I seem as of late to be using the phrase “in their right mind” a lot.
For instance, I often say that nobody in their right mind should be melancholy to what is happening in the world. No one in their right mind should be ok with the fact that the U.S. government in its U.S. Code has an active biological weapons program that makes it “legal” and “acceptable” to test those biologics, radiation, vaccines, and any other thing for “research purposes” on any and every population in the world, including and especially its own. And no body politic of “people” in its right mind would sit back and allow what the United States government has become in all aspects of politics and war.
Yet the deeds are done, and the crime against us is only getting more and more organized and lethal.
And this leads me to believe that my over-use of this declaratory judgement in assumption of the default belief in the state of right-mindedness might very well be misplaced. And so perhaps it is time to consider the very strange and unbelievable reality that maybe, just maybe, the majority of the population is not in fact in their right minds. And if this is the case, well then it might just be possible that they no longer even have the ability to control their own minds…
More and more I contemplate that those who might read this blog and others like it are in fact seeking answers to questions that cannot be found with an “educated” and “entertained” mind. It is not so much that there is no answer to be found, but rather that the answers that can be found do not conform to the reasoning and intent of the asker of the questions. In other words, the questions that seem unanswerable only appear that way because their askers will not look in the places where those answers might so obviously be hiding.
The difference between history (his story) and fiction, and between science and science fiction, has been so divisively blurred and so masterfully intertwined that most of us have been educated through entertainment to ignore anything resembling reality if it has been before musingly portrayed as a story of science or other fiction. Ironically, while the science fiction of yesterday could be considered the uninhibited dream of what the future could hold, today it seems that fiction is dead, and that the rules and science of fiction have been devolved and redacted, fitting only into the defined tenets of today’s real scientific limitations. Today, fiction writers are not dreaming of future possibilities and dystopias, they are describing the planned future of a dystopian science reality. The limits now placed on the imagination of the writer of fiction seem to be solely based on the current but flexible limitations of the practice of modern science. And so the once vibrant dream of utopian philosophers has seemingly also come to its visionary death, for today’s practitioners within the institution of science have taken up not the study of nature but the art of the alteration and control of nature. Anti-nature…
And so those of us who still feel; we who still conform to and therefore know the natural aspects of empathy, logic, reason, virtue, responsibility, and all that makes up the uniqueness and wonder of man are left hopelessly wondering why everything in the world seems somehow, for lack of a better term, just innately wrong. We search for individual answers that, when thoughtfully placed in connective order, we hope might make up the clear summation of the problem at hand. And yet no matter what, the ultimate answer still seems to lay out of sensual understanding. From our sense of reality, we seek a type of knowledge that very likely cannot be obtained through the ordinary processes and facts that otherwise we may find using the traditional scientific method. For that method was created to specifically study the natural state and order of things. So we must ask ourselves some very disturbing questions:
How can we possibly use this traditional scientific method to find answers when all of nature is being corrupted by the abuse of modern scientific methods?
If science is the study of nature and how it works without the intervention of man, and if at the same time nature itself is being fundamentally altered by the false institution of science, what then should the new definition of modern science be?
More to the point, how can a reasonable researcher use traditional scientific means in logical sequence to accomplish the goals of this new non-traditional science?
What was before the study of the laws of nature is now the study of the destruction of those constants. What was before the craft of benefiting mankind through understanding the natural process is now the craft of overcoming that process to control mankind through control of nature.
So for those who seek provable answers using the traditional scientific method, it is advised that you should go back to watching re-runs of “History Channel Presents.” For today, we are going to delve into what is indeed possible yet seemingly not. And as of yet, there is no proof or test that I can offer you to satisfy your “scientific” curiosity. Instead, for a brief moment, I ask you to consider that what might be the answer to your unanswered questions may very well be so different than you expect that you won’t even wish to bring up the subject to friends and family for fear of ridicule. And honestly, the only reason I am writing this now, with the same contemplation and fear in mind, is that I have a strange feeling that only those of us left out here that are still in our right mind will believe that the following information is perhaps more self-evident than any other explanation.
The great rhetorical mind of the Scottish author and physician Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, a graduate of the University of Edinburgh Medical School no less, might be of import in this endeavor. His character Sherlock Holmes was essentially represented as the crowning authority in the use of forensic science. The word forensic comes from the Latin forēnsis, meaning “of or before the forum (court),” dating to the roman republic. Created in the late 1890’s, detective Holmes was required to use his brain, his logic and his reason to solve the case, for the modern technology of crime scene investigation was not yet in existence, and this allowed many criminals to flee justice.
Today, I ask the same of you, my dear Watson’s…
In the novels based on Sherlock Holmes; those fictional tales about the unorthodox, de-educated, non-conformative detective, it was said of man that, “His ignorance was as remarkable as his knowledge.”
Even more remarkably, the fictional detective stated that, “In solving a problem of this sort, the grand thing is to be able to reason backward. That is a very useful accomplishment, and a very easy one, but people do not practise it much. In the everyday affairs of life it is more useful to reason forward, and so the other comes to be neglected. There are fifty who can reason synthetically for one who can reason analytically.” It is my opinion that if you are reading this blog, you may very well be one in fifty.
Of course, his most famous musing concluded that, “When you have eliminated all which is impossible, then whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.”
But perhaps in light of our current disposition as sentient beings searching for answers to questions that seemingly won’t be answered, it is this quote we should be romancing: “I fear that if the matter is beyond humanity it is certainly beyond me. Yet we must exhaust all natural explanations before we fall back upon such a theory as this.”
In the spirit of this Holmesian deductive reasoning, I hope that the reader will allow herein a presentation of my own theory on why everything in science and in the actions of the leaders of men seem to be centralized on creating a fictional dystopia of mis-used science rather than on the use of science to realize the dream of fictional utopia.
(Que ‘Twilight Zone’ music)
This Is Not Science Fiction!
In movies, the monster is usually something that you can see. The alien from Alien. The clown from IT. The Martians from Mars Attacks. The Englishmen from Downton Abbey. And who can forget Mega Shark vs. Crocosaurus?
The use of the genre of sci-fi horror movies depicting gruesome monsters and viscously putrefying aliens has created a false dicotomy of left or right opinions regarding what the typical person might be able to believe is possible within the institutional reality of biological science, which today has seemingly crossed the barrier of perception with its primary basis now in the world of the unseen – the less-than-microscopic nano-world of genetic code. “Science” has mapped the genomes of many species, and is now hot on the trail of mapping the epigenetic on/off mechanisms of DNA/RNA encoding that controls gene expression and disease. It is one thing to see how genes are put together to make up life on earth, but an entirely more dangerous thing to have one’s hands on the knowledge and function of turning those gene’s expressions on and off. In this manner, science has become a very frightening brave new world.
The Genome project is now a thing of the past, old news, ancient technology. The Epigenome Project is now where it’s at!
The Human Epigenome Project website explains its surface goals:
The Human Epigenome Project (HEP) aims to identify, catalogue and interpret genome-wide DNA methylation patterns of all human genes in all major tissues. Methylation is the only flexible genomic parameter that can change genome function under exogenous influence. Hence it constitutes the main and so far missing link between genetics, disease and the environment that is widely thought to play a decisive role in the aetiology of virtually all human pathologies. Methylation occurs naturally on cytosine bases at CpG sequences and is involved in controlling the correct expression of genes. Differentially methylated cytosines give rise to distinct patterns specific for tissue type and disease state. Such methylation variable positions (MVPs) are common epigenetic markers. Like single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), they promise to significantly advance our ability to understand and diagnose human disease.
The Human Epigenome Project (HEP) is a public/private collaboration run by the members of the Human Epigenome Consortium. MVPs identified as part of the HEP will be released publicly in accordance with the HEP data release policy.
And just who or what makes up the members of this “consortium?”
Current consortium members:
The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute is a recognised leader in genome sequencing, high-throughput systems, informatics and analysis of gene function using genetic approaches in a variety of model organisms and humans.
Epigenomics AG is a transatlantic biotechnology company with headquarters in Berlin, Germany and its wholly owned subsidiary in Seattle, Washington, USA, pioneering tomorrow’s personalized medicine by exploiting the information of DNA methylation patterns.
The Centre National de Génotypage is a national research institute set up in 1998 by the French Government in anticipation of using the genome sequencing information for the identification of genes and gene function.
Now, if you are not familiar with Margaret Sanger, you really should be. As one of the most famous soft eugenisists, her legacy includes Planned Parenthood and modern birth control. But let’s take a deeper look at this feminist de-populationist, and imagine for a moment if she had her finger on the trigger of modern genetic and epigenetic technology. Planned Parenthood would look a lot differently than it does today.
Surprisingly, even Wikipedia must admit to the truth of the easily found history of her motives (citations and sources left in):
Sanger’s 1920 book endorsed eugenics.
As part of her efforts to promote birth control, Sanger found common cause with proponents of eugenics, believing that they both sought to “assist the race toward the elimination of the unfit.” Sanger was a proponent of negative eugenics, which aims to improve human hereditary traits through social intervention by reducing the reproduction of those who were considered unfit. Sanger’s eugenic policies included an exclusionary immigration policy, free access to birth control methods and full family planning autonomy for the able-minded, and compulsory segregation or sterilization for the profoundly retarded. In her book The Pivot of Civilization, she advocated coercion to prevent the “undeniably feeble-minded” from procreating. Although Sanger supported negative eugenics, she asserted that eugenics alone was not sufficient, and that birth control was essential to achieve her goals.
In contrast with eugenicist William Robinson, who advocated euthanasia for the unfit,[note 9] Sanger wrote, “we [do not] believe that the community could or should send to the lethal chamber the defective progeny resulting from irresponsible and unintelligent breeding.” Similarly, Sanger denounced the aggressive and lethal Nazi eugenics program. In addition, Sanger believed the responsibility for birth control should remain in the hands of able-minded individual parents rather than the state, and that self-determining motherhood was the only unshakable foundation for racial betterment.
Sanger also supported restrictive immigration policies. In “A Plan for Peace”, a 1932 essay, she proposed a congressional department to address population problems. She also recommended that immigration exclude those “whose condition is known to be detrimental to the stamina of the race,” and that sterilization and segregation be applied to those with incurable, hereditary disabilities…
Sanger’s writings echoed ideas about inferiority and loose morals of particular races that were widespread in the contemporary United States. In one “What Every Girl Should Know” commentary, she references popular opinion that Aboriginal Australians were “just a step higher than the chimpanzee” with “little sexual control,” as compared to the “normal man and Woman.” Elsewhere she bemoaned that traditional sexual ethics“…have in the past revealed their woeful inability to prevent the sexual and racial chaos into which the world has today drifted…”
From 1939 to 1942 Sanger was an honorary delegate of the Birth Control Federation of America, which included a supervisory role—alongside Mary Lasker and Clarence Gamble—in the Negro Project, an effort to deliver birth control to poor black people. Sanger wanted the Negro Project to include black ministers in leadership roles, but other supervisors did not. To emphasize the benefits of involving black community leaders, she wrote to Gamble “we do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.” This quote has been cited by Angela Davis to support her claims that Sanger wanted to exterminate black people. However, New York University’s Margaret Sanger Papers Project, argues that in writing that letter, “Sanger recognized that elements within the black community might mistakenly associate the Negro Project with racist sterilization campaigns in the Jim Crow South, unless clergy and other community leaders spread the word that the Project had a humanitarian aim.”
One might perhaps laugh at the caption of this article,
promoting birth control while posing with her own two birthed sons.
Of course, birth control was really intended for the “lesser” races…
Ironically, but not surprisingly, Sanger’s racially pure mother Anne Higgins went through 18 pregnancies (with 11 live births) in 22 years before dying at the age of 49. Sanger was the sixth of eleven children. But then, she was apparently gifted with good blood from a good race, so that’s just alright now isn’t it?
So why should you, if indeed you are in your right mind, be concerned that the most prominent organization participating in the Genome and Epigenome Projects honor in their titles this eugenicist that promoted racial purity and depopulation? Are you frickin’ kidding me? Do you think plants, fruits, and vegetables are the only life that can be purposefully, scientifically, and genetically altered from their natural form?
Let’s get more acquainted with the institute celebrating her legacy, shall we?
Embracing a postgenomic era
The Sanger Institute will examine how genomes are implicated in the biology of disease in greater detail, with greater precision and at faster rate than previously thought possible. Genomes are rapidly becoming a part of the essential fabric of biology, rather than an expensive resource.
Our target is to understand the function of genes on a genome-wide scale. The intellectual commitment and drive of our researchers, combined with developments in technology, will allow us to make a contribution to the understanding of how genes work that is as significant as our contribution to the Human Genome Project.
This contribution will be founded in efforts to tackle the basis of common genetic and infectious disease and to build resources and tools that will help others to tackle disease. Our dual role, as researcher and resource provider, has served biology well and we believe it will become more valuable in the future.
In the next two years, we will sequence more than 1000 human genomes. By 2012, we will make stem cells in more than 10,000 genes.
Our research in Human Genetics will harness the power of our improving sequencing and genotyping infrastructure in order to gain a better understanding of the diversity of the human species and how this diversity influences our health and disease. By 2011, the Institute will have sequenced more than 1000 human genomes. As part of the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium and other similar large-scale consortia, we will continue to discover important genetic variants on the scale that is required to give insight into the genetics of common disease.
By 2013, the International Cancer Genome Consortium will have produced comprehensive catalogues of mutations in more than 50 different tumour types. This work, in which we play a leading role, will lay the foundation for clinical research to produce treatments that could help to reduce the global cancer burden.
Building on new technologies, we will help to develop a rapidly growing understanding of diseases including cancer, heart disease and diabetes. Our research outputs and resources, such as the DECIPHER database, will move into clinical practice as our biological understanding becomes clinically essential.
Our capacity to analyse genomes means that we can examine the diversity of pathogens, both within and between species, on a scale unmatched within Europe. Our future research will lead to new understanding of infectious disease and its development and spread: using new technologies we can map individual organisms and the development of disease in an individual or among a population with exquisite accuracy. Embracing these technologies, our researchers will complete a staggering 10,000 pathogen sequences by 2011.
We will move rapidly to examining the interactions between pathogen and host – a vital meeting point that influences the genetics of both organisms. Our research in malaria will strengthen understanding of genetics of host-pathogen interactions. Our programmes will help to build capacity among researchers in the UK and in front-line countries facing the challenge of infectious disease. Our research into malaria shares the Global Malaria Action Plan’s morbidity reduction targets for 2010 and 2015.
Our research in pathogens will also build on the MRSA and C. difficile sequences in order to help health authorities make rational and considered plans for dealing with healthcare-associated infections.
Working with our collaborators, we will deliver, over the next few years, resources that will transform research using model organisms.
Cloning of genetically created mice justifies total abuse of life, for the
life is created by man and therefore owned by man. How long before
humans are treated merely as model organisms used as resources?
Oops! Too late…
These remarkable resources notwithstanding, it is our research programmes that hold increasing promise.
Our research in the mouse will give a biological understanding of the genes implicated in cancer found through other programmes, such as the International Cancer Genome Consortium. Using mouse models, we will identify and unlock the networks of genes that drive cancer.
We will develop systems to accelerate stem cell research by allowing better manipulation of cell lines and by enhancing the production of embryonic stem (ES) cells.
The resources will support new research in developmental biology, hearing and cognition.
You might say that mice are the gateway drug to human resource cloning as model organisms. For if we don’t protect that which cannot protect itself, then perhaps we deserve a similar fate.
To view this disturbing mouse resource collection, go here:
The Institute is a leading contributor to the European Conditional Mouse Mutagenesis Program (EUCOMM), the NIH-funded Knockout mouse programmes of KOMP and KOMP2, the International Knockout Mouse Consortium (IKMC), and the International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium (IMPC).
We have generated BACs for various mouse strains that are displayed on the Mouse Resources Portal and Ensembl and are available from Source BioScienceLifeSciences and the BACPAC Resources Center. Mouse ES cells are available from MMRC UC Davis.
Data generated at the Sanger Institute is available from our from the Mouse Genomes Project.
Now, those in their right mind should be very concerned with the potential of this type of power. This is like children getting ahold of God’s constructor set and becoming little creators of hell on Earth. This is not just power, but the absolute power of negative creation, undoing the natural mathematical order of the DNA of all things.
But then, no body seems to be in their right mind when considering this. For man is patenting his creation as he goes, using word magic to be the master of life itself…
(CNN) — Here’s a little-known fact: Under current law, it’s possible to hold a patent on a piece of human DNA, otherwise known as a gene.
Some breast cancers… are linked with the genes BRCA1 and BRCA2.
Companies that have acquired patents for genes have specific rights to their use, which may include diagnostic tests based on those genes, as well as future mutations that are discovered.
In a new lawsuit, the American Civil Liberties Union alleges that the policy is unconstitutional.
The targets of the lawsuit, Myriad Genetics and the University of Utah Research Foundation, hold patents to BRCA1 and BRCA2, the genes responsible for many cases of hereditary breast and ovarian cancers.
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is also named in the suit.
The lawsuit asserts that the patents prevent some people from accessing medical screening for BRCA1 and BRCA2. It also challenges the general patentability of genes, which has been legal since 1980. That year, in Diamond v. Chakrabarty, the Supreme Court found in favor of Ananda Mohan Chakrabarty, who used bacteria to engineer a microbe that dissolves oil. Watch Dr. Gupta explain the lawsuit »
Genes form the basic unit of heredity. With modern technology, researchers have determined that particular genes carry an associated risk of illness.
A striking 20 percent of all human genes have been patented. However, now that all 20,000 to 25,000 human genes have been mapped and sequenced through the Human Genome Project, they are in the public domain, meaning they would no longer be considered “new” for the purposes of patents, said Lee Silver, professor of molecular biology and public policy at Princeton University. Now, patents on human genes must specify a new use, such as a diagnostic test.
If a company wants to patent the purified form of an antibiotic that exists in nature in a fungus, no one challenges that, Silver said. Plant DNA, as well as human DNA, can be synthesized in a laboratory. Distinguishing this case from a patented human gene that is useful in diagnostics would require the ethical argument that the human genome is sacred — and even then, things get murky, considering that about 25 percent of human genes are shared by chimpanzees, he said.
“THE PATENT LAW SAYS NOTHING ABOUT ETHICS,” he said…
Again, it is said that power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
So, in reference to this notion of power, what would you consider on a scale of 1-10 the power-base of knowledge in being able to control the entire expression of the human genome within the entire population of Earth – real or synthetic? Would you say that it is a 10 on that scale perhaps if one could wipe out the expression for empathy and religious capacity? How about the expression for logical thinking and reason… would that be a corruption of power? And what about love…?
What about synthetic people, or clones? Who needs the real thing when you can hand deliver the perfect, docile, subservient beast of a patented human?
From its website, the Sanger Institute explains it’s purpose:
What we do
Our research at the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute builds understanding of gene function in health and disease as well as creating resources of lasting value to biomedical research.
We study diseases that have an impact on health globally by investigating genomes. Building on our past achievements and based on priorities that exploit the unique expertise of our Faculty of researchers, we will lead global efforts to understand the biology of genomes. We are convinced of the importance of making this research available and accessible for all audiences…
Our research into genetics and disease
Our genomic information has a significant impact on our health. Global health problems including cancer, malaria, diabetes, obesity and infectious disease are partially determined genetically. At the Sanger Institute we are uniquely placed to build on genome sequences and to engage in biomedical research that elucidates the genetic basis of such common diseases as well as rare or neglected diseases.
Why we study genomes
Genomes are the archival instructions upon which an organism is built. The sequence data provided by the Human Genome Project is a rich source of information that drives improved understanding of human health and variation. Studying human sequences, comparing model organism genomes and investigating the effects of pathogens on humans will build knowledge of the diversity of our genomes and how this affects our susceptibility to disease…
From its annual review, we read:
Genomes continue to revolutionise the study of biology. Their contribution to medicine is just kicking off.
In 2011 our sequencing pipeline delivered 200,000,000,000,000 (200 trillion) bases of DNA – more than all the previous years of the Institute combined.
Coupled with the output from our genotyping pipeline, which is using the latest DNA chip technology, our researchers are able to interrogate genomes at a scale and resolution that is many orders of magnitude greater than before. This rich vein of information is enabling our researchers to discover and interpret at ever greater depth the significance of genomic variation within and between species.
Drawing on our vast genomic resources enables us to play a leading role in national and international collaborations. The techniques, databases and software we develop allow us to make vital contributions to research into the spread of infectious disease, the development of cancer, and the epidemiology of malaria, sickle cell disease and metabolic risk factors in Africa.
Our ability to answer new questions is turning received genomic understanding on its head. For example, when the Cancer Genome Project team investigated structural DNA rearrangements in the chromosomes in cancer, they uncovered an entirely new mechanism for cancer development. The team discovered that some people’s cancer genomes bore the scars of a catastrophic event that had driven them a number of steps towards cancer in a single cell cycle. The chromosomes had exploded and incorrect pasting together of the DNA had produced many cancer-driving mutations.
Another convention-busting discovery was made when our researchers sought to complete the genomic picture of the spectrum of Leishmania parasites. Seeking to understand the genomic variations responsible for the differing severity of symptoms caused by the different strains, the team made a surprising discovery. Producing high-quality reference genome sequences showed that the different strains had almost identical genetic codes, but that the strains’ genomes contained different numbers of copies of the chromosomes. This finding suggests that the parasite’s evolutionary development and success is founded on the numbers of particular genes and chromosomes it has – a genetic abnormality that would kill most organisms.
Our Pathogens teams are harnessing our high-throughput sequencing and analysis resources to compare variation between individual bacterial and viral genomes from patients to track and trace precisely the spread of disease. By comparing cholera genomes during the current global pandemic, our researchers have been able to categorically trace its origin back to the Bay of Bengal. Using the same technique, we have mapped the spread of the H1N1 flu virus across the UK during the most recent epidemic and have shown that the disease entered at a number of geographic locations at different times, before the first clinical case was identified.
Our ability to conduct genomic research at high resolution and vast scope enables us to provide the foundations for the global research community to build upon. For example, the fruits of our investment in the 1000 Genomes Project are being harvested by researchers across the globe as they use the data to enhance the resolution of the genome-wide association studies and understand the origins of genetic mutation…
Open source genetic codes for genomes?
Instructional genomic blueprints for cancer offered to the world?
Offering the entire mechanism for the spread of disease on the cellular level to the militaries (governments) of the world?
Sharing the origins of genetic mutation with anyone interested?
20 trillion base DNA sets deconstructed in a single year?
Perhaps my concern is not being completely burned into the readers conscious here, and perhaps that’s because the reader may not be reading this from the point of view of a racially driven, psychopathic purist de-populationist! Get it? The “Sanger” institute? In honor of dear old Margaret? This should make even the roots of your own DNA shake violently with fear and loathing. Satan, if you believe in that sort of thing, could not ask for a better tool as the defined “adversary of man,” with this toolset being the epitome of the model chemistry set to de-construct nature and reform it in man’s own image. This new world order of DNA and genomic expression belongs in no mans hands, for no man is immune from the ultimate disease of unrestrained power. There are no true ethics in the modern notion of what is “science,” because the institution of science today specifically disregards nature’s (God’s) design in order to exploit and alter the intent of that self-evident design. It studies nature only in order to change or destroy it. The diseases it is claiming to be able to treat and cure on the genetic level were of course caused by this very same institution of medical and scientific crimes against man and nature in the first place, and so the placing of our faith in such institutions to cure us from its own self-inflicted ills is fool-hearted at best. Cancer was all but non-existant before modern practices of those who profess to be professors, professionals, scientists, and doctors spread it experimentally as vaccine ingredients, rearing its ugly head according to some in history only after modern vaccination was introduced.
And that brings me to my point. We have all been stung by this beast of medical science. Vaccination is designed to apparently replace what nature has already installed within the expressions of the body as the natural immune response to outside influences. One has no allergy to bee stings, for instance, unless one is stung by the bee, which delivers its disease-causing agents through a stinging injection. Spiders penetrate by a stinging bite, as do dogs with rabies. Tetanus and hepatitis thrive many places, but can only enter the body through a stinging penetration of the skin (or through the penetration of intercourse, i.e. the exchange of bodily fluids). The vaccination needle is the simulated, weaponized sexual appendage of the science of modern medicine. We are violated by it, raped by it; we are injected (stung) with substances and DNA that would never otherwise have the capacity to enter our bodies and mix with our substance. We are literally being grafted like fruit trees with the foundational building blocks of the gene expression and DNA of other life forms, including that of our fellow man as with the injection of cloned human diploid cells (including DNA and proteins) from various aborted fetal tissues, human albumin (from blood), rhesus monkey fetal lung cells, continuous (cloned) line of monkey kidney cells, rhesus monkey fetal diploid cells, simian cancer virus-40 (and at least 79 others), vesicle fluid from calf skins, calf serum, bovine serum, bovine fetal serum, U.S. sourced bovine extract, washed sheep red blood cells (RBC’s), chick embryo, chick embryonic fluid, chicken protein, mouse serum proteins, guinea pig embryo cells, shark squalene, gelatin, hydrolized gelatin, processed gelatin, lactose, and others. These are just a few of the ingredients that you have been infected with by stingers called needles.
Vaccination is, in its most simple description, the purposeful infection of the body with foreign particles and substances. Whether those substances are good or bad, beneficial or harmful, therapeutic or deadly does not remove the fact that vaccination is nothing more than purposeful infection with disease. This is not contagion, for a vaccinated person is not necessarily contagious, though some “shedding” of the vaccine does take place after infection (vaccination). The injection of peanut oils and lactose as ingredients in vaccines, for instance, is certainly linked to localized milk and peanut allergies that are not spreadable as contagious infection to others, but are rather local reactions to otherwise harmless foods, if only they were eaten instead of injected past any natural barriers. Thus, we must think outside of the box we are placed into by media education and realize that infection is a neutral word that actually also represents any forcing of so-called “medicine” into the body.
But consider how the body then might react to monkey kidney tissue or cow blood being injected into it, bypassing the natural protective barriers for such agents through the deep, penetrating sting of the inoculation needle. It is well known that even the Rh factor of some human blood types prevents negative and positive bloods from mixing to create life. The mother’s body will literally attack the newly formed embryo of a different blood type (Rh) to kill it as a foreign infection. So imagine how incompatible your body and its blood and fluid is to cow, monkey, pig, sheep, insect, and other animal blood and protein products used in vaccines, which have no other way to enter and infect your body but through the penetrating sting of vaccination.
But let’s not stop there. For other ingredients within vaccines also have no hope of forcibly entering past your body’s defenses without the sting of a nurse or pharmacy technician with a couple of weeks of government sponsered training and indoctrination mixed with a healthy dose of cognitive dissonance. The arrogant advocate for vaccination is always one who’s livelihood depends on delivering it, no differently than those animals and insects that sting or bite in protection of their own livelihood… or to spread parasites. And the propaganda machine of fallacy and quack science fills the heads of those who subject themselves and their own children to such violations of the natural law as vaccines are.
Let’s not forget the heavy metals and other extra ingredients also used in vaccines with thinly veiled reasonings and names such as preservatives and adjuvents. Those include such other foreign particles and poisons (medicines) as formaldehyde, aluminum hydroxide, aluminum phosphate, thimerosal (mercury-based), polysorbate 80 (Tween-80), ammonium sulfate, formalin, sucrose, sorbitol, benzethonium chloride, glycerin, phenol (a compound obtained by distillation of coal tar), beta-propiolactone, 2-phenoxyethanol, polysorbate 20, yeast, chemically defined yeast-based medium, soy protein, phenol red indicator, phosphate buffered saline, monosodium L-glutamate (MSG), potassium glutamate, potassium chloride, potassium phosphate monobasic, potassium phosphate dibasic, potassium monophosphate, potassium diphosphate, sodium bicarbonate, sodium phosphate dibasic, polydimethylsiloxane (silicone), and even the known cancer causing agent aspartame.
It is therefore likely that in yours, and especially in your child’s lifetime, most or all of these listed vaccine ingredients have been injected into your body, along with the various disease causing microbes, antibiotics (anti-life), and other ingredients not listed here. And your body reacts to every one of these ingredients, either in the short or long term as the manifestation of chronic disease states. I can think of nothing else to call this but sheer insanity. The blanket acceptance of the “science” of vaccination in my mind can only be attributed to two things. Ignorance is certinaly a fine-tuned and well oiled machine within the general population. But can we really blame sheer ignorance? What about custom, routine, greed, profits, and medical advice?
But what if there is another factor at play here? What if there is another unseen force that is driving people to promote and commit to actions like vaccination, eating junk food as their main staple, taking pharmaceutical drugs that will knowingly cause more severe disease than what they will treat, and submitting themselves to the unspeakable atrocities of modern and cosmetic medicine – which is by the way the leading cause by far of death in the world, called “iatrogenic” death, or death by medicine/doctor.
Is it possible that mankind could be driven subconsciously by another infective force more powerful than ignorance, more persuasive than propaganda, and more controlling than hypnosis?
And if this possibility may indeed be the case, would man even know he was infected?
This is the theory I’d like to explore herein…
The Parasite Lives By Control
And Knows No Other Path
I ask you now to become a neutral.
As I postulated in the opening of this thesis, I believe that any reader of this work may have only gotten this far due to their uninfected empathy and therefore unvaccinated desire to learn the answers to questions that cannot seem to be answered by merely considering what is known or by what is normal or natural. And so the question to the answer we seek may very well sit in the world of the unseen, and may therefore be hidden in the unknown. For the purely logical thinker, who needs proof of claim to every aspect of reality, I can only try my best to qualify the facts presented herein, for I cannot show you the unseeable. I have not the tools to make proof, and so I cannot prove the unprovable. And so I ask your forgiveness in this regard, and ask that you clear your mind of what you think you know so that your limiting perceptions of reality don’t get in your own way. Yet at the same time, I wish to invoke in you your use of the logic machine, the Trivium, and to examine what I present here with the goal not of belief or disbelief, but with the desire to prove or disprove – what the scientific method once also was designed to do instead of genetically altering everything so as to create falsely created evidence of a genetically altered reality.
The question I propose to answer here to the best of my rational ability is simply this:
Can the actions and inactions for which most of mankind are exhibiting in acting against its own best interest be attributed to a parasitic infection of his brain and DNA?
First, let’s place on the exhibit table the evidence of these actions of man against his own interest.
1) Geoengineering. It is being taught in universities around the world now. It is highly regulated in the codes and statutes of government, permits are required, and international treaties are law regarding its use in war and in peacetime. It is no longer a theory, but a certified and provable current practice. In other words, it is a provable conspiracy (plan between two or more people) to significantly and purposefully alter the environment, and is a highly protected industry by governments around the world, including the United Nations. If this fact is not readily apparent to the reader, then please see the links below. For those who can see it happening in the sky above them, again I can only assume according to my presented theory here that you are not parasitically restricted from recognition and comprehension of these strange happenings. Geoengeneering though, as defined and taught in the University system, is not merely the alteration of the air and atmosphere. It is the alteration of the land and oceans as well. For more factual information on this, please see my sourced research here:
2) Species Die Offs. As we sit back and watch with a helpless feeling and a bag of Funyons, we are digitally presented with facts and figures that the surface life on planet Earth, on both the land and in the ocean, is dying. We are shown images and videos of mass schools of dead fish washed up on shores or in harbors, of hundreds of birds falling dead from the sky mid-flight, and of statistical realities of millions of species of plants, animals, and insects becoming extinct. Is it at all strange to think that this may be directly correlated with the actions of man, if as above we can see that the organized actions of man are literally altering the entire biosphere of the planet on a global scale through quite purposeful Geoengineering? Where is the logic, the empathy, and the calvary, for we cannot live without the rest of nature? That is, unless man and nature are being fundamentally altered and with genomic precision reconstituted at the cellular level to survive as hosts within such a dystopia as is apparently being created by what is seemingly, if you will, men who may very well be parasitically infected and controlled at the cellular level. And so the question may no longer be who is causing the problems, but what is infecting the brains of the men who are causing these problems?
3) Natural Healthy Foods Are Being Outlawed. “Codex Alimentarius Austriacus,” is a collection of standards and product descriptions for a wide variety of foods developed In the Austrian-Hungarian Empire between 1897 and 1911 as a voluntary effort between “experts” in the food industry and in universities. Though used in legal proceedings for identity and standards purposes, this collection is not legally enforceable. However, the bastardization of this effort was created into what is today known as the international Codex Alimentarius Commission, part of the Food and Agricultural Organization and the World Health Organization of the United Nations, which is employed as the international food codex, or “law.” This integration as a legal overlord of food took place in Austrian law in 1975. The council was created in 1958 under the joint sponsorship of the International Commission on Agricultural Industries and the International Bureau of Analytical Chemistry. And you wonder why the ingredient list on your cereal box looks like a chemistry experiment? Today, Codex Alimentarius (Latin for “Book of Food”) is a collection of internationally recognized standards, codes of practice, guidelines and other recommendations relating to what is food, production of that food, and what is considered safe as food. Food is one of those things in nature that are, well, pretty damn self-evident. And while it’s probably a good thing to know enough about nature to eat from it without being poisoned, the extent of what is now being labeled as “food” and “food ingredients” defies all possible logic… unless of course the parasitic infection of man is taken into consideration!!! Simply stated, if a parasite were hungry for the nutrient diet it needs to survive, it is logical and provable in nature that the parasite would control the actions of its host in order to cause the man or other host to “infect” itself with “food stuffs” that are in actuality harmful, poisonous, and even fatal to the man but promotive of the parasite. Inversely, it would be a logical conclusion to assume that the parasite would do anything within its power to cause the man to cease to ingest anything that might harm the parasite that would otherwise be beneficial to the man, especially those food stuffs that would kill or prevent the growth and viability of parasites. Therefore, the reasonable conclusion to be made if indeed mankind is suffering from an ancient, highly advanced, parasitic intelligence that controls man’s will would be to assume that those men who organize to write laws, alter the environment, and promote or ban certain food stuffs and ingredients would be the ones being controlled by said parasites so as to act against the best interests of man and nature while at the same time promoting the best interests of the parasite. The host only lives to serve the parasite, as far as the parasite is concerned. This is evident all throughout nature, which we will explore the evidence of in depth later in this essay. And so the answer to one of the many questions the reader may be seeking as to ascertain what the hell is happening in the world may rely on the readers ability to contemplate this theory. Why are foods being re-engineered and genetically altered? Why are they being changed in a way that provably causes such harm to man and nature while men in high authority positions pass laws to protect these genetic alterations? If these men are indeed parasitically controlled, then the answer to these questions is quite clear. And this even answers what seemed before to be the great unanswerable preponderance of all who are asking such questions… Why are they knowingly causing harm to their own environment? Don’t they have to live here too? What about their children’s future? Here again the only truly logical answer is parasitic infection. Some may call them psychopaths. But what if they simply have no capability to act in anyone’s best interest but their own, which is now only in the best interest of the parasite controlling their actions? To give a few examples of this subversion of foods that might harm the parasite, we can think back to the half century mark when propaganda was just starting to take flight. Butter, animal fats, and other staples of diets around the world were suddenly being demonized. Soon, synthetic food products like margarine, American cheese, and shortening were being advertised as replacements for fats. What the reader might not know is that cholesterol, that is to say what was demonized as “bad cholesterol,” is listed in many government sponsored research studies as being the essential ingredient in expelling pathogens from the body. No cholesterol means that disease may flourish. Other examples are Cannabis Sativa, which has properties shown to prevent and destroy diseases like cancer. We are currently experiencing the total genetic alteration of this miracle plant by companies like Monsanto seeking to genetically alter it so as to patent and control its use. The therapeutic uses, therefore, are being bred out of the plant and who knows what is being bred into it. Both marijuana and cholesterol are proven to prevent the spread of prion disease, but only in their natural form. Genetically altered stains will be useless for medical purposes, just as margarine is. Though countless examples persist, where the alteration or banning of foods, spices, seeds, and plants that are extremely healthy and more importantly can cure disease, are outrightly being replaced with synthetics, most of us in our right mind cannot even come close to creating a good reason why this is taking place against humanities best interests. And yet, here again, parasitic infection of the minds of those participating in this “food science” is in fact the only plausible answer. Not greed, not profits, and not ignorance. It seems no other plausible reason exists!
4. Unprecedented Technological Advancement. In 1946, ENIAC (Electronic Numerical Integrator and Computer) was unveiled as the supposed first true all-purpose electronic computer. Weighing in at 30 tons, the size of two semis, and consisting of 19,000 vacuum tubes, 6,000 switches, and requiring many human attendants to answer to incredible amounts of blinking lights. It had the capability in unheard of marvel to add 5,000 numbers in a single second! And it could predict through this powerful computation the trajectory of an artillery shell before it landed. Naturally it was government (military) funded! Just 20 years later, “the hand-held pocket calculator was invented at Texas Instruments, Incorporated (TI) in 1966, following their invention of the first integrated circuit in 1958, subsequently patented in 1964. In 1974, the miniature electronic calculator came into being along with the Texas Instruments’ patent for personal-sized, battery-operated calculators using a single integrated semiconductor circuit array or “one-chip” calculators. 12 years later, in 1986, calculators still represented an estimated 41% of the world’s general-purpose hardware capacity to compute information. Flashing forward only 21 years to 2007, calculators had reportedly been replaced by personal computers to the point that calculator use diminished to less than 0.05% use by 2007. And here we are today, with the 30 ounce computer replacing the 30 ton ENIAC in less than 70 years. Let’s compare that to the invention of the light bulb. In 1801, British inventor Humphry Davy invented an incandescent light bulb, and later created the “arc lamp” in 1809. Though many similar inventions were created over the years, it was not until 1880 (79 years later) that Joseph Wilson Swan became the first man with a house lit by a lightbulb at the same time Edison was plagiarizing his own patents for profit of what should be free energy. 78 years… And yet in today’s high tech world we are seeing technology double every few months or years. Many theories have been attributed to this impossible race of technological breakthroughs, including the reverse engineering of alien technology and even aliens themselves doing the work. But what if the aliens were merely parasites? What if the question is not which man is inventing things today so rapidly in succession, but instead we should be asking how is such sudden knowledge possible? Is it ancient knowledge? Is it parasitic infection that is driving the intent of men to create nuclear bombs, biological weapons, Geoengineering designs, genomic subversion and mapping, and the host of other inventions that go so far against nature and the self-interest of mankind that no other explanation makes any logical sense? In one year, 200 trillion bases of DNA catalogued… which was more than all previous years put together. Does that seem reasonable to you? Does anything our leaders and organizations or corporations are doing today seem reasonable or logical to you? Have you ever talked to anyone who is capable of inventing such super-advanced technology, or just the people who put the parts together and operate the machinery? Do they really know how it works? Could they re-create the technology that machines are programed to produce and manufacture today, or are they just worker bees for the parasite hive-mind? And let’s not forget to mention the strange advent of transhumanism, i.e. the genetic alteration of humans to interface with machines or synthetic biologic technologies.
While other examples could be looked at, perhaps it is time to explain just where I could possibly have gotten this strange notion from.
Meet The Family: Toxoplasmosis Rules!
This is a fascinating look into cross-species protozoan parasitic infection, which literally makes a rat act against its best interest (its own life) by making it sexually attracted to it’s most deadly enemy. It gives rewards for stupid behavior. And this parasite purposefully infects the rat just to get itself into the cat’s stomach after it eats the rat.
When toxoplasmosis infects the human brain, it also seems to create feelings of sexual reward and pleasure through dopamine production for dangerous behavior. In other words, the human is rewarded for acting against his or her best interest.
What does the government say about this?
From the CDC website we read:
Toxoplasmosis is considered to be a leading cause of death attributed to foodborne illness in the United States. More than 60 million men, women, and children in the U.S. carry the Toxoplasma parasite, but very few have symptoms because the immune system usually keeps the parasite from causing illness.
However, women newly infected with Toxoplasma during pregnancy and anyone with a compromised immune system should be aware that toxoplasmosis can have severe consequences.
Toxoplasmosis is considered one of the Neglected Parasitic Infections, a group of five parasitic diseases that have been targeted by CDC for public health action.
Keep in mind that science of vaccines and the various frequency generators in our modern conveniences specifically weakens the immune system, as do many pharmaceutical drugs.
The International Scientific Times reports:
Scientists say that the Toxoplasma gondii parasite, or Toxo for short, living in 40 percent of our brains affects our sense of fear and risk-taking. Researchers found that rats, with which humans share a number of characteristics with, infected with the Toxo parasite were attracted to the smell of cat urine, instead of being afraid of it.
“Pathways that normally responded to the smell of cat urine with alarm had been damped down, while the pleasure hormone dopamine, normally released in response to female rodent urine, was now triggered by the whiff of cat,” The Telegraph reports. Scientists say it’s all part of the parasite’s way of spreading from host to host – rats that aren’t afraid of cats are more likely to be eaten by them, thereby spreading the parasite to the cat.
In human studies, the findings were similarly alarming. While men infected with the parasite were more likely to become introverted and dress down, infected women behaved just the opposite – dressing up and acting more sociable. The more likely a person is to interact with others, the better chances the parasite has of passing itself on.
Joanne Webster, professor of parasite epidemiology at Imperial College London, told The Telegraph that parasites prefer the brain because it is removed from the body’s immune system and also because it gives them “direct access” to the mechanisms of behavior.
We’ve known about the Toxo parasite since the 1920s, when scientists learned that the parasite was present in the feces of cats. During the AIDS epidemic, before antiretroviral drugs were effective and more widely available, the Toxo parasite was blamed for the dementia that many AIDS patients experienced towards the end of their lives.
The idea that parasites could control human behavior was first investigated in the early 1990s by an evolutionary biologist at Charles University in Prague named Jaroslav Flegr.
“There is strong psychological resistance to the possibility that human behavior can be influenced by some stupid parasite,” Flegr told the The Atlantic in March 2012.
He said he first learned of the ability of parasites to control their hosts 30 years ago after reading about how a certain flatworm can control ants by taking over their nervous systems. “It was the first I learned about this kind of manipulation, so it made a big impression on me,” Flegr said.
A human brain overrun with cysts from Taenia solium, a tapeworm that normally inhabits the muscles of pigs.
Gee… how could a pig parasite have gotten past the blood brain barrier unless it was injected?
“In terms of numbers, there are more parasitic infections
acquired in this country (United States) than in Africa.”
– Dr Frank Nova, NIH Parasitic Diseases Lab Chief
A recent issue of National Geographic came with the shocking cover story named “Real Zombies: The Strange Science of the Living Dead.”
Naturally, I was intrigued. And when I read the story, my worse fears were suddenly manifest, as it revealed some of the worst possible parasite infections in nature.
Perhaps the most shocking display of the designs that can be willed by the parasite to the host is this one:
“In Costa Rica, the orb-weaving spider Leucauge argyra will go to extravagant lengths to accommodate the needs of Hymenoepimecis argyraphaga, another freeloading wasp. The female glues its egg to the host’s body. After the larva emerges, it pokes a few holes in the spider’s abdomen and sucks its blood. When the larva has grown to full size, in a couple of weeks, the spider takes it upon itself to rip down its own web and build a new one of a radically different shape. Instead of a multistranded net designed for catching flying insects, the new web is merely a few thick cables converging at a central point. Having sucked its host dry, the larva spins its cocoon on a thread hanging from the intersection of the cables. Suspended in the air, the cocoon is nearly impossible for would-be predators to reach.”
Considering this dramatic takeover of the mind, where the spider is literally stripped of its natural instincts of survival in order to protect its unwelcome parasitic guest and thus mind-controlled to be made to demolish its own web, is it at all unreasonable to assume that this may be happening in the human population as well, which is observably and virtually doing just about the same thing?
Other documented cases include:
“A fly that infects bumblebees causes them to burrow into the ground in autumn, right before the fly emerges to form a pupa. In the ground the fly is protected not only from predators but also from the cold of winter.”
“Killifish, for example, normally stay away from the surface of the water to avoid being picked off by wading birds. But when they’re infected with flatworms known as flukes, they spend more time near the surface and sometimes roll so that their silvery bellies glint in the light. Infected killifish are far more likely to be picked off than healthy ones. And it just so happens that the gut of a bird is where the flukes need to go next to mature and reproduce.”
“Before infecting a human host, Plasmodium, the protozoan that causes malaria, spends the first stages of its life cycle in a mosquito. The mosquito needs to drink blood to survive. But this behavior poses a risk to the protozoan, because the mosquito may be crushed by the hand of an annoyed human victim, eliminating the opportunity forPlasmodium to move to the next stage of its life cycle, in the human. To reduce this risk while it is still developing in the mosquito, Plasmodium makes its host blood shy, seeking fewer victims each night and giving up faster if it can’t find a gusher of blood. Once Plasmodium has matured and is ready to enter a human host, it manipulates the mosquito’s behavior in the opposite direction. Now the mosquito grows thirsty and foolhardy, seeking out more humans each night and biting repeatedly even if it is already full. If the mosquito dies at the hand of a human, it is no longer of any consequence. Plasmodium has moved on.”
“Frederic Libersat of Ben-Gurion University and his colleagues, for example, are dissecting the sinister attacks of the jewel wasp, Ampulex compressa. The wasp stings a cockroach, transforming it into a passive zombie. The wasp can then walk its drugged victim into a burrow by the roach’s antenna, like a dog on a leash. The roach is perfectly capable of movement. It just lacks any motivation to move on its own behalf. The wasp lays an egg on the roach’s underside, and the roach simply stands there as the wasp larva emerges from the egg and digs into its abdomen. What is the secret hold that the wasp has over its victim? Libersat and his colleagues have found that the wasp delicately snakes its stinger into the roach’s brain, sensing its way to the regions that initiate movements. The wasp douses the neurons with a cocktail of neurotransmitters, which work like psychoactive drugs. Libersat’s experiments suggest that they tamp down the activity of neurons that normally respond to danger by prompting the cockroach to escape.”
“Baculoviruses, for example, infect the caterpillars of gypsy moths and a number of other species of moths and butterflies. The parasite invades its host’s cells, hijacking them to make new baculoviruses. On the outside the caterpillar appears normal, continuing to munch on leaves as before. But the food it eats is not becoming more caterpillar tissue. Instead it’s becoming more baculoviruses. When the virus is ready to leave its host, the caterpillars undergo a radical change. They become agitated, feeding without rest. And then they begin to climb. Instead of stopping in safe spots out of the way of predators, the infected caterpillars creep higher into the trees, remaining on top of leaves or on tree bark in daylight hours, when they are easily seen by predators. The baculoviruses carry genes for several enzymes. When they’re ready to leave their host, certain genes become active in caterpillar cells, producing a torrent of enzymes that dissolve the animal into goo. As the caterpillars dissolve, clumps of viruses shower down onto the leaves below, to be ingested by new caterpillar hosts. To Kelli Hoover and David Hughes of Penn State University and their colleagues, the climbing behavior of the caterpillars seemed like an exquisite example of an extended phenotype. By causing their hosts to move up in trees, the baculoviruses increased their chances of infecting a new host down below. To test Dawkins’s idea, they examined the genes in baculoviruses, to see if they could find one that controlled the climbing of caterpillars. When the researchers shut down a single gene in the virus, called egt, it continued to infect caterpillar cells and replicate as before, even turning the caterpillars to goo as before. But baculoviruses without a working copy of egt could not cause the caterpillars to climb trees. It’s unlikely that many other parasites control their hosts with a single gene; an animal’s behavior is typically influenced by a number of its own genes, each contributing a small part to the sum. So it’s probable that many parasites control their hosts with a multitude of their own genes.”
“And what of D. coccinellae and its hapless ladybug host? While at the University of Montreal, Fanny Maure and her colleagues made a startling discovery: In turning its victim into a willing bodyguard, the wasp itself may only be acting as the extended phenotype of yet another organism. The researchers found that when a wasp injects an egg into a ladybug victim, she also injects a cocktail of chemicals and other substances—including a virus that replicates in the wasp’s ovaries. Some evidence suggests it is this virus that immobilizes the ladybug, protecting the wasp’s cocoon from intruders. The virus and the wasp have the same evolutionary interests; turning a ladybug into a bodyguard produces more wasps, and more wasps beget more viruses. And so their genes work together to make the ladybug their puppet. The D. coccinellae wasp may not be the puppet master it once seemed. Instead it hides another puppet master within.”
Now you tell me that this wasps sting and payload as read above is not the exact description of the vaccination process!!! The wasp injects… a cocktail of chemicals and other substances…
And what could be a more sympathetic project for parasites that control their victims through gene expression than that of the Epigenome and Genome Projects?
Oh the joys of what can be created with genetic sequencing and vaccination of its result.
The author of this article also speculates that about 80% of ALL LIFE on Earth is in actuality parasitic in nature. 80%!
In our exploration of the horrors of parasitic brainwashing, let us not forget one of the most wonderfully bizarre and frightening parasitic manifestations of strange, anti-self-interest behavior…
Meet the Cordyceps
Perhaps the most intriguing aspect of the ant colony in its customary dealings with infected zombie ants due to the obvious manifestation of cordycep infection, is that the ants that are “in their right mind” forcibly quarantine the rest of the ant colony from the infected ant. And so you might want to ask yourself why we are not emulating nature in this regard? Why are we, that is we who are still collectively in our right minds, not at least quarantining ourselves and perhaps organizing to stop our own infected madmen from destroying our colony on Earth?
In 2010, National Geographic published an even more disturbing article and documentary movie on the notion of a real “zombie” infection in the human population:
“Zombie Virus” Possible via Rabies-Flu Hybrid?
Highly improbable genetic tweak could create mutant virus.
Though dead humans can’t come back to life, certain viruses can induce such aggressive, zombie-like behavior, scientists say in the new National Geographic Channel documentary The Truth Behind Zombies, premiering Saturday at 10 p.m. ET/PT. (National Geographic News is part of the National Geographic Society, which part-owns the National Geographic Channel.)
For instance, rabies—a viral disease that infects the central nervous system—can drive people to be violently mad, according to Samita Andreansky, a virologist at the University of Miami’s Miller School of Medicine in Florida who also appears in the documentary.
Combine rabies with the ability of a flu virus to spread quickly through the air, and you might have the makings of a zombie apocalypse.
Rabies Virus Mutation Possible?
Unlike movie zombies, which become reanimated almost immediately after infection, the first signs a human has rabies—such as anxiety, confusion, hallucinations, and paralysis—don’t typically appear for ten days to a year, as the virus incubates inside the body.
Once rabies sets in, though, it’s fatal within a week if left untreated.
If the genetic code of the rabies virus experienced enough changes, or mutations, its incubation time could be reduced dramatically, scientists say.
Many viruses have naturally high mutation rates and constantly change as a means of evading or bypassing the defenses of their hosts.
There are various ways viral mutations can occur, for example through copying mistakes during gene replication or damage from ultraviolet light.
“If a rabies virus can mutate fast enough, it could cause infection within an hour or a few hours. That’s entirely plausible,” Andreansky said.
Airborne Rabies Would Create “Rage Virus”
But for the rabies virus to trigger a zombie pandemic like in the movies, it would also have to be much more contagious.
Humans typically catch rabies after being bitten by an infected animal, usually a dog—and the infection usually stops there.
Thanks to pet vaccinations, people rarely contract rabies in the United States today, and even fewer people die from the disease. For example, in 2008 only two cases of human rabies infection were reported to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
A faster mode of transmission would be through the air, which is how the influenza virus spreads.
“All rabies has to do is go airborne, and you have the rage virus” like in 28 Days Later, Max Mogk, head of the Zombie Research Society, says in the documentary. The international nonprofit is devoted to “raising the level of zombie scholarship in the Arts and Sciences,” according to their website.
To be transmitted by air, rabies would have to “borrow” traits from another virus, such as influenza.
Different forms, or strains, of the same virus can swap pieces of genetic code through processes called reassortment or recombination, said Elankumaran Subbiah, a virologist at Virginia Tech who was not involved in the documentary.
But unrelated viruses simply do not hybridize in nature, Subbiah told National Geographic News.
Likewise, it’s scientifically unheard of for two radically different viruses such as rabies and influenza to borrow traits, he said.
“They’re too different. They cannot share genetic information. Viruses assemble only parts that belong to them, and they don’t mix and match from different families.”
Engineered Zombie Virus Possible?
It’s theoretically possible—though extremely difficult—to create a hybrid rabies-influenza virus using modern genetic-engineering techniques, the University of Miami’s Andreansky said.
“Sure, I could imagine a scenario where you mix rabies with a flu virus to get airborne transmission, a measles virus to get personality changes, the encephalitis virus to cook your brain with fever”—and thus increase aggression even further—”and throw in the ebola virus to cause you to bleed from your guts. Combine all these things, and you’ll [get] something like a zombie virus,” she said.
“But [nature] doesn’t allow all of these things to happen at the same time. … You’d most likely get a dead virus.”
Notice that the rule spoken over and over is that “nature” will not allow this type of recombinant mixing to happen. But let’s not forget that science isn’t interested in respecting the limits of nature, but instead seeks to conquer every aspect of it. Recombination happens in the lab, and new recombinations are patented as property of these madmen. Whether this is just human curiosity or parasitic will that is creating the insanity that is the institutional destruction of all that is sacred to man and nature unfortunately cannot be answered here. But the evidence provided here I dare say supports the very possible, even probable theory that this just might be the case.
The Thing Test
So what in the hell can we do about this if it is a reality? After all, we can’t see them if they are indeed controlling a portion of humanity.
The real question is whether an infected human would voluntarily be able to submit him or herself to any test conceived to find out! After all, such a test would be against the best interest of the parasite, and the expression of this will to stay hidden would probably be transferred to the personality of the host.
In John Carpenter’s “The Thing,” where the stranded victims could not tell who was the parasite and who was the human, they developed a test which burned the blood samples of each subject. When the parasitic blood was burned, the reaction gave evidence of infection.
So could such a test be used to detect those who are either infected or not infected?
Before I go all science fiction on you, I’d like to explore another avenue of control that may be explained by this parasitic infection of humanity. That is the notion of harmonic resonance and the spectrum of frequency.
One of the most tightly regulated areas in the world are the airwaves. The control and tuning of broadcast and other frequency is so governed and policed that the penalty for using the air without strict guidelines and permission from the state is harsh to say the least. I have often speculated, considering the history of Royal Rife, Tesla, and other researchers into the power of frequency to both heal and destroy life, including parasites, that the reasons for the “standards and practices” in broadcasting may very well be friendly to a parasitic infection, which would be in control of the regulators. With the advent of localized smart meters, cell phones, and other frequency radiation admiting and receiving devices that are provably dangerous to human health, I find myself ever more curious that we again knowingly act against our own best interest by ignoring the warnings and actual data.
It is a standard test, for instance, to use ultra-sound frequency in autopsy to literally activate and excite prions which in turn start mis-folding the healthy brain prions, infecting what is left of the healthy brain. This method is a specific frequency that benefits prions, and so the assumption is that there would also be an equal and opposite reaction with other specific ultra-sound ranges of frequency. Royal Rife certainly proved this to be the case with many organisms, speculating that all life had both health and death frequency ranges.
And so I musingly wonder if maybe, just maybe, it could very well be frequency that might be our Thing test.
Perhaps the foreshadowing of this in many science fiction movies may prevent us from realizing the reality of the fiction. After all, when Mars Attacks, no body really believes this can happen:
The alteration of the tuning of instruments is an interesting story, with the usual players. Rockafeller interests funded the United Nations in New York City, and thus within was spawned the International Standards Organization (ISO) based in London. From this organization was set the new global standard in musical tuning, from the harmonious and Biblical mathematical perfection of the healthy 432 hz to the now standard 440 hz, which is not harmonic with human health and vibration.
The very interesting history can be found here: https://atrueott.wordpress.com/2014/10/16/why-christians-and-worship-teams-should-tune-all-instruments-to-432-hz-and-abandon-440-hz/
So why the push to directly alter what was a standard tuning for generations?
Again, I can only state here that parasitic infection is a plausible answer to all of these questions.
After all this, one thing is certain. Mere conjecture as is posited here is not going to change anything. If indeed this theory is correct, we literally would have a war on our hands to save what remains of the natural order.
One final word about this theory… It’s not really mine.
While I am providing the evidence to support it, the truth is that this notion of mind parasites dates back for many centuries and from many different sources. The gnostics warned about these archons as demented mind parasites long ago. In my understanding, even the Bible warns not to cross species and races, perhaps even for this reason of creating unnatural chimeras. And yet here we are, cannibalizing our unborn like junkie freebasers, but for therapeutic reasons of course! Again I state that no one in their right mind would allow a doctor to inject human or animal proteins and DNA into their own body, especially aborted fetal tissue. But who among us is in their right minds? Logically, is it the vaccine user and abuser, or the “clean” vaccine opponent? The answer, it seems to me, lies microscopically within the very syringe in question.
The word archon is translated from Greek to mean ruler or lord, and sometimes master. The word is used to describe past kings, law-givers, and gods. But there is a more important translation I want to bring forward here…
–The American Heritage® Science Dictionary
This is the story of the extremophile, including virtually indestructible prions. Extremophiles hate oxygen. They hate just about any environment that is healthy for human and animal life. Be it volcanos, hot springs, methane pockets, or deep freezes, the extremophile thrives in the antithesis of what we enjoy. It is important to note that with all of our meddling, the oxygen levels of the Earth are also shrinking away, again creating a more parasite friendly environment for these extremophiles while, not ironically, causing more disease susceptibility and infect-ability in humans. Just another modern global event that can certainly be explained by parasites. But nothing to see here, right?
Form the Encyclopedia Britanica we read the entry for archaea:
Habitats of the archaea
Archaea are microorganisms that define the limits of life on Earth. They were originally discovered and described in extreme environments, such as hydrothermal vents and terrestrial hot springs. They were also found in a diverse range of highly saline, acidic, and anaerobic environments.
Although many of the cultured archaea are extremophiles, these organisms in their respective extreme habitats represent only a minority of the total diversity of the Archaea domain. The majority of archaea cannot be cultured within the laboratory setting, and their ubiquitous presence in global habitats has been realized through the use of culture-independent techniques. One commonly used culture-independent technique is the isolation and analysis of nucleic acids (i.e., DNA and RNA) directly from an environment, rather than the analysis of cultured samples isolated from the same environment. Culture-independent studies have shown that archaea are abundant and fulfill important ecological roles in cold and temperate ecosystems. Uncultivated organisms in the subdivision Crenarchaeota are postulated to be the most abundant ammonia-oxidizing organisms in soils and to account for a large proportion (roughly 20 percent) of the microorganisms present in the picoplankton in the world’s oceans. In the subdivision Euryarchaeota, uncultivated organisms in deep-sea marine sediments are responsible for the removal of methane, a potent greenhouse gas, via anaerobic oxidation of methane stored in these sediments. In contrast, uncultivated methanogenic (methane-producing) euryarchaea from terrestrial anaerobic environments, such as rice fields, are estimated to generate approximately 10–25 percent of global methane emissions.
The cultured representatives of the Crenarchaeota are from high-temperature environments, such as hot springs and submarine hydrothermal vents. Likewise, cultured members of the Euryarchaeota include organisms isolated from hot environments, organisms that are methanogenic, and organisms that grow vigorously in high-salt environments (halophiles). Organisms in the lineages Korarchaeota andNanoarchaeota also inhabit high-temperature environments; however, the nanoarchaea are highly unusual because they grow and divide on the surface of another archaea, Ignicoccus. Nanoarchaea, which were discovered in 2002, contain both the smallest known living cell (1/100th the size of Escherichia coli) and the smallest known genome (480 kilobases [1 kilobase = 1,000 base pairs of DNA]; for comparison, the human genome contains 3 million kilobases). Members of the Korarchaeota and Nanoarchaeota have not been detected in pure culture; rather, they have been detected only in mixed laboratory cultures.
Archaea are also found living in association with eukaryotes; for example, methanogenic archaea are present in the digestive systems of some animals, including humans. Some archaea also form symbiotic relationships with sponges; in fact, Cenarchaeum symbiosum was grown in the laboratory with its host sponge and was the first nonthermophilic Crenarchaeota to be cultured and described.
How many times have you heard the notion that a healthy human body must be in balance between acidic and alkaline Ph levels, and that disease flourishes in an acidic environment? Well so do archons (archaea). They like methane. They like extreme environments. They like stomach acid.
But more importantly they don’t like oxygen, they don’t like ozone, and thrive in anaerobic environments. Thus one curative measure might be to flood the body with the purest of oxygen, or to commit to oxygen therapy where the blood is oxygenated outside the body and reinserted. The trend and sophist popularity of anti-oxydents is suspect as well for these reasons. You can listen to my interviews with Mr. Oxygen (Ed McCabe) here:
Show #1 Ed McCabe (Mr. Oxygen):
Show #2 Ed McCabe (Mr. Oxygen):
Archaea are ancient forms of life compared to us. They are an RNA-based life form. It is RNA that controls the DNA switches of the epigenome. And the intelligence of this kingdom and domain of life is not measurable within the limited communication structure of man. We are indeed competitive life forms.
For a basic model of the communication and control that encoded RNA expresses over DNA, and how this archaea RNA life form might intercept that communication through transcription to control the host body, here is the technical jargon:
DNA transcription is a process that involves transcribing genetic information from DNA toRNA. The transcribed DNA message, or RNA transcript, is used to produce proteins. DNA is housed within the nucleus of our cells. It controls cellular activity by coding for the production of proteins. The information in DNA is not directly converted into proteins, but must first be copied into RNA. This ensures that the information contained within the DNA does not become tainted. DNA consists of four nucliotide bases [adenine (A), guanine (G), cytosine (C), and thymine (T) ] that are paired together (A-T and C-G) to give DNA its double helical shape. Nucleotide base sequences are the genetic code or instructions for protein synthesis.
Elongation – Certain proteins called transcription factors unwind the DNA strand and allow RNA polymerase to transcribe only a single strand of DNA into a single stranded RNA polymer called messenger RNA (mRNA). The strand that serves as the template is called the antisense strand. The strand that is not transcribed is called the sense strand. Like DNA, RNA is composed of nucleotide bases. RNA however, contains the nucleotides adenine, guanine, cytosine, and uracil (U). When RNA polymerase transcribes the DNA, guanine pairs with cytosine and adenine pairs with uracil.
Termination – RNA polymerase moves along the DNA until it reaches a terminator sequence. At that point, RNA polymerase releases the mRNA polymer and detaches from the DNA.
There are three main steps to the process of DNA transcription.
RNA Polymerase Binds to DNA – DNA is transcribed by an enzyme called RNA polymerase. Specific nucleotide sequences tell RNA polymerase where to begin and where to end. RNA polymerase attaches to the DNA at a specific area called the promoter region. Since proteins are constructed in the cytoplasm of the cell, mRNA must cross the nuclear membrane to reach the cytoplasm. Once in the cytoplasm, ribosomes and another RNA molecule called transfer RNA work together to translate mRNA into a protein. This process is called translation . Proteins can be manufactured in large quantities because a single DNA sequence can be transcribed by many RNA. Protein synthesis is accomplished through a process called translation. After DNA is transcribed into a messenger RNA (mRNA) molecule during transcription, the mRNA must be translated to produce a protein. In translation, mRNA along with transfer RNA (tRNA) and ribosomes work together to produce proteins.
Protein Synthesis: Transfer RNA – Transfer RNA plays a huge role in protein synthesis and translation. Its job is to translate the message within the nucleotide sequence of mRNA to a specific amino acid sequence. These sequences are joined together to form a protein. Transfer RNA is shaped like a clover leaf with three loops. It contains an amino acid attachment site on one end and a special section in the middle loop called the anticodon site. The anticodon recognizes a specific area on a mRNA called a codon.
Protein Synthesis: Messenger RNA Modifications – Translation occurs in the cytoplasm . After leaving the nucleus , mRNA must undergo several modifications before being translated. Sections of the mRNA that do not code for amino acids, called introns, are removed. A poly-A tail, consisting of several adenine bases, is added to one end of the mRNA, while a guanosine triphosphate cap is added to the other end. These modifications remove unneeded sections and protect the ends of the mRNA molecule. Once all modifications are complete, mRNA is ready for translation.
Protein Synthesis – Translation – Once mRNA has been modified and is ready for translation, it binds to a specific site on a ribosome . Ribosomes consist of two parts, a large subunit and a small subunit. They contain a binding site for mRNA and two binding sites for tRNA located in the large ribosomal subunit. During translation, a small ribosomal subunit attaches to a mRNA molecule. At the same time an initiator tRNA molecule recognizes and binds to a specific codon sequence on the same mRNA molecule. A large ribosomal subunit then joins the newly formed complex. The initiator tRNA resides in one binding site of the ribosome called the P site, leaving the second binding site, the A site, open. When a new tRNA molecule recognizes the next codon sequence on the mRNA, it attaches to the open A site. A peptide bond forms connecting the amino acid of the tRNA in the P site to the amino acid of the tRNA in the A binding site.
As the ribosome moves along the mRNA molecule, the tRNA in the P site is released and the tRNA in the A site is translocated to the P site. The A binding site becomes vacant again until another tRNA that recognizes the new mRNA codon takes the open position. This pattern continues as molecules of tRNA are released from the complex, new tRNA molecules attach, and the amino acid chain grows. The ribosome will translate the mRNA molecule until it reaches a termination codon on the mRNA. When this happens, the growing protein called a polypeptide chain is released from the tRNA molecule and the ribosome splits back into large and small subunits. The newly formed polypeptide chain undergoes several modifications before becoming a fully functioning protein. Proteins have a variety of functions . Some will be used in the membrane of the cell, while others will remain in the cytoplasm or be transported out of the cell. Many copies of a protein can be made from one mRNA molecule. This is because several ribosomes can translate the same mRNA molecule at the same time. These clusters of ribosomes that translate a single mRNA sequence are called polyribosomes or polysomes.
For the tech-savvy mind, we can read government sponsored research about signal transcription and communication between RNA archaea and human DNA here. It is very important to understand that this type of research is in mass and ongoing, and is very concerning when considering again our theory. Who or what is guiding these studies and for what purpose? And the real mind bending question becomes: Could man do this and other research and invention without a little help from his archaeon friends?
Determinants of transcription initiation by archaeal RNA polymerase.
Transcription in Archaea is catalyzed by an RNA polymerase that is most similar to eukaryotic RNA polymerases both in subunit composition and in transcription initiation factor requirements. Recent studies on archaeal transcription in diverse members of this domain have contributed new details concerning the functions of promoters and transcription factors in guiding initiation by RNA polymerase, and phylogenetic arguments have allowed modeling of archaeal transcription initiation complexes by comparison with recently described models of eukaryotic and bacterial transcription initiation complexes. Important new advances in reconstitution of archaeal transcription complexes from fully recombinant components is permitting testing of hypotheses derived from and informed by these structural models, and will help bring the study of archaeal transcription to the levels of understanding currently enjoyed by bacterial and eukaryotic RNA polymerase II transcription.
Transcription factor B contacts promoter DNA near the transcription start site of the archaeal transcription initiation complex.
Transcription initiation in all three domains of life requires the assembly of large multiprotein complexes at DNA promoters before RNA polymerase (RNAP)-catalyzed transcript synthesis. Core RNAP subunits show homology among the three domains of life, and recent structural information supports this homology. General transcription factors are required for productive transcription initiation complex formation. The archaeal general transcription factors TATA-element-binding protein (TBP), which mediates promoter recognition, and transcription factor B (TFB), which mediates recruitment of RNAP, show extensive homology to eukaryal TBP and TFIIB. Crystallographic information is becoming available for fragments of transcription initiation complexes (e.g. RNAP, TBP-TFB-DNA, TBP-TFIIB-DNA), but understanding the molecular topography of complete initiation complexes still requires biochemical and biophysical characterization of protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions. In published work, systematic site-specific protein-DNA photocrosslinking has been used to define positions of RNAP subunits and general transcription factors in bacterial and eukaryal initiation complexes. In this work, we have used systematic site-specific protein-DNA photocrosslinking to define positions of RNAP subunits and general transcription factors in an archaeal initiation complex. Employing a set of 41 derivatized DNA fragments, each having a phenyl azide photoactivable crosslinking agent incorporated at a single, defined site within positions -40 to +1 of the gdh promoter of the hyperthermophilic marine archaea, Pyrococcus furiosus (Pf), we have determined the locations of PfRNAP subunits PfTBP and PfTFB relative to promoter DNA. The resulting topographical information supports the striking homology with the eukaryal initiation complex and permits one major new conclusion, which is that PfTFB interacts with promoter DNA not only in the TATA-element region but also in the transcription-bubble region, near the transcription start site. Comparison with crystallographic information implicates the PfTFB N-terminal domain in the interaction with the transcription-bubble region. The results are discussed in relation to the known effects of substitutions in the TFB and TFIIB N-terminal domains on transcription initiation and transcription start-site selection.
In biology, the word homology as used in this study refers to the existence of shared ancestry between a pair of structures, or genes, in different species. In other words, RNA archaea can interact with DNA humans. We are compatible in a parasite-to-host kind of way. If that still isn’t clear, the archons can control us like puppets by utilizing transcription factors in the DNA transcription (communication) process of transfer RNA in protien syntheses.
This is a little bit like explaining the way a computer works in its communication by viewing the movie TRON. In the human body, this communication process of transcription that creates who we are and what our intentions will be manifested as is a bit like writing a book. The RNA must enconde the DNA and thus send various proteins throughout the body, be it for the immune response or cognitive response. These proteins are small enough to penetrate the brain.
So what is the difference between these cells, and why should we be concerned that archaeon RNA is most similar to eukaryotic RNA in regards to this transcription process?
Cells in our world come in two basic types, prokaryotic and eukaryotic. “Karyose” comes from a Greek word which means “kernel,” as in a kernel of grain. In biology, we use this word root to refer to the nucleus of a cell. “Pro” means “before,” and “eu” means “true,” or “good.” So “Prokaryotic” means “before a nucleus,” and “eukaryotic” means “possessing a true nucleus.” This is a big hint about one of the differences between these two cell types. Prokaryotic cells have no nuclei, while eukaryotic cells do have true nuclei.
Could the archaea be attributed with other qualities as well, such as king-maker? Does it explain the bloodlines and blood-types of the kings and popes being exclusively Rh-, and are the archons passed from one infected generation to to the next? Can publications like the Talmud and the Authorized King James Bible be the manifestation of this control factor? What about non-linear, 4rth generation, and other modern warfare methods, as expressed in such documents as Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars and the Iron Mountain Report? Can it explain the notion of the usurious corruption in banking, government, and religion, where vast designs of enslavement and control of the mind are institutionalized in ways that seem so incredibly convoluted and hidden that they would be impossible for man to invent? Does it explain the subversion of all that is good and nurturing in nature?
In conclusion, it seems we are in a tough position. I can only appeal to logic and reason here by providing the verifiable facts that make up the outline of this theory, and yet those traits have seemingly been hammered out of the majority of us through the very entertaining science fiction and fantasy genres that apparently reveal this reality over and over through a similitude of variations in story-telling. It’s a perfect way to hide things in plain sight if you think about it. Even the phrase conspiracy theory may be used here, though its user should be poked with a stick and examined for sanity and for brain parasites when considering that the conspiracy referred to would be responsible for the cognitive dissonance of that fallacious name-caller. I sometimes wonder if that blank stare and disconnect from reality that appears in peoples eyes when speaking to them about reality and possibility and the lines in the sky that form clouds is not some chemically induced archaeon response mechanism to keep its host in the dark about itself, like the toxoplasmosis pleasure response for stupid behavior. But I can only speculate…
And perhaps in the end that is the most frightening aspect of this whole theory. For, like the pod-people from The Body Snatchers, these seemingly psychopathic scientists, doctors, biologists, and Geoengineers would never be allowed by their parasitic infection to allow a “clean,” parasite-free person to challenge this theory in search of proof for it with funding or legitimacy for research. We would be spotted immediately; if not only for our uncontrolled, inquisitive minds in asking simply why?
If anything, this would make a fine script for a science fiction story. If only we could guess the way to a happy ending…
–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Wednesday, February 4rth, 2015