Vatican: The New Global Authority Of Mammon


—=—

“Am I therefore become your enemy,
because I tell you the truth?”

—Galatians 4:16, KJB

—=—

“No one loves the messenger who brings bad news.” 

―Sophocles, Antigone

—=—

Just what is the Vatican to you?

A city? A corporation? A church? The adversary?

Whatever one’s opinion of this monstrous empire of all empires may be, one thing cannot be denied. It’s value in monetary consideration is virtually priceless, from its private vault collections to its billion plus tithing members pretending that money is a tribute of forgiveness for sin. But what can we possibly call this beast system that has no purchasable (conquerable) price upon its hydra-like head, a net worth without a net, and globally a partner with most (soon to be all) nations and religions?

What else can we call this universal incorporation but mammon incarnate?

Is this merely a passing metaphor, or can we begin to see evidence of such a adversarial nature?

Today I wish to share a few financial characteristics with my readers that, without a doubt in my own mind, shows that this Catholic (universal) church is nothing more than the protector of the faith, that faith being in the god of mammon. And just as the various denominations of global religions have apparently latched on to that papal teat, so too it appears has all denominations of currency have fallen under that global protectionism of the Holy See.

Perhaps unofficially it is and has always been this way?

Firstly, let us start with the source.

The Latin, Roman phrase Motu Propria carries the meaning of “on his own impulse,” and sometimes “of his own accord.” As a papally issued “law” it is a document issued by the Pope (or other sovereign “god”) which is considered to be only given on the personal initiative of that office of vicar, the acting christ-head of that corporation sole, which is the eternal (immortal) corporation passed on to each new man when appointed (anointed) to that office. This is not at all uncommon, as the Mormon “prophet” is also a corporation sole as “president” of that “corporation of the president.” The queen of England, bishops of several denominations, and other officers of government are also in the form of such immortal offices known as corporations sole. To be more accurate, any corporation is legally always an artificial person, and it must be said that the Bible is of course strictly against all forms of personhood and false, faltering titles. This is covered in triplicate in my upcoming volumes entitled Strawman: The Real Story Of Your Artificial Person. Please save this image and follow the link to the website where my book(s) will be downloadable for free soon.

Link–> https://psuploads.s3.amazonaws.com/customer/phoenix_job_complete/447947f0-de2c-11e4-9899-0242ac110002/1428524277/447947f0-de2c-11e4-9899-0242ac110002-1.jpg

The Pope’s issue of a motu proprio has a LEGAL effect. But worst of all, due to the pretended infallibility of the office, any lie, falsehood, or fraud may be a protected and legally upheld reason and justification without invalidation for such an infallible papal law. To be valid, it just needs the Pope’s will or initiative, while the purpose and effect are secondary to that impulse. It’s an unholy power of an idolotrous god.

This popular form of Papal rescript was first issued by Pope Innocent VIII in the year 1484. The first motto proprio created by Pope Innocent VIII in 1484, and is often used as an establishment or amendment of law. In considering this ridiculous notion of infallibility and according to the Catholic Encyclopedia, the canonists in their tradition referred to these motu proprio as “mother of repose,” for no corruption, fraud, or untruth is allowed to be sighted therein, the validity solely based on the word of the corporation sole (artificial person) that is the pope. It is he who makes “truth.” It is he who turns the darkness into a false light.

Link–> http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/10602a.htm

—=—
Though less formal than a constitution and absent the papal seal, the authority of this Motu Propria privilege may used to establish anything from instructional mandates, administrative statute, the creation of any commission (i.e. benefice), or to confer special favor, according to Encyclopedia Britannica.

Link–> http://www.britannica.com/topic/motu-proprio

—=—

Examples of past willful initiatives, as documented and linked from wikipedia, include:

—=—

One such recent document that was issued Motu Propria was this one, which is the main subject of this post:

—=—

APOSTOLIC LETTER
ISSUED MOTU PROPRIO 

OF THE SUPREME PONTIFF
FRANCIS

APPROVING THE NEW
STATUTES OF THE FINANCIAL INTELLIGENCE AUTHORITY

By means of the Motu Proprio “The Apostolic See” of 30 December 2010 on the prevention and countering of illegal activities in the area of monetary and financial dealings, my predecessor Benedict XVI established the Financial Intelligence Authority (FIAand approved its first statutes.

Subsequently, with a view to strengthening further the measures already taken to prevent and counter potential illicit activities in the monetary and financial sectors, as well as countering the financing of terrorism and the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, by means of the Motu Proprio “The promotion” of 8 August 2013I accorded new functions to the Financial Intelligence Authority.

Bearing in mind also the advice of the Commission for Reference on the Institute for the Works of Religionwhich I established by means of the Chirograph dated 24 June 2013I have deemed it appropriate to reform the internal structure of the Authority so that it may fulfill even more adequately its institutional functions and therefore, with this Apostolic LetterI approve the Statutes of the Financial Intelligence Authority hereby attached, which replace the previous ones.

I dispose that everything established in this Apostolic Letter issued Motu Proprio has full and permanent valuenotwithstanding anything to the contrary, although it may merit special mention, and I decree that it be promulgated by its publication in L’Osservatore Romano, entering into force on 21 November 2013.

Given in Rome, at Saint Peter’s, on 15 November of the year 2013, the first of the Pontificate.

Franciscus PP.

 ______________________

Statutes
of the Financial Intelligence Authority

 Chapter I

Nature and Functions

Article 1  Nature and legal seat

1. The Financial Intelligence Authority (FIA) is an institution connected to the Holy See in accordance with Articles 186 ff. of the Apostolic Constitution Pastor bonus.

2. The Authority is endowed with canonical PUBLIC LEGAL PERSONALITY and has its legal seat in the Vatican City State.

Article 2  Functions

The Authority shall perform, in full autonomy and independence, the following functions:

a) prudential supervision and regulation of those entities that carry out professionally a financial activity;

b) supervision and regulation for the prevention and countering of money laundering and financing of terrorism;

c) financial intelligence

Link–> http://w2.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/motu_proprio/documents/papa-francesco-motu-proprio_20131115_statuto-aif.html

—=—

Now, the typical faithful defender of this massive conglomerate “church” corporation will of course focus only on the apologetic notion that this legal intelligence agency is there to protect us and the legal “church-state” from those idiotic keywords of “money laundering” and “terrorism.” And indeed, these two terms are repeated over and over by this apologist pope in his forced declaration motu proprio. The god has spoken. It’s corporate will be done. But we forget that to protect money is to respect money, thus to protect mammon is to respect mammon. Notice that this will of the pope is not one that protects say children, but banks. It does not protect man or any aspect of God’s Nature, only the institutions of mammon.

Sometimes I feel like I’m the only one out here that can or is willing to cut through the Bull-shit of these false prophets and self-proclaimed vicars (replacements) of christ, revealing only that oh so hurtful Truth that offends so many worshipers of the lie. As I have revealed in my research, this term “legal” is another term for that which is antichrist, anti-God, or anti-Nature (Creation). These opposing forms of law that we still utilize today, the strict legal or civil law and the “unwritten” moral or spiritual Law of course have their origins in Rome. The Vatican even labels its own moral authority of its elected officer the pope as a “spiritual jurisdiction.”

But let us make no mistake, the Vatican bank and Bank of Rome are alive and well. They practice usury on a grand scale. And do not mistake the Bank of England for anything but the Bank of Rome! This chain of mammon was opened in Venice in 1587, the Wisselbank in Amsterdam in 1609, in Hamburg in 1619, Nuremberg in 1621, Rotterdam in 1635 and last but not least the Bank of England in 1694, being the first bank to actually be named after the country it is housed in. After the “Bank” of Rome it was officially to become the world’s first Central Bank.

In other words, these Romish banks were the ultimate weapon of usury in mammon around the world, destroying the welfare and prosperity of all nations it touched. But then something strange happened during the reign of King Edward VI (1547-1553).

“(Act relating to Usury.) Another bill was brought in against usury, which passed both houses, and was made a statute. By it, an act passed in the 37th of the late king (Henry VIII), that none might take above 20 per cent on money lent, was repealed; which they said was not intended for the allowing of Usury, but for preventing farther inconveniences. And since Usury was by the word of God forbiddenand set out in diverse places of Scripture as a most odious and detestable vicewhich yet many continue to practice, for the filthy gain they make by it; therefore, from the 1st of May, all usury or gain from money lent was to ceaseand whosoever continued to practise to the contrarywas to forfeit both principal and interestto suffer imprisonmentand to be fined at the king’s pleasure.”

–Cobbett’s Parliamentary History of England, vol. I, p.596

—=—

Needless to say, his was a short reign, and his edict of anti-usury was of course repealed shortly thereafter in 1571.

Imagine a world without usury for a moment, without the need for new money. There would be no need for a central bank at all! Banking would become an unprofitable business, and bankers would be reduced to mere cashiers. And what possible power could the nations and the Vatican have without usury in mammon against the very scriptures it claims as its reason for being?

Eventually, with usury fully re-instituted by those Romish, Popish powers that be, the Bank of England was incorporated on July 27, 1694 as a private joint-stock association, founded by William Patterson (1658-1719). And the era of monopolistic corporate banking supported by the conspiring “church and state” and by making loans of money that could never apparently be repaid, including that whole starting capital of £1.2 million of the Bank of England being loaned to the English government, it was granted the exclusive right to issue notes and hold monopolistic oversight over the entirety of English corporate banking houses, with full support of the Parliament of course, which could end that central bank at any time but which also knows what happens to any entity or nation that defies the usurious Pope. Tied to that loaned principal was of course interest, compounded in a way that what lies in circulation is never enough to douse the flames of such usurious practices. More notes would always need to be issued as more and more compounded debt as usury was accumulated. And in this way, making all men and all nations as perpetual debtors, the debt itself became a performance debt, where the debt-slaves perform according to the will of their master lender. Of course the money is only a tool to cause performance, a win-win situation for the bankers, who would be paid in the money of its own creation or in the much more valuable collateral backing that loan. In order to preserve the collateral, the debtor must of course perform for the creditor.

England naturally expanded into the Americas via its corporations and through colonization, where the tables had turned, as the colonists this time attempted to oust the Romish central bankers of England in order to kill their outlaw usury.

The Parliament’s Stamp Act (called as the: Duties in American Colonies Act 1765under George III) was used as a tool by these central bankers to quash any attempts by those colonists to outlaw their usurious practices. It was a simple plan; bond with usury a burden upon the American colonists with a tax that could only be paid in English specie (minted coins), of which were solely a proprietary production of the Bank of England. To pay the tax, the colonies would need to borrow their coinage from the central bank of their tyrannical, usurious master. Of course, compounded usury was attached to that borrowed coin, and through that compounded interest the common class of colonists were thrust into the very similar economic conditions we suffer today at the hands of these same international collective of central banks, which are today all reforming under the purview and best practices and statute (cannon) laws of the United Nations and the World Bank. This devious lending practice has continued unabated as nations and countries borrow from America or other usurious institutions and are forced to pay those loans of interest back with collateral, with such things as water and mineral rights which are handed over to the exploitive corporations controlled by the same governing Roman Law as its regulatory hand.

—=—

“That is simple. In the Colonies, we issue our own paper money. It is called ‘Colonial Scrip.’ We issue it in proper proportion to make the goods and pass easily from the producers to the consumers. In this manner, creating ourselves our own paper money, we control its purchasing power and we have no interest to pay to no one.”

Benjamin Franklin on Colonial Scrip

—=—

“The Colonies would gladly have borne the little tax on tea and other matters had it not been the poverty caused by the bad influence of the English bankers on the Parliamentwhich has caused in the Colonies hatred of England and the Revolutionary War.”

Benjamin Franklin on Colonial Scrip

—=—

“9th. That the duties imposed by several late acts of Parliament, from the peculiar circumstances of these colonies, will be extremely burthensome and grievousandfrom the scarcity of specie (coins), the payment of them absolutely impracticable.”

The Declaration of Rights of the Stamp Act Congress

—=—

Franklin was also quoted in his opinion that the so-called revolution was caused by nothing more than the Bank of England and its usurious practices; practices of which are the common and standard business practices for the central bank of the United States and other nations today, only worse. For the Bank is the King and the King is the Bank. The revolution though can only be called as a deceit, creating only a newer, more organized, and more powerful monster than before, controlled by the same bloodlines that pretended to twice defeat it. War is of course the most single greatest and most profitable act of commerce imaginable, and also the greatest creator of debt, as nations clamor to acquire loans to fund their theaters of war. The central bank of the United States was created just two year after the signing of its constitution (corporate charter). For what is never discussed in the patriot mythology of today is the very definition of this word constitution. Let’s break it down into its component parts:

CONSTITUTION – contracts – The constitution of a contractis the making of the contract asthe written constitution of a debt. (–Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856, as commissioned and made law by congress, as “Adapted to the constitution and laws of the United States of America and of the several States of the American Union.”)

CON – …1. To know. 2. To make oneself master of; to fix in the mind or commit to memory… (–Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1828)

STICK – noun – [G. This word is connected with the verb to stick with stockstack, and other words having the like elements. The primary sense of the root is to thrust, to shoot, and to set.]… – verb transitive preterit tense and participle passive – stuck. [G., to sting or prick, to stick to adhere.] 1. To pierce; to stab; to cause to enteras a pointed instrument; hence, to kill by piercing; as, to stick a beast in slaughter. [A common use of the word.] 2. To thrust in; to fasten or cause to remain by piercing; as, to stick a pin on the sleeve… – verb intransitive – …2. To be unitedto be inseparable; to cling fast toas something reproachful… 4. To stopto be impeded by adhesion or obstruction; as, the carriage sticks in the mire. 5. To stop; to be arrested in a course…11. To adhere closely in friendship and affection. There is a friend that sticketh closer than a brother. Proverbs 18:24. To stick toto adhere closelyto be constantto be firm; to be persevering; as, to stick to a party or cause… To stick by, 1. To adhere closelyto be constantto be firm in supporting. We are your only friends; stick by us, and we will stick by you. 2. To be troublesome by adhering… (–Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1828)

TUTELAR, TUTELARY – adjective – [Latin tutelarissupra.] Having the guardianship or charge of protecting a person or a thingguardianprotecting; as tutelary genii; tutelary goddesses. (–Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1828)

TUTELAGE – noun – [from Latin tutelaprotection, from tueorto defend.] 1. Guardianshipprotectionapplied to the person protectingasthe king’s right of seignory and tutelage. 2. State of being under a guardian(–Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1828)

TUTOR – noun – [Latin from tueroto defend.] 1. In the civil lawa guardianone who has the charge of a child or pupil and his estate. 2. One who has the care of instructing another in various branches or in any branch of human learning… – verb transitive – To teachto instruct. 1. To treat with authority or severity. 2. To correct(–Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1828)

—=—

Whatever the reader may contemplate, in the legal realm Truth is much stranger than the fiction we are led to believe in by our chosen entertainment and the public tutelage by the legal public education system that is forced upon us by the state (nation) to create public-mindedness (idiocy).

Perhaps the most clever weapon created by these banks and their organizers and regulators (governments) was the creation of what we call modernly as the “personal loan.” Sold as commercial “product” made of thin air, this loan type is packaged in many ways and with many colors, from secured real estate loans to unsecured credit card debt charged with ridiculously high rates of usury. Whereas before the banks loaned only to governments, associations and corporations, and to men of high class and standing in their false nobility of blood, today any idiot can get a loan, and the most popular of these loans is the credit card.

But why was this such a brilliant move by the government’s banks in their pursuit of the usurious domination of all men?

To give every person a stake, a personal part of our own individual destruction in mammon, which is to say that every man has a choice to indenture himself to these moneychangers voluntarily and without force of government sanctions in taxation. These devils no longer need to steal our souls, for we contract and prostitute ourselves freely to that love of money in mammon via their constituted contracts. For it must be said that to love money is to believe in money and to believe in it is to respect its value. These terms are al equal in the legal setting, respect, belief, and love.

LIEVE – for liefis vulgar. [See Lief.] (–Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1828)

LIEF – adjective – [See Love.Dearbeloved. [Obsolete.] – adverb [supraThis word coincides with love, Latin lubetlibet, and the primary sense is to be freepromptready.] Gladlywillinglyfreely; used in familiar speech, in the phrase, I had as lief go as not. It has been supposed that had in this phrase is a corruption of would. At any rate it is anomalous. (–Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1828)

SUPRA – A Latin preposition, signifying above, over or beyond(–Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1828)

LOVE – verb transitive – luv. [Latin libeolubeo. See Lief. The sense is probably to be promptfree, willing, from leaningadvancing, or drawing forward.] 1. In a general sense to be pleased withto regard with affection, on account of some qualities which excite pleasing sensations or desire of gratification The christian loves (believes in) his Bible. In short, we love whatever gives us pleasure and delightwhether animal or intellectual; and if our hearts are rightwe love God above all things, as the sum of all excellence and all the attributes which can communicate happiness to intelligent beings… It is opposed to hatred. (–Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1828) (Emphasis mine)

Thus the Biblical meaning of the love of money being as the root of all evil is not a Natural Love, but actually the hatred of debt, the false belief (love) that such unfunded debt actually exists and is binding, and thus the respect for it and the authority of its artificial creators. It is this love (belief) of money that has destroyed each and every one of us, whether we care to admit it or not. The rich or wealthy man is too far gone to admit his lucre is tainted, valuing his wealth and money over knowledge, setting aside such knowledge as the true evil, for his wealth depends upon the harm of all others who have nothing. And it is our national citizenship, a performance debt place upon each rented persona (legal status), that requires such love and respect of mammon in the central bank of the nation. It causes us to compete with each other over the false dialectic (logic) that money is scarce, though unlimited amounts can easily be created with the press of a keyboard computer system entry.

My favorite verse in the Bible, one that Truly caused me to reconsider my own love (belief) in money, is this one:

—=—

“Let no man seek his own, but every man another’s wealth.”

–1 Corinthians 10:24, KJB

—=—

As I considered the consequences of such a suggestion, I realized this is the very opposite of this ancient system of Rome. We suffer at its hands and of its central banks and systems of internationally collaborative money and usury. This above all other verses changed my whole way of thinking. For it is the very revealing of a cure for all of this misery and suffering at the hands of tyrants and Pharisees in high places. This is the very definition of the Purest form of Charity, not some empty non-profit (non-prophet) donation to some false corporation calling itself by the empty name of a legal “501 charity,” but of a spiritual state of mind in all men that is the cure for all that causes dis-ease. It is the opposite of legalism, the opposite of mammon, the opposite of competition, and the opposite of modern corporate “religion.”

It is a vicious circle, for when both the government and the religions registered as “legal” corporations of and under government’s legal law are in league and support of mammon, of the justification of enslavement of all common men by usury, then no religion actually exists in Reality. Today’s churches are as fake and un-christ-like as any fiat currency out there. They support the legal fiction of the state and command against the scriptures to obey the “law of the land,” which in legal terms means only the “due process of law,” which in that fiction of law only means the “legal” opinion of the American and International Bar Associations (IBA).

As we will come to see, the Vatican is happily a partner with the IBA.

—=—

“The value of a thing is estimated according to its worth in money,
but the value of money is not estimated by reference to a thing.”

Res per pecuniam sestimatur, et non pecunia perrem. Maxim of Law.

—=—

“It’s impossible to have religious freedom in any nation where churches are licensed to the government.”

—Congressman George Hansen, quoted from “In Caesar’s Grip,” by Peter Kershaw

—=—

“Masonry, like all the Religionsall the Mysteries, Hermeticism, and Alchemy, conceals its secrets from all except the Adepts and Sagesor the Electand uses false explanations and misinterpretations of its symbols to mislead those who deserve only to be misledto conceal the Truthwhich it calls Lightfrom themand to draw them away from itTruth is not for those who are unworthy or unable to receive itor would pervert it. So God Himself incapacitates many men, by color-blindness, to distinguish colors, and leads the masses away from the highest Truth, giving them the power to attain only so much of it as it is profitable to them to know. Every age has had a religion suited to its capacity.

The Teacherseven of Christianityarein generalthe most ignorant of the true meaning of that which they teachThere is no book of which so little is known as the Bible. To most who read it, it is as incomprehensible as the Sohar.

So Masonry jealously conceals its secretsand intentionally leads conceited interpreters astray…”

—Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma, Pages 104-105

—=—

“The George Washington University was founded in 1821 as the Columbian College in the District of Columbia using funds set aside by George Washington to create “an institution in the nation’s capital dedicated to educating and preparing future leaders.” Today, there are over 20,000 students from every state and 130 countriesLocated just four blocks from the White House, it is fitting that the 2009 Princeton Review ranks GWU as second in the nation for “Most Politically Active Students…”

Aside from being named after America’s most famous Freemason, it’s notable that Freemasonry and the Scottish Rite have deep historical connections to the George Washington University. For example, Rice Hall which houses the University’s administrative offices, including the president’s office, is named for Luther Rice, a Mason and Baptist Minister who originally conceived the idea for the University. Three of the last five of the University’s presidents have been Masons, including President Emeritus and Colonial Lodge member Stephen Joel Trachtenberg, 33°, G.C. A gift of $1 million by the Scottish Rite in the 1928 created the University’s School of Governmentand there have been Masonic cornerstone laying ceremonies for at least five University buildings, including in 2003 for the Elliott School of International AffairsMasonry is also responsible for the Wolcott Foundationcreated by the High Twelve Internationalfor undergraduate and graduate scholarships to the University.”

—‘The University Lodge: A History and Case Study,’ excerpted from the Supreme Council of 33rd Degree Scottish Rite Masonry, Southern Jurisdiction, United States website, (scottishrite.org)

—=—

It’s always fun and horribly enlightening to put these pieces of the puzzle together. And it is not surprising that the secrets of the Bible are so well kept, even despite the fact that a Bible sits upon the shelves of every home and library and false church out there. For the best kept secrets are those hidden in plain sight. To hide the intent of any language, one only need create a language barrier. And so the Bible is hated and loved not because it is comprehended, but because it is compared to the church, though it is very much against such temples built by hands in masonry. We are taught that the church is a building instead of a spiritually driven, building-less People.

But what of this love (belief) of money? How does this love and respect of the nothingness that these gods (magistrates) of mammon represent as world fiat currencies destroy us all so easily? And what causes us to continue to respect and believe in (love) the fallacy that debt actually exists in Reality, as if it is an undeniable Creation of God?

The money has no value except that which we attach it to in our imaginations, in our love for it. The money is created by the govern-ment (mind control) of the idolatrous nations. All “Christian” religions are incorporated artificial persons licensed to practice legally (not spiritually) under (not over) the government, and so all “Christians” are encouraged to support, love (believe in), respect, and have faith in government, including its monopoly and “trust” on money creation. No one seems to ask what god is invoked when we pass these bills to and fro, as that incantation of “IN GOD WE TRUST” is never questioned. One thing is clear, this “god” certainly cannot be the God of Nature, the God of Reality, the God of “Creation.” Any fool can surely comprehend that much. But of course those in government and those who founded (constituted) it are, if not Masons, friendly to its universal (catholic) cause. And that cause is the protection of Rome, of the Caesar’s we call as those districted nations united under one governing religion of mammon.

CATHOLIC – adjective – 1. Universal or generalas the catholic church. Originally this epithet was given to the Christian church in general, but is now appropriated to the Romish churchand in strictness there is no catholic churchor universal Christian communion. The epithet is sometimes set in opposition to heretic, sectary or schismatic. 2. Liberal; not narrow minded, partial or bigoted; as a catholic man. 3. Liberalas catholic principles. Catholic epistles, the epistles of the apostles which are addressed to all the faithfuland not to a particular church– noun – A papist(–Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1828)

—=—

Of course the Catholic mind must be liberal. How else can one possibly accept the doctrines of the Catholic church and its corporate officer the Pope unless one ignores the scriptures? How else can “Christians” accept such blatantly false doctrines without having a liberal mind? And how else can all the nations of the world be formed unless the scriptures as the self0evident Law of Nature be purposefully ignored? This word liberal is yet another misunderstood term, and is a necessary state of mind for public-mindedness, so that multiculturalism and acceptance of all other forms of religious law, even that which is opposed to their very name-sake of christianity, are tolerated and integrated into society to the point that no religious way can possibly be found by the average plebe.

In the mythos of this nation as well, the “founding fathers” were certainly said to be known as “liberals,” and are most famous in their deism for ensuring the separation of the Highest moral Law of scripture from their own business ventures and slave-holding plantations in the enterprises of commerce and usury in mammon. For what man may hold slaves and charge usury if he follows the moral Law?

—=—

Of fifty-six signers of the Declaration of Independencefifty-three were Master Masons… George Washington the founder of this country was the first Grand Master of Masons of this commonwealth compromising the thirteen original States of this Land of Liberty founded on the principles of Brotherly LoveFaithHope and Charity, the vital breath of which is “Individual Liberty” and an equal opportunity to all of its citizens. Of the twenty-nine Major Generals in Washington’s army twenty four were Master Masons, of the thirty seven Brigadiers, thirty seven were Master Masonsproving that this “Land of Liberty” was founded by Master MasonsNow as thenmasonry’s challenge is the Holy Bibleits teachings from the center to circumference symbols of the everlasting. “The Washington Monument is built of stone contributed by all the nations of the earth to honor the founder of this republic. From Arlington it looks like a giant spike which God had driven, saying ‘Here I stake a claim for the home of Liberty’.”

Holy Bible Red Letter Edition – Masonic Edition Cyclopedic Indexed King James Bible, published by the John A. Hertzel Co. Chicago (1942).

—=—

The first central bank of the United States was of course chartered shortly after the Masonic constitution of the United States was, in 1791, for a central bank is after all a necessary plank of what is modernly called as the Communist Manifesto, of which all ten planks are now law in the United States. Though its charter expired after 20 years, and the bank abolished, it was re-chartered just 5 years later, in 1816. Again its 20 year charter was ended and not renewed in 1836. Not to be outdone, the Banksters of the Crown corporation reestablished the central bank as the “Federal Reserve” we know it today. But in taking a cue from previous failures, the charter of the Federal Reserves was recreated into infinity, creating the central bank that can never die unless congress wills it. As it stands, there is no contractual end of the charter for the federal reserve.

In answer to the many fallacious claims by so many alternative news outlets that simply do not fact-check what they parrot, the Federal Reserve found it necessary to create a section reserved just for the idiocracy that is the so-called “truth” movement, which in this author’s opinion is a controlled opposition designed to deceive the seekers of actual Truth, just as Masonry decrees in its doctrines. In short, those who take the name of “truth” and wear it as a false badge of courage but only seek its origin from second and third-hand sources as those in the “truth” movement do, as Albert Pike stated above, deserve neither Truth nor the Natural liberty under God’s Law it reveals.

On its website the Federal Reserve puts to rest any notion of its own legal mortality:, one of many patriot mythologies stemming from false “truthers” that it laughably corrects:

“Is the Federal Reserve Act going to expire?

No. The Federal Reserve Act of 1913which established the Federal Reserve as the central bank of the United Statesoriginally chartered the Federal Reserve Banks for 20 yearsBut in the McFadden Act of 1927the Congress rechartered the Federal Reserve Banks INTO PERPETUITY, and so there is currently noexpiration dateor repeal date for the Federal Reserve.

Link–> http://www.federalreserve.gov/faqs/is-the-federal-reserve-act-going-to-expire.htm

—=—

Such power does this “truth” movement have as its misinformation causes waves in that holy sea (See) of commerce that it causes such federal agencies to correct the idiocy promulgated by those false prophets. The agency is also forced to dispel all of the other “truths” told about its ownership, its supposed privacy, its apparent non-federal status, and its ability to make a profit.

“Who owns the Federal Reserve?

The Federal Reserve System fulfills its public mission as an independent entity within governmentIt is not “owned” by anyone and is not a privateprofit-making institution.

As the nation’s central bankthe Federal Reserve derives its authority FROM THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATESIt is considered an independent central bank because its monetary policy decisions do not have to be approved by the President or anyone else in the executive or legislative branches of governmentit does not receive funding appropriated by the Congress, and the terms of the members of the Board of Governors span multiple presidential and congressional terms.

Howeverthe Federal Reserve IS SUBJECT TO OVERSIGHT BY THE CONGRESS, which often reviews the Federal Reserve’s activities and can alter its responsibilities BY STATUTE. Therefore, the Federal Reserve can be more accurately described as “independent WITHIN the government” rather than “independent of government.”

The 12 regional Federal Reserve Banks, which were established by the Congress as the operating arms of the nation’s central banking systemare organized SIMILARLY to private corporations–possibly leading to some confusion about “ownership.” For example, the Reserve Banks issue shares of stock to member banks.

Howeverowning Reserve Bank stock is QUITE DIFFERENT from owning stock in a private companyThe Reserve Banks are not operated for profitand ownership of a certain amount of stock isby lawA CONDITION OF MEMBERSHIP in the SystemThe stock MAY NOT BE SOLD, TRADEDOR PLEDGED as security for a loandividends areby lawpaid to member banks at a maximum rate of 6 percentdetermined in part by each member bank’s total assets.

Link–> http://www.federalreserve.gov/faqs/about_14986.htm

—=—

Through painstaking research and airtime I have tried desperately to wake the mass of misled “truthers” up from their own delusions, from their own internal and external “infowar,” seemingly to no avail. The lies continue, parroted as “truths.” And this grandest of all patriot mythologies, in this author’s humble opinion, is one perpetrated by the very entities that wish to create a decoy. Obviously the Central Bank cannot exist without the full support and statute of congress and the belief (love) and respect of all involved. And we must remember that even hatred of anything is still a form of belief and respect of that thing’s existence. They say that hate and love are synonymous, and perhaps now we may understand why that is. And so the real enemy has floated complete bullshit to the main outlets of false “truth”, imagining a strawman enemy and argument of its own creation, so that the public will actually think that the Federal Reserve is not bound by the hand that created and regulates it, that being the congress of the United States. Thus this word independence is used without condition by “truthers” who know not the legal meaning of that word. And just like their own franchise of “freedom” that they believe is True and Natural liberty instead of a state of servitude and voluntary slavery to the nation they are the goyim (multitude) of, so too have we been made to believe that the Federal Reserve is somehow Naturally independent and somehow separate (meaning private) from government. And soundbites from official sources further fool us into such beliefs (love) of these false “truths.” Even as ridiculous as this concept is, that congress (the legal gods) created some entity that they then cannot control and have no power to abolish, the creation being somehow more powerful than its creator, and despite every actual official and legitimate published source available, the lie still persists despite the actuality of the nature of this United States central bank. And most importantly to this great and powerful delusion, the congress pretends to be the helpless victim of its own creation, claiming their hands are tied and even passing laws that allow the chairman of the Fed to withhold information in any public forum or congressional inquiry, further leading the “truthers” to believe that the Fed is “private” and not bound by its creator congress. They never realize that when the chairman of the Fed sits so arrogantly across from that public inquiry of its creator congress (god), that the reason he in his official capacity and by law refuses to answer any questions is because the law prevents public disclosure of those facts addressed. In other words, the congress is asking questions of the Fed chairman that it knows its officer will not be able to answer under charges of perjury!!! And this is in turn used in media sound bites to prove the private authority of the Federal Reserve. It’s a very clever game. It is called govern-ment (mind control) for a reason, for even the most ardent seeker of the Truth is blinded by its power. And inversely, the universal church stands only to subvert men from discovering the very Real Truth presented in the Bible, a Truth that would utterly destroy all denominations (proper names) of “Christianity,” a false and flattering title of no substance created by the Roman Caesar. The word Christian was certainly not a creation of christ or of God, and christ never directed anyone to become a legal “Christian.” Quite the opposite. Again, this is covered in triplicate in my upcoming volumes of research.

My in depth research long ago uncovered this idiocy about the many false rumors surrounding the Federal Reserve system, and the actual, primarily sourced reality about this agency of government can be found here:

Link–> https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2012/06/23/the-incontrovertible-conundrum-of-dr-ron-paul/

Link–> https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2012/09/01/todays-creatures-from-jekyll-island/

Link–> https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2014/10/27/stop-the-religion-of-the-fed/

—=—

Here are some prime examples of very bad research that leads so many astray and cause so much arrogance of ignorance. And yet I am somehow the enemy for routing out these vipers of disinformation that tell lies worse than any banker or agency of government by simply pointing to the actual, primary sources of information. The Truth, and only the Truth, will set you free. Applying the flattering, empty title of “truth” to anything or anyone does not necessarily, and very seldom in fact, make it so…

—=—

“Government Preparing for the End of the Federal Reserve Charter in 2013”

“The Federal Reserve Charter began on December 23, 1913. This charter was good for 100 years, ensuring the Federal Reserve’s control over the United States currency…”

Susanne Posel, excerpt from: http://occupycorporatism.com/government-preparing-for-the-end-of-the-federal-reserve-charter-in-2013/

—=—

I can’t count how many times I’ve shown this particular disinformation agent to be false, though I am unaware as to her status of useful idiot or handled asset. Whatever the case, these conspiratorial liars cause most people to miss the actual conspiracy (which is government itself) and focus on these false realities. What is the actual source of this lie remains unclear, but Suzzane Posel’s post seems to be the most often parroted among “thruthers” and their unverified, un-vetted sources.

And then there’s this type of random “truth” rumor reporting. This guy has no clue, seeking no legitimate source except by other “truthers.” How embarrassing it must be to create and support a petition to “end the 100 year charter” of the Fed when the simplest of research will reveal that the original 20 year charter was abolished by congress and changed into an unconditional perpetuity that only congress can end. And was there an apology? A correction? Anything?

—=—

From the parroting of these myths comes other logical fallacies based on the truth of the original lies, generally in the form of pointless speculation on a fictitious event and date that in reality doesn’t exist. Like December 21, 2012 as the supposed end of the world as we know it, the proclaimed end-day of the Fed came and went without a whimper, while congress laughed at all this idiocracy over a beer with Ben Bernanke and “Sir” Alan Greenspan.

—=—

And of course we cannot forget the progenitor and loud speaker of this total spoof, G. Edward Griffen, who plagiarized much of his work from Eustace Mullins without credit. Note that he says he doesn’t want to talk about what is “unpopular” in this interview, as so many “authors” of “truths” wish not to disturb the putrid pools of pond scum they have recreated. Of course not, because the “truth” movement loves and subsists on its own created lies.

—=—

While this soft and well-spoken man, who relies on the grandfatherly appearance of his trustworthiness to overshadow his untrustworthy words, just as Alex Jones relies on quite the opposite approach to quash any notion he is full of his own shit, spouts his mythology in such professional fashion, a special thanks to the website “Exposing Faux Capitalism” for breaking down the bullshit that is professed here. For the best lies are those parroted amongst actual Truths. The best salesman always uses Reality to peddle his own brand of fictions.

“Some interesting points arose out of this November 24, 2013 interview on the Big Plantation with G. Edward Griffin:

16m – In clearing up misconception about a 100-year charter for the Federal Reservehe says there originally was oneand it was later removedwhen in reality it was a 20-year charter.

19m – No JFK speech at Columbia university about breaking up Fed, as he had never even been to that university.

28m – Admits govt can shut down gold and silver, too. (In other words, its speculative value in dollars is subject only to government’s valuation.)

28m – Said it’s a good idea to have your assets tied up in gold and silver (FC: It wasn’t a good idea in 1933 and 1934, when they were confiscated, respectively!). (Funny to consider gold and silver, which is called as “lawful money,” is somehow protected from confiscation. They can take anything they want, your home, your children, your pets, and your God damned gold. No really, gold is looked down upon in the Bible folks. Seek knowledge, not gold and jewels.)

34m – Laughably says it doesn’t mean they want to back a currency with it, because it puts limits on their ability to make more money off interest. (What about the U.S. backing up its money supply from 1914 to 1933 40% by gold? Were the people crying out for that, or was it the bankers? He’s either unaware of, or intentionally concealing the historical pattern of the bankers reverting to some gold standard in order to shore up confidence in the monetary system after they’ve collapsed the current one.) (Exactly… wash, rinse, and repeat. I like this guy.)”

Link–> https://fauxcapitalist.com/2013/12/25/g-edward-griffin-on-the-alleged-100-year-federal-reserve-charter-and-his-claim-that-bankers-dont-want-a-monetary-system-based-upon-gold/ (Emphasis mine)

—=—

Well, at least the real creature Griffen got one thing right! The former charter, though 20 years not 100 years, was indeed reworked into perpetuity by congress. But he still proclaims the Federal Reserve is somehow not “federal.” Does that mean congress is not “federal” either? Unfortunately these very well-placed mistakes, either conscious or not, drive the “truth” movement into the very bowels of the darkness of ignorance.

Kudos at least to Bill Still, author of the Money Masters, though still a trumpeter and repurposer of many false quotes and mythologies parroted by others before him over and over in that “movement” and in the “truth” in documentary form, for at least coming forward to correct this “truth” that he was before unaware of and thus for verifying a rumor to be false when asked his opinion about it by the great shit factory of media entertainment corporations that is the Alex Jones’ “Infowars” machine.

—=—

—=—

Let’s take a look at the repercussions of such irresponsible reporting, as it manifests in a trickle-down effect amongst so many sincere seekers of what is really happening in the world. That is, until it reaches my eyes and ears!

From the GodLikeProductions.com forum, one member speculates that the “Federal Reserve’s 100 Year Charter Ends the SAME DAY as the Mayan Calendar ENDS.” Another post seems to challenge other members and perhaps the “truth” movement altogether with the headline “Why No Mention That The Federal Reserve’s 100 Year Charter Expires Soon,” as if some faction or element of the “truth” movement is trying to hide that fact. So funny…

TheTruthNews.com carries the headline: “Charter of the Federal Reserve Act expires in 2013,” reposting and parroting the poo flung by the original sourced monkey Suzanne Posel.

The SaviorsOfTheEarth website and forum posted this: “The U.S. Federal Reserve’s 100 Year Charter Expires ON The Now Infamous Date of December 21, 2012! …The U.S. Federal Reserve’s 100 year charter expires on the now infamous date of December 21, 2012. Its all over the net

Therefore it must be the “truth!”

Even the ALIPAC website got in on the action, again flinging Posel’s shit, when it posted: “Big Brother America: Government Preparing for the End of the Federal Reserve Charter.”

RealistNews.net’s forum included this post: “So Did The FEDERAL RESERVE give themsleves another 100 year contract? …The 99 year contract Congress gave the Federal Reserve back in 1913 has run out… why does that not matter to the public?” It then referred to another source from RumerMillNews.com, a source that has been deleted from that site, here: (http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/arc…ead=151858)

—=—

Fortunately, as word got around that this was a hoax, the “truthers” started correcting themselves in their own forums, often sounding almost disappointed that the lie wasn’t real, complete with the facts that these facts were only presented on “conspiracy” fact websites. Sadly, these things give a very bad reputation to the actual legal word conspiracy, which are thus used against all of the real cries of these sheep that unwittingly follow wolves dressed up like them. But of course there is no conspiracy from government. There cannot be. For the very definition of the word conspiracy in law is CONFEDERATION!!! Amazingly, we never wake up to the fact that we are all part of the conspiracy of government, pledging our fealty and love to it, and accepting therefore all it does against us and others.

CONFEDERACY – Criminal law. An agreement between two or more persons to do an unlawful actor an actwhich though not unlawful in itselfbecomes so by the confederacyThe technical term usually employed to signify this offenseis CONSPIRACY(Bouv1856)

CONSPIRATORS – Persons guilty of a conspiracyThose who bind themselves BY OATHcovenantor other alliance that each of them shall aid the other falsely and maliciously to indict personsor falsely to move and maintain pleas, etc. Besides these, there are conspirators in treasonable purposesas for plotting against the government. (Black4)

CON – Preposition – With. A prefix meaning withtogether. Webster. – Adjective – A slang or cant abbreviation for confidenceas a con man or a con game(Black4)

CONSPIRACY – In criminal law. combination or CONFEDERACY between two or more persons formed for the purpose of committingby their joint effortssome unlawful or criminal actor some act which is innocent in itselfbut becomes unlawful when done by the concerted action of the conspiratorsor for the purpose of using criminal or unlawful means to the commission of an act not in itself unlawfulA combination, or an agreement between two or more personsfor accomplishing an unlawful end or a lawful end by unlawful meansA partnership in criminal purposes. The essence of “conspiracy” is an agreementtogether with an overt actto do an unlawful actor do a lawful act in an unlawful manner. Mere knowledge, acquiescence, approval, or attempt on part of one to perpetuate illegal act is insufficientA conspiracy may be a continuing one; actors may drop out, and others drop inthe details of operation may change from time to timethe members need not know each other or the part played by othersa member need not know all the details of the plan or the operationshe musthoweverknow the purpose of the conspiracy and agree to become a party to a plan to effectuate that purpose. A consultation or agreement between two or more persons. either falsely to accuse another of a crime punishable by law; or wrongfully to injure or prejudice a third person, or any body of men, in any manner; or to commit any offense punishable by law; or to do any act with intent to prevent (BAR) the course of justice; or to effect a legal purpose with a corrupt intent, or by improper means. (Black4) (EMPHASIS MINE)

—=—

Silly rabbits, government cannot conspire against itself. Its very creation was the original sin, the origin and encompassment of the entirety of a conspiracy, a confederated plan and covenant by oath to create a legal corporation (district) that would falsely impersonate and cause fictional, legal attainder (corruption of blood) to all who become voluntarily its legal persons (public citizen-ships) under oath to protect it even from ourselves (domestics).

In short, the government cannot commit conspiracy against itself or its public persons, which is to say that it cannot commit evils against any of its own public creations (citizenships).

EVIL – It is an “evil” within rule that either means or end of conspiracy must be evilto frustrate or impede a government function, whether that function is performed under a constitutional or an unconstitutional law(Black4)

UNCONSTITUTIONAL – That which is contrary to the constitutionThe opposite of “constitutional.” The word DOES NOT necessarily mean that the act assailed is contrary to sound principles of legislation. (Black4)

—=—

What is evil to that which is evil is only that which is good. To evil, to a conspirator (confederate) in binding combination under a sacred oath with others, the only evil (conspiracy) is that which is opposed to the original evil (confederation/conspiracy/combination).

Perspective is everything…

And this is why the alternative media model, the “truth” and “patriot” movements, are miserable failures. Never are any of the “truths” or actual sourced research presented therein ever taken to court. It would be pointless endeavor, since all of the crimes of congress are legally licensed by their own statutes. Their own constitution even proclaims them to be immune from punishment while in their fictional seats of office and while on company (United States) business. No story is ever followed through. It’s just a vomitous spew of information, a convincing mix of lies with realities. And it’s worthless. It means nothing without the courts opinion of it. There is no conspiracy because the conspirators sit in judgement over their own conspiracy. It’s a closed loop system. Nothing Alex Jones and other information vomiters has ever gone past the microphones and the $19.99 DVD’s and books they prostitute. It’s just info, and the real war is to ensure disclosure without any effect or punishment. The war on our minds is to cause in us a collective stillness, so that as long as the so-called  “truth” is being told, surely something will be done about it. But nothing ever happens.

This is the stagnant cesspool of these information pushers, a false dialectic that directs the mind into believing that merely speaking about and “exposing” the crimes is somehow akin to a public lynching. But the lynch-pin stays safely secured. The hangman retired long ago. And the only actual event taking place, the only real Truth, is that the bank accounts and egos of these disinformation agents are getting a whole lot fatter.

To be clear, what this commercial congress creates has nothing to do with the constitution. They wear two hats, de jure (of law) and de facto (illegitimate). Their public laws and statutes with regards to commerce are a separate aspect of government, a side business that has nothing to do with the constitution. Legislation by congress in commercial matters (in mammon) need not be at all constitutional, and its evils “within rule” cannot be questioned or challenged, lest the challenger be in conspiracy against government. We must understand that most of the functionality of congress is indeed unconstitutional, prima facie, and deals only with those of us in public citizenship to its district. Citizenships of the United States, as creations of the District of Columbia, are not protected in any way by the constitution. A federal (non-State) citizenship is purely commercial in its nature, having nothing to do with the negative constitutional protections that private citizens (landholders of the private/several States) enjoy.

If you can understand the following definitions, then you can understand why a United States citizen-ship stands only without unalienable rights in a commercial franchise of usury, of usufruct, of voluntary servitude, and is not a party to the constitution, which protects only the negative, reserved rights of private (not public) State citizens. The international law of nations under admiralty/maritime law is not the same as the private law of the several (private) States (the People).

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA – A territory situated on the Potomac river, and being the seat of government of the United States. It was originally ten miles square, and was composed of portions of Maryland and Virginia ceded by those states to the United States; but in 1846 the tract coming from Virginia was retroceded. Legally it is neither a state nor a territorybut is made subjectby the constitutionto the exclusive jurisdiction of congress. (Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th edition)

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA – IS NEITHER A STATE NOR A TERRITORY. Congress is authorized to exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as mayby Cession of particular Statesand the Acceptance of Congressbecome the Seat of the Government of the United States.” Maryland and Virginia ceded territory on the Potomac, which Congress, by act of July 16, 1790, accepted. In December, 1800, the seat of government was removed from Philadelphia. By the act of July 11,1846, Congress retroceded the county of Alexandria to Virginia. The District constitutes the county of WashingtonA CITIZEN OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IS NOT A CITIZEN OF A STATEThe laws in force December 1, 1873, were revised and republished, by direction of Congress, in a separate volume known as the Revised Statutes relating to the District of Columbia. (W.C. Anderson’s Dictionary of Law, 1889)

—=—

For further clarification, let us view the history of this district as told in Federal case of DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, a Municipal Corporation, Petitioner, v. OCEAN RISK RETENTION GROUP, INC:

Sections 1 and 18 of the act of congress of February 21, 1871, entitled ‘An act to provide a government for the District of Columbia‘ (16 St. 419), are as follows: ‘Section 1. That all that part of the territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia be, and the same is herebycreated into a government by the name of the District of Columbiaby which name it is hereby constituted a body corporate for municipal purposesand may contract and be contracted withsue and be suedplead and be impleadedhave a sealand exercise all other powers of a municipal corporation not inconsistent with the constitution and laws of the United States and the provisions of this act.’ ‘Sec. 18. That the legislative power of the District shall [129 U.S. 141, 144] extend to all rightful subjects of legislation within said Districtconsistent with the constitution of the United States and the provisions of this actsubjectneverthelessto all the restrictions and limitations imposed upon states by the tenth section of the first article of the constitution of the United States… These sections are carried forward into the act of congress of June 22, 1874, entitled ‘An act to revise and consolidate the statutes of the United Statesgeneral and permanent in their naturerelating to the District of Columbia, in force on the first day of December, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and seventy-three,’ as sections 2, 49, 50…

And Whereas: The Constitution does provide that Congress has the power to exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever over such district not exceeding ten miles square, as may, by session of particular states and the acceptance of Congress, BECOME THE SEAT OF GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES.

And Whereas: On February 21, 1871, the Forty First Congress passed an act entitled “An Act to Provide a Government for the District of Columbia,” legislating the organization of a municipal corporation to run the day to day affairs of the District of Columbiathe seat of governmentwhich transferred the United States of America, the Republic, INTO “A CORPORATE ENTITY” entitled UNITED STATESin capital lettershaving “no” jurisdiction outside the District of Columbia.

And Whereas: Congress adopted the text of the federal constitution as the constitution or charter of this municipal corporationThis municipal corporation was granted the power TO CONTRACT to provide municipal services to the inhabitants of the District of Columbia and necessarily as an operation of the privileges and immunity clause of Article Four of the Constitutionany other person who chooses to contract for its services.

—=—

A difficult pill to swallow, we must realize that citizenship to the United States is a contractual relationship. But more to the point, we must take into consideration the maxims (principles) of law, which state that the contract makes the law. The laws of the federal government of the United States are public laws which do not effect or bind the private “People” of each State. But a contracted, public United States citizen-ship is a creation of the United States, and the maxim (principle) of law states that the creator controls. A man that stands privately (non-commercially) has no citizen-ship (vessel) of the United States, respecting that union only as a compact in conspiracy (confederation) that stands to protect his reserved rights of privacy. But a man acting in the agency of a public person (legal status) created by the United States under contract is the opposite of the private man acting as a State citizen, and retains nothing of his God-given or unalienable rights thereof, opting instead to a contractual state in subjection and voluntary servitude (under the doctrine of master and servant) to that district. A United States person only exists in the extended jurisdiction of the District of Columbia, also known as “the United States,”

—=—

“…This position is assented to by Chief Justice MARSHALL, speaking for this court, in the case of Hepburn v. Ellzey, 2 Cranch, 445, 452, where the question was whether a citizen of the District could sue in the circuit courts of the United States as a citizen of a stateThe court did not deny that the District of Columbia is a state in the sense of being A DISTINCT POLITICAL COMMUNITYbut held that the word ‘state‘ in the constitutionwhere it extends the judicial power to CASES BETWEEN CITIZENS OF THE SEVERAL “STATES, REFERS TO THE STATES OF THE UNION

“…it was held that parties residing in one county could not be said to be beyond the seas,’ or in a different jurisdiction, in reference to the other countythough the two counties were subject to different lawsWe are clearly of opinion that the plaintiff (as the DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA) IS A MUNiCIPAL CORPORATIONhaving a right to sue and be suedand subject to the ordinary rules that govern the law of procedure between private persons.

Corporations are ‘PERSONS IN THE LAW. There is no apparent reason why they should not be included in the statuteIt is conceded that private corporations are included

It cannot apply to the sovereign powerof course. No restrictive laws apply to the sovereign unless so expressed. And especially no laws affecting a right on the ground of neglect or laches, because neglect and laches cannot be imputed to himAnd it matters not whether the sovereign be an individual monarchor a republic or stateThe principle applies to all sovereigns. The reason usually assigned for this prerogative is that the sovereign is not answerable for the delinquencies of his agents. But, whatever the true reason may be, such is the general law,—such the universal law, except where it is expressly waivedThe privilegehoweveris a prerogative oneand cannot be challenged by any PERSON INFERIOR to the sovereignwhether that person be natural or corporate

The doctrine is well understoodthat to the sovereign power the maxim ‘nullum tempus occurrit regi‘ applies, and that the United States and the several states are notwithout express wordsbound by statutes of limitationAlthough municipal corporations are considered as public agencies, exercisingin behalf of the statepublic duties, there are many cases which hold that such corporations are not exempt from the operation of limitation statutesbut that such statutesat least as respects all real and personal actionsrun in favor of and against these corporations in the same manner and to the same extent as against natural persons.’ In Evans v. Erie Co., 66 Pa. St. 222, 228, SHARSWOOD, J., says: ‘That the statute of limitations runs against a county or other municipal corporationwe thinkcannot be doubtedThe prerogative is that of the sovereign alonenullum tempus occurrit reipublicaeHer granteesTHOUGH ARTIFICIAL BODIES CREATED BY HERare in the same category with natural persons‘…

—METROPOLITAN R. CO. v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Decided: October 21, 1889 – 132 U.S. 1 (10 S.Ct. 19, 33 L. Ed. 231) Nathaniel Wilson and Walter D. Davidge, for plaintiff in error. A. G. Riddle and H. E. Davis, for defendant in error. BRADLEY, J.

—=—

To have public (federal) citizenship in the United States, which is seated in the municipal corporation of Washington D.C., is to no be a citizen privately of any State. We have all been duped by the birth certification process, which is the creation of a legal United States entity (legal person), to contract in that person as agents of the principality of the United States. We confirm and ratify our public person-hood with every signature, every benefit taken, every number assigned, and every expression of use of that commercial vessel (ship) until finally, at the age of consent or “adulthood,” we enter into legalized (licensed) adultery in that commercial jurisdiction of mammon. We are thus rendered unto Caesar (the district).

No legally created entity (admixed corporate name) of the commercial government of the United States has unalienable rights, for national citizenship is the opposite of being a private State citizen, being as one who reserves all non-franchised, natural law rights under God. The very notion of public or national citizenship is very much a lean on all such “God-given” rights, which are replaced by a commercial franchise under contractual relationship called as “freedom” within the jurisdiction of the United States. All the goyim born in the nations united around the world are under the contract of this synagogue of satan, causing us to act adversarial to our very nature and best interests, and placing us into a hopeless state of land-less commercial being in abandonment of our God. It matters not what your religion is, you have a god (magistrate). Your god is either Natural or unnatural, legal fictions or Reality. The choice to contract in the person (status) of another, of a municipal corporation subservient to congress, is the choice to accept the artificial state and its magistrates and administrative judges as your god, the creator of the legal status (person) you play the part of. The ship (person) of the United States citizen is under the control of these legal gods, while the Bible, as being part of the common law, is abandoned under said contract of U.S. citizenship. The common law does not apply to U.S. citizens, meaning that the state is free (separate) from the church, and more specifically that no moral, spiritual, or natural law of any kind applies to the contracted relationship. The U.S. citizenship, standing in total abandonment of all God-given rights, is purely a legal commercial entity.

For those who dismiss the Bible because they have dismissed the True Nature of what religion actually is, an act of sheer ignorance, let us examine this choice between being private and contracting in public. To act in religion against the legal law of man and to accept a false, flattering title of some corporation calling itself legally as a “religion” are two completely different things. Flattering titles do not make the man. And “Christian” is an empty word, as are all of its denominations (names) stemming from the “Catholic” universal legal church and state. And so, if the reader wishes to discover why he or she is a slave to this system of deceit and piracy, why his patriotic “truths” never seem to jive with the realities experienced under this legal police state, you better loose your ego and fully comprehend the following, and realize that the corporate, legal church and state, no matter what it calls itself, can only be antichrist in its artificial nature.

CHRISTIAN – One who believes or assents to the doctrines of Christianity, as taught by Jesus Christ in the New Testament, or whobeing BORN of Christian parents or IN A CHRISTIAN COUNTRY, does not profess any other religion, or does not belong to any one of the other religious divisions of manSee NAME(W.C. Anderson’s Dictionary of Law, 1889)

CHRISTIANITY – The religion established by Jesus Christ. 2. Christianity has been judicially declared to be a part of the common law of Pennsylvania… To write or speak contemptuously and maliciously against itis an indictable offense(Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856)

CHRISTIANITY – The system of doctrines and precepts taught by Christ; the religion founded by Christ. Christianity is said to be part of the common law. Christianity is parcel of the laws of England; and, therefore, to reproach the Christian religion is to speak in subversion of the law.” “The essential principles of natural religion” and “of revealed religion, are a part of the common lawso that any person reviling or subverting or ridiculing them may be prosecuted at common law.” “The true sense of the maxim is that the law will not permit the essential principles of revealed religion to be ridiculed and reviled.” Christianity is a part of the common law of Pennsylvania in the qualified sense that its divine origin and truth are admitted, and therefore it is not to be maliciously and openly reviled and blasphemed against, to the annoyance of believers or the injury of the publicNot Christianity founded upon any particular religious tenets; but Christianity with liberty of conscience to all men. The maxim does not mean that Christianity is an established religionnor that its preceptsby force of their own authorityform part of our system of municipal lawnor that the courts may base their judgments upon the Biblenor that religious duties may be penally enforcednor that legal discrimination in favor of Christianity is allowed. The best features of the common law, especially those which regard the family and social relations, if not derived from, have at least been improved and strengthened bythe prevailing religion and the teachings of its sacred Book. But the law does not attempt to enforce the precepts of Christianity on the ground of their sacred character or divine origin. Some of those precepts, though we may admit their continual and universal obligation, we must nevertheless recognize as being incapable of enforcement by human laws. Those precepts, moreover, affect the heart, and address themselves to the conscience; while the laws of the state can regard the outward conduct onlyFOR WHICH REASONS CHRISTIANITY IS NOT PART OF THE LAW OF THE LAND IN ANY SENSE WHICH ENTITLES THE COURTS TO TAKE NOTICE OF AND BASE THEIR JUDGEMENTS UPON ITexcept so far they can find that its precepts and principles have been incorporated in and made a component part of the law of the StateThe maxim can have NO REFERENCE TO THE LAW OF THE NATIONAL GOVERNMENT, since the sources of that law are the CONSTITUTIONTREATIESAND ACTS OF CONGRESS. (W.C. Anderson’s Dictionary of Law, 1889)

—=—

The key to understanding here is the difference between who established the religion. The religion of christ is the Bible, as the law of God, christ being the example of how man is to act in accordance with that Highest spiritual Law of God and no other, despite all other temptations, and also known by such modern names as the Natural Law and equitableness (but not as “equality”). The Catholic religion was started by Caesar, a flattering legal title forced upon all his pagan citizenry, carried on by the immortal office of “Pope,” and guarded legally and violently throughout history by the vatican city-state. Thus our legal person of the state falls under the law of the establisher of the church, just as the constitution was militarily “established” and religiously “ordained” as one entity. Separation is not divorce, just a really bad relationship. The church and state, as we have just read and by whatever name we denominate it under, are both opposed to the Natural Law of God, and always stand in combination to enslave by deception. All persons, all corporations, are unnatural. There are no exceptions.

To remain as a private man, one must follow this unwritten law as part of the common law, which is to say the the common law may only be invoked by those who have not sold their soul in to the public, commercial citizen-ship of mammon. This is not to say that the common law is at all a good thing, only that the choice must be made to follow the scriptural law so that the common law recognizes our intent above whatever civil fiction and artificial rights of its legal franchise. As for the rest of the common law, which amounts mostly to the Roman law and to court decisions, presidents, and opinions of the Bar Associations both national and international, we must realize that the common law allows each man his own individual choice to either act religiously (spiritually and morally in privacy under God’s Law) or legally (artificially and in evil under the fictional persona of the state in public show). It’s all about choice. And in this completely corrupted society of nations united in evil under the one world government and “universal” religion, it has become custom to automatically accept this form of voluntary, indentured slavery from birth. The entirety of society, from education to entertainment, is an evil (conspiratorial) design to injure (bring into legal jurisdiction and law) all men. Choice has been turned into a causality, the acceptance of citizenship to the United States merely a causal effect of public education and thus public-mindedness passed on from generation to generation, until the once public knowledge has been turned into the jealously guarded secrets of the secretaries of the state. The greatest secret of the corporate church and state is their purposeful inducement of complete ignorance of both the scriptural and legal systems of law, to the point where today the only way we can identify with the Truth of Reality is to call ourselves by another flattering title with no substance, as “truthers” and “patriots.” But the real Truth is that we cannot take back our country because it was never ours to begin with. We are not its creators and so cannot be its sovereigns. The hardest Truth is that we can only take back our Self, our spiritual identities, by relinquishing our contractual relationship with the district that distrains and distresses us in seizure (Caesar). For the only country that we can ever take back is God’s Country. For to be a citizenship of the United States or of any other legal entity, nation, or State, is to take another god before the One True God of Nature, as is written in scripture (and thus unwritten in the common law). The creator controls. The Highest God wins. And the surname as a legal attachment defeats the authority of the christian name, for in the legal law all is backwards, unnatural, and so the last name is considered as the first name, as the last will and testament of the man acting in agency to a principal legal god of some nation.

—=—

“For all the gods of the nations are idols…”

—Psalms 96:5, KJB

—=—

To be more clear, and as is detailed beyond doubt in my forthcoming works, of which this blog post is merely a minute microcosm of that detailed, multi-volumed digest and encyclopedic reference guide of True knowledge and of self-evidence, a public citizenship is a foreigner in whatever private (several) State he resides in. The word several as legally defined and used in United States law means private or foreign. Thus the United States is a foreign “state” as compared to the several States (private, landholding People). The domicile and artificial existence of any United States person (a legal, public status) is only within the jurisdiction of the United States, and its residence is as a public easement or license to commercially partake in public things and trade. It cannot tread on the private lands of the private People of each private (several) State. For the United States citizen-ship (commercial vessel), all trade is thus interstate commerce, for a United States citizenship only ever exists in a temporary residence within any private State, its “home” and father (family) being only the federal District it is birthed and registered into. And as my works reveal, the climax of this stranger-than-fiction story is simply this: no United States citizen-ship may hold land in perfect or “alodial” title, which means that we are a fictional “people” that are always trespassing on the privately held land of one of the private People (as the privately constituted We, the People), having no land (castle/kingdom/sovereignty) of our own, existing only to serve those private masters through that municipal corporation in public, commercial, interstate franchise. The conspirators created the United States to protect their own private land holdings against us, against their goyim, and have slowly caused mass ignorance amongst the general (goyim) population so that they may, with each new “generation,” cheat (escheat) us all out of our rightful blood inheritance over the lands of our ancestors. Public citizenship under the United States is not the same as being a private State citizen over (as creator/god of) the United States. Public law effects only public persons, and the de facto congress in its commercial hat only creates public law.

This is the legal matrix we have slowly been deceived and tricked into accepting as our false reality, under a false id-entity, and the alternative “truth” and “patriot” movements are there to perpetuate the mythos that all citizens, public and private, national and State, are “equal.” Nothing could be farther from the Truth. For in true Orwellian style, only slaves can be made to be equal. Equality is not equitableness under the Natural Law of God. Equality is a forced “right” required to be respected by each citizen-ship. Equity is the law of persons, not men. The scriptural, moral law is that man must be equitable in his relations with all other men, never acknowledging his persons or flattering titles of that legal realm. This is True wisdom, the hidden mysteries never taught by the church and state, for the Bible is very much opposed to all things legally established, be they fictionally “commercial” or “religious” institutions. And so we may understand why the church is said to be false. The whore of Babylon to which so may prostitute themselves to. There is such a massive difference between “legal” equality (the voluntary slavery of public citizenship) and Natural equity (non-commercial privacy), which is a conformity with the Natural Law (God’s Law). To be public is to be aliened. It is to believe (love) fiction over reality (God’s “Creation”). It is to respect artifice, otherwise known as a license to live in sin through legalized adultery (adulthood). It is to be in the legal tender bosom of mammon.

The reader cannot get caught up in these terms, for this is not a debate over evolution and creationism. These are the conceits of fools, the vomit of ignorant men acting like dogs by doing their master’s bidding according to their public training. God simply means that which is self-evident. We need not personify this self-evident Reality of Nature into a white-bearded man sitting upon some cloud-strewn throne, though it is much easier to tell the story of the moral, scriptural law through such personification and anthropomorphizing of the allegorical parables of the Bible. These stories were told because most of the population was kept in illiteracy, so that the law could be comprehend vulgarly though never mastered. In today’s societies, the masses have been taught to read and write, but the language that is taught causes more confusion that that old system of purposeful illiteracy. And so the mongrel English language is known secretly as the language of illiteracy, also known as “dog-Latin.” For when we speak in this vulgar tongue of the commonalty in the legal jurisdiction, where most terms carry the opposite or opposing definitions to Reality and Nature, the gods of the courts hear only their Roman, Latin meaning, otherwise known as legalese. And so the professors of the English language are at best at the top of the illiteracy chain gang, and at worst are merely choking on their own conceit. To learn the legal language, as well as that language for which the Bible is written in, is not only to learn an entirely new language that appears exactly the same as the one we currently bark like dogs, but is also a completely figurative and metaphoric thought process that must be mastered. It is the fictional representation of reality. It is the matrix code of that which is adversarial (satanic) to God’s Nature and self-evidence, a system built completely upon the deceit of opposites, of false words describing fictional creations of legal gods. As I said before, our individual choices establish our god, and one way or another we all have a god. This is the True nature of choice, and these masters of delusion have managed to place us all into a causality loop where choice is made to appear as the actual illusion. And so we choose without comprehension of the available choice to contract with the fiction. After all, as the story is universally told, the devil may only steal our mind, body, and soul through our own voluntary contract and signature.

If I could impart one thing to the reader today so that this totality of opposition can be made clear between the organized corporations called as “religions” and what the Bible actually is, or rather what the word God (as “Jehovah”) actually means in the Bible, it would be simply this: the Truth is never that which is offensive, only defensive. Jehovah is defined as a verb, not merely an empty noun (name), whereas the word “god” is used in most instances throughout the Bible, thanks to the King James translators, as the words theos, elohim, archon, king, magistrate, prince, and other legal names and flattering titles of false gods. This word magistrate (god) is defined as kings, presidents, governors, mayors, judges, etc. And so the commonalty of goyim have been taught to despise the God of Nature by mistaken identity, as if the God of Nature is the same destructive and murdering force as the gods spoken of in the Bible. In a nutshell, the false doctrines of the corporate church teaches that God (Jehovah) is to be blamed for the actions of man (also named as “god” in the translated scriptures). And what would one expect from a false god than to translate the word king as god? And so in the simplest terms, the Bible can be summed up by merely stating that God represents Reality and Nature. That which is of God is opposed to and opposite of that which is a creation of man, as either physical or conceptual inventions, which includes the legal law of man that stands directly opposed to God, to Nature, and thus to Reality, all of which are merely words that mean the self-evident Truth. Jehovah (God) is defined simply as that which is self-existent, as that which is a self-evident Truth. And so what is of the Real is said to be of the realm of God, also known as “Creation.” All else is of the realm of fiction, also known as satan. The word satan means only that which is adversarial to God, and that which is of satan’s realm is called as art, technology, artifice, fiction, legalism, and any other term of art that represents what is Real, what is self-evident, as some legal fiction. Thus all names, flattering titles, numbers, letters patent, signs, marks, identities, reputations, and any other concept of man’s legal realm can be said to be satanic, as that which is adversarial and opposed to Reality. And so we say it is opposed to God. And so the only way to be free under God with those unalienable rights spoken about in the declaration of independence is to acknowledge the common law, which is to say we must embrace the Bible as our Highest Law – not what the corporate church doctrines state as false law, and not by joining any of man’s inventions of state licensed religions, all of which are false and opposed to the scriptural Law. We must either act the part of a man in and under the Natural Law of God, or we may choose to continue acting satanically (adversarially) to God’s Nature and Law by continuing to embrace that which is opposed to it, the surname, number, and marks of this legal beast system. In this way, that which is the self-evident Truth of Reality, of what exists despite man’s inventions, is the only defense that man has against that jurisdiction of legal fiction and false law of persons. Another way of stating this is simply that God (the self-evident Truth of Nature) and only God can set us free. Only the Highest, self-evident Truth will set you free.

But in the legal realm, all that is a confirmed and ratified lie is the established and ordained “truth,” ordained by the opinions and decisions of the gods of the courts. In the realm of the adversaries, God (self-evident Truth) and Nature are the enemy. God is offensive to the legal gods, which is why they separated their commercial state from their moral church. Only when man’s religious actions are placed Higher and supra to the pretended authority of the legally combined church and state state can man claim unalienable rights. This is the self-evident Truth that is also alluded to in the so-called declaration of independence. It is a Truth that only protects those private men who reserved all their rights in privacy from their own legal creation of that incorporation of the United States. All creations of the congress of those private gods of the several States united are placed into this holding corporation called as the district of Caesar (seizure). And so the moral of the story, the moral of the scriptures bears only one True and self-evident interpretation, which is that only that which is self-evident may set you free. Only God may set you free. Respect only of God’s Law of Nature and no other false doctrine or legal system may set you free. And our only defense as men of God is the self evidence not only of Nature, but of our True Selves. To exist without name, title, number, and mark, which is to say without any form of false legal identity, is our only defense. All other “truths” that are based on lies and legal fictions are offensive to our very Nature.

You know when the Truth presents Itself because It is undeniable no matter how hard we try, generally causing pain to our ego, as that which protects our id, the false legal id-entity that controls us mentally through the artifice of man’s law and fiction. The self-evidence of God’s Nature of Reality eats away at all fallacy and utterly destroys the ego and false-flattering titles of the ignorant fools posing as info-wariers and patriotic truthers! This is the beauty of that which is in self-evidence, the only Truth that actually exists in Nature. And it is the unveiling of this self-evidence that has become my life’s work, no matter how much it hurts.

If the reader chooses to learn these self-evident and sourced Truths as I have researched, fully sourced, and represented in this and other posts and in my upcoming works, then please do so in the Pure intent of Love and Charity for which they are offered. And please oh please dispute them with anything other than these false, second and third-hand, unenlightened, false prophets and liars. Only what is Source is self-evident. At the very least, seeing this utterly complete and reenforced lie played out by so many parrots should knock that flattering title of “truth” completely out of the minds of those who fall for this consensus-based news of the “truth” of protected lies. The substance of what is Truth is not a badge, not an empty name, it is a mentality, a verb of action as that which is in self-existence without any proof of concept or invention. Only artificial things need be named and proven to exist, for only the artifice is not self-evident. Life never needs proven. Nature never needs proven. Reality never needs proven. We either sacrifice ourselves to that which is self-evident (otherwise known as the Truth God’s Creation) or we submit ourselves to these false gods, the creators of mythology and darkness. Do your own research and stop listening to these delusional quacks. Only you can discover, recognize, and respect alone what is self-evident, and only through actual source-based research will you ever stop being a fool choking on your own conceit and love of what is the big lie, the grand delusion.

The Real, spiritual enlightenment is that the Truth will always lead one back to one’s True Self as we realize that our actual Selves have been metaphorically stolen and repurposed into fictional personas of the districted nations of Caesar. Our Inner Being is thus personified into the artifice, our false id-entity assigned at birth, and our ego formed and perfected by the time we start acting in adulthood as that artificial persona of the nation, justifying our false existence and patriotically guarding our perceived but empty stake (cross) in mammon. After all, who wants to take responsibility for their own actions nowadays? Nope, it has to be the bankers, the politicians, the priests, and the devil. We can just get insurance and kill by license.

Yet all of these are fictions…

—=—

“Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest thou also be like unto him. Answer a fool according to his folly, lest he be wise in his own conceit…”

“The legs of the lame are not equal: so is a parable in the mouth of fools. As he that bindeth a stone in a sling, so is he that giveth honour to a fool. As a thorn goeth up into the hand of a drunkard, so is a parable in the mouth of fools…”

As a dog returneth to his vomitso a fool returneth to his folly. Seest thou a man wise in his own conceitThere is more hope of a fool than of him.”

—Proverbs 26: 4-5, 7-9, 11-12 KJB

 —=—

To hear these shepherds of darkness herd their sheep even as they insult the “herd mentality” is the ultimate insult to anyone who sees through their proclaimed “truths.” To hear the slave-masters complain about their slaves even as they fill their heads with crap is the most pathetic part about this artifice, for then the sheep of these shepherds go out and complain about everyone else and never face their own self-evident responsibilities. Instead of the enlightenment of the individual through knowledge and understanding of their own place in God’s Nature and binding Law, the herd is driven further into the depths of patriotic fervor in respect and protectionism (zionism) for their pirate captors, convinced in fixing and taking back something that was never theirs in the first place and that doesn’t exist in Nature, seeking a status that is not of Reality and that can only be attained through submission to the idea that man and man alone is as god and sovereign. All legal (artificial) rights come from the king, from the private families and bloodline of “the People” who created this false system of mammon. And all nations are now being united into the “United Nations” just as all states were united into the “United States.” The parabolic warnings of the Bible are coming to fruition even as you read this.

And so let us return to the mythos surrounding the central banks of all nations, as they now stand under the World Bank of that United Nations. For the story of the Fed is only just beginning…

Edward Flaherty, an academic economist and Ph.D. in the Department of Economics at the College of Charleston, S.C., called out G. Edward Griffin’s description of the secret meeting on Jekyll Island as “conspiratorial”, “amateurish”, and “suspect”. I couldn’t agree more, and have certainly reported it as so. To cut through the rhetoric presented by Griffen in order to find the verifiable facts is difficult at best, and any work that cannot stand on its own legitimacy and source material should only be considered as what it is, Roman adversaria; the opposite of that which is self-evident.

Perhaps you should have a look.

Link–> http://publiceye.org/conspire/flaherty/Federal_Reserve.html

—=—

As with all research, verify what this man has said as well. Never take myself or anyone else at their second-hand word. The difference between shock jocks and myself is that I genuinely mean it when I say do your own research and to get off of your ass and go to the correct and only Real sources, and stop listening to these conceited fools. And never take anyone’s word without so much inner consideration, for the only way to obtain True knowledge and understanding is through constant, continuous consideration, like tossing a salad of information in your mind until all the bullshit is filtered away and only Source remains, sense without nonsense, Truth without mystery. Mistakes are easy to make with friends and leaders like these. So many lies about the Fed are so prevalent and ingrained within the patriot mythos that some even worked their way into Flaherty’s  own pontifications, just as they have in my own works over so many years. My early work was quite susceptible to this monkey dung flung so indiscriminately and without care or awareness of source.

Not ironically, my work is hardly ever reposted elsewhere. No one is offering me a writing job or new radio hosting gig because no one can sell the actual Truth. you can’t sell gold when I call bullshit on its valuation and link to mammon with its more unpopular nickname of “nation killer.” No one wants to hear the story of the golden calf of the scriptural parables, where slaves of the old system combined their gold so that they could purchase themselves into the new slave system, which is exactly the reason quoted by all gold salesmen to hoard gold. They simply can’t sell anything that depends on lies and obfuscations of the parabolic scriptural teachings for its promotion. It’s as if the former gold confiscation didn’t happen, as if somehow gold has some sex-magick appeal and mystical protection that somehow makes it anything more that a tool of mammon, a tool of enslavement, and a tool of depravity that causes men to value gold more than Life, God, and Nature itself. To the corrupted mind, everything in God’s Nature can be purchased (conquered) with money in whatever form it is respected. This is the epitome of the justification for slavery, for animal and child abuse, for pollution, and for genetically modified foods, and for so many other crimes against nature that are excused by license and by monetary compensation.

To be clear, I no longer hold any sympathy for the devil. By this I mean that, by exposing these liars and their lies as the devils they are, I seek only to break the hypnotic spell they have over their listeners and readers, and hopefully over their very own Selves, and in turn wish only to expose them to same pain and suffering caused by the destructive power of their own hypnotic but false suggestions. I seek not to make fools of anyone, for as christ said I am not here to judge anyone, but only to set them on the correct course so that their final judgement and place may be secured. We don’t realize that to be in legal citizenship is to be pre-judged (doomed) at birth. We never quite understand that before we set foot in any jurisdiction and court of the gods that created our strawman (legal person/status) we have already been pre-judged, and that a plea (prayer) to that judicial god of “innocent” is not an option. There is no innocence in the legal realm. Only a man responsible for his own actions can account himself as innocent, his only judge the self-evidence of God’s Law of Nature and duty to It. Heaven awaits us all, for heaven is merely that which is untouched by man’s fictions, the Nature of God’s Creation. Citizenship is scripturally and legally speaking a spiritual death, a mort-gage (dead pledge) in mort-main (dead hands), and the jurisdiction of the United States is nicknamed as hell. The district and jurisdiction of the United States is an open-air debtor’s prison, make no mistake about it. And only the scriptural path walked by christ and manifested through our own actions may take us out of that fictional, districted jurisdiction.

HELL – The name formerly given to a place under the exchequer chamberwhere the king’s debtors were confined. (Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th edition)

—=—

Welcome to the new age, my friends. For the franchise of hell is going global. A world of debtors is being created. For we must remember that all debt in whatever form it presents itself is a legal obligation that must be performed in legal form, a legal person (status), and so all debt is a performance debt. All debtors of the nations united under one kingdom of hell on earth must act the parts assigned and respected by them, as the world citizenship (debt obligation) of this United Nations construct and legal matrix rears its ugly head.

And what about an apology, and admission of tomfoolery?

To not verify the existence of an ending 100-year charter is inexcusable, and to promote it knowingly without verification and without apology for so many past lies and predictions should cause his media empire to fall just as much as any mainstream outlet. No apology or corrections were publicly submitted by Susanne Posel, Alex Jones, James Corbett, G. Edward Griffen, or any other con artist or useful idiot out there to my knowledge at the time of this writing, even after so many outlets have reposted and supported their rhetoric and works.

I want to be clear here that no one in their right mind should for one second consider that these agents of the planned apocalypse like Alex Jones are not aware of these fictions they sell as reality. For again we are deceived into following these false prophets of artificial, non-self-evidnet information even in our understanding of what the word apocalypse actually means.

—=—

“The Masons hold their grand festival on the day of St. John, not knowing that therein they merely signify the fish-god Oannes, the first Hermes and the first founder of the Mysteriesthe first messenger to whom the Apocalypse was givenand whom they ignorantly confound with the fabulous author of the common Apocalypse. The sun is then (midsummer day) in its greatest altitude. In this the Naros is commemorated.”

—Book of Enoch (vol. ii., p. 154)

—=—

“The miter is derived directly from the miters of the ancient pagan fish-god Dagon and the goddess Cybele.  The papal miter represents the head of Dagon with an open mouthwhich is the reason for the pointed shape and split top.”

—Ruben Joseph, excerpt from: ‘Why Are The Young People Leaving The Church ’

—=—

In their veneration and worship of Dagonthe high priest of paganism would actually put on a garment that had been created from a huge fish… The head of the fish formed a mitre above that of the old man, while its scaly, fan-like tail fell as a cloak behind, leaving the human limbs and feet exposed.”

— Austen Henry Layard, excerpt from: ‘Nineveh and Babylon’

—=—

The most prominent form of  worship in Babylon was dedicated to Dagon, later known as Ichthys, or the fish. In Chaldean times, the head of the church was the representative of Dagon, he was considered to be infallibleand was addressed as ‘Your Holiness’. Nations subdued by Babylon had to kiss the ring and slipper of the Babylonian god-kingThe same powers and the same titles are claimed to this day by the Dalai Lama of Buddhismand the Pope. Moreover, the vestments of paganism, the fish mitre and robes of the priests of Dagon are worn by the Catholic bishopscardinals and popes. Ea Enki, who is a God of Sumerian (Enki) and Babylonian (Ea) mythology… was a water god who was half manhalf fish hybrid. In Greek mythology, Ea was known as Oannes… It is believed that, in the daytime, this deity would emerge from the water and was responsible for teaching artscience and writing to the human race.

—Mary E. Walsh, excerpt from: ’Wine of Roman Babylon’ 

—=—

“At first they led a somewhat wretched existence and lived without rule after the manner of beasts. But, in the first year after the flood appeared an animal endowed with human reason, named Oannes, who rose from out of the Erythian Sea, at the point where it borders Babylonia. He had the whole body of a fishbut above his fish’s head he had another head which was that of a manand human feet emerged from beneath his fish’s tailHe had a human voiceand an image of him is preserved unto this day. He passed the day in the midst of men without taking food; he taught them the use of letterssciences and arts of all kinds. He taught them to construct citiesto found templesto compile lawsand explained to them the principles of geometrical knowledge. He made them distinguish the seeds of the earthand showed them how to collect the fruitsin short he instructed them in everything which could tend to soften human manners and humanize their laws. From that time nothing material has been added by way of improvement to his instructions. And when the sun set, this being Oannes, retired again into the sea, for he was amphibious.”

—Writings of Berossus, a 3rd century Babylonian priest

—=—

If hell is that which is adversarial to the Nature of Reality and self-evident Truth, then what in Heaven’s name can I possibly call this “truth” movement but one of the layers of that hell, existing somewhere between Fox News, Edward Bernays, Alex Jones, and the Pope?

We are taught that the apocalypse is a bad thing. But what does this word actually mean, and why would such a propagandist machine of the combined church and state be so hell-bent on obfuscating its True and self-evident meaning? Perhaps a better question is to ask what event can possibly destroy this empire built by the hands of men at the expense of all other men and through the legal fiction of false reality?

There is only one answer. It is the thing most feared by the keepers of the mysteries, of those who hide under the rose. And that is simply True knowledge.

APOCALYPSE – noun – apoc’alyps. [Gr. from to discloseand to cover.] Revelationdiscoverydisclosure. The name of a book of the New Testament, containing many discoveries or predictions respecting the future state of Christianity, written by St. John, in Patmos, near the close of the first century.(–Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1828)

REVELATION – noun – [Latin revelatusrevelo. See Reveal.] 1. The act of disclosing or discovering to others what was before unknown to them; appropriately, the disclosure or communication of truth to men by God himselfor by his authorized agentsthe prophets and apostles. How that by revelation he made known to me the mystery, as I wrote before in few words. Ephesians 3:3. 2 Corinthians 12:1. 2. That which is revealedappropriatelythe sacred truths which God has communicated to man for his instruction and directionThe revelations of God are contained in the Old and New Testament. 3. The Apocalypse; the last book of the sacred canon, containing the prophecies of St. John.(–Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1828)

OCCULT – adjective – [Latin occultusocculoob and celoto conceal.] – Hidden from the eye or understandinginvisiblesecretunknownundiscoveredundetected; as the occult qualities of matter. The occult sciences are magicnecromancy, etc. Occult lines, in geometry, are such as are drawn with the compasses or a pencil, and are scarcely visible. (–Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1828)

OCCULTATION – noun – [Latin occultatio.] 1. A hiding; also, the time a star or planet is hid from our sightwhen eclipsed by the interposition of the body of a planet. 2. In astronomy, the hiding of a star or planet from our sight, by passing behind some other of the heavenly bodies. (–Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1828)

OCCULTNESS – noun – The state of being concealed from viewsecretness. (–Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1828)

OCCULTED – adjective – Hidsecret… (–Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1828)

HID, HIDAGE – noun – [from hidea quantity of land.] An extraordinary TAX formerly paid to the kings of England for every hide of land. (–Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1828)

—=—

The whole plan, the entirety of design of these false gods of the church and state and United Nations is to cause in the minds of man a false revelation, a false apocalypse. By passing of fiction and lies as True knowledge, all of man can be manipulated and ushered into this new age system of mammon. For imagine the power of mammon when its main tool becomes cashless! This false sensationalism of unity of all nations and of all religions is ludicrous, just as the notion that the Jewish and christian Laws (the New and Old) can be practiced harmoniously together, that the Christian gentile and the Talmudic Jew can live together in equitableness when the very purpose of any nation is to create a multitude of goyim. That 1,000’s of world religions can be made into one authority under one false god and church over one false union of states by the power of legal status (world citizenship) is the final solution. For legal, religious freedom (franchise) has nothing to do with our individual actions according to our moral law, it only applies to what we think, not what we do. Expression of religion and moral law is literally illegal in a legal state.

FREEDOM OF RELIGION – Embraces the concept of freedom to believe and freedom to actthe first of which (belief) is absolute, but the second of which (action) remains SUBJECT TO REGULATION for protection of society(Black4)

—=—

Freedom of moral thought, but not freedom to act upon that conscious moral thought… This is what legal freedom is when defined by a legal corporation called government. This is not Natural freedom under God. This is tyranny named (noun) as “freedom.” Legal freedom is only a franchise of fictional persons. Governments cannot control in totality your thought processes, only your actions (anti-pro-verb). Specifically, we must recognize absolutely that the purpose of the legal law is to prevent man from acting upon his moral thoughts.

—=—

It’s impossible to have religious freedom in any nation where churches are licensed to the government.”

—Congressman George Hansen, quoted from “In Caesar’s Grip,” by Peter Kershaw

—=—

“The framers of our Constitution meant we were to have freedom of religionnot freedom from religion.”

—Billy Graham

—=—

No man can enter into a strong man’s houseand spoil his goodsexcept he will first bind the strong manand then he will spoil his house.

—Mark 3: 27, KJB

—=—

The strawman, as the legal, national citizen-ship is that bond. Our house is not our own. Our use of that artificial legal status ensures our legal performance against God, against the scriptural law as part of the common law. Our spiritual choice is nullified, though we can quit claiming to be that fictional person (i.e. adulterer/sinner) at any time we choose. The contractual relationship destroys all other considerations of Law. And the freedom of religion in legal terms is of course that which opposed to freedom of choice, for though we may not be punished for our thoughts (yet), we may and will be punished as conspirators against this legal system of government for acting upon our religious, moral thoughts, for our franchise (freedom) is false and only exists in the hell that is this open-air-prison and jurisdiction of the nations. Simply stated, the property of any United States public citizenship is not the property of the man acting in its agency. All property is registered in the strawman name, the legal fiction person, which is property of government. Thus no public man is strong. All men are in the bond of surety to their assigned legal entity of birth registration, and so all public men’s houses are despoiled by their very nature and tax (registration). This is the legal pirate cove that is the United States municipal corporation. Its sole purpose is to escheat (steal) all that is Real, from Land to personal property, away from the goyim born of the nations so that no matter where we go we are always in trespass upon the lands of the “sovereignty.” We know we are not sovereign in the view of the law because we must produce an artificial will so as to pass on out imperfect titles to property and pay a death or orphan tax on it. The law automatically recognizes the bloodline heirs of a private citizen of any State.

In the “truth” and “patriot” movements we have been trained to embrace this word “sovereignty” by name without realizing its dualistic nature. As perhaps the most misunderstood legal term out there, we mistake the Highest Law and authority of the Sovereignty of God with that of the kingdoms that claim legal, artificial “sovereignty” in name only over that of all other men. But we must understand that sovereignty cannot exist except under the doctrine of master and servant. Sovereignty is pointless without subjects or slaves beneath you. In other words, if all men were sovereign then no man would be, just as no man is free until all men are free. This totality of Natural Sovereignty under God’s Law is the only Real Sovereignty, and it signifies only that all men have abandoned all artifice and legal fiction so as to obey only the Nature and Duty of the negative, Natural Law. This state of being is heaven on earth. It is also paradox, for men will always seek to enslave or trick other men in order to cause themselves ease and vagrancy of that Highest Duty. The false artifice of sovereign nations, the gods of which are legally created titles as idols, created these nations not to free men but to publicly ensnare them in legal protectionism of their own private estates. And the United Nations and its peace-keeping force of mercenary goyim in uni-form are being assembled to protect this order of nations united to protect these private, legally sovereign bloodlines. It is not that their blood is at all special, only that it is legally recognized and not corrupted in attainder like the public masses of citizenships of the idolatrous nations. Blood and Land are intricately connected, and the absence of blood consideration is the highest goal of these pirates, so that they may overcome otherwise strong men and bind their lands into their own private estates while their tenants are none the wiser. They are simply cheaters, the root word of escheat. Their false systems of legal sovereignty are directly opposed to the scriptural Law. This sovereignty is false, a mere slave system of voluntary compliance by those in performance debt to these masters under the law of agency. It’s not Real. It’s not spiritual in any way. It is merely a modern caste system based on the old feudal state that has been renamed and reorganized, the only difference being that it is completely without honor and kept incredibly under the rose. The artificial sovereignty of the King has been replaced by the artificial sovereignty of the bloodline of the private “People.” And so we are caused to believe in the false truth that through legal means we may somehow figure out this legal system and become part of the sovereignty, which is to say become the slave-master instead of the slave. This is the strong delusion of the gods.

—=—

“We have stricken the (slave) shackles from four million human beings and brought all laborers to a common level not so much by the elevation of former slaves as by practically reducing the whole working population, white and blackto a condition of SERFDOM. While boasting of our noble deeds, we are careful to conceal the ugly fact that BY AN INEQUITOUS MONEY SYSTEM we have nationalized a system of oppression whichthough more refinedis not less cruel than the old system of chattel slavery.

–Horace Greeley (1811-1872), founder of the ‘The New-Yorker’ and ‘New York Tribune’ newspapers, speaking on post-civil war or ‘14th amendment’ citizenship

—=—

It is impossible to enslavementally or sociallya bible-reading people. The principles of the bible are the groundwork of human freedom.”

–Horace Greeley (1811-1872), founder of ‘The New-Yorker’ and ‘New York Tribune’ newspapers,

—=—

Notice that these quotes are by the same elitist man, one of the few good ones perhaps.

—=—

“In my view, the Christian religion is the most important and one of the first things in which all childrenunder a free government ought to be instructed… No truth is more evident to my mind than that the Christian religion must be the basis of any government intended to secure the rights and privileges of a free people.”

–Preface, 1828 Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language

—=—

Of course public education is designed to cause public-mindedness, and only a private man may benefit from that scriptural knowledge. As the mass of illiterates that is the general goy population collectively cheer the efforts of their private masters to eradicate the Bible scriptures from public schools, they seal their own fate and that of their future heirs into a system of total corruption and spiritual death in mammon. By corrupting each denomination of corporate churches, all of which claim the Bible as their reason for their legal existence, the public is made to despise the Bible instead of recognizing that this system of universally “Christian” churches in name and flattering title only were never intended to teach or decipher what the Bible actually instructs. The private priest class alone may have revelation (knowledge) of scripture, never the commonalty of illiterate followers of false gods. The English language (as dog-Latin) ensures that even the very fact of our own collective illiteracy is hidden behind the very words of that common (public) language spoken. Like dog’s barking at their masters, the intent of our words is taken only in their dualistic, adversarial, Latinized (Romanized) versions so that everything we say carries the opposite meaning. Every respected legal name (noun) destroys the True Nature of the Reality that name represents as a legal fiction.

But I digress…

Just what is this protective agency of that fish-god Pope’s will as a motto proprio and what does it have to do with the other central banks of all the nations?

Let us examine, from the Vatican’s own website, just what is this Financial Intelligence Authority:

—=—

THE FINANCIAL INFORMATION AUTHORITY

The Financial Information Authority (Autorità di Informazione Finanaziaria – AIF)is the competent authority of the Holy See/Vatican City State for fighting money-laundering and financing of terrorism. In that capacity, the AIF carries out the tasks of financial intelligence unit and supervisor, both for prudential purposes, and the prevention and countering of money-laundering and financing of terrorism.

Established by Pope Benedict XVI with the Apostolic Letter in form of “Motu Proprio” of 30 December 2010, AIF’s institutional mandate has been consolidated by means of the Apostolic Letter in form of Motu Proprio by Pope Francis on 8 August 2013, which assigns to the AIF the role of prudential supervision, and by means of the Apostolic Letter in form of “Motu Proprio” by Pope Francis on 15 November 2013, which approved the new StatutesThe AIF carries out its institutional activity according to the Vatican Law n. XVIII of 8 October 2013.

The AIF is a member of the Egmont Group, the GLOBAL NETWORK of financial intelligence units, and, so far, has stipulated Memoranda of Understanding with the financial intelligence units of various Countries for the purposes of COLLABORATION and exchange of information, like, inter alia, Albania, Australia, Argentine, Belgium, Cyprus, Cuba, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Malta, Monaco, Netherlands, Norway, Paraguay, Peru, Poland, Romania, San Marino, Spain, Slovenia, Switzerland, United Kingdom and United States of America.

–Palazzo San Carlo, 00120 Città Del Vaticano – Link–> http://www.aif.va/ENG/Home.aspx

—=—

For the benefit of the reader that is seldom taught the legal meanings of words, this term of the legal art understanding does not simply mean comprehension. To understand anything in legal terms is to stand under the authority of that thing, artificial as it may be, and to be in harmonious agreement with another law just as any signature on any contract expresses an under-standing to both the words of that contract and to all laws and governmental statutes that protect and secure that contractual situation between “persons.” And so the reader, as a public “citizen-ship” of any nation, should know here that with every signature we individually make in legal persona we are agreeing to every single public law created by congress and by its “independent agencies” of government, including the Federal Reserve and other central banking institutions and non-governmental (NGO) associations and institutions hired and respected by congress. No man is bound by any legal authority or law without his voluntary use of its status in legal persona. Whatever I do as “Clint Richardson” is as an agent of its creator and principal, the United States district (Caesar). This is the opposite of that state of free liberty under the Natural (God’s) Law spoken of by those Masonic founders in their federalist papers and over-parroted quotes. A national citizen is not a citizen of any private State. Nothing public is private. A citizenship is very much like the Federal Reserve, having quite limited independence within the jurisdiction (open-air prison) of United States borders, but having no actual freedom but that which is granted to it in legal franchise. A public person is not a free man, for a person is never a man, only a recreated fiction of law. A form without substance. To act in person is to act as the property of another. And the persons (ships) of all nations, like the rental cars of some rental car agency, are all bound to this international, globalist law of mammon. Whether you believe in gods or not, he who creates controls as a god. The creator of “Clint Richardson” is certainly not God, it is the United States district (bank). What is unnatural can never invoke what is natural. What is a creation of man and his artful law cannot claim the law of God and of Nature. And what is written in the Declaration of Independence is for Real men of God, not artificial persons created by governments. Only those who reserve all rights from the nation privately stand in True Liberty and Natural Freedom. This confusion between what is Real and what is fiction is the essence of that system of slavery that holds us all in its legal matrix.

We mustn’t forget three things…

  1. True “christianity” is part of the common law, unwritten and unenforceable, and has no place in the jurisdiction of the United States, only outside of it in private.
  2. The Bible bestows upon every man a choice, to face Reality (God) or exist falsely in the artificial, flattering titles of legal fiction. Thus its purpose as part of the common law is self-evident, and is used by the most evil of men to kill our highest spiritual power and will through ignorance of it.
  3. The word legal translates to that which is opposed to God, as the fictional art constituted over Nature.

If these three principals of law would be under-stood, then what man in legal citizenship under Caesar (district) would possibly continue in such a false existence? What man would continue to exist falsely in such a chimeric, false persona as this, knowing that this false existence is the realm and jurisdiction of a global system united in support and pursuit of the great delusions of mammon?

The answer, I’m afraid, is most men.

I am resigned to this notion. I accept it for what it is. And I am only writing here today that I might reach the remainder, the remnant, the seekers of self-evidence in all things as the Only Truth despite the pain of such self-evidence. You are who I seek. We must find each other, overcome, and remove ourselves from this fiction of religion, governments, and most of all money. This is my life’s goal and my works will be solely for its purpose and end.

This global system of mammon and these protection agencies that have been set up in all the key nations united in preserving this system of debt slavery is wholly supported by the Pope and thus by that Crown corporation of the Vatican. This false “Christ” (falsely anointed) head of the church and state of the world has decreed that in this den of thieves we call the banking system of the world, there must be a united effort to protect that system as the asset of the church and its city-State. This, of course, is self-evident. The actions and decrees of this and former Popes cannot be denied, and no apologist can possibly disconnect this intent from the love of money in mammon. No one can call this anything but what it self-evidently is, a protection racket against the public, legal realm instituted to ensure the debt of all nations to their central banks and of each individual “person” to the nations that created that status. To be in (under) citizen-ship is to be a debtor, to be contracted into a performance debt. A puppet on strings.

For those to whom this is a new concept, this separation of the self into a legal id-entity that removes us from Nature and causes us to act as some thing we are not, all you need to know is that whatever law you follow depends on the state of being of your Self. If you can be convinced, especially from birth and through public education and media entertainment, to act not as your True and responsible Self but as the fictional legal self of another’s persona (legal status), then nothing you possess or own is yours. Not your language, not your law, not your God, and not your stuff. All that is registered to that fictional self (citizen-ship) as a vessel of commerce of the Holy See is property of its creator (god). The creator controls, and whatever is conquered (purchased) with the patented creation of another, namely the money of each nation’s central bank, is thus the property of the creator of that money that its subjects (voluntary slaves) use in the agency of its franchise (person). This is legal, political freedom. Nothing natural about it. And this franchise of freedom and independence is what has so confounded us, causing us to believe ourselves to be as free as we believe the Federal Reserve to be. And just because there is no overlord (or congress Member) watching every move we make in our franchise of independent movement (legal freedom) throughout this commercial maze and open-air prison of jurisdiction while we act in its legal persona, we mistakenly call this as the Pure Freedom of privacy. The Fed is as private as any citizen-ship is, which is to say that only an idiot would believe, based on actual source and law, that either one of these is free of government (legal control).

I have yet to find a better definition and description of these facts than that of William C Anderson’s Dictionary of Law from 1889. Not only does he reveal the ultimate difference and more accurately the total opposition between the True and false corporate flattering title of the typical citizenship as a “Christian” in name only and without works, we also can see that when it comes to the judicial function of the administrative courts and justices (magistrate gods) we pray (plead) to for forgiveness and salvation, the Bible or for that matter any written or unwritten moral law or compass is totally absent in all decisions and opinions of these public courts. They are Godless, which means that no man may ever stand in self-evidence nor with unalienable rights under God (Natural Law). To be perfectly clear, these legal courts can only see legal things. Man must appear in the person of the state (district and circuit jurisdiction of Caesar) in order to be heard by that god of fiction. The court jurisdiction is for persons, not men. Only persons and their agents (attorneys) may be heard. A man of God is not welcome in these places, and are Barred from that system of pretended justice in commerce. Only things of mammon may apply and be artificially seen and remedied. And so all of you so-called “Christians” who follow in the footsteps of your legal person, your strawman, instead of following in the footsteps of christ, you will be judged by men as your gods because your person is pre-judged (doomed) at birth. You are acting and appearing as that which you are not, and you will be treated accordingly. You will be considered only as a legal entity that cannot be harmed, for fiction cannot be Naturally harmed.

This is not religion, damn it! This is reality. Organized religion is exclusively reserved for the weak-minded. Acting religiously is only for those of strong will and Pure character and intent, the remnant as it were, the true nonconformists. For the following of christ is not conformity to any thing, it is only the embracing of and acknowledgement of that which is self-evident Truth. To act religiously or spiritually is only the abandonment of all artifice and fiction. It is Life.

I want you to read this again:

CHRISTIANITY – The system of doctrines and precepts taught by Christ; the religion founded by Christ. Christianity is said to be part of the common law. “Christianity is parcel of the laws of Englandandthereforeto reproach the Christian religion is to speak in subversion of the law.” “The essential principles of natural religion” and “of revealed religion, are a part of the common lawso that any person reviling or subverting or ridiculing them may be prosecuted at common law.” “The true sense of the maxim is that the law will not permit the essential principles of revealed religion to be ridiculed and reviled.” Christianity is a part of the common law of Pennsylvania in the qualified sense that its divine origin and truth are admitted, and therefore it is not to be maliciously and openly reviled and blasphemed against, to the annoyance of believers or the injury of the publicNot Christianity founded upon any particular religious tenets; but Christianity with liberty of conscience to all menThe maxim does not mean that Christianity is an established religionnor that its precepts, by force of their own authorityform part of our system of municipal lawnor that the courts may base their judgments upon the Biblenor that religious duties may be penally enforcednor that legal discrimination in favor of Christianity is allowed. The best features of the common law, especially those which regard the family and social relations, if not derived from, have at least been improved and strengthened bythe prevailing religion and the teachings of its sacred BookBut the law does not attempt to enforce the precepts of Christianity on the ground of their sacred character or divine originSome of those preceptsthough we may admit their continual and universal obligation, we must nevertheless recognize as being incapable of enforcement by human lawsThose preceptsmoreoveraffect the heart, and address themselves to the conscience; while the laws of the state can regard the outward conduct onlyfor which reasons CHRISTIANITY IS NOT A PART OF THE LAW OF THE LAND IN ANY SENCE WHICH ENTITLES THE COURTS TO TAKE NOTICE OF AND BASE THEIR JUDGEMENTS UPON ITexcept so far they can find that its precepts and principles have been incorporated in and made a component part of the law of the StateThe maxim can have no reference to the law of the National government, SINCE THE SOURCES OF THAT LAW ARE THE CONSTITUTION, TREATIES, AND ACTS OF CONGRESS(–William C. Anderson’s Dictionary of Law, 1889)

–=–

This single brilliant discourse utterly destroys the false “patriot” and “truther” movement in one fail swoop, for whenever the origin and foundation of any opinion is false, the resulting occurrence of opinionated rhetoric based on nothing but a false legal religion and dialectic (logic) is all that manifests. What you have just read is the very definition of the separation of church and state, which is to say the separation of men from their religion and into a purely legal society. As long as the choice is available in the common law, the slave-state (nation) may exist as a district (seizure, distress, distraint) upon those men. The law of man may rule over any man who abandons God and accepts the idolatrous nation as his magistracy (god). And so we may either act in the spirit of our religious Self or we may act in the false persona of some nation. Either way we will have a god. To be without a nation is to be under God (Jehovah) in the Reality of Nature. This is considered a self-evident Truth, and belief in God is certainly no requirement for a self-evident Truth to Exist. The word Jehovah is defined as self-existence, which is that which is self-evident or the Whole Oneness of Nature (Creation). Man is, whether he likes or admits it or not, part of that Oneness. But its Highest law and protections may only manifest through his or her individual actions or works. The second we take upon our True Selves the name, number, trade-mark, and flattering title of another, we loose our connection to Nature and Its Law and must accept the contracted dis-ease that is required by our respect of false legal authority. Whatever we do, there is some god above us. And even the false notion of sovereignty requires a Higher Law and also respect of the slave system of legal law in some nation. For no man may be sovereign without slaves beneath him. And no man may be free until all men are free. Sovereignty is nothing more and nothing less than a legal status, legal being opposed to God, as the flattering titles of pretenders. They are the creators of church and state. They are the controllers. The land lords. The gods.

—=—

“For all the gods of the nations are idols…”

—Psalms 96:5, KJB

—=—

Thanks to the organized musings and purposeful misdirection of Alex Jones and those who emulate his fear campaigns and corporate business model in the false and empty name of “truth,” we continue to live in the lie designed for us while patriotically supporting the very nation that designed it. We suffer from the worst kind of Stockholm Syndrome imaginable. And our denomination of legalized religion merely solidifies that false nature and causes us to respect the legal state, or that which is opposed to God as the self-evident Reality of Nature and Its undeniable Truth.

To be clear, no subject will ever change this government or its system. We are not its creator nor its controller. The Jones patriot model invites everything but the correct course of action, which as the Bible instructs is to simply and utterly “leave her,” to leave the fictional cities and jurisdictions by overcoming their fictions of law by following by christ’s example. While the church preaches the false prophesy of God or Christ returning from the dead, the reality of the Bible scripture is that christ can only manifest through the actions of man acting christ-like. The spirit of God’s Law is personified as christ, and the spirit of man may only be recognized and protected by his actions thereof. Again, this is not some membership to some corporation posing as a “religion,” this is a Real Life lived only in the True Nature of Reality.

The fool in his own conceit and flattering legal title of “Christian” may be equally offended by this scriptural Truth as he who purports to carry the false, flattering title of “atheist” or “anarchist.” Yet all of these men acting pretending such false identities carry their person in the form of a driver’s license, a passport, a credit or debit ATM card, and every other sign and trade-mark of the voluntary slavery of citizenship. Trade merely means commerce, and its mark is our use of its name and “consumer protections” in legal trade under a national system of debt money in mammon. Our signature on any contract is the highest legal sign of our individual spiritual death and civil, artificial life.

—=—

“An addition [to a name] proves or shows minority or inferiority.”

— Additio probat minoritatem. (Black4)

—=—

When a man is made a spiritual peer he loses his surnamewhen a temporalhis Christian name.”

—Jonathan Swift, Thoughts on various subjects, moral & diverting

—=—

The rights of the individuals are restricted only to the extent that they have been voluntarily surrendered by the citizenship to agencies of government.”

—City of Dallas v Mitchell, 245 S.W. 944

—=—

You see, the problem isn’t the vulgar belief in the doctrines of man’s religion, it is a lack of religious, moral action against evil and artifice by otherwise strong men who are confused and bound by legal fiction and disinformation. The moral Law is not some actor’s script that is practiced like an attorney practices law or a doctor practices medicine, for these are all false and flattering titles. The path of christ is the example never followed by the flatteringly entitled “Christians” because they are trained from birth to love and respect not God but the very “law of the land” that is opposed to God. The churches are legal corporations bound under the legal state and its fictional (antichrist, anti-God, anti-Nature) law, and are therefore forced to respect the legal law and its government for their very legal existence! To be a member of a religion is not to be or act religiously. For the “Christian” is as much an empty flattering title as the “atheist” the second we touch money and participate in the legal system of contract (devilry) and mammon. Only our actions, our works, define who and what our Self is and which god it subscribes to in surety and bond. A promise (vow) to God is opposed to an oath to government in abuse of God’s name. A pledge to fiction is a blasphemy to God, a rejection of Reality and embracing of the artifice of legal, adversarial (satanic) things. The bullshit spouted by the corporate church prevents us from contemplating this notions as anything other than religious gobbilygook, and yet these tenants are the very foundation of the law. The deception is respectably complete, for the actions of a religious man are mistaken for the false show of a scripturally ignorant member of a legally incorporated religion. Our law can never be both legal and spiritual, for these laws are purposefully opposed to one another, just as our actual Being in True religion can never be based on any of the false doctrines of corporations in name only. For as with any other source, the Bible is completely ignored in all legal settings, including so-called “Christian” churches. No man in his right mind and with due diligence of the scriptures would lay a hand on any form of money, would ever attend or claim membership to any state or religion by any name, and would never accept these magistrates (gods) and archons such as the pope, the kings and queens, and the presidents of municipal corporations such as Washington D.C. as their law-makers.

RELIGIOUS MEN – Such as entered into some monastery or convent. In old English deeds, the vendee was often restrained from aliening to “Jews or religious men” lest the lands should fall into mortmain (dead hands). Religious men were CIVILLY DEAD(Black1)

RELIGIOUS USE – See CHARITABLE USES(Black1)

—=—

What is the cure for money and debt to mammon? Pure and utter charity. The doing of all things without valuation, without credit or debt, and without expectation of anything in return for our actions. This is the opposing force, the absolute Love that must always be the goal of all our actions. This is the basis of the moral, scriptural law. This is the choice we must choose, for all other roads lead to Rome. This is the best example of self-evident Truth. It can only be denied if we respect and fear fiction over Reality.

And yet here we are, stuck in the middle of financial tyranny that can only exist if men have faith in the existence and valuation of money, the god of mammon. We have accepted the artifice as Real and denied the God of Nature. We have denied Reality and placed monetary value on everything Real, including our Selves. And this is the true definition of evil, its root being the false-valuation of Life itself as something that can be conquered (purchased) by money. For mammon is not money, money is only a tool thereof. The true evil is valuation, the estimation and consideration of all things not by their priceless Nature but by its price in fiat currency and debt (the lie that is “credit”). We no longer act as men but as false, legal personas. Slaves.

Though all things can be valued in money, money is valued in nothing at all. To call this as the greatest lie of that which is satanic (adversarial) to God and Nature is the understatement of the age. And the pope now wishes to protect that system of the adversarial from “laundering” and “terrorism.” In other words, the cheats that are the controllers of money, the pirates that use money as the tool for contractual enslavement of all peoples and nations, are protected by that highest fraud of organized (universal) “Christian” religion. For a world government must be based on a world currency, and a world government cannot exist unless it is married (justified) by a global church. They must be married, but the also must be separated. But separation is not annulment, but a legally binding contract of both parties. What is separate is still married. And the separation of church and state is only the separation of moral and civil (legal) law, so that the church has no power over the state, but still lies in marriage with its actions and in justification of its crimes against man, Nature, and God. Do not be fooled by this Masonic treatise of separation of church and state, for the slave-master cannot afford to be bound by the moral, scriptural law when acting commercially in his holding of slaves. His power relies upon the false doctrines of his created corporate religion, and his law over men depends solely on those men not under-standing the scriptural law of the Bible as the very foundation of the common law.

—=—

We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge, or gallantry, would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a netOur Constitution was made only for a moral and religious peopleIt is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”

—John Adams (The Works of John Adams, ed. C. F. Adams, Boston: Little, Brown Co., 1851, 4:31)

—=—

Most public-minded fools educated in public places and indoctrinated with the public law of the usurious gods of congress and their magistrates in judicial seats at Bar would view this quote by one of the corporate founders of the United States as purely religious drivel. And yet this is the very foundation of law. For the Bible is indeed the foundation of the moral law as part of the unwritten common law. We either follow it by following the teachings and footsteps of christ in action and in works or we follow that which is opposed to it, bearing the false symbol of a cross while worshiping only the legal system of the controllers of mammon. There is no other law, for all aspects of the law begin with this foundational choice. And so we have been convinced that what we see as the corporate religions of the state are the only choice we have if we wish to practice our religious works. We have been taught to associate the church with the Bible, which could not be any more opposite. For when the words of the scriptures are translated by the priest-class to justify the legal incorporation of that church and the legal, licensed, flattering title of the priest, in no way can the true intention of the scriptures be taught genuinely by the false prophet, for-profit “priest.” The intent of the professor of that corporate religion must support its doctrine over that of the actual scriptures, just as the state pretends to be a “Christian” nation, using that term as merely a flattering title among its own created wasteland of legalism.

As the scriptures state, the True church is not a building created by the hands of men, but is the men who together follow the religious practices of the moral law by the example of christ. This is True religion. All else is merely the work of Masonry, of buildings constructed by the hands of men and made to be more “sacred” than the scriptures and the men who would follow them. But that which is artificial and held sacred is actually the opposite. Sacred means cursed, for all fiction is a curse when held above Nature and without self-evidence. The True followers of christ were fed to the lions by Caesar, remember? For no law of man could control them. Their existence was of the Pure self-evidence of the Highest Law.

We, however, contently sit in the stands of the colosseum, modernly recreated into the cushy couch in front of our big-screen televisions connected in a grid of false information and artificial intelligence, watching with a feeling of exhilaration or pretended helplessness as Caesar’s pets.

So what is this modern Caesar’s goals with this global network of Financial Information Authorities?

For a fair notion of this, let us see just what this Egmont Group is.

—=—

About the Egmont Group

Recognizing the importance of international cooperation in the fight against money laundering and financing of terrorism, a group of Financial Intelligence Units (FIUs) met at the Egmont Arenberg Palace in Brussels, Belgium, and decided to establish an informal network of FIUs for the stimulation of international co-operation. Now known as the Egmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units, Egmont Group FIUs meet regularly to find ways to promote the development of FIUs and to cooperate, especially in the areas of information exchange, training and the sharing of expertise.

Link–> http://www.egmontgroup.org

—=—

The Egmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units

About:

Recognizing the importance of international cooperation in the fight against money laundering and financing of terrorism, a group of Financial Intelligence Units (FIUsmet at the Egmont Arenberg Palace in BrusselsBelgium, and decided to establish an informal network of FIUs for the stimulation of international co-operation. Now known as the Egmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units, Egmont Group FIUs meet regularly to find ways to promote the development of FIUs and to cooperate, especially in the areas of information exchangetraining and the sharing of expertise.

The Egmont Group has evolved over the years and is currently (2015comprised of 151 member FIUs. The 2012 FATF Recommendations expect that FIUs apply for membership with the Egmont Group, therefore, the Egmont network of FIUs is expected to grow even further in the coming years.

After over 15 successful years of the Egmont Group, and with the publication of the revised FATF 40 Recommendations in 2012, it was necessary to amend the governing documents of the organization. The Charter Review Project team has produced a complimentary set of documents, which are interlinked and reference relevant FATF Recommendations. The revised Egmont Charter (2013)Egmont Principles for Information Exchange and Operational Guidance for FIUs provide the foundation for the future work of the Egmont Group and contribute to greater international cooperation and information exchange between FIUs.

The goal of the Egmont Group is to provide a forum for FIUs around the world to improve cooperation in the fight against money laundering and the financing of terrorism and to foster the implementation of domestic programs in this field. This support includes:

  • Expanding and systematizing international cooperation in the reciprocal exchange of information;
  • Increasing the effectiveness of FIUs by offering training and promoting personnel exchanges to improve the expertise and capabilities of personnel employed by FIUs;
  • Fostering better and secure communication among FIUs through the application of technology, such as the Egmont Secure Web (ESW);
  • Fostering increased coordination and support among the operational divisions of member FIUs;
  • Promoting the operational autonomy of FIUs; and
  • Promoting the establishment of FIUs in conjunction with jurisdictions with an AML/CFT program in place, or in areas with a program in the early stages of development.

Link–> http://www.egmontgroup.org/international-organizations

—=—

This is akin to the notion of United Nations “peacekeeping” forces, another way of saying a global army that beats down nations and people when they don’t wish to cooperate in this globalist banking cartel organized internationally under the Pope (universal church) and United Nations (universal state). While in a prima facie way (on the face of it without further evidence) this sounds like a good thing, we cannot forget that this is mammon. This is what enslaves us all, both individuals (in person) and through the particular nation and jurisdiction we in nativity (captivity) within. And so billions starve so that money can be hoarded and invested.

Globalism is not what we think it is, and will not be accomplished how we keep expecting it to. Our public-mindedness gets in the way of out discernment of evil, for we live in the midst of the designs of evil in artifice. Globalism is not government, but governance. The difference is that governments are separate, while governance is universal. At this point in time, while we still play the game of thrones of nations, pretending their borders tangibly exist in Nature and also that we are somehow a part of them, global governance is being more and more universally cast about each nation to create that one, united body politic. The standards and practices put forward by countless private associations such as the International Bar Association (to which all other national Bar associations are members), Codex Alimentarius Commission (a body that was established in early November 1961 by the Food and Drug Administration of the United Nations (FAO), the World Health Organization (WHO), and the Government Accounting Standars Board (GASB) to which all government financial statements (audits) are slowly being made beholden to, we find that all individual governments of nations are being governed by these private, non-governmental agencies and associations, commonly called non-governmental organizations of NGO’s. And so while the nations will continue to appear to be sovereign in their legal capacity, and while the private landholders of each State of the nations and countries will certainly retain such sovereignty, the notions they created are all being happily made to conform to these outside influences, best practices, initiatives, declarations, and other forms of corporate governance that are essentially creating one giant corporation of ignorant plebes that love their enslavement.

—=—

The real hopeless victims of mental illness are to be found among those who appear to be most normal Many of them are normal because they are so well adjusted to our mode of existence, because their human voice has been silenced so early in their livesthat they do not even struggle or suffer or develop symptoms as the neurotic doesThey are normal not in what may be called the absolute sense of the wordthey are normal only in relation to a profoundly abnormal society. Their perfect adjustment to that abnormal society is a measure of their mental sicknessThese millions of abnormally normal peopleliving without fuss in a society to whichif they were fully human beingsthey ought not to be adjusted.

―Aldous Huxley, Brave New World Revisited

—=—

The mass of illiterates will certainly adjust, for without such an adjustment, without taking the mark of this collective machine as its beast, they will not be able to participate in the cashless society being set up as we speak. Their phones will not work. Their connection to the A.I. will be shut off. Their property will be sexed by its rightful owner, the owner of their legal person (status). Their worthless lives will be more valuable than Life Itself. They will beg to be part of this global structure of the artifice of mammon.

A glanse at the listed partnerships of this Egmont Group tells a tale of its own, and let’s us know what the pope and vatican truly support.

The following organizations are linked to their perspective websites…

—=—

International Partner Orgs

International Partners

—=—

Guilt by association? Really think this is a fallacious comparison?

At this point, I am not sure I can provide anything more as to what is happening right now all around you. You either choose to see the self-evidence of what this is or you continue to suffer it. I hold little hope of any future but the more organized hell of nations united into a more fluid version of we have become accustomed to. I have little faith in the zombie public that they may ever wake themselves up by abandoning their false truths in acceptance of the pain and anguish that Reality will deal to their artificial lives and collections of insured stuff. But I look forward to some future day when those of us who can see and accept the harshest and most beautiful parts of Reality  for what they Truly are, and live together in that remnant. And I look with sadness at what I know is to come, as this false enlightenment of false religion and law overcomes even the most ardent of strongholds as technology (artifice) causes the best of moral men to succumb to the temptations and inducements of mammon.

—=—

There’s nothing in the world so demoralizing as money.” 

―Sophocles, Antigone

—=—

“All men make mistakes, but a good man yields when he knows his course is wrong, and repairs the evil. The only crime is pride.” 

―Sophocles, Antigone

—=—

It is ironic that as I uncover and speak the Truth in its self-evidence evermore clearly that I am offered less and less airtime for interviews on the radio. It appears that the “truth” movement is quite unwilling to hear about its name-sake, and the imaginations of men have thrust us all into a hopeless delusion. And so I leave you with this, the parabolic predictions of the scriptures.

—=—

“And for this cause God shall send them strong delusionthat they should believe a lieThat they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.”

—2 Timothy 2: 11-12, KJB

—=—

And he causeth all, both small and greatrich and poorfree and bond, to receive a mark… And that no man might BUY OR SELLsave he that had the markor the name of the beastor the number of his name.”

—Revelation 13: 16-17, KJB

—=—

Now we might finally see what these two oft-quoted but totally misunderstood verses actually mean. For this word “his” as used in reference to the “number of HIS name” is actually the word autos, Strong’s #G846, which carries the meaning of a personal pronoun of the third person, of the false self, the legal strawman. All the names of Caesar’s realm are registered with numbers, and the number of the name referenced here is indeed the legal persona we pretend to be in agency. We are caused to be beasts of burden in lading, and very soon we will not be able to participate in this system of mammon without that social security number of our name, as managed by the International Social  Security Association (ISSA) of the United Nations. This was not some monster or creature from any etherial real or island, this is our own agentic, fictional, legal persona. This is a parable about exactly what is happing today, the voluntary surrender of God’s authority and the unalienable rights so-called that exist only in that realm of Reality and Nature.

The less popular verse that the frar-mongorers seem to forget to share is this one, for there can be a happy ending for those who do not sit and wait for some supernatural (above Nature) false god to return and save them, for those who realize that the teachings of christ were a do-it-yourself instruction manual for the spiritual man.

—=—

“And I saw as it were a sea of glass mingled with fire: and them that had gotten the victory over the beast, and over his image, and over his markand over the number of his name, stand on the sea off glass, having the harps of God.”

–Revelation 15:2, KJB

—=—

The word “harp,” as Strong’s #G2788 – kithara – has only the metaphorically meaning of “the music of the Bible, to which the praises of God are sung in heaven.” In other words, those following the Word (Law) of God, this word “Word” as capitalized meaning the “Son” of God as the only spiritual example, and who fear only what will happen if that Highest Law is not followed, these are the remainder; the remnant. The word harp is not a noun but a verb, an action, a song (hymn) not only sung but followed in action.

If you want to know more, if you truly seek the meanings of these things through the sourced and often ancient intention of the origin of the words used, please acquire my voluminous works to be posted soon for free at StrawmanStory.info. Though and original work, this has been but a small, general overview of that larger project, and whatever questions are left unanswered here are covered in triplicate in that work. I will announce on this blog when Volume One that work is complete and posted free for download only at the website listed above. And please know that this work is absolutely meant to be freely shared, not for-profit and gain, nor for usurious purposes, not to be employed in commerce, but to share this not-so-hidden knowledge that has been kept a mystery from us in plain sight throughout the ages. Play it forward…

My latest interview on the subject of the false perceptions of the federal reserve can be found here (caution – wordy dirds used):

Link–> https://corporationnationradioarchives.wordpress.com/2016/05/08/clint-patrick-join-the-shali-lama/

—=—

Please note that this post has been self-edited on the spot, and so any mistakes the reader may have found are certainly welcome to be shared. Please leave corrections in separate comments that can be deleted, and not mixed with normal comments. And dare I ask for sources by any contrarians? Thanks.

.

–Clint Richardson (Realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Tuesday, May 10th, 2016

The Word-Smith Fallacy


Quick rant here…

When one hears an excuse enough times, especially one that is blatantly outrageous in its underlying con-text, it sometimes causes one to boil over with the urge to lash out and utterly destroy the character of the one using the excuse.

In this case, having just heard such a term used for the 100th time at least, I’d like instead to practice my repose and dissect the problem calmly and rationally.

It is often the case that people in their discourse and cognitive dissonance use the term “wordsmith” in a dualistic fashion to defend whatever disposition they find themselves in. This term is used as a single phrase that implies a two-fold meaning, one being the defensive notion that “I am not a wordsmith,” while at the same time offensively inferring that “only a wordsmith would say such things.” In other words, the use of this term singlehandedly stops the conversation and thus the furtherance of knowledge sharing, and at the same time belittles the speaker or writer by creating an ad hominem attack on the character of he who studies and attempts to use words correctly. Amazingly, this seems to be a very popular response when the Reality of things, specifically the artful and alternative legal and metaphorical meaning of words of art, is presented and verified by multiple sources.

And so I am creating an new logical fallacy here, by the name of “The Wordsmith fallacy,” though logic and reason are nowhere to be found in its use.

So let me be perfectly clear while at the same time venting a bit of repressed and pent up aggression when I say this:

IF YOU AREN’T A WORDSMITH THEN YOU ARE FUCKING ILLITERATE!!!

There. I said it. Feels surprisingly liberating, really.

—=—

“Am I therefore become your enemy,
because I tell you the TRUTH?”

—Galatians 4:16, KJB

—=—

The synonyms of this term wordsmith are not many, those being “writer” and “author.”

–WordNet 3.0, Farlex clipart collection. 2003-2012 Princeton University, Farlex Inc.

In its most simplistic definition, we find the following:

1. fluent and prolific writer, especially one who writes professionally.
2. An expert on words.
American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fifth Edition, 2011, by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company.

1: a person who works with wordsespecially:  a skillful writer

 –Merriam-Webster, Incorporated, online, 2015 

Controlled by words…

The legislature is the author of law. The court administers that law and writes opinions. The president writes executive orders and presidential directives. The attorneys at bar write everything else, from procedure to rules of evidence to the over 100 Uniform Codes.

Oh, but they are just wordsmiths.

Sure asshole, and their skillful writings, being experts on the terms of art of the legal language just happened to enslave you and your illiterate family and their illiterate forefathers before them for generations.

Yeah, but they’re just wordsmiths!

Right dickweed, that’s the point. Because you are not. Because every contract you sign, every law you are bound in surety to follow, every flattering title you pretend, and every aspect of your life is controlled by their words. Yep, they smithed your person (status), they smithed your license, your social security card, and hell, they are even the smiths of the banking laws, which let’s face it, that number’s game is a whole other language most of us are also quite illiterate at.

Sure, but they are still just wordsmiths.

How fucking long can we play this game? How many times can you play this fallacy? How long can you “stick with stupid?”

Not ironically, there is already a word to describe this fallacious tool of idiocracy that has long been in existence, and of course each word leads to a connect-the-dots story to be told:

WORD-CATCHER – noun – One who CAVILS at words.

CAVIL – verb intransitive – 1. To raise captious and frivolous objections; to find fault without good reason; followed by at. It is better to reason than to cavil2. To advance futile objections, or to frame sophisms, for the sake of victory in an argument verb transitive – To receive or treat with objections. Wilt thou enjoy the good. Then cavil the conditions. – noun – False or frivolous objections; also, A FALLACIOUS KIND OF REASON, bearing some resemblance to truth, ADVANCED FOR THE SAKE OF VICTORY.

CAVILER – noun – One who CAVILS; one who is apt to raise captious objections; a captious disputant.

CAPTIOUS – adjective – 1. Disposed to find fault, or raise objections; APT TO CAVIL, as in popular language, it is said, apt to catch at; as a captious man2. Fitted to catch or ensnare; insidious; as a captious question. 3. Proceeding from a CAVILING DISPOSITION; as a captious objection or criticism.

SOPHISM  noun – [Latin sophisma.] A specious but fallacious argument; asubtilty in reasoning; an argument that is not supported by sound reasoning, or in which the inference is not justly deduced from the premises. When a false argument puts on the appearance of a true one, then it is properly called a sophism or fallacy.

–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language

So, is it fair to say that using the term wordsmith to escape discourse and ensnare the conversation is but a captious, sophist method of fallacious rhetoric? Or am I being too damned word-smithery for you?

At this point I have figured out the whole game, how everything was stolen from us through attainder and escheat, and how the feudal system is alive and well through contract, for the words of the contract make the law.

Oh, but those are just words, right?

There I go again. Damn wordsmith.

Well, I leave you with this final thought. In overcoming my own arrogance in using the English language in the pointless rhetoric we are bombarded with everyday, I was presented with a piece of information that I could not have imagined to be true, and one I followed to its suprising end. It spawned a whole discourse on the legal language, in the form of my upcomming works, an encyclopedic journey through legalese. And nothing I have ever done has been more enlightening, revealing just how illiterate I was in using the language I learned in public schools; the one given to us to keep us dumb to the designs of those wordsmiths we complain so much about but never learn their art.

And so to be clear, here is what you think you know.

DOG-LATINThe Latin of ILLITERATE PERSONS; Latin WORDS put together on the ENGLISH GRAMMATICAL SYSTEM.

–Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition

You see, my fallaciously caviler detractors, a slave-master never teaches his slaves his mysteries, never revealing the artful law and its structure of words that entangles him in intangible chains. He keeps his slaves illiterate, spiritually and deductively, just as the priest-class has kept the multitude ignorant of its words for many centuries, so that the people may listen to the wordsmiths (priests) rather than read the Source and True meaning of their words.

The lawmakers will never teach the general population that which they seek to control them with, keeping their private language as their secretive terms of art, revealing them only under oath in private associations; conspiratorial combinations of men acting as agents (attorneys), as officers of the court (crown). And guess what, the translators of the Bible too will never re-smith it into anything but dog-Latin, so that despite the fact that there are more Bibles than people on this planet and that they are given away free and can be found available in every hotel room, these wordsmiths of the king ensured that you would never be able to read it’s words in their true intent. For they only teach us dog-Latin. They keep us all public-minded, through public-education, by the vulgar public language, while they privately control the “higher” one to ensure constant confusion. The Bible is written in the king’s language, legalese; as a mostly parabolic metaphor. And the legal fiction is opposed to dog-Latin.

—=—

“All intelligent thoughts have already been thought; what is necessary is only to try to think them again.”

—Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

—=—

And so, my illiterate compatriots, when you finally figure out that every word you say in dog-Latin carries the opposite meaning of the legal wordsmith in a black robe you are speaking to, perhaps then you will comprehend why you always loose in court. Why you can’t figure out how to exit their system based on their artful words. Why you can’t quite grasp how you are tricked into volunteering to be subject to them. And why you always turn away from perfectly good conversations simply because you can’t speak the language that sounds exactly like your own, public, dumbed down version.

So learn the language or continue to eat shit.

SHYSTERnoun -“unscrupulous lawyer,” 1843, U.S. slang, probably altered from German Scheisser “incompetent worthless person,” from Scheisse “SHIT” (n.), from Old High German skizzan “to defecate” (see shit (verb)).

–Etymonline.com

It’s up to you…

—=—

The roots of language are
irrational and of a magical nature
.” 

—Jorge Luis Borges, Prologue to “El otro, el mismo.”

—=—

“Names are an important key to what a society values. Anthropologists recognize naming as one of the chief methods FOR IMPOSING ORDER ON PERCEPTION.”

—David S. Slawson

—=—

“There exists, for everyone, a sentence – a series of WORDS – that has the power to destroy you. Another sentence exists, another series of WORDS, that could heal you. If you’re lucky you will get the second, but you can be certain of getting the first.”

―Philip K. Dick, quoted from: ‘VALIS’

—=—

“…and the chief priests and the scribes sought how they might take him by CRAFT, and put him to death.”

—Mark 14:1, KJB

—=—

“In politics, nothing happens by accident.
If it happens, you can bet
it was planned that way.”

—President Franklin D. Roosevelt

—=—

“In doubtful cases, the presumption always is in behalf of the CROWN.”

—Latin Maxim, AMBIGUIS CASIBUS SEMPER PRAESUMITUR PRO REGE. Lofft, Append. 248. (Blacks 4th)

—=—

“The latter part of a wise man’s life is taken up in curing the FOLLIES, PREJUDICES, and FALSE OPINIONS he had CONTRACTED in the former.”

—Jonathan Swift, ‘Thoughts On Various Subjects, Moral & Diverting’
—=—

Cure yourself, or stand in painful prejudice and ignorance. But keep your fallacy and false opinions away from me! For your dis-ease is not medical, but contractual. And the only solution is end of contract. No really, the word solution in legalese means only one thingend of contract.

Oh, but that’s just word-smithing again…

.

–Clint Richardson (Realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Saturday, January 23, 2016

 

 

Corporation Nation Radio, Now History (His Story)


It is with profound comfort and sadness that after more than 2 years I have decided to cease broadcasting with Republic Broadcasting Network 5 days a week. This decision reflects nothing regarding that station or its employees, and I wish to thank John Stadtmiller for trusting and allowing me such a platform in such a prime time. Republic is unfortunately a remnant of the old model of network radio being systematically abused, attacked, and made obsolete by the technology of the internet. John is fighting one hell of a battle to keep RBN breathing and even to keep the lights on. Many similar stations have fallen by the same methods, and to the fact that now anyone with a cheap consumer microphone can upload their own show into the digital ether. This ability is not, as many believe, a new kind of glorious digital liberty as much as it is a destructive anarchy of unchecked and non-vetted information.

With that said, and with the broadcast sphere of Youtube and do-it-yourself internet radio personalities all selling their own brand of perceptive virtual reality (i.e. “truth”) for monetary kickbacks, the saturation effect is in my opinion a well-played tool by those who wish to obfuscate legitimacy in alternative broadcasting.

And so I have decided to focus my time in finishing what is now destined to be a three-volume work, my book series called “Strawman: The Real Story Of Your Artificial Person,” realizing that all of these digital creations may be gone tomorrow, erased from the digital ether, and leaving nothing behind to show for it. I look forward to creating an actual work in book-form that is immune from that red button of virtual and digital destruction and censorship, and even from the false flag “EMP” that may accomplish the same trick.

The first volume of this work will be free to download at my other website soon, and I will announce its posting in (.pdf) format for free download in the next couple of months. Instructions on how to obtain a hard copy (unpublished, not public, non-commercial) will be included within. As it is a private work, it will not be available by drone from Amazon or any other retail source, and is not “commercially” available in any way. It may only be obtained from myself. You will understand why this was my choice, my election when you read it.

LINK –> StrawmanStory.info

While this privilege lasts, the internet gods are allowing my archives to be available for listening and download, again free of charge, at the external site listed below.

Special thanks to Drew Carter for not only being with me from the beginning, answering the call to archive these shows, but also for creating this searchable spreadsheet of notes and links for each show and other interviews I’ve done since on other networks. At this link and in this spreadsheet you will find links to all 487 shows plus descriptions of guests and their websites.

LINK –> https://corporationnationradioarchives.wordpress.com/2016/01/01/whew-data-entry-complete/

This spreadsheet may be updated with future shows where I am guest, and  these shows will be posted on the archive site if Drew has the time and gumption.

Of course, the original archives (with commercials not cut out) will be on the RBN website as well.

To the listener, please bear in mind that this show was a learning experience especially for myself, and so was a continuum of learning and shared knowledge as my guests and myself unraveled the not-so-hidden mysteries. And of course we will never in any of our lifetimes know it all. The point is that show #400 may include the presumption of information learned in show #300. In other words, because we have never tried to sell anything on this show, keeping its intent pure and charitable, we were actually there to learn and to teach without such low and mean distractions and monetary considerations. And so like in any school setting, missing the first half of lessons or not learning the early mathematical theories and answers may mean that later information is not able to be comprehended fully. And of course much of this journey of discovery was in correcting my own fallacious notions of history, of language, and of law, and especially of the spiritual, scriptural knowledge that cannot be discovered without learning the figurative and legal language it was written in. To read the kings law book one must learn the king’s “higher” language. This is what we have learned. We have attempted in every way to kill our superego by removing our respect of our strawman id-entity. Thus, the ego must die as well.

Thanks to all who have followed and stuck with me as we have broken down paradigms and utterly destroyed history. Thanks for your letters, your gifts of books and donations, and for your support in general. Equal thanks to the trolls who have had the opposite effect as they intended, which was to make me question everything and be extra careful to seek Reality over the perception of truth in fiction. And thanks to all my friends and family, both for their love and support (and patience) and for the abandonment and painful separation. I realized long ago that to be in search of the Reality of things is rare, and that seeking such Reality is the most self-offensive thing we can do. Nothing hurts more. Nothing is more offensive than the actual Truth of Reality. For we are all living our own lie in a very convincing fiction of law and society, and with religious and patriotic zeal we defend that lie to escape Reality, even to the death.

In the end, in my final shows, as I began to see more than I bargained for, as this debtor’s hell began to manifest before my eyes, my listening friends were not surprised to see me quit. They could hear it in my voice, a profound sobering and sadness, even a hopelessness manifesting in every new discovery. However, it is only through the act of destroying all hope and facing Reality head on without artifice that each of us may ever finally act upon our knowledge and stop ignoring the problems in the hopes of some superhero that will come and save the day. The return of the Savior. For even christ’s parabolic Word tells us that in the end we can only save ourselves.

And so I leave these words, these shows, as my gift to any who seek to learn from my own limited knowledge. I will continue to post to this blog, probably more often now without having a radio show every day, and I will continue to seek the solutions, not the remedies.

My next project, I have decided, in conjunction with my writings, is to make a research documentary about the history and possibility of establishing the modern version of a monastery. Since all of our land has been stolen (on paper) from under us, which is explained in detail in my work “Strawman,” our collective problem is that we have no where left to walk to. Our parents have nothing to leave us but defective, imperfect titles and debt paper. Our blood has been figuratively corrupted through our certified birth into the legal fiction, and we stand in public attainder through contract, without the ability to be lawful heirs. And so it is my belief, my passion, that we can make the idea of a religious society, a place of immunity and sanctuary from legal debauchery and pursuit of money in mammon cool again. We cannot be free without a place to be free. We cannot practice moral, natural law without a moral, natural place to do so without legal personification. And so I believe the monastery to be the answer, even as recognized by their law. For no law of man may stand in respect of True religious intent, and True religious intent means to never respect persons or flattering titles or the oaths they take.

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…”

–=–

The meaning of this is lost simply because we are not parties to this constitution as public persons in contract. We attend churches that are legal corporations, which means they are not only respected but restricted by the legal law of government. In other words, every corporation calling itself a “church” or organized “religion” is under the legal law, not over it, defeating the entire purpose of being a religious man. Each of us is the temple, and our temple is enslaved and destroyed by our participation in legal affairs through citizenship. And so we must strive to escape such respect of artifice, by standing unseen in a Pure and True religious being based on Charity and Love, without any need or participation in legal things. We must shed our strawman and stop respecting others.

FREEDOM OF RELIGION – Embraces the concept of freedom to believe and freedom to act, the first of which (belief) is absolute, but the second of which (action) remains subject to regulation for protection of society. (Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)

–=–

To put it simply, a public U.S. citizen-ship has no right to practice any moral or religious law. This is Caesar’s society, not our own. For U.S. citizenship is the abandonment of free religion and is an acceptance of the national flattering title of legalized “Christian,” as if one can be born as a follower of christ without first obtaining years of knowledge of the scriptures. A nation cannot be a follower of christ, because a nation is a damned fiction of law, and all who respect it are in damnation. And whatever is born of the nation, all citizenships, are thus nationally whatever their creator establishes them as, which in the case of a Romanized, Latinized, “Christian Nation,” is a false, artificial title of “Christian” under Caesar (district of New Columbia). The word district in law means seizure. And all things are seized under Caesar, under this modern contractual feud of public citizenship. Essentially, even the self-proclaimed “atheist” while acting in U.S. citizenship is a corporate “Christian,” no different than those pagans who partook in Caesar’s empire and sat in the colosseums watching the True, uncontrollable followers of christ be fed to the lions.

This is the whole point of religion. For religion is the one and only exemption to the secular, legal (anti-Nature, anti-God) law of man. The only way to abjure the realm (jurisdiction) is to be convicted of crime or to join a monastery! This is well documented, and is also the difference between a private and public man.

The religions of church and state stand purposefully opposed to this, as incorporated institutions of the state designed to take man away from his True religion and provide a false temple “built by hands.”

And this brings me to the precipice, to the beginning of a new journey. I hope that you will be a part of it. I hope that you will help to spread my free work when released soon so that others may discover their own disposition so well occulted by public-mindedness, public education, and public entertainment. The legal matrix cannot be seen, for it is only a coded language artfully made to appear as Reality. The strawman cannot be viewed in the mirror, for it is only a false man built of paper, of contracts and mortgages (dead pledges) in mortmain (dead hands), of credits and debits, and of legal words and flattering titles that do not exist in Nature.

—=—

“Receive my instruction, and not silver;
and knowledge rather than choice gold.

For wisdom is better than rubies;
and all the things that may be desired
are not to be compared to it.”

—Proverbs 8: 10-11, KJB

—=—

All that I have gained I am now ready to render back to Caesar, for all I have acquired has always been the property of Caesar’s public persona, the strawman I have possessed like a demon since its birth, the puppet I breathe life into, the ship I sail on the sea of commerce. No possession, no trinket, no dwelling place, and no paper title is worth debt slavery in seizure (Caesar). I am ready to give up everything in fiction so as to embrace the Reality of Nature and Its Highest, self-evident Law. And so after years of debilitating hope and much talk I am ready to act, to find my way and to walk the spiritual path.

Perhaps we shall meet along the way.

Or perhaps we may build our dreams and find Reality again together.

Till then, there is an unlimited wealth of knowledge in this internet, even as traditional books and libraries are being figuratively burned and ignored. Deciphering that knowledge between so much bullshit is the ultimate challenge. And learning the language that enslaves us is the greatest task of all, which is the purpose of my upcoming works. When every word we speak has an opposing (legal) meaning in the jurisdiction (fictional realm) of  the church and state, we can attain only false enlightenment. We cannot read the scriptures in common English, for it is purposefully designed to be the language of illiteracy, the public language of the multitude of goyim. The priest-class never gave us the tool to decipher the Bible because they reserved the Latin meanings of their words for themselves. And our laws are written in the same, “higher” language of that spell-craft. And so a master and professor of the English language is at best a complete idiot, so in love with the meanings of the lowest, vulgar form of words that all sense of Reality is gone, as the word becomes more important than the Nature of Reality so named. And we teach each new generation in the same vulgarity, keeping the human capital management system intact through sheer nightmarish ignorance of language.

My work is designed to teach that “higher” language as they who created it have labeled it, not to use it as they do to induce harm but to defeat it utterly by recognizing its purpose. For it can only be used as a lie, as all things legal or “higher” are a lie.

But I digress…

I cannot place thousands of pages and definitions into one simple blog post. I hope that you will find enlightenment in my upcoming works.

Thank you again to all who have joined me on this journey.

And remember that everything in the legal realm is artificial, including your self. This is the key to knowledge.

–=–

“For all the gods of the nations are idols…”

—Psalms 96:5, KJB

–=–

.

–Clint Richardson (Realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Friday, January 8th, 2016

STRAWMAN: The Real Story Of Your Artificial Person


Apologies for my absence lately in the blogosphere, and for those comments I have not read and managed yet. I am also catching up on emails and wish to thank everyone who has made donations to keep me alive, researching, writing, and hosting the daily radio show (Mon-Fri, 7pm Eastern, on republicbroadcasting.org).

That being said, I’d like to introduce my new website and that which has been taking most of my attention these days:

http://www.strawmanstory.info/

I’ve been writing this work in book-form for several years off and on, building it bit by bit, until this year when I made it my full-time project. As I have been researching and writing I am continuously learning while pouring over legal dictionaries, U.S. Code, international law, etymology sources, scripture, concordances, and other sources of ancient and hidden knowledge, from Plato to Bastiat. This fact has not and certainly will not change.

There is a point in which a researcher must bravely and with uncertain confidence finalize his writings into a utilizable form, though when this point is supposed to happen is beyond my own comprehension. For I wish not to be bound by my own misunderstandings and set-in-word errors in logic and rhetoric due to so much faulty grammar out there, as so many (most) authors certainly have. Perhaps this notion of perfection is as much an impossibility as the idea of attaining all knowledge is. Only time will tell…

Of this work I can only say one thing… that it has never been attempted before. It is being compiled so as to teach a new language, the legal language, to those who seek to comprehend that which enslaves them. The magic of words is the invisible web that entraps and enjoins us to a legal matrix of fictional things. But we are not shown or taught this authoritative, “higher” language in which true knowledge has been hidden. Instead, we are taught the common words of illiteracy. This is called public education. And it keeps us public, stealing all privacy.

One cannot simply pick up a Bible, for instance, and read it in the common tongue. It’s meaning will remain a mystery even while its Law remains highest. The common words are often quite opposite in meaning from their legal counterparts, though they appear to be the same. But the symptom of this disease causes the victims of this “vulgar” form of common communication to remain subject not only to man, but specifically to man’s creation of language terms of art. For the word common also means “goyim.”

The illusion is steadily shattered with every word uncovered, with every maxim revealed, with every Bible verse clarified, and with every lie demystified.

For the reader and as disclaimer, there will be no turning back. No more turning away from reality. No more living in ignorance. No more convenient lies. No more shirking of responsibility by blaming a fictional persona. And therefore no more legal excuses.

What is legal is not what is right.

This work will be offered in (non-commercial) book form in exchange for gifts in private donation and barter. I will be offering it in advance soon as well so that I can raise the funds to have it created (printed) in that “book” format. But it will always be offered for free as well, for no one should be without the knowledge of their own enslavement. A (.pdf) will be available to anyone unable or unwilling to offer trade or gift. The only difference between these two formats will be that the physical book-form will be indexed. At over 1,000 pages, this will be a reference book as much as anything.

Yes, 1,000+ pages… If there is one thing I have learned for certain in my many years of laboring for knowledge, it is that nothing worth learning or doing is easy. The path is narrow, and only a few will walk it. This work is designed to help light that path.

The website is temporary for now, and will be updated in the next few months as I begin to organize my tome of notes and research into a final collection. Again, thanks to those who have supported me with love and kindness, and the ability to continue this work.

If you’d like to hear what’s been happening in “The Corporation Nation” radio show, you can check out any of my 375+ shows from the last 20 months for free here:

https://corporationnationradioarchives.wordpress.com/

(Note: Search tool at bottom of page, looks like a magnifying glass)

I hope to have the “book” finished in the next few months, and I’ll set up a unique email for that purpose. I will rely on merely word of mouth and radio promotion, so please help to spread the word and share freely. Just remember I can only continue this effort with your support.

Be well…

.

Clint Richardson (Realitybloger.wordpress.com)
Wednesday, June 3rd, 2015

I Am Not The People, And Neither Are You


It is the greatest of fallacies; indeed it might be the greatest public relations stunt ever conceived. It cannot be defined. It cannot be touched or spoken to. It cannot be seen. It has no substance.

And yet we as individuals identify ourselves as it with perfectly unhindered irrationality, while at the same time never being able to grasp its totality of non-existence. It is used to describe every last one of us, even when it singles out one of us to bully and plunder. It represents the basis of the entire structure of power over us, while at the same time somehow being us. And the power of it has created the most impressive false dialectic ever conceived in the history of the world.

Monarchies and dictatorships are surely envious of it, for even the most violent of militarized tyrannies cannot match the shear driving force of the consent of it. And all who oppose it have learned that no power in the world, including an act of God, seems to be able to stop it.

So just what is it?

It is the ambiguous title of “the People.”

In its most surreal application, the People is most often used to cause a lack of tangible responsibility for the actions of the People. Like the Dr. Jeckyl and Mr. Hyde model, the men and women that make up the citizenry of government can simply blame the government for everything done in the People’s name, even though it was supposedly done with the consent of the governed. For the government, the men and women that make up that legislature and Executive branch can simply blame the citizenry for giving their consent as the governed People, never admitting that their own actions (which are often despite the actual People’s will) were anything but the will of the People.

Either way, it seems, no one is ever to blame for the actions of the People because the People simply does not exist.

Does the People cast a shadow? Can the People be touched or seen? Can the People actually only speak with one voice, considering it supposedly equates to all the citizens in the nation? Can the elected officials somehow be the People despite the rest of the People just because those People voted for the legislators to be the voice of the People?

Just who, in the end, do you suppose is taking responsibility as the actual People? Is it the president? Is he the People when He decides to act as the People without actually consulting the People? Is the entire citizenry of People thus responsible as a collective People for the actions of the president acting as the People?

–=–
The People vs. The People
–=–

I can just imagine it… where all parties claiming to be the People actually go into arbitration so as to decide just who is in actuality responsible for the actions of government. It would be more devious than a divorce case, more televised than the O.J. Simpson case, and more flippant than a cat in a hot tub.

The common People would claim that the government committed a crime. The government would then counter-claim that the People voted for government, and therefore the crime was in the name of the People. But, so argues the attorney for the voting People, government is acting without consulting the People in its actions. To which government’s Attorney General retorts that the People gave consent for the government to act as the People in all things political, which really means that government is the spirit of the People. Nay, nay, says the common People’s representative, for the People have voiced in private and have called and sent petitions to these re-presentations of the People in government and spoken their individual opinions of government’s actions, and a majority of the People do not approve of government’s actions while acting as the People. And still in stalemate defiance, the government would claim that while the People certainly have the right to individually voice their personal opinions under the doctrine of “free speech”, says the Attorney General for the United States (i.e. the People), the People (government) is certainly not required in any way to consider the People’s (any citizen’s) individual opinions on the actions of government (the People)…

And at this point, Judge Judy slams her gavel down in Talmudic entropy and declares a mistrial due to irreconcilable differences in sameness.

And when the opinions of the case are written into case law, it would read that no distinction could be established in either separating the government from the People or the People from government, and that no individual citizen could claim to be the People, for all the People cannot be manifest in just one common person. Finally, it is the courts opinion that no individual or group of persons can claim to be the actual full body of People, because the People is a plural title for a singular body politic called the People. Therefore, only government can call itself the People, despite the fact that government is merely a fiction of law with no substance, and so the People cannot in fact sue the government for the government is in fact and in title actually the People.

Final decision: the case cannot exist because the People cannot sue the People. The government cannot sue itself. The People, therefore, must submit to the will of the People.

Here exists the hand of the People,
claiming to exist despite its non-existence,
presenting its own representation.

–=–
Say What?
–=–

If the above is confusing for you, ask yourself a few questions….

Are you a People? Is there any way that the word People can be a singular term that refers to only one man or woman?

Is government a People? Inasmuch as Walmart is a corporation, and the entire staff, board, CEO, shareholders, and owners could loosely be called a People, then yes.

Is government the People? How can government be all of us People if we are not voting for the actions or laws created by the small group of People in government?

Sure, we vote for which persons will inhabit government, but those People never ask permission from the rest of the People who voted for them when they pass laws on the People’s behalf. But if the government (the People) is able to put the responsibility of its actions on the entirety of all the People, then is it any wonder that the People never punish the People in government for crimes against the People?

Trying to figure out just what the People is at this point is like looking at an infinite, self-similar fractal. The beginning and the ending of just what the People is can never be truly be ascertained. And just when you think you have it figured out, you realize the paradox that its true quantitative power is that it is an equation with no solution – an impossible perfection of the political corruption of natural reason and logic.

 

Don’t get lost

–=–

How can such a nonsensical word as the People have been foisted upon the masses of men, who self-identify as both an individual sentient being and a fictional plural construct? How can hundreds of millions of men be convinced that they are not men but legally a single hive-minded political term known as the People? And from that experiential belief, how were so many strong-willed men able to be convinced that We, the People is the creator of all things and all laws, and that even though they are supposedly one of the People, the People can somehow single one of the individual People out and sue, fine, tax, punish, imprison, and even put to death that individual all in the name of that great god called We, the People? Amazingly, even as individual sentient beings, we still consider and address ourselves not as our selves, but as the whole People. I am We. We am I.

And therein lies the greatest word magic and trickery ever spell-cast. For by saying I am We, the People, a man is really saying I am of government. I am a fictional representation of myself. I am an individual fictional person and one of the fictional People at the same time? I am not man. I have no voice. I am totally controllable. I am a creation of government

Literally, my will is the People’s will, and so therefore the People’s will tells me my will, whether I like it or not, and whether the People them-selves like it or not. Cause there are no real People, just a bunch of subjects called persons. It’s all just a fiction. Just a name. A big lie.

–=–
Maxim’s Of Law:
–=–

“The creator controls.”

“A thing similar is not exactly the same.”

“One who wills a thing to be or to be done cannot complain of that thing as an injury.”

“He who consents cannot receive an injury.”

“Consent removes or obviates a mistake.”

“The agreement of the parties overcomes or prevails against the law.”

“Agreement takes the place of the law: the express understanding of parties supercedes such understanding as the law would imply.”

“No one can sue in the name of another.”

“It is immaterial whether a man gives his assent by words or by acts and deeds.”

“A fiction is a rule of law that assumes something which is or may be false as true.”

“Where truth is, fiction of law does not exist.”

“Whoever does anything by the command of a judge (magistrate/We, the People as god) is not reckoned to have done it with an evil intent, because it is necessary to obey.”

“Where a person does an act by command of one exercising judicial (magistrative) authority, the law will not suppose that he acted from any wrongful or improper motive, because it was his bounded duty to obey.”

 –=–

Why can’t anyone get in trouble by the law for crimes against humanity? Because People aren’t men! A man acting in person as one of the People has the permission of the People to do what the People tell the person to do on behalf of the People. In other words, if the People are sovereign, and a sovereign knows no law above it, then the People have no real law when acting as the sovereign We, the People, and pretend to operate their crimes under the law of the People! This is the simulacra and simulation of the People and of government. The People is a copy with no (living) original. The government is similar to the law but not the law; a simulation of God. This is the fractal reality of a great and powerful lie, the underlying law being truly that of anything goes.

Who, what, where, when, and how is the People?
Will the real People please stand up?

–=–

People is a fiction of law. The law, however, assumes that the fiction (People) is non-fiction (Mankind), and that therefore the fiction is true in the eyes of the law. The law says that all of mankind are a single People. Man acting as persons of the People (government) are acting in another name (in the name of the People), and so man acting in the name of or as the People can certainly not sue the government, for the government is the People, and the People cannot sue the People itself, and so this makes somehow a functional paradox we call justice.

The People cannot really complain to government, which claims to be doing the will of the People, because again the People cannot complain about the People. They are the same thing. One single body politic. On individual thing. E pluibus unum. One world order is merely a one world People of the same world government (the People). Individual nations are called “state’s” of the United Nations, and the member nations will just be the new People of the One World Nation. For ultimately, in a global government, the People that is the United States will only be considered one individual person in the United Nations.

Now don’t be confused, for it is easy to fall into the fractal trap of this word porn. A diehard “We, the People” person that just can’t imagine not being regarded as a plural and thus actually be responsible for his own actions despite the People he identifies himself as, and therefore as a real non-dependent man, is no longer able to blame government or his mistaken identity he calls the People for his or her own inaction; somehow blaming all other People as opposed to himself while simultaneously believing that he is indeed one of the People which he himself blames. Damn People!

Whoa there!

Seriously, before the fractal gets way out of hand (Mandelbrot would be so proud), let’s make sure that this whole diatribe isn’t just some modern abstract from a fractal crack-head’s dream…

Let’s see what this word People means in the legal books:

PEOPLE, noun [Latin populus.]1. The body of persons who compose a community, town, city or nation. We say, the people of a town; the people of London or Paris; the English people. In this sense, the word is not used in the plural, but it comprehends all classes of inhabitants, considered as a collective body, or any portion of the inhabitants of a city or country. 2. The vulgar; the mass of illiterate persons. The knowing artist may judge better than the people 3. The commonalty, as distinct from men of rank. Myself shall mount the rostrum in his favor, And strive to gain his pardon from the people 4. Persons of a particular class; a part of a nation or community; as country people 5. Persons in general; any persons indefinitely; like on in French, and man in Saxon. 6. A collection or community of animals. The ants are a people not strong, yet they prepare their meat in the summer. Proverbs 30:25. 7. When people signified a separate nation or tribe, it has the plural number. Thou must prophesy again before many peoples. Revelation 10:11. 8. In Scripture, fathers or kindred. Genesis 25:8. 9. The Gentiles. –To him shall the gathering of the people be. Genesis 49:10. – verb transitive  – To stock with inhabitants. Emigrants from Europe have peopled the United States. (–Webster’s 1828)

PEOPLEA state; as the people of the state of New York. A nation in its collective and political capacityThe aggregate or mass of the individuals who constitute the state… In a more restricted sense, and as generally used in constitutional law, the entire body of those citizens of a state or nation who are invested with political power for political purposes, that is, the qualified voters or electors… In neutrality laws, a government recognized by the United States. The word “people” may have various signification according to the connection in which it is used. When we speak of the rights of the people, or of the government of the people by law, or of the people as a non-political aggregate, we mean all the inhabitants of the state or nation, without distinction an to sex, age, or otherwise. But when reference is made to the people as the repository of sovereignty, or as the source of governmental power, or to popular government, we are in fact speaking of that select and limited class of citizens to whom the constitution accords the elective franchise and the right of participation in the offices of government. (–Black’s 4rth Edition)

PEOPLE – Ordinarily, the entire body of the inhabitants of a State. In a political sense, that portion of the inhabitants who are intrusted with political power; the qualified voters. The words “the people” must be determined by the connection. In some cases they refer to the qualified voters, in others to the state in its sovereign capacity. The United States government proceeds directly, from the people; is “ordained and established” in the name of the people. It is emphatically and truly a government of the people. In form and substance it emanates from them. Its powers are granted by them, and are to be exercised directly on them, and for their benefit.” Under our system, the “people,” who in England are called “subjects,” constitute the sovereign. The simple word “people”  is sometimes applied to a nation or foreign power. When the constitution of a State directs that processes shall run in the name of the State, a process in the name of the “people” will be held deficient, notwithstanding the form be statutory.” See Citizen; Country; Government; Lex, Salus, etc.; Magistrate; Nation; Sovereignty; State, Welfare. (–W.C. Anderson 1889)

–=–

Ever wonder why a petition never seems to work? That’s because a petition is not created by all the People, but only by some persons. Persons are not the People. In other words, a petition may be considered as legal evidence, but not as the will of the People. The People is a legal concept that the People can’t seem to access, though We are supposedly the People.

PETITION – A written address, embodying an application or prayer from the person or persons preferring it, to the power, body, or person to whom it is presented, for the exercise of his or their authority in the redress of some wrong, or the grant of some favor, privilege, or license.

PRAYERThe request contained in a bill in equity that the court will grant the process, aid, or relief which the complainant desires. Also, by extension, the term is applied to that part of the bill which contains this request.

PRAYER – chancery pleadings. That part of a bill which asks for relief. 2. The skill of the solicitor is to be exercised in framing this part of the bill. An accurate specification of the matters to be decreed in complicated cases, requires great discernment and experience; it is varied as the case is made out, concluding always with a prayer of general relief, at the discretion of the court.

–=–

We pray to the court, because the court is the god, an other word for magistrate, which is another word for government as the People. The court represents We, the People against us, either wholly or as individuals or corporations. We as individuals or groups, associations, or corporations are never addressing the court as the People, it is the Court that is addressing us as the People, because government is the People. It is impossible for the People to sue the court because the court is the People. The court offers the opinion of the People. All we can do is pray to that magi-god in a black robe for remedy. The word prayer has been modernly re-named into “pleading.” The People need not plead, for the court is the People.

–=–
The Chicken Or The Egg?
–=–

I’m not sure how many other ways I can say this, but it should be clear that I, you, we, and us is not the People. It’s a physical impossibility, which is part of the strategy of control. The government knows that the People can never be together in one room, acting as its true self – all the millions of actual voters. It’s a gloriously impossible feat. And that’s why the legal god that has been named the We, the People as a representation of the People is so powerful and seemingly immutable.

The only last fallacy to be consumed in the fire of this fractal debtor’s hell is to dispel the notion that the People created the government. Here again, the romantic patriotic view is that the People all voted for the constitution. Of course this is a verifiable untruth. Very few of the People could vote, because they weren’t good enough to vote due to blood, status, lack of land-holdings, and of course color. The People who created the constitution were clear on this 3/5ths of a point, which makes it humorous to see a patriotic “negro” man eager to wave the flag.

While it is accurate to say that the group of Free-masonic men who signed the constitution were certainly a specific, proper noun group of People, it is not accurate to say that they were all the People of the entire nation, any more than it is accurate to say that the legislature actually represents the will of every person in the United States as the People. It is more accurate to say that the individual states as body politics’ were the things that made up the People, and not the men within acting as citizens, slaves, and voluntary or involuntary servants. The People, as defined above, are the states of the nation and therefore is the nation itself. That’s not real People, that’s just an incorporated thing. An idol. A god.

How could there have been a People if there was no nation? Was there a specific day that all men became the People? They certainly weren’t natural born at the time they became the People. Could the People of a nation exist before the nation was created? Obviously, if none of us out here can represent the People in court, then we are not really the People.

If government disappeared tomorrow, there would be no place for the People to legally appear as a legal body. For the People only exist as and in a fictional jurisdiction. Government creates and becomes the People, and the creator controls.

And so I end this puzzling commentary with one last question…

When are you going to quit denying the beauty and wonder of your uniqueness and individuality, quit denying your personal responsibility, and quit letting evil men commit atrocious crimes against all the men and creatures of the Earth in your name – in the name of the god of We, the People?

.

–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Thursday, January 15th, 2015

Cracking The Legal Code Of King James


The average Christian in this world has been sold on the idea that they can buy their way into heaven, through the middle-man salesmen priest of their perspective church and its particular doctrine, as if this will somehow wash away their sins just like the three credit rating agencies can magically wipe away a bad credit score.

If I were a man on the street and I made the claim that for $100 dollars I could save your soul by somehow bypassing God Himself and His wrathful judgement, I’d be locked up in the nearest asylum (run by nuns) and charged with conspiracy to defraud the public. But if I incorporate and call myself a 501(c)3 religion, suddenly that same sales pitch becomes authorized by law and fervently protected by government… all 40,000 of them!

But did anyone ever do their due diligence and check the Bible to see if this was actually what’s supposed to happen?

Does the definition of what a Christian is and which path he or she is supposed to walk have anything to do with a corporate religion, a religious doctrine, a constitution of legal de facto government, or even a church? Can a man buy love, purchase forgiveness, tithe for his sins with the money of Caesar (government), and then step up to knock-knock-knock on Heaven’s door in forgiveness of these Biblical no-no’s? Can a church give men license to sin in exchange for the payment of blessings from priests in ceremonial robes?

Surprisingly, the answers to all of these questions within the Bible are both shocking and beautiful… And they all begin with the words absolutely not! The Bible does not say these things, and it does not bestow status on men to act in God’s or Jesus Christ’s name as a vicar (replacement) – which is surprisingly the claimed basis of all legal authority in religion and government (church and state).

But the church and state sure wants you to think it does…

Words like saved, salvation, and redemption are part of an alternative language not taught to most church-going folks, for these are the words of attorneys and lawyers – the language of secret societies and Orders that seek power and control through govern-ment (mind control) of the masses, so that we may never be free from the self-imposed debt that can only be forgiven through the comprehension of the Bible and its legal interpretation.

The first time I even began to contemplate the power of the Bible was when a friend entered the whole Bible as evidence of his clients personal credo of law into a federal court… and it was accepted and honored without question!

Then, some time later, I was approached by a man who tried to convince me to do what he was doing, which was to copy what the wealthy in-the-know business elite do. He explained that the registrar loved it when the elitist few brought in the King James “authorized” 1611 Bible and claimed it as law, utilizing it in the creation of a trust to turn the artificial person (strawman) attached as the surname into a not-for-profit corporation, where the new “trust” controlled the name, and then proceeded to show me all of the IRS tax forms that these society men utilized to get all of their tax dollars back in “redemption” at the end of each year. All of this was based on entering the legally “authorized” Bible as evidence of law. And while at first I was intrigued, I quickly realized this road was not for me, and that it was steeped in comprehensible participation of the  fraud of the system. I chose not to benefit from this organized corruption. And the secretive gent has never contacted me again, asking me not to share what he told me.

I later learned that the word trust, as do many words in the legal language, means the opposite of its vernacular (common) usage. It goes something like this:

—> A trust Maxim of law: when someone is in possession of something which they do not have a legal right to, then they are the “trustee” of that thing.

Needless to say, this made me want to learn more about this Bible and how it was being used in law! And this began a journey of discovery and actualization that I never thought I’d take. I started reading the Bible and cross-referencing the words with the legal language of the law society. And what I found was an exact match!

Before we can understand how to use the language of the Bible as a remedy in law, we must first define legally the words of that Sacred Book so as to comprehend the legal process hidden within. For they are of the same language. Only then can we be successful in the utilization of the Bible as a legal remedy within the legal language of the law society to escape the laws of man and mammon. In truth, anyone who has read the Bible will need to reread it once they learn this dualistic legal code, which naturally is the code of church and state.

It is ironic, really, that the powers that be (church and state) have divided these two languages of man’s legal law and the Bible. To create this division in the understanding of men through this separation of the togetherness of church and state, which both claim the same authority to rule men under God’s name under oath (defined as taking God’s name in vain), the separation of the temporal and the spiritual had to be accomplished. I now understand that this was an important step in conquering the minds of men within the powerful G20 (Gentile 20) nations. We must understand that there is no true redemption for mankind in the temporal (nonspiritual) legal law alone, for the law of men only deals with strawmen – artificial persons as corporations that are created as fictions of law and owned through letters patent by government, where the spirituality of the soul is rejected as being encased within the vessel (legal body of man). Thus a living spiritually inclined man will never find true remedy in legal law alone while acting as a legal fictional person under man’s laws, and certainly not in the constitution that created that legal fiction. For God’s laws and nature itself have no place in fiction except in name (noun) only.

On the other hand there is the Bible, to which the priests in their own religious societies never reveal the true legal language of that sacred Tome. So it is equally accurate to say that no fictional “person” or citizen of a soulless State will ever find remedy within the Bible, for the Bible is for the sentient and stateless mankind alone, and persons are mere legal fictions of mankind (secular government) that are not to be respected according to the Bible. Thus a citizen (person; an enfranchised man) will never be able to utilize the Bible as remedy, for persons (names) have no essence or “soul”, and are not found in nature (where the Bible exclaims is the natural law of God). Persons are creations of law (of man’s law), not God. And yet the priest-class continuously bombard their parishioners with fallacy confiding patriotism through God’s will for legal law issued by government (man) as “the law of the land”, when in fact all the Earth and land is under the law of God and nature – as God’s creation not man’s.

But the bridge between the linguistic code written in the Bible and what is written in the legal code is never crossed while “educating” the masses. Church and State are indeed one, and cannot be separated, for the authority of all law is based on God’s authority seeded to men. Indeed, if this relationship were ever discovered, all good men would turn away from fiction and choose to be free under God’s law and no longer be enslaved by man’s legal fiction, exactly as the Bible instructs us to escape. And no slaves would be left to run the machine of mammon (money).

I am well on my way to cracking this Code, and so I want to share with you what I’ve uncovered so far. Whatever your opinion or beliefs about religion and the Bible are, they do not apply here. I’m not interested in proving the existence of anything but what exists in nature that can be proven. The nature of God or lack thereof is for you to decide individually, and has absolutely no relevance within this discussion. The words we will be defining here are straight out of the Bible AND the legal dictionaries of government. When you comprehend that these things are one in the same, and that the Bible is the hidden authority of the laws of the men in government and religion, you will have your own revelation that I cannot imagine one to be able to put into words.

The word abandon, for instance, may be defined as two seemingly opposite concepts. Abandon on one hand means totally free and unhindered expression of will, while in the same definition it may also mean to leave something behind. But for our purposes, we must certainly combine these definitions in our comprehension that in order to be free and unhindered in our lives as free men (in abandon) under God (under the laws of nature), we must also abandon and leave behind permanently the ties that bind us in chains of debt and obligation to government (mammon). In other words, we must abandon our person so as to 100% of the time act as living beings (in abandon). A man that carries a commercial entity in the form of an artificial person in commerce with government (mammon) in truth carries around a “demon”, and therefore cannot live life in abandon.

Webster’s 1828 dictionary defines the word demon as:

“signifying an evil spirit or genius, which influences the conduct or directs the fortunes of mankind“.

And just what exactly is an evil “genius”?

Genius – n. [Latin from the root of gigno; Gr. to beget.] 1. Among the ancients, a good or evil spirit or demon supposed to preside over a man’s destiny in life, that is, to direct his birth and actions and be his guard and guide; a tutelary deity; the ruling and protecting power of men, places or things. This seems to be merely a personification or deification of the particular structure or bent of mind which a man receives from nature, which is the primary signification of the word. 2. The peculiar structure of mind which is given by nature to an individual, or that disposition or bent of mind which is peculiar to every man, and which qualifies him for a particular employment; a particular natural talent or aptitude of mind for a particular study or course of life; as a genius for history, for poetry or painting. 3. Strength of mind; uncommon powers of intellect, particularly the power of invention. In this sense we say, Homer was a man of genius. Hence, 4. A man endowed with uncommon vigor of mind; a man of superior intellectual faculties. Shakespeare was a rare-genius. (Webster’s 1828)

An evil genius (demon) might be one who, let’s say, creates a doctrine of “Christian” religion that goes completely against the teachings of the character of Jesus Christ, incorporates that doctrine into a corporate church, and then deceives all the followers of that religion that its word is not only of and inspired by God, but that his genius is the only true interpretation of the will of God as God’s spokesman and author. And thus one of a thousand religions is born, completely hiding the fact that religion, ceremony, symbols, and mammon is forbidden in the Bible for true followers of the legal and spiritual story of Jesus Christ and its guidance to be free from the influences and enslavement of the church and state.

And rest assured here that a demon (genius) needs no wings, horns, or claws as depicted in ancient artifacts. These are just frightening imagery to scare children and adults into never perceiving that ordinary men like themselves could be so evil and demonic in their genius. They live among us, controlling us, feeding off of our collective ignorance, harvesting our wealth and happiness… and they are just as human as you and me. They are as we are, simply of Adam.

ADAM – n. In Heb., Man; primarily, the name of the human species, mankind; appropriately, the first Man, the progenitor of the human race. The word signifies form, shape, or suitable form, hence, species. It is evidently connected with Heb., to be like or equal, to form an image, to assimilate. Whence the sense of likeness, image, form, shape; a body, like. [See Man.] (Webster’s 1828)

As we can read here and within the bible concordances, the word Adam is plural. It is representative of all mankind as a species. But more importantly, it represents within the Bible the “status” of mankind before being enslaved by diminishing legal statuses (names) such as “person”, “citizen”, “American”, “debtor”, or “slave”.

Yet, what does your priest sell to you every Sunday, hoping you never learn the true language of the Bible of the State of the Kings? That Adam should be anthropomorphized as a single man?

I do not claim to be a genius, and would avoid any demon that claims such notion for him or herself. For that is just a false title not of nature. I have no religion to sell, and I want none of your money or your pledged oath in exchange for this sharing of work. I give it freely in the hopes of breaking away the supposed mysteries of the Bible and revealing what it truly is to be free and to live in peace among all men under its teachings. For all men must know these words or be permanently stuck in their already existing bondage to the religion of church and State.

Ultimately, church and state are the same thing, where nowadays one is incorporated within the other, laughably calling themselves non-profits.

Perhaps non-prophets would be more like it…

In short, I want to help you to save you from your fictional self. I want you to stop taking part in your own demonic possession of an artificial person. Remember the popular axiom that possession is 9/10’s of the law? Well, this really means that the law is worthless unless you possess and appear by name as the person belonging to government – the legal fiction that the government’s fictional laws only apply to. You see, the laws of men do not apply to you, unless you claim and possess man’s fictional demon (citizen) as your person! Nine-tenth’s of man’s law, in other words, is only applicable to the government’s own property – the artificial person you possess called a citizen – creating a contractual obligation to follow the laws of man’s government over God’s. The laws of government (Satan) govern only persons (demons), not living men.

Not dis-similarly, the rules and regulations of Walmart employees only regulate the demon person created as and called the “employee” – another artificial status of person-hood. No man is bound by the rules of any corporation unless they are employed by that corporation, including all of the municipalities and offices of government (the corporation nation). If you are employed, you are possessing an additional legal fictional status added to a person called an “employee”.

POSSESSION – n. The having, holding or detention of property in one’s power or command; actual seizing or occupancy, either rightful or wrongful. One man may have the possession of a thing, and another may have the right of possession or property. In bailment, the bailee, who receives goods to convey, or to keep for a time, has the possession of the goods, and a temporary right over them, but not the property. Property in possession includes both the right and the occupation. 2. Any thing valuable possessed or enjoyed. Christian peace of mind is the best possession of life. 3. The state of being under the power of demons or invisible beings; madness; lunacy; as demoniacal possession To take possession to enter on, or to bring within one’s power or occupancy. To give possession to put in another’s power or occupancy. (Webster’s 1828)

EMPLOYMENT – n. The act of employing or using. 1. Occupation; business; that which engages the head or hands; as agricultural employments; mechanical employments. Men, whose employment is to make sport and amusement for others, are always despised. 2. Office; public business or trust; agency or service for another or for the public. The secretary of the treasury has a laborious and responsible employment. He is in the employment of government. (Webster’s 1828)

To be employed is to be in service as a debtor and taxpayer to government. It is to be employed through mammon, using the invisible being described above as a demon that the man possess in person (in name) and is employed (used) under the power of that demonic possession. The person employed is a material possession of government…

EMPLOYv.t. [Latin plico.] 1. To occupy the time, attention and labor of; to keep busy, or at work; to use… A portion of time should be daily employed in reading the scriptures, meditation and prayer; a great portion of life is employed to little profit or to very bad purposes. 2. To use as an instrument or means. We employ pens in writing, and arithmetic in keeping accounts. We employ medicines in curing diseases. 3. To use as materials in forming any thing. We employ timber, stones or bricks, in building; we employ wool, linen and cotton, in making cloth. 4. To engage in one’s service; to use as an agent or substitute in transacting business…  5. To occupy; to use; to apply or devote to an object; to pass in business; as, to employ time; to employ an hour, a day or a week; to employ one’s life. To employ one’s self, is to apply or devote one’s time and attention; to busy one’s self. n. That which engages the mind, or occupies the time and labor of a person; business; object of study or industry; employment. 1. Occupation, as art, mystery, trade, profession. 2. Public office; agency; service for another. (Webster’s 1828)

ENGAGE – v.t.  1. To make liable for a debt to a creditor; to bind one’s self as surety. 2. To pawn; to stake as a pledge. 3. To enlist; to bring into a party; as, to engage men for service; to engage friends to aid in a cause. 6. To unite and bind by contract or promise. Nations engage themselves to each other by treaty. 8. To occupy; to employ assiduously. (Webster’s 1828)

As a citizen, you are employing (using) and occupying in trust the person owned by government, and are therefore agreeing to its rules (codes).

When the concept of the Mark of the Beast is considered, we must realize that it has become increasingly difficult to find “employment” without the mark of the government name, which is representative of the Social Security NUMBER of the government beast. Thus, buying and selling (commerce) are also regulated by the beast, requiring the name and number. So will you be used (employed) simply to bow down to the beast?

In a corporation, your person is the tool being employed (used) for your actual time and labor as a man (connected as surety to the person). Thus you are a human tool no less artificial (soulless; non-sentient) than a pen or a brick being used in business. A slave has no God-given (inherent) rights, not even a paid one. For an employee is always a person not a man, and a person has no unalienable rights. A corporation hires the demon (surname of the person), and you work to satisfy the obligation of the demon in contractual “employment”.

So what is your “occupation”?

If your answer is a licensed doctor, attorney, or an unlicensed busboy or garbageman, or any other one of a million legal taxpaying “occupations”, then you are using a legal title (status) of government regulated under a person with the status of “employee” of government while under its tax code, receiving a pension from government via your tax contributions to Social Security. This investment in insurance and the future receivership of benefits from that Social Security trust binds you to the federal income tax as a beneficiary of that insurance trust and its future benefit payments. That’s why they say that the income tax is voluntary, because you volunteer just by being and possessing an employed citizen instead of your self, and government’s property (the person/employee) is obligated in that debt with you as surety.

This is the price of being possessed. The demon (person) brings the man out of nature and into government’s hell on Earth.

And what is hell, really?

Are we to take the Bible literally in its allegory of a dystopian underworld where fire and brimstone burns sinners for the rest of time after they depart the Earth in physical form?

Of course not. The body remains, so what’s left to burn? The fable of hell is simply the allegory of the unnatural (legally dead) state of being a debtor, as all persons (citizens) of government are. The United States is an open air prison for debtors, and all citizens are in-deed legally classified as debtors. Sure, you must be considered legally dead to go to hell, but hell is not referencing the after-life.

You are born alive, a pure and innocent child of God, and are then immediately delivered into hell by your birth certificate – your registration as a visitor to hell on Earth – thus creating your artificial status here as a person/citizen. We are still alive within the hell on this Earth, and our possession in artificial person-hood makes us a citizen of hell. Afterlife is just a clever allegory for being set free from a life lived while imitating a fictional person, and doing so as a debtor in hell.

Hell – The name given to a place under the exchequer chamber, where the king’s debtors were confined. Rich. Diet. (Black’s 4rth Edition) (Balentines)

Hell was a dungeon for those who did not pay their debts to the government (kingdom). Today, to be under the U.S. constitution (a debt compact), as a “constitutor” (debtor), simply means to be a debtor under contractual obligation. Since all citizens are debtors, the jurisdiction of the United States in its entirety is really just one giant open-air debtors prison. In other words, Hell.

Why do I claim this to be so?

It’s simple if you understand the nature of the U.S. dollar, which is nothing more or less than “a promise to pay a debt”.

Do you actually believe that you can pay a debt with another debt (promise to pay)? If no debt can ever be paid, because there is no lawful money in existence within the debtor nation, then how can a citizen/person ever be anything else but a debtor that can never pay his or her debt?

Our particular version of a “living hell” as debtors (persons) is that hell is indeed eternal as long as we accept citizenship and are possessed of such fictional obligations (like the national debt). There is no escaping hell as long as we consent to respecting persons of any kind, including government, church, and all other corporations of any function. These are all “persons”. Our eternity on this Earth will last until we die from an accidental or natural death – a death of the flesh and blood. But these artificial persons are all created as dead financial instruments (debtors), and government remedies can only be of comfort to the dead. Government can only summon the dead (person) to court with a legal fiction summons. The hell of indebtedness is perpetual and eternal for all persons, and we cannot escape hell because there is no actual remedy or way to ever pay your national debt, since the money is already debt-based.

To have “eternal life”, as the allegory of the Bible tells us over and over, we cannot respect persons (we cannot admit of being debtors). We must always remain living men in and of nature with unalienable rights under God. We must not contract with the synagogue of Satan (man as adversary to God) to go under the Devil’s (man’s) law. This guarantees us eternal “life” on Earth, not in some incomprehensible after-life. You might call this hidden utopia a “Heaven on Earth”. Again, this is simply allegory for not accepting contracts as dead pledges and other legal personifications of our living souls into fiction characters in Satan’s (man as adversary to God) plan.

Some may think this amounts to mere anarchy, or a life without government, the meaning of that word. Most can’t imagine that instead this amounts to mere Christianity – the following of the teachings of the character Jesus Christ in self-government. But then most have thrown out the Bible without reading it with contemplation, or have read it without understanding its legal language.

“You who are on the road must have a code that you can live by… Teach your children well; their father’s hell will surely go by.” –CSNY lyrics.

To have and to hold heaven on Earth, man must have logical and reasonable rules (a code) to abide by, and must agree amongst themselves to follow those unalienable truths in nature in order to live in peace and to protect themselves, their neighbors, and the very Earth they claim as home together – heaven. This is the essence of the Bible; the essence of following the laws of nature.

How difficult would this really be to accomplish, compared to the millions of codes and statues of man that no one can ever comprehend, let alone count? Well, try this one all-encompassing law on for size…

Do no harm.

That’s it! Sweet and simple.

In fact, any law that man can create for the actual benefit of society would automatically fall under this simple Maxim. In a shocking paradox to this simple truth, most of man’s laws create the opposite – a license and permission to break God’s commandments and natural law and thus to legally harm other “persons”, which directly effects the natural man possessed of that person in surety. This is in-deed just an end run around responsibility to your fellow man for your own actions – a way to cause harm and get “off the hook” for it. And this is truly anti-Christ.

The following words are defined for the benefit of the reader who wishes to finally bring logic and reason to the rhetoric and allegory of the Bible – the officially authorized legal presentation and evidence (testament) of law, issued by King James, 1611. The following is not religion, and in point of fact is quite far from it. For the Bible is not about religion, and is in fact surprisingly shunning of such corporate things as religion and government. Religions and their proclaimed doctrines are built around and very much in spite of the Bible’s words. Religions indeed existed long before the Bible was ever written, and have created many gods and tools of control over the ages. Thus religion and the Bible are not synonymous in any way, except for the claims made by religions and governments (both are churches known as corporation sole’s) to the contrary in order to control the information we are about to uncover. Information is power. Power (authority of law)  is control. And ignorance enslaves those without knowledge, causing them to “perish”.

As we delve into the true meaning of the scriptures (defined as ancient written knowledge and understanding, not necessarily of religion), we discover that quite shockingly there are no true Biblical “Christians” in America. Amazingly, the very book to prove this statement has all along been the very Bible that corporate churches twist and use to mislead good people into a state of anti-christian thought, behavior, custom, and lifestyle. It is indeed ironic that the atheist’s greatest weapon against religion turns out to be the Bible itself!!! But how do men of any religious or non-religious claim use it correctly to defeat those men who act as gods on Earth with the usurped authority of that book?

For the critic and “non-believer”, the following legal understanding of the words in that Bible is perhaps the greatest tool against organized corporate religion (and government) available, as presented in our dictionaries. For incredibly, even that word “believer” is a legal term, and means something other than what religion proclaims.

And what is more religiously doctrinal than the belief in the legitimacy of government and the patriotic indoctrination that is created from it? As it stands, the average citizen-person of the United States or any other government for that matter does the following…

They believe in government, as if it were not a work of fiction (a corporation/person).

They have faith in government, placing all love and devotion within this artificial thing.

They have trust in government; a financial bond enslaving them as surety to things unnatural.

They declare a pledge of fealty (allegiance) to government, salute its war flag, and even invoke the name of God to justify man’s authority over God (nature).

They obey the millions of commandments (legal laws) of government, which gives (issues) them license to “sin” against the laws and commandments of nature (God’s law).

They seek remedy, redemption, and salvation in government, which can only offer such things to artificial persons, not men. These are legal terms.

They pray (plead) to government in its courts, asking fictional characters to judge their actions instead of God.

They are servants (in servitude) to that government fiction, disobeying the laws of nature as a requirement of tenure.

They consider government as their master, and even bless it in prayer to God, though it was created by men.

They worship government’s paper constitution as if it were the Bible, claiming it to be inspired by God and even claiming rights from it above God, even though it is patently against everything written in the Bible.

See the similarities here? The question is, why is it so easy to believe in an absolutely known fiction called government and yet the same belief and faith in our tangible nature all around us and the laws of its “creator” are labeled as silly and fictional?

What is real, the grass that grows or the municipal corporation (city) codes that regulate its growth?

What is fiction, the legal codes of government or the omnipresence of nature all around us?

Your answer depends solely on the disposition of your soul: Are you a natural man (being human), or are you im-person-ating an artificial, fictional person like a demon?

Imagine if instead of teasing or demeaning people for having a spiritual connection to nature in the form of a belief in God as if God was the reality of nature, misguided as some may be, you teased people for believing in government  instead – which by its own laws, definitions, and admission in its own courts is a complete and utter fictional story requiring consent and acceptance to its purely imaginary, contractual existence?

Ha ha ha! You believe in government? What an idiot! It doesn’t even exist in nature! Even it doesn’t believe it exists! LOL!!!

I guarantee that this is exactly what the powers that be in government and religion say behind your backs as they strip you of your life, liberty, prosperity, and happiness. Of course, they tell you that these traits are protected under the constitution even as they take them from you at will, paying you money that says “In God We Trust”. And indeed they are protected by the constitution if you are a responsible living man under God as it states, but not if you foolishly become a citizen and give up those natural unalienable rights in a permissive and obligatory contract to government to possess a subjected person (demon) of government that have no unalienable rights. In other words, men and people are not the same thing. Only men, not people, are listed as having unalienable rights. They are tricky like that…

In truth, the answer is now clear to me, though it has taken my whole life to fall upon such comprehension. It’s a simple case of mistaken identity! Men believe that they truly are the artificial person they pretend to be, which is in fact property of government. Like an actor believes he is the character he plays on the stage to improve the preformance, men forget they are natural beings, which are property of God (nature), and instead abandon the laws of nature (God) by accepting an immense legal doctrine from government – much worse than any religious one.

Government is simply a Godless religion!

Living men destroy nature (God’s kingdom) by not being in their own minds but act in that of their citizen-person, doing so without conscious as artificial representatives of their selves; as citizens. They refer to their actions as they’ve been brainwashed to do using patriotic terms like civil liberties, civil rights, liberty, and freedom (all legal privileges of persons), and they do so under the banner (flag) of their fictional master – a government that protects the actions of these demons (citizens) by granting licenses to kill, to steal, to rape, to pillage, to plunder, and to blaspheme all that is sacred in nature (under God’s dominion and law).

Blasphemy in the legal fiction is again a legal term, meaning crime against the church and state. Belief and faith in government is the belief and faith (trust) that man is god, contractually speaking. And with no higher authority, men through government may control other men in spite of God and nature, and in spite of the Bible’s teachings that this is an unnatural status that can only exist through the “respect of persons”.

Under God a man is only ever himself, and has no person to hide himself away from his responsibilities. He or she acknowledges his or her actions and takes responsibility for them as forgiveness for his sin against nature (legally known as restitution). Thus the man has no need of the laws of other men (Satan), for he belongs to God, and need not be compelled to take responsibility for harm.

Under government, as a citizen, it is quite the opposite. Man hides behind his or her artificial person, and the crimes against nature (including to other men) are “forgiven” only by government, for the fictional person belongs to the fictional government, and crime is against persons not men. Like a puppet, man inhabits the person and acts under it, taking man outside of God’s protection of true law. In other words, as a person, man must give up all rights under God (man’s unalienable inherent rights), for government law is always anti-nature (anti-God/anti-Christ) and can never be inherent, for those rights are copyrighted fictions of man, and are always artificial (opposed to nature/not inherent). Government granted rights are to persons, not men, including those “people” of the constitution. And so for a man to answer for his or her crimes, he or she must embrace this fact and stand in person (impersonation) on an actors stage called a court not as a human being, but by possessing a demon (person). This is called representation. In order to use and operate a government citizen (demon/artificial person), a man must re-present him or her self not as a human, but as that demon. The man represents and is bound in surety to the actions of the artificial person.

Representation of PersonsA fiction of the law, the effect of which is to put the representative in the place, degree, or right of the person represented. Civil Code La. art. 894. (–Black’s 1st Edition)

Represent – v. t. s as z. [Latin repraesento; re and Low Latin praesenter, from praesens, present.] – 1. To show or exhibit by resemblance. 4. To personate; to act the character or to fill the place of another in a play; as, to represent the character of king Richard. 5. To supply the place of; to act as a substitute for another. The parliament of Great Britain represents the nation. The congress of the United States represents the people or nation. The senate is considered as representing the states in their corporate capacity7. To stand in the place of, in the right of inheritance.

As we study the words in the Bible, we slowly comprehend that the Bible is not at all about death or about a mystical life after our physical departure from this Earth, for it was written by men who had only but lived here on Earth and could not have reasonably known God or an afterlife. Instead, the Bible is an allegorical instruction book about how to live on this earth, within the constructs of nature, without religion and without government, and yet to adhere to the laws of nature so as to preserve and live healthy lives. It is a story about living life in the fullest.

Ironically, to inhabit and impersonate an artificial person is in fact to accept death (fiction) and to oppose life (nature). There is no life or nature within legal statutes, and I’m sure I don’t have to convince anyone by now that a fictional person is not alive.

Ultimately, the Bible offers two paths, one of grace (life) in nature under God’s law and one of fiction (death) within church and state under man’s legal fiction (mammon), and it leaves that choice up to the individual.

It’s all about choice… a choice between two rulers – God (law of nature) and Satan (law of man).

Grace or disgrace.

Of course in modern times this knowledge is lost on men, and is hidden by both the church and the state’s “forced government education”, either purposefully (Vatican) or through ignorance (small local churches of any denomination).

I realize now that men have been thrown into citizenship without ever being truly provided with a consenting choice. In this way, men are created (re-presented) as gentiles (goyim), which is defined as “people” – the common mass of peasantry and lowest status of person. We are acting as the synagogue wishes us to act, in the capacity of its property through impersonation. This creates inequity on a grand scale (which we ironically call legal “equality), and confers a concentration of power unprecedented in history that milks “public” wealth to its own ends. As persons, we have no sex, no race, no specialness, no culture. We are equal in our corporate blandness and rights – a machine. This unnatural state is exactly what the Bible warns against – an army of dead persons; the dead walking the Earth. That’s us…

The Bible is an instruction book on being free in life, not death. It instructs us on being responsible for our own actions within a state of love and protection to all men with sanctity of the same rights and duty to others. It tells us how to protect nature and the laws governing our use of Earth while we are here, as well as each other. It advises us on avoiding the bondage and servitude of the corporate institutions that would otherwise use that book of God’s natural law to entrap and enfranchise the whole of mankind into bonded servitude to a small minority of men (a synagogue of Satan) against nature in the world of corporate fiction, which is often interpreted by fools to be the sole basis of the book as a justification of the evils of the church. Of course, to understand evil, one must describe it and how to avoid it.

What is evil?

EVILn. Evil is natural or moral. Natural evil is any thing which produces pain, distress, loss or calamity, or which in any way disturbs the peace, impairs the happiness, or destroys the perfection of natural beings. Moral evil is any deviation of a moral agent from the rules of conduct prescribed to him by God, or by legitimate human authority; or it is any violation of the plain principles of justice and rectitude. There are also evils called civil, which affect injuriously the peace or prosperity of a city or state; and political evils, which injure a nation, in its public capacity. All wickedness, all crimes, all violations of law and right are moral evils. Diseases are natural evils, but they often proceed from moral evils. 2. Misfortune; mischief; injury. There shall no evil befall thee. Psalms 91:10. A prudent man foreseeth the evil and hideth himself. Proverbs 22:3. 3. Depravity; corruption of heart, or disposition to commit wickedness; malignity.

Satan is and describes man. The concept of Satan is not some pitchforked demon as portrayed in a child’s story told to frighten the children of men til they die, in order to compel their obedience to obey church doctrine and government legality. It is not a he or a she. It is a descriptive word for the concept of influence of all men against nature (against God) and the laws of nature.

Satan – noun [Heb. an adversary.] The grand adversary of man; the devil or prince of darkness; the chief of the fallen angels.

Devil – n. Devl. [Latin , to calumniate.] 1. In the Christian theology, an evil spirit or being; a fallen angel, expelled from heaven for rebellion against God; the chief of the apostate angels; the implacable enemy and tempter of the human race. In the New Testament, the word is frequently and erroneously used for demon. 2. A very wicked person, and in ludicrous language, an great evil. In profane language, it is an expletive expressing wonder, vexation, etc. 3. An idol, or false god. Leviticus 17:7. 2 Chronicles 11:15.

As we can read, the word Satan refers to the Hebrew word for the “adversary of man”. Like the word demon, there is no supernatural quackery here. The Bible allegory uses fire and brimstone to describe men of unfettered evil genius that are adversarial to nature and life, and therefore must place other men in bondage and surety to them through the concepts of government and religion. Monsanto, Ratheon, Bank of America, the Vatican, the City of London, Washington D.C… these are the personifications of men in rebellion against God (nature); idols of false gods. Mere men. Satan incarnate.

So far, the synagogue of Satan has suppressed not only the Bible’s teachings, but also the path to abandon of all mankind from government. It has created in men a false status misleadingly called “Christianity”, that under church doctrine follow government as the “law of the land” while abusing and usurping God’s creation (nature). In truth, every action of today’s modern Christian is against the teachings of the Bible and its Christ character.

“Where there is no free agency, there can be no morality.
Where there is no temptation, there can be little claim to virtue.
Where the routine is rigorously proscribed by law,
the law,  and not the man, must have the credit of the conduct.”

–William H. Prescott, “History of the Conquest of Peru,” 1847

Here are just some of the “religious” legal words that in actuality are quite opposed to religion, to government, and that are designed to make all men free in their comprehension by and through the allegory of the Bible:

–=–

The Following Are Taken From:
Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the American Language
Unless Otherwise Noted

–=–

Nickname – n. [G. To banter. Signifies to surname, to call by a name of reproach.] A name given in contempt, derision or reproach; an opprobrious appellation.- v.t. To give a name of reproach; to call by an opprobrious appellation.

Opprobrious – a. [See Opprobrium.] 1. Reproachful and contemptuous; scurrilous; as opprobrious language; opprobrious words or terms. 2. Blasted with infamy; despised; rendered hateful; as an opprobrious name.

Appellationn. [L. appellatio. See Appeal.] Name; the word by which a thing is called and known. Spenser uses it for appeal.

Render n. 1. A surrender; a giving up. 2. A return; a payment of rent. – v. t. [This is probably the Latin reddo, with a casually inserted.] 1. To return; to pay back. See that none render evil for evil to any man. 1 Thessalonians 5:15. 6. To surrender; to yield or give up the command or possession of; as, to render one’s self to his enemies. 7. To afford; to give for use or benefit. Washington rendered great service to his country. 8. To represent; to exhibit. To render back, to return; to restore.

(Note: To render back what is Caesar’s means to stop using the government’s property, money, and person-hood (citizenship) and to give it back with no intention to ever use it again. This is often confused to mean bow down to government in that Bible verse, but is in fact the opposite. Only in rendering back the use of government property (the person/surname) to government can one be free of its implied and contractual usury, taxation, and other obligations of that government for usage of government property. The surname and social security number are examples of government property used by men against God and nature that should be “rendered back to Caesar”.)

Surname – n. [L. super and nomen.] 1. An additional name; a name or appellation added to the baptismal or christian name, and which becomes a family name. Surnames, with us, originally designated occupation, estate, place of residence, or some particular thing or event that related to the person. Thus William Rufus or red; Edmund Ironsides; Robert Smith,or the smith; William Turner. 2. An appellation added to the original name.

Christian Name – the name a person receives by baptism, as distinguished from surname.

Addition – n. [Latin additio, from addo.] 1. The act of adding, opposed to subtraction, or diminution; as, a sum is increased by addition. 2. Any thing added, whether material or immaterial. 4. In law, a title annexed to a man’s name, to show his rank, occupation or place of residence; as John Doe, Esq.; Richard Roe, Gent; Robert Dale, Mason; Thomas Way, of New York.8. In popular language, an advantage, ornament, improvement; that is, an addition by way of eminence.

Diminution – n. [Latin] 1. The act of lessening; a making smaller; opposed to augmentation; as the diminution of size, of wealth, of power, of safety. 2. The state of becoming or appearing less; opposed to increase; as the diminution of the apparent diameter of a receding body. 3. Discredit; loss of dignity; degradation. 4. Deprivation of dignity; a lessening of estimation.

(Note: A surname is an addition, meaning it is a fiction added to the given name. This combination makes the person. The addition of the surname is actually a dimunition from God’s natural law. To “appear” as less refers to standing in a courtroom, as a status in the legal society. This makes you “common” and means you are no longer under God’s jurisdiction and protection under the laws of nature (unalienable rights), for you are no longer acting as a man under God but as a fictional person owned by another. This is a step down, a loss of dignity, and degradation. Only a person can appear in court, and only as less than a man.)

Baptism, n. [Gr. to baptize.] 2. The sufferings of Christ. Matt.xx22.23.

(Note: Baptism is simply the naming process, and does not require a religion, blessed water (for all water is considered as created and therefore it is all blessed), or a priest from a corporate church, all of which are “idolatry” and ceremonial. The Bible story of true Christianity is indeed strictly against ceremony, religion, and government’s act of bestowing surnames to “persons”. No church or priest needed, only intent. Thus, the given name is said to be a gift from God through the remedy of the sufferings of Christ. See “son”.)

Name – n. That by which a thing is called. A noun. A person. Assumed character of another. Authority; behalf; part; as in the name of the people. Appearance only; sound only; not reality; as a friend in name. (Rev. 3). When a man speaks or acts in the name of another, he does it by their authority or in their behalf, as their representative. Reputation; character; that which is commonly said of a person; as a good name; a bad name. Renown; fame; honor; celebrity; eminence; praise; distinction.- v.t. To entitle.

Name – The designation of an individual person, or of a firm or corporation. In law a man cannot have more than one Christian name. 1 Ld. Baym. 562. (Black’s 1st Edition)

Noun – n. [altered from Latin name.] In grammar, a name; that sound or combination of sounds by which a thing is called, whether material or immaterial. [See name.]

(Note: The legal language is composed mostly of nouns – the names of persons, places, and things, which are all artificial “legal titles” of actual things. A name as a noun is not natural, for it is always of the hands of man. It is strictly a legal definition in acknowledgement of those persons, places, and things. However, in the legal realm the “given name” or “Christian name” (first name) is considered a gift from God (a natural and unalienable right unnameable in legal fiction) . The first name alone cannot be considered a person in law without an attached (added) surname. This is very important. All things are legally named (titled) by government (man) in the form of a noun, giving government jurisdiction over the surname or “title” of persons, places, and things. The name/noun or “title” is artificial and not of nature. It merely describes natural things in fictional terms to bring them into the realm of legalese.)

Nominative – a. Pertaining to the name which precedes a verb, or to the first case of nouns; as the nominative case or nominative word.

Misnomer – n. In law, the mistaking of the true name of a person; a misnaming…

Nomen (plural nomina) was the Roman gens (clan) name. In the typical Roman name it was preceded by the praenomen and followed by the cognomen.

Praenomen – Lat. Forename, or first name. The first of the three names by which the Romans were commonly distinguished. It marked the individual, and was commonly written with one letter; as “A.” for “Aulus;” “C.” for “Caius,” etc… (Note: By the 2nd century, praenomina were no longer commonly used.)

Cognomen – In Roman law. A man’s family name. The first name (praenomen) was the proper name of the individual; the second (nomen) indicated the gens or tribe to which he belonged; while the third (cognomen) denoted his family or house. In English law. A surname. A name added to the nomen proper, or name of the individual; a name descriptive of the family. Cognomen majorum est ex sanguine tractum, hoc intrinsecum est; agnomen extrinsecum ab eventu. The cognomen is derived from the blood of ancestors, and is intrinsic; an agnomen arises from an event, and is extrinsic. (Note: Originally cognomina were nicknames. Thus the cognomen in combination with the nomen functioned as a surname, breaking families into smaller groups than just the nomen alone.) (Black’s 1st Edition)

Agnomen – Lat. An additional name or title; a nickname. A name or title which a man gets by some action or peculiarity; the last of the four names sometimes given a Roman. Thus, Scipio Africanus, (the African,) from his African victories. (These were generally nicknames acquired at some point during the lifetime, but never given at birth.) (Black’s 1st Edition)

AgnominationA surname; an additional name or title; agnomen. (Black’s 1st Edition)

Patronym (or patronymic) is a name derived from the name of the father or another paternal ancestor. Some surnames are patronymic in origin, like Peterson = “Peter’s son”. Some cultures, such as Iceland, use uninherited patronyms instead of surnames. (BehindTheName.com)

Acquire – v t. [Latin acquiro, ad and quaero to seek, that is to follow, to press, to urge; acquiro signifies to pursue to the end or object; Heb. to seek, to make towards, to follow. The Latin quaesivi, unless contracted, is probably from a different root. See class Gr. and Gs.] To gain, by any means, something which is in a degree permanent, or which becomes vested or inherent in the possessor; as, to acquire a title (name), estate, learning, habits, skill, dominion, etc. Plants acquire a green color from the solar rays. A mere temporary possession is not expressed by acquire but by gain, obtain, procure, as to obtain [not acquire] a book on loan. Descent is the title whereby a man, on the death of his ancestor, acquires his estate, by right of representation, as his heir at law.

ForsakeTo quit or leave entirely; to desert; to abandon; to depart from. Friends and flatterers forsake us in adversity. Forsake the foolish, and live. (Prov. 9.2). To abandon; to renounce; to reject. If his children forsake my law, and walk not in my judgments – (Ps. 89). To leave; to withdraw from; to fail.

(Note: You must forsake the person to live free in abandon under God and nature. Never forget that a person is a fiction of man’s law.)

Fiction – n. [L. fictio, from fingo, to feign.] 1. The act of feigning, inventing or imagining; as, by the mere fiction of the mind. 2. That which is feigned, invented or imagined. The story is a fiction. So also was the fiction of those golden apples kept by a dragon, taken from the serpent which tempted Eve.

Remedy – n. [L. remedium; re and medeor, to heal.] 1. That which cures a disease; any medicine or application which puts an end to disease and restores health; with for; as a remedy for the gout. 2. That which counteracts an evil of any kind; with for, to or against; usually with for. Civil government is the remedy for the evils of natural liberty (and thus the opposite must be true). 3. That which cures uneasiness. 4. That which repairs loss or disaster; reparation. In the death of a man there is no remedy.

(Note: Christianity is the only remedy from man’s law. No living man can get remedy from an agency that only deals in fiction (death). Your reparation to nature and God is to counteract your demon by quitting (quitclaim) your possession of it. To quit government, you must have a higher authority than man to govern you. This is the nature of man’s law, not my opinion. And government will require proof of claim of a higher authority, which is why so many men have evidenced the Bible as their own law in court.)

Death -In theology, perpetual separation from God, and eternal torments; called the second death Revelation 2:10.

Spiritual DeathSeparation or alienation of the soul from God; a being under the dominion of sin, and destitute of grace or divine lifeWe know that we have passed from death to life, because we love the brethren. 1 John 3:1. Luke I.

(Note: “Spiritual death” is the contractual consent to abandon God’s law and protection, denounce Jesus Christ as lawful remedy to be in lawful receivership of God’s law and protection, and give up the unalienable rights of the law of nature so that government can harm your person without recourse as it controls your surname.)

Civil Death The separation of a man from civil society, or from the enjoyment of civil rights; as by banishment, abjuration of the realm, entering into a monastery, etc.

(Note: One must have civil death in order to only be considered a natural living being under God. This means giving up all privileges (civil rights) and obligations (duties) granted by government (for a rich man cannot enter the kingdom of heaven). Government and its courts cannot see living things, only the im-person-ation of living things as legal persons with (noun) names and surnames. In other words, the synagogue of Satan can only see demons. But without the remedy of the invocation of true Christianity (the Bible), that life would be considered by government to be non-spiritual (strictly temporal) and without a governing set of laws. In other words, government would consider you as chattel livestock with no rights either civil or natural, for no invocation of God’s law (the law of nature) was recorded. In this vein, the concept of a “free man on the land” is missing the key element of the law of God as a lawful declaration of governance. You can only serve one master, not two… but also not zero. You must choose and declare God’s law through the lawful remedy of Christ in order for government to recognize your negative rights. Remember, this is not a declaration of religion or status, but rather a notice to government that you do not recognize it as the god on Earth it pretends to be – that government is not the vicar or replacement of Christ – and that you will access your personal God as you see fit. Thus, you must acknowledge a higher authority than government, which government will only lawfully recognize as the biblical God. This is a legal process, not religion. It is the basis of law and authority, and invoking the “authorized” higher power of God is the only available recourse to get out from under government tyranny as false-god.)

Abjuration – n. [See Abjure.] 1. The act of abjuring; a renunciation upon oath; as ‘an abjuration of the realm, ‘ by which a person swears to leave the country, and never to return. It is used also for the oath of renunciation. Formerly in England, felons, taking refuge in a church, and confessing their guilt, could not be arrested and tried, but might save their lives by abjuring the realm; that is by taking an oath to quit the kingdom forever. 2. A rejection or denial with solemnity; a total abandonment; as ‘an abjuration of heresy.’

(Note: It is very important here to recognize that a country is nothing but a piece of paper, and some imaginary lines drawn on a map. You are not ever in a county, state, nation, city, town, district, or any other legal fiction because quite simply, they are fiction and you are non-fiction. You as a living being cannot be physically in a state. A state is a legal document. You must accept a fictional status to become a character in that legal fiction (jurisdiction). Thus to swear an oath to God to never return to a country simply means that you swear to God to never leave the kingdom of God in nature, never be artificial again, and that God’s law is the only law despite the claims of government. You can only be in God’s kingdom, not man’s fiction. Only a fictional person can inhabit a fictional realm. Thus the term “abjuration of the realm” literally means never respecting persons or anything man-made, for the realm is also just a fictional legal document. The term “leave the country” simply means to give up (abandon) citizenship to be governed by God (higher authority) instead of man.)

Heresy – In Scripture and primitive usage, heresy meant merely sect, party, or the doctrines of a sect, as we now use denomination or persuasion, implying no reproach. 2. heresy in law, is an offense against Christianity, consisting in a denial of some of its essential doctrines, publicly avowed and obstinately maintained. 3. An untenable or unsound opinion or doctrine in politics.

(Note: Here the reference to an “offense against Christianity” is referring to an offense against the corporate church doctrine and political laws of government, not the Bible itself. This is not true Christianity (what’s taught in the Bible), which is against religion and organized church and legal law. We know this simply because this dictionary definition says “in law” (meaning “legally speaking”), thus we know it speaks only as something artificial/fictional, as all man’s laws are, and thus can only be offended by civil law persons, not natural human beings. Thus, it is literally heresy to disagree with government’s legal law and doctrine as a person. The trick is to distinguish within the Bible when the law is of nature and God and when it is of man acting as god and vicar. Many or most of the mentions of “god” and “lord” in the Bible refer to the kings who claim to rule as God on Earth in Christ’s departure (until His return). The Bible switches between capitalized God and little god; Lord and lord.)

SaveTo except, reserve, or exempt; as where a statute “saves” vested rights. To toll, or suspend the running or operation of; as to “save” the statute of limitations.

(Note: To be saved is to stop acting or “impersonating” something else that is not under God (in nature). To cease to be an artificial person is saving yourself and acting under God and nature again (becoming a “christian”). In religion, they will tell you that you can be saved and still be a citizen (fiction/person). Religion seeks to control you through fiction under the doctrine of “law of the land”. Government is religion. This doctrine is contrary to the nature of life itself (a person is not natural), thus by default is contrary to “God”. Either save yourself under God or remain a debtor person subject to man. Again, you cannot serve two masters. You must choose between God and mammon. To be “born again” is to quit using your artificial person and be reborn into this life on Earth, that’s all.)

Saver Default – L. Fr. In old English practice. To excuse a default. Termes de la Ley.

Saving the Statute of Limitations – A creditor is said to “save the statute of limitations” when he saves or preserves his debt from being barred by the operation of the statute. Thus, in the case of a simple contract debt, if a creditor commences an action for its recovery within six years from the time when the cause of action accrued, he will be in time to save the statute. Brown.

Injure – v.t. [Latin injuria, injury.] 1. To hurt or wound, as the person; to impair soundness, as of health. 2. To damage or lessen the value of, as goods or estate. 3. To slander, tarnish or impair, as reputation or character. 4. To impair or diminish; to annoy; as happiness. 5. To give pain to; to grieve; as sensibility or feelings. 7. To hurt or weaken; as, to injure a good cause. 8. To impair; to violate; as, to injure rights. 9. To make worse; as, great rains injure the roads. 10. In general, to wrong the person, to damage the property, or to lessen the happiness of ourselves or others. A man injures his person by wounds, his estate by negligence or extravagance, and his happiness by vices. He injures his neighbor by violence to his person, by fraud, by calumny, and by non-fulfillment of his contracts.

(Note: To injure (to cause injury) means to cause need for an action by or against another man or person. It literally means that you’ve done harm to another person or another against you. To injure is to bring some thing into law (jure = law). In the legal fiction world, such harms can be claimed by artificial persons where the harm is not in any way in nature and has no effect on the man claiming that person-hood. In and under God’s law, also called the “Laws of Nature”, a living man is responsible for all his or her own actions, and therefore there will never be need for injury – no need for man’s legal remedies in courts of men. Only a man that is not responsible for his own actions would need to be injured (brought into law) by man’s legal fiction. Under god, man lives by the simple credo of “do no harm”. No harm literally and consequentially translates to and presents no injury, and thus no person can be harmed under God, for a person is artificial and cannot truly be harmed in nature (reality). In this hierarchy, God is the creator and ruler of man, and under that, man is the god and ruler of persons. God creates man, and only then can man create persons (again this is not a religious view, but a legal precedent). A man of God cannot be charged with harming or injuring a person, for again the man is of God while the person is a fictional creation of man. Man is always superior to persons. Only a person can harm a person (act or crime of fiction), and only a man can harm a man (act of God). Mammon never trumps God, thus an artificial person never trumps a living man. To avoid being in-jured (brought into man’s fictional realm), we must abandon our fictional person to ensure abjuration from that realm. The legal realm can only exist within man’s realm. Without God, there be no man. Without man, there be no fiction of man. This is a legal concept, and it requires not your belief in any doctrine. Unfortunately, even if you don’t believe in it, it believes in you, for this is the maxim of law and it ultimately controls your person whether you like it or not. In legal law, a person’s reputation can be harmed, for it is artificial as is the law that protects it. In nature, a man’s reputation cannot be harmed in law, for it is real. In legality, a persons reputation is a mark or blemish (mark of the beast) and includes credit score, prison record, etc. In nature, man’s reputation is his actual actions and trustworthiness in life, not on paper. Without it, he will be shunned. Politicians and thieves thrive in the artificial world where reputation (credit score) can be fixed with money, power, and influence. In nature, there is no such system, for no man has title or status above another, and no demons are allowed or respected.)

Quit – Ad. Free; clear; discharged from; absolved 4. To quit one’s self, reciprocally, to clear one’s self of incumbent duties by full performance. 11. To forsake; to abandon. Such a superficial way of examining is to quit truth for appearance. To quit cost, to pay; to free from by an equivalent; to reimburse; as, the cultivation of barren land will not always quit cost. 9. To leave; to give up; to resign; to relinquish; as, to quit an office. 6. To vacate obligation; to release; to free from – Dangers of law, actions, decrees, judgments against us quitted. 2. To free; to clear; to liberate; to discharge from. 3. To carry through; to do or perform something to the end, so that nothing remains; to discharge or perform completely.

Quit – Clear; discharged; free; also spoken of persons absolved or acquitted of a charge. (Blacks Law 1st)

Quitclaim, v. t. [quit and claim.] To release a claim by deed without covenants of warranty; to convey to another who hath some right in lands or tenements, all one’s right, title and interest in the estate, by relinquishing all claim to them. The words used in the instrument are, ‘A hath remised, released and forever quitclaimed all his right, title and interest to a certain estate. – n. A deed of release; an instrument by which all claims to an estate are relinquished to another without any covenant or warranty, express or implied.

Quitclaim – v. In conveyancing. To release or relinquish a claim; to execute a deed of quitclaim. – n. A release or acquittance given to one man by another, in respect of any action that he has or might have against him. Also acquitting or giving up one’s claim or title. (Black’s Law 1st)

Quitclaim Deed –  A deed of conveyance operating by way of release; that is, intended to pass any title, interest, or claim which the grantor may have in the premises, but not professing that such title is valid, nor containing any warranty or covenants for title. (Black’s Law 1st)

(Note: A quitclaim is a legal document, quitting or ceasing to claim possession of the person, and conveying (transferring) it back to its owner government. It is like getting out of your car and abandoning it, never to drive (use) it again. Unless you quite claiming to be a person under mammon, you can never claim to be a man under God., for you may not serve two masters. You must discharge by dismissal your connection to anything artificial that might draw you back into the realm of fiction. You must take responsibility for your self 100% of the time with no exceptions. You cannot ever officially claim the surname again.)

Conveyance – n. 1. The act of conveying; the act of bearing, carrying, or transporting, by land or water, or through any medium. 2. The act of transmitting, or transferring, as titles, estates or claims from one person to another; transmission; transference; assignment. 3. The instrument or means of passing a thing from place to place, or person to person; as, a vehicle is a conveyance for persons or goods; a canal or aqueduct is a conveyance for water; a deed is a conveyance of land. 4. Removal; the act of removing or carrying. 5. Management; artifice; secret practices.

Discharge – n. 4. Dismission from office or service; or the writing which evidences the dismission. The general, the soldier, obtains a discharge.  5. Release from obligation, debt or penalty; or the writing which is evidence of it; an acquittance; as, the debtor has a discharge. 6. Absolution from a crime or accusation; acquittance. 7. Ransom; liberation; price paid for deliverance. 8. Performance; execution; applied to an office, trust or duty. A good man is faithful in the discharge of his duties, public and private. 9. Liberation; release from imprisonment or other confinement. 10. Exemption; escape. 11. Payment, as of a debt.

Acquittance – n. 1. A discharge or release from a debt. 2. The writing, which is evidence of a discharge; a receipt in full, which bars a further demand.

Deliverance – n.  1. Release from captivity, slavery, oppression, or any restraint. He hath sent me to heal the broken-hearted, to preach deliverance to the captives. Luke 4:18. 2. Rescue from danger or any evil. God sent me to save your lives by a great deliverance Genesis 45:7. 3. The act of bringing forth children. 4. The act of giving or transferring from one to another. 5. The act of speaking or pronouncing; utterance. [In the three last senses, delivery is now used.] 6. Acquittal of a prisoner, by the verdict of a jury. God send you a good deliverance.

Salvation – n. [Latin salvo, to save.] 1. The act of saving; preservation from destruction, danger or great calamity. 2. Appropriately in theology, the redemption of man from the bondage of sin and liability to eternal death, and the conferring on him everlasting happiness. This is the great salvation. 3. Deliverance from enemies; victory. Exodus 14:13. 4. Remission of sins, or saving graces. Luke 19:9.

(Note: Eternal death refers again to acting in dead pledge as a person, in bondage and liability/debt to the government. To live your life as something artificial is to live your life as a dead person. The legal redemption of your soul from this captivity is what the allegory of the Bible speaks about.)

Redemptionn. [Latin redemptio. See Redeem.] 1. Repurchase of captured goods or prisoners; the act of procuring the deliverance of persons or things from the possession and power of captors by the payment of an equivalent; ransom; release; as the redemption of prisoners taken in war; the redemption of a ship and cargo. 2. Deliverance from bondage, distress, or from liability to any evil or forfeiture, either by money, labor or other means. 3. Repurchase, as of lands alienated. Leviticus 25:24. Jeremiah 32:7. 4. The liberation of an estate from a mortgage; or the purchase of the right to re-enter upon it by paying the principal sum for which it was mortgaged with interest and cost; also, the right of redeeming and re-entering.6. In theology, the purchase of God’s favor by the death and sufferings of Christ; the ransom or deliverance of sinners from the bondage of sin and the penalties of God’s violated law by the atonement of Christ. In whom we have redemption through his blood. Ephesians 1:7. Colossians 1:14.

Distress – n. [See Stress.] 1. The act of distraining; the taking of any personal chattel from a wrong-doer, to answer a demand, or procure satisfaction for a wrong committed. 2. The thing taken by distraining; that which is seized to procure satisfaction. 4. Affliction; calamity; misery. On earth distress of nations. Luke 21:23. v.t. 1. To pain; to afflict with pain or anguish; applied to the body or the mind. [Literally, to press or strain.] 2. To afflict greatly; to harass; to oppress with calamity; to make miserable.

Distrain – v.t. [Latin Dis and stringo. See Strain. Blackstone writes distrein.] 1. To seize for debt; to take a personal chatel from the possession of a wrong-doer into the possession of the injured party, to satisfy a demand, or compel the performance of a duty; as, to distrain goods fro rent, or for an amercement. 2. To rend; to tear. – v.i. To make seizure of goods. For neglecting to do suit to the lords court, or other personal service, the lord may distrain of common right.

(Note: In all cases, the property of a person (citizen) and resident is the property of the State, for the person is also property of the State. A person can only be a tenant of State property, and so government will put a person in distress to take (distrain) that property on behalf of itself or for corporations (banks) that foreclose in its name and protection when the person does not pay his or her debts. This action of demand could not be done on living man with claimed higher authority (God), for man is above (god of) that fiction. A distress against a living man is not lawful, while a distress against an artificial person is no crime, for a person is not alive.)

Mortgagen.. 1. Literally, a dead pledge; the grant of an estate in fee as security for the payment of money, and on the condition that if the money shall be paid according to the contract, the grant shall be void, and the mortgagee shall re-convey the estate to the mortgager2. The state of being pledged; as lands given in mortgage. 3. A pledge of goods or chattels by a debtor to a creditor, as security for the debt.  v. t. 1. To pledge; to make liable to the payment of any debt or expenditure.

Mortmain – n.In law, possession of lands or tenements in dead hands, or hands that cannot alienate. Alienation in mortmain is an alienation of lands or tenements to any corporation, sole or aggregate, ecclesiastical or temporal, particularly to religious houses, by which the estate becomes perpetually inherent in the corporation and unalienable.

(Note: Dead, dead, dead. That’s what a person is. Thus a mortgage is a pledge by a dead person, which can only hold that property with (imaginary) dead hands. And a person cannot alienate, therefore a person cannot stop government (corporation) from taking. The word “fee” is equal to the word feudal or fief. It’s time you realize that you live in a modernized feudal state that has been around since before the Bible was written – an ancient system of pledging now streamlined and computerized.)

Alienablea. That may be sold, or transferred to another; as, land is alienable according to the laws of the State.

Unalienable – a. Not alienable; that cannot be alienated; that may not be transferred; as unalienable rights.

Inalienable – a. [Latin alieno, alienus.] Unalienable; that cannot be legally or justly alienated or transferred to another. The dominions of a king are inalienable. All men have certain natural rights which are inalienable. The estate of a minor is inalienable without a reservation of the right of redemption, or the authority of the legislature.

(Note: Inalienable is the legal version of unalienable, but legal rights (privileges) can be taken or given away within an inalienable state, where natural (unalienable rights) cannot. Remember, nothing Government grants to persons (rights/benefits) are unalienable. Thus, while in the United States jurisdiction, property is always inalienable (alienable only by legal means), and thus legally property and land can be taken under eminent domain because the property does not belong to a man, but to a government created corporation or person. When property of any kind is registered under a surname, that property and land becomes government owned, where the person can only be a tenant (user). An artificial fictional thing (citizen) cannot own anything in nature, thus men as persons (demons) have no real property rights in the United States. All rights of persons are in fact ultimately artificial, and thus are ultimately always considered legally alienable under the doctrine of necessity.)

Pray – n. 2. To petition; to ask, as for a favor; as in application to a legislative body.

Prayer – The request contained in a bill in equity that the court will grant the process, aid, or relief which the complainant desires. Also, by extension, the term is applied to that part of the bill which contains this request. (Black’s Law 1st)

Prayer of Process – is a petition with which a bill in equity used to conclude, to the effect that a writ of subpoena might issue against the defendant to compel him to answer upon oath all the matters charged against him in the bill. (Black’s Law 1st)

(Note: The word pray was used in court until recently instead of the word plead. When one falls on ones knees and makes a pleading to the lord of the courtroom (the judge) for a lenient judgement, this was called praying to the court (lord).)

Atonement – n. 1. Agreement; concord; reconciliation, after enmity or controversy. Romans 5:11. 2. Expiation; satisfaction or reparation made by giving an equivalent for an injury, or by doing or suffering that which is received in satisfaction for an offense or injury; with for. When a man has been guilty of any vice, the best atonement he can make for it is, to warn others not to fall into the like. 3. In theology, the expiation of sin made by the obedience and personal sufferings of Christ.

Expiation  n. [Latin expiatio.] The act of atoning for a crime; the act of making satisfaction for an offense, by which the guilt is done away, and the obligation of the offended person to punish the crime is canceled; atonement; satisfaction. Among pagans and Jews, expiation was made chiefly by sacrifices, or washings and purification. Among Christians, expiation for the sins of men is usually considered as made only by the obedience and sufferings of Christ. 1. The means by which atonement for crimes is made; atonement; as sacrifices and purification among heathens, and the obedience and death of Christ among Christians.

(Note: Accepting and declaring the grace of God is the legal remedy for atonement of the sins of the person. A man can have no obligations to the State unless he continues to claim and stand in his or her artificial person. Did I mention this is not religion?)

Grace – n. [Latin gratia, which is formed on the Celtic; Eng. agree, congruous, and ready. The primary sense of gratus, is free, ready, quick, willing, prompt, from advancing.] 1. Favor; good will; kindness; disposition to oblige another; as a grant made as an act of grace 2. Appropriately, the free unmerited love and favor of God, the spring and source of all the benefits men receive from him. And if by grace then it is no more of works. Romans 11:5. 3. Favorable influence of God; divine influence or the influence of the spirit, in renewing the heart and restraining from sin. My grace is sufficient for thee. 2 Corinthians 12:9. 4. The application of Christ’s righteousness to the sinner. Where sin abounded, grace did much more abound. Romans 5:2. 5. A state of reconciliation to God. Romans 5:2:2. 9. Eternal life; final salvation. 1 Peter 1:13. 10. Favor; mercy; pardon. Bow and sue for grace With suppliant knee. 11. Favor conferred. 12. Privilege. 14. Natural or acquired excellence; any endowment that recommends the possessor to others; as the graces of wit and learning. 18. The title of a duke or an archbishop, and formerly of the king of England, meaning your goodness or clemency. His grace the Duke of York. Your grace will please to accept my thanks. 19. A short prayer before or after meat; a blessing asked, or thanks rendered.Day in grace in theology, time of probation, when an offer is made to sinners. Days in grace in commerce, the days immediately following the day when a bill or note becomes due, which days are allowed to the debtor or payor to make payment in. In Great Britain and the United States the days of grace are three, but in other countries more; the usages of merchants being different. –v.t. To adorn; to decorate; to embellish and dignify. 1. To dignify or raise by act of favor; to honor. He might at his pleasure grace or disgrace whom he would in court. 3. To supply with heavenly grace.

Disgrace – n. [dis and grace.] 1. A state of being out of favor; disfavor; disesteem; as, the minister retired from court in disgrace 2. State of ignominy; dishonor; shame. 3. Cause of shame; as, to turn the back to the enemy is a foul disgrace; every vice is a disgrace to a rational being.

(Note: This again leaves us with a choice: Do you prefer the grace of God in nature or the disgrace of a man in demonic robe and status who claims to be god on Earth? Who or what do you want to be the judge of your actions? To what do you wish to be responsible to, God and nature or to men who claim to be of higher authority than God? Hint: only a psychopath claims to be a god or act criminally against nature in God’s name… A man supplied with “Heavenly Grace” needs not pretend grace (shame) and lives life eternally here on Earth. A man without God’s grace in legal form must suffer man’s shame, judgement, and wrath in hell on earth as an eternal debt-slave.)

Enmity – n. 1. The quality of being an enemy; the opposite of friendship; ill will; hatred; unfriendly dispositions; malevolence. It expresses more than aversion and less than malice, and differs from displeasure in denoting a fixed or rooted hatred, whereas displeasure is more transient. I will put enmity between thee and the woman. Genesis 3:15. The carnal mind is enmity against God.Romans 8:7. 2. A state of opposition. The friendship of the world is enmity with God. James 4:4.

(Note: Friendship of the world refers to accepting dead/artificial things as persons created by men to have authority over nature and God. It is also referred to in the Bible as the “respecting of persons”. A person is an enemy (in enmity) of God, by simply being opposed to (not created by) nature and its laws.)

Son – n. 2. A male descendant, however distant; hence in the plural, sons signifies descendants in general, a sense much used in the Scriptures. The whole human race are styled sons of Adam. 4. A native or inhabitant of a country; as the sons of Britain. Let our country never be ashamed of her sons. 5. The produce of any thing. Earth’s tall sons, the cedar, oak and pine. [Note. The primary sense of child is produce, issue; a shoot.] 6. One adopted into a family. Moses was the son of Pharaoh’s daughter. Exodus 2:2. 7. One who is converted by another’s instrumentality, is called his son; also, one educated by another; as the sons of the prophets. 8. Christ is called the son of God, as being conceived by the power of the Holy Spirit, or in consequence of his relation to the Father.

(Note: To be a son of God is to be an instrument of God. Instrument is a legal term. You are born a man (son of God) and then converted into a financial instrument through the attaching of a surname on a birth certificate into an artificial state of being a person. To find grace and salvation (remedy) to that artificial state in law, it requires you to to be re-converted back into nature – thus we say a person must abandon his person by “converting to Christianity”.)

GOD – n. 1. The Supreme Being; Jehovah; the eternal and infinite spirit, the creator, and the sovereign of the universe. GOD is a spirit; and they that worship him, must worship him in spirit and in truth. John 4:24. 2. A false god; a heathen deity;an idol. Fear not the gods of the Amorites. Judges 6:10. 3. A prince; a ruler; a magistrate or judge; an angel. Thou shalt not revile the gods, nor curse the ruler of thy people. Exodus 22:28. Psalms 97:7. 4. Any person or thing exalted too much in estimation, or deified and honored as the chief good. Whose god is their belly. Philippians 3:19.

(Note: Do not honor or respect persons as gods. The majority of the mention of the word “god”, “gods”, and “lord” in the Bible is referring to persons (Kings and Priests as vicars), not to GOD (Supreme Being/Creator). This must be understood to comprehend how and why the Bible tells two stories (God and false “temporal” god) and describes two paths, one of God and one of mammon. For instance it was the King’s (god’s) will that blood sacrifices be made to God, not GOD/creators will. Nature requires no such idolatry and no ceremony under the path of Christianity, for the sacrifice/crucifixion was already allegorically made in order to satisfy the law of men acting as gods who demanded sacrifices of blood. Again, literal or fundamental translation to this story will get you nowhere in life, and will continue to hide the allegorical brilliance of the Bible as a remedy to man’s claim of being authority over God and other men. You do not need to prove that Plato’s Cave actually existed in his Allegory of the Cave to be able to apply it’s lessons in real life. Robin Hood and King Arthur need not be anything but fictional characters and yet still their stories teach men. Why then cannot one learn from and utilize the Bible without the need for proof of its allegory?)

Mammon – n. Riches; wealth; or the god or riches. Ye cannot serve God and mammon. Matthew 6:24.

(Note: In this definition the distinction is made between God capitalized and god un-capitalized. Little god is man acting in the stead of God, claiming to be god, which is also known as idolatry. The god of riches is government and corporate church of course, for it creates money and is mammon.)

Vicar – n. [Latin vicarius, from vicis, a turn, or its root.] 1. In a general sense, a person deputed or authorized to perform the functions of another; a substitute in office. The pope pretends to be vicar of Jesus Christ on earth. He has under him a grand vicar who is a cardinal, and whose jurisdiction extends over all priests, regular and secular. 2. In the canon law, the priest of a parish, the predial tithes of which are impropriated or appropriated, that is, belong to a chapter or religious house, or to a layman, who receives them, and only allows the vicar the smaller tithes or a salary. Apostolical vicars, are those who perform the functions of the pope in churches or provinces committed to their direction.

Authorized –  participle passive, Warranted by right; supported by authority; derived from legal or proper authority; having power or authority.

(Note: By having the title of “Authorized Version”, the 1611 King James Bible is literally the “legal authority” of the legal law of men (mammon). We don’t read the King James because it is a “good translation” or more easily understandable, but rather because it is the book that the current legal law is based upon. Other translations are irrelevant for legal purposes. You must not look for an easy to read translation, for that will be a work of mere fiction, and we are reading the Bible to find the legal remedy to invoke Christ as remedy. You must learn the language of the authorized version so as to understand what authority is – which is the legal language of the vicar of Christ. Remember, this translation is of the King (god), of the government (god), and is the evidence (testament) of law that all right and authority is claimed by the “vicar”. In God We Trust…)

Idolatry – n. [Latin idololatria. Gr. idol, and to worship or serve.] 1. The worship of idols, images, or any thing made by hands (of man/unnatural), or which is not God (of and found in nature). Idolatry is of two kinds; the worship of images, statues, pictures, etc. made by hands; and the worship of the heavenly bodies, the sun, moon and stars, or of demons, angels, men and animals. 2. Excessive attachment or veneration for any thing, or that which borders on adoration.

(Note: There is no image of God, for man cannot perceive God. Look around you and worship the creation of God, for that is the closest you will ever get to perceiving God. And more importantly, worship all men (respect their rights) who are Sons of God (I AM) in total equality, so that no man may ever have an artificial status (person) above any other. This is called peace.)

Peace – n.[Latin pax, paco, to appease.] 1. In a general sense, a state of quiet or tranquillity; freedom from disturbance or agitation; applicable to society, to individuals, or to the temper of the mind. 2. Freedom from war with a foreign nation; public quiet. 3. Freedom from internal commotion or civil war. 4. Freedom from private quarrels, suits or disturbance. 5. Freedom from agitation or disturbance by the passions, as from fear, terror, anger, anxiety or the like; quietness of mind; tranquillity; calmness; quiet of conscience. Great peace have they that love the (natural) law. Psalms 119:165. 7. Harmony; concord; a state of reconciliation between parties at variance. 8. Public tranquillity; that quiet, order and security which is guaranteed by the laws; as, to keep the peace; to break the peace. This word is used in commanding silence or quiet; as, peace to this troubled soul. To be at peace to be reconciled; to live in harmony. To make peace to reconcile, as parties at variance. To hold the peace to be silent; to suppress one’s thoughts; not to speak.

Reconciliation – noun [Latin reconciliatio.] 1. The act of reconciling parties at variance; renewal of friendship after disagreement or enmity. Reconciliation and friendship with God, really form the basis of all rational and true enjoyment. 2. In Scripture, the means by which sinners are reconciled and brought into a state of favor with God, after natural estrangement or enmity; the atonement; expiation. Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression and to make an end of sin, and to make reconciliation for iniquity. Daniel 9:24. Hebrews 2:17. 3. Agreement of things seemingly opposite, different or inconsistent.

(Note: A man cannot reconcile with government his desire to be free of its person without making atonement to nature and thus showing favor of God as highest authority to government. You will be governed by men until you can prove and legally declare a higher God, and thus live in peace, for the meek shall inherit the world.)

Converted – p.p. Turned or changed from one substance or state to another; turned form one religion or sect to another; changed from a state of sin to a state of holiness; applied to a particular use; appropriated.

Meek, a [Latin mucus; Eng. mucilage; Heb. to melt.] 1. Mild of temper; soft; gentle; not easily provoked or irritated; yielding; given to forbearance under injuries. Now the man Moses was very meek above all men. Numbers 12:3. 2. Appropriately, humble, in an evangelical sense; submissive to the divine will; not proud, self-sufficient or refractory; not peevish and apt to complain of divine dispensations. Christ says, ‘Learn of me, for I am meek and lowly in heart, and ye shall find rest to your souls.’ Matthew 11:29. Blessed are the meek for they shall inherit the earth. Matthew 5:5.

(Note: Persons may not inherit the Earth, for they are not natural as the Earth is. Only men who are meek, self-sufficient without government, and who pay for injuries caused to other natural things and beings as responsible for their own actions shall be allowed by governments to inherit the Earth without being governed by men.)

Inherit – v. t. [Latin hoeres, an heir. See Heir.] 1. To take by descent from an ancestor; to take by succession, as the representative of the former possessor; to receive, as a right or title descendible by law from an ancestor at his decease. The heir inherits the lands or real estate of his father; the eldest son of the nobleman inherits his father’s title, and the eldest son of a king inherits the crown. 2. To receive by nature from a progenitor. The son inherits the virtues of his father; the daughter inherits the temper of her mother, and children often inherit the constitutional infirmities of their parents. 3. To possess; to enjoy; to take as a possession, by gift or divine appropriation; as, to inherit everlasting life; to inherit the promises. –That thou mayest live, and inherit the land which Jehovah thy God giveth thee. Deuteronomy 16:20. The meek shall inherit the earth. Matthew 5:5.

(Note: Maturity of thought creates the realization that no man may own the property (creation) of God. The creator of the Earth (a higher law) was the first progenitor, and only the men who are Sons of God may inherit that land – with merely the responsibility to keep and protect it as caretaker (dominion) but never to claim demonic possession of it through fictional title of property (corporate person). Persons being not of God, can only thus inherit a fictional paper title also not of God, which is unnatural and not the soil of the land itself (of the creator). The meek shall inherit the whole Earth, not incorporated plots (parts) of it. If this sounds like an impossible disposition for men, which is perfectly understandable considering today’s society, we must remember the most important rule of Christianity – DO NO HARM. To do no harm means also to respect the duty to never harm natural rights of all other men. Peace may never be on Earth (in heaven) without this duty being always upheld. I, for one, am not confident this pipe-dream can ever become reality among men, I am only deciphering the code so that if it is possible, men of God may have a fighting chance at peace and harmony – at heaven on Earth. I do claim to know that the way things are today requires war, occupation, and crimes against nature, and thus will never end in peace and quiet, for it is literally hell on Earth.)

Quiet – a. Unmolested ; tranquil; free from interference or disturbance. – v. To pacify; to render secure or unassailable by the removal of disquieting causes or disputes. This is the meaning of the word in the phrase “action to quiet title”, which is a proceeding to establish the plaintiff’s title to land by bringing into court an adverse claimant and there compelling QUIET.

Quiet Title – a suit brought about to obtain a determination as to the title of a certain piece of property.

Title Quiet – used to describe a suit in a court of equity that will settle all claims of rightful ownership.

Peace and Quiet – a term referring to a right to security, freedom and tranquility as is guaranteed by the law.

(Note: Only the quieting of persons and destruction of titles (status) can peace happen. Peace and legal quiet go hand in hand.)

Attachment n.1. A taking of the person, goods or estate by a writ or precept in a civil action, to secure a debt or demand. 2. A writ directing the person or estate of a person to be taken, to secure his appearance before a court. 3. Close adherence or affection; fidelity; regard; any passion or affection that binds a person; as, an attachment to a friend, or to a party.

Fidelityn. [Latin fidelitas, from fides, faith, fido, to trust. See Faith.] 1. Faithfulness; careful and exact observance of duty, or performance of obligations. We expect fidelity in a public minister, in an agent or trustee, in a domestic servant, in a friend. The best security for the fidelity of men, is to make interest coincide with duty. 2. Firm adherence to a person or party with which one is united, or to which one is bound; loyalty; as the fidelity of subjects to their king or government; the fidelity of a tenant or liege to his lord. 3. Observance of the marriage covenant; as the fidelity of a husband or wife. 4. Honesty; veracity; adherence to truth; as the fidelity of a witness.

Faith. 1. Confidence; credit; reliance. Thus, an act may be said to be done “on the faith” of certain representations. 2. Belief; credence; trust. Thus, the constitution provides that “full faith and credit” shall be given to the judgments of each state in the courts of the others. 3. Purpose; intent; sincerity; state of knowledge or design. This is the meaning of the word in the phrases “good faith” and “bad faith.” (Black’s Law 1st)

(Note: In government, a person is under an agreement of faith as a financial instrument, which has nothing to do with a belief in God. It is a bond of insurance or pledge to church and government, not God.)

Faithn. [Latin fides, fido, to trust; Gr. to persuade, to draw towards any thing, to conciliate; to believe, to obey. In the Greek Lexicon of Hederic it is said, the primitive signification of the verb is to bind and draw or lead, as signifies a rope or cable. But this remark is a little incorrect. The sense of the verb, from which that of rope and binding is derived, is to strain, to draw, and thus to bind or make fast. A rope or cable is that which makes fast. Heb.] 1. Belief; the assent of the mind to the truth of what is declared by another, resting on his authority and veracity, without other evidence; the judgment that what another states or testifies is the truth2. The assent of the mind to the truth of a proposition advanced by another; belief, or probable evidence of any kind. 3. In theology, the assent of the mind or understanding to the truth of what God has revealed. Simple belief of the scriptures, of the being and perfections of God, and of the existence, character and doctrines of Christ, founded on the testimony of the sacred writers, is called historical or speculative faith; a faith little distinguished from the belief of the existence and achievements of Alexander or of Cesar. 4. Evangelical, justifying, or saving faith is the assent of the mind to the truth of divine revelation, on the authority of God’s testimony, accompanied with a cordial assent of the will or approbation of the heart; an entire confidence or trust in God’s character and declarations, and in the character and doctrines of Christ, with an unreserved surrender of the will to his guidance, and dependence on his merits for salvation. In other words, that firm belief of God’s testimony, and of the truth of the gospel, which influences the will, and leads to an entire reliance on Christ for salvation. Being justified by faith Romans 5:1. Without faith it is impossible to please God. Hebrews 11:1. For we walk by faith and not by sight. 2 Corinthians 5:7. The faith of the gospel is that emotion of the mind, which is called trust or confidence, exercised towards the moral character of God, and particularly of the Savior. Faith is an affectionate practical confidence in the testimony of God. Faith is a firm, cordial belief in the veracity of God, in all the declarations of his word; or a full and affectionate confidence in the certainty of those things which God has declared, and because he has declared them. 5. The object of belief; a doctrine or system of doctrines believed; a system of revealed truths received by christians. 7. An open profession of gospel truth. 8. A persuasion or belief of the lawfulness of things indifferent. Hast thou faith? Have it to thyself before God. Rom 14. 9. Faithfulness; fidelity; a strict adherence to duty and fulfillment of promises. 10. Word or honor pledged; promise given; fidelity. 11. Sincerity; honesty; veracity; faithfulness. We ought in good faith to fulfill all our engagements. 12. Credibility or truth.

(Note: Whatever your claim of religion as a person, you automatically have faith in government as a person over God. Putting your faith in God simply means placing your whole self into the realm of nature under that law instead of man’s. You are putting faith in the teachings of the Bible through the “character” of Christ, not in the notion that Christ lived or did not live. Logic and reason must prevail here, or religion will form from even your own self-created doctrine. Plato’s Cave and the characters called slaves need not be proven to have lived in reality for the faith in its veracity of knowledge to be true. Do not allow religious thought to cloud your judgement or to demonize the Bible as just religion. You believe, put faith in, and obey the U.S. CODE, knowing it is merely the fiction of men. Why can you not therefore believe, put faith in, and obey the words of the Christ character to escape that U.S. CODE and be free?)

Respect, v. t. [Latin respecto, or respectus, from respicio; re and specio, to view.] 1. To regard; to have regard to in design or purpose. 2. To have regard to, in relation or connection; to relate to. The treaty particularly respects our commerce. 3. To view or consider with some degree of reverence; to esteem as if possessed of real worthTo respect the person, to suffer the opinion or judgment, to be influenced or biased by a regard to the outward circumstances of a person, to the prejudice of right and equity. Thou shalt not respect the person of the poor. Leviticus 19:15. Neither doth God (nature) respect any person (artificial thing). 2 Samuel 14:14. –  n. [Latin respectus.] 5. Partial regard; undue bias to the prejudice of justice; as the phrase, respect of persons. 1 Peter 1:17. James 2:1. Proverbs 24:23. 6. Respected character; as persons of the best respect in Rome. 7. Consideration; motive in reference to something.

Character/Characteristica. That constitutes the character; that marks the peculiar, distinctive qualities of a person or thing. – n. 1. That which constitutes a character; that which characterizes; that which distinguishes a person or thing from another.

(Note: The character of persons is distinguished by the name and surname, and by the number assigned to that unnatural combination. You might call the Social Security number the number and mark of the Beast. A man with no surname or number is indistinguishable in mans’ law, for he has no prescribed legal character and no corporate or artificial characteristics.)

Person, noun per’sn. [Latin persona; said to be compounded of per, through or by, and sonus, sound; a Latin word signifying primarily a mask used by actors on the state.] 1. An individual human being consisting of body and soul. We apply the word to living beings only, possessed of a rational nature; the body when dead is not called a person. It is applied alike to a man, woman or child. A person is a thinking intelligent being. 2. A man, woman or child, considered as opposed to things, or distinct from them. 3. A human being, considered with respect to the living body or corporeal existence only. The form of her person is elegant. 4. A human being, indefinitely; one; a man. Let a person’s attainments be never so great, he should remember he is frail and imperfect. 5. A human being represented in dialogue, fiction, or on the state; character. A player appears in the person of king Lear. 6. Character of office. How different is the same man from himself, as he sustains the person of a magistrate and that of a friend. 7. In grammar, the nominative to a verb; the agent that performs or the patient that suffers any thing affirmed by a verb8. In law, an artificial person is a corporation or body politic. In person by one’s self; with bodily presence; not be representative. The king in person visits all around. –  v. t. To represent as a person; to make to resemble; to image.

(Note: The word person takes up many pages in law to describe. It can be used in nature and in fiction. But be clear that always in law and legal settings, a person is but a legal fiction and artificial. Thus, when speaking of man’s law, it can only recognize men if the respect the person assigned to them by government. The legal realm only deals with men when they possess a demon in impersonation of that fictional character. God protects men under the laws of nature only if they are not in possession and surety of a demon.)

Impersonatev. t. To personify.

Personify – v. t. [Latin persona and facio.] To give animation to inanimate objects; to ascribe to an inanimate being the sentiments, actions or language of a rational being or person, or to represent an inanimate being with the affections and actions of a person. Thus we say, the plants thirst for rain. The trees said to the fig-tree, come thou, and reign over us. Judges 9:1.

Ascribe, v. t. [Latin ascribo, of ad and scribo, to write.] 1. To attribute, impute, or set to, as to a cause; to assign, as effect to a cause; as, losses are often to be ascribed to imprudence. 2. To attribute, as a quality, or an appurtenance; to consider or allege to belong; as, to ascribe perfection to God, or imperfection to man. Job 36:3. Psalms 68:34. 1 Samuel 18:8.

Attributev.t. [Latin attribuo; ad and tribuo, to divide, to bestow, to assign; tribus, a tribe, division or ward. See Tribe.] 1. To allot or attach, in contemplation; to ascribe; to consider as belonging. We attribute nothing to God, that contains a contradiction. 2. To give as due; to yield as an act of the mind; as, to attribute to God all the glory of redemption. 3. To impute, as to a cause; as, our misfortunes are generally to be attributed to our follies or imprudence. – n. 1. That which is attributed; that which is considered as belonging to, or inherent in; as, power and wisdom are attributes of the Supreme Being; or a quality determining something to be after a certain manner; as, extension is an attribute of body. 2. Quality; characteristic disposition; as bravery and generosity in men. 3. A thing belonging to another; an appendant; as the arms of a warrior. In painting and sculpture, a symbol of office or character, added to the principal figure; as a club is the attribute of Hercules. 4. Reputation; honor.

(Note: An artificial person is an attribute of government granted to a man. It is a title. The person does not belong to you, and therefore every action taken in person and everything purchased in person and everything accomplished in life in person belongs to the owner of that person, which is government. Thus everything you have in person can be taken by government, from property to freedom. Remember, a person has no unalienable rights in nature, for a person is not of nature; not created by God and not under God’s authority and jurisdiction. All conglomerate corporations for profit or not are also property of government, as they are property of a person, not a man. The man incorporates in person, thus the corporation is fiction of government and thus government acts as god over that corporation (person).)

Appurtenance – n. So written for appurtenance. See Appertain.] That which belongs to something else; an adjunct; an appendage. Appropriately, such buildings, rights and improvements, as belong to land, are called the appurtenances; as small buildings are the appurtenances of a mansion.

Adjunct – n. [Latin adjunctus, joined, from adjungo. See join.] 1. Something added to another, but not essentially a part of it; as, water absorbed by a cloth or sponge is its adjunct. Also a person joined to another.  –  a. Added to or united with, as an adjunct professor.

(Note: A man is joined under legal law to a person through what is known as a surety. It is the goal of a man in becoming a “Christian” to abandon such an artificial joinder and to instead be a surety to Christ, being then bound by the laws of nature (God).)

Surety, n. Certainty; indubitableness. Know of a surety that thy seed shall be a stranger in a land that is not theirs Genesis 15:13. 1. Security; safety. 2. Foundation of stability; support. 3. Evidence; ratification; confirmation. 4. Security against loss or damage; security for payment. 5. In law, one that is bound with and for another; one who enters into a bond or recognizance to answer for another’s appearance in court, or for his payment of a debt or for the performance of some act, and who, in case of the principal debtor’s failure, is compellable to pay the debt or damages; a bondsman; a bail. He that is surety for a stranger, shall smart for it. Proverbs 11:15. 6. In Scripture, Christ is called ‘the surety of a better testament.’ Hebrews 7:22. He undertook to make atonement for the sins of men, and thus prepare the way to deliver them from the punishment to which they had rendered themselves liable. 7. A hostage.

(Note: One of the most important legal terms in both realms, a surety-ship is comparable to the shackles of a slave. Being attached through surety to an artificial person is like carrying around a ventriloquist’s doll, where the doll pulls your strings and speaks for you in law. The purpose of the action of surety is literally the bondage of man to a person. It is an insurance policy insuring that government’s property (the person) is not damaged, and creating a pact that the man shall pay the debts of the person. The remedy to this enslavement through bonded indebtedness to government is the act of abandoning the usage of that person and literally becoming a slave to the will and testament of God, through the legal concept of Christ Jesus. Faith and belief are thus removed from government and placed in God, and man is now bonded with Christ in redemption, no longer a slave in the legal fiction realm, abjuring to the laws of nature as his or her only true jurisdiction in law. This is an actual legal process, not to be mistaken with mere religions thought or doctrine. It involves all of the legal concepts discussed here, correctly applied within the authorized legal testament (evidence) of law of kings. In other words, this is the only authorized remedy by kings and governments, for only the usurpation of their claimed authority as vicar (replacement) of God on temporal/corporal Earth can legally be considered and recognized by that authority of man as remedy to that legal claim.)

Believern. One who believes; one who gives credit to other evidence than that of personal knowledge. 1. In theology, one who gives credit to the truth of the scriptures, as a revelation from God. In a more restricted sense, a professor of christianity; one who receives the gospel, as unfolding the true way of salvation, and Christ, as his Savior.

(Note: This word believer is very important. No other word creates more tension than this one by religious persons among non-religious men. But please understand that belief in anything is not a requirement in a religious or doctrinal way. Instead, this word legally signifies “use” with “confidence” as evidence of law under God and not man. To “receive” the gospel is to accept the Christian remedy in law in order to abandon man’s law of mammon. Belief is more easily understood here as confidence or trust. It is the state of being by one in receivership of God’s authority over man.)

Receive – v.t. [Latin recipio; re and capio, to take.] 1. To take, as a thing offered or sent; to accept. He had the offer of a donation, but he would not receive it. 2. To take as due or as a reward. He received the money on the day it was payable. He received ample compensation. 3. To take or obtain from another in any manner, and either good or evil. Shall we receive good at the hand of God, and shall we not receive evil? Job 2:105. To take or obtain intellectually; as, to receive an opinion or notion from others. 6. To embrace. Receive with meekness the engrafted word. James 1:7. 7. To allow; to hold; to retain; as a custom long received. 8. To admit. Thou shalt guide me with thy counsel, and afterward receive me to glory. Psalms 73:24. 9. To welcome; to lodge and entertain; as a guest. 10. To admit into membership or fellowship. Him that is weak in the faith, receive ye. Romans 14:1. 11. To take in or on; to hold; to contain. 12. To be endowed with. Ye shall receive power after that the Holy Spirit has come upon you. Acts 1:8. 13. To take into a place or state. After the Lord had spoken to them, he was received up into heaven. Mark 16:19. 14. To take or have as something ascribed; as, to receive praise or blame. Revelation 4:11. Revelation 5:12. 15. To bear with or suffer. 2 Corinthians 11:4. 16. To believe in. John 1:11. 17. To accept or admit officially or in an official character. The minister was received by the emperor or court. 18. To take stolen goods from a thief, knowing them to be stolen.

Reciever – n. 1. One who takes or receives in any manner. 2. An officer appointed to receive public money; a treasurer. 3. One who takes stolen goods from a thief, knowing them to be stolen, and incurs the guilt of partaking in the crime (i.e. sin). 4. A vessel for receiving and containing the product of distillation. 5. The vessel of an air pump, for containing the thing on which an experiment is to be made. 6. One who partakes of the sacrament (oath).

(Note: In law, the human body is considered a fleshly vessel that carries the soul. Upon that body is placed in surety a person. This requires voluntary receipt of that demon in possession and use. Is it so hard to accept grace as remedy of God in renunciation of government’s person when all of your life you’ve accepted and embraced the artificial fiction of government in its stead? Would it harm your ego so badly to accept the endowment of Christ as your Lord and Savior, even as you now accept government as your god, if it meant being free of bonded debt-slavery? Still think we are talking about religion here, oh foolish one? The ego is the devils prize, for it prevents good men from shining true to their natural character. And religion is the devil’s (man’s) tool to prevent ego death and thus the peace and natural liberty of mankind. And so man remains in hell as long as he lives on Earth, all the time avoiding the heaven it could be.)

Confidence – n. [Latin See Confide.] 1. A trusting, or reliance; an assurance of mind or firm belief in the integrity, stability or veracity of another (either God or mammon), or in the truth and reality of a fact. It is better to trust in the Lord, than to put confidence in man. Psalms 118:8. I rejoice that I have confidence in you in all things. 2 Corinthians 7:16. Mutual confidence is the basis of social happiness. I place confidence in a statement, or in an official report. 2. Trust; reliance; applied to one’s own abilities, or fortune; belief in one’s own competency. 3. That in which trust is placed; ground of trust; he or that which supports. Jehovah shall be thy confidence Proverbs 3:26. 4. Safety, or assurance of safety; security. 5. Boldness; courage. Preaching the kingdom of God with all confidence Acts 28:31.

(Note: Is government a fact, a truth, and a reality? Do you trust in it? Do you freely place your confidence in it? Is your faith in it? Isn’t insanity really defined as putting your faith in men (government) over and over and expecting different results? Do you understand now that faith, trust, and confidence are all legally BINDING terms?)

Testament – n. [Latin testamentum, from testor, to make a will.] 1. A solemn authentic instrument in writing, by which a person declares his will as to the disposal of his estate and effects after his death. This is otherwise called a will. A testament to be valid, must be made when the testator is of sound mind, and it must be subscribed, witnessed and published in such manner as the law prescribes. 2. The name of each general division of the canonical books of the sacred Scriptures; as the Old Testament; the New testament. The name is equivalent to covenant, and in our use of it, we apply it to the books which contain the old and new dispensations; that of Moses, and that of Jesus Christ. In the primitive church, those who had been instructed in the truths of the gospel and baptized, were called believers; in distinction from the catechumens, who were under instruction, as preparatory to baptism and admission to church privileges. Synonym = evidence.

Witness – n. 1. Testimony; attestation of a fact or event. If I bear witness of myself, my witness is not true. John 5:31. 2. That which furnishes evidence or proof3. A person who knows or sees any thing; one personally present; as, he was witness; he was an eye-witness. 1 Peter 5:1. 4. One who sees the execution of an instrument, and subscribes it for the purpose of confirming its authenticity b his testimony. 5. One who gives testimony; as, the witnesses in court agreed in all essential facts. – v.t. 1. To see or know by personal presence… 2. To attest; to give testimony to; to testify to something. Behold, how many things they witness against thee. Mark 15:4. 3. To see the execution of an instrument, and subscribe it for the purpose of establishing its authenticity; as, to witness a bond or a deed. – v.i. 1. To bear testimony. 2. To give evidence.

(Note: The popular religions term to “be a witness for Christ” is yet another misapplied legal action by misleading or mislead religious corporations. To witness for Christ is to legally attest that your law is under God through His remedy called Christ Jesus. Doing so in a religious setting has no weight in law. Witnessing, however, in court of law or in a legal declaration overrules man’s law, with Christ as your witness. This is the presentation of evidence of God’s law which exempts man from the law of man and mammon. Without a witness, there be no crime. A person may not use Christ as a witness, for a person is not known to God. Only a man who abandons the surname and benefits of person-hood may use the Bible and the character of Christ as witness and evidence of law above that of man. There can be no uncertainty in your faith and belief – your slavery to Christ as Lord.)

Certainty – n. 1. A fixed or real state; truth; fact. 2. Full assurance of mind; exemption from doubt… perception of the agreement or disagreement of our ideas. 3. Exemption from failure; as the certainty of an event, or of the success of a medicine. The certainty of punishment is the truest security against crimes. 4. Regularity; settled state.

(Note: It’s your choice… your state of being is either real or fiction. Are you certain you can prove you are only a human being without a another state?)

Exemption – n. The act of exempting; the state of being exempt. 1. Freedom from any service, charge, burden, tax, evil or requisition, to which others are subject; immunity; privilege. No man can claim an exemption from pain, sorrow or death.

(Note: A fictional person may never be exempt from government, for the person is property of government and subject to all its (creator’s) laws. Government is the author of that fictional character in its fictional tale. The only true exemption, redemption, and remedy happens within the real, and is declared with abandonment of the false.)

Evil – n. Evil is natural or moral. Natural evil is any thing which produces pain, distress, loss or calamity, or which in any way disturbs the peace, impairs the happiness, or destroys the perfection of natural beings. Moral evil is any deviation of a moral agent from the rules of conduct prescribed to him by God, or by legitimate human authority; or it is any violation of the plain principles of justice and rectitude. There are also evils called civil, which affect injuriously the peace or prosperity of a city or state; and political evils, which injure a nation, in its public capacity. All wickedness, all crimes, all violations of law and right are moral evils. Diseases are natural evils, but they often proceed from moral evils. 2. Misfortune; mischief; injury. There shall no evil befall thee. Psalms 91:10. A prudent man foreseeth the evil and hideth himself. Proverbs 22:3. 3. Depravity; corruption of heart, or disposition to commit wickedness; malignity. The heart of the sons of men is full of evil Ecclesiastes 9:3. 4. Malady; as the king’s evil or scrophula. – adv. [generally contracted to ill.] 1. Not well; not with justice or propriety; unsuitable. Evil it beseems thee. 2. Not virtuously;not innocently4. Injuriously; not kindly. The Egyptians evil entreated us, and afflicted us. In composition, evil denoting something bad or wrong, is often contracted to ill.

(Note: In a word, evil is described as “against government”. By assuming the persona of artificiality or fiction, government gives license to commit ill deeds that injure others, as a license to kill. No such license exists in natural law or under God, except in defense of life and the natural realm. License is permission by “god” the government to commit an illegal and/or immoral act. But remember, government also considers true Christianity to be amoral and sin against government. False gods do not like loosing slaves. Ironically, it is the goal of the Christian to become illegal in the eyes of government law, meaning not approved or created by that law. Disturbing the three great natural unalienable rights of life, liberty (peace) and happiness is a natural evil caused by political authority, and is a done deal once citizenship is accepted over God’s grace.)

Moral – n. Morality; the doctrine or practice of the duties of life. 1. The doctrine inculcated by a fiction; the accommodation of a fable to form the morals.

Fable – n. [Latin , Gr. The radical sense is that which is spoken or told.] 1. A feigned story or tale, intended to instruct or amuse; a fictitious narration intended to enforce some useful truth or precept. 2. Fiction in general; as, the story is all a fable. 3. An idle story; vicious or vulgar fictions. But refuse profane and old wives fables. 1 Timothy 4:7. 5. Falsehood; a softer term for a lie. – v.t. To feign; to invent; to devise and speak of, as true or real. The hell thou fablest.

(Note: The Bible is a moral fable “true or real” that is “intended to instruct” and “intended to enforce some useful truth or precept”.

Reala. [Low Latin realis. The Latin res and Eng. thing coincide exactly with the Heb. a word, a thing, an event. See Read and Thing.] 1. Actually being or existing; not fictitious or imaginary; as a description of real life. The author describes a real scene or transaction. 2. True; genuine; not artificial, not counterfeit or factitious; as real Madeira wine; real ginger. 3. True; genuine; not affected; not assumed. The woman appears in her real character. 4. Relating to things, not to persons; not personal. 5. In law, pertaining to things fixed, permanent or immovable, as to lands and tenements; as real estate, opposed to personal or movable property.

(Note: Real means artificial in civil law, referring to title or status. Many words in legalese have opposite meanings from their conversational (non-legal) usage. In understanding the Bible and its remedy, we must understand the legal meaning, not what the corporate church preaches. The gods of religious doctrine are also “real” in concept, in that these gods are created on paper and don’t exist in nature.)

Covenant – n. [L, to come; a coming together; a meeting or agreement of minds.] 1. A mutual consent or agreement of two or more persons, to do or to forbear some act or thing; a contract; stipulation. A covenant is created by deed in writing, sealed and executed; or it may be implied in the contract. 2. A writing containing the terms of agreement or contract between parties; or the clause of agreement in a deed containing the covenant. 3. In theology, the covenant of works, is that implied in the commands, prohibitions, and promises of God; the promise of God to man, that mans perfect obedience should entitle him to happiness. The covenant of redemption, is the mutual agreement between the Father and Son, respecting the redemption of sinners by Christ. The covenant of grace, is that by which God engages to bestow salvation on man, upon the condition that man shall believe in Christ and yield obedience to the terms of the gospel. 4. In church affairs, a solemn agreement between the members of a church, that they will walk together according to the precepts of the gospel, in brotherly affection. – v. i. To enter into a formal agreement; to stipulate; to bind ones self by contract.

Covenant – In practice. The name of a common-law form of action ex contractu, which lies for the recovery of damages for breach of a covenant, or contract under seal. In the law of contracts. An agreement, convention, or promise of two or more parties, by deed in writing, signed, sealed, and delivered, by which either of the parties pledges himself to the other that something is either done or shall be done, or stipulates for the truth of certain facts. An agreement between two or more parties, reduced to writing and executed by sealing and delivery thereof, whereby some of the parties named therein engage, or one of them engages, with the other, or others, or some of them, therein also named, that some act hath or hath not already been done, or for the performance or non-performance of some specified duty. A promise by deed. (Black’s Law 1st)

‘Ark, n. [Latin arca.] 1. A small close vessel, chest or coffer, such as that which was the repository of the tablets of the covenant among the Jews… 3. A depository. Arise, O Lord, into thy rest, thou and the ark of thy strength. Psalms 132:8.

Depository – n. A place where any thing is lodged for safe-keeping. A warehouse is a depository for goods; a clerks office, for records.

(Note: There is no mystery as to what the “ark of the covenant” was. It was a bank depository – a safe-deposit box – used by the same money-changers that enslave us in debt today! It was not Christian; not of God; but of the corporate church. Today the U.S. Government’s ark holds the Birth Certificates printed on bank notes of all the United States persons in trust, today called a bank vault. The simple secret of the ark of the covenant is nothing more than human trafficking through the ancient system of pledging – human beings enfranchised as corporate person denizens (citizens) and traded on the securities markets as future labor. The ark story is nothing if not ceremonial idolatry by the church. The Bible explains how to instead live under a covenant with God (the laws of nature), through the legal remedy called “Jesus Christ”, which simply means to legally claim a spiritual covenant to God (nature) and also to abandon any pledge and allegiance to mammon by quitclaiming the surname.)

Consumeverb transitive [Latin , to take. So in English we say, it takes up time, that is, it consumes time.] 2. To destroy by dissipating or by use; to expend; to waste; to squander; as, to consume an estate. Ye ask, and receive not, because ye ask amiss, that ye may consume it upon your lusts. James 4:3. 3. To spend; to cause to pass away, as time; as, to consume the day in idleness. Their days did he consume in vanity. Psalms 78:33. 4. To cause to disappear; to waste slowly. 5. To destroy; to bring to utter ruin; to exterminate. Let me alone– that I may consume them. Exodus 32:10. The wicked shall perish–they shall consume Psalms 37:20.

(Note: Your status as a consumer is literally a hidden reference to gentiles (goyim) as persons serving mammon, thus the Biblical reference to “the wicked shall perish” is akin to “burning in hell” – which legally means being consumed by greed and held in an open-air debtor’s prison called the United States. See “hell” defined above. A consumer can only be a debtor slave, for money is but debt, and debt can never pay off debt.)

Testament – A disposition of personal property to take place after the owner’s decease, according to his desire and direction. A testament is the act of last will, clothed with certain solemnities, by which the testator disposes of his property, either universally, or by universal title, or by particular title. Civil Code La. art. 1571. Strictly speaking, the term denotes only a will of personal property; a will of land not being called a “testament.” The word “testament” is now seldom used, except m the heading of a formal will, which usually begins: “This is the last will and testament of me, A. B.,” etc. Sweet. (Black’s Law 1st)

Testamentn. [Latin testamentum, from testor, to make a will.] 1. A solemn authentic instrument in writing, by which a person declares his will as to the disposal of his estate and effects after his death. This is otherwise called a will. A testament to be valid, must be made when the testator is of sound mind, and it must be subscribed, witnessed and published in such manner as the law prescribes. A man in certain cases may make a valid will by words only, and such will is called nuncupative. 2. The name of each general division of the canonical books of the sacred Scriptures; as the Old Testament; the New testament. The name is equivalent to covenant, and in our use of it, we apply it to the books which contain the old and new dispensations; that of Moses, and that of Jesus Christ.

(Note: Testament is synonymous with evidence. The Vatican and its vicar pope claims to be the heir to the last will and testament of Jesus Christ (evidence of God’s will), creating a false god on and of the Earth as land-lord (god) of the temporal realm. By posing as or “impersonating” the Christ (until His alagorical return), through anointment and ceremony, the church claims the power to cleanse people of their sins that only God can forgive, and to somehow forgive digressions over that of God Himself, as if to invoke an earthly power to create a strange state of amnesia in God when a man dies and meets his maker, (that God will not know about a man’s sins?). Thus, the church gives “license” to commit all sorts of unlawful acts under and before God and nature but in the name of the fictional church while pretending to play the part of God’s ambassador on Earth,  in clear contradiction to the sacred oath that says God will ultimately judge all of man’s actions. When any oath is taken, in all of law and any legal settings, it is taken to God as witness and ultimate judge under perjury. This is not theory, but has always been the traditional oath (sacramentum), and the church and government uses that oath as an excuse to play gods and land-lords of the secular temporal planet while convincing mankind to treat the church as God’s embassy.)

Redeem – To buy back. To liberate an estate or article from mortgage or pledge by paying the debt for which it stood as security. To repurchase in a literal sense; as, to redeem one’s land from a tax-sale. (Black’s Law 1st)

Redeemable – . 1. Subject to an obligation of redemption; embodying, or conditioned upon, a piomise or obligation of redemption; convertible into coin; as, a “redeemable currency.” 2. Subject to redemption; admitting of redemption or repurchase; given or held under conditions admitting of reacquisition by purchase; as, a “redeemable pledge.” (Black’s Law 1st)

Redeemable Rights – Rights which return to the conveyor or disposer of land, etc., upon payment of the sum for which such rights are granted. (Black’s Law 1st)

RedemptionA repurchase; a buying backThe liberation of a chattel from pledge or pawn, by paying the debt for which it stood as security. Repurchase of notes, bills, or other evidences of debt, (particularly bank-notes and paper-money,) by paying their value in coin to their holders. (Black’s Law 1st)

Redeem – v.t. [Latin redimo; red, re, and emo, to obtain or purchase.] 1. To purchase back; to ransom; to liberate or rescue from captivity or bondage, or from any obligation or liability to suffer or to be forfeited, by paying an equivalent; as, to redeem prisoners or captured goods; to redeem a pledge. 2. To repurchase what has been sold; to regain possession of a thing alienated, by repaying the value of it to the possessor. 3. To rescue; to recover; to deliver from. The mass of earth not yet redeemed from chaos. 5. To free by making atonement. Thou hast one daughter who redeems nature from the general curse. 7. To save. He could not have redeemed a portion of his time for contemplating the powers of nature. 8. To perform what has been promised; to make good by performance. He has redeemed his pledge or promise. 9. In law, to recall an estate, or to obtain the right to re-enter upon a mortgaged estate by paying to the mortgagee his principal, interest, and expenses or costs. 10. In theology, to rescue and deliver from the bondage of sin and the penalties of God’s violated law, by obedience and suffering in the place of the sinner, or by doing and suffering that which is accepted in lieu of the sinner’s obedience. Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us. Galatians 3:13. Titus 2:14.)

Redeemer – n. 1. One who redeems or ransoms. 2. The Savior of the world, JESUS CHRIST.

(Note: God’s violated law is the respect of persons. To be redeemed in law from this violation and from the bondage of sin (person-hood) is the goal of the follower of Christ’s teachings. But they must declare this in the redemption process. Redemption is to “deliver us from evil” of demonic possession, meaning to deliver us from government fiction.)

Savior – n. savyur. One that saves or preserves; but properly applied only to Jesus Christ, the Redeemer, who has opened the way to everlasting salvation by his obedience and death, and who is therefore called the savior by way of distinction, the savior of men, the savior of the world. General Washington may be called the saver, but not the savior of his country.

(Note: Why do we call Christ the redeemer? Why is Christ called a savior? Why do we say we are saved by Christ? Why does belief in Christ give onto us everlasting salvation? Because redeem, savior, save, belief, and salvation are all legal terms utilized to remedy man back into nature from the artificial church and government. The real question you should be asking is: Why have the corporate religions and secret societies lied about the true meaning of these words to the common man? Knowledge is power, and power is control. And the word govern literally translates to mean control. The truth: “Knowledge makes a man unfit to be a slave.” No controlling church or state wishes its members to learn that!)

Deliver – v.t. [Latin Free, disengaged; to free, to peel.] 1. To free; to release, as from restraint; to set at liberty; as, to deliver one from captivity. 2. To rescue, or save. Deliver me, O my God, from the hand of the wicked. Psalms 71:4. 3. To give, or transfer; to put into another’s hand or power; to commit; to pass from one to another. 4. To surrender; to yield; to give up; to resign; as, to deliver a fortress to an enemy. It is often followed by up; as, to deliver up the city; to deliver up stolen goods. 7. To exert in motion. To deliver to the wind, to cast away; to reject. To deliver over, to transfer; to give or pass from one to another; as, to deliver over goods to another.2. To surrender or resign; to put into anothers power; to commit to the discretion of; to abandon to. Deliver me not over to the will of my enemies. Psalms 27:12. To deliver up, to give up; to surrender.

(Note: To be delivered from evil is simply to be freed, released, liberated, rescued, saved, transferred, and resigned from the artificial person in total abandonment. It is the act of rejection of all of the fictional things of mammon. Forgive us our tresspasses (debts)… for thine is the kindom and the power and the glory forever…)

Trespass –  n. In law, violation of another’s rights, not amounting to treason, felony, or misprision of either. Thus to enter another’s close, is a trespass; to attack his person is a trespass. When violence accompanies the act, it is called a trespass vi et armis. 1. Any injury or offense done to another. If ye forgive not men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses. Matthew 6:14. 2. Any voluntary transgression of the moral law; any violation of a known rule of duty; sin. Colossians 2:13. You hath he quickened, who were dead in trespasses and sins. Ephesians 2:1.

(Note: Though a difficult concept, we must forgive the trespass of all against our person, for we no longer accept the person as true, thus such trespass and harm cannot harm us. Bear no ill will towards men who attack your person in their own persona. Instead simply abandon and quitclaim-ing the person and forgive those who trespass against it, for it is an empty vessel of fiction unattached to your body and soul. Enmity by freed and delivered men over actions done by fictional persons to other fictional persons is foolish and ultimately pointless in nature. Forgiveness is paramount to peace. And most necessary is forgiveness of the self and any trespass and debt through redemption of Christ, legally speaking!)

Surrender, verb transitive [Latin sursum, and rendre, to render.] 1. To yield to the power of another; to give or deliver up possession upon compulsion or demand; as, to surrender one’s person to an enemy2. To yield; to give up; to resign in favor of another; as, to surrender a right or privilege; to surrender a place or an office. 3. To give up; to resign; as, to surrender the breath. 4. In law, to yield an estate, as a tenant, into the hands of the lord for such purposes as are expressed in the act. 5. To yield to any influence, passion or power; as, to surrender one’s self to grief, to despair, to indolence or to sleep. – v.t. To yield; to give up one’s self into the power of another. – n. The act of yielding or resigning one’s person or the possession of something, into the power of another; as the surrender of a castle to an enemy; the surrender of a right or of claims.2. In law, the yielding of an estate by a tenant to the lord, for such purposes as are expressed by the tenant in the act.

(Note: Quite simply, by surrendering to God and God’s plan of remedy through Christ, we surrender and thus abandon our surety and bond to the fictional person, holding no claim to rights or duties and claiming no redemption, privilege, or law from government. You must surrender your person back to its owner (government) in order to cease being liable for its usury charges and obligations (duties). You must cease to be a user of government property. Note also that this word is a combination of the word sur and the word render, and that in an official surrender it is the name that is given up in the action.)

Atonement – n. 1. Agreement; concord; reconciliation, after enmity or controversy. Romans 5:11. 2. Expiation; satisfaction or reparation made by giving an equivalent for an injury, or by doing or suffering that which is received in satisfaction for an offense or injury; with for. When a man has been guilty of any vice, the best atonement he can make for it is, to warn others not to fall into the like. 3. In theology, the expiation of sin made by the obedience and personal sufferings of Christ.

Purchase – v.t. [… purchaser is to pursue to the end or object, and hence to obtain. In Law Latin, purchase the noun, was written purchacium… In its primary and legal sense, to gain, obtain or acquire by any means, except by descent or hereditary right (to gain through artificial means without deserving). 2. In common usage, to buy; to obtain property by paying an equivalent in money. It differs from barter only in the circumstance, that in purchasing, the price or equivalent given or secured is money; in bartering, the equivalent is given in goods. We purchase lands or goods for ready money or on credit. 3. To obtain by an expense of labor, danger or other sacrifice; as, to purchase favor with flattery. 4. To expiate or recompense by a fine or forfeit; as, to purchase out abuses with tears and prayer. 5. To sue out or procure, as a writ… It is foolish to lay out money in the purchase of repentance.

Offering – p.p.t. Presenting; proposing; sacrificing; bidding; presenting to the eye or mind. n. That which is presented in divine service; an animal or a portion of bread or corn, or of gold and silver, or other valuable articles, presented to God as an atonement for sin, or as a return of thanks for his favors, or for other religious purpose; a sacrifice; an oblation. In the Mosaic economy, there were burnt-offerings, sin-offerings, peace-offerings, trespass-offerings, thank-offerings, wave-offerings, and wood-offerings. Pagan nations also present offerings to their deities. Christ by the offering of himself has superseded the use of all other offerings, having made atonement for all men. When thou shalt make his soul an offering for sin, he shall see his seed – Isaiah 53:10.

(Note: Have you ever considered that by placing check or cash into an offering plate that you are actually participating in a blood sacrifice? After all, what thing has more innocent blood attached to it than that of the U.S. Dollar and the wars and many collective sins it represents? This offering of sacrifice is not to God, for God does not require such things. Only man would destroy what God creates. And if anything, the offering of mammon (money) to God could only be taken as a severe insult and blasphemy to everything Sacred and Holy in the Bible, which is totally against the concept of money.)

Dummy – n. One who holds legal title for another; a straw man. – a. Sham; make-believe; pretended; imitation. (Black’s Law 4rth)

Dummy Corporation – This term is given to a company that functions as a legal enterprise but really has nor purpose at all in the corporation. (Black’s Law 2nd)

Bail – v. To procure the release of a person from legal custody, by undertaking that he shall appear at the time and place
designated and submit himself to the jurisdiction and judgment of the court. To set at liberty a person arrested or imprisoned, on security being taken for his appearance on a day and a place certain, which security is called “bail,” because the party arrested or imprisoned is delivered into the hands of those who bind themselves for his forthcoming, (that is, become bail for his due appearance when required,) in order that he may be safely protected from prison. – n. In practice. The sureties who procure the release of a person under arrest, by becoming responsible for his appearance at the time and place designated. Those persons who become sureties for the appearance of the defendant in court. Upon those contracts of indemnity which are taken in legal proceedings as security for the performance of an obligation imposed or declared by the tribunals, and known as undertakings or recognizances, the sureties are called “bail.” In Canadian law. A lease. Bail erhphyteotique. A lease for years, with a right to prolong indefinitely. It is equivalent to an alienation.

Civil bail. That taken in civil actions. Special bail, being persons who undertake that if the defendant is condemned in the action he shall pay the debt or surrender himself for imprisonment.

(Note: Because the God-given name and the surname are connected in contract and consent, this is a fictional representation of the natural man and the artificial person also being connected. Though born naked and innocent, the man is immediately incorporated with the invisible veil of clothing of the corporate fiction person. For purely commercial purposes, the man acts as the person (man is legally an actor playing the part of the person) and is thus responsible for what the artificial person does in commerce. Of course, government passes laws that make every action in natural life appear to be a commercial venture in law, requiring licenses, permits, insurances, and other bondage tools in order to do just about everything that is in fact non-commercial in nature. This brings into law (in-jures) every action taken by the man and makes it commerce of the person, no matter how insignificant it may be. The artificial person is a debtor, we must not forget that. No man can be in debt, except to God, for man can have no other master and must abandon the debt system of mammon to be a slave to God. So any “crime” the person makes is always as a debtor. Thus, all prisons are debtor’s prisons. To get out of jail, the man must pay the debt of his strawman person in the form of bail, agreeing to appear as that artificial person in a debtor’s court. This ensures that man will fulfill his or her role as an actor, playing the part of the debtor person, appearing as a strawman.)

Strawman – 1. Draft or outline copy ready for suggestions and comments. 2. Third party used as a cover in illegal or shady deals. 3. Nominee director. 4. A weak or flawed person with no standing. Also called man of straw. See judgement proof. (Black’s Law 2nd)

Stramineus Homo – L. Lat. A man of straw, one of no substance, put forward as bail or surety.

Slave – n. A person who is wholly subject to the will of another; one who has no freedom of action, but whose person and services are wholly under the control of another. Webster. One who is under the power of a master, and who belongs to him; so that the master may sell and dispose of his person, of his industry, and of his labor, without his being able to do anything, have anything, or acquire anything, but what must belong to his master. Civil Code La. art. 35.

(Note: Here we understand that you cannot serve two masters (God and Mammon), or more to the point a man cannot be a slave to both. To declare oneself to be a “slave of Christ” or God is to declare oneself not to be a slave-person of government. This is a legal standing, not a religious sentiment. The court cannot recognize only a person of government (mammon), not a servant God. As a slave to God, a man can only acquire what is of God (natural) in nature, which means he or she cannot acquire (respect) a person or anything artificial or fictional in law. This creates a sort of automatic remedy by never allowing surety or bondage to any man-made thing, status, or person. But man must walk in the true Christian path to avoid such status, bondage, and person-hood.)

Sin Tax – An ad valorem tax or flat tax levied on services and goods that are considered to be morally or physically harmful such as alcohol, cigarettes and gambling. (Black’s Law 2nd)

 (Note: Under government you ridiculously pay a tax as forgiveness of sin. Under God, you have no such forgiveness. Yet the church is there to reenforce this hypocrisy to God through doctrinal remission.)

Indulgence – In the Roman Catholic Church. A remission of the punishment due to sins, granted by the pope or church, and supposed to save the sinner from purgatory. Its abuse led to the Reformation in Germany. Forbearance

Forbearance – The act of abstaining from proceeding against a delinquent debtor; delay in exacting the enforcement of a right; indulgence granted to a debtor. Refraining from action. The term is used in this sense in general jurisprudence, in contradistinction to “act.”

CombustioBurning. In old English law. The punishment inflicted upon apostates. (Black’s Law 1st)

(Note: Think debtors burning alive in the dungeons called hell for abandoning the church. True Christians that abandoned church and religious doctrine in seeking the peace and purity of God and Christ were burned, tortured, and thrown to the lions by the church and state, for they could not be controlled by man’s law. True Christianity is indeed illegal.)

Apostata – In civil and old English law. An apostate; a deserter from the faith; one who has renounced the Christian faith. (Black’s Law 1st)

(Note: Here the word faith is stated as a legal status; as a person, member, or citizen of the church and state. Your personal (illegal) faith does not matter to the church and state, only your legally pledged faith as servitude to that corporate structure’s control of your person. Abandonment makes you an apostate of the corporate structure, but in God’s eyes as a legal remedy it makes you a true Biblical Christian immune to corporate law.)

Apostasy – In English law. The total renunciation of Christianity, by embracing either a false religion or no religion at all. This offense can only take place in such as have once professed the Christian religion. (Black’s Law 1st)

Apostate – n. [Gr.] One who has forsaken the church, sect or profession to which he before adhered. In its original sense, applied to one who has abandoned his religion; but correctly applied also to one who abandons a political or other party. a. False; traitorous. (Black’s Law 1st)

(Note: Apostasy was part of the law of the land, created by the church, and not just some religious concept without true legal meaning. Yet again the Bible refers to the “vicar” of the Christ here, as an apostate is one who forsakes the church/government, not to be mistaken for the abandonment of God (creator). To be an apostate is a declaration of abandonment of a corporate church and its doctrinal religion upon a person, having nothing to do with the Bible or with God. It is not a sin against God to quitclaim religion, but rather only a sin against government and corporate church. The word sin in the Bible ofter refers to sin against church and state (the god or landlord), not sin against God Himself.)

Fictio – In Roman law. A fiction; an assumption or supposition of the law. “Fictio” in the old Roman law was properly a term of pleading, and signified a false averment on the part of the plaintiff which the defendant was not allowed to traverse; as that the plaintiff was a Roman citizen, when in truth he was a foreigner. The object of the fiction was to give the court jurisdiction. (Black’s Law 1st)

Fiction – n. [Latin fictio, from fingo, to feign.] 1. The act of feigning, inventing or imagining; as, by the mere fiction of the mind. 2. That which is feigned, invented or imagined. The story is a fiction. So also was the fiction of those golden apples kept by a dragon, taken from the serpent which tempted Eve.

FictionAn assumption or supposition of law that something which is or may be false is true, or that a state of facts exists which has never really taken place. A fiction is a rule of law which assumes as true, and will not allow to be disproved, something which is false, but not impossible. Fictions are to be distinguished from presumptions of law. By the former (fiction), something known to be false or unreal is assumed as true; by the latter (presumtion of law), an inference is set up, which may be and probably is true, but which, at any rate, the law will not permit to be controverted. (Black’s Law 1st)

(Note: Though the courts know and recognize that a person is not alive, not true, imaginary, feigned, invented, and completely false, the government itself falls under that same description, and thus a fiction can only recognize another fiction. A living man is unrecognizable in court without a surname (person), as government only has jurisdiction over fictions, and government holds no authority over men claimed in surety to Christ.)

Overcomev.t. [See Come.] 1. To conquer; to vanquish; to subdue; as, to overcome enemies in battle. 2. To surmount; to get the better of; as, to overcome difficulties or obstacles. 3. To overflow; to surcharge. – v.i. To gain the superiority; to be victorious. Romans 3:4.

Overcome  – As used in a statute providing that a presumption may be overcome by other evidence, this term is not synonymous with overbalance or outweigh, but requires merely that such evidence counterbalance the presumption, where the party relying on it has the burden of proof. (Black’s Law 4rth)

Overcome – a term that is used for overcoming evidence that is presented by a party to a suit by presenting more convincing evidence. (Black’s Law 2nd)

(Note: Evidence of God’s laws of nature is always better and of higher authority as evidence than any fiction of man’s law.)

Enfranchise – To make free; to incorporate a man in a society or body politic. (Black’s Law 1st)

Enfranchisement – The act of making free; giving a franchise or freedom to; investiture with privileges or capacities of freedom, or municipal or political liberty. Admission to the freedom of a city; admission to political rights, and particularly the right of suffrage (voting). Anciently, the acquisition of freedom by a villein from his lord. The word is now used principally either of the manumission of slaves, (or) of giving to a borough or other constituency a right to return a member or members to parliament, or of the conversion of copyhold into freehold.

(Final Note: The word citizen stems from the word denizen, which means to enfranchise slaves and lower class common men into an equal state under the law. This signifies the act of assigning a surname to a man or slave and assigning that name to certain privileges, otherwise known as political rights. The citizen should know that the words freedom, liberty, and rights are all alienable privileges granted by government to persons (citizens). The word free-dom means obey the law of man or be punished. The word liberty means the same – to be free to act as long as man’s law is followed. The prefix “dom” means dominion, so as to signify that the state of being free for a man is dominated by the state, which it calls political freedom or political or civil liberty. Man can only be free under God, whereas he can only have artificial freedom under mammon, for he impersonates a regulated fiction of mammon. Like a rented car (vehicle), the fictional person (vehicle) comes with many rules for the user to comply with under force of law. In nature, the only law is to do no harm, and as long as this is maintained, a man is always free to do as he pleases. The word people means gentiles; common peasants; the lowest form of person and societal status. If you are one of the people, then you have no voice, only the collective has the voice, and it is completely controlled by the noble (higher) wealthy class. Knowing this, I wish you luck in your continuing disgrace in nature as you posses like a demon your rented fiction of man.

–=–

Conclusion

–=–

While there are many other words that could be contemplated here for their legal capacity within the Bible, I hope that this journey has opened your eyes to the reality of your disposition in life and in the fictional hell you live in. This writing has not been intended to offend or defend any one or any thing, but is given freely in genuine care and concern for my fellow man. No man can be free until all men are free. And we certainly are harmed by our lack of knowledge. Please understand that your personal beliefs in the comprehension of God are not the subject of this essay, nor should they interfere with the legal language. For the legal law knows no emotion, ethics, morals, values, love, hate, or any other human emotion or adoration, and so we must separate our conversational word from our legal words. this is one of the hardest things you will ever have to do in your life, even as the realization of the purposefully dualistic nature of the English language becomes ultimately and agonizingly apparent. I wish you the very best in your journey, and hope this collection will be an integral tool in your redemption from the tyranny of men.

I have suffered fools, including myself, for too long now. I redeem myself to the reader in hopeful abandon that the world can change and that all men can live be free…

.

(Christian name) Clint (Surname) Richardson – (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Wednesday, April 3oth, 2014

 

 

Good Faith Notice Of Render (Abandon) Of Surname And Withdrawal Of Christian Name


The following letter is from Daniel. For those that have not been privy to our discussions on the radio, please enjoy the commercial free interviews at the end of this post. This was what Daniel considers his final step in ridding his given name of any government encroachments. Before this, Daniel returned his government issued certificates, licenses, and any other official documents with the surname or social security insurance number attached, and also included copies of those within this letter.

The names have been made generic.

We will be following up in future shows starting today to explain in further detail this “Christian Remedy In Law”.

For those not willing to consider such a thing, I have created a mini-dictionary of Biblical words taken out of the legal dictionaries and compiled a very in depth essay that will explain this whole process not as a religious one, but as a completely legal one. Do not let the doctrines of religion get in the way of understanding the 1611 Bible as the basis of all legal law in the “civilized” world. Again, this is not religion, but legal fiction.

Please see my next blog post called “Cracking The Legal Code Of King James“, which will be posted immediately following this post tonight.

Link –> https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2014/04/30/cracking-the-legal-code-of-king-james/

Daniel’s Youtube site: https://www.youtube.com/user/ChristianRemedyInLaw

And now, as promised, not to be suffered by fools, Daniel’s Notice of Render And Abandon of Surname:

———————————————————-
Good Faith Notice Of Render (Abandon)
Of Surname And Withdrawal Of Christian Name
———————————————————-

(Page 1 of 5)

Greetings and salutations John-Que PUBLIC, Office of the Public Guardian and Trustee, Ministry of the Attorney General:

May the grace of Our Lord Jesus Christ be with you. The salutation by the hand of me, seed of Abraham, seed of the woman, Tribe of Judah (favour, praise), Christian name John, Ambassador and witness for Christ.

Verily, I make a good confession to all higher powers of government ordained by God (YHWH) just as my Sovereign, King, Master, Lord, Saviour, advocate and surety in all matters whatsoever, Jesus Christ, made a good confession to the Roman high priest and governor, Pontius Pilate:

John 18:36 [Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)] – Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.

I forgive and forget any and all trespasses that have occurred upon my God-given unalienable Christian name, John; and, therefore, I divorce and forsake the surname, SMITH, in order to divorce myself from any implied or expressed trespass upon it and I pray the Lord’s Prayer in this matter:

Matthew 6:9-13 [Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)] – 9 After this manner therefore pray ye: Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name. 10 Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven. 11 Give us this day our daily bread. 12 And forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors. 13 And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil: For thine is the kingdom, and the power, and the glory, for ever. Amen.

I have been in soulful prayer of moral conscience as to what is right and what is wrong with respect to the question of the use of the surname agnomen, fictio, arma, after-acquired property, SMITH, placed over my graced, true, original, God-given unalienable Christian real birth name, John. I give you good faith notice that as a set-apart Christian believer, bestowed the nativity God-given unalienable Christian name, John, known by my heavenly Father before the foundation of the world, or any secular foundation identity document, instrument of man’s factitious world, I cannot be involved in an implied dual allegiance to serve two masters. The Authorized 1611 King James Holy Bible admonishes me at Matthew 6:24 and states:

Matthew 6:24 [Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)] – No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.

Therefore, as an Act of God, bestowed the God-given unalienable Christian name John, being no part of the secular world of man or governments, I must stay within the protective realm of my Master, Lord, Saviour, Sovereign, advocate and surety, Jesus Christ’s Kingdom, in absolute loyalty, being neutral to the affairs of man’s constituted governments.

Under the definition of “Christian” the compact edition of the OXFORD ENGLISH DICTIONARY, Volume 2, states:

“6. Christian name. … When a man is made a spiritual peer he loses his sir-name; when a temporal, his christian-name.”

When a man accepts Christ as his Lord, Master and Saviour, he sheds the surname (sir-name), which is the “Antonomasia” [see definitions below], otherwise, to claim right to the surname would be a conflict of loyalties (allegiance), and it would place my Christian name, John, in future spiritual jeopardy with Almighty God (YHWH) and Jesus Christ, my Saviour, Master, Lord, advocate and surety.

I only desire conditions of peace with my fellow man and relinquish any thing in question that would express or imply that I, Christian name John, lay claim to war in any form whatsoever.

(Page 2 of 5)

ANTONOMASIA. Definition from the OXFORD ENGLISH DICTIONARY Latin, a. Greek … to name instead. The substitution of an epithet or appellative or the name of an office or dignity, for a person’s proper name, as the Iron Duke for Wellington, his grace for an archbishop. Also, conversely, the use of a proper name to express a general idea, as in calling an orator a Cicero, a wise judge, a Daniel. … a 1638 mede Wks. II. 332 That Capitolium by antonomasia is put for a Gentile Temple in general. … 1759 Adam Smith Mor. Sent. (1797) II. Any This way of speaking, which the grammarians call an antonomasia.

I, Christian name, John, having accepted my Lord, Master and surety, Christ Jesus, as my redeemer for I am called in the Lord and am a slave of the Lord, Christ Jesus, my Master. Therefore, I am the purchased property of the Lord Christ Jesus, King of kings and Lord of lords, a freeman called in the Lord Christ Jesus, and not the debtor property or servant of a gentile, pagan, unbeliever feudal lord or war-like insurgent secular freeman on the land who deceives himself by believing and acting as some factitious “thing” (surname) when he is no “thing” (see Galatians 6:3 AKJV).

1 Corinthians 7:21-23 [Authorized 1611 King James Version(AKJV)] – 21 Art thou called being a servant? are not for it: but if thou mayest be made free, use it rather. 22 For he that is called in the Lord, being a servant, is the Lord’s freeman: likewise also he that is called, being free, is Christ’s servant. 23 Ye are bought with a price; be not ye the servants of men.

Although my earthly parents were ignorant of the fact of the requirement of the true supreme spiritual duty to only serve Almighty God (YHWH), and remain under the absolute true supreme spiritual duty to serve the anointed of God (YHWH), Christ Jesus, the Lord of lords, King of kings, Prince of Peace, my Sovereign Master, I, bestowed the God-given unalienable Christian name John, must and do hereby forever quit claim, relinquish, yield up, forsake, disclaim, renounce, render and resign as surety (guarantor) for the after-acquired, secular, gentile, public interest thing, man’s person title, agnomen, debtor surname, SMITH, the property belonging to a secular master contrary to God (YHWH) and the anointed of God (YHWH), Christ Jesus, the Lord of lords, King of kings, Prince of Peace, my Sovereign Master, of whom I serve exclusively. It would be wrong and against my good moral conscience to commit spiritual suicide by being unequally yoked or joined in name to unbelievers by wearing a factitious badge of fraud, blasphemous, gentile, pagan, unbeliever, war title surname SMITH, although for unbelievers it may be customary to do so.

STRONG’S CONCORDANCE defines the Hebrew word “title” (H3655) as “surname” and Job 32:21-22 [AKJV] admonishes me that I must not accept the factitious badge of fraud, blasphemous, gentile, pagan, unbeliever, debtor, war title surname SMITH:

Job 32:21-22 [Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)] – 21 Let me not, I pray you, accept any man’s person, neither let me give flattering titles unto man. 22 For I know not to give flattering titles; in so doing my maker would soon take me away.

To innocence and life revealed, to death denied, to the triumph of the truth of the graced God-given unalienable Christian name, John (seed of the woman), overcoming the appearance of guilt of the condemned fictional, lie, accused, debtor, alienable surname (seed of the serpent), SMITH.

I am a Christian conscientious objector which is one who by reason of religious training or belief is conscientiously opposed to participation in war in any form and neutral to the affairs and titles of man’s secular world and constituted secular governments. As a true Christian I am conscientiously opposed on religious grounds to participation in war and need not be a member of a religious sect whose creed forbids participation in war to be entitled to classification as a conscientious objector. It is sufficient that I have a conscientious scruple against war in any form.

The surname is a form of war, which I refuse to claim and which I also do not consent to bear or take benefit from in any way whatsoever. I remove my consent and direct you to remove my God-given unalienable Christian name, John, photograph (image) and signature from any secular government documents expressing or implying my consent, to use the surname, SMITH, or to act as surety for it. It is treason against God (YHWH) and non-subjection to the higher powers of man’s government ordained (authorized) by God (YHWH) to claim right to and impersonate some “Thing” that does not belong to me as I am an Act of God, bestowed the God-given unalienable Christian real name John, not entitled to a secular surname.

(Page 3 of 5)

Therefore, I render and relinquish back the surname (title / property), SMITH, which does not belong to me, back to its true registered owner so that I am free of charge.

To be absolutely clear, I bestowed the private, peaceful, spiritual, graced, God-given unalienable Christian real name, John, Tribe of Judah (favour, praise), fellow citizen with the saints of Heavenly New Jerusalem, God’s (YHWH) Kingdom, no part of the secular world of gentile nations, hereby forever quit claim, relinquish, yield up, forsake, disclaim, renounce, render and resign as surety for the after-acquired, blasphemous, secular, gentile, public interest thing, man’s person title, agnomen, debtor surname, SMITH, the property belonging to a secular master contrary to God (YHWH) and the anointed of God (YHWH), Christ Jesus, the Lord of lords, King of kings, Prince of Peace, my Sovereign Master, of whom I serve exclusively.

I further renounce all common civil rights, which includes the right to money, gain, profit and claim to the title, agnomen, factitious surname SMITH, the public interest property of Her Majesty, that I was never entitled to claim right to as a son of the true God (YHWH) and slave of my Lord, King, Sovereign, surety and Master, Christ Jesus, the name above every name named.

In the event that your secular government of the Province of Ontario refuses to remove the blasphemy of the surname, SMITH, off the original STATEMENT OF BIRTH record, of which I am forbidden by God (YHWH) to use, then I remove my consent and God-given unalienable Christian name, John, off that original STATEMENT OF BIRTH record. A line must be drawn through the surname SMITH as this would be evidence of erasure or cancellation (blotting out).

To be clear, I direct you according to Colossians 2: 12-15 (AKJV) as I believe you to be the higher powers of government ordained by God (YHWH) to blot out, erasure, the blasphemous surname off the STATEMENT OF BIRTH record and provide me a “Certified A true copy” of this record verifying only my God-given unalienable Christian name, John, blotting out (cancelling) the ordinance of the law [i.e. certificate of debt, or BIRTH CERTIFICATE] containing the blasphemous surname, SMITH, written contrary to me as an Act of God (YHWH), unalienable set-apart Christian believer, bestowed the graced name John, a pardoned gift from God (YHWH). As a Christian I must be civilly dead to the constituted world of man.

Colossians 2:13-15 [Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)] – 13 And you, being dead in your sins and the uncircumcision of your flesh, hath he quickened together with him, having forgiven you all trespasses; 14 blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross; 15 and having spoiled principalities and powers, he made a shew of them openly, triumphing over them in it.

For further clarity, the Gideon’s New Testament wrote Colossians 2:14 as follows:

“having cancelled out the certificate of debt consisting of decrees written against us…”

To be clear, the “certificate of debt” is the Federal CITIZENSHIP CERTIFICATE and the Provincial BIRTH CERTIFICATE, which are Her Majesty’s property.

To be clear, remove my signature, photograph (image) and God-given unalienable Christian name, John from all Federal and Provincial (State) secular records or instruments implying my consent to act as surety for the property of another, that being the surname SMITH, which is foreign and blasphemous to God (YHWH) and me as a Christian believer.

Never communicate to me addressing me with the blasphemous agnomen surname SMITH, an unclean thing, a factitious blasphemous artifice of fraud, since you have been given good faith notice not to do so. I believe the use of the blasphemous surname is forbidden by both God (YHWH) and by your secular government. I do not require a license to be who I really am, that being the God-given unalienable Christian name John. A license is only required to impersonate the thing, person or property belonging to another (i.e. blasphemous, debtor secular surname).

Revelation 18:4 [Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)] – And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.

(Page 4 of 5)

The “Her” of Revelation is of the Roman Empire, which lays claim to the Roman civil surname thing, of which I lay no right or claim to in order to remain in peace and subjection to the higher powers of government as an Ambassador and witness for Christ.

It is only honest and logical if one continues to use the thing belonging to another, that being the surname that one would be under duty, debt and obligation to continue returning fees required for its use. If an individual believer in Christ Jesus, such as myself, relinquishes, renounces and gives up forever all claim and right to the surname to whomever is the feudal lord and master of it (i.e. Her Majesty and/or her duly appointed representatives) then one has in good faith returned to their original allegiance to Almighty God (YHWH) the Father and walks under the surety of Christ Jesus, the true Master, Sovereign, Lord of lords and King of Kings and Prince of Peace.

NOAH WEBSTER’S 1828 DICTIONARY OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE defines “RENDER” as,

“To yield or give up the command or possession of … to restore.”

Therefore, I hereby fully divorce myself from the gentile, civil, Roman, blasphemous, agnomen, debtor surname, SMITH, property belonging to another, of which is not mine, by fully restoring it to its proper owner, being Her Majesty. This is the final tax return as I am to render to Caesar what is Caesar’s, being the surname SMITH, the unnecessary addition of which creates the unequal yoke known as the combined “Legal Name” JOHN SMITH. I relinquish and renunciate all common right to gain or mammon or money in order to serve my true Father, God (YHWH), and his only begotten Son, my Saviour, Sovereign, Master, King of kings, Lord of Lords, Prince of Peace, advocate and surety in all matters whatsoever.

I, God given unalienable Christian name, John, must obey my true Father, God (YHWH):

Acts 5:29 [Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)] – Then Peter and the other apostles answered and said, We ought to obey God rather than men.

I give my Spirit, the God-given unalienable Christian name, John, to God (YHWH); and, I render the dead body corporate surname, SMITH, to Caesar, the thing belonging to Her Majesty, a gentile queen ordained to punish evil and reward good (see Romans 13:1-5 AKJV), who does not represent God’s (YHWH) Kingdom. The patriarchal Kingly Tribe of Judah does not appoint queens and Christ Jesus is the last King of the Tribe of Judah, being no part of the constituted world of man’s secular governments.

I, Christian name John will not bear arms, that being the surname SMITH or any symbol of war in any form for or against Her Majesty as I am a Christian peacemaker under the allegiance of Christ Jesus, my surety, being no part of man’s secular world. In summary, I believe that relinquishing the use of the surname SMITH is the only right honest thing to do to eliminate all confusion and to remain in good moral conscience with both the Supremacy of God (YHWH) and the rule of law.

My Christian Charter and Book of Authorities is the Authorized 1611 King James Holy Bible, which supports my Christian faith and my God-given unalienable Christian name, John, bestowed upon me as grace and pardon at birth, and I accept Christ Jesus, who acts as surety for me, blotting out all charges, fees and encumbrances (certificate of debt) written against me. God (YHWH) knew me before the foundation of the world. The baptised font Christian name bestowed upon me on the original STATEMENT OF BIRTH document blotted out the surname that was written contrary to me and took it out of the way by the power of Christ Jesus, my surety.

I declared my faith by water baptism on October 12, 2013 A.D. in a tributary of the Humber River in Caledon, Ontario, within PART OF LOT 1, CONCESSION 5, AND PART OF THE ROAD ALLOWANCE BETWEEN THE TOWNSHIPS OF ADJALA AND ALBION, TOWNSHIP OF ADJALA, COUNTY OF SIMCOE. I lay down the arma, agnomen surname SMITH, property of Her Majesty, and return to my original allegiance of peace to serve only God (YHWH) and his anointed King, Christ Jesus, my Master, Saviour and surety. May the grace of Our Lord Jesus Christ be with you all. The salutation by the hand of me, seed of Abraham, seed of the woman, Tribe of Judah (favour, praise), Christian name John, witness for Christ.

(Page 5 of 5)

By this good faith notice and as an Act of God (YHWH) I am now and forever free of all public alienable charges by this act of relinquishment of the surname SMITH, the property belonging to Her Majesty, of which I am not entitled to as a Christian disciple serving only my Lord, Master, Sovereign, Saviour and surety, Christ Jesus. I am no longer ignorant of the fact that Christ Jesus is my surety and has bestowed upon me the God-given unalienable nativity Christian name John, and am no longer ignorant of the law that forbids me to claim right to or use the alienable man-made positive law blasphemous war surname of fiction, SMITH, without consenting to accept the penalty for its use, which is treason against God (YHWH), and which I am not entitled to bear as an Ambassador and witness for Christ Jesus, my Sovereign, Master, Saviour, Lord of lords, King of kings and Prince of Peace.

   John  

God-given, real, unalienable Christian name John, Ambassador and witness for Christ Jesus. Dated this fourth day of April in the two thousand and fourteenth Year from the birth of Our Lord and Saviour, Jesus Christ, the King of kings, Sovereign, Master, Lord of lords, and Prince of Peace, my advocate and surety.

NOTE: Attached to this good faith notice I enclose copies of:

(1) Copy of long form (Form 2) STATEMENT OF BIRTH RECORD.- [ NOTE: This instrument cancelled all debt, expressed, implied or written, against my graced God-given unalienable nativity Christian fact, real name, John, the purchased property of Christ Jesus].

(2) Copies of all secular government-issued documents or instruments.

(3) Copy of the heraldry or coat-of-arms for the war surname SMITH

c.c.

Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth II.
Governor General of Canada.
Lieutenant Governor of the Province of Ontario.
Registrar General for the Province of Ontario.

b.c.c.

———————————————————————-

–=–

Confused? Think this is religious nonsense? What if the Bible isn’t about religion at all, but is instead a legal guide and remedy to escape from the tyranny of religion and government? What if the very authority of government stems from that very book, and we must therefore acknowledge the Biblical remedy to the Biblical law (testament).

View my exhaustive explanation and compendium of Biblical legal words here: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2014/04/30/cracking-the-legal-code-of-king-james/

And listen to our several interviews explaining the whole hidden meanings disclosed in Daniel’s above letter from The Corporation Nation Radio program here:

February 26th, 2014:

Download: http://corporationnationradioarchives.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/show88_feb26.mp3

March 5th, 2014:

Download: http://corporationnationradioarchives.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/show93_march05.mp3

March 12th, 2014:

Download: http://corporationnationradioarchives.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/show98_march121.mp3

March 19th, 2014:

Download: http://corporationnationradioarchives.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/show103_march19.mp3

March 26th, 2014:

Download: http://corporationnationradioarchives.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/show108_march26.mp3

April 2nd, 2014

Download: http://corporationnationradioarchives.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/show112_april02.mp3

April 9th, 2014:

Download: http://corporationnationradioarchives.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/show117_april09.mp3

April 16th, 2014:

Download: http://corporationnationradioarchives.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/show122_april16.mp3

April 18th, 2014:

Download: http://corporationnationradioarchives.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/show124_april18.mp3

April 23rd, 2014:

Download: http://corporationnationradioarchives.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/show127_april23.mp3

.

–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Wednesday, April 30th, 2014