Is Math Destroying Our Perception Of Reality?


(Author’s Note: This can be considered a slightly modified chapter for the distant release of my book called Gleaming The Matrix. With current events in synthetic biology and other insanities, I felt it to be needed right about now. Please enjoy.)

It is said that money, or more precisely the love of money, is the root of all evil. And yet, what is the sum of all pretended types of money if not the mere fictional representation of a manmade, fixed mathematical equation; a false, artificial valuation assigned by some pretended “problem” to be solved consisting in a non-existent form symbolized as some actual, Real substance? Value is a mathematical term. Sum is a mathematical term. Equation is a mathematical term. One, five, ten, twenty, fifty, and one-hundred, when describing money’s artificial valuation, are all mathematical terms. Simply stated, money is just math personified. This personification and artificial valuation is also known as the anthropomorphized god of mammon.

And so this begs the question: Can math ever be Truth?

If mammon is the metaphorical false god of monetary valuation, that is, wealth and riches, then it must be said that the underlying language art, logicality, and indeed science of mammon is merely mathematics. No math, no value. No value, no false-reality.

And so perhaps having and taking only one god makes a bit more sense when money is seen as just a problem of math, the term problem being as well a mathematical term. Worship Truth or worship the price tag of abandoning Truth, for Truth has no value to be worshiped. It is priceless. No amount of money can actually change or alter the Truth. And only the false perception of this artificially applied mathematical valuation can influence man to be the destroyer of Truth, to act against his own best interest, and to therefore become the satanic devil (agent of evil) he so fears. For with a false valuation in anything, necessarily, at the same time, comes an equal lack of respect in the self-evident, self-existent Truth of that thing. Therefore, the mere idea of mammon can ultimately destroy all things, but only through the minds and subsequent actions of the corrupted, delusional men it infects, for such a false god exists nowhere else but in the imagination of weak, mind-controlled (governed) men.

Even the so-called sciences have been corrupted by the worship of ownership value through patent rights, where science no longer studies Creation (Nature) but strives to reinvent Nature (Truth) in its own image. For the Truth cannot be patented. There is no value in Truth unless it can be kept secret from good men – this being the very foundation of all royal houses, their rulers, and clandestine secret societies. A false representation, a symbol, an artifice of valuation must be attached to the Truth for It to become the object of desire and greed. Only the image, not the Source, can be controlled by the power of mammon. And so men must be made to worship the image, the idol, the symbol of the Real if we are to be controlled by that false art form. Truth is no longer seen, only the artificial valuation thereof, making the Law of Nature untenable and without authority over the confused mind and spirit of the worshipers of mammon. For mammon is directly opposed to Nature (YHVH) and Its Law (LOGOS). These rulers and administrative governments (corporations) are not the bearers or protectors of Truth, for power only comes through the obfuscation and removal of Truth from any equation. Power, authority, relies solely, 100% upon on the organized, fictional artifice cast like a spell upon willfully ignorant men. Science is no longer done or published for the benefit of or from Truth, is no longer Natural, for mammon is become the god of corporate scientists. No profit, no science.

By all means, test yourself in this matter…

Do you see the priceless beauty in all things within Creation (Nature), or do you see only the false, monetary (mathematical) value assigned to it by evil men acting in incorporated institutions (artificial persons)? Perhaps you somehow see both at the same time, having two gods continuously pulling at your spirit in an endless value of self-control and empathy? The Bible is clear, do not worship anything of Truth (YHVH) or of Christ (LOGOS) with respect of persons (i.e. corporations). So should we put our trust in the Gold Fixing set at the Rothschild Bank in the City of London for the supposed daily market “value” of gold? Moreover, will even men of good conscious and moral rectitude ever be able to overcome this corruption of the mind and spirit, this root of all evil, in order to recognize gold for what it actually is – as a priceless part of Nature? If, when asked what gold is, your automatic, rote answer is some form of “money” or jewelry for show, then you may already be destroyed by your lack of inherent (True) knowledge, as predicted.

Do you measure land by its beauty and priceless Nature of self-Existence and self-Evidence, or do you measure it by its value in mathematically calculated acres, miles, hectares, feet, etc., as represented by the false, monetary valuation thereof?

Are trees a priceless treasure to be loved and protected, or are they a valuable commodity on the securities and exchange markets?

Are all men Naturally free, or are men merely some mathematical formulation of value as various forms of voluntary and involuntary slaves, subjects, employees… commodities to be used (employed) for mere sale and extortion? And just how do you decide which men are free and which have value? (Actually, that’s a trick question: you don’t. Your masters do!)

What is a spiritual awakening but the uncomfortable ability to recognize ones own corruption in the legal, mathematical construct of mammon? And what so-called “Christian” stemming from today’s corporate religions can say that mammon is in fact not their chosen god? Sadly, in this regard, Christ has no True followers, for the followers of Christ must worship Truth in all things.

Everything we see, feel, touch, taste, and smell has been cursed with some ultimately meaningless estimation of artificial, mathematical valuation. We pay for meaningless (valueless) sex, or inversely prostitute ourselves for that money. We eat bad food because it’s pretended value is less than good food. We are conned into adopting children of some racial ethnicity (family) not our own because they are somehow cheaper and less in demand in an almost black market of orphaned kids, a market causing its own need for child trafficking to support it. We purchase plastic bracelets that supposedly represent recycling, like a guilt tax on our own wasteful behavior, bearing them in false show of our non-existent activism, our hypocritical non-action. In the end, through these daily and lifelong calculations of worth and valuation, we prove our love of money more than Life (self-Existence) itself. Everything, every action, every duty, every promise, and every limit can be bought and sold like a financial instrument on the dark market of our wretched, reaped souls. All disease is contracted, and the sickness of poverty and wealth are certainly no exceptions.

Of course, this word love carries the more ancient meaning of belief in something, specifically in the “value” of anything. Another word for this type of consideration is affection:

–=–

MAMMONnoun – Riches; wealth; or the god of riches. Ye cannot serve God and mammon. Matthew 6:24. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

MAMMONIST – noun – A person devoted to the acquisition of wealth; one whose affections are placed supremely on riches; a worldling… (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

AFFECTION – noun1. The state of being affected. [Little Used.] 2. Passion; but more generally, 3. A bent of mind towards a particular object, holding a middle place between disposition, which is natural, and passion, which is excited by the presence of its exciting object. Affection is a permanent bent of the mind, formed by the presence of an object, or by some act of another person, and existing without the presence of its object. 4. In a more particular sense, a settled good will, love or zealous attachment; as, the affection of a parent for his child... 5. Desire; inclination; propensity, good or evil; as, virtuous or vile affections. Romans 1:31Galatians 5:24. 6. In a general sense, an attribute, quality or property, which is inseparable from its object; as, love, fear and hope are affections of the mind; figure, weight, etc., are affections of bodies. 7. Among physicians, a disease, or any particular morbid state of the body; as, a gouty affection; hysteric affection. 8. In painting, a lively representation of passion. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

FIGURE – noun – fig’ur. [Latin figura, from figo, to fix or setSee Feign.] 1. The form of any thing as expressed by the outline or terminating extremities. Flowers have exquisite figures. A triangle is a figure of three sides. A square is a figure of four equal sides and equal angles. 2. Shape; form; person; as a lady of elegant figure. A good figure or person, in man or woman, gives credit at first sight to the choice of either. 3. Distinguished appearance; eminence; distinction; remarkable character. Ames made figure in Congress; Hamilton, in the cabinet. 4. Appearance of any kind; as an ill figure; a mean figure. 5. Magnificence; splendor; as, to live in figure and indulgence. 6. A statue; an image; that which is formed in resemblance of something else; as the figure of a man in plaster. 7. Representation in painting; the lines and colors which represent an animal, particularly a person; as the principal figures of a picture; a subordinate figure. 8. In manufactures, a design or representation wrought on damask, velvet and other stuffs. 9. In logic, the order or disposition of the middle term in a syllogism with the parts of the question. 10. In arithmetic, a character denoting a number; as 2. 7. 9. 11. In astrology, the horoscope; the diagram of the aspects of the astrological houses. 12. In theology, type; representative13. In rhetoric, a mode of speaking or writing in which words are deflected from their ordinary signification, or a mode more beautiful and emphatical than the ordinary way of expressing the sense; the language of the imagination and passions; as, knowledge is the light of the mind; the soul mounts on the wings of faith; youth is the morning of life. In strictness, the change of a word is a trope, and any affection of a sentence a figure; but these terms are often confounded. 14. In grammar, any deviation from the rules of analogy or syntax... – verb transitive – fig’ur. 1. To form or mold into any determinate shape. Accept this goblet, rough with figured gold. 2. To show by a corporeal resemblance, as in picture or statuary. 3. To cover or adorn with figures or images; to mark with figures; to form figures in by art; as, to figure velvet or muslin. 4. To diversify; to variegate with adventitious forms of matter. 5. To represent by a typical or figurative resemblance. The matter of the sacraments figureth their end. 6. To imagine; to image in the mind. 7. To prefigure; to foreshow. 8. To form figuratively; to use in a sense not literal; as figured expressions. [Little Used.] 9. To note by charactersverb intransitive – To make a figure; to be distinguished. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

FEIGN – verb transitive – fane. [Latin fingo. The Latin forms fictum, fictus, whence figura, figure, also fucus.] 1. To invent or imagine; to form an idea or conception of something not real. There are no such things done as thou sayest, but thou feignest them out of thine own heart. Nehemiah 6:8. 2. To make a show of; to pretend; to assume a false appearance; to counterfeit... She feigns a laugh… 3. To represent falsely; to pretend; to form and relate a fictitious tale. 4. To dissemble; to conceal. obsolete. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

–=–

As I have attempted to explain within this blog, in my books, and on my Red Pill Sunday School series of lesson-based shows, the concept of what is Real (Truth) and what is artificial (manmade) is also exactly what the term God (as expressed in the “name” YHVH) was intended and is defined as, regardless of the false images of religions and the spiritless, commissioned artists of church and state. God is Truth. The Truth (God) will set you free. The temple of God (Truth) is in you. But the great destroyer, mammon (artificial mathematical valuation), kills the spirit and promotes greed and desire, want over need, and especially a disrespect of the Natural, priceless value (Nature/Self-Existence and Self-Evidence) of Life Itself. In other words, this false valuation of Nature and our own place within it causes men to believe they are false gods, with some dreamed up sovereignty that allows a total disregard and disrespect toward the private rights and sovereignty of everything else in Nature; toward the inherent right of self-Existence in all things, toward Life Itself. And this is why no man can worship both these gods at once, for one is the Truth of Nature and one is wholly opposed to and thus anti-Nature. One cannot worship Truth while caught in a web of lies.

–=–

“What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost which is in you, 
which ye have of God, and ye are not your own?”

‘Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you?”

“If any man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroy; for the temple of God is holy, which temple ye are.”

“And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people.”

–1Corintheans 3: 16-17, 2 Corintheans 6: 16, 19, KJB

–=–

Now go back and read these same verses, replacing the word God (YHVH) with the word Truth:

–=–

“What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost (Spirit) which is in you, 
which ye have of Truth, and ye are not your own?”

‘Know ye not that ye are the temple of Truth, and that the Spirit of Truth dwelleth in you?”

“If any man defile the temple of Truth, him shall Truth destroy; for the temple of Truth is holy, which temple ye are.”

“And what agreement hath the temple of Truth with idols? for ye are the temple of the living Truth; as Truth hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their Truth, and they shall be my people.”

–1Corintheans 3: 16-17, 2 Corintheans 6: 16, 19, KJB

–=–

Now go back and read these same verses, replacing the word God (YHVH) with the word Nature:

–=–

“What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost (Spirit) which is in you, 
which ye have of Nature, and ye are not your own?”

‘Know ye not that ye are the temple of Nature, and that the Spirit of Nature dwelleth in you?”

“If any man defile the temple of Nature, him shall Nature destroy; for the temple of Nature is holy, which temple ye are.”

“And what agreement hath the temple of Nature with idols? for ye are the temple of the living Nature; as Nature hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their Nature, and they shall be my people.”

–1Corintheans 3: 16-17, 2 Corintheans 6: 16, 19, KJB

–=–

What you cannot do is replace the word YHVH with the word mammon, or math, or sacred geometry.

There simply is no Truth (YHVH) in math. Math is not of Nature, but of the logic-based minds of men. The symbol, the valuation, is never the Reality. There is no truth in mammon. There is no truth in money. These are not of Nature. Therefore, there is no true valuation of Nature in money.

Translation: you must believe in money and its supposed value for it to exist. Thus, it is the LOVE (BELIEF) in money that is the root of all evil. With this understanding we can no longer pretend that loving money and using money are in any way different actions. Sorry…

The requirements for being Truth, that is, the requisite state of Being for anything considered to be of and under the Law and Laws of Nature (YHVH) include nothing of the art of mathematics. They cannot actually be purchased with money in Reality, only in the mind. Yet that artificial action of commerce and the flattering reciept of fictional, flattering title that is pretended to be Real is at the root of our trespass against YHVH and Its Law. These requirements, these inherent traits are, indeed, solely as follows:

  1. Self-Evidence – It must be a “Creation” of, in, and under Nature and Its Law, a Creation of YHVH (God). It must be Naturally occurring. In other words, the proof or “evidence” of its existence is not a requirement for its existence, but rather its very Natural (obvious/self-evident) inherent existence proves itself to exist. Thus, it is part of the Supreme Being (verb) that is Truth (YHVH). Nature (Truth) is self-evident in all Its parts.
  2. Self-Existence – Likewise, that which is REAL, exists only in TRUTH (without title, artificial property, or false valuation), in and because of itself (YHVH – I AM THAT I AM). This again requires no proofs stemming from man’s designs or language arts, for that which Exists does so despite what man names, references, or compares it to. A noun (name) is certainly not any proof of Existence, for a name (noun) is purely an invention and property of man’s imagination and language arts. Thus “Creation”, which is the ongoing, never-ending “Being” of Nature (all that is not manmade), and which is not to be confused with a single point in man’s limited imagination and artificial timeline of what “history” is, constitutes only that which is Truth, that which Exists or comes into Existence due to the forces and Law(s) of Nature.

What is adversary to Truth? Only one thing, actually, being that which is manmade.

When we look for an answer as to what an act of Nature (Truth) is, especially in the legal realm of artificial things, we find the same conceptualization of that which is self-evident and self-existent, the term Nature merely pointing to the Supreme self-existence of what is YHVH (God), a power that is not of man, is uncontrollable, unpredictable, and especially not mathematical. This power must be specifically defined by the legal system, especially in insurance policies, and so is referenced simply and Truthfully as an “act of God” (YHVH).

Act Of God – Event that directly and exclusively results from the occurrence of natural causes that could not have been prevented by the exercise of foresight or caution; an inevitable accident. Courts have recognized various events as acts of God – Tornatoes, earhquakes, death, extraordinarily high tides, violent winds, and floods. Many insurance policies for property damage exclude from their protection damage caused by acts of God. (–West’s Encyclopedia of American Law, Edition 2)

Act Of God – (noun) – A natural catastrophe which no one can prevent such as an earthquake, a tidal wave, a volcanic eruption, or a tornado. Acts of God are significant for two reasons: 1) for the havoc and damage they wreak, and 2) because often contracts state that “acts of God” are an excuse for delay or failure to fulfill a commitment or to complete a construction project. Many insurance policies exempt coverage for damage caused by acts of God, which is one time an insurance company gets religion. At times disputes arise as to whether a violent storm or other disaster was an act of God (and therefore exempt from a claim) or a foreseeable natural event. (–God knows the answer!, Gerald N. Hill and Kathleen T. Hill)

Act Of God – An accident or event that cannot be prevented by ordinary human foresight. The occurrence should normally be a natural one, like flood or earthquake. IT EXEMPTS A PARTY FROM STRICT LIABILITY IN COMMON LAW, an by definition, from negligence. (–Collins Dictionary of Law, 2006)

Act Of God – In contracts. This phrase denotes those accidents which arise from physical causes, and which cannot be prevented. 2. Where the law casts a duty on a party, the performance shall be excused, if it be rendered impossible by the act of God; but where the party, by his own contract, engages to do an act, it is deemed to be his own faulty and folly that he did not thereby provide against contingencies, and exempt himself from responsibilities in certain events and in such case, (that is, in the instance of an absolute general contract the performance is not excused by an inevitable accident, or other contingency, although not foreseen by, nor within the control of the party. (–A Law Dictionary, Adapted to the Constitution and Laws of the United States, By John Bouvier, 1856)

–=–

How then, may an act of man be an act of God instead of and immune from also being considered a legal action (done under man’s law in false persona)? The answer to this question is the definition of True Freedom, that is, Freedom under YHVH (Truth) and Its Law (i.e. LOGOS: the example of Christ). Unfortunately, what is not understood by most men is that the Law of God is neutral. In other words, it is considered as the negative law. This simply means that, while all of man’s legal law is called as “positive law,” or that which is added unnaturally to and in opposition of what already Exists self-Evidently (the Law of Nature), the Law of God (the Nature of Existence) stands in negativity, meaning that every man has the right to say no, to refuse the addition of anything not of YHVH, to refuse belief in and action upon what is not Truth, and therefore to remain pure and untainted in mind, body, and soul. The act of saying no is the highest act of law, for as the maxim goes, he that denies need show any proof. Only he that makes a positive (legal) claim must show proof, for whatever is claimed legally is always not self-evident or self-existent. What is legally claimed is never negative in its Nature. Man may only claim what is artificial, for man can in Reality, in Truth, own no part of YHVH, of which he himself is part of and the temple for. Freedom is not a positive claim. Freedom is the God-given (negative) right not to be governed (controlled) by corrupted men, by the artifice of man’s inventions. In other words, he that acts in and under YHVH (Absolute Truth) need never prove anything to any man or legal system, for the Highest Nature and Law is always behind his actions. Therefore his actions are self-evident. That which is positive is never that which is of YHVH. Only tat which is positive (artificial) requires proof. Math, as a manmade artifice, always requires proof, while what math represents in Reality never needs math to prove its self-Existence and self-Evidence.

To be clear, the only thing that proves math is math itself. Math is not self-evident. Math is not self-existent. Math is not part of the I AM.

And let us be clear, the only proof of the value of money is the willing faith that corrupted men put into it. Only when men stop trying to prove themselves through legal and other artificial means will men know God (Truth). But in general men have been tricked into believing in the false-truth of money, or in other words to love (believe in) money while considering “God” (Reality) to be false. Yet YHVH is defined as Truth, and money as a false god. How can this be?

–=–

Positive Law

Those laws that have been duly enacted by a properly instituted and popularly recognized branch of government. Postive laws may be promulgated, passed, adopted, or otherwise “posited” by an official or entity vested with authority by the government to prescribe the rules and regulations for a particular community. In the United States, postive laws come in a variety of forms at both the state and federal levels, including legislative enactments, judicial orders, executive decrees, and administrative regulations. In short, a positive law is any express written command of the government. The belief that the only legitimate sources of law are those written rules and regulations laid down by the government is known as Positivism. –West’s Encyclopedia of American Law, Edition 2.

Positive Law

Noun – Statutory man-made law, as compared to “natural law” which is purportedly based on universally accepted moral principles, “God’s Law,” and/or derived from Nature and reason. The term “positive law,” was first used by Thomas Hobbes in Leviathan (1651). (See:  natural law) –Copyright 1981-2005 by Gerald N. Hill and Kathleen T. Hill.

–=–

As stated above, an act of God exempts a man (or legal party) from liability in the legal realm under common law. In other words, as man is the temple of God (spirit), what comes forth as a result of the actions of any man, when done under the moral compass and Law of God (Nature), cannot be mistaken or contractually understood to be a legal act. An act of God is not punishable under man’s legal law. Thus, a True and Free (self-governing) man must at all times refrain from all that is not of Truth. This, of course, includes money (mammon). For the legal law is the manmade law concerning only evil acts, that is, the administration and regulation of acts against God (Nature/Truth), those not done under the Law of Nature, or more accurately, those that are not self-Evident. Citizenship is merely the organized, often pre-forgiven, administrated adulteries of men that cannot govern their own minds because their spirit has become legally dead. And there are no court cases that, at the heart of the matter before the court, do not equate “crime” with the artificial, pretended monetary valuation of that crime. Remedy is always in the form of mammon, for money is the only actual product created and administered by government. All money is property of government. Government is the host and beneficiary of the parasitic intent of mammon. In other words, legal courtrooms administrate only evils, never good deeds. For the maxim of law is clear that good and moral behavior cannot be forced upon persons.

The entire legal system is a franchise of mammon. Never forget that governments are the inventors and owners of all money, no matter whom those governments allow to print or pretend to create through debt/credit paper that root of all evil. Every court case has a monetary valuation attached to it, as does every person. But remember, nothing that is an act of God, including free men under God, can be made to magically “appear” in court, for True men take no persona (legal mask) and pretend to be nothing but that of a part of God’s self-existent, self-evident Nature and Law. Only legally invented persons appear, for they don’t exist in the Real world. The government may only control its own artificial (positive) creation, that is, persons. Thus it can only control men who act in a government persona (mask/status). This is the law of agency.

No game may be played unless those playing the game agree to the rules and thus pretend to temporarily become the artificial avatar those rules apply to. The shoe or car in Monopoly. The pawn in chess. Thomas Anderson in The Matrix. The legal system is merely a game, and you choose whether to play or not and what character to use. But when it is forgotten by the players that the game isn’t Real, isn’t of God’s Nature and Law, and therefore the avatar forgets he or she is a self-evident, self-existent man in Reality, then… well, welcome to the United States corporation: a soulless dystopia of greed and neglect. All hail mammon!

Remember, in law, a man is an act of God with inherent (God-given) rights. A man always has the (negative) right to say no, but only if he has not contracted a legal dis-ease.

A person (legal status) is a contractual engagement between a man and the state to perform a sanctioned duty, and God/Truth/Reality is generally no excuse for nonfulfillment of contract within that anti-God (legal) system. Thus a man of God that corrupts himself with contractual (legal) law is no longer considered to be of Truth (God) nor protected by It. From the legal point of view, and act of God is exempt from the legal (strict) law. What is of God (Truth) is never bound to the state. What is an act of God is never controllable by the state. For the state holds no power over what is self-existent and self-evident, the very definition of YHVH. Only through illusion and trickery does the fiction infect the minds of men so that the state may then effect Nature through them, acting on their behalf, leaving no actual choice, only causality. Choice only exists in the negative, not the positive.

Most importantly, we must understand that Truth contains no artifice any more than artifice can be Truth. What is not Truth is not part of God (YHVH), for God is only Truth. Truth and Truth alone will set men free. Persons are legally created, positive law vessels of enslavement, putting men under a performance contract, bond, and surety. Bouvier’s definition above shows that the constitution only protects from infringement the inherent (negative) rights of men, and that legal persons are not protected thereof, for persons have no inherent (God-given) rights. TO BE CLEAR, PERSONS DO NOT EXIST IN NATURE, ARE NOT SELF-EXSISTANT, AND ARE NOT SELF-EVIDENT. Persons require proof of identity. Nothing of or invented by man is God-given. Nothing of man is Truth. For all that is Truth is of YHVH. YHVH IS TRUTH.

This repetition of concept is not accidental on my part, and is quite relevant to the subject line. It is not religion, but Law. One must understand this difference to be free, for True Freedom only exists in YHVH (self-existence/self-evidence). Existing as a non-self-evident person in law is not True Freedom. All artificial, legal forms of so-called “freedoms” are man-made under contract, defined legally as franchises. Franchises (incorporations) are not of God, existing only in legally bound contracts (spiritual death). If these terms are unfamiliar to you, please download my book, here: strawmanstory.info

What is defined here as an “act of God” is not nor cannot be “proven” by mathematics or some other artificial means, but by the self-evident, self-existent Truth that God’s Nature and Design is ultimately not knowable to man, that is, the force that is an act of Nature, meaning an act of God’s Creation (Self-Existence), is ultimately unpredictable by artificial means. When attempted to be cast over Nature like a sophisticated connect-the-dots fishing net, mathematics simply causes the artificial feeling of predictability and therefore temporary, false-control against that which is not controllable by man. It causes an addictive, short-lasting god complex; one in which the typical math junky chases with maddening leaps and bounds while never reaching that perfect high of absolute predictability. Math loves chaos. Chaos is the false god of math. For chaos at first often appears predictable before at any moment spiraling off into what then appears to be randomness, all while admitting to the Truth – that some “unknown” Law (YHVH/LOGOS) is controlling it the whole time. Man may certainly predict the outcome of his own invention, but even the artificial law of man admits without doubt that Nature (God) is at all times a higher power than man… and therefore ultimately uncontrollable and unpredictable.

Thanks to the hubris and arrogance of mathematicians engaged in scientism, an inversion of Reality has taken place. In other words, God (Truth) has been relegated by the arts and so-called sciences as artificial, while mathematics has been elevated to God-like proportion and depth. Math has become to many the only path to enlightenment, a false light designed to express Truth proportionate to its own extreme limitations and faults. Math, it is said, is perfect. But can perfection exist in that which comes from such an imperfect source, that of man’s imagination? By definition, Truth is perfection. Can what is not of the self-existent, self-evident Truth (God) be perfect? Can what is artificial be at the same time what is the Truth?

Weather forecasting is merely a thinly laid pretext to weather control. Yet control is wholly dependent on predictability. And we all know how that’s going: it may or may not rain today… a 50% chance of snow… etc.

The question one might ask is this: does this term of the legal art, as an acknowledgement of an “Act of God,” in some way prove that God (Truth) exists?

And that would be a trick question, a practical joke we play on ourselves. It’s also the proverbial Achilles’ heel of scientistic mathematicians everywhere. Man’s definitions and titles, no matter what language, in letters or in numbers, are never anything more than just that – symbols of the Real. They are lies told to encapsulate the Truth within an organized system of falsity. For man in no way can Create Truth, only the fictions and symbols that represent It. Art is never what is Real. Art is man’s artificial reflection of what is Truth. When art is changed, damaged, or destroyed, the Real remains untouched and unaffected, for the Real is self-Existent. Likewise, when a person is declared dead, this does not mean the man that person reflects in legal status is also dead. The death of a man is a cessation of a vessel that carries Life (Truth). The legal (artificial) death of a fiction of law (person) is merely the end (execution) of a legal performance contract (art). This act, being not of God, requires legal proof in the form of a certified a death certificate that proves the birth of that contractual status (persona) to be ended. There is nothing of self-evidence; nothing of life therein.

Within the very intent and meaning of YHVH (God) is again the word Existence, as that which Exists despite man’s designs against Nature and Its Law. YHVH does not merely exist, YHVH IS EXISTENCE. Thus any question demanding an answer to the non-sequitur of the self-existence of God is mute, for YHVH is defined as all that is Self-Existence. What man invents cannot be defined as that which is self-Created, self-evident, or self-existent. A Creation of God Exists with or without man’s lowly forms of legal or mathematical proof, for man is as well a self-Existent part of YHVH. Man, in other words, cannot escape the Truth that all men are Creations of God (Nature), despite any attempt to prove otherwise.

The intent and meaning of the term YHVH was never meant to be debated or proven right or wrong. One cannot very well argue that there are two forms of TRUE (self) Existence, that which is in and of Nature (YHVH) found upon the Earth, and that which is of and in the so-called “world” of artifice, hosted by men and the designs we harbor against Nature (God) and Its Law. A Natural act of man is of course also an act of God, unless that man does so against God and Its Immortal and Never-ending Creation and Law, also called as an evil. What is built of man is always temporary, for YHVH is only understood as that which is Eternal, having no end and no beginning. This does not require belief, only the understanding that eternity is as well Self-Evident.

Any and all arguments, debates, and cultish sects that devote themselves to the non-existence of YHVH, that is, to the non-existence of the Whole of Existence (God) itself, can be understood here only to be an unprovable contradiction; a contrarian, nihilistic nonsense restricted to the realm of fools and their insidiously meaningless errands.

Enter the cult of the artifice and artful sciences of mathematics…

I recently viewed this short documentarian presentation that I highly recommend to all, representing a sort of final end all be all answer to the notion of mathematical proofs. Within we find that the three basic necessities or axioms that are apparently required in mathematics to be considered as True and accurate, those of completeness, consistency, and decidability, are indeed unable to be proven or evidenced. In fact, quite the opposite is True. The oxymoronic question then is this: can mathematics prove YHVH (Truth), which is Self-Existent and self-Evident, and therefore without need of such proofs of men?

Please take the time to watch this presentation, for it may be the most important thing you watch in this lifetime:

–=–

How does one perfect a system that is by its very nature imperfect?

Now consider the frightening Truth about what is the absolute best that any artificial intelligence can possibly be. At best, any A.I. will necessarily be incomplete, inconsistent, and therefore unpredictable.

–=–

A.I. Would you like to play a game?

Typical scientistic mathematicianYes, please!

A.I. – How about “Global-Thermal Nuclear War”

Typical scientistic mathematicianHell yes! After all, what could go wrong…?

–=–

The moral of the story is simple: math cannot uncover the secrets of the Universe (YHVH). Math will never tell the Truth. Therefore, any system based on mathematical language (art) will only produce artifice. More to the point, the only True equation we may take from this is the following:

MATH IS NOT EQUAL TO TRUTH.

GOD (TRUTH) DOES NOT USE MATH.

AND GEOMETRY IS CERTAINLY NOT SACRED.

–=–

Now before you get upset that I’m calling out your cult-like love of golden geometrical ratios, please understand that the point here is not that these artificial shapes and equations aren’t or can’t be useful. Please note here that it’s not at all ironic that we are taught to equate such a neato geometric shape with the ultimate standard of false valuation in mammon, that is gold, by the way. And it’s quite humorous to ponder that the market price of gold changes daily, therefore so too must the artificial value of the “golden ratio.” The point is that when men place the religious connotation of sacredness upon its own inventions and symbols, the Real is often lost to the symbol, the symbol taking upon itself an existence of its own; one not necessarily still attached to Reality. The worship of symbology, or in other words the holding as sacred of any language art (including mathematics), has today led to the worship of the symbol as a simulacrum. While once the symbol was a metaphorical replacement for something Real, being a simulation, it’s when the symbol becomes its own false truth that the simulation turns into its most corrupt representation of itself, the simulacrum. In the case of so-called sacred geometry, this logical fallacy plays out as follows:

Simulation – the symbol represents the real.

Simulacrum – the symbol is detached from the real and worshiped as its own image.

Thus we turn from the understanding that geometry is an artificial and always imperfect tool of the measurement of the self-existent, self-evident Truth of Nature, and begin to believe instead that the universe is a tool created with geometry, or that geometry is in fact a Law of Nature.

In all cases where man worships the symbol of his own making, the artifice instead of the Real (Truth), then the word sacred takes upon itself the inverse meaning of cursed. That is to say that when the artifice (lies) are worshiped as sacred truths, then all that may come from such belief (love) is cursed to be inharmonious with Life, with Nature and Its Law.

So what is the state of those that hold geometry as sacred?

In a word, idolatry.

To put it another way, God doesn’t do math.

–=–

SACRED – adjective – [Latin sacersacred holy, cursed, damnable. We here see the connection between sacredness and secrecy. The sense is removed or separated from that which is common, vulgar, polluted, or open, public; and accursed is separated from society or the privileges of citizens, rejected, banished.] 1. Holy; pertaining to God or to his worship; separated from common secular uses and consecrated to God and his service; as a sacred place; a sacred day; a sacred feast; sacred service; sacred orders. 2. Proceeding from God and containing religious precepts; as the sacred books of the Old and New Testament. 3. Narrating or writing facts respecting God and holy things; as a sacred historian. 4. Relating to religion or the worship of God; used for religious purposes, as sacred songs; sacred music; sacred history. 5. Consecrated; dedicated; devoted; with to. A temple sacred to the queen of love. 6. Entitled to reverence; venerable. Poet and saint to thee alone were given, the two most sacred names of earth and heav’n. 7. Inviolable, as if appropriated to a superior being; as sacred honor or promise. Secrets of marriage still are sacred held. Sacred majesty. In this title, sacred has no definite meaning, or it is blasphemy. Sacred place, in the civil law, is that where a deceased person is buried.

SACRED – (‘seikrid) – Adj. 1. Exclusively devoted to a deity or to some religions ceremony or use; holy; consecrated. 2. Worthy of or regarded with reverence, awe, or respect. 3. Protected by superstition or piety from irreligious actions. 4. Connected with or intended for religious use: sacred music. 5. Dedicated to; in honor of… –Collins English Dictionary – Complete and Unabridged, 12 Edition 2014

–=–

Money and geometry are religions, or rather what are instead anti-religions.

Money is not evil. The love (belief) in money as Reality is evil. Therefore, money can only be used for evil.

Geometry is not evil. The love (belief) in geometry as Reality is evil. Therefore geometry can only be used for evil.

That sounds a bit crazy, I know. Here is where the art of neutrality comes into play, which disregards beliefs and prejudices. Let us consider then what is evil? Evil is very simply that which is opposed to Nature (YHVH) and Its Law. All inventions of men are necessarily opposed to (opposite from, not the same as) Nature, meaning they are not self-evident or self-existent. Anti-gravity is certainly an evil, though it may be used for good. Geometry may also be used for good, but its nature will always be that of a manmade construct, and therefore always must be examined and considered as such. Duel use. To put it another way, the FORM of money and the FORM of geometry have no SUBSTANCE. What is of man is always merely the FORM of some SUBSTANCE that already pre-existed self-evidently. That is, what man invents and thus “creates” can only be the FORM of God’s already self-Existent CREATION (SUBSTANCE). Man does not and cannot Create as YHVH does. Here again we find this to be a self-evident Truth. If you don’t believe it, then please point to anything of SUBSTANCE ever invented by man that was not first removed from the self-existing Earth? I’ll wait…

Simply stated, the perfection of self-Existence cannot be replaced by the imperfection of invention.

Like any challenge to every cult or religion, this knowledge based on empirical evidence may come as a shock to you. Indeed, man’s design of mathematics relies wholly on its supposed ability to be used as a PROOF. But let us consider the Truth about this conceptual, manmade tool we call as math.

Firstly, I’m sure some of you have already relegated me into the same pit of despair that every religion does when someone challenges the validity of its manmade belief system. And like any religion, you may excommunicate me and put a scarlet letter upon my imaginary lapel simply because I questioned your authority as the spokesman for that mystical, unknown mathematical designer of the Universe.

Obviously, like religion, mathematics is a circular logic. It is limited to its own set, much like any alphabet. And it is designed to be this way, let’s not forget. It serves a purpose and can be very useful. But it can only be verified or proven by its own formally, proprietarily inbred formulae. And most importantly, nothing in Nature happens as a result of mathematics, though certain events can certainly be measured mathematically. Again, if this is a difficult concept for you, then please prove in Nature, in Reality, the self-Existence of the number 1. It’s impossible. Your only proof must come from a mathematical formula, for the number 1 only exists inside mathematics. There is no actual “1” in Nature. This is because there is no SUBSTANCE in math, only FORM.

Remember, what is of Nature and Its Law is negative (inherent). Inversely, what is of man and its artifice is positive (an unnatural addition).

Math, being a construct of man, can and should only ever be considered to be positive. What is added to Nature by man is not a Creation of Nature. A symbol is never Source.

You may be surprised to learn that 90% of what the Bible teaches is simply this: to never confuse, worship, or give undue authority to what is artificial (manmade) as if it’s the same as that which is of self-Existence (YHVH). Keep all Creation pure, including most of all the sacred vessel of God — the mind, body, and soul (spirit) of man. The Bible is a book of Natural Law, to be followed religiously (held sacred at all costs). Therefore, it is 100% opposed to man’s matrix of artificial, positive, legal law. Why? Simple. What is of man in any form is never the substance of God (self-Existence). Take the obfuscations and mis-transliterations of false “Christian” religions out of the equation, and suddenly the Bible is as beautiful and self-evident as Nature and Its Law. But it must be read only with the intent of finding and worshiping what it seeks to protect and hold sacred, the self-evident Truth. Like all manmade things, the Bible itself, while holding sacred knowledge, has been turned into a prop, furniture, considered only by its form without the substance it represents. The Bible, as the crucifix and cross, have become simulacra — mere symbols that bear no meaning, intent, or connection to their sacred purposes. This is what religion does to Truly sacred things.

Math is nothing more and nothing less than a very complicated yet logical written language. Unravel the form and mystery of The Matrix simulation to its foundational base level and all you have are mathematical symbols, each containing some artificial valuation, forced together in a controlled algorithm to pretend a false reality. Is that not also the description of 1+1=2? Does not such an equation, a pre-tended artificial valuation, need the agreement of both parties to be considered as fact? If I took these manmade symbols to any primitive tribe in the world, would they have any clue what they meant? More importantly, do they need to know the meaning of these fictional terms 1, +, =, and 2 to know the self-evident Truth about the collection of berries they collected from Nature? Do they need a word or symbol for these concepts, to live and to eat? Do they need to be able to draw out artificial plans or representations in numerical form in order to build a clay hut? Do they need to be reeducated to believe that numbers are “perfect” when their whole self-Existence has been in the perfection of God (Truth)? Do numbers cause Truth, or is Truth self-Existent? Do numbers prove Truth, or is Truth self-Evident?

Obviously math is not perfect, for math is a creation of man, made by men ignoring the Law of God (Truth). Yet turn on any math-based science entertainment show on television and, through special effects and visual technology (art), we see pictures and impossible images of the mathematical structure of the universe – a massive space that no man has been or ever will go. These shows have titles like “Understanding The Universe”, which is another way of saying that God (YHVH), which of course includes the self-evident and self-existent Universe as Its meaning, can be understood through mathematical equations turned into moving pictures of art (form without substance) invented by men from the extremely limited perspective of Earth. They actually believe they know what It is. And they attempt to remove the beautiful mystery of the unknown by replacing it with mathematical simulation, causing the delusion of false-knowledge for that which is not meant to be know by men. This religion of mathematical scientism, as what appears to be a purposeful side-effect cast like a spell upon the common group-think hive-mind, indeed causes that wonderous and unknowable mystery of YHVH (or as they call it, the Universe) to be relegated to just another conquest of man, like discovering America. Reality is all but ignored, the mysterious beauty disparaged by delusional, artful, colored-in renderings, causing the spiritual wonder and helplessness of man under the awesome and unfathomable power of God (YHVH) to be equally diminished. We don’t look up anymore to see the stars because the trillions of sources of artificial light from our contemporary designs against Nature have left the dark skies awash in a blanket of artificial illumination.

But let us take the example given in this documentary presentation above as our primary wake-up moment. It must be said first and foremost that, only when one limits oneself to the manmade construct of mathematics can one win or lose the debate. But then, one cannot claim to live in Truth and also ignore all Truth but what mathematics pretend. So already we find a paradox. However, for the sake of the point of the story, let’s speak directly to the foundation of all problems that man creates when acting against the Truth and Law that is and emanates from YHVH (God).

The scenario used is that all bearded men must be shaved by the designated “barber” of that town, no exceptions, and that of course includes the man that is the barber. And so, as the story goes, therefore the barber is unable to shave himself, for that STRICT LAW would then be broken, as the man would then be shaving himself instead of having the designated “barber”, which was the title of the man in need of shaving, do it for him.

And so the mathematicians go to work and find this to be a paradox. There is no way for the “barber” to be shaved.

Now, disregarding the sheer stupidity of this allegory, in order to show that this so-called paradox is in fact a false dialectic created by the same rules that created the problem in the first place, we must actually remove mathematics from the equation and remember the foundation of the Law of Nature (God). To solve any problem in Reality, the sum of some mathematical equation cannot ever be the final answer. In that, we find the societal and faith-based logical fallacies that are at the root of the actual problem. This is not a math problem, it’s a spiritual problem. And needless to say, there is no mathematical solution to a spiritual problem. Remember that it’s equally a self-evident Truth that there is no spiritual solution to a mathematical problem. They are not of the same realm.

Yet here we find the perfect example of how spiritual thought and action eliminates any mathematical problem that might be conceived or designed by man. To understand this, we must first understand that mathematics are designed to offer a non-spiritual view of anything. Math is not representative of God, only of man’s exploitation thereof. There are no morals in math equation. Why? Because there is no Truth in math equation. There is only the model, the cold form without substance, without Life.

And so, I can simply refer to the Bible, which states that men should never respect manmade, legally issued, or popular flattering titles, and suddenly this whole story becomes mute. In other words, just as the Truth is that there is no spoon in The Matrix simulation, there is no “Barber” in Reality. And it’s not that there is no spoon, there is nothing. It’s all artificial. Fake. Not Real. A simulation.

And so in order for this mathematical formulation to work, we must note that the Law of Truth must be ignored. That is, the fact that no man is actually, in Truth, a “barber”, must be ignored. The “barber” (flattering title/Noun) is a prop in the math script, and without that artificial construct of fiction, without that flattering title, no such mathematical problem would exist.

Math, like logic, only applies to manmade things. It should be apparent that what is self-evident (Truth) does not need external or manmade evidence to Exist. It does not need such proofs or evidence as can be provided by these constructs of men. Inversely, reason should not be confused with logic, nor should mathematics ever be used as the reason behind anything that isn’t manmade.

What we find is that there is no actual problem here in Reality, in Truth, and that only the artificial names, symbols, and titles that man assigns to himself cause any problems. If no man respected the artificial title of Barber, then no rule would be able to be formed. And he that has the skills linked to the flattering title of barber certainly need not use the title to use the skills. The skill, in other words, the action, does not need any title. No title can stop a man from acting, unless he believes in the power and authority and false law behind the title, and therefore that some authority higher than that title is the lawmaker, a false God. No title, no math problem.

The point of this is to show that no problem in Reality comes from a mathematical source, and so no mathematical solution can solve any problem in Reality. There is no spoon, just as there is no Barber. Yet faith in the title causes the need for manmade (non-spiritual) solutions to purely logic-based (manmade) problems, which ironically would not exist (as self-evident) in the first place without man’s foolish addiction to artifice. Manmade problems are never self-Existent. Manmade problems are a direct result of ignoring the Law and Laws of Nature (God).

To cut to the chase, the moral of this story is simply that negative spiritual problems cannot be fixed by positive artificial solutions, any more than secular problems are caused by True, Spiritual men of God. Lies cannot fix the Truth, for the Truth is already perfection and needs no fixing. Yet in all cases, the Truth can fix or eliminate the lies.

So how long will we keep lying to ourselves?

One thing is for sure, mathematics will not fix the damage men do to God’s Nature, and money will never buy love or spiritual pureness and happiness.

Be well…

.

–Clint > Richard-son (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Thursday, July 15th, 2021 of this artificial timeline…

“Gleaming The Matrix” (New Strawman Book Preview)


What will it be?
Be sure to watch the ending. It’s like a trailer for the book!

–=–

Greetings programs…

Just a short post to celebrate my friend Craig’s latest update on the cover for my next book, a private work (yes, if I am able, it will be free to download as all my works are, and available in paperback free with general donation toward my work [as an unconditional gift]).

Note: However, I am still seeking a publishing agent, for this and many other books both new and rewritten from my blog over the years. Any help in that department would be appreciated. In this case, I would be selling the book in the interest of getting it out there way more than I can alone, on the usual sites. That said, the pusillanimous gatekeepers of the publishing industry seem to have sold their souls to any such honest and integral works. The Truth is apparently poison to them. A general book proposal is available for this title upon request. Perhaps one of them will prove me wrong after all…

As stated, this work will be my best attempt to demystify The Matrix from a mere shallow attempt at Sci-fi entertainment designed to obfuscate and invert the Truth of its badly plagiarized source, Simulacrum and Simulation (by the late Jean Baudrillard), and reveal just how that author intended our collective “simulation” to be understood. It’s not often an author whose book is being used as a cornerstone (and an important prop) in a blockbuster film removes himself from that corrupted enterprise, especially when the reasons are spiritual, literary, and just.

If you’ve wondered just what the actual “matrix” is, look no further than the legal system you are caught in like a fly in a spider’s web. But the source is not what you think! For you are the temple. You are the source. You are the spoon.

The simulation has you…

Time to actually wake up!

One last note: I am nowhere close to being finished with this work, as my time is focused on documenting the criminal syndicate that is the NIH and religion of modern false science surrounding “SARS-2,” as well as its cover up and politicization. Please enjoy and support Craig’s works of art, for he has freely helped me and created these artistic masterpieces without reward and with love and kindness. This type of work is his contribution to consciousness, having woken up to the darkness surrounding the “professional” art world and of course suffered for that knowledge and clear vision.

Many have asked over the years how they can support me… Craig did it without consideration of even his own financial situation, not for me but for the sake of any it may reach out there. In a spiritual war, one that most don’t even see happening against them, we must give of ourselves not for reward but for the love of that which is threatened. I want to thank him for his dedication and valuable time given freely, but especially for encouraging me to keep writing with this ingenious cover-art. Hopefully the book will do Craig’s vision and art some justice!

More vids by Craig, including his work on my books and films: artofcraigs (bitchute.com)

Want to support me? Please support Craig on my behalf right now with anything you can spare, here: https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=RP6RDSPZVSA9N&source=url

I would consider it a very personal favor.

Thanks!

.

–Clint > richard-son (Realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Friday, July 2st, 2021

Lethal Injection 2: A Corruption Of Blood


Well folks, after a tedious 3-day delay of over 70 hours, my new documentary has been “censored” by Youtube for “copyright” claim, despite the protection of law that declares fair use protection for non-profit and educational and critical (critique) works. No money earned, no legitimate copyright claim. Copyright, of course, only protects greed and gain. Yet again we see that money corrupts all things… Not ironically, all videos presented in Lethal Injection 2 are downloaded from Youtube in the first place.

And so here’s the new plan…

Firstly, watch my short 4 minute farewell video to the corrupt Youtube/Google garbage heap of monopolistic incorporation, which strangely enough it did not ban, here:

–=–

Now, the good stuff:

Lethal Injection 2: A Corruption of Blood (Part 1) can now be seen on the following platforms. However, the film is still being uploaded and processed at Bitchute.

Bitchute (Red Pill Sunday School) channel:
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/sUSR…

Brighteon (Red Pill Sunday School) channel (MOVIE IS ALREADY POSTED AND READY TO HERE): https://www.brighteon.com/channels/redpillsundayschool

And finally, here’s your downloadable copies to keep and protect from all the slime that wants it burned:

The 1080 version (recommended):

https://www.mediafire.com/file/su2jgtfbg04gdlh/Lethal_Injection_2_-A_Corruption_of_Blood%2528Part_1%2529_1080p.mp4/file

And the 720 version:

https://www.mediafire.com/file/30o6pfykatop1b7/Lethal_Injection_2_-A_Corruption_of_Blood%2528Part_1%2529_720p.mp4/file

Please feel free to view and download these files freely as with all my works, or if you’d like to wait, a lower quality (smaller) file will be available within the next couple of days and posted above.

Please also share them freely as you see fit in both formats, remembering that the only thing that makes it lawful to do so is its perceived legal status, or in other words, please do not attempt to sell, rent, monitize, or profit from this movie in any way. Always keep it free and available to all people.

Future parts to come in 2021, if we live that long…

Have a spiritual, wonderful Christmas and enjoy.

All my love…

.

–Clint > richard-son (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Wednesday, December 23rd, 2020

Publicists Wanted


Greetings to all…

As the title suggests, I am seeking one or more (an organized group of) publicists for help in getting both my work out to more platforms and to garner interviews and/or other “events” that would offer the opportunity for public speaking or debate.

As many of you know, I am just days away from releasing the first of several documentary films exposing the entire technocratic medical, pharmaceutical, university, and so-called “scientific communities” that make up the severely controlled industries built up around us to govern all things. Combined, these forces are the most sophisticated (unnecessarily complicated), prestigious (illusionary/tricky), and detrimental (life-threatening) force against our collective health and well-being ever constructed.

But what I have uncovered now goes beyond these grievances that, ineffectively, are generaly relegated to mere talking points between commercial radio shows. What you will see is an already well-established, well-inundated blueprint of a war against Nature, one more deadly and present than you can possibly imagine. Revolution is not a word that can describe what is needed right now. For what these so-called doctors and scientists are experimenting on and re-creating in labs are designed to kill every man, animal, plant, and microbe on Earth.

But I digress, for this will be shown in triplicate and completely sourced in my first documentary of the series, coming to you within the next week. Covid-19 is 100% a provable biological weapon, and as you will discover, in reality cannot be anything else. In other words, it’s characteristics (functions) cannot be biologically Created in Nature, only in a laboratory setting. You will no longer need to guess or wonder what it is nor who and what government agency is responsible and, God-willing, liable.

The problem is, they have also done similar biological weapons research on just about every other virus and pathogen known and even unknown to the public. Ebola, Zika, H5N1, HIV, and of course SARS and MERS are just the tip of the iceberg. They have re-created all of them through man-made mutation, known as gain of function (forced evolution/mutation) research. And the most astonishing part about this is that, behind closed doors, they speak openly and forthrightly about what they have done. In other words, these so-called “scientists” have done this research openly under the government funding and approval of none other than Anthony Fouchi and the National Institutes of Health. Yes, Fauchi is the head of this snake, and is actually in charge of lab-mutation experiments of extremely deadly viruses like already Highly Pathogenic H5N1, which by itself kills up to 60% of those it infects. But in the lab, these gain of function experiments mutate that already deadly virus to cause it to be, not only more deadly, but Fauchi has allowed it to be genetically re-designed so that it is now transmissible by human to human contact and airborne in mammals, functions that have never happened in Nature.

We are one accident away from this virus being accidentally or purposefully released into the Natural environment by what amounts to a bunch of sociopathic eugenicists, otherwise known as geneticists and so-called scientists. I cannot stress how important this information is, but I can say that nothing else in this world matters in comparison. And I tell you with all sincerity and diligence that we are on the verge of global extinction because of these many, man-made mutations of already deadly viruses, including SARS-2. If ever there was a time to revolt, to fight for our very lives and that of the Natural Order, I tell you now is that time. Tomorrow literally may be too late. Government already knows, so I won’t tell you to contact your congressman, except that then you can show them to be complicit, complacent, and already in the know when they do nothing about this. Legal bureaucracy will not fix this spiritual problem.

And so, again, I am seeking people who truly wish to help spread this information by helping me get this and future documentary films out there to any and every one possible, as well as promoting me as a guest so that I may promote the film series and warn people as well.

Honestly, years of censorship and disrespect has made me want to just sit back with a Corona and lime and watch the whole thing play out from my lawn chair, because that’s what happens to men whose warnings are unheeded and whose message is ignored for almost two decades. This is my last ditch effort. I will not continue if I cannot get the help I need, and in all honesty, believe that we all deserve what is coming and soon if we do not finally organize and fight these – what I can only call EVIL men in completely, irreversably corrupt institutions.

Lastly, I have decided that, after this series of what I am calling master class documentaries are finished, I will be ending this blog in order to turn many of the articles I’ve written on this blog into printed books, most likely by a print-on-demand service, because there is no way to compete against that industry. My blog posts and books will be edited, updated, and some even have the need to be finished, and combined into subject-oriented books. For instance, I’ve always wanted to write a book on the history and effect of the CAFR, government finance and wealth, and how pension funds like CalPERS have been the cornerstone of funding globalism.

So again, I’m seeking partners for the long haul here. Many of you have asked me how you can help, and this is my answer. Maybe someday I will even be able to pay you for your past services! I am looking for one or many people that are just waiting for an actual movement to form from this lame duck claptrap we call the alternative media. Life or death seems like a fairly motivating goal, though I’ve certainly been wrong and disappointed before.

So how about it? Are you up to the challenge? You are needed.

If this post isn’t enough to motivate you, then my upcoming film should certainly do the trick… unless, that is, you are already so far gone, so lacking in love and empathy, so narcissistic and/or sociopathic by this point that you simply don’t give a damn anymore.

Contact me at clint@strawmanstory.info for more information and to plan a strategy, as well as create a forum where those that wish may be organized and help support each other.

Honestly, I could use a good I.T. specialist as well. My website numbers are lower than ever, and I’m certain this is partially my fault for not knowing how to get the site in the top searches. I’ve not been able to find my blog at all from certain hotels and other chains.

Please note that I have no income, so I cannot pay anyone at this point. That might change in the future.

My immediate concern is reaching all outlets possible in the alternative and mainstream realm with a link to the film, that is, all doctors, activists, radio and TV hosts, and anyone at all affiliated with the vaccine movement, for or against, as well as all activists and doctors/scientists that have spoken out against this “gain of function” or “duel-use” (biological weapons) type research, and of course the usual email lists, Facebook type forums, and other websites and outlets.

I love and cherish you all, but it’s time to get off of your collective asses and fight like your life depends on it… because this time it actually does! The battle to preserve Nature and Its Law is being defeated without even a whimper of protest, and that means man will also fall when it does. For all of this research and mutation comes back to one and only one thing… TRANSHUMANISM – the destruction and rebuilding of Nature’s Design by men that believe they are scientifically appointed gods in the religion of scientism.

I wish I was being an alarmist, over-protective, or simply a mad conspiracy dude. But when you see this film, the theory is removed by their own admissions as they spell out the conspiracy for you. No logical fallacies and name-calling can help them defeat the messenger this time, because this COVID documentary is like watching criminals monologue their whole design and past and future actions as if no public access will ever be gained.

We simply cannot fight anything, let alone a virus, unless we know its source. This documentary is a showcase about those that created SARS as a lab-grown biological weapon in the first place mutating it into SARS-2. Most shockingly, though, is that Anthony Fauchi is the guy in charge of it all, from funding to actual mutation, something I’m sure he has not mentioned in any of his television appearances preceding the SARS-2 Covid-19 outbreak.

Makes you wonder what Trump knows…

Please help! If you don’t wish to be involved, consider making a gift/donation so that I might finish these films. I’ve still got a long way to go.

I may start a crowd-funding campaign as well, offering the final film on one thumb-drive with extras to pass out in activism. Will definitely need help with that.

I’d wish you well, but I know better now. I can only really wish you days, weeks, months, and maybe a few years of this so-called life.

.

–Clint > richard-son (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Monday, September 28th, 2020

Red Pill Sunday School S2 E4 – Strawman Book Pt.3


Welcome to the third installment of my third book, entitled Strawman Logic: A Choice Between Two Evils. As I continue reading and commenting on my latest, always free work, we finally get to the meat of the subject, that is, how our soul (spirit) is separated from us, so that our mind and body may be controlled (driven) without spiritual considerations, which is called incorporation (emancipation). To incorporate is to disallow spiritual action, to temporarily kill the souls of men, replacing the moral (unwritten) law with man’s (strict written) or Roman (contract) law. Without choice, without free will, there is only administrative law, otherwise known as bureaucracy. Once free will is replaced with merely empty choices leading to the same evil, the STRAWMAN is complete. This is the path we have all been tricked into following instead of (in the place of) the example of Christ (Logos). And now the purpose and intent of The Corporation Nation can be understood and, if the will is still there, overcome.

The choice is and always has been in your hand and yours alone.

.

–Clint richard-son (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Friday, July 10th, 2020

An Open Letter To Jan Irvin and his “Gnostic” Media


Dear Jan,

Looking back, it seems I have spent my entire activist life seeking to find or make some goodness out of otherwise bad things. You, sadly, have proven to be no exception. How can I explain my tortured disposition right now? How do I shed the poison, the parasitic black hole that is Jan Irvin from my life and my reputation while helping others to avoid that not-so-hidden beast? Why did I allow you to be the straw that broke the camels back, so to speak — the causal effect to stopping my own show and lamely wither away like a poisoned weed? Why am I acting like such a little bitch, as if I’m some beaten down Hollywood starlet protecting her producer or directors’ immoral behaviors to get the part I wanted? And why am I allowing you to continue to poison and parasite off of not only my name and research but those others I seek to help and guide?

Well screw that!

#Metoo
#Timesup

To be frank, I have so many more important things to do than to try and counter your completely ridiculous false information and fallacious accusations about not merely myself but my family name. I’m sure hundreds of others out here feel the same; former research partners, friends, supporters, guests, and listeners all caught up like unwitting insects in the grill of that Gnostic steamroller that is your paranoid life. You are as the consummate spider, wrapping us into various cocoons within your spun web of lies and deceit, slowly sucking out the mojo, the will to carry on, and the soul of each victim to sustain your delusional existence and income, only to cut us loose once we’ve been drained of our usefulness like a pincushion pocked full of voodoo needles.

Yet, though I’d much rather be working on more beneficial things, you’ve placed the splinter of unwarranted doubt and distrust wheresoever your wormed-tongue has touched, and where your corrupt fingers have typed. And all this, suddenly, without warning, for reasons still unknown to me, even after my last Skype to you before the new year was to express my undying friendship and support despite the apparent army of handlers and trolls you claim that are after you. How foolish I feel now, believing your nonsensically conspiratorial concerns, even feeling sorry for your plight, and thus allowing a sociopath into my life the only way they know how to infiltrate — by pretending, by feigning friendship and emotion, and by triggering others to offer their own friendship and loyalty like the hopeful prey blindly turning its back in trust to its conniving predator. And so I feel the same presence of mind to overturn your ongoing historical hatchet-job and rhetorical scams as the story of the Christos did to the moneychangers, even as you continue to poison the temple and the Law, completely misusing and misdirecting in your rhetoric the scriptural intent and meaning I now teach straight from the Source.

The fact is that you abuse just about everyone within your digital, virtual reach, this being your number one complaint from both donating fans and whatever name you are currently labeling everyone else, be it trolls, agents, or whatever fits your conspiracy narrative. The word dick is actually the proper and most widely used colorful metaphor to describe your behavior and tone, used by your victims and fans alike. But what you’ve done to me, a friend and supporting colleague for almost a decade now, is not merely preposterous and downright evil, but 100% fallacious in every way. Yet, looking back, should I not have seen it coming? Any psychologist watching would have warned me of impending doom. After all, what parasite doesn’t eventually either harm or kill its host before discarding it without care for its well-being? Parasitically speaking, Jan, one must appreciate the extra care you’ve taken to ensure my personal spark to be extinguished behind you. Above and beyond, Jan, really. Like the wasp that stings its prey to deliver parasites because the wasp itself is already parasitically driven to do so, you’ve been using my reputation, and even my family name as fodder for your fallacious accusations so as to nourish and fester them, devouring me as sustenance while I sit paralyzed like a zombie watching it happen. But that’s what victims of parasitic infection do. They relax and watch helplessly as that which infests them chemically lobotomize any will to fight back, until the ability is no longer a part of their being even as their very life force is being sucked dry. They even protect the parasite that feeds off of them, if that is what the sociological programming of the parasite instructs.

You haven’t just become adept at uncovering the logical fallacies of others, but instead have learned to use them all as weapons. You do so not to help the user see his or her mistake in logic, but to disparage, to demonize, and often to banish, then go in for the kill by applying your own payload of twisted logic and disturbing insult while emotionally pummeling those who point out your own fallacious rhetoric, no matter their intentions or relationship to you. With me, you simply did as you often do, as bouts of paranoia continuously spark your twisted noodle into behavioral psychopathy, using unprovable, positive accusations and descriptions to demean my character, to poison my well. Never mind the argument, forget the facts… attack the messenger so as to ignore the primary source. Apparently you feel that if you talk about the use of logical fallacies by others long enough, pointing them out incessantly to the point that no full conversation or debate can ever actually take place and thus leaving an empty feeling in both the audience and the guest, that the falsehoods your own argument is based on will just be forgotten in the shuffle, the fallacious logic going unchecked?

Well I got news for you, sunshine, you’ve left a recorded audio, comment, and email trail of your particular brand of mayhem and madness behind, exposing the very nature of the narcissistic, parasitic sociopath you are, and now the taxman is cometh to collect. But first, we must provide an invoice; a history of your transactions within the borders of your own false dialectic and insanity…

As you well know, as a basic rule in science, it is said that one cannot prove a negative. Therefore, I cannot prove I am not something that you accuse me of, any more than you can prove that I am (because I’m not). How do I prove that I am not what Jan Irvin fallaciously says I am? The fact is, I can’t. And that’s why you did it, because you know most everyone out there will never check the veracity of your claims, let alone yourself ever offering any backing evidence. The murderer often gains the unwarranted trust of victims before sleighing them. Metaphorically, this is what you’ve done to your audience, including myself. And it’s no fun being on your particular chopping block, man, which is perhaps the reason I’ve been so silent for all these years. But even worse, how do I possibly pull such spewed venom from those you’ve bitten with your sinister charm and pathologically lying, accusatory disposition? For again, no one can prove something is not true, only that it is true. Amazingly this is the very foundation of law, for all of Nature is negative, self-existence, the I AM, which is why governments create positive (legal) identities and law, to identify all things negative (Real, of Nature), including men, as positive properties (by assigning artificial, legal names, titles, numbers, barcodes, etc.). To control the name or title, fallacious and inaccurate as it may be, is to control that which the name or title is attached, be it accurate or a lie. You’ve taken this legalism strategy, which not ironically stems from the and ancient “logicians,” to a whole new level though. For not only do you create the fallacious title like a deranged child, you then label and attempt to control the lies you place on anyone and everyone around you. In other words, you’ve created a blanket straw man argument called “troll” or “dirty” or “agent” or “CIA” or any other nondescript, unprovable, positively charged name/title, throwing it out like a darkly radiant, 360 degree fishing net. Your listeners, of course, don’t want to fall under that net, and so they walk on glass around you, knowing that any comment they might make, factual as it may be, could earn them a negatively applied title for their own efforts. Like unwitting dolphins, many good guys get caught in your careless net just like the very few actual bad guys, if there even are any. Sadly for you, you’ve hunted the sea almost dry and have hooked too many good people on your line of craziness before callously tossing us back into the sea, hurt, confused, and victimized, but at least more experienced, more hardened for our mistakes, so that we may recognize the signs of such unseen lures by unpredictable, abusive fishers of men as yourself. Meanwhile, I am guessing there are dozens if not hundreds of us out here unable to prove the negative to your positive. I’m dirty because Jan says it’s so. I’m CIA because Jan doesn’t like me or my information anymore. I’m must be an agent because Jan Irvin doesn’t like the fact that my primary sources contradict his secondary or Theosophic ones. I certainly must be a troll because I asked an uncomfortable question that might lead to rational thought and discussion, or for God’s sake, might un-spin your entire Gnostic web, your limited hangout “brain” program, to be a fraud.

So what am I to do, now that you have falsely but with so much confident arrogance outed me as an agent for the CIA that is out to get you, as someone that is dirty and likely working with many others that are also out to get you? How do I prove you wrong? How do I disprove your positive?

Simply put, I cannot. Because I (nor anyone, for that matter) can prove the negative. The problem is, neither can anyone else that hears your bullshit, completely unsourced and un-vetted fallacious attacks. Now my own friends, followers, and readers don’t know if they can trust me, all because Jan says I’m (probably) a dirty agent of the CIA. Your probability drive is broken, Jan.

So how do I escape the web of your sociopathic brain…

That’s it! It’s so simple!

Put me in your brain program! Show us all the CIA connections. I volunteer!!!

Unfortunately for you, Jan, my only reasonable recourse here is this: I must cause you to publicly make a complete fool out of yourself, not that you already haven’t. I must, in other words, make it official. I must force you to prove your positive accusation, which you can’t, so that my negative innocence remains unblemished by your fallacious, positive name-calling and accusatory rhetoric. In short, I must make you repent, retract, and apologize to myself and those you’ve poisoned by your fallacious, unchecked, un-veted rhetoric and name-calling in unwarranted, un-vetted judgement. So I demand you provide proof that my father and I are CIA. I would think your fans would demand it as well, along with proving all of the other 100’s of fallacious accusation you’ve made towards others, or perhaps they assume you just have a magic mirror and take your word for it?

Prove your claim and apologize when you can’t. Simple.

But the sociopath apologizes for nothing. It’s never the sociopaths fault, is it Jan?

You cannot simply point to your past research, which shows public information connections of historical figures to the CIA, and expect people to take that as some proof that your hysterical beliefs and rhetorical lies about all others are also therefore true. You must prove your claim, right? Isn’t that correct procedure under the Trivium model and the scientific method model? It certainly is a maxim of law. Another maxim is that I can’t prove a negative. Yet another is he that is accused does not bear the burden of proof. Innocence until proven guilty? Recognize any of these?

So whatcha gonna do, Jan?

Even the sociopathic personality would at least see that to save his own ass he must at least pretend remorse and issue a public retraction and apology. Either way I’ll take it. But that’s not enough, Jan. For I am also here as an advocate for everyone else you’ve fallaciously labeled and mentally abused. Prove those too. Show your listeners that the entire universe except your supporters are a band of trolls, that all of those who criticize (or laugh uncontrollably) you and your “Trivium as God” religion are in fact a combination, a conspiratorial paid force out to get you. Your self-righteousness is astounding.

After a few months of reflection now, I realize that you have presented me with the perfect opportunity to teach you an extremely needed and deserved lesson in humility — one that you may learn from and hopefully improve yourself for the benefit of yourself and your listenership, whom in my opinion you have a duty and responsibility to as an somewhat influential public speaker and researcher. Indeed, this type of chance to improve and assist you in such endeavors through public embarrassment and well-deserved ridicule doesn’t often present itself in such a perfect fashion. But that’s what friends do for each other, no matter how painful it is in the short term. And so I am going to jump on this opportunity in the only rational, reasonable, and moral fashion it allows me to. To this end, and in the spirit of your own Trivium-based requirements, I hereby challenge you to PROVE YOUR CLAIM!

I challenge you to protect your own reputation and name by proving your nonsensical accusations, not merely about myself but all the others you have used and abused. Show me the evidence. Show everyone the evidence publicly. Prove your claims directed at my father and about myself. If my father was CIA, I certainly want to know about it. And if I am CIA or for that matter anything at all related to some government agency, I want to start getting paid for it, dude, let alone be told what the hell my mission is. Find a single pay-stub! In considering the fact that you suddenly terminated our friendship and professional relationship of more than 8 years over this fantasy you’ve convinced yourself of, that I am an “agent” because my father was (maybe) an “agent” and that I am out to get you like most of your past used and abused acquaintances — you know, all the others you’ve decided it to be a good idea to take a big shit on their foreheads as well — I simply ask you for the proof. Where is it? How can I find it? Where can your listening audience acquire it?

You even had me believing all these guests, friends, and colleagues you’ve thrown under the bus in the past must be part of the evil they. Apparently, the whole of the CIA is after you, Jan, and just about the whole of anyone that speaks critically of your work is as well. According to your crazy-pants rhetoric, by default we all must be CIA or just generically “dirty.” We must be a band of trolls from Trogloditaria. So go now and let me know what my dirt as an agent is, where my agency employment records are, and indeed post publicly when you find any connection between myself or my father to the CIA or any other government or non-governmental agency. I demand it. That’s all I need, since by default I must therefore be CIA if my father was, right? Isn’t that your fallacious logic, even though your sought-after colleague Dave McGowan, who exposed much of this military family information, clearly warned against making such fallacious connections as you have, as if everyone in the military is part of them? My father might have been a willfully ignorant man that loved old war movies and who was overly proud of his military title and actions thereof, as most are, but he was certainly not a part of the intelligence apparatus you have imagined. He was in the third seat of the planes he navigated. I may not be proud of his “service” but I will defend his good nature and name to my death, you piece of shit.

You want to know how ridiculous this is, Jan? I’ll bet all the money I have (which ain’t much) that you don’t even know my father’s first name. I bet you have no information on him whatsoever. I bet you are completely clueless in this regard, but for the few purposely misinterpreted words you heard me say on my show. And yet you have the audacity, the paranoid-schizophrenic gumption and untethered pathologic confidence to say he was an agent for the CIA with such careless abandon? You don’t even have his first name!

What really gets my goat is that you didn’t come to me as a friend and colleague to ask me the truth. You simply assumed it was true. You accused me without trial, without evidence, all based on the story of my father I’ve told multiple times over the years. But for you, it was the first time you heard it; the quick, redacted version I stated this time around. And so your blind followers and financial supporters will consider my name the same as you, not just about myself and my father, but everyone else you’ve spit out of the Gnostic Media shit can like two-hour-old gum. And that is why I’m putting this open letter up, so that everyone might see what you really are, and to stop this veritable witch-hunt led by the paranoid man that cries witch every time someone disagrees with him.

And if I am wrong, and you find such records, I will publicly apologize to you as well. To those on the sidelines, unless this has happened to you as well, you may have no idea how frustrating it is to be accused of something you are not, having no way to disprove it, knowing how utterly ridiculous and unprovable that accusation is. Jan Irvin is a divider, not a uniter. We couldn’t be more different in this regard, and our unique rhetoric shows this well.

With regards to the facts, that’s really all your listening audience should be demanding. In triplicate. Your rhetoric is so loose with regards to people’s name and reputation that it’s hard to believe you have any legitimate audience left. Show me the evidence not just on Clint, but on every single victim of your long chain of accusations and dismissals. The road behind you is particularly bloody. Why did you throw poor Jacob D under the bus? What did he do? Where’s your scoop on Joe Atwill? I may disagree with him, but I don’t openly accuse him of that which I cannot prove just to make myself look better. However, thanks to your influence, I certainly have in the past tended to agree with your assessments of folks as if under Stockholm Syndrome. And to those I may have made any agreeably false accusations because of Jan’s influence, I humbly apologize. We’ve all got to break this snake’s influence and that of others like him to start acting like a united family, because the false brotherhoods we are fighting always remain as brotherhoods, from the freemason to the Jew to the Jesuit, no matter how much they disagree. That is their power. It must become ours as well. And the Truth is the only bond we have left, for the brotherhoods have taken everything else.

Jan, of all the people you have accused of this fallacious connection or employment to the CIA or whatever alphabet code team you have dreamed up, please provide even a modicum of proof regarding myself. Just a little? Please? Anything? Bueller? Bueller?

Chirp… Chirp…

Secondly, I simply and reasonably demand that, since I know you won’t find a damn thing on myself, you must therefore by all standards of decency, morality, and ethics publicly apologize for blatantly lying and character assassinating my name. Just because someone disagrees with you and has evidence to back it up doesn’t mean they work for a government agency nor that they are evil or “satanic” in some way only you, the Great Irvin, delusionist extraordinaire can fathom.

Let’s put another lie of yours to your favorite, promoted, but rarely used Trivium logic test:

How many times and for how many years can you continue to espouse that the CIA or other agency, or perhaps organized trolls or evil leprechauns after your precious gold and raw green coffee beans are trying to shut down your website? I call bullshit, Jan. Show me the proof, Mr. I.T. guy. Essentially, if we examine this claim in its full spectrum, you are trying to pass as truth the fact that the CIA, the NSA, and the rest of the organizational apparatus of the military industrial complex is too inept to shut down your tiny little website, but that they gave it their best shot? LOL! I know you need donations, but does anyone actually believe that if the CIA wanted you dead or your websites and transmissions terminated that it wouldn’t happen by the end of government business hours today, Eastern timezone? Where do these grand delusions come from? After all, whole countries can’t keep the CIA out, let alone you and your unguarded mountain chalet. And don’t you ever stop to consider how ridiculous this notion is? That is what you are indirectly claiming, right, that they are so inept that they can’t break through your intensive countermeasures to kill and erase Gnostic Media? Just who do you think actually believes that? Wow, Jan, you must be some computer wiz to stand so bravely against the entirety of the powers that be, against the entire AI, and against military intelligence itself! Yours is a modern retelling of David vs. Goliath? No paranoia here, right? No logical fallacy? That wasn’t just an unexpected power outage for the entire 3-city grid, right, but was instead a direct attack on the Jan Irvin and Gnostic Media machine so that you couldn’t perform your scheduled podcast of a radio show for one night? LOL!

Gee Jan, you better not board an airplane, or they might shoot it down, willingly sacrificing the other 150 passengers just to shut up the great and powerful Jan “the Oz” Irvin.

Show us the proof. Show us the matrix code. Show us the cyber attacks. Because they seem to happen randomly to everyone else, too. Oh shit, I think they are making it rain right now. They must be controlling the weather so that I stay inside and write this letter to you.

You see, that’s the brilliant part about your particular brand of seemingly scripted, ridiculously demented paranoia. We out here in the digital wasteland cannot prove the negative on this either. We cannot prove that the CIA in cooperation with the Leprechaun Rainbow Liberation Army (LRLA) and the Jews Out To Get Jan Irvin (JOTGJI) and all the other alphabet agencies known and unknown isn’t every day trying to put static upon your airwaves or hacking into your websites to cause gremlin-like digital havoc. Entertaining and even false sympathy-causing as these thoughts are, I still smell a big pile of bullshit, Jan. If they wanted you or your website disappeared, I’d be writing an obituary instead of an open-letter critique from a pointlessly wounded friend and former supporter.

But I can’t support what you’ve become, which I can see is really just what you always have been, now that I’ve taken my rose-colored glasses off.

You have since created an even greater logical fallacy than I had first described in my original critique of the so-called Trivium and its misuse, linked here for posterity:

https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2014/03/10/weaponizing-the-trivium-the-greatest-fallacy/.

This time you are not merely using the Trivium in name only, as a supposedly unbeatable credential, that you “have the trivium and therefore you are correct.” No, at this point you’ve mastered the deflective use of any and all logical fallacies. You’ve learned to wear these fallacies like a badge of courage, like Wonder Woman brandishes her invulnerable bracelets. But your golden lasso is made of strung-together turds, causing people not to speak the truth but to accept your lies as truth, for any disagreement or evidence against you is magically, alchemically transformed into a personal attack against you. You’ve made yourself into a walking strawman, no longer arguing in the first person, no longer relegating anything of reality or that would require any personal responsibility to your actual self, for only the strawman appears now, same pig, different lipstick. You are no longer Jan Irvin, but the strange simulation of your self, a simulacrum (copy without an original). Your persona (mask) is now turned transparent. You’ve become your own martyr, your own hero in your own story, in a complete and utter transference — the fruition of a narcissists’ dream.

To be clear, though anyone’s comment or question will be genuine and attacking the argument, not the messenger (you), in what you espouse to be proper rhetoric based on grammar and logical conclusion, you have seemed to master the art of fallaciously changing every comment or question into a personal attack. You’ve built a strawman argument in and of yourself. It’s like reverse discrimination, but in this case, you’ve entered into a state of perpetual reverse ad hominem, where we, they, and them are all against you simply for challenging your rhetoric (argument and/or sources, or lack thereof). In other words, you take what is correct according to your own precious Trivium method and somehow transform it into an ad hominem. This is interestingly the reverse of the ad hominem fallacy, again like reverse discrimination. To take a disputed fact personally would be to pretend the speaker to be insulting you to avoid having to answer for the ineptness of your own original argument. You’ve created another new fallacy, Jan! You pretend everything is an attack on you by the CIA, someone “dirty,” or a “troll” (or basically anyone that disagrees or challenges you to prove your rhetoric), and that way you don’t ever have to answer for the continuous hairball of fallacious reasoning you perpetually cough up and call it “the Trivium.”

Or are you just calling it god now?

That all said, I have always had a great but in hindsight blind respect for the few in depth research projects you have done, just not your rhetoric. Frankly, you suck on radio as a host, interrupting your guests every two minutes because you can’t help but mention the few names you’ve researched like Gordon Wasson or the Huxley family and their exploits, as if everything is connected through those names through the CIA. After all, the brain software says so, right? There are no other options, no other players but what you’ve uncovered. And this is the epitome of why the Trivum method is flawed. It is only as good as its users total knowledge, the total grammar intake and storage. And as we will cover below, you lie continuously about how much grammar you have actually absorbed.

And what is worse, you connect all of this public information in that digital program called “the brain,” apparently so that you don’t have to use your own. Yet if we were to look fairly and critically at your so-called “brain” data file, we can see nothing more and nothing less than exactly what is portrayed in Hollywood movies and television shows — a depiction of the consummate, popular caste roll of the paranoid conspiracy theorist, with pinned up pictures and newspaper clippings connected by variously colored strings blazoned across the room from wall to wall, like a spider spinning its pointless but artful web while tripping on acid — something you’ve done according to your own words hundreds of times. But the effects are temporary, right Jan? Are they? Hmmm… Maybe in your acid dreams.

Here are some wise words and ponderable questions you might wish to consider:

–=–

clifford-stoll-quote-why-is-it-drug-addicts-and-computer-aficionadosclifford-stoll-merely-that-i-have-a-world-wide-web-page-does-not-giveclifford-stoll-rather-than-bringing-me-closer-to-others-the-time-thatclifford-stoll-data-is-not-information-information-is-not-knowledge

–=–

Your “brain” program is not open-minded, but stands as a barrier to all other knowledge. It excludes further pieces of any puzzle until its user selectively enters those pieces into its database.  Your “brain” has no knowledge, Jan, only data. So essentially, your brain cannot be used according to your rules of the Trivium method, though it’s the perfect tool for a narcissist. Your brain program is merely the trans-humanist, computer model of your own limited mind, minus the crazy, and you consort with it continuously to verify your own brain’s accuracy. In other words, you have become trapped in the circular, limited computer version of your own noggin. You ask your own brain questions, and it answers them to the best of its ability, which is limited to your own inputed information.

One might call this a paradox. Another might say it’s the magic mirror telling its user its reflection is the fairest in all the land… except for your next target. How can your brain grow if you don’t connect more dots, more conspirators against Jan Irvin, against the Trivium as religion? And so you commence in connecting more dots by making them appear in your “brain” from nothingness, with nothing as a source but your own conspiratorial modeling and descriptions.

Information-In-PC

It prevents you from thinking outside of the limitations of its virtual box, until the time where you input any new, always incomplete data you’ve discovered. Its data can never be complete, meaning it can never have correct grammar, meaning it is completely against the Trivium model. And so are you, without realizing it. You’ve become so much like your brain software that, like that non-human computer interface, you cannot distinguish between what is real and what is artificial, what is truth and what is lies. It is inclusive and it is exclusive, acting like a schizophrenic revolving door. It compliments your tortured mind and organizes your theories on conspiracy for you. It tells you exactly what you want to hear, because you programmed it. It’s what you would call an extremely limited hangout, a never-concluding and ultimately useless tool except to a mass-murderer or a vengeance-filled vigilante.

internet-addiction

It fits right in with your fallacious worship of the Trivium as the source of the Bible. LOL! If I asked what you intend to ultimately do with your forever incomplete brain database, I’m sure your answer would ultimately amount to a fancy way of saying bragging rights, to say I told you so. It’s not primary evidence, it has no chain of custody, and so it’s about as valuable in court or to an FBI agent’s dossier as a second-hand youtube video accusing George Bush Jr. of pushing the red button to commence the events of 9-11-2001.

But great job man. Way to use your– or ah, the computers… “brain.”

This is Jan’s Brain file. This is Jan’s Brain file after years of Jan doing drugs.

Any questions?

PC-Addiction

So here’s your chance to vindicate yourself, Jan, for what it’s worth. Just put me into your brain! Not the fucked up one dangling upon your shoulders, but the supposedly researched one on your computer. You know, the one people can download if you ignore the malware warnings of a “compression bomb,” in case they don’t mind an incredible array of malicious spy and mal-ware?

Talk about narcism – I’m Jan Irvin. Please download my self-programmed brain, so that you can stop being inferior to me and start thinking like I do. LOL!

Your life has become the manifestation of an Escher masterpiece:

880e1f7c71ecf950de5dde824a900270

But let us hit the nail squarely on the head before we continue here…

One comment I heard lately regarding your online presence and personality dis-order was shockingly accurate in its descriptiveness of your behavior-isms, and so I would like to offer here a comparative analysis of that armchair diagnosis to see if it might be relevant to your particular disposition, Jan. The more anyone knows you, the more of these traits ring true.

I defer here to an external link for this purpose, where I have placed in bold the traits that seem to fit your actions, and highlighted in red those that are quite evident in your personality… those that fit like a glove:

What Is A Narcissistic Sociopath?

  • A narcissistic sociopath is someone with a combination of narcissistic personality disorder and definitive behavioral signs of sociopathy.
  • People with narcissism are characterized by their excessive and persistent need for others’ admiration and positive reinforcement. They generally have grandiose opinions of themselves and believe they are superior to other people. Narcissists are also frequently convinced that they are above the normal responsibilities and obligations of everyday life, so they usually have significant difficulties maintaining employment or relationships as a result.
  • The narcissistic sociopath has this type of personality along with a noticeable lack of regard for the rights of others and a tendency to regularly violate those rights.

One noted difference between a narcissistic sociopath and people with narcissism alone is that:

  • The narcissist with the sociopathy reacts strongly and sometimes even violently to negative feedback. True sociopaths generally do not respond to criticism or care what others may think of them.
  • A narcissistic sociopath is unable to tolerate criticism and needs constant praise, as well as deference from other people. Many with this condition present themselves in the best light possible and are able to easily charm others to gain their trust.

THE MALIGNANT PERSONALITY:

These people are mentally ill and extremely dangerous! The following precautions will help to protect you from the destructive acts of which they are capable.  To recognize them, keep the following guidelines in mind:

(1) They are habitual liars. They seem incapable of either knowing or telling the truth about anything.

(2) They are egotistical to the point of narcissism. They really believe they are set apart from the rest of humanity by some special grace.

(3) They scapegoat; they are incapable of either having the insight or willingness to accept responsibility for anything they do. Whatever the problem, it is always someone else’s fault.

(4) They are remorselessly vindictive when thwarted or exposed.

(5) Genuine religious, moral, or other values play no part in their lives. They have no empathy for others and are capable of violence. Under older psychological terminology, they fall into the category of psychopath or sociopath, but unlike the typical psychopath, their behavior is masked by a superficial social facade.

For more and for update from http://www.mcafee.cc/Bin/sb.html

Profile of the Sociopath

  • Glibness and Superficial Charm
  • Manipulative and Cunning – They never recognize the rights of others and see their self-serving behaviors as permissible. They appear to be charming, yet are covertly hostile and domineering, seeing their victim as merely an instrument to be used. They may dominate and humiliate their victims.
  • Grandiose Sense of Self – Feels entitled to certain things as “their right.” May state readily that their goal is to rule the world.
  • Pathological Lying – Has no problem lying coolly and easily and it is almost impossible for them to be truthful on a consistent basis. Can create, and get caught up in, a complex belief about their own powers and abilities. Extremely convincing and even able to pass lie detector tests.
  • Not concerned about wrecking others’ lives and dreams. Oblivious or indifferent to the devastation they cause. Does not accept blame themselves, but blames others, even for acts they obviously committed.
  • A Sociopath is always “pitting” people against each other. My Sociopath
  • Smear Campaign:  A Sociopath will always be smearing someone and inciting people against each other.  Sociopaths do not want people to like or get along with each other and will try todivide and conquer.”  They will say odd things to people in the social group: “She doesn’t like you” or “She doesn’t want me doing anything with you.” My Sociopath
  • Sociopath has a strange network of Support People ranging fromconsultants,” to skilled-workers, to enabling co-dependents that back him up when he wants to go after his Target. Most of the Support People have their own Psychological problems. My Sociopath
  • No conscienceLack of Remorse, Shame or Guilt.
  • Believe they are all-powerful all-knowing, entitled to every wish, no sense of personal boundaries, no concern for their impact on others.
  • The end always justifies the means and they let nothing stand in their way.
  • Shallow Emotions: When they show what seems to be warmth, joy, love and compassion it is more feigned than experienced and serves an ulterior motive. Outraged by insignificant matters, yet remaining unmoved and cold by what would upset a normal person. Since they are not genuine, neither are their promises.
  • Incapable of real human attachment to another.
  • Does not perceive that anything is wrong with them.
  • Authoritarian
  • Secretive
  • Paranoid
  • Callousness/Lack of Empathy
  • Drama King: There is always conflict going on in a Sociopath’s life and it involves abad person,” “bad business orbad transaction.” My Sociopath.

For complete list: http://www.mcafee.cc/Bin/sb.html

 

Antisocial Personality Disorder Overview
(Written by Derek Wood, RN, BSN, PhD Candidate)

There currently is no form of psychotherapy that works with those with antisocial personality disorder, as those with this disorder have no desire to change themselves, which is a prerequisite.

Over time, she says, their appearance of perfection will begin to crack,” but by that time you will have been emotionally and perhaps financially scathed.

Taken in part from MW — By Caroline Konrad — September 1999

Holy crap! If the shoe fits! My God, man. Mamma always said don’t go pokin’ a sociopath while its basking in its own narcissistic glory, but how can I resist? So you aren’t just a dick on purpose, but instead likely suffer from a grandiose mental illness? Being a dick to you is like having the uncontrollable Tourettes Syndrome, isn’t it? Because honestly, reading this list is like reading the introduction section of the Jan Irvin behavioral handbook 101 — subtitled as: how to use and be a complete dick to everyone and still get donations!

How did I not see this before? We are diametrically opposed, complete opposites. Yet it is said opposites attract. Perhaps that explains the repulsion I experienced when we actually met in person (described below). And indeed, as we all can see and as many have experienced first hand, you treat your audience as a “strange network” – enabling co-dependents that back {you} up when {you} want to go after {your} Target. Examples of this behavior are listed below as well.

To be fair, I can’t just state this general diagnosis outright here and attempt to apply it to you without giving the personal examples (proofs) that cause me to presume it applies to you, now can I? I don’t wish to attack you, only to liberate my conscious of all the dirty little secrets and discussing behaviors I’ve witnessed and kept about you all this time. But that’s what victims do, now isn’t it? For victims of the sociopath confuse what they believe to be friendship with what is actually victimhood. But suddenly, victims are finding a friendly ear, a friendly world to their victimhood, and they are coming out against people exactly like you.

Now, I wouldn’t want to be accused of dipping into any of that classic circular logic pattern of excuses from the Jan Irvin logical fallacy library. Oh, you’ll try to call it just that, I’m sure, as if anything I’ve said so far isn’t true. You’ll say this is a “hit piece” by an “agent” or “troll.” Yada yada yada. How about calling it exactly what it is, the truth? But alas, as we now know, the sociopath takes no personal responsibility. I get it. Thus any apology would be malcontent and only for show anyway. Of course the sociopath can do no wrong, and you’ve certainly denied events I’ve described between us before without even a glimmer of remorse (perhaps because you were too stoned to remember or care), have never taken the blame for anything, never apologized for being a dick or other colorful metaphors, and finally decided it was time to deliver me as your latest victim of a sociopathic smear campaign you believed would protect your narcissistic nature and cause you to look like, yet again, the Great Irvin standing morally tall above the rest.

It all makes a certain sick sense now…

But what you may not understand yet, Jan, is that this open letter is not a smear campaign, and does not require whatever ridiculous, fallacious response and defense you might attempt to post. No, this letter is not for your benefit or even an attack against you, but is being written for the benefit of the rest of your victimized audience, who generally have no idea how you use and abuse them, asking them as your “strange network of supporters” to find “dirt” and do “hatchet jobs” on those you’ve chosen to degrade and throw under the bus in order to make you look like some kind of hero or moral authority. What a wicked scheme you have going on here. Someone needs to expose it for what it is, and you inadvertently chose me to do it when you threw me away like a used condom, and even more so when you chose to disrespect the honor of my father, my family. We are all your victims in one way or the other. And we must worship you and ignore your shortcomings (and they’re all short) if we don’t want to be voted off the island. We must either become and act like you or be accused of being the opposite. For you, your latest attack word satanic only means anti-Jan Irvin.

Your perfect little public facade is indeed cracking Jan, judging by the number of blatantly open critiques, forums, emails, and outright no holds barred detractions and WTF’s directed towards your latest rhetoric. Like those Hollywood tramps that are at least pretending to be victims instead of willing participants, I feel a bit late coming out and telling my own story of your exploits in narcissistic sociopathy towards myself and others. But it’s a story that must be told, for your future exploits, trials, and public ostracizing of innocent people must be warned against, as must what may happen to them when they put their trust in you. Like the grand inquisitor heading a witch hunt, we users of brooms to sweep the floors must look out for one another, lest our brooms be said by you to have secret, government issued license plates with hidden agendas, as the whole of all broom owners in the world organize into covens so as to plan our next trolling of the implacable Jan Irvin. We must get his goat at all costs. We must spend our entire lives polluting his email, his comment section, his forums, and his website, or else our central intelligence coven (CIC) might be discovered. We really have nothing else to do, anyway. You might discover some easy-to-find public quote of ours from a blog stating our mutual connections and then claim to have found it occulted in some obscure journal only Jan Irvin and his “brain” could possibly find. And then you might talk about it or write about it, just like Alex Jones, never ever doing anything about it except exposing our brilliant but non-existent plans and how they are working to destroy not only America, but more importantly the Jan Irvin empire, if a website and radio show could be somehow considered as an empire. Yes, exposure without consequence or action… we in the government clandestine operations can’t have that now can we?

Oh wait, isn’t that our whole purpose, to let people like you expose us without consequence? Now I’m confused. Remember the dialectic (logic)… problem, reaction, solution. You don’t even contemplate that you are not their problem but their solution, do you Jan?

Well gee, maybe that’s a good thing after all. Maybe we let Irvin expose our CIA agenda with no other purpose than to incessantly talk about it with no intention of doing anything about it? That was the underlying theme of the very first episode of the show Black Mirror, wasn’t it? Hell, Jan, what is it that you think they are actually worried about with you anyway? What have you actually done? I mean honestly, you’ve had about as much effect on the CIA and its clandestine operations as a nature photographer has on an antelope being chased down and devoured by a pack of hyenas. Your essays are nothing more than a time-exposure videography of what has already happened, and they read like watching the grass grow. You’ve done nothing but over-expose the picture, which, while it created a novel, unique piece of art, sits dormant as the useless information it is. You are a passive observer at best, and an annoying master of the I told you so parrot call so at worse. Sure, everything you do and write has the appearance of being impressive. But, like a fishbowl, your work serves no purpose except to support the life of the fish. Your work is on its own life support system. If people lose interest, realizing there is nothing they can actually do with such useless information, that it holds or supports no actual substance, then the fishbowl no longer has a reason to exist. Like a fiction novel, what you’ve reported only serves to help the very agencies and personas you are supposedly exposing, placing them as nothing more than histories past, present, and future untouchables.

But let’s get back to your narcissistic sociopathy, shall we?

Here it goes, and this is but a partial list of your questionable behavior over the years that I remained silent and protective of, a case of classic Stockholm Syndrome…. I share these factual events not as slander, not as an attack, not as revenge or malice, but simply because I cannot prove the negative you threw at me. I am left no choice.

Hashtag: Hey Jan, you screwed with the wrong guy this time!

  1.  Firstly, and most importantly to this whole circle of events, in what was either another paranoid, bullshit story or what I thought to be a true one (who knows at this point), you told both myself and one of your other guests named Jacob Deullman on a three-way Skype call quite seriously and glibly and in great detail, that you were personally visited by an “old acquaintance” from high school that is now forced to do occasional odd jobs for the CIA, as would you be if you accept the offer that they would soon propose. You stated that he told you right before all this craziness happened with me and the advent of all this new strange behavior from you that you should “take the money” that will be soon offered to you when it is indeed offered, that the mysterious they of the CIA were going to essentially make you an offer you apparently cannot refuse, and that they would harass, harm, or kill you and your family/friends if you did not take that forthcoming but yet unrealized monetary offer. Thank God I have a fellow witness to this Skype exchange, as you seem to relish in the denial of such true events. You then assigned both myself and Jacob to secrecy of these facts, which again I obeyed like a little bitch. I even recommended you do something constructive with it or demand private land instead of money so you can help others in transition, those that need help getting out of the system, if that was indeed your choice in the end. No use putting your family in danger. In other words, out of concern for your well-being, never even considering you might be lying or just bat-shit crazy, I bit at your story like a hungry fish, feeling important enough to be entrusted with the secret and yet overtly concerned for what I thought was a friend — the perfect recipe for your brand of fallacious, narcisistic sociopathy to breed. If this was or is a true, continuing story, and not just another fallacious fable falling under the everyone’s-out-to-get-Jan-Irvin column, then what are we to think about your sudden rampage and ultra-strange religious turn since then, which is causing many to question your reputation and word, even in essay and posted formats? Because if you aren’t trying to destroy your reputation and remove yourself as any kind of serious researcher, just as they were by your words instructing you to do, you are certainly doing a good job of it anyway. What am I to think of how you’ve inexplicably and without proof accused myself and my family of being a CIA crime syndicate — guilt by a familial association you cannot even prove? Or is that just business as usual for the sociopathic narcissist? One would surmise, if one were to be so bold and be victimized suddenly and without warning as I and others recently have been by you, those of us who put their trust into you and your Godless religion of the Trivium Trinity (LOL!), that it was in fact you that were bought and paid for by your pretended rogue, nemesis agencies in government. Did you take the offer as you described it to us? This alone places you on a serious hot seat, and should cause all your “fans” that love to get their fair share of abuse from your podcast, comments, and emails to step back and consider just who you are working for? I’ll keep your secrets no more. I’ll not be your victim, and by exposing this I hope others will avoid putting blind faith in your multi-sided, unpredictable, eruptive drama mask. #Timesup dick.
  2. Speaking of your sudden religious tomfoolery with seemingly no feeling, substance, or spirituality behind it, I’m sure I have the same question as everyone else… that being WTF? You took my many years of deep study and language comprehension and basically took a giant Gnostic shit on it. Thanks for that, by the way, dick. I offered you and your listeners the Truth and understanding of the Bible as the foundation of common law and you have completely twisted and turned it into the religion of the Trivium. The Trivium is not God, Jan. Nor is Logos. Logos is man’s conception of God, not God. To say that Logos is God is like saying a gun (instrument) killed someone, not the man wielding it (Source). Seriously, look it up like a primary researcher should. See how that word is used in the Bible. And please, get this through your head — the Bible is NOT the Trivium. LOL! The Trivium doesn’t exist, dude. It is not of God (Nature/Truth) but of man (invention), nor is language, nor numbers, nor does anything True need the Trivium to prove it actually (negatively) exists. Your use of the Trivium as a weapon, as a blanket proof that since you have or use the Trivium, bearing it like a superhero emblem, you are therefore correct is complete nonsense. I call it the ultimate fallacy, the fallacy of all fallacies, that I have the Trivium therefore I am right. For you, the Trivium is a disease, and you certainly have it in that regard. But the sociopath cares not nor is willing to admit that his limited grammar is the very foundation of his rhetoric, and that his rhetoric can indeed only reflect the very limited resources available to him. I’ll give you credit for reading .001% of all information and books out there, but to base your whole conscious awareness on those extremely limited sources, many designed to deceive, most probably written or translated into vulgar (common) English… well, only a sociopath would believe such a limited set of grammar is enough to spout the bullshit you do. And don’t get me started on your Tartary crap. You’ve turned this tool of art into the religion of Jan, JanIrvinanity, no different than it has been used for centuries as such by the lawyer, scribe, Pharisee class. It is completely at odds with the scriptures, not in harmony with the Law of Nature, and the Bible refers to your precious logic as it should, as a dialectic. A trap. When your logic is based on bullshit, when your grammar is limited, then so too shall your rhetoric stink of said shit. Sorry, but logic has been the ruin of societies dating back to the Chinese dynasties. Logicians are legalists! You are missing in so many ways the spiritual, moral balance required to be a user of any such system of logic. Logic is not Natural Reasoning, but actions and rhetoric based on information created by men. There is no Trivium to be found in Nature, in Source, only in man’s sorcery and prestige (trickery). You are a victim of the collective enema of the works of men’s fictions and musings, trying to use and apply that fiction to the scriptural books of Truth and Nature’s Law. It just ain’t going to happen, Jan. And by the way, I just read the directions for the Trivium board game and it said no sociopaths should be allowed to play, lest horrible consequences follow. Sorry.
  3. You have made completely un-foundational and shamelessly sourceless claims against not only myself but my father, a decorated navigator in the Air Force, whom some years ago was buried with honors as a retired Captain from the military, and whom incidentally suffered horrific and disabling health issues due to the poisoning of Monsanto’s “Agent Orange” sprayed in Vietnam, etc., and for which he eventually received full, 100% medical coverage from the Veterans Administration, as many vets have due to activists both in and out of my family that helped others obtain that full coverage. You have accused him of working as an agent for the CIA, just as you do anyone that disagrees or challenges any of your work, and have subsequently made the completely logical fallacy of guilt by association (family) by claiming the same about myself. HEY ASSHOLE, THE CIA POISONED MY FATHER!!! It is public knowledge at this point that they used contracted military men, took their dog-tags away, and left them there to die when they went missing, because this was not even close to a legitimate war but was an illegitimate (legal) Executive operation. They even told families those missing in action were presumed dead, but we don’t know or can’t tell you where. To say he joined and was a member of the CIA and not a victim of its clandestine operations through Executive military cooperation is preposterous, and belittles every other man that was tricked, drugged, experimented on, and left to die in the jungle so as to keep plausible deniability. You fuck! And all these outrageous accusations just happened to occur after you were supposedly approached by the CIA with money to quit your research. Did they pay you to take us all with you? Is that what you had to do to get your new trophy wife? Will you get a puppy if you can take down more than 10 legitimate researchers? As your future ex-wife, I’m sure she will have lots to tell, especially if you ever turn back over to the light side. But this last part is just sarcastic speculation — not even my own, mind you, but of others you’ve harmed.
  4. Afterwords, in stead of telling the truth and stating that I (Clint) compared your research to the flat-earth (specifically the ‘Universal Zetetic Society‘) mentality on my last show (yes, I quit radio because of you, you dick), as appearance-based science instead of methodical, you told your listeners instead that “the CIA played the flat-earth card.” You dishonor my Christian (first) name, my intent, and my actions through this outright lie, being unprovable in any way. If this is not fallacious I don’t know what is? I think the CIA is happy to have you. I think you are doing it an unnecessary service, feigning to be its adversary while sitting on your ass doing nothing but continuously lying to people to sell books and get donations. Hell, on your last show you even charged people to ask you questions? Talk about willing victims. I can’t even imagine doing this, but then I’m not narcissistic. All my time, my effort, my shows, my books, and my blogs are free. What I do to try and help other people you do to feather your own nest. Opposites really do, apparently, attract.
  5. You have taken to now calling me publicly and on your most recent shows by words and false titles like “dirty,” with the implication being that I work for some alphabet agency or other group that is, surprise, out to get you (LOL!), though you’ve given absolutely no reference or proof to what the source of that so-called “dirt” is. In other words, by using these empty descriptions of false flattering titles in a completely logical fallacy-based mode, knowing they can neither bear the burden of positive proof nor be proven as a negative (as a bullshit, purely personal ad hominem attack and lie), you have now caused others to believe, as you say, my well is poisoned just because Jan says so. No proof, no reasoning, just that crazy Trivum logic. Way uncool, man. I am not alone in this, of course, as you seem to throw many of your former guests under the bus in like fashion, often for no apparent reason. Some people even keep track of your legacy of throw-away acquaintances, like a day at the races. Some of us victims have even contacted one another after the fact and joked that we need to form a support group for the victims of Jan Irvin’s fallacious name-calling and insulting rhetoric, those of us inexplicably torn asunder without cause, without proof, and without comprehension of why?
  6. You fool! You made the grave mistake of contacting some of my close friends and readers/listeners, including the incontrovertibly indelible Drew in Canada, in order to help you find “dirt” as a smear campaign on myself and other guests, including a search of Canadian records to try and find pedophilia records for one of your past guests I won’t mention. Deny all you want, we have the emails. This good friend of mine, this charitable salt of the earth up in Canada, actually had to block your emails when he refused to continue cooperating with what I now comprehend as your narcissistically sociopathic, vengeful witch-hunt behavior, after you then referred to him as a follower of satan and engaged him in other outrageously ridiculous name-calling and harassment. All this because he wouldn’t help you try to frame another guest, or find some fallacious connection to yet again destroy the character, not the argument? You must be crazy to try and turn my friends against me as if they believe your fallaciously ill-conceived implications about my character. Or, as the diagnosis fits above, you seem to be narsacistically sociopathic by trying to divide and conquer. Congratulations, Jan, because honestly I’ve never heard of a listener, let alone a group of listeners, having to block a host for harassment and fallacious name-calling! I think you are the first, and Drew will no doubt not be the last to block your attempts at Trivium-based, religo-cyber-bullying. In February, you apparently had already begun a well-orchestrated smear campaign against me, and I only found out recently that you have been dropping your copied and pasted Gnostic shit-piles about me in anyone’s inbox you can, though none of them asked for it. Here is an example from a sweet lady that I went to visit a couple of times in my hometown of Sacramento, to which you carelessly and apparently without forethought didn’t consider she’d eventually share it with me, even after she told you we were friends. Yeah, I must be CIA if I go around having secret lunch meetings 60 year old ladies, you fucking idiot. While I won’t include some of the vulgarities you sent, here are some quotes from that email, the shit you’ve been flinging behind my back to anyone that will listen:

Jan:

These disinfo agents always expose themselves

–Thanks for the heads up.

–Ps. Clint Richardson went dark path too. He’s dirty AF.


(reply) –Jan… your final statement has me reeling….why do you say Clint is dirty?  I’ve met him, had lunches with him…


Jan:

“RE Clint, did you hear his last show attacking me and the trivium and scaliger and Tartary and calling me a Satanist and all else? All coordinated with Miles Mathis’s attack!!!! Hmmm…

I figured out that he’s a homosexual (Left hand path) and misleading people with his version of Christianity

The Book of Mormon makes clear that homosexuals are always behind conspiracy(key unrelated verse)

Due to the shows with Clint I went in and decided read the Bible, Book of Mormon, and Qur’an myself. All I can say is… wow is Clint full of shit. I read after reading the Bible MYSELF, I realized it was TRUE and repented and became a Christian last Autumn

Furthermore reading the book of Mormon, I was astounded at all the natural law I found there, and mentioning it to Bill and Clint, they both went apeshit and started attacking me and refused to read it. I actually suspect the who (two) were playing me behind the scenes.

Clint is a Satanista sort of grand wizard I think. His attack and spin on the trivium is highly revealing.
Clint has been harvesting souls so they don’t repent. I went into bad depression last week when I realized what he was doing and how dark he is the rose on his book, the checkerboard, that artistit’s all occult magic the “Strawman” is what his book actually is (below)… by hiding all of these. There are many dozens of such citations in the Bible and Book of Mormon. There is NO WAY Clint could have confused accepting Christ with flattering titles of a judge, et al. It’s ridiculous. I think he was working with Mark Passio the entire time. He pretended to expose Mark to gain my trust.”

–=–

So where to begin here, Jan? How does one counter such fallacious rhetoric without delving into your own narcissistic sociopath model that would be required to even fathom such nonsense?

Well, let me put on my “grand wizard” hat for this one… LOL!

For my friends that were with me at the conference and whom shared in my own exposure of Mark Passio, which included you, Jan, no one can possibly believe such nonsense. You have the gaul to use my discovered information on his real name and what the word Passio actually means, and give me no credit now for your own usage of those facts. Typical sociopathy. This accusal is so ridiculous, so narcissistic and wildly conspiratorial and unprovable, that I cannot even fathom how to follow up on it. Yet again, there is no negative I can prove to counter your positively fallacious association of my name with known satanists, even ones that I exposed as still being such. So I won’t waste the effort here. If your fans, your strange network of supporting victims, are actually damaged enough by you to be able to accept such nonsensical, fallacious shit then you deserve each other. You are exactly what your victims (fans) need.

I attack your use and especially misuse of the Trivium, not the Trivium itself. I wouldn’t criticize a hammer for its misuse by its user. I criticize and stand firmly against your fallacious misuse of it and placement of it on a pedestal as that which is worthy of god-like worship that it is not even close to being qualified to stand upon, as I would a magistrate using his false authority to label anyone a witch or a priest a saint.

A criminal or a cardinal, they’re both frightened of angels (messengers). (–The Fixx)

Now let’s speak to your conversion from doper extraordinaire to so-called “Christian.” The first show we did on the Bible entitled “Red Pill Sunday School” was May 16, 2017. And yet you claim to have finally read the Bible yourself at the earliest then after this show — thus, not until the last half of 2017. The next show we did was actually already in “autumn,” on September 19, 2017, and there was no sign of Jan Irvin debating or doubting anything I had to say about the Bible, quite the opposite in fact. Our next show was in October, and again, no debate or sign of psychopathy. Yet in the above email you claim that during this time (not sure how or when) you were somehow able to have “repented and became a Christian” in “autumn” of 2017, which is of course between the months September and November. This adds up, as I would now expect, to be just another impossible lie. So you are claiming to have read the Bible and the Book of Mormon for the first time in, conservatively, less than two months, and suddenly became a Christian by such efforts? Oh, and let’s not forget the part where you say that you finally, actually “read the Bible yourself” just before autumn, 2017. Jan, you have been telling me you’ve read the Bible for years now, even pulling up your computer program to “prove” it. So here you expose yet another of your own lies, unable to keep track of them all on your twisted, ever-changing, demented timeline. You use the Bible like you use the Trivium, right? You have the Bible in possession and therefore you know it and can quote from it and are right? You have the Trivium and therefore you know whatever topic you discuss and are right? But now you admit you’ve never read the bible till late 2017? Liar – Liar – Pants on fire! I, of course, knew you hadn’t read it and still think you haven’t, because instead of speaking in its authority and words with confidence you simply prove you have possession of the Bible as a physical and digital, computer version with concordances and lexicons, and therefore magically, gnosticly possess its knowledge. What took Clint 5 years of full-time study only took Jan a couple of months! That’s incredible… and complete bullshit. I wonder if you actually read any books at all, or just collect them to say (prove) fallaciously that my library collection of books therefore proves I read? You obviously haven’t read my book, Jan, if only because I ask readers only to comment on it if they have read the full contents, which your comments make clear you have not. And the Bible? How many times can I say it, you just can’t read it in English (dog-Latin) without looking up the words in their Greek, Hebrew, and Latin (etc.) forms and origin of intention. Anyone that grows up speaking Greek as a first language, for instance, will tell you that Greek is not able to be properly translated into English, for English is a literal language and verse (poetry/metaphor/allegory) simply cannot be expressed properly in English. Yet you somehow mastered it in a matter of months. Wow! Impressive. You’re so psychotic at this point that you probably think you can enter the Bible characters into your brain program! I bet Moses was CIA for sure… And Jesus, totally controlled opposition, right? What you’ve revealed by your rhetoric is that you’ve embraced religion, not the Bible. Religion is not the Bible. Religion is usually opposed to the Bible.

Now, what can I possibly say about myself being satanic, since the darkly angelic Jan Irvin has now resorted to calling everyone that disagrees with him by this epitaph? Can’t prove a negative, so that’s out. Such slander is not just inexcusable but amazingly without any merit or understanding of the word itself whatsoever. You’ve actually found a way to fallaciously personify the word satanic, a word that simply means adversarial, into your narcissistic sociopathy and rhetoric. You’ve made your strawman persona (mask) with God-like qualities, so that the term satanic actually means opposed to Jan Irvin and his Trivium brand of fine logic. You basically accuse anyone and everyone now of being satanic if they don’t agree with your worldview and its digital brain feed. You’ve pulled this word right out of its proper usage in the Bible, as what is adversarial against Jehovah (Nature), and narcissistically applied it to yourself instead. I would certainly love to see any proof whatsoever that I’m working with Mark Passio and Bill Joslin, let alone some guy named Miles Mathis that I didn’t know existed till a month ago. Even your listeners questioned why you put myself and Bill Joslin together, as we were until then unaware of each other’s work? The sociopathic answer: to cause us to first become adversarial to each other and then at least one of us to become adversarial to yourself, because this sociopathic destruction and tearing apart of others is what feeds the entire machine you’ve built. Simply stated, you need adversaries to exist in your false persona, in the simulacra you’ve built up. But you know, as a registered soul harvester like me, it gets very hard to keep names with faces. A soul here and a soul there, everywhere a soul soul. It’s True, I’m only interested in each and every one of my listeners, my friends, my readers and my family’s best interest, that is, in the well-being of their souls. If that is harvesting souls, then I stand guilty as charged. LOL! Idiot.

Finally, we see the narcissistic sociopathic pattern emerge that I must be doing what I’m doing, even when exposing a satanist like “Passio” for what he is, I’m only doing it to gain Jan Irvin’s trust. Mirror, mirror on the wall… Everything’s about Jan, for Jan must appear in his digital podcaster reflection as being the fairest of them all. All others must be destroyed or made to appear less than Jan. We’re all out to get Jan, even if we don’t know it. If we appear fairer than Jan in any way, we must be sacrificed to the alter of Jan’s ego. Yeah, Jan, that’s become the whole reason why I take a shit too. I arrange the toilet paper in homage to your initials before I flush. You’re not the wind beneath my wings, dude. You are but a foul air permeating from already corrupt, spoiled airways.

Now we arrive at my apparent sexuality. How did you possibly “figure out” that I’m a homosexual? Well, that was certainly out of thin air! Was it a Trivium-based mathematical formula, or are you just being a dick again? Well, since I cannot prove a negative, for arguments sake let’s say its true. So I’m therefore responsible for and “behind all conspiracy,” that is, me and my fellow, organized homosexuals out there? The gay mafia? Ok, I’ll bite. After all, if the Book of Mormon says so by Jan’s interpretation, it must therefore be true, right, though the verse you pointed to in reference speaks of combinations (conspiricies) of men, not gay bars and nightclubs, you sociopathic idiot. Can this really be taken as anything but ad hominem, an attack on the messenger, or some other fallacious attack designed to steer the argument away from the subject? Are the CAFR reports I read, which are printed by government and independently audited somehow less authentic or less official because I might be one of the that man-on-man persuasion? Or indeed, is it that the entire auditing department of government part of the gay mafia? Or perhaps I’m wrong because I’m apparently homosexual, and therefore I’m behind whatever conspiracy or lie that is against (adversarial to) you by default? What fallacy is that, Jan? Choose your poison. But let’s go even further… what if, in fact, I’m actually bisexual, Jan? Does that mean I’m at least half right, half innocent, and really involved in only half of the conspiracies against you? Oh, I know, what if I’m just asexual, what would that mean? Does that surpass even the heterosexual persuasion, meaning that my research is somehow legitimate even more than 100% of the time? Would that make me even better or more right than you, oh master of male sexuality? Or perhaps you come up with this one just because you are a narcissist, that I participated in your shitty interviews because I wanted to bed you? For anyone actually interested, as my book is now printed and free to download, you may read my final word on the subject on page 491, which applies to all men (male and female) without exception and without fallacious name-calling. But more importantly, it seems your particular projection of fallacious reasoning here is that because you are heterosexual, you are therefore… what? Right? Righteous? Less of a dick? Qualified for angel-hood or heaven in the afterlife? On the “right” path? If you are suggesting some moral superiority, well then you’ll want to keep reading as I expose your own behavior towards the female of the species, one of the signs that I knew spelled we were absolutely not the same in any way, and that the pit that is your moral degradation had no limit (see next section). One last note: AIDS was a biological weapon introduced into the “homosexual” population of men through vaccinations only offered for free to gay men, claiming to prevent certain strains of Hepatitis. I found this in my vaccine research. So the homosexuals hate themselves, too, since they are behind all conspiracies, even the ones targeted to their own depopulation? And I suppose they are not allowed to marry ac other because of the homosexual conspirators as well, because it only makes sense that they would want to be banned from the social and civil rights of others? You have now bordered on the ridiculous in your spin. I’m flattered.

And now to the book, my book, which you are literally judging out loud by its cover. But when Jan Irvin does it, it’s not fallacy, right Jan? LOL! Yet again the logical fallacy rules over Jan Irvin’s reasoning and words without him even being aware of it – the rhetoric of a completely uninformed snitch (an oxymoron). The rose on my book, if you had read it, is indeed a secret symbol of the elite. Therefore, I must be an elite, right? The symbol is guilty as charged. But why is it used as such by the author, that is the question? The symbol of the rose generally means that secrets are kept beneath it, which is why you see it on government buildings, Masonic halls, old churches, the Queen’s monuments, Mormon Church buildings, etc. The art on my book instead displays the extending of that rose, as the revealing of the secrets hidden about the concept of a strawman and in the Law, both legal and scriptural. Actually, it’s quite neat. I’m proud of it and the artist. But in this fallacy, because I used a symbol from them I must be one of them. Well then, Jan, by this logic every time you quote Huxley or use the symbols as you do on your website and books, you must therefore also be one of them. Which they, I don’t know, because I don’t think that way. You see, Jan, as you know, which they doesn’t matter to the construction of your sociopathic, narcissistic fallacies, only that they must be believed to exist and that I used one of their symbols. Never mind that I used it against them and their intentions, as the opposite of what they use it for, which is to keep secrets. You have of course used this fallacy on your other guests too, and said as much about Jordon Maxwell, Joe Atwill, and others. But then, we all apparently are working together to thwart your work, right Jan, so in your mind it makes perfect sense? That’s what you have been saying like a bumbling fool. You are the only one actually guilty of your own accusation, as is often the case. We all tried to work with you, and you not only turned us against you but against each other! But then that is the recipe for sociopathy as I comprehend it. Oh, and the symbol for christ, the fish, which is visibly floating over the checkerboard without touching it — that’s a symbolic symbol of christ walking on water (the sea of commerce/legality), unlike those pawns that represent you and me. The checkerboard is jurisdiction, of which the free man under the Law of Nature (Law of God) has no attachment, like the floating fish (example of Christ). Again, you could have asked. But instead, you choose to create vast conspiracies in your messed up “brain.” Oh, and the artist himself is a struggling comic/graphic novelist that wants to do good with his work just as I did, the reason I quit Hollywood, and who decided to help me without fee. He was indeed a Godsend, not a devil, you asshole.

–=–

Now, let me throw a fallacy back at you Jan, so that you may understand not only how ridiculous your own rhetoric is, but that you cannot prove that its not true (can’t prove a negative). Here goes: since there are no halos in the Bible, only in the artworks of cults and religions, and since the halo comes from the God of Ra, you must therefore worship Ra as your false god because you put a halo on your book-cover.

Makes sense, if you are a fucking nut.

What you might want to ask yourself is this: why is this exposure of your severe, unadulterated shortcomings being delivered by yours truly at this moment, Jan?

Answer: because you actually didn’t read the Bible in the spirit intended, and you aren’t following it as the Law of Nature (existence). Instead some false religion (apparently from your new illegitimate “wife” and Mormon “guest”) has a strangling influence upon you. You’ve forced my hand by your false judgements of me and my family, leaving me no other choice that I might clear my own and my father’s name from your condemnation, your false measure. Though I forgive you, I want you to know that the Bible would have saved you from this ridiculousness. For it clearly instructs:

–=–

Judge not, that ye be not judgedFor with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.

Matthew 7:1-2, KJB

Judge not, and ye shall not be judged: condemn not, and ye shall not be condemned: forgive, and ye shall be forgiven

 —Luke 6:37, KJB

–=–

What you reap you will sow, Jan. You just had to piss off the right man, leaving him no recourse than to do exactly what I’m doing here. And you did…

These verses are not mere suggestions, but stand as the Law of Nature (Truths). Action vs. reaction, where the moral teaching (parable) is to prevent the reaction (return judgement) by avoiding the initial, action (false judgement) while it’s still avoidable (not made public). Forgiveness must come before actions in judgement. To condemn based on lies is the furthest from emulating christ and God’s Nature (Truth). And your actions in false judgment then force the hand of others seeking such avoidance, who must protect their name (fictional persona/reputation) then as if it is their actual self. The Law of Nature (God), the Bible, is not there for you to use in judgment against others, but to emulate in your own actions of forgiveness, love, and compassion. You not only broke the Law but force my hand to do the same.

You see, what you reap is what shall be sowed upon you, either out of spite, revenge, or from necessity in my case. When you judge, especially without proofs, then one must judge you as ones only defense. In other words, you brought this upon yourself, Jan, by playing the character of the fool exactly as the Bible describes it and incessantly warns against. Instead, you keep claiming to be following what must be a very lonely “right-hand path” instead of the “left-hand” one, which is not in any way a Biblical connotation, and has nothing to do with Christ or the scriptures.

So what is this so-called “right-hand path?”

One thing for sure, it’s not in the Bible, and should not be confused with being on the “right-hand of God,” a metaphor meaning to act christ-like under the Law of God (Nature).

However, a quick search of any website regarding witchcraft and the occult reveals our answer. For instance:

“The distinctions Right Hand and Left Hand Path are usually only applied to traditions which are associated with the occult and magic but they can sometimes be applied to any religion or philosophical tradition. Generally the labels are used more specifically to differentiate Left Hand Path practitioners from those on the Right Hand Path who are often regarded as being the norm that Left Handers deviate from. Hence, many Right Hand Pathers don’t even recognise or use the term to refer to themselves. The terms left-hand and right-hand paths in Western occultism are often attributed to (i.e. made popular by) Theosophy founder Helena Blavatsky but in fact can be traced back to various Eastern practices and definitions.”

–=–

What a surprise, eh? Not really, since your listeners have commented many times about your use of occultist and theosophic terms like this. But then, a good chunk of your research came from such Theosophic sources in your early works, did they not, Jan? I certainly remember that being my own biggest critique of your early works. So, do you make it a general rule in your “research” to twist and misuse every damned thing you touch and see? Can this devilish persona (mask) of “Jan Irvin” even exist without spinning everything first and then calling it “unspun” just because Jan Irvin has now officially spoken on the subject? It’s like a grocery store having a sale by first marking up the price and then putting it on sale for the original price. Your life’s work is essentially a spin sale, upon which you place the empty title of unspun.

The other mistake you consistently make, which I have in depth addressed, is the use of the phrase “natural law,” which is often opposed to the “Law of Nature,” also known as the “Law of God.” After our shows with Bill Joslin, I did not attack Bill as you did, but instead dedicated a show to this misunderstanding of terms, of which you both suffered. Many will convince themselves that such semantics matter not, and they will continue to use these terms interchangeably. Big mistake!

Here is a link to that show, dedicated to helping (not hating) Bill Joslin (and all others) in his understanding of and distinction between these terms because of your attempts to cause us to be instead adversarial to each other:

https://corporationnationradioarchives.wordpress.com/2017/12/26/red-pill-sunday-school-episode-14-december-24-2017/

In essence, unlike you, Jan, I took the critique of my colleague at being able to explain these concepts and I turned it into what I believe is the best show I’ve ever done, because I wanted to be absolutely uncompromised in my rhetoric. I didn’t just resort to name-calling and fallacious character assassination, I corrected my own shortcomings. I took self-responsibility to ensure I wasn’t misleading or obfuscating that which I sought to communicate. I can’t remember a time that you’ve done this, Jan.

Let’s be honest. There have been many others like myself, we being the unwitting receivers of the Gnostic Media 1-2 punch and curse, run over by the Gnostic bus, all of us thinking it a wise juncture to make innocent comments, helpful critiques, or simply leave provable contradictions to what one disgruntled emailer calls as the “Trivium guy!” But now, they (we) are coming out similar to Hollywood’s abused and exploited actresses (that prostituting A-list of professional liars), all making the same claims of abuse together, mostly about what a total dick you are to us all and to most others. Some even still donate to you — like after you squash a fly and its wings still jitter from nerves despite the abuse — showing how sociopaths truly can manipulate and get ahead as politicians, bankers, and of course certain podcasting authors, causing those you harm to turn around and support their own pain-stick. How many of your listeners have had to block your harassing emails, Jan, and why didn’t I think of that? LOL! I am certainly not the first or only victim of this bizarre behavior, as the virtual blood trail from your particular magic bus syndrome of shroom, DMT, and LSD madness seems endless, let alone claims of your own time spent in the psych ward. Now that I have received so many emails from others that have been brow-beaten by you both publicly and in private communications, which make you sound like the utter lunatic you’ve become (or rather, always have been), I can at least take comfort in our mutual victimization. I can have a bit more confidence to name you as the predator you are.

You remember when you said that hallucinogens should be called suggestogens because of the hypnotic suggestibility they put their users in? Well now, how many times have you “used” the CIA’s special candies again? 100’s? Do I hear 500, a 1,000 doses?

And to think, I didn’t recognize all this as a psychological pattern till way too late, wishing and perhaps remaining purposefully ignorant so as to stay on your good side — which is like being on the right hand side of a crashing airplane. Ironically, I was trying to stay friends with one of the main culprits of tearing people apart out there, not realizing I was already part of the virtual carnage left behind after being thrown under the bus for no qualifiable reason.

I could go on with this particular list (above), but let us instead speak about the moral aspect of Mr. Jan Irvin… or lack thereof. Because there appears to me to be none to be found. Are you what you pretend to be? Is your heterosexuality a qualifier meaning you are also a moral gentleman to the women you’ve used and desecrated? I learned the answer to this when I came to your home in California to visit, and where between that trip and our other private conversations, I learned about the real Jan Irvin:

1. To top it off, though I will not mention names, you were proud to inform me of the affair you were then having with one of your past guests, despite the fact that she was married with a severely mentally handicapped, autistic child, even as you still pretend moral conviction and superiority in such matters on air. I overlooked this and many other oddities and moral depredations, an action I now adamantly regret…

2. including that brand-spanking new Jeep that had to cost at least $60-70,000. Yes, when I visited you there at your home a few years ago, there it was — brand new and shiny. Beats my piece of shit, 1998 4-Runner valued at about $3,500, although at least I have no debt to cover. Do your “fans” know about this purchase, or do they think you use those donations to actually live as the meager and honest researcher you pretend to be? Did you announce that this overloaded dick-mobile was where all their money was going, or did you get credit and now must solicit money every second to pay it off? Do those who are already harmed by and disenfranchised from this system and who believe you to be one of them (us) know where their money is going to — another charlatan selling himself as a down and out and a desperate researcher, induced into obscurity and income deficiency by secret government agents so he can pay his luxury taxes? You even drove like an asshole all day with no consideration of common law or common sense, signs, or lines, showing no sign of respect to other drivers or to women in general, making vulgar comments with every new set of tits or ass that reared itself.

3. Also, while there visiting, you suggested to me something that I found not only unbelievable but tortuously unhinged. You told me that I should use my radio fame, as you do, to get laid. Firstly, Jan, I don’t at all confuse my extremely limited and censored infamy and internet open-broadcasting that anyone can do nowadays with even the remotest hint of fame, and neither should you. Of course, if I’m indeed trying to reason with a narcissist, such advice is useless. You’re so famous that from what I can tell you aren’t even censored like some of us actually are, and in fact are still appearing at the top of most search engines! Secondly, your complete and utter disregard for the moral treatment of women in this and so many other ways was so foreign to me that again I felt like the hollywood grunt or intern trying to get ahead by keeping your jackass behavior, the real you, a public secret. I went through this in Hollywood, working for some real duche-bags, and had to pretend friendship and respect to get ahead in the company. That’s one reason why I left. Well no more, Jan. I won’t comment on your sudden engagement to what some are even calling your new handler, your door prize for playing the devil, this mail-order bride to be from Maine. I don’t know her. But from what I’ve seen of your narcissistic, sociopathic behavior, she is sure to be your future-ex wife in no time at all if anything real exists in that relationship. Or perhaps you are two birds of the same feather?

4. Perhaps my favorite fallacy of yours, and the one that most describes your true moral character, was when you told me that your personal feeling on the way you can personally get back at “them” for their depopulation agenda and genocide was to “fuck” as many women as possible to try and get them pregnant with illegitimate children, to have as many kids as you can born out of wedlock. I couldn’t even respond to that one, Jan, and I remember thinking at the time that this day of hot-rodding around the mountain towns up there in the new Jeep couldn’t have been over any quicker. Meeting you in person was like seeing santa claus drunk in the back alley of Macy’s for the first time, meeting what you thought was a hero but realizing quickly the opposite. It was like the worst kind of bad date, and the only happy ending was when I put my rental car in drive, made like a tree, and leaved.

–=–

Finally, a few comments from your recent Q & A show posted at Gnostic Media, which is the perfect example of why sociopaths purposefully do not conduct call-in shows with their audiences:

  1. You have admitted several times in the past to being part of the “royal” bloodline, privately and on air, directly related to several (actually all) US presidents, etc, of which I have done extensive genealogical research upon. In other words, technically, you are one of them by your own logic of association, just as I must be CIA if my father was, right Jan? You even had me talk privately to your royal-blooded mother for over an hour to try and explain what I had learned about private citizens and land from my guest KW and how your family was indeed the stock of “white persons” of the posterity of the US constitution’s preamble (purpose), qualified to be landholders or take back the land that was escheated from your family. Yet when someone asked you the perfectly legitimate question during your show of what blood-type you are, you reverted back to calling them a troll. Why? Why not just answer the question. All presidents that I am aware of are negative blood type. Obama was AB-, according to Time Magazine, the rarest type. But then you acted like you weren’t part of the bloodline so as to get to the next question, though you’ve admitted several times to being of the family and even how “they” tried to recruit you several times, supposedly failing. Let’s add this to the above fact that you were apparently recently approached by an “agent” to take money to quit your show and destroy your own reputation. You’ve got some ‘splaining to do, Jan.
  2. I cracked up laughing when I heard you contradict yourself as you so often do. But this time it was kinda special. First you got annoyed at a question about the over twenty books by Anatoli Fomenko, then told the questioner that before he critiques the book series he should first read them all. Yet later in the same hour you said you only have read the first book in the series, and part of the second. Two out of one hundred? Is that due diligence? Is that good research? Is that good grammar to form good logic to back up your rhetoric? LOL! Why is this fallacious? Because you are claiming complete and utter knowledge and unwavering support of Fomenko and other authored works on history and culture, even though you have admittedly not read the books. You went against your own words. You outed yourself! It was beautiful. What is the difference between criticizing that which you have not read and supporting that which you’ve not read? Which is worse? Where does all this confidence come from about false history, Fomenko, Tartary etc.? And how can I or anyone else trust that you’ve actually read the Bible, the Book of Mormon, the Quaran, or even Dr. Seuss since autumn of 2017? You certainly have no idea what the Bible’s message is, though you pretend to know by agreeing or disagreeing with what others say. And by the way, you can’t stand up in an actual Bible discussion worth a shit, either misusing or not knowing where to find the answers nor having any clue what it says. Let me quote you, because this is some funny shit! “You would need to, like, read his (Fomenkos’) 100 books on the subject, and, I think there’s 30 or so available in English… but so far, you know, ah, looking at the research myself, especially in the first 7 books, ah, it’s very, ah, solid, but again I’ve only read 2 of them or 1 and a half completely, but, ah, there’s a lot of good research in there but you’d have to study it for yourself and don’t take other people’s opinions, that would be the best way.” Is anybody actually listening to this? Are people just tuning in and tuning out? You just told people not to listen to you or your opinion, especially because you just admitted outright that you’ve only read at best 2 of Fomenko’s books out of 100, 30 of those that are actually in English. Yet you are an authority on the subject? WTF??? So everything you say is admittedly bullshit? You haven’t read his work, but you say with certainty that the dark ages were faked? Why, because you read most of the second book? This is nuts, man. Why are people giving you money? A fucking psych patient in a rubber room would be more entertaining… and have more experience to offer. Probably read more books too.
  3. For this one, I’ll just quote you word for word, keeping in mind the symptoms of narcissistic sociopathy as we progress: “Clearly there’s 100’s of you that have been targeting me for years now, and that’s a lot of money when you think about it for, you know, for one podcast host. I can’t even think of how many, you know, 10’s of thousands — even millions of dollars that would cost to pay all of you, to keep your B.S. going…” You also said they were “trying to shut down my website for 2 or 3 months.” Now, I can’t imagine it would take them 2 or 3 months of trying and then they just give up because, after all, you are the great and indefatigable Jan Irvin. I’m sure they and their combined forces of darkness are powerless against your computer and its Gnostic superpowers. Your computer must have a christ-complex, man. Logos! Or maybe the Trivium protected you? But let’s focus on what you just said here about all the agents, the trolls, and how they are being paid just to mess with you. You seriously believe that, don’t you, that you are so important to them and they that they waste tons of resources, manpower, time, and money on you and your little website? So did they hire all these people separate just for the act of “fucking with” you, or are they normal agents with nothing else to do? Is this virtual attack on Jan Irvin actually a planned event or just work to do in downtime, like busy work, like when they aren’t busy with dictators, international war criminals and thieves, and corporate and political espionage, they had a memo passed around that said when there is no work as planned and your feeling like pervin’, attack Gnostic Media and Mr. Jan Irvin. You see, there, it even rhymes. Boy are they clever. Waitresses clean salt and pepper shakers and fill catsup bottles in their down time, while CIA agents and paid trolls sabotage Jan Irvin in theirs? Or maybe you actually think you are their main concern? LOL! O, my dear Jan, when you look back at your life’s work and realize you’ve done nothing to harm them or they but relay to other people what is already publicly disclosed (declassified) information, and probably only what they don’t mind you relaying and maybe even hope that you will, perhaps then you will come down from your pedestal and quit pretending your shit don’t stink. I believe your statement above qualifies as paranoia of the spectrum infinitum. Actually I just made that up. It means endless, narcissistic, sociopathic paranoia with no boundaries in reality or rational thought. Hell, they apparently spend more on you and have more assets watching you than they do Jason Bourne, and he isn’t even real! You also said, “they (trolls) are definitely watching what we are doing. They don’t like what we’re doing here. That’s too bad. You know. Whatever…” Bravo! Bravo, Jan! Well spoken. It’s so clear now. Tolls don’t like us, especially you, so they watch us, especially you, according to the official troll code manual section 21.5.678, which only Jan Irvin has privileges to. FJEO = for Jan’s ego only. Jan, to be clear, people don’t attack you, you attack them, and then they block your email to try and tune you out. That’s what victims do.
  4. The best thing you’ve ever done for your body is to “drink buttered coffee?” LOL! There was a recently published, false peer-reviewed study that lied and said chocolate helps people lose weight. And so all the TV doctors parroted that study while their fans went out and got fat on the chocolate diet. It must be true if Jan Irvin says it, right? If it’s right for Jan, expect the one size fits all fallacy to follow.
  5. The Trivium was given (as a gift? apparently by Jan Irvin and Company) to the world to solve all the worlds problems? Seriously? You stated “We already released the Trivium…” as the answer to the question, how do we save the world? You said it as if you were Superman speaking casually about how he saved the world. You said it as if you are its inventor! Get over this Trivium worship dude! Because last time I checked, the Trivium ain’t altered shit, and that’s because the trivium isn’t a real thing. It’s a method, and one you use in a generally unscientific and unreasonable manner. It’s not a holy grail. It will not save the world, and neither will your rhetoric. The Trivium is not the Law of God, it is the law of Jan Irvin.
  6. You said all religions are based on “logos.” That’s hilarious. What are you, Captain Obvious now, or do you still not understand what the word Logos is defined as? Logos is the perception of what God is by men. So yes, that’s what all of the thousands of religions would be based on, of course. LOL! No wisdom shared there, as usual. How can you believe you are speaking with wisdom when you are merely pointing to the sky and calling it blue? Nice spin, again.
  7. There are no books missing from the Bible, Jan. If there are, then show me the original Bible that has those original books in it? Again, fallacious reasoning without the possibility of proof or source. Can’t prove a negative though, so again, well-played. Some “books” do exist. Granted. Those “books” are not in “the Bible.” Again, granted. Neither is “Mary Had A Little Lamb.” These are totally separate facts that you (and many others) insist are not separate. But to thus equate this to the statement that therefore the Bible is missing those books is like saying that because a walnut tree is not growing olives, the walnut tree is thus missing its olives. Obviously the walnut mafia must have coerced those helpless, unorganized olives to dismiss themselves from their original tree, with the help of the troll brute squad. Help me out here, Jan, which logical fallacy is this? This type of sophist conceptualization is the epitome of your circular rhetoric.
  8. According to the continuous, accusatory name-calling on this show, trolls are defined as: (1) anyone that asks a hard question, (2) anyone with “no activity” on their “account,” (3) “braindead,” and/or (4) people with “little dicks.” So apparently, only people like you, Jan, who by your own rhetoric here is implied therefore to have a bigger than average dick, can rise to the level of researcher and yet again narcissistic host of Gnostic Media. And since it sounds like you label as “trolls” most of your audience, I am thinking there are very few non-trolls actually listening by your logic, or just a lot of little-docked ones. So do you broadcast your show just for troll entertainment? Shouldn’t you then tell advertisers that the majority of your listeners are trolls, so they might not confuse your website traffic statistics with all the CIA-paid trolls with small dicks? Perhaps male enhancement pills would be a hot selling item on Gnostic Media? But then, if we all had penises or active brains or even lots of activity on our avatar accounts like Jan Irvin must apparently have based on this rhetoric, then we’d all instantly become as smart and Gnosticly-orientated as Jan himself. Then what? Who would you belittle then? Who would you compare your man-hood to if that happened? Oh, and by the way, by your logic, all trolls (conspirators) are also homosexuals. So anyone you’ve called an agent, CIA, troll, or dirty is thus by default a homosexual, since homosexuals are in your head somehow behind ALL conspiracies. So anyone that asks a hard question or registers an avatar so they can ask you a question is a homosexual (conspirator). LOL!
  9. Most open researchers and authors will state that there are no dumb questions, but you say there are lots of them in your forum. A dumb question is apparently one you don’t want to answer or think is beneath you. Perhaps only the gays ask dumb questions as part of their conspiratorial nature? What a narcissistic Dick. You addressed basically all questions as at the very best being beneath you, and yet still people paid for your asinine answers. Amazing. You are like the pied piper of predatory snake-oil salesmen.

I could do this all day… But alas, all things must come to an end.

If there is one life lesson you certainly haven’t learned yet Jan, it’s that you do not fuck with he that has nothing to lose. You’re little tirade against me worked only as long as I could stand to throw myself a perpetual pity party and act like such an abused, whiny little bitch. Whatever your goal, congratulations, I sure don’t have anyone beating down my door for an interview anymore. My books are sitting virtually still while I pay storage for them I can’t afford. Am I blaming you? No. I’m blaming myself for quitting my show because of your inconceivably confusing treatment of me – for allowing myself to become yet another of your victims. I’m not blaming you for anything here, I’m just liberating myself from your particular brand of batshit crazy. I’m taking my power back from you, not that I ever really lost it. I’m doing exactly what the victims of a narcissistic sociopathic should do, expunge my life of your influence and waiting without much hope for your sincere (if that’s possible) retraction and apology. Until then, let this open letter be a beacon to others to steer clear of the false light emanating from your Gnostic nonsense and abusive, narcissistic, sociopathic nature. And may your other victims have the courage to do the same, to stand up, to demand proofs, to demand apologies and retractions, and to take their own power back.

One thing I have recently begun to consider, which is a very frightening thought, is that a good many of alternative media hosts, shock jocks, and authors out there are just like you. But even worse than this is the notion that many of us start to emulate your nature and tone, your behavior, your narcissistic sociopathy, either to sell products or even just to fit in and be a accepted by peers that now almost expect this sociopathic behavior in their media and “news.” How do you compete with Alex jones, for example, the perfection of a narcissistic sociopath, without trying to outdo him? For if you oppose him or act at all sane in your delivery, his audience (strange network of supporters) is trained to use exactly the same fallacious rhetoric and labeling that Jan Irvin has perfected, without any form of proof, relying completely on heresy and social consent. Are the airwaves ruled by sociopaths? I can’t say this. But I can say that sociopathic behavior is being mirrored and performed by many out there, and seemingly has somehow become what people expect. People are at least pretending sociopathy to fit in to the alternative narrative, parroting each other as source without fact-checking. Of this phenomenon, we are all victims.

Jan, I’d like to impart to you a bit of knowledge, in the form of a parable of my own making. I realize that, in your mind, anyone who might happen to fart in your general direction is suspect of being a paid farter out to cause organized flatulence against you (that’s sarcasm, dick). But keep in mind, if I have to fart in an elevator and you happen to be in that elevator car when my body expresses the need to blow foul air, I’m going to fart — and it has nothing to do with you or your life or your information or your opinions or your website. Sometimes, Jan, a fart is just a fart. And sometimes, like in my case, a good man is just a good man, or is at least trying to learn and break free so as to be one.

And that brings us to the end. All eyes are on you, Jan. Will you do the right thing and retract your false, unprovable accusations against me and my father that you’ve never met nor even know his first name? Or will you openly attack me further with whatever fallacious things you can imagine in that crazy brain database of yours, so as to further obfuscate the fact that your original accusations were completely made up and without one line item of evidence? The choice, and I dare say your reputation, is on the line here, man.

Until then, we all wait with bated breath. Actually, that’s not true. I could give a shit what you do. I mean, really, no one should believe anything a sociopath does or says.

But then again, as expected, you’ve already put me in that brain database, haven’t you, with a line connecting me to Mark Passio? So, as your listeners complain that even though you’ve had thirty thousand times more contact with Mark Passio than I ever did or will, there is no line stringing Jan Irvin to any of these bad guys including Mark Passio, even though you’ve worked with and even called as friends a great many of those that you now call as CIA agents? That, Jan, is truly a sociopathic mentality. Remember, your silly strings connecting people in your brain program is not proof of anything but your own demented worldview. Use primary source for once in your fucking life.

One last thing… I forgive you, Jan, because that’s what my moral, scriptural, unwritten Law says self-evidently is the only way to peace, love, and happiness. This doesn’t mean I want anything further to do with you, though. This open letter was more like a good, bowel-relieving wet fart that helped me to let go of the unnecessary pressure caused by holding your bullshit in. But this should not be confused with the kind of fart mentioned above. No, this one was most certainly pointed right at your damned face.

I hereby forgive and banish you and your ilk from my life.

.

Clint > richard-son (Realitybloger.wordpress.com)
Friday, May 25th, 2018

 

 

Red Pill Sunday School: Special Guest: Kurtis Richard Kallenbach


–=–

Join me this Sunday for a special live discussion with Kurt Kallenbach. Check out some of his works, here: (http://www.kurtisrichardkallenbach.xyz/)

If you’ve missed some of my past shows, including my three part series on the True history of the United States (#12, 13, 14), please revisit my archives where all my guest appearances and regularly hosted shows are archived:

https://corporationnationradioarchives.wordpress.com

Past guests on Red Pill Sunday School have included Patrick Jordan and Daniel, catching up on our adventures in our Republic Broadcasting days. I plan on doing more live shows from here on in, as requested, so stay tuned to this archives site for future guest announcements.

Check out the other shows, new and old, from Bill Cooper to Alan Watt to Hal Anthony, at the UCY.TV station: http://ucy.tv

And please download my book for free at: http://www.strawmanstory.info

–=–

Thanks one and all for your generous gifts and especially your kind and supportive words to keep me going on this path, where so many stumbling blocks have been placed before us.

Until we meet on our paths in the Real, let us remain united and meek (spiritually prepared) together as we may in this strange realm of the digital simulacra…

.

–Clint>richardson (Realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Tuesday, January 9th, 2018 (Anno Domini)
–22 Tevet, 5778 (Anno Mundi)*

 

*Yes, Kurt and I will discuss these alternative timelines!!!