Ron Paul Is Not A Sell Out?


“In politics, nothing happens by accident.
If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way.”

–Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Mitt Romeny’s 8th cousin, twice removed–

I’ve received several notifications that Rand Paul, Ron Paul’s son, is officially lending his “support” to Mitt Romney and will be campaigning for the Romney bid for the presidency. Of course, this came as no surprise to me or to those others who’ve been persecuted for our expose’s on presidential candidate Ron Paul (and family). Many of these notes state that Ron Paul himself has or will “sell out” the people who supported him via this clandestine nepotism.

But can you sell out if you never bought in?

Can you win if you never plan to?

Over the last year or so, billions of dollars have been pumped into the Democratic and Republican Party nomination process for President of the United States of America. This process is for some reason considered normal to most Americans. And yet, let’s look at a few facts:

1) The Republican and Democratic Parties are 100% private non-governmental associations.

2) The winner of these private “elections” have absolutely nothing to do with the lawful and constitutional election process that takes place once every four years in November.

3) The men or women who are chosen to actually run for president represent the interests of the party, not the people of the United States.

4) The outcome of these private association elections is pre-determined. Men are primed for these positions well in advance. Romney is no exception. This is not illegal, as the election is for a private, non-governmental corporation.

5) Mitt Romney, John Huntsman, Bush, Cheney, Obama, Biden, Sarah Palin, John McCain, and all other past presidents are cousins. These private associations serve no other purpose than to place bloodline family members into the presidency, and to ensure that the right/left candidates are cousins – so as to ensure the continuity of blood.

(LINK–> http://www.geni.com/blog/look-whos-related-george-washington-and-all-the-presidents-325451.html)

6) Mitt Romney has already announced over 20 duel-Israeli citizens for his cabinet – many of the same men and women from the Bush Cabinet. (Of course, Romney and Bush are 10th cousins, only twice removed, so naturally they are just keeping it in the family tradition.)

(LINK–>http://newsfeed.time.com/2011/12/20/family-ties-ancestry-com-finds-that-romney-and-george-w-are-cousins/)

7) Obama is no exception:

So why was Ron Paul running for the Republican private corporation (Party) nomination and not as a free and independent man?

A Libertarian and a Republican are not the same thing, are they?

Perhaps this may help explain things…

For many months I and others have tried in vein to show the inevitable outcome of the Republican nomination. For many years, several former Ron Paul regional campaign managers and myself have been asking: What happened to the over $40 million from the 2008 Ron Paul campaign? I’ve exposed the fact that Ron Paul’s “Audit The Fed Bill” is a red herring, which would not change anything about the already existing audit of the Fed (the CAFR). And for all of this time I’ve been exposing Paul’s lack of coverage of the CAFR accounting system of government, and that the Federal Reserve is now and always has been audited…

And for this I’ve gotten a majority response of irrationality and negativity despite the verifiable facts presented. And even as millions upon millions were given to the Ron Paul “campaign” this year by well-intentioned but naive people, I received virtually no support for my own efforts to run as an independent man for president, not a private corporation (party) shill, and the people who could actually fix this country are either destitute or in jail, with no one standing up for their freedom.

I’m here to say today to those who claim to be awake, that you need to realize your disposition – you are in a dream within a dream…

Ron Paul is a Republican Party member. His family’s nepotistic loyalty to this non-governmental private association over the people of America is apparent through this action of his son’s official support for Mitt Romney – a fake enemy yesterday, a real friend today. Dr. Paul will follow with his concession and his support, like a good party member. No amount of words; no amount of anti-war speeches; no amount of anti-banking or anti-FED propaganda; and no amount of anti-Romney/Bush/Obama rhetoric and speeches will change this fact.

Break free… the party system is the death of the American election process. Electing a party member equals electing an entire private, non-governmental association as president. It means electing a corporation, not a man. And AT BEST it means that only party members are represented, leaving at least 50% of the people and their children without any representation at all.

Check out these family trees, and please rethink your vote for the same old bloodline cousins of the Queen of England (now supported by Rand Paul) this year:

-=- The Hutchinson Family Chart -=-
LINK–>
https://www.familysearch.org/learn/wiki/en/images/0/02/Hutchinson_pedigree.jpg

-=- The Howland Family Chart – =-
LINK–>
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_3Nq4V6ez3vg/TNdR-KBc7NI/AAAAAAAAAME/PaLJyBg78Ss/s1600/Howland+Pedigree.jpg

(Note: the Mormon founder and “Prophet”
Joseph Smith is also Romney’s bloodline cousin)

“Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again
and expecting different results.”

“We cannot solve our problems with
the same thinking we used when we created them.”

–Albert Einstein–

.

–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com) (Clint4P.com)
–Saturday, June 9th, 2012

Federal Reserve Notes Are Backed By Gold


Retraction: After many quite personal attacks on my character, it has been pointed out to me that the “gold” in question is pledged to the Federal Reserve specifically as collateral, meaning that the Treasury must pay the contract if the Federal Reserve calls in the “collateral”. I don’t mind being wrong, and will always endeavor to correct such mistakes. But I must say the abuse is intolerable (in the comments below) from what are supposed to be the good guys; “the people”. This gives little hope of our future as an organized group of people. I apologize for being tricked by this misleading writing, and hope to correct that here:

Here is a comment from Walter Burien, correcting my error:

The report Clint sent out was a trap he fell into after certain circumstances of reporting changed to hide the assignment of the Treasury gold to the FR.

Most would not have caught the word play for misrepresentation now revised in the reports including maybe myself if I looked for the first time now. Being that I looked over a decade ago, that is why I caught it.

In reference to Clint: “This is the problem with most Americans today.” and that is 99% not accurate in reference to Clint.

He has done what 1 out of a million would do and that is take the time and have the intelligence; fortitude; and will to “look”. We all get caught in traps from time to time. You should not diminish him for having done so…

Note 19 on page 101: “Notes to the Financial Statements” and line item values listed.

Page 102. The key phrase is the last sentence:

“All of the Department of the Treasury’s certificates issued are payable to the Federal Reserve banks.”

Being gold certificates issued by the Treasury, the word “payable” means payable in gold.

Now I did notice they are doing something differently then they were doing in 1999. They are now “floating” the certificates back and forth between the federal reserve member banks redeemable in dollars and foreign currency. There is no physical gold that changes hands, just the paper certificates. I mentioned to look at the 1999 Federal AFR being the wording and the swaps of certificates were not being done then and there was no word play. The “gold was pledged to the Federal reserve by “gold certificates” to do what they do. If the Federal Reserve called up those certificates, the FR got the gold in redemption of those certificates.

As I mentioned I put out a CAFR1 post eight years ago on that point and Opps, the gang had to cover their asses in extended word play and the new certificate swaps to blur what they did in the “give up” of the gold by certificates issued at $42 oz.

Hell probably hit the fan when the full Congress and the Senate realized what had been done and thus implemented the gold certificate swaps to generate money for the Treasury.

If the Federal Reserve had ever “called up” the original certificates issued and took possession of the gold, the Treasury would not have had the ability to profit off the gold certificate swaps. The treasury would no longer have the gold in their possession to do so. I note the gold certificates is a VERY small percentage of the value listed in the Federal Reserve’s AFR.

Being that I now have had to focus on this issue, I now understand the play push to audit the Federal Reserve “members” of if which done would collapse the Federal Reserve’s participation of and from member banks. It was used as a pressure point to accomplish several points. One to force the FR into taking on more US Debt between the members (as the increase is noted in both the FR and Federal Government’s AFR report’s notes) and also probably to force the ability to use the gold certificates (never redeemed for the physical gold) through in and out swaps in trade mandating return of the certificates (owned by the FR) on call where the “Treasury” directly benefited from that activity.

–Walter

***Note that Walter alludes to the most important aspect here: the collusion – not competition – between the Federal Reserve and the Treasury. And the gold, of course, can’t just be ignored. It is the peoples wealth pledged without acquiescence to contract.

.

And here was the original post:

It is always good to know that the sacrifices I’ve made and the endless hours of research I’ve done don’t just fall on deaf ears…

I received an email a couple of days ago from a reader of my blog, who went above and beyond the call of duty to verify the research in my recent videos, not just taking it at face value. If only all of us did this with each others research, we would no doubt have a whole lot less confusion in our search for “truth”.

Besides my gratitude, I would also offer this man my highest accommodation of valor (if I had one) for taking the time to not only find the Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports (CAFR’s) I mentioned, but to read them and link them in his email.

Thank you, sir!

I’d like to share that email here…

“John Smith” wrote:

————————
–Begin excerpt–
————————

Fact: The Federal Reserve Notes are backed by gold.

Yes, you read that right. The Federal Reserve notes are backed by gold.

Hitler (Joseph Goebbels) was right when he said, “If you repeat a lie enough times, people will believe it (paraphrase).”

I know what you are thinking. OK, John. Prove it.

If you look at page 453 and 490 of  the 2009 Annual Financial Report of the Federal Reserve (CAFR) you will see there actually is collateral held against Federal Reserve Notes. This means the money we use is backed by something.

(LINK – http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/rptcongress/annual09/pdf/ar09.pdf)

What is it backed by?

There is the Gold Certificate Account (The Fed has the gold and the Treasury has the certificates.)

How much gold?

$11,037,000,ooo. worth of gold. This can also be found on page 61 of the Federal Government’s CAFR.
(LINK – http://www.gao.gov/financial/fy2010/10notes.pdf)

How many (troy) ounces (of gold) is backing the Federal Reserve Notes? On page 62, the last paragraph reads:

“Gold is valued at the statutory price of $42.2222 per fine troy ounce. The number of fine troy ounces was 261,498,900 as of September 30, 2010, and 2009. The market value of gold on the London Fixing was $1,307 and $996 per fine troy ounce as of September 30, 2010, and 2009, respectively. Gold totaling $11.1 billion as of September 30, 2010, and 2009, was pledged as collateral for gold certificates issued and authorized to the FRBs by the Secretary of the Treasury. Gold certificates were valued at $11.0 billion as of September 30, 2010, and 2009, which are included in Note 19—Other Liabilities. Treasury may redeem the gold certificates at any time. Foreign currency is translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate at fiscal year-end. The foreign currency is maintained by various U.S. Federal agencies and foreign banks.”

 

How much money (Federal Reserve Notes) is in circulation?

All of that hard and easily liquidated currency is known as the M0 money supply. This includes the bills and coins in people’s pockets and mattresses, the money on hand in bank vaults and all of the deposits those banks have at reserve banks. According to the Federal Reserve, there was $908.6 billion in the M0 supply stream as of July 2009.

(LINK –  http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h41/20090730/)

What is the real value of the Federal Reserve Notes?

This can be viewed 2 ways (statutory value or market value).

Let’s do some calculating:

The statutory price of gold is $42.2222 per ounce. The Fed is holding 261,498,900 ounces of gold This equals to $11,041,058,855.58 ($11 billion). There is $908,600,000,000 ($908 billion) in circulation. According to the statutory price of gold, the dollar is worth $.012 (Just over 1 cent per dollar).

The market price of gold is $1,307.00 per ounce. The Fed is holding 261,498,900 ounces of gold. This equals to $341,779,062,300.00 ($341.7 billion). There are $908,600,000,000 ($908 billion) in circulation. According to the market price of gold, the dollar is worth $0.37 (37 cents per dollar).

(Note: The average market price of gold is actually over $1,600 for November)

I guess the dollar really isn’t worth a dollar (in gold).

Warning: My lack of funds are being compensated by my knowledge.

———————-
–End excerpt–
———————-

Again, my congratulations to John for taking the initiative to research and verify the facts (instead of just insulting the messenger).

.

–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Monday, November 21, 2011

The Truth About The “Audit The Fed” Bill


This is a video blog…


I have had an amazing look into the paradigm of institutionalization ever since I began speaking negatively about the actions of Congressman Ron Paul. Out of the woodwork they came; people whom, without reason or rational thought, defend the career of one Dr. Ron Paul without prejudice or fact. And though I make every attempt to not attack Ron Paul in a personal way, only referring to his political motives and actions, and though I list him as someone I want on my own dream-team cabinet if I were elected President of this gigantic corporate structure called the United States… those people who refuse to see anything but the mature, angelic doctor guided by the hand of Jesus himself as presented in the propaganda images that have inundated the Ron Paul campaign have certainly attacked me.

I was and still am being taken by surprise by these ad hominem attacks on my personal character, the Strawman arguments regarding this virtually mythical man, the appeals to novelty, pity, and popularity regarding his campaign and the so-called “blackout” of it in the media, and the constant divergent red herrings that always lead to an emotionally fueled debate down a road other than the acknowledgment of the facts at hand. These fallacies have taken hold of otherwise logical folks and cleared the logic centers of their brains.

Of course, at no time has there been this kind of response from anyone who isn’t a Ron Paul supporter, which again leads me to the only reasonable comparison: Obama supporters – who are equally unable to ingest facts about their chosen candidate due to the prophet-like pedestal that Obama has been set upon by themselves.

Further research has now lead me to take upon myself more of this burden of personal attack by taking a closer examination of the Ron Paul “HR 459, The Audit the Fed Bill to the 112th Congress“, as described on Paul’s website.

Interesting to note here is that according to Ron Paul’s congressional (.gov) website, this bill’s predecessor:

HR 1207 garnered broad bi-partisan support with 320 cosponsors in the 111th Congress, and was attached (but removed in conference) as an amendment to the Dodd-Frank Financial Reform Bill“.

(Source: http://paul.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1822:audit-the-fed-reintroduced&catid=63:2011-press-releases)

This is especially confounding to me as this would have meant that this “Audit the Fed” bill had enough votes through its co-sponsors (320) to pass in congress as its own free-standing bill, among the 435 congress-people that would have voted on this bill. A simple majority of 218 votes would have passed this bill. And so the question of why this perfectly stable bill was attached to another bill instead as an amendment to that bill, where it could then be swatted away like a pesky fly, comes into question.

What did Congressman Paul have to say about this on the same (.gov) website?

“I was very pleased that so many of my colleagues were willing to stand up for transparency and accountability in government by cosponsoring HR 1207 in the last Congress.  I am optimistic about our prospects for a full and complete audit in the 112th Congress,” stated Congressman Paul.

In short, this was a colossal fail on the part of Ron Paul, allowing this bill to be arbitrarily removed from the law-books by allowing it to be transformed into an amendment instead of a bill! Whether or not this was a purposeful and preconceived failure is a question that I am not qualified to answer. But I will state that I believe this to be highly suspicious behavior for a bill that would otherwise be a sure thing.

It is also interesting to note that Ron Paul has sponsored another bill for this years session, H.R. 1496: Federal Reserve Transparency Act, 112th Congress: 2011-2012. Though this bill is identical to H.R. 459 except for the last paragraph, this bill has no co-sponsors whatsoever. What is most important to understand though is this statement, which is the description of the bill and what it strives to accomplish:

“To amend title 31, United States Code, to reform the manner in which the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System is audited by the Comptroller General of the United States and the manner in which such audits are reported, and for other purposes.”

(Source: http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h112-1496)

Sometimes we miss the most important things when we read them. Here it states “…the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System is audited…“. This tells us that the Board is already, in fact, audited. It also states that the goal of this bill is “…to reform the manner in which…” that already existing audit is reported to Congress.

In fact, the Federal Reserve Act, which is of course codified into U.S. (Federal) CODE, (12USC 225b) states clearly that this audit already exists:

Section 2B. Appearances Before and Reports to the Congress

(b) Congressional report. The Board shall, concurrent with each semi-annual hearing required by this section, submit a written report to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Banking and Financial Services of the House of Representatives, containing a discussion of the conduct of monetary policy and economic developments and prospects for the future, taking into account past and prospective developments in employment, unemployment, production,investment, real income, productivity, exchange rates, international trade and payments, and prices.

[12 USC 225b. As added by act of Dec. 27, 2000 (114 Stat. 3028).]

(c) Public access to information. The Board shall place on its home Internet website, a link entitled `Audit, which shall link to a web page that shall serve as a repository of information made available to the public for a reasonable period of time, not less than 6 months following the date of release of the relevant information, including–

  1. the reports prepared by the Comptroller General under section 714 of title 31, United States Code; (Note: This is the only thing that is amended by the “Audit The Fed” bill.)
  2. the annual financial statements prepared by an independent auditor for the Board in accordance with section 11B; (Note: This is, in fact, the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR), the actual audit of the Federal Reserve.)
  3. the reports to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate required under section 13(3) (relating to emergency lending authority); and
  4. such other information as the Board reasonably believes is necessary or helpful to the public in understanding the accounting, financial reporting, and internal controls of the Board and the Federal reserve banks.

[12 USC 225b. As added by act of July 21, 2010 (124 Stat. 2118).]

And so we can see that the CAFR, which is the over 500 page audit of the Federal Reserve, is readily available to the public for its consumption. So it is, in this author’s opinion, safe to assume that the men and women of Congress, including Dr. Ron Paul, absolutely have access to this audit.

The real question that must be asked here is whether or not the Congress is actually allowed to take the audited financial information reported in the CAFR reports into consideration regarding its day to day legislation and budget, since it is not specifically mandated to be given as evidence to the Congress itself.

Just as every local, county, and state government prepares its financial measures and budgetary requirements for the people and their governance through the carefully selected portion of their Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports, which they call the “budget report”, is this also how Congress operates? Does Congress also receive a hand selected budget report for which it must operate under, not being allowed to take into consideration what is reported in the Comprehensive Audit of government as printed in the CAFR (fund investments, real estate investments, foreign currency and precious metals holdings, securities, and so much more)?

This would finally make the whole shell-game make sense!

If the Congress is not allowed to take the CAFR (audit) into consideration, and indeed only legislates through a limited and hand selected budget report that excludes the majority of liquid assets held by the Federal Government and funneled out of the taxpayer base into 1000’s of various investment funds and portfolios, then we can finally understand why our Congress can never create a balanced budget! And perhaps we can then begin to understand why Congressman Ron Paul does not talk about the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for government and its Federal Reserve Bank in any public forums, including within the halls of Congress.

A closer look at H.B. 459 reveals a startling conclusion… This bill does not create an audit of the Federal Reserve. That audit already exists, according to the writing of H.B. 459 itself, as well as its senate counterpart, S.202, sponsored by who else but Ron Paul’s son, Rand Paul, who was recently elected to the Senate.

In fact, the bill only refers to the Comptroller General under U.S.CODE, deleting only a few restrictions for what the comptroller general may audit from the Federal Reserve. This in no way creates a new audit or changes the current audit, or the CAFR.

Amazingly, while these cuts are not bad things by any means, the paragraph in H.B. 459 states the following:

(c) Repeal of Certain Limitations- Subsection (b) of section 714 of title 31, United States Code, is amended by striking all after ‘in writing.’.

(d) Technical and Conforming Amendment- Section 714 of title 31, United States Code, is amended by striking subsection (f).

Interestingly, it seems that subsection (f) has already been stricken, making paragraph (d) of these “Audit the Fed” bills redundant. However, in Ron Paul’s new bill H.B. 1496 – the one with no co-sponsors – this problem is addressed (see link above).

When we go to the U.S.CODE and read Section 714 of TITLE 31, we find the following:

(b) Under regulations of the Comptroller General, the Comptroller General shall audit an agency, but may carry out an onsite examination of an open insured bank or bank holding company only if the appropriate agency has consented in writing. Audits of the Board and Federal reserve banks may not include—

(1) transactions for or with a foreign central bank, government of a foreign country, or nonprivate international financing organization;
(2) deliberations, decisions, or actions on monetary policy matters, including discount window operations, reserves of member banks, securities credit, interest on deposits, and open market operations;
(3) transactions made under the direction of the Federal Open Market Committee; or
(4) a part of a discussion or communication among or between members of the Board and officers and employees of the Federal Reserve System related to clauses (1)–(3) of this subsection.

So this entire subsection will be amended to read as the following:

(b) Under regulations of the Comptroller General, the Comptroller General shall audit an agency, but may carry out an onsite examination of an open insured bank or bank holding company only if the appropriate agency has consented in writing.

Now, so that we are clear here… if the Federal Reserve Bank is allowed to retain the power of consent regarding which banks or bank holding companies that the Comptroller General is able to audit, then this whole paragraph is completely worthless. And the 4 subsections that are being cut out of this portion of this “Audit” bill might as well stay in the bill, for the Federal Reserve retains the power after amendment to simply say no!

Only if H.B. 459, s.202, and H.B. 1496, which are almost identical bills and are identical regarding this amendment… only if these bills were to have cut out the statement “only if the appropriate agency has consented in writing” would they actually accomplish any significant change in the accounting and auditing structure afforded in this CODE. In other words, this is a complete fail once again for Ron Paul, and now for his son. Once again, I cannot say for certain whether or not this colossal mistake was purposeful or not, but I must state with perfect clarity that I am starting to believethat there is a devious and purposeful betrayal here, using the lack of careful examination of the very supporters of this bill and the bill’s blatantly misleading semantics to fool Ron Paul’s fans into thinking this bill will do anything at all to change the auditing that already exists within the Comptroller General’s office.

In effect, these bills do absolutely nothing. And I find that highly suspicious and deeply concerning.

If, after reading this article and checking the provided sources and the U.S.CODE itself, you do not come to the same conclusion that I have here today, then I must admit that I am deeply concerned for my America and in the ability for its people to think for themselves.

And so, once again, I sight this research as just one of the reasons that I am running for President of the United States.

Let the insults and fallacies begin!

Please comment below…

.

–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Wednesday, November 16, 2011

National “Ask Ron Paul About The CAFR” Month


A gentleman named Richard was kind enough to write and tell me his experiences about trying to bring exposure to the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR). After repeatedly attempting to get the media and all major political campaigns to bring this information to the light of the people, his efforts were of course stepped upon.

Only if enough of the people (that’s you) demand that the Ron Paul Campaign For Liberty and other presidential campaigns start speaking of and divulging the government CAFR, including the Federal Reserve CAFR (the “audit” of the Fed) – this cooperative and complete cover-up will continue for all time.

As another reader commented…
“If you are going to attend any Ron Paul speaking engagements, I suggest you should print off a copy of the latest Federal Reserve Annual Financial Report and bring it with you. Every time Ron Paul mentiones the Federal Reserve, you hold the report up over your head at arms length for 5 seconds to show him you know the Fed is already being audited. I’m pretty sure after the first speech of this happening, he will come to realize that people elsewhere are learning the truth as well. It will also show you how many others in the audience know the truth. If you get to shake his hand, another thing to do would be to ask him for his autograph. If he agrees, ask him to autograph the cover of the Annual Financial Report.”  –John
I am posting Richard’s letter here:

Clint,

I just wanted to share with you my experience trying to get the word out regarding the CAFR scam.  After I had been introduced to the idea by Walter Burien, I saw your excellent movie (the corporation nation, part 1), and that explained it very well.  I am still studying the whole thing, and connecting it to many other parts of the puzzle I have been working on since about 1965.

But I understood enough to see what an effect it could have on society if this money were exposed, such as no more excuse for taxes, and no more municipalities using the excuse of being broke to cut services and raise fees, etc.  So I started taking the time to call media outlets all over the country.  This included TV, radio, newspapers, magazines, etc.  It was a very interesting experience.  In almost every case, the lower level employees that had no authority over anything were interested to learn more.  But as soon as it got to any minor managerial level, the investigation of what I presented was stopped immediately and communication was cut off.

My theory is that so many aspects of this go even deeper than we imagine, and all these media channels have already been threatened that they will cease to exist or worse, if they mention certain things, and CAFR is one of those. I think they all value their salaries, and will not even think of risking everything just to be honorable and inform the public. They are more like actors, just writing and speaking about what they are told is acceptable.

Then I started calling political offices all over the country, perhaps 100 of them or so, to see what their attitude would be.  It was pretty much the same. Some seemed interested at first, but soon cut off communication. It was pretty obvious that virtually all of them, regardless of party or political point of view, had been threatened or somehow scared into staying within certain limits.

As a last effort I called Ron Paul’s office, not once but perhaps 10 or 15 times. Many of the politicians are doing the excuse that if you are outside their district they will not even talk to you, yet they vote on bills that effect everyone. Complete hypocrisy in that policy. However, Ron’s office did not do that, and was very polite and the people there actually talked to me. That’s why I called them multiple times.

Many staffers were interested and may have watched the movie. However I was not able to get Ron himself to do anything with it publicly. I think he is a good man and honorable, and not under the direction of our rulers, but I also believe that getting assassinated is not his goal, and he may realize that could easily be the result of trying to bring up this topic. I have great appreciation for Ron for working on things like abolishing the fake “federal reserve,” the IRS, the income tax, withdrawing from criminal organizations like the UN, many unconstitutional treaties that are very bad for us, pushing strongly for health freedom which is in great danger right now, and just generally wanting to take government all the way back to its legitimate limits, eliminating much of what it does now, and he is the only major candidate even talking about these things. He has a very consistent and strong voting record for individual freedom, which I totally support. But I believe he knows about CAFR and knows also that his career would be over as well as his ability to continue his work, if he mentions CAFR.

I am still looking at other ways to expose CAFR so widely and quickly that it could not be stopped, something practical that could really accomplish this in our real life situation we are facing now. I am sure others are trying to figure that one out as well.  I am at least bringing it to the attention of others within my circles and it has been the first exposure for everyone I have mentioned it to. Thanks for helping me understand how it works, and especially for the detailed reports on specific states and cities, the examples are very helpful.  –Richard

.

–Clint Richardson(realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Sunday, November 6th, 2011

CAFR Confession


A friend and listener to our local AM station took our interview with the mayor of Salt Lake County, where he admits to the county CAFR and over $650 million in extra fund balances. He also included the CAFR pages I read from as reference.

Though I already posted the interview (audio only), I feel like this is the most important public official confession as to the wealth of the government as shown in government’s financial statements.

Please pass this on…

Also, learn more about government Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports (CAFR’s) with CAFR School, here:

Part 1: The State of Wisconsin CAFR –

https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2011/03/01/wisconsins-real-financial-situation-explained/

Part 2: Introduction to CAFR – City of Aurora, Co –

https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2011/03/03/cafr-school-a-lesson-in-financial-accounting/

Part 3: Advanced study – State of Minnesota CAFR –

https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2011/03/09/cafr-school-part-2-minnesotas-state-cafrs-explained/

Now compare these to your own local, county state, and school district CAFR’s.

.

–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Tuesday, July 12, 2011

 

 

 

 

Zionism 101: The Zionist Israeli Government Of The United States Of Amerika


Zionism 101: Part Two – See original in depth Zionism 101 here: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2010/06/11/zionism-101-the-complete-story/ (Recommended after this post)

“The Jewish people as a whole will become its own Messiah. It will attain world dominion by the dissolution of other races, by the abolition of frontiers, the annihilation of monarchy and by the establishment of a world republic in which the Jews will everywhere exercise the privilege of citizenship.

In this New World Order the children of Israel will furnish all the leaders without encountering opposition. The Governments of the different peoples forming the world republic will fall without difficulty into the hands of the Jews. It will then be possible for the Jewish rulers to abolish private property and everywhere to make use of the resources of the state. Thus will the promise of the Talmud be fulfilled, in which is said that when the Messianic time is come, the Jews will have all the property of the whole world in their hands.”

— Baruch Levy. Article: Letter to Karl Marx, in magazine ‘La Revue de Paris’, p.574, June 1, 1928

Our government is now completely in Zionist control. And the above quoted timeline is happening as we speak, just as was written so long ago. And obviously so, as the 10 planks of the Communist Manifesto are now law in the United States. (See them here: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2010/04/25/the-united-states-communist-manifesto/).

So, who is Zionist in the American government?

The following is a list of the power structure of the United States government, listed by seat of succession to the presidency of the United States. Remembering that all but one of these officers were not elected but appointed, that being the president who did the appointing, it is no wonder that every single one of them are admittedly Zionist, extremely pro-Israel, that many are of Jewish Israeli descent, and that some even have duel Israeli/American citizenship.

The following videos are out of their mouths, admissions and affirmations of their support for Zionism and for Israel. There is no other country in the world for which the United States or its “politicians” gives such fervent support. We are not “friends” of any other nation. And we are not “allies” with any Arab country… Of course, with a completely Jewish and Zionist cabal in complete and total power of the United States government, why would the Arab Middle-East be an ally or a friend to the United States – except through fear, dependence and coercion – nor a completely Israeli Zionist American government to its sworn enemy of the Arab nations?

Let’s have a look at the royal family of Obama’s APPOINTED cabinet:

#1 Barack Obama – It’s much easier to prove our presidents’ Zionist loyalty is not to America when a group called “Jewish Americans for Obama” comes right out and says it. Barack Obama might as well be Jewish. A true Muslim he most obviously is not… for if he were, his whole appointed staff would not be Jewish, duel-Israeli citizens, and/or Zionist! He wouldn’t be caught dead wearing a little Jewish Yamaka while visiting the Wailing Wall, and he most certainly would not support Israel and Zionism; the sworn enemy of all Arabs/Muslims!

“Those who threaten Israel, threaten us!” -Barack Obama

“Jerusalem will remain the capital of Israel, and it must remain undivided…” -Barack Obama

Imagine, a Muslim saying such things?

“There is a special connection between America and Israel. One that, when I traveled to Israel, was evident. Not only do we share so much in terms of common culture (usury, indecency, xenophobia, cruelty, immorality, etc…?) not only is it the sight of so much of our– of my religious faith, and the sight of so much of our understanding of the world around us… it is critical that we send a message around the world, we will stand with Israel. We want them around, not just for 60 years but for 600 years. And when I’m president of the United States they will have an unwavering ally in me.” -Barack Obama-

More of the same:

#1.5 Rahm Emmanuel (Chief of Staff) – Let’s face it, the chief of staff is the boss! The late Sherman Skolnick of Chicago called Rahm Emanuel the “Acting Deputy Chief for North America of the Mossad – Israeli Intelligence (http://www.cloakanddagger.de/media/S_284_S/Overthrow%20series/Rahm%20Emanuel.htm).” Skolnick went on to say that Emanuel’s father Benjamin had been “part of the Israeli assassin team that murdered Sweden’s Count [Folke] Bernadotte” in 1948. Bernadotte was the envoy of the United Nations in Palestine who sought to find a solution to the UN Partition Plan that gave Palestinian land to Jews from “beyond the pale.”

The Emanuel family name was Auerbach until 1936, although they are not related to the famous rabbinical family of Germany and Krakow named Auerbach. His father Ezekiel supposedly changed the family name to Emanuel when his son with that name died fighting Palestinians in 1936. Many Jewish families in Palestine changed their names to make themselves sound like they actually came from Palestine. And you wondered where all those Jews disappeared during World War II? Sheinerman became Sharon, Yezernitzky became Shamir, and Auerbach became Emanuel, and so on. And then multiply by a few hundred thousand. Voila! Millions of European Jews vanish from the face of the Earth – and build new lives in Palestine. -Christopher Bolyn-

Here is a news interview in which his military service in the Israeli army is admitted, and Emanuel quotes: “The best thing that can happen to Israel, is a strong America… because when America is strong, Israel is also strong.” And remember, Israel has over 200 nuclear weapons…

And why again would a Muslem (Obama) be a friend of Israel?

A completely Zionist, Israeli friendly appointed cabinet… this is why we will never have peace with the Middle East:

#2 Joe Biden – Biden was the first U.S. official to give Israel’s bloody assault (on an aid flotilla) a thumbs up. The former Delaware senator has been a key part of Israel’s Hasbara branch, American section, since entering the Senate in 1973 and on Wednesday, June 1st following the Israeli attack, he appeared on the Charlie Rose Show where he showed no hesitation in defending Israel’s handling of the raid (9 dead), something that President Obama had been reluctant to do.

Obama picked Biden “…who is about as close to the pro-Israel community as any member of either house…” observed MJ Rosenberg, a former AIPAC staffer, on TPM Café, just after Biden’s selection. “Biden is rated 100 per cent by AIPAC. When he goes to the synagogues in Florida, he goes not as a visitor but as ‘mishpocha’ [family]. The Jews simply love the guy… Bottom line, the Biden choice pretty much eliminated Obama’s ‘Jewish problem.” That was then and now it doesn’t seem to matter what position Obama takes, Biden seems to answer to his real boss. And it ain’t Barack. -CounterPunch (http://www.counterpunch.org/blankfort06112010.html)-

“I am a Zionist. You don’t have to be a Jew to be a Zionist.” -Joe Biden-

“Pollard should be given leniency.” -Joe Biden-

Pollard was the Israeli spy who caused the death of many U.S. spies in Russia, by revealing their identities. This is the very definition of treason. Israel is not our friend. Israel is the only country who continuously commits terrorist acts against the United States.

Enough said there Joe…

Here’s the self-proclaimed Zionist Joe Biden on the Charlie Rose show talking about the recent flotilla killings by Israeli soldiers of Turkish peace activists, calling for Israel to investigate itself on the murders in international waters:

#3 Nancy Pelosi – Pelosi reaffirms that “America and Israel share an unbreakable bond: in peace and war; and in prosperity and in hardship.” [Pelosi Press Release: http://web.archive.org/web/20060202151116/democraticleader.house.gov/press/releases.cfm?pressReleaseID=999] Pelosi emphasized that “a strong relationship between the United States and Israel has long been supported by both Democrats and Republicans. America’s commitment to the safety and security of the State of Israel is unwavering… however, the war in Iraq has made both America and Israel less safe.” Pelosi’s voting record shows consistent support for Israel. Prior to 2006 elections in the Palestinian Authority, she voted for a Congressional initiative disapproving of participation in the elections by Hamas and other organizations defined as terrorist by the legislation. She agrees with the current U.S. stance in support of land-for-peace. She has applauded Israeli “hopeful signs” of offering land, while criticizing Palestinian “threats” of not demonstrating peace in turn. She states, “If the Palestinians agree to coordinate with Israel on the evacuation, establish the rule of law, and demonstrate a capacity to govern, the world may be convinced that finally there is a real partner for peace”.

During the 2006 Lebanon War, Pelosi voted in favor of Resolution 921 on the count that “the seizure of Israeli soldiers by Hezbollah terrorists was an unprovoked attack and Israel has the right, and indeed the obligation, to respond”. She argues that organizations and political bodies in the Mideast like Hamas and Hezbollah “have a greater interest in maintaining a state of hostility with Israel than in improving the lives of the people they claim to represent”. Pelosi asserts that civilians on both sides of the border “have been put at risk by the aggression of Hamas and Hezbollah” in part for their use of “civilians as shields by concealing weapons in civilian areas”.

In September 2008, Pelosi hosted a reception in Washington with Israeli Knesset speaker Dalia Itzik, along with 20 members of Congress where they toasted the “strong friendship” between Israel and the United States. During the ceremony, Pelosi held up the replica dog tags of the three Israeli soldiers captured by Hezbollah and Hamas in 2006 and stated that she keeps them as a “symbol of the sacrifices made, sacrifices far too great by the people of the state of Israel”. Why should a representative of a state of our union be interested in the “state” of Israel? That’s how powerful the Israeli lobby is, and how infiltrated the United States government is. Here is Pelosi speaking at a Celebration of Israel’s 61st Independence Day, Washington, DC, 04/29/2009:

Once again, “You don’t have to be Jewish to be a Zionist.” -Joe Biden-

Ron Paul exposing Pelosi’s treasonous loyalty to Israel:

#4 Daniel Inouye (Japanese American) – Senator Daniel Inouye (D-HI) (eldest and by senatorial custom voted for in line of succession) as Chairman of the US Subcommittee on Defense, for his part, reaffirmed America’s commitment to the Zionist regime in a meeting with Ashkenazi and described Tehran’s uranium enrichment and long-range missile technologies as the ‘principal and most potent threat’ to Israel and the Middle East…

“I think that when the US helps Israel it actually helps itself,” he said.

#5 Hillary Rodham Clinton (Secretary of State) – Mrs. Clinton is of course a staunch supporter of Israel, standing firm with her husband. One generally stands beside the most powerful lobby in the world, even if it’s for another country. To go against AIPAC is brave, but political scuicide.

Here she is speaking at AIPAC about Iran and America’s commitment to Israel, even while speaking about Israel’s war crimes and illegal settlements into Palestinian land – having the gall to refer to the Palestinians as neighbors of Israel, which was all Palestinian land before the brutal and violent Zionist takeover of this land.

“We are determined to keep moving forward along a path that ensures Israel’s future as a secure and democratic Jewish state living in peace with its Palestinian and Arab neighbors.” -Hillary Clinton-

“…and in dealing with this (Iran) threat, as I have said for a very long time, no option can be taken off the table (refering of course to the nuclear option).” -Hillary Clinton-

*** Notice the disturbing mix of United States and Israeli flags around the AIPAC podium and Mrs. Clinton. I can’t find any other country in which this mixing of flags happens. Talk about unpatriotic!

#5 Timothy Geithner (Secretary of the Treasury) – A faithful member of the Council on Foreign Relations, The Bilderberg Group, The Center for Global Development (Board of Directors), The Economic Club of New York (trustee), The Bank for International Settlements – Committee On Payment and Settlement Systems (chairman)… as well as being the former President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, A former employee of Kissinger Associates, A former member of the Group Of Thirty (G30), former Director of the Policy Development and Review Department (2001–2003) at the International Monetary Fund, and many other Zionist controlled exploits. In March 2008, after his 2007 efforts to reduce the capital required to run a bank (reserve), he arranged the rescue and sale of Bear Stearns. In the same year, he played a supporting role to his predecessor Henry Paulson, former CEO of Zionist Goldman Sachs, in the decision to bail out AIG just two days after deciding not to rescue (not Zionist enough) Lehman Brothers from bankruptcy.

His father, Peter F. Geithner, was the director of the Asia program at the Ford Foundation in New York in the 1990s. During the early 1980s, Peter Geithner oversaw the Ford Foundation’s micro-finance programs in Indonesia being developed by Ann Dunham Soetoro, President Barack Obama’s mother.

So what are his loyalties to Israel and Zionism?

Considering the above ties, and his employment under staunch Zionists Robert Rubin, Larry Summers, Henry Kissinger, and his assignment as president of the most powerful of non-governmental foreign banks called the New York Federal Reserve bank, and considering that Zionists do not generally hire from outside of “the club”, I’d say his resume defines his loyalties quite well.

Disappointingly, I couldn’t find any videos of Mr. Geithner expressing his particular brand of unwavering love for Israel, but I’m sure they are out there…

#6 Robert Gates (Secretary of Defense) – So much for the “change” part of Obama’s Hope and Change campaign… Gates was made 15th Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (a private non-governmental organization) by George Bush Sr. and was heavily involved in the Iran-Contra Affair (a CIA, and not a U.S. government event – Oliver North was working for the CIA in his part as well). Gates was then made Secretary of Defense by the good son: George Bush Jr. in 2006.

And then Obama was apparently told to keep him on as the number 6 man in line for the presidency.

I suppose stranger things have happened…

Of Mr. Gates many corporate ventures, one that should raise eyebrows is his work with VoteHere, “a technology company which sought to provide cryptography and computer software security for the electronic election industry. Following his nomination, a White House spokeswoman said that Gates planned to sell all the stock he owns in individual companies and sever all ties with them if confirmed by the Senate.” This is what one might refer to as an unpresidented conflict of interest, as are all corporate ties which are directly effected by political power, but especially ones related to the voting in of so-called “elected officials”.

And we mustn’t forget his service on the Council On Foreign Relations (CFR) regarding Iran and the “Iraq Study group”…

But he seems so… American! Could Robert Gates really be a Zionist? A supporter of Israel?

“As President Obama has affirmed, the United States’ commitment to Israels’ security is unshakable and our defense relationship is stronger than ever, to the mutual benefit of both nations… Our work together on missile defense technology is ongoing, and the United States will continue to ensure that Israel maintains its qualitative military edge.-Robert Gates, April 27, 2010, C-SPAN.

Can someone explain to me why the United States is “sharing” our secretive missile defenses with Israel. Do we share it with anyone else with such fervor and public ceremony?

And how about the 200 nuclear warheads that Israel holds? Wonder where those came from…?

#7 Eric Holder (Attorney General) – Where to begin with this guy…

(Note: The Israeli/Jewish/Zionist ADL is the most powerful lobby in the world.)

According to the European Union Times: “Eric Holder was the featured speaker at the Anti-Defamation League’s American Heritage Dinner on October 17, 2009, and praised ADL for its historic role in fighting all forms of intolerance and helping make the federal hate crimes law a reality. He called passage of ADL’s hate bill a “marvelous step of progress” and gratefully looks forward to close and continued cooperation with ADL in hate law implementation. ADL recently announced that, having spearheaded passage of The Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Hate Crimes Prevention Act, it will now lead stage two, a massive national campaign to train lawyers to become hate crimes prosecutors. (Note: unconstitutional, and blatant encroachment on states rights).

Holder says that, having been personally frustrated over the past 11 years in his efforts to help pass the hate bill, as Attorney General he is determined to begin immediate enforcement. “. . .the new hate crimes legislation will arrive not a moment too soon. And on the day that it becomes law, we will hasten to begin using it.” (Note: To put people like me in jail for reporting the truth, as stated by Zionists themselves?)

Here are highlights of Holder’s speech – full of praise for ADL – and misrepresentations concerning the new hate law and the alleged “epidemic of hate” it claims to address.

“You – the members of the Anti-Defamation League – and I go way back. I first began convening meetings with members of the ADL in the early 90′s when I served as the United States Attorney in Washington, D.C. . . At that time I expressed my deep appreciation for the fact that you always have served as indispensable allies in some of the most important work our government does. And now, tonight, I once more have the opportunity to stand in solidarity with you, and to thank you for your constant, steadfast work to create a better country. A country free of discrimination; a country free of violence; a country free of hate. The Obama Administration could ask no better partner than the Anti-Defamation League as we jointly strive to attain the ideals of equal opportunity, equal rights, and equal justice for all. Members of the ADL – I salute you.”

Equal rights for all? That’s not what Holder said in testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee this spring. He asserted that the hate bill does not protect Christian ministers, whites, heterosexuals, policemen and members of U.S. military. Only favored groups, he said, such as homosexuals, blacks, Latinos, Jews, Muslims, and women will benefit under this new law:

In Holder’s speech to the ADL he continues this charade, asserting that under America’s new hate law “we will also continue to defend vigilantly the civil rights of all people in this country and prosecute criminal acts discrimination wherever we find them.” “The new law expands the list of protected categories beyond race, color, religion or national origin, and for the first time, allows the federal government to prosecute violence undertaken because of the actual or perceived gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, or disability of any person.”

Holder gives every impression, as ADL did through 19 years of hyping their hate bills to state and federal legislators, that all Americans are protected under hate laws according to “race, color, religion, or national origin.” In reality, ADL never intended any of its hate laws in America – or throughout the world – to protect anyone except those groups ADL considers victims of white, Christian, male, heterosexual civilization.

Holder goes on to note that “the desperate need for a strengthened federal law enforcement capability against hate crimes has been perfectly clear.” Perfectly clear? …What is perfectly clear is that there exists no “desperate need” for federal takeover of local law enforcement.

Further, Holder said that about 7,500 hate crimes a year since 1990, averaging one every hour of the day, “is a staggering figure. . .completely unacceptable.” Actually, out of an average of 11 million crimes annually reported by police to the FBI, alleged hate crimes average only 1/10 of one percent – hardly a level of criminal activity of the epidemic proportion portrayed by Holder and ADL. Less than five percent of these reported hate crimes have ever been established as fact by courts of law, yet Holder says the level of unreported level of hate crimes in America is probably “in the tens of thousands. This fact is enough to make one’s blood run cold.” Fact? How credible is an Attorney General who regards such undocumented speculation as “fact?”

Holder says, “The stubborn persistence of anti-Semitism saddens me” What is anti-Semitism? ADL’s Office of Global Anti-Semitism in the U.S. State Department says “anti-Semitism” means any “strong criticism” of Israel or its leaders, or claims that the Jews had Christ killed. Holder says any such anti-Semitic “hate speech” even as “a casual joke made in private when the speaker thinks no Jewish person is listening,” is very, very bad. It “should scald the conscience of every American.” He also promises that Muslims will be vigorously protected under America’s new hate law, just as they are in Canada, Britain, France and Australia.

Holder concludes with more flattery of ADL: “This organization has a great tradition of refusing to stand by when others are suffering. You are guided by your tenets (racism), your precepts (superiority), and your values (usury) to come to the aid of others who need help. And so, this evening, I humbly call upon you to join me and this new administration in reaching out to all our American neighbors.” (mine)

Note: The ADL and all lobbies are influential, to say the least. But in reality, these lobbies (especially the ADL) are actually writing the bills that are being passed in congress, by the senate, and by the President. This can no longer be called a lobby. It is more like a legislative branch of the government by proxy – unelected, unappointed, and unwanted!

Well… that should be enough for now, I suppose. I doubt the presidency would go to Janet Nepalitano at #18 in line of succession. Though the thought is frightening!

Let’s have a look at a few more Zionist’s though before we go back to pretending it all ain’t so…

The Republican Bush Cabinet – So that you don’t confuse the paradigm of left and right with regards to the power structure of government and the appointed officials under the last republican president, here is a video (you should watch the whole movie) which tells about the at least 32 duel-Israeli citizens appointed by George Bush to his cabinet:

Part 7:

Part 8:

AIPAC – A good documentary program (subtitles) about the most powerful lobby in the United States (which is for a foreign country), the American Israeli Public Affairs Committee. “AIPAC” is the symbol for which Obama makes a large portion of his speeches, as the Israeli flag hangs in the oval office across from the Stars and Stripes.

Part 1:

Part 2:

Part 3:

Part 4:

Part 5:

Part 6: “…because Israel has no other friends in the world.”

On June 5, 2002, at the American Jewish Congress in Philadelphia, Executive Director of its Philadelphia region Joseph Puder stated that, “We are watching the high noon of American Jewish power in the United States, and it’s moving downward. … At the same time we have the influx of a large Muslim community … not like any other community. Every single one of their national organizations with the exception of the Islamic Supreme Council of North America is an Islamist organization.” He concludes, “In the next ten years when the final settlement over the Middle East crisis is going to take place, when the deal is going to be cut about Israel, it’s going to occur at the time of the maximum Muslim immigration, maximum insertion of Muslim political power, and that’s something we’ve got to watch out for.”

Media in Israel – It is striking how similar the invasive, destructive, and disrespectful procedures of the Israeli military are compared to American forces in Iraq and Afghanistan. This is not coincidence, as it is Israel who runs our government and by default, our military. We are Zionist Israels army, the new Red Army.

The agreement between Zionist owned media outlets in America and Israel very seldom let the real plight of the Palestinians at the hands of Israeli soldiers on their news.

And when anything against the status que happens in America, the Zionist owned and controled media in America is there to cover it with completely pro-Zionist, pro-Israel slant.

Here’s a bunch of Jewish Rabbis condemning Israel as an illegitimate state, and condemning Zionism as an Enemy of Jews. Instead of reporting an unbiased and newsworthy story, the media makes these brave men look like crazy outcasts, giving no airtime to explain why they are there:

And hey, here’s one that after reading all this should make you laugh as you cry!

And so I ask you one more time, oh faithful reader and free-thinker… Why does the United States government support Israel so passionately?

Answer: Zionism has complete and total stranglehold on all aspects of government, entertainment, media, banking, inteligence, and corporate structure.

Short Answer: America is Zionist Israel’s bitch!!!

.

–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)

Sunday, August 29, 2010