Vatican: The New Global Authority Of Mammon


—=—

“Am I therefore become your enemy,
because I tell you the truth?”

—Galatians 4:16, KJB

—=—

“No one loves the messenger who brings bad news.” 

―Sophocles, Antigone

—=—

Just what is the Vatican to you?

A city? A corporation? A church? The adversary?

Whatever one’s opinion of this monstrous empire of all empires may be, one thing cannot be denied. It’s value in monetary consideration is virtually priceless, from its private vault collections to its billion plus tithing members pretending that money is a tribute of forgiveness for sin. But what can we possibly call this beast system that has no purchasable (conquerable) price upon its hydra-like head, a net worth without a net, and globally a partner with most (soon to be all) nations and religions?

What else can we call this universal incorporation but mammon incarnate?

Is this merely a passing metaphor, or can we begin to see evidence of such a adversarial nature?

Today I wish to share a few financial characteristics with my readers that, without a doubt in my own mind, shows that this Catholic (universal) church is nothing more than the protector of the faith, that faith being in the god of mammon. And just as the various denominations of global religions have apparently latched on to that papal teat, so too it appears has all denominations of currency have fallen under that global protectionism of the Holy See.

Perhaps unofficially it is and has always been this way?

Firstly, let us start with the source.

The Latin, Roman phrase Motu Propria carries the meaning of “on his own impulse,” and sometimes “of his own accord.” As a papally issued “law” it is a document issued by the Pope (or other sovereign “god”) which is considered to be only given on the personal initiative of that office of vicar, the acting christ-head of that corporation sole, which is the eternal (immortal) corporation passed on to each new man when appointed (anointed) to that office. This is not at all uncommon, as the Mormon “prophet” is also a corporation sole as “president” of that “corporation of the president.” The queen of England, bishops of several denominations, and other officers of government are also in the form of such immortal offices known as corporations sole. To be more accurate, any corporation is legally always an artificial person, and it must be said that the Bible is of course strictly against all forms of personhood and false, faltering titles. This is covered in triplicate in my upcoming volumes entitled Strawman: The Real Story Of Your Artificial Person. Please save this image and follow the link to the website where my book(s) will be downloadable for free soon.

Link–> https://psuploads.s3.amazonaws.com/customer/phoenix_job_complete/447947f0-de2c-11e4-9899-0242ac110002/1428524277/447947f0-de2c-11e4-9899-0242ac110002-1.jpg

The Pope’s issue of a motu proprio has a LEGAL effect. But worst of all, due to the pretended infallibility of the office, any lie, falsehood, or fraud may be a protected and legally upheld reason and justification without invalidation for such an infallible papal law. To be valid, it just needs the Pope’s will or initiative, while the purpose and effect are secondary to that impulse. It’s an unholy power of an idolotrous god.

This popular form of Papal rescript was first issued by Pope Innocent VIII in the year 1484. The first motto proprio created by Pope Innocent VIII in 1484, and is often used as an establishment or amendment of law. In considering this ridiculous notion of infallibility and according to the Catholic Encyclopedia, the canonists in their tradition referred to these motu proprio as “mother of repose,” for no corruption, fraud, or untruth is allowed to be sighted therein, the validity solely based on the word of the corporation sole (artificial person) that is the pope. It is he who makes “truth.” It is he who turns the darkness into a false light.

Link–> http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/10602a.htm

—=—
Though less formal than a constitution and absent the papal seal, the authority of this Motu Propria privilege may used to establish anything from instructional mandates, administrative statute, the creation of any commission (i.e. benefice), or to confer special favor, according to Encyclopedia Britannica.

Link–> http://www.britannica.com/topic/motu-proprio

—=—

Examples of past willful initiatives, as documented and linked from wikipedia, include:

—=—

One such recent document that was issued Motu Propria was this one, which is the main subject of this post:

—=—

APOSTOLIC LETTER
ISSUED MOTU PROPRIO 

OF THE SUPREME PONTIFF
FRANCIS

APPROVING THE NEW
STATUTES OF THE FINANCIAL INTELLIGENCE AUTHORITY

By means of the Motu Proprio “The Apostolic See” of 30 December 2010 on the prevention and countering of illegal activities in the area of monetary and financial dealings, my predecessor Benedict XVI established the Financial Intelligence Authority (FIAand approved its first statutes.

Subsequently, with a view to strengthening further the measures already taken to prevent and counter potential illicit activities in the monetary and financial sectors, as well as countering the financing of terrorism and the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, by means of the Motu Proprio “The promotion” of 8 August 2013I accorded new functions to the Financial Intelligence Authority.

Bearing in mind also the advice of the Commission for Reference on the Institute for the Works of Religionwhich I established by means of the Chirograph dated 24 June 2013I have deemed it appropriate to reform the internal structure of the Authority so that it may fulfill even more adequately its institutional functions and therefore, with this Apostolic LetterI approve the Statutes of the Financial Intelligence Authority hereby attached, which replace the previous ones.

I dispose that everything established in this Apostolic Letter issued Motu Proprio has full and permanent valuenotwithstanding anything to the contrary, although it may merit special mention, and I decree that it be promulgated by its publication in L’Osservatore Romano, entering into force on 21 November 2013.

Given in Rome, at Saint Peter’s, on 15 November of the year 2013, the first of the Pontificate.

Franciscus PP.

 ______________________

Statutes
of the Financial Intelligence Authority

 Chapter I

Nature and Functions

Article 1  Nature and legal seat

1. The Financial Intelligence Authority (FIA) is an institution connected to the Holy See in accordance with Articles 186 ff. of the Apostolic Constitution Pastor bonus.

2. The Authority is endowed with canonical PUBLIC LEGAL PERSONALITY and has its legal seat in the Vatican City State.

Article 2  Functions

The Authority shall perform, in full autonomy and independence, the following functions:

a) prudential supervision and regulation of those entities that carry out professionally a financial activity;

b) supervision and regulation for the prevention and countering of money laundering and financing of terrorism;

c) financial intelligence

Link–> http://w2.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/motu_proprio/documents/papa-francesco-motu-proprio_20131115_statuto-aif.html

—=—

Now, the typical faithful defender of this massive conglomerate “church” corporation will of course focus only on the apologetic notion that this legal intelligence agency is there to protect us and the legal “church-state” from those idiotic keywords of “money laundering” and “terrorism.” And indeed, these two terms are repeated over and over by this apologist pope in his forced declaration motu proprio. The god has spoken. It’s corporate will be done. But we forget that to protect money is to respect money, thus to protect mammon is to respect mammon. Notice that this will of the pope is not one that protects say children, but banks. It does not protect man or any aspect of God’s Nature, only the institutions of mammon.

Sometimes I feel like I’m the only one out here that can or is willing to cut through the Bull-shit of these false prophets and self-proclaimed vicars (replacements) of christ, revealing only that oh so hurtful Truth that offends so many worshipers of the lie. As I have revealed in my research, this term “legal” is another term for that which is antichrist, anti-God, or anti-Nature (Creation). These opposing forms of law that we still utilize today, the strict legal or civil law and the “unwritten” moral or spiritual Law of course have their origins in Rome. The Vatican even labels its own moral authority of its elected officer the pope as a “spiritual jurisdiction.”

But let us make no mistake, the Vatican bank and Bank of Rome are alive and well. They practice usury on a grand scale. And do not mistake the Bank of England for anything but the Bank of Rome! This chain of mammon was opened in Venice in 1587, the Wisselbank in Amsterdam in 1609, in Hamburg in 1619, Nuremberg in 1621, Rotterdam in 1635 and last but not least the Bank of England in 1694, being the first bank to actually be named after the country it is housed in. After the “Bank” of Rome it was officially to become the world’s first Central Bank.

In other words, these Romish banks were the ultimate weapon of usury in mammon around the world, destroying the welfare and prosperity of all nations it touched. But then something strange happened during the reign of King Edward VI (1547-1553).

“(Act relating to Usury.) Another bill was brought in against usury, which passed both houses, and was made a statute. By it, an act passed in the 37th of the late king (Henry VIII), that none might take above 20 per cent on money lent, was repealed; which they said was not intended for the allowing of Usury, but for preventing farther inconveniences. And since Usury was by the word of God forbiddenand set out in diverse places of Scripture as a most odious and detestable vicewhich yet many continue to practice, for the filthy gain they make by it; therefore, from the 1st of May, all usury or gain from money lent was to ceaseand whosoever continued to practise to the contrarywas to forfeit both principal and interestto suffer imprisonmentand to be fined at the king’s pleasure.”

–Cobbett’s Parliamentary History of England, vol. I, p.596

—=—

Needless to say, his was a short reign, and his edict of anti-usury was of course repealed shortly thereafter in 1571.

Imagine a world without usury for a moment, without the need for new money. There would be no need for a central bank at all! Banking would become an unprofitable business, and bankers would be reduced to mere cashiers. And what possible power could the nations and the Vatican have without usury in mammon against the very scriptures it claims as its reason for being?

Eventually, with usury fully re-instituted by those Romish, Popish powers that be, the Bank of England was incorporated on July 27, 1694 as a private joint-stock association, founded by William Patterson (1658-1719). And the era of monopolistic corporate banking supported by the conspiring “church and state” and by making loans of money that could never apparently be repaid, including that whole starting capital of £1.2 million of the Bank of England being loaned to the English government, it was granted the exclusive right to issue notes and hold monopolistic oversight over the entirety of English corporate banking houses, with full support of the Parliament of course, which could end that central bank at any time but which also knows what happens to any entity or nation that defies the usurious Pope. Tied to that loaned principal was of course interest, compounded in a way that what lies in circulation is never enough to douse the flames of such usurious practices. More notes would always need to be issued as more and more compounded debt as usury was accumulated. And in this way, making all men and all nations as perpetual debtors, the debt itself became a performance debt, where the debt-slaves perform according to the will of their master lender. Of course the money is only a tool to cause performance, a win-win situation for the bankers, who would be paid in the money of its own creation or in the much more valuable collateral backing that loan. In order to preserve the collateral, the debtor must of course perform for the creditor.

England naturally expanded into the Americas via its corporations and through colonization, where the tables had turned, as the colonists this time attempted to oust the Romish central bankers of England in order to kill their outlaw usury.

The Parliament’s Stamp Act (called as the: Duties in American Colonies Act 1765under George III) was used as a tool by these central bankers to quash any attempts by those colonists to outlaw their usurious practices. It was a simple plan; bond with usury a burden upon the American colonists with a tax that could only be paid in English specie (minted coins), of which were solely a proprietary production of the Bank of England. To pay the tax, the colonies would need to borrow their coinage from the central bank of their tyrannical, usurious master. Of course, compounded usury was attached to that borrowed coin, and through that compounded interest the common class of colonists were thrust into the very similar economic conditions we suffer today at the hands of these same international collective of central banks, which are today all reforming under the purview and best practices and statute (cannon) laws of the United Nations and the World Bank. This devious lending practice has continued unabated as nations and countries borrow from America or other usurious institutions and are forced to pay those loans of interest back with collateral, with such things as water and mineral rights which are handed over to the exploitive corporations controlled by the same governing Roman Law as its regulatory hand.

—=—

“That is simple. In the Colonies, we issue our own paper money. It is called ‘Colonial Scrip.’ We issue it in proper proportion to make the goods and pass easily from the producers to the consumers. In this manner, creating ourselves our own paper money, we control its purchasing power and we have no interest to pay to no one.”

Benjamin Franklin on Colonial Scrip

—=—

“The Colonies would gladly have borne the little tax on tea and other matters had it not been the poverty caused by the bad influence of the English bankers on the Parliamentwhich has caused in the Colonies hatred of England and the Revolutionary War.”

Benjamin Franklin on Colonial Scrip

—=—

“9th. That the duties imposed by several late acts of Parliament, from the peculiar circumstances of these colonies, will be extremely burthensome and grievousandfrom the scarcity of specie (coins), the payment of them absolutely impracticable.”

The Declaration of Rights of the Stamp Act Congress

—=—

Franklin was also quoted in his opinion that the so-called revolution was caused by nothing more than the Bank of England and its usurious practices; practices of which are the common and standard business practices for the central bank of the United States and other nations today, only worse. For the Bank is the King and the King is the Bank. The revolution though can only be called as a deceit, creating only a newer, more organized, and more powerful monster than before, controlled by the same bloodlines that pretended to twice defeat it. War is of course the most single greatest and most profitable act of commerce imaginable, and also the greatest creator of debt, as nations clamor to acquire loans to fund their theaters of war. The central bank of the United States was created just two year after the signing of its constitution (corporate charter). For what is never discussed in the patriot mythology of today is the very definition of this word constitution. Let’s break it down into its component parts:

CONSTITUTION – contracts – The constitution of a contractis the making of the contract asthe written constitution of a debt. (–Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856, as commissioned and made law by congress, as “Adapted to the constitution and laws of the United States of America and of the several States of the American Union.”)

CON – …1. To know. 2. To make oneself master of; to fix in the mind or commit to memory… (–Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1828)

STICK – noun – [G. This word is connected with the verb to stick with stockstack, and other words having the like elements. The primary sense of the root is to thrust, to shoot, and to set.]… – verb transitive preterit tense and participle passive – stuck. [G., to sting or prick, to stick to adhere.] 1. To pierce; to stab; to cause to enteras a pointed instrument; hence, to kill by piercing; as, to stick a beast in slaughter. [A common use of the word.] 2. To thrust in; to fasten or cause to remain by piercing; as, to stick a pin on the sleeve… – verb intransitive – …2. To be unitedto be inseparable; to cling fast toas something reproachful… 4. To stopto be impeded by adhesion or obstruction; as, the carriage sticks in the mire. 5. To stop; to be arrested in a course…11. To adhere closely in friendship and affection. There is a friend that sticketh closer than a brother. Proverbs 18:24. To stick toto adhere closelyto be constantto be firm; to be persevering; as, to stick to a party or cause… To stick by, 1. To adhere closelyto be constantto be firm in supporting. We are your only friends; stick by us, and we will stick by you. 2. To be troublesome by adhering… (–Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1828)

TUTELAR, TUTELARY – adjective – [Latin tutelarissupra.] Having the guardianship or charge of protecting a person or a thingguardianprotecting; as tutelary genii; tutelary goddesses. (–Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1828)

TUTELAGE – noun – [from Latin tutelaprotection, from tueorto defend.] 1. Guardianshipprotectionapplied to the person protectingasthe king’s right of seignory and tutelage. 2. State of being under a guardian(–Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1828)

TUTOR – noun – [Latin from tueroto defend.] 1. In the civil lawa guardianone who has the charge of a child or pupil and his estate. 2. One who has the care of instructing another in various branches or in any branch of human learning… – verb transitive – To teachto instruct. 1. To treat with authority or severity. 2. To correct(–Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1828)

—=—

Whatever the reader may contemplate, in the legal realm Truth is much stranger than the fiction we are led to believe in by our chosen entertainment and the public tutelage by the legal public education system that is forced upon us by the state (nation) to create public-mindedness (idiocy).

Perhaps the most clever weapon created by these banks and their organizers and regulators (governments) was the creation of what we call modernly as the “personal loan.” Sold as commercial “product” made of thin air, this loan type is packaged in many ways and with many colors, from secured real estate loans to unsecured credit card debt charged with ridiculously high rates of usury. Whereas before the banks loaned only to governments, associations and corporations, and to men of high class and standing in their false nobility of blood, today any idiot can get a loan, and the most popular of these loans is the credit card.

But why was this such a brilliant move by the government’s banks in their pursuit of the usurious domination of all men?

To give every person a stake, a personal part of our own individual destruction in mammon, which is to say that every man has a choice to indenture himself to these moneychangers voluntarily and without force of government sanctions in taxation. These devils no longer need to steal our souls, for we contract and prostitute ourselves freely to that love of money in mammon via their constituted contracts. For it must be said that to love money is to believe in money and to believe in it is to respect its value. These terms are al equal in the legal setting, respect, belief, and love.

LIEVE – for liefis vulgar. [See Lief.] (–Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1828)

LIEF – adjective – [See Love.Dearbeloved. [Obsolete.] – adverb [supraThis word coincides with love, Latin lubetlibet, and the primary sense is to be freepromptready.] Gladlywillinglyfreely; used in familiar speech, in the phrase, I had as lief go as not. It has been supposed that had in this phrase is a corruption of would. At any rate it is anomalous. (–Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1828)

SUPRA – A Latin preposition, signifying above, over or beyond(–Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1828)

LOVE – verb transitive – luv. [Latin libeolubeo. See Lief. The sense is probably to be promptfree, willing, from leaningadvancing, or drawing forward.] 1. In a general sense to be pleased withto regard with affection, on account of some qualities which excite pleasing sensations or desire of gratification The christian loves (believes in) his Bible. In short, we love whatever gives us pleasure and delightwhether animal or intellectual; and if our hearts are rightwe love God above all things, as the sum of all excellence and all the attributes which can communicate happiness to intelligent beings… It is opposed to hatred. (–Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1828) (Emphasis mine)

Thus the Biblical meaning of the love of money being as the root of all evil is not a Natural Love, but actually the hatred of debt, the false belief (love) that such unfunded debt actually exists and is binding, and thus the respect for it and the authority of its artificial creators. It is this love (belief) of money that has destroyed each and every one of us, whether we care to admit it or not. The rich or wealthy man is too far gone to admit his lucre is tainted, valuing his wealth and money over knowledge, setting aside such knowledge as the true evil, for his wealth depends upon the harm of all others who have nothing. And it is our national citizenship, a performance debt place upon each rented persona (legal status), that requires such love and respect of mammon in the central bank of the nation. It causes us to compete with each other over the false dialectic (logic) that money is scarce, though unlimited amounts can easily be created with the press of a keyboard computer system entry.

My favorite verse in the Bible, one that Truly caused me to reconsider my own love (belief) in money, is this one:

—=—

“Let no man seek his own, but every man another’s wealth.”

–1 Corinthians 10:24, KJB

—=—

As I considered the consequences of such a suggestion, I realized this is the very opposite of this ancient system of Rome. We suffer at its hands and of its central banks and systems of internationally collaborative money and usury. This above all other verses changed my whole way of thinking. For it is the very revealing of a cure for all of this misery and suffering at the hands of tyrants and Pharisees in high places. This is the very definition of the Purest form of Charity, not some empty non-profit (non-prophet) donation to some false corporation calling itself by the empty name of a legal “501 charity,” but of a spiritual state of mind in all men that is the cure for all that causes dis-ease. It is the opposite of legalism, the opposite of mammon, the opposite of competition, and the opposite of modern corporate “religion.”

It is a vicious circle, for when both the government and the religions registered as “legal” corporations of and under government’s legal law are in league and support of mammon, of the justification of enslavement of all common men by usury, then no religion actually exists in Reality. Today’s churches are as fake and un-christ-like as any fiat currency out there. They support the legal fiction of the state and command against the scriptures to obey the “law of the land,” which in legal terms means only the “due process of law,” which in that fiction of law only means the “legal” opinion of the American and International Bar Associations (IBA).

As we will come to see, the Vatican is happily a partner with the IBA.

—=—

“The value of a thing is estimated according to its worth in money,
but the value of money is not estimated by reference to a thing.”

Res per pecuniam sestimatur, et non pecunia perrem. Maxim of Law.

—=—

“It’s impossible to have religious freedom in any nation where churches are licensed to the government.”

—Congressman George Hansen, quoted from “In Caesar’s Grip,” by Peter Kershaw

—=—

“Masonry, like all the Religionsall the Mysteries, Hermeticism, and Alchemy, conceals its secrets from all except the Adepts and Sagesor the Electand uses false explanations and misinterpretations of its symbols to mislead those who deserve only to be misledto conceal the Truthwhich it calls Lightfrom themand to draw them away from itTruth is not for those who are unworthy or unable to receive itor would pervert it. So God Himself incapacitates many men, by color-blindness, to distinguish colors, and leads the masses away from the highest Truth, giving them the power to attain only so much of it as it is profitable to them to know. Every age has had a religion suited to its capacity.

The Teacherseven of Christianityarein generalthe most ignorant of the true meaning of that which they teachThere is no book of which so little is known as the Bible. To most who read it, it is as incomprehensible as the Sohar.

So Masonry jealously conceals its secretsand intentionally leads conceited interpreters astray…”

—Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma, Pages 104-105

—=—

“The George Washington University was founded in 1821 as the Columbian College in the District of Columbia using funds set aside by George Washington to create “an institution in the nation’s capital dedicated to educating and preparing future leaders.” Today, there are over 20,000 students from every state and 130 countriesLocated just four blocks from the White House, it is fitting that the 2009 Princeton Review ranks GWU as second in the nation for “Most Politically Active Students…”

Aside from being named after America’s most famous Freemason, it’s notable that Freemasonry and the Scottish Rite have deep historical connections to the George Washington University. For example, Rice Hall which houses the University’s administrative offices, including the president’s office, is named for Luther Rice, a Mason and Baptist Minister who originally conceived the idea for the University. Three of the last five of the University’s presidents have been Masons, including President Emeritus and Colonial Lodge member Stephen Joel Trachtenberg, 33°, G.C. A gift of $1 million by the Scottish Rite in the 1928 created the University’s School of Governmentand there have been Masonic cornerstone laying ceremonies for at least five University buildings, including in 2003 for the Elliott School of International AffairsMasonry is also responsible for the Wolcott Foundationcreated by the High Twelve Internationalfor undergraduate and graduate scholarships to the University.”

—‘The University Lodge: A History and Case Study,’ excerpted from the Supreme Council of 33rd Degree Scottish Rite Masonry, Southern Jurisdiction, United States website, (scottishrite.org)

—=—

It’s always fun and horribly enlightening to put these pieces of the puzzle together. And it is not surprising that the secrets of the Bible are so well kept, even despite the fact that a Bible sits upon the shelves of every home and library and false church out there. For the best kept secrets are those hidden in plain sight. To hide the intent of any language, one only need create a language barrier. And so the Bible is hated and loved not because it is comprehended, but because it is compared to the church, though it is very much against such temples built by hands in masonry. We are taught that the church is a building instead of a spiritually driven, building-less People.

But what of this love (belief) of money? How does this love and respect of the nothingness that these gods (magistrates) of mammon represent as world fiat currencies destroy us all so easily? And what causes us to continue to respect and believe in (love) the fallacy that debt actually exists in Reality, as if it is an undeniable Creation of God?

The money has no value except that which we attach it to in our imaginations, in our love for it. The money is created by the govern-ment (mind control) of the idolatrous nations. All “Christian” religions are incorporated artificial persons licensed to practice legally (not spiritually) under (not over) the government, and so all “Christians” are encouraged to support, love (believe in), respect, and have faith in government, including its monopoly and “trust” on money creation. No one seems to ask what god is invoked when we pass these bills to and fro, as that incantation of “IN GOD WE TRUST” is never questioned. One thing is clear, this “god” certainly cannot be the God of Nature, the God of Reality, the God of “Creation.” Any fool can surely comprehend that much. But of course those in government and those who founded (constituted) it are, if not Masons, friendly to its universal (catholic) cause. And that cause is the protection of Rome, of the Caesar’s we call as those districted nations united under one governing religion of mammon.

CATHOLIC – adjective – 1. Universal or generalas the catholic church. Originally this epithet was given to the Christian church in general, but is now appropriated to the Romish churchand in strictness there is no catholic churchor universal Christian communion. The epithet is sometimes set in opposition to heretic, sectary or schismatic. 2. Liberal; not narrow minded, partial or bigoted; as a catholic man. 3. Liberalas catholic principles. Catholic epistles, the epistles of the apostles which are addressed to all the faithfuland not to a particular church– noun – A papist(–Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1828)

—=—

Of course the Catholic mind must be liberal. How else can one possibly accept the doctrines of the Catholic church and its corporate officer the Pope unless one ignores the scriptures? How else can “Christians” accept such blatantly false doctrines without having a liberal mind? And how else can all the nations of the world be formed unless the scriptures as the self0evident Law of Nature be purposefully ignored? This word liberal is yet another misunderstood term, and is a necessary state of mind for public-mindedness, so that multiculturalism and acceptance of all other forms of religious law, even that which is opposed to their very name-sake of christianity, are tolerated and integrated into society to the point that no religious way can possibly be found by the average plebe.

In the mythos of this nation as well, the “founding fathers” were certainly said to be known as “liberals,” and are most famous in their deism for ensuring the separation of the Highest moral Law of scripture from their own business ventures and slave-holding plantations in the enterprises of commerce and usury in mammon. For what man may hold slaves and charge usury if he follows the moral Law?

—=—

Of fifty-six signers of the Declaration of Independencefifty-three were Master Masons… George Washington the founder of this country was the first Grand Master of Masons of this commonwealth compromising the thirteen original States of this Land of Liberty founded on the principles of Brotherly LoveFaithHope and Charity, the vital breath of which is “Individual Liberty” and an equal opportunity to all of its citizens. Of the twenty-nine Major Generals in Washington’s army twenty four were Master Masons, of the thirty seven Brigadiers, thirty seven were Master Masonsproving that this “Land of Liberty” was founded by Master MasonsNow as thenmasonry’s challenge is the Holy Bibleits teachings from the center to circumference symbols of the everlasting. “The Washington Monument is built of stone contributed by all the nations of the earth to honor the founder of this republic. From Arlington it looks like a giant spike which God had driven, saying ‘Here I stake a claim for the home of Liberty’.”

Holy Bible Red Letter Edition – Masonic Edition Cyclopedic Indexed King James Bible, published by the John A. Hertzel Co. Chicago (1942).

—=—

The first central bank of the United States was of course chartered shortly after the Masonic constitution of the United States was, in 1791, for a central bank is after all a necessary plank of what is modernly called as the Communist Manifesto, of which all ten planks are now law in the United States. Though its charter expired after 20 years, and the bank abolished, it was re-chartered just 5 years later, in 1816. Again its 20 year charter was ended and not renewed in 1836. Not to be outdone, the Banksters of the Crown corporation reestablished the central bank as the “Federal Reserve” we know it today. But in taking a cue from previous failures, the charter of the Federal Reserves was recreated into infinity, creating the central bank that can never die unless congress wills it. As it stands, there is no contractual end of the charter for the federal reserve.

In answer to the many fallacious claims by so many alternative news outlets that simply do not fact-check what they parrot, the Federal Reserve found it necessary to create a section reserved just for the idiocracy that is the so-called “truth” movement, which in this author’s opinion is a controlled opposition designed to deceive the seekers of actual Truth, just as Masonry decrees in its doctrines. In short, those who take the name of “truth” and wear it as a false badge of courage but only seek its origin from second and third-hand sources as those in the “truth” movement do, as Albert Pike stated above, deserve neither Truth nor the Natural liberty under God’s Law it reveals.

On its website the Federal Reserve puts to rest any notion of its own legal mortality:, one of many patriot mythologies stemming from false “truthers” that it laughably corrects:

“Is the Federal Reserve Act going to expire?

No. The Federal Reserve Act of 1913which established the Federal Reserve as the central bank of the United Statesoriginally chartered the Federal Reserve Banks for 20 yearsBut in the McFadden Act of 1927the Congress rechartered the Federal Reserve Banks INTO PERPETUITY, and so there is currently noexpiration dateor repeal date for the Federal Reserve.

Link–> http://www.federalreserve.gov/faqs/is-the-federal-reserve-act-going-to-expire.htm

—=—

Such power does this “truth” movement have as its misinformation causes waves in that holy sea (See) of commerce that it causes such federal agencies to correct the idiocy promulgated by those false prophets. The agency is also forced to dispel all of the other “truths” told about its ownership, its supposed privacy, its apparent non-federal status, and its ability to make a profit.

“Who owns the Federal Reserve?

The Federal Reserve System fulfills its public mission as an independent entity within governmentIt is not “owned” by anyone and is not a privateprofit-making institution.

As the nation’s central bankthe Federal Reserve derives its authority FROM THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATESIt is considered an independent central bank because its monetary policy decisions do not have to be approved by the President or anyone else in the executive or legislative branches of governmentit does not receive funding appropriated by the Congress, and the terms of the members of the Board of Governors span multiple presidential and congressional terms.

Howeverthe Federal Reserve IS SUBJECT TO OVERSIGHT BY THE CONGRESS, which often reviews the Federal Reserve’s activities and can alter its responsibilities BY STATUTE. Therefore, the Federal Reserve can be more accurately described as “independent WITHIN the government” rather than “independent of government.”

The 12 regional Federal Reserve Banks, which were established by the Congress as the operating arms of the nation’s central banking systemare organized SIMILARLY to private corporations–possibly leading to some confusion about “ownership.” For example, the Reserve Banks issue shares of stock to member banks.

Howeverowning Reserve Bank stock is QUITE DIFFERENT from owning stock in a private companyThe Reserve Banks are not operated for profitand ownership of a certain amount of stock isby lawA CONDITION OF MEMBERSHIP in the SystemThe stock MAY NOT BE SOLD, TRADEDOR PLEDGED as security for a loandividends areby lawpaid to member banks at a maximum rate of 6 percentdetermined in part by each member bank’s total assets.

Link–> http://www.federalreserve.gov/faqs/about_14986.htm

—=—

Through painstaking research and airtime I have tried desperately to wake the mass of misled “truthers” up from their own delusions, from their own internal and external “infowar,” seemingly to no avail. The lies continue, parroted as “truths.” And this grandest of all patriot mythologies, in this author’s humble opinion, is one perpetrated by the very entities that wish to create a decoy. Obviously the Central Bank cannot exist without the full support and statute of congress and the belief (love) and respect of all involved. And we must remember that even hatred of anything is still a form of belief and respect of that thing’s existence. They say that hate and love are synonymous, and perhaps now we may understand why that is. And so the real enemy has floated complete bullshit to the main outlets of false “truth”, imagining a strawman enemy and argument of its own creation, so that the public will actually think that the Federal Reserve is not bound by the hand that created and regulates it, that being the congress of the United States. Thus this word independence is used without condition by “truthers” who know not the legal meaning of that word. And just like their own franchise of “freedom” that they believe is True and Natural liberty instead of a state of servitude and voluntary slavery to the nation they are the goyim (multitude) of, so too have we been made to believe that the Federal Reserve is somehow Naturally independent and somehow separate (meaning private) from government. And soundbites from official sources further fool us into such beliefs (love) of these false “truths.” Even as ridiculous as this concept is, that congress (the legal gods) created some entity that they then cannot control and have no power to abolish, the creation being somehow more powerful than its creator, and despite every actual official and legitimate published source available, the lie still persists despite the actuality of the nature of this United States central bank. And most importantly to this great and powerful delusion, the congress pretends to be the helpless victim of its own creation, claiming their hands are tied and even passing laws that allow the chairman of the Fed to withhold information in any public forum or congressional inquiry, further leading the “truthers” to believe that the Fed is “private” and not bound by its creator congress. They never realize that when the chairman of the Fed sits so arrogantly across from that public inquiry of its creator congress (god), that the reason he in his official capacity and by law refuses to answer any questions is because the law prevents public disclosure of those facts addressed. In other words, the congress is asking questions of the Fed chairman that it knows its officer will not be able to answer under charges of perjury!!! And this is in turn used in media sound bites to prove the private authority of the Federal Reserve. It’s a very clever game. It is called govern-ment (mind control) for a reason, for even the most ardent seeker of the Truth is blinded by its power. And inversely, the universal church stands only to subvert men from discovering the very Real Truth presented in the Bible, a Truth that would utterly destroy all denominations (proper names) of “Christianity,” a false and flattering title of no substance created by the Roman Caesar. The word Christian was certainly not a creation of christ or of God, and christ never directed anyone to become a legal “Christian.” Quite the opposite. Again, this is covered in triplicate in my upcoming volumes of research.

My in depth research long ago uncovered this idiocy about the many false rumors surrounding the Federal Reserve system, and the actual, primarily sourced reality about this agency of government can be found here:

Link–> https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2012/06/23/the-incontrovertible-conundrum-of-dr-ron-paul/

Link–> https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2012/09/01/todays-creatures-from-jekyll-island/

Link–> https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2014/10/27/stop-the-religion-of-the-fed/

—=—

Here are some prime examples of very bad research that leads so many astray and cause so much arrogance of ignorance. And yet I am somehow the enemy for routing out these vipers of disinformation that tell lies worse than any banker or agency of government by simply pointing to the actual, primary sources of information. The Truth, and only the Truth, will set you free. Applying the flattering, empty title of “truth” to anything or anyone does not necessarily, and very seldom in fact, make it so…

—=—

“Government Preparing for the End of the Federal Reserve Charter in 2013”

“The Federal Reserve Charter began on December 23, 1913. This charter was good for 100 years, ensuring the Federal Reserve’s control over the United States currency…”

Susanne Posel, excerpt from: http://occupycorporatism.com/government-preparing-for-the-end-of-the-federal-reserve-charter-in-2013/

—=—

I can’t count how many times I’ve shown this particular disinformation agent to be false, though I am unaware as to her status of useful idiot or handled asset. Whatever the case, these conspiratorial liars cause most people to miss the actual conspiracy (which is government itself) and focus on these false realities. What is the actual source of this lie remains unclear, but Suzzane Posel’s post seems to be the most often parroted among “thruthers” and their unverified, un-vetted sources.

And then there’s this type of random “truth” rumor reporting. This guy has no clue, seeking no legitimate source except by other “truthers.” How embarrassing it must be to create and support a petition to “end the 100 year charter” of the Fed when the simplest of research will reveal that the original 20 year charter was abolished by congress and changed into an unconditional perpetuity that only congress can end. And was there an apology? A correction? Anything?

—=—

From the parroting of these myths comes other logical fallacies based on the truth of the original lies, generally in the form of pointless speculation on a fictitious event and date that in reality doesn’t exist. Like December 21, 2012 as the supposed end of the world as we know it, the proclaimed end-day of the Fed came and went without a whimper, while congress laughed at all this idiocracy over a beer with Ben Bernanke and “Sir” Alan Greenspan.

—=—

And of course we cannot forget the progenitor and loud speaker of this total spoof, G. Edward Griffen, who plagiarized much of his work from Eustace Mullins without credit. Note that he says he doesn’t want to talk about what is “unpopular” in this interview, as so many “authors” of “truths” wish not to disturb the putrid pools of pond scum they have recreated. Of course not, because the “truth” movement loves and subsists on its own created lies.

—=—

While this soft and well-spoken man, who relies on the grandfatherly appearance of his trustworthiness to overshadow his untrustworthy words, just as Alex Jones relies on quite the opposite approach to quash any notion he is full of his own shit, spouts his mythology in such professional fashion, a special thanks to the website “Exposing Faux Capitalism” for breaking down the bullshit that is professed here. For the best lies are those parroted amongst actual Truths. The best salesman always uses Reality to peddle his own brand of fictions.

“Some interesting points arose out of this November 24, 2013 interview on the Big Plantation with G. Edward Griffin:

16m – In clearing up misconception about a 100-year charter for the Federal Reservehe says there originally was oneand it was later removedwhen in reality it was a 20-year charter.

19m – No JFK speech at Columbia university about breaking up Fed, as he had never even been to that university.

28m – Admits govt can shut down gold and silver, too. (In other words, its speculative value in dollars is subject only to government’s valuation.)

28m – Said it’s a good idea to have your assets tied up in gold and silver (FC: It wasn’t a good idea in 1933 and 1934, when they were confiscated, respectively!). (Funny to consider gold and silver, which is called as “lawful money,” is somehow protected from confiscation. They can take anything they want, your home, your children, your pets, and your God damned gold. No really, gold is looked down upon in the Bible folks. Seek knowledge, not gold and jewels.)

34m – Laughably says it doesn’t mean they want to back a currency with it, because it puts limits on their ability to make more money off interest. (What about the U.S. backing up its money supply from 1914 to 1933 40% by gold? Were the people crying out for that, or was it the bankers? He’s either unaware of, or intentionally concealing the historical pattern of the bankers reverting to some gold standard in order to shore up confidence in the monetary system after they’ve collapsed the current one.) (Exactly… wash, rinse, and repeat. I like this guy.)”

Link–> https://fauxcapitalist.com/2013/12/25/g-edward-griffin-on-the-alleged-100-year-federal-reserve-charter-and-his-claim-that-bankers-dont-want-a-monetary-system-based-upon-gold/ (Emphasis mine)

—=—

Well, at least the real creature Griffen got one thing right! The former charter, though 20 years not 100 years, was indeed reworked into perpetuity by congress. But he still proclaims the Federal Reserve is somehow not “federal.” Does that mean congress is not “federal” either? Unfortunately these very well-placed mistakes, either conscious or not, drive the “truth” movement into the very bowels of the darkness of ignorance.

Kudos at least to Bill Still, author of the Money Masters, though still a trumpeter and repurposer of many false quotes and mythologies parroted by others before him over and over in that “movement” and in the “truth” in documentary form, for at least coming forward to correct this “truth” that he was before unaware of and thus for verifying a rumor to be false when asked his opinion about it by the great shit factory of media entertainment corporations that is the Alex Jones’ “Infowars” machine.

—=—

—=—

Let’s take a look at the repercussions of such irresponsible reporting, as it manifests in a trickle-down effect amongst so many sincere seekers of what is really happening in the world. That is, until it reaches my eyes and ears!

From the GodLikeProductions.com forum, one member speculates that the “Federal Reserve’s 100 Year Charter Ends the SAME DAY as the Mayan Calendar ENDS.” Another post seems to challenge other members and perhaps the “truth” movement altogether with the headline “Why No Mention That The Federal Reserve’s 100 Year Charter Expires Soon,” as if some faction or element of the “truth” movement is trying to hide that fact. So funny…

TheTruthNews.com carries the headline: “Charter of the Federal Reserve Act expires in 2013,” reposting and parroting the poo flung by the original sourced monkey Suzanne Posel.

The SaviorsOfTheEarth website and forum posted this: “The U.S. Federal Reserve’s 100 Year Charter Expires ON The Now Infamous Date of December 21, 2012! …The U.S. Federal Reserve’s 100 year charter expires on the now infamous date of December 21, 2012. Its all over the net

Therefore it must be the “truth!”

Even the ALIPAC website got in on the action, again flinging Posel’s shit, when it posted: “Big Brother America: Government Preparing for the End of the Federal Reserve Charter.”

RealistNews.net’s forum included this post: “So Did The FEDERAL RESERVE give themsleves another 100 year contract? …The 99 year contract Congress gave the Federal Reserve back in 1913 has run out… why does that not matter to the public?” It then referred to another source from RumerMillNews.com, a source that has been deleted from that site, here: (http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/arc…ead=151858)

—=—

Fortunately, as word got around that this was a hoax, the “truthers” started correcting themselves in their own forums, often sounding almost disappointed that the lie wasn’t real, complete with the facts that these facts were only presented on “conspiracy” fact websites. Sadly, these things give a very bad reputation to the actual legal word conspiracy, which are thus used against all of the real cries of these sheep that unwittingly follow wolves dressed up like them. But of course there is no conspiracy from government. There cannot be. For the very definition of the word conspiracy in law is CONFEDERATION!!! Amazingly, we never wake up to the fact that we are all part of the conspiracy of government, pledging our fealty and love to it, and accepting therefore all it does against us and others.

CONFEDERACY – Criminal law. An agreement between two or more persons to do an unlawful actor an actwhich though not unlawful in itselfbecomes so by the confederacyThe technical term usually employed to signify this offenseis CONSPIRACY(Bouv1856)

CONSPIRATORS – Persons guilty of a conspiracyThose who bind themselves BY OATHcovenantor other alliance that each of them shall aid the other falsely and maliciously to indict personsor falsely to move and maintain pleas, etc. Besides these, there are conspirators in treasonable purposesas for plotting against the government. (Black4)

CON – Preposition – With. A prefix meaning withtogether. Webster. – Adjective – A slang or cant abbreviation for confidenceas a con man or a con game(Black4)

CONSPIRACY – In criminal law. combination or CONFEDERACY between two or more persons formed for the purpose of committingby their joint effortssome unlawful or criminal actor some act which is innocent in itselfbut becomes unlawful when done by the concerted action of the conspiratorsor for the purpose of using criminal or unlawful means to the commission of an act not in itself unlawfulA combination, or an agreement between two or more personsfor accomplishing an unlawful end or a lawful end by unlawful meansA partnership in criminal purposes. The essence of “conspiracy” is an agreementtogether with an overt actto do an unlawful actor do a lawful act in an unlawful manner. Mere knowledge, acquiescence, approval, or attempt on part of one to perpetuate illegal act is insufficientA conspiracy may be a continuing one; actors may drop out, and others drop inthe details of operation may change from time to timethe members need not know each other or the part played by othersa member need not know all the details of the plan or the operationshe musthoweverknow the purpose of the conspiracy and agree to become a party to a plan to effectuate that purpose. A consultation or agreement between two or more persons. either falsely to accuse another of a crime punishable by law; or wrongfully to injure or prejudice a third person, or any body of men, in any manner; or to commit any offense punishable by law; or to do any act with intent to prevent (BAR) the course of justice; or to effect a legal purpose with a corrupt intent, or by improper means. (Black4) (EMPHASIS MINE)

—=—

Silly rabbits, government cannot conspire against itself. Its very creation was the original sin, the origin and encompassment of the entirety of a conspiracy, a confederated plan and covenant by oath to create a legal corporation (district) that would falsely impersonate and cause fictional, legal attainder (corruption of blood) to all who become voluntarily its legal persons (public citizen-ships) under oath to protect it even from ourselves (domestics).

In short, the government cannot commit conspiracy against itself or its public persons, which is to say that it cannot commit evils against any of its own public creations (citizenships).

EVIL – It is an “evil” within rule that either means or end of conspiracy must be evilto frustrate or impede a government function, whether that function is performed under a constitutional or an unconstitutional law(Black4)

UNCONSTITUTIONAL – That which is contrary to the constitutionThe opposite of “constitutional.” The word DOES NOT necessarily mean that the act assailed is contrary to sound principles of legislation. (Black4)

—=—

What is evil to that which is evil is only that which is good. To evil, to a conspirator (confederate) in binding combination under a sacred oath with others, the only evil (conspiracy) is that which is opposed to the original evil (confederation/conspiracy/combination).

Perspective is everything…

And this is why the alternative media model, the “truth” and “patriot” movements, are miserable failures. Never are any of the “truths” or actual sourced research presented therein ever taken to court. It would be pointless endeavor, since all of the crimes of congress are legally licensed by their own statutes. Their own constitution even proclaims them to be immune from punishment while in their fictional seats of office and while on company (United States) business. No story is ever followed through. It’s just a vomitous spew of information, a convincing mix of lies with realities. And it’s worthless. It means nothing without the courts opinion of it. There is no conspiracy because the conspirators sit in judgement over their own conspiracy. It’s a closed loop system. Nothing Alex Jones and other information vomiters has ever gone past the microphones and the $19.99 DVD’s and books they prostitute. It’s just info, and the real war is to ensure disclosure without any effect or punishment. The war on our minds is to cause in us a collective stillness, so that as long as the so-called  “truth” is being told, surely something will be done about it. But nothing ever happens.

This is the stagnant cesspool of these information pushers, a false dialectic that directs the mind into believing that merely speaking about and “exposing” the crimes is somehow akin to a public lynching. But the lynch-pin stays safely secured. The hangman retired long ago. And the only actual event taking place, the only real Truth, is that the bank accounts and egos of these disinformation agents are getting a whole lot fatter.

To be clear, what this commercial congress creates has nothing to do with the constitution. They wear two hats, de jure (of law) and de facto (illegitimate). Their public laws and statutes with regards to commerce are a separate aspect of government, a side business that has nothing to do with the constitution. Legislation by congress in commercial matters (in mammon) need not be at all constitutional, and its evils “within rule” cannot be questioned or challenged, lest the challenger be in conspiracy against government. We must understand that most of the functionality of congress is indeed unconstitutional, prima facie, and deals only with those of us in public citizenship to its district. Citizenships of the United States, as creations of the District of Columbia, are not protected in any way by the constitution. A federal (non-State) citizenship is purely commercial in its nature, having nothing to do with the negative constitutional protections that private citizens (landholders of the private/several States) enjoy.

If you can understand the following definitions, then you can understand why a United States citizen-ship stands only without unalienable rights in a commercial franchise of usury, of usufruct, of voluntary servitude, and is not a party to the constitution, which protects only the negative, reserved rights of private (not public) State citizens. The international law of nations under admiralty/maritime law is not the same as the private law of the several (private) States (the People).

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA – A territory situated on the Potomac river, and being the seat of government of the United States. It was originally ten miles square, and was composed of portions of Maryland and Virginia ceded by those states to the United States; but in 1846 the tract coming from Virginia was retroceded. Legally it is neither a state nor a territorybut is made subjectby the constitutionto the exclusive jurisdiction of congress. (Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th edition)

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA – IS NEITHER A STATE NOR A TERRITORY. Congress is authorized to exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as mayby Cession of particular Statesand the Acceptance of Congressbecome the Seat of the Government of the United States.” Maryland and Virginia ceded territory on the Potomac, which Congress, by act of July 16, 1790, accepted. In December, 1800, the seat of government was removed from Philadelphia. By the act of July 11,1846, Congress retroceded the county of Alexandria to Virginia. The District constitutes the county of WashingtonA CITIZEN OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IS NOT A CITIZEN OF A STATEThe laws in force December 1, 1873, were revised and republished, by direction of Congress, in a separate volume known as the Revised Statutes relating to the District of Columbia. (W.C. Anderson’s Dictionary of Law, 1889)

—=—

For further clarification, let us view the history of this district as told in Federal case of DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, a Municipal Corporation, Petitioner, v. OCEAN RISK RETENTION GROUP, INC:

Sections 1 and 18 of the act of congress of February 21, 1871, entitled ‘An act to provide a government for the District of Columbia‘ (16 St. 419), are as follows: ‘Section 1. That all that part of the territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia be, and the same is herebycreated into a government by the name of the District of Columbiaby which name it is hereby constituted a body corporate for municipal purposesand may contract and be contracted withsue and be suedplead and be impleadedhave a sealand exercise all other powers of a municipal corporation not inconsistent with the constitution and laws of the United States and the provisions of this act.’ ‘Sec. 18. That the legislative power of the District shall [129 U.S. 141, 144] extend to all rightful subjects of legislation within said Districtconsistent with the constitution of the United States and the provisions of this actsubjectneverthelessto all the restrictions and limitations imposed upon states by the tenth section of the first article of the constitution of the United States… These sections are carried forward into the act of congress of June 22, 1874, entitled ‘An act to revise and consolidate the statutes of the United Statesgeneral and permanent in their naturerelating to the District of Columbia, in force on the first day of December, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and seventy-three,’ as sections 2, 49, 50…

And Whereas: The Constitution does provide that Congress has the power to exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever over such district not exceeding ten miles square, as may, by session of particular states and the acceptance of Congress, BECOME THE SEAT OF GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES.

And Whereas: On February 21, 1871, the Forty First Congress passed an act entitled “An Act to Provide a Government for the District of Columbia,” legislating the organization of a municipal corporation to run the day to day affairs of the District of Columbiathe seat of governmentwhich transferred the United States of America, the Republic, INTO “A CORPORATE ENTITY” entitled UNITED STATESin capital lettershaving “no” jurisdiction outside the District of Columbia.

And Whereas: Congress adopted the text of the federal constitution as the constitution or charter of this municipal corporationThis municipal corporation was granted the power TO CONTRACT to provide municipal services to the inhabitants of the District of Columbia and necessarily as an operation of the privileges and immunity clause of Article Four of the Constitutionany other person who chooses to contract for its services.

—=—

A difficult pill to swallow, we must realize that citizenship to the United States is a contractual relationship. But more to the point, we must take into consideration the maxims (principles) of law, which state that the contract makes the law. The laws of the federal government of the United States are public laws which do not effect or bind the private “People” of each State. But a contracted, public United States citizen-ship is a creation of the United States, and the maxim (principle) of law states that the creator controls. A man that stands privately (non-commercially) has no citizen-ship (vessel) of the United States, respecting that union only as a compact in conspiracy (confederation) that stands to protect his reserved rights of privacy. But a man acting in the agency of a public person (legal status) created by the United States under contract is the opposite of the private man acting as a State citizen, and retains nothing of his God-given or unalienable rights thereof, opting instead to a contractual state in subjection and voluntary servitude (under the doctrine of master and servant) to that district. A United States person only exists in the extended jurisdiction of the District of Columbia, also known as “the United States,”

—=—

“…This position is assented to by Chief Justice MARSHALL, speaking for this court, in the case of Hepburn v. Ellzey, 2 Cranch, 445, 452, where the question was whether a citizen of the District could sue in the circuit courts of the United States as a citizen of a stateThe court did not deny that the District of Columbia is a state in the sense of being A DISTINCT POLITICAL COMMUNITYbut held that the word ‘state‘ in the constitutionwhere it extends the judicial power to CASES BETWEEN CITIZENS OF THE SEVERAL “STATES, REFERS TO THE STATES OF THE UNION

“…it was held that parties residing in one county could not be said to be beyond the seas,’ or in a different jurisdiction, in reference to the other countythough the two counties were subject to different lawsWe are clearly of opinion that the plaintiff (as the DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA) IS A MUNiCIPAL CORPORATIONhaving a right to sue and be suedand subject to the ordinary rules that govern the law of procedure between private persons.

Corporations are ‘PERSONS IN THE LAW. There is no apparent reason why they should not be included in the statuteIt is conceded that private corporations are included

It cannot apply to the sovereign powerof course. No restrictive laws apply to the sovereign unless so expressed. And especially no laws affecting a right on the ground of neglect or laches, because neglect and laches cannot be imputed to himAnd it matters not whether the sovereign be an individual monarchor a republic or stateThe principle applies to all sovereigns. The reason usually assigned for this prerogative is that the sovereign is not answerable for the delinquencies of his agents. But, whatever the true reason may be, such is the general law,—such the universal law, except where it is expressly waivedThe privilegehoweveris a prerogative oneand cannot be challenged by any PERSON INFERIOR to the sovereignwhether that person be natural or corporate

The doctrine is well understoodthat to the sovereign power the maxim ‘nullum tempus occurrit regi‘ applies, and that the United States and the several states are notwithout express wordsbound by statutes of limitationAlthough municipal corporations are considered as public agencies, exercisingin behalf of the statepublic duties, there are many cases which hold that such corporations are not exempt from the operation of limitation statutesbut that such statutesat least as respects all real and personal actionsrun in favor of and against these corporations in the same manner and to the same extent as against natural persons.’ In Evans v. Erie Co., 66 Pa. St. 222, 228, SHARSWOOD, J., says: ‘That the statute of limitations runs against a county or other municipal corporationwe thinkcannot be doubtedThe prerogative is that of the sovereign alonenullum tempus occurrit reipublicaeHer granteesTHOUGH ARTIFICIAL BODIES CREATED BY HERare in the same category with natural persons‘…

—METROPOLITAN R. CO. v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Decided: October 21, 1889 – 132 U.S. 1 (10 S.Ct. 19, 33 L. Ed. 231) Nathaniel Wilson and Walter D. Davidge, for plaintiff in error. A. G. Riddle and H. E. Davis, for defendant in error. BRADLEY, J.

—=—

To have public (federal) citizenship in the United States, which is seated in the municipal corporation of Washington D.C., is to no be a citizen privately of any State. We have all been duped by the birth certification process, which is the creation of a legal United States entity (legal person), to contract in that person as agents of the principality of the United States. We confirm and ratify our public person-hood with every signature, every benefit taken, every number assigned, and every expression of use of that commercial vessel (ship) until finally, at the age of consent or “adulthood,” we enter into legalized (licensed) adultery in that commercial jurisdiction of mammon. We are thus rendered unto Caesar (the district).

No legally created entity (admixed corporate name) of the commercial government of the United States has unalienable rights, for national citizenship is the opposite of being a private State citizen, being as one who reserves all non-franchised, natural law rights under God. The very notion of public or national citizenship is very much a lean on all such “God-given” rights, which are replaced by a commercial franchise under contractual relationship called as “freedom” within the jurisdiction of the United States. All the goyim born in the nations united around the world are under the contract of this synagogue of satan, causing us to act adversarial to our very nature and best interests, and placing us into a hopeless state of land-less commercial being in abandonment of our God. It matters not what your religion is, you have a god (magistrate). Your god is either Natural or unnatural, legal fictions or Reality. The choice to contract in the person (status) of another, of a municipal corporation subservient to congress, is the choice to accept the artificial state and its magistrates and administrative judges as your god, the creator of the legal status (person) you play the part of. The ship (person) of the United States citizen is under the control of these legal gods, while the Bible, as being part of the common law, is abandoned under said contract of U.S. citizenship. The common law does not apply to U.S. citizens, meaning that the state is free (separate) from the church, and more specifically that no moral, spiritual, or natural law of any kind applies to the contracted relationship. The U.S. citizenship, standing in total abandonment of all God-given rights, is purely a legal commercial entity.

For those who dismiss the Bible because they have dismissed the True Nature of what religion actually is, an act of sheer ignorance, let us examine this choice between being private and contracting in public. To act in religion against the legal law of man and to accept a false, flattering title of some corporation calling itself legally as a “religion” are two completely different things. Flattering titles do not make the man. And “Christian” is an empty word, as are all of its denominations (names) stemming from the “Catholic” universal legal church and state. And so, if the reader wishes to discover why he or she is a slave to this system of deceit and piracy, why his patriotic “truths” never seem to jive with the realities experienced under this legal police state, you better loose your ego and fully comprehend the following, and realize that the corporate, legal church and state, no matter what it calls itself, can only be antichrist in its artificial nature.

CHRISTIAN – One who believes or assents to the doctrines of Christianity, as taught by Jesus Christ in the New Testament, or whobeing BORN of Christian parents or IN A CHRISTIAN COUNTRY, does not profess any other religion, or does not belong to any one of the other religious divisions of manSee NAME(W.C. Anderson’s Dictionary of Law, 1889)

CHRISTIANITY – The religion established by Jesus Christ. 2. Christianity has been judicially declared to be a part of the common law of Pennsylvania… To write or speak contemptuously and maliciously against itis an indictable offense(Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856)

CHRISTIANITY – The system of doctrines and precepts taught by Christ; the religion founded by Christ. Christianity is said to be part of the common law. Christianity is parcel of the laws of England; and, therefore, to reproach the Christian religion is to speak in subversion of the law.” “The essential principles of natural religion” and “of revealed religion, are a part of the common lawso that any person reviling or subverting or ridiculing them may be prosecuted at common law.” “The true sense of the maxim is that the law will not permit the essential principles of revealed religion to be ridiculed and reviled.” Christianity is a part of the common law of Pennsylvania in the qualified sense that its divine origin and truth are admitted, and therefore it is not to be maliciously and openly reviled and blasphemed against, to the annoyance of believers or the injury of the publicNot Christianity founded upon any particular religious tenets; but Christianity with liberty of conscience to all men. The maxim does not mean that Christianity is an established religionnor that its preceptsby force of their own authorityform part of our system of municipal lawnor that the courts may base their judgments upon the Biblenor that religious duties may be penally enforcednor that legal discrimination in favor of Christianity is allowed. The best features of the common law, especially those which regard the family and social relations, if not derived from, have at least been improved and strengthened bythe prevailing religion and the teachings of its sacred Book. But the law does not attempt to enforce the precepts of Christianity on the ground of their sacred character or divine origin. Some of those precepts, though we may admit their continual and universal obligation, we must nevertheless recognize as being incapable of enforcement by human laws. Those precepts, moreover, affect the heart, and address themselves to the conscience; while the laws of the state can regard the outward conduct onlyFOR WHICH REASONS CHRISTIANITY IS NOT PART OF THE LAW OF THE LAND IN ANY SENSE WHICH ENTITLES THE COURTS TO TAKE NOTICE OF AND BASE THEIR JUDGEMENTS UPON ITexcept so far they can find that its precepts and principles have been incorporated in and made a component part of the law of the StateThe maxim can have NO REFERENCE TO THE LAW OF THE NATIONAL GOVERNMENT, since the sources of that law are the CONSTITUTIONTREATIESAND ACTS OF CONGRESS. (W.C. Anderson’s Dictionary of Law, 1889)

—=—

The key to understanding here is the difference between who established the religion. The religion of christ is the Bible, as the law of God, christ being the example of how man is to act in accordance with that Highest spiritual Law of God and no other, despite all other temptations, and also known by such modern names as the Natural Law and equitableness (but not as “equality”). The Catholic religion was started by Caesar, a flattering legal title forced upon all his pagan citizenry, carried on by the immortal office of “Pope,” and guarded legally and violently throughout history by the vatican city-state. Thus our legal person of the state falls under the law of the establisher of the church, just as the constitution was militarily “established” and religiously “ordained” as one entity. Separation is not divorce, just a really bad relationship. The church and state, as we have just read and by whatever name we denominate it under, are both opposed to the Natural Law of God, and always stand in combination to enslave by deception. All persons, all corporations, are unnatural. There are no exceptions.

To remain as a private man, one must follow this unwritten law as part of the common law, which is to say the the common law may only be invoked by those who have not sold their soul in to the public, commercial citizen-ship of mammon. This is not to say that the common law is at all a good thing, only that the choice must be made to follow the scriptural law so that the common law recognizes our intent above whatever civil fiction and artificial rights of its legal franchise. As for the rest of the common law, which amounts mostly to the Roman law and to court decisions, presidents, and opinions of the Bar Associations both national and international, we must realize that the common law allows each man his own individual choice to either act religiously (spiritually and morally in privacy under God’s Law) or legally (artificially and in evil under the fictional persona of the state in public show). It’s all about choice. And in this completely corrupted society of nations united in evil under the one world government and “universal” religion, it has become custom to automatically accept this form of voluntary, indentured slavery from birth. The entirety of society, from education to entertainment, is an evil (conspiratorial) design to injure (bring into legal jurisdiction and law) all men. Choice has been turned into a causality, the acceptance of citizenship to the United States merely a causal effect of public education and thus public-mindedness passed on from generation to generation, until the once public knowledge has been turned into the jealously guarded secrets of the secretaries of the state. The greatest secret of the corporate church and state is their purposeful inducement of complete ignorance of both the scriptural and legal systems of law, to the point where today the only way we can identify with the Truth of Reality is to call ourselves by another flattering title with no substance, as “truthers” and “patriots.” But the real Truth is that we cannot take back our country because it was never ours to begin with. We are not its creators and so cannot be its sovereigns. The hardest Truth is that we can only take back our Self, our spiritual identities, by relinquishing our contractual relationship with the district that distrains and distresses us in seizure (Caesar). For the only country that we can ever take back is God’s Country. For to be a citizenship of the United States or of any other legal entity, nation, or State, is to take another god before the One True God of Nature, as is written in scripture (and thus unwritten in the common law). The creator controls. The Highest God wins. And the surname as a legal attachment defeats the authority of the christian name, for in the legal law all is backwards, unnatural, and so the last name is considered as the first name, as the last will and testament of the man acting in agency to a principal legal god of some nation.

—=—

“For all the gods of the nations are idols…”

—Psalms 96:5, KJB

—=—

To be more clear, and as is detailed beyond doubt in my forthcoming works, of which this blog post is merely a minute microcosm of that detailed, multi-volumed digest and encyclopedic reference guide of True knowledge and of self-evidence, a public citizenship is a foreigner in whatever private (several) State he resides in. The word several as legally defined and used in United States law means private or foreign. Thus the United States is a foreign “state” as compared to the several States (private, landholding People). The domicile and artificial existence of any United States person (a legal, public status) is only within the jurisdiction of the United States, and its residence is as a public easement or license to commercially partake in public things and trade. It cannot tread on the private lands of the private People of each private (several) State. For the United States citizen-ship (commercial vessel), all trade is thus interstate commerce, for a United States citizenship only ever exists in a temporary residence within any private State, its “home” and father (family) being only the federal District it is birthed and registered into. And as my works reveal, the climax of this stranger-than-fiction story is simply this: no United States citizen-ship may hold land in perfect or “alodial” title, which means that we are a fictional “people” that are always trespassing on the privately held land of one of the private People (as the privately constituted We, the People), having no land (castle/kingdom/sovereignty) of our own, existing only to serve those private masters through that municipal corporation in public, commercial, interstate franchise. The conspirators created the United States to protect their own private land holdings against us, against their goyim, and have slowly caused mass ignorance amongst the general (goyim) population so that they may, with each new “generation,” cheat (escheat) us all out of our rightful blood inheritance over the lands of our ancestors. Public citizenship under the United States is not the same as being a private State citizen over (as creator/god of) the United States. Public law effects only public persons, and the de facto congress in its commercial hat only creates public law.

This is the legal matrix we have slowly been deceived and tricked into accepting as our false reality, under a false id-entity, and the alternative “truth” and “patriot” movements are there to perpetuate the mythos that all citizens, public and private, national and State, are “equal.” Nothing could be farther from the Truth. For in true Orwellian style, only slaves can be made to be equal. Equality is not equitableness under the Natural Law of God. Equality is a forced “right” required to be respected by each citizen-ship. Equity is the law of persons, not men. The scriptural, moral law is that man must be equitable in his relations with all other men, never acknowledging his persons or flattering titles of that legal realm. This is True wisdom, the hidden mysteries never taught by the church and state, for the Bible is very much opposed to all things legally established, be they fictionally “commercial” or “religious” institutions. And so we may understand why the church is said to be false. The whore of Babylon to which so may prostitute themselves to. There is such a massive difference between “legal” equality (the voluntary slavery of public citizenship) and Natural equity (non-commercial privacy), which is a conformity with the Natural Law (God’s Law). To be public is to be aliened. It is to believe (love) fiction over reality (God’s “Creation”). It is to respect artifice, otherwise known as a license to live in sin through legalized adultery (adulthood). It is to be in the legal tender bosom of mammon.

The reader cannot get caught up in these terms, for this is not a debate over evolution and creationism. These are the conceits of fools, the vomit of ignorant men acting like dogs by doing their master’s bidding according to their public training. God simply means that which is self-evident. We need not personify this self-evident Reality of Nature into a white-bearded man sitting upon some cloud-strewn throne, though it is much easier to tell the story of the moral, scriptural law through such personification and anthropomorphizing of the allegorical parables of the Bible. These stories were told because most of the population was kept in illiteracy, so that the law could be comprehend vulgarly though never mastered. In today’s societies, the masses have been taught to read and write, but the language that is taught causes more confusion that that old system of purposeful illiteracy. And so the mongrel English language is known secretly as the language of illiteracy, also known as “dog-Latin.” For when we speak in this vulgar tongue of the commonalty in the legal jurisdiction, where most terms carry the opposite or opposing definitions to Reality and Nature, the gods of the courts hear only their Roman, Latin meaning, otherwise known as legalese. And so the professors of the English language are at best at the top of the illiteracy chain gang, and at worst are merely choking on their own conceit. To learn the legal language, as well as that language for which the Bible is written in, is not only to learn an entirely new language that appears exactly the same as the one we currently bark like dogs, but is also a completely figurative and metaphoric thought process that must be mastered. It is the fictional representation of reality. It is the matrix code of that which is adversarial (satanic) to God’s Nature and self-evidence, a system built completely upon the deceit of opposites, of false words describing fictional creations of legal gods. As I said before, our individual choices establish our god, and one way or another we all have a god. This is the True nature of choice, and these masters of delusion have managed to place us all into a causality loop where choice is made to appear as the actual illusion. And so we choose without comprehension of the available choice to contract with the fiction. After all, as the story is universally told, the devil may only steal our mind, body, and soul through our own voluntary contract and signature.

If I could impart one thing to the reader today so that this totality of opposition can be made clear between the organized corporations called as “religions” and what the Bible actually is, or rather what the word God (as “Jehovah”) actually means in the Bible, it would be simply this: the Truth is never that which is offensive, only defensive. Jehovah is defined as a verb, not merely an empty noun (name), whereas the word “god” is used in most instances throughout the Bible, thanks to the King James translators, as the words theos, elohim, archon, king, magistrate, prince, and other legal names and flattering titles of false gods. This word magistrate (god) is defined as kings, presidents, governors, mayors, judges, etc. And so the commonalty of goyim have been taught to despise the God of Nature by mistaken identity, as if the God of Nature is the same destructive and murdering force as the gods spoken of in the Bible. In a nutshell, the false doctrines of the corporate church teaches that God (Jehovah) is to be blamed for the actions of man (also named as “god” in the translated scriptures). And what would one expect from a false god than to translate the word king as god? And so in the simplest terms, the Bible can be summed up by merely stating that God represents Reality and Nature. That which is of God is opposed to and opposite of that which is a creation of man, as either physical or conceptual inventions, which includes the legal law of man that stands directly opposed to God, to Nature, and thus to Reality, all of which are merely words that mean the self-evident Truth. Jehovah (God) is defined simply as that which is self-existent, as that which is a self-evident Truth. And so what is of the Real is said to be of the realm of God, also known as “Creation.” All else is of the realm of fiction, also known as satan. The word satan means only that which is adversarial to God, and that which is of satan’s realm is called as art, technology, artifice, fiction, legalism, and any other term of art that represents what is Real, what is self-evident, as some legal fiction. Thus all names, flattering titles, numbers, letters patent, signs, marks, identities, reputations, and any other concept of man’s legal realm can be said to be satanic, as that which is adversarial and opposed to Reality. And so we say it is opposed to God. And so the only way to be free under God with those unalienable rights spoken about in the declaration of independence is to acknowledge the common law, which is to say we must embrace the Bible as our Highest Law – not what the corporate church doctrines state as false law, and not by joining any of man’s inventions of state licensed religions, all of which are false and opposed to the scriptural Law. We must either act the part of a man in and under the Natural Law of God, or we may choose to continue acting satanically (adversarially) to God’s Nature and Law by continuing to embrace that which is opposed to it, the surname, number, and marks of this legal beast system. In this way, that which is the self-evident Truth of Reality, of what exists despite man’s inventions, is the only defense that man has against that jurisdiction of legal fiction and false law of persons. Another way of stating this is simply that God (the self-evident Truth of Nature) and only God can set us free. Only the Highest, self-evident Truth will set you free.

But in the legal realm, all that is a confirmed and ratified lie is the established and ordained “truth,” ordained by the opinions and decisions of the gods of the courts. In the realm of the adversaries, God (self-evident Truth) and Nature are the enemy. God is offensive to the legal gods, which is why they separated their commercial state from their moral church. Only when man’s religious actions are placed Higher and supra to the pretended authority of the legally combined church and state state can man claim unalienable rights. This is the self-evident Truth that is also alluded to in the so-called declaration of independence. It is a Truth that only protects those private men who reserved all their rights in privacy from their own legal creation of that incorporation of the United States. All creations of the congress of those private gods of the several States united are placed into this holding corporation called as the district of Caesar (seizure). And so the moral of the story, the moral of the scriptures bears only one True and self-evident interpretation, which is that only that which is self-evident may set you free. Only God may set you free. Respect only of God’s Law of Nature and no other false doctrine or legal system may set you free. And our only defense as men of God is the self evidence not only of Nature, but of our True Selves. To exist without name, title, number, and mark, which is to say without any form of false legal identity, is our only defense. All other “truths” that are based on lies and legal fictions are offensive to our very Nature.

You know when the Truth presents Itself because It is undeniable no matter how hard we try, generally causing pain to our ego, as that which protects our id, the false legal id-entity that controls us mentally through the artifice of man’s law and fiction. The self-evidence of God’s Nature of Reality eats away at all fallacy and utterly destroys the ego and false-flattering titles of the ignorant fools posing as info-wariers and patriotic truthers! This is the beauty of that which is in self-evidence, the only Truth that actually exists in Nature. And it is the unveiling of this self-evidence that has become my life’s work, no matter how much it hurts.

If the reader chooses to learn these self-evident and sourced Truths as I have researched, fully sourced, and represented in this and other posts and in my upcoming works, then please do so in the Pure intent of Love and Charity for which they are offered. And please oh please dispute them with anything other than these false, second and third-hand, unenlightened, false prophets and liars. Only what is Source is self-evident. At the very least, seeing this utterly complete and reenforced lie played out by so many parrots should knock that flattering title of “truth” completely out of the minds of those who fall for this consensus-based news of the “truth” of protected lies. The substance of what is Truth is not a badge, not an empty name, it is a mentality, a verb of action as that which is in self-existence without any proof of concept or invention. Only artificial things need be named and proven to exist, for only the artifice is not self-evident. Life never needs proven. Nature never needs proven. Reality never needs proven. We either sacrifice ourselves to that which is self-evident (otherwise known as the Truth God’s Creation) or we submit ourselves to these false gods, the creators of mythology and darkness. Do your own research and stop listening to these delusional quacks. Only you can discover, recognize, and respect alone what is self-evident, and only through actual source-based research will you ever stop being a fool choking on your own conceit and love of what is the big lie, the grand delusion.

The Real, spiritual enlightenment is that the Truth will always lead one back to one’s True Self as we realize that our actual Selves have been metaphorically stolen and repurposed into fictional personas of the districted nations of Caesar. Our Inner Being is thus personified into the artifice, our false id-entity assigned at birth, and our ego formed and perfected by the time we start acting in adulthood as that artificial persona of the nation, justifying our false existence and patriotically guarding our perceived but empty stake (cross) in mammon. After all, who wants to take responsibility for their own actions nowadays? Nope, it has to be the bankers, the politicians, the priests, and the devil. We can just get insurance and kill by license.

Yet all of these are fictions…

—=—

“Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest thou also be like unto him. Answer a fool according to his folly, lest he be wise in his own conceit…”

“The legs of the lame are not equal: so is a parable in the mouth of fools. As he that bindeth a stone in a sling, so is he that giveth honour to a fool. As a thorn goeth up into the hand of a drunkard, so is a parable in the mouth of fools…”

As a dog returneth to his vomitso a fool returneth to his folly. Seest thou a man wise in his own conceitThere is more hope of a fool than of him.”

—Proverbs 26: 4-5, 7-9, 11-12 KJB

 —=—

To hear these shepherds of darkness herd their sheep even as they insult the “herd mentality” is the ultimate insult to anyone who sees through their proclaimed “truths.” To hear the slave-masters complain about their slaves even as they fill their heads with crap is the most pathetic part about this artifice, for then the sheep of these shepherds go out and complain about everyone else and never face their own self-evident responsibilities. Instead of the enlightenment of the individual through knowledge and understanding of their own place in God’s Nature and binding Law, the herd is driven further into the depths of patriotic fervor in respect and protectionism (zionism) for their pirate captors, convinced in fixing and taking back something that was never theirs in the first place and that doesn’t exist in Nature, seeking a status that is not of Reality and that can only be attained through submission to the idea that man and man alone is as god and sovereign. All legal (artificial) rights come from the king, from the private families and bloodline of “the People” who created this false system of mammon. And all nations are now being united into the “United Nations” just as all states were united into the “United States.” The parabolic warnings of the Bible are coming to fruition even as you read this.

And so let us return to the mythos surrounding the central banks of all nations, as they now stand under the World Bank of that United Nations. For the story of the Fed is only just beginning…

Edward Flaherty, an academic economist and Ph.D. in the Department of Economics at the College of Charleston, S.C., called out G. Edward Griffin’s description of the secret meeting on Jekyll Island as “conspiratorial”, “amateurish”, and “suspect”. I couldn’t agree more, and have certainly reported it as so. To cut through the rhetoric presented by Griffen in order to find the verifiable facts is difficult at best, and any work that cannot stand on its own legitimacy and source material should only be considered as what it is, Roman adversaria; the opposite of that which is self-evident.

Perhaps you should have a look.

Link–> http://publiceye.org/conspire/flaherty/Federal_Reserve.html

—=—

As with all research, verify what this man has said as well. Never take myself or anyone else at their second-hand word. The difference between shock jocks and myself is that I genuinely mean it when I say do your own research and to get off of your ass and go to the correct and only Real sources, and stop listening to these conceited fools. And never take anyone’s word without so much inner consideration, for the only way to obtain True knowledge and understanding is through constant, continuous consideration, like tossing a salad of information in your mind until all the bullshit is filtered away and only Source remains, sense without nonsense, Truth without mystery. Mistakes are easy to make with friends and leaders like these. So many lies about the Fed are so prevalent and ingrained within the patriot mythos that some even worked their way into Flaherty’s  own pontifications, just as they have in my own works over so many years. My early work was quite susceptible to this monkey dung flung so indiscriminately and without care or awareness of source.

Not ironically, my work is hardly ever reposted elsewhere. No one is offering me a writing job or new radio hosting gig because no one can sell the actual Truth. you can’t sell gold when I call bullshit on its valuation and link to mammon with its more unpopular nickname of “nation killer.” No one wants to hear the story of the golden calf of the scriptural parables, where slaves of the old system combined their gold so that they could purchase themselves into the new slave system, which is exactly the reason quoted by all gold salesmen to hoard gold. They simply can’t sell anything that depends on lies and obfuscations of the parabolic scriptural teachings for its promotion. It’s as if the former gold confiscation didn’t happen, as if somehow gold has some sex-magick appeal and mystical protection that somehow makes it anything more that a tool of mammon, a tool of enslavement, and a tool of depravity that causes men to value gold more than Life, God, and Nature itself. To the corrupted mind, everything in God’s Nature can be purchased (conquered) with money in whatever form it is respected. This is the epitome of the justification for slavery, for animal and child abuse, for pollution, and for genetically modified foods, and for so many other crimes against nature that are excused by license and by monetary compensation.

To be clear, I no longer hold any sympathy for the devil. By this I mean that, by exposing these liars and their lies as the devils they are, I seek only to break the hypnotic spell they have over their listeners and readers, and hopefully over their very own Selves, and in turn wish only to expose them to same pain and suffering caused by the destructive power of their own hypnotic but false suggestions. I seek not to make fools of anyone, for as christ said I am not here to judge anyone, but only to set them on the correct course so that their final judgement and place may be secured. We don’t realize that to be in legal citizenship is to be pre-judged (doomed) at birth. We never quite understand that before we set foot in any jurisdiction and court of the gods that created our strawman (legal person/status) we have already been pre-judged, and that a plea (prayer) to that judicial god of “innocent” is not an option. There is no innocence in the legal realm. Only a man responsible for his own actions can account himself as innocent, his only judge the self-evidence of God’s Law of Nature and duty to It. Heaven awaits us all, for heaven is merely that which is untouched by man’s fictions, the Nature of God’s Creation. Citizenship is scripturally and legally speaking a spiritual death, a mort-gage (dead pledge) in mort-main (dead hands), and the jurisdiction of the United States is nicknamed as hell. The district and jurisdiction of the United States is an open-air debtor’s prison, make no mistake about it. And only the scriptural path walked by christ and manifested through our own actions may take us out of that fictional, districted jurisdiction.

HELL – The name formerly given to a place under the exchequer chamberwhere the king’s debtors were confined. (Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th edition)

—=—

Welcome to the new age, my friends. For the franchise of hell is going global. A world of debtors is being created. For we must remember that all debt in whatever form it presents itself is a legal obligation that must be performed in legal form, a legal person (status), and so all debt is a performance debt. All debtors of the nations united under one kingdom of hell on earth must act the parts assigned and respected by them, as the world citizenship (debt obligation) of this United Nations construct and legal matrix rears its ugly head.

And what about an apology, and admission of tomfoolery?

To not verify the existence of an ending 100-year charter is inexcusable, and to promote it knowingly without verification and without apology for so many past lies and predictions should cause his media empire to fall just as much as any mainstream outlet. No apology or corrections were publicly submitted by Susanne Posel, Alex Jones, James Corbett, G. Edward Griffen, or any other con artist or useful idiot out there to my knowledge at the time of this writing, even after so many outlets have reposted and supported their rhetoric and works.

I want to be clear here that no one in their right mind should for one second consider that these agents of the planned apocalypse like Alex Jones are not aware of these fictions they sell as reality. For again we are deceived into following these false prophets of artificial, non-self-evidnet information even in our understanding of what the word apocalypse actually means.

—=—

“The Masons hold their grand festival on the day of St. John, not knowing that therein they merely signify the fish-god Oannes, the first Hermes and the first founder of the Mysteriesthe first messenger to whom the Apocalypse was givenand whom they ignorantly confound with the fabulous author of the common Apocalypse. The sun is then (midsummer day) in its greatest altitude. In this the Naros is commemorated.”

—Book of Enoch (vol. ii., p. 154)

—=—

“The miter is derived directly from the miters of the ancient pagan fish-god Dagon and the goddess Cybele.  The papal miter represents the head of Dagon with an open mouthwhich is the reason for the pointed shape and split top.”

—Ruben Joseph, excerpt from: ‘Why Are The Young People Leaving The Church ’

—=—

In their veneration and worship of Dagonthe high priest of paganism would actually put on a garment that had been created from a huge fish… The head of the fish formed a mitre above that of the old man, while its scaly, fan-like tail fell as a cloak behind, leaving the human limbs and feet exposed.”

— Austen Henry Layard, excerpt from: ‘Nineveh and Babylon’

—=—

The most prominent form of  worship in Babylon was dedicated to Dagon, later known as Ichthys, or the fish. In Chaldean times, the head of the church was the representative of Dagon, he was considered to be infallibleand was addressed as ‘Your Holiness’. Nations subdued by Babylon had to kiss the ring and slipper of the Babylonian god-kingThe same powers and the same titles are claimed to this day by the Dalai Lama of Buddhismand the Pope. Moreover, the vestments of paganism, the fish mitre and robes of the priests of Dagon are worn by the Catholic bishopscardinals and popes. Ea Enki, who is a God of Sumerian (Enki) and Babylonian (Ea) mythology… was a water god who was half manhalf fish hybrid. In Greek mythology, Ea was known as Oannes… It is believed that, in the daytime, this deity would emerge from the water and was responsible for teaching artscience and writing to the human race.

—Mary E. Walsh, excerpt from: ’Wine of Roman Babylon’ 

—=—

“At first they led a somewhat wretched existence and lived without rule after the manner of beasts. But, in the first year after the flood appeared an animal endowed with human reason, named Oannes, who rose from out of the Erythian Sea, at the point where it borders Babylonia. He had the whole body of a fishbut above his fish’s head he had another head which was that of a manand human feet emerged from beneath his fish’s tailHe had a human voiceand an image of him is preserved unto this day. He passed the day in the midst of men without taking food; he taught them the use of letterssciences and arts of all kinds. He taught them to construct citiesto found templesto compile lawsand explained to them the principles of geometrical knowledge. He made them distinguish the seeds of the earthand showed them how to collect the fruitsin short he instructed them in everything which could tend to soften human manners and humanize their laws. From that time nothing material has been added by way of improvement to his instructions. And when the sun set, this being Oannes, retired again into the sea, for he was amphibious.”

—Writings of Berossus, a 3rd century Babylonian priest

—=—

If hell is that which is adversarial to the Nature of Reality and self-evident Truth, then what in Heaven’s name can I possibly call this “truth” movement but one of the layers of that hell, existing somewhere between Fox News, Edward Bernays, Alex Jones, and the Pope?

We are taught that the apocalypse is a bad thing. But what does this word actually mean, and why would such a propagandist machine of the combined church and state be so hell-bent on obfuscating its True and self-evident meaning? Perhaps a better question is to ask what event can possibly destroy this empire built by the hands of men at the expense of all other men and through the legal fiction of false reality?

There is only one answer. It is the thing most feared by the keepers of the mysteries, of those who hide under the rose. And that is simply True knowledge.

APOCALYPSE – noun – apoc’alyps. [Gr. from to discloseand to cover.] Revelationdiscoverydisclosure. The name of a book of the New Testament, containing many discoveries or predictions respecting the future state of Christianity, written by St. John, in Patmos, near the close of the first century.(–Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1828)

REVELATION – noun – [Latin revelatusrevelo. See Reveal.] 1. The act of disclosing or discovering to others what was before unknown to them; appropriately, the disclosure or communication of truth to men by God himselfor by his authorized agentsthe prophets and apostles. How that by revelation he made known to me the mystery, as I wrote before in few words. Ephesians 3:3. 2 Corinthians 12:1. 2. That which is revealedappropriatelythe sacred truths which God has communicated to man for his instruction and directionThe revelations of God are contained in the Old and New Testament. 3. The Apocalypse; the last book of the sacred canon, containing the prophecies of St. John.(–Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1828)

OCCULT – adjective – [Latin occultusocculoob and celoto conceal.] – Hidden from the eye or understandinginvisiblesecretunknownundiscoveredundetected; as the occult qualities of matter. The occult sciences are magicnecromancy, etc. Occult lines, in geometry, are such as are drawn with the compasses or a pencil, and are scarcely visible. (–Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1828)

OCCULTATION – noun – [Latin occultatio.] 1. A hiding; also, the time a star or planet is hid from our sightwhen eclipsed by the interposition of the body of a planet. 2. In astronomy, the hiding of a star or planet from our sight, by passing behind some other of the heavenly bodies. (–Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1828)

OCCULTNESS – noun – The state of being concealed from viewsecretness. (–Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1828)

OCCULTED – adjective – Hidsecret… (–Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1828)

HID, HIDAGE – noun – [from hidea quantity of land.] An extraordinary TAX formerly paid to the kings of England for every hide of land. (–Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1828)

—=—

The whole plan, the entirety of design of these false gods of the church and state and United Nations is to cause in the minds of man a false revelation, a false apocalypse. By passing of fiction and lies as True knowledge, all of man can be manipulated and ushered into this new age system of mammon. For imagine the power of mammon when its main tool becomes cashless! This false sensationalism of unity of all nations and of all religions is ludicrous, just as the notion that the Jewish and christian Laws (the New and Old) can be practiced harmoniously together, that the Christian gentile and the Talmudic Jew can live together in equitableness when the very purpose of any nation is to create a multitude of goyim. That 1,000’s of world religions can be made into one authority under one false god and church over one false union of states by the power of legal status (world citizenship) is the final solution. For legal, religious freedom (franchise) has nothing to do with our individual actions according to our moral law, it only applies to what we think, not what we do. Expression of religion and moral law is literally illegal in a legal state.

FREEDOM OF RELIGION – Embraces the concept of freedom to believe and freedom to actthe first of which (belief) is absolute, but the second of which (action) remains SUBJECT TO REGULATION for protection of society(Black4)

—=—

Freedom of moral thought, but not freedom to act upon that conscious moral thought… This is what legal freedom is when defined by a legal corporation called government. This is not Natural freedom under God. This is tyranny named (noun) as “freedom.” Legal freedom is only a franchise of fictional persons. Governments cannot control in totality your thought processes, only your actions (anti-pro-verb). Specifically, we must recognize absolutely that the purpose of the legal law is to prevent man from acting upon his moral thoughts.

—=—

It’s impossible to have religious freedom in any nation where churches are licensed to the government.”

—Congressman George Hansen, quoted from “In Caesar’s Grip,” by Peter Kershaw

—=—

“The framers of our Constitution meant we were to have freedom of religionnot freedom from religion.”

—Billy Graham

—=—

No man can enter into a strong man’s houseand spoil his goodsexcept he will first bind the strong manand then he will spoil his house.

—Mark 3: 27, KJB

—=—

The strawman, as the legal, national citizen-ship is that bond. Our house is not our own. Our use of that artificial legal status ensures our legal performance against God, against the scriptural law as part of the common law. Our spiritual choice is nullified, though we can quit claiming to be that fictional person (i.e. adulterer/sinner) at any time we choose. The contractual relationship destroys all other considerations of Law. And the freedom of religion in legal terms is of course that which opposed to freedom of choice, for though we may not be punished for our thoughts (yet), we may and will be punished as conspirators against this legal system of government for acting upon our religious, moral thoughts, for our franchise (freedom) is false and only exists in the hell that is this open-air-prison and jurisdiction of the nations. Simply stated, the property of any United States public citizenship is not the property of the man acting in its agency. All property is registered in the strawman name, the legal fiction person, which is property of government. Thus no public man is strong. All men are in the bond of surety to their assigned legal entity of birth registration, and so all public men’s houses are despoiled by their very nature and tax (registration). This is the legal pirate cove that is the United States municipal corporation. Its sole purpose is to escheat (steal) all that is Real, from Land to personal property, away from the goyim born of the nations so that no matter where we go we are always in trespass upon the lands of the “sovereignty.” We know we are not sovereign in the view of the law because we must produce an artificial will so as to pass on out imperfect titles to property and pay a death or orphan tax on it. The law automatically recognizes the bloodline heirs of a private citizen of any State.

In the “truth” and “patriot” movements we have been trained to embrace this word “sovereignty” by name without realizing its dualistic nature. As perhaps the most misunderstood legal term out there, we mistake the Highest Law and authority of the Sovereignty of God with that of the kingdoms that claim legal, artificial “sovereignty” in name only over that of all other men. But we must understand that sovereignty cannot exist except under the doctrine of master and servant. Sovereignty is pointless without subjects or slaves beneath you. In other words, if all men were sovereign then no man would be, just as no man is free until all men are free. This totality of Natural Sovereignty under God’s Law is the only Real Sovereignty, and it signifies only that all men have abandoned all artifice and legal fiction so as to obey only the Nature and Duty of the negative, Natural Law. This state of being is heaven on earth. It is also paradox, for men will always seek to enslave or trick other men in order to cause themselves ease and vagrancy of that Highest Duty. The false artifice of sovereign nations, the gods of which are legally created titles as idols, created these nations not to free men but to publicly ensnare them in legal protectionism of their own private estates. And the United Nations and its peace-keeping force of mercenary goyim in uni-form are being assembled to protect this order of nations united to protect these private, legally sovereign bloodlines. It is not that their blood is at all special, only that it is legally recognized and not corrupted in attainder like the public masses of citizenships of the idolatrous nations. Blood and Land are intricately connected, and the absence of blood consideration is the highest goal of these pirates, so that they may overcome otherwise strong men and bind their lands into their own private estates while their tenants are none the wiser. They are simply cheaters, the root word of escheat. Their false systems of legal sovereignty are directly opposed to the scriptural Law. This sovereignty is false, a mere slave system of voluntary compliance by those in performance debt to these masters under the law of agency. It’s not Real. It’s not spiritual in any way. It is merely a modern caste system based on the old feudal state that has been renamed and reorganized, the only difference being that it is completely without honor and kept incredibly under the rose. The artificial sovereignty of the King has been replaced by the artificial sovereignty of the bloodline of the private “People.” And so we are caused to believe in the false truth that through legal means we may somehow figure out this legal system and become part of the sovereignty, which is to say become the slave-master instead of the slave. This is the strong delusion of the gods.

—=—

“We have stricken the (slave) shackles from four million human beings and brought all laborers to a common level not so much by the elevation of former slaves as by practically reducing the whole working population, white and blackto a condition of SERFDOM. While boasting of our noble deeds, we are careful to conceal the ugly fact that BY AN INEQUITOUS MONEY SYSTEM we have nationalized a system of oppression whichthough more refinedis not less cruel than the old system of chattel slavery.

–Horace Greeley (1811-1872), founder of the ‘The New-Yorker’ and ‘New York Tribune’ newspapers, speaking on post-civil war or ‘14th amendment’ citizenship

—=—

It is impossible to enslavementally or sociallya bible-reading people. The principles of the bible are the groundwork of human freedom.”

–Horace Greeley (1811-1872), founder of ‘The New-Yorker’ and ‘New York Tribune’ newspapers,

—=—

Notice that these quotes are by the same elitist man, one of the few good ones perhaps.

—=—

“In my view, the Christian religion is the most important and one of the first things in which all childrenunder a free government ought to be instructed… No truth is more evident to my mind than that the Christian religion must be the basis of any government intended to secure the rights and privileges of a free people.”

–Preface, 1828 Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language

—=—

Of course public education is designed to cause public-mindedness, and only a private man may benefit from that scriptural knowledge. As the mass of illiterates that is the general goy population collectively cheer the efforts of their private masters to eradicate the Bible scriptures from public schools, they seal their own fate and that of their future heirs into a system of total corruption and spiritual death in mammon. By corrupting each denomination of corporate churches, all of which claim the Bible as their reason for their legal existence, the public is made to despise the Bible instead of recognizing that this system of universally “Christian” churches in name and flattering title only were never intended to teach or decipher what the Bible actually instructs. The private priest class alone may have revelation (knowledge) of scripture, never the commonalty of illiterate followers of false gods. The English language (as dog-Latin) ensures that even the very fact of our own collective illiteracy is hidden behind the very words of that common (public) language spoken. Like dog’s barking at their masters, the intent of our words is taken only in their dualistic, adversarial, Latinized (Romanized) versions so that everything we say carries the opposite meaning. Every respected legal name (noun) destroys the True Nature of the Reality that name represents as a legal fiction.

But I digress…

Just what is this protective agency of that fish-god Pope’s will as a motto proprio and what does it have to do with the other central banks of all the nations?

Let us examine, from the Vatican’s own website, just what is this Financial Intelligence Authority:

—=—

THE FINANCIAL INFORMATION AUTHORITY

The Financial Information Authority (Autorità di Informazione Finanaziaria – AIF)is the competent authority of the Holy See/Vatican City State for fighting money-laundering and financing of terrorism. In that capacity, the AIF carries out the tasks of financial intelligence unit and supervisor, both for prudential purposes, and the prevention and countering of money-laundering and financing of terrorism.

Established by Pope Benedict XVI with the Apostolic Letter in form of “Motu Proprio” of 30 December 2010, AIF’s institutional mandate has been consolidated by means of the Apostolic Letter in form of Motu Proprio by Pope Francis on 8 August 2013, which assigns to the AIF the role of prudential supervision, and by means of the Apostolic Letter in form of “Motu Proprio” by Pope Francis on 15 November 2013, which approved the new StatutesThe AIF carries out its institutional activity according to the Vatican Law n. XVIII of 8 October 2013.

The AIF is a member of the Egmont Group, the GLOBAL NETWORK of financial intelligence units, and, so far, has stipulated Memoranda of Understanding with the financial intelligence units of various Countries for the purposes of COLLABORATION and exchange of information, like, inter alia, Albania, Australia, Argentine, Belgium, Cyprus, Cuba, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Malta, Monaco, Netherlands, Norway, Paraguay, Peru, Poland, Romania, San Marino, Spain, Slovenia, Switzerland, United Kingdom and United States of America.

–Palazzo San Carlo, 00120 Città Del Vaticano – Link–> http://www.aif.va/ENG/Home.aspx

—=—

For the benefit of the reader that is seldom taught the legal meanings of words, this term of the legal art understanding does not simply mean comprehension. To understand anything in legal terms is to stand under the authority of that thing, artificial as it may be, and to be in harmonious agreement with another law just as any signature on any contract expresses an under-standing to both the words of that contract and to all laws and governmental statutes that protect and secure that contractual situation between “persons.” And so the reader, as a public “citizen-ship” of any nation, should know here that with every signature we individually make in legal persona we are agreeing to every single public law created by congress and by its “independent agencies” of government, including the Federal Reserve and other central banking institutions and non-governmental (NGO) associations and institutions hired and respected by congress. No man is bound by any legal authority or law without his voluntary use of its status in legal persona. Whatever I do as “Clint Richardson” is as an agent of its creator and principal, the United States district (Caesar). This is the opposite of that state of free liberty under the Natural (God’s) Law spoken of by those Masonic founders in their federalist papers and over-parroted quotes. A national citizen is not a citizen of any private State. Nothing public is private. A citizenship is very much like the Federal Reserve, having quite limited independence within the jurisdiction (open-air prison) of United States borders, but having no actual freedom but that which is granted to it in legal franchise. A public person is not a free man, for a person is never a man, only a recreated fiction of law. A form without substance. To act in person is to act as the property of another. And the persons (ships) of all nations, like the rental cars of some rental car agency, are all bound to this international, globalist law of mammon. Whether you believe in gods or not, he who creates controls as a god. The creator of “Clint Richardson” is certainly not God, it is the United States district (bank). What is unnatural can never invoke what is natural. What is a creation of man and his artful law cannot claim the law of God and of Nature. And what is written in the Declaration of Independence is for Real men of God, not artificial persons created by governments. Only those who reserve all rights from the nation privately stand in True Liberty and Natural Freedom. This confusion between what is Real and what is fiction is the essence of that system of slavery that holds us all in its legal matrix.

We mustn’t forget three things…

  1. True “christianity” is part of the common law, unwritten and unenforceable, and has no place in the jurisdiction of the United States, only outside of it in private.
  2. The Bible bestows upon every man a choice, to face Reality (God) or exist falsely in the artificial, flattering titles of legal fiction. Thus its purpose as part of the common law is self-evident, and is used by the most evil of men to kill our highest spiritual power and will through ignorance of it.
  3. The word legal translates to that which is opposed to God, as the fictional art constituted over Nature.

If these three principals of law would be under-stood, then what man in legal citizenship under Caesar (district) would possibly continue in such a false existence? What man would continue to exist falsely in such a chimeric, false persona as this, knowing that this false existence is the realm and jurisdiction of a global system united in support and pursuit of the great delusions of mammon?

The answer, I’m afraid, is most men.

I am resigned to this notion. I accept it for what it is. And I am only writing here today that I might reach the remainder, the remnant, the seekers of self-evidence in all things as the Only Truth despite the pain of such self-evidence. You are who I seek. We must find each other, overcome, and remove ourselves from this fiction of religion, governments, and most of all money. This is my life’s goal and my works will be solely for its purpose and end.

This global system of mammon and these protection agencies that have been set up in all the key nations united in preserving this system of debt slavery is wholly supported by the Pope and thus by that Crown corporation of the Vatican. This false “Christ” (falsely anointed) head of the church and state of the world has decreed that in this den of thieves we call the banking system of the world, there must be a united effort to protect that system as the asset of the church and its city-State. This, of course, is self-evident. The actions and decrees of this and former Popes cannot be denied, and no apologist can possibly disconnect this intent from the love of money in mammon. No one can call this anything but what it self-evidently is, a protection racket against the public, legal realm instituted to ensure the debt of all nations to their central banks and of each individual “person” to the nations that created that status. To be in (under) citizen-ship is to be a debtor, to be contracted into a performance debt. A puppet on strings.

For those to whom this is a new concept, this separation of the self into a legal id-entity that removes us from Nature and causes us to act as some thing we are not, all you need to know is that whatever law you follow depends on the state of being of your Self. If you can be convinced, especially from birth and through public education and media entertainment, to act not as your True and responsible Self but as the fictional legal self of another’s persona (legal status), then nothing you possess or own is yours. Not your language, not your law, not your God, and not your stuff. All that is registered to that fictional self (citizen-ship) as a vessel of commerce of the Holy See is property of its creator (god). The creator controls, and whatever is conquered (purchased) with the patented creation of another, namely the money of each nation’s central bank, is thus the property of the creator of that money that its subjects (voluntary slaves) use in the agency of its franchise (person). This is legal, political freedom. Nothing natural about it. And this franchise of freedom and independence is what has so confounded us, causing us to believe ourselves to be as free as we believe the Federal Reserve to be. And just because there is no overlord (or congress Member) watching every move we make in our franchise of independent movement (legal freedom) throughout this commercial maze and open-air prison of jurisdiction while we act in its legal persona, we mistakenly call this as the Pure Freedom of privacy. The Fed is as private as any citizen-ship is, which is to say that only an idiot would believe, based on actual source and law, that either one of these is free of government (legal control).

I have yet to find a better definition and description of these facts than that of William C Anderson’s Dictionary of Law from 1889. Not only does he reveal the ultimate difference and more accurately the total opposition between the True and false corporate flattering title of the typical citizenship as a “Christian” in name only and without works, we also can see that when it comes to the judicial function of the administrative courts and justices (magistrate gods) we pray (plead) to for forgiveness and salvation, the Bible or for that matter any written or unwritten moral law or compass is totally absent in all decisions and opinions of these public courts. They are Godless, which means that no man may ever stand in self-evidence nor with unalienable rights under God (Natural Law). To be perfectly clear, these legal courts can only see legal things. Man must appear in the person of the state (district and circuit jurisdiction of Caesar) in order to be heard by that god of fiction. The court jurisdiction is for persons, not men. Only persons and their agents (attorneys) may be heard. A man of God is not welcome in these places, and are Barred from that system of pretended justice in commerce. Only things of mammon may apply and be artificially seen and remedied. And so all of you so-called “Christians” who follow in the footsteps of your legal person, your strawman, instead of following in the footsteps of christ, you will be judged by men as your gods because your person is pre-judged (doomed) at birth. You are acting and appearing as that which you are not, and you will be treated accordingly. You will be considered only as a legal entity that cannot be harmed, for fiction cannot be Naturally harmed.

This is not religion, damn it! This is reality. Organized religion is exclusively reserved for the weak-minded. Acting religiously is only for those of strong will and Pure character and intent, the remnant as it were, the true nonconformists. For the following of christ is not conformity to any thing, it is only the embracing of and acknowledgement of that which is self-evident Truth. To act religiously or spiritually is only the abandonment of all artifice and fiction. It is Life.

I want you to read this again:

CHRISTIANITY – The system of doctrines and precepts taught by Christ; the religion founded by Christ. Christianity is said to be part of the common law. “Christianity is parcel of the laws of Englandandthereforeto reproach the Christian religion is to speak in subversion of the law.” “The essential principles of natural religion” and “of revealed religion, are a part of the common lawso that any person reviling or subverting or ridiculing them may be prosecuted at common law.” “The true sense of the maxim is that the law will not permit the essential principles of revealed religion to be ridiculed and reviled.” Christianity is a part of the common law of Pennsylvania in the qualified sense that its divine origin and truth are admitted, and therefore it is not to be maliciously and openly reviled and blasphemed against, to the annoyance of believers or the injury of the publicNot Christianity founded upon any particular religious tenets; but Christianity with liberty of conscience to all menThe maxim does not mean that Christianity is an established religionnor that its precepts, by force of their own authorityform part of our system of municipal lawnor that the courts may base their judgments upon the Biblenor that religious duties may be penally enforcednor that legal discrimination in favor of Christianity is allowed. The best features of the common law, especially those which regard the family and social relations, if not derived from, have at least been improved and strengthened bythe prevailing religion and the teachings of its sacred BookBut the law does not attempt to enforce the precepts of Christianity on the ground of their sacred character or divine originSome of those preceptsthough we may admit their continual and universal obligation, we must nevertheless recognize as being incapable of enforcement by human lawsThose preceptsmoreoveraffect the heart, and address themselves to the conscience; while the laws of the state can regard the outward conduct onlyfor which reasons CHRISTIANITY IS NOT A PART OF THE LAW OF THE LAND IN ANY SENCE WHICH ENTITLES THE COURTS TO TAKE NOTICE OF AND BASE THEIR JUDGEMENTS UPON ITexcept so far they can find that its precepts and principles have been incorporated in and made a component part of the law of the StateThe maxim can have no reference to the law of the National government, SINCE THE SOURCES OF THAT LAW ARE THE CONSTITUTION, TREATIES, AND ACTS OF CONGRESS(–William C. Anderson’s Dictionary of Law, 1889)

–=–

This single brilliant discourse utterly destroys the false “patriot” and “truther” movement in one fail swoop, for whenever the origin and foundation of any opinion is false, the resulting occurrence of opinionated rhetoric based on nothing but a false legal religion and dialectic (logic) is all that manifests. What you have just read is the very definition of the separation of church and state, which is to say the separation of men from their religion and into a purely legal society. As long as the choice is available in the common law, the slave-state (nation) may exist as a district (seizure, distress, distraint) upon those men. The law of man may rule over any man who abandons God and accepts the idolatrous nation as his magistracy (god). And so we may either act in the spirit of our religious Self or we may act in the false persona of some nation. Either way we will have a god. To be without a nation is to be under God (Jehovah) in the Reality of Nature. This is considered a self-evident Truth, and belief in God is certainly no requirement for a self-evident Truth to Exist. The word Jehovah is defined as self-existence, which is that which is self-evident or the Whole Oneness of Nature (Creation). Man is, whether he likes or admits it or not, part of that Oneness. But its Highest law and protections may only manifest through his or her individual actions or works. The second we take upon our True Selves the name, number, trade-mark, and flattering title of another, we loose our connection to Nature and Its Law and must accept the contracted dis-ease that is required by our respect of false legal authority. Whatever we do, there is some god above us. And even the false notion of sovereignty requires a Higher Law and also respect of the slave system of legal law in some nation. For no man may be sovereign without slaves beneath him. And no man may be free until all men are free. Sovereignty is nothing more and nothing less than a legal status, legal being opposed to God, as the flattering titles of pretenders. They are the creators of church and state. They are the controllers. The land lords. The gods.

—=—

“For all the gods of the nations are idols…”

—Psalms 96:5, KJB

—=—

Thanks to the organized musings and purposeful misdirection of Alex Jones and those who emulate his fear campaigns and corporate business model in the false and empty name of “truth,” we continue to live in the lie designed for us while patriotically supporting the very nation that designed it. We suffer from the worst kind of Stockholm Syndrome imaginable. And our denomination of legalized religion merely solidifies that false nature and causes us to respect the legal state, or that which is opposed to God as the self-evident Reality of Nature and Its undeniable Truth.

To be clear, no subject will ever change this government or its system. We are not its creator nor its controller. The Jones patriot model invites everything but the correct course of action, which as the Bible instructs is to simply and utterly “leave her,” to leave the fictional cities and jurisdictions by overcoming their fictions of law by following by christ’s example. While the church preaches the false prophesy of God or Christ returning from the dead, the reality of the Bible scripture is that christ can only manifest through the actions of man acting christ-like. The spirit of God’s Law is personified as christ, and the spirit of man may only be recognized and protected by his actions thereof. Again, this is not some membership to some corporation posing as a “religion,” this is a Real Life lived only in the True Nature of Reality.

The fool in his own conceit and flattering legal title of “Christian” may be equally offended by this scriptural Truth as he who purports to carry the false, flattering title of “atheist” or “anarchist.” Yet all of these men acting pretending such false identities carry their person in the form of a driver’s license, a passport, a credit or debit ATM card, and every other sign and trade-mark of the voluntary slavery of citizenship. Trade merely means commerce, and its mark is our use of its name and “consumer protections” in legal trade under a national system of debt money in mammon. Our signature on any contract is the highest legal sign of our individual spiritual death and civil, artificial life.

—=—

“An addition [to a name] proves or shows minority or inferiority.”

— Additio probat minoritatem. (Black4)

—=—

When a man is made a spiritual peer he loses his surnamewhen a temporalhis Christian name.”

—Jonathan Swift, Thoughts on various subjects, moral & diverting

—=—

The rights of the individuals are restricted only to the extent that they have been voluntarily surrendered by the citizenship to agencies of government.”

—City of Dallas v Mitchell, 245 S.W. 944

—=—

You see, the problem isn’t the vulgar belief in the doctrines of man’s religion, it is a lack of religious, moral action against evil and artifice by otherwise strong men who are confused and bound by legal fiction and disinformation. The moral Law is not some actor’s script that is practiced like an attorney practices law or a doctor practices medicine, for these are all false and flattering titles. The path of christ is the example never followed by the flatteringly entitled “Christians” because they are trained from birth to love and respect not God but the very “law of the land” that is opposed to God. The churches are legal corporations bound under the legal state and its fictional (antichrist, anti-God, anti-Nature) law, and are therefore forced to respect the legal law and its government for their very legal existence! To be a member of a religion is not to be or act religiously. For the “Christian” is as much an empty flattering title as the “atheist” the second we touch money and participate in the legal system of contract (devilry) and mammon. Only our actions, our works, define who and what our Self is and which god it subscribes to in surety and bond. A promise (vow) to God is opposed to an oath to government in abuse of God’s name. A pledge to fiction is a blasphemy to God, a rejection of Reality and embracing of the artifice of legal, adversarial (satanic) things. The bullshit spouted by the corporate church prevents us from contemplating this notions as anything other than religious gobbilygook, and yet these tenants are the very foundation of the law. The deception is respectably complete, for the actions of a religious man are mistaken for the false show of a scripturally ignorant member of a legally incorporated religion. Our law can never be both legal and spiritual, for these laws are purposefully opposed to one another, just as our actual Being in True religion can never be based on any of the false doctrines of corporations in name only. For as with any other source, the Bible is completely ignored in all legal settings, including so-called “Christian” churches. No man in his right mind and with due diligence of the scriptures would lay a hand on any form of money, would ever attend or claim membership to any state or religion by any name, and would never accept these magistrates (gods) and archons such as the pope, the kings and queens, and the presidents of municipal corporations such as Washington D.C. as their law-makers.

RELIGIOUS MEN – Such as entered into some monastery or convent. In old English deeds, the vendee was often restrained from aliening to “Jews or religious men” lest the lands should fall into mortmain (dead hands). Religious men were CIVILLY DEAD(Black1)

RELIGIOUS USE – See CHARITABLE USES(Black1)

—=—

What is the cure for money and debt to mammon? Pure and utter charity. The doing of all things without valuation, without credit or debt, and without expectation of anything in return for our actions. This is the opposing force, the absolute Love that must always be the goal of all our actions. This is the basis of the moral, scriptural law. This is the choice we must choose, for all other roads lead to Rome. This is the best example of self-evident Truth. It can only be denied if we respect and fear fiction over Reality.

And yet here we are, stuck in the middle of financial tyranny that can only exist if men have faith in the existence and valuation of money, the god of mammon. We have accepted the artifice as Real and denied the God of Nature. We have denied Reality and placed monetary value on everything Real, including our Selves. And this is the true definition of evil, its root being the false-valuation of Life itself as something that can be conquered (purchased) by money. For mammon is not money, money is only a tool thereof. The true evil is valuation, the estimation and consideration of all things not by their priceless Nature but by its price in fiat currency and debt (the lie that is “credit”). We no longer act as men but as false, legal personas. Slaves.

Though all things can be valued in money, money is valued in nothing at all. To call this as the greatest lie of that which is satanic (adversarial) to God and Nature is the understatement of the age. And the pope now wishes to protect that system of the adversarial from “laundering” and “terrorism.” In other words, the cheats that are the controllers of money, the pirates that use money as the tool for contractual enslavement of all peoples and nations, are protected by that highest fraud of organized (universal) “Christian” religion. For a world government must be based on a world currency, and a world government cannot exist unless it is married (justified) by a global church. They must be married, but the also must be separated. But separation is not annulment, but a legally binding contract of both parties. What is separate is still married. And the separation of church and state is only the separation of moral and civil (legal) law, so that the church has no power over the state, but still lies in marriage with its actions and in justification of its crimes against man, Nature, and God. Do not be fooled by this Masonic treatise of separation of church and state, for the slave-master cannot afford to be bound by the moral, scriptural law when acting commercially in his holding of slaves. His power relies upon the false doctrines of his created corporate religion, and his law over men depends solely on those men not under-standing the scriptural law of the Bible as the very foundation of the common law.

—=—

We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge, or gallantry, would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a netOur Constitution was made only for a moral and religious peopleIt is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”

—John Adams (The Works of John Adams, ed. C. F. Adams, Boston: Little, Brown Co., 1851, 4:31)

—=—

Most public-minded fools educated in public places and indoctrinated with the public law of the usurious gods of congress and their magistrates in judicial seats at Bar would view this quote by one of the corporate founders of the United States as purely religious drivel. And yet this is the very foundation of law. For the Bible is indeed the foundation of the moral law as part of the unwritten common law. We either follow it by following the teachings and footsteps of christ in action and in works or we follow that which is opposed to it, bearing the false symbol of a cross while worshiping only the legal system of the controllers of mammon. There is no other law, for all aspects of the law begin with this foundational choice. And so we have been convinced that what we see as the corporate religions of the state are the only choice we have if we wish to practice our religious works. We have been taught to associate the church with the Bible, which could not be any more opposite. For when the words of the scriptures are translated by the priest-class to justify the legal incorporation of that church and the legal, licensed, flattering title of the priest, in no way can the true intention of the scriptures be taught genuinely by the false prophet, for-profit “priest.” The intent of the professor of that corporate religion must support its doctrine over that of the actual scriptures, just as the state pretends to be a “Christian” nation, using that term as merely a flattering title among its own created wasteland of legalism.

As the scriptures state, the True church is not a building created by the hands of men, but is the men who together follow the religious practices of the moral law by the example of christ. This is True religion. All else is merely the work of Masonry, of buildings constructed by the hands of men and made to be more “sacred” than the scriptures and the men who would follow them. But that which is artificial and held sacred is actually the opposite. Sacred means cursed, for all fiction is a curse when held above Nature and without self-evidence. The True followers of christ were fed to the lions by Caesar, remember? For no law of man could control them. Their existence was of the Pure self-evidence of the Highest Law.

We, however, contently sit in the stands of the colosseum, modernly recreated into the cushy couch in front of our big-screen televisions connected in a grid of false information and artificial intelligence, watching with a feeling of exhilaration or pretended helplessness as Caesar’s pets.

So what is this modern Caesar’s goals with this global network of Financial Information Authorities?

For a fair notion of this, let us see just what this Egmont Group is.

—=—

About the Egmont Group

Recognizing the importance of international cooperation in the fight against money laundering and financing of terrorism, a group of Financial Intelligence Units (FIUs) met at the Egmont Arenberg Palace in Brussels, Belgium, and decided to establish an informal network of FIUs for the stimulation of international co-operation. Now known as the Egmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units, Egmont Group FIUs meet regularly to find ways to promote the development of FIUs and to cooperate, especially in the areas of information exchange, training and the sharing of expertise.

Link–> http://www.egmontgroup.org

—=—

The Egmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units

About:

Recognizing the importance of international cooperation in the fight against money laundering and financing of terrorism, a group of Financial Intelligence Units (FIUsmet at the Egmont Arenberg Palace in BrusselsBelgium, and decided to establish an informal network of FIUs for the stimulation of international co-operation. Now known as the Egmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units, Egmont Group FIUs meet regularly to find ways to promote the development of FIUs and to cooperate, especially in the areas of information exchangetraining and the sharing of expertise.

The Egmont Group has evolved over the years and is currently (2015comprised of 151 member FIUs. The 2012 FATF Recommendations expect that FIUs apply for membership with the Egmont Group, therefore, the Egmont network of FIUs is expected to grow even further in the coming years.

After over 15 successful years of the Egmont Group, and with the publication of the revised FATF 40 Recommendations in 2012, it was necessary to amend the governing documents of the organization. The Charter Review Project team has produced a complimentary set of documents, which are interlinked and reference relevant FATF Recommendations. The revised Egmont Charter (2013)Egmont Principles for Information Exchange and Operational Guidance for FIUs provide the foundation for the future work of the Egmont Group and contribute to greater international cooperation and information exchange between FIUs.

The goal of the Egmont Group is to provide a forum for FIUs around the world to improve cooperation in the fight against money laundering and the financing of terrorism and to foster the implementation of domestic programs in this field. This support includes:

  • Expanding and systematizing international cooperation in the reciprocal exchange of information;
  • Increasing the effectiveness of FIUs by offering training and promoting personnel exchanges to improve the expertise and capabilities of personnel employed by FIUs;
  • Fostering better and secure communication among FIUs through the application of technology, such as the Egmont Secure Web (ESW);
  • Fostering increased coordination and support among the operational divisions of member FIUs;
  • Promoting the operational autonomy of FIUs; and
  • Promoting the establishment of FIUs in conjunction with jurisdictions with an AML/CFT program in place, or in areas with a program in the early stages of development.

Link–> http://www.egmontgroup.org/international-organizations

—=—

This is akin to the notion of United Nations “peacekeeping” forces, another way of saying a global army that beats down nations and people when they don’t wish to cooperate in this globalist banking cartel organized internationally under the Pope (universal church) and United Nations (universal state). While in a prima facie way (on the face of it without further evidence) this sounds like a good thing, we cannot forget that this is mammon. This is what enslaves us all, both individuals (in person) and through the particular nation and jurisdiction we in nativity (captivity) within. And so billions starve so that money can be hoarded and invested.

Globalism is not what we think it is, and will not be accomplished how we keep expecting it to. Our public-mindedness gets in the way of out discernment of evil, for we live in the midst of the designs of evil in artifice. Globalism is not government, but governance. The difference is that governments are separate, while governance is universal. At this point in time, while we still play the game of thrones of nations, pretending their borders tangibly exist in Nature and also that we are somehow a part of them, global governance is being more and more universally cast about each nation to create that one, united body politic. The standards and practices put forward by countless private associations such as the International Bar Association (to which all other national Bar associations are members), Codex Alimentarius Commission (a body that was established in early November 1961 by the Food and Drug Administration of the United Nations (FAO), the World Health Organization (WHO), and the Government Accounting Standars Board (GASB) to which all government financial statements (audits) are slowly being made beholden to, we find that all individual governments of nations are being governed by these private, non-governmental agencies and associations, commonly called non-governmental organizations of NGO’s. And so while the nations will continue to appear to be sovereign in their legal capacity, and while the private landholders of each State of the nations and countries will certainly retain such sovereignty, the notions they created are all being happily made to conform to these outside influences, best practices, initiatives, declarations, and other forms of corporate governance that are essentially creating one giant corporation of ignorant plebes that love their enslavement.

—=—

The real hopeless victims of mental illness are to be found among those who appear to be most normal Many of them are normal because they are so well adjusted to our mode of existence, because their human voice has been silenced so early in their livesthat they do not even struggle or suffer or develop symptoms as the neurotic doesThey are normal not in what may be called the absolute sense of the wordthey are normal only in relation to a profoundly abnormal society. Their perfect adjustment to that abnormal society is a measure of their mental sicknessThese millions of abnormally normal peopleliving without fuss in a society to whichif they were fully human beingsthey ought not to be adjusted.

―Aldous Huxley, Brave New World Revisited

—=—

The mass of illiterates will certainly adjust, for without such an adjustment, without taking the mark of this collective machine as its beast, they will not be able to participate in the cashless society being set up as we speak. Their phones will not work. Their connection to the A.I. will be shut off. Their property will be sexed by its rightful owner, the owner of their legal person (status). Their worthless lives will be more valuable than Life Itself. They will beg to be part of this global structure of the artifice of mammon.

A glanse at the listed partnerships of this Egmont Group tells a tale of its own, and let’s us know what the pope and vatican truly support.

The following organizations are linked to their perspective websites…

—=—

International Partner Orgs

International Partners

—=—

Guilt by association? Really think this is a fallacious comparison?

At this point, I am not sure I can provide anything more as to what is happening right now all around you. You either choose to see the self-evidence of what this is or you continue to suffer it. I hold little hope of any future but the more organized hell of nations united into a more fluid version of we have become accustomed to. I have little faith in the zombie public that they may ever wake themselves up by abandoning their false truths in acceptance of the pain and anguish that Reality will deal to their artificial lives and collections of insured stuff. But I look forward to some future day when those of us who can see and accept the harshest and most beautiful parts of Reality  for what they Truly are, and live together in that remnant. And I look with sadness at what I know is to come, as this false enlightenment of false religion and law overcomes even the most ardent of strongholds as technology (artifice) causes the best of moral men to succumb to the temptations and inducements of mammon.

—=—

There’s nothing in the world so demoralizing as money.” 

―Sophocles, Antigone

—=—

“All men make mistakes, but a good man yields when he knows his course is wrong, and repairs the evil. The only crime is pride.” 

―Sophocles, Antigone

—=—

It is ironic that as I uncover and speak the Truth in its self-evidence evermore clearly that I am offered less and less airtime for interviews on the radio. It appears that the “truth” movement is quite unwilling to hear about its name-sake, and the imaginations of men have thrust us all into a hopeless delusion. And so I leave you with this, the parabolic predictions of the scriptures.

—=—

“And for this cause God shall send them strong delusionthat they should believe a lieThat they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.”

—2 Timothy 2: 11-12, KJB

—=—

And he causeth all, both small and greatrich and poorfree and bond, to receive a mark… And that no man might BUY OR SELLsave he that had the markor the name of the beastor the number of his name.”

—Revelation 13: 16-17, KJB

—=—

Now we might finally see what these two oft-quoted but totally misunderstood verses actually mean. For this word “his” as used in reference to the “number of HIS name” is actually the word autos, Strong’s #G846, which carries the meaning of a personal pronoun of the third person, of the false self, the legal strawman. All the names of Caesar’s realm are registered with numbers, and the number of the name referenced here is indeed the legal persona we pretend to be in agency. We are caused to be beasts of burden in lading, and very soon we will not be able to participate in this system of mammon without that social security number of our name, as managed by the International Social  Security Association (ISSA) of the United Nations. This was not some monster or creature from any etherial real or island, this is our own agentic, fictional, legal persona. This is a parable about exactly what is happing today, the voluntary surrender of God’s authority and the unalienable rights so-called that exist only in that realm of Reality and Nature.

The less popular verse that the frar-mongorers seem to forget to share is this one, for there can be a happy ending for those who do not sit and wait for some supernatural (above Nature) false god to return and save them, for those who realize that the teachings of christ were a do-it-yourself instruction manual for the spiritual man.

—=—

“And I saw as it were a sea of glass mingled with fire: and them that had gotten the victory over the beast, and over his image, and over his markand over the number of his name, stand on the sea off glass, having the harps of God.”

–Revelation 15:2, KJB

—=—

The word “harp,” as Strong’s #G2788 – kithara – has only the metaphorically meaning of “the music of the Bible, to which the praises of God are sung in heaven.” In other words, those following the Word (Law) of God, this word “Word” as capitalized meaning the “Son” of God as the only spiritual example, and who fear only what will happen if that Highest Law is not followed, these are the remainder; the remnant. The word harp is not a noun but a verb, an action, a song (hymn) not only sung but followed in action.

If you want to know more, if you truly seek the meanings of these things through the sourced and often ancient intention of the origin of the words used, please acquire my voluminous works to be posted soon for free at StrawmanStory.info. Though and original work, this has been but a small, general overview of that larger project, and whatever questions are left unanswered here are covered in triplicate in that work. I will announce on this blog when Volume One that work is complete and posted free for download only at the website listed above. And please know that this work is absolutely meant to be freely shared, not for-profit and gain, nor for usurious purposes, not to be employed in commerce, but to share this not-so-hidden knowledge that has been kept a mystery from us in plain sight throughout the ages. Play it forward…

My latest interview on the subject of the false perceptions of the federal reserve can be found here (caution – wordy dirds used):

Link–> https://corporationnationradioarchives.wordpress.com/2016/05/08/clint-patrick-join-the-shali-lama/

—=—

Please note that this post has been self-edited on the spot, and so any mistakes the reader may have found are certainly welcome to be shared. Please leave corrections in separate comments that can be deleted, and not mixed with normal comments. And dare I ask for sources by any contrarians? Thanks.

.

–Clint Richardson (Realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Tuesday, May 10th, 2016

Crash: Why America Will Fall Under Its Own Shadow


As a deep researcher into what is jokingly called the economy, I am getting real tired of “economists” and their dyer warnings of eminent monetary failure and thus the collapse of the so-called U.S. “economy.” I am not an economist. In truth, anyone who claims to be one is quite frankly full of shit.

So why did I title this rant as such?

First of all, let’s dispel the fallacy that the United States needs currency to rule. The United States is a military dictatorship, a fact that I will be proving beyond any doubt in my upcoming documentary film in 2015, God willing. It is ridiculous to then consider that the United States is propped up merely by money, especially when it creates that money magically through appropriation without providing new collateral. In reality, the fiat currency is nothing more or less than debt. It is promises to pay that will never be paid, for no debt can ever be paid with debt. The United States is a bankrupt corporation, as James Trafficant stated in congressional record, and a bankrupt cannot create anything but more debt.

As stupid humans, we are trained and conditioned to believe that the dollar represents something tangible with a somehow intrinsic value. I assure you it does not. But if my word isn’t good enough for you in all of your religious fervent belief and faith for said notes of mammon, let’s hear straight from the horses mouth.

The Federal Reserve, in its publication Modern Money Mechanics, states the following:

While currency is used for a great variety of small transactions, most of the dollar amount of money payments in our economy are made by check or by electronic transfer between deposit accounts. Moreover, currency is a relatively small part of the money stock.

In the United States neither paper currency nor deposits have value as commodities. Intrinsically, a dollar bill is just a piece of paper, deposits merely book entries. Coins do have some intrinsic value as metal, but generally far less than their face value.

What, then, makes these instruments – checks, paper money, and coins – acceptable at face value in payment of all debts and for other monetary uses? Mainly, it is the confidence people have that they will be able to exchange such money for other financial assets and for real goods and services whenever they choose to do so.

Who Creates Money?

Changes in the quantity of money may originate with actions of the Federal Reserve System (the central bank), depository institutions (principally commercial banks), or the public. The major control, however, rests with the central bank.

The actual process of money creation takes place primarily in banks.’ As noted earlier, checkable liabilities of banks are money. These liabilities are customers’ accounts. They increase when customers deposit currency and checks and when the proceeds of loans made by the banks are credited to borrowers’ accounts.

In the absence of legal reserve requirements, banks can build up deposits by increasing loans and investments so long as they keep enough currency on hand to redeem whatever amounts the holders of deposits want to convert into currency. This unique attribute of the banking business was discovered many centuries ago.

It started with goldsmiths. As early bankers, they initially provided safekeeping services, making a profit from vault storage fees for gold and coins deposited with them. People would redeem their “deposit receipts” whenever they needed gold or coins to purchase something, and physically take the gold or coins to the seller who, in turn, would deposit them for safekeeping, often with the same banker. Everyone soon found that it was a lot easier simply to use the deposit receipts directly as a means of payment. These receipts, which became known as notes, were acceptable as money since whoever held them could go to the banker and exchange them for metallic money.

Then, bankers discovered that they could make loans merely by giving their promises to pay, or bank notes, to borrowers. In this way, banks began to create money. More notes could be issued than the gold and coin on hand because only a portion of the notes outstanding would be presented for payment at any one time. Enough metallic money had to be kept on hand, of course, to redeem whatever volume of notes was presented for payment.

Transaction deposits are the modem counterpart of bank notes. It was a small step from printing notes to making book entries crediting deposits of borrowers, which the borrowers in turn could “spend” by writing checks, thereby “printing” their own money.”

–=–

Can you see past the illusion?

Do you see that the so-called debt doesn’t actually represent anything at all in reality?

Do you understand that debt is the basis of all religion, and that your belief and fear in it is all that substantiates it?

When this system of monetized fakery was created, its goal was not to create wealth. For money is not wealth, it is the opposite of wealth. It is debt. It must be traded in exchange for wealth to fools. If an entire nation and planet of people can be made to believe that this debt is actually a credit, then the debt can be traded for actual wealth. In other words, an entire people can somehow be made to believe that everything in reality can be traded for merely a promise to pay, and that this promise to pay is the same as the payment itself.

As Whimpy perpetually says, we will be paid Tuesday for a hamburger today… but Tuesday never comes.

As I have shown in triplicate, government has done just that. It has created the currency, traded it for corporate stocks, foreign currencies, real estate, precious metals, and anything else representative of real wealth to the point that, as Walter Burien claims via the Comprehensive Annual Financial Reporting (CAFR) system of government accounting: “Government owns it all through investment.”

–=–
Why America Is No Longer Needed
–=–

Rome is not stationary. It’s empire extends to every corner of the globe, and its center continuously relocates itself. Its name changes as its fraud is re-discovered, re-establishing itself as the need arises. And this is when the crash comes – the revolutions of past empires.

But revolution means to revolve back to the beginning; to start over again. Same empire, different name. This is why so many movies and other media is predictively programming us to support such revolutionary dissonance. Our ideas are very seldom our own, and obviously neither are our ideals of morals and values. Entertainment enters and holds our minds in whatever political thought processes the military ruler wishes to bore into its subjects. As a former Hollywood sound guy, I have seen the script-changes ensuring favorable praise and pro-government propaganda first hand, to the chagrin of writers that are paid more “money” to cooperate or else get their projects shelved.

In other words, we literally sell our souls for debt. We worship it. We trade assets for promises to pay. And we even hoard the debt notes in the illusion of security, as if debt equals safety. Unfortunately, our unreasonable belief and faith in this debt money (the devil’s currency) has lead us to covet the very thing that is killing us slowly. We therefore defend these promises to pay even to the point of war and violent oppression of the entire planet, giving blind and unwavering support to our dictators in congress and in the militarized Executive branch to kill in our (the people’s) name for the protection of our own disease of debt in its world domination.

But things are about to change…

The world is completely taken over. Almost every sense of resistance to the United Nations and what is deemed the “New World Order” by every president in recent memory has been squelched and replaced with “friendly” regimes. It is now common practice for the United States to arm both sides of every conflict while training “peace-keepers” to take over when the U.S. military withdraws from its illegal occupation in undeclared war, usually via Executive Order or other Executive (forceful) violence.

The fall of Iran seems to be the last great international challenge. Iran stands as the last hold out. And it is more demonized with every passing day.

Russia, China, and other imaginary enemies fill up the interim, but don’t be fooled. Government investments in China are why China is any power at all. And Russia wasn’t just allowed to build up its infrastructure because the United States was asleep. U.S. bases are in every state and in every nation around the world. These are not peaceful settlements, they are military occupations. No money is needed. It is rule by force, not by economics!

But with all of this military might, how is it that the U.S. will “crash?”

In the art of war, the assassin must be killed once its job is done. The United States has all but served its purpose. It has assassinated all resistance. It’s culture (which is a lack of established culture and moral law) has been infused with most other nations. Its fake currency has bought up the world “economy,” and that wealth can easily be transferred out to the world bank, leaving the people of America hopelessly destitute. With trained peace-keepers keeping the violent peace under United Nations’ purview, the centralization of military power can now be unilaterally acquired by the U.N. The United States as a mere member state of the United Nations can and is being equalized with all others.

The necessary symbolic crash of the United States central bank and currency is absolutely a requirement for global governance, where all nations are equal as the states of this United States are pretended to be. The centralized power as military force of the United States must be dismantled for the Roman phoenix to rise in its new form of global governance. And the only way to accomplish such a seemingly impossible feat is to play the only card left in the deck – the illusion of economic collapse through the “crash” of the fake currency.

Only if the people believe in that currency as real and intrinsic can this be accomplished, just as the Federal Reserve reports above.

Why is the mainstream news now sound-biting the horrors of the Fed and propagandizing the notion of “End The Fed” as a rallying cry? Does that really make sense considering that government is the majority stock-holder of all media agencies and stocks them with Operation Mockingbird parrots of the CIA, even while it saber-raddles for the destruction of Iran? Why is the totally controlled news constantly injecting fear-porn into the general public about the eminent financial crash of America? Why is it selling gold and storable food while continuously warning about earthquakes, economic upheaval, world war, and emergency preparedness?

The answers should be obvious.

The United States has done its job; its drugged, dumbed-down population used as cannon fodder as paid mercenaries for the military corporation. The borders are open. It’s business globalized. It’s independence subverted.

The shadow of America is the corporation 10 miles square called the United States corporation. And the 50 individual states that we romantically call “America” have fallen prey to their own so-called central government, where the ten planks of the Communist Manifesto are indeed the verifiable written law. The shadow of forced unionization has destroyed an unwitting people that have no idea they are proclaimed as enemies of their own central foreign state, that their shadow military occupies each of the 50 states under Leiber Code statutes, and most importantly that their currency is and always has been nothing but debt obligation and enslavement – the land of the free subjects; a cruel joke played out through an un-winnable game of monopoly at gunpoint.

The reality is that the national debt (a negative) can be abolished and jubilee’d tomorrow with the swipe of a presidential or congressional pen. It doesn’t exist in nature. It is born and will die on legal paper. But its power of illusion is so strong that the fiction of government and its fake money will cause reality to crumble right along with it. The gambling house called the stock market may crash into obscurity, but the ownership in international corporations will remain as the real wealth is transferred away. For a stock’s value is meaningless because what it is valued in is worthless debt in the form of promises to pay. It is the ownership that is important, representing controlling stake in all corporations despite what debt currency it is monetized and valued in. For all currencies are merely debt.

There are no banks left, for there is no lawful (real) money left to be banked. Deposit institutions are not banks, they are debt brokers. If you don’t understand this, then go try and deposit a gold bar or coin into “Wells Fargo Bank” or “Bank of America” – banks in name only. You cannot. No reality allowed. You can only rent a box to safely deposit your tangible property and hope it isn’t confiscated like in the last so-called “banking emergency.” Checking accounts only house promises to pay and nothing else.

The shadow government is killing its creator.

And belief in its own declared, de facto, prima facie evidence of legitimacy is all it will take to deliver the final blow.

It will be our own sons and daughters as career mercenaries that will be our own peace-keepers at home. Their uni-forms already bear the United Nations regalia and patch-mark.

.

–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Sunday, December 21th, 2014

It’s Time To Withdraw Your Membership To The United States!


Citizenship SchoolIf you are a member of an organization that begins to do things you don’t like, the rational course of action would be to withdraw your financial support to that organization and cease to be a member.

If your bank misbehaves or charges you ridiculous extra fees just because it can according to your “agreement” with the bank, the rational course of action would be to withdraw your financial support and cease to be a customer.

If your insurance coverage starts to diminish in quality or denies you your due benefits or coverage when you need it, the rational course of action would be to withdraw your financial support to that company and cease to be a member.

If my doctor or hospital began to practice bad medicine and cause more illness than it cured, the rational course of action would be to withdraw financial support to that hospital or doctor and cease to be a customer, and perhaps pursue alternative healing.

In fact, when we consider this repetitive logic, wouldn’t anyone be hard-pressed to think of any thing that might mistreat us as a member or customer that would not warrant the withdraw of financial support and termination of contract or membership?

So why then are people still voluntary members of the United States central government?

Do they enjoy the thought of future bad healthcare – which is really the quite unlawful forced commerce with insurance companies and not actual healthcare? If their membership to a corporation that gives them “benefits” suddenly forces them to accept bad medicine and bad insurance, isn’t the simple solution to end their membership to the main corporation?

Do the people enjoy paying taxes and unjust extortion fees and taxes for non-crimes just so that government can invest that money for itself without offering any benefit back to the people? Would it not be prudent to end that kind of business “relationship” with such a bad business?

Do people really believe that the meager benefit of “old-age insurance” called social security (socialism) is worth the vast amount of legal restrictions and tyrannies set forth upon them through their entire life – even when they could have invested their own money and walked away with double or triple what this administration will ever pay them – should they actually live through Obama-care? Do the people even know that there is no actual trust in their name – just a large investment fund that has been completely tapped for the national debt with no legal requirement to ever pay them anything? Do they know the difference between investing for themselves and their future and contributing (giving away) their hard-earned money to government? Do they realize where their money goes as government invests it into war, Monsanto, pharmaceuticals, and Think tanks?

Is there some misconception that being a “citizen” is somehow patriotic – that withdrawing their citizenship (membership) will make them less “American”?

Really? Because last time I checked, it was called the United States of America, not America of the United States.

Was there created at some point in history the fallacy that America is the central government called the United States – a 10 mile square municipal corporation that is not even one of the actual 50 states in the “union” ? Do the people actually believe that America is the United States?

Perhaps that misconception derives from the misunderstanding of just what citizenship is.

For citizenship is simply a membership, be it voluntary or forced through coercion and martial law, unilaterally agreed to by an individual. It is no different than a gym membership; where you must follow the rules set out in your agreement contract that only you sign. Like the government, the gym does not sign your contract. It is simply an agreement for membership to enjoy some benefits, as well as an agreement for you to follow their rules.

But what happens when the rules change without your consent?

What happens when the benefits diminish?

For instance, each state is a member of the Untied States, forced to hand over their unappropriated lands to the United States and draft new State constitutions after the Civil War under “reconstruction” and after agreeing to the terms of uniform “enabling acts” under duress. In fact, the civil war was nothing but a military takeover by a defunct central government under martial law of the lawfully succeeded sovereign states. They were forced back into contract membership with the new central government, one that was unlawfully created absent of the lawful participation of these states’ lawful congressmen. In their stead, military martial officers of law were forced into congress to replace the lawfully elected congressmen of each state. And under duress and at gunpoint, these states became members of this municipal corporation in Washington D.C, eventually dividing the entire territory of America into counties within states.

COUNTY. A district into which a state is divided.

2. The United States are generally divided into counties; counties are divided into townships or towns…

4. In some states, as Illinois; 1 Breese, R. 115; a county is considered as a corporation, in others it is only a quasi corporation.

5. In the English law this word signifies the same as shire, county being derived from the French and shire from the Saxon. Both these words signify a circuit or portion of the realm, into which the whole land is divided, for the better government thereof, and the more easy administration of justice. There is no part of England that is not within some county, and the shire-reve, (sheriff) originally a yearly officer, was the governor of the county. Four of the counties of England, viz. Lancaster, Chester, Durham and Ely, were called counties Palatine, which were jurisdictions of a peculiar nature, and held by, especial charter from the king. See stat. 27 H. VIII. c.25.

COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. Certain officers generally entrusted with the superintendence of the collection of the county taxes, and the disbursements made for the county. They are administrative officers, invested by the local laws with various powers.

***All legal definitions taken from Bouvier’s Law Dictioanry, 1856

Counties are nothing but municipal corporations; a network grid of contract issuers and enforcers for the United States government – acting under administrate local law with federal powers. Another word for administrative is contract. And all administrative law is simply the administration of the unilateral contractual relationship with you and government. The county has police officers. The gym has security guards. There is no difference. Police officers are just security guards for the county corporation. They’re authority is presumed, just as your citizenship that might grant them contractual authority over you is presumed.

UNILATERAL CONTRACT, civil law. When the party to whom an engagement is made, makes no express agreement on his part, the contract is called uni-lateral, even in cases where the law attaches certain obligations to his acceptance… A loan of money, and a loan for use, are of this kind.

One does not generally think of government as just another customer-based corporation, but this is exactly what it is. When signing a unilateral agreement (contract), one agrees to follow a certain set of de facto corporate rules and regulations (codes) as set out by government. This is the voluntary state of citizenship – a series of unilateral contractual agreements signed or unsigned (presumption of law) by the people of America.

This circumstance of multiple contractual obligations is often called the STRAWMAN, which is simply the “person” as defined and bound by these contracts. The “person” is artificial, as defined in US Code and the 14th Amendment (see below). The person is a corporate veil of the man, used for the purposes of contracts. And in administrative law, government can only contract with this artificial person. Government cannot regulate man, only the corporate person. Thus, administrative law has nothing to do with and no authority over living man, unless he or she is acting under the commercial activities described within their contractual relationship with government.

A driver’s license, for instance, is a unilateral contractual agreement by one man to follow the State government’s vehicle code, which is administrative law. Driving is administratively speaking a commercial activity. Thus, driving can be regulated by government… but only if the man agrees to become a commercial person while utilizing his automobile. He does this when he unilaterally agrees for no reason at all to agree with government that he is utilizing his car as a commercial “vehicle”, even when dropping the kids off at school. Even if that car is never used for any purpose in commerce pr commercial activities, the government still elicits people to obtain a commercial license to drive.

You see, this is the only way that government can have authority over you. It must trick you into entering into some agreement and contract for which you give your consent to its authority. Without this unilateral agreement, government cannot rule you and regulate every part of your life. It must convince you that the activities you participate in are within its authority as a legal activity before it can tell you they are illegal. And it must lie to you so as to convince you that using your car to travel is illegal unless you have a license to do so. For a license is nothing more than permission from government to do something illegal. In other words, every time you get into your vehicle and drive you are breaking the law by permission.

Though traveling in your personal automobile is not unlawful, driving commercially without a license is illegal – a breach of contract.

Perhaps most ironic about all of this is the simple realization that all of this contractual relationship nonsense is based on one and only one thing – your membership with the United States corporation in Washington D.C. This is the central hub of information. It is where your official artificial person is stored and maintains residence. And states and counties are just subdivisions of that corporation – artificial borders signifying United States jurisdiction, assigned federal locator codes called ZIP codes that are property of the United States. For the U.S. Postal Service is part of the United States corporation in Washington D.C. Your United States mail is not delivered to your home, it is delivered to your commercial address within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.

You must never forget that all of your commercial activities are being done inside of the United States jurisdiction – the artificial corporate veil that extends throughout the 50 states and beyond like a spider web, ensnaring the activities people like flies and spinning them into commercial persons.

Imagine in your mind that the entire land of America has a plastic coating over it for which all people walk upon as corporate persons and citizens of the United States, never really comprehending that this clear plastic coating of corporate person-hood separates their natural body from the natural land. The people walk and talk on this corporate veil of clear plastic as if it doesn’t exist and as if they are walking on the actual land – which ironically is a true statement. For corporatism is indeed artificial, just as the artificial person replaces the man in his or her transactions with the corporation government, so to does the United States replace the land of America with its veil of artificial person-hood called statutes and codes.

Yet just on the other side of this artificial construct lies the natural world, natural law, and all of the natural rights that existed before the people contractually agreed to give them up for government granted political rights. For tyranny and oppression is literally the contractual right of citizens of the United States.

For a deeper understanding of what a right actually is (and this reality will certainly surprise you), please take the time to study my expose’ here:

Link–> https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2013/02/19/tyranny-requires-equality/

Perhaps this love affair with citizenship stems from the fallacious belief that the United States is still the same old sovereign county it was when it was founded, before the civil war tore it apart and the defunct and unlawful United States glued it back together with legal tape and military oppression?

Well, I’ve got some bad news for you folks…

The United States is now a member of the United Nations… and the United States is referred to as a “sovereign state” by that international central government. Just like the states under contractual membership with the United States corporation in Washington D.C. are not referred to as “countries”, the 193 countries of the world under membership of the United Nations corporation are also not called “countries”. And it is not the people or the 50 states that are members of the United Nations, it is just this 10 mile square piece of land called the United States corporation that is a member.

So can a sovereign individual state be a member of such a central government and still be sovereign? And can a sovereign nation then still be sovereign as a member of an international government under international maritime and admiralty (military) law?

The United Nations doctrine for “statehood” rings familiar, sounding very much like the false paradigm of the rules of “statehood” for the 50 states in the United States of America:

The dominant customary international law standard of statehood is the declarative theory of statehood that defines the state as a person of international law if it “possess the following qualifications: (a) a permanent population; (b) a defined territory; (c) government; and (d) capacity to enter into relations with the other states.” Debate exists on the degree to which recognition should be included as a criterion of statehood. The declarative theory of statehood, an example of which can be found in the Montevideo Convention, argues that statehood is purely objective and recognition of a state by other states is irrelevant. On the other end of the spectrum, the constitutive theory of statehood defines a state as a person under international law only if it is recognized as sovereign by other states. For the purposes of this list, included are all states that either:

  • (a) have declared independence and are often regarded as having control over a permanently populated territory

or

  • (b) are recognised as a sovereign state by at least one other sovereign state

Link–> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sovereign_states

The word-magic here involves the concept that the “state” has “declared independence” and has “control over a permanently populated area”.

This is of course the United States. It, as a central incorporated government, has declared independence that no one dare challenge due to its military might. The once sovereign states now pledged as collateral for this corporation, its debts, and its “good faith and credit” are considered nothing but legal territories of the United States in the legal realm through this contractual and constitutional relationship. The governments of the individual state territories of the United States are still military in nature, each one occupied by the United States’ military and its bases, which under the Libor Code represents military rule.

In other words, the presence of a military base in your State is stated in law to signify military rule under martial law. These bases are not just for your protection, they are for your control. They are the occupying forces of the United States, left over from the same forces that occupied each State during the Civil War. They are the United States corporation’s military – the military of Washington D.C. –  not the American or state militia. They protect the United States from all threats both foreign and domestic, and that includes the people of America and the 50 states. The military ensures the continuity of this 10 mile square municipal corporation and its military rule over the 50 states and other insular possessions. The United States is legally in possession of us!

And each state is governed militarily by a “governor”, whom in Canada is referred to as “Governor General”, and who is the ex officio Commander-in-Chief of the State National Guard of His State unless called in total by the President as (CIC) of the United States. This military position of Governor as commander of a military force is followed by a whole list of military positions…

Lieutenant Governor
Attorney General
Solicitor General
Insurance Commissioner – i.e. military commissions
Superintendents – The commanding officer of the United States Military Academy is its Superintendent.
State Controller
Officers of the court
Police Officers
Employees of Commissions and Authorities

All of these titles represent rule by military force.

OFFICER. He who is lawfully invested with an office.

2. Officers may be classed into, 1. Executive; as the president of the United States of America, the several governors of the different states. Their duties are pointed out in the national constitution, and the constitutions of the several states, but they are required mainly to cause the laws to be executed and obeyed.

3. – 2. The legislative; such as members of congress; and of the several state legislatures. These officers are confined in their duties by the constitution, generally to make laws, though sometimes in cases of impeachment, one of the houses of the legislature exercises judicial functions, somewhat similar to those of a grand jury by presenting to the other articles of impeachment; and the other house acts as a court in trying such impeachments. The legislatures have, besides the power to inquire into the conduct of their members, judge of their elections, and the like.

OFFICE. An office is a right to exercise a public function or employment, and to take the fees and emoluments belonging to it

2. Offices may be classed into civil and military.

TAKE. This is a technical expression which signifies to be entitled to; as, a devisee will take under the will. To take also signifies to seize, as to take and carry away…

CIVIL. This word has various significations. 1. It is used in contradistinction to barbarous or savage, to indicate a state of society reduced to order and regular government; thus we speak of civil life, civil society, civil government, and civil liberty.

2. It is sometimes used in contradistinction to criminal, to indicate the private rights and remedies of men, as members of the community, in contrast to those which are public and relate to the government; thus we speak of civil process and criminal process, civil jurisdiction and criminal jurisdiction.

3. It is also used in contradistinction to military or ecclesiastical, to natural or foreign; thus we speak of a civil station, as opposed to a military or ecclesiastical station; a civil death as opposed to a natural death; a civil war as opposed to a foreign war.

So what does all this mean?

Consider for a moment just what the term “civil war” actually represents. As with the United States Civil War, we find that it was indeed fought to ensure the forced continuity of the United States government. It was not so much a war as it was an invasion. And it was fought to ensure that the people under martial law went along with that government who did not wish to.

To make the contradistinction between the words military and civil is almost a mute point. For a “civil society” under “civil law” cannot be accomplished without force of a military entity – which is the executive branch of government (now the Department Of Defense – as in defense of the realm).

For instance, the U.S. District Courts operate with no authority to actually enforce their decisions. Thus the power of the courts lie in the connection it has to the Executive Branch of that area. This is the true importance of the County Sheriff, for the Sheriff is the Executive power of all the courts within that county. The Sheriff’s Department man’s these courts (bailiffs, etc.), who operate under his authority. Of course, the Sheriff would have little power without the decisions and warrants issued by the courts. In a lawful society this would be referred to as a check and balance, creating a restraint of unreasonable power or influence by either entity. But when unlawful men occupy these offices as persons of the militarized United States under its authority and jurisdiction, the law becomes lawless and the powers of corruption go unchecked.

In essence, this relationship between the judicial and the executive is symbiotic in nature, where alone each office and officer would have no lawful power. But together they become the law, both written and enforced. The cowardly attorney’s in black robes called judges hide behind their pulpits and gavels while the Sheriff hides behind his badge and gun, while each gives authority to the other. Neither takes responsibility for their own actions, because they have been allowed to operate as artificial persons under limited liability incorporation. And they protect each other from legal action as one derives power unjustly from the other.

If lawful men took over either office, refusing to enforce the power and authority of the other, and taking responsibility for their own actions outside of the color of law, the people would have little to fear from their government. But lawful men such as these generally end up dead or imprisoned by the very entity they represent.

On the national level, the President of the United States acts as the Commander In Chief of his executive army, carrying out the legislative and judicial law presented to it. Congress, like the judicial, has no power to enforce its created statutes and codes (judicial opinions for courts) without the enforcement arm of the Executive Branch. A law or decision without force carries no weight, especially from men with no honor.

In other words, the legal system of the United States is solely based on the force and coercion of the executive government to carry out the political laws created by congress. The local and state governments operate under the authority of the United States, for they are just corporations as extensions of that federal government corporation.

Congress created the court system and the Supreme Court, which derives its authority and jurisdiction from that body politic.This is an important fact because this means that the entire system of corporate administrative courts across the country are statutory in nature – created by congress and not the constitution itself, and operating under the authority and jurisdiction of the United States corporation. To put it simply, this means that the courts are operating under private corporate law without lawful authority. That is, unless you consent to that authority as a private corporate person – a member of the United States corporation. Just like the gym example, this private law only applies to members of the United States.

This creation of the court system was done by Congress in the Judiciary Act of 1789:

–=–

The Judiciary Act of 1789

September 24, 1789.

1 Stat. 73.

CHAP. XX. – An Act to establish the Judicial Courts of the United States.

SECTION 1. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the supreme court of the United States shall consist of a chief justice and five associate justices, any four of whom shall be a quorum, and shall hold annually at the seat of government two sessions, the one commencing the first Monday of February, and the other the first Monday of August. That the associate justices shall have precedence according to the date of their commissions, or when the commissions of two or more of them bear date on the same day, according to their respective ages…

Link–> http://www.constitution.org/uslaw/judiciary_1789.htm

–=–

The authority and jurisdiction of these statutory courts only applies to citizens (members) of the United States.

Some people also refer to citizens as “employees” of the Untied States, which is not incorrect. Congressmen (representatives and senators) are also “employees” of the United States corporation, but are officially called “Members”. And we can read above that judges and justices are “commissioned” as employees.

All of these men are acting as artificial persons of the United States, for there is no natural law or natural rights under civil and administrative law because only political law exists there – abeyance by force of contract. This is the very definition of military rule. And every time a citizen does not obey the law, the militarized executive branch steps in to force either compliance, incarceration, or death.

Murder is unlawful and illegal, but government gives license to commit this illegal act – a license to kill. It is interesting to note that government only acknowledges the “civil death” of a person, not the bloody and violent taking of the life of a man.

CIVIL DEATH, persons. The change of the state of a person who is declared civilly dead by judgment of a competent tribunal. In such case, the person against whom such sentence is pronounced is considered dead.

It is interesting to note here that just as a living or natural man cannot have a civil death but only a natural one, the word “perish” does not apply to persons, as artificial persons never existed as a living things but only as contractual things in legal code:

TO PERISH. To come to an end; to cease to be; to die.

2. What has never existed cannot be said to have perished

You see, an artificial person (corporation) never actually exists in nature, so it cannot have a natural death.

So it is perhaps the best definition of civil law for me to say that:

Civil law is the state of non-necessity of martial law while under military rule, because the governed are not acting in civil disobedience.

Martial law is the physical manifestation of force and violence via government decree to ensure the continuity of military rule that is visible and obvious (violent) to all people.

And military rule is simply the current state of a system of de facto United States corporate law based on coercion, force, and occasional violence, which is sugar-coated and masked under the appearance of civility and under the guise of “civil law”.

Civil law and military rule, therefore, are all but indistinguishable. They are both systems of law enacted by forced compliance of the Executive Branch of government. In both systems, the laws they tout are ensured by force. And in both instances, a man’s natural rights are struck down in lieu of positive or political rights.

It is ironic and disturbing then to point out the now obvious paradox of a subjected people in an occupied land…

For it would only be through open revolt and total disobedience of the current laws of the United States central government that the above facts could manifest themselves as self evident. This axiom of military rule is invisible to the civil servants and citizens of government, no differently than the subjects of a king might never consider that they are at all times under military rule – the rule by force of a tyrant – no matter how fair or just that king seems to be.

This kingdom called the United States – the District that reigns the lands of America through contractual membership under force of its own law despite being a foreign corporate entity outside of those lands – holds the reigns to millions of soldiers; obedient Americans conscripted by their own enemy through contract as security guards for the United States. And these soldiers, in their belief that they are fighting for America, will no doubt blindly follow this United States corporation into oblivion no differently than did those useful fools that killed father, brother, and child in that great United States Civil War – “The War Of Northern Aggression“.

Perhaps a more fitting title to that Civil War and to all wars proceeding it would read: “The Unending War Of Continued United States Aggression, Both Foreign and Domestic“.

Now you might think that Congress is there to redress grievances of the people to the United States government as representatives thereof. But oh what a tangled web they weave…

Congressmen are “employees” of the United States government, according to TITLE 5 of U.S. CODE.

So this would be like expecting a mid-level management employee of Walmart to change the policies of Walmart’s CEO and board of directors. Employees have no individual say on what happens in the United States corporation. So a single representative is worthless without the agreement of the vast majority of the entire body of representatives.

And of course the people represented in these congressional districts never seem to realize that the business affairs of Congress only happen inside of Washington D.C. – in other words outside of their State. Just as employees of Walmart have no authority outside of the corporate jurisdiction of Walmart, neither do the congressmen and Senators have power in the 50 individual States as republics. They are the Representatives of the Federal Government to the people, not the representatives of the people to the Federal Government. They conduct only Federal business in the jurisdiction of the United States, even while doing so in the States they hold domicile. They are United States Employees, not State Employees. In fact, they have absolutely no power within the State government, except those imposed by force by the Federal Central government as a whole.

So why do the people contractually volunteer to give up their power to a bunch of known-to-be-corrupt representatives as employees of the very entity that enslaves them, instead of leaving this horrific militarized club called the United States by withdrawing legal membership?

Perhaps it is the misconception that our membership (citizenship) is not a choice.

But wait a minute, you say. Isn’t it my “constitutional right” to be a citizen?

That’s an interesting question, actually. In fact, the concept of “citizenship” as it stands today was not part of the original constitution. Citizenship was created after the “country” was placed under military rule (martial law) under the Libor Code and General Orders 100. It was in this reconstruction period after the “Civil War” that was created reconstruction amendment #14.

The 14th Amendment states:

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside…”

Whereas before this amendment was ratified by the now unlawful military congress the concept of citizenship was based on the blood of the man in question in a natural sense, the United States now took on a corporate disposition and changed the presumption of citizenship into a legally binding contractual duty; where all people became artificial persons as individual corporate bodies politic within the United States’ web of corporatism.

The most overlooked word in this amendment to the constitution is the word “subject”:

SUBJECT, contracts. The thing which is the object of an agreement. This term is used in the laws of Scotland.

SUBJECT, persons, government. An individual member of a nation, who is subject to the laws; this term is used in contradistinction to citizen, which is applied to the same individual when considering his political rights.

2. In monarchical governments, by subject is meant one who owes permanent allegiance to the monarch. Vide Body politic

NATIONALITY. The state of a person in relation to the nation in which he was born.

2. A man retains his nationality of origin during his minority, but, as in the case of his domicil of origin, he may change his nationality upon attaining full age; he cannot, however, renounce his allegiance without permission of the government. See Citizen; Domicile; Expatriation; Naturalization…

NATIONS. Nations or states are independent bodies politic; societies of men united together for the purpose of promoting their mutual safety and advantage by the joint efforts of their combined strength.

2. But every combination of men who govern themselves, independently of all others, will not be considered a nation; a body of pirates, for example, who govern themselves, are not a nation. To constitute a nation another ingredient is required. The body thus formed must respect other nations in general, and each of their members in particular. Such a society has her affairs and her interests; she deliberates and takes resolutions in common; thus becoming a moral person who possesses an understanding and will peculiar to herself, and is susceptible of obligations and rights…

3. It belongs to the government to declare whether they will consider a colony which has thrown off the yoke of the mother country as an independent state; and until the government have decided on the question, courts of justice are bound to consider the ancient state of things as remaining unchanged.

In the Civil War, it would be a foregone conclusion to state that the United States did not accept (as it was lawfully required to do via its own charter) the secession of the confederate states – the yolks that threw themselves from the mother country. Instead, it acted unlawfully by all standards of ethics and natural law – a military conquest being the result – forcing the confederate states to be captured as prisoners of war and to accept the new reorganized United States and its new corporate constitution as their new sovereign tyrant.

COUNTRY. By country is meant the state of which one is a member.

2. Every man’s country is in general the state in which he happens to have been born, though there are some exceptions. See Domicil; Inhabitant. But a man has the natural right to expatriate himself, i. e. to abandon his country, or his right of citizenship acquired by means of naturalization in any country in which he may have taken up his residence. See Allegiance; Citizen; Expatriation…

Remember, the United Nations refers to the United States as a state that is a member of the U.N, just as the United States refers to its own 50 States that are supposedly independent but members of that body.

But more importantly one must understand the distinction made here of being “born in the country of the United States”.

Though a man may be born in the State of Georgia, his residence is created within the jurisdiction of the United States – that incorporated legal boundry that extends across the entirety of the territories called “states” and beyond. In essence, when a man is born in the United States, it is his artificial person that is civilly born, creating a citizen.

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside…”

Again, this very important distinction must be made…

Though you physically are born in and reside within a State, the artificial representation of you called a legal “person” and a “citizen” is civilly born in and resides within the jurisdiction of the United States. Registered persons/citizens who vote are actually voting in the artificial representation of Washington D.C. – the jurisdiction that extends from that central district 10 miles square over the entire “country” through contract. Your home is a registered United States home. Your vehicle is a registered United States vehicle. Your children are registered United States persons. And all of these contractual agreements can be utilized to take these things away from citizens. In fact, it is the political and constitutional right of all citizens to have their registered property of the United States taken away from them. Just read the 5th Amendment very carefully… for it tells you clearly that through the United States court system under what it calls “due process”, you life, liberty, and property can be taken from you (see definition of take above).

In this way, it is correct to say that for the most part, the actual individual states are empty – abandoned by all the people who became residents of the United States in Washington D.C. – for the people all reside in the United States, and the States are territories of the United States. The people walk as persons upon the plastic coating of United States jurisdiction, never touching the natural land. Of course the illusion of States rights still exists among the citizens of the United States, who have no idea they are under the military rule of this foreign corporation, and who do not comprehend the true nature of the word person or citizen.

In the United States corporation…

Citizenship is granted, not taken;

Citizenship is legal and political, not lawful and natural;

Citizenship is contractual, not moral;

Citizenship is a voluntary membership, not a mandatory requirement.

Citizenship is artificial and un-American!!!

Perhaps the natural born citizens of the United States should be asking themselves why this so-called privilege and natural right of citizenship is being tossed to the wind and bestowed to those who did not naturally and traditionally gain it? The fact that citizenship can be contractually bestowed upon anyone who is contractually willing to receive or pay for all of the benefits and tyranny that accompanies such a legal status should be enough for anyone to realize that its conveyance has nothing to do with anything but a contractual tie to the military rule of government. This once honorable title of men is now just a corporate slogan to sell monopolized, for-profit government products and services to ignorant persons at non-competative prices.

Take the influx of what we call “illegal immigrants” as a clue as to how America became a militarized corporate slave machine:

The Pew Hispanic Center determined that according to an analysis of Census Bureau data about 8 percent of children born in the United States in 2008 — about 340,000 — were offspring of unauthorized immigrants. In total, about four million American-born children of unauthorized immigrant parents resided in this country in 2009, along with about 1.1 million foreign-born children of unauthorized immigrant parents. The Center for Immigration Studies – a think tank which favors stricter controls on immigration—claims that between 300,000 and 400,000 children are born each year to illegal immigrants in the U.S.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sovereign_states

These are “natural born” children (citizens) just like you according to your representatives in government, for citizens are no longer required to have honor to join the “country”. And soon over 11 million non-natural born invading immigrants will join the party when the United States says it’s just alright.

Citizenship means nothing to an honorable man. It is just a ticket to ride on the slave-ship. It is the act of selling ones soul to acquire artificial things. And it has become a pour substitute for a once-cherished thing. Most importantly, it does not make you an American, just a useful pawn in a collective extortion racket designed to create corporate authority by making all the people into one collective tool to extract their individual power and intent as one lone consenting voice for the actions of an unlawful corporation. And every unlawful action by government is based on the informed consent it presumes from its members.

Isn’t it time to rebut that presumption of consent and take back our individual voices and power as individual men?

So let’s say that you are a member of an exclusive golf club that only allows people just like you to enter. You retain a membership to this club because you wish to be a part of something special and be around like-minded individuals who contribute and benefit from this club and its rules and regulations, as well as its exclusivity and respect. And you stay a member because this club operates legitimately and lawfully with full respect to nature and to all involved.

But then let’s say that your club is taken over and its rules for membership changed.

Suddenly, this club is full of men, women and children (persons) who are not like-minded in any way and who do not respect in any way your methods, opinions, lifestyle, morals, ethics, values, and so on. And then the club management passes rules and regulations that require you to integrate, hire as employees, and tolerate all of these new members – lest you be fined and imprisoned for discrimination and your corporation terminated and its assets seized by government. (Note: This is what E-Verify does.)

Would not the proper response be to immediately end your membership with that club and either find a more lawful club or start your own exclusive one?

The club only seeks to collect more and more revenue and fees from these new members, in order to both generate more revenue and to control more and more of the population by forcing its registration of all things and children. So why would anyone stay as a member of that club only to be forced to tolerate a cultural invasion and complete change in the standards of that club? Why would you continue to financially support that club’s central governing body when everything it does goes against your ideals and values?

So why do you continue to stay a member of the United States club?

It’s not a requirement! It’s not necessary for you to work and live in America and in a State. This beast’s Social Security number is not needed for anything at all. And it certainly isn’t helping you to stay a member, unless you consider tyranny, unjust taxation without representation, pain, punishment, and extortion your political right like government does.

We complain, we scream, we weep, and we suffer. And all because we believe that we must stay members of this corporation that continuously harms us. We accept the mark and the number of this beast because we believe it is for the greater good. We support its illegal wars and pay for them with our voluntary taxes. It doesn’t listen or care about us as anything but commodities, because a corporation only cares about growth (expansion) and profits. It sells our labor and bonds our incarceration. It takes all and gives nothing.

So why are you still a citizen of this 10 mile square corporation that seeks to control every aspect of your life through your voluntary contractual obligation? Isn’t it time to pull the plug and stop financially supporting its exaction tactics to extort your money and estate?

Isn’t it time to take back your registered United States property and place it back into your personal possession, including your children?

Or are a few non-guaranteed benefits at the expense of future generations (your children and theirs) more important than being free?

Do you really think it would be un-American to withdraw your membership to this corporation that isn’t even part of America?

Since the concept of being an American seems to have been blurred between the natural and the contractual, perhaps we should end here with a quote from the most American thing I can think of…

“When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.

That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security…”

–Declaration of Independence

.

–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Saturday, May 18th, 2013

 

All legal definitions taken from Bouvier’s Law Dictioanry, 1856:

A World Without Gray – Episode 3 – For Land And Country


Episode 3, for your listening enjoyment. This is my interview with Vicky Davis, writer and researcher of ChannelingReality.com

I highly recommend that you read the following information (below) before or after listening to this interview, for I believe it is one of my most important research projects yet in uncovering the true nature of the United States. Also, please watch the two videos at the end, for a glimpse of the future of mankind and America…

Download here: https://realitybloger.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/awwg_e3_02072013.mp3

–=–

For Land And Country

–=–

What does it mean to you when someone says “fight for your country”?

For some, the concept of just what a “country” is becomes blurred between two completely different things. While the conversational term for country usually defines the living people, the physical land, and the fictional government together in one neat package, the fact is that these things are quite different from one another, and are only connected through ink and consent of those living people as a “body politic”.

The “land” – the real and tangible thing we call home – is indeed not legally the “country”. Living men are also not legally the country.

The country is in fact a reamed folder of legal papers, notarized and signed by the appropriate members of a corporate “federation” called the United States. It’s borders are demarcated within this paperwork, but these too are not part of the actual physical land. It sets its own rules, changes those rules with the signing of a pen, and does so without the will of the people.

The land and the living people who inhabit it are called a country – a body politic – but only in a legal sense. The people, in order to inhabit this artificial country legally as “residents”, must also become artificial. They must become persons through contract so as to be part of (citizens) of this legal “country”.

“A “federation” is by definition an unincorporated entity, but a “federated” entity is corporated. A “union” of states is not a corporate entity, but that the “United” States is a corporation.”

Confused? You are supposed to be.

Instead of taking my word for it, I wonder what the government, the courts, and the Supreme Court thinks?

“Persons dealing with the government are charged with knowing government statutes and regulations, and they assume the risk that government agents may exceed their authority and provide misinformation,” –Lavin v. Marsh, 644 F.2d 1378 (9th Cir. 1981), 644 F.2d, at 1383.

“Whatever the form in which the government functions, anyone entering into an arrangement with the government takes a risk of having accurately ascertained that he who purports to act for the government stays within the bounds of his authority, even though the agent himself may be unaware of the limitations upon his authority.” –Federal Crop Insurance v. Merrill, Supreme Court, 332 U.S. 380

From the West LegalEdcenter’s Securities Litigation Report:

Link: http://corporate.findlaw.com/finance/cftc-sees-dodd-frank-reforms-essential-to-reduce-future-risk.html

“International Coordination”

Twenty-first century finance knows no true geographic borders. Money and risk can move around the globe with a touch of a button. Sober evidence of this was AIG’s swaps affiliate, AIG Financial Products, which had its major operations in London. When it failed, the U.S. economy and taxpayers shouldered a tremendous burden.

The current debt crisis in Europe is but a stark reminder of our interconnectedness. Moreover, it is precisely during times of heightened market uncertainty that transparent pricing of risk is essential. While European leaders are working to avert a deepening crisis, it is critical that we implement the Dodd-Frank Act to protect the American public.

We are actively consulting and coordinating with international regulators to promote robust and consistent standards in swaps oversight. We are sharing many of our memos, term sheets and draft work product with international regulators. Building on these efforts, I will be traveling to London to discuss derivatives reform as well as issues relating to high-frequency trading.

We also will work with international colleagues on memoranda of understanding for access to information and cooperative oversight. We also have a long history of recognizing foreign regulatory regimes. The Dodd-Frank Act authorizes the CFTC to recognize foreign regulatory frameworks that are comprehensive and comparable to U.S. oversight of the swaps markets in certain areas. We also anticipate seeking public input on the application of Section 722(d) of the Dodd-Frank Act, which says that the law doesn’t apply to activities outside the United States unless those activities have a direct and significant connection with activities in, or effect on, U.S. commerce.

So, let’s get this straight… The Dodd-Frank Act was a tool by Congress to prohibit one of government’s regulatory corporations (the Commodities Futures Trading Commission – CFTC) to act outside of United States jurisdiction as long as the activities to be regulated are outside of the United States? Yes sir. But the reality of what this means is even more shocking. For when the term “outside of the United States” is utilized here, it is referring to United States borders (remember, they are paper borders created by treaty and international agreements). This is where “Inland Ports” and “Foreign Trade Zones” come into play. This is how your “country” (both the land and the government) is incrementally being pulled out from under your feet – while American Idol agonizingly plays in the other room – through contracts, treaties, and international agreements.

If we were to look at a true representative interactive map of the borders of the United States, it would actually look like a U.S. shaped slice of Swiss cheese. Incrementally, as each Inland Port and Foreign Trade Zone is implemented, a new hole in the middle of the United States appears, where U.S. laws are non-existent.

Let’s take a land-locked state like Colorado for example. As there are no oceans (international waters) touching any of Colorado’s borders (the land), there is only one way to create an Inland Port in this state. The state must become a virtual body of water.

When an Inland Port is created, it becomes an international jurisdiction under international Maritime Law. And since Maritime/Admiralty law is the “law of the sea”, the land must become a port among a body of water in legal terms. Thus, as a port receiving trade through trade-routes, the land now becomes international jurisdiction. it’s brilliant really, when you stop and think about it. Suddenly a port pops up in the middle of of the land, with no water around it whatsoever. And yet it falls under the law of the sea!

So how is this accomplished?

Perhaps you’ve heard of the controversial NAFTA Super Highways…

You see, the rest of the United States (the land) becomes a “land-bridge” over virtual (paper) water between these ports and zones, and the roads and highways now outside of the United States called NAFTA represent international virtual waterways under international Admiralty Law going from Inland Port to Inland Port. Thus, the whole structure of ports and highways are under the law of the sea – outside of the United States. Why start a limited corporation in the great state of Colorado when you can move 10 miles away into an unlimited Foreign Trade Zone? Why hire American workers with all of their demands and minimum wages laws when you can hire foreigners living in these Foreign Zones? After all, anyone can live and work in the Zones without being a United States citizen. And with no U.S. labor laws, health insurance, or pension funding requirements for retirement, why hire American when you can hire Chinese, Indonesian, or Indian at a fraction of the cost? It’s just on the other side of the Highway you know…

In the middle of America…

So now let’s get back to government’s opinion:

“The House and Senate Reports accompanying the legislation virtually compel this conclusion, explaining as they do that “a foreign government’s . . . employment or engagement of laborers, clerical staff or marketing agents . . . would be among those included within” the definition of commercial activity. H.R.Rep. No. 94-1487, p. 16 (1976) (House Report); S. Rep. No. 94-1310, p. 16 (1976) (Senate Report)…”

“I had thought the [507 U.S. 349, 369] issue put to rest some time ago when, in a slightly different context, CHIEF JUSTICE Marshall observed:

“It is, we think, a sound principle, that when a government becomes a partner in any trading company, it divests itself, so far as concerns the transactions of that company, of its sovereign character, and takes that of a private citizen. Instead of communicating to the company its privileges and its prerogatives, it descends to a level with those with whom it associates itself, and takes the character which belongs to its associates, and to the business which is to be transacted. Thus, many States of this Union who have an interest in Banks, are not suable even in their own Courts; yet they never exempt the corporation from being sued. The State of Georgia, by giving to the Bank the capacity to sue and be sued, voluntarily strips itself of its sovereign character, so far as respects the transactions of the Bank, and waives all the privileges of that character. As a member of a corporation, a government never exercises its sovereignty. It acts merely as a corporator, and exercises no other power in the management of the affairs of the corporation, than are expressly given by the incorporating act.” –U.S. Supreme Court, Bank of the United States v. Planters’ Bank of Georgia (1824) 22 US (9 Wheat) 904, 6 L.Ed 244

See also Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. Republic of Cuba, 425 U.S. 682, 695 -696 (1976) (plurality opinion).”

(Source: http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=507&invol=349)

According to Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, under the definition for the word “corporation”, it states:

“Chief Justice Marshall describes a corporation to be “an artificial being, invisible, intangible, and existing only in contemplation of law. Being the mere creature of law,” continues the judge, “it possesses only those properties which the charter of its creation confers upon it, either expressly or as incidental to its very existence. These are such as are supposed best calculated to effect the object for which it was created. Among the most important are immortality, and if the expression may be allowed, individuality properties by which a perpetual succession of many persons are considered, as the same, and may act as the single individual, They enable a corporation to manage its own affairs, and to hold property without the perplexing intricacies, the hazardous and endless necessity of perpetual conveyance for the purpose of transmitting it from hand to hand. It is chiefly for the purpose of clothing bodies of men, in succession, with these qualities and capacities, that corporations were invented, and are in use.”

(Author’s Note: It is important to note here that technically the corporation of the United States or portions thereof can be “conveyed” to foreign hands, including the United Nations. Remember, this is all on paper, through treaties and agreements. And it wont likely make the nightly news as it happens piece by piece, port by port, zone by zone… This can all be done while never changing the corporate charter name of “United States” or of states, counties, cities (municipal corporations), and districts.)

And this legal definition goes on to state:

Corporation: “Nations or states, are denominated by publicists, bodies politic, and are said to have their affairs and interests, and to deliberate and resolve, in common. They thus become as moral persons, having an understanding and will peculiar to themselves, and are susceptible of obligations and laws. Vattel, 49. In this extensive sense the United States may be termed a corporation; and so may each state singly.”

And Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856, defines the word corporator as:

CORPORATOR. One who is a member of a corporation. 2. In general, a corporator is entitled to enjoy all the benefits and rights which belong to any other member of the corporation as such. But in some corporations, where the rights are of a pecuniary nature, each corporator is entitles to those rights in proportion to his interest; he will therefore be entitled to vote only in proportion to the amount of his stock, and be entitled to dividends in the same proportion. 3. A corporator is not in general liable personally for any act of the corporation, unless he has been made so by the charter creating the corporation.

(Author’s Note: This means the American people can be made liable for United Nations debt or funding, and that the United States is a member- i. e. not a “sovereign” entity – with only a “vote” in world affairs, including its own.)

Note here that the United States is a “member” of the United Nations, and of the International Monetary Fund (World Bank).

Can you put the pieces together?

And of course when Bouvier’s defines the United States, it says:

UNION. By this word is understood the United States of America; as, all good citizens will support the Union.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. The name of this country. The United States… 5. The United States of America are a corporation endowed with the capacity to sue and be sued, to convey and receive property.

Again from the Supreme Court – near the year of the founding of this “country”…

“If Congress, previous to the Articles of Confederation, possessed any authority, it was an authority, as I have shown, derived from the people of each province in the first instance. When the obnoxious acts of Parliament passed, if the people in each province had chosen to resist separately, they undoubtedly had equal right to do so as to join in general measures of resistance with the people of the other provinces, however unwise and destructive such a policy might and undoubtedly would have been. If they had pursued this separate system, and afterwards the people of each province had resolved that such province should be a free and independent state, the state from that moment would have become possessed of all the powers of sovereignty internal and external — viz., the exclusive right of providing for their own government, and regulating their intercourse with foreign nations — as completely as any one of the ancient kingdoms or republics of the world, which never yet had formed or thought of forming any sort of federal union whatever. A distinction was taken at the bar between a state and the people of the state. It is a distinction I am not capable of comprehending. By a state forming a republic (speaking of it as a moral person) I do not mean the legislature of the state, the executive of the state, or the judiciary, but all the citizens which compose that state and are, if I may so express myself, integral parts of it, all together forming a body politic. The great distinction between monarchies and republics (at least our republics) in general is that in the former, the monarch is considered as the sovereign, and each individual of his nation as subject to him, though in some countries with many important special limitations. This, I say, is generally the case, for it has not been so universally.

But in a republic, all the citizens, as such, are equal, and no citizen can rightfully exercise any authority over another but in virtue of a power constitutionally given by the whole community, and such authority, when exercised, is in effect an act of the whole community which forms such body politic. In such governments, therefore, the sovereignty resides in the great body of the people, but it resides in them not as so many distinct individuals, but in their politic capacity only. Thus A. B. C. and D., citizens of Pennsylvania and as such together with all the citizens of Pennsylvania, share in the sovereignty of the state. Suppose a state to consist exactly of the number of 100,000 citizens, and it were practicable for all of them to assemble at one time and in one place, and that 99,999 did actually assemble. The state would not be in fact assembled. Why? Because the state in fact is composed of all the citizens, not of a part only, however large that part may be, and one is wanting, in the same manner as 99 is not a hundred, because one pound is wanting to complete the full sum.

But as such exactness in human affairs cannot take place, as the world would be at an end or involved in universal massacre and confusion if entire unanimity from every society was required; as the assembling in large numbers, if practicable as to the actual meeting of all the citizens, or even a considerable part of them, could be productive of no rational result because there could be no general debate, no consultation of the whole, nor of consequence a determination grounded on reason and reflection, and a deliberate view of all the circumstances necessary to be taken into consideration, mankind has long practiced (except where special exceptions have been solemnly adopted) upon the principle that the majority shall bind the whole, and in large countries, at least, that representatives shall be chosen to act on the part of the whole. But when they do so, they decide for the whole, and not for themselves only.

Thus when the legislature of any state passes a bill by a majority, competent to bind the whole, it is an act of the whole assembly, not of the majority merely. So when this Court gives a judgment by the opinion of a majority, it is the judgment, in a legal sense, of the whole Court. So I conceive when any law is passed in any state in pursuance of constitutional authority, it is a law of the whole state acting in its legislative capacity, as are also executive and judiciary acts constitutionally authorized, acts of the whole state in its executive or judiciary capacity, and not the personal acts alone of the individuals, composing those branches of government. The same principles apply as to legislative, executive, or judicial acts of the United States, which are acts of the people of the United States in those respective capacities, as the former are of the people of a single state. These principles have long been familiar in regard to the exercise of a constitutional power as to treaties. These are deemed the treaties of the two nations, not of the persons only whose authority was actually employed in their formation. There is not one principle that I can imagine which gives such an effect as to treaties that has not such an operation on any other legitimate act of government, all powers being equally derived from the same fountain, all held equally in trust, and all, when rightfully exercised, equally binding upon those from whom the authority was derived.

I conclude, therefore, that every particle of authority which originally resided either in Congress or in any branch of the state governments was derived from the people who were permanent inhabitants of each province in the first instance and afterwards became citizens of each state; that this authority was conveyed by each body politic separately, and not by all the people in the several provinces or states jointly, and of course that no authority could be conveyed to the whole but that which previously was possessed by the several parts; that the distinction between a state and the people of a state has in this respect no foundation, each expression in substance meaning the same thing; consequently, that one ground of argument at the bar, tending to show the superior sovereignty of Congress in the instance in question, was not tenable, and therefore that upon that ground the exercise of the authority in question can not be supported.”

(Source: http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/3/54/case.html)

This important opinion tells you one very important thing… You do not now or did they then live in a true idealistic republic! If you are a citizen, you are nothing more than a part of the whole citizenry (in this case equality is a bad thing, for it takes away your rights). You are the State – a tiny piece of the jigsaw puzzle made up of equal size citizens. The people and the State are the same thing. “Distinct individuals have no power or sovereignty – only the state does as a body politic of all the people combined. This literally squashes the theory that in the United States all men are kings of themselves. This is just a falacy to be shelved with all the other “free country” myths out there. And the State creates these treaties and agreements with Foreign entities with the legal presumption that you don’t give a damn!

You aren’t fighting it, if you even know about it, and so the plans for world governance and the conveyance of the United States lands into United Nations (NWO) hands goes on unhindered.

For some clarification, here are the Bovier’s Law Dictionary definitions of a “Republic”:

REPUBLIC. A commonwealth; that form of government in which the administration of affairs is open to all the citizens. In another sense, it signifies the state, independently of its form of government. 1 Toull. n. 28, and n. 202, note. In this sense, it is used by Ben Johnson. Those that, by their deeds make it known, whose dignity they do sustain; And life, state, glory, all they gain, Count the Republic’s, not their own, Vide Body Politic; Nation; State.

REPUBLICAN GOVERNMENT. A government in the republican form; a government of the people; it is usually put in opposition to a monarchical or aristocratic government. 2. The fourth section of the fourth article of the constitution, directs that “the United States shall guaranty to every state in the Union a republican form of government.” The form of government is to be guarantied, which supposes a form already established, and this is the republican form of government the United States have undertaken to protect. See Story, Const. §1807.

Yet another common fallacy squashed by the constitution itself!

Some how the people of the United States have mixed up the notion that the “United States” government – the central government of Washington D.C. as a federation – is supposed to be a republic. But this is not what the constitution states at all. The only requirement of the United States Federal Government laid out in its constitution is that the United States corporation in Washington D.C. must protect the already establish form of government of each individual state. Remember, the citizen is subject to two forms of government, one the state and one Federal.

On this, the Supreme Court state its opinion:

“The people of the United States resident within any State are subject to two Governments: one State, and the other National; but there need be no conflict between the two. The powers which one possesses, the other does not. They are established for different purposes, and have separate jurisdictions. Together they make one whole, and furnish the people of the United States with a complete government, ample for the protection of all their rights at home and abroad. True, it may sometimes happen that a person is amenable to both jurisdictions for one and the same act… It is the natural consequence of a citizenship which owes allegiance to two sovereignties, and claims protection from both. The citizen cannot complain, because he has voluntarily submitted himself to such a form of government.–The Supreme Court, 92 US 551: “U.S. v Cruikshank”

While you may live in a republic within your individual state, you do not live in a republic called the United States. The distinction here is absolutely key, and the tempering of fallacious considerations of the intent of the national government

And if “Common Law” is your bag, you should know that in the same case the Supreme Court stated its opinion about the Common Law:

“It is a rule at common law (the reason applies in equity and other civil law cases) that if a party can plead a fact material to his defense, and omits to do it at the proper time, he can never avail himself of it afterwards.”

Now why would anyone in their right mind agree to such a sinister and offending rule as this? And why would anyone submit to this?

Can you imagine…

You: Oh yeah judge, I forgot to mention that I have a video tape and 20 witnesses that saw me 1,000 miles away from the scene of the crime at the exact time of the crime.

Judge (as his gavel smashes down): Inadmissible! Guilty as charged!!!

It goes on to say:

“The law rather chooses that a party should incur a risk of this nature than leave a door open to endless litigation upon pretenses the truth of which it is very difficult to discover.”

God forbid we should have long litigation in order to discover the truth!

This is called the “justice system”, by the way. And the only thing common about common law is that it is commonly tyrannical just like any other legal system. Even if you had a good experience in court by a judge who seemed lawful or constitutional, this does not dismiss the fact that at any time this type of “opinion” can arise. It’s a rule that a judge may choose to follow at his whim. And while a man acting as judge may certainly consider late evidence, he certainly is not required to. Law means nothing to a corrupt politician or judge. And it is certainly a fallacy to overlook the rules just because once you had a good experience. The fallacy: This judge acted fairly and constitutionally, therefore all judges act fairly and constitutionally.

In this particular case, believe it or not, the “person” harmed was actually physically dead, but since the defendants did not claim this fact within the discovery process, this fact actually had no bearing on the case. The fact that the person was dead was not considered when doing wrong to that person. Image how that felt to the defendants when those words were uttered by the judge, who were no doubt thinking… Why in the hell would this fact even need to be mentioned???

It states:

“II. The death of Doane has been alleged for another purpose.

It is said that the decree is to restore to Elisha Doane, which was impossible because Elisha Doane was not then in being. Admitting that upon this record we are to take judicial notice that Doane was dead at the time of pronouncing the decree (in which I am by no means clear), yet if this was the real reason why the plaintiffs in error had withheld the property or its proceeds, they might themselves have said so. They have not, and as each party generally makes the best of his own case, we are to presume that did not in fact constitute their reason. In this case it could be of no avail but at the utmost to prevent the allowance of interest until a demand actually made. It never could destroy the whole beneficial effect of a decree given in rem, and when the parties who make the objection were in court and parties to the very decree complained of. I think nothing can be more evident than that if the decree be not totally void, the administrators are entitled to the benefit of it, at least until it is set aside for error, if there be any error in it, and such a remedy is now practicable. If a scire facias was necessary before execution could have been obtained out of the court which passed the decree, it could be for no other reason than that the other party might have an opportunity to contest the validity of the letters and the existence of the administration, if any such objection could be supported. Such an objection might have been made here. It has not been made. There is therefore, I conceive, no principle of law or justice which forbids giving effect to the decree upon this ground.”

You: But judge, the victim was already dead before I had anything to do with her!

Judge: Inadmissible! Guilty as charged!!!

Ok, extreme I admit. The point is that the possibility – as a rule – is that at any time a judge can dismiss crucial evidence that would prove your innocence without considering it.

But listen to what was stated even later in this case:

“A court of justice, indeed, ought at its peril to take notice of its own jurisdiction, and it is not often that cases of such doubt arise that a judge can be at a loss on the subject. But it may happen and does sometimes happen that innocent and serious doubts are really entertained. Is a court therefore, because its judgments may be finally dissented from by a superior tribunal, to be considered as flying in the face of the law, so that parties before it shall not only be protected in disobeying it but punished for their obedience? If this be the case, the old maxim cedunt arma togae (let arms yield to the toga – modern: let military power give way to civil power) will very ill apply to courts of justice. Instead of being the peaceful arbiters of right and the sacred asylum of unprotected innocence, their very forums will be the seat of war and confusion.”

Why is this all so important to the establishment of a New World Order Government?

Well let’s see… so far the Supreme court has allowed corporations to be people with rights, allowed these corporations to merge and acquire each other to establish monopolies and trusts,  allowed these corporations not only to clone life but to create new genetically altered life and then patent that life-form as a novel (unique) property of the corporation and government, it has ruled that children can be vaccinated without parental consent, it has allowed the United Nations to claim a part of the City of New York as international land immune from U.S. law, and seems to not be at all concerned with the thousands of Presidential Directives and Executive Orders that have allowed everything from martial law in America to unmanned drones for the use of killing Americans abroad and spying on them nationally.

Now why in God’s name would I put my trust in this body of “Justices” to do the right thing in protecting me or my country or to  combat the implementation of world governance? They are, after all, appointed by the same president and congress that is allowing it to happen in the first place! They aren’t even voted in by the people who suffer their opinions!!!

So what does it mean to you to” fight for your country”?

Well, you better start comprehending that your country and your state is in the control of a rogue government, and that to save the land the government must not be allowed to expand globally by expanding its ream of paper to include all of the United Nations as it’s master.

The “United States” is in the process of becoming  nothing more than an admiralty law-based “land-bridge” between oceans and countries, a port of call for the world government and its corporations built with your taxpayer money.

And all of this proving the pen is mightier than the sword, simply because the people will not wield the sword as their fore-fathers supposedly did.

In our interview, we discussed that in order to create a new World Government, the current borders of the United States must be destroyed. It is, however, important to state that the individual state governments and borders need not be demolished simply because the Federal government and borders are abolished. It is in fact the contractual nature of the individual states to this central government which is the cause of the loss of individual state sovereignty. As individual republics, under a new United States “union” the country would be no less grand.

Is it only me that feels this way?

…whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness… all experience hath shown, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”

–Constitution of the united states of America

“Whenever the ends of government are perverted, and public liberty manifestly endangered, and all other means of redress are ineffectual, the people may, and of right ought to reform the old, or establish a new government. The doctrine of nonresistance against arbitrary power, and oppression, is absurd, slavish, and destructive of the good and happiness of mankind.”

–New Hampshire Constitution, Article 10 of the Bill of Rights

“All power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority and instituted for their peace, safety, happiness and the protection of property. For the advancement of these ends, they have at all times an inalienable and indefeasible right to alter, reform or abolish their government in such manner as they may deem proper.”

–Kentucky Constitution, Kentucky Bill of Rights

“All power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority and instituted for their peace, safety and happiness. For the advancement of these ends they have at all times an inalienable and indefeasible right to alter, reform or abolish their government in such manner as they may think proper.”

–Pennsylvania Constitution, Article 1, Section 2 of the Declaration of Rights

“3d. That Government ought to be instituted for the common benefit, protection and security of the people; and that the doctrine of non-resistance against arbitrary power and oppression is absurd, slavish, and destructive to the good and happiness of mankind.”

–North Carolina Constitution, November 21, 1789

All political power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority, and instituted for their benefit. The faith of the people of Texas stands pledged to the preservation of a republican form of government, and, subject to this limitation only, they have at all times the inalienable right to alter, reform or abolish their government in such manner as they may think expedient.”

–Texas Constitution, Article 1, Section 2

“Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by rule of law.”

–Universal Declaration Of Human Rights, United Nations (paying lip service to this decree with despicable arrogance and confidence as it subsumes all other constitutions!)

So what part of this aren’t you comprehending?

And just what do you think the 2nd amendment is for?

Better listen to the show now folks, and start to grasp exactly what’s happening in a local, county, district, state, and national government near you. For right this very second, government is doing all of the above for you, on paper, handing over the “country” to a global corporate federation, making the above options of abolition obsolete and unlawful with each treaty and contract your representatives sign, conveying the land to foreign interests…

And remember, just because you don’t see it doesn’t change the fact that it”s happening…

This is what you are truly fighting:

And the future of food (just replace metal powder with protein powder):

Truth is so much stranger than fiction, and so much closer to science fiction than imaginable.

In closing, I can only say that no matter what your “country” means to you; no matter how you define it – I think now would be a good time to start fighting for it while it’s still recognizable as such, and while we still have a resemblance to natural humans.

.

–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Monday, February 11th, 2013

Zionism 101 – The Complete Story


 

≈Ω≈

To listen to the voice recording of this essay,

please click HERE to download. (3 hours!)

 

≈Ω≈

Please see part 2 of this essay here: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2010/08/29/zionism-101-the-zionist-israeli-government-of-the-united-states-of-amerika/

≈Ω≈

Author’s note: I have put off tackling this subject publicly and in depth for a long time, not wanting to believe in its veracity nor in the reality that mankind can be this dark and evil. And as I began my research, with the limited knowledge that I’d already acquired on the subject, it was intended to be the story of Zionism through only the quote’s of Zionists in their own words. But as the real history of Zionism became horrifically apparent through painstaking research and comprehension, I decided to turn this into an essay intended as a historical swim through the darkest bowels of human history, at the risk of illogical racist labels and public gelding of my credibility in the stead of logical discussion and debate, and despite the blatant Zionist quotes, which are referenced and sourced herein. I can only ask that whoever you are, no matter your color or creed or religion or race, that you read or listen to this essay in its entirety, with the foreknowledge that race, prejudice, or hatred is left at the door in regards to the writing contained within… and that the point in history for there to still be “a point in history” that this can all be turned around is approaching so quickly, that it may already be too late. I apologize to anyone whose material that I may have emulated but not sourced, if that is the case. It was unintentional, and I personally thank you for your bravery in going against the most powerful evil force on this planet with the most powerful lobby’s and political control in the world. I would also ask that, if any of this can be dis-proven, please, please, please make the evidence available to me so that I can correct this essay. I’d like nothing more than to be wrong about the following information. And of all the subjects I’ve researched, this is the one that I’ve hoped against all hope is not true, because this truly is the source of evil in this world. As the author, I hold no indemnity or copyright for this writing nor the recording attached, and would ask that you please pass this on to everyone you can if it so moves you, keeping all sources intact, and with the soul intention of the protection of all of our multi-faceted histories, cultural heritages, and our beautiful spectrum of colors… and in the interests of erasing a long history of falsified and indoctrinating education in this world.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

“To see what is in front of one´s nose requires a constant struggle.”

—George Orwell, 1946

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

“None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.”

—Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

“There is nothing more frightening than active ignorance.”

Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

 

Recently, the news of yet another outrageous Israeli terror attack came to light. This time, it was against an aid boat in international waters trying to sail to the Gaza Strip to deliver much needed humanitarian aid, medical supplies, and some food to the Palestinians there – who are refugees in their own land and homes. Of course, if Israel is in the middle of a genocide of the Palestinians, allowing foreign aid and medical supplies into the strip wouldn’t make much sense, would it? A bit like providing an antidote to the poison for someone you want to murder…

Since the significance (and repetitiveness) of this attack (and the cold blooded murder of the twenty or so activists on board) might be lost on some of you, I wanted to write this essay to open your eyes to just what the state of Israel represents, to explain the difference between the Jewish people and the Zionist movement, and to develop a comprehension on how this Zionist movement has taken over almost every aspect of American society, its media, the world banking and corporate structure, and how this small group has infiltrated our churches and our culture with the intention of subverting it, destroying our country, and stealing our wealth and virtue.

Now, this may sound like a hard claim to prove, like a “conspiracy theory” if you will… and I’ll admit that it took a while for me to truly comprehend this conundrum, since I’ve (we’ve) been indoctrinated with holocaust stories and movies our entire lives. But this is actually one of the easiest things I’ve written about. Why? Because all I have to do is use their own words! By simply quoting these Zionist harbingers of war, destruction, and death, there can be no doubt of their intentions or of their plan (conspiracy) to dominate and control America and the world.

But before we begin, I want to deeply stress the fact that Zionist’s do not care about the good Jewish people. They are cattle to them, just as much as the rest of the Gentiles on Earth; we are the Goyim. Opposing Zionism is not in any way opposing real Jews. They are not at all synonymous, though many Jews are brainwashed into the Zionist movement. Also, there are countless Jews whom are vehemently opposed to Zionism and even to the state of Israel. And there are many websites, like: Jews Against Zionism and Jews Against Israel to underscore this divide. So please read this essay without passing judgment on the Jewish race itself, for Americans aren’t the only culture that can be stupid enough to be fooled into supporting murder and genocide. Remember that, for we are all sheep to Rothschild created Zionist elite. And it is important to understand that the word “Jew” in many of the below quotes is not referring to the Jewish race as a whole, but to the Zionist cult that has risen up and embedded themselves within the Jewish society, using the Jewish people as fodder, and hiding within their culture so that they can name anyone who opposes them as an anti-Semite (or anti-Jew).

And so I say that this essay is as much for the good Jewish people – as fellow humans of this Earth – as it is for all Gentiles (Goyim) who may be reading or listening. It is even for the supremacist Zionists, whom I hope will see the error of their ways in supporting and following this atrocity called Zionism.

Please drop your pre-conceived notions and indoctrination, and read or listen to this entire essay, for the full context of the quotes by mostly Jewish Zionist’s will astound you….

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

And now… let these Zionist words be your guide…

But first, let’s start with a short history lesson:

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Question: What is the only country in the Middle-East that has made actual repeated, admitted, and well-documented terrorist attacks against America?

In the 1950’s in what is now called the Lavon Affair, the Israeli government sent Jewish agents into Egypt to blow up American movie theaters, libraries, and other American targets. But when a Jewish terrorist’s bomb exploded prematurely, the incident led to the capture of the entire Israeli terrorist cell involved. As with all political terrorism by a government, this attack was meant to lead America into a war with the innocent nation of Egypt. However, since Israel was caught red-handed, and it admitted in the Jerusalem Post to the terrorist attack against America, Egypt was saved by grace. But the Zionist/Jewish dominated media of America quickly swept this Israeli Government attack against America under the carpet. If carried out in its intended clandestine fashion, America would have attacked Egypt. But no retaliatory strike was submitted against Israel, and no war ensued. Instead, America just continues year after year to send weapons, bombs, and billions of American tax-payer dollars to Israel, which wouldn’t exist without United States and other countries funding it from around the world.

(headline) “Israel Honors Heroes of Lavon Affair” (article) “Although it is still a sensitive situation, we decided to express our respect for these heroes, President Moshe Katzav said…” — Jewish Newspaper, Haarets.com, which never made mainstream American news. Israeli President Katzav then presented three surviving members of the Lavon Affair with certificates of appreciation at a Jerusalem ceremony. June 1, 2006.

Despite the fact that the president of Israel calls these terrorists heroes, not a single Congressman, Senator or media outlet in America spoke negatively of Israel for praising the Israeli Zionist terrorists who committed this false flag terrorist attack against Egypt and America. Remember, the word terrorism throughout history is rooted from governments using terror to inflict political change and as a pretext to war.

In 1967, Israel committed another false flag terrorist attack against America when it bombed the USS Liberty. On a crystal clear day, Israel attacked a fully-marked American intelligence ship, which was in international waters and flying the American flag. After close monitoring by Israeli pilots for “several days”, the Israeli air force in a surprise attack began dropping Napalm onto the USS Liberty, even as the men on board helplessly waved to what they at first thought were friendly planes in friendly fire. After burning some of the ships men, they began using cannon and machine gun fire against the ship. After considerable damage, Israel came at the ship with torpedo boats in a failed attempt to sink the USS Liberty and ensure the deaths of all aboard. They even machine-gunned the life rafts that the crew had deployed when it looked as if the Liberty was going to sink, which is a major war crime.

34 Americans were murdered, and 173 Americans were wounded, maimed, and burned from Napalm, some beyond recognition.

Again, Egypt was to be officially blamed for the attack, just as it was to be for the Lavon Affair.

“Israel made a knowing and deliberate attack against the USS Liberty…we refused to accept their explanations. I didn’t believe them then, and I don’t believe them to this day. The attack was outrageous.” —Dean Rusk, U.S Secretary of State.

(headline) “Israel communications said to prove IAF knew Liberty was U.S. ship.” (article) “The Israel Air Force warplanes and Israel Navy warships that attacked the USS Liberty on June 8, 1967, at the height of the Six-Day War, were aware that the vessel was an American spy ship, according to new testimony published Thursday in the Chicago Tribune.” —Jewish correspondent Yossi Melman, Haaretz.com, a Jewish newspaper.

“These soldiers and Marines were entitled to our best defense. We gave them no defense. Did our government put Israel’s interests ahead of our own? If so, why? Does our government continue to subordinate American interests? The American people deserve to know the truth about this attack… It is a duty we owe not only to the brave men of the USS Liberty, but to every man and woman who is asked to wear the uniform of the United States.” —Thomas Moorer, Former Chairman of The Joint Chiefs of Staff, who was privy to top secret documents pertaining to the USS Liberty.

“I WANT THAT DAMN SHIP SUNK” —President Lyndon B. Johnson, overheard by several witnesses through radio on ships within range to assist the USS Liberty, but whom were ordered not to.

Dozens of Israeli spies have been caught in the United States since the USS Liberty attack. The most famous of these was an American Zionist Jew named Johnathan Pollard. Even the Jewish-descended Casper Weinberger stated that the the Pollard spy case was the most damaging spy case in the history of America. Pollard stole top secret information regarding American intelligence operatives and sources in Europe. Israel then sold this information and names of these operatives to the Soviets, causing the capture, torture, and killing of hundreds of U.S. operatives in Eastern Europe.

“No one in the history of the United States who spied… came close to causing the colossal damage Pollard did to our national security.” —Ron Olive, Chief U.S. Investigator.

“American Jew arrested for spying: I did it for Israel.”   —Jeruselem Post, front page headline.

The fact is… year after year, America just keeps exporting more taxpayer money to Israel, and even continues to send weapons and bombs. The people of Palestine are literally being killed with these weapons paid for by all U.S. citizens. We cannot blame our government, without blaming ourselves for letting this happen right under our noses.

Israel is one of the only countries in the Middle East who has consistently refused to sign the Nuclear non-proliferation treaty. Iraq, Afghanistan, and most importantly Iran have all signed this treaty, AND DO NOT HAVE NUCLEAR WEAPONS! Yet these are the countries America attack’s in Israel’s name. A bully always attacks the week.

Israel is also the only country in the Middle East that has a huge stockpile of nuclear weapons. Israel has over 200 nuclear warheads in its possession – not a good thing for a supremest terrorist state to have, if I don’t say so myself… Yet the United States government and its media almost completely ignores this fact, and attacks without just cause all of the Arab countries which pose absolutely no threat to Americans in any way – countries which should be our allies in commerce and peace. And America does this because it is the will of Israel. America’s foreign policy is dictated by the pro-Israel Zionist’s who have usurped this country, its government, its wealth and commerce structure, its media, and its peoples public opinion about itself and Israel.

“(Zionist Jews, he himself) doesn’t believe in western morality… The only way to fight a moral war is the Jewish way: destroy their holy sites. Kill men, women, and children (and cattle).” —Manis Friedman, famous Jewish Rabbi.

“We can still remember the smell of Auschwitz and Treblinka… next time we will take all of you with us!” —Israeli official, as quoted by Semour M. Hersh’s “The Samson Option”.

On October 12, 2000, the U.S.S. Cole was attacked while harbored and refueling in the Yemeni port of Aden. 17 American sailors were killed, and 39 were injured. The attack was conveniently blamed on Al Qaeda, who claimed fairy-tale like convenient responsibility (in the Zionist controlled media) as a suicide bombing. The U.S. government held the Arab nation of Sudan liable for the attack, and froze the countries assets.

According to former CIA intelligence officer Robert Finke, the blast appeared to be caused by explosives molded into a shaped charge against the hull of the boat. It was speculated at the time that over 1,000 pounds of explosive were used.

Does this sound like a suicide attack? That’s a lot of explosives! I certainly can’t squat 1000 pounds…

It is important to note that FBI Special Agent John O’Neil had quit his job at the FBI after his investigation into the U.S.S. Cole attack in Yemen was obstructed and sabotaged by U.S ambassador to Yemen, Zionist Barbara Bodine. This is because the U.S.S. Cole was NOT done by Al Qaeda. The USS Cole was hit by an Israeli cruise missile (Source, 39th pp) to sway public opinion against Arabs (Al Qaeda), as well as to demonize the democrats (whom publically didn’t take the terror threat seriously) so that their Zionist Israel friendly puppet George W. Bush Jr. could be hurled into office in time for 9/11 with a rigged election. This was of course completely covered up.

More on John O’Neil below…

The events of September 11, 2001 have been white-washed by the government and the American media to reflect only Arab involvement. Of course, Israel’s sworn enemy is the entirety of the Arab nations.

“One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail.” —Rabbi Yaacov Perrin, New York Daily News, February 28, 1994, page 6.

“Even the best of the non-Jews should all be killed.” —Rabbi Simon ben Yahai, Talmud, Minor Tractates, Soferim 15, Rule 10.

There is overwhelming evidence that the Mossad, the equivalent of the CIA in Israel, is the party most responsible for 9/11. From Israeli companies paying huge fines for breaking their leases to exit the World Trade Center just days before 9/11, to the many Jewish people told not to fly and to stay out of the World Trade Center buildings on that day (only five Israelis died on 9/11, and two of the five were supposedly aboard the supposedly hijacked flights – however, many good regular Jewish people did die that day), to the obvious involvement and cover-up of top Zionist and pro-Israel U.S. officials in offices of political power, to the fact that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11, to the fact that Osama Bin Laden (whose CIA asset name was indeed Mr. Tim Osman) was never actually charged with any crime related to 9/11, to the fact that Israel is steering the United States in the direction of war (undeclared war through occupation and destruction of infrastructure and takeover and theft of resources) with innocent Arab countries despite continuously being caught in false flag terrorist attacks for which they blame on these Arab nations, to the reality of claims that Israeli Mossad agents are generally responsible for killing our soldiers in so-called “suicide bombings” and other attacks for which they portray as being perpetrated by Muslim Al Qaeda “insurgents” in a fake, undeclared war in Iraq and Afghanistan.

“Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target U.S. forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act.” —SAMS officers, about the the Israeli intelligence service MOSSAD, and reported in the Washington Post on September 10, 2001.

The word Al Qaeda has a few interpretations…. interestingly, it was the name given to a CIA computer program many years ago before the terrorist group supposedly emerged

Perhaps more interestingly, it is hilariously also used as a slang for “the toilet”.

Yeah… if I were a terrorist group, I’d call myself “The Toilet” too… Imagine a Mexican gang naming themselves El Bano, or a French gang called La Bidet!

Former FBI Special Agent John O’neil, who was tasked with investigating Bin Laden (and had classified information), was hired as the head of security at the World Trade Center after leaving the CIA by staunch Jewish Zionist Jerome Hauer, who had advised the White House to go on the anti-biotic effective against Anthrax — Cipro — a week prior to the actual mailings of anthrax later blamed on “Al Qaeda terrorists”. Hauer was an ‘expert’ in bio-terrorism and in charge of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) response to the anthrax “attacks”.

In a more than obvious conspiracy, John O’neil was killed on his FIRST DAY OF WORK at the WTC, which was September 11, 2001.

Philip Zelikow, who is a dual citizen of Israel and the United States (as were many others in the Bush cabinet) – was appointed the executive director of the 9/11 commission… In other words, a Zionist Israeli held the most powerful position on the 9/11 committee! This criminal Zionist Jew was responsible for concocting the “official story” of 9/11, as reported in the 9/11 Commission Report.

For the full Zionist 9/11 story, go here: http://pakalert.wordpress.com/2009/12/01/israel-did-911-all-the-proof-in-the-world/

…and by all means, do the research and verify this for yourself!

9/11 was just another false flag attack carried out by Zionist Israel, blamed on the Arab countries once again, and used as a catapult to force the American people through government control into unpopular terrorist attacks on friendly Arab nations, with the people’s unwittingly misguided support. But in reality, since our own government is jam pack full of Zionist, duel Israeli citizens and traitors to our country, it was our government that let it happen, for the same reasons: to kill millions of innocent Arab men, women, and children in the name of Zionism and Israel. And America continues to fight Israel’s false wars… with U.S. taxpayer money.

And finally, just today I found a press release from Washington that almost seemed to encourage my pursuit of this subject…

“Declassified files detailing an FBI investigation targeting the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC – the most powerful lobby in the United States) are now available on the Internet. AIPAC was investigated after it acquired and circulated classified government information provided in strict confidence by US industry and worker groups opposed to AIPAC sponsored economic legislation.” —PRNewswire-USNewswire, Forbes, March 10, 2010

The full article can be seen here: http://www.forbes.com/feeds/prnewswire/2010/03/10/prnewswire201003101051PR_NEWS_USPR_____DC68258.html

The article details leaked classified information, corporate espionage, usurpation of government authority with Israeli intelligence officers undercover in AIPAC, theft of government property, Dan Halpern interviews admitting to passing classified U.S. documents to AIPAC as well as lists of the trators, and more. These files are available on the internet for the first time, and should be utilized while the internet still can be.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Ever heard about the real holocaust?

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

From 1917 to 1945, the “Bolshevik Revolution” and its communist “Red Army” ethnically cleansed and killed at least 7 million Germans and millions more white Christians across all of Eastern Europe. They raped at least 2 million German women and millions more Eastern European women. 7 million Christians were enslaved and killed in the Ukraine Holodomor. The Red army enslaved Eastern Europe for almost half of a century.

Who was the founder of the Bolshevik Red Army? None other than Leon Trotsky (real name: Lev Bronstein), who is listed as:

“One of the greatest Jewish Generals in History.” —Jewish Encyclopedia, 1943 vol. 10, pg. 312.

Trotsky oversaw the murder of millions of Christian Russians.

In fact, 5 of the 6 Bolshevik Red Army leaders were Jewish, including Lenin, Trotsky, Zinoview, Kamenov, and Sverdlov. All of these men spoke Yiddish.

“The Bolsheviks were led by non-Russians who hated the Russian people!” —Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Russian dissident and Nobel Peace Prize winner – from when the award was actually given for peace.

Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s book entitled “The Gulag Archipelago”, written between 1958 and 1968, was only seen distributed in “samizdat” or underground publication in the Soviet Union until it was allowed to be published there in 1989, and is now required reading in Russian schools, as a sense of nationalism is now with the New Russia. The word “archipelago”, the Greek word for a cluster or chain of islands, compares the system of labor camps spread across the Soviet Union as a vast “chain of islands”, known only to those who were fated to visit them. The book goes against the myth that the forced labor camps in Russia were Stalin’s brainchild, and shows that Lenin was the instigator of this vast system of slave labor gulag camps in the pre-Stalin era, for which Stalin re-vamped later on.

Perhaps this is why outspoken Americans like me are so fearful of the vast prison system in America, including our WW2 prison camps left over from when we imprisoned anyone of Japanese origin, and the newer Halliburton/KBR no-bid contracted FEMA prison camps being built throughout the land. Old Dick Cheney is the kingpin of the private prison business… talk about a candidate for a Red Army general!!!

“The Gulag Archipelago” also exposes the six administrators of this “island chain of labor camps”, the greatest killing machine in all of history, which include Aron Solts, Yakov Rappoport, Lazar Kogan, Matvei Berman, Genrikh Yagoda, and Naftaly Frenkel. None of these men were Russian in ethnicity, but were in fact Zionist Jews.

Now, understand that Zionism predates the 1900’s. The First Zionist Congress was held in Basel, Switzerland in 1897, and has roots way before this time. And we must remember, Zionists did not have a state of their own until they violently took over Palestine when the United Nations voted for the creation of it on May 14th, 1948. It is ironic and sad that this would become the new Jewish Zionist “Independence day”. I wonder what the Palestinians who lost their independence on that day must call it?

(headline) “Stalin’s army of rapists: The brutal war crime that Russia and Germany tried to ignore” (Article) “As well as the estimated two million rapes in Germany, there were between 70,000 and 100,000 in Vienna and anywhere from 50,000 to 200,000 in Hungary, as well as thousands in Romania and Bulgaria, which had been pro-Nazi, but also in Poland, Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia, which had not been.”   —Mail Online, October 24th, 2008, describing new controversial movie “A woman in Berlin”.

“Indeed, as Beevor points out, the Red Army even raped Russian women who had been liberated from concentration camps, emaciated and wearing their prison uniform… Overall, however, Russian soldiers tended to prefer plumper and better-fed women, and one diarist recorded the satisfaction felt by some Berlin women that these tended to be the wives of Nazi Party functionaries… Vodka played a role, of course, but the worst of the behavior was fueled by sheer hatred and aggression, as well as a cold-hearted sense of deterrence for the future.”   —Mail Online article, October 24th, 2008, “Stalin’s army of rapists…”

“They do not speak a word of Russian, but that makes it easier… You don’t have to persuade them. You just point a revolver and tell them to lie down. Then you do your stuff and go away.” —Russian Red Army soldier, written in a letter sent to his home, dated February 1945. It was unusual for Red Army soldiers to admit to rape in letters home, -Mail Online, October 24th, 2008, “Stalin’s army of rapists…”

“In the house next to ours, Soviet troops went in and pulled the women on to the street, had their mattresses pulled out and raped the women… The men had to watch, and then the men were shot. Right at the end of the street, a woman was tied to a wagon wheel and terribly misused. Of course, you had the feeling that you wanted to stop it, but there was no possibility to do that.’ Women going to and from work past Red Army pickets were routinely raped.” —John Noble, local inhabitant of Dresden, post war interview in 1945, Mail Online, October 24th, 2008, “Stalin’s army of rapists…”

“Weeks before you entered this house, its tenants were living in constant fright and fear… By day and by night, plundering Russian soldiers went in and out, raping my sisters before their own parents and children, beating up my old parents. All furniture, wardrobes and trunks were smashed with bayonets and rifle butts, their contents soiled and destroyed in an indescribable manner.” Hans-Dietrich Muller Grote, wealthy German publisher, writing to President Truman about the place he stayed in during the Potsdam conference of July 1945. -Mail Online, October 24th, 2008, “Stalin’s army of rapists…”

I dare say that most of these acts were shamefully and successfully blamed on the German peoples as part of the “Jewish holocaust”. Perhaps this is the shameful alternative hidden history that “holocaust denial” stems from?

“Women, mothers, and their children lie to the right and left along the route and in front of each of them stands a raucous armada of men with their trousers down. The women, who were bleeding or losing consciousness, get shoved to one side, and our men shoot the ones who try to save their children. A group of ‘grinning’ officers ensured that ‘every soldier without exception would take part. Richard Evans, Professor of Modern History at Cambridge, quoting a young Russian officer recalling how his unit overtook a column of fleeing German refugees. -Mail Online, October 24th, 2008, “Stalin’s army of rapists…”

“Rape was often accompanied by torture and mutilation and frequently ends in the victim being shot or bludgeoned to death. The raging violence was undiscriminating. The insistence on the men watching the rapes was deliberate policy, intended ‘to underline the humiliation. Underlying all this foul inhumanity was the way the German Army and its allies had behaved during its invasion of Russia. That was clearly not the only explanation  –  it doesn’t explain why the Red Army raped Poles, Czechs and Yugoslavs and even Russian women, for example  –  for that one has to delve deep into the darkest recesses of the male psyche. Yet the four years of life-and-death conflict did brutalize the Soviet peasant-soldier and taught him to behave like a beast against the women of his enemies once he was given the chance. The Soviet-German war lasted 1,418 days without respite, and for sheer horror there is nothing to equal it in the long and monstrous annals of human warfare.”Richard Evans, Professor of Modern History at Cambridge, from his book, -Mail Online, October 24th, 2008, “Stalin’s army of rapists…”

“The only two non Jews in the communist conspiracy were Chambers and Hiss. Every other one was a Jew and it raised hell with us.” President Richard Nixon, 1971, White House tapes released by the National Archives in 1999, I.E. Whittaker Chambers and Alger Hiss, Reference in N.Y. Times, Oct. 7, 1999 and Newsweek, Oct. 18, 1999, p. 30)

“There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of the Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews” —Winston Churchill

“Lenin was a Jew by the standards of Israel’s Law of Return: he possessed a Jewish grandparent. It would seem that not only was Lenin a Jew, but that he was a Jewish racist and chauvinist, although he kept his ideas on this volatile subject far in the background, probably because they were in radical conflict with the supposed universalism of Marxism. …Lenin was a Jewish racist who deliberately gave Jews especially, the most ‘intellectually demanding tasks.’ He admitted that 50% of the communist terrorist vanguard in the south and west of Russia was comprised of Jews.” —Researcher Wayne McGuire of Harvard University


“We are exterminating the bourgeoisie as a class.” —Lenin

“The interests of the revolution require the physical annihilation of the bourgeoisie class.” —Apfelbaum (Zinoviev)

“The longer the rotten bourgeoisie society lives, the more and more barbaric will anti-Semitism become everywhere.”   —Leon Trotsky, New York Daily Forward, a Jewish newspaper, interview in 1937.

“Without mercy, without sparing, we will kill our enemies in scores of hundreds. Let them be thousands; let them drown themselves in their own blood. For the blood of Lenin and Uritzky, Zinoviev and Vólodarsky, let there be floods of the blood of the bourgeoisie–more blood! As much as possible!” —top Communist Jewish official Zinoviev, Krasnaya Gazeta, Sept. 1, 1918.


Who was this bourgeoisie class?

“Bourgeoisie was a Bolshevik code-word for Gentile. The first law passed after the Communists seized power in Russia made anti-Semitism a crime punishable by death.” —Izvestia, July 27, 1918.

And finally, we get to a true source of pure evil – Zionist Jew and Communist leader, Elya Ehrenburg.

“If your part of the front is quiet and there is no fighting, then kill a German in the meantime… If you have already killed a German, then kill another one – there is nothing more amusing to us than a heap of German corpses.” —Elya Ehrenburg

“Kill! Kill! In the German race there is nothing but evil; not one among the living, but one among the yet unborn but is evil!” —Elya Ehrenburg

“Use force and break the racial pride of these German women. Take them as your lawful booty. Kill! As you storm onward, kill, you gallant soldiers of the Red Army.” —Elya Ehrenburg

“Ilya Ehrenburg: A True Jewish Hero of the Second World War” —headline, Jewish News

“PM: Israel to Erect Red Army Memorial” —Jerusalem Post, February 16, 2010, Headline, Prime Minister Netanyahu honoring Bolshevik Red Army under the guise of its “crucial role in the victory over the Nazis.

From its earliest days, Zionist Jewish international bankers supported and financed the Bolshevik Red Army:

Financier capitalist Jacob Schiff, head of Goldman Sachs, personally gave 17 million dollars to the Bolchevik cause throughout these brutal years.

If you get anything out of this “real holocaust” section, I can only hope that it is this: Our boys in uniform are in the same exact position now in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and soon to be Iran and Egypt as these Russian Red Army soldiers were for the first half of last century. They are being led by the Zionist and Zionist friendly regime that has taken over our country and our military. As history repeatedly shows, this means that otherwise good and moral virtuous men can and will be pressured and ordered into doing things that they would otherwise never do, in a foreign country with no rules or fear of war crimes, since no war is officially declared against any country by the United States. Thus, the raping, torture, and murder of millions of innocent Arab men, women, and children is happening now, right now, under the former pro-Zionist Israel Bush and new pro-Zionist Israel Obama regimes, by our manipulated soldiers. The American and coalition forces, whether you like it or not, have become the new Red Army. The suicide rate among our soldiers alone who cannot face the horrors of their acts against innocents should be sufficient enough to prove this. As hard as this is to stomach, it is the truth. And Americans are now in the same position as Eastern Europe was so long ago… We can continue to let it happen and try to forget it later, though perpetual war against the unknown and indistinguishable “terrorists” will always be the Zionist goal, or we can come together and stop the Zionist controllers and bankers now – and possibly salvage our hope, our respect, our dignity, and our pride. And maybe we can even save our country and the principles for which it was founded from the dark annals of our history.

“Nowdays an anti-Semite is someone hated by Jews” —Dr. Hajo Meyer, holocaust “survivor”, Auschwitz camp. Dr. Meyer is also ridiculously called an anti-Semite by the Zionists, despite the fact that he is a Jew and former Nazi labor camp prisoner.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

A short world history of Jewish expulsion:

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Just in Europe and Russia alone, the (Khazarian) Zionist Jews have been banished over 47 times in the last 1000 years (not including this last century):

Mainz, 1012 – France, 1182 – Upper Bavaria, 1276 – England, 1290 – France, 1306 – France, 1322 – Saxony, 1349 – Hungary, 1360 – Belgium, 1370 – Slovakia, 1380 – France, 1394 – Austria, 1420 – Lyons, 1420 – Cologne, 1424 – Mainz, 1438 – Augsburg, 1438 – Upper Bavaria, 1442 – Netherlands, 1444 – Brandenburg, 1446 – Mainz, 1462 – Mainz, 1483 – Warsaw, 1483 – Spain, 1492 – Italy, 1492 – Lithuania, 1495 – Portugal, 1496 – Naples, 1496 – Navarre, 1498 – Nuremberg, 1498 – Brandenburg, 1510 – Prussia, 1510 – Genoa, 1515 – Naples, 1533 – Italy, 1540 – Naples, 1541 – Prague, 1541 – Genoa, 1550 – Bavaria, 1551 – Prague, 1557 – Papal States, 1569 – Hungary, 1582 – Hamburg, 1649 – Vienna, 1669 – Slovakia, 1744 –  Moravia, 1744 – Bohemia, 1744 – Moscow, 1891. —Excerpted from “The Synagogue of Satan” by Andrew Carrington Hitchcock. This was not the end, as we all know recent history.

“It can hardly be an accident that antagonism directed against the Jews is to be found pretty much everywhere in the world where Jews and non-Jews are associated. And as the Jews are the common element of the situation it would seem probable, on the face of it, that the cause will be found in them rather than in the widely varying groups which feel this antagonism.Professor Jesse H. Holmes, writing in “The American Hebrew”.

If this hostility, even aversion, had only been shown towards the Jews at one period and in one country, it would be easy to unravel the limited causes of this anger, but this race has been on the contrary an object of hatred to all the peoples among whom it has established itself. It must be therefore, since the enemies of the Jews belonged to the most diverse races, since they lived in countries very distant from each other; since they were ruled by very different laws, governed by opposite principles, since they had neither the same morals, nor the same customs, since they were animated by unlike dispositions which did not permit them to judge of anything in the same way, it must be therefore that the general cause of anti-Semitism has always resided in Israel itself and not in those who have fought against Israel.—Bernard Lazare, noted Jewish author, from his book “L’antisemitisme son histoire et ses causes”, published in 1894, regarding the history of the expulsions of Jews from so many cultures.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

And then there was that bastard, Hitler…?

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

“40,000 Roar Protest Here Against Hitler” —front page headline, New York Daily News, with the picture of a massive anti-German protest rally held in Madison Square Garden on March 27, 1933.

“Judea Declairs War On Germany, Jews Of All The World Unite” – “Boycott Of German Goods” – “Mass Demonstrations In Many Districts” – “Dramatic Action”  front page headline and column headlines, London Daily Express, March 24, 1933.

“The whole of Israel throughout the world is uniting to declare an economic and financial war on Germany. The appearance of the Swastika as the symbol of the new Germany has revived the old war symbol of Judas to new life. Fourteen million Jews scattered over the entire world are tied to each other as if one man, in order to declare war against the German persecutors of their fellow believers. The Jewish wholesaler will quit his house, the banker his stock exchange, the merchant his business, and the beggar his humble hut, in order to join the holy war against Hitler’s people… (Germany is) now confronted with an international boycott of its trade, its finances, and its industry…. In London, New York, Paris and Warsaw, Jewish businessmen are united to go on an economic crusade… worldwide preparations are being made to organize protest demonstrations,” and reported that “the old and reunited nation of Israel gets in formation with new and modern weapons to fight out its age old battle against its persecutors.”   —London Daily Express, March 24, 1933.

Similar rallies and protest marches were also being held in other cities during the same time frame. The intensity of the Jewish campaign against Germany was such that the Hitler government vowed that if the campaign did not stop, there would be a one-day boycott in Germany of Jewish-owned stores. Despite this, the hate campaign continued, forcing Germany to take defensive measures that created a situation wherein the Jews of Germany became increasingly and marginalized. The truth about the Jewish war on Germany has been suppressed by most histories of the period.

“Germans! Defend yourselves! Don’t shop at Jewish stores!” —sign held by protester after the Zionist Jews declared a world-wide boycott on Germany. Defense and offense are two different concepts.

I wish to confirm, in the most explicit manner, the declarations which I and my colleagues have made during the last month, and especially in the last week, that the Jews stand by Great Britain and will fight on the side of the democracies. Our urgent desire is to give effect to these declarations [against Germany]. We wish to do so in a way entirely consonant with the general scheme of British action, and therefore would place ourselves, in matters big and small, under the coordinating direction of His Majesty’s Government. The Jewish Agency is ready to enter into immediate arrangements for utilizing Jewish manpower, technical ability, resources, etc.”   Chaim Weizmann, president of both the international “Jewish Agency” and of the World Zionist Organization (and later Israel’s first president), written to British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain in a letter published in The London Times, September 6, 1939.

As a consequence of this formal declaration of war, the German authorities thus deemed Jews to be potential enemy agents. This would be like Mexico declaring war on America today, and America’s reaction would be to stop ignoring the millions of illegal aliens in its borders, and to stop employing their labor and patronizing their shops…

“In connection with the Jewish question I have this to say: it is a shameful spectacle to see how the whole democratic world is oozing sympathy for the poor tormented Jewish people, but remains hard-hearted and obdurate when it comes to helping them – which is surely, in view of its attitude, an obvious duty. The arguments that are brought up as an excuse for not helping them actually speak for us Germans and Italians. For this is what they say: (1) “We,” that is the democracies, “are not in a position to take in the Jews.” Yet in these empires there are not even 10 people to the square kilometer. While Germany, with her 135 inhabitants to the square kilometer, is supposed to have room for them! (2) They assure us: We cannot take them unless Germany is prepared to allow them a certain amount of capital to bring with them as immigrants. For hundreds of years Germany was good enough to receive these elements, although they possessed nothing except infectious political and physical diseases. What they possess today, they have by a very large extent gained at the cost of the less astute German nation by the most reprehensible manipulations.Today we are merely paying this people what it deserves. When the German nation was, thanks to the inflation instigated and carried through by Jews, deprived of the entire savings which it had accumulated in years of honest work, when the rest of the world took away the German nation’s foreign investments, when we were divested of the whole of our colonial possessions, these philanthropic considerations evidently carried little noticeable weight with democratic statesmen.” —Adolf Hitler, January 30, 1939, in a speech at the Reichtag.

When you take the Zionist Hollywood persona out, and add the Bolshevic history and historical Jewish expulsion and world-wide boycott of Germany years before WW2, Adolf Hitler, the real man, suddenly begins to sound a lot like modern Americans complaining about illegal immigration, now doesn’t he?

– The following is an excerpt from “The Jewish Declaration of War on Nazi Germany – The Economic Boycott of 1933”, from The Barnes Review, by M. Raphael Johnson, Ph.D…

To the Zionist leaders, Hitler’s assumption of power held out the possibility of a flow of Jewish immigrants to Palestine. Previously, the majority of German Jews, who identified themselves as Germans, had little sympathy with the Zionist cause of promoting the ingathering of world Jewry to Palestine. But the Zionists saw that only the anti-Semitic Hitler was likely to push the anti-Zionist German Jews into the arms of Zionism.

For all the modern-day wailing by worldwide supporters of Israel (not to mention the Israelis themselves) about “the Holocaust”, they neglect to mention that making the situation in Germany as uncomfortable for the Jews as possible – in cooperation with German National Socialism – was part of the plan.

Note to readers of this article who can also read German: a booklet discussing the emigration of Jews from Third Reich Germany, and the Transfer Agreement that facilitated their emigration, may be found here!

This was the genesis of the so-called Transfer Agreement, the agreement between Zionist Jews and the National Socialist government to transfer German Jewry to Palestine.

According to Jewish historian Walter Laqueur and many others, German Jews were far from convinced that immigration to Palestine was the answer. Furthermore, although the majority of German Jews refused to consider the Zionists as their political leaders, it is clear that Hitler protected and cooperated with the Zionists for the purposes of implementing the final solution: the mass transfer of Jews to the Middle East.

Edwin Black, in his massive tome The Transfer Agreement (Macmillan, 1984), stated that although most Jews did not want to flee to Palestine at all, due to the Zionist movement’s influence within Nazi Germany a Jew’s best chance of getting out of Germany was by emigrating to Palestine. In other words, the Transfer Agreement itself mandated that Jewish capital (money) could only to go Palestine.

Thus, according to the Zionists, a Jew could leave Germany only if he went to the Levant (Eastern Mediterranean/Palestine area).

It was one thing for the Zionists to subvert the anti-Nazi boycott. Zionism needed to transfer out the capital of German Jews, and merchandise was the only available medium. But soon Zionist leaders understood that the success of the future Jewish Palestinian economy would be inextricably bound up with the survival of the Nazi economy. So the Zionist leadership was compelled to go further. The German economy would have to be safeguarded, stabilized, and if necessary reinforced. Hence, the Nazi party and the Zionist organizers shared a common stake in the recovery of Germany….

The result was the understanding that Zionism would have to ally itself with National Socialism, so that the German government would not impede the flow of Jewish capital out of the country.

It served the Zionist interests at the time that Jews be loud in their denunciations of German practices against the Jews to scare them into the Levant, but, on the other hand, Laqueur states that “The Zionists became motivated not to jeopardize the German economy or currency.” In other words, the Zionist leadership of the Jewish Diaspora was one of subterfuge and underhandedness, with only the advent of German hostility towards Jewry convincing the world’s Jews that immigration was the only escape.

The fact is that the ultimate establishment of the state of Israel was based on fraud. The Zionists did not represent anything more than a small minority of German Jews in 1933.

On the one hand, the Zionist fathers of Israel wanted loud denunciations of Germany’s “cruelties” to the world’s Jews while at the same time demanding moderation so that the National Socialist government would remain stable, financially and politically. Thus Zionism boycotted the (1933) boycott.

For all intents and purposes, the National Socialist government was the best thing to happen to Zionism in its history, for it “proved” to many Jews that Europeans were irredeemably anti-Jewish and that Palestine was the only answer: Zionism came to represent the overwhelming majority of Jews solely by trickery and cooperation with Adolf Hitler.

For the Zionists, both the denunciations of German policies towards Jews (to keep Jews frightened), plus the reinvigoration of the German economy (for the sake of final resettlement) was imperative for the Zionist movement. Ironically, today the Zionist leaders of Israel complain bitterly about the horrific and inhuman regime of the National Socialists. So the fraud continues.

–End Excerpt

And this if anything, shows the difference between the Jew and the Zionist.

And with the disclaimer that Germany and Hitler were not innocent in any way of the atrocities of war, and that this is in no way trying to portray Hitler in a heroic or positive light, only a truthful one, the real atrocities under Zionist Jewish control in the Bolshevik Revolution and Red Army, which in reality continue today with the attempted ethnic cleansing of Palestine, Iraq, and all Arab countries, as well as a constant attack on white Europeans, far outweighs Germany’s efforts. And there were not anywhere close to the 6 million Jews quoted in the ridiculous Zionist holocaust propaganda in and around Germany, with way less than 1 million living in Germany, of which more than half were exported out to other countries and the new Israel.

So in a nutshell… With the German economy already in shambles from the first World War, the world-wide Jewish Zionist population first declared a total economic boycott on Germany in 1933 to hurt its economic stability and growth even more, and then declared all out war on Germany in 1939 by joining with Great Britain, all the while pumping misinformation and blatant propaganda about the country. While the Jews in Germany were German citizens, who identified as being German and anti-Zionist, the Zionist agenda to start the Jewish Zionist state of Israel by taking over Palestine through United Nations decree, purposefully made it so that Germany could no longer trust the Jews living in Germany since the world-wide Jewish population were now at war with Germany, in order to force Germany to export its Jews to Palestine (the new Israel). Since Jews were prominent businessmen in Germany, and the exportation of these Jewish Germans would cause even more economic monetary upheaval in Germany, not to mention the fact that they didn’t want to leave, Hitler decided to not agree to the Zionist terms to force Germany to allow the Jews to leave with all of the German wealth they had acquired. (Imagine if all the Jewish business owners of America wanted to pick up and leave all of a sudden with all of their assets and American money, and what would happen to America’s economy… to really comprehend this and its consequences, see the last section of this essay on the boycott of Zionist owned companies – America would be in economic shambles far worse than Germany). And so, the Zionists entered into an unholy alliance (the Transfer Agreement above) with Hitler’s National Socialist Party to allow Jews to be exported from Germany, all the while still spreading horrific propaganda about Hitler, his army, and the people of Germany. And when all was said and done, and the surrender of Germany was complete, the stories of Jewish holocaust and extermination were forced onto the world, hiding the true history of the Zionist lead Bolshevik Red Army’s horrific war crimes and labor camps from the annals of true world history. And ever since, most white-European countries have been conned into paying “reparations” to Israel in the form of billions and billions of dollars, as well as supplying weapons, and Israel could not support itself or its ethnic cleansing efforts without these.

This is the Zionist group we are dealing with today – inside of our own country, economy, and government.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

But what about the Nazi death camps?

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

As far as the prison/forced labor camps that have been deemed “Nazi Death camps”… let’s have a look at the most notoriously lied about camp in Zionist holocaust history, named Auschwitz:

This is a factual list of some of the facilities available to prisoners at the alleged Nazi death camp of Auschwitz in Poland. Most of these facilities can still be seen in the camp today, including the cinema, swimming pool, hospital, library and post office…

Camp complaints office – where inmates could register complaints or make suggestions. Camp Commander Hoess had a standing order that any inmate could approach him personally to register a complaint about other inmates such as “Kapos” and even guards.

Auschwitz maternity ward – Over 3,000 live births were registered here, with not a single infant death while Auschwitz was in operation under German rule – and had a child care center where working mothers could leave their children.

*I’m sorry… but the disconnect between killing Jews and then rearing and caring for their babies with such finesse doesn’t really make sense to me. How about you?

Camp kitchen – one of the largest service buildings in Auschwitz, with state-of-the-art cooking facilities. There were twelve of these throughout the camp.

* The caloric content of the diet was carefully monitored by camp and Red Cross delegates. These only deteriorated in Auschwitz and other camps towards the end of the war when German railroads and the entire transport system collapsed under constant allied aerial attacks – Germans kept meticulous records of everything.

Red Cross death records at Auschwitz – show prisoner deaths mostly from disease like Typhoid and of old age: http://www.air-photo.com/english/deathbooks.html

Saunas (with small ovens) and gyms– for delousing clothing, as lice carried Typhus (Typhoid fever): http://www.air-photo.com/english/sauna.html

Major French Magazine Acknowledges Auschwitz Gas Chamber Fraud: http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v15/v15n1p23_Weber.html

Interview with Dr. Franciszek Piper, Director of Auschwitz State Museum: http://www.codoh.com/gcgv/gcgvcole.html

The Auschwitz State Museum has recently revised its half-century-old claim that 4 million humans were murdered in the Auschwitz camp. They now claim that maybe around 1 million were murdered. And to offer proof of this claim… the museum has nothing! Yet the museum displays disturbing piles of hair, boots, eyeglasses, and other items of clothing and personal possessions from supposedly murdered prisoners. As propaganda these are admittedly effective tools. However, as evidence of murder, they are ridiculous.

The following is taken from the Institute For Historical Review, and can be seen here: http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/holohoax.htm

–Begin Exerpt–

Fred A. Leuchter is America’s leading specialist on the design and fabrication of execution equipment, including homicidal gas chambers. In 1988, Leuchter scraped samples from the alleged gas chamber walls in Auschwitz, Birkenau and Lublin. Cyanide residue would be clearly evident on all these walls if gassings did occur. To his astonishment, Leuchter found no significant cyanide traces in any one of these rooms.

In 1991, the Polish government repeated these tests to disprove Leuchter’s findings, but they as well found no evidence of any gassings ever occurring.

The structural integrity of these “gas chambers” is also extremely faulty. These rooms have ordinary doors and windows which are not hermetically sealed! There are large gaps between the floors and doors. If the Germans had attempted to gas anyone in these rooms, they would have died themselves, as the gas would have leaked and contaminated the entire area. Also, no equipment exists to exhaust the air-gas mixture from these buildings. Nothing was made to introduce or distribute the gas throughout the chambers. There are no provisions to prevent condensation of gas on the walls, floors or ceilings. No exhaust stacks have ever existed.

Though six million Jews supposedly died in the gas chambers, not one body has ever been autopsied and found to have died of gas poisoning.

We have been shown piles of bodies from World War II, but most of these persons died of typhus or starvation (according to Red Cross records) or Allied bombings and a great many of those were murdered Germans, not Jews. Roughly the equivalent of ten football fields should be packed full of gassed bodies to present as evidence, yet not one body has ever been discovered.

The Germans documented everything in meticulous detail from shrubbery to arbors, but no pre-war or wartime plans or documents exist that detail or even mention any gas chambers for reasons of genocide. All documents ever presented were drawn up AFTER the war.

Even if we threw away all the evidence and accounted for every so-called gas chamber, it would have taken 68 YEARS to accomplish gassing six million Jews!

Even “The Diary of Anne Frank” is a hoax. Portions of the diary were written with a ball point pen. These pens were not in use at the time Anne Frank lived…

There are compelling reasons to believe that the so-called holocaust never existed. Page 223, in “The Diary of Anne Frank”, (Pan Horizons edition, Pan Books Ltd., London, 1989), indicates that the size of Auschwitz, the most notorious of all German work camps, WAS VERY SMALL, with only 11,000 people (many of whom may not even have been Jews) being evacuated by the Germans at the time of the Russian advance in 1945. Certainly, compared to Spielberg’s film, Schindler’s List (which Emilie Schindler, Oskar’s widow, said was full of lies), and other Jewish propaganda, that millions upon millions of Jews were systematically exterminated, 11,000 people is a very small number. Simple arithmetic tells us that the Germans would have had to have had hundreds of camps, or else they would have had to exterminate 137 people PER HOUR, in order for six million Jews to have been exterminated at such small camps as Auschwitz, a feat that would have been humanly impossible considering that, according to Douglas Reed’s “Behind the Scene and The Controversy of Zion”, a mere 850,000 soldiers and others were killed by the entire German and Japanese war machines combined during WW2 (see p.397-400 of Douglas Reed’s book Controversy of Zion). People who would believe the Jewish propaganda that six million Jews were exterminated by Hitler must KEEP IN MIND THE SMALL SCALE CONSTRUCTION OF AUSCHWITZ AND THE VERY FEW OTHER GERMAN WORK CAMPS THAT EXISTED DURING WW2.

On July 13, 1994, a documentary on the life of Charles A. Lindbergh broadcast on the Public Broadcast System (PBS – KENW-TV) said that when Lindbergh visited one of these few camps in Germany following WW2, he was told that 25,000 died in 1-1/2 years. Again, simple arithmetic tells us that 25,000 times a half dozen camps does not equal 6,000,000. In fact, it doesn’t even equal 600,000…

It is an interesting fact that the number of so-called persecuted Jews KEEPS INCREASING. Hal Greenwald, program director for the Hillel Foundation at Duke University, a Jewish student group, has been promoting the idea that “NINE MILLION JEWS WERE EXTERMINATED IN HITLER’S GAS CHAMBERS” (New York Times, Nov. 9, 1991, AP). NOW IT’S 9 MILLION AND GROWING… JUST LIKE OUR DEBT/TAX MONEY SUPPLY…THE NUMBERS JUST KEEP COMING OUT OF THIN AIR…

It is not denied concentration camps existed. Tragically, many died of typhus or starvation, as often happens in such situations. There is, however, no evidence that any gassings occurred for the reasons of genocide.

–End Exerpt–

If the holocaust story is true, why have the Zionist Jews enacted laws against “holocaust denial” around the world, and why are people arrested and imprisoned for questioning the holocaust in almost every country?  http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1226673/British-bishop-Richard-Williamson-trial-Germany-Holocaust-denial.html

Imagine if there was laws against “9/11 denial” and it was against the law for us in groups like “We Are Change” to protest and hold up signs or banners, or to even discuss 9/11.

All I can say is that if I had a labor camp that was building and supplying my war effort, I would not be killing my laborers and treating them poorly as is portrayed in the Hollywood holocaust. History is continuously showing that the Hollywood portrayal of slaves in ancient civilization such as Egypt, where slaves built the pyramids, has been completely misrepresented. In actuality, the Pharaohs provided many amenities and services to their slaves like oils, bountiful foodstuffs, and more than adequate shelter. It just doesn’t make sense to commit genocide against the people you absolutely need, nor does it make sense that the Germans would arbitrarily kill the Jews, at the same time that they were in an agreement with Zionist world-Judaism to export them. And finally, America didn’t rush in to save anyone else during the Bolshevik revolution, so why the sudden change of heart for the “poor suffering Jews” in Germany?

I can only hope that those reading or listening to this can think for themselves, and haven’t been so dumbed down that the truth is not attainable through logic and reason… and proof !!!

This is an essay about the American prison and labor camps which were set up for German prisoners by the USA, the French, etc… It is an accounting by a young American soldier who stood guard at these camps which housed German farmers and citizens. They were in open fields with no shelter surrounded by barb wire. They were starved, slept in the mud, and shot for “target practice”. The victorious always become the tyrants, even us. (or in my opinion, especially us.) These atrocities are human, and not race driven. Power corrupts anyone, even against their will, and we obey orders or face punishment… kinda like why we still pay taxes! This essay was published in The Journal of Historical Review, Summer 1990 (Vol. 10, No. 2), pp. 161-166. (Revised, updated: Nov. 2008). Please read: http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v10/v10p161_Brech.html.

“Americans had over 200 “concentration camps” after WW2 for German soldiers and people:” http://rense.com/general85/eis.htm

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Zionist Origins…

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

“As I show in my books, the campaign to impose a Rothschild fiefdom in Palestine goes back at least to the earlier part of the 19th century and probably long before. It was given a massive boost with the Balfour Declaration in 1917 when the British Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour declared in a letter his government’s support for a Jewish homeland in Palestine… This letter was sent by Balfour, an inner-circle member of an elite secret society called the Round Table, to Baron (Walter) Rothschild who funded the Round Table… Today, Rothschild Illuminati fronts like the Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg Group, Royal Institute of International Affairs, and others, still answer to the Round Table which string-pulls and coordinates from the shadows. This is why Zionists in government are invariably connected with these Rothschild-controlled organizations… The Rothschilds funded the early settlers from Europe to relocate in post-war Palestine and they also funded and armed the terrorist groups, like Irgun, which bombed and terrorized Israel into existence in 1948, a campaign which forced 800,000 Palestinians to leave the land of their birth… Israel is simply the State of Rothschild and how appropriate that they (Rothschilds) paid for the construction of the Israeli parliament building, the Knesset, and the Israel Supreme Court. The name Rothschild means Red-shield and it originates with the red shield ‘Star of David’ symbol (not a Jewish symbol before the Rothschilds) which they displayed on their house in Frankfurt… The very flag of Israel tells you who owns it. There are many reasons why the Rothschilds and their allies wanted to hijack Palestine and one was to keep the Middle East in a state of disruption and turmoil from which a global war can eventually be triggered to usher in the New World Order of world government dictatorship.” —David Icke, from his essay “The Zionist Elephant In The Room”, June 14, 2009

And yes, The New World Order is a term uttered thousands of times by all U.S. Presidents, including Obama (who’s real name, by the way, is Barry Soetoro – http://educate-yourself.org/cn/orlytaitzletter24feb09.shtml). Do not let these terms which have been downplayed and made to seem ridiculous in the Zionist controlled media stop you from comprehending the message of this writing. The New World Order is here, now! For proof of this, here is a great documentary – top on my list in fact – that I highly recommend you watch after you read this, which will make your head absolutely spin…

“Invisible Empire”, by Jason Bermis – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NO24XmP1c5E&feature=fvw

” …the last time I checked, Jews made up only 2% of the total U.S. population, and only 1.2% of Canada’s total population, barely 1% of France’s population, and a mere 0.5% & 0.45% of the U.K & Australian populations respectively. And for a greater understanding, consider that of the 13,000,000 or so Jews living on this planet, only 200,000 of them claim to be Chabad-Lubavitchers! So, what of this Jewish Supremacist Movement, the Chabad … this racist, merciless group of men who clasp the hand of “Democratically-elected” Western leaders with their right hand, whilst their left hand launches deceptive Telethon’s & “charities” in order to extract yet more money from U.S citizens for Israel’s continued slaughter of innocent women and children in Palestine – (Is 6 billion per annum in U.S. tax-payer dollars not enough, Oh Israel?!)” —Amalek, Radio Islam, Jewish Manipulation of  (non-Jewish goy) World Leaders.


“The only two non-Jews in the communist conspiracy were Chambers and Hiss. Every other one was a Jew and it raised hell with us.” President Richard Nixon, 1971, White House tapes, released by the National Archives in 1999, I.E. Whittaker Chambers and Alger Hiss, Reference in N.Y. Times, Oct. 7, 1999 and Newsweek, Oct. 18, 1999, p. 30)

And speaking of presidents, click here for some quite telling pictures – http://www.radioislam.org/jewish-photos/manipulat-the-wold/world-leaders-manipulated.htm

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

The Jewish Soap Myth

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Zionist Jews have been spreading lies about soap being made from Jewish human remains since WW2. But several sources have disproved this myth, and it has never been proven.

–Exerpt

“The owner of a Montreal collectibles shop is defending his decision to sell a bar of soap he advertises as being made of the fat of Holocaust victims.

Jewish groups in Montreal are denouncing the shop in the city’s Plateau-Mont-Royal neighbourhood where the beige bar of soap is displayed.

The soap is inscribed with a swastika and displayed in a glass case with a card that says “Poland 1940.”

On Friday, Abraham Botines, a Spanish-born Jew who has operated the quirky boutique since 1967, admitted he has no idea whether the soap is really made of human remains.”

–End Exerpt

“A lab analysis of a swastika-stamped bar of soap said to be made from Holocaust victims shows no human remains.It’s just a regular bar of soap,” Montreal Police Inspector Paul Chablo told the Canadian Press.” —Jewish Journal, “Montreal police: Soap not made from human remains“, June 3, 2010.

What needs to be understood about cases like these is that the myth and perpetual lie about the plight of the Jews in Nazi Germany will be carried on in the hearts of men, despite the fact that once again the myth was proven to be false. And besides, why would anyone want to take a bath with soap made from human remains. Come on, we have got to think about these things logically…

Similar charges were found to be a hoax as well in World War 1, and for the most part, holocaust historians both Jewish and other have had to grudgingly conceed to the soap rumor as just a story.

Also, for some strange reason, humans like to collect things like war memorabilia. Many collectors of the Nazi era have never run across Human soap, and say begrudgingly that it is an urban legend.

Now who could have started a legend like that…?

The following is part of the Institute For Historical Review, entitled “Jewish Soap”, by Mark Weber.

–Begin Exerpt

“Wartime rumors that the Germans were manufacturing soap from the corpses of slaughtered Jews were based in part on the fact that soap bars distributed by German authorities in Jewish ghettos and camps bore the impressed initials “RIF,” which many took to stand for “Rein juedisches Fett” or “Pure Jewish Fat.” (It did not seem to matter that the letters were “RIF” and not “RJF.”) These rumors spread so widely in 1941 and 1942 that by late 1942 German authorities in Poland and Slovakia were expressing official concern about their impact.

According to a Polish source quoted in a secret wartime U.S. Army military intelligence report, for example, the Germans were operating a “human soap factory” in 1941 at Turek, Poland. “The Germans had brought thousands of Polish teachers, priests and Jews there and after extracting the blood serum from their bodies, had thrown them on large pots and melted off grease to make soap,” the intelligence report added.

Macabre “Jewish soap” jokes became popular in the ghettos and camps, and many non-Jews on the outside came to believe the story. When trains loaded with Jewish deportees stopped temporarily at rail stations, Poles reportedly would gleefully shout at them: “Jews to soap!” Even British prisoners of war interned at Auschwitz in 1944 testified later about the wartime rumors that corpses of gassing victims were being turned into soap there.

In spite of its inherently incredible character, the soap story became an important feature of Jewish and Allied war propaganda. Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, wartime head of both the World Jewish Congress and the American Jewish Congress, publicly charged in November 1942 that Jewish corpses were being “processed into such war-vital commodities as soap, fats and fertilizer” by the Germans. He further announced that the Germans were “even exhuming the dead for the value of the corpses,” and were paying fifty marks for each body.

In late 1942, the Congress Weekly, published by the American Jewish Congress, editorialized that the Germans were turning Jews “by scientific methods of dissolution into fertilizer, soap and glue.” An article in the same issue reported that Jewish deportees from France and Holland were being processed into “soap, glue and train oil” in at least two special factories in Germany. Typical of many other American periodicals, the influential New Republic reported in early 1943 that the Germans were “using the bodies of their Jewish victims to make soap and fertilizer in a factory at Siedlce.”

During June and July 1943, two prominent representatives of the Moscow-based “Jewish Anti-Fascist Committee” toured the United States and raised more than two million dollars for the Soviet war effort at a series of mass meetings. At each of these rallies, Soviet Jewish leader Solomon Mikhoels showed the crowd a bar of soap that he said was made from Jewish corpses…

In spite of all the apparently impressive evidence, the charge that the Germans manufactured soap from human beings is a falsehood, as Holocaust historians are now belatedly acknowledging. The “RIF” soap bar initials that supposedly stood for “Pure Jewish Fat” actually indicated nothing more sinister than “Reich Center for Industrial Fat Provisioning” (“Reichsstelle fr Industrielle Fettversorgung”), a German agency responsible for wartime production and distribution of soap and washing products. RIF soap was a poor quality substitute that contained no fat at all, human or otherwise.

Shortly after the war the public prosecutor’s office of Flensburg, Germany, began legal proceedings against Dr. Rudolf Spanner for his alleged role in producing human soap at the Danzig Institute. But after an investigation the charge was quietly dropped. In a January 1968 letter, the office stated that its inquiry had determined that no soap from human corpses was made at the Danzig Institute during the war.

More recently, Jewish historian Walter Laqueur “denied established history” by acknowledging in his 1980 book, The Terrible Secret, that the human soap story has no basis in reality. Gitta Sereny, another Jewish historian, noted in her book Into That Darkness: “The universally accepted story that the corpses were used to make soap and fertilizer is finally refuted by the generally very reliable Ludwigsburg Central Authority for Investigation into Nazi Crimes.”

Deborah Lipstadt, a professor of modern Jewish history, similarly “rewrote history” when she confirmed in 1981: “The fact is that the Nazis never used the bodies of Jews, or for that matter anyone else, for the production of soap.”

In April 1990, professor Yehuda Bauer of Israel’s Hebrew University, regarded as a leading Holocaust historian, as well as Shmuel Krakowski, archives director of Israel’s Yad Vashem Holocaust center, confirmed that the human soap story is not true. Camp inmates “were prepared to believe any horror stories about their persecutors,” Bauer said. At the same time, though, he had the chutzpah to blame the legend on “the Nazis.”

In fact, blame for the soap story lies rather with individuals such as Simon Wiesenthal and Stephen Wise, organizations like the World Jewish Congress, and the victorious Allied powers, none of whom has ever apologized for promoting this vile falsehood.

Why did Bauer and Krakowski decide that this was the appropriate time to officially abandon the soap story? Krakowski himself hints that a large part of the motivation for this “tactical retreat” has been to save what’s left of the sinking Holocaust ship by throwing overboard the most obvious falsehoods. In the face of the growing Revisionist challenge, easily demonstrable falsehoods like the soap story have become dangerous embarrassments because they raise doubts about the entire Holocaust legend. As Krakowski put it: “Historians have concluded that soap was not made from human fat. When so many people deny the Holocaust ever happened, why give them something to use against the truth?”

–End Exerpt

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

The Diary of Anne Frank… Really?

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

–Excerpt from “The Anne Frank Diary Fraud”, by Brian Harring, TBR News.org – ( ) = (my personal notes)

Propaganda, as a weapon of psychological warfare is in even wider use today. Communists were masters of the art…

Such has been the effect, if not the deliberate intention of many who have promoted its distribution, of a book of popular appeal-The Diary Of Anne Frank. It has been sold to the public as the actual diary of a young Jewish girl who died in a Nazi concentration camp after two years of abuse and horror.

Many Americans have read the book or seen the movie version, and have been deeply moved by the real life drama it claims to present. But have we been misled in the belief that Anne Frank actually wrote this diary? And if so, should an author be permitted to produce a work of fiction and sell it to the world as fact, particularly one of such tremendous emotional appeal? (And which causes hate and political action in government?)

The Swedish journal Frio Ord published two articles commenting on The Diary of Anne Frank. A condensation of these articles appeared in the April 15, 1959 issue of Economic Council Letter, as follows:

“History has many examples of myths that live a longer and richer life than truth. and may become more effective than truth.

The Western world has for some years (been) made aware of a young Jewish girl through the medium of what purports to be her personally written story, “Anne Frank’s Diary.” Any informed literary inspection of this book has shown it to have been impossible as the work of a teenager.

A noteworthy decision of the New York Supreme Court confirms this point of view, in that the well known American writer, Meyer Levin, has been awarded $50,000 to be paid him by the father of Anne Frank as an honorarium for Levin’s work on the “Anne Frank Diary.”

Mr. Frank, in Switzerland, had promised to pay to prominent Jewish author, Meyer Levin, not less than $50,000 because he had used the literary creation of author Levin in toto, and represented it to his publisher and the public as his late daughter’s original work.

Inquiry of the County Clerk, New York County, as to the facts of the case referred to in the Swedish press, brought a reply on April 23, 1962, giving the name of a New York firm of lawyers as “attorneys for the respondent.” Reference was to ”The Dairy of Anne Frank 2203-58.”

A letter to this firm brought a response on May 4, 1962 that “Although we represent Mr. Levin in other matters, we had nothing to do with the Anne Frank case.”

On May 7, 1962, came the following reply from a member of a firm of New York lawyers to whom the original inquiry had been forwarded:

 

“I was the attorney for Meyer Levin in his action against Otto Frank and others. It is true that a jury awarded Mr. Levin $50,000 in damages, as indicated in your letter. That award was later set aside by the trial justice. Hon. Samuel C. Coleman, on the ground that the damages had not been proved in the manner required by law. The action was subsequently settled between the litigating parties, while an appeal from Judge Coleman’s decision was pending.

I am afraid that the case itself is not officially reported, so far as the trial itself, or even Judge Coleman’s decision, is concerned. Certain procedural matters were reported. both in 141 New York Supplement. Second Series 170. and in 5 Second Series 181. The correct file number in the New York County Clerk‘s office is 2241-1956 and the file is probably a large and full one which must include Judge Coleman’s decision. Unfortunately, our file is in storage and 1 cannot locate a copy of that decision as it appeared in the New York Law Journal early in the year 1960.”

The Diary Of Anne Frank was first published in 1952 and immediately became a bestseller. It has been republished in paperback, 40 printings. It is impossible to estimate how many people have been touched and aroused by the movie production.

Why has the trial involving the father of Anne Frank, bearing directly on the authenticity of this book, never been “officially reported”? In royalties alone, Otto Frank has profited richly from the sale of this book, purporting to depict the tragic life of his daughter. But is it fact, or is it fiction? Is it truth or is it propaganda? Or is it a combination of all of these? And to what degree does it wrongfully appeal to the emotions through a misrepresentation as to its origin?

School publications for years have recommended this book for young people, presenting it as the work of Anne Frank. Advertising in advance of the movie showing has played up the “factual” nature of the drama being presented. Do not writers of such editorials and promoters of such advertising, “fan the flames of hate” they rightly profess to deplore?

Many American Jews were shocked at the handling of the Eichmann case, the distortions contained in the book Exodus and its movie counterpart, but their protests have had little publicity outside of their own organ, Issues, by the American Council for Judaism. Others who have expressed the same convictions have been charged with anti-Semitism. (So in other words, a proper lawful investigation cannot be conducted into the truthfulness of the Anne Frank diary because it would be considered “holocaust denial” and anti-Semitic!) Yet it is to be noted that both Otto Frank and his accuser Meyer Levin, were Jewish, so a similar charge would hardly be applicable in pursuing this subject to an honest conclusion..

File number 2241-1956 in the New York County Clerk’s office should be opened to the public view and its content thoroughly publicized. Misrepresentation, exaggeration, and falsification has too often colored the judgment of good citizens. If Mr. Frank used the work of Meyer Levin to present to the world what we have been led to believe is the literary work of his daughter, wholly or in part, then the truth should be exposed.

To label fiction as fact is never justified nor should it be condoned.

Since actual period documentation does not exist in support of the Holocaust myth, it has always been incumbent on its supporters to create it.

Not only is the “Anne Frank” diary now considered to be a fake, so also is “The Painted Bird” by Jerzy Kosinski. This book, which is a mass of pornographic and sadistic imagery which, had it not been taken so seriously by the Jewish community, would be merely the pathetic manifestation of a self-serving and very sick person.

This was duly exposed as a shabby, though much revered (by the Jewish community) and quoted, fraud. When this was exposed, Kosinski committed suicide. Later, in Kosinski’s footsteps we find the next fiction entitled “Fragments” by a Swiss Protestant named Bruno Dosseker who spent the war in Switzerland as a young child. Dosseker posed as a very young Baltic Jewish concentration camp inmate named Binjamin Wilkomerski. This work consists of allegedly fragmented “memories” and is very difficult to read.

Dosseker became the poster boy for the Holocaust supporters and was lionized by the international Jewish community, reaping considerable profit and many in-house awards for his wonderful and moving portrayal of German brutality and sexual sadism.

Another book, allegedly by a Hungarian doctor, concerning his deportation from Budapest in 1944 and subsequent journey by “Death Train” to Auschwitz is another fraud. There was never such a doctor in Hungary during the period involved and the alleged route of the train from Budapest to Auschwitz did not exist…

Insofar as the Anne Frank diary is concerned, herewith is some background on Anne Frank, her family and her alleged Diary:

The Franks were upper class German Jews, both coming from wealthy families. Otto and his siblings lived on the exclusive Meronstrasse in Frankfurt. Otto attended a private prep school, and also attended the Lessing Gymnasium, the most expensive school in Frankfurt.

Otto attended Heidelberg University. After graduation he left for a long vacation in England.

In 1909, the 20 year old Otto went to New York City where he stayed with his relatives, the Oppenheimers.

In 1925 Anne’s parents married and settled in Frankfurt, Germany. Anne was born in 1929. The Frank’s family business included banking, management of the springs at Bad Soden and the manufacture of cough drops. Anne’s mother, the former Edith Holländer, was the daughter of a manufacturer.

In 1934, Otto and his family moved to Amsterdam where he bought a spice business, Opekta, which manufactures Pectin used in making household jellies.

On May 1940, after the Germans occupied Amsterdam Otto remained in that city while his mother and brother moved to Switzerland. Otto remained in Amsterdam where his firm did business with the German Wehrmacht. From 1939 to 1944, Otto sold Opeka, and Pectin, to the German army. Pectin was a food preservative, and a anti infectant balm for wounds and as a thickener for raising blood volume in blood transfusions. Pectin was used as an emulsifier for petroleum, gelatized gasoline for fire bombing. By supplying the Wehrmacht, Otto Frank became, in the eyes of the Dutch, a Nazi collaborator.

On July 6, 1942 Otto moved the Frank family into the so-called ‘Secret Annex’. The annex is a three story, mostly glass townhouse that shares a garden park with fifty other apartments.

While he was allegedly in hiding, Otto Frank still managed his business, going downstairs to his office at night and on weekends. Anne and the others would go to Otto’s office and listen to radio broadcasts from England.

The purported diary begins on June 12, 1942, and runs to December 5,1942 . It consists of a book that is six by four by a quarter inches. In addition to this first diary, Anne supplemented it with personal letters. Otto said Anne heard Gerrit Bolkestein in a broadcast say: ~ “Keep a diary, and he would publish after the war”, and that’s why Anne’s father claimed she rewrote her diaries second time in 1944.

In this second edition, the new writer changed, rearranged and occasionally combined entries of various dates.

When Anne allegedly rewrote the diaries, SHE USED A BALL POINT PEN, WHICH DID NOT EXIST IN 1945, and the book took on an extremely high literary standard, and read more like a professional documentary than a child’s diary. In Anne’s SECOND EDITION her writing style, and handwriting, suddenly matured.

The actual diary of Anne Frank contained only about 150 notes, according to The New York Times, of October 2 ,1955.

In 1944, German authorities in occupied Holland determined that Otto Frank had been swindling then via his extensive and very lucrative Wehrmacht contracts. The German police then raided his apartment attic, and the eight Jews were sent to Westerbork work camp and forced to perform manual labor. Otto himself was sent to Auschwitz.. Anne, her sister Margot, and her mother, subsequently DIED OF TYPHUS IN ANOTHER CAMP. (Remember, Red Cross records showed that most deaths were of this Typhus fever origin, and deaths in these work camps (not death camps!) happened when supplies were cut off by allied forces bombing of railroads.)

In 1945, after being liberated from German custody, Otto returned to Amsterdam, where he claimed he found Anne’s diary cleverly hidden in the Annex’s rafters. However, another version has a Dutch friend, Meip Geis finding Anne’s diary of fictional events, which she then gave to Otto Frank.

Otto took what he claimed were Anne’s letters and notes, edited them into a book, which he then gave to his secretary, Isa Cauvern, to review. Isa Cauvern and her husband Albert Cauvern , a writer, authored the first diary.

Questions were raised by some publishers as to whether Isa and Albert Cauvern, who assisted Otto in typing out the work used the original diaries or whether they took it directly from Mr. Frank’s personal transcription.

American author, Meyer Levin wrote the THIRD and final edition…

At the outset of World War II Levin made documentary films for the US Office of War Information and later worked in France as a civilian expert in the Psychological Warfare Division.

–End Excerpt

(After Levin’s “Anne Frank” writing, he went on to create other fictional movies about Jews in concentration camps, including “Compulsion, Eva, The Fanatic, and “The Stronghold”. But at least these were dramatic fictions, and not passed off as real-life documentary non-fiction, though that is the effect of fictional holocaust propaganda films.)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

So what do Jews think about the Goyim (non-Jews)?

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

“American Jews are actually being trained (by Zionists) since childhood to interact with non-Jews in a deceitful and arrogant manner, in coordination with each other, to emotionally destroy non-Jews and Israel critics in addition to wrecking their careers and interfering with their social relationships. This is actually deliberate, wicked, planned behavior motivated by a narcissistic self-righteous fury… The problem is that non-Jews are taught through emotional pressure and violence via the media and the school system to be very sensitive to Jewish suffering so when a Zionist becomes outraged at them for challenging their world view, the non-Jew really has to fight against his own inner self in a huge battle against his “inner Jew” making him feel inadequate and intimidated. But the Jew doesn’t care how much he or she hurts others. Jews only care about what’s good for the Jews… I once reduced a 50 year old man to hysterical sobbing tears because I told him gently and lovingly that Jews were not that unique. I just told him the Jews, like everyone else, have had good times and bad times. Times when they were slaughtered and other times when they slaughtered others. Just like everyone else. Guess what he did next? He emotionally abused me in an insulting way and then cut off all further communication. Jewish behavior is so predictable that it’s truly scary… If you mention cutting off the money or if you mention the possible compromise of living with Palestinians as equals in one state they become very angry and start using bullying tactics, unless they have some reason to fear you, in which case they shun you and complain about you to the authorities, try to get you arrested or try and destroy your career or social status through character assassination… Zionists all believe in the myth of “1000 years of Jewish suffering” and feel that the world owes them compensation for their ancestors’ “unique” suffering. It’s a criminally insane viewpoint. They cope with the contradictions between their belief that they are the good guys and what Jews are actually doing to their neighbors, both in the Middle East and in the US, by developing mental health issues. Most Zionists are functional schizophrenics.  Karin Friedemann, an ethnically Jewish anti-Zionist blogger.

DEFINING JEWISH ERETZ YISROEL (i.e. ‘Greater Israel’):

It is the dream of Zionist Jews, such as the Chabad, that Israel will one day extend from the Litani river in the North [i.e. Lebanon] to the river Nile in the south [i.e. Egypt] to the Euphrates in the West [i.e. Iraq])…

“If Zionism today means Greater Israel, not only am I a post-Zionist, I am an anti-Zionist. If Zionism is (the illegal settlements of) Netzarim and Kiryat Arba, I am an anti-Zionist. I do not accept the type of Zionism that took Judaism, with all its dazzling beauty, and turned it into the worship of trees and stones. When I look around today, my feeling is that Netzarim has become an altar, God has become a Moloch (an idol) and our children have become sacrifices: human sacrifices to terrible idol worship.” —Avrahum Burg, former Jewish Speaker of the Israeli Knesset (legislature of Israel).

“The (U.N.) General Assembly determines that Zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination.” United Nations General Assembly Resolution Number 3379, which was later revoked under massive Zionist pressure by Resolution Number 4686.

Facts≈

-92% of all the land inside the Green Line of Israel is reserved for Jews only; the rest of the land, approximately 8%, is for the non-Jewish people who comprise 20% of the total Israeli population. Therefore, it is a segregated, apartheid country…

– This is further evidenced by the fact that there are Jews-only by-pass roads that go to Jews-only settlements built on stolen Palestinian land.

– Non-Jews are never given permits to build inside Israel.

“Judaism is not a religion. Judaism is not a race. Judaism is not a people. Judaism is a strategy. Judaism is the Jews´ strategy to dominate non-Jews. Judaism is the ideology of the occupation, which is behind the occupation of Palestine. Judaism is the ideology and the strategy which is behind genocide and cruelties carried out by Jews in Palestine. The Palestinian people is today the most manifest victim of Judaism: the crime syndicate that calls itself a “religion”. Judaism is a declaration of war against us. But where are the real men in this country who are supposed to defend us? I dream of the day when there is no Israel… Israel exists for one purpose which is to function as a hideout for those who live in the same state of perpetual war against everyone else that Judaism dictates.” Mark Glenn, November 7th, 2006, “Judaism is Nobody’s Friend”

“What emerged for me, from the study of the first chapters (of Sefer Haranya, the central works of the Chabad ultra-Orthodox organization) was the discovery that the main stream of Jewish thought is permeated by genetic spiritual superiority of Jews over Gentiles, disconcertingly reminiscent of racist notions of our time… Living in Israel for the past twenty years… I have come to realize the vitality of Jewish racist notions, and I am more than ever convinced that the hold Judaism will have on this and future generation will be gravely impaired unless these notions are neutralized…”  Moshe Greenberg, Biblical scholar and Jewish author, from his book “A Problematic Heritage – The Attitudes Toward the Gentile in the Jewish Tradition: An Israeli Perspective”.

“My final, more general example is, if possible, even more shocking than the others. It concerns the attitude of the Hassidic movement (i.e. Orthodox Judaism) toward non-Jews. What then, are the views of this movement concerning non-Jews? As an example, let us take the famous Hatanya, fundamental book of the Habbad movement… According to this book, all non-Jews are totally satanic creatures “in whom there is absolutely nothing good.” Even a non-Jewish embryo is quantatatively different from a Jewish one. The very existance of a non-Jew is “inessential”, whereas all of creation was created solely for the sake of the Jews. —Jewish Professor Israel Shahak, from his extensively researched book, Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years“.

“We have to recognize that Jewish blood, and the blood of a goy, are not the same thing.” —Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg, New York Times, June 6, 1989.

“The difference between a Jewish soul and souls of non-Jews – all of them in all different levels – is greater and deeper than the difference between a human soul and the souls of cattle.”   —Rabbi Kook, “The Elder”, from the book, “Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel”.

“Even the best of the non-Jews should all be killed.” —Rabbi Simon ben Yahai, Talmud, Minor Tractates, Soferim 15, Rule 10.

“One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail.” —Rabbi Yaacov Perrin, New York Daily News, February 28, 1994, page 6.

“The difference between a Jewish and a non-Jewish person stems from the common expression: ‘Let us differentiate’. Thus, we do not have a case of profound change in which a person is merely on a superior level. Rather, we have a case of ‘let us differentiate’ between totally different species. This is what needs to be said about the body: the body of a Jewish person is of a totally different quality from the body of (members) of all nations of the world… A non-Jew’s entire reality is only vanity. The entire creation (of a non-Jew) exists only for the sake of the Jews.” —Rabbi Menachem Scheerson, quoted by Brownfield, in the Washington report of Middle East Affairs, March 2000, pages 105-106.

The genius of the Jews is to live off people; not off the land, nor off the production of commodities from raw materials, but off people. Let other people till the soil; the Jew, if he can, will live off the tiller. Let other people toil at trades and manufacture; the Jew will exploit the fruits of their work. That is his particular genius. If this genius be described as parasitic, the term would seem to be justifiedThe Jewish nation is the only nation that possesses the secrets of all the rest… there is no government in the world so completely at their service as America. ‘The British did this…the Germans did that’ when it was the International Jew who actually did it... The Americans are (now known as) a sordid, greedy, cruel people. Why? Because Jewish money-power is centered here.
—Henry Ford, Ford Motor Company, American Icon, creator of the assembly line, author of “The International Jew” from which this quote is taken.

“When a Jew, in America or in South Africa, talks to his Jewish companions about ‘our’ government, he means the government of Israel.” —David Ben-Gurion, Israeli Prime Minister.

“There’s little outward anti-Semitism of the kind one sees in the western world… it’s a much warmer society than one imagines from the outside…” —Jewish Magazine, on Iran’s culture.

“But would the world permit such ethnic cleansing? That depends on who does it and how quickly it happens. We possess several hundred atomic warheads and rockets and can launch them at targets in all directions, perhaps even at Rome. Most European capitals are targets for our air force. Let me quote General Moshe Dyan. ‘Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother.’ We shall try to prevent things from coming to that if at all possible. We have the capability to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that that will happen before Israel goes under.” —Israeli Professor Martin Van Creveldwhom advocates the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians and suggests that Israel should use Nuclear Blackmail to commit ethnic crimes.

“I believe they feel a sense of outrage against the United States. They identify with the Palestinian problem, they identify with people who oppose repressive regimes, and I believe then to focus their anger on the United States. —James Fitzgerald, FBI Special Agent, testifying at the 911 Commission public hearing, referring to the “terrorists whom attacked the United States. This testimony was not included in the 911 Commission’s report.

“By his own account, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed’s animus toward the United States stemmed not from his experiences there as a student, but rather from his violent disagreement with U.S. foreign policy favoring Israel.” —Page 147 of the 9/11 Commission Report.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

The Talmud and the Protocols of Zion

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

A quick word on the Talmud and the Protocols of Zion. I wont get into this here, though the Protocols are like a playbook and instruction manual on how to subvert, demoralize, and take control of a society… and the Talmud is the book used in lieu of the Torah for the un-Godly Zionist Jews regarding the treatment of and death wish for non-Jews. Instead, I have included a link to this wonderfully put together video in 12 parts (set to auto-play onYoutube) called “The Khazrian Conspiracy”. Consider these the “bibles” of Zionism. I highly recomend this for a deeper understanding of where the Zionist hatred of all non-Jews and the “Synagogue of Satan” stems from:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Haj-CJOERTs&feature=PlayList&p=E88E9051B41E1CCE&playnext_from=PL&playnext=1&index=17

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Christian-Israeli Alliance… WTF?

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Should Christians really support Israel? Zionist Israeli Jews have led the fight against prayer in school, to ban Christmas carols in school, and to ban Christian symbols on public land and even at the White House – while Jewish Menorahs and other Jewish symbols hang freely. Again a result of less than 2% of the population defiling the majority. Zionists have lead the fight for abortion, for radical feminism, for homosexual marriage, and all but have a monopoly on the porn industry. And most Christians don’t know that around 30% of Palestinians are indeed Christian, and are being harassed, beaten, imprisoned, made homeless, bombed, maimed, and killed for simply being Palestinian and/or Christian.

—> Israel Anti-Christian Law 5738-1977 = 5 years in prison for “witnessing for Christ”. —Israeli Law

“The Israeli Government is anti-Christian.” —Archbishop Manougian.

“Christian Clergy Spit Upon Daily In Jerusalem” headline in Haaretz, A Jewish Newspaper.

“Wearing a dark blue robe, sitting in St. James’ Church… Aghoyan said, ‘Every single Priest in this church has been spat on. It happens day and night.” — Jerusalem Post. ***Note that nuns are spat on as well, and that beating or killing women and children have no moral limitations as compared to men. The percentage of deaths for Palestinians is about 50% men, and 50% women and children.

—In a recorded phone conversation between Billy Graham and Richard Nixon—

Nixon: Wasn’t that a horrible thing, those Israelis shooting down that plane (another terrorist attack, this time killing over 100)? I mean to shoot down an unarmed 707, good heavens! That’s worse than what they did at the Olympics on the other side (Yes, another Israeli terrorist attack…).

Graham: Well, you see, there’s two other points. One is the front page of papers over the weekend carried the story that they’re talking about expelling all Christians from Israel.

Nixon: Oh, isn’t that nice?

Graham: And the second point is that the Jews in this country are just raising a big… And they are damning ‘Campus Crusade’ and damning so forth… they are going right after the church, and there’s a great deal of feeling beginning to rise…

Nixon: It happened in Spain, it’s happened in Germany, it’s happening – and now it’s going to happen in America if these people (Jews) don’t start behaving.

Graham: Well, you know, I told you one time that the Bible talks about two kinds of Jews. One is called “The Synagogue of Satan“. They’re the ones putting out the pornographic literature. They’re the ones putting out these obscene films.

Nixon: Like the thing in Time Magazine and then Newsweek.

Graham: It’s terrible… Ruth canceled both of them.

Nixon: Good for her, but…

Graham: …we wont take Time or Newsweek.

Nixon: I’ll tell you… this group – I think really they don’t deserve to live! …Newsweek is totally, it’s all run by Jews and dominated by them in their editorial pages. The New York Times, the Washington Post, totally Jewish too…

Graham: This stranglehold has got to be broken or this country is going to go down the drain.

Nixon: Do you believe that?

Graham: Yes sir.

Nixon: I can’t ever say it, but I believe it…


I went to a Jewish meeting and said that I would crawl to beg forgiveness.” —Billy Graham, in order to save his “ministry”, to the anti-Christian Zionist Jews, after the above conversation was made public.

“A church can become dysfunctional because a psychopath gains control, and it’s not always the pastor…soon the whole church goes insane” —Texe Marrs, Author, from “The Rise of the Illuminati Psychopaths and The Savage Horror of America’s Coming Gloom”

“(Christian churches are) going Jew! And their pastors demand to be called “Rabbi”. Their people are wearing Jewish garments and are into Yiddish songs and dancing in a circle. Meanwhile, some are working on a Christian Talmud, a book of laws and traditions for all Christians to obey.” —Texe Marrs, Author, quoted from his website – http://www.texemarrs.com/

“If we (Christians) hated the Jews, we wouldn’t want to see them in Heaven with us, would we? We’d want to see them go to Hell. But it’s the Christian who truly loves the Jews, who truly wants the best for them. And that’s why we preach to the Jews, as well as to Gentiles.” —Texe Marrs, Author, from his video “Thunder Over Zion”. His point being that this is a huge difference between the use of the word Goyim by Zionist Jews to describe non-Jews or “Gentiles” as cattle without a soul.

From the bible…

“I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the Synagogue of Satan.” —Revelation 2:9

“His Blood be on us and our children!”    —Matthew 27:25, depicting Jews yelling about crucifying Jesus.

“And no man spoke of him for fear of the Jews.” —John 7:13, referring to Jews killing Christians.

“For you suffered as your own countrymen did from the Jews, who killed both the Lord Jesus and the prophets, and drove us out, and displease God and oppose all mankind. Who keep us from speaking to the Gentiles that they might be saved. But God’s wrath has come upon them at last!” — Thessalonians 2:14-16.

“What exactly is so scandalous (about the Talmud)? How about Jesus punished in Hell for eternity by being made to sit in a cauldron of boiling excrement?” —Publishers Weekly, referring to the Talmud.

Good, I- I hope the Jews did kill Christ. I’d do it again! I’d fucking do it again in a second!” — Sara Silverman, Jewish Zionist comedian, in stand up routine.

“The only reason that Jews are in pornography is that we think that Christ sucks.” —Jewish Zionist, Al Goldstein, publisher of ‘Screw’ magazine.

“Pornography thus becomes a way of defiling Christian culture… (Porn kings are motivated by a Jewish) atavistic hatred of Christian authority: they are trying to weaken the dominant culture in America by moral subversion…”   —Jewish Zionist Professor Nathan Abrams, in the ‘Jewish Intelectual Quarterly’, bragging about the Jewish domination of the porn industry.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Do Jews really own the media and run Hollywood?

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

“Four of the largest five entertainment giants are now run or owned by Jews. Rupert Murdoch’s NewsCorp is the only gentile (non-Jew) holdout. However, Rupert is as pro-Israel as any Jew, probably more so.” —The Los Angeles Jewish Times, Oct. 29, 1999. Also, Murdoch’s NewsCorp has Jewish Zionist Peter Chernin as its President and CEO. All of these companies were started originally by Gentiles, and infiltrated incrementally by Rothschild’s Zionists.

“The Jews Control Hollywood – So What?” —Cover of Moment, “The Jewish Magazine for the ’90s”, Aug. 1996 edition. Authored by Zionist Jew Michael Medved.

“It makes no sense at all to try to deny the reality of Jewish power and prominence in popular culture. Any list of the most influential production executives at each of the recognizably Jewish studios will produce a heavy majority of recognizably Jewish names… The famous Disney organization, which was founded by Walt Disney, a gentile Midwesterner who allegedly harbored anti-Semitic attitudes, now features Jewish personnel in nearly all its most powerful positions… Men and women of Jewish background enjoy a vastly disproportionate – if not dominant – influence in Hollywood. (even studios which were bought out by the Japanese Sony Corp. and by the Australian Jew Rupert Murdoch, still had to hire) …A Yiddish team of long-time industry leaders in all the most powerful positions. When Mitsushita took over MCA-Universal, they did nothing to undermine the unquestioned authority of Universal’s legendary – and all-Jewish management triad of Lew Wasserman, Sid Scheinberg and Tom Pollack…” (Medved further writes that most of today’s movie moguls graduated from Ivy League colleges) “…where Jews are vastly over-represented – just as they are in Hollywood..”

For instance, Jewish students equal about 23% of total students at Harvard University, equal to the number of whites. Remember, we are talking about less than 2% of the American population here compared to 75%.

continued… “Poll after poll, taken over the past 10 years, shows that the public believes this industry is more firmly associated with Jews than any other business in the world. That it is almost universally viewed as a destructive force in our society should be of concern. The combined weight of so many Jews in one of America’s most lucrative and important industries gives the Jews of Hollywood a great deal of political power. They are a major source of money for Democratic candidates. The industry’s informal patriarch, MCA chairman Lew Wasserman, wields tremendous personal clout in state and national politics. So do Barbara Streisand, Norman Lear and others.” —Jewish Zionist Michael Medved, Moment, Aug. 1996 edition.

“Hollywood is run by Jews – it is owned by Jews! (The Jews have slandered every other racial group) …but are ever so careful to insure that there is never any negative image of the Kike (in the media).” Marlon Brando, on the Larry King Live show, April 5th 1996, to Larry King. For this, Marlon Brando was labeled “anti-Semitic” and forced to apologize to the Jews running the Simon Wiesenthal Holocaust Tourist Center in Los Angeles.

“…it just shows how dumb America has gotten. Jews totally run Hollywood.” —Zionist Jew Joel Stein, Los Angeles Times – Opinion section, “How Jewish Is Hollywood?”

continued… “I don’t care if Americans think (Jews) we’re running the news media, Hollywood, Wall Street, or the Government. I just care that we get to keep running them… How deeply Jewish is Hollywood? When the studio chiefs took out a full page ad in the Los Angeles Times a few weeks ago to demand that the Screen Actors Guild settle its contract, the open letter was signed by:

-The Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers:

– Peter Chernin, (Jewish Zionist) Chairman & CEO, the Fox Group

– Brad Grey (Jewish Zionist), Chairman and CEO, Paramout Pictures Corp.

– Robert A. Iger (Jewish Zionist),President & CEO, The Walt Disney Company

– Michael Lynton (Dutch Jewish Zionist), Chairman & CEO, Sony Pictures Entertainment

– Barry M. Mayer (Jewish Zionist), Chairman & CEO, Warner Bros.

– Leslie Moonves (Jewish Zionist whose great uncle was the first prime minister of Israel), Chairman & CEO, CBS Corp.

– Harry Sloan (Jewish Zionist), Chairman & CEO, MGM

– Jeff Zucker (Jewish Zionist), President & CEO, NBC Universal”

Continued… “If either of the Weinstein brothers had signed, this group would have not only the power to shut down all film production but to form a minyan (Minimum Adult Jews required for a communal religious service) with enough Fiji water on hand to fill a mikvah (a ritual purification and cleansing bath that Orthodox Jews take on certain occasions (as before Sabbath or after menstruation). The person they were yelling at in that ad was SAG President Alan Rosenberg (Jewish Zionist). The scathing rebuttal to this ad was written by entertainment super-agent Ari Emanuel (Israeli Jewish Zionist).” —Joel Stein, Los Angeles Times – Opinion, “How Jewish Is Hollywood?”

“The assertion that Jews “control” Hollywod, the media, banking and finance, among other things, is an anti-Semitic canard which dates back more than 70 years to an anti-Jewish campaign waged in the 1920’s…” —Abe Boxman, Zionist Jew and head of the Anti-Defamation League, in an ADL Publication entitled “Alleged Jewish ‘Control’ of the American Motion Picture Industry”. The ADL is a Zionist, pro-Israeli, and extremely powerful lobby, which labels anything anti-Israel or anti-Zionist as racist and anti-Semitic, despite the fact that Zionist Israelis are not Semitic, but in fact Khazarian in origin and are occupying stolen Palestinian land. Thus, any healthy information or debate is stopped dead in its tracks and immediately labeled racist or politically incorrect.

“As a fan, I thank you. As your producer, I thank you. As a member of the Jewish tribe, I thank you… Are you kidding me? This movie is a fucking Jewish wet dream.” —Lawrence Bender, co-producer of Inglorious Basterds, and Zionist extremist; to Quentin Tarantino.

(Bender is) “…a prominent liberal and pro-Israel activist. Inglorious Basterds brings together his greatest passions, movies, politics, and a cherished Jewish identity. Bender has leveraged his political clout to support causes he cares about…” —The Jewish Journal, August 18, 2009, article titled “The Other Avenger: Tarantino’s Producer Lawrence Bender”. This movie, by the way, is disgusting, extremely and unessesarily violent, and revolting, which is apparently the cause he cares about as it subverts society and Christianity, and spreads Holocaust lies.

“I have to tell you how exited I am to take this movie to Israel…” —Lawrence Bender, co-producer of Inglorious Basterds, and Zionist extremist. Imagine the hatred being spread in these movies, and the violence that they will inspire Israeli Jews to inflict on innocent Palestinians, their only outlet for this type of hate-filled propaganda.

“Jewish (torture) Porn… It’s almost a deep sexual satisfaction of wanting to beat Nazi’s to death, an orgasmic feeling. My parents are very strong about ‘Holocaust education‘.” —Eli Roth, kingpin of the “torture porn” genre, Jewish Zionist actor/writer/director, referring to Inglorious Basterds. Roth won awards for “Hostel”, by Hollywood’s Zionist elite, who praise him for his work in most Jewish-owned celebrity magazines. Hostel was a movie that made me quit movies for a while!

…Schindler’s List, winner of seven Academy Awards, seen by millions and used as a teaching tool since it appeared in 1993… Today it seems that films about the Holocaust and events surrounding it abound. Almost with a bizarre regularity they reach the big screen in twos or threes… Putting a new twist on the Holocaust genre for a new time and a new audience was none other than the renowned filmmaker Quentin Tarantino. While he opens his Inglourious Basterds with a scene repeated untold times during the Holocaust – a Jewish family hidden by a Christian family is discovered by a Nazi commandant and executed – the film morphs into an allegory about good and evil and the no-holds-barred efforts to defeat the evil personified by Hitler, his henchmen and his Nazi regime. Employing drama, comedy and romance with the quintessential Quentin Tarantino touch, the film is entertaining, yet thought-provoking. Hopefully the millions who see it will understand the horrors of the Holocaust and echo my view of “if only it were true!” Like its predecessors Schindler’s List and Life is Beautiful, Inglorious Basterds should be recognized with an Academy Award.” —Abe Foxman, National Director of the Anti-Defamation League, Huffington Post online. February 18, 2010. Apparently, violence, horror, torture and blood-letting of non-Jews is not considered defamation, according to the Anti-Defamation League.

Inglorious Basterds was nominated for 8 Academy Award nominations. This is more or as many as some of the greatest films ever made: Gone With The Wind, Ben Hur, Titanic, The Lord of The Rings, Inglorious Basterds… one of these doesn’t fit… that is unless you are a Jewish Zionist who loves “torture porn” and are the one doing the judging…

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

OK… but surely they don’t control our government???

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

“You know very well, and the stupid Americans know equally well, that we control their government, irrespective of who sits in the White House. You see, I know it and you know it that no American president can be in a position to challenge us even if we do the unthinkable. What can they (Americans) do to us? We control congress, we control the media, we control show biz, and we control everything in America. In America you can criticize God, but you can’t criticize Israel…”Israeli spokeswoman, Tzipora Menache

“Future historians will record that the Jews replaced the old Protestant elite, who had run the city (of New York)… until their power was finally shattered by the cultural metamorphosis of 1968…” —Jewish writer David Samuels, New York Magazine.

“For perhaps another generation, an optimistic forecast, the Jewish community is thus in a position where it will be able to divide and conquer (Americans and Christians) and enter into selective coalitions that support our agenda.” —Jewish Zionist Stephen Steinlight, former head of National Affairs for the American Jewish Committee (AJC), the most powerful Jewish organization in America.

Idiot Savant, George W. Bush…

“Our war on terror begins with Al Qaeda. But it does not end there. It will not end until every terrorist group of global reach has been found, stopped, and defeated

Let me just pause here and say… “Hey asshole! What about Israel?”

“…Americans are asking, ‘Why do they hate us?’ They hate what they see right here in this (congressional) chamber – a democratically elected government…

Oh, sorry again… but shouldn’t we be electing our president in a republic form of government, as per the constitution you pretend to follow, as opposed to the communist platform of democracy?

“…Their leaders are self-appointed.”

Damn Bush Jr… you make it really hard not to interrupt! Didn’t you appoint all of our real leaders during your term, most of them Israeli Zionist Jews with duel-citizenship (about 32 of them in fact), including your Chief of Staff, Secretary of Defence, Treasury Secretary, Secretary of State, Supreme Court Justices, etc, etc, etc…?

“…They hate our freedoms. Our freedom of religion. Our freedom of speech. Our freedom to vote (rigged) and assemble (by permit) and disagree (without hate-speech) with each other…” —Crookedly and unconstitutionally “elected” President of the United States (corporation) George W. Bush, September 20, 2001, addressing a joint session of Zionist controlled congress, and also the American people through the Zionist controlled media.


“If the attackers simply hated freedom, why did they not attack Switzerland or Iceland, the oldest democracies on Earth? The primary motivation of those who attack us is because the American government supports Israel’s conquest, ethnic cleansing, occupation, torture, and murder (of) the Palestinian people – as shown in the recent carnage in Gaza. The establishment does not want the American people to understand this.” —David Duke, about 9/11 and who was responsible. Naturally, David Duke is labeled as anti-Semitic.

“…between 50% and 70% of political campaign contributions for President come from Jewish sources.” —Washington Post, January 21, 1993.

“In presidential elections, Democratic candidates depend on Jewish supporters to supply as much as 60 percent of the money raised from private sources.” —Washington Post, March 13, 2003. A major source of republican funds come from the same sources.


Democrat Obama’s top presidential campaign contributors were Jewish Zionist owned Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan Chase was third, and Citigroup (Citibank) was fifth.

Inversely, Republican McCain’s top presidential campaign contributors were also Merill Lynch at number one, Citigroup at number two, Goldman Sachs at number three, Morgan Stanley at number four, and JP Morgan Chase at number six.

So we must ask why the same Zionist Jewish controlled banks are supporting both sides of the political spectrum? The answer is simple… To buy a presidential candidate whom will then appoint tens and hundreds of unelected officials to his cabinet, ensuring a Zionist Jewish run American government without any representatives of the actual American population. Throughout history, bankers have been funding governments and wars on both sides. This ensures compliance with the money masters – the international banking elite.

This represents a complete take-over of American foreign policy, and indeed politics and the government itself, by Jewish Zionist extremists and those who support them, either willingly or because they have to be in politics without being ostracized by the Zionist run media.

“We, The Jewish People, Control America”   Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert

“The most powerful lobby in the United States congress is AIPAC; the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. Now get that… Doesn’t it seem odd that the most powerful lobby in our U.S. congress is for a foreign country?” —David Duke, former U.S. House of Representatives, Louisiana.

“The U.S. has no longer a government of goyim (non-Jews)… In the National Security Council, 7 out of 11 top staffers are Jews. Clinton had especially placed them in the most sensitive junctions in the U.S. security and foreign administrations.” —Major Israeli Daily, Maariv, September 2, 1994, article entitled “The Jews Who Run Clinton’s Court”.

“Foreign policy gets very complicated. When you take certain actions to support a friend – the security of Israel – as we did, it has consequences. No question about it.” —Lee H. Hamilton, 9/11 commission member, about U.S. Israel foreign policy relating to 9/11.

“We can still remember the smell of Auschwitz and Treblinka… next time we will take all of you with us!” —Israeli official, as quoted by Seymour M. Hersh’s “The Samson Option”.

“The only two non Jews in the communist conspiracy were Chambers and Hiss. Every other one was a Jew and it raised hell with us.” President Richard Nixon, 1971, White House released by the National Archives in 1999, I.E. Whittaker Chambers and Alger Hiss, Reference in N.Y. Times, Oct. 7, 1999 and Newsweek, Oct. 18, 1999, p. 30)

And lets not forget who runs our country through the manipulation and control of the American dollar. Chairman Ben Shalom Bernake and vice-chairman Donald Kohn, as well as former chairman Alan Greenspan are all extreme Zionist Jews. And remember, they are the ones deciding which of the Zionist – and the few non-Zionist controlled banks get the “bail-out” money from the American Taxpayers. This “bail-out” is nothing more than theft, and a consolidation effort of the worlds international Zionist banks… Zionists giving American money to Zionists.

≈Forced Equality≈

The New York Times has been a powerful and influential newspaper for 114 years, perhaps the mot powerful. Though it was founded in the 1950’s by American’s of white European decent, it’s had a succession of all Zionist Jewish owners and CEO’s since 1896, as follows… Adolf Ochs, Arthur Sulzberger, Orvil Dryfoos, A.O. Sulzberger, and Arthur Sulzberger Jr. So much for equal opportunity or fair and ballanced reporting, eh?

(headline) “New York Times Pays Execs Extra To Hire Minorities And Women Instead Of White Guys” (story) “Another fun fact from the New York Time’s proxy: Senior executives can get an extra bonus for hiring minorities and women instead of white guys. The [Compensation] Committee also retained the discretion to “increase or decrease the individual component of the total bonus paid to each executive by up to 10% based on the continuing development of a diverse work force, including the inclusion of diverse candidates in hiring processes and the demonstration of personal commitment to diversity through participation in diversity-related activities, such as mentoring and sponsorship of affinity groups.” —Business Insider, The Wire

“The New York times… revealed, a bizarre bonus for hiring minorities… a bonus structure designed to diversify the work force, by rewarding executives who hire minorities:… “regional media group” CEO Michael Golden… received an extra 5% through this structure.” —Huffington Post

“God gave you your skin color, so why not use it to your advantage?” —The Reverend Jesse Jackson, about Affirmative Action…

OK, I know he’s not Jewish, but he supports the racist bills perpetrated by Zionists, which allow less qualified minorities to get a job or promotion over the most qualified applicant – regardless of race or color – while subverting the black populace in America by making education less of a priority. In other words, the same Zionists who have purposefully subverted and dumbed down the public school system are destroying the need and will to get an education for the black minority, while making whites in America wonder, “what good is an education with quota laws?”. A political reverend without a congregation or a church should really not be trusted, and that goes for all evangelists, white or black.

With the Los Angeles parking police department being a private corporation based out of New York City, who hires minorities only with no constitutional oath or police training, the inequality of forced equality is just another subversive tactic to destroy our country’s pride, productivity, education, and work ethic.

One must look at who supports these Affirmative Action laws… a Zionist infiltrated U.S. Government and a Fortune 500 base of corporations that are Zionist owned, operated, beholden, or influenced. Affirmative Action is not a civil rights tool used to benefit minorities, but a tool of absolute manipulation and destruction of American society. It is neither Constitutional (I.E. “all men are created equal”) nor Democratic (I.E. “majority rules”).

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Israeli thoughts on war, murder, Gentiles, Arabs, and Palestine…

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

“(Jews, he himself) doesn’t believe in western morality… The only way to fight a moral war is the Jewish way: destroy their holy sites. Kill men, women, and children (and cattle).” —Manis Friedman, famous Jewish Rabbi.

“Even the best of the non-Jews should all be killed.” —Rabbi Simon ben Yahai, Talmud, Minor Tractates, Soferim 15, Rule 10.

“One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail.” —Rabbi Yaacov Perrin, New York Daily News, February 28, 1994, page 6.

“Israel tortures at least 500 Palestinians a month. (6000 per year)” (Paraphrase) —Jewish Alan Greenberg, New York Times

“Almost 50% of (Palestinian) detainees who were arrested in raids or at random were beaten by the army or police before they were handed over to the Shin Bet for interrogation. The prisoners were interrogated for 5 to 10 hours a day for an average of 35 days, and spent most of their time in tiny cells in solitary confinement. They were effectively starved and their only exercise was the walk from the cell to the interrogation room during which they were shackled, handcuffed and blindfolded.” —Report compiled by Israeli human rights group B’Tselem…

This might explain the Zionist influenced U.S. military doctrine of torture utilized on Arab prisoners in American prison camps like Abu Gharib, which are blatant war crimes and completely against Geneva conventions… There was a time when America was idealistically and morally opposed to these tactics. But now America is under Zionist rule.

“I will confess it, at least, like thousands of other typical Jewish kids of my generation, I was reared as a Jewish nationalist, even a quasi-separatist (he was raised in America). Every summer for two months for 10 formative years during my childhood and adolescence I attended a Jewish summer camp. There, each morning, I saluted a foreign flag, dressed in a uniform reflecting its colors, sang a foreign national anthem, learned a foreign language, learned foreign folk songs and dances, and was taught that Israel was the true homeland (for American Jews)… I was taught the superiority of my people to the gentiles who had oppressed us. We were taught to view non-Jews as untrustworthy outsiders; people from whom sudden gusts of hatred might be anticipated, people less sensitive, intelligent, and moral than ourselves. We were also taught that the lesson of our dark history is that we could rely on no one.” —Jewish Zionist Stephen Steinlight, former head of National Affairs for the American Jewish Committee (AJC), the most powerful Jewish organization in America.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

So what can we, the 98% Gentiles and 1.9% Jews do?

Boycott Zionist Israel and the corporations that support it!

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

In order to give you an idea of what a boycott of Israel (and Zionism) would entail, here are some of the deeply ingrained corporations that most of us take for granted, which are run by and supported by Israel and/or Zionist sympathizers:

On the internet – Google, Youtube, Facebook, MySpace, Wikipedia (or as I like to call it… do-it-yourself history), Yahoo, Ebay, and many others…


Estee Lauder – Ronald Lauder – the billionaire Estee Lauder Cosmetics magnate, was the chairman of New York Governor George Pataki’s commission on privatization. He is the key individual who lobbied for the privatization of the World Trade Center, and also got the former Stewart Air Force Base to become privatized. Oddly, but probably not coincidentally, the flight paths of flight 175 and flight 11 converged directly over this airport on 9/11. Zionist Jew Ronald Lauder is active in the following organizations: Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, Jewish National Fund, World Jewish Congress, American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee, Anti-Defamation League, and the Jewish Theological Seminary. Ronald Lauder was elected president of the World Jewish Congress on June 10, 2007. Lauder founded a school for the Mossad in Herzliya, for which Israel called the Lauder School of Government Diplomacy and Strategy. He is the key Sayan involved in the preparation of 9/11.

Sayan (Hebrew: helpers, assistants) is a term used to describe a network of Jews living outside of Israel who volunteer to provide assistance to the Israeli Mossad.


AOL Time Warner – AOL allocates 30% of its investment portfolio to Israel.

“… We would also challenge them to consider that AOL allocates 30% of its investment portfolio in Israel. Does that effect how CNN reports on the Israeli/Palestinian conflict? At NileMedia, we think it does. The “spin” wizards at CNN, TIME and AOL are not in the journalism business.” —Nile Media

In 1998, Mr. Ted Leonsis, CEO of AOL studios (a business unit of AOL) received the Jubilee Award by the Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu. This is the highest tribute ever awarded by the “State of Israel” in recognition of those individuals and organizations, that through their investments and trade relationships, have done the most to strengthen the Israeli economy.

Starbucks Coffee – Howard Schultz, the chairman of Starbucks is an active Zionist. In 1998 he was honored by the Jerusalem Fund of Aish HaTorah with ‘The Israel 50th Anniversary Friend of Zion Tribute Award’ for his services to the Zionist state in “playing a key role in promoting close alliance between the United States and Israel”. “I congratulate Aish HaTorah for what they’re doing, where they’re doing it, and for whom they’re doing it.” The Jerusalem Fund of Aish HaTorah sponsors Israeli military arms fairs chaired by the butcher of Jenin – General Shaul Mofaz, Israel’s Minister of Defense. It aims to “strengthen the special connection between the American, European and Israeli defense industries” and “to showcase the newest Israeli innovations in defense”. It produces pro-Zionist propaganda material for Israel.

Star-bucks  =  Star of David + Dollars  =  Dollars for Israel.

Coca-Cola Company (and it’s over 3,000 beverages) – From 1966 Coca-Cola has been a staunch supporter of Israel. In 1997 the Government of Israel Economic Mission honored Coca-Cola at the Israel Trade Award Dinner for its continued support of Israel for the last 30 years and for refusing to abide by the Arab League boycott of Israel. Every year Coca Cola bankrolls the American-Israel Chamber of Commerce Awards which honors companies that have contributed most to the Israeli economy. In 2009 a Coca-Cola sponsored award went to Israel’s Lobby AIPAC for its lobbying of the Senate to reject of the UN call for “immediate ceasefire” and endorse the continuation of the Israel military assault on Gaza. In 2008 Coca-Cola tasked the Israeli venture capital Challenge Fund to locate suitable investments in Israel with a promise of “a blank check”. This agreement is exceptional in the Israeli venture capital industry. In September 2009 Coca-Cola hosted a special reception at the Coca-Cola world headquarters to honor Brigadier-General Binyamin Ben-Eliezer, Israel’s ex-Minister of Defense currently Minister of Industry, Trade & Labor. Brigadier-General Binyamin Ben-Eliezer is a wanted war criminal. According to Dr.Aryeh Yitzhaki, a mainstream Israeli military historian, the IDF killed around a 1000 Egyptian POW’s during the Six-Day War. Ben-Eliezer’s “Shaked unit” was responsible for one-third of those murders. This is to say nothing of the ecological and water depletion problems Coca-Cola casues in third world countries leading to crop failure and livestock and human malnutrition and starvation.

Another top movie on my list explaining water supply and depletion for profit at the expense of the local people is called “Flow”. And once again It is a must watch – http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4548621530723720885#

Disney Corporation (Pixar, Marvel, Theme Parks) – Robert Alan “Bob” Iger, president and CEO of Disney, is a Zionist Jew. He was named president of the company in 2000, and later succeeded Zionist Jew Michael Eisner as chief executive in 2005. Iger oversaw the acquisitions of Pixar in 2006 and of Marvel Entertainment in 2009. Walt Disney’s Millennium exhibition at the Epcot Center in Florida depicts Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. Jerusalem is an illegally occupied city according to international law (UN resolution 242, 237, and 405) and can never be the capital of Israel. Of the 8 million dollars it cost to set up the Epcot exhibition, Israel contributed 1.8 million and worked with Disney to develop its content. This is part of Israels campaign to physically “Judaise” Jerusalem and mentally condition the world into accepting its claims over Jerusalem. Interestingly, Walt Disney was known to be an anti-Zionist!

McDonald’s Restaurants – Zionist Jack M. Greenberg, chairman and CEO of McDonald’s, is an honorary director of the American-Israel Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Inc., of Metropolitan Chicago. According to the Chicago Jewish Community Online (website of the Jewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago), McDonald’s Corporation whose global headquarters is based just outside Chicago is a major corporate partner of the Jewish United Fund and Jewish Federation. Through its Israel Commission, the Jewish United Fund “works to maintain American military, economic and diplomatic support for Israel; monitors and, when necessary, responds to media coverage of Israel”. In the Jewish United Fund’s outreach program, they pay for Christian leaders and American high school kids to visit Israel and be fed Zionist lies. McDonald’s entered the Israeli market in 1993 and now has 80 restaurants across Israel, providing employment to some 3000 Israelis.

Home Depot – Bernard Marcus, Founder and Co-Chairman of the Board, is an active Zionist. He is on the board of directors of Emet, the Pro-Israel Media “War Room” whose function is to ensure that all media in the US stays biased in favor of Israel. “A group of American business and political leaders are building a pro-Israel media “war room” in Washington, D.C. The group will be called “Emet” – which in Hebrew means “truth.” Emet will try to address biased media coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and also make the case that the conflict, while serious and important, pales in comparison to the larger Geo-strategic threat posed to the United States and the West by Iran and Iraq, both of whom are trying to build and/or acquire weapons of mass destruction (a blatent lie). Funding Emet is Leonard Abramson; he sold U.S. Healthcare to Aetna in the mid-1990s for $8.9 billion. Abramson has recruited a powerful board of directors, including Bernie Marcus, founder of Home Depot; Les Wexner, founder of The Limited; Edgar Bronfman Sr., who once owned Seagram’s; and Lou Ranieri, a major Wall Street player who now co-owns one of Israel’s largest banks. Also joining the board are Jeane Kirkpatrick, former U.S. Ambassador to the UN, and Jack Kemp.”


News Corporation (Fox News, Sky TV Network, National Geographic, The Wall Street Journal, The Sun, The Times, The New York Post, and on and on and on…) – Extreme Zionist Jew and propaganda master Rupert Murdoch is the world’s leading publisher of English-language newspapers, and its diversified global operations include the production and distribution of motion pictures and television programming; television, satellite and cable broadcasting; the publication of newspapers, magazines and books; the production and distribution of promotional and advertising products and services; and the development of digital broadcasting. The Company publishes more than 175 different newspapers – the same news from the same source! News Corp. invests heavily in Israel, and was one of three US companies that was praised for their support of Israel at the America-Israel Friendship League Partners for Democracy Awards dinner (25th June 2001). Murdoch himself co-chaired the dinner.

Intel – One of the biggest supporters of Israel. Their very first development center outside the U.S. was opened in Haifa in 1974. Since then they have continued pouring investment in to Israel. By year 2000, they employ over 4000 Israelis. Exports from their Lachish-Qiryat Gat plant in Israel (opened Feb 99) total $3 million a day at peak capacity , or approximately $1 billion a year. Al-Awda (Palestine Right to Return Coalition) have pointed out that the Intel plant at “Qiryat Gat” is built on land Israel confiscated from Palestinian villages of Iraq al Manshiya. Iraq al Manshiya was a village of 2000 people living in 300 houses with two mosques and one school. The original Palestinian inhabitants were terrorized out of the village and then the whole village was razed to the ground to prepare the way for the new Israeli settlement of Qiryat Gat. Today the remaining population from Iraq al Manshiya is still not allowed to return. Legal action against Intel for building on looted land is being considered. Intel’s investments in apartheid education in Israel: “Intel invests in the promotion of higher education in Israel. In addition to scholarships for students, it allocates considerable resources to funding research and purchasing laboratory equipment.” http://www.intel.com/intel/community/israel/education.htm

A boycott of Intel would probably mean not using or buying the computer you are using to read this, and having to build one yourself with anti-Zionist chips, motherboards, adapters, controllers, network products, wireless components, embedded products, and finally buying software that wasn’t developed on any of Intel’s Software Development Tools! Good luck with that!!!

IBM – IBM invests heavily in Israel. Lawrence Ricciardi, IBM senior vice-president and general counsel, who noted that his company employs 1,700 people in Israel, said in an interview with the Jerusalem Post, “This wedge of land and the huge ideals it represents are very important to IBM.” IBM was one of three US companies that was praised at the America-Israel Friendship League Partners for Democracy Awards dinner (25th June 2001) hosted by Sharon. In May 2002 the Israel-America Chamber of Commerce awarded IBM the Ambassador’s Award “in recognition of its outstanding contribution to the development of the Israeli high-tech industry and to advancing trade between the U.S. and Israel.

This is almost humorous when one considers that IBM is quite famous for knowingly manufacturing the hole-punch cards and punching machines used by the Nazis in the World War 2 labor camps to document and keep track of their Jewish prisoners. This would be like creating bar code tattoos for todays FEMA prison camps.

“Don’t tell us what you are doing, and don’t ask us any questions.”   —cable message to all of IBM’s Eastern Europe subsidiaries, October 1941, as sudden new trading with the enemy regulations were about to go into force as America was about to enter the war.

“The fact that Hollerith equipment manufactured by (IBM’s German unit) Dehomag was used by the Nazi administration has long been known and is not new information… This information was published in 1997 in the IEEE Annals of the History of Computing and in 1998 in Washington Jewish Week.” —IBM representative Carol Makovich, writing in an e-mail interview by Edwin Black while researching his book “IBM and the Holocaust”.

Danone (Dannon) – In 1998, Mr. Franck Riboud, on behalf of Danone received the Jubilee Award by the Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu. This is the highest tribute ever awarded by the “State of Israel” in recognition of those individuals and organizations, that through their investments and trade relationships, have done the most to strengthen the Israeli economy. The Danone Institute, an R & D facility, was established in Israel in July 1998.

In order to boycott Danone (Dannon), you would have to stop eating their yogurt and other dairy products or anything from Strauss Dairy, all of HP Foods including Lea & Perrins sauces, and Evian and Volvic bottled water… among other things.

Nestle’ – This Swiss company owns 50.1% of Israeli food maker Osem Investments. In December of 2000 Nestle’ announced that it will invest millions of dollars to operate the new R&D center in Israel. In 1998, Mr. Peter Brabeck-Letmathe on behalf of Nestle, received the Jubilee Award by the Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu. This is the highest tribute ever awarded by the “State of Israel” in recognition of those individuals and organizations, that through their investments and trade relationships, have done the most to strengthen the Israeli economy.

To boycott Nestle would be extremely difficult. You’d have to stop using L’Oreal products. It would mean no more Kit Kats, Baby Ruths, or Butterfingers. No Nesquick or Nescafe’ for breakfast. No sweets or cookies from Libby’s. No Carnation products of any kind. No Buitoni oils, pastas, or sauces. And then there is the bottled water… Arrowhead, Poland Spring, Perrier, San Pellegrino (Perrier’s competitor – LOL), Calistoga (San Pellegrino’s competitor – LOL2), Crystal Geyser, Ice Mountain, Zephyr Hills, Ozarka, Pure Life/Pureza Vital, Deer Park, Aquapod, Nestle’ Brand, and others… Essentially, all bottled water brands are Zionist Israel friendly. And why not, they are selling something that flows freely to a bunch of us nincompoops who pay top dollar for somewhat filtered tapwater!

I could go on, but it would just make you feel more helpless and totally dependent on Zionist and Israel suporting products and services…

…Oh, what the hell!

Here is a short and quite incomplete list:

Porn, ABC, NBC, CBS, FOX, HBO, CNN, MSNBC, Hollywood (all mainstream media, movie, and newspaper outlets), Caterpillar, Est’ee Lauder, Johnson and Johnson, Revlon, Kimberly-Clark (Kleenex and Huggies), Apax Partners (Jonny Rockets, Sunglass Hut), Delta Galil (Barbie, Victoria’s Secret, GAP, Banana Republic, Structure, J. Crew, JC Penny, DKNY, Ralph Lauren, Hugo Boss), Timberland, Siemens, Sara Lee (oh, not the cookies!), The Limited, Nokia, Motorola, AT&T (and most phone companies) Bank of America, Wells Fargo, J.P. Morgan Chase… Oh heck, let’s just say all major banks, shall we? Chevron, BP, Exxon… Ok, I suppose all of the major oil corporations as well – No driving… Hmmm…

And I suppose if I did the research, most pharmaceuticals would be on this list as well, considering Bayer Corporation was imported from the Nazi conglomerate corporation I.G. Farbin – for which the Zionists handed over the Jews to its forced labor camps (not death camps). Oh, does that surprise you? Well… blaming Hitler for all of the bad things of WW2 is like blaming Bush for 9/11… it’s what you are supposed to do so that you don’t see the truth about who really did the dirty deeds. Leaders and presidents are pawns!!!

And how about anything supported by the U.S. Government, the biggest corporation in the world, which whole-heartedly supports Israel no matter what Israel does to terrorize America?

Ha! Boycotting government… Well that’s a game-changer if ever there was one!

The real question is… Are we strong enough as a people to stop participating in the corporate stranglehold that supports death and destruction around the world? Can you grow and cook your own food, drink water from the tap, dig a well, or filter it from a stream, chop down your own trees to build your own house without permits, stop paying taxes that go to support Israel and the Zionist genocide of Palestine , Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and soon to be Iran and Egypt – not to mention the Zionist owned central bank – the Federal Reserve, turn off the porn and go make love to your lover or spouse, and smash your TV and go out into this beautiful world and make your own entertainment?

Well, my best idea is just this… Let’s all boycott these damn Zionists in our government that have our country in a stranglehold. No more paying them taxes, no more citations for disobeying their petty statutes and legalities, no more fines or fees or luxury taxes, no more fraudulent voting on rigged machines, and no more loyalty to the United States Corporation, but instead to the now dead Constitution, just waiting to be reborn in modern glory. Let’s declare sovereignty from the Zionist held U.S. Incorporated. How about that for a boycott!!!

Let’s start by kicking out of the country all unelected “officials” with duel citizenship with America and Israel (but not duel loyalty to American interests). A grand Jury ought to do the trick. That’s right Mr. Raum Emanuel – son of an Israeli terrorist, Obama’s Chief of Staff, and second most powerful man in America – you are on the Zionist shit-list. And then we should review the loyalties and constitutionality of our past and present elected officials, and re-check the voting machines to ensure they got elected honestly, and then dissemble the Dibold company and others like it from the top down. And then we should destroy all voting machines in a glorious celebration of freedom from technological tyranny, making it a recurring yearly holiday, right after the Great Purging Day (the day we purged the Zionists and anyone who supports them from our government and from our land, like so many civilizations and empires before us – no, not a holocaust, just a swift kick in the ass and an advisement to not let the door hit their Zionist butts on their way back to Khazarian Israeli occupied Palestine, or wherever they claim to call home – without weapons and money from America, they’ll be homeless, like their Palestinian victims). And then let’s support Palestine in its efforts to rebuild and re-establish its homeland that we Americans have idly stood by and let our Zionist megalomaniacs in government financially support the stealing of and the genocide of its beautiful peoples, to the tune of more than $10,000 per tax-payer in America! Perhaps Israelis can live in only 9% of the Palestinian land and not travel on Palestinian roads, and see how they like it.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

So why did I write this essay?

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

A few years ago, I went to see Al Gore’s “The Inconvenient Truth” movie, and it had such an impact on my emotional character that the pure rubbish and lies it entailed were completely hidden from my usually logical reasonable disposition. Thus I had went around and recomended this propoganda movie to everyone I knew, stating in hind sight quite emberassing things like, “This is the most important movie ever made…” and “This should be required viewing for everyone, everywhere!” Needless to say, once I came down from my emotionally induced state of  “save the planet” and did a couple of weeks of real research, I kicked myself when I found out that Al Gore was in the carbon trading business as co-founder of his own carbon trading company, that the famous tear-jerking polar bear picture portraying the stranded polar bear on a lone melting little iceberg in what seemed to be the middle of the ocean was in fact a croped picture just a mile or so off shore, and that polar bears can swim over 100 miles without even breaking a sweat, and that the polar bear population had actually grown since the earlier 1900’s from endangered at about 5,000, to well over 25,000 in modern times thanks to real conservation methods over several decades.

And now, as I finish writing this, I realize that this emotionally driven roller-coaster had happened once before in my life, for another movie for which lies and falsified history were rolled up into one powerful propaganda piece that changed my whole outlook on the holocaust, and actually made me sympathetic and accepting to the concept of reparations to Israel and that all whites should be guilty for some insane reason over what the German people supposedly did to the Jews in the holocaust. That movie was the famous “Schindler’s List”.

The true story of Schindler and of his list of 1300 Jews to be “saved” came from his wife, who called Steven Spielberg an all out lair and that his film was “packed with lies.” at a presentation of her autobiographical book, and indicated that her husband Oscar was a selfish, greedy man…

“Spielberg’s film … portrays Oscar as a hero of this century. That is not true. Neither he nor I were heroes. We were just what we were able to be. In war we are all souls without a destiny,”—Emilie Schindler Memoirs

“They say in that book (Keneally’s Schindler’s List) that I gave the Jews the food in their mouths. I never had time to find out who was sick and who had to be fed (by hand). I am no good as a nurse, I tell you frankly. I have no talent for nursing . . . I bought the food for everyone.” —Emilie Schindler

“Schindler was a drunkard. Schindler was a womanizer. His relations with his wife were bad. He often had not one but several girlfriends. Everything he did put him in jeopardy. If Schindler had been a normal man, he would not have done what he did.” —Mosche Bejski, on of the Jews in Schindler’s factory, which he “saved” to be a cheap laborer, and for no other reason.

“THERE WAS NEVER A SCHINDLER’S LIST. It was drawn up by a man called Goldman. This man took money to put a name on that list – no money, no place on the list. I was told this by a Dr Schwartz, in Vienna; he had paid in diamonds to save his wife…” —Emilie Schindler

“Emily Schindler – Memoirs” portrays her husband Osker as a greedy man whose interest in saving Polish Jews from Adolph Hitler’s death camps was to have cheap labor for his factory. She also admits purports that without his factory running, Oskar Schindler would have been drafted to the SS and sent to the front lines. For remember, Schindler was a Nazi, who entertained Nazi’s on a constant basis in his wealthy home. How else do you keep a good thing going but by wining and dining your superiors?

“What matters now is being able to take our people somewhere else, so that we can continue to work,” —Emilie Schindler

Again, the point must be made that no person and no race is above corruption. Only a brave few individuals, of which the Schindler family were not.

“What does he know about my life? Absolutely nothing.” —Emilie Schindler, referring to Spielberg.

“Steven Spielberg only gave me $50,000 for making a film about the Holocaust and my husband, and he never asked me permission, he just did it.”   Emilie Schindler, Drudge, June 1, 1999.

There is so much more information that should be included within this essay, such as the Jewish Zionist President of France Nicolas Sarkozy recently preaching forced diversity, threatening French ethnically European white citizens that if they don’t begin to inter-marry with other races, harsher government action will be required to force it to happen. Nicolas Sarkozy also plans on “giving preference to minorities in job hiring and prosecuting those who do not comply“. In other words, affirmative action (which is neither civil nor equal rights) as a government policy, is being implemented with military-style enforcement from which none are exempt.

And this Zionist fervor is happening all over the world…

Screaming… …they (Jews) control America, no matter which government comes into power, whether Republican or Democratic, whether Barack Obama or George Bush…’ “Their control of America, just like the control of most Western countries, is in the hands of Jewish money and if Jewish money controls their country then you cannot expect anything else.” Fatima Hajaig, Deputy Foreign Minister of South Africa, in a speech at a Palestine solidarity rally. She later appologized, saying she “…meant to say Zionists, not Jews!”

–And now the South African Zionist Lobby and propaganda machine in response…

“There has not been any realistic alternative. Not since the era of pro-Nazi Nationalist MPs more than half a century ago had such statements been made against Jews by a senior (South African) government official.”   Zev Krengel, Jewish board of deputies, in response to the Fatima Hajaig comment. Though true, the comments are dismissed as racism once again, without saying they are untrue!

“The Jewish community is outraged by such a public display of bigotry by a senior government representative. As South African citizens, we cannot allow this kind of comment to be brought into this country.”   Wendy Kahn, Jewish board of deputies, in response to the Fatima Hajaig comment. While never denouncing the comments as untrue, she described the comments as “classic anti-Jewish stereotyping and conspiracy-theory mongering…”, and that comments like these are used by anti-Jewish hate groups to portray Jews as scheming, manipulative and disloyal to the countries in which they lived. But she ‘meant to say Zionist’s!!!


“White genocide” is a term I couldn’t even imagine a few years ago, but is in fact now close to a reality in Africa as chants and songs of killing the “Ama Bhulu” (older tribal term for white dutch settlers) are sung with passion and anger. But the unknown aspect is that the references in these songs and chants are supporting the good communist party and Jewish Zionist Joe Slovo, who posed in pictures with Nelson Mandela under the flag of communism, and who was the main Jewish Zionist anti-Christian and anti-white advocate in South Africa. Of course, most don’t know that Nelson Mandela, despite his hero status and “Peace Prize”, was an avid supporter of terrorist bombings of men, women and children. And while the black citizens in America are trained from birth through the Zionist media and movies to have the opinion that whites do not deserve civil rights, that white is not a color, that the “white devil” is the reason for the plight of American black and Mexican history, and that it is somehow us (blacks) against them (non-blacks), and even while blacks in Africa continue in a tradition of 10,000 years of keeping and selling other blacks as slaves, the American value of human rights and human life – that all men are created equal, regardless of color – seems to have been swept away with the constitution that declared it, and replaced by Zionist ideals of racial ethnic cleansing, perpetual civil war, hate, and genocide.

“South Africa – Black Rage, With Repression – A Challenge For U.S. Policy” —Time Magazine cover.

“…the murder rate of the (white) boer farmers is about 4 times as high as it is for the rest of the population… There is a motive of hatred, that these are hate crimes, that people are tortured… murdered in ways that are dehumanizing.”Dr. Gregory Stanton, President of Genocide Watch.

Over 35,000 whites, many farmers in South Africa, have been murdered in what is being eluded to by many as a “white genocide”. But these white Christians are not just being murdered, but mutilated, raped, tortured, chopped up, tied up, torn to pieces, and killed in the most horrific of ways… not coincidentally, just like in a “Jewish Torture Porn”.

“Genocide Watch does not believe that South Africa has reached the stage of actual genocide (stage 7 on our 8 stage scale.)  We believe that hate crimes against whites, particularly Boer farmers, place South Africa at Stage 5, the “Polarization” stage that precedes genocide.  Many situations of polarization do not finally result in genocide if preventive steps are taken to stop the genocidal process. However, we are concerned that if recent racist statements to “kill the Boer” by the President of the African National Congress Youth League, Julius Malema, are not repudiated by top ANC leaders, and if he is not disciplined and blocked in his intention to increase his power, the situation in South Africa will worsen, and Genocide Watch will raise the warning level to Stage 6, Preparation for genocide.” —Genocide Watch, May 2010, Dr. Gregory Stanton, President of Genocide Watch. Julius Malema was charged with hate crimes in march, 2010.

At one time in the south African cities built by the white “Boers”, millions of black African’s came for jobs, education, hospitals, and other services, with only a 5% unemployment rate for blacks, better rates than the United States. But then in 1994, the African National Congress (ANC) became South Africa’s governing left-wing, non-racial democracy party, supported by its unholy trinitiy of a Zionist alliance with the Congress of South African Trade Unions (COSATU) and the SOUTH AFRICAN COMMUNIST PARTY (SACP). The African National Congress became the ANC in 1923 and formed a military wing, the Umkhonto we Sizwe (Spear of the Nation) in 1961. The ANC is a member of Socialist International, a worldwide organization of democratic socialist, social democratic, socialist, and labour political parties (remember, all isms are communism, and democracy is part of the communist platform). It was formed in 1951, with Zionist Joe Slovo as chief of staff. Before the ANC took over in 1994, South Africa was one of the safest nations in Africa for blacks and whites. Now it is the murder and rape capital of the world, with 50% unemployment rates.

Apartheid fell in grand world celebration by people and cultures who had no idea what they were celebrating – the poisonous Zionist stake through the heart of South Africa people and leaders. But in the same year that Apartheid fell, the genocide of over 800,000 Tutsi’s in Rwanda by the Hutu’s began. Black ethnic (black on black) genocides then began all over the continent, in Ethiopia, Zimbabwe, Chad, Congo, Somalia, Angola, Liberia, Botswana, Mali, Mozambique, and many others…

Over and over, the once stable countries of the world have become subject to Zionist communist ideals, hate and subversion branded as democracy. And with the United States being used as the military arm to do the bidding of these Zionist elite, any nation is susceptible to having a new government forced down its throat, while American citizens are made to believe that this is just “democracy at work”. Terrorism works well as a tool for democracy.

One last bit of information, that I’ve always wanted for women to know…

“Common sense tells us that the only way to increase the value of diamonds is to make them scarce, that is to reduce production.” —Cecil Rhodes, founder of De Beers Mining, who received funding and for which De Beers is now owned by the founding Zionist ROTHSCHILD FAMILY.

“Our only risk is the sudden discovery of new mines, which human nature will work recklessly to the detriment of us all.” —Cecil Rhodes, founder of De Beers Mining

Now, to translate these statements for those who are blinded by the diamond’s sparkle… diamonds are in fact almost worthless as precious jewelry, and are in fact so damn prevalent in Africa as to make them all but valueless. Precious simply means the same as rare. And diamonds are about as rare as coal! The diamond business is a scam, and good ol’ Cecil Rhodes knew this all too well in his diamond monopoly, and the villainous Rothschild dynasty has kept that myth going to this day in a multi-billion dollar industry based on a big fat lie. And that diamond you may have on your finger or around your neck, or just sitting in a dark jewelry box somewhere… that literal “rock” was mined with the blood of Africans, who are exploited as extremely cheap labor by these Zionist tyrants and corporations, and you paid a mark-up price of about 60,000%.

LOL! I hope your “status in society” (jackass) was worth every greedy penny.

Imagine the amount of hungry North-Africans (and for that matter Americans!) that could have been feed with that Zionist blood money you spent on your diamonds.

Simply put, a grand awakening must happen now, or else this world will fall completely into the hands of this tiny, minuscule minority of evil, warmongering, genocidal people, who by their own writings and words – for which you’ve just read – claim to be the chosen masters of us all, and we… their cattle. This is not a racial issue, for we are not dealing with a race. We are dealing with the wealthy elite and the brainwashed fools who support and follow them.

Good and holy Jews are welcome in my home and in my heart and in my country for all eternity, with freedom of religion and in pursuit life, liberty, and happiness… however, usury does not and should not have a place anywhere.

Now, I have no doubt that I will hence forth be called by some an anti-Semite for trying to expose this information, despite the fact that the majority of these statements weren’t even my words, but were said by those who falsely claim to be “Semites”. And if you’ve gotten to this point of the story, I hope that you can now comprehend the ridiculousness of this emotionally driven, false racial anti-Semite labeling in lieu of logical discourse. But you know what? That anti-Semite label suddenly seems so much lighter to bear than letting these Zionist bankers (including the Federal Reserve) rip apart our economy and purposefully induce the greatest grand depression ever imaginable onto this country and onto the world, by continuing to steal all of our wealth and productivity, as well as our pride, our morals, and our values.

I hope that you might feel the same way… for inaction will allow this darkness to dominate any light left.

Violence is not the answer, and it never will be. Peaceful non-compliance with an unlawful American government full of citizens of Israel – and the boycott of corporate Zionist products and services is the answer. The term “buy American” must be reinvigorated, the Libertarian ideals of limited government and constitutional virtue, and civics, morals, and values must be re-introduced into an infrastructure and business structure that has been overtaken by greed and usury.

May all of humanity (the only real “race”) one day live in peace, without this supremacist Zionist foe or any other elitist or monetary enslavement as threats.

Please… play this forward…

Please see part 2 of this essay here: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2010/08/29/zionism-101-the-zionist-israeli-government-of-the-united-states-of-amerika/

.

Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)

Monday, June 7, 2010


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Bonus:

Who’s Jew in the Obama Cabinet (past and present)?

An incomplete list…

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

 

Rahm Emanuel – White House Chief of Staff; son of a Zionist terrorist; dual-citizen of Israel and America (Emanuel served in Israel’s military during the First Gulf War instead of the U.S. military)

Joe Biden – A self-proclaimed Zionist, Biden stated about Iran, “Israel can determine for itself—it’s a sovereign nation—what’s in their interest and what they decide to do relative to Iran and anyone else.”

Ron Klain – Chief of Staff to the Vice President

Mona Sutphen – Deputy White House Chief of Staff; 2nd behind Rahm Emanuel

David Axelrod – Special Adviser to the President

Tim Geithner – Treasury Secretary, former President of the New York Fed

Paul Volcker – Chair of Obama’s Economic Recovery Advisory Board (and former Chairman of the Fed)

Lawrence (Larry) Summers (Samuelson) – Director of the White House National Economic Council, Wall Street executive, and World Banker… no conflict of interest here, eh?

Jared Bernstein – Chief Economist and Economic Policy Adviser to the Vice President

Gary Gensler – Chair of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Elena Kagan – Solicitor General of the United States, Department of Justice – and Obama’s new Supreme Court Nominee

Sally Katzen – Major legal adviser to Obama-Biden

Eric Lander and Harold E. Varmus – Co-Chairs of the President’s Council of Advisers on Science/Technology

Ellen Moran – White House Director of Communications… which is why we don’t communicate!

Peter Orszag – Director of the Office of Management and Budget

Penny Pritzker – Obama’s National Finance Chair during election, billionare of the Chicago crime boss family, the Pritzkers

Robert Reich – Economic adviser to Obama-Biden

Dennis Ross – Obama’s Ambassador-At-Large in the (entire) Middle East, Obama’s “top envoy” (so a Zionist Jew is in charge of the Arab/Israeli Conflict)

Robert Rubin – Economic adviser to Obama-Biden, former Treasury Secretary, and ultra-greedy Wall Street crook.

Daniel B. Shapiro – Head of the Middle East Desk at the National Security Council (another Jew involved in foreign policy matters involving the Middle East); also a major Washington lobbyist

Mary Schapiro – Chair of the Securities and Exchange Commission, served in every Presidential administration since Reagan, also an executive for Duke Energy and Kraft Foods  meaning she regulates Wall Street as a Wall Street executive (what ever happened to conflicts of interest?)

Barney Frank – Chairman, United States House Committee on Financial Services

Phil Schiliro – Assistant to the President for Legislative Affairs, also Henry Waxman’s long-time Chief of Staff

Neal Wolin – Deputy Secretary, U.S. Treasury Department

Lael Brainard – Under Secretary, U.S. Treasury Department

Richard C. Holbrooke – Special Envoy to Pakistan/Afghanistan

Stuart Levey – Under Secretary for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence

Jason Furman – Deputy Director, Office of Management and Budget

Jeffrey Zeints – Chief Performance Officer to streamline government and cut costs as well as Deputy Director for Management at the Office of Management and Budget

Sheila Bair – Chairman, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Karen Mills – Administrator, Small Business Administration

Jon Leibowitz – Chairman, Federal Trade Commission

Douglas H. Shulman – Commissioner, Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

Neil M. Barofsky – Office of the Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program (SIGTARP)

James B. Steinberg – Deputy Secretary of State, second in rank only to Hillary Clinton in foreign policy matters

Jacob Lew – Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources, second in rank only to Hillary Clinton in foreign policy matters

Jeffrey D. – Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs (Includes Mideast)

Lee Feinstein – Foreign Policy Advisor

Eric Lynn – Middle East Policy Advisor (again, a Zionist Jew advising on Arab affairs?)

Dennis Ross – Special Advisor for the Gulf (Iran) and Southwest Asia to the Secretary of State

Steven L. Rattner – Director, Presidential Task Force on the Auto Industry

Kenneth R. Feinberg – Special Master for Compensation, U.S. Treasury Department

Mara Rudman – Foreign Policy Advisor

Julius Genachowski – Chair, Federal Communications Commission

Dr. Margaret Hamburg – Commissioner, Food and Drug Administration

Dr. Joshua Sharfstein – Deputy Commissioner, Food and Drug Administration

Susan Sher – Chief of Staff for First Lady Michelle Obama

Dr. Thomas R. Frieden – Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Neal S. Wolin Deputy Secretary of the Treasury

Michael S. Barr – Assistant Secretary for Financial Institutions

David S. Cohen – Assistant Secretary for Terrorist Financing

Christina D. Romer (white) – Married to Jewish husband David H. Romer, Chairman, Council of Economic Advisers

Budget and Financial – no wonder these are so screwed up!

Douglas W. Elmendorf – Director, Congressional Budget Office (CBO)

Jon D. Leibowitz – Chairman, Federal Trade Commission (FTC)

Sheila C. Bair – Chairman, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)

John E. Bowman – Director, Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS)

Karen G. Mills – Administrator, Small Business Administration (SBA)

Mary L. Schapiro – Chairman, Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)

Gary G. Gensler – Chairman, Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)

Daniel J. Roth – President and Chief Executive Officer, National Futures Association (NFA)

Market ManipulatorsA small list of the corporateers and regulators who don’t regulate them –

Duncan L. Niederauer – Chief Executive Officer & Director, NYSE Euronext

Robert Greifeld – Chief Executive Officer, NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc.

Lloyd C. Blankfein – Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.

Robert B. Zoellick – President, The World Bank

Stephen Roach –Manageing Director and Economist of Morgan Stanley

Martin Feldstein – Director of American International Group (AIG)

Alan Fishman – CEO of Washington Mutual

George Soros – Major player in all things, Quantum (hedge) Fund

Treasury Department – under (but who control) Secretary Timothy Geithner

Matthew Kabaker – Deputy Assistant Secretary, Counselor to the Secretary

Lewis Alexander – Counselor to the Secretary

Lee Sachs – Counselor to the Secretary

Jake Siewert – Counselor to the Secretary

Gene Sperling – Counselor to the Secretary

Federal Reserve Board of Governors

Ben Shalom Bernanke Chairman

Donald L. Kohn Vice Chairman

Kevin M. Warsh – Married to Jewish wife Jane Lauder

Jewish Federal Reserve District Bank Presidents:

Eric S. Rosengren – President, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston

Charles I. Plosser – President, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia

Jeffrey M. Lacker – President, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond

James B. Bullard – President, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Gary H. Stern – President, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis

Thomas M. Hoenig – President, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City

Richard W. Fisher – President, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas

Janet L. Yellen – President, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco

Obama Czars, illegally appointed officials with power over congress –

Economic Czar – Larry Summers

Regulatory Czar – Cass Sunstein

Pay Czar – Kenneth Feinberg

Guantanomo/Military Czar – Daniel Fried

Car Czar – Steven Rattner

Border Czar – Alan Bersin

Climate Czar – Todd Stern

Global Warming Czar – Carol Browner – Socialist International, that advocates “global governance.” Not Jewish, but very supportive of Zionist and communist/socialist ideals.

…?

And the list goes on and on and on and on…

 

Please see part 2 of this essay here: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2010/08/29/zionism-101-the-zionist-israeli-government-of-the-united-states-of-amerika/

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,862 other followers