My Life: The End Of A Journey


To my dear friends and faithful readers…

The time has come that, at least for now and the near future, I am retiring this blog. It will not be actively contributed to anymore by myself. Now, please allow me to explain why.

I feel that I have reached the end of this particular journey. And though my future path remains unclear as of this moment, I have faith that this past journey and the heartbreak it has caused me was not only necessary, but that it will also lead myself and perhaps others to a better place. I am in these strange days at a conscious fork in the road, under what some may call technologically (artfully) the final days of whatever life as we have pretended to know and accept it is.

The following is literally a walkthrough of my time on this earth as an activist turned writer, filmmaker, and radio guest and host. Some of the links provided below have likely not been seen by most of my readers, a personal history lost in the shit-pile of Youtube feces and tabloid nonsense. This is my history (his story) as publicly recored, for better and for worse, and as it remains in that digital ether like the story of a child growing up and out of his own societal, political, and religious delusions.

My future, my path, depends on you. I will either be able to print my life’s work, my new books, or I will not. I will either use those reference books as my tool or I will not. And as for myself, I will either fade away into the obscurity we were birthed into or I will overcome it. Honestly, this option to fade away (or burning out) sounds like a much easier path right about now. And so I am posting here what may very well be my last post on this blog. I am posting here my life story as an activist, writer, filmmaker, radio show host, and guerrilla journalist, all of which I have funded out of my own already empty pockets.

And so Iam asking you the reader, watcher, and listener just what my work has been worth to you?

There are currently 1861 subscribers to this blog. It receives an average of between 500-700 readers per day that click on one of 241 published posts representing uncountable hours of research. A total of 1,422,654 views have occurred over this blogs 7 year history, all of them without charge and certainly without profit and gain for the benefit of their author (figures as of Aug-01-2016). And so I am asking, for the second and last time, that my readers support this tome of research and work by donating to my cause. All donations will be applied solely towards the private printing of my books. If every subscriber donated just $10 today I would reach my goal instantly.

But I have nothing left to offer and certainly nothing to sell, except what I have already given away for free and what I will continue to offer freely in the future. The book is already posted for free download here: StrawmanStory.info, with Volume II soon to follow and be added to the first.

Please donate (click) here:

Make a Donation Button

Or my P. O. Box is at:

Clint Richardson
1192 East Draper Parkway #124
Draper, Ut 84020

–=–

If you would like a paperback copy of the book, please follow the instructions at the StrawmanStory.info home page, as this would be a purely private, non-commercial exchange.

Here, let me attempt to answer the question as to why  you should make a donation.

I can only walk you through my story here, and can only offer my charitable life’s work and research below as the answer to that question. And so below is my personal walkthrough of just that.

I have poured my heart and soul into ten years of dedicated, full-time research, media, and activism, as is evidenced by this extensive blog. I have given the fruit of my labors freely without exception or expectation. I have suffered ridicule and fallacious personal attacks on my character by cowardly persons unknown, unseen, and unmet, and by those who hide behind false names and flattering avatars and titles for reasons I cannot fathom; a paid and usefully unpaid idiocy. I lost one email account and am apparently losing current emails into the nothingness of the cloud. I have had strikingly unreasonable rebukes, a strange absence of searchable content on search engines like Google, and just all around opposition (controlled and otherwise) for telling the untainted Truth that very few want or are capable of hearing. Though few seem to be seeking healthy debate or discussion, many are willing to throw stones and cause stumbling blocks from afar. I suppose this has become the American way, wearing our ignorance like a badge of courage. Hell, no government (mind control) is needed when we are each others own stumbling blocks and worst enemies.

Much of what I had uncovered years ago is now being recognized, propagandized, and institutionalized through an obfuscating normalization process. For instead of being outrightly hushed, it is being brought into public light slowly, as entertainment, so as to protect the pharmaceutical and medical industries that are ultimately responsible for spreading all modern disease through various forms of inoculation, including vaccination.

For instance:

–=–

“Scientists might finally understand
how prions spread infectious brain disease

“After decades of research, scientists think they finally know what turns prions – healthy proteins inside our brains – into the infectious, virus-like pathogens that cause ‘mad cow’ disease, and have also been linked to Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s

Link: http://www.sciencealert.com/scientists-might-finally-understand-how-prions-become-so-dangerous

–=–

In Truth, this information has been known for decades, intentionally buried by drug companies under actuarial profit projections and insurance matrixes without responsible or even cautious recall. The careless results of such insured and government-approved and licensed irresponsibility (malpractice insurance) certainly could have been avoided if it were not for the religious worship of vaccination and other medical nightmares, which purposefully deliver cross-species infection and the RNA-based DNA reprogramming that leads to cancers and so many other diseases through such unnatural inoculations. Even this article is chalk full of misleading statements, never putting the blame upon the pharmaceutical companies that have hand delivered most modern diseases directly into our veins through the monetarily induced and brainwashed, licensed nurses and doctors that prescribe them, posing as if wasps stinging their prey to deliver their own burden of poisons and parasites.

Pulitzer Prize winner Richard Rhodes warned us in the 1980’s with his book “Deadly Feasts” about this modern, government and medically-induced plague, along with Patrick Jordan and myself (2011-12) intimately exposing it in this new century with 1,000’s of hours of primary research and radio shows on the subject. The amount of suffering that could have been and still can be averted is not qualifiable in blogosphere soundbites. This open secret is kept merely to protect the deliverers of these infectious prions and their profitable “big pharma” corporations, even as most modern “dementia” type dis-ease has in fact been shown to be some form of prion dis-ease as an otherwise impossible cross-species infection. They actually call this “prion misfolding,” which is just another word for “evolution” (the unfolding of man and beast). But who would listen to a lowly old blogger and an obscure couple of unpublished authors that voluntarily sacrificed their entire livelihoods to literally save the population from its own ignorant trust in flatteringly titled, legal “doctors” and the regulatory agencies of government that “educate” and license them in their practice of spreading disease through professional prescription?

Evolution, or as polio vaccine inventor Jonas Salk called it, The Unfolding Of Man, is not merely some random act of Nature. It is a purposeful infection (by a penetrating needle sting) that causes healthy cells to be mis-folded into whatever RNA structure is infecting and reprogramming its functionality and form. This evolution is often called cancerous growth. For instance, the scrapie prion of sheep causes mad-cow disease in cattle, as the genetic programming of the sheep prion attempts to reprogram the specifically and proprietarily naturally programmed cow prion, evolving  it and thus causing the symptoms of doctor and drug-induced evolution. This process is called prion misfolding, and foreign prions (all prions of all other species) are called “infectious” for this reason, as they attach to healthy, proprietary (host) prions and literally evolve (unfold) them into copies of their foreignly programed selves.

I do not use this word evolution lightly. This is not a sophomoric religious or scientific debate. This is the real deal. The evil elements in this world have found a way to literally evolve us through these deadly and pretended-to-be incurable, infectious prions. This is the weaponization of the very design of life itself, the purposeful altering of prion proteins that are designed to, by their own source of nature and in a foundational way, protect us from so many special diseases, including most forms of cancer. But these diseases can only happen in man and beast when purposeful cross-species contamination takes place, and only man can contemplate and manufacture such evil in the name of unnatural, unspiritual “science” and “medicine.”

EVOLUTION – noun – [Latin evolutio.] The act of unfolding or unrolling1. series of things unrolled or unfolded; as the evolution of ages… 4. In military tactics, the doubling of ranks or files, wheeling, countermarching or other motion by which the disposition of troops is changedin order to attack or defend with more advantageor to occupy a different post.

EVOLVE – verb transitive – evolv’. [Latin evolvoe and volvoto roll; Eng. to wallow.] 1. To unfoldto open and expand. The animal soul sooner evolves itself to its full orb and extent than the human soul. 2. To throw out; to emit. – verb intransitive – To open itselfto disclose itself.

EVOLVING – participle present tense – Unfoldingexpandingemitting.

EVOLUTE – noun – An original curve from which another curve is describedthe origin of the evolent.

EVOLVENT – noun – In geometry, a curve formed by the evolution of another curvethe curve described from the evolute.

EVOLVED – participle passive – Unfoldedopenedexpandedemitted.

–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language

–=–

Jonas Salk, inventor of the injectable, inactivated live-virus polio vaccine that spread so much infectious disease (including polio) around the world due to the un-filterable protein (infectious prion) and DNA strands of Simean Monkey Virus #40 (SV-40) and other infectious cancer viruses mixed with other biological-unfolding agents, later released a selection of very telling books based on his research into this purposeful evolution of life, some of those titles being “Man Unfolding” and “Infectious Molecules and Human Disease.

The actual history of his ilk’s work is still underreported and ignored as fools line up in droves to accept their devil-in-a-white-coat’s inoculative tribute from nurses that know not the first thing about these pharmaceutical weapons they are paid to deliver under licensure by those syndicalist, organized crime dealers of purchased degrees and diplomas.

–=–

“Official data shows that large scale vaccination has failed to obtain any significant improvement of the diseases against which they were supposed to provide protection.”

–Dr. Albert B. Sabin, inventer of oral or “sugar cube” polio vaccine

–=–

“…nearly all polio outbreaks since 1961 were caused by the oral polio vaccine.”

–Jonas Salk, inventor of the first polio vaccine,
testimony before a Senate subcommittee 

–=–

“Many here voice a silent view that the Salk and Sabin Polio Vaccines, being made from monkey kidney tissue, has been directly responsible for the major increase in leukaemia in this country.”

–Dr. F. Klenner, MD

–=–

“90% of polio cases were eliminated from statistics by health authorities’ redefinition of the disease when the vaccine was introduced, while in reality the Salk vaccine was continuing to cause paralytic polio in several countries at a time when there were no epidemics being caused by the wild virus.

–Dr. Viera Scheibner, Ph.D.

–=–

“Not only did the cases of polio increase substantially after mandatory vaccinations (a 50% increase from 1957 to 1958, and an 80% increase from 1958 to 1959), but the statistics were manipulated by the Public Health Service to give the opposite impression.”

–1962 U.S. Congressional hearings, excerpt of the testimony of Dr. Bernard Greenberg, Head of the Dept. of Biostatistics for the University of North Carolina School of Public Health

–=–

“We now know that chronic fatigue syndrome (myalgic encephalomyelitis in England) is not a new disease, but simply an ‘aborted form’ of the more serious paralytic polio

That the sustained use of polio vaccines for over 40 years has resulted in: 

at least 72 viral strains that can cause polio-like diseases…”

Vaccinations caused: 

“…the CHANGING of polio rather than the elimination of it.”

–Dr. William C. Douglas, M.D., Editor of the medical newsletter “Second Opinion”

–=–

“[Conservatively] About 54 percent of children lamed as a result of poliomyelitis had received three doses of oral polio vaccine before the onset of paralysis.”

–Poliomyelitis trends in Pondicherry, South India, 1989-91, from the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health [London], vol. 51, no. 4, August 1997, pages 443-48

–=–

Vaccines caused substantial increases in polio after years of steady declines, and they are the sole cause of new polio cases in the U.S. today.”

–Alan Phillips, independent investigator and writer on vaccine risks and alternatives, from a report published in the April 1996 edition of “Wildfire Magazine”

–=–

I recently spoke of this medically induced evolutionary processing of the human race in an interview…

Link: https://corporationnationradioarchives.wordpress.com/2016/08/03/clint-on-btfc-this-morning/

The vaccine for any dis-ease offers no positive healing factor, instead merely presenting an evolution or devolution of that dis-ease’s regiment of symptoms. As Patrick Jordan points out, to cure is to preserve, not to heal. We cure dead animals for later consumption by applying salt or other chemicals. We cure hay as well with salts, preventing its natural petrification but never allowing it to grow as if it were not already attacked and killed  at its roots, left to a slow, decomposing death. But this is not healing, for the zombie dead that we are being turned into simply cannot be healed, only preserved (cured).

And though no vaccine manufacturer has ever made any claim or proven to “cure” any disease through vaccination, one must consider that zombies must also be cured so that their dying, petrifying bodies do not fall apart by the man-made diseases that caused their inconvenient disposition. We are certainly being cured in this villainous sense by these pharmaceutical corporations, for to alter the very DNA structure of man and beast, the symptoms of such man-made evolutionary changes must be managed. The body must be made to persevere through its forced alteration into that which is incompatible with Nature. It must be supplemented with poisons and chemical polymers and compounds that are otherwise unusable to the properly folded (un-evolved) man. We are as pieces of patented, copyrighted art being kept by museum curators, our altered and evolved genes continuously re-registered as government property, even as we mutate exponentially into our unwitting, transhumanist future.

For Charles Darwin, we find the term “descent” used in place of evolution in his first offering of “The Descent of Man” (1871), just one year before his “Origin of Species” attempted to fulfill the anti-theist’s wet dream.

It is ironic that this very tool of genetic and unique, non-nucleatoid protein manipulation that is the foreign (infectious) prion actually proves that evolution is quite naturally impossible in the way that Darwin theorized, and that only the adversarial (evil) and artful designs of the sciences of man may forcibly alter the very fundamental designs of Nature (God). The protective element of our natural, inheritable, healthy prion structure is the best and most sound evidence against Darwin’s origin of species argument. We simply cannot tolerate the cells of other species in our bodies, for their very RNA script and programming is diametrically opposed to our own. Hell, we can barley survive our own blood-types being crossed in normal reproduction without man’s interference though pharmacopeia to deaden our immune system that registers a forming baby of a foreign human blood-type as a foreign infection to be destroyed as a systematic dis-ease. Thus, to even suggest this foolish evolutionary theory as sound when considering this modern prion plague is outlandishly ridiculous, for infectious prions to humans are merely the healthy, normally occurring prions of other species. To each species lies its own origins. And to claim knowledge of those origins is only the false imaginations of idolatrous, want-to-be gods.

One of the most spiritual aspects and teachings of the Bible is simply that man can never know the origins of that which is his or any other source of True Existence. This humbling, self-evident knowledge is what drives insane men on such foolish errands in the flattering title of “science.” But the only Truth is that we will never know. We are not supposed to know. We are only supposed to live as we were intended to and by the very protective Design Nature allows. To question the integrity of that design and to seek improvement upon it is the greatest folly of man, who’s modern consciousness seeks only advancement and growth without reason or end. Our lot in life is to protect, not to alter our own Nature.

DESCENT – noun – 1. The act of descending; the act of passing from a higher to a lower placeby any form of motion, as by walking, riding, rolling, sliding, sinking or falling. 2. Inclination downward; obliquity; slope; declivity; as the descent of a hill, or a roof. 3. Progress downwardas the descent from higher to lower orders of beings4. Fall from a higher to a lower state or station5. A landing from ships; invasion of troops from the sea; as, to make a descent on Cuba. 6. A passing from an ancestor to an heirtransmission by succession or inheritanceas the descent of an estate or a title from the father to the son. Descent is lineal, when it proceeds directly from the father to the son, and from the son to the grandson; collateralwhen it proceeds from a man to his brothernephew or other collateral representative7. A proceeding from an original or progenitor. The Jews boast of their descent from Abraham. Hence, 8. Birth; extraction; lineage; as a noble descent. 9. A generation; a single degree in the scale of genealogy; distance from the common ancestor. No man is a thousand descents from Adam. 10. Offspring; issue; descendants. The care of our descent perplexes most. 11. A rank in the scale of subordination12. Lowest place13. In music, a passing from a note or sound to one more grave or less acute.

–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language

–=–

At some point, man becomes unman. At some point, man becomes a proprietary creation of man. At some point, man is no longer a creation of God (the Source of Nature) but an invention of a corporation (artificial person) under the authority of the government that corporation (person) is registered in. That time is upon us. We must choose our master, man’s designer A.I. machine or God’s Nature.

But this “unfolding” is not merely biological, for the mind and moral compass of man’s development must also be evolved to meet the changing nature of these so-called “sciences,” of transhumanism and other unnatural developments as the evolution or unfolding of man continues as an unabated “science.” One does not teach men born to be slaves the language of their masters, lest the carefully divided classes become equals and sit at the same tables. Of course, “education” is the best method towards unfolding (evolving) the impressionable young minds of all men so that they may come to culturally accept such scientific madness as a normality, and even as if it were the natural evolution of man. And are we not seeing just that, as new generations are being systematically confounded and reprogrammed to accept this artificially induced evolutionary process of augmented reality? For the the concept of a New World Order is merely the combining of all that stands in opposition into togetherness, a fusion of the real and unreal, life and non-life, spirit and flesh.

–=–

The Unfolding of Man. Research Note. Educational Policy Research Center – 67-47-

Author: Naranjo, Claudio

“Material gathered from educationreligionmedicine and related fields comprises this practical approach to dealing with human development. The unity underlying the multiplicity of ways of growth (150 educational methods or systems) is a recurrent theme. This unity transcends the seemingly diverse intentions of educationpsychiatryand religion. The author contends that close scrutiny may uncover enough of a meeting ground to warrant the ambition of a unified science and ART OF HUMAN CHANGE. Indeed, a consistent view of man’s development will fuse the three currently separated disciplines. The author suggests a phenomenological approach to practical ways of personal growth which provides an experiential meeting ground for diverse techniques, exercises and procedures that would contribute to the UNFOLDING OF MAN. His approach is intended to elucidate two things: (1) THE UNITIY OF SECULAR AND RELIGIOUS VIEWS CONCERNING THE PROCESS OF THE UNFOLDING OF MAN; and (2) the unity of various methods of achieving human growth from the standpoint of experiences these methods elicit, rather than from their external descriptions. (TL)”

Link–> http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED038713

–=–

Notice here folks: that’s a government website; an “educational” website. That’s the goal of the modern Common Core principle. Government controlled education… no wonder people are patriotic towards their own military occupier and destroyer, for it controls their intake of knowledge and thus hides its own intent. The pawns actually believe they are kings.

This is a multi-front attack. The A.I. is on. All systems go.

Of course the official “education” system will dispense with True religious and moral teaching towards the improved and evolved teaching of man’s scientific control of perceived “chaos” through this artificial, neo-humanistic order birthed from it. Man’s very soul must be misfolded with worthless fruit, the unnatural and seedless (groundless) information from that tree of the good and evil conceptualizations and inventions (fictions) of man.

One last note on this subject:

As I am not credentialed or respected by this official, consensus-based, syndicalist organized criminal element, and proudly so, I will put my thesis here. It is one that can change the world, and thus probably won’t go much further than this page. It is simply that prions prove Darwin’s theory of “natural” evolution to be completely false. In fact, it is this forced, unnatural evolution (unfolding) of man through prion misfolding that shows some form of “design,” be it “intelligent” or otherwise. This is not the point. The point is that cross-species transmission of these smallest of proteinaceous agents is infectious, causing great dis-ease to the host body. In other words, the symptoms are a sign that under no circumstances can two species be compatible, let along derived from each other. If man came from ape, then man’s body should be receptive to its source protein structure and biological programming. But it is not. In all cases of xenotransplantation (animal to human body part replacement) the immune system treats that special part as a foreign infection, and so the immune system must be nullified through pharmacopeia (witchcraft, potions, and poisoning) for the body to accept any foreign transplant. They simply are not compatible in a “natural” way. Thus “natural” evolution, at least as the “origin of species,” is bunk. Cancer is a symptom of evolution, for cancer is a direct response of the body to foreign (non-human) DNA programing, sometimes referred to as cancer “viruses.”

–=–

Viruses that can lead to cancer

Viruses are very small organisms; most can’t even be seen with an ordinary microscope. They are made up of a small number of genes in the form of DNA or RNA surrounded by A PROTEIN COATING. A virus must enter a living cell and “hijack” the cell’s machinery in order to reproduce and make more viruses. Some viruses do this by inserting their own DNA (or RNA) into that of the host cell. When the DNA or RNA affects the host cell’s genes, it can push the cell toward becoming cancer.

–=–

You’ll notice that most “cancer viruses” are from monkeys and other animals, which must be manually (purposefully) injected into the human body to cause infection, or transplanted in some other way. Other viruses that cause cancer, such as HPV, are also foreign agents, in this case a “wart” passed from human to human. The supposed HIV virus is another example, extremely similar to feline immunodeficiency virus (i.e. the supposed cause of feline AIDS), which can only cause disease when injected into the body, either through transmission or other cross-species contact. Whether it is actually a sexually transmitted disease is not clear or proven, and I have never known an unvaccinated (or non-intervenious drug-user) or other “blood product” user via inoculation of foreign or human blood pharmaceuticals to have the symptoms of AIDS or cancer.

This trend in cancer rates was documented in its early stages just after the turn of the 20th century:

–=–

Cancer was practically unknown until compulsory vaccination with COWPOX vaccine began to be introduced. I have had to deal with two hundred cases of cancer, and I never saw a case of cancer in an unvaccinated person.

–Dr. W.B. Clarke, a prominent physician in Indiana, from Eustace Mullins ‘Murder by Injection,’ pg 132, quoting The National Council for Medical Research, Virginia

–=–

And so I reiterate Dr. Clarke’s respected opinion here when I say that evolution was practically unknown until vaccination became commonplace, and that most modern diseases are in fact the symptoms of cross-species infection through vaccination. Whether vaccination “works” or does not is irrelevant at this point. For it is how they are grown and the delivery of unfiltered proteins and DNA that is the subject at hand. This has nothing to do with the theory of “vaccination” and everything to do with cross-species contamination. There is no left or right, right or wrong. There is only the fact that most of us have been infected with the DNA and prion proteins of many, many different species that vaccine cell substrates are grown on! To this fact, every vaccine insert warns us! This is wholly against every aspect of the Natural Law, the scriptural Law, and the law of reason. To this fact there is no debate.

–=–

Eaten blood is digested into its components so it ceases to be blood, and the body re-uses the components for different things. Transfused blood is not digested but functions as blood with all its vital properties for life.

—Jonathan Sarfati, Ph.D., excerpt from an article entitled: “New England Journal of Medicine promotes anti-theism”

—=—

For the life of the flesh is in the blood” 

—Leviticus 17: 11, 14, KJB

—=—

“VARIVAX [Varicella Virus Vaccine Live (Oka/Merck)]

VARIVAX… is a preperation of the Oka/Merck strain of live, attenuated varicella virus. The virus was initially obtained from a child with natural baricellathen introduced into human embryonic lung cell culturesadapted to and propagated in embryonic guinea pig cell cultures and finally propagated in human diploid cell cultures (WI-38). Further passage of the virus for varicella vaccine was performed at Merck Research Laboratories (MRL) in human diploid cell cultures (MRC-5)…

Each 0.5 mL dose of vaccine contains the following… residual components of MRC-5 cells including DNA and PROTEIN.

—Except taken directly from VARIVAX insert from actual vaccine package

–=–

The FDA is certainly aware of all this, and has been for a long time. It is a protective agent not for us, but for the corporations that government invests in and controls. The reader should ask themselves why vaccines are allowed to be used on the public and on pets when this type of information is readily available. But then, the reader would have to lose such fallacies as patriotism and love of country (love of artificial persons). We’s have to face reality, which is just too painful…

–=–

“Potential Risks of DNA in Vaccines

Residual DNA in vaccines derived from tumorigenic cells, including those transformed by Ad5, can pose potential risks to the vaccine recipient in two respectsoncogenicity and infectivity. Each of these biological properties must be considered and evaluated for each cell substrate.

“The oncogenic risk of cell substrate DNA has been considered to be due to several mechanisms. First, the residual DNA could have dominant activated oncogenes that could exert their effect following expression in recipient cells. In the case of Ad5-transformed cells, the dominant oncogenes would include the E1A and E1B genes. Second, the incoming DNA could integrate into the host genome in certain genes, such as the p53 gene or the retinoblastoma susceptibility (RB) gene, termed tumor suppressor geneswhich are involved in cell cycle control among other cellular processes. Loss of function of tumor suppressor genes has been associated with certain human tumors. Third, integration of residual cell-substrate DNA could result in the activation of cellular regulatory genes by promoter/enhancer insertion, and this could result in the development of a neoplastic phenotypethis mechanism for tumor development was initially described in chickens for leukemia formation by avian leukosis viruses. Another result of integration that has been described is an increased methylation of adjacent DNA sequences as well as sequences on other chromosomes, although the consequences of such changes in methylation patterns to a cell are unknown.

“The second biological activity of DNA that should be considered is its potential infectivity. If a genome of a DNA virus or the provirus of a retrovirus is present in the cell substrate used for vaccine manufacturethen the residual DNA has the potentialupon inoculation into the vaccine recipientto produce infectious virus from this DNA and thus establish a productive infection.

“The assessment of the risk of DNA — both the oncogenic risk and the infectious risk — needs to be considered both in terms of (1) the amount of residual DNA inoculated; and (2) the concentration of oncogene or infectious genome present in this DNA

“In considering potential risks associated with the use of these so-called Designer Cell Substrates – i.e., neoplastic cells derived from normal human cells transformed by defined viral or cellular oncogenes or by immortalizing cellular genes (e.g., telomerase) – OVRR/CBER is considering the approach outlined below within the framework of a “defined-risks” assessment… “A defined-risks approach to the regulatory assessment of the use of neoplastic cells as substrates for viral vaccine manufacture”, In EVOLVING Scientific and Regulatory Perspectives on Cell Substrates for Vaccine Development… The use of immortalized, neoplastic human cells as substrates to develop recombinant viral vectors as vaccines also raises theoretical concerns with regard to possible contamination with TSE/BSE (Human/transmissible form of Mad Cow Diseaseagents.

—FDA article from FDA website entitled “‘Designer’ Cells as Substrates for the Manufacture of Viral Vaccines”

–=–

We are being unwittingly evolved!

We marvel and cringe at the effects of “mad cow disease,” which is merely a prion disease caused by vaccinating (stinging) a healthy cow with infectiously programed sheep prions, and yet we treat our own madnesses called as the many names of “dementia” as somehow expected, age-related, and naturally occurring. We suffer this evil like good little patients, paying for “cures” that do not work from the very industry that intentionally knowingly infected us in the first place.

But then, the word patient is one of my favorite words, for we have no clue that we are patients of government from our birth. In fact, a citizenship is nothing more and nothing less than a patient of a government institution.

PATIENT – adjective – pa’shent. [Latin patient.] 1. Having the quality of enduring evils without murmuring or fretfulness; sustaining afflictions of body or mind with fortitudecalmness or christian submission to the divine will; as a patient person, or a person of patient temper. It is followed by ofbefore the evil endured; as patient of labor or pain; patient of heat or cold. 2. Not easily provoked; calm under the sufferance of injuries or offenses; not revengeful. Be patient towards all men. 1 Thessalonians 5:143. Persevering; constant in pursuit or exertion; calmly diligent. Whatever I have done is due to patient thought. 4. Not hasty; not over eager or impetuous; waiting or expecting with calmness or without discontent. Not patient to expect the turns of fate. – noun – A person or thing that received impressions from external agents; he or that which is passively affected. Malice is a passion so impetuous and precipitate, that it often involves the agent and the patient. 1. A person diseased or suffering bodily indisposition. It is used in relation to the physician; as, the physician visits his patient morning and evening. 2. It is sometimes used absolutely for a sick person. It is wonderful to observe how inapprehensive these patients are of their disease. – verb intransitive – To compose one’s self. [Not used.]

–=–

What the hell are you all waiting for so patiently???

Now we must remember, only what is a unique or novel creation of man can be patented as property of man’s person (a franchised legal status of government). And the only cure for the disease of man’s law is to be only the property of God’ Nature (Creation). This isn’t religion, it’s common sense. It the Highest LAW, the Law of Nature! And it is completely tainted by the false doctrines of the corporate church, which is merely an authorized, non-profit agent and artificial person of the state, the very state that wishes to become your involuntary god (creator) and master. When man is no longer man, when his genes and genome are newly created, patented property of government and its syndicalist corporate structure, then we will be born slaves. We will carry our person (status) in our very unnatural, trans-human design, the mark of proprietary beasts. For we will have allowed ourselves to deny our own Nature, our own place within God, and instead to become a creation of man.

—=—

“The products of man’s imagination and undisciplined appetite may have a boomerang effect which in due time may well overpower him.

Jonas Salk, from: ‘Man Unfolding

—=—

It is not difficult to understand at all. It’s real simple… Because we are not “religiously” following the Law of Nature, which is laid out succinctly in the Bible, and because we have thus lost respect for the very Laws (Design) of Nature Itself as we try and alter and improve upon them through unnatural evolution, we are dooming ourselves to a literal hell on earth. We are allowing ourselves to be controlled utterly by devils (attorneys).

DEVILING – noun – A young devil. (Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

DEVILLING – A term used in London of a barrister recently admitted to the barwho assists a junior barrister in his professional workwithout compensation and without appearing in any way in the matter.(Black’s Law 4th Edition)

DEVIL’S HORNS – When managers focus on an undesirable trait. They do not see future and current success potential(Black’s Law 4th Edition)

DEVIL – noun – Devl. [Latin, to calumniate.] 1. In the Christian theology, an evil spirit or being; a fallen angel, expelled from heaven for rebellion against God; the chief of the apostate angels; the implacable enemy and tempter of the human race. In the New Testament, the word is frequently and erroneously used for demon2. A very wicked person, and in ludicrous language, an great evil. In profane language, it is an expletive expressing wondervexation, etc. 3. An idol, or false god. Leviticus 17:72 Chronicles 11:15. (Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

DEMON – …Evil spirit or geniuswhich influences the conduct or directs the fortunes of mankind.  (Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

DEMONIAC, DEMONIACAL or DEMONIAN – adjective – 1. Pertaining to demons or evil spirits. 2. Influenced by demonsproduced by demons or evil spirits (Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

DEMONIAC – Phrensy. – noun – A human being possessed by a demonone whose volition and other mental faculties are overpoweredrestrainedor disturbedin their regular operationby an evil spiritor by a created spiritual being of superior power (Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

CALUMNIATE – verb transitive – [See Calumny] To accuse or charge one falsely, and knowingly, with some crime, offense, or something, disreputable; to slander. – verb intransitive – To charge falsely and knowingly with a crime or offense; to propagate evil reports with a design to injure the reputation of another. (Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

CALUMNY – noun – Slanderfalse accusation of a crime or offense, knowingly or maliciously made or reported, to the injury of another; false representation of facts reproachful to another, made by design, and with knowledge of its falsehood; sometimes followed by on. Neglected calumny soon expires. (Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

–=–

Which demons possess you?

Would you even know as an evolved, unfolded pseudo-man?

What false gods do you allow to bedevil and calumniate you?

Just who or what are the devil’s advocates?

Trust me when I say that truth is way stranger than any church fiction…

For what you may not have comprehended quite yet is that we are speaking here of biological slander, a rewriting of our Source program, as the propagation of evil designs upon our very genomic structure. We are being bewitched and bedeviled at the cellular level, calumniated to an end that will cause us to be abhorrent to our Natural Source, and instead to one made by the design of these evil geniuses (human devils). We are being made criminals from God and Nature, chimeras that must be bound and chained for our offensive natures. Words will no longer be needed in this charge, for our crimes will be spelled out in our DNA sequence chains.

You see the great mystery is that all the monsters in the Bible, as well as all the saints, are just various forms of man. Man is the only species that acts against its own Nature and best interests. And so even as you cry foul and weep at the loss of this world you still refuse to pick up the one book that would save your very life and soul. For the designs of these devils in suits and ties and white lab coats is to make you into mere animals, which translates to soulless beasts, a purposefully designed lack of anima. The Bible is an instruction manual on how to avoid these devils, especially the ones that lurk in the church and state.

–=–

Devillingas the period of pupillage or training to become an advocate is generally known, lasts between eight and nine months, and comprises a mix of skills training courses and time spent working with a devilmaster. The compulsory skills training courses, which are described in more detail in the following pages, are spread across the devilling period and last for about nine weeks in total. For the balance of the period of devilling, devils work closely with their devilmasters.

All devils have a principal devilmaster who is a practicing member of the junior bar of at least seven years standing, and working primarily in civil practice. Devils will also spend part of the time with another devilmaster practicing in the criminal courtsand many devils spend a short period of time with a third devilmaster working in a different aspect of civil work from his or her principal devilmaster

“The Faculty of Advocates is a body of independent lawyers who have been admitted to practice as Advocates before the Courts of Scotland. Faculty records date as far back as 1532 when the College of Justice was established by an Act of the Scottish Parliament, though its origins are believed to predate that event.”

—Copied from from official UK website (advocates.org.uk), explaining the act of ‘Deviling’, and finally excerpted from its main “about” page. It is important to note that though this information on the “deviling” page was specifically removed in late 2015, but that its origin remains. This excerpt is taken from a 111 page publication entitled “The Devil’s Handbook,” 12th Edition, 2014/15, published by the Faculty of Advocates, Advocates Library, Parliament House, Edinburgh EH1 1RF

–=–

This is no joke! This is a government publication and is excerpted from a government website. This is the true nature of the umbrella of the International Bar Association (IBA) and its many national members.

But let us not go too far astray. For I have uncovered so much more of this artful design, and have removed the vail and barrier of popular debate from the equation. Debate is the great mountain of obfuscation, which, by its official rules, requires one to protect lies and stand in defense of what one does not believe in. This is professional debate, a tool used to train priests, politicians, and attorneys, or what I call the modern Pharisees.

I knew the debate on what are popularly named as “chemtrails” was over and pointless, for instance, when I found that the most “prestigious” universities around the world were teaching “Geo-Engineering” of the land, air, and seas and offering professional degrees and diplomatic papers (diplomas) therein. No geo-engineering or chemtrail skeptic can overlook the fact that this monster of organized crime against nature, which by illusion labeled (named/noun) as the sponsored and regulated “education” system of government, is offering degrees and therefore a requirement for legal licensure in geo-engineering the entire planet! The debate, I found, was merely a smokescreen as obvious to the senses as the chemtrails themselves, designed to make the common man believe not even his own eyes.

Blog Link: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2014/05/11/degrees-in-geo-engineering-and-sustainable-development/

Blog Link: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2016/01/18/geo-engineering-controlled-chaos-via-predictive-programming/

And so we find that all we have been exposing for so many years, decades in fact, is now the subject of dinner conversation and climate change discussions, as we – the boys who supposedly cried wolf – are now conveniently forgotten instead of just outright ignored.

Here is a perfect example of the respect garnered to these false, flattering titles of mega-corporations, as that which is allotted to this syndicalist “education” monopoly of the state. Under the top 10 rankings of schools and universities is listed each one by rank of prestige, with an imaginary, non-referential “score” placed next to each institution as its numerical ranking according to that pretended, apparitional quality of prestige. Ironically, most folks would actually choose which schools they wish to attend by these so-called rankings in “prestige” having no idea the actual root meaning of that word.

Here’s the top 10 schools ranked by their so-called prestige:

1. Harvard University – 100.0
2. Stanford University – 97.6
3. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) – 97.2
4. Princeton University – 97.0
5. Columbia University in the City of New York – 96.2
6. University of California, Berkeley – 96.1
7. Yale University – 96.0
8. Williams College – 94.1
9. Dartmouth College – 94.1
10. University of Notre Dame – 93.5

–=–

Oh, the conformists wet dream. But what happens when we consider these undefined terms of art by their true meaning? What happens when we actually define this word prestige?

Remember, everything is magical illusion…

PRESTIGES – noun – [Latin proestigioe.] Juggling tricks; impostures.

PRESTIGIATION – noun – [Latin proestigioetricks.] The playing of legerdemain tricksa juggling.

LEGERDEMAIN – noun – [See Light.] Slight of hand; a deceptive performance which depends on dexterity of handa trick performed with such art and adroitness, that the manner or art eludes observation. The word is sometimes used adjectively; as a legerdemain trick.

PRESTIGIATOR – noun – A jugglera cheat.

PRESTIGIATORY – adjective – Jugglingconsisting of impostures.

PRESTIGIOUS – adjective – Practicing tricksjuggling.

IMPOSTURE – noun – [Latin impostura. See Impose.] Deception practiced under a false or assumed character; fraud or imposition practiced by a false pretender. —Form new legendsAnd fill the world with follies and impostures.

–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language

–=–

What is a university but a clearing house of the victor’s falsified histories and instructions in fictional, artful things? What are they but government approved and censored agencies permitted to teach the acknowledgements of men, the synthesis of all things exposed to the filters of these institutions of that Hegelian Dialectic. Oh, how we have been tricked by the magical spellings and artful images (idols) of historical figures that sought only to defeat True knowledge attainment by the masses of illiterates. The dark light of the legerdemain wordsmith, scientist, and mathematician enlightens not the soul, but instead drives it into an adversarial state to stand against its own True Light and Nature.

To quote again, strangely enough, from my own upcoming “Volume II” of the “Strawman” book series:

“In etymology, the English word prestige stems from the word “trick,” taken from the 16th century French prestige, meaning “deceitimpostureillusion,” and in the Modern French “illusionmagicglamour.” From the Latin praestigium we get the meaning of “delusionillusion” as is used for the adjective “prestigious.” Prestige was a derogatory term until the 19th century, where it was applied to Napoleon within the sense of his having politically a “dazzling influence” in 1815.

To be described as prestigious from the 1540’s was to be one who partook in “practicing illusion or magic” and was “deceptive,” stemming from the Latin praestigious as “full of tricks,” and from praestigiae meaning “juggler’s tricks,” which was likely altered by dissimilation from praestrigiae, and from praestringere meaning “to blindblindfolddazzle,” from prae “before” (same as pre-) added before stringere “to tie or bind” (as the verb to strain). Again, this was a derogatory term until the 19th century.

This notion of garnering state papers that show degree of education as a diploma (diplomatic papers) is comparable to the noun cachet, meaning a “seal affixed to a letter or document” from the 16th century, stemming from the Old French dialectal cacher “to presscrowd,” and from the Latin coactare “constrain” (cache). The French term lettre de cachet, meaning “letter under seal of the king,” made the evolutionary linguistic transliteration as a “(letter underpersonal stamp (of the king)” to the modern word “prestige.”

A diploma is simply permission from the state to commit a certain degree of crime while acting in the states fictional (legal) persona; to take upon the surname a flattering title that would be unlawful to possess and profess for those not brainwashed by the syndicalist education monopoly.

In fact the etymological meaning of the very word education is shockingly defined from the 1530s as, “childrearing,” equivalent to “the training of animals,” from Middle French education (14c.) and directly from Latin educationem (nominative educatio) “a rearingtraining,” the noun of action from past participle stem of educare (educate). The origin of education was as the instruction in social codes and manners; the meaning “systematic schooling and training for work” is from 1610s.

Let’s face it, all beasts of burden, including, as the U.S. Code repeatedly defines us, “man and other animals,” need to be trained for our place in animal husbandry and human trafficking under this human capital management system.

But hey, don’t worry, after reading this work you can always beg to be re-educated and placed back into the prestige of that fictional matrix of civil “life.” Just believe…

As for the intent of this institutionalized corporate structure of public education, it is to pre-strain an individual, meaning to limit knowledge to a particular direction or practice. The verb strain comes from around 1300, meaning to “tiebind, fastengird,” from the present participle stem of Old French estreindre “bind tightlyclaspsqueeze,” from the Latin stringere meaning “draw tight, bind tightcompresspress together,” and also “to strokerubpress” with cognates from Lithuanian stregti “congealfreezebecome stiff;” Greek strangein “twist;” Old High German strician “mends nets;” Old English streccian “to stretch;” and from German stramm and Dutch stram meaning “stiff“). From late 14th century it takes the meaning of “tightenmake taut,” and also to “exert oneselfoverexert (a body part),” with the sense of “press through a filter, put (a liquid) through a strainer” also from early 14th century, while the meaning of “to stress beyond measurecarry too farmake a forced interpretation of” is from mid-15th century.

Ultimately, the university accreditation system is merely an authoritarian, for-profit monopoly that stands both as the barrier of true knowledge and as the forced source of officially bestowed permissive ability to participate or practice in most regulated commercial functions of government. The word authority, as it applies to the university school system, literally stems from autorite “book or quotation that settles an argument,” from the Old French auctorité “authorityprestigerightpermissiondignitygravitythe Scriptures.” The Modern French autorité, from the Latin auctoritatem (nominative auctoritas), has the meaning of “inventionadviceopinioninfluencecommand,” from auctor “masterleaderauthor.” Most poignantly, this word authority from the late 14th century has the meaning of “power to enforce obedience,” and as “people in authority” is from the 1610s. Authorities in modern times was recorded as “those in chargethose with police powers” since the mid-19th century.

The song lyrics Teach Your Children Well comes to mind. For to have power over “education” by promoting the word-trickery of prestige over governmental institutions, this monopoly on knowledge can be retained by those keepers of mysteries in high authority. Oz can thus remain hidden behind a curtain of idiocy spelled out as a pretended history (his-story) in those prestigious text books.

The monopoly of education is dystopia.

Utopia cannot stand or thrive on ignorance.”

–=–

It is an amazing feeling to realize that the “professors” of “professions” are really just full of their own peers’ manufactured shit, corrupted to their capacity on the fiction of artful concepts and spoiled fruit from the fig-apple tree of worthless knowledge, being passed on to future generations just as it was “educationally” passed on to their animal selves. Imagine the arrogance it takes to accept a “masters” degree in anything taught by those who as well received their own “masters” degree from another manufactured “master” and so on. That a 23 year old “adult” can be awarded a certificate of “mastery” in anything is as ridiculous as the Mormon “Church” corporation sole assigning the flattering title of “elder” to 12 year old kids and doing so not in their christian name, but in their legal surname, totally against the scriptures. This is how flattering titles (names) are used, carrying no substance of the reality they formally represent (in artificial form/character/person/title), just as the clothes do not make the man. Mastery is a lifetime achievement, and one often recognized publicly only after the death of that master. A “Masters” degree, however, is currently on sale for $99,999. It is a name, a title, not a reality. Education, position, and status for sale; a devil’s contract of monetary and performance debt. To the cheater, to one raised to be a cheater and to summarily respect the prestige of university word magic and legerdemain trickery without question, it is par for the course that one should fallaciously flaunt a piece of paper sealed by the state so as to cheat even themselves out of ever Truly mastering anything at all, aside from their assigned and professed degree of crime and aptitude in their chosen, commercially professed fiction. Such professions are like invisible prisons for the mind, with humility nowhere to be found and where cognitive dissonance blossoms.

Likewise, to have a Masters in the English language is about as reasonable as having a prize for the most prestigious dingleberry in ones upper butt crack, professing oneself to a state-sanctioned mastery of what Mark Twain called the most “mongrel” language, a literalist word construction known also as “dog-Latin,” which was grammatically built for the purpose of mass public deception and illiteracy. The names of things we learn at 3 years old never change throughout our commercial livelihoods, for the metaphor and the parable is completely lost on the publicly educated, literalist English speaker, while their legal and “Romantic” origins reak havoc upon society. We learn the empty monetary value of all things by their names (nouns), but never the substance and essence of that which is enslaved by such artificial valuation and empty nomenclature. Strangely, we only know words by their name, not their substance or True meaning and Nature. And this explains the foundation of all our problems.

—=—

“So, we start with the question, now, as to why we cannot ask the question why? And that is because of the absence of knowledge of first cause At school, for instance, we learn to liken words to objects. But even when we apply the word to the object, we have lost something. We have lost inner-meaning. We call things by the name. We say this is a “carrot.” And we therefore get a good mark on our examination paper. But what is a “carrot?” Neither the student nor the teacher knows, actually. It becomes merely a term to define the fact that we have accepted the language which we are studying, and that in that language, this particular vegetable is a “carrot.” But this does not tell us a thing about the “carrot.” It only divides it from some other vegetable. Why it is divided, how it is divided, what the life meanswe do not know. But from the very earliest times, human beings attempted to find ways of learning the true meaning of the things which they classified… They made likenesses of the thing they were trying to discover or decide. And in this way they had a little more dimension than we get from words… Words have to be carefully considered and weighed. They can be the cause of war. They can result in riots. They can bring down the stock exchange in a bad catastrophe. They can do all kinds of things to us that we cannot appreciate or understand. And just as we are not permitted by law to injure other persons physically, we must sometimes realize that we can more profoundly influence and injure them verbally… Now, children today aren’t taught basic languageThey are taught the names of things, and believe that (because) they have the name that they know the thing. So that if someone asks them, what is a “carrot,” they are apt to say “a vegetable,” and get the correct mark. But they don’t know what a character is, or a “carrot,” or anything else. They do not understand, but they consider the subject closed by the name. And the same is true in many different levels and developments of life. We give names to things, answer them according to their names, and consider that enough. This is one of the points that was made… in connection with education; the problem of finding out the names of things in terms of meaning. And the way to gain meaning is to recognize the basic vitality of the subject under discussion… In other words you have to be able to feel the facts of a thingnot merely listen to it and buy dictionaries. You have to participate in the experience of something in order to know it. And that was why such an emphasis was placed upon pre-school education. The problem is very certain that the faculties of true understanding have to be developed before schooling comes, or the schooling will be very largely rejected. We will finally end up with the individual memorizing the words and knowing nothing about the substance. So the person has to learn to recognize substance first. And the first substances of life are not learned in school, but in the pre-school period of childhood in which the association with adults or with others of its own age group, these result in certain basic experiences of like and dislike, of exception and acceptance and rejection. These things we gradually learn intuitively, then when education comes, we give meaning to words. Otherwise we give no meaning, and we just keep on using words without giving them any substanceessenceor vitality

“Historians, of course, use words to influence the reader. And it is generally admitted today that 90% of history is written by victors at the expense of the vanquished. And we always make a villain out of the loserregardless of circumstances. So, we have all kinds of problems in history. We take the wordswe believe them. But we don’t know whether they are true or not We decide that the historian is correct if we agree with him. He is incorrect if we disagree with him. When in reality the facts of the matter are seldom actually considered.”

—Manly P. Hall, from his recorded lecture on “Language: the Use, Misuse and Abuse of Words”

—=—

Today’s “historians” seem to have been metamorphosed into bloggers and shock jocks on radio, news outlets, and newspapers, and as actors in Hollywood. Historical “facts” are delivered sometimes even before modern events ever happen. And so it is safe to embrace Mr. Hall’s perception that 90% of history, including that being broadcast and recorded instantly and live on the spot, is likely only the sponsored and paid for opinions of a powerful propagandist regime we call as our government. This model goes well with Huxley’s opinion that 90% of the population is quite hypnotizable in different degrees. No one seems to want to face the Truth that we are a morally, spiritually, and educationally defeated people. For that would mean inevitably that we are as well a militarily conquered people, and that our so-called government is actually the victor of this information war.

Fortunately in my own journey, my early research  uncovered this design in totality. And I found that the definition of that word “conquer” actually carries the same meaning as the word “purchase,” and that the word “military” simply means thee entirety of the “Executive” enforcement branch of government. Let us not pretend that their money system, which no one can seem to deny, has certainly conquered us all. For the very industries that this government sanctioned education system grants degrees of crime and licensed (anarchical) diplomacy to are also the private and public stock corporations that government collectively owns through its international investment schemes. For it only seeks the most impressionable, hypnotizable of fools to fill with the most human of false pride those flatteringly titled positions of tenure and public employment. Only he who is most impressed and indebted by the word magic and prestige of their own paid-for educational experience will be accepted into bearing such prestigious flattering titles of professional and nonsensical conduct, bound in every way by their original performance debt of citizenship in agency to that principal government.

And so the reader should pay close attention to my much earlier, foundational research into CAFR’s, which shows government to be the main shareholder of ALL important and influential corporate stock through its non-governmental and pension investment schemes in all corporations around the world, especially in those pharmaceutical companies that have caused so much destruction of life and health in all nations and tribes.

To be clear, the regulator (government) regulates the corporations it owns through stock investment and indirectly votes (as collective shareholder) through proxy vote for the boards of directors, mergers and acquisitions, and other corporate governance issues. The regulator regulates its own corporate empire, a syndicalist domain of pure and utter “legalized” corruption. When government is the main or even partial shareholder of corporations as the design of “fascism” is said to be, and when the highest law of corporations is to protect its shareholders, then its oil companies are not made to clean up their spills and its pharmaceutical companies are allowed to lie to the public and kill in the name of scientific medicine in the name of profit and gain. And this is why primary research is so important, for they do not lie to government, only to us.

Of course, to be published one must cover up the Truth, which is why journals never do what we have done, explaining the entire cover-up publicly for full comprehension. When government owns through stock investment and voting powers the totality of mainstream media that, if it were actually independent, would otherwise criticize and report all aspects of the organized crime of government, then one should immediately recognize this conflict of interest and turn away from such an obvious propaganda outlet.

While Project Mockingbird is well known and even blatantly admitted on the CIA’s own website, we must realize that this sort of clandestine infiltration into the media is no longer necessary. For when government owns the majority holding of stock, it calls the shots by proxy. And those board members for which it collectively votes into each corporate boardroom certainly will not depose the hand that owns and feeds it. For the shareholders also proxy vote and approve salaries, raises, and bonuses for those syndicalist members of its held corporations.

But it is fun to remember when at least we believed the organized crime was on the outside, that it was imported into these media companies instead of being merely homegrown and quite expected and business as usual…

–=–

“You could get a journalist cheaper than a good call girl, for a couple hundred dollars a month.”

–CIA operative, discussing the availability and prices of journalists willing to peddle CIA propaganda and cover stories. Katherine the Great, by Deborah Davis

–=–

“The CIA currently maintains a network of several hundred foreign individuals around the world who provide intelligence for the CIA and at times attempt to influence opinion through the use of covert propaganda. These individuals provide the CIA with direct access to a large number of newspapers and periodicals, scores of press services and news agenciesradio and television stationscommercial book publishersand other foreign media outlets.

–Church Select Committee Report on U.S. Intelligence activities, 1975-76

–=–

“There is quite an incredible spread of relationships.  You don’t need to manipulate Time magazine, for example, because there are [Central IntelligenceAgency people at the management level.

–William B. Bader, former CIA intelligence officer, briefing members of the Senate Intelligence Committee, The CIA and the Media, by Carl Bernstein

–=–

“The Agency’s relationship with [The New York] Times was by far its most valuable among newspapers, according to CIA officials.  [It was] general Times policy ... to provide assistance to the CIA whenever possible.

–The CIA and the Media, by Carl Bernstein

–=–

“The history of the CIA’s involvement with the American press continues to be shrouded by an official policy of obfuscation and deception for the following principal reasons:

■ The use of journalists has been among the most productive means of intelligence‑gathering employed by the CIA. Although the Agency has cut back sharply on the use of reporters since 1973 primarily as a result of pressure from the media), some journalist‑operatives are still posted abroad.

■ Further investigation into the matter, CIA officials say, would inevitably reveal a series of embarrassing relationships in the 1950s and 1960s with some of the most powerful organizations and individuals in American journalism.

Among the executives who lent their cooperation to the Agency were Williarn Paley of the Columbia Broadcasting System, Henry Luce of Time Inc., Arthur Hays Sulzberger of the New York Times, Barry Bingham Sr. of the LouisviIle Courier‑Journaland James Copley of the Copley News Service. Other organizations which cooperated with the CIA include the American Broadcasting Company (ABC)the National Broadcasting Company (NBC)the Associated Press (AP)United Press International UPI)ReutersHearst NewspapersScripps‑HowardNewsweek magazinethe Mutual Broadcasting Systemthe Miami Herald and the old Saturday Evening Post and New York Herald‑Tribune.

By far the most valuable of these associations, according to CIA officials, have been with the New York TimesCBS and Time Inc.

Link: http://www.carlbernstein.com/magazine_cia_and_media.php

–=–

If even one American overseas carrying a press card is a paid informer for the CIA, then all Americans with those credentials are suspect… If the crisis of confidence faced by the news business—along with the government—is to be overcome, journalists must be willing to focus on themselves the same spotlight they so relentlessly train on others! …When it was reported… that newsmen themselves were on the payroll of the CIA, the story caused a brief stir, and then was dropped.

–Stuart Loory, former Los Angeles Times correspondent, excerpt from the Columbia Journalism Review, as reprinted at Link: http://www.carlbernstein.com/magazine_cia_and_media.php

–=–

“Over the past several years, the Bush administration has learned that it can engage the press in an adversarial way, and the public won’t mind. It’s yet another step in MANAGED NEWS

–Tom Hollihan, journalism expert at USC’s Annenberg School, from an interview on Christian Science Moniter titled, ‘Bush administration blurs media boundary’

–=–

“Senator William Proxmire has pegged the number of employees of the federal intelligence community at 148,000… though Proxmire’s number is itself a conservative one.  The “intelligence community” is officially defined as including only those organizations that are members of the U.S. Intelligence Board (USIB); a dozen other agenciescharged with both foreign and domestic intelligence choresare not encompassed by the term  The number of intelligence workers employed by the federal government is not 148,000, but some undetermined multiple of that number.”

–Jim Hougan, ‘Spooks’

–=–

“For some time I have been disturbed by the way the CIA has been diverted from its original assignmentIt has become an operational and at times a POLICY-MAKING ARM of the government I never had any thought that when I set up the CIA that it would be injected into PEACETIME cloak and dagger operations.

–Former President Harry Truman, 22 December 1963, one month to the day after the JFK assassination, op-ed section of the Washington Post, early edition

–=–

Now, how do you think this type of government infiltration of the CIA could happen? The answer is that no infiltration never really needed to happen. All corporations are government-created corporations, registered under the commercial protection of government, and the maxim of law states clearly that protection requires subjection. That goes for all subjects, all public (registered) citizenships (natural persons) and corporations (artificial persons). The government funded, floated corporate bonds, and over the years invested in the majority stock of all media and other corporations. The stockholders thus collectively and in consensus through private, non-governmental associations (NGOs) voted for the boards of directors of all those media corporations and in turn the governmentally hand-picked board of directors votes for their CEOs. And the conglomeration and monopolies formed since were simply government proxy shareholder votes pooled together for supporting mergers and acquisitions, as well as loose regulation and deregulation of such otherwise unlawful trusts.

Of course the CIA is the media. Duh!

This is syndicalism.

The regulator protects itself by protecting that which it has an interest in and which is also subject to its laws, never allowing the Truth to spill over in any comprehensible way for public consumption. And so when we out here independently without papers and pedigrees expose this stuff publicly we are made to appear like crazy nut-balls without perspective by those trained lapdogs, and our lack of syndicalistic “credentials” apparently means that our neutral research should be dismissed outright, despite the fact that all of it is the officially sourced materials of government unstarched for and thus unseen by the average person, as that which is never publicized in any revealing or talked about way. Most just pull out their imaginary copy of the constitution and beat it over our heads, pretending it was created for the common subject. More idiocracy, fro the preamble lets us know exactly who created the constitution and who its legacy is inherited to.

As George Carlin comedically but with all due seriousness and integrity stated:

–=–

“The real looting in this country takes place in the transfer of the wealth from the poor to the rich… and the poor have been systematically looted in this country. The rich have been made richer under this criminal, fascist president and his government.

—George Carlin

–=–

What George didn’t mention is that “the rich” is merely a colloquialism for the bloodline, the private, feudal landholders, the family business, which is the commercial United States. Of course, the common people are still convinced that being a “white person” in law has anything to do with skin color, and that “Barrack Obama” is actually a black person. Silly rabbits, persons aren’t Real. Persons are words on paper. They have no “color” except the ink they are printed with. A person (legal status) is whatever government says it is.

Syndicalism requires both the compartmentalization and the character assassination of any who refuse their grant of credentialism, which includes the imaginary division of races. Never is the True nature information disputed, only the public’s perception of the messenger. Works every time… Hell, people still believe that David Duke is a member and Grand Dragon of the Ku Klux Klan and the Nazi Party, though almost forty years has passed since that affiliation.

Well then in full disclosure I must therefore admit, I once (and only once) went to a “witchcraft” coffee shop meet-up here in Salt Lake City because I was curious why so many covens existed here around the Mormon corporation, which therefore means I must be witch. But in context, I was interested in the fact that the “profit” (president) of the so-called church was born of Anne Hutchinson, a condemned witch in Salem, Mass, which was posted in a chart at their own genealogy center! Guess they thought no one would look at Mrs. hutchinson history, because now her name is magically vanished from that genealogy chart. Guess that’s what happens when you speak the Truth on local AM radio in the heart of Mormon history!

Of course, the only magic I saw was the miraculous disappearance of any tip for the barrister.

For those interested in the real magic that ails them through the magic wand of the vaccination needle, my initial research and construction of the prion plague can be found here, though most of our more recent research was exposed over the radio:

Blog Link: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2012/11/11/xenotransplantation-creating-the-zombie-appocalypse/

Blog Link: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2013/02/20/the-prion-chronicles-prions-and-als/

Blog Link: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2014/12/04/the-prion-chronicles-the-story-of-interferon/

Patrick Jordon’s continuum of many books, including his latest “The Prion Agenda,” as well as many other sources can be found here: vaccinefraud.com

Examples of Patrick’s and my own many radio shows are linked below, where this evolutionary process through pharma-science “medicine” and the spread of animal and insect prions into the human body is exposed thoroughly. Note that the amount of research put into these shows represents both of our life’s work, and cannot be qualified in any other way.

Oh, and by the way, they are now aerosolizing prions, and my documentary shows why this is perfectly legal. Breath it in, baby…

Audio Link: https://corporationnationradioarchives.wordpress.com/2016/04/09/the-dynamic-duo-return-tomorrow-april-10-on-ucy-tv/

Audio Link: https://corporationnationradioarchives.wordpress.com/2015/06/17/radio-show-number-384-june-15-2015/

Audio Link: https://corporationnationradioarchives.wordpress.com/2016/03/25/clint-goes-solo-this-sunday/

But by all means, let’s keep ignoring this plague and its promoted delivery system as our friends, family, and eventually our own bodies are degraded and “evolved” (unfolded) in ways unimagined throughout all of modern history, except perhaps in some obscure genres of science fiction. And God forbid that the profits of the medical industry could be harmed by the consequences of such a disclosure. After all, the most profitable gains collected from the spread of disease is only in the treatment of the symptoms that the villainous infector causes, right?

Instead, let us keep doing habitually what the Laws of Nature forbid, polluting and cross-contaminating our bodies with the DNA and infected protein (prions) of every species on the planet through vaccination, including aborted human fetal tissue.

Even more insane, these infectious prions and their antibodies are available for purchase from several biologic companies. For instance, you can buy GOAT ANTI HUMAN PEROXIREDOXIN 2 (C-TERMINAL)” here:

Link: http://www.biocompare.com/pfu/110447/soids/324765/Antibodies/prion_protein

–=–

And here we find available for sale from BioLegend corporation the following anti-human products:

APC anti-human CD230 (Prion) Antibody

FITC anti-human CD230 (Prion) Antibody

PE anti-human CD230 (Prion) Antibody

Biotin anti-CD230 (Prion) Antibody

Purified anti-Prion Antibody

Link: http://www.biolegend.com/index.php?page=pro_sub_cat&action=search&criteria=CD230

–=–

Santa Cruz Biotechnology also sells the following:

Jurkat + anti-CD3 + anti-CD28 Cell Lysate
whole cell lysate
500 µg in 200 µl
acute T cell leukemia
human

rabbit anti-human IgG-FITC
fluorescein conjugated secondary antibody
200 µg in 0.5 ml

goat anti-human IgG-FITC
fluorescein conjugated secondary antibody

Link: http://www.scbt.com/display.php?search_catalog=anti-human

–=–

If you hurry, you might even win this contest. The prize? Free monoclonal antibodies!

Link: http://www.scbt.com/promotionals.html

–=–

This biomedical madness is the thing true terrorism is potentially made of. It’s not even a black market, but quite in the open, where infectious disease and cancerous cells are showcased like whores in the Red Light District. It’s like children (elders) buying unlimited and unregulated candy at the local 7-11. And this anti-human prion plague has been transmitted to every vaccinated man, woman, or child reading this.

While this is just one example of what we have uncovered, sourced in triplicate after years of research collection and cogitation, it may help my readers in empathizing with my own frustration and profound sadness as my life’s research goes unheard and unheeded for lack of my own holding of any soul-eating syndicalist university credentialism. Of course, most of this hell on earth comes directly from that University system, where life itself is being patently (as property) altered (evolved) into some unique (novel) form and catalogued on behalf of government’s investment scheme in the genomic mapping horror film of all life… and subsequently of all that is therefore anti-life.

I explained in full detail, after months of intense research and contemplation, the very DNA of the education system here, how it works and why it would and should be immediately disrespected and dismantled… that is if any rational sense was left over in mankind after our minds have been “unfolded” by these human development and resource (slave) management corporations.

Blog Link: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2014/11/06/debunking-education-exposing-the-syndicate/

But who among us wishes to discover that our own diploma (legal, diplomatic papers) are only a sign and token of our own agentic conformity, acceptance, allowance, and syndicalism to this completely evil, totally government-funded, conspiratorial education system? Who wants to admit that education is to teach you what to think in a “profession” but not how to think or question its authority, causing one to be licensed and permitted only to profess what government compartmentally allows us to? Who wants to acknowledge that their bought-and-paid-for position of employment and legal status under a legal, flattering title of diplomacy and licensure under the legal state can only be accomplished by loving (believing) or at least pretending to believe and practice in the official story and history that every industry is built around? Who would give up their money, their pensions, their 401k, even when it is patently obvious that all one has was bought purely by filthy lucre?

Who among us that is “successful” because of their “education” and papers is willing to accept that the etymological meaning of the word education is “the training of animals,” the word animal meaning a “soulless” beast of burden or “domesticated pet?” Who wants to admit that their employment is slavery under contract, and that their moral will is decimated by that contract with the devils (attorneys) of those corporations?

Who wants to stand up against the grain to expose the Truth about their very own industry and artificial status (title) within it knowing that their funding and artificial, “professional” respect in that criminal syndicate and paychecks in mammon will be lost? No, it is better that billions suffer and die than to risk that scarlet letter of a true whistleblower.

Ironically, the reason I have nothing, the reason I am “poor” and almost destitute in material things is because I consciously and physically turned away from such false, flattering titles granted by the gods of the state. I turned towards the only Truth, the anti-fiction, slowly moving away from all artifice back into the True Nature of all things. I saw through the names and felt the emptiness of them. My own bought and paid for diploma is worthless for my lack of conformity and tribute to such syndicalism. I allowed myself to feel, to embrace the repulsion I contracted towards my own industry of choice, and to allow the responsibility of my actions to rest upon my own shoulders, not that of the artificial person (corporation) I pretended to be an “moral agent” (employee) of. I quit Hollywood. I quit entertainment. I quit propaganda. I quit making fiction that is adversarial to God and Nature, which in turn bars man’s enlightenment and replaces it with the darkest of false lights.

My particular story is here, a powerful and very personal testimony to the choices we all make and the evils that we pretend don’t exist because of our own participation and syndicalist self-interest in the world of legalism and corporations (artificial personhood). When our jobs truly depend on our being silent to such evils, then we are certainly consenting to and are in legal fact a willing participant of that evil.

Blog Link: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2013/01/05/why-i-quit-hollywood/

Like so many out there still retaining some conscious awareness and still not plagued with pharmaceutical drugs, I used to think that I was somehow different, that something was wrong with me. I wasn’t “normal.” I could not fit into any part of this artificial matrix culture and commercially driven society no matter how much effort I put into the practice. I couldn’t stop asking questions and demanding answers. And so with every educational trade I pretentiously “mastered” I would ultimately cease in its pursuit as a career, recognizing its artful intentions as being purposefully and by design against the best interests of man and Nature. I could not control my sense of righteousness, my strict moral rectitude bounding from within, and thus my words would always get me in trouble as I expressed my True feelings and spiritual Nature in defense of the innocent. Among the Jews of Hollywood, this spiritual strength is a tangible death mark, a black ball, a self-sacrifice. For them, only goyim (voluntary slaves) need apply.

And so this was my journey, continuously uncovering the unnatural and criminal element of all things, both normalized and customary. It led me to join others of like mind, holding up signs and calling bullshit on everything around us, exposing lie after lie without remedy or solution, like a bunch of old men complaining about everything and everyone but themselves, pretending that there was some better time or system we must return to. But no such time actually exists, and all history is a lie. It is in fact this powerful but unprovable belief (faith) in some formerly unseen and better time that causes men in each new generation to never strive to achieve their own mutual perfection, always chasing the historical fallacy of their own tails of their forefathers without comprehension that they were already cut off and attainted at birth.

Below, I have accumulated the history of this last 10 or so years of my journey of discovery, evidential videos and articles of my strange path into the complete absurdity of legal fiction and finance and of the artifice of government. I have done this because, as this very well may be my last post on this blog and because I’m extremely tired and heavy-hearted, broken-hearted, I and am left wondering exactly what all this effort has been worth? Has it changed anything? Has it helped anyone? Have my heavy sacrifices all been in vain? And did I fool myself all this time into believing that I could change the world around me simply by uncovering the lies that surround our collective perception of what that world actually is?

I have raised about a quarter of what I need to raise in order to print in soft-cover book format the conclusion to my life’s work and research. I fearfully anticipated that this would be the case, seeing so many come into this fold only to never find the support of those who praise, criticize, and complain the loudest. And so I am making here one last case, one last cry out for help from anyone who has found value and attained before unknown knowledge from my many works and years of writing, research, and film-making. There are again over 1,800 subscribers on this blog, and the site has had over 1,400,000 views according to its statistics. My movies have been watched by 100’s of thousands, with “Lethal Injection: The Story of Vaccination” for instance having 147,000 views alone, not counting the many mirrored copies and DVDs I encouraged folks to spread freely over Youtube and other outlets, which now cannot be counted.

I am left in awe by the thought of even asking humbly for $1 from each of you in appreciation of the hours, no, years, no, a third of my adult LIFE that it took for me to comprehend and create those documentary films and to research and construct this blog. I marvel at what I could do if I was funded and had a platform unbound by financial constraints, a dream perpetually unrealized by so many like myself, who die the most miserable and unsatisfied men without selling out in conformity to such prestigious powers that pretend to be.

And so I am asking, in this final effort, that anyone reading this please donate what you think my work might be worth. If each reader that subscribes here donated $10 or $20, the price of 2 or 4 of those daily doses of poisonous Starbucks coffees, then I could preserve my book in printed form and hopefully begin a new journey of activism incomparable to this one. And to anyone that seeks a copy of this work once printed, I am still offering it as a gift in exchange for a gift of $30, sort of like a pre-order. It will be printed. The only question is whether or not I must go into personal debt AGAIN just to get my work out there for free!

So please, let me know that all of this was not in vain.

For those unfamiliar with all of my past works, please see all the videos and links below, an incomplete accumulation to be sure but still the strange story of my life and research.

There was a time when I could not have imagined becoming so sensitive in my awareness, that I could actually figure out “the system” and then actually possess the answers to almost every reasonable and even unreasonable question put forward to me. Now that I have reached that point, standing on top of a giant pile of clarified stinky-smelly crap, I realize why so very few arrive here while navigating that shit-storm of false dialectics and popular opinion websites. For to know the Truth one must sacrifice themselves to that ultimate and undeniable Reality, feeling its every pain and pleasure while suffering all the depressions and detachments that naturally must accompany such a transition, for a sacrifice without the purest of Loving intent is merely a loss, a slaughter. One must criticize oneself to no end, realizing and then shedding any fictional notion of legitimacy in ones own employments, status, estate, and memberships. One must despoil any prestige one might profess and pretend. One must Truly take off all the make-up and clothing, all of the false and flattering titles and impressions, the false show and dressings, the pomp and circumstance, so as to finally see oneself in and only as a True Light. It is not as easy as looking in the mirror, for that reflection is always false, 2-dimentional, and without soul, Source, or sense. One must find oneself without such artificial means, no longer seeing without understanding and hearing without listening.

The Truth is not salable. It has no price tag. It cannot be valued in anything but what is the priceless Reality of Nature. Self-evident, Self-Existent Truth is timeless and always defensive, never offensive. It harms only lies and the liars who live by and trust in them. It needs nor requires no debate to Exist. The Truth may only offend fiction, lies, and false beliefs, all of which are offensive to the Truth, and all of which make up a citizenship.

The so-called “truth movement” doesn’t practice actual Truth-telling, for that would be unprofitable. It would require ego-death. It would require admission to our own volunteerism and use, which makes the commercial world go round. Even the principles (maxims) of law legally allow lies to be confirmed and ratified (legal) truths; for black to be white and left to be right, so long as that truth is constituted, contracted, confirmed, ratified, and made “legal,” then believed in (loved) and lived by in the performance debt of membership (citizenship).

Government can lie to the public, but the public cannot lie to government. This was the recent “excuse” offered in support of Hillary Clinton’s lies about her emails to the public.

—=—

There’s no particular penalty for lying to the publicunless the public get tired of it. But there’s a real penalty for lying to the FBI.”

—Senator Mitch McConnell, speaking on the known fact of Hilary Clinton’s lies to the public about her emails in 2016, speaking honestly to the public on CBS news

—=—

Remember, it is perfectly legal for anyone to lie to the public, including myself, Alex Jones and the rest of the mainstream (pretending to be alternative) media. Fox News even reestablished this fact in court! When your own senator comes out public to reveal that there is no law or sanction (punishment) for government (including a future presidential candidate) to lie to the public, how do you go on supporting and being a subject of that government, of that kingdom and its kings of lies?

Here’s an example of why corporations and agents of government have the right to lie to the public as “free speech” of “artificial persons,” but why “individuals” or “natural persons” (an oxymoron) can never lie to government (owner of the public persons/titles/statuses) we pretend to be.

—=—

But “Infowars” would never lie, right?

—=—

And to understand just what “ethics” is in government, and how the legislature actually has no watchers, but instead judge each other in their organized crime, see my expose here, which includes how much they pay themselves. I guarantee once you finish this article you will have no doubt why no actual ethics exist in government.

Blog Link: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2014/09/12/the-fallacy-of-congressional-ethics/

The “truth movement” does not preach to its listeners the virtue of being (living) at all times in the Natural Truth (within only Nature and under It’s Highest Laws), for then no one would be glued and listening to a damned artificial construct and machine receiver as if it were Real. No one would attach themselves to this fictional, illusionary, virtual online matrix, and would instead embrace their very own Nature and their place within it without such artifice and useless information. The war would only be to keep such information from being spewed in replacement of spiritually driven knowledge. Just as the Church never teaches the True poetic and parabolic verse of the Bible it claims to support and worship, political writers in their prose would never be paid and talking-heads would not be amplified if the subject was what the only self-existent, self-evident Truth actually is. I am a living testament to this fact. Stations and networks would collapse under the weight of deaf ears as we all went out to rediscover the calming frequencies of that uneventful silence of Nature again, the sounds of the True Design of Life uninterrupted by fictional and monetary considerations. Youtube addicts would recede from their electromagnetic programming waves in dark basements and seek instead the tides of the oceans, sunny beaches, and vegetable gardens without commerce. Youtube would be replace with you- topiary. No one would allow themselves to be employed (used in agency as a tool) by another ever again, working only the land for themselves and toward the enrichment and nurturing (True wealth) of all others, realizing the most important Truth that labor is property, and that methodically trading it for money is voluntarily a surrender to evil geniuses (devils); to men with contractual, corporate, artificial power to take what we so foolishly and willingly give. For we would realize that even as new forms of money are promoted to us by such outlets of supposed truth, from gold to “Bitcoin” to the already developing international cashless society of global commerce, that all forms of money require respect and love (belief in) the valuation of that form of money upon all things, that Life and Nature itself can be valued in money, and that money or what it is traded for is never the property of the petty user. To love the pretended substance of money when in Reality it exists only in empty form is the root of all evils. This is the only Truth about money, for that which is not of self-evident Truth cannot ever Exist in any permanence of foundation, but rather only in a purposefully and carefully controlled chaotic flux managed by its demented patenters. For though all things may be valued in moneymoney is always valued in nothing. This is a maxim (principle) of law. What is valued in money is always corrupted. It is the valuation of the name, the form, the use, and the insurable appearance, but never the substance, the source, and the soul. This is mammon…being not merely that specific tool of money, but the artificial valuation of that which is the priceless, timeless wonder and beauty of Nature. The turning of Source into re-source, including governments corporate structure of commercial human resource management that we call as public citizenship but which is really modern feudalism. Only a slave romanticizes his own enslavement. Only a slave worships and even votes for his next master.

Nature and all life within its realm is priceless, but it may be destroyed when the valuation of mammon is placed upon its bounty, and thus by the mercenaries (soldiers for hire’s) hand it may be sacrificed in pointless slaughter for a price and without Love and respect for its Laws. The soldier is like any other employee in contract to do as his principal instructs and pays for. Of course, the word soldier comes from the Latin word solidus, which was a Roman gold coin. A soldier is a mercenary for pay. There is no other Truth. If that somehow offends you, then you must consider that the undeniable, self-evident Truth offends you. And you may then continue consciously lying to yourself. Pretend all you want that these men aren’t induced into contract with the state to kill and given bonuses, benefits, pensions, and a paycheck.

In the so-called truth-movement, the worst kinds of men are celebrated as “true” heroes. The beauty of finding the only Truth of the Nature of all things is that no longer can words, names, titles, and actions like cold-blooded murderer for pay be twisted into some governmental and propagandist actuarial report and then claimed to be an act of honor. A killer for hire has no honor, even and especially when he is wrapped in the American flag of maritime commerce and war. Give me a militia man fighting for his and his like-minded neighbor’s homeland, family, and spiritual freedom from government without consideration of money and I will show you all respect for that man’s actions. But, as the Bible continuously warns, I will never respect any man due to his false and flattering title of authority, nor his actions taken cowardly there under its artificial persona and protection. There is also no excuse to break the Highest Law of Nature, especially the excuse of that root of all evil and the authority of men in false, fictional, legally flattering titles.

But then, I would need here to show you my huge research project called Cracking The Cult Of The Constitution, perhaps some of my most important work, before this patriotic nonsense and support of that which domestically enslaves us under the Leiber Code could be broken. For a civil war is a war of words, names, and titles, not of men. And the American civil war never ended. I’d have to show you the congressionally confirmed and ratified presidential dictatorship that is the Executive CEO and CIC (president) under emergency military rule before you could see that our military is occupying our civil society and protecting government and its private, landholding bloodline from the multitude of us:

Blog Link: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2013/08/05/cracking-the-cult-of-the-constitution-part-i/

Blog Link: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2013/08/13/cracking-the-cult-of-the-constitution-part-ii/

What use is all the gold and oil in the land when the land itself is becoming so polluted and useless that no amount of money can be used to fix it? What use is money if it is not being used to ensure the wealth of all others and to protect the Source of our very own Existence and best interests? What is money without equitableness, without adherence to the Natural Law that forbids such accumulation of wealth beyond need or measure at the expense of all others?

The only Truth about money, the only final winning argument in any monetary debate, is the simple and obvious self-evident conclusion that money is not Real. It is not of Nature; not of Source. No matter how you may cleverly try to justify its existence and its use by some pretended, always fluctuating, temporary value made up by bankers in their own fictional realm, its value can never escape that fictional realm. It is not money that money is evil, but the love (belief) it causes in men to value all things within its purview, even other men as purchasable slaves. This is the temporary power of mammon (valuation) to cause permanent, controllable insanity in “civilized” men.

I believe it is time for me to step away from this nonsensical movement and its pointless, fruitless debates and platforms, a propaganda machine in and of itself that promotes the waving of the national flag (and its law of the sea) of a district of pirates that has kidnapped and interned us all through birth registration and certification with the intent to cause escheat and steal all of our inheritable land. Yet we worship it as if it were a god, even above and totally against the Word in the Bible, the very essence and foundation of the common law. It’s design is to fictionally, “legally” corrupt our blood so that we may never be the prodigal sons we are bloodborn to be. We may never protect the lands of our ancestors, for no heirs are recognized by law, by blood, for no one is being born outside the trappings of the imposts of that national system and district. That which is artificial has no blood, thus he who is surety to some United States person (legal status) certainly has no blood right.

The United States is a horrific corporate machine where the “Made In America” symbol and flag is shamelessly placed upon slave-labor products made in its own federal prisons. Yet no one seems to mind or complain. It is a commercial black hole that promotes legal (artificial) liberty while in reality only offers a commercial franchise called a national citizen-ship that is denizened and so voluntarily incorporated in agency, barely one step above involuntary slavery.

I see no point in documenting the corruption of this strange society in its purposefully induced ignorant state any longer, for the crimes of its agencies and practitioners are never punished, only talked about and loosely recorded as “truth” in the buttcrack of some conspiracy website. The so-called “infowar” is just what its title exclaims it to be, a battle to put worthless, fictional information into each of our collective heads in a total abandonment of God’s Law and Nature. And yet nowhere in all of this supposed truth-telling (convincing us that black is indeed white and left is surely and legally right) are to be found the Laws of Nature, the moral and spiritual Laws that defeat the false powers and corruption of information and mammon, showing it to be merely the artful renditions of the tribe of the name (noun), as fictional persons (corporations), places (legal jurisdictions), and things (property). All of Nature has been re-named (nouns), and so all of Nature has been fictionalized and registered (taxed) by its name (information). The Infowar is not a charitable and loving action of men, but exists only as a for-profit corporation; an artificial person seeking gain by the spread of the useless information of the fictional designs of men. It’s talking heads cannot save you or I, for the only savior is each of our True Selves in our own actions (works) under the Natural Law, under the example of christ. And only the unattained True knowledge of what is the self-evident Truth of Nature both realized and uninterrupted by fictional concepts of the fruit of the tree of conceptual acknowledgement of good and evil will solve any fictional problem. There are only two issues, what is Real and what is artificial (art) posing as Reality. The solution is so simple it hurts, for it is merely to stop respecting art over the Reality it legally, artificially represents. In a nutshell, this is all the scriptures teach us, which is why the church doesn’t ever teach the Bible but instead its own doctrines that justify its corporate existence against the Bible.

I wrote about this strange time we live in, calling it The Great Disclosure, wherein corruption and greed are coming out of the closet and avoiding all consequences, thanks to the information fad. For knowledge of evil without action against it is acknowledgment of evil. Silence is consent. Inaction is the greatest of sins. The word sin (syn) means to be with anything. To be unopposed in our actions is to be in syn-thesis with it, to be in allowance and toleration of that evil thing. This is the state of the “union,” a common people standing with its government no matter what it does. A nation of syn (sin).

Blog Link: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2013/06/03/the-great-disclosure/

Blog Link: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2013/06/26/the-great-disclosure-as-informed-consent/

And of course none of this would be possible without the advent of social media, a virtual matrix designed for this very purpose, to disseminate information without consequential intent.

Blog Link: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2013/02/26/social-media-the-simulation-of-action/

Along the way, as all this nonsense was rearing its ugly head for what it is, I began to study the words of this legalistic system of commerce, find words like redemption and being saved attributed to money, the god of nations in trust to mammon. I sought to find the True and Natural Law meaning of these words, knowing that no redemption or solution can ever be found through the emptiness of monetary inducements. And so I began in my first real effort to compile and decipher the words of King Jame’s purposefully misleading English (dog-Latin) translation of the Bible, witnessing how the legal language is a matrix code standing in substitution and artificial representation of the Bible code (Law). To this end, I compiled Cracking The Legal Code Of King James:

Blog Link: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2014/04/30/cracking-the-legal-code-of-king-james/

And that was when I realized we were all in hell…

Hell – The name given to a place under the exchequer chamber, where the king’s debtors were confined. Rich. Diet. (Black’s Law 4rth Edition) (Balentines Law, 3rd Edition)

–=–

What is citizenship if not an open air prison for debtors? Same system, different name. Wrap the American flag around it and you have yourself a party in hell for patriotic debt-slaves!

Let us be clear… this alternative media disclosure of information is not an awakening, and this religious notion that “truths” and “patriots” are woken up is pure nonsense. To wake up from the American dream (nightmare) is to fall hard back into Nature, into what is Reality. Political and monetary “knowledge” is false, and is not an awakening, especially when one still participates in that which he has supposedly woken up from. Don’t kid yourselves. This information war and disclosure without consequence is merely an admission of organized crime, of the lies of liars, where the criminals continue unabated despite such disclosure. Information awareness causes informed consent at best, complacency and apathy at the worst. And the best place for criminals (devils/attorneys) to operate is out in the open, where their deeds are seen, known, and accepted in the light.

Thus our “choice” for president is between two criminals that have outed each other as the liars and criminal element they are, pretending all that information is null once the fictional campaign reaches the primary. There is no choice, for a True choice would include “NONE OF THE ABOVE,” not merely a pick of two or more evils. And if you do not vote, you still have made a choice. Disclosure of information is certainly not a cure for the disease, and in fact it promotes the disease by promoting the perceived helplessness of those who absorb the lies and crimes without taking action. This “infowar” is not for the purposes of lawful prevention but of mass-programming, a manipulation of the publicly perceived normalcy-bias of we, the public-minded commoners towards acceptance of that openly organized crime syndicate, which is merely business (commerce) as usual. Even the devil pretends to be as the light, and uses the legal system and law to flatteringly title himself as such. In legal land, satan is God. Lies are truth. Dark is light. Slavery is freedom (franchise). Perpetual war is peace. Fear is happiness. The God of Nature is dead.

And the patriotic course is of course to seek remedy and solution from the very source and protection racket of that syndicate, the court system, by finding some imaginary trust and investment scheme we can all tap into. Money is the savior, a compensation for being tossed into this debtors hell. Perhaps its time to raise the “bar” a bit and stop seeking justice from corruption and salvation from artifice in mammon?

A quick browsing of the Infowars website reveals nothing of the spirit, nothing of the True knowledge, merely more fruit of the conceptual tree of good and evil. And the “fans” eat it up, for a scholar and even a half-way decent researcher could not help but to find eventually such informational “truth” to be mostly false, opinionated fear mongering designed to sell products specifically tailored to novel fear sales campaigns. At the website we find threats of impending doom via yet unrealized events such as “World War III” along side advertisements for survival products and guns. We spread the fear of nuclear weapons and the Fukushima radiation hoax if you are not trying to sell the besets, top quality, high performance, ultra purified, super-duper, fuck yeah iodine supplements at the same time?  Fear and sex certainly sell, and Mr. Jones certainly ain’t too sexy for his shirt, having a face special ordered for radio. His Zionist ex-wife insists on what a “good actor” he really is though.

And so fear is all he can peddle while promoting what he used to preach against, his “info-babes” and graphic backdrops. Most new Infowariers (fans) never saw or choose not to remember when Jones reported over a decade ago on the info-babes of Fox News and other mainstream outlets, with their bodacious ta-ta’s hanging out while they reported the so-called “news.” Now he’s promoting it. They don’t remember or choose not to remember when Jones reported on the graphics and satanic studio mnemonics that were flashed all over the mainstream screen and logos. Today, Jones uses similar mnemonics as his background graphics. He promotes christian values along side free-market capitalism, as if money (mammon) and commerce was ever a value put forward by christ. He reports on the enemy (our government) while waving its national flag of nativity, never teaching the difference between territory (land in Nature) and nationality (fictional hell). The Infowars site continuously promotes idiotic protests at the Republican Convention, not for any reason but that they are easy prey, easily picked apart, guaranteed to produce usable media footage of rebels without an actual cause or clue, and easily instigated by Jones to cause a small riot.

But then, one must ask exactly what is the purpose of this self-titled “infowar” if not disclosure without consequence, considering that nothing has ever been changed or corrected that is reported there, that no prisoners have been taken, nor any battles won because of that non-vetted, Youtube created, totally illegitimate and outside of the custody-chain of legally accepted evidence and at best third-party “information” that is never going to be acceptable in any legitimate court of law. But it’s all apparently good enough for the fools who support that info clearing house, for those who are caught up in their own info-prison-planet paradigm.

And so we search and find at these information sites only feul for the fire of informational consumerism and manufactured consent, creating an “informed” audience that actually believes they can prepare for modern warfare and zombies with the same outdated weapons, guns, and ammunition that their own government unlawfully traffics openly to all of its third world enemies in foreign countries without fear of those now primitive weapons compared to the fourth and fifth generation warfare tactics and weapons of today. Might as well be sticks and stones, but the infowar sponsors will sell them to you for much more than they are worth! To be informed by Infowars is like being an expert in video games, having knowledge only of the foundations of fiction and virtual reality while having no ability to survive the winter without government subsidies and on-grid benefits. But the games are played on government owned and militarily occupied fields and municipalities, and only with governments permission.

And so, naturally, we find more paradoxical behavior there in Jones’ paradigm support of a presidential candidate that represents one of the completely private associations (artificial persons) called the “Republican Party,” despite the fact that Jones claims himself to be “Libertarian.” (I suggest doing a search for “libertarianism and satanism” and see what pops up as to who created that political ideology!) But wait a minute! What happened to the left-right paradigm, Alex? When did Infowarriers become part of the right against left fiction? Turns out paradoxes can exist after all!

And yet nowhere do we find the Truth about these presidential elections, which is that the common people Jones preaches his disinformation to do not even elect the president. Voting is not, after all, electing. Two different words there. Having covered this subject and how the electoral college elects the president so many times here on this blog, we find this particular Truth avoided so that the dramatic story of the “rigged election” process may unfold and be repeatedly told to sell more products to support the infowar, just as it is in mainstream news outlets; inducements for readers and subscribers to purchase more worthless “health” and “survival” products to support the infowar paradigm. Why would the very man who coined the phrase “left-right paradigm” support the right against the left, when we know its all the same team? Because both of these candidates are his bloodline, Clinton and Trump standing united in blood but divided for public show. How many times do you need to hear Ales Emetic Jones speak about his bloodline relationship to the “People” who founded this nation before you realize that Jones is on their side, and that their side is opposed to yours?

It’s the same old story, as every president including the “white person” renamed “Obama” of the white (Jewish) Dunham clan of landholders are proven to be of the same line. And the opposing candidate is always a cousin. It’s always a choice between family members.

I spent a whole year researching and collecting genealogical records, becoming an addiction towards the end, and discovering a hidden class that can only be compared to the movie “They Live” running the entire political, corporate, and religious show:

Blog Link: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2014/01/13/how-all-presidents-are-related-to-king-john/

Blog Link: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2015/12/03/new-election-same-old-blood/

Blog Link: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2012/11/06/my-concession-for-the-procession-of-imbeciles/

Blog Link: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2012/12/24/understanding-the-2012-electoral-college/

Blog Link: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2016/01/29/how-elections-really-work/

As many readers have difficulty comprehending the bloodline issue, though EVERY OTHER COUNTRY IN THE WORLD is inherited by the heirs of the blood, here is my earlier compilation of research, with many links, along with an over 4 hour radio presentation on the subject accounting for months and months of research into the subject.

Blog Link: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2013/02/04/a-world-without-gray-episode-2-special-edition/

And of course, when we truly see beyond the vail of that left-right paradigm that the Infowar has apparently and conveniently forgotten about, we see that the Republican Party is merely the Democrat party in disguise…

Blog Link: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2016/04/28/republican-national-party-is-member-of-international-democrat-union-idu/

But the Real Truth is that we are battling only ourselves like pawns on a chessboard, for we are participating in and respecting nothing but fictional events (the history of fictional persons, places, and things) on the Roman calendar. We romanticize everything until its actuality is indistinguishable from its embellishments, and we call it the truth. We lend credibility to such artifices as elections, in turn giving them a false sense of legitimacy (truth) as we lust after our own franchised stake within it. Yet we never seem to notice that there is no box to check NO. Choose is yes or no, not Trump or Clinton. But the illusion of choice is certainly baked into our brains by the infowar, making this causality of a certainty of two evils appear as if “the people” in common have spoken. And the billions spent in media and advertising keep up appearances though the modern feudal system never changes. It cannot change, for it is built (constituted) into the very law we foolishly and ignorantly respect. And the bloodline always wins every election, even as these latest of two cousins by the same grandmother pretend to compete with each other while promising their feudal tenants change we can be made to believe in. Of course in technology circles (i.e. artificial information), the word “change” comes from the word “delta,” which in the Brave New World model are the working class of slaves to the Alphas and Betas, not quite bright enough to see their designs and content in their institutionalized feudalistic form of happy slavery. OF course, only a slave votes for a master, and only he who has turned away from God seeks any such artful master.

The infowar’s greatest design is to cause all men to suffer each other’s collective inaction. It puts us all into our own form of artificial political party, with leaders more corrupt than those it exposes for profit. The group mentality, above all else, is pushed therein. And so as long as it appears that the group, the subscribers, the membership is waking up due to such a randomized oil spill of informational nothingness by the “truth party” leaders, individual action is thwarted, even as personal power is cowed by that prison of mental programming.

As to the only True power any man has, I decided to examine and re-write my own individual declaration of independence, with a comparison of current events and power structures that so far surpass the original that its authors would be ashamed to call us their sons and daughters. As long as we collectively toss our personal power into a group setting and then allow that group mentality to decide for us how our personal power should be utilized, we might as well admit that we are individually powerless and that our will or God’s shalt never be done. But its easier this way, right? Easier to just go with the flow, to grow with the seeds of corruption planted for us as our own garden (prison)?

For that theft of personal will and power is the Real power of political parties. Apparently “infowarriors” are “republicans” this time around, and the True nature of that political party paradigm be damned as they collectively support this current, prestigious representative of the bloodline despite the cognitive dissonance they must be feeling.

Blog Link: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2012/12/28/a-new-declaration-of-independence-for-free-men/

The harshest and most outward Truth is that most people in this war of information do not seek the Truth, for the Truth would actually set them free into Nature, taking them out of their security of legal franchise in personhood (legally granted and enforced “freedom” under dominion of the landlords), and the illusions preferred by such an information matrix as a virtual reality is much easier to accept than facing the Truth without such insurance and security of the church and state. For the Truth is only what is Real, what is of Nature, what is self-evident and self-existent, and therefore it is only what is not a fictional creation and invention of mans imagination. In this way, what we call as the agreed upon legal “truth” of information can be blamed for our own actions and inactions, allowing us to ignore our responsibilities to thwart such evil (artifice) and lies. And we get the added bonus of this imaginary enemy, the invented cause of all of our problems, as we pretend that we have no choice but to follow our leaders. We scream for a “voluntary society,” ignoring in an almost institutional way that all of our actions are in fact voluntary, and that participation in legal, contractual citizenship is certainly, under the doctrine of volunteerism (master and servant), a voluntary state of artificial being.

—=—

“The rights of the individuals are restricted only to the extent that they have been voluntarily surrendered by the citizenship to agencies of government.

—City of Dallas v Mitchell, 245 S.W. 944

—=—

As the song goes, “No one can take away your right to fight and to never surrender.” But ask any anarchist for their excuse for volunteering and following the legal law in personhood is because if they don’t they will be harmed somehow. Some even claim there is an imaginary gun to their head 24/7, that all services are provided by government with a gun forcing them to partake in it. But the Truth is that unless you are willing to die for what you believe in (love), unless you are willing to kill to protect your beliefs (loves), then you are just full of shit. Citizenship is a surrender of unalienability. It is a turning away from God and Natural Law. There is no excuse before the God of Nature or before a magistrate judge (legal god), for ignorance is no excuse to break any Law, including Nature’s. Pretending that we are not voluntarily participating in the adversarial evils of legalism doesn’t make it the Truth. You could fight, you could never surrender, but then your licenses and privileges (franchise freedom) might be taken away. It’s time to grow up and stop lying to ourselves that we are being forced. It’s a self-decieving lie built of fear and spiritual uncertainty and nothing more. No one can take away your right to fight and to never surrender. Fighting and surrendering are always voluntary acts. And no one is ever forced to be in public citizenship (voluntary servitude).

–=–

“So, we have all over today all kinds of cliques and clans and sects. We have anarchists and activists all fightingreally, over the same thing. All actually missing the point; missing the real point of the whole thing, being thatTruth makes peaceerror makes lawIf the individual understands the facts of his own faith correctlyhe will discover the faiths of all others. But if he becomes merely a bigot of his own, and intolerant of all that he does not believe to be true, then when he attacks the other persons belief he is only attacking his own belief under a different name.

—Manly P. Hall, from a recorded lecture on “Language: the Use, Misuse and Abuse of Words”

–=–

And so instead of unvolunteering we instead demonize that which we in fact continuously volunteer to support. We vote for our masters even as we call them criminals, which can only really mean that we get what we deserve. And if we do not vote, if we do not make a choice, and at the same time still volunteer to be subjects of government in citizenship, we still have made a choice, the choice of the actual electors in a rigged election. We go through these motions even as they call themselves as the worst criminals in their political, primetime debates. We allow them to steal from us because it is voluntary and legal according to their own legislated codes, through taxation and other forms of exaction and extortion. For while contracting and acting in U.S. and other national, commercial citizen-ships (vessels) is easily proved to be a voluntary commercial franchise (legal freedom), the law applied to said citizen-ship is not voluntary. For as the maxim (foundational principle) of law states, to know the law and to be bound under the law are the same thing in consideration of the agents (judges) and creators (magistrate gods) of law.

For instance, since the principles of law also state that ignorance of law is never an excuse, ignorance of this completely feudal part of the U.S. Code is no excuse for any man participating voluntarily. You better learn real quick that these are your rights when voluntarily acting in the person of the nation (district)!!!

–=–

42 U.S. Code § 1981 – Equal rights under the law

(a) Statement of equal rights

All persons within the jurisdiction of the United States shall have the same right in every State and Territory to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, give evidence, and to the full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings for the security of persons and property as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishmentpainspenaltiestaxeslicensesand exactions of every kindand to no other.

–=–

EXACTION:

“Torts. A willful wrong done by an officer, or by one who, under color of his office, takes more fee or pay for his services than what the law allows. Between extortion and exaction there is this difference; that in the former case (extortion) the officer extorts more than his duewhen something is due to himin the latter (exaction)he exacts what IS NOT HIS DUEwhen there is nothing due to him.

–Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856, commissioned as an official dictionary of congress

–=–

Exaction (the worst kind of extortion) is your legal right, like it or not. It is an executively enforced right of personhood. And every citizenship shares that right equally. It is a requirement of every public citizenship. And though we complain fervently about such extortion as taxation and “fees” and “penalties” as exaction, we never seem to acknowledge the fact that the U.S. Code states clearly that it is our enforced and involuntary “RIGHT” to be exacted, taxed, put in pain, punished, exacted, etc. And we pretend that we have free speech as we complain, even when we are writing out our checks to the IRS and other agencies of government, fulfilling our right to be exacted from and giving agencies and their agents what is not their due, just as the kings and publicans (tax-collectors) of old. Rights are voluntarily accepted as mandatory in exchange for allegiance and submission to all other laws and the benefits and protections they afford. This is well established as a maxim and foundation of law. A right granted by any person, place, or thing (legal noun/name/title) is not a self-existent, self-evident God-given Right. It is not unalienable, but rather requires the lien of surety bondage of citizenship. It is contractual. And contracts are always voluntary, though their terms are restrictive and enforceable. The devil can only defeat a man of God with words, and citizenship is nothing more than a legally binding contract – a performance debt.

The Truth of Nature is now being customarily augmented just as much by Poki-mon monsters as it is with the lies of attorneys, politicians, and priests. And all media outlets are there to keep us interested, attached, and plugged-in to the information game. To pretend to be on the alternative or pretended truthful side of information is no different that being in on a lie. To pretend that alternative news is anything but information about confirmed and ratified lies called as legal truths is the first circle of hell. And to argue over what is good and sound money practices is the foundation of hell, a worshiping and respect of mammon and its artificial matrix of monetary valuation. For money can only be justified if slavery is justified, if everything in Nature is assigned a legal name or title, and the name is valued in mammon, taking away the True Freedom of all Life and Source, turing God’s Creation into a re-source of man. Only then is a valuation placed upon the priceless Nature of self-existence. And this is the harshest Truth of all. For one cannot Truly take sides in a “war” over information, for all information is merely coded and organized words, never actual Source. A war of words (information) will lead to nowhere, yet has the potentiality to cause men to destroy all Life so as to fulfill that war. Only then can the infowar be won, for there would be no beings left to distill and distribute such artificial things and words. The info would die with its source, mirroring the death and finally decayed madness of unspiritual men. Fiction may only destroy man if man allows fiction to rule his mind. Man may only destroy his own Nature if he continues to fall pray to this war of artificial information.

Perhaps the most painful Truth to finally comprehend is also the most obvious and ironic one. For there is a very good reason that the infowar stays only in the info (legal fiction) realm and never in the realm of action, a reason that is self-evident when the question of what is government finally becomes clear and is able to be considered by men bound to the Natural Law without vain patriotic accouterments in support of fictions and legalistic laws and licensure. The infowar stays out of the courts, out of the legal system, because a judges’ (legally entitled artificial person’s) first duty is to protect its principal employer, the very government it represents and holds its authority in flattering title from. In other words, no judge will rule against government or its members and sovereign magistrates or “People” because no judge can put the United States in harm’s way.

The judge protects the government from us, not us from government. No decision that would, for instance, cause rioting in the streets will ever be opinionated in any majority or precedent-setting ruling, unless that is the desired goal in order to cause more heavy-handed executive agencies and legislation. Organized crime will never rule against its own syndication, against the very incorporation that gives it its own false authority. If the nation wishes to have civil war, it will have it. All it needs to promulgate is the proper false information to its unwitting citizen-ships, the vessels of commerce that do not recognize their own voluntary enslavement and servitude.

And so obviously the events of 9/11 will not be pinned on government as an “inside job” by the very magistrate judges that corporation nation employs! Duh! How many countless hours do so many “truthers” expend delving into the actual events of September 11th, 2001, as if nothing else happened on that day? How much energy is put forward in exposing the information of that “event” without ever actually doing anything about it? How many criminal connections have been made to the very politicians in office at that time, and how many of them have been executed for treason or been placed in jail or banished? The infowar ensures that only information disclosure but never action takes place, as if we are sitting in an imaginary coliseum cheering for the sign from Caesar to punish or kill the gladiators. But Caesar is the District, and it will never give itself the accusatory thumb. It judges itself, for its judges are gods, and gods can only exist through nations.

I guarantee you that the end of this road towards the discovery or just what is Truth does not end with any .com, .info, or .org titleand especially not with a .gov disposition. When one finally sees only the Truth and knows it instinctually and as totally distinguishable from artifice, it is always recognizable and cannot be mis-taken for anything but It’s own Nature of self-evidence and self-existence. For it is Pure in its Nature. It is all aspects of True Existence; a Oneness that Exists despite man’s names, titles, numerals, or symbols used to fictionally define It. And it is only when the Real outweighs and crushes any artificial valuation and name (noun) placed upon it by man that one finally sees the Truth.

The only question that remains is how do we Live only in Truth, in only our spiritual Nature, without the pretended power of that artifice of informational nonsense?

As for myself, I remember fervently debating over the concept of “sound money” for many years. The word sound carries the meaning of stability, which money by design has and can have none of, except in its ultimately temporary life and valuation, which is always in Truth an absolute nothingness. Its value is only as sound as the sand running out of the hourglass, for like the hourglass, money is merely a design of man’s imagination. Money is nothing more than a belief system, a religious faith in it as a god (creator), not a self-evident Truth. It is a creation of man, not of God’s Nature and Source, and so it can never exist in self-evident Reality. What is money today may be fuel for a depressive or inflation fire tomorrow. Money of yesterday is used for wallpaper today, if it is not worshiped vainly as somehow more artificially valuable than its face once re-presented. Tomorrows money will be touted as the cure for todays monetary dis-ease, though like any pharmaceutical remedy it will only replace one dis-ease with another set of symptoms. And these new symptoms will be compounded as the new name of the same old dis-ease in that perpetually mind-numbing monopoly game of mammon. Money, you see, is also merely empty and falsified information. And that’s why, like the priests of all denominations of disinformation-spewing, legally incorporated churches, the Infowar corporation seeks money in everything it does. It’s an information exchange network. It sells lies told as truths in exchange for the biggest and most brilliant lie of all, that of monetary wealth.

What is sound is what everything should be built upon. A foundation. When a society’s foundation is built upon money, upon commerce, then it is built upon nothing of substance. It will crumble. It has to. For its foundation is temporary, as all things called as money are. Its reality will be informationally and technologically (artfully) augmented so that it appears more virtually appealing to its volunteerest, as modernized feudal subjects, appearing falsely to be more close to the Truth of the Reality of Nature than it ever can be. And like children in want of our slightly out-of-reach and dirty pacifier, we will feed on its murky artifice. We will take the artificial teat of government as our mother, a fictional, protective, artificial womb (matrix) that is as paper thin as the money it projects to insure us. When the root of all evil is our insurance policy, our foundation, our security, then our existence can only be as the minions of a debtor’s hell.

With all of that said, the reader of this will likely call me a hypocrite in my seeking the charitable contributions of those who are reading this. I accept that. I cannot deny that I am in such a terribly unavoidable disposition that my work cannot be printed in any Real aspect so as to protect it from being just digital, erasable information. I cannot deny that I am asking for money while exclaiming the less than virtuous nature of its artifice. I am fully aware of this dichotomy, and it pains me to no end.

However, I seek no gain from this request. I seek no fame or fortune. I don’t even seek money, except to pass it from your individual hands to the book-printers hands. This money is not for me, it is for the preservation of knowledge attained by one of you, one who actually did wake up from the information war and was able to explain it for future generations so that they do not fall for such fictional, satanic designs ever again, never falling pray to the fake infowar as our own egos have. I simply wish to print my books privately without publishing them, so that they can never be claimed as government property, and thus subsequently shelved or burned at 451 fahrenheit.

To this end, I have offered the first volume of this work for free, as I have done and will do with all of my work both past and in the future. Volume II is nearing completion, and will blow this first foundational work out of the water.

Please download my first volume here:

Book Link: http://www.strawmanstory.info

In celebration of my own journey, a path and learning curve that many reading this are also on or in the middle of, I offer the following video testimony of my own path in hopes that it will help you on yours.

Here I offer a walkthrough of my activist efforts that were caught on camera or microphone. These are fond memories of pointless rhetoric done to support the information war. They are personal reminders of how enslaved we really are, pretending to have free speech while being mildly tolerated by those that grant it only to themselves. Recognizing myself not as the hero but as the slave in these seemingly victorious encounters is that change of perspective that needs to happen with each of us.

—=—

“The American people don’t believe anything until they see it on television.”

–Richard M. Nixon, U.S. president

—=—

To start with, here is one of my latest interviews on Leak Project. I don’t often like to use video, but here is the tip of the iceberg of my latest work. And hey, it all must be true because its on truth TV, right?

—=—

When I first moved to the Salt Lake City area about seven years ago, after being an active member of We Are Change Los Angeles and thus leading me to a life of full-time research and activism, we formed and grew the Utah chapter of We Are Change, soon after holding a conference with Luke Rudkowski and many great (and as it turns out not so great) speakers. Live and learn…

—=—

One of those speakers, though all other footage and recordings were lost, was Professor Steven Jones:

–=–

And a photo opportunity at the end…

—=—

With support, this would have been a great event. And I would love to do this again after pulling this one off logistically without flaw. But with no support, it is now only a lost memory. Again, to imagine what I could do if not constrained by money… that is perhaps the worse feeling in the world.

Note: As embarrassing as it is to ask, if anyone has any footage from this conference please link it below in the comments or send me an email. This was the first of two different conferences with We Are Change Utah where the footage was magically “disappeared.” Thanks.

As a newby in the radio circuit, and because of the nature of the strange “beehive” culture in Utah, I could not then get the support by local radio or groups, and so the attendance was very low. I paid for this conference out of my own pocket, a debt that I though would be worth it because we had recorded the event. Unfortunately, the person that volunteered to come up from Texas to recored it worked as a host for GCN, and he either purposefully or accidentally lost all the footage. He did this after we had requested Alex Jones to support and host the conference, to which he refused. And so for my debt, for my efforts, I have jack shit to show for it accept the gratefulness of those few who attended. I am, to say the least, suspicious of what happened. And to make things worse, one of my trusted WAC members stole the little money we did bring in. But on a brighter note, this got me noticed by the local radio.

As the Tea Party movement was strong then (2010), and as Sheriff Mack was one of my speakers, the BBC came to interview myself and Mack for a documentary they were creating on the Tea Party movement. While Mack ended up making a fool of himself as he fell pray to the clever interviewer, thus making it into the final documentary as what can only be called as a portrayed imbecile and fool of the “patriot movement,” they didn’t quite know what to do with me and my answers. They couldn’t pin me to any side or party. I was an anomaly.

—=—

Needless to say, this interview didn’t make into the final cut of their twisted documentary, and BBC in no way supported our conference despite our giving it free reign to interview and film our guest speakers and make idiots of them. My conference and myself was not included or promoted. And so the BBC just used me to get an interview with some of my guests, pretending to support my efforts. Such douchebaggery.

After the conference, we arranged to have a good ol’ fashioned street action and bannering of the freeway with our 9/11 big blue banners, where we were visited by some local police that acted admirably in our support.

—=—

Around that time we had also delivered the official dossier of evidence of 9/11 to the Attorney General of Utah Mark Shurtlif, who gleefully has been behind bars until recently as a criminal for corruption charges, along with his counterpart, former Attorney General Mark Swallow. Of course the Bar Association controls all attorneys and judges, so why would we possibly hope such protected crime would break the syndicalist stranglehold?

This was perhaps my favorite filmed confrontation, the best of in-your-face-when-you-least-expect-it guerrilla journalism, where I simply asked what the Attorney General had done with that officially received evidence, and he talked his arrogant self right into a corner. What transpired was priceless… but yet again pointless. Gotta love this one though!

—=—

For the benefit of the less than happy Attorney General (head devilmaster), I will provide the U.S. Code here that deals with devils that do not turn evidence over to a judge…

–=–

18 U.S. Code § 2382 – Misprision of treason

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 807Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994108 Stat. 2147.)

–=–

Guilty or not guilty? It ain’t your choice. It’s the private brotherhood of the Bar Association’s choice, and this man is its general!!!

Deal with it, subject!

To be fair, we did also arrange a legitimate sit-down interview where the Attorney could pretend to be lawful and legitimate and on the common people’s side, being the responsible activists we were:

—=—

But as for the “Tea Party Express,” a well-funded corporate sham, we attempted to participate and stand in unity with our supposedly celebrated “free speech” rights, while the fake Tea Party Express media heads shunned us and blocked our banners. You gotta see this to believe it. Exposing hypocrites was vastly becoming our community service and past time.

Of note here again, we see our sheriff’s officers acting with integrity and according to duty. Bravo!

—=—

The best part as always is the media spin at the end. Never was anything we did or protested reported on accurately or in context by the mainstream news outlets.

We Are Change made national news a few times here in Utah, but this one was certainly the best, most embarrassing, and most viewed. Unfortunately, the video of my own confrontation with congressman Chafetz on the CAFR issue is lost to the ether.

—=—

—=—

Of course, Chafetz had to rescind his comments made to us crazy conspiracy people once our little home video got loosed upon the national news.

—=—

Whenever we got the chance, we would hand out pamphlets and DVD’s or hold up our banners to cause irrational cognitive dissonance among the residents of this  “beehive” state. Like the postman, activism happens rain or shine!

—=—

Sometimes, though rarely, it was not us doing the confronting but in fact our query calling out our own shortcomings. Here Lord Monckton agreed to sit with us after his presentation at, where else, Utah University, shedding a light on the reasons why We Are Change and other outlets of so-called “truth” were failing miserably in actually getting anything done about it in court (in government). His perspective changed my whole outlook. As a former investigative agent himself in Britain, he corrected me and changed my own course, turning my own perceptions to where the problem actually lies… the false teachings and doomed efforts of the Infowar! Here he schools me to my own embarrassment on such legal notions of the chain of custody and chain of evidence, none of which the “truth” movement ever follows, leaving our so-called “evidence” worthless and unusable, let alone undocumented and untraceable. This was my first perception into the false dichotomy of shock jocks like Alex Jones, who does triple the harm as he ever does good, causing masses of activists to act unprofessionally and not according to the law, and so that nothing we do counts as truly usable evidence.

The following is in four parts, and features me still in my own cone of ignorance trying to make a difference. I value these moments to show how much I have grown both spiritually and in reasonability. It is a reminder of how we all live under false impressions, impressions that are institutionally ingrained by both educative and entertainment-based fallacy.

—=—

—=—

—=—

—=—

Other activist outings revealed more hard-to-stomach Realities that manifested in unlikely places. While outreaching in the airport as part of a national protest to the then new irradiated full body-scanners, we found out the hard way that free speech is a lie, is “not absolute,” and that we needed legal permits to have even limited free speech. But most of all, this was my first realization, on camera, that these guys were powerless to stop my speech unless I had one of their permits for speech. In other words, no contract, no unreasonable legal code. Permission and license is the opposite of Natural freedom, as is legal person-hood.

But what I got this head of police to say was priceless…

—=—

—=—

A short time after that, I was handcuffed for no reason at the same airport by an over zealous police officer for attempting to say no to both the full body scanner and the body search. What transpired was a hell of a story, which I documented here:

Blog Link: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2013/05/08/molested-my-unlawful-encounter-with-tsa/

For most of this time I had been mentoring with Walter Burien, who was teaching me about the Comprehensive Annual Financial Reporting system (CAFR) of all governments. Because I had quit my career as a sound engineer and designer to be an activist, I had the skills to help Walter make a documentary, and did so without pay. This was my first venture into documentary making, and my first time working charitably without expectation. And it felt wonderful!

Here is both the shorter trailer and the full movie:

—=—

—=—

From this effort, and from being able to spend so much time with Walter, I became a quick study and began my own film about everything I had learned and kept self-teaching. From this came “The Corporation Nation” series of documentaries, homemade in every way by yours truly. As I look back on this project, and as is shown in the first ten minutes of the movie, I really ended up making this because when I confronted the former Comptroller General of the United States about governments massive investment portfolio, as well as the incredible land and property holdings of the United States government collectively, he outright lied to my face over and over, even claiming that government was not a corporation! This pissed me off so much that it spawned whole The Corporation Nation series, all because of liars and the lies they tell.

—=—

In part two of The Corporation Nation I covered the pension system and its true purpose, showing government to hold mega-shares in just about all corporations around the world, the epitome of globalism having formed right under our noses. It took a four hour film to document this, with countless pictures used from the CAFR reports, showing officially that government not only owns shares in all corporations, but also votes as proxy shareholder voter for their boards of directors, for mergers and acquisitions, and other “corporate governance” issues. Talk about global empire and fascism!

—=—

When Jan Irvin started interviewing me as more and more radio shows wanted to hear what I had to say, I made this separate film to aid Jan in exposing his own school district, and in hopes that others might follow by utilizing the same information in their own local CAFRs. Besides these movies, I wrote dozens of blog articles detailing the CAFR swindle.

—=—

For those seeking an advanced lesson in the CAFR audit system, and to see how municipal cities, counties, and states are faking their bankruptcies, I wrote my first “book” on my blog, which I intend at some point to add to and print as well. That can be found here:

Blog Link: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2013/04/07/the-stockton-bankruptcy-lie/

As I became more advanced in my own knowledge and comprehension of the sheer nightmarish corruption displayed in these publicly available but unknown and publicly unread CAFR reports, my local activism revealed the Sheriff of Salt Lake County (and most other county sheriffs around the nation) to be at the pinnacle of this infiltration of Agenda 21 and globalist, United Nations switchover.

Here I expose “The Sheriff Who Sold His County” by revealing the non-governmental associations and special districts that are set up to exact and extort more and more money, in our case from what was officially called a “police protection fee” charged ultimately, indirectly to the property tax, where if that fee was not then paid, the county could steal people homes and property to pay the “fee” that they swear is not actually a “tax.” Like a complicated puzzle with thousands of indistinguishable pieces, I spent months and finally figured out this scam, somehow piecing it together. Here I attempt to teach the locals what the hell just happened!

—=—

I had several encounters with this corrupt county sheriff, the prodigal son of a Utah bloodline with seven generations of politicians that have no qualifications but their family name, a local dairy farm family that has put more than one independent farmer out of business by its political hold over this county.

Also during this time I was appearing occasionally on our local AM radio station (K-TALK 630AM), going against the grain and causing a stir in the hive mind. The sheriff that sold his county was good enough to grace us with an interview, where his true colors shown through. I wished at the time that I had actually figured out the whole scam by then, but I had not. Unwittingly though, this public spectacle by the sheriff helped me immensely to finally understand the whole scheme. He’s a slimy bastard.

The original article:

Blog Link: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2011/05/22/the-sheriff-who-sold-his-county/

The interview:

Blog Link: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2011/06/06/an-inteview-with-the-sheriff-who-sold-his-county/

Other confrontations were unfortunately not filmed, including one with the chief financial officer (CFO) of the county (note that CFO is only ever a corporate title).

Intermittent videos were made, short attempts to bring perspective to folks who knew all was wrong but couldn’t see it clearly…

—=—

After seeing the movie “Inside Job” narrated by bloodline family member Matt Damon, who actually pretending to give a shit, I did my best to call him out to so as to publicly announce the actual truth about what happened in 2008-9 with the so-called economic crash. Naturally, he did nothing. Here I show from my films how government owned all the banks that profited, merged, and crashed through stock investment, and we see the same thing with oil companies and water companies. It is this disconnect by the public that knows not government’s stake-holding in these corporations that must be corrected, so that the complete conflict of interest of the regulators owning the companies they regulate can be comprehended. And you wonder why the shareholder (government) of oil companies doesn’t force them to clean up their spills? That would be bad for governments investment profits of course, and a corporations highest concern by law is to please and profit its shareholders!

—=—

—=—

After years of research and comprehension, I have accumulated many articles on this blog about the CAFR reporting system. A large collection of most of those “CAFR School” blogs are linked here, along with a few radio shows about it:

Blog Link: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2014/01/20/cafr-school-week-on-the-corporation-nation-radio/

It cannot be stated here with any qualification how important this system of accounting for government corporations is. It is the holy grail of open secrets. It is a game-changer. It explains in full the corruption within government and the corporate world, two realms that are literally tied at the hip, and allows us to understand lobbying for what it really is. I have spent years trying to help others comprehend its structure, which is of course not meant to be understood by the public at all. Of all the links I have provided herein, this one is perhaps the most recommended, for it is a journey into all of my research on the subject of  this hidden in plain sight government accounting scheme. And its rules and best practices are currently being implemented on a global scale within all nations.

What the common citizen-ship agent does not realize is that he lives in a company store. Just as companies like the East and West India and Virginia Companies funded by the king were the true founders of the so-called colonies (plantations) of early America, we subsist today in a singular commercial company called the Untied States district and commercial jurisdiction amongst the other company stores of the United Nations. Most of us work for  some publicly traded and thus government owned corporation, manufacturing or otherwise producing its commercial products, and are paid in company script (U.S. currency) that allows no competition. We then spend that currency in any one of those government-held stock corporations, from grocery stores to gas stations, and in turn pay tribute (taxation) to the main company (district) and all its several franchise subsidiaries (legal state governments and agencies). This collaboration has become so obvious at this point that banks now simply collect property tax with our mortgage (dead pledge) payments. We live, work, and play in and on the persons, places, and things (patented nouns) of government. All of our property is its property, all the territory its land. We are the employees and tenants of a feudalistic company store, renamed as a commercial nation with “liberty” for all (in an open air debtor’s prison) designed to protect the pirates and private landholders (lords) that run it.

But, as we are not educated to recognize our place and status therein, it takes someone voluntarily removed from it like me over a decade to finally see this legal matrix code for what it is. And of course, this necessarily means that I am disenfranchised from every aspect of it I can be, for to see it one must have no interest in it. One can only see one’s false, legal id-entity when one destroys his ego and stops attempting to justify his legal, artificial character and existence. And perhaps the saddest part of all this is that I would not expect those receiving a pension from this monstrous company store, whose investments are in all the corporations and associations we complain about and which are the key to government holding stock and shareholder votes in those corporations, to give up their perceived “benefits” by being wed to such a devilish partner.

Samuel Johnson, in his rather curt and unabashedly honest dictionary of 1755, defined a pension as:

PENSION – An allowance made to any one without an equivalent. In England, it is generally understood to mean pay given to a state hireling for treason to his country(Samuel Johnson’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1755)

–=–

But what truly is this allowance given to a group of the agents (employees and citizenships) of government that would betray their very own best interest and that of God’s Nature itself? What does government accomplish by this actuarial retirement scheme? What crimes does it get away with merely because it allows profit-sharing to its employees for foolishly allowing government to invest in the worst possible corporations throughout the world?

ALLOW – verb transitive – [Latin locoto laysetplaceSee Lay.] 1. To grantgive or yieldasto allow a servant his libertyto allow a pension. 2. To admitasto allow the truth of a propositionto allow a claim. 3. To admitto own or acknowledge; as, to allow the right of the President to displace officers. 4. To approvejustify or sanction. Ye allow the deeds of your fathers. Luke 11:48. Romans 8:1. 5. To affordor grant as a compensation; as, to allow a dollar a day for wages. 6. To abate or deduct; as, to allow a sum for tare or leakage. 7. To permitto grant license toasto allow a son to be absent(Webs1828)

–=–

The middle and above middle class public pensioner is always the loudest to cry foul at government handouts to the poorest and most destitute of people, claiming this action of actual charity to be equal to the robbing of the taxpayer money coffers. Imagine discovering that this is pure hypocrisy, and that most of them don’t even know it themselves! For it is actually the pensioner that lives in robbery of the taxpayer coffers, in a self-deluded ignorance, as I have shown through primary evidence. Turns out that infinitely more amounts of taxpayer money go to “match” government employee “contributions” or outright pay in total for these public pension funds. It is a massive suck of taxpayer money, so much that it is hardly believable, and thus pensioners are certainly in denial of their disposition. In fact, the whole point of hiring so many redundant government employees is to specifically extract taxpayer money for each hireling by placing them into governments pension fund system. The more employees, the more exaction can be taken from taxpayer funds in all local, municipal governments. It’s just part of the global corporate investment scheme.

I explain this fully below and showed it in my documentary, The Great Pension Fund Hoax, so that no doubt can possibly remain, only cognitive dissonance. Remember, I only seek the Truth, no matter how much it hurts. And the pensioner will defend his or her “stake” in this evil cabal of the company store to the bitter end, an unwitting trainer to the rest of us. But Truth is never defeated by purposeful ignorance. Pension funds are, more than any other source, responsible for the globalism we see today. And Samuel Johnson’s definition above certainly holds true today.

Blog Link: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2013/04/21/public-pensions-welfare-for-the-middle-class/

We are a society that has no natural predators to fear, and so we have taken to devouring ourselves and our vital habitat to further our exponentially pointless gains in order to keep this investment and corporate governance scheme and class structure of inequality going into perpetual madness… and likely into oblivion.

Here’s a perfect example, the Sand Wars. And something everyone should see:

Blog Link: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2016/06/14/sand-wars-true-crimes-against-nature/

A look at the CAFR for any government pension fund reveals the corporate power structure that pensioners make allowance for in order to gain from that ultimate nothingness of stocks valuations and other financially void instruments of corruption. This post shows by industry just one pension fund’s investment portfolio in the industries that are otherwise continuously demonized by their bad behavior and toxic events.

Doesn’t it piss you off to know that your retirement and taxpayer money is being invested in George Bush’s Carlyle Group to the tune of multiple billions in just one government pension fund scheme?!?

Blog Link: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2012/07/10/cafr-school-how-corporations-are-funded-by-taxpayers/

Sadly, Walter Burien of CAFR1.com and I are estranged at this point, and to this fact I wish to speak here without intent of slander or attack. As I progressed in my own self-teaching, reading CAFR after CAFR after corporate AFR (annual financial report) mixed with legal code and the history of this investment system set up so long ago, my questions started becoming more of a nuisance to Walter than mere simple and actually answerable inquiries. As I contemplated more and more the reason and design behind his strategy and “Tax Retirement Fund” system, I could never find the part where his “plan” would actually fix anything or cause corporate governance of corporations to change for the benefit of us common folks as he continuously proclaimed. For once, Walter didn’t have any answers, and so my questions became mistakenly taken as personal attacks upon his “plan,” and his responses steeped more and more in resentment, as if I was attacking his intentions and not trying to help get that system going. And yet one theme of our conversations never did change, which was the self-enrichment of Walter after so much suffering as head of his own business plan. Eventually, I could not merely overlook this obvious conflict of interest, especially when Walter was no longer able to answer my questions about his designs.

I campaigned tirelessly for years on behalf of Walter, attempting to get people out there to fund his efforts, but never my own. I never asked for funding, convincing myself that it would somehow come if I kept doing the right thing; that someone would step up and back up my efforts.

Pipe dreams… or so I thought.

Suddenly and out of nowhere, Walter messaged me that he had just received a $600,000 donation (and a future pledge totaling $1 million) from exactly the kind of undeservingly wealthy trust fund baby that I figured would one day somehow wake up and consciously realize he needs to support someone like myself and Walter. But I had not campaigned anything for myself, only for Walter, trusting in his integrity. I had faith in the man, something the Bible says never to put upon any man. And now I understand those words of wisdom intimately, after so many years of broken faith in so many people.

In fact, both Walter and especially myself saw through one of those false heroes of the truth movement, Dr. Ron Paul (a signer of birth certificates). I remember when I first started calling bullshit on the whole “End The Fed” movement and the Federal Reserve mythology how I was chastised and fallaciously attacked from all sides. For to take away anyones perceived enemy causes them to start looking inwardly for the Real problems, and that would mean facing the actual, self-evident Truth. And so as soon as I understood that the CAFR of the Federal Reserve was indeed the supposedly non-existent audit of the Fed, I felt obligated in honor to share that information with my fellow “truthers.” It was this effort more than anything, including the depredation of Ron Pauls false character and hero-status, that showed me the truth about the truth movement.

After posting the first of these only primarily sourced expose’s on Ron Paul and the Federal Reserve, all I received was personal attacks. My favorite of these was on Ron Paul’s website, where the top members and managers of that (Daily Paul) site debated not on the facts presented in my blog article, but on whether or not I had enough clout and a big enough audience to cause any stink. Screw the facts, was I a threat? I couldn’t believe what I was seeing. They were only interested in keeping up appearances and holding on to the Ron Paul money-mobile and charade. And for a while it indeed was a commercial cash cow for Paul and his supporters, complete with books, T-shirts, and other worthless swag.

And big surprise! Nothing came of it.

But why did nothing come of it?

Because it was all based on foundational lies!!! And yet I was the enemy for telling the truth about the false truths about the actual Fed. I continued to find myself in this position over the years, constantly fact-checking and calling out the lies and liars that were pushing them, either willfully or unwittingly as followers putting their faith in men, but never in the actual, provable facts. Patriots for profit, we call them.

Here are my research articles explaining the true nature of Ron Paul and the Fed, and how fans and followers of these false teachers are stuck in their own paradigm.

Blog Link: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2012/06/23/the-incontrovertible-conundrum-of-dr-ron-paul/

Blog Link: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2012/09/01/todays-creatures-from-jekyll-island/

Blog Link: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2011/11/17/the-truth-about-the-audit-the-fed-bill/

Blog Link: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2014/10/27/stop-the-religion-of-the-fed/

Blog Link: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2016/05/10/vatican-the-new-global-authority-of-mammon/

While Ron Paul had the perfect opportunity to expose the CAFR system as the already existing and only audit of the Fed, he chose his career as a congressman instead. We challenged and challenged him to expose the CAFR to his “fans” but to no avail, proving him (and many of his supporters) to be utter fraudsters.

Blog Link: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2011/11/06/national-ask-ron-paul-about-the-cafr-month/

Blog Link: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2012/09/23/the-libertarian-idiocracy/

As far as mine and Walter Burien’s relationship is concerned, and without gory or personal detail, but as well knowing that money equals power and that power always and absolutely corrupts and leads to greed and why I try my hardest to avoid it like the plague, our story and history together ended abruptly. Walter decided that he would not use that money to fulfill all his plans that I had worked so hard to learn and promote, but to purchase land and build a large business complex upon it’s potential success in Pueblo, New Mexico. In other words, he was going to give that entire financial donation to himself in the form of equity, just like the corrupt government does in its own financial trickery. I can only assume that greed took over, as it so often does. And because I never asked for anything from Walter as payment for working on his documentary or for supporting him out of my own pocket, nothing is exactly what I got from him. I campaigned and begged without dignity for someone to support this guy, and than here was the end of it, the fruit of our efforts, and then the greedy squashing of that finally realized pipe dream. With nothing left to do business or travel with, nothing ever became of all that money to my knowledge, and it was certainly never used for the purposes I believed it would be utilized for.

Just another heartbreak in a series of heartbreaks…

That was the last I spoke to him. I stopped supporting him. I stopped asking the tough questions. And the last post I saw from him was of course Walter asking for more donations some time last year.

Again, I do not wish to belittle Walters efforts at educating or most of his works and for helping to guide my own learning curve, most of which was really from my own efforts and  research. I only want to show that like so many others that have crossed my path, money is always that which destroys them or steals their good intentions. Money is always what influences one, instead of helping, to harm others. Money is always what destroys relationships and induces divorce lawyers to cause women to become greedy monsters to the men they made vows to love and cherish. It always leads to evil, to adversarial purposes. It is why I ceased my show with “Freeman Burt” every week even as he continues to harm his clients by “helping” them, and as opposing proof is inversely why Daniel stayed with me to the end of my radio show in loyalty and brotherly love and intent every week. Money corrupts all things. Only Daniel and I seemed to remained free of it, which is a testimony all by itself.

To be clear, I am asking for donations the only morally viable way I know how to do so, without that corruptive element. Nothing displeases me more than being in this disposition, for I have learned to live without such legally purchased material pleasures made in foreign child-labor sweat shops and by U.S. prison labor hidden behind adorning celebrity faces pretending to give a shit about anything but their paycheck. I seek donations only to give it to another in exchange for printing my book. I am not selling anything, and never will, for commerce is that which is diametrically opposed to Love and Charity. I merely need the only object of exchange accepted by these brainwashed business people that have the equipment to print books in a private transaction, without barcodes and artful tracking marks, signs, and symbols. I haven’t any other choice that I am aware of. I will always give this work away for free to all who ask. And those who can will or will not support me here by donating what they can. What else can I possibly do? I don’t ask for your faith in me, only in my work and the verifiable and ancient knowledge presented within. All donations will go to that purpose alone.

As for my own journey, time progressed and I kept researching and learning…

As a cancer survivor at the age of 17, I spent a large part of my life seeking the causes of cancer and understanding why only in time do we have so many childhood illnesses that are considered as “early onset” adult diseases. What I found ultimately lead me to the only plausible prime suspect: vaccines. This was my first documentary on the history of vaccines, posted in September 2011, and which in hindsight is almost sophomoric compared to what I’ve learned since then. But that is the way of everyones unique path and the journey we choose to take. We must arrive in steps, and these are my larger steps in video, documentary form:

—=—

—=—

Early on in We Are Change we had been planning this documentary project, which I took over as the group started to become corrupt and tear apart, as so many of them do. Here is some early footage of vaccine victims we interviewed, which was not used.

—=—

I was also asked to speak to some folks in New York City about vaccines and the documentary, which was a nice visit to my former place of residence.

—=—

As time progressed,perhaps my greatest assembly of puzzle pieces was the Agenda 21 and Common Core plans and how they play out in globalism. Here is my lecture on the subject:

—=—

Somewhere along the way I documented my favorite charity, the only one I know that uses 100% of donations for charity! I have worked at this center every year for 4 years here in Utah when my mom and her church visits specifically to volunteer there. It is a charity worth supporting that does wonderful work.

—=—

My more recent public speaking engagement was in Philadelphia, where I was like a fish out of water, and it in fact caused me to expose most of the conference speakers as frauds. This didn’t go over very well, as Truth is not often what people want to hear. Imagine, freeing your mind at the Hilton! LOL!!

—=—

I have received gifts from people along the way, from books to home-made shoes, and these are of course the most precious of all to me. One unexpected gift was this one, where a reader placed my article into video format and dubbed his own voiceover to it. I regret that I made a mistake in this article, though it was one that does not actually have anything to do with the meat of its substance. I simply made an assumption that Sanger Institute was of the ilk of Margaret Sanger, and so I wrote her in mistakenly. But this should not take away from the actual information put forward, and I am so thankful for these types of efforts by good people. These types of mistakes teach us all how easily we can make false assumptions, and as researchers must verify all things.

This is “Archons And Mind Parasites And Extremophiles, Oh My!” and I know it took this guy a lot of time to put this together. So thank you so much for your efforts! What a voice!

—=—

—=—

Along the way, I even pretended to run for president, just to show that the common goyim people as subjects of the nation cannot be president of the nation, and to eventually expose the voting system as the fraud it is.

Though the website is history, the archive still exists. This is a very viable model that should be used. Though I don’t support Trump or his bloodline cousin Hillary, I will say that if Trump was smart he would follow this model and pick his entire staff before the election, so that people can see his “round table” of Cabinet heads and not just his silly hairdo. This is designed though as a “third party” platform. It is interesting to go back and read my individual platforms and compare them to what I know now. It is certainly healthy to view ones own ignorance recorded in the past to kill the ego of the present that will certainly reveal its own ignorance in the future…

Here is the archive for Clint 4 President, “the un-campaign:”

Link: http://web.archive.org/web/20130531000635/http://clint4p.com/

Finally, though the years of radio before this are not included, here are my radio archives from Republic Broadcasting and everything in between and after, which will continue to be updated with any new shows I do. An extra special thanks to my friend Drew for keeping these archives on my behalf. Again, some gifts just can’t be monetized.

5 days a week for two years I labored without pay to bring these shows to life while at the same time researching and writing my current book series. It was a hell of a ride, full of trolls and saints, with some really good interviews and a documented timeline of my own journey, much of which led to my books.

The over 500 radio show archives are here:

Website Link: https://corporationnationradioarchives.wordpress.com

I did so many shows before this, but they are not organized in any way, floating instead randomly out in the digital wasteland of youtube videos and mp3’s.

Perhaps each of these shows, most of them two hours, are worth a penny each? That’s $5 of thanks that could be gifted towards the printing of my book. But then a Mocha Frappacino with artificial flavoring from the local Starbuck’s drive-through might be worth that $5 so as to cause a chemical reaction in your brain, so that you might forget those hundreds of hours of research and rhetoric and walk around in a frap-induced stupor. I understand… We all have our priorities.

My work has been shared and plagiarized by many outlets, including the Prison Planet/Infowars sites and others. Some offer credit, and some do not. Some use a link only without actually naming my site or name. It’s an interesting matrix we have built.

Some of my movies, with my permission and blessing, are also available not-for-profit at the dollar DVD project (http://onedollardvdproject.com) to which I see no income from, but again with my blessing and support. These include Lethal Injection, The Corporation Nation, and The Great Pension Fund Hoax.

And so here I am, at the end of this winding path through so much disinformation and psychological warfare. And of course so much happened in between when the cameras weren’t rolling.

I am well into Volume II of my book series, and will be releasing it as soon as I can get it done and edited, adding it to the current free pdf available at StrawmanStory.info. The only question I have in nervous anticipation is will I be able to print it so as to make it permanent?

That’s up to you.

If you found any value in any of my above presented works, which represent literally my life for the last 10 years plus, then I am asking you without pride to make a donation today so that I may immortalize my journey’s end, by printing my books into a solid and preservable form immune from the controllers of this internet matrix. My path from here depends on you. Again, if you wish to have a copy of the book, I am asking a gift of $30 to cover printing and shipping, leaving me enough to hopefully print Volume II without such future groveling for funding. This will be my last effort in this regard, though I will keep writing and releasing for free my books that may or may not be printed.

Thank you for all who have donated so far, going way beyond, and for all your love and support. I have one last surprise I hope to pull off, a way to realize what I have been working towards. Should be a hoot if I can get it going. You’ll know when it happens, if it happens.

Until then, any radio shows I do will be posted at the archives. My other websites are:

Link: StrawmanStory.info

Link: TheCorporationNation.com

Link: CorporationNationRadioArchives.wordpress.com

To the followers of this blog, thank you for reading and subscribing and for all your comments and help over the years. My future books and perhaps a documentary or two are essentially replacing and will be linked to and announced on this blog, because quite frankly, at this point soundbites and clever stories and confrontations just can’t cut through such complete and evil designs. The parts never reveal the whole, especially when the parts are never presented as a whole. Debating the finer points of so many lies and fictions just doesn’t cut it for me anymore. I seek a higher path, a higher spiritual knowledge, and I hope we may meet someday on that path.

Until then… try to keep it Real, my friends. For the greatest and only True knowledge is the distinction and purposeful consciousness of what is self-evidently Real and what is fiction. And the strangest knowledge of all is that only artificial persons, places, and things need to be proven to fictionally exist, for these are not self-evident. Understand that, and no agent of that legal matrix of word magic can touch you.

Now, let’s see… what was all that stuff worth?

If the answer is nothing, then hey, it’s my fictional person’s “birth” day on August 8th, the day my vital statistics were civilly certified and registered! How about sending me a little something to support this happy artificial creation of a legal entity day, my joyous day of nativity as an emergence into this fictional realm of legal matrix day? Send a few words to wish me a happy bondservant day, congratulating me on my pretended, legalistic corporate birth as a “natural” legal person! Send a card to me as agent for service of process at my legally registered federal address, though I don’t think Hallmark (a government owned and traded corporation) makes a greeting card for being subject under Caesar’s district, not even a sympathy card.

Anyway, at least send me your greetings and salutations, and may your own artificial life be commercially fruitful in this open-air debtor’s prison on the upper levels hell.

My main, reliable email will be:

clint@strawmanstory.info

And by the way, just so you know, it is not that we are losing our democracy to tyranny, it is that democracy only ever leads to tyranny. Tyranny is the red-headed step-child of democracy. It is the fifth and final regime of every civilization as Plato predicated. Tyranny is voted in by the democratically poisoned society. Democracy is a warning that the end is near, and should not be celebrated as a good thing. Confused? It’s a chapter of my book, which I read live on the radio, here:

Link: https://corporationnationradioarchives.wordpress.com/2015/03/13/radio-show-number-330-march-12-2015/

Finally, I have found this last piece of wisdom to share. Seek the intent of the words of the Bible. I guarantee it is the end of all quests for Reality and Truth. To seek the Bible is not to seek religion, but instead the Natural Law. No good researcher can possibly avoid it, though they can certainly demonize it and pretend it doesn’t apply to them. But I assure you it is the cornerstone of everything. It offers the only way out of this legal hell, for it is the foundation of self-government, self-Law, not just empty religion. My books go over all this with a fine-tooth comb. The Bible teaches you only how to be your True Self again, and thus to treat all men only as their True Self, never respecting reputation, titles, names, marks, and signs. To look upon all only by its source, and all men as we were all born into Nature. The Bible, again, is not religion. Rather, it is a guide-stone on how to religiously follow the Law that is causes a sanctuary from all of man’s false legal inventions. Some people drink coffee religiously, and some watch television sitcoms religiously every week. The difference between a being a member of some corporate religion (artificial person) and actually acting religiously (verb) according to the Law of Nature (God) is the difference between darkness and light, between ignorance and knowledge, and between fiction and reality.

What law are we under? The law of mammon. For the legal law always tells us the opposite of the Bible. The Bible says to respect only men, never their persons, while the legal law respects only persons, not men. A person in law may only deal with other persons, while a man of God (of Nature) may only deal with God’s Creatures. Think about this next time your government is trying to push transgender bathrooms and gender neutral status on your person. For person is the same word as status. In the fiction of legality, we are forced to respect the status of the man’s person, which has no place or existence in Nature. There are no words, no names in Reality, and the Laws of Nature will never actually be altered, except in make-believe and under false name and title (persona).

I have found every reasonable question I may ask to be answered in scripture. It is not what you have been told.

My favorite site as a searchable, Biblical database where I can see the original words and translations is: https://www.blueletterbible.org

There are so many other posts on this blog I can hardly leave them out. But here we must come to an end.

All my love.

Good luck, and good day.

Make a Donation Button

–Clint Richardson (Realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Friday, August 5th, 2016

 

Republican National Party Is Member Of International Democrat Union (IDU)


In these modern, strong delusional times, it is often hard to see the forest through the trees and to distinguish the lies from reality. Even the principles of law conclude that a lie may be confirmed and ratified as a legal “truth,” that black may be declared as white, left right, and up down. In short, we live in a democracy.

Plato wrote in his 5 regimes that this state of democracy is only the lowest form of humanity before the final step of total tyranny, from which a reset happens as the pure aristocracy reestablishes itself as the cure for democracy and tyranny, the repeating cycle of all the ages. Like the phoenix rising from its own spent ashes, these planned revolutions apparently reestablish the old order as the new order, the bloodlines of the ages appearing in new form and title. Same as the old boss…

But there is something new on the horizon. For we are witnessing global government for the first time in history. It’s not so much that this notion of globalist rule wasn’t already established long ago with such beauties as Unum Sanctum and other bull-shit from the powers of combined church and state that be, it’s that for the first time in history technology has caught up with greed and desire. The combined legacies of so many “leaders” have added up to one big modern orgy of infrastructure and control.

Democracy is politically spouted from all the virtual rooftops of the mass media, that exceedingly transparent controlled opposition of the old and new boss, as the CIA’s large-breasted bluebirds report and sing homage and fealty to that great system of political corruption. It is touted from the halls of legislature and parroted by the multitude of the unaware. And as it turns out, both main political parties are on board the same purposefully sinking ship, desperately and meticulously building a new Atlantis around their own dying model.

But do not be fooled, for this word Atlantis merely means fantasy, its synonyms being delusion, illusion, nightmare, apparition, chimera, mirage, a fool’s paradise, hallucination, fabrication, and of course the impossibility of a man-made utopia.

That only leaves a few things in opposition to such a false creation, and the antonyms to this word Atlantis are indeed simply truth, reality, certainty, actuality, and fact.

Now, the author realizes that the masses of goyim out there as the citizenships of the nations united in such an invention would rather support and live falsely in such a lie as this, a virtual matrix of pure delusion. I have no doubt that this will be the future of the majority. And so I am not here to try and prevent its dissemination as much as I am to document the tools of its creation. For we who will not take the marks and use the biometric identification and suffer the inoculations designed to rid us of our spirituality must be ever vigilant of such evils, such darkness posing as the light.

And so today we shall focus on what this author considers to be one of the most ridiculous customs and rituals that the common people participate in without having the slightest clue as to the origins and intent thereof. That is, of course, the private associations called as the political party system and its control over the electoral process.

But before we expose the communitarian, socialist agendas of both parties as that celebrated “democracy” in action, perhaps we should get a better grasp on the historical point of view of this word. So who likes and who opposes democracy?

–=–

DEMOCRATIC:

“Of or pertaining to democracy, or to a political party called “democratic,” particularly, in the United States, the Democratic party, which succeeded the Anti-federalist, or Republican, party.”

—Black’s Law 4th Edition

–=–

Dictatorship naturally arises out of democracy, and the most aggravated form of tyranny and slavery out of the most extreme liberty.”

—Plato

–=–

A pure democracy is generally a very bad government. It is often the most tyrannical government on earth; for a multitude is often rash, and will not hear reason.”

Noah Webster

–=–

“Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.”

—John Adams

–=–

“Democracy is indispensable to socialism.”

—Vladimir Ilyich Lenin

—=—

“Democracy is the road to socialism.”

Karl Marx

–=–

“To my mind, there is a solution which has to do with democracy, because democratic governments are subject to the will of the people. So, if the people will it, you can actually create international institutions through the democratic states.”

George Soros

–=–

“Democracy is only a dream: it should be put in the same category as Arcadia, Santa Claus, and Heaven.”

–H. L. Mencken

–=–

“The oppressed are allowed once every few years to decide which particular representatives of the oppressing class are to represent and repress them in parliament.”

—Vladimir Ilyich Lenin

—=—

“The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter.”

Winston Churchill

–=–

Our alliances should be understood as a means to expand our influence, not as a constraint on our power. The expansion of democracy and freedom in the world should be a shared interest and value with all nations.”

—Chuck Hagel, 24th United States Secretary of Defense under Obama, Chairperson of the President’s Intelligence Advisory Board

–=–

“Our country’s founders cherished liberty, not democracy.”

—Ron Paul

–=–

“I’ve always had a Marxist understanding of history: democracy is a result of a broad modernization process that happens in every country. Neocons think the use of political power can force the pace of change, but ultimately it depends on societies doing it themselves.”

—Francis Fukuyama

–=–

“Sometimes democracy must be bathed in blood.”

—Augusto Pinochet, president of Chile

–=–

“Democracy consists of choosing your dictators, after they’ve told you what you think it is you want to hear.”

—Alan Coren

–=–

“Democracy means government by discussion, but it is only effective if you can stop people talking.”

—Clement Attlee

–=–

“The flood of money that gushes into politics today is a pollution of democracy.”

—Theodore White

–=–

The President will lead in the treason. Your militia will leave you and fight against you… When evil men take office the whole gang will be in collusionThey will keep the people in utter ignorance and steal their liberty by ambuscade. When Government removes your armaments, you will have no power, but government will have all power.” 

—Patrick Henry

–=–

“The ignorance of one voter in a democracy impairs the security of all.”

—John F. Kennedy

–=–

“Democracy needs support, and the best support for democracy comes from other democracies.”

—Benazir Bhutto

–=–

Perhaps the greatest flaw in this concept of government in general, be it of kings or representatives, is the mistaken identity of its members. To assume the incorruptible nature of any man is the folly of all others. And in this lowest form of government called democracy, such an assumption would only lead to exactly what we see in government today. For behind the banner of democracy lies always the worst possible cheats, pirates, and thieves. And under that subjective banner lies only illiteracy and ignorance, the masses of they who actually vote for their tyrants while choosing to believe they are saviors.

To turn the entire world into individual democracies is the number one goal of the modern tyrant. For only in the ignorance of the masses may democracy may take hold, thrive, and destroy itself. From this subversion the tyrant thrives, the old system dies, and the new order begins. This rebirth process is well under way in most nations. And of course war will transpire in those whose people choose knowledge over the necessary ignorance of democratic public-mindedness, for war is merely the clearing of obstacles in a globally sanctioned international commerce of nations, utterly controlled by one united front ratified by those same tyrants promoting democracy now and central, globalist rule later.

–=–

“Democracy still has a real hope and chance in Iraq, and true freedom in this country would be the greatest testament to those who gave their lives for it.”

—Mary Landrieu

–=–

Nothing is more ridiculous than this political notion of killing millions and causing mass starvation, suffering, and destruction of infrastructure with only the somehow innocent and patriotically perceived design to spread freedom and democracy. This attitude that many millions or billions must die so that democracy can live is ludicrous at worse, paradoxical at best. But then, what else would one expect from these creators of a New Atlantis?

What really is this militarized, psychological warfare effort to spread democracy to the world? Why the need to cause democratic elections?

The answer is simple really… volunteerism, or at least the appearance of a voluntary society. You see, this term “volunteerism” goes by a different name in law, that being the doctrine of master and servant. When a commonality of people are all given “equality” to vote for their tyrants, the title of those tyrants is officially merely professed as legitimately elected “politicians.” Thus the voting process is the creator of mutualistic consent as mob rule. The minority assumes the majority will; the majority always being the most weak and susceptible to illusion and predictive programming. This is called as democracy, where a bunch of fools (a legal term meaning those not in right mind or in Latin non compos mentis) believe they each have a voice, when in reality their votes are counted as only one voice from one body. And those who choose not to decide between their tyrants in that democratic system of voting still have made a choice, that choice being assent to the majority will. It’s a no win situation, regardless of how we individually vote. For it is not the results of the vote that matter, only the volunteerism that causes legitimacy of the whole illusionary process. The act, not the result, is what makes tyrants become as legitimate in the minds of the masses.

Obviously both political parties and all third parties must include themselves in this democratic process. And so we can state with self-evident absoluteness that all parties must support democracy. The Lenin and Marx quotes above certainly help us to understand the origins and necessity of democracy as the gateway to all other systems, be they socialism, communism, or that great combination of all isms called and promoted as communitarianism. The reader would be shocked to learn that most “politicians” out there are grand supporters of this modern plan of communitarianism. And I invite the reader to research this on his or her own. A good source is here:

LINK–> http://web.archive.org/web/20080621055453/http://nord.twu.net/acl/evolution.html

Note: Please support Niki Raapana in her works. (http://nikiraapana.blogspot.com)

Now let us examine this collusion of the Republican National Party of the United States with the International Democrat Union (IDU), supporting so many other socialist and communitarian constructs around the world.

–=–

IDU Mission:

“Being committed to advancing the social and
political values on which democratic societies are founded,
including the basic personal freedoms and human rights,
as defined in the (UN) Universal Declaration of Human Rights….”

–IDU founding Declaration of Principles, second Paragraph

–=–

Yep. You read the title of this blog-post correctly. As it turns out, the political party game is one giant United Nations, Agenda 21 fraud.

Yes, the Republican Party of the United States is actually a member of the International Democrat Union (IDU), which above all else promotes the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights over the supposed sovereignty of the United States constitution – and over that of any other member party’s (nation’s) constitutional charter as well! This is essential for global governance.

In an article written by Tom Deweese (American Policy Center) and posted on the Gunowners of America website, the IDU is succinctly unveiled:

“The root of the IDU’s political agenda is Fabian Socialism which wants to blur national borders and cultures, eliminate private property and individual liberty in favor of the common good. The Fabians consider themselves to be a ruling elite that knows better than individuals how to run our lives. Their way is: Heads, government wins. Tails, citizens lose. It is the worst form of tyranny. And this is the root of the IDU, and by association, apparently the Republican Party. That answers a lot of questions about recent Republican policy decisions…”

Link–> http://gunowners.org/op0542.htm

–=–

As it is so very easy to confuse the intentions of these international bodies with that of individual peoples of sovereign states, we must make this very important distinction between the United Nations and the individual but no longer seperate Nations that subscribe to it.

From the American Policy Institute in 2009, again by Mr. Tom Deweese, we read:

New GOP Chairman should remove Party from the International Democrat Union…

“As an example of how this second system works in practice, The Constitution of the old Soviet Union said that Soviet citizens had most of the same rights as Americans. Except that it also said individual rights were secondary to the common good. In the case of the Soviet Union, the common good was defined as creating a worldwide communist utopia where individual wants and needs simply didn’t count. We all know how that worked out for the Soviet citizens.

While veiled in language designed to sound much like the Declaration of Independence, the UN’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights actually takes this second approach, outlining specific rights it says we should all have. It says nothing of “unalienable” rights, instead referring to “rights under the law.” Who or what is the law, according to the Human Rights Declaration? It says, “the will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government.” Now, at first look, that sounds like America. Democracy. People voting – the opposite of dictatorship. But such a concept ignores the very root of American freedom – that our rights are guaranteed, no matter what the majority thinks or wants. Moreover, Article 29, Section 3 of the Declaration says “These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.” So much for “unalienable” rights.”

LINK–> http://americanpolicy.org/2009/01/08/new-gop-chairman-should-remove-party-from-the-international-democrat-union-3/

–=–

Of course those unalienable rights spoken of in the declaration of independence had nothing to do with public 14th amendment citizens of the United States, but only actually protected those private men who reserved all rights from the United States. The American Policy Institute will never tell the common citizenship this of course (or simply does not know). Often the parrots of policy know nothing of the words they speak, led by the beak to support and make falsely patriotic what should be abandoned and utterly destroyed, such as the existence and purpose of these controlling and corrupting political parties.

We must learn to recognize the difference between blood and fiction, between man untainted by political, public status and he who avoids such marks, names, and numbers in privacy. Citizenship is, of course, an alienation upon privacy. Thus the United Nations and its declarations only apply to the public citizenships of each nation, which are only the common, registered goyim (general people) and the commercial laws pertaining to us. The private men of each private (several) State will not be subject to such national rule, for they are the creators of nations. Gods. A “State” is nothing more than a Private bloodline of “People.” And it is these tyrants that create the democratic nations and the law of nations for their own protection against that mass of illiterates we call nationally as the public. In short, the United Nations is the uniting in commerce and law of all slave colonies called as nations. Colony means only farm or plantation. And global governance will only apply to those born in the nations; those birthed and certified in attainder or legal “corruption of blood” under a commercial, legal system of alienation.

It is certainly true that those who falsely believe they are free are the most hopelessly enslaved. And democracy is certainly the best tool for the propagation of such a false dialectic.

In the history section of the about tab from the IDU.org website we read:

“The International Democrat Union (IDU) is a working association of over 80 Conservative, Christian Democrat and like-minded political parties of the centre and centre right.

Formed in 1983, the IDU provides a forum in which Parties holding similar beliefs can come together and exchange views on matters of policy and organisational interest, so that they can learn from each other, act together, establish contacts and speak with one strong voice to promote democracy and centre-right policies around the globe. FOUNDER MEMBERS of the IDU included Britain’s Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, then US Vice-President George Bush Sr, Paris Mayor and later President of France Jacques Chirac, German Chancellor Helmut Kohl and many other Party Leaders.

Our Mission

I. The International Democrat Union (IDU) shall consist of Member Parties of the Asia Pacific Democrat Union (APDU); the Caribbean Democrat Union (CDU); the Democrat Union of Africa; the European Democrat Union (EDU); the European People’s Party (EPP); the Alliance of European Conservatives and Reformists (AECR); and the Union of Latin American Parties (UPLA), which have adhered to the IDU Declaration of Principles.

II. The IDU will foster the common philosophy of its Member Parties, establish permanent relations at a bilateral and multilateral level, encourage mutual support and to these ends will provide a forum for the exchange of views and information on matters of interest to all or a considerable number of its Member Parties.

Countries can only develop their full potential if they develop recognising the ideals of liberal democracy, freedom of the individual, and the need for economic growth to be based on individual initiative and free, competitive enterprise economies. The IDU has a clear role in a modern world, where today’s idea in one country is tomorrow’s policy in another.

Through the IDU, member Parties can exchange policy ideas, assist each other to win the political argument, and to win elections. There are regular meetings of both the full IDU and its Regional Unions and Organisations. The officers of the IDU are elected at Party Leaders’ Meetings which are held every three or four years.

At IDU Executive Meetings, briefings are given on local and topical issues, as well as consideration given to applicant parties. Apart from Executive Meetings and meetings of IDU’s Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, the IDU holds events such as the Young Leaders Forum, plus undertakes fact-finding missions and election observation. A major event is also held every four years to coincide with the Republican Convention, the last one held in September 2012 in Tampa (Florida).

The IDU also organises campaigning seminars for politicians and party workers. These involve exchanges of information on campaign technology, fund-raising techniques, opinion polling, advertising and campaign organisation. The IDU plays an essential role in enabling like-minded, centre-right parties to share experiences in order to achieve electoral success.”

Under the history tab we read:

“19 dignitaries attended the meeting that established the IDU held at the Hotel Intercontinental n London on 24th June 1983: Dr Alois Mock (Osterreichische Volkspartei, Austria); Prime-Minister Margaret Thatcher (Conservative Party, Great Britain); Federal Chancellor Helmut Kohl (CDU, Federal Republic of Germany); Prime-Minister Franz-Josef Strauss (CSU, Federal Republic of Germany); M Jacques Chirac (Rassemblement Pour la Republique, France); Mr Andrew Peacock (Liberal Party, Australia); M Evangelos Averoff-Tossizza (Nea Demokratia, Greece); Sr Fraga Iribarne (Alianza Popular, Spain); Sr Oscar Alzaga, (Partido Democrata Popular, Spain); Mrs Susanne Wood, National Party, New Zealand); President Glafcos Clerides (Democratic Rally, Cyprus); Mr Ilkka Suominen (Kansallinen Kokoomus, Finland); Sr Lucas Pires (CDS, Portugal); Mr Tatsuo Tanaka (Liberal Democrat Party, Japan); Mr Ulf Adelsohn (Moderata Samlingspartiet, Sweden); Mr Erik Nielsen (Progressive Conservative Party, Canada); Prime-Minister Poul Schluter (Det Konservative Folkeparti, Denmark); Mr Jo Benkow (Hoyre, Norway); and Mr Frank Fahrenkopf (Republican National Committee, USA).

In addition the US Vice-President George Bush and Norwegian Prime-Minister Kare Willoch (IDU’s second Chairman, from 1987 to 1989) were present and both spoke at the founding meetingClick here for the minutes of the founding meeting and Declaration of Principles in PDF format.

The IDU officers elected were: Chairman: Dr Alois Mock (Osterreichische Volkspartei, Austria); Vice-Chairmen: Ulf Adelsohn (Moderata Samlingspartiet, Sweden); Richard Allen (Republican National Committee, USA); Jacques Chirac (Rassemblement Pour la Republique, France); Cecil Parkinson (Conservative Party, Great Britain); Sir John Atwill (Liberal Party, Australia); and Prime-Minister Franz-Josef Strauss (CSU, Federal Republic of Germany), in addition to Treasurer: Allan Lawrence (Progressive Conservative Party, Canada) and Executive Secretary: Scott Hamilton (Conservative Party, Great Britain).

–=–

That’s right folks, the self-labeled “Conservative” Republican Party of the United States has partnered with such other national political parties as the Liberal Democrat Party of Japan, the Liberal Party of Australia, the Democratic Rally of Cyprus, and who could forget those supposed tyrannical redcoats of the Conservative Party of Great Britain?

THE CHAIRMAN:

Thank you very much Mr Vice-President, and I am particularly grateful to you coming to London and conferring additional reputation to our meeting by your presence. May I now ask Mr Fahrenkopf to take the floor.”

MR FRANK FAHRENKDPF:

“>Chairman, Republican National CommitteeU.S.A .]

“Mr Chairman, my colleagues, it is with a great deal of pride and pleasure that I as Chairman of the Republican Party of the United States join Vice-President Bush in commemorating the historic creation of IDU here in London today.

A year and a half ago I attended an EDU meeting in Munichat which the seed of the Pacific Democrat Union and the International Democrat Union was sown. Last July, in Tokyo, the PDU was formed; and last week, in Honolulu, I had the great pleasure to host the PDU’s first annual council meeting. Today, we reap the remaining harvest of that Munich meeting with the birth of the IDUOn behalf of the Republican Partylet me assure my colleagues of our full cooperation and participation in the IDU – and in seeking our mutual goals of promoting democracy, freedom, self-determination and, most important, peace in the world.”

THE CHAIRMAN:

Thank you Mr Fahrenkopf.

May I now ask the Norwegian Prime-Minister to take the floor.”

—Minutes of the IDU founding meeting and Declaration of Principles

–=–

Even as the Pope calls for the same system of worldwide “peace and safety” through United Nations programs and one world religion, we are warned repeatedly that these artful terms are merely the lies of tyrants.

–=–

For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape… 

1 Thessalonians 5:3 KJB

–=–

And in the latter time of their kingdom, when the transgressors are come to the full, a king of fierce countenance, and understanding dark sentences, shall stand up. And his power shall be mighty, but not by his own power: and he shall destroy wonderfully, and shall prosper, and practise, and shall destroy the mighty and the holy people. And through his policy also he shall cause craft to prosper in his hand; and he shall magnify himself in his heart, and by peace shall destroy many: he shall also stand up against the Prince of princes; but he shall be broken without hand.”

—Daniel 8: 23-25, KJB

–=–

“Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.”

—Mathew 7: 15, KJB

—=—

“Now, it is true that the nature of society is to create, among its citizens, an illusion of safety; but it is also absolutely true that the safety is always necessarily an illusion. Artists are here to disturb the peace.”

—James Baldwin, ‘An interview with James Baldwin’ (1961)

—=—

“As distrust, in some sense, is the mother of safety, so security is the gate of danger. A man had need to fear this most of all, that he fears not at all.”

—Thomas Brooks, citation in Josiah Hotchkiss Gilbert’s, ‘Dictionary of Burning Words of Brilliant Writers,’ p. 532 (1895).

—=—

20 bucks says the reader has no idea what the word “danger” means in its etymology.

–=–

DANGERnoun – mid-13c., “power of a lord or master, jurisdiction,” from Anglo-French daunger, Old French dangier “power, power to harm, mastery, authority, control” (12c., Modern French danger), alteration (due to assoc. with damnum) of dongier, from Vulgar Latin *dominarium “power of a lord,” from Latin dominuslord, master” (see domain). Modern sense of “risk, peril” (from being in the control of someone or something else) evolved first in French and was in English late 14c. Replaced Old English pleoh; in early Middle English this sense is found in peril.

LINK–>http://etymonline.com/index.php?allowed_in_frame=0&search=danger

–=–

The United States, the nation, is the creation of a danger, also called as a district. And citizen-ships are of course on a commercial voyage in peril, requiring licensure and insurance on their surname. This scratch of the surface will be expounded upon intricately in my upcoming book, a private work currently in editing and due out very soon, free to all who seek such forbidden knowledge.

It is strange that no one seems to question the fact that Abraham Lincoln, as he who caused what can only be compared to the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia that killed so many millions, was the first Republican party president. And suddenly, a civil war? Suddenly, the first tyrannical executive order against brother and sister, mother and father. Suddenly, lawlessness according to the law of necessity in war. Suddenly, reconstruction of the constitution and government, including the 14th amendment that enslaved all commoners under a slave-state based on equality, but never equity?

No one seems to question that the later and 2nd president Roosevelt, whom days after his election caused congress to declare his and all future president’s virtual dictatorship through permanent national emergency status, was of this Democratic platform, though his previous presidential namesake was certainly of that “Grand Old Party.”  For those unfamiliar with these histories of the American presidency and the dictatorship spoken of, please see my articles entitled “Cracking The Cult Of The Constitution,” parts 1 & 2, or Volume II of my upcoming book series.

“Two distantly related branches of the family from Oyster Bay on Long Island and Hyde Park in Dutchess CountyUpstate New York achieved national political prominence with the elections of (republican) Presidents Theodore Roosevelt (1901–1909) and his fifth cousin (democratFranklin Delano Roosevelt (1933–1945), whose wife, First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt, was Theodore’s niece.”

–Wikipedia entry for Roosevelt family

–=–

But where exactly does this leave us as compared to the already so-named competition?What about the other United States “Democratic” Party?

–=–

“Note that the Political Party today known as the “Democratic Party” was
initially established as theRepublican Party.” The Jeffersonian party
members were labeled “Democratic” by opposition Federalists –
an attempt to stigmatize them as purveyors of democracy or mob rule.
By the Jacksonian era, the term “The Democracy” was in use by the party;
the name “Democratic Party” was eventually settled upon and
became the official name in 1844.”

–Thomas Jefferson, by Joyce Appleby, Encyclopedia Britannica

–=–

One would be hard-pressed to describe the National Democratic Party of America as anything but a promoter of it’s own brand of the similitude of neoliberal, communitarian socialism promoted by its mainstream counterpart. And certainly the antics of this current president need to be discussed as to their source.

For instance, the Chicago Democratic Socialists of America stated in true communitarian spirit the following in its report entitled “New Ground 45” in 1996:

March – April, 1996

A Town Meeting on Economic Insecurity: Employment and Survival in Urban America

By Bob Roman

Over three hundred people attended the first of two Town Meetings on Economic Insecurity on February 25 in Ida Noyes Hall at the University of Chicago. Entitled “Employment and Survival in Urban America,” the meeting was sponsored by the UofC DSA Youth Section, Chicago DSA and University Democrats. The panelists were Toni Preckwinkle, Alderman of Chicago’s 4th Ward; Barack Obama, candidate for the 13th Illinois Senate District; Professor William Julius Wilson, Center for the Study of Urban Inequality at the University of Chicago; Professor Michael Dawson, University of Chicago; and Professor Joseph Schwartz, Temple University and a member of DSA’s National Political Committee…

One of the themes that has emerged in Barack Obama’s campaign iswhat does it take to create productive communities,” not just consumptive communities. It is an issue that joins some of the best instincts of the conservatives with the better instincts of the left. He felt the state government has three constructive roles to play.

The first ishuman capital development.” By this he meant public education (think Common Core), welfare reform (Think Obama-Care), and a “workforce preparation strategy” (more Common Core). Public education requires equality in funding. It’s not that money is the only solution to public education’s problems but it’s a start toward a solution. The current proposals for welfare reform are intended to eliminate welfare but it’s also true that the status quo is not tenable. A true welfare system would provide for medical care, child care and job training (i.e. Common Core and Obama-care). While Barack Obama did not use this term, it sounded very much like the “social wage” approach used by many social democratic labor parties. By “workforce preparation strategy,” Barack Obama simply meant a coordinated, purposeful program of job training instead of the ad hoc, fragmented approach used by the State of Illinois today.

The state government can also play a role in (wealth) redistribution, the allocation of wages and jobs. As Barack Obama noted, when someone gets paid $10 million to eliminate 4,000 jobs, the voters in his district know this is an issue of power not economics. The government can use as tools labor law reform, public works and contracts

Link–> http://www.chicagodsa.org/ngarchive/ng45.html

–=–

Not only was Barack Obama an honored attendee and speaker for the socialist party of Chicago, in September 1995 he was a contracted publicist for the Marxist “New Party”.

“About 50 activists attended the Chicago New Party membership meeting in July. The purpose of the meeting was to update members on local activities and to hear appeals for NP support from four potential political candidates. The NP is being very active in organization building and politics. There are 300 members in Chicago. In order to build an organizational and financial base the NP is sponsoring house parties. Locally it has been successful both fiscally and in building a grassroots base. Nationwide it has resulted in 1000 people committed to monthly contributions. The NP’s political strategy is to support progressive candidates in elections only if they have a concrete chance to “win”. This has resulted in a winning ratio of 77 of 110 elections. Candidates must be approved via a NP political committee. Once approved, CANDIDATES MUST SIGN A CONTRACT WITH THE NP. The contract mandates that THEY MUST HAVE A VISIBLE AND ACTIVE RELATIONSHIP WITH THE NP.

The political entourage included Alderman Michael Chandler, William Delgado, chief of staff for State Rep Miguel del Valle, and spokespersons for State Sen. Alice Palmer, Sonya Sanchez, chief of staff for State Sen. Jesse Garcia, who is running for State Rep in Garcia’s District; and Barack Obama…”

Link–> http://www.chicagodsa.org/ngarchive/ng42.ht

–=–

Perhaps the most amazing cognitive disassociation and dissonance of the American people is the fact that “democracy” and the spread of it actually means that the people do not elect their own president/head of state.

The member nations/states of the International Democrat Union, including the United States, are almost exclusively nations/states where the president/head of state is elected through parliament or electoral college. In other words, in most of these “democratic” nations/states, the head of state is an INDIRECT ELECTION, NOT BY THE COMMON, VOTING PEOPLE.

For instance, the following nations have indirect elections for president, either as a monarchy, by election of legislature or by electoral college, orby some other committee or parliament, as opposed to that supposedly communist China, where the common people actually directly vote for their president:

Albania
Australia
Belgium –
Canada
Peoples Republic of China –
Denmark
Estonia
Ethiopia –
Germany
Greece
Hong Kong –
Hungary
India –
Iraq –
Israel –
Italy –
Jamaica –
Japan –
Kosovo –
Kuwait –
Lous –
Lebenon –
Libya –
Luxemburg –
Morocco –
Nepal –
Netherlands –
New Zealand
Norway
Pakistan –
Saudi Arabia –
South Africa –
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland –
Syria –
Thailand –
United Arab Emirates –
United Kingdom
United States
Vatican City –

Complete list here –> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elections_by_country

–=–

In contrast, when we view the nations or states that do have direct elections, with few exceptions they are generally considered as “third world” counties. It is not that they are, just that the self-proclaimed first-worlders call them as such. Ireland and Iran for instance hold direct elections, two very isolationist countries that do not cooperate with the monarchical or electoral systems and wish to preserve their culture and religious heritage. The same cannot be said of America, a people that seem to have no idea that their vote is purely a political pole, a popularity contest, and not the actual vote for a president. We do not vote for the best man, only for the best fictional party member, 1984 style.

I have presented here many threads to follow for the reader. At the time of this posting the IDU.org website is conveniently and temporarily not in service. And so I hope this collection of information will be a foundation for your own future research and sharing with others so brainwashed by this illegitimate system.

Will it stop you from voting? Who cares? The result is always the same with or without your individual vote, and not enough common goyim will see this to matter. I speak now only to the remnant, to those desiring to be unenfranchised from their false, political freedom.

DOM – Used as a termination, denotes jurisdiction, or property and jurisdiction; primarily, doom, judgment; as in kingdom, earldom. Hence it is used to denote state, condition or quality, as in wisdom, freedom. (Webster’s 1828)

FREEnoun –  [Hebrew. See Frank.] 1. Being at liberty; not being under necessity or restraint, physical or moral; a word of general application to the body, the will or mind, and to corporations. 2. In government, not enslaved; not in a state of vassalage or dependence; subject only to fixed laws, made by consent, and to a regular administration of such laws; not subject to the arbitrary will of a sovereign or lord; as a free state, nation or people. 3. Instituted by a free people, or by consent or choice of those who are to be subjects, and securing private rights and privileges by fixed laws and principles; not arbitrary or despotic; as a free constitution or government. There can be no free government without a democratical branch in the constitution. 4. Not imprisoned, confined or under arrest; as, the prisoner is set free. 5. Unconstrained; unrestrained; not under compulsion or control. A man is free to pursue his own choice; he enjoys free will. 6. Permitted; allowed; open; not appropriated; as, places of honor and confidence are free to all; we seldom hear of a commerce perfectly free. (Webs1828)

FREEDOMnoun – 1. A state of exemption from the power or control of another; liberty; exemption from slavery, servitude or confinement. Freedom is personal, civil, political, and religious. [See Liberty.] 2. Particular privileges; franchise; immunity; as the freedom of a city. 3. Power of enjoying franchises. 4. Exemption from fate, necessity, or any constraint in consequence of predetermination or otherwise; as the freedom of the will. 5. Any exemption from constraint or control. 6. Ease or facility of doing any thing. He speaks or acts with freedom. 7. Frankness; boldness. He addressed his audience with freedom. 8. License; improper familiarity; violation of the rules of decorum; with a plural. Beware of what are called innocent freedoms. (Webster’s 1828)

FREEDOMLiberty; the right to do what is not forbidden by law. Freedom does not preclude the idea of subjection to law; indeed, it presupposes the existence of some legislative provision, the observance of which insures freedom to us, by securing the like observance from others. (Bouvier’s 1856)

ENFRANCHISETo make free; to incorporate a man in a society or body politic.(Black’s 4th)

ENFRANCHISEMENTThe act of making free; giving a franchise or freedom to; investiture with privileges or capacities of freedom, or municipal or political liberty. Admission to the freedom of a city; admission to political rights, and particularly the right of suffrage. Anciently, the acquisition of freedom by a villein from his lord. The word is now used principally either of the manumission of slaves, of giving to a borough or other constituency a right to return a member or members to parliament, or of the conversion of copyhold into freehold. (Black’s 4th)

ENFRANCHISEMENT nounRelease from slavery or custody. 1. The admission of persons to the freedom of a corporation or state; investiture with the privileges of free citizens; the incorporating of a person into any society or body politic. (Webs1828)

–=–

“In a popular sense, the political rights of subjects and citizens are franchises, such as the right of suffrage.”

–Black’s Law 2nd Edition, definition of franchise

–=–

This idea of liberty and freedom is taken so completely out of context to the average “citizenship” in public-mindedness that the notion that we live in a voluntary society where servants choose their masters as the doctrines of law is completely lost. We do not realize that it is our own unrestrained freedoms (liberties) as franchises of the state that actually cause us to be slaves to it. For a citizen-ship is like a rental care, a legal status that is bound to all legal laws of persons. And so the freedom (franchise) enjoyed, including the right to suffer from our own choices, also called suffrage or voting, is the very nature of the slavery system called politically (artificially) as liberty. Yet again, we are taking what is false, what is created only in the Atlantean jurisdiction, and pretending it to be a reality.

And so if one and only one thing is learned by the reader of this article it must be this: that the powers that be exist and subsist only because we suffer (vote) for them to do just that. In other words, we can only blame ourselves for voting for the better of two evils. No one is forcing our hand. No one is forcing our participation in the franchise of citizenship. We put ourselves into the path and ad-venture of the danger of another. We consent through our actions and inaction, and by doing so allow the worst of the worst element of the human equation to cheat, steal, and pirate everything we need even while it allows us the franchise to use what we want. After all, we voted for everything we complain about and deserve everything we are handed. Until we admit defeat, we cannot and will not find natural freedom, only the false appearance of nature as a political art from called franchise.

In the end, which is by the way right now, we need not fear the threat of globalism for it is already here. To fear deceit when it is already upon us is foolishness. Fear of it is truly irrelevant at this stage of a very ancient game of pledging. The only consideration we must individually make is wether to participate in it or not, whether to voluntarily carry its enfranchised mark, surname, and number or not, and ultimately whether we are willing to be persecuted, imprisoned, and killed for daring to have, and more importantly act upon, the Highest knowledge of self-evident Truth.

Remember, you are voting for a party, not a man. The party has no power without the person you vote (or don’t vote) for and thus give legitimacy to. Whether we give willingly our choice or refrain and offer no choice at all, either action is an expression of consent. Not tacit, expressive.

We must choose our Master. Reality or Atlantis. It’s that simple.

Until then, enjoy the big legal lie…

.

–Clint Richardson (Realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Thursday, April 28th, 2016

New Election, Same Old Blood


 

For my listeners and past readers, even the trolls among you, this info should certainly come as no surprise or as anything new. For we have shown that only the private bloodline, that preambled Posterity of those founding representatives of “white persons” can become president, and of course “they” are all related by their “legitimate” lineage written by hands in their own fabled genealogies. There is never a choice in these elections except between two cousins, not that the common public actually elects anybody by merely participating in the limited voting franchise. Voting is not electing. But that doesn’t stop anyone now does it? Voting here is only consent to standing under the State sovereignty as a principality, its majority political party, its representative(s) by agency, and nothing else. Only a fool would vote knowing his vote, no matter what, will only favor that which is opposed to him, that which enslaves him through word-magic and contracted dis-ease. Ah, the causality of illusionary choice. And every four years the charade is played out again. Billions spent. And only the bloodline ever wins. The game is fixed. The con is rigged. Suckers.

But for the continued benefit of tracking our great multitude standing in its collective idiocracy, let’s take a look at which blood relations are running for president this time around.

Below are various sources and articles for your consideration.

Shoot the messenger if you feel that will ease the pain and aid in the denial of your own disposition. One gets used to these things when one reveals the reality of things over their perception.

If you don’t know or don’t care why all of this matters, well, its not just some deep and unfathomable conspiracy, it is merely the nature of this nation and of its political structure of sovereignty. The illegitimate and adultrerous (adult) public citizenships (that’s you) may only pretend to “popularly” (as goyim) choose between two of our already sovereign rulers (private bloodline People of each of the several States). If you don’t believe this or don’t know about who it is you pledge allegiance to (hint: it aint a flag), then just enjoy the irony and history and write it off as coincidence or as some degree of separation. You wouldn’t be the first. Or the last.

For the rest of you, put on your sunglasses with Hoffman lenses, and simply repeat after the late great Rowdy Roddy Piper when he saw reality for the first time…

“It figures it would be something like this.”

(Note: If pictures in this post do not show themselves, please see links provided.)

–=–

Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton: Candidates Are Related, According To Genealogists

Genealogists found that Trump and Clinton are 19th cousins, sharing a common ancestor from England 18 generations ago.

Aug 26, 2015

John of Gaunt, 1st Duke of Lancaster, married Katherine Swynford, Duchess of Lancaster, and John and Katherine are Donald and Hillary’s shared 18th great grandparents,” reports “Extra.”

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump and his Democratic rival Hillary Clinton don’t have much in common in terms of policy, but as for heritage, the two front-runners are reportedly related.

According to a report from the “Extra” entertainment show, genealogists found that Trump and Clinton are 19th cousins, sharing a common ancestor from England 18 generations ago.

Genealogy experts at Geni.com said the real estate mogul and former secretary of state are the direct descendants of the 14th century first Duke of Lancaster, John of Gaunt, and his wife Katherine Swynford. Swynford was Gaunt’s mistress but they later married and their children were legitimizedaccording to the Daily Mail.

“John of Gaunt, 1st Duke of Lancaster, married Katherine Swynford, Duchess of Lancaster, and John and Katherine are Donald and Hillary’s shared 18th GREAT GRANDPARENTS,” reports “Extra.”

Hillary Clinton is a descendant of one of their children, Joan Beaufort. Her brother, John Beaufort, is an ancestor of Trump.

And it turns out that their 19th great grandfather is King Edward III, according to author A.J. Jacobs, who studied Geni’s research. “So there is a precedent for ruling a country; it’s in their genes,” Jacobs told the television program.

During Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign, researchers revealed that she was a distant cousin of Celine Deon, Madonna and Alanis Morissette. They also found that Angelina Jolie is Clinton’s ninth cousin twice removed.

Perhaps more surprisingly, President Barack Obama and former Vice President Dick Cheney are actually eighth cousins, revealed Cheney’s wife Lynne in 2007 while researching her ancestry for her memoir, reports The Hill.

“Every family has a black sheep,” Obama spokesman Bill Burton said at the time.

Link–> http://www.hngn.com/articles/123246/20150826/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-candidates-related-according-genealogists.htm

–=–

Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton Are Related – And This is How

Posted August 25, 2015
Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton may be on opposing sides of the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election, but perhaps a new familial connection may help bring them a little closer.
Yep, that’s right – the current leading GOP candidate, Donald Trump, is related to Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton!
As revealed today on Extra TV, Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton are 19th cousins! The unexpected relationship was found through Geni’s World Family Tree, the definitive family tree of the entire world.

 

Donald-Trump+is+related+to+Hillary-Rodham-Clinton-former-U-S-Secretary-of-State.png

Their family trees converge at their 18th great grandparents, John of Gaunt, 1st Duke of Lancaster, and Katherine Swynford, Duchess of Lancaster.

John of Gaunt and Katherine Swynford are the parents of Joan Beaufort, Countess of Westmorland, Clinton’s 17th great grandmother, and John Beaufort, 1st Earl of Somerset, who is Trump’s 17th great grandfather.

Their relationship to each other is not the only surprise for the Presidential hopefuls. It turns out they are also related to royalty – King Edward III of England is their 19th great grandfather…

Link–> http://www.geni.com/blog/donald-trump-and-hillary-clinton-are-related-and-this-is-how-390111.html

–=–

donald-hillary-genealogy-2-395x1024-395x1024.jpg

Link–>http://www.conspiracyclub.co/2015/09/04/bombshell-hillary-clinton-and-donald-trump-are-cousins/

–=–

Obama, Clinton and McCain have some famous relations

…McCain is a sixth cousin of first lady Laura Bush…

Obama has a prolific presidential lineage that features Democrats and Republicans. His distant cousins include President George W. Bush and his father, George H.W. Bush, Gerald Ford, Lyndon Johnson, Harry S. Truman and James Madison. Other Obama cousins include Vice President Dick Cheney, British Prime Minister Sir Winston Churchill and Civil War Gen. Robert E. Lee.

“His kinships are across the political spectrum”…

Clinton’s distant cousins include beatnik author Jack Kerouac and Camilla Parker-Bowles, wife of Prince Charles of England…

Obama and President Bush are 10th cousins, once removed, linked by Samuel Hinkley of Cape Cod, who died in 1662.

 Link–> http://www.heraldnet.com/article/20080326/NEWS02/151343661

–=–

Obama and Bush are Cousins!

Hell froze over. A month of Sundays hit the calendar. Barack Obama and George W. Bush are cousins.

According to Factcheck.org, Obama and Bush are 11th cousins, both descended from Samuel Hinckley, who lived in Massachusetts in the 17th century.

Meanwhile, Obama is also related — even more closely — to Dick Cheney. They are eighth cousins, both descended from a French Huguenot named Mareen Duvall who settled in Maryland in the 17th century.

No word on whether the Obamas are going to be invited to the Bush family reunions each summer in Maine.

Link–> http://kristof.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/03/21/obama-and-bush-are-cousins/?_r=1

–=–

PRESIDENT OBAMA IS COUSIN TO SENATOR TED CRUZ

…President Barack Obama is a Democrat who was previously an Illinois Senator. Ted Cruz is a Republican who is a United States Senator from Texas and who is currently running for President. These two do not have a history of getting along very well. You might remember the time when the United States government shut down in 2014. Obama and Cruz held opposing viewpoints about that situation.

A.J. Jacobs figured out that Barack Obama and Ted Cruz are related to each other. They are cousins. It turns out that Ted Cruz is the husband of Barack Obama’s 14th cousin once removed. In other words, Heidi Suzanne Cruz is Obama’s 14th cousin, once removed

This isn’t where the story ends, though. A.J. Jacobs found that President Obama has 44 cousins in the United States Senate. Many of them just so happen to be Republican. One of them is Pat Roberts, a United States Senator from Kansas. Roberts is Obama’s 13th cousin, four times removed. Jeff Flake, a Senator from Arizona, is President Obama’s 8th cousin, three times removed.

A.J. Jacobs wrote an article for The Guardian in which he lists all 44 of Barack Obama’s cousins who are in the Senate. The list includes some Senators who are Democrats, and some who are Republicans.

For example, Mark Begich, a Democrat Senator from Alaska, is Obama’s 11th cousin, once removed. Richard Durbin, a Democrat Senator from Illinois, is Obama’s 18th cousin. Barbara Boxer, a Democrat Senator from California, is Obama’s sixth cousin four time’s removed’s husband’s grandson’s ex-wife’s mother…

Link–> http://www.familytree.com/blog/president-obama-is-cousin-to-senator-ted-cruz/

–=–

Obama has 44 cousins in the Senate. Now can’t we all just get along?

It’s been a tough week for the Obama family.

On Tuesday night, Barack Obama’s second cousin – a radiologist named Milton Wolf – lost the closer-than-expected Republican primary for US Senate in Kansas. Wolf and Obama share a relatively recent ancestor, a 19th century farm laborer named Thomas McCurry. Barack leaned left, Milton leaned right – he was a Tea Party candidate who believed his second cousin was “destroying America”. But still, they are, officially, kin.

So now Barack Obama is deprived of having a cousin in the US Senate.

Or is he?

I’m working with a team of researchers who are building the biggest family tree in history. And I’ve got good news for President Obama: it turns out that the man who defeated Wolf, the incumbent Kansas senator Pat Roberts, is also his cousin. Really. Roberts is Obama’s 13th cousin, four times removed.

In fact, we’ve found that Obama has no less than 44 confirmed cousins in the Senate, including Texas Republican Ted Cruz (the husband of Obama’s 14th cousin, once removed) and Arizona Republican Jeff Flake (Obama’s eighth cousin, three times removed). And more to come. In the next few months, we plan to figure out how all 100 senators are connected to each other. One big happy, dysfunctional family…

And admittedly, there have been plenty of political family feuds in the past. Franklin Roosevelt campaigned against his cousin Teddy Roosevelt Jr, who was running for New York governor, calling his record “wretched”. Liz Cheney and Mary Cheney are bitterly divided on the issue of gay marriage.

But there have also been many, many political families that found a way to work together and support each other. The Bushes, the Kennedys, the Clintons, the current congressional (first) cousins Mark Udall and Tom Udall, who have co-sponsored legislation with each other and worked with their second cousin, Senator Mike Lee, but not their double second cousin, former Senator Gordon Smith…

Then, a few weeks ago, I went down to Houston to interview my distant cousin, George HW Bush (just 19 steps away through marriage!). I told the former president that he’s eighth cousins with Bill Clinton. He seemed pleased. His wife Barbara Bush chimed in, saying, “I always thought he might be my son from another mother. So I’m not surprised.”…

All of Barack Obama’s cousins in the US Senate (so far)*

  1. Lamar Alexander (R-Tennessee) is Obama’s 14th cousin, thrice removed
  2. Kelly Ayotte (R-New Hampshire) is Obama’s second cousin nine times removed’s husband’s third great nephew’s wife’s great niece’s husband’s first cousin twice removed’s second cousin’s wife
  3. Mark Begich (D-Alaska) is Obama’s 11th cousin, once removed
  4. Michael Bennet (D-Colorado) is Obama’s 13th cousin, twice removed
  5. Richard Blumenthal (D-Connecticut) is Obama’s wife’s second cousin five times removed’s wife’s second cousin five times removed’s husband’s second cousin’s husband’s brother
  6. Roy Blunt (R-Missouri) is Obama’s third cousin seven times removed’s wife’s first cousin, five times removed
  7. Barbara Boxer (D-California) is Obama’s sixth cousin four times removed’s husband’s grandson’s ex-wife’s mother
  8. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) is Obama’s fourth cousin four times removed’s husband’s sister’s husband’s aunt’s husband’s second great nephew
  9. Benjamin Cardin (D-Maryland) is Obama’s ninth great aunt’s sister’s husband’s wife’s 9th great grandson’s wife’s uncle’s wife’s first cousin once removed’s husband’s nephew
  10. Thomas Carper (D-Delaware) is Obama’s 17th cousin, twice removed
  11. Robert Casey (D-PA) is Obama’s 17th cousin, once removed
  12. Daniel Coates (R-Indiana) is Obama’s 11th cousin, thrice removed
  13. Tom Coburn (R-Oklahoma) is Obama’s 15th cousin, once removed
  14. Thad Cochran (Mississippi) is Obama’s 12th cousin, once removed
  15. Michael Crapo (R-Idaho) Obama’s 16th cousin, once removed
  16. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) is Obama’s 14th cousin once removed’s husband
  17. Richard Durbin (D-Illinois) is Obama’s 18th cousin
  18. Mike Enzi (R-Wyoming) is Obama’s third cousin nine times removed’s husband’s eighth great nephew
  19. Jeff Flake (R-Arizona) is Obama’s eighth cousin, three times removed
  20. Al Franken (D-Minnesota) is Obama’s second cousin eight times removed’s wife’s husband’s second cousin five times removed’s husband’s second cousin
  21. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) is Obama’s 17th cousin
  22. Kay Hagan (D-North Carolina) is Obama’s 15th cousin
  23. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) is Obama’s ninth cousin, thrice removed
  24. Tim Kaine (D-Virginia) is Obama’s seventh cousin’s ex-wife’s third cousin’s husband
  25. Angus King (I-Maine) is Obama’s ninth cousin twice removed’s wife’s first cousin once removed
  26. Mary Landrieu (D-Louisiana) is Obama’s sixth cousin four times removed’s husband’s third great niece’s husband’s uncle’s granddaughter
  27. Mike Lee (R-Utah) is Obama’s 10th cousin, once removed
  28. John McCain (R-Arizona) is Obama’s 11th cousin, twice removed
  29. Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) is Obama’s eighth great aunt’s first cousin thrice removed’s husband’s fifth great nephew
  30. Barbara Mikulski (D-Maryland) is Obama’s 10th great aunt’s brother’s wife’s sixth great niece’s ex-husband’s aunt’s husband’s first cousin once removed’s wife’s niece’s husband’s first cousin
  31. Bill Nelson (D-Florida) is Obama’s 14th cousin, once removed
  32. Rand Paul (R-Kentucky) is Obama’s fifth cousin five times removed’s husband’s third cousin five times removed
  33. Mark Pryor (D-Arkansas) is Obama’s 12th cousin
  34. Harry Reid (D-Nevada) is Obama’s 15th cousin, once removed
  35. James Risch (R-Idaho) is Obama’s eighth cousin once removed’s wife’s first cousin’s wife’s nephew
  36. Pat Roberts (R-Kansas) is Obama’s 13th cousin, four times removed
  37. Jay Rockefeller (D-West Virginia) is Obama’s 12th cousin
  38. Jeff Sessions (R-Alabama) is Obama’s 12th cousin, thrice removed
  39. Richard C Shelby (R-Alabama) is Obama’s 17th cousin, once removed
  40. Mark Udall (D-Colorado) is Obama’s 10th cousin, once removed
  41. Tom Udall (D-New Mexico) is Obama’s 11th cousin, once removed
  42. David Vitter (R-Louisiana) is Obama’s first cousin seven times removed’s wife’s great niece’s husband’s second cousin thrice removed’s wife’s third cousin
  43. Elizabeth Warren (D – Massachusetts) is Obama’s ninth great aunt’s third great nephew’s wife’s second great niece
  44. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-Rhode Island) is Obama’s 14th cousin, five times removed

* These connections were found by researchers at Geni.com and WikiTree.com. We strive for accuracy (even more than the Senate itself), but if you have any corrections, please contact GlobalFamilyReunion.com.

Link–> http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/aug/07/obama-cousins-senate-family-tree

–=–

Obama Ancestry:

Obama is of mixed African and Caucasian parentage.

His father, Barack Obama Sr., is an ethnic Kenyan Luo from the Nyanza province. His mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, is a Caucasian American of English, Scottish, Irish, French, Swiss, German and Welsh descent. Dunham’s great-great-great-great-great grandfather from the maternal line, Christian Gutknecht (Goodnight), originally hailed from Bischwiller, France, and arrived here in 1749 with his Swiss-German wife, Maria Magdalena Grüholtz (1723- unknown).

Dunham’s eighth generation paternal grandfather, Jonathan Singletary Dunham (1639-1724), is of English/Scottish stock. His lineage can be traced back to Edward I of England (1239 – 1307) and William the Lion (1143–1214). Robert Perry (1785-1852), her great-great-great grandfather from her maternal line, is a Welshmen. Dunham’s paternal great-great grandfather, Falmouth Kearney (1830-1878), arrived in New York City in 1850 from Moneygall, Ireland.

Obama, through his maternal great-great-great-great-great-great grandfather, Philip Ament (1755-1836), is related to Lyndon B. Johnson, the country’s 36th President, who is the great- great- great-grandson of Ament. He is also the eighth cousin, twice removed, of the 39th President, Jimmy Carter, through his seventh generation maternal grandfather, Moses Teague (1718-1799). Interestingly, Obama is the tenth cousin of former presidents Gerald Ford (once removed), George H.W Bush (once removed) and George W. Bush (twice removed) through his tenth generation paternal grandfather, Samuel Hinckley (1589-1662). Obama is, additionally, the distant relative of two more former United States Presidents, James Madison and Harry Truman, as well as former Vice President, Dick Cheney.

Link–> http://2012.candidate-comparison.org/?compare=Romney&vs=Obama&on=Ancestry

–=–

ancestry1.jpg

ancestry2.jpg

Links–>

http://s217.photobucket.com/user/yankeerose01/media/ancestry1.jpg.html

http://s217.photobucket.com/user/yankeerose01/media/ancestry2.jpg.html

–=–

Presidents related to earlier presidents:

James Madison: half first cousin twice removed of George Washington

John Quincy Adams: son of John Adams

Zachary Taylor: second cousin of James Madison

Grover Cleveland: sixth cousin once removed of Ulysses Grant

Benjamin Harrison: grandson of William Henry Harrison

Theodore Roosevelt: third cousin twice removed of Martin Van Buren

Franklin Roosevelt: fourth cousin once removed of Ulysses Grant, fourth cousin three times removed of Zachary Taylor, fifth cousin of Theodore Roosevelt

Harry Truman: great-great-great nephew of John Tyler

Richard Nixon: seventh cousin twice removed of William Taft, eighth cousin once removed of Herbert Hoover

George Bush: fifth cousin four times removed of Franklin Pierce, seventh cousin three times removed of Theodore Roosevelt, seventh cousin four times removed of Abraham Lincoln, eleventh cousin once removed of Gerald Ford

George W. Bush: son of George Bush

Link–>http://www.heptune.com/preslist.html

–=–

Jenna Bush: Hillary Clinton and I are ‘related’ through ‘Uncle’ Bill – George W Bush’s ‘brother from another mother’

Former first-daughter Jenna Bush-Hager joked about her Clinton family ties at a charity gala earlier this week.

When former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton took the stage, she spoke about the ‘special feeling of kinship’ she had for Jenna.

Here’s some family ties you may just be learning about: apparently Jenna Bush-Hager is related to Hillary Clinton.

At least, that’s what the former first-daughter said at a benefit for the Save the Children organization in New York earlier this week.

Jenna was the emcee of the gala and spoke about the family ties she had with one of the evening’s honorees –  former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

‘I’m not sure if you know this, but Secretary Clinton and I are actually related,’ Jenna announced.

‘Yes, she’s married to by uncle Bill. Uncle Bill has become so close with my grandparents and my father…that my dad calls him a brother from another mother.’

Later in the evening, Secretary Clinton took the stage and spoke of the ‘special feeling of kinship’ she had with Jenna.

‘It is an unusual experience living in the White House and I am so proud of what you’re doing,’ Sec Clinton said. ‘So I join your Uncle Bill in telling you “keep at it”.’…

Link–> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2443961/Jenna-Bush-Hillary-Clinton-related-marriage-uncle-Bill–George-W-Bushs-brother-mother.html

–=–

Bush’s Famous Family Tree

It was revealed recently that Vice President Dick Cheney and Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama are distant cousins.

This week, thanks to a New York Post story about genealogy, we’re getting a glimpse at the rather surprising family tree of President Bush himself, reports CBS News Early Show national correspondent Tracy Smith.

We all know who the president’s father is, but what about his cousins?

Thanks to research done by Ancestry.com, we know that Cheney, the man who’s only a heartbeat away from the presidency, is actually a blood relation to the president. He’s Bush’s Mr. ninth cousin once removed.

Cheney’s cousin, Obama, is also Mr. Bush’s 11th cousin, and the ninth cousin of actor Brad Pitt.

But we’re only getting started: Abraham Lincoln was Mr. Bush’s seventh cousin, five times removed.

And Mr. Bush shared more than just a ballot with John Kerry in 2004 — that’s right, they’re ninth cousins, twice removed.

There’s also royalty in the Bush bloodline. Princess Diana was Mr. Bush’s 11th cousin, twice removed.

And then there’s this bombshell: Marilyn Monroe, known for wishing John F. Kennedy a happy birthday, is Mr. Bush’s ninth cousin, three times removed.

He’s also related to Playboy founder Hugh Hefner, Native American princess Pocahontas, and Vlad the Impaler.

Trace the family tree far enough, and you get Madonna, Celine Dion and Tom Hanks — which shows that genealogy can sometimes be like a box of chocolates: You never know who you’re gonna get.

Link–> http://www.cbsnews.com/news/bushs-famous-family-tree/
–=–
Some Famous Cousins of Senator John Forbes Kerry President George W. Bush
Agatha Christie 18th cousin twice removed 20th cousin 3 times removed
Alan B. Shepard, Jr. Half 8th cousin twice removed 8th cousin twice removed
Aldous Huxley 15th cousin 4 times removed 15th cousin 6 times removed
Alec Baldwin 11th cousin twice removed
Anthony Perkins 17th cousin once removed 10th cousin twice removed
Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr. 10th cousin once removed 9th cousin once removed
Bette Davis 9th cousin 10th cousin twice removed
Bing Crosby Half 9th cousin once removed
Bridget Fonda 8th cousin
Brigham Young 11th cousin 4 times removed 5th cousin 6 times removed
Brooke Shields 22nd cousin once removed 11th cousin
Bruce Harrison 16th cousin once removed 20th cousin
Charles Darwin 11th cousin 4 times removed 14th cousin 5 times removed
Clara Barton 8th cousin 3 times removed 6th cousin 6 times removed
Clint Eastwood 10th cousin once removed 18th cousin
David Crosby 17th cousin once removed 8th cousin once removed
Emily Dickinson 8th cousin once removed 5th cousin 5 times removed
Ernest Hemingway 20th cousin twice removed 22nd cousin once removed
Francis Scott Key 11th cousin 3 times removed 13th cousin 6 times removed
Gary Trudeau 9th cousin once removed
George Orwell 15th cousin twice removed 12th cousin 8 times removed
Georgia O’Keeffe 14th cousin once removed 9th cousin 3 times removed
General Benedict Arnold Half 16th cousin once removed 4th cousin 8 times removed
General Douglas MacArthur 8th cousin once removed Half 14th cousin 5 times removed
General George Patton 13th cousin once removed 17th cousin twice removed
General Robert E. Lee 11th cousin 3 times removed 11th cousin 7 times removed
General Tom Thumb 7th cousin 5 times removed
George Gilder Half 23rd cousin 8th cousin 3 times removed
George Plimpton 9th cousin twice removed
Glenn Close 10th cousin twice removed
Governor Howard Dean 9th cousin 9th cousin
Grandma Moses Half 10th cousin once removed 7th cousin 5 times removed
Henry David Thoreau 19th cousin once removed 5th cousin 6 times removed
Henry Wadsworth Longfellow 20th cousin 4th cousin 5 times removed
Hugh Hefner 9th cousin once removed 9th cousin twice removed
Humphrey Bogart Half 8th cousin once removed 8th cousin once removed
J. P. Morgan 6th cousin 3 times removed 7th cousin 4 times removed
Jack London 8th cousin once removed Half 15th cousin 4 times removed
Jamie Lee Curtis Half 19th cousin 3 times removed 10th cousin once removed
Jane Wyatt 16th cousin twice removed 7th cousin twice removed
Joanne Woodward 20th cousin 3 times removed Half 18th cousin
John D. Rockefeller 16th cousin 8th cousin 3 times removed
John Hinckley, Jr. 10th cousin once removed 9th cousin
Johnny Appleseed Half 5th cousin 4 times removed 6th cousin 6 times removed
Johnny Carson Half 17th cousin 5 times removed 10th cousin 4 times removed
Joseph Smith, Jr. 6th cousin 6 times removed
Julie Harris 10th cousin
Katharine Hepburn 10th cousin once removed 10th cousin twice removed
L. Ron Hubbard 10th cousin
Lee Marvin 14th cousin once removed 18th cousin once removed
Louisa May Alcott 25th cousin 4th cousin 4 times removed
Lucille “I Love Lucy” Ball 17th cousin twice removed 18th cousin 3 times removed
Margaret Mead 9th cousin once removed
Marilyn Monroe 9th cousin once removed 9th cousin twice removed
Marjorie Merriwether Post 12th cousin twice removed 7th cousin 5 times removed
Marshall Field V 15th cousin 4 times removed 10th cousin once removed
Meriwether Lewis  14th cousin 12th cousin 8 times removed
Michael Douglas 16th cousin twice removed 9th cousin
Montgomery Clift Half 12th cousin 5 times removed 6th cousin 4 times removed
Napoleon 10th cousin 6 times removed Half 12th cousin 6 times removed
Norman Rockwell 9th cousin twice removed Half 8th cousin 3 times removed
Oliver Platt 17th cousin twice removed 12th cousin
Olivia de Havilland 13th cousin 3 times removed Half 12th cousin 5 times removed
Orson Welles 10th cousin once removed 9th cousin 3 times removed
Pat Buchanan 10th cousin once removed
Pope Gregorius X 4th cousin 22 times removed 4th cousin 26 times removed
President George Walker Bush 9th cousin twice removed Self
Prince Emanuel Filiberto of Italy Half 16th cousin twice removed Half 18th cousin
Prince Leka II of the Albanians 23rd cousin once removed 10th cousin
Prince Felipe of Spain Half 16th cousin twice removed Half 18th cousin
Princess Alexandra of Greece Half 15th cousin once removed Half 15th cousin 3 times removed
Princess Diana 12th cousin twice removed 11th cousin once removed
Princess Margarita of Romania Half 16th cousin once removed Half 17th cousin once removed
Princess Victoria of Sweden Half 12th cousin twice removed Half 18th cousin
Queen Elizabeth II Half 12th cousin twice removed 13th cousin twice removed
Ralph Waldo Emerson 7th cousin 4 times removed 5th cousin 5 times removed
Robert Louis Stevenson 17th cousin once removed 18th cousin once removed
Sarah Ferguson Half 11th cousin 3 times removed 14th cousin
Senator Bob Graham 9th cousin once removed
Senator John Edwards 9th cousin
Senator John Forbes Kerry Self 9th cousin twice removed
Senator Orin Hatch 8th cousin once removed
Sigourney Weaver 10th cousin once removed
Susan B. Anthony 8th cousin 4 times removed 5th cousin 6 times removed
Tennessee Williams Half 8th cousin once removed Half 10th cousin
Thomas Edison 6th cousin 3 times removed 6th cousin 4 times removed
Truman Capote 22nd cousin 3 times removed 25th cousin once removed
Walt Disney 13th cousin once removed Half 8th cousin twice removed
Wild Bill Hickok 2nd cousin 5 times removed
Wright Brothers 18th cousin once removed 8th cousin 3 times removed
Some Presidential Cousins of Senator John Forbes Kerry President George Walker Bush
President John Quincy Adams 6th cousin 4 times removed 5th cousin 6 times removed
President Chester A. Arthur 6th cousin 5 times removed
President James Buchanan 11th cousin 7 times removed 11th cousin 7 times removed
Vice President Aaron Burr 5th cousin 6 times removed 6th cousin 8 times removed
President George Herbert Walker Bush 9th cousin once removed Father
President Jimmy Carter 9th cousin once removed 14th cousin 6 times removed
Vice President Dick Cheney 25th cousin once removed Half 10th cousin
President Grover Cleveland 12th cousin twice removed 7th cousin 3 times removed
Vice President George Clinton Half 7th cousin 5 times removed 8th cousin 14 times removed
President Calvin Coolidge 8th cousin once removed 6th cousin 3 times removed
Vice President George Mifflin Dallas Half 21st cousin Half 21st cousin 3 times removed
Vice President Charles Gates Dawes 5th cousin twice removed 6th cousin twice removed
Vice President Charles W. Fairbanks 18th cousin twice removed 6th cousin 4 times removed
President Millard Fillmore 4th cousin 6 times removed
President Gerald Ford 14th cousin 7th cousin once removed
President James A. Garfield 8th cousin 4 times removed 4th cousin 4 times removed
President Ulysses S. Grant 12th cousin 6 times removed 6th cousin 6 times removed
Vice President Hannibal Hamlin 7th cousin 4 times removed 5th cousin 5 times removed
President Warren G. Harding 18th cousin once removed 19th cousin 4 times removed
President Benjamin Harrison 6th cousin 5 times removed 12th cousin 6 times removed
President William Henry Harrison 11th cousin 5 times removed 10th cousin 8 times removed
President Rutherford B. Hayes Half 6th cousin twice removed 6th cousin 3 times removed
Vice President Garret Hobart Half 7th cousin twice removed 7th cousin 3 times removed
President Herbert Hoover Half 8th cousin twice removed 7th cousin 5 times removed
President Thomas Jefferson 11th cousin 5 times removed 12th cousin 7 times removed
President Abraham Lincoln 20th cousin 7th cousin 5 times removed
President James Madison 13th cousin 7 times removed 8th cousin 8 times removed
President James Monroe Half 11th cousin 6 times removed 12th cousin 7 times removed
Vice President Levi Parsons Morton Half 12th cousin once removed 6th cousin 6 times removed
President Richard Nixon 9th cousin once removed 9th cousin twice removed
President Franklin Pierce Half 12th cousin 5th cousin 5 times removed
President James Knox Polk 13th cousin 4 times removed Half 14th cousin 4 times removed
Vice President James Danforth Quayle 15th cousin 3 times removed 10th cousin once removed
Vice President Nelson Rockefeller Half 8th cousin 10th cousin once removed
President Franklin D. Roosevelt 4th cousin twice removed  6th cousin 4 times removed
President Theodore Roosevelt 15th cousin twice removed 7th cousin 4 times removed
Vice President James S. Sherman 9th cousin 3 times removed 6th cousin 5 times removed
President William Howard Taft 6th cousin twice removed 5th cousin 4 times removed
President Zachary Taylor 13th cousin 4 times removed 10th cousin 10 times removed
Vice President Henry Agard Wallace 20th cousin twice removed 10th cousin twice removed
President George Washington 8th cousin 5 times removed 11th cousin 8 times removed

Link–> http://www.familyforest.com/Kerry_Bush_Cousins.html

–=–

Some Famous Ancestors of
Senator John Forbes Kerry
President George W. Bush
King Constantine I of Alba
(B)
31st great-grandfather
33rd great-grandfather
Marc Anthony
55th great-grandfather
55th great-grandfather
King Ramiro I of Aragon
27th great-grandfather
30th great-grandfather
King Eochaid IV the Venomous of Argyll
34th great-grandfather
37th great-grandfather
Count Alfonso Ordonez of Asturias
29th great-grandfather
32nd great-grandfather
King Saint Sigebert III of Austrasia
36th great-grandfather
39th great-grandfather
Duke Leopold III the Saint of Austria
25th great-grandfather
28th great-grandfather
Count Raymund I of Barcelona
28th great-grandfather
31st great-grandfather
Duke Heinrich VII the Black of Bavaria
25th great-grandfather
28th great-grandfather
Earl Hugh “The Surety” Bigod
21st great-grandfather
25th great-grandfather
Earl Roger “The Surety” Bigod
22nd great-grandfather
24th great-grandfather
King Wratislaw II (I) of Bohemia
28th great-grandfather
30th great-grandfather
King Nominoe of Brittany
32nd great-grandfather
33rd great-grandfather
King Sisman I of Bulgaria
30th great-grandfather
33rd great-grandfather
King Chilperic of the Burgundians
42nd great-grandfather
45th great-grandfather
King Rudolph I of Burgundy
30th great-grandfather
32nd great-grandfather
Praetor G. Julius Caesar
58th great-grandfather
58th great-grandfather
Prince Uffa of Cardigan
40th great-grandfather
42nd great-grandfather
Count Severinus of Cartagena
41st great-grandfather
44th great-grandfather
King Alphonso III (VIII) the Noble of Castile
22nd great-grandfather
25th great-grandfather
Charlemagne
32nd great-grandfather
35th great-grandfather
King Coel of Colchester
47th great-grandfather
47th great-grandfather
Emperor Alexius I Comnenus
26th great-grandfather
29th great-grandfather
King Aodh of Connaught
39th great-grandfather
41st great-grandfather
William the Conqueror
24th great-grandfather
27th great-grandfather
Emperor Isaac II of Constantinople
23rd great-grandfather
26th great-grandfather
Duke Almus of Croatia
27th great-grandfather
31st great-grandfather
King Fergus Mor Mac Erc of Dalriada
44th great-grandfather
46th great-grandfather
Prince Bernard the Dane
28th great-grandfather
31st great-grandfather
Lord William “The Surety” d’Aubigny
23rd great-grandfather
25th great-grandfather
Earl Henry “The Surety” de Bohun
22nd great-grandfather
24th great-grandfather
Earl Gilbert “The Surety” de Clare
20th great-grandfather
22nd great-grandfather
Earl Richard “The Surety” de Clare
21st great-grandfather
23rd great-grandfather
William “The Surety” de Huntingfield
23rd great-grandfather
26th great-grandfather
Earl John “The Surety” de Lacy
20th great-grandfather
25th great-grandfather
William “The Surety” de Lanvallei
23rd great-grandfather
26th great-grandfather
Earl Sahet “The Surety” de Quincy
20th great-grandfather
25th great-grandfather
Baron Robert “The Surety” de Ros
23rd great-grandfather
23rd great-grandfather
Baron Geoffrey “The Surety” de Saye
23rd great-grandfather
Earl Robert “The Surety” de Vere
22nd great-grandfather
25th great-grandfather
King Roderigo Diaz of Valencia Del Cid
(E)
26th great-grandfather
29th great-grandfather
King Vermund the Sage of Denmark
49th great-grandfather
49th great-grandfather
King Saint Judicael of Domnonee
38th great-grandfather
41st great-grandfather
Nero “Drusus the Elder” Drusus
54th great-grandfather
54th great-grandfather
King Sithrich of Dublin
28th great-grandfather
28th great-grandfather
King Llyarch of Dyfed
30th great-grandfather
31st great-grandfather
Emperor Basilius of the East
31st great-grandfather
33rd great-grandfather
King Alfred the Great of England
29th great-grandfather
32nd great-grandfather
King Edward I “Longshanks” of England
(E)
19th great-grandfather
22nd great-grandfather
Baron Robert “The Surety” FitzWalter
20th great-grandfather
23rd great-grandfather
King Philip II Augustus of France
22nd great-grandfather
25th great-grandfather
King Marcomir IV of the Franconia
56th great-grandfather
59th great-grandfather
Duke Genebald I of the East Franks
47th great-grandfather
50th great-grandfather
King Eistein of Frondheim
33rd great-grandfather
35th great-grandfather
Count Gerald I of Geneva
26th great-grandfather
30th great-grandfather
King Elemund of the Gepidae
45th great-grandfather
47th great-grandfather
Emperor Henry I the Fowler of Germany
28th great-grandfather
33rd great-grandfather
King Constantine I the Great
45th great-grandfather
45th great-grandfather
Harold the Greenlander
29th great-grandfather
32nd great-grandfather
King Einion the Impetuous of Gwynedd
44th great-grandfather
46th great-grandfather
King Andreas I of Hungary
29th great-grandfather
31st great-grandfather
King Prasutagus of the Iceni
52nd great-grandfather
52nd great-grandfather
King Nial I of Ireland
42nd great-grandfather
44th great-grandfather
Emperor Berenger I of Italy
30th great-grandfather
33rd great-grandfather
King Jean de Brienne of Jerusalem
22nd great-grandfather
26th great-grandfather
Grand Duke Sviatpolk II of Kiev
27th great-grandfather
30th great-grandfather
Prince Kuthen Khan of the Kumans
23rd great-grandfather
27th great-grandfather
Emperor Romanus I Lecaphenus
30th great-grandfather
32nd great-grandfather
King Cairbe of Leinster
40th great-grandfather
42nd great-grandfather
King Ferdinand III the Saint of Castile & Leon
(E)
20th great-grandfather
23rd great-grandfather
King Audoin of the Lombards
45th great-grandfather
48th great-grandfather
King Lothaire of Lorraine
31st great-grandfather
33rd great-grandfather
Lord William “The Surety” Malet
22nd great-grandfather
25th great-grandfather
King Suibne of Meath
39th great-grandfather
41st great-grandfather
King Crida of Mercia
39th great-grandfather
41st great-grandfather
Viscount Eliprand of Milan
27th great-grandfather
30th great-grandfather
Earl Rogvald the Mighty of Moere
29th great-grandfather
32nd great-grandfather
Prince Grimald of Monaco
27th great-grandfather
30th great-grandfather
Duke Adalbertus of the Mossele
44th great-grandfather
46th great-grandfather
King Aonghus of Munster
43rd great-grandfather
45th great-grandfather
Duke Sergius I of Naples
36th great-grandfather
39th great-grandfather
King Sancho I El Reparador of Navarre
31st great-grandfather
34th great-grandfather
Emperor Theodore Laskaris of Nicaea
24th great-grandfather
28th great-grandfather
Duke Richard I the Fearless of Normandy
26th great-grandfather
29th great-grandfather
King Sithric of Dublin & Northumberland
30th great-grandfather
30th great-grandfather
King Harold I of Norway
30th great-grandfather
33rd great-grandfather
Prince Mstislav of Novgorod
25th great-grandfather
29th great-grandfather
Prince Mistui II of the Obotrites
29th great-grandfather
31st great-grandfather
Gaius Octavius
56th great-grandfather
56th great-grandfather
Odin, Founder of Scandinavia
54th great-grandfather
54th great-grandfather
King Halfdan the Old
31st great-grandfather
34th great-grandfather
Prince Colman Mor of Ossory
42nd great-grandfather
45th great-grandfather
King Winithar of the Ostrogoths
45th great-grandfather
48th great-grandfather
Count Robert the Strong of Paris
30th great-grandfather
32nd great-grandfather
Emperor Leo VI the Philosopher
30th great-grandfather
32nd great-grandfather
King Garnard of the Picts
38th great-grandfather
40th great-grandfather
King Miesco I of Poland
30th great-grandfather
33rd great-grandfather
Prince Kotak of the Polowzes
25th great-grandfather
29th great-grandfather
Emperor Constantine VIII Porphyrogenitus
29th great-grandfather
31st great-grandfather
King Alphonso I of Portugal
23rd great-grandfather
26th great-grandfather
Prince Brochmael I of Powys
40th great-grandfather
42nd great-grandfather
King Boso d’Auton of Provence
30th great-grandfather
35th great-grandfather
Count Walpert of Ringleheim
31st great-grandfather
34th great-grandfather
King Hroar of Roeskilde
40th great-grandfather
40th great-grandfather
Grand Duke Igor I of Russia
29th great-grandfather
31st great-grandfather
Saint Hermengild
40th great-grandfather
43rd great-grandfather
Prince Guaimar I of Salerno
31st great-grandfather
34th great-grandfather
Barisome III of Sardinia
29th great-grandfather
32nd great-grandfather
Count Amadeus III of Savoy
24th great-grandfather
27th great-grandfather
King Hulderic of Saxons
39th great-grandfather
41st great-grandfather
Duke Otho I the Illustrious of Saxony
29th great-grandfather
32nd great-grandfather
King David I the Saint of Scotland
23rd great-grandfather
25th great-grandfather
King Robert the Bruce of Scotland
(E)
20th great-grandfather
20th great-grandfather
Prince Guelph of the Scyrri
41st great-grandfather
44th great-grandfather
Prince Stephen Urosh I of Serbia
27th great-grandfather
31st great-grandfather
King Saint Cyllin of Siluria
51st great-grandfather
51st great-grandfather
King Dobromi I of Slavs
30th great-grandfather
33rd great-grandfather
King Chilperic I of Soissons
39th great-grandfather
42nd great-grandfather
King Athanagild of Spain
41st great-grandfather
44th great-grandfather
Duke Boniface I of Spoleto
31st great-grandfather
34th great-grandfather
King Ceretic the Gwledig of Strathclyde
45th great-grandfather
47th great-grandfather
Duke Otokar I of Styria
31st great-grandfather
35th great-grandfather
Duke Childebrand of Suabia
33rd great-grandfather
36th great-grandfather
Emperor Philip of Swabia
22nd great-grandfather
25th great-grandfather
King Eric VI the Victorious of Sweden
28th great-grandfather
30th great-grandfather
King Saint Olav III of Sweden
(E)
27th great-grandfather
29th great-grandfather
King Donnell More of Thomond
24th great-grandfather
24th great-grandfather
King Eistein Glumra of Throndheim
31st great-grandfather
34th great-grandfather
King Conal Culban of Tirconnel
41st great-grandfather
43rd great-grandfather
Count Milon of Tonnerre
29th great-grandfather
33rd great-grandfather
King Wallia of Toulouse
45th great-grandfather
48th great-grandfather
Duke Reginpert of Turin
39th great-grandfather
41st great-grandfather
Marquis Bonifacio II of Tuscany
35th great-grandfather
38th great-grandfather
King Eochan of Tyrone
41st great-grandfather
43rd great-grandfather
Count Hugh the Great of Vermandois & Valois
24th great-grandfather
26th great-grandfather
King Hilderic of the Vandals
40th great-grandfather
40th great-grandfather
Doge Pietro Candiano I of Venice
32nd great-grandfather
35th great-grandfather
Count Albert the Pious of Vermandois
28th great-grandfather
30th great-grandfather
King Olaf of Vermland
32nd great-grandfather
35th great-grandfather
King Olaf I of Vestfold
36th great-grandfather
39th great-grandfather
Eystein the Viking
33rd great-grandfather
36th great-grandfather
King Saint Kadwalladyr of North Wales
36th great-grandfather
38th great-grandfather
King Saint Canute the Pious of Wendon
30th great-grandfather
27th great-grandfather
King Cerdic of Wessex
43rd great-grandfather
46th great-grandfather
King Pharamond of Westphalia
43rd great-grandfather
46th great-grandfather
Count Witekind II of Wettin
32nd great-grandfather
34th great-grandfather
Lord Cynddelw of Yale
31st great-grandfather
31st great-grandfather
Emperor Romanus II the Younger
28th great-grandfather
30th great-grandfather
Duke Berthold I of Zahringen
28th great-grandfather
32nd great-grandfather
Count Otto II of Zutphen
27th great-grandfather
30th great-grandfather

Link–> http://www.familyforest.com/Kerry_Bush_Ancestors.html

Good Faith Notice Of Render (Abandon) Of Surname And Withdrawal Of Christian Name


The following letter is from Daniel. For those that have not been privy to our discussions on the radio, please enjoy the commercial free interviews at the end of this post. This was what Daniel considers his final step in ridding his given name of any government encroachments. Before this, Daniel returned his government issued certificates, licenses, and any other official documents with the surname or social security insurance number attached, and also included copies of those within this letter.

The names have been made generic.

We will be following up in future shows starting today to explain in further detail this “Christian Remedy In Law”.

For those not willing to consider such a thing, I have created a mini-dictionary of Biblical words taken out of the legal dictionaries and compiled a very in depth essay that will explain this whole process not as a religious one, but as a completely legal one. Do not let the doctrines of religion get in the way of understanding the 1611 Bible as the basis of all legal law in the “civilized” world. Again, this is not religion, but legal fiction.

Please see my next blog post called “Cracking The Legal Code Of King James“, which will be posted immediately following this post tonight.

Link –> https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2014/04/30/cracking-the-legal-code-of-king-james/

Daniel’s Youtube site: https://www.youtube.com/user/ChristianRemedyInLaw

And now, as promised, not to be suffered by fools, Daniel’s Notice of Render And Abandon of Surname:

———————————————————-
Good Faith Notice Of Render (Abandon)
Of Surname And Withdrawal Of Christian Name
———————————————————-

(Page 1 of 5)

Greetings and salutations John-Que PUBLIC, Office of the Public Guardian and Trustee, Ministry of the Attorney General:

May the grace of Our Lord Jesus Christ be with you. The salutation by the hand of me, seed of Abraham, seed of the woman, Tribe of Judah (favour, praise), Christian name John, Ambassador and witness for Christ.

Verily, I make a good confession to all higher powers of government ordained by God (YHWH) just as my Sovereign, King, Master, Lord, Saviour, advocate and surety in all matters whatsoever, Jesus Christ, made a good confession to the Roman high priest and governor, Pontius Pilate:

John 18:36 [Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)] – Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.

I forgive and forget any and all trespasses that have occurred upon my God-given unalienable Christian name, John; and, therefore, I divorce and forsake the surname, SMITH, in order to divorce myself from any implied or expressed trespass upon it and I pray the Lord’s Prayer in this matter:

Matthew 6:9-13 [Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)] – 9 After this manner therefore pray ye: Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name. 10 Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven. 11 Give us this day our daily bread. 12 And forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors. 13 And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil: For thine is the kingdom, and the power, and the glory, for ever. Amen.

I have been in soulful prayer of moral conscience as to what is right and what is wrong with respect to the question of the use of the surname agnomen, fictio, arma, after-acquired property, SMITH, placed over my graced, true, original, God-given unalienable Christian real birth name, John. I give you good faith notice that as a set-apart Christian believer, bestowed the nativity God-given unalienable Christian name, John, known by my heavenly Father before the foundation of the world, or any secular foundation identity document, instrument of man’s factitious world, I cannot be involved in an implied dual allegiance to serve two masters. The Authorized 1611 King James Holy Bible admonishes me at Matthew 6:24 and states:

Matthew 6:24 [Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)] – No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.

Therefore, as an Act of God, bestowed the God-given unalienable Christian name John, being no part of the secular world of man or governments, I must stay within the protective realm of my Master, Lord, Saviour, Sovereign, advocate and surety, Jesus Christ’s Kingdom, in absolute loyalty, being neutral to the affairs of man’s constituted governments.

Under the definition of “Christian” the compact edition of the OXFORD ENGLISH DICTIONARY, Volume 2, states:

“6. Christian name. … When a man is made a spiritual peer he loses his sir-name; when a temporal, his christian-name.”

When a man accepts Christ as his Lord, Master and Saviour, he sheds the surname (sir-name), which is the “Antonomasia” [see definitions below], otherwise, to claim right to the surname would be a conflict of loyalties (allegiance), and it would place my Christian name, John, in future spiritual jeopardy with Almighty God (YHWH) and Jesus Christ, my Saviour, Master, Lord, advocate and surety.

I only desire conditions of peace with my fellow man and relinquish any thing in question that would express or imply that I, Christian name John, lay claim to war in any form whatsoever.

(Page 2 of 5)

ANTONOMASIA. Definition from the OXFORD ENGLISH DICTIONARY Latin, a. Greek … to name instead. The substitution of an epithet or appellative or the name of an office or dignity, for a person’s proper name, as the Iron Duke for Wellington, his grace for an archbishop. Also, conversely, the use of a proper name to express a general idea, as in calling an orator a Cicero, a wise judge, a Daniel. … a 1638 mede Wks. II. 332 That Capitolium by antonomasia is put for a Gentile Temple in general. … 1759 Adam Smith Mor. Sent. (1797) II. Any This way of speaking, which the grammarians call an antonomasia.

I, Christian name, John, having accepted my Lord, Master and surety, Christ Jesus, as my redeemer for I am called in the Lord and am a slave of the Lord, Christ Jesus, my Master. Therefore, I am the purchased property of the Lord Christ Jesus, King of kings and Lord of lords, a freeman called in the Lord Christ Jesus, and not the debtor property or servant of a gentile, pagan, unbeliever feudal lord or war-like insurgent secular freeman on the land who deceives himself by believing and acting as some factitious “thing” (surname) when he is no “thing” (see Galatians 6:3 AKJV).

1 Corinthians 7:21-23 [Authorized 1611 King James Version(AKJV)] – 21 Art thou called being a servant? are not for it: but if thou mayest be made free, use it rather. 22 For he that is called in the Lord, being a servant, is the Lord’s freeman: likewise also he that is called, being free, is Christ’s servant. 23 Ye are bought with a price; be not ye the servants of men.

Although my earthly parents were ignorant of the fact of the requirement of the true supreme spiritual duty to only serve Almighty God (YHWH), and remain under the absolute true supreme spiritual duty to serve the anointed of God (YHWH), Christ Jesus, the Lord of lords, King of kings, Prince of Peace, my Sovereign Master, I, bestowed the God-given unalienable Christian name John, must and do hereby forever quit claim, relinquish, yield up, forsake, disclaim, renounce, render and resign as surety (guarantor) for the after-acquired, secular, gentile, public interest thing, man’s person title, agnomen, debtor surname, SMITH, the property belonging to a secular master contrary to God (YHWH) and the anointed of God (YHWH), Christ Jesus, the Lord of lords, King of kings, Prince of Peace, my Sovereign Master, of whom I serve exclusively. It would be wrong and against my good moral conscience to commit spiritual suicide by being unequally yoked or joined in name to unbelievers by wearing a factitious badge of fraud, blasphemous, gentile, pagan, unbeliever, war title surname SMITH, although for unbelievers it may be customary to do so.

STRONG’S CONCORDANCE defines the Hebrew word “title” (H3655) as “surname” and Job 32:21-22 [AKJV] admonishes me that I must not accept the factitious badge of fraud, blasphemous, gentile, pagan, unbeliever, debtor, war title surname SMITH:

Job 32:21-22 [Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)] – 21 Let me not, I pray you, accept any man’s person, neither let me give flattering titles unto man. 22 For I know not to give flattering titles; in so doing my maker would soon take me away.

To innocence and life revealed, to death denied, to the triumph of the truth of the graced God-given unalienable Christian name, John (seed of the woman), overcoming the appearance of guilt of the condemned fictional, lie, accused, debtor, alienable surname (seed of the serpent), SMITH.

I am a Christian conscientious objector which is one who by reason of religious training or belief is conscientiously opposed to participation in war in any form and neutral to the affairs and titles of man’s secular world and constituted secular governments. As a true Christian I am conscientiously opposed on religious grounds to participation in war and need not be a member of a religious sect whose creed forbids participation in war to be entitled to classification as a conscientious objector. It is sufficient that I have a conscientious scruple against war in any form.

The surname is a form of war, which I refuse to claim and which I also do not consent to bear or take benefit from in any way whatsoever. I remove my consent and direct you to remove my God-given unalienable Christian name, John, photograph (image) and signature from any secular government documents expressing or implying my consent, to use the surname, SMITH, or to act as surety for it. It is treason against God (YHWH) and non-subjection to the higher powers of man’s government ordained (authorized) by God (YHWH) to claim right to and impersonate some “Thing” that does not belong to me as I am an Act of God, bestowed the God-given unalienable Christian real name John, not entitled to a secular surname.

(Page 3 of 5)

Therefore, I render and relinquish back the surname (title / property), SMITH, which does not belong to me, back to its true registered owner so that I am free of charge.

To be absolutely clear, I bestowed the private, peaceful, spiritual, graced, God-given unalienable Christian real name, John, Tribe of Judah (favour, praise), fellow citizen with the saints of Heavenly New Jerusalem, God’s (YHWH) Kingdom, no part of the secular world of gentile nations, hereby forever quit claim, relinquish, yield up, forsake, disclaim, renounce, render and resign as surety for the after-acquired, blasphemous, secular, gentile, public interest thing, man’s person title, agnomen, debtor surname, SMITH, the property belonging to a secular master contrary to God (YHWH) and the anointed of God (YHWH), Christ Jesus, the Lord of lords, King of kings, Prince of Peace, my Sovereign Master, of whom I serve exclusively.

I further renounce all common civil rights, which includes the right to money, gain, profit and claim to the title, agnomen, factitious surname SMITH, the public interest property of Her Majesty, that I was never entitled to claim right to as a son of the true God (YHWH) and slave of my Lord, King, Sovereign, surety and Master, Christ Jesus, the name above every name named.

In the event that your secular government of the Province of Ontario refuses to remove the blasphemy of the surname, SMITH, off the original STATEMENT OF BIRTH record, of which I am forbidden by God (YHWH) to use, then I remove my consent and God-given unalienable Christian name, John, off that original STATEMENT OF BIRTH record. A line must be drawn through the surname SMITH as this would be evidence of erasure or cancellation (blotting out).

To be clear, I direct you according to Colossians 2: 12-15 (AKJV) as I believe you to be the higher powers of government ordained by God (YHWH) to blot out, erasure, the blasphemous surname off the STATEMENT OF BIRTH record and provide me a “Certified A true copy” of this record verifying only my God-given unalienable Christian name, John, blotting out (cancelling) the ordinance of the law [i.e. certificate of debt, or BIRTH CERTIFICATE] containing the blasphemous surname, SMITH, written contrary to me as an Act of God (YHWH), unalienable set-apart Christian believer, bestowed the graced name John, a pardoned gift from God (YHWH). As a Christian I must be civilly dead to the constituted world of man.

Colossians 2:13-15 [Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)] – 13 And you, being dead in your sins and the uncircumcision of your flesh, hath he quickened together with him, having forgiven you all trespasses; 14 blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross; 15 and having spoiled principalities and powers, he made a shew of them openly, triumphing over them in it.

For further clarity, the Gideon’s New Testament wrote Colossians 2:14 as follows:

“having cancelled out the certificate of debt consisting of decrees written against us…”

To be clear, the “certificate of debt” is the Federal CITIZENSHIP CERTIFICATE and the Provincial BIRTH CERTIFICATE, which are Her Majesty’s property.

To be clear, remove my signature, photograph (image) and God-given unalienable Christian name, John from all Federal and Provincial (State) secular records or instruments implying my consent to act as surety for the property of another, that being the surname SMITH, which is foreign and blasphemous to God (YHWH) and me as a Christian believer.

Never communicate to me addressing me with the blasphemous agnomen surname SMITH, an unclean thing, a factitious blasphemous artifice of fraud, since you have been given good faith notice not to do so. I believe the use of the blasphemous surname is forbidden by both God (YHWH) and by your secular government. I do not require a license to be who I really am, that being the God-given unalienable Christian name John. A license is only required to impersonate the thing, person or property belonging to another (i.e. blasphemous, debtor secular surname).

Revelation 18:4 [Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)] – And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.

(Page 4 of 5)

The “Her” of Revelation is of the Roman Empire, which lays claim to the Roman civil surname thing, of which I lay no right or claim to in order to remain in peace and subjection to the higher powers of government as an Ambassador and witness for Christ.

It is only honest and logical if one continues to use the thing belonging to another, that being the surname that one would be under duty, debt and obligation to continue returning fees required for its use. If an individual believer in Christ Jesus, such as myself, relinquishes, renounces and gives up forever all claim and right to the surname to whomever is the feudal lord and master of it (i.e. Her Majesty and/or her duly appointed representatives) then one has in good faith returned to their original allegiance to Almighty God (YHWH) the Father and walks under the surety of Christ Jesus, the true Master, Sovereign, Lord of lords and King of Kings and Prince of Peace.

NOAH WEBSTER’S 1828 DICTIONARY OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE defines “RENDER” as,

“To yield or give up the command or possession of … to restore.”

Therefore, I hereby fully divorce myself from the gentile, civil, Roman, blasphemous, agnomen, debtor surname, SMITH, property belonging to another, of which is not mine, by fully restoring it to its proper owner, being Her Majesty. This is the final tax return as I am to render to Caesar what is Caesar’s, being the surname SMITH, the unnecessary addition of which creates the unequal yoke known as the combined “Legal Name” JOHN SMITH. I relinquish and renunciate all common right to gain or mammon or money in order to serve my true Father, God (YHWH), and his only begotten Son, my Saviour, Sovereign, Master, King of kings, Lord of Lords, Prince of Peace, advocate and surety in all matters whatsoever.

I, God given unalienable Christian name, John, must obey my true Father, God (YHWH):

Acts 5:29 [Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)] – Then Peter and the other apostles answered and said, We ought to obey God rather than men.

I give my Spirit, the God-given unalienable Christian name, John, to God (YHWH); and, I render the dead body corporate surname, SMITH, to Caesar, the thing belonging to Her Majesty, a gentile queen ordained to punish evil and reward good (see Romans 13:1-5 AKJV), who does not represent God’s (YHWH) Kingdom. The patriarchal Kingly Tribe of Judah does not appoint queens and Christ Jesus is the last King of the Tribe of Judah, being no part of the constituted world of man’s secular governments.

I, Christian name John will not bear arms, that being the surname SMITH or any symbol of war in any form for or against Her Majesty as I am a Christian peacemaker under the allegiance of Christ Jesus, my surety, being no part of man’s secular world. In summary, I believe that relinquishing the use of the surname SMITH is the only right honest thing to do to eliminate all confusion and to remain in good moral conscience with both the Supremacy of God (YHWH) and the rule of law.

My Christian Charter and Book of Authorities is the Authorized 1611 King James Holy Bible, which supports my Christian faith and my God-given unalienable Christian name, John, bestowed upon me as grace and pardon at birth, and I accept Christ Jesus, who acts as surety for me, blotting out all charges, fees and encumbrances (certificate of debt) written against me. God (YHWH) knew me before the foundation of the world. The baptised font Christian name bestowed upon me on the original STATEMENT OF BIRTH document blotted out the surname that was written contrary to me and took it out of the way by the power of Christ Jesus, my surety.

I declared my faith by water baptism on October 12, 2013 A.D. in a tributary of the Humber River in Caledon, Ontario, within PART OF LOT 1, CONCESSION 5, AND PART OF THE ROAD ALLOWANCE BETWEEN THE TOWNSHIPS OF ADJALA AND ALBION, TOWNSHIP OF ADJALA, COUNTY OF SIMCOE. I lay down the arma, agnomen surname SMITH, property of Her Majesty, and return to my original allegiance of peace to serve only God (YHWH) and his anointed King, Christ Jesus, my Master, Saviour and surety. May the grace of Our Lord Jesus Christ be with you all. The salutation by the hand of me, seed of Abraham, seed of the woman, Tribe of Judah (favour, praise), Christian name John, witness for Christ.

(Page 5 of 5)

By this good faith notice and as an Act of God (YHWH) I am now and forever free of all public alienable charges by this act of relinquishment of the surname SMITH, the property belonging to Her Majesty, of which I am not entitled to as a Christian disciple serving only my Lord, Master, Sovereign, Saviour and surety, Christ Jesus. I am no longer ignorant of the fact that Christ Jesus is my surety and has bestowed upon me the God-given unalienable nativity Christian name John, and am no longer ignorant of the law that forbids me to claim right to or use the alienable man-made positive law blasphemous war surname of fiction, SMITH, without consenting to accept the penalty for its use, which is treason against God (YHWH), and which I am not entitled to bear as an Ambassador and witness for Christ Jesus, my Sovereign, Master, Saviour, Lord of lords, King of kings and Prince of Peace.

   John  

God-given, real, unalienable Christian name John, Ambassador and witness for Christ Jesus. Dated this fourth day of April in the two thousand and fourteenth Year from the birth of Our Lord and Saviour, Jesus Christ, the King of kings, Sovereign, Master, Lord of lords, and Prince of Peace, my advocate and surety.

NOTE: Attached to this good faith notice I enclose copies of:

(1) Copy of long form (Form 2) STATEMENT OF BIRTH RECORD.- [ NOTE: This instrument cancelled all debt, expressed, implied or written, against my graced God-given unalienable nativity Christian fact, real name, John, the purchased property of Christ Jesus].

(2) Copies of all secular government-issued documents or instruments.

(3) Copy of the heraldry or coat-of-arms for the war surname SMITH

c.c.

Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth II.
Governor General of Canada.
Lieutenant Governor of the Province of Ontario.
Registrar General for the Province of Ontario.

b.c.c.

———————————————————————-

–=–

Confused? Think this is religious nonsense? What if the Bible isn’t about religion at all, but is instead a legal guide and remedy to escape from the tyranny of religion and government? What if the very authority of government stems from that very book, and we must therefore acknowledge the Biblical remedy to the Biblical law (testament).

View my exhaustive explanation and compendium of Biblical legal words here: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2014/04/30/cracking-the-legal-code-of-king-james/

And listen to our several interviews explaining the whole hidden meanings disclosed in Daniel’s above letter from The Corporation Nation Radio program here:

February 26th, 2014:

Download: http://corporationnationradioarchives.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/show88_feb26.mp3

March 5th, 2014:

Download: http://corporationnationradioarchives.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/show93_march05.mp3

March 12th, 2014:

Download: http://corporationnationradioarchives.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/show98_march121.mp3

March 19th, 2014:

Download: http://corporationnationradioarchives.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/show103_march19.mp3

March 26th, 2014:

Download: http://corporationnationradioarchives.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/show108_march26.mp3

April 2nd, 2014

Download: http://corporationnationradioarchives.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/show112_april02.mp3

April 9th, 2014:

Download: http://corporationnationradioarchives.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/show117_april09.mp3

April 16th, 2014:

Download: http://corporationnationradioarchives.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/show122_april16.mp3

April 18th, 2014:

Download: http://corporationnationradioarchives.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/show124_april18.mp3

April 23rd, 2014:

Download: http://corporationnationradioarchives.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/show127_april23.mp3

.

–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Wednesday, April 30th, 2014

It’s Time To Withdraw Your Membership To The United States!


Citizenship SchoolIf you are a member of an organization that begins to do things you don’t like, the rational course of action would be to withdraw your financial support to that organization and cease to be a member.

If your bank misbehaves or charges you ridiculous extra fees just because it can according to your “agreement” with the bank, the rational course of action would be to withdraw your financial support and cease to be a customer.

If your insurance coverage starts to diminish in quality or denies you your due benefits or coverage when you need it, the rational course of action would be to withdraw your financial support to that company and cease to be a member.

If my doctor or hospital began to practice bad medicine and cause more illness than it cured, the rational course of action would be to withdraw financial support to that hospital or doctor and cease to be a customer, and perhaps pursue alternative healing.

In fact, when we consider this repetitive logic, wouldn’t anyone be hard-pressed to think of any thing that might mistreat us as a member or customer that would not warrant the withdraw of financial support and termination of contract or membership?

So why then are people still voluntary members of the United States central government?

Do they enjoy the thought of future bad healthcare – which is really the quite unlawful forced commerce with insurance companies and not actual healthcare? If their membership to a corporation that gives them “benefits” suddenly forces them to accept bad medicine and bad insurance, isn’t the simple solution to end their membership to the main corporation?

Do the people enjoy paying taxes and unjust extortion fees and taxes for non-crimes just so that government can invest that money for itself without offering any benefit back to the people? Would it not be prudent to end that kind of business “relationship” with such a bad business?

Do people really believe that the meager benefit of “old-age insurance” called social security (socialism) is worth the vast amount of legal restrictions and tyrannies set forth upon them through their entire life – even when they could have invested their own money and walked away with double or triple what this administration will ever pay them – should they actually live through Obama-care? Do the people even know that there is no actual trust in their name – just a large investment fund that has been completely tapped for the national debt with no legal requirement to ever pay them anything? Do they know the difference between investing for themselves and their future and contributing (giving away) their hard-earned money to government? Do they realize where their money goes as government invests it into war, Monsanto, pharmaceuticals, and Think tanks?

Is there some misconception that being a “citizen” is somehow patriotic – that withdrawing their citizenship (membership) will make them less “American”?

Really? Because last time I checked, it was called the United States of America, not America of the United States.

Was there created at some point in history the fallacy that America is the central government called the United States – a 10 mile square municipal corporation that is not even one of the actual 50 states in the “union” ? Do the people actually believe that America is the United States?

Perhaps that misconception derives from the misunderstanding of just what citizenship is.

For citizenship is simply a membership, be it voluntary or forced through coercion and martial law, unilaterally agreed to by an individual. It is no different than a gym membership; where you must follow the rules set out in your agreement contract that only you sign. Like the government, the gym does not sign your contract. It is simply an agreement for membership to enjoy some benefits, as well as an agreement for you to follow their rules.

But what happens when the rules change without your consent?

What happens when the benefits diminish?

For instance, each state is a member of the Untied States, forced to hand over their unappropriated lands to the United States and draft new State constitutions after the Civil War under “reconstruction” and after agreeing to the terms of uniform “enabling acts” under duress. In fact, the civil war was nothing but a military takeover by a defunct central government under martial law of the lawfully succeeded sovereign states. They were forced back into contract membership with the new central government, one that was unlawfully created absent of the lawful participation of these states’ lawful congressmen. In their stead, military martial officers of law were forced into congress to replace the lawfully elected congressmen of each state. And under duress and at gunpoint, these states became members of this municipal corporation in Washington D.C, eventually dividing the entire territory of America into counties within states.

COUNTY. A district into which a state is divided.

2. The United States are generally divided into counties; counties are divided into townships or towns…

4. In some states, as Illinois; 1 Breese, R. 115; a county is considered as a corporation, in others it is only a quasi corporation.

5. In the English law this word signifies the same as shire, county being derived from the French and shire from the Saxon. Both these words signify a circuit or portion of the realm, into which the whole land is divided, for the better government thereof, and the more easy administration of justice. There is no part of England that is not within some county, and the shire-reve, (sheriff) originally a yearly officer, was the governor of the county. Four of the counties of England, viz. Lancaster, Chester, Durham and Ely, were called counties Palatine, which were jurisdictions of a peculiar nature, and held by, especial charter from the king. See stat. 27 H. VIII. c.25.

COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. Certain officers generally entrusted with the superintendence of the collection of the county taxes, and the disbursements made for the county. They are administrative officers, invested by the local laws with various powers.

***All legal definitions taken from Bouvier’s Law Dictioanry, 1856

Counties are nothing but municipal corporations; a network grid of contract issuers and enforcers for the United States government – acting under administrate local law with federal powers. Another word for administrative is contract. And all administrative law is simply the administration of the unilateral contractual relationship with you and government. The county has police officers. The gym has security guards. There is no difference. Police officers are just security guards for the county corporation. They’re authority is presumed, just as your citizenship that might grant them contractual authority over you is presumed.

UNILATERAL CONTRACT, civil law. When the party to whom an engagement is made, makes no express agreement on his part, the contract is called uni-lateral, even in cases where the law attaches certain obligations to his acceptance… A loan of money, and a loan for use, are of this kind.

One does not generally think of government as just another customer-based corporation, but this is exactly what it is. When signing a unilateral agreement (contract), one agrees to follow a certain set of de facto corporate rules and regulations (codes) as set out by government. This is the voluntary state of citizenship – a series of unilateral contractual agreements signed or unsigned (presumption of law) by the people of America.

This circumstance of multiple contractual obligations is often called the STRAWMAN, which is simply the “person” as defined and bound by these contracts. The “person” is artificial, as defined in US Code and the 14th Amendment (see below). The person is a corporate veil of the man, used for the purposes of contracts. And in administrative law, government can only contract with this artificial person. Government cannot regulate man, only the corporate person. Thus, administrative law has nothing to do with and no authority over living man, unless he or she is acting under the commercial activities described within their contractual relationship with government.

A driver’s license, for instance, is a unilateral contractual agreement by one man to follow the State government’s vehicle code, which is administrative law. Driving is administratively speaking a commercial activity. Thus, driving can be regulated by government… but only if the man agrees to become a commercial person while utilizing his automobile. He does this when he unilaterally agrees for no reason at all to agree with government that he is utilizing his car as a commercial “vehicle”, even when dropping the kids off at school. Even if that car is never used for any purpose in commerce pr commercial activities, the government still elicits people to obtain a commercial license to drive.

You see, this is the only way that government can have authority over you. It must trick you into entering into some agreement and contract for which you give your consent to its authority. Without this unilateral agreement, government cannot rule you and regulate every part of your life. It must convince you that the activities you participate in are within its authority as a legal activity before it can tell you they are illegal. And it must lie to you so as to convince you that using your car to travel is illegal unless you have a license to do so. For a license is nothing more than permission from government to do something illegal. In other words, every time you get into your vehicle and drive you are breaking the law by permission.

Though traveling in your personal automobile is not unlawful, driving commercially without a license is illegal – a breach of contract.

Perhaps most ironic about all of this is the simple realization that all of this contractual relationship nonsense is based on one and only one thing – your membership with the United States corporation in Washington D.C. This is the central hub of information. It is where your official artificial person is stored and maintains residence. And states and counties are just subdivisions of that corporation – artificial borders signifying United States jurisdiction, assigned federal locator codes called ZIP codes that are property of the United States. For the U.S. Postal Service is part of the United States corporation in Washington D.C. Your United States mail is not delivered to your home, it is delivered to your commercial address within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.

You must never forget that all of your commercial activities are being done inside of the United States jurisdiction – the artificial corporate veil that extends throughout the 50 states and beyond like a spider web, ensnaring the activities people like flies and spinning them into commercial persons.

Imagine in your mind that the entire land of America has a plastic coating over it for which all people walk upon as corporate persons and citizens of the United States, never really comprehending that this clear plastic coating of corporate person-hood separates their natural body from the natural land. The people walk and talk on this corporate veil of clear plastic as if it doesn’t exist and as if they are walking on the actual land – which ironically is a true statement. For corporatism is indeed artificial, just as the artificial person replaces the man in his or her transactions with the corporation government, so to does the United States replace the land of America with its veil of artificial person-hood called statutes and codes.

Yet just on the other side of this artificial construct lies the natural world, natural law, and all of the natural rights that existed before the people contractually agreed to give them up for government granted political rights. For tyranny and oppression is literally the contractual right of citizens of the United States.

For a deeper understanding of what a right actually is (and this reality will certainly surprise you), please take the time to study my expose’ here:

Link–> https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2013/02/19/tyranny-requires-equality/

Perhaps this love affair with citizenship stems from the fallacious belief that the United States is still the same old sovereign county it was when it was founded, before the civil war tore it apart and the defunct and unlawful United States glued it back together with legal tape and military oppression?

Well, I’ve got some bad news for you folks…

The United States is now a member of the United Nations… and the United States is referred to as a “sovereign state” by that international central government. Just like the states under contractual membership with the United States corporation in Washington D.C. are not referred to as “countries”, the 193 countries of the world under membership of the United Nations corporation are also not called “countries”. And it is not the people or the 50 states that are members of the United Nations, it is just this 10 mile square piece of land called the United States corporation that is a member.

So can a sovereign individual state be a member of such a central government and still be sovereign? And can a sovereign nation then still be sovereign as a member of an international government under international maritime and admiralty (military) law?

The United Nations doctrine for “statehood” rings familiar, sounding very much like the false paradigm of the rules of “statehood” for the 50 states in the United States of America:

The dominant customary international law standard of statehood is the declarative theory of statehood that defines the state as a person of international law if it “possess the following qualifications: (a) a permanent population; (b) a defined territory; (c) government; and (d) capacity to enter into relations with the other states.” Debate exists on the degree to which recognition should be included as a criterion of statehood. The declarative theory of statehood, an example of which can be found in the Montevideo Convention, argues that statehood is purely objective and recognition of a state by other states is irrelevant. On the other end of the spectrum, the constitutive theory of statehood defines a state as a person under international law only if it is recognized as sovereign by other states. For the purposes of this list, included are all states that either:

  • (a) have declared independence and are often regarded as having control over a permanently populated territory

or

  • (b) are recognised as a sovereign state by at least one other sovereign state

Link–> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sovereign_states

The word-magic here involves the concept that the “state” has “declared independence” and has “control over a permanently populated area”.

This is of course the United States. It, as a central incorporated government, has declared independence that no one dare challenge due to its military might. The once sovereign states now pledged as collateral for this corporation, its debts, and its “good faith and credit” are considered nothing but legal territories of the United States in the legal realm through this contractual and constitutional relationship. The governments of the individual state territories of the United States are still military in nature, each one occupied by the United States’ military and its bases, which under the Libor Code represents military rule.

In other words, the presence of a military base in your State is stated in law to signify military rule under martial law. These bases are not just for your protection, they are for your control. They are the occupying forces of the United States, left over from the same forces that occupied each State during the Civil War. They are the United States corporation’s military – the military of Washington D.C. –  not the American or state militia. They protect the United States from all threats both foreign and domestic, and that includes the people of America and the 50 states. The military ensures the continuity of this 10 mile square municipal corporation and its military rule over the 50 states and other insular possessions. The United States is legally in possession of us!

And each state is governed militarily by a “governor”, whom in Canada is referred to as “Governor General”, and who is the ex officio Commander-in-Chief of the State National Guard of His State unless called in total by the President as (CIC) of the United States. This military position of Governor as commander of a military force is followed by a whole list of military positions…

Lieutenant Governor
Attorney General
Solicitor General
Insurance Commissioner – i.e. military commissions
Superintendents – The commanding officer of the United States Military Academy is its Superintendent.
State Controller
Officers of the court
Police Officers
Employees of Commissions and Authorities

All of these titles represent rule by military force.

OFFICER. He who is lawfully invested with an office.

2. Officers may be classed into, 1. Executive; as the president of the United States of America, the several governors of the different states. Their duties are pointed out in the national constitution, and the constitutions of the several states, but they are required mainly to cause the laws to be executed and obeyed.

3. – 2. The legislative; such as members of congress; and of the several state legislatures. These officers are confined in their duties by the constitution, generally to make laws, though sometimes in cases of impeachment, one of the houses of the legislature exercises judicial functions, somewhat similar to those of a grand jury by presenting to the other articles of impeachment; and the other house acts as a court in trying such impeachments. The legislatures have, besides the power to inquire into the conduct of their members, judge of their elections, and the like.

OFFICE. An office is a right to exercise a public function or employment, and to take the fees and emoluments belonging to it

2. Offices may be classed into civil and military.

TAKE. This is a technical expression which signifies to be entitled to; as, a devisee will take under the will. To take also signifies to seize, as to take and carry away…

CIVIL. This word has various significations. 1. It is used in contradistinction to barbarous or savage, to indicate a state of society reduced to order and regular government; thus we speak of civil life, civil society, civil government, and civil liberty.

2. It is sometimes used in contradistinction to criminal, to indicate the private rights and remedies of men, as members of the community, in contrast to those which are public and relate to the government; thus we speak of civil process and criminal process, civil jurisdiction and criminal jurisdiction.

3. It is also used in contradistinction to military or ecclesiastical, to natural or foreign; thus we speak of a civil station, as opposed to a military or ecclesiastical station; a civil death as opposed to a natural death; a civil war as opposed to a foreign war.

So what does all this mean?

Consider for a moment just what the term “civil war” actually represents. As with the United States Civil War, we find that it was indeed fought to ensure the forced continuity of the United States government. It was not so much a war as it was an invasion. And it was fought to ensure that the people under martial law went along with that government who did not wish to.

To make the contradistinction between the words military and civil is almost a mute point. For a “civil society” under “civil law” cannot be accomplished without force of a military entity – which is the executive branch of government (now the Department Of Defense – as in defense of the realm).

For instance, the U.S. District Courts operate with no authority to actually enforce their decisions. Thus the power of the courts lie in the connection it has to the Executive Branch of that area. This is the true importance of the County Sheriff, for the Sheriff is the Executive power of all the courts within that county. The Sheriff’s Department man’s these courts (bailiffs, etc.), who operate under his authority. Of course, the Sheriff would have little power without the decisions and warrants issued by the courts. In a lawful society this would be referred to as a check and balance, creating a restraint of unreasonable power or influence by either entity. But when unlawful men occupy these offices as persons of the militarized United States under its authority and jurisdiction, the law becomes lawless and the powers of corruption go unchecked.

In essence, this relationship between the judicial and the executive is symbiotic in nature, where alone each office and officer would have no lawful power. But together they become the law, both written and enforced. The cowardly attorney’s in black robes called judges hide behind their pulpits and gavels while the Sheriff hides behind his badge and gun, while each gives authority to the other. Neither takes responsibility for their own actions, because they have been allowed to operate as artificial persons under limited liability incorporation. And they protect each other from legal action as one derives power unjustly from the other.

If lawful men took over either office, refusing to enforce the power and authority of the other, and taking responsibility for their own actions outside of the color of law, the people would have little to fear from their government. But lawful men such as these generally end up dead or imprisoned by the very entity they represent.

On the national level, the President of the United States acts as the Commander In Chief of his executive army, carrying out the legislative and judicial law presented to it. Congress, like the judicial, has no power to enforce its created statutes and codes (judicial opinions for courts) without the enforcement arm of the Executive Branch. A law or decision without force carries no weight, especially from men with no honor.

In other words, the legal system of the United States is solely based on the force and coercion of the executive government to carry out the political laws created by congress. The local and state governments operate under the authority of the United States, for they are just corporations as extensions of that federal government corporation.

Congress created the court system and the Supreme Court, which derives its authority and jurisdiction from that body politic.This is an important fact because this means that the entire system of corporate administrative courts across the country are statutory in nature – created by congress and not the constitution itself, and operating under the authority and jurisdiction of the United States corporation. To put it simply, this means that the courts are operating under private corporate law without lawful authority. That is, unless you consent to that authority as a private corporate person – a member of the United States corporation. Just like the gym example, this private law only applies to members of the United States.

This creation of the court system was done by Congress in the Judiciary Act of 1789:

–=–

The Judiciary Act of 1789

September 24, 1789.

1 Stat. 73.

CHAP. XX. – An Act to establish the Judicial Courts of the United States.

SECTION 1. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the supreme court of the United States shall consist of a chief justice and five associate justices, any four of whom shall be a quorum, and shall hold annually at the seat of government two sessions, the one commencing the first Monday of February, and the other the first Monday of August. That the associate justices shall have precedence according to the date of their commissions, or when the commissions of two or more of them bear date on the same day, according to their respective ages…

Link–> http://www.constitution.org/uslaw/judiciary_1789.htm

–=–

The authority and jurisdiction of these statutory courts only applies to citizens (members) of the United States.

Some people also refer to citizens as “employees” of the Untied States, which is not incorrect. Congressmen (representatives and senators) are also “employees” of the United States corporation, but are officially called “Members”. And we can read above that judges and justices are “commissioned” as employees.

All of these men are acting as artificial persons of the United States, for there is no natural law or natural rights under civil and administrative law because only political law exists there – abeyance by force of contract. This is the very definition of military rule. And every time a citizen does not obey the law, the militarized executive branch steps in to force either compliance, incarceration, or death.

Murder is unlawful and illegal, but government gives license to commit this illegal act – a license to kill. It is interesting to note that government only acknowledges the “civil death” of a person, not the bloody and violent taking of the life of a man.

CIVIL DEATH, persons. The change of the state of a person who is declared civilly dead by judgment of a competent tribunal. In such case, the person against whom such sentence is pronounced is considered dead.

It is interesting to note here that just as a living or natural man cannot have a civil death but only a natural one, the word “perish” does not apply to persons, as artificial persons never existed as a living things but only as contractual things in legal code:

TO PERISH. To come to an end; to cease to be; to die.

2. What has never existed cannot be said to have perished

You see, an artificial person (corporation) never actually exists in nature, so it cannot have a natural death.

So it is perhaps the best definition of civil law for me to say that:

Civil law is the state of non-necessity of martial law while under military rule, because the governed are not acting in civil disobedience.

Martial law is the physical manifestation of force and violence via government decree to ensure the continuity of military rule that is visible and obvious (violent) to all people.

And military rule is simply the current state of a system of de facto United States corporate law based on coercion, force, and occasional violence, which is sugar-coated and masked under the appearance of civility and under the guise of “civil law”.

Civil law and military rule, therefore, are all but indistinguishable. They are both systems of law enacted by forced compliance of the Executive Branch of government. In both systems, the laws they tout are ensured by force. And in both instances, a man’s natural rights are struck down in lieu of positive or political rights.

It is ironic and disturbing then to point out the now obvious paradox of a subjected people in an occupied land…

For it would only be through open revolt and total disobedience of the current laws of the United States central government that the above facts could manifest themselves as self evident. This axiom of military rule is invisible to the civil servants and citizens of government, no differently than the subjects of a king might never consider that they are at all times under military rule – the rule by force of a tyrant – no matter how fair or just that king seems to be.

This kingdom called the United States – the District that reigns the lands of America through contractual membership under force of its own law despite being a foreign corporate entity outside of those lands – holds the reigns to millions of soldiers; obedient Americans conscripted by their own enemy through contract as security guards for the United States. And these soldiers, in their belief that they are fighting for America, will no doubt blindly follow this United States corporation into oblivion no differently than did those useful fools that killed father, brother, and child in that great United States Civil War – “The War Of Northern Aggression“.

Perhaps a more fitting title to that Civil War and to all wars proceeding it would read: “The Unending War Of Continued United States Aggression, Both Foreign and Domestic“.

Now you might think that Congress is there to redress grievances of the people to the United States government as representatives thereof. But oh what a tangled web they weave…

Congressmen are “employees” of the United States government, according to TITLE 5 of U.S. CODE.

So this would be like expecting a mid-level management employee of Walmart to change the policies of Walmart’s CEO and board of directors. Employees have no individual say on what happens in the United States corporation. So a single representative is worthless without the agreement of the vast majority of the entire body of representatives.

And of course the people represented in these congressional districts never seem to realize that the business affairs of Congress only happen inside of Washington D.C. – in other words outside of their State. Just as employees of Walmart have no authority outside of the corporate jurisdiction of Walmart, neither do the congressmen and Senators have power in the 50 individual States as republics. They are the Representatives of the Federal Government to the people, not the representatives of the people to the Federal Government. They conduct only Federal business in the jurisdiction of the United States, even while doing so in the States they hold domicile. They are United States Employees, not State Employees. In fact, they have absolutely no power within the State government, except those imposed by force by the Federal Central government as a whole.

So why do the people contractually volunteer to give up their power to a bunch of known-to-be-corrupt representatives as employees of the very entity that enslaves them, instead of leaving this horrific militarized club called the United States by withdrawing legal membership?

Perhaps it is the misconception that our membership (citizenship) is not a choice.

But wait a minute, you say. Isn’t it my “constitutional right” to be a citizen?

That’s an interesting question, actually. In fact, the concept of “citizenship” as it stands today was not part of the original constitution. Citizenship was created after the “country” was placed under military rule (martial law) under the Libor Code and General Orders 100. It was in this reconstruction period after the “Civil War” that was created reconstruction amendment #14.

The 14th Amendment states:

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside…”

Whereas before this amendment was ratified by the now unlawful military congress the concept of citizenship was based on the blood of the man in question in a natural sense, the United States now took on a corporate disposition and changed the presumption of citizenship into a legally binding contractual duty; where all people became artificial persons as individual corporate bodies politic within the United States’ web of corporatism.

The most overlooked word in this amendment to the constitution is the word “subject”:

SUBJECT, contracts. The thing which is the object of an agreement. This term is used in the laws of Scotland.

SUBJECT, persons, government. An individual member of a nation, who is subject to the laws; this term is used in contradistinction to citizen, which is applied to the same individual when considering his political rights.

2. In monarchical governments, by subject is meant one who owes permanent allegiance to the monarch. Vide Body politic

NATIONALITY. The state of a person in relation to the nation in which he was born.

2. A man retains his nationality of origin during his minority, but, as in the case of his domicil of origin, he may change his nationality upon attaining full age; he cannot, however, renounce his allegiance without permission of the government. See Citizen; Domicile; Expatriation; Naturalization…

NATIONS. Nations or states are independent bodies politic; societies of men united together for the purpose of promoting their mutual safety and advantage by the joint efforts of their combined strength.

2. But every combination of men who govern themselves, independently of all others, will not be considered a nation; a body of pirates, for example, who govern themselves, are not a nation. To constitute a nation another ingredient is required. The body thus formed must respect other nations in general, and each of their members in particular. Such a society has her affairs and her interests; she deliberates and takes resolutions in common; thus becoming a moral person who possesses an understanding and will peculiar to herself, and is susceptible of obligations and rights…

3. It belongs to the government to declare whether they will consider a colony which has thrown off the yoke of the mother country as an independent state; and until the government have decided on the question, courts of justice are bound to consider the ancient state of things as remaining unchanged.

In the Civil War, it would be a foregone conclusion to state that the United States did not accept (as it was lawfully required to do via its own charter) the secession of the confederate states – the yolks that threw themselves from the mother country. Instead, it acted unlawfully by all standards of ethics and natural law – a military conquest being the result – forcing the confederate states to be captured as prisoners of war and to accept the new reorganized United States and its new corporate constitution as their new sovereign tyrant.

COUNTRY. By country is meant the state of which one is a member.

2. Every man’s country is in general the state in which he happens to have been born, though there are some exceptions. See Domicil; Inhabitant. But a man has the natural right to expatriate himself, i. e. to abandon his country, or his right of citizenship acquired by means of naturalization in any country in which he may have taken up his residence. See Allegiance; Citizen; Expatriation…

Remember, the United Nations refers to the United States as a state that is a member of the U.N, just as the United States refers to its own 50 States that are supposedly independent but members of that body.

But more importantly one must understand the distinction made here of being “born in the country of the United States”.

Though a man may be born in the State of Georgia, his residence is created within the jurisdiction of the United States – that incorporated legal boundry that extends across the entirety of the territories called “states” and beyond. In essence, when a man is born in the United States, it is his artificial person that is civilly born, creating a citizen.

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside…”

Again, this very important distinction must be made…

Though you physically are born in and reside within a State, the artificial representation of you called a legal “person” and a “citizen” is civilly born in and resides within the jurisdiction of the United States. Registered persons/citizens who vote are actually voting in the artificial representation of Washington D.C. – the jurisdiction that extends from that central district 10 miles square over the entire “country” through contract. Your home is a registered United States home. Your vehicle is a registered United States vehicle. Your children are registered United States persons. And all of these contractual agreements can be utilized to take these things away from citizens. In fact, it is the political and constitutional right of all citizens to have their registered property of the United States taken away from them. Just read the 5th Amendment very carefully… for it tells you clearly that through the United States court system under what it calls “due process”, you life, liberty, and property can be taken from you (see definition of take above).

In this way, it is correct to say that for the most part, the actual individual states are empty – abandoned by all the people who became residents of the United States in Washington D.C. – for the people all reside in the United States, and the States are territories of the United States. The people walk as persons upon the plastic coating of United States jurisdiction, never touching the natural land. Of course the illusion of States rights still exists among the citizens of the United States, who have no idea they are under the military rule of this foreign corporation, and who do not comprehend the true nature of the word person or citizen.

In the United States corporation…

Citizenship is granted, not taken;

Citizenship is legal and political, not lawful and natural;

Citizenship is contractual, not moral;

Citizenship is a voluntary membership, not a mandatory requirement.

Citizenship is artificial and un-American!!!

Perhaps the natural born citizens of the United States should be asking themselves why this so-called privilege and natural right of citizenship is being tossed to the wind and bestowed to those who did not naturally and traditionally gain it? The fact that citizenship can be contractually bestowed upon anyone who is contractually willing to receive or pay for all of the benefits and tyranny that accompanies such a legal status should be enough for anyone to realize that its conveyance has nothing to do with anything but a contractual tie to the military rule of government. This once honorable title of men is now just a corporate slogan to sell monopolized, for-profit government products and services to ignorant persons at non-competative prices.

Take the influx of what we call “illegal immigrants” as a clue as to how America became a militarized corporate slave machine:

The Pew Hispanic Center determined that according to an analysis of Census Bureau data about 8 percent of children born in the United States in 2008 — about 340,000 — were offspring of unauthorized immigrants. In total, about four million American-born children of unauthorized immigrant parents resided in this country in 2009, along with about 1.1 million foreign-born children of unauthorized immigrant parents. The Center for Immigration Studies – a think tank which favors stricter controls on immigration—claims that between 300,000 and 400,000 children are born each year to illegal immigrants in the U.S.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sovereign_states

These are “natural born” children (citizens) just like you according to your representatives in government, for citizens are no longer required to have honor to join the “country”. And soon over 11 million non-natural born invading immigrants will join the party when the United States says it’s just alright.

Citizenship means nothing to an honorable man. It is just a ticket to ride on the slave-ship. It is the act of selling ones soul to acquire artificial things. And it has become a pour substitute for a once-cherished thing. Most importantly, it does not make you an American, just a useful pawn in a collective extortion racket designed to create corporate authority by making all the people into one collective tool to extract their individual power and intent as one lone consenting voice for the actions of an unlawful corporation. And every unlawful action by government is based on the informed consent it presumes from its members.

Isn’t it time to rebut that presumption of consent and take back our individual voices and power as individual men?

So let’s say that you are a member of an exclusive golf club that only allows people just like you to enter. You retain a membership to this club because you wish to be a part of something special and be around like-minded individuals who contribute and benefit from this club and its rules and regulations, as well as its exclusivity and respect. And you stay a member because this club operates legitimately and lawfully with full respect to nature and to all involved.

But then let’s say that your club is taken over and its rules for membership changed.

Suddenly, this club is full of men, women and children (persons) who are not like-minded in any way and who do not respect in any way your methods, opinions, lifestyle, morals, ethics, values, and so on. And then the club management passes rules and regulations that require you to integrate, hire as employees, and tolerate all of these new members – lest you be fined and imprisoned for discrimination and your corporation terminated and its assets seized by government. (Note: This is what E-Verify does.)

Would not the proper response be to immediately end your membership with that club and either find a more lawful club or start your own exclusive one?

The club only seeks to collect more and more revenue and fees from these new members, in order to both generate more revenue and to control more and more of the population by forcing its registration of all things and children. So why would anyone stay as a member of that club only to be forced to tolerate a cultural invasion and complete change in the standards of that club? Why would you continue to financially support that club’s central governing body when everything it does goes against your ideals and values?

So why do you continue to stay a member of the United States club?

It’s not a requirement! It’s not necessary for you to work and live in America and in a State. This beast’s Social Security number is not needed for anything at all. And it certainly isn’t helping you to stay a member, unless you consider tyranny, unjust taxation without representation, pain, punishment, and extortion your political right like government does.

We complain, we scream, we weep, and we suffer. And all because we believe that we must stay members of this corporation that continuously harms us. We accept the mark and the number of this beast because we believe it is for the greater good. We support its illegal wars and pay for them with our voluntary taxes. It doesn’t listen or care about us as anything but commodities, because a corporation only cares about growth (expansion) and profits. It sells our labor and bonds our incarceration. It takes all and gives nothing.

So why are you still a citizen of this 10 mile square corporation that seeks to control every aspect of your life through your voluntary contractual obligation? Isn’t it time to pull the plug and stop financially supporting its exaction tactics to extort your money and estate?

Isn’t it time to take back your registered United States property and place it back into your personal possession, including your children?

Or are a few non-guaranteed benefits at the expense of future generations (your children and theirs) more important than being free?

Do you really think it would be un-American to withdraw your membership to this corporation that isn’t even part of America?

Since the concept of being an American seems to have been blurred between the natural and the contractual, perhaps we should end here with a quote from the most American thing I can think of…

“When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.

That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security…”

–Declaration of Independence

.

–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Saturday, May 18th, 2013

 

All legal definitions taken from Bouvier’s Law Dictioanry, 1856:

Tyranny Requires Equality


Question: What is required for a set of uniform codes and regulations to apply to all the persons of the United States?

Answer: Uniformity of legal equality under the law. In other words, equal rights.

It is an ultra-common misconception amongst the subjected people of the United States in their thought that “rights” are always a good thing, and that “rights” are always somehow a protection against the erosion and encroachment of government and corporations (persons) into the people’s personal liberties. To be even more clear, the general thought is that rights are always in place to prevent things like crime, extortion, tyranny, foreclosure, unlawful searches and seizures, incarceration, and so on from happening to the people.

For instance, one might arrogantly say that they have the right to a “fair trial”. And yet not once does the consideration dawn upon men of good conscious that the trial itself is literally forced upon them by government. Thus, the “right” to a “fair” or “speedy” trial is in actuality a direct consequence of an oppressive government in the first place. In other words, the fact that the trial is forced upon a person is the actual “right”, and the ability to receive the qualities of “fair” and “speedy” in that trial are not the root of that right. In this way, we begin to understand that rights are not voluntary at all, and these governmental rights are indeed forced upon the people. The government sells this tyranny to the people by baiting us like snake oil salesman with positive sounding diatribe such as fair and speedy. This is like me offering you (forcing upon you) my services to get hit with a hammer upon your head, but the impact will be “quick” and “painless”. Your right, you see, is to get hit upon the head with a hammer, with the beneficial service of the impact of that hammer being quick and painless.

Or you might believe in the “right” to free speech and the ability to freely assemble. Yet hate speech laws proclaim your speech must be nice and politically correct. Some cities require you to get a permit for free speech and to protest or assemble peacefully – but only in small, roped off , designated areas. The police even tell you that “anything you say may be used against you” when they read you your “rights”. But how can this be your right? If you don’t have a choice about these rights, are they really rights?

The real question you must ask is: Can a right be violently forced upon you?

Today we are going to be talking about a concept that is very difficult to understand. In legal code, we find what is called positive law. But we often forget that where there is a positive there is usually also a negative – an opposite and equal reaction, if you will. Positive law and “positive rights” are put into place in purposeful and direct violation or opposition to natural law and “negative rights”. A right is either positive or negative, and never-ever in between. Positive laws are laws assigning temporary and are revokable governmental rights placed upon legal persons, which usually create a direct violation of a man’s natural rights under God – the natural laws outside of governmental code.

The difference between these two types of law or “rights” is paramount to understand.

The problem is that all legal codes are positive, including the very misunderstood U.S. constitution itself.

Let’s use as an example the constitutional (positive) right known as the “freedom of religion”. This is one of the most deceptive phrases in legal code (positive law) that I can imagine. For in order to comprehend what it is to have the “freedom of religion,” we must first have a legal definition of these two legal words. All terms and phrases in the legal language have very specific meanings, and are often quite opposite to what we generally think of as conversational words – the words generally defined in an English general language dictionary. The word “freedom” is perhaps the best example of a legal word used to fool the unwitting public. We must realize that there is a very good reason why the legal dictionary is completely separate from the regular English dictionary, and why general dictionary definitions specifically tell you when referring to the same legal definitions within. English and Legal are two completely different languages, no different than English and Chinese. And every word in government must be a legal one, for government only deals in the legal construct, in the legal language.

Would it surprise you to learn that government is acting constitutionally when it requires you to get a permit for exercising “free speech”? To understand why this is so, we must define the legal terms involved, and you must stop thinking of the constitution as anything other than a legal language document.

So what is “freedom”, and what is “speech”?

The 1st Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

First, let’s get it into our heads what the word “freedom” means as used in this legal constitution.

While the natural or negative right to free participation in any religion is unalienable, the governmental or positive constitutional right to freedom of religion or freedom of speech is most certainly alienable. To understand this, we must understand the legal meaning of this legal term called freedom. In the Merriam Webster or any other normal English dictionary, you will see that the word freedom is defined in two distinctly different ways. Let’s take a look…

FREEDOM:

(1) The quality or state of being free: as

(a) the absence of necessity, coercion, or constraint in choice or action

(b) liberation from slavery or restraint or from the power of another: independence

(c) the quality or state of being exempt or released usually from something onerous <freedom from care>

(h) unrestricted use <gave him the freedom of their home>

FREEDOM:

(2)   (a) A political right

(b) franchise, privilege

(Source: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/freedom)

And so we can see here that there are without a doubt two distinctly different definitions of the word freedom, and that the legal definition is indeed a political or “positive” right.

The truth about freedom is this…

There is but one freedom under government rule enjoyed by citizens (subjects): freedom is the revokable political positive right (privilege) to be free to act as you will as long as you obey the laws of government. This is not the state of actually being free in an unrestricted way to do what you please while being responsible for your actions, but rather a literal legal enslavement to government law to act under government rule. It is a truism to state that free men must have responsibility for their own actions, lest government become the master and punisher of those who are its servants (subjects). United States citizens are not free men, but instead they live within invisible legal chains called “freedom”.

The right to bear arms as a natural/negative right must go unchallenged by government by its very nature of being a negative right – the natural right of non-interference. But the positive governmental rights which are assigned to citizens to carry legalfire-arms” is certainly being challenged in government right now – as we speak. The trick with government you see, in order for its tyranny to prevail, is to make all its equal people as citizens accept positive rights by government so that the people turn their backs on their natural, God-given, negative, unalienable rights the rights of men against government intrusion into those rights. Indeed, government actually requires a lien on all people’s natural/negative rights for them to enjoy citizenship within the United States under government’s strictly positive law, for we must remember that negative rights cancel out positive rights. So government must find legal ways to circumvent the peoples liberties (negative rights) and assign restrict-able political (positive) rights. Government does this via the contractual relationship offered to the people called “citizenship”, which carries with it the contractual benefit of positive rights, often called “civil rights” and/or “constitutional rights”. While it calls these liberties, they are far from it…

–=–

The Laws Of Attraction

–=–

So that we do not get confused here, let’s see just how one form of “right” is cancelled out by the other form. The job of an attorney as an “officer of the court” is to keep you within the legal language, so that the court never has to talk in plain English. The legal language of the law society within government is meant to keep you always in the artificial person-hood of your citizenship – never speaking the language of mankind. The following list shows the difference between the laws of man (natural) and the laws of government (legal):

Negative ……………………………………………………… Positive

Man …………………………………………………………….. Person

Free …………………………………………………………. Freedom

Free Man ………………………………………………………. Citizen

Natural ………………………………………………………. Political

Liberty ………………………………………………….. Entitlement

God-given ………………… Man-made (government granted)

Right (natural) …………………………… Privilege (revokable)

Right (natural) ……………………….. Duty (moral obligation)

Duty (responsibility, trust)…………. Contractual obligation

Responsibility ……………… Limited liability (incorporated)

Unalienable (inherent) ………… Alienable (not permanent)

De Jure ……………………………………………………… De Facto

Lawful …………………………………………………… Color of law

The words unalienable and inherent can be defined as essential and intrinsic . These words apply to ideals rather than to actual living beings. While life itself is not unalienable in any way (as is apparent throughout all of nature and its food-chain) the idea that life is an unalienable right is a negative concept in that it refers to the negative right of men to not be subject to the will of other men. This is the moral obligation of honor and duty that men should not kill other men… or as it is more commonly known: “Thou Shall Not Kill”.

On the contrary, cows, pigs, and chickens live under the positive rights granted by ranchers and farmers, in that they are subjects of that farm and its positive laws. These animal’s natural rights are only valid in as much as the farmer or rancher grants the same positive right to mirror their natural/negative rights. But when slaughter-season comes around and the market-price for bacon goes up, the cows, pigs, and chickens learn real quick that any rights they may perceive as livestock (citizens) of that farm are certainly alienable and in no way inherent or permanent. The cows only eat because the government (farmer) feeds them hey – thus the cows believe it is their natural right to have food brought to them every day by the farmer. But the farmer is only acting under his own positive law, and in reality the cows have no natural rights. But they still believe… The chickens may only have children (chicks) if the government (farmer) allows the hens to keep their eggs and hatch them. Parenthood is a legal term under contract with the state (farm). But the farmer, under the positive law of his farm (his rules), overpowers the natural rights of the chickens and allows those unborn children of the chickens to be collected for sale to others.

The only difference between the cows, pigs, and chickens and that of the humans within the United States farm is that the humans contractually volunteer and agree to be livestock under positive rights and laws, whereas these animals never had a choice.

And people think animals are dumb?

The difficult aspect here is to make people understand that as citizens they are not free, but are also livestock under the United States farm which grants the alienable privilege of “freedom”. Breaking through the “it’s a free country” paradox and fallacy of the American people seems to be the biggest challenge of our modern life and times.

Perhaps the most difficult of these opposite terms is the way in which a right creates an opposite duty. The individual natural right of “liberty” creates an opposite natural duty for all other individuals to respect the right of each others’ individual liberties. It would be the duty, for instance, for the people to use arms against government for violating their natural negative rights, no differently than if it was just a neighbor. For a natural right is something to be cherished and protected to the death. And it is a man’s duty to protect his own rights and that of others. It is a man’s duty to not interfere or trespass upon others rights – the duty to protect each others’ negative rights.

But when government offers political rights to citizens (artificial persons), the moral duty changes into a contractual obligation under legal law. The obligation of legal duty is no longer a choice, but rather a forced positive right – a right that forces you to conduct yourself in an activity that may be against your own interests or those of other individuals’ interests. The negative right requires only the opposite negative duty – a moral obligation to do no harm to others or yourself and to defend your negative rights with your life if necessary. But the contractual relationship of citizenship stifles negative rights (the right to not have your own rights trampled) so that positive rights are agreed to by the persons under contract. In other words, citizens agree to abandon their natural (negative) rights and accept under contract with government or corporations a replacement to their natural rights with the political (positive) rights offered by government, and accepted through contract by citizens. Thus, while in the natural realm government has no power over a man. But in the political realm government has total control over the person/citizen. For a positive law to be acceptable to natural men, that positive law must not be in violation of any negative right.

Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856, defines a the word Duty:

DUTY, natural law. A human action which is, exactly conformable to the laws which require us to obey them. 2. It differs from a legal obligation, because a duty cannot always be enforced by the law; it is our duty, for example, to be temperate in eating, but we are under no legal obligation to be so; we ought to love our neighbors, but no law obliges us to love them. 3. Duties may be considered in the relation of man towards God, towards himself, and towards mankind… 4. A man has a duty to perform towards himself; he is bound by the law of nature to protect his life and his limbs; it is his duty, too, to avoid all intemperance in eating and drinking, and in the unlawful gratification of all his other appetites. 5. He has duties to perform towards others. He is bound to do to others the same justice which he would have a right to expect them to do to him.

To live under natural law is to follow the laws of non-interference, responsibility of ones own actions, and honor to fulfill one’s moral obligations under promise and private contract.

On the contrary, the magnetic opposite of this natural law called duty is offered by government through contract, as a political or positive right:

DUTIES. In its most enlarged sense, this word is nearly equivalent to taxes, embracing all impositions or charges levied on persons or things; in its more restrained sense, it is often used as equivalent to customs, (q. v.) or imposts. (q. v.) Vide, for the rate of duties payable on goods and merchandise…

When the services of government are forced upon the people, the people must pay duties (taxes) on those services whether they enjoy or require those services or not. The right to pay taxes is a positive right, and the right to be punished for not paying those taxes is also a positive right. Punishment is an artificial duty created upon the positive right to be taxed – extortion being the right granted by government to persons. You, as a citizen/person, have the positive right to be taxed without the negative right to say no. The imprisonment you may enjoy as punishment for not paying mandatory taxes is also your positive right and duty. And most importantly, the right to pay more and more taxes on more and more things and accept more and more government services with more and more duties, as well as the right to allow government to raise those taxes at its own whim, is also your positive right.

Again, a right is not voluntary in the positive legal realm. So unfortunately, tyranny through extortion is certainly your right if government says it is so, and creates the positive law declaring it as such.

Positive law is involuntary service at the barrel of a gun…

It is perhaps easiest to comprehend these two completely opposite kinds of “rights” by using an analogy of magnets. Most people have played with magnets in their lifetime, attempting to push together two equal magnets that are opposed to each other in their polarities. A positive and a negative are diametrically opposed to each other. The harder we push those magnets together, the harder it becomes to push them, until the negative magnet throws off the positive magnet with a protective shield. And so the only way to make those magnets stick to each other is to turn one magnet around so that the polarities are equal, allowing them to join together. When speaking of God’s law and natural rights (negative rights), our opposing magnet in this case is government code and legality (positive rights). In essence, we must turn our back on law and our natural rights in order to function within government and its legal law and codes. The natural law is magnetically opposed to the positive (legal) law, just as negative rights are magnetically opposed to positive rights.

The first thing to consider whenever attempting to discern the legal language is to remember that emotion must be left out of the equation; that morals and ethics happen in men, not in legal codes. The legal language is just words, with a specific meaning, and with no humanity or consideration of morals or ethics. A contract, for instance, is just an agreement as written in this legal language. It has no moral obligations in an of itself to do anything, but instead establishes the specific positive rights and counterpart duties that will be followed. The moral and ethical parts of the fulfillment of that contract happen outside of the contract, in the hearts, minds, and actions of the men who signed that contract. The contract itself is a bridge between the moral realm and the legal realm, allowing what would otherwise be a natural duty to become an enforceable positive right. For instance, the right to be paid in exchange for an already delivered service or thing as agreed to within a private contract is a positive right, enforceable by law if one party to that contract doesn’t fulfill. Multiply this by 1 million and you have a government contract with men to be citizens, and in exchange the men as citizens must accept the services of government’s legal codes as a forced legal duty to accept. This is also positive law, the difference being that the former contract between men is done in good faith, where no legal recourse is needed, while the contract of citizenship is done without understanding, intention, comprehension, or good faith. A contract steeped in fraud is not enforceable by law, unless the law has been replaced by the positive laws created by government that allow that fraud to be law. This is government.

Just remember that rights are a double-edged sword, which can be positive or negative. In defining what this means, the term positive should not be misconstrued to mean good, no more than the word negative should be misunderstood as a bad thing. They are legal terms, and so attaching an emotional meaning to these words will only lead to confusion.

–=–

Equality – Ladies Acting As Men

–=–

A woman reading this may have an emotional response and espouse that women may sign contracts too, so why only mention “men” here? The confusing answer to this question is that in law, women are men. This is not my opinion, it is just legal law. All people are part of mankind, regardless of sex.  The legal language sees no sex and feels no emotion or obligation to appease the feminist or male perspective, unless specifically written into that code as an artificial construct. The word “men” simply refers to the species man, regardless of color, race, creed, or sex. In this way, the basic legal language itself is a higher language, not weighted down with petty intricacies and debates about whether women and men are equal, or whether all men are created equal. In actuality, the legal language has no ability in and of itself to make such a discernment, and is only concerned with defining the artificiality of mankind as “persons”. It is just a tool. Thus it does not recognize sex unless it is specifically told to, and then does so only in terms of a legal “status”. Legal code cannot be prejudiced, for it has no emotion or predisposition. A natural (real female) woman has equal rights with a natural man only if that natural woman has the legal status assigned to her as a legal fictional man called a legal “woman”. The legal term “Woman” is a status, not a natural state of a living being – not a living man (mankind). For legal does not recognize a natural living man or woman, only the artificial persons of these living people – which have no sex unless specifically defined that way in the code for legal separation purposes (rape, etc.). But this is no different legally than separating different species of ants for research and classification. There is no realization of feminism or masculinity in legal code, because a piece of paper has not the ability to make such distinctions or realizations. Paper has no emotions, any more than the legal words written on that paper. And so any sexual or other emotional or physical distinction between these two artificial persons is solely a construct of science and legal status, no different than distinguishing between garbage and recyclables. To the legal language, garbage and recyclables are the same thing – trash. Only when the legal codes are changed to recognize a certain type of trash as recyclable will a legal status be created allowing certain rights, restrictions, and benefits to be placed upon certain trash legally defined as “recyclables”. Though all garbage is created equal, certain garbage has a status. But that status can only be granted if all trash is first made equal under the legal law. Similarly, women have equal rights with men in law only because they take upon themselves the artificial person-hood status called “woman”, creating this status in positive law which states that persons shall be equally protected and punished under the law and shall have equal rights under the legal law known as “positive rights” but called “Equal Protection Under The Law”.

The reality for women is that their legal status is detrimental to their natural rights as men (mankind), and they become whatever the legal codes say they are as artificial constructs. Equal rights for “women” in law makes them no better or no worse than men, but instead makes them “equal” – removing any sexual differences unless specifically enumerated within that code and how it applies to that particular status of “woman” in opposite to men. Once this equality is established, then special positive rights can be assigned to the legal status of “women”. Thus, a “woman” can have unequal rights giving them special privileges over their supposed equal citizens of the male persuasion. The same goes for “African American” or other ethnicity’s – who are given a special status of “minority”, which then allows them to claim certain positive rights which trample all other citizen’s natural rights or lesser positive rights. In this way, it is the lesser status citizens who have inequality forced upon them, of which it is their contractual duty to accept that positive right and give up their right to sue for what would otherwise be blatant discrimination based on race. Affirmative Action is an example of this. Protected rights of a certain status of citizens requires unfair and unequal treatment of all other citizens. Equality steals away the individualism of a human (regardless of sex, color, race, etc.) and makes everyone not special in any way. It peals away the sex, the color, the race, the religion, and the humanity of each individual living man and woman and places them all in one giant legal blender – a melting pot of unwarranted equality. The end result of this multicultural duel-sexed cornucopia of persons is called legal “U.S. citizens”, whom in the end are in no way equal under law due to the assigned legal status’ called entitlements. If one person is entitled to a positive right that other persons are not entitled to, then the negative right of liberty does not exist in that legal system.

This is not to say that the legal language doesn’t neutrally define these unique traits of mankind in a scientific and unemotional way, it is just to say that it treats them no different than any other legal concept (like the trash example), and its basis is not founded on anything but simply defining these terms without the hindrance of human emotional traits. In short, the legal language only deals with artificiality in the form of corporations, contracts, and persons (i.e. citizens). These citizens are artificial things, not living people. Thus, when defining legality, emotion and humanity really has no place, race becomes a legal weapon, and equality exists only when considering positive rights and punishment for not obeying the forced contractual obligation of legal codes.

Back in 1856, this was the definition of “Sex” in Bouvier’s and other dictionaries, which shows that “women” is a status:

SEX. The physical difference between male and female in animals. 2. In the human species (of animals) the male is called man, (q. v.) and the female, woman. (q. v.) Some human beings whose sexual organs are somewhat imperfect, have acquired the name of hermaphrodite. (q. v.) 3. In the civil state the sex creates a difference among individuals. Women cannot generally be elected or appointed to offices or service in public capa-cities. In this our law agrees with that of other nations. The civil law excluded women from all offices civil or public: Faemintae ab omnibus officiis civilibus vel publicis remotae sunt. Dig. 50, 17, 2. The principal reason of this exclusion is to encourage that modesty which is natural to the female sex, and which renders them unqualified to mix and contend with men; the pretended weakness of the sex is not probably the true reason. Poth. Des Personnes, tit. Vide Gender; Male; Man; Women; Worthiest of blood.

A mature and thinking natural female human should be able to see that though this legal definition has changed over the years, the status is still the same. Legal persons called “women” have now been made to have equal status with legal persons called “men”. This is to say that the equality established in the legal code is completely artificial with respect to the hearts and minds of men. And though this status seems to benefit the female sex of mankind, you as a woman must remember that government defines you first as an “animal” here, and then assigns you a special status of woman-human-animal. So while you may certainly enjoy the positive rights bestowed upon you as “wo-man”, you must accept these positive rights with the knowledge that they create inequality among all natural men. In other words, equality in law is not true natural equality, but is an artificial status granted by a corrupt government that by definition tramples the negative rights of half of the population (male-human-animals). You, as a female of the species human, will only ever know true natural equality when men are not forced by law to treat you as such by positive law. As it is in legal code, men are forced to accept your legal equality, which in the end creates a resentment between sexes in the natural realm. This goes for creed, race, sex, and any other status that is “protected”. And in this way, citizens are forced to accept the most deviant and sinister of persons as equal, even when those persons act completely against the morals and values of others’ negative rights, and even as organizations of these persons legally extort from others. These persons are equal under punishment of legal law. Ironically, the struggle for equal rights for women, slaves, blacks, homosexuals, and other minority groups necessarily requires the unequal state of equality and status for certain individuals, but in no way creates equality among mankind.

If you are emotionally angry right now, then you are speaking a different language than the legal one, and your emotions are getting in the way of understanding your own enslavement.

As a woman, you are a legal fiction.

As a man, you are a beautiful creature of emotion, love, and flesh and blood.

Here is how these legal terms are defined in Bouvier’s Law Dict, 1856:

MAN. A human being. This definition includes not only the adult male sex of the human species, but women and children… 2. In a more confined sense, man means a person of the male sex; and sometimes it signifies a male of the human species above the age of puberty. Vide Rape. It was considered in the civil or Roman law, that although man and person are synonymous in grammar, they had a different acceptation in law; all persons were men, but all men, for example, slaves, were not persons, but things.

–=–

MANKIND. Persons of the male sex; but in a more general sense, it includes persons of both sexes; for example, the statute of 25 Hen. VIII., c. 6, makes it felony to commit, sodomy with mankind or beast. Females as well as males are included under the term mankind. See Gender.

–=–

GENDER. That which designates the sexes. 2. As a general rule, when the masculine is used it includes the feminine, as, man sometimes includes women. This is the general rule, unless a contrary intention appears. But in penal statutes, which must be construed strictly, when the masculine is used and not the feminine, the latter is not in general included… 3. Pothier says that the masculine often includes the feminine, but the feminine never includes the masculine; that according to this rule if a man were to bequeath to another all his horses, his mares would pass by the legacy; but if he were to give all his mares, the horses would not be included.

–=–

WOMEN, persons. In its most enlarged sense, this word signifies all the females of the human species; but in a more restricted sense, it means all such females who have arrived at the age of puberty. 2. Women are either single or married. 1. Single or unmarried women have all the civil rights of men; they may therefore enter into contracts or engagements; sue and be sued; be trustees or guardians, they may be witnesses, and may for that purpose attest all papers; but they are generally, not possessed of any political power; hence they cannot be elected representatives of the people, nor be appointed to the offices of judge, attorney at law, sheriff, constable, or any other office, unless expressly authorized by law; instances occur of their being appointed post-mistresses nor can they vote at any election. 3. The existence of a married woman being merged, by a fiction of law, in the being of her husband, she is rendered incapable, during the coverture, of entering into any contract, or of suing or being sued, except she be joined with her husband; and she labors under all the incapacities above mentioned, to which single women are subject.

In the modern definition, Webster’s English Dictionary defines the word woman not as a natural being, but as an artificial person. Most people will not realize what is being defined here:

WOMAN-

a : an adult female person
b : a woman (person) belonging to a particular category (as by birth, residence, membership, or occupation) —usually used in combination <councilwoman>

In the legal language, the term woman is never used in legal code to describe the natural state of a female, but only to issue a legal status.

However, the word female is used:

FEMALE. This term denotes the sex which bears young. 2. It is a general rule, that the young of female animals which belong to us, are ours, nam fetus ventrem sequitur. The rule is, in general, the same with regard to slaves; but when a female slave comes into a free state, even without the consent of her master, and is there delivered of a child, the latter is free.

If right now, while claiming to be a “woman”, you wish to call me sexist, a chauvinist, racist, or other false paradigm, you could be no further from the truth than I can possibly imagine – and you need to reread this section. In fact, I may be one of the few men in existence who actually recognize your natural/negative equality without the threat or need of being punished by the positive legal system if I don’t!!!

For those who can separate the legal and English languages with logic and reason, we can move on…

–=–

Love And Marriage

–=–

Love and hate are not considered in this legal language when speaking of the contract of legal marriage. Marriage is nothing but a contractual state of being between (as persons) the man, the woman, and the State. It is paper with legal words written on it, and signed by all parties involved. It has no emotion, ethics, morals, values, etc.

Children produced by this marriage contract are not treated as living breathing humans, because the legal language does not deal with living breathing humans. Rather, it treats children as artificial things that are State property – things which are disputed due to the avoidance or negation of a contract by the artificial persons contracted in that legal marriage. Children are no less fictitious persons than the persons who birthed them, when considering the legal nature of human animals.

Again, judging or discussing the legal language with emotion is foolish, since it has no emotion when it defines you. It does not understand love any more than that for which it may necessarily define love as a legal concept. Like an android, the legal language may sometimes simulate the emotions of living man, but will never actually feel them. And like an android with its humanoid appearing synthetic skin and outer shell, our own artificial persons may appear to be living men and women; but are in fact made up of nothing but the wires and circuitry of this legal language.

Love and marriage are distinctly different concepts. One is an emotion and one is a legal arrangement through contract. Love is for the most part incredibly outside of our control while marriage is a legal set of rules and regulations defining a state of contract controlled by government. Love is not in any way dependent upon the contract of marriage, nor is love required in a contract of marriage – for the legal language knows not love! But this does not mean that attempts by modern society, religions, and the courts have not presupposed the conjoining of these two concepts. But love is an emotion, and marriage is a thing (a signed paper contract). But most importantly, love is not controllable by law while marriage is.

Therefore love is a negative right whereas marriage is a positive right.

Love has no limits, whereas marriage is nothing but limits.

So now we may begin to personally see and feel the difference between positive and negative rights – like feeling the difference between heat and cold. When it comes to love, it is safe to say that our natural or God-given right is that we should be able to love any man or woman we choose, and that in fact it is not even a controllable choice – as love is an emotional feeling that, as most of us have certainly felt, is way outside of our emotional control. So love is not something that can be controlled by government with regards to law.

But the government deals especially well in the creation and enforcement of contracts. And marriage is nothing but a legal contract, which has nothing to do with love or emotion in the eyes of legal law. Therefore, marriage is indeed something that can be controlled by government with regards to positive law.

This again makes love a negative right and marriage a positive right.

I imagine right about now your emotion has kicked in again and you are feeling something that is causing you to perhaps forget that legality has no hindrance of emotion. This disposition may be getting in the way of your understanding of why or how love can ever be considered a negative thing. And some folks may musingly be thinking the opposite about marriage being a positive thing! But the confusion is only there because you are assigning emotion to the equation of the definitions of a legal construct. You must never do this. And one of the most difficult aspects of truly understanding the law and how it applies to living man is to be able to switch back and forth between the conversational and the legal language. For while we express our emotions through our interjectional conversations among other living humans, we must assume an unemotional state of person-hood when we switch over to the legal language. For the legal language is nothing if not a perversion of the natural state of man. Thus, we must recognize this perversion and imitate it in order to succeed in legal dealings and communications. If I am going to speak to an android, I would not expect that machine to contemplate morals or ethics other than what is written into its software and codes as a simulation. So why should I do anything different when speaking the legal language to an attorney or a judge? To them, you are nothing but an artificial person, and they are speaking the legal language without the limitations of human emotion if indeed they are doing their jobs correctly. They, in their capacities and regulations as officers of the court, are perversions of man that can only act within the scope of their written code and court procedures. They are legal automatons working in a fictional legal world that in my opinion no man should ever lay his natural rights or trust within. Doing so creates a contract of acceptance of the moral perversions of the legal language, the giving up of negative rights for positive ones, and acquiescence to all of the codes that are created and opinion-ed by such legal automatons in government.

And so your confusion about why a negative right is actually a good thing can be compared to traveling to another country and attempting to speak a new language there. In China, a horse may have the same name as a pig does in America. Thus, confusion may stem in conversations with the Chinese people when they call a horse a pig. But after a while, one becomes accustomed to switching back and forth between ones natural or “1st” language and that of the foreign language.

To most people, the legal language is certainly a foreign one. And so for now, simply realize that any confusion that you may be experiencing is just a loss in translation from your normal every-day conversational language to the foreign legal language.

A negative right is very much a good thing. Sometimes negative rights are referred to as “liberties”. Negative rights are also stated to be “unalienable” – which in legal language means that a legal lien cannot be taken out against that negative right. The constitution lays out some of these unalienable rights in a legal context, but is certainly no guarantee of such an unalienable status upon those constitutional (positive) rights. The thought that any legal document can ever guarantee another legal thing or right as unalienable is pure fallacy. For remember, a legal right is a positive right. And a legal positive right can be revoked at any time by its creator. Perhaps this is why God’s law in its permanence over man’s law is so important. We will talk about that in a moment.

Instead, the constitution as a legal document contradicts the very essence of protecting negative or “unalienable” rights as it boldly describes the ways in which such supposedly unalienable rights may indeed have liens put upon them or against them through legal means. And because of this, you will continuously hear me state loudly and fervently that my “rights” are absolutely not derived from the constitution or any other man-made law or legal code.

I have stated many times before that the 5th Amendment of the “BILL OF RIGHTS” in the U.S. constitution is perhaps the worst example of the deceptive nature of the legal language I have ever encountered. Perhaps in understanding what a “liberty” is as a negative (natural) right can help us to understand why the constitution in no way whatsoever gives individuals unalienable (negative) rights.

The 5th Amendment states:

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Geez, the constitution uses longer run-on sentences than I do!

Firstly, this is the right of persons, not men. A fictional person cannot have unalienable rights. A person can only be granted political positive rights.

Secondly, we must know what a “bill” is:

BILL, legislation. An instrument drawn or presented by a member or committee to a legislative body for its approbation and enactment. After it has gone through both houses and received the constitutional sanction of the chief magistrate, where such approbation is requisite, it becomes a law.

This nickname given to the first ten amendments to the constitution is not an official legal term, but instead borrows from the original English term of the “Bill Of Rights”, which was a declaration granted by Royals William and Mary who reigned England. But this was not a declaration of natural rights of the British people, but was instead a declaration of the rights bestowed upon the SUBJECTS of the crown. Again, this can be compared to a farmer declaring positive rights of a bail of hey to be fed to his cows (subjects) twice a day. But with these seemingly wonderful rights also come the duties to submit as subjects to all other rights forced upon the subjects.

And what is the legal definition of “subject”?

SUBJECT, contracts. The thing which is the object of an agreement.

–=–

SUBJECT, persons, government. An individual member of a nation, who is subject to the laws; this term is used in contradistinction to citizen, which is applied to the same individual when considering his political rights. 2. In monarchical governments, by subject is meant one who owes permanent allegiance to the monarch.

–=–

SUBJECTION. The obligation of one or more persons to act at the discretion, or according to the judgment and will of others. 2. Subjection is either private or public. By the former is meant the subjection to the authority of private persons; as, of children to their parents, of apprentices to their masters, and the like. By the latter is understood the subjection to the authority of public persons.

–=–

CITIZEN, persons. One who, under the constitution and laws of the United States, has a right to vote for representatives in congress, and other public officers, and who is qualified to fill offices in the gift of the people. In a more extended sense, under the word citizen, are included all white persons born in the United States, and naturalized persons born out of the same, who have not lost their right as such. This includes men, women, and children. 2. Citizens are either native born or naturalized. Native citizens may fill any office; naturalized citizens may be elected or appointed to any office under the constitution of the United States, except the office of president and vice-president. The constitution provides, that ” the citizens of each state shall be entitled to all the privileges and immunities of citizens in the several states.” Art. 4, s. 2. 3. All natives are not citizens of the United States; the descendants of the aborigines, and those of African origin, are not entitled to the rights of citizens. Anterior to the adoption of the constitution of the United States, each state had the right to make citizens of such persons as it pleased. That constitution does not authorize any but white persons to become citizens of the United States; and it must therefore be presumed that no one is a citizen who is not white.

Now, you should be wondering how a “right” can ever be “lost”. Of course, only political (positive law) rights can be taken away by government. Natural rights must be voluntarily given up to government.

But you may also be wondering why I am including these antiquated definitions within this essay.

The answer is an important realization about rights in general. For to declare that all men are created equal, and then to claim citizenship only for white persons should be a big clue to you that the legal law sees no equity but that for which is written by the hands of privileged men. And the preponderance by 100’s of millions of U.S. citizens that the constitution ever granted equal rights in natural men is the greatest fallacy of our time. Instead, the constitution literally and clearly states that only certain individuals (persons) are equally privileged and have the right to entitlements as positive rights that trample on the negative rights of all other colored or female persons.

And if you are not a citizen… let’s face it folks, then you are just an animal without government granted privileges and positive rights.

But even more importantly to comprehend here is that just because the constitution and other legislation has been changed over time to reflect “equality” in all persons regardless of sex or color, this if anything proves that nothing in the constitution or civil rights is in anyway an unalienable negative right. In other words, as they were changed in the past, so too can they be changed in the future.

Just ask the Japanese American citizens who were imprisoned during World War II if all citizens are equal regardless of race or color?

Here in this Bill Of Rights we have a listing of 10 positive entitlements that people mistakenly refer to as unalienable negative rights or liberties. But these are not in any way negative rights. They are instead listed here as positive rights that can be aliened upon through what is called “due process of law“.

This is why I call these an “exception clause”… and the constitution and all of legal code is riddled with them.

If your protections from double jeopardy and self-incrimination, and your protections of the rights of life, liberty, and property are indeed absolute and unalienable, then there would be no need to write them down in the first place, let alone place an exception clause within this statement (bill) of rights that allowed “due process of law” to deny you those very rights. In this way, these listed constitutional positive rights are not at all unalienable, and the constitution states clearly the “process” of how a lien can indeed be placed upon these listed positive rights – with due process of law.

Just ask anyone whose had their land stolen by government for “public use” through “eminent domain”; having watched in horror and helplessness as that land was then sold off to private corporate developers for a parking garage, a strip mall, or housing projects. Then ask that person whether they feel that their rights to property and liberty are secure and unalienable?

The 5th Amendment is the entire basis of the positive right of eminent domain claimed by government. In eminent domain cases, the 5th Amendment is noted as being the “takings clause“. This refers to the “exception clause” as noted within the 5th Amendment that property can be “taken” for public use by government with due process of law and “just compensation“. It is a fallacy to mistake the term “due process of law” with the “protection of natural rights”. Law and legal code can only protect legal or positive rights without exception.

If property rights were truly negative in nature for citizens, then government would be forced to respect the nature of that negative right without the ability to apply its right of positive law to nullify that individual persons’ negative right. In other words, the negative or natural right would not be able to be tread upon by a legal concoction of codes and concepts. A positive right by true republican idealism and rules of ethics can never trump a negative right.

In the case of eminent domain, with the backing and righteousness of the constitution itself, the government claims that it is your political “positive” right to literally have your land and home stolen by providing a remedy of what it terms to be “just compensation” for the imposing of that positive right upon you. We know this is a positive right when government won’t take no for an answer…

Imagine if I came up to your front door and handed you a check for $10,000 for the forceful purchase of your home that has a market value of $200,000 – me being just some guy with no government or militarized police force to back me up. Your first inclination would likely be to tell me to go stick my check where the sun don’t shine. But when government comes-a-knocking, our knees quiver and our head spins; for we know not how to tell government to stick its positive law where the sun doth not shineth.

So what’s the difference between when an average every day Joe “offers” you the contract of his version of “just compensation” in exchange for your home and when government makes you the same legal contractual offer?

Ah, this is where positive and negative rights truly come into play…

When the man approaches you to purchase your home, you use your negative right to say no to the contract offered by this individual man. You did not recognize his person, and refused the right of contract – acting in a negative capacity. This means that you have imposed the consequence of your negative right upon the man and expect him to fulfill his natural duty to uphold your right to say no. The abeyance and non-retaliation against your own negative rights by others with similar negative rights is called a “duty”. Thus, when average Joe made the offer for your home at a ridiculously low price, well below the market value of what you might sell that same house to another individual, it was your negative right to deny that offer of contract. It is now the duty of average Joe to respect your negative right to say no by walking away from the offer without force, retaliation, or theft of your property.

Duty has a direct association with negative rights. The consequence of a man declaring his natural, God-given, negative rights means that all other men of good conscious have the duty to respect that negative right. Thus, a negative right creates a duty in others to refrain from taking action against another. So a negative right is best explained as the right to not have “due process of law”, violence, or coercion forced against you. Therefore, a negative right is the right to be left alone. So Joe would respect your negative right to say no to his offer by fulfilling his natural or negative duty to not coerce you to sell your house to him. When this process is complete, the natural or unalienable right has been fully implemented and respected.

Under this system of respect and integrity between men, a lawful society without government can be imagined.  But since we live in and except the artificial world of fictional persons we must understand how this mutually respectful system of trust and integrity-based law has been perverted by government legal codes and its courts – which claim the very power of “due process of law” as listed in the Bill of Rights. In this regard, the constitution is in direct violation of all of man’s natural rights.

Before we can go on, this realization must be acknowledged: that the constitution does not give inalienable rights to individuals. Without this conscious admission, we cannot proceed. And we must fully realize and appreciate that the difference between a negative right and a positive right is that a negative right will never be written down as a legal right. Only a positive right must be written down, for this is the only way that a positive right may be enforced through due process of law to have power over a negative right. A positive right is adjudicated under positive law. And through the perversion of the legal code and its contractual nature, men are tricked into accepting positive rights that are in direct conflict with their natural/negative rights. They voluntarily relinquish the right to utilize negative rights against legal positive rights. Without the contractual nature of legal codes, no positive right of men could ever overshadow a negative right of God. In other words, the duty of men to respect and acknowledge the natural rights of their fellow man would never be excusable under color of law just because that man has a government ID, a police uniform, or a judges robe. The acceptance of a voluntary contractual obligation of positive rights by “citizens” allows other men to act as perverted beasts – artificial persons that trample upon any semblance of another man’s natural/negative right to not to be trampled on in the first place, with the excuse that their duty to respect man’s negative rights do not exist in legal code and are justified through due process of law, which is forcibly served upon that person/citizen for the benefit of the collective “public”. And in doing so, any recompense or remedy for their actions is applied not to the man himself for committing these acts of violence, coercion, and theft (taking) of property against the natural rights of another man, but are instead considered legal actions by an artificial person against another artificial person and its estate. You might say that no man was harmed, but only his dead or artificial person. This is referred to as acting under the “color of law”. Thus, the man doing the taking is not responsible for his own actions – actions taken by an artificial person (an incorporated entity with limited liability) on behalf of the due process of law of government. Positive rights then really equate to moral corruption of the living man in lieu of legal protections granted to the artificial person for which that man carries – the veil of artificial and limited liability corporation status called person-hood. And with this disposition; as in the art and atrocities of war where men kill men while claiming the positive right to do so as their perverted legal “duty” in the following of orders; men avoid their true and natural duties to protect the sanctity, integrity, freedom, and livelihood of the rest of their fellow man by claiming that due process of law allows constitutional and legal authority to do so. And government protects that positive right.

And so we now take for our example the constitutionally proclaimed power by government to at any time, through due process of law  and with just compensation, “take” your property through this process of eminent domain. To do this, the government exercises the true nature of your constitutional “rights” by utilizing the legal system of which government created in the first place. Thus, the taking of your property is justified by these artificial persons in government with the disclaimer that they as men are not responsible for the theft of your property because the due process of law allows such perversion of responsibility to be delegated to an artificial construct within the protection of legal code. Government officers are not men, but instead an incorporated group of persons. They have the positive (government granted and protected) right to ignore their duties to uphold and respect your negative rights because you agreed through contract to consent and be subject to these positive rights granted by government. They claim this positive right for one and only one reason: because you unwittingly told them they could. You gave up your natural rights when you became a citizen, accepting positive rights through contract. And every time that you state a pledge of allegiance to the “flag” of this artificial corporation called the United States (not a pledge to the other people within these united states of America and their natural rights, mind you), and every time you check the box that states you are a “citizen of the United States”, and every time you claim legal constitutional rights instead of negative natural rights, you are literally giving your consent and permission for government to tread on you and your negative rights via contractual obligations and duties to government’s provided positive rights and services.

Understanding and proving to government that you are alive 100% of your life seems like a ridiculous notion. But the truth is that government requires you to be dead for any transaction in commerce or contract with itself, and assigns you an artificial person for such commerce and communication. Proving that you are alive every minute of every day of your life while claiming only natural rights is the only true defense against government tyranny. Any other right provided by government and claimed by you in court is of a contractual nature, meaning it is by default a revokable and enforceable positive right – the validity of which will be decided by an artificial person known as a judge.

A negative right is the right not to be subjected to the actions and coercion of another man, person, or government.

A positive right is the right to be subjected to the actions and coercions of another man, person, or government.

A free man has the right not to be subjected to the actions and coercion of another man, person, or government.

A citizen has the right to be subjected to the actions and coercions of another man, person, or government.

A free man enjoys the negative right to be free under God and nature, deriving his rights as such.

A citizen enjoys the positive right (privilege) to be free under government, as long as and only if he obeys the law (legal codes) of that government no matter how tyrannical and inhumane they become.

The perversion of the words positive and negative is just one example of how the legal language harms man’s natural state of being by perverting even the basic definition of natural words. However, legal words only apply in the fictional legal realm, which is why of course living men must be attached to an artificial person.

But I digress, for the title of this writing is “Tyranny Requires Equality”.

And so I had better now qualify why I believe that this is so…

Just as the words negative and positive have been perverted into different meanings than we are accustomed to in our everyday speech, so too have the words equality and rights.

It is important to understand that as with all legal terms, when the legal language uses the word equality it does not predispose that such equality is espoused by living men. Remember, the legal code does not deal in living beings. It can only define legal terms for artificial persons attached to human animals. Thus, when the government states that all men are created equal, it doesn’t really mean that in literal terms. It is referring to persons. And it is referring to the way in which the law punishes equally that of all persons under the law.

Let’s face the hard truth… When the constitution and Declaration of Independence was penned over two centuries ago, the term men combined with the term equal only applied to white male land-owners. As much as it pains us to admit that the constitution did not in any way make all men equal, and in fact made some men 3/5 a person (not a man) for political purposes, we must admit that the constitution was only a legal document granting subjects of the government certain entitlements. It did not deal in men as flesh and blood human animals, it dealt strictly with artificial persons. A statement of equality as is laid down in the constitution does not necessitate the conversational meaning of that word when describing flesh and blood men, race, or color. In fact, since the constitution only applies to persons as citizens, its privileges also only apply to persons as citizens. Remember, a legal government document only applies to men who have taken the perversion of artificial person-hood. The constitution promoted slavery and entitled only the privileged class to “freedom” – which again means the requirement to obey the law. And it can only be considered a document of freedom for those who contractually accepted the legal definition of freedom to “obey the government’s laws”. The constitution, if anything, made all men un-free, but gave the privileged class of white male citizens the “freedom” to arbitrarily own other men and be higher in legal status than the female half of the species. Of course, the contract of marriage created the STRAWMAN Dominus name change that allowed women to obtain some of the rights of their husbands via a legal contractual nature.

This ownership of people was without question or doubt the “original intent” of the constitution. Just read the damn thing! And remember that slavery was outlawed in England long before it was in the United States.

Over the decades, incremental change began to be seen, amendments passed, and legislation created that allowed for all “persons” to obtain “equal rights” under the law. But remember that these were certainly not natural rights granted by the government, but were instead positive rights. And slowly but surely all persons were made civilly equal. But what this really meant was that all men were allowed to accept the perversion of their natural state of being men and were allowed to become persons. And so again, I cannot stress enough that the constitution only makes contractual obligations of men as persons for which it calls “equal” and “civil” rights. Again, any natural man, woman, or child who wonders into the fictional borders of the United States will know immediately that all men are not equal, but that equality requires the voluntary agreement and contract of tyranny of citizenship. An illegal alien is simply a man who has not sold his soul for the positive rights and entitlements of citizenship. And the treatment, imprisonment, and exportation of these “human animals” by government and it’s millions of citizens is enough evidence to me to call any woman, black man, or legal immigrant a total and complete hypocrite – one who screams for their equal rights from a government and constitution that for centuries denied their ancestors those same rights that they now deny all other men of the world. Americans are hypocrisy defined – free men enslaved by their own freedom. And the white, property-owning citizen is ironically the only non-hypocrite… but only because his ancestors were born into the privileges of citizenship in the first place that denied all others their own rights and entitlements.

Never again should any United States citizen falsely and hypocritically declare that all men are created equal. For they are not men – as citizens they are not even alive.

This is the oft quoted fallacy that plagues the people of the United States and other governments. For government can not declare all men as equal and free, but can only declare its citizens as equal with freedom. For what happens when one bucks their government and tries to act upon their natural God-given rights in their negative capacity and as protection against the forcibly assigned positive rights violently bestowed by that government upon its people? Why of course the government violates the man’s natural rights claiming that his person’s positive rights come first!

And this is the most difficult thing about law and rights to comprehend. For most people believe that rights are somehow voluntary, and don’t realize that there is such a thing as positive rights that are involuntary. It’s certainly a confusing concept – that there should be in existence a human right that is enforceable by punishment from government, whether you want that right or not. Well… that’s because people think only in terms of humanity, and not in the terms of their artificial person for which those forced rights apply.

Another example I like to use over and over is this one from TITLE 42 of U.S. CODE. This code is in my opinion the perfect examination of how a “positive right” is actually a forced privilege through coercion and violence upon persons and not men:

42 USC § 1981 – Equal rights under the law

(a) Statement of equal rights

All persons within the jurisdiction of the United States shall have the same right in every State and Territory to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, give evidence, and to the full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings for the security of persons and property as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, penalties, taxes, licenses, and exaction of every kind, and to no other

(b) “Make and enforce contracts” defined

For purposes of this section, the term “make and enforce contracts” includes the making, performance, modification, and termination of contracts, and the enjoyment of all benefits, privileges, terms, and conditions of the contractual relationship.

(c) Protection against impairment

The rights protected by this section are protected against impairment by nongovernmental discrimination and impairment under color of State law.

And so here in one neat little package, the tyranny requires equality concept comes shining through. Remember, as stated here, the nature of “civil rights” is not to make men equal, but to make all persons equally screwed under the law. Government does not define men. It’s legal language simply makes all human animals as equal citizens – which means equal protection of the positive rights that are forced upon those citizens. This is the tyranny of legal equality. True natural equality will only ever happen in the minds of men, not through statute or positive right. It will never happen in all men, and no legal statute will ever succeed in this task. For the acceptance of all men as equal is a negative right, and this type of acceptance can only happen within men, not without. The bottom line is that respect for human and animal rights must be earned and learned, not entitled and forced.

First, in Section (a) of this U.S. CODE we have an explanation of your positive rights as an (artificial) person within the jurisdiction of the United States (federal government) – the federation controlling the “union” of States. It tells you that you have the positive right to enter into contract equally with all other persons, and most importantly into contracts with government. And then it tells you that by committing to such a contractual nature, the positive rights of punishment, pains, penalties, taxes, licenses, and exaction (literally defined as legal extortion) are applied to you under that contract. If you sign a government or other contract, you are subject to positive rights. If you sign a contract, you give up your power of natural negative rights in acceptance of politically assigned privileges called positive rights. And in doing so, as a person and citizen, you are subject to all of the coercive measures that government allows itself to use against you to enforce those positive rights against you, including pain, punishment, and extortion.

Notice here that taxation and extortion are listed here side by side as a your right. There is hardly a difference between the two, and the avoidance of both gives you the positive, forceful, contractual duty to give acceptance to your right to be receive (enjoy) penalties, be punished, and be put in pain.

Now do you understand what a positive right is?

In Section (c) it states something that is also very important. It implies here that State laws, when compared to Federal laws, are subservient to these Federal U.S. CODES. By stating that the laws of the government of the individual States are only assigned to be as authoritative as to the “color of law”, this code is stating that you have no positive State’s rights that will protect you against these stated Federal positive rights. Federal contract law (citizenship), in other words, trumps any state law that may protect any other right you enjoy, either positive or negative. In other words, as a citizen you really have no negative rights!!!

But most important here is the legal right that all persons have to be equal with every other person. The last thing that government wants is for a man to break out of his or her artificial person/cage and be special – and claim to be unequal in the eyes of the legal code. Only with equality can democracy exist. Only with uniform equality can the people be considered a “body politic”. And only in a body politic can the government claim to act with the consent of all the equal people through representative government – representatives of the whole equal citizenry.

Some folks think that by exercising their right not to vote in elections that they are withdrawing consent to the election itself. But not voting is just another political positive right that persons have, in that this duty is not enforced as a requirement. Not voting is technically voting “no contest” to what the majority votes. Government doesn’t mind at all if individuals don’t vote in its public elections, for not voting means nothing at all. Even with less than 50% of the people voting in an election cycle, the majority of those actual votes still creates a majority vote. There is no law stating otherwise. And the president is not elected by the people anyway, but instead by the “electors”. That’s right, the constitution clearly states that the president is not elected by the people (voters) by popular vote, but by appointed electors. Amazingly, the majority of United States citizens believe that they actually elect the president every four years – a laughable psy-op that creates the illusion of authority of that office.

If this is news to you, you’ll be tickled to death to know that migrants who obtain citizenship in the United States know more about our presidential election process than most natural born citizens do!

Here is a link to the questions asked of potential legal immigrants before they become citizens. You’ll notice that question #16 asks: “Who elects the President of the United States?”

Scroll down a ways and you’ll see “The Electoral College” as the official answer.

LINK: http://immigration.findlaw.com/citizenship/typical-citizenship-examination-questions.html?DCMP=ADC-IMMI_Citizenship-NaturalizationTestQuestions&HBX_PK=the+naturalization+test+questions

Elections are a positive, not a negative right. Citizens do not have negative rights, other than those which have not been supplanted YET by positive ones.

What is the definition of the word “negative”?

NEGATIVE. This word has several significations. 1. It is used in contradistinction to giving assent; thus we say the president has put his negative upon such a bill. Vide Veto. 2. It is also used in contradistinction to affirmative; as, a negative does not always admit of the simple and direct proof of which an affirmative is capable. When a party affirms a negative in his pleadings, and without the establishment of which, by evidence, he cannot recover or defend himself, the burden of the proof lies upon him, and he must prove the negative. Although as a general rule the affirmative of every issue must be proved, yet this rule ceases to operate the moment the presumption of law is thrown into the other scale. When the issue is on the legitimacy of a child, therefore, it is incumbent on the party asserting the illegitimacy to prove it. Vide Affirmative Innocence.

NEGATIVE AVERMENT, pleading, evidence. An averment in some of the pleadings in a case in which a negative is asserted. 2. It is a general rule, established for the purpose of shortening and facilitating investigations, that the point in issue is to be proved by the party who asserts the affirmative; but as this rule is not founded on any presumption of law in favor of the party, but is merely a rule of practice and convenience, it, ceases in all cases when the presumption of law is thrown into the opposite scale. For example, when the issue is on the legitimacy of a child born in lawful wedlock, it is, incumbent on the party asserting its illegitimacy to prove it. Upon the same principle, when, the negative averment involves a charge of criminal neglect of duty, whether official or otherwise, it must be proved, for the law presumes every man to perform the duties which it imposes. Vide Onus Probandi.

And from Webster’s 2012 dictionary:

NEGATIVE-

(1) a: marked by denial, prohibition, or refusal <received a negative answer>; also : marked by absence, withholding, or removal of something positive <the negative motivation of shame — Garrett Hardin>

b (1) : denying a predicate of a subject or a part of a subject <“no A is B” is a negative proposition> (2) : denoting the absence or the contradictory of something <nontoxic is a negative term> (3) : expressing negation <negative particles such as no and not>

c : adverse, unfavorable <the reviews were mostly negative>

(5) a : not affirming the presence of a condition, substance, or organism suspected to be present; also : having a test result indicating the absence especially of a condition, substance, or organism <she is HIV negative>

By these definitions we can construct a view of how the word negative applies to and interacts with the word positive in law. A negative right attempts to remove or refuse a positive right, and a man seeks to withhold or remove the positive right with his negative right. Negative rights are a prohibition against positive ones. A living man may deny a positive right exists by denoting the contradiction of that positive right to his negative right. A living man must prove the non-existence of a positive. Positive rights directly contradict negative rights, negating the inherent and replacing it with the artificial, creating an absence of liberty. Positive is adverse and unfavorable to the negative. Men must not affirm the presence of a positive right, unless he is prepared to accept the conditions of its disease.

Even the word enjoyment has been twisted into a legal perversion, as defined in Bouvier’s:

ENJOYMENT. The right which a man possesses of receiving all the product of a thing for his necessity, his use, or his pleasure.

And Black’s Law Dictionary online defines Enjoyment as:

ENJOYMENT: 1 (a) possession and use <the enjoyment of civic rights>

And from Webster’s:

ENJOYMENT: The exercise of a right; the possession and fruition of a right, privilege, or incorporeal hereditament.

So while you may emotionally enjoy living somewhere, enjoyment is a legal term with no emotional attachments. It is the state of usufruct to which you are a person who enjoys the use of property, but do not legally own that property. Paying off a loan to a bank, it turns out, has absolutely nothing to do with ownership, as the home never belonged to the bank in the first place. A “lien” position is not an ownership position, but rather just a status of legal claim.

Legislative records explain this positive right of equal enjoyment best:

“The ultimate ownership of all property is in the State; individual so-called “ownership” is only by virtue of government, i.e. law, amounting to mere user; and user must be in accordance with law and subordinate to the necessities of the State.” Senate Document No. 43, 73D Congress, 1st Session, entitled: “Contracts Payable in Gold”, by George Cyrus Thorpe, submitted to the senate: April 17, 1933

“The money will be worth 100 cents on the dollar because it is backed by the credit of the Nation. It will represent a mortgage on all the homes and other property of all the people in the Nation.” –Congressman Patman, speaking from the Congressional Record of March 9, 1933, and referring to the Act of March 9, 1933.

Enjoyment is use, as a user, of government property. Persons are not owners, they are users. Persons enjoy incorporeal use of real estate. The word estate in Latin means “status”. And a status of course is an entitlement – a positive right.

But don’t worry, all property holders have equal rights under the law – which really means that all property holders cannot say no when the government wants to eminent domain (legally steal) their property. Equal rights means equal enjoyment of equal extortion, which means equal victim-hood of the people is equally enjoyed as persons under the contractual nature of citizenship. Does it make you feel better that at any time the government can take anyone’s property, including your own? Does this equate to the disposition we take when our friends and neighbors have their property stolen by government for the public good? You are the “public”, you know.

Is it this equality of the possibility of legal theft upon all citizens that stops us from defending the property of our fellow man?

Have we been artificial for so long that we are becoming emotionless?

Have we grown to love our servitude, as Huxley declared so long ago?

Perhaps we have just lost our ability to do anything but legally enjoy our servitude – and have forgotten how to be free men.

Equality in legal terms is a detriment to all men, for no two men are alike. Under the law, men and women have no sex, except as a mechanical function in science. Their uniqueness is stripped away and replaced by a legal status. Their thoughts and ideas are stunted so that equality can prevail. By accepting the artificial person, the living soul becomes nothing but a user of the body – with enjoyment of the artificial person which interacts with the artificial world. In this way, the man hides away behind the mask of his or her person.

But the person is not the man, it is not created by the man, and it is not owned by the man. The person is a creation of and property of the government, assigned numbers and statistics which define each artificial person. And only the creator of persons can establish forced equality and tyranny among all persons equally.

And so I leave you with these final questions…

If government is the creator of persons, then isn’t it time to stop worshiping these idols of the false god of government and get back to nature’s and God’s law?

Who is your creator?

Isn’t it time to become a man again?

.

–Clint Richardson (Realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Tuesday, February 19, 2013