Stop The Religion Of The Fed


–=–

–=–

I remember many years ago when I sent an email to James Corbett at the Corbett Report in Japan asking him for advice on how… well, how to become more like himself! I had respect and still do for Mr. Corbett’s apparently open-mindedness and willingness to report independently the news around the world despite what the popular opinion might be. His emailed response was in hind sight a perfectly reasonable and genuine one, short and to the point, which was to advise me to simply keep on doing what I was currently doing.

And I did…

Today, in appreciation of that advice, I wish to respectfully and publicly criticize Mr. Corbett’s grammar, logic, and rhetoric when it comes to the Federal Reserve System. Logic of course is simply another word for dialectic, and apparently the common but fallacious dialectic that the Fed is a completely private banking system separate from government is prominent in James’s grammar. This is of course understandable to an extent, considering that this appeal to popular opinion permeates the alternative consciousness while amazingly not a shred of evidence supports it. And without doing the proper due diligence, pain, and suffering of countless hours of research and contemplation, it would be much easier to just go with the flow and call the Fed the enemy, while submitting to the notion that the poor little legislature has no power whatsoever over the actions of the Fed…

I can certainly attest to this notion of the power of popular belief, for when I began showing on my blog and speaking out about the primary sources that state that the Fed was certainly in no way separated from the government or completely “private” in the way that was being portrayed, I was personally attacked for my efforts. Not with fact, but with fallacious rhetoric.

But, as James suggested, I should simply keep doing what I was doing. And so I tarried through the ad hominem attacks and kept on researching and writing.

I then came out against the false Libertarian hero of the alternative media and movement, Dr. Ron Paul, showing again through only primary sources that this false prophet was not to be trusted. I went through Paul’s “End The Fed Bill” as well as his so-called “Audit The Fed Bill” and showed them to be complete frauds and completely against the rhetoric of the End the Fed crowd in that, quite logically, (1) If government (congress) can vote to end the Fed, then logically the Fed necessarily must be a part of the government, which of course created it in the first place. And (2) the audit the fed bill does nothing to actually create a new audit of the Fed or to reveal anything that can’t already be found in the CAFR audit. For the bill only modifies one of the current audits – the audits that supposedly don’t exist in the first place. This was getting ridiculous!

And so I attempted to present these facts by asking why everyone is fallaciously yelling “Audit The Fed” when it is already audited, even while that this fact is clearly stated within Ron Paul’s Audit the Fed bill and showing that all these audits are accessible on the Fed’s own website. More attacks!

Next, I attempted to ask Ron Paul why he never talked about the actual auditing system of government, the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) system, for which the Federal Reserve was required to fulfill its obligation to. I blogged that Ron Paul “fans” need to tell Mr. Paul to not only talk openly about the CAFR (complete audit) of the Fed but to post it on his website so that his “fans” can see that the Fed is already audited and has been since its inception.

And my demands fell on deaf ears…

Instead, I received more fallacious ad hominem attacks, still insisting that the Fed is not audited, that it is completely independent with no strings attached, and that Ron Paul was somehow the savior Christ incarnate.

I quickly figured out that I wasn’t simply up against sheer ignorance, I was up against an institution of purposefully prescribed ignorance, complete with T-shirts, bumper stickers, talking points, sales and marketing tools, and of course Ron Paul’s book sales and propaganda team. For it was much easier to blame the Fed than to admit to ourselves that we have allowed our government to become a monopoly – government as banker extraordinaire – and that men like Ron Paul are a part of that syndicate. The truther/patriot mentality would not allow proper grammar into the fold, and therefore the illogical dialectic had evolved into a sheer propaganda nightmare of epic proportions.

Yet all this time the real audit of the Fed laid in wait for its chance in the sun… and still does.

And that seems to be where it lays today, as easily accessible as ever and just a click away from realization – 500 pages of shear fact that dispels every single patriot myth alive today. But those who deal in disinformation have built an empire upon keeping the facts hidden in lieu of fallacy, and so the T-shirt and book sales keep on truckin’ while the entire world economy suffers due to a government agency that pretends to be non-governmental with the blessings of government.

But, as they say, the proof is in the pudding. And so in taking with the advice of Mr. James Corbett, I am keeping on with my efforts and thus presenting the plain proof here today, with all due respect to James, for I still think he is one of the best reporters out there. But even the best can believe in unprovable lies sometimes, especially when they are spouted around like religion and protected by grammar-less protectorates and paid shills, garnering applause and false praise at their very mention. If there is one thing about James, it is that he often goes against the norm.

I choose to believe that James is simply ignorant of the facts, that he is still able to change his mind when those primary source facts are presented to him, and that he is not so vested in the audit the Fed lie that he is still willing to publicly retract the lie and stand in truth with me, for the benefit of all. After all, it was his advice and encouragement that lead me to this point of exposing the lie.

First, we must examine the words spoken by Mr. Corbett in his recent podcast.

 

The rhetorical false dialectic ad populum made here by Mr. Corbett, promoting the institution of ignorance, goes like this:

“And for of those who continue to puppet the Fed’s own line that, “well, we already audit ourselves, it’s ok,” ah, they should be aware of 31 U.S. Code Section 714 sub-paragraph B, which lays out all of the exemptions by which, ah, the Federal Reserve does not have to be audited for transactions with central banks or foreign governments, transactions, ah, involving anything to do with monetary policy decisions including discount window operations, reserves of member banks, securities credit, interest on deposits, and open market operations, the don’t aud- they are not audited for transactions made under the direction of the FOMC (Federal Open MarketCommittee), and they are not audited for communication among members of the board or employees of the Federal Reserve System. So, again, there’s all sorts of exemptions that this au- Audit The Fed ah- bill would- would eliminate, and it would also make sure that the results of the audit were made available to congress. So, those are significant steps.This is not an insignificant bill. It’s not an insignificant thing. It’s only a tiny baby step towards the way of dismantling and tearing apart the Federal Reserve beast, but it is progress of a sort, and it does let us get our foot in the door to get people aware of that bigger picture. So for people who are interested in that, and have people in their lives who still don’t understand the Federal Reserve, or why it should be opposed, may I humbly suggest my own documentary, “Century of Enslavement: History of the Federal Reserve,” to get people aware of the nature of this beast and why and how it must be dismantled.”

–=–

Now, in correction of these many fallacious comments, I wish to do the service of dispelling them with the primary sources and logical rhetoric based on those sources (proper grammar that is) while showing how James Corbett is so easily misled by the dialectical that has been set up to purposefully push him and other well-intended folks into that irrational thought process. And so let’s break down each logical fallacy as we break down each erroneous statement above.

I wish to disclaim here once again that I have the full respect and admiration for Mr. Corbett and that this is in no way intended to disparage his name or reputation for otherwise wonderful insight and reporting. But I will say that the facts provided here demand a retraction and restatement of the facts surrounding the Federal Reserve System to his “fans” so that, in the future, the correct course of action may be taken and so that ridiculous bills like that of Ron Paul’s Audit the Fed bill don’t continue to fool the masses into pointless distraction. As I have learned along the way, one must be responsible with their opinions, and I only respect those who may change their opinion even when they are invested in the lie with documentaries and past statements. The ego has no place in a movement designated with the word truth. And to forgive is divine…

–=–
The Reality
–=–

I have come to the conclusion after so many years of attempting disclosure of the facts that comprehension is not possible because of the religious-like faith and belief that even the most staunch activists have in their government. This seemingly unavoidable conditioning is ensured via the “waking up” process, which unerringly leads to shock jocks and disinfo agents selling the story. That is to say that there is a firm belief that the government and its creation, the Federal Reserve Board and System, are actually competing against each other; that government is somehow just another victim of the Federal Reserve. This holy misunderstanding creates the foundation for the dialectic (logic) which leads to false rhetoric and mythos about the Fed. And so we must be clear as we delve into reality that there is no real competition here and that government is all one entity, including it’s many “independent agencies”.

One of the most important Maxim’s of law is simply that the creator controls.

When applied to the Federal Reserve System, we can simply read the Federal Reserve Act (primary source) and come to no other conclusion than that the Federal Reserve Board and system was indeed created by Congress. Thus, it is patently incorrect to state that the Federal reserve is independent or separate from government, without first stating that such forms (titles) of independence and separation are only what Congress (the creator) allows in its statutes. Under no circumstances does the Fed act “outside of the law”, for in law the creator always controls.

Inversely, there stems confusion by the fact that the Federal Reserve Board is allowed by its creator to make its own rules.

Our Maxim’s of law also state that a fiction of law can make no law. In other words, the law-maker (congress) creates fictions of law, which in turn being creations (fictions) of law, have no power to make laws themselves. This is the role of the Federal Reserve.

–=–

“There is no fiction without law”

“Fictions arise from the law, and not law from fictions.”

–=–

Bouvier’s 1856 Dictionary of Law defines what a Fiction Of Law is:

FICTION OF LAW – The assumption that a certain thing is true, and which gives to a person or thing, a quality which is not natural to it, and establishes, consequently, a certain disposition, which, without the fiction, would be repugnant to reason and to truth. It is an order of things which does not exist, but which the law prescribe; or authorizes. It differs from presumption, because it establishes as true, something which is false; whereas presumption supplies the proof of something true…The law never feigns what is impossible – fictum est id quod factum non est sed fieri potuit. Fiction is like art; it imitates nature, but never disfigures it it aids truth, but it ought never to destroy it. It may well suppose that what was possible, but which is not, exists; but it will never feign that what was impossible, actually is. Fictions were invented by the Roman praetors, who, not possessing the power to abrogate the law, were nevertheless willing to derogate from it, under the pretense of doing equity. Fiction is the resource of weakness, which, in order to obtain its object, assumes as a fact, what is known to be contrary to truth: when the legislator desires to accomplish his object, he need not feign, he commands. Fictions of law owe their origin to the legislative usurpations of the bench. 4. It is said that every fiction must be framed according to the rules of law, and that every legal fiction must have equity for its object. To prevent, their evil effects, they are not allowed to be carried further than the reasons which introduced them necessarily require. The law abounds in fictions

–=–

The Federal Reserve is nothing more or less than a fiction of law – an association of persons incorporated within the law to act under the law. It deals in mostly imaginary currency (non-paper or coin) called credit, in a purely imaginary fictional realm. It is the banker in a pretend monopoly game. It is the creator of currency, which it thus controls via the powers and laws granted by Congress and the very limited independence that congress allows one of its own created corporations.

This independence is no different than the independence bestowed by the creator congress to the board of the Postal Service, the board of Social Security Administration (investment insurance scheme), or any other board of any other corporation or institution created by congress. They are all creatures of law, allowed to make their own rules to govern themselves in the absence of daily oversight by congress itself. It’s really quite simple and logical. Yet we are not bothered by the independence of say the the Post Office, while at the same time we would not expect to see a member of congress behind each Post Office desk in-taking letters and packages.

Why not? Stamps are also considered money, are they not?

According to its own data, The USPS employed 626,764 workers (as of January 2014) and operated 211,654 vehicles in 2013. So how do we think that the Post Office would exist without a certain bit of political independence from Congress?

There can’t be a congressman posted at every post office in America now can there?

This word independence has been tweaked and twisted by authors and radio shock jocks so as to mean something other than what it actually does in politics (fiction). But everything Congress creates is created with independence. And honestly unless this is the case, Congress would have no time to do anything but run its own creation.

From WhiteHouse.Gov we read:

“There are hundreds of federal agencies and commissions charged with handling such responsibilities as managing America’s space program, protecting its forests, and gathering intelligence. For a full listing of Federal Agencies, Departments, and Commissions, visit USA.gov.”

And from that link on USA.gov we read:

“The Federal Reserve is the central bank of the United States. It formulates and administers credit and monetary policy.”

The word of, in law, means “belonging to”. The popular or common concept of independence does not refer to ownership, only to operation.

The word policy is not law. Webster’s 1828 defines policy as “In common usage, the art, prudence or wisdom of individuals in the management of their private or social concerns… Stratagem; cunning; dexterity of management… Art, prudence, wisdom or dexterity in the management of public affairs; applied to persons governing. The word policy is used also for the writing which insures against other events, as well as against loss of property.”

Policies are simply the internal rules of the agency, not the laws of the United States. Only the legislature can create laws, and those laws govern the fictions created within, like the Federal Reserve System and Board. But the board is allowed to make some rules governing its institution, since congress cannot babysit every one of its created agencies. I’m sorry to say that there is nothing more to the word independence than that, and that there is really no conspiracy here at all, just normal governance through the creation of independent agencies of government to manage the affairs of government. So stop blaming the agencies of government for government’s actions. The creator controls!!!

Listed under that heading “independent agencies of government” is all of these agencies of government allowed to act independently under their boards and commissions, including the “Federal Reserve System”. And it gives the website (http://www.federalreserve.gov/) for more information, which is where the Federal Reserve CAFR and other audits are housed for public utilization.

To give you an idea of just how many independent agencies of government there are, here is just a partial selection of the listings starting with only the letter F. Notice that no special place is given to the Federal Reserve System, for it is simply just another of hundreds of associations that Congress creates to manage the affairs of the United States Corporation. Clicking on any of these independent agencies of government brings you to its prospective website, including the Federal Reserve.

–=–

Now, do you honestly take issue with this perfectly logical and reasonable list of independent agencies? Do you honestly think that the Congress with its 538 or so members could possibly run all of these agencies from the halls of congress? Is there a reason that you don’t hold up a sign, for instance, that says END THE FTA?

Understandably, the concept of ending what is the 5th plank of the Communist Manifesto – “Centralization of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with state capital and exclusive monopoly” – is a perfectly reasonable endeavor for a people that can only be described today as debt slaves to that system. However, while callously parading around such a notion in felt tip pen and cardboard, the thought of a replacement never seems to cause concern to most armchair activists. For the Fed is just part of the government, remember. So while the Fed system and banks might disappear, the central government remains perfectly intact, and still holds patent on the monopoly money. And the government has instituted all 10 planks of the communist manifesto by law, not just this one. And the other 9 planks don’t need the Federal Reserve to exist!

In fact, it is my own speculation that the collapse of the Federal Reserve would lead to one and only one thing – takeover by the world bank via loans and collateralization – which in my opinion is the goal of the government-bankers who run the Fed in the first place. Let the people believe they have defeated a small subsection of evil within the greater unseen evil by ending the Fed, and then watch helplessly as the United States is handed over to the United Nations and World Bank like every other nation, creating the ultimate manifestation of a world central bank; a bail-out like no other. But that’s merely my own opinion.

Back to the facts…

I present this information here for only one purpose, which is to show the reader that the conspiracy is not the independent agency, but the controller of that agency. For the agency has no power without its mother corporation. By promoting the patriot myth that these entities are separate in any other way than operationally creates a false dialectic that they are also in conflict or competition with each other. And in the stage-play of congressional hearings and meetings, we watch as this notion is played out for the benefit of the masses. But indeed, all they are doing is playing the parts assigned to them as agents (actors).

And here is the most important thing to contemplate…

The only reason that the chairman of the Federal Reserve can tell Congress “no” to the requests for information by Congress while in session is because the Congress voted on a bill to allow that power to the chairman.

These are nothing more than actors; agents of the government. By creating the appearance of competition and the tying of hands the illusion is set to make the audience believe the fictional tale being presented. Good guy vs. bad guy. Left vs. right. Democrat vs.Republican. House vs. Senate. Congress vs. Fed.

Its the classic rhetoric of organized crime. Many fingers of the same hand pretending to be different and opposing one another, all the while controlled by the same hand.

Ironically, if anything, the bill introduced by Ron Paul entitled “End The Fed”  stands as a very clear acknowledgement that Congress can end the fed (its own creation) at any time it wishes, through a simple vote. This is because of the fact that it is a federal agency of congress, and is its master no matter how much independence is bestowed upon it by its creator. And yet this simple logic is not acknowledged for some reason when speaking of the independence concept. But it shows that Congress the creator has ultimate power over what it created, including the invoking of the Fed’s immediate demise at the stroke of a pen. After all, the Fed is just a fiction of law, and therefore has no standing against law. This elegant truth stands as a perfect example of how a false dialectic (logic) has been built not from proper grammar, but from sheer word-of-mouth nonsense; usually from those selling products, storable food, gold and silver, and other commodities while using this fictional tale of independence and competition as its backbone of fear.

Well I have nothing to sell… And as history shows, it is usually the retail outfitters that supply goods and services that make out like bandits, not those searchers of the thing coveted or the cowards of the thing feared, and not the gold-diggers and hoarders of those goods. Strange, unreasonable, fear-based commerce indeed…

–=–
Breaking Down The Fallacies
–=–

Let us break down the fallacious statement by Mr. Corbett, piece by piece, by offering the opposing factual and primary information as its counter.

To start, let me provide you here with the primary resources that I referred to above, including the very long, full audit of the Federal Reserve called the Annual Report of the Board of Governors, otherwise known as the CAFR, as well as that of the individual banks – the audit of the Federal Reserve System and Banks:

From the Fed Board’s Website:

CAFR Annual Reports for the Board and the Individual Federal Reserve banks:

Federal Reserve Board CAFR (back to 1995) –> http://www.federalreserve.gov/publications/annual-report/default.htm

CAFR’s for individual banks –> http://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/bst_fedfinancials.htm

New York Fed Bank CAFR –> http://www.newyorkfed.org/aboutthefed/annualreports.html

Quarterly Reports on Balance Sheets –> http://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/quarterly-balance-sheet-developments-report.htm

For our purposes, we will use the most recent CAFR for fiscal year (fy) 2013.

You may also view my previous research articles here, thoroughly exposing this fraud, and presenting any facts not re-presented herein:

The Incontrovertible Conundrum Of Dr. Ron Paul –> https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2012/06/23/the-incontrovertible-conundrum-of-dr-ron-paul/

Today’s Creatures From Jekyll Island –> https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2012/09/01/todays-creatures-from-jekyll-island/

–=–

And so that there is no confusion here, the above links are for the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, which is the full audit of the Fed. This is not to be confused with the completely separate, purposefully incomplete and misleading GAO audit of the Comptroller General of the United States, which is the only subject of the Audit the Fed bills from Ron Paul and the current version spoken about above by Mr. Corbett. These two audits are completely different and separate from each other. They should not ever be confused as being the same audit report, except by the fact that both are requirements of the creator (Congress) and its prescribed laws. It is this false notion that is at the heart of the confusion. The Fed has no choice but to comply with those laws because it is a creation of that Congress and subservient to it.

Unfortunately, part of Mr. Corbett’s dialectic as presented is that the audit produced by Title 31, Section 714 is the only audit available, or at least the only one to take into consideration. Both of these notions are false. For the CAFR is just as available to the public as it is to Congress, and it has nothing to do wit Title 31, Section 714. The reality is that Congress, including former congressman Ron Paul and his son, purposefully ignore and remain silent about the full audit of the Fed – the CAFR. If I can link it to you here, do you honestly think it’s that hard to find by the Congress itself, who requires the Fed to create the CAFR under its own laws BUT NEVER SPEAKS OF IT IN CONGRESSIONAL SESSION?

As far as the actual act in question presented within the Audit The Fed bill(s), it only refers to the other incomplete audit of the GAO and not the CAFR. In regards to this seemingly strange notion, please understand that Congress passed this restrictive act – Title 31, Section 714 – the subject of the entirety of the “Audit The Fed” bill(s) – in the first place, in order to restrict itself!!! In other words, Congress itself limited the audit ability of the Comptroller General as it is reported to Congress. The average person reading this most likely thinks that the Federal Reserve is a rogue agency that refuses by its own will to allow its transactions listed within Title 31, Section 714 to be audited. But this is a congressional act! The Fed is simply obeying the law set out by congress when in high Hollywood fashion it refuses the information that Congress asks for. Congress already knows that the Fed will refuse it before it asks, because congress wrote the law that requires the Fed to with-hold that same information in the first place. This is a Hollywood production you fools!

To make this ever more clear, the audit is only done in the first place because it is required by congress. The Ron Paul campaign and Audit The Fed bill(s) only served to change a rule that Congress – not the Federal Reserve or the Comptroller General – already voted into law in 1978 – called the Federal Banking Agency Audit Act (TITLE 31, Section 714). The Fed has nothing to do with this fact and has no authority whatsoever to change or deny this law. In other words, it is Congress itself [the government corporation] that is currently keeping this information off of the Comptroller General’s audit to itself, and thus out of the realm of public or legislative disclosure within public sessions of congress. Understand this, and you understand controlled opposition politics and how the Untied States legislature runs as nothing but a Hollywood production and consensus gaining company.

Now I’m willing to bet that James Corbett has not read the very subject of his rhetoric, the comptroller’s audit itself. He certainly has not read or at least comprehended the Federal Reserve Act and the laws that very clearly require the audits. And finally, it is painfully obvious that Mr. Corbett has not even looked at the index of the CAFR report, since it shows each thing not allowed in the Comptroller’s audit to be audited in the CAFR.

Firstly, he states that the Fed “audits ourselves”, referring to myself apparently as a “puppet”. Big mistake, dude!

Here we go…

#1 The auditing process of the Fed works the same way as any other auditing process works in any other government or business. The Fed creates its financial statements, called the CAFR or annual report, and then and only then does an independent auditing firm get hired to audit the financial statements themselves. Thus, to call the unaudited financial statements an audit is not technically correct, and is just another misunderstanding by the patriot folks who do not actually read the audited reports. We call the finished product post-audit an audit report simply because the financial reports are thus audited. So this first fallacy is absolutely wrong, for the Fed statements are audited by an outside company.

In it’s letter of transmittal, the CAFR states:

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
Washington, D.C.
May 2013

The Speaker of the House of Representatives:

Pursuant to the requirements of section 10 of the Federal Reserve Act, I am pleased to submit the ninety-ninth
annual report of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

This report covers operations of the Board during calendar year 2012.

Sincerely,
Ben Bernanke
Chairman

–=–

Notice that this report is presented to the Speaker of the House! Are you really going to tell me now that the Congress doesn’t have access to the CAFR (annual report)? This is not the same audited report as the GOA audit, obviously, as we are reading here from page 4 (of the pdf) of the CAFR itself – not the GAO audit.

Also notice that this report is required by congress, the creator of the Federal Reserve Act as amended. This is not a choice!

We read in the CAFR:

Federal Reserve System Audits

The Board of Governors, the Federal Reserve Banks, and the Federal Reserve System as a whole are all subject to several levels of audit and review. The Board’s financial statements are audited annually by an outside auditor retained by the Board’s Office of Inspector General. The outside auditor also tests the Board’s compliance with certain laws and regulations affecting those statements.

The Reserve Banks’ financial statements are audited annually by an independent outside auditor retained by the Board of Governors. In addition, the Reserve Banks are subject to annual examination by the Board. As discussed in the chapter “Federal Reserve Banks,” the Board’s examination includes a wide range of ongoing oversight activities conducted on site and off site by staff of the Board’s Division of Reserve Bank Operations and Payment Systems.

The OIG also conducts audits, reviews, and investigations relating to the Board’s programs and operations as well as to Board functions delegated to the Reserve Banks, and Federal Reserve operations are also subject to review by the Government Accountability Office.

–=–

And on page 99 we read:

The Federal Reserve Board engaged Deloitte & Touche LLP (D&T) to audit the 2012 combined and individual financial statements of the Reserve Banks and those of the consolidated VIEs.15 In 2012, D&T also conducted audits of internal controls over financial reporting for each of the Reserve Banks,Maiden Lane LLC,Maiden Lane III LLC, and TALF LLC. Fees for D&T’s services totaled $7 million, of which $1 million was for the audits of the consolidated VIEs. To ensure auditor independence, the Board requires that D&T be independent in all matters relating to the audits. Specifically, D&T may not perform services for the Reserve Banks or others that would place it in a position of auditing its own work, making management decisions on behalf of the Reserve Banks, or in any other way impairing its audit independence. In 2012, the Banks did not engage D&T for any non-audit services. One Bank leases office space to D&T.”

–=–

And we can finally read about the very different and separate GAO audit on page 409, to see the origin and novelty of that separate and unrelated audit report:

Government Accountability Office Reviews

The Federal Banking Agency Audit Act (Pub. L. No. 95–320) authorizes the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to audit certain aspects of Federal Reserve System operations. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (Dodd-Frank Act) directs GAO to conduct additional audits with respect to these operations. Many of these Dodd-Frank-mandated audits have now been completed, but not all. In addition, the GAO has initiated its own review of financial regulators’ progress on implementing Dodd-Frank Act regulations.

In 2012, the GAO completed 21 projects that involved the Federal Reserve (table 1). Ten projects remained open as of December 31, 2012 (table 2). Some of the major projects that GAO has undertaken include a study of the Independent Foreclosure Review process; a review of Board and Reserve Bank offices of Minority and Women Inclusion and the diversity of the Federal Reserve System workforce; a review of enforcement of the Service members Civil Relief Act; and several studies on the costs and benefits associated with the implementation of the Dodd-Frank Act.

–=–

In point of fact, the GAO audit that is referred to in the Audit The Fed bills was never intended to be a full audit of the Fed system in the first place. It is a specific targeted audit of the items and transactions that the GAO is specifically looking for. It does not need a full audit for its purposes. If it did, then it would simply use the CAFR and save its auditors the trouble and expense of re-auditing the same exact thing over again. The GAO even refers readers to the CAFR (annual report) for the full financial audits!

In reference to these bills that would lift the constraints placed on the GAO’s audit authority over the Federal Reserve, Angell stated:

“The benefits, if any, of broadening the GAO’s authority into the areas of monetary policy and transactions with foreign official entities would be small.  With regard to purely financial audits, the Federal Reserve Act already requires that the Board conduct an annual financial examination of each Reserve Bank (CAFR)… The process of conducting financial audits is reviewed by a public accounting firm to confirm that the methods and techniques being employed are effective and that the program follows generally accepted auditing standards… Further, a private accounting firm audits the Board’s balance sheet… Finally, and more broadly, the Congress has, in effect, mandated its own review of monetary policy by requiring semiannual reports to Congress on monetary policy under the Full Employment and Balanced Growth Act of 1978… In addition, there is a vast and continuously updated body of literature and expert evaluation of U.S. monetary policy.  In this environment, the contribution that a GAO audit would make to the active public discussion of the conduct of monetary policy is not likely to outweigh the disadvantages of expanding GAO audit authority in this area.”

–=–

Mr. Corbett and so many others are simply victims of a slight of hand game. The various audits that take place within the Fed are stated clearly here, and yet the “Audit The Fed” bills always only refer to the single audit of the GAO, which is the least important audit of all with respect to the budgetary purposes of congress. For the GAO audit is meant to be specialized and incomplete by design!!!

No wonder the bill is not being passed. It’s just a redundancy of the CAFR! And again, the conspiracy is not within the Fed, it’s the government itself, and it will continue to play out these stage shows as long as you fall for their tricks. In fact, it would not surprise me at all if congress passes the bill simply to fool the End and Audit the Fed movement into believing they had a small victory. And the shock jocks and bumper-sticker suppliers will tout it as a big win, though nothing at all will become of it. Why? Because the audit is already there, and the congress ignores it already. LOL!

And so we now know that an audit is in fact done very much independently from the fed, making the true puppets in reality James Corbett and all others who puppet the notion that the Fed “audits itself”. This simply is not true, as shown above. The Fed does not audit itself any more than any other corporation out there. Instead it follows the legal process of auditing under the laws of the United States. I’m not here to suggest that this is a good or bad system, just to show how it works. Fallacy negated.

We also now know that the bill in question would not create any new audit, and would only serve to modify the already existing GAO audit, which in reality is just a redundancy, since the House receives a copy of the fully audited CAFR from the Board of Directors of the Fed – not by choice but by law of congress. And in that CAFR we can un-miraculously find everything missing from the GAO audit report…

One down, many fallacies to go…

#2 Mr. Corbett expresses the fact that as per U.S. Code Title 31, Section 714, and I quote “the Federal Reserve does not have to be audited for transactions with central banks or foreign governments, transactions, ah, involving anything to do with monetary policy decisions including discount window operations, reserves of member banks, securities credit, interest on deposits, and open market operations, they don’t aud- they are not audited for transactions made under the direction of the FOMC (Federal Open Market Committee), and they are not audited for communication among members of the board or employees of the Federal Reserve System.”

But is this an accurate statement?

No. Not at all. Unless you do as he has and limit yourself to just this one restricted report from the GAO, thus creating your own fallacious dialectic. And why not, that’s the point isn’t it? To obfuscate and restrict the information presented in the real audit (CAFR) so that the people don’t know about it? The CAFR is certainly inclusive of this information, and the above items and transactions are indeed audited within.

I suppose we could say he is correct that this information is kept out of just one of the redundant audits, the one referred to as the GOA audit. But the whole point I am trying to make here is that this is mere subterfuge, because the congress receives the CAFR too, making the GAO audit report absolutely pointless… unless it’s designed and used to confuse and obfuscate, which it has done to Mr. Corbett!

So let’s go to the index and Table of Contents and see what we can find in the 2013 CAFR that is apparently not allowed to be audited…

How about the open market committees? Apparently in the mythos these meetings are secret, according to the ridiculous Audit the Fed bill, and thus must be voted upon to be included in the GAO audit report.

But is this correct? Does this mean that the information is not audited elsewhere?

Did anyone bother to check the full audit, the CAFR, for any of this information? Surely it can’t be in there, can it?

Oh, wait a minute. In the table of contents its states the following:

Minutes of Federal Open Market Committee Meetings….. 123

Meeting Held on January 24–25, 2012 ………………………. 124
Meeting Held on March 13, 2012 ………………………………. 156
Meeting Held on April 24–25, 2012 …………………………… 166
Meeting Held on June 19–20, 2012 ……………………………. 191
Meeting Held on July 31–August 1, 2012 ……………………. 216
Meeting Held on September 12–13, 2012 ……………………. 227
Meeting Held on October 23–24, 2012 ……………………….. 251
Meeting Held on December 11–12, 2012 …………………….. 261

–=–

Well then… the actual minutes of the actual meetings of the Open Market Committee, presented right in the audited financial statements of government? It can’t be, according to the myth. But there it is. Why? Because the CAFR is the full audit of the Federal Reserve, and it is not restricted by Title 31, Section 714.

Just because Congress chooses to ignore the CAFR doesn’t mean it does not exist. And that goes for you too, Mr. Corbett.

So what else can we find in the CAFR that is “not allowed to be audited” in the GAO audit?

Let’s go to the index and see, shall we?

Here’s a list of things apparently “not allowed to be audited” right here, somehow audited in the CAFR:

Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC). See also: Open market operations

Annual organizational matters, 125–127
Appropriate monetary policy, 144, 150, 152, 181, 186,
188, 209, 213, 244, 248, 278, 281
Authorizations, 127–130
Consensus forecast, 225–226, 237
Domestic policy directives, 5–6
Forecast uncertainty, 155, 190, 215, 250, 285
Foreign currency operations and directives, 128–138
Meeting minutes, 123–285
Members, 416
Monetary policy strategies and communications, 44–48, 164–165, 167, 217
Notation votes, 140, 165, 176, 202, 226, 237, 260, 271
Officers, 416
Policy actions, 44–48, 138–140, 162–164, 173–176, 199–202, 223–225, 235–237, 258–260, 269–271
Policy compliance, 100
Responsibilities, 349–350
Statement on longer-run goals and strategy, 7
Summary of Economic Projections, 6, 47–48, 123, 140–154, 177–189, 203–214, 237–249, 272–284
System Open Market Account, 127–128, 150, 157, 167, 217–218, 253

Open market operations. See also Federal Open Market Committee

Open Market – Open Market Desk, 16–17, 41 ,46
Volume of transactions, 289–290

Securities credit, 74

Monetary policy

Alternative scenarios, 167
Communications, 164–165
Developments and outlook, 44–48
Expectations, 22–26, 38–39
Overview, 5–6, 180
Statement on longer-run goals and strategy, 7, 131–132

Monetary policy reports to Congress

February 2013, 5–26
July 2012, 27–48

Foreign currency operations:

Authorization, 128 –130
Denominated assets, 355–356, 372–374
Directives, 130
Liquidity swaps, 357, 374
Procedural instructions, 130–138
Foreign economies, 133–134, 158, 169, 195–196
etc…

Deposits

Depository institutions, 19–20, 359
Federal Reserve Banks, 295, 300–301, 359
Treasury, 359

Depository institutions

Deposits, 19–20, 359
Discount rates, 121–122
Reserve requirements, 292
Reserves of, 294–295, 298–301

Federal Reserve Banks

Accounting policies, 350–363
Assessments, 361
Assets and liabilities, 19–20, 294–295, 298–299
Audits, 319–341
Automated clearinghouse (ACH) services, 93
Balance sheets, 19–20, 41–42, 132, 150, 157, 167, 193,
217–218, 228, 253, 262
Branches, 293, 420–433
Capital, 348, 359
Cash-management services, 97
Collection services, 96–97
Commercial check collection service, 92–93
Commitments and contingencies, 395–396
Condition statements, 304–308, 346
Conferences, 434–435
Credit outstanding, 294–295, 298–301
Currency and coin operations and developments, 94–95
Deposits, 295, 359
Directors, 420–431
Economic growth projections, 141
Equipment and software, 393–395
Examinations, 53, 99–100
Fair value, 361–362
FedLine access to services, 98
Fedwire Funds Service, 93
Fedwire Securities Service, 93–94
Financial statements, 105–110, 342–407
Fiscal agency services, 95–97
Float, 94
Government depository services, 95–97
Income and expenses, 95, 100–101, 309–314, 347, 360, 405, 407
Information technology, 98–99
Interest rates on depository institutions loans, 292
Intraday credit, 97–98
Investments of consolidated VIEs, 102
Lending, 101–102
Loans and other credit extensions, 294, 296–297, 298–299, 363–368
National Settlement Service, 93
Notes outstanding, 20, 358–359
Officers, 316, 432–433
Open market transactions, 289–290
Operations, volume of, 315
Operations and services, 349–350
Payments services, 96
Postemployment benefits, 404
Postretirement benefits, 402–404
Premises, 102–104, 317, 358, 393–395
Priced services, 91–94
Recovery of direct and indirect costs, 91–92
Restructuring charges, 362, 405–406
Retail securities programs, 96
Retirement plans, 396–401
Risk management, 94
Salaries of officers and employees, 316 442 99th Annual Report | 2012
Securities holdings, 100–101, 291, 298–
Structure, 349
Supervisory information technology, 69
System OpenMarket Account holdings and loans, 100–102, 368–377
Taxes, 362
Thrift plans, 401
Treasury securities services, 95–96
Wholesale securities programs, 96

Foreign Assets Control, Office of (OFAC), 66

Foreign banks. See also specific banks by name

Deposits, 295, 300–301
Prudential standards, 50, 51, 111–112
Supervision of, 57–58
U.S. activities, 51, 58, 73

Foreign currency operations

Authorization, 128–130
Denominated assets, 355–356, 372–374
Directives, 130
Liquidity swaps, 357, 374
Procedural instructions, 130–138

Credit (i.e. Discount Window Operations)

Availability, 11–12, 14, 18, 159, 170, 172–173, 195, 231
Consumer credit, 31, 255, 265
Corporate, 14
Primary, 121–122
Risk, 383–385
Index 439
Seasonal, 121–122
Secondary, 121–122

–=–

Now, I could go on listing more and more detail from the index of the Fed audit, but I have provided here a place in the CAFR for each item that is supposedly “not allowed to be audited”. And so please do your due diligence, Mr. Corbett and all others, and stop fallaciously naming those of us who actually do the research and read the primary data as the “puppets”, when in fact the puppet is you, parroting patriot mythology based on no solid evidence at all.

As for your other demeaning rhetoric to “those who do not understand the nature of the beast that is the Federal Reserve System” like you supposedly do, I can only say that your ego is apparent here when in plain fact it should not be. Perhaps you need to be reminded about the difference between reporting “news” and having proper grammar to feed your rhetorical reporting?

In the end, Mr. Corbett, I have written this piece not to offend you (as you did generally to me with your referential parrot comment), or to harm your reputation. On the contrary, I am writing to you today in order that you would save your reputation with me, an admirer, who has caught you here with no clothes. I’m not only asking for but demanding a retraction of what I believe to be your own fallacious incomprehension of the Federal Reserve and its place among government and UNDER government control. I recognize you here as the victim, not the criminal, or so I hope. Just as I too fell for the lies and mythology without checking the cold hard facts not so long ago, I redeemed myself and suffered the blow-back by truly speaking to the reality of the Fed. But I took your advice after so many attacks and kept on doing what I was doing, and ironically our roads have diverged on this subject due to your advice and my diligent research. My goal is to inform our fellow man that this Fed story is a fraud, and at best a distraction into the notion of a false competitive dialectic by a completely corrupt government legislature. I simply ask that you be a beacon of what the so-called truth movement is supposed to be about by doing the right thing and exposing not only the truth about the Fed and these bogus bills, but to also confirm to your “fans” the very difficult admission that even the best and most respected of us can be fooled into a false dialectic – false logic and rhetoric caused by very well laid misinformation and false grammar. In short, I only ask that you tell the people, unlike Ron Paul has, that the CAFR is the audit of the Fed and of every other independent agency of government in existence (fiction), and to quit promoting the notion that an audit does not exist. For clearly the CAFR as revealed above and in my own research is the audit you seek. And this new bill will not change anything about this reality. And the audit of the Fed will continue as it always has…

With great respect and position comes great responsibility.

So do the right thing.

Retract immediately (or immediately after proper action in studying the grammar provided here) the fallacious rhetoric you have helped to spread about the Fed as I have, and encourage others to do the same. Be what you are meant to be, James.

Or… Somehow prove me to be in error! For the burden of proof has been fulfilled on my end in triplicate here today.

Signed, with all due respect,

The Anti-Puppet.

.

–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Monday, October 27th, 2014

Advertisements

Federal Reserve Pays Treasury $75 Billion In Profit


It’s a truly sad reality that this headline sparks such a range of emotions in readers, from doubt to confusion… surprise to melancholy.

This information is no big secret. It’s not even hidden (maybe in plain sight). It’s just the typical operations of the Federal Reserve System as reported in its annual audit called the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR).

For those actually interested in seeking the truth about this federal agency, here is the link to the Board of Governors CAFR for 2011, the latest audit of the Fed. In fact, its the 98th audit of the Fed. It explains how everything operates, its foreign investments and foreign currency swaps and schemes, its many separate limited liability corporate holdings like Maiden Lane, its dealings and bailouts with AIG, Bears Stearns, and JP Morgan, and of course its assets and liabilities balance sheet.

Link –> http://www.federalreserve.gov/publications/annual-report/default.htm

Within this 479 pages of dry and boring financial reporting is a full description of the Fed’s operations, including the basic financial happenings of each individual reserve bank. Yeah, I know, it doesn’t have the flair of a good “Secrets of the Temple” or “Creatures” type of novel, but its got all the actual facts and figures from TARP to SOMA. Why? Because this is what is required by federal law.

If you want to know about the Fed, read the CAFR.

If you want to know about your city, read the CAFR.

If you want to know about your county, state, district, or any other governmental agency or corporation, read the CAFR.

Here are a few highlights:

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
Washington, D.C.
May 2012

To: The Speaker of the House of Representatives:

Pursuant to the requirements of section 10 of the Federal Reserve Act, I am pleased to submit the ninety-eighth annual report of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. This report covers operations of the Board during calendar year 2011.

Sincerely,

Ben Bernanke
Chairman

(Page 73)

On March 22, the Federal Reserve System released audited financial statements for 2010 for the combined Federal Reserve Banks, the 12 individual Reserve Banks, the limited liability companies that were created to respond to strains in financial markets, and the Board of Governors. The Reserve Banks reported comprehensive income of close to $82 billion for the year ending December 31, 2010, an increase of $28 billion from 2009.

(Page 384)

r. Interest on Federal Reserve Notes

The Board of Governors requires the Reserve Banks to transfer excess earnings to the Treasury as interest on Federal Reserve notes after providing for the costs of operations, payment of dividends, and reservation of an amount necessary to equate surplus with capital paid-in. This amount is reported as “Payments to Treasury as interest on Federal Reserve notes” in the Combined Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income. The amount due to the Treasury is reported as “Accrued interest on Federal Reserve notes” in the Combined Statements of Condition.

If earnings during the year are not sufficient to provide for the costs of operations, payment of dividends, and equating surplus and capital paid-in, payments to the Treasury are suspended. A deferred asset is recorded that represents the amount of net earnings a Reserve Bank will need to realize before remittances to the Treasury resume. This deferred asset is periodically reviewed for impairment.

(Page 144)

Income and Expenses

Table 4 summarizes the income, expenses, and distributions of net earnings of the Reserve Banks for 2011 and 2010. Income in 2011 was $85,241 million, compared with $79,301 million in 2010.

(Note: $85,241 million is $85.241 billion, and is written as $85,241,000,000 – the word million means to add six 0’s)

Distributions to the U.S. Treasury in the form of interest on Federal Reserve notes totaled $75,424 million (75.4 billion) in 2011. The distributions equal comprehensive income after the deduction of dividends paid and the amount necessary to equate the Reserve Banks’ surplus to paid-in capital.

Table 4. Income, Expenses, and Distribution of Net Earnings of the Federal Reserve Banks, 2011 and 2010

Distributions to U.S. Treasury (interest on Federal Reserve Notes):

$75,424,000,000 in 2011

$79,268,000,000 in 2010

(Page 325)

Table 9A. Statement of Condition of the Federal Reserve Banks, by Bank, December 31, 2011 and 2010

Interest on Federal Reserve notes due to U.S. Treasury (note 13): listed as total and by individual bank

Note 13 – Represents the estimated weekly remittances to U.S. Treasury as interest on Federal Reserve notes or, in those cases where the Reserve Bank’s net earnings are not sufficient to equate surplus to capital paid-in, the deferred asset for interest on Federal Reserve notes. The amounts on this line are calculated in accordance with Board of Governors policy, which requires the Federal Reserve Banks to remit residual earnings to the U.S. Treasury as interest on Federal Reserve notes after providing for the costs of operations, payment of dividends, and the amount necessary to equate surplus with capital paid-in.

Payments to U.S. Treasury (interest on Federal Reserve notes) $75,423,597,000

(Page 333)

Table 11. Income and expenses of the Federal Reserve Banks, 1914–2011

Distributions to the U.S. Treasury – Interest on Federal Reserve notes:

Total for all years (1914-2011): $842,337,007,000

Total income all years (1914-2011): $1,013,516,673,000

(Translation: over 80% of the Fed’s income is transferred right back to the U.S. Treasury.)

In addition…

$44,113,958,000 – Represents transfers made as a franchise tax from 1917 through 1932; transfers made under section 13b of the Federal Reserve Act from 1935 through 1947; and transfers made under section 7 of the Federal Reserve Act for 1996 and 1997.

(Page 365)

Federal Reserve Banks Combined Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010

Distribution of comprehensive income:

Dividends paid to member banks: $1,577,000,000

Payments to Treasury as interest on Federal Reserve notes $75,424,000,000

Total distribution 2011 = $77,376,000,000

–=–

While it is true that national and state banks certainly get some great benefits by forcibly being members of the central government’s Federal Reserve, those benefits are nothing but the statutory ones granted to them as members. Obviously, the real profiteer here is the Treasury of the United States Federal Government, as these figures have shown us. The dividends paid to member banks are peanuts compared to the “interest” paid to the Treasury.

But still the fallacy persists that the Fed is not beholden to the U.S. government.

For those who still insist that the “bankers” somehow own the Federal Reserve, again, for God’s sake, please just read the Federal reserve Act and especially the CAFR:

p. Capital Paid-in

The Federal Reserve Act requires that each member bank subscribe to the capital stock of the Reserve Bank in an amount equal to 6 percent of the capital and surplus of the member bank. These shares are nonvoting, with a par value of $100, and may not be transferred or hypothecated. As a member bank’s capital and surplus changes, its holdings of Reserve Bank stock must be adjusted. Currently, only one-half of the subscription is paid in and the remainder is subject to call. A member bank is liable for Reserve Bank liabilities up to twice the par value of stock subscribed by it.

By law, each Reserve Bank is required to pay each member bank an annual dividend of 6 percent on the paid-in capital stock. This cumulative dividend is paid semiannually. To meet the Federal Reserve Act requirement that annual dividends be deducted from net earnings, dividends are presented as a distribution of comprehensive income in the Combined Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income.

This “non-voting” stock is not a choice, but a requirement to be a member and have the privilege of being in this organized crime syndicate of banks called the Federal Reserve System. It simply allows member banks to “print” money where none existed before.

The so-called “bail-outs”, for instance, weren’t in the form of a taxpayer loan or bond to these member banks, it was simply the act of the Federal Reserve allowing certain favored member banks the one-time privilege to actually print money without loaning it out. You don’t join the Federal Reserve system because you want to be a member, you join because you have no choice.

–=–

There are so many more questions that can be answered in this CAFR, but only if you really want to know the answers.

To most, the promoted fictions, fallacies, and fairy tails about the Fed are much easier to entertain than the 479 pages of shear agonizing and sleep-inducing truth that lay within these audited financial statements of the Federal Reserve. And for a lone researcher like myself, it pains me to watch the daily feeding frenzy of misinformation surrounding this investment and currency scam, where inaccuracy and downright fiction rule over any comprehension of what the Fed really is, what it does, and who its master is.

.

–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Tuesday, October 15th, 2013

A Pictorial History Of The World’s Governments


Due to the overwhelming popularity of A Pictorial History Of The United States Government (LINK) I thought it prudent to present a pictorial and historical escapade into the infection of the rest of the world by this tiny but powerful bloodline minority. For until we can see, all of our cultures and heritages shall continue to be perverted and uniformly eroded as planned and foretold for centuries.

Please note that this more advanced essay is an integral part to the comprehension of my upcoming multi-part series on the founding of the United States and its Constitution – the Masonic origins of America – and why the fervent desire to build and support Israel (Zionsim) at all costs is so prevalent in our collective set of world leaders. Today’s presentation includes photos, quotes, and my own commentary to help put the puzzle pieces of the past together in their proper historical perspective so as to understand the collective disposition of the unorganized masses of people of the world under this unified international foe.

In the end, after weeks of careful assembly, you will certainly realize an undeniable and inconvenient truth about our world, who promotes war and pestilence for profit, and what controls most nations.

This time from A to Z: 100 pictures are indeed worth 10,000 words…

–=–

File:WJC meeting with Argentine President Cristina Kirchner.jpg
Argentina – World Jewish Congress leaders meet with Argentine
President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner in Buenos Aires, June 2008


Australia – Prime Minister Julia Gillard


President Heydar Alyev


Belgium – Prime Minister Yves Leterme
receives a compass called the ‘Navigator of Jerusalem’,
from European Jewish Congress President Moshe Kantor

File:Interreligious-Meeting - Mustafa Ceric - Herman Van-Rompuy-Marc-Schneier - Abdujalil Sajid - Brussels 2010.jpg
– Bosnia –
First Gathering of European Muslim and Jewish leaders in Brussels, December 2010 –
Grand Mufti Mustafa Ceric – European Council President Herman Van-Rompuy –
Rabbi Marc-Schneier – Imam Dr. Abdujalil Sajid


Brazil – President Lula (Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva)


Brazil – President Lula (Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva)
at the “holocaust” centre Yad Vashem, Israel


Brazil – (above) President Lula with Chabad members
(below) blowing the Ram’s Horn

https://i0.wp.com/w3.chabad.org/media/images/483/Xlgv4834050.jpg
Brazil –  first female president Dilma Rousseff, before the election


Canada – Prime Minister Stephen Harper


Canada – Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird, at Kfar Chabad


Canada – Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird

Photo: Thank you to everyone who came out tonight to the Jewish Heritage Month reception at Queen's Park!
Canada – MPP Mike Colle hosting Jewish Heritage Month at Queen’s Park –
OJA (Ontario Jewish Archives) of UJA- (United Jewish Appeal)


MPP Monte Kwinter, MPP Peter Shurman, MPP Mike Colle,
Councillor James Pasternak – at Lipa Green Centre for UJA


Councillor James Pasternak, Associate Director, Ontario Government Relations
At the Lipa Green Centre – The Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs (CIJA)

Infection on all levels…


Regional Councillor Rosati, Councillor Sheffman, Mayor Maurizio Bevilacqua,
Councillor DeFrancesca and Regional Councillor Michael DiBiase
Ontario Jewish Heritage Month — at Lipa Green Centre.


United Jewish Appeal campaign booklet, 1947,
For: “restoration of Palestine” and “resettlement in Canada”

https://i2.wp.com/www.loc.gov/exhibits/haventohome/images/hh0165s.jpg
United Jewish Appeal
Propaganda for support of refugee Jews in Europe and Palestine

Photo: Happy Victoria Day! We hope you are enjoying the long weekend. Although the OJA does not have any photographs of Queen Victoria, we have the next best thing: a photo of her great great granddaughter Queen Elizabeth II. Queen Elizabeth was in town for the dedication of the Mount Sinai Hospital in 1973.</p> <p>Monty Simmonds, Q.C., with Her Majesty the Queen Elizabeth II, Prince Philip and Bert Gerstein on the dedication of Mount Sinai Hospital, 600 University Ave., Toronto, 1973, OJA, photo #3675.
Queen Elizabeth II, Prince Philip, Monty Simmonds, Q.C, and Bert Gerstein
dedication of Mount Sinai Hospital, 600 University Ave., Toronto, Canada, 1973
–Ontario Jewish Archives (OJA), photo #3675.


Montreal, Canada – Mayor Michael Applebaum

“I am going to put my energies into my defense and into my family,”
Applebaum, who insists he is innocent, said.
“This is why I am resigning as mayor of Montreal –
it is the responsible thing to do,” he stressed.

Applebaum’s platform as Mayor was a promise to
“clean up Montreal’s culture of corruption”.

Not so ironically, this Jewish politician was recently charged with corruption in office!

–=–


Costa Rica – President Oscar Arias in Israel


Denmark – former Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen
(here as Secretary General of NATO)
with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu

–=–
The Crown Temple
And The United Kingdom Of Jerusalem
–=–

http://www.jpost.com/HttpHandlers/ShowImage.ashx?ID=10089
Great Britain – Queen Elizabeth

https://i2.wp.com/w3.chabad.org/media/images/354/NcRD3541928.jpg
Great Britain – Queen Elizabeth
This was the one person she knew not to shake hands with


Great Britain – Queen Elizabeth

Britain's Ambassador to Israel Matthew Gould and President Shimon Peres toast Queen Elizabeth II at an event marking her Diamond Jubilee (photo credit: Roni Schutzer/Flash90)
Britain’s Ambassador to Israel Matthew Gould with President Shimon Peres
toasting Queen Elizabeth II on her Diamond Jubilee…

“(the) president is one of few people who can match the monarch in uniting people”

–=–

Video: Queen Elizabeth II knights Israel President Shimon Peres

–=–

http://i1.wp.com/www.loonwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/prince_charles_yarmulke.jpg?resize=183%2C250
Prince Charles of Wales, regent to the British crown


Prince Charles of Wales


Winston Churchill with Bernard Baruch, the leader of Israel, in 1961.
–Library of Congress


“The late Prime Minister’s bronze image now looks out from the
Montefiore Gardens over the Tower of David to Jerusalem’s Old City,
which he first visited in 1921 with Lawrence of Arabia.”

Nir Barkat, Mayor of Jerusalem claimed the Second World War leader
as a champion for Jerusalem and Israel at the ceremony,
which was attended by Randolph Churchill, the prime minister’s
great grandson, and British Ambassador Mathew Gould.”

–=–

“During times like these, when the free world is faced with the threat of a nuclear
Iran and global terrorism, it is important to preserve Churchill’s legacy, having
led the world to victory against the Nazi tyrant, in Jerusalem,
the city of peace of freedom…”

–Isaac Herzog, a Labor MK who led the statue’s installation to Israel Hayom.

(Never mind that Israel is one of only three nuclear armed nations that
refused to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, for which Iran did sign)

–=–


Great Britain (U.K.) Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher
“The first British PM to visit Israel while in office”
In Israel with Golda Meir during her visit to Israel in 1976


Margaret Thatcher with Israel President Shimon Peres


Margaret Thatcher and Israeli President Yitzhak Shamir


With Israeli Minister of Industry and Trade Ariel Sharon in Jerusalem, May 1986


With Netanyahu


Thatcher with Menachem Begen

–=–
Death Of The Iron Lady
–=–

Excerpt from Israel’s Technion website (http://pard.technion.ac.il/technion-honors-baroness-margaret-thatcher/):

It is with sadness that the Technion – Israel Institute of Technology heard of the passing away of Britain’s former Prime Minister Baroness Margaret Thatcher. Thatcher was a keen friend and supporter of the Technion and had a sharp insight into the importance of the institute for the region and the world.

On Nov. 2nd 1989, Prime Minister Thatcher received an Honorary Doctorate from Technion President Dr Max Reis “in recognition of her life-long involvement in and passion for science and technology; her exceptional statesmanship in British and world affairs; and in gratitude for her friendship to the State of Israel.” The ceremony took place in Whitehall.

The proceeds of the function made possible the Margaret Thatcher Centre for Computational Chemistry

Below is the acceptance speech of Baroness Thatcher.

Sir Evelyn, Mr. Galil, [Immanuel Jakobovits] Chief Rabbi, your excellency, my lords, ladies and gentlemen.

Thank you for the very great honour you do me, — first by making me an honorary doctor of technical sciences of the Technion university and, — second, by naming the centre for computational chemistry at the university after me…

https://i0.wp.com/pard.technion.ac.il/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/thatcherwear.jpg

De Beers is the Jewish Zionist  Rothschild funded mining empire of Cecil Rhodes.

–=–

“Common sense tells us that the only way to increase the value
of diamonds is to make them scarce, that is to reduce production.”

—Cecil Rhodes, founder of De Beers Mining, who received funding
and for which De Beers is now owned by the founding Zionist ROTHSCHILD FAMILY.

“Our only risk is the sudden discovery of new mines, which
human nature will work recklessly to the detriment of us all.”

—Cecil Rhodes, founder of De Beers Mining

Surprise! Diamonds are all but worthless! The goy can be made to covet any rock or mineral by the manipulative international Jew. They control the markets, production, and pricing of shiny rocks. False scarcity has made gold king, silver queen, and turned the people into greedy debt slaves who have traded their freedom and physical wealth for fiat paper – all to buy jewelry!

–=–


If it were a snake it would have bit you…
For Americans, every dollar we spend not only supports Israel
but also has an embossed Star of David stamped on every note!


The Orion-tation Of Money

The EURion (Orion) Constellation is on most world currencies as a
“security feature”. It is in the shape of a “Z”.


“EURion Constelation” symbols are a counterfeiting measure where each zero
lines up by integer ratios between the squared distances of nearby circles,
shaped as the Orion constellation. This pattern is detected by image-processing software,
which causes the program to refuse to print the document. The Great pyramids
aligned to this Orion-tation (SE) and is very important in masonic custom.

This Orion security feature is now as international as the Zionist influence
that created it, with the all major central banks of the world utilizing it as a
digital watermark on their currencies. The International bankers are the
International bloodline – organized crime extraordinaire.

If currency represents sovereignty, then sovereignty no longer truly exists in this world.

–=–

Margaret Thatcher is also quoted from above as saying:

“Technion’s reputation extends far, far beyond the borders of Israel.
Technion’s work in every field – medicine, science, architecture –
is synonymous with the creation of the modern state of Israel.”

–=–

Upon the death of Margaret Thatcher, the Jewish Press in April 2013 revealed the true history of her treachery to her ridiculously loyal subjects:

“…it was Thatcher’s embrace of British Jews and insistent promotion of Jews in her Conservative Party that inspired an outpouring of tributes from Jewish and Israeli leaders following her death Monday at 87…

For the country’s Jews, however, her naming of several of their number to Cabinet positions and her determined pushback against anti-Jewish grumbling among the Conservative Party’s backbenchers made what once was unimaginable: the possibility of a Jewish prime minister.

Lady Thatcher was always extremely supportive and admiring of the ethos of the British Jewish community,” Vivian Wineman, the president of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, told JTA.

Wineman said the mutual admiration was rooted in personal history. In the 1930s, Thatcher’s family took in an Austrian Jewish refugee. In 1959, Thatcher was elected to Parliament representing Finchley, a north London constituency with a large Jewish population.

She counted a number of Jews among her closest advisers and confidants, and at one point nearly a quarter of her Cabinet were of Jewish origins,” Wineman said.

Moshe Maor, a Hebrew University political science professor whose expertise is Britain, said Thatcher admired the British Jewish community’s self-reliance, an ethos she embraced as she dedicated herself to weaning Britons off public assistance.

“Thatcher admired hard work, and the Jewish community was not dependent on the state,” Maor said. “It was structured in such a way that Jews help others in their community. That was the culture Thatcher tried to advance.”

It was one also embraced by Britain’s late chief rabbi, Immanuel Jakobovits, whom Thatcher elevated to the House of Lords. Frustrated by protests among Christian leaders of the rapid pace of her economic reforms, she increasingly turned for spiritual reinforcement to Jakobovits, who became widely known as “Thatcher’s rabbi.”

Thatcher’s rule coincided with social changes among the country’s 350,000 Jews. Once proudly working class, British Jews by the 1980s had become increasingly middle class, more likely to be self-employed and alarmed at the leftward lurch of the leadership in the Labor Party.

“She got on quite well with Jews,” Wineman said. “She said once that she thought she probably had more constituents in Tel Aviv than in Finchley.”

Thatcher never hesitated to advance the careers of talented young Jews in her party – among them Leon Brittan, a secretary of trade; Nigel Lawson, a chancellor of the exchequer; Edwina Currie, a health minister; Malcolm Rifkind, a secretary of state for Scotland; and Michael Howard, a secretary of employment.

Rifkind went on to become foreign minister. Howard became home secretary and then opposition leader, burying forever the notion that a British leader had to come from the country’s official faith, Anglicanism.

Thatcher’s embrace of the Jewish community did not make its romance with the Tories a permanent one. Tony Blair’s purges of the Labor left after his 1997 election helped draw back some Jewish voters. But Howard’s precedent helped set the stage for ascension of the current leader of the Labor Party, Ed Miliband, the son of Polish Jewish immigrants.

Thatcher also earned kudos for her robust foreign policy and maintaining strong ties with Israel at a time of tension between the Jewish state and other European nations. “She was truly a great leader, a woman of principle, of determination, of conviction, of strength; a woman of greatness,” Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a statement Monday. “She was a staunch friend of Israel and the Jewish people. She inspired a generation of political leaders.”

Source–> http://www.jewishpress.com/news/europe/thatcher-remembered-for-befriending-uk-jews-and-maintaining-strong-ties-with-israel/2013/04/10/

–=–
Establishing Socialism
Through Multiculturalism

–=–

This is the world-wide phenomenon of how, as the above article states, “the unimaginable” election of “Jews” to offices of high authority is now commonplace, especially in predominantly Christian and Muslim countries. Just as in Germany, the Jewish immigrants have taken hold of, culturally infiltrated and tainted, and financially advanced themselves on the backs of societies and majority races across the world. And this is how the governments of the world have been infected.

This article even rubs this corruption and subversion in the face of the British, referring to “anti-Jewish grumbling among the Conservative Party’s backbenchers in other words the actual majority race of British men for whom the international Jews have made insignificant in their own country; just as in the United States and around the nations of the world for all non-Jewish majority cultures and races (goy).

In short, the people no longer have representation…

And this is how “multiculturalism” is being used around the world as a tool for the cultural destruction of significance for all races who have inhabited those countries for 1,000’s of years. For the international Jew must break a nation of its cultural and racial identity before it can corrupt that culture with its own. And to do this, the international Jew must take over the governments of all cultures. This devious plan is implemented in many forms, from “civil rights” to “equal rights”, “naturalization” to “illegal immigration”; “equal opportunity” to the “right of return”, “affirmative action” to “hate crimes”, and in countless other cultural countermeasures that seem glorious and revolutionary.

But what is a revolution, really?

Revolution:

A: a sudden, radical, or complete change.

B: a fundamental change in political organization; especially:
the overthrow or renunciation of one government or ruler
and the substitution of another by the governed.

C: activity or movement designed to effect fundamental
changes in the socioeconomic situation.

D: a fundamental change in the way of thinking about or visualizing
something : a change of paradigm <the Copernican revolution>

We must always remember an inconvenient truth… subjection to law requires consequence and force. This should be understood now more than ever, as nearly all nations of the world have been usurped by international Zionists hell-bent on supporting the re-built Kingdom/State of Israel. You may call them the Ashkenazim or “the Jews” – or those who claim to be but are not Jews. You may call them the Edomites or the Synagogue of Satan. You may call them the Freemasons or the Illuminati. You may call them the Royal bloodlines. But there is no real difference. For all of these pseudonyms have but one final and fundamental purpose in their combined doctrines – to reclaim the Kingdom of Jerusalem (Israel) and rebuild the Temple of Solomon (the 3rd Temple of Ezekiel). The blood is the same. The more you blame just one of these groups instead of all of them together as one blood-force, the more their deeds and usurpation go unseen and unpunished. Truly, a revolution of fundamental change in the way we think in America has already happened, brought on by a fundamental change in political organization by international Zionist infiltration, and this is currently well on its way to having the effect of fundamentally changing our socioeconomic situation in every nation. The people are but following their leaders, never suspecting that this bloodline revolution of leadership had already happened before the people who elected them were even born.

This change (revolution) has not been sudden but incremental, as the Talmud and Protocols demand, though quite radical and very closely complete, so as to be virtually unseen like the growing grass. And it has risen up so high that tradition and culture have been usurped and hidden by the tall infection of weeds.

–=–
Constructing An International
Culture Of  Non-Identity

–=–

“The union which we desire to found will not be a French, English,
Irish,
or German union, but a Jewish one, a Universal one!
Other peoples and races are divided into nationalities;
we alone have no co-citizens, but exclusively co-religionaries…”.
“The day is not distant when all the riches and treasures of the
earth
will become the property of the Children of Israel”.

–The Morning Post of London, on Sept. 6, 1920,
by James Rothschild III: Manifesto to all the Jews of the Universe

–=–

https://i0.wp.com/eyeswideblind.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/Racist-Flag.bmpIt is important to note that the “context” of this particular quote is disputed by Zionist
apologists as a mistranslation of a non-public speech. Of course, 100’s of even more horrific
and racist quotes that litter the Talmud and other rabbinical writings in black
and white are also said by Jews to be contextual and misunderstood by the goy.

–=–

It is purely a logical fallacy to consider the forced intermingling of cultures as in any way good. This ridiculous fallacy is that in order to protect pure blood cultures (majorities and minorities), multiculturalism and interbreeding between those races must be a protected and in some countries even a forced privilege (as we will see below). Cross-race marriage is the poster-child of equality and civil rights issues. Without the Jewish/Masonic concept of political equal rights as a political legal status (a fraternal brotherhood of “citizens”), the minority international Jew would never have been able to corrupt and subvert the majority races by taking seats in their governments. And so the “spread of democracy” continues across the globe through war and oppression (law through force), so that all people become equal under government law (equally enslaved by the privilege of law). In this way, the people can be tricked into “democratically electing” a Jewish/Masonic friendly (Zionist) government against the best interests of all people – a single supremest minority ruling the majorities in most countries of the world. If you control the majority with media brainwashing and propaganda, then you can manipulate public opinion and guide that majority to vote for a minority to represent the majority against its interests. This is madness… and this is the way of the international Jew and of the “United Nations” of the world.

So riddle me this… how does cross-race (multicultural) procreation support or preserve one single race and culture? Isn’t this what we are taught by our Zionist government and media? Isn’t this an oxymoron?

Yet in the international Jewish society of all infiltrated nations, it is absolutely forbidden (with devious exceptions) for such marriages between Jews and non-Jews according to the Jewish Talmud and Torah! The royal bloodlines have been interbreeding for many centuries before Christ. Their whole “religion”, eminence, cultural status, and nobility in society and government is based on pure blood. And the negative (Rh-) and positive (Rh+) blood types do not mix well, often causing birth issues via interbreeding from the two bloods rejecting each other. In other words, while the international Zionist governments are passing laws protecting the infiltration and intermarriage of cultures and races into such countries as France, Germany, United States, and Great Britain with its United Kingdom, breaking 1,000’s of years of the proud racial heritage and heredity of those people, the State of Israel and Zionist international Jewry remains pure blood and generally forbids marriage to non-Jews (non-Jewish blood). Even the royal kings and queens must advocate their thrown for this crime of interbreeding with “commoner” blood. When King Edward advocated his throne due to marriage of a Catholic in 1936, he resigned that throne for his future decedents of that tainted marriage as well…

“I, Edward the Eighth of Great Britain, Ireland, and the British Dominions beyond the Seas, King, Emperor of India, do hereby declare my irrevocable determination to renounce the throne for myself and for my descendants, and my desire that effect should be given to the instrument of abdication immediately…”

(Signed) Edward R.I.

What better way to protect the Edomite race and bloodlines than to force racial equality and mingling in every nation – with the exception of their own – until no proud racial majority, cultural ideal, or moral force is left to oppose you?

–=–

–=–


It is indeed ironic that those Jews who were hunted and loathed yesteryear as illegal immigrants in England are today promoting multicultural immigration in all forms to all countries except in their own xenophobic Meca, Israel, which the United Kingdom all but conquered militarily and created for them through treatise and bloodshed.

Now if this sounds “racist” or “prejudiced” to you, you better take off your rose-colored glasses and pay attention. For the ultimate in racist people are ruling you, infiltrating your cultures, and destroying your family unit in favor of their own “race”. This is not a white issue, for white is not a race – and “white” people of European descent have been blamed unilaterally for the actions of this tiny minority of white-skinned Edomites. It was the Jew who created this fallacy, with the German peoples as its poster child. They suck out all culture and values through that little box in your home called a television, for they are CEO’s of all mainstream media outlets. They are the self-proclaimed master race. And if racism is the appreciation and the study of unique races, what happens when there are only two races left to study – the Jew and the diversely molded mixed-slave-race?

–=–

The 12 step program, or how to usurp a nation and its identity:

Step 1 – Immigrate and infiltrate religious, social, and political constructs.

Step 2 – Set up usurious business practices and promote them as normal; create patriotic catchphrases like “free trade”, “free market”, and “capitalism” as you funnel public funds into your corporate usury-based businesses. Replace natural laws with contracts, duty with forced obligations, and natural rights with political privileges and benefits.

Step 3 – Demand equal rights (protections) under law, not natural or earned ones, and subsume all property as State-owned.

Step 4 – Gain international appeal for the cause of equality within a global media network.

Step 5 – Pretend not to be Jewish or disassociate publicly from Zionism to win government seats.

Step 6 – Through usury and debt, take over the economy with undisclosed public funding.

Step 7 – Win a majority of government seats for Jews and non-Jewish Zionists.

Step 8 – Pass laws requiring taxes to be sent to Jewish organizations, campaigns, and to Israel.

Step 9 – Pass hate speech laws and other forms of protections for all forms of religion/race/sex/organization so as to pretend to be a moral group deserving protection, hiding amongst protected classes.

Step 10 – Revise history and pass new laws making race, culture, and morals obsolete except for your own, supporting Israel and no other nation.

Step 11 – Export labor and manufacturing and import consumerism (utilize trade unions, labor laws, and misuse public funds to support these efforts).

Step 12 – Allow and protect illegal immigration; use propaganda to gain immigrant votes (children are citizens); demonize cultural or racial majority as the enemy of immigrants. After a few generations, a new majority appears, conditioned to be Jewish/Zionist friendly.

Step 13 – Repeat in all countries until each is dependent on the other.

Step 14 – Cause international appeal for war against uncooperative or incorruptible nations if above steps don’t work or if opposed (as in Germany), then place new Zionist/corporate friendly governments through martial law.

–=–

–=–
Chronology Of Jewish Deception And Ruination
–=–

How does one exclaim the horrific history of the genocide, torture, rape, and famine that was perpetrated upon over 100 million white Christian farmers and peoples of Europe, Asia, and the Ethiopian Jews of Africa by the Jewish/Zionist Red Army in the “Bolshevik Revolution”, when the fable of the Nazi holocaust that supposedly killed 6 million Jews (a statistically impossible feat) is promoted and reinforced in every form of mainstream media?

In reality, the communism that was forged and implemented in 1917 continues to this day by its Edomite organizers, the international Zionists, under their oppressive regimes and “allied forces”. Inversely, Nazism rose up in response to this horror to protect the Germanic people from that international Zionist scourge, and only lasted from 1933 through 1945.

Of course, World War I was a “family affair”, as all of the countries involved were ruled by the kindred blood cousins of King George V. There was not war, only a bloodline family manipulating the nationalist fervor of each of its kingdoms and forcing commerce within its corporations. This is called “war”.

It is a little known fact that the Jews in Germany identified themselves as Germans before World War II, and were quite content to stay in Germany. They did not wish to become citizens of the new Israel. They were Germans. It was thus necessary for the World Jewish Congress to create a Jewish problem in Germany by declaring a world-wide economic war on Germany and its people by international Jewry, forcing the German people to respond against the German Jews…

https://i2.wp.com/www.jewisheastend.com/Plaque%20Settlement%20Henriques%20St.jpg
War Memorial Plaque of Oxford and St George’s Settlement
(Bernhard Baron House), London – for World War I


1933

https://i0.wp.com/www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/articles/jdecwardayexp.jpg

https://i2.wp.com/upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8f/MSG_III_1937_Anti-Nazi_Rally.jpgAnti-German protest at Madison Square Garden, 1937
Speakers included John L. Lewis, head of the CIO, New York’s Mayor Fiorello LaGuardia,
and Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, head of the American Jewish Congress.


The Ramaz School forms its name from the initials (RMZ) of the
world renownedRabbi Moses Zevulun Margolies, (1851-1936).
“The RaMaZ” was recognized as dean of the American rabbinate.
In 1933, the RaMaZ here addresses a mass rally at Madison Square Garden
protesting the threat to Jews in Nazi Germany.

Stephen S. Wise, later to become president of the World Jewish Congress, speaks at an anti-Nazi rally at Madison Square Garden. New York, United States, March 27, 1933.
Stephen S. Wise, later president of the World Jewish Congress,
speaks at an anti-Nazi rally at Madison Square Garden in 1933


New York Mayor Fiorello La Guardia speaks at Jewish Labor Committee, 1935.
Here with founding members of the JLC, David Dubinsky of the International
Ladies’ Garment Workers Union and B. Charney Vladeck, chairman of the JLC.
Major efforts of this organization include an anti-Nazi boycott and
efforts to reform U.S. immigration laws that excluded refugees. 

You didn’t think he had an airport named after him
just because he was a mayor, did you?

–=–

Most “labor unions” had a Jewish organized criminal origin. For as with all systems of government, the Jew must first take over the foundation of its prey before it can subvert and destroy. Today, high wages caused by union contracts and otherwise high wages are the primary excuse used by Jewish run corporations for exporting American corporations and labor oversees. The number of corporations that are in general Jewish run and funded by goy taxpayer dollars – government being the main shareholder in most national and international corporations – would astound the average American…

–=–

Boycotting The Jewish 500?

Just a small fraction of Jewish owned business and supporters of Zionism (Israel) are listed here:

1. Sears/K Mart – Sears was controlled nearly from its inception by the Julius Rosenwald family, and then by Max Adler, who married Sophie Rosenwald. A Significant number of the company’s shares are still Jewish controlled to this day.
2. The Home Depot – The Home Depot was founded in 1978 by Bernie Marcus, Arthur Blank (Atlanta Falcons), Ron Brill, and Pat Farrah. This is the second largest retailer in America, behind Wal-Mart. The Jewish founders retain substantial holdings in the company.
3. Victoria’s Secret (Les Wexner)
4. The Limited (Les Wexner)
5. Bath & Body Works (Les Wexner)
6. The Men’s Wearhouse ( George Zimmer)
7. Staples Office Supply (Thomas G. Stemberg)
8. Office Depot (Merged with Staples, Thomas G. Stemberg)
9. Bon Ton Stores (Founded by Max Grumbacher) – Also includes the following stores: Elder-Beerman, Parisian, Saks Inc., Bergner’s, Boston Store, Carson Pirie Scott, Herbergers, Younkers, Pomeroy’s, Maxwell’s, Fowler’s Department Store
10. Steve & Barry’s University Sportswear (Steve Shore & Barry Prevor)
11. The Gap (Donald Fisher, founder, holds 37% of stock)
12. Banana Republic (Donald Fisher, founder, holds 37% of stock)
13. Old Navy (Donald Fisher, founder, holds 37% of stock)
14. American Eagle Outfitters (founded 1904 by Edward Beinstein. Current CEO J.L. Schottenstein)
15. ABC Warehouse
16. Circuit City (founded 1949 as Wards Appliance Store by Samuel S. Wurtzel, Jewish)
17. Costco Warehouses (founded 1954 by Sol Price, Jewish, as Fed Mart)
18. Spencer Gifts (Steve Silverstein, CEO. Privately held corporation)
19. Eddy Bauer
20. Starbucks (Howarad D. Schultz, CEO)

GMAC – Owned by Cerberus Capital Management, which is headed by Steve Feinberg.

“…We would also challenge them to consider that AOL allocates 30% of its investment portfolio in Israel. Does that effect how CNN reports on the Israeli/Palestinian conflict? At NileMedia, we think it does. The “spin” wizards at CNN, TIME and AOL are not in the journalism business.” —Nile Media

–=–

In your free time, take a look at these links to get a real feel at how difficult or impossible it would be to boycott Jewish businesses in America and beyond – especially when considering that governments are generally the largest institutional investor and holder of ownership stock and corporate bonds (loans to fund corporations) of these companies. It is ironic that the lavish lifestyle we have come to expect has been supplied by this corporate takeover by Jewish businesses funded by the taxpayer dollars of the world. (See my “CAFR School” articles for more info on this.)

List of Jewish American Businesspeople: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Jewish_American_businesspeople

Boycott of Jewish business: http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=71304

To start with, we’d have to give up much of our internet experience, for on the internet – Google, Youtube, Facebook, MySpace, Wikipedia (or as I like to call it… do-it-yourself history), Yahoo, Ebay, and many others are great supporters of Zionism.

Porn, ABC, NBC, CBS, FOX, HBO, CNN, MSNBC, Hollywood (all mainstream media, movie, and newspaper outlets), Caterpillar, Est’ee Lauder, Johnson and Johnson, Revlon, Kimberly-Clark (Kleenex and Huggies), Apax Partners (Jonny Rockets, Sunglass Hut), Delta Galil (Barbie, Victoria’s Secret, GAP, Banana Republic, Structure, J. Crew, JC Penny, DKNY, Ralph Lauren, Hugo Boss), Timberland, Siemens, Sara Lee (oh, not the cookies!), The Limited, Nokia, Motorola, AT&T (and most phone companies) Bank of America, Wells Fargo, J.P. Morgan Chase… Oh heck, let’s just say all major banks, shall we? Chevron, BP, Exxon… Ok, I suppose all of the major oil corporations as well – No driving either…

And then there’s our food…

To boycott Nestle Corporation for example would be extremely difficult . You’d have to stop using L’Oreal products. It would mean no more Kit Kats, Baby Ruths, or Butterfingers. No Nesquick or Nescafe’ for breakfast. No sweets or cookies from Libby’s. No Carnation products of any kind. No Buitoni oils, pastas, or sauces. And then there is the bottled water market… Arrowhead, Poland Spring, Perrier, San Pellegrino (Perrier’s competitor – LOL), Calistoga (San Pellegrino’s competitor – LOL2), Crystal Geyser, Ice Mountain, Zephyr Hills, Ozarka, Pure Life/Pureza Vital, Deer Park, Aquapod, Nestle’ Brand, and others… all of which are brands of Nestle’. Essentially, all bottled water brands are Zionist Israel friendly. And why not, for in the classic scheme of usury they are selling something that flows freely to a bunch of us nincompoops who pay top dollar for somewhat filtered tap water!

This brings a whole new meaning to the word Sayan:

Sayan (Hebrew: helpers, assistants) is a term used to describe a network of “Jews” living outside of Israel who volunteer to provide assistance to the Israeli Mossad.

In fact, with regards to our consumerism on a global scale of primarily Jewish products, all the people of the world may as well convert to Judaism – not that their blood would be accepted. For we are all a Sayan in our ignorance of our own consumer-based support of Israel.

The “Jewish Achievement” website states:

“The selection of Irving Shapiro to head Dupont Corporation was a watershed moment in the history of Jews as CEOs of major U.S. Corporations. His appointment was seen to have broken a cultural logjam. It made Wall Street Journal headlines on December 14, 1973 and Shapiro was soon regarded as a prominent “business establishment” figure. For many, he was seen as “the first Jew to achieve such stature in a major corporation not founded or purchased by Jews.”

Shapiro’s selection was remarkable on many counts. In the 171 years since its founding by French immigrant Eleuth̩re Ir̩n̩e (E.I.) du Pont in 1802, the Company was headed only by succeeding generations of Dupont family members. Further, Shapiro was neither an entrepreneur, nor was he trained as a manager. He did not, as was common in post World War II America, work his way up the organization chart through the rungs of operational, sales, and staff jobs…”

Remember, the boards of directors of corporations elect the CEO, and the shareholders of stock vote via proxy for the boards of directors. When government’s started gaining in power with their stock portfolios and banding together in “corporate governance”, while also taking over the international governments of the world as leaders, it is no wonder that  a “family company” would suddenly be run by a Jew with no experience or honor. And so it is even more disturbing to note that when a corporation moves to say China, it is the government that is voting to make that happen at the expense of its own people. Literally, government through its proxy shareholder votes often forces this to happen. Even worse, government funds the move and construction costs to export manufacturing by offering corporate bonds from taxpayer money. America is an excellent example of what happens to a people when its government is usurped by the intentional Zionist powers and used against that people to cause them to be in debt and dependance. While it took war to ruin Germany, America has been slowly demolished from the inside – its people too scared to be portrayed as “Nazi’s” for fighting the international Jew that has made them debt slaves.

A brilliant incremental plan of manipulation and take-over, if you ask me…

–=–

DuPont corporation is also a perfect example of the danger of segregating the word “Jew” absent of words like Masonry, royal bloodlines, church, etc, as if they are not connected. For the DuPont family were bloodline cousins of the royal families – of the Plantagenet kings and queens of England and beyond who lost the Kingdom of Jerusalem and created the Magna Carta, The Constitution, and the Declaration of Independence…

Royal Arms of England (1198-1340).svg
Angevins – House of Plantagenet “Coat of Arms”
Founded by: Geoffrey Plantagenet, Count of Anjou
Last Sovereign: Richard III of England

Kingdom of England, Kingdom of France, Lordship of Ireland, Principality of Wales

Religions:
Roman Catholicism (official), Greek Orthodoxy,
Syrian Orthodoxy, Islam, Judaism

Capital City of the Kingdom of Jerusalem: Jerusalem (1099–1187)
Tyre (1187–1191)
Acre (1191–1229)
Jerusalem (1229–1244)
Acre (1244–1291)


Near East in 1135.
The kingdom of Jerusalem and the other Crusader states.
Today, it stands as the reconquered kingdom – the “State” of Israel,
and the bloodlines rule their Kingdom once more.

Read about the Kings of Jerusalem, here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Kings_of_Jerusalem

–=–

Perhaps you’ve noticed this Coat of Arms lion or variations of it (horses, serpents, etc.) on many of the product packages you purchase and consume? Or perhaps you passed over it with a cursory glance…

If you buy cigarettes, you see this:

The family crests for the bloodline royal houses decorate and adorn many products. Here we see the phrase “veni-vidi-vici” under that Masonic royal symbol.

Translated, this is a phrase exclaimed by Julius Caesar which means, “I came – I saw – I conquered”.

Indeed, cigarettes are a crowning achievement in the conquering of the consumer idiocracy, for government has financially funded and invested in the corporations that have addicted all nations while being the regulators of those products.

After it taxes the hell out of the consumer, government then uses those taxpayer monies
to reinvest in the same corporations that make other taxable products!
Government then deceivingly uses reverse psychology as advertising to
justify its allowance of such addictive, harmful, and deadly products.
For government is also heavily invested in the medical and pharmaceutical
industries that treat the illnesses caused from these legal products.
More profits, more taxes, more investments…

–=–

And the people actually defend their addictions as if it were their own free will…

–=–

This is certainly not a new model, for the Honorable East India Company
has been addicting the nations of the world for centuries…
as well-depicted here in the movie “The Rising”

–=–

Coat of Arms for Bristol, England

Coat of Arms for the  House of Stuart which reigned between 1603 and 1688.
Henry VIII made a law mandating the display of the royal coat of arms in all churches.

Coat of Arms of the Netherlands

–=–


Coat of Arms for… a tobacco company?

–=–

And I’m sure alcoholics drink because its their choice…

File:Grand Marnier.svg


Even the enforcement arms of government use the Coat of Arms
The bloodline’s brilliant trinity… Addiction, Taxation, Re-Investment
Government is also heavily invested in the private prison industry!
It profits at every turn, from every angle.

–=–

An easy way to understand how government capitalizes (funds) corporations and stands as major stockholder and bond lender is to simply scan through a typical public pension asset holdings report.

If you want the shock of your life, especially when you consider how many public pension funds there are in the world all controlled by Jewish influenced and infiltrated governments – who vote on issues within these corporations as shareholders like election of board-members and mergers and acquisitions – then take a look at just one report here, from the largest Pension fund in America:

Link–>http://www.calpers.ca.gov/eip-docs/about/pubs/annual-investment-report-2012.pdf

When one single government agency has 15,036,400 shares of EXXON MOBIL CORP with a market value of $1.3 billion dollars (see report), is it any wonder that governments don’t take oil companies to task for their spills? It would be bad for the investment portfolio and cut into government dividends from its stock ownership in EXXON!!!

–=–

The temptation for the average worker to earn higher wages than others as a “privilege” of membership to labor unions was and important key to destroying the economic strength of the people in America. For as the Jew knows all to well… there can be no lavish wealth without equally lavish inequity and poverty. By first establishing equal rights, it was then able to grant special rights and privileges through license to only certain workers, creating a purposeful wealth and class-structure within otherwise skill-less men. And it succeeded in turning slaves into house-slaves; men that would literally fight for their union benefits to the death against their starving brethren. The laborers know that unless others are not protected as they are in their labor unions, they would not earn higher wages for doing the same types of jobs as others. This carrot on a stick ironically created class distinctions even among skill-less laborers.  Its the golden rule – wealth requires poverty. For without poverty, wealth simply cannot be measured. And this is the razor sharp edge of how equality destroys. The establishment of inequality requires the forced endowment of equal rights as a legal status by government, for legal equality (civil rights) takes away all individual liberty and gives power to the representatives of a uniformly equal citizenry – one voice for the entirety of all individuals who give up all personal rights to the group (community), while actually believing that equality is a good thing. Again, how else can the international Jew become equal and protected in all societies and in its organized crime, subversion, and then usurpation of representative (legislative) positions in government (thus controlling the nation), without first forcing legal equality and civil rights that protect the Jew in countries where throughout history the Jew has been exiled? This horrific transformation and corruption of morals and culture allowed the Zionist power of the international Jew first as protected, then as equal, and now as elite.

But this equality is not real – it is not in the hearts and minds of men – for it is nothing but a legal status. It is a piece of paper that the people of Germany realized all to well must be torn to shreds in order to route out the literal parasites who created it.

Equal rights is literally the socialist destruction of all cultures around the world. For this type of equality is not earned but granted without merit. This is not real equality of the heart, but is a false status forced upon all people by force. It is actually another name for slavery. So, where for centuries this Synagogue of Satan has been physically and violently removed and exiled from nations and lands far and wide, it now rests comfortably as a protected and equal religion, a protected and equal false “race”, and the ruler of all of those nations and peoples it once fled in fear from.

Wikipedia states:

Fiorello La Guardia’s mother, Irene Coen, was a Jew from Trieste, the Austro-Hungarian Empire; his maternal grandmother Fiorina Luzzatto Coen was a “Luzzatto”, a member of the prestigious Italian-Jewish family of scholars, kabbalists, and poets and including the famous rabbi Samual David Luzzatto. La Guardia was elected mayor of New York City on an anti-corruption Fusion ticket during the Great Depression, which united him in an alliance with New York’s Jewish population and liberal bluebloods (WASPs). In 1937, speaking before the Women’s Division of the American Jewish Congress, La Guardia called for the creation of a special pavilion at the upcoming New York World’s Fair “a chamber of horrors” for “that brown-shirted fanatic“. La Guardia’s sister, Gemma La Guardia Gluck, was arrested by the Germans in a roundup of Jews in Hungary in 1944. She was held under privileged conditions at Ravensbrück concentration camp and released after the war. David Rockefeller became La Guardia’s “secretary” for eighteen months in a “dollar a year” public service position, filling the office of the deputy mayor. In 1941, President Roosevelt appointed La Guardia as the director of the new Office of Civilian Defense (OCD).

–=–

Program for a counter-Olympics held in Randall's Island, New York, in August 1936. The event was sponsored by the Amateur Athletic Union, the American Federation of Labor, the Jewish Labor Committee, and New York City Mayor Fiorello LaGuardia.
Program for a counter-Olympics held in Randall’s Island, New York, in August 1936.
It was sponsored by the Amateur Athletic Union, the American Federation of Labor,
the Jewish Labor Committee, and New York City Mayor Fiorello LaGuardia.
(USHMM #14921/Jewish Labor Committee Collection, New York University)

This cartoon appeared in <i>The Jewish Chronicle</i>, July 10, 1936. The text, laden with sarcasm, says: “Nazis are officially instructed to be courteous to Jews from June 30 to September 1 so that visitors to the Olympic Games may take away a good impression. 1) It is forbidden to bump Jews with iron bars without first saying excuse me. 2) It is forbidden to kick Jewesses in tramcars without first rising and offering your seat.”
This cartoon appeared in The Jewish Chronicle, July 10, 1936.
“Nazis are officially instructed to be courteous to Jews from June 30 to September 1
so that visitors to the Olympic Games may take away a good impression.”

Maintaining the illusion of the “evil German Nazi” was difficult and, like the holocaust,
had to be explained away when the fallacy was visibly rebutted –
Here, fallacy is being promoted that the Nazis are not on good behavior at all times,
but only at the Olympics because they are on film or will be witnessed. Ironically, they are only evil
when there are no real witnesses to corroborate the Jewish stories…

–=–

File:1936 World Jewish Congress First Plenary Assembly Geneva.jpg
First Plenary Assembly of the World Jewish Congress in Geneva, August 1936
This is world organized crime in the making.

File:1948 World Jewish Congress Montreux - 1.jpg
Delegates at the Second Plenary Assembly of the
World Jewish Congress in Montreux, Switzerland, June 1948

https://i2.wp.com/www.loc.gov/exhibits/haventohome/images/hh0183s.jpg
President Truman signs United States recognition of the “State” of Israel

File:World Jewish Congress - Third Plenary Assembly - Geneva 1953.jpg
Third Plenary Assembly of the World Jewish Congress,
Geneva, Switzerland, 4-11 August 1953

https://i0.wp.com/upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/96/1975_WJC_Sixth_Plenary_Assembly_Jerusalem.jpg/330px-1975_WJC_Sixth_Plenary_Assembly_Jerusalem.jpg
Nahum Goldman addressing the Sixth WJC Plenary in Jerusalem in 1975.
Seated on the right: Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin

–=–
The Jewish newspaper Natscha Retsch wrote:

“The war against Germany will be waged by all Jewish communities, conferences, congresses… by every individual Jew. Thereby the war against Germany will ideologically enliven and promote our interests, which require that Germany be wholly destroyed. The danger for us Jews lies in the whole German people, in Germany as a whole as well as individually. It must be rendered harmless for all time…. In this war we Jews have to participate, and this with all the strength and might we have at our disposal.”

**Note: This is racism, also known as eugenics

This Jewish declaration of war and boycott preceded Hitler’s infamous speech of March 28, 1933, which was purely a defensive rebuttal of this declaration of economic war by international Zionism. It was certainly and rightly labeled as a “Jewish problem”.

The Balfour Declaration of 1917 committed the British government to ‘view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people’ – as long as this did not ‘prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine’.

Vladimir Jabotinsky, founder of the Irgun Zvai Leumi terrorist organisation, wrote in the January 1934 issue of Mascha Rjetach:

“For months now the struggle against Germany is waged by each Jewish community at each conference in all our syndicates and by each Jew all over the world. There is reason to believe that our part in this struggle has general value. We will start a spiritual and material war of all the world against Germany’s ambitions to become once again a great nation, to recover lost territories and colonies. But our Jewish interests demand Germany’s total destruction, collectively and individually. The German nation is a threat to us Jews.’

Emil Ludwig Cohen wrote in his book The New Holy Alliance, Strasburg, 1938:

“Even if Hitler at the last moment would want to avoid war which would destroy him he will, in spite of his wishes, be compelled to wage war.”

Bernard Lechache wrote in The Right to Live (December 1938):

“It is our task to organize the moral and cultural blockade of Germany and disperse this nation. It is up to us to start a merciless war.

The Jewish newspaper Central Blad Voor Israeliten in Nederlands printed on 13 September 1939:

“The millions of Jews living in America, England, France, North Africa and South, not forgetting Palestine, have decided to carry on the war in Germany to the very end. It is to be a war of extermination.

The Toronto Star (26 February 1940) printed a declaration of a Rabbi Perlberg, Director of the British section of the Jewish World Congress:

“The Jewish World Congress is in a state of war with Germany for seven years.”

The Jewish magazine Sentinel of Chicago printed in its issue of October 8th, 1940:

“When the National Socialists and their friends cry or whisper that this [war] is brought about by Jews, they are perfectly right.”

And now, the United Nations has been established and is used to declare an international military or economic war with any who do not cooperate with the International Jew. The term “United Nations” gains much more sympathy than the term “World Jewish Congress”, now doesn’t it? And the people of the nations have no idea that their nations were sold.

–=–

Now that international Jewry had instigated an economic war, we see the true
historical perspective of why Germany then defensively boycotted Jewish businesses…

–=–

The one-day German Boycott of April 1, 1933

This was partially a reprisal and an act of revenge against
Gruelpropaganda (atrocity stories) that German and foreign Jews,
assisted by foreign journalists, were allegedly circulating in the
international press to damage Nazi Germany’s reputation…
The organized world Jewish population of every nation against Germany…

The Star of David (Solomon’s Seal) was painted in yellow and black across thousands of
doors and windows, with accompanying anti-commerce slogans against Jews. Signs were
posted saying “Don’t Buy from Jews” and “The Jews Are Our Misfortune.

This is nothing when considering that Jews were openly declaring Germany’s
and the German people’s individual annihilation and extermination.


Note: this is a German businessman, not a soldier.

The German people stood with the Nazi without fear,
for their country and way of life was at stake from within and without.

In 1920, Hitler stated:

 “This Jewish contamination will not subside, this poisoning of the nation will not end,
until the carrier himself, the Jew, has been banished.”

–The War Path: Hitler’s Germany 1933-1939 from an August 1920 speech in Salzburg

–=–

It is clear that no one can argue with this insightful premonition – regardless of your opinion of this man – and that now we certainly have a world-wide poisoning and infection of all nations. Indeed, this type of boycott should be the scene in America for every business that hires illegal workers at illegal poverty wages and for every /Israel supporting corporation (which is most of them), for history shows that non-violent boycotts work all too well. And this would recognize the destruction of world Jewish power over the people, if the people would simply stop supporting and feeding their own parasites.

But the people watch TV provided by the Jew to entertain, distract, and sell to the goy Jewish “Kosher” products…

Also note that the word “banished” is used here by Hitler. For the Jew had been banished from many nations before poisoning Germany’s well. The notion of the holocaust is a fiction by Jews as we will see later, which covers up the real holocaust of the Jewish run Red Army in Russia. Hitler’s  “Final Solution” was a transfer agreement for deportation of Jews to Palestine in agreement with the Jewish Congress, not their extermination. And this was the goal for the Jewish Congress from the beginning. Even today, Israel offers 10’s of thousands of shekels for Iranian Jews to immigrate to Israel. But like the German Jews, the Iranian Jews identify as Iranians, not Israelis. In this way, Iran is the New Germany.

Fortunately, the Germans and the Red Cross kept meticulous records of this and the true livelihood of Jews in camps – including 100’s upon 100’s of live births. This is so obviously contrary to the concept of extermination… that is, the birth of more Jews and the care they received in state of the art hospitals in the “camps” contradicts the fallacious thought that Jews were being “gassed” and exterminated. A little logic goes a long way!

Hitler’s first response was defensive, not offensive – a single day of boycotting Jewish businesses in Germany in retaliation to the Jewish led boycott by world Jewry in March of 1933. The German economy was already in shambles, and an international boycott on German goods was a literal declaration of war by the international Zionist’s who sought its destruction and the exportation of German Jews to Palestine (leading to the “Transfer Agreement”). This response by Germans was as pathetic a reaction as is happening today, around the world, toward this international Zionist power and its deprivation of world-wide culture and society – the unseen enemy of all men.

An International Jewish Boycott Conference was later held in Amsterdam to coordinate the ongoing boycott campaign, part of the newly proclaimed “World Jewish Economic Federation” (WJEF).

Samuel Untermyer, elected president of the WJEF, delivered this speech on BBC radio, a transcript of which was printed in The New York Times on August 7, 1933, calling for a “sacred war” against Germany:

“When the tale is told… the world will confront a picture so fearful in its barbarous cruelty that the hell of war and the alleged Belgian atrocities pale into insignificance as compared to this devilishly, deliberately, cold-bloodedly planned and already partially executed campaign for the extermination of a proud, gentle, loyal, law-abiding people.. The Jews are the aristocrats of the world. From time immemorial they have been persecuted and have seen their persecutors come and go. They alone have survived. And so will history repeat itself, but that furnishes no reason why we should permit this reversion of a once great nation to the Dark Ages or fail to rescue these 600,000 human souls from the tortures of hell… What we are proposing and have already gone far toward doing, is to prosecute a purely defensive economic boycott that will undermine the Hitler regime and bring the German people to their senses by destroying their export trade on which their very existence depends… We propose to and are organizing world opinion to express itself in the only way Germany can be made to understand…”

Chaim Weizmann, president of both the international “Jewish Agency” and of the World Zionist Organization (and later Israel’s first president), told British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain in a letter published in The London Times on September 6th, 1939 that:

“I wish to confirm, in the most explicit manner, the declarations which I and my colleagues have made during the last month, and especially in the last week, that the Jews stand by Great Britain and will fight on the side of the democracies. Our urgent desire is to give effect to these declarations [against Germany]. We wish to do so in a way entirely consonant with the general scheme of British action, and therefore would place ourselves, in matters big and small, under the coordinating direction of His Majesty’s Government. The Jewish Agency is ready to enter into immediate arrangements for utilizing Jewish manpower, technical ability, resources, etc.”

In other words, international Jewry became the army of Great Britain and subject of the crown, with the goal of establishing Israel – the goal of all involved. That included the German Jews residing in Germany…

Rsgba
A man in the Jewish Brigade, a segment of the British Army
that fought the Germans in Italy in 1944. The rocket says “Hitler’s Gift”.


Jew Oscar Westreich left Berlin and gained a new identity in Palestine.
He eventually joined the British army, whose training of Jewish soldiers proved
crucial to the formation of Israel, as his daughter, Mira Bar-Hillel, explains.
It was British forces who, through this international alliance with the Synagogue of Satan,
forcefully “reconquered” the land of Palestine to claim and re-create the Kingdom of Jerusalem.
And the Temple of Solomon is now ready to be rebuilt.

For unknown to most people, the Star of David is actually the Seal of Solomon.
And the founding of Israel is to Rebuild his 3rd Temple
and reclaim the Kingdom of Jerusalem.

“Set me as a seal upon thy heart”
Song of Solomon 8:6

–=–
Genocide Of Semetics By Ashkenazim
–=–


Jewish immigrant from Ethiopia at Ben Gurion International Airport,
October 29, 2012. Israel recently passed a law banning undocumented
immigrants from sending money out of Israel.

–=–

It is ironic that most people would not consider a black Jew.

It is also the consequence of claiming a Jewish homeland while posing as a Semitic people that ALL JEWS must be allowed to immigrate into Israel. This fact has lead to the severe mistreatment, murder, and genocide by the Ashkenazim against the true Semitic peoples of the world.

Thus, we must consider the illegal “State” of Israel is the enemy of the true Jewish people – the actual Semite lines – which are the black African and Arab people of darker skin. These white Ashkenazim Edomites are the royal bloodlines, the kings and queens, the Order.

One aspect of this age-old genocidal attack on the true Semitic peoples was recently reported upon in Israel by Harretz:

“An inconceivable crime…

Israel’s patronizing and inhumane treatment of Ethiopian women is nothing new.

It’s hard to believe, but in Israel, in 2012, Ethiopian women are forced to receive injections of the Depo-Provera contraceptive. This injection is not a commonly prescribed means of contraception. It is considered a last resort and is usually given to women who are institutionalized or developmentally disabled.”

Source–> http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/an-inconveivable-crime.premium-1.484110

Time Magazine reported in March, 2013, about this Ashkenazim imposed racism against the true Semites:

Israeli Deputy Health Minister Yaakov Litzman has called for an investigation into the reported administering of Depo-Provera contraceptive shots to Ethiopian immigrant women without consent. Depo-Provera is a progestrogin-only contraceptive that is administered every three months through injection. According to Dr. Paula Franklin of Marie Stopes International who spoke with TIME, it is a “safe, medium-term reversible hormonal contraceptive” that is used around the world by women of “informed consent.” However, countless Ethiopian women have reportedly been given this contraceptive without understanding or consent.

The news that Ethiopian women were being injected with Depo-Provera, a contraceptive shown to have links with bone loss, emerged in December 2012 following a documentary by Israeli journalist Gal Gabai. In her short film titled Where Did the Children Disappear to, Gabai revealed that, in the past decade, the birthrate among Ethiopian immigrants had decreased by 50%, writes the Jewish Daily Forward. She discovered that women were denied proper family-planning counseling or an outline of birth control methods from medical staff, while others were informed that their entry into Israel would be blocked if they refused to take the contraceptive, notes the Guardian. Many had no idea what they were being injected with. In the documentary, Gabai offers two possible explanations — either it is “an intention to do good, to prevent poverty and to help with the adjustment to Western urbanized living,” or it’s an “economic calculation to reduce immigration and absorption costs.” “This story reeks of racism, paternalism and arrogance,” Gabai told viewers during the broadcast on Israeli Educational Television.

https://i2.wp.com/www.loc.gov/exhibits/haventohome/images/hh0194s.jpgMoorish Zionist [sic] Temple in Harlem, New York, taken in 1929 by James Van Der Zee,
acclaimed African American photographer who chronicled the Harlem Renaissance.
Note that the American flag and a flag of Zion appear next to one another.
–=–

File:1957 WJC meeting with Mitterrand in Paris.jpgFrench Justice Minister François Mitterrand (left) and leaders of
the World Jewish Congress at a meeting in Paris in June 1957

http://i2.wp.com/www.loonwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/sarkozy-avec-kepa.jpg?resize=320%2C219
France – President Nicolas Sarkozy
Sarkozy with Menorah
France – President Nicolas Sarkozy

France – President Nicolas Sarkozy

–=–
Forced Integration By Law
–=–

In December of 2008, Sarkozy made a disturbing speech. The Brussels Journal reports:

“Recently Nicolas Sarkozy announced plans to pursue a vigorous policy of diversity and métissage. Concretely, this means giving preference to minorities in job hiring and prosecuting those who do not comply. In other words, affirmative action as a government policy from which none are exempt.

In his message Sarkozy insisted that the French people must change, that there will be dire consequences if they don’t, and that not to intermarry racially is bad for the survival of the country. Thus he amalgamated the concepts of preference for minorities in job hiring with that of the need for the French to intermarry racially.”

(Source–>http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/3764)

Some translated excerpts from that speech:

“(…) the objective is to meet the challenge of “métissage” – the challenge of “métissage” that the 21st century is confronting us with. The challenge of “métissage”, France has always been familiar with it, and by meeting the challenge of “métissage” France remains faithful to her history. Moreover, it is consanguinity that has always provoked the end of civilizations and societies.

The verb “métisser” theoretically means to mix blood or to crossbreed, but at times it is used more loosely to mean mix cultures. Sarkozy uses the word, or a form of it, at least 7 times in the first few seconds of his speech.

Other meanings for the word “métisser”?

Take your pick…

“Crossbreeding”; “racial mixing”; “miscegenation”; “mongrelisation” and “bastardisation”.

At the conclusion, Sarkosy stated:

“Ladies and Gentlemen, this is the last thing: If republican will power does not function, it will be necessary for the Republic to resort to even more forcible methods… But we don’t have a choice. Diversity at the base of the country must be reflected by diversity at the head of the country… It is not a choice. It is an obligation. It is an imperative. We cannot do otherwise at the risk of finding ourselves faced with considerable problems… We must change, so we will change.”

Note that Sarkosy is born of a French mother and a Hungarian Jewish father…

–=–


France – President Francois Hollande


France – Bernard Kouchner, Foreign Minister


Georgia – President Mikheil Saakashvili


Georgia – President Mikheil Saakashvili


Germany – Chancellor Angela Merkel at Yad Vashem, Israel


Germany – Chancellor Angela Merkel


Germany – Chancellor Angela Merkel with Netanyahu (and Bush)

–=–
The Zionist Planned Genocide Of Germany
–=–

It was an amazingly brilliant piece of public relations gumption to have perverted history into making Germany out to be the bad guy. The Jewish plan to exterminate the German people was present in World War 1 and Bolshevism, carried over to World War 2, and will no doubt culminate in World War 3.

Mark Weber exposes the historical goals of international Zionism and Jewry:

Photobucket
Germany Must Perish!
by Theodore N. Kaufman, Newark, N.J., Argyle press, Copyright 1941
Library of Congress Call No.: DD222.K3

–=–

Begin Excerpt:

Theodore N. Kaufman, the author of Germany Must Perish, was a Manhattan-born Jewish businessman who was also chairman of a group that called itself the “American Federation for Peace.” The first edition of this slim volume was published in 1940 or early 1941. A second, 96-page edition, which sold for 25 cents, was published in 1941 by Argyle Press of Newark, New Jersey. Both editions were issued when the United States was still officially neutral, that is, before the Pearl Harbor attack of December 7, 1941, that brought the U.S. openly into World War II.

Kaufman’s fervent proposal for the systematic sterilization of the entire German population was given respectful attention in the American press, including reviews in a number of newspapers. A review in the weekly Time magazine, March 24, 1941, called Kaufman’s plan a “sensational idea.”

Germany’s propaganda chief, Joseph Goebbels, seized with delight on the book. “This Jew [Kaufman] has done a disservice to the enemy,” Goebbels privately commented. “If he had composed the book at my behest he couldn’t have done a better job.”

At his direction the German press played up Kaufman’s call for genocide. A front page article about the book in the Berlin daily Der Angriff, July 23, 1941, appeared under headlines that called it a “Diabolical Plan for the Extermination of the German People” and a work of “Old Testament Hatred.” Extracts also appeared, for example, in the nationally-circulated weekly paper Das Reich, August 3, 1941.

A plan similar to Kaufman’s was issued during the war years by a prominent American anthropologist. In an article headlined “Breed War Strain Out of Germans” in the New York daily newspaper P.M., January 4, 1943, Ernest Hooton laid out an “outbreeding” plan that would “destroy German nationalism and aggressive ideology while retaining and perpetuating desirable German biological and sociological capacities.” (See also: Benjamin Colby, ‘Twas a Famous Victory, 1974, p. 131.)

The Harvard University professor’s proposal called for genetically transforming the German nation by encouraging mating of German women with non-German men, who would be brought into the country in large numbers, and of German men, forcibly held outside of Germany, with non-German women. Ten to twelve million German men would be assigned to forced labor under Allied supervision in countries outside of Germany to rebuild their economies. “The objects of this measure,” wrote Dr. Hooton, “include reduction of the birthrate of ‘pure’ Germans, neutralization of German aggressiveness by outbreeding and denationalization of indoctrinated individuals.”

This plan, Hooton estimated, would require at least 20 years to be implemented. “During this period,” he went on, “encourage also the immigration and settlement in the German states of non-German nationals, especially males.”

In the decades since the end of World War II, something of the spirit of the genocidal Kaufman and Hooton plans seems manifest in Germany’s population and immigration policies. Since the nation’s defeat in 1945, the German birth rate has fallen to below the replacement level, millions of racially and culturally alien migrants have been welcomed as settlers in Germany, the number of children of mixed ethnicity has sharply increased, and the ethnic-cultural character of much of the country has been drastically altered, especially in the larger cities.

This dynamic volume outlines a comprehensive plan for the extinction of the German nation and the total eradication from the earth, of all her people. Also contained herein is a map illustrating the possible territorial dissection of Germany and the apportionment of her lands…

End Excerpt

You may read the text of the publication “Germany Must Perish” on Weber’s sight, here:
http://ironlight.wordpress.com/2010/04/22/mainstream-jewish-pre-war-outline-for-german-extermination/

–=–


Greece – Georgios Papandreou in Yad Vashem, Israel


Holland – Queen Beatrix

Hungarian PM with kippa
Hungary – Prime Minister Ferenc Gyurcsany

File:ViktorOrban-WorldJewishCongress-Budapest2013.jpg
Hungary – Prime Minister Viktor Orbán addressing the opening dinner of
the Plenary Assembly of the World Jewish Congress in Budapest, 5 May 2013
The newly elected Jewish World Congress for 2013

–=–

From the World Jewish Congress website and its 2013 meeting in Budapest, Hungary:

Delegates also elected Baron David de Rothschild from France as the new chairman of the WJC Governing Board, which is the highest decision-making body between plenary assemblies. Chella Safra from Brazil was named as the new treasurer of the organization and will oversee the financial management of the WJC. Moshe Kantor, the president of the European Jewish Congress, was elected as chairman of the WJC Policy Council, and Mervyn Smith from South Africa will be the co-chairman. The Policy Council advises the Executive Committee on matters of policy, programming and the implementation of the mission of the World Jewish Congress.

The Plenary Assembly also changed the WJC Constitution to ensure that the sitting senior lay leaders of the 12 largest Jewish communities in the world Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Hungary, Russia, South Africa. Ukraine, United States of America) automatically have a seat on the new WJC Executive

The (2013) gathering in Budapest was notably addressed by Hungarian Prime Minister Victor Orbán, who said that “anti-Semitism today in Hungary is unacceptable, and we will show zero tolerance in regards to it.” Introducing Orbán, Ronald Lauder called on Hungary and the government to do more against growing anti-Semitism, notably coming from the extreme-right Jobbik party.

Mazsihisz President Péter Feldmájer said in his speech at the opening dinner: “I believe that the Jews of the world must unite their forces. This day also shows us that we are not alone, we are all listening to each other no matter where we may be living across the globe. The task we have is no little one to handle.

Germany’s Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle said in his keynote address on Monday, which was received with a standing ovation by the delegates: “Anti-Semitism has no place neither in Berlin, nor in Budapest, nor anywhere else in Europe or in the world… We are firmly committed to protecting and nourishing Jewish life in our societies and to countering anti-Semitism across the globe. We have to tackle the root causes of anti-Semitism.”

Discussions about effective ways to combat the rise of neo-Nazi parties in Europe took center-stage in Budapest, and the Plenary Assembly adopted a resolution which called on Hungary “to recognize that Jobbik and its subsidiaries “pose a fundamental threat to Hungary’s democracy” and that “decisive action … must now be taken to take effective measures including by enacting and enforcing legislation, for the protection of all citizens and residents of this country, in particular vulnerable minorities such as the Roma and the Jews, against threats of violence, racist hate and insults and the denial of the Holocaust.”

The WJC also urged national leaders and legislators in Europe to join the 125 legislators from more than 40 countries in signing the London Declaration on Combating Anti-Semitism.”

(Source–>http://www.worldjewishcongress.org/en/news/13476/world_jewish_congress_plenary_assembly_in_budapest)

–=–


Italy – Prime Minister Silivio Berlusconi


Italy – Prime Minister Silivio Berlusconi


Italy – Foreign Minister Gianfranco Fini


Italy – Foreign Minister Gianfranco Fini


Italian Prime Minister Mario Monti at the
Council on Foreign Relations in New York on Sept. 27.

Italy’s prime minister promised Italian Jews he would stand beside them in the fight against anti-Semitism and Holocaust denial.

“We know that anti-Semitism has not been eradicated in Europe,” Italian Prime Minister Mario Monti said at a ceremony Tuesday night marking the 69th anniversary of the World War II round-up and deportation of 1,024 Roman Jews to Auschwitz. “We will not leave you alone.”

Monti, who was joined by Rome’s mayor, several government ministers and other officials, spoke before several thousand people gathered outside Rome’s Great Synagogue to mark the anniversary. Earlier, many had taken part in a torchlight memorial march through the city.

Monti promised that the government would act against mounting racial prejudice and xenophobia in Europe.”

Source–>http://www.jewishjournal.com/world/article/italian_prime_minister_says_he_will_stand_by_countrys_jews

And you thought Italy was an Italian and Catholic nation?

“Holocaust denial” is code for people who present actual provable, historical facts that disprove the outrageous claims that 6 million Jews were placed into mythical ovens in concentration camps during World War II – or that any were cooked at all. The immediate response is to build a straw-man argument that the presenter of these facts is “anti-Semitic” thereby bypassing the facts and using ad hominem fallacy to attack the messenger instead of acknowledging the fact that cannot be dis-proven. This is a classic elicitation used by attorneys. To elicit something means the use of trickery and word magic to obtain something not due. Again, the term “Jewish” was added to the definition of Semitic last century, and so the use of that word is fallacious from the start!

What is a Semite?

  1. A member of a group of Semitic-speaking peoples of the Near East and northern Africa, including the Arabs, Arameans, Babylonians, Carthaginians, Ethiopians, Hebrews, and Phoenicians.

A Semite is defined here as of Arab and even African decent. And the Hebrews were of darker skin. Therefore, to say one is anti-Semetic would mean that one is anti-Arab, anti-Black African, and anti-Hebrew. But only in the last 100 years has this term been hijacked and used to describe a strictly anti-Jewish connotation.

The term Sephardim includes most Mizrahi Jews, and in Israel this term sometimes means any Jew who is not Ashkenazim. Sephardi Jews are of Arab decent, and many have the semblance of the Spanish people due to their historic settlement and commingling in areas inside and around Spain.

Jews who came from Eastern Europe and Russia are called Ashkenazim.

But are these people really Semetic, or just pretending?

This question is answered later in this presentation…

The name Ashkenaz was first used in the Middle Ages for Jews living along the Rhine River in northern France and western Germany. Many of these Jews later migrated eastward and formed communities in Germany, Poland, Austria, Eastern Europe and Russia between the 10th and 19th centuries. Ashkenazic Jews developed their own language, Yiddish, by combining Hebrew with German. Likewise, they developed a distinct culture by combining Jewish culture with the culture of the countries in which they lived.

The white-skinned Ashkenazim even claim anti-Semetism as a trick – an ad hominem fallacious attack on the messenger, not the message.

But don’t take my word for it, let them tell you the truth:

–=–

http://i0.wp.com/www.loonwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/koizumi_yarmulke.jpg?resize=294%2C350
Japan – Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi, Western wall

Montenegro – Prime Minister Igor Luksic


Norway – Former Prime Minister Gro-Harlem-Brundtland,
Former Brazilian President Fernando Henrique Cardoso,
Former United States President Jimmy Carter,
Former Irish President Mary Robinson,
South African Archbishop Emeritus Desmond Tutu

–=–
From Israel To Palestine And Back Again:
Radioactively
Poetic Justice
–=–

The Sunday Times front-page report published on June 19, 1977,  first revealed to the world that Israeli authorities had been torturing Palestinian prisoners, that this torture was “widespread and systematic,” and that it “appears to be sanctioned at some level as deliberate policy.” At the time Israeli officials and Jewish-Zionist leaders in the United States protested the Sunday Times revelations, and denied the charge. Later, though, Israeli torture of prisoners was independently verified by Amnesty International, and other organizations.

–=–

Israel is working on an “ethnically targeted” biological weapon that would kill or harm Arabs but not Jews, according to Israeli military and western intelligence sources cited in a front-page report in the London Sunday Times, November 15, 1998 (“Israel Planning ‘Ethnic’ Bomb as Saddam Caves In,” by Uzi Mahnaimi and Marie Colvin).

In developing this “ethno-bomb,” the British paper went on, Israeli scientists are trying to exploit medical advances by identifying distinctive genes carried by some Arabs, and then create a genetically modified bacterium or virus. The goal is to use the ability of viruses and certain bacteria to alter the DNA inside the host’s living cells. The scientists are trying to engineer deadly microorganisms that attack only those bearing the distinctive genes.

The secret Israel program is based at the Institute for Biological Research in Nes Tsiona, a small town southeast of Tel Aviv, the main research facility for Israel’s clandestine arsenal of chemical and biological weapons.

(Source–>http://ironlight.wordpress.com/2010/04/21/israels-ethno-biological-weapons/)

–=–

The price of this Jewish supremacy, racism, arrogance, lies, and torture?

Self-destruction…

As printed at the Salem-News.com:

“(TEL AVIV / SALEM) – Israel’s population is facing a dire threat: a drastic depopulation, from the use of weapons that leave behind Depleted Uranium (DU). Depleted Uranium leads to the word Omnicidal, as DU kills everything in the food chain, everywhere the wind blows. Experts say the dramatic drop in Israel’s sperm count could eliminate their ability to reproduce.

Research by an Israeli doctor shows a significant drop in sperm count level and sperm motility among young Israeli soldiers in recent years. Sperm motility is the ability of sperm to move properly toward an egg.

It is attributed to the inhalation of DU aerosolized nano-particles; the dirty results of extra powerful weapons used by Israel and the U.S.

All of that military might as it turns out, could set the stage for a massive Israeli act of population suicide.

A study by Dr. Ronit Haimov-Kokhman released in November, showed a 40-percent decline in the concentration of sperm cells in Israeli sperm donors from 2004 to 2008, compared to samples taken between 1995 and 1999.

Sperm banks in Israel are now reportedly turning away as many as two-thirds of potential donors, due to the low-quality sperm. In the past, around one-third of the potential donors were turned away…”

–=–

In the name of genocide and depopulation of the Palestinian/Arab/Semitic peoples by Zionism and Israel, including the unleashed power of the United States military as its useful idiot for which it holds the reigns, I offer my heartfelt grief, sorrow, and regret that my own people remain complacent and weak. And though I know it is my blood enemy, I am saddened at this God-sent and ironic justice being delivered upon the Ashkenazim carpetbaggers who have occupied, stolen, and killed Palestine and her people.

But we are talking about the international Jewish problem, so let’s continue with the rest of the world…

–=–

–=–


Peru – Former President Alejandro Toledo, World Jewish Congress

File:2008 World Jewish Congress Delegation meets with Polish PM Donald Tusk.jpg
Poland – World Jewish Congress Delegation meets with
Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk in Warsaw, June 2008


Poland – Prime Minister Donald Tusk at Western Wall

Donald Tusk at Wailing Wall


Poland – President Lech Kaczynski


Portugal – Jose Barrosso


European Union – Jose Barrosso is now the
appointed President of the “European Commission”
European People’s Party (EPP)


European Union – Jose Barrosso


European Parliament President Hans-Gert Poettering
with chief rabbi of Tel Aviv, Yisrael Meir Lau


European Commission President Romano Prodi


Portugal – President Aníbal Cavaco Silva, at the Lisbon synagogue


Portugal – President Jorge Sampaio, Lisbon synagogue


Russia – President Dmitry Medvedev

http://i1.wp.com/www.loonwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/putin_yarmulke.jpg?resize=340%2C311
Russian prime minister Vladimir Putin

Putin at Moscow's Jewish Museum.

–=–
Putin On Russia’s Jewish Bolshevism Government
–=–

Haaretz reports:

“Russian President Vladimir Putin said that at least 80 percent of the members of the first Soviet government were Jewish.

“I thought about something just now: The decision to nationalize this library was made by the first Soviet government, whose composition was 80-85 percent Jewish,” Putin said June 13 during a visit to Moscow’s Jewish Museum and Tolerance Center.

Putin was referencing the library of Rabbi Joseph I. Schneerson, the late leader of the Chabad-Lubavitch movement. The books, which are claimed by Chabad representatives in the United States, began being moved to the museum in Moscow this month.

According to the official transcription of Putin’s speech at the museum, he went on to say that the politicians on the predominantly Jewish Soviet government “were guided by false ideological considerations and supported the arrest and repression of Jews, Russian Orthodox Christians, Muslims and members of other faiths. They grouped everyone into the same category.

“Thankfully, those ideological goggles and faulty ideological perceptions collapsed. And today, we are essentially returning these books to the Jewish community with a happy smile.”

Widely seen as the first Soviet government, the Council of People’s Commissars was formed in 1917 and comprised 16 leaders, including chairman Vladimir Lenin, foreign affairs chief Leon Trotsky and Joseph Stalin, who was in charge of the People’s Commissariat of Nationalities.”

(Source–>http://www.haaretz.com/jewish-world/jewish-world-news/putin-first-soviet-government-was-mostly-jewish-1.530857)

–=–


Serbia – President Boris Tadic visiting Israel


South Africa – former South African President Nelson Mandela with Gill Marcus and
Professor Michael Katz, President of the South African Jewish Board of Deputies (SAJBD).
African National Congress, December 1990


South Africa – (top) Nelson Mandela and Jewish Communist leader Joe Slovo.
(bottom) – NAACP President Kivie Kaplan posing with Martin Luther King Jr.


South Africa – President Jacob Zuma meets with Irwin Cotler,
former Canadian Justice Minister and Jewish community activist.

File:JoseMariaAznarWorldJewishCongress2010.jpg
Spain – Former Spanish Prime Minister Jose Maria Aznar addressing
a meeting of the World Jewish Congress in Jerusalem, 1 September 2010


Spain – Former Prime Minister (1996 to 2004) José María Aznar
attends a meeting of the World Jewish Congress in Israel 2010


Spain – José María Aznar at pro-Israeli lobby group AIPAC


Sweden – Prime Minister Göran Persson


Sweden – Prime Minister Göran Persson


Tibet – Buddhist chief Dalai Lama at Wailing Wall

Tibet – Dalai Lama


United Kindom – Foreign Minister David Miliband


United Kingdom – Jewish Foreign Minister David Miliband


UK – Prime Minister David Cameron in Yad Vashem, Israel


United Kingdom – Prime Minister Tony Blair

File:Tony Blair - Jerusalem - June 2011.jpg
International Quartet Envoy and former British Prime Minister Tony Blair
addressing a gathering of the World Jewish Congress in Jerusalem

http://i0.wp.com/www.loonwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/brown_yarmulke.jpg?resize=253%2C400
United Kingdom – Prime Ministers Tony Blair, Gordon Brown


United Kingdom – Prime Minister Gordon Brown in Yad Vashem, Israel


United Nations – Secretary-General Kofi Annan and his wife Nane
(from the Swedish Wallenberg Jewish finance family)


United States
(See Below)


Venezuela – President Hugo Chavez

–=–
The Vatican
–=–


Vatican City
Catholic???


Pope Benedict XVI at the Wailing Wall


Vatican – Pope Benedict XVI Ratzinger


Pope John Paul II at the Wailing Wall


Vatican – Pope John Paul II


Vatican – Pope John Paul II


Pope Benedict XVI Ratzinger

File:1993 Maria Celli-Riegner-Beilin-Vatican-Israel-Relations.jpg
World Jewish Congress leader Gerhart M. Riegner (center) witnesses formal
establishment of diplomatic relations between the Holy See, represented by
Monsignor Claudio Maria Celli (left), and Israel, represented by
Deputy Foreign Minister Yossi Beilin.


Pope John Paul II visits Yad Vashem Holocaust Centre in Israel

https://i2.wp.com/media.israelhayom.co.il/2011/10/02/131754913679963684a_b.jpg
Rabbi Yisrael Meir Lau, chief rabbi of Tel Aviv
A.K.A. “Everybody’s Rabbi”


France – Jewish Cardinal Aaron Jean-Marie Lustiger embracing Rabbi Sirat


Evangelical leader Pat Robertson delivers a speech to a crowd of mostly
evangelical Christians from various nations on a pilgrimage to Israel, 2004.

–=–

–=–

***A Note to Christians***

If ever there was or will be an “anti-Christ” (not to mention one that loves to brag about its responsibility in killing Christ and that He is now boiling in excrement in some place like hell), it is surely right before your eyes – in the form of the international organized Zionist Jew. Isn’t it time to become Christian soldiers and defeat this biblical enemy instead of becoming Friends Of Israel and part of the Christian/Jewish Alliance? How can total and complete enemies be in such an unholy partnership? The Holy Bible is full of violence, which I was fooled into thinking was all a bad thing thanks to Jewish manipulation. Now I realize that it is time for Christians to take the lessons and allegory of the Bible to heart, for violence is a natural biblical response to the purposeful destruction of your species, your values, your families, and your way of life. Will you truly allow the Synagogue of Satan – less than 2% of the U.S. population – to rule you and demoralize and murder your children without a fight?

Jewish comedy at your expense…
They are laughing at you and your “other cheek”.

–=–
The United States
Corruption At all levels
–=–

Video: 300 U.S. Congressmen sign pledge of Allegiance to Israel

Video: Cynthia McKinney refuses to sign a pledge to Israel…
is politically ostracized, redistricted, and loses her office

–=–
The Presidents
–=–


Must Watch Video:
The quad-annual migration of presidential candidates to Israel

–=–

“While only a tiny proportion of the US population is Jewish,
94(%) of Jews live in 13 key electoral college states,
which combined have enough electors to elect the president.”
–World Jewish Congress
(Source–>http://www.worldjewishcongress.org/en/communities/show?id=72)

–=–


President Obama (2009-2017?)


President Obama at the Wailing Wall


President Obama at Yad Vashem, Israel

Bush at the Wailing Wall


President George W. Bush

President Bill Clinton (1993-2001)


Bill and Hillary

–=–

“We Jews have put issue upon issue to the American people.
Then we promote both sides of the issue as confusion reigns.
With their eye’s fixed on the issues, they fail to see who is behind every scene.
We Jews toy with the American public as a cat toys with a mouse…”
“Americans have not had a presidential choice since 1932.
Roosevelt was our man; every president since Roosevelt has been our man.”

– (Harold Wallace Rosenthal)

Roosevelt Labor's ChoiceAn issue of the Yiddish socialist daily, the Forward, endorsed Roosevelt
on the cover of its November 1, 1936, rotogravure section.
In 1936, Roosevelt garnered 85 percent of the Jewish vote.
Note the support of the Jewish run “Labor” unions.

Stop Your Cruel Oppression of the Jews
“In this print, which appeared after a 1905 pogrom in Kishinev, a “Russian Jew” carries on his back a large bundle labeled “Oppression;” hanging from the bundle are weights labeled “Autocracy,” “Robbery,” “Cruelty,” “Assassination,” “Deception,” and “Murder.” In the background, on the right, a Jewish community burns, while in the upper left corner, President Theodore Roosevelt asks the Emperor of Russia, Nicholas II, “Now that you have peace without, why not remove his burden and have peace within your borders?”
(Source–>http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/haventohome/haven-home.html)

Giant Mass Meeting sponsored by the Trade Union Council and New York City Committee of the Jewish People, September 18, 1941
The dual-sided English-Yiddish broadside – rally supporting President Franklin Roosevelt
and his “policy of all aid to Great Britain, the Soviet Union, and China,” in 1941,
sponsored by the Jewish Peoples Committee, a pro-communist organization.
David Dubinsky, president of the International Ladies Garment Union, declined to attend this
September 18, 1941, rally because he viewed the sponsoring group as Communist controlled.
(Source–>http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/haventohome/haven-home.html)

https://i2.wp.com/www.loc.gov/exhibits/haventohome/images/hh0170s.jpg
Hebrew Prayer for Roosevelt and Churchill
This hand-drawn plaque includes dual Hebrew prayers for Winston Churchill and
Franklin Roosevelt.  The one for Roosevelt, based on the traditional Jewish prayer
for the government, reads: “[May He] who gives salvation to President Roosevelt,
[He] whose kingdom is everlasting, protect, and increase, and raise up all of the officials
of America, and [may] the King of Kings lift them up and lengthen their days in office.”


“V for Vendetta” was a Jewish creation with Jewish writers and actors
that promotes the false paradigm of a vendetta for the holocaust,
as most movies do.


Zionist Congress: Join the British Army for Victory.
(Translated) “We will fight them where-ever we meet them, and we will hit them
Hard and Often, until this scourge is driven from the Earth” –Sir Winston Churchill.
Unite with the British to defeat the Nazis. Jewish enlisting is important
in giving the support of the Zionists in the Jewish Agency.

File:V-E-Day Stars and Stripes No 285 Paris 8 May 1945.JPG
This is the real Ashkenazim V for Victory, commonly called VE-Day
(Victory in Europe Day)

–=–

Note that Roosevelt and Churchhill (and all past U.S. Presidents and Prime Ministers)
are royal blood cousins with the Kings and Queens of England;
here genealogically chronicled by the Mormon “Church” :
https://realitybloger.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/3ee75-howlandpedigree.jpg

–=–
Abraham Lincoln-stein
–=–

Isachar Zacharie (1827-1900) to Abraham Lincoln
“English born Isachar Zacharie was President Lincoln’s chiropodist, political confidante, and special emissary. Among other things, Zacharie involved himself in helping Abraham Lincoln secure the Jewish vote. In a letter to Lincoln on November 3, 1864, Zacharie wrote: “I just returned to this city after a trip of nine days through Pennsylvania and New York state, and I am happy to inform you, that I am satisfied that I have done much good, I now think all is Right . . . . As regards the Isrelites [sic]–with but few Exceptions, they will vote for you. . . . I understand them well, and have taken the precaution–to see that they do as they have promised–I have secured good and trustworthy men to–attend on them on Election Day–My Men have been all the week seeing that their masses are properly Registered–so that all will go right on the 8th ins.”

(Source–>http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/haventohome/haven-home.html)

–=–

“Lincoln was the first President to make it possible for rabbis to serve as military chaplains by signing the 1862 Act of Congress which changed the law that had barred all but Christian clergymen from the role. It all started on September 8, 1861, when a 30-year-old Philadelphia cantor, Michael Mitchell Allen, returned to his encampment with the 65th Regiment of the Fifth Pennsylvania Cavalry, known as Cameron’s Dragoons. The regiment of 1,200 men, mostly Jews, elected him their chaplain. Complaints flew up the military ladder. Lincoln, then signed the Act, and Jewish chaplains have been serving in the American Armed Forces ever since.

He was also the first, and happily, the only President who was called upon to revoke an official act of anti-Semitism by the U.S. government. He canceled General Ulysses S Grant’s “Order No. 11” expelling all Jews from Tennessee from the district controlled by his armies during the Civil War. (Grant denied personal responsibility for this act attributing it to his subordinate.)

Shortly after delivering the Emancipation Proclamation, Lincoln met Canadian Christian Zionist, Henry Wentworth Monk, who expressed hope that Jews who were being oppressed in Russia and Turkey be emancipated “by restoring them to their national home in Palestine.” Lincoln replied this was “a noble dream and one shared by many Americans.”…

In his study of American Jewry and the Civil War (Philadelphia, 1951), Bertram W. Korn writes that in the eulogy Rabbi Isaac M. Wise delivered after Lincoln’s assassination, he said: “The lamented Abraham Lincoln believed himself to be bone from our bone and flesh from our flesh. He supposed himself to be a descendant of Hebrew parentage. He said so in my presence.”

Ever since, speculation has been rife. Google “Abraham Lincoln Jewish” and a plethora of articles appear…

The “Case for Jewish Lincoln”:

1. His close friendships with prominent Jews, along with his pro-Jewish policies.

2. While Lincoln never professed belonging to a specific faith, he would often refer to his beliefs citing the 20th chapter of the Book of Exodus – the Ten Commandments.

3. His name was Abraham. His great-grandfather was named Mordechai.

4. His ancestors came from the town of Lincoln in eastern England, established in 1159, it has an interesting Jewish history. During Crusader riots, the Sheriff of Lincoln and the Bishop of London saved the Jews by giving them official protection and taught love of Jews to parishioners. It’s been postulated that when the Jews were ordered out of England, Abraham Lincoln’s ancestors may have been Conversos.

5. When Lincoln was assassinated, Jewish communities sat Shiva. Rabbis around the country eulogized the fallen President.

6. Lincoln was described as having Sephardic features.”

(Source–>http://www.aish.com/j/f/Abraham_Lincoln_and_the_Jews.html)

–=–

“The Melungeon DNA Surname Project by Dr. Elizabeth Hirschman and Dr. Donald Panther Yates state that Abraham Lincoln was of Jewish ancestry. Dr. Hirschman writes “The DNA sample we have came from a Berry male from Tennessee whose ancestors had arrived in Virginia. The marriage of Abraham Lincoln’s parents was performed in the home of a Berry (and not a church) suggesting that not only the Lincolns, but also the Berry’s were of Jewish descent. We believe that many of the very earliest settlers who came to North America from England were actually Sephardic Jews.”

(Source–>http://www.melungeons.com/articles/mar2005.htm)

–=–

This presents an interesting dilemma, as again we must acknowledge the bloodline lineage of all presidents as cousins of George Washington. Abraham Lincoln is listed, among others, as:

7th cousin, 7 times removed from Barack Obama
7th cousin, 5 times removed from George W. Bush
7th cousin 4 times removed from Gerald Ford
11th cousin, 3 times removed from Mitt Romney
13th cousin 3 times removed from George Washington
14th cousin 2 times removed from Robert E. Lee
14th cousin 5 times removed from Thomas Jefferson
15th cousin 4 times removed from William Henry Harrison via Edward I King of England
17th cousin 2 times removed from John Quincy Adams via Edward I King of England
17th cousin 2 times removed from Benjamin Harrison via Edward I King of England
18th cousin 1 time removed from Theodore Roosevelt via Edward I King of England
19th cousin from Franklin Roosevelt via Edward I King of England
20th cousin from John Forbes Kerry
31st great-grandson of Alfred The Great (King of the Anglo-Saxons)
34th great-grandson of Emperor Charlemagne

“According to Burke’s Presidential Families of the United States, Abraham Lincoln is a direct descendant of King Edward I Plantagenet (1239-1307) of England… The genealogical chart shown below traces Lincoln’s line from Edward I (top left) down through Lincoln’s mother, Nancy [Hanks] Lincoln (1784-1818), a family that had its American beginnings in the Philadelphia area but later migrated to Virginia and Kentucky… the aforementioned book… describes other interesting royal connections to American presidents – namely, George Washington as descended from King Henry III (1207-1272); George Washington from King Edward I (1239-1307); Thomas Jefferson from David I, King of Scott (1080-1153); James Monroe from Edward III (1312-1377); John Quincy Adams from Edward I (1239-1307); Ulysses Grant from David I, King of Scots (1080-1153); and, although he was not a president, the genealogical connection of Robert E. Lee to Queen Elizabeth II.  There is also a connection with a more recent president, Richard M. Nixon, and King Edward III, although in that case, the claim goes through an “illegitimate” (but “biological”) offspring, Eleanor Holland, who was born around 1405… Abraham Lincoln can not only be connected as a cousin to the aforementioned presidents and Robert E. Lee, but also to Queen Victoria…”

Remember the chart above listing the Kingdom of Jerusalem as a Plantagenet family claim?

–=–

Abraham LincolnTom Hanks
Lincoln was born on February 12, 1809 to Thomas Lincoln and Nancy Hanks.
Tom Hanks is of the bloodline as most prominent actors are,
being 3rd cousin, 4 times removed of Abe Lincoln.

–=–

According to Ancestry.com, George Clooney is the half-first cousin five times removed from Lincoln, the 16th president. The genealogy website breaks down the connection, explaining the “half” means that two of their ancestors were half-siblings –  Lincoln’s mother Nancy Hanks was the half-sister of Clooney’s 4th great-grandmother Mary Ann Sparrow.

And Hollywood continues to promote a Jewish historical perspective without ever revealing this inconvenient genealogical relationship of its actors turned directors and writers. Steven Spielberg’s new movie Lincoln, for example, should be watched or re-watched with these facts in mind…

So at what point do we distinguish the royal blood from the Ashkenazim “Jewish” blood? Can it be distinguished, if most actors, presidents, congressmen, Supreme Court justices, and corporate CEO’s and founders are labeled as both cousins of royal blood and as “Jewish”? Is it not clear this the distinction is not racial or religious, but must be considered as blood-based? A shared psychopathic blood without the imposition of empathy – one blood to rule them all…

Sources:

http://www.familyforest.com/Kerry_Bush_Cousins.html
http://usspost.com/abraham-lincoln-seventh-cousin-five-times-removed-george-w-bush-69662/
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2207331/How-Tom-Hanks-related-Abraham-Lincoln-presidents-mother.html
http://famouskin.com/_abraham_lincoln_famous_kin.php
http://civilwar.gratzpa.org/2012/12/best-of-2012-the-royal-ancestry-of-president-abraham-lincoln/

–=–

https://i1.wp.com/www.loc.gov/exhibits/haventohome/images/hh0196s.jpg
President Grant Makes a Contribution to Congregation Adas Israel

Adas Israel was the first synagogue building built in the District of Columbia and is closely linked with the beginnings of Jewish life in Washington. President Ulysses S. Grant and other federal and civic officials attended the dedication ceremony on June 9, 1876. Shown here is an official receipt from the Adas Israel “Hebrew” Congregation to the president acknowledging his ten-dollar contribution. In 1969, to make way for Washington’s subway, the first Adas Israel building (which had not functioned as a synagogue since 1907), was moved from its original location at 6th and G Street, N.W., to 3rd and G Street, N.W., where it currently houses the Lillian and Albert Small Jewish Museum and the Jewish Historical Society of Greater Washington.

–=–
The Vice Presidents
–=–


Vice President Joe Biden

“You make up 11 percent of the seats in the United States Congress. You make up one-third of all Nobel laureates… The embrace of immigration” is part of that, as is the involvement of Jews in social justice movements… You can’t talk about the civil rights movement in this country without talking about Jewish freedom riders and Jack Greenberg,” he said, telling a story about seeing a group of Jewish activists at a segregated movie theater in Delaware. “You can’t talk about the women’s movement without talking about Betty Friedan” or American advances in science and technology without mentioning Einstein and Carl Sagan, or music and Gershwin, Bob Dylan and “so, so, so many other people…Think behind of all that, I bet you 85 percent of those changes, whether it’s in Hollywood or social media are a consequence of Jewish leaders in the industry. The influence is immense, the influence is immense. And, I might add, it is all to the good… Jews have also been key to the evolution of American jurisprudence, he continued, namedropping Brandeis, Fortas, Frankfurter, Cardozo, Ginsberg, Breyer, Kagan. You literally can’t. You can’t talk about the recognition of… rights in the Constitution without looking at these incredible jurists that we’ve had.”

–Vice President Joe Biden’s speech for Jewish Heritage Month,
which concerned some Jews as too historically honest


Vice President Joe Biden


Joe Biden with Israeli presidents Netanyahu and Peres


Former Vice President Dick Cheney with Lubavitchers.

–=–
The Executive Cabinet
–=–

Former White House Chief of Staff Rahm (Israel) Emanuel
Now Mayor of Chicago… Always a duel-Israeli/U.S. citizen


Hillary Clinton – First Lady, Senator, and Cheif of Staff


U.S. Chief of Staff Joshua Bolten,


Former U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Stuart Eizenstat

–=–
The Governors
–=–

Governor Jeb Bush (Florida)
meets with Zionist Lubavitch Movement

Governor Mit Romney (Massachusetts)
And at the Wailing wall below

Governor George Pataki (New York), Lubavitcher “Award” ceremony.
by picture of the ultra-racist “Rebbe” [i.e. “Teacher”] in the background).
Also speaking: Hillary Clinton
Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger (California)

Governor Rod Blagojevich flanked by Members of the
Jewish Supremacist Lubavitch Movement

Governor Mike Huckabee with Israeli P.M. Netanyahu
–=–
The Mayors
–=–

“By July, The Three Biggest U.S. Cities Will Have Jewish Mayors”

–Tablet Magazine, May 22, 2013


New Los Angeles Jewish Mayor Eric Garcetti debating on the
Jewish media against a ‘goy’. Hardly seems fair…


Los Angeles Mayor-elect Eric Garcetti attended Beth Chayim Chadashim’s (BCC)
annual awards brunch on June 2 and presented the 2013 Rabbi Erwin and
Agnes Herman Humanitarian Award to BCC honoree David Codell.


Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg (New York)


Former Mayor Giuliani celebrating the Rebbe’ Schneerson


Mayor of New York, Ed Koch meeting with racist Rebbe

Bob Filner on Election Night.
Bob Filner, Jewish Mayor of San Diego


Raum Emanuel, Mayor of Chicago
Former Obama Chief of Staff
Duel citizen of Israel

–=–
The Congress
–=–

 “If Democrats take the House, we’re going to see a huge influx” of Jewish lawmakers,
said Ira Forman, the executive director of the National Jewish Democratic Council.
‘But even on a disappointing night, I think we’ll see a few more Jewish Democrats in the House.’
(Source: http://forward.com/articles/4693/a-tribe-of-candidates-leads-drive-to-retake-house/)

https://i2.wp.com/www.loc.gov/exhibits/haventohome/images/hh0167b_p1s.jpg
“Displayed here are a variety of buttons, stickers, and other election related memorabilia
offering a snapshot of Jewish participation in the political process as members of Congress.”


Senator McCain at the Wailing Wall


Senator Joseph Lieberman with award from “Friends of Lubavitch”


House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer (Left) and
House Speaker John Boehner (Right) with chabads.


Newt Gingrich


Congressman Newt Gingrich, Speaker of the U.S. House

–=–
The Middle Management
–=–

I could go on and on and on but…

–=–
Oh Wait!
We forgot Iran…

–=–

Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (R) speaks as Rabbi Moshe Ber Beck of
Neturei Karta, a fringe Ultra-Orthodox movement within the anti-Zionist bloc,
listens during a meeting in New York, September 24, 2008.
REUTERS/Brendan McDermid (UNITED STATES)


Anti-Zionist Orthodox Jewish Rabbis meet with Irans President Ahmadinejad, 2006

https://i2.wp.com/www.vosizneias.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/ahm6-725x520.jpg

A rabbi from the fringe group Jews United Against Zionism embraces Iranian President and Holocaust denier Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
Rabbi Yisroel Dovid Weiss, anti-Zionist leader of Netrurei Karta

“Why on earth would a rabbi from New York travel to Tehran to embrace
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, a man who says
the Holocaust never happened and that Israel should be annihilated?”
–Fox News article, 2006

The answer?

Rabbi Yisroel Dovid Weiss led the Neturei Karta (New York) delegation
to Iran’s capital on Dec. 11 to participate in a two-day
conference on whether the Holocaust occurred.

–=–

“Zionism is a fundamentally heretical movement which
denies the Divine imperative
that Jews remain in exile until the day
when all mankind will be miraculously redeemed…”

–Weiss told a gathering of protesters in New York City in November, 2006.


Ahmadinejad attends the International Conference on
Global Alliance against Terrorism for a Just Peace in Iran
May 14th, 2011

–=–

Anti-Zionist?

Ahhh… no wonder Iran is on the international Jew and Israel’s shit list!

For Zionism is the blind support of the illegal State of Israel…

–=–

Iranian vice president Mohammad Reza Rahimi publicly stated that
the Talmud teaches how to destroy non-Jews and that
80% of America’s wealth is in the hands of 6% of the world’s Jewish population.

–=–

President of Iran Ahmadinejad meets Jewish Rabbis in NYC, September 2012.

–=–

“There is today a lot of oppression, which a large portion of this is due
to the Zionist. The occupying of Palestine is just a part of this injustice.
But the bigger wrong  is that they are calling themselves Jews and
they justify their horrendous actions  in the name of Judaism”.

–Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
, to anti-Zionist Rabbi Beck
In New York City, September 27, 2012

–=–

“We  are impressed with Your Excellency’s concern and care for the
Jewish community,  a fact that we personally have experienced during our visits in Iran.
We have  visited the Jewish old-age home, the Jewish hospital and we have seen
the Matzo bakery which is a necessity for Jewish people. Also it is well-known that the
Jewish community is represented by its own member of parliament, despite the fact that
the Jewish community does not have the number of constituents
required to have a parliament representative.”

–Senior Rabbi Moshe Dov Beck to Ahmadinejad,
–In New York City, September 27, 2012

–=–

Amongst the issues discussed, the Rabbi stated: “There are many many Jews  worldwide including in occupied Palestine, who are against the whole concept of Zionism and totally in opposition to the State of Israel”. The  rabbi praised the President for his understanding the difference between  Judaism and Zionism. “We  would like to laud Your Excellency for understanding to differentiate between Judaism and Zionism, between good and evil.”

–Senior Rabbi Moshe Dov Beck to Ahmadinejad,
–New York, September 27, 2012

–=–
So Who’s Jew?
–=–

“These Eastern European Jews have neither a racial nor a historic connection
with Palestine. Their ancestors were not inhabitants of the Promised Land.
They are the direct descendants of the people of the Khazar Kingdom.
The Khazars were a non-Semitic, Turko-Mongolian tribe.”

–Mr. Benjamin Freedman, a Jewish industrialist born in New York,

from Economic Council Letter published October 15, 1947

–=–

“Mr. Freedman was challenged, unwisely, by a Zionist objector;
he invited his challenger to go with him to the Jewish room
of the New York Public Library. There they could together examine the
Jewish Encyclopedia volume I pp. 1-12, and the published works of
Graetz, Dubnow, Friedlander, Raisin and many other noted Jewish historians,
which, as well as other non-Jewish authorities,
“establish the fact beyond all possible doubt”.’

–Somewhere South of Suez (1950) Pg 349-350

–=–

“Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a ‘Jew’
or to call a contemporary Jew an Israelite or a Hebrew.”

— “A brief History of the Terms for Jew”, 1980 Jewish Almanac, page 3

–=–

“Khazar, an ancient Turkic speaking people who ruled a large and powerful
state in the steppes North of the Caucasus Mountains from the 7th century
to their demise in the mid 11th century A.D… In the 8th Century it’s
political and religious head… as well as the greater part of the Khazar nobility,
abandoned paganism and converted to Judaism… .”

Encyclopedia Americana (1985)

–=–

“Khazars, confederation of Turkic and Iranian tribes that established a
major commercial empire in the second half of the 6th century,
covering the southeastern section of modern European Russia… |
In the middle of the 8th century the ruling classes adopted Judaism as their religion.”

–Encyclopedia Britannica (15th edition)

–=–

 “Khazars, a non-Semitic, Asiatic, Mongolian tribal nation who emigrated into
Eastern Europe about the first century, who were converted as an entire nation to
Judaism in the seventh century by the expanding Russian nation
which absorbed the entire Khazar population, and who account for the
presence in Eastern Europe of the great numbers of Yiddish-speaking
Jews in Russia, Poland, Lithuania, Galatia, Besserabia and Rumania.”

–The Jewish Encyclopedia

–=–

 “Khazars, a national group of general Turkic type, independent and sovereign in
Eastern Europe between the seventh and tenth centuries C.E.
During part of this time the leading Khazars professed Judaism…
In spite of the negligible information of an archaeological nature,
the presence of Jewish groups and the impact of Jewish ideas in Eastern Europe
are considerable during the Middle Ages. Groups have been mentioned as migrating
to Central Europe from the East often have been referred to as Khazars,
thus making it impossible to overlook the possibility that they originated
from within the former Khazar Empire.”

–The Encyclopedia Judaica (1972)

–=–

“Ashkenazim, the Ashkenazim are one of the two major
divisions of the Jews, the other being the Shephardim.”

–Academic American Encyclopedia (1985)

–=–

“Ashkenazim, the Ashkenazim are the Jews whose ancestors lived in
German lands… it was among Ashkenazi Jews that the idea of political Zionism
emerged, leading ultimately to the establishment of the state of Israel…
In the late 1960s, Ashkenazi Jews numbered some 11 million,
about 84 percent of the world Jewish population.”

–Encyclopedia Americana (1985)

–=–

 “The primary meaning of Ashkenaz and Ashkenazim in Hebrew is
Germany and Germans. This may be due to the fact that the home of
the ancient ancestors of the Germans is Media, which is the Biblical Ashkenaz…
Krauss is of the opinion that in the early medieval ages
the Khazars were sometimes referred to as Ashkenazim…
About 92 percent of all Jews or approximately 14,500,000 are Ashkenazim.”

–The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia

–=–

Khazars {kah’z-ars} The Khazars, a Turkic people, created a commercial and
political empire that dominated substantial parts of South Russia during much of
the 7th through 10th centuries. During the 8th century the Khazar aristocracy and the
kagan (king) were converted to Judaism. The Khazars established their capital at
Itil (or Atil), in the Volga delta, and for four centuries thereafter this Jewish empire held
the balance of power between the Christian Byzantine Empire and the Muslim Caliphate.
The fortified Khazar city of Sarkil on the lower Don River was built with Byzantine help
and served as a crossroads to central Asia. The Khazars controlled many of the trade
routes to the Orient; some of the Radhanites (Jewish merchants from Gaul), for example,
were accustomed to crossing the Khazar empire while traveling to and from China and
India. During the late 10th and early 11th centuries an alliance of Byzantines and
Russians broke the power of the Khazars in the Crimea. In 965, Svyatoslav I,
duke  of Kiev, decisively defeated the Khazar army. Further to the east new
waves of Turkic invadersoverran the remains of the Khazar state.

–New Grolier Encyclopedia

–=–

“It is highly probable that the bulk of the Jew’s ancestors ‘never’ lived in
Palestine ‘at all,’ which witnesses the power of historical assertion over fact.”

–‘The Outline of History’ by H. G. Wells:

–=–

“Now these are the generations of the sons of Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth: and unto
them were sons born after the flood. The sons of Japheth;…the sons of Gomer; Ashkenaz…”

–The Bible (Genesis 10:1-3)

–=–

“Without a complete and accurate knowledge of the origin and history of the
‘Jews’ in Eastern Europe… it is quite impossible for [Christians] to intelligently
understand the harmful influence the Jews have exerted for ten centuries…’
My many years of intensive research established beyond the question of any doubt,
contrary to the generally accepted belief held by Christians, that the ‘Jews’ in
Eastern Europe at any time in their history in Eastern Europe were never the
legendary ‘lost ten tribes’ of Bible lore. That historic fact is incontrovertible.
Relentless research established as equally true that the ‘Jews’ in Eastern Europe
at no time in their history could be correctly regarded as the direct lineal descendants
of the legendary ‘lost ten tribes’ of Bible lore. The ‘Jews’ in Eastern Europe in modern
history cannot legitimately point to a single ancient ancestor who ever
set even a foot on the soil of Palestine in the era of Bible history…
Research also revealed that the ‘Jews’ in Eastern Europe were never ‘Semites,’
are not ‘Semites’ now, nor can they ever be regarded as ‘Semites’ at any future time
by any stretch of the imagination. Exhaustive research also irrevocably rejects as a
fantastic fabrication the generally accepted belief by Christians that the ‘Jews’ in
Eastern Europe are the legendary ‘Chosen People’ so very vocally publicized
by the Christian clergy from their pulpits…”

–‘Facts Are Facts’, by Benjamin Freedman

–=–

“In the year 740 A.D. the Khazars were officially converted to Judaism.
A century later they were crushed by the incoming Slavic-speaking people and
were scattered over central Europe where they were known as Jews.”

–The American Peoples Encyclopedia, 1954

–=–

“Chazars [Khazars]: A people of Turkish origin whose life and history are interwoven
with the very beginnings of the history of the Jews of Russia. The kingdom of the
Chazars was firmly established in most of South Russia long before the foundation
of the Russian monarchy by the Varangians (855)…
Jews have lived on the shores of the Black and Caspian seas since the first centuries
of the common era [after the death of Christ]. Historical evidence points to the region
of the Ural as the home of the Chazars. Among the classical writers of the Middle Ages
they were known as the ‘Chozars,’ ‘Khazirs,’ ‘Akatzirs,’ and ‘Akatirs,’ and in the
Russian chronicles as ‘Khwalisses’ and ‘Ugry Byelyye.’…”

Jewish Encyclopedia, 3rd Edition, 1925

–=–

“Khazars, a national group of general Turkic type, independent and sovereign in
Eastern Europe between the seventh and tenth centuries A.D.
During part of this time the leading Khazars professed Judaism.”

–The Encyclopedia Judaica, Vol. 10, (1971)

–=–

“Khazars, a medieval people, probably related to the VolgaBulgars, whose
ruling class adopted Judaism during the 8th cent. The Khazars seem to have
emerged during the 6th cent., from the vast nomadic Hun (Turki) empire which
stretched from the steppes of Eastern Europe and the Volga basin to the Chinese frontier.
Although it is often claimed that allusions to the Khazars are found as early as 200 C.E.,
actually they are not mentioned until 627… Most Jewish Historians date the
conversion of the Khazar King to Judaism during the first half of this century {A.D.}…”

–The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia

–=–

“This, of course, is inspired by the story of the Covenant in Genesis; and it implies
that the Khazars too claimed the status of a Chosen Race, who made their own Covenant
with the Lord, even though they [Khazars] were not descended from Abraham’s seed…
He cannot, and does not, claim for them [the Khazars] Semitic descent, he traces their
[Khazars] ancestry not to Shem, but to Noah’s third son, Japheth or more precisely
to Japheth’s grandson, Togarma, the ancestor of all Turkish tribes…
We have found in the family registers of our fathers,’ Joseph asserts boldly,
‘that Togarma had ten sons, and the names of their offspring are as follows:
Uigur, Dursu, Avars, Huns, Basilii, Tarniakh, Khazars, Zagora, Bulgars, Sabir.
We [Khazars] are the sons of Khazar, the seventh…'”

–The Thirteenth Tribe, (Jewish author) Arthur Koestler, pages 58-82

–=–

(Source for some of the above quotes–>http://www.iamthewitness.com/doc/Ashkenazis.are.not.the.descendants.of.the.Ancient.Israelites.htm)

–=–

Just in Europe and Russia alone, the (Khazarian) Zionist Jews have been banished over 47 times in the last 1000 years (not including this last century):

Mainz, 1012 – France, 1182 – Upper Bavaria, 1276 – England, 1290 – France, 1306 – France, 1322 – Saxony, 1349 – Hungary, 1360 – Belgium, 1370 – Slovakia, 1380 – France, 1394 – Austria, 1420 – Lyons, 1420 – Cologne, 1424 – Mainz, 1438 – Augsburg, 1438 – Upper Bavaria, 1442 – Netherlands, 1444 – Brandenburg, 1446 – Mainz, 1462 – Mainz, 1483 – Warsaw, 1483 – Spain, 1492 – Italy, 1492 – Lithuania, 1495 – Portugal, 1496 – Naples, 1496 – Navarre, 1498 – Nuremberg, 1498 – Brandenburg, 1510 – Prussia, 1510 – Genoa, 1515 – Naples, 1533 – Italy, 1540 – Naples, 1541 – Prague, 1541 – Genoa, 1550 – Bavaria, 1551 – Prague, 1557 – Papal States, 1569 – Hungary, 1582 – Hamburg, 1649 – Vienna, 1669 – Slovakia, 1744 –  Moravia, 1744 – Bohemia, 1744 – Moscow, 1891.

—Excerpted from “The Synagogue of Satan” by Andrew Carrington Hitchcock. This was not the end, as we all know from recent history.

–=–

“It can hardly be an accident that antagonism directed against the Jews is to be found pretty much everywhere in the world where Jews and non-Jews are associated. And as the Jews are the common element of the situation it would seem probable, on the face of it, that the cause will be found in them rather than in the widely varying groups which feel this antagonism.”

Professor Jesse H. Holmes, writing in “The American Hebrew”.

–=–

“If this hostility, even aversion, had only been shown towards the Jews at one period and in one country, it would be easy to unravel the limited causes of this anger, but this race has been on the contrary an object of hatred to all the peoples among whom it has established itself. It must be therefore, since the enemies of the Jews belonged to the most diverse races, since they lived in countries very distant from each other; since they were ruled by very different laws, governed by opposite principles, since they had neither the same morals, nor the same customs, since they were animated by unlike dispositions which did not permit them to judge of anything in the same way, it must be therefore that the general cause of anti-Semitism has always resided in Israel itself and not in those who have fought against Israel.”

—Bernard Lazare, noted Jewish author, from his book “L’antisemitisme son histoire et ses causes”, published in 1894, regarding the history of the expulsions of Jews from so many cultures.

–=–
Zionism and Patriotism
–=–

https://i2.wp.com/www.loc.gov/exhibits/haventohome/images/hh0243s.jpg

“A successful lawyer, Louis D. Brandeis (1856-1941) became active in the nascent American Zionist movement on the eve of World War I. In 1914, he became chair of the Provisional Executive Committee for General Zionist Affairs, the leader of American Zionism. His participation served to legitimize the movement in the eyes of American Jewry and other Americans. He believed strongly that Zionism and American patriotism were compatible, a view expressed in the pamphlet displayed here. In 1916, Louis Brandeis became the Supreme Court’s first Jewish justice.

Today, statism, nationalism, and patriotism are socialist/fascist tools used to blindly trick the people into romanticizing about a country called America that somehow still exists with eminent constitutional intent – one that will somehow be taken back through non-violent begging. In my future essay, we will learn that America was never the people’s country in the first place, and that there is nothing to take back!

–=–

“Beware the leader who bangs the drums of war in order to whip the citizenry into a patriotic fervor, for patriotism is indeed a double-edged sword. It both emboldens the blood, just as it narrows the mind. And when the drums of war have reached a fever pitch and the blood boils with hate and the mind has closed, the leader will have no need in seizing the rights of the citizenry. Rather, the citizenry, infused with fear and blinded by patriotism, will offer up all of their rights unto the leader and gladly so. How do I know? For this is what I have done. And I am Caesar.”

–Julius Caesar

–=–

These poor demonized outcasts try to warn the people of the world,
even as the world governments all defend Israel to the death…

http://www.nkusa.org/activities/demonstrations/israeliflag.cfm
Anti-Zionism is anti-Israel… here Jews burn the Israeli flag

https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-gJAYVVB0pKs/UGbUElB_NcI/AAAAAAAAK2Y/LWp_Bjjrlhk/s800/250px-Members_of_Neturei_Karta_Orthodox_Jewish_group_protest_against_Israel.jpg

–=–
For those who have eyes to see, let them see,
and for those who have ears to hear, let them hear.
–=–

We stand on the threshold of a cultural genocide that targets all members of the human race. As the Talmud and Protocols teach, this effort must be done covertly and most importantly incrementally so as to be mostly unseen by the goy (non-Jew).

With this understanding and comprehension, it should be obvious that peace can be accomplished in the world only through the expulsion of this minority from the governments and seats of authority of the world. Authority is nothing more than permission of the people. And with the understanding that law requires force, the nations of the world had best force the international Jew out of their governments before their strength in numbers are lulled into insignificance.

This effort must be universal, for the powers of all nations rest in their hands. The price for resistance is historically evident in the outcome of World War 1 and 2. The power of this Masonic League of Nations now called the United Nations are united to further the Zionist cause, against the informed consent and interests of the people of each individual nation. The peacekeeping forces of the United Jewish Nations are the armies of all usurped nations under Jewish rule and influence. And so individually and with individual sovereignty, the people of those nations must rise together for the common cause of expelling this enemy of all people.

A lofty goal indeed for a world masterfully entertained and brainwashed by the very entity that enslaves them and tells them they are liberated and have freedom…

Of course the legal definition of freedom is “to obey the law”!!!

This blind patriotism and nationalism creates masses of mindless adherants to an obviously lawless set of international Jewish lawmakers.

–=–

Stay tuned, freinds, for this is only scratching the surface. My three-part research project on the true Masonic roots of the United States and its constitution is coming close to being finished. What you have just read has everything to do with that history, with the foundations of Freemasonry, with the establishment and support of Zionism and Israel (Kingdom of Jerusalem), and the fruition of the planned World War III as penned by the Masons themselves at the rebuilding of the sacred Temple of Solomon upon and over the holy Muslim site on the Mount to incite war.

I will post the link to that project here when completed, entitled Cracking The Cult Of The Constitution

.

–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com
–Thursday, June 20th, 2013

Today’s Creatures From Jekyll Island


One of the things that the “truth” movement does best is to perpetrate and over-propagate myths and legends.

While a myth is something that just isn’t the truth, a legend is based on a grain of truth that has been blown way out of proportion into being almost god-like in its power – able to create whole movements based on false facts.

Of course, the favorite “truther” myths and legends seem to circulate around the creation of and the continuing story of the Federal Reserve System. In a previous post, I broke down the legal structure of the Federal Reserve, including the Federal Reserve Act and the reality of what an “independent agency of government” actually is (The Postal Service, Social Security Administration, Federal Trade Commission, Federal Elections Commission, Securities And Exchange Commission, and the Federal Reserve System are all examples of “independent agencies of government”.) They are Federal government corporations, created by Congress, and given the limited power of “rule-making” while still bound by congressional “law” – and there is just no way to get around these facts. All this and the sources you need are right here:

(Link–> https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2012/06/23/the-incontrovertible-conundrum-of-dr-ron-paul/)

But obviously, the legend still outlives the reality…

My favorite part of the Fed legend is the story of the men who gathered at Jekyll Island to supposedly “create” the Federal Reserve.

While it is certainly true that men congregated to create a bill that could then be eventually run through and passed by congress, the legend of that meeting is one of the more discrediting aspects of the movement. In fact, it unfortunately gives people the false impression that this meeting at Jekyll Island was some rare event in history – as if the rest of the time in government, bills and acts are created by the actual congressmen who spend days and weeks composing and signing them. This is far from the truth.

Was there a meeting on that island? Of course. This fact is not in question.

Did these men create the Federal Reserve? Of course not. They simply wrote a draft of a bill that would take some three years to finally be rewritten, amended, and passed by congress. Congress created the Federal Reserve, which was finalized by then President Woodrow Wilson’s signature. Government, in fact, created the Federal Reserve Board and banks in committee after the Federal Reserve Act was signed, just as it was instructed to do by the Act.

Did the bill pass by the vote of just a few house members on a late stormy night when most of congress was at home sleeping or celebrating the holidays? For this myth, I simply did a bit of simple, logical research….

–=–

“The House passed the bill 298-60 on the evening of Dec. 22, 1913″

“The Senate began debate the following day at 10am, and passed it 43-25 at 2:30pm.”

“Wilson signs currency bill,” –New York Times, pp. 1-2, Dec. 24, 1913.

Oh, yeah… the legend seems to forget the check and balance rule that when a bill passes the house, it must also pass the Senate and be signed by the President. So in reality, The Federal Reserve Act didn’t get “created” until that very stroke of the presidents pen. And since bills go from the House to the Senate, and since the Senate then passed the bill as well, and since the bill then went to conference for final amendment and approval, we can’t very well state with any historical accuracy that the Federal Reserve Act was created on a dark stormy night in the House after all of the congress had already left for the holidays, now can we? For the Senate met the next day at 10 am! We can’t just dismiss or not mention the rest of the legislative process for the fulfillment of our legend.

But we also can’t dismiss the journals of the House and Senate, which clearly show the number of votes cast as official record. In other words, when role call was announced, the following was the response of congressmen in attendance for the final vote on the conference report (amended version of the Federal Reserve Act Bill):

House: Bill passed the house on September 18th by a vote of 282-85 with only 3 democrats voting against it.
Senate: The Senate passed the Federal Reserve bill, 54-34 on December 19th with full Democratic support.
Conference Committees: agreed and on December 22nd and 23rd the two houses ratified the bill and the President signed the measure as follows…

1) Dec. 22, 1913 – House agreed to conference report on H.R. 7837 by 298 yeas to 60 nays and 76 not voting but with 34 announced pairs.
(Link–> http://www.llsdc.org/attachments/files/102/FRA-LH_v51-CR-1464.pdf)

2) Dec. 23, 1913 – Senate agreed to conference report on H.R. 7837 by 43 yeas to 25 nays and 27 not voting but with 13 announced pairs.
(Link–> http://www.llsdc.org/attachments/files/103/FRA-LH_v51-CR-1487-1488-SEN.pdf)

3) Dec. 23, 1913 – President signs H.R. 7837, the “Federal Reserve Act”.
(Link–> http://www.llsdc.org/attachments/files/105/FRA-LH-PL63-43.pdf).

Does this sound like congress was home for the holidays when the Federal Reserve was created? 76 members out of a total of 434 were listed as not present for the vote. This means that approximately 18% of House members were not present for the vote, which as it turns out is not at all uncommon. It also means that even if these 76 members were present to vote, and they all voted nay on the act, the total votes would have stood at 136 nays, and 298 yeas. This would still have been well over a 2/3’s majority vote in favor of the Federal Reserve Act by the House Members.

The New York Times then reported:

“WASHINGTON, Dec. 23.–President Wilson signed the Currency bill at 6:02 o’clock this evening, following the passage of the conference report by the Senate in the afternoon by a vote of 43 to 25, and the House’s approval of that report last night…”

(Link–> http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9B04E3DB173DE633A25757C2A9649D946296D6CF&scp=1&sq=+%22currency+bill%22+AND+%226%3A02%22&st=p) – Note that you may download full article here as well.

So that you can understand how common this absenteeism is in legislatures across the United States, I’d very much like for you to watch this coverage of the Texas Legislature, perhaps my favorite tool to wake people up to the fraud that is government:

Note that since the legislature makes the rules, the legislature very seldom enforces their own rules.

The point here is that if one pours through the journals of the congress, one will continuously see the fact that congress is never full. Absenteeism is a normal aspect of the legislature.

Is this right or wrong?

I’m not here to tell you what is right or wrong, though I personally believe that no bill should be passed in congress without 100% attendance and vote. What I am here to do is present fact -vs- fiction. And the fact is that nothing out of the ordinary happened on that night (when only 18% of the Congress didn’t vote for the conference report on the Federal Reserve Act) and that it was indeed passed quite legally. Good or bad? That’s not the issue. It’s good for some, bad for others. I’m not here for that. Good and bad are not facts, they are opinions. My opinion, so as to be clear, is that the Federal Reserve Act was both good and bad, but that its management is very bad. But more importantly, my opinion of congress and the President, both past and present, is that they are acting in treason to the people of the united states of America under the Lieber Code (martial law) and that nothing they do is lawful in America in the first place. But, they are acting legally in the United States under their own laws, which is outside of the united states of America, in Washington D.C. They are the provisional government of the occupying military force called the United States. So my opinion is based on these facts, as a man who understands that he is under martial law and that since the Civil War, the government of the United States is illegitimate under duress.

Interestingly, because of this fact, the ludicrous pursuit of Obama’s birth certificate to prove “citizenship” is a fallacious waste of time. For under military rule, there is no law that requires any head of any corporation to be a natural born citizen of the united states of America in the government of the federal corporation called the “United States”. In fact, there is no law period! You see, there is no such thing as being naturally born in the “United States” corporation. The United States are a corporation, and there is nothing natural or human about it. The President is the CEO of the United States, not the united states of America.

And as it turns out, the myth of future martial law as a result of “civil unrest” is one of the few instances where the myth covers up an already existing fact that is much worse than the myth. In this occupied land, the “United States” military already has bases in all 50 States, which are federal territories of the United States, signifying the presence of martial law according to the laws of war in the Lieber Code. And so the fear of martial law covers up the actual ongoing military rule and occupation that already exists! Just one more quiver in the educational void of the truth movement. The Lieber Code directly influenced both the Hague Convention deliberations and the Geneva Conventions in the mid-twentieth century, and was originally put into effect as General Orders 100, on April 24, 1863, by Lincoln’s secretary of war, Edwin Stanton.

By the way, I feel perfectly justified in saying these things because of the FACT that I was once equally as naive as the rest of us; telling people to wake up even as I was completely asleep. A cursory glance at some of my first posts on this blog is proof enough of my own ignorance just a year ago, and of the arrogance that comes with being an nonfactual truther. So getting offended at my writing is pointless. I still have a lifetime of learning to overcome my own current ignorance, and I no longer fool myself into thinking that I know even a fraction of what is.

My intention is only to point out what isn’t, so as to make it easier for both you and myself to see what is. So bare with me…

For more on this, may I suggest my previous research here:

(Link –> https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2012/07/04/why-the-supreme-court-claims-obamacare-is-constitutional/)

And for more on the Lieber Code and our continued military rule since the Civil War, see here:

(Link –> http://archive.org/stream/TheCivilWarWithNoEnding_232/TheCivilWarWithNoEnding#page/n0/mode/2up)

One last example as to the myths that get passed around without verification.

This quote is often put forward to be said by Woodrow Wilson after signing the Federal Reserve Act.

“I am a most miserable man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A fantastic industrial nation is controlled by its system of confidence. Our system of confidence is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men…”

But when we actually examine where this quote comes from, we can quite easily and logically deduct the fact that this quote could not have been said by Woodrow Wilson any time close to or after the date of the signing of the Federal Reserve Act in December of 1913!

Page 185 of “The New Freedom” by Woodrow Wilson (1913, Doubleday, Page & Co) has this quote.

For a description of this book, we read: “The New Freedom comprises the campaign speeches and promises of Woodrow Wilson in the 1912 presidential campaign.” Also note that this book was copyrighted and published earlier in the year 1913.

How is it then that this quote can possibly be attributed to President Wilson after signing the Federal Reserve Act in the last week of that year, on December 23rd, 1913?

Does nobody verify facts anymore?

It turns out that Wilson didn’t write or say the phrase, “I am a most miserable man. I have unwittingly ruined my country.”, at least that anyone can find.

In Chapter 8 of “The New Freedom”, we find written:

“A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is privately concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men who, even if their action be honest and intended for the public interest, are necessarily concentrated upon the great undertakings in which their own money is involved and who necessarily, by very reason of their own limitations, chill and check and destroy genuine economic freedom.”

And then in Chapter 9, we read:

“We have restricted credit, we have restricted opportunity, we have controlled development, and we have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated, governments in the civilized world–no longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and the duress of small groups of dominant men.”

And as of yet, I can’t seem to find a reference for the “unhappy man ruining his country” quote.

But someone out there put it all together, shortening sentences and blending intent, to read as such:

“I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated governments in the civilized world. No longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men.”

And this quote is used in such movies as Freedom To Fascism, Zeitgeist, The Money Masters, etc…

On “The Money Masters” website, the quote for that movie is listed as:

Despite these warnings, Woodrow Wilson signed the 1913 Federal Reserve Act. A few years later he wrote:I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit…’ etc…”

(Source –> http://www.themoneymasters.com/the-money-masters/famous-quotations-on-banking/)

For the movie, “America: Freedom To Fascism”, the quote was:

“I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is now controlled by its system of credit. We are no longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men.”

Among other misquotes, Mr. Russo also twisted this quote completely out of context when he read:

“We can’t be so fixated on our desire to preserve the rights of ordinary Americans.” –Bill Clinton, March 11, 1993

What Clinton actually said (on March 1, 1993) was:

“We can’t be so fixated on our desire to preserve the rights of ordinary Americans to legitimately own handguns and rifles—it’s something I strongly support—we can’t be so fixated on that that we are unable to think about the reality of life that millions of Americans face on streets that are unsafe, under conditions that no other nation—no other nations—has permitted to exist.”

(Source –> http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=46264)

How can one then trust any other quotes or references in such “documentaries” if such blatant misquotes with unverifiable information are placed into them as “historical fact”, and then parroted by “truthers” to people who might actually verify the lie? It is my opinion that a documentary is supposed to document facts, not parade half-truths for the benefit of emotional response.

Again, if almost the entirety of Wilson’s quote was written in a book that was published well before the Federal Reserve Acts was signed, then how could it be Woodrow Wilson’s thoughts “after signing the Federal Reserve Act“, as so many have quoted without verification?

The “truth” is that it can’t.

And to assign some sense of heroism to the very man who signed the Federal Reserve Act, making it law, after he agreed to do so for campaign donations and support to become president in the first place, is a stain on the reliability of the good people who then quote these lies as truth. In fact, the only logical conclusion is that Wilson was stating these facts about the banking system to prepare and predicatively program people to except the fact that the Federal Reserve was going to be created to solve all of these problems that he wrote about in this book. What a twisted history and tangled web we “truthers” can weave…

–=–

Another aspect of this legend of the Federal Reserve story is the strange notion that the Federal Reserve System somehow operates outside of government control, that it owns its own assets, and that some rouge “bankers” or “elite” own some fictitious stock in the Federal Reserve that no one can see, touch, or verify. I’ve even seen lists going around listing certain men (international bankers) as shareholders of the bank. Despite the fact that the current Federal Reserve Act as annotated in U.S. CODE has been amended by Congress numerous times in every decade since its inception, and is now a completely different “creature” than it was at its creation, even the original Federal Reserve Act states quite clearly that these myths about the legend are simply not true…

Here is an excerpt from the original Federal Reserve Act:

SEC. 2… Under regulations to be prescribed by the organization committee, every national banking association in the United States is hereby required, and every eligible bank in the United States and every trust company within the District of Columbia, is hereby authorized to signify in writing, within sixty days after the passage of this Act, its acceptance of the terms and provisions hereof. When the organization committee shall have designated the cities in which Federal reserve banks are to be organized, and fixed the geographical limits of the Federal reserve districts, every national banking association within that district shall be required within thirty days after notice from the organization committee, to subscribe to the capital stock of such Federal reserve bank in a sum equal to six per centum of the paid-up capital stock and surplus of such bank….

Any national bank failing to signify its acceptance of the terms of this Act within the sixty days aforesaid, shall cease to act as a reserve agent, upon thirty days’ notice, to be given within the discretion of the said organization committee or of the Federal Reserve Board.

Should any national banking association in the United States now organized fail within one year after the passage of this Act to become a member bank or fail to comply with any of the provisions of this Act applicable thereto, all of the rights, privileges, and franchises of such association granted to it under the national-bank Act, or under the provision of this Act, shall be thereby forfeited….

No individual, copartnership, or corporation other than a member bank of its district shall be permitted to subscribe for or to hold at any time more than $20,000 par value of stock in any Federal reserve bank. Such stock shall be known as public stock and may be transferred on the books of the Federal reserve bank by the chairman of the board of directors of such bank….

SEC. 3. Each Federal reserve bank shall establish branch banks within the Federal reserve district in which it is located
and may do so in the district of any Federal reserve bank which may have been suspended.

* * * * * * * *

SEC. 5. The capital stock of each Federal reserve bank shall be divided into shares of $IOO each….

* * * * * * * *

SEC. 7. After all necessary expenses of a Federal reserve bank have been paid or provided for, the stockholders shall be entitled to receive an annual dividend of six per centum on the paid-in capital stock, which dividend shall be cumulative. After the aforesaid dividend claims have been fully met, all the net earnings shall be paid to the United States as a franchise tax, except that one-half of such net earnings shall be paid into a surplus fund until it shall amount to forty per centum of the paid-in capital stock of such bank.

The net earnings derived by the United States from Federal reserve banks shall, in the discretion of the Secretary, be used to supplement the gold reserve held against outstanding United States notes, or shall be applied to the reduction of the outstanding bonded indebtedness of the United States under regulations to be prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury….

So after reading this, does it sound to you like “bankers” took over the banking system of the United States?

No. In fact, Individual banks were REQUIRED to purchase stock to be a Federal Reserve Member to continue operating as a reserve bank of the United States. In other  words, if any bank wished to continue to create funny money legally through the United States, they had to become members of the Central bank of the United States. So technically, government actually created a system to control bankers.

But what needs to be known is that government, over many, many decades, has slowly invested in the ownership stock of all of these banks and other corporations and collectively, governments have become the major share holder of these banks. Government is where the public wealth is – 100’s of millions of people’s wealth exacted and extorted daily – and the power to control that wealth as well as the regulation of the banking industry in one consolidated government was the collective goal.

Please get this through your head… I am not here trying to convince you that government isn’t controlled by outside influences, bankers, elites, or whatever the legend of today names these men as… I am simply telling you the facts: The Federal Reserve System is a government agency that is politically independent (not naturally or lawfully independent), no differently than the Post Office or the Social Security System or many other independent agencies of government, and that it is government that holds the wealth and stock ownership of most corporations and banks.

There are no ownership shareholders of the Federal Reserve because the Federal Reserve does not offer ownership stock. Wallmart and Monsanto offer “public” ownership stock, for which people and government has been purchasing for decades. But government corporations do not offer public (ownership) stock, which means that government is not owned.

Thus, the myth that “corporations own the government” can also be dismissed here. It is quite the opposite, actually. The word “own” is the legal holding of stock of a corporation. So while there is very much a symbiotic relationship between corporations (including banks) and government, the fact is that government owns shares in corporations, and not the other way around. The reality is that at any time government, with the swish of a pen or the dumping of its collective stock, can indeed shut down or make insignificant any corporation it chooses to. On the other hand, no corporation can do the same to government.

These are the facts. And while these facts do not preclude the idea that a bunch of evil bankers and corporate elitists control the government from beyond its borders, they do show quite clearly that while government may be controlled by these men, government is not “owned” by these men. The distinction here is perhaps the most important one I can think of, and yet it is the most overlooked by the creators of legends and myths. Is it any wonder that the masses, with the help of the government-owned media (through stock investment), calls us “conspiracy theorists”? If 99 out of 100 “truthers” are purposefully led into the mythological beliefs we are uncovering here, and then present those beliefs as fact (as I once did) without verifying these stories of false history, then how can the masses of people ever be persuaded to “wake up”? For waking up into just another dream-state is never going to accomplish anything – and belief in mythology and legends is not truth!

–=–

We also see in the Federal Reserve Act that earnings shall be used to supplement the gold reserve held against outstanding U.S. notes. What does this mean? After all, the myth states that there is no gold in Fort Knox, right?

As of 2009, the gold reserve held as collateral by the Treasury against outstanding United States notes was listed in the Federal Reserve Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, pages 453 and 490.

(LINK–> http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/rptcongress/annual09/pdf/ar09.pdf)

Please note that the Federal Reserve is required to publish its audit of its financial statements just as every other government agency is in the country – NO EXCEPTION –  and this can be verified in the Federal Reserve act and in U.S. CODE here:

Section 11B. Annual Independent Audits of Federal Reserve Banks and Board

The Board shall order an annual independent audit of the financial statements of each Federal reserve bank and the Board.

[12 USC 248b. As added by act of Nov. 12, 1999 (113 Stat. 1475).]

But wait a minute, the Fed doesn’t get audited, does it? Isn’t that what the myth states, that the legend called the Federal Reserve doesn’t get audited because it is a rouge agency and out of control of the government?

Read the answer to this question for yourself, here: –> http://www.federalreserve.gov/faqs/about_12784.htm

And then go ahead and download the audit of the Federal Reserve, which is listed on its site as:

“Audited Annual Financial Statements of the Federal Reserve System (annual statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2011, and 2010)”

Here’s the link for the audit of each individual Fed bank, as well as the Board–> http://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/bst_fedfinancials.htm#audited

It’s really simple and a generally accepted practice for governments and private corporations you see, to create their own financial statements and have them audited by an outside accounting firm. This was the case even when The Creature From Jekyll Island was written, and for many decades before. In fact, the Federal Reserve has been audited since it was created.

Also, the Government Accounting Office in its 2009 CAFR reports for the Federal Government shows the same exact information, listing $11,037,000,000 worth of gold at a fixed (contracted) price of $42.2222 per troy ounce being held as collateral for United States notes. This can also be found on page 61 of the Federal Government’s CAFR.

(LINK–> http://www.gao.gov/financial/fy2010/10notes.pdf)

With a little math, we can calculate that as of 2009 fiscal year, the Federal Reserve was holding 261,498,900 troy ounces of gold as collateral for United States notes. And as the price of this pledged gold is fixed at a statutory value of $42.2222 per troy ounce, that legal value as listed is a bit over $11 billion dollars.

However, if we were to consider that U.S. gold as valued by the market price of $1654 per troy ounce today, August 30, 2012, that gold would be worth $432,519,180,600 dollars. $432.5 billion! Ironically, and perhaps purposefully, the “gold certificates” held by the Federal Reserve System – which are redeemable for the physical gold listed as payable by the Treasury –  these gold certificates have been used in the markets as swaps, using the market value of the physical gold as collateral for other trades. In other words, while the physical gold is force-valued at $42.2222 per troy ounce by statute, the gold certificates representing that actual physical gold in contract can then be used in certificate swaps at the gold’s market value – at $1654 per troy ounce – because the certificates represent the gold itself, not the contracted price! The collateral is being used as collateral!

Thus, the myth that the Federal Reserve and the United States Treasury are somehow at odds with each other or in some strange form of competition is fairly ludicrous. We are talking about legal organized crime here. And no rational criminal would set up a system to impede the implementation of that criminal activity. In fact, it states very clearly here that “all the net earnings shall be paid to the United States as a franchise tax.

Think about it… if “The net earnings derived by the United States from Federal reserve banks shall, in the discretion of the Secretary, be used to supplement the gold reserve held against outstanding United States notes, and thenet earnings shall be paid to the United States as a franchise tax, where is the competition?

This makes a causal loop where profits (earnings) of the bank get paid to the Federal government and then those payments get used to increase the physical gold held by the Federal government which creates more swappable gold certificates to collateralize the United States notes which will make even more profits (earnings) for the Federal Reserve which will be paid back again to the United States as a tax and can buy more gold and swap more certificates making more profits and so on and so forth– ad infinity.

Does this sound like a competition or non-cooperation to you?

As far as the Fort Knox myth:

The gold stored in the Depository is in the form of standard mint bars of almost pure gold or coin gold bars resulting from the melting of gold coins. These bars are about the size of an ordinary building brick, but are somewhat smaller. The approximate dimensions are 7 x 3-5/8 x 1-3/4 inches. The fine gold bars contain approximately 400 troy ounces of gold, worth $16,888.00 (based on the statutory price of $42.22 per ounce). The avoirdupois weight of the bars is about 27-1/2 pounds. They are stored in the vault compartments without wrappings. When the bars are handled, great care is exercised to avoid abrasion of the soft metal…”

(Top) “A large amount of the United States’ gold reserves is stored in the vault of the Fort Knox Bullion Depository, one of the institutions under the supervision of the Director of the United States Mint. The remaining gold reserves are held in the Philadelphia Mint, the Denver Mint, the West Point Bullion Depository and the San Francisco Assay Office, also facilities of the United States Mint.”

(Source –> http://www.treasury.gov/about/education/Pages/fort-knox.aspx)

Read this clearly… The gold of the United States is held in several depositories, Fort Knox being just one of them. It is listed at the same statutory price that is pledged to the Federal Reserve as collateral for United States notes. And there is absolutely no proof whatsoever that this gold is not being hoarded in Fort Knox or one of these other installations. Seriously, what purpose would it serve to lie about this? Why the pervasive myth?

Understanding the connections and financial reporting of that gold and how it is pledged as (collateral), and seeing these audited reports match up gives us a look into the reality of the situation.

And, as for the audits of the gold in Fort Knox, we read:

Appendix D: Continuing Audit of the United States Government-Owned Gold Summary

A continuing audit of the United States gold stock has been underway since 1975 at the direction of the Secretary of the Treasury. When it is completed in 1984, it will have covered all the gold for which Treasury is accountable and will have involved an estimated 26 man years of work. This audit, together with a special audit of the gold stock conducted by the General Accounting Office in 1974 and audits by examiners of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, has (as of September 30, 1981) covered more than 212.7 million fine troy ounces of gold. This represents over 80 percent of the total amount of United States-owned gold of 264.1 million fine troy ounces. No discrepancies have been found in Treasury records with regard to any gold in permanent storage.

Current Audit Program

On September 23, 1974, members of Congress were invited to inspect the United States gold stock stored in the Ft. Knox bullion depository. Following Congressional inspection, which involved removal of the seals and opening selected vault compartments, a special audit was conducted in September and October 1974. The General Accounting Office (GAO), in cooperation with auditors from the Bureau of the Mint, Bureau of Government Financial Operations (BGFO), United States Customs Service, and the Treasury Department’s Office of Audit conducted an audit of 21 percent of the gold bars stored at Ft. Knox. In the report of the audit, the GAO recommended that consideration be given to performing continuing audits of the gold in custody of the Mint. That recommendation is the basis for the current audit program. On June 3, 1975, Treasury Secretary Simon issued Treasury Department Order No. 234-1 authorizing and directing the Fiscal Assistant Secretary, with the cooperation and assistance of the Director of the Mint, to conduct a continuing audit of United States Government-owned gold for which the Department of the Treasury is accountable.

The Fiscal Assistant Secretary established a Committee for Continuing Audits of United States Government-owned Gold to provide guidelines and general direction to ad hoc gold audit committees. The Committee for Continuing Audits is headed by the Director, Audit Staff of the Treasury’s Bureau of Government Financial Operations (BGFO) and includes the Chief of Internal Audit of the Bureau of the Mint and the Assistant General Auditor of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York…

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 20. 1974

INSPECTION OF GOLD AT FORT KNOX

The inspection by Members of Congress on September 23, 1974 of U.S. gold stocks stored at the Fort Knox (Ky.) Bullion Depository marks a unique departure from the long standing and rigidly enforced policy of absolutely no visitors, Mrs. Mary Brooks, Director of the Mint announced today.

“On April 28, 1943, President Franklin D. Roosevelt inspected the Bullion Depository,” Mrs. Brooks said. “His visit was the one and only time a gold vault was opened for inspection for anyone other than authorized personnel.”

“The Congressional inspection adheres to the new open door policy of the government announced by President Ford. Treasury Secretary William E. Simon issued the invitation to Congressmen to inspect the gold at Fort Knox. By also inviting the press to witness the Congressional inspection, the Mint is clearing away the cobwebs and re-assuring the public that their gold is intact and safe. For the first time photographing is being permitted inside the Depository.”

After the Congressional inspection, the Bullion Depository will once again be closed to visitors.

On September 24, 1974, a special settlement (audit) is scheduled to begin and at its conclusion a report on the audit will be issued.

The audit will be performed by a committee of auditors from the U. S. General Accounting Office (GAO) and the Department of the Treasury. The auditors from the Treasury will be drawn from the Office of the Secretary, the Bureau of Government Financial Operations, the U. S. Customs Service, and the Bureau of the Mint. In addition, the committee will include technicians from the Bureau of the Mint who are trained in assaying and weighing gold bullion.

The monetary gold stock of the United States totals 276.0 million fine troy ounces valued at $11. 7 billion at the official rate of $42.2222 per fine troy ounce, and is stored in various federal depositories (table attached), the largest of which is at Fort Knox. Kentucky. 147. 4 million fine troy ounces, valued at $6.2 billion, is stored in 13 vault compartments at the Fort Knox Bullion Depository.

CONGRESSIONAL MEMBERS INSPECTING GOLD AT FORT KNOX SEPTEMBER 23. 1974

SENATE
Walter D. Huddleston. (D) Kentucky

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Clair W. Burgener. (R) California
John B. Conlan. (R) Arizona
Philip M. Crane. (R) Illinois
Walter E. Fauntroy. (D) District of Columbia
Angelo D. Roncallo. (R) New York
John H. Rousselot, (R) California
Gene Snyder. (R) Kentucky
Chalmers P. Wylie. (R) Ohio

(Source –> http://search.yahoo.com/r/_ylt=A0oG7hxYfEJQvkIA6TVXNyoA;_ylu=X3oDMTE1NTd2M2gwBHNlYwNzcgRwb3MDMQRjb2xvA2FjMgR2dGlkA1ZJUDAyMl8xODA-/SIG=13la6qcdu/EXP=1346563288/**http%3a//www.goldensextant.com/Resources%2520PDF/Gold%2520Commission%2520Report%2520Annex%2520D.pdf)

And then the the U.S. Mint states:

“The United States Bullion Depository Fort Knox, Kentucky:

  • Amount of present gold holdings: 147.3 million ounces.
  • The only gold removed has been very small quantities used to test the purity of gold during regularly scheduled audits. Except for these samples, no gold has been transferred to or from the Depository for many years.
  • The gold is held as an asset of the United States at book value of $42.22 per ounce.
  • The Depository opened in 1937; the first gold was moved to the depository in January that year.
  • Highest gold holdings this century: 649.6 million ounces (December 31, 1941).
  • Size of a standard gold bar: 7 inches x 3 and 5/8 inches x 1 and 3/4 inches.
  • Weight of a standard gold bar: approximately 400 ounces or 27.5 pounds.
  • In the past, the Depository has stored the Declaration of Independence, the U.S. Constitution, the Articles of Confederation, Lincoln’s Gettysburg address, three volumes of the Gutenberg Bible, and Lincoln’s second inaugural address.”

(Source –> http://www.usmint.gov/about_the_mint/fun_facts/?action=fun_facts13)

–=–

One of the most interesting legends – one that is alive and well today – is that of Ron Paul. Paul wanted to spend many 100’s of millions of taxpayer dollars to audit the gold reserves of the United States, and is one of the key promoters of this “no gold in Fort Knox” myth, with absolutely no proof that this is the case.

But his real claim to fame is his Audit the Fed bill and “End The Fed” book and movement. He has become infamous for using such mythical catch-phrases as “The Federal Reserve is about as Federal as Federal Express”, and “the Federal Reserve has never been audited”. But even worse than that, his followers and fans then parrot the same thing without ever verifying the factual nature of these statements, as shown above. Again, I should know, as I used to be one of the parrots!!!

Before Paul’s current false-hope bill to supposedly “Audit The Fed”, his 2007 bill actually contradicts his own speeches where he states that the “Federal Reserve is not Federal“.

H.R. 2755 in the 110th Congress is entitled: “Federal Reserve Board Abolition Act”, and is solely sponsored by Ron Paul.

In it’s introductory text it states the following:

A BILL

To abolish the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal reserve banks, to repeal the Federal Reserve Act, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

Further into the text, it states:

SEC. 2. FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD ABOLISHED

(a) In General- Effective at the end of the 1-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and each Federal reserve bank are hereby abolished.

(b) Repeal of Federal Reserve Act- Effective at the end of the 1-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, the Federal Reserve Act is hereby repealed

(2) LIQUIDATION OF ASSETS-

(A) IN GENERAL- The Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall liquidate all assets of the Board and the Federal reserve banks in an orderly manner so as to achieve as expeditious a liquidation as may be practical while maximizing the return to the Treasury.

(B) TRANSFER TO TREASURY– After satisfying all claims against the Board and any Federal reserve bank which are accepted by the (Federal) Director of the Office of Management and Budget and redeeming the stock of such banks, the net proceeds of the liquidation under subparagraph (A) shall be transferred to the Secretary of the Treasury and deposited in the General Fund of the Treasury.

Now, there are only three options here:

Either Ron Paul knows that the Federal Reserve System, the Board, and its banks are already the property of the Treasury of the Federal Government and can be shut down and reabsorbed into that government because of that fact…

Or he had temporary insanity and contradicted his own speeches and writings…

Or he is calling for the assumption by government of a completely separate and totally private corporation that was not created by, regulated by, or owned by the federal government.

If this third option were true, would this mean that Ron Paul could write a similar bill to abolish WalMart, Monsanto, or perhaps your own personal small business to be assumed and liquidated into the Federal Treasury?

Which of these scenarios is more reasonable, logical, and for that matter provable, just by reading this bill? Do you actually think that the Federal Reserve Corporation (or any other federal agency) can exist or act legally within the United States if the Federal Reserve Act is abolished?

Where would the Fed then get its authority to operate as the United States central bank, do you think? I mean, if indeed it is a completely separate rouge entity not controlled by government, it really wouldn’t need the Federal Reserve Act or Congress’ approval in the first place, right?

Note: Anyone who answers yes to that question better go back to paragraph one…

Notice too the fact that Paul lists the “stock” of banks to be “redeemed”. The perception that this stock of the Federal Reserve Bank is owned by some international bankers is again one of those prevalent myths that just wont go away. In fact, when we go to the horses mouth (the current amended Federal Reserve Act), we can see what the stock of the Federal Reserve is and who is forced to invest in it.

Section 5 of the Federal Reserve Act (codified in U.S. CODE 12 Section 287) states:

Section 5. Stock Issues; Increase and Decrease of Capital

1. Amount of Shares; Increase and Decrease of Capital; Surrender and Cancellation of Stock

The capital stock of each Federal reserve bank shall be divided into shares of $100 each. The outstanding capital stock shall be increased from time to time as member banks increase their capital stock and surplus or as additional banks become members, and may be decreased as member banks reduce their capital stock or surplus or cease to be members. Shares of the capital stock of Federal reserve banks owned by member banks shall not be transferred or hypothecated. When a member bank increases its capital stock or surplus, it shall thereupon subscribe for an additional amount of capital stock of the Federal reserve bank of its district equal to 6 per centum of the said increase, one-half of said subscription to be paid in the manner hereinbefore provided for original subscription, and one-half subject to call of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. A bank applying for stock in a Federal reserve bank at any time after the organization thereof MUST subscribe for an amount of the capital stock of the Federal reserve bank equal to 6 per centum of the paid-up capital stock and surplus of said applicant bank, paying therefor its par value plus one-half of 1 per centum a month from the period of the last dividend. When a member bank reduces its capital stock or surplus it shall surrender a proportionate amount of its holdings in the capital stock of said Federal Reserve bank. Any member bank which holds capital stock of a Federal Reserve bank in excess of the amount required on the basis of 6 per centum of its paid-up capital stock and surplus shall surrender such excess stock. When a member bank voluntarily liquidates it shall surrender all of its holdings of the capital stock of said Federal Reserve bank and be released from its stock subscription not previously called. In any such case the shares surrendered shall be canceled and the member bank shall receive in payment therefor, under regulations to be prescribed by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, a sum equal to its cash-paid subscriptions on the shares surrendered and one-half of 1 per centum a month from the period of the last dividend, not to exceed the book value thereof, less any liability of such member bank to the Federal Reserve bank.

[12 USC 287. As amended by act of Aug. 23, 1935 (49 Stat. 713).]

(Source – The Federal Reserve Act online –>http://www.federalreserve.gov/aboutthefed/section5.htm)

–=–

Does this really sound like a bunch of bankers have control of the Federal Reserve to you? Or does it sound like banks are begging to be members of the Federal Reserve System so that they can get all of the benefits of being members of that system so as to create money via the federal reserve system? Seriously, banks can’t fractionally create money without being members of the Federal Reserve. So no usurious United States bank is going to voluntarily leave the Fed.

Does it sound like banks have a choice as to whether they want to be stock-holders to you, that is, if they want to be members and get Fed benefits?

This legend of the Federal Reserve is out of control!

Perhaps the next time you hold up a sign or plaster a bumper sticker across your automobile that reads “End The Fed”, you’ll actually think about what it is you are demanding. Are you trying to close down a private corporation, or are you trying to demand that government end its own government-owned corporation through a vote of Congress? If you believe the former, then why not hold up signs to government saying end the Monsanto or end the Walmart?

–=–

Now, you may be curious about the title of this rant, “Today’s Creatures From Jekyll Island”.

So let’s talk about who exactly these “creatures” are today and how they’ve changed since yesterday.

Again, the concept that the drafting of these words that would eventually be utilized by congress to create the Federal Reserve Act and the Federal Reserve itself through congressional committee was a rare or singular occurrence in the history of legislative actions is the biggest myth that needs to be dispelled here.

Congressmen, in fact, very seldom write their own legislation. Though the misconception is that this is the job that we vote them into office for, nothing could be farther from the truth. As you saw above, half of the time they don’t even bother to show up for voting session!

These are corporate yes-men. They are propped up into office for one reason… they have no spine. They vote as they are supposed to along party lines, without reading the bills half the time, while putting on a patriotic show every once in a while so that the “truth” movement can pass the video along to other “truthers” and make themselves feel better about exposing the truth.

So who actually drafts most of the important bills in Congress?

I’d like you to meet ALEC.

The American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) is the ultimate ultra-lobbying group, consisting of a membership roster of 100’s of major corporations and the thousands of legislators that they wine and dine before they send them back to their state or federal legislatures with ALEC-composed bills in hand. In other words, ALEC ghost-writes the bills that are put on the congress floor, just as the Federal Reserve Act was ghost-written at Jekyll Island. And the congressmen then alter and amend those bills and send them to conference just like they did in 1913.

This is not at all uncommon. In fact, it is the norm.

Hundreds of what are called ALEC Model Legislation Bills are passed each year in congress, and an unknown number are passed on the local and State level. These bills are written by corporations, amended and earmarked by congress, and signed by whichever party president, governor, or county mayor is in office at the time. It isn’t just a rumor that congress doesn’t read the bills they sign. The truth is, they don’t need to. They are just there to sign the dotted lines and enjoy the perks of their ALEC membership, add a few earmarks onto the bills, and then enjoy the benefits they’ll receive in retirement for their cooperation and for being good little minions of the shell-game.

And so, these are the creatures that both inhabit government and professionally organize outside of it, in the open, while writing the nation’s legislation without needing the privacy of an island any more.

While there are certainly other similar groups out there, ALEC is certainly the most prevalent.

Here’s a great satire on ALEC:

For more information on ALEC, visit this website:

http://www.alecexposed.org/wiki/ALEC_Exposed

Warning: As with many mainstream sites and watchdog groups out there, I urge caution and verification. While much of the information on this site is good, the Center for Media and Democracy has some troubling aspects to it… like the fact that it promotes democracy instead of a republic!

Recently, Jan Irvin interviewed one of its representatives, exposing its less public side, here:

http://www.gnosticmedia.com/brendan-fischer-interview-alec-exposed-147/

And finally, I did an interview on ALEC and private prisons with Joyce Riley on the Power Hour, one of my better interviews. Alec is one of the major supporters of and sponsor of the privatization of prisons and everything else in government. Interview here:

http://archives2012.gcnlive.com/Archives2012/jun12/PowerHour/0611122.mp3

In the end, the creatures are all around us. The only difference seems to be the blatant openness in which they operate in today’s world. They are organized into non-profit groups, for the benefit of their for-profit corporations. They are members of countless private associations (including the political parties), and they follow the rules of these associations in the legislature while our politicians lend their allegiance to the parties, not the people. Virtually nothing in government is done in the traditional way that Americans still believe it is, and still the “truther” movement seems to always look to now century old history and quotations for an explanation of what is the reality of today – which is a completely different animal in both technological prowess and the amended law books that read nothing like the rules of yesteryear.

And today, virtually all relevant statutes that are being rubber-stamped and implemented out of our local, State, and federal governments are being written by these treasonous creatures, outside of government halls, by men who no longer need to meet in secrecy on some secluded island – because treason and crime are now commonplace, publicly accepted and anticipated, and legal!

And the people do nothing but change the channel…

.

–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Saturday, September 1st, 2012

The Incontrovertible Conundrum Of Dr. Ron Paul


–=–

Note to readers… Many will turn away from the following facts before finishing this research project simply because it creates in oneself a sense of cognitive dissonance – the emotional feeling and knowing that ones beliefs are misguided, and yet believing in them anyway, no matter how undeniably overwhelming the opposing facts are to ones set of beliefs. This tool (the theory of cognitive dissonance) is paramount in the struggle to keep the people under control through advertising, entertainment, media, corporate religions, and political happenstance so that the average and even above-average person is continuously and hopelessly bound… not by facts but by belief in anti-fact. I would only ask that, as in any good scientific experiment, you consider the following well-documented evidence even if it goes against your beliefs, as one must consider all positive and negative variables in any equation before the truth can ever become clear. I promise that by the end of this article, you will have indisputable proof of corruption and subterfuge proving the Audit The Fed bill to be a fraud, and will better understand the Federal Reserve System and its actual power and authority. Consider this a challenge! And please do not do me the disservice of leaving a negative comment unless you inversely do me the service of reading this entire presentation with a truly open heart. Thank you… –Clint-

–=–

The Incontrovertible Conundrum Of Dr. Ron Paul

–=–

I want to re-visit the so-called Audit The Fed bill sponsored by Ron Paul, with versions in both the house and the senate this year, as well as the indelible Ron Paul phenomenon itself. To do this, we must delve deep into the language of both the house bill and the US CODE for which that bill will effect, as well as attempting to dispel some fallacies about the Federal Reserve System and its perceived power structure. If you support Ron Paul, you owe it to yourself and your fellow well-intentioned compatriots to read this entire presentation – no matter how badly it stings – and to make sure that others like yourself receive this information. Misinformation abounds, and faith alone in our perceptions is a poisonous and even deadly weakness. For blind faith is destroying our people. Consider the following collection of information a public service designed to break our collective spell of inaction due to our misguided faith in party-politics and false-change/hope. Hope is the great in-activator; powerful enough to stop millions of gun owners from acting upon the very reason of treason that they claim for this right to bear arms.

Study materials for this adventure can be found at the following links:

US CODE> TITLE 31> SECTION 14 – http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/31/714

Full text of HR459 – http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/hr459/text

–=–

Dear Patriots

–=–

Firstly, in a recent letter/email to his constituents, Ron Paul had the following to say:

After nearly 30 years of fighting for liberty in Washington, my time in Congress is rapidly coming to an end.  But what a way to go out!  I am so pleased to tell you about what could be the crowning achievement of my legislative efforts – passing our Audit the Fed bill!

I know a lot has been asked of you this year, but I’m writing today to make sure you understand that in the coming days, my biggest priority will be passing my Audit the Fed bill through Congress.

The good news is, the House leadership has promised a vote on Audit the Fed this July, so I must ask EVERY SINGLE PATRIOT to help Campaign for Liberty in this vital effort today.

You can help me make history – and help change the course of the country – by passing Audit the Fed through Congress.

–=–

Let’s break this down, so that we can better understand this typical “Campaign For Liberty” hope-propaganda as it pertains to these Federal Reserve Transparency bills being promoted here.

Dr. Paul states that he has been “fighting for liberty in Washington” for nearly 30 years, and that the “crowning achievement” to his political career will be the passing of the “Audit The Fed bill”.

It is important to note that for the 12 terms that Ron Paul has been in Congress, this man has achieved the almost unheard of feat of passing not one national bill/law as a sponsor in these 24 years of “fighting for liberty in Washington“. In other words, for the last 24 years, Ron Paul has been nothing but talk! He has placated the very people who would otherwise be carrying pitchforks and guns to their legislator’s offices by giving them exactly what they needed: hope. Ron Paul has served as the great white hope of patriots everywhere. And this ability to control the heartbeat of the resistance with nothing but broken promises along side complete inaction with empty words and catch-phrases has created a whole generation of deer in headlights – while the most dire of tyranny and injustice is taking place in full sight of Paul’s hopeful and faithful supporters.

Well… To be fair, one of Paul’s congressional bills did pass. It was entitled:

A Bill:

“To authorize the Administrator of General Services to convey a parcel of real property in Galveston, Texas, to the Galveston Historical Foundation.”

(Source: http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/111/hr2121)

The Washington Post described the passing of this bill like this:

The passage of H.R. 2121 (above), in fall 2009, unfolded without drama. It allowed for the sale of a customhouse in Galveston, Tex. The House debate took two minutes, and the vote took eight seconds. The ayes had it.

But something historic was happening. On his 482nd try, Rep. Ron Paul (R-Tex.) had authored a bill that would become law.

Paul has become a surprising force in the Republican presidential race, promising to use “the bully pulpit of the presidency” to demand deep cutbacks across government. But Paul has had only limited success using his current pulpit — a seat in Congress — to rally lawmakers behind his ideas.

Of the 620 measures that Paul has sponsored, just four have made it to a vote on the House floor. Only that one has been signed into law.

(Source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/ron-pauls-house-record-stands-out-for-its-futility-and-tenacity/2011/12/23/gIQA5ioVJP_story.html)

So Ron Paul’s ONE success story as a Congressman is that he got some federal land conveyed to a historical society in his home district of Galvesten, Texas, at fair market value. Holy hand grenade Batman… that’s liberty in Washington alright!

In other words, besides subduing the masses of otherwise hopeless people with inspirational and patriotic speaches, Ron Paul’s “crowning achievement” will literally be his only tangible or physical achievement with regards to his national congressional political career in Washington. To break it down even further… if actions do indeed speak louder than words, then Ron Paul is the deaf-mute of congress!

–=–

The Old Bait And Switch:

Ron Paul’s Addiction To Earmarks

–=–

But it is not enough to stop there… For Congressman Paul has a wonderfully deceitful and unethical trick that he uses to benefit his congressional district in Texas – from within the very bills that he publicly admonishes and votes against:

“U.S. Rep. Ron was one of only four House Republicans to break rank from the party and request earmarks despite a Republican Conference earmark moratorium. Paul sent 41 earmark requests totaling $157,093,544 for the 2011 Fiscal Year. His largest single request was $19,500,000 for a naval training ship at the Texas Maritime Academy in Galveston, followed by $18,126,000 to provide maintenance on the Matagorda Ship Channel.”

“For Fiscal Year 2010, Paul requested 54 total earmarks, adding up to $398,460,640 in pork that the former presidential candidate sought to bring home to his district. These requests were made prior to the House Republican Conference’s voluntary ban on filing earmarks.

“Paul’s largest request in 2010 was $51.5 million in federal money to be spent on “Reconstruction of Bluewater Highway Hurricane Evacuation Route Between Brazoria and Galveston Counties in Texas.” He requested another $50 million to be directed to the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and $46 million for deepening the Texas City channel. The majority of Paul’s requests were for projects related to various ports and channels, though other sectors of his district also received attention, such as $20 million for a hospital in Chambers County. Even smaller projects received attention from the libertarian representative, such as $2.5 million requested “to redevelop historic downtown area and to purchase trash cans, bike racks and decorative street lighting” in Baytown.

While Paul requested these earmarks, he can still claim to have voted against the spending. Here’s how he defended his earmarking habit when he was challenged during a Fox News interview in 2009:

‘I think you’re missing the whole point. I have never voted for an earmark. I voted against all appropriation bills. So, this whole thing about earmarks is totally misunderstood.’

‘Earmarks is the responsibility of the Congress. We should earmark even more. We should earmark every penny. So, that’s the principle that we have to follow and the — and the responsibility of the Congress. The whole idea that you vote against an earmark, you don’t save a penny. That just goes to the administration and they get to allocate the funds.’

(Author’s note: That’s national [Federal] taxpayer money we are talking about here. This earmark appropriation comes out of your pocket eventually. That means you in California, Arizona, Pennsylvania, and Michigan. You too, Guam! You all pay for improvements and funding for Galveston, Texas. And in general, earmarks have absolutely nothing to do with the bills being passed.)

Continued…

Of the five U.S. House members who brought home more total earmarked money than Paul, three were defeated in the November elections — Democratic U.S. Reps. Chet Edwards, Solomon Ortiz and Ciro Rodriguez  (who all have large military installations in or near their districts.)

(Source: http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/did-you-know-that-ron-paul-unethically-loads-up-bills-with-earmarks-for-his-own-district-then-votes/question-2087147/)

“Mother Jones” also reported the following:

“Even as the 12-term congressman has become the Cassandra of governmental overreach, he has enabled a deepening dependence on the federal government at home. Paul, who last week announced that he will retire at the end of 2012, will on one hand be remembered as “Dr. No,” the politician who always voted “nay” on new spending, and on the other, as “a politician like all the rest,” as Galveston GOP precinct chair Josh Daniels described him to me last week, noting that Paul’s Janus-faced approach to federal spending “just doesn’t sit well with me”.

For better or worse, Paul has always cauterized his anti-government views with old-fashioned cronyism. Knowing that most appropriations bills will pass despite his nay vote, he often loads them with earmarks. In this way, he has managed to please both small-government conservatives and pork-loving constituents.”

(Source: http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2011/07/ron-paul-texas-federal-spending-pork)

I can virtually hear the various excuses and attempts at justification for Dr. Paul’s actions mixed with the familiar ring of cognitive dissonance even as I write this. But the simple truth is that this habitual addiction to voting no on the majority of congressional bills in order to attain and maintain a good voting record that will appease your supporters, while adding and benefiting from your own earmarks placed into those very same bills, while keeping up the appearance that your public voting record against bad legislation is pure…

In this author’s opinion, this is the ultimate in deceit and manipulation.

–=–

Liberty In Washington

Huh?

–=–

It is also important to say here that “fighting for liberty in Washington” is not the same as fighting for liberty in Texas (or America). In fact it is quite safe to say that Ron Paul has made his Texas district more dependent on Federal Government handouts and earmarks than most other congressmen – and that in the end equates to anti-liberty.

Remember, Washington D.C. is a district; not a state. It is a corporation acting as a government. It is not part of the land of America – not one of the 50 states united – and it can not and will not ever have liberty. A corporation is by definition not free and will never be liberated – unless it is unincorporated.

Ron Paul is nothing more than one of millions of employees of that corporation, keeping the Holy Grail secret of the audited Federal Reserve Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) safe from the people’s collective knowledge, right in line with the rest.

The men and women of congress (Senate and the House) are not free and independent, altruistic representatives of the people as we are continuously led to believe, but are actually TITLE 2 & TITLE 5 “employees” of the Federal Government. They get hired as employees after being voted in by voting machines (Diebold is just another government stock investment held corporation).

Let’s look at what the Federal law itself states about this:

USC – TITLE 5 – GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATION AND EMPLOYEES

TITLE 5 > PART III > Subpart F > CHAPTER 73 > SUBCHAPTER IV > § 7342

§ 7342. Receipt and disposition of foreign gifts and decorations

(a) For the purpose of this section—

(1) “employee” means—

(E) the President and the Vice President;

(F) a Member of Congress as defined by section 2106 of this title (except the Vice President) and any Delegate to the Congress; and

(G) the spouse of an individual described in subparagraphs (A) through (F) -or a dependent

(2) “foreign government” means—

(A) any unit of foreign governmental authority, including any foreign national, State, local, and municipal government;

(that’s you, America! The United States is a foreign corporation!!!)

(6) “employing agency” (employer) means—

(A) the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct of the House of Representatives, for Members and employees of the House of Representatives, except that those responsibilities specified in subsections (note that a “Member” is a “congressman”, including Ron Paul!)

(B) the Select Committee on Ethics of the Senate, for Senators and employees of the Senate, except that those responsibilities

(C) the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, for judges and judicial branch employees; (all judges) and

(D) the department, agency, office, or other entity in which an employee is employed, for other legislative branch employees and for all executive branch employees (and that includes the President, who is an “employee”).

TITLE 5 § 2105 – Employee

(a) For the purpose of this title, “employee”, except as otherwise provided by this section or when specifically modified, means an officer and an individual who is—

(1) appointed in the civil service by one of the following acting in an official capacity—

(A) the President;

(B) a Member or Members of Congress, or the Congress;

(C) a member of a uniformed service;

(D) an individual who is an employee under this section;

(E) the head of a Government controlled corporation

TITLE 5 › Part III › Subpart A › Chapter 21 › § 2106

§ 2106 – MEMBER OF CONGRESS

For the purpose of this title, “Member of Congress” means the Vice President, a member of the Senate or the House of Representatives, a Delegate to the House of Representatives, and the Resident Commissioner from Puerto Rico.

Also read – TITLE 2: THE CONGRESS (Link: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/2)

So how is Congress listed when we search for it as a corporation?

From Manta.com:

Congress, United States

Congress
H 232 Capitol Building
Washington, DC20515-0001

About Congress, United States

Phone: (202) 225-0100

Business Categories:

Executive Offices, National in Washington, DC
Executive Office
Executive Offices

Congress, United States in Washington, DC is a private company categorized under Executive Offices, National. Our records show it was established in and incorporated in District of Columbia.

Products or Services: Federal Government Services, Government Relocation.

Congress, United States also does business as Congress .

–==–

What about Ron Paul himself. Surely he is a real person, right?

Manta.com states:

Representative Ron Paul

Congress, United States
122 W Way Street # 301
Lake Jackson, TX77566-5245

About Representative Ron Paul

Phone: (979) 285-0231 

Business Categories
 
Executive Office
Legislative Bodies

Representative Ron Paul in Lake Jackson, TX is a private company categorized under Federal Government-Executive Offices. Our records show it was established in and incorporated in Texas.

Representative Ron Paul also does business as Congress, United States.

–=–

Congressional Districts?

–=–

What is a congressional district?

It is a Federal District, of course. Congress is part of the main headquartered-in-Washington D.C. United States corporation, and congressmen are employees of the US Federal Government.

Where do Washington D.C’s federal “Capital Police” have jurisdiction and authority?

Only on “US corporation” land: i.e. Washington D.C. – but not anywhere in the individual 50 states united:

What do they do?

Protect the corporation, it’s land, and its “employees”.

(Link: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/2/1967)

–=–

Has The Federal Reserve Ever Been Audited?

–=–

Perhaps the greatest deceit- be it purposeful or accidental- that Ron Paul and his Campaign For Liberty have imposed upon their followers is the promotion of the Federal Reserve as a separate and out of control independent entity that is somehow outside of the U.S. Government’s legal jurisdiction, and that it is not required to audit it’s financial statements…

Let’s dispel this propaganda right here and now!

Please, please read the following history of the audits of the Federal Reserve, reprinted here:

–=–

A Brief History of Federal Reserve Audits

Since its inception in 1913 the Federal Reserve System has been subjected to a variety of financial and performance audits by Congress, the executive branch, and private accounting firms, although responsibility for this task has shifted from time to time. From 1913 to 1921 the Board of Governors, then known as the Federal Reserve Board which sets monetary policy and regulates the activities of the Federal Reserve Banks, was audited annually by the U.S. Treasury Department. In 1921 Congress created the Government Accounting Office (GAO) and assigned it to audit the Board until 1933. In the Banking Act of 1933, Congress voted specifically to remove the Board from the GAO’s jurisdiction. From 1933 to 1952 audit teams from the twelve Federal Reserve Banks performed the annual examination of the BOG’s books. From 1952 to 1978, the Board, under authorization from Congress, decided to employ nationally recognized accounting firms to conduct the audits of itself to insure independent oversight.  This provided an external evaluation of the adequacy and effectiveness of the examination procedures.

In 1978 Congress passed the Federal Banking Agency Audit Act (31 USCA §714). It placed the Federal Reserve System back under the auditing authority of the GAO. The Act significantly increased the access of the GAO to the Federal Reserve Banks, the Board, and the Federal Open Market Committee (the FOMC). Since then, the GAO has conducted over 100 financial audits and performance audits of the three Federal Reserve bodies.

Scope of GAO Audits

Some of the more important GAO performance audits of the Fed have been in the areas of bank supervision, payment systems activities, and government securities activities. In the first area, the GAO examined how well the Fed was enforcing its regulatory powers over its member banks. In 1992 it drew attention to the Fed’s sluggish compliance with regulatory reforms mandated by the Foreign Bank Supervision Act of 1991. In examining the Fed’s payment system activities, the GAO made the Fed aware of how its pricing policies for such services as check-clearing affected private suppliers of check-clearing services, and also suggested ways to speed up the process of check collections. Security markets for government debt is a crucial market, and GAO performance audits of the Fed have lead to more openness in the primary dealer system, particularly concerning the disclosure of price information. The GAO is also involved in several ongoing performance audits of the Fed such as analysis of risks and benefits of interstate banking, regulation of derivatives, and the budget of the Federal Reserve system.

Audits By Private Accounting Firms

Financial audits of the Fed are also conducted regularly. Each Reserve Bank is audited every year by independent General Auditors who report directly to the Board of Governors.  These examinations involve financial statement audits and reviews on the effectiveness of financial controls.  Each Reserve Bank also has its own internal audit mechanisms.  The Board contracts each year with an outside accounting firm to evaluate the audit program’s effectiveness.  Price Waterhouse conducted an audit of the Board’s 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, and 1998 financial statements…

The Board has also contracted with Coopers & Lybrand to conduct annual financial audits of the Board and the individual Federal Reserve Banks.

Exemptions to the Scope of GAO Audits

The Government Accounting Office does not have complete access to all aspects of the Federal Reserve System.  The law excludes the following areas from GAO inspections (31 USCA §714):

(1) transactions for or with a foreign central bank, government of a foreign country, or nonprivate international financing organization;

(2) deliberations, decisions, or actions on monetary policy matters, including discount window operations, reserves of member banks, securities credit, interest on deposits, open market operations;

(3) transactions made under the direction of the Federal Open Market Committee; or

(4) a part of a discussion or communication among or between members of the Board of Governors and officers and employees of the Federal Reserve System related to items.

(Author’s note to readers: Please understand that Congress passed this restrictive act in the first place [Title 31, Section 714 – the subject of the entirety of the “Audit The Fed” bill], which limited the audit ability of the Comptroller General as it is reported to Congress. But the average person reading this most likely thinks that the Federal Reserve is a rogue agency that refuses to allow its transactions listed above to be audited. The Ron Paul campaign and Audit The Fed bill only serves to change a rule that Congress – not the Federal Reserve or the Comptroller General – already voted into law in 1978 – called the Federal Banking Agency Audit Act (TITLE 31, Section 714). The Fed has nothing to do with this fact and has no authority whatsoever to change or deny this law. In other words, it is Congress itself [the government corporation] that is currently keeping this information off of the Comptroller General’s audit to the Congress, and thus out of the realm of public or legislative disclosure. Understand this, and you understand controlled opposition politics.)

Continued…

In 1993 Wayne D. Angell, then a member of the Board of Governors, submitted testimony before a House subcommittee on the reasons for the restrictions on GAO access.  He commented,

By excluding these areas, the (congressional) Act (TITLE 31, Section 714) attempts to balance the need for public accountability of the Federal Reserve through GAO audits against the need to insulate the central bank’s monetary policy functions from short-term political pressures and to ensure that foreign central banks and governmental entities can transact business in the U.S. financial markets through the Federal Reserve on a confidential basis.

In reference to a bill that would lift the constraints placed on the GAO’s audit authority over the Federal Reserve, Angell stated:

The benefits, if any, of broadening the GAO’s authority into the areas of monetary policy and transactions with foreign official entities would be small.  With regard to purely financial audits, the Federal Reserve Act already requires that the Board conduct an annual financial examination of each Reserve Bank (CAFR)The process of conducting financial audits is reviewed by a public accounting firm to confirm that the methods and techniques being employed are effective and that the program follows generally accepted auditing standards… Further, a private accounting firm audits the Board’s balance sheet… Finally, and more broadly, the Congress has, in effect, mandated its own review of monetary policy by requiring semiannual reports to Congress on monetary policy under the Full Employment and Balanced Growth Act of 1978… In addition, there is a vast and continuously updated body of literature and expert evaluation of U.S. monetary policy.  In this environment, the contribution that a GAO audit would make to the active public discussion of the conduct of monetary policy is not likely to outweigh the disadvantages of expanding GAO audit authority in this area.

For more on GAO restrictions, you can search the Government Printing Office website for GAO report T-GGD-94-44, entitled “Federal Reserve System Audits: Restrictions on GAO’s Access.”

The Budget of the Federal Reserve and Other Oversight

The budget of the Federal Reserve system is determined by each Bank and the Board of Governors. Stephen L. Neal, the Chair of the House Subcommittee on Domestic Monetary Policy in 1991, stated that “Congress plays no direct role in setting or authorizing the Fed’s budget.

“Control of its own budget is an essential component of the independence the Fed must enjoy.” Additional oversight of the Federal Reserve System derives from the ability of Congress to expand or to contract the Fed’s powers. On numerous occasions Congress has seen fit to change the Fed’s structure, alter its mission, and grant it new or different powers. In 1935 Congress changed the composition of the Board of Governors to give it more independence, and it allowed the Board to determine the discount rate for all Federal Reserve Banks rather than allow each Bank to set its own rate. In 1978 Congress mandated the Fed’s new goal to be full employment and price stability. In 1980 Congress granted the Fed new regulatory powers over non-member banks. Many other government reports on the audits of the Federal Reserve system are available on-line through the Government Printing Office website…

 (Source: http://www.publiceye.org/conspire/flaherty/flaherty6.html) Reprinted above.

–End Excerpt–

–=–

Do you still believe that the Federal Reserve operates completely outside of government control?

Do you actually think that the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve and all who work for it are not employees of Federal government?

Really?

–=–

Will Ron Paul’s Audit The Fed Bill
“Change The Course Of The Country”
As Ron Paul Insists?

–=–

The short answer is a resounding NO!

Is it a start; a push in the right direction?

NO!!!

Will Ron Paul’s “Federal Reserve Transparency” bill accomplish anything new with regards to the House and Senate’s ability to utilize the already existing audits (CAFR) of the Federal Reserve for their employment purposes and use in their budgetary requirements and planning as a collective group of employees of the United States Government in the legislative process?

NO, NO, NO!!!

Will this bill make the Fed in any way more transparent to the Congress?

NO! QUITE THE OPPOSITE, ACTUALLY.

Will Congress use any new information (which there will be none) to End The Fed?

NOPE. THEY CREATED THE FED AND ITS SECRECY IN THE FIRST PLACE!!! THOUGH THEY MIGHT REPLACE OR MERGE IT INTO THE WORLD BANK STRUCTURE SOON.

Let me explain…

At any time they see fit, the House and the Senate may go to the Federal Reserve’s public website, just as you yourself can, and pull up the audit of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors and of the individual banks themselves. This full audit, which follows the government’s own generally accepted accounting standards and practices and of which is absolutely required of all government entities by Federal Law, is called the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR), listed here as the “Annual Report” of the Fed…

LINK TO FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD AUDIT REPORTS SINCE 1995: 
http://www.federalreserve.gov/publications/annual-report/default.htm

LINK TO INDIVIDUAL FEDERAL RESERVE BANK AUDIT REPORTS FOR 2011: http://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/bst_fedfinancials.htm

So here it is – the over 500 page report of audited information in one comprehensive report that hardly anyone actually reads, including Congress. Most people don’t even know it exists – even for their own local and state governments. Instead, most people choose to read a published for-profit/non-fiction book full of loosely truthful and often plagiarized and rehashed historical information about the inception of the Federal Reserve Banks, and then continue to publicly vilify a bunch of incestuous bankers… who are no longer even in the realm of the living. Most are familiar with the fact that this central bank was created by the Federal Reserve Act (by Congress itself), but most have never bothered to actually read that Act! And so, most do not know that this central banking law has been ammended and changed every year by Congress to the point that this bank is a completely different animal than it was at its creation. This Act is not permenent in any way, and can be changed (for good or bad) or abolished at any time Congress sees fit. This fact may be a shock to many people.

The Federal Reserve Act can be found here, on the Federal Reserve Website, as well as in the U.S. CODE…

Link: http://www.federalreserve.gov/aboutthefed/fract.htm

Note that the updated/amended Section 2B of the Federal Reserve Act states the following:

Section 2B. Appearances Before and Reports to the Congress…

(c) Public access to information. The Board shall place on its home Internet website, a link entitled `Audit’, which shall link to a webpage that shall serve as a repository of information made available to the public for a reasonable period of time, not less than 6 months following the date of release of the relevant information, including–

1. the reports prepared by the Comptroller General under section 714 of title 31, United States Code;

2. the annual financial statements (CAFR) prepared by an independent auditor for the Board in accordance with section 11B;

3. the reports to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate required under section 13(3) (relating to emergency lending authority); and

4. such other information as the Board reasonably believes is necessary or helpful to the public in understanding the accounting, financial reporting, and internal controls of the Board and the Federal reserve banks.

[12 USC 225b. As added by act of July 21, 2010 (124 Stat. 2118).]

And Section 11B of the amended Federal Reserve Act  in U.S. CODE states the following:

Section 11B. Annual Independent Audits of Federal Reserve Banks and Board

The Board shall order an annual independent audit of the financial statements of each Federal reserve bank and the Board.

[12 USC 248b. As added by act of Nov. 12, 1999 (113 Stat. 1475).]

Now, for those of you who support without reservation or in depth examination the notion that Ron Paul’s Audit The Fed Bill will actually “help me (Ron Paul) make history – and help change the course of the country – by passing Audit the Fed through Congress”, well then I have a bridge in Brooklyn I’d like to sell you!

Notice that the above “independent audits” and “annual financial statements” clauses were recently changed by Acts of Congress which amended the portion of U.S. CODE called the “Federal Reserve Act”. This of course means that the Congress has the power to require anything it wishes with regards to its requirements of an audit of any governmental department, via the utilization of its legislative powers and creation of law (bills and acts) – the ones that control the operations of the Federal Reserve Board and banks. Congress created the Federal Reserve Act. Congress amended this section which calls for an audit. And so at any time, the congress can require an unrestricted audit with the simple pushing of a few vote buttons and the signing of a pen, without any obfuscation or problem from or by the Federal Reserve system or its Board – or even the president of the United States. And this includes the so-called Audit the Fed bill that has pulled most of us into its all but worthless verbiage – a bill that would do absolutely nothing to create a new audit of the Federal Reserve, and which does not do one thing to acknowledge or change the reporting structure of the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) – the actual “independently audited” financial statements of the Federal Reserve system available to the public (and to the congress).

This complete yet hidden power of Congress over the Fed through legislation is yet another aspect of the legend of the Federal Reserve Bank: the Fed has become a virtually impenetrable wall of fallacious conspiracy rhetoric that is almost impossible to overcome without study of the actual laws and information that bind the Federal Reserve System. And so the attention of the people has been drawn to the tool of government (the Fed) instead of to the controlling body of that tool (the Congress).

In fact, the subject of these Audit The Fed bills is TITLE 31, Section 714 of U.S. CODE. Ironically, congress created this section in 1978.

The perceived concept that the Federal Reserve is somehow completely separate from and totally outside of the authority or binding laws of its creator (congress) is perhaps the most egregious yet seemingly purposeful error that Ron Paul and his supporters parrot as the absolute truth.

Now, let’s examine this fallacy with some cold hard facts…

The Federal Reserve is what is called an “Independent Agency Of The United States Federal Government“.

LINK: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Independent_agencies_of_the_United_States_government
(Note: Yes, this is a Wikipedia site – but is very well sourced. Please utilize these sources!)

I must admit here that I believed at one time that this meant exactly what it sounds like – that the Federal Reserve is separate from and not under control of the government itself and of its congress (employees). But let’s examine what this title of “independent agency” actually means…

An Independent Agency of the government is a government agency that exists outside of the operational authorities of the Federal Executive Departments, which are those departments that are headed by the President’s Cabinet Secretaries or by the Presidential post itself via Executive Orders and Presidential Directives. These independent agencies are absolutely “constitutional”, as they are created by the “elected” officials of congress to be a part of your government. They are referred to as independent agencies strictly in the sense that, because they are created by congress, they are agencies under control of the legislative branch of government, not the executive branch. Therefore, the president has none to little power over these agencies except that which is granted by congress to the president. In this way, as a check and balance, the executive branch cannot control an agency created by the legislative branch. Thus, the agency’s operation is independent of total presidential control – but not of congressional control (via amendments to legislation or the un-incorporation (dissembling) of one of these “agencies” via congressional legislative statute). It is traditional for congress to appoint in its enabling acts for these independent agencies (as a courtesy between branches) the power of appointment of the heads of these agencies to the president of the United States (executive branch), and these appointments must generally be approved by congress after presidential appointment. But the president does not generally have the sole authority or power to un-appoint (fire) the head of that agency (employee), as this is not a power that is delegated by congress to the president. But just because the president’s power to dismiss an agency’s head or one of its members is limited by Congress, this does not give complete autonomous authority to that head or member of that independent agency. Such authority is delegated via a statutory grant as written in U.S. CODE (in other words, the president can request from congress that the agency head be fired and replaced, but cannot do it himself – which again does not mean that the head or chairman cannot be fired by government or is somehow above the law).

As well, the delegated authority of rule-making is also delegated by the congress. This privilege has been confused as the “independent” ability to make law. This is not the case. Again, the power to create independent rules from within the bounds of an independent agency does not equal complete autonomy from government or from the U.S. CODE (laws/statutes) that bind them.

To put this into perspective, my father certainly made his own seemingly (at the time) tyrannical rules for his house, and we the family (dependents/employees) had to obey those rules or face his personal wrath. But this in no way gave my father or the rest of my family the right to act in any way outside of the actual law. We the people of the family still were bound by the law, despite my fathers ability to make independent rules. Rules and laws are not the same thing, and the independent creation of rules within the Federal Reserve System is not the same as the creation of laws by congress that regulate the Federal Reserve. Laws will always trump rules without exception. The real problem is when the laws created by congress allow these independent agencies to create rules that allow what would otherwise be considered crime or treason!

Even the Senate and the House create their own set of independent rules within their halls. They call these the “Rules of Ethics”, and these rules are decided and overseen through a committee of House and Senate members for which they call the individual “Ethics Committees” (i.e. “The Senate Select Committee On Ethics”). But these rules and the rule making authority are separate from and beneath the US CODE “law” that Congress as a whole creates. And these ethics rules, similar to any other private corporation, are the rules of conduct while the members (employees) are at the workplace (halls of congress). Again, this does not in any way represent a separation of authority or an independence or exemption with regards to being a government agency controlled by acts of congress. Independent agency rules, however, do have the power of federal law, and they are overseen by these so-called ethics committees and referred to judicial review if these rules have been broken. The inherent problem here is that the Senate and House create ethics and decide what is ethical, and then oversee the committee that decides whether their own ethics rules have been violated. This could be compared to honor among thieves, where a group of thieves go underground and create a guild (committee) to decide upon what is honorable and punishable among their fellow crooks. Of course, thieves work together, and so exposing one thief for breaking the guild’s ethics and turning him over to the law through judicial review would likely expose the entire den of thieves for the same or similar crimes! And so the case of ethics or rules violations almost never gets out of these ethics committees – which are held by the fellow thieves (congressmen) and no outside, public, or unbiased juries. Therefore, laws that are broken can be covered up by ethics committee’s, since no internal rules were broken, and because the case never leaves committee (of fellow thieves) and enters the judicial review process. (More on these inadequate and corrupt “ethics committee’s” in a future video presentation.)

To hit this home even further to those whose faith in the independence fallacy just won’t be shaken or shattered, I’d like to compare the Federal Reserve agency to some other independent agencies of government.

1a) The Federal Reserve System is an independent agency of government.

1b) The United States Postal Service is an independent agency of government.

1c) The Social Security System is an independent agency of government.

2a) The Federal Reserve System is a government corporation created by an Act of Congress.

2b) The U.S. Postal Service is a government corporation created by an Act of Congress(The Postal Clause in Article 1 of the United States Constitution empowered congress “To establish post offices and post roads” and in 1791, the executive department called the Post Office Department was created by congress. Finally, taking effect July 1, 1971, the “Postal Reorganization Act” was created by congress and signed by President Richard Nixon on August 12, 1970, replacing the cabinet-level (providentially controlled) Post Office Department with the new independent “United States Postal Service” corporation.)

2c) The Social Security System is a government corporation created by an Act of Congress. (The Social Security Act was established in congress and signed by the president on August 14, 1935. This Act created a Social Security Board (SSB) to oversee the administration of the new program. After several revisions, President Clinton signed {42 U.S.C. Section 901} 42 U.S.C. § 901 making the Social Security Administration (SSA) an independent agency of the executive branch of government. Its commissioner, Michael J. Astrue, was appointed by the president and sworn in on February 12, 2007 for a six-year term. As of that year, about 62,000 people were employed by the SSA corporation.)

3a) The U.S. Federal Reserve System has an independent board appointed by the president.

3b) The U.S. Postal Service has an independent board of governors appointed by the president. (As the governing body of the Postal Service, the 11-member Board of Governors [of the U.S. Postal Service] has responsibilities comparable to the board of directors of a publicly held corporation. The Board is made up of nine Governors appointed by the President of the United States with the advice and consent of the Senate. No more than five Governors can be members of the same political party. The Board currently has two seats vacant. The other two members of the Board are the Postmaster General and the Deputy Postmaster General. The Governors appoint the Postmaster General, who serves at their pleasure without a specific term of office. The Governors, together with the Postmaster General, appoint the Deputy Postmaster General.) (Link: http://about.usps.com/publications/annual-report-comprehensive-statement-2011/html/ar2011_report_8.htm)

3c) The U.S. Social Security System has an independent board appointed by the president. (The Social Security Act created a Social Security Board (SSB). The Board consisted of three presidentially appointed executives. In 1939, the Social Security Board merged into the Executive Cabinet-level Federal Security Agency, which included the SSB, the U.S. Public Health Service, the Civilian Conservation Corps, and other agencies. In 1946, the SSB was renamed the Social Security Administration under President Truman’s “Reorganization Plan”. In 1953, the Federal Security Agency was abolished and the SSA was placed under the  Department of Health, Education, and Welfare (HEW), which became the Department of Health and Human Services in 1980. In 1994, President Bill Clinton signed into law 42 U.S.C. § 901returning the SSA to the status of an independent agency in the executive branch of government. “The Social Security Advisory Board (SSAB) is an independent, bipartisan board created by Congress and appointed by the President and the Congress to advise the President, the Congress, and the Commissioner of Social Security on matters related to the Social Security and Supplemental Security Income programs.” (Link: http://www.ssab.gov/)

4a) The U.S. Federal Reserve System is bound by U.S. CODE (TITLE 12).

4b) The U.S. Postal Service is bound by U.S. CODE (TITLE 18, 39).

4c) The U.S. Social Security System is bound by U.S. CODE (TITLE 42).

5a) The U.S. Federal Reserve System can be abolished (uncreated) by congress at any time.

5b) The U.S. Postal Service can be abolished (uncreated) by congress at any time.

5c) The U.S. Social Security System can be abolished (uncreated) by congress at any time.

6a) The U.S. Federal Reserve System is audited and publishes a CAFR every year.

(Link–> http://www.federalreserve.gov/publications/annual-report/default.htm)

6b) The U.S. Postal Service is audited and publishes a CAFR every year.

(Link–> http://about.usps.com/who-we-are/financials/annual-reports/fy2010/welcome.htm)

6c) The U.S. Social Security System is audited and publishes a CAFR every year.

(LINK–> http://www.ssa.gov/OACT/TR/2011/)

Other examples of independent agencies of government include:

Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)
Federal Election Commission (FEC)
Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
Federal Maritime Commission (FMC)
Federal Trade Commission (FTC)
National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)
National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB)
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
United States International Trade Commission (USITC)
Postal Regulatory Commission
Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)
National Credit Union Administration
Consumer Product Safety Commission

Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection
, formally part of the Federal Reserve Board
Surface Transportation Board, within the Department of Transportation.
United States Maritime Administration, within the Department of Transportation.

–=–

So why isn’t everyone in the Campaign For Liberty and the End The Fed movement trying to audit the already audited U.S. Postal Service? Why isn’t there an End The Post Office campaign? Why aren’t they concerned that an “independent agency of government” is handling everyone in the United States’ mail? Why isn’t the Post Office considered a grand conspiracy by a bunch of post-masters and men with a mail-fetish who make their own rules (not laws) and operate somewhat outside of executive (but not congressional) government control with a board of governors who cannot be fired by the president of the United States alone? And with the known corruption within the U.S. Postal Service, why the blatant lack of interest in this equally independent agency of government?

Why indeed… Probably because when put into this context, an Audit the U.S. Postal Service/Campaign For Liberty/End the Postal Service campaign sounds absolutely absurd, and it certainly wouldn’t win any elections or deliver millions into the campaign coffers.

But the evil banker angle… placing the blame on dead bankers and on everything but the actual laws that make everything the Federal Reserve does absolutely legal while completely diverting everyone’s attention away from these laws and the published yearly CAFR audits while stating that this already audited institution needs to be audited, and never correcting the people who state emphatically that the evil Fed has indeed never been audited… now that wins votes – and donations. It even wins your completely unqualified son a place on the U.S. Senate, complete with a mufti-million dollar tax-exempt expense account and a too good to be true life-long pension – nepotism at its finest. It might even get him a vice-presidential appointment… as long as he publicly supports his fellow Republican, Mitt Romney.

Folks, the problem here isn’t these independent agencies of government. The problem is GOVERNMENT itself! The central core incorporation of government is the controlling entity responsible for the laws that regulate these “independent” agencies. To blame the Fed for all of our problems is like blaming one individual thorn of a rose bush with multiple-dozens of thorns for the actions of, the growing of, the aroma of, and even the beauty of the entire rosebush. The thorn cannot exist without the entire Rose bush supporting its very prickliness.

But I digress… for we haven’t even taken a look at what the now infamous “Audit The Fed” bill will actually accomplish…

NOTHING!

-=-

What Will The Audit The Fed Bill Accomplish?

-=-

You’ve already read above what Wayne D. Angell stated in front of the congressional sub-committee on this subject in 1993. But perhaps you want to hear it from someone a bit more impartial than a former Federal Reserve Board member… someone like myself. So let’s examine this bill together, and break down exactly what this Federal Reserve Transparency bill will accomplish if it is passed – by actually reading the bill and which part of the U.S. CODE it will effect.

The following is the full text as taken from H.R. 459. I will comment after each short section in (red) below.

-=-

112th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. R. 459

To require a full audit of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal reserve banks by the Comptroller General of the United States before the end of 2012, and for other purposes.

A BILL

To require a full audit of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal reserve banks by the Comptroller General of the United States before the end of 2012, and for other purposes.

(Already we see a very misleading statement. The Board of Governors is already required to submit a Comprehensive Annual Financial Report [CAFR] which is audited independently from the board and is required by federal law to be available to the public [and therefore congress]. This bill says nothing about the CAFR, as you will see. And unfortunately, Ron Paul will not talk about or disclose the CAFR  audit in his inspirational speeches, within the halls of congress, or within this bill. I can’t stress this enough… the already existing audit will not be changed, as it is considered the full financial audit of the Fed Board and the individual banks. The problem that stands out the most here is that the word “full” is not defined for the purposes of this bill and the audit it requires. The word full though, is certainly defined as the “audited financial statements” of government – the CAFR. Without a specific explanation of what this word “full” means in legalese, already this bill is absolutely worthless. The “full” audit already exists as pertaining to the definitions given by the Government Accounting Standards Board [GASB] the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board [FASAB] and Generally Accepted Accounting Procedures [GAAP]. Again, nothing in this bill defines the word full, or refers to the rules and regulations set forth for general accounting standards with regards to the generally accepted auditing procedures that all government entities and corporations follow. In short, nothing new will be created or presented because of this bill. You can read about these associations at the FASAB here: http://fasab.gov/accounting-standards/authoritative-source-of-gaap/)

H.R. 459 continued…

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘Federal Reserve Transparency Act of 2011’.

SEC. 2. AUDIT REFORM AND TRANSPARENCY FOR THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM.

(a) In General- Notwithstanding section 714 of title 31, United States Code, or any other provision of law, an audit of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal reserve banks under subsection (b) of such section 714 shall be completed before the end of 2012.

(Transparent, as defined by the World English Dictionary, means “easy to see through, understand or recognize; obvious, candid, open, or frank“. Thus, one would think that this “transparency bill” would not be specificaly written with regards to just one individual code or law, leaving so many other aspect of the law untouched. And one would think that such an Act would state quite clearly that: this act, when signed into law, would require a full and comprehensive one-time audit of the Federal Reserve System and all of its activities since its inception, without any limitations whatsoever [notwithstanding] that are already in place within the legal system and US CODE. But this is not the case. As we read further, we find that this bill does not create a new audit in any way, but instead only technically modifies slightly the already existing Comptroller General’s personal audit of the Federal Reserve Board Of Governors under TITLE 31 as it is reported to Congress – which is limited to this TITLE and section, stated above as “an audit of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal reserve banks under subsection (b) of such section 714“. Since no other law affects this section [714], the misleading “notwithstanding” portion of this paragraph means absolutely nothing to the rest of U.S. CODE or to these generally accepted auditing standards, practices, and rules. Again, no new audit is created, only a slightly expanded version of the already existing Comptroller General’s audit as already required by the Federal Reserve Act (congress), Section 2b. In other words, a full audit per the definition of “full” via government standards by the Comptroller General will already be completed before the end of 2012 and for every year to follow, with or without this bills passage, because it is already the law!!!)

H.R. 459 continued…

(b) Report-

(1) IN GENERAL- A report on the audit (already) required under subsection (a) shall be submitted by the Comptroller General to the Congress before the end of the 90-day period beginning on the date on which such audit is completed and made available to the Speaker of the House, the majority and minority leaders of the House of Representatives, the majority and minority leaders of the Senate, the Chairman and Ranking Member of the committee and each subcommittee of jurisdiction in the House of Representatives and the Senate, and any other Member of Congress who requests it.

(Here it states that a “report” on the already existing and required audit of the Comptroller General must be submitted to Congress. A report? So Ron Paul only wants a report on the audit of the Federal Reserve System, and not the audit itself? Again, this full financial audit already exists – it’s called the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report [CAFR]. But this audit will do nothing to benefit the people or congress, for the information found within these audits is not only legal, but will show absolutely nothing with regards to money or assets that can be used by Congress in its legislation. Their own law does not allow them to utilize the vast amounts of wealth shown within the audit [CAFR] for taxpayer benefits and services. This Act will do nothing towards the utilization of this Federal Reserve wealth for the benefit of national debt or for the benefit of the people, and it is not supposed to.)

H.R. 459 continued…

(2) CONTENTS- The report under paragraph (1) shall include a detailed description of the findings and conclusion of the Comptroller General with respect to the audit that is the subject of the report, together with such recommendations for legislative or administrative action as the Comptroller General may determine to be appropriate.

(Yet again we see that this “report”, which is based upon the already existing audit of the Comptroller General, will be nothing more than the biased opinion [findings and conclusion] of the Comptroller General with respect to the actual audit (which Congress still wont see), followed by the Comptroller General’s recommendations for legal action against the Federal Reserve. But the Comptroller General of the United States is complicit in and oversees the actions of the Federal Reserve on behalf of the Treasury of the United States Federal Government!!! So this would be like asking the Pope or the head financial officer of the Catholic Church to incriminate one of the many for-profit entities of the Catholic Corporation called the Vatican, revealing a complete audit of the vaults underneath Vatican City in a one-time report. Good luck with that. Remember, the Comptroller General is an employee of the United States government, and is not there for the benefit of the people, no more than the auditor general of Target or Walmart is there for the benefit of the people over the corporation. Make no mistake… the Comptroller General can come out at any time he wishes, without a law that tells him he must, and spill the entire can of beans on the Federal Reserve. But he’d be dead, his family would be dead, or he’d in jail tomorrow for his betrayal. The Comptroller General is the head of the Government Accounting Office (a delegated authority), where the Federal Reserve is required to hand over its audited financial statements. So the Comptroller General is literally the gate-keeper of this information. And Ron Paul wants a “report” on the audit from this guy??? Really? And this act of futility has inspired a whole generation…)

H.R. 459 continued…

(c) Repeal of Certain Limitations- Subsection (b) of section 714 of title 31, United States Code, is amended by striking all after ‘in writing.’.

(d) Technical and Conforming Amendment- Section 714 of title 31, United States Code, is amended by striking subsection (f).

END OF BILL

Here, at the end of this Act, we get to the good stuff. Re-enforcing the fact that this bill does not do one thing except to change one small portion of one small section within US CODE with regards to just one of the two already existing audits that are already conducted on the Federal Reserve System, this last part is perhaps the most deceiving rhetoric I have ever witnessed in a proposed legislation. Keeping in mind that this “Transparency” bill is supposed to create transparency for Congress… let’s see what section 714 of title 31 actually says in US CODE:

Paragraph (c) above refers to the following, under subsection (b) of TITLE 31, Section 714:

(b) Under regulations of the Comptroller General, the Comptroller General shall audit an agency, but may carry out an onsite examination of an open insured bank or bank holding company only if the appropriate agency has consented in writing. Audits of the Board and Federal reserve banks may not include

(1) transactions for or with a foreign central bank, government of a foreign country, or nonprivate international financing organization;

(2) deliberations, decisions, or actions on monetary policy matters, including discount window operations, reserves of member banks, securities credit, interest on deposits, and open market operations;

(3) transactions made under the direction of the Federal Open Market Committee; or

(4) a part of a discussion or communication among or between members of the Board and officers and employees of the Federal Reserve System related to clauses (1)–(3) of this subsection.

-End Code-

Firstly, this section of US CODE only refers to the audit conducted by the Comptroller General, and not to the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR). Thus, the CAFR is entirely unaffected by this bill. So right away we must ask why this is the case?

Second, this section states that the Comptroller General, when conducting his audit, may not include within that audit the above enumerated items. Now I will be the first to call foul on any verbiage in the law that allows secrecy or has clauses promoting secrecy in government. But this is not the issue, and in fact I would say that on the surface this is the only section in this entire bill that would actually accomplish something good, by removing these secrecy clauses from the US CODE. But we must look closely at the wording of this bill as it pertains to this intended alteration of this section of US CODE. For legal language is very deceiving to the average person. It is a secret language, and each legal term has a deeper and more binding meaning than that of our everyday rhetoric. Legalese is binding, whereas everyday language is not – unless spoken in a legal or contractual setting.

Paragraph (c) from the “Federal Reserve Transparency Bill” states:

(c) Repeal of Certain Limitations- Subsection (b) of section 714 of title 31, United States Code, is amended by striking all after ‘in writing.’.

This paragraph will do exactly what it says it will do. It will strike all of subsection (b) in section 714 of Title 31 after the words “in writing”. This will change subsection (b) so that it will read in it’s entirety as the following:

(b) Under regulations of the Comptroller General, the Comptroller General shall audit an agency, but may carry out an onsite examination of an open insured bank or bank holding company only if the appropriate agency has consented in writing.

What will this accomplish?

Absolutely nothing.

In fact, it makes things worse!

This states quite succinctly that the Comptroller General may ask permission from the Federal Reserve Board or any open insured bank or bank holding company to conduct an audit, but that the specific “agency” must give its consent before such an audit or examination can be conducted. Remember, the president (executive branch) is limited in its authority over the Fed because of Congressional law, and the Comptroller General is a member (employee) of the Executive Branch of government. The Comptroller General’s power is nothing more than a delegation of authority by the president of the executive branch, and this Comptroller position carries no more authority than that of the president himself.

When we take this into consideration, we must then ask: why would Ron Paul, being in the legislative branch (the branch that created and ultimately controls the Fed), sponsor a bill that would only effect the law as it applies to the executive branch (Comptroller), of which the congress has no absolute power over?

Why would congressman Ron Paul create this law to be outside of the realm of congressional control, retaining the discretion and control of the audit within the executive office of the Comptroller General, all the while retaining the requirement of consent by the very entity being audited – the Federal Reserve System?

By not removing this consent clause of Title 31, Section 714, the Federal Reserve as an independent agency of the United States government may simply refuse to be audited (publicly) on the very things that would be stricken from this code by Ron Paul’s bill. And this will serve to fuel the fire of patriot rhetoric and controlled opposition alternative radio hosts as, once again, Ben Bernanke states to Congress that the Fed does not have to testify or present the audited facts that the congressional hearing is requesting… BECAUSE CONGRESS (GOVERNMENT) DOESN’T WANT IT STATED IN PUBLIC HEARINGS AND CREATED THE LAW THAT ALLOWS THE FED CHAIRMAN TO STATE THIS IN THE HEARING!!!

This revised law would state that the Fed must consent in writing to be audited by the Comptroller General, and can in fact deny the auditing process!

Does that sound like it would make the Federal Reserve in any way more “transparent” ???

In fact, if the Act was written so that it took away this consent clause, then and only then would this Act actually do anything to change the auditing process. But I would submit that this Act and this subsection would actually make the transparency of the auditing process less apparent and applicable in Congress (at least in public forums). Whereas before this bill would be passed, the limitations of this audit were specifically enumerated to the four (4) listed items that could not be and would not be written into the audit per US CODE, now this subsection technically states that all aspects of the Federal Reserve’s transactions can be refused without its written consent, not just the enumerated ones.

This, in turn, would technically give the Federal Reserve even greater delegated independence from Congress!!!

But only from Congress…

Because finally, the last subsection in HR 459 states:

(d) Technical and Conforming Amendment- Section 714 of title 31, United States Code, is amended by striking subsection (f).

What does this refer to? Section 714 of Title 31, subsection (f) as is currently written states the following:

(f) Audits of Credit Facilities of the Federal Reserve System.—

(1) Definitions.— In this subsection, the following definitions shall apply:

(A) Credit facility.— The term “credit facility” means a program or facility, including any special purpose vehicle or other entity established by or on behalf of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System or a Federal reserve bank, authorized by the Board of Governors under section 13(3) of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 343), that is not subject to audit under subsection (e).

(B) Covered transaction.— The term “covered transaction” means any open market transaction or discount window advance that meets the definition of “covered transaction” in section 11(s) of the Federal Reserve Act.

(2) Authority for audits and examinations.— Subject to paragraph (3), and notwithstanding any limitation in subsection (b) on the auditing and oversight of certain functions of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System or any Federal reserve bank, the Comptroller General of the United States may conduct audits, including onsite examinations, of the Board of Governors, a Federal reserve bank, or a credit facility, if the Comptroller General determines that such audits are appropriate, solely for the purposes of assessing, with respect to a credit facility or a covered transaction—

(A) the operational integrity, accounting, financial reporting, and internal controls governing the credit facility or covered transaction;

(B) the effectiveness of the security and collateral policies established for the facility or covered transaction in mitigating risk to the relevant Federal reserve bank and taxpayers;

(C) whether the credit facility or the conduct of a covered transaction inappropriately favors one or more specific participants over other institutions eligible to utilize the facility; and

(D) the policies governing the use, selection, or payment of third-party contractors by or for any credit facility or to conduct any covered transaction.

(Please note here that the word “notwithstanding” is defined by the Random House Dictionary as: “in spite of; without being opposed or prevented by”. Therefore, this verbiage states that the Comptroller General is in fact NOT limited by paragraph (b) of this Title with regards to his office conducting an audit of the Federal Reserve at his or her discretion. In other words, the Comptroller General per this part of US CODE has authority over the Federal Reserve if he chooses to enforce it, and can at any time require a complete audit of any and all Federal reserve transactions, despite and without the consent of the Fed or its board, including these enumerated items in paragraph (b). By taking away this entire subsection of US CODE, this makes the Audit the Fed bill complicit in removing the verbiage of the already existing US CODE that gives the Comptroller General total discretionary auditing power over the consent of the Federal Reserve System!)

(So you must ask yourself: Why would Ron Paul wish to remove such an important distinction and allow the Federal Reserve to refuse an audit by the Comptroller General? And for what possible reason would Congressman Paul leave in the law the privilege of non-consent that is currently afforded to the Federal Reserve System?)

(I believe that these questions are impossible to answer without conceding to the fact that Ron Paul is controlled opposition and is playing the people, his constituents, and his” fans” like a fiddle.)

TITLE 31, Section 714 continued…

(3) Reports and delayed disclosure.—

(A) Reports required.— A report on each audit conducted under paragraph (2) shall be submitted by the Comptroller General to the Congress before the end of the 90-day period beginning on the date on which such audit is completed.

(B) Contents.— The report under subparagraph (A) shall include a detailed description of the findings and conclusions of the Comptroller General with respect to the matters described in paragraph (2) that were audited and are the subject of the report, together with such recommendations for legislative or administrative action relating to such matters as the Comptroller General may determine to be appropriate.

(Once again, there is no reason to remove these two sections. In fact, this is what the new HR 459 states as its purpose – a report on the audit.)

TITLE 31, Section 714 continued…

(C) Delayed release of certain information.—

(i) In general.— The Comptroller General shall not disclose to any person or entity, including to Congress, the names or identifying details of specific participants in any credit facility or covered transaction, the amounts borrowed by or transferred by or to specific participants in any credit facility or covered transaction, or identifying details regarding assets or collateral held or transferred by, under, or in connection with any credit facility or covered transaction, and any report provided under subparagraph (A) shall be redacted to ensure that such names and details are not disclosed.

(ii) Delayed release.— The nondisclosure obligation under clause (i) shall expire with respect to any participant on the date on which the Board of Governors, directly or through a Federal reserve bank, publicly discloses the identity of the subject participant or the identifying details of the subject assets, collateral, or transaction.

(Note here that subparagraph (i) is nullified by subparagraph (ii), stating that (i) will “expire” whenever (ii) happens. This in no way limits the release of information, but only delays that full release of information for the benefit of the Fed’s clients.)

TITLE 31, Section 714 continued…

(iii) General release.— The Comptroller General shall release a nonredacted version of any report on a credit facility 1 year after the effective date of the termination by the Board of Governors of the authorization for the credit facility. For purposes of this clause, a credit facility shall be deemed to have terminated 24 months after the date on which the credit facility ceases to make extensions of credit and loans, unless the credit facility is otherwise terminated by the Board of Governors.

(Princeton University defines the word redact – to prepare for publication or presentation by correcting, revising, or adapting; formulate in a particular style or language. Therefore, Congressman Ron Paul’s bill will halt the Comptroller General from releasing a nonredacted [unaltered] report.)

TITLE 31, Section 714 continued…

(iv) Exceptions.— The nondisclosure obligation under clause (i) shall not apply to the credit facilities Maiden Lane, Maiden Lane II, and Maiden Lane III.

(The Maiden Lane corporations will now be less transparent to Congress under HR 459.)

TITLE 31, Section 714 continued…

(v) Release of covered transaction information.— The Comptroller General shall release a nonredacted version of any report regarding covered transactions upon the release of the information regarding such covered transactions by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, as provided in section 11(s) of the Federal Reserve Act.

-End current CODE-

(The Federal Reserve Board will no longer be required (by Congress) to release a nonredacted (unedited) version of reports of “covered transactions”. How is this a good thing?)

–=–

Or… You Could Just Ask For It!

–=–

It is interesting to note that the Code Of Federal Regulations (CFR) states that if you just simply create a subpoena requesting the audited financial reports, anyone can freely obtain the audit.

4 CFR 82 – FURNISHING RECORDS OF THE GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE IN JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS

(4 CFR 82.1) – Court subpoenas or requests.

(a) A subpoena or request from a court for records of the Government Accountability Office should be directed to the Comptroller General of the United States and served upon the Records Management and Services Officer, Office of Information Systems and Services.

(b) In honoring a court subpoena or request original records may be presented for examination but must not be presented as evidence or otherwise used in any manner by reason of which they may lose their identity as official records of the Government Accountability Office. They must not be marked or altered, or their value as evidence impaired, destroyed, or otherwise affected. In lieu of the original records, certified copies will be presented for evidence purposes since they are admitted in evidence equally with the originals (31 U.S.C. 704).

Are we to believe that the Congress does not have the authority of requiring judicial review? I assure you, the Senate and House Ethics Committees have this authority – though they seldom use it, as this would expose their collective and very well organized crime within this den of honorable thieves.

TITLE 31 Section 704 (referenced above) states:

(a) To the extent applicable, all laws generally related to administering an agency apply to the Comptroller General.

(b) A copy of a record and a transcript from a record or proceeding of the Comptroller General, that the Comptroller General or Deputy Comptroller General certifies under seal, shall be admitted as evidence with the same effect as a copy or transcript referred to in section 1733 of title 28.

–=–

An Unfortunate Conclusion

–=–

Without apologies, this research and writing should in no way be misinterpreted as any form of support for the Federal Reserve System or the usury that supports its organized crime by myself, or that this is just some personal attack on Ron Paul. You’ve missed the whole point of my unbiased, not-for-profit efforts here if that is your conclusion. Again, this is simply information, important information, that you should consider before placing such fervent and un-withering faith in any man. A member of a corporation or in the allegiance of a political party is not acting as a man, but as a corporate person representing only special interests.

In the end, as we have read, this whole thing is a fraud. It is deception of the most intricately clever kind. It represents the epitome of the downfall of the American people and the destruction of our country; which relies on the good intentions and hope and faith of its voting public. In short, this bill represents the ultimate power of misinformation and the controlled opposition that is beholden of it. We are a defeated people in all respects of our lives – from education to incarceration – from corporate politics to corporate religion – from financial usury to medical malfeasance… all of which is made possible by the actions and inaction of Congress.

And yet we are all supposed to believe the old cry of the oppressors… Poor Congress. They’ve got their hands tied. They aren’t allowed to see certain things. They are powerless. On and on and on…

And yet it is their own hands for which they themselves tie in red tape created by themselves, and they are laughing all the way to the international World Bank while switching back and forth between the public and private sectors, becoming board members, CEO’s, and special issue stock-holders of the very corporations they are supposed to be regulating.

Silly sheep, tricks are for us.

And for all of us, I end this rant with my favorite quote:

–=–

“None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.”

–Johann Wolfgang von Goethe–

–=–

.

–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Saturday, June 23, 2012

Ron Paul Is Not A Sell Out?


“In politics, nothing happens by accident.
If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way.”

–Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Mitt Romeny’s 8th cousin, twice removed–

I’ve received several notifications that Rand Paul, Ron Paul’s son, is officially lending his “support” to Mitt Romney and will be campaigning for the Romney bid for the presidency. Of course, this came as no surprise to me or to those others who’ve been persecuted for our expose’s on presidential candidate Ron Paul (and family). Many of these notes state that Ron Paul himself has or will “sell out” the people who supported him via this clandestine nepotism.

But can you sell out if you never bought in?

Can you win if you never plan to?

Over the last year or so, billions of dollars have been pumped into the Democratic and Republican Party nomination process for President of the United States of America. This process is for some reason considered normal to most Americans. And yet, let’s look at a few facts:

1) The Republican and Democratic Parties are 100% private non-governmental associations.

2) The winner of these private “elections” have absolutely nothing to do with the lawful and constitutional election process that takes place once every four years in November.

3) The men or women who are chosen to actually run for president represent the interests of the party, not the people of the United States.

4) The outcome of these private association elections is pre-determined. Men are primed for these positions well in advance. Romney is no exception. This is not illegal, as the election is for a private, non-governmental corporation.

5) Mitt Romney, John Huntsman, Bush, Cheney, Obama, Biden, Sarah Palin, John McCain, and all other past presidents are cousins. These private associations serve no other purpose than to place bloodline family members into the presidency, and to ensure that the right/left candidates are cousins – so as to ensure the continuity of blood.

(LINK–> http://www.geni.com/blog/look-whos-related-george-washington-and-all-the-presidents-325451.html)

6) Mitt Romney has already announced over 20 duel-Israeli citizens for his cabinet – many of the same men and women from the Bush Cabinet. (Of course, Romney and Bush are 10th cousins, only twice removed, so naturally they are just keeping it in the family tradition.)

(LINK–>http://newsfeed.time.com/2011/12/20/family-ties-ancestry-com-finds-that-romney-and-george-w-are-cousins/)

7) Obama is no exception:

So why was Ron Paul running for the Republican private corporation (Party) nomination and not as a free and independent man?

A Libertarian and a Republican are not the same thing, are they?

Perhaps this may help explain things…

For many months I and others have tried in vein to show the inevitable outcome of the Republican nomination. For many years, several former Ron Paul regional campaign managers and myself have been asking: What happened to the over $40 million from the 2008 Ron Paul campaign? I’ve exposed the fact that Ron Paul’s “Audit The Fed Bill” is a red herring, which would not change anything about the already existing audit of the Fed (the CAFR). And for all of this time I’ve been exposing Paul’s lack of coverage of the CAFR accounting system of government, and that the Federal Reserve is now and always has been audited…

And for this I’ve gotten a majority response of irrationality and negativity despite the verifiable facts presented. And even as millions upon millions were given to the Ron Paul “campaign” this year by well-intentioned but naive people, I received virtually no support for my own efforts to run as an independent man for president, not a private corporation (party) shill, and the people who could actually fix this country are either destitute or in jail, with no one standing up for their freedom.

I’m here to say today to those who claim to be awake, that you need to realize your disposition – you are in a dream within a dream…

Ron Paul is a Republican Party member. His family’s nepotistic loyalty to this non-governmental private association over the people of America is apparent through this action of his son’s official support for Mitt Romney – a fake enemy yesterday, a real friend today. Dr. Paul will follow with his concession and his support, like a good party member. No amount of words; no amount of anti-war speeches; no amount of anti-banking or anti-FED propaganda; and no amount of anti-Romney/Bush/Obama rhetoric and speeches will change this fact.

Break free… the party system is the death of the American election process. Electing a party member equals electing an entire private, non-governmental association as president. It means electing a corporation, not a man. And AT BEST it means that only party members are represented, leaving at least 50% of the people and their children without any representation at all.

Check out these family trees, and please rethink your vote for the same old bloodline cousins of the Queen of England (now supported by Rand Paul) this year:

-=- The Hutchinson Family Chart -=-
LINK–>
https://www.familysearch.org/learn/wiki/en/images/0/02/Hutchinson_pedigree.jpg

-=- The Howland Family Chart – =-
LINK–>
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_3Nq4V6ez3vg/TNdR-KBc7NI/AAAAAAAAAME/PaLJyBg78Ss/s1600/Howland+Pedigree.jpg

(Note: the Mormon founder and “Prophet”
Joseph Smith is also Romney’s bloodline cousin)

“Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again
and expecting different results.”

“We cannot solve our problems with
the same thinking we used when we created them.”

–Albert Einstein–

.

–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com) (Clint4P.com)
–Saturday, June 9th, 2012