Inside The Paradigm – Where Do You Hide?


Paradigm – A set of assumptions, concepts, values, and practices that constitutes a way of viewing reality for the community that shares them, especially in an intellectual discipline. (dictionary.com)

I found this to be a most interesting definition of this word – paradigm. It states that when we as a group or number of people are stimulated to collectively believe in the same way, we are basing that belief on our assumptions, concepts, values, and practices. Most notable about all of these words in their semantic meanings, is that they are all four based on hearsay instead of factual evidence. Let’s look closer at this revelation:

From dictionary.com:

1) Assumption – Arrogance; presumption. Something taken for granted or accepted as true without proof; a supposition. The act of taking for granted or supposing.

2) Concept – A scheme; a plan. Something formed in the mind; a thought or notion. An idea of something formed by mentally combining all its characteristics or particulars; a construct.

3) Values – To consider with respect to worth, excellence, usefulness, or importance. To regard or esteem highly. To rate according to relative estimate of worth or desirability; evaluate. To assign a value to. A principle, standard, or quality considered worthwhile or desirable. In Mathematics – magnitude; quantity; number represented by a figure, symbol, or the like. In Ethics – any object or quality desirable as a means or as an end in itself.

4) Practices – To perform or do habitually or usually. To follow or observe habitually or customarily: to practice one’s religion. Habitual or customary performance; operation. Habit; custom. In Law – the established method of conducting legal proceedings. In Archaic – plotting; intrigue; trickery. To plot or conspire.

As we can see by these dictionary definitions, all four of these words are non-factual. They are based in non-reality. They require belief, or faith. And most importantly, they do not require proof. So, a paradigm could be defined as follows: a state of belief and compliance in some thing or idea, where one or more people follow what they consider to be true without the benefit of any factual evidence supporting that belief and their compliance to improvable and idealistic concepts.

One could consider livestock in this examination as an equitable synonym to the power of this paradigm. As lambs are lead to the slaughter, as Lemmings ironically follow each other off a cliff, and as sheep follow in packs of oblivious domesticated herds, so too do the masses of people follow their paradigm of perception and belief.

Let’s look at some examples of these types of paradigms:

Politics –

Usually, when one thinks in terms of American politics, one associates oneself with one of three parties: Democrat, Republican, or 3rd party. These can also be said to be politically left, right, and center (or alternative). Alex Jones brilliantly coined the phrase, “the left-right paradigm”, meaning that most people, due to their above defined assumptions, concepts, values, and practices, are mentally blocked from understanding the bigger picture (habit and custom) and so subscribe to the illusion of being left or right, democrat or republican, liberal or conservative, as if there were no other options outside of this illusionary paradigm.

Though there were eight candidates running for president in the 2008 election, we found that because the media blacked out and ignored any fair coverage of these other six candidates (except for brief side-stories of unwarranted and inaccurate ridicule and humiliation) the vast majority of voters would not even consider a 3rd party candidate due to the stigma that has been attached to these “outside the box”, enormously qualified competitors. When asked about their reluctance to vote for an alternative candidate, the overwhelming reaction and response was negative, and most truly believed that a 3rd party actually cannot and will not ever be voted into office. Their proof…? Hearsay.

They are stuck in the right-left paradigm.

Even voters who use the Constitution of the United States in their political debate and rhetoric have no idea that there is even a Constitutional Party. While many voters complain that their government has gotten too big and powerful for the peoples liberty, the Libertarian Party remains constantly invisible to voters even though this party’s main platform is in fact the reduction in both size, power, and world expansion of our government and military. Even the Green Party remains a void in comprehension for the masses that are stuck in their paradigm. The fact is that the biggest polluters on the planet are subsidized and de-regulated by the democratic and republican two-party system of government. And in turn these huge corporations are the main contributors to these democratic and republican campaigns (which ensures continued pollution and non-green policies and products). Wouldn’t it make more sense to vote for the “Green” Party, if only by simple word association?

Can the media really spin political bullshit so deeply into people’s minds that they truly believe that a square peg can fit into a round hole?

Apparently so…

– Food –

How many times have you heard a vegetarian say I occasionally eat meat? Or that eggs and milk aren’t really meat. How about a kosher Jewish man that eats at Denny’s? How many strictly organic food eaters shop at huge conglomerate grocery stores, without a clue that organic on the label only means that 75% of it’s ingredients have to be organic? And how many of them fall for the “all-natural” label? Arsenic is all-natural. Heck, so is human feces, though I suppose it could loosely be considered man-made! And with the crap that passes for food now days, I suppose even our poop isn’t qualified to be called organic any more…

The point is, consumers one and all fall for the same old marketing tricks that are used in politics. When a huge corporate conglomerate bought up Ben and Jerry’s Ice Cream company many years ago, they didn’t change the label! The picture of those two fat guys still entice buyers to purchase this product, even while they lay on a lounge chair at Club Med for the rest of their obese lives and laugh at the irony of it all, that is if they haven’t died from an even more ironic heart attack by now. The paradigm of just accepting that the food, meat, produce, and pharmaceutical industries have our best interests as consumers in mind when they sell us their products is absolutely ridiculous.

Monsanto and companies like it have succeeded in genetically altering and contaminating most of our food supply to the point where its nutrition value is so depleted that it is now deadly and cancer causing. Case in point: Monsanto has completely inundated the market with their Round-up ready, genetically altered corn and soybeans. Since most of our products are now made with corn, corn syrup, high-fructose corn syrup, corn oil, soybean oil, partially hydrolyzed soybean oil, and on and on and on, we can barely escape eating this poisonous corn or soybeans. Cows and pigs eat this corn, and are therefore contaminated with this genetically altered unnatural ingredient. Do you eat meat? Well then, you eat Monsanto corn!

We feed our pets kibbles and bits of the worst possible scraps of meat and cancerous growths from the beef and poultry industries; spoiled, contaminated, and not fit for human consumption. Why do we do this? Because we like the commercials where the beautiful dog has the high-pro-glow. Product placement. Brand loyalty. But you can rest assured that the dog in that commercial has never eaten the product it is selling before that day! And you can also take it to the bank that the Monsanto executives and board members will not eat the products that they sell. These are upper class; the pedigreed (that’s pedi-GREED). There is a reason the Queen of England has her own organic garden and protected hunting grounds.

The dairy industry has its own set of paradigms in which we all fall under. Whole, 2%, 1%, low-fat, non-fat, skim… and non-dairy (main ingredients: corn syrup and partially hydrolyzed soybean oil). And then they have the clever ploy of printing on their label that they do not use the growth hormone rbst in their cows. And, for the unsuspecting consumer, this is true. But what they don’t comprehend is that there are a multitude of growth hormones that can be used, and that only this particular hormone was in fact not used in this particular dairy product.

Silly consumers…

So which of the food paradigms do you fall under… bottled water, false organic, all natural, diet, low-carb, fat free, or non-rbst? Any way you look at it, our assumptions, concepts, values, and practices are severely manipulated in the marketing of these products. And at this point, it is nearly impossible to eat non-contaminated, truly organic, actually natural, corn and soybean free, non-hormone laden products. Good luck though. Perhaps the usual ignorance will help us through this particular paradigm.

– Religion –

Being the ultimate in belief and faith-based paradigms, I have to give a shout out to the billions who subscribe to a particular religion. Personal enlightenment aside, the corporate religious paradigm actually succeeds in making its followers live less in the image of God!

For instance, the stories of Jesus are so far off from the way a typical Christian behaves and lives his or her life, that this is the biggest reason people are turned off by the Christian religions. The assumption (i.e. arrogance, presumption) that a man can know God while in this life is the basis of this paradigm of faith.

It is based on the concept (a scheme; a plan. Something formed in the mind; a thought or notion.) of God that was put forth in an ancient book, which has been transcribed, translated, cut, downsized, censored, and reinterpreted so many times that there is no way that its original message or historical factualness can be validated or even conceived.

And, it was written by men.

It is the basis for the values (To consider with respect to worth, excellence, usefulness, or importance. A principle, standard, or quality considered worthwhile or desirable. Any object or quality desirable as a means or as an end in itself.) for which Christians have and personify in life. Perhaps the definition of values has been taken to literal by the devout? Materialism is not what the writers of this book had in mind when trying to assign personal values. However, with the money that the corporate churches take in at the expense of their parishioners, perhaps it is the church itself that is the problem. Blind faith in the corporate materialistic church itself instead of the personal and loving nature of each of our individual interpretations of God might be the true paradigm that has corrupted the very best of us.

Based on the teachings of the corporate church, and not necessarily the teachings of the original bible, Christians and individual churches develop their practices (To perform or do habitually or usually. To follow or observe habitually or customarily. Habit; custom. Plotting; intrigue; trickery. To plot or conspire.) The inevitable destination of those with blind faith is ignorance. Belief in God or something necessarily unknown after this life is perfectly understandable and should be encouraged. Faith that the afterlife is and can only be one thing as determined by the church is perfectly irrational and downright frightening. The religious paradigm has led the masses into war, witch-burning, human and animal ritual sacrifice, a disrespect for nature, a sense of immortal irresponsibility for the earth and its other inhabitants, and has been used to control and manipulate these masses in a way that can’t be fully explained here. But this control influences politics and the very freedoms that we as a people hold dear. And the powers that be control these puppet strings of blind faith with precision and evil intent.

A good example of this manipulation of the religious paradigm which influences millions is this: By using the freedom of speech and the freedom of religion as a battle cry, Christians and other religious faiths are convinced that they must actually vote to take away other people’s or minority group’s civil and human rights. Even while the church and its followers are screaming about the attack on their freedom of religion as this basic human right is slowly getting drained away by legislation and other ignorant thinking, they mount insurmountable advertising campaigns to take away, through the vote, the rights of other groups. All the while never realizing what a hypocritical and non-peaceful thing they are doing.

With well over 1000 different official religions in this world, all claiming to be the one true religion, it is hard to believe that religious faith is even still a paradigm that we can all fall under the influence of…

Yet we do.

Religion and righteousness are not fit to be in the same equation. They are two different concepts – one of corruption and one of being incorruptible. My values come from deep within. They do not come from the fear of a selfish, omnipotent, unforgiving God, nor from the fear of His opposite – Satan. My practices and actions come from my righteousness, instinctively knowing what is right and what is wrong. Where those instincts come from I would never presume to have an assumption. And my concept of good and evil, positive and negative, light and dark, come from looking at all history, religions, texts, and most importantly the ancient knowledge that has been suppressed by the corporate church.

I applaud anyone that does anything righteous in the name of God (whatever your definition). But I can only condemn anyone who acts on behalf of the corporate church in the name of God, as if the church is a holy corporate middleman that has some unearthly powers to attune and command the thoughts and will of God.

We must break all of these paradigms in order to see the true nature of what is happening around us – how we are controlled and how we are being slowly made sick and dying in the name of profits and control.

Isn’t this what Jesus would do?

.

Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
February 1, 2010

Diplomacy and Barack Obama: The Audacity Of The Nobel Prize Committee


Barack Obama and diplomacy do not belong in the same sentence:

He has reinstated the Patriot Acts.

He has invaded Pakistan.

He continues to invade Afghanistan.

He pulled troops out of Iraq… only to replace them with even more private security “police” – a privately funded army.

He is about to make the biggest blunder in history… by attacking Iran.

He allows Israel to continue it’s genocidal violence and stealing of land from the Palestinians by giving billions of tax dollars to Israel.

He refuses to use diplomacy to require Israel to sign the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, while threatening attack against Iran (who is a signatory) for the false propaganda that Iran is in the process of building its first nuke. Israel, meanwhile, has enough warheads to blow up the planet.

He continues to support troops in the streets in America, against the Constitution.

He has helped the United Nations to implement forced abortion policies in Africa.

He has done nothing of any significance at all as President of the United States, except to ruin any modicom of freedom and Constitutional liberty we have left.

So, to the Nobel Prize Foundation, I must ask once again… where do you come up with this stuff?

It’s actions like these that make me hope that there is a God, so that your souls are judged and you burn in condemnation of your treachery and contempt of the human race. That includes you too Obama. For accepting this award is akin to stealing from church, as someone good and deserving will now not recieve recognition for his or her work – not that the Nobel Prize Foundation would ever do anything to promote real diplomacy or peace.

First Al Gore, and now Obama? I am now convinced that this foundation is completely corrupt and should be rejected, boycotted, and made a mockery of.

(See why here: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2009/10/07/158/)

Mr. President… your humility only fools the brainwashed idiots who elected you in the first place: who didn’t take the time to research you and your true nature and supporters. You are a travesty to America and the World, and when or if they realize your disgusting nature, I hope the wrath of their anger is felt by you in ways I can’t even begin to describe here.

.

Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)

October 9, 2009

The Nobel Prize: An Award For Liers Like Al Gore


I was really mad when I was fooled (apparently like millions of others) into believing that global warming was a man-made event, because I simply watched a movie called, “An Inconvenient Truth”. Al Gores movie won such massive acclaim, an academy award, countless accolades, and the man even won a Nobel Prize!

A Nobel Prize… I was especially curious about this. The Nobel Prize is a very distinguished and coveted award, and it’s not at all easy to be its champion. Therefore, when I found out that almost all of the information, facts, and figures used in Al Gore’s ‘shock-u-mentary’ were either doctored, misinterpreted, misrepresented, falsified, junk science, or completely fabricated lies, I wondered at the qualification process in being awarded a prize from the Nobel Foundation.

And so, I decided to send an email to the Nobel Foundation.

I had two questions.

1)    How does the group decide who to elect and what are the research and verification criteria involved?

2)    If a winner is proven to be a hoax, or in Gore’s case, use junk science and false information in his glorious work, is the prize then withdrawn or retracted from the corrupt recipient in question?

The following is a transcript of my correspondence.

—Ω—

To: comments@nobelprize.org
Date: Wednesday, July 1, 2009, 7:51 PM

Hello,

I have two questions I would greatly appreciate an answer to for a school project:

1) Has there ever been a case where, after earning a Nobel Prize, the prize was withdrawn due to dishonesty or fraud in the earning of said prize?

2) How was this acknowledged, and what would be the process for this to take place. (i.e. petitions, court case, vote, etc…)

I thank you for your time and consideration.

—Ω—

From: Sofia Bryngelson via RT <comments@nobelprize.org>
Subject: [nobelprize.org #3414] Help with questions…
Date: Friday, July 3, 2009, 1:25 AM

Hello,

Thank you for your interest in the Nobel Prize.

No, it is not possible to revoke a Nobel Prize, according the the statues of the Nobel Foundation § 10:

No appeals may be made against the decision of a prize-awarding body with regard to the award of a prize.

Proposals received for the award of a prize, and investigations and opinions concerning the award of a prize, may not be divulged. Should divergent opinions have been expressed in connection with the decisionof a prize-awarding body concerning the award of a prize, this may not be included in the record or otherwise divulged.

A prize-awarding body may, however, after due consideration in each individual case, permit access to material which formed the basis for the evaluation and decision concerning a prize, for purposes of research in intellectual history. Such permission may not, however, be granted until at least 50 years have elapsed after the date on which the decision in question was made.


Yours sincerely,

Sofia Bryngelson
Marketing and Communications Assistant
Nobelprize.org

—Ω—

To: comments@nobelprize.org c/o Sofia Bryngelson
Friday, July 3, 2009 4:44 PM

Hello Mrs. Bryngelson, and thank you for your timely response.

In regards to your answers to my previous questions, may I interpret your response as meaning – The Nobel Prize organization, if and when confronted with overwhelming evidence, obvious visual proof, or blatantly plagiarized writings or lies in regards to the qualifications and merits in the earning and bestowing of a past Nobel Prize, would not reconsider, convene a board to reconsider, or even mention to the public that the prize awarded was in fact earned under false pretenses, not merited, plagiarized, or was based on half-truths and lies?

And, if this is the case, what could possibly be a logical, reasonable, moral, or fiduciary  explanation for such behavior from a most respected organization?

As an organization with such uncompromisingly high standards of fiduciary responsibility to the world, I would be extremely disheartened with this organization which I have held in such high esteem for as long as I can remember if the above statements are indeed true.

This being said, the Nobel Prize surely represents the body of work of a person or group, and not the person alone. Therefore, if the “work” is proven to be contaminated or false after the prize is bestowed, surely the Nobel Prize committee would strive to keep it’s name in good standing as the premier academic amalgamate of our time by denouncing an award given under false or malevolent pretenses?

Again, your response to these inquiries is welcomed and eagerly anticipated.

Thank you,

Clint Richardson… a concerned citizen of the United States.

—Ω—

I never received a response to this, but today I resent the email hoping to ruffle some feathers and to make this apparently corrupt and phony organization own up to its deceit and fraudulent support of men like Al Gore.

I’ll keep sending this, and I’d really like for all of you to ask the same questions by emailing the Nobel Prize Foundation. Ask if they support global government. Ask if they support eugenics. And ask what their stance on depopulation, sustainable development through Agenda 21, and everything else these elitists are perpetrating on us.

Good luck and good night.

Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)

Czars: Unconstitutional, Unelected, Unofficial, And Unwanted!


There has been a lot of talk about the appointing of and use of Czars in the current Obama administration. Quite frankly, I had no idea what the connotation of this word was, nor what the historical power of that title really meant throughout history and today.

And so, being the ever-curious soul that I am, I did a bit of research.

I’d like to share that with you now:

(Emphasis mine throughout!)

What is a Czar?

According to the 1984 Webster’s New World Dictionary, Second College Edition – the term Czar is defined as:

Czar:

  1. An emperor: title of any of the former emperors of Russia, and at various times, the sovereigns of other Slavic nations.
  2. Any person having great or unlimited power over others; autocrat

Czarism:

  1. The Russian government under the Czars.
  2. Absolute rule; despotism

Hmmm… I don’t know about you, but that doesn’t sound very good to me. It certainly doesn’t sound like a Democracy or a Republic, where leaders are voted upon before entering office. And I refuse to believe that America has fallen so far as to be so ignorant of the past that their jaws don’t drop at the mere mention of the appointment of multiple “Czars” into their government.

Since this was a hard cover traditional dictionary from 1984 (a fitting year for this information, if you ask me) I thought this might be a biased, older, or out of date description of the word used to describe the people who are now advising our president.

So, I checked the Internet.

Here’s what I found there…

I went to Wikipedia, a site I would never use as a source of accurate information, but one none the less that many people do, despite it’s ability to be changed by even the most moronic of its users. But I figure that at least this is the going public opinion of what a Czar might be. Never the less, after some fact-checking… here’s what it said:

Tzar or Czar (Bulgarian, Russian, Ukrainian, Serbian): Term with Bulgarian origins used to designate certain monarchs. The first ruler to adopt the title tsar was Simeon I of Bulgaria.

Originally, the title Czar (derived from Caesar) meant Emperor in the European medieval sense of the term, that is, a ruler who claims the same rank as a Roman emperor, with the approval of another emperor or a supreme ecclesiastical official (the Pope or the Ecumenical Patriarch).

Occasionally, the word could be used to designate other, non-Christian, supreme rulers. In Russia and Bulgaria the imperial connotations of the term were blurred with time and, by the 19th century, it had come to be viewed as an equivalent of King.

“Tsar” was the official title of the supreme ruler in the following states:

  • Bulgaria in 913–1018, in 1185–1422 and in 1908–1946
  • Serbia in 1346–1371
  • Russia from about 1547 until 1721 (replaced in 1721 by imperator, but remained in common usage until 1917).

Under the heading “Metaphorical Uses” Wiki-Pedia states:

Like many lofty titles, e.g. Mogul, Tsar or Czar has been used as a metaphor for positions of high authority, in English since 1866 (referring to U.S. President Andrew Johnson), with a connotation of dictatorial powers and style, fitting since “Autocrat” was an official title of the Russian Emperor (informally referred to as ‘the Tsar’). Similarly, Speaker of the House Thomas Brackett Reed was called “Czar Reed” for his dictatorial control of the House of Representatives in the 1880s and 1890s.

In the United States the title “czar” is a slang term for certain high-level civil servants, such as the “drug czar” for the director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy, “terrorism czar” for a Presidential advisor on terrorism policy, “cybersecurity czar” for the highest-ranking Department of Homeland Security official on computer security and information security policy, and “war czar” to oversee the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. More specifically, a czar refers to a sub-cabinet level advisor within the executive branch of the U.S. government.

Under the political term explanation page, WikiPedia states the following:

Rationale:

Advantages cited for the creation of czar type posts are the ability to go outside of formal channels and find creative solutions for ad hoc problems, the ability to involve a lot of government players in big issue decision-making, and the ability to get a huge bureaucracy moving in the right direction. Problems can occur with getting all the parties to work together and with managing competing power centers.

One explanation for use of the term is that while the American public rebels at terms like “king” and “dictator”, associating them with King George III or fascist figures of World War II, the term “czar” is foreign, distant, and exotic enough to be acceptable. And the fact that czar positions are often created in times of perceived public crisis makes the public eager to see a strong figure making hard decisions that the existing political structure is unable to do.[6] Another is that Americans of the era adopted exotic Asian words to denote those with great, and perhaps unchecked, power, with “mogul” and “tycoon” being other instances.

The increase in czar positions over time may be because as the size and role of the federal government has grown, so too has the difficulty of coordinating policy across multiple organizational jurisdictions. Indeed, czar positions sometimes become important enough that they become permanent executive offices, such as the Office of National Drug Control Policy or the United States Trade Representative.

Wow! So how many Czars do we have now?

Well, buckle your seatbelts… for in July of 2009, The Daily Citizen reported that:

“It has taken President Barack Obama less than eight months to do what imperial Russia could not do in 400 years.

“Taxpayers for Common Sense reports that: Obama has appointed 31 “czars.” That’s more than ruled Russia during its entire imperial history.


“Obama has appointed a California water czar, a Mideast peace czar and a Mideast policy czar, a pay czar (to determine how much the private sector should pay, not the government), a health care czar, an energy czar and a green jobs czar, a Sudan czar, a climate change czar and numerous others, with the promise of more to come. And, if you can’t keep track of all the czars, don’t worry. Obama has also appointed an information czar.

“… Few of these czars require any congressional approval, but Obama has given many of them power over cabinet-level officials who are subject to confirmation.

(Source: The Daily Citizen –  http://www.northwestgeorgia.com/opinion/local_story_189163602.html?keyword=topstory)

Steve Forbes is quoted while speaking about Czars:

“It underscores the inefficiency of government that you keep … having people, hoping that maybe they will get something done that the massive government bureaucracy cannot.”

(Source: “Questions Raised Over Influence of Obama ‘Czars'”. Fox News. July 13, 2009. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/07/13/questions-raised-influence-obama-czars/)

So who is paying these “Czars” salaries?

Why the taxpayers of course!

How much power do these Czars actually have?

Good question… As stated by the Daily Citizen above:

Few of these czars require any congressional approval, but Obama has given many of them power over cabinet-level officials who are subject to confirmation.

So much apparent power do these Czars have, that Rep. Jack Kingston [Republican-GA] introduced a bill – H.R. 3226: Czar Accountability and Reform (CZAR) Act of 2009 – on July 15, 2009. Apparently this bill is so important to the members of the House of Representatives that it currently has 116 co-sponsors, all of them Republican. The one co-sponsor that was a Democrat was withdrawn at some point. When the whole of the Republican Party, including my personal hero Ron Paul supports a bill, which would reign in the Democratic President and party, one should not take such legislation lightly. The same would be true in opposite party circumstances. See the contents of the bill here:

(http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-3226)

The main concern here, one that is generally lost on the American people, is that these Czars are appointed without Congressional or Senate approval by one person: the President Of The United States. This alone should be enough to warrant extreme caution about the man who is for all intents and purposes in charge of our country (or more correctly: the man who signs the legislation and corrupt laws in the stead of lobbyists and wealthy elite bankers and corporations who funded his campaign and are incrementally taking control of our country). For the appointment of these men and women, of whom many have considerably tarnished and controversial political, economic, populist, and global oriented views, is a violation of the governmental and constitutional values we once held so dear to our hearts.

President Obama continues to keep in place and head the advice of such Czars as Paul Holdren – the “science czar” who co-wrote the book Ecoscience – “which proposed and supported such ideals as “compulsory sterilization,” and the creation of a “Planetary Regime” that would oversee human population levels and control all natural resources as a means of protecting the planet.” (infowars.com). Strangely, these ideals were not brought to light in Holdren’s Senate confirmation hearings. Unfortunately, this begs the assumption that the Senate is equally complicate in the appointment and support of these Czars, whether they are approved or not.

In conclusion, Obama appears to be out of control! While the gullible masses who support him are still admonishing him as the Savior of America, his empty promises of “hope and change” continue to ring – like a false Liberty Bell, whose crack is ever-widening and is about to break in half, along with this now condemned and nearly broken country. These Czars are the specters of false prophets; ghouls who resemble the character portrayal of Worm-tongue from the Lord of the Rings trilogy. And I for one am sickened by the ill-boded direction our electorate has taken towards the support of these tyrannical and unconstitutional, unelected rulers.

Quite frankly, the words of a fictional but oh so relevant news anchor perhaps best suit the stance we should all be taking towards the president and these unelected psychopaths who advise him…

I’m mad as hell, and I’m not going to take it anymore!

.

Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
October 5, 2009

The California Water Museum – Featuring The Fluoride Deception


As I was moving out of state in July of 2009, I was driving up Interstate 5’s long uphill grade where I saw an exit and a sign saying “Pyramid Lake”. It was the middle of summer and extremely hot. Since I was in an exploratory mood with nothing but time on my hands, I decided to exit the highway and see the lake. It turned out to be a rather large reservoir that feeds the Los Angeles area. A sign pointed to a visitor’s center and I parked there. Nice view… I walked in to the center to find out about camping around the lake, and was surprised to see that the building housed what was a water themed museum. I approached the guard at the information desk and he gave me an information sheet and directions to the lake’s campground.

Out of curiosity I looked around the museum, corny as it was. For the most part, it was an exhibit explaining to me the amount of water and energy it takes to do just about everything I do in my everyday life; even how much water I waste by filling up my gas tank up with petrol. I was not amused. The atmosphere was what you might call liberal… and by liberal I mean full of propaganda and half-truths that are designed to make its visitors feel guilty for being alive and to accept the fact that water is being used for political gain and prophet through taxation at their expense… and of course that this is a good thing for the environment. The placards and hands-on installations displayed to me in horrifying illustrative and picture oriented detail (perhaps taking into consideration the high illiteracy rate in the country) how the water supply is in crisis. I was sure that none of the museums’ visitors actually stop to think about the government and its lobbying corporate partners in crime (which stand to reap huge rewards from this tyrannical water rationing and taxation) and how they created this water crisis for their monetary gains. War, war on drugs, war on terror, war on poverty, war on water… What’s next, a war on war?

What I did learn is that most of the water that flows to southern California which does not come from the Colorado River actually comes from the northern most mountainous areas of the state. It is redirected through an aqueduct system down through the whole of California. Since most of its population lives on or near the ocean line, the water is diverted to all of those cities. It is passed on to farms and ranches and smaller cities that pay for this state contracted water delivery service as well. Without this aqueduct system, Los Angeles and the rest of the cities and farmlands that are, for all intents and purposes part of the desert, would not be able to exist. It’s a fascinating accomplishment… a true story of man -vs- nature, where man doesn’t understand the impact on nature until it’s too late. Dams be damned, I say.

As I finished walking through the adult oriented yet child-like museum, I walked to the front doors preparing to leave, feeling a bit yucky. To the right of the glass doors was a display case showing other parks where I might be able to camp. I grabbed a few of the brochures and then noticed a poorly photocopied, double-sided blue sheet of paper in the corner of the display. The title had my name all over it:

Fluoridation… At A Glance.

Underneath the title was a black and white picture of several small children drinking water from a public drinking fountain. This disturbed me, as children are a tool often used in politics and advertising, usually in a deceiving way. Under that heartwarming picture was a list of the dental benefits of fluoride, as well as a quote by the U.S. Surgeon General, which stated that:

“Community water fluoridation continues to be the most cost-effective, practical and safe means for reducing and controlling the occurrence of tooth decay in a community.”

What a dick! How does he sleep at night? Does he let his children drink this rat poison?

In the ‘About Fluoride’ section, it deceivingly stated:

“Fluoride is a naturally occurring mineral found in surface water (water from snowmelt, rivers, and streams) as well as ground water.”

It also had this bit of info, which was another affront to my senses:

“Fluoride helps teeth resist decay by strengthening the protective layer of tooth enamel, and can reverse newly formed cavities.”

What a crap basket! From what information I’ve read, the stuff causes bone density loss and osteoporosis. And since teeth are essentially bones…

More disturbing was the next statement that:

“Of the 50 largest cities in the United States 43 fluoridate their drinking water.”

Now… at the bottom of the page, still in the ‘About Fluoride’ section, were these two paragraphs:

“While exposure to fluoride can cause dental fluorosis, most cases in communities with optimally fluoridated water are very mild and characterized by barely visible white opaque spots on the teeth.”

“The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has not recognized claims that low-level fluoride exposure is linked to occurrences ——“

—– At that point the page was cut off! Was this an innocent mistake? I wonder. I’m guessing no. But it’s possible. I guess thinking that this was not deliberate would be called… hope.

I stood there for a moment, battling a flush of political correctness, not wanting to disturb the museum’s natural flow (pun intended). But lately, causing a scene has become my favorite pastime. I did a 180 and headed back towards the information desk. An official tour guide for the center was talking to a nice lady in her very late 50’s (maybe that’s being nice) who at one time, judging by her appearance and demeanor, must have been related to the peace and love movement. She was simply delighted at what the federally employed man was saying, and was listening intently. He (the tour guide) was a bit creepy, confident in a way that only the most ignorant and misinformed of people could be, and as unhealthy looking as most Americans appear to be these days.

I listened from across the desk patiently as he pointed to a map of California and explained how it all worked. He told the woman about water rationing and how only certain cities were actually metered, demonizing the bad people of these water suckling metropolis’. She smiled and chastised out loud that whole horrid Southern California populace, as if their use of water was less justified than hers, considering the equivalent source.

At one point, after a 5-minute history of metering in certain counties, she said intently, “I think everybody should be metered.” He smiled malevolently. It was like watching a salesman fish in a buyer, playing off of her insecurities and lack of knowledge. I just shook my head in disgust for most of the conversation, but respectfully refrained from interrupting.

The creepy guide went on… “Well, (pause for grin) soon all houses will have a meter which can be read digitally from the central station, and shut off if too much water is being used.”

At hearing this, her reply was just short of exuberance. “Oh, that’s just wonderful! There are so many wasteful people out there.”

Now, at this point I had to interrupt. I now understand what Alex Jones (infowars.com) means when he goes on one of his rants about people and how they love their tyranny, carbon taxes, and debt slavery. And also, I must give credit to Aldus Huxley for predicting many decades ago that people could eventually be made to love their servitude. She was truly exited to give up her rights. It all made sense to her in a simple way…

“Wait a minute,” I said in a slightly confrontational voice. “That’s tyranny! Surely you can’t want to be metered and taxed for your right to use water” She looked at me then, confused, possibly only noticing me for the first time. I looked at the tour guide then, and the smile slowly went away from the pushers face.

Silence…

I can really kill a room!

I asked them both if they had heard of the bill in congress that would give control of all water rights in the entire country to the Federal Government – (S. 787 – Clean Water Restoration Act). More blank stares and a cringe of hostility in the tour guide. I directed a short tirade of information towards the woman, who had a sudden look of something I couldn’t quite place, but which I guessed was the first time in a long time that she had thought for herself, outside the media box. It was an expression of the sudden responsibility of ones self, and of brief enlightenment that usually comes and goes quickly with these green, well intentioned, but ultimately brain-washed cult-environmentalist people.

By then, the salesman knew he was losing her, as if an invisible umbilical chord had been cut, and so I turned my attention to him.

“I’d like to ask a question about the Fluoridation of the water supply.” I said. He looked harshly at me, perhaps disturbed that one of the visitors to his place of worship should question the religion of water fluoridation treatment. But somehow, I don’t think I was the first to ask.

He said ‘ok’ in a regrettable way. The slave-lady was still listening, a confused look on her face. She probably thought I was a nut! I gave the brochure to her so she could follow along.

“Tell me this…” I said. “If fluoride is good for my teeth, why then is it put into the water supply to be swallowed and ingested? I mean, Fluoride is one of the most poisonous substances known to man. It’s in rat poison, and it’s the by-product of the aluminum industry. So why do we drink something that’s actually only supposed to be good for our teeth?”

His eyes visibly widened, and he paused a second before letting out a big guffaw. He laughed nervously and tried to regain his composure.

His response… “Well, everything is bad for you if you use too much of it.”

I eyed him with my bullshit meter, not knowing exactly where this was going. “Go on…” I invited.

“Look, if you drink too much water you can drown yourself. So you could say that water is bad for you just like fluoride—“

“What?” I interrupted, angered at his treating me like his usual dumbed down hive-minded idiots. “That’s the most ridiculous association I’ve ever heard! Fluoride was used in concentration camps to make prisoners compliant and calm. What does that have to do with moderation? Why are so many U.S. cities passing legislation against water fluoridation?

Why did most of Europe abolish the use of fluoride in their water supply?”

At this point, the wild-eyed green lady walked away with brochure in hand. She was not ready for this kind of antagonism towards her social religion. But I did hope that she was curious enough to at least look into the other side of the story, and not just trust that her government was doing what’s best for her and her family. She didn’t say thank you… or goodbye.

After about ten minutes of bantering with the tour guide, his sole defense being the fact that I could drink too much water and die (or anything else for that matter) and that science had proven the benefits of fluoride for teeth (guffaw), he was not quite able to grasp the fact that ingestion is quite different than application, and that the warnings on toothpaste tubes that say ‘DO NOT SWALLOW’ are there for a reason, and that no dentist in his right mind would drink even a quarter of a thimble full of pure fluoride.
I wrote down a movie title on a piece of paper. It was “The Fluoride Deception’, a very damning explanation of the fluoride industry and it’s damaging effects on everything it touches. I asked him to watch it some time. He said he’d think about it.

I asked him to watch it on the computer behind him. He refused, sighting work regulations and rules.

I suggested he watch it on his break, since it was only a half an hour long. He was visibly red in the face by then, and said something unintelligible about the restrictions with that computers bandwidth.

I asked him if he would actually watch it later, and he answered ‘If I have time’.

I smiled wryly, and asked him to promise me that he’d watch it later. He then got mad, and gave me excuses why he wouldn’t be able to watch it, none that were legitimate.

My final comments were that he couldn’t do his job correctly without knowing all of the information available, and that he was doing a disservice to his visitors by not looking into fluoride. Short of getting on my knees, I actually begged him to watch it. He made it clear then that we would never see eye to eye and that I should be on my way. Feeling suddenly unwelcome in this house of worship, I pleaded for him to watch it as I walked out the door and to my truck.

What a shill.

Interestingly though, during our banter he did give me a card with the person in charge of such things and asked me to send her the information. Of course when I asked if they would post it for people to read, he lied through his fluorosis stained teeth and gave me an unconvincing and pacifying ‘maybe’.

I sent her an email with the movie link and a few questions, but received no reply.

Some day, I hope to get back to Southern California and actually hand the center a stack of homemade brochures which state all of the facts about fluoride, where it comes from, and who actually approved it’s use for human consumption.

Perhaps I could call it: “Fluoride… More Than a Glance.

If you’d like to know more about fluoride and its effects on your body and mental health functions, click here and watch “The Fluoride Deception”.

Authors note: Most bottled water is bottled from public water sources, which are pre-fluoridated before these water companies ever get their hands on it. The filtration methods these companies use are not sufficient to get this toxin out of the water before it is bottled. Some even add fluoride after filtration for “health reasons”. Spring water is from about as fresh of a source as your toilet bowl – and you thought your dog had bad taste! Most of the bottled water brands were created or bought by big corporations, and labeled in a way to fool you into thinking they are independent companies. Many have been sued and lost, forcing them to label the true water source. Some end up in discount stores or the dollar stores and are there for a reason… buy these at your peril. Don’t be a sheep. Read the labels. Look at the source. Buy responsibly.

The following is a list of some of the more popular bottled water brands, and the mega-corporations who produce them:

Arrowhead – The Nestle’ Corporation

Poland Spring – The Nestle’ Corporation

Perrier
– The Nestlé Corporation.

San Pellegrino (Perrier’s competitor) – The Nestle’ Corporation

Calistoga – The Nestle’ Corporation

Crystal Gyser – The Nestle’ Corporation

Ice Mountain – The Nestle’ Corporation

Zephyr Hills – The Nestle’ Corporation

Ozarka – The Nestle’ Corporation

Pure Life/Pureza Vital – The Nestle’ Corporation

Deer Park – The Nestle’ Corporation

Aquapod – The Nestle’ Corporation

Nestle’ Brand – The Nestle’ Corporation

Dasani – The Coca-cola Company

Glacéau – The Coca-cola Company

Vitamin Water
– The Coca-cola Company

Smart Water
– The Coca-cola Company

Oasis – The Coca-cola Company

Ciel – The Coca-Cola Company

Aquafina – The PepsiCo Corporation

Propel – The PepsiCo Corporation

Evian (Naïve)
– The Danone Group – a large French multinational company.

Volvic – The Danone Group

Fiji – Stewart and Lynda Resnick aquired Fiji in 2004, pumping the “green” angle.

Ethos – Bought by Starbuck’s Coffee Corporation in 2005
.
.

… So which one do you drink, my little sheep?

Are you feeling suckered yet… a victim of clever advertising perhaps?

.

Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
September 28, 2009

Derivatives and Leverages and Bubbles, Oh My!


Perhaps you have questions on what these financial tools are and how they caused the many “crisis” which plague the world’s economies and ours. I did too. Now I have some answers… but you might not like them.

————————————————————————————————————

Q. What is a derivative?

A. A derivative is a word that describes a root word, such as sub in submarine. ‘Sub’ is the root word and ‘sub-marine’ is the derivative. A derivative is like a leech, it can’t exist without a host.

So, a sub-prime real estate loan is the derivative form of a real estate loan.

In general, a derivative is not a real asset. Examples of real assets are: stocks, bonds, cash, and real estate. A derivative, as its name suggests, is a financial tool that only attains value through the value of something else. It’s a speculation on future values. In other words, derivatives are a kind of side bet on whether or not real assets will be worth more in the future than at their current value. If you lose money on a derivative bet, someone else generally gains – since they bet the opposite of you. If the government loses this bet, the taxpayers ultimately pay the difference. This is the shell game constantly being played by our financial leaders, with no regulation and no actual real assets to back these bets up. In other words, when the government loses this future derivative bet, they just ask the Federal Reserve Bank to print up more worthless paper money (done digitally) of which the debt burden of this ‘Monopoly Money” gets passed on to the taxpayer (who pay for the principle and interest of the losses). And the game continues, on and on and on…

Example: If the United States agrees to pay $60 per barrel of oil in 6 months time with Saudi Arabia, no matter what the actual price will be in 6 months time, there are three possibilities with regards to profit and loss for this future value bet:

  • The current price in 6 months equals $60. Neither country profits or looses money.
  • The current price in 6 months goes up to $70. Saudi Arabia looses $10 per barrel.
  • The current price in 6 months goes down to $50. The United States looses $10 per barrel.

I read somewhere that the value of these derivatives are on average three times the actual value of the assets they are predicated upon. This means that two-thirds the value of a derivative is pure speculation. Therefore, coffee futures are three times the value of the underlying coffee, being a projection (or prediction) of the coffee’s future value. The inherent problem with this is that values don’t always go up, so huge or total losses can easily take place in betting on future derivatives prices.
In general, derivatives are not part of the GDP, or Gross Domestic Product, since they cannot be accounted for until a future date. Thus, losses and gains can be hidden from the public until the next financial earnings report the following quarter or year.

Derivatives losses, since they can be written off (to taxpayers) and since these bankers have virtually unlimited reserve monies to play with, are what has caused the so-called “financial crisis”. The bundling of these derivative sub-prime mortgages into AAA rated stocks (different parts of many different real estate loans get bundled together on paper to equal one stock or asset) was a dirty trick played on all of us, as the bankers ultimately knew that these derivative sub-prime real estate loans would by necessity be defaulted on, since the payments for these loans would eventually exceed the income of the borrowers as the interest rates jumped according to the sub-prime contracts, and the falsely propped up prices in the real estate markets had to drop (or correct themselves) back to somewhat realistic values, meaning that the loans would be more than the actual property is worth.

Deregulation of the banking industry and the letting go of these regulators – persons whose job it was to ensure these types of loans could not be given to people who could not afford them – was one root cause of this planned fiasco. There were no accidents here. This was a premeditated attack on the dollar and the economy of the United States. For while these banks and the large corporate sponsors of these derivatives get “bailed out” by our president and legislature (who receives funding and kickbacks through lobby’s and future contracts, stock options, and future appointments (jobs) with said corporations) – or more accurately by the taxpayers and the future generations who will pay for these bailouts – the taxpayers get no such recompense.

The fact that all home mortgages in the United States could have been paid off for much less than the amount of money that was given in the form of “bailouts” to mortgage companies, much of which went to foreign banks, is the ultimate sign that our country is being run by the most heinously corrupt clan of conspirators in history, and will very likely be the downfall of our beloved country.

Guess who the largest contributors to the Obama campaign were?

You guessed it… the banks that received the “bailouts”.

————————————————————————————————————

Q. What is a bubble?

A. A bubble is when prices of real assets or derivatives are severely over priced or artificially inflated, meaning that the actual value is much less than the current prices. This is usually caused by fictitious hype about a market or product, its location, its future worth, and other false predictive values. In other words, the government, corporations, banks, or brokers lie about their assets’ value in order to reap profits on unsuspecting investors.

In the real estate market, this means the price of the homes in an area are too high, with nothing real to back up their value. A house in Los Angeles that costs $1.2 million might sell for $120,000 in Idaho. But a simple overdue 8.0 earthquake would remedy that discrepancy in the blink of an eye. A castle set on 100 acres of land in Utah might be worth the same as a small 1-bedroom apartment in Manhattan overlooking Central Park. Pray for no earthquakes or typhoons here!

With the dot-com bubble, it meant that speculation on the future value of these virtual businesses were eventually shown to be false, and that the stock prices dropped or “corrected” themselves to the actual value – or just failed altogether. Though stupendous profits can be made on the way up, most investors will always eventually lose the game as the price drops below what was paid for the asset at its peak performance. Thus, the “bubble” is said to be deflated, or popped.

Again, there is nothing accidental about this type of market fluctuation and correction. The Federal Reserve and their partner banks and corporations with help from the misleading media are always in control of inflation and deflation, supply and demand. The knowledge of these types of bubbles and how and when they will pop is not an unknown entity. Nothing happens by accident in the stock market or the futures markets.

Bubbles are blown up and snuffed by these bankers, usually after they abandon their market shares.

————————————————————————————————————

Q. What does it mean to leverage something?

A. To leverage something (like money) you would basically be borrowing something in the hopes or expectation of making more of that thing in the future. In the case of money, you would take on debt by borrowing money at interest and then using that money, say in the stock market, to purchase assets (stocks). If the stock goes up in value more than the interest you must pay on the original debt, you have leveraged that money to make a profit.

Even more simple to understand: if you could borrow the same money at 5% interest and then invest that money in a bond or CD (basically a virtually no risk investment – you hope.) which would return 10% guaranteed, you are leveraging that debt and making 5% profit without even making an effort.

So, let’s take a look at how banks leverage your money – the money you stow away in your savings account for a rainy day:

Let’s say every month you put $100 into you’re savings account, and are being paid 5% interest on your money (peanuts, really).

How can the bank afford to do that?Well, the bank takes you’re money and will invest it in loans, credit, funds, or other riskier and higher yield investments. Let’s say that bank makes an average of a 15% return on yours and everyone else’s savings account money before it pays all of you your share (5%). Well, the bank has just borrowed (leveraged) your money in order to make 10% profits on your money. So while you feel like you are getting a fair but quite meager return on your so-called “safe” investment (your stagnant savings account), the bank is actually risking your money to make money of its own, and letting you have a small portion as an incentive to keep saving – depositing more money into your account for the bank to leverage. This is why they can pay you that measly 5% interest.

And, this is why I despise the banking industry!

These bankers are really making money off of your unwillingness to take a risk with your own hard-earned money. Of course, they reinforce this fear and make the whole system as confusing as possible through red tape, fine print, and the media so that you are kept in the dark about this process.

The expression “Time is money” is the most true statement ever made in the financial world. And so, if you can leverage your time, making money while you sleep, then you are way ahead of the game.

A business owner who hires workers to produce goods, which will in turn make more money for the owner, is leveraging his time. Throw in a manager who runs the shop for even more leverage. He pays a percentage of the profits of these products to the workers and to the manager, while he can be doing other things… like setting up another business with the profits from the first (leveraging the initial leveraged money), or sipping a cocktail at the beach (making money while he sleeps). If this operation runs smoothly, his time is leveraged 100% since he never even needs to set foot in his shop. The same could be done on the Internet, where manufacturing, sales, and shipping are all done virtually from home – or are leveraged through an Internet company. This leveraging of time is the most important lesson in business you can learn. Without it, we’d have nothing but the working class.

Now we come once again to the government…

These guys leverage huge amounts of money, and the only risk is to the taxpayer. We as taxpayers are easily trained to just keep paying our illegitimate taxes. And if the money is lost, they just ask the Fed to print up some more out of thin air… but we have to pay the bill. The taxpayers are somewhat like the aforementioned workers in this respect, which keep on working to pay for, or leverage the governments gambling habit. We as citizens are all leveraged as collateral since we keep producing revenue in the form of taxes, and since we pay for the interest attached to the new money that is printed up by the Federal Reserve when the bets are lost. In other words, we pay triple taxes: once for the original investment, once again for new printed money to cover in bad investment (which makes someone a profit since that money doesn’t just disappear), and once again over time for interest owed on both sets of monies. Profits however, never seem to get redistributed to the real investors: the people of the United States who pay their taxes under a false sense of duty, never even realizing that any of these taxes (especially the income tax) goes towards the services they would expect them to, and instead goes almost exclusively to pay off the national debt (to the Federal Reserve Bank, which is a group of private international bankers that operate above the law and completely outside of the control of our government, the president, the legislature, and the taxpayers who supply it).

And so this is how your government operates: controlled by the bankers who lend it money at interest.

————————————————————————————————————

Bonus Q. What is Zionism?

A. Zionists are the bad guys of the Jewish community. They are Jews who occupy and support the “State of Israel” and who commit heinous human rights violations and crimes against Palestine. They are in the middle of a genocidal campaign against the Palestinians who rightfully live on the land the Zionist Jews are incrementally stealing from them with the support of the United States government, and have been for many years since the inception of the State of Israel. Zionists are the group of Jews who tried to destroy the economy of Germany in the 1930’s by attempting a boycott of the entire countries exports. Zionists allowed and even encouraged the Orthodox Jews be persecuted in their place during WW2. Zionists lie about the supposed 6.5 million Jews who were killed in concentration camps at the hands of the Nazis, even though there weren’t that many Jews around to kill. And Zionists are the ones, along with the ADL (Anti-Defamation League) who will call me an anti-Semite for daring to tell the truth here. Many have died trying to do this. The main difference between Orthodox Jews and the Zionist Jews is simple: Orthodox Jews follow and believe in God, while the Zionist Jews have a distaste for this religion and its God. Zionism equals Godlessness according to the Orthodox Jews. Some Zionists have even admitted that Lucifer is their God (though they died quickly after). For more information on Zionism, one should read the ‘Protocols of Zion’ and the ‘Babylonian Talmud’, which essentially lays out their plans to take over America and the world. No, seriously! Though it sounds crazy, it’s not a joke when people say (Zionist) Jews own Hollywood, the banking industry, the Federal Reserve, etc… they aren’t kidding. You must understand the control this small group has over the American economy and its presidents, its legislature, and even over the Christian community to fully understand the trouble we are in as a nation and how this group has been subverting ours and other cultures for so many years. (SEE: Christians United For Israel – CUFI.com). Billions and billions of our tax dollars are given to Israel each year. Though they are armed with nuclear weapons, they are the only country not signed on to the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, even as we chastise Iran for this. Iran has no weapons with nuclear capabilities of course, and incidentally they are the sworn enemy of Israel and the Zionist Jews. We (America) sell them weapons and aircraft… new, deadly aircraft. These are the planes, illegal bombs, and weapons that kill the Palestinians, and that they threaten Iran with and to “take the whole world down with them”. Without this massive funding by America, the state of Israel would not exist. When the Israeli flag is displayed next to the American flag in the Oval Office, and the president’s chief of staff is a duel Israeli-American citizen whose father is linked to real foreign Israeli terrorist groups, you surely must recognize that something sinister is going on here. They are the great deceivers. This transcends bigotry. There is no prejudice or so-called anti-Semitism in this rant. If you had asked me ‘what is a tick?’, I would have had the same repulsion to that blood-sucking insect which attaches on and won’t let go as I now do towards this extreme manipulative group; who again are not to be confused with the majority of good Orthodox Jews. They are not the same, at all, in the least! Zionists are the bankers! Zionists are the destroyers of our country. Learn the truth before it’s too late…

Here is a good documentary, which explains this situation very well. Watch if you dare… for when you see the influence these Zionists have over American politics and foreign affairs it will shock the hell out of you, even as you watch every elected acting president we’ve had in the last 20 years wearing a little Jewish hat while praying at the Wailing Wall:

http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=2B116B08D179CD5A&search_query=the+khazarian+conspir

Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
September 26, 2009

Death Control + Birth Control = Out Of Balance.


I am not sure who invented the medical procedure known today as the abortion. I am sure that whoever sells it is a merchant of death, profiting from the taking of or halting the beginning of a new life.

I am also not sure who invented the horrific asylum known as the convalescent home. But I am sure that whomever sells it’s services is profiting from the unnecessary and prolonged misery and suffering of the most vulnerable and helpless in our society.

These are heavy concepts. I would even be so bold as to say they are evil, for whatever that means. But to understand how they correlate to each other is an even more sinister and heavy perception. This strangely silent requiem of forced premature death juxtaposed with compulsory forced misery and life is what I would like to discuss here.

It is a staggering contradiction. We unnaturally prolong the lives of the elderly, the overly mature, the sickest of adults, and even our ill-stricken children to the point of causing misery and suffering to the person in question as well as the friends and family around them, both emotionally and financially. It is an industry built on our obligatorily learned group acceptance of this notion of extended suffering and unnaturally prolonged life. At the same time, a whole industry has been embraced as acceptable and even necessary, which creates just as much pain and suffering. We suck out, chemically exterminate, or surgically remove healthy young fetus’ as if they were a tumor, all in the name of birth control and convenience. Thus we are now unnaturally ending a life before it ever gets the chance to experience what life is even about, while prolonging the unnatural lifespan of those whose lives should be naturally ending.

I’ve tried to wrap my head around this social order of things, but cannot. Is it greed? Is it profit? Is it population control? Is it a general lack of reason, logic or education? Has the natural responsibility to nurture and care for our loved ones, our parents, and even our unborn children been completely lost on our generation?

Greed… Do I want to live forever? Frankly no, I do not. Do I want my mother and father to live forever? I love them, but no. Old age and death is nature’s way of instituting that old saying… ‘Out with the old and in with the new.’ All things that have a beginning must as well have an end. It is the natural order of all life. Life is only possible through birth. Adaptation, or changing with the times is not evolution, just change. God (or nature) is everything, yet everything dies and a new version is born again. So why do we tamper with nature’s (or God’s) plan? Well, greed or selfishness is the first thing that comes to mind. Be it siblings who keep their parents alive even when they are permanently unconscious or comatose, in severe and unending pain and misery, or even against their will… greed or selfishness must be the root cause. Not wanting someone to die is an understandably selfish, extremely emotional response. However, knowing someone must die when their natural time has come is an intellectually advanced, intuitional and empathetically loving comprehension. Yet for most modern people, the unloving emotion is the more powerful of the two competing energies. The fact is that the ‘care’ industry exploits us all to make huge profits from prolonging life unnaturally. And the Medicare and Medicaid insurance structures are simply government funded pyramid schemes, which allow this industry to thrive by encouraging this sickening but profitable commerce to take place: prolonged misery for profit. The same can be said about the industry that promotes and conducts abortion as birth control, a similar yet opposite phenomenon. While we have an entire industry based on prolonging life unnaturally, so too do we have an equally appalling medical field based solely on prematurely ending it, with funding and donations coming from so-called “philanthropic organizations” and “environmental groups” whose real hidden agenda is depopulation and eugenics (See: Gates Foundation, Warren Buffet, Ted Turner, multiple United Nations funds, Rockefellers, Rothschilds, The Ford Foundation, etc… all of whom donate to and support this cause). The idea of keeping someone alive in a permanent state of coma with no hope of recovery compiled with the financial burden that this creates, while at the same time understanding that new lives are being ended before they ever even begin – for many reasons (not the least of which is financial) – is a mind-numbing, sickening, paradoxical perception I just cannot comprehend. That is unless I attach greed and profit to the equation. A lack of compassion and empathy combined with the money made by forced misery and the slaughter of innocents has turned the medical industry into what can only be translated as a death cult.

Reason and logic… Is it reasonable to give up your newborn baby because you know you cannot take care of it? Yes, I believe adoption is a perfectly viable solution for this situation. Is it reasonable to be irresponsible with your sexual behavior, get pregnant, and then terminate that pregnancy through abortion as a form of birth control? For me, the answer is wholeheartedly no. Though I will always hold a banner that says I am pro-choice, this does not mean I am for abortion… as if vacuuming up a baby is something any sane person could be for. I am for many things: Constitutional rights, freedom of speech, owning a gun, and even the right to religious freedom – though organized religion is currently and historically the epitome of idiocracy, irresponsibility, intolerance, massacre, mass manipulation and control. In the case of abortion though, religion does seem to have it right, misguided and violent as the pro-life movement is. Pro-life would make abortion illegal, taking away the right to choose instead of accomplishing this end through education and peace. Pro-choice simply means the state of letting you make up your own mind, regardless of what myself or the majority of people may think. Abortion is your personal choice: a woman’s choice. This is a right that must (unfortunately) be protected: for the precedent of stripping anyone’s right to choice or self-determination will ultimately have nothing but the worst kind of consequences for the precious rights we still cling to as a sovereign people. And never believe that a darkly veiled campaign to systematically strip Americans of their constitutional rights is not taking place at the highest levels in this country (just read the Patriot Acts and United Nations documents on world government and the destruction of country and state sovereignty).

I would suggest here that it is not reasonable or logical to keep one person alive in misery or against their will, while simultaneously keeping another person from being born and experiencing this beautiful life. And to put so many resources towards prolonging life and misery at the expense of younger generations, who as a consequence receive lower wages than their fathers did, and who cannot even receive or afford health care or medical insurance, is ludicrous, unreasonable, and completely illogical – unless again we place profit into the equation.

Education… So too is an individuals level of education a choice, and what one does with and how one acts upon information is again their personal choice. As a former student in all grades, college, and trade schools… may I just say that the education system in this country particularly sucks! It has been intentionally dumbed down over many years in order to perpetuate the lack of common sense, logic, critical thinking, financial wisdom, civics, government, history and general knowledge… and replaced with multiple choice, non-deductible reasoning, one-choice only answers, and what amounts to work labor and paper-pusher training camps for the masses. It officially ranks below some third world countries. At some point recently, the undereducated (or re-educated) became the parents, and then the grandparents and great-grandparents, until eventually the maternal instincts and knowledge passed down for hundreds of generations has been wiped out of the equation with the defamation and death of pre-industrial generations. Thus it stands to reason that parents can no longer teach their children what the school system fails to ingrain, as they themselves were never ethically taught by their parents or through school. In fact if one looks below the surface, it is quite obvious that the purposeful severing of family influence over children in favor of state and public school “curriculum” and re-education has taken place. Going full circle, it also only stands to reason that teen and unwed pregnancy, with abortion as the socially acceptable solution, is way out of control and has become for the most part, normal conditions in trying times. What is the new tool for education? Television. Movies. Magazines. Video games. In these, women are portrayed as stronger and smarter than men. Men have been, for lack of a better term, ‘pussified’ and feminized. Cultural differences and racial antagonism are forced upon us. White people are constantly knocked down and inversely discriminated by all other races, and any white cultural significance has been purposely assimilated into all others or made trivial. “White men can’t jump”… Really? The crutch of slavery and the guilt of our white ancestors in its propagation are thrust into our psyches, even though it was whites that ran the Underground Railroad and fought with their lives for the abolition of slavery. The false portrayal of the Holocaust is continuously forced upon us, accusing all who question the impossible facts of it as anti-Semitic. Men are portrayed as buffoons who cannot get along without or relate to their female counterparts. White rappers: this does not compute! Nonsensical cultural nomenclature has replaced empirical data and historical fact. The scientific method has been usurped by Science Fiction; the encyclopedia trumped by Wikipedia. And Wikipedia – imagine, a resource written by dumbed down people for the rest of the dumbed down people, and then used as a source for factual information; information by which anyone can vote on the validity of its claim or change its very definitions to suit popular opinion. I call it popularized history and idolized fact. The advent and acceptance of this ridiculous website only serves to prove how logic, deduction, reason, and truth have been taken out of the educational equation. So… I suppose I shouldn’t be surprised that, through the hypnotism of the mass media and the new lack of traditional family support, abortion and the unnatural prolonging of life seem perfectly natural and acceptable to the average American educated in such a system of non-deductive learning. What ever happened to the shotgun wedding? Even the sacred burial ritual has been sideswiped by the sickening and eerily lucrative funeral home, open casket, cremation, and burial plot businesses.

“Hey bob, what ya gonna do with that land you bought over there?”

“Well… I thought I’d divide it up into little rectangles and sell it to future dead people, and then alter the laws to force people to bury their dead there.”

What we are facing here is a reversal of logic, and no one seems to want to talk about such uncomfortable, socially accepted things. Political correctness is as well a plague on this earth as is unchecked belief and faith, perpetrated by the media and accepted by the timid. We must not let its supporters interject against the necessity of the discussion of such things. Truth is not good or bad, it is just truth. What we do with that truth is ultimately what matters and defines us as individuals.

Birth control and death control are indeed out of balance. I believe the term birth control should no longer be used to describe abortion. At the same time, perhaps this new term: Death control should be debated, considered, and the two subjects compared with one another, side by side… if for no other reason than to ensure that extremes like forced abortion or forced euthanasia never grabs a foothold in this country like it has in others. Thanks to the Obama administration, the United Nations, a media blackout, and the lack of effort and empathy from the people of the United States – who either don’t know that their current president helped pass forced abortion in Africa through the United Nations, or just don’t care – the very real threat of this type of tyranny, like China’s one child policies and Africa’s forced abortion is nipping at the cusps of our society through United Nations sanctions. If you believe this can never happen here, you must have your head in the sand. If you don’t believe that what happens in other parts of the world is a direct result of what is decided by the elite in this country and in other wealthy nations through the United Nations, then the sand is waist deep.

No my friends, I am not suggesting we start killing old and sick people, nor am I suggesting we make abortion illegal. This is what you’ve been trained to revert to as a defense instead of thinking for yourself. It is not that cut and dry and life is just not that simple. I would however suggest that the belief in voluntary suicide by those in abject misery is bad or somehow wrong is ridiculous, and is just as selfish and controlling as forced life. Choice is the ultimate freedom, and we must all learn to cherish and protect this right – the individuals’ right to choose. Conversely, abortion is repugnant; so detestable that it should be shouted from the mountaintop. But the right to choose cannot be taken away. Abortion must be prevented. It starts with education, as in educating yourself and others about this sinister plan put into place by pro-eugenics groups to deceive and control us through the manipulation of our empathy and intuition. It takes realizing that more black or ‘African American’ babies are aborted than are actually born every year, and it will take white people breaking their cultural comfort zone and sharing this information with this purposefully subjugated and assaulted ethnic group, so that they know it comes not from all Caucasians, but only a handful of mostly white elites who consider themselves to be at the top of the evolutionary chain. We must bind together as individual ethnic groups to fight together as one, and not let these pragmatic few divide and conquer us though color or creed as they pit us against each other while they get away with murder and tyranny. It starts with realizing and exposing the evil nature of the now nearly unregulated health care and pharmaceutical industries, and in bringing this regulation back to the table. It starts with thinking… about why things are the way they are. It starts with exposing who supports the pro-abortion and depopulation movements. (Note: pro-abortion and pro-choice are not the same thing. Understanding this is very important.) It starts with love, loving someone and yourself enough to either let one die peacefully or to let a new life begin to live at all. It will take talking out loud to people you have nothing in common with, at parties and in coffee shops, even if they don’t want to hear it, and even if friends or family abandon you for your efforts. For after they hear it enough times from enough people, the next time might make the difference and break them out of their trance. And finally, it starts with smashing your television into thousands of tiny pieces, regaining your freedom of thought, and becoming a family again!

Check out the Obama administrations’ views on abortion – Obama’s first 100 days – here:

(http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2009/may/09050808.html)

And in conclusion, I leave you with a few quotes from your trusted, eugenicist leaders:

U.S. policy toward the third world should be one of depopulation.”  – Henry Kissinger, 1978

A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal…”  – Ted Turner

In order to save the planet it would be necessary to kill 350,000 people per day.”  – Jacques Cousteau, UNESCO (United Nations Education Science and Cultural Organization) Courier 1991

The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.”  -Margaret Sanger (founder of Planned Parenthood, which is funded by the Rockefellers and through foundations like the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation) – Mrs. Sanger is an admitted “mentor” to Hillary Clinton

We must speak more clearly about sexuality, contraception, about abortion, about values that control population, because the ecological crisis, in short, is the population crisis. Cut the population by 90% and there aren’t enough people left to do a great deal of ecological damage.”  -Mikhail Gorbachev

In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill… But in designating them as the enemy, we fall into the trap of mistaking symptoms for causes. All these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy, then, is humanity itself.”  – Club of Rome, The First Global Revolution, 1991 (this seems to be proof that man made global warming is a lie)

Society has no business to permit degenerates to reproduce their kind… Any group of farmers, who permitted their best stock not to breed, and let all the increase come from the worst stock, would be treated as fit inmates for an asylum… Some day we will realize that the prime duty, the inescapable duty of the good citizens of the right type is to leave his or her blood behind him in the world; and that we have no business to permit the perpetuation of citizens of the wrong type. The great problem of civilization is to secure a relative increase of the valuable as compared with the less valuable or noxious elements in the population… The problem cannot be met unless we give full consideration to the immense influence of heredity…” “I wish very much that the wrong people could be prevented entirely from breeding; and when the evil nature of these people is sufficiently flagrant, this should be done. Criminals should be sterilized and feeble minded persons forbidden to leave offspring behind them… The emphasis should be laid on getting desirable people to breed…– Theodore Roosevelt – Charles B. Davenport Papers, Department of Genetics, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.

Either they [governments] do it our way, through nice clean methods or they will get the kind of mess that we have in El Salvador, or in Iran, or in Beirut. Population is a political problem. Once population is out of control it requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to reduce it. “The professionals,” said Ferguson, “aren’t interested in lowering population for humanitarian reasons. That sounds nice. We look at resources and environmental constraints. We look at our strategic needs, and we say that this country must lower its population -or else we will have trouble. So steps are taken. El Salvador is an example where our failure to lower population by simple means has created the basis for a national security crisis. The government of El Salvador failed to use our programs to lower their population. Now they get a civil war because of it… There will be dislocation and food shortages. They still have too many people there.– David Rockefeller, Co-founder of the Trilateral Commission: (1981)

Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)

September 26, 2009