A Deconstruction Of The Death Of Christ: It’s Not What You Think


–=–

“But the natural (idiot/foolish) man receiveth not
the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him:
neither can he know [them], because they are spiritually discerned.”

–1 Corinthians 2:14

–=–

 

As a consummate Bible researcher nowadays, I am always looking for spiritual, reasonable explanations for the most unreasonable, ridiculous sounding of stories. There is, of course, a fine line between deciphering the absurd to find spiritual instruction and playing the fool. The king’s scribes were quite clever in their transliterations, leaving traps and pitfalls throughout the Crown’s copyrighted, English (dog-Latin) version. Some may take offense at the idea that I am calling the story of Christ’s death and resurrection as a somewhat ridiculous story, and to you otherwise reasonable people, I will simply offer to tell you why I say this over a glass of blood-turned wine along with Jonah inside the “whale’s” (translation sea monster’s) mouth aside a nice burning bush.

The ancient, well known, often utilized, and certainly well established Truth is that the more ridiculous an allegory or other moral story is portrayed, the more easily it is remembered. If you’ve ever bought one of those memory courses from a television infomercial as I did when I was a very young lad, you’ll find the same exact lesson on how ridiculousness supercharges the memory, complete with instructions on how to imagine the utmost ridiculous connections to different images in your head in order to remember a list of 100, or even 1,000 words. The stranger the image or description and correlation of those words in order, the more memorable that list becomes. Indeed, in trying to memorize cold a list of irrelevant words, I could not, my mind able to recite merely a few, out of order, and without coherent purpose. But when I applied the rules of ridiculousness, that is, when I followed the instructions and correlated the words as a continuous, absolutely absurd set of details in a story of my own imagination,  I was amazingly able to remember lists of 100 or more words, in order, by simply connecting each word as instructed. For example, if the first word is elephant and the second word is umbrella, I was instructed to imagine the most silly looking of elephants, complete with concerned expression and a polka-dotted leotard, that is holding an umbrella. And if the third word was then turtle, then I would imagine the elephant in the ridiculous leotard holding the umbrella up against falling turtles, themselves having something odd about them. If the forth word was water, then I would imagine the turtles doing an awesome 360 flip and while diving into the ocean, or if it were sunglasses, then of course the turtles would be sporting some shades. And so it went, word after totally unrelated word, placed by my mind into the most ridiculous of loosely linked, situational absurdities. And sure enough, as I pictured these things in my mind, I was able to spout off that list of words with hardly any effort at all, because who could resist that silly elephant holding an umbrella so as not to get hit by the falling turtles that were diving into the ocean with sunglasses, etc. etc.

When I consider all the True life stories I’ve heard over the years, as I am sure the reader would agree, again I find that I remember the most outlandish, ridiculous, or even most violent ones most often. I find myself telling stories about these events, and usually I do so because of their ridiculousness, their humor, or their horror. Comedians make whole stand-up routines based on such ridiculous stories, turning them into jokes that may or may not be true… but they sure are memorable. And of course we remember certain jokes because they are funny, and they are funny because they are absurd or even impossible in Nature. Perhaps they are embarrassing, or they remind us of something close to home or a personal experience. Whatever the case, we are wired to remember the most bizarre shit. We remember the harshness of violence, experiencing post traumatic stress, as another example. If I were to ask anyone where they were on 9/11/2001, they could probably tell me in detail, simply because what they really remember is a link between the out-of-place absurdity of watching the World Trade Centers burning and falling on television, because such an absurdity was in the background on every television screen, everywhere, making whatever one was doing that day stand out. In fact, when prompted to speak about that horrific event, many of us specifically reference whatever mundane task we were preforming and whatever usual place we were lingering. But if I were to ask anyone where they were three days before their 27th birthday, they most likely would have no clue. Why? No association. No correlation. No event to remember. No story to tell. Whatever stands out about the event, the story, the happenstance, and specifically the ridiculousness of the situation, the more memorable it is. It’s like a filter in the mind, where the details of what is considered as normal or routine are lost in the shuffle, but where learnable or unique moments shine through, teaching and preparing us for the future. After all, there’s a psychological reason why shock-jocks are so unwittingly popular and why news outlets have “breaking news” and cover certain stories for weeks at a time, 24 hours a day.

Entertainments are the same way. The more scary, the more ridiculous, the more fantastical, the more memorable they are. For how can one explain what does not exist, say in science fiction or fantasy, without a deep impression of that non-existent thing to the point of being able to picture it in ones mind? Yet most of us (I hope) can still distinguish between reality and fantasy. In other words, after seeing a fictional movie, we do not believe in those false, computer-enhanced images as what is actually real or as history. That would be Idolatry. And, I’m sorry and happy to say, religions are no exception to this rule.

Why are all the stories of the gods of all the cultures so ridiculous? Why are the gods tyrannical, manipulative monsters with multiple heads or some other superpower or supernatural attribute? From Zeus to the Babylonian creation story, these tales are physically, scientifically, and logically impossible to believe. Yet we remember them, don’t we? Many insist they are to be taken as literally True, as the Word of God, ironically and in idolatry assigning supernatural qualities to the God of Nature, while completely loosing the moral teaching intended through that ridiculousness. And I agree, they are the Word of God (Truth)… but only if you are taking them as the metaphor and moral story they are meant to be understood as. They are mythical because myth is memorable. All civilizations, all countries and nations, all religions, are built upon their own ridiculous myths about those that founded or formed them. Without the mythology of the founding fathers, there would be no purpose behind the United States, and certainly no reason to support what it has morphed into in modern times — a simulacra (a copy having nothing to do with its original) desperately promoting that patriot mythology as its reason for its post-modern existence. If Zeus was a librarian that had no authority, that shuffled books around all day without any other adventure or purpose, what could we possibly learn as his moral story? What would be memorable about his godliness?

The problem is that, while we remember the story, we often don’t remember or were never taught the point behind the ridiculous, impossible-to-be-True story. We are never told the moral lesson of the allegory. And so we take it literally, which in our minds causes the story to become historical “fact” instead of learning from the story (pretended history). We mistake facts with Truths. For instance, it is a fact that Han Solo and Chewbacca are ship-mates. But did you know it’s a fact that they are also lifelong friends? These are facts, in fiction. But they are not Truths. They are not the Word of God. There are many facts used to tell the story of the Law, that is, of the Word of God. Yet the Word (moral Law) is often lost behind belief in the facts, which aren’t Truths, only tools to cause Truth to shine. And often those facts are ridiculous, causing memory association. But as the Bible quote above suggests, the fool may not discern spiritual Truths because the fool is too busy trying to prove or disprove the facts, trying to prove the history instead of learning from it. It is foolish to believe that the purpose of the stories (mythos) of any history is to establish fact. Only the elite do this, and only to prove their power positions over the common people. These historical facts are institutional lies that justify completely unjustifiable rulers, which would have no purpose or reason behind their otherwise totally illegitimate rule if it weren’t for the established, embellished, generally bullshit historical fact they force us to learn in their public schools and institutions. And the only reason we fall for these so-called histories is because we forget their purpose their reason, their intention. We take them as literal instead of make-believe. We allow the most ridiculous events, like 9-11, to be used as historical facts in their justification for completely immoral, illegitimate, tyrannical laws to be passed against us. And we consider those laws somehow as truths instead of the prima facie (on their face) facts they actually are. We consider what is totally avoidable as that which is unavoidable, simply because we are tricked by their supposed factual history of inventions instead of learning from them. We don’t emulate the founding fathers in their dissent from the king, we treat them as gods, as the reason why their great grandchildren continue to rule the illegitimate United States corporation, which didn’t even exist until after those founding fathers (gods) were dead. In other words, prima facie means that these legal terms and laws are all facts as long as nobody questions their legitimacy, which is the description of every government. Corrupt men that seek power all have this trait in common — they turn the moral lessons meant to be learned by the retelling of history into the evidence of why they should be rulers. They turn myth into fact, and force it to be labeled and considered by fools as Truth.

Judging by the amount of narcissism taking place nowadays, I’d say the point of the story of Narcissus has been lost, for example. Perhaps they’ll name a cell phone camera model or selfie app after that unfortunate character of mythology? Or perhaps the story of the modern Narcissist must be rewritten to reflect the idiotic “accidents” taking place so often, as people walk off of cliffs while filming themselves doing so, even as they fall to their death on the craggy rocks below. Perhaps the myth of the Lemmings may need to be rewritten for these post-modern times, where those cute, cuddly creatures walk off the cliff with cell phones in their paws?

We may watch and enjoy movies like Clash of the Titans or Lord of the Rings without coming away from the story with its actual purpose for being told — the moral lesson. Unfortunately, the story of Jesus Christ and his death and resurrection are no different. When taken literally, as a purely historical event, the point of christ’s death is completely lost. It serves no purpose. It becomes an excuse instead of a cause. The moral takeaway and lesson of the life and death of Christ today for most “Christians” is just about as dead as that of the Greek gods.

In this study, I’d like to show you the exact place in the Bible where the spiritual, moral reason behind this story of Christ is explained. But first we have to understand what was the Babylonian, Mosaic tradition of animal and human sacrifice before the Christ (New Law) became the metaphoric, spiritual replacement for the literal sacrificial lamb.

PASCHAL – adjective – [Latin pascha.] Pertaining to the passover, or to Easter. (–Webster’s Dictionary of the English language, 1828)

PASSOVER – noun – [pass and over.] A feast of the Jews, instituted to commemorate the providential escape of the Hebrews, in Egypt, when God smiting the first-born of the Egyptians, passed over the houses of the Israelites, which were marked with the blood of the paschal lamb. 1. The sacrifice offered at the feast of the passover. (–Webster’s Dictionary of the English language, 1828)

EASTER – noun – A festival of the christian church observed in commemoration of our Savior’s resurrection. It answers to the pascha or passover of the Hebrews, and most nations still give it this name, pascha, pask, paque. (–Webster’s Dictionary of the English language, 1828)

–=–

Think these are the same holidays? Have you been told that Easter and Passover are similar in their celebrative purpose? It’s a lie. Don’t believe it. The story of Easter is designed to replace the Babylonian (i.e. Jewish) story of Passover just as the New Testament is meant to replace the Old. In other words, the sacrifice of the “Son of God” is designed to replace the sacrifice of animals to the Babylonian gods. The New Testament is designed not to eliminate but to fulfill the Old.

–=–

“Ever since the New Testament, the paschal lamb has been interpreted as prefiguring Jesus. In subsequent centuries, Church Fathers and later clergy taught that Jesus was the lamb of God, the new Passover sacrificeThe Christian who is quoted or paraphrased in Sefer Nitztzahon Yashan makes the curious argument: the difficulty of offering any rational reason for the details of the paschal sacrifice in Exodus 12 provesthat the text requires an allegorical explanation, and it must be an allegory about Jesus. This seems to have led Jews to work harder to prove that, on the literal level, the rules were meaningful, not arbitrary… Modern biblical scholars also struggle with the meaning of the ritual and the significance of these details, typically using anthropological tools to understand it, and suggesting that most of these rituals did not originate with a historical first Passover… Such is the nature of allegorical explanations. Christians claimed that the allegory was about Jesus, but there was nothing to stop another allegorist from giving a totally different explanation, in this case, that it was about the Jewish people as a whole.”

–Prof. Rabbi Martin Lockshin, excerpted from ‘Searching for the Meaning of the Passover Sacrifice, The need for medieval exegetes to suggest a plausible alternative to the Christian exegesis of this ritual’

–=–

The problem? Here we have an allegory trying desperately to be proven as a history. Happens all the time. Again, the fool completely misses the spiritual lesson, because to the fool, the spiritual lesson is foolishness, and the spiritual coldness and irrelevance of history and scientific proofs are paramount.

Now, before you get all bent out of shape because of some pseudo-religious belief that the modern conceptualization of “science” as the new, replacement-for-Christ savior of men is the holy grail of the atheist (fool) and the logician, hold your horses just a moment and think about what I’m saying here. Because this question is a very reasonable one that can easily and even scientifically be answered: can science be applied to the Bible? In other words, can science discern the moral value and intent from an allegorical story or mythological history? Can science be used to prove or disprove an allegory, a metaphor, an aphorism, a moral equivalent, or a mythology? Of course it can’t. What a fool one must be to attempt to apply science to a book of moral stories and inherent Laws intended as that which is not even in the realm of scientific observation! Shall we use science to examine whether or not Little Miss Muffet truly sat on a Tuffet, searching desperately through historical ruins to prove said tuffet and the girl that sat on it actually existed? Shall we merely take at its word the story of Mary and her supposedly little lamb and that its fleece was apparently white as snow? Was Wilber really “Some Pig” as Charlotte the Black Widow claims him to be, or was he just another side of bacon waiting to happen? You must understand that this is not a pro- or anti- science argument, but rather just a case where science isn’t even part of the topic. It simply isn’t necessary or relevant to the purpose and intent of the Bible as a moral teaching tool to invoke scientific methods. Spirituality and moral behavior is not a scientific subject. And it’s utterly ridiculous to attempt to try and prove or disprove the Bible’s allegorical, metaphorical nature with the tools of science. Perhaps the fact that this idea is so ridiculous is why it has caught on with such fervor among non-thinking fools. Yet one must ask such a purveyor of scientific proofs for allegorical stories this question: which is more ridiculous and unscientific, the Bible stories themselves, or trying to prove or disprove those moral stories with science? LOL! Why would anyone attempt to bring science into a moral discussion? Unless, perhaps, one wishes to purposefully confuse the very intent and purpose of the Bible’s allegorical mythos and moral lessons with some “factual” or “scientifically provable” history (an oxymoron) that never actually happened so as to justify whatever it is they call themselves… kings, priests, popes, magistrates, judges, jews, Christians, or just good old false gods?

The moral of this story is that morals cannot be proven by science. They are not of the same realm. That is to say that spiritual thought and action are not and cannot be scientifically justified. Inversely, there is no spirituality in science, for True science seeks only to understand Nature Itself, not decipher its spiritual meaning. Attempting to apply science to the Bible is like applying spiritual morals to a spiritless machine. It just doesn’t work. Yet, it certainly works to confuse and confound most people from understanding the Bible. In that way, science may very well, in the end, triumph over the minds of men and destroy our collective spirit.

You see, If the bible can be made into an artificially “factual” history (fact) instead of an allegory (moral Truth) in the minds of Christians… oh, wait, that’s already happened. That’s the purpose of legal corporations that in their corporate charters call themselves by differing, anti-Biblical, empty, denominational religious names. And each one has a history of its own. The Methodists have their founding father, John Wesley. The Catholics have their replacement (anti) God and vicar of christ, the Pope. The 7th Day Adventists have their very recent history of Ellen White and John Nevins Andrews, their own founding fathers. The Baptists founding father in Amsterdam was John Smyth, with John Clark or Roger Williams in America. Mormons have their bizarre history and replacement Christ in Joseph Smith, while scientology was apparently invented by L. Ron Hubbard, a science fiction author, after he made a bet between fellow high profile sci-fi writers over a poker game that Hubbard could not start a new, successful religion of his own. All religions have their histories, that is, their “facts” that are used to justify their own false, corporate doctrines. Nevermind the repeated warnings of the Bible that we should call no man as “father” nor take any other doctrine (law) but that of the Bible.

And that brings us back to the allegory of the passover…

Let us be clear that this so-called Jewish holiday, that of the celebration of the “pass-over” or paschal (lamb) sacrifice, was not the physical, literal killing or slaughtering of all the first born human sons and animals. That’s too ridiculous even for the Bible. But the consideration of it, that of the killing of children, was a powerful metaphorical conception that certainly did represent the taking away of the right of what is called primogeniture. This concept of law is not a physical attribute but a status, otherwise known in law as being the firstborn. And so we can quite fully understand the purpose of this allegory of the passover by simply understanding manmade law of the time, and therefore the purpose of putting to metaphoric death that spiritual status, that is, a right of succession.

PRIMOGENETUREnoun – 1. The state of being the firstborn child‘Maui and Tahaki are famous mythological heroes in Polynesia and they have more powerful manas than their elder brothers, though they are not the primogenitures.’ After the sin the primogenitures lost their privilege of serving in the Holy Temple and it was given to the Levites, who had abstained from the sin.’ 1.1 The right of succession belonging to the firstborn child, especially the feudal rule by which the whole real estate of an intestate passed to the eldest son(–Oxford Lexico.com Dictionary online)

PRIMOGENETURE – A historical term that refers to the rights and responsibilities of the first-born child among siblings in a family. When used in the legal sense, the term is used to discuss the right of the eldest son in the family to inherit his parents’ estate upon their death. The initial purpose of determining primogeniture was to keep an estate from being divided among siblings. When this was done, a parcel of land would continue to get smaller and smaller, which reduced the value of the overall property. To explore this concept, consider the following primogeniture definition.”

PRIMOGENETURE – (noun) – The state of being the firstborn child in the family. The system of inheritance or succession of the firstborn child, especially the eldest son

PRIMOGENETURE LAW – Primogeniture law historically determined that the first-born son among all of a couple’s children would inherit his parents’ entire estate upon their deaths. The purpose of this was so that the parcel of land would not end up being so subdivided that the value of each individual parcel would plummet. The term “primogeniture” was implied to refer to male children. If there were no male heirs, then primogeniture law determined that the property would be divided up among the daughters in equal shares. Primogeniture law actually hails from feudal England, and does not exist in the United States. (–Legal dictionary online, at https://legaldictionary.net)

–=–

Perhaps it slipped your mind that there happened to be no female children smitten by God (Jehovah) on that day of passover? Now, allegorically and legally, you know why. They simply were not male, and so not considered by law as “firstborn” and therefore had no right of primogeniture to put to figurative death. Disclaimer: No female children were harmed during the making of this allegory. This is what you might call as a big tell…

–=–

“And it came to pass, that at midnight the LORD (Jehovah) smote all the firstborn in the land of Egypt, from the firstborn of Pharaoh that sat on his throne unto the firstborn of the captive that was in the dungeon; and all the firstborn of cattle.” (–Exodus 12:29, KJB).
–=–

Only the “firstborn” (primogeniture) were “smote” by Jehovah. In other words, the right of succession to God’s Kingdom was allegorically usurped. This, by law and custom, and therefore by default, necessarily did not include any female children, which were never considered as firstborn. Again, it was the status of inheritable blood that was made figuratively dead, not the actual life of the child. Yet the blood-right remained (was saved) with the children of the Israelites, who escaped the “destroyer” of the “firstborn,” this word destroyer being a translation of the word shachath, which specifically means “moral corruption, rot, ruin, spoliation, perversion, or to be marred or marked (by evil/immorality).”” Yes, the destroyer (of spirituality and Truth) put to death all the “firstborn” male children (heirs), but this was a figurative, spiritual death, not a literal, physical one.

It is also very important not to confuse the “Jews” with the Israelites. These terms are not the same. The Israelites were men that followed the Law of God, that is, the Christ (Logos) as Law. The Jews (יְהוּדִי – Yĕhuwdiy; or Ἰουδαῖος, Ioudaios), were specifically defined as:

“The apostle John, inasmuch as agreeably to the state of things in his day he looked upon the Jews as a body of men hostile to Christianity, with whom he had come to see that both he and all true Christians had nothing in common as respects religious matters, even in his record of the life of Jesus not only himself makes a distinction between the Jews and Jesus, but ascribes to Jesus and his apostles language in which they distinguish themselves from the Jews, as though the latter sprang from an alien race: John 11:8; John 13:33. And those who (not only at Jerusalem, but also in Galilee, cf. John 6:41, 52) opposed his divine Master and his Master’s causeespecially the rulers, priests, members of the Sanhedrin, Pharisees — he does not hesitate to style οἱ Ἰουδαῖοι, since the hatred of these leaders exhibits the hatred of the whole nation toward Jesus: John 1:19; John 2:18, 20; John 5:10, 15ff,John 5:18; John 6:41,52; 7:1,11,13; 9:18,22; 10:24,31,33; 18:14.” (–Strong’s Concordance #G2453 entry, quoting THAYER’S GREEK LEXICON)

–=–

Hmm… sounds a lot like secular Israel and the worldwide, mostly atheistic jews (Ἰουδαῖοιof today, despite their masterful infiltration and blinding of Christian churches throughout the world.

Oh, but surely Christians and Jews can live together in harmony under the same Law, right? A Christian-Jewish Alliance? Forget the Bible, you’re racist if you don’t think so. That’s scientifically proven by the propaganda arm of the ADL!

As the Exodus story explains, it was the status of being firstborn (primogeniture), a legally recognized and spiritually induced (blood-right) status, that was in title only taken away from the Egyptians, including even Pharaoh’s own firstborn son (heir), whereas the firstborn of the Israelites (not jews) had their God-given rights preserved. God (Jehovah) figuratively passed over them in his taking away of the right of inheritance to God’s Kingdom, for they were not followers of the Law of Nature (God), that is, they did not respect the metaphoric lamb of God (Jesus Christ/Logos). But to understand this story the metaphor must be applied. Remember, this is not Clint’s opinion, this is defined straight out of the concordances and lexicons for the Bible. And this is just one of many hundreds of examples of the term death being used figuratively, meaning spiritual death, and signifying a loss of inheritance and access to God’s Law to defeat man’s.

All in all, the event is not even a religious one. In other words, it has nothing to do with religion, but is strictly an allegorical understanding of the law of inheritance and status as it applies to the Law of Nature (Christ).

The Egyptians and the Jews were, of course, idolators. They worshiped the false (untrue, unnatural), Babylonian gods. In other words, they did not worship and obey Truth (Nature) and Its Law. And so their horrific sacrifices were also made to idols (false gods).

Idol – Strong’s #G1497 – eidōlon

εἴδωλον, εἰδώλου, τό (εἶδος (cf. Winers Grammar, 96 (91); Etym. Magn. 296, 9)), in Greek writings from Homer down, an image, likeness, i. e. whatever represents the form of an object, either real or imaginary; used of the shades of the departed (in Homer), of apparitions, spectres, phantoms of the mind, etc.; in Biblical writings (an idol, i. e.):

1. the image of a heathen god: Acts 7:41; 1 Corinthians 12:2; Revelation 9:20 (Isaiah 30:22; 2 Chronicles 23:17, etc.; θεῶν ἤ δαιμον´ων εἴδωλα, Polybius 31, 3, 13);

2. a false god: Acts 15:20 (on which see ἀλίσγημα); Romans 2:22; 1 Corinthians 8:4, 7; 1 Corinthians 10:19; 2 Corinthians 6:16; 1 Thessalonians 1:9 (often in the Sept.); φυλάσσειν ἑαυτόν ἀπό τῶν εἰδώλων, to guard oneself from all manner of fellowship with heathen worship, (1 John 5:21).

–=–

Take the partaking (artificial sacrifice) of those little, corporately mass-produced, shitty-tasting little wafers and processed (unnatural), corporately manufactured grape (artificial) juice in church as a pretended “flesh” eating and “blood” drinking. What ever might the Bible say about that?

–=–

As concerning therefore the eating of those things that are offered in sacrifice unto idols, we know that an idol (G1497is nothing in the world, and that there is none other God but one… Howbeit there is not in every man that knowledge: for some with conscience of the idol (G1497) unto this hour eat it as a thing offered unto an idol; and their conscience being weak is defiled.”

—1 Corinthians 8: 4,7, KJB

–=–

“And were all baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea; And did all eat the same spiritual meat; And did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock was Christ.

—1 Corinthians 10: 2-4

–=–

Be not carried about with divers and strange doctrines. For it is a good thing that the heart be established with grace; not with meats, which have not profited them that have been occupied therein.”

—Hebrews 13: 9, KJB

–=–

Not only does the New Law of God (Christ) state not to worship or sacrifice idols, it also tells you that your meats should be spiritual, not worldly. And, of course, we find here one of many warnings not to follow strange doctrines, which basically is a reference to all modern, so-called “Christian” religions (worldly, secular corporations) and their useless, worldly ceremonies and rituals. The Bible is clear never to worship God in any of man’s false traditions, or in other words, never worship or pray to God through any artificial (manmade) invention.

Astoundingly, due to the stark ignorance of today’s populations in all nations, the planned reinvention and construction of the idol of the “Third Temple” reinvoking the Old, Babylonian law is under way. Here we find again blatant, and in my opinion purposeful, willful ignorance of the metaphoric, allegoric nature of the Biblical stories of the first two temples therein. This third temple can, according to the Bible, only stand and represent idolatry at its worst. Over and over we read that God’s Kingdom is not found in anything built by the hands of men. God’s Realm is Creation, not the resourced recreation of men. Therefore, any temple or other corporate church building is an idol, and every religion is necessarily a false, reinvented doctrine designed and incorporated (made legal under man’s false law) to misalign and replace God’s Law (doctrine) as told in Biblical allegory. The True Christian has no religion but that of unwaveringly following the example of Jesus Christ without artifice, s the personification of Logos (the Law of the Universe). And that just doesn’t include anything built by the hands (or minds) of men. For the Law of Nature, the Law of God, is self-Evident, self-Existent, as all of Nature and the Universe is, not an invention of man.

But in modern, Zionist-Jewish thought, from one Rabbi HaRav Avraham Yitzchak HaCohen Kook, the First Ashkenazi Chief Rabbi of Israel, revered and famed Torah sage, philosopher, writer, poet, iconic and beloved leader of religious Zionism and the return to Zion (1865-1935), is as expected completely foreign and opposed to Christ (God’s Law of Nature), using logical fallacy to promote pointless animal slaughter as idol sacrifice:

Will There be Sacrifices in the Third Temple?

Rav Kook’s views on the Temple service are sometimes misconstrued. A superficial reading of a passage in Olat Re’iyah (vol. I, p. 292) indicates that only grain offerings will be offered in the reinstated Temple service. To properly understand Rav Kook’s approach, it is necessary to read a related essay from Otzarot HaRe’iyah.]

What will the rebuilt Temple be like? Will we really offer animal sacrifices once again?

Protecting Animals

Some people object to the idea of sacrifices out of concern for the welfare of animals. However, this objection contains a measure of hypocrisy. Why should compassion for animals only be expressed with regard to humanity’s spiritual needs? If our opposition to animal slaughter is based not on weakness of character, but on recognition of the issue’s fundamental morality, then our first step should be to outlaw the killing of animals for food, clothing, and other material benefits.

In the world’s present state, the human race is weak, both physically and morally. The hour to protect animal life has not yet arrived. We still need to slaughter animals for our physical needs, and human morality requires that we maintain clear boundaries to distinguish between the relative value of human and animal life.

At this point in time, to advocate the protection of animals in our service of God is disingenuous. Is it moral to permit cruelty towards animals for our physical needs, yet forbid their use for our spiritual service, in sincere recognition and gratitude for God’s kindness? If our dedication and love for God can be expressed – at its highest level – with our willingness to surrender our own lives and die al kiddush Hashem, sanctifying God’s name, then certainly we should be willing to forgo the life of animals for this sublime goal…

Hints to the Future

Even in the current reality, we may feel uncomfortable about killing animals. This does not mean that the time for full animal rights has already arrived. Rather, these feelings come from a hidden anticipation of the future that is already ingrained in our souls, like many other spiritual aspirations.

Hints of these future changes may be found in the text of the Torah itself. Thus, it says that offerings are slaughtered on the northern side of the altar. Why this side? The north traditionally represents that which is incomplete and lacking, as it is written, “Out of the north, the evil shall break forth” (Jeremiah 1:14). In other words, the need to slaughter animals is a temporary concession to life in an incomplete world.

Furthermore, the Torah stipulates that sacrifices must be slaughtered “lirtzonchem” – “willingly”(Lev. 19:5). The Temple service must correspond to our needs and wants. As the Talmud in Erchin21a explains, one must be able to say, “I want to bring this offering.” When the slaughter of animals is no longer generally acceptable to society, this condition will not be fulfilled.

Finally, the Torah describes a person offering an animal sacrifice as “adam” (Lev. 1:2). This word indicates our current state of moral decline, a result of the unresolved sin of Adam, the first man. An individual offering a grain offering, on the other hand, is called “nefesh,” or “soul” (Lev. 2:1). The word nefesh implies a deeper, more essential level of humanity, independent of any temporary failings.

(Excerpt from: Arutz Sheva 7, IsraelNationalNews.com – quoting from Gold from the Land of Israel pp. 173-176. Adapted from Otzarot HaRe’iyah, vol. II, pp. 101-103; Olat Re’iyah vol. I, p. 292, sent to Arutz Sheva by Rabbi Chanan Morrison, RavKookTorah.org)

–=–

Read that again, would ya?

This blatant, temple-based return to the idolatry of the Babylonian, Mosaic Old Law should be a frightening nightmare to any moral man, yet we find the entirety of the so-called “Christian” religions brainwashed to be in praise and service to this Biblically defined, anti-Christ brood. This is the ultimate in antichrist rhetoric and action. This is literally the undoing of the allegory and purpose of the Christ story. This is the killing of Jesus Christ, in other words, the destruction of the New Testament Law (Law of Nature) and the reinstatement of the Old, secular Babylonian law. To be antichrist is to be against God’s Law, the New Testament, as exemplified by the allegory (example) of Christ. This is the very definition of the biblical word Jew, as we read above. It’s what all Christians should expect from Jews, again, as defined in the Bible. It’s their reason for existence, to defeat what they call openly as the false savior, Jesus Christ (New Law). This has nothing to do with race, or opinion, and everything to do with moral, spiritual consciousness toward Jehovah (Nature), that is, God’s Creation and Its Law.

And so we come, in the Bible, to where the reasoning behind this turning point from the law of men under Babylon and its false gods to the Law of Nature is explained, as the emergence of the New Law (Testament) based on the allegory of Jesus Christ. The purpose behind the Christ allegory, that is, the personification (story) of Jesus Christ as a man following the Law of Nature (Jehovah), was quite eloquently authored to replace the Babylonian hell of these idolators and their bloody, sacrificial rituals to false gods. This was made quite clear in the 9th chapter of Hebrews:

Heb 9:1 – Then verily the first covenant had also ordinances of divine service, and a worldly sanctuary.

Heb 9:2 – For there was a tabernacle made; the first, wherein was the candlestick, and the table, and the shewbread; which is called the sanctuary.

Heb 9:3 – And after the second veil, the tabernacle which is called the Holiest of all; (Author’s note: see here that a building made by the hands of men is called the Holiest of all instead of that which is God or a Creation of God’s Nature. In other words, these temples were sanctuaries against Jehovah/Nature, not in support of It.)

Heb 9:4 – Which had the golden censer, and the ark of the covenant overlaid round about with gold, wherein was the golden pot that had manna, and Aaron’s rod that budded, and the tables of the covenant;

Heb 9:5 – And over it the cherubims of glory shadowing the mercy seat; of which we cannot now speak particularly.

Heb 9:6 – Now when these things were thus ordained, the priests went always into the first tabernacle, accomplishing the service of God.

Heb 9:7 – But into the second went the high priest alone once every year, not without blood, which he offered for himself, and for the errors of the people:

Heb 9:8 – The Holy Ghost this signifying, that the way into the holiest of all was not yet made manifest, while as the first tabernacle was yet standing:

Heb 9:9 – Which was a figure (idol) for the time then present, in which were offered both gifts and sacrifices, that could not make him that did the service perfect, as pertaining to the conscience;

Heb 9:10 – Which stood only in meats and drinks, and divers washings, and carnal ordinances, imposed on them until the time of reformation.

Heb 9:11 – But Christ being come an high priest of good things to come, by a greater and more perfect tabernacle, not made with hands, that is to say, not of this building (idol);

Heb 9:12 – Neither by the blood of goats and calves, but by his own blood he entered in once into the holy place, having obtained eternal redemption for us.

Heb 9:13 – For if the blood of bulls and of goats, and the ashes of an heifer sprinkling the unclean, sanctifieth to the purifying of the flesh:

Heb 9:14 – How much more shall the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself without spot to God, purge your conscience from dead works to serve the living God?

Heb 9:15 – And for this cause he is the mediator of the new testament, that by means of death, for the redemption of the transgressions that were under the first testament, they which are called might receive the promise of eternal inheritance.

Heb 9:16 – For where a testament is, there must also of necessity be the death of the testator.

Heb 9:17 – For a testament is of force after men are dead: otherwise it is of no strength at all while the testator liveth.

Heb 9:18 – Whereupon neither the first testament was dedicated without blood.

Heb 9:19 – For when Moses had spoken every precept to all the people according to the law, he took the blood of calves and of goats, with water, and scarlet wool, and hyssop, and sprinkled both the book, and all the people,

Heb 9:20 – Saying, This is the blood of the testament which God hath enjoined unto you.

Heb 9:21 – Moreover he sprinkled with blood both the tabernacle, and all the vessels of the ministry.

Heb 9:22 – And almost all things are by the law purged with blood; and without shedding of blood is no remission.

Heb 9:23 – It was therefore necessary that the patterns of things in the heavens should be purified with these; but the heavenly things themselves with better sacrifices than these.

Heb 9:24 – For Christ is not entered into the holy places made with hands, which are the figures (idols) of the true; but into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of God for us:

Heb 9:25 – Nor yet that he should offer himself often, as the high priest entereth into the holy place every year with blood of others;

Heb 9:26 – For then must he often have suffered since the foundation of the world: but now once in the end of the world hath he appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself.

Heb 9:27 – And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment:

Heb 9:28 – So Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many; and unto them that look for him shall he appear the second time without sin unto salvation.

–=–

The point? Worshiping God through idols was ceased, where Jesus Christ (personification and example of Logos) replaced those idols. We are called in the New Testament not to worship Jesus Christ as God or as an idol, but to become Christlike in our actions under Gods Law so as to worship Jehovah. Instead of sacrificing idols to God, we are to be the sacrifice ourselves, sacrificing (crucifying) all worldly things so as to live spiritually, in the Realm of God’s Nature and under Its Law. We are to become the sons of God by following the example. In this way, the sacrifice is Real, not made in idolatry, or in other words, we act on and under the Law of God (Nature) instead of just using idols as an excuse not to follow that Law. In essence, what this is saying is that a man cannot make his sins disappear in some mock, ceremonial atonement, by killing , mutilating, and bleeding dry some poor defenseless animal that is part of God’s Creation, for this pointless, purposeless murder of an innocent beast is certainly a sin in and of itself. It makes about as much sense as hunting elephants and giraffes for sport. You cannot cleanse your own blood of its sin by taking that of another, completely innocent beast. No, it is you that must stop acting like a beast, sacrificing from your spiritual Life that which is of the world of the flesh, the world of men (i.e. secularism, legalism). Instead of slaying innocent beasts as the Babylonian false gods demanded, man must follow the example of Christ (the Law of Nature personified) in order to rectify ones own sin — to be reborn from the realm of man’s law into the realm of God’s Law, in order to go back to Nature (God). In other words, this means that the legal person, the respect of fiction and the law that governs fiction, the lies, must die (metaphorically), so that the spiritual man may emerge without legal ties (false law) that prevent a man from acting under God’s Law. One cannot be saved from the trappings of false religion and worldly afflictions through useless killing in idolatry. It is our blood that must be spiritually purified. Thus, the Christ allegory is a guidepost allowing all men to return from the Babylonian woe, from Jewish (antichrist) influence, back to the very Nature we are born originally into. We that shed what the Bible refers to as sin can only do so by following the Law of Nature (Logos). For sin is just a general term meaning artifice, lies, fictions, idolatry, and self-deceit. SYN. That which is synthetic, not of Nature, not of God’s Realm or under Its’ Law.

So let’s put these pieces together here…

The Bible Law (i.e. common law of blood-right) says that in order for a testament to be valid, its testator (author) must be dead. No death, no inheritance. So one must ask oneself, how does an undying, “Living God” (Jehovah), defined as the entirety of Existence, the Universe and Nature Itself in Supreme Being (the verb Being, as Existence Itself), construct such a testament and still remain the eternal, never-ending, Living God? Here we may better understand the purpose behind the allegory of the Son (testator) of God, or He that was allegorically sent to die for our sins, in order that the New Testament (New Law of God) might be left to all men through death, a requirement of the law of the testator. This is figuratively the exact story played out in the maxims of law. In other words, this is an allegorical representation of what all men must suffer; namely, to be reborn from civil (legal) death in exchange for spiritual (True) Life under God, under the Law of Nature (Jehovah), personified in the story (allegory) of Christ. And yet it is so clearly written here that this True Life of substance without idolatry and empty sacrifice cannot be attained by merely participating in religious ceremonies and false sacrificial “communions” of eating meats (defined scripturally as any foodstuffs, literal or figurative) to false idols. This ceremonial custom of animal sacrifice, in fact, is surprisingly, completely against scripture, as we can read above. Just as you can’t squeeze blood from a turnip, as the saying goes, you certainly cannot squeeze the spiritual (figurative) blood of christ (atonement/forgiveness of sins) out of a communion wafer or other idol, and especially not from one of God’s own innocent Creatures. And no, grape juice is not a substitute for the works of, in, and under the blood of christ (Logos – God’s Law personified).

While the current false doctrines of corporate, religious gobbledygook and the ceremonial nonsense it promotes is enough to drive men away from such spiritually sound principles as the notion of the True meaning and intent behind the “blood of christ” and the reason for this story of the ultimate sacrifice by God — that a testament necessarily means the death of its testator — we may understand that the never-ending, never-changing God (Jehovah) cannot die lest we all figuratively die with It, waking up to our True, spiritual Nature. Therefore, the Son of God must be sacrificed, so that the Law (Will) of God may be testified and transferred to us. But in order to inherit this set of principles, we must become the sons of God ourselves. Jesus Christ is our example of how to do this, by following the Law of God. As Its sons, we become the spiritual, figurative primogeniture of God’s Kingdom (Nature). If you try and take this as literal, you will never understand It nor find yourself in It. You must reach deep down and find what is lost, that is, the ability to Love and cherish such moral stories and allegories for what they are intended to give you, learning from them as intended, and then acting accordingly. Poetry is, it turns out, for Real men. In other words, man may now Live Truly under this New Testament of Law, by the Will of Jehovah, by following in the sacrificial (metaphoric) blood of christ as a brotherhood of God’s sons. And what is so beautiful about this concept is that it literally requires nothing. No thing. No persons, places, or things (nouns/names). It is the negative Law, the Law of Truth, and Truth has no name (noun). It is the realm of God, of Nature, of that which is unblemished by the names and titles and defects and marks and fictional rights of man’s law and custom. He that is of God is the lesser part of God. Yet he who falls from such Grace is still of the Greater Good (God), the Higher Whole, but is tricked into allowing (consenting) that which is lesser in Law to overtake him. For the Greater always contains the lesser, just as the principal always contains the agent, the truster the trustee, the employer the employee, and so on. Hierarchically speaking, the power and Glory and Grace of that which is of Jehovah never loses its power or its Law, for the Law of Nature reigns supreme at all times, knowing that without it no Existence of any kind, Real or artificial, would Exist, as all self-Existence is literally Jehovah defined. All other forms of so-called “existence” are artificial, or that which is a re-creation of man. Thus, the foundational, scripture-based maxims of law spell out and follow exactly what one would expect.

But there is a problem. For the scriptures, after so much shared wisdom and warning with regards to the trickery of men and the simple instructions given from the perspective of being in Grace in recognizing everything that is false and of the father of lies (i.e. the re-creations of man influenced by devilish, adversarial intentions), also give us the free will to go against the Will of God, to break the Law and Covenant. The willing fool has no place in God’s Realm and has no access to God’s Law. He that should worship and express joy by the deceits and trickery of the lies of mans’ artifice, enjoining himself to that which is below him in persona (mask) and flattering title (idol), shall then be under the law of that which is lower than him, representing spiritual death, as the inability to govern ones own actions under God’s Law. So says the Bible — and thus the foundational maxims of law agree.

Many of the Highest maxims of law are simply constructs stripped from the Bible. This should be of no surprise when one understands that the Bible (as the unwritten, moral Law) is the foundation of the common law, and that, therefore, the unwritten was copied unto the written (Roman) law for the purposes of opposition. In other words, the unwritten, moral law must be recognized in order for the written, immoral law to have purpose, otherwise there is no reason for man’s law. Without recognition of Christ (God’s Law/Logos) there is no need or use for anything anti-christ. There is no left without right, no up without down, no light without darkness, no evil without good. To understand this, one must understand that God’s Law is neutral, whereas the Law of Rome is strict and sanctioned (punishable). By neutrality I mean that God’s Law is the Law of Nature, as is an inevitable Act of God, meaning the Act had nothing to do with man’s designs, inventions, or interference. It just Is. It Exists with or without man’s presence. A lightening strike causing a fire is an Act of God. It is a neutral event in Nature, and only a fool would believe it to be targeted at anything or sent for the purposes of some man’s judgement. What arrogance, conceit, and outright idiocy must it take for any man to believe that the power of the Universe (God) can or should be directed at any other man, or upon oneself. Yes, I will certainly concede that the idiot that ignorantly walks into a lightening storm without the fear of the Universe (God’s Nature and Law) increases his chances of being judged for his stupidity, if you will. But the purpose of that discharge of energy we call as lightening has for its purpose nothing to do with any man or any other object it connects with. If man didn’t exist, lightening would still strike wherever Nature’s Design warranted it. And so it is with the notion of God’s Judgment. When the Law of God, the Law of Nature, and the Laws of Nature are broken, then it is only reasonable to conclude that some consequence (judgement) will follow, rebalancing the metaphorical scales of Nature’s permanent Design. Poison the drinking well, and the user of that well will be judged (poisoned) for his own sin. Eat unnaturally according to FDA recommendations and be judged with obesity, diabetes, cancer, or other illness. This is a neutral, or rather a causality effect, not a religious one. We reap what we sow, and most of the time we deserve the fate we create for ourselves.

The deceits promulgated by the church and state are seemingly insurmountable at times, just as the perceived need of money, the root fo all evil, is certainly the great destroyer of our time. To be deceived is a choice, and the Bible allows all men to be deceived if they choose to be. Free will… And, of course, the legal law of men depends upon deceit. Without deceit, there would be no nations, no governments, and no false gods heading those governments. The maxims of man’s law repeatedly tell us that he who seeks to be deceived cannot then complain about being deceived when he acts voluntarily in that deceit. Deceit is made legal by governments of the legal (artificial) realm, by contract, and specifically by voluntary participation in that deceitful practice. Contracts are the strings that control the puppet, which is why the Bible forbids them. For a contract is always between legal persons and therefore under the law of fictional (legal) persons, not God’s Law. Ignorance of God’s Law is no more an excuse than ignorance of man’s legal law according to its maxims and to the Bible. The difference is plain though, for the Bible warns against such deceits and gives you the Law of God (the allegory of Christ personified) in order to escape them. Thus, God’s Word (Law) is said to be the Armor of God, or in other words, the Shield and Sword of Truth (God). The Truth (God) will set you free, but only if you follow the Law of God (Truth/Nature) exemplified by the allegory of Christ. The legal system wholly depends on self-deceit, on illusion, on trickery, on dissimulation, and on the fact that those that are deceived remain in such a state of decay.

Job 12:16  – With him is strength and wisdom: the deceived and the deceiver are his (the destroyers’).

2Ti 3:13 – But evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse, deceiving, and being deceived.

Deu 11:16 – Take heed to yourselves, that your heart be not deceived, and ye turn aside, and serve other gods, and worship them;

Job 15:31 – Let not him that is deceived trust in vanity: for vanity shall be his recompence.

Luk 21:8 – And he said, Take heed that ye be not deceived: for many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and the time draweth near: go ye not therefore after them.

1Co 6:9-10 – Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.

1Co 6:11-12 – And such were some of you: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God. All things are lawful unto me, but all things are not expedient: all things are lawful for me, but I will not be brought under the power of any.

1Co 15:33 –  Be not deceived: evil communications corrupt good manners.

Gal 6:7 –  Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.

Rev 18:23 – And the light of a candle shall shine no more at all in thee; and the voice of the bridegroom and of the bride shall be heard no more at all in thee: for thy merchants (corporations) were the great men (artificial persons) of the earth; for by thy sorceries (pharmacopeia) were all nations deceived.

–=–

There is only one Law of Existence, of Nature, of Reality. The word Law is hardly adequate to describe It, for what word can possibly define what is self-Evident? This self-Existent (non-man-made) Order or Design is called as God’s Law, for God Is Reality, Is Truth, Is Nature, and Is All self-Existence — all that is not man-made. This Order of Nature, called as the Law of Nature (God), stands in self-evidence without exception, and is not alterable by men or by the artificial laws invented by men. All other so-called law is man-made, is consensual, voluntary, temporary, meaning that it must be contracted like any disease. And like a disease, man’s law will die without a host, without a volunteer, without victims; but only if you stop respecting it as Real, as part of God’s Nature. It always requires the breaking with the Law of God (Nature). There are no exceptions. There is no other law (doctrine) that does not specifically require one to break the Law of God, for no law of man is a self-evident part of God, that is, of Existence (Truth). No law of man is also a Law of Nature. There is no purpose for any law invented by man except to break the Law of God. There is no permit or license that is not intended to break with the Law of God. There is no legal person, place, or thing (name/noun) that is not intended to exist outside of the Realm and thus Law of God’s Nature. There is no positive invention by man that is not intended to control, harness, deceive, or destroy that which is a negative (already Existing) Creation of God. Man can only create artifice (art), and another word for art is technology. Only when mans creation is in harmony with and designed to protect and serve Nature can it be of the Will and Testament (Law/Word) of God. All of this is self-evident Truth, for the only Truth is God and that which is Created under and in harmony with Its Law. God does not invent, only man does.

The fool may consider such rhetoric to be a form of circular logic (dialectic). And yet no logic of man need be applied to the self-Existence of Godly things (of Nature). The circular notion of false logic is apparent by the flaws of its argument in referential to man-made (artificial) support for its accuracy. No-one can argue that Nature, in any way, is illogical, nor especially unreasonable. Its Design is beyond man’s capability of comprehension by use of the vulgar languages (including mathamatics), as all spiritual things are. What appears to the sophist as a circular logic is the very power of the negative aspect of Nature, which cannot be defeated by any positive (invention of man), unless one consents to that legal (anti-God) “fact” or “invention/design.” But a fact is not a Truth, and no facts need Exist in Nature, for Existence itself is self-evident Truth. Truth (God) needs no positively considered or pretended facts to Exist, and neither therefore does man. And that’s the point! That’s the power of God (Truth) — of being an anonymous part of God and thus part of and under the authority of the only whole and Highest Truth. In a spiritual and yes even circular way, one is protected from all lies when one remains in this circle of Truth, never allowing fiction and lies to break that spiritual circle. As they say, the Truth will set you free. For this circle is Real. It is Reality; the cycle of Nature. It is the realm of those who Live in and by the Grace of God and never accept what man has to offer in contract and thus become bound under the law of contracts (persons). For remember, a contract is only needed for those who seek to break with the Will and Testament (Law) of God, of self-government, of Love, Charity, Trust, Truth, and self-discipline. There are no contracts in Nature, in Love, in Charity, nor especially in Forgiveness. Understand this, and you may then literally and spiritually “under-stand” God’s Law. But if you comprehend it without applying it, you are indeed the very definition of a hypocrite (idolator).

–=–

“A contract founded on a base and unlawful consideration, or against good morals, is null.”

–Contractus ex turpi causa, vel contra bonos mores nullus est.  Hob. 167; Dig. 2, 14, 27, 4.

–=–

“The law never suffers anything contrary to truth. But sometimes it allows a conclusive presumption in opposition to truth.”

–Contra veritatem lex numquam aliquid permittit. ” 2 Co. Inst. 252. 24 See 3 Bouv. Inst. n. 3061.

–=–

“The agreement of the parties overcomes or prevails against the law.” 

–Conventio vincit legem. 2 Story, Ag. § See Dig. 16, 3, 1, 6.

–=–

The foundational maxims of law do not suffer anything that is not of the realm of Truth. But when a man can be tricked and deceived into entering into the legal contracts of the devil (attorneys), then this maxim invoking the power of Truth is bypassed. The law will suffer anything you can be deceived into accepting and volunteering for. For under contract, the Armor of Truth (God) is stripped from every man.

To avoid what is avoidable (man’s inventions and false, legal law) one must consciously avoid it. But once we accept or contract into what is avoidable, namely fraud, what is avoidable becomes unavoidable. This is where most of us stand. We are accepting and participating contractually in fraud (hypocrisy). The contract is valid because we don’t call it what it is. And if we do, if we understand the fraud, none of us are acting morally against it. Words are idols if those words are not acted upon, and so calling something as fraud while still acting in it is idolatry. Thus, we are still volunteering in that which is avoidable, for to nullify an immoral or otherwise unlawful contract under both realms of the law one must act with moral rectitude in opposition and avoidance against it. We are not doing so. The contract is lawful as long as the parties agree to it. And our agreement comes not in the form of words, but in the form of our actions in support of those legal (artificial) words. Contracts are excuses not to act under God’s Law. We act in the fraud, that is, in legal persona, therefore we accept the fraud. We pretended to become the fiction (person/title) and continue to pretend to be it. In other words, we are not following Christ (God’s Law), and are instead accepting the false, legal law (doctrine) of men. The legal system cannot be made null until men stop acting legally within it (against God’s Nature and Law). And most importantly, we cannot worship God nor follow Christ (Law) while acting in a legal persona (mask) that is required as property (status inside) of government to follow the legal, man-made, anti-God, antichrist, false law of men.

This was and is the reason behind the New Law, the New Testament, the allegorical blood sacrifice of Jesus Christ (Logos). We are part of the story. We were, through and because of the sacrifice of Logos, given cosmic free will. We were given the ability to attempt to break with the Law of Nature in a legal matrix of total self-deceit, though in Reality this is impossible. We were allowed to play the fool. But once we recognize ourselves as the fool, as I have recognized myself to be, it’s this point in our lives that we must either die to the secular world in order to find spiritual Life under God and Its Law, or we will continue, as so many of us are, to live by the deceits of the flesh in self-deceit and in hypocrisy.

If you’ve read this up to this point, then you know right now whether you are a hypocrite like me, or you are a son of God. If you are pretending to be the idol of a “Christian” then you know that such a placed upon yourself as a flattering title is either well-deserved by your actions or is carried in deceit as a false show in idolatry. And finally, you know now that the Bible cannot be dismissed as religious nonsense, and that should you choose to lift yourself out of this voluntary self-deceit that it’s you and only you that has the power to become Christ-like, to make the allegory of Christ become your own True story. You have the Armor. Now you must decide to bear it or throw it off for the sins (untruths) of the secular world.

And if you’re honest with yourself right now, you know the Truth is that you already know the answer, you already know your decision, because you already know the path, and from this point on you are either on that path or you are not. For most of you, including myself, this is what it feels like to Truly be a hypocrite.

Welcome to hell…

.

–Clint richard-son (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Wednesday, August 21st, 2019

 

Advertisements

A Treatise On Freeing Mankind From Corporate Bond And Surety


I am a person who likes to learn as much as possible about an action before taking it. And the most important lesson I’ve learned thus far is that nothing worth learning or doing is easy, and its implementation is generally that much more difficult. Thus, I am learning as best I can while fishing for truth in a sea of disinformation and “Universal Deceit”. Unfortunately, it seems that often the best lessons come from the fatal mistakes in action of others now incarcerated or necessarily fled from the corporation nation of the United States, that tiny but magnanimous district set aside by fools for total tyranny and oppression over the true founding principles and declaration of common equity and natural law within the confederation of self-governing states.

With that said, the following should not be regarded and is not intended as legal advice, but rather anti-legal advice from a non-attorney flesh and blood man who has become self-aware. In this spirit, I wish to relay to my readers and listeners my own personal plans based on what I have learned thus far – an outline for becoming truly free; as opposed to the acceptance of political freedom as a political privilege from government, and the enjoyment of that freedom only as long as I obey government’s uncountable statutes and private corporate law. “The Constitution of no Authority” which supposedly substantiates this corporate district and its legal codes of no authority no longer serve the best interests of any man, even among the wealthiest and most status holding common citizens. The following simply and honestly represents nothing but my own perceived path and is posted here with the intention and hope that others may follow on similar intersecting courses. In the end, without fallacy or ill-logic, I believe this to be the only solution for a free and thriving human race – a Renaissance of the individual conscious that can only take place within the individual empathetic mind of natural men, one soul at a time…

Many barriers to process and critical thinking stand in the way of this path – the path to self-actualization and true liberty under nature. First and foremost, as a barrier to realizing the self, is the almost religious concept of what citizenship is. This artificial political status of being a citizen and “person” must be comprehended before one can proceed in disregarding citizenship as an unnatural, corporate thing. Most importantly, we must realize that citizenship is not a defined thing. It is just a word used to represent the various ways in which an individual man has been enfranchised (denizened) into the government corporation through artificial and illicit means, and this word vaguely describes the many webs that place into bondage the soul through its fleshy body or vessel as surety. Indeed, “citizenship” is nothing if not a collection of various already null and unlawful contracts, and is certainly not a single thing for which one can point a finger at. It is an intangible. You cannot confidently point to some thing and say that is a “citizen”, for a living man is not artificial as a citizen is. Citizenship is not anything but a legal presumption to be rebutted; for the presumption is that the natural man carrying the artificial person (citizen) is always acting as if dead and in a commercial activity with the state. The state wishes every man woman and child to believe that every action they take is a commercial venture to be regulated under corporate statute – even a trip to the grocery store or to drop the kids off at the park. Thus the most simple solution to this imposed state of artificiality is to create for yourself a disposition to where the government and its private BAR association courts can never assume you to be dead (an artificial person in regulated commerce) and in a status as an artificial corporate person. Simply stated, you must always be alive! For a living man is invisible to the government and its courts (jurisdiction) without an artificial (dead) person (state created identification) attached to the living body in surety and bond-age.

Let’s use a similar example: In order to officially quit my membership to a gym (membership = citizenship), I must have a solution in order to leave that gym. I must end my contract in good standing and with honor, lest that gyms collectors (agents) haunt me for the rest of my life as an honor-less debtor under contract.

The word solution means one and only one thing for our purposes, which in its legal definition means only to end or satisfy contract. There are no solutions to government tyranny and oppression of your natural rights under the natural law without a solution. There are no other forms or types of solutions, for the word has only this meaning in legal language. Thus, as government is a purely artificial legally created corporation, one must only speak to government as a citizen in a legal capacity with legal terms. Any other attempts to communicate or to terminate your contractual relationship with government will be fruitless and without standing, for as an artificial person speaking to an artificial corporation, you must speak the language of the dead. There is no love or other emotion in legal entities, for they are lifeless and without a soul. A protest sign will be ignored, simply because the language is not written in the proper legal context, not notarized, and not sent to the proper legal office. Emotion is not recognized in legal settings any more than the soul – it is out of order and without artificial political status. Emotion stems from life. Government acknowledges only the dead person.

So this process of ending our membership (citizenship) with the United States must similarly be an honorable one. If you have debt or other form of obligation it must come to a solution before your contractual separation from the government, for separation of your body and soul as surety in contract to 2the go2vernment created artificial (dead) person cannot be done without honor. Only in honor can one proceed…

Honor, not ironically, in the legal language again means one and only one thing – duty to pay or satisfy a contractual obligation or debt. Government has no natural honor among men for government is not a man – it is an artificial person (corporation). The biggest mistake you can make is to expect dignity and honor from government. Government is dead, and thus only operates under the legal language. In other words, in no way does government honor your mother or father, accept to recognize their status as dead citizen in order to force payment of a debt or obligation. And government certainly does not honor God and the natural law. An unnatural entity does not exist and does not recognize anything in nature, and is not capable of knowing God. Government has no soul!

So before I can proceed and be transformed into my inherent honorable natural man with no contractual ties (citizenship) to any corporation (government) through any artificial person (contract), I must first honor (pay or satisfy) all of my contractual debts (duties/obligations)… even if I know these contractual obligations were made in fraud. This concept may be repulsive to many conscious folks out there, but we must remember that in man’s law, the law of contract represents the obligation of persons who applied for that status and debt freely and knowingly under unilateral contract. While many other “remedies” in government’s legal codes exist to escape a legal contractual debt without honoring it, the debt never truly goes away until it is honored. And an honorable man (representing a “person” in contract) will go much farther than one with a record of dishonor in their person, even within government. Like it or not, this is a self-evident truth.

Man’s law does not distinguish honor in any capacity or relation to the soul, for the legal language is unemotional and has no traditional honor or chivalry as we generally and conversationally perceive the words from scripture, our parents, and from other living sources. Honor, again, only means one thing in legalese… to pay off a debt or satisfy an obligation (political duty). As a citizen/person, you must act like one and speak accordingly.

When in Rome, give Caesar his due…

A clean, debt free artificial person thus carries no ties or bond to the natural man it was placed upon, for there is no longer any duty as surety if there is no obligation or debt attached to the artificial person (end and satisfaction of contract), thus no need or legal cause for collectors (agents). The surety need not exist if no future commerce shall be utilized by the natural man under the artificial corporate person. And thus no bond can legally continue to exist to require citizenship if no debt is acquired or existing under that artificial person (corporate surname). In other words, debt and obligation are the puppet strings that insure and control your strawman, and satisfaction of that debt and obligation equals the cutting of those strings – a fly escaping the web.

STRAWMAN – 1. Draft or outline copy ready for suggestions and comments. 2. Third party used as a cover in illegal or shady deals. 3. Nominee director. 4. A weak or flawed person with no standing. Also called man of straw.

STRAMINEUS HOMO – L. Latin. A man of straw, one of no substance, put forward as bail or surety.

–Black’s Law 2nd Edition

After many years of research and comprehension, it has become my firm opinion that no process or remedy within man’s commercial law of government will be successful, for it requires one to still play under government tyranny in an artificial capacity. One cannot escape from a deep hole while standing within. One must partake in this important step (satisfaction of debt), for there can be no legal snares left to entangle the natural man (mind, body and soul) with what the corporation (government) has subscribed to the debt-based artificial (dead) citizen (person).

It is my hope that when one considers the information I am presenting here, it will become clear that this is the only true reasonable and logically correct solution there is to the debt slavery we call citizenship, for always remember that to government, solution can and only ever will mean “to end or satisfy contract”.

When considering our status in the eyes and opinion of the soulless inequity of the ad-ministerial court system, debt and obligation under contract must come to an honorable solution before we can proceed to shed government as our corporate ad-ministrant. As per this reality and necessity of legally honoring our own individual debts and obligations, it is imperative for you to understand the following Maxim’s of law, which will be fully understood and are a requirement to be utilized by the administrative judge who oversees your person in a trial if you try and get out of your debt or obligation without honorable (paid or legal) satisfaction and solution. In all cases I’ve read, these maxims are always applied, a well laid trap with the appearance of holy righteousness. Unfortunately, the law does not favor the uneducated, and allows with perfect clarity for the common man to enter into fraud through consent and contract. Here are a few of those maxims that will be considered when trying to bring debt or obligation to a solution (translated from Latin) in less than an honorable way:

–=–

The contract makes the law.

The agreement of the parties makes the law of the contract.

The agreement of the parties overcomes or prevails against the law.

Consent makes the law:A contract is a law between the parties,
which can acquire force only by consent.

He who consents cannot receive an injury.

Consent removes or obviates a mistake.

Consent makes the law: The terms of a contract, lawful in its purpose,
constitute the law as between the parties.

Agreement takes the place of the law: the express understanding
of parties supersedes such understanding as the law would imply.

–=–

One who avails himself of the benefits conferred by statute cannot deny its validity.

What I approve I do not reject. I cannot approve and reject at the same time.
I cannot take the benefit of an instrument, and at the same time repudiate it.

He who derives a benefit from a thing, ought to feel the disadvantages attending it.

He who enjoys the benefit, ought also to bear the burden.

He who enjoys the advantage of a right takes the accompanying disadvantage.
A privilege is, as it were, a private law.

A privilege is a personal benefit and dies with the person.

–=–

He who does not deny, admits.

He is not deceived who knows himself to be deceived.

He who does not forbid a crime while he may, sanctions it.

He who does not repel a wrong when he can, induces it.

He who does not forbid what he can forbid, seems to assent.

He who does not prevent what he can prevent, is viewed as assenting.

–=–

There is no fiction without law.

Fictions arise from the law, and not law from fictions.

Where truth is, fiction of law does not exist.

Fiction is against the truth, but it is to have truth.

A fiction is a rule of law that assumes something
which is or may be false as true.

In a fiction of law, equity always subsists.

A fiction of law injures no one.

Fiction of law is wrongful if it works loss or injury to any one.

–=–

An outlaw is, as it were, is put out of the protection of the law.

–=–

Please remember that anytime you appear before a magistrate or false-judge, these are but a few of the maxims of law that will be honored. Here we see the reasons why the judicial is seemingly so corrupt, when in reality it is just following the maxims of law in promoting the fraudulent contractual nature of citizenship and other contracts. Truly, the court does not suffer fools – those men who are ignorant of their own contractual and consenting nature that places artificial fictional law of contract over that of God’s natural law. In other words, the courts are literally required to recognize even the most fraudulent contract under man’s law according to these scriptural maxims. We have played the fool for too long, and it is time for us all to have solution in honor. For the natural law of God suffers no fools either. Under natural law, one is wholly responsible for all of their actions, and no protections are offered for those who cannot govern themselves under that only de jure law.

Why must we first recognize and then cast out that of our artificial (dead) person?

Remembering that the scripture creates the law and its maxims, we can read continuously from the Bible that man should never hold an artificial status above others:

“For there is no respecting of persons with God.” (Romans 2: 11)

“Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons: but in every nation he that feareth him, and worketh righteousness, is accepted with him” (Acts 10:34-35 , KJV)

“For not the hearers of the law are just before God, but the doers of the law shall be justified (i.e. walking the path of natural law). For when the Gentiles (people/citizens/persons), which have not the (natural) law, do by nature the things contained in the (government) law, these, having not the (natural) law, are a (false/private) law unto themselves (person-hood): Which shew the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness, and their thoughts the mean while (in court and in churches) accusing or else excusing one another…” (Romans 2, 13-15, KJV)

It is important to comprehend that the Bible as used in the court room represents the evidence and therefore the abused authority of law. The word testament means evidence.

It is also important to note that the word scripture has nothing to do with religion, but is a general term for the passing on of knowledge. Therefore any book of knowledge could technically be referred to as “scripture”. But we must also remember that only one book is “authorized” as the scripture of the natural law, which is the Bible. Your personal beliefs go out the window on this subject, for we are speaking here of government not yourself.

TEST’AMENT, n. [L. testamentum, from testor, to make a will.] 1. A solemn authentic instrument in writing, by which a person declares his will as to the disposal of his estate and effects after his death. This is otherwise called a will. A testament, to be valid, must be made when the testator is of sound mind, and it must be subscribed, witnessed and published in such manner as the law prescribes. –Webster’s Dictionary of English Language, 1828

SCRIP’TURE, n. [L. scriptura, from scribo, to write.] 1. In its primary sense, a writing; any thing written. 2. Appropriately, and by way of distinction, the books of the Old and New Testament; the Bible. The word is used either in the singular or plural number, to denote the sacred writings or divine oracles, called sacred or holy, as proceeding from God and containing sacred doctrines and precepts. There is not any action that a man ought to do or forbear, but the Scripture will give him a clear precept or prohibition for it. Compared with the knowledge which the Scriptures contain, every other subject of human inquiry is vanity and emptiness.

Remember, this is the legal definition, not your own. And we have to remember that words like sacred and holy usually refer to the opinions of government and church, not to God. The oath is a sacred ritual of the church, for instance, but not because it is sacred to God. The church and government, acting in replacement (vicar) of Christ (the new testament and evidence of law) is the legal entity receiving benefit of the pledge and oath, not God. Just as U.S. soldiers take an oath to the president and the constitution, but never to God or to the common man or citizens. To the contrary, all soldiers, officers, congress, attorneys, and the president of the United States take an oath to protect the District of Columbia corporation called “United States” and its “possessions” from the foreign and domestic people of America. The United States is not America. It sits outside of America and is not one of the states united. It is a corporation for which free people contract with in order to receive “protection” from it. But after reading the maxims above, it is easy to comprehend that with the benefit of rights, freedom, and protection, citizens must suffer 1,000’s of obligations and punishments, taxes and licenses, exaction and extortion of every kind. This is the price of respecting artificial persons, just as the Bible forewarns.

Back to Scripture:

“Let us appreciate the fact that while the Law of Moses (Old Testament or evidence of law for Jews) has been abrogated, we are under the law of Christ (Gal 6:2 I Cor. 9: 21). This law is unique in that it is law and grace (remedy) combined, hence, the perfect law of liberty (see Jn 1:17). Jude refers to “common salvation” available to all men through Christ (Jude 3)”, (which later became known as the “common law”, and is now usurped by the law of Merchants and thieves (bankers)).

RESPECT OF PERSONS – re-spekt’: The phrase nasa’ phanim, means literally, “lift up the face,” and, among other translations, is rendered indifferently “accept” or “respect the person” in the King James Version (contrast Prov 18:5 and 24:23). As applied to a (prostrate) suppliant, the phrase means “receive him with favor,” and is so used in 1 Sam 25:35; Mal 1:8,9 (compare Gen 19:21, etc.). By a shift in force the phrase came to mean “accept the person instead of the cause” or “show partiality” (Job 13:8,10 the American Standard Revised Version), and is so used commonly. A literal translation into Greek gave lambano prosopon (Sirach 35:13 (32:16); Lk 20:21; Gal 2:6), with the noun prosopolempsia, “face-taking” (Rom 2:11; Eph 6:9; Col 3:25; Jas 2:1), rendered uniformly “respect of persons” in English Versions of the Bible. A noun prosopolemptes, “respecter of persons,” and a verb prosopolempteo, are found Acts 10:34; Jas 2:9. God’s judgment rests solely on the character of the man and will be influenced by no worldly (Eph 6:9) or national (Rom 2:11) considerations. (Source: http://classic.net.bible.org/dictionary.php?word=Respect%20of%20Persons)

In essence, we see here that the status of person-hood (a hood of artificial clothing/status) refers to the assignment of citizenship or other legal status, for which God (nature) does not recognize or respect. In short, we are born naked and will die naked – stripped of any wealth and perceived legal status assigned by unnatural persons (governments, societies, and churches) that we also should not respect according to the words of Christ in the Bible, who simply taught and shared the evidence of how to live under natural law without persons (corporations). Where more than in the United States of America do we see the pervasive state of artificial status in justifying atrocities of war, pestilence, and poverty over other persons and nations? And what people in the world consider themselves more privileged as persons/citizens of the state than in America, denying all others this status without “naturalizing” into an artificial status called citizen or resident?

America and its population are literally suffocating under a pile of artificial personages and privilege against nature, with virtually no man living under the natural law. And in case you haven’t noticed, nature in all of its heavenly glory is suffering because of it.

In reality, the District and corporation we call the United States has only one purpose – to step over the natural law and natural inherent rights of men, only to replace those rights with revokable privileges against God’s (natural) Law. For an artificial person (government corporation) can not deal in nature, but only in artificiality and death. It must by necessity for its continuity strip anything natural from mankind in order to rule over God and nature, for God recognizes no persons. And if it’s not obvious by now, neither should you.

–=–
Step By Step
–=–

I will also say that my research and conclusions have led me to understand that the only actual process for becoming a free man without legal constraints (person-hood) of any kind involves the following necessities:

1) Perhaps the hardest step is the 1st one. For the government of the Church has destroyed true knowledge and understanding of the Bible and its paramount place in civil (pagan) and cannon (ecclesiastical) law. The civil law was created within the Catholic church to deal with non-church related business. The corporate church has promoted the anthropomorphism and fundamentalist fallacy of the allegories (stories) within the New Testament, hiding the fact that the testament is the very evidence of the law of nature and the path to being self-governing free men as presented in stories that men could tell other men in their illiteracy, similar to mythology as one of many scriptures of alagoric knowledge. The Bible indeed is the foundation and land-lordly god-like authority of all of man’s ecclesiastic and civil law to rule over men in contract and force, offering a choice of freewill to follow mammon (man’s statutory legal law and debt-money system) or to follow the path taught by the character of Christ under God and nature.

In freemasonry and other societies and corporate churches, the common people are considered fools – goyim, to be managed and controlled for their acceptance and unwitting consent to man’s law with absolute ignorance of what the Bible teaches of the natural path. And this is why corporate churches rule supreme over the reality of the Bible as tools of those holding sacred scriptural knowledge. And so first and foremost, regardless of your actual belief, you must recognize a higher power (God) so as to disclaim the Vatican’s and Crown’s claim of being the “lord god” over man, acting in place of God as temporal (non-spiritual) ruler in God’s name – the “Vicor of Christ”. In other words, one must become a true Christian without title or status (person). For most this is a difficult transition, no matter if you are religious or atheist. For a true Christian cannot also be a member of any corporate church, be it Catholic, Methodist, Protestant, Jewish (old testament/evidence), etc… no more than a true natural man can be a member (citizen) of government and also be a free man. These 501 tax-exempt churches are all without exception idols (simulations) and are corporations of and for the government. They are ultimately false, containing their own doctrines against and purposefully to hide the true teachings within the Bible. True Christianity has no borders, buildings, or other symbols, for it is of the individual mind, body, and soul. Christianity is the words of the character Christ, not the words of a minister or preacher.

This is similar to the oxymoron of “sovereign citizen”, for of course one can not be sovereign with supreme power over all and also be a subject to government rule as a citizen (debt slave). Likewise, one cannot be Christian and at the same time follow another (man-made) doctrine. One cannot worship saints as a Catholic and also qualify to be a Christian, for idol worship is against Christ’s teachings, and even against the ten commandments. When a people (goy) worship outside of the natural law and from outside of nature, the consequences are easily seen today, as most proclaimed Christians follow church doctrine as opposed to the actual teachings of Christ in natural law. For God is nature. A cursory look up to the polluted and Geo-engineered sky is proof enough of mans battle to overcome God’s law of nature.

This action does not require belief in “God” or that Jesus was a real man, for that argument is yet another obfuscation from the teachings of the Bible of the natural law (God’s law) and by those whom for centuries have tried to exterminate true followers of natural law without government, sometimes called “true Christians”. But even a follower of Christ’s teachings understands that the term “Christian” is yet another legal status, and that Christ never commanded his followers to use that title and legal status. All that is required is the deep understanding and true comprehension that without acknowledgment of a higher power (God), man may rule as lord in God’s place. This is the law and doctrine of consent and contract, and God will never respect or protect persons. And the act of becoming truly a follower of Christ’s teachings may be translated here as nothing more than to follow the teachings of Jesus Christ to learn and live under God’s Natural Law. For the Maxim’s of law in all governments are of scripture, and this is easily verified. Denial of God as a higher power than government and church (mammon) actually legally proves that man’s governing law must prevail over God’s law – the price of ignorance for those who have been brainwashed by the church to dismiss or replace the Bible with church doctrine – which is ironically the creator of the very mammon the church wishes man to follow so as to govern and control man.

Here again, the judge is obligated and will conduct himself ad-ministerially upon the following Maxim’s of Law, (God’s Law = Natural Law) and always presumes that the defendant in any case knows God and chooses mammon (the doctrine of freewill) as God’s replacement. A citizen turns his back on God, and therefore chooses government over self-governance according to natural law. In reality, each court is a church. The judge is present to ad-minister the evidence of law. You must be able to tell that minister (judge) that you are not a member (citizen) of his church (government), and that your only judge will be a higher power than the state pretending to be gods.

These are more of the maxims of law, that the ad-minister (judge) uses, and is why the Bible is present in every court for swearing in:

–=–

All men know God. [Hebrews 8:11]

That is the highest law which favors religion.

To swear (in by oath) is to call God to witness, and is an act of religion.

Truth, by whomever pronounced, is from God.

Truth is the mother of justice.

Truth fears nothing but concealment.

He who becomes a soldier of Christ
has ceased to be a soldier of the world. [2 Timothy 2:3-4]

No man warring for God should be troubled by secular business.

If ever the law of God and man are at variance,
the former are to be obeyed in derogation of the later. [Acts 5:29]

That which is against Divine Law is repugnant to society and is void.

Where the Divinity is insulted the case is unpardonable.

Human things never prosper when divine things are neglected.

The Law of God and the law of the land are all one,
and both favor and preserve the common good of the land.

–=–

The presumption that all men know God is the most important aspect of man’s ecclesiastical and civil (pagan) law, for we must remember that the Bible is evidence (testament) of the law, presented as both mammon and natural within its pages. Man may choose to respect the person assigned by government to him, but this necesarily projects that person into the pagan law of civil authority (law without God’s natural law considered). The taking of status and person-hood is the taking of civil (pagan) law, and the understanding that the court can offer no protection from God (natural law). Therefore, as the law of nature is taught only by the character Jesus Christ, following in the natural law path in self-governance to escape church and government oppression and contract is the same thing as becoming a “true Christian”. For the follower of Christ’s teachings according to the Bible (evidence of the law), must by nature shed all artificial persons (corporations) to be free under that law. A true Christian has no membership to any church or government, and yet he or she is governed by the laws of God and nature to do no harm to others or their property as taught. Your personal beliefs in God and religion are irrelevant, for we are only talking here about the path to being free men (men = natural male and female, i.e. mankind).

In the end, to be a free man, one must have a remedy and exemption from man’s law. This remedy is the evidence of Jesus Christ as lord and savior. This may be repulsive to many foolish people because of the conditioning of the corporate church to destroy any semblance of true Christianity in lieu of the Vicor’s ecclesiastical rule, but we must remember that we are not speaking in religious terms here, but legal ones. For we are dealing not with a natural creation of God, but a legal creation called government, and therefore we must have a religious exemption that is of higher authority than man’s claim to rule as a lesser god. In short, church and government considers itself to be the middleman between us and God. So we must bypass the middleman and report directly to the God (authority) that the megalomaniacs of government and church purport to rule by and with permission of for those who cannot govern themselves under God’s law.

LORD = landlord, master in law (currently government and corporate church)

LORD, n. 1. A master; a person possessing supreme power and authority; a ruler; a governor. Man over man he made not lord. But now I was the lord of this fair mansion. 2. A tyrant; an oppressive ruler. 3. A husband. I oft in bitterness of soul deplores my absent daughter, and my dearer lord. My lord also being old. Gen. 18. 4. A baron; the proprietor of a manor; as the lord of the manor. 5. A nobleman; a title of honor in Great Britain given to those who are noble by birth or creation; a peer of the realm, including dukes, marquises, earls, viscounts and barons. Archbishops and bishops also, as members of the house of lords, are lords of parliament. Thus we say, lords temporal and spiritual. By courtesy also the title is given to the sons of dukes and marquises, and to the eldest sons of earls. 6. An honorary title bestowed on certain official characters; as lord advocate, lord chamberlain, lord chancellor, lord chief justice, &c.7. In scripture, the Supreme Being; Jehovah. When Lord, in the Old Testament, is printed in capitals, it is the translation of JEHOVAH, and so might, with more propriety, be rendered. The word is applied to Christ, Ps. 110. Col. 3. and to the Holy Spirit, 2Thess. 3. As a title of respect, it is applied to kings, Gen. 40. 2Sam. 19. to princes and nobles, Gen 42. Dan. 4. to a husband, Gen. 18. to a prophet, 1Kings 18. 2Kings 2. and to a respectable person, Gen. 24. Christ is called the Lord of glory, 1Cor. 2. and Lord of lords, Rev. 19.

(Note here that only when capitalized in the Bible is the word God or Lord applied to Christ or to God. All other Bible words like the un-capitalized “gods” and “lords” refer to the temporal replacement of Christ/God on earth as landlord ruling by false authority of Christ. This is the Pope, the Biships, the Queen, the Presidents, the Prime Ministers, etc. Often they rule under a “Corporation Sole” as a sovereign outside of their own created legal civil laws. A corporation sole is of the church, not of the government.

Read more: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporation_sole

LORD, v.t. To invest with the dignity and privileges of a lord.

(Notice the word lord is not capitalized, thus not referring to God. A lord is a form of artificial person, and should not be respected or given false authority under God and natural law.)

LORD, v.i. To domineer; to rule with arbitrary or despotic sway; sometimes followed by over, and sometimes by it, in the manner of a transitive verb.

–above from Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1828

SAVIOR = saved from artificial person-hood (slavery) and placed into the natural law.

SAVIOR, n. savyur. One that saves or preserves; but properly applied only to Jesus Christ, the Redeemer (remedy in law), who has opened the way to everlasting salvation by his obedience and death, and who is therefore called the Savior, by way of distinction, the Savior of men, the Savior of the world. General Washington may be called the saver, but not the savior of his country

REDEE’MER, n. 1. One who redeems or ransoms.2. The Savior of the world, JESUS CHRIST.

REDEE’M, v.t. [L. redimo; red, re, and emo, to obtain or purchase.] 1. To purchase back; to ransom; to liberate or rescue from captivity or bondage, or from any obligation or liability to suffer or to be forfeited, by paying an equivalent; as, to redeem prisoners or captured goods; to redeem a pledge. 2. To repurchase what has been sold; to regain possession of a thing alienated (i.e. the body as bonded surety) by repaying the value of it to the possessor (solution by end or satisfaction of contract)… 7. To save. He could not have redeemed a portion of his time for contemplating the powers of nature. 8. To perform what has been promised; to make good by performance. He has redeemed his pledge or promise.9. In law, to recall an estate, or to obtain the right to re-enter upon a mortgaged estate by paying to the mortgagee his principal, interest, and expenses or costs. 10. In theology, to rescue and deliver from the bondage of sin and the penalties of God’s violated law, by obedience and suffering in the place of the sinner, or by doing and suffering that which is accepted in lieu of the sinner’s obedience. Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us. Gal. 3. Titus 2.11. In commerce, to purchase or pay the value in specie, of any promissory note, bill or other evidence of debt, given by the state, by a company or corporation, or by an individual. The credit of a state, a banking company or individuals, is good when they can redeem all their stock, notes or bills, at par. To redeem time, is to use more diligence in the improvement of it; to be diligent and active in duty and preparation. Eph. 5.

–above from Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1828

It is important to note here that the word sin or sinner as used in the Bible also has duel meanings, depending upon which lord/Lord or god/God it is being applied to. The word sin is taken from the word “synn” – in old english, “moral wrongdoing, injury, mischief, enmity, feud, guilt, crime, offense against God, misdeed,. This word within the legal law of man’s temporal church and government however, means to sin against the government law of mammon, and thus be subject to the wrath of the lord god (church and state). Sin, in legal law, means to be “guilty” of a crime against church or government, not against God and nature. Government is not of nature, and therefore a sin against government is not a sin against God. The Declaration of Independence spells this out quite nicely, as this was a declaration of the natural inherent rights of men, whereas the constitution was a declaration of man’s rule of law over God’s natural law. These two documents are totally opposed to each other, and yet they are taught to both be inspired by God. The the constitution is nothing but the creation of and respect of a person (corporation). How can that be inspired by God?

The word hell also refers to two different places. One, the spiritual Hell, refers to the spiritual world. But hell was actually the true name of the dungeon or prison located beneath the kings courts in older days (debtors prisons). These were for the goyim (persons) who did not honor (pay) their debts to the king and church on time.

HELL – The name formerly given to a place under the exchequer chamber, where the king’s debtors were confined. Rich. Diet  –Black’s Law Dictionary, 2nd Edition

Unbeknownst and just out of reach of the collective group-think mentality of the citizens of the United States, each and every person is literally living in hell – a giant open-air prison for debtors as government chattel. The national debt and ongoing bankruptcy of the United States corporation ensures that all persons as citizens and all registered property and real estate are declared to be used as the good faith and credit of the United States as collateral for the bankruptcy under martial law (see Leiber Code).
And so it turns out that all of these words we have taken for granted, with the help of government,  its corporate religions, and a horrific system of required government education. Most of our language in fact has duel meanings under the natural and political (legal) realm. In the end, the English language is a word magik trap for those who are controlled as goy by the corporate church and governments around the world.

Forget the doctrines of religion, for the teachings of walking on the path of natural law is the only religion (in America, as recognized by legal law); one without private corporate doctrine. And it’s teacher is the character of Jesus Christ. It requires no church and no leader but you. What may happen to ones beliefs and “faith” after one is walking this path of God (nature) is a whole other subject, and is for the individual to work out for themselves outside of corporations and falsely taught doctrines that take one away from the natural path to worship saints, symbols, and sacrileges. It is my belief that more people will come back to God and nature by walking the natural law path than will ever be converted through fear and intimidation of the Pope and Ministers of corporations with their own designs to enslave the mind and body – the vessel for the soul.

For through Christ’s teachings of natural law all things are possible, if only there’s no government to stand in the way.

But more importantly, through Christ’s teachings, one may recognize that because some thing is possible, it very well might ought not be created against nature. “Do as thou wilt”, the infamous church of satanism’s coveted credo, was stolen and warped from the original credo of Christ, which is written – “Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them: for this is the law and the prophets.” (Mathew 7:12). In natural law, this is easily stated as do no harm to others or their property. With this rule, no societal law can be broken, and a free man may never need the judgement of the courts of that society of artificial persons playing god.

–=–
The Body Of Christ
–=–

2) Now that the soul is taken care of and has the safety, security, and lawful and legal remedy of the natural law of God to fall upon as recognized legally by the state and its courts of inequity, we must now focus on the physical body – legally referred to as the vessel. Each individual person must begin the arduous process of shedding their corporate veil of clothing, ridding all contractual connections to “the state” and shedding all positive law rights, privileges, immunities, and benefits from government – for God and nature recognizes and respects none of these personages. Acceptance of any benefit or right from government to exalt oneself over others in unnatural inequity necessarily requires the natural living man to become and respect an artificial person (status). Thus no tie or contract must be left unsatisfied regarding the citizen. The Bible states over and over to not respect “persons”. This refers to our own corporate fiction called the artificial person, as well to the entirety of all corporations, including church and government.

So if we consider for a moment, our end goal here is to never be a dead (artificial) person, and to always be in the disposition of being a living, sentient being under God’s law and no other. If one is never an artificial (dead) person in a dead pledge, one can never be recognized as anything but a living natural man. He cannot be a person, for a person is artificial. He cannot be a citizen, for a citizen is artificial. He cannot be a member, for a membership is an artificial status requiring a person. However, he can be a true Christian, for being a Christian requires no membership or citizenship, no contract, nothing artificial, and it has no fictional borders or legalities. We seek a civil death.

DEAD PLEDGEA mortgage; mortuum vadium. –Black’s Law Dictionary, 2nd Edition

MORTMAIN – A term applied to denote the alienation of lands or tenements to any corporation, sole or aggregate, ecclesiastical or temporal. These purchases having been chiefly made by religious houses, in consequence of which lands became perpetually inherent in one dead hand, this has occasioned the general appellation of “mortmain” to be applied to such alienations.

DEAD HAND – A provision contained within some POISON PILL defenses preventing the acquisition of the company by another firm even if a majority of shareholders approve of the offer. Only incumbent DIRECTORS can remove the provision.

CIVIL DEATH – Civil death, which is that change in a person’s legal and civil condition which deprives him of civic rights and juridical capacities and qualifications, as natural death extinguishes his natural condition. It follows as a consequence of being attainted of treason or felony, in English law, and anciently of entering a monastery or abjuring the realm. The person in this condition is said to be civiliter mortuus, civilly dead, or dead in law.

To obtain the status of free man, one must necessarily kill his civil artificial person – he or she must have a civil death to live under the natural law. For again, God and nature do not respect or recognize persons. We are born naked and ultimately die naked. We  are born innocent under nature and we take no status with us in our natural death. We cannot hide from our actions, even when done under the auspices of artificial persons, for the person dies with the man and God recognizes and respects no person.

–=–

3) Next comes the Paperwork. Form SSA-521 is a good place to start, though through my own research it may be better to not use any government (mammon) produced forms but to emulate them and US CODE in the scribing of such legal notification and demand in freehand. This form SSA-521 (or legal demand) kills the original application for Social Security, nipping it in the butt so that the account or trust attached to the monetized application cannot exist or be attached to the man through his or her name (corporate surname). This is one step in detaching your natural body from being a surety to the contractual nature of the artificial person government has assigned to you. This is a retroactive step to nullify this person (number) by declaring it fraud from its inception, as no child can make a contract under age and without understanding. Once this is done and verified, any and all contracts, including the DMV driver’s license, Selective Service, Voter Registration, and any and all other accounts or trusts connected to the Social Security number are automatically null and void due to the now recognized fraud of that number and person. So a series of legal demands would need to be sent as notice and verification to each individual government agency severing these now illegitimate contracts. I would then sever any personal contracts for which I had used my artificial person as bail and surety with (I must end or satisfy all contracts as the solution). This would include my gym, Costco, the library, etc. The end goal would be to have a completely debt and contract free “person” that is attachable to the natural man, for only then can the natural man not be forcibly held as surety for the debts and contracts of the artificial person (in the court’s opinion). Thus the state cannot invoke the authority of its position of lord god over your person by holding you as a free man under the real “God” with Christ as your remedy responsible for any debt or obligation of the person.

–=–

4) The next hardest step – Quit ones job. I would of course attempt to be immediately rehired as a “represented” employee that is a private contractor and non-taxpayer. Nothing really has to change here, other than the ensured severing of the contractual relationship with the State and IRS to be a taxpayer/citizen. As I said, no contractual state of artificiality can be left other than the bare minimum personal contract without the corporate name. Many use only a handshake. Many revert to getting paid in gold or other commodities or services. Anything is better than being a slave to mammon.

–=–

5) Declare your independence from government and your dependence on Christ/God in remedy simultaneously. I have written an extensive declaration of my own individual independence of which I will be posting to the Federal and State websites and perhaps carring personally to the federal district, as well as many international forums. I’m not sure this step needs to be done in any order, but I will personally likely reserve it until this point when all debts are honored and obligations null.

If you’d like to read the first draft of my own personal declaration which needs editing and additions, click the link below:

LINK–> https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2012/12/28/a-new-declaration-of-independence-for-free-men/

–=–

6) Be free…

But now the journey really just begins, for as you have probably noted, the Bible tells us that true Christians (followers of Christ’s teachings) will without a doubt be persecuted and even killed for their efforts to be separated from the corporate, corporal world of artificial church and state person-hood. Since at this point you will certainly be one of the very few true Christians on this continent, you will have no government to protect you or elevate you to a person-hood that grants you false status over other men. You will be responsible for all of your own actions, without the false paradigm of insurance and social welfare. You will be shunned by corporations who wish you to join them and become artificial members/citizens again. It will be a constant temptation to become artificial if only for convenience of the trans-humanist biometric agenda. Your children will be shunned, but at least they will for once be your own with no legality that says they belong to the state. Your use of credit cards will be nullified. You will not be able to use biometrics, for there will be no artificial person/citizen that a biometric scanner can match you to, for you are now 100% of the time a living sentient being with no strawman.

And yet unbeknownst to most, it is actually illegal to require a social security number from an applicant. A free man may sue that man posing as a “person” for discrimination. For as a free man, one may still use the restrictive laws of government against it.

Honestly, from this point on, only experience alone will reveal the path, unless you can find others walking in it. I intend to start a community if at all possible, or find one already in existence for support and fellowship. In theory and in practice this can not be turned into a cult, for there is no sovereign ruler but yourself over your own will and (new) testament of Christ. You have no obligation but to obey the laws of nature, do no harm, and be responsible for your actions. And as a guidepost to avoiding the doctrines of persons, any man who seeks your membership in blood or by signature is indeed not on the right path. This makes avoidance of mammon almost second nature.

Honestly, you will have to figure it out as you go, even as you are persecuted. But persecution is indeed a badge of courage and honor – of non-conformity to mammon. This is the best I can describe what my goals will be. Unfortunately, the rewards of being truly free under God and nature is likely not appealing to most citizen-slaves that are in many ways vested in their own debt enslavement, from pensions to welfare, which as discussed is a perfectly legal form of servitude and slavery under the false god called government and church.

Walking into Christian persecution may not sound like success to most, but to me it sounds like the road to heaven as harmony with nature and therefore God.

The thought of walking through the TSA checkpoint at the airport by simply and honorably stating that I am not in fact a U.S. citizen and that my business is private here as a natural man without name or status is especially appealing to me, as I simply say no to being scanned and touched inappropriately. For there is no jurisdiction that applies to a free man under the self-governance of God but that of nature. I do know of others who have created their own “I.D.” – for identification is whatever you say and choose it to be when you have not to bow to anyone else but Christ’s jurisdiction.

Like I said, this is not legal advice. I hope the harsh reality of it harmonizes with your natural instinct. I believe it is the only way, for I don’t believe one status is better than another – that a house slave is still a slave no matter how wealthy and privileged. UCC and other methods and remedies cannot by their nature make a man free, for they all require some corporate status of person-hood or other artificiality or trust, where upon the doctrine of commerce creates legal contract.

I suppose you could say that being a free and natural man means most of all that you will be totally and wholly 100% responsible for your own well-being and safety, and for that of all others. It means no welfare, no medicare, no retirement, and no protection from the nanny government. This is enough to “make most people love their servitude”, to quote Huxley.

Most of all I wish to empathize. I understand your reticence when it comes to the word “God”. My mind is much too analytical and rational to accept the doctrines of corporate churches, as I am sure that most professed corporate Christians feel the same way beneath their public personas within their perspective church settings. This remedy is for all people, for it requires no doctrine, membership, or contract but that of holding precious the natural law. A year ago, before I comprehended the true form and authority of the Bible as the law of man and nature, I would have properly poo-poo’ed this treatise of mine as crazy and religious nonsense. Only time may make one realize their foolish ways, myself included. So here is my own personal truth…

I don’t personally believe in or bow to any God, only because God is not something that man can comprehend. I do not anthropomorphize God into a man, for that spells out the arrogance of man and his quest to rule in the “personification”of God’s name. I acknowledge a higher power I do not and cannot understand in this state of temporal being, and that God is in fact everything we see, taste, touch, and feel. God is nature; and the mathematical perfection of nature and the golden proportion is proof of this to me. But still I do not say God is human, for this is naught but the teachings from the arrogance of men who seek to rule through impersonation of God and to justify their dastardly actions. In fact I would say only the arrogance of man allows him or her to think they would be able to perceive God. That said, belief is not the point, and is not a requirement. For on this earth there are 7 billion different versions of what God is. The reality of God is likely not even close to any of those 7 billion opinions. The reality is that if God exists, God would exist despite mine or your belief and despite the doctrines of over 1,000 corporate religions around the world. This is a humbling rational. It is logical and reasonable.

All you need to know for our purposes is that ALL LAW in this temporal realm of persons is based on the cannons, ecclesiastics, and Biblical scriptures, and is literally owned and copyrighted statute by the BAR and by the Vatican.. This, my friend, only a fool would deny due to evidential reality. Thus, the only way to step out from the power of a bunch of megalomaniacs who believe they rule under God’s name is to deny that authority by claiming a higher power than those men who claim to act in God’s name – which is indeed recognized in court. The teachings of Jesus Christ in the Bible and in the lost books of scripture have nothing to do with doctrinal corporate religion. They are guidelines to live without government and without congregational religion. Once you comprehend this, everything changes, and you suddenly realize that the organized corporate churches of all denominations are actually all standing against or anti-Christ… against Christ’s teachings.

Ultimately, if you do not comprehend this, that the source of authority in law is “God”, and if you refuse to legally acknowledge this fact, then literally by legal default you will remain forcibly ruled under and in the name of those who claim to rule in God’s name. It’s a delicious irony to be sure. And trust me when I say I only truly discovered this for myself within the last year and after many years of searching for this only remedy – for eventually all research and the quest for knowledge leads to this point. Perhaps most important to you is that your “opinion” about this whole religion thing was certainly taught to you as opposed to being gained by actual study and personal learning and enlightenment, and that there is a gigantic effort to hide what I am telling you now as there has always been in history. Your philosophy, as was mine, is likely that of the Illuminati “New Age” and Theosophist movements that I never realized had taken over everything mainstream, from music to media to religion, and is as was mine not your own. Not in a million years did I ever think I’d support “Christianity”, but now I understand everything else is there to entrap and enslave the mind. If you read just a few lines of the red letters of the Bible and apply those words to that of the legal language, you’ll quickly see that the character of Jesus did nothing but teach the natural law through allegory and was indeed the original non-pacifist outlaw.

All I can say is, once you see this, and you realize it has nothing to do with doctrinal religion, everything changes and you’ll never look back. You realize “God” is not mentioned as often as you think in the Bible, and that God is used just like the “Big Bang Theory” is used in science to explain the creation of the world and universe in the Genesis of the Bible. Other references to god and lord refer to the lord-god (man ruling as god, pope, king), that sin is against government (god), and that most of the concepts and words of the Bible are actually legal terms dealing with the landlord of man. It changes your whole perspective, and you begin to understand why this is the true gnostic knowledge.

One other note… the Catholic and other churches have been killing true “Christians” (free people) for centuries, and is vehemently opposed to this true nature and understanding. The church is anti-Christ’s teachings, which should be enough reason for anyone to look and see what it was that Christ actually spoke as the natural law to oppose the church. Only you can learn the truth by studying the words of Christ.

–=–
More To Learn

–=–

I realize without ego that I am at the beginning of this journey, cautiously learning and applying this remedy as I go. I invite you to join me at RepublicBroadcasting.org to learn as I do every Wednesday from 8-10 Eastern from Daniel, who only uses his Christian (first) name while rejecting in whole his surname (last name) as a corporate person. This series will be called “Christian Remedy In Law”. We are not selling anything, just trying to figure it all out for ourselves and help others achieve a state of free will and self-governance.

I will post each weeks show here below as we progress. We started yesterday, Feb 26th, 2014, even as the tyranny of government gains in exponential momentum…

–=–

————————————-
Show #1 – Meet Daniel:
————————————-

Download here: http://corporationnationradioarchives.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/show89_feb26.mp3

————————————————
Show #1 – Birth Into Bondage:
————————————————

Tune in Wednesday, March 5th!

http://republicbroadcasting.org/

.

–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Thursday, February 27th, 2014