Another interview here. Please listen to my host Eric’s sourced citations as we travel through the construct, where he calls out just who’s really behind everything. I was honestly taken by surprise by his continuous, poignant references to the hidden hand behind it all. Amusingly, the comments on Youtube suggest I was avoiding the subject, as if I didn’t want to talk about the “Order.” If I’m not being censored I’m being falsely or fallaciously judged. I was even called a “new age gnostic mystic!” LOL! I’m not even sure what that is, but it let’s me know that most of us are so offended by the truth that if our rhetoric doesn’t fall into some category or already established belief system, that when an original thinker comes along we simply can’t handle it because we can’t classify it. And so it’s easier to dismiss the information by dismissing its speaker, ad hominem, by categorizing him (me) into a nonsensical thing like this. In my defense, though I don’t really feel like I need one, I was listening and learning to Eric like everyone else in the process. So I say, well done Eric. But my lack of response was honestly one of admitted ignorance to the facts stated, meaning I simply didn’t know these facts. I didn’t really understand how powerful this Order is because it’s not been my main area of study for the last 8 years, and so my comments are more generalized to what I do know. Shocking. That must mean I’m a Jesuit agent as well as a Gnostic mystic new age what-ever-the-fuck I could be. My lack of commentary is not a covering up or protectionism of the Jesuits, but rather my own ignorance on the subject. Sorry to disappoint. But now my suspicions on the subject are certainly confirmed. And I invite you to learn as well, for here we find not only the lies and liars but the source of them. And to Eric, I say WOW, great research, and thank you.

We had a few audio issues on the recording, an echo, etc. that were addressed by the end, getting a bit worse in the middle. Par for the course. It’s worth sitting through though, me thinks, as quality does get better…

(See below for my show notes):

Eric’s website: https://www.reddit.com/r/Jesuitworldorder/

–=–

Show Notes:

Some helpful definitions and Bible passages for this interview, regarding the only True Doctrine, the Doctrine taught by Christ.

From Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language:

JESUIT – noun – s as z. One of the society of Jesus, so called, founded by Ignatius Loyola; a society remarkable for their cunning in propagating their principles.

JESUITIC, JESUITICAL – adjective – Pertaining to the Jesuits or their principles and arts. 1. Designing; cunning; deceitful; prevaricating.

JESUITISM – noun – The arts, principles and practices of the Jesuits. 1. Cunning, deceit; hypocrisy; prevarication; deceptive practices to effect a purpose.

JESUITED – adjective – Conforming to the principles of the Jesuits.

–=–

–=–

JUDAIZE – verb intransitive – To conform to the religious doctrines and rites of the Jews. They–prevailed on the Galatians to judaize so far as to observe the rites of Moses in various instances.

JUDAIZER – noun – One who conforms to the religion of the Jews.

JUDAICALLY – adverb – After the Jewish manner.

JUDAISM – noun – 1. The religious doctrines and rites of the Jews, as enjoined in the laws of Moses. Judaism was a temporary dispensation. 2. Conformity to the Jewish rites and ceremonies.

DOCTRINE – noun – [Latin , to teach.] 1. In a general sense, whatever is taught. Hence, a principle or position in any science; whatever is laid down as true by an instructor or master. The doctrines of the gospel are the principles or truths taught by Christ and his apostles. The doctrines of Plato are the principles which he taught. Hence a doctrine may be true or false; it may be a mere tenet or opinion. 2. The act of teaching. He taught them many things by parables, and said to them in his doctrine. Mark 4:2. 3. Learning; knowledge. Whom shall he make to understand doctrine? Isaiah 28:9. 4. The truths of the gospel in general. That they may adorn the doctrine of God our Savior in all things. Titus 2:1. 5. Instruction and confirmation in the truths of the gospel. 2 Timothy 3:10.

–=–

Now we may really grasp here not only the concept of why we should be taking no other doctrine (truth/false truth) than that the scripture, but that we already have done so according to our status in society (personhood), our memberships to false corporate religions (artificial persons), and by our legalistic, secular, antichrist works. We cannot move forward, and we certainly cannot quit this legal matrix system, without first understanding how these false doctrines (truths) have been institutionally (corporately) forced upon us through our status (legal persona). The truth (God) will never be found in the legal systems and corporations (church and state) of man, for they are not of God’s realm, which is Truth, which is never built by the hands of men.

–=–

“…that thou mightest charge some that they teach no other doctrine (Law/Truth), Neither give heed to fables and endless genealogies, which minister questions, rather than godly edifying which is in faith: so do. Now the end of the commandment is charity out of a pure heart, and of a good conscience, and of faith (truth) unfeigned: From which some having swerved have turned aside unto vain jangling; Desiring to be teachers of the law; understanding neither what they say, nor whereof they affirm.”

—1 Timothy 1: 3-7, KJB

–=–

“But refuse profane and old wives’ fables, and exercise thyself rather unto godliness.”

—1Timothy 4:7, KJB

–=–

“For there are many unruly and vain talkers and deceivers, specially they of the circumcision: Whose mouths must be stopped, who subvert whole houses, teaching things which they ought not, for filthy lucre’s (gain, advantage) sake. One of themselves, even a prophet of their own, said, The Cretians are alway liars, evil beasts, slow bellies. This witness is true. Wherefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith; Not giving heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that turn from the truth. Unto the pure all things are pure: but unto them that are defiled and unbelieving is nothing pure; but even their mind and conscience is defiled. They profess that they know God; but in works they deny him, being abominable (idolotrous), and disobedient, and unto every good work reprobate.”

—Titus 1: 10-16, KJB

–=–

Strong’s #G2041 – ergon (ἔργον) – WORKS  – From a primary (but obsolete) ergo (to work), used in the scriptures 176 times as the following words: work (152x), deed (22x), doing (1x), labour (1x).

Outline of Biblical Usage:

1. Business, employment, that which any one is occupied.

A. That which one undertakes to do, enterprise, undertaking.

2. Any product whatever, any thing accomplished by hand, art, industry, or mind.

3. An act, deed, thing done: the idea of working is emphasized in opposition to that which is less than work.

–=–

What is your job, your employment. How are you being used by the legal matrix? What is your occupation inside the evil, and what is the product of your labour? What art (lie) holds your mind? How are your actions in any way in tribute or worship of God? The Law, the Doctrine is clear that all of your works must be put forth to God. In other words, all that you do should be toward and in support of Truth, of Nature and Its Law, toward the charity and good will of and to all men. This not only defines but proves a true son of God, a follower (not idol worshiper) of the doctrine (truth) of Christ.

Thank you Eric, for clearing up the source behind it all!

Here’s an interesting lecture on the subject as well:

“John McGreevy helps us to understand the remarkable rebirth and flourishing of the Jesuits as a global order in a very short time in the 19th century, showing how the Jesuits in the United States, many of them refugees from expulsions in Europe, nurtured a Catholic modernity that served as a disciplined counter-cultural force operating through parishes, schools, and associations… He places the Jesuits at the center of a worldwide clash between Catholics and Liberal Nationalists…”

–=–

Until next time…

.

–Clint < richard-son (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Friday, October 18th, 2019