How Elections Really Work


 

The presidential debates were on last night at a freinds and somehow I was compelled to listen to the disingenuous debauchery. Basically, eight or so bullshit artists stood in what was no debate at all. For a debate would have purposefully caused each candidate to pick a side and explain and defend that side whether they liked it or not or agreed with that side or not. That’s debate. But all this turned out to be was a god-building exercise designed to promote a cult of droll personality and promote the mythos of American dreamism.

My friend’s father was visiting, and naturally he asked me half way through who I would vote for, fully caught up in the hopium of a new figurehead. Now imagine how many thoughts raced through my mind in that second or two before I answered. With respect, I said its not my government, its theirs. We don’t vote for president. It’s all a lie. It’s us against them.

And just as I’d expect, a silent, cognitive dissonance set in and we continued to watch.

Same question a few minutes later…

Same honest, factual answer.

And the logical fallacy of a retort:

“But we have to have a president!”

“We have to vote for somebody!”

I explained as I always do trying to live and speak every day in Reality that we do not elect the president, the electors do, and that our franchised “vote” is more like a pole, a survey of public opinion, used merely in a popularity contest between two predetermined blood-relatives to appease the multitude of illiterate subjects.

And it works every time, every four years. Seems impossible that such happenstance, pomp, money, and circumstance could be involved in something that is so false and deceptive. I get it. But this doesn’t make it any less the Reality.

In my continuing effort to expose the fraud that is this indirect election of United States president, where voters have absolutely no say in Reality despite the illusional “freedom” of the common people’s ability to participate in popular voting (but not electing), here is an archived page from the federal government telling you how it works.

Pass it on…

Link, as printed below–> http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/electoral-college/electors.html

–=–

Who are the Electors?

What are the qualifications to be an Elector?

The U.S. Constitution contains very few provisions relating to the qualifications of Electors. Article II, section 1, clause 2 provides that no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector. As a historical matter, the 14th Amendment provides that State officials who have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the United States or given aid and comfort to its enemies are disqualified from serving as Electors. This prohibition relates to the post-Civil War era.

Each state’s Certificates of Ascertainment confirms the names of its appointed electors. A state’s certification of its electors is generally sufficient to establish the qualifications of electors.

Who selects the Electors?

The process for selecting Electors varies throughout the United States. Generally, the political parties nominate Electors at their State party conventions or by a vote of the party’s central committee in each State. Each candidate will have their own unique slate of potential Electors as a result of this part of the selection process.

Electors are often chosen to recognize service and dedication to their political party. They may be State-elected officials, party leaders, or persons who have a personal or political affiliation with the Presidential candidate.

On Election Day, the voters in each State choose the Electors by casting votes for the presidential candidate of their choice. The Electors’ names may or may not appear on the ballot below the name of the candidates running for President, depending on the procedure in each State. The winning candidate in each State—except in Nebraska and Maine, which have proportional distribution of the Electors—is awarded all of the State’s Electors. In Nebraska and Maine, the state winner receives two Electors and the winner of each congressional district receives one Elector. This system permits the Electors from Nebraska and Maine to be awarded to more than one candidate.

Are there restrictions on who the Electors can vote for?

There is no Constitutional provision or Federal law that requires Electors to vote according to the results of the popular vote in their States. Some States, however, require Electors to cast their votes according to the popular vote. These pledges fall into two categoriesElectors bound by State law and those bound by pledges to political parties.

The U.S. Supreme Court has held that the Constitution does not require that Electors be completely free to act as they choose and therefore, political parties may extract pledges from electors to vote for the parties’ nominees. Some State laws provide that so-calledfaithless Electors“; may be subject to fines or may be disqualified for casting an invalid vote and be replaced by a substitute elector. The Supreme Court has not specifically ruled on the question of whether pledges and penalties for failure to vote as pledged may be enforced under the Constitution. No Elector has ever been prosecuted for failing to vote as pledged.

Today, it is rare for Electors to disregard the popular vote by casting their electoral vote for someone other than their party’s candidate. Electors generally hold a leadership position in their party or were chosen to recognize years of loyal service to the party. Throughout our history as a nation, more than 99 percent of Electors have voted as pledged.

List of State Laws and Requirements Regarding the Electors

As of November 2000

Source: Congressional Research Service

The Office of the Federal Register presents this material for informational purposes only, in response to numerous public inquiries. The list has no legal significance. It is based on information compiled by the Congressional Research Service. For more comprehensive information, refer to the U.S. Constitution and applicable Federal laws.

Legal Requirements or Pledges


Electors in these States are bound by State Law or by pledges to cast their vote for a specific candidate:

ALABAMA – Party Pledge / State Law – § 17-19-2
ALASKA – Party Pledge / State Law – § 15.30.040; 15.30.070
CALIFORNIA – State Law – § 6906
COLORADO – State Law – § 1-4-304
CONNECTICUT – State Law – § 9-175
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA – DC Pledge / DC Law – § 1-1312(g)
FLORIDA – Party Pledge / State Law – § 103.021(1)
HAWAII – State Law – §§ 14-26 to 14-28
MAINE – State Law – § 805
MARYLAND – State Law – § 20-4
MASSACHUSETTS – Party Pledge / State Law – Ch. 53, § 8, Supp.
MICHIGAN – State Law – §168.47 (Violation cancels vote and Elector is replaced.)
MISSISSIPPI – Party Pledge / State Law – §23-15-785(3)
MONTANA – State Law – § 13-25-104
NEBRASKA – State Law – § 32-714
NEVADA – State Law – § 298.050
NEW MEXICO – State Law – § 1-15-5 to 1-15-9 (Violation is a fourth degree felony.)
NORTH CAROLINA – State Law – § 163-212 (Violation cancels vote; elector is replaced and is subject to $500 fine.)
OHIO – State Law – § 3505.40
OKLAHOMA – State Pledge / State Law – 26, §§ 10-102; 10-109 (Violation of oath is a misdemeanor, carrying a fine of up to $1000.)
OREGON – State Pledge / State Law – § 248.355
SOUTH CAROLINA – State Pledge / State Law – § 7-19-80 (Replacement and criminal sanctions for violation.)
VERMONT – State Law – title 17, § 2732
* VIRGINIA – State Law – § 24.1-162 (Virginia statute may be advisory – “Shall be expected” to vote for nominees.)
WASHINGTON – Party Pledge / State Law – §§ 29.71.020, 29.71.040, Supp. ($1000 fine.)
WISCONSIN – State Law – § 7.75
WYOMING – State Law – §§ 22-19-106; 22-19-108


No Legal Requirement: Electors in these States are not bound by State Law to cast their vote for a specific candidate:

ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
DELAWARE
GEORGIA
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MINNESOTA
MISSOURI
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW YORK
NORTH DAKOTA
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
WEST VIRGINIA

–=–

Have you ever asked yourself just what is the true purpose of these totally private associations (corporations) called political parties? Ever wonder why they are so powerful and why every president is one or the other main parties?

Legal, organized crime.

And the worst part is that they convince the common people, who have no right to elect, to join these criminal associations and participate in the legalized crime. They are even called “organizers.”

But let us be clear… the best way to control a multitude of people is to cause them to feel guilty about who they pick for their leader, as if they really have a choice, and thus to limit their responses to the mere waiting for the chance to do it all over again, to believe the illusion of voting the next ringer in and then waiting yet again to remedy their feigned choice. Controlled opposition. Brilliant.

And so here we are again, an institutionalized bunch of idiots about to vote for something they have no right to actually vote on, except to legitimize the very structure that politically enslaves them. In other words, the millions of denizened, enfranchised “voters” that turn up to the polls to be poled will be doing nothing more than offering the official “consent of the governed.” And for the rest, silence is consent to the majority will. And the majority is a pure idiocracy of uneducated fools.

Govern = to steer, as a ship. To control.

Ment = mind

Mind control.

And this is called the franchise of freedom.

.

–Clint Richardson (Realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Friday, January 29, 2016

The Word-Smith Fallacy


Quick rant here…

When one hears an excuse enough times, especially one that is blatantly outrageous in its underlying con-text, it sometimes causes one to boil over with the urge to lash out and utterly destroy the character of the one using the excuse.

In this case, having just heard such a term used for the 100th time at least, I’d like instead to practice my repose and dissect the problem calmly and rationally.

It is often the case that people in their discourse and cognitive dissonance use the term “wordsmith” in a dualistic fashion to defend whatever disposition they find themselves in. This term is used as a single phrase that implies a two-fold meaning, one being the defensive notion that “I am not a wordsmith,” while at the same time offensively inferring that “only a wordsmith would say such things.” In other words, the use of this term singlehandedly stops the conversation and thus the furtherance of knowledge sharing, and at the same time belittles the speaker or writer by creating an ad hominem attack on the character of he who studies and attempts to use words correctly. Amazingly, this seems to be a very popular response when the Reality of things, specifically the artful and alternative legal and metaphorical meaning of words of art, is presented and verified by multiple sources.

And so I am creating an new logical fallacy here, by the name of “The Wordsmith fallacy,” though logic and reason are nowhere to be found in its use.

So let me be perfectly clear while at the same time venting a bit of repressed and pent up aggression when I say this:

IF YOU AREN’T A WORDSMITH THEN YOU ARE FUCKING ILLITERATE!!!

There. I said it. Feels surprisingly liberating, really.

—=—

“Am I therefore become your enemy,
because I tell you the TRUTH?”

—Galatians 4:16, KJB

—=—

The synonyms of this term wordsmith are not many, those being “writer” and “author.”

–WordNet 3.0, Farlex clipart collection. 2003-2012 Princeton University, Farlex Inc.

In its most simplistic definition, we find the following:

1. fluent and prolific writer, especially one who writes professionally.
2. An expert on words.
American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fifth Edition, 2011, by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company.

1: a person who works with wordsespecially:  a skillful writer

 –Merriam-Webster, Incorporated, online, 2015 

Controlled by words…

The legislature is the author of law. The court administers that law and writes opinions. The president writes executive orders and presidential directives. The attorneys at bar write everything else, from procedure to rules of evidence to the over 100 Uniform Codes.

Oh, but they are just wordsmiths.

Sure asshole, and their skillful writings, being experts on the terms of art of the legal language just happened to enslave you and your illiterate family and their illiterate forefathers before them for generations.

Yeah, but they’re just wordsmiths!

Right dickweed, that’s the point. Because you are not. Because every contract you sign, every law you are bound in surety to follow, every flattering title you pretend, and every aspect of your life is controlled by their words. Yep, they smithed your person (status), they smithed your license, your social security card, and hell, they are even the smiths of the banking laws, which let’s face it, that number’s game is a whole other language most of us are also quite illiterate at.

Sure, but they are still just wordsmiths.

How fucking long can we play this game? How many times can you play this fallacy? How long can you “stick with stupid?”

Not ironically, there is already a word to describe this fallacious tool of idiocracy that has long been in existence, and of course each word leads to a connect-the-dots story to be told:

WORD-CATCHER – noun – One who CAVILS at words.

CAVIL – verb intransitive – 1. To raise captious and frivolous objections; to find fault without good reason; followed by at. It is better to reason than to cavil2. To advance futile objections, or to frame sophisms, for the sake of victory in an argument verb transitive – To receive or treat with objections. Wilt thou enjoy the good. Then cavil the conditions. – noun – False or frivolous objections; also, A FALLACIOUS KIND OF REASON, bearing some resemblance to truth, ADVANCED FOR THE SAKE OF VICTORY.

CAVILER – noun – One who CAVILS; one who is apt to raise captious objections; a captious disputant.

CAPTIOUS – adjective – 1. Disposed to find fault, or raise objections; APT TO CAVIL, as in popular language, it is said, apt to catch at; as a captious man2. Fitted to catch or ensnare; insidious; as a captious question. 3. Proceeding from a CAVILING DISPOSITION; as a captious objection or criticism.

SOPHISM  noun – [Latin sophisma.] A specious but fallacious argument; asubtilty in reasoning; an argument that is not supported by sound reasoning, or in which the inference is not justly deduced from the premises. When a false argument puts on the appearance of a true one, then it is properly called a sophism or fallacy.

–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language

So, is it fair to say that using the term wordsmith to escape discourse and ensnare the conversation is but a captious, sophist method of fallacious rhetoric? Or am I being too damned word-smithery for you?

At this point I have figured out the whole game, how everything was stolen from us through attainder and escheat, and how the feudal system is alive and well through contract, for the words of the contract make the law.

Oh, but those are just words, right?

There I go again. Damn wordsmith.

Well, I leave you with this final thought. In overcoming my own arrogance in using the English language in the pointless rhetoric we are bombarded with everyday, I was presented with a piece of information that I could not have imagined to be true, and one I followed to its suprising end. It spawned a whole discourse on the legal language, in the form of my upcomming works, an encyclopedic journey through legalese. And nothing I have ever done has been more enlightening, revealing just how illiterate I was in using the language I learned in public schools; the one given to us to keep us dumb to the designs of those wordsmiths we complain so much about but never learn their art.

And so to be clear, here is what you think you know.

DOG-LATINThe Latin of ILLITERATE PERSONS; Latin WORDS put together on the ENGLISH GRAMMATICAL SYSTEM.

–Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition

You see, my fallaciously caviler detractors, a slave-master never teaches his slaves his mysteries, never revealing the artful law and its structure of words that entangles him in intangible chains. He keeps his slaves illiterate, spiritually and deductively, just as the priest-class has kept the multitude ignorant of its words for many centuries, so that the people may listen to the wordsmiths (priests) rather than read the Source and True meaning of their words.

The lawmakers will never teach the general population that which they seek to control them with, keeping their private language as their secretive terms of art, revealing them only under oath in private associations; conspiratorial combinations of men acting as agents (attorneys), as officers of the court (crown). And guess what, the translators of the Bible too will never re-smith it into anything but dog-Latin, so that despite the fact that there are more Bible’s than people on this planet and that they are given away free and can be found available in every hotel room, these wordsmiths of the king ensured that you would never be able to read it’s words in their true intent. For they only teach us dog-Latin. They keep us all public-minded, through public-education, by the vulgar public language, while they privately control the “higher” one to ensure constant confusion. The Bible is written in the king’s language, legalese; as a mostly parabolic metaphor. And the legal fiction is opposed to dog-Latin.

—=—

“All intelligent thoughts have already been thought; what is necessary is only to try to think them again.”

—Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

—=—

And so, my illiterate compatriots, when you finally figure out that every word you say in dog-Latin carries the opposite meaning of the legal wordsmith in a black robe you are speaking to, perhaps then you will comprehend why you always loose in court. Why you can’t figure out how to exit their system based on their artful words. Why you can’t quite grasp how you are tricked into volunteering to be subject to them. And why you always turn away from perfectly good conversations simply because you can’t speak the language that sounds exactly like your own, public, dumbed down version.

So learn the language or continue to eat shit.

SHYSTERnoun -“unscrupulous lawyer,” 1843, U.S. slang, probably altered from German Scheisser “incompetent worthless person,” from Scheisse “SHIT” (n.), from Old High German skizzan “to defecate” (see shit (verb)).

–Etymonline.com

It’s up to you…

—=—

The roots of language are
irrational and of a magical nature
.” 

—Jorge Luis Borges, Prologue to “El otro, el mismo.”

—=—

“Names are an important key to what a society values. Anthropologists recognize naming as one of the chief methods FOR IMPOSING ORDER ON PERCEPTION.”

—David S. Slawson

—=—

“There exists, for everyone, a sentence – a series of WORDS – that has the power to destroy you. Another sentence exists, another series of WORDS, that could heal you. If you’re lucky you will get the second, but you can be certain of getting the first.”

―Philip K. Dick, quoted from: ‘VALIS’

—=—

“…and the chief priests and the scribes sought how they might take him by CRAFT, and put him to death.”

—Mark 14:1, KJB

—=—

“In politics, nothing happens by accident.
If it happens, you can bet
it was planned that way.”

—President Franklin D. Roosevelt

—=—

“In doubtful cases, the presumption always is in behalf of the CROWN.”

—Latin Maxim, AMBIGUIS CASIBUS SEMPER PRAESUMITUR PRO REGE. Lofft, Append. 248. (Blacks 4th)

—=—

“The latter part of a wise man’s life is taken up in curing the FOLLIES, PREJUDICES, and FALSE OPINIONS he had CONTRACTED in the former.”

—Jonathan Swift, ‘Thoughts On Various Subjects, Moral & Diverting’
—=—

Cure yourself, or stand in painful prejudice and ignorance. But keep your fallacy and false opinions away from me! For your dis-ease is not medical, but contractual. And the only solution is end of contract. No really, the word solution in legalese means only one thingend of contract.

Oh, but that’s just word-smithing again…

.

–Clint Richardson (Realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Saturday, January 23, 2016

 

 

Geo-Engineering: Controlled Chaos Via Predictive Programming


To the modern “scientist,” the name of the game is control. But to control anything one must be able to accurately predict the actions and movements of that which is to be controlled. The predictively programmed populations of all the nations, especially the supposedly free Americans, is certainly a perfect example of the truth of this notion. To predict is the first step towards control. Simple. Logical. But the result is of course a spiritual wasteland.

The god of science is not so different than the God of Nature, only called as and considered by different names, which both represent the attributes of Nature as either the Design of Creation or as the randomness of unpredictable forces. Ironically, this is not a battle of correctness, for both of these descriptions are equally accurate, depending only upon the mindset of the proclaimer. While the spiritual monotheist sees God as the worship of all Nature in one perfect state of Being, the scientific mind sees a chaotic and yet somehow cohesive universe that somehow remains intact against odds, but whose source cannot be explained away so simply as with that obtuse religious notion. While the spiritual man is satisfied with the way things are and strives to protect not only God’s Nature but his place within its Ultimate and Supreme Design, the scientist in flattering title will actually tear apart each layer of that which exists without scientific explanation and destroy life so as to understand it. Of course the cessation of life itself destroys the scientists goal. For today’s science is not a natural one, but a corporate, commercial one. Just as the several denominations of religion exist as mere fractured copies of their source (the Bible), the many foundations and institutions and incorporations of “science” have nothing to do with the actual meaning and intent of the science of things nor of the scientific method, but stand in name only, as simulacra (copies without an original) that simulate science in name only while in Truth destroying its very Nature.

In my own opinion, in this way, modern religions and the modern sciences are the same things, merely institutionalized frauds as art feigning to be Reality, artificial corporations pretending to be something they are not, while using the name of their gods (God) in form without substance to justify the means to their own ends.

In the end, the Source becomes the victim, and all of Nature, including man’s place within it, is being systematically altered in the name of the scientific god (chaos), and further protected by the spiritually void defenders of the false faith (truth) of religion, whose governments violently enforce the right of licensed murder of the very Nature sought to be controlled.

But first, it must be made scientifically predictable.

This introduction may seem on its surface to be a strange one for the subject matter we are about to discover, but in fact it leads us into the wonderful and wacky world of weather modification, prediction, and ultimately therefore control of its predictably chaotic patterns.

The institutionalized atheistic point of view is not that of Godlessness, but that chaos is the essence of God, for to consider God in a form that is uncontrollable is simply hell to the unspiritual man. In fact chaos and its imagined ability to be controlled by such computerized (artificial intelligencer) systems such as we see with modern weather control techniques is at the forefront of science these days. The CERN facility with its patron god Shiva (the destroyer) watching over its massive particle accelerator is the perfect example of the extremes that the syndicalist, scientific community will go to attempt to capture the building blocks of God (i.e. chaos), even labeling its first query as the “God particle.” For the theoretical physicist, to imagine control over chaos is to control the uncontrollable and fractal Design of the universe. In other words, modern science seeks to control what the religious man would in finality call God’s Nature and Design, while simultaneously denying Its Existence. Non-content to accept It for the spiritual Nature that It Is, the institutionalized commercial business of “science” has placed all of Nature and the Universe under the god of mammon, assigning a valuation in money over all things and pretending that insurance policies will repair any damages thereof with a payout in surety for the price of the life or thing lost to the discovery process. The word/noun/name “science” is an excuse and a justification, not a literal translation, just as the active Biological Warfare Program (Title 50, Chapter 32) of the United States uses the terminology of “scientific, medical, and research purposes” to justify continuously, scientifically testing biological and radioactive weaponry (including food and airport scanners) upon its own subjects (public citizens). And along the way, all things discovered are patented for future commercial exploitation by the nation, confirming the worst of dystopian science fiction stories where the big corporations own everything, including our own discovered and re-engineered genes, and are protected by the peacekeeping forces of government in some federation of United Nations (or planets)…

And so we have a “science” that essentially works on the thesis that Creation has no Creator, and that chaos is the ruler of all things. To call this a “satanist” thought process, in terms of religious thought, is surprisingly an accurate approbation. For the word satan in the concordances of scripture simply means that which is adversarial to Life and Nature, though the corporate religions (in name only) have convinced us that satan is a creature instead of a state of mind in men. But then, it would also be correct to say that corporations calling themselves in name only as religions of the Bible are quite satanic (adversarial) to what the Bible actually says.

I’m an equal opportunity offender, calling bullshit on all incorporations (personas) just as the Bible does, including the church, the state, and the syndicates that rise in between their false powers of recreation, licensure, and protectionism. But then the Truth as the Reality of things is often the most offensive thing imaginable. If you don’t like the way I’m talking, you certainly won’t like my upcoming book, which was as equally painful to write as it will be to read. Reality hurts more than anything.

But let us go back to where chaos became a mainstay of scientific thought, slowly penetrating the already indoctrinated halls of universities and military installations. For we must look towards the reasons that modern methods were built up and exist through virtually unlimited funding and support before we can uncover the purpose of their organized, syndicalistic missions.

And so I ask you, the reader, a question. Is weather predictable?

Before you answer that, you should know that “science” declared it to be wholly unpredictable many decades ago. For in discovering the total unpredictability of non-linear weather patterns, this was the side effect that lead to chaos theory. And the question no longer became one of controlling the weather, but one of controlling chaos. For weather is the after-effect of chaos. The expression of effect is only the result of cause.

And so I wish to instill in the reader a different thought pattern, one perhaps not contemplated before. So put your conspiratorial hats on and examine this…

We often consider our local weather portion of the news with a grain of salt, noticing quite often that the virtual graphics represented by our local “meteorologist” or “weather-man” seem to never quite match what happens in Nature (under God) in that chaotic Design that we will never truly comprehend nor are supposed to. In fact, even the weather-man makes the disclaimer that weather is often or always unpredictable to cover his ass and to save his worthless job as a media entertainer, because remember, weather is unpredictable due to its non-linear movement.

Any good farmer knows by his bad knee alone that rain is coming, let alone the farmer’s almanac and other old-school tricks and tools. But the news corporations have actually convinced us that they can predict the weather, even when they know and admit they can’t.

And in the greatest of cosmic ironies what is their excuse for passing on bullshit as the latest news and information? Why can’t they deliver what is promised (without conditional disclaimer)?

An act of God.

For those who refuse to believe in God, you should know that even the legal law of government believes in God’s power and authority over even its artificial laws and design. And oh if people only knew how important this is in law. But notice also that an act of God has absolutely nothing to do with any corporate religion, for God is not the Creator of religion!!!

ACT OF GODInevitable accident; vis major. Any misadventure or casualty is said to be caused by the “act of God” when it happens by the direct, immediate, and exclusive operation of the forces of NATURE, uncontrolled or uninfluenced by the power of man and without human intervention, and is of such a character that it could not have been prevented or escaped from by any amount of foresight or prudence, or by any reasonable degree of care or diligence, or by the aid of any appliances which the situation of the party might reasonably require him to use. Inevitable accident, or casualty; any accident produced by any physical cause which is irresistible, such as lightning, tempests, perils of the seas, an inundation, or earthquake; and also the sudden illness or death of persons. Under the term “act of God” are comprehended all misfortunes and accidents arising from inevitable necessity, which human prudence could not foresee or prevent. (Black’s Law 1st Edition)

ACT OF GOD – An act occasioned exclusively by violence of nature without the interference of any HUMAN AGENCY. It means a natural necessity proceeding from physical causes alone without the intervention of man. It is an act, event, happening, or occurrence, a disaster and effect due to natural causes and inevitable accident, or disaster; a natural and inevitable necessity which implies entire exclusion of all human agency which operates without interference or aid from man and which results from natural causes and is in no sense attributable to human agency. It is an accident which could not have been occasioned by human agency but proceeded from physical causes alone. In the civil law, vis majorInevitable accident or casualty; not preventable by human care, skill, or foresight, but resulting from natural causes, misfortunes and accidents arising from inevitable necessity which human prudence could not foresee or prevent; a landslide in the Panama Canal and changes in the styles of wearing apparel are NOT “acts of God“; otherwise, however, as to a strike, accompanied with violence and intimidation. The term is sometimes defined as equivalent to inevitable accident: but incorrectly, as there is a distinction between the two; See Inevitable Accident; Perils of the Sea. (Black’s Law 4th Edition)

–=–

Why is this important?

Are you frickin’ kidding me?

I’ll give you a hint… If you aren’t (acting as) a man of God, then you are (acting as) a person of the State. And trust me when I say that your birth certificate (registration of a legal event) is not an act of God.

But you see a “scientist” is not either an act (Creation) of God. It’s a flattering title, a creation of the State designed to grant and garner respect where none should be by the victims of organized “big” science. And while God would certainly allow no license to harm or destroy its Life force and Nature of Creation, government is quite happy to pretend such licensure and credential through flattering title so long as one’s discoveries are made and patented in false legal persona and under its rule and ownership. For to the “scientist,” government is its god, as the creator of that legal title attached to that legal person, the act birthed of the state. Government is the creator of all titles that man must operate under to be funded and qualified to do so much harm in the name of Natural Science as “scientists” in name only. Just take away the harmonic consideration of nature and its laws and anything goes.

But what happens when we start questioning the reason why weather prediction became such a big business for news outlets and newspapers around the world? What happens when we question just why meteorologists are stationed in every broadcast area of every state in America, even the smallest of townships? Why so many weather radars? Why so many movies like “Twister” showing the wondrous heroism of storm-chasers? Why so many technologies on a nano-scale like smart dust if the goal was not to measure every inch or foot of space in the atmosphere in order to “read” the weather so as to predict it with fair certainty for the next hour or day only, and only then in order to control it? Why so much emphasis on something that is admittedly, wholly unpredictable past a day or two even in the most prestigious of academic and scientific circles???

Oh, did I forget to mention the real meaning of the word prestigious?

PRESTIGIOUS – adjective – Practicing tricks; juggling. (Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

PRESTIGES – noun – [Latin proestigioe.] Juggling tricks; impostures(Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

PRESTIGIATION – noun – [Latin proestigioe, tricks.] The playing of legerdemain tricks; a juggling(Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

LEGERDEMAIN – noun – [See Light.] Slight of hand; a deceptive performance which depends on dexterity of hand; a trick performed with such art and adroitness, that the manner or art eludes observation. The word is sometimes used adjectively; as a legerdemain trick.

–=–

Who needs slight of hand when we have green screen? The magical art of the meteorologist eludes us because he appears to be floating over the earth like a god, his hand pointing towards some human population and declaring the weather patterns according to the words spoken via the great A.I. in the sky.

It is not ironic that in my previous research article, entitled and linked as “Degrees In Geo-Engineering And Sustainable Development,” we found that indeed the most “prestigious” of universities around the world are offering courses on weather modification and control, as well as reseeding the oceans. Unfortunately, for these “scientists,” the sky is not the limit. The correct term for this internationally recognized program is of course “Geo-Engineering,” and the offering of these degrees is certainly evidence of how powerful and influential the evil science corporations of this new world technocratic order have become.

My point here is that it seems to me that the building up of an intercontinental system of linked in systems and information technology while simultaneously building an infrastructure of meteorologists and meteorological centers and radars all across the world, all with the intent to predict the unpredictable nature of chaos, to peer into the unknowable clockwork of God, seems a bit fishy to me. That is, unless I look at it as a well organized and executed plan between two or more people (a conspiracy) to control, but not really to predict in any significant way, the future of weather.

And so I leave the reader with this excerpt from a book I recommend to anyone who seeks to know his enemy. For the enemy is not man, but man’s designs to control all that supports man. Love thy enemies but hate their art, hate their “science,” and hate the tools of their destructive, adversarial ways.

From his 1987 book entitled Chaos: Making A New Science, author James Gleick beautifully describes this phenomenon of the chaos theory and its recent evolution as the ultimate scientific religion, while filling us in on the history of the desire by evil men to control the weather by dissecting its god.

“…The average person, seeing that we can predict tides pretty well a few months ahead would say, why  can’t we do the same thing with the atmosphere, it’s just a different fluid system, the laws are about as complicated. But I realized that any physical system that behaved non periodically would be unpredictable.”

“The Fifties and sixties were years of unreal optimism about weather forecasting. Newspapers and magazines were filled with hope for weather science, not just for prediction but for modification and control. Two technologies were maturing together, the digital computer and the space satellite. An international program was being prepared to take advantage of them, the Global Atmosphere Research Program. There was an idea that human society would free itself from weather’s turmoil and become its master instead of its victim. Geodesic domes would cover cornfields. Airplanes would seed the clouds. Scientists would learn how to make rain and how to stop it.

“The intellectual father of this popular notion was Von Neumann, who built his first computer with the precise intention, among other things, of controlling the weather. He surrounded himself with meteorologists and gave breathtaking talks about his plans to the general physics community. He had a specific mathematical reason for his optimism. He recognized that a complicated dynamical system could have points of instability — critical points where a small push can have large consequences, as with a ball balanced at the top of a hill. With the computer up and running, Von Neumann imagined that scientists would calculate the equations of fluid motion for the next few days. Then a central committee of meteorologists would send up airplanes TO LAY DOWN SMOKE SCREENS OR SEED CLOUDS TO PUSH THE WEATHER INTO THE DESIRED MODE. But Von Neumann had overlooked the possibility of chaos, with instability at every point.

By the 1980’s a vast and expensive bureaucracy devoted itself to carrying out Von Neumann’s mission, or at least the prediction part of it. America’s premier forecasters operated out of an unadorned cube of a building in suburban Maryland, near the Washington beltway, with a spy’s nest of radar and radio antennas on the roof. Their supercomputer ran a model that resembled Lorenz’s only in its fundamental spirit. Where the Royal Mcbee could carry out sixty multiplications each second, the speed of a Control Data Cyber 205 was measured in megaflops, millions of floating-point operations per second. Where Lorenz had been happy with twelve equations, the modern global model calculated systems of 500,000 equations. The model understood the way moisture moved heat in and out of the air when it condensed and evaporated. The digital winds were shaped by digital mountain ranges. Data poured in hourly from every nation on the globe, from airplanes, satellites, and ships. The National Meteorological Center produced the world’s second best forecasts.

“The best came out of Reading, England, a small college town an hour’s drive from London. The European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts occupied a modest tree-shaded building in a generic United Nations style, modern brick-and-glass architecture, decorated with gifts from many lands. It was built in the heyday of the all-European Common Market spirit, when most of the nations of western Europe decided to pool their talent and resources in the cause of weather prediction. The Europeans attributed their success to their young, rotating staff — no civil service — and their Cray supercomputer, which always seemed to be one model ahead of the American counterpart.

Weather forecasting was the beginning but hardly the end of the business of using computers to model complex systems. The same techniques served many kinds of physical scientists and social scientists hoping to make predictions about everything from the small-scale fluid flows that concerned propeller designers to the vast financial flows that concerned economists. Indeed, by the seventies and eighties, economic forecasting by computer bore a real resemblance to global weather forecasting. The models would churn through complicated, somewhat arbitrary webs of equations, meant to turn measurements of initial conditions — atmospheric pressure or money supplyinto a simulation of future trends. The programmers hoped the results were not too grossly distorted by the many unavoidable simplifying assumptions. If a model did anything too obviously bizarreflooded the Sahara or tripled interest ratesthe programmers would revise the equations to bring the output back in line with expectation. In practice, econometric models proved dismally blind to what the future would bring, but many people who should have known better acted as though they believed in the results. Forecasts of economic growth or unemployment were put forward with an implied precision of two or three decimal places. Governments and financial institutions paid for such predictions AND ACTED ON THEM, perhaps out of necessity or for want of anything better. Presumably they knew that such variables as “consumer optimism” were not as nicely measurable as “humidity” and that the perfect differential equations had not yet been written for the movement of politics and fashion. But few realized how fragile was the very process of modeling flows on computers, even when the data was reasonably trustworthy and the laws were purely physical, as in weather forecasting.

Computer modeling had indeed succeeded in changing the weather business from an ART to a SCIENCE. The European Centre’s assessments suggested that the world saved billions of dollars each year from predictions that were statistically better than nothing. But beyond two or three days the world’s best forecasts were speculative, and beyond six or seven they were worthless.

The Butterfly Effect was the reason. For small pieces of weather — and to a global forecaster, small can mean thunderstorms and blizzards — any prediction deteriorates rapidly. Errors and uncertainties multiply, cascading upward through a chain of turbulent features, from dust devils and squalls up to continent-size eddies that only satellites can see.

The modern weather models work with a grid of points on the order of sixty miles apart, and even so, some starting data has to be guested, since ground stations and satellites cannot see everywhere. But suppose the earth could be covered with sensors spaced one foot apart, rising at one foot intervals all the way to the top of the atmosphere. Suppose every sensor gives perfectly accurate readings of temperature, pressure, humidity, and any other quantity a meteorologist would want. Precisely at noon an infinitely powerful computer takes all the data and calculates what will happen at each point at 12:01, then 12:02, then 12:03…

The computer will still be unable to predict whether Princeton, New Jersey, will have sun or rain on a day one month away. At noon the spaces between the sensors will hide fluctuations that the computer will not know about, tiny deviations from the average. By 12:01, those fluctuations will already have created small errors one foot away. Soon the errors will have multiplied to the ten-foot scale, and so on up to the size of the globe.

Even for experienced meteorologists, all this runs against intuition. One of Lorenz’s oldest friends was Robert White, a fellow meteorologist at M.I.T. who later became head of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Lorenz told him about the Butterfly Effect and what he felt it meant for long-range prediction. White gave Von Neumann’s answer. “Prediction, nothing,” he said. “THIS IS WEATHER CONTROL.” His thought was that small modifications, well within human capability, could cause desired large-scale changes.

“Lorenz saw it differently. Yes, you could change the weather. You could make it do something different from what it would otherwise have done. But if you did, then you would never know what it would otherwise have done. It would be like giving an extra shuffle to an already well-shuffled pack of cards. You know it will change your luck, but you don’t know whether for better or worse

Had he stopped with the Butterfly Effect, and image of predictability giving way to pure randomness, then Lorenz would have produced no more than a piece of very bad news. But Lorenz saw more than randomness embedded in his weather model. He saw a fine geometrical structure, order masquerading as randomness…”

–=–

Imagine what has happened in the almost 30 years of technological advancements in the art of computer and weather science.

But more importantly, never forget what technology actually is. For a scientist is not acting as himself, but as the self (person) of another. And when art becomes a science, the world turns into exactly what we see today, a self-destructing hell with a disease-riddled populace hopefully about to have a massive spiritual awakening before they sleep permanently as but a memory of their pre-technological discoveries and desires.

TECHNOLOGY – noun – [Gr. art, and word or discourse.] 1. A description of arts; or a treatise on the arts2. An explanation of the TERMS of the arts(Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

ART – The second person, indicative mode, present tense, of the substantive verb am. – noun – [Latin ars, artis.] 1. The disposition or modification of things by human skill, to answer the purpose intended. In this sense art stands opposed to nature2. A system of rules, serving to facilitate the performance of certain actions; opposed to science, or to speculative principles; as the art of building or engraving. Arts are divided into useful or mechanic, and liberal or polite. The mechanic arts are those in which the hands and body are more concerned than the mind; as in making clothes, and utensils. These art are called trades. The liberal or polite arts are those in which the mind or imagination is chiefly concerned; as poetry, music and painting. In America, literature and the elegant arts must grow up side by side with the coarser plants of daily necessity. 3. Skill, dexterity, or the power of performing certain actions, acquired by experience, study or observation; as, a man has the art of managing his business to advantage(Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

ARTIFICE – noun – [Latin artificium, from ars, art, and facio, to make.] 1. Stratagem; an artful or ingenious device, in a good or bad sense. In a bad sense, it corresponds with trick, or fraud2. ART; trade; skill acquired by science or practice. [Rarely used.] (Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

ARTIFICIAL – adjective  1. Made or contrived by ART, or by human skill and labor, in opposition to natural; as artificial heat or light; an artificial magnet. 2. Feigned, fictitious; not genuine or natural; as artificial tears. 3. Contrived with skill or art4. Cultivated; not indigenous; not being of spontaneous growth; as artificial grasses. Artificial arguments, in rhetoric, are arguments invented by the speaker, in distinction from laws, authorities and the like, which are called inartificial arguments of proofs. Artificial lines, on a sector or scale, are lines so contrived as to represent the logarithmic sines and tangents, which, by the help of the line of numbers, solve, with tolerable exactness, questions in trigonometry, navigation, etc. Artificial numbers, the same with logarithms. (Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

–=–

The art of modern science is a madhouse of psychopathy and amorality mixed with the deadly combination of an apparent lack of empathy towards any final “scientific” results. All life, all existence, seems to be collateral damage, including you and me.

I am not sure how to stop this madness from prospering by presenting some artful or political challenge to it. I can only leave the reader with a summery of what, after years of study, I have found written in the Bible. It is simply that the art, the fiction, the artificial, legalistic nature of things which we call as satanism will continue to rule over us until one and only one thing happens. It is not some return of some savior or holy ghost as the church sells in its hopium soundbites, and it is not some super-hero as Hollywood presents to us to make us forget that we individually and we alone are the problem; our own worst enemy, and so the only One that can save our selves.

The Bible says simply this: As long as man respects the art and sciences, that is the designs of man over that of Nature’s True and vibrant harmony, and as long as man respects the governors (archons) and ecclesiastical (legal) religious powers that be, and as long as man respects persons (including any corporations), flattering authoritative titles, respecting false oaths to inanimate objects and to the flags of nations, and in fact continue to do and be controlled mentally and thus physically by everything we do and do not do in political (artificial) society under governments and religions designed in their inception to be corrupt and to corrupt utterly the mind, body, and soul of every man, then we will simply reap what we allow to be sown.

And you know what, that makes a shit-load of sense to me. And I don’t think a new form of “science” is going to fix this, for this is a spiritual problem. Corporations exist because we let them, as do governments and religions, the trifecta of evil.

So either stand up or find a nice lounge-chair for the end of the world as we know it (as God intended it). The choice is and always has been yours and yours alone.

–Clint Richardson (Realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Monday, January 18th, 2016

Corporation Nation Radio, Now History (His Story)


It is with profound comfort and sadness that after more than 2 years I have decided to cease broadcasting with Republic Broadcasting Network 5 days a week. This decision reflects nothing regarding that station or its employees, and I wish to thank John Stadtmiller for trusting and allowing me such a platform in such a prime time. Republic is unfortunately a remnant of the old model of network radio being systematically abused, attacked, and made obsolete by the technology of the internet. John is fighting one hell of a battle to keep RBN breathing and even to keep the lights on. Many similar stations have fallen by the same methods, and to the fact that now anyone with a cheap consumer microphone can upload their own show into the digital ether. This ability is not, as many believe, a new kind of glorious digital liberty as much as it is a destructive anarchy of unchecked and non-vetted information.

With that said, and with the broadcast sphere of Youtube and do-it-yourself internet radio personalities all selling their own brand of perceptive virtual reality (i.e. “truth”) for monetary kickbacks, the saturation effect is in my opinion a well-played tool by those who wish to obfuscate legitimacy in alternative broadcasting.

And so I have decided to focus my time in finishing what is now destined to be a three-volume work, my book series called “Strawman: The Real Story Of Your Artificial Person,” realizing that all of these digital creations may be gone tomorrow, erased from the digital ether, and leaving nothing behind to show for it. I look forward to creating an actual work in book-form that is immune from that red button of virtual and digital destruction and censorship, and even from the false flag “EMP” that may accomplish the same trick.

The first volume of this work will be free to download at my other website soon, and I will announce its posting in (.pdf) format for free download in the next couple of months. Instructions on how to obtain a hard copy (unpublished, not public, non-commercial) will be included within. As it is a private work, it will not be available by drone from Amazon or any other retail source, and is not “commercially” available in any way. It may only be obtained from myself. You will understand why this was my choice, my election when you read it.

LINK –> StrawmanStory.info

While this privilege lasts, the internet gods are allowing my archives to be available for listening and download, again free of charge, at the external site listed below.

Special thanks to Drew Carter for not only being with me from the beginning, answering the call to archive these shows, but also for creating this searchable spreadsheet of notes and links for each show and other interviews I’ve done since on other networks. At this link and in this spreadsheet you will find links to all 487 shows plus descriptions of guests and their websites.

LINK –> https://corporationnationradioarchives.wordpress.com/2016/01/01/whew-data-entry-complete/

This spreadsheet may be updated with future shows where I am guest, and  these shows will be posted on the archive site if Drew has the time and gumption.

Of course, the original archives (with commercials not cut out) will be on the RBN website as well.

To the listener, please bear in mind that this show was a learning experience especially for myself, and so was a continuum of learning and shared knowledge as my guests and myself unraveled the not-so-hidden mysteries. And of course we will never in any of our lifetimes know it all. The point is that show #400 may include the presumption of information learned in show #300. In other words, because we have never tried to sell anything on this show, keeping its intent pure and charitable, we were actually there to learn and to teach without such low and mean distractions and monetary considerations. And so like in any school setting, missing the first half of lessons or not learning the early mathematical theories and answers may mean that later information is not able to be comprehended fully. And of course much of this journey of discovery was in correcting my own fallacious notions of history, of language, and of law, and especially of the spiritual, scriptural knowledge that cannot be discovered without learning the figurative and legal language it was written in. To read the kings law book one must learn the king’s “higher” language. This is what we have learned. We have attempted in every way to kill our superego by removing our respect of our strawman id-entity. Thus, the ego must die as well.

Thanks to all who have followed and stuck with me as we have broken down paradigms and utterly destroyed history. Thanks for your letters, your gifts of books and donations, and for your support in general. Equal thanks to the trolls who have had the opposite effect as they intended, which was to make me question everything and be extra careful to seek Reality over the perception of truth in fiction. And thanks to all my friends and family, both for their love and support (and patience) and for the abandonment and painful separation. I realized long ago that to be in search of the Reality of things is rare, and that seeking such Reality is the most self-offensive thing we can do. Nothing hurts more. Nothing is more offensive than the actual Truth of Reality. For we are all living our own lie in a very convincing fiction of law and society, and with religious and patriotic zeal we defend that lie to escape Reality, even to the death.

In the end, in my final shows, as I began to see more than I bargained for, as this debtor’s hell began to manifest before my eyes, my listening friends were not surprised to see me quit. They could hear it in my voice, a profound sobering and sadness, even a hopelessness manifesting in every new discovery. However, it is only through the act of destroying all hope and facing Reality head on without artifice that each of us may ever finally act upon our knowledge and stop ignoring the problems in the hopes of some superhero that will come and save the day. The return of the Savior. For even christ’s parabolic Word tells us that in the end we can only save ourselves.

And so I leave these words, these shows, as my gift to any who seek to learn from my own limited knowledge. I will continue to post to this blog, probably more often now without having a radio show every day, and I will continue to seek the solutions, not the remedies.

My next project, I have decided, in conjunction with my writings, is to make a research documentary about the history and possibility of establishing the modern version of a monastery. Since all of our land has been stolen (on paper) from under us, which is explained in detail in my work “Strawman,” our collective problem is that we have no where left to walk to. Our parents have nothing to leave us but defective, imperfect titles and debt paper. Our blood has been figuratively corrupted through our certified birth into the legal fiction, and we stand in public attainder through contract, without the ability to be lawful heirs. And so it is my belief, my passion, that we can make the idea of a religious society, a place of immunity and sanctuary from legal debauchery and pursuit of money in mammon cool again. We cannot be free without a place to be free. We cannot practice moral, natural law without a moral, natural place to do so without legal personification. And so I believe the monastery to be the answer, even as recognized by their law. For no law of man may stand in respect of True religious intent, and True religious intent means to never respect persons or flattering titles or the oaths they take.

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…”

–=–

The meaning of this is lost simply because we are not parties to this constitution as public persons in contract. We attend churches that are legal corporations, which means they are not only respected but restricted by the legal law of government. In other words, every corporation calling itself a “church” or organized “religion” is under the legal law, not over it, defeating the entire purpose of being a religious man. Each of us is the temple, and our temple is enslaved and destroyed by our participation in legal affairs through citizenship. And so we must strive to escape such respect of artifice, by standing unseen in a Pure and True religious being based on Charity and Love, without any need or participation in legal things. We must shed our strawman and stop respecting others.

FREEDOM OF RELIGION – Embraces the concept of freedom to believe and freedom to act, the first of which (belief) is absolute, but the second of which (action) remains subject to regulation for protection of society. (Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)

–=–

To put it simply, a public U.S. citizen-ship has no right to practice any moral or religious law. This is Caesar’s society, not our own. For U.S. citizenship is the abandonment of free religion and is an acceptance of the national flattering title of legalized “Christian,” as if one can be born as a follower of christ without first obtaining years of knowledge of the scriptures. A nation cannot be a follower of christ, because a nation is a damned fiction of law, and all who respect it are in damnation. And whatever is born of the nation, all citizenships, are thus nationally whatever their creator establishes them as, which in the case of a Romanized, Latinized, “Christian Nation,” is a false, artificial title of “Christian” under Caesar (district of New Columbia). The word district in law means seizure. And all things are seized under Caesar, under this modern contractual feud of public citizenship. Essentially, even the self-proclaimed “atheist” while acting in U.S. citizenship is a corporate “Christian,” no different than those pagans who partook in Caesar’s empire and sat in the colosseums watching the True, uncontrollable followers of christ be fed to the lions.

This is the whole point of religion. For religion is the one and only exemption to the secular, legal (anti-Nature, anti-God) law of man. The only way to abjure the realm (jurisdiction) is to be convicted of crime or to join a monastery! This is well documented, and is also the difference between a private and public man.

The religions of church and state stand purposefully opposed to this, as incorporated institutions of the state designed to take man away from his True religion and provide a false temple “built by hands.”

And this brings me to the precipice, to the beginning of a new journey. I hope that you will be a part of it. I hope that you will help to spread my free work when released soon so that others may discover their own disposition so well occulted by public-mindedness, public education, and public entertainment. The legal matrix cannot be seen, for it is only a coded language artfully made to appear as Reality. The strawman cannot be viewed in the mirror, for it is only a false man built of paper, of contracts and mortgages (dead pledges) in mortmain (dead hands), of credits and debits, and of legal words and flattering titles that do not exist in Nature.

—=—

“Receive my instruction, and not silver;
and knowledge rather than choice gold.

For wisdom is better than rubies;
and all the things that may be desired
are not to be compared to it.”

—Proverbs 8: 10-11, KJB

—=—

All that I have gained I am now ready to render back to Caesar, for all I have acquired has always been the property of Caesar’s public persona, the strawman I have possessed like a demon since its birth, the puppet I breathe life into, the ship I sail on the sea of commerce. No possession, no trinket, no dwelling place, and no paper title is worth debt slavery in seizure (Caesar). I am ready to give up everything in fiction so as to embrace the Reality of Nature and Its Highest, self-evident Law. And so after years of debilitating hope and much talk I am ready to act, to find my way and to walk the spiritual path.

Perhaps we shall meet along the way.

Or perhaps we may build our dreams and find Reality again together.

Till then, there is an unlimited wealth of knowledge in this internet, even as traditional books and libraries are being figuratively burned and ignored. Deciphering that knowledge between so much bullshit is the ultimate challenge. And learning the language that enslaves us is the greatest task of all, which is the purpose of my upcoming works. When every word we speak has an opposing (legal) meaning in the jurisdiction (fictional realm) of  the church and state, we can attain only false enlightenment. We cannot read the scriptures in common English, for it is purposefully designed to be the language of illiteracy, the public language of the multitude of goyim. The priest-class never gave us the tool to decipher the Bible because they reserved the Latin meanings of their words for themselves. And our laws are written in the same, “higher” language of that spell-craft. And so a master and professor of the English language is at best a complete idiot, so in love with the meanings of the lowest, vulgar form of words that all sense of Reality is gone, as the word becomes more important than the Nature of Reality so named. And we teach each new generation in the same vulgarity, keeping the human capital management system intact through sheer nightmarish ignorance of language.

My work is designed to teach that “higher” language as they who created it have labeled it, not to use it as they do to induce harm but to defeat it utterly by recognizing its purpose. For it can only be used as a lie, as all things legal or “higher” are a lie.

But I digress…

I cannot place thousands of pages and definitions into one simple blog post. I hope that you will find enlightenment in my upcoming works.

Thank you again to all who have joined me on this journey.

And remember that everything in the legal realm is artificial, including your self. This is the key to knowledge.

–=–

“For all the gods of the nations are idols…”

—Psalms 96:5, KJB

–=–

.

–Clint Richardson (Realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Friday, January 8th, 2016

New Election, Same Old Blood


 

For my listeners and past readers, even the trolls among you, this info should certainly come as no surprise or as anything new. For we have shown that only the private bloodline, that preambled Posterity of those founding representatives of “white persons” can become president, and of course “they” are all related by their “legitimate” lineage written by hands in their own fabled genealogies. There is never a choice in these elections except between two cousins, not that the common public actually elects anybody by merely participating in the limited voting franchise. Voting is not electing. But that doesn’t stop anyone now does it? Voting here is only consent to standing under the State sovereignty as a principality, its majority political party, its representative(s) by agency, and nothing else. Only a fool would vote knowing his vote, no matter what, will only favor that which is opposed to him, that which enslaves him through word-magic and contracted dis-ease. Ah, the causality of illusionary choice. And every four years the charade is played out again. Billions spent. And only the bloodline ever wins. The game is fixed. The con is rigged. Suckers.

But for the continued benefit of tracking our great multitude standing in its collective idiocracy, let’s take a look at which blood relations are running for president this time around.

Below are various sources and articles for your consideration.

Shoot the messenger if you feel that will ease the pain and aid in the denial of your own disposition. One gets used to these things when one reveals the reality of things over their perception.

If you don’t know or don’t care why this all of matters, well, its not just  some deep and unfathomable conspiracy, it is merely the nature of this nation and of its political structure of sovereignty. The illegitimate and adultrerous (adult) public citizenships (that’s you) may only pretend to “popularly” (as goyim) choose between two of our already sovereign rulers (private bloodline People of each of the several States). If you don’t believe this or don’t know about who it is you pledge allegiance to (hint: it aint a flag), then just enjoy the irony and history and write it off as coincidence or as some degree of separation. You wouldn’t be the first. Or the last.

For the rest of you, put on your sunglasses with Hoffman lenses, and simply repeat after the late great Rowdy Roddy Piper when he saw reality for the first time…

“It figures it would be something like this.”

(Note: If pictures in this post do not show themselves, please see links provided.)

–=–

Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton: Candidates Are Related, According To Genealogists

Genealogists found that Trump and Clinton are 19th cousins, sharing a common ancestor from England 18 generations ago.

Aug 26, 2015

John of Gaunt, 1st Duke of Lancaster, married Katherine Swynford, Duchess of Lancaster, and John and Katherine are Donald and Hillary’s shared 18th great grandparents,” reports “Extra.”

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump and his Democratic rival Hillary Clinton don’t have much in common in terms of policy, but as for heritage, the two front-runners are reportedly related.

According to a report from the “Extra” entertainment show, genealogists found that Trump and Clinton are 19th cousins, sharing a common ancestor from England 18 generations ago.

Genealogy experts at Geni.com said the real estate mogul and former secretary of state are the direct descendants of the 14th century first Duke of Lancaster, John of Gaunt, and his wife Katherine Swynford. Swynford was Gaunt’s mistress but they later married and their children were legitimizedaccording to the Daily Mail.

“John of Gaunt, 1st Duke of Lancaster, married Katherine Swynford, Duchess of Lancaster, and John and Katherine are Donald and Hillary’s shared 18th GREAT GRANDPARENTS,” reports “Extra.”

Hillary Clinton is a descendant of one of their children, Joan Beaufort. Her brother, John Beaufort, is an ancestor of Trump.

And it turns out that their 19th great grandfather is King Edward III, according to author A.J. Jacobs, who studied Geni’s research. “So there is a precedent for ruling a country; it’s in their genes,” Jacobs told the television program.

During Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign, researchers revealed that she was a distant cousin of Celine Deon, Madonna and Alanis Morissette. They also found that Angelina Jolie is Clinton’s ninth cousin twice removed.

Perhaps more surprisingly, President Barack Obama and former Vice President Dick Cheney are actually eighth cousins, revealed Cheney’s wife Lynne in 2007 while researching her ancestry for her memoir, reports The Hill.

“Every family has a black sheep,” Obama spokesman Bill Burton said at the time.

Link–> http://www.hngn.com/articles/123246/20150826/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-candidates-related-according-genealogists.htm

–=–

Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton Are Related – And This is How

Posted August 25, 2015
Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton may be on opposing sides of the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election, but perhaps a new familial connection may help bring them a little closer.
Yep, that’s right – the current leading GOP candidate, Donald Trump, is related to Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton!
As revealed today on Extra TV, Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton are 19th cousins! The unexpected relationship was found through Geni’s World Family Tree, the definitive family tree of the entire world.

 

Donald-Trump+is+related+to+Hillary-Rodham-Clinton-former-U-S-Secretary-of-State.png

Their family trees converge at their 18th great grandparents, John of Gaunt, 1st Duke of Lancaster, and Katherine Swynford, Duchess of Lancaster.

John of Gaunt and Katherine Swynford are the parents of Joan Beaufort, Countess of Westmorland, Clinton’s 17th great grandmother, and John Beaufort, 1st Earl of Somerset, who is Trump’s 17th great grandfather.

Their relationship to each other is not the only surprise for the Presidential hopefuls. It turns out they are also related to royalty – King Edward III of England is their 19th great grandfather…

Link–> http://www.geni.com/blog/donald-trump-and-hillary-clinton-are-related-and-this-is-how-390111.html

–=–

donald-hillary-genealogy-2-395x1024-395x1024.jpg

Link–>http://www.conspiracyclub.co/2015/09/04/bombshell-hillary-clinton-and-donald-trump-are-cousins/

–=–

Obama, Clinton and McCain have some famous relations

…McCain is a sixth cousin of first lady Laura Bush…

Obama has a prolific presidential lineage that features Democrats and Republicans. His distant cousins include President George W. Bush and his father, George H.W. Bush, Gerald Ford, Lyndon Johnson, Harry S. Truman and James Madison. Other Obama cousins include Vice President Dick Cheney, British Prime Minister Sir Winston Churchill and Civil War Gen. Robert E. Lee.

“His kinships are across the political spectrum”…

Clinton’s distant cousins include beatnik author Jack Kerouac and Camilla Parker-Bowles, wife of Prince Charles of England…

Obama and President Bush are 10th cousins, once removed, linked by Samuel Hinkley of Cape Cod, who died in 1662.

 Link–> http://www.heraldnet.com/article/20080326/NEWS02/151343661

–=–

Obama and Bush are Cousins!

Hell froze over. A month of Sundays hit the calendar. Barack Obama and George W. Bush are cousins.

According to Factcheck.org, Obama and Bush are 11th cousins, both descended from Samuel Hinckley, who lived in Massachusetts in the 17th century.

Meanwhile, Obama is also related — even more closely — to Dick Cheney. They are eighth cousins, both descended from a French Huguenot named Mareen Duvall who settled in Maryland in the 17th century.

No word on whether the Obamas are going to be invited to the Bush family reunions each summer in Maine.

Link–> http://kristof.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/03/21/obama-and-bush-are-cousins/?_r=1

–=–

PRESIDENT OBAMA IS COUSIN TO SENATOR TED CRUZ

…President Barack Obama is a Democrat who was previously an Illinois Senator. Ted Cruz is a Republican who is a United States Senator from Texas and who is currently running for President. These two do not have a history of getting along very well. You might remember the time when the United States government shut down in 2014. Obama and Cruz held opposing viewpoints about that situation.

A.J. Jacobs figured out that Barack Obama and Ted Cruz are related to each other. They are cousins. It turns out that Ted Cruz is the husband of Barack Obama’s 14th cousin once removed. In other words, Heidi Suzanne Cruz is Obama’s 14th cousin, once removed

This isn’t where the story ends, though. A.J. Jacobs found that President Obama has 44 cousins in the United States Senate. Many of them just so happen to be Republican. One of them is Pat Roberts, a United States Senator from Kansas. Roberts is Obama’s 13th cousin, four times removed. Jeff Flake, a Senator from Arizona, is President Obama’s 8th cousin, three times removed.

A.J. Jacobs wrote an article for The Guardian in which he lists all 44 of Barack Obama’s cousins who are in the Senate. The list includes some Senators who are Democrats, and some who are Republicans.

For example, Mark Begich, a Democrat Senator from Alaska, is Obama’s 11th cousin, once removed. Richard Durbin, a Democrat Senator from Illinois, is Obama’s 18th cousin. Barbara Boxer, a Democrat Senator from California, is Obama’s sixth cousin four time’s removed’s husband’s grandson’s ex-wife’s mother…

Link–> http://www.familytree.com/blog/president-obama-is-cousin-to-senator-ted-cruz/

–=–

Obama has 44 cousins in the Senate. Now can’t we all just get along?

It’s been a tough week for the Obama family.

On Tuesday night, Barack Obama’s second cousin – a radiologist named Milton Wolf – lost the closer-than-expected Republican primary for US Senate in Kansas. Wolf and Obama share a relatively recent ancestor, a 19th century farm laborer named Thomas McCurry. Barack leaned left, Milton leaned right – he was a Tea Party candidate who believed his second cousin was “destroying America”. But still, they are, officially, kin.

So now Barack Obama is deprived of having a cousin in the US Senate.

Or is he?

I’m working with a team of researchers who are building the biggest family tree in history. And I’ve got good news for President Obama: it turns out that the man who defeated Wolf, the incumbent Kansas senator Pat Roberts, is also his cousin. Really. Roberts is Obama’s 13th cousin, four times removed.

In fact, we’ve found that Obama has no less than 44 confirmed cousins in the Senate, including Texas Republican Ted Cruz (the husband of Obama’s 14th cousin, once removed) and Arizona Republican Jeff Flake (Obama’s eighth cousin, three times removed). And more to come. In the next few months, we plan to figure out how all 100 senators are connected to each other. One big happy, dysfunctional family…

And admittedly, there have been plenty of political family feuds in the past. Franklin Roosevelt campaigned against his cousin Teddy Roosevelt Jr, who was running for New York governor, calling his record “wretched”. Liz Cheney and Mary Cheney are bitterly divided on the issue of gay marriage.

But there have also been many, many political families that found a way to work together and support each other. The Bushes, the Kennedys, the Clintons, the current congressional (first) cousins Mark Udall and Tom Udall, who have co-sponsored legislation with each other and worked with their second cousin, Senator Mike Lee, but not their double second cousin, former Senator Gordon Smith…

Then, a few weeks ago, I went down to Houston to interview my distant cousin, George HW Bush (just 19 steps away through marriage!). I told the former president that he’s eighth cousins with Bill Clinton. He seemed pleased. His wife Barbara Bush chimed in, saying, “I always thought he might be my son from another mother. So I’m not surprised.”…

All of Barack Obama’s cousins in the US Senate (so far)*

  1. Lamar Alexander (R-Tennessee) is Obama’s 14th cousin, thrice removed
  2. Kelly Ayotte (R-New Hampshire) is Obama’s second cousin nine times removed’s husband’s third great nephew’s wife’s great niece’s husband’s first cousin twice removed’s second cousin’s wife
  3. Mark Begich (D-Alaska) is Obama’s 11th cousin, once removed
  4. Michael Bennet (D-Colorado) is Obama’s 13th cousin, twice removed
  5. Richard Blumenthal (D-Connecticut) is Obama’s wife’s second cousin five times removed’s wife’s second cousin five times removed’s husband’s second cousin’s husband’s brother
  6. Roy Blunt (R-Missouri) is Obama’s third cousin seven times removed’s wife’s first cousin, five times removed
  7. Barbara Boxer (D-California) is Obama’s sixth cousin four times removed’s husband’s grandson’s ex-wife’s mother
  8. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) is Obama’s fourth cousin four times removed’s husband’s sister’s husband’s aunt’s husband’s second great nephew
  9. Benjamin Cardin (D-Maryland) is Obama’s ninth great aunt’s sister’s husband’s wife’s 9th great grandson’s wife’s uncle’s wife’s first cousin once removed’s husband’s nephew
  10. Thomas Carper (D-Delaware) is Obama’s 17th cousin, twice removed
  11. Robert Casey (D-PA) is Obama’s 17th cousin, once removed
  12. Daniel Coates (R-Indiana) is Obama’s 11th cousin, thrice removed
  13. Tom Coburn (R-Oklahoma) is Obama’s 15th cousin, once removed
  14. Thad Cochran (Mississippi) is Obama’s 12th cousin, once removed
  15. Michael Crapo (R-Idaho) Obama’s 16th cousin, once removed
  16. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) is Obama’s 14th cousin once removed’s husband
  17. Richard Durbin (D-Illinois) is Obama’s 18th cousin
  18. Mike Enzi (R-Wyoming) is Obama’s third cousin nine times removed’s husband’s eighth great nephew
  19. Jeff Flake (R-Arizona) is Obama’s eighth cousin, three times removed
  20. Al Franken (D-Minnesota) is Obama’s second cousin eight times removed’s wife’s husband’s second cousin five times removed’s husband’s second cousin
  21. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) is Obama’s 17th cousin
  22. Kay Hagan (D-North Carolina) is Obama’s 15th cousin
  23. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) is Obama’s ninth cousin, thrice removed
  24. Tim Kaine (D-Virginia) is Obama’s seventh cousin’s ex-wife’s third cousin’s husband
  25. Angus King (I-Maine) is Obama’s ninth cousin twice removed’s wife’s first cousin once removed
  26. Mary Landrieu (D-Louisiana) is Obama’s sixth cousin four times removed’s husband’s third great niece’s husband’s uncle’s granddaughter
  27. Mike Lee (R-Utah) is Obama’s 10th cousin, once removed
  28. John McCain (R-Arizona) is Obama’s 11th cousin, twice removed
  29. Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) is Obama’s eighth great aunt’s first cousin thrice removed’s husband’s fifth great nephew
  30. Barbara Mikulski (D-Maryland) is Obama’s 10th great aunt’s brother’s wife’s sixth great niece’s ex-husband’s aunt’s husband’s first cousin once removed’s wife’s niece’s husband’s first cousin
  31. Bill Nelson (D-Florida) is Obama’s 14th cousin, once removed
  32. Rand Paul (R-Kentucky) is Obama’s fifth cousin five times removed’s husband’s third cousin five times removed
  33. Mark Pryor (D-Arkansas) is Obama’s 12th cousin
  34. Harry Reid (D-Nevada) is Obama’s 15th cousin, once removed
  35. James Risch (R-Idaho) is Obama’s eighth cousin once removed’s wife’s first cousin’s wife’s nephew
  36. Pat Roberts (R-Kansas) is Obama’s 13th cousin, four times removed
  37. Jay Rockefeller (D-West Virginia) is Obama’s 12th cousin
  38. Jeff Sessions (R-Alabama) is Obama’s 12th cousin, thrice removed
  39. Richard C Shelby (R-Alabama) is Obama’s 17th cousin, once removed
  40. Mark Udall (D-Colorado) is Obama’s 10th cousin, once removed
  41. Tom Udall (D-New Mexico) is Obama’s 11th cousin, once removed
  42. David Vitter (R-Louisiana) is Obama’s first cousin seven times removed’s wife’s great niece’s husband’s second cousin thrice removed’s wife’s third cousin
  43. Elizabeth Warren (D – Massachusetts) is Obama’s ninth great aunt’s third great nephew’s wife’s second great niece
  44. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-Rhode Island) is Obama’s 14th cousin, five times removed

* These connections were found by researchers at Geni.com and WikiTree.com. We strive for accuracy (even more than the Senate itself), but if you have any corrections, please contact GlobalFamilyReunion.com.

Link–> http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/aug/07/obama-cousins-senate-family-tree

–=–

Obama Ancestry:

Obama is of mixed African and Caucasian parentage.

His father, Barack Obama Sr., is an ethnic Kenyan Luo from the Nyanza province. His mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, is a Caucasian American of English, Scottish, Irish, French, Swiss, German and Welsh descent. Dunham’s great-great-great-great-great grandfather from the maternal line, Christian Gutknecht (Goodnight), originally hailed from Bischwiller, France, and arrived here in 1749 with his Swiss-German wife, Maria Magdalena Grüholtz (1723- unknown).

Dunham’s eighth generation paternal grandfather, Jonathan Singletary Dunham (1639-1724), is of English/Scottish stock. His lineage can be traced back to Edward I of England (1239 – 1307) and William the Lion (1143–1214). Robert Perry (1785-1852), her great-great-great grandfather from her maternal line, is a Welshmen. Dunham’s paternal great-great grandfather, Falmouth Kearney (1830-1878), arrived in New York City in 1850 from Moneygall, Ireland.

Obama, through his maternal great-great-great-great-great-great grandfather, Philip Ament (1755-1836), is related to Lyndon B. Johnson, the country’s 36th President, who is the great- great- great-grandson of Ament. He is also the eighth cousin, twice removed, of the 39th President, Jimmy Carter, through his seventh generation maternal grandfather, Moses Teague (1718-1799). Interestingly, Obama is the tenth cousin of former presidents Gerald Ford (once removed), George H.W Bush (once removed) and George W. Bush (twice removed) through his tenth generation paternal grandfather, Samuel Hinckley (1589-1662). Obama is, additionally, the distant relative of two more former United States Presidents, James Madison and Harry Truman, as well as former Vice President, Dick Cheney.

Link–> http://2012.candidate-comparison.org/?compare=Romney&vs=Obama&on=Ancestry

–=–

ancestry1.jpg

ancestry2.jpg

Links–>

http://s217.photobucket.com/user/yankeerose01/media/ancestry1.jpg.html

http://s217.photobucket.com/user/yankeerose01/media/ancestry2.jpg.html

–=–

Presidents related to earlier presidents:

James Madison: half first cousin twice removed of George Washington

John Quincy Adams: son of John Adams

Zachary Taylor: second cousin of James Madison

Grover Cleveland: sixth cousin once removed of Ulysses Grant

Benjamin Harrison: grandson of William Henry Harrison

Theodore Roosevelt: third cousin twice removed of Martin Van Buren

Franklin Roosevelt: fourth cousin once removed of Ulysses Grant, fourth cousin three times removed of Zachary Taylor, fifth cousin of Theodore Roosevelt

Harry Truman: great-great-great nephew of John Tyler

Richard Nixon: seventh cousin twice removed of William Taft, eighth cousin once removed of Herbert Hoover

George Bush: fifth cousin four times removed of Franklin Pierce, seventh cousin three times removed of Theodore Roosevelt, seventh cousin four times removed of Abraham Lincoln, eleventh cousin once removed of Gerald Ford

George W. Bush: son of George Bush

Link–>http://www.heptune.com/preslist.html

–=–

Jenna Bush: Hillary Clinton and I are ‘related’ through ‘Uncle’ Bill – George W Bush’s ‘brother from another mother’

Former first-daughter Jenna Bush-Hager joked about her Clinton family ties at a charity gala earlier this week.

When former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton took the stage, she spoke about the ‘special feeling of kinship’ she had for Jenna.

Here’s some family ties you may just be learning about: apparently Jenna Bush-Hager is related to Hillary Clinton.

At least, that’s what the former first-daughter said at a benefit for the Save the Children organization in New York earlier this week.

Jenna was the emcee of the gala and spoke about the family ties she had with one of the evening’s honorees –  former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

‘I’m not sure if you know this, but Secretary Clinton and I are actually related,’ Jenna announced.

‘Yes, she’s married to by uncle Bill. Uncle Bill has become so close with my grandparents and my father…that my dad calls him a brother from another mother.’

Later in the evening, Secretary Clinton took the stage and spoke of the ‘special feeling of kinship’ she had with Jenna.

‘It is an unusual experience living in the White House and I am so proud of what you’re doing,’ Sec Clinton said. ‘So I join your Uncle Bill in telling you “keep at it”.’…

Link–> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2443961/Jenna-Bush-Hillary-Clinton-related-marriage-uncle-Bill–George-W-Bushs-brother-mother.html

–=–

Bush’s Famous Family Tree

It was revealed recently that Vice President Dick Cheney and Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama are distant cousins.

This week, thanks to a New York Post story about genealogy, we’re getting a glimpse at the rather surprising family tree of President Bush himself, reports CBS News Early Show national correspondent Tracy Smith.

We all know who the president’s father is, but what about his cousins?

Thanks to research done by Ancestry.com, we know that Cheney, the man who’s only a heartbeat away from the presidency, is actually a blood relation to the president. He’s Bush’s Mr. ninth cousin once removed.

Cheney’s cousin, Obama, is also Mr. Bush’s 11th cousin, and the ninth cousin of actor Brad Pitt.

But we’re only getting started: Abraham Lincoln was Mr. Bush’s seventh cousin, five times removed.

And Mr. Bush shared more than just a ballot with John Kerry in 2004 — that’s right, they’re ninth cousins, twice removed.

There’s also royalty in the Bush bloodline. Princess Diana was Mr. Bush’s 11th cousin, twice removed.

And then there’s this bombshell: Marilyn Monroe, known for wishing John F. Kennedy a happy birthday, is Mr. Bush’s ninth cousin, three times removed.

He’s also related to Playboy founder Hugh Hefner, Native American princess Pocahontas, and Vlad the Impaler.

Trace the family tree far enough, and you get Madonna, Celine Dion and Tom Hanks — which shows that genealogy can sometimes be like a box of chocolates: You never know who you’re gonna get.

Link–> http://www.cbsnews.com/news/bushs-famous-family-tree/
–=–
Some Famous Cousins of Senator John Forbes Kerry President George W. Bush
Agatha Christie 18th cousin twice removed 20th cousin 3 times removed
Alan B. Shepard, Jr. Half 8th cousin twice removed 8th cousin twice removed
Aldous Huxley 15th cousin 4 times removed 15th cousin 6 times removed
Alec Baldwin 11th cousin twice removed
Anthony Perkins 17th cousin once removed 10th cousin twice removed
Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr. 10th cousin once removed 9th cousin once removed
Bette Davis 9th cousin 10th cousin twice removed
Bing Crosby Half 9th cousin once removed
Bridget Fonda 8th cousin
Brigham Young 11th cousin 4 times removed 5th cousin 6 times removed
Brooke Shields 22nd cousin once removed 11th cousin
Bruce Harrison 16th cousin once removed 20th cousin
Charles Darwin 11th cousin 4 times removed 14th cousin 5 times removed
Clara Barton 8th cousin 3 times removed 6th cousin 6 times removed
Clint Eastwood 10th cousin once removed 18th cousin
David Crosby 17th cousin once removed 8th cousin once removed
Emily Dickinson 8th cousin once removed 5th cousin 5 times removed
Ernest Hemingway 20th cousin twice removed 22nd cousin once removed
Francis Scott Key 11th cousin 3 times removed 13th cousin 6 times removed
Gary Trudeau 9th cousin once removed
George Orwell 15th cousin twice removed 12th cousin 8 times removed
Georgia O’Keeffe 14th cousin once removed 9th cousin 3 times removed
General Benedict Arnold Half 16th cousin once removed 4th cousin 8 times removed
General Douglas MacArthur 8th cousin once removed Half 14th cousin 5 times removed
General George Patton 13th cousin once removed 17th cousin twice removed
General Robert E. Lee 11th cousin 3 times removed 11th cousin 7 times removed
General Tom Thumb 7th cousin 5 times removed
George Gilder Half 23rd cousin 8th cousin 3 times removed
George Plimpton 9th cousin twice removed
Glenn Close 10th cousin twice removed
Governor Howard Dean 9th cousin 9th cousin
Grandma Moses Half 10th cousin once removed 7th cousin 5 times removed
Henry David Thoreau 19th cousin once removed 5th cousin 6 times removed
Henry Wadsworth Longfellow 20th cousin 4th cousin 5 times removed
Hugh Hefner 9th cousin once removed 9th cousin twice removed
Humphrey Bogart Half 8th cousin once removed 8th cousin once removed
J. P. Morgan 6th cousin 3 times removed 7th cousin 4 times removed
Jack London 8th cousin once removed Half 15th cousin 4 times removed
Jamie Lee Curtis Half 19th cousin 3 times removed 10th cousin once removed
Jane Wyatt 16th cousin twice removed 7th cousin twice removed
Joanne Woodward 20th cousin 3 times removed Half 18th cousin
John D. Rockefeller 16th cousin 8th cousin 3 times removed
John Hinckley, Jr. 10th cousin once removed 9th cousin
Johnny Appleseed Half 5th cousin 4 times removed 6th cousin 6 times removed
Johnny Carson Half 17th cousin 5 times removed 10th cousin 4 times removed
Joseph Smith, Jr. 6th cousin 6 times removed
Julie Harris 10th cousin
Katharine Hepburn 10th cousin once removed 10th cousin twice removed
L. Ron Hubbard 10th cousin
Lee Marvin 14th cousin once removed 18th cousin once removed
Louisa May Alcott 25th cousin 4th cousin 4 times removed
Lucille “I Love Lucy” Ball 17th cousin twice removed 18th cousin 3 times removed
Margaret Mead 9th cousin once removed
Marilyn Monroe 9th cousin once removed 9th cousin twice removed
Marjorie Merriwether Post 12th cousin twice removed 7th cousin 5 times removed
Marshall Field V 15th cousin 4 times removed 10th cousin once removed
Meriwether Lewis  14th cousin 12th cousin 8 times removed
Michael Douglas 16th cousin twice removed 9th cousin
Montgomery Clift Half 12th cousin 5 times removed 6th cousin 4 times removed
Napoleon 10th cousin 6 times removed Half 12th cousin 6 times removed
Norman Rockwell 9th cousin twice removed Half 8th cousin 3 times removed
Oliver Platt 17th cousin twice removed 12th cousin
Olivia de Havilland 13th cousin 3 times removed Half 12th cousin 5 times removed
Orson Welles 10th cousin once removed 9th cousin 3 times removed
Pat Buchanan 10th cousin once removed
Pope Gregorius X 4th cousin 22 times removed 4th cousin 26 times removed
President George Walker Bush 9th cousin twice removed Self
Prince Emanuel Filiberto of Italy Half 16th cousin twice removed Half 18th cousin
Prince Leka II of the Albanians 23rd cousin once removed 10th cousin
Prince Felipe of Spain Half 16th cousin twice removed Half 18th cousin
Princess Alexandra of Greece Half 15th cousin once removed Half 15th cousin 3 times removed
Princess Diana 12th cousin twice removed 11th cousin once removed
Princess Margarita of Romania Half 16th cousin once removed Half 17th cousin once removed
Princess Victoria of Sweden Half 12th cousin twice removed Half 18th cousin
Queen Elizabeth II Half 12th cousin twice removed 13th cousin twice removed
Ralph Waldo Emerson 7th cousin 4 times removed 5th cousin 5 times removed
Robert Louis Stevenson 17th cousin once removed 18th cousin once removed
Sarah Ferguson Half 11th cousin 3 times removed 14th cousin
Senator Bob Graham 9th cousin once removed
Senator John Edwards 9th cousin
Senator John Forbes Kerry Self 9th cousin twice removed
Senator Orin Hatch 8th cousin once removed
Sigourney Weaver 10th cousin once removed
Susan B. Anthony 8th cousin 4 times removed 5th cousin 6 times removed
Tennessee Williams Half 8th cousin once removed Half 10th cousin
Thomas Edison 6th cousin 3 times removed 6th cousin 4 times removed
Truman Capote 22nd cousin 3 times removed 25th cousin once removed
Walt Disney 13th cousin once removed Half 8th cousin twice removed
Wild Bill Hickok 2nd cousin 5 times removed
Wright Brothers 18th cousin once removed 8th cousin 3 times removed
Some Presidential Cousins of Senator John Forbes Kerry President George Walker Bush
President John Quincy Adams 6th cousin 4 times removed 5th cousin 6 times removed
President Chester A. Arthur 6th cousin 5 times removed
President James Buchanan 11th cousin 7 times removed 11th cousin 7 times removed
Vice President Aaron Burr 5th cousin 6 times removed 6th cousin 8 times removed
President George Herbert Walker Bush 9th cousin once removed Father
President Jimmy Carter 9th cousin once removed 14th cousin 6 times removed
Vice President Dick Cheney 25th cousin once removed Half 10th cousin
President Grover Cleveland 12th cousin twice removed 7th cousin 3 times removed
Vice President George Clinton Half 7th cousin 5 times removed 8th cousin 14 times removed
President Calvin Coolidge 8th cousin once removed 6th cousin 3 times removed
Vice President George Mifflin Dallas Half 21st cousin Half 21st cousin 3 times removed
Vice President Charles Gates Dawes 5th cousin twice removed 6th cousin twice removed
Vice President Charles W. Fairbanks 18th cousin twice removed 6th cousin 4 times removed
President Millard Fillmore 4th cousin 6 times removed
President Gerald Ford 14th cousin 7th cousin once removed
President James A. Garfield 8th cousin 4 times removed 4th cousin 4 times removed
President Ulysses S. Grant 12th cousin 6 times removed 6th cousin 6 times removed
Vice President Hannibal Hamlin 7th cousin 4 times removed 5th cousin 5 times removed
President Warren G. Harding 18th cousin once removed 19th cousin 4 times removed
President Benjamin Harrison 6th cousin 5 times removed 12th cousin 6 times removed
President William Henry Harrison 11th cousin 5 times removed 10th cousin 8 times removed
President Rutherford B. Hayes Half 6th cousin twice removed 6th cousin 3 times removed
Vice President Garret Hobart Half 7th cousin twice removed 7th cousin 3 times removed
President Herbert Hoover Half 8th cousin twice removed 7th cousin 5 times removed
President Thomas Jefferson 11th cousin 5 times removed 12th cousin 7 times removed
President Abraham Lincoln 20th cousin 7th cousin 5 times removed
President James Madison 13th cousin 7 times removed 8th cousin 8 times removed
President James Monroe Half 11th cousin 6 times removed 12th cousin 7 times removed
Vice President Levi Parsons Morton Half 12th cousin once removed 6th cousin 6 times removed
President Richard Nixon 9th cousin once removed 9th cousin twice removed
President Franklin Pierce Half 12th cousin 5th cousin 5 times removed
President James Knox Polk 13th cousin 4 times removed Half 14th cousin 4 times removed
Vice President James Danforth Quayle 15th cousin 3 times removed 10th cousin once removed
Vice President Nelson Rockefeller Half 8th cousin 10th cousin once removed
President Franklin D. Roosevelt 4th cousin twice removed  6th cousin 4 times removed
President Theodore Roosevelt 15th cousin twice removed 7th cousin 4 times removed
Vice President James S. Sherman 9th cousin 3 times removed 6th cousin 5 times removed
President William Howard Taft 6th cousin twice removed 5th cousin 4 times removed
President Zachary Taylor 13th cousin 4 times removed 10th cousin 10 times removed
Vice President Henry Agard Wallace 20th cousin twice removed 10th cousin twice removed
President George Washington 8th cousin 5 times removed 11th cousin 8 times removed

Link–> http://www.familyforest.com/Kerry_Bush_Cousins.html

–=–

Some Famous Ancestors of
Senator John Forbes Kerry
President George W. Bush
King Constantine I of Alba
(B)
31st great-grandfather
33rd great-grandfather
Marc Anthony
55th great-grandfather
55th great-grandfather
King Ramiro I of Aragon
27th great-grandfather
30th great-grandfather
King Eochaid IV the Venomous of Argyll
34th great-grandfather
37th great-grandfather
Count Alfonso Ordonez of Asturias
29th great-grandfather
32nd great-grandfather
King Saint Sigebert III of Austrasia
36th great-grandfather
39th great-grandfather
Duke Leopold III the Saint of Austria
25th great-grandfather
28th great-grandfather
Count Raymund I of Barcelona
28th great-grandfather
31st great-grandfather
Duke Heinrich VII the Black of Bavaria
25th great-grandfather
28th great-grandfather
Earl Hugh “The Surety” Bigod
21st great-grandfather
25th great-grandfather
Earl Roger “The Surety” Bigod
22nd great-grandfather
24th great-grandfather
King Wratislaw II (I) of Bohemia
28th great-grandfather
30th great-grandfather
King Nominoe of Brittany
32nd great-grandfather
33rd great-grandfather
King Sisman I of Bulgaria
30th great-grandfather
33rd great-grandfather
King Chilperic of the Burgundians
42nd great-grandfather
45th great-grandfather
King Rudolph I of Burgundy
30th great-grandfather
32nd great-grandfather
Praetor G. Julius Caesar
58th great-grandfather
58th great-grandfather
Prince Uffa of Cardigan
40th great-grandfather
42nd great-grandfather
Count Severinus of Cartagena
41st great-grandfather
44th great-grandfather
King Alphonso III (VIII) the Noble of Castile
22nd great-grandfather
25th great-grandfather
Charlemagne
32nd great-grandfather
35th great-grandfather
King Coel of Colchester
47th great-grandfather
47th great-grandfather
Emperor Alexius I Comnenus
26th great-grandfather
29th great-grandfather
King Aodh of Connaught
39th great-grandfather
41st great-grandfather
William the Conqueror
24th great-grandfather
27th great-grandfather
Emperor Isaac II of Constantinople
23rd great-grandfather
26th great-grandfather
Duke Almus of Croatia
27th great-grandfather
31st great-grandfather
King Fergus Mor Mac Erc of Dalriada
44th great-grandfather
46th great-grandfather
Prince Bernard the Dane
28th great-grandfather
31st great-grandfather
Lord William “The Surety” d’Aubigny
23rd great-grandfather
25th great-grandfather
Earl Henry “The Surety” de Bohun
22nd great-grandfather
24th great-grandfather
Earl Gilbert “The Surety” de Clare
20th great-grandfather
22nd great-grandfather
Earl Richard “The Surety” de Clare
21st great-grandfather
23rd great-grandfather
William “The Surety” de Huntingfield
23rd great-grandfather
26th great-grandfather
Earl John “The Surety” de Lacy
20th great-grandfather
25th great-grandfather
William “The Surety” de Lanvallei
23rd great-grandfather
26th great-grandfather
Earl Sahet “The Surety” de Quincy
20th great-grandfather
25th great-grandfather
Baron Robert “The Surety” de Ros
23rd great-grandfather
23rd great-grandfather
Baron Geoffrey “The Surety” de Saye
23rd great-grandfather
Earl Robert “The Surety” de Vere
22nd great-grandfather
25th great-grandfather
King Roderigo Diaz of Valencia Del Cid
(E)
26th great-grandfather
29th great-grandfather
King Vermund the Sage of Denmark
49th great-grandfather
49th great-grandfather
King Saint Judicael of Domnonee
38th great-grandfather
41st great-grandfather
Nero “Drusus the Elder” Drusus
54th great-grandfather
54th great-grandfather
King Sithrich of Dublin
28th great-grandfather
28th great-grandfather
King Llyarch of Dyfed
30th great-grandfather
31st great-grandfather
Emperor Basilius of the East
31st great-grandfather
33rd great-grandfather
King Alfred the Great of England
29th great-grandfather
32nd great-grandfather
King Edward I “Longshanks” of England
(E)
19th great-grandfather
22nd great-grandfather
Baron Robert “The Surety” FitzWalter
20th great-grandfather
23rd great-grandfather
King Philip II Augustus of France
22nd great-grandfather
25th great-grandfather
King Marcomir IV of the Franconia
56th great-grandfather
59th great-grandfather
Duke Genebald I of the East Franks
47th great-grandfather
50th great-grandfather
King Eistein of Frondheim
33rd great-grandfather
35th great-grandfather
Count Gerald I of Geneva
26th great-grandfather
30th great-grandfather
King Elemund of the Gepidae
45th great-grandfather
47th great-grandfather
Emperor Henry I the Fowler of Germany
28th great-grandfather
33rd great-grandfather
King Constantine I the Great
45th great-grandfather
45th great-grandfather
Harold the Greenlander
29th great-grandfather
32nd great-grandfather
King Einion the Impetuous of Gwynedd
44th great-grandfather
46th great-grandfather
King Andreas I of Hungary
29th great-grandfather
31st great-grandfather
King Prasutagus of the Iceni
52nd great-grandfather
52nd great-grandfather
King Nial I of Ireland
42nd great-grandfather
44th great-grandfather
Emperor Berenger I of Italy
30th great-grandfather
33rd great-grandfather
King Jean de Brienne of Jerusalem
22nd great-grandfather
26th great-grandfather
Grand Duke Sviatpolk II of Kiev
27th great-grandfather
30th great-grandfather
Prince Kuthen Khan of the Kumans
23rd great-grandfather
27th great-grandfather
Emperor Romanus I Lecaphenus
30th great-grandfather
32nd great-grandfather
King Cairbe of Leinster
40th great-grandfather
42nd great-grandfather
King Ferdinand III the Saint of Castile & Leon
(E)
20th great-grandfather
23rd great-grandfather
King Audoin of the Lombards
45th great-grandfather
48th great-grandfather
King Lothaire of Lorraine
31st great-grandfather
33rd great-grandfather
Lord William “The Surety” Malet
22nd great-grandfather
25th great-grandfather
King Suibne of Meath
39th great-grandfather
41st great-grandfather
King Crida of Mercia
39th great-grandfather
41st great-grandfather
Viscount Eliprand of Milan
27th great-grandfather
30th great-grandfather
Earl Rogvald the Mighty of Moere
29th great-grandfather
32nd great-grandfather
Prince Grimald of Monaco
27th great-grandfather
30th great-grandfather
Duke Adalbertus of the Mossele
44th great-grandfather
46th great-grandfather
King Aonghus of Munster
43rd great-grandfather
45th great-grandfather
Duke Sergius I of Naples
36th great-grandfather
39th great-grandfather
King Sancho I El Reparador of Navarre
31st great-grandfather
34th great-grandfather
Emperor Theodore Laskaris of Nicaea
24th great-grandfather
28th great-grandfather
Duke Richard I the Fearless of Normandy
26th great-grandfather
29th great-grandfather
King Sithric of Dublin & Northumberland
30th great-grandfather
30th great-grandfather
King Harold I of Norway
30th great-grandfather
33rd great-grandfather
Prince Mstislav of Novgorod
25th great-grandfather
29th great-grandfather
Prince Mistui II of the Obotrites
29th great-grandfather
31st great-grandfather
Gaius Octavius
56th great-grandfather
56th great-grandfather
Odin, Founder of Scandinavia
54th great-grandfather
54th great-grandfather
King Halfdan the Old
31st great-grandfather
34th great-grandfather
Prince Colman Mor of Ossory
42nd great-grandfather
45th great-grandfather
King Winithar of the Ostrogoths
45th great-grandfather
48th great-grandfather
Count Robert the Strong of Paris
30th great-grandfather
32nd great-grandfather
Emperor Leo VI the Philosopher
30th great-grandfather
32nd great-grandfather
King Garnard of the Picts
38th great-grandfather
40th great-grandfather
King Miesco I of Poland
30th great-grandfather
33rd great-grandfather
Prince Kotak of the Polowzes
25th great-grandfather
29th great-grandfather
Emperor Constantine VIII Porphyrogenitus
29th great-grandfather
31st great-grandfather
King Alphonso I of Portugal
23rd great-grandfather
26th great-grandfather
Prince Brochmael I of Powys
40th great-grandfather
42nd great-grandfather
King Boso d’Auton of Provence
30th great-grandfather
35th great-grandfather
Count Walpert of Ringleheim
31st great-grandfather
34th great-grandfather
King Hroar of Roeskilde
40th great-grandfather
40th great-grandfather
Grand Duke Igor I of Russia
29th great-grandfather
31st great-grandfather
Saint Hermengild
40th great-grandfather
43rd great-grandfather
Prince Guaimar I of Salerno
31st great-grandfather
34th great-grandfather
Barisome III of Sardinia
29th great-grandfather
32nd great-grandfather
Count Amadeus III of Savoy
24th great-grandfather
27th great-grandfather
King Hulderic of Saxons
39th great-grandfather
41st great-grandfather
Duke Otho I the Illustrious of Saxony
29th great-grandfather
32nd great-grandfather
King David I the Saint of Scotland
23rd great-grandfather
25th great-grandfather
King Robert the Bruce of Scotland
(E)
20th great-grandfather
20th great-grandfather
Prince Guelph of the Scyrri
41st great-grandfather
44th great-grandfather
Prince Stephen Urosh I of Serbia
27th great-grandfather
31st great-grandfather
King Saint Cyllin of Siluria
51st great-grandfather
51st great-grandfather
King Dobromi I of Slavs
30th great-grandfather
33rd great-grandfather
King Chilperic I of Soissons
39th great-grandfather
42nd great-grandfather
King Athanagild of Spain
41st great-grandfather
44th great-grandfather
Duke Boniface I of Spoleto
31st great-grandfather
34th great-grandfather
King Ceretic the Gwledig of Strathclyde
45th great-grandfather
47th great-grandfather
Duke Otokar I of Styria
31st great-grandfather
35th great-grandfather
Duke Childebrand of Suabia
33rd great-grandfather
36th great-grandfather
Emperor Philip of Swabia
22nd great-grandfather
25th great-grandfather
King Eric VI the Victorious of Sweden
28th great-grandfather
30th great-grandfather
King Saint Olav III of Sweden
(E)
27th great-grandfather
29th great-grandfather
King Donnell More of Thomond
24th great-grandfather
24th great-grandfather
King Eistein Glumra of Throndheim
31st great-grandfather
34th great-grandfather
King Conal Culban of Tirconnel
41st great-grandfather
43rd great-grandfather
Count Milon of Tonnerre
29th great-grandfather
33rd great-grandfather
King Wallia of Toulouse
45th great-grandfather
48th great-grandfather
Duke Reginpert of Turin
39th great-grandfather
41st great-grandfather
Marquis Bonifacio II of Tuscany
35th great-grandfather
38th great-grandfather
King Eochan of Tyrone
41st great-grandfather
43rd great-grandfather
Count Hugh the Great of Vermandois & Valois
24th great-grandfather
26th great-grandfather
King Hilderic of the Vandals
40th great-grandfather
40th great-grandfather
Doge Pietro Candiano I of Venice
32nd great-grandfather
35th great-grandfather
Count Albert the Pious of Vermandois
28th great-grandfather
30th great-grandfather
King Olaf of Vermland
32nd great-grandfather
35th great-grandfather
King Olaf I of Vestfold
36th great-grandfather
39th great-grandfather
Eystein the Viking
33rd great-grandfather
36th great-grandfather
King Saint Kadwalladyr of North Wales
36th great-grandfather
38th great-grandfather
King Saint Canute the Pious of Wendon
30th great-grandfather
27th great-grandfather
King Cerdic of Wessex
43rd great-grandfather
46th great-grandfather
King Pharamond of Westphalia
43rd great-grandfather
46th great-grandfather
Count Witekind II of Wettin
32nd great-grandfather
34th great-grandfather
Lord Cynddelw of Yale
31st great-grandfather
31st great-grandfather
Emperor Romanus II the Younger
28th great-grandfather
30th great-grandfather
Duke Berthold I of Zahringen
28th great-grandfather
32nd great-grandfather
Count Otto II of Zutphen
27th great-grandfather
30th great-grandfather

Link–> http://www.familyforest.com/Kerry_Bush_Ancestors.html

The Absurdity Of Modern Free Speech


In light of yet another Talmudic spectacle of intentional despoilment of any respect America might have left in the world, isn’t it time to admit that from within the arsenal of complex patriotic weapons used as universal excuses for downright bad behavior, the free speech card has been well overplayed?

Watching the people of America being strung along like fiddles in quite forced romantic support for an at best mediocre movie before its release through a poorly-staged conspiracy worthy only of the lowest freak show display was painful. Despite the false dialectic of public outcry created by the now infamous ‘corporations are people too’ comment by Mitt Romney last election cycle – ridiculous not in its insanity but in its utterly soul-saturating truth – the collective dichotomy has now been sublimely shifted into supporting a corporation’s free speech in its release of a mainstream movie. For the doctrine of free speech is equally yoked in natural and artificial persons, thanks to the virtually unlimited exceptionalism given to the chartered 1st amendment.

No such demand would have been artificially created, plugged, and asserted through the magic of media trickery if the movie at question would have been a true historical documentary relating to a sympathetic view of Hitler and the easily proved false-history pertaining to the so-called “Holocaust.” In fact, even the very thought of public support for “free speech” as an excuse for the desire of making and releasing such a documentary film without protest or political barrier, provable as every fact would be, is a generally repugnant public opinion. For when push comes to shove, the responsibility that is implied in the creation of and thus use of this notion of free speech is being disappeared and then reappeared in the legal setting whenever it serves the interests of powerful men in their rewriting of current and past history.

Would a “comedy” put forth by the same two Jewish film-maker/actors and by the same Jewish-run media corporations with the plot of assassinating specifically the current President Obama through clandestine, covet means be acceptable free speech as well in this free speech society? By the current standards regarding “The Interview” movie it would. How about a snuff film about stabbing Mother Theresa to a bloody pulp with a crucifix, or better yet a splintery Dreidel? Does the amorphous, ambiguous term “free speech” also somehow protect such efforts in the purview of public opinion?

The question I pose today is a difficult one… Is free speech really to be considered an unrequited absolute?

Bearing in mind that the term “free speech” is not in any way defined in its constitutional proclamation in the articled 1st amendment, does the rational man truly believe that this is the legal version of anything goes? Can there be law without a foundation of some moral compass as a limit to the absoluteness of that law, especially when we consider that we are all forced to accept that even the most immoral speech is publicly acceptable because public opinion says all speech must be free and accepted?

And how soon will the element of freedom turn into the chains of subjection as the gavel of the supreme court resounds the new law that free speech and expression of opinion about certain Zionist factions only equals hate speech, as has happened in so many other “civilized” nations?

From both a logical and Biblical perspective, the answer is touted in support of the duties invoked by natural law (God’s law-order) to do no harm rather than to just accept this supposed unabashed liberty-without-responsibility assumed in the modern interpretations of constitutional theory. Here, Rousas John Rushdoony says it best in his foreshadowing warnings:

–=–

“…[A] society which makes freedom its primary goal will lose it, because it has made, not responsibility, but freedom from responsibility, its purpose. When freedom is the basic emphasis, it is not responsible speech which is fostered but irresponsible speech. If freedom of press is absolutized, libel will be defended finally as a privilege of freedom, and if free speech is absolutized, slander finally becomes a right. Religious liberty becomes a triumph of irreligion. Tyranny and anarchy take over. Freedom of speech, press, and religion all give way to controls, totalitarian controls. The goal must be God’s law-order, in which alone is true liberty.”

“Whenever freedom is made into the absolute, the result is not freedom but anarchism. Freedom must be under law, or it is not freedom…. Only a law-order which holds to the primacy of God’s law can bring forth true freedom, freedom for justice, truth, and godly life. Freedom as an absolute is simply an assertion of man’s “right” to be his own god; this means a radical denial of God’s law-order. “Freedom” thus is another name for the claim by man to divinity and autonomy. It means that man becomes his own absolute”

–Rousas John Rushdoony, The Institutes of Biblical Law
(The Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing Company, 1973) p. 581, 583–

–=–

As a rational man or woman, can the reader truly accept that this simple term “freedom of speech” was intended to equate to freedom from responsibility, ethics, respect, and from the very notion of the law itself? Can laws against such freedom of speech such as slander and perjury truly be subservient and bypassed by the right to free speech itself?

We have certainly defined the word freedom before on this blog, and so we know that political freedom is under the state of a false legal capacity. No matter which dictionary of law and court opinion we open, we find the same definition of the term.

FREEDOMLiberty; the right to do what is not forbidden by law. Freedom does not preclude the idea of subjection to law; indeed, it presupposes the existence of some legislative provision, the observance of which insures freedom to us, by securing the like observance from others. –Bouvier’s 1856

FREEDOM – The state of being free; liberty; self-determination; absence of restraint; the opposite of slavery. The power of acting, in the character of a moral personality, according to the dictates of the will, without other check, hindrance, or prohibition than such as may be imposed by just and necessary laws and the duties of social life. The prevalence, in the government and constitution of a country, of such a system of laws and institutions as secure civil liberty to the individual citizen. –Black’s Law 1st

–=–

The fact is that this notion of “free speech” in the constitution needs to be taken for its intent, not in its stretched out modern usage as an excuse for immorality and irresponsibility.

To be free in speech means to not be forced to say something against your will. This negative right, with regards to the legal setting, is designed to avoid false witness under coercion and to avoid self-incrimination, which means that the law cannot harm a man for speaking his mind or even the truth as a defendant or witness. Here though is assumed a sense of personal control and responsibility with our speech that it should not defame or arbitrarily defraud another, which the laws are clear to punish in perjury. And this free speech doctrine was not intended to apply to all aspects of personal life, only to political ones regarding rights and duties.

Does this specific notion of freedom from being forced to say something against ones will really imply too that a man (as a citizen) must thus allow any degrading, debilitating, slanderous opinion or untruth to be uttered at any time, tossing personal responsibility out the window while hiding under the false notion that all speech is protected by the god of the constitution; the god without substance known as We, The People?

This author believes the answer here to be no, at least with regards to the intent of the notion of what this doctrine of freedom of speech is with intent designed to protect. The concept of law is not designed to be used to force all speech upon others, any more than it is designed to force actions and political participation.

Frederick Nymeyer in Progressive Calvinism stated that:

“What gold is to money, the law of God is to liberty.”

When comparing this notion of personal responsibility with the modern perversion of the seemingly unlimited liberty of modern free speech, one must question just where the foundation of that doctrine may be found? Just as our U.S. dollar, as an unlimited currency, has no foundation in intrinsic physicality or morality (i.e. it is not “backed” by a foundation of gold) and is therefore without actual limit in its liberty of production, the currency of free speech in its projected unlimited capacity seems to be as well without foundation or principle in the modern era – totally misused, abused, and out of control! Both of these things seem to be killing us slowly; the bankrupting not only of our bank accounts but of our prosperity, integrity, and national reputation as well.

The public relations spectacle that was the Sony/Franco/Rogen/North Korea/Obama public opinion dilemma, as poorly played as it was, was quite effectual not only in positively publicizing the immorality and societal subversion of the Zionist Protocols of the Elder’s agenda, but also in the art of the swaying of public opinion without a day in court. It was a hoax of hoaxes; a successful subversion of reality and lawful intent. It was a typical American meme from the meme machine of Hollywood proper.

Should free speech be religiously used to protect all forms of speech?

Should this unlimited doctrine be protected even when the speech itself is offensive to law and freedom itself?

Should free speech be allowed to intrude upon the private rights of others?

And at what point does free speech become indistinguishable with forced speech, where you must hear it pumped into your living room and at work 1984 style and thus pretend to agree with it because the law forces you to accept and live by it as an unlimited right guarded by the thought police?

When is freedom actually redefined as objectified tyranny?

You decide…

And after your own contemplations, ask yourself why you allow others to define what is right and just in your own mind, what is correct and moral by the justice of legal code, and why it is that “entertainment” is now a legitimate title and excuse for pure unadulterated corruption and subversion protected by law?

The answer is simple and clear in all cases. Government is the supreme god (magistrate) from which all public opinion now flows.

MAG’ISTRATE, noun [Latin magistratus, from magister, master; magis, major, and ster, Teutonic steora, a director; steoran, to steer; the principal director.] A public civil officer, invested with the executive government of some branch of it. In this sense, a king is the highest or first magistrate as is the President of the United States. But the word is more particularly applied to subordinate officers, as governors, intendants, prefects, mayors, justices of the peace, and the like. The magistrate must have his reverence; the laws their authority. –Webster’s 1828

GODnoun – 2. A false god; a heathen deity; an idol. 3. A prince; a ruler; a magistrate or judge; an angel… 4. Any person or thing exalted too much in estimation, or deified and honored as the chief good.- verb transitiveTo deify. –Webster’s 1828

–=–

Is the law exalted too high? How about the magistrates as the law-givers and administrators? Do you as a subject of the body politic (e pluribus unum) even recognize that you worship the law of the gods as magistrates?

As the saying goes: Change your god, change your law… before God’s law becomes illegal.

P.S… This is what responsible speech looks like!!!

.

–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Thursday, January 8th, 2015

133 Nations Join Against United States Government


I felt that this was worth repeating…

The Hegelian dialectic is alive and at play here. Notice the heavy Agenda 21 language here referring to Sustainable Development and the stripping of wealth from Americans. Of course, the thought that 133 nations around the world are plotting against the United States and calling it the center of the New World Order should be alarming in and of itself. It certainly is not an untrue accusation by any means. But this does, or at least should, mean that the United States can absolutely not participate in the United Nations any longer. To do so would literally and absolutely be treason.

But when playing the dialectic, these little nuances go unnoticed as the people do nothing, because the end game is as it always has been, a new WORLD order through the United Nations, with the United States as merely a member in a larger nation called the United Nations…

…under an international banking system called the World Bank (http://www.worldbank.org/),

…under the mark of the U.N. World Social Security program called the International Social Security Association (ISSA) (http://www.issa.int/),

…stemming from the International Labour Organization (ILO) (http://www.ilo.org/global/about-the-ilo/lang–en/index.htm),

…overseen and improved by the World Congress (https://www.safety2014germany.com/),

…with the General Assembly forcing Obamacare for the entire marked world population (http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2012/12/12/united-nations-universal-healthcare/),

…and so on and so forth.

This is a repost from “Whiteout Press” – link – http://www.whiteoutpress.com/articles/2014/q2/133-g77-nations-vow-destroy-americas-new-world-order/

UPDATE: Germany just signed on, making the count 134!!!

–=–

June 17, 2014

133 G77 Nations vow to destroy America’s New World Order

 

June 17, 2014. Bolivia. The American and European media are doing everything they can to black this news out. But it’s not going to stay a secret for long. As of this weekend, there’s a new New World Order on Earth and its enemy is the United States, the EU, the UN Security Council and the world’s shadow government led by the IMF and WTO. This new alliance of poor countries wouldn’t be much of a threat, except it includes two-thirds of the world’s nations including China and India.

–=–

UN Sec. Gen. Ban Ki-moon (center) with host country
Bolivia’s President Evo Morales and 133 other world leaders
this weekend. Image courtesy of the UN.

–=–

It’s a sad day for the American people when their government and state-sponsored news industry blacks out such an important news story. Americans actually have to rely on outlets like the Havana Times in Cuba, The Times of India, and United Nations press releases. There’s a reason this news is being censored across the West. And it’s only the latest global news story over the past two weeks on this subject blacked out from the American people.  Read on to find out why.

End of the New World Order

When the richest and most powerful nations on Earth formed the G7, G8, G20 and the like, they united to combine their dominance over the remaining 175 countries that make up humanity. And for decades, the wealthiest 20 countries led by the US have gotten exponentially more wealthy at the expense of the poorest 175 nations, who in turn have gotten even poorer. That’s been the result of the West’s ‘New World Order’, led mainly by self-appointed global governments like the International Monetary Fund and the World Trade Organization.

133 of those 175 countries have had enough of the New World Order’s rigged global financial system based in New York and London. They’ve seen their economies destroyed by corrupt corporations and global governments that create a cycle of never-ending dependence and poverty.  They’ve seen their nations’ vast resources stolen by multinational corporations. Their agriculture landscape has been poisoned. Their citizens bankrupted by the IMF and Wall Street. And their democratically elected leaders overthrown by foreign agents from countries like the US.

They’ve had enough of the New World Order. And an alliance of 133 countries, two-thirds of the nations on Earth, signed an agreement this weekend to end the West’s New World Order and replace it with a fair, honest and legitimate World Order – one that lets everyone participate and benefit, not just the super rich.

The Next World Order

The organization is officially called the ‘Group of 77 and China’, but the alliance actually includes 133 nations. Showing just how much influence they have, their meeting this weekend in Bolivia was opened with a keynote speech by United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon. In the audience were over 30 heads of state from around the world and official representatives from over 100 more governments. Also illustrating the organization’s growing influence, China isn’t even a member of the G77, but insisted on participating anyway in a show of unity with the globe’s Next World Order.

Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro participated, telling the gathered nations they had to unite to, “fight for fair and sustainable economic growth and for a new world economic order.” Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa went one step further, telling the gathered national leaders and representatives, “Only when we are united across Latin America and united around the world will we be able to make our voice heard and change an international order that is not just unfair, it is immoral.”

A report from AFP on Yahoo News, about the only report found in Western media, describes how Cuban President Raul Castro also participated, but reserved his comments for a call to help their top ally Venezuela. Cuba, Venezuela, Bolivia and a number of South American countries have insisted they are currently under attack by the United States and the CIA, who they insist are desperately trying to orchestrate coups to overthrow their democratically elected, pro-socialist governments the same way they are accused of doing in the Ukraine recently.

Iran and the UN

An announcement published by the United Nations this weekend touts UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon’s enthusiastic participation in the G77 meeting. It discusses how important this massive alliance is to the goals of the UN, particularly with regard to reversing the world’s growing economic inequality among nations. Moon and the UN are also sponsoring a separate but related meeting of nations in September to draft new climate resolutions to be enacted in 2015.

The announcement describes a private meeting between the UN Secretary General and Iran’s Vice President, ‘On the margins of today’s summit, Mr. Ban met with the First Vice President of Iran, Eshaq Jahangiri, to discuss development issues, as well as the potential role that Iran could play in restoring stability in Iraq and Syria. The Secretary-General added that he looked forward to Iran’s positive involvement on climate change and said he very much hoped that President Hassan Rouhani would attend the climate summit this September.’ The report also says the two leaders discussed Iran’s nuclear ambitions and the coming July deadline for compliance with past mandates.

Threats of America’s “second Vietnam”

Many of the government leaders in attendance took the opportunity to strike a blow against what they consider to be the biggest enemy of world peace, democracy and economic freedom – the United States. One leader even went as far as calling out President Obama by name and threatening the United States with a second Vietnam.

As reported by the Times of India, the G77 conference’s host this weekend – Bolivian President Evo Morales – threatened the United States and the American President telling the gathered heads of state, “If Mr. Obama keeps assailing the people of Venezuela, I am convinced that, faced with provocation and aggression, Venezuela and Latin America will be a second Vietnam for the United States. Let us defend democracy, natural resources, our sovereignty and our dignity.”

Cuba’s President Raul Castro was possibly the most pointed and focused in his remarks regarding the agenda of the participating countries. As reported by the Havana Times, Castro told the alliance of 133 nations, “It is necessary to demand a new international financial and monetary order and fair commercial conditions for producers and importers from the guardians of capital, centered in the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, and from the defenders of neoliberalism grouped in the World Trade Organization, which are attempting to divide us. Only unity will allow us to make our ample majority prevail.”

UN Civil War – dissolving the UN Security Council

One of the more ambitious goals of the G77 and its 133 participating countries is the elimination of the United Nations Security Council. World leaders insist it is little more than a five-nation tyranny over the full UN body. With five permanent members of the UN Security Council having veto power over the rest, UN policies and actions have been dictated by those five countries – US, UK, Russia, France and China. Members of the G77 want the Security Council eliminated so the UN can go back to being a purely democratic body.

The Cuban leader went on to describe a global economic system run by American hypocrisy and financial corruption, “The principles of International Law and the postulates of the New International Economic Order are brazenly violated, concepts that attempt to legalize meddling are imposed, force is used and threats of force are made with impunity, the media are used to promote division.”

Dominoes beginning to fall

This is just the latest organized attack on a global financial system rigged by corrupt governments and the multinational corporations that control them. Just last month, Russia and China signed a long term trade alliance that represents the first major crack in the US Dollar bubble. The two countries agreed to stop using US Dollars in their transactions and instead use their own two currencies. The two largest banks from both countries immediately announced they would be dumping the US Dollar as well.

On top of that, the world’s ‘BRIC’ countries – Brazil, Russia, India and China – have publicly declared their goal of replacing the corrupted US Dollar with some other global default currency. Now that Russia and China have finally taken actual steps to do that, the remaining two-thirds of the world will most likely begin making preparations to stop using the US Dollar as well. It was only this weekend that 133 of them pledged to do just that.

The scary part for Americans is that both Washington and Wall Street have promised this would never happen, because if it did, it would destroy the US economic system and possibly the US itself. Read the Whiteout Press article, ‘Russia-China Deals move US Dollar closer to Collapse’ for more information.

To view a full list of the 133 nations that make up the G77, visit the Group of 77 website.

–=–

If this doesn’t wake people up, I don’t know what will!!!

The question is, do the 133 nations blame the government…. or the people?

.

–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Sunday, July 27th, 2014

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,768 other followers