Corporation Nation Radio, Now History (His Story)


It is with profound comfort and sadness that after more than 2 years I have decided to cease broadcasting with Republic Broadcasting Network 5 days a week. This decision reflects nothing regarding that station or its employees, and I wish to thank John Stadtmiller for trusting and allowing me such a platform in such a prime time. Republic is unfortunately a remnant of the old model of network radio being systematically abused, attacked, and made obsolete by the technology of the internet. John is fighting one hell of a battle to keep RBN breathing and even to keep the lights on. Many similar stations have fallen by the same methods, and to the fact that now anyone with a cheap consumer microphone can upload their own show into the digital ether. This ability is not, as many believe, a new kind of glorious digital liberty as much as it is a destructive anarchy of unchecked and non-vetted information.

With that said, and with the broadcast sphere of Youtube and do-it-yourself internet radio personalities all selling their own brand of perceptive virtual reality (i.e. “truth”) for monetary kickbacks, the saturation effect is in my opinion a well-played tool by those who wish to obfuscate legitimacy in alternative broadcasting.

And so I have decided to focus my time in finishing what is now destined to be a three-volume work, my book series called “Strawman: The Real Story Of Your Artificial Person,” realizing that all of these digital creations may be gone tomorrow, erased from the digital ether, and leaving nothing behind to show for it. I look forward to creating an actual work in book-form that is immune from that red button of virtual and digital destruction and censorship, and even from the false flag “EMP” that may accomplish the same trick.

The first volume of this work will be free to download at my other website soon, and I will announce its posting in (.pdf) format for free download in the next couple of months. Instructions on how to obtain a hard copy (unpublished, not public, non-commercial) will be included within. As it is a private work, it will not be available by drone from Amazon or any other retail source, and is not “commercially” available in any way. It may only be obtained from myself. You will understand why this was my choice, my election when you read it.

LINK –> StrawmanStory.info

While this privilege lasts, the internet gods are allowing my archives to be available for listening and download, again free of charge, at the external site listed below.

Special thanks to Drew Carter for not only being with me from the beginning, answering the call to archive these shows, but also for creating this searchable spreadsheet of notes and links for each show and other interviews I’ve done since on other networks. At this link and in this spreadsheet you will find links to all 487 shows plus descriptions of guests and their websites.

LINK –> https://corporationnationradioarchives.wordpress.com/2016/01/01/whew-data-entry-complete/

This spreadsheet may be updated with future shows where I am guest, and  these shows will be posted on the archive site if Drew has the time and gumption.

Of course, the original archives (with commercials not cut out) will be on the RBN website as well.

To the listener, please bear in mind that this show was a learning experience especially for myself, and so was a continuum of learning and shared knowledge as my guests and myself unraveled the not-so-hidden mysteries. And of course we will never in any of our lifetimes know it all. The point is that show #400 may include the presumption of information learned in show #300. In other words, because we have never tried to sell anything on this show, keeping its intent pure and charitable, we were actually there to learn and to teach without such low and mean distractions and monetary considerations. And so like in any school setting, missing the first half of lessons or not learning the early mathematical theories and answers may mean that later information is not able to be comprehended fully. And of course much of this journey of discovery was in correcting my own fallacious notions of history, of language, and of law, and especially of the spiritual, scriptural knowledge that cannot be discovered without learning the figurative and legal language it was written in. To read the kings law book one must learn the king’s “higher” language. This is what we have learned. We have attempted in every way to kill our superego by removing our respect of our strawman id-entity. Thus, the ego must die as well.

Thanks to all who have followed and stuck with me as we have broken down paradigms and utterly destroyed history. Thanks for your letters, your gifts of books and donations, and for your support in general. Equal thanks to the trolls who have had the opposite effect as they intended, which was to make me question everything and be extra careful to seek Reality over the perception of truth in fiction. And thanks to all my friends and family, both for their love and support (and patience) and for the abandonment and painful separation. I realized long ago that to be in search of the Reality of things is rare, and that seeking such Reality is the most self-offensive thing we can do. Nothing hurts more. Nothing is more offensive than the actual Truth of Reality. For we are all living our own lie in a very convincing fiction of law and society, and with religious and patriotic zeal we defend that lie to escape Reality, even to the death.

In the end, in my final shows, as I began to see more than I bargained for, as this debtor’s hell began to manifest before my eyes, my listening friends were not surprised to see me quit. They could hear it in my voice, a profound sobering and sadness, even a hopelessness manifesting in every new discovery. However, it is only through the act of destroying all hope and facing Reality head on without artifice that each of us may ever finally act upon our knowledge and stop ignoring the problems in the hopes of some superhero that will come and save the day. The return of the Savior. For even christ’s parabolic Word tells us that in the end we can only save ourselves.

And so I leave these words, these shows, as my gift to any who seek to learn from my own limited knowledge. I will continue to post to this blog, probably more often now without having a radio show every day, and I will continue to seek the solutions, not the remedies.

My next project, I have decided, in conjunction with my writings, is to make a research documentary about the history and possibility of establishing the modern version of a monastery. Since all of our land has been stolen (on paper) from under us, which is explained in detail in my work “Strawman,” our collective problem is that we have no where left to walk to. Our parents have nothing to leave us but defective, imperfect titles and debt paper. Our blood has been figuratively corrupted through our certified birth into the legal fiction, and we stand in public attainder through contract, without the ability to be lawful heirs. And so it is my belief, my passion, that we can make the idea of a religious society, a place of immunity and sanctuary from legal debauchery and pursuit of money in mammon cool again. We cannot be free without a place to be free. We cannot practice moral, natural law without a moral, natural place to do so without legal personification. And so I believe the monastery to be the answer, even as recognized by their law. For no law of man may stand in respect of True religious intent, and True religious intent means to never respect persons or flattering titles or the oaths they take.

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…”

–=–

The meaning of this is lost simply because we are not parties to this constitution as public persons in contract. We attend churches that are legal corporations, which means they are not only respected but restricted by the legal law of government. In other words, every corporation calling itself a “church” or organized “religion” is under the legal law, not over it, defeating the entire purpose of being a religious man. Each of us is the temple, and our temple is enslaved and destroyed by our participation in legal affairs through citizenship. And so we must strive to escape such respect of artifice, by standing unseen in a Pure and True religious being based on Charity and Love, without any need or participation in legal things. We must shed our strawman and stop respecting others.

FREEDOM OF RELIGION – Embraces the concept of freedom to believe and freedom to act, the first of which (belief) is absolute, but the second of which (action) remains subject to regulation for protection of society. (Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)

–=–

To put it simply, a public U.S. citizen-ship has no right to practice any moral or religious law. This is Caesar’s society, not our own. For U.S. citizenship is the abandonment of free religion and is an acceptance of the national flattering title of legalized “Christian,” as if one can be born as a follower of christ without first obtaining years of knowledge of the scriptures. A nation cannot be a follower of christ, because a nation is a damned fiction of law, and all who respect it are in damnation. And whatever is born of the nation, all citizenships, are thus nationally whatever their creator establishes them as, which in the case of a Romanized, Latinized, “Christian Nation,” is a false, artificial title of “Christian” under Caesar (district of New Columbia). The word district in law means seizure. And all things are seized under Caesar, under this modern contractual feud of public citizenship. Essentially, even the self-proclaimed “atheist” while acting in U.S. citizenship is a corporate “Christian,” no different than those pagans who partook in Caesar’s empire and sat in the colosseums watching the True, uncontrollable followers of christ be fed to the lions.

This is the whole point of religion. For religion is the one and only exemption to the secular, legal (anti-Nature, anti-God) law of man. The only way to abjure the realm (jurisdiction) is to be convicted of crime or to join a monastery! This is well documented, and is also the difference between a private and public man.

The religions of church and state stand purposefully opposed to this, as incorporated institutions of the state designed to take man away from his True religion and provide a false temple “built by hands.”

And this brings me to the precipice, to the beginning of a new journey. I hope that you will be a part of it. I hope that you will help to spread my free work when released soon so that others may discover their own disposition so well occulted by public-mindedness, public education, and public entertainment. The legal matrix cannot be seen, for it is only a coded language artfully made to appear as Reality. The strawman cannot be viewed in the mirror, for it is only a false man built of paper, of contracts and mortgages (dead pledges) in mortmain (dead hands), of credits and debits, and of legal words and flattering titles that do not exist in Nature.

—=—

“Receive my instruction, and not silver;
and knowledge rather than choice gold.

For wisdom is better than rubies;
and all the things that may be desired
are not to be compared to it.”

—Proverbs 8: 10-11, KJB

—=—

All that I have gained I am now ready to render back to Caesar, for all I have acquired has always been the property of Caesar’s public persona, the strawman I have possessed like a demon since its birth, the puppet I breathe life into, the ship I sail on the sea of commerce. No possession, no trinket, no dwelling place, and no paper title is worth debt slavery in seizure (Caesar). I am ready to give up everything in fiction so as to embrace the Reality of Nature and Its Highest, self-evident Law. And so after years of debilitating hope and much talk I am ready to act, to find my way and to walk the spiritual path.

Perhaps we shall meet along the way.

Or perhaps we may build our dreams and find Reality again together.

Till then, there is an unlimited wealth of knowledge in this internet, even as traditional books and libraries are being figuratively burned and ignored. Deciphering that knowledge between so much bullshit is the ultimate challenge. And learning the language that enslaves us is the greatest task of all, which is the purpose of my upcoming works. When every word we speak has an opposing (legal) meaning in the jurisdiction (fictional realm) of  the church and state, we can attain only false enlightenment. We cannot read the scriptures in common English, for it is purposefully designed to be the language of illiteracy, the public language of the multitude of goyim. The priest-class never gave us the tool to decipher the Bible because they reserved the Latin meanings of their words for themselves. And our laws are written in the same, “higher” language of that spell-craft. And so a master and professor of the English language is at best a complete idiot, so in love with the meanings of the lowest, vulgar form of words that all sense of Reality is gone, as the word becomes more important than the Nature of Reality so named. And we teach each new generation in the same vulgarity, keeping the human capital management system intact through sheer nightmarish ignorance of language.

My work is designed to teach that “higher” language as they who created it have labeled it, not to use it as they do to induce harm but to defeat it utterly by recognizing its purpose. For it can only be used as a lie, as all things legal or “higher” are a lie.

But I digress…

I cannot place thousands of pages and definitions into one simple blog post. I hope that you will find enlightenment in my upcoming works.

Thank you again to all who have joined me on this journey.

And remember that everything in the legal realm is artificial, including your self. This is the key to knowledge.

–=–

“For all the gods of the nations are idols…”

—Psalms 96:5, KJB

–=–

.

–Clint Richardson (Realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Friday, January 8th, 2016

Crash: Why America Will Fall Under Its Own Shadow


As a deep researcher into what is jokingly called the economy, I am getting real tired of “economists” and their dyer warnings of eminent monetary failure and thus the collapse of the so-called U.S. “economy.” I am not an economist. In truth, anyone who claims to be one is quite frankly full of shit.

So why did I title this rant as such?

First of all, let’s dispel the fallacy that the United States needs currency to rule. The United States is a military dictatorship, a fact that I will be proving beyond any doubt in my upcoming documentary film in 2015, God willing. It is ridiculous to then consider that the United States is propped up merely by money, especially when it creates that money magically through appropriation without providing new collateral. In reality, the fiat currency is nothing more or less than debt. It is promises to pay that will never be paid, for no debt can ever be paid with debt. The United States is a bankrupt corporation, as James Trafficant stated in congressional record, and a bankrupt cannot create anything but more debt.

As stupid humans, we are trained and conditioned to believe that the dollar represents something tangible with a somehow intrinsic value. I assure you it does not. But if my word isn’t good enough for you in all of your religious fervent belief and faith for said notes of mammon, let’s hear straight from the horses mouth.

The Federal Reserve, in its publication Modern Money Mechanics, states the following:

While currency is used for a great variety of small transactions, most of the dollar amount of money payments in our economy are made by check or by electronic transfer between deposit accounts. Moreover, currency is a relatively small part of the money stock.

In the United States neither paper currency nor deposits have value as commodities. Intrinsically, a dollar bill is just a piece of paper, deposits merely book entries. Coins do have some intrinsic value as metal, but generally far less than their face value.

What, then, makes these instruments – checks, paper money, and coins – acceptable at face value in payment of all debts and for other monetary uses? Mainly, it is the confidence people have that they will be able to exchange such money for other financial assets and for real goods and services whenever they choose to do so.

Who Creates Money?

Changes in the quantity of money may originate with actions of the Federal Reserve System (the central bank), depository institutions (principally commercial banks), or the public. The major control, however, rests with the central bank.

The actual process of money creation takes place primarily in banks.’ As noted earlier, checkable liabilities of banks are money. These liabilities are customers’ accounts. They increase when customers deposit currency and checks and when the proceeds of loans made by the banks are credited to borrowers’ accounts.

In the absence of legal reserve requirements, banks can build up deposits by increasing loans and investments so long as they keep enough currency on hand to redeem whatever amounts the holders of deposits want to convert into currency. This unique attribute of the banking business was discovered many centuries ago.

It started with goldsmiths. As early bankers, they initially provided safekeeping services, making a profit from vault storage fees for gold and coins deposited with them. People would redeem their “deposit receipts” whenever they needed gold or coins to purchase something, and physically take the gold or coins to the seller who, in turn, would deposit them for safekeeping, often with the same banker. Everyone soon found that it was a lot easier simply to use the deposit receipts directly as a means of payment. These receipts, which became known as notes, were acceptable as money since whoever held them could go to the banker and exchange them for metallic money.

Then, bankers discovered that they could make loans merely by giving their promises to pay, or bank notes, to borrowers. In this way, banks began to create money. More notes could be issued than the gold and coin on hand because only a portion of the notes outstanding would be presented for payment at any one time. Enough metallic money had to be kept on hand, of course, to redeem whatever volume of notes was presented for payment.

Transaction deposits are the modem counterpart of bank notes. It was a small step from printing notes to making book entries crediting deposits of borrowers, which the borrowers in turn could “spend” by writing checks, thereby “printing” their own money.”

–=–

Can you see past the illusion?

Do you see that the so-called debt doesn’t actually represent anything at all in reality?

Do you understand that debt is the basis of all religion, and that your belief and fear in it is all that substantiates it?

When this system of monetized fakery was created, its goal was not to create wealth. For money is not wealth, it is the opposite of wealth. It is debt. It must be traded in exchange for wealth to fools. If an entire nation and planet of people can be made to believe that this debt is actually a credit, then the debt can be traded for actual wealth. In other words, an entire people can somehow be made to believe that everything in reality can be traded for merely a promise to pay, and that this promise to pay is the same as the payment itself.

As Whimpy perpetually says, we will be paid Tuesday for a hamburger today… but Tuesday never comes.

As I have shown in triplicate, government has done just that. It has created the currency, traded it for corporate stocks, foreign currencies, real estate, precious metals, and anything else representative of real wealth to the point that, as Walter Burien claims via the Comprehensive Annual Financial Reporting (CAFR) system of government accounting: “Government owns it all through investment.”

–=–
Why America Is No Longer Needed
–=–

Rome is not stationary. It’s empire extends to every corner of the globe, and its center continuously relocates itself. Its name changes as its fraud is re-discovered, re-establishing itself as the need arises. And this is when the crash comes – the revolutions of past empires.

But revolution means to revolve back to the beginning; to start over again. Same empire, different name. This is why so many movies and other media is predictively programming us to support such revolutionary dissonance. Our ideas are very seldom our own, and obviously neither are our ideals of morals and values. Entertainment enters and holds our minds in whatever political thought processes the military ruler wishes to bore into its subjects. As a former Hollywood sound guy, I have seen the script-changes ensuring favorable praise and pro-government propaganda first hand, to the chagrin of writers that are paid more “money” to cooperate or else get their projects shelved.

In other words, we literally sell our souls for debt. We worship it. We trade assets for promises to pay. And we even hoard the debt notes in the illusion of security, as if debt equals safety. Unfortunately, our unreasonable belief and faith in this debt money (the devil’s currency) has lead us to covet the very thing that is killing us slowly. We therefore defend these promises to pay even to the point of war and violent oppression of the entire planet, giving blind and unwavering support to our dictators in congress and in the militarized Executive branch to kill in our (the people’s) name for the protection of our own disease of debt in its world domination.

But things are about to change…

The world is completely taken over. Almost every sense of resistance to the United Nations and what is deemed the “New World Order” by every president in recent memory has been squelched and replaced with “friendly” regimes. It is now common practice for the United States to arm both sides of every conflict while training “peace-keepers” to take over when the U.S. military withdraws from its illegal occupation in undeclared war, usually via Executive Order or other Executive (forceful) violence.

The fall of Iran seems to be the last great international challenge. Iran stands as the last hold out. And it is more demonized with every passing day.

Russia, China, and other imaginary enemies fill up the interim, but don’t be fooled. Government investments in China are why China is any power at all. And Russia wasn’t just allowed to build up its infrastructure because the United States was asleep. U.S. bases are in every state and in every nation around the world. These are not peaceful settlements, they are military occupations. No money is needed. It is rule by force, not by economics!

But with all of this military might, how is it that the U.S. will “crash?”

In the art of war, the assassin must be killed once its job is done. The United States has all but served its purpose. It has assassinated all resistance. It’s culture (which is a lack of established culture and moral law) has been infused with most other nations. Its fake currency has bought up the world “economy,” and that wealth can easily be transferred out to the world bank, leaving the people of America hopelessly destitute. With trained peace-keepers keeping the violent peace under United Nations’ purview, the centralization of military power can now be unilaterally acquired by the U.N. The United States as a mere member state of the United Nations can and is being equalized with all others.

The necessary symbolic crash of the United States central bank and currency is absolutely a requirement for global governance, where all nations are equal as the states of this United States are pretended to be. The centralized power as military force of the United States must be dismantled for the Roman phoenix to rise in its new form of global governance. And the only way to accomplish such a seemingly impossible feat is to play the only card left in the deck – the illusion of economic collapse through the “crash” of the fake currency.

Only if the people believe in that currency as real and intrinsic can this be accomplished, just as the Federal Reserve reports above.

Why is the mainstream news now sound-biting the horrors of the Fed and propagandizing the notion of “End The Fed” as a rallying cry? Does that really make sense considering that government is the majority stock-holder of all media agencies and stocks them with Operation Mockingbird parrots of the CIA, even while it saber-raddles for the destruction of Iran? Why is the totally controlled news constantly injecting fear-porn into the general public about the eminent financial crash of America? Why is it selling gold and storable food while continuously warning about earthquakes, economic upheaval, world war, and emergency preparedness?

The answers should be obvious.

The United States has done its job; its drugged, dumbed-down population used as cannon fodder as paid mercenaries for the military corporation. The borders are open. It’s business globalized. It’s independence subverted.

The shadow of America is the corporation 10 miles square called the United States corporation. And the 50 individual states that we romantically call “America” have fallen prey to their own so-called central government, where the ten planks of the Communist Manifesto are indeed the verifiable written law. The shadow of forced unionization has destroyed an unwitting people that have no idea they are proclaimed as enemies of their own central foreign state, that their shadow military occupies each of the 50 states under Leiber Code statutes, and most importantly that their currency is and always has been nothing but debt obligation and enslavement – the land of the free subjects; a cruel joke played out through an un-winnable game of monopoly at gunpoint.

The reality is that the national debt (a negative) can be abolished and jubilee’d tomorrow with the swipe of a presidential or congressional pen. It doesn’t exist in nature. It is born and will die on legal paper. But its power of illusion is so strong that the fiction of government and its fake money will cause reality to crumble right along with it. The gambling house called the stock market may crash into obscurity, but the ownership in international corporations will remain as the real wealth is transferred away. For a stock’s value is meaningless because what it is valued in is worthless debt in the form of promises to pay. It is the ownership that is important, representing controlling stake in all corporations despite what debt currency it is monetized and valued in. For all currencies are merely debt.

There are no banks left, for there is no lawful (real) money left to be banked. Deposit institutions are not banks, they are debt brokers. If you don’t understand this, then go try and deposit a gold bar or coin into “Wells Fargo Bank” or “Bank of America” – banks in name only. You cannot. No reality allowed. You can only rent a box to safely deposit your tangible property and hope it isn’t confiscated like in the last so-called “banking emergency.” Checking accounts only house promises to pay and nothing else.

The shadow government is killing its creator.

And belief in its own declared, de facto, prima facie evidence of legitimacy is all it will take to deliver the final blow.

It will be our own sons and daughters as career mercenaries that will be our own peace-keepers at home. Their uni-forms already bear the United Nations regalia and patch-mark.

.

–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Sunday, December 21th, 2014

Debunking Education: Exposing The Syndicate


Author’s note: The following presentation is designed to give a general overview of how organized crime has replaced not only government, but the cherished institutions we’re trained like animals to participate in and respect the opinions of. The “syndicate” as is uncovered here is the foundation of all legitimacy and right granted to the worst of criminal enterprise. While the focus here is foundational, the reader may apply their knowledge of such subjects as Common Core, the Delphi Technique, Lobbying, special interests, consensus building, monopolies and trusts, grants, uniform codes and regulations, and all other psychological tools and conditioning that allow the unthinkable to permeate as normality within our government and its institutions. In order to comprehend just how vaccination, Geo-engineering, cloning, psychiatry, unnecessary live animal research, and so many otherwise immoral and unethical practices that would otherwise be shunned in society are instead accepted as normal and as “best practices” within the various institutions regulated by government,  we must expose the centralized criminal organization that represents the authority behind those acceptations. And so here I present to you the underbelly of the beast – organized crime that I call the syndicate.

–=–
Debunking Education:
Exposing The Syndicate.
–=–

.

–=–

“The most successful tyranny is not the one that uses force to assure uniformity
but the one that removes the awareness of other possibilities,
that makes it seem inconceivable that other ways are viable,
that removes the sense that there is an outside.”

–Allan Bloom, “The Closing of the American Mind”

–=–

“Generally, more highly educated people, who have higher incomes,
consume more resources than poorly educated people,
who tend to have lower incomes. In this case,
more education increases the threat to sustainability.”

–Education for Sustainable Development Toolkit Vol.2 2002

–=–

Have you ever seriously considered that education is the best and truest form of mass programming, or as Charlotte Iserbyt calls it in her now infamous book of primary research horror, The Deliberate Dumbing Down Of America? Is there more to it than just tainted textbooks and the drive to make kids less intelligent? Is there a criminal element organized at the very top that can only maintain its control and authoritarian grip on industry through this institutionalized education process, never allowing deviation from the prescribed curriculum of professors (those who profess) in a closed loop university system?

Many have considered the fleeting fancy that this is so… but establishing without doubt this notion as the foundational and obvious disposition regarding the institution of education is another matter. Mrs. Iserbyt certainly does a good job of creating the case through documentation and historical perspective, but is there some deeper aspect to this that we can delve into to prove the fraud of education as a cover for the continued inducement of organized crime?

It is my intention here to do just that.

We generally bow down to popular opinion as the majority of “normal” and “educated” people use fallacious defenses against reasonable criticism towards the education system, like titling those who question the institution of university and education as “conspiracy freaks”, even when those tomes of research comes from a former presidential appointed politician to the Federal Department of Education like Mrs. Iserbyt, who has nothing to share but first hand knowledge.

In topics of such depth and misunderstanding, sometimes the proof is in the very foundation of the object to be proved.

Not only does the central education curriculum promote a fallacious normalcy bias to protect itself and its vested interest in most walks of corporate society (education as a perfectly normal requirement for “success” in industry), it re-presents to students and teachers false history to build that bias within its own learning tools, professing the most convenient of historical biases to promote the need of its own continuity – as the preserver and teacher of history. It categorizes everything into “subjects”, as if one part of life were totally separate from the other and therefore must be taught and learned as such, thus creating “experts” with no expertise in anything but a tunnel-visioned set of false-dialectics on their particular subject of expertise. In reality, the education system has an audacious underbelly that needs to be comprehended in today’s institutional and political forum, as new standards such as “Common Core” are being implemented for ever more global centralization of what is deemed as well-adjusted “normalcy”.

To understand just what this education system is designed to do to our young and mature minds alike, we must be able to examine without bias its true structure, intent, and authority; dating back many centuries and subsisting through many empires. You see, the institution of education is what is called a syndicate.

The syndicate has always been there. It involves the most important of industries: from education, medication, legalization, appropriation, codification, and regulation. In other words, for the syndicate to maintain control over society in both profit and in the perception of its falsely projected final authority, it must be in control of government (public) opinion, medical opinion, legal opinion, access to financial grants (free taxpayer money), and most importantly the group-think opinion of the university system from whence all credentialed minds flow.

This is accomplished in modern times through the creation and use of private, non-governmental organizations and associations (NGO’s), from the American Medical Association (AMA) to the American and International Bar Associations (ABA/IBA), the National Teachers Association (NTA) and Parent Teachers Association (PTA), to the National Governors Association (NGA), which by the way holds the copyright to Common Core Standards. These completely private associations work together to impose an organized syndicate that controls the flow and false-legitimacy (stamp of approval) of information while guaranteeing profit-friendly regulation of industry. The money is of course syndicated through the Federal Reserve System, another politically “independent” association, representing the control of funding via congressional committees – the literal creator of money. This process of money creation is called “appropriation”, and it makes new taxpayer money instantly available today by creating new national debt due tomorrow. In other words, all taxpayer money collected today by the central government syndicate was already spent yesterday, the main reason it can’t be paid down. For government is ultimately the head banker; the creator, appropriator, and regulator of currency; another very important cog in the organized criminal monopoly via its publicly perceived and accepted simulacrum of legitimacy, despite its known and admitted de facto (illegitimate) nature.

The syndicate ensures and insures trust monopolies and legal standards that promote those monopolies, even as it wages war on any information or other competition that may contradict it. The syndicate is not only the seller of lies it is the promoter and insurer of them, literally syndicating its lies through mass media. Through education, the general population never comprehends the true nature of the syndicate, for its ties are not readily comprehensible and it is certainly not taught in school! Each organized institution within the syndicate is presented as a separate self-governing entity, which appears to be individually scrutinized and regulated by the other institutions that lie within the same syndicate. And yet they are all working together in syndication to promote and keep their monopoly of fraud going, each promoting the legitimacy of the other.

This is the normalization of fraud. The syndicate even teaches the proper management of fraud in schools, while producing a stage-show for the benefit of the educated people, utilizing the predictive programming taught in schools and universities to enhance the ego and appeal of the masses to their own unreasonable but authorized (syndicated) authority. As long as the money and retirement benefits flow, the syndicate remains a legitimized criminal authority in all things.

It is not that the government is the syndicate, it is that the syndicate slowly infiltrated and took over the running of the government from its inception. And from the centralized criminal government were spawned these several institutions to control each facet of industry. Thus we have the Department of Education, the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Justice,  the Department of Treasury, the Department of Labor, and the individual agencies of the FDA, EPA, the Fed, and so many others. Today, private associations make the rules for government and industry, and include members that are the law makers themselves, the attorneys, the doctors, the pharmacists, the teachers… even the students have their own student “association”. Each of these seemingly separate groups are the created and promoted non-governmental associations of the syndicate, and these member-groups ensure the future normalcy bias and inducement process of men and women into the work environment within the syndicate. And for those that are not members, we seemingly have no choice but to study from the textbooks that are created by the corporations and funded by the syndicate itself, for the syndicate also holds the exclusive power to bestow title, to give credentials, to grant degrees, and to graduate men and women with false honors and flattering titles. The syndicate makes the rules and requirements for graduation, which of course always include only syndicated (approved) texts and learning materials. And no other school or university may be established without the syndicate’s approval and adherence to its required standards and practices.

–=–
Killing Us Softly:
The Etymology Of Education
–=–

So how do you define the word education?

To tame the wild beast…

Before we can fully recognize the roots and true intent of the mandatory education system implemented by the central syndicate, we must comprehend just who is behind that system, and just what its true intent is and always has been. The university education system, its foundation and a true description of its profess-ors, and all of the preparatory “grades” necessary to reach that university “degree” of education – to finally be granted permission to work within these syndicated corporate industries –  is defined by Black’s Law Dictionary, 1st Edition quite plainly:

SYNDIC. In the civil law. An advocate or patron; a burgess or recorder; an agent or attorney who acts for a corporation or university; an actor or procurator; an assignee. In French law. The person who is commissioned by the courts to administer a bankruptcy. He fulfills the same functions as the trustee in English law, or assignee in America. The term is also applied to the person appointed to manage the affairs of a corporation.

SYNDICOS. One chosen by a college, municipality, etc., to defend its cause.

SYNDICATE. A university committee. A combination of persons or firms united for the purpose of enterprises too large for individuals to undertake; or a group of financiers who buy up the shares of a company in order to sell them at a profit by creating a scarcity.

SYNDACALISM (n.) – In 1907, from French syndicalismemovement to transfer ownership of means of production and distribution to industrial workers,” from syndicalof a labor union,” from syndicchief representative” (see syndic). “Syndicalism” is in France the new, all-absorbing form of Labor’s conflict with Capital. Its growth has been so rapid that its gravity is not appreciated abroad. This year, even more than last, the strikes and other “direct action,” which it has combined, have upset the industrial life of the country, and forced the attention of Parliament and Government. [“The Nation,” June 20, 1907]

COMBINATION. A conspiracy, or confederation of men for unlawful or violent deeds. A union of different elements. A patent may be taken out for a new combination of existing machines.

CONFEDERATIONA league or compact for mutual support, particularly of princes, nations, or states. Such was the colonial government during the Revolution.

CONFEDERACY – In criminal law. The association or banding together of two or more persons for the purpose of committing an act or furthering an enterprise which is forbidden by law, or which, though lawful in itself, becomes unlawful when made the object of the confederacy. Conspiracy is a more technical term for this offense. The act of two or more who combine together to do any damage or injury to another, or to do any unlawful act. In equity pleading. An improper combination alleged to have been entered into between the defendants to a bill in equity. In international law. A league or agreement between two or more independent states whereby they unite for their mutual welfare and the furtherance of their common aims. The term may apply to a union so formed for a temporary or limited purpose, as in the case of an offensive and defensive alliance; but it is more commonly used to denote that species of political connection between two or more independent states by which a central government is created, invested with certain powers of sovereignty, (mostly external,) and acting upon the several component states as its units, which, however, retain their sovereign powers for domestic purposes and some others. See FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.

–=–

Of course, you are not supposed to know that the federal government is actually built with intent as a simple and explicit “conspiracy” to commit unlawful acts; defined as “a combination of persons or firms united for enterprises too large for individuals to undertake“. But you need to know that this nation was created by the Articles of Confederation, which may as well be called the Articles of Conspiracy. For these words mean exactly the same thing! Just why do you think the word conspiracy is so demonized in meaning and application within the media portion of the syndicate, while the founding word “confederation” is worshiped and made to appear as if it was historically God-given?

A conspiracy and a confederation are simply defined as two or more persons organizing to defraud others. Nothing more, nothing less. And that is exactly what the Articles of Confederation achieved, leading to the constitution; a compact of debt, obligation, and enfranchisement of all men into corporate persons and debtors in an open-air prison called the United States.

The idea of syndicalism was quite successful, luring men from their families, their self-sufficient lifestyle, and their inherited land and communities into the rent and mortgage schemes within the megalopolises and manufacturing bases, inducting us into the various industries of the syndicate with the advertising and promotion of products and services. Labor unions, a communist ideal, had the very real goal of combinations of common men for the purpose of a private protected confederacy within the corporate structure. Monopolies and trusts were built, and the syndicate’s so-called industrial revolution successfully altered America into a syndicalist nation.

Labeled as “equal rights”, labor unions pitted brother against brother using the legal law to protect favoritism of member workers despite the unheard cry of equality for all men. The family farm and self-sufficiency was replaced by syndicated reality of production in factory assembly lines, where men owned and kept nothing of their own labor. And the means of production was violently switched from the individual and local people into the corporate and industrial syndicate. Homemade became industry made.  “Made in America” became “made in China”. The promise of more money and fatter pensions (the Biblical worship of mammon) secured the subversion of dignity, pride, and honor. The importance of the family unit became secondary to the importance of employment.

Once the means of production was centralized it could be exported, leaving a once independent people dependent on the retail imports and monopolized sweatshop industries of the syndicate and its foreign trade. Of course it was American syndicalist investments that built those foreign factories. Most importantly, through the education system (animal work training), men were learned with extremely limiting skills that could only be utilized in the syndicalist  industries and machine shops, creating a new form of ultimately skill-less laborer highly trained in a single employable (usable) function that was worthless outside of the syndicate (in nature) and its machinery. And those singly educated men were rewarded for this institutionalized ignorance by union membership and the detrimental benefits therein bestowed.

This incentive-based culling instilled the evolution of free men into employed men; and the words free and self-sufficient became known as “unemployment”. Of course unemployment simply means non-taxed and not syndicated – a description of both the poor and the entrepreneur. Even the savvy man was convinced to become “self-employed”, so that he could be taxed and managed in his or her capacity to produce and compete with the syndicate. Of course, most small businesses fold under such pressure and rigged competition.

Today, with the syndicate strong and men weak in their knowledge and life experience away from nature and its laws, the slow dismantling of labor unions represents the syndication of them into the legal codes of the syndicate. With all men dependent upon it, the syndicate can now pay less and charge more, for the new generations haven’t a clue that it was ever any other way. Equal pay for equal labor – the pathetic cry of the oppressed.

EMPLOY‘ – verb transitive [Latin plico.] 1. To occupy the time, attention and labor of; to keep busy, or at work; to use. We employ our hands in labor; we employ our heads or faculties in study or thought; the attention is employed, when the mind is fixed or occupied upon an object; we employ time, when we devote it to an object. A portion of time should be daily employed in reading the scriptures, meditation and prayer; a great portion of life is employed to little profit or to very bad purposes. 2. To use as an instrument or means. We employ pens in writing, and arithmetic in keeping accounts. We employ medicines in curing diseases. 3. To use as materials in forming any thing. We employ timber, stones or bricks, in building; we employ wool, linen and cotton, in making cloth. 4. To engage in one’s service; to use as an agent or substitute in transacting business; to commission and entrust with the management of one’s affairs. The president employed an envoy to negotiate a treaty. Kings and States employ embassadors at foreign courts. 5. To occupy; to use; to apply or devote to an object; to pass in business; as, to employ time; to employ an hour, a day or a week; to employ one’s life. To employ one’s self, is to apply or devote one’s time and attention; to busy one’s self.

EMPLOY’noun That which engages the mind, or occupies the time and labor of a person; business; object of study or industry; employment. Present to grasp, and future still to find, The whole employ of body and of mind. 1. Occupation, as art, mystery, trade, profession. 2. Public office; agency; service for another.

SERV’ICEnoun  [From Latin servitium.] 1. In a general sense, labor of body or of body and mind, performed at the command of a superior, or the pursuance of duty, or for the benefit of another. service is voluntary or involuntary. Voluntary service is that of hired servants, or of contract, or of persons who spontaneously perform something for another’s benefit. Involuntary service is that of slaves, who work by compulsion. 2. The business of a servant; menial office. 3. Attendance of a servant. 4. Place of a servant; actual employment of a servant; as, to be out of service. 5. Any thing done by way of duty to a superior6. Attendance on a superior.

–=–

Voluntary servitude… now where have I heard that before? No one may wish to ponder the role of money and monopolized industry as the instigators of voluntary slavery, but the shoe certainly fits. This brave new institutionalized world was created to replace the old forms of master and slave relationship, evolving the slave mentality into one of common patriotic service to industry and state (which are the same thing) – the basis of functionality of the syndicate. The words voluntary and involuntary are now so intertwined that most people have no idea what the word slave really means, simply because they can choose which form of labor they are employed (used) in as service to the syndicate.

Of course, modern ideas of slavery involve Hollywood’s version of the black man with chains around his neck.

But let’s go back to a time when Webster still roamed the land, speaking truth in his defining of terms.

SLAVE, noun 1. A person who is wholly subject to the will of another; one who has no will of his own, but whose person and services are wholly under the control of another. In the early state of the world, and to this day among some barbarous nations, prisoners of war are considered and treated as slaves. The slaves of modern times are more generally purchased, like horses and oxen. 2. One who has lost the power of resistance; or one who surrenders himself to any power whatever; as a slave to passion, to lust, to ambition. 3. A mean person; one in the lowest state of life. 4. A drudge; one who labors like a slave(–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary)

SLA’VERY, noun [See Slave.] 1. Bondage; the state of entire subjection of one person to the will of another. slavery is the obligation to labor for the benefit of the master, without the contract of consent of the servant. slavery may proceed from crimes, from captivity or from debt. slavery is also voluntary or involuntary; voluntary, when a person sells or yields his own person to the absolute command of another; involuntary, when he is placed under the absolute power of another without his own consent. slavery no longer exists in Great Britain, not in the northern states of America. 2. The offices of a slave; drudgery. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary)

–=–

And so you see, a slave by any other employable name, is still merely a slave.

Now, one might fallaciously argue (advocate) the fact that because they are paid equally as others in their employ (use) or because they are part of a labor union (a syndicalist) making them house slaves who receive a bit more pay than those other supposedly equal slaves, that employment is not actual slavery. Read again! The use of a currency which represents nothing but debt is not designed as a payment tool, but as a limiting object for voluntary slaves so they never get ahead. The wealthy elite of the syndicate aren’t as much interested in obtaining wealth as they are in having enough wealth so as to have no objects in front of them limiting their own freedom within their own syndicate. The only way this can happen is if they employ the rest of the population with limited circulation of money, obstructing their ability at self-sufficiency through currency exchange. And through the system of education this false sense of freedom is instilled upon the common class so that they volunteer against their best interests to be employed within the syndicate, never self-actualizing their own disposition. Our freedom is only what the state allows it to be, for the word freedom is yet another misunderstood word, and its true definition is not taught in public school (training of animals for future employment).

Employment is like addiction. Sure, you can claim that you can quit your job at any time, but then how will you quench your addiction to buying stuff, and for that matter your addiction to food and shelter? After all, it’s all but illegal to obtain food without money or permission from government to hunt and fish! Raw dairy is outlawed and highly regulated. Live animal restrictions abound. And small backyard gardens are next on the regulation chopping block.

But it’s a free country…

All slaves and livestock are of course free within their master’s borders and fences.

Bouvier’s 1856 Dictionary of Law, which was commissioned to be “ADAPTED TO THE CONSTITUTION AND LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND OF THE SEVERAL STATES OF THE AMERICAN UNION”, explains what freedom really is…

FREEDOM – Liberty; the right to do what is not forbidden by law. Freedom does not preclude the idea of subjection to law; indeed, it presupposes the existence of some legislative provision, the observance of which insures freedom to us, by securing the like observance from others.

–=–

And so a whole population is employed (in usury) by the slave-masters of the syndicate, who train the population in school to believe in a false notion of what freedom actually is. And the population then runs around claiming (professing) to be a free people while never knowing that freedom means forced servitude to the laws created by the syndicate and legislated though the state… or else a boot to the face. And many are employed (used) to be the boot against their own fellow slaves, forcefully ensuring a perpetually indentured society; paid mercenaries called police and military whose authority doesn’t actually exist but for the belief by the overpowering 100’s of millions that it does. A uniform and badge goes a long way in instilling faith in what does not exist but in name and credential only.

–=–
The Dictator:
Institutionalization Of God’s Legal Laws
–=–

Like every religion-based government institution of the past, the United States claims God as its foundation, somehow making right and equitable the economic enslavement of all people within its borders through its own legally bound doctrine of law. This will be clarified as we proceed…

Perhaps we should call this syndicate what it really is… a confederation theory.

The word syndicate is broken down as such:

SYN – “together with, jointly; alike; at the same time,” from Greek synwith, together with, along with, in the company of.”

DICTION – “expression of ideas in words,” from Late Latin dictionem, a noun of action from dic, past participle stem of Latin dicere speak, tell, say“, related to dicare proclaim, dedicate,” and from Old English teon to accuse,” tæcan to teach“).

–=–

This combination creates the foundation of an unseen dictatorship. It is after all foolish to believe that the word dictator refers to just one individual as dictator. Congress is certainly a dictator via its E Pluribus Unum, (out of many, one) enfranchisement. Congress is simply a confederation; a combination of men who syndicate.

DICTATOR – late 14c., from Latin dictator, agent noun from dictare (see dictate (v.)). Transferred sense of “one who has absolute power or authority” in any sphere is from c.1600. In Latin use, a dictator was a judge in the Roman republic temporarily invested with absolute power.

SHIP – word-forming element meaning “quality, condition; act, power, skill; office, position; relation between,” Middle English -schipe, from Old English -sciepe, Anglian -scipstate, condition of being,” from Proto-Germanic *-skapaz (cognates: Old Norse -skapr, Danish -skab, Old Frisian -skip, Dutch -schap, German -schaft), from *skap-to create, ordain, appoint,” from PIE root *(s)kep- (see shape (v.)).

E Pluribus Unum

Emblem on Continental Currency $40 note (1778)

–=–

To put it simply, a dictatorship is what one calls the state of being governed by those who dictate the law as “one” body politic (one corporate body). In this way, any form of government is thus a dictatorship, no matter how large a “combination” and “confederation” those lawmakers account for, and no matter how many constituents they claim to re-present. Even a so-called “democracy” is simply a dictatorship of the foolish majority over the foolish minority, neither group ever comprehending what a simple dictatorship is – a non-stop cruise-line; destination: subjection and extortion. And the majority and the minority never comprehend their equally important parts played in the legitimization of the syndicated congressional dictatorship simply through the act of voting – unwittingly confirming through voting cycle after cycle the dictatorial combination you now know as “the syndicate.”

To vote is to legitimize the syndicate.

How many times have we heard that this candidate is bought and paid for by “Big Pharma”, that this party has sold out to “Big Oil”, and that those party affiliated senators support banks over people? Well of course they do. They are all part of the same monopolized syndicate. And just so you understand, political parties are also non-governmental, private associations, which have infiltrated and now control the actions and reputations of politicians.

It would be immature to simply believe and dismiss this association (combination/confederation) of regulators, lawmakers, and corporations as simple greed. For the syndicate thrives on power and authority as any dictatorship has and will. Its purpose is not payoffs behind the scenes, but perpetual control over the entire population by its combined brotherhood and its spawn. Greed is too simplistic. The syndicate wishes to play god.

So that we fully understand, a syndicate is defined above as a university committee. In case you haven’t noticed, most of the research grants and studies that are created, that directly correlate to the medical and pharmaceutical industries, come from and are completed through the university system. Most of the other research is done at these medical and pharma companies themselves, where they literally test and report on their own laboratory creations funded by taxpayer dollars in the 100’s of billions; labeled as research and development (R&D) grants. Free money…

The FDA, as an integral and completely controlled regulatory agency of the syndicate, sweeps in for “public” good and consumption, placing its required stamp of approval on these harmful and deadly pharmaceutical drugs without ever testing any of them itself, instead relying on the “integrity” of its own syndicate corporations (combination/confederation/conspiracy) to promote and advocate its own portion of the syndicated monopoly. The word “public” is just another definition of E Pluribus Unum – from many voices, one false consensus-based opinion (out of many, one), where the voices of the many are never heard by the dictator-ship sailing us all into oblivion. For it is the opinion of the syndicate in the end that retains the right to possess the only opinion that has any “authority”.

Massive amounts of taxpayer money ends up in the university system as well, mostly hidden from the public within investment funds and touted as research grants, not to mention unreasonably high tuition rates to pay for it all. The syndicate creates the requirement of education to enter into industry, and so it can charge anything it wishes for a diploma allowing one to be employable in its syndicate. Of course the government is always listed as a patent holder of whatever novel disease or counterpart medical breakthrough, drug, or vaccine is created through the education/research part of the syndicate, for it supplies a direct link to the wallets of all the taxpayers of the United States. And that is the ultimate power of all – the power of the purse. But the purposeful side-effect of this syndicate insures a steady influx of patients that are made sick by its forced monopoly on all things food, health, medical, and pharmaceutical. And the syndicate protects itself through its total control of the BAR associations that in turn control the courts and thus public opinion. In essence, the population are mere guinea pigs for the syndicate, suffering and sometimes reporting negative side-effects only after drugs are already approved as “safe and effective” by the stage-play act known as the FDA.

The correct legal term for this fact, ironically, is that we are indeed legal patients of the syndicate. We allow the syndicate to use us exactly as they wish: as test-subjects. And without legal remedy of complaint due to the syndication and limitation of those legal avenues and the associations that run and regulate them, we are indeed merely a population of full-time patients:

PATIENT, adjective pa’shent. [Latin patiens.] 1. Having the quality of enduring evils without murmuring or fretfulness; sustaining afflictions of body or mind with fortitude, calmness or christian submission to the divine will; as a patient person, or a person of patient temper. It is followed by or before the evil endured; as patient of labor or pain; patient of heat or cold. 2. Not easily provoked; calm under the sufferance of injuries or offenses; not revengeful. 3. Persevering; constant in pursuit or exertion; calmly diligent. Whatever I have done is due to patient thought. 4. Not hasty; not over eager or impetuous; waiting or expecting with calmness or without discontent(noun) A person or thing that received impressions from external agents; he or that which is passively affected. Malice is a passion so impetuous and precipitate, that it often involves the agent and the patient 1. A person diseased or suffering bodily indisposition. It is used in relation to the physician; as, the physician visits his patient morning and evening. 2. It is sometimes used absolutely for a sick person. It is wonderful to observe how inapprehensive these patients are of their disease. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary)

–=–

We, the citizen-patients seem to have no inkling that our collective disease (political, mental, and physical) is purposefully caused and carefully managed by the syndicate, and that the syndicate is the disease of government. This gives new definition to the concept of “managed healthcare.” Instead, we can behold an abused and decimated population base that is so ill and not of right mind that perhaps it cannot muster the mental and physical response to fight back or seek revenge. And so the viscous cycle of disease continues as a profitable business-as-usual model under the syndicate, and the “people” remain hopelessly beholden to its authority as nothing more than mental patients.

–=–
How Attorneys Project The Syndicate
By Controlling Imput And Output Data
–=–

 The concept and goals of what is called advocacy are not at all dissimilar in function to what is today known by title as lobbyists, pundits, or political shills. An attorney, also known as an advocate or agent, literally re-presents some person or thing within an official capacity (an artificial realm of legal) in order to attempt to legitimize and sway opinions in favor of that subject matter. An advocate’s duty is to shift public opinion in order to create a normalcy bias and thus a general acceptance to the object of his or her advocacy.

So how does the syndicate utilize advocates in its total control system?

To start, the majority of our legislature (the law-makers) are generally attorneys, all pledged to the same private BAR association. Many of our presidents, including Obama, have been pledged attorneys as well. Likewise, most governors, and of course all legal persons in the Judicial Branch and Justice System are now required to be BAR member attorneys, while the Supreme Court of the United States generally refuses to hear non-BAR presented cases. Sometimes we forget that a member of some thing is also an advocate of that thing, for without that fictional thing, their fictional legal title would not exist. And so having BAR members as advocates of an International Bar Association full of advocate-attorneys working in syndication as the law-makers, executive force, and judicial overseer seems to be an obvious combination and confederacy with just a cursory glance. Our government is full of advocates and is thus in a severe epidemic state of conflict of interest. And the rest are bankers, doctors, accountants, and other professionals that hold their credentials and titles only because of and on behalf of the fictional institutions within the syndicate, creating not a government but an advocacy group posing as government – a simulation of legitimacy and of reality.

In other words, by default, any person with a diploma and job title that requires a college “education” must therefore hold (confirm) the fraudulent syndicate and government to be legitimate while being an unwitting advocate of the education system that bestows the allowance to be titled. Any person with a vested interest in some thing will always advocate for that thing, especially if their power and authority (credentials) stem solely from that very thing – the creator of those credentials. And enticing us as prostitutes with a bit of syndicated money helps ensure advocacy. Institutionalized “professionals” can seldom be expected to bite the hand and source of their own fraudulent existence as titled and credentialed professionals within the syndicate. Their very careers depend upon the existence and continuity of the syndicate, without which their flattering titles would hold no meaning or authority. They are literally professed as being experts, thus the term professional. If you understand this, you understand the power of the syndicate over morals, ethics, reason, and logic, which are no longer contemplations of men but rather defined concepts of the syndicate, their true meaning squashed by statute and legalese. The syndicate, for all intents and purposes, is the god of such concepts. The syndicate is the creator of titled gentry such as doctors, lawyers, pharmacists, CEO’s, and politicians. And so the monopoly extends not only over industry, but over the ethical and moral capacity and general operating procedure of those industries, including government itself.

The syndicate then places its paid, mind controlled advocates into its various controlled institutions, such as education and medicine.

From these places of perceived credibility and monopolized authority, through officially syndicate-credentialed scientists, biologists, professors, teachers, and research specialists, the syndicate can literally make anything happen, get anything approved, make anything appear and be defined as moral and ethical, and create any exception and acceptation to any rule or code (legal exemption) it wishes. It can do this simply because its advocates are everywhere within these institutions, ensuring pro-syndicate cause and effect models to create the desired “public opinion,” E Pluribus Unum,without question. They are the presidents, the faculty, the doctorates, the legal council, the regulators, the professors, the professionals, and the go-betweens.

The word advocate is defined as:

AD’VOCATE, noun [Latin advocatus, from advoco, to call for, to plead for; of ad and voco, to call. See vocal.] 1. advocate in its primary sense, signifies, one who pleads the cause of another in a court of civil law. Hence, 2. One who pleads the cause of another before any tribunal or judicial court, as a barrister in the English courts. We say, a man is a learned lawyer and an able advocate In Europe, advocates have different titles, according to their particular duties. Consistorial advocates, in Rome, appear before the Consistory, in opposition to the disposal of benefices. Elective advocates are chosen by a bishop, abbot, or chapter, with license from the prince. Feudal advocates were of a military kind, and to attach them to the church, had grants of land, with power to lead the vassals of the church war. Fiscal advocates, in ancient Rome, defended causes in which the public revenue was concerned. Juridical advocates became judges, in consequence of their attending causes in the earl’s court. Matricular advocates defended the cathedral churches. Military advocates were employed by the church (government) to defend it by arms, when force gave law to Europe. Some advocates were called nominative, from their being nominated by the pope or king; some regular, from their being qualified by a proper course of study. Some were supreme; others, subordinate. Advocate, in the German polity, is a magistrate, appointed in the emperor’s name, to administer justice. Faculty of advocates, in Scotland, is a society of eminent lawyers, who practice in the highest courts, and who are admitted members only upon the severest examination, at three different times. It consists of about two hundred members, and from this body are vacancies on the bench usually supplied. Lord advocate in Scotland, the principal crown lawyer, or prosecutor of crimes. Judge advocate in courts martial, a person who manages the prosecution. In English and American courts, advocates are the same as counsel, or counselors. In England, they are of two degrees, barristers and serjeants; the former, being apprentices or learners, cannot, by ancient custom, be admitted serjeants, till of sixteen years standing. 3. One who defends, vindicates, or espouses a cause, by argument; one who is friendly to; as, an advocate for peace, or for the oppressed. In scripture, Christ is called an advocate for his people. We have an advocate with the father. 1John 2:1. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary)

AD’VOCATE – (verb transitive) To plead in favor of; to defend by argument, before a tribunal; to support or vindicate. Those who advocate a discrimination. The Duke of York advocated the amendment. The Earl of Buckingham advocated the original resolution. The idea of a legislature, consisting of a single branch, though advocated by some, was generally reprobated… A part only of the body, whose cause be advocates, coincide with him in judgment. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary)

ADVOCATE –  See Judge-Advocate. An assistant ; an associate in conducting a lawsuit. A person who makes a profession of presenting cases orally. Of advocates, or (as we more generally call them) counsel, there are two species or degrees: barristers and sergeants. In the United States no distinction is made between an advocate and an attorney. (–W.C. Anderson 1889 Dictionary of Law)

FACULTY – noun [Latin facultas, from facio, to make.] 1. That power of the mind or intellect which enables it to receive, revive or modify perceptions; as the faculty of seeing, of hearing, of imagining, of remembering, etc.: or in general, the faculties may be called the powers or capacities of the mind. 2. The power of doing any thing; ability3. The power of performing any action, natural, vital or animal. The vital faculty is that by which life is preserved. 4. Facility of performance; the peculiar skill derived from practice, or practice aided by nature; habitual skill or ability; dexterity; adroitness; knack. One man has a remarkable faculty of telling a story; another, of inventing excuses for misconduct; a third, of reasoning; a fourth, of preaching. 5. Personal quality; disposition or habit, good or ill. 6. Power; authority9. Privilege; a right or power granted to a person by favor or indulgence, to do what by law he may not do; as the faculty of marrying without the bans being first published, or of ordaining a deacon under age. The archbishop of Canterbury has a court of faculties, for granting such privileges or dispensations. 10. In colleges, the masters and professors of the several sciences. One of the members or departments of a university. In most universities there are four faculties; of art, including humanity and philosophy; of theology; of medicine; and of law. In America, the faculty of a college or university consists of the president, professors and tutors. The faculty of advocates, in Scotland, is a respectable body of lawyers who plead in all causes before the Courts of Session, Justiciary and Exchequer. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary)

COUNSELOR, noun 1. Any person who gives advice; but properly one who is authorized by natural relationship, or by birth, office or profession, to advise another in regard to his future conduct and measures. Ahithophel was Davids counselor. His mother was his counselor to do wickedly. 2Chronicles 22:1. In Great Britain, the peers of the realm are hereditary counselor of the crown. 2. The members of a counsel; one appointed to advise a king or chief magistrate, in regard to the administration of the government. 3. One who is consulted by a client in a law case; one who gives advice in relation to a question of law; one whose profession is to give advice in law, and manage causes for clients. Privy counselor is a member of a privy counsel. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary)

COUNSEL, noun [Latin , to consult; to ask, to assail.] 1. Advice; opinion, or instruction, given upon request or otherwise, for directing the judgment or conduct of another; opinion given upon deliberation or consultation. Every purpose is established by counsel Proverbs 20:5. Thou hast not hearkened to my counsel 2 Chronicles 25:16. 2. Consultation; interchange of opinions. We took sweet counsel together. Psalms 55:14. 3. Deliberation; examination of consequences. They all confess that, in the working of that first cause, counsel is used, reason followed, and a way observed. 4. Prudence; deliberate opinion or judgment, or the faculty or habit of judging with caution. O how comely is the wisdom of old men, and understanding and counsel to men of honor. Ecclus. 25. The law shall perish from the priest, and counsel from the ancients. Ezekiel 7:26. 5. In a bad sense, evil advice or designs; art; machination. The counsel of the froward is carried headlong. Job 5:13. 6. Secrecy; the secrets entrusted in consultation; secret opinions or purposes. Let a man keep his own counsel 7. In a scriptural sense, purpose; design; will; decree. What thy counsel determined before to be done. Acts 4:28. To show the immutability of his counsel Hebrews 6:17. 8. Directions of Gods word. Thou shalt guide me by thy counsel Psalms 73:24. 9. The will of God or his truth and doctrines concerning the way of salvation. I have not shunned to declare to you all the counsel of God. Acts 20:27. 10. Those who give counsel in law; any counselor or advocate, or any number of counselors, barristers or sergeants; as the plaintiffs counsel or the defendants counsel. The attorney-general and solicitor-general are the kings counsel. In this sense, the word has no plural; but in the singular number, is applicable to one or more persons. – (verb transitive) [Latin] 1. To give advice or deliberate opinion to another for the government of his conduct; to advise. I counsel thee to buy of me gold tried in the fire. Revelations 3. 2. To exhort, warn, admonish, or instruct. We ought frequently to counsel our children against the vices of the age. They that will not be counseled, cannot be helped. 3. To advise or recommend; as, to counsel a crime. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary)

–=–

Note here that the word “god” and the word king, magistrate, prince, and pope are one in the same, explaining the repeated Bible references above. In other words, these counselors are placed throughout the syndicate’s institutions to specifically advocate for the will of the magistrates (gods) of the syndicate. This use of a religious concept in government and its frightening reality will be further defined below.

It is quite difficult to comprehend the fact that the University system is indeed packed full of attorneys (advocates) and counselors. After all, reasonably speaking, it would seem fairly odd that so many attorney/advocates should be required within a university, other than perhaps in the legal studies department. But this misconception stems from a total lack of comprehension regarding the true intent and purpose of the education system, and more to the point its important roles played out within the syndicate by these attorney advocates and counselors to maintain its illusion of legitimacy and authority. A simple online search uncovers the many attorney-based, often BAR membership required jobs available within the university structure. And because of this revelation, we receive a new understanding of just what this organized advocacy group we call the BAR Associations of the world really entails. For advocates are not simply lawyers, they are also accountants, financial officers, statisticians, councilors, teachers, expert witnesses, fellows, presidents, legislators, professionals, prefects, principles, etc…

Take for example this recent job posting for the well known medical university institution (syndication) of John’s Hopkins University:

“The Johns Hopkins University offers a one-year fellowship to a graduate of an accredited U.S. Law School. Commencing on or about October 16, 2012, the Fellow will spend one year working at the Office of the Vice President and General Counsel. The Vice President and General Counsel is the chief legal officer for the Johns Hopkins University. With a staff of nine attorneys, the Office of the Vice President and General Counsel provides legal representation and advice to the University and its trustees, officers, and employees acting on its behalf.”

“The office provides advice on a broad range of legal issues affecting the University, including labor and employment, government contracts and grants, litigation, investigations, faculty appointments, student issues, non-profit law, academic freedom, privacy, intellectual property, technology transfer, clinical practice, safety and environmental law, research and other compliance, health law and other legal issues relating to the School of Medicine, philanthropy, investments, real estate, international issues, business transactions, financing and tax matters. The attorneys prepare and negotiate contracts to which the University is a party. The office drafts and reviews proposed University policies. The office represents the University in litigation and before regulatory agencies. As in-house counsel, the office attorneys are in the unique position of being part of the goal-setting and strategic planning for the University. This role gives office attorneys the opportunity to do a significant amount of preventative lawyering, including running training programs and assisting with University compliance with federal, state, and local obligations. The Fellowship position provides recent law graduates an opportunity to work closely with all of the attorneys in the Office. The Fellow can expect to do legal research and prepare memoranda of law; review and draft agreements and procedures as well as litigation materials; and attend meetings related to the work assigned. The attorneys will review the Fellow’s work closely and meet with him or her to provide feedback. By providing exposure to the work and challenges of a university counselor’s office, the Fellowship is an excellent opportunity for those with an interest in the field of higher education law or any of the substantive areas in which we practice.”

SOURCE: http://attorneyjobmaryland.blogspot.com/2012/08/law-fellow-job-at-johns-hopkins.html#.VEDD_hAgtH4

–=–

Well gosh golly, I can’t imagine why so many attorney’s are needed at a school… but I can imagine the billable hours they must accumulate. I wonder why tuition is really as high as it is in most universities? Any ideas…?

And in point of fact, is the reader at all comfortable with the roles described here where attorneys are part of the “goal-setting and strategic planning for the University?

These advocates are the people you see on government panels as the invited guest speakers, often referred to as “experts” or “expert witnesses”. In other words, they are PAID WITNESSES! They did not actually witness anything regarding the case. They are there simply to promote and advocate for the syndicate to keep business as usual and to counter any actual evidence to their contrary. If the syndicate needs an expert witness, you can be assured it calls upon its roster of advocates within the education or other institutionalized (syndicated) systems. And any former employee of the education system that relied on grant money can attest that with the appointed position and research grants allotted to advocates, their positive advocacy for (and never against) the university system and all other parts of the syndicate involved must be maintained. So many good men and women with syndicated titles have lost their good name and standing within for simply criticizing the syndicate for what it really is – a confirmed fraud promoting institutionalized fraud. And they find out the hard way just how organized the fraud and crime really is only after losing everything the syndicate bestowed upon them in the first place, from research grants to reputation, while having been completely severed (black-balled) with regards to access to employment and syndication.

Advocates can appear in so many different ways, and are generally considered to be re-presentations of public opinion. They represent the people E Pluribus Unum style (from many opinions, one opinion), and through their official and legal capacity as attorneys they advocate for the criminal syndicate while pretending to be concerned parents, non-partial witnesses, and invited impartial experts. With countless cases of fraud and conspiracy decking the courts regarding doctors, judges, scientists, and other advocates of the syndicate, one would be hard-pressed to believe a single thing that comes out of the mouth of any “expert” presented by government or its syndicated corporate monopolies of medical, pharmaceutical, scientific, regulatory, legal, or financial advocacy.

For the court’s opinion is alas constituted in finality as the now official “public opinion”, creating even a monopoly on opinion itself through consensus. And the advocate as “expert witness” is key to ensuring the triumph of this syndicated opinion over any contrary outside notion.

OPINION, noun opin’yon. [Latin opinio, from opinor, to thing, Gr., Latin suppono.] 1. The judgment which the mind forms of any proposition, statement, theory or event, the truth or falsehood of which is supported by a degree of evidence that renders it probably, but does not produce absolute knowledge or certainty. It has been a received opinion that all matter is comprised in four elements. This opinion is proved by many discoveries to be false. From circumstances we form opinions respecting future events. OPINION is when the assent of the understanding is so far gained by evidence of probability, that it rather inclines to one persuasion than to another, yet not without a mixture of uncertainty or doubting. 2. The judgment or sentiments which the mind forms of persons or their qualities. We speak of a good opinion a favorable opinion a bad opinion a private opinion and public or general opinion etc. Friendship gives a man a peculiar right and claim to the good opinion of his friend. 3. Settled judgment or persuasion; as religious opinions; political opinion 4. Favorable judgment; estimation. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary)

–=–

To verbally or in writing opinion a subject is to magically transform through word magic often devious and misleading concepts into a tangible (written) official thing (legal law), making that concept accepted as normal no matter how ridiculous or despised it may be. Legal law can only be proven to exist via court opinion. The court transforms through opinion and thus final judgement falsities and lies into “facts” of law – institutionalized and syndicated bullshit, if you will. And the court is the representation of the public, as “the People” vs. everything and anyone. It thus creates opinion as a fiction of law. Yes, it exists only as a fiction. And a fiction only exists with belief and consent to its validity by the “public”, which is of course re-presented as “government”. Fiction is literally nothing more than a confirmed and accepted fraud (lie).

And government is a fiction…

As we can read, institutional thoughts need not be proven (as by scientific and medical research and through deliberation) to become what is then the “official” legal opinion of the syndicate, which then disseminates its own court-ruled opinion as “public opinion”. You could call this the doctrinal religion of the state, preached and taught by advocate profess-ors of the syndicate.

So many drugs that are labeled safe and effective by the regulatory portion of the syndicate called FDA are often years later revealed by the many maimed and harmed “patients” within the public or general population as extremely life-threatening, poisonous, cancer-causing, or as causing any number of other serious “side-effects” not listed in the syndicated pretrials, studies, and inserts of those drugs. And the FDA labels them as unsafe or ineffective only after many “patients” have been seriously damaged or died by them after initial approval, during the time period when the FDA’s official opinion (confirmed fraud) was that they were “safe and effective”.

This consensus of thought is often reached by committee, which generally consists of advocates (experts) paid by the syndicate to promote its lies. These advocates are everywhere, attorneys acting as agents of the syndicate while also playing the part of school teacher or professor, scientist or pharmacologist, expert or professional, etc.

And just what is a “committee”, Mr. Black, when considering that a syndicate is defined as a “university committee”?

Is it really just an advocacy group of attorneys disguised as caring professionals with the public’s best interest at heart?

(Hint: The syndicate is re-presented as public! It is the public!!!)

COMMITTEE – In practice. An assembly or board of persons to whom the consideration or management of any matter is committed or referred by some court. An individual or body to whom others have delegated or committed a particular duty, or who have taken on themselves to perform it in the expectation of their act being confirmed by the body they profess to represent or act for.  The term is especially applied to the person or persons who are invested, by order of the proper court, with the guardianship of the person and estate of one who has been adjudged a lunatic. In parliamentary law. A portion of a legislative body, comprising one or more members, who are charged with the duty of examining some matter specially referred to them by the house, or of deliberating upon it, and reporting to the house the result of their investigations or recommending a course of action. A committee may be appointed for one special occasion, or it may be appointed to deal with all matters which may be referred to it during a whole session or during the life of the body. In the latter case, it is called a “standing committee.” It is usually composed of a comparatively small number of members, but may include the whole house. (–Black’s 2nd Edition)

CONFIRM – To complete or establish that which was imperfect or uncertain; to ratify what has been done without authority or insufficiently. To confirm is to make firm that which was before infirm. (–Black’s 2nd Edition)

CONFIRMATION – A contract by which that which was infirm, imperfect, or subject to be avoided is made firm and unavoidable. A conveyance of an estate or right in esse, whereby a voidable estate is made sure and unavoidable, or whereby a particular estate is increased. (–Black’s 2nd Edition)

–=–

To be clear, a committee is another word for combination or confederacy (conspiracy). It is a committee of persons (secretly or openly representing the syndicate), all of whom work within the syndicate monopoly, while appearing to the public at large as a meeting of opposing sides. But in reality, a committee is mere formality to fool the viewing public (which contains no actual legal voice) into believing that the outcome of the committee’s opinion is in the best interest of the population (the many), and not in fact just for the continuity and profit of the syndicate (the one). This is like trusting the opinion of a bunch (combination) of oil company executives who meet in committee to decide the correct course to take for an oil spill. The syndicate has one goal as a corporation: PROFIT AND GAIN. To achieve its end, it must create a false sense of consensus through committee advocacy. So perhaps it is easier to comprehend the fraudulent nature of committee hearings in government if you just realize that every member stands to profit from within the syndicate from his or her bestowed title, and that the general population is ultimately just the taxpaying customer and consumer of the syndicate monopoly – the patients of the syndicate.

Ultimately, this government stage-play is just that – an act. The statute laws created are even called Acts. And of course everyone should know by now that actors in a play are nothing more than paid, professional liars. Nothing more, nothing less. Advocates engage in the art of lying. Their term of art is always double-speak. They lie as best they can simply to ensure that the act goes on in syndication without end (think: The Truman Show)…

PLAYER – noun One who plays in any game or sport. 1. An idler. 2. An actor of dramatic scenes; one whose occupation is to imitate characters on the stage. 3. A mimic. 4. One who performs on an instrument of music. 5. A gamester. 6. One that acts a part in a certain manner.

ACTOR – noun 1. He that acts or performs; an active agent. 2. He that represents a character or acts a part in a play; a stage player. 3. Among civilians, an advocate or proctor in civil courts or causes.

AGENT, adjective Acting; opposed to patient, or sustaining action; as, the body agent [Little used.]

AGENT, noun 1. An actor; one that exerts power, or has the power to act; as, a moral agent 2. An active power or cause; that which has the power to produce an effect; as, heat is a powerful agent 3. A substitute, deputy, or factor; one entrusted with the business of another; an attorney; a minister.

PERFORMER – noun One that performs any thing, particularly in an art; as a good performer on the violin or organ; a celebrated performer in comedy or tragedy, or in the circus.

PORTRAYER – noun One who paints, draws to the life or describes.

(–All definitions from Webster’s 1828 Dictionary)

–=–

https://i0.wp.com/lawrencecconnolly.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/masks.jpg
The true nature of every politician, as agents of the syndicate.

–=–
The Science Fiction of Truth:
Practice Makes Perfect
–=–

Doctors practice “medicine”.

Nurses practice “health”.

Lawyers practice “law”.

Bankers practice “banking”.

Preachers practice “religion”.

Teacher’s practice “education”.

Somewhere along the way tools such as the “scientific method” were trans-mutated into the institutions of their name, such as the institution of “science”. This created the doctrine of “science,” as if the tool of measuring and arriving at a scientific theory was ever meant to arrive at a final conclusion. This doctrine of written words is what is now called “science”. It does not teach the method as much as it teaches a syndicated preference of the perceived outcome of the method. Science is often taught as past discoveries that should not be challenged or improved upon, for new data is inconvenient to the established doctrinal models. This, of course, is nothing new. The science of Earth was that it was officially flat, until the doctrine was changed into the current description of round. It was heresy to claim anything else, for the religious government of science is of God, not method. Nothing has really changed. And the industry and syndicated education of science ignores the ethical lessons learned along the way in order to create a purely unscientific simulation of the scientific method, making it possible for the syndicate to legalize the most horrific of what it refers to as “scientific practices.”

And this model of taking an adjective or verb (to educate/scientific) and turning it into a noun/name/title (the institution of education and of science) was essential in the process of institutionalizing every uncontrollable action of man. For it is now illegal to help another in need without license from the state to practice that help as a profession. And in order to get that license, one must pay tuition and get credentialed by the syndicate so that one’s charity becomes an employable profit model for the corporate biosphere.

Notice the difference between the verb and noun (name) forms of the word practice below, from Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language:

PRAC’TICE, noun [Gr. to act, to do, to make; Eng. to brook, and broker; Latin fruor, for frugor or frucor, whence fructus, contracted into fruit; frequens.] 1. Frequent or customary actions; a succession of acts of a similar kind or in a like employment; as the practice of rising early or of dining late; the practice of reading a portion of Scripture morning and evening; the practice of making regular entries of accounts; the practice of virtue or vice. Habit is the effect of practice 2. Use; customary use. Obsolete words may be revived when they are more sounding or significant than those in practice 3. Dexterity acquired by use. [Unusual.] 4. Actual performance; distinguished from theory. There are two functions of the soul, contemplation and practice according to the general division of objects, some of which only entertain our speculations, others employ our actions. 5. Application of remedies; medical treatment of diseases. Two physicians may differ widely in their practice 6. Exercise of any profession; as the practice of law or of medicine; the practice of arms. 7. Frequent use; exercise for instruction or discipline. The troops are daily called out for practice 8. Skillful or artful management; dexterity in contrivance or the use of means; art; stratagem; artifice; usually in a bad sense. He sought to have that by practice which he could not by prayer. [This use of the word is genuine; from Latin experior. It is not a mistake as Johnson supposes. See the Verb.] 9. A rule in arithmetic, by which the operations of the general rules are abridged in use.

PRAC’TICE, verb transitive [From the noun. The orthography of the verb ought to be the same as of the noun; as in notice and to notice.] 1. To do or perform frequently, customarily or habitually; to perform by a succession of acts; as, to practice gaming; to practice fraud or deception; to practice the virtues of charity and beneficence; to practice hypocrisy. Isaiah 32:1. Many praise virtue who do not practice it. 2. To use or exercise any profession or art; as, to practice law or medicine; to practice gunnery or surveying. 3. To use or exercise for instruction, discipline or dexterity. [In this sense, the verb is usually intransitive.] 4. To commit; to perpetrate; as the horrors practiced at Wyoming. 5. To use; as a practiced road. [Unusual.]

PRAC’TICE, verb intransitive To perform certain acts frequently or customarily, either for instruction, profit, or amusement; as, to practice with the broad sword; to practice with the rifle. 1. To form a habit of acting in any manner. They shall practice how to live secure…  3. To try artifices. Others, by guilty artifice and arts – Of promis’d kindness, practic’d on our hearts. 4. To use evil arts or stratagems5. To use medical methods or experiments. I am little inclined to practice on others, and as little that others should practice on me. 6. To exercise any employment or profession. A physician has practiced many years with success.

ARTIFICE – noun [Latin artificium, from ars, art, and facio, to make.] 1. Stratagem; an artful or ingenious device, in a good or bad sense. In a bad sense, it corresponds with trick, or fraud. 2. Art; trade; skill acquired by science or practice.

–=–

Title is another word for artifice. These titles of doctor, attorney, teacher, etc. are nothing but terms of art, or artifices. They are fictional creations of the syndicate, used to separate the educated from the uneducated (indoctrinated vs. un-indoctrinated). But the education institution is not a verb but a noun, signifying the false mark of the beast through degree and diploma giving legal (not lawful) permission and license from the state to act under a title, and thus to act in the name (noun) of the state.

A license has one and only one meaning – to have permission to do an otherwise illegal act.

The syndicate versus the people…

Fiction versus reality…

VERSUS – (prep) mid-15c., in legal case names, denoting action of one party against another, from Latin versusturned toward or against,” from past participle of vertere (frequentative versare) “to turn, turn back, be turned, convert, transform, translate, be changed…German werden, Old English weorðanto become” (for sense, compare turn into); Welsh gwerthyd “spindle, distaff;” Old Irish frithagainst“).

–=–

Now you might comprehend the strange-but-true nature of science fiction elements for the scripted characters called “agents” in movies such as The Matrix and The Adjustment Bureau, the everyone-else-is-an-agent fiction of The Truman Show, and even the real life fictional agents of the syndicate; the attorney advocates called Internal Revenue Agents, Federal Bureau of Investigation agents, and so forth. Whether it be in the fiction of movies or within the fiction of law, these agents of the syndicated government always seem to show up when one of us gets out of line and somehow manages to break through the barriers set forth by the syndicate and its monopolies. If you can’t beat them, accuse them. Call them tax-avoiders or terrorists! Set them up with prostitutes or sabotage them with well-placed kiddy porn. Confine and confiscate all competition! Anything and everyone, or at least their reputation, may and must be sacrificed for the good of the syndicate. For the syndicate judges all, and the judgement is always pro-syndicate.

As portrayed in these fantasies, anyone can ultimately be an agent; an advocate undercover, acting and performing as one of the “patients” until his stage-call is exposed. All of the agents in the Truman show were of course paid employees who participated in the fraud and advocated for it because it paid them to act against their own interest and their moral objections.

The syndicate is the main employer!

The power of the purse…

It is important to note here that this syndicate was formed at the inception of the United States. And while it was not so technologically organized as it is today, the confederation and then constitution of this nation created a virtually unlimited potential for the central syndicate to grow and expand; a nest of red tape and protections from which the syndicate was berthed into America (the states). Each state of the “Union” of this confederation we call the United States was literally and by force required to confirm the fraudulent constitution of the United States central federal government in their own constitutions. States had no choice in the matter, for without confirmation of the supreme and sovereign authority of the central federal syndicate, they would not be allowed to even become states of that union. You can verify this in your own state constitution and enabling acts. For states are nothing more than acts of congress, confirmed by the president of the syndicate.

The act of confirmation is more simply defined as the conveyance of the right of estate.

CONVEYTo pass or transmit the title to property from one to another; to transfer property or the title to property by deed or instrument under seal. To convey real estate is, by an appropriate instrument, to transfer the legal title to it from the present owner to another. Convey relates properly to the disposition of real property, not to personal. (–Black’s 2nd Edition)

CONVEYANCE – In pleading. Introduction or inducement. In real property law. The transfer of the title of land from one person or class of persons to another. An instrument in writing under seal, (anciently termed an “assurance,”) by which some estate or interest in lands is transferred from one person to another; such as a deed, mortgage, etc. Conveyance includes every instrument in writing by which any estate or interest in real estate is created, aliened, mortgaged, or assigned, or by which the title to any real estate may be affected in law or equity, except last wills and testaments, leases for a term not exceeding three years, and executory contracts for the sale or purchase of lands. (–Black’s 2nd Edition)

–=–

As hard as it is to admit and as painful as it may be perceived to the patriotic reader, the states had to confirm the fraud (confederation) of the central municipality of Washington D.C. as being the supreme power. No state can exist in the United States (union) without this confirmation regarding the sovereignty of the United States corporation and its constitution (debt compact). There is no right of succession within states, as the Civil war proved without doubt and as each state constitution now plainly instructs, naming states as inseparable from the union. To confirm some fictional thing like the United States is to confirm that particular fraud as the “law of the land”. While fraud is avoidable, a confirmed fraud is in turn unavoidable.

A constitution is a compact (contract) and consent to evil (fiction). The fraud becomes the government, just as the de facto United States became the federation, and thus the formation of the syndicate and its stated authority is also unavoidable as it exists only under the government’s perceived and syndicated authority. Confirmation is the action of making or turning what is unlawful and thus avoidable into a legally permissible and thus unavoidable fraud by consensual contract. The states of the union, therefore, as post-civil war corporate creations (admissions) of the union, are also mere fictional frauds, held together by nothing more than the implied consent of the inhabitants of each state – whom of course have been given a healthy dose of complete and total ignorance of these facts by the syndicate and its forced government education system, where it subjects its subjects to “history” indoctrination.

Centralized education was a requirement in the constitution of all states, not a choice.

Advocates (attorneys) do well as partners in the fraud and crime, for their whole job and lifestyle is one with a mere fictional title of limited nobility promoting the lie.

Dissenters are allowed to speak in controlled unofficial forums, providing the illusion of freedom of speech and political participation but with no actual voice (authority). An activist may never speak or present in committee or with official opinion in any seriously considered capacity. The minority always fails, while the ignorant majority lives in its own shit-pile of consequence.

E Pluribus Unum is a powerful tool and the foundational creed of the United States’ organized criminal syndicate. And so it was that the syndicate was incrementally formed and evolved over time, centralizing all power by confirming the corporate institutions and private associations that oversee all things without exception from within this wicked combination.

–=–
Defining The Syndicate
–=–

We must now dig further to discover that the purpose of education is not to educate, but to syndicate false information that ensures the syndicates’ ability to continue in perpetuity to be the syndication vehicle of information and regulations. In short, the syndicate exists only to perpetuate its own existence, and for no other purpose, rewarding its advocates along the way.

When something cannot be decided in committee, the syndicate may refer it to a circus parlor trick called a “conference”. A conference is simply a congress of syndicate advocates drawn together in fraud to reach a predetermined consensus.

CONFERENCEA meeting of several persons for deliberation, for the interchange of opinion, or for the removal of differences or disputes. Thus, a meeting between a counsel and solicitor to advise on the cause of their client. In the practice of legislative bodies, when the two houses cannot agree upon a pending measure, each appoints a committee of “conference,” and the committees meet and consult together for the purpose of removing differences, harmonizing conflicting views, and arranging a compromise which will be accepted by both houses.

–=–

Here, in conference, a bunch of syndicate representatives (advocates) congregate and use word magic and trickery to “remove differences of opinion or disputes” and to advocate the “harmonizing of conflicting views” that the real public might express through non-syndicated activism – the people’s individual voices that are virtually never actually heard, and are instead worked around. Thus, through conference and via dispute resolution, an official sounding deliberation is conferred by the government regulatory bodies of the syndicate so that its profitable corporations may prosper in combinations never comprehended or commissioned by its patients – the public at large.

The voices of decent and reason are squashed in conference and committee.

E Pluribus Unum

Some call this the forming of “consensus”. Others refer to it as the utilization of the Delphi technique. Whatever you call it, the syndicate is nothing if not the great decider.

Anciently, this same system of Delphic decisions of the gods (magistrates) were instituted by the church, which was and still is the state without separation. For legislation is simply the religious civil doctrine of the state – the acts of a 24 hour a day stage-play.

SYNOD – A meeting or assembly of ecclesiastical persons concerning religion; being the same thing, in Greek, as convocation in Latin. There are four kinds: (1) A general or universal synod or council, where bishops of all nations meet; (2) a national synod of the clergy of one nation only; (3) a provincial synod, where ecclesiastical persons of a province only assemble, being now what is called the “convocation;” (4) a diocesan synod, of those of one diocese. A synod in Scotland is composed of three or more presbyteries.

SYNODAL – A tribute or payment in money paid to the bishop or archdeacon by the inferior clergy, at the Easter visitation.

SYNODALES TESTES – Synods-men (corrupted into sidesmen) were the urban and rural deans, now the church-wardens.

–=–

And from these committees of the syndicate come its offspring, called the syllabus, for which the education system and its advocate “teachers” must follow as professor of that instruction. The syllabus is the end result of syllogism, which through committee and conference creates also a monopoly on logic, reason, and debate, so that the curriculum taught in schools and universities is the eventuality of the sole proprietary creation and fiction of the syndicate. The syllabus offers no freedom of thought or dissenting viewpoints, for it represents the opinion of the syndicate; of the public court.

SYLLABUS – A head-note; a note prefixed to the report of an adjudged case, containing an epitome or brief statement of the rulings of the court upon the point or points decided in the case.

SYLLOGISM – In logic. The full logical form of a single argument. It consists of three propositions, (two premises and the conclusion,) and these contain three terms, of which the two occurring in the conclusion are brought together in the premises by being referred to a common class.

SYNGRAPH – The name given by the canonists to deeds of which both parts were written on the same piece of parchment, with some word or letters of the alphabet written between them, through which the parchment was cut in such a manner as to leave half the word on one~part and half on the other. It thus corresponded to the chirograph or indenture of the common law. A deed or other written instrument under the hand and seal of all the parties.

SYNCOPARETo cut short, or pronounce things so as not to be understood.

–=–

Ultimately, the purpose of the syndicate is a simple one, though it requires the unprecedented organization of fraud and crime that we have thus-far revealed. Quite simply, the end goal is only the acquirement of total (tacitly implied) consent. And this is easiest achieved through false consensus: an ingenious but ultimately unreal state of manufactured consent through the founding principle of E Pluribus Unum

The etymology of these words are as follows:

CONSENSUAL (adj.) – 1754, “having to do with consent,” from stem of Latin consensus (see consensus) + -al (1). Meaning “by consent” is attested from 1800.

CONSENSUS (adj.) from 1854 as a term in physiology; 1861 of persons; from Latin consensusagreement, accord,” past participle of consentire (see consent). There is an isolated instance of the word from 1633.

CONSENT (v.) – from early 13c. from Old French consentir (12c.) “agree, comply,” from Latin consentirefeel together,” from com-with” (see com-) + sentireto feel” (see sense (n.)). “Feeling together,” hence, “agreeing, giving permission,” apparently a sense evolution that took place in French before the word reached English. Related: Consented; consenting. (noun.) c.1300, “approval,” also “agreement in sentiment, harmony,” from Old French consente, from consentir (see consent (v.)). Age of consent is attested from 1809.

–=–

Black’s Law 2nd edition reveals how we in the general population are tricked into said harmonious group agreement and false consensus through the use of implied consent, as doled out by the committees, conferences, and consensus opinions of the syndicate.

CONSENTA concurrence of wills. Express consent is that directly given, either lira voce (in voice) or in writing. Implied consent is that manifested by signs, actions, or facts, or by inaction or silence, which raise a presumption that the consent has been given. Consent in an act of reason, accompanied with deliberation, the mind weighing as in a balance the good or evil on each side.

–=–

With the implied consent of the entire population unum, Black’s 2nd explains what are the direct implications of this uninformed (unacknowledged) consent and how this falsely formed consensus creates the  implied authority of dictatorship:

IMPLIED POWERS – This term applies to the authority that a public official has due to the nature of their duties.

IMPLIED AUTHORITY – A term given to the power that an agent has or the authority under certain circumstances.

GENERALLY IMPLIEDTypical understanding or definition in an industry, organization, or trade of a common, customary practice, or meaning of a term.

OBLIGATION IMPLIED – This is the term given to an obligation that is inferred to be a duty due to the nature of the agreement.

IMPLIED ASSENT – Applied to the assent that is agreed to but has not been stated expressly.

IMPLIED CONTRACT – An agreement that is agreed upon but has not been put into words.

IMPLIED AGREEMENT – One inferred from the acts or conduct of the parties, instead of being expressed by them in written or spoken words; one inferred by the law where the conduct of the parties with reference to the subject-matter is such as to induce the belief that they intended to do that which their acts indicate they have done.

–=–

In short, we have an implied government, which uses an implied consent to an implied constitution to command implied authority and implied assent to its own statutes and opinions – all because of your own implied agreement (silence) to all of these implications. Your silence and lack of action is your tacit consent. This double-speak of ways to induce a false sense of agreement and thus consensus, is all based on one very fragile concept – faith. The syndicate can only continue in perpetuity if it has the belief of the people it dominates, suggesting its permissive and consensual authority of those same subjected and dominated people, and implying that the syndicated de facto government has legitimacy. Amazingly, government admits openly that it indeed is not legitimate – that it is a de facto (illegitimate/only by force) fiction of law. This is quite verifiable on your own. And yet the voter turn out shows very well that the religion of the state and its sovereignty doctrine reigns supreme.

There’s just one little problem with that word sovereignty. And thanks to the syndicate, the “educated” masses worship its meaning incorrectly and without understanding of its ultimate implied authority…

SOVEREIGN, adjective suv’eran. [We retain this babarous orthography from the Norman sovereign. The true spelling would be suveran from the Latin supernes, superus.] 1. Supreme in power; possessing supreme dominion; as a sovereign ruler of the universe. 2. Supreme; superior to all others; chief. God is the sovereign good of all who love and obey him. 3. Supremely efficacious; superior to all others; predominant; effectual; as a sovereign remedy. 4. Supreme; pertaining to the first magistrate of a nation; as sovereign authority. – (noun) suv’eran. 1. A supreme lord or ruler; one who possesses the highest authority without control. Some earthly princes, kings and emperors are sovereigns in their dominions. 2. A supreme magistrate; a king. 3. A gold coin of England, value (of) $4.44 (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary)

MAG’ISTRATE, noun [Latin magistratus, from magister, master; magis, major, and ster, Teutonic steora, a director; steoran, to steer; the principal director.] A public civil officer, invested with the executive government or some branch of it. In this sense, a king is the highest or first magistrate as is the President of the United States. But the word is more particularly applied to subordinate officers, as governors, intendants, prefects, mayors, justices of the peace, and the like. The magistrate must have his reverence; the laws their authority. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary)

–=–

Hmm… so our president, governors, mayors, and judges are all magistrates, which translates to masters. And all these fall under the notion of sovereignty as supreme rulers without control.

Dare we examine further the etymology of these words…?

In fact, isn’t to declare something supreme and sovereign actually to deify that thing as a god?

Surely not…

Well, first, how does Webster’s 1828 Dictionary define the word “god”?

GOD, noun 1. The Supreme Being; Jehovah; the eternal and infinite spirit, the creator, and the sovereign of the universe. GOD is a spirit; and they that worship him, must worship him in spirit and in truth. John 4:24. 2. A false god; a heathen deity; an idol. Fear not the gods of the Amorites. Judges 6:10. 3. A prince; a ruler; a magistrate or judge; an angel. 4. Any person or thing exalted too much in estimation, or deified and honored as the chief good. Whose god is their belly. Philippians 3:19. GOD, verb transitive To deify.

–=–

Uh-oh. This isn’t looking good… it seems Webster just hit the nail painfully on the head. Whereas he defines a magistrate as a president, governor, mayor, or judge, at the same time he defines a god as a magistrate. Of course the meaning is of a false god in idol worship, honored by a completely and deliberately dumbed down population under implied god-headedness. And so thanks to the combined efforts of the syndicate, the people don’t even know they are worshiping and supporting heathen false gods as their government officials with supreme and sovereign authority over them. This alone is proof of the power of the syndicate and its system of re-education.

It was Voltaire who said, “I want my lawyer, my tailor, my servants, even my wife to believe in God, because it means that I shall be cheated and robbed and cuckolded less often. … If God did not exist, it would be necessary to invent him.”

Well, the gods are re-invented every election cycle!

Etymologically speaking, we can see how this invention of a fictional state-god actually happened, and how it is used to make “patients” out of otherwise God-fearing men, who bend on one knee to the god that is government and its magistrates…

DEIFY – (v.)  mid-14c., from Old French deifier (13c.), from Late Latin deificare, from deificus “making godlike,” from Latin deus “god” (see Zeus) + -ficare, from facere “to make, to do” (see factitious). Related: Deified; deifying.

DEITY – (n.) c.1300, “divine nature;” late 14c., “a god,” from Old French deité, from Late Latin deitatem (nominative deitas) “divine nature,” coined by Augustine from Latin deus “god,” from PIE *deiwos (see Zeus).

GOD – (n.) Old English god “supreme being, deity; the Christian God; image of a god; godlike person,” from Proto-Germanic *guthan (cognates: Old Saxon, Old Frisian, Dutch god, Old High German got, German Gott, Old Norse guð, Gothic guþ), from PIE *ghut- “that which is invoked” (cognates: Old Church Slavonic zovo “to call,” Sanskrit huta- “invoked,” an epithet of Indra), from root *gheu(e)- “to call, invoke.”

MAGISTRATE – (n.) late 14c., “civil officer in charge of administering laws,” from Old French magistrat, from Latin magistratus “a magistrate, public functionary,” originally “magisterial rank or office,” from magistrare “serve as a magistrate,” from magister “chief, director” (see master). Related: Magistracy.

MASTER – (n.) late Old English mægester “one having control or authority,” from Latin magister (n.) “chief, head, director, teacher” (source of Old French maistre, French maître, Spanish and Italian maestro, Portuguese mestre, Dutch meester, German Meister), contrastive adjective (“he who is greater“) from magis (adv.) “more,”

FACTITIOUS – (adj.) 1640s, “made by or resulting from art, artificial,” from Latin factitius “artificial,” from factus “elaborate, artistic,” past participle adjective from facere “do” (source of French faire, Spanish hacer), from PIE root *dhe- “to put, to do” (cognates: Sanskrit dadhati “puts, places;” Avestan dadaiti “he puts;” Old Persian ada “he made;” Hittite dai- “to place;” Greek tithenai “to put, set, place;” Lithuanian deti “to put;” Polish dziać się “to be happening;” Russian delat’ “to do;” Old High German tuon, German tun, Old Saxon, Old English don “to do;” Old Frisian dua, Old Swedish duon, Gothic gadeths “a doing;” Old Norse dalidun “they did”). Related: Factitiously; factitiousness.

–=–

“Much in you is still man, and much in you is not yet man,
but a shapeless pigmy that walks asleep in the mist searching for its own awakening.”

–Kahlil Gibran, “The Prophet”

–=–

It is perhaps best to reveal the origin and etymology of such words rather than utilizing dumbed-down definitions from modern dictionaries offered to the students of that very system. For ironically, education is one word they don’t teach you in school!!!

To truly understand the purpose of education, we must cross over to and temporarily attempt to empathize with the elitist dark side of the syndicate so as to view this subject through the warped disposition of our controllers and handlers. Perhaps a better question than our initial title here would be:

What kind of education would a slave-master wish to impart upon his slaves, knowing that they can be made to love and yet perceive not the nature of their enslavement?

–=–
Programming The Matrix:
Examining The Language Code Of The Syndicate
–=–

And so we arrive back to our original question… How do you define what education really is?

Etymology, the study of the origin of words (http://etymonline.com), will best help us in our lofty endeavor:

EDUCATION (n.) – From the 1530s, “childrearing,” also “the training of animals,” from Middle French education (14c.) and directly from Latin educationem (nominative educatio) “a rearing, training,” noun of action from past participle stem of educare (see educate). Originally of instruction in social codes and manners; meaning “systematic schooling and training for work” is from 1610s.

–=–

Ok then… the training of animals it is. But who and what exactly do these elitist syndicate-men consider to be animals?

ANIMALISM (n.) – “the doctrine that man is a mere animal,” 1857, from animal + ism. Earlier, “exercise of animal faculties; physical exercise” (1831).

ANIMAL (n.) – From early 14c. (but rare before c.1600, and not in KJV, 1611), “any living creature” (including humans), from Latin animaleliving being, being which breathes,” neuter of animalisanimate, living; of the air,” from animabreath, soul; a current of air” (see animus, and compare deer). Drove out the older beast in common usage. Used of brutish humans from 1580s.

BEAST (n.) – c.1200, from Old French besteanimal, wild beast,” figuratively “fool, idiot” (11c., Modern French bête), from Vulgar Latin *besta, from Latin bestiabeast, wild animal,” of unknown origin. Used to translate Latin animal. Replaced Old English deor (see deer) as the generic word for “wild creature,” only to be ousted 16c. by animal. Of persons felt to be animal-like in various senses from early 13c. Of the figure in the Christian apocalypse story from late 14c.

ZOON (n.) – “animal form containing all elements of a typical organism of its group,” 1864, from Greek zoion “animal” (see zoo-).

POLITICAL (adj.) – From the 1550s, “pertaining to a polity, civil affairs, or government;” from Latin politicusof citizens or the state” (see politic (adj.)) + -al (1). Meaning “taking sides in party politics” (usually pejorative) is from 1749. Political prisoner first recorded 1860; political science is from 1779 (first attested in Hume). Political animal translates Greek politikon zoon (Aristotle, “Politics,” I.ii.9) “an animal intended to live in a city; a social animal.”

ZOO – word-forming element meaning “animal, living being,” from comb. form of Greek zoionan animal,” literally “a living being,” from PIE root *gwei-to live, life” (source also of Greek bioslife,” Old English cwiculiving;” see bio-).

–=–

The best of students are often called the “teacher’s pet”. Is this an endearment or merely the sign of an animal with an ultra-trainable mentality?

PET – “tamed animal,” originally in Scottish and northern England dialect (and exclusively so until mid-18c.), of unknown origin. Sense of  “indulged child” (c.1500) is recorded slightly earlier than that of “animal kept as a favorite” (1530s), but the latter may be the primary meaning. Probably associated with or influenced by petty . As a term of endearment by 1849. Teacher’s pet is attested from 1890.

–=–

But wait a minute! Education creates smart people does it not?

In actuality, the population is so dumbed down that it doesn’t even know the meaning of that word!

SMART – (n.) “sharp pain,” c.1200, from sharp (adj.). Cognate with Middle Dutch smerte, Dutch smart, Old High German smerzo, German Schmerzpain.”

SMART – (adj.) From late Old English smeartpainful, severe, stinging; causing a sharp pain,” related to smeortan (see smart (v.)). Meaning “executed with force and vigor” is from c.1300. Meaning “quick, active, clever” is attested from c.1300, from the notion of “cutting” wit, words, etc., or else “keen in bargaining.” Meaning “trim in attire” first attested 1718, “ascending from the kitchen to the drawing-room c.1880” [Weekley]. For sense evolution, compare sharp (adj.). In reference to devices, the sense of “behaving as though guided by intelligence” (as in smart bomb) first attested 1972. Smarts “good sense, intelligence,” is first recorded 1968. Smart cookie is from 1948.

SMARTEN – (v.) “to make smart, to spruce up, to improve appearance,” 1786, from smart (adj.) in its sense of “spruce, trim” + -en (1). Related: Smartened; smartening.

–=–

Education places more importance on dress attire and proper artful etiquette than knowledge. It’s sole purpose is to produce trained animals that have the appearance of professionalism, that in reality have no foundational legitimacy to profess anything at all.

The syndicate doesn’t just employ advocates, it absorbs them into its matrix. Admittance isn’t just acceptance, it is the creation of a new creature; the bestowing of flattering title and privilege through registration, education, and finally subscription into the establishment. One’s entire lifestyle must change to fit the world view of their chosen profession. The syndicate becomes the surrogate mother of all its conscripted advocates, whom in turn are vested in the syndicate for their very surrogate existence – totally dependent on its continuity in order to prove their own credentials. They are literally by necessity of their titles plugged-in to the matrix…

For the word matrix is not some science fiction creation. It is in reality the creation of fiction. A matrix is the birth origination of an artificial person into the syndicate.

MATRIX – From late 14c., “uterus, womb,” from Old French matrice “womb, uterus,” from Latin matrix (genitive matricis) “pregnant animal,” in Late Latin “womb,” also “source, origin,” from mater (genitive matris) “mother” (see mother (n.1)). Sense of “place or medium where something is developed” is first recorded 1550s; sense of “embedding or enclosing mass” first recorded 1640s. Logical sense of “array of possible combinations of truth-values” is attested from 1914. As a verb from 1951.

MATRIXIn civil law, the protocol or first draft of a legal instrument, from which all copies must be taken. (Downing v. Diaz, 80 Tex. 436, 16 S.W. 53.)

MATRIXWomb. A place where anything is generated or formed. (Samuel Johnson’s Dictionary 1755)

–=–

MATRICULATE – From the 1570s, “to admit a student to a college by enrolling his name on the register,” from Late Latin matriculatus, past participle of matriculareto register,” from Latin matriculapublic register,” diminutive of matrix (genitive matricis) “list, roll,” also “sources, womb” (see matrix).

ADMIT – (v.) From late 14c., “let in,” from Latin admittereto allow to enter, let in, let come, give access,” from ad- “to” (see ad-) + mittere “let go, send” (see mission). Sense of “to concede as valid or true” is first recorded early 15c. Related: Admitted; Admitting.

CONSCRIPTION – From late 14c., “a putting in writing,” from Middle French conscription, from Latin conscriptionem (nominative conscriptio) “a drawing up of a list, enrollment, a levying of soldiers,” from conscribereto enroll,” from com- “with” (see com-) + scribereto write” (see script (n.)). Meaning “enlistment of soldiers” is from 1520s; the sense “compulsory enlistment for military service” (1800) is traceable to the French Republic act of Sept. 5, 1798. Technically, a conscription is the enrollment of a fixed number by lot, with options of providing a substitute.

TAX – c.1300, “impose a tax on,” from Old French taxer “impose a tax” (13c.) and directly from Latin taxareevaluate, estimate, assess, handle,” also “censure, charge,” probably a frequentative form of tangereto touch” (see tangent (adj.)). Sense of “to burden, put a strain on” first recorded early 14c.; that of “censure, reprove” is from 1560s. Its use in Luke ii for Greek apographeinto enter on a list, enroll” is due to Tyndale. Related: Taxed; taxing.

ENROLLMENT – (n.) also enrolment, mid-15c., “act of enrolling,” from Anglo-French enrollement, from Middle French enrollement, from Old French enrollerrecord in a register” (see enroll). Meaning “total number enrolled” is from 1859, American English.

ENROLL – From mid-14c. (transitive), from Old French enrollerrecord in a register, write in a roll” (13c., Modern French enrôler), from en-make, put in” (see en- (1)) + rolle (see roll (n.)). Related: Enrolled; enrolling.

ROLL – From early 13c., “rolled-up piece of parchment or paper” (especially one inscribed with an official record), from Old French rolledocument, parchment scroll, decree” (12c.), from Medieval Latin rotulusa roll of paper” (source also of Spanish rollo, Italian ruollo), from Latin rotulasmall wheel,” diminutive of rota “wheel” (see rotary). Meaning “a register, list, catalogue” is from late 14c., common from c.1800…

REGISTER  (v1)- late 14c. (transitive), “enter in a listing,” from Old French registrernote down, include” (13c.) and directly from Medieval Latin registrare, from registrum (see register (n.)). Intransitive sense, of instruments, from 1797; of persons and feelings, “make an impression,” from 1901. Meaning “to enter one’s name in a list” for some purpose is from 1940. Related: Registered; registering. Registered nurse attested from 1879.

REGISTER – (n.1) late 14c., from Old French registre (13c.) and directly from Medieval Latin registrum, alteration of Late Latin regestalist, matters recorded,” noun use of Latin regesta, neuter plural of regestus, past participle of regerereto record; retort,” literally “to carry back, bring back” from re- “back” (see re-) + gererecarry, bear” (see gest). Also borrowed in Dutch, German, Swedish, Danish. Some senses influenced by association with Latin regereto rule.” Meaning in printing, “exact alignment of presswork” is from 1680s… Sense “device by which data is automatically recorded” is 1830, from the verb; hence Cash register (1875).

REGISTER – (n.2) “assistant court officer in administrative or routine function,” 1530s, now chiefly U.S., alteration of registrar (q.v) due to influence of register.

ACTUARY – (n.) 1550s, “registrar, clerk,” from Latin actuariuscopyist, account-keeper,” from actuspublic business” (see act (n.)). Modern insurance office meaning first recorded 1849.

CATALOGUE – (n) from the early 15c., from Old French cataloguelist, index” (14c.), and directly from Late Latin catalogus, from Greek katalogosa list, register, enrollment” (such as the katalogos neon, the “catalogue of ships” in the “Iliad”), from katadown; completely” (see cata-) + legeinto say, count” (see lecture (n.)).

SUBSCRIBE – (v.) From the early 15c., “to sign at the bottom of a document,” from Latin subscriberewrite, write underneath, sign one’s name; register,” also figuratively “assent, agree to, approve,” from subunderneath” (see sub-) + scriberewrite” (see script (n.)). The meaning “give one’s consent” (by subscribing one’s name) first recorded mid-15c.; that of “contribute money to” 1630s; and that of “become a regular buyer of a publication” 1711, all originally literal. Related: Subscribed; subscribing.

SIGNATURE – (n.) 1530s, a kind of document in Scottish law, from Middle French signature (16c.) or directly from Medieval Latin signaturasignature, a rescript,” in classical Latin “the matrix of a seal,” from signatus, past participle of signareto mark with a stamp, sign” (see sign (v.)).  Meaning “one’s own name written in one’s own hand” is from 1570s, replacing sign-manual (early 15c.) in this sense… Meaning “a distinguishing mark of any kind” is from 1620s.

ESTABLISHMENT – From the late 15c., “settled arrangement,” also “income, property,” from establish + -ment. Meaning “established church” is from 1731; Sense of “place of business” is from 1832. Meaning “social matrix of ruling people and institutions” is attested occasionally from 1923, consistently from 1955. The connection of senses in the Latin word seems to be via confusion of Greek metra “womb” (from metermother;” see mother (n.1)) and an identical but different Greek word metra meaning “register, lot” (see meter (n.2)). Evidently Latin matrix was used to translate both, though it originally shared meaning with only one. Related: Matriculated; matriculating.

–=–

Of course we must train our young to be patriotic, thus defending the slave-master’s territory as if it were our own, preserving continuity of the syndicate that makes us all its unwitting patients. And so the education system has institutionalized and instilled in its patients (students), as animals, a strict territorial protectionism. Each school day begins with the saying of an enchantment pledge to the sovereign god of government via its symbol of authority, the United States war flag. I pledge allegiance, to the flag…

TERRITORIAL (adj.) – From the 1620s, “of or pertaining to a territory,” from Late Latin territorialis, from territorium (see territory). In reference to British regiments, from 1881. In reference to an area defended by an animal, from 1920. Territorial waters is from 1841. Territorial army “British home defense” is from 1908. Territorial imperativeanimal need to claim and defend territory is from 1966.

–=–

Territory and jurisdiction go hand in hand. A flattering title in the matrix of the syndicate only exists in that fictional jurisdiction, not in reality. Therefore the territorial imperative must be instilled into each generation in order to legitimize the syndicate. The birth certificate is the matrix, the initial legal document, which creates the bond and surety of the surname to the given name. Only upon that legal surname can the syndicate bestow titles and credentials – upon the artificial person (name).

Perhaps we are all victims here? Perhaps we have all received the mental mark of the government beast without contemplation, enchanted by our very own pledge of allegiance to a complete fiction. Perhaps this represents our being branded like cattle, as chattel within invisible paper borders educated to love our servitude and to hate true freedom…

MARK (n.) – “Trace, impression,” Old English mearc (West Saxon), merc (Mercian) “boundary, sign, limit, mark,” from Proto-Germanic *marko (cognates: Old Norse merki “boundary, sign,” mörk “forest,” which often marked a frontier; Old Frisian merke, Gothic marka “boundary, frontier,” Dutch merk “mark, brand,” German Mark “boundary, boundary land”), from PIE *merg- “edge, boundary, border” (cognates: Latin margo “margin;” Avestan mareza- “border,” Old Irish mruig, Irish bruig “borderland,” Welsh brodistrict“).  The primary sense is probably “boundary,” which had evolved by Old English through “sign of a boundary,” through “sign in general,” then to “impression or trace forming a sign.” Meaning “any visible trace or impression” first recorded c.1200. Sense of “line drawn to indicate starting point of a race” (as in on your marks …) first attested 1887. The Middle English sense of “target” (c.1200) is the notion in marksman and slang sense “victim of a swindle” (1883). The notion of “sign, token” is behind the meaning “numerical award given by a teacher” (1829). Influenced by Scandinavian cognates.

VICTIM (n.) – Late 15c., “living creature killed and offered as a sacrifice to a deity or supernatural power,” from Latin victimaperson or animal killed as a sacrifice.” Perhaps distantly connected to Old English wigidol,” Gothic weihs “holy,” German weihenconsecrate” (compare Weihnachten “Christmas”) on notion of “a consecrated animal.” Sense of “person who is hurt, tortured, or killed by another” is recorded from 1650s; meaning “person oppressed by some power or situation” is from 1718. Weaker sense of “person taken advantage of” is recorded from 1781.

–=–

And just where is it that we are collectively taken advantage of, receiving the mark of work training to ensure our future labor capacity to be used in commercial activities as employees of the human trafficking (commerce) syndicate?

SCHOOL (n.) – “Place of instruction,” Old English scol, from Latin scholaintermission of work, leisure for learning; learned conversation, debate; lecture; meeting place for teachers and students, place of instruction; disciples of a teacher, body of followers, sect,” from Greek skhole “spare time, leisure, rest ease; idleness; that in which leisure is employed; learned discussion;” also “a place for lectures, school;” originally “a holding back, a keeping clear,” from skheinto get” (from PIE root *segh-to hold, hold in one’s power, to have;” see scheme (n.)) + -ole by analogy with bole “a throw,” stole “outfit,” etc. The original notion is “leisure,” which passed to “otiose discussion” (in Athens or Rome the favorite or proper use for free time), then “place for such discussion.” The Latin word was widely borrowed (Old French escole, French école, Spanish escuela, Italian scuola, Old High German scuola, German Schule, Swedish skola, Gaelic sgiol, Welsh ysgol, Russian shkola). Translated in Old English as larhus, literally “lore house,” but this seems to have been a glossary word only. Meaning “students attending a school” in English is attested from c.1300; sense of “school building” is first recorded 1590s. Sense of “people united by a general similarity of principles and methods” is from 1610s; hence school of thought (1864). School of hard knocks “rough experience in life” is recorded from 1912 (in George Ade); to tell tales out of schoolbetray damaging secrets” is from 1540s. School bus is from 1908. School days is from 1590s. School board from 1870.

SCHEME (n.) – From the 1550s, “figure of speech,” from Medieval Latin schemashape, figure, form, appearance; figure of speech; posture in dancing,” from Greek skhema (genitive skhematos) “figure, appearance, the nature of a thing,” related to skheinto get,” and ekheinto have,” from PIE root *segh-to hold, to hold in one’s power, to have” (cognates: Sanskrit sahatehe masters, overcomes,” sahahpower, victory;” Avestan hazah “power, victory;” Greek ekheinto have, hold;” Gothic sigis, Old High German sigu, Old Norse sigr, Old English sigevictory“). The sense “program of action” first is attested 1640s. Unfavorable overtones (selfish, devious) began to creep in early 18c. Meaning “complex unity of coordinated component elements” is from 1736. Color scheme is attested from 1884. – (v.) – to “devise a scheme,” 1767 (earlier “reduce to a scheme,” 1716), from scheme (n.). Related: Schemed; scheming.

–=–

To put this into terms of common understanding, schools now teach students how to learn to be a part of the end result of the scheme of education, how to be good little victims and patients, how to fit into the syndicate, and how to bear (carry) the mark and impression of unwarranted authority and oppression (a degree of crime) over apparently less “educated” persons. For an official education is not knowledge, merely learned behavior. By learning to believe in the territorial imperative – as trained animals – the pedagogical sophist (graduate with a degree) then intellectually feels the need to claim and defend the territorial scheme as a forceful government jurisdiction. For without a territory that recognizes the degree of crime (diploma) bestowed upon his or her name, the sophist would never succeed in his selfish claim of master and graduate, nor have title and status over others. The graduate is thus an automatic advocate of the syndicate. For without the authority of the University institution, his or her credentials (diploma) would be worthless.

–=–
Degrees Of Crime
–=–

The average ego-centric person is very proud of their little piece of parchment that states the degree to which they have been “educated”. The conceptual actualization of the credentialist model through education allows for a criminal syndicate based on mere export of specifically trained animals, where the worst crimes against humanity are imagined and perpetrated. This ranking system of schools and universities when brought into the light reveals origins much more imaginative than the best science fictions available. Basing its ladder of approval and license via the issuance of a state-sanctioned diploma, the true nature of this system boils down to mere monopolistic syndicalism.

To comprehend what the education system truly represents, we must first discover where these words originated and how they describe just what an “educated” man is. Receiving your high school, college, and university diploma has been engrained into our societal norm as one of the great achievements of a young person’s life. But what is the etymology of that word?

It is interesting to note that the etymology of the word degree, referring to the movement or position of some thing in relation to its master:

DEGREE (n.)  “a grade of crime“, early 13c., from Old French degré (12c.) “a step (of a stair), pace, degree (of relationship), academic degree; rank, status, position,” said to be from Vulgar Latin *degradusa step,” from Late Latin degredare, from Latin de- “down” – (see de-) + gradus “step” (see grade (n.)).

–=–

In reality, a earn a degree is to “degrade”, which is why you receive grades (a degree of measurement) on your efforts, becoming legally limited and bound by the syndicate. Acceptance of artifice and title is the acceptance of one’s place diminished within the syndicate as a lesser subject – a cog in the wheel. This is not an honor, for the giver of that honer is not lawful or honorable, and in fact is literally criminal (confederation) in nature. The syndicate can only lower one’s standing, never raise it. For standing is mere legalese, and title requires subjection to the rules and regulations of the syndicate through the use of the surname, which again is an artificial person and property of government. In exchange for the extinguishing or free thought by students and laborers, the syndicate dispenses degrees, which represents one’s relationship and status within the syndicate, and rewards the silent with money and benefits. For the diploma and degree are of the state, not the school. This, again, is voluntary slavery. And the benefits for volunteers are quite enticing…

You could say that an education degree is a way of measuring the criminal degree of a person, in the form of his or her status assigned by the criminal syndicate government.

The word “graduation” in essence refers to temperature, as in refining or tempering the mind like crude oil and like a trained dog:

GRADUATION – From early 15c., in alchemy, “tempering, refining of something to a certain degree; measurement according to the four degrees of a quality,” from graduate (n.). General sense of “dividing into degrees” is from 1590s; meaning “action of receiving or giving an academic degree” is from early 15c.; in reference to the ceremony where a degree is given, from 1818.

GRADUATE – From early 15c., “one who holds a degree” (with man; as a stand-alone noun from mid-15c.), from Medieval Latin graduatus, past participle of graduarito take a degree,” from Latin gradus “step, grade” (see grade (n.)). As an adjective, from late 15c.

UPGRADE (v.) – “increase to a higher grade or rank,” 1904 (transitive); 1950 (intransitive), from up (adv.) + grade (v.). Related: Upgraded; upgrading.

GRADE (v.) – 1650s, “to arrange in grades,” from grade (n.). Related: Graded; grading.

GRADE (n.) – From the 1510s, “degree of measurement,” from French grade “grade, degree” (16c.), from Latin gradus “step, pace, gait, walk;” figuratively “a step, stage, degree,” related to gradito walk, step, go,” from PIE *ghredh- (cognates: Lithuanian gridiju “to go, wander,” Old Church Slavonic gredoto come,” Old Irish in-greinnhe pursues,” and second element in congress, progress, etc.).  Replaced Middle English gree “step, degree in a series,” from Old French grei “step,” from Latin gradus. Railway sense is from 1811. Meaning “class of things having the same quality or value” is from 1807; meaning “division of a school curriculum equivalent to one year” is from 1835; that of “letter-mark indicating assessment of a student’s work” is from 1886 (earlier used of numerical grades). Grade A “top quality, fit for human consumption” (originally of milk) is from a U.S. system instituted in 1912.

–=–

And of course to temper something is to assign a temperature (degree) to it:

TEMPERATURE  (n.)    mid-15c., “fact of being tempered, proper proportion;” 1530s, “character or nature of a substance,” from Latin temperatura “a tempering, moderation,” from temperatus, past participle of temperare “to be moderate; to mingle in due proportion” (see temper (v.))

TEMPORATE  (adj.)   late 14c., of persons, “modest, forbearing, self-restrained, not swayed by passion;” of climates or seasons, “not liable to excessive heat or cold,” from Latin temperatus “restrained, regulated, limited, moderate, sober, calm, steady,” from past participle of temperare “to moderate, regulate” (see temper (v.)). Related: Temperately; temperateness. Temperate zone is attested from 1550s.

–=–

To be idealistically trained by the syndicate is to be of moderate degree:

MODERATE (n.)    “one who holds moderate opinions on controversial subjects,” 1794, from moderate (adj.). Related: Moderatism; -moderantism. (adj.) “within bounds, observing moderation;” figuratively “modest, restrained,” past participle of moderari “to regulate, mitigate, restrain, temper, set a measure, keep (something) within measure,” related to modus “measure,” from PIE *med-es-, from base *med- (see medical (adj.)). The notion is “keeping within due measure.” In English, of persons from early 15c.; of opinions from 1640s.

–=–

So what happens at the end of the tempering of animals and quelling of free thought?

The diploma is bestowed as a literal license to do what is otherwise illegal, and still often unlawful despite it.

Stemming from the word “diplomacy”, which is just another form of advocacy, we can further understand just what a diploma truly represents:

DIPLOMA (n.) – From the 1640s, “state paper, official document,” from Latin diploma, from Greek diploma “license, chart,” originally “paper folded double,” from diploun “to double, fold over,” from diploos “double” (see diploid) + -oma. Specific academic sense is 1680s in English.

DIPLOMACY (n.) – From 1796, from French diplomatie, formed from diplomatediplomat” (on model of aristocratie from aristocrate), from Latin adjective diplomaticos, from diploma (genitive diplomatis) “official document conferring a privilege (see diploma; for sense evolution, see diplomatic).

DIPLOMATIC (adj.) – From 1711, “pertaining to documents, texts, charters,” from Medieval Latin diplomaticus, from diplomat-, stem of diploma (see diploma). Meaning “pertaining to international relations” is recorded from 1787, apparently a sense evolved in 18c. from the use of diplomaticus in Modern Latin titles of collections of international treaties, etc., in which the word referred to the “texts” but came to be felt as meaning “pertaining to international relations.” In the general sense of “tactful and adroit,” it dates from 1826. Related: Diplomatically.

REPORT (n.) – From late 14c., “an account brought by one person to another, rumor,” from Old French reportpronouncement, judgment” (Modern French rapport), from reporterto tell, relate” (see report (v.)). Meaning “resounding noise, sound of an explosion” is from 1580s. Meaning “formal statement of results of an investigation” first attested 1660s; sense of “teacher’s official statement of a pupil’s work and behavior” is from 1873 (report card in the school sense first attested 1919).

–=–

A diploma is then really nothing more and nothing less than the conferment of State privilege and license, so that one may be judged officially as tame and trainable enough to join the syndicate monopoly within its institutions. The candidate must be employable (able to be used as a commodity) within the various government regulated industries, and must be entrusted with its  secrets, not the least of which is its own fraudulent nature.

I wonder where the word “university” came from?

UNIVERS’ITYnoun An assemblage of colleges established in any place, with professors for instructing students in the sciences and other branches of learning, and where degrees are conferred. A university is properly a universal school, in which are taught all branches of learning, or the four faculties of theology, medicine, law and the sciences and arts. (–Webster’s 1828)

UNIVERSITAS – Latin. In the civil law. A corporation aggregate. Literally, a whole formed out of many individuals. (–Black’s 1st)

UNIVERSUS – Latin. The whole; all together. (–Black’s 1st)

UNIVERSAL AGENT – One who if appointed to do all the acts which the principal can personally do, and which he may lawfully delegate the power to another to do. (–Black’s 1st)

UNI – word-forming element meaning “having one only,” from Latin uni-, comb. form of unus (see one).

–=–

E Pluribus Unum…

The only competition between Universities is with their sports teams. The teaching of misinformation and doctrine is universal throughout. For teachers and professors are advocates too, whose credentials demand conformity to syllabus and syndicalism.

A diploma really represents a permission bestowed by the syndicate through universal (university) control of information that one may be of a certain vocation. This is no different than a priest telling you that you have a calling. It is the very definition of syndicalist education: work training.

VOCATION (n.) – early 15c., “spiritual calling,” from Old French vocacioncall, consecration; calling, profession” (13c.) or directly from Latin vocationem (nominative vocatio), literally “a calling, a being called” from vocatus “called,” past participle of vocare to call” (see voice (n.)). Sense of “one’s occupation or profession” is first attested 1550s.

CALLING (n.) – “vocation,” mid-13c., verbal noun from call (v.). The sense traces to I Cor. vii:20.

CALL (v.) – Sanskrit garhati meaning to “bewail, criticize;” and from Old High German klaga, German Klage “complaint, grievance, lament, accusation;” etc… From 13th Century call meaning “to give a name to.”

CALLER (n.) – Circa 1500, “one who proclaims,” agent noun from call (v.)

VOUCH (v.) – From early 14c., “summon into court to prove a title,” from Anglo-French voucher, Old French vocher to call, summon, invoke, claim,” probably from Gallo-Roman *voticare, metathesis of Latin vocitare to call to, summon insistently,” frequentative of Latin vocare “to call, call upon, summon” (see voice (n.)). Meaning “guarantee to be true or accurate” is first attested 1590s. Related: Vouched; vouching.

GUARANTEE (n.) – From the 1670s, altered (perhaps via Spanish garante), from earlier garrant warrant that the title to a property is true,” early 15c., from Old French garantdefender, protector,” from Germanic (see warrant (n.)). For form evolution, see gu-. Originally “person giving something as security;” sense of the “pledge” itself (which is properly a guaranty) developed 17c.

WARRANT (v.) – From late 13th Century “to keep safe from danger,” from Old North French warantir safeguard, protect; guarantee, pledge” (Old French garantir), from warant (see warrant (n.)). Meaning “to guarantee to be of quality” is attested from late 14c.; sense of “to guarantee as true” is recorded from c.1300. Related: Warranted; warranting; warrantable.

SURETY (n.) – c.1300, “a guarantee, promise, pledge, an assurance,” from Old French seurté “a promise, pledge, guarantee; assurance, confidence” (12c., Modern French sûreté), from Latin securitatem (nominative securitas) “freedom from care or danger, safety, security,” from securus (see secure (adj.)). From late 14c. as “security, safety, stability; state of peace,” also “certainty, certitude; confidence.” Meaning “one who makes himself responsible for another” is from early 15c. Until 1966, the French national criminal police department was the Sûreté nationale.

BORROW (v.) – From Old English borgianto lend, be surety for,” from Proto-Germanic *borgpledge” (cognates: Old English borgpledge, security, bail, debt,” Old Norse borgato become bail for, guarantee,” Middle Dutch borghento protect, guarantee,” Old High German boragen “to beware of,” German borgen “to borrow; to lend”), from PIE root *bhergh- (1) “to hide, protect” (see bury). Sense shifted in Old English to “borrow,” apparently on the notion of collateral deposited as security for something borrowed. Related: Borrowed; borrowing.

PLEDGE (n.) – From mid-14c., “surety, bail,” from Old French plege (Modern French pleige) “hostage, security, bail,” probably from Frankish *pleganto guarantee,” from *pleg-, a West Germanic root meaning “have responsibility for” (cognates: Old Saxon pleganvouch for,” Middle Dutch pliento answer for, guarantee,” Old High German pflegan “to care for, be accustomed to,” Old English pleon “to risk the loss of, expose to danger;” see plight (v.)). Meaning “allegiance vow attested by drinking with another” is from 1630s. Sense of “solemn promise” first recorded 1814, though this notion is from 16c. in the verb. Weekley notes the “curious contradiction” in pledge (v.) “to toast with a drink” (1540s) and pledge (n.) “the vow to abstain from drinking” (1833). Meaning “student who has agreed to join a fraternity or sorority” dates from 1901.

–=–

Advocates are heavily protected by the syndicate so that they may act in its interest, under its name, no matter how unlawful (yet legalized by the syndicate against the law) those actions may be. Doctors, for instance, must take extreme amounts of liability and malpractice insurance in order to protect their “practice.” The normalcy of this fact is quite frightening, as the common folk never seem to grasp that a Doctor’s whole “practice” is fraud in the first place. Every action, in other words, by a doctor is indeed malpractice and done so under a pseudonym protected by the syndicate.

This shirking of personal responsibility is key to the atrocities taking place within these institutions. Representing massive combinations of syndicalists, monopolies and trusts rule the day.

Do you have the right to work in the syndicate? Only if you can show permission from the animal training university center you attended and if your name is marked with a degree of crime. You must be confirmed into the syndicate due to your corroboration and willingness to commit legalized crime (crime by permission of the state). For you are thus forbidden to enter a specialty field while having your own opinions…

CREDENTIAL (n.) “that which entitles to credit,” 1756, probably a back-formation from credentials. Earlier in English as an adjective, “confirming, corroborating” (late 15c.). As a verb, “provide with credentials,” by 1828 (implied in dredentialed).

CREDENTIALS (n.) “letters entitling the bearer to certain credit or confidence,” 1670s, from Medieval Latin credentialis, from credentia (see credence). Probably immediately as a shortening of letters credential (1520s, with French word order); earlier was letter of credence (mid-14c.).

CREDIT (n.) – From the 1520s, from Middle French crédit (15c.) “belief, trust,” from Italian credito, from Latin credituma loan, thing entrusted to another,” from past participle of credereto trust, entrust, believe” (see credo). The commercial sense was the original one in English (creditor is mid-15c.). Meaning “honor, acknowledgment of merit,” is from c.1600. Academic sense of “point for completing a course of study” is 1904. Movie/broadcasting sense is 1914. Credit rating is from 1958; credit union is 1881, American English.

ACCREDIT (v.) – From the 1610s, from French accréditer, from à “to” (see ad-) + créditerto credit” (someone with a sum), from créditcredit” (see credit (n.)). Related: Accredited; accrediting.

CONFIDENCE – (n.) From early 15c., from Middle French confidence or directly from Latin confidentia, from confidentem (nominative confidens) “firmly trusting, bold,” present participle of confidereto have full trust or reliance,” from com, intensive prefix (see com-), + fidereto trust” (see faith). For sense of “swindle” see con (adj.).

CON – (adj.) “swindling,” 1889, American English, from confidence man (1849), from the many scams in which the victim is induced to hand over money as a token of confidence. Confidence with a sense of “assurance based on insufficient grounds” dates from 1590s.

CON – (n.) “study,” early 15c., from Old English cunnanto know, know how” (see can (v.1)).

CON- – word-forming element meaning “together, with,”

DREAD (v.) – late 12c., a shortening of Old English adrædan, contraction of ondrædancounsel or advise against,” also “to dread, fear, be afraid,” from on-against” + rædanto advise” (see read (v.)). Cognate of Old Saxon andradon, Old High German intraten. Related: Dreaded; dreading. As a noun from 12c.

MASTER’S DEGREE (n.) From late 14c., originally a degree giving one authority to teach in a university; from master (n.) in its general sense of “man of learning” (early 13c.), “a teacher” (c.1200).

MASTER (n.) – From late Old English mægesterone having control or authority,” from Latin magister (n.) “chief, head, director, teacher” (source of Old French maistre, French maître, Spanish and Italian maestro, Portuguese mestre, Dutch meester, German Meister), contrastive adjective (“he who is greater“) from magis (adv.) “more,” from PIE *mag-yos-, comparative of root *meg-great” (see mickle). Form influenced in Middle English by Old French cognate maistre. Meaning “original of a recording” is from 1904. In academic senses (from Medieval Latin magister) it is attested from late 14c., originally a degree conveying authority to teach in the universities. As an adjective from late 12c.

DOCTRINE (n.) – From late 14c., from Old French doctrine (12c.) “teaching, doctrine,” and directly from Latin doctrinateaching, body of teachings, learning,” from doctorteacher” (see doctor (n.)).

DOCTOR (n.) – c.1300, “Church father,” from Old French doctour, from Medieval Latin doctorreligious teacher, adviser, scholar,” in classical Latin “teacher,” agent noun from docereto show, teach, cause to know,” originally “make to appear right,” causative of decerebe seemly, fitting” (see decent).  Meaning “holder of highest degree in university” is first found late 14c.; as is that of “medical professional” (replacing native leech (n.2)), though this was not common till late 16c. The transitional stage is exemplified in Chaucer’s Doctor of phesike (Latin physica came to be used extensively in Medieval Latin for medicina). Similar usage of the equivalent of doctor is colloquial in most European languages: Italian dottore, French docteur, German doktor, Lithuanian daktaras, though these are typically not the main word in those languages for a medical healer. For similar evolution, see Sanskrit vaidya- “medical doctor,” literally “one versed in science.” German Arzt, Dutch arts are from Late Latin archiater, from Greek arkhiatroschief healer,” hence “court physician.” French médecin is a back-formation from médicine, replacing Old French miege, from Latin medicus.

LEECH (n.1) – “bloodsucking aquatic worm,” from Old English læce (Kentish lyce), of unknown origin (with a cognate in Middle Dutch lake). Commonly regarded as a transferred use of leech (n.2), but the Old English forms suggest a distinct word, which has been assimilated to leech (n.2) by folk etymology [see OED]. Figuratively applied to human parasites since 1784.

LEECH (n.2) – obsolete forphysician,” from Old English læce, probably from Old Danish læke, from Proto-Germanic *lekjazenchanter, one who speaks magic words; healer, physician” (cognates: Old Frisian letza, Old Saxon laki, Old Norse læknir, Old High German lahhi, Gothic lekeis “physician”), literally “one who counsels,” perhaps connected with a root found in Celtic (compare Irish liaigcharmer, exorcist, physician“) and Slavic (compare Serbo-Croatian lijekar, Polish lekarz), from PIE *lep-agiconjurer,” from root *leg-to collect,” with derivatives meaning “to speak” (see lecture (n.)). For sense development, compare Old Church Slavonic balijidoctor,” originally “conjurer,” related to Serbo-Croatian bajatienchant, conjure;” Old Church Slavonic vrači, Russian vračdoctor,” related to Serbo-Croatian vračsorcerer, fortune-teller.” The form merged with leech (n.1) in Middle English, apparently by folk etymology. In 17c., leech usually was applied only to veterinary practitioners. The fourth finger of the hand, in Old English, was læcfinger, translating Latin digitus medicus, Greek daktylus iatrikos, supposedly because a vein from that finger stretches straight to the heart.

LEECHCRAFT (n.) – “art of healing,” Old English læcecræft; see leech (2) + craft (n.).

BACCALAUREATE (n.) – 1620s, “university degree of a bachelor,” from Modern Latin baccalaureatus, from baccalaureusstudent with the first degree,” alteration of Medieval Latin baccalariusone who has attained the lowest degree in a university, advanced student lecturing under his master’s supervision but not yet having personal license” (altered by folk etymology or word-play, as if from bacca lauri “laurel berry,” laurels being awarded for academic success).

SOPHOMORE (n.) – 1680s, “student in the second year of university study,” literally “arguer,” altered from sophumer (1650s, from sophume, archaic variant form of sophism), probably by influence of folk etymology derivation from Greek sophos “wise” + morosfoolish, dull(a wise fool). The original reference might be to the dialectic exercises that formed a large part of education in the middle years. At Oxford and Cambridge, a sophister (from sophist with spurious -er as in philosopher) was a second- or third-year student (what Americans would call a “junior” might be a senior sophister).

SOPHISM (n.) – From early 15c., earlier sophime (mid-14c.), “specious but fallacious argument devised for purposes of deceit or to exercise one’s ingenuity,” from Old French sophimea fallacy, false argument” (Modern French sophisme), from Latin sophisma, from Greek sophismaclever device, skillful act, stage-trick,” from stem of sophizesthaibecome wise” (see sophist).

SOPHISTRY (n.) “specious but fallacious reasoning,” mid-14c., from Old French sophistrie (Modern French sophisterie), from Medieval Latin sophistria, from Latin sophista, sophistes (see sophist). “Sophistry applies to reasoning as sophism to a single argument” [Century Dictionary].

PUPIL (n.1) – “student,” late 14c., originally “orphan child, ward,” from Old French pupille (14c.) and directly from Latin pupillus (fem. pupilla) “orphan child, ward, minor,” diminutive of pupus “boy” (fem. pupa “girl”), probably related to puerchild,” possibly from PIE *pup-, from root *pu-to swell, inflate.” Meaning “disciple, student” first recorded 1560s. Related: Pupillary.

MONITOR (n.) – 1540s, “senior pupil at a school charged with keeping order, etc.,” from Latin monitorone who reminds, admonishes, or checks,” also “an overseer, instructor, guide, teacher,” agent noun from monereto admonish, warn, advise,” related to memini “I remember, I am mindful of,” and to mens “mind,” from PIE root *men-to think” (see mind (n.)).  The type of lizard so called because it is supposed to give warning of crocodiles (1826). Meaning “squat, slow-moving type of ironclad warship” (1862) so called from name of the first vessel of this design, chosen by the inventor, Swedish-born U.S. engineer John Ericsson (1803-1889), because it was meant to “admonish” the Confederate leaders in the U.S. Civil War. Broadcasting sense of “a device to continuously check on the technical quality of a transmission” (1931) led to special sense of “a TV screen displaying the picture from a particular camera.”

TEACHER (n.) – “one who teaches,” c.1300; agent noun from teach (v.). It was used earlier in a sense of “index finger” (late 13c.). Teacher’s pet attested from 1856.

INSTRUCTOR (n.) – mid-15c., from Old French instructeur and directly from Medieval Latin instructorteacher” (in classical Latin, “preparer“), agent noun from instruere (see instruct).

INSTRUCT (v.) – early 15c., from Latin instructus, past participle of instruerearrange, inform, teach,” literally “to build, erect,” from in- “on” (see in- (2)) + struereto pile, build” (see structure (n.)). Related: Instructed; instructing.

INFORM (v.) –  early 14c., “to train or instruct in some specific subject,” from Old French informerinstruct, inform, teach,” and directly from Latin informareto shape, form,” figuratively “train, instruct, educate,” from in- “into” (see in- (2)) + formare “to form, shape,” from forma “form” (see form (n.)). Varied with enform until c.1600. Sense of “report facts or news” first recorded late 14c. Related: Informed; informing.

PEDAGOGUE (n.) – From late 14c., “schoolmaster, teacher,” from Old French pedagogeteacher of children” (14c.), from Latin paedagogus, from Greek paidagogosslave who escorts boys to school and generally supervises them,” later “a teacher,” from pais (genitive paidos) “child” (see pedo-) + agogosleader,” from ageinto lead” (see act (n.)). Hostile implications in the word are at least from the time of Pepys (1650s). Related: Pedagogal.

PEDAGOGIC (adj.) – From 1781, from Latin paedagogicus, from Greek paidagogikossuitable for a teacher,” from paidagogosteacher” (see pedagogue).

MISTRESS (n.) – early 14c., “female teacher, governess,” from Old French maistressemistress (lover); housekeeper; governess, female teacher” (Modern French maîtresse), fem. of maistremaster” (see master (n.)). Sense of “a woman who employs others or has authority over servants” is from early 15c. Sense of “kept woman of a married man” is from early 15c.

PRECEPTOR (n.) – From early 15c., “tutor, instructor” (earliest reference might be to “expert in the art of writing“), from Latin praeceptorteacher, instructor,” agent noun from praecipere (see precept). Medical training sense attested from 1803.

PRECEPT – From late 14c., from Old French percept, percet (12c.), from Latin praeceptummaxim, rule of conduct, order,” noun use of neuter past participle of praeciperegive rules to, order, advise,” literally “take beforehand,” from praebefore” (see pre-) + capere (past participle captus) “to take” (see capable). For change of vowel, see biennial.

PROFESSOR (n.) – From late 14c., “one who teaches a branch of knowledge,” from Old French professeur (14c.) and directly from Latin professorperson who professes to be an expert in some art or science; teacher of highest rank,” agent noun from profiterilay claim to, declare openly” (see profess). As a title prefixed to a name, it dates from 1706. Short form prof is recorded from 1838. Professor: One professing religion. This canting use of the word comes down from the Elizabethan period, but is obsolete in England. [Thornton, “American Glossary,” 1912]

PEDAGOGY (n.) – 1580s, from Middle French pédagogie (16c.), from Latin paedagogia, from Greek paidagogiaeducation, attendance on boys,” from paidagogosteacher” (see pedagogue).

INSTRUCTOR (n.) – mid-15c., from Old French instructeur and directly from Medieval Latin instructorteacher” (in classical Latin, “preparer“), agent noun from instruere (see instruct).

GOVERNESS (n.) – mid-15c., “female ruler,” shortening of governouressea woman who rules” (late 14c.), from Old French governeressefemale ruler or administrator” (see governor + -ess); in the sense of “a female teacher in a private home” it is attested from 1712.

MAGISTERIAL (adj.) – 1630s, from Medieval Latin magisterialisof or pertaining to the office of magistrate, director, or teacher,” from Late Latin magisteriushaving authority of a magistrate,” from magisterchief, director” (see master (n.)). Related: Magisterially.

–=–
The Magic Spell
–=–

Stories of witchcraft and magic (magi-c) may be grandiose and over the top in the fiction and fantasy of syndicated media, but their practical application towards the education system can be readily defined within the etymology of words. Witches and warlocks cast spells. They do so with incantations of words and through the use of mythical symbols. For the spell to work the student must be taught spelling, and be graded in such art. But the education system never reveals to its students and descended “masters” of learning degrees just what spelling truly represents, for the student becomes the object of the spelled out words of approved textbooks, thus leaving an “educated” person under the spell of the syndicate. So let’s examine the origin of the spell, both in the spoken and in the written word:

SPELL (v.) – early 14c., “read letter by letter, write or say the letters of;” c.1400, “form words by means of letters,” apparently a French word that merged with or displaced a native Old English one; both are from the same Germanic root, but the French word had evolved a different sense. The native word is Old English spellianto tell, speak, discourse, talk,” from Proto-Germanic *spellam (cognates: Old High German spellonto tell,” Old Norse spjalla, Gothic spillonto talk, tell“), from PIE *spel- (2) “to say aloud, recite.” But the current senses seem to come from Anglo-French espeller, Old French espelirmean, signify, explain, interpret,” also “spell out letters, pronounce, recite,” from Frankish *spellonto tell” or some other Germanic source, ultimately identical with the native word.  Related: Spelled; spelling. In early Middle English still “to speak, preach, talk, tell,” hence such expressions as hear spellhear (something) told or talked about,” spell the windtalk in vain” (both 15c.). Meaning “form words with proper letters” is from 1580s. Spell outexplain step-by-step is first recorded 1940, American English. Shakespeare has spell (someone) backwardsreverse the character of, explain in a contrary sense, portray with determined negativity.”

–=–

“No one will enter the New World Order
unless he or she will make a pledge to worship Lucifer.
No one will enter the New Age
unless he will take a LUCIFERIAN Initiation.” 

–David Spangler, Director of Planetary Initiative, United Nations

–=–

Thus the legal language as a “term of art” could certainly be said to be a magic spell, a spell foisted upon the common people by using the common (vulgar) vernacular spelling of word,s which in fact are defined quite opposite of the character of that common language. Other spells as art-form languages include the medical and biological spelling as well as that of other educated magi-cians, each with their own terms of art. In other words, each institution of the syndicate has its own language (terms of art), and so each animal that ascends through the education system is destined to be caught up in the paradigm of his chosen profession, never to understand the many other professions offered, each with their own use of “spelling”. In this way, the trained (educated) animals are kept institutionalized within their own chosen professions. They profess the language of their own dialectic, separated devisively by all others through the use of language as terms of art.

And through this word magic that is cast as a spell upon the education of students, the belief in the spell creates credentialed men of degree and diploma, who will each defend their education and the titled status it creates and vests upon their person literally to the death and detriment of their fellow species. For they are spellbound by the spells of spelling and the prestige they believe (be-LIE-ve) it creates…

SPELLBOUND (adj.) – “to be bound by or as if by a spell,” 1742, from spell (n.1) + bound (adj.1) “fastened,” past participle of bind (v.).

SPELLING (n.) – From mid-15c., “action of reading letter by letter,” verbal noun from spell (v.1). Meaning “manner of forming words with letters” is from 1660s; meaning “a way a word has been spelled” is from 1731. Spelling bee is from 1878 (see bee; earlier spelling match, 1845; the act of winning such a schoolroom contest is described 1854 as to spell (someone) down).

SPELLER (n.) – c.1200, “a preacher;” mid-15c. apparently in the sense “a person who reads letter by letter;” 1864 of a book to teach orthography. Agent noun from spell (v.1).

SPELL (n.) – Old English spellstory, saying, tale, history, narrative, fable; discourse, command,” from Proto-Germanic *spellam (see spell (v.1)). Compare Old Saxon spel, Old Norse spjall, Old High German spel, Gothic spillreport, discourse, tale, fable, myth;” German Beispielexample.” From c.1200 as “an utterance, something said, a statement, remark;” meaning “set of words with supposed magical or occult powers, incantation, charm” first recorded 1570s; hence any means or cause of enchantment. The term ‘spell’ is generally used for magical procedures which cause harm, or force people to do something against their will — unlike charms for healing, protection, etc. [“Oxford Dictionary of English Folklore”] – Also in Old English, “doctrine; a sermon; religious instruction or teaching; the gospel; a book of the Bible;” compare gospel. – (n.2) – 1620s, “a turn of work in place of another,” from spell (v.2); compare Old English gespeliaa substitute.” Meaning shifted toward “continuous course of work” (1706), probably via notion of shift work (as at sea) where one man or crew regularly “spelled” another. Hence “continuous stretch” of something (weather, etc.), recorded by 1728. Hence also, via the notion in give a spell (1750) “relieve another by taking a turn of work” came the sense “interval of rest or relaxation” (1845), which took the word to a sense opposite what it had at the start.

SPELLBIND (v.) – “to bind by or as if by spell,” 1808, probably a back-formation from spellbound. Related: Spellbinding; spellbinder.

SPELL (v.2) – “work in place of (another),” 1590s, earlier spele, from Old English spelianto take the place of, be substitute for, represent,” related to gespeliasubstitute,” of uncertain origin. Perhaps related to spilianto play” (see spiel). Related: Spelled; spelling.

PINYIN (n.) – system of Romanized spelling for Chinese, 1963, from Chinese pinyinto spell, to combine sounds into syllables,” from pinput together” + yinsound, tone.” Adopted officially by the People’s Republic of China in 1958. Outside China gradually superseding the 19c. Wade-Giles system (Mao Tse-tung is Wade-Giles, Mao Zedong is pinyin).

SENTENCE (n.) – c.1200, “doctrine, authoritative teaching; an authoritative pronouncement,” from Old French sentencejudgment, decision; meaning; aphorism, maxim; statement of authority” (12c.) and directly from Latin sententiathought, way of thinking, opinion; judgment, decision,” also “a thought expressed; aphorism, saying,” from sentientem, present participle of sentirebe of opinion, feel, perceive” (see sense (n.)). Loss of first -i- in Latin by dissimilation. From early 14c. as “judgment rendered by God, or by one in authority; a verdict, decision in court;” from late 14c. as “understanding, wisdom; edifying subject matter.” From late 14c. as “subject matter or content of a letter, book, speech, etc.,” also in reference to a passage in a written work. Sense of “grammatically complete statement” is attested from mid-15c. “Meaning,” then “meaning expressed in words.” Related: Sentential.

–=–

“All the world’s indeed a stage
And we are merely players,
Conformers and portrayer’s;
Each another’s audience
Outside the guided cage.”

–Rush, lyrics to  “Limelight”

–=–

Acceptance of accreditation (a-credit/title-bestowed by the State) by the Magistrates (gods) of government through its education syndicate is indeed the representation of man as player upon the stage. And when the spell is cast and recognition realized, the morals and ethics of natural man fall to the side of what the syndicate gives license for as the re-presentation of man as a doctor, lawyer, professional, and so-called “master”. Presto! With an imaginary corporate costume change the man becomes an agent of government controlled by the syndicate through the “degree of crime” diploma bestowed. His or her actions become those of an enchanted puppet, doing the bidding of those who pull his or her fictional strings and pay pensions, while the illusion of living in the limelight corrupts and defects. And through this re-presentation of man as a spellbound victim of the degree scheme, the most unconscionable accomplishments against man and nature can be accomplished under the doctrine of the syndicate’s occult and magical spell.

ENCHANTMENT (n.) – c.1300, “act of magic or witchcraft; use of magic; magic power,” from Old French encantementmagical spell; song, concert, chorus,” from enchanterbewitch, charm,” from Latin incantareenchant, cast a (magic) spell upon,” from in- “upon, into” (see in- (2)) + cantareto sing” (see chant (v.)). Figurative sense of “allurement” is from 1670s. Compare Old English galdorsong,” also “spell, enchantment,” from galanto sing,” which also is the source of the second element in nightingale.

FASCINATE (v.) – 1590s, “bewitch, enchant,” from Middle French fasciner (14c.), from Latin fascinatus, past participle of fascinarebewitch, enchant, fascinate,” from fascinusspell, witchcraft,” of uncertain origin. Possibly from Greek baskanosbewitcher, sorcerer,” with form influenced by Latin farispeak” (see fame (n.)). To fascinate is to bring under a spell, as by the power of the eye; to enchant and to charm are to bring under a spell by some more subtle and mysterious power. [Century Dictionary]. The Greek word might be from a Thracian equivalent of Greek phaskeinto say;” compare also enchant, and German besprechento charm,” from sprechento speak.” Earliest used of witches and of serpents, who were said to be able to cast a spell by a look that rendered one unable to move or resist. Sense of “delight, attract” is first recorded 1815. Related: Fascinated; fascinating.

INCANTATION (n.) – late 14c., from Old French incantacionspell, exorcism” (13c.), from Latin incantationem (nominative incantatio) “art of enchanting,” noun of action from past participle stem of incantarebewitch, charm,” literally “sing spells” (see enchantment).

MANTRA (n.) – 1808, “that part of the Vedas which contains hymns,” from Sanskrit mantrassacred message or text, charm, spell, counsel,” literally “instrument of thought,” related to manyatethinks,” from PIE root *men-to think” (see mind (n.)). Sense of “special word used for meditation” is first recorded in English 1956.

CONJURATION (n.) – late 14c., coniuracioun, “conspiracy” (now obsolete), also “a calling upon something supernatural,” from Old French conjuracionspell, incantation, formula used in exorcism,” from Latin coniurationem (nominative coniuratio) “a swearing (oath) together, conspiracy,” noun of action from coniurare (see conjure).

CONJURE (v.) – late 13c., “command on oath,” from Old French conjurer “invoke, conjure” (12c.), from Latin coniurareto swear together; conspire,” from com-together” (see com-) + iurareto swear” (see jury (n.)). Magical sense is c.1300, for “constraining by spella demon to do one’s bidding. Related: Conjured; conjuring. Phrase conjure upcause to appear in the mind” (as if by magic) attested from 1580s.

CHARM (v.) – c.1300, “to recite or cast a magic spell,” from Old French charmer (13c.) “to enchant, to fill (someone) with desire (for something); to protect, cure, treat; to maltreat, harm,” from Late Latin carminare, from Latin carmen (see charm (n.)). In Old French used alike of magical and non-magical activity. In English, “to win over by treating pleasingly, delight” from mid-15c. Related: Charmed; charming. Charmed (short for I am charmed) as a conventional reply to a greeting or meeting is attested by 1825.

–=–

“I pledge allegiance, to the flag, of the United States of America…” is one quite familiar enchantment perpetrated upon youngsters in all grades of education, creating the religiously patriotic doctrine of unthinking yet unwavering support of said state and nation – a necessity for the syndication of education and its design of pedagogy. This pledge (oath) is even invoked as a spell in the name of God, which fascinates even the most staunch of self-proclaimed atheists. The language of education is the lore of the syndicate, harvesting and training young minds into a delightfully rendered incapacity to think and feel anything that would disrupt the spelled-out doctrine of the syndicate.

LORE (n.) – Old English larlearning, what is taught, knowledge, science, doctrine, art of teaching,” from Proto-Germanic *laizo (Old Saxon lera, Old Frisian lare, Middle Dutch lere, Dutch leer, Old High German lera, German Lehreteaching, precept, doctrine“), from PIE *leis- (1) “track, furrow” (see learn).

FOLKLORE (n.) – From 1846, coined by antiquarian William J. Thoms (1803-1885) as an Anglo-Saxonism (replacing popular antiquities) and first published in the “Athenaeum” of Aug. 22, 1846, from folk + lore. Old English folclar meant “homily.”  This word revived folk in a modern sense of “of the common people, whose culture is handed down orally,” and opened up a flood of compound formations, as in folk art (1892), folk-hero (1874), folk-medicine (1877), folk-tale/folk tale (1850; Old English folctalu meant “genealogy“), folk-song (1847), folk singer (1876), folk-dance (1877).

MYTHOLOGICAL (adj.) – From the 1610s, from Late Latin mythologicus, from Greek mythologikosversed in legendary lore,” from mythologia (see mythology). Related: Mythologically.

MYTH (n.) – In 1830, from French Mythe (1818) and directly from Modern Latin mythus, from Greek mythosspeech, thought, story, myth, anything delivered by word of mouth,” of unknown origin. Myths are “stories about divine beings, generally arranged in a coherent system; they are revered as true and sacred; they are endorsed by rulers and priests; and closely linked to religion. Once this link is broken, and the actors in the story are not regarded as gods but as human heroes, giants or fairies, it is no longer a myth but a folktale. Where the central actor is divine but the story is trivial … the result is religious legend, not myth.” [J. Simpson & S. Roud, “Dictionary of English Folklore,” Oxford, 2000, p.254]. General sense of “untrue story, rumor” is from 1840.

MYTHIC (adj.) – From the 1660s, from Late Latin mythicuslegendary,” from Greek mythikos, from mythos (see myth).

MYTHOPOEIC (adj.) – “pertaining to the creation of myths,” 1846, from Greek mytho-, comb. form of mythos (see myth) + poieinto make, create” (see poet).

MYTHOLOGY (n.) – In early 15c., “exposition of myths,” from Middle French mythologie and directly from Late Latin mythologia, from Greek mythologialegendary lore, a telling of mythic legends; a legend, story, tale,” from mythosmyth” (of unknown origin) + -logy “study.” Meaning “a body of myths” first recorded 1781.

–=–

One might call the “student body” a “body of myths”, as they are literally engaged in the study (-logy) of modern myths (mythos).

Each individually titled character in American history, from presidents portrayed as fabled legends instead of frail old men, to philanthropists who steal from the poor only to partially give back to the poor in order to maintain the” welfare system”, are granted this modern mythological stature in the government’s educational lore called “textbooks”. For only from within the syndicate of the controllers of education is the lore chosen to be prescribed upon its studious victims. Thus, the purely patriotic (religious) myth of the “founding fathers” were born; known not as the masonic secret society it was but as the romanticized good guys that created this nation through a compact of indebtedness (constitution).

This doctrine is necessary to keep generation after generation as worshipers of their fathers; a fallacious title placed on a dark history in order to hide the true nature of the centralized syndicate that was berthed by those masonic founders. This historical lie is ingrained into the population thanks to government-required education. It is the institution of learned ignorance.

LEARN (v.) – Old English leornianto get knowledge, be cultivated, study, read, think about,” from Proto-Germanic *liznojan (cognates: Old Frisian lernia, Middle Dutch leeren, Dutch leren, Old High German lernen, German lernento learn,” Gothic laisI know“), with a base sense of “to follow or find the track,” from PIE *leis- (1) “track, furrow.” Related to German Gleis “track,” and to Old English læst “sole of the foot” (see last (n.)). The transitive sense (He learned me how to read), now vulgar, was acceptable from c.1200 until early 19c., from Old English læranto teach” (cognates: Dutch leren, German lehrento teach,” literally “to make known;” see lore), and is preserved in past participle adjective learned “having knowledge gained by study.” Related: Learning.

TEACH (v.) – Old English tæcan (past tense tæhte, past participle tæht) “to show, point out, declare, demonstrate,” also “to give instruction, train, assign, direct; warn; persuade,” from Proto-Germanic *taikijanto show” (cognates: Old High German zihan, German zeihento accuse,” Gothic ga-teihanto announce“), from PIE *deik- “to show, point out” (see diction). Related to Old English tacen, tacnsign, mark” (see token). Related: Taught; teaching. The usual sense of Old English tæcan was “show, declare, warn, persuade” (compare German zeigento show,” from the same root); while the Old English word for “to teach, instruct, guide” was more commonly læran, source of modern learn and lore.

BAD-MOUTH (v.) – “abuse someone verbally,” 1941, probably ultimately from noun phrase bad mouth (1835), in Black English, “a curse, spell,” translating an idiom found in African and West Indian languages. Related: Bad-mouthed; bad-mouthing.

SKILLED – (adj.) 1550s, past participle adjective from skill (v.) “to have personal and practical knowledge” (c.1200), from Old Norse skiljaseparate, part, divide; break off, break up; part company, take leave; discern, distinguish; understand, find out; decide, settle,” from the source of skill (n.).

–=–

Teaching particular skills as subjects has the design of separation, where deep knowledge is hidden in light of a particular subject matter. In this way, highly-skilled professionals are extremely low-skilled in everything else, and so never learn past what subject they are educated in. This creates specialists, which are perhaps the worst kind of advocate. For a specialist practices only his or her specialty, remaining purposefully blind to all other avenues of knowledge even when it co-relates to that specialty. In truth, knowledge knows no boundaries or subjection (subjects). But the best way to control a person is to limit their perspective, like placing blinders upon a horse.

Even physical education, hard work, and sleep for the common animals is part of the spell curriculum in school, where students can be recessed from mental education only to be breathed, slogged, and then napped:

BREATHE (n.) – c.1600, “a living creature, one who breathes,” agent noun from breathe. Meaning “spell of exercise to stimulate breathing” is from 1836; that of “a rest to recover breath” is from 1901.

SLOG (n.) – 1846, “a hard hit,” from slog (v.). Sense of “spell of hard work” is from 1888.

NAP (n.) – “short spell of sleep,” c.1300, from nap (v.). With take (v.) from c.1400.

–=–

Later in life or in adolescence, other profitable spells can be cast in the form of addiction or pointless habit to support the redundant commerce of the corporate state and syndicate:

SMOKE (n.2) – “cigarette,” slang, 1882, from smoke (n.1). Also “opium” (1884). Meaning “a spell of smoking tobacco” is recorded from 1835.

WORKOUT (n.) – 1909, “boxing bout for training,” from work (v.) + out (adv.). General sense of “spell of strenuous physical exercise” is attested by 1922. Verbal phrase work outsolve” (a problem, etc.) is from 1848. Sense of “succeed” attested by 1909.

–=–

Perhaps you will study and learn the magic of being a pharmacist… or perhaps a pharmaceutical advocate and expert witness?

PHARMACY (n.) – From late 14c., “a medicine,” from Old French farmaciea purgative” (13c.), from Medieval Latin pharmacia, from Greek pharmakeiause of drugs, medicines, potions, or spells; poisoning, witchcraft; remedy, cure,” from pharmakeus (fem. pharmakis) “preparer of drugs, poisoner, sorcorer” from pharmakondrug, poison, philter, charm, spell, enchantment.” Meaning “use or administration of drugs” is attested from c.1400; that of “place where drugs are prepared and dispensed” is first recorded 1833. The ph- was restored 16c. in French, 17c. in English (see ph).

PUNDIT (n.) –  From the 1670s, “learned Hindu,” especially one versed in Sanskrit lore, from Hindi payndita learned man, master, teacher,” from Sanskrit payndita-sa learned man, scholar,” of uncertain origin. Broader application in English is first recorded 1816. Related: Punditry.

CABBALA (n.) – From the 1520s, from Medieval Latin cabbala, from Mishnaic Hebrew qabbalahreception, received lore, tradition,” especially “tradition of mystical interpretation of the Old Testament,” from qibbelto receive, admit, accept.” Compare Arabic qabalahe received, accepted.”

Or perhaps you may be a student of war and occupation under the Leiber Code, taking a career in the military and attending an academy for the purposes of receiving the ultimate credential – a license to kill!!!

CADET (n.) – c.1610, “younger son or brother,” from French cadetmilitary student officer,” noun use of adjective, “younger” (15c.), from Gascon capdet “captain, chief, youth of a noble family,” from Late Latin capitellum, literally “little chief,” hence, “inferior head of a family,” diminutive of Latin caput “head” (see capitulum). “The eldest son being regarded as the first head of the family, the second son the cadet, or little head” [Kitchin].  Apparently younger sons from Gascon noble families were sent to French court to serve as officers, which gave the word its military meaning. In English, the meaning “gentleman entering the military as a profession” is from 1650s, and that of “student at a military college” is from 1775.

–=–

Lost in this sense of unfounded superiority and honor, Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language explains that the truth about career military men and women is far less noble or honorable when put into simplistic terms of art:

SOLDIER, noun soljur. [from Latin solidus, a piece of money, the pay of a soldier ] 1. A man engaged in military service; one whose occupation is military; a man enlisted for service in an army; a private, or noe in the ranks. There ought to be some time for sober reflection between the life of a soldier and his death. 2. A man enrolled for service, when on duty or embodied for military discipline; a private; as a militia soldier 3. Emphatically, a brave warrior; a man of military experience and skill, or a man of distinguished valor. In this sense, an officer of any grade may be denominated a soldier.

MER’CENARY, adjective [Latin mercenarius, from merces, reward, wages, mercor, to guy.] 1. Venal; that may be hired; actuated by the hope of reward; moved by the love of money; as a mercenary prince or judge. 2. Hired; purchased by money; as mercenary services; mercenary soldiers. 3. Sold for money; as mercenary blood. 4. Greedy of gain; mean; selfish; as a mercenary disposition. 5. Contracted from motives of gain; as a mercenary marriage. (noun) One who is hired; a soldier that is hired into foreign service; a hireling.

VE’NAL – adjective [Latin venalis, from venco, to be sold.] 1. Mercenary; prostitute; that may be bought or obtained for money or other valuable consideration; as a venal muse; venal services. 2. That may be sold; set to sale; as, all offices are venal in a corrupt government. 3. Purchased; as a venal vote.

PROS’TITUTE, verb transitive [Latin prostituo; pro and statuo, to set.] 1. To offer freely to a lewd use, or to indiscriminate lewdness. 2. To give up to any vile or infamous purpose; to devote to any thing base; to sell to wickedness; as, to prostitute talents to the propagation of infidel principles, to prostitute the press to the publication of blasphemy. 3. To offer or expose upon vile terms or to unworthy persons. – (adjective) Openly devoted to lewdness; sold to wickedness or to infamous purposes. Made bold by want and prostitute for bread. – (noun) 1. A base hireling; a mercenary; one who offers himself to infamous employments for hire.

MILI’TIA, noun [Latin from miles, a soldier; Gr. war, to fight, combat, contention. The primary sense of fighting is to strive, struggle, drive, or to strike, to beat, Eng. moil, Latin molior; Heb. to labor or toil.] The body of soldiers in a state enrolled for discipline, but not engaged in actual service except in emergencies; as distinguished from regular troops, whose sole occupation is war or military service. The militia of a country are the able bodied men organized into companies, regiments and brigades, with officers of all grades, and required by law to attend military exercises on certain days only, but at other times left to pursue their usual occupations.

–=–

The difference between a militia man and a military person should be clear at this point. For whom could be more an advocate (whore) of the syndicate than those who would kill others for profit on its behalf and in its name? Murder, even by any other name, is the primary degree of crime bestowed upon these mercenaries. A career soldier is not honorable. And so the artifice term of art by the name of “honor” is instilled into these mercenaries; a false religious belief that their actions are not merely for personal gain with the end of spreading the syndicate’s world monopolies by their boots, bullets, and bombs.

The horrific truth is that soldiers and police are hired to protect government and the syndicate from the people – to keep the people in their place as subjects and dependents.

Where is our militia to protect us from them?

–=–
Conclusion
–=–

The education of human animals is again not to offer self-actualizing wisdom or knowledge, but to instead create a class of persons that will not question the authority of the syndicate, its rules, and most importantly its opinions. The arrogance of those who wear this tempered status upon their lapel and hang their diplomas on their office wall is only a sign of how controllable that person is and how little it takes for him or her to sell their soul to the syndicate. Doctors peddle the syndicate’s drugs. Nurses peddle the syndicate’s vaccines. Attorneys peddle the syndicate’s statutes. Judges peddle the syndicates opinion’s. Teachers and professors peddle the syndicates history. And accountants peddle the syndicates double-books.

During the learning-to-labor process of education, as we work to achieve the proper level of control-ability (brain washing), we are allotted each semester what is called progress reports.

PROGRESS (n.) – From late 14c., “a going on, action of walking forward,” from Old French progres (Modern French progrès), from Latin progressusa going forward,” from past participle of progredi (see progression). In early use in English especially “a state journey by royalty.” Figurative sense of “growth, development, advancement to higher stages” is from c.1600. To be in progress “underway” is attested by 1849. Progress report attested by 1865.

PROGRESS (v.) – 1590s in the literal sense; c.1600 in the figurative sense, from progress (n.). OED says the verb was obsolete in English 18c. but was reformed or retained in America and subsequently long regarded in Britain as an Americanism. Related: Progressed; progressing.

PROGRESSIVE (adj.) – c.1600, “characterized by advancement” (in action, character, etc.), from progress (n.) + -ive, or else from French progressif, from past participle stem of Latin progredi. Of taxation, from 1889; of jazz, from 1947. Meaning “characterized by striving for change and innovation, avant-garde, liberal” is from 1908. In the socio-political sense “favoring reform; radically liberal,” it emerged in various British contexts from the 1880s; in the U.S. it was active as a movement in the 1890s and a generation thereafter, the name being taken again from time to time, most recently by some more liberal Democrats and other social activists, by c.2000. The noun in the sense “one who favors social and political change in the name of progress” is first attested 1865 (originally in Christianity). Earlier in a like sense were progressionist (1849, adjective; 1884, noun), progressist (1848). Related: Progressively; progressiveness.

–=–

To put this into perspective, it needs to be said here that at some point the idea of progression (progressiveness) with no means to an end is a dangerous calamity being sold to each new generation, with the purposeful intent to strain the ability of future generations to keep and cherish the values, ethics, and morals of their forefathers. How can a society be in a permanent state of progress and change? If progress is perpetual, then where does progress end? What is the purpose of a political foundation if not to prevent such oxymoronic political thought? This concept of unlimited or unending progress means that any ethical code or limits due to scriptural or other historical and sacred ethics and values attained by each advancement of progression will also necessarily need to be changed to fit the new progress and the people’s opinion of that progress. In this way the idea of liberalism being “one who favors social and political change in the name of progress” does not make sense as a permanent state of thought, but instead necessarily requires at some point in time that one’s liberal political stance must reverse itself when such progressive ideas have been met in one’s lifetime. Thus a political conservative must be created out of the satiated liberal who has attained his limited sensibility of what progress is in his lifetime based on defeating his own fathers morals, ethics, and values.

If progress is never-ending and seeks no limit, so too must be the degradation of all that is sacred and ethical.

For example, the medical practice of cloning has now jumped from of the pages of science fiction’s apocalyptic warnings into the hands of the industrialized syndicalists of the medical and scientific “progress” machine. It’s moral implications of yesterday must therefore also be progressed in the minds and beliefs of the new generations of mankind, or else such progress is just not possible as a publicly acceptable entity. Since there is no end to the  liberal (progressive) possibilities regarding progress, both in mind and in reality, we have just opened a perpetual paradox that includes ultimately such concepts as the opening of Pandora’s Box just to scientifically prove what is inside. All of this is ironically based upon the newer generations being “educated” with progressive ideals, which necessarily must go against the old ideals in order to have progress from them. The education syndicate is teaching ever more liberal progressive sentiments to every new generation. Eventually those ideals that seemed progressive as a student become reality in the life of the “graduated” student in his or her chosen career, essentially creating generational morals and ethics that can only be described as temporary in nature. And at some time in his or her life, that former student of education will ultimately become conservative (a waning to conserve) of his or her once liberal ideals, for they eventually will come to fruition in the progression of that lifetime. This is the way of unhindered progress. This is how the antiquated notion of evil is being effectually bred into cultural society through the washing of young brains with “education” at an ever quickening pace. The young animals are being corralled, conditioned, and credentialed as with the brand of a farmer upon his cattle. And the older, more refined, already credentialed and experienced former liberal-turned-conservative animals are too vested in this ever-progressing machine to stand up for their more mature values, for they will be retiring soon and bestowed with fat pensions for which making a risky stand this late in life is said to be left to the younger generations. So there is no one experienced left to make a stand, except for the un-credentialed, un-enfranchised, un-respected men like myself, whom reside outside of the box looking in while warning those inside that the seems of the box are about to break.

But alas, with no credentials, who will listen to the likes of me? The disenfranchised? The impoverished? The critical patients? Before they can curtail the progression that will make their life’s work obsolete, the elder conservatives can only watch helplessly as their modernly established and decaying ethics and their now conservative values crumble under progress’s charge, and a new generation takes over while the older ones sell out to progress for the sake of old-age insurance and monthly pension stipends.

In the end, we don’t ever beat them, we cooperatively join them against our best interest – in the interest of our wallets.

And the steamroller ride into the progressive unknown continues as loosely scheduled, with no schedule at all, no end, and with no inhibitions or limits. We progress purely in the name of progress, for progress’ sake, with the goal of unrepentant progress. For we do not teach our children well, and in our stead allow government to do it for us, selling our responsibility for the chance to have taxpayer funded daycare that will ensure a “common core” of progressively educated fools enjoying an educated and managed autistic epsilon workforce.

The children are being taught that their parents are way too conservative to be a part of their generation’s new progressiveness – same as the old progressiveness – just like the last generation and the ones before it and forward in perpetuity. And they are given the tools of fallacy and idealism – of progress without meaning or logical reasoning – to defeat our warnings and loving advice. It is a fitting revenge to pay us back for our own similar learned behavior towards our parents in our own liberal childhoods.

And most importantly, the media is right there to support the progression of insanity, changing subtly the meanings of words like liberal and conservative with each new election cycle, ensuring the generational gap called “progress”.

So are you educated?

Do you claim your degree (of crime) in the name of syndicalist progress?

Is your precious diploma in a frame upon your office wall?

Are your children’s progress reports hanging under magnets upon the fridge?

Are you your own worst nightmare, or are you allowing the syndicate to turn your own child into that?

–=–
The Syndicate In Action
–=–

Listed below are some of my own research projects delving into the designs and methods of the syndicate.

My research lecture (video) on Common Core, Globalization, and Agenda 21 (highly recommended):

https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2013/12/23/common-core-agenda-21-and-global-governance/

On the origins and purpose of Common Core:

https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2013/08/29/core-making-children-stupider-around-the-world/

https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2013/09/01/core-our-common-enemy/

https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2013/10/21/united-states-and-its-military-now-rotten-to-the-core/

On Social Security – now in over 130 nations! The mark of the beasts.

https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2012/04/24/social-security-the-international-mark-of-the-beast/

On Geo-Engineering now being taught as normal in schools:

https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2014/05/11/degrees-in-geo-engineering-and-sustainable-development/

On the financial side, the CAFR is everything, its rules created by private associations (many links inside):

https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2014/01/20/cafr-school-week-on-the-corporation-nation-radio/

.

Again, applying your own experiences in confronting this syndicate to the above information should clarify many things.

.

–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Thursday, November 6th, 2014

Stop The Religion Of The Fed


–=–

–=–

I remember many years ago when I sent an email to James Corbett at the Corbett Report in Japan asking him for advice on how… well, how to become more like himself! I had respect and still do for Mr. Corbett’s apparently open-mindedness and willingness to report independently the news around the world despite what the popular opinion might be. His emailed response was in hind sight a perfectly reasonable and genuine one, short and to the point, which was to advise me to simply keep on doing what I was currently doing.

And I did…

Today, in appreciation of that advice, I wish to respectfully and publicly criticize Mr. Corbett’s grammar, logic, and rhetoric when it comes to the Federal Reserve System. Logic of course is simply another word for dialectic, and apparently the common but fallacious dialectic that the Fed is a completely private banking system separate from government is prominent in James’s grammar. This is of course understandable to an extent, considering that this appeal to popular opinion permeates the alternative consciousness while amazingly not a shred of evidence supports it. And without doing the proper due diligence, pain, and suffering of countless hours of research and contemplation, it would be much easier to just go with the flow and call the Fed the enemy, while submitting to the notion that the poor little legislature has no power whatsoever over the actions of the Fed…

I can certainly attest to this notion of the power of popular belief, for when I began showing on my blog and speaking out about the primary sources that state that the Fed was certainly in no way separated from the government or completely “private” in the way that was being portrayed, I was personally attacked for my efforts. Not with fact, but with fallacious rhetoric.

But, as James suggested, I should simply keep doing what I was doing. And so I tarried through the ad hominem attacks and kept on researching and writing.

I then came out against the false Libertarian hero of the alternative media and movement, Dr. Ron Paul, showing again through only primary sources that this false prophet was not to be trusted. I went through Paul’s “End The Fed Bill” as well as his so-called “Audit The Fed Bill” and showed them to be complete frauds and completely against the rhetoric of the End the Fed crowd in that, quite logically, (1) If government (congress) can vote to end the Fed, then logically the Fed necessarily must be a part of the government, which of course created it in the first place. And (2) the audit the fed bill does nothing to actually create a new audit of the Fed or to reveal anything that can’t already be found in the CAFR audit. For the bill only modifies one of the current audits – the audits that supposedly don’t exist in the first place. This was getting ridiculous!

And so I attempted to present these facts by asking why everyone is fallaciously yelling “Audit The Fed” when it is already audited, even while that this fact is clearly stated within Ron Paul’s Audit the Fed bill and showing that all these audits are accessible on the Fed’s own website. More attacks!

Next, I attempted to ask Ron Paul why he never talked about the actual auditing system of government, the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) system, for which the Federal Reserve was required to fulfill its obligation to. I blogged that Ron Paul “fans” need to tell Mr. Paul to not only talk openly about the CAFR (complete audit) of the Fed but to post it on his website so that his “fans” can see that the Fed is already audited and has been since its inception.

And my demands fell on deaf ears…

Instead, I received more fallacious ad hominem attacks, still insisting that the Fed is not audited, that it is completely independent with no strings attached, and that Ron Paul was somehow the savior Christ incarnate.

I quickly figured out that I wasn’t simply up against sheer ignorance, I was up against an institution of purposefully prescribed ignorance, complete with T-shirts, bumper stickers, talking points, sales and marketing tools, and of course Ron Paul’s book sales and propaganda team. For it was much easier to blame the Fed than to admit to ourselves that we have allowed our government to become a monopoly – government as banker extraordinaire – and that men like Ron Paul are a part of that syndicate. The truther/patriot mentality would not allow proper grammar into the fold, and therefore the illogical dialectic had evolved into a sheer propaganda nightmare of epic proportions.

Yet all this time the real audit of the Fed laid in wait for its chance in the sun… and still does.

And that seems to be where it lays today, as easily accessible as ever and just a click away from realization – 500 pages of shear fact that dispels every single patriot myth alive today. But those who deal in disinformation have built an empire upon keeping the facts hidden in lieu of fallacy, and so the T-shirt and book sales keep on truckin’ while the entire world economy suffers due to a government agency that pretends to be non-governmental with the blessings of government.

But, as they say, the proof is in the pudding. And so in taking with the advice of Mr. James Corbett, I am keeping on with my efforts and thus presenting the plain proof here today, with all due respect to James, for I still think he is one of the best reporters out there. But even the best can believe in unprovable lies sometimes, especially when they are spouted around like religion and protected by grammar-less protectorates and paid shills, garnering applause and false praise at their very mention. If there is one thing about James, it is that he often goes against the norm.

I choose to believe that James is simply ignorant of the facts, that he is still able to change his mind when those primary source facts are presented to him, and that he is not so vested in the audit the Fed lie that he is still willing to publicly retract the lie and stand in truth with me, for the benefit of all. After all, it was his advice and encouragement that lead me to this point of exposing the lie.

First, we must examine the words spoken by Mr. Corbett in his recent podcast.

 

The rhetorical false dialectic ad populum made here by Mr. Corbett, promoting the institution of ignorance, goes like this:

“And for of those who continue to puppet the Fed’s own line that, “well, we already audit ourselves, it’s ok,” ah, they should be aware of 31 U.S. Code Section 714 sub-paragraph B, which lays out all of the exemptions by which, ah, the Federal Reserve does not have to be audited for transactions with central banks or foreign governments, transactions, ah, involving anything to do with monetary policy decisions including discount window operations, reserves of member banks, securities credit, interest on deposits, and open market operations, the don’t aud- they are not audited for transactions made under the direction of the FOMC (Federal Open MarketCommittee), and they are not audited for communication among members of the board or employees of the Federal Reserve System. So, again, there’s all sorts of exemptions that this au- Audit The Fed ah- bill would- would eliminate, and it would also make sure that the results of the audit were made available to congress. So, those are significant steps.This is not an insignificant bill. It’s not an insignificant thing. It’s only a tiny baby step towards the way of dismantling and tearing apart the Federal Reserve beast, but it is progress of a sort, and it does let us get our foot in the door to get people aware of that bigger picture. So for people who are interested in that, and have people in their lives who still don’t understand the Federal Reserve, or why it should be opposed, may I humbly suggest my own documentary, “Century of Enslavement: History of the Federal Reserve,” to get people aware of the nature of this beast and why and how it must be dismantled.”

–=–

Now, in correction of these many fallacious comments, I wish to do the service of dispelling them with the primary sources and logical rhetoric based on those sources (proper grammar that is) while showing how James Corbett is so easily misled by the dialectical that has been set up to purposefully push him and other well-intended folks into that irrational thought process. And so let’s break down each logical fallacy as we break down each erroneous statement above.

I wish to disclaim here once again that I have the full respect and admiration for Mr. Corbett and that this is in no way intended to disparage his name or reputation for otherwise wonderful insight and reporting. But I will say that the facts provided here demand a retraction and restatement of the facts surrounding the Federal Reserve System to his “fans” so that, in the future, the correct course of action may be taken and so that ridiculous bills like that of Ron Paul’s Audit the Fed bill don’t continue to fool the masses into pointless distraction. As I have learned along the way, one must be responsible with their opinions, and I only respect those who may change their opinion even when they are invested in the lie with documentaries and past statements. The ego has no place in a movement designated with the word truth. And to forgive is divine…

–=–
The Reality
–=–

I have come to the conclusion after so many years of attempting disclosure of the facts that comprehension is not possible because of the religious-like faith and belief that even the most staunch activists have in their government. This seemingly unavoidable conditioning is ensured via the “waking up” process, which unerringly leads to shock jocks and disinfo agents selling the story. That is to say that there is a firm belief that the government and its creation, the Federal Reserve Board and System, are actually competing against each other; that government is somehow just another victim of the Federal Reserve. This holy misunderstanding creates the foundation for the dialectic (logic) which leads to false rhetoric and mythos about the Fed. And so we must be clear as we delve into reality that there is no real competition here and that government is all one entity, including it’s many “independent agencies”.

One of the most important Maxim’s of law is simply that the creator controls.

When applied to the Federal Reserve System, we can simply read the Federal Reserve Act (primary source) and come to no other conclusion than that the Federal Reserve Board and system was indeed created by Congress. Thus, it is patently incorrect to state that the Federal reserve is independent or separate from government, without first stating that such forms (titles) of independence and separation are only what Congress (the creator) allows in its statutes. Under no circumstances does the Fed act “outside of the law”, for in law the creator always controls.

Inversely, there stems confusion by the fact that the Federal Reserve Board is allowed by its creator to make its own rules.

Our Maxim’s of law also state that a fiction of law can make no law. In other words, the law-maker (congress) creates fictions of law, which in turn being creations (fictions) of law, have no power to make laws themselves. This is the role of the Federal Reserve.

–=–

“There is no fiction without law”

“Fictions arise from the law, and not law from fictions.”

–=–

Bouvier’s 1856 Dictionary of Law defines what a Fiction Of Law is:

FICTION OF LAW – The assumption that a certain thing is true, and which gives to a person or thing, a quality which is not natural to it, and establishes, consequently, a certain disposition, which, without the fiction, would be repugnant to reason and to truth. It is an order of things which does not exist, but which the law prescribe; or authorizes. It differs from presumption, because it establishes as true, something which is false; whereas presumption supplies the proof of something true…The law never feigns what is impossible – fictum est id quod factum non est sed fieri potuit. Fiction is like art; it imitates nature, but never disfigures it it aids truth, but it ought never to destroy it. It may well suppose that what was possible, but which is not, exists; but it will never feign that what was impossible, actually is. Fictions were invented by the Roman praetors, who, not possessing the power to abrogate the law, were nevertheless willing to derogate from it, under the pretense of doing equity. Fiction is the resource of weakness, which, in order to obtain its object, assumes as a fact, what is known to be contrary to truth: when the legislator desires to accomplish his object, he need not feign, he commands. Fictions of law owe their origin to the legislative usurpations of the bench. 4. It is said that every fiction must be framed according to the rules of law, and that every legal fiction must have equity for its object. To prevent, their evil effects, they are not allowed to be carried further than the reasons which introduced them necessarily require. The law abounds in fictions

–=–

The Federal Reserve is nothing more or less than a fiction of law – an association of persons incorporated within the law to act under the law. It deals in mostly imaginary currency (non-paper or coin) called credit, in a purely imaginary fictional realm. It is the banker in a pretend monopoly game. It is the creator of currency, which it thus controls via the powers and laws granted by Congress and the very limited independence that congress allows one of its own created corporations.

This independence is no different than the independence bestowed by the creator congress to the board of the Postal Service, the board of Social Security Administration (investment insurance scheme), or any other board of any other corporation or institution created by congress. They are all creatures of law, allowed to make their own rules to govern themselves in the absence of daily oversight by congress itself. It’s really quite simple and logical. Yet we are not bothered by the independence of say the the Post Office, while at the same time we would not expect to see a member of congress behind each Post Office desk in-taking letters and packages.

Why not? Stamps are also considered money, are they not?

According to its own data, The USPS employed 626,764 workers (as of January 2014) and operated 211,654 vehicles in 2013. So how do we think that the Post Office would exist without a certain bit of political independence from Congress?

There can’t be a congressman posted at every post office in America now can there?

This word independence has been tweaked and twisted by authors and radio shock jocks so as to mean something other than what it actually does in politics (fiction). But everything Congress creates is created with independence. And honestly unless this is the case, Congress would have no time to do anything but run its own creation.

From WhiteHouse.Gov we read:

“There are hundreds of federal agencies and commissions charged with handling such responsibilities as managing America’s space program, protecting its forests, and gathering intelligence. For a full listing of Federal Agencies, Departments, and Commissions, visit USA.gov.”

And from that link on USA.gov we read:

“The Federal Reserve is the central bank of the United States. It formulates and administers credit and monetary policy.”

The word of, in law, means “belonging to”. The popular or common concept of independence does not refer to ownership, only to operation.

The word policy is not law. Webster’s 1828 defines policy as “In common usage, the art, prudence or wisdom of individuals in the management of their private or social concerns… Stratagem; cunning; dexterity of management… Art, prudence, wisdom or dexterity in the management of public affairs; applied to persons governing. The word policy is used also for the writing which insures against other events, as well as against loss of property.”

Policies are simply the internal rules of the agency, not the laws of the United States. Only the legislature can create laws, and those laws govern the fictions created within, like the Federal Reserve System and Board. But the board is allowed to make some rules governing its institution, since congress cannot babysit every one of its created agencies. I’m sorry to say that there is nothing more to the word independence than that, and that there is really no conspiracy here at all, just normal governance through the creation of independent agencies of government to manage the affairs of government. So stop blaming the agencies of government for government’s actions. The creator controls!!!

Listed under that heading “independent agencies of government” is all of these agencies of government allowed to act independently under their boards and commissions, including the “Federal Reserve System”. And it gives the website (http://www.federalreserve.gov/) for more information, which is where the Federal Reserve CAFR and other audits are housed for public utilization.

To give you an idea of just how many independent agencies of government there are, here is just a partial selection of the listings starting with only the letter F. Notice that no special place is given to the Federal Reserve System, for it is simply just another of hundreds of associations that Congress creates to manage the affairs of the United States Corporation. Clicking on any of these independent agencies of government brings you to its prospective website, including the Federal Reserve.

–=–

Now, do you honestly take issue with this perfectly logical and reasonable list of independent agencies? Do you honestly think that the Congress with its 538 or so members could possibly run all of these agencies from the halls of congress? Is there a reason that you don’t hold up a sign, for instance, that says END THE FTA?

Understandably, the concept of ending what is the 5th plank of the Communist Manifesto – “Centralization of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with state capital and exclusive monopoly” – is a perfectly reasonable endeavor for a people that can only be described today as debt slaves to that system. However, while callously parading around such a notion in felt tip pen and cardboard, the thought of a replacement never seems to cause concern to most armchair activists. For the Fed is just part of the government, remember. So while the Fed system and banks might disappear, the central government remains perfectly intact, and still holds patent on the monopoly money. And the government has instituted all 10 planks of the communist manifesto by law, not just this one. And the other 9 planks don’t need the Federal Reserve to exist!

In fact, it is my own speculation that the collapse of the Federal Reserve would lead to one and only one thing – takeover by the world bank via loans and collateralization – which in my opinion is the goal of the government-bankers who run the Fed in the first place. Let the people believe they have defeated a small subsection of evil within the greater unseen evil by ending the Fed, and then watch helplessly as the United States is handed over to the United Nations and World Bank like every other nation, creating the ultimate manifestation of a world central bank; a bail-out like no other. But that’s merely my own opinion.

Back to the facts…

I present this information here for only one purpose, which is to show the reader that the conspiracy is not the independent agency, but the controller of that agency. For the agency has no power without its mother corporation. By promoting the patriot myth that these entities are separate in any other way than operationally creates a false dialectic that they are also in conflict or competition with each other. And in the stage-play of congressional hearings and meetings, we watch as this notion is played out for the benefit of the masses. But indeed, all they are doing is playing the parts assigned to them as agents (actors).

And here is the most important thing to contemplate…

The only reason that the chairman of the Federal Reserve can tell Congress “no” to the requests for information by Congress while in session is because the Congress voted on a bill to allow that power to the chairman.

These are nothing more than actors; agents of the government. By creating the appearance of competition and the tying of hands the illusion is set to make the audience believe the fictional tale being presented. Good guy vs. bad guy. Left vs. right. Democrat vs.Republican. House vs. Senate. Congress vs. Fed.

Its the classic rhetoric of organized crime. Many fingers of the same hand pretending to be different and opposing one another, all the while controlled by the same hand.

Ironically, if anything, the bill introduced by Ron Paul entitled “End The Fed”  stands as a very clear acknowledgement that Congress can end the fed (its own creation) at any time it wishes, through a simple vote. This is because of the fact that it is a federal agency of congress, and is its master no matter how much independence is bestowed upon it by its creator. And yet this simple logic is not acknowledged for some reason when speaking of the independence concept. But it shows that Congress the creator has ultimate power over what it created, including the invoking of the Fed’s immediate demise at the stroke of a pen. After all, the Fed is just a fiction of law, and therefore has no standing against law. This elegant truth stands as a perfect example of how a false dialectic (logic) has been built not from proper grammar, but from sheer word-of-mouth nonsense; usually from those selling products, storable food, gold and silver, and other commodities while using this fictional tale of independence and competition as its backbone of fear.

Well I have nothing to sell… And as history shows, it is usually the retail outfitters that supply goods and services that make out like bandits, not those searchers of the thing coveted or the cowards of the thing feared, and not the gold-diggers and hoarders of those goods. Strange, unreasonable, fear-based commerce indeed…

–=–
Breaking Down The Fallacies
–=–

Let us break down the fallacious statement by Mr. Corbett, piece by piece, by offering the opposing factual and primary information as its counter.

To start, let me provide you here with the primary resources that I referred to above, including the very long, full audit of the Federal Reserve called the Annual Report of the Board of Governors, otherwise known as the CAFR, as well as that of the individual banks – the audit of the Federal Reserve System and Banks:

From the Fed Board’s Website:

CAFR Annual Reports for the Board and the Individual Federal Reserve banks:

Federal Reserve Board CAFR (back to 1995) –> http://www.federalreserve.gov/publications/annual-report/default.htm

CAFR’s for individual banks –> http://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/bst_fedfinancials.htm

New York Fed Bank CAFR –> http://www.newyorkfed.org/aboutthefed/annualreports.html

Quarterly Reports on Balance Sheets –> http://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/quarterly-balance-sheet-developments-report.htm

For our purposes, we will use the most recent CAFR for fiscal year (fy) 2013.

You may also view my previous research articles here, thoroughly exposing this fraud, and presenting any facts not re-presented herein:

The Incontrovertible Conundrum Of Dr. Ron Paul –> https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2012/06/23/the-incontrovertible-conundrum-of-dr-ron-paul/

Today’s Creatures From Jekyll Island –> https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2012/09/01/todays-creatures-from-jekyll-island/

–=–

And so that there is no confusion here, the above links are for the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, which is the full audit of the Fed. This is not to be confused with the completely separate, purposefully incomplete and misleading GAO audit of the Comptroller General of the United States, which is the only subject of the Audit the Fed bills from Ron Paul and the current version spoken about above by Mr. Corbett. These two audits are completely different and separate from each other. They should not ever be confused as being the same audit report, except by the fact that both are requirements of the creator (Congress) and its prescribed laws. It is this false notion that is at the heart of the confusion. The Fed has no choice but to comply with those laws because it is a creation of that Congress and subservient to it.

Unfortunately, part of Mr. Corbett’s dialectic as presented is that the audit produced by Title 31, Section 714 is the only audit available, or at least the only one to take into consideration. Both of these notions are false. For the CAFR is just as available to the public as it is to Congress, and it has nothing to do wit Title 31, Section 714. The reality is that Congress, including former congressman Ron Paul and his son, purposefully ignore and remain silent about the full audit of the Fed – the CAFR. If I can link it to you here, do you honestly think it’s that hard to find by the Congress itself, who requires the Fed to create the CAFR under its own laws BUT NEVER SPEAKS OF IT IN CONGRESSIONAL SESSION?

As far as the actual act in question presented within the Audit The Fed bill(s), it only refers to the other incomplete audit of the GAO and not the CAFR. In regards to this seemingly strange notion, please understand that Congress passed this restrictive act – Title 31, Section 714 – the subject of the entirety of the “Audit The Fed” bill(s) – in the first place, in order to restrict itself!!! In other words, Congress itself limited the audit ability of the Comptroller General as it is reported to Congress. The average person reading this most likely thinks that the Federal Reserve is a rogue agency that refuses by its own will to allow its transactions listed within Title 31, Section 714 to be audited. But this is a congressional act! The Fed is simply obeying the law set out by congress when in high Hollywood fashion it refuses the information that Congress asks for. Congress already knows that the Fed will refuse it before it asks, because congress wrote the law that requires the Fed to with-hold that same information in the first place. This is a Hollywood production you fools!

To make this ever more clear, the audit is only done in the first place because it is required by congress. The Ron Paul campaign and Audit The Fed bill(s) only served to change a rule that Congress – not the Federal Reserve or the Comptroller General – already voted into law in 1978 – called the Federal Banking Agency Audit Act (TITLE 31, Section 714). The Fed has nothing to do with this fact and has no authority whatsoever to change or deny this law. In other words, it is Congress itself [the government corporation] that is currently keeping this information off of the Comptroller General’s audit to itself, and thus out of the realm of public or legislative disclosure within public sessions of congress. Understand this, and you understand controlled opposition politics and how the Untied States legislature runs as nothing but a Hollywood production and consensus gaining company.

Now I’m willing to bet that James Corbett has not read the very subject of his rhetoric, the comptroller’s audit itself. He certainly has not read or at least comprehended the Federal Reserve Act and the laws that very clearly require the audits. And finally, it is painfully obvious that Mr. Corbett has not even looked at the index of the CAFR report, since it shows each thing not allowed in the Comptroller’s audit to be audited in the CAFR.

Firstly, he states that the Fed “audits ourselves”, referring to myself apparently as a “puppet”. Big mistake, dude!

Here we go…

#1 The auditing process of the Fed works the same way as any other auditing process works in any other government or business. The Fed creates its financial statements, called the CAFR or annual report, and then and only then does an independent auditing firm get hired to audit the financial statements themselves. Thus, to call the unaudited financial statements an audit is not technically correct, and is just another misunderstanding by the patriot folks who do not actually read the audited reports. We call the finished product post-audit an audit report simply because the financial reports are thus audited. So this first fallacy is absolutely wrong, for the Fed statements are audited by an outside company.

In it’s letter of transmittal, the CAFR states:

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
Washington, D.C.
May 2013

The Speaker of the House of Representatives:

Pursuant to the requirements of section 10 of the Federal Reserve Act, I am pleased to submit the ninety-ninth
annual report of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

This report covers operations of the Board during calendar year 2012.

Sincerely,
Ben Bernanke
Chairman

–=–

Notice that this report is presented to the Speaker of the House! Are you really going to tell me now that the Congress doesn’t have access to the CAFR (annual report)? This is not the same audited report as the GOA audit, obviously, as we are reading here from page 4 (of the pdf) of the CAFR itself – not the GAO audit.

Also notice that this report is required by congress, the creator of the Federal Reserve Act as amended. This is not a choice!

We read in the CAFR:

Federal Reserve System Audits

The Board of Governors, the Federal Reserve Banks, and the Federal Reserve System as a whole are all subject to several levels of audit and review. The Board’s financial statements are audited annually by an outside auditor retained by the Board’s Office of Inspector General. The outside auditor also tests the Board’s compliance with certain laws and regulations affecting those statements.

The Reserve Banks’ financial statements are audited annually by an independent outside auditor retained by the Board of Governors. In addition, the Reserve Banks are subject to annual examination by the Board. As discussed in the chapter “Federal Reserve Banks,” the Board’s examination includes a wide range of ongoing oversight activities conducted on site and off site by staff of the Board’s Division of Reserve Bank Operations and Payment Systems.

The OIG also conducts audits, reviews, and investigations relating to the Board’s programs and operations as well as to Board functions delegated to the Reserve Banks, and Federal Reserve operations are also subject to review by the Government Accountability Office.

–=–

And on page 99 we read:

The Federal Reserve Board engaged Deloitte & Touche LLP (D&T) to audit the 2012 combined and individual financial statements of the Reserve Banks and those of the consolidated VIEs.15 In 2012, D&T also conducted audits of internal controls over financial reporting for each of the Reserve Banks,Maiden Lane LLC,Maiden Lane III LLC, and TALF LLC. Fees for D&T’s services totaled $7 million, of which $1 million was for the audits of the consolidated VIEs. To ensure auditor independence, the Board requires that D&T be independent in all matters relating to the audits. Specifically, D&T may not perform services for the Reserve Banks or others that would place it in a position of auditing its own work, making management decisions on behalf of the Reserve Banks, or in any other way impairing its audit independence. In 2012, the Banks did not engage D&T for any non-audit services. One Bank leases office space to D&T.”

–=–

And we can finally read about the very different and separate GAO audit on page 409, to see the origin and novelty of that separate and unrelated audit report:

Government Accountability Office Reviews

The Federal Banking Agency Audit Act (Pub. L. No. 95–320) authorizes the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to audit certain aspects of Federal Reserve System operations. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (Dodd-Frank Act) directs GAO to conduct additional audits with respect to these operations. Many of these Dodd-Frank-mandated audits have now been completed, but not all. In addition, the GAO has initiated its own review of financial regulators’ progress on implementing Dodd-Frank Act regulations.

In 2012, the GAO completed 21 projects that involved the Federal Reserve (table 1). Ten projects remained open as of December 31, 2012 (table 2). Some of the major projects that GAO has undertaken include a study of the Independent Foreclosure Review process; a review of Board and Reserve Bank offices of Minority and Women Inclusion and the diversity of the Federal Reserve System workforce; a review of enforcement of the Service members Civil Relief Act; and several studies on the costs and benefits associated with the implementation of the Dodd-Frank Act.

–=–

In point of fact, the GAO audit that is referred to in the Audit The Fed bills was never intended to be a full audit of the Fed system in the first place. It is a specific targeted audit of the items and transactions that the GAO is specifically looking for. It does not need a full audit for its purposes. If it did, then it would simply use the CAFR and save its auditors the trouble and expense of re-auditing the same exact thing over again. The GAO even refers readers to the CAFR (annual report) for the full financial audits!

In reference to these bills that would lift the constraints placed on the GAO’s audit authority over the Federal Reserve, Angell stated:

“The benefits, if any, of broadening the GAO’s authority into the areas of monetary policy and transactions with foreign official entities would be small.  With regard to purely financial audits, the Federal Reserve Act already requires that the Board conduct an annual financial examination of each Reserve Bank (CAFR)… The process of conducting financial audits is reviewed by a public accounting firm to confirm that the methods and techniques being employed are effective and that the program follows generally accepted auditing standards… Further, a private accounting firm audits the Board’s balance sheet… Finally, and more broadly, the Congress has, in effect, mandated its own review of monetary policy by requiring semiannual reports to Congress on monetary policy under the Full Employment and Balanced Growth Act of 1978… In addition, there is a vast and continuously updated body of literature and expert evaluation of U.S. monetary policy.  In this environment, the contribution that a GAO audit would make to the active public discussion of the conduct of monetary policy is not likely to outweigh the disadvantages of expanding GAO audit authority in this area.”

–=–

Mr. Corbett and so many others are simply victims of a slight of hand game. The various audits that take place within the Fed are stated clearly here, and yet the “Audit The Fed” bills always only refer to the single audit of the GAO, which is the least important audit of all with respect to the budgetary purposes of congress. For the GAO audit is meant to be specialized and incomplete by design!!!

No wonder the bill is not being passed. It’s just a redundancy of the CAFR! And again, the conspiracy is not within the Fed, it’s the government itself, and it will continue to play out these stage shows as long as you fall for their tricks. In fact, it would not surprise me at all if congress passes the bill simply to fool the End and Audit the Fed movement into believing they had a small victory. And the shock jocks and bumper-sticker suppliers will tout it as a big win, though nothing at all will become of it. Why? Because the audit is already there, and the congress ignores it already. LOL!

And so we now know that an audit is in fact done very much independently from the fed, making the true puppets in reality James Corbett and all others who puppet the notion that the Fed “audits itself”. This simply is not true, as shown above. The Fed does not audit itself any more than any other corporation out there. Instead it follows the legal process of auditing under the laws of the United States. I’m not here to suggest that this is a good or bad system, just to show how it works. Fallacy negated.

We also now know that the bill in question would not create any new audit, and would only serve to modify the already existing GAO audit, which in reality is just a redundancy, since the House receives a copy of the fully audited CAFR from the Board of Directors of the Fed – not by choice but by law of congress. And in that CAFR we can un-miraculously find everything missing from the GAO audit report…

One down, many fallacies to go…

#2 Mr. Corbett expresses the fact that as per U.S. Code Title 31, Section 714, and I quote “the Federal Reserve does not have to be audited for transactions with central banks or foreign governments, transactions, ah, involving anything to do with monetary policy decisions including discount window operations, reserves of member banks, securities credit, interest on deposits, and open market operations, they don’t aud- they are not audited for transactions made under the direction of the FOMC (Federal Open Market Committee), and they are not audited for communication among members of the board or employees of the Federal Reserve System.”

But is this an accurate statement?

No. Not at all. Unless you do as he has and limit yourself to just this one restricted report from the GAO, thus creating your own fallacious dialectic. And why not, that’s the point isn’t it? To obfuscate and restrict the information presented in the real audit (CAFR) so that the people don’t know about it? The CAFR is certainly inclusive of this information, and the above items and transactions are indeed audited within.

I suppose we could say he is correct that this information is kept out of just one of the redundant audits, the one referred to as the GOA audit. But the whole point I am trying to make here is that this is mere subterfuge, because the congress receives the CAFR too, making the GAO audit report absolutely pointless… unless it’s designed and used to confuse and obfuscate, which it has done to Mr. Corbett!

So let’s go to the index and Table of Contents and see what we can find in the 2013 CAFR that is apparently not allowed to be audited…

How about the open market committees? Apparently in the mythos these meetings are secret, according to the ridiculous Audit the Fed bill, and thus must be voted upon to be included in the GAO audit report.

But is this correct? Does this mean that the information is not audited elsewhere?

Did anyone bother to check the full audit, the CAFR, for any of this information? Surely it can’t be in there, can it?

Oh, wait a minute. In the table of contents its states the following:

Minutes of Federal Open Market Committee Meetings….. 123

Meeting Held on January 24–25, 2012 ………………………. 124
Meeting Held on March 13, 2012 ………………………………. 156
Meeting Held on April 24–25, 2012 …………………………… 166
Meeting Held on June 19–20, 2012 ……………………………. 191
Meeting Held on July 31–August 1, 2012 ……………………. 216
Meeting Held on September 12–13, 2012 ……………………. 227
Meeting Held on October 23–24, 2012 ……………………….. 251
Meeting Held on December 11–12, 2012 …………………….. 261

–=–

Well then… the actual minutes of the actual meetings of the Open Market Committee, presented right in the audited financial statements of government? It can’t be, according to the myth. But there it is. Why? Because the CAFR is the full audit of the Federal Reserve, and it is not restricted by Title 31, Section 714.

Just because Congress chooses to ignore the CAFR doesn’t mean it does not exist. And that goes for you too, Mr. Corbett.

So what else can we find in the CAFR that is “not allowed to be audited” in the GAO audit?

Let’s go to the index and see, shall we?

Here’s a list of things apparently “not allowed to be audited” right here, somehow audited in the CAFR:

Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC). See also: Open market operations

Annual organizational matters, 125–127
Appropriate monetary policy, 144, 150, 152, 181, 186,
188, 209, 213, 244, 248, 278, 281
Authorizations, 127–130
Consensus forecast, 225–226, 237
Domestic policy directives, 5–6
Forecast uncertainty, 155, 190, 215, 250, 285
Foreign currency operations and directives, 128–138
Meeting minutes, 123–285
Members, 416
Monetary policy strategies and communications, 44–48, 164–165, 167, 217
Notation votes, 140, 165, 176, 202, 226, 237, 260, 271
Officers, 416
Policy actions, 44–48, 138–140, 162–164, 173–176, 199–202, 223–225, 235–237, 258–260, 269–271
Policy compliance, 100
Responsibilities, 349–350
Statement on longer-run goals and strategy, 7
Summary of Economic Projections, 6, 47–48, 123, 140–154, 177–189, 203–214, 237–249, 272–284
System Open Market Account, 127–128, 150, 157, 167, 217–218, 253

Open market operations. See also Federal Open Market Committee

Open Market – Open Market Desk, 16–17, 41 ,46
Volume of transactions, 289–290

Securities credit, 74

Monetary policy

Alternative scenarios, 167
Communications, 164–165
Developments and outlook, 44–48
Expectations, 22–26, 38–39
Overview, 5–6, 180
Statement on longer-run goals and strategy, 7, 131–132

Monetary policy reports to Congress

February 2013, 5–26
July 2012, 27–48

Foreign currency operations:

Authorization, 128 –130
Denominated assets, 355–356, 372–374
Directives, 130
Liquidity swaps, 357, 374
Procedural instructions, 130–138
Foreign economies, 133–134, 158, 169, 195–196
etc…

Deposits

Depository institutions, 19–20, 359
Federal Reserve Banks, 295, 300–301, 359
Treasury, 359

Depository institutions

Deposits, 19–20, 359
Discount rates, 121–122
Reserve requirements, 292
Reserves of, 294–295, 298–301

Federal Reserve Banks

Accounting policies, 350–363
Assessments, 361
Assets and liabilities, 19–20, 294–295, 298–299
Audits, 319–341
Automated clearinghouse (ACH) services, 93
Balance sheets, 19–20, 41–42, 132, 150, 157, 167, 193,
217–218, 228, 253, 262
Branches, 293, 420–433
Capital, 348, 359
Cash-management services, 97
Collection services, 96–97
Commercial check collection service, 92–93
Commitments and contingencies, 395–396
Condition statements, 304–308, 346
Conferences, 434–435
Credit outstanding, 294–295, 298–301
Currency and coin operations and developments, 94–95
Deposits, 295, 359
Directors, 420–431
Economic growth projections, 141
Equipment and software, 393–395
Examinations, 53, 99–100
Fair value, 361–362
FedLine access to services, 98
Fedwire Funds Service, 93
Fedwire Securities Service, 93–94
Financial statements, 105–110, 342–407
Fiscal agency services, 95–97
Float, 94
Government depository services, 95–97
Income and expenses, 95, 100–101, 309–314, 347, 360, 405, 407
Information technology, 98–99
Interest rates on depository institutions loans, 292
Intraday credit, 97–98
Investments of consolidated VIEs, 102
Lending, 101–102
Loans and other credit extensions, 294, 296–297, 298–299, 363–368
National Settlement Service, 93
Notes outstanding, 20, 358–359
Officers, 316, 432–433
Open market transactions, 289–290
Operations, volume of, 315
Operations and services, 349–350
Payments services, 96
Postemployment benefits, 404
Postretirement benefits, 402–404
Premises, 102–104, 317, 358, 393–395
Priced services, 91–94
Recovery of direct and indirect costs, 91–92
Restructuring charges, 362, 405–406
Retail securities programs, 96
Retirement plans, 396–401
Risk management, 94
Salaries of officers and employees, 316 442 99th Annual Report | 2012
Securities holdings, 100–101, 291, 298–
Structure, 349
Supervisory information technology, 69
System OpenMarket Account holdings and loans, 100–102, 368–377
Taxes, 362
Thrift plans, 401
Treasury securities services, 95–96
Wholesale securities programs, 96

Foreign Assets Control, Office of (OFAC), 66

Foreign banks. See also specific banks by name

Deposits, 295, 300–301
Prudential standards, 50, 51, 111–112
Supervision of, 57–58
U.S. activities, 51, 58, 73

Foreign currency operations

Authorization, 128–130
Denominated assets, 355–356, 372–374
Directives, 130
Liquidity swaps, 357, 374
Procedural instructions, 130–138

Credit (i.e. Discount Window Operations)

Availability, 11–12, 14, 18, 159, 170, 172–173, 195, 231
Consumer credit, 31, 255, 265
Corporate, 14
Primary, 121–122
Risk, 383–385
Index 439
Seasonal, 121–122
Secondary, 121–122

–=–

Now, I could go on listing more and more detail from the index of the Fed audit, but I have provided here a place in the CAFR for each item that is supposedly “not allowed to be audited”. And so please do your due diligence, Mr. Corbett and all others, and stop fallaciously naming those of us who actually do the research and read the primary data as the “puppets”, when in fact the puppet is you, parroting patriot mythology based on no solid evidence at all.

As for your other demeaning rhetoric to “those who do not understand the nature of the beast that is the Federal Reserve System” like you supposedly do, I can only say that your ego is apparent here when in plain fact it should not be. Perhaps you need to be reminded about the difference between reporting “news” and having proper grammar to feed your rhetorical reporting?

In the end, Mr. Corbett, I have written this piece not to offend you (as you did generally to me with your referential parrot comment), or to harm your reputation. On the contrary, I am writing to you today in order that you would save your reputation with me, an admirer, who has caught you here with no clothes. I’m not only asking for but demanding a retraction of what I believe to be your own fallacious incomprehension of the Federal Reserve and its place among government and UNDER government control. I recognize you here as the victim, not the criminal, or so I hope. Just as I too fell for the lies and mythology without checking the cold hard facts not so long ago, I redeemed myself and suffered the blow-back by truly speaking to the reality of the Fed. But I took your advice after so many attacks and kept on doing what I was doing, and ironically our roads have diverged on this subject due to your advice and my diligent research. My goal is to inform our fellow man that this Fed story is a fraud, and at best a distraction into the notion of a false competitive dialectic by a completely corrupt government legislature. I simply ask that you be a beacon of what the so-called truth movement is supposed to be about by doing the right thing and exposing not only the truth about the Fed and these bogus bills, but to also confirm to your “fans” the very difficult admission that even the best and most respected of us can be fooled into a false dialectic – false logic and rhetoric caused by very well laid misinformation and false grammar. In short, I only ask that you tell the people, unlike Ron Paul has, that the CAFR is the audit of the Fed and of every other independent agency of government in existence (fiction), and to quit promoting the notion that an audit does not exist. For clearly the CAFR as revealed above and in my own research is the audit you seek. And this new bill will not change anything about this reality. And the audit of the Fed will continue as it always has…

With great respect and position comes great responsibility.

So do the right thing.

Retract immediately (or immediately after proper action in studying the grammar provided here) the fallacious rhetoric you have helped to spread about the Fed as I have, and encourage others to do the same. Be what you are meant to be, James.

Or… Somehow prove me to be in error! For the burden of proof has been fulfilled on my end in triplicate here today.

Signed, with all due respect,

The Anti-Puppet.

.

–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Monday, October 27th, 2014

Cracking The Cult Of The Constitution (Part II)


–=–

—————————————————————————-
Cracking The Cult Of The Constitution
Part II: Squaring The Past
—————————————————————————-

–=–

Welcome to Part two of this essay series. Continuing from where we left off, the comprehension in the reader that the constitution of the United States – thanks to multiple declared “national emergency’s” – is no longer a part of the current political setting in America or the world must be clear. The constitution grants no rights to men. It has no power but that wielded from its congress, interpreted by Congress’s statutory court under the Executive Branch, and whether constitutional or unconstitutional, the laws of government are enforced violently by that Executive Branch under military rule (Lieber Code). Having been verified in the U.S. Code, from within the congressional record, and through the obvious and blatant actions of Congress and the Executive, acknowledging the constitution’s suspension is a necessary step in overcoming the cognitive dissonance continuously shrouded over us through govern-ment (mind control) and the distraction of enter-tain-ment (the entering and holding of the mind). The constitution is used today as nothing more than a religious (Ecclesiastical) and unquestioning tool of justification (Justice) for government to commit atrocities in its tyranny – romanticized abuse. This understanding that the Executive Branch (the military enforcement arm) of the United States government is no longer bound to Congress (by its own choice) or by the constitution itself is a prerequisite for continuing down this road of discovery and sobriety.

If this is not clear, I would suggest going back to the prerequisite part 1 of this essay, here:

(link) https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2013/08/05/cracking-the-cult-of-the-constitution-part-i/

Some will turn away from this information, stating as a defense that they have faith in government and in their particular corporate church.

But how is faith defined legally within the church and govern-ment?

From black’s Law 1st edition:

FAITH. 1. Confidence; credit; reliance. Thus, an act may be said to be done “on the faith” of certain representations. 2. Belief; credence; trust. Thus, the constitution provides that “full faith and credit” shall be given to the judgments of each state in the courts of the others. 3. Purpose; intent; sincerity; state of knowledge or design. This is the meaning of the word in the phrases “good faith” and “bad faith”. In Scotch law. A solemn pledge* an oath. “To make faithis to swear, with the right hand uplifted, that one will declare the truth.

Remember the sacramentum; the sacred oath? Remember the God Trust as the full faith and credit of the United States and its dollar that holds you, your children, and your property as surety and collateral? And don’t you wonder why the constitution would simply assume that the judgements of any court of law is automatically good for everyone in every state, very much like the doctrine of religion? Does that sound like a fair trial to you?

As a “state of knowledge”, faith represents ignorance as “belief without fact”. Is that really where God would want his children to be – lead by the bloodline of royal corporations as governments who demand faith over reason and nature? The Bible says no.

Join me now for a pictorial and documented view of the United States and its history like you’ve never seen it before…

–=–
A Dark Authority
–=–

Perhaps you, as I have for so long, have wondered where exactly the “Authority” of government comes from?

What gives police authority to beat my head, shoot, or Taze me?

What gives the president the authority to declare an emergency and militarily force all people to comply with his rules?

Does it come from the people; in the form of the consent of the governed to be ruled by force?

Well, one might very well answer yes to this question after enduring a selective public education sponsored by that same government authority. But what if 49% of the people do not agree with that lawful authority? Must they really just grin and bear its tyranny, even if the corruption in that government is so blatant and scattered all over the news as to be a way of life instead of just random events?

Can the quorum of voices of the people through their “representatives” in Congress really force all of the people to comply with its will and law through the military rule of the Executive?

Does that really sound like a free country to you – where your liberties can be stripped away from you by the vote of the other people in a majority over you? Is that a republic?

If I were to challenge this perceived authority as an individual outside of that group-think mentality, I would need to challenge each office of government, starting from the lowest level of that government Beast. I would have to follow the chain of authority of all public officials, from police to police chiefs to Sheriffs to judges to councilmen to mayors to Governors to State legislators and senators… and finally I would be re-directed all the way up to the Federal level of the Legislative, Judicial, and Executive branches and Cabinets, and then finally to the man himself – the President of the United States. For each of these officials would indeed claim to answer to the authority of the one above themselves as the origin of their own perceived legal authority, but only after trying to convince me that as one of the “people” the president actually gets his power from me. And he will say this even when I outright declare him a criminal, smiling ear to ear in arrogance at my petulance while attempting to convince me that his authority is in fact the law of the people – of myself. I am apparently “the people”, though I have no voice…

But if finally I were to then challenge the authority of the President of the United States himself… to whom would he then point above him? Is it possible that there is a power higher than the President that he claims to receive his authority from? Of course, his public answer and claim of authority would be derived in full circle back to the fallacious lowest level of  the “consent of the governed” – the power of the people as a body politic of one, with only one voice – despite the 10’s or 100’s of millions who do not agree.

E Pluribus Unem – out of many, one.

So here is the true test of this word authority…

What happens when I challenge the authority of the people – of the body politic – as nothing but an authoritarian, indoctrinated mob led by government over myself and my natural rights with no clue that the people are harming themselves by their blind delegation of power to government?

What happens if I don’t agree that 51% of the people can vote to allow a corrupt government to take away my liberties, especially on known-to-be-rigged computer voting machines? And if government is based on the consent of all the people as one collective voice, what happens if one of those people no longer consents to being a part of that group-think model? What if one individual stands up and says no? Can a people really be free if any one of them are forced to obey a morally reprehensible law simply because the majority of people around them ignorantly acquiesce to granting government the authority to enforce that law? If government passes laws while in the same sentence exempting itself from its own laws, can we really call what we have in America today lawful, when the law is provably lawless?

So where can I possibly be directed to at this point to ask the people – after following this chain of mythical authority all the way to the top level of U.S. President and finally back to myself – where as part of a group of people without knowledge or comprehension I somehow authorize myself to be abused, mistreated, extorted from, stolen from, kidnapped, imprisoned, quarantined, and even killed?

Where, oh where does this authority come from?

Now that I know that the President’s power derives from myself, as one of the people, I still have the same question: Who or what gives authority to government? And for that matter, who or what gives authority to the people or to the Constitution of the United States?

I know what the answer is not, because it certainly is not me! And yet I am supposedly lumped in as a part of the people…?

It is with great horror that I must inform you that I have finally found the answer to these questions after many years of searching… and it isn’t good.

You see, we must realize that civil legal law and code – the law of men – is a law that cannot be enforced except with the use of violent force and duress. After all, what good is a Congress or a Judicial opinion if that opinion or law is not backed up by an army of security guards to force the people into accepting and obeying those laws and opinions?

So the first hard lesson we all need to comprehend is that any and all man-made law absolutely requires the force of law, either defensive or offensive. For voluntary taxes to be paid, punishments and consequences must be made to force payment of those voluntary taxes – for who would voluntarily pay for and support their own tyranny and enslavement unless forced or manipulated by govern-ment (mind control)?

Governments must make all things illegal before it can control the populace by issuing licenses to legally commit an illegal act.

And by punishing those who act without permission from government for even the most trivial of things, the authority of government is created through perceived fear. The government’s law must turn natural rights into political government granted rights (revokable privileges and benefits) in order to establish a true fascist society. And if you haven’t noticed lately, that is exactly what the federal United States government has done to America…

But still the question remains – why do 100’s of millions of people allow a few hundred congressional, judicial, and executive employees of the United States practice fascism right out in the open? Is the lack of knowledge and recognition of just what fascism is really that prevalent? Is ignorance really that blissful? Are meager benefits really worth the tyranny?

And still I must ask… Where does anyone’s authority to pass any law come from?

I have finally found the shocking answer, for all law throughout history has always been based upon a Higher Authority. In other words, God has always been the gnostic Authority of man’s law, from Cannon law to its modern perversion of ecclesiastical oppression. The question is, which god or derivative thereof was manifested in establishing the United States as a central federation of government through constitution?

The laws of the United States are codified into what is known as “U.S. CODE“. This includes the codification of the constitution of the United States.

I consulted Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, printed in 1856, for a definition of this word “code”:

CODE, legislation. Signifies in general a collection of laws. It is a name given by way of eminence to a collection of such laws made by the legislature.

This struck me as quite an odd use of language. Just what and where does this “eminence” hail from, and who exactly is granting it upon the holy U.S. Code of the United States government?

Of course, it then occurred to me that I had certainly heard government use this word before…

The 5th Amendment to the constitution – labeled as one of the “Bill of Rights” – clearly and unequivocally proclaims that your life, liberty, and property can be taken away by government with court order (due process). This is often referred to as the “Taking’s Clause“. It’s most common name though is eminent domain.

Eminent domain is a prime example of what a free country certainly is not! For if my life, my rights (liberties), and my property can simply be seized upon by a corrupt court’s opinion (the faith of the court) without my permission, in no way can any sane and rational man claim to live freely in the jurisdiction of the United States.

Bouvier’s goes on to define the words eminence and domain:

EMINENCE; A title of honor given to cardinals.

CARDINAL, ecclesiastical law. The title given to one of the highest dignitaries of the court (government) of Rome. Cardinals are next to the pope in dignity; he is elected by them and out of their body (body politic). There are cardinal bishops, cardinal priests, and cardinal deacons.

So like our president, the Pope is “elected” by cardinals (appointed representatives) who claim “eminence” (honor through title). So where does this eminence come from in the United States? And who bestowed this eminent authority upon the person who appointed these cardinals to the U.S. government? Do “the people” as a group know the will of God and somehow esoterically vote accordingly through a holy Vulcan mind meld? And if so, why do some people vote differently than other people?

DOMAIN. It signifies sometimes, dominion, territory governed – sometimes, possession, estate – and sometimes, land about the mansion house of a lord. By domain is also understood the right to dispose at our pleasure of what belongs to us. 2. A distinction, has been made between property and domain. The former (property) is said to be that quality which is conceived to be in the thing itself, considered as belonging to such or such person, exclusively of all others. By the latter (domain) is understood that right which the owner has of disposing of the thing. Hence domain and property are said to be correlative terms; the one is the active right (of the tenant) to dispose, the other (property is) a passive quality which follows the thing, and places it at the disposition of the owner.

DOMINION. The right of the owner of a thing to use it or dispose of it at his pleasure.

As tenants, citizens are not the owner of property registered with government. Property as a “passive quality” title is revokable through eminent domain by the true owner, which is government in Trust. So title of property is nothing but a positive (revokable) right (privilege) granted by government, which has dominion over your person and your property (artificial paper things and Titles).

But wait a minute! This legal definition of domain combined with the descriptive word “eminent” leads me to believe that the “Codes” passed by the legislature hold their authority directly from God Almighty… or some other god! And since when are titles of Nobility and Honor allowed in the United States against the constitution?

Oh, wait, I get it… the constitution itself is in fact a sacred set of articles granting the ultimate titles of sacred nobility!!!

Am I to understand that the representatives of the people – the congress and senate – are acting in the same capacity as Cardinals of the Catholic or other Church? Makes sense, considering that for many centuries the church has been the eminent government of most kingdoms.

When I asked a friend of his opinion on this concept,  he referred me to Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition, where I found another surprising legal definition that is actual case law:

EVIL. It is an evilwithin rule that either means or end of conspiracy must be evil, to frustrate or impede a government function, whether that function is performed under a constitutional or an unconstitutional law. U.S. v. Rhoads, D.C. D.C., 48 F.Supp. 175, 176.

So according to the opinion of the courts, it is evil to impede the government while it is acting unconstitutionally?

Why am I being arrested, officer?

You’ve committed illegal evil, sir.

Oh, yes then… carry on…

In other words, it is evil to interfere with the holy eminence of government when it claims dominion over your life, your children’s life, your liberty, and your property. I seem to recall that it is evil to frustrate or impede the church as it pretends to act under God as well, but then it claims to be government too.

Now, I suppose we all have different ideas of what constitutes the word evil, but this is ridiculous! After the initial shock of this court opinion and legal definition faded a bit for me, a cold realization subsumed my soul as I realized something very important. This is nothing if not a religious opinion of a religious judicial court based upon its own delusional religious eminence and sacra-ment.

I harkened back to years of research and remembered other confounding claims of property ownership by government, which now started to make perfect sense from a religious standpoint.

Here we see the concept of domain explained on a universal scale: government owns all property, and the people are allowed to be tenants of that property as mere users once registered as citizens. And this from the congressional record!

“The ultimate ownership of all property is in the State; individual so-called “ownership” is only by virtue of government, i.e. law, amounting to mere user; and user must be in accordance with law and subordinate to the necessities of the State.” Senate Document No. 43, 73D Congress, 1st Session, entitled: “Contracts Payable in Gold”, by George Cyrus Thorpe, submitted to the senate: April 17, 1933

“The money will be worth 100 cents on the dollar because it is backed by the credit of the Nation. It will represent a mortgage on all the homes and other property of all the people in the Nation.” –Congressman Patman, speaking from the Congressional Record of March 9, 1933, and referring to the Act of March 9, 1933.

If the United States has eminent domain over any and all property it claims, then the United States by default is technically the owner of all property in the United States (jurisdiction). In other words, it claims a dark eminence over the people and what they perceive as their personal property, but which is in fact the domain of the United States central government (a church and state). What else can one call this supposed authority of eminence over all things but righteous?

–=–
The Founding Fathers
Of The American Temple

–=–

The questions we will be answering today are: Where does this declared eminence hail from? Who or what were the founding fathers that claimed constitutional eminence over all “people”? How are the politicians of today related to those founding fathers? And from what Order of men did they then and now subscribe?

I considered for a long period the rather bold righteousness of these two congressional statements above… And that’s when it struck me – the Authority of government is not lawful in any way! It is not based on the consent of the people or upon the spirit of true justice. It is not even based on anything of or in this world. The horrifying truth is that the major governments of the world, including the United States, are claiming a uniform Authority from God… or from some other occult, godly, and etherical power unknown to most people.

But I didn’t fool myself anymore, for I knew then exactly which god it was.

I knew this almost immediately, because God’s law is the natural law. And everything the United States government does within its eminent “Code” is an attack upon that natural law and the natural rights of the people – the law of God and nature to do no harm to others or their property. U.S. Code is an absolute assault on the Ten Commandments and natural law, allowing government permission to kill, rape, pillage, and torture the enemies of its state within its eminent code. For nowadays, government hardly does anything else but harm its subjected people and eminently pronounce domain over all property and people in America, as well as the rest of the world through its military occupation and forced nation building – more commonly known as “spreading democracy”.

I understood then that my beliefs were absolutely irrelevant; my historical perspective dead wrong.

And I finally comprehended that day the truly dark nature of the Eminent Authority and Domain of this government and of that claimed by its founders. And so I went searching for the answers as to who or what their true higher Authority actually was…

–=–
The Tools Of Masonry And Law
–=–

Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856, lets us understand the deeper meaning of the words used in U.S. Codes and around the world, finding their origins in the ancient sacred geometry of Freemasonry:

RULE. This is a metaphorical expression borrowed from mechanics. The rule, in its proper and natural sense, is an instrument by means of which may be drawn from one point to another, the shortest possible line, which is called a straight line. 2. The rule is a means of comparison in the arts to judge whether the line be straight, as it serves in jurisprudence, to judge whether an action be just or unjust, it is just or right, when it agrees with the rule, which is the law. It is unjust and wrong, when it deviates from it. lt is the same with our will or our intention.

RULE OF LAW. Rules of law are general maxims, formed by the courts, who having observed what is common to many particular cases, announce this conformity by a maxim, which is called a rule; because in doubtful and unforeseen cases, it is a rule for their decision; it embraces particular cases within general principles…

–=–

In a million years I would never have guessed that the “Maxims” of law were based upon a metaphysical Masonic concept or tool of justice.

And so I looked to see how other words in this eminent legal system and language were based upon the tools of Masonry…

Of the most commonly used tools by a mason, one which does not get much attention, is the folding ruler. While the compass measures direction and the square measures angle, the rule is used to measure height and length. These modern day “rulers” used to be called a “story pole”, and in modern times have been replaced in practicality by the retracting steel measuring tape. Of course the necessity for a straight line, just as in ecclesiastical law, is paramount in masonry – the shortest distance between two points.

It is important to understand that the teachings of masonry are dualistic, using the tools of building and measurement as “metaphoric expressions” for the character of a man as a Freemason.

For example, the “Square” is one of the most important tools in Freemasonry. Besides being the first working tool in the Second Degree, it is also the Second Great Light.

The Plumb Rule is the emblem of integrity. The Plumb Rule consists of a weight hanging freely at the end of a line; the principle that actuates it is the influence of gravity. No matter where it is placed, it always points to the centre of the earth. So it is in the spiritual world, but here it points unerringly to God.

Note here that pointing downward to the center of the earth as opposed to pointing up to the heavens is represented as pointing to “God”. Perhaps I am mistaken, but rumor has it that something or someone else hangs out down there…

In the Third Degree, the Skirret is an implement which acts on a centre pin, whence a line is drawn to mark out the ground for the foundation of the intended structure. Symbolically, the Skirret points out that straight and undeviating line of conduct laid down for our pursuit in the Volume of the Sacred Law; and so to “square”, “level” and “upright” we must add “straight”. “Straight” is defined as the shortest distance between two points; and in our dealings with God, our neighbour and ourselves, we find that the shortest path is that which is straight. We can easily be tempted to take an easier path and so forsake the straight, perhaps at first just a little, but that “little” can become a habit. To keep on the straight requires restraint, which is rarely easy.

The Chisel is the last of the three working tools of the First Degree, and rightly so, because the Chisel should never leave our hand. As our ritual tells us: “the Chisel points out the advantages of education, by which means alone we are rendered fit members of every civilized society“. “Points out the advantages of education” — and is that not the whole theme of the Second Degree? There we are exhorted to extend our researches into the hidden mysteries of nature and science. “Science” in that use is the ancient word for knowledge, and education is the acquisition of knowledge, the way to which lies up the Winding Staircase. As the workman, with the aid of a chisel gives form and regularity to the shapeless mass of stone, so education by cultivating ideas and polishing rude thoughts transforms the ignorant savage into the civilised being.

The Chisel furthermore demonstrates the advantages of discipline. The mind like the diamond in its original state is unpolished, but by grinding away the external coat we are enabled to discover the latent beauty of the stone. Thus education discovers the latent beauties of the mind, and draws them forth to range over the field of matter and space in order to display the summit of human knowledge, our duty to God and man.

Why do judges use a gavel in their court proceedings?

The Gavel, we are told, represents the force of conscience, which, of course, is the voice of our own soul, or as our ritual puts it “the voice of nature” and the “centre from which we cannot err“. It is this inner voice that is ever ready to warn us when without it we would err. If we let conscience guide us, and are prompt to heed it, we will find its voice becoming stronger and clearer with every day of our lives; but, if we fail to heed it, failure becomes a habit, and its voice will eventually become so weak that it is barely audible, so that finally there is no warning at all and its owner becomes a really evil person.

Conscience, like the Gavel, will “knock off all superfluous knobs and excrescence’s” so that the rough stone of our character will become the Perfect Ashlar fit for the Temple.

–=–

“The Latin assis was a board or plank; in the diminutive form, assula, it meant a small board, like a shingle, or a chip. In this connection it is interesting to note that our “axle” and’ “axis” were derived from it. In early English this became asheler and was used to denote a stone in the rough as it came from the quarries. The Operative Masons called such a stone a “rough ashlar,” and when it had been shaped and finished for its place in the wall they called it a “perfect ashlar.” An Apprentice is a rough ashlar, because unfinished, whereas a Master Mason is a perfect ashlar, because he has been shaped for his place in the organization of the Craft.

– Source: 100 Words in Masonry

Rough and Perfect Ashlar
(Top) Crude Ashlar
(Bottom) Finished or Perfect Ashlar

–=–

The First Issue of the Builder
The Builder was published from 1915 to 1930 by
the National Masonic Research Society.
Nearly a century later, it has yet to be surpassed in terms of quality of content. 

–=–

Begin Excerpt from source:
“The Builder”, December 1916

Our lodge is in every respect a symbolic workshop, furnished with all the tools belonging to the different grades of workmen, and with a trestleboard upon which are set forth the day’s designs and the material upon which the labor of the brethren is to be expended.

This symbolic material consists of the two ashlars, emblematic of the crude material and the finished product, which are placed plainly enough on view in New York lodges, but absent or almost unknown except to students in many other states. The oblong stones and nondescript slabs sometimes seen are noteworthy evidence that the age-old significance of the “cubical stone,” which has played such a prominent role in the mythology and mysticism of the past, has almost run to oblivion in the modern craft. These stones should really be perfect cubes. The symbolism of the working tools is completely lost the moment such proportions are lost sight of or ignored. The ancient Hebrews had their own version of the great “number philosophy,” which lent sanctity and expressiveness to the number 12. First of all, it was the number of their Twelve Tribes, who were doubtless a symbolical enrollment of all the heads of families under the zodiacal sign of the month in which they were born. It is certainly significant that the patriarchal system was founded upon this number, and later on many other dispositions were made that showed a particular reverence for the Chaldean plan of the universe based upon 12 signs. As one cube possesses six sides each of which is a perfect square, a number of remarkable mathematical and geometrical symbolisms were established based upon the fact that all the numbers, from one to 12 added together produce 78. This number is also the sum of 3 times “26,” the numerical value of the “Great and Sacred Name of Jehovah” (JHVH).

As each cube possesses 12 edges, the combined number require a 24-inch rule to symbolize their total outline. The breaking into different mathematical combinations of this supreme number, each significant of some one of the great ruling phenomena of nature, was seen in the symbolism of the use of an operative Mason’s gavel in the dressing of building stones.

The grand old mystery name of our Creator, called the Tetragrammaton (Greek for “four-letter name”) had as its root the three letters J, H, and V, which as numbers were 10, 5, and 6, or 21, the sum of the added numbers 1 to 6 represented by a single cube.

This fact was made the basis of a curious legend, ought by the wise old rabbis into that marvelous compilation called the Talmud, from which more than a little of our Masonic material has been derived.

The story is of the Patriarch Enoch (Hanok, father Methuseleh), whose name means “the initiator,” 10, all accounts agree, lived 365 years, or a “year of years.” A remarkable book attributed to him is often alluded to by the Hebrew commentators and early Christian “Fathers”; but no trace of it was ever found until in the last century it turned up in Abyssinia. It has been translated out of that strange African dialect into many tongues. The so-called Book of Enoch contains a remarkable recital of astronomical science as known to the ancients, told entirely in allegorical form, while the history of the Children of Israel is prophesied ( ?) under the allegorical simile of the remarkable doings of a singularly intelligent flock of sheep which build a house for their shepherd, the whole reading very much like a children’s fairy tale.

The Talmudic legend of Enoch represents him as greatly disturbed at the news of the impending world Deluge,” for fear the Name of God should be lost. He accordingly caused it to be inscribed upon a triangular plate of gold, and affixed it to a cubical stone, for the safe keeping of which he caused a series of nine arched vaults to be constructed, one beneath another, at the foot of Mt. Moriah (the holy mountain of the Jews, as Mt. Meru was of the Hindus). The rains came and the flood descended, and so washed the mud and silt over the site that it became completely obliterated.

Centuries later, when King David was moved “to build an house unto the Lord,” and actually set his workmen to dig the foundations thereof, the latter discovered the vaults, and descending therein brought to light the long-buried stone.

Tradition also has it that the material of this stone was agate, which would at once connect it with the Hermetic philosophy; for agate, above all, was sacred to Hermes and Thoth or David. The latter, having been a warlike monarch, was not permitted to achieve that which he had begun and so bequeathed the cubical stone to his son Solomon, who made use of it as the cornerstone of the Temple.

The imagery of this is plain enough in the fact that, not in a written or engraved inscription, but in the mathematical proportions of the cube itself, was to be found that wonderful Name which is, as it were, the foundation of the universe, of which man is a fleshly epitome and the Temple on Mt. Moriah a symbolic one.

By knowing the use of the working tools of an E. A. the initiate might begin his labor of hewing and shaping the brute matter at his feet into stones fit for the builders’ use; but when he had accomplished his task he was apprised that the symmetry and order it represented in its finished shape was “God”: not a god whom he created, but a God whom his patient labor had revealed.

The cube itself was an age-old symbol of the spiritual Man, as set forth in the Mahabarata of ancient India:

A portion of Mine own Self, transformed in the world of life into an immortal Spirit, draweth round itself the senses of which the Mind, is the Sixth, veiled in Matter.

Therefore we find the cube present in all the ancient mythologies, which were but racial cloaks for one and the same wisdom religion, understood by the priests of all countries alike as a symbol of the sixth sign of the zodiac, the characters portraying the great Mother of Wisdom and her divine son Man.

It is the task of the apprentice to break through the shell of matter and liberate the Divine Word that dwells within by opening his own spiritual perceptions to the light of the Logos. As the priceless statues of Phidias and Praxiteles were once shapeless masses of unmeaning stone and the Parthenon a sea-worn crag, until gavel and gage, mallet and chisel, in the hand of inspiration had performed their tasks, so has always been the lesson of the cube in its unshapen and shapen forms to the apprentice Mason.

End Excerpt.

–=–

Something very important has been revealed here, which we will touch upon in more detail as we progress. We must comprehend that the ancient mystery religions, including all of the modern Christian, Judaism, and Islamic faiths, were derived from this Masonic “code” and that these mythologies as allegorical stories all originate from the same source. In other words, religion itself does not shape God, but instead shapes what men do with its teachings. They each control men depending upon that mans race, culture, and preconceived beliefs. And each religion is and was created based upon the integration of race and culture into “the same wisdom religion”.

This is extremely important, as we will see, in understanding the reasons for the next World War (3) and its purpose of pitting the people (races) of all nations against each other. For the true goal in the mysteries is to establish (phoenix rising) a one world religion out of the ashes of a religious war between these “racial cloaks” called religions. The Temple is being rebuilt upon the Mount, with the purpose of inciting world Islam against the now unholy alliance of Christians and the false Jews who claim the Kingdom of Jerusalem (Israel), which we call international Zionism.

As we look around the world and view the tainted media and its “news”, as well as the so-called “Christian” evangelism promoting Israel at all costs, we see the Islamic world spreading while the now Zionist governments of once racially exclusive nations like Sweden, Germany, France, and England become overrun with Muslim immigrants.

In these videos, we can see the plan shaping up and unfolding as the battlefield is being set for a holy religious war on an international scale, all centered around Jerusalem (Israel) and its holy Temple on the Mount recently reclaimed by the Masonic powers of the world after World War II.


“All the qualities of Catholicism…”
“No figures, no images… that’s the only line (difference).”

–=–

How else do you create a holy racial religious war than to purposefully intermingle such racial religious foes until one race and religion is forced to fight for its very culture, life, and land? And what happens when you discover that this has been the plan for a very long time – to allow the common-blood “goyim” races to simply and ignorantly wipe each other off the map in a trumped up holy war?

As required reading for full comprehension here, please view my History of World Governments and their incremental takeover by international Zionism, leading to the World Jewish Congress and the reclaiming of the Kingdom Of Israel for the Plantagenet bloodline kings – a war waged by Great Britain’s alliance with that Zionist congress.

Link–>https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2013/06/29/a-pictorial-history-of-the-worlds-governments/

It is of the utmost importance to comprehend that the white Ashkenazim “Jews” who now inhabit Palestine (Israel) in an illegal political “State” are not Semitic in any way – they are not the Biblical Jews. And yet they hide behind the historical notion of being the “lost tribes” of the “chosen people”, and now control the major governments of the world. But in truth, the leaders of nations and religions are all of the same blood, pretending to oppose one another while secretly and collectively striving for the same goal of rebuilding the Temple of Solomon and establishing a one world religion through the religious and racial war that action will create.

–=–
The Constitution Of A Debt

–=–

It is incredibly troubling to ponder the false paradigm of religious-like zeal that Americans exude towards the constitution of the United States. Like moths to a flame, this document of debt enslavement (charter) that created this corporation known as the United States attracts the hearts of people of every age, while their minds waste away viewing a high-definition revision of world history in books and on magic movie and television screens.

Ironically, it is this very document that forged (chartered) the slave colony called the USA; a Virginia Company, and part of the East India Company.

So again, we must remember exactly what a “constitution” actually is.

We must remember that freedom means to obey the laws of government, no mater how tyrannical.

And we must remember that the constitution creates political freedom, not the state of being free men in nature.

Bouvier’s again explains…

TO CONSTITUTE, contracts. To empower, to authorize. In the common form of letters of attorney, these words occur, I nominate, constitute and appoint.”

CONSTITUTION, contracts. The constitution of a contract, is the making of the contract as, the written constitution of a debt.

CONSTITUTOR, civil law. He who promised by a simple pact to pay the debt of another; and this is always a principal obligation.

EVIL. It is an “evilwithin ruleto frustrate or impede a government function, whether that function is performed under a constitutional or an unconstitutional law. U.S. v. Rhoads, D.C. D.C., 48 F.Supp. 175, 176. (From Black’s Law, above)

CONSTITUTION, government. The fundamental law of the state, containing the principles upon which the government is founded, and regulating the divisions of the sovereign powers, directing to what persons each of these powers is to be confided, and the, manner it is to be exercised as, the Constitution of the United States… The words constitution and government are sometimes employed to express the same idea, the manner in which sovereignty is exercised in each state. Constitution is also the name of the instrument containing the fundamental laws of the state. 3. By constitution, the civilians, and, from them, the common law writers, mean some particular law; as the constitutions of the emperors contained in the Code.

CODE, legislation. Signifies in general a collection of laws. It is a name given by way of eminence to a collection of such laws made by the legislature.

–=–

Now, we already know that the constitution continued the debt of the Congress into the new United States government. But what was that debt continued from?

Let’s read Article 12 of the Articles of Confederation:

Article XII. All bills of credit emitted, monies borrowed, and debts contracted by, or under the authority of congress, before the assembling of the united States, in pursuance of the present confederation, shall be deemed and considered as a charge against the United States, for payment and satisfaction whereof the said united States, and the public faith are hereby solemnly pledged.

Remember what faith is, and that you are pledged as surety for the full faith and credit of the nation.

And what is it to be pledged?

PLEGIIS ACQUIETANDIS, WRIT DE. The name of an ancient writ in the English law, which lies where a man becomes pledge or surety for another to pay a certain sum of money at a certain day; after the day, if the debtor does not pay the debt, and the surety be compelled to pay, he shall have this writ to compel the debtor to pay the same.

A man is a surety to his government assigned artificial person, and thus is a debtor to government. That debt can be forced from the surety via “due process” of government courts via similar code today. And again we see debtor prisons rising from the ashes…

PLEDGE, contracts. He who becomes security for another, and, in this sense, every one who becomes bail for another is a pledge.

PLEDGER. The same as pawner. (q. v.)

PLEDGEE. The same as pawnee. (q. v.)

PLEDGE or PAWN, contracts. These words seem indifferently used to convey the same idea… 3. Sir William Jones defines a pledge to be a bailment of goods by a debtor to his creditor, to be kept till the debt is dischargeda contract by which a debtor gives to his creditor a thing to detain as security for his debt. Lord Holt’s definition is, when goods or chattels are delivered to another as a pawn, to be security for money borrowed of him by the bailor – and this, he adds, is called in Latin vadium, and in English, a pawn or pledge. 4… according to Judge Story, it may be defined to be a bailment of personal property, as security for some debt or engagement… 5. The term pledge or pawn is confined to personal property; and where real or personal property is transferred by a conveyance of the title, as a security, it is commonly denominated a mortgage. 6. A mortgage of goods is, in the common law, distinguishable from a mere pawn. By a grant or a conveyance of goods in gage or mortgage, the whole legal title passes conditionally to the mortgagee; and if not redeemed at the time stipulated, the title becomes absolute at law, though equity will interfere to compel a redemption. But in a pledge a special property only passes to the pledges, the general property remaining in the pledger. A mortgage may be without possession, but a pledge cannot be without possession… 7. Things which are the subject of pledge or pawn are ordinarily goods and chattels; but money, negotiable instruments, actions, and indeed any other valuable thing of a personal nature, such as patent-rights and manuscripts, may, by the common law, be delivered in pledge. 8. It is of the essence of the contract, that there should be an actual delivery of the thing. 9. It is essential that the thing should be delivered as a security for some debt or engagement. –Bouvier’s, 1856

Black’s 4rth importantly adds:

Pledge… The necessary elements to constitute a contract one of “pledge” are: Possession of the pledged property must pass from the pledgor to the pledgee; the legal title to the property must remain in the pledgor; and the pledgee must have a lien on the property for the payment of a debt or the performance of an obligation due him by the pledgor or some other person-while, in a “chattel mortgage,” the legal title passes to the mortgagee subject to a defeasance… A bailment of personal property as security for a debt or other obligation. The specific article delivered to the creditor in security is also called a “pledge” or “pawn.”

So specifically, the Articles of Confederation were delivered to Great Britain and France as a pledge or pawn of America and its colonies, its current and future titled land as territories, its property, and its people as surety for debt.

The subsequent formation of the new United States was for all intents and purposes a “bailout” of the bankrupt congress of the Confederacy, conveying the debt of those Masons over to the new constituted corporation called United States.

–=–
The Masonic Hand
That Governs And Enforces

–=–

In retrospect, it is unfair of me to merely criticize an entire population who, like myself, grew up in government indoctrination centers called public schools. Like most parents, mine believed it was their duty to send me to a government school, and that it was my duty to pledge my allegiance to that government. I was fooled equally as well as everyone else; becoming part of the amorphous mass of brainwashed human commodities trained to be work-ready by age 18 with my hand on my heart, worshiping the corporate flag of that holy corporate district called United States.

But then in my late 20’s, as buildings were falling in New York City and military men were blocking the streets; as the world was morphing before my very eyes despite anything the constitution may or may not say – I actually read the constitution seemingly for the first time…

Over and over I poured through its legal language, defining its words, shocked at its blatant amendments, and confounded by its true history. And with the comprehension of every new Article and Amendment my belief turned to horror; the realization that I was part of something more sinister than I could ever have imagined. I realized that this corporation was literally killing in my name; with my permission –  in the name of “the people”. For every crime that the United States commits is done so with its presumed consent of the people it represents… one nation that is certainly not under God.

And today,  having just turned 41 this month, I have the dubious duty to report my findings on this holiest of fallacies called the United States constitution.


World peace through law???
Law = military police force, for law holds no power without force.
Force = Peace
Force = Liberty
Force= Freedom
Force = Law

–=–

So let’s talk about just who or what this trademarked
and supposed “global force for good” actually is.

https://i1.wp.com/lualualei1959.com/poster.jpg

https://i1.wp.com/gregmaxey.mvps.org/images/americas_navy.jpg
Notice the Trademark symbol for this military corporation?
How does the Government define a trademark?
“A trademark is a brand name.

https://i2.wp.com/blackagendareport.com/sites/www.blackagendareport.com/files/imagecache/feature400/us_war_crimes.jpg
Care and Compasion Hand Delivered?
Which picture is real, and which is print media propaganda?

https://i1.wp.com/www.talentzoo.com/flack-me/images/blog_images_article/4e2e2e1e1bb18.png
Corporate recruiting…


A military needs public affairs for its commercial activities and advertising.
And somehow it has salvaged its completely corrupt and tainted reputation
among the American people who unwittingly support it through debt and tacit consent.

But is there more to the military and its “Authority” than we’ve imagined?

https://i2.wp.com/www.c-e.com/.imaging/stk/ce/extras/dms/ce/img/opener/Navy_NV/NV_09_Print_UltimatePledge_960x1260/document/NV_09_Print_UltimatePledge_960x1260.jpg

Allegiance to…

http://i.ebayimg.com/t/MARINE-CORPS-MILITARY-MASONIC-MASON-STAINLESS-STEEL-SILVER-RING-ALL-SIZES-/00/s/MTc5WDI1MQ==/$(KGrHqVHJDME63ZMWGmEBO2YpW!,ow~~60_35.JPG

https://i0.wp.com/www.freemasonoutlet.com/media/catalog/product/cache/1/image/9df78eab33525d08d6e5fb8d27136e95/T/E/TE2MA-KL.jpghttps://i0.wp.com/thumbs4.ebaystatic.com/d/l225/m/mHWocm8GojsBySwh3JNvPGg.jpg


Clark Gable and Douglas Fairbanks – Masonic Brothers, Lodge #528, Beverly Hills


Gene Autry – 33rd Degree Mason, life Member Lodge # 185, Long Beach


Charles A. Lindbergh, Master Mason


Joe M. Jackson, Masonic Lodge #68

And what about the Commander in Chief?

Commander In Chief of the U.S. Military Barack Obama with his Masonic ring…


The Masonic handshake.


–=–

When considering the masses of enlisted soldiers in the military, we must apply the same logic and reason as we do to common members of churches and citizens under governments. Obviously, a kid straight out of high school will not be privy to the sacred secrets and mysteries held by the Masonic Generals of that Army. So it would be foolish again to compare the useful idiots (useful innocents) in the military, that would obey orders to attack their own people on command, to that of the leadership and government of the military. And of course the same holy and sacred oath apparently gives authority to those leaders and allows unquestioning soldiers to die and kill in the name of some deistic god and nation.

The profits from war, occupation, and conquest are a multitude and come in many forms. No one can dare declare this to be a false statement with a straight face. It controls the common-blood population and brings booty into the government’s sacred coffers. But we never seem to consider that the for-profit model of war is literally a corporate business of the Untied States, under the command of the Commander in Chief of that corporation.

Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition, defines the Army as:

ARMY. The armed forces of a nation intended for military service on land. An “army” is a body of men whose business is war. While the “militia” is a body of men composed of citizens occupied temporarily in the pursuit of civil life, but organized by discipline and drill, and called into the field for temporary military service when the exigencies of the country require it.

REGULAR ARMY. The permanent military establishment, which is maintained both in peace and war according to law.

There are two very important distinctions here; one between the nation and the countries within, and the other between the militia and a regular army (business). In fact, one of the chief complaints against the King within the Declaration of Independence was that:

“He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.”

And yet in stark contradiction, the constitution in Article 1, Section 8 gives the United States Legislature (Congress) the Power:

“To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years…”

“To provide and maintain a Navy…”

“To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Force…”

Of course, this deceptive language is similar to the language used for national emergencies. Like those, the “Appropriation of Money” is legislated every two years in congress in its appropriations bills – the funding of military rule and foreign and domestic occupation with public moneys out of the public debt or “God Trust”. So while the constitution states a seeming restriction, it also states how to simply work around that restriction in congress.

A standing army is just fine as long as congress consents to and supports it?

The “Federal Farmer” wrote a series of letters published in the Poughkeepsie County Journal in late 1787 and early 1788, where he predicted that under the new Constitution:

“(Congress) will have unlimited power to raise armies, and to engage officers and men for any number of years.”

“I see so many men in America fond of a standing army, and especially among those who probably will have a large share in administering the federal system; it is very evident to me, that we shall have a large standing army as soon as the monies to support them can be possibly found. An army is not a very agreeable place of employment for the young gentlemen of many families.”

“…we all agree, that a large standing army has a strong tendency to depress and inslave (enslave) the people.”

–=–

So why is it that in the American states we had individual state militias, whereas in the nation we have a standing army as a business? Just what is the difference between these two words that we so commonly intermingle without care or concern?

COUNTRY. By country is meant the state of which one is a member. 2. Every man’s country is in general the state in which he happens to have been born, though there are some exceptions. See Domicil; Inhabitant. But a man has the natural right to expatriate himself, i. e. to abandon his country, or his right of citizenship acquired by means of naturalization in any country in which he may have taken up his residence.

Ah, so a man in a country is still considered under the natural law; not being forced to submit to that government.

So what the is a nation, and why is it so important to get men to enter into the jurisdiction of the nation despite being perfectly comfortable in his or her country (state)?

NATIONS. Nations or states are independent bodies politic; societies of men united together for the purpose of promoting their mutual safety and advantage by the joint efforts of their combined strength. 2. But every combination of men who govern themselves, independently of all others, will not be considered a nation; a body of pirates, for example, who govern themselves, are not a nation. To constitute a nation another ingredient is required. The body thus formed must respect other nations in general, and each of their members in particular. Such a society has her affairs and her interests; she deliberates and takes resolutions in common; thus becoming a moral person who possesses an understanding and will peculiar to herself, and is susceptible of obligations and rights. 3. It belongs to the government to declare whether they will consider a colony which has thrown off the yoke of the mother country as an independent state; and until the government have decided on the question, courts of justice are bound to consider the ancient state of things as remaining unchanged.

NATIONALITY. The state (disposition) of a person in relation to the nation in which he was born. 2. A man retains his nationality of origin during his minority, but, as in the case of his domicil of origin, he may change his nationality upon attaining full age; he cannot, however, renounce his allegiance without permission of the government. See Citizen; Domicil; Expatriation; Naturalization…

NATIVES. All persons born within the jurisdiction of the United States, are considered as natives.

Are you a native of the United States? Do you think this legal status was a choice? It means that you were born in a state (country) and are a citizen (artificial person) of the United States (the nation).

Confused?

These words are not interchangeable. In America, there are 50 countries that are members of the nation called the United States.

The United States is not a country, it is a nation.

California is not a nation, it is a country (state).

The 50 “states” of America are all individual countries bound to the nation of the United States under military force of its “spiritual jurisdiction”.

The name United States is very confusing, for it is not representative of the true nature of the countries within. The United States is nothing but the name of the corporation of a district. I could call myself “Dog” as my official name, but that doesn’t make me an actual dog. I am man. Just because the nation calls itself “United States”, that does not mean that it is a country. For the nation is a series of countries that under contract make up the body politic of that nation. The name of the government of that conglomeration of states is the “United States”.

In its simplest terms, a nation is nothing but a “jurisdiction”. It’s sort of like a masonic club, where you can check in but you can’t check out. The civil war is evidence of this fact, supported by the Lieber Code and the United States military occupation of each country (state) of its nation today. Just as a nation’s members are countries (or “states” as artificial corporations), so too are the persons who are citizens of the nation – members of the club. To claim to be a natural-born citizen of the United States means that you were born in a country (state) and are a contracted artificial person corporation of the United States jurisdiction. You are like a Starbuck’s, and there’s one of you on every corner. You see, a natural born man cannot him or herself be an artificial person. For this, the United States corporation (district) created the “14th amendment citizen” and requires you (the man) to be surety for that artificial person in order to be legally called a “citizen” – to be considered a thing instead of a living man – to be a chattel commodity instead of a sentient being.

A citizen is nothing but a piece of paper, assigned a number, and filed away in a cabinet.

But most relevant to this topic is the difference between the militias of the individual countries (states) as compared to the standing army of the nation. For the last thing that the occupying military force of the United States (nation) would desire is for the individual countries (states) to have their own military power to stand in protection of the county (state) against the Masonic United States (nation/jurisdiction). The purpose of minimizing and diminishing the State militias was to create a central army that would occupy and “keep the peace” in each country (state) in order to ensure the military rule of the nation over the countries (states).

In essence, the ability of each state to protect itself from the jurisdiction (rule) of the sovereign (ruler) has been conquered and eradicated by simply destroying the organization of the people of each country (state) as their own military force. The last thing a bully wants is for his victims to fight back.

And this is the forced contractual nature of the word “united” – a nation of tyranny over countries (states).

E Pluribus Unum – out of many (countries), one (nation)…

…Under God???

–=–
The Masonic Charter Of Freedom:
Constituting The United States
–=–

“Independence Hall in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA has many, many Masonic Connections. It stands on land purchased by Wm. Allen, Grand Master of PA. The ground was staked by Edmond Wolley, a Mason. Thomas Boude, the brick mason, was the first Secretary of St. John’s Lodge of Philadelphia and later Deputy Grand Master. Benjamin Franklin laid the cornerstone while Grand Master (1734) with the assistance of St John’s Lodge. Brother Andrew McNair of Philadelphia rang the bell to call the populace on July 8, 1776, to hear the reading of the Declaration of Independence. The Liberty Bell cracked in 1835 when it tolled the death of Chief Justice John Marshall, past Grand Master of Virginia.”

–Missouri Lodge of Research, “Did You Know?”, Wes Cook publisher, 1965

–=–

The comprehension that our most cherished of declarations and the corporate charter called the constitution are a fraud is very much like losing one’s faith in the religious doctrine that controls the minds of good Christians, turning them away from God and natural law. The cult of patriotism that has sprung forth from this particular religion of national constitutionalism is one that I believe must come to an end… yet another pledge of allegiance without comprehension of its consequences. For the constitution is the basis for all fairy tales and faith in and of what would otherwise be a free land and country, and it represents the very foundation of power and tyranny by the corporation for which it chartered. It grants no rights to men, for it only applies to government and artificial corporate persons. It gives no true recourse for the grievances of men, for the courts are government owned. It perverts the natural state of man and binds us in contractual chains of artificial person-hood and obligation. And it offers nothing but debt and subjection to its believers who voluntarily and falsely embrace it as God-given.

The constitution is nothing more than the foundation and Masonic cornerstone of a cult, and its leaders are steering its followers into destitution and despotism…. and world war.

This is done by continuously using the promise of freedom – a word very few common men understand. For in true Orwellian double-speak, the Freedom that is prescribed “eminently” by the constitution is not what we believe it to be. As I will show further into this essay, freedom actually means tyranny. And ironically, the more tyranny that citizens have forced upon them, the more freedom they enjoy. If you are intrigued and skeptical by this statement, it will all make sense later…

For those brave enough to challenge their own belief system by reading and considering what is written below, I would absolutely invite you to ardently attempt to challenge the following information without patriotic dogma (religious belief). I would invite you to suspend your belief and realize your self; stepping outside of the group-think model you’ve been trained to accept and into the world of individual thought, reason, and unbiased logic. And for God’s sake, literally… search your soul. For if this constitution is truly what you believe it to be, surely you can disprove what I am about to reveal. I wholeheartedly encourage you to attempt to do so.

But first you must read…

Before we can examine the rhetoric of this constitution, we must first understand who the Authors of this “Charter For Freedom” were and why they chose to grammatically pen the constitution as they did. This documented history will be followed (in Part 3) by a step by step examination of each myth and fallacy surrounding the constitution and its verbiage. Now, we will expound upon the actual language and define the words written within this debt compact.

Let’s begin…

–=–

“We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union,
establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense,
promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty
to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this
Constitution for the United States of America.”

–U.S. Constitution

–=–

ORDAIN.
(Black’s 4rth)
To institute or establish; to make an
ordinance; to enact a constitution or law.
To confer on a person the holy orders of priest or deacon.

ORDINATION.
(Black’s 4rth)
Ceremony by which a bishop confers on a person
the privileges and powers necessary for the execution
of sacerdotal (priestly) functions in the church.

ORDINATION.
(Bouvier’s 1856)
Civil and ecclesiastical law.
The act of conferring the orders of the church upon an individual*.

***Individual means a single artificial person

ORDINUM FUGITIVI.
(Black’s 4rth)
In old English law. Those of the religious who deserted their houses,
and, throwing off the habits, renounced their particular
order in contempt of their oath and other obligations.

–=–

Ever wondered why certain words are capitalized in the constitution? People, Order, Union, Welfare…?

It would seem that this was just some random quirk by the author in his penmanship, until we take a closer look at those capitalized words.

Let’s take for example this phrase “in Order”, which takes upon itself a very different meaning than the phrase “in order” – where the word order is not capitalized as it is in the Constitution.

Since the constitution was written as: “We the People, in Order to form a more perfect Union… do ordain and establish this Constitution…”, we have grammatically and in meaning a very different legal document than what might otherwise be – one issued and ordained by a specific “Order” of men as a small society of specific “People” with a certain self-granted ecclesiastical status of eminence and domain, who thus signed this Constitution in an Order as the only People. But who or what exactly gave them the eminent power and authority to do this?

***Note: We will be using the “Masonic” edition of the Holy Bible throughout this discourse to help in our comprehensions.

It is stated, according to the Masonic “Holy Bible Red Letter Edition – Masonic Edition Cyclopedic Indexed King James Bible”, published by the John A. Hertzel Co. Chicago (1942), that:

George Washington the founder of this country was the first Grand Master of Masons’ of this commonwealth compromising the thirteen original States of this Land of Liberty founded on the principles of Brotherly Love, Faith, Hope and Charity, the vital breath of which is “Individual Liberty” and an equal opportunity to all of its citizens. Of the twenty-nine Major Generals in Washington’s army twenty four were Master Masons, of the thirty seven Brigadiers, thirty seven were Master Masons, proving that this “Land of Liberty” was founded by Master Masons. Now as then, masonry’s challenge is the Holy Bible, its teachings from the center to circumference symbols of the everlasting. “The Washington Monument is built of stone contributed by all the nations of the earth to honor the founder of this republic. From Arlington it looks like a giant spike which God had driven, saying ‘Here I stake a claim for the home of Liberty’.” L. J.

Did you notice some of the same grammatical capitalization processes here as were written into the constitution in that City of Brotherly Love?

On the same opening page, it states:

Of fifty-six signers of the Declaration of Independence, fifty-three were Master Masons.”

So just who was this man, George Washington?

This statue of Washington donning a Masonic Apron
stands in the New york Grand Masonic Hall


Washington’s Masonic Apron is displayed here in a Masonic Lodge,
and is considered “The most prized possession of American Masons”


The Crude Ashlar and the Finished or Perfect Ashlar stones


George Washington laying the Masonic Cornerstone of United States Capital building.
It was Freemason Benjamin Franklin who laid the cornerstone for Independence Hall.


–=–
“Of fifty-six signers of the Declaration of Independence, fifty-three were Master Masons.”
–=–

From this sourced statement and pictures there should be little doubt in anyone’s mind that the masterminds behind the United States were indeed of the Masonic Order. And as we view the writing style of this Masonic Holy Bible, we can see the same unique capitalization standards as are applied in the language of the constitution.

The question is… What exactly does this capitalized word “Order” mean as it applies to the constitution, and who were the “People” in this “Order”?

The greatest problem in translation is that most people consider these words that were capitalized as merely conversational words. They are not. They are specific legal terms and proper nouns. They are specific concepts and things. And they must be defined as such when comprehending the meaning of this constitution and these purposefully capitalized nouns. In any contract, the subject of that contract is written with capitalization. When this Masonic tool of language is applied, the constitution suddenly takes on a whole new meaning.

Let’s first have a look at just what the definitions of some of these words are as both conversational words compared to their usage as legal and proper nouns.

Here is the Webster’s Dictionary definition for the word order, which specifically makes the distinction between the verb and the proper Noun:
–=–

1or·der

verb \ˈȯr-dər\

Definition of ORDER

transitive verb
1: to put in order : arrange
2a : to give an order to : command
2b : destine, ordain <so ordered by the gods>
2c : to command to go or come to a specified place <ordered back to the base>
2d : to give an order for <order a meal>
intransitive verb
1 : to bring about order : regulate
2a : to issue orders : command
2b : to give or place an order

2order

noun (and proper noun)

Definition of ORDER

1a : a group of people united in a formal way: as (1) : a fraternal society <the Masonic Order> (2) : a community under a religious rule; especially : one requiring members to take solemn vows
1b : a badge or medal of such a society; also : a military decoration
2a : any of the several grades of the Christian ministry
2b plural : the office of a person in the Christian ministry
2c plural : ordination
3a : a rank, class, or special group in a community or society
3b : a class of persons or things grouped according to quality, value, or natural characteristics: as (1) : a category of taxonomic classification ranking above the family and below the class (2) : the broadest category in soil classification
4a (1) : rank, level <a statesman of the first order> (2) : category, class <in emergencies of this order — R. B. Westerfield>
6a : a prescribed form of a religious service: rite
10a : a written direction to pay money to someone

–=–

All of these words have previously been defined in this essay. The sacramentum or solemn vow, the religious custom of rite, a constitution as a written direction to pay money or be obligated to someone or something…

But first and foremost we must notice the difference in capitalization here for these definitions. For while the verb and noun are not capitalized, the specific noun form of the word Order is proper and therefore necessarily is capitalized. This was no semantic whim on the part of these Masonic architects of the constitution. These words were specifically given as proper Persons, Places, or Things (proper nouns) as opposed to the use of the general or conversational meaning of these words. Even within Webster’s Dictionary, the example used to describe the proper capitalized form of the noun Order is specifically the “Masonic Order” as we see above, which is purposefully capitalized to refer to a specific entity; a group of specific People in a specific Order.

Most importantly, this word specifically signifies a society of men with self-proclaimed eminence and authority as a religious (ecclesiastical) rite as opposed to all common people in general. And when we read this sentence again, it is quite difficult to translate it in any other way.

“We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

Here is what it would say without the pomp and circumstance of false patriotism to fool the average reader (all the other people):

“We the People of the United States, in Order… do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

But let’s not be hasty… Are there any other societies of law and order that we may see Masonic proper noun terms used like Liberty, Justice, Union, Tranquility, Blessings, and Welfare, etc?

When a court comes to Order, it is coming to order in the Order of the society of the American Bar Association under the United States’ jurisdiction of the Department of Justice. When a public council meeting comes to order, it is coming to Order with the specific People on that Council under eminent domain of its citizens. And who calls the Court to Order? The Marshal or Sheriff (Bailiff).

But is there something we don’t know about the State Marshal and County Sheriffs?


Crescent and star?
Star of David?
The Seals of Solomon…?

http://o4.aolcdn.com/dims-shared/dims3/PATCH/resize/400x268/http://hss-prod.hss.aol.com/hss/storage/patch/d30e338fa3700f90435a84092704f744
Hey… what’s that ‘G’ in a square and compass doing on that patch?


Hey, why is the international symbol of fascism on that patch?


Fascio (plural fasci)- A bundle of wood wrapped with an axe…
The ancient international symbol of fascism!

File:National Guard Bureau (insignia).svgFile:US-Courts-AdministrativeOffice-Seal.svg
Left: National Guard emblem with crossed fasci – Right: seal of U.S. Courts with fascio

File:Lincoln Memorial Inside.jpg
Lincoln Memorial with Fasci on throne


Lincoln Memorial

File:George Washington Statue at Federal Hall.JPG
George Washington statues with veiled Fasci
Federal Hall, New York City

File:Seal of the United States Senate.svgFile:Mercury dime reverse.jpg
Left: Seal of the United States Senate with crossed Fasci
Right: U.S. “Mercury” Dime with fascio

https://i2.wp.com/americanbuilt.us/images/war-criminals/Congress-2-fasci.jpg

https://i0.wp.com/photos1.meetupstatic.com/photos/event/b/2/c/c/600_119985772.jpeg
The International symbol of Fascism hangs prevalently in the Halls of Congress
And what is that over on the left…?
A Scepter?
A Mace?

The God Trust


Speaker of the House James Beauchamp “Champ” Clark standing at the rostrum
in the House of Representatives chamber by Fascio, United States Capitol,
Washington, D.C. (between 1910 and 1915)

–=–

But why are these Roman Fasci hanging in the halls of congress and adorning so many monuments?

Well, we can always get the propaganda tour from the governments Office of the Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives:


Did you notice the art was framed in wooden fasci?


Yes… surrounding Washington are the fasci and the Greek gods, what of it slave?

–=–

And, from the official U.S. Govt. website of the “Office of the Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives”, we get this official explanation:

The Bronze Fasces

“The bronze fasces, representing a classical Roman symbol of civic authority, are located on both sides of the U.S. flag. The original Roman fasces consisted of an axe within a bundle of rods, bound together by a red strap. The fasces were carried before the consul and were used to restore order and carry out punishment of the courts. The U.S. adopted the fasces as a symbol of the authority of Congress in part due to their symbolic relationship with Republican Rome, which the founding fathers consciously referenced in the formation of the United States.”

–=–

The Mace

“The mace, a decorative variation of the fasces, is placed by the Sergeant at Arms on a pedestal at the Speaker’s right each time the House convenes. The mace is moved to the lower pedestal of the Speaker’s rostrum when the House is called into the Committee of the Whole on the state of the Union or for the consideration of legislation.

This mace has been in use in the House since 1841 when the Members met in the old House Chamber, and was crafted by William Adams, a New York silversmith. The original House mace was destroyed when the British burned the Capitol in 1814. During the intervening years, a wooden mace was used.

To restore order in the Chamber the Speaker may direct the Sergeant at Arms to take the mace from its pedestal and present it before an unruly Member.

The mace is 46 inches high, made of 13 thin ebony rods. The rods are bound together by the four crossing silver bands, which are pinned together and held at the top and bottom of the shaft by silver bands. The bands are decorated with a raised floral border. The inscription “Wm. Adams/Manufacturer/New York/1841” is engraved in a cartouche in the center front of the bottom band.

A silver globe with an eagle perched on it sits at the top of the mace. The globe is 4½ inches in diameter and engraved with the seven continents, the names of the oceans, lines of longitude, and major lines of latitude. The Western Hemisphere faces the front. The globe is encircled with a silver band marked with the degrees of latitude, on which the engraved, solid silver eagle with a 15-inch wingspan rests.”

–=–


Mace of the U.S. Congress with 13 Ebony Rods

Fascio and Mace Combined in U.S. Congress Chambers

Roman Centurion and Fascio engraved upon the U.S. Supreme Court.
The scourging rods of these Fasci were said to be used on Jesus
in torture and punishment before His crucifixion!

–=–

Now then, where could the symbolic use of the sacred Fasci Mace have come from?

Image

Crest of ZBT = Zeta Beta Tau
Including:
– Brotherly (Masonic) Handshake
– (Aladdin’s) Lamp
– Scales of “Justice”
– The Fasci
-Skull and Bones…
– Solomon’s Seal (Star of David)

“Zeta Beta Tau (ZBT) was founded in 1898 as the nation’s first Jewish fraternity.
No longer sectarian, all men of good character who believe in ZBT’s mission
and values are eligible for membership in Zeta Beta Tau. Today the merged
Zeta Beta Tau Brotherhood is one of the largest, numbering over
140,000 initiated Brothers, and over 90 chapter locations.

The Zeta Beta Tau fraternity was inspired by Dr. Richard J. H. Gottheil,
a professor of languages at Columbia University and a Zionist.
On December 29, 1898, he formed a Zionist youth society with
a group of students from several New York City universities.


Rush week… Join ZBT now!

For the Masonic Knights Templar, the skull and bones symbolize Golgotha –
the place of Jesus’ crucifixion. It is also used to symbolize a dire warning
against betraying the group’s secrets and/or failing to keep one’s oath.


Original Edomite “Mace” Circa 650 B.C.
Notice the Horns of the “Devil”.

Edomite-Roman Gold Coin – “Lictors” Bearing Fasces
Edomite Warrior Chiefs With Their Mace of Power

Royal Mace of the British Parliament

–=–

So where else can we find this fascist Roman symbol of authority and the “right” (rite) to punish “sin” and “evil” in the United States’ spiritual jurisdiction?

Look a bit closer…


The dome upon the United States Capital building in
Washington D.C. is adorned with multiple symbols of fascism


Jefferson County Courthouse (1929), downtown Birmingham, Alabama.


Chicago City Hall with Fascio over doorway


Boston Federal Building

https://i2.wp.com/imperonet.altervista.org/partiti/pfc.jpg

–=–

The first General Assembly of the State of Colorado approved the adoption of the state seal on March 15, 1877. The Colorado Secretary of State alone is authorized to affix the Great Seal of Colorado to any document whatsoever. By statute, the seal of the State is two and one-half inches in diameter with the following devices inscribed thereon: At the top is the Eye of Providence or ‘All Seeing Eye’ within a triangle, from which golden rays radiate on two sides. Below the eye is a scroll, the Roman fasces, a bundle of birch or elm rods with a battle ax bound together by red thongs and bearing on a band of red, white and blue, the word, “Union and Constitution.”… Below the shield in a semicircle is the motto, “Nil Sine Numine”, Latin words meaning “nothing without the Deity”, and at the bottom the figures 1876, the year Colorado came into statehood.

–=–


Cleveland Public Library


U.S. Army and Air Force National Guard emblem with crossed Fasci

https://i2.wp.com/www.militaryuniformsupply.com/files/42nd-military-police-mulitcam-patch.JPG
42nd MP Brigade (Military Police) patch


US Army Military Police Corps Regimental Insignia
United States Army Institute of Heraldry
Approved July 3rd, 1986

https://i0.wp.com/skreened.com/render-product/i/a/h/iahabsetoysqockowyla/image.w174h200f3.jpg

File:Knights of Columbus color enhanced vector kam.svg
Emblem of the Masonic Knights Of Columbus

https://i0.wp.com/thumbs2.ebaystatic.com/d/l225/m/m5FkPUe7KHJxe9yRcaoeP_g.jpg
New York Deputy Inspector badge with crossed Fasci on Shield

20130303-133305.jpg
CCTV fittingly perched over a fascio


An early Roman coin with Caesar’s head and symbols
representing things the coin could be spent upon…
1. ears of corn (food and lodging)
2. Fasce (payments of Roman tax levies) and
3. Caduceus – (payment for medical treatments)


In Roman occupied countries such as Judea in 33 A.D.,
Roman capital punishment execution squads were always
preceded by two official “Lictors” bearing the two “Fasces”.

File:Fasci.jpg
Alexander Garden fence, Moscow Kremlin

File:Armoiries république française.svg
National emblem of France


France Civic Heraldry
Liberty, Equality, Fraternity (Brotherhood)


A modern French Passport with Fascio

–=–
A Tour Of Italy
–=–

File:Italy greater COA 1929.png
Great Coat Of Arms of Italy during Fascist era from1929 to 1943.
This was displayed during the rule of the National Fascist Party.

https://i1.wp.com/www.crwflags.com/fotw/images/i/it-isr.gif
Flag of the Repubblica Sociale Italiana,
during Mussolini’s reign.

https://i1.wp.com/www.crwflags.com/fotw/images/i/it-musso.gif
Mussolini’s personal flag

image
dell’Arco della Vittoria di Bolzano

image

image
Liceo Scientifico a Bergamo (College)

image

imageimage


Italian Military Uniform Fasci pins

image
Fasci in front of obelisk

dsc0510ez
Acquedotto consorziale, Marano Principato Cs.

hpim0113x

dscf0226dy
Palazo Ducezio, Sicilia
Note the Lions head – representing the Tribe of Judah

dscn5188yimage
Left: una Statua dello Stadio dei Marmi

image
sui Mosaici del Foro Italico

(Wikipedia excerpt)

Chamber of Fasci and Corporations (Italian: Camera dei Fasci e delle Corporazioni) was the official name of the Italian Chamber of Deputies established on January 19, 1939, to replace the Chamber of Deputies during the 30th legislature of Italy. The Chamber was vested with legislative power from March 23, 1939 to August 2, 1943, during the height of the regime of Benito Mussolini’s National Fascist Party. Members of the chamber were called ‘”national councilors” (consiglieri nazionali) rather than deputies. The councilors of the chamber did not represent geographical constituencies, but the different branches of the trade and industry of Italy, thus reflecting the corporativist idea of fascist ideology.

Councilors were elected for terms of undetermined length and automatically lost their seats upon their defection from the branch they did represent. Renewal of the legislature was ordered by decree by the King of Italy, on specific instruction of the head of government (Mussolini).

Appointment

No elections took place in Italy between 1934 and 1946. The new founded Chamber of the Fascists and the Corporations replaced the Chamber of Deputies of Italy during the spring of 1939, with the legislative body coming into effect on March 23, 1939, as the 30th legislature of the Kingdom of Italy. Unlike earlier elections for the legislature held under the Fascist era, popular suffrage was not put into effect. Instead, candidates were simply delivered under the pretext of a parliamentary reform, replacing the elections system with a body comprising only candidates of the various corporations of Italy, fulfilling Benito Mussolini’s vow of enacting a complete corporativist system.

(End excerpt)

If one reads this with awareness, one quickly realizes that the United States is a corporativist nation. Though different in structure, no one can doubt that corporations are the power structure and lobbying force behind our representatives. The big picture reveals that the U.S. government is a major investor/stock owner of all major corporations around the world, making this true ideal and requirement of fascism (government owning corporations) a transparent reality.

How many politicians go on to be board of directors and CEO’s of the very corporations they once regulated in government?

–=–

File:Palazzo Montecitorio Rom 2009.jpg
Palazzo Montecitorio, seat of the Chamber of Fasci and Corporations.
Today this is the office of the Chamber of Deputies of Italy

The symbols of fascism obviously remain…


Ecuador state flag with fasci

File:Coat of arms of canton of St. Gallen.svg
Coat of arms of the Swiss canton of St. Gallen since 1803

https://i1.wp.com/goldcoastcollectables.com.au/wp-content/uploads/wpsc/product_images/20110217_4.JPGhttps://i2.wp.com/img3.etsystatic.com/008/0/5657783/il_fullxfull.387171719_6wbp.jpg
Norwegian Police Badge with double Fasci


Switzerland’s Military Flag circa 1800
Willam Tell near Fasce

File:Emblem of the Spanish Civil Guard.svg
Emblem of Spanish Civil Guard
Fasce, Sword, and Crown

File:Grand Coat of arms of Vilnius.svg
Grand Coat of arms of Vilnius, Lithuania
Fasce and the scales of Justice
Unity, Justice…

File:Flag of the British Union of Fascists (original).svg
Original Flag of the British Union of Fascists

https://i2.wp.com/www.livius.org/a/turkey/ephesus/ephesus_calpurnius_rufus_bm.JPGlictors400.jpg (24233 bytes)
Ancient Roman Fasci
In ancient Rome, the bodyguards of a magistrate carried fasci.

https://i0.wp.com/upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/55/42MPBdeSSI.jpg/91px-42MPBdeSSI.jpg

https://realitybloger.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/78ebf-fascism2bposter.jpghttps://realitybloger.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/8660c-fasc_notus_prima.jpg

–=–

According to Legion XXIV website:

The FASCES was a cylindrical bundle of elm or birch rods bound together by red bands, from which an ax head projected; and which was borne by Lictors (attendants and body guards) before a Consul or high Magistrate, as a symbol of their authority. 

Stephen Phenow, Editor of the Strategikon, provides the following:  “The Fasces was adopted from the Etruscans.  It symbolized the power of life or death that a Roman Magistrate had over the Roman citizen; who could be scourged by the birch rods, representing physical punishment for transgressions;  or be beheaded by the axe for serious crimes.” 

The lowering of the Fasces was a form of salute to a higher official.  It was also an emblem of unity and power;  being used as an icon on coins and “coats of arms” long after the times of Ancient Rome.  The number of Lictores in the Republic varied by magistrial rank.  A Dictator was honored with 24 lictores, each carrying a Fasces;  a Consul was awarded 12, while a Praetor was allowed 6.  Stepen Phenow also adds:  “The Imperator (Emperor) usually was a Consul as well,  so he would maintain 12 licores carrying fasces.  Emperor Claudius had this number proceed him before entering a captured town in Britannia.”  After the reign of Emperor Domitian (81-96AD), the Imperator was accorded 24 lictores.  Benito Mussolini’s Italian “Fascist”Party of the 1930’s, derived its name from the Fasces, which it had adopted as an emblem in 1919. 

The reconstruction shown here was assembled by the Commander in February 2002.    The body is 42 inches (1012mm) long with a 4.5 inch (115mm) stem extending from the bottom.  It weighs 14 pounds and is composed of Thirty-One  3/4 inch (20mm) wood dowels and has a diameter of 5 inches (128mm).  The axe head is 6 inches (152mm), from point to point, and extends 3 inches (76mm) from the bundle.    Some 36 feet (11 meters) of 3/4 inch burgandy leather strapping was used to bind the bundle.  In some Fasces, the axe head was placed in the center of the length of the body.   There are also some representations of the Fasces showing two axe heads, one per side, extending from the opposite sides of the rod bundle. 

The word fasces means “bundle” and refers to the fact that it is a bundle of rods, which surrounded an ax in the middle. In ancient Rome, the lictors carried fasces before consul, praetors and dictators, i.e., magistrates that held imperium (which means that they had the right to command and interpret the flight of the birds). Other people escorted by lictors with fasces were Vestal Virgins, governors, and the commanders of legions.

During the empire, the fasces of the emperor were distinguished from those of the magistrates by laurels. This was a republican custom, however: on festive occasions (e.g., a military victory), fasces could be crowned with laurel. On the other hand, when the city was in mourning, the fasces were sometimes cloaked. If the ax was left out, it could mean that the magistrate wanted to request something from the people or had something to apologize for.

The fasces were a symbol of authority, but the precise meaning is unknown. It is often claimed that the rods could be used to lash people, and the ax to execute them. This may have been true in the days of the monarchy, but not during the republic. After the Laws of the twelve tables, no Roman magistrate could summarily execute a Roman citizen.

The Romans believed that the fasces were introduced in Rome from Etruria. Again, this may be true, but the tradition is open to some criticism. So far, only one set of fasces has been found in Etruria, in the Tomba del littore near Vetulonia, in 1890. This find has been hailed as a confirmation of the tradition, but it should be noted that the archaeologists only found a lot of small rusty flakes, which were interpreted as Etruscan fasces, which, they had to admit, were not identical to Roman fasces. They were entirely made of metal, the ax had two blades, and finally: the Etruscan fasces were extremely small. It has been said that the find from Vetulonia is only a miniature model, but this is poor method: to rescue an interpretation, one introduces a hypothesis.

–=–

So this international symbol of fascism permeates all three branches of government and hangs openly and without fear in the very Halls of Congress that pump out tyranny and oppression on a daily basis.

But our original question was about the force of law; Sheriffs, police, Marshals, and military men…

Is it possible that these men are of a Fraternal Brotherhood unknown to most of their citizen victims?

https://i2.wp.com/thumbs2.ebaystatic.com/d/l225/m/mma9d44jSrpmEwKilbalnrA.jpg
Her Majesty’s Fascist Police


The National Transportation Safety Board


Customs And Border Protection

–=–

Maine Masonry has many notable men in its ranks; men who have accomplished great things in the eyes of a grateful society by performing acts that are just a part of doing their jobs. Our Grand Secretary R.W. Brother Hollis G. Dixon is one of them. He is a Mason who values the act of contributing to his community but would rather not stand in the spotlight for it. He is modest by nature and true to his core beliefs of good citizenship, service, and integrity. Please join us in congratulating Hollis for being named Legendary Trooper of the Maine State Police. Hollis was awarded the honor in a ceremony last week in Augusta and presented with a plaque in recognition of that honor.

Brother Hollis receiving award

“Pictured in the photo from left to right are: Maine State Police Lt. Ralph Pinkham, Retired, who presented the award to Hollis; Maine State Police Captain Hollis “Tom” Dixon, Retired; Gov. John Baldacci; Maine Commissioner of Public Safety Ann Jordan; and Maine State Police Col. Patrick Fleming.  Also in attendance but not pictured were other Troopers who are Masons. Captain Guy Savage, Maine State Police, Retired, who was Tom’s first Sgt. when he joined the State Police and Guy’s son, Cpl. Breen Savage, Retired, who Tom helped train when Breen joined the State Police. (Breen supplied the picture). Also Lt. Gerald “Red” Therrien, Retired, who is active in the Shrine and who Tom raised when he was Master of the Maine State Police Masonic Degree Team.”

(Source: http://www.mainemasonrytoday.com/online/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=93:legendary-trooper-of-maine-state-police&catid=35:freemasonry-in-the-community&Itemid=56)

https://i1.wp.com/www.patchgallery.com/main/albums/batchadd/WAP/Washington-State-Patrol-Free-And-Accepted-Mason-Police-Patch-Washington-Patches-WAPr.jpg

https://i0.wp.com/thumbs4.ebaystatic.com/d/l225/m/m2XiXNQOF1vEBcUqTUVTrJg.jpg
“Friendship, Morality, and Brotherly Love”
Now pay your fine or go to jail!!!

https://i2.wp.com/freemasonrywatch.org/pics/patch1.jpg

https://realitybloger.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/417c9-patch5.jpg

–=–
How about in Canada?


–=–

And for these Masonic Officers in their Morality and Brotherly Love
to exact (extort) from the people they police and serve,
the judges who decide on the ethics of their actions would
have to be an organized Fraternity of Brotherly Love as well…
wouldn’t they?

–=–

https://realitybloger.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/597bc-masoniccornerstonemarker.jpg

https://i2.wp.com/farm8.staticflickr.com/7186/6820800676_8d036287a5_m.jpg
Lampasas County Courthouse, Texas

1885-86 Anderson County courthouse cornerstone, Palestine TX
Anderson County Courthouse, Texas


Travis County Courthouse, Texas

\

wva_masons_cornerstone
Laying the Masonic Cornerstone

“BERKELEY SPRINGS – A ceremony steeped in nearly 300 years of tradition helped mark the placement of the cornerstone for the new Morgan County Courthouse Saturday.

Freemasons from the West Virginia Grand Lodge in Charleston along with members of Deford Lodge No. 88 in Berkeley Springs held a cornerstone ceremony, which is meant to celebrate the construction of the new building and to remind everyone that all things must be built on a strong foundation.

‘It’s just a public awareness to keep the public involved and a celebration of the community,’ said Charlie Montgomery, a member of Deford Lodge. ‘They are able to come together in a time of sharing and fellowship.'”

–=–


Cumberland, Md


Old Lincoln County Courthouse, New Mexico


Old Cameron County Courthouse, Brownsville Texas


Grand Master Hugh Layne (Left) and Judge Pace
seal Courthouse Cornerstone containing ‘Time Capsule’,
Spartanburg County Detention Facility, SC

Freemasons
Local Missouri Freemason lodge conducting a
brief Masonic cornerstone dedication in Kahoka, Montana
for the new courthouse

https://realitybloger.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/18970-guilty.jpg

–=–

“You must conceal all the crimes of your brother Masons, except murder and treason, and these only at your own option, and should you be summoned as a witness against a brother Mason be always sure to shield him. Prevaricate [falsify], don’t tell the whole truth in his case, keep his secrets, forget the most important points… It may be perjury to do this, it is true, but you’re keeping your obligations, and remember if you live up to your obligation strictly, you’ll be free from sin.”

–Edmond Ronayne, “Masonic Handbook,” (page 183)

–=–

What a frightening realization that the upper levels of the justice system is an Order – a Masonic Rite – a Fraternal Brotherhood ordained to enforce and protect the will of the United States, which was created by the same secret society of Masonry in Order to create, impose, protect, and enforce its will upon all people… of which it calls code. If America is under the control of the Masonic Order that controls the United States, and if America was indeed the “New World” as history records, then America is already under the control of the New World Order.

Why does the DMV offer Masonic license plates as a non-profit venture?



Masonic protection from Masonic police…

–=–

Mason-at-sightAt the Philadelphia Masonic Hall…
With an honor guard of troopers standing at ease,
Anthony J. Garvey (center), Chief of Staff of the Grand Lodge,
flanked by Lt. Col. George P. March, P.M. (left), and
Lt. Col. Thomas K. Coury (right), both Deputy Commissioners
of the Pennsylvania State Police, await the arrival of
Col. Paul J. Evanko, Commissioner.

Mason-at-sight
Grand Master Ernette (center) is joined (at left) by
Deputy Commissioners Lt. Col. Coury and Lt. Col. March
to congratulate (at right) Col. Evanko and Lt. Col. Westcott.

–=–

“On Aug. 22, in the presence of the Right Worshipful Grand Master James L. Ernette, three distinguished members of the Pennsylvania State Police were made Masons-at-Sight in the Masonic Temple, Philadelphia. They are: Colonel Paul J. Evanko, Commissioner of the Pennsylvania State Police; Lieutenant Colonel Joseph H. Westcott, Deputy Commissioner; and Trooper Roberto Soto.

Corinthian Hall was filled to capacity, including more than a hundred brethren who are troopers and municipal law enforcement officers.

The brethren who served as the conferring Worshipful Masters were: Entered Apprentice Mason’s Degree, Trooper Edward J. Lizewski; Fellowcraft Mason’s Degree, Trooper Charles J. McBreen; and Master Mason’s Degree, Lt. Col. George P. March, P.M.

The brethren of the Pennsylvania State Police Masonic Degree Team who participated in conferring the three degrees are pictured above with the R.W. Grand Lodge Officers and the new Masons. They are (listed alphabetically): James J. Carey; Thomas K. Coury; Walter C. Ditzler, P.M.; Gerald Eaton, J.D.; David W. Escalet; Patrick Foy, J.W.; Bruce Gaton; Stephen S. Heitz; George F. Himmelright, Jr.; Edward M. Kauffman, S.W.; Edward J. Lizewski, J.W.; George P. March, P.M.; Douglas Martin; Charles J. McBreen, J.D.; Charles L. McBreen, P.M.; Carl E. Mease; Kevin M. Organtini; John G. Richards; Phillip Rickert, J.W.; Robert Robbins, W.M.; James J. Schultz; Vaughn Schwalm; Louis M. Vittor, P.M.; and Serell I. Ulrich.

(Source: PA Grand Lodge website: http://www.pagrandlodge.org/freemason/1198/mas.html)

–=–

Philadephia Inquirer

Suit: Group membership aided trooper

Fri, Jul. 25, 2003

By Chris Gray, Inquirer Staff Writer

George Washington belonged to the fraternity of Free and Accepted Masons. So did Benjamin Franklin, Charles Lindbergh, Clark Gable and Arnold Palmer.

So do numerous Pennsylvania state troopers, including many current and former high-ranking officers. And now allegations have been raised that law enforcement members of the charitable and social fraternity protected former trooper Michael Evans, a Mason since 1989, when he was faced with sexual-misconduct complaints that in some cases led to convictions.

The allegations are contained in the same federal lawsuit that included previously confidential reports of sexual misconduct within the State Police that recently have made headlines.

How many times have we seen police officers bypass the law in their abuse, rape, and murder of citizens?

How many cases are dismissed by judges of that Order?

–=–

“Today, we assemble as Freemasons to celebrate our heritage.
We do so by honoring the memory of a Brother who took advantage
of a most unique opportunity to play an active role in the development
of our state, and in the development of our Grand Lodge.
The Brother is our former Governor George Wesley Atkinson
Atkinson helped to lay a proper foundation so that Ancient Craft Masonry
could assume a prominent role as a leading institution, even to this day,
just as our state has assumed its rightful place of honor among
the United States of America.”

(Source: http://www.wvculture.org/history/organizations/masonicheritage01.html)

–=–

“In the hallways of the grand lodge headquarters, the walls are crowded
with framed photographs of Masons past and present, but mostly past:
Hubert H. Humphrey, the former vice president; and William J. Bratton,
the former police commissioner who is now the chief of police in Los Angeles…”

“New York’s Masons are heavily involved in community service,
underwriting medical research and supplying 29,000 American flags,
one for every public school classroom in the city.
But still there are the secret rooms where Masons gather.”

2006 New York times Article, ‘A Secret Society, Spilling a Few Secrets’
Link–>http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/04/nyregion/04masons.html?_r=0

–=–

Texas Brothers
–=–

–=–
A Royal Pain In The…
–=–

“Two detective chief inspectors among 944 officers in England and Wales
with a criminal record. One officer found guilty of gross misconduct after
sending racist and sexist texts is still in his job. Hundreds of others facing
misconduct allegations are allowed to escape punishment by quitting their forces.”

–=–

POLICE MASONS LIST WILL REMAIN SECRET

Sunday Telegraph  SUNDAY 16 Apr 2000

By Joe Murphy, Political Editor

“The Home Office is to block public access to a register of Freemasons within the police service for fear of damaging confidence in the forces.

It marks a realization among ministers that Labour’s early plans to end the Masonic culture in the judicial system is in danger of backfiring by undermining officers who are innocent of any impropriety. Ministers will announce fresh plans for the register of Freemasons, which is currently voluntary, next month. They have yet to decide over calls from a Labour-dominated Commons committee for it to be strengthened by being made compulsory for police to declare their membership of the secretive society but will undertake that those who do so will not be exposed to public scrutiny.

Labour MPs have long campaigned for Freemasonry to be banned in the judicial system, believing that it fosters corruption by encouraging police and judges to feel they are under an obligation to fellow lodge members. Freemasons, however, insist that the society is merely a charitable and social institution, despite its code of secrecy and rituals.

A Home Office official said: “We are not backing away from the need to establish just how widespread Masonic activity is within the forces but it is a question of how to do it. It will not help if police are deterred from being open about their membership because they think it would be raised in trials or disciplinary hearings. There is a case for public access to the register as a gesture of open government but this is outweighed by the risk that defence lawyers might exploit an officer’s membership to suggest he or she is corrupt.”

Earlier this month, Britain’s most senior Masonic judge attacked the Government’s investigations into Freemasonry. Lord Millett, a sitting law lord, accused a parliamentary inquiry of having “absolutely no basis” and being “oppressive”. He said it had led to defendants demanding to know whether judges hearing their cases and police officers giving evidence against them were Masons.

About 20 per cent of judges have refused to reply to a questionnaire issued by Lord Irvine, the Lord Chancellor, asking if they are Freemasons. The voluntary register for police has fared even worse, with only 38,875 of the 126,000 officers in England and Wales responding, of whom just 417 admitted to being Freemasons. There are an estimated 8,000 Masonic lodges in Britain.”

——————————————————————————————————————————

The Masons Stole My House

By Simon Regan

Scallywag Magazine Issue 25

A tale against corruption in Greenwich involving a solicitor

An astonishing tale of one woman’s battle against corruption in Greenwich council involving a struck-off solicitor convicted for fraud points directly to a conspiracy amongst prominent freemasons to wrongfully repossess council properties and throw the rightful owners onto the streets…

They soon found out, by acquiring a copy of the Lincolnshire Freemason’s handbook, that all the solicitors they had used (and as time went by they used most firms in Lincolnshire) were listed as Masons. More important they were able to expose Leslie Oldman architect of the whole devious scheme. With a mixture of delight and consternation they proved he had been struck off as a solicitor ten years before for sustained forgery and misuse of his client funds – a heinous crime for any solicitor. Yet he was still signing his name as “Assistant Borough Solicitor”. They brought this to the attention of just about everyone, but Oldman is still employed by the council.

Mrs. Riley is now convinced that a regular racket has been taking place in Greenwich for a number of years. It goes like this: A family buys its council house, but solicitors acting for them fail to pay a paltry sum and Oldman is able to step in and repossess. The house is then sold for a song and the partners collect the difference. This time, however, they hadn’t realised Mrs. Riley’ tenacity…

——————————————————————————————————————————

UNITED KINGDOM: The Freemasons and Police

Have the British police fallen under the sway of Freemasons? The boss of Scotland Yard and officials at the Home Office say they are worried about the Freemasons’ influence over senior police officers. Several cases of corruption are said to have been covered up at the bidding of the brotherhood.

At least one in seven male magistrates in the U.K. are members of the Freemason brotherhood, according to a first official survey of the judiciary’s links with the secret organization…

UNITED KINGDOM: FREEMASONS BEND TO PRESSURE

Police officers and local government officials figure largely among the 50 British Freemasons who have resigned from their lodges on claims their careers would be damaged if they were publicly identified as members of “the Craft,”…

UNITED KINGDOM: THE PARLIAMENT WANTS NAMES OF FREEMASONS

Senior officials of the ruling council of British Freemasonry, the United Grand Lodge of England (UGL) , face charges of contempt of parliament if they fail to provide the Commons Select Committee on Home Affairs with the names of 163 members connected with police corruption and miscarriages of justice…

UNITED KINGDOM: FINGER-POINTING AT FREEMASONS

Gavin Purser, president of the United Grand Lodge of England’s Board of General Purposes, has reluctantly given the names of 16 Freemasons linked to a number of controversial police investigations in the 1970s and 1980s to Chris Mullin, chairman of the Commons Home Affairs Committee…

UNITED KINGDOM: FREDERICK CRAWFORD

Prime minister John Major has personally appointed a Freemason, Frederick Crawford, to the £80,000-per-year, part-time post as chairman of the new Criminal Cases Review Authority (CCRA)…

UNITED KINGDOM: NEW WARNING ON MASON LINKS

The Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) has drawn up national guidelines warning police officers that membership of the Freemasons (or other secretive and influential societies) could “compromise their integrity as impartial upholders of the law.

UNITED KINGDOM: POLICE SUPPORT FREEMASON SECRECY

Following the first-ever debate of its kind, the Police Federation rejected a motion by 429 votes to 391 to compel all officers belonging to the Freemason Brotherhood or other secret societies to declare their membership publicly…

–=–

When a government ceases to protect its people and instead that government protects itself from its people, and when the servants of the public become their masters through contract and forced debt slavery, then government is not of the people or for the people. It is then the enemy of the people.

–=–
The Legal Perversion
Of Liberty And Freedom

–=–

So what other proper nouns did these Masons go out of their way to capitalize in specification when designing this corporate charter called the Constitution?

Let’s take a look at the word “Liberty”.

We can see that this noun is capitalized as well, signifying that it represents a specific (proper) type of liberty. As with all of the words included within this constitution, each one carries with it a duel meaning. One is conversational and general to the English language, and denotes the natural state of things. The other is specific to legal and corporate things, and thus is capitalized to ensure that the distinction is clear. The constitution refers to the only type of liberty that a corporation can control, which is political liberty.

Look at the difference between natural liberty and political Liberty as defined by Webster’s:

lib·er·ty

noun \ˈli-bər-tē\

plural lib·er·ties

Definition of LIBERTY

(Natural liberty)

1 : the quality or state of being free:
1a : the power to do as one pleases
1b : freedom from physical restraint
1c : freedom from arbitrary or despotic control
1e : the power of choice
(Political Liberty)
1d : the positive (man’s positive law) enjoyment of various social, political, or economic rights and privileges
2a : a right or immunity enjoyed by prescription or by grant : privilage
2b : permission especially to go freely within specified limits

–=–

The difference between these two meanings of the same word is paramount in importance. In fact, even this definition is an oxymoron. For how can one be free if limits are placed upon that free movement?

The answer is actually a simple one. For the constitution only refers to a specific type of liberty, which is “political Liberty”. In fact, it would be pointless for the constitution to refer to natural liberty as this natural right exists despite the constitution. The constitution did not create nature or God. Only through contract, Trust, and power of attorney can natural rights be squelched by political rights.

While the general term of “liberty” denotes a basic natural form of being free both in life and from tyranny, the opposite is true of the word used in the constitution. The Masonic use of the proper noun “Liberty” denotes a very specific (proper) political use of the word, and thus it becomes as Webster’s describes above a revokable privilege instead of a natural, God-given right.

Perhaps this is easier to understand if we compare it to any other contract you have ever entered into, where you have agreed to follow a certain set of rules as contractually (constitutionally) laid out by the other party or corporation, such as in a gym or club membership. This agreement gives you the political “Liberty” to do only what is allowed by that person or corporation, and takes away any other “liberty” you might have. For instance, a no smoking rule may be enforced. So as a citizen of the United States, you have only political Liberties with no natural liberty. Any natural liberty you might have has simply not been restricted and licensed yet – it has not been made legal or illegal. In other words, if you break any of the increasingly lawless laws of this government (and there are now too many to count or comprehend), you have just broken your contract. In the spiritual jurisdiction of the United States, a citizen only has political “Liberty” (granted privileges) and no other form of “liberty”. For government cannot control your natural rights and liberty to express them without your tacit agreement to be a member of the United States corporation and give up your natural rights for its political rights. Thus, “Liberty” is political, which means that your liberty is a privilege, not a right. The constitution can only grant (create) political rights, not natural ones. Again, understanding the importance in the concept that God and only God can give natural rights is the shield and saber against government political oppression. This does not require actual belief in any tangible or ritualistic “god” or “God”, only the realization that you were born with your rights in nature, without government or a constitution, and that you are the only one who can give those away in exchange for man’s law over nature (God) and yourself.

Citizenship = membership.

Membership = political rights (benefits).

Just as an employee of Walmart must submit to the political Liberty of the Walmart corporation or be punished as an “employee”, so to must an employee (citizen) of the United States submit to the political Liberty of the United States or be punished.

It is perhaps more wise to use the Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856 definition here as this dictionary is quite reflective of the times in which the constitution was created, and was adopted into the law of the United States as the official dictionary.

LIBERTY. Freedom from restraint. The power of acting as one thinks fit, without any restraint or control, except from the laws of nature.

2. Liberty is divided into civil, natural, personal, and political.

3. Civil liberty is the power to do whatever is permitted by the constitution of the state and the laws of the land. It is no other than natural liberty, so far restrained by human laws, and no further, operating equally upon all the citizens, as is necessary and expedient for the general advantage of the public.

(Note: the “public” is government, thus the “public good” is what is good for government)

4. That system of laws is alone calculated to maintain civil liberty, which leaves the citizen entirely master of his own conduct, except in those points in which the public good requires some direction and restraint. When a man is restrained in his natural liberty by no municipal laws but those which are requisite to prevent his violating the natural law, and to promote the greatest moral and physical welfare of the community, he is legally possessed of the fullest enjoyment of his civil rights of individual liberty. But it must not be inferred that individuals are to judge for themselves how far the law may justifiably restrict their individual liberty; for it is necessary to-the welfare of the commonwealth, that the law should be obeyed; and thence is derived the legal maxim, that no man may be wiser than the (man’s) law.

5. Natural liberty is the right which nature gives to all mankind, of diposing of their persons and property after the manner they judge most consonant to their happiness, on condition of their acting within the limits of the law of nature, and that they do not in any way abuse it to the prejudice of other men.

6. Personal liberty is the independence of our actions of all other will than our own. It consists in the power of locomotion, of changing situation, or removing one’s person to whatever place one’s inclination may direct, without imprisonment or restraint, unless by due course of law.

(Note: Don’t get pulled in to “personal liberty”, for it is political and has exceptions, where a judge can “decide” through “due course of man’s law” to take it away. Never turn from God and nature – for a natural right is above all other forms.)

7. Political liberty may be defined to be, the security by which, from the constitution, form and nature of the established government, the citizens enjoy civil liberty. No ideas or definitions are more distinguishable than those of civil and political liberty, yet they are generally confounded. The political liberty of a state is based upon those fundamental laws which establish the distribution of legislative and executive powers. The political liberty of a citizen is that tranquillity of mind, which is the effect of an opinion that he is in perfect security; and to insure this security, the government must be such that one citizen shall not fear another.

8. In the English law, by liberty is meant a privilege held by grant or prescription, by which some men enjoy greater benefits than ordinary subjects. A liberty is also a territory, with some extraordinary privilege.

9. By liberty or liberties, is understood a part of a town or city, as the Northern Liberties of the city of Philadelphia…

–=–

The difference between natural and political liberty is the difference between having a government and not having a govern-ment (being controlled). A government that protects natural rights would be one that is just. It would protect natural law and defend against all other forms except valid contract law (lawful agreements between two or more people). But the United States government goes out of its way to suppress natural rights and liberties in order to replace them with political or “civil” rights and liberties. In other words, the United States seeks to destroy any connection of its citizens to the natural law (to God). And this is when a government is considered no longer just and moral. This is when government is fascist. And when we pledge our allegiance to its flag, we have no idea that “Liberty and Justice for All” is the socialist/fascist kind of political liberty and justice for all citizens, not all men.

–=–

How about the word “Welfare” as used in the Masonic Constitution?

Look at the absolute opposite difference in definitions presented here by Webster’s:

wel·fare

noun \ˈwel-ˌfer\

Definition of WELFARE

(Natural welfare)

1 : the state of doing well especially in respect to good fortune, happiness, well-being, or prosperity <must look out for your own welfare>

(Political Welfare)

2a : aid in the form of money or necessities for those in need
2b : an agency or program through which such aid is distributed

–=–

Again, we see here the very opposite meanings of this dualistic word Welfare as a proper noun.

Consider for a moment the actual government Welfare System and Agency in the United States. Social Security was created in Title 42 of United States Code (US CODE).

Can you guess what this chapter of US CODE is called?

U.S.C. TITLE 42: THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE

Some refer to the Social Security system as unconstitutional, and yet here in the constitution is the very reference that makes it and the enforcement system around it indeed constitutional. For the only form of welfare that the United States corporation can give you is the type that you contract to receive – political Welfare as a monetary instrument (Security). Your own personal or natural welfare is your natural right and responsibility. Government can only provide political Welfare to citizens under contract. And that privilege provided by government, as we see in modern times, can in fact be detrimental to your natural welfare and health. The problem is that by default, a citizen agrees to give up his or her natural welfare in exchange for the government privilege of political Welfare.

For any political right taken by men from government will replace his or her natural right. Any political liberty taken will replace natural liberty. And any political freedom taken from government will make every man naturally less free.

Oh, did you believe that the constitution gave you freedom?

Well, you were right, for it gives you nothing but political freedom.

FREEDOM, Liberty; the right to do what is not forbidden by law. Freedom does not preclude the idea of subjection to law; indeed, it presupposes the existence of some legislative (man’s law) provision, the observance of which insures freedom to us, by securing (forcing) the like observance from others. –Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856

Defending Freedom… or forcing and enforcing it?
Freedom = To obey the Law of the Law Society

–=–

I always believed that freedom was a choice. But indeed, the only freedom a citizen of the United States can enjoy is the revokable privilege of a political right – which means that he must obey the law no matter how opposed it is to natural law. Freedom is a political privilege, not a natural right. And it can be taken away at any time. For free men give up that natural right to accept political entitlement and benefit – trading the natural state of being free for the political right to obey the law (freedom). So we must always remember that freedom is a government granted privilege, and it specifically means that you must obey the law of government. This is the difference between natural and political freedom. For political freedom only means to obey the law – even when the law is lawless and is specifically designed to take away all of your natural rights. For political freedom squashes your natural right to be free. And this is the only Freedom that is protected by the constitution – the kind that takes away your state of being free and responsible for your own actions.

As Webster’s has so eloquently differentiated above, when the constitution proclaims that it shall “promote the general Welfare“, it was specifically laying the legal groundwork for everything that is within Title 42, including Social Security and Medicare, which are massive investment pension funds of government that funnel billions each year in taxation, and which government requires citizens to contribute to. When tax is no longer a choice and when tax debtors are imprisoned, government has shown itself as a tyrant.

Of course, it seems that no one has considered that this little word in the constitution that has inspired such a dramatic and tyrannical “Welfare Program” in the United States is also the very thing that makes Obama-care (the new socialist government health care insurance plan) a valid corporate endeavor of this corporate United States, forcing political Welfare upon the citizens of the United States. After all, the vast majority of this Obama-Care Act was placed into US CODE – TITLE 42: THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE!

So Obama-Care is certainly constitutional!!!

But then, anymore, what isn’t?

Read more on Obama-Care and the true nature of the Courts and this nation, here: realitybloger.wordpress.com/2012/07/04/why-the-supreme-court-claims-obamacare-is-constitutional/

–=–

We must also examine the first phrase in the constitution, which is “We, the People…”.

I’m sure by this point I shouldn’t need to try and convince you that the capitalized version of a word is very different than the un-capitalized version of the same word. The word “People” is no exception. Can you guess why this word was capitalized?

The word “We” signifies the signers of the constitution who make the claim to be the “People” of the United States.

It may be easiest to understand what this means by simple interchanging the word “People” with the word “undersigned”. For the Signers were “the People”.

We, the undersigned, in Order…

If this phrase had meant in general terms all the people in the 13 colonies, there would be no reason to be proper with this noun. And if this was the case, for this to have been a lawfully binding contract on all of those people, every last man, woman, and child would have had to sign this constitution.

But as a proper noun, this word “People” refers solely to the men signing this constitution, with added emphasis in the word “We”.

The constitution in fact cannot refer to any man other than those who signed that document, just as a contract from Walmart would have no effect on anyone but the specific People who sign that document. If Walmart sent you a letter tomorrow stating that you must accept Walmart Healthcare you would laugh incredulously and throw the letter where it belongs – in the trash. Yet as a member of the corporation of the United States who receives the benefits of that citizenship, you are required by your United States employer to take its Health and Welfare called Obama-Care.

In other words, it is your political right to have Obama-Care forced upon you, because you gave up your natural right to not have it forced upon you through your contractual nature with the United States as its citizen.

Webster’s makes this distinction nicely…

———————————————————————————————————————-

1peo·ple

noun \ˈpē-pəl\

plural people

Definition of PEOPLE

(Natural people vs specific Political People)

1 plural : human beings making up a group or assembly or linked by a common interest…
3 plural : the members of a family or kinship
4 plural : the mass of a community as distinguished from a special class <disputes between the people and the nobles> —often used by Communists to distinguish Communists from other people
5 plural peoples : a body of persons that are united by a common culture, tradition, or sense of kinship, that typically have common language, institutions, and beliefs, and that often constitute a politically organized group
6 : lower animals usually of a specified kind or situation
7 : the body of enfranchised citizens of a state

–=–

TO ENFRANCHISE.
To make free to incorporate a man in a society or body politic.
–Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856

–=–

Here again we see the distinction between people as human beings (all people in the country) and the People (the special class) who signed the constitution. As an Order of Masons, the People in the constitution are the men who signed it.

The word “we” is defined as –

I and the rest of a group that includes me : you and I : you and I and another or others : I and another or others not including you —used as pronoun of the first person plural”

In any contract, the only people affected by said contract are the signers of that contract, and this requires free will, acquiescence, consent, and a meeting of the minds before the signature is applied. But there is no mind behind the constitution, for it is artificial, and no meeting of minds can be had. Acceptance of that document as if it were a contract is a unilateral submission to the Federal Government. And while your acceptance forces you to accept terms and laws, government is not bound by and can change that constitution at any time. You, the individual, can not.

No man has the power to contract other men without their consent. Thus, we can also see the clear distinction made in this first sentence:

“We the People of the United States, in Order… do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

The People of the United States are quite different from the people of the 50 states united in America. The United States, according to the constitution, is a 10 mile square tract of land called a corporate municipal “District”, which is not in America. Whereas the United States of America is the entirety of the 50 States and all people within those 50 countries, the United States is a specific corporation. The United States of America were the 13 colonies. The United States is specifically and distinctly different and outside of the 50 specific states united in America. The People of the United States were not the people of America – the “lower animals” naturally born in their countries.

And as we have now discovered, this Order of Masons was indeed the People of the constitution.

But these People had something else in common… their blood!

For they were in fact the People as defined above as “the members of a family or kinship“.

–=–
The Blood Oath…
More Than Meets The Eye
–=–

George Washington has quite the royal bloodline. He is 2nd cousin, 9 times removed from current Prince William of England – who is the 27th great grandson of Charlemagne.

Thomas Jefferson is the 6th cousin, 5 times removed of the current Queen Elizabeth II.

It turns out that all past presidents of the United States corporation are cousins of this royal line.

Barack Husein Obama, the current president, has this as his lineage:

William The Conquerer – 22nd Great Grandson
Anne Boleyn, Queen of England – 1st cousin, 15 time removed
Henry V, King of England – 1st cousin, 19 times removed
Henry VIII, King of England – 1st cousin 16 times removed
Mary I, Queen of Scott’s, 3rd cousin, 14 times removed
James Madison, U.S. President, 3rd cousin, 8 times removed
Harry Truman and Abe Lincoln, U.S. Presidents – 7th cousins
Jimmy Carter, U.S. President – 8th Cousin
Dick Cheney, U.S. vice-President for Bush Jr. – 8th cousin
Gerald Ford, u.S. President – 9th cousin
Thomas Jefferson, U.S. President, 10th cousin, 6 times removed
Sarah Palin, Governor and Obama’s competition – 10th cousin

George Bush Sr/Jr, as are all presidents, are both of this royal line. Bush Jr. is related to:

Vlad The Impaler (A.K.A. Dracula) – 32nd Great Grandson
Diana, Princess of Wales – 11th cousin, 2 times removed
Millard Fillmore and James Garfield, U.S. Presidents – 4th cousins
Franklin Peirce, U.S. President – 5th cousin
Gerald Ford, William Taft, Calvin Coolridge, U.S. Presidents – 6th cousins
Theodore Roosevelt, Abe Lincoln, U.S. Presidents – 7th cousins
Richard Nixon, U.S. President – 9th cousins
Dick Cheny, Bush’s vice-President – 9th cousin, 1 time removed
John Kerry, Senator and Obama Cabinet, and Bush’s competition – 9th cousin, 2 times removed
Barrack Obama, current U.S. President – 11th cousin
Sarah Palin, Governor and Obama’s competition – 11th cousin

And of course in true incestuous fashion, George W. Bush is 9th cousins with Barbara Peirce, his own mother!

**Note: John Kerry is also the 34th Great Grandson of Vlad The Impaler.

**Note: These are very incomplete lists.

Here is a picture of Former President Franklin Peirce, who’s granddaughter Barbara Peirce married George H. W. Bush and bore the president named George W Bush. Next to that is a current picture of Mitt Romney. The resemblance of the bloodline is uncanny.

–=–

So who were the signers of the constitution of the United States that were also this Order of People?

Nothing more than cousins and offspring of the kings and queens of England – Master Masons with intentions other than the free state of all people (animals) and with the intent to establish a charter for the incorporation of power in the “New World” for their own bloodline “People”, with all other people subject to that power.

 photo PicBushMasons.jpg
George W. Bush, Deist Master Mason Extraordinaire

https://realitybloger.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/abeb9-billclintonsmasc383c2b3n-jerusalempostnov-1994.jpg
Jerusalem Post, 1994
With guest speaker, President and Mason Bill Clinton?

https://i0.wp.com/www.eburgmasons.com/images/35_tr.jpg
Roosevelt

https://i2.wp.com/www.eburgmasons.com/images/35_gf.jpg
Gerald Ford (real name: Leslie Lynch King)
Notice the crescent and star

https://i0.wp.com/www.phoenixmasonry.org/10,000_famous_freemasons/images/harry_s_truman_pgm_missouri_1.jpgHarry S. Truman


Warren G. Harding

https://i0.wp.com/www.eburgmasons.com/images/35_bf.jpg
Ben Franklin


George Washington Masonic Temple Museum

Excerpt from the museum literature:

The movement to erect a Masonic Memorial started at a meeting held in Alexandria, Virginia, on February 10, 1910. Upon invitation of Alexandria-Washington Lodge No. 22, the representatives of 18 Grand Lodges assembled in the sacred precincts of the Lodge Room of the city Hall of Alexandria to consider the subject in all its details. The following year, February 22, 1911, 27 representatives of 27 Grand Jurisdictions assembled and organized the George Washington Masonic National Memorial Association. The association unanimously adopted and approved a resolution to erect a Masonic Temple as a memorial to George Washington, under the auspices of the Lodge. The financial policy of the Association from the very beginning has been “pay as you go”, so that there is no indebtedness in connection with its construction. Ground was broken June 5, 1922…”

“The edifice is designed in the classic architecture of Greece and Rome. Situated on a 36 acre tract of land, it rises 333 feet from its foundation, and contains 9 floors. The records of the Lodge are virtually an unbroken chain of historic Masonic events from 1783 to the present time. All of the records, most of the original furniture, the Master’s Chair–presented to the Lodge by Washington and occupied by in 1788-1789 while Master–the original portrait of Washington by Williams, as well as several other items are still in possession of the Lodge.”

–=–

https://i1.wp.com/25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lwh47juLOi1qzv0ebo1_400.jpg

Men Who Changed The Coursr Of History!

Sharing the Traditions of Our Founding Fathers

“Masons were active in Massachusetts even before 1733, the year the first Provincial Grand Lodge of Masons was formally organized by Henry Price. Today, the Grand Lodge in Boston remains the oldest continuously operating Masonic organization in the Western Hemisphere.

In the early years, Masonry numbered among its members some of the nation’s most influential citizens – among them George Washington, Henry Knox, Benjamin Franklin, John Hancock and Paul Revere.”

http://www.boylstonlodge.org/zmassfreemasons.html

–=–

Paul Revere, Mason and Founding Father.

As Grand Master of Massachusetts,

Paul Revere wrote to Washington, March 21, 1797:

“Of these (Masonic teachings) may you partake in all their purity and satisfaction; and we will assure ourselves that your attachment to this social plan will increase; and that under the auspices of your encouragement, assistance and patronage, the Craft will attain its highest ornament, perfection, and praise. And it is our ardent prayer, that when your light shall be no more visible in this earthly temple, you may be raised to the All Perfect Lodge above; be seated on the right of the Supreme Architect of the Universe, and there receive the refreshment your labors merited.”

–=–

So were all the common people born equal?

Under God, perhaps. Under the constitution, absolutely not.

Remember, all people would include all black people as well. But Negros weren’t considered people in the constitution, and the founding fathers were most certainly plantation slave-owners! And let’s face it, women were hardly complete people either in terms of the fabled and fallacious “born equal” clauses that get parroted by unabashedly ill-informed patriots and nationalists out there. No vote = no equality.

Obviously, the constitution did not include Negros (slaves) as People.

And don’t even get me started on the genocide of the Native Indians, referred to as savages!

This again shows you clearly that the “People” referred to in the constitution did not include “all” (or any) common “people”, and thus the definitions of these capitalized legal words is paramount to our understanding of the true intent of these Masonic founding fathers. All men, according to the original constitution, are certainly not created equal. Some were in fact 3/5 men for purposes of statistical data in taxation, and the female ones weren’t really anything at all. The status of a legal and equal “woman” citizen was created only after “civil rights” was created, and so the female of the species man was able to assume the legal status of a male in contractual servitude as a wo-man. This did not create natural equality, for there is no such thing. It only created a political status. This specifically female version of man (mankind) furthers our understanding that the constitution was nothing but a legal document that only applied to specific artificial persons (as a legal status). Only God decides what is equal, and nature takes care of the rest. Equality will always be nothing if not a state of mind in all men (male and female), not a punishable, contractual obligation.

So indeed, this lets us know that the word “People” and the word “Men” were used to denote a specific legal status, not generally all men as natural flesh and blood beings, and certainly not colored men.

And again, I hope you take notice that people (as in the common human beings) were defined as lower animals usually of a specified kind or situation’. We find this legal definition repeated in various chapters of U.S. Code, where man is defined as animal and is managed as a resource (chattel controlled through “human resources”).

The term blood oath as a sacra-ment should right about now take upon itself a whole new meaning…

–=–
Excerpts From The Holy Masonic Bible
–=–

This 1942 Masonic Bible quotes many writings, most notably Albert Pike’s: “Morals and Dogma”. Then follows a question and answer section, and these read like a history lesson in true American and Masonic history – the forbidden kind. Here I have reprinted some of those quotes for our purposes:

Begin excerpts:

“A Lodge” is defined to be an assemblage of Freemasons, duly congregated, having the sacred writings, square, and compass, and a charter, or warrant of constitution, authorizing them to work. The room or place in which they meet, representing some part of King Solomon’s Temple, is also called the Lodge…” –Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma

“Force, unregulated or ill-regulated, is not only wasted in the void, like that of gunpowder burned in the open air, and steam unconfined by science; but, striking in the dark, and its blows meeting only in the air, they recoil and bruise itself. It is destruction and ruin, it is the volcano, the earthquake, the cyclone;– not growth and progress. It is Polyphemus blinded, striking at random, and falling headlong among the sharp rocks by the impetus of his own blows… The blind force of the people is a Force that must be economized, and also managed, as the blind Force of steam, lifting the ponderous iron arms and turning the large wheels, is made to bore and rifle the canon and to weave the most delicate lace. It must be regulated by Intellect.” –Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma

**Author’s Note: The U.S. military is a force regulated by Masonry, in order to keep the blind force of the common people (the employed) on a steady course to support and supply the nation and bloodlines.

“Christianity taught the doctrine of FRATERNITY;  but repudiated that of political EQUALITY, by continually inculcating obedience to Caesar, and to those lawfully in authority. Masonry was the first apostle of EQUALITY. In the Monastery there is fraternity and equality, but no liberty. Masonry added that also, and claimed for man the three-fold heritage, (political) LIBERTY, EQUALITY, and FRATERNITY.” –Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma

“All religions express symbolism; since we can describe only what we see, and the true objects of religion are THE SEEN… All language is symbolic, so far as it applied to mental and spiritual phenomena and action. All words have, primarily, a material sense, however they may afterward get, for the ignorant, a spiritual non-sense.” –Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma

**Author’s Note: Pike here is speaking of the non-sense of the citizenry of the United States, who put spiritual relevance to the constitution, as well as follow religious dogma without understanding the hidden symbols and meaning of its words.

“After you become a Master Mason, no matter what added Masonic honor may come to you, no matter how high you may rise in the symbolic branches of the order, if you keep your vows as a Master Mason you have attained all there is, fulfilled all there is and received all there is to be received that fraternity and brotherhood, existing under a common impulse, can dispense among those who embrace the laws and edicts of a common procedureMasonry, after all, is but a rule for orderly righteousness.” –Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma

**Author’s Note: “Orderly righteousness” describes government, the BAR society, law enforcement (Fraternities), congress, etc…

MOST EXCELLENT MASTER – Dedicated to the memory of King SolomonThe Masonic tradition upon which the degree is founded is described in the ancient Book of Constitutions, in the following words: “…it is still retained by us as a memorial of the method adopted by the King of Israel to distinguish the most skilful portion of the craft, and to reward them for their services in behalf of the fraternity.”

ORDER OF THE RED CROSS – “The Order of the Red Cross is founded upon Truth, recognizing the GOD OF TRUTH as the only true and living Deity… Influenced in a measure by his Jewish Friend, Prince Zerubbabel(Chosen God)– and believing in the One God as did Israel, Darius registered a vow with God that he would rebuild His Temple at JerusalemThe Law of Judaism was active, educating and preparing us for Christianity. As the most exalted TRUTH was implicitly present in Judaism and is now explicitly present in Christianity, so the candidate finds the TRUTH OF TRUTHS implicit in the Order of the Red Cross, but explicit in the Order of the Temple… As Judaism prepared the world for Christianity, so is the Illustrious Order of the Red Cross a preparation for the Christian Order of the Temple.”

REBUILDING THE TEMPLE – “Released from captivity by the decree of the great Cyrus, issued B.C. 536, the Jews, led by Zerubbabel, reached the then desolated Jerusalem on the 20th day of Tebeth, B.C. 535, and began building the Second Temple. This was finished the 23rd day of Adar, B.C. 515.”

**Author’s Note: Zerubbabel was the head of the tribe of Judah during the time of the return from the Babylon exile. He was the prime builder of the second Temple, which was later re-constructed by King Herod. He led the first group of captives back to Jerusalem and began rebuilding the Temple on the old site. For some 20 years he was closely associated with prophets, priests, and kings until the new Temple was dedicated and the Jewish sacrificial system was re-established. The “Third Temple” referred to above represents the building of the 3rd Temple of Solomon. Remember this above all else, for this goal is coming to fruition…

https://i0.wp.com/antimatrix.org/Convert/Books/ZioNazi_Quotes/img/Masonry_is_based_on_Judaism.jpg

–=–
Rebuilding Solomon’s Temple
Creating A Religious Racial War
–=–

The Israel National News reported on 7/30/2012:

“Romney’s love for Jerusalem is part of his Mormon faith’s 170-year-old ties to Israel and its dictate to “rebuild the city and the Temple.”…

(Mark) Paredes, author of the newspaper’s “Jews and Mormons” blog, said that Latter Day Saints (LDS) “have dedicated the Land of Israel for the gathering of the Jewish people on many occasions, beginning with Elder Orson Hyde in 1841. In 1845, all of the apostles called on the Jews ‘in the name of the Messiah, to prepare, to return to Jerusalem in Palestine; and to rebuild that city and temple unto the Lord.’”

Public places in Netanya and on the Mount of Olives in Jerusalem have been dedicated to Hyde.

*Israel is the only country in the world whose creation was expressly called for and supported by Mormon leaders,” according to Paredes who added, “George Albert Smith, LDS Church President at the time of Israel’s creation in 1948, publicly and privately assured many Jewish leaders of his support for their efforts to establish a Jewish state.”

*Israel Bonds were first issued in 1951. One year later, Church President David O. McKay purchased $5,000 of Israel Bonds on behalf of the church, stating that he was doing this ‘to show our sympathy with the effort being made to establish the Jews in their homeland.’”

Romney’s love for Israel apparently is a personal love and not a political posture. Paredes wrote, “As more and more Jews and Israelis become familiar with the history of LDS-Jewish relations, they will better understand why Mormons feel a special closeness to them.”…”

(Source: http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/158404)

–=–

The Times Of Israel, also on 7/30/2012, reported:

“MK Zevulun Orlev of the Jewish Home party has called for massive reforms, including new Basic Laws, in order to establish a Third Temple in Jerusalem.

In an article (PDF) published in advance of the fast of Tisha B’Av in the weekly Hebrew journal Olam Katan, entitled “Internal and Legislative Reform,” Orlev wrote that the Temple must be rebuilt in Jerusalem and that “fundamental changes” to Israeli society and government were necessary in order to realize the success of the project.

Besides spiritual reform and the creation of a cadre of religious experts capable of running the Temple, Orlev argued that the government — “assuming the government will choose to be democratic” — must turn back dissent surrounding the project.

“It will be necessary to defeat no-confidence motions, to overcome the hostile, left-wing, secular media, and to ignore eye-rolling economists who will say it’s a waste of public funds,” he wrote.

To forestall appeals to the High Court of Justice, Orlev advocated the legislation of a new Basic Law that would guarantee funding and manpower and protect the Third Temple from prosecution.

The law will also protect the [Third Temple] project from accusations of discrimination, inequality of women in the Temple service, and animal cruelty in the offering of sacrifices,” Orlev continued.

Orlev acknowledged that to remove the “religious and political impediment” to his plan, namely the presence of the al-Aqsa Mosque and Dome of the Rock atop the Temple Mount,  would mean that the “billion-strong Muslim world would surely launch a world war.” However, he added, “everything political is temporary and there is no stability,” and ”Of late we’re witnessed dramatic political changes that have occurred in many Arab countries.”

Orlev recently advocated a bill to bypass the High Court of Justice and protect illegally constructed buildings in the Beit El neighborhood of Givat Ulpana that was struck down by the Knesset in June.”

(Source: http://www.timesofisrael.com/jewish-home-mk-calls-for-a-third-temple-in-jerusalem/)

–=–

Now, I don’t know about you, but this is one of the most arrogant displays of carelessness and foulness I have ever beheld. To openly admit to the idea of starting a racial and religious war as planned for centuries is the epitome of Zionist horror and terrorism.

The rebuilding of Solomon’s Temple is the holy goal of international Masonry, this is clear. The Masonic Order is often referred to as the re-builders of Solomon’s Temple.

The “Third Temple“, or Ezekiel’s Temple (Hebrew‎: Beit haMikdash haShlishi), is a Jewish Holy Temple architecturally described and prophesied in the Book of Ezekiel, a house of prayer for all people with a sacrificial service. It is noted by Ezekiel as an eternal edifice and permanent dwelling place of the God of Israel on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem.

Issac Newton, a famous Mason, drew the following blueprint:

File:Isaac Newton's Temple of Solomon.jpg

–=–

Within our Masonic Bible, the first section is dedicated to the “Building of Solomon’s Temple”, with many references and indexes throughout the book referring to its building and rebuilding. In describing a painting, it states:

Scene and Location: On Mount Moriah, within the walls of Jerusalem.

Principal Characters: King Solomon; Hifam, king of Tyre; Hiram Abif.

Particular Event Or Occasion: King David, Solomon’s father and predecessor on the throne of Israel, was forbidden by the Lord to build a temple because he was a man of war and had shed blood. He was assured, however, that his son would build the temple and he was permitted to gather large sums of money and to make other preparations for its construction. Soon after his succession to the throne, Solomon planned to build the temple within a period of seven years.

Details Of The Picture: …Hiram, king of Tyre, had been an intimate friend of David for many years, and in an alliance with the king of Israel had prepared much of the material for the temple in the forests of Mount Lebanon and in the quarries of his country. Hirm Abif, a skilled workman in metal, stone, and wood, was the principal architect and engineer. He served as Master Mason and overseer in the building of the temple, supervising the labors of the best workmen that could be found.

–=–

The Masonic Red Letter Edition King James Bible then enters into a question and answer chapter, which is entitled:

Questions and Answers Relating to Characters, Places, Words and Phrases Used in Symbolic Masonry“.

Here is a selection of some of those printed within:

–=–

Q. Hebrew Language: Why is it of the greatest importance in Free-masonry?

A. Because the alphabet and its numerical values is the key to the greater number of words employed in Masonry as well as the mysteries of the Bible.

Q: “Illuminate”: What does it signify?

A: The enlightened, and is used on Latin diplomas as an epithet of Freemasons.

Q: Adam: The meaning of the name of the first man.

A: Adam – derived from the Hebrew ADaMaH – the ground. From AdAm, to be red, relating to his complexion. As the Solar allegory, takes us back 4200 years B.C.

Q: Abraham: In what degree of Masonry is he impersonated?

A: Order of the High Priest (Excellent) represented by Joshua, the first High Priest of the Jews (Zechariah, 3, 1-9, Page 567)

Q: Constitutions: In which year was the first Book of Constitutions published?

A: 1723

–=–

Ahiman Rezon, written by Laurence Dermott in 1764,
was the Book of Constitutions for the Ancients Grand Lodge,
a ritual that is still in wide usage. The title was derived from
three Hebrew words, “ahim“, “manah“, and “raizon“.

What does the term Ahiman Rezon mean?

At different times it has been interpreted as:

A Help to a Brother; Faithful Brother Secretary; Will of Selected Brethren;
Law of Prepared Brethren; Secrets of a Prepared Brother; Royal Builder;
and The Thoughts or Opinions of a True and Faithful Brother.

–=–

Q: Colors: What are the colors of Ancient Craft Masonry?

A: Entered Apprentice – White. Fellow Craft – Blue. Master Mason – Red. (Red, White, and Blue)



What the American Flag might have been…

–=–

Q: Guilds: What three classes existed in England?

A: Religious guilds of the Church of Rome, Merchant guilds in the Livery Companies of London, Craft guilds as in the present day Trade Unions.

Q: Occasions (Four): Upon what occasions may the “Grand Honors” of Masonry be given?

A: When a “Masonic Hall” is to be consecrated: a “Master-Elect” to be installed: a “New Lodge” to be constituted; or a “Grand Master, or deputy to be received on an official visitation.”

Q: From what country was American Freemasonry derived?

A: England.

Q: Masonically, what may be said of the Boston Tea Party?

A: It had its installation in a Masonic Lodge Room, participating in the raid, all were Masons.

–=–

“Sponsered by the George Washington Masonic Stamp Club.”

–=–

Q: Was Masonry practiced in the Revolutionary Army?

A: Yes.

Q: Who was the first Master of Alexandria Lodge No. 22, Alexandria, Va.?

A: George Washington.

Q: What change was later made in the name of this Lodge?

A: Alexandria Washington Lodge No. 22, A.D. 1805.

Q: Did Washington follow the Masonic custom when he laid the cornerstone of the new Capitol building in 1793?

A: No. It was laid in the South East corner.

Q: Name five of the ten early Presidents of the United States who were Masons.

A: Washington, Monroe, Jackson, Polk, Buchanan.

Q: What distinguished French officer in the Revolutionary War was a Mason?

A: Marquis de Lfayette, who was made a Mason in an army Lodge at Valley Forge by Washington himself.

Q: Who presented Washington with an embroidered satin apron?

A: Madame Lafayette. The apron was conveyed by the Marquis from Paris to General Washington at Mt. Vernon. It is preserved by the Washington Benevolent Society at Philadelphia, and the Grand Lodge of Pennsylvania. It is the most prized relic of Masonry in the U.S.A.

Q: Where was the first Masonic hall erected in America?

A: Philadelphia, A.D. 1734.

–=–

In the 1700s, J.J.C Bode wrote about the Masons in France, which were called the Philadelphes:

“We agreed… for France, we would adopt the name Philadelphes instead of Illuminati.”

In a document titled “Grand Lodge of the Philadelphes – General Statutes” dated 1861, a Communication issued from E. Benoit, the President of the Grand Lodge of Philadelphes in 1860 states:

“Moreover one must judge of a tree by its fruits. Well, can you mention within your vast Masonic empire a single Lodge that has produced such results? In the space of ten years, she has initiated above 300 profanes; she has founded Lodges in Belgium, Switzerland, England, as you well know, and America; and her children, indefatigable apostles of Masonry, have raised the first Masonic temple at Ballarat.”

–=–

Q: By what name were the Masons anciently known?

A: Long before the building of Solomon’s Temple, Masons were known as the “Sons of Light.


It’s a Phoenix, not an Eagle!

–=–

“Like its Patron Order – Free Masonry – The Order of the Eastern Star inculcates and promotes the principles of loyalty to one’s country, and of obedience to civil law. Its tenets enforce the fundamentals of freedom, equal rights and liberties to all, and the extension of these privileges to all the peoples of the earth. It undertakes to prepare the women of this age for the righteous performances of their enlarged civil and political privileges which have been given to them through the influence of Christianity. It teaches its members of every race and nationality to honor the flag of their native land.”

–=–


Pay attention to my right hand…
while my left hand points to the American flag with its stars upside down.

–=–

Q: Masonry: The probable antiquity?

A: It is admitted that Masonry is descended from the Ancient Mysteries. These were first arranged when the constellation Leo was at the Summer Solstice. The solar allegory proves this a fact, and would take us back to 4200 years B.C. Thus the Antiquity of Masonry is written in the starry heavens.

Q: Moses: Who is he?

A: The lawgiver of the Jews who plays an important part in the Holy Royal Arch of the American York Rite.

Q: What is the meaning of the name Moses?

A: It is derived from two Hebrew words “Moce” and “oushes” signifies “saved from the water“.

Q: Lodge of St. John: What is it?

A: Masonic tradition says this was the primitive Mother Lodge, held at Jerusalem, dedicated to St. John the Baptist, and then to St. John the evangelist, and finally to both, called “The Lodge of the Holy Sts. John of Jerusalem, and from this Lodge, all other Lodges descended.”

Q: Origins: What is the 12 generally accepted origins of Masonry?

A: Patriarchal Religion, Ancient Mysteries, Temple of Solomon, To the Crusaders, To the Knights Templars, to the Roman Colleges of Artificers, To the Operative Masons of the Middle Ages, To the Rosicrucians, To Oliver Cromwell for political reasons, To the Pretender for the restoration of the House of Stuart, to the British throne, to Sir Christopher Wren, to Dr Desaguliers and others in 1717.

John Theophilus Desaguliers.jpgDr. John Theophilus Desaguliers
member of the Royal Society of London
beginning 29 July 1714.
Experimental assistant to Mason Sir Isaac Newton
Third Grand Master in 1719, and Deputy Grand Master in 1723
and 1725 of the Premier Grand Lodge of England

–=–

Q: Triangular Chain: What is the legend of the triangular chain?

A: When the Jewish Masons were led in captivity from Jerusalem to Babylon by Nebuchadnezzar, they were bound by triangular chains, as an insult, because, to them the triangle was a symbol of Deity, to be made use of only on sacred occasions.


The Double triangle

The Star of David? Or is there more to this symbol?

Solomon’s Seal

Solomon’s Seal at Lion’s Gate, Old Jerusalem wall


Rosicrucian Museum, San Jose, California


Hexagram and Rose Cross, Rosicrucian Museum, San Jose, California

File:Rose Cross Lamen.svg
The Rosy Cross (Rose Cross and Rose Croix) Symbol of Christian Rosenkreuz,
Qabbalist and alchemist and founder of the Rosicrucian Order.

–=–

From “History & Doctrines of the Rose-Croix” by Paul Sedir, we get a description of the Rose Cross as “one of the manifestations of the Providence of God.”:

“But the Earth is constitutionally incapable of conserving the gift which God has given it for long without deforming it; man has the power to stray from the road which had been drawn out for him. Then Divine Mercy sends beings who bring hope; or an exemplar who comes among men to play the role fulfilled by the comets in the cosmos. Such is the function of secret societies; such is the mission of the messengers of the Absolute, notably the Rose-Croix.”

On page 23, Sedir explains the 8-symbol “Rose”:

“After triangular emblems, the seal of Brahatma and the triangle of the holy syllable, the most ancient Masonic emblem which the ancient priesthood has bequeathed is that of the Rose-Croix… This rose was placed in the center of a cross, because the latter expressed to them the idea of rectitude and infinity; of rectitude, by the intersection of its lines at a right angle and of infinity, because these lines can be extended to infinity and that, by a rotation made by the thought about the verticle line, they represent the triple senses of hight, breadth and depth.”

Freemasons = The Sons Of Light

–=–


5-pointed star?
The Lesser Key of Solomon.


Crescent and six pointed Star from the seal of the
Jewish Community of Regensburg, Germany, Middle ages


Solomon’s Seal opposite the entrance to the Rockefeller Museum
formerly the Palestine Archaeological Museum, in East Jerusalem


Solomon’s Seal by the “New Gate” in wall surrounding Old Jerusalem


Solomon’s Seal in Jaffa Gate of Old Jerusalem wall,
also called “Gate of the Prayer Niche of David”; also David’s Gate


Door Knocker on Jewish home in Haifa


Arab Star of David


Contemporary Crescent and six pointed Star in the old City of Jerusalem.
In Arabic this crescent emblem is called hilal.

–=–

The origin of the now famous Islamic symbol of the five pointed star and the crescent was not Islamic but Sassanian, and at first it had six points on the star.  The five pointed star and the crescent actually became a symbol of Islam only during the 19th century, placed on the Ottoman flag from 1793. It entered the Turkish Flag in 1923 and then was adopted by other Muslim countries.

The ancient Crescent and six pointed Star also appear on a Roman Denarius minted by Augustus (27 BC-CE 14):

The Sassanid Empire was founded by Ardashir I, after the fall of the Arsacid Empire and the defeat of the last Arsacid king, Artabanus V. According to the Encyclopedia of the Peoples of Asia and Oceania, “at its largest point in the seventh century the Sassanid Empire included territory in contemporary Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Afghanistan, Yemen, Oman, Israel, Lebanon, Syria, United Arab Emirates, Jordan, Turkey, Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, and parts of Kazakhstan, Pakistan, India, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Libya, Kyrgyzstan. and Tajikistan.” It was the last pre-Islamic Persian Empire, ruled by the Sasanian Dynasty from 224 CE to 651 CE. The Sassanid Empire, which succeeded the Parthian Empire, was recognized as one of the main powers in Western and Central Asia, alongside the Roman-Byzantine Empire, for a period of more than 400 years.

Michael G. Morony,‏ in his book Iraq After the Muslim Conquest (p. 40) states that the star and the crescent were combined for the first time on coins of Khosrau I the twentieth Sassanid Emperor (also called Chosroes I, and Anushirvan  (r. 531–579). Hurmizd IV replaced the six pointed star in some of his coins with a five pointed star. This tradition continued on coins of the seventh century. After the conquest of Iraq the Muslim Government accepted these coins as well. This tradition lasted until 695 or 696, when coins were minted without any images.

https://i0.wp.com/upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/84/Salt_Lake_Assembly_Hall_Star_of_David.jpg/250px-Salt_Lake_Assembly_Hall_Star_of_David.jpg
The Mormon Church Assembly Hall at Temple Square, Salt Lake City


Mormon sun worship of light bearers
Notice the 6 pointed stars above the 5 pointed stars
suggesting the geometrical universe of unity and duality

Mormon Apron
Mormon ceremonial apron


Mormon Church History Building, Salt Lake City


The Mormon “Moon Stones”.
Religions can’t have the male morning star
without the female crescent moon.


Amiens Cathedral, north window, France


St. Mary’s Church, Adderbury


What a lovely snake…


Alistair Crowley
Also known as the “Great Beast 666”
Notice the triangle light rays are in the form of the Seal of Solomon.
Both the 5 and 6 pointed star are revealed here.


Notice here the symbol of two snakes used in
the modern “practice” of the craft of medicine.
Both attorney’s and doctors practice in their craft monopolies.


The Book Of Shadows


Madonna at the Super Bowl – The symbols mean the same thing and
have the same ancient origin. This is no concert. it is a ritual ceremony…
A ceremony to usher in the coming of the merged New World Religion,
including the rebuilding of Solomon’s Temple.


Yeah, she’s a very revealing, classy broad


Terry Richardson – The Star is universal in sacred geometry, as seen below

The Pentagram fits within the star…
the star within the pentagram, ad infinity.
Masonry revolves around Sacred Geometry.


The image of a geometrically perfect star goes on forever,
alternating between upside-down and right-side up.


Ameth is Hebrew for truth.
The Sigil of Dei Ameth (Sigillum Dei Ameth) is used as a Seal of the truth of God.


Washington D.C.


The Oval Office of the White House
As the president enters, he walks under the Sacred Masonic Arch.
Under the arch, a single Fasce hovers over the doorway,
as the rays of the sun shine out from the carpet’s great seal.
The desk – an empty workspace…
for this office is but a staged museum.

–=–


“Whereas the Founding Fathers of this great Nation
and signers of the Constitution, most of whom were Freemasons,
provided a well-rounded basis for developing themselves
and others into valuable citizens of the United States…”

–House Resolution #33, 110th Congress

–=–

The Pentagon in Washington D.C. is a symbol of the 33 degrees of masonry.
Its angles are even at 33 degrees, creating a pentagram with a pentagram in the center.
Designed by John Whiteside Parsons, high priest in the Ordo Templi Orientis,
also called the ‘Order of the Temple of the East’ or ‘Order of Oriental Templars’.
See Eastern Star symbol above, the women’s sect of Masonry.

https://realitybloger.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/f06d1-pentagon.jpg

The mystery of the Pent Alpha!
The mystery of Pentalpha (Pythagarium)


Osiris Pentalpha Lodge #23


The two flags of Masonry

https://realitybloger.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/51f6f-usa2520masonists.gif

https://realitybloger.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/7aef6-gtseal3.jpg


Why is the sacred Seal of Solomon designed with stars on the dollar bill?
Or did you even notice?

https://i2.wp.com/www.whale.to/b/a6gtbeakpentagon.jpghttps://www.freemasonry.bcy.ca/symbolism/rmig_logo.jpg

https://i0.wp.com/rense.com/general32/iaologo.gif
Darpa’s actual logo

–=–

“The Freemasons of the United States have, by tacit consent,
referred to it (the pentagram) as a symbol of the Five Points of Fellowship.
The outlines of the five pointed star are the same as those of the pentalpha or Pythagoras”

Encyclopedia of Freemasonry: Page 358

–=–

-Excerpt-

“William Preston, the eminent Masonic student, scholar, writer, who lived and wrote in the latter part of the eighteenth century, conceived the idea of making the degrees in general, and the Fellowcraft degree in particular, a liberal education! A ‘liberal education’ in those days was comprised within what we still call, after Preston, the ‘seven liberal arts and sciences.’ In those days any mathematics beyond geometry was only for the very, very few. Indeed, mathematics were looked upon as being something not meant for the common men, as being of small use in the world, save for engineers and designers and measurers of land…

Below is a quote that is 1800 years old.

 “…let one of these be that art which prepares the body to be subservient, as a prompt and robust vehicle, to the mandates of the soul, and which is denominated gymnastic. Let another art be that which is the angel of the conceptions of the soul, and which is called rhetoric; another, that which is the nurse and tutor of the juvenile mind, and which is denominated poetry; another that which is the leader of the nature of numbers, and which is called arithmetic; and another that which is the teacher of computation, and is called logistic. Let geometry, also, and music follow, who are the associates of philosophy and conscious of her arcana, and to each of which she distributes a portion of her labour.” —Maximus Tyrius (circa 200 CE) “Dissertation”, xxi, translated by Thomas Taylor(1758-1835)

These differ little from those delineated in later times and would still have great implications when applied in today’s modern world.

H.P.H. Bromwell (1823 -1903) wrote in his massive tome Restorations of Masonic Geometry and Symbolry that: “Although the number of recognized sciences far exceeds seven, yet, giving to that number the benefit of its symbolic meaning, it stands for the whole circle of sciences, whether specifically named among the seven or not.”

We usually associate the seven liberal arts to medieval education curriculum, at this time in Masonic circles the only education available may I suggest that an educated member of a lodge was more useful especially if he could apply geometry to his work….

The 47Th proposition of the first book of Euclid.

The Pythagorean Theorem states that for any right triangle the sum of the squares of its two legs equals the square of its hypotenuse (a2 + b2 = c2). Or we could frame it as the sum of the square of the horizontal and the square of the perpendicular equals the square of the hypotenuse. This is what became known as Euclid’s 47 Proposition… We also know this formulation was known before Pythagoras – there is  evidence in ancient Egyptian work, ancient China (the Chou Pei manuscript), and the megalith builders… This theory, commonly known as the “Pythagorean theorem,” shows that the sum of the squares of the legs of a right triangle is equal to the squares of the hypotenuse or (A X 2) + (B X 2) = (C X 2)… Regardless, it is attributed to Pythagoras and two hundred years later Euclid compiled his “Elements of Mathematics” where this particular 47Th proposition is found in Book One… This theorem has been called the root of all geometry and the cornerstone of mathematics. The practical applications alone are worthy of the high esteem that Masonry affords it. And this is the interpretation of the lecture that is most considered when masons speak of it but the meaning of this hieroglyphical emblem does not stop there… The emblem we are usually presented is the 3,4,5 right triangle in this fashion: The vertical line is of 3 units, the horizontal is of 4 units, and the hypotenuse is of 5 units. Not only is our attention called to this geometrical figure in the Master Mason degree, it is also prominent in the Scottish Rite in the 20th Degree – Master of the Symbolic Lodge and in the 25th Degree – Knight of the Brazen Serpent… Geometry treats of the powers and properties of magnitudes in general, where length, breath, and thickness, are considered, from a point to a line, from a line to a superficies (surface of a body), and from a superficies to a solid… By this science, the architect is enabled to construct his plans, and execute his designs; the general to arrange his soldiers; the engineer to mark out ground for encampments; the geographer to give us the dimensions of the World, and all things within, to delineate the extent of seas, and specify the divisions of empires, kingdoms and provinces; by it, also, the astronomer is enabled to make his observations, and to fix the duration of times and seasons, years and cycles. In fine, geometry is the foundation of architecture, and the root of mathematics.”

“Geometry And Masonry: Sacred Geometry”, by Brother Harvey Lovewell, Lodge Millaa Millaa #351, United Grnd Lodge of Queensland, Au.

-End Excerpt-

For more information on the importance of the ancient liberal arts in education and how it has been purposefully perverted and usurped by today’s “general arts” education for the dumbed down common people, please visit Jan Irvin’s website at:

http://www.triviumeducation.com/

trivium_front_tile

Pay special attention to the “fallacy” links. Learn them and avoid
this most sacred tool of illicit word trickery by the law society – the logical fallacy.

–=–

With the study of Pythagarium, the true building blocks of nature begin to emerge through this sacred geometry, including the Golden Mean (Golden ratio), the Fibionachi series, the Divine Proportion, etc…

This is the beauty and sacred math in all life on Earth.

This is the mathematical perfection of nature.

Some say it is Sacred Geometry.

Some say it’s God.

–=–
The Owl, The Bull, The God
–=–

Eliphas Levi, a nineteenth-century satanist whose works inspired the writings of Albert Pike, the Sovereign Grand Commander of international Freemasonry. Levi enthusiastically reports: The pentagram with two horns in the ascendant represents Satan, or the goat of the Sabbath. (The horn) downward naturally represents the demon, that is, intellectual subversion, disorder and folly.  Esoterically, the star symbolizes man as deity, as the universe embodied. It also stands for Sirius, the “Dog Star” or planet where Satan dwells. It stands for “Thor”, the ancient Nordic God, and it stands for Baal, or Bel, the demonic God so often mentioned in derisive terms in the Old Testament. This same star God was worshiped in Egypt, and the children of Israel, while wandering in the desert, fell under his hypnotic powers. They called him Moloch, Chiun, and Remphan. The prophet Amos castigated the Jewish idolaters for this unholy sacrilege: But ye have borne the tabernacle of your Moloch and Chiun your images, the star of your God, which ye made to yourselves…

owl.jpg (7742 bytes)

Reportedly hanging out on the dollar bill,
Molech is portrayed as the (feminine) owl is hiding in plain sight.
I can neither confirm or deny that this is actually an owl.

However, this short video is helpful in that determination:


But this is the least of our worries regarding Moloch worship…
For Molech was and still is worshiped in the church and state Temples.

A press club in government (Washington D.C.)? An owl (Molech),
Aladdin’s Lamp, and emanating sun rays upon its “seal”?


Bohemian Grove, the origin of the National Press Club.


“Weaving spiders come not here”.

–=–

Moloch, Molech, Molekh, Molok, Molek,
Molock, Moloc, Melech, Milcom or Molcom

“Originally a Canaanite god to whom human sacrifices were offered.”

“Later, he was a general symbol of authorities that corrupt
or destroy humans, especially inhuman political systems”

The Continuum Encyclopedia of Symbols (2000 Edition),Udo Becker: –

–=–

Moloch (מלך m-l-k, “king”) is the name of an ancient Ammonite god. Moloch worship was practiced by the Canaanites, Phoenicians, other North African cultures and the Levant (Arabic: بلاد الشام‎ Bilād ash-Shām or المشرق العربي al-Mashrīq al-‘Arabiyy; Hebrew: כְּנָעַן Kənáʿan). It involved child sacrafice by the parents of said children by fire as payment to the idol statue. In the Old Testament, Gehenna was a valley by Jerusalem, where apostate Israelites and followers of various Baalim and Caananite gods, including Moloch, sacrificed their children by fire (2 Chr. 28:3, 33:6; Jer. 7:31, 19:2–6).

–=–

 “And thou shalt not let any of thy seed pass through the fire to Moloch”.

–Leviticus 18:21

–=–

“Then did Solomon build a high place for Chemosh, the abomination of Moab,
in the hill that is before Jerusalem, and lmlk, the abomination of the Sons of Ammon.”

–1 Kings 11:7

–=–

“Moreover he burnt incense in the valley of the son of Hinnom,
and burnt his children in the fire, after the abominations of the heathen
whom the LORD had cast out before the children of Israel.”

–2 Chronicles 28:3

–=–

“But ye have borne the tabernacle of your Moloch and Chiun your images,
the star of your god, which ye made to yourselves.

-Amos 5:26 (KJB)

–=–

“Yea, ye took up the tabernacle of Moloch, and the star of your god Remphan,
figures which ye made to worship them: and I will carry you away beyond Babylon.

–Acts 7:43

–=–

The Tabernacle (Hebrew: משכן‎, mishkan, meaning “residence”, “house”, or “dwelling place”), according to the Hebrew Bible, was the portable dwelling place for the divine presence from the time of the Exodus from Egypt through the conquering of the land of Canaan. Built to specifications revealed by God (Yahweh) to Moses at Mount Sinai, it accompanied the Israelites on their wanderings in the wilderness and their conquest of the Promised Land. The First Temple (of Solomon) in Jerusalem superseded it as the dwelling-place of God. There is no mention of the Tabernacle in the Tanakh after the destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple by the Babylonians in 587 BCE.

The fullest description of the Tabernacle describes an inner shrine (named Holy of Holies) housing the Ark of the Covenant and an outer chamber (Holy Place) with a golden lampstand (for the menorah), table for showbread (Bread of Presence – cakes or loaves of bread which were always present on a specially dedicated table in the Temple of Jerusalem as an offering to “God”), and an alter of incense. Many scholars contend that the description reflects the structure of the Temple of Solomon, while some hold that the description derives from memories of a real pre-monarchic shrine, perhaps the sanctuary at Shiloh. Traditional scholars contend that it describes an actual tabernacle used in the time of Moses and thereafter.

Depiction of the Menorah on the Arch of Titus in Rome,
being carried with the portable Tabernacle (Divine Presence of God).

–=–

“Again, you shall say to the Sons of Israel: Whoever he be of the Sons of Israel or of the strangers that sojourn in Israel, that gives any of his seed l’Molech; he shall surely be put to death: the people of the land shall stone him with stones. And I will set my face against that man and will cut him off from among his people; because he has given of his seed l’Molech, to defile my sanctuary, and to profane my holy name. And if the people of the land do at all hide their eyes from that man, when he gives of his seed l’Molech, and do not kill him, then I will set my face against that man, and against his family, and will cut him off, and all that go astray after him, whoring l’Molech from among the people.”

–Leviticus 20:2-5

–=–

“And he defiled the Tophet, which is in the valley of Ben-hinnom,
that no man might make his son or his daughter pass through the fire l’Molech.”

–2 Kings 23:10

–=–

“And they built the high places of the Ba‘al, which are in the valley of Ben-hinnom,
to cause their sons and their daughters to pass through the fire l’Molech;
which I did not command them, nor did it come into my mind
that they should do this abomination, to cause Judah to sin.”

–Jeremiah 32:35

–=–

It is ironic that the Bible is deemed extremely violent in such chapters as Leviticus, turning many away from its lessons and warnings. And yet, such violence stems from literally destroying those who would worship Satan and sacrifice children to him and other deities in the tabernacles, idols, and in the Temples of Solomon. And today, as the Temple is being planned and rebuilt and as the laws are changed to allow animal “sacrifice” in the Temple, as World War 3 is being spoken about openly as a racially cloaked religious war, these violent pages in the Bible are completely lost on the population of today as they head into the new age without knowledge and without the dignity to fight this ancient foe. This is the regression of humanity into the darkest of new ages…

And I honestly wonder how many parents out there would say no to human sacrifice – and how many would defend their children to the death? I honestly fear not nearly enough.

The 12th-century Rashi, commenting on Jeremiah 7:31, stated:

“Tophet is Moloch, which was made of brass; and they heated him from his lower parts; and his hands being stretched out, and made hot, they put the child between his hands, and it was burnt; when it vehemently cried out; but the priests beat a drum, that the father might not hear the voice of his son, and his heart might not be moved.”

A rabbinical tradition attributed to the Yalkout of Rabbi Simeon, explains that the idol was hollow and was divided into seven compartments, in one of which they put flour, in the second turtle-doves, in the third a ewe, in the fourth a ram, in the fifth a calf, in the sixth an ox, and in the seventh a child, which were all burned together by heating the statue inside.

Molech is rarely depicted as an owl, which represents the feminine aspect of the god. It’s dominant male persona is generally the bull-headed man.

–=–

A father sacrificing his own son…

(“Der Götze Moloch” i.e. The Idol Moloch).
An 18th-century German illustration of Moloch
with sacrificial ovens built in.


The Flight of Moloch, watercolour, 1809.
Illustration by William Blake for John Milton’s
poem entitled: “On The Morning Of Christ’s Nativity

In Milton’s “Nativity” poem, Molech is listed among the chiefs of Satan’s fallen angels in Book I, and is given a speech at the parliament of Hell in Book 2:43 – 105, where he argues for immediate warfare against God. He later becomes revered as a pagan god on Earth.

–=–

Baphomet – male and female,
sun and moon
Other male/female dualities in gods,
a balancing of the generative energies.


Map of the location of the Capital Building (Legislature) in Washington D.C.


The “Congress Building” literally sits inside the belly of the god (beast) Molech.


George Bush Jr. – the greatest bloodline pretender, ever

–=–

“I tell people all the time, you’re equally American if you’re a Christian, Jew, or Muslim.
You’re equally American if you believe in an Almighty or
don’t believe in an Almighty. That’s a sacred freedom.”

–George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Mar. 10, 2006

–=–

“I trust God speaks through me. Without that, I couldn’t do my job.”

–George W. Bush, during a campaign visit to Amish community,
Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, Jul. 9, 2004

–=–

“I couldn’t imagine somebody like Osama bin Laden
understanding the joy of Hanukkah.”

–George W. Bush, White House, Dec. 10, 2007.

–=–

“We have a calling from beyond the stars to stand for freedom,
and America will always be faithful to that cause.”

–George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Jan. 19, 2005

–=–

“All of you — all in this generation of our military —
have taken up the highest calling of history.
You’re defending your country, and protecting the innocent from harm.
And wherever you go, you carry a message of hope —
a message that is ancient and ever new. In the words of the prophet Isaiah,
“To the captives, ‘come out,’ — and to those in darkness, ‘be free’. “

–George W. Bush, Aboard the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln,
a couple of miles away from San Diego May 1, 2003

–=–
More Answers Revealed
–=–

Q: Lodge: When is it said to be Just?

A: When furnished with the Great Lights.

Q: Lodge: When is it said to be Perfect?

A: When it contains the constitutional numbers of members.

Q: Lodge: When is it said to be Regular?

A: When working under Charter, legally authorized.

Q: Lodges of the World: What is the connecting bond between them?

A: Lawful Authority. No Lodge can exist and work without authority.

Q: Solar metal: What is it?

A: Gold.

https://realitybloger.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/5a401-mahatma-gandhi-quote-1.jpgThe Goyim can be made to covet anything.
For gold is the destroyer of nations and men…

Q: Freemasonry: What is the earliest mention made of it?

A: John Moore came from England to South Carolina in 1680. A letter written by him in 1715 says he spent a few evenings with Masonic Brothers.

Q: Who were Modern Masons?

A: Supporters of the Grand Lodge of England.

Q: Who were Ancient Masons?

A: The Irish Masons who formed a rival Grand Lodge in London.

Q: Were these rival Grand Lodges represented in America?

A: Yes. The Ancients became popular and organized in Massachusetts, New York, Pennsylvania, Virginia, South Carolina, where they worked as “Ancient York Lodges.”

Q: What effect did they have on American Masonry?

A: Dissensions arose between the Ancients and Moderns.

Q: What year was a reconciliation effected between the two Grand Lodges in England?

A: 1813.

Q: Was a similar union consummated in America?

A: Yes. The two Grand Lodges of South Carolina were the last Grand Lodges to unite in 1817 and the distinction between Ancients and Moderns was abolished.

Q: What was the attitude of the Colonial Lodges toward the Revolution?

A: The Ancients favored the Colonies. The Moderns, the Crown.

Q: What State adheres to the Ancients?

A: Pennsylvania.

Q: What State has the greatest number of Lodges?

A: Texas.

Q: Washington: Did he ever hold the office of Grand Master?

A: While the army for independence was encamped at winter quarters (1779) in Morristown, New Jersey, he was unanimously elected the Grand Master of Masons of the American Colonies but due to the war and the upset conditions at the time he never did serve, but in the hearts of American Masons he was considered the first and only Grand Master of American Freemasons, and was at that time considered the most eminent Mason of his time, evidenced by the unanimous vote cast for him to become Grand Master of the Grand Lodge of American Freemasons.

–=–
Fin
–=–

This brings us to the end of part 2 of this essay series. In my final writing, we will read over the constitution with a fine-toothed comb, removing any semblance of rose-colored glasses, and tear that compact apart, article by article, right by right. The theocracy is now come out into the open; a Masonic guild of ecclesiastical law and enforcement ruled by blood. And this journey is nearing its end. The question is, what are you going to do with this knowledge now?

For the truth and only the truth can indeed set you free.

And hope is all that stands in the way of action.

All ye who enter here abandon hope, for without it, ye are a reckoning force. With it, ye are as a docile lamb at the slaughter.

.

–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Tuesday, August 13th, 2013

Cracking The Cult Of The Constitution (Part I)


–=–
CRACKING THE CULT OF THE CONSTITUTION
A three-part essay by: Clint Richardson
–=–

Introduction: The following essay series will be very challenging and controversial for all who read. It is not that the information itself is actually controversial. Instead, the difficulty for most readers is in searching the soul and personally recognizing that the true controversy lies within the individual; a battle of cognitive dissonance where the ego continuously clashes with the true and reasonable self – the natural being grasping for truth. It is a fight between our indoctrinated beliefs and the hard facts and realities that challenge them, causing emotional barriers and fallacy which unhappily overcome comprehension, logic, and reason.

Presented below and in two future parts are facts and images that will challenge the very core of your belief system, from religion to politics, and most importantly to the very founding of this illusion we call the nation and constitution of the United States. For those who have eyes to see, I present this three-part chronicle and true history of the hidden hand that rules through blood, word magic, trickery and deceit – the elicit and eminent powers that be.

Part 1, entitled “Laying The Cornerstone”, covers recent history and the current state of the constitution of the United States, its congressional suspension according to legislative decree, and the powers of the Executive Branch totally outside of and over that constitution through declared national emergency and military rule, as approved by congress (the People) and under the “Lieber Code”. Believing that the constitution still applies as a restriction to government is the greatest hurdle for us to overcome, for this blinding belief blurs reality. The greatest elicit word trickery of the constitution was to make its unconstitutional use constitutional – to exempt government from the law. The question of whether or not this was and is a Christian nation founded by Christian men will also be questioned, as well as the theocratic nature of that Masonic municipal temple called Washington D.C. And the word “oath” will be exposed for what it truly is – a religious pledge to artificial corporate things and never to the actual living people (citizens) of the nation.

Part 2, entitled “Squaring Our History“, will further reveal the ancient Masonic rite of the sacred mystery religions, explore further the oath (holy sacrament), and look at many of the “constitutions” that through the church Masonry has created in the past. Why are certain words capitalized in the constitution? The answer is obvious once this Masonic writing style is examined. We will continue with a shocking and astounding pictorial history that showcases what has been the true power of all governments for thousands of years; never of or actually by the consent of the governed people, but of the Masonic Deistic Rite and its self-declared divine bloodline right to rule. The signs and symbols are everywhere, right before your very eyes, and yet you’ve likely never noticed them before. With a new understanding of just what authority is and where such “eminence” comes from, you will never look at government or its “ecclesiastical” civil doctrine the same.

Part 3, entitled “Compassing The Constitution“, will be a thorough walk-through of the Masonic legal writings of that non-Christian document without the benefit of emotion, false belief, or rose colored glasses – exposing the many fallacies that have become belief in America: the religion-based cult-ure of the constitution. As if reading the constitution for the first time, its true nature and meaning is revealed for the Masonic document it is, leaving no word undefined. And finally with this understanding the question is posed: Would you really sign and be bound by the constitution if it were a private contract?

–=–

In this first chapter, we will barely be scraping the surface of the hidden hand that rules. Instead, we must disseminate the legal foundation of the United States through defined words and statutes. And only when we understand our current state of government and its blatantly  mandated congressional suspension of the constitution before most of us were even born can we then look back to see this was the Masonic plan all along – the true purpose of the founding of the United States.

Please be aware that the concepts of God, gods, the Bible, corporate churches, and the doctrines of religious and other “societies” will be discussed in this presentation. I do not offer my own religious opinion here, and instead only attempt to logically and reasonably decipher how religions are used to righteously and more importantly violently govern the people. In other words, I will be committing the cardinal sin of asking questions – of challenging the rite and the right of the church’s dogma to govern the people, including the Deistic Masonic empire of the Untied States. Each person who reads this will have different levels of understandings, beliefs, emotions, and knowledge about these subjects. They are included herein not for the purposes of debate or persuasion of faith or doctrine, but because they are and always have been the foundation of all governments in world history, including the United States, where the “sovereign” Rulers, Kings, Queens and Officials derive their powers and authority from some form of church and its doctrine, claiming to act as or by whatever god they invoke as the “anointed” head of that church. For the purposes of this essay, your personal belief and faith or lack of it is irrelevant to the context of what is disclosed, for knowledge needs not belief. And clearly religion and the institution of the corporate church cannot be ignored in the history of all past and powerful world governments. It is the true hidden beliefs and faith of those who claim god-like powers in church and state we are to be concerned with here, not your own. The fallacious comparison of the “people” as members of the church or nation has nothing to do with the leadership positions of power and authority within those corporate entities – who claim governmental authority over those members (the people) through “god”. Instead of these doctrine and faith-based hangups, I disclaim here that for the purposes of this presentation, the word God (as capitalized) should be translated to mean the word nature, for God would be the creator of everything in nature if He indeed exists. With this understanding, we can easily see and prove that government is diametrically opposed to nature, natural law, and especially the natural rights of the natural people; and thus by default is actually opposed to God and God’s laws of nature.

Somewhere along the line, be it purposeful or not, a fundamental misunderstanding was promoted by the corporate religious doctrines of government that places mankind above God’s nature and natural law as its dominatrix with an irresponsible domination (dominion) over the earth, as opposed to acting as its steward and caretaker; giving rise to the entire religious corporate machine that violates nature at every turn; pumping dry its blood, tainting its life-affirming waters with pollution and poison, disrespecting and incrementally obliterating most of its lifeforms, and altering its function and landscape to the point that said “Creator” would not today recognize His own creation. This promoted doctrine of those who care more for the after-life than for theirs and others (the people’s) natural life here on Earth makes the church a poor candidate to govern the earth we all live upon and depend on for our natural lives, rights, and delicate balance of resources.

Thus the readers ego and righteousness, if possible, should be laid aside before continuing for the purposes of absorbing knowledge – so as to see the world without filters…

For those who would prematurely dismiss the absolute domination and importance of religion (the church) and Ecclesiastical law within our United States government, or for that matter any and all governments around the world, you of all people should read the following information, which proves that this Ecclesiastical legal doctrine is the only governmental law that actually exists. For your belief or non-belief matters about zero percent as to what is the foundation and “authority” of law.

I recommend, due to the length and importance of the following information, images, and future parts, that you copy and paste this essay for safe keeping. This is a free, un-copyrighted, educational endeavor that may be shared and re-posted for educational purposes. Please feel free to turn it into a (free/non-profit) documentary movie or other alternative media venture. No permission is needed from myself.

–Clint Richardson

———————————————————————————–
Part 1: Laying The Cornerstone
———————————————————————————–

–=–

“Knowledge makes a man unfit to be a slave.”

–Frederick Douglass–

–=–

I believe the above quote to be a self-evident truth…

Inversely, I find it self-evident that belief is the opposite of knowledge, and that some slaves believe themselves to be free – a people indentured and destroyed by nothing more or less than their lack of knowledge mixed with a belief in government-granted liberty as the source of their God-given natural rights.

Unfortunately it seems that most “citizens” in the United States have no knowledge of their own place in this indentured society, or that they are unilaterally indebted to it. Most minds are harvested before they can read or write into de facto (illegitimate) contractual servitude called “citizenship” to the United States – a compact entered into before the age of reason and consent – reenforced via adult  “Selective Service” registration as government cannon fodder and chattel at the whim of a president’s pen. And America sits as a lady in waiting, plastered over in ink on paper; a land hidden by corporatism.

Meanwhile, a plague of manufactured history is spread over the true nature and founding of that United States central government; a false, fabled paradigm inbred and instilled from birth and throughout the education system, sponsored and even required by the very government who wishes to keep its true disposition a secret.

It is the purpose of this multi-part research project to show conclusively the true hidden foundation (Cornerstone) of the United States, who the “People, in Order” of so-called “Founding Fathers” really were, and exactly what the “constitution” is. For all we have learned is nothing if not the provided doctrine and entertainment of a ruling class in that government that absolutely depends on the non-dissemination of the nation’s true history and origin.

Enter-tain-ment is defined from its Latin origins as “to enter (enter) and hold (tain) the mind (mentis)”.

And the word govern-ment?

Latin Word for Mind Control

–=–

“Wars in old times were made to get slaves.
The modern implement of imposing slavery is debt.”

–Ezra Pound

–=–

Today, the entire world has been enslaved by imposed government (public) debt, a requirement of “citizens” in the many international debt-slave colonies called “countries”.

It is imperative to comprehend what the “founding fathers” that created this govern-ment via their constitution believed through their own writings and associations, not your own. For it was their belief system and their “Fraternal Brotherhood” of Freemasonry that created this union, not yours. They were “the People” (capitalized in the constitution as a proper noun), not you and I as “the common people”.

I realize that this is a bold statement; and thanks to entertainment and history (His – Story), one worth reasonable doubt until proven. This goal is the purpose of the following information and the very long  journey that led me here to piece it all together.

Today I challenge the great American fallacy called patriotism that governs the minds of the controlled citizenry. I challenge the very nature of this central government and its right to claim religious eminence and dominion over an otherwise free people. I challenge its Army, its Navy, its Air Force, its Marines, and its Maritime international corporate flag. I challenge its FBI, its CIA, its IRS, and all of its de facto (illegitimate) Executive Cabinet departments (none of which are elected by the American people) that, through Executive military authority (permission) supposedly granted by the very people for whom it enslaves, enforces the laws created by that government. And I challenge the certainly unfounded belief by the masses of people who live under that power of authority supposedly granted by the constitution of the United States to give license to that government the authority (permission) to hold, harm, extort, rape, and kill any man, woman, or child, both foreign and domestic. For a piece of paper has not a human mind or voice to grant anything.

–=–

Nationalism is the propagandist key to maintain govern-ment.
Enter-tain-ment is essential to hide the reality of govern-ment
and to promote the fallacy of Nationalism.

–=–

Without faithful believers in its legitimacy, any cult must surely perish…

And without voluntary citizens as military soldiers, government’s legal codes and authority diminish absent that violent force of blind obedience to back up forcefully its necessarily tyrannical laws. For law is only as corrupt as the men who have license to practice and especially enforce that law, those who do so under the guise of God’s name – IN GOD WE TRUST. Of course, it goes without saying that government wishes its ground troops to be as void of knowledge as possible, snatching their enlisted straight out of low income high schools – paying for their indoctrination within its own universities – an education system purposefully dumbed down and lacking true knowledge and independence so as to create such potential unthinking soldiers without knowledge, opportunity, or choice.

And so today I seek to lift your own veil, if you will permit the revolution of your mind over its righteous state of enshrined belief. For it is my intent to break the people of America free from this mindless, self-destructive Cult of the Constitution.

–=–
Patriotism:
The Arrogance Of Ignorance
–=–

In America, our distorted history makes our people literally worship the United States Flag (a slightly altered corporate symbol of the former East India Company) while turning their backs on the natural lands of America. The people then thoughtlessly Pledge Allegiance to that corporate flag by reciting a poem written by a proclaimed socialist. Many even attend sports games in Roman style coliseums and, with no understanding of the origins of their hand over heart gesture, sing a nationalist praise before every game to the flag of the tyrannical govern-ment that enslaves them through debt contract.

As our first example of how the absolutely fictitious national beliefs by the people have created a mass cultural psychosis of fallacy within our American culture (cult-ure), due simply to a lack of historical knowledge, lets examine the true origins of this supposed American classic…

Have you ever asked yourself: Why do I pledge allegiance, and to what exactly do I blindly pledge it?

Does an inanimate object (idol) such as a Flag really need or care about your devotion to it?

Perhaps it’s time to uncover and expose this history…

https://i.chzbgr.com/maxW500/2146823424/hF1EAB211/
American Flag vs. British East India Company Flag

–=–

“Music written by Brother John Stafford Smith (1750-1836)
of Inverness Lodge #4 in London was, at one time, used
by an Irish Masonic Orphans’ Home as their song. 
Later it became a popular drinking song for many years
known as To Anacreon in Heaven. Then, some years later,
the music was adopted by Francis Scott Key to which he wrote
the words to our National Anthem,  The Star Spangled Banner.”

–‘The Truth is Stranger than Fiction’, by Alphonse Cerza,
Masonic Service Association, 1967.

–=–

File:Anacreon monte calvo.jpg
Anacreon singing his poetry

Anacreon (Greek: Ἀνακρέων, gen.: Ἀνακρέοντος) (582 BC – 485 BC)
a Greek lyric poet, notable for his drinking songs and hymns.
Later Greeks included him in the canonical list of nine lyric poets.

–=–

https://i0.wp.com/nyhistoric.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Francis-Bellamy1.jpg

Bellamy

https://i1.wp.com/blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/files/2012/06/american-school-children-bellamy-salute.jpg

https://i0.wp.com/www.maureenmegowan.com/Repository/1/4/2/1/0/3/142103/d1f58975-dbc7-4b71-8635-cdb3c95cb0ad.jpg


The original Pledge of Allegiance printed in the “Official Programme” circa 1892
**Notice here the capitalized words “Flag, Republic, Nation, Liberty, and Justice”.
This is the classic Masonic writing style (capitalization). More on this in Part 2.

https://realitybloger.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/6008b-bellamy_salute_1915.jpg

Below we see the incremental stage between the change over to a hand over heart gesture… It is actually quite humorous to be conditioned to actually think that placing our hand over our heart is any less significant or strange than placing our stiff-arms in the air, communist-style.

And then there are the unfounded beliefs:

https://i2.wp.com/24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ltl3ylgnB01r2mleno1_400.jpg

Compared to the true knowledge:

https://i0.wp.com/25.media.tumblr.com/f72f0c811c9eb2f128bb9926cb17182c/tumblr_mly931DPBD1r1vqpco1_500.png

–=–
Pledge, Or Else…
–=–

In the case of West Virginia State Board Of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 (1943), we read that this pledge of stiff-armed allegiance was not simply a choice by our children, but instead a requirement punishable by expulsion from the school system for “insubordination” in true communist fashion:

“The Board of Education on January 9, 1942, adopted a resolution containing recitals taken largely from the Court’s Gobitis opinion and ordering that the salute to the flag become ‘a regular part of the program of activities in the public schools,’ that all teachers and pupils ‘shall be required to participate in the salute honoring the Nation represented by the Flag; provided, however, that refusal to salute the Flag be regarded as an Act of insubordination, and shall be dealt with accordingly.’ [319 U.S. 624, 627]  The resolution originally required the ‘commonly accepted salute to the Flag‘ which it defined. Objections to the salute as ‘being too much like Hitler’s’ were raised by the Parent and Teachers Association, the Boy and Girl [319 U.S. 624, 628]  Scouts, the Red Cross, and the Federation of Women’s Clubs. Some modification appears to have been made in deference to these objections, but no concession was made to Jehovah’s Witnesses. What is now required is the ‘stiff-arm’ salute, the saluter to keep the right hand raised with palm turned up while the following is repeated: ‘I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of [319 U.S. 624, 629]  America and to the Republic for which it stands; one Nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.'”

(***Notice that the word “God” is not included in the Pledge within this ruling, as the words “under God” were not added until 11 years after this court case, in the year 1953.)

Failure to conform is ‘insubordination’ dealt with by expulsion. Readmission is denied by statute until compliance. Meanwhile the expelled child is ‘unlawfully absent‘ and may be proceeded against as a delinquent. His parents or guardians are liable to prosecution, and if convicted are subject to fine not exceeding $50 and jail term not exceeding thirty days.”

–=–

Now, does this requirement to say an oath to the United States flag sound like patriotism to you… or communism?

Listen to what this royal bloodline cousin of kings and presidents had to say:

“…at a meeting of Boy Scouts, presided over by the veteran founder of that organization, Colonel Dan Beard, the writer heard the thousand or more, standing at attention, shout “I pledge allegiance to my flag” and the rest of the words. In answer to his questions, Colonel Beard said: “Why, that’s said by the Boy Scouts every time they have a roundup, big or littleand for that matter, by the Pioneer Girls and the Campfire Girls too. It’s the A B C of training for citizenship. It was adopted from the public schools when the Scouts first started in 1905 — they didn’t have to learn it; it’s their regular hurrah for flag and country. I’ve heard it for nearly twenty years, from the top of Michigan to the toe of Florida, and from Montana back to New York again. The youngsters of every race say it and it makes Americans of them.”

(Source: University of Rochester Dept. of Education, http://www.lib.rochester.edu/index.cfm?PAGE=3418)

What makes a child an American? Is it natural birthright (being natural-born)? Is it naturalization? Is it blood?

No, it is their pledge (oath) to a corporate flag as good little citizen soldiers…

The Wehrmacht Oath of Loyalty to Adolf Hitler, 2 August 1934, was pledged:

“I swear by God this sacred oath that to the Leader of the German empire and people, Adolf Hitler, supreme commander of the armed forces, I shall render unconditional obedience and that as a brave soldier I shall at all times be prepared to give my life for this oath.”

The current oath of enlisted soldiers of the United States also pledges:

“I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.” (Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5 October 1962).

–=–

Notice that these oaths by Nazi and U.S. military soldiers are not to protect the common people within the nation (whom in the United States are referred to as possible domestic “enemies of the State” in the “Trading With The Enemies Act”). Instead, these oaths only swear (or affirm in the U.S) to protect the United States government, its president, and its officers. This is an oath to protect the continuity of government against you, whoever you are; all 7 billion of you on Earth and including all U.S. citizens…

The constitution is the foundation of government, so allegiance to that piece of paper (charter) – as with worshiping its flag – is not allegiance in any way to the actual living, breathing, common people. The constitution did not create the people. The people were here long before the constitution. Creation is an act of God and/or nature, and the people of course existed long before the language of the constitution was created by men of a certain blood. The constitution in fact created govern-ment (control) of those people (men) who were first created of nature (God), creating in them each an artificial person. In other words, the constitution is not of nature (not created naturally), and is actually against nature and against the Bible (more on this later). The president is also but an office held by a government person (Corporation Sole) as designated by the constitution. And the enemies are not enemies of the people, but enemies against the continuity of government (control) of the people as a body politic and its corporate world-wide monopolies – including citizens and non-citizens (all natural people). Thus these United States oaths taken by military men and women are to protect artificial constructs, not real people. These are strawman oaths in that they are pledges to artificial persons and things.

–=–
A False Oath To The
Incorporation
Of Souls
–=–

What is the purpose of becoming a Corporation Sole?

The first known Corporation Sole (to my current knowledge) was established by the Church of England in the year 1448. It is always and can only be legitimately established under an Ecclesiastical (religious law) body within its proper form.

Ecclesiastical Law was called the “Cannons of the Church” – a play on words so as to not actually use the word “law”. These “Canons” were essentially the forced adherence of the people by the State to matters of religious conscious by law (Canon). In other words, mind control. In order to guarantee that the ownership of real property was continued to be held by the Church outside of the control of the State, the concept of “Corporation Sole” was created as a legal fictional (artificial) person of the Church – a spiritual assembly, if you will. In the end, these Corporations Sole represent eternal life in an artificial legal capacity. In other words, the office for which the Corporation Sole creates is passed from living man to living man (or woman), who then becomes the Sole fiction of that office. The real property and political (ecclesiastical) powers are transferred or “conveyed” with the Corporation Sole to the new officer (soul).

Sound confusing? Well it’s supposed to. For you are not supposed to be a party to or have even a basic knowledge of this common law elitist privilege.

In a way, since the Corporation Sole has no need of a board of directors or other typical corporate charter requirements, you could say that this incorporation creates a “Sovereignty” – a dictatorship of one. It is called a Corporation “Sole” in reverence to the sole individual “soul” who fills the corporation.

The “Queen of England” as an office is a Corporation Sole overseen by the sole officer (the current living Queen), and its ministry is the government/church of England who allowed its creation within Ecclesiastical law. Many of the “Secretaries of State” in England are also individual Corporations Sole. The office of British Monarch in each Commonwealth Realm is also an individual and separate Corporation Sole. Thus, each time the Queen travels to one of her Commonwealth countries, she is doing so as a separate and unique officer (Corporation Sole) in each country – and is all but immune to that countries statutory base of legislative or parliamentary laws. For instance, in general and while in England, Queen Elizabeth II is the artificial person (Corporation Sole) named “Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the United Kingdom”. Remember, this is the name of her corporation. But when governing (controlling) the Commonwealth of Canada, she takes the corporate role of “Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada” – a completely separate Corporation Sole. In Australia she is “Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Australia”. Again, these are all separate individual Corporations Sole.

Interestingly, because both Canada and Australia are politically established as “Federal” governments, the Queen also has individually distinct Corporations Sole for each “Province” of those two countries. When dealing specifically with the local government in Alberta, Canada, she switches corporate hats once again and becomes “Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Alberta”, and again for every other Province thereof. And when the Queen dies or advocates her throne, she will simply sign over here many Corporations Sole and all the “Rights” of real property (including whole continents) to the next bloodline Monarch (man or woman) in succession, likely her eldest  son.

A Bishop in the Vatican (Church of Rome) is also acting as a Corporation Sole, where the current office of Bishop is the sole officer and its ministry is the Church of Rome. The office of “The Arch Bishop of Canterbury” is also an individual Corporation Sole of the Church. And of course the many Catholic Churches spread across the nations are also in utilization of Corporations Sole.

The Office (corporation) of the “The Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Later-day Saints” is also a Corporation Sole, where the office of the President is the sole officer and its ministry (people) is The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. And this explains a lot… like why for so many years I could never find a Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) for the “Mormon Church” corporation and its corporate holdings. For a Corporation Sole is not required to follow the Statutes that require such financial disclosure and auditing as other incorporated entities are!

Cities, districts, counties, and states, as well as the Federal government and its agencies are not Corporations Sole. They are bound by Statutory laws and must file a CAFR (independently audited “annual financial report”) and represent a multi-faceted “body politic” in their incorporation and are not of a “church”. Microsoft and Apple Corporations are also not Corporations Sole, for all of these have more than one person (i.e. president, vice-president, secretary, etc.).

But most importantly, this does not necessarily preclude the fact that the individual officers, including Bill Gates and the presidents of the United States, CEO’s, and political officers (legislators) of corporations and governments themselves are not individually acting under their own Corporation Sole instead of as real people (mankind).

In the United States today, the legal status called Corporation Sole is completely tax-exempt, is exclusively under common law (immune from laws called “statute”), and is recognized by all 50 states as such. It has to be, you see, or else states would not be able to recognize their own representatives who are acting under this capacity as individual Corporations Sole (representatives). You might say that this makes politicians immune from their own created laws (statutes). Like me, you may have often wondered why those in government get away with literal murder and organized crime under the “color” of office under the United States.

Now you know…

A Corporation Sole is perhaps best understood as an “unincorporated corporation”, where an individual (no employees) is the only person involved, making all decisions for the Corporation Sole without opposition, and having no corporate bylaws required (which are statutory and not requirements of or in the common law). By unincorporated I mean to say that the Corporation Sole is not officially a legal status granted by government, but instead one granted by an Ecclesiastical church/religion. Though its roots are steeped in antiquity, the Corporation Sole has ecclesiastically been used by the higher members of the church (government) for many centuries. The Pope, his Cardinals, and his Bishops are all individual Corporations Sole. The Royal Family and their representatives such as Prime Ministers are also individual Corporations Sole. And entities in United States politics such as “President Obama”, “Representative Ron Paul”, Governors, and other congressmen and the Vice President and Cabinet Heads are also individual Corporations Sole. They are acting under an Ecclesiastical (religion-based) office, which is for all intents and purposes immune to government’s legal Codes – the laws which they help to create for the rest of the “people”.

Ron Paul, for instance, is listed as a traded corporation on Dunn & Bradstreet (DNB.com) under these business listings:

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, UNITED STATES
Also Traded as RON PAUL
203 CANNON HOUSE OFC BLDG, WASHINGTON, DC

CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES
Also Traded as RON PAUL
203 CANNON HOUSE BUILDING, WASHINGTON, DC

Link–>http://creditreports.dnb.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/IballValidationCmd?storeId=11154&catalogId=71154&searchType=BSF&busName=ron%20paul&state=DC&country=US&cm_mmc=dnb-_-home-_-retail-_-lookup_-topbar#goTop

These are the Corporations Sole for Ron Paul.

How about the President of the United States?

EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT
Also Traded as BARACK H OBAMA
725 17TH ST NW, WASHINGTON, DC

Ok. Here is the corporation that is the Office of the President, but what about Obama himself as a “Sole”?

OBAMA, BARRACK HUSSEIN
1600 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW, WASHINGTON, DC

Link–>http://creditreports.dnb.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/IballValidationCmd?storeId=11154&catalogId=71154&searchType=BSF&busName=president%20obama&state=DC&country=US&cm_mmc=dnb-_-home-_-retail-_-lookup_-topbar#goTop

It is important to note that if we check back here in 2017 after the next presidential election, this corporation known as “EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT” will then read to be “Also Traded as _____ __ _______”. In other words, it will be traded as whomever the next president as Corporation Sole will be when the office is passed in succession by Obama to his cousin and bloodline successor.

After all, a man cannot be “traded”. That would be slavery.

But the artificial person (Corporation Sole) is not a man – it is a thing.

For further understanding, let’s read from Black’s Law 1st. edition:

CORPORATION SOLE. A corporation consisting of one person only, and his successors in some particular station, who are incorporated by law in order to give them some legal capacities and advantages, particularly that of perpetuity, which in their natural persons they could not have had. In this sense, the sovereign in England is a sole corporation, so is a bishop, so are some deans distinct from their several chapters, and so is every parson and vicar. A corporation sole consists of a single person, who is made a body corporate and politic, in order to give him some legal capacities and advantages, and especially that of perpetuity; as a bishop, dean, etc.

Black’s 5th Edition states:

Corporation sole. Unusual type of corporation consisting of only one person whose successor becomes the corporation on his death or resignation; limited in the main today to bishops and heads of dioceses.”

And we can read from the Massachusetts Supreme Court, in the case of “The Overseers of the Poor of the City of Boston v. David Sears 39 Mass (2Pick) 122 at 128 (1839)”:

“…the distinction between an aggregate and sole corporation, growing out of the different modes of constitution and forms of action, is striking and obvious. A bishop or parsons acting in a corporate capacity and holding property to him and his successor in right of office, has no need of a corporate name, he performs all legal acts under his own seal, in his own name and name of office; his own will alone regulates his acts, needs no treasurer, for he has no personal property except the rents and proceeds for the corporate estate, and these he takes to his own use when received. By-laws are unnecessary, for he regulates his own action, by his own will and judgment, like any other individual acting in his own right. These examples are sufficient to clarify the legal distinctions between the two classes of corporations.”

The question we should be asking is this: If a Corporation Sole is religious or “ecclesiastical” in origin, how is a government that promotes separation of church and state – a government supposedly without a declared central religion – able to form such religious Corporations Sole?

Is there a hidden or “Mystery” religion from which this ability to Ecclesiastically incorporate originates within said United States corporation?

The answer to that question represents the thesis put forward in this essay series; to uncover and prove a theocracy where one seemingly and supposedly does not exist…

–=–

Religion:

Man’s relation to Divinity, to reverence, worship, obedience, and submission to mandates and precepts of supernatural or superior beings. In its broadest sense includes all forms of belief in the existence of superior beings exercising power over human beings by volition, imposing rules of conduct, with future rewards and punishments. Bond uniting man to GOD, and a virtue whose purpose is to render GOD worship due him as source of all being and principle of all government of things

Nikulnikoff v. Archbishop, etc., of Russian Orthodox Greek Catholic Church, 142 Misc. 894, 255 N.Y.S. 653, 663.

–Black’s Law: 5th Edition

–=–

Are you contractually bonded to the United States’ religion of law;
a government that claims to rule through God?

Perhaps you should read that definition once more…

We will read this legal definition again at the end of Part 1, after the
knowledge contained within will make its meaning much more clear.

–=–

In short, these “oaths” taken by United States (not American) soldiers as seen above are no different than the blind pledge of allegiance taken by school children to an inanimate object called a flag. Through the illusion of nationalism and patriotism, the majority of these men and women of the military have no idea that their pledge is to an artificial municipal corporation named Washington D.C, and to the artificial “Corporations Sole” who occupy it. This oath is not to their actual living family, their friends, America, and Americans or to any of “the people”.

Interestingly, all of these oaths include God as their witness, though those who took the German Oath of Loyalty did not have the choice to make an affirmation (an oath not of or under God) as the United States oath offers.

Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856, defines these important religious and non-religious acts as specifically opposite from one another:

OATH. A declaration made according to law, before a competent tribunal or officer, to tell the truth; or it is the act of one who, when lawfully required to tell the truth, takes God to witness that what he says is true. It is a religious act by which the party invokes God not only to witness the truth and sincerity of his promise, but also to avenge his imposture or violated faith, or in other words to punish his perjury if he shall be guilty of it. 2. It is proper to distinguish two things in oaths; (1.) The invocation by which the God of truth, who knows all things, is taken to witness. (2.) The imprecation by which he is asked as a just and all-powerful being, to punish perjury. 3. The commencement of an oath is made by the party taking hold of the book, after being required by the officer to do so, and ends generally with the words,”so help you God,” and kissing the book, when the form used is that of swearing on the Evangelists. 4. Oaths are taken in various forms; the most usual is upon the Gospel by taking the book in the hand; the words commonly used are, “You do swear that, ” & “so help you God,” and then kissing the book. The origin of this oath may be traced to the Roman law, and the kissing the book is said to be an imitation of the priest’s kissing the ritual as a sign of reverence, before he reads it to the people.  5. Another form is by the witness or party promising holding up his right hand while the officer repeats to him,”You do swear by Almighty God, the searcher of hearts, that… “And this as you shall answer to God at the great day.” 6. In another form of attestation commonly called an affirmation, the officer repeats, “You do solemnly, sincerely, and truly declare and affirm, that,(i.e. without God)… 7. The oath, however, may be varied in any other form, in order to conform to the religious opinions of the person who takes it

(**Note that these definitions in Bouvier’s and Black’s Law dictionaries include “case law” references, meaning these definitions are paraphrases of actual court decisions and opinions. For the purposes of this essay, those references have been removed for ease of reading and comprehension. See dictionaries for case references.)

Here we see that the oath is in all accounts a religious test and sacrament. And it is important to note that one who does not fear God or who swears to another god or Deity will not be at all worried about lying under oath upon the Bible, for if the devil truly exists, that “lord of lies” would surely require perjury from its followers.

AFFIRMANT, practice. One who makes affirmation instead of making oath that the evidence which he is about to give shall be the truth, as if he had been sworn. He is liable to all the pains and penalty of perjury, if he shall be guilty of willfully and maliciously violating his affirmation.

AFFIRMATION, practice. A solemn declaration and asseveration, which a witness makes before an officer, competent to administer an oath in a like case, to tell the truth, as if be had been sworn. 2. In the United States, generally, all witnesses who declare themselves conscientiously scrupulous against taking a corporal oath, are permitted to make a solemn affirmation, and this in all cases, as well criminal as civil. 3. In England, laws have been enacted which partially relieve persons who, have conscientious scruples against taking an oath, and authorize them to make affirmation. In France, the laws which allow freedom of religious opinion, have received the liberal construction that all persons are to be sworn or affirmed according to the dictates of their consciences; and a quaker’s affirmation has been received and held of the same effect as an oath. 4. The form is to this effect: “You, A B, do solemnly, sincerely, and truly declare and affirm…” For the violation of the truth in such case, the witness is subject to the punishment of perjury” as if he had been sworn. 5. Affirmation also means confirming; as, an affirmative statute.

–=–
The Hypocritical Affirmation Of
The Mormon Corporation Sole

–=–

For the purposes of this research, remember that to affirm in the Untied States jurisdiction is to purposefully not swear an oath under the Biblical Christian “God”, and more specifically to not be under the punishment or wrath of that “God” for perjury in this life and/or in the “after-life”. Of course, religious leaders and politicians with no irony or hesitation often choose to be affirmed in court cases and in congress instead of being sworn in under “God”. This is no irony, but a purposeful deceit to purger or withhold information from a government that protects that act of purger through the act of affirmation. Affirmation is dishonesty masked under a false legal status of credibility, and it is a choice often made by men who take the mark of Corporations Sole.

It is one thing for a random man to affirm due to his contentions with organized religion, it is a whole other can of worms when it is the leader or president of a corporate religion who chooses to affirm in court instead of swearing to tell the truth with God as his witness and accept His wrath for perjury…

In the case of the corporation called the Mormon Church, we have the incredible revelations of the Reed Smoot Senate hearing as a perfect example…

Mormon_Smoot_1

When then president of the Mormon “church”, Mr. Joseph F. Smith, was called to testify before Congress in 1906, he was requested by the Senate to “swear in”. Instead, he is quoted below as stating in the congressional record that “I prefer to affirm, if you please.” In other words, the supposedly Christian Mormon President and current “Prophet” of God incarnate wished not to swear to that God that he would tell the truth underGod’s wrath. Of course he was likely doing so as an artificial “Corporation Sole”. The record then directly states, “Joseph F. Smith, having duly affirmed, testifies as follows…“.

Having avoided the wrath of God for perjury, the clever “prophet” Smith was free to lie and obfuscate without God in the name of his Corporation.

The following is from the official transcript of that Senate hearing and makes for a very interesting read:


Why such an official protest from the electors of the States?

“We… protest: that Apostle Reed Smoot, Senator elect from the State of Utah…
ought not be permitted to qualify by taking the oath of office or to sit as a
Member of the United States Senate, for reasons effecting the honor
and dignity of the United States and their Senators in Congress.”

Why?

“Ruling Authorities” of the Mormon Church claim:
“…Supreme authority, divinely mentioned, to shape the belief and control
the conduct under them in all matters whatsoever, civil and religious,
temporal and spiritual, and who uniting in themselves
authority in church and state…”

**In other words, a Mormon’s oath to the Church takes
precedent over their oath to the country, the same reason that those
in the know today do not wish Mitt Romney to obtain the seat of President.

How?

“Men who hold the (Mormon) priesthood possess divine authority to act for God,
and by possessing part of God’s power they are in reality part of God
those who reject it (the priesthood bestowed by the church), reject God.”


Mormon / Masonic Sunstone (Sun worship).


Mormon Church (Assembly Hall)  inside of “Temple Square”,
The Mormon corporate headquarters or “Vatican” of Salt Lake City

Joseph Smith’s Book of Mormon speaks of the restoration of Israel:

“And it came to pass that I, Nephi, spake much unto them
concerning these things; yea, I spake unto them concerning
the restoration of the Jews in the latter days.”

“And I did rehearse unto them the words of Isaiah, who spake
concerning the restoration of the Jews, or of the house of Israel;
and after they were restored they should no more be confounded,
neither should they be scattered again.”

–=–

During the 1930s and 1940s, Mormon Senators William King and
Elbert Thomas were both Democrats from Utah.
Both men were fervent Christian Zionists.

**Zionism is support for the illegal “State” of Israel.
Clandestinely though, Zionism’s goal is to reestablish the
“Kingdom of Jerusalem” and rebuild Solomon’s Temple.

For the Star of David is actually the ancient Seal of Solomon…

As we will soon realize, this is the goal of all
Masonic religions and societies worldwide.

Senator Thomas visited Jerusalem in 1912.
According to his diary, he sat on the Mount of Olives and read from the
writings of early Mormon leader Orson Hyde about the Jews:

“Consecrate this land for the gathering together of Judah’s
scattered remnants, for the building up of Jerusalem again
after it has been trodden down by the Gentiles so long.
Restore the kingdom unto Israel, raise up Jerusalem as its capitol.”

Mormon Senator William King was one of the founding members
of the American Palestine Committee – an organization set up
in the 1930s to rally Christian support for Jewish statehood.

Sen. Thomas developed close ties to Benzion Netanyahu,
who in those days was director of the
Revisionist Zionists’ American division.

David Ben Gurion, first president of the Israeli “State” from 1948 stated:

“You know, there are no people in the world
who understand the Jews like the Mormons.”

–=–

As part of the Reed Smoot case, it was necessary to ascertain for the record the incredible monopolies of private corporations that were held and operated by the Mormon Church and its leadership, including Union Pacific Railroad, and that was also acting as the government of Utah. It is shocking to consider the power of this religious incorporation then, especially when considering how much it has grown in the last 100 years. For instance, the Mormon corporation named “Bonneville Communications” just a decade ago owned a virtual monopoly on every talk radio station in Washington D.C. before selling (privatizing) them to other Mormons – members by blood in that Masonic Brotherhood of the Church – to give the appearance that the corporation of the Church no longer held that monopoly.

In government, this is called privatization.

We read this incredible admission in the senate record, as stated officially by the affirmed and arrogant president of the Church Joseph F. Smith. Note that Smith is the “Successor” of the previous “prophets” and presidents of the church, signifying the passing of not only the Corporation Sole, but the claim of divinity and rule by and through God, as stated below, “…endowed with all the powers that they were possessed of”:



Not Ironically, the Sheriff of Salt Lake County is none other than a Mormon descendent named Jim Winder of the aforementioned Winder in this case, whose brother is a City Mayor, and whose Mormon family have 10 generations in politics in Utah.

You can read about my personal battles to try and expose what Sheriff Winder has done to Salt Lake County in my research article and documentary below:

Article – “The Sheriff Who Sold His County”

Link–>https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2011/05/22/the-sheriff-who-sold-his-county/

And also view my lecture about special districts
taking over lawful government in a County near you

–=–
The United States Theocracy
–=–

If the sudden realization of the true communist nature of the American “Pledge of Allegiance” to the Untied States is surprising to you, especially if you are a parent today, then I hope this new knowledge will be enough to move you to continue down this rabbit hole and finish reading the information that I have provided here. Imagine the shock you might feel if the history of the constitution and its so-called “founding fathers” were also revealed to be something quite different than what you’ve always imagined or learned – what your children are learning today in required government schools. What other beliefs might be promoted in our government funded schools, Universities, and media monopolies that realize their origins in a similar form of communism and fascism? And what if I were to tell you that I can conclusively show you today that the United States is not nor ever has been a republic, a democracy, nor any other political moniker… but is instead and always has been a clandestine (hidden) theocracy?

THEOCRACY. A species of government which claims to be immediately directed by GodReligion, which in former times, frequently associated itself with despotism, to reign, by its power, or under its shadow, has sometimes attempted to reign alone, and this she has called the reign of God, theocracy. –Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856

THEOCRACY. Government of a state by the immediate direction of God, (or by the assumed direction of a supposititious divinity), or the state thus governed. –Black’s Law Dictionary, 4rth Edition

A “State thus governed (controlled)” by those who claim to be directed by God or some god-like divinity or deity

Sounds about accurate when considering the righteously pompous men who rule (as Corporations Sole) with impunity against the will of mankind in the Untied States, doesn’t it? After all, when was the last time Congress or the president acted upon the will of the people as opposed to the will of the corporate world?

Is the United States constitution, its form of government, and its political leadership really the first government in world history to not be ordained by and head the Holy church? Is its power really based on “we, the common people”? Or is that authority in fact based on a higher power than man, so as to be a (Masonic/Deist) theocracy? And did the “Founding Fathers” create the United States and its constitution under God… or under affirmation?

The answers to these questions and evidence provided herein will certainly surprise you.

–=–
Is Freemasonry a religion?
–=–

Well, it depends on whom you ask. For designated corporate religions are bound by laws (Statutes), while Orders make their own.

The Supreme Court of Nebraska decided that:

“The guiding thought (of Masonry) is not religion but religious toleration …. The Masonic fraternity refrains from intruding into the field of religion and confines itself to the teaching of morality and duty to one’s fellow men, which makes better men and better citizens… The distinction is clear between such ethical teachings and the doctrines of religion. One cannot espouse a religion without belief and faith in its peculiar doctrines. A fraternity broad enough to take in and cover with its mantle Christian, Moslem and Jew, without requiring him to renounce his religion, is not a religious organization, although its members may join in prayer which, in the case of each, is a petition addressed to his own Deity. Neither can the belief in the immortality of the soul be denominated religious in the sense that it is typical of any religion, of any race, or of any age. It constitutes one of the most beautiful and consoling features of our own religion, but it is equally found in almost every other. It is so unusual and spontaneous that it is not so much belief or dogma as it is an instinct of the human soul. Neither does it imply or require adherence to any system of religious worshipThe fact that belief in the doctrines or deity of no particular religion is required, of itself refutes the theory that the Masonic ritual embodies a religion, or that its teachings are religious.”

–“Let There Be Light”, by Alphonse Cerza, The Masonic Service Association, 1983.

–=–

But when it comes to saving a few shekels by keeping a tax-exempt status and protecting their property, the Masons are quite happy to be named as a pseudo “religion”:

SCOTTISH RITE CATHEDRAL vs. ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES et al.

LINK–>http://law.justia.com/cases/california/court-of-appeal/2007/b194230.html

“Freemasonry is a religion – a California appeals court ruled on Oct 3, and its adherents must be given equal standing as other faiths under US law.  In a case involving the Los Angeles Scottish Rite Cathedral and the City of Los Angeles, the Seventh District Court of Appeals in Los Angeles held it could not distinguish between “the earnest pursuit of [Masonic] principlesfrom more widely acknowledged modes of religious exercise” such as Christianity or Judaism.

The Court was asked to hear the Freemasons appeal of a lower court’s ruling that the City of Los Angeles could regulate the use of the Masonic cathedral. The Scottish Rite Freemasons argued that while they were not a formal “religion”, their property should however be exempted from government regulation to the same degree that churches were exempted so as to allow them the free “religious exercise”.

They cited the US Federal law the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 in support of their contention, saying it prohibits a government from implementing a land use regulation in a way that “imposes a substantial burden” on one’s “religious exercise.”

The Court held that it could find “no decisions analyzing whether Masonic practices are sufficiently religious in nature to qualify for protection” under law.

However it used the test adopted by the courts in the case of the US v Meyers that presented a five-pronged test in defining whether a creed or belief was a “religious belief” and determined it was a religion.

Although Freemasonry does not identify itself as a religion” the Court stated “it plainly fosters principles and practices that resemble religious exercise.””

This is a brilliant circumvention of law here, where the Masonic Rite is considered a religion for certain legal purposes by a Masonic (BAR) Judge, but inversely is not required to register and incorporate as a religion. This is like a man being granted women’s rights status while remaining a legal man.

Interestingly, that five-pronged test listed in this court case is sourced to include:

“The Meyers court adopted a multi-part test inquiring into (1) the ultimate ideas embraced by the asserted belief; (2) metaphysical ideas addressing transcendence of the physical world; (3) moral or ethical systems constraining an adherent’s conduct; (4) comprehensiveness of beliefs; and (5) accoutrements of religion such as a founder or teacher, important writings, gathering places, keepers of knowledge, ceremonies and rituals, structure and propagation or recruitment.  (U.S. v. Meyers, supra, 906 F.Supp. at  pp. 1502-1503.)”

Thus, Masonry is protected as if it were a religion and accepts the benefits thereof, even though it vehemently opposes the legal title and statutes that bind a corporate “religion”.

Sadly, the same could honestly be said of many members of supposedly Christian incorporated religions today…

–=–

In 1952, eighty-nine percent of the U.S. Supreme Court Justices were Freemasons.”

–‘10,000 Famous Freemasons’, by William R. Denslow

–=–
Our Citizenship To The
Temple Of The United States

–=–

As painful as these above images are with regards to the origins of this childhood indoctrination process of public education, blind allegiance, and the forced patriotism and nationalism that most of us have unwittingly participated in – contributing ever so much to our collective lack of knowledge and its side-effect of servitude –  it is still more troubling to be in the position I’m in at this very moment. For with knowledge comes duty; the natural pull on ones senses to inform ones fellow man of a clear and present danger that is literally killing and enslaving my people and, militarily, millions and likely soon to be billions across the world. And so I present the following essay simply because it is the duty of having attained such knowledge, regardless of the consequences or enemies it may realize, and because truly no man is free unless all men are free.

Thus, no man is free unless all men have knowledge

–=–


How to build a logical fallacy – An appeal to Holy authority,
by Sean Hannity and courtesy of Fox News.

“European mysticism was not dead at the time the United States of America was founded. The hand of the Mysteries controlled in the establishment of the new government, for the signature of the Mysteries may still be seen on the Great Seal of the United States of America. Carefully analysis of the seal discloses a mass of occult and Masonic symbols, chief among them the so-called American eagle—a bird which Benjamin Franklin declared unworthy to be chosen as the emblem of a great, powerful, and progressive people. Here again only the student of symbolism can see through the subterfuge and realize that American eagle upon the Great Seal is but a conventionalized phoenix, a fact plainly discernible from an examination of the original seal. In his sketch of the “History of the Seal of the United States,” Gaillard Hunt unwittingly brings forward much material to substantiate the belief that the original seal carried the phoenix bird on its obverse surface. . .”

“Not only were many of the founders of the United States Government Masons, but they received aid from a secret and august body existing in Europe, which helped them to establish this country for a peculiar and particular purpose known only to the initiated and for the most part unknown–and the unfinished pyramid upon its reverse side is a trestle-board setting forth symbolically the task to the accomplishments of which the United States Government was dedicated from the day of its inception.”

–Manly P. Hall; “The Secret Teachings of All Ages” pages xc and xci


“The Great Seal”

The Eye of Providence was a well-known classical
symbol of the deity since at least the Renaissance.

–=–

Description of the Reverse side of the Great Seal

Original 1782 description for the Great Seal of the United States of America

Symbols and mottos link to their respective pages.

–=–

E-Pluribus Unum = “Out of Many, One.”

Annuit Conceptis = “Announcing the Birth (of)”

Novus Ordo Seclorum = “New Order (Cycle) of the Ages”

–=–

File:Continental Currency One-Third-Dollar 17-Feb-76 rev.jpg
Franklin’s early design on a 1776 currency note
“We Are One – American Congress”

–=–

Note that the City of Philadelphia was given the Masonic nick-name:

“The City of Brotherly Love”

–=–

Nesta Webster on Illuminism

–=–

I realize now that citizenship to the United States (a series of corporate buildings in Washington D.C. fashioned in Roman architecture and Egyptian symbols) is wholly un-American. To the average United States citizen, this statement would generally be considered offensive – and even thought to be something akin to sacrilege. Of course, this is but a surface reaction by those with patriotism but without knowledge of what they are irrationally defending, as would be expected by any member of a cult. Ironically, this word is in fact a religious term; a fallacy in its appeal to god-like authority – often used by various religions and cults when their irrational authority, holiness, or doctrines are challenged by factual evidence. For to challenge government or church authority is literally to challenge God!

But if these terms are religious in nature, why are the legal dictionaries throughout U.S. history littered with them as valid and modern legal terminology?

Of course, the most historically accurate and most obvious answer to this question is that throughout history, ALL governments have been derived via similar ceremonies and coronations of the national Church and religion, where the sovereign king, queen, dictator, or ruler claims authority not only by God, but through Him, and is generally appointed by blood relation to previous kings and by sacred anointment as the head of the church and country.

As it was, so it is today…

But then came along little old America, completely funded by the Masonic Monarchs of France and Great Britain (with its Virginia Corporation and East India Company). And yet we are to believe that the United States’ authority is derived by the “constitution” of a few scraggly outlaw settlers (who just happened to be wealthy slave-owning bloodline cousins of those same Plantagenet Kings as well as Freemasons), whom suddenly realized that separation of church and state was the way to go in their Order amongst the New World?

Of course this is absolutely contradictory to the fallacious notion that the United States was constituted as a “Christian” nation by Christian men. As we will read later, the founding fathers were certainly not Christian men, and instead were vehemently opposed to Christianity and the uncontrolled (ungoverned) organization of its churches – according to their own writings. This story of the United States being founded with Christian roots is just one more fallacy that must see its ruination if the good Christian and non-Christian people of America ever wish to be truly free of this Deist, Masonic world government (mind control); to stop fighting amongst themselves so as to focus on the real enemies among them and over them – as has been from the dawn of civilization.

Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856 actually defines the derivatives of this word sacrilege as a legal terminology:

SACRILEGE. The act of stealing from the temples or churches dedicated to the worship of God, articles consecrated to divine uses.

Of course, theft from the churches was theft from government, for government was ordained by the church and government headed the church in true symbiotic fashion. But what about here in the United States?

Well, let me ask you some questions…

Do you truly believe that the seven “Articles” within the constitution of the United States are sacred in their use by presidents, congressmen, and justices for the worship of the Christian God as His law?

How about the “Articles of Confederation“?

Do you really believe these sacred articles were of a Christian origin?

Gnostic answer: The craft now called Masonry predates Christianity by thousands of years.

We are certainly told over an over that these documents were divinely inspired by those cult-like citizens and constitutional attorney’s who worship the constitution as if it were the idol of the golden calf. And yet in the same sentence we may also hear again how important the separation of Church and State is to that government.

The constitution is clear:

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…” –1st Amendment

“…no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.” –Article VI

This establishment of religion clause refers to a central or federal religion such as the Church of England. Yet, as we will discuss, this concept of Qualification via religious Test and belief is the very foundation of government, despite what this constitution states for public consumption. For the oath is a sacred sacrament to “God”, and a requirement for government office.

So why is this sacred oath made by government officials directed to “God” and not to the people for whom that oath is supposed to protect if indeed there is a separation of church and State? Oh, that’s right, the Oath only pledges loyalty to the artificial government and its founding constitution, not to the actual living natural people – because government is not the people!

Consider this… In Masonry, the belief in some form of “higher power” is a virtual requirement for membership (citizenship) in Masonry, though exactly which god or form of worship one chooses is up to the initiate. Other than being a requirement to vaguely believe, is this not a perfect description of the “freedom of religion” and “separation of church and state” ideals that was the Masonic founding of America? Masonry: the pseudo-religion that stands on the back of and tolerates all others. Does anything else really explain these contradictions in the American way? And what better way to protect this Masonic Brotherhood as the rulers of government than to deny the organization of religion from government operations, while keeping the hall meetings of Masons where government is planned a secret from the people?

Interestingly, we see the sacrament of religion in the legal aspect of the political oath as well. Politicians generally swear their oath to the government upon the Holy Bible, so help them and as seen above, despite these religious freedom clauses in the constitution that would seemingly make the sole use of the Christian Bible for such oaths unlawful. In courtrooms, witnesses are also sworn in with the Bible.

The current congressional oath was enacted in 1884:

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.”

Here again we can read that the congressional oath has nothing to do with protecting or serving the people of America. In fact, it specifically states that a Congressman must protect government against the domestic citizens (the people). It is an oath to the continuity of the Masonic institution of government called the United States. And of course the option to affirm is granted. The fallacy that the constitution somehow refers to the people is egregious and a frighteningly ignorant qualification by the minds of the governed, especially when we read an oath that protects the constitution from the people!

Please also not that this pledge has very Masonic undertones, in that when a Mason take a pledge in the lodge ceremony, he does so “freely and without coercion”.

At the Executive level, we can hear our current president state his allegiance and oath to protect the corporate constitution and government, but never are the living breathing people or America ever mentioned…


And the people cheer…
Even though it is them the Constitution needs protection from.

–=–

So where did this concept of the oath come from?

Another word for oath is the religious and legal word “sacrament”.

Bouvier’s Law Dictionary of 1856 explains simply:

SACRAMENTUM. An oath; as, qui dicunt supra sacramentum suum.

At its basic root, we can see that the swearing of religeous oath allows certain legal rights as the sacra-ment of honor, title, and status. From Blacks Law 4rth Edition, we can see the true roots of the word sacra-ment:

SACRA. Lat. In Roman law. The right to participate in the sacred rites of the city.

The sacra-mentum (oath) is stated to acquire authority from “God” in the sacred rites of the city…

The word rite (Latin ritus) is defined as: A RELIGIOUS CUSTOM. Of course, governments have always held their rights under the religious dogma and customs of their perspective State churches. The Monarchy of England and the Church of England (formally the Roman Catholic Church as Rome and its Vatican) is just one example… And yet this religious “sacra” in the United States never seems to be acknowledged as such. Instead, the people still believe that their government is somehow of themselves (of the common people) and separated from the mystery religions, even as it kills, harms, imprisons, taxes, extorts, and kidnaps the common people and their children under some other authority it gains by swearing an oath to some higher power over those “people” in a religious custom.

Consent of the governed = Consent of the controlled.

Sacrament = rite of control of the “city” over the mind (of and for the people).

Imagine the hilarity government officers (Masons under sacred oath) must feel as they pretend to use the consent of the very governed (i.e. controlled) people they harm, tax, imprison, kill, and steal the property of as the excuse for its actions against those same people (citizens). And it uses the 5th Amendment of the very constitution those people have been trained to hold dear as its claim of power and authority to steal from the citizens even as the people scream that it’s unconstitutional (see “eminent domain” defined in part 2).

Blacks Law 4rth expounds upon this sacrament oath to government:

SACRAMENTUM. Lat. Roman LawAn oath, as being a very sacred thing; more particularly, the oath taken by soldiers to be true to their general and their country (to government, not its people). In one of the formal methods of beginning an action at law (legis actiones) known to the early Roman jurisprudence, the sacramentum was a sum of money deposited in court by each of the litigating parties, as a kind of wager or forfeit, to abide the result of the suit. The successful party received back his stake; the losing party forfeited his, and it was paid into the public treasury, to be expended for sacred objects, (in sacris rebus,) whence the name. At common law the Sacramentum is an oath.

Has anything really changed since the time of Roman domination (domain)? Of course not. For the Roman bloodlines still rule us today in America and throughout the world – a sacred cousinly dominion by blood claiming God-like authority granted by themselves over all common-blood people.

The forfeit of monetary sacramentum (sacred dollars as collateral) is now called “bail” (bailment) in the dishonorable de facto BAR administrative U.S. courts, similar to the ancient Roman system of sacramentum. The common law oath is just a replacement for the insurance money deposited for sacrament – for now we give our “word” as the word of God in court, following the copyrighted and sacred articles as set forth by the BAR Association and its international law society. And the fees paid for tickets and citations are placed into the public treasury’s investment funds, where they are used to buy sacred objects like stocks, bonds, real estate, foreign currencies, derivatives, and CUSIP commodities – the exaction (extortion) of monies from the common man to purchase power and wealth for government.

When we consider that the “oath” is assigned through the root word sacra as a rite or “religious custom”, we must consider that the oath is allowing one to enter government (control of people) through the rite of religious ceremony (ritual) so as to obtain the religious right to govern (control) – as in “the sacred rites of the city“. This is the way it’s been done for thousands of years.

SACRILEGIUM. Lat. In the civil law. The stealing of sacred things, or things dedicated to sacred uses; the taking of things out of a holy place. –Black’s Law 4th Edition

Is the United States dollar a sacred thing used for sacred uses? How about its banks that magically create that money through its Holy Federal Reserve via the oath (application and signature) of the common man?

If we think about this question not as satire but as a reality, we may understand why using the dollar for things that are against the law of that government (the holy place in Washington D.C.) are punishable by extreme measures like fines, confiscation, imprisonment, and even death.

–=–

“The United States Debt, foreign and domestic,
was the price of liberty.”

–Alexander Hamilton, as quoted by
government’s ‘Bureau of the Public Debt’ website

–=–

“IN GOD WE TRUST”

But what kind of trust?

–=–

Notice that these words IN GOD WE TRUST are all capitalized, hiding the knowledge of whether the word god should be capitalized or not (God vs. god), as in the Masonic “deity”.

So why does a government with a declared separation of church and state print the words IN GOD WE TRUST upon its money? And how is one to know which of the many gods of history it is referring to?

In which god do they trust?

Given the Federal Reserve’s interest charged on its dollars compared to the biblical teachings against the money-changing bankers and their system of usury and pledging, it is fairly easy to assume that the teachings of Jesus and most other religious doctrines (excepting Judaism) are not considered in this statement of “trust” of a “god”.

The questions that you may not have thought to ask are these:  How and why is the word GOD being used here on a government monetary instrument? What exactly is a legal “trust“? As a legal term on Legal Tender, is this money actually a monetary banking TRUST of GOD through some god’s sacramentum government?

This quote from the congressional record will be examined further on in this essay, but should be considered here when trying to define just what kind of trust we are talking about:

“The money will be worth 100 cents on the dollar because it is backed by the credit of the Nation. It will represent a mortgage on all the homes and other property of all the people in the Nation.” –Congressman Patman, speaking from the Congressional Record of March 9, 1933, and referring to the Act of March 9, 1933.

While many arm-chair patriots exclaim that the dollar is a worthless note printed out of thin air, we must here reconsider this idiom as fallacy – for this quote was made when the dollar was in the process of being stripped of its gold-standard backing and on its way to becoming a fiat currency, even as gold was being confiscated (stolen) by government from the supposedly “free” people. Thus, the dollar is literally backed in this god trust by the registered United States “persons” and their “property” as the surety for the value of the dollar.

Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856, expounds upon the legal word Trust:

TRUST, contracts, devises. An equitable right, title or interest in property, real or personal, distinct from its legal ownership; or it is a personal obligation for paying, delivering or performing anything, where the person (citizen) trusting has no real right or security, for by, that act he confides altogether to the faithfulness of those intrusted. This is its most general meaning, and includes deposits, bailments, and the like. In its more technical sense, it may be defined to be an obligation upon a person, arising out of a confidence reposed in him, to apply property faithfully, and according to such confidence… 6. When land is purchased by one man in the name of another, and the former pays the consideration money, the land will in general be held by the grantee in Trust for the person who so paid the consideration money… 8. When a contract is made for the sale of land, in equity the vendor is immediately deemed a trustee for the vendee of the estate; and the vendee, a trustee for the vendor of the purchase money; and by this means there is an equitable conversion of the property.

**Note that by this definition, it is the people putting all of their possessions into a “trust” to the government as an obligation or duty of citizenship. Thus, the words IN GOD WE TRUST are not simply a patriotic Christian pledge of allegiance to God on United States currency. It is literally a sacred and holy legal trust. For the dollar is “Legal Tender”, not a religious devotion. Government is the trustee of all public funds, lands, and property through Masonic Divine rite – the right to the city.

TRUSTEE, estates. A trustee is one to whom an estate has been conveyed in trust… 3. With respect to the duties of trustees, it is held, in conformity to the old law of uses, that pernancy (taking or receiving of something – as profits or rents or tithes in kind) of the profits, execution of estates, and defense of the land, are the three great properties of a trust, so that the courts of chancery will compel trustees, (1.) To permit the cestui que trust to receive the rents and profits of the land. (2.) To execute such conveyances, in accordance with the provisions of the trust, as the cestui que trust shall direct. (3.) To defend the title of the land in any court of law or equity.

The people never realize that their homes, their automobiles, their children, and any other property for which they register to government is a deranged act of conversion and conveyance of those things to government as trustee, signifying ownership by government and used by it as collateral for its currency – a legal Trust in “God’s” name.

CONVEYANCE, contracts. The transfer of the title to land by one or more persons to another or others. By the term persons is here understood not only natural persons but corporations. The instrument which conveys the property is also called a conveyance. For the several kinds of conveyances see Deed

Of course, the conveyance or deed of property includes the artificial person attached to all citizens (14th amendment persons), of which the man, woman, or child is the “surety”.

Take the legal trust called Social Security for example. The common misconception is to apply the conversational definition to the word “security”, when in fact government only deals in legal language.

The word Security is defined as a “monetary instrument” in modern day financial and legal terms, and is traded openly on the international commodities markets as “bundled securities”. And of course the Social Security System is actually an investment “Trust Fund”.

SECURITY. That which renders a matter sure; an instrument which renders certain the performance of a contract. The term is also sometimes applied to designate a person who becomes the surety for another, or who engages himself for the performance of another’s contract. –Bouvier’s, 1856

SECURITY. Protection; assurance; indemnification. The term is usually applied to an obligation, pledge, mortgage, deposit, lien, etc., given by a debtor in order to make sure the payment or performance of his debt, by furnishing the creditor with a resource to be used in case of failure in the principal obligation. The name is also sometimes given to one who becomes surety or guarantor for another. –Black’s Law, 4rth Edition

Something very important is stated here. For the natural living, breathing people of America furnish the United States government (creditor) with themselves (their flesh and blood) as the “resource” to be used in case of failure in the principal obligation.

Just what is a “principal” obligation?

PRINCIPAL, adj. Chief; leading; most important or considerable; primary; original. Highest in rank, authority, character, importance, or degree. As to principal “Challenge,” “Contract,” “Obligation,” “Office,” and “Vein,” see those titles…

PRINCIPAL, n. The source of authority or right. A superintendent, as of a school district. The capital sum of a debt or obligation, as distinguished from interest or other additions to it. The corpus or capital of an estate in contradistinction to the income; “income” being merely the fruit of capital.

PRINCIPAL (Law of Agency)  – The employer or constitutor of an agent; the person who gives authority to an agent or attorney to do some act for him. Called also constituent or chief. One, who, being competent sui juris to do any act for his own benefit or on his own account, confides it to another person to do for him.

PRINCIPAL (Law of Guaranty and Suretyship) – The person primarily liable, for whose performance of his obligation the guarantor or surety has become bound.

It is very difficult to explain the dualistic nature of just what being a citizen means. For citizenship is nothing but a series of legal contracts with the United States government and representing “residence” in its jurisdiction, signed (or unsigned) by a real, living man or woman in America (the land mass including the 50 states united). This is often called a “Stawman”, though a more apt description would be a “Paperman”. The living man becomes the surety of this paper alter ego – the corporation called the artificial person (citizen). Thus, the Social Security system is nothing more than a contractual statement of debt and obligation of men as citizens to government (creditor); a pledge; a mortgage and lien against the man with the requirement to deposit funds into that GOD-TRUST as surety (debtor) for the citizen Paperman.

The word social simply refers to all individual citizens as one body of indebted (constituted) artificial persons in obligation to the creditor (government). Each man in society (under government) is obligated to pay his principal share or offer himself (the real man) as the resource to pay the debt as surety.

E-Pluribus Unum…

Out of Many, One…

Understanding the nature of this literal “Number of the Beast” of Social Security as a Mark of indentured servitude to the world government is vitally important. For this number is your bar code – your registration number as a commodity backing the U.S. dollar. Shedding it is the only way to satisfy the obligation of performance as the surety to the Paperman. For severing the number from the living man leaves no obligation (duty) of surety (responsibility) to the state of indebtedness to the “public debt” assigned to the entire S.S. numbered citizenry.

There are some who claim that by individuals becoming each a Corporation Sole, this whole statutory game of surety and debt, including the Social Security obligations, would be nullified under the common law only device of Corporation Sole. To this I have not done due diligence in research, and so I will only state it hear for your benefit in your own journey.

But how do you convince a bunch of slaves that they are better off without the benefits provided by government – that the only road to salvation and to a state of being free men is to abandon and say no to Federal government granted benefits?

Here lies the greatest and most deceitful dilemma of all… for the Social Security slaves believe they are already free despite their contractual nature and financial obligations of indebtedness with government.

Debt = Slavery

Please link to my previous research, which shows that the Social Security System was created in the League of Nations, almost a decade before being implemented in the United States, and that today this Social Security System is being managed in the United Nations under the World Bank, organized under the “International Social Security Administration”. Social Security is now in over 130 countries across the world, including all 1st world nations.

Link–> https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2012/04/24/social-security-the-international-mark-of-the-beast/

Also, please read more about the court’s opinion of who owns your children (for they carry the Number of govern-ment) here:

Link–>https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2011/12/16/do-you-own-your-children/)

I’ll list here just a few of the court’s opinions as authorities under some “god” who claim ownership of your children as registered artificial persons (citizens) and as conveyed contractual property for those with residence in the United States (citizenship in Washington D.C.):

“Marriage is a civil contract to which there are three parties – the husband, the wife and the state.” –Appellate Court of Illinois, NO. 5-97-0108

“The primary control and custody of infants is with the government.” –Tillman V. Roberts. 108 So. 62

“The court stands in the position of parens patria[e] of children.“ –Ayers v. Kelley, 284 Ala. 321, 224 So.2d 673 (1969)․

“”Parens patriae,” literally “parent of the country,” refers traditionally to role of state as sovereign and guardian of persons under legal disability.” –Ex parte Bayliss, 550 So.2d 986, 988 n. 1 (Ala.1989) (quoting Black’s Law Dictionary 1003 (5th ed.1979)).

“The state has a wide range of power for limiting parental freedom and authority in things affecting the child’s welfare… In fact, the entire familial relationship involves the State.” –Prince, 321 U.S. at 167, 64 S.Ct. at 442, 88 L.Ed. 645.

“In other words, the state is the father and mother of the child and the natural parents are not entitled to custody, except upon the state’s beneficent recognition that natural parents presumably will be the best of its citizens to delegate its custodial powers… ‘The law devolves the custody of infant children upon their parents, not so much upon the ground of natural right in the latter, as because the interests of the children, and the good of the public, will, as a general rule, be thereby promoted.’ ” –Chandler v. Whatley, 238 Ala. 206, 208, 189 So. 751, 753 (1939) (quoting Striplin v. Ware, 36 Ala. at 89) (‘ ’).

Now consider this universal legal code of “residence”. The California Government Code in Section 243 simply states:

“243. Every person has, in law, a residence.”

Thus, this maxim of legalized slavery tells you that by declaring residence as a 14th amendment citizen of the United States, you are a registered slave of that entity. While you have domicile (live in property) in the State of California, you are a fictional “resident” of Washington D.C. and thus subject to its laws as surety.

How many times a day are we told that we are “subject” to the Federal laws of the Untied States?

SUBJECT, contracts. The thing which is the object of an agreement. This term is used in the laws of Scotland.

SUBJECT, persons, government. An individual member of a nation, who is subject to the laws; this term is used in contradistiction to citizen, which is applied to the same individual when considering his political rights. 2. In monarchical governments, by subject is meant one who owes permanent allegiance to the monarch. Vide Body politic

SUBJECTION. The obligation of one or more persons to act at the discretion, or according to the judgment and will of others. 2. Subjection is either private or public. By the former is meant the subjection to the authority of private persons; as, of children to their parents, of apprentices to their masters, and the like. By the latter (public) is understood the subjection to the authority of public persons.

SUBMISSION. A yielding to authority. A citizen is bound to submit to the laws; a child to his parents; a servant to his master. A victor may enforce, the submission of his enemy. 2. When a captor has taken a prize, and the vanquished have submitted to his authority, the property, as between the belligerents, has been transferred. When there is complete possession on one side, and submission upon the other, the capture is complete.

SUBMISSION, contracts. An agreement by which persons who have a law-suit or difference with one another, name arbitrators to decide the matter, and bind themselves reciprocally to perform what shall be arbitrated.

As a citizen in contract and residence within the United States, you own nothing, for a citizen is an artificial, legal, corporate thing. You are a surety under submission as a subject of that corporation through tacit agreement and presumed consent, and you are required to sumbit to what government arbitrates and calls statutory and prima fascie law.

SURETY, contracts. A person who binds himself for the payment of a sum of money or for the performance of something else, for another, who is already bound for the same. A surety differs from a guarantor, and the latter cannot be sued until after a suit against the principal. 2. The surety differs from bail in this, that the latter actually has, or is by law presumed to have, the custody of his principal, while the former (surety) has no control over him. The bail may surrender his principal in discharge of his obligation; the surety cannot be discharged by such surrender.

Your artificial person called a “citizen” is bound to the “public debt”.

And you are bound to that artificial person as a surety that the artificial person will pay the debt.

PLEDGE. In the law of bailment. A bailment of goods to a creditor as security for some debt or engagement. A bailment or delivery of goods by a debtor to his creditor, to be kept till the debt be discharged… The necessary elements to constitute a contract one of “pledge” are: Possession of the pledged property must pass from the pledgor to the pledgee; the legal title to the property must remain in the pledgor; and the pledgee must have a lien on the property for the payment of a debt or the performance of an obligation due him by the pledgor or some other person-while, in a “chattel mortgage,” the legal title passes to the mortgagee subject to a defeasance… A bailment of personal property as security for a debt or other obligation.–Black’s 4rth

PLEDGEE. The party to whom goods are pledged, or delivered in pledge.

PLEDGERY. Suretyship, or an undertaking or answering for another.

Social Security… or Social Pledge?

A Pledge of Allegiance… or a Pledge to be a subject to debt in submission as surety?

Why can government take your property and allow banks to do the same through the judicial decisions it makes enforced by the county Sheriff? Why its because your so-called “personal property” is a security for the debt and obligation of your strawman.

In order to bind a man to another without him or her knowing, government creates an artificial person (incorporation) without ever fully disclosing that dualistic Strawman (paperman) contractual identity to the man. And yet identity theft is rampant, where the identity of the artificial person is stolen and used by someone else in fraud, often without even the slightest knowledge of the living man that is its surety. And this specifically shows the difference between the real man and the artificial person – for the person can be taken away from the man. Citizenship can be revoked, and yet the man lives on… Identity theft is a federal crime because that artificial person and its Social Security number is the official property of the government, who contracts with the man and allows the man to use the property (person).

You are just a user of government property, including your name and number. For the name you use is government-owned through trust and domain. You are bound to perform on behalf of your corporate name as surety. And a man cannot have residence, only a 14th amendment citizen can, for the citizen is a contractual artificial person owned by government and leased to you. As soon as you are born and entered into contract (birth certificate and social) and according to Bouvier’s 1856, you might simply call yourself a citizen slave…

SLAVE. A man who is by law deprived of his liberty for life, and becomes the property of another. 2. A slave has no political rights, and generally has no civil rights. He can enter into no contract unless specially authorized by law; what he acquires generally, belongs to his master. The children of female slaves follow the condition of their mothers, and are themselves slaves. –Bouvier’s Law, 1856

This definition explains the average citizen’s disposition all too well:

(1) The 5th amendment allows government to deprive its citizens of life, liberty, and property with due process of its own law by the very courts who claim to own your children as property of the State above.

(2) Citizens have given up natural rights for contractual political/civil rights from government – in other words they accept in contractual servitude whatever rights their government grants them as slave/citizens. Note that civil rights are in no way whatsoever natural rights under God, but are a government granted status and privilege.

(3) The citizen can only enter into contracts allowed and authorized by government (law). If he incorporates, his corporation is a government corporation requiring his master’s (government’s) permission and license to do business and make contracts with other government corporations and persons. Without a license, a subjected citizen can do no business in the jurisdiction (residence) of the United States corporation.

(4) The Citizen’s “property” belongs to his master or “sovereign” – the government – through contractual citizenship and as collateral for the general currency, which he may utilize for user-only purposes as legal tender.

More on this later…

In other words, government is claiming to be a Holy church or temple; believing that it can somehow have god-like authority over all things through the use of its holy works, things, and articles (such as constitutions and contracts). It even accepts an oath to God as acceptance into its Order of the temple, as if God (or some god) granted it His authority Himself.

The fallacy of Americans is that this has happened over time, and that the original constitution was in fact somehow immune to all of this mental and contractual enslavement that we have today. And yet at the same time, even while we are all enslaved, Americans still want to protect the constitution – the very foundation of the government that enslaves them through debt and obligation. This oxymoron creates the irrational use of words like traitor and sacrilege…

SACRILEGE. In English criminal law. Larceny from a church. The crime of breaking a church or chapel, and stealing therein. In old English law. The desecration of anything considered holy; the alienation to laymen or to profane or common purposes of what was given to religious persons and to pious uses.

Remember, there was no separation of church and State in English law, thus the words laymen and religious persons both refer to politicians of the church and State.

SACRILEGUS. Lat. In the civil and common law. A sacrilegious person; one guilty of sacrilege.

–=–

“Receive my instruction, and not silver;
and knowledge rather than choice gold.”

“For wisdom is better than rubies; and all the things
that may be desired are not to be compared to it.”

Proverbs 8:10-11 (KJB)

–=–

Ironically, the acceptance of the United States Dollar by Americans is akin to accepting silver, gold, and rubies in lieu of the knowledge and the wisdom that would otherwise set a people free from this theocracy’s debt induced contractual slavery of all its citizens. For the dollar is the root of the evils of monetary debt enslavement – a trust formed by evil money-changing men and certainly not by God or approved within the Bible.

And so I say unto the people of America, do you believe it to be sacrilege when I say what I have said? For if you do, then you must believe that I have stolen from or blasphemed your government as if it were a religion, church, or temple – as is the legal definition of the word sacrilege.

Do you believe that your government is your church? Your temple? Is it truly of God or just pretending? Can you really believe that everything it does is for the greater good as commissioned by That divine entity through its constitution, and that its sacred opinions and legal articles should not be questioned – just like any other religious institution and its dogma? And is this not the same belief of a typical member of a cult for its leaders – its leaders being the governing body of the cult (religion)?

Do you believe me to be guilty of sacrilege by defaming these corrupt but sacramental oath-taking politicians, their flag, and their corporation they call a country? If so, do you then somehow believe them Holy and thus justified in their completely corrupt actions? For you must be of the religion of the “Cult of the Constitution” to believe that I have just committed such an unholy alienation of your laymen as political figures; religious persons that even as you read this piously use their own statutory, sacred articles of law to corrupt everything you see for personal and empire profit and gain at your expense.

Are you brave and strong enough in your faithful resolve that the United States is a Christian nation that you may further challenge your belief by continuing with me on this journey? For if indeed it is not a Christian nation or not founded as such, should not God wish you to learn how to make it so – a nation bound only by the natural law of God and not the extraneous statutory legal atrocities of man against nature and God?

To be clear… I absolutely do desecrate, turn my back on, and do not consent to, accept, or acknowledge the legitimacy of this supposedly sacred temple of the Untied States and its Holy stranglehold over America and its people. And I invite you to keep reading to find out the whole truth… for any doubts or questions you might have thus far will likely be answered herein…

–=–
The Power Of God?
–=–

When we stop and consider for just a moment, we realize that all governments of the past and present derive their power from some form of sacramentum – an oath under the supervision of some form of god or deity – and that the legal language and authority claimed has always been ecclesiastical in nature; ritually derived from a higher power. For if its power were truly derived from the common people it governs (controls), it would have no power over the common people at all – for the people could then just voluntarily say no to government any time they disagree with it. No police officer could crush their heads in without asking permission first.

Does this really sound logical or reasonable to you?

When we think of this “of, by, and for the people” propaganda, we realize that the whole concept is indeed ridiculous. For it would literally mean that the people are governing themselves, and that no edict, declaration, or law from government would ever have any authority over any of the individual people if they did not personally agree with it…

Perhaps if the people were each an individual Corporation Sole things might be different.

That is, unless the sacramentum is taken into consideration, where allegiance is not just ceremonial, but ecclesiastically binding upon a people who never even realize the nature of their pledge. For the ancient form of pledging has always been an integral part of the religious customs of corrupt governments acting as if they were God’s chosen incorporation on Earth.

ECCLESIASTICAL. Belonging to, or set apart for the church; as, distinguished from civil or secular. Vide Church.

ECCLESIASTICS, canon law. Those persons who compose the hierarchical state of the church. They are regular and secular.

ECCLESIASTIC. A clergyman; one destined to the divine ministry, as, a bishop, a priest, a deacon.

ECCLESIASTICAL LAW. By this phrase it is intended to include all those rules which govern ecclesiastical tribunals. Vide Law Canon.

ECCLESIASTICAL COURTS. English law. Courts (tribunals) held by the king’s authority as supreme governor of the church, for matters which chiefly concern religion…

When considering the Cannon law – Greek: kanon / κανών, Arabic: Qanon / قانون, Hebrew: kaneh / קנה, we must realize the Masonic origins of the Roman Catholic Church. Unfortunately, we must also understand that “Church’s” crusade against Christianity across the nations. For the ancient understanding of this word “Cannon” stems from the tools of that deistic Order of Masons, and is defined as “straight”; a rule, code, standard, or measure. The root meaning in each of these languages is the word “reed”, or the Romantic era English word for “cane”, another sacred symbol in Freemasonry.

As required viewing and for a more deep comprehension of the root nature of the Catholic Church and its true intent, please take the time to view this lecture. Understanding the symbols of Islam and Catholicism as one in the same religion and that both are opposed to true Christianity is of vital importance to comprehending the goal of world religions and Masonry, seeking to divide, conquer, then unify all men into one world religion.

Pardon the religious (Christian) overtones in the very beginning credits,
for the information presented thereafter is vital to our understanding.

It is hard to imagine that the Catholic Church (Jesuits)
created Islam to rid Europe, Africa, and the land in the Middle East
of un-governed Christianity and to control all occultism.

At around the 43 minute mark in this video, Walter tells you
of the setting up of World War 3 as a religious war between religions.
This is a preplanned war pitting Islam against Judea-Christianity (Zionism).
To this I attest and will ultimately show this reality is happening even as you read…

–=–

As referred to in this video lecture above, we see another example of the true nature of just what a constitution is and where in fact its origins lay. The following is literally a constitution to change and alter the laws (cannons) of the Roman Church with regards to the worship of Mary, altering the original Apostolic Constitutions from the Popes (government) in the 1400’s-1500’s.

In other words, this is an amendment” to the “Constitution.

–=–

The Immaculate Conception

“Ineffabilis Deus”

“Apostolic Constitution issued by Pope Pius IX on December 8, 1854.”

“Papal Sanctions”

“…So at the instance and request of the bishops mentioned above, with the chapters of the churches, and of King Philip and his kingdoms, we renew the Constitutions and Decrees issued by the Roman Pontiffs, our predecessors, especially Sixtus IV, Paul V, and Gregory XV, in favor of the doctrine asserting that the soul of the Blessed Virgin, in its creation and infusion into the body, was endowed with the grace of the Holy Spirit and preserved from original sin; and also in favor of the feast and veneration of the conception of the Virgin Mother of God, which, as is manifest, was instituted in keeping with that pious belief. So we command this feast to be observed under the censures and penalties contained in the same Constitutions.

Translation: Mary is God, and we’ll punish or kill you if you don’t agree.

“And therefore, against all and everyone of those who shall continue to construe the said Constitutions and Decrees in a manner apt to frustrate the favor which is thereby given to the said doctrine, and to the feast and relative veneration, or who shall dare to call into question the said sentence, feast and worship, or in any way whatever, directly or indirectly, shall declare themselves opposed to it under any pretext whatsoever, were it but only to the extent of examining the possibilities of effecting the definition, or who shall comment upon and interpret the Sacred Scripture, or the Fathers or Doctors in connection therewith, or finally, for any reason, or on any occasion, shall dare, either in writing or verbally, to speak, preach, treat, dispute or determine upon, or assert whatsoever against the foregoing matters, or who shall adduce any arguments against them, while leaving them unresolved, or who shall disagree therewith in any other conceivable manner, we hereby declare that in addition to the penalties and censures contained in the Constitutions issued by Sixtus IV to which we want them to be subjected and to which we subject them by the present Constitution, we hereby decree that they be deprived of the authority of preaching, reading in public, that is to say teaching and interpreting; and that they be also deprived ipso facto of the power of voting, either actively or passively, in all elections, without the need for any further declaration; and that also, ipso facto, without any further declaration, they shall incur the penalty of perpetual disability from preaching, reading in public, teaching and interpreting, and that it shall not be possible to absolve them from such penalty, or remove it, save through ourselves, or the Roman Pontiffs who shall succeed us.

“We also require that the same shall remain subject to any other penalties which by us, of our own free will — or by the Roman Pontiffs, our successors (according as they may decree) — shall be deemed advisable to establish, and by the present Constitution we declare them subject thereto, and hereby renew the above Decrees and Constitutions of Paul V and Gregory XV.”

–=–

Does this sound familiar?

…Believe in the validity of the U.S. Constitution without question or be ostracized and called or tried as treasonous.

The constitution, I hope it’s now plain to see, is not just the foundation of government but the foundation of all religions and cults that claim to be government.

Perhaps none in the church dare call it treason as opposed to sacrilege. But in this church and in the United States government, treason is exactly what is “unconstitutional”. For treason is to question the authority of the constitution, and the constitution is heaven sent.

Of course after the American Civil War, the treasonous (yet lawfully elected by the people) politicians of the Southern confederate states were banned from participating in the new holy government of the new United States and its new constitution with a replaced 13th amendment, and were subsequently replaced themselves by military officials of the Northern union. Never mind that the abandonment of congress by those states officially ended the Federal Government’s legitimacy stare decises.

ABANDON. To desert, surrender, forsake, or cede. To relinquish or give up with intent of never again resuming one’s right or interest. To give up or to cease to use. To give up absolutely; to forsake entirely; to renounce utterly; to relinquish all connection with or concern in; to desert. It includes the intention, and also the external act by which it is carried into effect. –Black’s 4rth Edition

The point here is that the idea of a constitution was nothing novel or new in America, and that the practice of constituting is much more ancient and Mysterious than the colonization of America, let alone the constitution of it into a debt compacted corporation. For the use of constitutions is and always has been a religious and secret societal ritual and custom, complete with sacrament oaths and holy incorporation. And to speak against such constitutions, as we read above, has always been tantamount to treason and sacrilege against God Himself.

And Holy Crusades and Holy “Civil Wars” (wars to force the civil law) follow constitutional history in all accounts.

Welcome to America…

Here is the memorial to the celebrated “Grand Army of the Republic”:

Why is it in the shape of a phallus (obelisk)?
More on this below…

Recognize the inverted 5-pointed star (pentagram)?
The eagle (phoenix) rising over the Masonic arch,
symbolized by cannons – rising out of destruction and
clasped to the corporate flag of the United States?

File:Gar medal.png
File:Gar reverse.png
The inverse side of the metal.
Surprise, surprise… the crescent and the star, the five and six-pointed star, etc…

–=–

The Grand Army of the Republic was founded on April 6, 1866, on the principles of Masonic “Fraternity, Charity and Loyalty,” in Decatur Illinois, by Benjamin F. Stephenson. It grew into a de facto (illegitimate) political arm of the Republican Party during the Reconstruction Era with over 400,000 members. The 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments are considered “reconstruction amendments”.

Ironically, a republic with an “standing” army is against the nature of a republic, especially one who conquers nations like the confederacy to force them to be under the constitution of the United States. The fallacy that the United States is an actual “republic” (a word not mentioned in the constitution) will be covered in a later section.

–=–

It is the very ritualistic nature of these mega-church-and-state religions/governments like Catholicism that should give us the first clue that something is most certainly wrong with their claims of following Christ’s teachings. For ritual and ceremony take us away from our appreciation of God as nature and its laws, making us subjects of the man-made laws (Canons) of the government of the Church.

God applying the compassesAncient of Days by William Blake, 1794

(Sun) God with his Masonic Compass at His creation of Earth…

–=–

“…when he set a compass upon the face of the depth (earth).”

Proverbs 8:27, (Christian and Hebrew Bibles)

–=–

 “Elaborate ritual and ceremony, which theoretically are designed to aid the worshiper,
usually have the opposite effect in that they tend to take the mind away from things
which are spiritual and eternal and to center it on that which is material and temporal.
Artistic ritual… often become ends in themselves, and can easily become instruments
which prevent the people from joining in the worship of God…”

–Lorraine Boettner, ‘Roman Catholicism’ (p. 273)

–=–

“Ritualism is the highway to Rome.”

–J.C. Ryle, ‘What do we owe to the Reformation?’  

–=–

“The Blue Lodge Mason is taught that the “G” in the basic Masonic symbol
represents God. Later on, he is told that it represents “deity”.
Later still, he is told that it represents “geometry”.
In reality, this letter represents the “generative principle,” the Sun-god
and, thus,the worshiped phallus, the male “generative principle…”

“In its position (along with the square and compass) on the east wall over
the chair (throne) of the Worshipful Master, it is the representation of the Sun,
|thus of the Sun-god, Osiris. Its earthly meaning, then, is of the sacred phallus;
its cosmic meaning is of the Sun, worshiped since antiquity
by pagans while facing the East.”

Ex-33 degree Mason Jim Shaw, ‘The Deadly Deception’

–=–

“The Bible is an indispensable part of the furniture of a Christian (Masonic) Lodge, because it is the sacred book of the Christian religion. The Hebrew Pentateuch in a Hebrew Lodge, and a Koran in a Mohammedan one, belong on the Alter; and one of these and a Square and Compass, properly understood, are the Great Lights by which a Mason must walk and work.”

–Albert Pike, ‘Morals and Dogma’, Page 11.

–=–

And those Deists who swear an oath (sacramentum) falsely on the Bible but swear to some other deity or god are not at all concerned about shaming the One in that Holy book. For the ceremony of sacramentum is not a Christian tenet, but the ritual of those who are anti-Christian. Masonic ritual is indeed admitted to be against the Bible and its story of Christ, as we will learn.

–=–

“The Holy Book must be opened upon the altar before a Masonic Lodge may be opened.  Freemasonry is not concerned with doctrine or dogma or sect or denomination, but only with “that natural religion in which all men agree.”  Therefore, the Holy Book is called the V.S.L. or Volume of Sacred Law or the Book of the Law If the members of a Lodge are Christian, Moslem, Jewish or Buddhist, the V.S.L. of their particular belief is opened upon their altar.  The V.S.L. is, therefore, a symbol of the revealed will and teachings of the Great Architect of the Universea name under which any Freemason can worship that Deity in Whom he puts his faith and trustMasonic dates are written “A.L.” for “Anno Lucis” or “In the year of Lightwhich is 4000 years plus the current year. i.e. the year 2001 written Masonically would be 6001.  This is because the practice has followed the ancient belief that the world was created when God said “Let there be light”, 4000 years before Christ.

One Hundred One Questions about Freemasonry’ Masonic Service Association, 1955.

–=–

And what great teachings were stated about and within the art of Masonry BEFORE CHRIST (B.C.) – to be done within the society to fellow masters of the craft without applying to or protecting the goyim and common man?

–=–

“A man should abstain from doing unto others what he would
not they should do unto him; and this is called the principle of acting on the square.”

–‘Great Learning’, 500 B.C.

–=–

“A master Mason, in teaching his apprentices, makes use of
the compasses and the square. Ye who are engaged in the pursuit of Wisdom,
must also make use of the compasses and the square.”

–Mencius, in China, around 300 B.C. 

–=–
The Canon Is Loaded
–=–

We can see the law of Canons throughout all major religions, all incorporating their political governments under these laws through their sacrament constitutions. These contractual constitutions, even as they pretend to be opposed to one another, all pledge allegiance to the same corporation of Church and State, not to God or the people.

The most common misconception with the people of America is that the constitution of the United States gives individual rights to man. But the constitution only gives the government rights and then limits those rights, for the constitution was not voted on by and was not ever for the common people. Again, people came before the constitution, and derive the natural rights from God/nature. No man derives a right from any paper that is not issued and granted by permissive acceptance through contract by government. Thus, the people consent to the unnatural political rights provided and granted by the government, while government takes its political right to assign those rights from its founding constitution and the legislation it passes.

Again, a constitution only gives rights to an incorporated body politic, not to natural men. A natural man cannot use political rights any more than his corporate artificial person can claim natural rights.

But the constitution does allow for government to bestow and revoke privileges and benefits to those people who take its mark (number) through the statutory legislative process.

When in history a country and its government (a political corporation) was newly created, expanding the land and empire of the international theocratic society of bloodline kings who funded those new government ventures, they were all started by constituting a compact of debt of allegiance to that Monarchy, which was called a “constitution”. In the United States, the people were taxed and indentured from their labors and estates, because those estates were of England and its Divine Rite through subjection. Thus, the men who came to America always claimed their rights as Englishmen under the Crown of England and not at all independent from that kingdom and its rule, which of course acted with God’s authority (permission).

As it turns out, everything that our “Founding Fathers” did in their Declaration of Independence was specifically to preserve their “natural-born rights as Englishmen“, which was in fact a perfectly legal pursuit as a crown colony.

We must discover what this dualistic word independence actually means:

INDEPENDENCE. A state of perfect irresponsibility to any superior; the United States are free and independent of all earthly power. 2. Independence may be divided into political and natural independence. By the former (political independence) is to be understood that we have contracted no tie except those which flow from the three great natural rights of safety, liberty and property. The latter (natural independence) consists in the power of being able to enjoy a permanent well-being, whatever may be the disposition of those from whom we call ourselves independent. In that sense a nation may be independent with regard to most people, but not independent of the whole world. —Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856

But let’s not forget… England was not just an “Earthly Power”, for it was ordained by the authority of God. Thus a natural independence literally could not exist at that time, as the King was God incarnate, and God was nature.

It is also important to point out the following, which lead to many other such constitutions in the colonies:

In Hartford, Connecticut, the first constitution in the American colonies, called the “Fundamental Orders,” is adopted by representatives of Wethersfield, Windsor, and Hartford.

The Dutch discovered the Connecticut River in 1614, but English Puritans from Massachusetts largely accomplished European settlement of the region. During the 1630s, they flocked to the Connecticut valley from the Massachusetts Bay Colony, and in 1638 representatives from the three major Puritan settlements in Connecticut met to set up a unified government for the new colony.

Roger Ludlow, a lawyer, wrote much of the Fundamental Orders, and presented a binding and compact frame of government that put the welfare of the community above that of individuals. It was also the first written constitution in the world to declare the modern idea that “the foundation of authority is in the free consent of the people.” In 1662, the Charter of Connecticut superseded the Fundamental Orders; though the majority of the original document’s laws and statutes remained in force until 1818.

(Source–> http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/the-first-colonial-constitution)

The word charter, as in the “Charter of Connecticut”, was just the next constitution. It was an amended version of the first. And of course the Articles of Confederation were the constitution until the U.S. constitution replaced it. So to claim that the 1789 constitution was original or unique is patently false. It simply set up and chartered “govern-ment” control of the people. And it was again replaced after the civil war, though made to look the same, to attempt to legitimize a replacement de facto government under military rule..

What did Thomas Jefferson have to say about the Declaration of Independence? Only that…

“…an appeal to the tribunal of the world was deemed proper for our justification. This was the object of the Declaration of Independence. Not to find out new principles, or new arguments, never before thought of, not merely to say things which had never been said before; but to place before mankind the common sense of the subject, in terms so plain and firm as to command their assent, and to justify ourselves in the independent stand we are compelled to take. Neither aiming at originality of principle or sentiment, nor yet copied from any particular and previous writing, it was intended to be an expression of the American mind, and to give to that expression the proper tone and spirit called for by the occasion. All its authority rests then on the harmonizing sentiments of the day, whether expressed in conversation, in letters, printed essays, or in the elementary books of public right, as Aristotle, Cicero, Locke, Sidney, &c..” –Thomas Jefferson, in a letter to Henry Lee on May 8, 1825

And of course as a mere “declaration”, this document had absolutely no legal authority. It was just a poetic “justification” for the creation of a debt compact for a central government called the U.S. constitution. It might as well have simply been an op-ed in the local newspaper, but is instead cherished as God-sent. And yet the tenets of the constitution, in case you haven’t noticed, are inherently opposed to the ones in the Declaration. The declaration talks about natural rights whereas the constitution sets up political ones, and political rights are always unnecessary unless their goal is to trample upon natural rights. And this “trick” of using some cause to justify tyrannies and more government has been used by that “constituted” government ever since.

As for just what is political independence, this is more difficult to grasp.

In the United States, for instance, our government has created many independent agencies of government. The Post Office, the Social Security Department, the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Federal Reserve System are all independent agencies of government. Remember that the word of means belonging to. These are all political agencies of government, given the power by congress to make rules and act independently of day to day oversight of that congress. But in no way are they not agencies of government. They are politically independent but certainly not naturally so. And just like Congress, the King of England and the Crown’s world empire at the time simply did not have time or ability to govern America from his throne in England. Thus each nation within the kingdom was allowed to partially govern itself (to make its own rules) while still being subjected to the laws and tithing (debt) of the Crown Temple of England.

In this way, the corporation of the United States was and is politically independent, while still run (governed) by the blood relations and great grandsons of that same King listed in the Declaration of Independence.

Do you really believe you have a “choice” in these United States family elections?

–=–

“The presidential candidate with the most royal genes and
chromosomes
has, up to now, always won the White House…”

–Burke’s Peerage researchers

–=–

“[Bush] is closely related to every European Monarch
both on and off the throne… Not one member of his family was
working class, middle class, or even middle, middle class…”

–Harold Brooks-Baker, Burke’s Peerage publishing director–

http://abcnews.go.com/International/story?id=82279&page=1

–=–

“Believe it or not, Mitt Romney and George W. Bush
are cousins — 10th cousins, twice removed, that is.”

“Romney is actually related to six past presidents —
more than any other 2012 GOP contestant. Franklin D. Roosevelt
is his eighth cousin, twice removed,
and both Calvin Coolidge and
Herbert Hoover are his 10th cousins.
Then there is his
sixth cousin (four times removed) Franklin Pierce,
and both 10th cousins Bush I and II.
Three out of these six were even (gasp!) Democrats.”

–Time Magazine–

–=–

“Obama and Palin are 10th cousins through a common ancestor
named John Smith…
As for [Rush] Limbaugh, he’s also a
10th cousin of the president – one time removed…”

“President George W. Bush? He’s related to both Obama and Palin,
the site found.
Obama and Bush are 11th cousins through
common ancestor Samuel Hinckley,
and Bush and Palin are
10th cousins one time removed, also through Hinckley –

who, and stay with us now, was John Smith’s father-in-law.”

“Obama is related to investor Warren Buffett and actor Brad Pitt.”

“Palin, the former Alaska governor and Republican
vice presidential candidate, is a
distant cousin of
both Franklin D. Roosevelt and Princess Diana.”

“In 2007, Cheney’s wife, Lynne, discovered ancestral ties between
former Vice President Dick Cheney and Obama while researching
her book.
She said the relationship was eighth cousin…”

“Palin is distant cousins with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid
and conservative author and pundit Ann Coulter…”

–Ancestry.com, via Anastasia Tyler–

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/obama-distant-cousins-palin-limbaugh-bush

–≈–

“[Bush’s] royal kin include Britain’s Queen Elizabeth II, the Queen Mother,
Duchess Sarah “Fergy” Ferguson and even the late Princess Diana.
His most prominent ancestor may be England’s King Charles II”

“Bill Clinton and Bob Dole have more in common than
wanting to be president. They are distant cousins!
However, Clinton has bluer blood, giving him an election edge”

“Bill Clinton was born William Jefferson Blythe, but took his
stepfather’s name as a teenager.
Clinton’s ancestry can be traced back,
on his mother’s side, to King Henry III
who ruled England
from 1227 to 1272. He is descended from King Robert I of France.
Furthermore, he is related to every Scottish monarch to the
current British royal family…
Clinton is related to
every ancient aristocratic family in Britain today.”

“As for John Kerry, “the 60-year-old can trace his roots back
to the first Massachusetts governor,
John Winthrop,
to every great family in Boston and to a host of royals in Europe.

Kerry can almost certainly be traced back to King James I
and to the bloodlines
straight through the Windsor and
Hanover families,” Brooks-Baker said.
“ But both candidates
have a remarkable number of royal connections
and both are related to Queen Elizabeth.”

http://thecounterpunch.hubpages.com/hub/Nearly-all-US-Presidents-are-descendant-from-the-British-and-French-Royal-Families

–=–

Anyone reading this who claims the fact that all presidents of the United States are direct descendants of the Plantagenet kings of England, including Obama, is just a coincidence or some silly degree of separation, then you may as well stop reading and go back to the enter-tain-ment that govern-ment provides as a service to its subjects right now.

But why were the bloodline colonists of America even to this day so interested in retaining their English-born rights ordained by the Church (Canons) to rule the common man?

Because that’s where their inherent and inseparable divine right and rite to rule under God comes from!

Samuel Adams wrote in 1772:

“All persons born in the British American Colonies are, by the laws of God and nature and by the common law of England, exclusive (subjects) of all charters from the Crown, well entitled, and by acts of the British Parliament are declared to be entitled, to all the natural, essential, inherent, and inseparable rights, liberties, and privileges of subjects born in Great Britain or within the realm. – The Rights of the Colonists: The Report of the Committee of Correspondence to the Boston Town Meeting, Nov. 20, 1772.

Resolution #2 of the Declaration of Rights of the Stamp Act Congress on October 19, 1765, was written:

“That His Majesty’s liege subjects in these colonies are entitled to all the inherent rights and privileges of his natural born subjects within the kingdom of Great Britain.

The “Charter of Massachusetts Bay (colony)” issued by the king in 1629 proclaimed that the people of the colony:

…shall have and enjoy all liberties and Immunities of free and naturall Subjects within any of the Domynions of Us, our Heires or Successors, to all Intents, Constructions, and Purposes whatsoever, as if they and everie of them were borne within the Realme of England.

And today, Americans claim rights from a paper constitution chartered and paid for by Britain and Her subjects who rule by blood relation to that Crown Temple. And like fools we call this independence and freedom.

The colonists who came to America wanted nothing more than and in fact insisted upon being treated as natural-born Englishmen with all rights and privileges thereof and under the king but in the King’s land of America. This was reflected in every facet of the New America (New England). And it is part of the basis of the falsity of sentiment of the time in the term God-given natural rights, as the “king” was considered to be of “God” – the “divine” right of kings – under which rights were granted to the King’s (God’s) subjects.

Today, the people still believe that the constitution is divine, and that like the divine rite of kings, somehow that divine constitution gives them rights over and despite God and nature.

Perhaps it is easier to understand the sentiment of the time towards breaking away from that kingdom of Britain by the actual people of the colonies if we consider the sentiment of the people of the Untied States today being forced into the international body politic of the United Nations and excepting its own “constitution” – The International Declaration of Human Rights. This is the incremental process of constitutionalism that for centuries has conquered nations, America included. Our leaders tell us its good to be a member of the U.N. just as the same bloodline Masons and cousins of our current government told the colonists back in the late 1780’s that membership in the “United States” as a “federation” under a “constitution” was good for them. And though the people still believe that their rights are derived from the constitution that founded the United States instead of realizing they come from God (nature) and that a constitution is opposed to natural rights, they are being dragged into that United Nations as their new sovereign world government without a fight, like sheep to the slaughter. And the people of the United States of America who fight in the military are now fighting not to preserve the United States of America, but to preserve the transference of America into that international government even when it is against their best interests. For the United States military is now the “peace-keeping” military of the world, attacking all manner of nations around the world to ensure United Nations world governance friendly governments can be constituted throughout all the world’s people. This is the cause used to declare the right to constitute new govern-ments and charter new debt compacts (constitutions) all across the world. And the people, as with the colonists, blindly follow their Masonic leaders and died for their causes, most believing that their actions were ordained by God Himself. And they never comprehend that all the world is just a stage, and that these wars are all funded by the same central government that has always controlled (governed) the minds of men through ritual and ceremony.

–=–

“Every Masonic lodge is a temple of religion; and its teachings are instruction in religion… Masonry, like all religions, all the Mysteries, Hermeticism and Alchemy, conceals its secrets from all except the Adepts and Sages, or the Elect, and uses false explanations and misinterpretations of its symbols to misleadto conceal the Truth, which it calls Light, from them, and to draw them away from it… The truth must be kept secret, and the masses need a teaching proportioned to their imperfect reason… every man’s conception of God must be proportioned to his mental cultivation, and intellectual powers, and moral excellence. God is, as man conceives him, the reflected image of man himself… The true name of Satan, the Kabalists say, is that of Yahveh reversed; for Satan is not a black godLucifer, the Light Bearer! Strange and mysterious name to give to the Spirit of Darkness! Lucifer, the Son of the Morning! Is it he who bears the Light… Doubt it not!”

–Albert Pike, Morals And Dogma

–=–

This process of Masonic constitutionalism that thus formed the new corporation of the United States can be seen not only in the founding of most other political governments, but also in the religions/churches that prop them up.

For instance, the Protestant Episcopal Church was incorporated into the United States in the year 1789, just months after the United States was created through its own legal constitution. Of course a constitution, as we will soon learn, is actually a pledge to another entity – in this case a pledge as a member of the See of Canterbury by this United States corporation of religion – and was a pledge of allegiance and of financial responsibility to fund and support the crown of England as head of that church.

And none dare call it treason…

The Archbishop of Canterbury is the senior primate and chief religious figure of the Church of England (where the current queen Elizabeth II is the British sovereign and Supreme governor of the church). The Archbishop chairs the General Synod, sits or chairs many of the church’s important boards and committees, and plays a central part in national ceremonies such as coronations – the anointment of Monarchs to God-like (Christos) status. As holder of one of the “five great sees” (the others being York, London, Durham, and Winchester), the Archbishop of Canterbury is ex officio (by virtue of that office) one of the Lords Spiritual of the House of Lords. He is one of the highest-ranking men in England and the highest ranking non-royal in the United Kingdom’s order of precedence. Since Henry VIII broke with Rome, the Archbishops of Canterbury have been selected by the English (British since the Act of Union in 1707) monarch. Today the choice is made in the name of the monarch by the prime minister, from a shortlist of two selected by an ad-hoc committee called the Crown Nominations Commission.

Here is the preamble of the constitution for the Episcopal Church that was formed in the United States:

–=–

Constitution & Canons
Together with the Rules of Order
For the government of the Protestant Episcopal Church
in the United States of America
Otherwise Known as
The Episcopal Church

PREAMBLE – The Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America, otherwise known as The Episcopal Church (which name is hereby recognized as also designating the Church), is a constituent member of the Anglican Communion, a Fellowship within the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church, of those duly constituted Dioceses, Provinces, and regional Churches in communion with the See of Canterbury, upholding and propagating the historic Faith and Order as set forth in the Book of Common Prayer. This Constitution, adopted in General Convention in Philadelphia in October, 1789, as amended in subsequent General Conventions, sets forth the basic Articles for the government of this Church, and of its overseas missionary jurisdictions.

–=–

Philadelphia… the “City of Brotherly Love”.

Here we see that even though the Protestent and Catholic churches are split and seemingly opposed in many respects, it was constituted in allegiance and debt with the central Church and State under the canons of ancient Masonic Roman law.

And let’s face it, the Church of England is simply the Church of Rome with divorce allowed – the purpose for thenHenry the VIII as King of England in making the illusion of division in the first place. There was no war, no fight, not even a skirmish between this separation. Not like when America declared independence form England. Go figure…

Of course Bloody Mary subsequently reinstated the Catholic Church while burning folks at the stake in its name, but then it was abolished again. What a lovely history.

The term re-in-state should be an obvious indication that the church is the state no matter what banner it flies or Bible it pretends to rule with.

The meme in America that the constitution of the United States is unique, original, special, inherent, organic, good, or even that it is the “law of the land” is a result of the lack of knowledge as to just what a constitution actually is… a compact of indebtedness and thus allegiance to another. In essence, a constitution is nothing more than the “Articles of Incorporation” or a “charter”. In fact, I’m positive that the reader has often heard the constitution referred to in America as the “Charter for Freedom”.

Now, remembering that Bouvier’s Law Dictionary of 1856 was commissioned and officially accepted by government, let’s find out what a constitution really is:

CONSTITUTIONcontracts. The constitution of a contract, is the making of the contract as, the written constitution of a debt.

CONSTITUTORcivil law. He who promised by a simple pact to pay the debt of another; and this is always a principal obligation.

CONSTITUENTHe who gives authority to another to act for him.

TO CONSTITUTEcontracts. To empower, to authorize. In the common form of letters of attorney, these words occur, “I nominate, constitute and appoint.”

CONSTITUIMUS – A Latin word which signifies we constitute. Whenever the king of England is vested with the right of creating a new office, he must use proper words to do so, for example, erigimus, constituimus…

And just what is an attorney anyway?

From Black’s Law 4rth:

ATTORN. To turn over; to transfer to another money or goods; to assign to some particular use or service. To consent to the transfer of a rent or reversion. To agree to become tenant to one as owner or landlord of an estate previously held of another, or to agree to recognize a new owner of a property or estate and promise payment of rent to him.

ATTORNARE. Latin. To attorn; to transfer or turn over; to appoint an attorney or substitute.

ATTORNATUS. One who is attorned, or put in the place of another; a substitute; hence, an attorney.

ATTORNE. Latin. French. In old English law. An attorney.

ATTORNEY. In the most general sense this term denotes an agent or substitute, or one who is appointed and authorized to act in the place or stead of another. An agent, or one acting on behalf of another. One who is put in place, stead, and turn of another to manage his matters of law. An agent employed by party to case to manage it for him.

Now do you understand? Do you see anywhere that a constitution gives the people any rights? Do you understand now that a constitution is a debt contract giving authority through attorn-ment (turning over the mind) to government to act on your behalf (power of attorney), even against your best interests?

Need more proof? Let’s take a look at the constitution…

Article 6 of the constitution states very clearly that the United States was constituted as a debtor nation:

All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.”

There was never independence if this country was founded in Debt and Engagement to England and France.

We know what the word Debt means, but what about the word Engagements?

ENGAGEMENT. This word is frequently used in the French law to signify not only a contract, but the obligations arising from a quasi contract. The terms obligations and engagements, are said to be synonymous; but the Code seems specially to apply the term engagement to those obligations which the law, imposes on a man without the intervention of any contract, either on the part of the obligor or the obligee.

In the case of the United States, the constitution specifically notes here that the debts and obligations of contract owed to other nations at the signing of that constitution were still valid (to France and Great Britain). Ironically, the great American dream has been promoted in very much the same way, where mortgage, college, and credit debt (loan) contracts are somehow the way to be a free people.

And have you ever considered that “freedom” of religion means protection of all religions, including Lucifarian, Demonology, the Church of Satan, Atheism, and of course most importantly the Deism of Free and Accepted Masonry and other government approved secret societies and cults?

And the people have a choice:

Be debt free and free men as a non-citizens…

Or accept citizenship where debt slavery is surety to the government granted privilege of freedom.

In reality, the term Debt is freedom could not be a more true statement. For government grants freedom as a privilege to its subjects without them even knowing it is a privilege; one not being derived from a natural right. Remember the dollar and its trust of god? The word freedom is perhaps the most misused, misunderstood word in the history of all words. Freedom is actually defined as the positive (forced) right to obey the government’s sacred articles of law.

A political or positive right is the right to have something forced upon you by the lawmaker.

While a negative or natural right is the right to NOT ever have anything forced upon you.

Free = outside of man’s law, in harmony with nature under God.

Freedom = obey the law of man.

Man’s law = pay your debt, be subject, obey, or else.

This definition (freedom = obedience to government law) can be found in any legal dictionary that you might read. We will certainly define legally the word freedom later in this presentation as we walk through the many fallacies of the constitution and the United States. For being free in nature and having government-granted freedom are two completely opposite ideas; directly opposed to one another. A positive right inherently and necessarily cancels out a negative right, just as man has attempted to conquer nature itself.

Read my in depth essay on this subject, an integral understanding of the duality of what a right really is, here:

Link–> https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2013/02/19/tyranny-requires-equality/

–=–
Freaky Phallic Founders
–=–

The political laymen in their pious deliberations of law among those within the law society conduct their business in arched temples designed after the Holy Roman Empire and based on the Sacred Geometry of Freemasonry – the Mystery Religions. And all of those ancient symbols abound and adorn those government temples (see pictures throughout this essay). And they use the Holy Bible as a symbolic prop (furniture) to fool the people while swearing the sacra-ment oath to their own Masonic Deity that cares not about the Bible… other than to recognize it and “Christianity” as a “problem” for the Masonic constitution and rule.

Republican Rome has been a model for most major governments around the world, requiring that all laws go (pass) through two legislative bodies. It is also outlined in almost every “democratic” constitution that created new nations. In fact, Thomas Jefferson intended for some of his buildings to resemble the Roman temples, which he described as “one of the most beautiful, if not the most beautiful and precious morsel of architecture left us by antiquity.”

–=–

**Note that the Egyptian obelisk is a phallic symbol
worshiping the god Osiris and sun god Ra, and in less
common understanding denotes “Baal” worship.

–=–

“…the linham [male phallus] was an upright pillar.”

–W.Wynn Wescott, ‘Numbers: Their Occult Power and Mystic Virtues’,
Theosophical Publishing Society, 1902, p.33

–=–

Picture
Solar Temple of Nyuserr, Abusir, L’Archelologie Egypteinne,
Drawing, Gaston Maspero, 1907


Obelisk in New York’s Central Park

Cleopatra's Needle in Paris
Obelisk in Paris, France

The seventh obelisk that triggers the climax of Obelisk Seven
Cleopatras Needle (obelisk)  in London by dome


The Washington Monument obelisk
in a circle of flags.

–=–

“The Washington Monument, which lies directly west of the Capitol, is an obelisk, a tall, four-sided stone pillar tapering toward a pyramidal top. Some people believe that this is the most significant occult symbol of all. Most people are aware that an obelisk is Egyptian in origin, but few know the story behind it, and fewer still that it is an important Masonic symbol. In fact, the four obelisks which sit in four major Western cities, Paris, London, New York, and Washington, D.C., were erected specifically because of the efforts of, and large sums of money donated by, prominent and powerful nineteenth century Freemasons.”

–Michael Bradley Ph.D, ‘Secrets of the Freemasons’, ch. 8, p. 163, 2006

–=–

“King Jehu said to the guards and to the officers, ‘Go in and slay them; let none escape’. And they smote them with the sword; and the guards before the king threw their bodies out, and went into the inner dwelling of the house of Baal.
They brought out the obelisks [pillars] of the house of Baal and burned them.”

–2 Kings 10:26, (Amplified Bible)

–=–

“You shall make for your self no idols nor shall you erect a graven image,
pillar
, or obelisk, nor shall you place any figured stone in your land
to which or on which to bow down; for I Am The Lord your God”.

–Leviticus 26:1 (Amplified Bible)

–=–

“Now when all this was finished, all Israel present there went out to the cities of
Judah and broke in pieces the pillars or obelisks, cut down the asherim,
and threw down the high places [of idolatry] and the altars in all Judah and Benjamin,
in Ephraim and Manasseh, until they had utterly destroyed them all”.

–2 Chronicles 31:1 (Amplified Bible)
(The “asherim” signify the “asherah poles”.)

–=–


Stone obelisk marking the grave of U.S. President James Madison,
the nation’s fourth president and father of the U.S. Constitution.


President Thomas Jefferson’s obelisk grave-site

–=–

“Before his death, Thomas Jefferson left specific instructions for a monument
to be constructed on his grave site.  In reference to the words to be
placed on his gravestone, Jefferson said,On the faces of the Obelisk
the following inscription, & not a word more.’1 He continued by writing,
‘because by these, as testimonials that I have lived, I wish most to be remembered.’

–1 The Library of Congress: Thomas Jefferson Exhibit

–=–


President Abraham Lincoln’s Grave-site

Zachary Taylor
President Zachary Taylor’s Grave-site

Gravesite of William Howard Taft: Arlington Cemetery
Grave of President William Taft


President William Henry Harrison’s Grave-site


President Millard Fillmore Grave with pink obelisk


Obelisk commemorating the history of Morrow County

“WARREN G. HARDING — Morrow County’s favorite son”


Grave-site of President Warren G. Harding

–=–

“No man ever took the oaths and subscribed to the obligations
with greater watchfulness and care than I exercised in
receiving the various rites of Masonry, and I say with due
deliberation and without fear of breaking the faith.
I have never encountered a lesson, never witnessed an example,
never heard an obligation uttered which could not be
openly proclaimed to the world.”

–President of the United States, Warren G. Harding.

–=–

Martin Van Buren
President Martin Van Buren’s Grave-site


President Andrew Johnson’s Grave with veiled obelisk


President Franklin Peirce’s obelisk grave marker

And on and on…

–=–

MASONIC BURIAL ILUSTRATION - IMAGE TAKEN FROM MASONIC FAMILY MAGAZINE, 1878
“The Masonic Burial”
Image from Masonic Family Magazine, 1878

–=–

“The obelisk is the most commonly used and the most blatant occult symbol used throughout the world. In ancient Egypt, the cult of this phallic symbol was associated with the god Osiris, who was cut in 13 pieces by Seth. Isis traveled far and beyond to retrieve all of Osiris’ body parts and was successful, except for one body part, the penis, which was swallowed by a fish. ‘The lost phallus’ is thus representative of male energy, and is almost always placed inside a circle, which represents female genitalia and energy. The obelisk in the middle of a circle represents the sexual act and the union of opposite forces. In our modern world, obelisks are found on nearly all important landmarks, and thus became and symbol of the occult elite’s power.”

–The Vigilant Citizen, Article on Sinister Sites – Israel Supreme Court, June 24th, 2009)

–=–


An obelisk in Vermont marking the birthplace of Mormon founder
and president Joseph Smith, cousin of L. Ron Hubbard and George Bush.

Chase Frost, 3, Steve Blanchard, Troy Frost, 5, and Jamie Frost, all of Tunbridge, visit the animals at the Joseph Smith Birthplace Memorial in Royalton yesterday. More than 160,000 lights are illuminated around the monument. (Valley News - Ryan Dorgan)
In Vermont, the innocent nature of members (the people) within the
Mormon Church can be seen as they celebrate Christ’s birth in front
of the phallic Egyptian obelisk commemorating the birth of  Joseph Smith.

Other leaders and presidents of the Mormon corporation that have obelisks as
tombstones include John Taylor, Lorenzo Snow, Hyrum Smith, and others.


“This white obelisk, dedicated in July 1921, served as the first
permanent marker erected to commemorate the arrival of
the Mormon pioneers into the Salt Lake Valley in 1847.”

–Utah State Historical Society

–=–


Seventh Day Adventist Church
Bella Vista Mayaguez, Puerto Rico

THE WHITE'S OBELISK SHOWING THE SIDE OF ELLEN WHITE
Battle Creek, Michigan Grave-site of Ellen G. White (Seventh-Day Adventist “Prophet”)
and her husband James White (President of Seventh Day Adventist General Conferences)

–=–

My accompanying angel presented before me some of the errors
of those present, and also the truth in contrast with their errors.”

Ellen White, Testimonies for the Church, vol. 1, pp. 84-87

–=–

OBELISK OF J.N. ANDREWS AT THE WOLF-GOTTESAKER IN BASEL, SWITZERLAND (PHOTO BY MATTHIAS MUELLER)
Grave-site of J.N. Andrews in Basil. Switzerland
Seventh-day Adventist Church founder and also the 3rd elected President of the SDA
General Conference, editor of the Review and Herald (1869-1870) now the Adventist Review

Obelik of E.L.H Chamberlain
Grave of Adventist pioneer E.L.H. Chamberlain, Middletown Cn

JOHN THOMAS OBELISK - FOUNDER OF THE CHRISTADELPHIANS CULT
John Thomas, Founder of Chrisadelphians cult

“The Christadelphians have been with us since about 1848. They rose up after the Mormons, but prior to the Jehovah’s Witnesses and the Seventh-day Adventists. A man named John Thomas founded the group. The Disciples of Christ denomination attempted to discipline this man for his “strange doctrines,” but the discipline was not accepted by him. John Thomas drew off his own followers under their original name, the Royal Association of Believers in New York, now known as the Christadelphians.”

— Article from Jubilee International Inc. website


Jane Addams Memorial Park in Chicago, Illinois
founder of the Woman’s International League for Peace and Freedom (WILPF)
and first US woman to win the Nobel Peace Prize (1931).
Her husband was the Founder of the Illinois Republican Party.

OBELISK LOCATED AT THE DOROTHY DE ROTHSCHILD GROVE, ISRAEL SUPREME COURT
Dorothy De Rothschild Grove,
at the Israel Supreme Court

https://i1.wp.com/novusordoseclorum.com/files/2013/02/Philippine-Rothschild-Devil-Necklace.jpgPhilippine Rothschild - Devil Necklace
Baroness Philippine Mathilde Camille de Rothschild
(Rothschild Banking Family)
Here she is shown confidently showcasing her Lucifarian jewelry,
with her Satan and Baphomet (goat) Necklaces.

MASSIVE OBELISK ON TOP OF AMERICAN BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINAR IN NASHVILLE, TN
American Baptist Theological Seminar
Nashville, Tn

Charles Wesley, Sr
Grave of Charles Wesley, composer of over 8,000 hymns,
whose brother John Wesley founded Methodism.


Grave-site of John Wesley, founder of Methodism


–=–

“The spires and pinnacles with which our old churches are decorated indeed, all uprights, including all the architectural families, and the varieties of tors, towers, and steeples, the especial mark and glory of Christian building, come from these ancient symbols. They are everywhere indicative of the Phallus, or index-finger denoting the “Fire”, the aspiring fire, against the inclination of gravity, which was the first vitalized idea, or Idol, worshiped magically and philosophically, the enlivening, godlike Power.”

–Hargrave Jennings (1817-1890), British Freemason, Rosicrucian and author on occultism and esotericism, “Phallicism: Celestial and Terrestrial; Heathen and Christian and its Connection with the Rosicrucian and the Gnostics and its foundation in Buddhism”, (p. 72, 1884)

–=–