My Concession For The Procession Of Imbeciles

That’s right, folks… I lost. I will not be president of the United States.

I will not be president for one and only one reason this term:


“The presidential candidate with the most royal genes and chromosomes has, up to now, always won the White House…”

–Burke’s Peerage researchers


“[Bush] is closely related to every European Monarch both on and off the throne… Not one member of his family was working class, middle class, or even middle, middle class…”

–Harold Brooks-Baker, Burke’s Peerage publishing director–


“Believe it or not, Mitt Romney and George W. Bush are cousins — 10th cousins, twice removed, that is.”

“Romney is actually related to six past presidents — more than any other 2012 GOP contestant. Franklin D. Roosevelt is his eighth cousin, twice removed, and both Calvin Coolidge and Herbert Hoover are his 10th cousins. Then there is his sixth cousin (four times removed) Franklin Pierce, and both 10th cousins Bush I and II. Three out of these six were even (gasp!) Democrats.”

–Time Magazine–


“Obama and Palin are 10th cousins through a common ancestor named John Smith… As for [Rush] Limbaugh, he’s also a 10th cousin of the president – one time removed…”

“President George W. Bush? He’s related to both Obama and Palin, the site found. Obama and Bush are 11th cousins through common ancestor Samuel Hinckley, and Bush and Palin are 10th cousins one time removed, also through Hinckley – who, and stay with us now, was John Smith’s father-in-law.”

“Obama is related to investor Warren Buffett and actor Brad Pitt.”

“Palin, the former Alaska governor and Republican vice presidential candidate, is a distant cousin of both Franklin D. Roosevelt and Princess Diana.”

“In 2007, Cheney’s wife, Lynne, discovered ancestral ties between former Vice President Dick Cheney and Obama while researching her book. She said the relationship was eighth cousin…”

“Palin is distant cousins with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and conservative author and pundit Ann Coulter…”

–, via Anastasia Tyler–


“[Bush’s] royal kin include Britain’s Queen Elizabeth II, the Queen Mother, Duchess Sarah “Fergy” Ferguson and even the late Princess Diana.  His most prominent ancestor may be England’s King Charles II”

“Bill Clinton and Bob Dole have more in common than wanting to be president. They are distant cousins! However, Clinton has bluer blood, giving him an election edge”

“Bill Clinton was born William Jefferson Blythe, but took his stepfather’s name as a teenager. Clinton’s ancestry can be traced back, on his mother’s side, to King Henry III who ruled England from 1227 to 1272. He is descended from King Robert I of France. Furthermore, he is related to every Scottish monarch to the current British royal family… Clinton is related to every ancient aristocratic family in Britain today.”

“As for John Kerry, “the 60-year-old can trace his roots back to the first Massachusetts governor, John Winthrop, to every great family in Boston and to a host of royals in Europe. Kerry can almost certainly be traced back to King James I and to the bloodlines straight through the Windsor and Hanover families,” Brooks-Baker said. “But both candidates have a remarkable number of royal connections
and both are related to Queen Elizabeth.”


“President George W. Bush and Sen. John Kerry are related. Well, sort of. They’re ninth cousins, twice removed. So what’s a little competition between family?”

“Playboy founder Hugh Hefner, who is the ninth cousin of both men… Twice removed from Mr. Bush, Hefner is a slightly closer relation to Kerry, only once removed.”

“Well I feel closer to Senator Kerry,” Hefner chuckled, over the phone from the Playboy Mansion in Los Angeles.”

“You know I’m an 11th generation direct descendant of William Bradford, who came over on the Mayflower, a direct descendant of a puritan,” Hefner continued proudly, finding no irony in the fact. “I suppose that it is not a big surprise but it is certainly unique to be a relation to both candidates.”


Now I could go on, and on, and on here… and I could show you that all prominent politicians and their wives, historians, queens and kings, Hollywood actors, authors, poets, and any other influential person in history and politics is always a bloodline member. I could even tell you that the truth is that George Bush is the 9th cousin of his own mother Barbara Peirce, as is common in keeping the bloodline pure.

But what’s the use?

The procession of Imbeciles continues deep into the night as Americans vote; then rushing home to turn to their favorite bloodline cousin in the news to tell them that their fake-popular vote did indeed make a difference, and that democracy works in America.

Of course, the typical American imbecile doesn’t understand how the presidential elections work through the electoral college.

The Washington Post wrote on Sunday:

“This year, once again, Americans are confronted with the distinct possibility that the winner of a tight presidential race might not be the candidate who received the most votes…

The electoral college is the system the country has – and has had for centuries – an institution that should be adjusted only with extreme care.

Meanwhile, if today’s election produces a split between the popular and the electoral votes, Americans should keep their cool.

Both candidates accepted and played by the current rules, byzantine as they are. The popular vote will be a byproduct of a contest in which both sides spent time, energy, and money to win the most electoral votes.

As in every presidential election since George Washington’s first, the candidate who achieves that constitutionally prescribed goal will be the legitimate president-elect.”

***In case you missed that, the Washington Post just told you that your vote means absolutely JACK-SHIT, and that the 538 electors (1 per congressman) will decide who your president will be.


And for those who don’t know what the government and your bloodline rulers mean when they call you an imbecile, here is the legal definition for your understanding:

IMBECILITY, med. jur. A weakness of the mind, caused by the absence or obliteration of natural or acquired ideas; or it is described to be an abnormal deficiency either in those faculties which acquaint us with the qualities and ordinary relations of things, or in those which furnish us with the moral motives that regulate our relations and conduct towards our fellow men. It is frequently attended with excessive activity. of one or more of the animal propensities.

2. Imbecility differs from idiocy in this, that the subjects of the former possess some intellectual capacity, though inferior in degree to that possessed by the great mass of mankind; while those of the latter are utterly destitute of reason. Imbecility differs also from stupidity. (q. v.) The former consists in a defect of the mind, which renders it unable to examine the data presented to it by the senses, and therefrom to deduce the correct judgment; that is, a defect of intensity, or reflective power. The latter is occasioned by a want of intensity, or perceptive power.

3. There are various degrees of this disease. It has been attempted to classify the degrees of imbecility, but the careful observer of nature will perhaps be soon satisfied that the shades of difference between one species and another, are almost imperceptible.


So good luck American imbeciles…

You did your patriotic duty and voted for what you believe is the lesser of two evils – despite the fact that the spawn of evil has been ever-present since the birth of this country (the bloodline were even the signers the constitution and Declaration of Independence – cousins of the King of England that is – placing Americans into permanent debt to the bloodline).

As for my prediction of who will be the winner in this 2012 presidential election?

Why, the bloodline, of course… no matter who wins!

But it does appear that Mitt Romney has more royal bloodline connections than Obama this year, and so my best guess would be Romney.

See the Romney pedigree here, as proudly displayed by the Mormon Church (Romney is cousins with all past Mormon Presidents, by the way, as are all United States Presidents):

And the extended Delano/Howland chart:

A list of most presidents and their genealogical relationship to each other (note that all U.S. Presidents are cousins of George Washington, cousin of the bloodline royalty of England and the world):

And finally, a list of just some of the cousins of John Kerry and George Bush:


One last thing…

Before you dismiss this as coincidence or 6 degrees of separation as the media tells you to, here is what “Jewels of the Crown” says, from “A newsletter of the Order of the Crown of Charlemagne in the United States of America”:

“Many Americans who descend from certain 17th century American colonists, known as “gateways” are able to prove descent from the royal houses of Europe…

“More than 20 American Presidents, including the current one, are believed to have royal ancestry, and thus, in all probability, also have Charlemagne ancestry. President Obama’s “gateway” ancestor, Martha Eltonhead (Mrs. Edwin Conway), is shared with President James Madison…”

“It should be noted that Americans whose ancestors came from continental Europe in the colonial period and the 19th Century are unlikely to easily delineate descent from Charlemagne in their background. There was a separation of classes in Europe and the blood of the rulers seldom flowed legitimately into the blood of the nobility and commoners…”

“The search for new gateway ancestors and new lines to validate former gateway ancestors continues on a pace. In my own case I have seen Thomas Bradbury accepted only to fall from grace more than twice. He’s back in Tracy’s book, but I don’t know for how long. So tell your Bradbury descendants to join now while the going is good.”

“Annual Meeting “Le Bal des Royals” (in Washington D.C)

The meeting was called to order by Dr. Hardwick Smith Johnson, Jr., President General of the Order of the Crown of Charlemagne in the United States of America together with Richard A. Gregory, President General of the Order of the Merovingian Dynasty at 7:30 p.m. for this combined meeting of both Orders. 160 members and guests were present for this combined meeting.

The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America was recited and the Invocation given by the Rev. Dr. Christopher Mark Agnew, Chaplain General of the OCC.

***Note that the “Flag” of the United States corporation is the same as the crown’s “East India Company” (Corporation) flag pre-United States:


America is a lie, folks!

Wake up, or stay enslaved to this international kingdom and corporation!!!


–Clint Richardson (
–Election day, Tuesday, November 6th, 2012

Who’s Responsible For Federal Crime?

As I have pointed out many times, there is only one elected official in the Executive Branch of the Federal Government. That official – the President – then appoints each cabinet member and other bureaucracies that in turn appoint (hire) a full staff for themselves. Elect one person, and you are stuck with millions of appointed people.

Does this still sound like a representative government to you?

I don’t think so either.

In fact, as I was interviewing former New Jersey Senator Dick Larossa today, we came up with a fantastic idea…

We, the people have only allowed one man through election to be the President of the United States. We have, in fact, granted him or her complete command of the military, and total autonomy over the Executive Branch of government.

And herein lies the solution.

You see, every time someone screws up or commits treason in any of the Executive Departments of the Federal Government, the responsibility for this crime rests solely on the person who appointed that office-holder. That person is the President of the United States. Not the Vice-President, for he or she is simply the appointed running-mate of the President. You don’t really vote for that office. They are just along for the ride.

Let’s put this into perspective here:

1) If my child commits a crime, as the parent I must be responsible for that crime as the parent or legal guardian of that child.

2) If I have a power of attorney over my mother or father due to their old age and incapacity to care for themselves, I am also responsible for their actions, and must pay for their antics.

3) If I am the CEO of a corporation, I am responsible for the actions of my employees. I hire them, or I hire the person who hires them.

The theory here is to place all responsibility and punishment for any actions taken in any Presidential appointed office on the President of the United States who appointed them – with the intent and full knowledge that if you run for President, you are guilty until proven innocent of any crime committed in your Departments.

The politicians and attorneys would scurry away like cockroaches, scared of the light, and actually afraid of being in power. Only an honest man would take on a public position such as this. And the opportunistic slime who currently inhabit the bureaucracy of the Federal Government would quickly crumble and fade away.

As it currently stands, the president can get away with just about anything because he can always blame one of his appointments as the patsy or guilty party. In this way, massive crime can be committed with total deny-ability.

So, from now on, I say Obama and any future elected President (including myself) is automatically responsible for his or her staff’s actions, until proven to be innocent. After all, he is the only guy we elected!

Oh, and that just happens to include EVERYTHING that happens in the:

Is this really too much to ask?


–Clint Richardson (
–Thursday, August 4th, 2011