Orwell’s New Law: Intolerance Is Tolerance


—=—

“A man in debt is so far a slave.”

—Ralph Waldo Emerson

—=—

I’ve got something to say, and you probably aren’t going to like it. And try as you will to dispute it, the Truth is a piercing sword, unable to be deflected even in this time of great deceit — this grand delusion.

Yes, freedom is slavery. It’s called the commercial franchise of national citizenship (legally called as freedom), a reimagined form of denizenship as a post-modern neo-feudalistic form of the same old debt-slavery of yesteryear.

Yes, we understand that war is peace. These are merely the two different extremes of a legally (secularly) bound international commerce, the state of war being a violent purge of uncooperative nations or people (tribes) seeking independence from a slave-inducing, interconnected world currency and its performance-debtor slave system through extortive taxation and internationally imposed sanctions. When the violent, murderous trade war ceases, the then subdued, defeated nations submit to the usual forced but supposedly voluntary “peace” of commerce via international trade yet again. The difference between war and peace is merely a declaration of one or the other, though both have the same goal, to profit the elite bloodlines of archons behind nation-building and United Nations programs that assure free-flowing commerce (peace) between those internationally bound corporations (nations).

And yes, we have witnessed globally that ignorance is strength. But this phenomenon is only understandable from the perspective of national governments toward their enslaved, enfranchised (free range) masses (common human live-stock), as we are hopelessly educated and entrained by entertainments and standardized, institutionalized lies (also called history), and of course what is quickly becoming our very own censored, institutionalized newspeak. My people around the world are, without a doubt, being destroyed and controlled through a mandated, standardized system that teaches and instills a guaranteed lack of knowledge. It’s called public education.

But there is an underlying Orwellian, that is, dystopian maxim that stands as the foundation for all of this, the source behind all three of these seemingly paradoxical but fully demonstrable states of induced, artificial existence detached from Nature (God), which have led to this now globalist Newspeak society we pretend to exist in. There is one ingredient, one agenda that must be pushed universally for this trifecta of dark, globalist tyranny to prevail…

There must be a despotically enforced, unequivocal (absolute) state of artificial, passively consented-to tolerance.

—=—

Our rulers can have no authority over natural rights,
only as we have submitted to them
.
The rights of conscience we never submitted.
We are answerable for them to our God.
The legitimate powers of government extend
to such acts only as injurious to others
.”  

—Thomas Jefferson

—=—

What is the highest moral (Natural) Law? To do no harm, without exception, including the use of words as weapons.

What do the governments of men thrive upon? Doing harm, and more specifically causing us all to harm one another in any way legally possible (permissively through words) as a dysfunctional lifestyle. In other words, creating and administering dystopia — a debtor’s hell.

Our society is like a poker game, consisting of a set of neighbors (players/actors) that pretend a sort of cordial camaraderie and shallow friendship while secretly seeking to competitively out-do, defeat, destroy, and bankrupt each other. Every player at the poker table is necessarily, situationally, and by disposition subjected into being a member of the anti-cult of the Joneses, always seeking to one-up each other, prideful and miserly of their continued earnings, existing solely for the purpose of profit and gain. Meanwhile, the dealer (government and banker) sets and administrates the rules of this necessary, mutually required illicit conduct, allowing legally (permissively) this abhorrent behavior within a prescribed, licensed set of rules. For this administrative “service” the dealer (government) legally steals (taxes) for its own profit the total wealth spent in each transaction (poker hand), raking in a small percentage from each round of cards (commerce) being dealt for the house — an administrative fee, of course. But as the total money left on the table is constantly diminished by this house service charge (called the take), each neighbor must constantly refresh the money pool with his own savings or, finally, leave bankrupt (as a broke loser). Essentially, this is how governments corral and subjugate their common citizenry, setting the rules of “commerce” (the rules of the game) so that we are all constantly practicing deceit and treachery toward one another while feigning to be good neighbors, the ultimate hypocrisy (simulation). It’s just business, we are entrained to say, as if this is some viable excuse to break the highest law of Nature (God) to love your neighbor, to do no harm, and to act always in love, charity, and forgiveness. But, of course, there would be no poker games or need for government if this moral, spiritual, “unwritten” Law was respected absolutely. Gambling, as does citizenship, requires God’s Law (and therefore natural rights) to be trampled underfoot. In legality, the only duty that can be found is the taxation laid upon us all. Instead of acknowledging and fulfilling our moral duty to all men, we pay a duty (tax) so that we don’t have to. Legalism is, after all, the undoing of God’s (Nature’s) Law.

The point? The legal law can only control us if we can be made to voluntarily, continuously harm and injure one another through legal (man-made) methods of false law. To injure, in legalism, means to bring someone or something IN to and therefore under the legal LAW (jure) by means of invoking it in commerce (contract), or in other words by causing all actions of men to be done through a government assigned, artificial, legal persona (mask) — men acting not in Nature (under God and Its Higher Law) but instead in legal (artificial) persona, a false “strawman” that is property of the commercialized corporation of government. We tolerate harm in every way, to each other and to ourselves, as if it’s a normal, or even natural part of “life” as citizenships (debt-slaves). We are acting as commercial vessels, and therefore, as feudal vassals.

VASSALnoun – 1: A person under the protection of a feudal lord to whom he has vowed homage and fealty: a feudal tenant2: One in a subservient or subordinate position. (–Webster’s Dictionary Online, current)

—=—

Maxim of law: With protection comes subjection (subservience/subordination).

In other words, by doing all things commercially in a false, legal persona (status, which is property of government), all actions done by national “citizens” are considered as being legally protected under international law, and, as the maxim of law goes, with protection comes subjection. You see, this maxim applies to both men and the persons (legal status) men pretend to act within, which inversely means that to have the protection of God (Natural rights), one must subject oneself only to the Law of Nature (God), never to what is legal (anti-God, anti-Nature). And so, having legal protection as “consumers” in commerce requires voluntary personhood (legal existence/status) and subjection to the false gods (magistrates) of government. The concept is not at all different, metaphorically speaking, as being either an angel or a demon. Both answer to their perspective gods and are bound by the law thereof. The personification of the angel guides men towards the Law of Nature while the demon (devil) drives men towards the big lie, the artificial aspect of false existence (citizenship in personhood) separated from Nature (God) and Its Law. The angel exists only in Nature (Reality) and may only influence and guide men towards Nature (God) and Its Law. But the demon exists only in fiction, in legal commerce, unable to do anything to men in Nature nor effect the Natural (God-given) rights of men (to do no harm) unless men can be deceived and tricked into entering into the legal, artificial realm (hell) via commercial contract, including citizenship to the legalist, secular nations. Nature (God) is Truth. Legalism is always a lie. One cannot have two opposing gods (masters), nor can one practice two opposing laws. One cannot claim the Natural rights emanating from Nature (God) while acting in an unnatural state of false existence (persona) and following only the law governing fiction. One cannot follow the Law of Nature (God) while also following its complete, intentional opposite, the law of men (legalism). And while the True intent of the concept of possessing the Natural (God-given) right of freedom of religion only exists in Nature, under God (as the practice only of the Law of Nature and exemption from legal, manmade sanctions), legalism only exists outside of and without God, without the Law of Nature. Legal law is a pretended exemption from the Law and Laws of Nature (God). It is really just satanism in disguise, for the meaning of the word satan is merely that which is adversarial to God (Nature/Truth) and Its Law. In legalism, the legal terminology (trickery) “freedom of religion” actually means freedom from religion, or in other words, freedom from Nature (God) and Its Law. All legal, commercial law necessarily defies, opposes, and abandons what is Nature (God) and Its Law, for all legal persons, places, and things (nouns/names) are false. In Nature, all of Existence (Creation) is anonymous, nameless, and therefore carries no mark, no blemish, and no sign of legal property. Nothing in Nature is property of man. Only legal (artificial) persons, places, and things (names placed upon Reality) are property (creations of) men. And so, when the Law of Nature is transmuted, reconstituted, and thus perverted from Nature (God) into commercial (legal) code, and when men can be tricked into following this artificial code instead of the actual Law of Existence (God), then men carry the delusion that all of Nature, including themselves, are property of some commercial government corporation. Every tree, plant, animal, element, and living creature has been blemished with a legal name (noun/”thing”). Every geographical area of Nature (God) has been bestowed a legal name (noun) designating it a “place” or jurisdiction. And every man has been given an additional name (noun) and other marks that identify us all as some form of legal persona (noun/name). Therefore, through this word-trickery or word-majick of the legal language, all parts of Nature have been claimed as the property of mans creations, of artificial persons (corporations) created by the governments of men.

—=—

“The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie –
deliberate, contrived and dishonest – but the myth,
persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.
Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion
without the discomfort of thought.”

–John F. Kennedy

—=—

We have allowed hell on Earth to come into existence, and we follow its pretenders, its false gods (magistrates) and legal codes as its vassals in an open-air debtors prison. And we have been so far separated from our own Nature (God) by this mythos that even the idea of self-governing under the Law of God by claiming what is inherently ours, that is, our only actual God-given (Natural) right that is to do no harm, no longer exists as even a possibility, for to exist in and under the artifice of nations and legal law we must therefore cause continuous harm to one another. To get ahead one must, either unwittingly or with deceitful understanding, harm all others. To make money (mammon) one must charge usury and act in grocery (harm/evil). And to have wealth as “property” (in mammon) one must act according to the dictates of lust, of greed, and of purposeful antagonism toward the Law and Laws of Nature (God). Citizenship, by its artificial nature, is the seven deadly sins all tied up in one corporate employment to “the state.”

And that’s just what it is: employment. A citizenship is an employee of its government, an agent to its principal. And an employee has no choice. An employee must act the part he or she is playing. A citizenship of a nation (corporation) has no right and no authority to act under Gods (Nature’s) Law. Moral choice is against the legal law. Not moral thought, only the right to act on that moral thought is taken away. Let’s face it… the continuity of government depends solely on men not acting upon their moral conscious against it. And this is the very purpose behind the multitude of false religions married (incorporated) under the legal state – belief without acting on that belief. In other words, hypocrisy (simulation) at its worst.

It is the element of choice that Truly validates ones actions. Legalism takes away choice, and often forces us to do the opposite of what we would otherwise choose to do. Choice is an illusion while we are plugged-in to The Matrix (legal simulation).

The following cannot be feigned or forced by legal sanction. They must come from the soul. They must come from the conscious mind of men, not as a bylaw of a corporation through fictional persons in simulation. For these are “family values” not corporate rules.

Lust is defeated by self-control, that is, self-government, chastity.

Gluttony is defeated by temperance, in serving others before ourselves.

Greed is cured by charity in all things, by putting the needs of others before ourselves.

Sloth is ceased when one has zeal, a zest and respect for all life, and diligence toward the needs of others.

Wrath, as anger toward another, is defeated by patience, by empathetic understanding of the disposition of others.

Envy has no place when the desire to help others succeed is more powerful than the desire to defeat, compete, or otherwise supersede them.

And pride can hold no man’s ego when one stands always in perspective humility, instead standing always in the attitude of service to all men and all True Existence (Nature/God).

The legal person is all of these in one, by legal requirement and/or as a result of the legal code, causing lustful and self-serving (glutinous) behavior, creating greed as intention and sloth as consequence, where lawyers capitalize and promote wrathful thought for profit and gain, playing perfectly into the resultant envy promoted by entertainment, advertising, and educational institutions, all packaged up in a fervent, national pride that necessarily excludes all others in the world not of the same pretended ethnicity (nationality). Personhood is legalized sin. Personhood is spiritual death.

The poker player would never follow these self-evident Laws of Nature (God), and neither can the citizenship of the nations of mammon. To succeed in mammon, all of these must be put aside to make room for evil intent, coveting after the false god of money.

Aristotle, who apparently penned the Nicomachean Ethics, expounds on what is the nature of actions in volunteerism, what is involuntary, and what he calls the non-voluntary aspects of the dualistic nature of these behaviors, which generally reflect the Law of Nature (God) as virtue (need) and the legal, commercial drive as the excess (desire/want) and/or deficiency that is expressed by a lack thereof in each virtue. Listed below, the “mean” category signifies a natural, reasonable balance between the excess and the deficiency. Of course, the legal system as commerce seeks to exploit the excess and the deficiency of moral character, just as one would expect from the demons of legalism, of those who seek to gain and promote the purely secular, legal ideal and lifestyle of their own version of “freedom of religion,” legally meaning freedom from the Law of God (Nature), legally licensed freedom from personal responsibility towards other men and from self-government (self-control under the moral Law). What is a legal version is never the same and always opposed to that which it simulates in hypocrisy.

Here I have listed these ethical principles along with the Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language definition of each term, which also reflects the same moral ethic in Biblical terms. When reading these, it must be from the perspective that each extreme represents the two trays of a scale, whereupon that scale tips in the favor of spirituality under God (the Law of Nature) and its opposing force of secularism under legalism (fallacious logic as the law of men). Yet too much of even the spiritually minded concept may cause men to act just as foolishly as the secularist extreme of that scale. It is balance we seek, not perfection. And this balance is self-governance under God’s Law (of Nature).  However, do not be fooled by the notion that legalism offers a counter-balance to perfection. That is not its design. Its design is to tip the scale in only one direction at all times, while simulating a religious foundation of moral equivalence and manifest destiny. This is a lie told by the king of lies, by men seeking power through the destruction of your ability to self-govern, and by taking you away from God (Nature) through false denominations (empty names) of the false doctrines of corporate religion. In other words, legalism is designed to keep you at all times spiritually unbalanced. All of these expressive traits, again, are based on choice. Legalism offers no choice, while the Law of God relies only on your choice to follow It or turn away from it towards the artificial construct of a legalistic lifestyle in spiritual death.

–=–

COURAGE – noun – [Latin, the heart.] Bravery; intrepidity; that quality of mind which enables men to encounter danger and difficulties with firmness, or without fear or depression of spirits; valor; boldness; resolution. It is a constituent part of fortitude; but fortitude implies patience to bear continued suffering. Courage that grows from constitution, often forsakes a man when he has occasion for it; courage which arises from a sense of duty, acts in a uniform manner. Be strong and of good courage Deuteronomy 31:6. (Websters1828)

Concerned with Mean Excess Deficiency
fear (phobos) Courage (andreia): mean in fear and confidence First Type. Foolhardy or excessive fearlessness; is one who over indulges in fearful activities. Cowardly (deilos): exceeds in fear and is deficient in confidence
confidence (thrasos) Second Type. Rash (thrasus): exceeds in confidence

–=–

TEMPERANCE – noun – [Latin temperantia, from temper.] 1. Moderation; particularly, habitual moderation in regard to the indulgence of the natural appetites and passions; restrained or moderate indulgence; as temperance in eating and drinking; temperance in the indulgence of joy or mirth. Temperance in eating and drinking is opposed to gluttony and drunkenness, and in other indulgences, to excess. 2. Patience; calmness; sedateness; moderation of passion. He calm’d his wrath with goodly temperance. [Unusual](Websters1828)

Concerned with Mean Excess Deficiency
pleasure (hēdonē)
and pain (lupē)
Temperance (sōphrosunē) Profligacy, dissipation, etc. (akolasia) scarcely occurs, but we may call it Insensible (including a lack of empathy, happiness from doing harm)(anaisthētos)

–=–

LIBERALITY – noun – [Latin liberalitas. See Liberal.] 1. Munificence; bounty. That liberality is but cast away, which makes us borrow what we cannot pay. 2. A particular act of generosity; a donation; a gratuity. In this sense, it has the plural number. A prudent man is not impoverished by his liberalities. 3. Largeness of mind; catholicism (universalism); that comprehensiveness of mind which includes other interests beside its own, and duly estimates in its decisions the value or importance of each. It is evidence of a noble mind to judge of men and things with liberality. Many treat the gospel with indifference under the name of liberality. 4. Candor; impartiality. (Websters1828)

Concerned with Mean Excess Deficiency
giving and getting (smaller amounts of) money liberality (Rackham),
generosity (Sachs) (eleutheriotēs)
prodigality (Rackham),
wastefulness (Sachs) (asōtia)
meanness (Rackham), stinginess (Sachs) (aneleutheria)

–=–

MAGNIFICENCE – noun – [Latin magnificentia.] Grandeur of appearance; greatness and splendor of show or state; as the magnificence of a palace or of a procession; the magnificence of a Roman triumph. (Websters1828)

Concerned with Mean Excess Deficiency
giving and getting greater things Magnificence (megaloprepeia) Tastelessness (apeirokalia) or Vulgarity (banausia) Paltriness (Rackham), Chintziness (Sachs) (mikroprepeia)

–=–

MAGNANIM’ITY – noun – [Latin magnanimitas; magnus, great, and animus, mind.] Greatness of mind; that elevation or dignity of soul, which encounters danger and trouble with tranquillity and firmness, which raises the possessor above revenge, and makes him delight in acts of benevolence, which makes him disdain injustice and meanness, and prompts him to sacrifice personal ease, interest and safety for the accomplishment of useful and noble objects. (Websters1828)

Concerned with Mean Excess Deficiency
great honor (timē) and dishonor Greatness of Soul (megalopsuchia)
(Traditional translation “magnanimity”. Sometimes “pride”.)
Vanity (chaunotēs) Smallness of Soul (self-hatred)(mikropsuchia)

–=–

AMBITION – noun – [Latin ambitio, from ambio, to go about, or to seek by making interest, of amb, about, and eo, to go. See Ambages. This word had its origin in the practice of Roman candidates for office, who went about the city to solicit votes.] A desire of preferment, or of honor; a desire of excellence or superiority. It is used in a good sense; as, emulation may spring from a laudable ambition. It denotes also an inordinate desire of power, or eminence, often accompanied with illegal means to obtain the object. It is sometimes followed by of; as, a man has an ambition of wit. Milton has used the word in the Latin sense of going about, or attempting; but this sense is hardly legitimate. (Websters1828)

Concerned with Mean Excess Deficiency
lesser honor (timē) and dishonor no special term in ancient Greek for the right amount of ambition Over-ambitiousness) (philotimos) lack of ambition (aphilotimos)

–=–

GENTLENESS noun – [See Gentle.] Dignity of birth. [Little used.] 1. Genteel behavior. 2. Softness of manners; mildness of temper; sweetness of disposition; meekness. The fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, long suffering, gentlenessgoodness, faith. Galatians 5:223. Kindness; benevolence. 4. Tenderness; mild treatment. (Websters1828)

Concerned with Mean Excess Deficiency
anger (orgē) Gentleness (praotēs) Irascibility (Rackham), Irritability (Sachs) (orgilotēs) Spiritlessness (aorgẽsia)

–=–

FRIENDLINESS – noun – 1. A disposition to friendship; friendly disposition. 2. Exertion of benevolence or kindness. (Websters1828)

Concerned with Mean Excess Deficiency
general pleasantness in life Friendliness (something like philia) First Type. obsequious (areskos), if for no purpose quarrelsome (duseris) and surly (duskolos) (contrarian)
Second type. flatterer (kolax), if for own advantage

–=–

TRUTHFUL – adjective – Full of truth. (Websters1828)

TRUTH – noun – 1. Conformity to fact or reality; exact accordance with that which is, or has been, or shall be. The truth of history constitutes its whole value. We rely on the truth of the scriptural prophecies. My mouth shall speak truth. Proverbs 8:7. Sanctify them through thy truth; thy word is truth. John 17:172. True state of facts or things. The duty of a court of justice is to discover the truth. Witnesses are sworn to declare the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth 3. Conformity of words to thoughts, which is called moral truth. Shall truth fail to keep her word? 4. Veracity; purity from falsehood; practice of speaking truth; habitual disposition to speak truth; as when we say, a man is a man of truth. 5. Correct opinion. 6. Fidelity; constancy. The thoughts of past pleasure and truth. 7. Honesty; virtue. It must appear, That malice bears down truth. 8. Exactness; conformity to rule. Plows, to go true, depend much on the truth of the iron work. [Not in use.] 9. Real fact of just principle; real state of things. There are innumerable truths with which we are not acquainted. 10. Sincerity… 13. It is sometimes used by way of concession… That is, it is a truth; what you have said, I admit to be true. In truth in reality; in fact. Of a truth in reality; certainly. To do truth is to practice what God commands. John 3. (Websters1828)

Concerned with Mean Excess Deficiency
truth (alēthēs) Truthfulness (alētheia) Boastfulness: pretense as exaggeration (alazoneia) Self-deprecation: pretense as understatement (eironia, same word as “irony“)

–=–

WITTY – adjective – [from wit.] 1. Possessed of wit; full of wit; as a witty poet. 2. Judicious; ingenious; inventive. 3. Sarcastic; full of taunts. (Websters1828)

WIT – verb intransitive – [G., to know. See Wise.] To know. This verb is used only in the infinitive, to wit namely, that is to say. [Latin] – noun [See the verb and Wise.] 1. Primarily, the intellect; the understanding or mental powers. Will puts in practice what the wit deviseth. For wit and power their last endeavors bend to outshine each other. 2. The association of ideas in a manner natural, but unusual and striking, so as to produce surprise joined with pleasure. wit is defined. What oft was thought, but neer so well expressed. Wit consists in assembling and putting together with quickness, ideas in which can be found resemblance and congruity, by which to make up pleasant pictures and agreeable visions in the fancy. Wit consists chiefly in joining things by distant and fanciful relations, which surprise us because they are unexpected. Wit is a propriety of thoughts and words; or in other terms, thoughts and words elegantly adapted to the subject. 3. The faculty of associating ideas in a new and unexpected manner. 4. A man of genius; as, the age of Addison abounded with wits. A wit herself, Amelia weds a wit. 5. A man of fancy or wit. Intemperate wits will spare neither friend nor foe. 6. Sense; judgment. He wants not wit the danger to decline. 7. Faculty of the mind. 8. Wits, in the plural, soundness of mind; intellect not disordered; sound mind. No man in his wits would venture on such an expedition. Have you lost your wits? Is he out of his wits? 9. Power of invention; contrivance; ingenuity. He was at his wits end. (Websters1828)

CHARMING – participle present tense – 1. Using charms; enchanting. 2. adjective – Pleasing in the highest degree; delighting. Music is but an elegant and charming species of elocution. (Websters1828)

CHARM – noun – 1. Words, characters or other things imagined to possess some occult or unintelligible power; hence, a magic power or spell, by which with the supposed assistance of the devil, witches and sorcerers have been supposed to do wonderful things. Spell; enchantment. Hence, 2. That which has power to subdue opposition, and gain the affections; that which can please irresistible; that which delights and attracts the heart; generally in the plural. The smiles of nature and the charms of art. Good humor only teaches charms to last.  verb transitive – 1. To subdue or control by incantation or secret influence. I will send serpents among you – which will not be charmed. Jeremiah 8:172. To subdue by secret power, especially by that which pleases and delights the mind; to allay, or appease. Music the fiercest grief can charm. 3. To give exquisite pleasure to the mind or senses; to delight. We were charmed with the conversation. The aerial songster charms us with her melodious notes. 4. To fortify with charms against evil. I have a charmed life, which must not yield. 5. To make powerful by charms. 6. To summon by incantation. 7. To temper agreeably. – verb intransitive – To sound harmonically. (Websters1828)

Concerned with Mean Excess Deficiency
pleasantness and social amusement Wittiness (Rackham)

Charming (Sachs) (eutrapelos)

Buffoonery (bõmolochia) Boorishness (bõmolochos)

–=–

For further outline and elaboration of these ten books containing these virtues and their excess or deficiency from neutrality (middle, mean, balanced state), see the wiki article, here:

Link–> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicomachean_Ethics

–=–

It is easy to confuse these terms with their legal opposites, word magic that is designed to simulate the form without the substance, to pretend good while acting badly. As an example, the legal system bestows the legal (false), flattering title of “honor” upon politicians and judges, as well as titles of supposed (pretended) nobility. One need not do anything special to be granted the flattering title of nobility, one may simply be born into it. Or, one may be hired on to the government corporations and be given such a legal title, which is a specifically defined term of art that has nothing to do with acting in honor in any way. This simulation (hypocrisy) is the nature of The Matrix story and movie franchise — a society so enamored in false, flattering titles that not one of us acts according to the title we pretend to bear. For while the words simulation and hypocrisy bear (carry) the same meaning, they are the products of very different intents. Hypocrisy is committed by a man that knows the Law of God (Nature) and continues knowingly and thus consciously to break that Law. But society today is in simulation, not hypocrisy. Simulation is committed by a man that does not know the Law of God except by name (form without substance), confused by legalism and false doctrine of state-sponsored religions, and therefore acts unknowingly and unconsciously to break the Law of God (Nature).

Which is worse? Why hypocrisy, of course, knowingly breaking the Law of Nature (God).

Which is more destructive? That would be simulation, for a simulator knows and acknowledges not his own hypocrisy, being inculturated and brainwashed by secular logic (legalism) and thus tricked into contract with the devils (attorneys/agents) of government – injured (brought into legal law) and submitted to a spiritually dead existence absent from Source (Nature). One that is ignorant, though this be no excuse, cannot be called a hypocrite. But he can be called evil, pernicious, and wanting of moral rectitude, as much as any farm animal might be labeled. For both exist in their own matrix simulation, an existence completely separate from Nature (Reality). One thing, however, is certainly clear… The ignorant simulators must be governed, for they cannot govern themselves if they do not know the Law of Nature (God). Trying to self-govern without God, without Logos (Christ, the Word of God personified), is like entering into a battle without a sword or shield. The piercing effect of legalism and mammon corrupts the empty mind, the mind devoid of knowledge. And we are certainly a people destroyed by our disgusting and purposeful lack of knowledge, our active ignorance.

(Author’s note: I just revealed the subject outline of my next book.)

It must be said that not any one of these virtues listed above can be obtained without the others. Each is like a check and balance upon which the others depend. For instance, one might be very witty and yet, without empathy, that is, without having temperance over ones words or actions, ones wit will certainly do harm to another or to oneself (self-deprecation). This dispensation of virtue is akin to having a shield against those seven deadly sins that the legal system thrives upon and invokes in each of us through its artificial matrix code. And so the worst of men rise to the top while the best of us are cowed and prevented from practicing this religious Law of virtuous ethics as religious men (non-persons). To be clear, the Law of Nature (God) is illegal in the legal system of men, for that is the purpose of having freedom from (of) religion, which means a state of possessing legal freedom from moral Law. Following the Law of God religiously is not a religion, it is conscious action and a fear of hypocrisy. The religions of men in no way require any man to follow the Law of God, and in fact require every man to break with God’s Law, the Law of Nature, in order to join and follow whatever false doctrine that “church” has printed, incorporated, and made legal (anti-God). Religion is steeped in and dependent on simulation and hypocrisy, for all its members and clergy must necessarily fall into one of these categories.

It is no irony that by doing no harm one therefore rises above and takes away all power of the legal governments of men, leaving the dealer (government) of the game without dependent, morally corrupted customers, without support, without players (citizen employees) in its organized, extortive, commercial business practices. A king, a government, and a poker dealer (tax collector) are useless and powerless actors without the multitude of weak-minded men paying them tribute by participating in their legal, permissive, monopolistic games so as to be harmful and be harmed as a defunct (spiritually dead), default lifestyle. Therefore, the legal system and its devilish law allows for, protects, and very much promotes injury and harm. To injure literally means to bring someone, some place, or some thing into law, and this usually means harm must be done to that legal (artificial) person (status), place (corporation), or thing (property). Though these are merely fictions of law (nouns/names), these pretended titles play an intricate role in this process, for they are all patented creations and property of government. The creator controls, as their well-established, ancient, legal maxim of law dictates. In other words, God controls Nature (including man) and Its Law, while governments control fiction (including the legal persons, places, and things of men) and the legal law that controls them. Through the fictional person, the man is controlled. Within the fictional place (legal jurisdiction of a municipal corporation) the person is governed (administrated). And through every false, legal claim of any thing as “property” by the fictional legal person in the fictional legal place, the man is therefore claiming that he or she holds “title” through some creation (persona) of government, and therefore the law of persons, places, and things is the highest – a false law held higher than Nature’s (God’s) Law. Ultimately this means that anyone that violates or trespasses upon that lie of fictionally entitled property must be punished, that is, harmed through extortion and pain. Forgiveness is not tolerated by we that justify, tolerate, and even worship patriotically this legal system, pretending God’s realm of Nature no longer exists when covered by a fictional, legal “property” line (artificial border) — that the Law of God’s Nature is equally defeated within that artificial boundary of legalism. Therefore, no moral action will be tolerated from any man because it’s illegal (intolerable) for a man bearing (using) a legal person (legal status) under and controlled (owned) by government to practice any form of True religious freedom (bound under moral, unwritten Law). What is legally written remains instead the foundational lie in which we trust.

A person (legal status) exists only in the legal fiction system (a fictional simulation created through legal code words), no differently than a Monopoly game game-piece only has power and status in the Monopoly game or a pawn or knight only has status as a pawn in the game of chess, being a useless trinket in Truth, that is, in Nature (under God), and having power only through the permissive (licensed) fiction that is man’s legal system of law. And so a man acting as/in legal persona (false character) can only act according to the law of persons, the law of the legal, commercial game, never the spiritual, moral Law of Nature (God). In other words, a man must tolerate everything that the government’s legal system of law requires its fictional persons (property) to tolerate, while inversely showing forced, equal, collective intolerance towards whatever government requires and considers as legally intolerable. Morals, values, spirituality, and just outright common sense are intolerable in any legal system. Why? Because these actions (not just thoughts) cannot be governed through legal means, only suppressed through rules attached to this persona (status in society). Only harm can be legally governed. And like a parasite, a vampiric ghoul, government capitalizes upon and taxes every instance of harm we do to one another, even going so far as to fill our heads with Hollywood (deceitful) entertainment that constantly promotes and features as “reality television” a host of paid, low-level, professional liars (actors) fulfilling quite scripted acts of competition and harm.

This is no game, this is the way of Nature (Jehovah). This is our actual default. Only the legal fiction prevents us from living Truly amongst one another in Love and Charity. And that fiction was created purposefully to destroy our spiritual release, our ability to Love and cherish each other as Real men, as Creations of God (Nature), entraining, educating, and tricking us into playing instead their legal game of monopolies (nations) by their artifices and false laws.

If this still doesn’t make sense, try and imagine a moral Monopoly or chess game for a moment, where the Highest rule of the game is to do no harm to any other player (man) or to the earth (Nature), where all “places” are only property of God and no other. Imagine playing Monopoly without money, without a banker (false god). Imagine if the dice had no power to move you and force you to harm (trespass) because you had no fictional character that, by the artificial (legal/man-made) law of that game, could control you through contract, bond, violence, and surety. Imagine having the Natural right and ability to travel through each pretended square of land because no legal system prevented it, and because the Law of the game is to do no harm, to forgive us our trespasses, and to love and respect one another as our neighbor and as we would expect to have done to ourselves? While this is the default Law of Nature, or in other words, what exists without the artifices of legal properties (persons, places, and things), it is only possible by conscious application (choice). It is only possible without temptation towards mammon (money and false valuation of what is Real as a fiction/name in commerce). It is only possible by men able to govern their own minds and actions, by men that hold the Highest Law not merely as a pretended belief system (religion) under a false corporate title like “Christian,” but as a lifestyle put into action at every moment of every new day. What games would we play if there was no competition? What wonders could we accomplish? What level of True Love could we experience?

Unfortunately, these questions cannot be answered while men are contracted with the dis-ease of legal personhood (status) under a false law, while inside the simulation of the legal matrix code and while entranced by the artifice of false, legally incorporated religions (belief without action). For the member of any religion is merely a citizen thereof, no different than that of a citizen of any nation, unable to ever act upon any moral law purveyed within that religion because that religion is a legal corporation bound wholly under legal law (IRS code), and the man attending that religious ceremony (game) is a legal citizen under legal (anti-God, anti-Nature) law. He that pretends, acts, and preaches falsely has no place in God’s Nature (Creation). The chess piece has no power except upon the chess board. The cartoon only exists in the cartoon realm. One cannot be a follower of the Law of God (exemplified in the story of Jesus Christ, the Law personified) and also pretend to be a legal person bound under legal law (false, antichrist doctrine). Each religion is a Monopoly board of its own, allowing empty belief in idols but preventing the ability of men to practice any moral actions as Law without license and permission from government. This false charity from religions can only serve to keep the poor in poverty, to fill the neglected belly of the hungry temporarily, without satisfaction, and provide only the illusion of shelter and love not as a duty to God, but as a gesture of empty, corporate greed (lust). Any welfare system provided by the corporate church serves only to support poverty, hunger, and homelessness, no less than the welfare system of the legal, corporate state serves only the continued base poverty level of its recipients. For money-based, corporate charity bound in anti-God legalism can never cure the ills of a society that worships and hoards the empty promise of money as its artificial god.

Government is only words on paper, and these words (false laws) are used by actors (politicians, police, etc.) in artificially flattering titles as justification to harm and injure the men who respect and therefore tolerate them as if their titles and legally licensed powers thereof are part of reality. This invisible badge of moral corruption, a public scarlet letter of moral incorrigibility called personhood (legalized adultery) and national US citizenship is expressed every time that status (legal, artificial persona) is invoked through identity (pretended sameness as a fictional character/name), such as showing a driver’s license or using a social security number. The law applies only to the person (fictional status), but the man acting in person is in a permanent state of injury (bound under legal law and sanction) by continued, assumed, permanent use (expression) of that persona (status) and the protection it tacitly imposes, being in bond and surety as a consequence of using another’s (government’s) property. Legal protectionism, that is, giving up liberty for security, replacing the choice of self-government with a legalistic prison in debt, is never a good thing.

And now, suddenly, the purpose of Thomas Jefferson’s quote above can be clearly understood. Your rulers use the premise of this quote against you, by causing you to abandon your natural (“God-given”) rights in exchange for their contracted dis-ease of legal, artificial rights. The devil (evil genius/attorneys) can only effect you when you get into contract with it. Legalism is intolerable to innocence. Satan requires harm be done so that its anti-God legalist law may govern and administrate that harm. With time or with money (which are the same thing), we all pay in the end.

Governments only have power over men that are weak-minded, ignorant, and warlike, men that cannot govern themselves, men that deny their own power and existence under God (in Nature/Reality). This unnatural state of being is purely a learned, societal behavior fomented on the “public” at large, for one cannot control (govern) he that is self-governing, unless that government first steals that man’s spiritual release and ability to practice any form of moral (unwritten, self-evident) Law. This is the absolute power behind the legal systems of men, a distinct lack of recognition and respect of the Law of Nature, the Law of God, and therefore the “God-given Rights” so often spoken about by the men that create governments. However, while they are happy to reserve these rights for themselves, the rest of us must be made to deny them and harm each other as a customary, common (vulgar) lifestyle in order that we may be ruled by the legalistic (man-made) rules of harm. We thrive on injury, because only through injury may we invoke and utilize the legal system. Without harm, it has no purpose. It cannot exist in a charitable society. It cannot thrive when forgiveness is the law. And it cannot control us unless we treat each other without love, as if we are not each other’s neighbors to love as we love ourselves. When our actions are no longer answerable only to Jehovah but to men pretending to be gods (magistrates/judges), then we no longer have Natural (God-given) rights. The second we invoke the legal system and law of men, we abandon all that is of God (Nature, the Universe), all that is the benefit of living in and speaking at all times the Truth. For God is Truth and the keeper of It. In other words, if we act like Lawless (soulless) animals then we shall be treated like Lawless (soulless) animals.

Governments, however, are not Truth. Governments exist and subsist solely on lies, on their own fictional inventions, and according to their own law. We seem to forget that every government in existence is immune from its own system of law, standing in the legal title of self-proclaimed, artificial, pretended sovereignty over its own property, its own false creation, including the persons (status in society) we pretend to be. We are told that we are each individually sovereign and yet also somehow subject to government, a blatant misnomer bordering on paradox. A man of God has only one Sovereign and it is never himself, for to have Natural (God-given) rights is to recognize Nature, that is the Universe as all True and self-evident Existence as a whole, as man’s only God (Sovereign). Nature is the only Truth. Truth is God. God is Truth. All else is manmade, and what is manmade is never Truth, never part of God, never part of or governed by Nature and Its Law. Therefore, what is manmade, including what we call persons or citizenship, is a lie. A lie is always against Truth. A lie is always against God’s Law. Lies are never part of Nature, thus never part of God. In other words, Truth is self-evident, and so Truth is the keeper of Itself, for Truth is the Nature and Law of the Universe (Jehovah). Man is part of Nature (God), part of Truth, and ultimately governed by Truth (Nature and Its Law), and so nothing manmade can be said to be part of God, for nothing manmade is part of (originated from) Nature (the Source of Truth). This is the essential foundation of law. Words are never Truth, only form without substance and without self-evidence. The Word of God is the Law of Truth, the Law (Logos) is the Son of God (Truth). The Word is the Law is the Son… these words carry the same meaning and Source. Whenever Truth is spoken, this is the Word of God. That which emanates Truth is acting in or speaking the Word of God, and is acting as a son of God, for God (Jehovah) is Truth. And one can self-evidently only have one True Origin, one Source, one Sovereign (God). All others are false (respected lies). This understanding does not require a degree, or even an education. It needs no religion or money-hungry, lust-addicted priest. It is a fundamental, self-evident Truth. It is the foundation of all Law, for the legal law only exists as that which is opposed to Truth. Life is spiritual Truth. Legal fiction is spiritual death. All persons (legal status under government) are fictions of law. All persons are dead. Persons are not of God, not Created from Nature (Universal Source). Persons are words, form without substance. Persons are Soulless…

If you think this is religion, you are hopelessly lost in the throws of legally imposed, active ignorance… dazed, and confused by the firm and fast grip of your lovelorn lips upon the teat of the false, legal gods of government (mammon).

—=—

“There is nothing more frightening than active ignorance.”

—Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

—=—

“We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light.” 

―Plato

—=—

“There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that ‘my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.” 

―Issac Asimov 

—=—

“There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn’t true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true.” 

―Soren Kierkegaard

—=—

“We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.” 

―Benjamin Franklin

—=—

“The hardest thing to explain is the glaringly evident which everybody has decided not to see.” 

―Ayn Rand, The Fountainhead

—=—

“Five percent of the people think; 
ten percent of the people think they think; 
and the other eighty-five percent would rather die than think.” 

―Thomas A. Edison

—=—

“But you can’t make people listen.
They have to come round in their own time,
wondering what happened and why the world blew up around them…

―Ray Bradbury, Fahrenheit 451

—=—

“Being ignorant is not so much a shame, as being unwilling to learn.”

―Benjamin Franklin

—=—

“An age is called Dark, not because the light fails to shine, but because people refuse to see it.”

―James A. Michener

—=—

“To surrender to ignorance and call it God has always been premature, and it remains premature today. Faith is the great cop-out, the great excuse to evade the need to think and evaluate evidence. Faith is the belief in spite of, even perhaps because of, the lack of evidence.”

―Richard Dawkins

(Author’s Note: I do not adhere to Dawkins gibberish, and would give my left nut to “debate” him, that is, educate him and his hopeless cult-following on his fallacious rhetoric and active ignorance of the Bible story and purpose. But a Truth as this, spoken by any man, cannot be ignored lest one becomes ones own enemy. His words regard only empty, corporate religions and their flatteringly-titled followers, not the self-evidence of the Truths in the Bible. His whole pedestal relies on the “strawman argument” fallacy, arguing against the false gods/idolatry and empty images that corporate “Christians” and other religions believe faithfully without proof instead of correcting those false beliefs and instructing them in the Truth of the Bible. In this way, Dawkins is not a Truth-teller but an adversary to the Truth (God). Jehovah (God) is self-evident Truth, against which there is no debating, no versions, and is not to be confused with of defined or likened to false gods and idols. Jehovah is defined as self-Evidence, self-Existence, the Universe, Nature and Its Law, of which we are all undeniably part of in Oneness. The atheist can only exist because false religions exist. The atheist argument is only against some other man’s imagination, not the Bible Law read in proper context and understanding of the intent of its language and metaphor. Dawkins is the “fool” so often referred to therein, just as I was for believing his and other’s fallacious rhetoric instead of reading and committing to due diligence regarding the Bible. His comment above only applies to men tricked into believing the false, manmade doctrines and empty images of denominated, corporate, legalized religions, and has nothing to do with the Bible itself.)

—=—

Let us be clear that the story of Jesus Christ is a timeless (non-historical) story about the most intolerant dude I can think of, violently overturning the tables of the moneychangers and abhorring all men (fools) that acted and spoke against God’s Law, the Law of Nature, the self-evident Truth. Let us also be clear that Jesus Christ is the story of you, and me, the example of God’s Law, the Law of Nature we are to follow — haters of lies, artifice, and legal fiction, and intolerable to everything not of Truth (Jehovah). No one can possibly read the Bible as Law (doctrine) while at the same time thinking so-called “Christian” thoughts about the world (globalized, institutionalized, unspiritual secularism) around us. Christ tolerated no abhorrent behavior, constantly chastising and slyly convicting all “fools” and “hypocrites” that pretended (simulated), as many of us similarly do today, to be men of God (followers of God’s Law). Nothing in the Bible (Law) promotes tolerance. In fact, the very idea of tolerance is by its nature completely against the purpose of any and every system of law, save perhaps the corrupt legal systems of men that seek socialism, communism, and in general Orwellian despotism.

Tolerance is literally moral anarchy, that is, lawlessness to all sense of morality, and poisonous to any sort of spiritually driven values any people may collectively share — the very reason for creating a legitimate (Lawful) government. In other words, once the delusion of enforced, legalized tolerance (permission-based, protected, abhorrent behaviors and lifestyles) infiltrates what otherwise was “constituted” to be an otherwise intolerant society of men that base their participation in that society firstly on a Higher, unwritten, spiritually driven purpose, all hope of maintaining an unwritten, unspoken, unenforced moral order is diminished if not crushed, and such moral behavior is even outlawed by the legalist platform of protectionism (license) for bad behavior.

—=—

“…Shouldest thou help the ungodly, and love them that hate the LORD (Jehovah)? therefore is wrath upon thee from before the LORD (Jehovah)… Take heed what ye do: for ye judge not for man, but for the LORD (Jehovah), who is with you in the judgment… for there is no iniquity with the LORD our God, nor respect of persons, nor taking of gifts… Thus shall ye do in the fear of the LORD, faithfully, and with a perfect heart.”

–2 Chronicles 19:2

—=—

The natural (common/lower class) man is a spiritual monster. His heart is where his feet should be, fixed upon the earth; his heels are lifted up against heaven, which his heart should be set on. His face is towards hell; his back towards heaven. He loves what he should hate, and hates what he should love; joys in what he ought to mourn for, and mourns for what he ought to rejoice in; glories in his shame, and is ashamed of his glory; abhors what he should desire, and desires what he should abhor.”

—Thomas Boston, quoted from: ‘Augustus Toplady, Complete Works’

—=—

To tolerate the existence of evil in men is not the same as tolerating the evils emulated in their behavior. One is to act in charity and love to all men, to tolerate them in their ignorance and deprivation, but never to allow or justify it, and certainly not to love it. The verse above explains that much of the evil of men comes from their status in society, their person. The person acts not under God’s Law but under the government (mind control) of a false god (men acting as gods/magistrates). Love the man as God’s Creation, but never the fictional persona (mask) he pretends to be.

To legalize tolerance is to make lawful that which is intolerable. To legalize tolerance, that is, to force “citizens” to accept all creeds and lifestyles in false, forced legally sanctioned equality, is to abandon the Source of Law that would otherwise allow good men to fight against that evil. In every case throughout written history, this institutionalized tolerance has but one causal effect — to cause good, moral men to become intolerable to the secularized society created by the enforced tolerance thereof. He that refuses legalized, forced tolerance of that which is immoral must necessarily be labeled as intolerable. It is this phenomenon that we are witnessing in America today, and ultimately in all “first-world” nations around the world. It is this tolerance of evil, this bearing of false love for the deadly sins of men due to their false, legally protected persona, that is the antichrist spirit.

One example of this destructive toleration can be seen in what is called as “modern” or “impressionist” art. When the artist no longer paints the world according to its True beauty and wonder, no longer wishing to extend in his art the glory and harshness of Truth, and instead chooses to reinvent Reality (Creation) from his own palate of demented, alternative perspective or some drug-induced “impressionist” revisionism, we have the perfect example of the spiritual degradation that subsists through unrestricted tolerance, and indeed the protective admiration and promotion of tolerable immorality.

—=—

But it’s the consequences of such universally established tolerance in a legalist, secularized society that are the focus of this short essay. For with such a learned, propagandized, and subsequently violently enforced legalistic tolerance shrouded upon a once morally-driven people, whose spiritual foundation and standing in the Law of Nature (God) against what is otherwise intolerable has ultimately been cowed by such licensure of permissive, illicit behavior and idolatry — this once strong foundation of like-minded people must necessarily become intolerant even toward the expression of their own, natural, moral instinct. We must deny the Truth and accept what is false. Such toxic, societal (legal) tolerance causes immorality in the actions of all men regardless of their upbringing and dissuasiveness from their knowledge and baser instinct, causing a legally-induced, almost helpless automation of the man under the false law of forced permissiveness of all that is against reason, stultifying every “citizen” (employee/agent) into inaction and eventually into a shameful feeling of powerlessness, worthlessness, and helplessness as a normal state of mind.

Nineteen Eighty-Four (as Orwell presented) is not merely an inevitable future but a predictive programming of exactly what has incrementally been happening to us, here and now. Good men are afraid to stand up against such oppressive, fallacious public outcries and politically-driven catcalls as “anti-semitic” or “racist,” silenced by social justice campaigns designed to do nothing more than stifle any debate and suppress reasonable consideration. To those acting intolerably, those tolerating evils, their acts of non-toleration through the silencing of any moral opposition is golden. Once tolerance of evil becomes law, only then may evil reign, their actions governed strictly (without choice) by the legalist devils (attorneys) that protect and represent them. And, of course, this is all by design. For the very purpose for this word “racism,” a term and concept that simply cannot be found in older dictionaries or in societal history, is for the purposes of selective intolerance hidden behind the logical fallacy of the goodness of socialistically ingrained, universal tolerance.

 

—=—

So if all black people get organized as a group of flatteringly titled “black” people (an artificial “black” persona/mask/status), which must necessarily be non-white or any other skin-color, they can then collectively as “black” persons fight racism? But, wait a minute, isn’t that the definition of racism? Wasn’t that the model of America — to create a “white” (pure-blooded) country that enslaved “black” (tainted blood) persons of any skin color? Wasn’t America a bunch of “white” European persons (pure bloodline families) that came together in “solidarity” to form a country that necessarily excluded non-pure-blooded men no matter what the skin-color?

Is this race denial? Is it race shame? The strange thing is that this manipulative social justice movement has nothing at all to do with ending this left over, eugenically-driven racial hatred, that is, hatred between the so-called races, but rather to promote a hatred of the distinction of race itself, a sort of collective delusion of self-hatred and self-denial. In other words, we are being ingrained and inculturated to consider race (family) itself as intolerable — exactly what one would expect from a United Nations world government that wishes to replace the family unit with globalist, corporate feudalism and the state as parens patriae.

—=—

“The state has a wide range of power for limiting parental freedom and authority in things affecting the child’s welfare… In fact, the entire familial relationship involves the State.”

The primary control and custody of infants is with the government.”

“There is no wider area for the exercise of judicial discretion than that of providing for and protecting the best interests of children.”

“The court stands in the position of parens patria[e] of children.”

Parens patriae,” literally “parent of the country,” refers traditionally to role of state as sovereign and guardian of persons under legal disability.”

“Pursuant to the parens patriae doctrine, ‘the primary control and custody of infants is with the government, to be delegated, as of course, to their natural guardians and protectors, so long as such guardians are suitable persons to exercise it.’ ”

“In other words, the state is the father and mother of the child and the natural parents are not entitled to custody, except upon the state’s beneficent recognition that natural parents presumably will be the best of its citizens to delegate its custodial powers… ‘The law devolves the custody of infant children upon their parents, not so much upon the ground of natural right in the latter, as because the interests of the children, and the good of the public, will, as a general rule, be thereby promoted.’ 

–Prince, 321 U.S. at 167, 64 S.Ct. at 442, 88 L.Ed. 645. (SOURCE: FindLaw’s Appellate Court of Illinois case and opinions.) -and- MEADOWS v. MEADOWS, (Aug 2008), in the “Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama”?Tillman V. Roberts. 108 So. 62; Ex parte Handley, 460 So.2d 167 (Ala.1984). -and- –Ex parte Wright, 225 Ala. 220, 222, 142 So. 672, 674 (1932). See also Fletcher v. Preston, 226 Ala. 665, 148 So. 137 (1933); and Striplin v. Ware, 36 Ala. 87 (1860), -and- Ex parte Bayliss, 550 So.2d 986, 988 n. 1 (Ala.1989) (quoting Black’s Law Dictionary 1003 (5th ed.1979)). -and- Chandler v. Whatley, 238 Ala. 206, 208, 189 So. 751, 753 (1939) (quoting Striplin v. Ware, 36 Ala. at 89) (‘ ’). (SOURCE: FindLaw’s Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama case and opinions.)

—=—

Get it? The word public means corporation (artificial family) of lower class common men (goyim) acting in legal persona because of lack of knowledge and therefore inability to govern ourselves. The nation is a corporation, and the United Nations is a bunch of nations placed under the same matrix code. But what you might not know is that another word for corporation is FAMILY — as in surrogate parent under the doctrine of master and servant (also called as volunteerism). In the terms below, the word “pleasure” when used legally means legal use of a benefit, which implies the contractual relationship between person (agent) and the state (principal). So when your son takes a joy ride, it’s always considered corporate (family) business, and the head of the corporation (family) is the responsible party for any damages…

FAMILY GROUP – Within purview of the family car doctrine, is not confined to persons related to the owner, but includes members of the collective body of persons living in his household for whose convenience the car is maintained and who have authority to use it. The children of trust settlor including an adult son are members of the settlor’s “family group” for income tax purposes. (Black4)

FAMILY USE – That use ordinarily made by and suitable for the members of a household whether as individuals or collectively. The supply of water in a municipal corporation for family use includes the supply of jails, hospitals, almshouses, schools, and other municipal institutions; id. (Black4)

MEMBEROne of the persons constituting a family; a partnership, association, corporation, guild, etc. One of the persons constituting a court, a legislative assembly, etc. A part or organ of the animal body; especially a limb or other separate part. (Black4)

FAMILY PURPOSE DOCTRINE – A doctrine that the owner of a car, who gives it over to the use of his family and permits it to be operated by the members thereof, is liable for the injuries inflicted while being operated by a member of the family. The doctrine, that the owner of an automobile purchased or maintained for the pleasure of his family is liable for injuries inflicted by the machine while being used by the members of the family for their own pleasure. The doctrine imputes relationship of principal and agent where one maintains an automobile for pleasure or other use of member of his family. It is based on theory that each family member in using such car for own pleasure is carrying out the purpose for which it is furnished, and is the owner’s agent or servant. It is founded upon principles of agency or of master and servant. It is restricted to automobiles maintained by owner for comfort, pleasure, and convenience of members of his family. A father is not liable merely because he is head of family, but the one who owns or provides the automobile is liable. A wife may be held liable for the torts of her husband under the doctrine. Agency is the very genesis of the doctrine. Grandmother standing in loco parentis to grandson was liable under the doctrine for grandson’s negligent operation of her automobile. Where wife owned automobile, husband was not liable under “family purpose doctrine,” for minor son’s negligent operation of the automobile, notwithstanding husband paid part of gasoline and garage bills… (Black4)

FAMILY CAR DOCTRINE – The doctrine rests upon the basis that the automobile is furnished by the husband in his individual capacity and as common-law head of the family for the use of the family, and not as the agent of the community. It rests on theory that operator is husband’s agent and runs automobile in husband’sbusiness”; that wife is husband’s agent in carrying out one of the purposes for which the automobile is purchased and owned. Under the doctrine, a father furnishing automobile for pleasure and convenience of family makes the use of automobile by family his business and any member of family driving automobile with father’s express or implied consent is the father’s agent and the father is liable for the member’s negligence. See, also, Family Automobile Doctrine and Family Purpose Doctrine. (Black4)

FAMILY AUTOMOBILE DOCTRINE – The doctrine is that one who owns and maintains an automobile for the general use of his household makes use of automobile for such purposes a part of his business so that any member using automobile for those purposes under general authority to do so becomes his representative, for whose negligence he is responsible. It is an extension of the principle of respondeat superior to the relation created by operation of family use automobile. See, also, Family Car Doctrine and Family Purpose Doctrine. It is based on theory that members of family were engaged in a joint enterprise or that child was agent of parents. If an automobile is owned and maintained by a family corporation for general use of a family, such as that of corporation’s manager and one of its principal stockholders, corporation may be held liable under thefamily automobile doctrineto third parties. (Black4)

FAMILY CARAutomobile used to send owner’s children to school was “family car.” (Black4)

—=—

Yes, dropping the kids off at school in the “family car” is considered an act (benefit) of commerce, done in legal persona (citizenship), as the head of or agent (member) of a legal family of US persons (a legal marriage is the incorporation of two fictional, legal persons that are both property of the state). This is the family (artificially ethnic race) of the United States, all 300+ million of us — a family (corporation) born (birthed) without love and borne (carried) through great deceit and deception. The state (national district) is the father of its national citizenships.

And now you know why the scoundrels that started the United States were called as its “fathers” (false gods), and why the Bible insists that no man call any other but Jehovah (God) as “father.”

This artificial, national family (incorporation of persons) represents a politically-driven destruction of the recognition and proudness of heritage, family history, and age-old values. It’s what one might call the New World Order (international secularism), where all men identify as fictional (legal) persons and all such fictional persons are property (corporate employees called legally as sons and daughters) of the nation (family corporation).

The false paradigm we call as racism, or what is the modernly naked, left-over, legalistic “race” classifications of the original eugenics movement used without understanding today and therefore without reason or logic behind it, as a recognition of race detached from any actual family (bloodline/heraldic) considerations, being a mostly modern construct created by Darwin’s evolutionary charting of nonsensical traits and size variations of human skulls and intelligence quotients, indeed has an organized, sinister, secular-humanist goal that is not the imaginary, fairy-tail color-blindness promoted through televised hatred and logical fallacy we see and hear all over the “news” and as entertainment on social media. Rather, this so-called racism is a being served up as a deliciously delusional blindness to reality, to the beautiful Truth of Nature, as an institutionalized arrogance and indifference to God’s Design. Race (family) has nothing to do with it, except for the intention to destroy the True meaning of that word race in the minds of men, until it is unrecognizable as a good thing… or even acknowledgeable in public and political forums as a self-evident Truth.

In case you haven’t put the pieces together yet, legal “equality” is the direct opposite of race (family). In other words, equality = incorporation. Equality is necessary to destroy actual race, that is, to destroy the Real (bloodline) family unit, in order to cause all men to identify as legal entities instead of men of God (Nature), as equalized and thus normalized national citizens — artificial sons and daughters (persons) of the nation. This methodical averaging of the brain activity of children is much like the equalizer on a sound board or stereo, where all the frequency quotients can be flattened to the same level of unique output (zero), while certain individually wanted or preferred tones or traits can be notched up to acquire the desired effect. Before certain political groups or classes can be given more rights than all the other equally normalized citizenships, the group as a whole must be made to believe they are equal, even to the point of being required to hide or not to express those differences, be they knowledge or skill-based. Once the population is flattened, only then can a minority group be made to stand out and become unequal. There is no equality without inequity, for without that which is unequal to that which is forcibly declared and entrained to be equal there would be nothing to compare said label of equality to. In other words, to create a middle or lower class there must be a higher class, lest there be nothing to be lower than.

Public school, for instance, teaches all kids equally, so that no one kid can get ahead of the rest without reprimand. One size fits all — though completely and provably a failure of logic — is the delusional paradigm of this modern, humanist pedagogy. Humanism is the false religion of the atheist, the anarchist, the spiritually dead. The big bang is the religion of science. The singularity is the religion of the futurist, who’s spirit is devoid of and opposed to his own Source. Each wants to play god in a different way, and the education system is there to further the cause of this man-as-god mind-set. And through this institutionalization of legal (artificial) equality not of men but of legal, fictional (bloodless) persons in law, the foundation is laid to cause total inequity through such institutions as civil rights, that is, special rights for special groups that suddenly aren’t in any way equal anymore to the rest of the common, legalistic family. And so the values we associate with family (race) now come from the corporation nation, not the traditional values of our True family (race). In the end, the man that through legal personhood accepts artificial, legal equality with another man’s projected legal persona can never again claim God-given, Natural rights. For the source of the legal person is not God, not Nature, and no man may commune with God when acting in a lie, when acting in legal (anti-God) persona (mask). There is only one actual definition of the legal term equality, which is that all persons of the state stand with a required and equal punishment under the law. One that acts in equality instead of in True equity deserves not equity from others, for equity requires moral choice, and acting upon moral choice in the legal (immoral) realm is illegal.

And yet, in what seems a paradox, everywhere you look in Hollywood and its governmentally sponsored and controlled viral outlets of news and entertainment media one can find only the most blatant of race-baiting, and more specifically the demonization of any modicum of “white” racial, that is, cultural ethnicity and identity. Even so-called “white” people are learning to hate themselves for being “white,” though I’ve never actually met a “white person” in my life, since legal persons are only fictions of law. If Hollywood is to be believed in its re-writing and revisionist defeat of actual history through entertainment, it was the “black” people that freed the slaves, and “white” slavery didn’t even exist, let alone the modern black-on-black slave trade in Africa and the sex-trafficking of every skin-color happening right now.

Again, racism isn’t in dictionaries before the 1900’s. Why? Because before this artificial construct of racism there was only race. You see, race means family. Bloodlines, not skin color. That which was traditionally racially-motivated was in fact family-motivated. Corporations and/or governments (States) were historically created to protect the prosperity of bloodlines of families, their family (racial) inheritance, which by their very design in Nature are, as a generalization, often similar in skin-color. Race is indeed a generic term until it is purposefully, intentionally applied to some thing.

Webster defined it as it was in 1828:

RACE – noun – [Latin radix and radius having the same original. This word coincides in origin with rod, ray, radiate, etc.] 1. The lineage of a family, or continued series of descendants from a parent who is called the stock. A race is the series of descendants indefinitely. Thus all mankind are called the race of Adam; the Israelites are of the race of Abraham and Jacob. Thus we speak of a race of kings, the race of Clovis or Charlemagne; a race of nobles, etc. Hence the long race of Alban fathers come. 2. A generation; a family of descendants. A race of youthful and unhandled colts. 3. A particular breed; as a race of mules; a race of horses; a race of sheep. Of such a race no matter who is king. 4. A root; as race-ginger, ginger in the root or not pulverized. 5. A particular strength or taste of wine; a kind of tartness… (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary Of The English Language)

RACISM/RACIST – ??? – Sorry, those terms haven’t been created by the communists yet.

—=—

Should we stop referring to the color of a “Yellow Lab” because the “Black Lab” might be offended by the Truth of the color of its fur?

Should we stop distinguishing bell peppers by their color because they all taste the same?

Racism is not specifically defined in this 1828 dictionary because in the minds of men of old there was no such thing. There was only family, cousins, genealogy, heraldry, and the fact that whole countries and cultures were set up (incorporated) and based therefore on these blood-based “family values” across the world. And they still are. America was certainly no exception to this rule, though perhaps the first family to be intentionally overcome (planned) by its own immigration policies in order to create the notion of a new global world (secular humanist) order. It is certainly not a “racist” action to attempt to protect ones own moral fabric of society created from the like-mindedness of a family (race) of men from the influence and degradation caused by the acceptance and toleration of different races (family bloodlines) that have differing or even completely opposing family values, religious notions, and moral codes. Yet to call men of moral character based on such racial (family) tradition as “racist,” that is, those that wish to preserve the very ideals of the foundation and reason behind the original forming of a political body (State), can only be labeled as exactly what it is — intolerance. Today’s modern construct of so-called “racism” is a weapon of purely political motivation, used vehemently and ironically without prejudice to foment the intolerance of Real family so as to make the “State” the father, the head of the corporation (artificial, surrogate, legal family), and especially the destruction of such traditional family (race-based) values. To destroy a society, a culture, and ultimately the law and ability of a blood-related private people to enjoy the benefits of family and Natural liberty based on moral, self-Evident Law, one only need to project the active ignorance of Eugenic race bias into the common, dumbed-down population base so that they turn against one another, so that every neighbor is thine enemy, a competitor, and a threat to some empty idol of the god of skin-color and mammon. Ultimately, the goal of the men behind these eugenic ideals is to impose a universal, legally induced (figurative/artificial) persona of corruption of blood in all men regardless of skin-color, or what the constitution calls as “attainder,” and therefore to establish a global citizenship that requires the taking away of liberty and the power to self-govern through surrender to one of many corporation nations (the voluntary taking of the mixed, legal surname over the Christian name to render a legal persona). He that cannot show his bloodline, that his blood is of God (of Nature), of a Real Family (Race) of God, and not the legal state (artificially birth-certified and registered to the district/Caesar), is therefore a slave of the State (fictional creator of legal persons). For persons have no blood, and their creator god is only man’s government. Only through legal persona (mask/status) can we all be made into the humanistic race of adam, banned from the Garden and doomed to suffer the wrath of disobeying the Law of Nature (God). The word adam in the Bible translates to mankind, by the way, or in other words all men not spiritually free of the world (artificial construct) of man’s design. Adam (mankind) is man fallen, those entrapped in the anti-God legal matrix. The story of Adam as a singular man is a personification of all men, personification being the only way to tell such a story of moral teaching. We are all acting as adam did, biting into the apple (fig) of artificial knowledge (information), the concepts, lies, and inventions of man that go against the Law and Design of Nature (God). The metaphor is beautiful and instructive when read correctly and applied to oneself.

But the race-baiting politicians and other deceitful entertainers (professional, paid liars) seek to divide so as to conquer, to oppose all moral Law, and to cause you to do the same. To do this, all that might disagree must be labeled as racist, just like Lenin intended the fallacious title to be used. And finally, when each “side” of the now equalized debt-slaves are too afraid to speak, and when our hatred of each side is the guiding principal behind policy and entertainment, then the laws of forced equality can be made firm, and we all become like a deranged triangle, where each side blames the other for the shape we are in though never actually seeing any side but ones own.

Yet all the sides of a triangle are equal, aren’t they?

The point is not to bring us together, but to force us together when such a disposition is impossible in Nature. This constant recreation of forced turmoil by folding the different cultural and often opposing laws and religious moral foundations is the total opposite of what the Bible instructs. We are supposed to leave Babylon, not force it into legal existence, and certainly not to tolerate such destruction of our moral, foundational heritage and counterbalancing, spiritual Law. We are supposed to preserve and enforce the Moral Law, not allow it to be mixed and tainted by other cultural, legal, and religious influences. But hey, such moral reactions would be labeled fallaciously as “racist” in these strange days.

—=—

“You know, to just be grossly generalistic, you could put half of Trump’s supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. Right? [Laughter/applause]. The racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic — you name it. And unfortunately there are people like that…”

–Hillary Clinton

—=—

Intolerance is tolerance…

Should the average “American” be tolerable to these flattering titles of opposing lifestyles, as that which absolutely defeats and opposes the moral (unwritten) standard of conduct? If so, then what use is it to have a country and law in the first place? What is a country created for but to ensure a like-minded people sharing a system of law and culture exclusive of all other lifestyles and systems be protected in that moral belief system? Should the foundation of Bible Law as common law be forgotten or ignored to make room for a completely different and opposing system of law and religion, just so the appearance of intolerance can be pretended not to exist in the minds of “American” men? And come to think of it, what country, state, or nation in the history of the world has ever not been xenophobic or consequently been destroyed by its sudden tolerance of outside political and religious influence? Wikipedia explains that xenophobia is:

“…the fear and distrust of that which is perceived to be foreign or strange.[1][2] Xenophobia can involve perceptions of an ingroup towards an outgroup and can manifest itself in suspicion of the activities of others, and a desire to eliminate their presence to secure a presumed purity and may relate to a fear of losing national, ethnic, religious, linguistic, cultural, social class or racial identity.[3]…”

—=—

Isn’t that the purpose of starting an organized structure of society? Isn’t that the purpose of creating a corporation, its bylaws, and its leaders? In other words, isn’t every country, every tribe, every “people,” and for that matter every family (race) by default steeped in xenophobia? Can a race exist without racism? In other words, can race exist without being prideful and proud of what that race (family) is specifically because it is different than all others? Can one man call another man a racist without acknowledging the fact that his idea of racism stems from being a different race than he that he calls as racist? Can we really deny the existence of race so as to not appear to be racist, when the Truth of the matter is that we cannot help or quit being of a race (family) in the first place? Do you believe that the denial of the existence of race somehow alters the fact that we are all of different races (families/bloodlines)? Do you not see the trickery here? Do you not see the social engineering being foisted upon you so that you have no power to defend yourself as part of a race (family), and therefore have no power to act morally or from the Moral Law of Nature, because you can no longer identify with your own family (race) values? Do you not see that this is all designed to steal your soul away from Nature, away from your Source?

For better or worse, all of these constructs, from countries to religions, are artificial families (corporations) that have instilled their own artificial (legally derived) family values as law from the actual family (race) that started them. Only tolerance of the intolerable, those that act purposefully against the founding family (race) values, can destroy the country. And the greatest tool to manage such a hostile takeover is the good old manipulation of Christian tolerance. Not balanced, educated tolerance with all other virtues, but the artificial kind that is enforced by legal law — the kind that has allowed countless opposing religions and legal systems to be legally protected by government as they attempt to destroy and change the entire structure of law, religion, and family (race) values that made America what it is. Good or bad, right or wrong, whatever all countries around the world have become, their strengths and weaknesses, are solely to be blamed on the race (family) that created and continues to sustain them. If the race (family) is driven out of its own creation, the country no longer exists except in empty name only.

Now riddle me this… What country in history was not built on a distrust and fear of other cultures? What country is ever not foreign to another? There simply is no such thing as a non-foriegn country. And it is a much quoted subject that the man or country of men without fear of interference is certain to fail, and will ultimately be assimilated into another in just a few short generations. In other words, a People (family) that tolerates another way of life and law must necessarily lose their own, for two opposing forces must, by their nature, repel each other. If this isn’t clear, try pushing two magnets together the wrong way. They must be forced together, and the repulsion will never actually cease, and so neither can the executive military force behind it. We must be bound by the invisible chains of legalistic law in order to merge all cultures, all systems of law and religion into one global society, one soulless, bloodless family of the fallen adamites. This is like blowing up a balloon past its elastic capacity, knowing it will explode from the pressure of being forced to accept more than it can tolerate. I guess the balloon is therefore racist against certain air? Those enforcing this artificial tolerance know exactly what the result will be, and the United Nations was set up to govern the madness and spiritually dead order out of chaos they are instilling.

I want you to really consider this statement by the former first lady (of the Royal American bloodline) for a moment. More to the point, consider its holier-than-thou source. Hillary Clinton is part of the royal family, that is, the bloodlines of European nobility and kings, just as her husband (cousin) is, and just as every president and vice-president that has ever been placed by congress into the United States corporation is. In other words, Clinton’s power is a direct result of her race, her “white-blooded” (pure) family line, which by her own choice of words makes her the most “racist” figure in that room! What are the queens and kings of Europe if not one big, unhappy family (race)? And what are all of us to them if not tolerated, deplorable goyim?

The following are all a single race (family bloodline). They are not different races, only different corporations held under the same family estate. And, like the United States, they are all organized by a constitution. Constitutions are a dime a dozen, sorry… And they’re all hereditary in their lines of succession, or in other words, it’s all in the family (race). There are no heirs if there is no race (family). You really have to be a fool to believe that the United States president is not also in actuality another family minion upon this list. Trump is as “white” as they come, because in their world, the word white means a pure-blooded royal descendent of the kings of the following kingdoms:

State
Type
Succession
Dynasty
Title
First-in-line
 Kingdom
of Belgium
Constitution
Hereditary
Saxe-
Coburg and Gotha
King
Prince Philippe of Belgium, Duke of Brabant cropped.jpg
Heir apparent: Princess Elisabeth, Duchess of Brabant (eldest child)
Denmark Kingdom
of Denmark
Constitution
Hereditary
Glücksburg
Queen
Dronning Margrethe II (crop).jpg
Heir apparent: Crown Prince Frederik(eldest child)
 Principality
of Liechtenstein
Constitution
Hereditary
Liechten-stein
Sov. Prince
Fürst Hans-Adam II. von und zu Liechtenstein.jpg
Heir apparent: Hereditary Prince Alois (eldest son)
 Grand Duchy
of Luxembourg
Constitution
Hereditary
Bourbon
Grand Duke
Henri of Luxembourg in Brazil 28Nov07.JPG
Heir apparent: Hereditary Grand Duke Guillaume (eldest child)
 Principality
of Monaco
Constitution
Hereditary
Grimaldi
Sov. Prince
Albert II Monaco (2008).jpg
Heir apparent: Hereditary Prince Jacques (only legitimate son)
 Kingdom of
the Netherlands
Constitution
Hereditary
Orange-Nassau/
Amsberg
King
Koning-willem-alexander-okt-15-s.jpg
Heir apparent: Princess Catharina-Amalia, Princess of Orange (eldest child)
 Kingdom of Norway
Constitution
Hereditary
Glücksburg
King
President Medvedev with King Harald V of Norway big225593 (crop).jpg
Heir apparent: Crown Prince Haakon (only son)
 Kingdom of Spain
Constitution
Hereditary
Bourbon
King
Felipe de Borbón en Ecuador.jpg
Heir presumptive: Princess Leonor, Princess of Asturias (elder daughter) [II]
 Kingdom of Sweden
Constitution
Hereditary
Bernadotte
King
Carl XVI Gustaf.jpg
Heir apparent: Crown Princess Victoria (eldest child)
 United Kingdom of
Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Constitution
Hereditary
Windsor
Queen
Elizabeth II greets NASA GSFC employees, May 8, 2007 edit.jpg
Heir apparent: Prince Charles, Prince of Wales (eldest son)

—=—

Yes, those subjects of royalty also have a constitution, you know, that thing you as a national citizenship as a status (property) created by congress has been tricked into worshiping even though it has nothing to do with you under that common, lower-class status of denizened personhood? But they are at least smart enough on some level not to worship that constitution as anything but what it is, a form of idolatrous worship of false gods mediated by magical, legal terms of art to give the appearance of some pretended state of independence, while keeping intact the “royal prerogative” and war powers of the king and queen (head of church and state) of the Crown Corporation and its realms of debt-slaves. Even some Canadians actually think they (as subjects) are not under the power of the queen, that the corporation of “Canada” is not part of that royal corporation sole ruled under the Crown. They at least know, if even in doubt of their own disposition, that they are subjects of a sovereign corporation headed by a false god (king/queen/prince). In America, though as a nation it clearly and openly calls itself sovereign under the law of nations and refers to we the common citizenships as its subjects and customers, we somehow have instilled in ourselves a false-sense of artificial detachment, of freedom from tyranny. We are like a single goldfish in a bowl that believes itself to be somehow sovereign from the man that feeds us and changes our piss and shit-filled water, without whom we would suffocate in our own excrement. We lie to ourselves and teach those unreasonable lies to our children without question, and as children we believe our own lies even after we grow out of most other childhood fantasies. We figure out that Santa Clause and the Easter Bunny aren’t real, but continue to fool ourselves that we are a naturally free people even as we use and claim the protection of the legal property (status in personhood) of the United States government and pay its tax (tribute to Caesar). God created men. Governments create persons. Big difference!

Perhaps you have forgotten or been brainwashed out of knowing what some of these words actually mean?

HEIR-APPARENT – noun – The man who, during the life of his ancestor, is entitled to succeed to his estate or crown. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary Of The English Language)

HEREDITARY – adjective –  1. That has descended from an ancestor. He is in possession of a large hereditary estate. 2. That may descend from an ancestor to an heir; descendible to an heir at law. The crown of Great Britain is hereditary. 3. That is or may be transmitted from a parent to a child; as hereditary pride; hereditary bravery; hereditary disease. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary Of The English Language)

PRINCE – noun – prins. [Latin princeps.] 1. In a general sense, a sovereign; the chief and independent ruler of a nation or state. Thus when we speak of the princes of Europe, we include emperors and kings. Hence, a chief in general; as a prince of the celestial host. 2. A sovereign in a certain territory; one who has the government of a particular state or territory, but holds of a superior to whom he owes certain services; as the princes of the German states. 3. The son of a king or emperor, or the issue of a royal family; as princes of the blood. In England, the eldest son of the king is created prince of Wales… (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary Of The English Language)

—=—

If the prince (or president) is a sovereign, and you are its subject, then you are not sovereign.

Worst of all, you have either forgotten or choose to remain actively ignorant of the fact that the sovereign royalty of America is of the same bloodlines (family) as the royalty of these European rulers. You choose to casually ignore the most race-oriented regime of corporations (nations) in the world, in all of history, the royal houses that lay claim to most of the (secular) world. You pretend that elections are fair, and that just anyone, from any race/family (bloodline) can become president. And nowadays, with such horrific race-baiting being pushed in all forms of entertainment and media, you are being entrained to believe in the fallacy that only “white” skinned people are in power. In other words, in stead of realizing the truth about the completely race-orientated royal bloodlines (families) that rule every nation, we are all being tricked into blaming all problems created by those exclusive (actual racist) bloodlines (presidents, vice-presidents, congress, corporate CEO’s, etc.) on the color of skin, completely missing the actual problem that is the respect of such royal (uncorrupted) bloodlines. All blood in reality is red when it’s visible to the Truth of the open air without legal (anti-God) consideration, not white or black. We are ruled by one race (foreign family) of men (heirs) according to heraldic, genealogical heritage, and we don’t even know it’s happening. Instead, this family of absolutely corrupt “royals” confuses and obfuscates from this reality by convincing the black people that its all the white people’s fault, the brown people that its all the yellow people’s fault, and the white people that its every other color’s fault. But the Truth is that none of this has anything to do with skin-color and everything to do with the actual meaning of the word “race.” Race is not determined by skin color, but by bloodline (family). “We, the People” is not us, white or black. It is a select bloodline, a family of men enjoined and working together to suppress, control, and extort in every way imaginable the rest of the common population of Earth. And that includes all skin-colors, with no regard to race (family). In fact, the whole idea and purpose of national citizenship is to pretend destruction, that is, legal corruption (attainder) of the blood and therefore bloodline and blood-rights of all other men not in the so-called royal family. No blood, no God-given rights, for they are inherent only to free men, not subjects in false persona (national citizenships).

Perhaps you’ve never considered that there is no such thing as a “people” in Nature? There was no people of England until it was invented. There were no Americans until America was legally created. All so-called people (a legal title) are inventions of men. And so any incorporation of “people” that supposedly exists is necessarily a fraud, illegitimate, and certainly not a Creation of Nature (God). Perhaps you never thought to ask the question as a United States citizenship just who “We, the People” actually is? Perhaps you’ve never realized that a subject of the United States is therefore a subject of whomever “We, the People” happen to be? Trust me, you would know if you were one of them, that is, one of their race (bloodline), for you would be declaring such racism in order to be part of that elite (upper-class) band of race-driven rulers of the rest of us.

To be clear, this is the epitome of True racism, and is, in fact, the only Real racism that exists in the world. It’s called royalty. Nobility. Heraldry. Genealogy. Elitism. The upper-class. And only they are considered as “white” because the meaning of this word white in legalese refers to the purity of blood as it relates only to the royal, inheritable (family) bloodline and therefore the line of blood-right succession, not skin color. Again, I tell you that Barack Obama is “white” according to legal law, being a direct descendent of the Royal family (race), as are most “black” skinned actors and politicians that are of that bloodline. You think Hally Barry isn’t considered “white” ??? LOL! Every one of them is in line for the throne, down to the last and most distant legitimately blood-linked cousin. In other words, to be a member (cousin) of the “legitimate” royal family (bloodline) is to stand as an inheritor of the corporations created by them, which they call as their kingdoms. As a common citizen of any nation, no man is actually considered as a “white” man, for the very conception of citizenship to a nation requires the forfeiture and attainder of such consideration by blood-right (God-given rights) in exchange for legal (artificial) rights. The goal is to turn all men of all races not royal unto the identity of legal persons (fictions without blood).

This modern conceptualization of racism is designed to do one and only one thing — to destroy the family unit, and therefore to destroy what is known as family values. But this sinister effort is only designed for the common citizenships of nations. The royal families exist behind the scenes, hidden beyond the corporate administrative state set up to control the plebes. Even today the queen of England pretends to be honorary, ceremonial, and not in charge of the “constitutional monarchy” that is the United Kingdom and Union. The further out of sight the hidden royal hand can exist, the more powerful it becomes.

We have no idea what it means anymore when we see signs that point to “private land” or a “private road” ahead, only that we are not supposed to go there. We only know that we would be trespassing if we did. Yet we have no idea that such a sign represents a different jurisdiction, a different realm of landholding bloodline families. We only know that we are not part of that family. And we treat that invisible border across that private land the same way we treat the US border, respecting that what lies beyond is unwelcoming, foreign territory we need permission to tread upon.

The very definition of an individual estate, country, nation, or state is that it’s foreign to all others. All 50 States are foreign to the United States (the district of Washington/New Columbia). Again, in this word foreign we garner that the law is private and strict, and therefore totally intolerant of any other culture or law — intolerant, in other words, of any other People (State) except by contract (constitution/compact/treaty, etc.). This is, for all intents and purposes, the way of the world in every country, culture, and creed (belief system). They that create a State (incorporated, private/foreign People) are always, without exception, a bloodline (family) of men. The formation of a nation is by definition the formation of an ethnicity, the creation of a new artificial “race” (legal family/corporation) of men separate and foreign to what we call as the human race. Man is not human. What is human is that which belongs to men, such as the human anatomy. Humans are not creations of God, of Nature, for the word human is manmade, a scientific classification no different that equine, feline, or canine. To be human is to be the property of man, not a man. To be referred to as a human is to be considered only as an animal, or in other words and by their own definition, as that which has no soul, a thing without self-anima, a thing without (outside of) God’s Realm and Law. The human soul does not belong to a human, it belongs to a man. What is of man is a human quality, but no man is human. To be a “human being” is to act in humanism. To be a man is to be a Creation of God. Human is only ever a property (quality/trait) of man, never the actual man. A People is never a man, for to be part of a people is to be something artificial, something that is invented by and therefore belongs to man, not God. No man is a people, for the word people is a plural. To be part of a people is to no longer be a man of God. This distinction is the foundation of the difference between moral and civil law. Civil law is for people, while moral law is only for men. The moral law must always be held higher, by all men, than that of the legal, civil law of any people he may be voluntarily a part of. It is this distinction, this protective cloak of spiritual, moral Law that has been lost to God’s people. When the foundation of anything fails, the super-structure built upon it must also, self-evidently fall. This is a maxim of law.

The funny thing is that when a person (subject) of the United States is sued, we get a letter from “the People of” whatever State that court is in. We, whom aren’t the people, know without question that we aren’t the people simply because we are sued by the people. The people don’t sue the people, because the people is a single, legal corporation. There is only one people, and it obviously ain’t us. This gets confusing because the general term “people” is used to describe us, as the common people. But the People in the constitution is only referring to the incorporation of that specific “white” the race (bloodline family) as a specific, exclusive “People” (capitalized), not the common goyim.

This private, non-ethnic status of royal privilege, by definition, requires a certain “purity” of blood, in heraldic and genealogical terms of construction. No State (People) exists without this racial (family) background in the world. This is why traditionally we would expect to see Japanese looking people in Japan, Chinese looking people in China, and Scandinavian looking people in the Scandinavian countries. This is not vulgar racism as is promoted to common goyim. This is the True meaning of race. Without race (family), one has no State (private People). And without a private People (State), one has no reason to track and keep record of pure (white) blood. And this is the very opposite of national (mixed) ethnicity (national identity). For the royal families of Africa and Thailand, I assure you, have white (pure) blood despite their dark complexion according to their heraldic records. Pure blood, of course, doesn’t actually exist. It merely refers to the active recording of genealogical records in heraldry, no different than any corporation is structured to reflect a president, vice president, and all the line of succession by blood relation. To be clear, I know no man that does not seek to pass on his inheritance to his bloodline child (issue). In other words, you are equally as guilty of invoking this false, proprietary lineage as any royal. Only the scope and size of the commercial transaction of inheritance is different. In this way, we must acknowledge the fact that we are all in fact racist, which ultimately means nothing at all in Nature (Reality), only that we wish the best for our own children (family bloodline).

But you must understand the difference between your status as a national citizenship (commercial vessel) and those private, royal rulers of that persona (property). You have been tricked and continuously brainwashed into believing that your family is the nation (corporation) you were born into. And you identify your race by that nation. There is no such think as Japan or China or Mexico in Nature. These are corporations created by private families (races). Ethnicity is simply not what you believe it to be. Ethnicity can only be understood from the perspective of master and slave. If you ask a slave what slave-master’s estate he belongs to, he would tell you the family name of his master. So too does a citizenship of any nation identify his origin by the nation he was birthed (registered/taxed) into. And so, to us, it seems perfectly reasonable to identify ourselves as “Americans” or as “Englishmen” or as “African.” This is no different than saying I am an employee (agent) of “Walmart” or “Target” corporation. A nation is an artificial construct, a fake family (race), made solely of persons (fictional characters). The fact that you have been entrained to identify yourself by your ethnicity (nationally spoken language) is a cosmic joke, for the whole reason behind such identity (pretended sameness as fiction) is to taint your bloodline (family), to take you out of Nature and place you in attainder (corruption of blood) so that you can and must be governed by the governments (mind control) of nations. Yet, as I’ve written about extensively, these royal families (races) are not of the nations. They created the nations as holding companies for we, their debt-enslaved goyim. They are private (foreign) and sovereign from all nations. Most importantly, to identify yourself by ethnicity is to remove yourself from God (Nature). It is to cause you to deny God as your Source of Existence and Law, and thus cause you to worship false idols and gods (magistrates). I am not American, I am of the Universe (Jehovah). But to the royal families (race), we are all just one color, the color of corruption, which is the color of heathens. We are all the color black to them…

ETHNOLOGY – noun – [Gr. nation, and discourse.] A treatise on nations. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary Of The English Language)

ETHNICAL – adjective – [Latin ethnicus; Gr. from nation from the root of G. heide, heath, woods, whence heathen. See Heathen.] Heathen; pagan; pertaining to the gentiles or nations not converted to christianity; opposed to Jewish and Christian. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary Of The English Language)

ETHNIC – noun – A heathen; a pagan. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary Of The English Language)

ETHNICISM – noun – Heathenism; paganism; idolatry. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary Of The English Language)

HEATHEN – noun – [Gr. from heath, that is, one who lives in the country or woods, as pagan from pagus, a village.] 1. A pagan; a Gentile; one who worships idols, or is unacquainted with the true God. In the Scriptures, the word seems to comprehend all nations except the Jews or Israelites, as they were all strangers to the true religion, and all addicted to idolatry. The word may now be applied perhaps to all nations, except to Christians and Mohammedans. Heathen, without the plural termination, is used plurally or collectively, for Gentiles or heathen nations. Ask of me, and I will give thee the heathen for thine inheritance. Psalms 2:8. Heathen, however, has a plural, expressing two or more individuals. If men have reason to be heathens in Japan– The precepts and examples of the ancient heathens. 2. A rude, illiterate, barbarous person. – adjective – Gentile, pagan; as a heathen author. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary Of The English Language)

—=—

The reference to Christians above is not a reference to the false denominations of corporate, legalist religions set up by the state to deceive and distract you from the True meaning of God and the Bible, but is a title placed on those that cannot and will not become part of the nations of men because they choose to follow only the Law of God, not men. These are the True followers of Christ, who understand that Christ is the Law (Word) of God, not a mere idol to worship as a false god. To be called a “Christian” while at the same time be called a citizen of any nation is to be exactly the fool they want us all to be, having two flattering titles that are diametrically opposed to one another, representing two completely opposing systems of law. This is how to create chaos, and then construct a legal, secular system of order from it.

So that this concept of bloodline as race is clear, please consider that the current, hereditarily acquired “black-skinned” kings of the kingdoms of Morocco, Eswatini, and Lesotho in Africa are by their very assent to the thrown racist. They are in power because of their bloodline (race), which must be understood to be legally considered as “white” in legal (artificial) color, meaning pure-bred from their own royal race (People/family) that reigned before them. And waiting in the wings are eager, blood-related men seeking to take that throne away from their brother, sister, father, or cousin. Race is power. Racial discrimination is the center of that power, and is the very difference between common, national citizenships and the People (State) that rules over them. Without race, there would be no countries, no kingdoms.

Just what do you think Game Of Thrones is about, anyway?

(Hint: In that show, those are cousins having sex with and entering into arranged marriages with direct, pure bloodline cousins to carry on the “royal” pretended-to-be-legitimate line of succession, and killing each other in order to claim hereditary blood-right as heir-apparent to those various, interrelated thrones, as head of those corporations. It’s a fictional show about the actual fiction of pretended royal families that still rule over us corrupted, tainted-blood commoners today. It’s all part of training you to remain under the illusionary power and control of their self-proclaimed superior race, by fictionalizing and pretending such things don’t actually exist anymore, not since dragons roamed the earth. And unicorns. Corporations are ruthless… because it’s always been all in the family. Royalty is just a sophisticated mafia family, organized crime under the guise of the magic and trickery that is rebranded as the prestige of royal blood.)

Now, where does this leave the race-baiting meme of so-called “white” privilege?

Imagine if I went to Japan and entered a Japanese family’s house (a term that means family or race) and exclaimed that they have “red privilege.” Or how about I go to Iran and claim that those families of the same race have “brown privilege.” How about the “yellow privilege” of the main families in China? Yet we have been entrained to accept that the people of Denmark and America have “white privilege” despite every other imagined colored race in the world. Meanwhile, we are all being extorted and seriously screwed over in so many ways by the only actual race of “People” that are still able to claim their bloodline (family/race) as the private founding families of the States (People) united. They’ve made us equal in our enslavement with the right hand while using the left hand to focus our attention on each other instead of the Source of our collective despotism, which we have been fooled into thinking is the price of freedom. And now, by turning this non-existent concept of racism into a so-called legal “hate-crime,” we now have the veritable legal tool to cause each other harm by turning this fallacy of race (family) into a dirty word, and by punishing anyone that acknowledges it. Again, this is the only way we can be governed legally, if we do harm and injure (bring into false, legal law) each other for non-crimes that are legally (artificially) imposed on nonsensical terms like “racist” hate crimes.

How do you destroy a People, a family, that bases its society on “family values?”

You do exactly what these royal bloodlines have done to us — destroy the ability of men to claim to be part of a family. If you take away race (family) from a man, you necessarily take away his ability to practice in action any form of family (race) values. And in their place, we must be convinced to voluntarily accept and thus tolerate all that is opposed to and that is actively-at-war-with our family (race), leaving us defenseless (without the ability to bear heraldic Arms of our families) against the legal matrix simulation. War and peace have no distinction, for either way the commerce of the gods of mammon shall be done. Amen. War is a very profitable commercial transaction, with instant rewards. Peace just takes a little longer to reach such profit levels.

Since the True meanings of these words have been lost on most of us as we are entertained and entranced with lies and propaganda about how we are all racist and shameful even though we are all considered legally (artificially) equal under the law as tainted, blood-corrupted debt-slaves, regardless of skin-color, we fail to recognize the difference between a nation (commercial corporation) and a State (private, incorporated People). Many of us call ourselves as “Christians” but are “unacquainted with the True God” because corporate religion is merely empty idol worship – the worship of the form of symbols, statues, heroes, saviors, fictional personas, flattering titles, and saints without substance, without actually obeying the Law of God, that is, without ever being or becoming Christ-like as instructed. This is (we are) what they of the private, royal bloodlines (race) call as heathenism, paganism, the lower class of goyim. Those that are citizenships in any nation (corporation) can only be gentiles, for they (we) follow the legal law above and most often against that of the Law of Nature (God’s Law/Word). This is not religion, this is law. This is the way the legal system works, causing voluntary attainder (legal, fictional corruption of blood), which causes class division, as those who claim blood-right (the right to Bear family Arms) and those who have rescinded that right in order to accept replacement legal rights granted and enforced by the still lawfully recognized families (races). This is every nation. The actual pre-modern Jews, as mentioned here, had no nation, which is why they were a free people and, having no nation, were called “the international jew.” The nation of Israel, unlawful and illegitimate as it is, is not full of Jews, it is full of goyim that call themselves as “Jews” just as this supposedly Christian nation of America is full of goyim that call themselves as “Christians.” No follower of Christ (God’s Law) would take a false god or its false legal (e.g. civil) law (doctrine) above that of the Law of Nature (God). In fact, that is the very aspect that confirms one is a True follower of Christ, one that in his or her actions is Christ-like, and therefore in all ways intolerable to the legal systems and nation of men acting in legal persona (anti-God). Likewise, the Native American Indian tribes and other aboriginal free peoples were never conquered (purchased) until they agreed to become “nations” instead of free tribes. To be an Indian nation is to abandon the Indian culture and life to become just another ethnic class of lower-class goyim (heathen gentiles). The citizenships of Israel today, as well, are persons of the nation, not free men of and under God. They have fallen for the oldest trick in the book, thinking that being a member of the so-called “Jewish” nation of Israel (a legal corporation) is synonymous with being and acting like Israelite from the Bible. It is the same with the “Cristians” that believe that being a follower of Christ (God’s Law) is the same as being a member of a “Christian” nation or false, legally derived religion (corporation). A nation is the perfect example of Orwell’s meme that freedom is slavery, as all men enjoined in citizenship to any nation are its debt-slaves, free to choose their mode of employment (being used) as a commodity in a neo-feudalistic human capital management system (capitalism). The point is that every nation is run by some bloodline of men, some hereditarily conjoined club of “royal” (upper-class) rulers that remain private (foreign) from that nation in their own State (private People). In other words, we are all ruled by tolerated racism.

You can say it till you’re red in the face, but the statistics always paint a different picture…

Racism is a lie told to those not of the royal, master race,
in order to hide their own institutionalized, millennium-old heredity-based racism, by focusing all goyim on a war between cultural differences, which are falsely attributed to skin-color so as to keep us busy fighting each other instead of they that enslave us.

The truth is that every one of us are equal, that is, equally under their spell…

They look like us, but once you see these royal “families” for what they are, you realize that the lie of cultural, ethnic racism is only skin deep. Black or white, or anywhere in between, we are all trapped in the lower, vulgar class they created for us, for all of our blood has been turned black, our True Nature tainted, our souls corrupted. It is amusing to think of a white slave and a black slave arguing over who is more enslaved, using only skin-color to determine what is otherwise self-evident. For Orwell seems to have shortened one of his equative, dystopian maxims…

Equality is Slavery. Slavery is Freedom. Freedom is equality. Repeat.

If equality is slavery and slavery is freedom, then freedom is slavery.
It’s simple math.

And what is equality but forced tolerance?

And what is forced tolerance but institutionalized intolerance of any individual cultural strength and unity, a culture of cultural hate?

Still don’t get it?

This cultural neutering, the making impotent of cultural custom through equalization, is the same as allowing the common people to worship (think about) God however they see fit, but never to actually act on the moral law that scriptures teach. In other words, it is literally illegal to practice moral law.

You cannot be Christian (a follower of Christ/God’s Law) and also be under an opposing, legal system of law (false doctrine/law). A Christian, by definition, cannot tolerate anything legal (man-made law), for legal law is always, 100% opposed to (the undoing of) the Law of Nature (God). One can’t live according to truth (God) at all times and also adhere to the lies of legalism. Likewise, no culture can possibly be tolerable of the influence and immigration of another, especially when the customs and laws are different and opposed to each other.

Legal equality means we are all equally punishable under the legal law, and have no right to use, act under, or invoke the moral law (God). Freedom of religion is intolerable to a man of God, for the Law of Nature never changes. The Law of Nature (God) is not religion. Religion is part of man’s creation, not God’s.

And once you see them for what they are, you suddenly lose all tolerance and respect for them. Only the law they created to control us, to cause us to harm one another instead of loving each other — only the delusion of their artifice of esteem and legal, class-based status protects them from us… only the illusion they cast:

–=–

You want proof of our equality, that poverty and despotism is colorblind, then go to your local homeless shelter. Go to your local tent city. Go to your local food locker. See the equality oozing from the disenfranchised and start doing something to change it. Or are you too good for that lower class… kinda like they are too good for your class? Go tell those “white” people that they have “white” privilege and see what happens!

These bodies politic (incorporated “People”) were created not as legal entities but as a stock of people related by blood. Their created nations are designed to hold not their own stock, but the common live-stock of we gentiles (goyim), that is, we that are born into the heathen, idolatrous nations. Have we forgotten that the very concept of the various immigration policies of every country in the world are based on race (family) connection to that people (State)? Are we just going to ignore that the whole purpose of the war and creation of modern Israel was for the sole purpose of created a homeland for “Jews” and that this means that Palestinians (Arabs) therefore were displaced because of their “race” and ethnicity, as a bloodline not considered “Jewish” and therefore supposedly impure (not white, not pure-blooded, not uncorrupted)? Are we supposed to reconsider what it is to be “Mexican” or “English” or “Indian” because that is now a racist title, let alone not be allowed to consider that many diseases are exclusive to certain races (bloodlines)? Should all True cultures be vanquished to make room for… Ah, globalism. Now it’s starting to make sense. Global dystopia, Orwellian style. United Nations are really just united goy – one big melting pot of Godless heathens without any foundation of family values living without any natural moral compass.

What happens when, instead of being a natural (uncontrollable) occurrence and inevitably natural (God-given) order of species, the word race is used instead as a shallow excuse for illicit, bad behavior? What happens when moral men cannot defend what they have built, both physically and spiritually, to protect themselves from immoral men of either the same or a different race if they (we) are forced to tolerate everything that is intolerable and opposed to the continued survival and success of the fruit of their combined labors? What happens when one can no longer be effective in ones communication when even his words are considered as racist, sexist, or intolerable merely because they have a masculine, authoritative tone behind them? The answer to these questions is apparent in most nations today, not the least of which are the North American ones.

For the first time in history, the concept of race (bloodline and recorded familial genealogy) is being treated as an evil, as if racial differences both cultural and genetic simply don’t exist… except, that is, for the “royal” families This cultural neutering must be accompanied by national and now global tolerance, not only of cultural differences but specifically of absolutely opposing laws, until no moral (unwritten) law or notion of public decency is left. In other words, the only people left over, those that are not tolerated by this newly conditioned society of universal tolerance, are those that espouse any form of moral outrage, moral law, or other values that infringe upon the legal “human” rights of the most immoral of men. Our right to possess and exhibit a moral character in society will not be tolerated. Morality is racism. Family values are akin to xenophobia. Spirituality is a thought crime. Equality is artificially induced by legal law at birth, not by knowledge or actions. Solidarity in tolerance requires intolerance of all dissent, of all freedom of thought, and of all respect for difference. Tolerance is active ignorance of what should by all rights not be tolerated. And we are experiencing these facts in everything from music, art, and media to the corruption of medical, scientific, and intellectualist Babel that is killing and maiming us in droves every day.

Here’s Michael Moore, whose own American immigrant genealogy includes a forefather that was a white slave brought to America from a European prison, speaking in absolute lunacy about whatever he is pretending to perceive “the white guy” and “white men” to be. We are being indoctrinated by these societal-actors to hate ourselves, to become intolerable towards our own people, our own rich history, and to revision ourselves as oppressors instead of being equally oppressed as all other men, and regardless of the color of our skin. This is the ultimate example of profiteering off of race-baiting, a well-orchestrated deceit used by those in power to keep it in the family (bloodline). And perhaps most disturbing is the audience response!

—=—

The promotion of “racism” is nothing if not the induction of men into a culture of self-hatred. As a deleterious label placed on moral men defending their family honor and values, Zionist and other race-driven influencers, propagandists, and race-baiters have proven this fallacious term “racist” in whatever form it is implemented to be an invaluable and destructive weapon that, in the war of public opinion, wins by default every time. Why? Because ignorance is strength, and the public is swimming in a very large and controlled vat of induced, tolerated, active ignorance. If the messenger can be destroyed by such labels as antisemite or racist, then communism in whatever form it dresses up as wins every time. But isn’t that exactly what was portrayed by those screaming crowds of common heathens in Nineteen Eighty-four in their idolatrous worship of their glorious leader (false god)? Do you think worshiping Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump is not idolatry? Of course it is! And its exactly what is expected from we, the goyim.

How does one separate anciently engrained cultures from the races of men that have continuously practiced them, when the very conception of that culture has everything to do with race (bloodline)? The answer is that you can’t, for all cultures and systems of law and religion are unique to race, save that Law which is taught by Jesus Christ. But this law is not one of tolerance or acceptance, but one of privacy, of remaining foreign from men and cultures and nations that are exactly what we have all become, common pagans in idol worship of false gods and followers of other doctrines (i.e. man’s legal systems of law). These cultures cannot be mixed. They are by their nature unique and necessarily exclusive from all others. That which opposes a foundational culture and system of law cannot be integrated together and somehow remain uncorrupted or uninfluenced by the other. The very nature of any culture is assimilation of all others. In other words, one is expected to adapt and follow whatever culture and legal law system he or she emigrates into. But this is only true of the goyim, those that are enslaved by the false freedom (legal franchise) of citizenship to a some nation (corporation), that is, idolatry to a false (legal) god (ruler by blood inheritance). And by definition any and every culture, system of law, and religion is defined by its uniqueness, its intolerance of all others. Without these differences, this foundational, integrated opposition of all cultures to all others, there would be no reason for them to exist, just as there is no purpose for the existence of legal (manmade/written) law except to specifically stand against the moral, spiritual, unwritten Law of Nature (God) as expressed in the Bible and other scriptures (books of spiritual, moral law).

In other words, the goal of universal tolerance is to destroy all culture, all religion, all law, and all spirituality steeped in morality, so as to cause the inception of a singular, completely amoral, intolerable global society called as globalism… a new world (secularist) order. But again, because we have been made actively ignorant of this ancient Latin word secular (translated as the artificial, commercial world of men, not of God, not of Nature), we have no idea how to fight the implementation of this New World Order so often projected in science fiction dystopias like Orwell’s and Huxley’s. Because the Latin word seclorum in the phrase printed on every dollar bill is translated as “world” instead of its actual meaning of “secular,” most folks do not understand that this new world (secular) order is nothing more or less than a total destruction of all spiritual concepts, belief systems, and moral actions (self-government) by men. Because we have lost knowledge of the fact that the Bible is the foundation of common law in America and in the European countries (holders of the ultimate, true “racism” attributed to the genealogically derived royal families and their blood-lines of succession), there is no referential left to us that we may fight this global secularism with that which it is opposed to. Secularism is diametrically opposed to the Bible, or in other words, legalism (written law) is absolutely opposed to the moral, unwritten, Bible Law. In a totally secular order, no spirituality or moral thought or right will be tolerated. This secular toleration of all things anti-moral is the end game of this modern, universal tolerance we are all both passively and actively accepting, acting in, and pretending to love — loving that which we should hate, as the Bible warns we shall time and again in our participation and respect of “worldly” deprivation, leading to our ultimate self-destruction. We are tolerating our own demise. We are at this point tolerating an Orwellian nightmare without even a whimper, for to speak out against tolerance will not be tolerated by the intolerable promoters of universal, secularist tolerance.

You know what I have finally come to understand? It’s a real ballbuster. The truth is that almost every public attack, every so-called hate crime, every theft and every assault, every shooting, public education, blood-sport, assault and murder… these are all racist. Why? Because one generally does not attack and steal from one’s own family.

Acceptance of what is a known evil is surrender from what is self-evidently good.

Tolerance is intolerance.

War is peace because we peacefully tolerate war.

Freedom is slavery because we freely tolerate slavery.

Ignorance is strength because we strongly tolerate ignorance.

Through ignorance, slavery, and war (which are falsely called as knowledge, freedom, and peace) we will be destroyed through our own tolerance of intolerable things, our love of what we should hate, our acceptance of that which we should not accept, our value in that which holds no actual value, until that which we have so long tolerated destroys us through intolerance of good, moral men — just like any host allows a parasite to devour it because the parasite utterly controls the thoughts of the host. The only difference is that we are passively volunteering to be devoured.

One last thing… to those playing the “racist” game, using this term so openly and without reserve to describe all the ills that have befallen you, I want you to stop and consider something for a moment. Perhaps you are being treated exactly how you are treating other men? Perhaps you are experiencing the Law of Nature, that is, that you should expect to be treated as you treat others? Perhaps your problem is that you are just being an asshole and so are being treated like one? And perhaps somewhere along the way you’ve simply mistaken the response of people to your being an asshole with racism? Perhaps your demand for equality would be better taken if, instead of invoking how different you are based on your race by saying others are racist, you actually treated everyone with respect, the way you want to be treated?

Or maybe you’re right… Maybe it is racism that makes you an asshole in the first place.

Either way, isn’t it time to overcome what you now know to be a totally bullshit logical fallacy and start being what you want others to be toward you? Perhaps you can do something about all the bad in your life by invoking the good in yourself and the people around you that you blame for your own disposition? Because, I have to be honest here, every time I hear you claim that racism is the reason for your self-created problems, I can’t help but consider that the only racist in the room is he that claims to be a victim of it. Besides, if you are so proud of your race (family), which you should be, what possible thing can I say or do to change that genealogical bloodline connection? Answer: not a damn thing.

If you want to end what you perceive to be racism, then you will necessarily be required to start behaving in a way that doesn’t invoke culture or race. You will have to give up your cultural heritage and act exactly how those elitist bloodsuckers want you to act… like the rest of us white debt-slaves.

Moral of the story: stop being assholes to each other.

.

–Clint > richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Wednesday, August 14st, 2019

Advertisements