Rowdy Rebel Jamboree – Oct. 23rd, 2021


I am formally inviting all of you to come out of your holes and embrace the freedom of private assembly that you were born to enjoy. My good friends Jimmy Coppolo and Daryl Wayne are throwing this one-day conference/social gathering free of charge for you, in celebration of the last vestiges of liberty this false paradigm of a legalist freedom-franchise will allow. Are you tired of the random videos and unknown voices of the armchair liberty movement? Are you tired of the patriot mythology and false history narrative thrown at you like a religious cult? If yes, then come out and join us for what may be one of the last chances you ever get to congregate and associate in the open. I mean that. The incredible and historical space Jimmy has rented, the Pitman Theatre in downtown Gadsden, Alabama has been reserved and the event is mostly planned. All you have to do is show up!

To those still spiritually awake and active, to those not afraid of their own shadow, and to those still able to break free from the molded lies we are constantly being set in, I say get off your ass and come out, meet and greet like-minded folks, and don’t let anyone tell you that you can’t!

Here’s the website: https://rowdyrebeljamboree.wordpress.com/

There will be live music between speakers, and who knows just who might get up and jam!

Considering this is a completely free event (so far without tickets), please do us and others the curtesy of hitting RSVP ONLY if you are sure you will attend. That link is at the bottom of the website. We will have to limit seating if capacity is reached, a problem we certainly hope to have, and we can generally plan a better experience knowing how many will show. It’s free, man, a no-brainer. And damn would it feel good if we filled that theatre up with the last vestiges of the lawfully rebellious! 

I’ll for sure be around as well on Sunday, for anyone that wants to just hang out downtown or take whatever adventure may result. Restaurants and hotels, many within walking distance, are listed on the website as well.

Don’t be afraid, don’t be intimidated, and don’t bear your moral defeat by staying home and wishing you had grown a pair for the occasion! Come join us for a celebration of life, liberty, and self-evident truth, and the good people that love and seek to share it with each other!

Website will be updated as needed: https://rowdyrebeljamboree.wordpress.com/

Lastly, we are attempting to get Judy Mikovits to attend as a speaker, but have not heard back from her. As she is not confirmed, we may need to replace her with another. 

Let me know if you have any questions…

I hope to see you there!

.

–Clint > Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Monday, September 13th, 2021

Wagging The Dog Part 2: The Story Behind The Story Of Covid-19 (Condensed Cut)


Introducing Part 2 of Wagging The Dog! It is not necessary to watch Part 1 before watching this condensed film, though it would be highly recommend to get that foundation of understanding to this story behind the story.

As I appear to be unable to embed at this time, here are the links for Youtube and for my second and active Red Pill Sunday school ‘channel on Odysee.com.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_45BtQMTq80

https://odysee.com/@redpillsundayschool:e/Wagging-The-Dog-P2—The-Condensed-Cut-(1GB):3

Note that download links are provided in the information section of those videos. Here’s a link for the smaller file:

Download Wagging the Dog Part Two – The Condensed Cut:

https://www.mediafire.com/file/av9pz1…

-or-

https://gofile.io/d/gJiHw9

For Part One of this film series, here’s the link (again, please download and share freely):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OzQ4u…

-or-

https://odysee.com/@redpillsundayscho…

Download Part One here: https://www.mediafire.com/file/evoh5d…

–=–
So what’s In This Film?
–=–

To put it bluntly, there is a war against Nature and you are in the middle of it, like it or not. Fight or suffer and die. Those are your choices. An organized and now institutionalized syndicalism called as “science” has infiltrated into governmental agencies, protecting their so-called “science community” and its bio-weaponization “franchise.” To be clear, it’s fully acknowledge that there is no difference whatsoever between basic (bona fide/peaceful) research, that is, what government allows to be oxymoronically labeled as peaceful or prophylactic weapons, and biological weapons creation of war. It is the same exact lab process. But if it’s done in the NIH, it’s somehow not called a weapon. Go figure…

After a short introduction, there is no other narration in this 2 hour and 10 minute film. What we do show is a mixture over several yearly meetings of NIH biosafety risk/benefit meetings on biological weapons and synthetic biology. In short, the government and “scientists” that conduct gain of function and other duel use research of concern tell us in their own words, from their own meetings, how an active biological weapons program is disguised as being for the public good and health, for peaceful, prophylactic, and/or for “bona fide” (basic) research. As shown in part 1, they first build chimeric pathogens in the lab through gain of function or other weaponization process, some of these being purposefully “evolved” and mutated into a pandemic and deadly state toward up to 100% of the population (i.e. apocalyptic ends) that would never actually happen in Nature. Once created, they claim to study these pandemic strains for peaceful purposes, for instance, to make a vaccine for what essentially amounts to a virus or other pathogen that does not and will not ever exist in Nature. Admissions lie throughout this film of things you couldn’t have imagined, in casual conversation, like being a fly on the wall in a private function. But these are actually public meetings. And among those admissions… a suggestion that most or all pandemics of the past have indeed been man-made.

In the end, an accidental or purposeful release would make SARS2-Covid-19 look like child’s play.

You won’t believe it until you hear it, from their own mouths.

Once you hear it, you simply cannot ignore it.

Please help to share and spread this free film and please COPY AND REPOST THIS FILM WITHOUT ANY PERMISSION NEEDED FROM MYSELF OR MATTHEW DECARLO. Post and repost as you see fit. Make it go viral, or else you might first.

Special thanks to my partner on this series, Matthew Decarlo, who has sacrificed much of his time helping me with my Bitchute and Odysee channel backups, as well as editing together this condensed version of the much longer Part 2 of this series. If you are looking for all of my latest radio interviews, please see those newer channels, as Youtube has been banning things on my main account. If they ban this movie, please go to these other “Red Pill Sunday School” channels on either of these alternative video sights (Odysee.com, links above).

In the end, this 2 hours of footage was cut from the full version of Wagging The Dog Part 2, which will be out soon enough (weeks?) barring any issues. In that more concise and total story, we take over 100 house of NIH discussion boards and cut them down to 15 hours. While this new condensed film (PRT 2) is powerful and mind-blowing, to have a full education on this not-so-secret Bioweapons program one must invest the time and energy to listen and learn. Only with a full understanding can this be fought against, and to be frank, I can think of no other important and imminent threat or cause to fight for than this. In other words, either you help make this viral and fight for your life or you become victim of something made viral and go extinct.

Yes, it’s that bad…

And no, common trolls and detractors, this is not about spreading unfounded fear. This is about reason, morals, and ethics. It’s about exposing the most deadly threat to mankind that has ever existed – SCIENCE!

I’m open and willing to any and all interview requests to help spread the word.

It’s time to get off your butts people, while you still can!

.

Clint > Richard-son (Realitybloger.wordpress.com)
Wednesday, September 3rd, 2021

Is Math Destroying Our Perception Of Reality?


(Author’s Note: This can be considered a slightly modified chapter for the distant release of my book called Gleaming The Matrix. With current events in synthetic biology and other insanities, I felt it to be needed right about now. Please enjoy.)

It is said that money, or more precisely the love of money, is the root of all evil. And yet, what is the sum of all pretended types of money if not the mere fictional representation of a manmade, fixed mathematical equation; a false, artificial valuation assigned by some pretended “problem” to be solved consisting in a non-existent form symbolized as some actual, Real substance? Value is a mathematical term. Sum is a mathematical term. Equation is a mathematical term. One, five, ten, twenty, fifty, and one-hundred, when describing money’s artificial valuation, are all mathematical terms. Simply stated, money is just math personified. This personification and artificial valuation is also known as the anthropomorphized god of mammon.

And so this begs the question: Can math ever be Truth?

If mammon is the metaphorical false god of monetary valuation, that is, wealth and riches, then it must be said that the underlying language art, logicality, and indeed science of mammon is merely mathematics. No math, no value. No value, no false-reality.

And so perhaps having and taking only one god makes a bit more sense when money is seen as just a problem of math, the term problem being as well a mathematical term. Worship Truth or worship the price tag of abandoning Truth, for Truth has no value to be worshiped. It is priceless. No amount of money can actually change or alter the Truth. And only the false perception of this artificially applied mathematical valuation can influence man to be the destroyer of Truth, to act against his own best interest, and to therefore become the satanic devil (agent of evil) he so fears. For with a false valuation in anything, necessarily, at the same time, comes an equal lack of respect in the self-evident, self-existent Truth of that thing. Therefore, the mere idea of mammon can ultimately destroy all things, but only through the minds and subsequent actions of the corrupted, delusional men it infects, for such a false god exists nowhere else but in the imagination of weak, mind-controlled (governed) men.

Even the so-called sciences have been corrupted by the worship of ownership value through patent rights, where science no longer studies Creation (Nature) but strives to reinvent Nature (Truth) in its own image. For the Truth cannot be patented. There is no value in Truth unless it can be kept secret from good men – this being the very foundation of all royal houses, their rulers, and clandestine secret societies. A false representation, a symbol, an artifice of valuation must be attached to the Truth for It to become the object of desire and greed. Only the image, not the Source, can be controlled by the power of mammon. And so men must be made to worship the image, the idol, the symbol of the Real if we are to be controlled by that false art form. Truth is no longer seen, only the artificial valuation thereof, making the Law of Nature untenable and without authority over the confused mind and spirit of the worshipers of mammon. For mammon is directly opposed to Nature (YHVH) and Its Law (LOGOS). These rulers and administrative governments (corporations) are not the bearers or protectors of Truth, for power only comes through the obfuscation and removal of Truth from any equation. Power, authority, relies solely, 100% upon on the organized, fictional artifice cast like a spell upon willfully ignorant men. Science is no longer done or published for the benefit of or from Truth, is no longer Natural, for mammon is become the god of corporate scientists. No profit, no science.

By all means, test yourself in this matter…

Do you see the priceless beauty in all things within Creation (Nature), or do you see only the false, monetary (mathematical) value assigned to it by evil men acting in incorporated institutions (artificial persons)? Perhaps you somehow see both at the same time, having two gods continuously pulling at your spirit in an endless value of self-control and empathy? The Bible is clear, do not worship anything of Truth (YHVH) or of Christ (LOGOS) with respect of persons (i.e. corporations). So should we put our trust in the Gold Fixing set at the Rothschild Bank in the City of London for the supposed daily market “value” of gold? Moreover, will even men of good conscious and moral rectitude ever be able to overcome this corruption of the mind and spirit, this root of all evil, in order to recognize gold for what it actually is – as a priceless part of Nature? If, when asked what gold is, your automatic, rote answer is some form of “money” or jewelry for show, then you may already be destroyed by your lack of inherent (True) knowledge, as predicted.

Do you measure land by its beauty and priceless Nature of self-Existence and self-Evidence, or do you measure it by its value in mathematically calculated acres, miles, hectares, feet, etc., as represented by the false, monetary valuation thereof?

Are trees a priceless treasure to be loved and protected, or are they a valuable commodity on the securities and exchange markets?

Are all men Naturally free, or are men merely some mathematical formulation of value as various forms of voluntary and involuntary slaves, subjects, employees… commodities to be used (employed) for mere sale and extortion? And just how do you decide which men are free and which have value? (Actually, that’s a trick question: you don’t. Your masters do!)

What is a spiritual awakening but the uncomfortable ability to recognize ones own corruption in the legal, mathematical construct of mammon? And what so-called “Christian” stemming from today’s corporate religions can say that mammon is in fact not their chosen god? Sadly, in this regard, Christ has no True followers, for the followers of Christ must worship Truth in all things.

Everything we see, feel, touch, taste, and smell has been cursed with some ultimately meaningless estimation of artificial, mathematical valuation. We pay for meaningless (valueless) sex, or inversely prostitute ourselves for that money. We eat bad food because it’s pretended value is less than good food. We are conned into adopting children of some racial ethnicity (family) not our own because they are somehow cheaper and less in demand in an almost black market of orphaned kids, a market causing its own need for child trafficking to support it. We purchase plastic bracelets that supposedly represent recycling, like a guilt tax on our own wasteful behavior, bearing them in false show of our non-existent activism, our hypocritical non-action. In the end, through these daily and lifelong calculations of worth and valuation, we prove our love of money more than Life (self-Existence) itself. Everything, every action, every duty, every promise, and every limit can be bought and sold like a financial instrument on the dark market of our wretched, reaped souls. All disease is contracted, and the sickness of poverty and wealth are certainly no exceptions.

Of course, this word love carries the more ancient meaning of belief in something, specifically in the “value” of anything. Another word for this type of consideration is affection:

–=–

MAMMONnoun – Riches; wealth; or the god of riches. Ye cannot serve God and mammon. Matthew 6:24. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

MAMMONIST – noun – A person devoted to the acquisition of wealth; one whose affections are placed supremely on riches; a worldling… (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

AFFECTION – noun1. The state of being affected. [Little Used.] 2. Passion; but more generally, 3. A bent of mind towards a particular object, holding a middle place between disposition, which is natural, and passion, which is excited by the presence of its exciting object. Affection is a permanent bent of the mind, formed by the presence of an object, or by some act of another person, and existing without the presence of its object. 4. In a more particular sense, a settled good will, love or zealous attachment; as, the affection of a parent for his child... 5. Desire; inclination; propensity, good or evil; as, virtuous or vile affections. Romans 1:31Galatians 5:24. 6. In a general sense, an attribute, quality or property, which is inseparable from its object; as, love, fear and hope are affections of the mind; figure, weight, etc., are affections of bodies. 7. Among physicians, a disease, or any particular morbid state of the body; as, a gouty affection; hysteric affection. 8. In painting, a lively representation of passion. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

FIGURE – noun – fig’ur. [Latin figura, from figo, to fix or setSee Feign.] 1. The form of any thing as expressed by the outline or terminating extremities. Flowers have exquisite figures. A triangle is a figure of three sides. A square is a figure of four equal sides and equal angles. 2. Shape; form; person; as a lady of elegant figure. A good figure or person, in man or woman, gives credit at first sight to the choice of either. 3. Distinguished appearance; eminence; distinction; remarkable character. Ames made figure in Congress; Hamilton, in the cabinet. 4. Appearance of any kind; as an ill figure; a mean figure. 5. Magnificence; splendor; as, to live in figure and indulgence. 6. A statue; an image; that which is formed in resemblance of something else; as the figure of a man in plaster. 7. Representation in painting; the lines and colors which represent an animal, particularly a person; as the principal figures of a picture; a subordinate figure. 8. In manufactures, a design or representation wrought on damask, velvet and other stuffs. 9. In logic, the order or disposition of the middle term in a syllogism with the parts of the question. 10. In arithmetic, a character denoting a number; as 2. 7. 9. 11. In astrology, the horoscope; the diagram of the aspects of the astrological houses. 12. In theology, type; representative13. In rhetoric, a mode of speaking or writing in which words are deflected from their ordinary signification, or a mode more beautiful and emphatical than the ordinary way of expressing the sense; the language of the imagination and passions; as, knowledge is the light of the mind; the soul mounts on the wings of faith; youth is the morning of life. In strictness, the change of a word is a trope, and any affection of a sentence a figure; but these terms are often confounded. 14. In grammar, any deviation from the rules of analogy or syntax... – verb transitive – fig’ur. 1. To form or mold into any determinate shape. Accept this goblet, rough with figured gold. 2. To show by a corporeal resemblance, as in picture or statuary. 3. To cover or adorn with figures or images; to mark with figures; to form figures in by art; as, to figure velvet or muslin. 4. To diversify; to variegate with adventitious forms of matter. 5. To represent by a typical or figurative resemblance. The matter of the sacraments figureth their end. 6. To imagine; to image in the mind. 7. To prefigure; to foreshow. 8. To form figuratively; to use in a sense not literal; as figured expressions. [Little Used.] 9. To note by charactersverb intransitive – To make a figure; to be distinguished. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

FEIGN – verb transitive – fane. [Latin fingo. The Latin forms fictum, fictus, whence figura, figure, also fucus.] 1. To invent or imagine; to form an idea or conception of something not real. There are no such things done as thou sayest, but thou feignest them out of thine own heart. Nehemiah 6:8. 2. To make a show of; to pretend; to assume a false appearance; to counterfeit... She feigns a laugh… 3. To represent falsely; to pretend; to form and relate a fictitious tale. 4. To dissemble; to conceal. obsolete. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

–=–

As I have attempted to explain within this blog, in my books, and on my Red Pill Sunday School series of lesson-based shows, the concept of what is Real (Truth) and what is artificial (manmade) is also exactly what the term God (as expressed in the “name” YHVH) was intended and is defined as, regardless of the false images of religions and the spiritless, commissioned artists of church and state. God is Truth. The Truth (God) will set you free. The temple of God (Truth) is in you. But the great destroyer, mammon (artificial mathematical valuation), kills the spirit and promotes greed and desire, want over need, and especially a disrespect of the Natural, priceless value (Nature/Self-Existence and Self-Evidence) of Life Itself. In other words, this false valuation of Nature and our own place within it causes men to believe they are false gods, with some dreamed up sovereignty that allows a total disregard and disrespect toward the private rights and sovereignty of everything else in Nature; toward the inherent right of self-Existence in all things, toward Life Itself. And this is why no man can worship both these gods at once, for one is the Truth of Nature and one is wholly opposed to and thus anti-Nature. One cannot worship Truth while caught in a web of lies.

–=–

“What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost which is in you, 
which ye have of God, and ye are not your own?”

‘Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you?”

“If any man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroy; for the temple of God is holy, which temple ye are.”

“And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people.”

–1Corintheans 3: 16-17, 2 Corintheans 6: 16, 19, KJB

–=–

Now go back and read these same verses, replacing the word God (YHVH) with the word Truth:

–=–

“What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost (Spirit) which is in you, 
which ye have of Truth, and ye are not your own?”

‘Know ye not that ye are the temple of Truth, and that the Spirit of Truth dwelleth in you?”

“If any man defile the temple of Truth, him shall Truth destroy; for the temple of Truth is holy, which temple ye are.”

“And what agreement hath the temple of Truth with idols? for ye are the temple of the living Truth; as Truth hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their Truth, and they shall be my people.”

–1Corintheans 3: 16-17, 2 Corintheans 6: 16, 19, KJB

–=–

Now go back and read these same verses, replacing the word God (YHVH) with the word Nature:

–=–

“What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost (Spirit) which is in you, 
which ye have of Nature, and ye are not your own?”

‘Know ye not that ye are the temple of Nature, and that the Spirit of Nature dwelleth in you?”

“If any man defile the temple of Nature, him shall Nature destroy; for the temple of Nature is holy, which temple ye are.”

“And what agreement hath the temple of Nature with idols? for ye are the temple of the living Nature; as Nature hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their Nature, and they shall be my people.”

–1Corintheans 3: 16-17, 2 Corintheans 6: 16, 19, KJB

–=–

What you cannot do is replace the word YHVH with the word mammon, or math, or sacred geometry.

There simply is no Truth (YHVH) in math. Math is not of Nature, but of the logic-based minds of men. The symbol, the valuation, is never the Reality. There is no truth in mammon. There is no truth in money. These are not of Nature. Therefore, there is no true valuation of Nature in money.

Translation: you must believe in money and its supposed value for it to exist. Thus, it is the LOVE (BELIEF) in money that is the root of all evil. With this understanding we can no longer pretend that loving money and using money are in any way different actions. Sorry…

The requirements for being Truth, that is, the requisite state of Being for anything considered to be of and under the Law and Laws of Nature (YHVH) include nothing of the art of mathematics. They cannot actually be purchased with money in Reality, only in the mind. Yet that artificial action of commerce and the flattering reciept of fictional, flattering title that is pretended to be Real is at the root of our trespass against YHVH and Its Law. These requirements, these inherent traits are, indeed, solely as follows:

  1. Self-Evidence – It must be a “Creation” of, in, and under Nature and Its Law, a Creation of YHVH (God). It must be Naturally occurring. In other words, the proof or “evidence” of its existence is not a requirement for its existence, but rather its very Natural (obvious/self-evident) inherent existence proves itself to exist. Thus, it is part of the Supreme Being (verb) that is Truth (YHVH). Nature (Truth) is self-evident in all Its parts.
  2. Self-Existence – Likewise, that which is REAL, exists only in TRUTH (without title, artificial property, or false valuation), in and because of itself (YHVH – I AM THAT I AM). This again requires no proofs stemming from man’s designs or language arts, for that which Exists does so despite what man names, references, or compares it to. A noun (name) is certainly not any proof of Existence, for a name (noun) is purely an invention and property of man’s imagination and language arts. Thus “Creation”, which is the ongoing, never-ending “Being” of Nature (all that is not manmade), and which is not to be confused with a single point in man’s limited imagination and artificial timeline of what “history” is, constitutes only that which is Truth, that which Exists or comes into Existence due to the forces and Law(s) of Nature.

What is adversary to Truth? Only one thing, actually, being that which is manmade.

When we look for an answer as to what an act of Nature (Truth) is, especially in the legal realm of artificial things, we find the same conceptualization of that which is self-evident and self-existent, the term Nature merely pointing to the Supreme self-existence of what is YHVH (God), a power that is not of man, is uncontrollable, unpredictable, and especially not mathematical. This power must be specifically defined by the legal system, especially in insurance policies, and so is referenced simply and Truthfully as an “act of God” (YHVH).

Act Of God – Event that directly and exclusively results from the occurrence of natural causes that could not have been prevented by the exercise of foresight or caution; an inevitable accident. Courts have recognized various events as acts of God – Tornatoes, earhquakes, death, extraordinarily high tides, violent winds, and floods. Many insurance policies for property damage exclude from their protection damage caused by acts of God. (–West’s Encyclopedia of American Law, Edition 2)

Act Of God – (noun) – A natural catastrophe which no one can prevent such as an earthquake, a tidal wave, a volcanic eruption, or a tornado. Acts of God are significant for two reasons: 1) for the havoc and damage they wreak, and 2) because often contracts state that “acts of God” are an excuse for delay or failure to fulfill a commitment or to complete a construction project. Many insurance policies exempt coverage for damage caused by acts of God, which is one time an insurance company gets religion. At times disputes arise as to whether a violent storm or other disaster was an act of God (and therefore exempt from a claim) or a foreseeable natural event. (–God knows the answer!, Gerald N. Hill and Kathleen T. Hill)

Act Of God – An accident or event that cannot be prevented by ordinary human foresight. The occurrence should normally be a natural one, like flood or earthquake. IT EXEMPTS A PARTY FROM STRICT LIABILITY IN COMMON LAW, an by definition, from negligence. (–Collins Dictionary of Law, 2006)

Act Of God – In contracts. This phrase denotes those accidents which arise from physical causes, and which cannot be prevented. 2. Where the law casts a duty on a party, the performance shall be excused, if it be rendered impossible by the act of God; but where the party, by his own contract, engages to do an act, it is deemed to be his own faulty and folly that he did not thereby provide against contingencies, and exempt himself from responsibilities in certain events and in such case, (that is, in the instance of an absolute general contract the performance is not excused by an inevitable accident, or other contingency, although not foreseen by, nor within the control of the party. (–A Law Dictionary, Adapted to the Constitution and Laws of the United States, By John Bouvier, 1856)

–=–

How then, may an act of man be an act of God instead of and immune from also being considered a legal action (done under man’s law in false persona)? The answer to this question is the definition of True Freedom, that is, Freedom under YHVH (Truth) and Its Law (i.e. LOGOS: the example of Christ). Unfortunately, what is not understood by most men is that the Law of God is neutral. In other words, it is considered as the negative law. This simply means that, while all of man’s legal law is called as “positive law,” or that which is added unnaturally to and in opposition of what already Exists self-Evidently (the Law of Nature), the Law of God (the Nature of Existence) stands in negativity, meaning that every man has the right to say no, to refuse the addition of anything not of YHVH, to refuse belief in and action upon what is not Truth, and therefore to remain pure and untainted in mind, body, and soul. The act of saying no is the highest act of law, for as the maxim goes, he that denies need show any proof. Only he that makes a positive (legal) claim must show proof, for whatever is claimed legally is always not self-evident or self-existent. What is legally claimed is never negative in its Nature. Man may only claim what is artificial, for man can in Reality, in Truth, own no part of YHVH, of which he himself is part of and the temple for. Freedom is not a positive claim. Freedom is the God-given (negative) right not to be governed (controlled) by corrupted men, by the artifice of man’s inventions. In other words, he that acts in and under YHVH (Absolute Truth) need never prove anything to any man or legal system, for the Highest Nature and Law is always behind his actions. Therefore his actions are self-evident. That which is positive is never that which is of YHVH. Only tat which is positive (artificial) requires proof. Math, as a manmade artifice, always requires proof, while what math represents in Reality never needs math to prove its self-Existence and self-Evidence.

To be clear, the only thing that proves math is math itself. Math is not self-evident. Math is not self-existent. Math is not part of the I AM.

And let us be clear, the only proof of the value of money is the willing faith that corrupted men put into it. Only when men stop trying to prove themselves through legal and other artificial means will men know God (Truth). But in general men have been tricked into believing in the false-truth of money, or in other words to love (believe in) money while considering “God” (Reality) to be false. Yet YHVH is defined as Truth, and money as a false god. How can this be?

–=–

Positive Law

Those laws that have been duly enacted by a properly instituted and popularly recognized branch of government. Postive laws may be promulgated, passed, adopted, or otherwise “posited” by an official or entity vested with authority by the government to prescribe the rules and regulations for a particular community. In the United States, postive laws come in a variety of forms at both the state and federal levels, including legislative enactments, judicial orders, executive decrees, and administrative regulations. In short, a positive law is any express written command of the government. The belief that the only legitimate sources of law are those written rules and regulations laid down by the government is known as Positivism. –West’s Encyclopedia of American Law, Edition 2.

Positive Law

Noun – Statutory man-made law, as compared to “natural law” which is purportedly based on universally accepted moral principles, “God’s Law,” and/or derived from Nature and reason. The term “positive law,” was first used by Thomas Hobbes in Leviathan (1651). (See:  natural law) –Copyright 1981-2005 by Gerald N. Hill and Kathleen T. Hill.

–=–

As stated above, an act of God exempts a man (or legal party) from liability in the legal realm under common law. In other words, as man is the temple of God (spirit), what comes forth as a result of the actions of any man, when done under the moral compass and Law of God (Nature), cannot be mistaken or contractually understood to be a legal act. An act of God is not punishable under man’s legal law. Thus, a True and Free (self-governing) man must at all times refrain from all that is not of Truth. This, of course, includes money (mammon). For the legal law is the manmade law concerning only evil acts, that is, the administration and regulation of acts against God (Nature/Truth), those not done under the Law of Nature, or more accurately, those that are not self-Evident. Citizenship is merely the organized, often pre-forgiven, administrated adulteries of men that cannot govern their own minds because their spirit has become legally dead. And there are no court cases that, at the heart of the matter before the court, do not equate “crime” with the artificial, pretended monetary valuation of that crime. Remedy is always in the form of mammon, for money is the only actual product created and administered by government. All money is property of government. Government is the host and beneficiary of the parasitic intent of mammon. In other words, legal courtrooms administrate only evils, never good deeds. For the maxim of law is clear that good and moral behavior cannot be forced upon persons.

The entire legal system is a franchise of mammon. Never forget that governments are the inventors and owners of all money, no matter whom those governments allow to print or pretend to create through debt/credit paper that root of all evil. Every court case has a monetary valuation attached to it, as does every person. But remember, nothing that is an act of God, including free men under God, can be made to magically “appear” in court, for True men take no persona (legal mask) and pretend to be nothing but that of a part of God’s self-existent, self-evident Nature and Law. Only legally invented persons appear, for they don’t exist in the Real world. The government may only control its own artificial (positive) creation, that is, persons. Thus it can only control men who act in a government persona (mask/status). This is the law of agency.

No game may be played unless those playing the game agree to the rules and thus pretend to temporarily become the artificial avatar those rules apply to. The shoe or car in Monopoly. The pawn in chess. Thomas Anderson in The Matrix. The legal system is merely a game, and you choose whether to play or not and what character to use. But when it is forgotten by the players that the game isn’t Real, isn’t of God’s Nature and Law, and therefore the avatar forgets he or she is a self-evident, self-existent man in Reality, then… well, welcome to the United States corporation: a soulless dystopia of greed and neglect. All hail mammon!

Remember, in law, a man is an act of God with inherent (God-given) rights. A man always has the (negative) right to say no, but only if he has not contracted a legal dis-ease.

A person (legal status) is a contractual engagement between a man and the state to perform a sanctioned duty, and God/Truth/Reality is generally no excuse for nonfulfillment of contract within that anti-God (legal) system. Thus a man of God that corrupts himself with contractual (legal) law is no longer considered to be of Truth (God) nor protected by It. From the legal point of view, and act of God is exempt from the legal (strict) law. What is of God (Truth) is never bound to the state. What is an act of God is never controllable by the state. For the state holds no power over what is self-existent and self-evident, the very definition of YHVH. Only through illusion and trickery does the fiction infect the minds of men so that the state may then effect Nature through them, acting on their behalf, leaving no actual choice, only causality. Choice only exists in the negative, not the positive.

Most importantly, we must understand that Truth contains no artifice any more than artifice can be Truth. What is not Truth is not part of God (YHVH), for God is only Truth. Truth and Truth alone will set men free. Persons are legally created, positive law vessels of enslavement, putting men under a performance contract, bond, and surety. Bouvier’s definition above shows that the constitution only protects from infringement the inherent (negative) rights of men, and that legal persons are not protected thereof, for persons have no inherent (God-given) rights. TO BE CLEAR, PERSONS DO NOT EXIST IN NATURE, ARE NOT SELF-EXSISTANT, AND ARE NOT SELF-EVIDENT. Persons require proof of identity. Nothing of or invented by man is God-given. Nothing of man is Truth. For all that is Truth is of YHVH. YHVH IS TRUTH.

This repetition of concept is not accidental on my part, and is quite relevant to the subject line. It is not religion, but Law. One must understand this difference to be free, for True Freedom only exists in YHVH (self-existence/self-evidence). Existing as a non-self-evident person in law is not True Freedom. All artificial, legal forms of so-called “freedoms” are man-made under contract, defined legally as franchises. Franchises (incorporations) are not of God, existing only in legally bound contracts (spiritual death). If these terms are unfamiliar to you, please download my book, here: strawmanstory.info

What is defined here as an “act of God” is not nor cannot be “proven” by mathematics or some other artificial means, but by the self-evident, self-existent Truth that God’s Nature and Design is ultimately not knowable to man, that is, the force that is an act of Nature, meaning an act of God’s Creation (Self-Existence), is ultimately unpredictable by artificial means. When attempted to be cast over Nature like a sophisticated connect-the-dots fishing net, mathematics simply causes the artificial feeling of predictability and therefore temporary, false-control against that which is not controllable by man. It causes an addictive, short-lasting god complex; one in which the typical math junky chases with maddening leaps and bounds while never reaching that perfect high of absolute predictability. Math loves chaos. Chaos is the false god of math. For chaos at first often appears predictable before at any moment spiraling off into what then appears to be randomness, all while admitting to the Truth – that some “unknown” Law (YHVH/LOGOS) is controlling it the whole time. Man may certainly predict the outcome of his own invention, but even the artificial law of man admits without doubt that Nature (God) is at all times a higher power than man… and therefore ultimately uncontrollable and unpredictable.

Thanks to the hubris and arrogance of mathematicians engaged in scientism, an inversion of Reality has taken place. In other words, God (Truth) has been relegated by the arts and so-called sciences as artificial, while mathematics has been elevated to God-like proportion and depth. Math has become to many the only path to enlightenment, a false light designed to express Truth proportionate to its own extreme limitations and faults. Math, it is said, is perfect. But can perfection exist in that which comes from such an imperfect source, that of man’s imagination? By definition, Truth is perfection. Can what is not of the self-existent, self-evident Truth (God) be perfect? Can what is artificial be at the same time what is the Truth?

Weather forecasting is merely a thinly laid pretext to weather control. Yet control is wholly dependent on predictability. And we all know how that’s going: it may or may not rain today… a 50% chance of snow… etc.

The question one might ask is this: does this term of the legal art, as an acknowledgement of an “Act of God,” in some way prove that God (Truth) exists?

And that would be a trick question, a practical joke we play on ourselves. It’s also the proverbial Achilles’ heel of scientistic mathematicians everywhere. Man’s definitions and titles, no matter what language, in letters or in numbers, are never anything more than just that – symbols of the Real. They are lies told to encapsulate the Truth within an organized system of falsity. For man in no way can Create Truth, only the fictions and symbols that represent It. Art is never what is Real. Art is man’s artificial reflection of what is Truth. When art is changed, damaged, or destroyed, the Real remains untouched and unaffected, for the Real is self-Existent. Likewise, when a person is declared dead, this does not mean the man that person reflects in legal status is also dead. The death of a man is a cessation of a vessel that carries Life (Truth). The legal (artificial) death of a fiction of law (person) is merely the end (execution) of a legal performance contract (art). This act, being not of God, requires legal proof in the form of a certified a death certificate that proves the birth of that contractual status (persona) to be ended. There is nothing of self-evidence; nothing of life therein.

Within the very intent and meaning of YHVH (God) is again the word Existence, as that which Exists despite man’s designs against Nature and Its Law. YHVH does not merely exist, YHVH IS EXISTENCE. Thus any question demanding an answer to the non-sequitur of the self-existence of God is mute, for YHVH is defined as all that is Self-Existence. What man invents cannot be defined as that which is self-Created, self-evident, or self-existent. A Creation of God Exists with or without man’s lowly forms of legal or mathematical proof, for man is as well a self-Existent part of YHVH. Man, in other words, cannot escape the Truth that all men are Creations of God (Nature), despite any attempt to prove otherwise.

The intent and meaning of the term YHVH was never meant to be debated or proven right or wrong. One cannot very well argue that there are two forms of TRUE (self) Existence, that which is in and of Nature (YHVH) found upon the Earth, and that which is of and in the so-called “world” of artifice, hosted by men and the designs we harbor against Nature (God) and Its Law. A Natural act of man is of course also an act of God, unless that man does so against God and Its Immortal and Never-ending Creation and Law, also called as an evil. What is built of man is always temporary, for YHVH is only understood as that which is Eternal, having no end and no beginning. This does not require belief, only the understanding that eternity is as well Self-Evident.

Any and all arguments, debates, and cultish sects that devote themselves to the non-existence of YHVH, that is, to the non-existence of the Whole of Existence (God) itself, can be understood here only to be an unprovable contradiction; a contrarian, nihilistic nonsense restricted to the realm of fools and their insidiously meaningless errands.

Enter the cult of the artifice and artful sciences of mathematics…

I recently viewed this short documentarian presentation that I highly recommend to all, representing a sort of final end all be all answer to the notion of mathematical proofs. Within we find that the three basic necessities or axioms that are apparently required in mathematics to be considered as True and accurate, those of completeness, consistency, and decidability, are indeed unable to be proven or evidenced. In fact, quite the opposite is True. The oxymoronic question then is this: can mathematics prove YHVH (Truth), which is Self-Existent and self-Evident, and therefore without need of such proofs of men?

Please take the time to watch this presentation, for it may be the most important thing you watch in this lifetime:

–=–

How does one perfect a system that is by its very nature imperfect?

Now consider the frightening Truth about what is the absolute best that any artificial intelligence can possibly be. At best, any A.I. will necessarily be incomplete, inconsistent, and therefore unpredictable.

–=–

A.I. Would you like to play a game?

Typical scientistic mathematicianYes, please!

A.I. – How about “Global-Thermal Nuclear War”

Typical scientistic mathematicianHell yes! After all, what could go wrong…?

–=–

The moral of the story is simple: math cannot uncover the secrets of the Universe (YHVH). Math will never tell the Truth. Therefore, any system based on mathematical language (art) will only produce artifice. More to the point, the only True equation we may take from this is the following:

MATH IS NOT EQUAL TO TRUTH.

GOD (TRUTH) DOES NOT USE MATH.

AND GEOMETRY IS CERTAINLY NOT SACRED.

–=–

Now before you get upset that I’m calling out your cult-like love of golden geometrical ratios, please understand that the point here is not that these artificial shapes and equations aren’t or can’t be useful. Please note here that it’s not at all ironic that we are taught to equate such a neato geometric shape with the ultimate standard of false valuation in mammon, that is gold, by the way. And it’s quite humorous to ponder that the market price of gold changes daily, therefore so too must the artificial value of the “golden ratio.” The point is that when men place the religious connotation of sacredness upon its own inventions and symbols, the Real is often lost to the symbol, the symbol taking upon itself an existence of its own; one not necessarily still attached to Reality. The worship of symbology, or in other words the holding as sacred of any language art (including mathematics), has today led to the worship of the symbol as a simulacrum. While once the symbol was a metaphorical replacement for something Real, being a simulation, it’s when the symbol becomes its own false truth that the simulation turns into its most corrupt representation of itself, the simulacrum. In the case of so-called sacred geometry, this logical fallacy plays out as follows:

Simulation – the symbol represents the real.

Simulacrum – the symbol is detached from the real and worshiped as its own image.

Thus we turn from the understanding that geometry is an artificial and always imperfect tool of the measurement of the self-existent, self-evident Truth of Nature, and begin to believe instead that the universe is a tool created with geometry, or that geometry is in fact a Law of Nature.

In all cases where man worships the symbol of his own making, the artifice instead of the Real (Truth), then the word sacred takes upon itself the inverse meaning of cursed. That is to say that when the artifice (lies) are worshiped as sacred truths, then all that may come from such belief (love) is cursed to be inharmonious with Life, with Nature and Its Law.

So what is the state of those that hold geometry as sacred?

In a word, idolatry.

To put it another way, God doesn’t do math.

–=–

SACRED – adjective – [Latin sacersacred holy, cursed, damnable. We here see the connection between sacredness and secrecy. The sense is removed or separated from that which is common, vulgar, polluted, or open, public; and accursed is separated from society or the privileges of citizens, rejected, banished.] 1. Holy; pertaining to God or to his worship; separated from common secular uses and consecrated to God and his service; as a sacred place; a sacred day; a sacred feast; sacred service; sacred orders. 2. Proceeding from God and containing religious precepts; as the sacred books of the Old and New Testament. 3. Narrating or writing facts respecting God and holy things; as a sacred historian. 4. Relating to religion or the worship of God; used for religious purposes, as sacred songs; sacred music; sacred history. 5. Consecrated; dedicated; devoted; with to. A temple sacred to the queen of love. 6. Entitled to reverence; venerable. Poet and saint to thee alone were given, the two most sacred names of earth and heav’n. 7. Inviolable, as if appropriated to a superior being; as sacred honor or promise. Secrets of marriage still are sacred held. Sacred majesty. In this title, sacred has no definite meaning, or it is blasphemy. Sacred place, in the civil law, is that where a deceased person is buried.

SACRED – (‘seikrid) – Adj. 1. Exclusively devoted to a deity or to some religions ceremony or use; holy; consecrated. 2. Worthy of or regarded with reverence, awe, or respect. 3. Protected by superstition or piety from irreligious actions. 4. Connected with or intended for religious use: sacred music. 5. Dedicated to; in honor of… –Collins English Dictionary – Complete and Unabridged, 12 Edition 2014

–=–

Money and geometry are religions, or rather what are instead anti-religions.

Money is not evil. The love (belief) in money as Reality is evil. Therefore, money can only be used for evil.

Geometry is not evil. The love (belief) in geometry as Reality is evil. Therefore geometry can only be used for evil.

That sounds a bit crazy, I know. Here is where the art of neutrality comes into play, which disregards beliefs and prejudices. Let us consider then what is evil? Evil is very simply that which is opposed to Nature (YHVH) and Its Law. All inventions of men are necessarily opposed to (opposite from, not the same as) Nature, meaning they are not self-evident or self-existent. Anti-gravity is certainly an evil, though it may be used for good. Geometry may also be used for good, but its nature will always be that of a manmade construct, and therefore always must be examined and considered as such. Duel use. To put it another way, the FORM of money and the FORM of geometry have no SUBSTANCE. What is of man is always merely the FORM of some SUBSTANCE that already pre-existed self-evidently. That is, what man invents and thus “creates” can only be the FORM of God’s already self-Existent CREATION (SUBSTANCE). Man does not and cannot Create as YHVH does. Here again we find this to be a self-evident Truth. If you don’t believe it, then please point to anything of SUBSTANCE ever invented by man that was not first removed from the self-existing Earth? I’ll wait…

Simply stated, the perfection of self-Existence cannot be replaced by the imperfection of invention.

Like any challenge to every cult or religion, this knowledge based on empirical evidence may come as a shock to you. Indeed, man’s design of mathematics relies wholly on its supposed ability to be used as a PROOF. But let us consider the Truth about this conceptual, manmade tool we call as math.

Firstly, I’m sure some of you have already relegated me into the same pit of despair that every religion does when someone challenges the validity of its manmade belief system. And like any religion, you may excommunicate me and put a scarlet letter upon my imaginary lapel simply because I questioned your authority as the spokesman for that mystical, unknown mathematical designer of the Universe.

Obviously, like religion, mathematics is a circular logic. It is limited to its own set, much like any alphabet. And it is designed to be this way, let’s not forget. It serves a purpose and can be very useful. But it can only be verified or proven by its own formally, proprietarily inbred formulae. And most importantly, nothing in Nature happens as a result of mathematics, though certain events can certainly be measured mathematically. Again, if this is a difficult concept for you, then please prove in Nature, in Reality, the self-Existence of the number 1. It’s impossible. Your only proof must come from a mathematical formula, for the number 1 only exists inside mathematics. There is no actual “1” in Nature. This is because there is no SUBSTANCE in math, only FORM.

Remember, what is of Nature and Its Law is negative (inherent). Inversely, what is of man and its artifice is positive (an unnatural addition).

Math, being a construct of man, can and should only ever be considered to be positive. What is added to Nature by man is not a Creation of Nature. A symbol is never Source.

You may be surprised to learn that 90% of what the Bible teaches is simply this: to never confuse, worship, or give undue authority to what is artificial (manmade) as if it’s the same as that which is of self-Existence (YHVH). Keep all Creation pure, including most of all the sacred vessel of God — the mind, body, and soul (spirit) of man. The Bible is a book of Natural Law, to be followed religiously (held sacred at all costs). Therefore, it is 100% opposed to man’s matrix of artificial, positive, legal law. Why? Simple. What is of man in any form is never the substance of God (self-Existence). Take the obfuscations and mis-transliterations of false “Christian” religions out of the equation, and suddenly the Bible is as beautiful and self-evident as Nature and Its Law. But it must be read only with the intent of finding and worshiping what it seeks to protect and hold sacred, the self-evident Truth. Like all manmade things, the Bible itself, while holding sacred knowledge, has been turned into a prop, furniture, considered only by its form without the substance it represents. The Bible, as the crucifix and cross, have become simulacra — mere symbols that bear no meaning, intent, or connection to their sacred purposes. This is what religion does to Truly sacred things.

Math is nothing more and nothing less than a very complicated yet logical written language. Unravel the form and mystery of The Matrix simulation to its foundational base level and all you have are mathematical symbols, each containing some artificial valuation, forced together in a controlled algorithm to pretend a false reality. Is that not also the description of 1+1=2? Does not such an equation, a pre-tended artificial valuation, need the agreement of both parties to be considered as fact? If I took these manmade symbols to any primitive tribe in the world, would they have any clue what they meant? More importantly, do they need to know the meaning of these fictional terms 1, +, =, and 2 to know the self-evident Truth about the collection of berries they collected from Nature? Do they need a word or symbol for these concepts, to live and to eat? Do they need to be able to draw out artificial plans or representations in numerical form in order to build a clay hut? Do they need to be reeducated to believe that numbers are “perfect” when their whole self-Existence has been in the perfection of God (Truth)? Do numbers cause Truth, or is Truth self-Existent? Do numbers prove Truth, or is Truth self-Evident?

Obviously math is not perfect, for math is a creation of man, made by men ignoring the Law of God (Truth). Yet turn on any math-based science entertainment show on television and, through special effects and visual technology (art), we see pictures and impossible images of the mathematical structure of the universe – a massive space that no man has been or ever will go. These shows have titles like “Understanding The Universe”, which is another way of saying that God (YHVH), which of course includes the self-evident and self-existent Universe as Its meaning, can be understood through mathematical equations turned into moving pictures of art (form without substance) invented by men from the extremely limited perspective of Earth. They actually believe they know what It is. And they attempt to remove the beautiful mystery of the unknown by replacing it with mathematical simulation, causing the delusion of false-knowledge for that which is not meant to be know by men. This religion of mathematical scientism, as what appears to be a purposeful side-effect cast like a spell upon the common group-think hive-mind, indeed causes that wonderous and unknowable mystery of YHVH (or as they call it, the Universe) to be relegated to just another conquest of man, like discovering America. Reality is all but ignored, the mysterious beauty disparaged by delusional, artful, colored-in renderings, causing the spiritual wonder and helplessness of man under the awesome and unfathomable power of God (YHVH) to be equally diminished. We don’t look up anymore to see the stars because the trillions of sources of artificial light from our contemporary designs against Nature have left the dark skies awash in a blanket of artificial illumination.

But let us take the example given in this documentary presentation above as our primary wake-up moment. It must be said first and foremost that, only when one limits oneself to the manmade construct of mathematics can one win or lose the debate. But then, one cannot claim to live in Truth and also ignore all Truth but what mathematics pretend. So already we find a paradox. However, for the sake of the point of the story, let’s speak directly to the foundation of all problems that man creates when acting against the Truth and Law that is and emanates from YHVH (God).

The scenario used is that all bearded men must be shaved by the designated “barber” of that town, no exceptions, and that of course includes the man that is the barber. And so, as the story goes, therefore the barber is unable to shave himself, for that STRICT LAW would then be broken, as the man would then be shaving himself instead of having the designated “barber”, which was the title of the man in need of shaving, do it for him.

And so the mathematicians go to work and find this to be a paradox. There is no way for the “barber” to be shaved.

Now, disregarding the sheer stupidity of this allegory, in order to show that this so-called paradox is in fact a false dialectic created by the same rules that created the problem in the first place, we must actually remove mathematics from the equation and remember the foundation of the Law of Nature (God). To solve any problem in Reality, the sum of some mathematical equation cannot ever be the final answer. In that, we find the societal and faith-based logical fallacies that are at the root of the actual problem. This is not a math problem, it’s a spiritual problem. And needless to say, there is no mathematical solution to a spiritual problem. Remember that it’s equally a self-evident Truth that there is no spiritual solution to a mathematical problem. They are not of the same realm.

Yet here we find the perfect example of how spiritual thought and action eliminates any mathematical problem that might be conceived or designed by man. To understand this, we must first understand that mathematics are designed to offer a non-spiritual view of anything. Math is not representative of God, only of man’s exploitation thereof. There are no morals in math equation. Why? Because there is no Truth in math equation. There is only the model, the cold form without substance, without Life.

And so, I can simply refer to the Bible, which states that men should never respect manmade, legally issued, or popular flattering titles, and suddenly this whole story becomes mute. In other words, just as the Truth is that there is no spoon in The Matrix simulation, there is no “Barber” in Reality. And it’s not that there is no spoon, there is nothing. It’s all artificial. Fake. Not Real. A simulation.

And so in order for this mathematical formulation to work, we must note that the Law of Truth must be ignored. That is, the fact that no man is actually, in Truth, a “barber”, must be ignored. The “barber” (flattering title/Noun) is a prop in the math script, and without that artificial construct of fiction, without that flattering title, no such mathematical problem would exist.

Math, like logic, only applies to manmade things. It should be apparent that what is self-evident (Truth) does not need external or manmade evidence to Exist. It does not need such proofs or evidence as can be provided by these constructs of men. Inversely, reason should not be confused with logic, nor should mathematics ever be used as the reason behind anything that isn’t manmade.

What we find is that there is no actual problem here in Reality, in Truth, and that only the artificial names, symbols, and titles that man assigns to himself cause any problems. If no man respected the artificial title of Barber, then no rule would be able to be formed. And he that has the skills linked to the flattering title of barber certainly need not use the title to use the skills. The skill, in other words, the action, does not need any title. No title can stop a man from acting, unless he believes in the power and authority and false law behind the title, and therefore that some authority higher than that title is the lawmaker, a false God. No title, no math problem.

The point of this is to show that no problem in Reality comes from a mathematical source, and so no mathematical solution can solve any problem in Reality. There is no spoon, just as there is no Barber. Yet faith in the title causes the need for manmade (non-spiritual) solutions to purely logic-based (manmade) problems, which ironically would not exist (as self-evident) in the first place without man’s foolish addiction to artifice. Manmade problems are never self-Existent. Manmade problems are a direct result of ignoring the Law and Laws of Nature (God).

To cut to the chase, the moral of this story is simply that negative spiritual problems cannot be fixed by positive artificial solutions, any more than secular problems are caused by True, Spiritual men of God. Lies cannot fix the Truth, for the Truth is already perfection and needs no fixing. Yet in all cases, the Truth can fix or eliminate the lies.

So how long will we keep lying to ourselves?

One thing is for sure, mathematics will not fix the damage men do to God’s Nature, and money will never buy love or spiritual pureness and happiness.

Be well…

.

–Clint > Richard-son (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Thursday, July 15th, 2021 of this artificial timeline…

A Roundtable With Dr. Judy Mikovits And Other Excursions Into Medical And Legal Madness


UPDATE #1: LETHAL INJECTION PART 2: A CORRUPTION OF BLOOD HAS OFFICIALLY BEEN CENSORED! A BADGE OF HONOR FOR SURE! LOOK FOR IT ON MY 2nd “RED PILL SUNDAY SCHOOL” CHANNEL, WHICH IS NOW ON BITCHUTE. I WILL POST IT HERE ON THIS BLOG TOMORROW AS WELL IF IT ALLOWS THE FILM. FILE DOWNLOAD LINKS WILL BE IN MY NEXT BLOG ENTRY IF CENSORED…

After being posted for a short time, the documentary has been censored.
Please stand by for the downloadable version and for a post on some other forum if I can do so.

–=–

UPDATE #2: – HERE AT THIS LINK IS AN ALTERNATIVE FILE OF THE JUDY MIKOVITS INTERVIEW:
https://www.transparentmediatruth.com/videos/Roundtable-22-Featuring-Sarah-Westall-Judy-Mikovitz-and-Clint-Richardson.mp4

As a backup, here is my newer Bitchute channel where the documentary will be placed next:

–=–

UPDATE #3: THE FILES FOR MY INTERVIEW WITH DEAN (https://www.deanreiner.com) CAN BE DOWNLOADED HERE:
https://wetransfer.com/downloads/a11856b08d50ebfceeb5201f2aa198d120201220082403/32dcce56499f63c5b36e6a39539b18b020201220082420/400d15/grid

–=–

I recently had the privilege of joining Dr. Judy Mikovits for an interview on Transparent Media Truth about Covid, the so-called mRNA vaccine, and other topics of equal importance. Please, if you or someone you know is planning to receive a Covid-19 RNA inoculation, especially if you are female, please watch this ultra-important interview. (Links- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dpYTxwnofZU) (Website – https://transparentmediatruth.com)

NOTE: THE LINK TO THIS BLATANTLY CENSORED INTERVIEW IS HERE: https://www.transparentmediatruth.com/videos/Roundtable-22-Featuring-Sarah-Westall-Judy-Mikovitz-and-Clint-Richardson.mp4

–=–

I was also back on with the Sholi-lama, Guber Mente 2020, a follow up to last month, speaking on a variety of topics including a deep dive into the genealogy of our illegitimate rulers and the usual shenanigans of that bloodline of parasitic vampires, as well as some more Coronavirus madness:

https://www.spreaker.com/user/sholzo/clint-is-back-w-shali-to-talk-aboot-mrna

–=–

I was on the Jim Duke Perspective back on the 6th of December:

https://tunein.com/radio/Jim-Duke-Perspective-p1005413/?topicId=159251275

–=–

Though not posted yet, you’ll find me soon on the Innerverse Podcast with Chance Garton, at the following web address:

https://www.innerversepodcast.com

–=–

Did the Spingola Speaks Show today as well, 3 hours of talk with RBN’s incessant commercial interruptions, posted here:

Hour 1: https://www.podbean.com/media/share/dir-v7ix4-c73c162?utm_campaign=w_share_ep&utm_medium=dlink&utm_source=w_share

Hour 2: https://www.podbean.com/media/share/dir-tdzwc-c73e3fd?utm_campaign=w_share_ep&utm_medium=dlink&utm_source=w_share

Hour 3: https://www.podbean.com/media/share/dir-rj8nd-c73e3fc?utm_campaign=w_share_ep&utm_medium=dlink&utm_source=w_share

–=–

Finally, I sat down with Dean Reiner, and though that hasn’t posted yet, it can be downloaded here for a short while till posted: https://wetransfer.com/downloads/a11856b08d50ebfceeb5201f2aa198d120201220082403/32dcce56499f63c5b36e6a39539b18b020201220082420/400d15/grid

Will be posted on the “Up Is Down” show at https://www.deanreiner.com

–=–

There are a few shows that were rescheduled, so I look forward still to being guest on the Higher Side Chat and Rule of Law Radio.

Remember to share!

Again, look for Lethal Injection Part 2: A Corruption of Blood tonight on Youtube, or come back right here to see it either posted or banned. I’ll let you know…

.

–Clint > richards-son (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Saturday, December 19th, 2020

Red Pill Sunday School S2 E3 – Strawman Book Pt.2


Greetings Programs…

Here, for your consideration, is part 2 of my audio/video book entitled Strawman Logic: A Choice Between Two Evils.

Part 3 to come in the next week or so.

Thank you to all that have donated to support these works. Books are in the mail.

Be well, all.

.

–Clint < Richard-son (Realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Wednesday, June 17th, 2020

Why Men Of Good Conscience Can Never Be Famous


The_Devil's_Contract

About 8 months ago, I was initially approached through email by a production company out of Texas to be on television. In my excitement, I of course told family and friends close to me without consideration of the events that would follow. It’s a horrible feeling to have to retract such statements of fact, that I would be interviewed for television. Oh, what a fool I can be…

They had seen my “alternative” interview on video games, how they’re made and their destructive effect on empathy and morality, and wanted to interview me on camera for a new “conspiracy” centric type of show. At first thought, I remember feeling cautiously excited, considering that the result of this exposure would at the very least have the positive effect of bringing readers and viewers and listeners to my various works. It was not by any means a paid gig, just an interview like any other of the over 1,000 I’d already done without any financial compensation, only this time it would be aired on television. My reward has always been the people I’ve touched, the extraordinary health of the children I’ve helped keep from disease-causing vaccines, and the various other comments and kudos I receive that keep me doing what I’m doing. Of course, there are plenty of detractors, contrarians, sophists, and the like, though they never seem to have much ground to stand on in the face of primary source material; no integrity.

I asked a few friends whether they thought this “appearance” was a good idea, that is, if I should trust such a Hollywood production considering the absolute shit that is on television already. The answer was generally no, I shouldn’t, with the exception of my always supportive immediate family. And on the surface, I agreed, especially after seeing first hand the hit pieces done to previous guests of mine in media. All around, involvement with that brood is just a bad idea. I should know, I worked amongst them for long enough to see it all for what it is. Yet circumstances led me to happen to be close to the L.A. area at the same time they would be, and they extended the invitation once more to meet up and conduct an on-camera interview.

I hesitantly agreed to meet, not knowing what would have been in store for me if some uncontrollable circumstances hadn’t intervened. They called and informed me that they couldn’t make the appointment. As fate would dictate, they had to cancel and again asked if we could do said interview on another date in the near future.

Some time went by, and there again appeared an email with a similar invitation, though I’d have to fly on my own dime to participate. Nice. I reconsidered the positive vs. the negative possibilities and, though erring on the side of caution, I again agreed to do the interview at some near, unset future date.

It was the next email link, however, that shone darkly in this strange chain of correspondences, and that’s what I’d really like to speak to you about today. For it was only then that they even mentioned and sent over to me any semblance or mention of a contract. And yes, as it turns out, my previous, seemingly unwarranted, paranoid fear and hesitation was immediately solidified into a well-justified validation of my former, precognitive, cautionary stance.

It is often said that those who appear on television and receive that delusion of fame are sell-outs, from stage actors to the music industry to the alternative radio sect. Of course, after receiving this horrific contract, I can definitely state that this perception couldn’t be more True. For when I read through that contract, I knew right then that I would be selling my soul if I took this interview. The violations of common, moral decency and privacy contained within this agreement juxtaposed with those that apparently have already signed it or something similar to appear on television (and you know who they are) should not be mistaken as good and conscionable men. And this fact can only be shown to you by reprinting that horrific contract here.

So why did I adamantly refuse with all my will, with my spiritually-driven mind, body, and soul to sign that devil’s contract?

Here, please read it for yourself and tell me what lengths you would go to for your own 30 seconds of artificially induced fame?

The names and corporations involved have been kept unedited so as not to protect the guilty:

–=–

APPEARANCE RELEASE 

For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, I hereby grant to Texas Crew Productions, LLC and its parents, subsidiaries, licensees, successors, designees, and assigns (collectively, “Producer”) the right to use my name, likeness, voice, conversation, sounds, biographical data and/or material, and editorial comments concerning me (collectively, my “Appearance”) in and in connection with the program tentatively entitled “STRANGE WORLD” (“Program”).

I agree that Producer shall have the right to create and capture audiovisual, audio-only, visual-only, and literary works, including the production of video and/or audio tapes, photographs, films, and/or recordings of and from my Appearance, including any performance of any musical composition(s) (the “Materials”) by any method of recording.

I agree that no payment shall be due to me for the use of my Appearance and/or the rights granted by me under this Agreement, and Producer shall not be obligated to pay me or any third party any compensation whatsoever, regardless of the time or method of any use of the Materials. 

I further acknowledge and agree that the consideration I will receive for Producer’s use of my Appearance and the exercise of the rights granted by me is the opportunity for publicity that I will receive if Producer decides to include the Materials in the Program. Producer is not obligated to use the Materials in the Program or for any other purpose whatsoever. Producer may assign its rights hereunder in Producer’s sole discretion. 

I agree that all results and proceeds of my Appearance and services hereunder (the “Results and Proceeds”) shall be deemed a work-made-for-hire specially ordered or commissioned by Producer for use as part of a motion picture or other audio-visual work pursuant to Section 201 of the United States Copyright Act of 1976, as amended.

Producer, or Producer’s agents and assigns, shall forever be the exclusive owner in all rights, including copyright, in the Materials and the Results and Proceeds of such Materials, and shall have the irrevocable right to use, and license others to use, the Materials in whole or in part, an unlimited number of times, in all languages, in all media whether now known or hereafter devised, anywhere in the universe in perpetuity in connection with all forms of exploitation, including without limitation, advertising, sale, promotion, marketing, merchandising, and distribution of the Program, other programs, or other products and/or services, including without limitation direct or indirect endorsements. 

Producer shall have the right to edit the Materials in any manner or form, and I waive any right to inspect or approve of any use of the Materials, including droit moral or moral rights, if any. 

Notwithstanding the foregoing, if and to the extent the Results and Proceeds are not deemed a “work-made-for-hire”, I hereby assign to Producer, in perpetuity and throughout the universe, in any and all manners, formats and medias, whether now known or hereafter devised, all right, title and interest (including, without limitation, all rights of copyright) in and to the Results and Proceeds. I waive the benefit of any provision known as “droit moral” or moral rights of authors or any similar or analogous law or decision in any country of the world. 

I acknowledge that Producer is relying on the representations, warranties and permissions granted herein, and my breach thereof would cause Producer irreparable injury and damage that cannot be reasonably or adequately compensated in an action at law. I hereby expressly agree that Producer shall be entitled to injunctive and other equitable relief to prevent and/or cure any breach or threatened breach of this Agreement by me.

I further acknowledge that Producer is relying on the permissions granted herein to the degree described above and hereby agree not to assert any claim of any nature whatsoever (including any claims for injunctive relief and/or money damages) against anyone relating to the exercise of the permissions and rights granted hereunder. I expressly waive any and all moral rights I may have in connection with the Materials and/or my Appearance. I also waive any claim or action for defamation against Producer and/or any claim that the Materials are, or may be claimed to be, defamatory, untrue or censorable in nature. I waive any right to injunctive relief and agree that I will not in any event be entitled to prevent or inhibit the exhibition, distribution, use or exploitation of the Materials, the Program and/or my Appearance therein. I waive any right to terminate or rescind this agreement. The termination of this Agreement, for any reason, shall not affect Producer’s rights in the Results and Proceeds of the taping, filming and photography, the Materials or my Appearance. This paragraph shall survive the termination or the expiration of this Agreement. 

I agree to release, defend, indemnify and hold Producer and the exhibiting network and their respective affiliates, successors and assigns, and the officers, directors, employees, agents and representatives thereof (collectively, the “Producer Parties”), harmless from any and all claims, demands, costs (including attorneys’ fees) and causes of action of any kind or nature whatsoever now and in the future, including, without limitation, defamation, bodily harm, infliction of emotional distress and invasion of privacy, property damage, rights of publicity, commercial disparagement, and/or infringement of any other proprietary and/or personal rights arising out of or in connection with my Appearance, statements and/or actions in or creation of the Materials and/or the Program.

I acknowledge that there is a possibility that subsequent to the execution of this Agreement, I may discover facts or incur or suffer claims which were unknown or unsuspected at the time this Agreement was executed, and which if known by me at that time may have materially affected my decision to execute this Agreement. I acknowledge and agree that by reason of this Agreement, and the releases contained in the preceding paragraphs, I am assuming any risk of such unknown facts and such unknown and unsuspected claims. 

Additionally, I acknowledge awareness of and hereby waive any rights and benefits afforded by California Civil Code Section 1542, which provides: A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS WHICH THE CREDITOR DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS OR HER FAVOR AT THE TIME OF EXECUTING THE RELEASE, WHICH IF KNOWN BY HIM OR HER MUST HAVE MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR.

I represent and warrant that: (i) I have the full power and right to make and perform this agreement and the consent of no other person or entity is necessary to grant the rights hereunder; (ii) I have not given or agreed to give any member of the production staff or anyone associated in any manner with the Program or any representative of Producer anything of value to arrange my appearance in the Program or the advertisements therefor; and (iii) any statements made by me during my Appearance are true to the best of my knowledge, and neither they nor my Appearance will violate or infringe upon the rights of Producer or any third party.

I acknowledge and agree that (i) this is a non-union agreement and that my participation and Appearance hereunder shall not be subject to the terms of any collective bargaining agreement; and (ii) Producer is not a signatory to any collective bargaining agreement covering my participation and Appearance hereunder.

I acknowledge that in connection with my participation in the Program, confidential and/or proprietary information of Producer and/or the Program (“Confidential Information“) may be revealed to me. Such Confidential Information shall include, without limitation, information regarding the Program’s concept, format and/or ideas, the participant selection process, identities of participants, challenges and/or activities that may be included in the Program, locations of the Program, the content and final outcome of the Program or of any episode, and any other confidential and/or proprietary information relating to the Program and/or any of the Producer Parties. In consideration of the opportunity to participate in the Program, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, and as a material inducement to Producer to invite me to participate in the Program, I expressly agree that I shall not, directly or indirectly, verbally or otherwise, at any time (whether or not I ultimately appear in the Program), publish, reveal, disseminate, disclose, or cause to be published, revealed, disseminated or disclosed (herein “Disclosure“) any Confidential Information to any person, firm or entity whatsoever (herein “Third Parties“) nor shall I issue any press release or public statement relating to the Program, Producer, my Appearance or this Agreement without Producer’s prior written consent.

If any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this agreement, or the breach of any term hereof, cannot be settled through direct discussions, the parties agree to endeavor to first settle the controversy or claim by mediation conducted in Angeles County, State of California, and administered by JAMS under its applicable rules. If a dispute is not otherwise resolved through direct discussions or mediation, the controversy or claim, including the scope or applicability of this agreement to arbitrate, shall be resolved by binding confidential arbitration conducted in Los Angeles County, State of California, and administered by JAMS in accordance with the Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures of JAMS or subsequent versions thereof, including the optional appeal procedure and including, without limitation, the rule providing that each party shall pay pro rata its share of JAMS fees and expenses, and the rules providing for limited discovery and other exchange of information. The JAMS Rules for selection of an arbitrator shall be followed, except that the arbitrator shall be an experienced entertainment law arbitrator licensed to practice law in California or a retired judge. I agree that any dispute resolution proceedings will be conducted only on an individual basis and not in a class, consolidated or representative action. Notwithstanding the above requirements, if a party files suit in court or files an arbitration before first seeking to mediate, in direct violation of this paragraph, the other party does not have to request mediation to enforce the right to compel arbitration as required under this paragraph. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing in this Agreement or in any of the applicable rules of JAMS shall prevent Producer from seeking provisional relief outside of arbitration (without posting any bond) for any breach or threatened breach by me of this agreement, including, without limitation, equitable and/or injunctive relief. 

This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California, regardless of the place of its physical execution and shall be binding on me and my successors, parents, licensees, legal representatives, heirs, and assigns (as applicable). I shall not raise, and hereby waive, any defenses based upon improper venue, inconvenience of the forum, lack of personal jurisdiction, or the sufficiency of service of process.

Initial ________ 

AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED

–=–

Talk about the devils contract!

To be clear, I refused this in triplicate, sending a return email with all of my objections for the record, which if you know me and my work, should be obvious. Amazingly, I did so because the employee that received my absolute denial and condemnation of this contract sent me the following reply:

Viviana Galvis <viviana@texascrew.com>
Fri 4/5/2019 11:38 AM
  • Clint;
  • Allison Jones <allison@texascrew.com>

Dear Clint,

I’ve been discussing with the producers about this matter and we are willing to hear your thoughts or concerns in the release and work around a template (contract) that will be suitable for both parts.
We are not a Hollywood production, our production company is providing content for the Travel Channel, however, as the Travel Channel has acquired Discovery, they usually require a license like this one, that allows the production to use your image without any problems, like stopping the production etc.
Your intellectual rights are still yours and those are not transferable, but as you will be sharing ideas, and ideas have no copyright, we want to make sure that you will be comfortable by sharing your ideas with us on camera.
Trust me, I’m Colombian and have worked in some productions with a lot of legalese back and forth and some of this results overwhelming for people that doesn’t understand about the requirements from some American networks. Fortunately, you know the language, you have experience in the tv industry and maybe with some corrections, we can all be happy.
Let me know your thoughts, we’d be happy to offer solutions,
Viviana Galvis

–=–

Needless to say, the response I sent back rebuking the evil shit-pile that was this contract was not approved by the shyster entertainment attorneys that work for that conglomerate media corporation. In fact, I’ve never even heard a response back to my returned discourse. I gave them 5 months. Nothing. Screw em’.

But the takeaway, that is, what I really want you to know here today is two-fold. Firstly, that I always have and promise I will continue to hold my own inherent rights, integrity, and moral rectitude and standards above any “consideration” of fame and fortune (or lack thereof) promised by these corporate devils (attorneys). And secondly, you need to know that those who do sell out to these devils simply cannot be trusted, because trust is not an option. Choice is not an option, once the choice is made to give up choice. Their agreement to such terms is proof positive of a lack of integrity, and whatever is leftover is killed by contractual obligation. Their appearances on these predictive programing reality and conspiracy television shows confirms their willingness to sell out, their inherent vice, for they would not be on television without such contractual waivers being agreed to and signed. I am living proof of that fact.

You may take this for what it’s worth, choosing to ignore it or to take it to heart. There are no exceptions. This includes all news anchors, all entertainers, all talkshow hosts, all guests, all mainstream, syndicated radio hosts, and anyone playing a character in that Hollywood witchcraft of false show. I have never been asked to sign a contract in all this time until now, until getting close to that evil that is the interconnected Hollywood mainstream. Stop placing your faith in that vile cesspool.

I can show you this contract for one and only one reason, and this fact proves that I didn’t sign it or agree in any way to it. I chose not to give up any so-called rights to speak of their evil intentions. How many do you really think can say that? Even section 501 corporate churches (religions) are refrained from speaking up in political matters, because of similar contractual considerations with government and an artificial “non-profit” status. I will not allow my hands or my God-given (inherent), Natural rights to be tied by the signature of any legal persona.

As for my presence out here, I can only watch from afar, in my apparently self-induced obscurity, looking on as my false heroes die one at a time, watching them fall like dead ducks as they cross over into the “entertainment only” abyss. But at least I can watch with my own integrity intact. And maybe that’s enough.

But I gotta tell you, it’s sure starting to feel like an empty, lonely place out here.

.

–Clint richard-son (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Friday, August 30th, 2019

How To Use Religious Exemption Against Vaccination


I recently received yet another emailed inquiry regarding the three possible “exemptions” for vaccines. Probably more than any other subject this particular question rears its ugly head, and usually they reference religious exemption more than not. Now, I keep telling people not to ask me questions or listen to me if you don’t want the total, harsh reality that is the Truth, but they seem to want to be disappointed and disillusioned anyway. And so today I’m going to tell you that desire the Truth exactly how you can use religion as your sword against vaccination for you and your children.

First, though, let’s treat the other exemptions, those being medical excuse and conscientious objection.

Beginning with medical exemption, this particular legal exemption is a catch 22. In order to exempt yourself from a medical act, such as vaccination, you need a medical doctor’s letter. See the problem here? While in reason and truth any free-willed, neutral, educated medical doctor (an oxymoron) would exempt all his or her patients from the horrors of vaccination, the term “medical doctor” (MD) is not a real thing. It’s a flattering, legal title granted only to those willing to not act upon their conscience, and therefore possess and active ignorance and willingness to ignore actual science that shows the absolute ludicracy that is vaccination and the health epidemic it has caused. All that aside, the most important factor to understand for why this exemption is useless and revokable is because it is not an inherent right of any man. It is specifically a legal, man-made exemption that has nothing to do with God-given (Natural), inherent rights. All medical exemptions are powered by government permission to do so only, and the corporations that most doctors work for are known to fire without prejudice any nurse or doctor that either refuses vaccines for themselves or speaks publicly about the dangers of vaccines. In the near future, you will not find any doctor that will be willing to risk his or her career or funding just so you can protect yourself and your children from such dastardly pharmaceutical poisons. Because everyone in the world is technically qualified for a medical exemption when the actual research and studies are understood, it’s kind of like giving everyone in the world $1 million dollars: nothing would actually change, and in a few years most common people will have lost it anyway to the various schemes designed to legally steal it, such as medical billing, the #1 reason for bankruptcy in the United States. If everyone is exempt, then no-one is. This will make more sense as we continue…

The second exemption is conscientious objection. This one is about as realistic as it was in the draft for the Vietnam War. If a right is revokable, then again it’s not a Natural, inherent Right. If a right can be taken away, then it was never yours in the first place. And unfortunately, this applies to all three exemptions we are covering here. But more to the point, there is no real place for conscious objection in a legal system. The legal, civil law is strict. It is not up for contention. Follow it or be punished. Choice is an illusion when under the Roman (strict) matrix of legal law. Moral and conscientious thoughts are certainly allowed, but acting on them is a thought crime. It’s terrorism at best. If this wasn’t true, then government would fall tomorrow due to conscientious objections to its immoral policy of controlled chaos and madness. So the conscientious objection fallacy, while hopeful in its promise, is really just a cosmic joke. Just ask those who objected to the Vietnam War. You might need to go to Canada for that though… or visit them in prison.

To put this another way, we must understand that corporations, that is, legal persons, including individual citizenships of the United States, were invented in Roman times to be strictly exempt from moral and conscious responsibilities and actions. Corporations (persons) are designed by men to remove men from God’s Realm, from Nature, and therefore to pretend a legal (artificial) shelter from the moral Law, and equally from spiritual consciousness. The point is this: conscientious thought requires a spiritually and morally conscious man that acts by choice. This is impossible under and in the matrix of legal code. For there is no conscious in legal persons, places, or things. There is nothing. Emptiness. A void of anything Real, of anything Natural, of anything Created by God. Without choice, there can be no moral action. The legal law eliminates choice, leaving no ability to follow any alternative, moral path, and generally causes men to act against their religious, moral foundation. This is indeed the specific purpose of the legal system and the person-hood, the elimination of the need of men to choose at all times what Nature and Its Law requires. The legal law unbalances the scale, taking away the ability to spiritually measure right and wrong. A person that has no conscious cannot claim conscientious objection, for a legal person is property of the legal system, and like a video game character, is only allowed to exist by the rules of the legal game system and its masters (false gods). A pawn is ultimately moved by its master, headlong into oblivion, having no real choice except to go forward on the legal game board. No is not an option, and pawns have no exemptions or free will from their controllers. Real choice is simply not in the artificial code that makes up a legal person. A person is a construct of legal law. It has no conscious of its own. And the man that acts in legal person therefore surrenders any right to act on his or her own conscious, instead obeying strictly and under sanction the legal law of men without question, that is, without the right to act conscientiously.

And that leads us to the third legal exemption, that being a “religious” one. In this particular exemption we find a hint of the only True choice respected by government, the religious law. Sure, a medical exemption is respected, but doctors are agents of government, so once government removes the artificial, temporary right of doctors to exempt a patient and keep their jobs, then that exemption will be gone as well, as moral choice by the man acting as a “doctor” of government will no longer be an option. The difference between the medical and conscientious objection vs. the religious exemption is very simply that the legal law is in every case trumped by actual religious law.

The religious exemption, therefore, would seem to be the all powerful weapon to end all battles, right?

Wrong. And here’s why…

If you’ve ever seen a movie where the hero attempts to ward off evil spirits with a cross or crucifix, say in vampire movies or the fantastical films about Catholic priests committing exorcisms, you always find a recurring theme. They all say and warn the same thing: you have to have faith for that to work. In other words, to hold up an idol of anything and pretend that you have the power that that idol represents is what is called hypocrisy. If you want to harm a vampire or demon with a cross, then it is the power of God that does it, not some trinket made by the hands of men. But when actual religious faith comes into the soul bearing that idol, suddenly the power of God is behind it, and the mere idol turns into a weapon of unimaginable proportions.

This is, of course, merely the fiction of Hollywood. Or is it? Is there actually a moral lesson to learn from these fantasies? Can this concept be applied to the subject at hand, that is, vaccination exemption?

Absolutely. In fact, we can use it as a very understandable metaphor.

Let us pretend that the idol in these ridiculous Hollywood stories, the cross, is what we are holding up as our own figurative weapon of legal “religious exemption.” Can a self-proclaimed “atheist” possibly use religious exemption without believing in the very Source of that weapon? The answer in Reality, of course, is no. But the legal realm is not Reality, and so yes, strangely enough an atheist can use a legally invented idol called as religious exemption. In other words, the atheist can openly commit hypocrisy against his own false belief system, and the legal system is happy to protect that right of hypocrisy… until, that is, the governmental body of that legal system is ready to retract it. And that’s where most of us find ourselves today, watching helplessly as the administrators of the persons (property) of the legal matrix change its programming code to legally reflect that religious exemption is no longer an idol that is acceptable to be used.

But how can it do that?

Simple. These legal exemptions never existed in Reality in the first place for any man. Legalism is fiction. Legal law is fiction. And so any exemption that comes from a legal government (artificial person) was born and will die in fiction. And any religious claim you may make as a legal, artificial, fictional person dies with it.

You see, the whole time you’ve been that hero (actor) trying to use an idol that has nothing to do with what that symbol’s actual Source is. To use a True religious right, a man (male or female) must act as a religions man. Persons (legal fictions) cannot be religious nor act under the Higher religious law, because persons aren’t of Nature. They aren’t Real. They are not Creations of God. Thus, the vampiric demons of government, that is, attorneys in black moo-moos acting as false gods (magistrates/judges) have no revulsion to your false idol of religious exemption. You’ve gotta have faith for that to work…

Please watch these for your understanding, they are placed here by me for a purpose.

–=–

Idolatry: the TV actor, Vincent, before True faith:

And the God-fearing man Vincent after True faith:

–=–

The cross only represents the Law of God (Jesus Christ/Logos), but without faith, the Law of God is a useless idol in any form. Without following the Law, It has no power to protect you, and as a weapon it’s pointless. It’s just an idol for sinners pretending to worship God through Jesus Christ (Law). Might as well hold up a kitten without claws.

Keep in mind this is metaphoric, and that its meaning applies to defeating all things that are “evil” in the Bible, which essentially is anything man-made, including the legal matrix code. The vampire (attorney) must corrupt your blood in order to control you. The fangs of the vampire are the words of a legal contract. And personhood is to be bound under the spell (spelling of words) of the master of that contract, causing the agentic relationship of master and servant (volunteerism). The Law of God (Nature), represented by the symbol of the cross here, is that which defeats the vampire (attorney). The word of Truth (God) destroys the words of legal demons. The cross represents the implementation of moral choice. The vampires of government have no control over you unless you accept their initial, original sin, the corruption of blood (attainder) that places artificial status upon you in their own, invented society.

And this depiction of false faith in a false idol of god describes just about every “Christian” in the United States, and for that matter, the world. Legal religions (corporations) are institutionalized idolatry, causing men to attempt in vein to worship God while doing so in legal, fictional persona (mask), to bear the protection of God and Its Law while not following that law themselves, as if It is external from them. And this is why the Christian “church” has no power religiously or politically. A section 501 corporation is designed to take away religious rights and exemptions, not bestow them. Only a fool can possibly believe that God-given rights can be given by a legal corporation under the IRS code of government. Only a brainwashed man can be made to believe a corporation (artificial person) has anything to do with the Source of Nature and Its Law. Only a idolator can call himself a “Christian” while following the legal, antichrist, anti-God law of man. Only a slave cannot differentiate between the God of Nature and the false gods of legal government. For the actual, True church of the Bible is only a free and moral, private People, that is, men following the Law of God (Nature), which absolutely excludes and despises all legal code. But in legalism, the “church” is a legal term of art meaning a corporation, an artificial person in law, and has nothing to do with men. In other words, legally established religions are not in any way part of God’s Realm or Law. They are a legal simulation of the Real, and so are its members. Corporate religions bound completely under legal government is like a bug trap for men, burning our wings so that we cannot fly away, keeping us locked into the legal (anti-God) system of law even while allowing us to pretend in idolatry through flattering title (without True faith) that we are followers of the Law of the Bible, of the example of Jesus Christ. Worst of all, this is all warned about in the Bible, which calls us foolish hypocrites as the figurative dumb asses.

But here’s the kicker. Men are hypocrites toward the Law of God (Nature) in the Real world. But in the legal matrix, persons are simulators. Simulation and hypocrisy are the same term. Therefore, to act in legal persona (mask) under legal (anti-God) law in the legal simulation while at the same time pretending to be a True “Christian” equals the metaphor of being plugged into the matrix (lie) with or without contemplation of ones actual hypocrisy as a man. The “Christian” flattering title is merely ones “projected self-image” while trapped inside the legal matrix code. It’s idolatry. Simulation. But in Nature, from God’s perspective, if you will, simulation equals hypocrisy, two different words that mean the same thing in the two different realms.

It’s also called apostasy, and it’s the foundational purpose of corporate Christianity. It’s the opposite of being an apostle:

APOSTASY – In English law. The total renunciation of Christianity, by embracing either a false religion or no religion at all. This offense can only take place in such as have once professed the Christian religion. (–Black’s Law 2nd Edition)

APOSTASY – noun – [Gr. a defection, to depart.1. An abandonment of what one has professed; a total desertion, or departure from one’s faith or religion. 2. The desertion from a party to which one has adhered… (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

APOSTATE – adjective – False; traitorous. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

HYPOCRITE – noun – 1. One who feigns to be what he is not; one who has the form of godliness without the power, or who assumes an appearance of piety and virtue, when he is destitute of true religion. And the hypocrite’s hope shall perish. Job 8:12. A dissembler; one who assumes a false appearance. Fair hypocrite you seek to cheat in vain. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

–=–

I go to church every Sunday (according to the legal Roman calendar, the Pope, and its legal system of secular law) and on legal holidays (which are not actually Holy Days) and therefore I’m a “Christian.” Time to call bullshit on that logical fallacy, isn’t it? It’s more like this: I don’t follow the Law of God by the example of the Christ allegory and instead have idolized the corporate churches false image of Jesus Christ as if Christ is God, and so I call myself as the Romans did, as a “Christian,” despite my membership to an apostate, corporate religion that makes its own doctrine and misleads me at every turn in simulation.

So how can you use religious exemption in the legal system? You can’t, dumb ass.

You’ve got to have faith for that to work. 

But the legal system and its public institutions have caused you to not even know what faith is! And so here is where I will tell you how to religiously bypass any legal law that requires persons to vaccinate.

Ready?

Stop acting in legal person (artificial, legal status).

Stop taking benefits from the demons and vampires of legal (anti-God) governments, which require you to voluntarily act in legal person.

Stop being an idolator.

Stop believing you have inherent, Natural, God-given rights when you sold them long ago to become a legal citizenship and as you continue to simulate the part.

Stop believing the foolish notion that God’s (religious) Law can save you when you don’t have True religion and faith as your sword (reason) and shield (protection).

Lastly, we must understand just what an exemption is and why it doesn’t and cannot exist for men of God.

EXEMPTION – 1. Freedom from any service, charge, burden, tax, evil, or requisition, to which others are subject; immunity; privilege. Many cities of Europe purchased or obtained exemptions from feudal servitude. No man can claim an exemption from pain, sorrow or death. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of Law)

EXEMPTION – Freedom from a general duty or service; immunity from a general burden, tax, or charge. A privilege allowed by law to a judgment debtor, by which he may hold property to a certain amount, or certain classes of property, free from all liability to levy and sale on execution or attachment. (–Black’s Law 2nd edition)

–=–

Why are these exacting definitions important to comprehend?

This is key. To have an exemption from vaccination means one and only one thing — vaccines are already a requirement. In other words, the government considers it your duty as its citizen (subject to its legal law) to be vaccinated. The exemption is a temporary, revokable “freedom” from that duty, a permission to avoid that requirement of law. Vaccines are already required of persons (property), which are performance debt-slaves of government. If you claim exemption, you are actually acknowledging and respecting the false legal law and its gods by getting their permission to have freedom from it. Remember, in legalese, freedom is defined as franchise. It’s not True freedom under God to self-govern, but rather an artificial freedom bestowed temporarily to the fictional person that you currently respect and utilize as a status in legal society. Remember, all man-made things are temporary. Therefore, if the person is required to be vaccinated, then you as surety in bond of that person must obey in order to retain that franchise (legal freedom), in order to continue using that person (legal status). Those who refuse the legal law and end up punished, fined, or imprisoned for their illegal behavior (while acting in legal persona) have broken the rules of their franchise (citizenship). People in jail also have freedom (franchise) when they are on good behavior. Same thing, different prison. In the open-air debtor’s prison of the nation, citizens (prisoners, as public, non self-governing wards of the state) are given certain exemptions in their franchise, meaning they have certain artificially induced freedoms allowed to them by permission, licensure, permit, etc. Only a fool would believe those rights and freedoms are God-given, Natural rights.

Inversely, we can understand our Duty to God (Nature), including ones requirement of following God’s Law of Nature by the example of Jesus Christ (Logos personified), which in itself requires no respect of lies, fictions, persons, status, titles, false gods (magistrates), or anything else artificially placed over Nature (Truth) in a simulation of the Real. Again, there is simply no exemption from God’s Law. With any God-given, inherent right comes an equal duty to all other men. Lies are not exempt from Truth, they are diametrically opposed to Truth. And so it’s important to understand that legalism, that is citizenship under the nation, is specifically designed to fictionally exempt man from his Duty to God, to Nature, and that includes ones Duty to all other men. As this is in Reality impossible, the legal system depends on its ability to cloud and obscure any relation we may have to Nature and Its Law, offering the protection of the legal law and the false sense of forgiveness offered by the false “Christian” corporate church that is also under legal law, not God’s. To defeat God (Nature), the state simply replaced God with a fictional, corporate entity (idol) of its own invention, and then called it legally as religion.

RELIGIOUS – When religious books or reading are spoken of, those which tend to promote the religion taught by the Christian dispensation must be considered as referred to, unless the meaning is so limited by associated words or circumstances as to show that the speaker or writer had reference to some other mode of worship. (–Black’s Law 2nd Edition)

–=–

In American law as a “Christian country” (referring to the free and private People of the States, not the United States legalist corporation as an open-air prison for publicly held-in-persona debt-slaves), the Bible is considered as the meaning of the term “religious” unless that word “religious” is intentionally twisted by the legal language to mean its opposite. Get it? In the United States district corporation, the word religious is a crime, but certain religious exemptions are allowed.

Allow me to quote my book, Strawman Volume 1, where True religion (action) of men and the legal franchise of limited, legal religious belief without practice (action) of US citizenships (persons) is differentiated:

–=–

Begin excerpt:

This is one of the most important lessons in this work. Please ensure full comprehension between these two very different “freedoms” before you proceed with this work. For as a citizenship of the United States, the attachment to your strawman as property under the law of persons only allows you to fall under the “freedom of religion” as a limited legal outlet of commercial franchise. In other words, “Religious Freedom” is against the law of the United States for its subjects (persons).

RELIGIOUS FREEDOMWithin constitution embraces not only the right to worship God according to the dictates of one’s conscience, but also the right to do, or forbear to do, any act, for conscience sake, the doing or forbearing of which is not inimical to the peace, good order, and morals of society. (Black4)

FREEDOM OF RELIGION – Embraces the concept of freedom to believe and freedom to act, the first of which (belief) is absolute, but the second of which (action) remains subject to regulation for protection of society. (Black4)

—=—

Now you tell me, what good is religious, moral belief if you are not allowed to act on it? To be clear, this state of confusion at bar is the very purpose of nations, to prevent self-governing, moral standing in men. For no moral man would allow a nation as this to continue in its abhorrent actions against God (Nature) and man. But the moral man is cowed and pacified by his surety to the law of his persona (false identity). We are so smitten and proud of our nationality, our personality in public that we don’t dare risk doing what is right in and under the Law of God. This is unmistakably and self-evidently the work of the devil (the attorney class) and his scribes.

These are completely separate definitions, on separate pages of the dictionary. They are not the same thing. As citizenships of the United States, you better damn well know the difference before proceeding herein, and before you try and act morally in a society that strictly forbids moral actions without license from the state.

Freedom of moral thought, but not freedom to act upon that conscious moral thought… This is what public, legal freedom (franchise) is when defined by the commercial gods — a legal corp-oration called government. It is not freedom of religion, but franchise of religion. These are as the rules set for employees (agents) by their employer (principal). This is not Natural freedom under God, which is described above as Religious Freedom. This is tyranny named (noun) as “freedom,” where the ability to practice religion is confounded and limited to the franchise it belongs to (of), as freedom (franchise) of (belonging to) religion (memberships to legal corporations, as the legal, anti-God definition of religion). In the United States, the lack of a moral standing in God’s Law (religious, spiritual Life) is the official state religion, as an enforced, amoral lack of It. Freedom is only a franchise allowed to fictional persons. Governments cannot control in totality your thought processes, only your actions (anti-pro-verb) while in its property. Specifically, we must recognize absolutely that the purpose of the legal law is to prevent man from acting upon his moral thoughts and beliefs. 

—=—

“No one is punished for his thoughts. 

—COGITATIONIS PAENAM NEMO PATITUR. Dig. 48, 19,18. (Black4)

—=—

It’s impossible to have religious freedom in any nation where churches are licensed to the government.

—Congressman George Hansen, quoted from “In Caesar’s Grip,” by Peter Kershaw

—=—

“The framers of our Constitution meant we were to have freedom of religion, not freedom from religion.

—Billy Graham

—=—

The legal realm acknowledges only written and spoken words. It is immune, so to speak, from religious and moral (unwritten) controls, as legalism and religious action are foreign to each other. Man is only punished for his actions, and when his actions are in the person of another, he is not acting according to his own moral thoughts of Law.

By providing the fictional, legally “natural” person (strawman) with an insurance bond for a man’s operation in that fictional, commercial realm, government ensures that each individual man will act collectively according to civil law and not according to his own religious and moral thoughts. This is the separation of mind from the body, the killing of the spirit (soul). For the law is attached to the person, and thus the man in the fictional chains of surety to that person is bound by the public law of persons. By acceptation of that person as a commercial vessel (a citizen-ship) in surety, man tacitly agrees and consents (through assent) to abide by the legal law in direct opposition to God’s Law while acting in that fictional persona. He literally agrees to use his Real body as insurance to ensure that he will operate in fiction (evil) according to strictly written law, and if he does not, the man in surety will be judged and punished for the incorrect use of that corporate strawman (property of government). Thus the man’s moral mind does not control his Self (his body), for the law of persons controls his mind and therefore his actions, where the legal persona acts as the surrogate or second self. This is a lack of True Self-respect.

—=—

“No man can enter into a strong man’s house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strong man (through legal personhood); and then he will spoil his house.”

“Or else how can one enter into a strong man’s house, and spoil his goods, except he first bind the strong man? (through legal personhood) and then he will spoil his house.”

—Matthew 12: 29, Mark 3: 27, KJB (added by author for this excerpt)

—=—

“My son, if thou be surety for thy friend, if thou hast stricken thy hand with a stranger, Thou art snared with the words of thy mouth, thou art taken with the words of thy mouth.

“Go to the ant, thou sluggard; consider her ways, and be wise: Which having no guide, overseer, or ruler, Provideth her meat in the summer, and gathereth her food in the harvest.”

—Proverbs 6: 1-2 and 6-8, KJB

—=—

This is the purpose and pretext of legal surety: insurance that the instigation of person-hood at birth into the nation will incite man’s actions to be in concordance with the legal law as opposed to being in respect of God’s Law and Nature. Incitement to evil acts without moral compass (direction). This is a binding relationship to fictional rulers under contractual terms (word magic), even by the shaking (striking) of hands. For a man’s feet never touch land while he sails his ship upon the virtual sea of that surety (security) of legal commercial fiction. The legal jurisdiction is an invisible, fictional barrier set upon Creation and its Law; a prophylactic barring man from his very own essence as part of that Oneness of Nature.

A fictional person simply cannot follow God’s Law, without exception, for a person is not a Creation of God. God bestows no status upon man but self-evidence. This untouchable essence of negativity towards any of man’s systems of positive law can never be taken away, though obviously we have been fooled into contractually selling those God-given attributes in exchange for fictional non-sense. A man acting in person is subject only to man’s utilitarian legal law of persons (status/condition), with strict prohibitions against God that we call as the doctrine of “freedom of religion.” Opposites attract. A man in public personhood does not need and is not expected to think in any way that is responsible or compos mentis, for the person is allowed only to follow man’s (its master’s) strict legal law when used by its autonomic user.

—=—

“This word ‘person’ and its scope and bearing in the law, involving, as it does, legal fictions and also apparently [IN APPEARANCE ONLY] natural beings, it is difficult to understand; but it is absolutely necessary to grasp, at whatever cost, a true and proper understanding to the word in all the phases of its proper use. A person is here not a physical or individual person, but the status or condition with which he is invested. Not an individual or physical person, but the status, condition or character borne (carried) by physical persons. 

The law of persons is the law of status or condition.

—American Law and Procedure, Vol. 13, page 137, 1910

—=—

End Excerpt.

–=–

The Law of God is just as strict as the legal law. It is impossible to Obey the Law of Nature while also obeying the legal law that is designed to be opposed to God’s Law in every way. Claiming anything from religious Law while in personhood under legal, civil law is at best foolishness and at worst insanity. And worshiping God while acting in legal persona is like holding up a cross in idolatry without faith. It will never actually happen.

Religious exemption is a lie, just like any other exemption. It only exists in the legal realm, nowhere else. And in Truth, if you qualify for any type of legal exemption, then you have already fallen into the legal trap. There is no exemption from Reality. There is no exemption from God’s Law. There is only choice, free will, and you must choose which Law to follow.

Exemption, to be clear, is a post-requisite. One can only be exempt from legal law because of whatever legal status one already obtained that allows for exemption. But in the end, a debt-slave is really exempt from nothing, for all legal exemptions can be revoked by the false god that bestowed that artificial, legal right in the first place. The exemption never existed in Reality, being a non-inherent, unnatural right to man, and so it has no religious Law protection. God protects no man that claims exemption from anything, because to claim exemption one must already claim to be agent for a legal entity. Only persons can claim exemption, not men.

A religious man in the True sense needs no exemption. He just says no. Exemption implies that some higher power exists and that the man is pretending to be under that power and authority instead of that of Nature’s Law. You don’t need exemption if you are not under the legal law of the false gods of government. It’s this Higher consciousness that is voided through legal, religious and conscientious exemption. That is, to claim legal exemption one must already be accustomed through brainwashing and public education to believe that government already has power over you as a man (Creation) of God, and in this case, that you are already required to be vaccinated  but currently, out of the good graces of the legal gods, have exemption from that legal duty to that government as a person (property) of it. A legal exemption is a claim against a legal thing. Filing a legal exemption is not protection against forced vaccination, it is a claim of artificial rights invented and bestowed upon a feudal tenant of government, which can be revoked or refused at any time for the protection, security, and continuity of government. You can exercise religious exemption while it is allowed my your master because it has nothing to do with True religion. But what you can’t do is practice religious faith to say no to vaccines by the power and authority of God (Nature).

The moral of this story is that unless you act morally, spiritually, and without legal persona, you have no actual inherent right of exemption, because there is no such thing in Nature (Reality). Exemption is a sign that one is in the lowest form of beggary, of slavery, of despotism, of employment (use as property), of dependence upon a legal, state-bestowed franchise of artificial freedom much like a rat in a cage. The power to say no comes not from legal words in the legal matrix code created by false gods. The power to say no comes only from following the Law of God (Truth), which absolutely forbids acting in and respecting other persons and flattering titles, especially the false gods of government. To be clear, if you are not a person, you cannot be forced to be vaccinated. But you cannot just merely claim not to be a person. It doesn’t work that way. Just ask any illegal alien. To act religiously is to obey God’s Law in its fullness. The state will not recognize a free man (son) of God unless that man is actually acting under and as a son of God, of the Law, without deviation, without depravation, without departing the faith (Law), and without defection.

Unfortunately, as the title of this writing appears to promise at first glance, there is no actual (True) religious exemption from vaccination. It’s a misnomer (misnamed). It’s like a magic spell (spelling), where the word and the reality do not jive, just as the entire legal language dresses up Truth with fiction and misdirection. The God-honest Truth is that if you want your children to remain free from these nurse and doctor-delivered vials of poison that induce fast and slow-growing autoimmune disease, you must leave Babylon and take your children with you. And that requires absolute Love and total sacrifice. The state has tricked you into claiming through birth registration the abandonment of your parental (Natural) rights, delivering (abandoning) your child into wardship and apprenticeship to the nation (as a goyim). We are all birthed through trickery into this legal matrix (artificial womb), like a roach motel, but never told how to escape, how to unplug from the addiction of legalism. The state calls every child (and adult) as property through legal person-hood. In order for that to happen, it must trick you into that abandonment. It must cause you to be confused as to what it is for a child to be an actual property of the parent. No, a child is never a piece of property, as the legal realm attempts to establish through attachment of persona (legal identity/status). Belief that the person is the man (i.e. a child) is key, for identity means sameness in law. In other words, we are all tricked into believing that the person is the same as the man, a logical fallacy of monumental, Biblical proportions.

In Nature (God’s Realm), the word property is not connotative of possession as it is in legalese, but rather refers to Source. Origin. Truth. Natural connection. Family. Like hydrogen is a property of water and water is a property of Earth and Earth a property of the Universe (God), your child is a property (part) of your own Existence, and therefore a property of God’s Creation (the Universe), being a carrier of your blood (figurative, spiritual immortality, bloodline). The child’s blood is a property (ingredient) reflective of its parents (procreation). Not legal property, which is always a lie, but actual property which is a self-evident Truth. We were all tricked into selling those God-given, Natural rights of paternity, fooled into believing that the source of our God-given Natural rights are our own, not a property of God.

Self-ownership without God (Source) is the grand, communist delusion of the ages, where men believe that all inherent rights extend from man, not God, and therefore the Law of God can be bypassed by the selling of those rights in exchange for legal ones, entering the fictional construct of the legal matrix by pretending to abandon Nature (God) and Its Law. Yet in Nature (under God) we can never actually be spiritually defeated unless we choose (volunteer) to, for we never actually leave God, a self-evident Truth which the Bible states that God (Nature and Its Highest Law) never leaves our side if we choose and act in It. In Truth, we cannot Exist or Live without Source, without being a property of God (Nature) and Its Law. But we pretend that the self-evident Truth of Existence (God) doesn’t exist, that God doesn’t exist, and therefore that the power and authority (Law) of God (Nature) doesn’t exist. The status (persona) of legalism merely clouds the Truth with a lie, but the Truth cannot ever die, for no legal fiction exists without claiming some Truth as its victim and host. The duty of parenthood is part of the Law of Nature, not a right. A DUTY TO GOD, not to the state. But the state tricks us into abandoning our God-given Duty by relabeling and calling it a “legal right” that can be imaginarily transferred as a legal property, a fictional title. And we believe this lie so fervently that we are willing to allow the agents of the legalized state (corporation) to literally steal our True property (child) from our homes, without a fight, based on its assumed, mistaken legal identity — by a name that is not God-given.

But hey, who wants to give up that free public babysitting called education. After all, your lifestyle of free leisure time and employment are way more important than that of your health and that of your child, right? And everybody knows that the pursuit of happiness requires the pursuit of money, the root of all evil, right? Of course, your love of money is way more powerful and important than the health of yourself or your child, which is why the legal system runs on money, and why government is the printer, copywriter, lawmaker, enforcer, and banker of money, resting its whole international identity on the false valuation and respect of the evil that money represents. And that’s why, when government soon fulfills the already written requirement that all legal persons (citizenships) of the United States and other nations of goyim must be vaccinated, you will voluntarily and without hope take that poison as a mark that you are a beast of that legal system, that your love of money is more powerful than the love of your child, than your love or purity, than your love of God, and that you are indeed a Godless human without the ability to self-govern and use the gift of Free Will that God gave you. And your children’s children will follow in your weak and defeated example, that is, if the vaccines you allowed them to be tainted with don’t sterilize or destroy them as they’re designed to do.

But by all means, continue in this lunacy of trying to protect the legally bestowed religious exemption of fictional persons as if its already your own inherent right and not just an inconvenient leftover of the legalist thought of some damned outdated, idealistic moral inclusion by some past, slave-holding, false god.

No really, do as though wilt. That’s what they want, as long as it’s legal, and as long as you never actually act out based on any religious, moral thought. Think about it all you want, just don’t act on it without permission, licensing, and an approved, raised corporate seal under tax section 501.

If you want religious exemption, start acting religiously, and stop acting legally. Because using a legal persona is like wearing a condom… the legal persona is a prophylactic to Truth (God). You’ve no access to the Law of Nature, of Truth, from the fictional disposition of a legal (anti-God) persona. And that includes the actual moral choice you seek through legal “religious” exemption.

Heck, that’s such a simple concept that your kids will probably get it faster than you can. And you know what? If you are using your kids as an excuse, don’t. They can adjust way easier than you can to giving up the legal fiction. They’ll be much happier in Nature. They won’t be spoiled anymore. And they won’t suffer from the public school, Common Core blues.

It’s all on you, not them. You are their parent and protector. Start acting like it. It’s your God-given duty, and choice regarding such a Duty to God and to your child is a legally induced illusion for parents. You cannot shirk your responsibility and then pretend to have the very parental power you abandoned through legal birth certification and registration. You made a grevious error based on generational ignorance. Fix it or accept your own chosen, voluntary fate. Find God or remain in abandonment to your Source. Be a Natural and self-Existent property of God or remain a legal property of the state. And to fix the status of your child (property), which can only be a reflection of your own status, then you must first fix your own. You must be the one to sacrifice your false, secular lifestyle and perceived monetary wealth (mammon) therein, as the Bible tells you, crucifying it (the legal, fictional person) so as to be free and self-governing under the Highest Law. For a slave can never elevate its own issue (offspring) higher in law than his or her own legal status. A debt-slave can only bear another debt-slave, for status of an issue (property) depends upon the status of source. You cannot make gold from iron.

Or keep on pretending this knowledge doesn’t exist as you have your whole life. After all, a lifestyle of blatant hypocrisy in the legal matrix ain’t so bad… But I guarantee that it will require vaccination at some point.

The truth is, when you actually become a religious man, in your actions, in your mind body and soul, you won’t need any exemption. You won’t need to dodge bullets because they don’t exist except in the legal fiction matrix, and they can only harm the legal person of those men acting in agency and therefore in bond and surety to those legal persons, not men (sons) of God. The law of the legal matrix simply wouldn’t apply to you, because it’s finally beneath you and you refuse to plug in to any of its properties. You would, by your True religion, refuse to act in, believe in, or respect the persons, places, and things of the legal, commercial realm of mammon. You would see all things only as they really Exist, without artifice, without fiction, including those colored pieces of paper and their digital representations pretending to be money and credit/debt.

So please don’t send me any more inquiries about how to use legal exemptions against anything, unless you are first willing to fact the harsh Truth about your legally induced status (person-hood). I cannot help anyone that will not help themself. You seek legal power yet have none. It’s not Real, and neither, apparently, are you. Ironically, the power you seek Exists only in the Real, in that Realm of Nature and Its Law which you have voluntarily abandoned and continue to deny, that you continue to pretend to worship while wearing a spiritual condom (legal person), a fruitless effort that the Bible over and over tells you to avoid.

I’m sure your next question is how? How do I follow this seemingly impossible path back into Truth? Well, the answer is in the question. To Exist in Truth is to deny all lies, all fiction, all legalism, and all feigned power and delusion. The answers are laid out perfectly in the Bible, which provides metaphorical story after story to answer your questions. It’s why I wrote my book. I am not your judge, nor am I your guide or savior. You are. God (Nature/Truth) and Its Law is your destination, not some idol to worship falsely. But ignorance certainly guides no man of God, only lighting the path for the errands of fools.

Now you know.

Sorry to burst your bubble.

Not really.

.

–Clint richard-son (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Red Pill Sunday, August 25th, 2019