evidenced by the unanimous vote cast for him to become Grand Master of the Grand Lodge of American Freemasons.
This brings us to the end of part 2 of this essay series. In my final writing, we will read over the constitution with a fine-toothed comb, removing any semblance of rose-colored glasses, and tear that compact apart, article by article, right by right. The theocracy is now come out into the open; a Masonic guild of ecclesiastical law and enforcement ruled by blood. And this journey is nearing its end. The question is, what are you going to do with this knowledge now?
For the truth and only the truth can indeed set you free.
And hope is all that stands in the way of action.
All ye who enter here abandon hope, for without it, ye are a reckoning force. With it, ye are as a docile lamb at the slaughter.
–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Tuesday, August 13th, 2013