Republican National Party Is Member Of International Democrat Union (IDU)


In these modern, strong delusional times, it is often hard to see the forest through the trees and to distinguish the lies from reality. Even the principles of law conclude that a lie may be confirmed and ratified as a legal “truth,” that black may be declared as white, left right, and up down. In short, we live in a democracy.

Plato wrote in his 5 regimes that this state of democracy is only the lowest form of humanity before the final step of total tyranny, from which a reset happens as the pure aristocracy reestablishes itself as the cure for democracy and tyranny, the repeating cycle of all the ages. Like the phoenix rising from its own spent ashes, these planned revolutions apparently reestablish the old order as the new order, the bloodlines of the ages appearing in new form and title. Same as the old boss…

But there is something new on the horizon. For we are witnessing global government for the first time in history. It’s not so much that this notion of globalist rule wasn’t already established long ago with such beauties as Unum Sanctum and other bull-shit from the powers of combined church and state that be, it’s that for the first time in history technology has caught up with greed and desire. The combined legacies of so many “leaders” have added up to one big modern orgy of infrastructure and control.

Democracy is politically spouted from all the virtual rooftops of the mass media, that exceedingly transparent controlled opposition of the old and new boss, as the CIA’s large-breasted bluebirds report and sing homage and fealty to that great system of political corruption. It is touted from the halls of legislature and parroted by the multitude of the unaware. And as it turns out, both main political parties are on board the same purposefully sinking ship, desperately and meticulously building a new Atlantis around their own dying model.

But do not be fooled, for this word Atlantis merely means fantasy, its synonyms being delusion, illusion, nightmare, apparition, chimera, mirage, a fool’s paradise, hallucination, fabrication, and of course the impossibility of a man-made utopia.

That only leaves a few things in opposition to such a false creation, and the antonyms to this word Atlantis are indeed simply truth, reality, certainty, actuality, and fact.

Now, the author realizes that the masses of goyim out there as the citizenships of the nations united in such an invention would rather support and live falsely in such a lie as this, a virtual matrix of pure delusion. I have no doubt that this will be the future of the majority. And so I am not here to try and prevent its dissemination as much as I am to document the tools of its creation. For we who will not take the marks and use the biometric identification and suffer the inoculations designed to rid us of our spirituality must be ever vigilant of such evils, such darkness posing as the light.

And so today we shall focus on what this author considers to be one of the most ridiculous customs and rituals that the common people participate in without having the slightest clue as to the origins and intent thereof. That is, of course, the private associations called as the political party system and its control over the electoral process.

But before we expose the communitarian, socialist agendas of both parties as that celebrated “democracy” in action, perhaps we should get a better grasp on the historical point of view of this word. So who likes and who opposes democracy?

–=–

DEMOCRATIC:

“Of or pertaining to democracy, or to a political party called “democratic,” particularly, in the United States, the Democratic party, which succeeded the Anti-federalist, or Republican, party.”

—Black’s Law 4th Edition

–=–

Dictatorship naturally arises out of democracy, and the most aggravated form of tyranny and slavery out of the most extreme liberty.”

—Plato

–=–

A pure democracy is generally a very bad government. It is often the most tyrannical government on earth; for a multitude is often rash, and will not hear reason.”

Noah Webster

–=–

“Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.”

—John Adams

–=–

“Democracy is indispensable to socialism.”

—Vladimir Ilyich Lenin

—=—

“Democracy is the road to socialism.”

Karl Marx

–=–

“To my mind, there is a solution which has to do with democracy, because democratic governments are subject to the will of the people. So, if the people will it, you can actually create international institutions through the democratic states.”

George Soros

–=–

“Democracy is only a dream: it should be put in the same category as Arcadia, Santa Claus, and Heaven.”

–H. L. Mencken

–=–

“The oppressed are allowed once every few years to decide which particular representatives of the oppressing class are to represent and repress them in parliament.”

—Vladimir Ilyich Lenin

—=—

“The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter.”

Winston Churchill

–=–

Our alliances should be understood as a means to expand our influence, not as a constraint on our power. The expansion of democracy and freedom in the world should be a shared interest and value with all nations.”

—Chuck Hagel, 24th United States Secretary of Defense under Obama, Chairperson of the President’s Intelligence Advisory Board

–=–

“Our country’s founders cherished liberty, not democracy.”

—Ron Paul

–=–

“I’ve always had a Marxist understanding of history: democracy is a result of a broad modernization process that happens in every country. Neocons think the use of political power can force the pace of change, but ultimately it depends on societies doing it themselves.”

—Francis Fukuyama

–=–

“Sometimes democracy must be bathed in blood.”

—Augusto Pinochet, president of Chile

–=–

“Democracy consists of choosing your dictators, after they’ve told you what you think it is you want to hear.”

—Alan Coren

–=–

“Democracy means government by discussion, but it is only effective if you can stop people talking.”

—Clement Attlee

–=–

“The flood of money that gushes into politics today is a pollution of democracy.”

—Theodore White

–=–

The President will lead in the treason. Your militia will leave you and fight against you… When evil men take office the whole gang will be in collusionThey will keep the people in utter ignorance and steal their liberty by ambuscade. When Government removes your armaments, you will have no power, but government will have all power.” 

—Patrick Henry

–=–

“The ignorance of one voter in a democracy impairs the security of all.”

—John F. Kennedy

–=–

“Democracy needs support, and the best support for democracy comes from other democracies.”

—Benazir Bhutto

–=–

Perhaps the greatest flaw in this concept of government in general, be it of kings or representatives, is the mistaken identity of its members. To assume the incorruptible nature of any man is the folly of all others. And in this lowest form of government called democracy, such an assumption would only lead to exactly what we see in government today. For behind the banner of democracy lies always the worst possible cheats, pirates, and thieves. And under that subjective banner lies only illiteracy and ignorance, the masses of they who actually vote for their tyrants while choosing to believe they are saviors.

To turn the entire world into individual democracies is the number one goal of the modern tyrant. For only in the ignorance of the masses may democracy may take hold, thrive, and destroy itself. From this subversion the tyrant thrives, the old system dies, and the new order begins. This rebirth process is well under way in most nations. And of course war will transpire in those whose people choose knowledge over the necessary ignorance of democratic public-mindedness, for war is merely the clearing of obstacles in a globally sanctioned international commerce of nations, utterly controlled by one united front ratified by those same tyrants promoting democracy now and central, globalist rule later.

–=–

“Democracy still has a real hope and chance in Iraq, and true freedom in this country would be the greatest testament to those who gave their lives for it.”

—Mary Landrieu

–=–

Nothing is more ridiculous than this political notion of killing millions and causing mass starvation, suffering, and destruction of infrastructure with only the somehow innocent and patriotically perceived design to spread freedom and democracy. This attitude that many millions or billions must die so that democracy can live is ludicrous at worse, paradoxical at best. But then, what else would one expect from these creators of a New Atlantis?

What really is this militarized, psychological warfare effort to spread democracy to the world? Why the need to cause democratic elections?

The answer is simple really… volunteerism, or at least the appearance of a voluntary society. You see, this term “volunteerism” goes by a different name in law, that being the doctrine of master and servant. When a commonality of people are all given “equality” to vote for their tyrants, the title of those tyrants is officially merely professed as legitimately elected “politicians.” Thus the voting process is the creator of mutualistic consent as mob rule. The minority assumes the majority will; the majority always being the most weak and susceptible to illusion and predictive programming. This is called as democracy, where a bunch of fools (a legal term meaning those not in right mind or in Latin non compos mentis) believe they each have a voice, when in reality their votes are counted as only one voice from one body. And those who choose not to decide between their tyrants in that democratic system of voting still have made a choice, that choice being assent to the majority will. It’s a no win situation, regardless of how we individually vote. For it is not the results of the vote that matter, only the volunteerism that causes legitimacy of the whole illusionary process. The act, not the result, is what makes tyrants become as legitimate in the minds of the masses.

Obviously both political parties and all third parties must include themselves in this democratic process. And so we can state with self-evident absoluteness that all parties must support democracy. The Lenin and Marx quotes above certainly help us to understand the origins and necessity of democracy as the gateway to all other systems, be they socialism, communism, or that great combination of all isms called and promoted as communitarianism. The reader would be shocked to learn that most “politicians” out there are grand supporters of this modern plan of communitarianism. And I invite the reader to research this on his or her own. A good source is here:

LINK–> http://web.archive.org/web/20080621055453/http://nord.twu.net/acl/evolution.html

Note: Please support Niki Raapana in her works. (http://nikiraapana.blogspot.com)

Now let us examine this collusion of the Republican National Party of the United States with the International Democrat Union (IDU), supporting so many other socialist and communitarian constructs around the world.

–=–

IDU Mission:

“Being committed to advancing the social and
political values on which democratic societies are founded,
including the basic personal freedoms and human rights,
as defined in the (UN) Universal Declaration of Human Rights….”

–IDU founding Declaration of Principles, second Paragraph

–=–

Yep. You read the title of this blog-post correctly. As it turns out, the political party game is one giant United Nations, Agenda 21 fraud.

Yes, the Republican Party of the United States is actually a member of the International Democrat Union (IDU), which above all else promotes the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights over the supposed sovereignty of the United States constitution – and over that of any other member party’s (nation’s) constitutional charter as well! This is essential for global governance.

In an article written by Tom Deweese (American Policy Center) and posted on the Gunowners of America website, the IDU is succinctly unveiled:

“The root of the IDU’s political agenda is Fabian Socialism which wants to blur national borders and cultures, eliminate private property and individual liberty in favor of the common good. The Fabians consider themselves to be a ruling elite that knows better than individuals how to run our lives. Their way is: Heads, government wins. Tails, citizens lose. It is the worst form of tyranny. And this is the root of the IDU, and by association, apparently the Republican Party. That answers a lot of questions about recent Republican policy decisions…”

Link–> http://gunowners.org/op0542.htm

–=–

As it is so very easy to confuse the intentions of these international bodies with that of individual peoples of sovereign states, we must make this very important distinction between the United Nations and the individual but no longer seperate Nations that subscribe to it.

From the American Policy Institute in 2009, again by Mr. Tom Deweese, we read:

New GOP Chairman should remove Party from the International Democrat Union…

“As an example of how this second system works in practice, The Constitution of the old Soviet Union said that Soviet citizens had most of the same rights as Americans. Except that it also said individual rights were secondary to the common good. In the case of the Soviet Union, the common good was defined as creating a worldwide communist utopia where individual wants and needs simply didn’t count. We all know how that worked out for the Soviet citizens.

While veiled in language designed to sound much like the Declaration of Independence, the UN’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights actually takes this second approach, outlining specific rights it says we should all have. It says nothing of “unalienable” rights, instead referring to “rights under the law.” Who or what is the law, according to the Human Rights Declaration? It says, “the will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government.” Now, at first look, that sounds like America. Democracy. People voting – the opposite of dictatorship. But such a concept ignores the very root of American freedom – that our rights are guaranteed, no matter what the majority thinks or wants. Moreover, Article 29, Section 3 of the Declaration says “These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.” So much for “unalienable” rights.”

LINK–> http://americanpolicy.org/2009/01/08/new-gop-chairman-should-remove-party-from-the-international-democrat-union-3/

–=–

Of course those unalienable rights spoken of in the declaration of independence had nothing to do with public 14th amendment citizens of the United States, but only actually protected those private men who reserved all rights from the United States. The American Policy Institute will never tell the common citizenship this of course (or simply does not know). Often the parrots of policy know nothing of the words they speak, led by the beak to support and make falsely patriotic what should be abandoned and utterly destroyed, such as the existence and purpose of these controlling and corrupting political parties.

We must learn to recognize the difference between blood and fiction, between man untainted by political, public status and he who avoids such marks, names, and numbers in privacy. Citizenship is, of course, an alienation upon privacy. Thus the United Nations and its declarations only apply to the public citizenships of each nation, which are only the common, registered goyim (general people) and the commercial laws pertaining to us. The private men of each private (several) State will not be subject to such national rule, for they are the creators of nations. Gods. A “State” is nothing more than a Private bloodline of “People.” And it is these tyrants that create the democratic nations and the law of nations for their own protection against that mass of illiterates we call nationally as the public. In short, the United Nations is the uniting in commerce and law of all slave colonies called as nations. Colony means only farm or plantation. And global governance will only apply to those born in the nations; those birthed and certified in attainder or legal “corruption of blood” under a commercial, legal system of alienation.

It is certainly true that those who falsely believe they are free are the most hopelessly enslaved. And democracy is certainly the best tool for the propagation of such a false dialectic.

In the history section of the about tab from the IDU.org website we read:

“The International Democrat Union (IDU) is a working association of over 80 Conservative, Christian Democrat and like-minded political parties of the centre and centre right.

Formed in 1983, the IDU provides a forum in which Parties holding similar beliefs can come together and exchange views on matters of policy and organisational interest, so that they can learn from each other, act together, establish contacts and speak with one strong voice to promote democracy and centre-right policies around the globe. FOUNDER MEMBERS of the IDU included Britain’s Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, then US Vice-President George Bush Sr, Paris Mayor and later President of France Jacques Chirac, German Chancellor Helmut Kohl and many other Party Leaders.

Our Mission

I. The International Democrat Union (IDU) shall consist of Member Parties of the Asia Pacific Democrat Union (APDU); the Caribbean Democrat Union (CDU); the Democrat Union of Africa; the European Democrat Union (EDU); the European People’s Party (EPP); the Alliance of European Conservatives and Reformists (AECR); and the Union of Latin American Parties (UPLA), which have adhered to the IDU Declaration of Principles.

II. The IDU will foster the common philosophy of its Member Parties, establish permanent relations at a bilateral and multilateral level, encourage mutual support and to these ends will provide a forum for the exchange of views and information on matters of interest to all or a considerable number of its Member Parties.

Countries can only develop their full potential if they develop recognising the ideals of liberal democracy, freedom of the individual, and the need for economic growth to be based on individual initiative and free, competitive enterprise economies. The IDU has a clear role in a modern world, where today’s idea in one country is tomorrow’s policy in another.

Through the IDU, member Parties can exchange policy ideas, assist each other to win the political argument, and to win elections. There are regular meetings of both the full IDU and its Regional Unions and Organisations. The officers of the IDU are elected at Party Leaders’ Meetings which are held every three or four years.

At IDU Executive Meetings, briefings are given on local and topical issues, as well as consideration given to applicant parties. Apart from Executive Meetings and meetings of IDU’s Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, the IDU holds events such as the Young Leaders Forum, plus undertakes fact-finding missions and election observation. A major event is also held every four years to coincide with the Republican Convention, the last one held in September 2012 in Tampa (Florida).

The IDU also organises campaigning seminars for politicians and party workers. These involve exchanges of information on campaign technology, fund-raising techniques, opinion polling, advertising and campaign organisation. The IDU plays an essential role in enabling like-minded, centre-right parties to share experiences in order to achieve electoral success.”

Under the history tab we read:

“19 dignitaries attended the meeting that established the IDU held at the Hotel Intercontinental n London on 24th June 1983: Dr Alois Mock (Osterreichische Volkspartei, Austria); Prime-Minister Margaret Thatcher (Conservative Party, Great Britain); Federal Chancellor Helmut Kohl (CDU, Federal Republic of Germany); Prime-Minister Franz-Josef Strauss (CSU, Federal Republic of Germany); M Jacques Chirac (Rassemblement Pour la Republique, France); Mr Andrew Peacock (Liberal Party, Australia); M Evangelos Averoff-Tossizza (Nea Demokratia, Greece); Sr Fraga Iribarne (Alianza Popular, Spain); Sr Oscar Alzaga, (Partido Democrata Popular, Spain); Mrs Susanne Wood, National Party, New Zealand); President Glafcos Clerides (Democratic Rally, Cyprus); Mr Ilkka Suominen (Kansallinen Kokoomus, Finland); Sr Lucas Pires (CDS, Portugal); Mr Tatsuo Tanaka (Liberal Democrat Party, Japan); Mr Ulf Adelsohn (Moderata Samlingspartiet, Sweden); Mr Erik Nielsen (Progressive Conservative Party, Canada); Prime-Minister Poul Schluter (Det Konservative Folkeparti, Denmark); Mr Jo Benkow (Hoyre, Norway); and Mr Frank Fahrenkopf (Republican National Committee, USA).

In addition the US Vice-President George Bush and Norwegian Prime-Minister Kare Willoch (IDU’s second Chairman, from 1987 to 1989) were present and both spoke at the founding meetingClick here for the minutes of the founding meeting and Declaration of Principles in PDF format.

The IDU officers elected were: Chairman: Dr Alois Mock (Osterreichische Volkspartei, Austria); Vice-Chairmen: Ulf Adelsohn (Moderata Samlingspartiet, Sweden); Richard Allen (Republican National Committee, USA); Jacques Chirac (Rassemblement Pour la Republique, France); Cecil Parkinson (Conservative Party, Great Britain); Sir John Atwill (Liberal Party, Australia); and Prime-Minister Franz-Josef Strauss (CSU, Federal Republic of Germany), in addition to Treasurer: Allan Lawrence (Progressive Conservative Party, Canada) and Executive Secretary: Scott Hamilton (Conservative Party, Great Britain).

–=–

That’s right folks, the self-labeled “Conservative” Republican Party of the United States has partnered with such other national political parties as the Liberal Democrat Party of Japan, the Liberal Party of Australia, the Democratic Rally of Cyprus, and who could forget those supposed tyrannical redcoats of the Conservative Party of Great Britain?

THE CHAIRMAN:

Thank you very much Mr Vice-President, and I am particularly grateful to you coming to London and conferring additional reputation to our meeting by your presence. May I now ask Mr Fahrenkopf to take the floor.”

MR FRANK FAHRENKDPF:

“>Chairman, Republican National CommitteeU.S.A .]

“Mr Chairman, my colleagues, it is with a great deal of pride and pleasure that I as Chairman of the Republican Party of the United States join Vice-President Bush in commemorating the historic creation of IDU here in London today.

A year and a half ago I attended an EDU meeting in Munichat which the seed of the Pacific Democrat Union and the International Democrat Union was sown. Last July, in Tokyo, the PDU was formed; and last week, in Honolulu, I had the great pleasure to host the PDU’s first annual council meeting. Today, we reap the remaining harvest of that Munich meeting with the birth of the IDUOn behalf of the Republican Partylet me assure my colleagues of our full cooperation and participation in the IDU – and in seeking our mutual goals of promoting democracy, freedom, self-determination and, most important, peace in the world.”

THE CHAIRMAN:

Thank you Mr Fahrenkopf.

May I now ask the Norwegian Prime-Minister to take the floor.”

—Minutes of the IDU founding meeting and Declaration of Principles

–=–

Even as the Pope calls for the same system of worldwide “peace and safety” through United Nations programs and one world religion, we are warned repeatedly that these artful terms are merely the lies of tyrants.

–=–

For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape… 

1 Thessalonians 5:3 KJB

–=–

And in the latter time of their kingdom, when the transgressors are come to the full, a king of fierce countenance, and understanding dark sentences, shall stand up. And his power shall be mighty, but not by his own power: and he shall destroy wonderfully, and shall prosper, and practise, and shall destroy the mighty and the holy people. And through his policy also he shall cause craft to prosper in his hand; and he shall magnify himself in his heart, and by peace shall destroy many: he shall also stand up against the Prince of princes; but he shall be broken without hand.”

—Daniel 8: 23-25, KJB

–=–

“Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.”

—Mathew 7: 15, KJB

—=—

“Now, it is true that the nature of society is to create, among its citizens, an illusion of safety; but it is also absolutely true that the safety is always necessarily an illusion. Artists are here to disturb the peace.”

—James Baldwin, ‘An interview with James Baldwin’ (1961)

—=—

“As distrust, in some sense, is the mother of safety, so security is the gate of danger. A man had need to fear this most of all, that he fears not at all.”

—Thomas Brooks, citation in Josiah Hotchkiss Gilbert’s, ‘Dictionary of Burning Words of Brilliant Writers,’ p. 532 (1895).

—=—

20 bucks says the reader has no idea what the word “danger” means in its etymology.

–=–

DANGERnoun – mid-13c., “power of a lord or master, jurisdiction,” from Anglo-French daunger, Old French dangier “power, power to harm, mastery, authority, control” (12c., Modern French danger), alteration (due to assoc. with damnum) of dongier, from Vulgar Latin *dominarium “power of a lord,” from Latin dominuslord, master” (see domain). Modern sense of “risk, peril” (from being in the control of someone or something else) evolved first in French and was in English late 14c. Replaced Old English pleoh; in early Middle English this sense is found in peril.

LINK–>http://etymonline.com/index.php?allowed_in_frame=0&search=danger

–=–

The United States, the nation, is the creation of a danger, also called as a district. And citizen-ships are of course on a commercial voyage in peril, requiring licensure and insurance on their surname. This scratch of the surface will be expounded upon intricately in my upcoming book, a private work currently in editing and due out very soon, free to all who seek such forbidden knowledge.

It is strange that no one seems to question the fact that Abraham Lincoln, as he who caused what can only be compared to the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia that killed so many millions, was the first Republican party president. And suddenly, a civil war? Suddenly, the first tyrannical executive order against brother and sister, mother and father. Suddenly, lawlessness according to the law of necessity in war. Suddenly, reconstruction of the constitution and government, including the 14th amendment that enslaved all commoners under a slave-state based on equality, but never equity?

No one seems to question that the later and 2nd president Roosevelt, whom days after his election caused congress to declare his and all future president’s virtual dictatorship through permanent national emergency status, was of this Democratic platform, though his previous presidential namesake was certainly of that “Grand Old Party.”  For those unfamiliar with these histories of the American presidency and the dictatorship spoken of, please see my articles entitled “Cracking The Cult Of The Constitution,” parts 1 & 2, or Volume II of my upcoming book series.

“Two distantly related branches of the family from Oyster Bay on Long Island and Hyde Park in Dutchess CountyUpstate New York achieved national political prominence with the elections of (republican) Presidents Theodore Roosevelt (1901–1909) and his fifth cousin (democratFranklin Delano Roosevelt (1933–1945), whose wife, First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt, was Theodore’s niece.”

–Wikipedia entry for Roosevelt family

–=–

But where exactly does this leave us as compared to the already so-named competition?What about the other United States “Democratic” Party?

–=–

“Note that the Political Party today known as the “Democratic Party” was
initially established as theRepublican Party.” The Jeffersonian party
members were labeled “Democratic” by opposition Federalists –
an attempt to stigmatize them as purveyors of democracy or mob rule.
By the Jacksonian era, the term “The Democracy” was in use by the party;
the name “Democratic Party” was eventually settled upon and
became the official name in 1844.”

–Thomas Jefferson, by Joyce Appleby, Encyclopedia Britannica

–=–

One would be hard-pressed to describe the National Democratic Party of America as anything but a promoter of it’s own brand of the similitude of neoliberal, communitarian socialism promoted by its mainstream counterpart. And certainly the antics of this current president need to be discussed as to their source.

For instance, the Chicago Democratic Socialists of America stated in true communitarian spirit the following in its report entitled “New Ground 45” in 1996:

March – April, 1996

A Town Meeting on Economic Insecurity: Employment and Survival in Urban America

By Bob Roman

Over three hundred people attended the first of two Town Meetings on Economic Insecurity on February 25 in Ida Noyes Hall at the University of Chicago. Entitled “Employment and Survival in Urban America,” the meeting was sponsored by the UofC DSA Youth Section, Chicago DSA and University Democrats. The panelists were Toni Preckwinkle, Alderman of Chicago’s 4th Ward; Barack Obama, candidate for the 13th Illinois Senate District; Professor William Julius Wilson, Center for the Study of Urban Inequality at the University of Chicago; Professor Michael Dawson, University of Chicago; and Professor Joseph Schwartz, Temple University and a member of DSA’s National Political Committee…

One of the themes that has emerged in Barack Obama’s campaign iswhat does it take to create productive communities,” not just consumptive communities. It is an issue that joins some of the best instincts of the conservatives with the better instincts of the left. He felt the state government has three constructive roles to play.

The first ishuman capital development.” By this he meant public education (think Common Core), welfare reform (Think Obama-Care), and a “workforce preparation strategy” (more Common Core). Public education requires equality in funding. It’s not that money is the only solution to public education’s problems but it’s a start toward a solution. The current proposals for welfare reform are intended to eliminate welfare but it’s also true that the status quo is not tenable. A true welfare system would provide for medical care, child care and job training (i.e. Common Core and Obama-care). While Barack Obama did not use this term, it sounded very much like the “social wage” approach used by many social democratic labor parties. By “workforce preparation strategy,” Barack Obama simply meant a coordinated, purposeful program of job training instead of the ad hoc, fragmented approach used by the State of Illinois today.

The state government can also play a role in (wealth) redistribution, the allocation of wages and jobs. As Barack Obama noted, when someone gets paid $10 million to eliminate 4,000 jobs, the voters in his district know this is an issue of power not economics. The government can use as tools labor law reform, public works and contracts

Link–> http://www.chicagodsa.org/ngarchive/ng45.html

–=–

Not only was Barack Obama an honored attendee and speaker for the socialist party of Chicago, in September 1995 he was a contracted publicist for the Marxist “New Party”.

“About 50 activists attended the Chicago New Party membership meeting in July. The purpose of the meeting was to update members on local activities and to hear appeals for NP support from four potential political candidates. The NP is being very active in organization building and politics. There are 300 members in Chicago. In order to build an organizational and financial base the NP is sponsoring house parties. Locally it has been successful both fiscally and in building a grassroots base. Nationwide it has resulted in 1000 people committed to monthly contributions. The NP’s political strategy is to support progressive candidates in elections only if they have a concrete chance to “win”. This has resulted in a winning ratio of 77 of 110 elections. Candidates must be approved via a NP political committee. Once approved, CANDIDATES MUST SIGN A CONTRACT WITH THE NP. The contract mandates that THEY MUST HAVE A VISIBLE AND ACTIVE RELATIONSHIP WITH THE NP.

The political entourage included Alderman Michael Chandler, William Delgado, chief of staff for State Rep Miguel del Valle, and spokespersons for State Sen. Alice Palmer, Sonya Sanchez, chief of staff for State Sen. Jesse Garcia, who is running for State Rep in Garcia’s District; and Barack Obama…”

Link–> http://www.chicagodsa.org/ngarchive/ng42.ht

–=–

Perhaps the most amazing cognitive disassociation and dissonance of the American people is the fact that “democracy” and the spread of it actually means that the people do not elect their own president/head of state.

The member nations/states of the International Democrat Union, including the United States, are almost exclusively nations/states where the president/head of state is elected through parliament or electoral college. In other words, in most of these “democratic” nations/states, the head of state is an INDIRECT ELECTION, NOT BY THE COMMON, VOTING PEOPLE.

For instance, the following nations have indirect elections for president, either as a monarchy, by election of legislature or by electoral college, orby some other committee or parliament, as opposed to that supposedly communist China, where the common people actually directly vote for their president:

Albania
Australia
Belgium –
Canada
Peoples Republic of China –
Denmark
Estonia
Ethiopia –
Germany
Greece
Hong Kong –
Hungary
India –
Iraq –
Israel –
Italy –
Jamaica –
Japan –
Kosovo –
Kuwait –
Lous –
Lebenon –
Libya –
Luxemburg –
Morocco –
Nepal –
Netherlands –
New Zealand
Norway
Pakistan –
Saudi Arabia –
South Africa –
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland –
Syria –
Thailand –
United Arab Emirates –
United Kingdom
United States
Vatican City –

Complete list here –> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elections_by_country

–=–

In contrast, when we view the nations or states that do have direct elections, with few exceptions they are generally considered as “third world” counties. It is not that they are, just that the self-proclaimed first-worlders call them as such. Ireland and Iran for instance hold direct elections, two very isolationist countries that do not cooperate with the monarchical or electoral systems and wish to preserve their culture and religious heritage. The same cannot be said of America, a people that seem to have no idea that their vote is purely a political pole, a popularity contest, and not the actual vote for a president. We do not vote for the best man, only for the best fictional party member, 1984 style.

I have presented here many threads to follow for the reader. At the time of this posting the IDU.org website is conveniently and temporarily not in service. And so I hope this collection of information will be a foundation for your own future research and sharing with others so brainwashed by this illegitimate system.

Will it stop you from voting? Who cares? The result is always the same with or without your individual vote, and not enough common goyim will see this to matter. I speak now only to the remnant, to those desiring to be unenfranchised from their false, political freedom.

DOM – Used as a termination, denotes jurisdiction, or property and jurisdiction; primarily, doom, judgment; as in kingdom, earldom. Hence it is used to denote state, condition or quality, as in wisdom, freedom. (Webster’s 1828)

FREEnoun –  [Hebrew. See Frank.] 1. Being at liberty; not being under necessity or restraint, physical or moral; a word of general application to the body, the will or mind, and to corporations. 2. In government, not enslaved; not in a state of vassalage or dependence; subject only to fixed laws, made by consent, and to a regular administration of such laws; not subject to the arbitrary will of a sovereign or lord; as a free state, nation or people. 3. Instituted by a free people, or by consent or choice of those who are to be subjects, and securing private rights and privileges by fixed laws and principles; not arbitrary or despotic; as a free constitution or government. There can be no free government without a democratical branch in the constitution. 4. Not imprisoned, confined or under arrest; as, the prisoner is set free. 5. Unconstrained; unrestrained; not under compulsion or control. A man is free to pursue his own choice; he enjoys free will. 6. Permitted; allowed; open; not appropriated; as, places of honor and confidence are free to all; we seldom hear of a commerce perfectly free. (Webs1828)

FREEDOMnoun – 1. A state of exemption from the power or control of another; liberty; exemption from slavery, servitude or confinement. Freedom is personal, civil, political, and religious. [See Liberty.] 2. Particular privileges; franchise; immunity; as the freedom of a city. 3. Power of enjoying franchises. 4. Exemption from fate, necessity, or any constraint in consequence of predetermination or otherwise; as the freedom of the will. 5. Any exemption from constraint or control. 6. Ease or facility of doing any thing. He speaks or acts with freedom. 7. Frankness; boldness. He addressed his audience with freedom. 8. License; improper familiarity; violation of the rules of decorum; with a plural. Beware of what are called innocent freedoms. (Webster’s 1828)

FREEDOMLiberty; the right to do what is not forbidden by law. Freedom does not preclude the idea of subjection to law; indeed, it presupposes the existence of some legislative provision, the observance of which insures freedom to us, by securing the like observance from others. (Bouvier’s 1856)

ENFRANCHISETo make free; to incorporate a man in a society or body politic.(Black’s 4th)

ENFRANCHISEMENTThe act of making free; giving a franchise or freedom to; investiture with privileges or capacities of freedom, or municipal or political liberty. Admission to the freedom of a city; admission to political rights, and particularly the right of suffrage. Anciently, the acquisition of freedom by a villein from his lord. The word is now used principally either of the manumission of slaves, of giving to a borough or other constituency a right to return a member or members to parliament, or of the conversion of copyhold into freehold. (Black’s 4th)

ENFRANCHISEMENT nounRelease from slavery or custody. 1. The admission of persons to the freedom of a corporation or state; investiture with the privileges of free citizens; the incorporating of a person into any society or body politic. (Webs1828)

–=–

“In a popular sense, the political rights of subjects and citizens are franchises, such as the right of suffrage.”

–Black’s Law 2nd Edition, definition of franchise

–=–

This idea of liberty and freedom is taken so completely out of context to the average “citizenship” in public-mindedness that the notion that we live in a voluntary society where servants choose their masters as the doctrines of law is completely lost. We do not realize that it is our own unrestrained freedoms (liberties) as franchises of the state that actually cause us to be slaves to it. For a citizen-ship is like a rental care, a legal status that is bound to all legal laws of persons. And so the freedom (franchise) enjoyed, including the right to suffer from our own choices, also called suffrage or voting, is the very nature of the slavery system called politically (artificially) as liberty. Yet again, we are taking what is false, what is created only in the Atlantean jurisdiction, and pretending it to be a reality.

And so if one and only one thing is learned by the reader of this article it must be this: that the powers that be exist and subsist only because we suffer (vote) for them to do just that. In other words, we can only blame ourselves for voting for the better of two evils. No one is forcing our hand. No one is forcing our participation in the franchise of citizenship. We put ourselves into the path and ad-venture of the danger of another. We consent through our actions and inaction, and by doing so allow the worst of the worst element of the human equation to cheat, steal, and pirate everything we need even while it allows us the franchise to use what we want. After all, we voted for everything we complain about and deserve everything we are handed. Until we admit defeat, we cannot and will not find natural freedom, only the false appearance of nature as a political art from called franchise.

In the end, which is by the way right now, we need not fear the threat of globalism for it is already here. To fear deceit when it is already upon us is foolishness. Fear of it is truly irrelevant at this stage of a very ancient game of pledging. The only consideration we must individually make is wether to participate in it or not, whether to voluntarily carry its enfranchised mark, surname, and number or not, and ultimately whether we are willing to be persecuted, imprisoned, and killed for daring to have, and more importantly act upon, the Highest knowledge of self-evident Truth.

Remember, you are voting for a party, not a man. The party has no power without the person you vote (or don’t vote) for and thus give legitimacy to. Whether we give willingly our choice or refrain and offer no choice at all, either action is an expression of consent. Not tacit, expressive.

We must choose our Master. Reality or Atlantis. It’s that simple.

Until then, enjoy the big legal lie…

.

–Clint Richardson (Realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Thursday, April 28th, 2016

Advertisements

A Pictorial History Of The World’s Governments


Due to the overwhelming popularity of A Pictorial History Of The United States Government (LINK) I thought it prudent to present a pictorial and historical escapade into the infection of the rest of the world by this tiny but powerful bloodline minority. For until we can see, all of our cultures and heritages shall continue to be perverted and uniformly eroded as planned and foretold for centuries.

Please note that this more advanced essay is an integral part to the comprehension of my upcoming multi-part series on the founding of the United States and its Constitution – the Masonic origins of America – and why the fervent desire to build and support Israel (Zionsim) at all costs is so prevalent in our collective set of world leaders. Today’s presentation includes photos, quotes, and my own commentary to help put the puzzle pieces of the past together in their proper historical perspective so as to understand the collective disposition of the unorganized masses of people of the world under this unified international foe.

In the end, after weeks of careful assembly, you will certainly realize an undeniable and inconvenient truth about our world, who promotes war and pestilence for profit, and what controls most nations.

This time from A to Z: 100 pictures are indeed worth 10,000 words…

–=–

File:WJC meeting with Argentine President Cristina Kirchner.jpg
Argentina – World Jewish Congress leaders meet with Argentine
President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner in Buenos Aires, June 2008


Australia – Prime Minister Julia Gillard


President Heydar Alyev


Belgium – Prime Minister Yves Leterme
receives a compass called the ‘Navigator of Jerusalem’,
from European Jewish Congress President Moshe Kantor

File:Interreligious-Meeting - Mustafa Ceric - Herman Van-Rompuy-Marc-Schneier - Abdujalil Sajid - Brussels 2010.jpg
– Bosnia –
First Gathering of European Muslim and Jewish leaders in Brussels, December 2010 –
Grand Mufti Mustafa Ceric – European Council President Herman Van-Rompuy –
Rabbi Marc-Schneier – Imam Dr. Abdujalil Sajid


Brazil – President Lula (Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva)


Brazil – President Lula (Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva)
at the “holocaust” centre Yad Vashem, Israel


Brazil – (above) President Lula with Chabad members
(below) blowing the Ram’s Horn

https://i0.wp.com/w3.chabad.org/media/images/483/Xlgv4834050.jpg
Brazil –  first female president Dilma Rousseff, before the election


Canada – Prime Minister Stephen Harper


Canada – Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird, at Kfar Chabad


Canada – Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird

Photo: Thank you to everyone who came out tonight to the Jewish Heritage Month reception at Queen's Park!
Canada – MPP Mike Colle hosting Jewish Heritage Month at Queen’s Park –
OJA (Ontario Jewish Archives) of UJA- (United Jewish Appeal)


MPP Monte Kwinter, MPP Peter Shurman, MPP Mike Colle,
Councillor James Pasternak – at Lipa Green Centre for UJA


Councillor James Pasternak, Associate Director, Ontario Government Relations
At the Lipa Green Centre – The Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs (CIJA)

Infection on all levels…


Regional Councillor Rosati, Councillor Sheffman, Mayor Maurizio Bevilacqua,
Councillor DeFrancesca and Regional Councillor Michael DiBiase
Ontario Jewish Heritage Month — at Lipa Green Centre.


United Jewish Appeal campaign booklet, 1947,
For: “restoration of Palestine” and “resettlement in Canada”

https://i2.wp.com/www.loc.gov/exhibits/haventohome/images/hh0165s.jpg
United Jewish Appeal
Propaganda for support of refugee Jews in Europe and Palestine

Photo: Happy Victoria Day! We hope you are enjoying the long weekend. Although the OJA does not have any photographs of Queen Victoria, we have the next best thing: a photo of her great great granddaughter Queen Elizabeth II. Queen Elizabeth was in town for the dedication of the Mount Sinai Hospital in 1973.</p> <p>Monty Simmonds, Q.C., with Her Majesty the Queen Elizabeth II, Prince Philip and Bert Gerstein on the dedication of Mount Sinai Hospital, 600 University Ave., Toronto, 1973, OJA, photo #3675.
Queen Elizabeth II, Prince Philip, Monty Simmonds, Q.C, and Bert Gerstein
dedication of Mount Sinai Hospital, 600 University Ave., Toronto, Canada, 1973
–Ontario Jewish Archives (OJA), photo #3675.


Montreal, Canada – Mayor Michael Applebaum

“I am going to put my energies into my defense and into my family,”
Applebaum, who insists he is innocent, said.
“This is why I am resigning as mayor of Montreal –
it is the responsible thing to do,” he stressed.

Applebaum’s platform as Mayor was a promise to
“clean up Montreal’s culture of corruption”.

Not so ironically, this Jewish politician was recently charged with corruption in office!

–=–


Costa Rica – President Oscar Arias in Israel


Denmark – former Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen
(here as Secretary General of NATO)
with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu

–=–
The Crown Temple
And The United Kingdom Of Jerusalem
–=–

http://www.jpost.com/HttpHandlers/ShowImage.ashx?ID=10089
Great Britain – Queen Elizabeth

https://i2.wp.com/w3.chabad.org/media/images/354/NcRD3541928.jpg
Great Britain – Queen Elizabeth
This was the one person she knew not to shake hands with


Great Britain – Queen Elizabeth

Britain's Ambassador to Israel Matthew Gould and President Shimon Peres toast Queen Elizabeth II at an event marking her Diamond Jubilee (photo credit: Roni Schutzer/Flash90)
Britain’s Ambassador to Israel Matthew Gould with President Shimon Peres
toasting Queen Elizabeth II on her Diamond Jubilee…

“(the) president is one of few people who can match the monarch in uniting people”

–=–

Video: Queen Elizabeth II knights Israel President Shimon Peres

–=–

http://i1.wp.com/www.loonwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/prince_charles_yarmulke.jpg?resize=183%2C250
Prince Charles of Wales, regent to the British crown


Prince Charles of Wales


Winston Churchill with Bernard Baruch, the leader of Israel, in 1961.
–Library of Congress


“The late Prime Minister’s bronze image now looks out from the
Montefiore Gardens over the Tower of David to Jerusalem’s Old City,
which he first visited in 1921 with Lawrence of Arabia.”

Nir Barkat, Mayor of Jerusalem claimed the Second World War leader
as a champion for Jerusalem and Israel at the ceremony,
which was attended by Randolph Churchill, the prime minister’s
great grandson, and British Ambassador Mathew Gould.”

–=–

“During times like these, when the free world is faced with the threat of a nuclear
Iran and global terrorism, it is important to preserve Churchill’s legacy, having
led the world to victory against the Nazi tyrant, in Jerusalem,
the city of peace of freedom…”

–Isaac Herzog, a Labor MK who led the statue’s installation to Israel Hayom.

(Never mind that Israel is one of only three nuclear armed nations that
refused to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, for which Iran did sign)

–=–


Great Britain (U.K.) Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher
“The first British PM to visit Israel while in office”
In Israel with Golda Meir during her visit to Israel in 1976


Margaret Thatcher with Israel President Shimon Peres


Margaret Thatcher and Israeli President Yitzhak Shamir


With Israeli Minister of Industry and Trade Ariel Sharon in Jerusalem, May 1986


With Netanyahu


Thatcher with Menachem Begen

–=–
Death Of The Iron Lady
–=–

Excerpt from Israel’s Technion website (http://pard.technion.ac.il/technion-honors-baroness-margaret-thatcher/):

It is with sadness that the Technion – Israel Institute of Technology heard of the passing away of Britain’s former Prime Minister Baroness Margaret Thatcher. Thatcher was a keen friend and supporter of the Technion and had a sharp insight into the importance of the institute for the region and the world.

On Nov. 2nd 1989, Prime Minister Thatcher received an Honorary Doctorate from Technion President Dr Max Reis “in recognition of her life-long involvement in and passion for science and technology; her exceptional statesmanship in British and world affairs; and in gratitude for her friendship to the State of Israel.” The ceremony took place in Whitehall.

The proceeds of the function made possible the Margaret Thatcher Centre for Computational Chemistry

Below is the acceptance speech of Baroness Thatcher.

Sir Evelyn, Mr. Galil, [Immanuel Jakobovits] Chief Rabbi, your excellency, my lords, ladies and gentlemen.

Thank you for the very great honour you do me, — first by making me an honorary doctor of technical sciences of the Technion university and, — second, by naming the centre for computational chemistry at the university after me…

https://i0.wp.com/pard.technion.ac.il/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/thatcherwear.jpg

De Beers is the Jewish Zionist  Rothschild funded mining empire of Cecil Rhodes.

–=–

“Common sense tells us that the only way to increase the value
of diamonds is to make them scarce, that is to reduce production.”

—Cecil Rhodes, founder of De Beers Mining, who received funding
and for which De Beers is now owned by the founding Zionist ROTHSCHILD FAMILY.

“Our only risk is the sudden discovery of new mines, which
human nature will work recklessly to the detriment of us all.”

—Cecil Rhodes, founder of De Beers Mining

Surprise! Diamonds are all but worthless! The goy can be made to covet any rock or mineral by the manipulative international Jew. They control the markets, production, and pricing of shiny rocks. False scarcity has made gold king, silver queen, and turned the people into greedy debt slaves who have traded their freedom and physical wealth for fiat paper – all to buy jewelry!

–=–


If it were a snake it would have bit you…
For Americans, every dollar we spend not only supports Israel
but also has an embossed Star of David stamped on every note!


The Orion-tation Of Money

The EURion (Orion) Constellation is on most world currencies as a
“security feature”. It is in the shape of a “Z”.


“EURion Constelation” symbols are a counterfeiting measure where each zero
lines up by integer ratios between the squared distances of nearby circles,
shaped as the Orion constellation. This pattern is detected by image-processing software,
which causes the program to refuse to print the document. The Great pyramids
aligned to this Orion-tation (SE) and is very important in masonic custom.

This Orion security feature is now as international as the Zionist influence
that created it, with the all major central banks of the world utilizing it as a
digital watermark on their currencies. The International bankers are the
International bloodline – organized crime extraordinaire.

If currency represents sovereignty, then sovereignty no longer truly exists in this world.

–=–

Margaret Thatcher is also quoted from above as saying:

“Technion’s reputation extends far, far beyond the borders of Israel.
Technion’s work in every field – medicine, science, architecture –
is synonymous with the creation of the modern state of Israel.”

–=–

Upon the death of Margaret Thatcher, the Jewish Press in April 2013 revealed the true history of her treachery to her ridiculously loyal subjects:

“…it was Thatcher’s embrace of British Jews and insistent promotion of Jews in her Conservative Party that inspired an outpouring of tributes from Jewish and Israeli leaders following her death Monday at 87…

For the country’s Jews, however, her naming of several of their number to Cabinet positions and her determined pushback against anti-Jewish grumbling among the Conservative Party’s backbenchers made what once was unimaginable: the possibility of a Jewish prime minister.

Lady Thatcher was always extremely supportive and admiring of the ethos of the British Jewish community,” Vivian Wineman, the president of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, told JTA.

Wineman said the mutual admiration was rooted in personal history. In the 1930s, Thatcher’s family took in an Austrian Jewish refugee. In 1959, Thatcher was elected to Parliament representing Finchley, a north London constituency with a large Jewish population.

She counted a number of Jews among her closest advisers and confidants, and at one point nearly a quarter of her Cabinet were of Jewish origins,” Wineman said.

Moshe Maor, a Hebrew University political science professor whose expertise is Britain, said Thatcher admired the British Jewish community’s self-reliance, an ethos she embraced as she dedicated herself to weaning Britons off public assistance.

“Thatcher admired hard work, and the Jewish community was not dependent on the state,” Maor said. “It was structured in such a way that Jews help others in their community. That was the culture Thatcher tried to advance.”

It was one also embraced by Britain’s late chief rabbi, Immanuel Jakobovits, whom Thatcher elevated to the House of Lords. Frustrated by protests among Christian leaders of the rapid pace of her economic reforms, she increasingly turned for spiritual reinforcement to Jakobovits, who became widely known as “Thatcher’s rabbi.”

Thatcher’s rule coincided with social changes among the country’s 350,000 Jews. Once proudly working class, British Jews by the 1980s had become increasingly middle class, more likely to be self-employed and alarmed at the leftward lurch of the leadership in the Labor Party.

“She got on quite well with Jews,” Wineman said. “She said once that she thought she probably had more constituents in Tel Aviv than in Finchley.”

Thatcher never hesitated to advance the careers of talented young Jews in her party – among them Leon Brittan, a secretary of trade; Nigel Lawson, a chancellor of the exchequer; Edwina Currie, a health minister; Malcolm Rifkind, a secretary of state for Scotland; and Michael Howard, a secretary of employment.

Rifkind went on to become foreign minister. Howard became home secretary and then opposition leader, burying forever the notion that a British leader had to come from the country’s official faith, Anglicanism.

Thatcher’s embrace of the Jewish community did not make its romance with the Tories a permanent one. Tony Blair’s purges of the Labor left after his 1997 election helped draw back some Jewish voters. But Howard’s precedent helped set the stage for ascension of the current leader of the Labor Party, Ed Miliband, the son of Polish Jewish immigrants.

Thatcher also earned kudos for her robust foreign policy and maintaining strong ties with Israel at a time of tension between the Jewish state and other European nations. “She was truly a great leader, a woman of principle, of determination, of conviction, of strength; a woman of greatness,” Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a statement Monday. “She was a staunch friend of Israel and the Jewish people. She inspired a generation of political leaders.”

Source–> http://www.jewishpress.com/news/europe/thatcher-remembered-for-befriending-uk-jews-and-maintaining-strong-ties-with-israel/2013/04/10/

–=–
Establishing Socialism
Through Multiculturalism

–=–

This is the world-wide phenomenon of how, as the above article states, “the unimaginable” election of “Jews” to offices of high authority is now commonplace, especially in predominantly Christian and Muslim countries. Just as in Germany, the Jewish immigrants have taken hold of, culturally infiltrated and tainted, and financially advanced themselves on the backs of societies and majority races across the world. And this is how the governments of the world have been infected.

This article even rubs this corruption and subversion in the face of the British, referring to “anti-Jewish grumbling among the Conservative Party’s backbenchers in other words the actual majority race of British men for whom the international Jews have made insignificant in their own country; just as in the United States and around the nations of the world for all non-Jewish majority cultures and races (goy).

In short, the people no longer have representation…

And this is how “multiculturalism” is being used around the world as a tool for the cultural destruction of significance for all races who have inhabited those countries for 1,000’s of years. For the international Jew must break a nation of its cultural and racial identity before it can corrupt that culture with its own. And to do this, the international Jew must take over the governments of all cultures. This devious plan is implemented in many forms, from “civil rights” to “equal rights”, “naturalization” to “illegal immigration”; “equal opportunity” to the “right of return”, “affirmative action” to “hate crimes”, and in countless other cultural countermeasures that seem glorious and revolutionary.

But what is a revolution, really?

Revolution:

A: a sudden, radical, or complete change.

B: a fundamental change in political organization; especially:
the overthrow or renunciation of one government or ruler
and the substitution of another by the governed.

C: activity or movement designed to effect fundamental
changes in the socioeconomic situation.

D: a fundamental change in the way of thinking about or visualizing
something : a change of paradigm <the Copernican revolution>

We must always remember an inconvenient truth… subjection to law requires consequence and force. This should be understood now more than ever, as nearly all nations of the world have been usurped by international Zionists hell-bent on supporting the re-built Kingdom/State of Israel. You may call them the Ashkenazim or “the Jews” – or those who claim to be but are not Jews. You may call them the Edomites or the Synagogue of Satan. You may call them the Freemasons or the Illuminati. You may call them the Royal bloodlines. But there is no real difference. For all of these pseudonyms have but one final and fundamental purpose in their combined doctrines – to reclaim the Kingdom of Jerusalem (Israel) and rebuild the Temple of Solomon (the 3rd Temple of Ezekiel). The blood is the same. The more you blame just one of these groups instead of all of them together as one blood-force, the more their deeds and usurpation go unseen and unpunished. Truly, a revolution of fundamental change in the way we think in America has already happened, brought on by a fundamental change in political organization by international Zionist infiltration, and this is currently well on its way to having the effect of fundamentally changing our socioeconomic situation in every nation. The people are but following their leaders, never suspecting that this bloodline revolution of leadership had already happened before the people who elected them were even born.

This change (revolution) has not been sudden but incremental, as the Talmud and Protocols demand, though quite radical and very closely complete, so as to be virtually unseen like the growing grass. And it has risen up so high that tradition and culture have been usurped and hidden by the tall infection of weeds.

–=–
Constructing An International
Culture Of  Non-Identity

–=–

“The union which we desire to found will not be a French, English,
Irish,
or German union, but a Jewish one, a Universal one!
Other peoples and races are divided into nationalities;
we alone have no co-citizens, but exclusively co-religionaries…”.
“The day is not distant when all the riches and treasures of the
earth
will become the property of the Children of Israel”.

–The Morning Post of London, on Sept. 6, 1920,
by James Rothschild III: Manifesto to all the Jews of the Universe

–=–

https://i0.wp.com/eyeswideblind.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/Racist-Flag.bmpIt is important to note that the “context” of this particular quote is disputed by Zionist
apologists as a mistranslation of a non-public speech. Of course, 100’s of even more horrific
and racist quotes that litter the Talmud and other rabbinical writings in black
and white are also said by Jews to be contextual and misunderstood by the goy.

–=–

It is purely a logical fallacy to consider the forced intermingling of cultures as in any way good. This ridiculous fallacy is that in order to protect pure blood cultures (majorities and minorities), multiculturalism and interbreeding between those races must be a protected and in some countries even a forced privilege (as we will see below). Cross-race marriage is the poster-child of equality and civil rights issues. Without the Jewish/Masonic concept of political equal rights as a political legal status (a fraternal brotherhood of “citizens”), the minority international Jew would never have been able to corrupt and subvert the majority races by taking seats in their governments. And so the “spread of democracy” continues across the globe through war and oppression (law through force), so that all people become equal under government law (equally enslaved by the privilege of law). In this way, the people can be tricked into “democratically electing” a Jewish/Masonic friendly (Zionist) government against the best interests of all people – a single supremest minority ruling the majorities in most countries of the world. If you control the majority with media brainwashing and propaganda, then you can manipulate public opinion and guide that majority to vote for a minority to represent the majority against its interests. This is madness… and this is the way of the international Jew and of the “United Nations” of the world.

So riddle me this… how does cross-race (multicultural) procreation support or preserve one single race and culture? Isn’t this what we are taught by our Zionist government and media? Isn’t this an oxymoron?

Yet in the international Jewish society of all infiltrated nations, it is absolutely forbidden (with devious exceptions) for such marriages between Jews and non-Jews according to the Jewish Talmud and Torah! The royal bloodlines have been interbreeding for many centuries before Christ. Their whole “religion”, eminence, cultural status, and nobility in society and government is based on pure blood. And the negative (Rh-) and positive (Rh+) blood types do not mix well, often causing birth issues via interbreeding from the two bloods rejecting each other. In other words, while the international Zionist governments are passing laws protecting the infiltration and intermarriage of cultures and races into such countries as France, Germany, United States, and Great Britain with its United Kingdom, breaking 1,000’s of years of the proud racial heritage and heredity of those people, the State of Israel and Zionist international Jewry remains pure blood and generally forbids marriage to non-Jews (non-Jewish blood). Even the royal kings and queens must advocate their thrown for this crime of interbreeding with “commoner” blood. When King Edward advocated his throne due to marriage of a Catholic in 1936, he resigned that throne for his future decedents of that tainted marriage as well…

“I, Edward the Eighth of Great Britain, Ireland, and the British Dominions beyond the Seas, King, Emperor of India, do hereby declare my irrevocable determination to renounce the throne for myself and for my descendants, and my desire that effect should be given to the instrument of abdication immediately…”

(Signed) Edward R.I.

What better way to protect the Edomite race and bloodlines than to force racial equality and mingling in every nation – with the exception of their own – until no proud racial majority, cultural ideal, or moral force is left to oppose you?

–=–

–=–


It is indeed ironic that those Jews who were hunted and loathed yesteryear as illegal immigrants in England are today promoting multicultural immigration in all forms to all countries except in their own xenophobic Meca, Israel, which the United Kingdom all but conquered militarily and created for them through treatise and bloodshed.

Now if this sounds “racist” or “prejudiced” to you, you better take off your rose-colored glasses and pay attention. For the ultimate in racist people are ruling you, infiltrating your cultures, and destroying your family unit in favor of their own “race”. This is not a white issue, for white is not a race – and “white” people of European descent have been blamed unilaterally for the actions of this tiny minority of white-skinned Edomites. It was the Jew who created this fallacy, with the German peoples as its poster child. They suck out all culture and values through that little box in your home called a television, for they are CEO’s of all mainstream media outlets. They are the self-proclaimed master race. And if racism is the appreciation and the study of unique races, what happens when there are only two races left to study – the Jew and the diversely molded mixed-slave-race?

–=–

The 12 step program, or how to usurp a nation and its identity:

Step 1 – Immigrate and infiltrate religious, social, and political constructs.

Step 2 – Set up usurious business practices and promote them as normal; create patriotic catchphrases like “free trade”, “free market”, and “capitalism” as you funnel public funds into your corporate usury-based businesses. Replace natural laws with contracts, duty with forced obligations, and natural rights with political privileges and benefits.

Step 3 – Demand equal rights (protections) under law, not natural or earned ones, and subsume all property as State-owned.

Step 4 – Gain international appeal for the cause of equality within a global media network.

Step 5 – Pretend not to be Jewish or disassociate publicly from Zionism to win government seats.

Step 6 – Through usury and debt, take over the economy with undisclosed public funding.

Step 7 – Win a majority of government seats for Jews and non-Jewish Zionists.

Step 8 – Pass laws requiring taxes to be sent to Jewish organizations, campaigns, and to Israel.

Step 9 – Pass hate speech laws and other forms of protections for all forms of religion/race/sex/organization so as to pretend to be a moral group deserving protection, hiding amongst protected classes.

Step 10 – Revise history and pass new laws making race, culture, and morals obsolete except for your own, supporting Israel and no other nation.

Step 11 – Export labor and manufacturing and import consumerism (utilize trade unions, labor laws, and misuse public funds to support these efforts).

Step 12 – Allow and protect illegal immigration; use propaganda to gain immigrant votes (children are citizens); demonize cultural or racial majority as the enemy of immigrants. After a few generations, a new majority appears, conditioned to be Jewish/Zionist friendly.

Step 13 – Repeat in all countries until each is dependent on the other.

Step 14 – Cause international appeal for war against uncooperative or incorruptible nations if above steps don’t work or if opposed (as in Germany), then place new Zionist/corporate friendly governments through martial law.

–=–

–=–
Chronology Of Jewish Deception And Ruination
–=–

How does one exclaim the horrific history of the genocide, torture, rape, and famine that was perpetrated upon over 100 million white Christian farmers and peoples of Europe, Asia, and the Ethiopian Jews of Africa by the Jewish/Zionist Red Army in the “Bolshevik Revolution”, when the fable of the Nazi holocaust that supposedly killed 6 million Jews (a statistically impossible feat) is promoted and reinforced in every form of mainstream media?

In reality, the communism that was forged and implemented in 1917 continues to this day by its Edomite organizers, the international Zionists, under their oppressive regimes and “allied forces”. Inversely, Nazism rose up in response to this horror to protect the Germanic people from that international Zionist scourge, and only lasted from 1933 through 1945.

Of course, World War I was a “family affair”, as all of the countries involved were ruled by the kindred blood cousins of King George V. There was not war, only a bloodline family manipulating the nationalist fervor of each of its kingdoms and forcing commerce within its corporations. This is called “war”.

It is a little known fact that the Jews in Germany identified themselves as Germans before World War II, and were quite content to stay in Germany. They did not wish to become citizens of the new Israel. They were Germans. It was thus necessary for the World Jewish Congress to create a Jewish problem in Germany by declaring a world-wide economic war on Germany and its people by international Jewry, forcing the German people to respond against the German Jews…

https://i2.wp.com/www.jewisheastend.com/Plaque%20Settlement%20Henriques%20St.jpg
War Memorial Plaque of Oxford and St George’s Settlement
(Bernhard Baron House), London – for World War I


1933

https://i0.wp.com/www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/articles/jdecwardayexp.jpg

https://i2.wp.com/upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8f/MSG_III_1937_Anti-Nazi_Rally.jpgAnti-German protest at Madison Square Garden, 1937
Speakers included John L. Lewis, head of the CIO, New York’s Mayor Fiorello LaGuardia,
and Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, head of the American Jewish Congress.


The Ramaz School forms its name from the initials (RMZ) of the
world renownedRabbi Moses Zevulun Margolies, (1851-1936).
“The RaMaZ” was recognized as dean of the American rabbinate.
In 1933, the RaMaZ here addresses a mass rally at Madison Square Garden
protesting the threat to Jews in Nazi Germany.

Stephen S. Wise, later to become president of the World Jewish Congress, speaks at an anti-Nazi rally at Madison Square Garden. New York, United States, March 27, 1933.
Stephen S. Wise, later president of the World Jewish Congress,
speaks at an anti-Nazi rally at Madison Square Garden in 1933


New York Mayor Fiorello La Guardia speaks at Jewish Labor Committee, 1935.
Here with founding members of the JLC, David Dubinsky of the International
Ladies’ Garment Workers Union and B. Charney Vladeck, chairman of the JLC.
Major efforts of this organization include an anti-Nazi boycott and
efforts to reform U.S. immigration laws that excluded refugees. 

You didn’t think he had an airport named after him
just because he was a mayor, did you?

–=–

Most “labor unions” had a Jewish organized criminal origin. For as with all systems of government, the Jew must first take over the foundation of its prey before it can subvert and destroy. Today, high wages caused by union contracts and otherwise high wages are the primary excuse used by Jewish run corporations for exporting American corporations and labor oversees. The number of corporations that are in general Jewish run and funded by goy taxpayer dollars – government being the main shareholder in most national and international corporations – would astound the average American…

–=–

Boycotting The Jewish 500?

Just a small fraction of Jewish owned business and supporters of Zionism (Israel) are listed here:

1. Sears/K Mart – Sears was controlled nearly from its inception by the Julius Rosenwald family, and then by Max Adler, who married Sophie Rosenwald. A Significant number of the company’s shares are still Jewish controlled to this day.
2. The Home Depot – The Home Depot was founded in 1978 by Bernie Marcus, Arthur Blank (Atlanta Falcons), Ron Brill, and Pat Farrah. This is the second largest retailer in America, behind Wal-Mart. The Jewish founders retain substantial holdings in the company.
3. Victoria’s Secret (Les Wexner)
4. The Limited (Les Wexner)
5. Bath & Body Works (Les Wexner)
6. The Men’s Wearhouse ( George Zimmer)
7. Staples Office Supply (Thomas G. Stemberg)
8. Office Depot (Merged with Staples, Thomas G. Stemberg)
9. Bon Ton Stores (Founded by Max Grumbacher) – Also includes the following stores: Elder-Beerman, Parisian, Saks Inc., Bergner’s, Boston Store, Carson Pirie Scott, Herbergers, Younkers, Pomeroy’s, Maxwell’s, Fowler’s Department Store
10. Steve & Barry’s University Sportswear (Steve Shore & Barry Prevor)
11. The Gap (Donald Fisher, founder, holds 37% of stock)
12. Banana Republic (Donald Fisher, founder, holds 37% of stock)
13. Old Navy (Donald Fisher, founder, holds 37% of stock)
14. American Eagle Outfitters (founded 1904 by Edward Beinstein. Current CEO J.L. Schottenstein)
15. ABC Warehouse
16. Circuit City (founded 1949 as Wards Appliance Store by Samuel S. Wurtzel, Jewish)
17. Costco Warehouses (founded 1954 by Sol Price, Jewish, as Fed Mart)
18. Spencer Gifts (Steve Silverstein, CEO. Privately held corporation)
19. Eddy Bauer
20. Starbucks (Howarad D. Schultz, CEO)

GMAC – Owned by Cerberus Capital Management, which is headed by Steve Feinberg.

“…We would also challenge them to consider that AOL allocates 30% of its investment portfolio in Israel. Does that effect how CNN reports on the Israeli/Palestinian conflict? At NileMedia, we think it does. The “spin” wizards at CNN, TIME and AOL are not in the journalism business.” —Nile Media

–=–

In your free time, take a look at these links to get a real feel at how difficult or impossible it would be to boycott Jewish businesses in America and beyond – especially when considering that governments are generally the largest institutional investor and holder of ownership stock and corporate bonds (loans to fund corporations) of these companies. It is ironic that the lavish lifestyle we have come to expect has been supplied by this corporate takeover by Jewish businesses funded by the taxpayer dollars of the world. (See my “CAFR School” articles for more info on this.)

List of Jewish American Businesspeople: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Jewish_American_businesspeople

Boycott of Jewish business: http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=71304

To start with, we’d have to give up much of our internet experience, for on the internet – Google, Youtube, Facebook, MySpace, Wikipedia (or as I like to call it… do-it-yourself history), Yahoo, Ebay, and many others are great supporters of Zionism.

Porn, ABC, NBC, CBS, FOX, HBO, CNN, MSNBC, Hollywood (all mainstream media, movie, and newspaper outlets), Caterpillar, Est’ee Lauder, Johnson and Johnson, Revlon, Kimberly-Clark (Kleenex and Huggies), Apax Partners (Jonny Rockets, Sunglass Hut), Delta Galil (Barbie, Victoria’s Secret, GAP, Banana Republic, Structure, J. Crew, JC Penny, DKNY, Ralph Lauren, Hugo Boss), Timberland, Siemens, Sara Lee (oh, not the cookies!), The Limited, Nokia, Motorola, AT&T (and most phone companies) Bank of America, Wells Fargo, J.P. Morgan Chase… Oh heck, let’s just say all major banks, shall we? Chevron, BP, Exxon… Ok, I suppose all of the major oil corporations as well – No driving either…

And then there’s our food…

To boycott Nestle Corporation for example would be extremely difficult . You’d have to stop using L’Oreal products. It would mean no more Kit Kats, Baby Ruths, or Butterfingers. No Nesquick or Nescafe’ for breakfast. No sweets or cookies from Libby’s. No Carnation products of any kind. No Buitoni oils, pastas, or sauces. And then there is the bottled water market… Arrowhead, Poland Spring, Perrier, San Pellegrino (Perrier’s competitor – LOL), Calistoga (San Pellegrino’s competitor – LOL2), Crystal Geyser, Ice Mountain, Zephyr Hills, Ozarka, Pure Life/Pureza Vital, Deer Park, Aquapod, Nestle’ Brand, and others… all of which are brands of Nestle’. Essentially, all bottled water brands are Zionist Israel friendly. And why not, for in the classic scheme of usury they are selling something that flows freely to a bunch of us nincompoops who pay top dollar for somewhat filtered tap water!

This brings a whole new meaning to the word Sayan:

Sayan (Hebrew: helpers, assistants) is a term used to describe a network of “Jews” living outside of Israel who volunteer to provide assistance to the Israeli Mossad.

In fact, with regards to our consumerism on a global scale of primarily Jewish products, all the people of the world may as well convert to Judaism – not that their blood would be accepted. For we are all a Sayan in our ignorance of our own consumer-based support of Israel.

The “Jewish Achievement” website states:

“The selection of Irving Shapiro to head Dupont Corporation was a watershed moment in the history of Jews as CEOs of major U.S. Corporations. His appointment was seen to have broken a cultural logjam. It made Wall Street Journal headlines on December 14, 1973 and Shapiro was soon regarded as a prominent “business establishment” figure. For many, he was seen as “the first Jew to achieve such stature in a major corporation not founded or purchased by Jews.”

Shapiro’s selection was remarkable on many counts. In the 171 years since its founding by French immigrant Eleuth̩re Ir̩n̩e (E.I.) du Pont in 1802, the Company was headed only by succeeding generations of Dupont family members. Further, Shapiro was neither an entrepreneur, nor was he trained as a manager. He did not, as was common in post World War II America, work his way up the organization chart through the rungs of operational, sales, and staff jobs…”

Remember, the boards of directors of corporations elect the CEO, and the shareholders of stock vote via proxy for the boards of directors. When government’s started gaining in power with their stock portfolios and banding together in “corporate governance”, while also taking over the international governments of the world as leaders, it is no wonder that  a “family company” would suddenly be run by a Jew with no experience or honor. And so it is even more disturbing to note that when a corporation moves to say China, it is the government that is voting to make that happen at the expense of its own people. Literally, government through its proxy shareholder votes often forces this to happen. Even worse, government funds the move and construction costs to export manufacturing by offering corporate bonds from taxpayer money. America is an excellent example of what happens to a people when its government is usurped by the intentional Zionist powers and used against that people to cause them to be in debt and dependance. While it took war to ruin Germany, America has been slowly demolished from the inside – its people too scared to be portrayed as “Nazi’s” for fighting the international Jew that has made them debt slaves.

A brilliant incremental plan of manipulation and take-over, if you ask me…

–=–

DuPont corporation is also a perfect example of the danger of segregating the word “Jew” absent of words like Masonry, royal bloodlines, church, etc, as if they are not connected. For the DuPont family were bloodline cousins of the royal families – of the Plantagenet kings and queens of England and beyond who lost the Kingdom of Jerusalem and created the Magna Carta, The Constitution, and the Declaration of Independence…

Royal Arms of England (1198-1340).svg
Angevins – House of Plantagenet “Coat of Arms”
Founded by: Geoffrey Plantagenet, Count of Anjou
Last Sovereign: Richard III of England

Kingdom of England, Kingdom of France, Lordship of Ireland, Principality of Wales

Religions:
Roman Catholicism (official), Greek Orthodoxy,
Syrian Orthodoxy, Islam, Judaism

Capital City of the Kingdom of Jerusalem: Jerusalem (1099–1187)
Tyre (1187–1191)
Acre (1191–1229)
Jerusalem (1229–1244)
Acre (1244–1291)


Near East in 1135.
The kingdom of Jerusalem and the other Crusader states.
Today, it stands as the reconquered kingdom – the “State” of Israel,
and the bloodlines rule their Kingdom once more.

Read about the Kings of Jerusalem, here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Kings_of_Jerusalem

–=–

Perhaps you’ve noticed this Coat of Arms lion or variations of it (horses, serpents, etc.) on many of the product packages you purchase and consume? Or perhaps you passed over it with a cursory glance…

If you buy cigarettes, you see this:

The family crests for the bloodline royal houses decorate and adorn many products. Here we see the phrase “veni-vidi-vici” under that Masonic royal symbol.

Translated, this is a phrase exclaimed by Julius Caesar which means, “I came – I saw – I conquered”.

Indeed, cigarettes are a crowning achievement in the conquering of the consumer idiocracy, for government has financially funded and invested in the corporations that have addicted all nations while being the regulators of those products.

After it taxes the hell out of the consumer, government then uses those taxpayer monies
to reinvest in the same corporations that make other taxable products!
Government then deceivingly uses reverse psychology as advertising to
justify its allowance of such addictive, harmful, and deadly products.
For government is also heavily invested in the medical and pharmaceutical
industries that treat the illnesses caused from these legal products.
More profits, more taxes, more investments…

–=–

And the people actually defend their addictions as if it were their own free will…

–=–

This is certainly not a new model, for the Honorable East India Company
has been addicting the nations of the world for centuries…
as well-depicted here in the movie “The Rising”

–=–

Coat of Arms for Bristol, England

Coat of Arms for the  House of Stuart which reigned between 1603 and 1688.
Henry VIII made a law mandating the display of the royal coat of arms in all churches.

Coat of Arms of the Netherlands

–=–


Coat of Arms for… a tobacco company?

–=–

And I’m sure alcoholics drink because its their choice…

File:Grand Marnier.svg


Even the enforcement arms of government use the Coat of Arms
The bloodline’s brilliant trinity… Addiction, Taxation, Re-Investment
Government is also heavily invested in the private prison industry!
It profits at every turn, from every angle.

–=–

An easy way to understand how government capitalizes (funds) corporations and stands as major stockholder and bond lender is to simply scan through a typical public pension asset holdings report.

If you want the shock of your life, especially when you consider how many public pension funds there are in the world all controlled by Jewish influenced and infiltrated governments – who vote on issues within these corporations as shareholders like election of board-members and mergers and acquisitions – then take a look at just one report here, from the largest Pension fund in America:

Link–>http://www.calpers.ca.gov/eip-docs/about/pubs/annual-investment-report-2012.pdf

When one single government agency has 15,036,400 shares of EXXON MOBIL CORP with a market value of $1.3 billion dollars (see report), is it any wonder that governments don’t take oil companies to task for their spills? It would be bad for the investment portfolio and cut into government dividends from its stock ownership in EXXON!!!

–=–

The temptation for the average worker to earn higher wages than others as a “privilege” of membership to labor unions was and important key to destroying the economic strength of the people in America. For as the Jew knows all to well… there can be no lavish wealth without equally lavish inequity and poverty. By first establishing equal rights, it was then able to grant special rights and privileges through license to only certain workers, creating a purposeful wealth and class-structure within otherwise skill-less men. And it succeeded in turning slaves into house-slaves; men that would literally fight for their union benefits to the death against their starving brethren. The laborers know that unless others are not protected as they are in their labor unions, they would not earn higher wages for doing the same types of jobs as others. This carrot on a stick ironically created class distinctions even among skill-less laborers.  Its the golden rule – wealth requires poverty. For without poverty, wealth simply cannot be measured. And this is the razor sharp edge of how equality destroys. The establishment of inequality requires the forced endowment of equal rights as a legal status by government, for legal equality (civil rights) takes away all individual liberty and gives power to the representatives of a uniformly equal citizenry – one voice for the entirety of all individuals who give up all personal rights to the group (community), while actually believing that equality is a good thing. Again, how else can the international Jew become equal and protected in all societies and in its organized crime, subversion, and then usurpation of representative (legislative) positions in government (thus controlling the nation), without first forcing legal equality and civil rights that protect the Jew in countries where throughout history the Jew has been exiled? This horrific transformation and corruption of morals and culture allowed the Zionist power of the international Jew first as protected, then as equal, and now as elite.

But this equality is not real – it is not in the hearts and minds of men – for it is nothing but a legal status. It is a piece of paper that the people of Germany realized all to well must be torn to shreds in order to route out the literal parasites who created it.

Equal rights is literally the socialist destruction of all cultures around the world. For this type of equality is not earned but granted without merit. This is not real equality of the heart, but is a false status forced upon all people by force. It is actually another name for slavery. So, where for centuries this Synagogue of Satan has been physically and violently removed and exiled from nations and lands far and wide, it now rests comfortably as a protected and equal religion, a protected and equal false “race”, and the ruler of all of those nations and peoples it once fled in fear from.

Wikipedia states:

Fiorello La Guardia’s mother, Irene Coen, was a Jew from Trieste, the Austro-Hungarian Empire; his maternal grandmother Fiorina Luzzatto Coen was a “Luzzatto”, a member of the prestigious Italian-Jewish family of scholars, kabbalists, and poets and including the famous rabbi Samual David Luzzatto. La Guardia was elected mayor of New York City on an anti-corruption Fusion ticket during the Great Depression, which united him in an alliance with New York’s Jewish population and liberal bluebloods (WASPs). In 1937, speaking before the Women’s Division of the American Jewish Congress, La Guardia called for the creation of a special pavilion at the upcoming New York World’s Fair “a chamber of horrors” for “that brown-shirted fanatic“. La Guardia’s sister, Gemma La Guardia Gluck, was arrested by the Germans in a roundup of Jews in Hungary in 1944. She was held under privileged conditions at Ravensbrück concentration camp and released after the war. David Rockefeller became La Guardia’s “secretary” for eighteen months in a “dollar a year” public service position, filling the office of the deputy mayor. In 1941, President Roosevelt appointed La Guardia as the director of the new Office of Civilian Defense (OCD).

–=–

Program for a counter-Olympics held in Randall's Island, New York, in August 1936. The event was sponsored by the Amateur Athletic Union, the American Federation of Labor, the Jewish Labor Committee, and New York City Mayor Fiorello LaGuardia.
Program for a counter-Olympics held in Randall’s Island, New York, in August 1936.
It was sponsored by the Amateur Athletic Union, the American Federation of Labor,
the Jewish Labor Committee, and New York City Mayor Fiorello LaGuardia.
(USHMM #14921/Jewish Labor Committee Collection, New York University)

This cartoon appeared in <i>The Jewish Chronicle</i>, July 10, 1936. The text, laden with sarcasm, says: “Nazis are officially instructed to be courteous to Jews from June 30 to September 1 so that visitors to the Olympic Games may take away a good impression. 1) It is forbidden to bump Jews with iron bars without first saying excuse me. 2) It is forbidden to kick Jewesses in tramcars without first rising and offering your seat.”
This cartoon appeared in The Jewish Chronicle, July 10, 1936.
“Nazis are officially instructed to be courteous to Jews from June 30 to September 1
so that visitors to the Olympic Games may take away a good impression.”

Maintaining the illusion of the “evil German Nazi” was difficult and, like the holocaust,
had to be explained away when the fallacy was visibly rebutted –
Here, fallacy is being promoted that the Nazis are not on good behavior at all times,
but only at the Olympics because they are on film or will be witnessed. Ironically, they are only evil
when there are no real witnesses to corroborate the Jewish stories…

–=–

File:1936 World Jewish Congress First Plenary Assembly Geneva.jpg
First Plenary Assembly of the World Jewish Congress in Geneva, August 1936
This is world organized crime in the making.

File:1948 World Jewish Congress Montreux - 1.jpg
Delegates at the Second Plenary Assembly of the
World Jewish Congress in Montreux, Switzerland, June 1948

https://i2.wp.com/www.loc.gov/exhibits/haventohome/images/hh0183s.jpg
President Truman signs United States recognition of the “State” of Israel

File:World Jewish Congress - Third Plenary Assembly - Geneva 1953.jpg
Third Plenary Assembly of the World Jewish Congress,
Geneva, Switzerland, 4-11 August 1953

https://i0.wp.com/upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/96/1975_WJC_Sixth_Plenary_Assembly_Jerusalem.jpg/330px-1975_WJC_Sixth_Plenary_Assembly_Jerusalem.jpg
Nahum Goldman addressing the Sixth WJC Plenary in Jerusalem in 1975.
Seated on the right: Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin

–=–
The Jewish newspaper Natscha Retsch wrote:

“The war against Germany will be waged by all Jewish communities, conferences, congresses… by every individual Jew. Thereby the war against Germany will ideologically enliven and promote our interests, which require that Germany be wholly destroyed. The danger for us Jews lies in the whole German people, in Germany as a whole as well as individually. It must be rendered harmless for all time…. In this war we Jews have to participate, and this with all the strength and might we have at our disposal.”

**Note: This is racism, also known as eugenics

This Jewish declaration of war and boycott preceded Hitler’s infamous speech of March 28, 1933, which was purely a defensive rebuttal of this declaration of economic war by international Zionism. It was certainly and rightly labeled as a “Jewish problem”.

The Balfour Declaration of 1917 committed the British government to ‘view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people’ – as long as this did not ‘prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine’.

Vladimir Jabotinsky, founder of the Irgun Zvai Leumi terrorist organisation, wrote in the January 1934 issue of Mascha Rjetach:

“For months now the struggle against Germany is waged by each Jewish community at each conference in all our syndicates and by each Jew all over the world. There is reason to believe that our part in this struggle has general value. We will start a spiritual and material war of all the world against Germany’s ambitions to become once again a great nation, to recover lost territories and colonies. But our Jewish interests demand Germany’s total destruction, collectively and individually. The German nation is a threat to us Jews.’

Emil Ludwig Cohen wrote in his book The New Holy Alliance, Strasburg, 1938:

“Even if Hitler at the last moment would want to avoid war which would destroy him he will, in spite of his wishes, be compelled to wage war.”

Bernard Lechache wrote in The Right to Live (December 1938):

“It is our task to organize the moral and cultural blockade of Germany and disperse this nation. It is up to us to start a merciless war.

The Jewish newspaper Central Blad Voor Israeliten in Nederlands printed on 13 September 1939:

“The millions of Jews living in America, England, France, North Africa and South, not forgetting Palestine, have decided to carry on the war in Germany to the very end. It is to be a war of extermination.

The Toronto Star (26 February 1940) printed a declaration of a Rabbi Perlberg, Director of the British section of the Jewish World Congress:

“The Jewish World Congress is in a state of war with Germany for seven years.”

The Jewish magazine Sentinel of Chicago printed in its issue of October 8th, 1940:

“When the National Socialists and their friends cry or whisper that this [war] is brought about by Jews, they are perfectly right.”

And now, the United Nations has been established and is used to declare an international military or economic war with any who do not cooperate with the International Jew. The term “United Nations” gains much more sympathy than the term “World Jewish Congress”, now doesn’t it? And the people of the nations have no idea that their nations were sold.

–=–

Now that international Jewry had instigated an economic war, we see the true
historical perspective of why Germany then defensively boycotted Jewish businesses…

–=–

The one-day German Boycott of April 1, 1933

This was partially a reprisal and an act of revenge against
Gruelpropaganda (atrocity stories) that German and foreign Jews,
assisted by foreign journalists, were allegedly circulating in the
international press to damage Nazi Germany’s reputation…
The organized world Jewish population of every nation against Germany…

The Star of David (Solomon’s Seal) was painted in yellow and black across thousands of
doors and windows, with accompanying anti-commerce slogans against Jews. Signs were
posted saying “Don’t Buy from Jews” and “The Jews Are Our Misfortune.

This is nothing when considering that Jews were openly declaring Germany’s
and the German people’s individual annihilation and extermination.


Note: this is a German businessman, not a soldier.

The German people stood with the Nazi without fear,
for their country and way of life was at stake from within and without.

In 1920, Hitler stated:

 “This Jewish contamination will not subside, this poisoning of the nation will not end,
until the carrier himself, the Jew, has been banished.”

–The War Path: Hitler’s Germany 1933-1939 from an August 1920 speech in Salzburg

–=–

It is clear that no one can argue with this insightful premonition – regardless of your opinion of this man – and that now we certainly have a world-wide poisoning and infection of all nations. Indeed, this type of boycott should be the scene in America for every business that hires illegal workers at illegal poverty wages and for every /Israel supporting corporation (which is most of them), for history shows that non-violent boycotts work all too well. And this would recognize the destruction of world Jewish power over the people, if the people would simply stop supporting and feeding their own parasites.

But the people watch TV provided by the Jew to entertain, distract, and sell to the goy Jewish “Kosher” products…

Also note that the word “banished” is used here by Hitler. For the Jew had been banished from many nations before poisoning Germany’s well. The notion of the holocaust is a fiction by Jews as we will see later, which covers up the real holocaust of the Jewish run Red Army in Russia. Hitler’s  “Final Solution” was a transfer agreement for deportation of Jews to Palestine in agreement with the Jewish Congress, not their extermination. And this was the goal for the Jewish Congress from the beginning. Even today, Israel offers 10’s of thousands of shekels for Iranian Jews to immigrate to Israel. But like the German Jews, the Iranian Jews identify as Iranians, not Israelis. In this way, Iran is the New Germany.

Fortunately, the Germans and the Red Cross kept meticulous records of this and the true livelihood of Jews in camps – including 100’s upon 100’s of live births. This is so obviously contrary to the concept of extermination… that is, the birth of more Jews and the care they received in state of the art hospitals in the “camps” contradicts the fallacious thought that Jews were being “gassed” and exterminated. A little logic goes a long way!

Hitler’s first response was defensive, not offensive – a single day of boycotting Jewish businesses in Germany in retaliation to the Jewish led boycott by world Jewry in March of 1933. The German economy was already in shambles, and an international boycott on German goods was a literal declaration of war by the international Zionist’s who sought its destruction and the exportation of German Jews to Palestine (leading to the “Transfer Agreement”). This response by Germans was as pathetic a reaction as is happening today, around the world, toward this international Zionist power and its deprivation of world-wide culture and society – the unseen enemy of all men.

An International Jewish Boycott Conference was later held in Amsterdam to coordinate the ongoing boycott campaign, part of the newly proclaimed “World Jewish Economic Federation” (WJEF).

Samuel Untermyer, elected president of the WJEF, delivered this speech on BBC radio, a transcript of which was printed in The New York Times on August 7, 1933, calling for a “sacred war” against Germany:

“When the tale is told… the world will confront a picture so fearful in its barbarous cruelty that the hell of war and the alleged Belgian atrocities pale into insignificance as compared to this devilishly, deliberately, cold-bloodedly planned and already partially executed campaign for the extermination of a proud, gentle, loyal, law-abiding people.. The Jews are the aristocrats of the world. From time immemorial they have been persecuted and have seen their persecutors come and go. They alone have survived. And so will history repeat itself, but that furnishes no reason why we should permit this reversion of a once great nation to the Dark Ages or fail to rescue these 600,000 human souls from the tortures of hell… What we are proposing and have already gone far toward doing, is to prosecute a purely defensive economic boycott that will undermine the Hitler regime and bring the German people to their senses by destroying their export trade on which their very existence depends… We propose to and are organizing world opinion to express itself in the only way Germany can be made to understand…”

Chaim Weizmann, president of both the international “Jewish Agency” and of the World Zionist Organization (and later Israel’s first president), told British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain in a letter published in The London Times on September 6th, 1939 that:

“I wish to confirm, in the most explicit manner, the declarations which I and my colleagues have made during the last month, and especially in the last week, that the Jews stand by Great Britain and will fight on the side of the democracies. Our urgent desire is to give effect to these declarations [against Germany]. We wish to do so in a way entirely consonant with the general scheme of British action, and therefore would place ourselves, in matters big and small, under the coordinating direction of His Majesty’s Government. The Jewish Agency is ready to enter into immediate arrangements for utilizing Jewish manpower, technical ability, resources, etc.”

In other words, international Jewry became the army of Great Britain and subject of the crown, with the goal of establishing Israel – the goal of all involved. That included the German Jews residing in Germany…

Rsgba
A man in the Jewish Brigade, a segment of the British Army
that fought the Germans in Italy in 1944. The rocket says “Hitler’s Gift”.


Jew Oscar Westreich left Berlin and gained a new identity in Palestine.
He eventually joined the British army, whose training of Jewish soldiers proved
crucial to the formation of Israel, as his daughter, Mira Bar-Hillel, explains.
It was British forces who, through this international alliance with the Synagogue of Satan,
forcefully “reconquered” the land of Palestine to claim and re-create the Kingdom of Jerusalem.
And the Temple of Solomon is now ready to be rebuilt.

For unknown to most people, the Star of David is actually the Seal of Solomon.
And the founding of Israel is to Rebuild his 3rd Temple
and reclaim the Kingdom of Jerusalem.

“Set me as a seal upon thy heart”
Song of Solomon 8:6

–=–
Genocide Of Semetics By Ashkenazim
–=–


Jewish immigrant from Ethiopia at Ben Gurion International Airport,
October 29, 2012. Israel recently passed a law banning undocumented
immigrants from sending money out of Israel.

–=–

It is ironic that most people would not consider a black Jew.

It is also the consequence of claiming a Jewish homeland while posing as a Semitic people that ALL JEWS must be allowed to immigrate into Israel. This fact has lead to the severe mistreatment, murder, and genocide by the Ashkenazim against the true Semitic peoples of the world.

Thus, we must consider the illegal “State” of Israel is the enemy of the true Jewish people – the actual Semite lines – which are the black African and Arab people of darker skin. These white Ashkenazim Edomites are the royal bloodlines, the kings and queens, the Order.

One aspect of this age-old genocidal attack on the true Semitic peoples was recently reported upon in Israel by Harretz:

“An inconceivable crime…

Israel’s patronizing and inhumane treatment of Ethiopian women is nothing new.

It’s hard to believe, but in Israel, in 2012, Ethiopian women are forced to receive injections of the Depo-Provera contraceptive. This injection is not a commonly prescribed means of contraception. It is considered a last resort and is usually given to women who are institutionalized or developmentally disabled.”

Source–> http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/an-inconveivable-crime.premium-1.484110

Time Magazine reported in March, 2013, about this Ashkenazim imposed racism against the true Semites:

Israeli Deputy Health Minister Yaakov Litzman has called for an investigation into the reported administering of Depo-Provera contraceptive shots to Ethiopian immigrant women without consent. Depo-Provera is a progestrogin-only contraceptive that is administered every three months through injection. According to Dr. Paula Franklin of Marie Stopes International who spoke with TIME, it is a “safe, medium-term reversible hormonal contraceptive” that is used around the world by women of “informed consent.” However, countless Ethiopian women have reportedly been given this contraceptive without understanding or consent.

The news that Ethiopian women were being injected with Depo-Provera, a contraceptive shown to have links with bone loss, emerged in December 2012 following a documentary by Israeli journalist Gal Gabai. In her short film titled Where Did the Children Disappear to, Gabai revealed that, in the past decade, the birthrate among Ethiopian immigrants had decreased by 50%, writes the Jewish Daily Forward. She discovered that women were denied proper family-planning counseling or an outline of birth control methods from medical staff, while others were informed that their entry into Israel would be blocked if they refused to take the contraceptive, notes the Guardian. Many had no idea what they were being injected with. In the documentary, Gabai offers two possible explanations — either it is “an intention to do good, to prevent poverty and to help with the adjustment to Western urbanized living,” or it’s an “economic calculation to reduce immigration and absorption costs.” “This story reeks of racism, paternalism and arrogance,” Gabai told viewers during the broadcast on Israeli Educational Television.

https://i2.wp.com/www.loc.gov/exhibits/haventohome/images/hh0194s.jpgMoorish Zionist [sic] Temple in Harlem, New York, taken in 1929 by James Van Der Zee,
acclaimed African American photographer who chronicled the Harlem Renaissance.
Note that the American flag and a flag of Zion appear next to one another.
–=–

File:1957 WJC meeting with Mitterrand in Paris.jpgFrench Justice Minister François Mitterrand (left) and leaders of
the World Jewish Congress at a meeting in Paris in June 1957

http://i2.wp.com/www.loonwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/sarkozy-avec-kepa.jpg?resize=320%2C219
France – President Nicolas Sarkozy
Sarkozy with Menorah
France – President Nicolas Sarkozy

France – President Nicolas Sarkozy

–=–
Forced Integration By Law
–=–

In December of 2008, Sarkozy made a disturbing speech. The Brussels Journal reports:

“Recently Nicolas Sarkozy announced plans to pursue a vigorous policy of diversity and métissage. Concretely, this means giving preference to minorities in job hiring and prosecuting those who do not comply. In other words, affirmative action as a government policy from which none are exempt.

In his message Sarkozy insisted that the French people must change, that there will be dire consequences if they don’t, and that not to intermarry racially is bad for the survival of the country. Thus he amalgamated the concepts of preference for minorities in job hiring with that of the need for the French to intermarry racially.”

(Source–>http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/3764)

Some translated excerpts from that speech:

“(…) the objective is to meet the challenge of “métissage” – the challenge of “métissage” that the 21st century is confronting us with. The challenge of “métissage”, France has always been familiar with it, and by meeting the challenge of “métissage” France remains faithful to her history. Moreover, it is consanguinity that has always provoked the end of civilizations and societies.

The verb “métisser” theoretically means to mix blood or to crossbreed, but at times it is used more loosely to mean mix cultures. Sarkozy uses the word, or a form of it, at least 7 times in the first few seconds of his speech.

Other meanings for the word “métisser”?

Take your pick…

“Crossbreeding”; “racial mixing”; “miscegenation”; “mongrelisation” and “bastardisation”.

At the conclusion, Sarkosy stated:

“Ladies and Gentlemen, this is the last thing: If republican will power does not function, it will be necessary for the Republic to resort to even more forcible methods… But we don’t have a choice. Diversity at the base of the country must be reflected by diversity at the head of the country… It is not a choice. It is an obligation. It is an imperative. We cannot do otherwise at the risk of finding ourselves faced with considerable problems… We must change, so we will change.”

Note that Sarkosy is born of a French mother and a Hungarian Jewish father…

–=–


France – President Francois Hollande


France – Bernard Kouchner, Foreign Minister


Georgia – President Mikheil Saakashvili


Georgia – President Mikheil Saakashvili


Germany – Chancellor Angela Merkel at Yad Vashem, Israel


Germany – Chancellor Angela Merkel


Germany – Chancellor Angela Merkel with Netanyahu (and Bush)

–=–
The Zionist Planned Genocide Of Germany
–=–

It was an amazingly brilliant piece of public relations gumption to have perverted history into making Germany out to be the bad guy. The Jewish plan to exterminate the German people was present in World War 1 and Bolshevism, carried over to World War 2, and will no doubt culminate in World War 3.

Mark Weber exposes the historical goals of international Zionism and Jewry:

Photobucket
Germany Must Perish!
by Theodore N. Kaufman, Newark, N.J., Argyle press, Copyright 1941
Library of Congress Call No.: DD222.K3

–=–

Begin Excerpt:

Theodore N. Kaufman, the author of Germany Must Perish, was a Manhattan-born Jewish businessman who was also chairman of a group that called itself the “American Federation for Peace.” The first edition of this slim volume was published in 1940 or early 1941. A second, 96-page edition, which sold for 25 cents, was published in 1941 by Argyle Press of Newark, New Jersey. Both editions were issued when the United States was still officially neutral, that is, before the Pearl Harbor attack of December 7, 1941, that brought the U.S. openly into World War II.

Kaufman’s fervent proposal for the systematic sterilization of the entire German population was given respectful attention in the American press, including reviews in a number of newspapers. A review in the weekly Time magazine, March 24, 1941, called Kaufman’s plan a “sensational idea.”

Germany’s propaganda chief, Joseph Goebbels, seized with delight on the book. “This Jew [Kaufman] has done a disservice to the enemy,” Goebbels privately commented. “If he had composed the book at my behest he couldn’t have done a better job.”

At his direction the German press played up Kaufman’s call for genocide. A front page article about the book in the Berlin daily Der Angriff, July 23, 1941, appeared under headlines that called it a “Diabolical Plan for the Extermination of the German People” and a work of “Old Testament Hatred.” Extracts also appeared, for example, in the nationally-circulated weekly paper Das Reich, August 3, 1941.

A plan similar to Kaufman’s was issued during the war years by a prominent American anthropologist. In an article headlined “Breed War Strain Out of Germans” in the New York daily newspaper P.M., January 4, 1943, Ernest Hooton laid out an “outbreeding” plan that would “destroy German nationalism and aggressive ideology while retaining and perpetuating desirable German biological and sociological capacities.” (See also: Benjamin Colby, ‘Twas a Famous Victory, 1974, p. 131.)

The Harvard University professor’s proposal called for genetically transforming the German nation by encouraging mating of German women with non-German men, who would be brought into the country in large numbers, and of German men, forcibly held outside of Germany, with non-German women. Ten to twelve million German men would be assigned to forced labor under Allied supervision in countries outside of Germany to rebuild their economies. “The objects of this measure,” wrote Dr. Hooton, “include reduction of the birthrate of ‘pure’ Germans, neutralization of German aggressiveness by outbreeding and denationalization of indoctrinated individuals.”

This plan, Hooton estimated, would require at least 20 years to be implemented. “During this period,” he went on, “encourage also the immigration and settlement in the German states of non-German nationals, especially males.”

In the decades since the end of World War II, something of the spirit of the genocidal Kaufman and Hooton plans seems manifest in Germany’s population and immigration policies. Since the nation’s defeat in 1945, the German birth rate has fallen to below the replacement level, millions of racially and culturally alien migrants have been welcomed as settlers in Germany, the number of children of mixed ethnicity has sharply increased, and the ethnic-cultural character of much of the country has been drastically altered, especially in the larger cities.

This dynamic volume outlines a comprehensive plan for the extinction of the German nation and the total eradication from the earth, of all her people. Also contained herein is a map illustrating the possible territorial dissection of Germany and the apportionment of her lands…

End Excerpt

You may read the text of the publication “Germany Must Perish” on Weber’s sight, here:
http://ironlight.wordpress.com/2010/04/22/mainstream-jewish-pre-war-outline-for-german-extermination/

–=–


Greece – Georgios Papandreou in Yad Vashem, Israel


Holland – Queen Beatrix

Hungarian PM with kippa
Hungary – Prime Minister Ferenc Gyurcsany

File:ViktorOrban-WorldJewishCongress-Budapest2013.jpg
Hungary – Prime Minister Viktor Orbán addressing the opening dinner of
the Plenary Assembly of the World Jewish Congress in Budapest, 5 May 2013
The newly elected Jewish World Congress for 2013

–=–

From the World Jewish Congress website and its 2013 meeting in Budapest, Hungary:

Delegates also elected Baron David de Rothschild from France as the new chairman of the WJC Governing Board, which is the highest decision-making body between plenary assemblies. Chella Safra from Brazil was named as the new treasurer of the organization and will oversee the financial management of the WJC. Moshe Kantor, the president of the European Jewish Congress, was elected as chairman of the WJC Policy Council, and Mervyn Smith from South Africa will be the co-chairman. The Policy Council advises the Executive Committee on matters of policy, programming and the implementation of the mission of the World Jewish Congress.

The Plenary Assembly also changed the WJC Constitution to ensure that the sitting senior lay leaders of the 12 largest Jewish communities in the world Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Hungary, Russia, South Africa. Ukraine, United States of America) automatically have a seat on the new WJC Executive

The (2013) gathering in Budapest was notably addressed by Hungarian Prime Minister Victor Orbán, who said that “anti-Semitism today in Hungary is unacceptable, and we will show zero tolerance in regards to it.” Introducing Orbán, Ronald Lauder called on Hungary and the government to do more against growing anti-Semitism, notably coming from the extreme-right Jobbik party.

Mazsihisz President Péter Feldmájer said in his speech at the opening dinner: “I believe that the Jews of the world must unite their forces. This day also shows us that we are not alone, we are all listening to each other no matter where we may be living across the globe. The task we have is no little one to handle.

Germany’s Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle said in his keynote address on Monday, which was received with a standing ovation by the delegates: “Anti-Semitism has no place neither in Berlin, nor in Budapest, nor anywhere else in Europe or in the world… We are firmly committed to protecting and nourishing Jewish life in our societies and to countering anti-Semitism across the globe. We have to tackle the root causes of anti-Semitism.”

Discussions about effective ways to combat the rise of neo-Nazi parties in Europe took center-stage in Budapest, and the Plenary Assembly adopted a resolution which called on Hungary “to recognize that Jobbik and its subsidiaries “pose a fundamental threat to Hungary’s democracy” and that “decisive action … must now be taken to take effective measures including by enacting and enforcing legislation, for the protection of all citizens and residents of this country, in particular vulnerable minorities such as the Roma and the Jews, against threats of violence, racist hate and insults and the denial of the Holocaust.”

The WJC also urged national leaders and legislators in Europe to join the 125 legislators from more than 40 countries in signing the London Declaration on Combating Anti-Semitism.”

(Source–>http://www.worldjewishcongress.org/en/news/13476/world_jewish_congress_plenary_assembly_in_budapest)

–=–


Italy – Prime Minister Silivio Berlusconi


Italy – Prime Minister Silivio Berlusconi


Italy – Foreign Minister Gianfranco Fini


Italy – Foreign Minister Gianfranco Fini


Italian Prime Minister Mario Monti at the
Council on Foreign Relations in New York on Sept. 27.

Italy’s prime minister promised Italian Jews he would stand beside them in the fight against anti-Semitism and Holocaust denial.

“We know that anti-Semitism has not been eradicated in Europe,” Italian Prime Minister Mario Monti said at a ceremony Tuesday night marking the 69th anniversary of the World War II round-up and deportation of 1,024 Roman Jews to Auschwitz. “We will not leave you alone.”

Monti, who was joined by Rome’s mayor, several government ministers and other officials, spoke before several thousand people gathered outside Rome’s Great Synagogue to mark the anniversary. Earlier, many had taken part in a torchlight memorial march through the city.

Monti promised that the government would act against mounting racial prejudice and xenophobia in Europe.”

Source–>http://www.jewishjournal.com/world/article/italian_prime_minister_says_he_will_stand_by_countrys_jews

And you thought Italy was an Italian and Catholic nation?

“Holocaust denial” is code for people who present actual provable, historical facts that disprove the outrageous claims that 6 million Jews were placed into mythical ovens in concentration camps during World War II – or that any were cooked at all. The immediate response is to build a straw-man argument that the presenter of these facts is “anti-Semitic” thereby bypassing the facts and using ad hominem fallacy to attack the messenger instead of acknowledging the fact that cannot be dis-proven. This is a classic elicitation used by attorneys. To elicit something means the use of trickery and word magic to obtain something not due. Again, the term “Jewish” was added to the definition of Semitic last century, and so the use of that word is fallacious from the start!

What is a Semite?

  1. A member of a group of Semitic-speaking peoples of the Near East and northern Africa, including the Arabs, Arameans, Babylonians, Carthaginians, Ethiopians, Hebrews, and Phoenicians.

A Semite is defined here as of Arab and even African decent. And the Hebrews were of darker skin. Therefore, to say one is anti-Semetic would mean that one is anti-Arab, anti-Black African, and anti-Hebrew. But only in the last 100 years has this term been hijacked and used to describe a strictly anti-Jewish connotation.

The term Sephardim includes most Mizrahi Jews, and in Israel this term sometimes means any Jew who is not Ashkenazim. Sephardi Jews are of Arab decent, and many have the semblance of the Spanish people due to their historic settlement and commingling in areas inside and around Spain.

Jews who came from Eastern Europe and Russia are called Ashkenazim.

But are these people really Semetic, or just pretending?

This question is answered later in this presentation…

The name Ashkenaz was first used in the Middle Ages for Jews living along the Rhine River in northern France and western Germany. Many of these Jews later migrated eastward and formed communities in Germany, Poland, Austria, Eastern Europe and Russia between the 10th and 19th centuries. Ashkenazic Jews developed their own language, Yiddish, by combining Hebrew with German. Likewise, they developed a distinct culture by combining Jewish culture with the culture of the countries in which they lived.

The white-skinned Ashkenazim even claim anti-Semetism as a trick – an ad hominem fallacious attack on the messenger, not the message.

But don’t take my word for it, let them tell you the truth:

–=–

http://i0.wp.com/www.loonwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/koizumi_yarmulke.jpg?resize=294%2C350
Japan – Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi, Western wall

Montenegro – Prime Minister Igor Luksic


Norway – Former Prime Minister Gro-Harlem-Brundtland,
Former Brazilian President Fernando Henrique Cardoso,
Former United States President Jimmy Carter,
Former Irish President Mary Robinson,
South African Archbishop Emeritus Desmond Tutu

–=–
From Israel To Palestine And Back Again:
Radioactively
Poetic Justice
–=–

The Sunday Times front-page report published on June 19, 1977,  first revealed to the world that Israeli authorities had been torturing Palestinian prisoners, that this torture was “widespread and systematic,” and that it “appears to be sanctioned at some level as deliberate policy.” At the time Israeli officials and Jewish-Zionist leaders in the United States protested the Sunday Times revelations, and denied the charge. Later, though, Israeli torture of prisoners was independently verified by Amnesty International, and other organizations.

–=–

Israel is working on an “ethnically targeted” biological weapon that would kill or harm Arabs but not Jews, according to Israeli military and western intelligence sources cited in a front-page report in the London Sunday Times, November 15, 1998 (“Israel Planning ‘Ethnic’ Bomb as Saddam Caves In,” by Uzi Mahnaimi and Marie Colvin).

In developing this “ethno-bomb,” the British paper went on, Israeli scientists are trying to exploit medical advances by identifying distinctive genes carried by some Arabs, and then create a genetically modified bacterium or virus. The goal is to use the ability of viruses and certain bacteria to alter the DNA inside the host’s living cells. The scientists are trying to engineer deadly microorganisms that attack only those bearing the distinctive genes.

The secret Israel program is based at the Institute for Biological Research in Nes Tsiona, a small town southeast of Tel Aviv, the main research facility for Israel’s clandestine arsenal of chemical and biological weapons.

(Source–>http://ironlight.wordpress.com/2010/04/21/israels-ethno-biological-weapons/)

–=–

The price of this Jewish supremacy, racism, arrogance, lies, and torture?

Self-destruction…

As printed at the Salem-News.com:

“(TEL AVIV / SALEM) – Israel’s population is facing a dire threat: a drastic depopulation, from the use of weapons that leave behind Depleted Uranium (DU). Depleted Uranium leads to the word Omnicidal, as DU kills everything in the food chain, everywhere the wind blows. Experts say the dramatic drop in Israel’s sperm count could eliminate their ability to reproduce.

Research by an Israeli doctor shows a significant drop in sperm count level and sperm motility among young Israeli soldiers in recent years. Sperm motility is the ability of sperm to move properly toward an egg.

It is attributed to the inhalation of DU aerosolized nano-particles; the dirty results of extra powerful weapons used by Israel and the U.S.

All of that military might as it turns out, could set the stage for a massive Israeli act of population suicide.

A study by Dr. Ronit Haimov-Kokhman released in November, showed a 40-percent decline in the concentration of sperm cells in Israeli sperm donors from 2004 to 2008, compared to samples taken between 1995 and 1999.

Sperm banks in Israel are now reportedly turning away as many as two-thirds of potential donors, due to the low-quality sperm. In the past, around one-third of the potential donors were turned away…”

–=–

In the name of genocide and depopulation of the Palestinian/Arab/Semitic peoples by Zionism and Israel, including the unleashed power of the United States military as its useful idiot for which it holds the reigns, I offer my heartfelt grief, sorrow, and regret that my own people remain complacent and weak. And though I know it is my blood enemy, I am saddened at this God-sent and ironic justice being delivered upon the Ashkenazim carpetbaggers who have occupied, stolen, and killed Palestine and her people.

But we are talking about the international Jewish problem, so let’s continue with the rest of the world…

–=–

–=–


Peru – Former President Alejandro Toledo, World Jewish Congress

File:2008 World Jewish Congress Delegation meets with Polish PM Donald Tusk.jpg
Poland – World Jewish Congress Delegation meets with
Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk in Warsaw, June 2008


Poland – Prime Minister Donald Tusk at Western Wall

Donald Tusk at Wailing Wall


Poland – President Lech Kaczynski


Portugal – Jose Barrosso


European Union – Jose Barrosso is now the
appointed President of the “European Commission”
European People’s Party (EPP)


European Union – Jose Barrosso


European Parliament President Hans-Gert Poettering
with chief rabbi of Tel Aviv, Yisrael Meir Lau


European Commission President Romano Prodi


Portugal – President Aníbal Cavaco Silva, at the Lisbon synagogue


Portugal – President Jorge Sampaio, Lisbon synagogue


Russia – President Dmitry Medvedev

http://i1.wp.com/www.loonwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/putin_yarmulke.jpg?resize=340%2C311
Russian prime minister Vladimir Putin

Putin at Moscow's Jewish Museum.

–=–
Putin On Russia’s Jewish Bolshevism Government
–=–

Haaretz reports:

“Russian President Vladimir Putin said that at least 80 percent of the members of the first Soviet government were Jewish.

“I thought about something just now: The decision to nationalize this library was made by the first Soviet government, whose composition was 80-85 percent Jewish,” Putin said June 13 during a visit to Moscow’s Jewish Museum and Tolerance Center.

Putin was referencing the library of Rabbi Joseph I. Schneerson, the late leader of the Chabad-Lubavitch movement. The books, which are claimed by Chabad representatives in the United States, began being moved to the museum in Moscow this month.

According to the official transcription of Putin’s speech at the museum, he went on to say that the politicians on the predominantly Jewish Soviet government “were guided by false ideological considerations and supported the arrest and repression of Jews, Russian Orthodox Christians, Muslims and members of other faiths. They grouped everyone into the same category.

“Thankfully, those ideological goggles and faulty ideological perceptions collapsed. And today, we are essentially returning these books to the Jewish community with a happy smile.”

Widely seen as the first Soviet government, the Council of People’s Commissars was formed in 1917 and comprised 16 leaders, including chairman Vladimir Lenin, foreign affairs chief Leon Trotsky and Joseph Stalin, who was in charge of the People’s Commissariat of Nationalities.”

(Source–>http://www.haaretz.com/jewish-world/jewish-world-news/putin-first-soviet-government-was-mostly-jewish-1.530857)

–=–


Serbia – President Boris Tadic visiting Israel


South Africa – former South African President Nelson Mandela with Gill Marcus and
Professor Michael Katz, President of the South African Jewish Board of Deputies (SAJBD).
African National Congress, December 1990


South Africa – (top) Nelson Mandela and Jewish Communist leader Joe Slovo.
(bottom) – NAACP President Kivie Kaplan posing with Martin Luther King Jr.


South Africa – President Jacob Zuma meets with Irwin Cotler,
former Canadian Justice Minister and Jewish community activist.

File:JoseMariaAznarWorldJewishCongress2010.jpg
Spain – Former Spanish Prime Minister Jose Maria Aznar addressing
a meeting of the World Jewish Congress in Jerusalem, 1 September 2010


Spain – Former Prime Minister (1996 to 2004) José María Aznar
attends a meeting of the World Jewish Congress in Israel 2010


Spain – José María Aznar at pro-Israeli lobby group AIPAC


Sweden – Prime Minister Göran Persson


Sweden – Prime Minister Göran Persson


Tibet – Buddhist chief Dalai Lama at Wailing Wall

Tibet – Dalai Lama


United Kindom – Foreign Minister David Miliband


United Kingdom – Jewish Foreign Minister David Miliband


UK – Prime Minister David Cameron in Yad Vashem, Israel


United Kingdom – Prime Minister Tony Blair

File:Tony Blair - Jerusalem - June 2011.jpg
International Quartet Envoy and former British Prime Minister Tony Blair
addressing a gathering of the World Jewish Congress in Jerusalem

http://i0.wp.com/www.loonwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/brown_yarmulke.jpg?resize=253%2C400
United Kingdom – Prime Ministers Tony Blair, Gordon Brown


United Kingdom – Prime Minister Gordon Brown in Yad Vashem, Israel


United Nations – Secretary-General Kofi Annan and his wife Nane
(from the Swedish Wallenberg Jewish finance family)


United States
(See Below)


Venezuela – President Hugo Chavez

–=–
The Vatican
–=–


Vatican City
Catholic???


Pope Benedict XVI at the Wailing Wall


Vatican – Pope Benedict XVI Ratzinger


Pope John Paul II at the Wailing Wall


Vatican – Pope John Paul II


Vatican – Pope John Paul II


Pope Benedict XVI Ratzinger

File:1993 Maria Celli-Riegner-Beilin-Vatican-Israel-Relations.jpg
World Jewish Congress leader Gerhart M. Riegner (center) witnesses formal
establishment of diplomatic relations between the Holy See, represented by
Monsignor Claudio Maria Celli (left), and Israel, represented by
Deputy Foreign Minister Yossi Beilin.


Pope John Paul II visits Yad Vashem Holocaust Centre in Israel

https://i2.wp.com/media.israelhayom.co.il/2011/10/02/131754913679963684a_b.jpg
Rabbi Yisrael Meir Lau, chief rabbi of Tel Aviv
A.K.A. “Everybody’s Rabbi”


France – Jewish Cardinal Aaron Jean-Marie Lustiger embracing Rabbi Sirat


Evangelical leader Pat Robertson delivers a speech to a crowd of mostly
evangelical Christians from various nations on a pilgrimage to Israel, 2004.

–=–

–=–

***A Note to Christians***

If ever there was or will be an “anti-Christ” (not to mention one that loves to brag about its responsibility in killing Christ and that He is now boiling in excrement in some place like hell), it is surely right before your eyes – in the form of the international organized Zionist Jew. Isn’t it time to become Christian soldiers and defeat this biblical enemy instead of becoming Friends Of Israel and part of the Christian/Jewish Alliance? How can total and complete enemies be in such an unholy partnership? The Holy Bible is full of violence, which I was fooled into thinking was all a bad thing thanks to Jewish manipulation. Now I realize that it is time for Christians to take the lessons and allegory of the Bible to heart, for violence is a natural biblical response to the purposeful destruction of your species, your values, your families, and your way of life. Will you truly allow the Synagogue of Satan – less than 2% of the U.S. population – to rule you and demoralize and murder your children without a fight?

Jewish comedy at your expense…
They are laughing at you and your “other cheek”.

–=–
The United States
Corruption At all levels
–=–

Video: 300 U.S. Congressmen sign pledge of Allegiance to Israel

Video: Cynthia McKinney refuses to sign a pledge to Israel…
is politically ostracized, redistricted, and loses her office

–=–
The Presidents
–=–


Must Watch Video:
The quad-annual migration of presidential candidates to Israel

–=–

“While only a tiny proportion of the US population is Jewish,
94(%) of Jews live in 13 key electoral college states,
which combined have enough electors to elect the president.”
–World Jewish Congress
(Source–>http://www.worldjewishcongress.org/en/communities/show?id=72)

–=–


President Obama (2009-2017?)


President Obama at the Wailing Wall


President Obama at Yad Vashem, Israel

Bush at the Wailing Wall


President George W. Bush

President Bill Clinton (1993-2001)


Bill and Hillary

–=–

“We Jews have put issue upon issue to the American people.
Then we promote both sides of the issue as confusion reigns.
With their eye’s fixed on the issues, they fail to see who is behind every scene.
We Jews toy with the American public as a cat toys with a mouse…”
“Americans have not had a presidential choice since 1932.
Roosevelt was our man; every president since Roosevelt has been our man.”

– (Harold Wallace Rosenthal)

Roosevelt Labor's ChoiceAn issue of the Yiddish socialist daily, the Forward, endorsed Roosevelt
on the cover of its November 1, 1936, rotogravure section.
In 1936, Roosevelt garnered 85 percent of the Jewish vote.
Note the support of the Jewish run “Labor” unions.

Stop Your Cruel Oppression of the Jews
“In this print, which appeared after a 1905 pogrom in Kishinev, a “Russian Jew” carries on his back a large bundle labeled “Oppression;” hanging from the bundle are weights labeled “Autocracy,” “Robbery,” “Cruelty,” “Assassination,” “Deception,” and “Murder.” In the background, on the right, a Jewish community burns, while in the upper left corner, President Theodore Roosevelt asks the Emperor of Russia, Nicholas II, “Now that you have peace without, why not remove his burden and have peace within your borders?”
(Source–>http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/haventohome/haven-home.html)

Giant Mass Meeting sponsored by the Trade Union Council and New York City Committee of the Jewish People, September 18, 1941
The dual-sided English-Yiddish broadside – rally supporting President Franklin Roosevelt
and his “policy of all aid to Great Britain, the Soviet Union, and China,” in 1941,
sponsored by the Jewish Peoples Committee, a pro-communist organization.
David Dubinsky, president of the International Ladies Garment Union, declined to attend this
September 18, 1941, rally because he viewed the sponsoring group as Communist controlled.
(Source–>http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/haventohome/haven-home.html)

https://i2.wp.com/www.loc.gov/exhibits/haventohome/images/hh0170s.jpg
Hebrew Prayer for Roosevelt and Churchill
This hand-drawn plaque includes dual Hebrew prayers for Winston Churchill and
Franklin Roosevelt.  The one for Roosevelt, based on the traditional Jewish prayer
for the government, reads: “[May He] who gives salvation to President Roosevelt,
[He] whose kingdom is everlasting, protect, and increase, and raise up all of the officials
of America, and [may] the King of Kings lift them up and lengthen their days in office.”


“V for Vendetta” was a Jewish creation with Jewish writers and actors
that promotes the false paradigm of a vendetta for the holocaust,
as most movies do.


Zionist Congress: Join the British Army for Victory.
(Translated) “We will fight them where-ever we meet them, and we will hit them
Hard and Often, until this scourge is driven from the Earth” –Sir Winston Churchill.
Unite with the British to defeat the Nazis. Jewish enlisting is important
in giving the support of the Zionists in the Jewish Agency.

File:V-E-Day Stars and Stripes No 285 Paris 8 May 1945.JPG
This is the real Ashkenazim V for Victory, commonly called VE-Day
(Victory in Europe Day)

–=–

Note that Roosevelt and Churchhill (and all past U.S. Presidents and Prime Ministers)
are royal blood cousins with the Kings and Queens of England;
here genealogically chronicled by the Mormon “Church” :
https://realitybloger.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/3ee75-howlandpedigree.jpg

–=–
Abraham Lincoln-stein
–=–

Isachar Zacharie (1827-1900) to Abraham Lincoln
“English born Isachar Zacharie was President Lincoln’s chiropodist, political confidante, and special emissary. Among other things, Zacharie involved himself in helping Abraham Lincoln secure the Jewish vote. In a letter to Lincoln on November 3, 1864, Zacharie wrote: “I just returned to this city after a trip of nine days through Pennsylvania and New York state, and I am happy to inform you, that I am satisfied that I have done much good, I now think all is Right . . . . As regards the Isrelites [sic]–with but few Exceptions, they will vote for you. . . . I understand them well, and have taken the precaution–to see that they do as they have promised–I have secured good and trustworthy men to–attend on them on Election Day–My Men have been all the week seeing that their masses are properly Registered–so that all will go right on the 8th ins.”

(Source–>http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/haventohome/haven-home.html)

–=–

“Lincoln was the first President to make it possible for rabbis to serve as military chaplains by signing the 1862 Act of Congress which changed the law that had barred all but Christian clergymen from the role. It all started on September 8, 1861, when a 30-year-old Philadelphia cantor, Michael Mitchell Allen, returned to his encampment with the 65th Regiment of the Fifth Pennsylvania Cavalry, known as Cameron’s Dragoons. The regiment of 1,200 men, mostly Jews, elected him their chaplain. Complaints flew up the military ladder. Lincoln, then signed the Act, and Jewish chaplains have been serving in the American Armed Forces ever since.

He was also the first, and happily, the only President who was called upon to revoke an official act of anti-Semitism by the U.S. government. He canceled General Ulysses S Grant’s “Order No. 11” expelling all Jews from Tennessee from the district controlled by his armies during the Civil War. (Grant denied personal responsibility for this act attributing it to his subordinate.)

Shortly after delivering the Emancipation Proclamation, Lincoln met Canadian Christian Zionist, Henry Wentworth Monk, who expressed hope that Jews who were being oppressed in Russia and Turkey be emancipated “by restoring them to their national home in Palestine.” Lincoln replied this was “a noble dream and one shared by many Americans.”…

In his study of American Jewry and the Civil War (Philadelphia, 1951), Bertram W. Korn writes that in the eulogy Rabbi Isaac M. Wise delivered after Lincoln’s assassination, he said: “The lamented Abraham Lincoln believed himself to be bone from our bone and flesh from our flesh. He supposed himself to be a descendant of Hebrew parentage. He said so in my presence.”

Ever since, speculation has been rife. Google “Abraham Lincoln Jewish” and a plethora of articles appear…

The “Case for Jewish Lincoln”:

1. His close friendships with prominent Jews, along with his pro-Jewish policies.

2. While Lincoln never professed belonging to a specific faith, he would often refer to his beliefs citing the 20th chapter of the Book of Exodus – the Ten Commandments.

3. His name was Abraham. His great-grandfather was named Mordechai.

4. His ancestors came from the town of Lincoln in eastern England, established in 1159, it has an interesting Jewish history. During Crusader riots, the Sheriff of Lincoln and the Bishop of London saved the Jews by giving them official protection and taught love of Jews to parishioners. It’s been postulated that when the Jews were ordered out of England, Abraham Lincoln’s ancestors may have been Conversos.

5. When Lincoln was assassinated, Jewish communities sat Shiva. Rabbis around the country eulogized the fallen President.

6. Lincoln was described as having Sephardic features.”

(Source–>http://www.aish.com/j/f/Abraham_Lincoln_and_the_Jews.html)

–=–

“The Melungeon DNA Surname Project by Dr. Elizabeth Hirschman and Dr. Donald Panther Yates state that Abraham Lincoln was of Jewish ancestry. Dr. Hirschman writes “The DNA sample we have came from a Berry male from Tennessee whose ancestors had arrived in Virginia. The marriage of Abraham Lincoln’s parents was performed in the home of a Berry (and not a church) suggesting that not only the Lincolns, but also the Berry’s were of Jewish descent. We believe that many of the very earliest settlers who came to North America from England were actually Sephardic Jews.”

(Source–>http://www.melungeons.com/articles/mar2005.htm)

–=–

This presents an interesting dilemma, as again we must acknowledge the bloodline lineage of all presidents as cousins of George Washington. Abraham Lincoln is listed, among others, as:

7th cousin, 7 times removed from Barack Obama
7th cousin, 5 times removed from George W. Bush
7th cousin 4 times removed from Gerald Ford
11th cousin, 3 times removed from Mitt Romney
13th cousin 3 times removed from George Washington
14th cousin 2 times removed from Robert E. Lee
14th cousin 5 times removed from Thomas Jefferson
15th cousin 4 times removed from William Henry Harrison via Edward I King of England
17th cousin 2 times removed from John Quincy Adams via Edward I King of England
17th cousin 2 times removed from Benjamin Harrison via Edward I King of England
18th cousin 1 time removed from Theodore Roosevelt via Edward I King of England
19th cousin from Franklin Roosevelt via Edward I King of England
20th cousin from John Forbes Kerry
31st great-grandson of Alfred The Great (King of the Anglo-Saxons)
34th great-grandson of Emperor Charlemagne

“According to Burke’s Presidential Families of the United States, Abraham Lincoln is a direct descendant of King Edward I Plantagenet (1239-1307) of England… The genealogical chart shown below traces Lincoln’s line from Edward I (top left) down through Lincoln’s mother, Nancy [Hanks] Lincoln (1784-1818), a family that had its American beginnings in the Philadelphia area but later migrated to Virginia and Kentucky… the aforementioned book… describes other interesting royal connections to American presidents – namely, George Washington as descended from King Henry III (1207-1272); George Washington from King Edward I (1239-1307); Thomas Jefferson from David I, King of Scott (1080-1153); James Monroe from Edward III (1312-1377); John Quincy Adams from Edward I (1239-1307); Ulysses Grant from David I, King of Scots (1080-1153); and, although he was not a president, the genealogical connection of Robert E. Lee to Queen Elizabeth II.  There is also a connection with a more recent president, Richard M. Nixon, and King Edward III, although in that case, the claim goes through an “illegitimate” (but “biological”) offspring, Eleanor Holland, who was born around 1405… Abraham Lincoln can not only be connected as a cousin to the aforementioned presidents and Robert E. Lee, but also to Queen Victoria…”

Remember the chart above listing the Kingdom of Jerusalem as a Plantagenet family claim?

–=–

Abraham LincolnTom Hanks
Lincoln was born on February 12, 1809 to Thomas Lincoln and Nancy Hanks.
Tom Hanks is of the bloodline as most prominent actors are,
being 3rd cousin, 4 times removed of Abe Lincoln.

–=–

According to Ancestry.com, George Clooney is the half-first cousin five times removed from Lincoln, the 16th president. The genealogy website breaks down the connection, explaining the “half” means that two of their ancestors were half-siblings –  Lincoln’s mother Nancy Hanks was the half-sister of Clooney’s 4th great-grandmother Mary Ann Sparrow.

And Hollywood continues to promote a Jewish historical perspective without ever revealing this inconvenient genealogical relationship of its actors turned directors and writers. Steven Spielberg’s new movie Lincoln, for example, should be watched or re-watched with these facts in mind…

So at what point do we distinguish the royal blood from the Ashkenazim “Jewish” blood? Can it be distinguished, if most actors, presidents, congressmen, Supreme Court justices, and corporate CEO’s and founders are labeled as both cousins of royal blood and as “Jewish”? Is it not clear this the distinction is not racial or religious, but must be considered as blood-based? A shared psychopathic blood without the imposition of empathy – one blood to rule them all…

Sources:

http://www.familyforest.com/Kerry_Bush_Cousins.html
http://usspost.com/abraham-lincoln-seventh-cousin-five-times-removed-george-w-bush-69662/
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2207331/How-Tom-Hanks-related-Abraham-Lincoln-presidents-mother.html
http://famouskin.com/_abraham_lincoln_famous_kin.php
http://civilwar.gratzpa.org/2012/12/best-of-2012-the-royal-ancestry-of-president-abraham-lincoln/

–=–

https://i1.wp.com/www.loc.gov/exhibits/haventohome/images/hh0196s.jpg
President Grant Makes a Contribution to Congregation Adas Israel

Adas Israel was the first synagogue building built in the District of Columbia and is closely linked with the beginnings of Jewish life in Washington. President Ulysses S. Grant and other federal and civic officials attended the dedication ceremony on June 9, 1876. Shown here is an official receipt from the Adas Israel “Hebrew” Congregation to the president acknowledging his ten-dollar contribution. In 1969, to make way for Washington’s subway, the first Adas Israel building (which had not functioned as a synagogue since 1907), was moved from its original location at 6th and G Street, N.W., to 3rd and G Street, N.W., where it currently houses the Lillian and Albert Small Jewish Museum and the Jewish Historical Society of Greater Washington.

–=–
The Vice Presidents
–=–


Vice President Joe Biden

“You make up 11 percent of the seats in the United States Congress. You make up one-third of all Nobel laureates… The embrace of immigration” is part of that, as is the involvement of Jews in social justice movements… You can’t talk about the civil rights movement in this country without talking about Jewish freedom riders and Jack Greenberg,” he said, telling a story about seeing a group of Jewish activists at a segregated movie theater in Delaware. “You can’t talk about the women’s movement without talking about Betty Friedan” or American advances in science and technology without mentioning Einstein and Carl Sagan, or music and Gershwin, Bob Dylan and “so, so, so many other people…Think behind of all that, I bet you 85 percent of those changes, whether it’s in Hollywood or social media are a consequence of Jewish leaders in the industry. The influence is immense, the influence is immense. And, I might add, it is all to the good… Jews have also been key to the evolution of American jurisprudence, he continued, namedropping Brandeis, Fortas, Frankfurter, Cardozo, Ginsberg, Breyer, Kagan. You literally can’t. You can’t talk about the recognition of… rights in the Constitution without looking at these incredible jurists that we’ve had.”

–Vice President Joe Biden’s speech for Jewish Heritage Month,
which concerned some Jews as too historically honest


Vice President Joe Biden


Joe Biden with Israeli presidents Netanyahu and Peres


Former Vice President Dick Cheney with Lubavitchers.

–=–
The Executive Cabinet
–=–

Former White House Chief of Staff Rahm (Israel) Emanuel
Now Mayor of Chicago… Always a duel-Israeli/U.S. citizen


Hillary Clinton – First Lady, Senator, and Cheif of Staff


U.S. Chief of Staff Joshua Bolten,


Former U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Stuart Eizenstat

–=–
The Governors
–=–

Governor Jeb Bush (Florida)
meets with Zionist Lubavitch Movement

Governor Mit Romney (Massachusetts)
And at the Wailing wall below

Governor George Pataki (New York), Lubavitcher “Award” ceremony.
by picture of the ultra-racist “Rebbe” [i.e. “Teacher”] in the background).
Also speaking: Hillary Clinton
Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger (California)

Governor Rod Blagojevich flanked by Members of the
Jewish Supremacist Lubavitch Movement

Governor Mike Huckabee with Israeli P.M. Netanyahu
–=–
The Mayors
–=–

“By July, The Three Biggest U.S. Cities Will Have Jewish Mayors”

–Tablet Magazine, May 22, 2013


New Los Angeles Jewish Mayor Eric Garcetti debating on the
Jewish media against a ‘goy’. Hardly seems fair…


Los Angeles Mayor-elect Eric Garcetti attended Beth Chayim Chadashim’s (BCC)
annual awards brunch on June 2 and presented the 2013 Rabbi Erwin and
Agnes Herman Humanitarian Award to BCC honoree David Codell.


Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg (New York)


Former Mayor Giuliani celebrating the Rebbe’ Schneerson


Mayor of New York, Ed Koch meeting with racist Rebbe

Bob Filner on Election Night.
Bob Filner, Jewish Mayor of San Diego


Raum Emanuel, Mayor of Chicago
Former Obama Chief of Staff
Duel citizen of Israel

–=–
The Congress
–=–

 “If Democrats take the House, we’re going to see a huge influx” of Jewish lawmakers,
said Ira Forman, the executive director of the National Jewish Democratic Council.
‘But even on a disappointing night, I think we’ll see a few more Jewish Democrats in the House.’
(Source: http://forward.com/articles/4693/a-tribe-of-candidates-leads-drive-to-retake-house/)

https://i2.wp.com/www.loc.gov/exhibits/haventohome/images/hh0167b_p1s.jpg
“Displayed here are a variety of buttons, stickers, and other election related memorabilia
offering a snapshot of Jewish participation in the political process as members of Congress.”


Senator McCain at the Wailing Wall


Senator Joseph Lieberman with award from “Friends of Lubavitch”


House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer (Left) and
House Speaker John Boehner (Right) with chabads.


Newt Gingrich


Congressman Newt Gingrich, Speaker of the U.S. House

–=–
The Middle Management
–=–

I could go on and on and on but…

–=–
Oh Wait!
We forgot Iran…

–=–

Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (R) speaks as Rabbi Moshe Ber Beck of
Neturei Karta, a fringe Ultra-Orthodox movement within the anti-Zionist bloc,
listens during a meeting in New York, September 24, 2008.
REUTERS/Brendan McDermid (UNITED STATES)


Anti-Zionist Orthodox Jewish Rabbis meet with Irans President Ahmadinejad, 2006

https://i2.wp.com/www.vosizneias.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/ahm6-725x520.jpg

A rabbi from the fringe group Jews United Against Zionism embraces Iranian President and Holocaust denier Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
Rabbi Yisroel Dovid Weiss, anti-Zionist leader of Netrurei Karta

“Why on earth would a rabbi from New York travel to Tehran to embrace
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, a man who says
the Holocaust never happened and that Israel should be annihilated?”
–Fox News article, 2006

The answer?

Rabbi Yisroel Dovid Weiss led the Neturei Karta (New York) delegation
to Iran’s capital on Dec. 11 to participate in a two-day
conference on whether the Holocaust occurred.

–=–

“Zionism is a fundamentally heretical movement which
denies the Divine imperative
that Jews remain in exile until the day
when all mankind will be miraculously redeemed…”

–Weiss told a gathering of protesters in New York City in November, 2006.


Ahmadinejad attends the International Conference on
Global Alliance against Terrorism for a Just Peace in Iran
May 14th, 2011

–=–

Anti-Zionist?

Ahhh… no wonder Iran is on the international Jew and Israel’s shit list!

For Zionism is the blind support of the illegal State of Israel…

–=–

Iranian vice president Mohammad Reza Rahimi publicly stated that
the Talmud teaches how to destroy non-Jews and that
80% of America’s wealth is in the hands of 6% of the world’s Jewish population.

–=–

President of Iran Ahmadinejad meets Jewish Rabbis in NYC, September 2012.

–=–

“There is today a lot of oppression, which a large portion of this is due
to the Zionist. The occupying of Palestine is just a part of this injustice.
But the bigger wrong  is that they are calling themselves Jews and
they justify their horrendous actions  in the name of Judaism”.

–Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
, to anti-Zionist Rabbi Beck
In New York City, September 27, 2012

–=–

“We  are impressed with Your Excellency’s concern and care for the
Jewish community,  a fact that we personally have experienced during our visits in Iran.
We have  visited the Jewish old-age home, the Jewish hospital and we have seen
the Matzo bakery which is a necessity for Jewish people. Also it is well-known that the
Jewish community is represented by its own member of parliament, despite the fact that
the Jewish community does not have the number of constituents
required to have a parliament representative.”

–Senior Rabbi Moshe Dov Beck to Ahmadinejad,
–In New York City, September 27, 2012

–=–

Amongst the issues discussed, the Rabbi stated: “There are many many Jews  worldwide including in occupied Palestine, who are against the whole concept of Zionism and totally in opposition to the State of Israel”. The  rabbi praised the President for his understanding the difference between  Judaism and Zionism. “We  would like to laud Your Excellency for understanding to differentiate between Judaism and Zionism, between good and evil.”

–Senior Rabbi Moshe Dov Beck to Ahmadinejad,
–New York, September 27, 2012

–=–
So Who’s Jew?
–=–

“These Eastern European Jews have neither a racial nor a historic connection
with Palestine. Their ancestors were not inhabitants of the Promised Land.
They are the direct descendants of the people of the Khazar Kingdom.
The Khazars were a non-Semitic, Turko-Mongolian tribe.”

–Mr. Benjamin Freedman, a Jewish industrialist born in New York,

from Economic Council Letter published October 15, 1947

–=–

“Mr. Freedman was challenged, unwisely, by a Zionist objector;
he invited his challenger to go with him to the Jewish room
of the New York Public Library. There they could together examine the
Jewish Encyclopedia volume I pp. 1-12, and the published works of
Graetz, Dubnow, Friedlander, Raisin and many other noted Jewish historians,
which, as well as other non-Jewish authorities,
“establish the fact beyond all possible doubt”.’

–Somewhere South of Suez (1950) Pg 349-350

–=–

“Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a ‘Jew’
or to call a contemporary Jew an Israelite or a Hebrew.”

— “A brief History of the Terms for Jew”, 1980 Jewish Almanac, page 3

–=–

“Khazar, an ancient Turkic speaking people who ruled a large and powerful
state in the steppes North of the Caucasus Mountains from the 7th century
to their demise in the mid 11th century A.D… In the 8th Century it’s
political and religious head… as well as the greater part of the Khazar nobility,
abandoned paganism and converted to Judaism… .”

Encyclopedia Americana (1985)

–=–

“Khazars, confederation of Turkic and Iranian tribes that established a
major commercial empire in the second half of the 6th century,
covering the southeastern section of modern European Russia… |
In the middle of the 8th century the ruling classes adopted Judaism as their religion.”

–Encyclopedia Britannica (15th edition)

–=–

 “Khazars, a non-Semitic, Asiatic, Mongolian tribal nation who emigrated into
Eastern Europe about the first century, who were converted as an entire nation to
Judaism in the seventh century by the expanding Russian nation
which absorbed the entire Khazar population, and who account for the
presence in Eastern Europe of the great numbers of Yiddish-speaking
Jews in Russia, Poland, Lithuania, Galatia, Besserabia and Rumania.”

–The Jewish Encyclopedia

–=–

 “Khazars, a national group of general Turkic type, independent and sovereign in
Eastern Europe between the seventh and tenth centuries C.E.
During part of this time the leading Khazars professed Judaism…
In spite of the negligible information of an archaeological nature,
the presence of Jewish groups and the impact of Jewish ideas in Eastern Europe
are considerable during the Middle Ages. Groups have been mentioned as migrating
to Central Europe from the East often have been referred to as Khazars,
thus making it impossible to overlook the possibility that they originated
from within the former Khazar Empire.”

–The Encyclopedia Judaica (1972)

–=–

“Ashkenazim, the Ashkenazim are one of the two major
divisions of the Jews, the other being the Shephardim.”

–Academic American Encyclopedia (1985)

–=–

“Ashkenazim, the Ashkenazim are the Jews whose ancestors lived in
German lands… it was among Ashkenazi Jews that the idea of political Zionism
emerged, leading ultimately to the establishment of the state of Israel…
In the late 1960s, Ashkenazi Jews numbered some 11 million,
about 84 percent of the world Jewish population.”

–Encyclopedia Americana (1985)

–=–

 “The primary meaning of Ashkenaz and Ashkenazim in Hebrew is
Germany and Germans. This may be due to the fact that the home of
the ancient ancestors of the Germans is Media, which is the Biblical Ashkenaz…
Krauss is of the opinion that in the early medieval ages
the Khazars were sometimes referred to as Ashkenazim…
About 92 percent of all Jews or approximately 14,500,000 are Ashkenazim.”

–The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia

–=–

Khazars {kah’z-ars} The Khazars, a Turkic people, created a commercial and
political empire that dominated substantial parts of South Russia during much of
the 7th through 10th centuries. During the 8th century the Khazar aristocracy and the
kagan (king) were converted to Judaism. The Khazars established their capital at
Itil (or Atil), in the Volga delta, and for four centuries thereafter this Jewish empire held
the balance of power between the Christian Byzantine Empire and the Muslim Caliphate.
The fortified Khazar city of Sarkil on the lower Don River was built with Byzantine help
and served as a crossroads to central Asia. The Khazars controlled many of the trade
routes to the Orient; some of the Radhanites (Jewish merchants from Gaul), for example,
were accustomed to crossing the Khazar empire while traveling to and from China and
India. During the late 10th and early 11th centuries an alliance of Byzantines and
Russians broke the power of the Khazars in the Crimea. In 965, Svyatoslav I,
duke  of Kiev, decisively defeated the Khazar army. Further to the east new
waves of Turkic invadersoverran the remains of the Khazar state.

–New Grolier Encyclopedia

–=–

“It is highly probable that the bulk of the Jew’s ancestors ‘never’ lived in
Palestine ‘at all,’ which witnesses the power of historical assertion over fact.”

–‘The Outline of History’ by H. G. Wells:

–=–

“Now these are the generations of the sons of Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth: and unto
them were sons born after the flood. The sons of Japheth;…the sons of Gomer; Ashkenaz…”

–The Bible (Genesis 10:1-3)

–=–

“Without a complete and accurate knowledge of the origin and history of the
‘Jews’ in Eastern Europe… it is quite impossible for [Christians] to intelligently
understand the harmful influence the Jews have exerted for ten centuries…’
My many years of intensive research established beyond the question of any doubt,
contrary to the generally accepted belief held by Christians, that the ‘Jews’ in
Eastern Europe at any time in their history in Eastern Europe were never the
legendary ‘lost ten tribes’ of Bible lore. That historic fact is incontrovertible.
Relentless research established as equally true that the ‘Jews’ in Eastern Europe
at no time in their history could be correctly regarded as the direct lineal descendants
of the legendary ‘lost ten tribes’ of Bible lore. The ‘Jews’ in Eastern Europe in modern
history cannot legitimately point to a single ancient ancestor who ever
set even a foot on the soil of Palestine in the era of Bible history…
Research also revealed that the ‘Jews’ in Eastern Europe were never ‘Semites,’
are not ‘Semites’ now, nor can they ever be regarded as ‘Semites’ at any future time
by any stretch of the imagination. Exhaustive research also irrevocably rejects as a
fantastic fabrication the generally accepted belief by Christians that the ‘Jews’ in
Eastern Europe are the legendary ‘Chosen People’ so very vocally publicized
by the Christian clergy from their pulpits…”

–‘Facts Are Facts’, by Benjamin Freedman

–=–

“In the year 740 A.D. the Khazars were officially converted to Judaism.
A century later they were crushed by the incoming Slavic-speaking people and
were scattered over central Europe where they were known as Jews.”

–The American Peoples Encyclopedia, 1954

–=–

“Chazars [Khazars]: A people of Turkish origin whose life and history are interwoven
with the very beginnings of the history of the Jews of Russia. The kingdom of the
Chazars was firmly established in most of South Russia long before the foundation
of the Russian monarchy by the Varangians (855)…
Jews have lived on the shores of the Black and Caspian seas since the first centuries
of the common era [after the death of Christ]. Historical evidence points to the region
of the Ural as the home of the Chazars. Among the classical writers of the Middle Ages
they were known as the ‘Chozars,’ ‘Khazirs,’ ‘Akatzirs,’ and ‘Akatirs,’ and in the
Russian chronicles as ‘Khwalisses’ and ‘Ugry Byelyye.’…”

Jewish Encyclopedia, 3rd Edition, 1925

–=–

“Khazars, a national group of general Turkic type, independent and sovereign in
Eastern Europe between the seventh and tenth centuries A.D.
During part of this time the leading Khazars professed Judaism.”

–The Encyclopedia Judaica, Vol. 10, (1971)

–=–

“Khazars, a medieval people, probably related to the VolgaBulgars, whose
ruling class adopted Judaism during the 8th cent. The Khazars seem to have
emerged during the 6th cent., from the vast nomadic Hun (Turki) empire which
stretched from the steppes of Eastern Europe and the Volga basin to the Chinese frontier.
Although it is often claimed that allusions to the Khazars are found as early as 200 C.E.,
actually they are not mentioned until 627… Most Jewish Historians date the
conversion of the Khazar King to Judaism during the first half of this century {A.D.}…”

–The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia

–=–

“This, of course, is inspired by the story of the Covenant in Genesis; and it implies
that the Khazars too claimed the status of a Chosen Race, who made their own Covenant
with the Lord, even though they [Khazars] were not descended from Abraham’s seed…
He cannot, and does not, claim for them [the Khazars] Semitic descent, he traces their
[Khazars] ancestry not to Shem, but to Noah’s third son, Japheth or more precisely
to Japheth’s grandson, Togarma, the ancestor of all Turkish tribes…
We have found in the family registers of our fathers,’ Joseph asserts boldly,
‘that Togarma had ten sons, and the names of their offspring are as follows:
Uigur, Dursu, Avars, Huns, Basilii, Tarniakh, Khazars, Zagora, Bulgars, Sabir.
We [Khazars] are the sons of Khazar, the seventh…'”

–The Thirteenth Tribe, (Jewish author) Arthur Koestler, pages 58-82

–=–

(Source for some of the above quotes–>http://www.iamthewitness.com/doc/Ashkenazis.are.not.the.descendants.of.the.Ancient.Israelites.htm)

–=–

Just in Europe and Russia alone, the (Khazarian) Zionist Jews have been banished over 47 times in the last 1000 years (not including this last century):

Mainz, 1012 – France, 1182 – Upper Bavaria, 1276 – England, 1290 – France, 1306 – France, 1322 – Saxony, 1349 – Hungary, 1360 – Belgium, 1370 – Slovakia, 1380 – France, 1394 – Austria, 1420 – Lyons, 1420 – Cologne, 1424 – Mainz, 1438 – Augsburg, 1438 – Upper Bavaria, 1442 – Netherlands, 1444 – Brandenburg, 1446 – Mainz, 1462 – Mainz, 1483 – Warsaw, 1483 – Spain, 1492 – Italy, 1492 – Lithuania, 1495 – Portugal, 1496 – Naples, 1496 – Navarre, 1498 – Nuremberg, 1498 – Brandenburg, 1510 – Prussia, 1510 – Genoa, 1515 – Naples, 1533 – Italy, 1540 – Naples, 1541 – Prague, 1541 – Genoa, 1550 – Bavaria, 1551 – Prague, 1557 – Papal States, 1569 – Hungary, 1582 – Hamburg, 1649 – Vienna, 1669 – Slovakia, 1744 –  Moravia, 1744 – Bohemia, 1744 – Moscow, 1891.

—Excerpted from “The Synagogue of Satan” by Andrew Carrington Hitchcock. This was not the end, as we all know from recent history.

–=–

“It can hardly be an accident that antagonism directed against the Jews is to be found pretty much everywhere in the world where Jews and non-Jews are associated. And as the Jews are the common element of the situation it would seem probable, on the face of it, that the cause will be found in them rather than in the widely varying groups which feel this antagonism.”

Professor Jesse H. Holmes, writing in “The American Hebrew”.

–=–

“If this hostility, even aversion, had only been shown towards the Jews at one period and in one country, it would be easy to unravel the limited causes of this anger, but this race has been on the contrary an object of hatred to all the peoples among whom it has established itself. It must be therefore, since the enemies of the Jews belonged to the most diverse races, since they lived in countries very distant from each other; since they were ruled by very different laws, governed by opposite principles, since they had neither the same morals, nor the same customs, since they were animated by unlike dispositions which did not permit them to judge of anything in the same way, it must be therefore that the general cause of anti-Semitism has always resided in Israel itself and not in those who have fought against Israel.”

—Bernard Lazare, noted Jewish author, from his book “L’antisemitisme son histoire et ses causes”, published in 1894, regarding the history of the expulsions of Jews from so many cultures.

–=–
Zionism and Patriotism
–=–

https://i2.wp.com/www.loc.gov/exhibits/haventohome/images/hh0243s.jpg

“A successful lawyer, Louis D. Brandeis (1856-1941) became active in the nascent American Zionist movement on the eve of World War I. In 1914, he became chair of the Provisional Executive Committee for General Zionist Affairs, the leader of American Zionism. His participation served to legitimize the movement in the eyes of American Jewry and other Americans. He believed strongly that Zionism and American patriotism were compatible, a view expressed in the pamphlet displayed here. In 1916, Louis Brandeis became the Supreme Court’s first Jewish justice.

Today, statism, nationalism, and patriotism are socialist/fascist tools used to blindly trick the people into romanticizing about a country called America that somehow still exists with eminent constitutional intent – one that will somehow be taken back through non-violent begging. In my future essay, we will learn that America was never the people’s country in the first place, and that there is nothing to take back!

–=–

“Beware the leader who bangs the drums of war in order to whip the citizenry into a patriotic fervor, for patriotism is indeed a double-edged sword. It both emboldens the blood, just as it narrows the mind. And when the drums of war have reached a fever pitch and the blood boils with hate and the mind has closed, the leader will have no need in seizing the rights of the citizenry. Rather, the citizenry, infused with fear and blinded by patriotism, will offer up all of their rights unto the leader and gladly so. How do I know? For this is what I have done. And I am Caesar.”

–Julius Caesar

–=–

These poor demonized outcasts try to warn the people of the world,
even as the world governments all defend Israel to the death…

http://www.nkusa.org/activities/demonstrations/israeliflag.cfm
Anti-Zionism is anti-Israel… here Jews burn the Israeli flag

https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-gJAYVVB0pKs/UGbUElB_NcI/AAAAAAAAK2Y/LWp_Bjjrlhk/s800/250px-Members_of_Neturei_Karta_Orthodox_Jewish_group_protest_against_Israel.jpg

–=–
For those who have eyes to see, let them see,
and for those who have ears to hear, let them hear.
–=–

We stand on the threshold of a cultural genocide that targets all members of the human race. As the Talmud and Protocols teach, this effort must be done covertly and most importantly incrementally so as to be mostly unseen by the goy (non-Jew).

With this understanding and comprehension, it should be obvious that peace can be accomplished in the world only through the expulsion of this minority from the governments and seats of authority of the world. Authority is nothing more than permission of the people. And with the understanding that law requires force, the nations of the world had best force the international Jew out of their governments before their strength in numbers are lulled into insignificance.

This effort must be universal, for the powers of all nations rest in their hands. The price for resistance is historically evident in the outcome of World War 1 and 2. The power of this Masonic League of Nations now called the United Nations are united to further the Zionist cause, against the informed consent and interests of the people of each individual nation. The peacekeeping forces of the United Jewish Nations are the armies of all usurped nations under Jewish rule and influence. And so individually and with individual sovereignty, the people of those nations must rise together for the common cause of expelling this enemy of all people.

A lofty goal indeed for a world masterfully entertained and brainwashed by the very entity that enslaves them and tells them they are liberated and have freedom…

Of course the legal definition of freedom is “to obey the law”!!!

This blind patriotism and nationalism creates masses of mindless adherants to an obviously lawless set of international Jewish lawmakers.

–=–

Stay tuned, freinds, for this is only scratching the surface. My three-part research project on the true Masonic roots of the United States and its constitution is coming close to being finished. What you have just read has everything to do with that history, with the foundations of Freemasonry, with the establishment and support of Zionism and Israel (Kingdom of Jerusalem), and the fruition of the planned World War III as penned by the Masons themselves at the rebuilding of the sacred Temple of Solomon upon and over the holy Muslim site on the Mount to incite war.

I will post the link to that project here when completed, entitled Cracking The Cult Of The Constitution

.

–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com
–Thursday, June 20th, 2013

Boston Bombing: The Importance Of Public Executions In Peacetime


It has been a long time since I had picked up a copy of the “Report From Iron Mountain“.

But something about this recent bombing event in Boston reminded me of the incredible accuracy of this report in its articulate foreshadowing of many of the decade’s recent political and media “events” and their consequences as a plan of action for a system of peace by deception and control induced by perpetual fear and terror.

If you have not read this document, I strongly urge you to do so as soon as you are able. Here is the link to a pdf:

LINK–> http://projectcamelot.org/Report_from_Iron_Mountain.pdf

And for those who have an aversion to reading, this video presentation was made long ago on vhs tape (warning: severe but tolerable biblical overtones):

 

The report’s subtitle is, “On The Possibility And Desirability Of Peace“, though the personal perspective of the report’s author(s) is more one of psychopathic control by force-induced Orwellian quasi-peace through the threat of violence. It is a carefully thought out plan created in the 1950’s, think tanks, laying out the most perfectly devious ideals on social control through government induced terrorism imaginable. So plausibly insane are these historically accurate suggestions that until you realize they describe exactly what is happening all around us today, you can hardly believe they’ve all but come to fruition.

There was one aspect of the Report From Iron Mountain that particularly stuck with me over the past decade or so from when I first read it. This was the concept of purposefully created and implemented spectacles of public executions by government and its think-tanks and secretive military apparatus.

The report continuously focuses on the state of peace in the population, kept specifically by creating the continuous fear of and simulation of terror attacks and war. In this current stage, the public promotion and media publicizing of these “events” like that of the recent Boston Marathon bombing, the steady string of school shootings, the hanging of Saddam Husein, US Soldiers getting their heads chopped off in supposedly an Arab country, 9/11, Waco, or any other violence and graphic scenes is implemented and delivered into the minds of the population through media. And ultimately, this is considered necessary to maintain the peace by keeping  the constant fear of war and terrorism in the forefront of the peaceful people.

Of course, this process must also be blamed by government on some outside or foreign enemy; the false ideology of unknown terrorism and terrorists all around us that can strike at any time. Even the environment and the weather are the weapons of future control in Report From Iron Mountain.

The report concludes that only in the past has war been the only reliable means to achieve peace at home, theorizing that only during times of war – or the threat of war – are the people compliant enough to tolerate the whims and tyrannies of government without complaint or outright revolt. The perpetual fear of invasion and a random unpredictable attack by an unseen enemy instills a sense of duty to obey and accept nationalist efforts to secure the borders defensively by striking offensively, no matter how morally, ethically, or constitutionally wrong those efforts or how many millions are killed. Random violence creates a tool to promote nationalistic feelings of patriotism where no amount of vile human rights violations and retaliatory sacrifice for the act of self-induced terror will be rejected by the public at large. To rally against and protest this national fervor to kill for revenge to maintain the peace is made to seem like treason by the masses of the population.

And for that nationalistic herd mentality to be accepted and continued even during times of peace, this presentation of “false flag” terrorism and violence must be kept fresh and exiting as a public spectacle often enough to keep instilled in the people that the homeland must be defended without question at all times. For in times of peace and prosperity, without the constant flashes of TV monitors and graphic print media propaganda, the people will inevitably begin to ask why such organized homeland security and the violation of their natural and political rights is either necessary or warranted. They will eventually resent higher taxes and the bureaucracy of government’s legal organized efforts to extort as much money as possible from the public without some threat from an outside enemy. They will even except the unreasonable paradigm that food, water, and natural resource shortages are a result of this illusion of terror. In peacetime, respect is lost for public leaders, which leads to social breakdown of the continuity and control of government. But with violence comes a false sense of respect out of perceived necessity, just as any person would temporarily respect a robber who required their wallet at gunpoint. Indeed no past government or civilization has overcome the deterioration and self-awareness of the masses that comes with the establishment of peace. Thus, to “stabilize society”, the Report From Iron Mountain concludes that the perpetual threat of perceived war, attack, and violence at home is paramount.

Here is what the report notes on (page 39):

The war system not only has been essential to the existence of nations as independent political entities, but has been equally indispensable to their stable political structure. Without it, no government has ever been able to obtain acquiescence in its “legitimacy”, or right to rule its society. The possibility of war provides the sense of external necessity without which no government can long remain in power. The historical record reveals one instance after another where the failure of a regime to maintain the credibility of a war threat led to its dissolution, by the forces of private interest, or reactions to social injustice, or of other disintegrative elements. The organization of society for the possibility of war is its principal political stabilizer. It has enabled societies to maintain necessary class distinctions, and it has insured the subordination of the citizens to the state by virtue of the residual war powers inherent in the concept of nationhood.

It is extremely difficult for so much of the population to even ponder the possibility that these attacks, bombings, and public killings blasted all over the media could actually be perpetrated by their own government. And yet, what possible group or person would hope to gain anything by bombing a bunch of runners in a marathon in Boston – except the group that wishes to pass ever more controlling regulations over all people; calling it “Homeland Security”? Who else but government can doctor the evidence? And who else but government can force the media to push the theory that Arab terrorists from some nation-less militant cell of “terrorists” were the responsible party with no proof whatsoever but that which government creates?

The report explains on (page 39) just how peace and control can be maintained through continuous planned and publicized public executions of innocents by perceived terrorists for “social organization”:

In general, the war system provides the basic motivation for primary social organization. In so doing, it reflects on the societal level the incentives of individual human behavior. The most important of these, for social purposes, is the individual psychological rationale for allegiance to a society and its values. Allegiance requires a cause; a cause requires an enemy. This much is obvious; the critical point is that the enemy that defines the cause must seem genuinely formidable. Roughly speaking, the presumed power of the “enemy” sufficient to warrant an individual sense of allegiance to a society must be proportionate to the size and complexity of the society. Today, of course, that power must be one of unprecedented magnitude and frightfulness.

It follows, from the patterns of human behavior, that the credibility of a social “enemy” demands similarly a readiness of response in proportion to its menace. In a broad social context, “an eye for an eye” still characterizes the only acceptable attitude toward a presumed threat of aggression, despite contrary religious and moral precepts governing personal conduct. The remoteness of personal decision from social consequence in a modern society makes it easy for its members to maintain this attitude without being aware of it. A recent example is the war in Vietnam; a less recent one was the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. In each case, the extent and gratuitousness of the slaughter were abstracted into political formulae by most Americans, once the proposition that the victims were “enemies” was established. The war system makes such an abstracted response possible in nonmilitary contexts as well. A conventional example of this mechanism is the inability of most people to connect, let us say, the starvation of millions in India with their own past conscious political decision-making. Yet the sequential logic linking a decision to restrict grain production in America with an eventual famine in Asia is obvious, unambiguous, and unconcealed.

What gives the war system its preeminent role in social organization, as elsewhere, is its unmatched authority over life and death. It must be emphasized again that the war system is not a mere social extension of the presumed need for individual human violence, but itself in turn serves to rationalize most nonmilitary killing. It also provides the precedent for the collective willingness of members of a society to pay a blood price for institutions far less central to social organization than war. To take a handy example…”rather than accept speed limits of twenty miles an hour we prefer to let automobiles kill forty thousand people a year.” A Rand analyst puts it in more general terms and less rhetorically: “I am sure that there is, in effect, a desirable level of automobile accidents—desirable, that is, from a broad point of view; in the sense that it is a necessary concomitant of things of greater value to society.” The point may seem too obvious for iteration, but it is essential to an understanding of the important motivational function of war as a model for collective sacrifice. A brief look at some defunct premodern societies is instructive. One of the most noteworthy features common to the larger, more complex, and more successful of ancient civilizations was their widespread use of the blood sacrifice. If one were to limit consideration to those cultures whose regional hegemony was so complete that the prospect of “war” had become virtually inconceivable —as was the case with several of the great pre-Columbian societies of the Western Hemisphere—it would be found that some form of ritual killing occupied a position of paramount social importance in each. Invariably, the ritual was invested with mythic or religious significance; as will all religious and totemic practice, however, the ritual masked a broader and more important social
function.

In these societies, the blood sacrifice served the purpose of maintaining a vestigial “earnest” of the society’s capability and willingness to make war– i.e., kill and be killed—in the event that some mystical–i.e., unforeseen — circumstance were to give rise to the possibility. That the “earnest” was not an adequate substitute for genuine military organization when the unthinkable enemy, such as the Spanish conquistadors, actually appeared on the scene in no way negates the function of the ritual. It was primarily, if not exclusively, a symbolic reminder that war had once been the central organizing force of the society, and that this condition might recur.

It does not follow that a transition to total peace in modern societies would require the use of this model, even in less “barbaric” guise. But the historical analogy serves as a reminder that a viable substitute for war as a social system cannot be a mere symbolic charade. It must involve risk of real personal destruction, and on a scale consistent with the size and complexity of modern social systems. Credibility is the key. Whether the substitute is ritual in nature or functionally substantive, unless it provides a believable life- and-death threat it will not serve the socially organizing function of war.

The existence of an accepted external menace, then, is essential to social cohesiveness as well as to the acceptance of political authority. The menace must be believable, it must be of a magnitude consistent with the complexity of the society threatened, and it must appear, at least, to affect the entire society.

Part of this difficulty to truly grasp that government is the true terrorist is the refusal to believe that at the end of the day, government is nothing but a corporation – an enterprise operation that treats people no differently than cattle in its consideration of the governed. The report refers to several think tanks and authors who make this distinction quite clear; that people are nothing but profit and loss commodities for governments disposal. Here, at the end of the Iron Mountain report, we read this:

1. A primer-level example of the obvious and long overdue need for such translation is furnished by Kahn (in Thinking About the Unthinkable, p.102). Under the heading “Some Awkward Choices” he compares four hypothetical policies: a certain loss of $3,000; a .1 chance of loss of $300,000; a.01 chance of loss of $30,000,000; and a .001 chance of loss of $3,000,000,000. A government decision-maker would “very likely” choose in that order. But what if “lives are at stake rather than dollars?” Kahn suggests that the order of choice would be reversed, although current experience does not support this opinion. Rational war research can and must make it possible to express, without ambiguity, lives in terms of dollars and vice versa; the choices need not be, and cannot be, “awkward.

2. Again, an overdue extension of an obvious application of techniques up to now limited such circumscribed purposes as improving kill-ammunition ratios determining local choice between precision and saturation bombing, and other minor tactical, and occasionally strategic, ends. The slowness of Rand, I.D.A., and other responsible analytic organizations to extend cost-effectiveness and related concepts beyond early-phase applications has already been widely remarked on and criticized elsewhere.

(Page 53) expounds upon the importance of this Orwellian necessity of war in peace with regards to the thinking people who un-patriotically oppose this “war system”:

Another possible surrogate for the control of potential enemies of society is the reintroduction, in some form consistent with modern technology and political processes, of slavery. Up to now, this has been suggested only in fiction, notably in the works of Wells, Huxley, Orwell, and others engaged in the imaginative anticipation of the sociology of the future. But the fantasies projected in Brave New World and 1984 have seemed less and less implausible over the years since their publication. The traditional association of slavery with ancient pre-industrial cultures should not blind us to its adaptability to advanced forms of social organization, nor should its equally traditional incompatibility with Western moral and economic values. It is entirely possible that the development of a sophisticated form of slavery may be an absolute prerequisite for social control in a world at peace. As a practical matter, conversion of the code of military discipline to a euphemized form of enslavement would entail surprisingly little revision; the logical first step would be the adoption of some form of “universal” military service.

When it comes to postulating a credible substitute for war capable of directing human behavior patterns in behalf of social organization, few options suggest themselves. Like its political function, the motivational function of war requires the existence of a genuinely menacing social enemy. The principal difference is that for purposes of motivating basic allegiance, as distinct from accepting political authority, the “alternate enemy” must imply a more immediate, tangible, and directly felt threat of destruction. It must justify the need for taking and paying a “blood price” in wide areas of human concern. In this respect, the possible enemies noted earlier would be insufficient. One exception might be the environmental-pollution model, if the danger to society it posed was genuinely imminent. The fictive models would have to carry the weight of extraordinary conviction, underscored with a not inconsiderable actual sacrifice of life; the construction of an up-to-date mythological or religious structure for this purpose would present difficulties in our era, but must certainly be considered.

(Page 54) continues:

Games theorists have suggested, in other contexts, the development of “blood games” for the effective control of individual aggressive impulses. It is an ironic commentary on the current state of war and peace studies that it was left not to scientists but to the makers of a commercial film to develop a model for this notion, on the implausible level of popular melodrama, as a ritualized manhunt. More realistically, such a ritual might be socialized, in the manner of the Spanish Inquisition and the less formal witch trials of other periods, for purposes of “social purification,” “state security,” or other rationale both acceptable and credible to postwar societies. The feasibility of such an updated version of still another ancient institution, though doubtful, is considerably less fanciful than the wishful notion of many peace planners that a lasting condition of peace can be brought about without the most painstaking examination of every possible surrogate for the essential functions of war. What is involved here, in a sense, is the quest for William James’ “moral equivalent of war.”

It is also possible that the two functions considered under this heading may be jointly served, in the sense of establishing the antisocial, for whom a control institution is needed, as the “alternate enemy” needed to hold society together. The relentless and irreversible advance of unemployability at all levels of society, and the similar extension of generalized alienation from accepted values may make some such program necessary even as an adjunct to the war system. As before, we will not speculate on the specific forms this kind of program might take, except to note that there is again ample precedent, in the treatment meted out to disfavored, allegedly menacing, ethnic groups in certain societies during certain historical periods.

It might surprise the average reader to see such verbiage used as causally as it is here. The fact that there are actually “peace planners” controlling peacetime activities is like a cow realizing for the first time in its life that the farmer has indeed planned out its own life and society, and for that matter its slaughter.

Continued…

The existence of an accepted external menace, then, is essential to social cohesiveness as well as to the acceptance of political authority. The menace must be believable, it must be of a magnitude consistent with the complexity of the society threatened, and it must appear, at least, to affect the entire society.

The report also gives alternative possibilities to control the people, like the purposeful control of reproduction (population control) through both popular, legally binding, and covert means:

ECOLOGICAL

Considering the shortcomings of war as a mechanism of selective population control, it might appear that devising substitutes for this function should be comparatively simple. Schematically this is so, but the problem of timing the transition to a new ecological balancing device makes the feasibility of substitution less certain. It must be remembered that the limitation of war in this function is entirely eugenic. War has not been genetically progressive. But as a system of gross population control to preserve the species it cannot fairly be faulted. And, as has been pointed out, the nature of war is itself in transition. Current trends in warfare–the increased strategic bombing of civilians and the greater military importance now attached to the destruction of sources of supply (as opposed to purely “military” bases and personnel)—strongly suggest that a truly qualitative improvement is in the making.

There is no question but that a universal requirement that procreation be limited to the products of artificial insemination would provide a fully adequate substitute control for population levels. Such a reproductive system would, of course, have the added advantage of being susceptible of direct eugenic management. Its predictable further development—conception and embryonic growth taking place wholly under laboratory conditions–would extend these controls to their logical conclusion. The ecological function of war under these circumstances would not only be superseded but surpassed in effectiveness. The indicated intermediate step–total control of conception with a variant of the ubiquitous “pill,” via water supplies or certain essential foodstuffs, offset by a controlled “antidote”—is already under development. There would appear to be no foreseeable need to revert to any of the outmoded practices referred to in the previous section (infanticide, etc.) as there might have been if the possibility of transition to peace had arisen two generations ago. The real question here, therefore, does not concern the viability of this war substitute, but the political problems involved in bringing it about. It cannot be established while the war system is still in effect. The reason for this is simple: excess population is tar material. As long as any society must contemplate even a remote possibility of war, it must maintain a maximum supportable population, even when so doing critically aggravates an economic liability. This is paradoxical, in view of war’s role in reducing excess population, but it is readily understood. War controls the general population level, but the ecological interest of any single society lies in maintaining its hegemony vis-a-vis other societies. The obvious analogy can be seen in any free-enterprise economy. Practices damaging to the society as a whole–both competitive and monopolistic–are abetted by the conflicting economic motives of individual capital interests. The obvious precedent can be found in the seemingly irrational political difficulties which have blacked universal adoption of simple birth control methods. Nations desperately in need of increasing unfavorable production-consumption ratios are nevertheless unwilling to gamble their possible military requirements of twenty years hence for this purpose. Unilateral population control, as practiced in ancient Japan and in other isolated societies, is out of the question in today’s world.

Since the eugenic solution cannot be achieved until the transition to the peace system takes place, why not wait? One must qualify the inclination to agree. As we noted earlier, a real possibility of an unprecedented global crisis of insufficiency exists today, which the war system may not be able to forestall. If this should come to pass before an agreed-upon transition to peace were completed, the result might be irrevocably disastrous. There is clearly no solution to this dilemma; it is a risk which must be taken. But it tends to support the view that if a decision is made to eliminate the war system, it were better done sooner than later.

Earlier in the report (page 42), it also states:

Another secondary ecological trend bearing on projected population growth is the regressive effect of certain medical advances. Pestilence, for example, is no longer an important factor in population control. The problem of increased life expectancy has been aggravated. These advances also pose a potentially more sinister problem, in that undesirable genetic traits that were formerly self-liquidating are now medically maintained. Many diseases that were once fatal at pre-procreational ages are now cured; the effect of this development is to perpetuate undesirable susceptibilities and mutations. It seems clear that a new quasi-eugenic function of war is now in process of formation that will have to be taken into account in any transition plan. For the time being, the Department of Defense appears to have recognized such factors, as has been demonstrated by the planning under way by the Rand Corporation to cope with the breakdown in the ecological balance anticipated after a thermonuclear war. The Department has also begun to stockpile birds, for example, against the expected proliferation of radiation-resistant insects, etc.

And what of the subversive element of self-thinkers like myself, who rail against this eugenic control structure and war paradigm while trying to inform others of their unwitting fall into a projected peace based upon the lie of an imminent threat of terror attack and war?

Why government creates a service-oriented, non-violent military structure of course, as seen on (page 52):

SOCIOLOGICAL

Of the many functions of war we have found convenient to group together in this classification, two are critical. In a world of peace, the continuing stability of society will require: 1) an effective substitute for military institutions that can neutralize destabilizing social elements and 2) a credible motivational surrogate for war that can insure social cohesiveness. The first is an essential element of social control; the second is the basic mechanism for adapting individual human drives to the needs of society.

Most proposals that address themselves, explicitly or otherwise, to the postwar problem of controlling the socially alienated turn to some variant of the Peace Corps or the so-called Job Corps for a solution. The socially disaffected, the economically unprepared, the psychologically unconformable, the hard-core “delinquents,” the incorrigible “subversives,” and the rest of the unemployable are seen as somehow transformed by the disciplines of a service modeled on military precedent into more or less dedicated social service workers. This presumption also informs the otherwise hardheaded ratiocination of the “Unarmed Forces” plan

Another possible surrogate for the control of potential enemies of society is the reintroduction, in some form consistent with modern technology and political processes, of slavery… (listed above)

–=–

Perhaps most difficult to comprehend for myself is the fact that this report actually lends credence to the dystopian ideas of Orwellian doublespeak. The Report From Iron Mountain clearly has the conclusion that war is peace, or at least that the illusion of war is necessary to maintain peace and government. Murder is life. Depopulation is duty. Procreation is death. Government is necessary…?

This paradoxical thought process, if one stops to ponder, is the very foundation of our current and growing sub-economy. From unmanned drones, NSA surveillance, cameras at every intersection, computer cyber-security, credit fraud protection, satellite monitoring, Homeland Security, transportation security, biometric identification, identification theft prevention, private contracting for military, security guards of all types, firewalls, anti-virus software, and every other form of terror-prevention programs, the country is literally being transferred from a war system to a peace system preventing an external threat that doesn’t really exist but internally. And the entire economy is being set up to prevent perceived but staged terror attacks by the very government control system that supplies and promotes violent attacks so as to promote a totally defensive peace.

Peace through terror is the New World Order.

Are we to live in a world where peace can only be kept through government-planned and executed terror attacks?

According to the Report From Iron Mountain, the answer is yes. And this means that random yet purposeful bombings like the one that hit the Boston Marathon on Monday are surely to continue perpetually into our foreseeable future.

That is, unless the “socially disaffected, the economically unprepared, the psychologically unconformable, the hard-core “delinquents,” the incorrigible “subversives,” and the rest of the unemployable” people out there rise up, organize, and put an end to this madness on behalf of all those who cannot see that government is the true enemy of the people.

Until then, I will continue to use my keyboard as my weapon against this “peace system” that is being foisted upon us, and I hope that you will take the time to read the Report From Iron Mountain before we, the “unconformable subversives” – the “potential enemies of society” become the new peace system slave foreshadowed in this report.

See you on the other side, my fellow degenerates….

.

–Clint Richardson (Realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Wednesday, April 17, 2013

A World Without Gray – Episode 3 – For Land And Country


Episode 3, for your listening enjoyment. This is my interview with Vicky Davis, writer and researcher of ChannelingReality.com

I highly recommend that you read the following information (below) before or after listening to this interview, for I believe it is one of my most important research projects yet in uncovering the true nature of the United States. Also, please watch the two videos at the end, for a glimpse of the future of mankind and America…

Download here: https://realitybloger.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/awwg_e3_02072013.mp3

–=–

For Land And Country

–=–

What does it mean to you when someone says “fight for your country”?

For some, the concept of just what a “country” is becomes blurred between two completely different things. While the conversational term for country usually defines the living people, the physical land, and the fictional government together in one neat package, the fact is that these things are quite different from one another, and are only connected through ink and consent of those living people as a “body politic”.

The “land” – the real and tangible thing we call home – is indeed not legally the “country”. Living men are also not legally the country.

The country is in fact a reamed folder of legal papers, notarized and signed by the appropriate members of a corporate “federation” called the United States. It’s borders are demarcated within this paperwork, but these too are not part of the actual physical land. It sets its own rules, changes those rules with the signing of a pen, and does so without the will of the people.

The land and the living people who inhabit it are called a country – a body politic – but only in a legal sense. The people, in order to inhabit this artificial country legally as “residents”, must also become artificial. They must become persons through contract so as to be part of (citizens) of this legal “country”.

“A “federation” is by definition an unincorporated entity, but a “federated” entity is corporated. A “union” of states is not a corporate entity, but that the “United” States is a corporation.”

Confused? You are supposed to be.

Instead of taking my word for it, I wonder what the government, the courts, and the Supreme Court thinks?

“Persons dealing with the government are charged with knowing government statutes and regulations, and they assume the risk that government agents may exceed their authority and provide misinformation,” –Lavin v. Marsh, 644 F.2d 1378 (9th Cir. 1981), 644 F.2d, at 1383.

“Whatever the form in which the government functions, anyone entering into an arrangement with the government takes a risk of having accurately ascertained that he who purports to act for the government stays within the bounds of his authority, even though the agent himself may be unaware of the limitations upon his authority.” –Federal Crop Insurance v. Merrill, Supreme Court, 332 U.S. 380

From the West LegalEdcenter’s Securities Litigation Report:

Link: http://corporate.findlaw.com/finance/cftc-sees-dodd-frank-reforms-essential-to-reduce-future-risk.html

“International Coordination”

Twenty-first century finance knows no true geographic borders. Money and risk can move around the globe with a touch of a button. Sober evidence of this was AIG’s swaps affiliate, AIG Financial Products, which had its major operations in London. When it failed, the U.S. economy and taxpayers shouldered a tremendous burden.

The current debt crisis in Europe is but a stark reminder of our interconnectedness. Moreover, it is precisely during times of heightened market uncertainty that transparent pricing of risk is essential. While European leaders are working to avert a deepening crisis, it is critical that we implement the Dodd-Frank Act to protect the American public.

We are actively consulting and coordinating with international regulators to promote robust and consistent standards in swaps oversight. We are sharing many of our memos, term sheets and draft work product with international regulators. Building on these efforts, I will be traveling to London to discuss derivatives reform as well as issues relating to high-frequency trading.

We also will work with international colleagues on memoranda of understanding for access to information and cooperative oversight. We also have a long history of recognizing foreign regulatory regimes. The Dodd-Frank Act authorizes the CFTC to recognize foreign regulatory frameworks that are comprehensive and comparable to U.S. oversight of the swaps markets in certain areas. We also anticipate seeking public input on the application of Section 722(d) of the Dodd-Frank Act, which says that the law doesn’t apply to activities outside the United States unless those activities have a direct and significant connection with activities in, or effect on, U.S. commerce.

So, let’s get this straight… The Dodd-Frank Act was a tool by Congress to prohibit one of government’s regulatory corporations (the Commodities Futures Trading Commission – CFTC) to act outside of United States jurisdiction as long as the activities to be regulated are outside of the United States? Yes sir. But the reality of what this means is even more shocking. For when the term “outside of the United States” is utilized here, it is referring to United States borders (remember, they are paper borders created by treaty and international agreements). This is where “Inland Ports” and “Foreign Trade Zones” come into play. This is how your “country” (both the land and the government) is incrementally being pulled out from under your feet – while American Idol agonizingly plays in the other room – through contracts, treaties, and international agreements.

If we were to look at a true representative interactive map of the borders of the United States, it would actually look like a U.S. shaped slice of Swiss cheese. Incrementally, as each Inland Port and Foreign Trade Zone is implemented, a new hole in the middle of the United States appears, where U.S. laws are non-existent.

Let’s take a land-locked state like Colorado for example. As there are no oceans (international waters) touching any of Colorado’s borders (the land), there is only one way to create an Inland Port in this state. The state must become a virtual body of water.

When an Inland Port is created, it becomes an international jurisdiction under international Maritime Law. And since Maritime/Admiralty law is the “law of the sea”, the land must become a port among a body of water in legal terms. Thus, as a port receiving trade through trade-routes, the land now becomes international jurisdiction. it’s brilliant really, when you stop and think about it. Suddenly a port pops up in the middle of of the land, with no water around it whatsoever. And yet it falls under the law of the sea!

So how is this accomplished?

Perhaps you’ve heard of the controversial NAFTA Super Highways…

You see, the rest of the United States (the land) becomes a “land-bridge” over virtual (paper) water between these ports and zones, and the roads and highways now outside of the United States called NAFTA represent international virtual waterways under international Admiralty Law going from Inland Port to Inland Port. Thus, the whole structure of ports and highways are under the law of the sea – outside of the United States. Why start a limited corporation in the great state of Colorado when you can move 10 miles away into an unlimited Foreign Trade Zone? Why hire American workers with all of their demands and minimum wages laws when you can hire foreigners living in these Foreign Zones? After all, anyone can live and work in the Zones without being a United States citizen. And with no U.S. labor laws, health insurance, or pension funding requirements for retirement, why hire American when you can hire Chinese, Indonesian, or Indian at a fraction of the cost? It’s just on the other side of the Highway you know…

In the middle of America…

So now let’s get back to government’s opinion:

“The House and Senate Reports accompanying the legislation virtually compel this conclusion, explaining as they do that “a foreign government’s . . . employment or engagement of laborers, clerical staff or marketing agents . . . would be among those included within” the definition of commercial activity. H.R.Rep. No. 94-1487, p. 16 (1976) (House Report); S. Rep. No. 94-1310, p. 16 (1976) (Senate Report)…”

“I had thought the [507 U.S. 349, 369] issue put to rest some time ago when, in a slightly different context, CHIEF JUSTICE Marshall observed:

“It is, we think, a sound principle, that when a government becomes a partner in any trading company, it divests itself, so far as concerns the transactions of that company, of its sovereign character, and takes that of a private citizen. Instead of communicating to the company its privileges and its prerogatives, it descends to a level with those with whom it associates itself, and takes the character which belongs to its associates, and to the business which is to be transacted. Thus, many States of this Union who have an interest in Banks, are not suable even in their own Courts; yet they never exempt the corporation from being sued. The State of Georgia, by giving to the Bank the capacity to sue and be sued, voluntarily strips itself of its sovereign character, so far as respects the transactions of the Bank, and waives all the privileges of that character. As a member of a corporation, a government never exercises its sovereignty. It acts merely as a corporator, and exercises no other power in the management of the affairs of the corporation, than are expressly given by the incorporating act.” –U.S. Supreme Court, Bank of the United States v. Planters’ Bank of Georgia (1824) 22 US (9 Wheat) 904, 6 L.Ed 244

See also Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. Republic of Cuba, 425 U.S. 682, 695 -696 (1976) (plurality opinion).”

(Source: http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=507&invol=349)

According to Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, under the definition for the word “corporation”, it states:

“Chief Justice Marshall describes a corporation to be “an artificial being, invisible, intangible, and existing only in contemplation of law. Being the mere creature of law,” continues the judge, “it possesses only those properties which the charter of its creation confers upon it, either expressly or as incidental to its very existence. These are such as are supposed best calculated to effect the object for which it was created. Among the most important are immortality, and if the expression may be allowed, individuality properties by which a perpetual succession of many persons are considered, as the same, and may act as the single individual, They enable a corporation to manage its own affairs, and to hold property without the perplexing intricacies, the hazardous and endless necessity of perpetual conveyance for the purpose of transmitting it from hand to hand. It is chiefly for the purpose of clothing bodies of men, in succession, with these qualities and capacities, that corporations were invented, and are in use.”

(Author’s Note: It is important to note here that technically the corporation of the United States or portions thereof can be “conveyed” to foreign hands, including the United Nations. Remember, this is all on paper, through treaties and agreements. And it wont likely make the nightly news as it happens piece by piece, port by port, zone by zone… This can all be done while never changing the corporate charter name of “United States” or of states, counties, cities (municipal corporations), and districts.)

And this legal definition goes on to state:

Corporation: “Nations or states, are denominated by publicists, bodies politic, and are said to have their affairs and interests, and to deliberate and resolve, in common. They thus become as moral persons, having an understanding and will peculiar to themselves, and are susceptible of obligations and laws. Vattel, 49. In this extensive sense the United States may be termed a corporation; and so may each state singly.”

And Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856, defines the word corporator as:

CORPORATOR. One who is a member of a corporation. 2. In general, a corporator is entitled to enjoy all the benefits and rights which belong to any other member of the corporation as such. But in some corporations, where the rights are of a pecuniary nature, each corporator is entitles to those rights in proportion to his interest; he will therefore be entitled to vote only in proportion to the amount of his stock, and be entitled to dividends in the same proportion. 3. A corporator is not in general liable personally for any act of the corporation, unless he has been made so by the charter creating the corporation.

(Author’s Note: This means the American people can be made liable for United Nations debt or funding, and that the United States is a member- i. e. not a “sovereign” entity – with only a “vote” in world affairs, including its own.)

Note here that the United States is a “member” of the United Nations, and of the International Monetary Fund (World Bank).

Can you put the pieces together?

And of course when Bouvier’s defines the United States, it says:

UNION. By this word is understood the United States of America; as, all good citizens will support the Union.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. The name of this country. The United States… 5. The United States of America are a corporation endowed with the capacity to sue and be sued, to convey and receive property.

Again from the Supreme Court – near the year of the founding of this “country”…

“If Congress, previous to the Articles of Confederation, possessed any authority, it was an authority, as I have shown, derived from the people of each province in the first instance. When the obnoxious acts of Parliament passed, if the people in each province had chosen to resist separately, they undoubtedly had equal right to do so as to join in general measures of resistance with the people of the other provinces, however unwise and destructive such a policy might and undoubtedly would have been. If they had pursued this separate system, and afterwards the people of each province had resolved that such province should be a free and independent state, the state from that moment would have become possessed of all the powers of sovereignty internal and external — viz., the exclusive right of providing for their own government, and regulating their intercourse with foreign nations — as completely as any one of the ancient kingdoms or republics of the world, which never yet had formed or thought of forming any sort of federal union whatever. A distinction was taken at the bar between a state and the people of the state. It is a distinction I am not capable of comprehending. By a state forming a republic (speaking of it as a moral person) I do not mean the legislature of the state, the executive of the state, or the judiciary, but all the citizens which compose that state and are, if I may so express myself, integral parts of it, all together forming a body politic. The great distinction between monarchies and republics (at least our republics) in general is that in the former, the monarch is considered as the sovereign, and each individual of his nation as subject to him, though in some countries with many important special limitations. This, I say, is generally the case, for it has not been so universally.

But in a republic, all the citizens, as such, are equal, and no citizen can rightfully exercise any authority over another but in virtue of a power constitutionally given by the whole community, and such authority, when exercised, is in effect an act of the whole community which forms such body politic. In such governments, therefore, the sovereignty resides in the great body of the people, but it resides in them not as so many distinct individuals, but in their politic capacity only. Thus A. B. C. and D., citizens of Pennsylvania and as such together with all the citizens of Pennsylvania, share in the sovereignty of the state. Suppose a state to consist exactly of the number of 100,000 citizens, and it were practicable for all of them to assemble at one time and in one place, and that 99,999 did actually assemble. The state would not be in fact assembled. Why? Because the state in fact is composed of all the citizens, not of a part only, however large that part may be, and one is wanting, in the same manner as 99 is not a hundred, because one pound is wanting to complete the full sum.

But as such exactness in human affairs cannot take place, as the world would be at an end or involved in universal massacre and confusion if entire unanimity from every society was required; as the assembling in large numbers, if practicable as to the actual meeting of all the citizens, or even a considerable part of them, could be productive of no rational result because there could be no general debate, no consultation of the whole, nor of consequence a determination grounded on reason and reflection, and a deliberate view of all the circumstances necessary to be taken into consideration, mankind has long practiced (except where special exceptions have been solemnly adopted) upon the principle that the majority shall bind the whole, and in large countries, at least, that representatives shall be chosen to act on the part of the whole. But when they do so, they decide for the whole, and not for themselves only.

Thus when the legislature of any state passes a bill by a majority, competent to bind the whole, it is an act of the whole assembly, not of the majority merely. So when this Court gives a judgment by the opinion of a majority, it is the judgment, in a legal sense, of the whole Court. So I conceive when any law is passed in any state in pursuance of constitutional authority, it is a law of the whole state acting in its legislative capacity, as are also executive and judiciary acts constitutionally authorized, acts of the whole state in its executive or judiciary capacity, and not the personal acts alone of the individuals, composing those branches of government. The same principles apply as to legislative, executive, or judicial acts of the United States, which are acts of the people of the United States in those respective capacities, as the former are of the people of a single state. These principles have long been familiar in regard to the exercise of a constitutional power as to treaties. These are deemed the treaties of the two nations, not of the persons only whose authority was actually employed in their formation. There is not one principle that I can imagine which gives such an effect as to treaties that has not such an operation on any other legitimate act of government, all powers being equally derived from the same fountain, all held equally in trust, and all, when rightfully exercised, equally binding upon those from whom the authority was derived.

I conclude, therefore, that every particle of authority which originally resided either in Congress or in any branch of the state governments was derived from the people who were permanent inhabitants of each province in the first instance and afterwards became citizens of each state; that this authority was conveyed by each body politic separately, and not by all the people in the several provinces or states jointly, and of course that no authority could be conveyed to the whole but that which previously was possessed by the several parts; that the distinction between a state and the people of a state has in this respect no foundation, each expression in substance meaning the same thing; consequently, that one ground of argument at the bar, tending to show the superior sovereignty of Congress in the instance in question, was not tenable, and therefore that upon that ground the exercise of the authority in question can not be supported.”

(Source: http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/3/54/case.html)

This important opinion tells you one very important thing… You do not now or did they then live in a true idealistic republic! If you are a citizen, you are nothing more than a part of the whole citizenry (in this case equality is a bad thing, for it takes away your rights). You are the State – a tiny piece of the jigsaw puzzle made up of equal size citizens. The people and the State are the same thing. “Distinct individuals have no power or sovereignty – only the state does as a body politic of all the people combined. This literally squashes the theory that in the United States all men are kings of themselves. This is just a falacy to be shelved with all the other “free country” myths out there. And the State creates these treaties and agreements with Foreign entities with the legal presumption that you don’t give a damn!

You aren’t fighting it, if you even know about it, and so the plans for world governance and the conveyance of the United States lands into United Nations (NWO) hands goes on unhindered.

For some clarification, here are the Bovier’s Law Dictionary definitions of a “Republic”:

REPUBLIC. A commonwealth; that form of government in which the administration of affairs is open to all the citizens. In another sense, it signifies the state, independently of its form of government. 1 Toull. n. 28, and n. 202, note. In this sense, it is used by Ben Johnson. Those that, by their deeds make it known, whose dignity they do sustain; And life, state, glory, all they gain, Count the Republic’s, not their own, Vide Body Politic; Nation; State.

REPUBLICAN GOVERNMENT. A government in the republican form; a government of the people; it is usually put in opposition to a monarchical or aristocratic government. 2. The fourth section of the fourth article of the constitution, directs that “the United States shall guaranty to every state in the Union a republican form of government.” The form of government is to be guarantied, which supposes a form already established, and this is the republican form of government the United States have undertaken to protect. See Story, Const. §1807.

Yet another common fallacy squashed by the constitution itself!

Some how the people of the United States have mixed up the notion that the “United States” government – the central government of Washington D.C. as a federation – is supposed to be a republic. But this is not what the constitution states at all. The only requirement of the United States Federal Government laid out in its constitution is that the United States corporation in Washington D.C. must protect the already establish form of government of each individual state. Remember, the citizen is subject to two forms of government, one the state and one Federal.

On this, the Supreme Court state its opinion:

“The people of the United States resident within any State are subject to two Governments: one State, and the other National; but there need be no conflict between the two. The powers which one possesses, the other does not. They are established for different purposes, and have separate jurisdictions. Together they make one whole, and furnish the people of the United States with a complete government, ample for the protection of all their rights at home and abroad. True, it may sometimes happen that a person is amenable to both jurisdictions for one and the same act… It is the natural consequence of a citizenship which owes allegiance to two sovereignties, and claims protection from both. The citizen cannot complain, because he has voluntarily submitted himself to such a form of government.–The Supreme Court, 92 US 551: “U.S. v Cruikshank”

While you may live in a republic within your individual state, you do not live in a republic called the United States. The distinction here is absolutely key, and the tempering of fallacious considerations of the intent of the national government

And if “Common Law” is your bag, you should know that in the same case the Supreme Court stated its opinion about the Common Law:

“It is a rule at common law (the reason applies in equity and other civil law cases) that if a party can plead a fact material to his defense, and omits to do it at the proper time, he can never avail himself of it afterwards.”

Now why would anyone in their right mind agree to such a sinister and offending rule as this? And why would anyone submit to this?

Can you imagine…

You: Oh yeah judge, I forgot to mention that I have a video tape and 20 witnesses that saw me 1,000 miles away from the scene of the crime at the exact time of the crime.

Judge (as his gavel smashes down): Inadmissible! Guilty as charged!!!

It goes on to say:

“The law rather chooses that a party should incur a risk of this nature than leave a door open to endless litigation upon pretenses the truth of which it is very difficult to discover.”

God forbid we should have long litigation in order to discover the truth!

This is called the “justice system”, by the way. And the only thing common about common law is that it is commonly tyrannical just like any other legal system. Even if you had a good experience in court by a judge who seemed lawful or constitutional, this does not dismiss the fact that at any time this type of “opinion” can arise. It’s a rule that a judge may choose to follow at his whim. And while a man acting as judge may certainly consider late evidence, he certainly is not required to. Law means nothing to a corrupt politician or judge. And it is certainly a fallacy to overlook the rules just because once you had a good experience. The fallacy: This judge acted fairly and constitutionally, therefore all judges act fairly and constitutionally.

In this particular case, believe it or not, the “person” harmed was actually physically dead, but since the defendants did not claim this fact within the discovery process, this fact actually had no bearing on the case. The fact that the person was dead was not considered when doing wrong to that person. Image how that felt to the defendants when those words were uttered by the judge, who were no doubt thinking… Why in the hell would this fact even need to be mentioned???

It states:

“II. The death of Doane has been alleged for another purpose.

It is said that the decree is to restore to Elisha Doane, which was impossible because Elisha Doane was not then in being. Admitting that upon this record we are to take judicial notice that Doane was dead at the time of pronouncing the decree (in which I am by no means clear), yet if this was the real reason why the plaintiffs in error had withheld the property or its proceeds, they might themselves have said so. They have not, and as each party generally makes the best of his own case, we are to presume that did not in fact constitute their reason. In this case it could be of no avail but at the utmost to prevent the allowance of interest until a demand actually made. It never could destroy the whole beneficial effect of a decree given in rem, and when the parties who make the objection were in court and parties to the very decree complained of. I think nothing can be more evident than that if the decree be not totally void, the administrators are entitled to the benefit of it, at least until it is set aside for error, if there be any error in it, and such a remedy is now practicable. If a scire facias was necessary before execution could have been obtained out of the court which passed the decree, it could be for no other reason than that the other party might have an opportunity to contest the validity of the letters and the existence of the administration, if any such objection could be supported. Such an objection might have been made here. It has not been made. There is therefore, I conceive, no principle of law or justice which forbids giving effect to the decree upon this ground.”

You: But judge, the victim was already dead before I had anything to do with her!

Judge: Inadmissible! Guilty as charged!!!

Ok, extreme I admit. The point is that the possibility – as a rule – is that at any time a judge can dismiss crucial evidence that would prove your innocence without considering it.

But listen to what was stated even later in this case:

“A court of justice, indeed, ought at its peril to take notice of its own jurisdiction, and it is not often that cases of such doubt arise that a judge can be at a loss on the subject. But it may happen and does sometimes happen that innocent and serious doubts are really entertained. Is a court therefore, because its judgments may be finally dissented from by a superior tribunal, to be considered as flying in the face of the law, so that parties before it shall not only be protected in disobeying it but punished for their obedience? If this be the case, the old maxim cedunt arma togae (let arms yield to the toga – modern: let military power give way to civil power) will very ill apply to courts of justice. Instead of being the peaceful arbiters of right and the sacred asylum of unprotected innocence, their very forums will be the seat of war and confusion.”

Why is this all so important to the establishment of a New World Order Government?

Well let’s see… so far the Supreme court has allowed corporations to be people with rights, allowed these corporations to merge and acquire each other to establish monopolies and trusts,  allowed these corporations not only to clone life but to create new genetically altered life and then patent that life-form as a novel (unique) property of the corporation and government, it has ruled that children can be vaccinated without parental consent, it has allowed the United Nations to claim a part of the City of New York as international land immune from U.S. law, and seems to not be at all concerned with the thousands of Presidential Directives and Executive Orders that have allowed everything from martial law in America to unmanned drones for the use of killing Americans abroad and spying on them nationally.

Now why in God’s name would I put my trust in this body of “Justices” to do the right thing in protecting me or my country or to  combat the implementation of world governance? They are, after all, appointed by the same president and congress that is allowing it to happen in the first place! They aren’t even voted in by the people who suffer their opinions!!!

So what does it mean to you to” fight for your country”?

Well, you better start comprehending that your country and your state is in the control of a rogue government, and that to save the land the government must not be allowed to expand globally by expanding its ream of paper to include all of the United Nations as it’s master.

The “United States” is in the process of becoming  nothing more than an admiralty law-based “land-bridge” between oceans and countries, a port of call for the world government and its corporations built with your taxpayer money.

And all of this proving the pen is mightier than the sword, simply because the people will not wield the sword as their fore-fathers supposedly did.

In our interview, we discussed that in order to create a new World Government, the current borders of the United States must be destroyed. It is, however, important to state that the individual state governments and borders need not be demolished simply because the Federal government and borders are abolished. It is in fact the contractual nature of the individual states to this central government which is the cause of the loss of individual state sovereignty. As individual republics, under a new United States “union” the country would be no less grand.

Is it only me that feels this way?

…whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness… all experience hath shown, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”

–Constitution of the united states of America

“Whenever the ends of government are perverted, and public liberty manifestly endangered, and all other means of redress are ineffectual, the people may, and of right ought to reform the old, or establish a new government. The doctrine of nonresistance against arbitrary power, and oppression, is absurd, slavish, and destructive of the good and happiness of mankind.”

–New Hampshire Constitution, Article 10 of the Bill of Rights

“All power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority and instituted for their peace, safety, happiness and the protection of property. For the advancement of these ends, they have at all times an inalienable and indefeasible right to alter, reform or abolish their government in such manner as they may deem proper.”

–Kentucky Constitution, Kentucky Bill of Rights

“All power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority and instituted for their peace, safety and happiness. For the advancement of these ends they have at all times an inalienable and indefeasible right to alter, reform or abolish their government in such manner as they may think proper.”

–Pennsylvania Constitution, Article 1, Section 2 of the Declaration of Rights

“3d. That Government ought to be instituted for the common benefit, protection and security of the people; and that the doctrine of non-resistance against arbitrary power and oppression is absurd, slavish, and destructive to the good and happiness of mankind.”

–North Carolina Constitution, November 21, 1789

All political power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority, and instituted for their benefit. The faith of the people of Texas stands pledged to the preservation of a republican form of government, and, subject to this limitation only, they have at all times the inalienable right to alter, reform or abolish their government in such manner as they may think expedient.”

–Texas Constitution, Article 1, Section 2

“Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by rule of law.”

–Universal Declaration Of Human Rights, United Nations (paying lip service to this decree with despicable arrogance and confidence as it subsumes all other constitutions!)

So what part of this aren’t you comprehending?

And just what do you think the 2nd amendment is for?

Better listen to the show now folks, and start to grasp exactly what’s happening in a local, county, district, state, and national government near you. For right this very second, government is doing all of the above for you, on paper, handing over the “country” to a global corporate federation, making the above options of abolition obsolete and unlawful with each treaty and contract your representatives sign, conveying the land to foreign interests…

And remember, just because you don’t see it doesn’t change the fact that it”s happening…

This is what you are truly fighting:

And the future of food (just replace metal powder with protein powder):

Truth is so much stranger than fiction, and so much closer to science fiction than imaginable.

In closing, I can only say that no matter what your “country” means to you; no matter how you define it – I think now would be a good time to start fighting for it while it’s still recognizable as such, and while we still have a resemblance to natural humans.

.

–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Monday, February 11th, 2013

Dear Matt Damon…


Dear Matt Damon,

First of all, let me just say that I have enjoyed your work in various movies over the years. And congratulations on all of your success, both popularly and especially financially. But I want to talk specifically to you about one of your rolls, as the voice-over talent for the recent documentary movie entitled “Inside Job”.

Again, well done sir. This was a very well presented documentary on corruption most foul within the banking industry and in the United States government. But to be honest Matt, I have never seen a more well-done and yet totally incomplete presentation of the facts about such an important event in our nations history. In short, you were the narrator of one of the biggest propaganda pieces in history, and I was wondering how that feels…

You see Matt, I figure that your participation in this thing can only be explained by two possibilities:

1) You were just reading a script, and really don’t comprehend what was truly happening outside of what that script stated within the government and banking industry. And you thought you were truly part of something quite special.

2) You were fully aware of your participation in a government cover-up of the most important aspects of what really happened during this period of organized crime, and you were rewarded handsomely for your popularity and participation in this totally incomplete propaganda piece.

Now, I see that you are supportive of many charities and organizations around the world, and that pleases me as one of your fans. And so I am writing you this letter to let you know that I want to give you the benefit of the doubt with regards to your participation in this misleading documentary. I truly believe that you were doing what you thought was best (and I’m sure the paycheck wasn’t too bad either).

But if this assumption is true, I am wondering what you would do if you found out that you were unwittingly part of a massive misinformation campaign designed to obfuscate the most important aspects of this criminal event. Would you seek to publicly rectify the situation if you saw the proof that “Inside Job” was just a half-truth, designed to allow the very government who has ravished the third-world you are so desperately trying to help through your charities and support, get away with the financial crime of the century? Have you made enough millions yet that you would be willing to sacrifice your future movie career to truly educate humanity about the real Inside Job that took place and how it is directly responsible for the poverty and destitution that you publicly rally against?

As a fan, I’d like to know the answer to these questions…

So Matt, if you will indulge me for just 15 more minutes, I’d like to explain a few things to you, so that you might publicly address the true nature of the so-called financial collapse of 2007-2008 with a fully informed head. For that, I’ve prepared this video, which is just a short snip-it of a 4-hour documentary that I made on the same subject. Please know that this movie cost me nothing to make – except my valuable personal time – and is offered for free to the public without charge. I’m not selling anything. You see, it doesn’t take 20 million dollars to uncover the truth… not like the budget for “Inside Job”, just a deep passion for the truth and a hell of a lot of research.

Now, if you will, please view this 15 minute excerpt from this free movie, The Great Pension Fund Hoax:

So as you can see, Matt, Inside Job failed to mention the most important information for the comprehension of this whole Ponzi scheme – the fact that government had massive controlling stock investments in these banks, investment corporations, mortgage corporations, and bail-out receivers. In other words, the financial collapse of these corporations was not a collapse at all, but was instead a merger of government investment held and owned corporations through what is called “corporate governance”, as well as the complete and utter theft of billions and billions of dollars from the public. This term, corporate governance, was even mentioned once to my surprise in the movie – but with no explanation of what it actually means.

Again, now that you have received this holy grail of comprehension with regards to your documentary’s cover-up, and now that you can see the true nature of government’s complete conflict of interest as major share-holder of every major and important corporation on the planet – while also regulating the markets and industries those investment held banks and corporations operate under (including the major water companies like Nestle, Coca-cola, and Pepsi that are stealing all of the clean water from the African children you are banging your head against the wall trying to help) – what are you going to do about it?

What will you do…?

I mean, considering that the government also has major controlling shares in the very media industry that has made you such a wealthy and popular icon, do you have the integrity to stand up against the hand that feeds you in order to set into motion the necessary public comprehension that is needed to truly save the world from this organized propaganda and government-military industrial machine?

By the way, here are the investments in media companies, if you can spare another 10 minutes:

So what’s it gonna be, Matt?

Will you be the hero of our generation, exposing this truth to millions?

Or will you continue to support the very government corporate owned structure that is killing the families you’re trying to protect in your charitable organizations?

The choice… and the consequence of inaction is now yours, Matt. Because now you know.

Signed, a fan that hopes #1 is the answer you seek to rectify,

–Clint Richardson–

.

Watch the full movie here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fhkWueEjewM

.

–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Thursday, March 22, 2012

CAFR Confession


A friend and listener to our local AM station took our interview with the mayor of Salt Lake County, where he admits to the county CAFR and over $650 million in extra fund balances. He also included the CAFR pages I read from as reference.

Though I already posted the interview (audio only), I feel like this is the most important public official confession as to the wealth of the government as shown in government’s financial statements.

Please pass this on…

Also, learn more about government Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports (CAFR’s) with CAFR School, here:

Part 1: The State of Wisconsin CAFR –

https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2011/03/01/wisconsins-real-financial-situation-explained/

Part 2: Introduction to CAFR – City of Aurora, Co –

https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2011/03/03/cafr-school-a-lesson-in-financial-accounting/

Part 3: Advanced study – State of Minnesota CAFR –

https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2011/03/09/cafr-school-part-2-minnesotas-state-cafrs-explained/

Now compare these to your own local, county state, and school district CAFR’s.

.

–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Tuesday, July 12, 2011