The average Christian in this world has been sold on the idea that they can buy their way into heaven, through the middle-man salesmen priest of their perspective church and its particular doctrine, as if this will somehow wash away their sins just like the three credit rating agencies can magically wipe away a bad credit score.
If I were a man on the street and I made the claim that for $100 dollars I could save your soul by somehow bypassing God Himself and His wrathful judgement, I’d be locked up in the nearest asylum (run by nuns) and charged with conspiracy to defraud the public. But if I incorporate and call myself a 501(c)3 religion, suddenly that same sales pitch becomes authorized by law and fervently protected by government… all 40,000 of them!
But did anyone ever do their due diligence and check the Bible to see if this was actually what’s supposed to happen?
Does the definition of what a Christian is and which path he or she is supposed to walk have anything to do with a corporate religion, a religious doctrine, a constitution of legal de facto government, or even a church? Can a man buy love, purchase forgiveness, tithe for his sins with the money of Caesar (government), and then step up to knock-knock-knock on Heaven’s door in forgiveness of these Biblical no-no’s? Can a church give men license to sin in exchange for the payment of blessings from priests in ceremonial robes?
Surprisingly, the answers to all of these questions within the Bible are both shocking and beautiful… And they all begin with the words absolutely not! The Bible does not say these things, and it does not bestow status on men to act in God’s or Jesus Christ’s name as a vicar (replacement) – which is surprisingly the claimed basis of all legal authority in religion and government (church and state).
But the church and state sure wants you to think it does…
Words like saved, salvation, and redemption are part of an alternative language not taught to most church-going folks, for these are the words of attorneys and lawyers – the language of secret societies and Orders that seek power and control through govern-ment (mind control) of the masses, so that we may never be free from the self-imposed debt that can only be forgiven through the comprehension of the Bible and its legal interpretation.
The first time I even began to contemplate the power of the Bible was when a friend entered the whole Bible as evidence of his clients personal credo of law into a federal court… and it was accepted and honored without question!
Then, some time later, I was approached by a man who tried to convince me to do what he was doing, which was to copy what the wealthy in-the-know business elite do. He explained that the registrar loved it when the elitist few brought in the King James “authorized” 1611 Bible and claimed it as law, utilizing it in the creation of a trust to turn the artificial person (strawman) attached as the surname into a not-for-profit corporation, where the new “trust” controlled the name, and then proceeded to show me all of the IRS tax forms that these society men utilized to get all of their tax dollars back in “redemption” at the end of each year. All of this was based on entering the legally “authorized” Bible as evidence of law. And while at first I was intrigued, I quickly realized this road was not for me, and that it was steeped in comprehensible participation of the fraud of the system. I chose not to benefit from this organized corruption. And the secretive gent has never contacted me again, asking me not to share what he told me.
I later learned that the word trust, as do many words in the legal language, means the opposite of its vernacular (common) usage. It goes something like this:
—> A trust Maxim of law: when someone is in possession of something which they do not have a legal right to, then they are the “trustee” of that thing.
Needless to say, this made me want to learn more about this Bible and how it was being used in law! And this began a journey of discovery and actualization that I never thought I’d take. I started reading the Bible and cross-referencing the words with the legal language of the law society. And what I found was an exact match!
Before we can understand how to use the language of the Bible as a remedy in law, we must first define legally the words of that Sacred Book so as to comprehend the legal process hidden within. For they are of the same language. Only then can we be successful in the utilization of the Bible as a legal remedy within the legal language of the law society to escape the laws of man and mammon. In truth, anyone who has read the Bible will need to reread it once they learn this dualistic legal code, which naturally is the code of church and state.
It is ironic, really, that the powers that be (church and state) have divided these two languages of man’s legal law and the Bible. To create this division in the understanding of men through this separation of the togetherness of church and state, which both claim the same authority to rule men under God’s name under oath (defined as taking God’s name in vain), the separation of the temporal and the spiritual had to be accomplished. I now understand that this was an important step in conquering the minds of men within the powerful G20 (Gentile 20) nations. We must understand that there is no true redemption for mankind in the temporal (nonspiritual) legal law alone, for the law of men only deals with strawmen – artificial persons as corporations that are created as fictions of law and owned through letters patent by government, where the spirituality of the soul is rejected as being encased within the vessel (legal body of man). Thus a living spiritually inclined man will never find true remedy in legal law alone while acting as a legal fictional person under man’s laws, and certainly not in the constitution that created that legal fiction. For God’s laws and nature itself have no place in fiction except in name (noun) only.
On the other hand there is the Bible, to which the priests in their own religious societies never reveal the true legal language of that sacred Tome. So it is equally accurate to say that no fictional “person” or citizen of a soulless State will ever find remedy within the Bible, for the Bible is for the sentient and stateless mankind alone, and persons are mere legal fictions of mankind (secular government) that are not to be respected according to the Bible. Thus a citizen (person; an enfranchised man) will never be able to utilize the Bible as remedy, for persons (names) have no essence or “soul”, and are not found in nature (where the Bible exclaims is the natural law of God). Persons are creations of law (of man’s law), not God. And yet the priest-class continuously bombard their parishioners with fallacy confiding patriotism through God’s will for legal law issued by government (man) as “the law of the land”, when in fact all the Earth and land is under the law of God and nature – as God’s creation not man’s.
But the bridge between the linguistic code written in the Bible and what is written in the legal code is never crossed while “educating” the masses. Church and State are indeed one, and cannot be separated, for the authority of all law is based on God’s authority seeded to men. Indeed, if this relationship were ever discovered, all good men would turn away from fiction and choose to be free under God’s law and no longer be enslaved by man’s legal fiction, exactly as the Bible instructs us to escape. And no slaves would be left to run the machine of mammon (money).
I am well on my way to cracking this Code, and so I want to share with you what I’ve uncovered so far. Whatever your opinion or beliefs about religion and the Bible are, they do not apply here. I’m not interested in proving the existence of anything but what exists in nature that can be proven. The nature of God or lack thereof is for you to decide individually, and has absolutely no relevance within this discussion. The words we will be defining here are straight out of the Bible AND the legal dictionaries of government. When you comprehend that these things are one in the same, and that the Bible is the hidden authority of the laws of the men in government and religion, you will have your own revelation that I cannot imagine one to be able to put into words.
The word abandon, for instance, may be defined as two seemingly opposite concepts. Abandon on one hand means totally free and unhindered expression of will, while in the same definition it may also mean to leave something behind. But for our purposes, we must certainly combine these definitions in our comprehension that in order to be free and unhindered in our lives as free men (in abandon) under God (under the laws of nature), we must also abandon and leave behind permanently the ties that bind us in chains of debt and obligation to government (mammon). In other words, we must abandon our person so as to 100% of the time act as living beings (in abandon). A man that carries a commercial entity in the form of an artificial person in commerce with government (mammon) in truth carries around a “demon”, and therefore cannot live life in abandon.
Webster’s 1828 dictionary defines the word demon as:
“signifying an evil spirit or genius, which influences the conduct or directs the fortunes of mankind“.
And just what exactly is an evil “genius”?
Genius – n. [Latin from the root of gigno; Gr. to beget.] 1. Among the ancients, a good or evil spirit or demon supposed to preside over a man’s destiny in life, that is, to direct his birth and actions and be his guard and guide; a tutelary deity; the ruling and protecting power of men, places or things. This seems to be merely a personification or deification of the particular structure or bent of mind which a man receives from nature, which is the primary signification of the word. 2. The peculiar structure of mind which is given by nature to an individual, or that disposition or bent of mind which is peculiar to every man, and which qualifies him for a particular employment; a particular natural talent or aptitude of mind for a particular study or course of life; as a genius for history, for poetry or painting. 3. Strength of mind; uncommon powers of intellect, particularly the power of invention. In this sense we say, Homer was a man of genius. Hence, 4. A man endowed with uncommon vigor of mind; a man of superior intellectual faculties. Shakespeare was a rare-genius. (Webster’s 1828)
An evil genius (demon) might be one who, let’s say, creates a doctrine of “Christian” religion that goes completely against the teachings of the character of Jesus Christ, incorporates that doctrine into a corporate church, and then deceives all the followers of that religion that its word is not only of and inspired by God, but that his genius is the only true interpretation of the will of God as God’s spokesman and author. And thus one of a thousand religions is born, completely hiding the fact that religion, ceremony, symbols, and mammon is forbidden in the Bible for true followers of the legal and spiritual story of Jesus Christ and its guidance to be free from the influences and enslavement of the church and state.
And rest assured here that a demon (genius) needs no wings, horns, or claws as depicted in ancient artifacts. These are just frightening imagery to scare children and adults into never perceiving that ordinary men like themselves could be so evil and demonic in their genius. They live among us, controlling us, feeding off of our collective ignorance, harvesting our wealth and happiness… and they are just as human as you and me. They are as we are, simply of Adam.
ADAM – n. In Heb., Man; primarily, the name of the human species, mankind; appropriately, the first Man, the progenitor of the human race. The word signifies form, shape, or suitable form, hence, species. It is evidently connected with Heb., to be like or equal, to form an image, to assimilate. Whence the sense of likeness, image, form, shape; a body, like. [See Man.] (Webster’s 1828)
As we can read here and within the bible concordances, the word Adam is plural. It is representative of all mankind as a species. But more importantly, it represents within the Bible the “status” of mankind before being enslaved by diminishing legal statuses (names) such as “person”, “citizen”, “American”, “debtor”, or “slave”.
Yet, what does your priest sell to you every Sunday, hoping you never learn the true language of the Bible of the State of the Kings? That Adam should be anthropomorphized as a single man?
I do not claim to be a genius, and would avoid any demon that claims such notion for him or herself. For that is just a false title not of nature. I have no religion to sell, and I want none of your money or your pledged oath in exchange for this sharing of work. I give it freely in the hopes of breaking away the supposed mysteries of the Bible and revealing what it truly is to be free and to live in peace among all men under its teachings. For all men must know these words or be permanently stuck in their already existing bondage to the religion of church and State.
Ultimately, church and state are the same thing, where nowadays one is incorporated within the other, laughably calling themselves non-profits.
Perhaps non-prophets would be more like it…
In short, I want to help you to save you from your fictional self. I want you to stop taking part in your own demonic possession of an artificial person. Remember the popular axiom that possession is 9/10’s of the law? Well, this really means that the law is worthless unless you possess and appear by name as the person belonging to government – the legal fiction that the government’s fictional laws only apply to. You see, the laws of men do not apply to you, unless you claim and possess man’s fictional demon (citizen) as your person! Nine-tenth’s of man’s law, in other words, is only applicable to the government’s own property – the artificial person you possess called a citizen – creating a contractual obligation to follow the laws of man’s government over God’s. The laws of government (Satan) govern only persons (demons), not living men.
Not dis-similarly, the rules and regulations of Walmart employees only regulate the demon person created as and called the “employee” – another artificial status of person-hood. No man is bound by the rules of any corporation unless they are employed by that corporation, including all of the municipalities and offices of government (the corporation nation). If you are employed, you are possessing an additional legal fictional status added to a person called an “employee”.
POSSESSION – n. The having, holding or detention of property in one’s power or command; actual seizing or occupancy, either rightful or wrongful. One man may have the possession of a thing, and another may have the right of possession or property. In bailment, the bailee, who receives goods to convey, or to keep for a time, has the possession of the goods, and a temporary right over them, but not the property. Property in possession includes both the right and the occupation. 2. Any thing valuable possessed or enjoyed. Christian peace of mind is the best possession of life. 3. The state of being under the power of demons or invisible beings; madness; lunacy; as demoniacal possession… To take possession to enter on, or to bring within one’s power or occupancy. To give possession to put in another’s power or occupancy. (Webster’s 1828)
EMPLOYMENT – n. The act of employing or using. 1. Occupation; business; that which engages the head or hands; as agricultural employments; mechanical employments. Men, whose employment is to make sport and amusement for others, are always despised. 2. Office; public business or trust; agency or service for another or for the public. The secretary of the treasury has a laborious and responsible employment. He is in the employment of government. (Webster’s 1828)
To be employed is to be in service as a debtor and taxpayer to government. It is to be employed through mammon, using the invisible being described above as a demon that the man possess in person (in name) and is employed (used) under the power of that demonic possession. The person employed is a material possession of government…
EMPLOY – v.t. [Latin plico.] 1. To occupy the time, attention and labor of; to keep busy, or at work; to use… A portion of time should be daily employed in reading the scriptures, meditation and prayer; a great portion of life is employed to little profit or to very bad purposes. 2. To use as an instrument or means. We employ pens in writing, and arithmetic in keeping accounts. We employ medicines in curing diseases. 3. To use as materials in forming any thing. We employ timber, stones or bricks, in building; we employ wool, linen and cotton, in making cloth. 4. To engage in one’s service; to use as an agent or substitute in transacting business… 5. To occupy; to use; to apply or devote to an object; to pass in business; as, to employ time; to employ an hour, a day or a week; to employ one’s life. To employ one’s self, is to apply or devote one’s time and attention; to busy one’s self. – n. That which engages the mind, or occupies the time and labor of a person; business; object of study or industry; employment. 1. Occupation, as art, mystery, trade, profession. 2. Public office; agency; service for another. (Webster’s 1828)
ENGAGE – v.t. 1. To make liable for a debt to a creditor; to bind one’s self as surety. 2. To pawn; to stake as a pledge. 3. To enlist; to bring into a party; as, to engage men for service; to engage friends to aid in a cause. 6. To unite and bind by contract or promise. Nations engage themselves to each other by treaty. 8. To occupy; to employ assiduously. (Webster’s 1828)
As a citizen, you are employing (using) and occupying in trust the person owned by government, and are therefore agreeing to its rules (codes).
When the concept of the Mark of the Beast is considered, we must realize that it has become increasingly difficult to find “employment” without the mark of the government name, which is representative of the Social Security NUMBER of the government beast. Thus, buying and selling (commerce) are also regulated by the beast, requiring the name and number. So will you be used (employed) simply to bow down to the beast?
In a corporation, your person is the tool being employed (used) for your actual time and labor as a man (connected as surety to the person). Thus you are a human tool no less artificial (soulless; non-sentient) than a pen or a brick being used in business. A slave has no God-given (inherent) rights, not even a paid one. For an employee is always a person not a man, and a person has no unalienable rights. A corporation hires the demon (surname of the person), and you work to satisfy the obligation of the demon in contractual “employment”.
So what is your “occupation”?
If your answer is a licensed doctor, attorney, or an unlicensed busboy or garbageman, or any other one of a million legal taxpaying “occupations”, then you are using a legal title (status) of government regulated under a person with the status of “employee” of government while under its tax code, receiving a pension from government via your tax contributions to Social Security. This investment in insurance and the future receivership of benefits from that Social Security trust binds you to the federal income tax as a beneficiary of that insurance trust and its future benefit payments. That’s why they say that the income tax is voluntary, because you volunteer just by being and possessing an employed citizen instead of your self, and government’s property (the person/employee) is obligated in that debt with you as surety.
This is the price of being possessed. The demon (person) brings the man out of nature and into government’s hell on Earth.
And what is hell, really?
Are we to take the Bible literally in its allegory of a dystopian underworld where fire and brimstone burns sinners for the rest of time after they depart the Earth in physical form?
Of course not. The body remains, so what’s left to burn? The fable of hell is simply the allegory of the unnatural (legally dead) state of being a debtor, as all persons (citizens) of government are. The United States is an open air prison for debtors, and all citizens are in-deed legally classified as debtors. Sure, you must be considered legally dead to go to hell, but hell is not referencing the after-life.
You are born alive, a pure and innocent child of God, and are then immediately delivered into hell by your birth certificate – your registration as a visitor to hell on Earth – thus creating your artificial status here as a person/citizen. We are still alive within the hell on this Earth, and our possession in artificial person-hood makes us a citizen of hell. Afterlife is just a clever allegory for being set free from a life lived while imitating a fictional person, and doing so as a debtor in hell.
Hell – The name given to a place under the exchequer chamber, where the king’s debtors were confined. Rich. Diet. (Black’s 4rth Edition) (Balentines)
Hell was a dungeon for those who did not pay their debts to the government (kingdom). Today, to be under the U.S. constitution (a debt compact), as a “constitutor” (debtor), simply means to be a debtor under contractual obligation. Since all citizens are debtors, the jurisdiction of the United States in its entirety is really just one giant open-air debtors prison. In other words, Hell.
Why do I claim this to be so?
It’s simple if you understand the nature of the U.S. dollar, which is nothing more or less than “a promise to pay a debt”.
Do you actually believe that you can pay a debt with another debt (promise to pay)? If no debt can ever be paid, because there is no lawful money in existence within the debtor nation, then how can a citizen/person ever be anything else but a debtor that can never pay his or her debt?
Our particular version of a “living hell” as debtors (persons) is that hell is indeed eternal as long as we accept citizenship and are possessed of such fictional obligations (like the national debt). There is no escaping hell as long as we consent to respecting persons of any kind, including government, church, and all other corporations of any function. These are all “persons”. Our eternity on this Earth will last until we die from an accidental or natural death – a death of the flesh and blood. But these artificial persons are all created as dead financial instruments (debtors), and government remedies can only be of comfort to the dead. Government can only summon the dead (person) to court with a legal fiction summons. The hell of indebtedness is perpetual and eternal for all persons, and we cannot escape hell because there is no actual remedy or way to ever pay your national debt, since the money is already debt-based.
To have “eternal life”, as the allegory of the Bible tells us over and over, we cannot respect persons (we cannot admit of being debtors). We must always remain living men in and of nature with unalienable rights under God. We must not contract with the synagogue of Satan (man as adversary to God) to go under the Devil’s (man’s) law. This guarantees us eternal “life” on Earth, not in some incomprehensible after-life. You might call this hidden utopia a “Heaven on Earth”. Again, this is simply allegory for not accepting contracts as dead pledges and other legal personifications of our living souls into fiction characters in Satan’s (man as adversary to God) plan.
Some may think this amounts to mere anarchy, or a life without government, the meaning of that word. Most can’t imagine that instead this amounts to mere Christianity – the following of the teachings of the character Jesus Christ in self-government. But then most have thrown out the Bible without reading it with contemplation, or have read it without understanding its legal language.
“You who are on the road must have a code that you can live by… Teach your children well; their father’s hell will surely go by.” –CSNY lyrics.
To have and to hold heaven on Earth, man must have logical and reasonable rules (a code) to abide by, and must agree amongst themselves to follow those unalienable truths in nature in order to live in peace and to protect themselves, their neighbors, and the very Earth they claim as home together – heaven. This is the essence of the Bible; the essence of following the laws of nature.
How difficult would this really be to accomplish, compared to the millions of codes and statues of man that no one can ever comprehend, let alone count? Well, try this one all-encompassing law on for size…
Do no harm.
That’s it! Sweet and simple.
In fact, any law that man can create for the actual benefit of society would automatically fall under this simple Maxim. In a shocking paradox to this simple truth, most of man’s laws create the opposite – a license and permission to break God’s commandments and natural law and thus to legally harm other “persons”, which directly effects the natural man possessed of that person in surety. This is in-deed just an end run around responsibility to your fellow man for your own actions – a way to cause harm and get “off the hook” for it. And this is truly anti-Christ.
The following words are defined for the benefit of the reader who wishes to finally bring logic and reason to the rhetoric and allegory of the Bible – the officially authorized legal presentation and evidence (testament) of law, issued by King James, 1611. The following is not religion, and in point of fact is quite far from it. For the Bible is not about religion, and is in fact surprisingly shunning of such corporate things as religion and government. Religions and their proclaimed doctrines are built around and very much in spite of the Bible’s words. Religions indeed existed long before the Bible was ever written, and have created many gods and tools of control over the ages. Thus religion and the Bible are not synonymous in any way, except for the claims made by religions and governments (both are churches known as corporation sole’s) to the contrary in order to control the information we are about to uncover. Information is power. Power (authority of law) is control. And ignorance enslaves those without knowledge, causing them to “perish”.
As we delve into the true meaning of the scriptures (defined as ancient written knowledge and understanding, not necessarily of religion), we discover that quite shockingly there are no true Biblical “Christians” in America. Amazingly, the very book to prove this statement has all along been the very Bible that corporate churches twist and use to mislead good people into a state of anti-christian thought, behavior, custom, and lifestyle. It is indeed ironic that the atheist’s greatest weapon against religion turns out to be the Bible itself!!! But how do men of any religious or non-religious claim use it correctly to defeat those men who act as gods on Earth with the usurped authority of that book?
For the critic and “non-believer”, the following legal understanding of the words in that Bible is perhaps the greatest tool against organized corporate religion (and government) available, as presented in our dictionaries. For incredibly, even that word “believer” is a legal term, and means something other than what religion proclaims.
And what is more religiously doctrinal than the belief in the legitimacy of government and the patriotic indoctrination that is created from it? As it stands, the average citizen-person of the United States or any other government for that matter does the following…
They believe in government, as if it were not a work of fiction (a corporation/person).
They have faith in government, placing all love and devotion within this artificial thing.
They have trust in government; a financial bond enslaving them as surety to things unnatural.
They declare a pledge of fealty (allegiance) to government, salute its war flag, and even invoke the name of God to justify man’s authority over God (nature).
They obey the millions of commandments (legal laws) of government, which gives (issues) them license to “sin” against the laws and commandments of nature (God’s law).
They seek remedy, redemption, and salvation in government, which can only offer such things to artificial persons, not men. These are legal terms.
They pray (plead) to government in its courts, asking fictional characters to judge their actions instead of God.
They are servants (in servitude) to that government fiction, disobeying the laws of nature as a requirement of tenure.
They consider government as their master, and even bless it in prayer to God, though it was created by men.
They worship government’s paper constitution as if it were the Bible, claiming it to be inspired by God and even claiming rights from it above God, even though it is patently against everything written in the Bible.
See the similarities here? The question is, why is it so easy to believe in an absolutely known fiction called government and yet the same belief and faith in our tangible nature all around us and the laws of its “creator” are labeled as silly and fictional?
What is real, the grass that grows or the municipal corporation (city) codes that regulate its growth?
What is fiction, the legal codes of government or the omnipresence of nature all around us?
Your answer depends solely on the disposition of your soul: Are you a natural man (being human), or are you im-person-ating an artificial, fictional person like a demon?
Imagine if instead of teasing or demeaning people for having a spiritual connection to nature in the form of a belief in God as if God was the reality of nature, misguided as some may be, you teased people for believing in government instead – which by its own laws, definitions, and admission in its own courts is a complete and utter fictional story requiring consent and acceptance to its purely imaginary, contractual existence?
Ha ha ha! You believe in government? What an idiot! It doesn’t even exist in nature! Even it doesn’t believe it exists! LOL!!!
I guarantee that this is exactly what the powers that be in government and religion say behind your backs as they strip you of your life, liberty, prosperity, and happiness. Of course, they tell you that these traits are protected under the constitution even as they take them from you at will, paying you money that says “In God We Trust”. And indeed they are protected by the constitution if you are a responsible living man under God as it states, but not if you foolishly become a citizen and give up those natural unalienable rights in a permissive and obligatory contract to government to possess a subjected person (demon) of government that have no unalienable rights. In other words, men and people are not the same thing. Only men, not people, are listed as having unalienable rights. They are tricky like that…
In truth, the answer is now clear to me, though it has taken my whole life to fall upon such comprehension. It’s a simple case of mistaken identity! Men believe that they truly are the artificial person they pretend to be, which is in fact property of government. Like an actor believes he is the character he plays on the stage to improve the preformance, men forget they are natural beings, which are property of God (nature), and instead abandon the laws of nature (God) by accepting an immense legal doctrine from government – much worse than any religious one.
Government is simply a Godless religion!
Living men destroy nature (God’s kingdom) by not being in their own minds but act in that of their citizen-person, doing so without conscious as artificial representatives of their selves; as citizens. They refer to their actions as they’ve been brainwashed to do using patriotic terms like civil liberties, civil rights, liberty, and freedom (all legal privileges of persons), and they do so under the banner (flag) of their fictional master – a government that protects the actions of these demons (citizens) by granting licenses to kill, to steal, to rape, to pillage, to plunder, and to blaspheme all that is sacred in nature (under God’s dominion and law).
Blasphemy in the legal fiction is again a legal term, meaning crime against the church and state. Belief and faith in government is the belief and faith (trust) that man is god, contractually speaking. And with no higher authority, men through government may control other men in spite of God and nature, and in spite of the Bible’s teachings that this is an unnatural status that can only exist through the “respect of persons”.
Under God a man is only ever himself, and has no person to hide himself away from his responsibilities. He or she acknowledges his or her actions and takes responsibility for them as forgiveness for his sin against nature (legally known as restitution). Thus the man has no need of the laws of other men (Satan), for he belongs to God, and need not be compelled to take responsibility for harm.
Under government, as a citizen, it is quite the opposite. Man hides behind his or her artificial person, and the crimes against nature (including to other men) are “forgiven” only by government, for the fictional person belongs to the fictional government, and crime is against persons not men. Like a puppet, man inhabits the person and acts under it, taking man outside of God’s protection of true law. In other words, as a person, man must give up all rights under God (man’s unalienable inherent rights), for government law is always anti-nature (anti-God/anti-Christ) and can never be inherent, for those rights are copyrighted fictions of man, and are always artificial (opposed to nature/not inherent). Government granted rights are to persons, not men, including those “people” of the constitution. And so for a man to answer for his or her crimes, he or she must embrace this fact and stand in person (impersonation) on an actors stage called a court not as a human being, but by possessing a demon (person). This is called representation. In order to use and operate a government citizen (demon/artificial person), a man must re-present him or her self not as a human, but as that demon. The man represents and is bound in surety to the actions of the artificial person.
Representation of Persons – A fiction of the law, the effect of which is to put the representative in the place, degree, or right of the person represented. Civil Code La. art. 894. (–Black’s 1st Edition)
Represent – v. t. s as z. [Latin repraesento; re and Low Latin praesenter, from praesens, present.] – 1. To show or exhibit by resemblance. 4. To personate; to act the character or to fill the place of another in a play; as, to represent the character of king Richard. 5. To supply the place of; to act as a substitute for another. The parliament of Great Britain represents the nation. The congress of the United States represents the people or nation. The senate is considered as representing the states in their corporate capacity… 7. To stand in the place of, in the right of inheritance.
As we study the words in the Bible, we slowly comprehend that the Bible is not at all about death or about a mystical life after our physical departure from this Earth, for it was written by men who had only but lived here on Earth and could not have reasonably known God or an afterlife. Instead, the Bible is an allegorical instruction book about how to live on this earth, within the constructs of nature, without religion and without government, and yet to adhere to the laws of nature so as to preserve and live healthy lives. It is a story about living life in the fullest.
Ironically, to inhabit and impersonate an artificial person is in fact to accept death (fiction) and to oppose life (nature). There is no life or nature within legal statutes, and I’m sure I don’t have to convince anyone by now that a fictional person is not alive.
Ultimately, the Bible offers two paths, one of grace (life) in nature under God’s law and one of fiction (death) within church and state under man’s legal fiction (mammon), and it leaves that choice up to the individual.
It’s all about choice… a choice between two rulers – God (law of nature) and Satan (law of man).
Grace or disgrace.
Of course in modern times this knowledge is lost on men, and is hidden by both the church and the state’s “forced government education”, either purposefully (Vatican) or through ignorance (small local churches of any denomination).
I realize now that men have been thrown into citizenship without ever being truly provided with a consenting choice. In this way, men are created (re-presented) as gentiles (goyim), which is defined as “people” – the common mass of peasantry and lowest status of person. We are acting as the synagogue wishes us to act, in the capacity of its property through impersonation. This creates inequity on a grand scale (which we ironically call legal “equality), and confers a concentration of power unprecedented in history that milks “public” wealth to its own ends. As persons, we have no sex, no race, no specialness, no culture. We are equal in our corporate blandness and rights – a machine. This unnatural state is exactly what the Bible warns against – an army of dead persons; the dead walking the Earth. That’s us…
The Bible is an instruction book on being free in life, not death. It instructs us on being responsible for our own actions within a state of love and protection to all men with sanctity of the same rights and duty to others. It tells us how to protect nature and the laws governing our use of Earth while we are here, as well as each other. It advises us on avoiding the bondage and servitude of the corporate institutions that would otherwise use that book of God’s natural law to entrap and enfranchise the whole of mankind into bonded servitude to a small minority of men (a synagogue of Satan) against nature in the world of corporate fiction, which is often interpreted by fools to be the sole basis of the book as a justification of the evils of the church. Of course, to understand evil, one must describe it and how to avoid it.
What is evil?
EVIL – n. Evil is natural or moral. Natural evil is any thing which produces pain, distress, loss or calamity, or which in any way disturbs the peace, impairs the happiness, or destroys the perfection of natural beings. Moral evil is any deviation of a moral agent from the rules of conduct prescribed to him by God, or by legitimate human authority; or it is any violation of the plain principles of justice and rectitude. There are also evils called civil, which affect injuriously the peace or prosperity of a city or state; and political evils, which injure a nation, in its public capacity. All wickedness, all crimes, all violations of law and right are moral evils. Diseases are natural evils, but they often proceed from moral evils. 2. Misfortune; mischief; injury. There shall no evil befall thee. Psalms 91:10. A prudent man foreseeth the evil and hideth himself. Proverbs 22:3. 3. Depravity; corruption of heart, or disposition to commit wickedness; malignity.
Satan is and describes man. The concept of Satan is not some pitchforked demon as portrayed in a child’s story told to frighten the children of men til they die, in order to compel their obedience to obey church doctrine and government legality. It is not a he or a she. It is a descriptive word for the concept of influence of all men against nature (against God) and the laws of nature.
Satan – noun [Heb. an adversary.] The grand adversary of man; the devil or prince of darkness; the chief of the fallen angels.
Devil – n. Devl. [Latin , to calumniate.] 1. In the Christian theology, an evil spirit or being; a fallen angel, expelled from heaven for rebellion against God; the chief of the apostate angels; the implacable enemy and tempter of the human race. In the New Testament, the word is frequently and erroneously used for demon. 2. A very wicked person, and in ludicrous language, an great evil. In profane language, it is an expletive expressing wonder, vexation, etc. 3. An idol, or false god. Leviticus 17:7. 2 Chronicles 11:15.
As we can read, the word Satan refers to the Hebrew word for the “adversary of man”. Like the word demon, there is no supernatural quackery here. The Bible allegory uses fire and brimstone to describe men of unfettered evil genius that are adversarial to nature and life, and therefore must place other men in bondage and surety to them through the concepts of government and religion. Monsanto, Ratheon, Bank of America, the Vatican, the City of London, Washington D.C… these are the personifications of men in rebellion against God (nature); idols of false gods. Mere men. Satan incarnate.
So far, the synagogue of Satan has suppressed not only the Bible’s teachings, but also the path to abandon of all mankind from government. It has created in men a false status misleadingly called “Christianity”, that under church doctrine follow government as the “law of the land” while abusing and usurping God’s creation (nature). In truth, every action of today’s modern Christian is against the teachings of the Bible and its Christ character.
“Where there is no free agency, there can be no morality.
Where there is no temptation, there can be little claim to virtue.
Where the routine is rigorously proscribed by law,
the law, and not the man, must have the credit of the conduct.”
–William H. Prescott, “History of the Conquest of Peru,” 1847
Here are just some of the “religious” legal words that in actuality are quite opposed to religion, to government, and that are designed to make all men free in their comprehension by and through the allegory of the Bible:
–=–
The Following Are Taken From:
Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the American Language
Unless Otherwise Noted
–=–
Nickname – n. [G. To banter. Signifies to surname, to call by a name of reproach.] A name given in contempt, derision or reproach; an opprobrious appellation.- v.t. To give a name of reproach; to call by an opprobrious appellation.
Opprobrious – a. [See Opprobrium.] 1. Reproachful and contemptuous; scurrilous; as opprobrious language; opprobrious words or terms. 2. Blasted with infamy; despised; rendered hateful; as an opprobrious name.
Appellation – n. [L. appellatio. See Appeal.] Name; the word by which a thing is called and known. Spenser uses it for appeal.
Render n. 1. A surrender; a giving up. 2. A return; a payment of rent. – v. t. [This is probably the Latin reddo, with a casually inserted.] 1. To return; to pay back. See that none render evil for evil to any man. 1 Thessalonians 5:15. 6. To surrender; to yield or give up the command or possession of; as, to render one’s self to his enemies. 7. To afford; to give for use or benefit. Washington rendered great service to his country. 8. To represent; to exhibit. To render back, to return; to restore.
(Note: To render back what is Caesar’s means to stop using the government’s property, money, and person-hood (citizenship) and to give it back with no intention to ever use it again. This is often confused to mean bow down to government in that Bible verse, but is in fact the opposite. Only in rendering back the use of government property (the person/surname) to government can one be free of its implied and contractual usury, taxation, and other obligations of that government for usage of government property. The surname and social security number are examples of government property used by men against God and nature that should be “rendered back to Caesar”.)
Surname – n. [L. super and nomen.] 1. An additional name; a name or appellation added to the baptismal or christian name, and which becomes a family name. Surnames, with us, originally designated occupation, estate, place of residence, or some particular thing or event that related to the person. Thus William Rufus or red; Edmund Ironsides; Robert Smith,or the smith; William Turner. 2. An appellation added to the original name.
Christian Name – the name a person receives by baptism, as distinguished from surname.
Addition – n. [Latin additio, from addo.] 1. The act of adding, opposed to subtraction, or diminution; as, a sum is increased by addition. 2. Any thing added, whether material or immaterial. 4. In law, a title annexed to a man’s name, to show his rank, occupation or place of residence; as John Doe, Esq.; Richard Roe, Gent; Robert Dale, Mason; Thomas Way, of New York.8. In popular language, an advantage, ornament, improvement; that is, an addition by way of eminence.
Diminution – n. [Latin] 1. The act of lessening; a making smaller; opposed to augmentation; as the diminution of size, of wealth, of power, of safety. 2. The state of becoming or appearing less; opposed to increase; as the diminution of the apparent diameter of a receding body. 3. Discredit; loss of dignity; degradation. 4. Deprivation of dignity; a lessening of estimation.
(Note: A surname is an addition, meaning it is a fiction added to the given name. This combination makes the person. The addition of the surname is actually a dimunition from God’s natural law. To “appear” as less refers to standing in a courtroom, as a status in the legal society. This makes you “common” and means you are no longer under God’s jurisdiction and protection under the laws of nature (unalienable rights), for you are no longer acting as a man under God but as a fictional person owned by another. This is a step down, a loss of dignity, and degradation. Only a person can appear in court, and only as less than a man.)
Baptism, n. [Gr. to baptize.] 2. The sufferings of Christ. Matt.xx22.23.
(Note: Baptism is simply the naming process, and does not require a religion, blessed water (for all water is considered as created and therefore it is all blessed), or a priest from a corporate church, all of which are “idolatry” and ceremonial. The Bible story of true Christianity is indeed strictly against ceremony, religion, and government’s act of bestowing surnames to “persons”. No church or priest needed, only intent. Thus, the given name is said to be a gift from God through the remedy of the sufferings of Christ. See “son”.)
Name – n. That by which a thing is called. A noun. A person. Assumed character of another. Authority; behalf; part; as in the name of the people. Appearance only; sound only; not reality; as a friend in name. (Rev. 3). When a man speaks or acts in the name of another, he does it by their authority or in their behalf, as their representative. Reputation; character; that which is commonly said of a person; as a good name; a bad name. Renown; fame; honor; celebrity; eminence; praise; distinction.- v.t. To entitle.
Name – The designation of an individual person, or of a firm or corporation. In law a man cannot have more than one Christian name. 1 Ld. Baym. 562. (Black’s 1st Edition)
Noun – n. [altered from Latin name.] In grammar, a name; that sound or combination of sounds by which a thing is called, whether material or immaterial. [See name.]
(Note: The legal language is composed mostly of nouns – the names of persons, places, and things, which are all artificial “legal titles” of actual things. A name as a noun is not natural, for it is always of the hands of man. It is strictly a legal definition in acknowledgement of those persons, places, and things. However, in the legal realm the “given name” or “Christian name” (first name) is considered a gift from God (a natural and unalienable right unnameable in legal fiction) . The first name alone cannot be considered a person in law without an attached (added) surname. This is very important. All things are legally named (titled) by government (man) in the form of a noun, giving government jurisdiction over the surname or “title” of persons, places, and things. The name/noun or “title” is artificial and not of nature. It merely describes natural things in fictional terms to bring them into the realm of legalese.)
Nominative – a. Pertaining to the name which precedes a verb, or to the first case of nouns; as the nominative case or nominative word.
Misnomer – n. In law, the mistaking of the true name of a person; a misnaming…
Nomen (plural nomina) was the Roman gens (clan) name. In the typical Roman name it was preceded by the praenomen and followed by the cognomen.
Praenomen – Lat. Forename, or first name. The first of the three names by which the Romans were commonly distinguished. It marked the individual, and was commonly written with one letter; as “A.” for “Aulus;” “C.” for “Caius,” etc… (Note: By the 2nd century, praenomina were no longer commonly used.)
Cognomen – In Roman law. A man’s family name. The first name (praenomen) was the proper name of the individual; the second (nomen) indicated the gens or tribe to which he belonged; while the third (cognomen) denoted his family or house. In English law. A surname. A name added to the nomen proper, or name of the individual; a name descriptive of the family. Cognomen majorum est ex sanguine tractum, hoc intrinsecum est; agnomen extrinsecum ab eventu. The cognomen is derived from the blood of ancestors, and is intrinsic; an agnomen arises from an event, and is extrinsic. (Note: Originally cognomina were nicknames. Thus the cognomen in combination with the nomen functioned as a surname, breaking families into smaller groups than just the nomen alone.) (Black’s 1st Edition)
Agnomen – Lat. An additional name or title; a nickname. A name or title which a man gets by some action or peculiarity; the last of the four names sometimes given a Roman. Thus, Scipio Africanus, (the African,) from his African victories. (These were generally nicknames acquired at some point during the lifetime, but never given at birth.) (Black’s 1st Edition)
Agnomination – A surname; an additional name or title; agnomen. (Black’s 1st Edition)
Patronym (or patronymic) is a name derived from the name of the father or another paternal ancestor. Some surnames are patronymic in origin, like Peterson = “Peter’s son”. Some cultures, such as Iceland, use uninherited patronyms instead of surnames. (BehindTheName.com)
Acquire – v t. [Latin acquiro, ad and quaero to seek, that is to follow, to press, to urge; acquiro signifies to pursue to the end or object; Heb. to seek, to make towards, to follow. The Latin quaesivi, unless contracted, is probably from a different root. See class Gr. and Gs.] To gain, by any means, something which is in a degree permanent, or which becomes vested or inherent in the possessor; as, to acquire a title (name), estate, learning, habits, skill, dominion, etc. Plants acquire a green color from the solar rays. A mere temporary possession is not expressed by acquire but by gain, obtain, procure, as to obtain [not acquire] a book on loan. Descent is the title whereby a man, on the death of his ancestor, acquires his estate, by right of representation, as his heir at law.
Forsake – To quit or leave entirely; to desert; to abandon; to depart from. Friends and flatterers forsake us in adversity. Forsake the foolish, and live. (Prov. 9.2). To abandon; to renounce; to reject. If his children forsake my law, and walk not in my judgments – (Ps. 89). To leave; to withdraw from; to fail.
(Note: You must forsake the person to live free in abandon under God and nature. Never forget that a person is a fiction of man’s law.)
Fiction – n. [L. fictio, from fingo, to feign.] 1. The act of feigning, inventing or imagining; as, by the mere fiction of the mind. 2. That which is feigned, invented or imagined. The story is a fiction. So also was the fiction of those golden apples kept by a dragon, taken from the serpent which tempted Eve.
Remedy – n. [L. remedium; re and medeor, to heal.] 1. That which cures a disease; any medicine or application which puts an end to disease and restores health; with for; as a remedy for the gout. 2. That which counteracts an evil of any kind; with for, to or against; usually with for. Civil government is the remedy for the evils of natural liberty (and thus the opposite must be true). 3. That which cures uneasiness. 4. That which repairs loss or disaster; reparation. In the death of a man there is no remedy.
(Note: Christianity is the only remedy from man’s law. No living man can get remedy from an agency that only deals in fiction (death). Your reparation to nature and God is to counteract your demon by quitting (quitclaim) your possession of it. To quit government, you must have a higher authority than man to govern you. This is the nature of man’s law, not my opinion. And government will require proof of claim of a higher authority, which is why so many men have evidenced the Bible as their own law in court.)
Death -In theology, perpetual separation from God, and eternal torments; called the second death Revelation 2:10.
Spiritual Death – Separation or alienation of the soul from God; a being under the dominion of sin, and destitute of grace or divine life… We know that we have passed from death to life, because we love the brethren. 1 John 3:1. Luke I.
(Note: “Spiritual death” is the contractual consent to abandon God’s law and protection, denounce Jesus Christ as lawful remedy to be in lawful receivership of God’s law and protection, and give up the unalienable rights of the law of nature so that government can harm your person without recourse as it controls your surname.)
Civil Death – The separation of a man from civil society, or from the enjoyment of civil rights; as by banishment, abjuration of the realm, entering into a monastery, etc.
(Note: One must have civil death in order to only be considered a natural living being under God. This means giving up all privileges (civil rights) and obligations (duties) granted by government (for a rich man cannot enter the kingdom of heaven). Government and its courts cannot see living things, only the im-person-ation of living things as legal persons with (noun) names and surnames. In other words, the synagogue of Satan can only see demons. But without the remedy of the invocation of true Christianity (the Bible), that life would be considered by government to be non-spiritual (strictly temporal) and without a governing set of laws. In other words, government would consider you as chattel livestock with no rights either civil or natural, for no invocation of God’s law (the law of nature) was recorded. In this vein, the concept of a “free man on the land” is missing the key element of the law of God as a lawful declaration of governance. You can only serve one master, not two… but also not zero. You must choose and declare God’s law through the lawful remedy of Christ in order for government to recognize your negative rights. Remember, this is not a declaration of religion or status, but rather a notice to government that you do not recognize it as the god on Earth it pretends to be – that government is not the vicar or replacement of Christ – and that you will access your personal God as you see fit. Thus, you must acknowledge a higher authority than government, which government will only lawfully recognize as the biblical God. This is a legal process, not religion. It is the basis of law and authority, and invoking the “authorized” higher power of God is the only available recourse to get out from under government tyranny as false-god.)
Abjuration – n. [See Abjure.] 1. The act of abjuring; a renunciation upon oath; as ‘an abjuration of the realm, ‘ by which a person swears to leave the country, and never to return. It is used also for the oath of renunciation. Formerly in England, felons, taking refuge in a church, and confessing their guilt, could not be arrested and tried, but might save their lives by abjuring the realm; that is by taking an oath to quit the kingdom forever. 2. A rejection or denial with solemnity; a total abandonment; as ‘an abjuration of heresy.’
(Note: It is very important here to recognize that a country is nothing but a piece of paper, and some imaginary lines drawn on a map. You are not ever in a county, state, nation, city, town, district, or any other legal fiction because quite simply, they are fiction and you are non-fiction. You as a living being cannot be physically in a state. A state is a legal document. You must accept a fictional status to become a character in that legal fiction (jurisdiction). Thus to swear an oath to God to never return to a country simply means that you swear to God to never leave the kingdom of God in nature, never be artificial again, and that God’s law is the only law despite the claims of government. You can only be in God’s kingdom, not man’s fiction. Only a fictional person can inhabit a fictional realm. Thus the term “abjuration of the realm” literally means never respecting persons or anything man-made, for the realm is also just a fictional legal document. The term “leave the country” simply means to give up (abandon) citizenship to be governed by God (higher authority) instead of man.)
Heresy – In Scripture and primitive usage, heresy meant merely sect, party, or the doctrines of a sect, as we now use denomination or persuasion, implying no reproach. 2. heresy in law, is an offense against Christianity, consisting in a denial of some of its essential doctrines, publicly avowed and obstinately maintained. 3. An untenable or unsound opinion or doctrine in politics.
(Note: Here the reference to an “offense against Christianity” is referring to an offense against the corporate church doctrine and political laws of government, not the Bible itself. This is not true Christianity (what’s taught in the Bible), which is against religion and organized church and legal law. We know this simply because this dictionary definition says “in law” (meaning “legally speaking”), thus we know it speaks only as something artificial/fictional, as all man’s laws are, and thus can only be offended by civil law persons, not natural human beings. Thus, it is literally heresy to disagree with government’s legal law and doctrine as a person. The trick is to distinguish within the Bible when the law is of nature and God and when it is of man acting as god and vicar. Many or most of the mentions of “god” and “lord” in the Bible refer to the kings who claim to rule as God on Earth in Christ’s departure (until His return). The Bible switches between capitalized God and little god; Lord and lord.)
Save – To except, reserve, or exempt; as where a statute “saves” vested rights. To toll, or suspend the running or operation of; as to “save” the statute of limitations.
(Note: To be saved is to stop acting or “impersonating” something else that is not under God (in nature). To cease to be an artificial person is saving yourself and acting under God and nature again (becoming a “christian”). In religion, they will tell you that you can be saved and still be a citizen (fiction/person). Religion seeks to control you through fiction under the doctrine of “law of the land”. Government is religion. This doctrine is contrary to the nature of life itself (a person is not natural), thus by default is contrary to “God”. Either save yourself under God or remain a debtor person subject to man. Again, you cannot serve two masters. You must choose between God and mammon. To be “born again” is to quit using your artificial person and be reborn into this life on Earth, that’s all.)
Saver Default – L. Fr. In old English practice. To excuse a default. Termes de la Ley.
Saving the Statute of Limitations – A creditor is said to “save the statute of limitations” when he saves or preserves his debt from being barred by the operation of the statute. Thus, in the case of a simple contract debt, if a creditor commences an action for its recovery within six years from the time when the cause of action accrued, he will be in time to save the statute. Brown.
Injure – v.t. [Latin injuria, injury.] 1. To hurt or wound, as the person; to impair soundness, as of health. 2. To damage or lessen the value of, as goods or estate. 3. To slander, tarnish or impair, as reputation or character. 4. To impair or diminish; to annoy; as happiness. 5. To give pain to; to grieve; as sensibility or feelings. 7. To hurt or weaken; as, to injure a good cause. 8. To impair; to violate; as, to injure rights. 9. To make worse; as, great rains injure the roads. 10. In general, to wrong the person, to damage the property, or to lessen the happiness of ourselves or others. A man injures his person by wounds, his estate by negligence or extravagance, and his happiness by vices. He injures his neighbor by violence to his person, by fraud, by calumny, and by non-fulfillment of his contracts.
(Note: To injure (to cause injury) means to cause need for an action by or against another man or person. It literally means that you’ve done harm to another person or another against you. To injure is to bring some thing into law (jure = law). In the legal fiction world, such harms can be claimed by artificial persons where the harm is not in any way in nature and has no effect on the man claiming that person-hood. In and under God’s law, also called the “Laws of Nature”, a living man is responsible for all his or her own actions, and therefore there will never be need for injury – no need for man’s legal remedies in courts of men. Only a man that is not responsible for his own actions would need to be injured (brought into law) by man’s legal fiction. Under god, man lives by the simple credo of “do no harm”. No harm literally and consequentially translates to and presents no injury, and thus no person can be harmed under God, for a person is artificial and cannot truly be harmed in nature (reality). In this hierarchy, God is the creator and ruler of man, and under that, man is the god and ruler of persons. God creates man, and only then can man create persons (again this is not a religious view, but a legal precedent). A man of God cannot be charged with harming or injuring a person, for again the man is of God while the person is a fictional creation of man. Man is always superior to persons. Only a person can harm a person (act or crime of fiction), and only a man can harm a man (act of God). Mammon never trumps God, thus an artificial person never trumps a living man. To avoid being in-jured (brought into man’s fictional realm), we must abandon our fictional person to ensure abjuration from that realm. The legal realm can only exist within man’s realm. Without God, there be no man. Without man, there be no fiction of man. This is a legal concept, and it requires not your belief in any doctrine. Unfortunately, even if you don’t believe in it, it believes in you, for this is the maxim of law and it ultimately controls your person whether you like it or not. In legal law, a person’s reputation can be harmed, for it is artificial as is the law that protects it. In nature, a man’s reputation cannot be harmed in law, for it is real. In legality, a persons reputation is a mark or blemish (mark of the beast) and includes credit score, prison record, etc. In nature, man’s reputation is his actual actions and trustworthiness in life, not on paper. Without it, he will be shunned. Politicians and thieves thrive in the artificial world where reputation (credit score) can be fixed with money, power, and influence. In nature, there is no such system, for no man has title or status above another, and no demons are allowed or respected.)
Quit – Ad. Free; clear; discharged from; absolved 4. To quit one’s self, reciprocally, to clear one’s self of incumbent duties by full performance. 11. To forsake; to abandon. Such a superficial way of examining is to quit truth for appearance. To quit cost, to pay; to free from by an equivalent; to reimburse; as, the cultivation of barren land will not always quit cost. 9. To leave; to give up; to resign; to relinquish; as, to quit an office. 6. To vacate obligation; to release; to free from – Dangers of law, actions, decrees, judgments against us quitted. 2. To free; to clear; to liberate; to discharge from. 3. To carry through; to do or perform something to the end, so that nothing remains; to discharge or perform completely.
Quit – Clear; discharged; free; also spoken of persons absolved or acquitted of a charge. (Blacks Law 1st)
Quitclaim, v. t. [quit and claim.] To release a claim by deed without covenants of warranty; to convey to another who hath some right in lands or tenements, all one’s right, title and interest in the estate, by relinquishing all claim to them. The words used in the instrument are, ‘A hath remised, released and forever quitclaimed all his right, title and interest to a certain estate. – n. A deed of release; an instrument by which all claims to an estate are relinquished to another without any covenant or warranty, express or implied.
Quitclaim – v. In conveyancing. To release or relinquish a claim; to execute a deed of quitclaim. – n. A release or acquittance given to one man by another, in respect of any action that he has or might have against him. Also acquitting or giving up one’s claim or title. (Black’s Law 1st)
Quitclaim Deed – A deed of conveyance operating by way of release; that is, intended to pass any title, interest, or claim which the grantor may have in the premises, but not professing that such title is valid, nor containing any warranty or covenants for title. (Black’s Law 1st)
(Note: A quitclaim is a legal document, quitting or ceasing to claim possession of the person, and conveying (transferring) it back to its owner government. It is like getting out of your car and abandoning it, never to drive (use) it again. Unless you quite claiming to be a person under mammon, you can never claim to be a man under God., for you may not serve two masters. You must discharge by dismissal your connection to anything artificial that might draw you back into the realm of fiction. You must take responsibility for your self 100% of the time with no exceptions. You cannot ever officially claim the surname again.)
Conveyance – n. 1. The act of conveying; the act of bearing, carrying, or transporting, by land or water, or through any medium. 2. The act of transmitting, or transferring, as titles, estates or claims from one person to another; transmission; transference; assignment. 3. The instrument or means of passing a thing from place to place, or person to person; as, a vehicle is a conveyance for persons or goods; a canal or aqueduct is a conveyance for water; a deed is a conveyance of land. 4. Removal; the act of removing or carrying. 5. Management; artifice; secret practices.
Discharge – n. 4. Dismission from office or service; or the writing which evidences the dismission. The general, the soldier, obtains a discharge. 5. Release from obligation, debt or penalty; or the writing which is evidence of it; an acquittance; as, the debtor has a discharge. 6. Absolution from a crime or accusation; acquittance. 7. Ransom; liberation; price paid for deliverance. 8. Performance; execution; applied to an office, trust or duty. A good man is faithful in the discharge of his duties, public and private. 9. Liberation; release from imprisonment or other confinement. 10. Exemption; escape. 11. Payment, as of a debt.
Acquittance – n. 1. A discharge or release from a debt. 2. The writing, which is evidence of a discharge; a receipt in full, which bars a further demand.
Deliverance – n. 1. Release from captivity, slavery, oppression, or any restraint. He hath sent me to heal the broken-hearted, to preach deliverance to the captives. Luke 4:18. 2. Rescue from danger or any evil. God sent me to save your lives by a great deliverance Genesis 45:7. 3. The act of bringing forth children. 4. The act of giving or transferring from one to another. 5. The act of speaking or pronouncing; utterance. [In the three last senses, delivery is now used.] 6. Acquittal of a prisoner, by the verdict of a jury. God send you a good deliverance.
Salvation – n. [Latin salvo, to save.] 1. The act of saving; preservation from destruction, danger or great calamity. 2. Appropriately in theology, the redemption of man from the bondage of sin and liability to eternal death, and the conferring on him everlasting happiness. This is the great salvation. 3. Deliverance from enemies; victory. Exodus 14:13. 4. Remission of sins, or saving graces. Luke 19:9.
(Note: Eternal death refers again to acting in dead pledge as a person, in bondage and liability/debt to the government. To live your life as something artificial is to live your life as a dead person. The legal redemption of your soul from this captivity is what the allegory of the Bible speaks about.)
Redemption – n. [Latin redemptio. See Redeem.] 1. Repurchase of captured goods or prisoners; the act of procuring the deliverance of persons or things from the possession and power of captors by the payment of an equivalent; ransom; release; as the redemption of prisoners taken in war; the redemption of a ship and cargo. 2. Deliverance from bondage, distress, or from liability to any evil or forfeiture, either by money, labor or other means. 3. Repurchase, as of lands alienated. Leviticus 25:24. Jeremiah 32:7. 4. The liberation of an estate from a mortgage; or the purchase of the right to re-enter upon it by paying the principal sum for which it was mortgaged with interest and cost; also, the right of redeeming and re-entering.6. In theology, the purchase of God’s favor by the death and sufferings of Christ; the ransom or deliverance of sinners from the bondage of sin and the penalties of God’s violated law by the atonement of Christ. In whom we have redemption through his blood. Ephesians 1:7. Colossians 1:14.
Distress – n. [See Stress.] 1. The act of distraining; the taking of any personal chattel from a wrong-doer, to answer a demand, or procure satisfaction for a wrong committed. 2. The thing taken by distraining; that which is seized to procure satisfaction. 4. Affliction; calamity; misery. On earth distress of nations. Luke 21:23. – v.t. 1. To pain; to afflict with pain or anguish; applied to the body or the mind. [Literally, to press or strain.] 2. To afflict greatly; to harass; to oppress with calamity; to make miserable.
Distrain – v.t. [Latin Dis and stringo. See Strain. Blackstone writes distrein.] 1. To seize for debt; to take a personal chatel from the possession of a wrong-doer into the possession of the injured party, to satisfy a demand, or compel the performance of a duty; as, to distrain goods fro rent, or for an amercement. 2. To rend; to tear. – v.i. To make seizure of goods. For neglecting to do suit to the lords court, or other personal service, the lord may distrain of common right.
(Note: In all cases, the property of a person (citizen) and resident is the property of the State, for the person is also property of the State. A person can only be a tenant of State property, and so government will put a person in distress to take (distrain) that property on behalf of itself or for corporations (banks) that foreclose in its name and protection when the person does not pay his or her debts. This action of demand could not be done on living man with claimed higher authority (God), for man is above (god of) that fiction. A distress against a living man is not lawful, while a distress against an artificial person is no crime, for a person is not alive.)
Mortgage – n.. 1. Literally, a dead pledge; the grant of an estate in fee as security for the payment of money, and on the condition that if the money shall be paid according to the contract, the grant shall be void, and the mortgagee shall re-convey the estate to the mortgager… 2. The state of being pledged; as lands given in mortgage. 3. A pledge of goods or chattels by a debtor to a creditor, as security for the debt. v. t. 1. To pledge; to make liable to the payment of any debt or expenditure.
Mortmain – n.In law, possession of lands or tenements in dead hands, or hands that cannot alienate. Alienation in mortmain is an alienation of lands or tenements to any corporation, sole or aggregate, ecclesiastical or temporal, particularly to religious houses, by which the estate becomes perpetually inherent in the corporation and unalienable.
(Note: Dead, dead, dead. That’s what a person is. Thus a mortgage is a pledge by a dead person, which can only hold that property with (imaginary) dead hands. And a person cannot alienate, therefore a person cannot stop government (corporation) from taking. The word “fee” is equal to the word feudal or fief. It’s time you realize that you live in a modernized feudal state that has been around since before the Bible was written – an ancient system of pledging now streamlined and computerized.)
Alienable – a. That may be sold, or transferred to another; as, land is alienable according to the laws of the State.
Unalienable – a. Not alienable; that cannot be alienated; that may not be transferred; as unalienable rights.
Inalienable – a. [Latin alieno, alienus.] Unalienable; that cannot be legally or justly alienated or transferred to another. The dominions of a king are inalienable. All men have certain natural rights which are inalienable. The estate of a minor is inalienable without a reservation of the right of redemption, or the authority of the legislature.
(Note: Inalienable is the legal version of unalienable, but legal rights (privileges) can be taken or given away within an inalienable state, where natural (unalienable rights) cannot. Remember, nothing Government grants to persons (rights/benefits) are unalienable. Thus, while in the United States jurisdiction, property is always inalienable (alienable only by legal means), and thus legally property and land can be taken under eminent domain because the property does not belong to a man, but to a government created corporation or person. When property of any kind is registered under a surname, that property and land becomes government owned, where the person can only be a tenant (user). An artificial fictional thing (citizen) cannot own anything in nature, thus men as persons (demons) have no real property rights in the United States. All rights of persons are in fact ultimately artificial, and thus are ultimately always considered legally alienable under the doctrine of necessity.)
Pray – n. 2. To petition; to ask, as for a favor; as in application to a legislative body.
Prayer – The request contained in a bill in equity that the court will grant the process, aid, or relief which the complainant desires. Also, by extension, the term is applied to that part of the bill which contains this request. (Black’s Law 1st)
Prayer of Process – is a petition with which a bill in equity used to conclude, to the effect that a writ of subpoena might issue against the defendant to compel him to answer upon oath all the matters charged against him in the bill. (Black’s Law 1st)
(Note: The word pray was used in court until recently instead of the word plead. When one falls on ones knees and makes a pleading to the lord of the courtroom (the judge) for a lenient judgement, this was called praying to the court (lord).)
Atonement – n. 1. Agreement; concord; reconciliation, after enmity or controversy. Romans 5:11. 2. Expiation; satisfaction or reparation made by giving an equivalent for an injury, or by doing or suffering that which is received in satisfaction for an offense or injury; with for. When a man has been guilty of any vice, the best atonement he can make for it is, to warn others not to fall into the like. 3. In theology, the expiation of sin made by the obedience and personal sufferings of Christ.
Expiation n. [Latin expiatio.] The act of atoning for a crime; the act of making satisfaction for an offense, by which the guilt is done away, and the obligation of the offended person to punish the crime is canceled; atonement; satisfaction. Among pagans and Jews, expiation was made chiefly by sacrifices, or washings and purification. Among Christians, expiation for the sins of men is usually considered as made only by the obedience and sufferings of Christ. 1. The means by which atonement for crimes is made; atonement; as sacrifices and purification among heathens, and the obedience and death of Christ among Christians.
(Note: Accepting and declaring the grace of God is the legal remedy for atonement of the sins of the person. A man can have no obligations to the State unless he continues to claim and stand in his or her artificial person. Did I mention this is not religion?)
Grace – n. [Latin gratia, which is formed on the Celtic; Eng. agree, congruous, and ready. The primary sense of gratus, is free, ready, quick, willing, prompt, from advancing.] 1. Favor; good will; kindness; disposition to oblige another; as a grant made as an act of grace 2. Appropriately, the free unmerited love and favor of God, the spring and source of all the benefits men receive from him. And if by grace then it is no more of works. Romans 11:5. 3. Favorable influence of God; divine influence or the influence of the spirit, in renewing the heart and restraining from sin. My grace is sufficient for thee. 2 Corinthians 12:9. 4. The application of Christ’s righteousness to the sinner. Where sin abounded, grace did much more abound. Romans 5:2. 5. A state of reconciliation to God. Romans 5:2:2. 9. Eternal life; final salvation. 1 Peter 1:13. 10. Favor; mercy; pardon. Bow and sue for grace With suppliant knee. 11. Favor conferred. 12. Privilege. 14. Natural or acquired excellence; any endowment that recommends the possessor to others; as the graces of wit and learning. 18. The title of a duke or an archbishop, and formerly of the king of England, meaning your goodness or clemency. His grace the Duke of York. Your grace will please to accept my thanks. 19. A short prayer before or after meat; a blessing asked, or thanks rendered.Day in grace in theology, time of probation, when an offer is made to sinners. Days in grace in commerce, the days immediately following the day when a bill or note becomes due, which days are allowed to the debtor or payor to make payment in. In Great Britain and the United States the days of grace are three, but in other countries more; the usages of merchants being different. –v.t. To adorn; to decorate; to embellish and dignify. 1. To dignify or raise by act of favor; to honor. He might at his pleasure grace or disgrace whom he would in court. 3. To supply with heavenly grace.
Disgrace – n. [dis and grace.] 1. A state of being out of favor; disfavor; disesteem; as, the minister retired from court in disgrace 2. State of ignominy; dishonor; shame. 3. Cause of shame; as, to turn the back to the enemy is a foul disgrace; every vice is a disgrace to a rational being.
(Note: This again leaves us with a choice: Do you prefer the grace of God in nature or the disgrace of a man in demonic robe and status who claims to be god on Earth? Who or what do you want to be the judge of your actions? To what do you wish to be responsible to, God and nature or to men who claim to be of higher authority than God? Hint: only a psychopath claims to be a god or act criminally against nature in God’s name… A man supplied with “Heavenly Grace” needs not pretend grace (shame) and lives life eternally here on Earth. A man without God’s grace in legal form must suffer man’s shame, judgement, and wrath in hell on earth as an eternal debt-slave.)
Enmity – n. 1. The quality of being an enemy; the opposite of friendship; ill will; hatred; unfriendly dispositions; malevolence. It expresses more than aversion and less than malice, and differs from displeasure in denoting a fixed or rooted hatred, whereas displeasure is more transient. I will put enmity between thee and the woman. Genesis 3:15. The carnal mind is enmity against God.Romans 8:7. 2. A state of opposition. The friendship of the world is enmity with God. James 4:4.
(Note: Friendship of the world refers to accepting dead/artificial things as persons created by men to have authority over nature and God. It is also referred to in the Bible as the “respecting of persons”. A person is an enemy (in enmity) of God, by simply being opposed to (not created by) nature and its laws.)
Son – n. 2. A male descendant, however distant; hence in the plural, sons signifies descendants in general, a sense much used in the Scriptures. The whole human race are styled sons of Adam. 4. A native or inhabitant of a country; as the sons of Britain. Let our country never be ashamed of her sons. 5. The produce of any thing. Earth’s tall sons, the cedar, oak and pine. [Note. The primary sense of child is produce, issue; a shoot.] 6. One adopted into a family. Moses was the son of Pharaoh’s daughter. Exodus 2:2. 7. One who is converted by another’s instrumentality, is called his son; also, one educated by another; as the sons of the prophets. 8. Christ is called the son of God, as being conceived by the power of the Holy Spirit, or in consequence of his relation to the Father.
(Note: To be a son of God is to be an instrument of God. Instrument is a legal term. You are born a man (son of God) and then converted into a financial instrument through the attaching of a surname on a birth certificate into an artificial state of being a person. To find grace and salvation (remedy) to that artificial state in law, it requires you to to be re-converted back into nature – thus we say a person must abandon his person by “converting to Christianity”.)
GOD – n. 1. The Supreme Being; Jehovah; the eternal and infinite spirit, the creator, and the sovereign of the universe. GOD is a spirit; and they that worship him, must worship him in spirit and in truth. John 4:24. 2. A false god; a heathen deity;an idol. Fear not the gods of the Amorites. Judges 6:10. 3. A prince; a ruler; a magistrate or judge; an angel. Thou shalt not revile the gods, nor curse the ruler of thy people. Exodus 22:28. Psalms 97:7. 4. Any person or thing exalted too much in estimation, or deified and honored as the chief good. Whose god is their belly. Philippians 3:19.
(Note: Do not honor or respect persons as gods. The majority of the mention of the word “god”, “gods”, and “lord” in the Bible is referring to persons (Kings and Priests as vicars), not to GOD (Supreme Being/Creator). This must be understood to comprehend how and why the Bible tells two stories (God and false “temporal” god) and describes two paths, one of God and one of mammon. For instance it was the King’s (god’s) will that blood sacrifices be made to God, not GOD/creators will. Nature requires no such idolatry and no ceremony under the path of Christianity, for the sacrifice/crucifixion was already allegorically made in order to satisfy the law of men acting as gods who demanded sacrifices of blood. Again, literal or fundamental translation to this story will get you nowhere in life, and will continue to hide the allegorical brilliance of the Bible as a remedy to man’s claim of being authority over God and other men. You do not need to prove that Plato’s Cave actually existed in his Allegory of the Cave to be able to apply it’s lessons in real life. Robin Hood and King Arthur need not be anything but fictional characters and yet still their stories teach men. Why then cannot one learn from and utilize the Bible without the need for proof of its allegory?)
Mammon – n. Riches; wealth; or the god or riches. Ye cannot serve God and mammon. Matthew 6:24.
(Note: In this definition the distinction is made between God capitalized and god un-capitalized. Little god is man acting in the stead of God, claiming to be god, which is also known as idolatry. The god of riches is government and corporate church of course, for it creates money and is mammon.)
Vicar – n. [Latin vicarius, from vicis, a turn, or its root.] 1. In a general sense, a person deputed or authorized to perform the functions of another; a substitute in office. The pope pretends to be vicar of Jesus Christ on earth. He has under him a grand vicar who is a cardinal, and whose jurisdiction extends over all priests, regular and secular. 2. In the canon law, the priest of a parish, the predial tithes of which are impropriated or appropriated, that is, belong to a chapter or religious house, or to a layman, who receives them, and only allows the vicar the smaller tithes or a salary. Apostolical vicars, are those who perform the functions of the pope in churches or provinces committed to their direction.
Authorized – participle passive, Warranted by right; supported by authority; derived from legal or proper authority; having power or authority.
(Note: By having the title of “Authorized Version”, the 1611 King James Bible is literally the “legal authority” of the legal law of men (mammon). We don’t read the King James because it is a “good translation” or more easily understandable, but rather because it is the book that the current legal law is based upon. Other translations are irrelevant for legal purposes. You must not look for an easy to read translation, for that will be a work of mere fiction, and we are reading the Bible to find the legal remedy to invoke Christ as remedy. You must learn the language of the authorized version so as to understand what authority is – which is the legal language of the vicar of Christ. Remember, this translation is of the King (god), of the government (god), and is the evidence (testament) of law that all right and authority is claimed by the “vicar”. In God We Trust…)
Idolatry – n. [Latin idololatria. Gr. idol, and to worship or serve.] 1. The worship of idols, images, or any thing made by hands (of man/unnatural), or which is not God (of and found in nature). Idolatry is of two kinds; the worship of images, statues, pictures, etc. made by hands; and the worship of the heavenly bodies, the sun, moon and stars, or of demons, angels, men and animals. 2. Excessive attachment or veneration for any thing, or that which borders on adoration.
(Note: There is no image of God, for man cannot perceive God. Look around you and worship the creation of God, for that is the closest you will ever get to perceiving God. And more importantly, worship all men (respect their rights) who are Sons of God (I AM) in total equality, so that no man may ever have an artificial status (person) above any other. This is called peace.)
Peace – n.[Latin pax, paco, to appease.] 1. In a general sense, a state of quiet or tranquillity; freedom from disturbance or agitation; applicable to society, to individuals, or to the temper of the mind. 2. Freedom from war with a foreign nation; public quiet. 3. Freedom from internal commotion or civil war. 4. Freedom from private quarrels, suits or disturbance. 5. Freedom from agitation or disturbance by the passions, as from fear, terror, anger, anxiety or the like; quietness of mind; tranquillity; calmness; quiet of conscience. Great peace have they that love the (natural) law. Psalms 119:165. 7. Harmony; concord; a state of reconciliation between parties at variance. 8. Public tranquillity; that quiet, order and security which is guaranteed by the laws; as, to keep the peace; to break the peace. This word is used in commanding silence or quiet; as, peace to this troubled soul. To be at peace to be reconciled; to live in harmony. To make peace to reconcile, as parties at variance. To hold the peace to be silent; to suppress one’s thoughts; not to speak.
Reconciliation – noun [Latin reconciliatio.] 1. The act of reconciling parties at variance; renewal of friendship after disagreement or enmity. Reconciliation and friendship with God, really form the basis of all rational and true enjoyment. 2. In Scripture, the means by which sinners are reconciled and brought into a state of favor with God, after natural estrangement or enmity; the atonement; expiation. Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression and to make an end of sin, and to make reconciliation for iniquity. Daniel 9:24. Hebrews 2:17. 3. Agreement of things seemingly opposite, different or inconsistent.
(Note: A man cannot reconcile with government his desire to be free of its person without making atonement to nature and thus showing favor of God as highest authority to government. You will be governed by men until you can prove and legally declare a higher God, and thus live in peace, for the meek shall inherit the world.)
Converted – p.p. Turned or changed from one substance or state to another; turned form one religion or sect to another; changed from a state of sin to a state of holiness; applied to a particular use; appropriated.
Meek, a [Latin mucus; Eng. mucilage; Heb. to melt.] 1. Mild of temper; soft; gentle; not easily provoked or irritated; yielding; given to forbearance under injuries. Now the man Moses was very meek above all men. Numbers 12:3. 2. Appropriately, humble, in an evangelical sense; submissive to the divine will; not proud, self-sufficient or refractory; not peevish and apt to complain of divine dispensations. Christ says, ‘Learn of me, for I am meek and lowly in heart, and ye shall find rest to your souls.’ Matthew 11:29. Blessed are the meek for they shall inherit the earth. Matthew 5:5.
(Note: Persons may not inherit the Earth, for they are not natural as the Earth is. Only men who are meek, self-sufficient without government, and who pay for injuries caused to other natural things and beings as responsible for their own actions shall be allowed by governments to inherit the Earth without being governed by men.)
Inherit – v. t. [Latin hoeres, an heir. See Heir.] 1. To take by descent from an ancestor; to take by succession, as the representative of the former possessor; to receive, as a right or title descendible by law from an ancestor at his decease. The heir inherits the lands or real estate of his father; the eldest son of the nobleman inherits his father’s title, and the eldest son of a king inherits the crown. 2. To receive by nature from a progenitor. The son inherits the virtues of his father; the daughter inherits the temper of her mother, and children often inherit the constitutional infirmities of their parents. 3. To possess; to enjoy; to take as a possession, by gift or divine appropriation; as, to inherit everlasting life; to inherit the promises. –That thou mayest live, and inherit the land which Jehovah thy God giveth thee. Deuteronomy 16:20. The meek shall inherit the earth. Matthew 5:5.
(Note: Maturity of thought creates the realization that no man may own the property (creation) of God. The creator of the Earth (a higher law) was the first progenitor, and only the men who are Sons of God may inherit that land – with merely the responsibility to keep and protect it as caretaker (dominion) but never to claim demonic possession of it through fictional title of property (corporate person). Persons being not of God, can only thus inherit a fictional paper title also not of God, which is unnatural and not the soil of the land itself (of the creator). The meek shall inherit the whole Earth, not incorporated plots (parts) of it. If this sounds like an impossible disposition for men, which is perfectly understandable considering today’s society, we must remember the most important rule of Christianity – DO NO HARM. To do no harm means also to respect the duty to never harm natural rights of all other men. Peace may never be on Earth (in heaven) without this duty being always upheld. I, for one, am not confident this pipe-dream can ever become reality among men, I am only deciphering the code so that if it is possible, men of God may have a fighting chance at peace and harmony – at heaven on Earth. I do claim to know that the way things are today requires war, occupation, and crimes against nature, and thus will never end in peace and quiet, for it is literally hell on Earth.)
Quiet – a. Unmolested ; tranquil; free from interference or disturbance. – v. To pacify; to render secure or unassailable by the removal of disquieting causes or disputes. This is the meaning of the word in the phrase “action to quiet title”, which is a proceeding to establish the plaintiff’s title to land by bringing into court an adverse claimant and there compelling QUIET.
Quiet Title – a suit brought about to obtain a determination as to the title of a certain piece of property.
Title Quiet – used to describe a suit in a court of equity that will settle all claims of rightful ownership.
Peace and Quiet – a term referring to a right to security, freedom and tranquility as is guaranteed by the law.
(Note: Only the quieting of persons and destruction of titles (status) can peace happen. Peace and legal quiet go hand in hand.)
Attachment n.1. A taking of the person, goods or estate by a writ or precept in a civil action, to secure a debt or demand. 2. A writ directing the person or estate of a person to be taken, to secure his appearance before a court. 3. Close adherence or affection; fidelity; regard; any passion or affection that binds a person; as, an attachment to a friend, or to a party.
Fidelity – n. [Latin fidelitas, from fides, faith, fido, to trust. See Faith.] 1. Faithfulness; careful and exact observance of duty, or performance of obligations. We expect fidelity in a public minister, in an agent or trustee, in a domestic servant, in a friend. The best security for the fidelity of men, is to make interest coincide with duty. 2. Firm adherence to a person or party with which one is united, or to which one is bound; loyalty; as the fidelity of subjects to their king or government; the fidelity of a tenant or liege to his lord. 3. Observance of the marriage covenant; as the fidelity of a husband or wife. 4. Honesty; veracity; adherence to truth; as the fidelity of a witness.
Faith. 1. Confidence; credit; reliance. Thus, an act may be said to be done “on the faith” of certain representations. 2. Belief; credence; trust. Thus, the constitution provides that “full faith and credit” shall be given to the judgments of each state in the courts of the others. 3. Purpose; intent; sincerity; state of knowledge or design. This is the meaning of the word in the phrases “good faith” and “bad faith.” (Black’s Law 1st)
(Note: In government, a person is under an agreement of faith as a financial instrument, which has nothing to do with a belief in God. It is a bond of insurance or pledge to church and government, not God.)
Faith – n. [Latin fides, fido, to trust; Gr. to persuade, to draw towards any thing, to conciliate; to believe, to obey. In the Greek Lexicon of Hederic it is said, the primitive signification of the verb is to bind and draw or lead, as signifies a rope or cable. But this remark is a little incorrect. The sense of the verb, from which that of rope and binding is derived, is to strain, to draw, and thus to bind or make fast. A rope or cable is that which makes fast. Heb.] 1. Belief; the assent of the mind to the truth of what is declared by another, resting on his authority and veracity, without other evidence; the judgment that what another states or testifies is the truth… 2. The assent of the mind to the truth of a proposition advanced by another; belief, or probable evidence of any kind. 3. In theology, the assent of the mind or understanding to the truth of what God has revealed. Simple belief of the scriptures, of the being and perfections of God, and of the existence, character and doctrines of Christ, founded on the testimony of the sacred writers, is called historical or speculative faith; a faith little distinguished from the belief of the existence and achievements of Alexander or of Cesar. 4. Evangelical, justifying, or saving faith is the assent of the mind to the truth of divine revelation, on the authority of God’s testimony, accompanied with a cordial assent of the will or approbation of the heart; an entire confidence or trust in God’s character and declarations, and in the character and doctrines of Christ, with an unreserved surrender of the will to his guidance, and dependence on his merits for salvation. In other words, that firm belief of God’s testimony, and of the truth of the gospel, which influences the will, and leads to an entire reliance on Christ for salvation. Being justified by faith Romans 5:1. Without faith it is impossible to please God. Hebrews 11:1. For we walk by faith and not by sight. 2 Corinthians 5:7. The faith of the gospel is that emotion of the mind, which is called trust or confidence, exercised towards the moral character of God, and particularly of the Savior. Faith is an affectionate practical confidence in the testimony of God. Faith is a firm, cordial belief in the veracity of God, in all the declarations of his word; or a full and affectionate confidence in the certainty of those things which God has declared, and because he has declared them. 5. The object of belief; a doctrine or system of doctrines believed; a system of revealed truths received by christians. 7. An open profession of gospel truth. 8. A persuasion or belief of the lawfulness of things indifferent. Hast thou faith? Have it to thyself before God. Rom 14. 9. Faithfulness; fidelity; a strict adherence to duty and fulfillment of promises. 10. Word or honor pledged; promise given; fidelity. 11. Sincerity; honesty; veracity; faithfulness. We ought in good faith to fulfill all our engagements. 12. Credibility or truth.
(Note: Whatever your claim of religion as a person, you automatically have faith in government as a person over God. Putting your faith in God simply means placing your whole self into the realm of nature under that law instead of man’s. You are putting faith in the teachings of the Bible through the “character” of Christ, not in the notion that Christ lived or did not live. Logic and reason must prevail here, or religion will form from even your own self-created doctrine. Plato’s Cave and the characters called slaves need not be proven to have lived in reality for the faith in its veracity of knowledge to be true. Do not allow religious thought to cloud your judgement or to demonize the Bible as just religion. You believe, put faith in, and obey the U.S. CODE, knowing it is merely the fiction of men. Why can you not therefore believe, put faith in, and obey the words of the Christ character to escape that U.S. CODE and be free?)
Respect, v. t. [Latin respecto, or respectus, from respicio; re and specio, to view.] 1. To regard; to have regard to in design or purpose. 2. To have regard to, in relation or connection; to relate to. The treaty particularly respects our commerce. 3. To view or consider with some degree of reverence; to esteem as if possessed of real worth… To respect the person, to suffer the opinion or judgment, to be influenced or biased by a regard to the outward circumstances of a person, to the prejudice of right and equity. Thou shalt not respect the person of the poor. Leviticus 19:15. Neither doth God (nature) respect any person (artificial thing). 2 Samuel 14:14. – n. [Latin respectus.] 5. Partial regard; undue bias to the prejudice of justice; as the phrase, respect of persons. 1 Peter 1:17. James 2:1. Proverbs 24:23. 6. Respected character; as persons of the best respect in Rome. 7. Consideration; motive in reference to something.
Character/Characteristic – a. That constitutes the character; that marks the peculiar, distinctive qualities of a person or thing. – n. 1. That which constitutes a character; that which characterizes; that which distinguishes a person or thing from another.
(Note: The character of persons is distinguished by the name and surname, and by the number assigned to that unnatural combination. You might call the Social Security number the number and mark of the Beast. A man with no surname or number is indistinguishable in mans’ law, for he has no prescribed legal character and no corporate or artificial characteristics.)
Person, noun per’sn. [Latin persona; said to be compounded of per, through or by, and sonus, sound; a Latin word signifying primarily a mask used by actors on the state.] 1. An individual human being consisting of body and soul. We apply the word to living beings only, possessed of a rational nature; the body when dead is not called a person. It is applied alike to a man, woman or child. A person is a thinking intelligent being. 2. A man, woman or child, considered as opposed to things, or distinct from them. 3. A human being, considered with respect to the living body or corporeal existence only. The form of her person is elegant. 4. A human being, indefinitely; one; a man. Let a person’s attainments be never so great, he should remember he is frail and imperfect. 5. A human being represented in dialogue, fiction, or on the state; character. A player appears in the person of king Lear. 6. Character of office. How different is the same man from himself, as he sustains the person of a magistrate and that of a friend. 7. In grammar, the nominative to a verb; the agent that performs or the patient that suffers any thing affirmed by a verb… 8. In law, an artificial person is a corporation or body politic. In person by one’s self; with bodily presence; not be representative. The king in person visits all around. – v. t. To represent as a person; to make to resemble; to image.
(Note: The word person takes up many pages in law to describe. It can be used in nature and in fiction. But be clear that always in law and legal settings, a person is but a legal fiction and artificial. Thus, when speaking of man’s law, it can only recognize men if the respect the person assigned to them by government. The legal realm only deals with men when they possess a demon in impersonation of that fictional character. God protects men under the laws of nature only if they are not in possession and surety of a demon.)
Impersonate – v. t. To personify.
Personify – v. t. [Latin persona and facio.] To give animation to inanimate objects; to ascribe to an inanimate being the sentiments, actions or language of a rational being or person, or to represent an inanimate being with the affections and actions of a person. Thus we say, the plants thirst for rain. The trees said to the fig-tree, come thou, and reign over us. Judges 9:1.
Ascribe, v. t. [Latin ascribo, of ad and scribo, to write.] 1. To attribute, impute, or set to, as to a cause; to assign, as effect to a cause; as, losses are often to be ascribed to imprudence. 2. To attribute, as a quality, or an appurtenance; to consider or allege to belong; as, to ascribe perfection to God, or imperfection to man. Job 36:3. Psalms 68:34. 1 Samuel 18:8.
Attribute – v.t. [Latin attribuo; ad and tribuo, to divide, to bestow, to assign; tribus, a tribe, division or ward. See Tribe.] 1. To allot or attach, in contemplation; to ascribe; to consider as belonging. We attribute nothing to God, that contains a contradiction. 2. To give as due; to yield as an act of the mind; as, to attribute to God all the glory of redemption. 3. To impute, as to a cause; as, our misfortunes are generally to be attributed to our follies or imprudence. – n. 1. That which is attributed; that which is considered as belonging to, or inherent in; as, power and wisdom are attributes of the Supreme Being; or a quality determining something to be after a certain manner; as, extension is an attribute of body. 2. Quality; characteristic disposition; as bravery and generosity in men. 3. A thing belonging to another; an appendant; as the arms of a warrior. In painting and sculpture, a symbol of office or character, added to the principal figure; as a club is the attribute of Hercules. 4. Reputation; honor.
(Note: An artificial person is an attribute of government granted to a man. It is a title. The person does not belong to you, and therefore every action taken in person and everything purchased in person and everything accomplished in life in person belongs to the owner of that person, which is government. Thus everything you have in person can be taken by government, from property to freedom. Remember, a person has no unalienable rights in nature, for a person is not of nature; not created by God and not under God’s authority and jurisdiction. All conglomerate corporations for profit or not are also property of government, as they are property of a person, not a man. The man incorporates in person, thus the corporation is fiction of government and thus government acts as god over that corporation (person).)
Appurtenance – n. So written for appurtenance. See Appertain.] That which belongs to something else; an adjunct; an appendage. Appropriately, such buildings, rights and improvements, as belong to land, are called the appurtenances; as small buildings are the appurtenances of a mansion.
Adjunct – n. [Latin adjunctus, joined, from adjungo. See join.] 1. Something added to another, but not essentially a part of it; as, water absorbed by a cloth or sponge is its adjunct. Also a person joined to another. – a. Added to or united with, as an adjunct professor.
(Note: A man is joined under legal law to a person through what is known as a surety. It is the goal of a man in becoming a “Christian” to abandon such an artificial joinder and to instead be a surety to Christ, being then bound by the laws of nature (God).)
Surety, n. Certainty; indubitableness. Know of a surety that thy seed shall be a stranger in a land that is not theirs Genesis 15:13. 1. Security; safety. 2. Foundation of stability; support. 3. Evidence; ratification; confirmation. 4. Security against loss or damage; security for payment. 5. In law, one that is bound with and for another; one who enters into a bond or recognizance to answer for another’s appearance in court, or for his payment of a debt or for the performance of some act, and who, in case of the principal debtor’s failure, is compellable to pay the debt or damages; a bondsman; a bail. He that is surety for a stranger, shall smart for it. Proverbs 11:15. 6. In Scripture, Christ is called ‘the surety of a better testament.’ Hebrews 7:22. He undertook to make atonement for the sins of men, and thus prepare the way to deliver them from the punishment to which they had rendered themselves liable. 7. A hostage.
(Note: One of the most important legal terms in both realms, a surety-ship is comparable to the shackles of a slave. Being attached through surety to an artificial person is like carrying around a ventriloquist’s doll, where the doll pulls your strings and speaks for you in law. The purpose of the action of surety is literally the bondage of man to a person. It is an insurance policy insuring that government’s property (the person) is not damaged, and creating a pact that the man shall pay the debts of the person. The remedy to this enslavement through bonded indebtedness to government is the act of abandoning the usage of that person and literally becoming a slave to the will and testament of God, through the legal concept of Christ Jesus. Faith and belief are thus removed from government and placed in God, and man is now bonded with Christ in redemption, no longer a slave in the legal fiction realm, abjuring to the laws of nature as his or her only true jurisdiction in law. This is an actual legal process, not to be mistaken with mere religions thought or doctrine. It involves all of the legal concepts discussed here, correctly applied within the authorized legal testament (evidence) of law of kings. In other words, this is the only authorized remedy by kings and governments, for only the usurpation of their claimed authority as vicar (replacement) of God on temporal/corporal Earth can legally be considered and recognized by that authority of man as remedy to that legal claim.)
Believer – n. One who believes; one who gives credit to other evidence than that of personal knowledge. 1. In theology, one who gives credit to the truth of the scriptures, as a revelation from God. In a more restricted sense, a professor of christianity; one who receives the gospel, as unfolding the true way of salvation, and Christ, as his Savior.
(Note: This word believer is very important. No other word creates more tension than this one by religious persons among non-religious men. But please understand that belief in anything is not a requirement in a religious or doctrinal way. Instead, this word legally signifies “use” with “confidence” as evidence of law under God and not man. To “receive” the gospel is to accept the Christian remedy in law in order to abandon man’s law of mammon. Belief is more easily understood here as confidence or trust. It is the state of being by one in receivership of God’s authority over man.)
Receive – v.t. [Latin recipio; re and capio, to take.] 1. To take, as a thing offered or sent; to accept. He had the offer of a donation, but he would not receive it. 2. To take as due or as a reward. He received the money on the day it was payable. He received ample compensation. 3. To take or obtain from another in any manner, and either good or evil. Shall we receive good at the hand of God, and shall we not receive evil? Job 2:10… 5. To take or obtain intellectually; as, to receive an opinion or notion from others. 6. To embrace. Receive with meekness the engrafted word. James 1:7. 7. To allow; to hold; to retain; as a custom long received. 8. To admit. Thou shalt guide me with thy counsel, and afterward receive me to glory. Psalms 73:24. 9. To welcome; to lodge and entertain; as a guest. 10. To admit into membership or fellowship. Him that is weak in the faith, receive ye. Romans 14:1. 11. To take in or on; to hold; to contain. 12. To be endowed with. Ye shall receive power after that the Holy Spirit has come upon you. Acts 1:8. 13. To take into a place or state. After the Lord had spoken to them, he was received up into heaven. Mark 16:19. 14. To take or have as something ascribed; as, to receive praise or blame. Revelation 4:11. Revelation 5:12. 15. To bear with or suffer. 2 Corinthians 11:4. 16. To believe in. John 1:11. 17. To accept or admit officially or in an official character. The minister was received by the emperor or court. 18. To take stolen goods from a thief, knowing them to be stolen.
Reciever – n. 1. One who takes or receives in any manner. 2. An officer appointed to receive public money; a treasurer. 3. One who takes stolen goods from a thief, knowing them to be stolen, and incurs the guilt of partaking in the crime (i.e. sin). 4. A vessel for receiving and containing the product of distillation. 5. The vessel of an air pump, for containing the thing on which an experiment is to be made. 6. One who partakes of the sacrament (oath).
(Note: In law, the human body is considered a fleshly vessel that carries the soul. Upon that body is placed in surety a person. This requires voluntary receipt of that demon in possession and use. Is it so hard to accept grace as remedy of God in renunciation of government’s person when all of your life you’ve accepted and embraced the artificial fiction of government in its stead? Would it harm your ego so badly to accept the endowment of Christ as your Lord and Savior, even as you now accept government as your god, if it meant being free of bonded debt-slavery? Still think we are talking about religion here, oh foolish one? The ego is the devils prize, for it prevents good men from shining true to their natural character. And religion is the devil’s (man’s) tool to prevent ego death and thus the peace and natural liberty of mankind. And so man remains in hell as long as he lives on Earth, all the time avoiding the heaven it could be.)
Confidence – n. [Latin See Confide.] 1. A trusting, or reliance; an assurance of mind or firm belief in the integrity, stability or veracity of another (either God or mammon), or in the truth and reality of a fact. It is better to trust in the Lord, than to put confidence in man. Psalms 118:8. I rejoice that I have confidence in you in all things. 2 Corinthians 7:16. Mutual confidence is the basis of social happiness. I place confidence in a statement, or in an official report. 2. Trust; reliance; applied to one’s own abilities, or fortune; belief in one’s own competency. 3. That in which trust is placed; ground of trust; he or that which supports. Jehovah shall be thy confidence Proverbs 3:26. 4. Safety, or assurance of safety; security. 5. Boldness; courage. Preaching the kingdom of God with all confidence Acts 28:31.
(Note: Is government a fact, a truth, and a reality? Do you trust in it? Do you freely place your confidence in it? Is your faith in it? Isn’t insanity really defined as putting your faith in men (government) over and over and expecting different results? Do you understand now that faith, trust, and confidence are all legally BINDING terms?)
Testament – n. [Latin testamentum, from testor, to make a will.] 1. A solemn authentic instrument in writing, by which a person declares his will as to the disposal of his estate and effects after his death. This is otherwise called a will. A testament to be valid, must be made when the testator is of sound mind, and it must be subscribed, witnessed and published in such manner as the law prescribes. 2. The name of each general division of the canonical books of the sacred Scriptures; as the Old Testament; the New testament. The name is equivalent to covenant, and in our use of it, we apply it to the books which contain the old and new dispensations; that of Moses, and that of Jesus Christ. In the primitive church, those who had been instructed in the truths of the gospel and baptized, were called believers; in distinction from the catechumens, who were under instruction, as preparatory to baptism and admission to church privileges. Synonym = evidence.
Witness – n. 1. Testimony; attestation of a fact or event. If I bear witness of myself, my witness is not true. John 5:31. 2. That which furnishes evidence or proof… 3. A person who knows or sees any thing; one personally present; as, he was witness; he was an eye-witness. 1 Peter 5:1. 4. One who sees the execution of an instrument, and subscribes it for the purpose of confirming its authenticity b his testimony. 5. One who gives testimony; as, the witnesses in court agreed in all essential facts. – v.t. 1. To see or know by personal presence… 2. To attest; to give testimony to; to testify to something. Behold, how many things they witness against thee. Mark 15:4. 3. To see the execution of an instrument, and subscribe it for the purpose of establishing its authenticity; as, to witness a bond or a deed. – v.i. 1. To bear testimony. 2. To give evidence.
(Note: The popular religions term to “be a witness for Christ” is yet another misapplied legal action by misleading or mislead religious corporations. To witness for Christ is to legally attest that your law is under God through His remedy called Christ Jesus. Doing so in a religious setting has no weight in law. Witnessing, however, in court of law or in a legal declaration overrules man’s law, with Christ as your witness. This is the presentation of evidence of God’s law which exempts man from the law of man and mammon. Without a witness, there be no crime. A person may not use Christ as a witness, for a person is not known to God. Only a man who abandons the surname and benefits of person-hood may use the Bible and the character of Christ as witness and evidence of law above that of man. There can be no uncertainty in your faith and belief – your slavery to Christ as Lord.)
Certainty – n. 1. A fixed or real state; truth; fact. 2. Full assurance of mind; exemption from doubt… perception of the agreement or disagreement of our ideas. 3. Exemption from failure; as the certainty of an event, or of the success of a medicine. The certainty of punishment is the truest security against crimes. 4. Regularity; settled state.
(Note: It’s your choice… your state of being is either real or fiction. Are you certain you can prove you are only a human being without a another state?)
Exemption – n. The act of exempting; the state of being exempt. 1. Freedom from any service, charge, burden, tax, evil or requisition, to which others are subject; immunity; privilege. No man can claim an exemption from pain, sorrow or death.
(Note: A fictional person may never be exempt from government, for the person is property of government and subject to all its (creator’s) laws. Government is the author of that fictional character in its fictional tale. The only true exemption, redemption, and remedy happens within the real, and is declared with abandonment of the false.)
Evil – n. Evil is natural or moral. Natural evil is any thing which produces pain, distress, loss or calamity, or which in any way disturbs the peace, impairs the happiness, or destroys the perfection of natural beings. Moral evil is any deviation of a moral agent from the rules of conduct prescribed to him by God, or by legitimate human authority; or it is any violation of the plain principles of justice and rectitude. There are also evils called civil, which affect injuriously the peace or prosperity of a city or state; and political evils, which injure a nation, in its public capacity. All wickedness, all crimes, all violations of law and right are moral evils. Diseases are natural evils, but they often proceed from moral evils. 2. Misfortune; mischief; injury. There shall no evil befall thee. Psalms 91:10. A prudent man foreseeth the evil and hideth himself. Proverbs 22:3. 3. Depravity; corruption of heart, or disposition to commit wickedness; malignity. The heart of the sons of men is full of evil Ecclesiastes 9:3. 4. Malady; as the king’s evil or scrophula. – adv. [generally contracted to ill.] 1. Not well; not with justice or propriety; unsuitable. Evil it beseems thee. 2. Not virtuously;not innocently… 4. Injuriously; not kindly. The Egyptians evil entreated us, and afflicted us. In composition, evil denoting something bad or wrong, is often contracted to ill.
(Note: In a word, evil is described as “against government”. By assuming the persona of artificiality or fiction, government gives license to commit ill deeds that injure others, as a license to kill. No such license exists in natural law or under God, except in defense of life and the natural realm. License is permission by “god” the government to commit an illegal and/or immoral act. But remember, government also considers true Christianity to be amoral and sin against government. False gods do not like loosing slaves. Ironically, it is the goal of the Christian to become illegal in the eyes of government law, meaning not approved or created by that law. Disturbing the three great natural unalienable rights of life, liberty (peace) and happiness is a natural evil caused by political authority, and is a done deal once citizenship is accepted over God’s grace.)
Moral – n. Morality; the doctrine or practice of the duties of life. 1. The doctrine inculcated by a fiction; the accommodation of a fable to form the morals.
Fable – n. [Latin , Gr. The radical sense is that which is spoken or told.] 1. A feigned story or tale, intended to instruct or amuse; a fictitious narration intended to enforce some useful truth or precept. 2. Fiction in general; as, the story is all a fable. 3. An idle story; vicious or vulgar fictions. But refuse profane and old wives fables. 1 Timothy 4:7. 5. Falsehood; a softer term for a lie. – v.t. To feign; to invent; to devise and speak of, as true or real. The hell thou fablest.
(Note: The Bible is a moral fable “true or real” that is “intended to instruct” and “intended to enforce some useful truth or precept”.
Real – a. [Low Latin realis. The Latin res and Eng. thing coincide exactly with the Heb. a word, a thing, an event. See Read and Thing.] 1. Actually being or existing; not fictitious or imaginary; as a description of real life. The author describes a real scene or transaction. 2. True; genuine; not artificial, not counterfeit or factitious; as real Madeira wine; real ginger. 3. True; genuine; not affected; not assumed. The woman appears in her real character. 4. Relating to things, not to persons; not personal. 5. In law, pertaining to things fixed, permanent or immovable, as to lands and tenements; as real estate, opposed to personal or movable property.
(Note: Real means artificial in civil law, referring to title or status. Many words in legalese have opposite meanings from their conversational (non-legal) usage. In understanding the Bible and its remedy, we must understand the legal meaning, not what the corporate church preaches. The gods of religious doctrine are also “real” in concept, in that these gods are created on paper and don’t exist in nature.)
Covenant – n. [L, to come; a coming together; a meeting or agreement of minds.] 1. A mutual consent or agreement of two or more persons, to do or to forbear some act or thing; a contract; stipulation. A covenant is created by deed in writing, sealed and executed; or it may be implied in the contract. 2. A writing containing the terms of agreement or contract between parties; or the clause of agreement in a deed containing the covenant. 3. In theology, the covenant of works, is that implied in the commands, prohibitions, and promises of God; the promise of God to man, that mans perfect obedience should entitle him to happiness. The covenant of redemption, is the mutual agreement between the Father and Son, respecting the redemption of sinners by Christ. The covenant of grace, is that by which God engages to bestow salvation on man, upon the condition that man shall believe in Christ and yield obedience to the terms of the gospel. 4. In church affairs, a solemn agreement between the members of a church, that they will walk together according to the precepts of the gospel, in brotherly affection. – v. i. To enter into a formal agreement; to stipulate; to bind ones self by contract.
Covenant – In practice. The name of a common-law form of action ex contractu, which lies for the recovery of damages for breach of a covenant, or contract under seal. In the law of contracts. An agreement, convention, or promise of two or more parties, by deed in writing, signed, sealed, and delivered, by which either of the parties pledges himself to the other that something is either done or shall be done, or stipulates for the truth of certain facts. An agreement between two or more parties, reduced to writing and executed by sealing and delivery thereof, whereby some of the parties named therein engage, or one of them engages, with the other, or others, or some of them, therein also named, that some act hath or hath not already been done, or for the performance or non-performance of some specified duty. A promise by deed. (Black’s Law 1st)
‘Ark, n. [Latin arca.] 1. A small close vessel, chest or coffer, such as that which was the repository of the tablets of the covenant among the Jews… 3. A depository. Arise, O Lord, into thy rest, thou and the ark of thy strength. Psalms 132:8.
Depository – n. A place where any thing is lodged for safe-keeping. A warehouse is a depository for goods; a clerks office, for records.
(Note: There is no mystery as to what the “ark of the covenant” was. It was a bank depository – a safe-deposit box – used by the same money-changers that enslave us in debt today! It was not Christian; not of God; but of the corporate church. Today the U.S. Government’s ark holds the Birth Certificates printed on bank notes of all the United States persons in trust, today called a bank vault. The simple secret of the ark of the covenant is nothing more than human trafficking through the ancient system of pledging – human beings enfranchised as corporate person denizens (citizens) and traded on the securities markets as future labor. The ark story is nothing if not ceremonial idolatry by the church. The Bible explains how to instead live under a covenant with God (the laws of nature), through the legal remedy called “Jesus Christ”, which simply means to legally claim a spiritual covenant to God (nature) and also to abandon any pledge and allegiance to mammon by quitclaiming the surname.)
Consume – verb transitive [Latin , to take. So in English we say, it takes up time, that is, it consumes time.] 2. To destroy by dissipating or by use; to expend; to waste; to squander; as, to consume an estate. Ye ask, and receive not, because ye ask amiss, that ye may consume it upon your lusts. James 4:3. 3. To spend; to cause to pass away, as time; as, to consume the day in idleness. Their days did he consume in vanity. Psalms 78:33. 4. To cause to disappear; to waste slowly. 5. To destroy; to bring to utter ruin; to exterminate. Let me alone– that I may consume them. Exodus 32:10. The wicked shall perish–they shall consume Psalms 37:20.
(Note: Your status as a consumer is literally a hidden reference to gentiles (goyim) as persons serving mammon, thus the Biblical reference to “the wicked shall perish” is akin to “burning in hell” – which legally means being consumed by greed and held in an open-air debtor’s prison called the United States. See “hell” defined above. A consumer can only be a debtor slave, for money is but debt, and debt can never pay off debt.)
Testament – A disposition of personal property to take place after the owner’s decease, according to his desire and direction. A testament is the act of last will, clothed with certain solemnities, by which the testator disposes of his property, either universally, or by universal title, or by particular title. Civil Code La. art. 1571. Strictly speaking, the term denotes only a will of personal property; a will of land not being called a “testament.” The word “testament” is now seldom used, except m the heading of a formal will, which usually begins: “This is the last will and testament of me, A. B.,” etc. Sweet. (Black’s Law 1st)
Testament – n. [Latin testamentum, from testor, to make a will.] 1. A solemn authentic instrument in writing, by which a person declares his will as to the disposal of his estate and effects after his death. This is otherwise called a will. A testament to be valid, must be made when the testator is of sound mind, and it must be subscribed, witnessed and published in such manner as the law prescribes. A man in certain cases may make a valid will by words only, and such will is called nuncupative. 2. The name of each general division of the canonical books of the sacred Scriptures; as the Old Testament; the New testament. The name is equivalent to covenant, and in our use of it, we apply it to the books which contain the old and new dispensations; that of Moses, and that of Jesus Christ.
(Note: Testament is synonymous with evidence. The Vatican and its vicar pope claims to be the heir to the last will and testament of Jesus Christ (evidence of God’s will), creating a false god on and of the Earth as land-lord (god) of the temporal realm. By posing as or “impersonating” the Christ (until His alagorical return), through anointment and ceremony, the church claims the power to cleanse people of their sins that only God can forgive, and to somehow forgive digressions over that of God Himself, as if to invoke an earthly power to create a strange state of amnesia in God when a man dies and meets his maker, (that God will not know about a man’s sins?). Thus, the church gives “license” to commit all sorts of unlawful acts under and before God and nature but in the name of the fictional church while pretending to play the part of God’s ambassador on Earth, in clear contradiction to the sacred oath that says God will ultimately judge all of man’s actions. When any oath is taken, in all of law and any legal settings, it is taken to God as witness and ultimate judge under perjury. This is not theory, but has always been the traditional oath (sacramentum), and the church and government uses that oath as an excuse to play gods and land-lords of the secular temporal planet while convincing mankind to treat the church as God’s embassy.)
Redeem – To buy back. To liberate an estate or article from mortgage or pledge by paying the debt for which it stood as security. To repurchase in a literal sense; as, to redeem one’s land from a tax-sale. (Black’s Law 1st)
Redeemable – . 1. Subject to an obligation of redemption; embodying, or conditioned upon, a piomise or obligation of redemption; convertible into coin; as, a “redeemable currency.” 2. Subject to redemption; admitting of redemption or repurchase; given or held under conditions admitting of reacquisition by purchase; as, a “redeemable pledge.” (Black’s Law 1st)
Redeemable Rights – Rights which return to the conveyor or disposer of land, etc., upon payment of the sum for which such rights are granted. (Black’s Law 1st)
Redemption – A repurchase; a buying back… The liberation of a chattel from pledge or pawn, by paying the debt for which it stood as security. Repurchase of notes, bills, or other evidences of debt, (particularly bank-notes and paper-money,) by paying their value in coin to their holders. (Black’s Law 1st)
Redeem – v.t. [Latin redimo; red, re, and emo, to obtain or purchase.] 1. To purchase back; to ransom; to liberate or rescue from captivity or bondage, or from any obligation or liability to suffer or to be forfeited, by paying an equivalent; as, to redeem prisoners or captured goods; to redeem a pledge. 2. To repurchase what has been sold; to regain possession of a thing alienated, by repaying the value of it to the possessor. 3. To rescue; to recover; to deliver from. The mass of earth not yet redeemed from chaos. 5. To free by making atonement. Thou hast one daughter who redeems nature from the general curse. 7. To save. He could not have redeemed a portion of his time for contemplating the powers of nature. 8. To perform what has been promised; to make good by performance. He has redeemed his pledge or promise. 9. In law, to recall an estate, or to obtain the right to re-enter upon a mortgaged estate by paying to the mortgagee his principal, interest, and expenses or costs. 10. In theology, to rescue and deliver from the bondage of sin and the penalties of God’s violated law, by obedience and suffering in the place of the sinner, or by doing and suffering that which is accepted in lieu of the sinner’s obedience. Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us. Galatians 3:13. Titus 2:14.)
Redeemer – n. 1. One who redeems or ransoms. 2. The Savior of the world, JESUS CHRIST.
(Note: God’s violated law is the respect of persons. To be redeemed in law from this violation and from the bondage of sin (person-hood) is the goal of the follower of Christ’s teachings. But they must declare this in the redemption process. Redemption is to “deliver us from evil” of demonic possession, meaning to deliver us from government fiction.)
Savior – n. savyur. One that saves or preserves; but properly applied only to Jesus Christ, the Redeemer, who has opened the way to everlasting salvation by his obedience and death, and who is therefore called the savior by way of distinction, the savior of men, the savior of the world. General Washington may be called the saver, but not the savior of his country.
(Note: Why do we call Christ the redeemer? Why is Christ called a savior? Why do we say we are saved by Christ? Why does belief in Christ give onto us everlasting salvation? Because redeem, savior, save, belief, and salvation are all legal terms utilized to remedy man back into nature from the artificial church and government. The real question you should be asking is: Why have the corporate religions and secret societies lied about the true meaning of these words to the common man? Knowledge is power, and power is control. And the word govern literally translates to mean control. The truth: “Knowledge makes a man unfit to be a slave.” No controlling church or state wishes its members to learn that!)
Deliver – v.t. [Latin Free, disengaged; to free, to peel.] 1. To free; to release, as from restraint; to set at liberty; as, to deliver one from captivity. 2. To rescue, or save. Deliver me, O my God, from the hand of the wicked. Psalms 71:4. 3. To give, or transfer; to put into another’s hand or power; to commit; to pass from one to another. 4. To surrender; to yield; to give up; to resign; as, to deliver a fortress to an enemy. It is often followed by up; as, to deliver up the city; to deliver up stolen goods. 7. To exert in motion. To deliver to the wind, to cast away; to reject. To deliver over, to transfer; to give or pass from one to another; as, to deliver over goods to another.2. To surrender or resign; to put into anothers power; to commit to the discretion of; to abandon to. Deliver me not over to the will of my enemies. Psalms 27:12. To deliver up, to give up; to surrender.
(Note: To be delivered from evil is simply to be freed, released, liberated, rescued, saved, transferred, and resigned from the artificial person in total abandonment. It is the act of rejection of all of the fictional things of mammon. Forgive us our tresspasses (debts)… for thine is the kindom and the power and the glory forever…)
Trespass – n. In law, violation of another’s rights, not amounting to treason, felony, or misprision of either. Thus to enter another’s close, is a trespass; to attack his person is a trespass. When violence accompanies the act, it is called a trespass vi et armis. 1. Any injury or offense done to another. If ye forgive not men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses. Matthew 6:14. 2. Any voluntary transgression of the moral law; any violation of a known rule of duty; sin. Colossians 2:13. You hath he quickened, who were dead in trespasses and sins. Ephesians 2:1.
(Note: Though a difficult concept, we must forgive the trespass of all against our person, for we no longer accept the person as true, thus such trespass and harm cannot harm us. Bear no ill will towards men who attack your person in their own persona. Instead simply abandon and quitclaim-ing the person and forgive those who trespass against it, for it is an empty vessel of fiction unattached to your body and soul. Enmity by freed and delivered men over actions done by fictional persons to other fictional persons is foolish and ultimately pointless in nature. Forgiveness is paramount to peace. And most necessary is forgiveness of the self and any trespass and debt through redemption of Christ, legally speaking!)
Surrender, verb transitive [Latin sursum, and rendre, to render.] 1. To yield to the power of another; to give or deliver up possession upon compulsion or demand; as, to surrender one’s person to an enemy… 2. To yield; to give up; to resign in favor of another; as, to surrender a right or privilege; to surrender a place or an office. 3. To give up; to resign; as, to surrender the breath. 4. In law, to yield an estate, as a tenant, into the hands of the lord for such purposes as are expressed in the act. 5. To yield to any influence, passion or power; as, to surrender one’s self to grief, to despair, to indolence or to sleep. – v.t. To yield; to give up one’s self into the power of another. – n. The act of yielding or resigning one’s person or the possession of something, into the power of another; as the surrender of a castle to an enemy; the surrender of a right or of claims.2. In law, the yielding of an estate by a tenant to the lord, for such purposes as are expressed by the tenant in the act.
(Note: Quite simply, by surrendering to God and God’s plan of remedy through Christ, we surrender and thus abandon our surety and bond to the fictional person, holding no claim to rights or duties and claiming no redemption, privilege, or law from government. You must surrender your person back to its owner (government) in order to cease being liable for its usury charges and obligations (duties). You must cease to be a user of government property. Note also that this word is a combination of the word sur and the word render, and that in an official surrender it is the name that is given up in the action.)
Atonement – n. 1. Agreement; concord; reconciliation, after enmity or controversy. Romans 5:11. 2. Expiation; satisfaction or reparation made by giving an equivalent for an injury, or by doing or suffering that which is received in satisfaction for an offense or injury; with for. When a man has been guilty of any vice, the best atonement he can make for it is, to warn others not to fall into the like. 3. In theology, the expiation of sin made by the obedience and personal sufferings of Christ.
Purchase – v.t. [… purchaser is to pursue to the end or object, and hence to obtain. In Law Latin, purchase the noun, was written purchacium… In its primary and legal sense, to gain, obtain or acquire by any means, except by descent or hereditary right (to gain through artificial means without deserving). 2. In common usage, to buy; to obtain property by paying an equivalent in money. It differs from barter only in the circumstance, that in purchasing, the price or equivalent given or secured is money; in bartering, the equivalent is given in goods. We purchase lands or goods for ready money or on credit. 3. To obtain by an expense of labor, danger or other sacrifice; as, to purchase favor with flattery. 4. To expiate or recompense by a fine or forfeit; as, to purchase out abuses with tears and prayer. 5. To sue out or procure, as a writ… It is foolish to lay out money in the purchase of repentance.
Offering – p.p.t. Presenting; proposing; sacrificing; bidding; presenting to the eye or mind. – n. That which is presented in divine service; an animal or a portion of bread or corn, or of gold and silver, or other valuable articles, presented to God as an atonement for sin, or as a return of thanks for his favors, or for other religious purpose; a sacrifice; an oblation. In the Mosaic economy, there were burnt-offerings, sin-offerings, peace-offerings, trespass-offerings, thank-offerings, wave-offerings, and wood-offerings. Pagan nations also present offerings to their deities. Christ by the offering of himself has superseded the use of all other offerings, having made atonement for all men. When thou shalt make his soul an offering for sin, he shall see his seed – Isaiah 53:10.
(Note: Have you ever considered that by placing check or cash into an offering plate that you are actually participating in a blood sacrifice? After all, what thing has more innocent blood attached to it than that of the U.S. Dollar and the wars and many collective sins it represents? This offering of sacrifice is not to God, for God does not require such things. Only man would destroy what God creates. And if anything, the offering of mammon (money) to God could only be taken as a severe insult and blasphemy to everything Sacred and Holy in the Bible, which is totally against the concept of money.)
Dummy – n. One who holds legal title for another; a straw man. – a. Sham; make-believe; pretended; imitation. (Black’s Law 4rth)
Dummy Corporation – This term is given to a company that functions as a legal enterprise but really has nor purpose at all in the corporation. (Black’s Law 2nd)
Bail – v. To procure the release of a person from legal custody, by undertaking that he shall appear at the time and place
designated and submit himself to the jurisdiction and judgment of the court. To set at liberty a person arrested or imprisoned, on security being taken for his appearance on a day and a place certain, which security is called “bail,” because the party arrested or imprisoned is delivered into the hands of those who bind themselves for his forthcoming, (that is, become bail for his due appearance when required,) in order that he may be safely protected from prison. – n. In practice. The sureties who procure the release of a person under arrest, by becoming responsible for his appearance at the time and place designated. Those persons who become sureties for the appearance of the defendant in court. Upon those contracts of indemnity which are taken in legal proceedings as security for the performance of an obligation imposed or declared by the tribunals, and known as undertakings or recognizances, the sureties are called “bail.” In Canadian law. A lease. Bail erhphyteotique. A lease for years, with a right to prolong indefinitely. It is equivalent to an alienation.
Civil bail. That taken in civil actions. Special bail, being persons who undertake that if the defendant is condemned in the action he shall pay the debt or surrender himself for imprisonment.
(Note: Because the God-given name and the surname are connected in contract and consent, this is a fictional representation of the natural man and the artificial person also being connected. Though born naked and innocent, the man is immediately incorporated with the invisible veil of clothing of the corporate fiction person. For purely commercial purposes, the man acts as the person (man is legally an actor playing the part of the person) and is thus responsible for what the artificial person does in commerce. Of course, government passes laws that make every action in natural life appear to be a commercial venture in law, requiring licenses, permits, insurances, and other bondage tools in order to do just about everything that is in fact non-commercial in nature. This brings into law (in-jures) every action taken by the man and makes it commerce of the person, no matter how insignificant it may be. The artificial person is a debtor, we must not forget that. No man can be in debt, except to God, for man can have no other master and must abandon the debt system of mammon to be a slave to God. So any “crime” the person makes is always as a debtor. Thus, all prisons are debtor’s prisons. To get out of jail, the man must pay the debt of his strawman person in the form of bail, agreeing to appear as that artificial person in a debtor’s court. This ensures that man will fulfill his or her role as an actor, playing the part of the debtor person, appearing as a strawman.)
Strawman – 1. Draft or outline copy ready for suggestions and comments. 2. Third party used as a cover in illegal or shady deals. 3. Nominee director. 4. A weak or flawed person with no standing. Also called man of straw. See judgement proof. (Black’s Law 2nd)
Stramineus Homo – L. Lat. A man of straw, one of no substance, put forward as bail or surety.
Slave – n. A person who is wholly subject to the will of another; one who has no freedom of action, but whose person and services are wholly under the control of another. Webster. One who is under the power of a master, and who belongs to him; so that the master may sell and dispose of his person, of his industry, and of his labor, without his being able to do anything, have anything, or acquire anything, but what must belong to his master. Civil Code La. art. 35.
(Note: Here we understand that you cannot serve two masters (God and Mammon), or more to the point a man cannot be a slave to both. To declare oneself to be a “slave of Christ” or God is to declare oneself not to be a slave-person of government. This is a legal standing, not a religious sentiment. The court cannot recognize only a person of government (mammon), not a servant God. As a slave to God, a man can only acquire what is of God (natural) in nature, which means he or she cannot acquire (respect) a person or anything artificial or fictional in law. This creates a sort of automatic remedy by never allowing surety or bondage to any man-made thing, status, or person. But man must walk in the true Christian path to avoid such status, bondage, and person-hood.)
Sin Tax – An ad valorem tax or flat tax levied on services and goods that are considered to be morally or physically harmful such as alcohol, cigarettes and gambling. (Black’s Law 2nd)
(Note: Under government you ridiculously pay a tax as forgiveness of sin. Under God, you have no such forgiveness. Yet the church is there to reenforce this hypocrisy to God through doctrinal remission.)
Indulgence – In the Roman Catholic Church. A remission of the punishment due to sins, granted by the pope or church, and supposed to save the sinner from purgatory. Its abuse led to the Reformation in Germany. Forbearance…
Combustio – Burning. In old English law. The punishment inflicted upon apostates. (Black’s Law 1st)
(Note: Think debtors burning alive in the dungeons called hell for abandoning the church. True Christians that abandoned church and religious doctrine in seeking the peace and purity of God and Christ were burned, tortured, and thrown to the lions by the church and state, for they could not be controlled by man’s law. True Christianity is indeed illegal.)
Apostata – In civil and old English law. An apostate; a deserter from the faith; one who has renounced the Christian faith. (Black’s Law 1st)
(Note: Here the word faith is stated as a legal status; as a person, member, or citizen of the church and state. Your personal (illegal) faith does not matter to the church and state, only your legally pledged faith as servitude to that corporate structure’s control of your person. Abandonment makes you an apostate of the corporate structure, but in God’s eyes as a legal remedy it makes you a true Biblical Christian immune to corporate law.)
Apostasy – In English law. The total renunciation of Christianity, by embracing either a false religion or no religion at all. This offense can only take place in such as have once professed the Christian religion. (Black’s Law 1st)
Apostate – n. [Gr.] One who has forsaken the church, sect or profession to which he before adhered. In its original sense, applied to one who has abandoned his religion; but correctly applied also to one who abandons a political or other party. – a. False; traitorous. (Black’s Law 1st)
(Note: Apostasy was part of the law of the land, created by the church, and not just some religious concept without true legal meaning. Yet again the Bible refers to the “vicar” of the Christ here, as an apostate is one who forsakes the church/government, not to be mistaken for the abandonment of God (creator). To be an apostate is a declaration of abandonment of a corporate church and its doctrinal religion upon a person, having nothing to do with the Bible or with God. It is not a sin against God to quitclaim religion, but rather only a sin against government and corporate church. The word sin in the Bible ofter refers to sin against church and state (the god or landlord), not sin against God Himself.)
Fictio – In Roman law. A fiction; an assumption or supposition of the law. “Fictio” in the old Roman law was properly a term of pleading, and signified a false averment on the part of the plaintiff which the defendant was not allowed to traverse; as that the plaintiff was a Roman citizen, when in truth he was a foreigner. The object of the fiction was to give the court jurisdiction. (Black’s Law 1st)
Fiction – n. [Latin fictio, from fingo, to feign.] 1. The act of feigning, inventing or imagining; as, by the mere fiction of the mind. 2. That which is feigned, invented or imagined. The story is a fiction. So also was the fiction of those golden apples kept by a dragon, taken from the serpent which tempted Eve.
Fiction – An assumption or supposition of law that something which is or may be false is true, or that a state of facts exists which has never really taken place. A fiction is a rule of law which assumes as true, and will not allow to be disproved, something which is false, but not impossible. Fictions are to be distinguished from presumptions of law. By the former (fiction), something known to be false or unreal is assumed as true; by the latter (presumtion of law), an inference is set up, which may be and probably is true, but which, at any rate, the law will not permit to be controverted. (Black’s Law 1st)
(Note: Though the courts know and recognize that a person is not alive, not true, imaginary, feigned, invented, and completely false, the government itself falls under that same description, and thus a fiction can only recognize another fiction. A living man is unrecognizable in court without a surname (person), as government only has jurisdiction over fictions, and government holds no authority over men claimed in surety to Christ.)
Overcome – v.t. [See Come.] 1. To conquer; to vanquish; to subdue; as, to overcome enemies in battle. 2. To surmount; to get the better of; as, to overcome difficulties or obstacles. 3. To overflow; to surcharge. – v.i. To gain the superiority; to be victorious. Romans 3:4.
Overcome – As used in a statute providing that a presumption may be overcome by other evidence, this term is not synonymous with overbalance or outweigh, but requires merely that such evidence counterbalance the presumption, where the party relying on it has the burden of proof. (Black’s Law 4rth)
Overcome – a term that is used for overcoming evidence that is presented by a party to a suit by presenting more convincing evidence. (Black’s Law 2nd)
(Note: Evidence of God’s laws of nature is always better and of higher authority as evidence than any fiction of man’s law.)
Enfranchise – To make free; to incorporate a man in a society or body politic. (Black’s Law 1st)
Enfranchisement – The act of making free; giving a franchise or freedom to; investiture with privileges or capacities of freedom, or municipal or political liberty. Admission to the freedom of a city; admission to political rights, and particularly the right of suffrage (voting). Anciently, the acquisition of freedom by a villein from his lord. The word is now used principally either of the manumission of slaves, (or) of giving to a borough or other constituency a right to return a member or members to parliament, or of the conversion of copyhold into freehold.
(Final Note: The word citizen stems from the word denizen, which means to enfranchise slaves and lower class common men into an equal state under the law. This signifies the act of assigning a surname to a man or slave and assigning that name to certain privileges, otherwise known as political rights. The citizen should know that the words freedom, liberty, and rights are all alienable privileges granted by government to persons (citizens). The word free-dom means obey the law of man or be punished. The word liberty means the same – to be free to act as long as man’s law is followed. The prefix “dom” means dominion, so as to signify that the state of being free for a man is dominated by the state, which it calls political freedom or political or civil liberty. Man can only be free under God, whereas he can only have artificial freedom under mammon, for he impersonates a regulated fiction of mammon. Like a rented car (vehicle), the fictional person (vehicle) comes with many rules for the user to comply with under force of law. In nature, the only law is to do no harm, and as long as this is maintained, a man is always free to do as he pleases. The word people means gentiles; common peasants; the lowest form of person and societal status. If you are one of the people, then you have no voice, only the collective has the voice, and it is completely controlled by the noble (higher) wealthy class. Knowing this, I wish you luck in your continuing disgrace in nature as you posses like a demon your rented fiction of man.
–=–
Conclusion
–=–
While there are many other words that could be contemplated here for their legal capacity within the Bible, I hope that this journey has opened your eyes to the reality of your disposition in life and in the fictional hell you live in. This writing has not been intended to offend or defend any one or any thing, but is given freely in genuine care and concern for my fellow man. No man can be free until all men are free. And we certainly are harmed by our lack of knowledge. Please understand that your personal beliefs in the comprehension of God are not the subject of this essay, nor should they interfere with the legal language. For the legal law knows no emotion, ethics, morals, values, love, hate, or any other human emotion or adoration, and so we must separate our conversational word from our legal words. this is one of the hardest things you will ever have to do in your life, even as the realization of the purposefully dualistic nature of the English language becomes ultimately and agonizingly apparent. I wish you the very best in your journey, and hope this collection will be an integral tool in your redemption from the tyranny of men.
I have suffered fools, including myself, for too long now. I redeem myself to the reader in hopeful abandon that the world can change and that all men can live be free…
.
—(Christian name) Clint (Surname) Richardson – (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Wednesday, April 3oth, 2014
REALITY BLOG 
Keith
/ April 30, 2014“natural law” and “natural rights” are what is NOT Biblical. Clint believes the same heresies as the followers of “enlightenment” philosophy, like Washington and Jefferson for instance. These unrepentant, unbelieving men hated the truth of the word of God, and by the word of God, those unbelievers are who God casts to hell (soul only until their judgment at the white throne, then body and soul -Rev 21:11-13, Mat. 10:28). It seems like Clint believes contemporary heretics like Lorain Day instead of the word of God. “everlasting punishment”, “eternal damnation”, “where the worm dieth not and the fire is not quenched”, etc. are what true believers are called to believe.
LikeLike
realitybloger
/ May 1, 2014How very un-Christian of you to say so. Thanks. Your religious beliefs have no place in a reasonable discussion about the Bible. Law has not morals, ethics, or values, and thus we must discuss the topic not as what should be, but what is. Above all, don’t you think God wants you to use your brain as opposed to acting like a scared, caged animal?
And by the way, have you not read or heard my opinion of the “enlightenment” New Age mumbo Jumbo? Have you not read or heard my villainization of the constitution and the “founding fathers”/ Your accusations are a bit silly if not.
LikeLike
Keith
/ May 1, 2014You say “acting like a scared, caged animal” when you know nothing about how I act or whether I fear what man or gov. can do to me. It is not “un-Christian” to speak against and expose heresies. Read all the epistles of Paul if you don’t believe me. If you really want to understand what the Bible has to say about Satan, why not look up the name in a concordance and follow it through the law and the prophets and the newer scriptures? Pay attention to Job 1&2, every thing Christ says about Satan, and all other names such as “prince of this world”,” prince of the power of the air”, “the devil” not just any of the many devils), “Beezlbub”, and many others. Don’t forget to study Isa. 14 and Ezek. 28, we learn much about Satan in these chapters. Did men or government take Christ up on the high mountain and show him all the kingdoms of the world in a moment of time (Mat.4:8, Luke4:5), or did the highest of the fallen angles, Satan do this? Angels are spirits, not men (Heb. 1:14)? Was King David tempted by gov. or Satan to number Israel’s army? David was the head of the gov. Could it be that you Clint, are prejudging the word, not having sufficient study of it? The Bible says many will not understand and some cannot understand. Could you be one of these?
LikeLike
ralph isley
/ April 23, 2015excellent
LikeLike
George
/ July 1, 2014One must understand who the men where that filtered what would make it in or out of the King James Bible. What most are missing here is how this very doctrine of Christianity serves their slavery systems. I.e. Sacrifice is a virtue, not permanent cures, solutions and understanding. Much easier to get the serf classes to fight their wars of plunder.
Truth from authority, not facts, data, reason and evidence, the accuracy in understanding that has led to the internet and the very computer you are typing on. The Christian religion is by design to serve the elite, you are promised something far better when you are dead, so you put up with the dread of living with these elites burdens they are placing on all of us. Permanent cures and solutions threaten their profit schemes, they keep your mind mucked up in religious ideologies so you have no means to know first hand, you become an intellectual second hander by design. Dependent on anyone but your own reasoning mind, trust it is no accident that you aren’t taught logic, reason, critical thinking skills by their designs as well. You would see right through this mind fraud.
All part of the game, why would anyone thinking these elite men would leave the very operating system for the human mind up to chance, know your religious beliefs serve their agenda each and every step of the way.
LikeLike
Adrian
/ May 1, 2014Guys I believe that the biggest hoax of all is the expression: IN GOD WE TRUST.
Reality is what is it.
If does not appear does not exist.What you cannot prove is not real.
GOD is the myth by which humanity was enslaved.
The Global Imperialism is upon us.Your struggle against IT is your salvation.
We only succeed in numbers.
LikeLike
Keith
/ May 1, 2014I neglected to say, Clint that I have read your posts, almost all of them. I think you have done great works on the constitution, CAFR, vaccines, and others. Have you ever seen the research of James Montgomery and a man who goes by the “the informer”? You can find their research on the website- thinkorbebeaten.com. Attorneys in England (you must be a member of the Bar in England even to access the law libraries and archives) got involved and provided a certified copy of the Treaty of Peace – Paris 1783. Ben Franklin, John Adams, and John Jay (all having the title of nobility “Esquire”, signed for the American delegation) . Interesting fact that King George III’s attorney had the same title, and all parties had allegiance to the crown temple. But both these researchers are still deceived by the proper nouns “Jew” and “Gentile”, and cannot identify who the family Israel is in today’s world. With all the research they provided, they did not find the truth of the word of God. They fought the worldly battles but fell short of understanding the law of God (precepts, commandments, ordinances, statutes, judgments, and COVENANTS). Jer. 31:31-34 and Heb. 8:8-10 tell us exactly who the new covenant is made with and the terms and conditions too (parties: house of Israel and house of Judah[all Israel]) and terms: that God would write his law in the heart and on the mind). I could write much more but I prefer to speak in person or on the phone. If you email me I’ll send you my number. Should we fight all these battles which we cannot win, only to lose the war that we can win, with the understanding of God? southkeith@yahoo.com. I say again, I’m not your enemy, just think you need help understanding the word of God. I have 21 yrs. of study after I understood I was an Israelite according to the flesh ( not “spiritual Israel”). I am not a novice in Biblical law.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine
/ May 5, 2014All of this is great as long you keep HIS GRACE in the picture. Unfortunately, Marcus at Servant King is just another Judaiser.
You also need to understand that The KJV is the translation work of Freemasons and those of the satanic Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion.
Yashua Messiah did not come to this earth in order to set up a religion. The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion in ALL its guises is the work of The Devil’s agents – The Tares.
LikeLike
Julie
/ May 1, 2014Thank you, Clint for sharing your due diligence with us. More than informative. In particular, you’ve explained the act of Abjuring the Realm in such simple terms that, once I read it, I couldn’t believe I didn’t “get it” before. Iron sharpens mush, evidently. I have followed Daniel over here to your broadcasts and blog and I think I am nearly ready to formulate my own good faith notice. Again, thank you. Julie
LikeLike
andrew grandinetti
/ May 4, 2014Wow – this is a great, detailed writing. It is similar to what Marcus at servantking.org talks about.
LikeLike
Aljosa
/ May 5, 2014It can sound strange, maybe, but here’s my point of view on “current” situation:
Sovereign Freeman: Notice Of Bankruptcy Of The Republic Of Croatia
http://cromalternativemoney.org/index.php/en/media/news/sovereign-freeman-notice-of-bankruptcy-of-the-republic-of-croatia.html
LikeLike
David Merrill
/ May 6, 2014I started your article because I see CODE too. But you lost my interest with all the PERSON/Man or Woman business.
“They shall be redeemed in lawful money on demand…”
There it is in plain text right there in the Fed Act. Congress would not use a pronoun for Federal Reserve notes; they would just write in “Federal Reserve notes”. They mean People – men and women. Look for yourself – Title 12 USC 411 from Section 16 of the Fed Act.
The remainder is that Paul spent the last five years of life on and maybe creating the Roman Welfare State, and the last three writing letters from protective custody that formed the Christian Religion, so go figure why Christianity creates a welfare state…
Mnason, a Cypriot Jew with whom we LODGED…
The key is right there in the Epistle Dedicatory to any KJV Bible! In Mark 4 we find that anything and everything Jesus said outside his inner apocalyptic mystery cult (11 men and 1 woman) was encrypted (parables). EVERYTHING! So the entire New Testament Bible Story is allegorical metaphor! That is what the Bible says…
LikeLike
Ray
/ May 9, 2014Clint, How might one contact Daniel?
LikeLike
realitybloger
/ May 10, 2014Hi. His youtube channel is “ChristianRemedyInLaw”. Otherwise, I’ll ask him if its ok to give out his email on this Wednesday’s show.
-Clint-
LikeLike
geoffreyfranklin
/ June 2, 2014Clint is certainly a very good and prolific writer. Hang on a minute maybe I should look up the word prolific before I get myself in trouble.
LikeLike
Edward Johnston
/ July 13, 2014This is right on As I’m told my bloodline is yous know..USA un ited states for Americans the only place on the planet free from slavery u know.. This why the USA
http://www.oregontrackers.com read you constitutional laws of freedom from the devil’s contracts http://www.oregontrackers.com read and a must listen in Jesus name too
New Private Call with Robb Ryder and John Richard – Mon, July 7, 2014
Is Ecclesiastical Canon Law the control over the US Court System ?
A discussion of this theory as a possible remedy !
The doctrine of Crimes Against Humanity actually called
“Human Rights Violations.” We are being “violated” by the US Courts and it
comes under the UN and further under Vatican City State Law… the
infrastructure’s understood ultimate controller of ALL systems in today’s world !
This is high level research for advanced listeners and researchers !
http://recordings.talkshoe.com/TC-48361/TS-876877.mp3 2 hrs 2 min
TS
recordings.talkshoe.com
[audio src="http://recordings.talkshoe.com/TC-48361/TS-876877.mp3" /]
posted by edward johnston
Stop paying the devil’s taxes, Call your servants and tell them too send all illegals back home. We have enough taking care of our own family’s. We can not afford to
go hungry for foreign agents. It their masters problems not the USA.peace and god bless Jesus,,, Ad Offers Up To $6054 a Month, TAX FREE, to House Illegal Immigrant Children alt Ad Offers Up To $6054 a Month, TAX FREE, to House Illegal Immigrant Children –
http://www.dcclothesline.com
With half of the population now making less than $27,520 per year America is hurting and the middle …
With half of the population now making less than $27,520 per yea
18 U.S. Code § 2381 – Treason | LII / Legal Information Institute
The table below lists the classification updates, since Jan. 3, 2012, for this section. Updates to a broader range of sections may be found at the update page for containing chapter, title, etc.
law.cornell.edu
America is hurting and the middle … BAR members are most-assuredly to be removed from any position of power in this nation, by We, the People … who demand the true justice and right that these [criminal] BAR members have stolen from us toward their own egregious personal gains!!!
BAR Members,All BAR Members are foreign agents of the Vatican.
Cracking The Legal Code Of King James
LikeLike
Edward Johnston
/ July 13, 2014Play Video
Walter Burien speaking to the Health and Freedom Conference – 2010
Walter Burien speaks to the Health and Freedom Conference in California 2010. Government collective wealth by government institutional investment funds held …
LikeLike
Edward Johnston
/ July 13, 2014HOSPITAL REGISTRY staff, REGISTRARS, CLERKS AND ALL TAKERS OF NAMES ETC…DID YOU KNOW…
1. By forcing, coercing, convincing, threatening and all manner of intimidation etc. Mothers and Fathers to REGISTER their children, YOU are, in
FACT, AIDING AND ABETTING all Mothers and Fathers into FRAUD via theirs and your ignorance of the SLAVERY SYSTEM of the CROWN
CORPORATION and are GUILTY as such?
2. That once a child is REGISTERED, the CHILD, by association with that REGISTERED NAME, is assumed and presumed a BOND DEBTOR/SLAVE
and is LEGALLY OWNED by the CROWN CORPORATION if that child ever uses that NAME in acts of COMMERCE/IDENTIFICATION?
3. That because you are, in FACT, also using a CROWN COPYRIGHTED NAME, LEGALLY REGISTERED as such, YOU have “UNCLEAN HANDS” and are
GUILTY of FRAUD by using, affixing, claiming etc. a NAME you BELIEVE to be yours when, in FACT, it isn’t and never was yours to use AFTER it was
REGISTERED by YOUR parents?
4. Every REGISTRATION FRAUD you commit knowingly/unknowingly makes you GUILTY of ENTICEMENT INTO SLAVERY, AIDING AND ABETTING
ANOTHER INTO FRAUD etc. and renders an innocent child a DEBTSERVANT/BONDSMAN/SLAVE for the rest of their lives or until this
FRAUDULENT ACT is reversed?
5. By claiming YOUR NAME as yours you are GUILTY of FALSE IMPERSONATION and even more so if you claim any/all TITLES/OFFICES
(MR./MRS./CLERK/HEAD NURSE/REGISTRAR etc.) with any/all IDENTIFICATION that creates JOINDER with the NAME you do NOT own/have any
rights to?
6. Any/All use of IDENTIFICATION created from the BIRTH CERTIFICATE renders any/all users of that CROWN COPYRIGHTED PROPERTY/NAME
guilty of FRAUD/FALSE IMPERSONATION from the instant that NAME is REGISTERED until DEATH/FRAUD REVEALED?
7. A BIRTH CERTIFICATE is, in FACT, a DEATH CERTIFICATE creating a DEAD LEGAL FICTION upon its creation and it renders any/all
users/CLAIMANTS/DEFENDANTS/AFFIANTS etc. GUILTY of FALSE IMPERSONATION and in immediate DISHONOUR in the eyes of ALL CROWN
OWNED AND OPERATED COURTS OF ADMIRALTY (PHOENICIAN LAW MERCHANTS) whereupon any/all FINES/CHARGES/LIENS/LEVIES/PROPERTY
ETC. are automatically under OWNERSHIP of the CROWN CORPORATION where the UNAUTHORISED USER of such NAMES is fully LIABLE?
8. That YOU, are inflicting a lifetime of SERVITUDE upon all children/people YOU REGISTER whereupon a BOND is created, typically in the range
of ONE MILLION dollars, creating the DEBT against the life and PERFORMANCE (BOND) of the one that is REGISTERED and whereupon ALL
MONEY is thereby created?
9. You are an enabler of a SLAVE SYSTEM OF HUMANITY and are GUILTY with every child you REGISTER (to rule, divine feminine creation
translated) whereupon the true G.I.F.T. (Gamete Intra-Fallopian Transfer) given up is the very life essence of the one being REGISTERED where
the GUILT is maximized with any/all coercion, intimidation, threats, deception etc. YOU attempt to enforce REGISTRATION against any/all beings
who do not wish to REGISTER their children?
Look in the mirror and see the criminal that you are, whether you knew this or not but now that you do, you have a choice. You can continue to
commit these CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY for some filthy lucre called money upon which a souls’ value is placed or you can begin to heal these
FRAUDS VIA DECEPTIOS by waking up to this very real situation. You, and all people with REGISTERED NAMES are PROPERTY OF THE CROWN
CORPORATION/BONDSERVANT/SERVITUDE SLAVE and it would be in the interest of all parties concerned with the exception of any/all TEMPLE
BAR MEMBERS (BRITISH ACCREDITED REGISTRY) AGENTS OF THE CITY OF LONDON, STATE who are the ones that created and profit from the
SERVITUDE of a system they created and YOU AID AND ABET the FRAUDS to uphold it. You can research these facts for yourself because I know
you will find it difficult to comprehend the magnitude of your crimes every time you REGISTER a child. As a first step, go and try to procure
ANY/ALL GOVERNMENT IDENTIFICATION without a BIRTH CERTIFICATE. Typically, a passport is the best start whereupon all other forms of
IDENTIFICATION need a GOVERNMENT ISSUED I.D. Given that the BIRTH CERTIFICATE is NOT to be used for identification purposes and is, in fact,
a CRIME to do so, you may begin here to ask yourself why? For further information on this please feel free to visit my website
http://kateofgaia.wordpress.com and pop by the “kate’s writings” page. Now you know and are fully obligated to act upon truth because to do
otherwise only proves your fraudulent programmed nature. Have a nice day
LikeLike
Edward Johnston
/ July 13, 2014Legislature passed motor vehicle laws regulating “drivers for hire” and has never expanded them beyond that subject class, per Dexter Johnson’s own statement.
Yet police routinely enforce the Vehicle Code against nonbusiness automobile users. Eighteen Sheriffs have explicitly said so.
The reason for the mis-enforcement is that the police are relying on the ORS, which does not reflect the legislative intent that only business vehicles are to be regulated.
The result is a sort of extortion, whereby millions of dollars are being collected wrongfully from Oregon citizens. In addition, road upkeep costs are being shifted from trucking companies onto the general public.
This mis-enforcement can be stopped easily, if Legislative Counsel Dexter Johnson revises the Oregon Vehicle Code to clarify that it is a business regulation applicable only to vehicles used for compensation or profit.
Restore Republican Form of Government to Oregon
——————————–
Instead of enforcing the laws passed by the Legislature, Oregon police enforce the O.R.S. written by Legislative Counsel Dexter Johnson and earlier occupants of that office. Any mismatch between the Acts and the O.R.S. constitutes a failure to have a Republican Form of Government, in which the People’s representatives write the laws that are enforced.
Make good on the promise of the Constitution: “The United States shall guarantee to every state in this union a republican form of government[.]” (Article IV, Clause 4)
Please see video for more information and details, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L1WW4PwNV5w
Carl Miller – Right to travel without a license pl
The CAFR Swindle – The Biggest Game In Town
posted by Edward Johnston,,
anti-fraud activities,
rating, or underwriting, 18 U.S.C. 2721(b)(6); to notify
owners of towed or impounded vehicles, 18 U.S.C.
2721(b)(7); by licensed private investigative agencies or
security services for permitted purposes, 18 U.S.C.
2721(b)(8); for use by employers to verify information
relating to a holder of a commercial driver’s license, 18
U.S.C. 2721(b)(9) (1994 & Supp. III 1997); and for use in
connection with private tollways, 18 U.S.C. 2721(b)(10).
In addition, personal information in motor vehicle re-
cords may be disclosed in certain circumstances for
bulk distribution for surveys, marketing, or solicitation,
but only if individuals are provided an opportunity, in a
clear and conspicuous manner, to block such use of
information pertaining to them. 18 U.S.C. 2721(b)(12).
Thus, disclosure of motor vehicle information about an
individual for direct-marketing purposes is prohibited
unless (a) the individual is provided the opportunity,
under Section 2721(b)(11), to block general disclosure of
his personal information, and declines that opportunity,
or (b) the individual is given the opportunity to block
use of his personal information for direct marketing
specifically, and declines that opportunity.
4
b. The DPPA also regulates the resale and redis-
closure of motor vehicle information by private persons
who have obtained that information from a DMV. See
18 U.S.C. 2721(c) (1994 & Supp. III 1997). The DPPA’s
restrictions on resale and redisclosure by private
4
The DPPA also provides that personal information in motor
vehicle records “shall be disclosed” for certain specific purposes
pursuant to other federal statutes. 18 U.S.C. 2721(b) (1994 &
Supp. III 1997). As we explain below (pp. 28-29 n.12,
infra
), that
provision does not impose any new disclosure requirements, but
rather makes clear that the DPPA does not bar disclosures other-
wise required by federal law.
Janet Reno Right To Travel Brief 98-1464.pdf
Click to access Janet%20Reno%20Right%20To%20Travel%20Brief%2098-1464.pdf
Click to access Janet%20Reno%20Right%20To%20Travel%20Brief%2098-1464.pdf
use your pass port or birth papers U.S. SUPREME COURT AND OTHER HIGH COURT CITATIONS PROVING THAT NO LICENSE IS NECESSARY FOR NORMAL USE OF AN AUTOMOBILE ON COMMON WAYS
“The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, by horse- drawn carriage, wagon, or automobile, is not a mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at
will, but a common right which he has under his right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Under this constitutional guaranty one may, therefore, under normal conditions, travel at his inclination along the public highways or in public places, and while conducting himself in an orderly and decent manner, neither interfering with nor disturbing another’s rights, he will be protected, not only in his person, but in his safe
conduct ” Thompson v.Smith, 154 SE 579, 11 American Jurisprudence, Constitutional Law, section 329, page 1135
“The right of the Citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon,
in the ordinary course of life and business, is a common right which he has under the right to enjoy life and liberty, to acquire and possess property, and to pursue happiness and safety. It includes the right, in so doing, to use the ordinary and usual conveyances of the day, and under the existing modes of travel, includes the right to drive a horse drawn carriage or wagon thereon or to operate an automobile thereon, for the usual and ordinary purpose of life and business.” -Thompson vs. Smith, supra;
Teche Lines vs. Danforth, Miss., 12 S.2d 784,,, By http://www.oregontrackers.com
LikeLike
Edward Johnston
/ July 13, 2014The touchstone of Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable police searches and seizures is the requirement that such invasions be based on “probable cause”. DUNAWAY v. NEW YORK, 442 U.S. 200, 208, 60 L. Ed. 2d 824, 99 S. Ct. 2248 (1979). Those cases authorizing “seizures” of persons on lesser cause are narrowly drawn and carefully circumscribed. SEE ADAMS v. WILLIAMS, 407 U.S. 143, 32 L. Ed. 2d 612, 92 S. Ct. 1921 (1972); TERRY v. OHIO, 392 U.S. 1, 20 L. Ed. 2d 889, 88 S. Ct. 1868 (1968); STATE v. GLUCK, 83 Wn.2d 424, 518 P.2d 703 (1974).
WRIGHT v. MATTISON 18 HOW (1856)(9-0) The courts have concurred, it is believed, without an exception, in defining “color of title” to be that which in appearance is title, but which in reality is no title. yet a claim asserted under the provisions of such a deed is strictly acclaim under color of title, Hence, color of title, even under a void and worthless deed, has always been received as evidence that the person in possession claims adversely to all the world. Color of title may be made through conveyances, or bonds, or contracts, or bare possession under parol agreements. We can entertain no doubt in this case that the auditor’s deed to the purchaser at the tax sale is color of title in Woodward, in the true intent and meaning of the Statute, and without regard to its intrinsic worth as a title.
STONE v. UNITED STATES 69 U.S. (1865)(10-0) A patent is the highest evidence of title, and is conclusive as against the government, and all claiming under junior patents or titles, until it is set aside or annulled by some judicial tribunal. The patent is but evidence of a grant, and the officer who issues it acts ministerially and not judicially.
SANFORD v. SANFORD 139 U.S. (1891)(9-0) In ejectment the question always is who has the legal title for the demanded premises, not who ought to have it. In such cases the patent of the government issued upon the direction of the land department is unassailable. A Court of equity has jurisdiction in such a case to compel the transfer to the plaintiff of property which, but for such fraud and misrepresentation, would have been awarded to him, and of which he was thereby wrongfully deprived.
CHANDLER v. CALUMET & HECLA 149 U.S. (1893)(7-0) It is well settled that the state could have impeached the title thus conveyed to the canal company only by a bill in chancery to cancel or annul it, either for fraud on the part of the grantee, or mistake or misconstruction of the law on the part of its officers in issuing the patent. But whether there is any technical estoppel, in the ordinary sense, or not, it cannot be maintained that the state can issue two patents, at different dates to different parties, for the same land, so as to convey by the second patent a title superior to that acquired under the first patent. Neither can the second patentee, under such circumstances, in an action at law, be heard to impeach the prior patent for any fraud committed by the grantee against the state, or any mistake committed by its officers acting within the scope of their authority and having jurisdiction to act and to execute the conveyance sought to be impeached. Neither the state nor its subsequent patentee is in a position to cancel or annul the title which it had authority to make, and which it had previously conveyed to the canal company.
SARGEANT v. HERRICK 221 U.S. (1911)(9-0) It is apparent that the validity of the tax title depends upon the question whether the location of the warrant in 1857, without more, gave a right to a patent. Among the conditions upon compliance with which such a right depends, none has been deemed more essential than the payment of the purchase price, which, in this instance, could have been made in money or by a warrant like the one actually used.
UNITED STATES v. CREEK NATION 295 U.S. (1935)(9-0) They were intended from their inception to effect a change of ownership and were consummated by the issue of patents, the most accredited type of conveyance known to our law.
SUMMA CORP v. CALIFORNIA STATE EX REL. LANDS COM’N 466 U.S. (1984)(8-0) The final decree of the Board, or any patent issued under the Act, was also a conclusive adjudication of the rights of the claimant as against the United States, but not against the interests of third parties with superior titles. Finally, in UNITED STATES v. CORONADO BEACH CO. 255 U.S. (1921) The Court expressly rejected the Government’s argument, holding that the patent proceedings were conclusive on this issue, and could not be collaterally attacked by the Government. The necessary result of the Coronado Beach decision is that even “sovereign” claims such as those raised by the State of California in the present case must, like other claims, be asserted in the patent proceedings or be barred. These decisions control the outcome of this case. We hold that California cannot at this late date assert its public trust easement over petitioner’s property, when petitioner’s predecessors-in-interest had their interest confirmed without any mention of such an easement in proceedings taken pursuant to the Act of 1851. The interest claimed by California is one of such substantial magnitude that regardless of the fact that the claim is asserted by the State in its sovereign capacity, this interest, like the Indian claims made in BARKER and in UNITED STATES v. TITLE INS. & TRUST CO., must have been presented in the patent proceeding or be barred.Posted By Edward Johnston..
For real lawful Americans.
Allodial Title , those who are not under the illusion, they actually own their property because they hold the Allodial title ~
As a result of generations of constructive fraud per…petuated against the American people, and the peoples of the world, we’ve been conned into believing we are “owning” property, when in fact, and by law, we’re only in ” possession” of property utilizing it as a renter or tenant would. So long as we pay our rent (i.e., mortgages), get the licenses, pay the fees, have it insured, regulated, zoned and permitted, we can still remain in ” possession.”
An allodial title was bestowed, by law, upon the land with unalienability forever. No government, agency, bank or other sovereign power could place any lien, attachment or encumbrance on land held in an allodial state. An allodial title is derived from the original, federal land patent. “Land Patents” are still today the highest evidence of title and have never been refuted by any court of competent jurisdiction. (42) Read on and learn the facts
The following is an example of a case defining allodial title
All federal “Land Patents” flow from the treaty (e.g. The Oregon Treaty, 9 Stat. 869, 6/15/1846), therefore no state, private banking corporation or other federal agency can effectively challenge the superiority of title to land holders who have “perfected” their land patent. With an updated land patent brought forward in “Your Name” you can hold the rights and title to land as a sovereign, “state” Citizen. Be very clear that this is distinct from the equitable interest, title and deed. (43) Property tax attaches to the equitable title and interest in the property and real estate through a hidden federal lien. If the property and real estate is recorded with a deed (i.e., Trust Deed, Warranty Deed, Quit Claim Deed) at the County Recorders office, then it?s trust property executed and managed by the legal owners < the County, State and federal United States government corporation, and it?s principals/creditors.
Allodial title is defined as one that is free. [Stewart v. Chicago Title Ins. Co., 151 Ill. App. 3d 888 (Ill. App. Ct. 1987)]
Your defacto 1871 Elected senator to your city mayor and public servants peace officers, Sheriff, Judges, county clerks dog thief etc, non-for profits anyone on all grants
OregonTreaty of 1846 – Oregon Trackers
oregontrackers.com/OregonTreaty_of_1846.html Cached
… and all federal land patents of these states flow from the treaty and fall under the … THE OREGON TREATY, 1846 … Default Template for Easy Text To …
Please do your lawful research,
http://definitions.uslegal.com/a/allodial-title/
Peace and God Bless Jesus
OregonTreaty of 1846
OregonTreaty of 1846
oregontrackers.com
The Oregon Treaty of 1846 was an agreement with Great Britain that gave the U.S…. See More
LikeLike
Edward Johnston
/ July 13, 2014LikeLike
Truthseeker
/ July 15, 2014So by disconnecting the living from the dead you can then survive by what means in this world as it stands now? It is all good and well to point out the means by which we have arrived at the place where we reside now but what are the real time solutions to your interpretive dilemma?
LikeLike
realitybloger
/ July 16, 2014Solution means one and only one thing – the satisfaction and end of the contractual relationship. This is the only answer. The remedy to living as a person is to live as a man and never participate (contract) in the commercial ventures of man.
LikeLike
Adrian
/ July 16, 2014The root of all evils is called: RELIGION.
RELIGION is based on fiction.
A person is a fiction.
GOD is the big one.
The fiction of GOVERN-MENT is fooling every one now days.
The New Age Scam is the new old scam.
The living and the dead are two opposite concepts of reality.
America it’s been invaded by these plotters since the Big Bang,1776.
Most of seekers for answers get lost in the phony maze of CODS.
To codify means to hide.
Land title means Planet Earth.
No one owns the land man walks on it.
The Law of the land is simple: from dust to dust.
We live on the land,we’re part of it.
We are earthlings.
Just a few thoughts to clear the smoke.
LikeLike
Shane
/ August 4, 2014Seems like a lot of smoke Adam!!!
LikeLike
Brenda (surname) Teagarden
/ September 23, 2014Knowledge is power. So, how does one free oneself from the legal fiction?
LikeLike
realitybloger
/ September 24, 2014One stops using it, participating in it, and receiving benefits from it. How, though, is still the question of the day. Working on it.
LikeLike
Adrian
/ September 24, 2014A-pro-po of benefits,a lot of stuff we get it is a benefit but we pay for it in advance.
As for that legal fiction,a good phrase to use it is: this person does not exist.
A good maxim of law: what does not appear does not exist.
LikeLike
Giftoftruth
/ January 15, 2015Reblogged this on Giftoftruth United and commented:
A very good read for sovereigns and common law advocates; in peace
LikeLike
David Merrill
/ January 16, 2015I enjoy this interpretation – http://imageshack.com/a/img908/1025/Q6tQ56.jpg
LikeLike
Carolyn Benjamin
/ January 18, 2015Hello David Merrill,
I have found your quote posted above quite interesting. Please share the name of the book and where it can be found for download, purchace, etc. Or…does anyone else know? Help! Thank you very much.
LikeLike
David Merrill
/ January 20, 2015That is from The Holy Spirit’s Interpretation of the New Testament by Regina Dawn AKERS.
LikeLike
buddywebdesign
/ April 3, 2015trying to read but the background is too disturbing on my eyes. does anyone else have same problem
LikeLike
Inach Marbank
/ June 30, 2015One thing I like about the Books in the King James Bible: they are concise!
Greater substance is fashioned into lesser words.
I dislike when lesser substance is fashioned into greater words.
LikeLike
Inach Marbank
/ July 1, 2015Looks to me like a man or woman IS a god, according to The Book of Genesis:
“And the LORD God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:”
~ Genesis 3:22
But wait:
“Thou shalt have no other gods before me.”
~Exodus 20:3
Therefore, I think this #1 commandment means, in great part, the most High plans ARE TO come before our plans;
it’s meaning could apply elsewhere too…
LikeLike
realitybloger
/ July 10, 2015LORD God does not refer to “Jehovah” but to kings.
LikeLike
jody
/ March 28, 2018Lord God refers specifically to jehovah aka yhwh which is a pseudonym for lucifer .
you should stick to subjects you understand , if there are any !
LikeLike
realitybloger
/ April 6, 2018Please provide source here, instead of tagging my blog with your worthless adversarial graffiti.
LikeLike
cosmo pinciotti (@cosmopinciotti)
/ July 20, 2015“under God a man is…himself”? no way.
“you can only serve one master, not two… but also not zero”? freaky.
“you must acknowledge a higher authority than government, which government will only lawfully recognize as the biblical God.” what a surprise!
“you must choose between God and mammon.” your belief, not mine.
“you cannot serve God and mammon.” well, the Jesuits can…
a fictional character and a fiction of law – I think I will choose something with a little less fiction in it.
you’re doing a tremendous job. extremely helpful. nonetheless, understanding the nature of the complicity seems more promising to me than all the theology of corporatism.
“logic and reason must prevail here, or religion will form from even your own self-created doctrine.” keep that in mind, baby. “understanding just falls through the phenomena of the world endlessly.”
LikeLike
cosmo pinciotti (@cosmopinciotti)
/ July 21, 2015you’re the last one I want to offend or upset, Mr. Corporation Nation, and I’m just adding this because I’m not sure if you get what I mean by piety equals complicity, and why the notion of complicity relativizes the idea of a conspiratorial nature of our quasi-military, Saharasian “dominator culture”.
while you’re examining the rules of the games (“theology of corporatism”) I’m thinking about how it’s being played by everyone. that’s a difference, isn’t it. because “conspiracy reality theory” will only work out, you know, if you can convince a majority that there is, in fact, a conspiracy.
obviously, that’s your plan. in other words, you seem to believe the complicity was mainly based on misinformation. I’m not so sure about that. I mean, doesn’t the modernized feudal order allow many people to play king?
you see, if you wanted to dominate the world you wouldn’t have to care much about all those who believe they needed the guidance of experts. take this and look how academia backs up the “9/11” mega crime (as well as the crime strategy behind it) as one man more or less…
you’re not only up against a contemptuous legislation, but also against legions of gefühlskalte Fachidioten.
complicity theory owes a lot to George Carlin who clearly said, “fuck hope!” and I do. I take reality as it is like I welcome and accept any of my feels. this is how I understand science, this is how I understand psychedelics, this is how I think of religion. so “the sheep” basically want to be shepherded, spiritually and economically, and also the question who’s sheep and who shepherd gets, if you take a closer look, more complicated compared to what most conspiracy researchers assume.
maybe we should start to think about an alternative to the current legal system… do you know of some attempts along these lines perhaps?
LikeLike
realitybloger
/ July 23, 2015Though you wont like the answer, the Bible is an outline of both alternative. The alternative is always there, it’s called spiritual life, a life lived in only Nature. Only money (mammon) or God (Nature), but never both. The alternative is always there, for the legal (artificial) cannot exist without the reality (nature) to support it. Imagination can only come from men, and men can only come from and live in Nature (God). This is not religion, just self-evident truth. The Bible is not religion, it is a presentation of lifestyle choices.
LikeLike
cosmo pinciotti (@cosmopinciotti)
/ July 23, 2015thanks for having accepted my comment. I like that very much.
and I also like your answer. not so much because I agree with it, but because it broadens my horizons. this is always very welcome. I’m here to learn from you, not to try to seduce you to think in directions which I’m giving preference.
I can’t see how the biblical god could possibly represent anything real (besides the reality of wishful thinking) given its unnatural nature.
I mean, ultimately of course. I understand your point and its value, won’t deny or attack it. the only reason I can’t agree is its artificiality compared to older ancient wisdom. indigenous, shamanic wisdom. that I consider to be undistorted, free from piety politics (for the most part). pure and powerful. “everything comes down to the struggle between the network and the hierarchy.”
have you heard of “Saharasia” and “The Chalice and the Blade” yet?
something happened about 5000 years ago…
LikeLike
realitybloger
/ July 23, 2015You mistake God as a creation of the Bible. The word Jehovah is a verb, with the meaning of God, as the Supreme and Permanent Being, which is all of Creation, which is merely all of Nature, which is the action (verb) of all that is in Existence as reality. To deny God is to deny reality. Man can not create anything, only re-purpose God (nature) to his will. And he names (nouns) all things with a legal form so that he can control nature (God) though purely artificial (legal) means. Legal equals opposed to God (nature and natural law). It controls man (Creation of God) through legal personhood (personification of Creation) by the language arts, the terms of art (artifice), which is the law of persons.
The noun (name) of God as used by the corporate religions and their doctrines is not the verb of God. The noun is false… God in name only. And so the church acts as god in name only too. This is not what the Bible says.
And this is why, over and over, the Bible states in every chapter do not respect persons, take no oath to persons, respect no flattering titles, and be surety for no person. And yet that’s exactly what we have done. A person is a corporation, and the corporate churches and governments are persons.
To put it simply, God (Nature) exists without man, despite man’s designs against it, and without mine or yours belief. IT is all around you. It is only the artifice of legal things that blinds us from God’s Nature. If you read the Bible, study its meanings by studying its words, you will find like I have that you are a fool for dismissing the Bible, which is the highest law in all nations. It is vested as the law in the Crown. It is the only remedy and solution, which is why they call christ the redeemer.
Lastly, none of this is religious. Only the church is religion. The scriptures are nothing but ancient knowledge, not original, and totally self-evident.
But you can believe whatever opinion you wish to. Due diligence is not for everyone…
-Clint-
LikeLike
cosmo pinciotti (@cosmopinciotti)
/ July 24, 2015you’re saying there is no God in the Bible, but just another word for nature? wouldn’t that be great! as if there was no Loyola in “citizen” (loyalty): citizen another word for freedom…
I understand all that, Clint, thank you, but you behave as if the story of Jehova, this philosophy of god, the biblical code would define language. why do you think that that was appropriate? because of the mainstream? for most people believe what most people believe? that would be the point of pietology, that truth is political, not absolute. for you can believe whatever you want to.
or in your words: “religion permeates throughout all arts, from science to government.”
in my opinion, an excellent description of piety theory that emphasizes why it’s taboo.
you seem to believe you weren’t religious about the words and terms being used. I’d be glad if that was the case. but do you really use these “testaments” just as a dictionary? if so a spiritual lifestyle would have nothing to do with scriptures… the second thing making me sceptical in this regard: you haven’t yet internalized (the magnitude of) the almighty conversational divide coming from cognition itself.
or to put it more succinctly, romantic notions are none of your business. they aren’t integrated into your thinking, theorizing, explanations. you’re fighting them in an abstract way, without explicitly going into them.
you’re only practicing diligence within the realm of definitions. the holy books of corporatism in the name of the books of salvationism… and don’t get me wrong, it’s stunning and right on target that and how you do it. due diligence however does not automatically lead to effective thorough thinking.
do you believe you can make understandable why and how stories became religion, religion a church, churches corporations and corporations states just by decoding machtpolitik?
if the Bible, as you say, would be the (suppressed) “highest law in all nations” as sort of “the nature’s dictionary”, why the personality cult and all the encryption that are so typical for hierarchical rulership?
piety is the key. and you won’t reveal the hidden principle of the heart by the rectification of (legal) language alone (be it the Bible, be it the law). the Bible is only legit due to imposed traditional belief. besides its immense linguistic ugliness (another parallel between both theologies) the main reason why I cannot support one single word or idea related to it, sorry. I’ll listen to everything you’re going to find out, but I’m not giving these texts any future.
wouldn’t it make a lot much easier if we separated nature from hellboy (Jesus)? the God who is none, actually (according to you) but has been made one by priests, kings, masons, lawyers, politicians, “scientists”… why not end this outrageous “abuse” for the sake of clarity, man? isn’t the legal concept of authority based on the spiritual concept of creation? let’s think bigger and more to the point where it matters, that’s all I’m saying. your focus on semantics is crucial and enlightening, it also feels limited though.
LikeLike
realitybloger
/ August 4, 2015I appreciate your comments, but bear in mind that I have a massive tome of research (a book) yet unreleased and that trying to define terms in comment-sized bits is only going to lead to endless questions due to what appears to be incomplete thoughts by myself. I suggest, if you are truly interested, that you might want to wait a couple of months (I hope) until that is complete, for it integrates all this into one diagram.
-Clint-
LikeLike
cosmo pinciotti (@cosmopinciotti)
/ July 24, 2015I think you’re trapped in a way. you want to oppose the reality of religion by showing it’s all just grammatical trickery. the Corporation Nation in about the same way as the Messiah… it’s not. I mean, sure, a lot of it is, yes, but also a lot of it is something else. the “religion” that permeates throughout all arts is in fact the essence of how we do business. spiritually as well as physically. and the language of this essence – the truth of business, or also of success, if you will – is what interests me, and that directly. for me, it’s the language of the pious mind.
legal and traditional terms do cover the area of belief for the most part, but what can they say about intuition? this is how I understand mentality: a feedback mechanism between intuition and beliefs. all sorts of beliefs, especially the deep-seated. as an individual (heart) or a collective, a society (government). and my heart tells me that the Bible was the last book I would use to describe nature. in my mind, God’s the clear opposite of it. that may be wrong if it’s true what you’re saying – the original ghost of the Scriptures had nothing to do with “Saharasian”, “dominator” social principles or piety politics at all – but, you’ve thousands of years of cultural reality with overwhelming political weight that need to be understood properly.
like Nietzsche, I prefer abstractions that can be felt.
because piety politics is based on estrangement.
so I’m making a clear cut not only with the Bible, but any all too abstract special theories. for the purpose of a kind of unified theory about western thinking resp. business from a viewpoint of a complicity researcher.
elitists rule by semantic precision, “semantic superiority”, semantic betrayal… no doubt about it. just that you can’t say much about movitations by not addressing them directly. the cold opportunism of academics, for instance, or the general professional servile spirit. there are more languages besides language.
LikeLike
realitybloger
/ August 4, 2015Just remember… all the tyranny in the Bible was by men claiming to be gods, vicars, lords, heirs, etc. Nature (evidence of Creation, of God) cannot possibly, intentionally, harm you, nor should God be personified into a tyrannical or omnipitent man (king), which is what the story of Caesar (seizure/seisen) and Jesus is, to anthropomorphize God into man-form as all ancient writers did, from Plato to Aristotle, in order to make parables and share knowledge, such as Plato’s Cave. The slaves are fiction, as is the cave. The moral of the story is all that matters, not the reality of the characters. And the moral of the Bible is that when man claim godhead status, power corrupts, so stick with what nature provides and do not enter into personhood, flattering titles, surety, etc, just as is written. It’s an anti-legal book, that powerful men use to enslave by positively using the tools the Bible tells you to avoid. Only man can harm man, nature only gives back to man what man does unto it, as does man. Thus, God does no harm but what God’s creation of man does to himself, and allows his fellow man to do to nature. In my estimation, the word god refers to man as lord god up to 90% of the Bible, and always as an example (story) of the legal traps set by men to rule.
If you take the Bible literally in any way, you loose the whole point. Even Jesus chastises his followers for their literal translations of his parables.
-Clint-
LikeLike
jim
/ September 27, 2016How about the Royal Law? The Authorized King James Bible is the law book that binds the Queen, making her just another living soul and our equal under the law.
LikeLike
realitybloger
/ September 28, 2016Exactly. Problem is, no-one seems to realize its the highest law.
LikeLike
intransit2012
/ May 27, 2023No, the highest law is not the man-made rules from the bible but all that is held in Divine law WITHIN. The Soul is the real You, not the human body, as the human body is the physical material form the soul (the real You) is having physical experiences in earth’s (Gaia, is also a living soul, in earth form) lower energies.
LikeLike
Jane Pierce
/ March 27, 2016ceded not seeded 😉
LikeLike
Josh Daniel
/ August 16, 2017Thankyou so much for this…. I was a Christian for 32 years… You just provided me with that aha moment… So much was unlearned in your post.. I was born again.
Thankyou so much!!
LikeLike
realitybloger
/ August 17, 2017Glad to be of service…
I hope you will also download my book, free, at STRAWMANSTORY.INFO
LikeLike
jody
/ March 28, 2018This paragraph tells me you are totally clueless to the spirit realms!Genius – n. [Latin from the root of gigno; Gr. to beget.] 1. Among the ancients, a good or evil spirit or demon supposed to preside over a man’s destiny in life, that is, to direct his birth and actions and be his guard and guide; a tutelary deity; the ruling and protecting power of men, places or things. This seems to be merely a personification or deification of the particular structure or bent of mind which a man receives from nature, which is the primary signification of the word. 2. The peculiar structure of mind which is given by nature to an individual, or that disposition or bent of mind which is peculiar to every man, and which qualifies him for a particular employment; a particular natural talent or aptitude of mind for a particular study or course of life; as a genius for history, for poetry or painting. 3. Strength of mind; uncommon powers of intellect, particularly the power of invention. In this sense we say, Homer was a man of genius. Hence, 4. A man endowed with uncommon vigor of mind; a man of superior intellectual faculties. Shakespeare was a rare-genius. (Webster’s 1828)
LikeLike
realitybloger
/ April 6, 2018That’s a dictionary definition, not my writing. So take it up with Webster. LOL!
Not too bright, are you?
LikeLike
Bob Johnson
/ December 11, 2018Extraordinary. I have been studying this my whole life and you spelled it out so it all makes sense. Step one quitclaim the surname? Is my Christian name just first or first and middle? A declaration of civil death acknowledging Yahuah as my higher power ….who is this filed with? I have heard the land pattent office the civil court? Then no longer participate in the systems ? Correct ?
LikeLike
realitybloger
/ December 21, 2018Greetings Bob… I suggest the last chapter of my book for what a land patent and allodial/perfect title is and who qualifies for it (not us).
As for the Christian name, I often find that the words themselves when defined tell the whole of the story, like a connect the dots game. Hope this helps:
CHRISTIAN-NAME – noun – The name given in baptism, as distinct from the gentilitious or surname. (Webs1828)
GENTILITIOUS – adjective – [Latin gentilitius, from gens.] 1. Peculiar to a people or nation; national. 2. Hereditary; entailed on a family. (Webs1828)
SURNAME – noun – [Latin super and nomen.] 1. An additional name; a name or appellation added to the baptismal or christian name, and which becomes a family name. Surnames, with us, originally designated occupation, estate, place of residence, or some particular thing or event that related to the person. Thus William Rufus or red; Edmund Ironsides; Robert Smith, or the smith; William Turner. 2. An appellation added to the original name. My surname Coriolanus. – verb transitive – To name or call by an appellation added to the original name. Another shall subscribe with his hand unto the Lord, and surname himself by the name of Israel. Isaiah 44:5. And Simon he surnamed Peter. Mark 3:16. (Webs1828)
Strong’s #G907 – baptizō – “to dip repeatedly, to immerse, to submerge (of vessels sunk), to cleanse by dipping or submerging, to wash, to make clean with water, to wash one’s self, bathe, to overwhelm”
“Note on Baptism in Ac. Baptism in water (such as John’s) is distinguished from baptism with the Holy Spirit (i. 5, etc.). Those who receive the latter (spirit), however, may also be baptized in water (cf. xi. 16 with x. 47); and there is one example of people who had previously received John’s baptism receiving Christian baptism as a preliminary to receiving the Spirit (xix. 3 ff.). John’s was a baptism of repentance (xiii. 24; xix. 4), as was also Christian baptism (ii. 38), but as John’s pointed forward to Jesus (xix. 4), it became obsolete when He came. Christian baptism followed faith in the Lord Jesus (xvi. 31 ff.); it was associated with His name (ii. 38; viii. 16, etc.), which was invoked by the person baptized (xxii. 16); it signified the remission (ii. 38) or washing away of sins (xxii. 16); sometimes it preceded (ii. 38; viii. 15 ff.; xix. 5), sometimes followed (x. 47 f.) the receiving of the Spirit.” (F. F. Bruce. The Acts of the Apostles [Greek Text Commentary], London: Tyndale, 1952, p. 98, n. 1.) This word should not be confused with baptô (911). The clearest example that shows the meaning of baptizo is a text from the Greek poet and physician Nicander, who lived about 200 B.C. It is a recipe for making pickles and is helpful because it uses both words. Nicander says that in order to make a pickle, the vegetable should first be ‘dipped’ (baptô) into boiling water and then ‘baptised’ (baptizô) in the vinegar solution. Both verbs concern the immersing of vegetables in a solution. But the first is temporary. The second, the act of baptising the vegetable, produces a permanent change.”
From my book:
The given, first, christian, or fore-name is also referred to as the “personal name.” This is a freely given gift, bestowed only in Nature without permission, license, or registration. It requires conscious thought and choice by the parents. Alone, it is also too ambiguous to be classified as a nomenclature (word-group) that describes any type of legal entity (e.g., a fictional persona). Thus the first name is a creation and term of Nature (Origin).
The family, last, or sur-name is also referred to as the “gentile name.” Another word for gentile is common, or goyim, as a heathen worshiper of the false gods of the nations in which that admixed “full name” is registered. This is only the inherited name, assumed and contracted (like a dis-ease) from the status of the parent. The parent need not consider or choose this last name (word), for it is automatically passed to each new subject of the gods of the nations according to the status it re-presents the parents in. But the last or surname alone is not considered as a personal name. Thus the surname is a creation and term of law (fiction).
However, when the first (personal/Self) name is placed together with the last (gentile/common/goyim) name as one word-group that describes an incorporated “individual” person as a fiction of law, then the full name is also considered as the personal name of a legal entity, also called as a “natural person.” But this word personal, here used in artificial description of the full name in fiction, is the legal version of the word, whereas the term personal as used for only the first, God-given gift-of-Nature name refers to the unblemished blood and spirit. In the full (admixed) name, we act in the person (incorporation) of another, and thus we act personally in this legal sense. We act artificially as a person not our own, not as our actual Self. But with that first, christian name only, we operate personally as our own Self. In other words, the given (christian) name alone is not a personification of self, it is the actual or Real Self. The full name, however, represents that same man pretending to be as a fictional character in an impersonal, legal name of the state, for to carry the last name of another requires a contractual relationship of that dis-ease and burden with its owner. And so the man must appear as the nomenclature (word-group) that makes up that in-corporation of first and last names, as the property of and under the law of another. It is not dis-similar to the employer/employee relationship, the employee (agent) acting on behalf of his employer (principal). The person is movable land, as chattel, and the principality that makes the law of the land thus makes the law of the legal person, ordaining that law to be the highest law in the fictional “land” (jurisdiction) of the territory of the nation.
—=—
“An addition [to a name] proves or shows minority or inferiority.”
—Additio probat minoritatem. (Black4)
—=—
ADD – To unite; attach; annex; join. (Black4)
ADDITIONAL – This term embraces the idea of joining or uniting one thing to another, so as thereby to form one aggregate. (Black4)
AGGREGATE – Entire number, sum, mass, or quantity of something; amount; complete whole, and one provision under will may be the aggregate if there are no more units to fall into that class. Composed of several; consisting of many persons united together; a combined whole. (Black4)
LEGAL NAME – The name officially given and recorded on one’s birth certificate. A legally recognized name. (Black2)
NAME – The designation of an individual person, or of a firm or corporation. A person’s “name” consists of one or more Christian or given names and one surname or family name. It is the distinctive characterization in words by which one is known and distinguished from others, and description, or abbreviation, is not the equivalent of a “name.” Custom gives one his father’s family name, and such praenomina as his parents choose to put before it, but this is only general rule, from which individual may depart, if he choose. As to the history of Christian names and surnames and their use and relative importance in law, see In re Snook, 2 Hilt., N.Y., 566. (Snook case will be covered later.) (Black4)
NAME AND ARMS CLAUSE – The popular name in English law for the clause, sometimes inserted in a will or settlement by which property is given to a person, for the purpose of imposing on him the condition that he shall assume the surname and arms of the testator or settlor, with a direction that, if he neglects to assume or discontinues the use of them, the estate shall devolve on the next person in remainder, and a provision for preserving contingent remainders. (Black4)
NAM – In old English law, a distress or seizure of chattels. As a Latin conjunction, for; because. Often used by the old writers in introducing the quotation of a Latin maxim. (Black4)
NAAM – Saxon. The attaching or taking of movable goods and chattels, called “vif” or “mort” according as the chattels were living or dead. Termes de la Ley (terms of art). (Black4)
NAMARE – L. Latin. In old records, to take, seize or distrain. (Black4)
NAMATIO – L. Latin. In old English and Scotch law, a distraining or taking of a distress; an impounding. (Black4)
DISTRICT – noun – [Latin, to press hard, to bind. See Distrain.] 1. Properly, a limited extent of country; a circuit within which power, right or authority may be exercised, and to which it is restrained; a word applicable to any portion of land or country, or to any part of a city or town, which is defined by law or agreement. A governor, a prefect, or a judge may have his district… (Webs1828)
DISTRAIN – verb transitive – [Latin dis and stringo. See Strain. Blackstone writes distrein.] 1. To seize for debt; to take a personal chatel from the possession of a wrong-doer into the possession of the injured party, to satisfy a demand, or compel the performance of a duty; as, to distrain goods from rent, or for an amercement. 2. To rend; to tear. – verb intransitive – To make seizure of goods. On whom I cannot distrain for debt. For neglecting to do suit to the lords court, or other personal service, the lord may distrain of common right. [In this phrase however some word seems to be understood; as, to distrain goods.] (Webs1828)
SEIZED – pp – Suddenly caught or grasped; taken by force; invaded suddenly; taken possession of; fastened with a cord; having possession. (Webs1828)
SEZIN – noun – 1. In law, possession. Seizin is of two sorts, seizin in deed or fact, and seizin in law. Seizin in fact or deed, is actual or corporal possession; seizin in law, is when something is done in which the law accounts possession or seizin, as enrollment, or when lands decend to an heir, but he has not yet entered on them. In this case, the law considers the heir as seized of the estate, and the person who wrongfully enters on the land is accounted a disseizor. 2. The act of taking possession. [Not used except in law.] 3. The thing possessed; possession. Livery of seizin. [See Livery.] Primer of seizin. [See Primer.] (Webs1828)
ENROLLMENT – The act of putting upon a roll. A record made. In English law. The registering or entering on the rolls of chancery, king’s bench, common pleas, or exchequer, or by the clerk of the peace in the records of the quarter sessions, of any lawful act; as a recognizance, a deed of bargain and sale, and the like. (Black4)
STATISTIC, STATISTICAL – adjective – [from state or statist.] Pertaining to the state of society, the condition of the people, their economy, their property and resources. (Webs1828)
VITAL STATISTICS – The information that is kept on births, deaths, Marriages, divorces, longevity, etc., that is kept by public authorities for determining public utilities, etc. (Black2)
From my book:
—=—
“And it came to pass in those days, that there went out a decree from Caesar (#G2541) Augustus, that all the world should be taxed (#G583).”
—Luke 2:1, KJB
—=—
“And all went to be taxed (#G583), every one into his own city.”
—Luke 2:3, KJB
—=—
Heading back to Strong’s Concordance and Thayer’s Greek Lexicon, we again see the difference between the Bible (Higher) language and the common, vulgar tongue of the mass of illiterates speaking dog-Latin. For to be “taxed” is not merely the exaction and extortion of money as we politically consider it. Tax is certainly not just the way it is nor as certain as death (and taxes). Only public-minded, non compos mentis slaves think in this defeatist way, which is why most common citizenships pay their taxes. But to be taxed is much, much more…
G583 – “Taxed” – apographō
From ἀπό (G575), meaning: from, of, out of, for, off, by, at, in, since, on, etc…
And γράφω (G1125), meaning: write, writing, describe.
1. To write off, copy (from some pattern) 2. To enter in a register or records
1. Specifically, to enter in public records the names of men, their property and income 2. To enroll
Quoting further from Thayer’s Greek Lexicon:
“apographō…To have one’s self registered, to enroll one’s self… those whose names are inscribed in the heavenly register, Hebrews 12:23 (the reference is to the dead already received into the heavenly city, the figure being drawn from civil communities on earth, whose citizens are enrolled in a register).”
—=—
Does that answer your question, Bob?
-Clint
LikeLike
happyheart
/ January 9, 2020Thank you for sharing all that you’ve concluded thus far from your intense research. It’s quite an immense body of work you’ve put up on your blog. It has definitely made me reconsider the Bible. TPTB seem to play by a set of rules that require them to tell us what they are up to with all sorts of truths hidden in plain sight. I’m going to give the King James Version an honest look with your discovered definitions in mind.
I’ve been trying to find truth for 7 years. My intuition told me that Truth = God and
that anyone who is really trying to find truth will make progress. No one man will be all knowing like our Creator but our efforts will not be in vain. Mine haven’t been in vain. Or I would have given up after all this time. And as frustrating as it can be to put so much time in researching and never be finished I still am committed to it because I feel I am getting closer to God and God knows my intentions are sincere.
For those who don’t think it’s worth the effort to search for truth (search for God) and just BELIEVE because “you’ll never really KNOW anything for sure” I say I feel sorry for you because KNOWING God is possible and KNOWING Truth is knowing God. BELIEVING is a copout that’s comfortable and convenient. God hasn’t changed and is not hiding from us. He wants us to know the wonderous Law of Nature and be fulfilled living within it. It’s man that has hidden God from us along with our true history and destiny.
And as disappointing as it can be to see people running around talking like programmed parrots about what I now consider trivial things I realize that my world has completely changed over the last 7 years because of people who opened my mind to all the fiction I was immersed in and got me searching for answers.
Don’t ever give up Clint. You really do make a big difference. Your mind is a treasure trove.
And I have only just begun reading your blog.
Your CAFR youtubes are fantastic. I can’t believe people would ask you to change anything about them in the comments.
LikeLike
realitybloger
/ January 12, 2020Thanks you for your inspiring words.
-Clint
LikeLike
You Matter (@altanswer)
/ May 20, 2020I originally came across Daniel and Christian Remedy in Law. Clint we have studied this very deeply and would like to ask where we might send notices to inform the correct signing authority that we recognise the fraud and want our foundation documents amending. Will we need a living will and/or any other paperwork to be able to operate in the public but live in the private?
LikeLike
realitybloger
/ May 30, 2020Paperwork? Is paperwork an act of God? Are you? Do you need paperwork to exist, or is your existence a self-evident Truth. What proofs of man does life possibly need to Exist.
Paperwork is what got you into this mess. Only an end to paperwork (contract) is what will get you out.
But more than this, if you continue to respect what that paperwork represents (a legal person/status) then you can never be free of it’s fictional grasp.
Remember who/what is the redeemer. It aint ink on paper. When you are ready, or when the time comes that you finally have to choose sides, stop believing in fiction and live in Truth and under Its Law.
That’s the only advice you’ll ever hear from me on the subject of paperwork.
Live, don’t operate.
-Clint
LikeLike