The United States: Its A Trade Union, Dummy!


It’s just a trade union, dummy…

This was what I stated out loud to myself as I came to the cognitive realization that the best possible comparison of just what is the “Union” created by the Constitution of the United States is to that of a simple, organized labor (trade) union. They are a dime a dozen. Pick two and let’s compare them in their similitude.

In 1828, Webster defined what a corporation is before we had a McDonalds and Starbuck’s on every other corner, before malls and stip-malls existed. Before this, corporations were pools of organized labor and trade, such as the Virginia and East India Company, which, once settled as colonies, became bodies politic. In other words, they became politically but not naturally “independent” trade unions – commercial entities (artificial persons/corporations) under a central government.

CORPORATION – noun – A body politic or corporate, formed and authorized by law to act as a single person; a society having the capacity of transacting business as an individual. Corporations are aggregate or sole. Corporations aggregate consist of two or more persons united in a society, which is preserved by a succession of members, either forever, or till the corporation is dissolved by the power that formed it, by the death of all its members, by surrender of its charter or franchises, or by forfeiture. Such corporations are the mayor and aldermen of cities, the head and fellows of a college, the dean and chapter of a cathedral church, the stockholders of a bank or insurance company, etc. corporation sole consists of one person only and his successors, as a king or a bishop. (Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

INCORPORATE – adjective – [in and corporate.] 1. Not consisting of matter; not having a material body… (Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

CORPORATE – adjective – [Latin , to be shaped into a body, body.] 1. United in a body, or community, as a number of individuals, who are empowered to transact business as an individual; formed into a body; as a corporate assembly, or society; corporate town. 2. United; general; collectively one. They answer in a corporate voice. (Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

For years I have been challenged by the purest of unlearned, unregenerate contrarians in my dissertation and source material that the United States is indeed a corporation nation. Such a challenge 230 years ago would have been met with outrage, humiliating laughter, and public flogging as that of being a ridiculous assertion, that of course each nation is and by definition must be a corporation (called also as a body politic). Since we defined in detail just what a municipal corporation is in my last post, there is no need to further clarify here again that every district, city, county, and state government (municipal, body politic) is also a corporation — as a legal, fictional body without a material body. One cannot use the word body politic without meaning a corporation (artificial person at law). The two words are in sameness. And in the end, this means one very important thing. They’re all fiction. They don’t really Exist in Reality. No one is actually born in a nation. One is contracted and given a legal person (status) in the nation (corporation) or one is considered a foreigner (as one without lean, an alien). There is nowhere anyone can point to and say that this physical, tangible thing is or proves the actual Natural Existence of the “United States” or any other nation (corporation), any more than you can point to a Steven King novel as proof of the Natural Existence of IT or Randall Flagg. These are fictional characters and made up (incorporated) places, every one. They must be believed in to have artificial existence and authority. And yet, not ironically, they are used as the excuse to commit the worst possible crimes against Reality and Its Law of Nature.

Likewise, there are actually contrarians out there that will tell you that no “commerce” exists as a function of government. This ridiculous assertion, of course, is defeated by simply reading the constitution and US Code. In fact, without the infamous “interstate commerce” clause and its ability to control it, the United States would have little if anything to do but play with itself, all alone in its little, foreign district, completely outside of the 50 States in actual union.

Tell me why I need a surety bond to do business with the United States? Key words, here, are do business. How can I do business with the “United States” unless “United States” is a business (corporation)?

But do these definitions alone make the United States just another commercial company of the main Crown corporation under the thumb of the Vatican’s spiritual jurisdiction and civil authority?

Well, firstly we must define terms…

Just what is trade? What is commerce? Are they the same thing?

Perhaps a better question is, what in the United States is not considered as commerce?

(Hint: citizenship is commerce!)

COMMERCE – noun – 1. In a general sense, an interchange or mutual change of goods, wares, productions, or property of any kind, between nations or individuals, either by barter, or by purchase and sale; trade; traffick. Commerce is foreign or inland. Foreign commerce is the trade which one nation carries on with another; inland commerce or inland trade, is the trade in the exchange of commodities between citizens of the same nation or state. Active commerce. 2. Intercourse between individuals; interchange of work, business, civilities or amusements; mutual dealings in common life3. Familiar intercourse between the sexes4. Interchange; reciprocal communications; as, there is a vast commerce of ideas.  verb intransitive – 1. To traffick; to carry on trade. 2. To hold intercourse with. And looks commercing with the skies. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

TRADE – noun – [Latin tracto, to handle, use, treat.] 1. The act or business of exchanging commodities by barter; or the business of buying and selling for money; commerce; traffic; barter. Trade comprehends every species of exchange or dealing, either in the produce of land, in manufactures, in bills or money. It is however chiefly used to denote the barter or purchase and sale of goods, wares and merchandise, either by wholesale or retail. Trade is either foreign, or domestic or inland. Foreign trade consists in the exportation and importation of goods, or the exchange of the commodities of different countries. Domestic or home trade is the exchange or buying and selling of goods within a country. Trade is also by the wholesale, that is, by the package or in large quantities, or it is by retail, or in small parcels. The carrying trade is that of transporting commodities from one country to another by water… 3. Business pursued; occupation; in contempt; as, piracy is their trade. Hunting their sport, and plund’ring was their trade… 5. Employment not manual; habitual exercise. 6. Custom; habit; standing practice. Thy sin’s not accidental, but a trade7. Men engaged in the same occupation. Thus booksellers speak of the customs of the trade. – verb intransitive – To barter, or to buy and sell; to deal in the exchange, purchase or sale of goods, wares and merchandise, or any thing else; to traffic; to carry on commerce as a business. Thus American merchants trade with the English at London and at Liverpool; they trade with the French at Havre and Bordeaux, and they trade with Canada… 2. To act merely for money – verb transitive – To sell or exchange in commerce. They traded the persons of men. Ezekiel 27:12… (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

–=–

To the legal mind, that is, the immoral or amorally-based mind, marriage and its consummation is as well nothing but an act of commerce. Trade and barter is commerce. Money in all forms is commerce. And so is amusement, business, communication, and the mutual dealings (transactions/interchanges) in everyday life.

Of course, the most valuable trade was in slaves, the commerce of souls…

So what’s left? What part of life is not considered commerce by the legal societies and policy-makers?

The answer: no part of the fictional, commercial life of a public, common person (national citizenship) is not considered a commercial activity. A person is a vehicle for commerce and nothing else. For a man is never actually the person (status) he pretends to be in legalistic affairs, only pretending to be in sameness with that fictional character. Even driving the kids to school in a legal (illegitimate/fictional) marriage between two legal persons of the United States corporation is considered as commerce:

FAMILY CARAutomobile used to send owner’s children to school was family car.” (Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)

FAMILY AUTOMOBILE DOCTRINE – The doctrine is that one who owns and maintains an automobile (car) for the general use of his household makes use of automobile for such purposes a part of his business so that any member using automobile for those purposes under general authority to do so becomes his representative, for whose negligence he is responsible. It is an extension of the principle of respondeat superior to the relation created by operation of family use automobile. See, also, Family Car Doctrine and Family Purpose Doctrine. It is based on theory that members of family were engaged in a joint enterprise or that child was agent of parents. If an automobile is owned and maintained by a family corporation for general use of a family, such as that of corporation’s manager and one of its principal stockholders, corporation may be held liable under the “family automobile doctrine” to third parties. (Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)

–=–

In fiction, there is no such thing as a Real family, for no actual bodies exist in an incorporate state. Persons are fiction. Thus the marriage between to individuals (persons) simply creates a new incorporation, a joint personhood. It’s just words on paper, and of course illegitimate in the eyes of God and Nature, such persons having no existence in Nature. You see, for governmental, legalese purposes, a family is a business (corporation). A corporation is legally a “family” by definition. And of course all the kings subjects call the king as father. America has its founding “fathers,” having no idea what this term actually means, for every corporation (family) has a father (founder).

We must remember the fictional aspect of everything legally created, including a “family” (nation/corporate body) of legal persons. Again, when two United States persons as public citizenships get married, this is not a Real marriage in Nature between a male and a female, but instead the incorporation of two fictional (sexless) surnames, as two persons (individuals) become incorporated into one artificial body (artificial person). Thus, every action taken in the corporate marriage is a commercial act, even driving to the grocery store and tucking the kids into bed at night. It can be no other way, for the legal (commercial) persons incorporated in legal marriage are nothing more or less than commercial vessels of the United States. Persons (including individuals, corporations, associations, etc.) have no other purpose than as vessels in international/interstate commerce. And United States persons (citizenships) are always, without exception, foreigners in whatever State (territory) they reside in. The United States is always foreign to every other State or nation, and every State is private (foreign) to the United States and to each other. This is basic law.

Think about it this way… if you get married in The Matrix, a simulation of Reality, does that mean you got married in Real Life? Beware the paradox!

Again, nothing of Nature, nothing of God exists in a legal marriage, for the God of Nature is not the creator of persons (legal status in society). God, in other words, is Truth, and there is nothing but lies in the legal fiction world of men. There is no commerce in Nature, only the Truth of Natural Existence and Its Law, of Life Itself. There is only Existence alone, without words to describe or define it. It just Is… the supremacy of Being. But everything a legal person does is in fact a commercial (fictional) activity, a well told and registered lie, for persons are without exception only ever agents of government. There is no other purpose for establishing personhood than commercial activity, be it for protection, insurance, employment, or some other artificial security. When you sleep at night, the person you play in public is still considered active, which is why you can be insured for theft in the middle of the night. It is the person that the claim is made under, not the man using and posing as the person (strawman) in commerce.

Notice in the definition above that trade comes from the root of the word “use.” To use is just another word meaning to employ. Slaves were forcibly employed (used) for both commerce (trade) and labor, an alternative but certainly proper use of the legal word. Today, slavery is voluntary, ranging from contractual wage slavery to the performance debt entailed by the contractual relationship that is public citizenship. The only difference between a slave and an employee is that the employee is a prostitute, a mercenary, a laborer for hire, also called a hireling. This is a neutral term, and nothing to be offended at. The truth is often uncomfortable when understood for the first time, yet the truth can never actually offend, only set one free of one’s own lies and self-deceptions. I assure you that any and all employees of every corporation fall under the title of “hireling” as defined below. There is no public shame in this simply because the public is clueless of what exactly their shameful, public (vulgar/lowest) status means. The public is a body corporate of individual prostitutes (agents/employees), nothing more, nothing less. That is the nature of being in citizenship. No other purpose exists for citizenship than commerce. When prostituion in mammon is the custom for all “citizens” (as employees) to aspire to, and when the entire culture and education system rears nothing but prostitutes seeking a job after graduation, then who can possibly point to another US citizen-ship and accuse them of such a horrific venture in commerce? Even our parents beg us to “get a job” when we are ready to be properly used (employed) at the age of consent. It’s been built into our wage-slave culture, our entertainments, and our judgements over each other. And what is the societal misconception — that one is a loser or lazy if one is unemployed (not being used)? Amazingly, this amounts to nothing but the worship of and agentic relationship with mammon, with money, taking us all away from the simple lifestyle of tending to the land to support ourselves, our families, our neighbors, our friends, and anyone else that charitably needs what the earth provides to all without consideration of commerce, of trade, or of the greed that only money and the false valuation of our priceless Nature can cause.

EMPLOYED – This signifies both the act of doing a thing and the being under contract or orders to do it. (–Black’s Law Dictionary, 1st Edition)

EMPLOYTo engage in one’s service; to USE as an AGENT or SUBSTITUTE in transacting business; to commission and intrust with the management of one’s affairs; and, when used in respect to a servant or hired laborer, the term is equivalent to hiring, which implies a request and a contract for a compensation, and has but this one meaning when used in the ordinary affairs and business of life. (–Black’s Law Dictionary, 1st Edition)

EMPLOYverb transitive – [Latin plico.] 1. To occupy the time, attention and labor of; to keep busy, or at work; to use. We employ our hands in labor; we employ our heads or faculties in study or thought; the attention is employed, when the mind is fixed or occupied upon an object; we employ time, when we devote it to an object. A portion of time should be daily employed in reading the scriptures, meditation and prayer; a great portion of life is employed to little profit or to very bad purposes. 2. To use as an instrument or means. We employ pens in writing, and arithmetic in keeping accounts. We employ medicines in curing diseases. 3. To use as materials in forming any thing. We employ timber, stones or bricks, in building; we employ wool, linen and cotton, in making cloth. 4. To engage in one’s service; to use as an agent or substitute in transacting business; to commission and entrust with the management of one’s affairs. The president employed an envoy to negotiate a treaty. Kings and States employ embassadors at foreign courts. 5. To occupy; to use; to apply or devote to an object; to pass in business; as, to employ time; to employ an hour, a day or a week; to employ one’s life. To employ one’s self, is to apply or devote one’s time and attention; to busy one’s self. – nounThat which engages the mind, or occupies the time and labor of a PERSON; business; object of study or industry; employment. Present to grasp, and future still to find. The whole employ of body and of mind. 1. Occupation, as art, mystery, trade, profession. 2. Public office; agency; service for another. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

HIRELINGnounOne who is hired, or who serves for wages. 1. A mercenary; a prostitute. – adjectiveServing for wages; venal; mercenary; EMPLOYED for money or other compensation (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

–=–

Yes, we are so dumbed down as a society in commercial enslavement that we even employ our selves! We pay our own fictional persons (legal status in the national labor union) while we (as men) do all the work, and in return give government a cut in taxes and other extortions. How stupid is that? In other words, like all unions, we are paying the government mob-style for protection against ourselves as our own boss (employer)! Our taxes are merely dues, the protection money collected by the mob and its enforcement goons. And in exchange, our rented strawman of a person (legal status) receives both employee and consumer rights and protections from the federal union and its United States corporation (the district). Why else would you pay a for fictional character, a strawman, that only exists in “UNITED STATES” and its commercial jurisdiction? And why else would you continue to pay “UNITED STATES” taxes when you are working overseas in a different trade union (nation)? Protection money… that’s all it is! And sometimes the word protection means a knock on the head or a bullet in the gut or perhaps a stay in jail. After all, it is the right of all citizens to be put in pain, punished, taxed, licensed, and extorted (exacted) from. That’s straight outta US Code!

We can of course look at other nations (unions) and their origin to confirm this strange reality of fiction. We certainly cannot deny that the American colonies were originally properties of the Crown corporation, and were organized and run though various “companies” of that Crown, such as the Virginia Company of London, also called the London Company, and its infamous oversees partner the East India Company.

From the definition of corporation above, we can certainly understand what Canada and other countries under the Crown’s “commonwealth” and United Kingdom actually are. For you see, each city, each province, each country, and each nation are actually each separate corporations. They stand each as a corporation sole.

From my book (pages 350-51):

…This is the declaration of a line of kings (land lords), the same blood-line evoked in the British Crown coronation and false anointment ceremony in the public prayer of “may the king live forever…” This is, of course, a reference not to the man but to the Crown, passed from mortal man to mortal man in that immortal fiction of an inheritable corporation sole. May the crown corporation “live” (artificially) forever…

…The “Archbishop of Canterbury” is also an office held by a current living (mortal) man corporately (artificially) clothed in the corporation sole that is that flattering title. The office of Queen and King of England and of the United Kingdom are also in the form of corporation’s sole, where the current monarch carries a different corporate shell wherever she may travel. Elizabeth II currently presents her fictional self as the corporation sole entitled Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the United Kingdom in her most general artifice (office), though when she visits for political reasons the individual states of that kingdom, her entitled corporation sole will change intoHer Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada,” “Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Australia,” and even more specific-ally or locally as the corporation’s sole entitledHer Majesty the Queen in Right of Queensland” and “Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Alberta,” etc. These are merely artificial persons, different corporations for different districted legal jurisdictions. And we must not forget that these words used as titles of land masses are not land masses at all, but merely crown corporations (magic words) and jurisdictions in commerce with no tangible aspect at all. They are nouns/names and nothing else, built merely of words on paper pretended to be placed over territories (land) outlined on maps (simulacra) in legally created treaties. They are all fictions, just as all the cities, counties, states, and districts of the United States exist only on paper. They must be believed in (loved) to exist. This is the trap and legal matrix of the big legal lie, the antithesis to God’s Creation.

The “Lord Mayer of London” is also a corporation sole, as many offices both secular and ecclesiastical are, including the “Minister of the Government” of the Republic of Ireland and all “Vicars,” “Bishops,” and “Deans” of the church of England. Where allowed by state laws, each parish priest in the Catholic church is also a separate corporation sole. And off course, the “Registrar General,” as keeper of public records for the “taxed” and registered populous, is also in the form of a corporation sole…

–=–

With this understanding, that each city, province, and district in Canada and indeed all Crown corporation nations are indeed a separate corporation sole of the crown, we can now take a gander at how Canada’s governmental structure for commerce is set up, and why it is actually uniform in so many ways with both the United States and other nations, under the law of nations (maritime/admiralty, foreign, and interstate commerce). It’s a trade union, dummy!

Our northern neighbor named as the trade union “Canada,” of course, had similar beginnings to the United States, and we can look at Canada today (being still openly under the mother Crown corporation) to see that this fact has never actually or officially changed. For Canadians didn’t revolt nor form a separate labor union by declaring “independence” from that middle management and holding corporation of the Crown/King. Here is a list of just the federal (i.e. Crown Corporation) companies still running the show in Canada (Wikipedia linked):

–=–

Yes, these are all companies (corporations) run by the “sovereign” Crown Corporation. Indeed, the introduction to this list states:

“Canadian Crown corporations are state-owned enterprises owned by the Sovereign of Canada (i.e. the Crown).[1][2][3] They are established by an Act of Parliament or Act of a provincial legislature and report to that body via a minister of the Crown in the relevant cabinet,[4] though they are “shielded from constant government intervention and legislative oversight” and thus “generally enjoy greater freedom from direct political control than government departments.

–=–

Well, isn’t that nice? In other words, they are not only out of the control of the Canadian people as represented in government but “shielded” from the Canadian government’s oversight!

So who’s manning the roost? Who’s pulling the strings?

Why the Crown Corporation and its many artificial corporation soles, of course. The false god. The sovereign of the fictional realm…

So what went so differently in the United States?

Thanks to financial and economic mistreatment by the king of England at the time towards the Crown Corporation’s American colonies (defined as plantations/farms of the Crown), the slave-owning plantation and land owning freemasons got together and formed themselves a little congress, and then a union, as secretly and as behind the backs of management (the king) as any other labor union is formed today, and just as unwelcome by the head of any corporation.

So let’s look now at what a labor union is, what it entails, and what is the difference between a commercial nation (corporation) and an incorporated trade union?

–=–
LABOR UNION: (noun)

What It Is:

A labor union is an organization that advocates for workers’ rights and benefits through collective bargaining.

How It Works:

Labor unions represent workers in both the public and private sector. Individual labor unions represent workers in specific industries and function in an intermediary capacity between employers and employees. Unions negotiate directly with employers on employees’ behalf with regard to compensation, conditions and working hours.

Workers employed by transportation, shipping and manufacturing companies typically maintain contracts with labor unions. The unions agree to engage employers in collective bargaining in return for union dues withheld from payroll. The International Brotherhood of Teamsters and United Steel Workers are two prominent labor unions in the United States.

Why It Matters:

Labor unions protect workers from exploitation and ensure fairness of pay as well as safe, reasonable working conditions. Many economists argue that labor unions have a distortive effect on the labor market that results in decreased efficiency.

–=–

It appears the only difference between a nation and a trade/labor union is that one is local and one is universal (federal). In other words, one applies to a single corporation or type of corporate employee in trade while the other (national/federal) applies to all its federal members (citizenships) acting (in agency) as employees. Both are voluntary, contractual, legal relationships. However, each separately established trade union exists under the federal umbrella, just like the United Nations is taking over as the main trade union of the worlds nations of laborers and tradesmen.

So let’s consider for a moment…

Who sets minimum wage for laborers?

The United States (company).

Who creates all laws governing labor forces and employers (corporations) and their hirelings in America?

The United States (company).

Who created and administers OSHA?

The United States through its Department of LABOR.

“Under the OSH Act, employers are responsible for providing a safe and healthful workplace. OSHA’s mission is to assure safe and healthful workplaces by setting and enforcing standards, and by providing training, outreach, education and assistance. Employers must comply with all applicable OSHA standards. Employers must also comply with the General Duty Clause of the OSH Act, which requires employers to keep their workplace free of serious recognized hazards.”

Source: https://www.osha.gov/law-regs.html

–=–

Sounds like a LABOR union to me! Actually, it sounds like fascism light

How were these commercial companies (i.e. colonies) in the United States originally set up?

A Royal Charter from the Crown corporation.

How is a labor union set up?

A corporate charter from the federal corporation.

Hmm…

Let’s look at Fascist Italy as an example (from wikipedia) of where the idea of unions come from, and how they are part and parcel of the state. Notice that this charter was created in “articles,” just like the US Constitution and the Articles of Confederation. Coincidence, right?

The Charter of Labour of 1927 (ItalianCarta del Lavoro) was one of the main pieces of legislation Benito Mussolini, the Italian Fascist dictator from 1922–43, introduced in his attempts to modernise the Italian economy. The Charter was promulgated by the Grand Council of Fascism and publicized in the Lavoro d’Italia newspaper on April 23, 1927. It was mainly designed by Giuseppe Bottai, Under-Secretary of State of Corporations.

The Charter declared private enterprise to be the most efficient,[1] thus helping Mussolini to confirm the support of the rich industrialists who were the initial backers of Fascism. It insisted that state intervention was legitimate only where private enterprise was deficient.[2]

Article 1: “The Italian Nation is an organism having ends, life, and means of action superior to those of individuals, singly or in groups, of which it is composed. It is a moral, political, and economic unity, realized wholly in the Fascist State.”

Article 2: “Work, in all its intellectual, technical, and manual forms, is a social obligation. To this end, and only to this end, it is safeguarded by the State. The totality of production is unitary from the national point of view; its objectives are unitary and comprise the well-being of the producers and the development of national strength.”

Article 3: “There is freedom of professional or union organization. But only the union legally recognized by, and subject to, the control of the State — has the right to legally represent the entire category of employers or employees by which it is constituted […]; or to stipulate collective labor contracts binding on all those belonging to the category; or to impose on them dues, or to exercise on their behalf delegate functions of public interest.”

Article 4: “In the collective labor contract is found the concrete expression of the solidarity of the various makers of the product, by means of the conciliation of the opposing interests of the employers and the workers, and their subordination to the superior interests of production.”

Article 6: “Legally recognized professional associations insure the legal equality between employers and workers, maintain the discipline of production and work, and promotes its perfection. Corporations constitute the unitary organizations of production and integrally represent its interests […]. Corporations are recognized legally as organs of the State […].”

Article 7: “The corporative State considers private initiative, in the field of production, as the most efficient and useful instrument of the Nation.” [3]

Article 9 stated that: “State intervention in economic production may take place only where private initiative is lacking or is insufficient, or when are at stakes the political interest of the State. This intervention may take the form of control, encouragement or direct management.” [4]

Article 13: “The duty of employment is under control of the corporate organs. Employers have the obligation to hire workers who are official members of the appropriate trades, and have the power to choose from the rolls of membership, giving precedence to the members of the party and the Fascist unions according to their seniority of membership.”

–=–

Perhaps the biggest giveaway here is the use of a constitution. Yes, my friends, labor unions are constituted.

Just how do you think the “Teamsters” got created in the first place?

–=–

International Brotherhood of Teamsters

CONSTITUTION

Adopted by the
26th International Convention June 25-29, 2001

As Amended by Special Convention April 30, 2002

INTRODUCTION

The Consent Decree entered on March 14, 1989, in

United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, et al., 88 Civ. 4486 (S.D.N.Y.) (LAP), made certain amendments to the International Union’s Constitution that the courts have held are part of the Constitution despite the fact that they were rejected by the delegates to the 1991 International Convention.

The following Constitution includes Article XIX, Section 14, which is required by the Consent Decree. Language required by the Consent Decree but not approved by the delegates is printed in ITALICS. Those provisions are currently in effect…

Source: http://old1.teamster.org/about/constitution/constwebtext.pdf

–=–

So a labor union is formed by a delegation in a convention where a constitution is created… Does that sound familiar? It should. For the United States trade union was formed by a delegation of freemasons (an interstate brotherhood) in a continental convention where a constitution was created. LOL! Can it get any more obvious?

But wait, the ignorant, publicly educated, patriotic American worker demands, unions are wholly an American institution and good for the common worker, aren’t they? Isn’t that what we are told? Well sure, if you one of the few in the unions. But how is this possibly in harmony with the principles of equality and equity? It’s not, because its a fascist, communist ideal! It is exclusionary. It is the farthest from Natural Freedom possible. It’s organized crime.

In fact, like most agencies of government, including social security, we now have globalism in unions (From Wikipedia):

The International Labour Organization (ILO) is United Nations agency dealing with labour problems, particularly international labour standards, social protection, and work opportunities for all.[1] The ILO has 187 member states: 186 of the 193 UN member states plus the Cook Islands are members of the ILO.

In 1969, the organisation received the Nobel Peace Prize for improving peace among classes, pursuing decent work and justice for workers, and providing technical assistance to other developing nations.[2]

The ILO registers complaints against entities that are violating international rules; however, it does not impose sanctions on governments.

–=–

Imagine a slave-owner declaring that his slaves should be part of his own plantation labor union, which guarantees work opportunities for all! What a joke. Improving peace (commerce) among classes, as they put it above.

Yes. You read that right. International standards under international law with governance by the United Nations (united trade/labor unions). Most American workers know nothing of international law or the law of nations or the difference between the two, nor have any idea that United States law is bound under that same law of nations, even though this is a well-known fact and even stated in the constitution. Even more on point, a large percentage of “specialized” attorneys as well are not familiar with the law of nations. Specialization breeds ignorance and corruption, not only in law but in the medical, scientific, education (university syndicalism), and even labor fields. More to the point, it breeds dependence on the system — a system built on the ignorance of specialized trades and labor pools. How deliciously ironic.

Article VI § 2 states clearly that “treaties made or which shall be made under the authority of the United States” will form part of “the supreme law of the land… any thing in the constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding,” while Article II empowers the President, with the advice and consent of the Senate, to “make treaties.” In other words, at any time, foreign or international law can become part of the law of the land (due process of law). Nothing is sacred, not even the constitution, for the constitution allows not only for its own alteration (amendment) and suspension, as all constitutions ever written do, but also that at any time congress can change and alter the law to their purview. They can even alter or add to the articles (amendments) of the constitution by calling a convention, just like the Teamsters. With changing times and moral degradation as we see today in this society, so too does the law change to suit that dis-eased condition of the minds of agentic men.

From Constitution.org, we may read the history of the United States under the law of nations from its inception:

Art. I Sec. 8 Cl. 10 of the Constitution for the United States delegates the power to Congress to “define and punish … Offenses against the Law of Nations“. It is important to understand what is and is not included in the term of art “law of nations”, and not confuse it with “international law”. They are not the same thing. The phrase “law of nations” is a direct translation of the Latin jus gentium, which means the underlying principles of right and justice among nations, and during the founding era was not considered the same as the “laws”, that is, the body of treaties and conventions between nations, the jus inter gentes, which, combined with jus gentium, comprise the field of “international law”. The distinction goes back to ancient Roman Law.

Briefly, the Law of Nations at the point of ratification in 1788 included the following general elements, taken from Blackstone’s Commentaries, and prosecution of those who might violate them:

(1) No attacks on foreign nations, their citizens, or shipping, without either a declaration of war or letters of marque and reprisal.

(2) Honoring of the flag of truce, peace treaties, and boundary treaties. No entry across national borders without permission of national authorities.

(3) Protection of wrecked ships, their passengers and crew, and their cargo, from depredation by those who might find them.

(4) Prosecution of piracy by whomever might be able to capture the pirates, even if those making the capture or their nations had not been victims.

(5) Care and decent treatment of prisoners of war.

(6) Protection of foreign embassies, ambassadors, and diplomats, and of foreign ships and their passengers, crew, and cargo while in domestic waters or in port.

(7) Honoring of extradition treaties for criminals who committed crimes in a nation with whom one has such a treaty who escape to one’s territory or are found on the high seas.

And, although it was not yet firmly established with all nations in 1788,

(8) Prohibition of enslavement of foreign nationals and international trading in slaves.

To expand on point (2), Blackstone, in discussing border passes, stated “by the law of nations no member of one society has a right to intrude into another … [I]t is left in the power of all states, to take such measures about the admission of strangers, as they deem convenient.”

Source: http://constitution.org/cmt/law_of_nations.htm

–=–

What is international law?

It’s just the for-profit ethics of international commerce — the sea trade. In essence, it is the logistics of human trafficking in every way.

Of course, most powerful nations are run by either the queen and king or by their bloodline of royal cousins (lesser kings and queens). World War I, for instance, was nothing more and nothing less than a war between ruling family members of the same family — cousins pretending to fight cousins. There was no winner of these wars, nor was there a loser, for the order of inheritance of that bloodline would never change. Only a planned, purposeful shift in the balance of power and the profits of war (weapons, death, and destruction) and thus reconstruction was divided between the family, creating new familial (corporate) mergers and acquisitions, and new treaties born from the lawlessness of war. Only in war may the lawless law of necessity be invoked, allowing for any and every law to be altered or suspended. It is ridiculous to consider these wars of the “world” as anything but a reorganization of the corporation nations (unions) under bloodline rule, and only secondarily as a forced culling of the common (vulgar) goyim populaces of each. War is business, the ultimate commercial venture, plain and simple.

And, of course, what happens after war?

Why free-flowing commerce again between all the nations, of course.

What are wars fought? Because commerce is being blocked somewhere between the nations, either accidentally or intentionally (i.e. false flag) to start the war.

So what is peace really? Free flowing commerce between nations.

And so in times of peace, the nations must not only control but enforce the rules of the international law of commerce while adhering to the law of nations. Since slavery is all but poo-poo’d therein, this complicated system of labor management must be implemented, from the basic minimum wage to the most selective of trade unions.

And so we can not fool ourselves any longer with the romanticism and glory-filled fables of the founding fathers and the origins of the United States. For all intents and purposes, Philadelphia was set up as nothing more and nothing less than an international hub for international trade. It did not make men free, but rather protected slavery and indenture (contract labor). In fact, its whole purpose was to control and regulate the labor force and trade of commodities. To believe that these Crown corporations (colonies) had any other purpose than to expand trade under the Crown’s empire is of course a fools errand. And to believe that the subsequent founding of the United States was anything but the founding of a politically but not naturally “independent” trade union is purely the result of a lifetime of public education steeped in propaganda and lies — the false religion of patriots.

It’s a labor (trade) union, dummy!

This article from Unionplus.com explains the process. Pay close attention to the details…

A labor or trade union is an organization of workers dedicated to protecting members’ interests and improving wages, hours and working conditions for all.

No matter what you do for a living, there’s a union with members who do the same thing. Unions represent:

•    mechanics,
•    teachers,
•    factory workers,
•    office workers,
•    actors,
•    musicians,
•    police officers,
•    construction workers,
•    airline pilots,
•    janitors,
•    plumbers,
•    doctors,
•    pharmacists,
•    IT/computer professionals,
•    government workers at all levels,
•    engineers,
•    writers,
•    nurses,
•    and many more types of workers.

Did you know there are over 60 national/international unions that represent millions of workers across America and CanadaSee a list of AFL-CIO-affiliated unions here and a list of Change-to-Win unions here.

Unions work to make America strong.

Unions work like a democracy. They hold elections for officers who make decisions on behalf of members, giving workers more power on the job.

A local union is a locally-based group of workers with a charter from a national or international union such as the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) or United Auto Workers (UAW). A local may include workers from the same company or region. It may also have workers from the same business sector, employed by different companies.

How to form a union:

  1. It starts with the formation of a bargaining unit,  a group represented by a union for dealing with an employer.
  2. It is legal for employers to try to persuade employees not to unionize. However, it is illegal for an employer to prevent employees from unionizing through threats, violence, and other coercive action.
  3. An employer is required by law to bargain in good faith with a union, although an employer is not required to agree to any particular terms. Once an agreement is reached through negotiations, a collective bargaining agreement (CBA) is signed.
  4. After a CBA is signed, an employer can’t change details of the agreement without the union representative’s approval. The CBA lasts for a set period of time with the union monitoring to assure the employer abides by the contract. To learn more about collective bargaining and how unions work, visit CollectiveBargainingFacts.com.
  5. As with many other organizations, union costs are paid by member dues that typically cost about $50 a month. Most unions have paid staff to manage their operations. While some staff may be paid by union dues, members also often volunteer.

Everyday benefits to help working families

The collective buying power of union members is also used by Union Privilege to negotiate consumer benefit programs for working families.

Union Plus benefits and discounts are for union members and Working America members. Benefits include everything from financial services and legal services to discounts on AT&T wireless, travel, car rentals, flowers, entertainment and more.

Benefits also include unique assistance for workers facing financial hardship due to disability, layoff (unemployment), strike and more.

NOTE: No union dues money goes into the development or operation of any Union Plus program.

Link–> https://www.unionplus.org/page/how-do-unions-work

–=–

Hmm… so labor unions work just like democracies do? Interesting… no wonder the economy is so fucked up, considering that democracy is the worst governmental structure possible before tyranny takes over.  As I’ve given those quotes before, I will just reference my book here where democracy is exposed for what it really is. (Download book for free and see pages 140-45 at strawmanstory.info)

I have only one question: Why in hell wouldn’t a corporation that was unionized move its manufacturing to China or Mexico or Indonesia for cheap labor? Why should a guy with a beer belly driving a forklift make $60 an hour plus a continued, ridiculous salary for their retirement after 20 years? How is that rational? It only works in the money system, in mammon. It’s purpose is not to help the worker but to destroy the economy and ability of the nation to compete, so as to go global!

Now I can finally understand what patriotism actually is. For it is strongest amongst union members — those who benefit the most from organized trade (organized crime of government), which by its very definition is pointless without the purposeful exclusion of all others. Patriotism and Zionism are virtually the same thing. Such unionization is merely a product of mammon, of the evil that money causes men to do both directly and indirectly to other men, be it wars against nations or the patriotic stomping upon “scabs” that seek to feed their families at a lower wage. It’s really not unlike prostitution in this way at all, each unionized whore defending her own corner and glorifying out of necessity the very organized pimp that protects her (through abuse and extortion) in that organized trade union of pimped-out whores. Don’t stand on their corner, girl, cause them unionized bitches will cut you…

And tell me something… what is the difference between being a non-union member and an illegal alien?

Answer: there is no difference. You are either a member/citizen or you are not, and so you either have special privileges others do not or you don’t. Nothing could be further from the principles of True equitableness (conformity to the Law of Nature) than this.

Now, from the list above, let’s see if the so-called “congress assembled” fulfilled the above 5 requirements to form a corporation (body politic) of States (People) united? Let’s answer these questions and find out:

(1) Did the United States form a bargaining unit (i.e. congress), as a group representing a union of commercial entities (i.e. the colonies/states in union) for dealing with a principal employer/user (employer/king) in commerce? Certainly they did!

(2) Debate as to unionize or not certainly took place, e.g. the federalists and non-federalists. And they certainly tried to persuade the king (employer) in a host of good and bad ways, such as the Boston Tea Party. As a sovereign (false god) though, the king could make threats, commit violence, and use other coercive actions all he liked per the already established union contract of his companies (colonies). Turns out, through Executive Orders, so too can the United States in its own sovereign capacity. Just look at the civil war…

(3) Was there negotiations? Of course. Was the king (principal of the “collective” Crown Corporations) required to accept any particular terms? Obviously not, since war insued shortly thereafter. Was a collective bargaining agreement signed, like say, the constitution for the united States and a treaty of peace (free-flowing commerce)? Yep.

(4) Is the constitution changeable without the union’s representatives (congress’s) approval? Nope.

(5) Are union costs and dues paid by the states and the common laborers (citizenships) thereof? Absolutely. In politics it’s called taxes though.

To answer in another way:

How was the US formed as a trade “Union”?

1. The Union started with a congressional unit for bargaining, as a confederation (conspiracy/combination of unsatisfied men), who represented each State (land-holding People) in dealings with the King (employer, owner of company/colonies)

2. The anti-federalists would qualify as employees of the King seeking non-unionization (non-federalization).

3. The King did not and was not required to agree to the terms of the continental congress. After the war (quite violent negotiations), a treaty of peace agreement was signed, allowing the United States to be its own Trade “Union.”

4. The law and the constitution cannot be changed without congress and the president’s approval.

5. The Union of States is paid for by taxes from member employees (US citizenships) and corporations (artificial persons), as what is “due” for such member/citizen-ship. Citizenship is voluntary, as is membership to any union, and is an act of allegiance to that union, its laws, and its president.

 

–=–

Well, there you have it. The creation of the united States of America was basically the formation of a labor/trade union. Plain and simple. And like any automatous creation, the creation eventually got a bit out of the hands of its creator, the king. Or, at least, that’s what we are supposed to believe. We’ll keep pretending that nations stand in competition. After all, it keeps the false economy going.

Now don’t get me wrong, it wasn’t as if the indentured and common citizenry actually had a vote, and slaves certainly did not carry a voice in the matter. No, this was a bunch of land and plantation holders whining not for the benefit of their slaves, but for their own benefits as employees of the Crown Corporation. And so, when their desires were not met by the king, they formed their own “union” in trade (commerce), not the least of which was the protection of their own commerce in souls (slaves).

—=—

“How is it that we hear the loudest yelps for liberty
among the drivers of negroes?”

—Samuel Johnson, quoted from: ‘Taxation No Tyranny – An Answer To The Resolutions And Address Of The American Congress.’

—=—

“For, brethren, ye have been called unto liberty;
only
use not liberty for an occasion to the flesh,
but by love serve one another.”

—Galatians 5:13, KJB

—=—

In the constitution for the United States, the Commerce Clause refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3 of the U.S. Constitution, which gives Congress the power “to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes. And, of course, the Constitution, in its fourth Article, cannot be mistaken in this clear and concise statement:

“No person held to service or labor in one State, under the laws thereof, escaping into another, shall, in consequence of any law or regulation therein, be discharged from such service or labor, but shall be delivered up, on claim of the party to whom such service or labor may be due.

–=–

Most Americans, as common US citizens, don’t even know what the word “several” means, a word defined as private or foreign. Yes, each State (People) is foreign to the other, just as the United States (Washington D.C.) is foreign to all States and nations. And most will read this statement of the fourth Article and never fully grasp what is really being said. For like branded cattle, so too shall men be rounded up to be delivered to the People (State) they belong to as property!

Later, of course, with the passage of the reformation amendments (#13, 14, and 15), slaves were enfranchised (set legally free in an open air debtors prison) as national citizenships and, through the assigning of personhood (14th amendment citizenship) as newly incorporated commercial vessels, were suddenly unionized as the persons (property) of government. And so suddenly one could no longer string a “negro” (man with tainted blood) up from a tree without repercussions of law. Where before was just a negro now stood a person (status/property) of the United States corporation. Suddenly each negro was a valued property (voluntary slave) of government, and was protected as such. The slaves were allowed to join the labor/trade union in its lowest possible status of membership, called as public citizenship. This was called colloquially as freedom, which in legalese merely means franchiseAnd since that time, with the advent of the birth certificate process, we are all tricked into volunteering our children into such 14th amendment servitude (public/national citizenship), having no idea we are giving up our paternal rights and making all children as wards of the state (District of New Columbia). Slaves were not elevated as much as all others were devolved. Yet what slave “freed” from forced captivity would not gladly except the protections and benefits of freed (enfranchised) men? What slave would not embrace the union that tricked them into joining it, which without it they would surely perish? And now all US citizenships are of equal franchise, equal (civil) rights, as the lowest possible protected status possible. And in the end, isn’t that exactly what a labor union does? Do not unions organize and protect the lowest possible working class of laborers and tradesmen to make them “equalized,” as compared to the wealthy elite families that have always ruled through such trickery and unionization? The truth is that, just as it is said above that “unions work to make America strong,” so too did slaves and indentures before unionization (federalization). And so too does each nation now work to support the United Nations and other globalist efforts — one big labor union of earthlings, of “world citizens.”

You see, we have all been placed into the “district” of the United States jurisdiction, a place for the lowest class to reside in servitude. And yet most of us have no idea what a district really is:

—=—

DISTRICT:

“A division of territory.
1. Originally,
the space within which a lord could coerce and punishdistrain.
The circuit within which a man might be compelled to appear,
or the place in which one hath the power of distraining.”

—William C. Anderson’s Dictionary of Law, 1889, definition of ‘District.’

—=—

And what is a circuit? Why an enclosed space. A jurisdiction. In other words, an open-air prison for debtors (citizens). Citizenship is a contractual performance debt.

How may times have you heard that the United States is still a British colony? Well, it’s probably more accurate to say that the United States is still a commercial corporation of the Crown, seemingly independent as it may be. In other words, the people (citizenships) of the United States are about as independent from the Crown as an automobile worker is from the company he or she works for. That is, just because the employees (citizenships) are in a Union (i.e. a corporation/company called “United States”) doesn’t make them any less subjects of the Crown. The United States and its congress (Board of directors) are collective bargainers for their public citizenry, standing as a person in law. After all, the constitution was strictly a commercial, maritime deal. The union formed was for their own protection, not ours, just as labor unions are not inclusive of management and owners. This class distinction has not left us, though fools pretend it no longer applies. We were still slaves and indentures, or of families that had not yet even arrived in the country! Nothing changed on that front. No, in this case, the employees of the Crown Corporation were the land and plantation holders sent on Royal Charter here to set up just another trade corporation, a commercial hub dealing in international trade districted under the mother Crown corporation.

At this point, it seems so obvious! How did I not recognize this before?

Of course modern labor unions are labeled as “communist” for good reason, simply because they are run by the State, as state-controlled capitalism, not against it. While the US constitution was essentially the creation of a company store, where employees (citizenships) were paid in United States dollars (company script) and forced to use that script in place of any other form of trade with any other currency or metal.

So, for all intents and purposes, the United States of America is a corporation set up essentially as a trade union. It’s all about commerce.

As a similar example, let’s take a peak at the Egyptian trade union story:

Egyptian Independent Union Federation, 28 June 2011

Statement: In light of the growing controversy about the independent trade unions and malicious accusations and allegations aimed at undermining the Egyptian workers’ movement and the trade unions which it created, we, the representatives of the independent unions, are signing this statement of the fundamental principles on which they are being built and on which trade unions which represent workers are founded. 1. Independent unions have appeared in Egypt ending an era during which trade union work has been monopolised by the state and the ruling party. This is due to the struggle of the Egyptian workers and their sacrifices, and nobody can claim otherwise. At the same time we extend our thanks and greetings to all those who support the principles of trade union freedom and the right to organise so long as this support iswithout conditions. 2. The independent unions confirm their independence from all political parties, official institutions and organisations, human rights organisations, and individuals. The independent unions confirm that they only follow the wishes of the general assemblies of their members and that the principle of independence is a general principle which applies to all without exception. In the same vein, the independent unions assert that only elected representatives from the base of the unions have theright to speak on behalf of the trade unions and declare their positions, and that no outside parties have the right to do so, unless those positions have been agreed by the elected representatives of the independent unions. 3. The independent unions depend for their funding on the contributions of their members and will not accept financial support from any other source at home or abroad. The general assemblies have complete authority for the financial supervision of the unions. We affirm that this principle self-reliance and self-funding is an inseparable part of the principle of independence on which the unions were founded. 4. We affirm that this principle of independence dates from before the revolution and that the revolution came to bless this perspective and to issue laws to protecting this same principle, the first of which was the constitutional declaration on the right to form unions and the announcement of the principle of trade union freedoms. This declaration contributed to Egypt’s name being removed from the ILO blacklist of countries violating workers’ rights as did the draft law on trade union freedoms. We affirm that the principle of independence is not tied to an individual or a government but is a fundamental right of all of who work for a wage in this country, and they will not give it up in any circumstances. 5. The independent unions completely reject any form of normal relations with the Zionist enemy, as they reject all forms of co-operation with any person or organisation who is involved in normalisation or is calling for normalisation. We affirm our complete support for the right of the Arab Palestinian people to create an independent state in the whole of Palestine, and their right to use whatever means of resistance to achieve their rights. We affirm also that one of the principal reasons forour rejection of the old Egyptian Trade Union Federation is its subservience to the state and the National Democratic Party, and its participation in a visit to occupied Jerusalem and its failure to take any position opposing the policy of normalization, such as the QIZ [Qualified Industrial Zones] Agreement and the gas supply agreement and other policies which the Egyptian Trade Union Federation by its silence supported while the Egyptian workers’ movement rejected them and was resisting them. 6. The independent unions value the Arab people’s struggle for freedom and social justice. Long live the Egyptian Revolution! Eternal glory to the Martyrs! 

Egyptian Independent Union Federation Signatories:

1. The Real Estate Tax Authority Union
2. The General Public Transport Authority Workers’ Union
3. The General Union of Civil Aviation Pilots
4. The General Union of Builders and Woodworkers
5. The Egyptian Peasants’ Union
6. The General Union of Antiquities Workers
7. The General Union of Sales Tax Workers
8. The General Union of Health Sciences
9. The General Independent Union of Teachers
10. The General Union of Communications Workers
11. The Manshiyet al-Bakri Hospital Workers’ Union
12. Du’aa Hospital Union
13. The General Union of Workers in the Ministry of Labour
14. The Media Production Workers Union
15. The General Union of Pensioners

Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/59594040/Egyptian-Unions-Declaration-of-Independence

–=–

Gee, doesn’t the Egyptian Trade Union Federation sound a lot like the United States federal corporation trade union and its government over all international and interstate trade/commerce, even down to its notorious beating of civil rights protestors as in American history? It loves the illegal occupation called Israel, that’s certainly in common.

So if a trade union and a nation can both be a federation, just what is a federation?

FEDERATION – noun – 1. The act of uniting in a league2. A league; a confederacy(–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

CONFEDERACY – Criminal law. An agreement between two or more persons to do an unlawful act, or an act, which though not unlawful in itself, becomes so by the confederacy. The technical term usually employed to signify this offense, is conspiracy. (–Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856)

CONSPIRACY – Criminal law, torts. An agreement between two or more persons to do an unlawful act, or an act which may become by the combination injurious to others (–Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856)

–=–

Of course! What is a union but an unwanted, unwelcome organization of conspirators against the company or already established union? Be it a workforce or a People, their union is but a combination of two or more people to do an unlawful act, unlawful either under the king, under the nation, or under the corporate by-laws.

Sorry folks. Just as the confederacy was a conspiracy against the United States, so too was the constitution a conspiracy against the king of England. The only difference is that the United States never officially recognized the confederacy as a union. If it had, it would not have been able to treat confederate citizens in such horrible ways. In other words, the “Union’s” actions would have fallen under the purview of the law of nations if the Confederacy was recognized as a separate union.

We can verify this easily, by visiting the government website for Appamotix Courthouse, where they tell us exactly why the north was able to treat its own members like dirt. For you see, a civil war never ends, it’s merely suspended until the next confederation (conspiracy/combination) of men attempt to form their own union:

Where was the treaty signed? 

There was no treaty signed to end the Civil War. The surrender at Appomattox Court House was a military surrender of an army which was surrounded. The Confederate government never surrendered and even had it wanted to the United States government would likely not have accepted. To do so would have legally acknowledged the existence of the Confederate States of America and would have legitimized it and given it certain legal status internationally. Treaties are between two nations and the U.S. would never concede the legal existence of the Confederacy – even though it had a government, armies, taxes and all the trappings of a modern government.”

Source: https://www.nps.gov/apco/faqs.htm

–=–

Honestly, this simple explanation describes the evil underbelly of the so-called civil war, the war of Northern aggression, almost entirely. In essence, the “union” had no law, no moral or ethical considerations, and no peers on the international level. They could treat their fellow citizens considered still bound and inside of the union with absolute disregard under Executive Order, and they did. And just as the king sent his troops to preserve his own union (company) because he didn’t recognize the United States as a legitimate conspiracy (confederacy) and thus refused to concede its separate legal existence internationally and thus outside of his vast union of commercial companies, so too did the congressionally abandoned, now illegitimate United States completely disrespect the desires of its confederate states to be free and independent of that original confederated union. Conspiracy breeds conspiracy. This is not the story we are told in history class, that’s for sure. There was nothing honorable or patriotic about the civil war, and if anything, it should be a lesson to all of us in the common that we are considered property of the union, and certainly not free men. And as far as the modern ridiculousness of the state successionist movement, all one need do is read their state constitution to find that succession would be a treasonous crime and theft of territory and property from the Union, and those modern confederates would be equally punishable as was the original conspiracy (confederacy) to separate, for the succession would again not be recognized by the union and have no protection as a nation under the law of nations or international law. Only a fool believes that a civil war is about race. Civil is not skin color, its law. Roman law. And only one that is unlearned in this history can possibly believe that the North or its Union President Lincoln had the best interest of slaves as their goal. It was nothing more and nothing less than a war to preserve the corporate union. But more importantly, as we can read above, the truth about the civil war is that it never ended, for there were not two nations to sign a treaty. No, this was a smackdown, and still is. For by the Trading With The Enemies Act we are all still considered as potential conspirators, or as they legally refer to us, potential enemies of the state. Honestly, I’ve talked and reported on this so many times from primary sources that I won’t take the time to do it again here.

But wait just another minute… Doesn’t this Egyptian unionization document sound a lot like a Declaration of Independence, like they want to be independent from the first union and its government/king?

There are 15 unions listed above, all wanting independence from the federal or sovereign state. Doesn’t that sound a bit similar to the current 16 commonwealth realms of the Crown Corporation?

“A Commonwealth realm is a sovereign state that is a member of the Commonwealth of Nations and shares the same person, currently Elizabeth II, as its head of state and reigning constitutional monarch, but retains a crown legally distinct from the other realms. As of 2017, there are sixteen Commonwealth realms: Antigua and BarbudaAustraliaBarbadosBelizeCanadaGrenadaJamaicaNew ZealandPapua New GuineaSaint Kitts and NevisSaint LuciaSaint Vincent and the GrenadinesSolomon IslandsThe BahamasTuvalu and the United Kingdom.” (–Wikipedia)

COMMONWEALTHSMAN – noun – One who favors the commonwealth, or a republican government. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

COMMONWEALCOMMONWEALTH – noun – 1. An established form of government, or civil polity; or more generally, a state; a body politic, consisting of a certain portion of men united by compact or tacit agreement, under one form of government and system of laws. This term is applied to the government of Great Britain, which is of a mixed character, and to other governments which are considered as free or popular, but rarely or improperly, to an absolute government. A commonwealth is properly a free state; a popular or representative government; a republic; as the commonwealth of Massachusetts. The word signifies strictly, the common good or happiness; and hence, the form of government supposed best to secure the public good. 2. The whole body of people in a state the public. 3. The territory of a state; as, all the land within the limits of the commonwealth. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

WEAL – noun – [G., Latin , to be strong, to avail, to prevail. The primary sense of weal is strength, soundness, from the sense of straining, stretching or advancing.] 1. A sound state of a person or thing; a state which is prosperous, or at least not unfortunate, not declining; prosperity; happiness. As we love the weal of our souls and bodies. The weal or wo in thee is place. So we say, the public weal the general weal the weal of the nation or state. 2. Republic; state; public interest. [But we now use commonwealth, in the sense of state.]  noun – The mark of a stripe. [See Wale.]… (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

–=–

What was it that Ben Franklin was quoted as saying after the signing of the constitution…? A republic, if you can keep it.

So how then is the United States different than any other “commonweal” of the Crown Corporation? That’s common welfare, not wealth. Big difference. Welfare is for the poor, common plebes like you and me. All the union States in compact are republics (commonwealths) too, kept by austerity and military force, in fact.

It is important to note here this word as it was meant to be understood, as a common weal, not the vulgar meaning of just monetary wealth.

Commonwealth (U.S. state)

Commonwealth is a designation used by four of the 50 states of the United States in their full official state names: Kentucky[1] (the law creating Kentucky names it the “State of Kentucky”[2] but it was originally part of the land grant of the Colony of Virginia), Massachusetts,[3] Pennsylvania,[4] and Virginia.[5] Each was, prior to 1776, British colony, or parts thereof, and share a strong influence of English common law in some of their laws and institutions.[6][7]

The term “commonwealthdoes not describe or provide for any specific political status or legal relationship when used by a state.[8] Those that do use it are equal to those that do not. A traditional English term for a political community founded for the common good, it is used symbolically to emphasize that these states have a “government based on the common consent of the people”[9] as opposed to one legitimized through their earlier colonial status that was derived from the British crown. It refers to the common “wealth”, or welfare, of the public[10] and is derived from a loose translation of the Latin term res publica.[a]

–=–

Social security is a tool of universal welfare, plain and simple. Pension funds are welfare for the middle class, and are as well mostly paid for by commonweal taxpayer dollars. Common welfare – this is exactly the term one might use in any corporate office, for the welfare of employees.

Common = corporate (united).

Union = common franchise under contract/compact

Franchise = legal (artificial) freedom, a district

Commonwealth = An incorporated state (people)

But if all the member states of the Crown Corporation, including the United Kingdom, are commonwealths, and all of the states in the American union are commonwealths as well, then where does that leave us? Is the world just one gigantic set of trade unions in commonweal controlled by a collaboration (conspiracy/confederation/combination) of centralized, federal ones? Well of course! This is not the earth, not Nature we are talking about, but the fictional world of commerce. The earth and its nature is already global. It can’t help itself for being that way (sorry flat-earthers) nor is its nature and shape a causality of man. But this commercial sphere must be shaped and textured by the commercial powers that be — the federal trade unions known as nations that operate under the international law of nations.

What are sanctions, for instance, but limitations on trade? A sanction is merely a punishment applied to worldwide commerce with a particular country, so that no trade may be done internationally therein. It’s like being having one’s membership to the commonwealth of the world taken away or limited for a period of time until agreement (contract) is made. Though international law has no sanctions, the law of nations is a club, a commonwealth of commercial states, and generally one of them (as the United States) is commissioned as the “evil” to bring obedience to some statute or condition of signed treaties. Before war, sanctions (punishments) are used to attempt to cause balance to worldwide commerce. In other words, smaller unions (nations) are allowed to exist as long as they play by the rules of the law of nations, and their regimes are subsequently toppled and replaced if they don’t. By comparison, all trade unions are under the thumb of the nation’s trade and employment cycle they effect, i.e. the United States. Internationally, more and more, all nations (unions) are under the purview of the United Nations. So what’s the difference?

Here’s an interesting read to put into perspective how close we indeed are to an international cooperative trade union (international) globalization:

The member states of the Commonwealth of Nations are mostly former British colonies, as is the United States, so why isn’t the United States a member of the Commonwealth of Nations?

There’s no reason it couldn’t be. It is simply too lazy to apply.

Many Americans think the USA would have to become a monarchy if it joined the Commonwealth, but this is simply not true. India, for example, is not a monarchy, but is in the Commonwealth.

Member countries do have to recognise the queen as Head of the Commonwealth, but that’s just like a country recognising Kofi Annan as the Secretary General of the United Nations, it doesn’t make her their queen.

Some people think that the USA would somehow be accepting ‘British rule’ if it was in the Commonwealth. Try telling India it is still ruled by Britain! In fact, joining would not require any kind of constitutional adjustment at all.

Some Americans think they can’t be in the Commonwealth ‘because they fought for their independence’. But all the members of the Commonwealth are entirely independent and many fought to become so, Kenya for example, so this argument makes no sense either.

The reality is:

The Commonwealth is open to any country which has had at any time either constitutional or administrative ties to at least one current member of the Commonwealth of Nations.

Traditionally, new Commonwealth members had ties to the United Kingdom. And considering we have invaded practically everywhere at some point most places do! Sorry Mongolia!

We were too busy drinking tea to invade the places in white.

.

Of course, as the USA has ties to the UK it would be eligible to join. Countries do have to be democracies with at least minimal respect for human rights (Fiji, Nigeria, Pakistan, and Zimbabwe have all been suspended at times for failing to do so).

I’ve been led to believe that the USA is a democracy with OK’ish human rights, so you’re good there too.

There are many other countries that could be part of the Commonwealth if they wanted to, including The Republic of Ireland, Israel, Egypt, Iraq, Afghanistan and numerous others – even France! And there are even two countries in the Commonwealth now that never actually had British ties: Rwanda and Mozambique.

So, the reason for not joining is just inertia and lack of ‘can do’ attitude.

Shake off your sloth, America, and join us!*

Source: https://www.quora.com/The-member-states-of-the-Commonwealth-of-Nations-are-mostly-former-British-colonies-as-is-the-United-States-so-why-isnt-the-United-States-a-member-of-the-Commonwealth-of-Nations

–=–

Logical, but foolish, considering the list of grievances in the declaration of independence.

Again I must ask here, what is globalism but a unification of already established trade (commerce) unions (nations), a placing together of all labor pools (common populations) so as to form one giant labor/trade union, where everyone is identified digitally with Social Security numbers and other marks and branding of common beasts of burden?

One last note and reason on why the United States corporation is just a trade union…

Out here in legal hell (the district), we are stupid enough to hire an attorney (agent) from the BAR Association (part of the Executive Branch Dept. of Justice) for representation, which is a sign of incompetence in an admitted state of non compos mentis. But when the company does something bad to an employee that is a labor union member, the employee then files grievances through the organized power of the union that represents (as agent/attorney) that employee (in United States persona/status/mask). And so it is safe to say that the main reason for starting a trade union in the first place is because the employees have unheard or unanswered grievances outstanding and that nothing is being done with them by the corporation.

So how is this any different than when the colonists formed the Declaration of Independence and in doing so listed all of their own many grievances against the king of England as head of the Crown corporation?

I, for one, fail to see any substantial difference. They formed “a more perfect union”, one more “perfect” than what the Articles of Confederation (Conspiracy) entailed. In other words, the management employees of the Crown corporation formed a trade union for land and plantation holders, as a union of People (States/commonwealths). Since all unions of this sort, being called as nations, are under the law of nations, I don’t see how they are any different from any other trade union except in their “federal” capacity. Each has its own area of the globe to manage behind jurisdictional lines, and all international trade is done through corporate contract under admiralty/maritime law (law of the flag at sea).

What does the Coast Guard do?

NVDC – The National Vessel Documentation Center facilitates maritime commerce and the availability of financing while protecting economic privileges of United States citizens…

That’s what a union does, alrighty.

The coast guard practices maritime law enforcement. It does not protect the sea, it protects the commercial law of the sea. It protects international monopolies on commerce and prevents non-union members (i.e. illegal aliens) from entering the union to work.


It’s commerce and nothing but commerce!

The coast guard has not always been named the coast guard, of course. In fact, it has always been about commerce, or more accurately, revenue.

Perhaps you’ve notice this symbol on the US dollar:

–=–

Before it was renamed, the Department of Treasury of the United States was originally the Treasury of North America. Why? Because it was a Crown corporation holding for the geographical area known as North America.

Likewise, the coast guard has not always carried on under that name. It was originally the Revenue Cutter Service (from Wikipedia):

The United States Revenue Cutter Service was established by an act of Congress (1 Stat. 175) on 4 August 1790 as the Revenue-Marine upon the recommendation of Secretary of the Treasury Alexander Hamilton to serve as an armed customs enforcement service. As time passed, the service gradually gained missions either voluntarily or by legislation, including those of a military nature. It was generally referred to as the Revenue-Marine until July 1894, when it was officially renamed the Revenue Cutter Service.

President Woodrow Wilson signed into law the Coast Guard Act on 28 January 1915. This act combined the U.S. Revenue Cutter Service with the United States Life-Saving Service to form the new United States Coast Guard. The U.S. Coast Guard assumed the responsibilities of the United States Lighthouse Service in 1939 and the Navigation and Steamboat Inspection Service in 1942.

In 1990, the Commandant of the Coast Guard, Admiral Paul A. Yost, Jr. established a military award known as the Coast Guard Bicentennial Unit Commendation, which commemorated the original founding of the U.S. Revenue Cutter Service.[25]

–=–

Revenue comes only from commerce. The logical fallacy then would be to assume that the job of the coast guard is to rescue and save lives, for that’s what every television propaganda piece shows. There’s certainly no coincidence that the term television commercials have the word commerce in them. They are advertisements for commerce. Thus one would expect to see the Revenue (customs) Cutter Service commercially advertised, while at the same time portraying it as if angels in whirlybirds will always be there to come to save us, heroes out to help the common folk. Nope. They are tax collectors and customs enforcers. They work for the Union. They ensure free-flowing commerce and the fees (customs) extorted therefrom. And yes, a small part of that happens to be search and rescue. And no, this is not an honorable job. It’s trafficking.

MERCHANT – One who is engaged in the purchase and sale of goods; a trafficer; a traderA man who trades or carries on trade with foreign countries, or who exports and imports goods and sells them by wholesale. Webster. Merchants of this description are commonly known by the name of “shipping merchants.” (–Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)

MERCENARIUS –  Latin. A hireling or servant(–Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)

MERCES – Latin. In the civil law, reward of labor in money or other things. As distinguished from “pemio,” it means the rent of farms, (prædia rustici.) (–Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)

–=–

What is traffic? Part of transportation.

What is transportation? Part of commerce.

We just can’t win… for, since governments can only control commerce, they have turned everything we do (in person/legal status) into a commercial (legalized) act. And yes, that includes sexual reproduction and dropping the kids off at a government sanctioned school. To control the common population, every aspect of life must be recreated, renamed, and turned into a legal action. To accomplish this, we are all given legal (fictional) vessels of commerce, also called persons (status in society). Thus we are all put into commerce, which means we are all in competition. Our problem is not selfishness, for we are not acting as ourselves. We are acting as commercial vessels, as agents for our principal employer, the union government of the corporation of “United States.” No self, no selfishness. No, we suffer from the side effects of a money (evil) driven society in mammon. We suffer from greed. We suffer because we do not love on another. How can we if we don’t love or even use our True Selves?

 

–=–

In peace and war… In other words, in free-flowing international commerce (peace) and when commerce is blocked (war). We kill those who don’t like our system of commerce and its sanctioned rules, and we throw money at those who do. But that’s ok, we can always create more money. It, or rather, its value, doesn’t really exist. For what is evil (opposed to Nature/God) but that which is artificial, and what can be more evil than a respected lie?

This nation was created in commerce, and then recreated by civil war in commerce.

After the Coercive or “Intolerable” Acts were passed by the British Parliament, the colonies had a giant list of grievances, which were eventually enumerated in the Articles of Confederation (Conspiracy/Combination) and addressed in the constitution. Some examples of the grievances that were addressed in the constitution, so as to form what — a more perfect UNION — and ensuring that all states have representation in Congress, which sets taxes, are as follows:

Here are just some of the grievances solved by the forming of this new union of States under the articles of a confederation (conspiracy) and constitution.

Grievance #1 – Taxation without representation, while today we are over-taxed with representation

Grievance #2 – The King had absolute power, and now Congress has the reserved power to override Presidential veto

Grievance #3 – Colonists were not allowed to publicly speak out against or criticize the King (corporation), now addressed by the 1st Amendment, as “Freedom of Speech”

Grievance #4 – The Quartering Act (part of the Coercive Acts) forced colonist to house troops, now addressed by the 3rd Amendment, as “no quartering of troops”

Grievance #5 – The King allowed homes to be searched without warrants, now addressed in the constitution by the 4th Amendment, as “no unwarranted search and seizure”

Grievance #6 – There was no trial by jury of peers required, now addressed in the constitution by the 6th and 7th Amendments, as the “speedy and public trial by an impartial jury,” and the “right of trial by jury”

–=–

Well heck, this sounds like some of the grievances that might be found in any shitty job, doesn’t it? Don’t talk shit about the president or the middle management, don’t search my office and personal belongings without permission, don’t speak to me without my union representative being present, don’t overcrowd my office or cubicle… Just the typical and never-ending battle between management and employees.

And hey, has anyone even stopped to consider that the “Labor Party” is a political party in England? LOL! How much more obvious does it get?

Isn’t the democratic and republican party system in the United States just the laborers and tradesmen vs the corporate owners and managers?

The United States… It’s a trade union, dummy!

Still don’t believe it? Well then why don’t you go try and get a job without using your trade union identification card, your United States citizenship information, birth certificate, driver’s license, and social security number? Good luck, because most corporations won’t hire you without union affiliation, that is, United States federal ID. Why? Because the union (United States) requires it. A corporation cannot exist in the United States without agreeing to US law! Without it, you are just a scab.

Fortunately for us disenfranchised common scabs out here that don’t wish to participate in that unionized system of taxation, there is still the chance to be hired secretly, as an illegal worker, one not using United States union membership. We call this working under the table. And in doing so, we are no different than any other illegal alien out there. We are all scabs if we try to actually be Naturally Free. In fact, isn’t that what the mark of the beast will represent, a united union membership ID, while all non-marked men will be veritable scabs outside that monopoly of unions/nations unable to work, buy, sell, or TRADE?

Such is legal life on the unionized planet earth!

Before I sign off, there is one more word we must discuss. Most of you reading this will go back to your job tomorrow without conscious awareness of the routine, customary enslavement your employment represents. I understand perfectly this effect of cognitive dissonance mixed with the usual mouths to feed and bills to pay excuses. I get it. It’s a commercial trap. You cannot participate in commerce without allowing yourself to be used (employed) by that which enslaves you in its money system — a veritable company store called the economy. And the same old excuses will be used even as we watch nature unfold and the darkness of our collective employments in support of the big lie that is society is visible and undeniable. We will employ ourselves in our own demise and justify it any way we can, even as our children suffer the same and even worse effects. But hey, at least they won’t be hungry, and they can be entertained and babysat by affordable computers and “smart” phones while they get dumber and dumber, perfectly trained subjects to fill their parents shoes as useless eaters fulfilling mindless occupations that only contribute to the very structure that enslaves them! But I understand, we’ve all been entertained and educationally entrained that we are being brave, nurturing, and even responsible by working 8 hours a day and paying babysitters and the public school system to surrogate. Actually, this is the easy route, being an irresponsible parent in the unionized employment system. And ease is one of the grand old sins. Knock knock Neo, you’re in the legal, commercial matrix!

What is a job?

JOB – noun – [of unknown origin, but perhaps allied to chop, primarily to strike or drive.] 1. A piece of work; any thing to be done, whether of more or less importance. The carpenter or mason undertakes to build a house by the job. The erection of Westminster bridge was a heavy job; and it was a great job to erect Central wharf, in Boston. The mechanic has many small jobs on hand. 2. A lucrative business; an undertaking with a view to profit. No cheek is known to blush nor heart to throb, Save when they lose a question or a job. 3. A sudden stab with a pointed instrument. [This seems to be nearly the original sense.] To do the job for one, to kill him. – verb transitive – To strike or stab with a sharp instrument1. To drive in a sharp pointed instrument verb intransitive – To deal in the public stocks; to buy and sell as a broker. The judge shall job the bishop bite the town, and mighty dukes pack cards for half a crown.

SMART – noun – [This word is probably formed on the root of Latin amarus, bitter, that is, sharp.] 1. Quick, pungent, lively pain; a pricking local pain, as the pain from puncture by nettles; as the smart of bodily punishment2. Severe pungent pain of mind; pungent grief; as the smart of affliction.  verb intransitive – 1. To feel a lively pungent pain, particularly a pungent local pain from some piercing or irritating application. Thus Cayeene pepper applied to the tongue makes it smart. 2. To feel a pungent pain of mind; to feel sharp pain; as, to smart under sufferings3. To be punished; to bear penalties or the evil consequences of any thing. He that is surety for a stranger shall smart for itProverbs 11:15 adjective – 1. Pungent; pricking; causing a keen local pain; as a smart lash or stroke; a smart quality or taste…

–=–

Ah, so that’s why hitmen and contract killers get assigned a job.

Every business is a job to its intended customers. Why? Because every product out there is sold at interest, with profit and gain in mind. Every business is out to smart its customers, and for that matter, its employees with low pay and no share in the profits. The actual value matters not, only supply and demand. Corporations must make profit or they must die (figuratively). Thus, entire continents of people will be starved to death in order for corporations (artificial persons, including governments) to make money, the root of all evil. So what is your job? What part do you play in the jobbing of others? Can any of you reading this say with a clear conscious that your job doesn’t lead to stabbing everyone else in the back or taking advantage of anyone? What is your end product? What is your end service? What is the point to your employment? Would you do it without pay? In other words, what is it that you are allowing yourself to be used (employed) for in order to earn money as a corporate prostitute? Just asking…

We are all acting as surety for a United States person in our job, and we are all smarting each other because of it. One’s accumulated debt in college loans show how smart one actually is.

All this because the meaning of the words that enslave you and cause you to harm others are all but lost in translation.

But by all means, don’t let this distract you from all your smart technology. There’s a job to do.

So long, from a fellow dummy, just figuring it all out as I go…

.

–Clint > richard-son (Realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Wednesday, June 13th, 2018

Republican National Party Is Member Of International Democrat Union (IDU)


In these modern, strong delusional times, it is often hard to see the forest through the trees and to distinguish the lies from reality. Even the principles of law conclude that a lie may be confirmed and ratified as a legal “truth,” that black may be declared as white, left right, and up down. In short, we live in a democracy.

Plato wrote in his 5 regimes that this state of democracy is only the lowest form of humanity before the final step of total tyranny, from which a reset happens as the pure aristocracy reestablishes itself as the cure for democracy and tyranny, the repeating cycle of all the ages. Like the phoenix rising from its own spent ashes, these planned revolutions apparently reestablish the old order as the new order, the bloodlines of the ages appearing in new form and title. Same as the old boss…

But there is something new on the horizon. For we are witnessing global government for the first time in history. It’s not so much that this notion of globalist rule wasn’t already established long ago with such beauties as Unum Sanctum and other bull-shit from the powers of combined church and state that be, it’s that for the first time in history technology has caught up with greed and desire. The combined legacies of so many “leaders” have added up to one big modern orgy of infrastructure and control.

Democracy is politically spouted from all the virtual rooftops of the mass media, that exceedingly transparent controlled opposition of the old and new boss, as the CIA’s large-breasted bluebirds report and sing homage and fealty to that great system of political corruption. It is touted from the halls of legislature and parroted by the multitude of the unaware. And as it turns out, both main political parties are on board the same purposefully sinking ship, desperately and meticulously building a new Atlantis around their own dying model.

But do not be fooled, for this word Atlantis merely means fantasy, its synonyms being delusion, illusion, nightmare, apparition, chimera, mirage, a fool’s paradise, hallucination, fabrication, and of course the impossibility of a man-made utopia.

That only leaves a few things in opposition to such a false creation, and the antonyms to this word Atlantis are indeed simply truth, reality, certainty, actuality, and fact.

Now, the author realizes that the masses of goyim out there as the citizenships of the nations united in such an invention would rather support and live falsely in such a lie as this, a virtual matrix of pure delusion. I have no doubt that this will be the future of the majority. And so I am not here to try and prevent its dissemination as much as I am to document the tools of its creation. For we who will not take the marks and use the biometric identification and suffer the inoculations designed to rid us of our spirituality must be ever vigilant of such evils, such darkness posing as the light.

And so today we shall focus on what this author considers to be one of the most ridiculous customs and rituals that the common people participate in without having the slightest clue as to the origins and intent thereof. That is, of course, the private associations called as the political party system and its control over the electoral process.

But before we expose the communitarian, socialist agendas of both parties as that celebrated “democracy” in action, perhaps we should get a better grasp on the historical point of view of this word. So who likes and who opposes democracy?

–=–

DEMOCRATIC:

“Of or pertaining to democracy, or to a political party called “democratic,” particularly, in the United States, the Democratic party, which succeeded the Anti-federalist, or Republican, party.”

—Black’s Law 4th Edition

–=–

Dictatorship naturally arises out of democracy, and the most aggravated form of tyranny and slavery out of the most extreme liberty.”

—Plato

–=–

A pure democracy is generally a very bad government. It is often the most tyrannical government on earth; for a multitude is often rash, and will not hear reason.”

Noah Webster

–=–

“Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.”

—John Adams

–=–

“Democracy is indispensable to socialism.”

—Vladimir Ilyich Lenin

—=—

“Democracy is the road to socialism.”

Karl Marx

–=–

“To my mind, there is a solution which has to do with democracy, because democratic governments are subject to the will of the people. So, if the people will it, you can actually create international institutions through the democratic states.”

George Soros

–=–

“Democracy is only a dream: it should be put in the same category as Arcadia, Santa Claus, and Heaven.”

–H. L. Mencken

–=–

“The oppressed are allowed once every few years to decide which particular representatives of the oppressing class are to represent and repress them in parliament.”

—Vladimir Ilyich Lenin

—=—

“The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter.”

Winston Churchill

–=–

Our alliances should be understood as a means to expand our influence, not as a constraint on our power. The expansion of democracy and freedom in the world should be a shared interest and value with all nations.”

—Chuck Hagel, 24th United States Secretary of Defense under Obama, Chairperson of the President’s Intelligence Advisory Board

–=–

“Our country’s founders cherished liberty, not democracy.”

—Ron Paul

–=–

“I’ve always had a Marxist understanding of history: democracy is a result of a broad modernization process that happens in every country. Neocons think the use of political power can force the pace of change, but ultimately it depends on societies doing it themselves.”

—Francis Fukuyama

–=–

“Sometimes democracy must be bathed in blood.”

—Augusto Pinochet, president of Chile

–=–

“Democracy consists of choosing your dictators, after they’ve told you what you think it is you want to hear.”

—Alan Coren

–=–

“Democracy means government by discussion, but it is only effective if you can stop people talking.”

—Clement Attlee

–=–

“The flood of money that gushes into politics today is a pollution of democracy.”

—Theodore White

–=–

The President will lead in the treason. Your militia will leave you and fight against you… When evil men take office the whole gang will be in collusionThey will keep the people in utter ignorance and steal their liberty by ambuscade. When Government removes your armaments, you will have no power, but government will have all power.” 

—Patrick Henry

–=–

“The ignorance of one voter in a democracy impairs the security of all.”

—John F. Kennedy

–=–

“Democracy needs support, and the best support for democracy comes from other democracies.”

—Benazir Bhutto

–=–

Perhaps the greatest flaw in this concept of government in general, be it of kings or representatives, is the mistaken identity of its members. To assume the incorruptible nature of any man is the folly of all others. And in this lowest form of government called democracy, such an assumption would only lead to exactly what we see in government today. For behind the banner of democracy lies always the worst possible cheats, pirates, and thieves. And under that subjective banner lies only illiteracy and ignorance, the masses of they who actually vote for their tyrants while choosing to believe they are saviors.

To turn the entire world into individual democracies is the number one goal of the modern tyrant. For only in the ignorance of the masses may democracy may take hold, thrive, and destroy itself. From this subversion the tyrant thrives, the old system dies, and the new order begins. This rebirth process is well under way in most nations. And of course war will transpire in those whose people choose knowledge over the necessary ignorance of democratic public-mindedness, for war is merely the clearing of obstacles in a globally sanctioned international commerce of nations, utterly controlled by one united front ratified by those same tyrants promoting democracy now and central, globalist rule later.

–=–

“Democracy still has a real hope and chance in Iraq, and true freedom in this country would be the greatest testament to those who gave their lives for it.”

—Mary Landrieu

–=–

Nothing is more ridiculous than this political notion of killing millions and causing mass starvation, suffering, and destruction of infrastructure with only the somehow innocent and patriotically perceived design to spread freedom and democracy. This attitude that many millions or billions must die so that democracy can live is ludicrous at worse, paradoxical at best. But then, what else would one expect from these creators of a New Atlantis?

What really is this militarized, psychological warfare effort to spread democracy to the world? Why the need to cause democratic elections?

The answer is simple really… volunteerism, or at least the appearance of a voluntary society. You see, this term “volunteerism” goes by a different name in law, that being the doctrine of master and servant. When a commonality of people are all given “equality” to vote for their tyrants, the title of those tyrants is officially merely professed as legitimately elected “politicians.” Thus the voting process is the creator of mutualistic consent as mob rule. The minority assumes the majority will; the majority always being the most weak and susceptible to illusion and predictive programming. This is called as democracy, where a bunch of fools (a legal term meaning those not in right mind or in Latin non compos mentis) believe they each have a voice, when in reality their votes are counted as only one voice from one body. And those who choose not to decide between their tyrants in that democratic system of voting still have made a choice, that choice being assent to the majority will. It’s a no win situation, regardless of how we individually vote. For it is not the results of the vote that matter, only the volunteerism that causes legitimacy of the whole illusionary process. The act, not the result, is what makes tyrants become as legitimate in the minds of the masses.

Obviously both political parties and all third parties must include themselves in this democratic process. And so we can state with self-evident absoluteness that all parties must support democracy. The Lenin and Marx quotes above certainly help us to understand the origins and necessity of democracy as the gateway to all other systems, be they socialism, communism, or that great combination of all isms called and promoted as communitarianism. The reader would be shocked to learn that most “politicians” out there are grand supporters of this modern plan of communitarianism. And I invite the reader to research this on his or her own. A good source is here:

LINK–> http://web.archive.org/web/20080621055453/http://nord.twu.net/acl/evolution.html

Note: Please support Niki Raapana in her works. (http://nikiraapana.blogspot.com)

Now let us examine this collusion of the Republican National Party of the United States with the International Democrat Union (IDU), supporting so many other socialist and communitarian constructs around the world.

–=–

IDU Mission:

“Being committed to advancing the social and
political values on which democratic societies are founded,
including the basic personal freedoms and human rights,
as defined in the (UN) Universal Declaration of Human Rights….”

–IDU founding Declaration of Principles, second Paragraph

–=–

Yep. You read the title of this blog-post correctly. As it turns out, the political party game is one giant United Nations, Agenda 21 fraud.

Yes, the Republican Party of the United States is actually a member of the International Democrat Union (IDU), which above all else promotes the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights over the supposed sovereignty of the United States constitution – and over that of any other member party’s (nation’s) constitutional charter as well! This is essential for global governance.

In an article written by Tom Deweese (American Policy Center) and posted on the Gunowners of America website, the IDU is succinctly unveiled:

“The root of the IDU’s political agenda is Fabian Socialism which wants to blur national borders and cultures, eliminate private property and individual liberty in favor of the common good. The Fabians consider themselves to be a ruling elite that knows better than individuals how to run our lives. Their way is: Heads, government wins. Tails, citizens lose. It is the worst form of tyranny. And this is the root of the IDU, and by association, apparently the Republican Party. That answers a lot of questions about recent Republican policy decisions…”

Link–> http://gunowners.org/op0542.htm

–=–

As it is so very easy to confuse the intentions of these international bodies with that of individual peoples of sovereign states, we must make this very important distinction between the United Nations and the individual but no longer seperate Nations that subscribe to it.

From the American Policy Institute in 2009, again by Mr. Tom Deweese, we read:

New GOP Chairman should remove Party from the International Democrat Union…

“As an example of how this second system works in practice, The Constitution of the old Soviet Union said that Soviet citizens had most of the same rights as Americans. Except that it also said individual rights were secondary to the common good. In the case of the Soviet Union, the common good was defined as creating a worldwide communist utopia where individual wants and needs simply didn’t count. We all know how that worked out for the Soviet citizens.

While veiled in language designed to sound much like the Declaration of Independence, the UN’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights actually takes this second approach, outlining specific rights it says we should all have. It says nothing of “unalienable” rights, instead referring to “rights under the law.” Who or what is the law, according to the Human Rights Declaration? It says, “the will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government.” Now, at first look, that sounds like America. Democracy. People voting – the opposite of dictatorship. But such a concept ignores the very root of American freedom – that our rights are guaranteed, no matter what the majority thinks or wants. Moreover, Article 29, Section 3 of the Declaration says “These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.” So much for “unalienable” rights.”

LINK–> http://americanpolicy.org/2009/01/08/new-gop-chairman-should-remove-party-from-the-international-democrat-union-3/

–=–

Of course those unalienable rights spoken of in the declaration of independence had nothing to do with public 14th amendment citizens of the United States, but only actually protected those private men who reserved all rights from the United States. The American Policy Institute will never tell the common citizenship this of course (or simply does not know). Often the parrots of policy know nothing of the words they speak, led by the beak to support and make falsely patriotic what should be abandoned and utterly destroyed, such as the existence and purpose of these controlling and corrupting political parties.

We must learn to recognize the difference between blood and fiction, between man untainted by political, public status and he who avoids such marks, names, and numbers in privacy. Citizenship is, of course, an alienation upon privacy. Thus the United Nations and its declarations only apply to the public citizenships of each nation, which are only the common, registered goyim (general people) and the commercial laws pertaining to us. The private men of each private (several) State will not be subject to such national rule, for they are the creators of nations. Gods. A “State” is nothing more than a Private bloodline of “People.” And it is these tyrants that create the democratic nations and the law of nations for their own protection against that mass of illiterates we call nationally as the public. In short, the United Nations is the uniting in commerce and law of all slave colonies called as nations. Colony means only farm or plantation. And global governance will only apply to those born in the nations; those birthed and certified in attainder or legal “corruption of blood” under a commercial, legal system of alienation.

It is certainly true that those who falsely believe they are free are the most hopelessly enslaved. And democracy is certainly the best tool for the propagation of such a false dialectic.

In the history section of the about tab from the IDU.org website we read:

“The International Democrat Union (IDU) is a working association of over 80 Conservative, Christian Democrat and like-minded political parties of the centre and centre right.

Formed in 1983, the IDU provides a forum in which Parties holding similar beliefs can come together and exchange views on matters of policy and organisational interest, so that they can learn from each other, act together, establish contacts and speak with one strong voice to promote democracy and centre-right policies around the globe. FOUNDER MEMBERS of the IDU included Britain’s Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, then US Vice-President George Bush Sr, Paris Mayor and later President of France Jacques Chirac, German Chancellor Helmut Kohl and many other Party Leaders.

Our Mission

I. The International Democrat Union (IDU) shall consist of Member Parties of the Asia Pacific Democrat Union (APDU); the Caribbean Democrat Union (CDU); the Democrat Union of Africa; the European Democrat Union (EDU); the European People’s Party (EPP); the Alliance of European Conservatives and Reformists (AECR); and the Union of Latin American Parties (UPLA), which have adhered to the IDU Declaration of Principles.

II. The IDU will foster the common philosophy of its Member Parties, establish permanent relations at a bilateral and multilateral level, encourage mutual support and to these ends will provide a forum for the exchange of views and information on matters of interest to all or a considerable number of its Member Parties.

Countries can only develop their full potential if they develop recognising the ideals of liberal democracy, freedom of the individual, and the need for economic growth to be based on individual initiative and free, competitive enterprise economies. The IDU has a clear role in a modern world, where today’s idea in one country is tomorrow’s policy in another.

Through the IDU, member Parties can exchange policy ideas, assist each other to win the political argument, and to win elections. There are regular meetings of both the full IDU and its Regional Unions and Organisations. The officers of the IDU are elected at Party Leaders’ Meetings which are held every three or four years.

At IDU Executive Meetings, briefings are given on local and topical issues, as well as consideration given to applicant parties. Apart from Executive Meetings and meetings of IDU’s Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, the IDU holds events such as the Young Leaders Forum, plus undertakes fact-finding missions and election observation. A major event is also held every four years to coincide with the Republican Convention, the last one held in September 2012 in Tampa (Florida).

The IDU also organises campaigning seminars for politicians and party workers. These involve exchanges of information on campaign technology, fund-raising techniques, opinion polling, advertising and campaign organisation. The IDU plays an essential role in enabling like-minded, centre-right parties to share experiences in order to achieve electoral success.”

Under the history tab we read:

“19 dignitaries attended the meeting that established the IDU held at the Hotel Intercontinental n London on 24th June 1983: Dr Alois Mock (Osterreichische Volkspartei, Austria); Prime-Minister Margaret Thatcher (Conservative Party, Great Britain); Federal Chancellor Helmut Kohl (CDU, Federal Republic of Germany); Prime-Minister Franz-Josef Strauss (CSU, Federal Republic of Germany); M Jacques Chirac (Rassemblement Pour la Republique, France); Mr Andrew Peacock (Liberal Party, Australia); M Evangelos Averoff-Tossizza (Nea Demokratia, Greece); Sr Fraga Iribarne (Alianza Popular, Spain); Sr Oscar Alzaga, (Partido Democrata Popular, Spain); Mrs Susanne Wood, National Party, New Zealand); President Glafcos Clerides (Democratic Rally, Cyprus); Mr Ilkka Suominen (Kansallinen Kokoomus, Finland); Sr Lucas Pires (CDS, Portugal); Mr Tatsuo Tanaka (Liberal Democrat Party, Japan); Mr Ulf Adelsohn (Moderata Samlingspartiet, Sweden); Mr Erik Nielsen (Progressive Conservative Party, Canada); Prime-Minister Poul Schluter (Det Konservative Folkeparti, Denmark); Mr Jo Benkow (Hoyre, Norway); and Mr Frank Fahrenkopf (Republican National Committee, USA).

In addition the US Vice-President George Bush and Norwegian Prime-Minister Kare Willoch (IDU’s second Chairman, from 1987 to 1989) were present and both spoke at the founding meetingClick here for the minutes of the founding meeting and Declaration of Principles in PDF format.

The IDU officers elected were: Chairman: Dr Alois Mock (Osterreichische Volkspartei, Austria); Vice-Chairmen: Ulf Adelsohn (Moderata Samlingspartiet, Sweden); Richard Allen (Republican National Committee, USA); Jacques Chirac (Rassemblement Pour la Republique, France); Cecil Parkinson (Conservative Party, Great Britain); Sir John Atwill (Liberal Party, Australia); and Prime-Minister Franz-Josef Strauss (CSU, Federal Republic of Germany), in addition to Treasurer: Allan Lawrence (Progressive Conservative Party, Canada) and Executive Secretary: Scott Hamilton (Conservative Party, Great Britain).

–=–

That’s right folks, the self-labeled “Conservative” Republican Party of the United States has partnered with such other national political parties as the Liberal Democrat Party of Japan, the Liberal Party of Australia, the Democratic Rally of Cyprus, and who could forget those supposed tyrannical redcoats of the Conservative Party of Great Britain?

THE CHAIRMAN:

Thank you very much Mr Vice-President, and I am particularly grateful to you coming to London and conferring additional reputation to our meeting by your presence. May I now ask Mr Fahrenkopf to take the floor.”

MR FRANK FAHRENKDPF:

“>Chairman, Republican National CommitteeU.S.A .]

“Mr Chairman, my colleagues, it is with a great deal of pride and pleasure that I as Chairman of the Republican Party of the United States join Vice-President Bush in commemorating the historic creation of IDU here in London today.

A year and a half ago I attended an EDU meeting in Munichat which the seed of the Pacific Democrat Union and the International Democrat Union was sown. Last July, in Tokyo, the PDU was formed; and last week, in Honolulu, I had the great pleasure to host the PDU’s first annual council meeting. Today, we reap the remaining harvest of that Munich meeting with the birth of the IDUOn behalf of the Republican Partylet me assure my colleagues of our full cooperation and participation in the IDU – and in seeking our mutual goals of promoting democracy, freedom, self-determination and, most important, peace in the world.”

THE CHAIRMAN:

Thank you Mr Fahrenkopf.

May I now ask the Norwegian Prime-Minister to take the floor.”

—Minutes of the IDU founding meeting and Declaration of Principles

–=–

Even as the Pope calls for the same system of worldwide “peace and safety” through United Nations programs and one world religion, we are warned repeatedly that these artful terms are merely the lies of tyrants.

–=–

For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape… 

1 Thessalonians 5:3 KJB

–=–

And in the latter time of their kingdom, when the transgressors are come to the full, a king of fierce countenance, and understanding dark sentences, shall stand up. And his power shall be mighty, but not by his own power: and he shall destroy wonderfully, and shall prosper, and practise, and shall destroy the mighty and the holy people. And through his policy also he shall cause craft to prosper in his hand; and he shall magnify himself in his heart, and by peace shall destroy many: he shall also stand up against the Prince of princes; but he shall be broken without hand.”

—Daniel 8: 23-25, KJB

–=–

“Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.”

—Mathew 7: 15, KJB

—=—

“Now, it is true that the nature of society is to create, among its citizens, an illusion of safety; but it is also absolutely true that the safety is always necessarily an illusion. Artists are here to disturb the peace.”

—James Baldwin, ‘An interview with James Baldwin’ (1961)

—=—

“As distrust, in some sense, is the mother of safety, so security is the gate of danger. A man had need to fear this most of all, that he fears not at all.”

—Thomas Brooks, citation in Josiah Hotchkiss Gilbert’s, ‘Dictionary of Burning Words of Brilliant Writers,’ p. 532 (1895).

—=—

20 bucks says the reader has no idea what the word “danger” means in its etymology.

–=–

DANGERnoun – mid-13c., “power of a lord or master, jurisdiction,” from Anglo-French daunger, Old French dangier “power, power to harm, mastery, authority, control” (12c., Modern French danger), alteration (due to assoc. with damnum) of dongier, from Vulgar Latin *dominarium “power of a lord,” from Latin dominuslord, master” (see domain). Modern sense of “risk, peril” (from being in the control of someone or something else) evolved first in French and was in English late 14c. Replaced Old English pleoh; in early Middle English this sense is found in peril.

LINK–>http://etymonline.com/index.php?allowed_in_frame=0&search=danger

–=–

The United States, the nation, is the creation of a danger, also called as a district. And citizen-ships are of course on a commercial voyage in peril, requiring licensure and insurance on their surname. This scratch of the surface will be expounded upon intricately in my upcoming book, a private work currently in editing and due out very soon, free to all who seek such forbidden knowledge.

It is strange that no one seems to question the fact that Abraham Lincoln, as he who caused what can only be compared to the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia that killed so many millions, was the first Republican party president. And suddenly, a civil war? Suddenly, the first tyrannical executive order against brother and sister, mother and father. Suddenly, lawlessness according to the law of necessity in war. Suddenly, reconstruction of the constitution and government, including the 14th amendment that enslaved all commoners under a slave-state based on equality, but never equity?

No one seems to question that the later and 2nd president Roosevelt, whom days after his election caused congress to declare his and all future president’s virtual dictatorship through permanent national emergency status, was of this Democratic platform, though his previous presidential namesake was certainly of that “Grand Old Party.”  For those unfamiliar with these histories of the American presidency and the dictatorship spoken of, please see my articles entitled “Cracking The Cult Of The Constitution,” parts 1 & 2, or Volume II of my upcoming book series.

“Two distantly related branches of the family from Oyster Bay on Long Island and Hyde Park in Dutchess CountyUpstate New York achieved national political prominence with the elections of (republican) Presidents Theodore Roosevelt (1901–1909) and his fifth cousin (democratFranklin Delano Roosevelt (1933–1945), whose wife, First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt, was Theodore’s niece.”

–Wikipedia entry for Roosevelt family

–=–

But where exactly does this leave us as compared to the already so-named competition?What about the other United States “Democratic” Party?

–=–

“Note that the Political Party today known as the “Democratic Party” was
initially established as theRepublican Party.” The Jeffersonian party
members were labeled “Democratic” by opposition Federalists –
an attempt to stigmatize them as purveyors of democracy or mob rule.
By the Jacksonian era, the term “The Democracy” was in use by the party;
the name “Democratic Party” was eventually settled upon and
became the official name in 1844.”

–Thomas Jefferson, by Joyce Appleby, Encyclopedia Britannica

–=–

One would be hard-pressed to describe the National Democratic Party of America as anything but a promoter of it’s own brand of the similitude of neoliberal, communitarian socialism promoted by its mainstream counterpart. And certainly the antics of this current president need to be discussed as to their source.

For instance, the Chicago Democratic Socialists of America stated in true communitarian spirit the following in its report entitled “New Ground 45” in 1996:

March – April, 1996

A Town Meeting on Economic Insecurity: Employment and Survival in Urban America

By Bob Roman

Over three hundred people attended the first of two Town Meetings on Economic Insecurity on February 25 in Ida Noyes Hall at the University of Chicago. Entitled “Employment and Survival in Urban America,” the meeting was sponsored by the UofC DSA Youth Section, Chicago DSA and University Democrats. The panelists were Toni Preckwinkle, Alderman of Chicago’s 4th Ward; Barack Obama, candidate for the 13th Illinois Senate District; Professor William Julius Wilson, Center for the Study of Urban Inequality at the University of Chicago; Professor Michael Dawson, University of Chicago; and Professor Joseph Schwartz, Temple University and a member of DSA’s National Political Committee…

One of the themes that has emerged in Barack Obama’s campaign iswhat does it take to create productive communities,” not just consumptive communities. It is an issue that joins some of the best instincts of the conservatives with the better instincts of the left. He felt the state government has three constructive roles to play.

The first ishuman capital development.” By this he meant public education (think Common Core), welfare reform (Think Obama-Care), and a “workforce preparation strategy” (more Common Core). Public education requires equality in funding. It’s not that money is the only solution to public education’s problems but it’s a start toward a solution. The current proposals for welfare reform are intended to eliminate welfare but it’s also true that the status quo is not tenable. A true welfare system would provide for medical care, child care and job training (i.e. Common Core and Obama-care). While Barack Obama did not use this term, it sounded very much like the “social wage” approach used by many social democratic labor parties. By “workforce preparation strategy,” Barack Obama simply meant a coordinated, purposeful program of job training instead of the ad hoc, fragmented approach used by the State of Illinois today.

The state government can also play a role in (wealth) redistribution, the allocation of wages and jobs. As Barack Obama noted, when someone gets paid $10 million to eliminate 4,000 jobs, the voters in his district know this is an issue of power not economics. The government can use as tools labor law reform, public works and contracts

Link–> http://www.chicagodsa.org/ngarchive/ng45.html

–=–

Not only was Barack Obama an honored attendee and speaker for the socialist party of Chicago, in September 1995 he was a contracted publicist for the Marxist “New Party”.

“About 50 activists attended the Chicago New Party membership meeting in July. The purpose of the meeting was to update members on local activities and to hear appeals for NP support from four potential political candidates. The NP is being very active in organization building and politics. There are 300 members in Chicago. In order to build an organizational and financial base the NP is sponsoring house parties. Locally it has been successful both fiscally and in building a grassroots base. Nationwide it has resulted in 1000 people committed to monthly contributions. The NP’s political strategy is to support progressive candidates in elections only if they have a concrete chance to “win”. This has resulted in a winning ratio of 77 of 110 elections. Candidates must be approved via a NP political committee. Once approved, CANDIDATES MUST SIGN A CONTRACT WITH THE NP. The contract mandates that THEY MUST HAVE A VISIBLE AND ACTIVE RELATIONSHIP WITH THE NP.

The political entourage included Alderman Michael Chandler, William Delgado, chief of staff for State Rep Miguel del Valle, and spokespersons for State Sen. Alice Palmer, Sonya Sanchez, chief of staff for State Sen. Jesse Garcia, who is running for State Rep in Garcia’s District; and Barack Obama…”

Link–> http://www.chicagodsa.org/ngarchive/ng42.ht

–=–

Perhaps the most amazing cognitive disassociation and dissonance of the American people is the fact that “democracy” and the spread of it actually means that the people do not elect their own president/head of state.

The member nations/states of the International Democrat Union, including the United States, are almost exclusively nations/states where the president/head of state is elected through parliament or electoral college. In other words, in most of these “democratic” nations/states, the head of state is an INDIRECT ELECTION, NOT BY THE COMMON, VOTING PEOPLE.

For instance, the following nations have indirect elections for president, either as a monarchy, by election of legislature or by electoral college, orby some other committee or parliament, as opposed to that supposedly communist China, where the common people actually directly vote for their president:

Albania
Australia
Belgium –
Canada
Peoples Republic of China –
Denmark
Estonia
Ethiopia –
Germany
Greece
Hong Kong –
Hungary
India –
Iraq –
Israel –
Italy –
Jamaica –
Japan –
Kosovo –
Kuwait –
Lous –
Lebenon –
Libya –
Luxemburg –
Morocco –
Nepal –
Netherlands –
New Zealand
Norway
Pakistan –
Saudi Arabia –
South Africa –
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland –
Syria –
Thailand –
United Arab Emirates –
United Kingdom
United States
Vatican City –

Complete list here –> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elections_by_country

–=–

In contrast, when we view the nations or states that do have direct elections, with few exceptions they are generally considered as “third world” counties. It is not that they are, just that the self-proclaimed first-worlders call them as such. Ireland and Iran for instance hold direct elections, two very isolationist countries that do not cooperate with the monarchical or electoral systems and wish to preserve their culture and religious heritage. The same cannot be said of America, a people that seem to have no idea that their vote is purely a political pole, a popularity contest, and not the actual vote for a president. We do not vote for the best man, only for the best fictional party member, 1984 style.

I have presented here many threads to follow for the reader. At the time of this posting the IDU.org website is conveniently and temporarily not in service. And so I hope this collection of information will be a foundation for your own future research and sharing with others so brainwashed by this illegitimate system.

Will it stop you from voting? Who cares? The result is always the same with or without your individual vote, and not enough common goyim will see this to matter. I speak now only to the remnant, to those desiring to be unenfranchised from their false, political freedom.

DOM – Used as a termination, denotes jurisdiction, or property and jurisdiction; primarily, doom, judgment; as in kingdom, earldom. Hence it is used to denote state, condition or quality, as in wisdom, freedom. (Webster’s 1828)

FREEnoun –  [Hebrew. See Frank.] 1. Being at liberty; not being under necessity or restraint, physical or moral; a word of general application to the body, the will or mind, and to corporations. 2. In government, not enslaved; not in a state of vassalage or dependence; subject only to fixed laws, made by consent, and to a regular administration of such laws; not subject to the arbitrary will of a sovereign or lord; as a free state, nation or people. 3. Instituted by a free people, or by consent or choice of those who are to be subjects, and securing private rights and privileges by fixed laws and principles; not arbitrary or despotic; as a free constitution or government. There can be no free government without a democratical branch in the constitution. 4. Not imprisoned, confined or under arrest; as, the prisoner is set free. 5. Unconstrained; unrestrained; not under compulsion or control. A man is free to pursue his own choice; he enjoys free will. 6. Permitted; allowed; open; not appropriated; as, places of honor and confidence are free to all; we seldom hear of a commerce perfectly free. (Webs1828)

FREEDOMnoun – 1. A state of exemption from the power or control of another; liberty; exemption from slavery, servitude or confinement. Freedom is personal, civil, political, and religious. [See Liberty.] 2. Particular privileges; franchise; immunity; as the freedom of a city. 3. Power of enjoying franchises. 4. Exemption from fate, necessity, or any constraint in consequence of predetermination or otherwise; as the freedom of the will. 5. Any exemption from constraint or control. 6. Ease or facility of doing any thing. He speaks or acts with freedom. 7. Frankness; boldness. He addressed his audience with freedom. 8. License; improper familiarity; violation of the rules of decorum; with a plural. Beware of what are called innocent freedoms. (Webster’s 1828)

FREEDOMLiberty; the right to do what is not forbidden by law. Freedom does not preclude the idea of subjection to law; indeed, it presupposes the existence of some legislative provision, the observance of which insures freedom to us, by securing the like observance from others. (Bouvier’s 1856)

ENFRANCHISETo make free; to incorporate a man in a society or body politic.(Black’s 4th)

ENFRANCHISEMENTThe act of making free; giving a franchise or freedom to; investiture with privileges or capacities of freedom, or municipal or political liberty. Admission to the freedom of a city; admission to political rights, and particularly the right of suffrage. Anciently, the acquisition of freedom by a villein from his lord. The word is now used principally either of the manumission of slaves, of giving to a borough or other constituency a right to return a member or members to parliament, or of the conversion of copyhold into freehold. (Black’s 4th)

ENFRANCHISEMENT nounRelease from slavery or custody. 1. The admission of persons to the freedom of a corporation or state; investiture with the privileges of free citizens; the incorporating of a person into any society or body politic. (Webs1828)

–=–

“In a popular sense, the political rights of subjects and citizens are franchises, such as the right of suffrage.”

–Black’s Law 2nd Edition, definition of franchise

–=–

This idea of liberty and freedom is taken so completely out of context to the average “citizenship” in public-mindedness that the notion that we live in a voluntary society where servants choose their masters as the doctrines of law is completely lost. We do not realize that it is our own unrestrained freedoms (liberties) as franchises of the state that actually cause us to be slaves to it. For a citizen-ship is like a rental care, a legal status that is bound to all legal laws of persons. And so the freedom (franchise) enjoyed, including the right to suffer from our own choices, also called suffrage or voting, is the very nature of the slavery system called politically (artificially) as liberty. Yet again, we are taking what is false, what is created only in the Atlantean jurisdiction, and pretending it to be a reality.

And so if one and only one thing is learned by the reader of this article it must be this: that the powers that be exist and subsist only because we suffer (vote) for them to do just that. In other words, we can only blame ourselves for voting for the better of two evils. No one is forcing our hand. No one is forcing our participation in the franchise of citizenship. We put ourselves into the path and ad-venture of the danger of another. We consent through our actions and inaction, and by doing so allow the worst of the worst element of the human equation to cheat, steal, and pirate everything we need even while it allows us the franchise to use what we want. After all, we voted for everything we complain about and deserve everything we are handed. Until we admit defeat, we cannot and will not find natural freedom, only the false appearance of nature as a political art from called franchise.

In the end, which is by the way right now, we need not fear the threat of globalism for it is already here. To fear deceit when it is already upon us is foolishness. Fear of it is truly irrelevant at this stage of a very ancient game of pledging. The only consideration we must individually make is wether to participate in it or not, whether to voluntarily carry its enfranchised mark, surname, and number or not, and ultimately whether we are willing to be persecuted, imprisoned, and killed for daring to have, and more importantly act upon, the Highest knowledge of self-evident Truth.

Remember, you are voting for a party, not a man. The party has no power without the person you vote (or don’t vote) for and thus give legitimacy to. Whether we give willingly our choice or refrain and offer no choice at all, either action is an expression of consent. Not tacit, expressive.

We must choose our Master. Reality or Atlantis. It’s that simple.

Until then, enjoy the big legal lie…

.

–Clint Richardson (Realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Thursday, April 28th, 2016

Crash: Why America Will Fall Under Its Own Shadow


As a deep researcher into what is jokingly called the economy, I am getting real tired of “economists” and their dyer warnings of eminent monetary failure and thus the collapse of the so-called U.S. “economy.” I am not an economist. In truth, anyone who claims to be one is quite frankly full of shit.

So why did I title this rant as such?

First of all, let’s dispel the fallacy that the United States needs currency to rule. The United States is a military dictatorship, a fact that I will be proving beyond any doubt in my upcoming documentary film in 2015, God willing. It is ridiculous to then consider that the United States is propped up merely by money, especially when it creates that money magically through appropriation without providing new collateral. In reality, the fiat currency is nothing more or less than debt. It is promises to pay that will never be paid, for no debt can ever be paid with debt. The United States is a bankrupt corporation, as James Trafficant stated in congressional record, and a bankrupt cannot create anything but more debt.

As stupid humans, we are trained and conditioned to believe that the dollar represents something tangible with a somehow intrinsic value. I assure you it does not. But if my word isn’t good enough for you in all of your religious fervent belief and faith for said notes of mammon, let’s hear straight from the horses mouth.

The Federal Reserve, in its publication Modern Money Mechanics, states the following:

While currency is used for a great variety of small transactions, most of the dollar amount of money payments in our economy are made by check or by electronic transfer between deposit accounts. Moreover, currency is a relatively small part of the money stock.

In the United States neither paper currency nor deposits have value as commodities. Intrinsically, a dollar bill is just a piece of paper, deposits merely book entries. Coins do have some intrinsic value as metal, but generally far less than their face value.

What, then, makes these instruments – checks, paper money, and coins – acceptable at face value in payment of all debts and for other monetary uses? Mainly, it is the confidence people have that they will be able to exchange such money for other financial assets and for real goods and services whenever they choose to do so.

Who Creates Money?

Changes in the quantity of money may originate with actions of the Federal Reserve System (the central bank), depository institutions (principally commercial banks), or the public. The major control, however, rests with the central bank.

The actual process of money creation takes place primarily in banks.’ As noted earlier, checkable liabilities of banks are money. These liabilities are customers’ accounts. They increase when customers deposit currency and checks and when the proceeds of loans made by the banks are credited to borrowers’ accounts.

In the absence of legal reserve requirements, banks can build up deposits by increasing loans and investments so long as they keep enough currency on hand to redeem whatever amounts the holders of deposits want to convert into currency. This unique attribute of the banking business was discovered many centuries ago.

It started with goldsmiths. As early bankers, they initially provided safekeeping services, making a profit from vault storage fees for gold and coins deposited with them. People would redeem their “deposit receipts” whenever they needed gold or coins to purchase something, and physically take the gold or coins to the seller who, in turn, would deposit them for safekeeping, often with the same banker. Everyone soon found that it was a lot easier simply to use the deposit receipts directly as a means of payment. These receipts, which became known as notes, were acceptable as money since whoever held them could go to the banker and exchange them for metallic money.

Then, bankers discovered that they could make loans merely by giving their promises to pay, or bank notes, to borrowers. In this way, banks began to create money. More notes could be issued than the gold and coin on hand because only a portion of the notes outstanding would be presented for payment at any one time. Enough metallic money had to be kept on hand, of course, to redeem whatever volume of notes was presented for payment.

Transaction deposits are the modem counterpart of bank notes. It was a small step from printing notes to making book entries crediting deposits of borrowers, which the borrowers in turn could “spend” by writing checks, thereby “printing” their own money.”

–=–

Can you see past the illusion?

Do you see that the so-called debt doesn’t actually represent anything at all in reality?

Do you understand that debt is the basis of all religion, and that your belief and fear in it is all that substantiates it?

When this system of monetized fakery was created, its goal was not to create wealth. For money is not wealth, it is the opposite of wealth. It is debt. It must be traded in exchange for wealth to fools. If an entire nation and planet of people can be made to believe that this debt is actually a credit, then the debt can be traded for actual wealth. In other words, an entire people can somehow be made to believe that everything in reality can be traded for merely a promise to pay, and that this promise to pay is the same as the payment itself.

As Whimpy perpetually says, we will be paid Tuesday for a hamburger today… but Tuesday never comes.

As I have shown in triplicate, government has done just that. It has created the currency, traded it for corporate stocks, foreign currencies, real estate, precious metals, and anything else representative of real wealth to the point that, as Walter Burien claims via the Comprehensive Annual Financial Reporting (CAFR) system of government accounting: “Government owns it all through investment.”

–=–
Why America Is No Longer Needed
–=–

Rome is not stationary. It’s empire extends to every corner of the globe, and its center continuously relocates itself. Its name changes as its fraud is re-discovered, re-establishing itself as the need arises. And this is when the crash comes – the revolutions of past empires.

But revolution means to revolve back to the beginning; to start over again. Same empire, different name. This is why so many movies and other media is predictively programming us to support such revolutionary dissonance. Our ideas are very seldom our own, and obviously neither are our ideals of morals and values. Entertainment enters and holds our minds in whatever political thought processes the military ruler wishes to bore into its subjects. As a former Hollywood sound guy, I have seen the script-changes ensuring favorable praise and pro-government propaganda first hand, to the chagrin of writers that are paid more “money” to cooperate or else get their projects shelved.

In other words, we literally sell our souls for debt. We worship it. We trade assets for promises to pay. And we even hoard the debt notes in the illusion of security, as if debt equals safety. Unfortunately, our unreasonable belief and faith in this debt money (the devil’s currency) has lead us to covet the very thing that is killing us slowly. We therefore defend these promises to pay even to the point of war and violent oppression of the entire planet, giving blind and unwavering support to our dictators in congress and in the militarized Executive branch to kill in our (the people’s) name for the protection of our own disease of debt in its world domination.

But things are about to change…

The world is completely taken over. Almost every sense of resistance to the United Nations and what is deemed the “New World Order” by every president in recent memory has been squelched and replaced with “friendly” regimes. It is now common practice for the United States to arm both sides of every conflict while training “peace-keepers” to take over when the U.S. military withdraws from its illegal occupation in undeclared war, usually via Executive Order or other Executive (forceful) violence.

The fall of Iran seems to be the last great international challenge. Iran stands as the last hold out. And it is more demonized with every passing day.

Russia, China, and other imaginary enemies fill up the interim, but don’t be fooled. Government investments in China are why China is any power at all. And Russia wasn’t just allowed to build up its infrastructure because the United States was asleep. U.S. bases are in every state and in every nation around the world. These are not peaceful settlements, they are military occupations. No money is needed. It is rule by force, not by economics!

But with all of this military might, how is it that the U.S. will “crash?”

In the art of war, the assassin must be killed once its job is done. The United States has all but served its purpose. It has assassinated all resistance. It’s culture (which is a lack of established culture and moral law) has been infused with most other nations. Its fake currency has bought up the world “economy,” and that wealth can easily be transferred out to the world bank, leaving the people of America hopelessly destitute. With trained peace-keepers keeping the violent peace under United Nations’ purview, the centralization of military power can now be unilaterally acquired by the U.N. The United States as a mere member state of the United Nations can and is being equalized with all others.

The necessary symbolic crash of the United States central bank and currency is absolutely a requirement for global governance, where all nations are equal as the states of this United States are pretended to be. The centralized power as military force of the United States must be dismantled for the Roman phoenix to rise in its new form of global governance. And the only way to accomplish such a seemingly impossible feat is to play the only card left in the deck – the illusion of economic collapse through the “crash” of the fake currency.

Only if the people believe in that currency as real and intrinsic can this be accomplished, just as the Federal Reserve reports above.

Why is the mainstream news now sound-biting the horrors of the Fed and propagandizing the notion of “End The Fed” as a rallying cry? Does that really make sense considering that government is the majority stock-holder of all media agencies and stocks them with Operation Mockingbird parrots of the CIA, even while it saber-raddles for the destruction of Iran? Why is the totally controlled news constantly injecting fear-porn into the general public about the eminent financial crash of America? Why is it selling gold and storable food while continuously warning about earthquakes, economic upheaval, world war, and emergency preparedness?

The answers should be obvious.

The United States has done its job; its drugged, dumbed-down population used as cannon fodder as paid mercenaries for the military corporation. The borders are open. It’s business globalized. It’s independence subverted.

The shadow of America is the corporation 10 miles square called the United States corporation. And the 50 individual states that we romantically call “America” have fallen prey to their own so-called central government, where the ten planks of the Communist Manifesto are indeed the verifiable written law. The shadow of forced unionization has destroyed an unwitting people that have no idea they are proclaimed as enemies of their own central foreign state, that their shadow military occupies each of the 50 states under Leiber Code statutes, and most importantly that their currency is and always has been nothing but debt obligation and enslavement – the land of the free subjects; a cruel joke played out through an un-winnable game of monopoly at gunpoint.

The reality is that the national debt (a negative) can be abolished and jubilee’d tomorrow with the swipe of a presidential or congressional pen. It doesn’t exist in nature. It is born and will die on legal paper. But its power of illusion is so strong that the fiction of government and its fake money will cause reality to crumble right along with it. The gambling house called the stock market may crash into obscurity, but the ownership in international corporations will remain as the real wealth is transferred away. For a stock’s value is meaningless because what it is valued in is worthless debt in the form of promises to pay. It is the ownership that is important, representing controlling stake in all corporations despite what debt currency it is monetized and valued in. For all currencies are merely debt.

There are no banks left, for there is no lawful (real) money left to be banked. Deposit institutions are not banks, they are debt brokers. If you don’t understand this, then go try and deposit a gold bar or coin into “Wells Fargo Bank” or “Bank of America” – banks in name only. You cannot. No reality allowed. You can only rent a box to safely deposit your tangible property and hope it isn’t confiscated like in the last so-called “banking emergency.” Checking accounts only house promises to pay and nothing else.

The shadow government is killing its creator.

And belief in its own declared, de facto, prima facie evidence of legitimacy is all it will take to deliver the final blow.

It will be our own sons and daughters as career mercenaries that will be our own peace-keepers at home. Their uni-forms already bear the United Nations regalia and patch-mark.

.

–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Sunday, December 21th, 2014

133 Nations Join Against United States Government


I felt that this was worth repeating…

The Hegelian dialectic is alive and at play here. Notice the heavy Agenda 21 language here referring to Sustainable Development and the stripping of wealth from Americans. Of course, the thought that 133 nations around the world are plotting against the United States and calling it the center of the New World Order should be alarming in and of itself. It certainly is not an untrue accusation by any means. But this does, or at least should, mean that the United States can absolutely not participate in the United Nations any longer. To do so would literally and absolutely be treason.

But when playing the dialectic, these little nuances go unnoticed as the people do nothing, because the end game is as it always has been, a new WORLD order through the United Nations, with the United States as merely a member in a larger nation called the United Nations…

…under an international banking system called the World Bank (http://www.worldbank.org/),

…under the mark of the U.N. World Social Security program called the International Social Security Association (ISSA) (http://www.issa.int/),

…stemming from the International Labour Organization (ILO) (http://www.ilo.org/global/about-the-ilo/lang–en/index.htm),

…overseen and improved by the World Congress (https://www.safety2014germany.com/),

…with the General Assembly forcing Obamacare for the entire marked world population (http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2012/12/12/united-nations-universal-healthcare/),

…and so on and so forth.

This is a repost from “Whiteout Press” – link – http://www.whiteoutpress.com/articles/2014/q2/133-g77-nations-vow-destroy-americas-new-world-order/

UPDATE: Germany just signed on, making the count 134!!!

–=–

June 17, 2014

133 G77 Nations vow to destroy America’s New World Order

 

June 17, 2014. Bolivia. The American and European media are doing everything they can to black this news out. But it’s not going to stay a secret for long. As of this weekend, there’s a new New World Order on Earth and its enemy is the United States, the EU, the UN Security Council and the world’s shadow government led by the IMF and WTO. This new alliance of poor countries wouldn’t be much of a threat, except it includes two-thirds of the world’s nations including China and India.

–=–

UN Sec. Gen. Ban Ki-moon (center) with host country
Bolivia’s President Evo Morales and 133 other world leaders
this weekend. Image courtesy of the UN.

–=–

It’s a sad day for the American people when their government and state-sponsored news industry blacks out such an important news story. Americans actually have to rely on outlets like the Havana Times in Cuba, The Times of India, and United Nations press releases. There’s a reason this news is being censored across the West. And it’s only the latest global news story over the past two weeks on this subject blacked out from the American people.  Read on to find out why.

End of the New World Order

When the richest and most powerful nations on Earth formed the G7, G8, G20 and the like, they united to combine their dominance over the remaining 175 countries that make up humanity. And for decades, the wealthiest 20 countries led by the US have gotten exponentially more wealthy at the expense of the poorest 175 nations, who in turn have gotten even poorer. That’s been the result of the West’s ‘New World Order’, led mainly by self-appointed global governments like the International Monetary Fund and the World Trade Organization.

133 of those 175 countries have had enough of the New World Order’s rigged global financial system based in New York and London. They’ve seen their economies destroyed by corrupt corporations and global governments that create a cycle of never-ending dependence and poverty.  They’ve seen their nations’ vast resources stolen by multinational corporations. Their agriculture landscape has been poisoned. Their citizens bankrupted by the IMF and Wall Street. And their democratically elected leaders overthrown by foreign agents from countries like the US.

They’ve had enough of the New World Order. And an alliance of 133 countries, two-thirds of the nations on Earth, signed an agreement this weekend to end the West’s New World Order and replace it with a fair, honest and legitimate World Order – one that lets everyone participate and benefit, not just the super rich.

The Next World Order

The organization is officially called the ‘Group of 77 and China’, but the alliance actually includes 133 nations. Showing just how much influence they have, their meeting this weekend in Bolivia was opened with a keynote speech by United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon. In the audience were over 30 heads of state from around the world and official representatives from over 100 more governments. Also illustrating the organization’s growing influence, China isn’t even a member of the G77, but insisted on participating anyway in a show of unity with the globe’s Next World Order.

Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro participated, telling the gathered nations they had to unite to, “fight for fair and sustainable economic growth and for a new world economic order.” Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa went one step further, telling the gathered national leaders and representatives, “Only when we are united across Latin America and united around the world will we be able to make our voice heard and change an international order that is not just unfair, it is immoral.”

A report from AFP on Yahoo News, about the only report found in Western media, describes how Cuban President Raul Castro also participated, but reserved his comments for a call to help their top ally Venezuela. Cuba, Venezuela, Bolivia and a number of South American countries have insisted they are currently under attack by the United States and the CIA, who they insist are desperately trying to orchestrate coups to overthrow their democratically elected, pro-socialist governments the same way they are accused of doing in the Ukraine recently.

Iran and the UN

An announcement published by the United Nations this weekend touts UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon’s enthusiastic participation in the G77 meeting. It discusses how important this massive alliance is to the goals of the UN, particularly with regard to reversing the world’s growing economic inequality among nations. Moon and the UN are also sponsoring a separate but related meeting of nations in September to draft new climate resolutions to be enacted in 2015.

The announcement describes a private meeting between the UN Secretary General and Iran’s Vice President, ‘On the margins of today’s summit, Mr. Ban met with the First Vice President of Iran, Eshaq Jahangiri, to discuss development issues, as well as the potential role that Iran could play in restoring stability in Iraq and Syria. The Secretary-General added that he looked forward to Iran’s positive involvement on climate change and said he very much hoped that President Hassan Rouhani would attend the climate summit this September.’ The report also says the two leaders discussed Iran’s nuclear ambitions and the coming July deadline for compliance with past mandates.

Threats of America’s “second Vietnam”

Many of the government leaders in attendance took the opportunity to strike a blow against what they consider to be the biggest enemy of world peace, democracy and economic freedom – the United States. One leader even went as far as calling out President Obama by name and threatening the United States with a second Vietnam.

As reported by the Times of India, the G77 conference’s host this weekend – Bolivian President Evo Morales – threatened the United States and the American President telling the gathered heads of state, “If Mr. Obama keeps assailing the people of Venezuela, I am convinced that, faced with provocation and aggression, Venezuela and Latin America will be a second Vietnam for the United States. Let us defend democracy, natural resources, our sovereignty and our dignity.”

Cuba’s President Raul Castro was possibly the most pointed and focused in his remarks regarding the agenda of the participating countries. As reported by the Havana Times, Castro told the alliance of 133 nations, “It is necessary to demand a new international financial and monetary order and fair commercial conditions for producers and importers from the guardians of capital, centered in the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, and from the defenders of neoliberalism grouped in the World Trade Organization, which are attempting to divide us. Only unity will allow us to make our ample majority prevail.”

UN Civil War – dissolving the UN Security Council

One of the more ambitious goals of the G77 and its 133 participating countries is the elimination of the United Nations Security Council. World leaders insist it is little more than a five-nation tyranny over the full UN body. With five permanent members of the UN Security Council having veto power over the rest, UN policies and actions have been dictated by those five countries – US, UK, Russia, France and China. Members of the G77 want the Security Council eliminated so the UN can go back to being a purely democratic body.

The Cuban leader went on to describe a global economic system run by American hypocrisy and financial corruption, “The principles of International Law and the postulates of the New International Economic Order are brazenly violated, concepts that attempt to legalize meddling are imposed, force is used and threats of force are made with impunity, the media are used to promote division.”

Dominoes beginning to fall

This is just the latest organized attack on a global financial system rigged by corrupt governments and the multinational corporations that control them. Just last month, Russia and China signed a long term trade alliance that represents the first major crack in the US Dollar bubble. The two countries agreed to stop using US Dollars in their transactions and instead use their own two currencies. The two largest banks from both countries immediately announced they would be dumping the US Dollar as well.

On top of that, the world’s ‘BRIC’ countries – Brazil, Russia, India and China – have publicly declared their goal of replacing the corrupted US Dollar with some other global default currency. Now that Russia and China have finally taken actual steps to do that, the remaining two-thirds of the world will most likely begin making preparations to stop using the US Dollar as well. It was only this weekend that 133 of them pledged to do just that.

The scary part for Americans is that both Washington and Wall Street have promised this would never happen, because if it did, it would destroy the US economic system and possibly the US itself. Read the Whiteout Press article, ‘Russia-China Deals move US Dollar closer to Collapse’ for more information.

To view a full list of the 133 nations that make up the G77, visit the Group of 77 website.

–=–

If this doesn’t wake people up, I don’t know what will!!!

The question is, do the 133 nations blame the government…. or the people?

.

–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Sunday, July 27th, 2014

A Pictorial History Of The World’s Governments


Due to the overwhelming popularity of A Pictorial History Of The United States Government (LINK) I thought it prudent to present a pictorial and historical escapade into the infection of the rest of the world by this tiny but powerful bloodline minority. For until we can see, all of our cultures and heritages shall continue to be perverted and uniformly eroded as planned and foretold for centuries.

Please note that this more advanced essay is an integral part to the comprehension of my upcoming multi-part series on the founding of the United States and its Constitution – the Masonic origins of America – and why the fervent desire to build and support Israel (Zionsim) at all costs is so prevalent in our collective set of world leaders. Today’s presentation includes photos, quotes, and my own commentary to help put the puzzle pieces of the past together in their proper historical perspective so as to understand the collective disposition of the unorganized masses of people of the world under this unified international foe.

In the end, after weeks of careful assembly, you will certainly realize an undeniable and inconvenient truth about our world, who promotes war and pestilence for profit, and what controls most nations.

This time from A to Z: 100 pictures are indeed worth 10,000 words…

–=–

File:WJC meeting with Argentine President Cristina Kirchner.jpg
Argentina – World Jewish Congress leaders meet with Argentine
President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner in Buenos Aires, June 2008


Australia – Prime Minister Julia Gillard


President Heydar Alyev


Belgium – Prime Minister Yves Leterme
receives a compass called the ‘Navigator of Jerusalem’,
from European Jewish Congress President Moshe Kantor

File:Interreligious-Meeting - Mustafa Ceric - Herman Van-Rompuy-Marc-Schneier - Abdujalil Sajid - Brussels 2010.jpg
– Bosnia –
First Gathering of European Muslim and Jewish leaders in Brussels, December 2010 –
Grand Mufti Mustafa Ceric – European Council President Herman Van-Rompuy –
Rabbi Marc-Schneier – Imam Dr. Abdujalil Sajid


Brazil – President Lula (Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva)


Brazil – President Lula (Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva)
at the “holocaust” centre Yad Vashem, Israel


Brazil – (above) President Lula with Chabad members
(below) blowing the Ram’s Horn

https://i0.wp.com/w3.chabad.org/media/images/483/Xlgv4834050.jpg
Brazil –  first female president Dilma Rousseff, before the election


Canada – Prime Minister Stephen Harper


Canada – Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird, at Kfar Chabad


Canada – Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird

Photo: Thank you to everyone who came out tonight to the Jewish Heritage Month reception at Queen's Park!
Canada – MPP Mike Colle hosting Jewish Heritage Month at Queen’s Park –
OJA (Ontario Jewish Archives) of UJA- (United Jewish Appeal)


MPP Monte Kwinter, MPP Peter Shurman, MPP Mike Colle,
Councillor James Pasternak – at Lipa Green Centre for UJA


Councillor James Pasternak, Associate Director, Ontario Government Relations
At the Lipa Green Centre – The Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs (CIJA)

Infection on all levels…


Regional Councillor Rosati, Councillor Sheffman, Mayor Maurizio Bevilacqua,
Councillor DeFrancesca and Regional Councillor Michael DiBiase
Ontario Jewish Heritage Month — at Lipa Green Centre.


United Jewish Appeal campaign booklet, 1947,
For: “restoration of Palestine” and “resettlement in Canada”

https://i0.wp.com/www.loc.gov/exhibits/haventohome/images/hh0165s.jpg
United Jewish Appeal
Propaganda for support of refugee Jews in Europe and Palestine

Photo: Happy Victoria Day! We hope you are enjoying the long weekend. Although the OJA does not have any photographs of Queen Victoria, we have the next best thing: a photo of her great great granddaughter Queen Elizabeth II. Queen Elizabeth was in town for the dedication of the Mount Sinai Hospital in 1973.</p> <p>Monty Simmonds, Q.C., with Her Majesty the Queen Elizabeth II, Prince Philip and Bert Gerstein on the dedication of Mount Sinai Hospital, 600 University Ave., Toronto, 1973, OJA, photo #3675.
Queen Elizabeth II, Prince Philip, Monty Simmonds, Q.C, and Bert Gerstein
dedication of Mount Sinai Hospital, 600 University Ave., Toronto, Canada, 1973
–Ontario Jewish Archives (OJA), photo #3675.


Montreal, Canada – Mayor Michael Applebaum

“I am going to put my energies into my defense and into my family,”
Applebaum, who insists he is innocent, said.
“This is why I am resigning as mayor of Montreal –
it is the responsible thing to do,” he stressed.

Applebaum’s platform as Mayor was a promise to
“clean up Montreal’s culture of corruption”.

Not so ironically, this Jewish politician was recently charged with corruption in office!

–=–


Costa Rica – President Oscar Arias in Israel


Denmark – former Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen
(here as Secretary General of NATO)
with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu

–=–
The Crown Temple
And The United Kingdom Of Jerusalem
–=–

http://www.jpost.com/HttpHandlers/ShowImage.ashx?ID=10089
Great Britain – Queen Elizabeth

https://i2.wp.com/w3.chabad.org/media/images/354/NcRD3541928.jpg
Great Britain – Queen Elizabeth
This was the one person she knew not to shake hands with


Great Britain – Queen Elizabeth

Britain's Ambassador to Israel Matthew Gould and President Shimon Peres toast Queen Elizabeth II at an event marking her Diamond Jubilee (photo credit: Roni Schutzer/Flash90)
Britain’s Ambassador to Israel Matthew Gould with President Shimon Peres
toasting Queen Elizabeth II on her Diamond Jubilee…

“(the) president is one of few people who can match the monarch in uniting people”

–=–

Video: Queen Elizabeth II knights Israel President Shimon Peres

–=–

http://i1.wp.com/www.loonwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/prince_charles_yarmulke.jpg?resize=183%2C250
Prince Charles of Wales, regent to the British crown


Prince Charles of Wales


Winston Churchill with Bernard Baruch, the leader of Israel, in 1961.
–Library of Congress


“The late Prime Minister’s bronze image now looks out from the
Montefiore Gardens over the Tower of David to Jerusalem’s Old City,
which he first visited in 1921 with Lawrence of Arabia.”

Nir Barkat, Mayor of Jerusalem claimed the Second World War leader
as a champion for Jerusalem and Israel at the ceremony,
which was attended by Randolph Churchill, the prime minister’s
great grandson, and British Ambassador Mathew Gould.”

–=–

“During times like these, when the free world is faced with the threat of a nuclear
Iran and global terrorism, it is important to preserve Churchill’s legacy, having
led the world to victory against the Nazi tyrant, in Jerusalem,
the city of peace of freedom…”

–Isaac Herzog, a Labor MK who led the statue’s installation to Israel Hayom.

(Never mind that Israel is one of only three nuclear armed nations that
refused to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, for which Iran did sign)

–=–


Great Britain (U.K.) Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher
“The first British PM to visit Israel while in office”
In Israel with Golda Meir during her visit to Israel in 1976


Margaret Thatcher with Israel President Shimon Peres


Margaret Thatcher and Israeli President Yitzhak Shamir


With Israeli Minister of Industry and Trade Ariel Sharon in Jerusalem, May 1986


With Netanyahu


Thatcher with Menachem Begen

–=–
Death Of The Iron Lady
–=–

Excerpt from Israel’s Technion website (http://pard.technion.ac.il/technion-honors-baroness-margaret-thatcher/):

It is with sadness that the Technion – Israel Institute of Technology heard of the passing away of Britain’s former Prime Minister Baroness Margaret Thatcher. Thatcher was a keen friend and supporter of the Technion and had a sharp insight into the importance of the institute for the region and the world.

On Nov. 2nd 1989, Prime Minister Thatcher received an Honorary Doctorate from Technion President Dr Max Reis “in recognition of her life-long involvement in and passion for science and technology; her exceptional statesmanship in British and world affairs; and in gratitude for her friendship to the State of Israel.” The ceremony took place in Whitehall.

The proceeds of the function made possible the Margaret Thatcher Centre for Computational Chemistry

Below is the acceptance speech of Baroness Thatcher.

Sir Evelyn, Mr. Galil, [Immanuel Jakobovits] Chief Rabbi, your excellency, my lords, ladies and gentlemen.

Thank you for the very great honour you do me, — first by making me an honorary doctor of technical sciences of the Technion university and, — second, by naming the centre for computational chemistry at the university after me…

https://i0.wp.com/pard.technion.ac.il/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/thatcherwear.jpg

De Beers is the Jewish Zionist  Rothschild funded mining empire of Cecil Rhodes.

–=–

“Common sense tells us that the only way to increase the value
of diamonds is to make them scarce, that is to reduce production.”

—Cecil Rhodes, founder of De Beers Mining, who received funding
and for which De Beers is now owned by the founding Zionist ROTHSCHILD FAMILY.

“Our only risk is the sudden discovery of new mines, which
human nature will work recklessly to the detriment of us all.”

—Cecil Rhodes, founder of De Beers Mining

Surprise! Diamonds are all but worthless! The goy can be made to covet any rock or mineral by the manipulative international Jew. They control the markets, production, and pricing of shiny rocks. False scarcity has made gold king, silver queen, and turned the people into greedy debt slaves who have traded their freedom and physical wealth for fiat paper – all to buy jewelry!

–=–


If it were a snake it would have bit you…
For Americans, every dollar we spend not only supports Israel
but also has an embossed Star of David stamped on every note!


The Orion-tation Of Money

The EURion (Orion) Constellation is on most world currencies as a
“security feature”. It is in the shape of a “Z”.


“EURion Constelation” symbols are a counterfeiting measure where each zero
lines up by integer ratios between the squared distances of nearby circles,
shaped as the Orion constellation. This pattern is detected by image-processing software,
which causes the program to refuse to print the document. The Great pyramids
aligned to this Orion-tation (SE) and is very important in masonic custom.

This Orion security feature is now as international as the Zionist influence
that created it, with the all major central banks of the world utilizing it as a
digital watermark on their currencies. The International bankers are the
International bloodline – organized crime extraordinaire.

If currency represents sovereignty, then sovereignty no longer truly exists in this world.

–=–

Margaret Thatcher is also quoted from above as saying:

“Technion’s reputation extends far, far beyond the borders of Israel.
Technion’s work in every field – medicine, science, architecture –
is synonymous with the creation of the modern state of Israel.”

–=–

Upon the death of Margaret Thatcher, the Jewish Press in April 2013 revealed the true history of her treachery to her ridiculously loyal subjects:

“…it was Thatcher’s embrace of British Jews and insistent promotion of Jews in her Conservative Party that inspired an outpouring of tributes from Jewish and Israeli leaders following her death Monday at 87…

For the country’s Jews, however, her naming of several of their number to Cabinet positions and her determined pushback against anti-Jewish grumbling among the Conservative Party’s backbenchers made what once was unimaginable: the possibility of a Jewish prime minister.

Lady Thatcher was always extremely supportive and admiring of the ethos of the British Jewish community,” Vivian Wineman, the president of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, told JTA.

Wineman said the mutual admiration was rooted in personal history. In the 1930s, Thatcher’s family took in an Austrian Jewish refugee. In 1959, Thatcher was elected to Parliament representing Finchley, a north London constituency with a large Jewish population.

She counted a number of Jews among her closest advisers and confidants, and at one point nearly a quarter of her Cabinet were of Jewish origins,” Wineman said.

Moshe Maor, a Hebrew University political science professor whose expertise is Britain, said Thatcher admired the British Jewish community’s self-reliance, an ethos she embraced as she dedicated herself to weaning Britons off public assistance.

“Thatcher admired hard work, and the Jewish community was not dependent on the state,” Maor said. “It was structured in such a way that Jews help others in their community. That was the culture Thatcher tried to advance.”

It was one also embraced by Britain’s late chief rabbi, Immanuel Jakobovits, whom Thatcher elevated to the House of Lords. Frustrated by protests among Christian leaders of the rapid pace of her economic reforms, she increasingly turned for spiritual reinforcement to Jakobovits, who became widely known as “Thatcher’s rabbi.”

Thatcher’s rule coincided with social changes among the country’s 350,000 Jews. Once proudly working class, British Jews by the 1980s had become increasingly middle class, more likely to be self-employed and alarmed at the leftward lurch of the leadership in the Labor Party.

“She got on quite well with Jews,” Wineman said. “She said once that she thought she probably had more constituents in Tel Aviv than in Finchley.”

Thatcher never hesitated to advance the careers of talented young Jews in her party – among them Leon Brittan, a secretary of trade; Nigel Lawson, a chancellor of the exchequer; Edwina Currie, a health minister; Malcolm Rifkind, a secretary of state for Scotland; and Michael Howard, a secretary of employment.

Rifkind went on to become foreign minister. Howard became home secretary and then opposition leader, burying forever the notion that a British leader had to come from the country’s official faith, Anglicanism.

Thatcher’s embrace of the Jewish community did not make its romance with the Tories a permanent one. Tony Blair’s purges of the Labor left after his 1997 election helped draw back some Jewish voters. But Howard’s precedent helped set the stage for ascension of the current leader of the Labor Party, Ed Miliband, the son of Polish Jewish immigrants.

Thatcher also earned kudos for her robust foreign policy and maintaining strong ties with Israel at a time of tension between the Jewish state and other European nations. “She was truly a great leader, a woman of principle, of determination, of conviction, of strength; a woman of greatness,” Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a statement Monday. “She was a staunch friend of Israel and the Jewish people. She inspired a generation of political leaders.”

Source–> http://www.jewishpress.com/news/europe/thatcher-remembered-for-befriending-uk-jews-and-maintaining-strong-ties-with-israel/2013/04/10/

–=–
Establishing Socialism
Through Multiculturalism

–=–

This is the world-wide phenomenon of how, as the above article states, “the unimaginable” election of “Jews” to offices of high authority is now commonplace, especially in predominantly Christian and Muslim countries. Just as in Germany, the Jewish immigrants have taken hold of, culturally infiltrated and tainted, and financially advanced themselves on the backs of societies and majority races across the world. And this is how the governments of the world have been infected.

This article even rubs this corruption and subversion in the face of the British, referring to “anti-Jewish grumbling among the Conservative Party’s backbenchers in other words the actual majority race of British men for whom the international Jews have made insignificant in their own country; just as in the United States and around the nations of the world for all non-Jewish majority cultures and races (goy).

In short, the people no longer have representation…

And this is how “multiculturalism” is being used around the world as a tool for the cultural destruction of significance for all races who have inhabited those countries for 1,000’s of years. For the international Jew must break a nation of its cultural and racial identity before it can corrupt that culture with its own. And to do this, the international Jew must take over the governments of all cultures. This devious plan is implemented in many forms, from “civil rights” to “equal rights”, “naturalization” to “illegal immigration”; “equal opportunity” to the “right of return”, “affirmative action” to “hate crimes”, and in countless other cultural countermeasures that seem glorious and revolutionary.

But what is a revolution, really?

Revolution:

A: a sudden, radical, or complete change.

B: a fundamental change in political organization; especially:
the overthrow or renunciation of one government or ruler
and the substitution of another by the governed.

C: activity or movement designed to effect fundamental
changes in the socioeconomic situation.

D: a fundamental change in the way of thinking about or visualizing
something : a change of paradigm <the Copernican revolution>

We must always remember an inconvenient truth… subjection to law requires consequence and force. This should be understood now more than ever, as nearly all nations of the world have been usurped by international Zionists hell-bent on supporting the re-built Kingdom/State of Israel. You may call them the Ashkenazim or “the Jews” – or those who claim to be but are not Jews. You may call them the Edomites or the Synagogue of Satan. You may call them the Freemasons or the Illuminati. You may call them the Royal bloodlines. But there is no real difference. For all of these pseudonyms have but one final and fundamental purpose in their combined doctrines – to reclaim the Kingdom of Jerusalem (Israel) and rebuild the Temple of Solomon (the 3rd Temple of Ezekiel). The blood is the same. The more you blame just one of these groups instead of all of them together as one blood-force, the more their deeds and usurpation go unseen and unpunished. Truly, a revolution of fundamental change in the way we think in America has already happened, brought on by a fundamental change in political organization by international Zionist infiltration, and this is currently well on its way to having the effect of fundamentally changing our socioeconomic situation in every nation. The people are but following their leaders, never suspecting that this bloodline revolution of leadership had already happened before the people who elected them were even born.

This change (revolution) has not been sudden but incremental, as the Talmud and Protocols demand, though quite radical and very closely complete, so as to be virtually unseen like the growing grass. And it has risen up so high that tradition and culture have been usurped and hidden by the tall infection of weeds.

–=–
Constructing An International
Culture Of  Non-Identity

–=–

“The union which we desire to found will not be a French, English,
Irish,
or German union, but a Jewish one, a Universal one!
Other peoples and races are divided into nationalities;
we alone have no co-citizens, but exclusively co-religionaries…”.
“The day is not distant when all the riches and treasures of the
earth
will become the property of the Children of Israel”.

–The Morning Post of London, on Sept. 6, 1920,
by James Rothschild III: Manifesto to all the Jews of the Universe

–=–

https://i0.wp.com/eyeswideblind.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/Racist-Flag.bmpIt is important to note that the “context” of this particular quote is disputed by Zionist
apologists as a mistranslation of a non-public speech. Of course, 100’s of even more horrific
and racist quotes that litter the Talmud and other rabbinical writings in black
and white are also said by Jews to be contextual and misunderstood by the goy.

–=–

It is purely a logical fallacy to consider the forced intermingling of cultures as in any way good. This ridiculous fallacy is that in order to protect pure blood cultures (majorities and minorities), multiculturalism and interbreeding between those races must be a protected and in some countries even a forced privilege (as we will see below). Cross-race marriage is the poster-child of equality and civil rights issues. Without the Jewish/Masonic concept of political equal rights as a political legal status (a fraternal brotherhood of “citizens”), the minority international Jew would never have been able to corrupt and subvert the majority races by taking seats in their governments. And so the “spread of democracy” continues across the globe through war and oppression (law through force), so that all people become equal under government law (equally enslaved by the privilege of law). In this way, the people can be tricked into “democratically electing” a Jewish/Masonic friendly (Zionist) government against the best interests of all people – a single supremest minority ruling the majorities in most countries of the world. If you control the majority with media brainwashing and propaganda, then you can manipulate public opinion and guide that majority to vote for a minority to represent the majority against its interests. This is madness… and this is the way of the international Jew and of the “United Nations” of the world.

So riddle me this… how does cross-race (multicultural) procreation support or preserve one single race and culture? Isn’t this what we are taught by our Zionist government and media? Isn’t this an oxymoron?

Yet in the international Jewish society of all infiltrated nations, it is absolutely forbidden (with devious exceptions) for such marriages between Jews and non-Jews according to the Jewish Talmud and Torah! The royal bloodlines have been interbreeding for many centuries before Christ. Their whole “religion”, eminence, cultural status, and nobility in society and government is based on pure blood. And the negative (Rh-) and positive (Rh+) blood types do not mix well, often causing birth issues via interbreeding from the two bloods rejecting each other. In other words, while the international Zionist governments are passing laws protecting the infiltration and intermarriage of cultures and races into such countries as France, Germany, United States, and Great Britain with its United Kingdom, breaking 1,000’s of years of the proud racial heritage and heredity of those people, the State of Israel and Zionist international Jewry remains pure blood and generally forbids marriage to non-Jews (non-Jewish blood). Even the royal kings and queens must advocate their thrown for this crime of interbreeding with “commoner” blood. When King Edward advocated his throne due to marriage of a Catholic in 1936, he resigned that throne for his future decedents of that tainted marriage as well…

“I, Edward the Eighth of Great Britain, Ireland, and the British Dominions beyond the Seas, King, Emperor of India, do hereby declare my irrevocable determination to renounce the throne for myself and for my descendants, and my desire that effect should be given to the instrument of abdication immediately…”

(Signed) Edward R.I.

What better way to protect the Edomite race and bloodlines than to force racial equality and mingling in every nation – with the exception of their own – until no proud racial majority, cultural ideal, or moral force is left to oppose you?

–=–

–=–


It is indeed ironic that those Jews who were hunted and loathed yesteryear as illegal immigrants in England are today promoting multicultural immigration in all forms to all countries except in their own xenophobic Meca, Israel, which the United Kingdom all but conquered militarily and created for them through treatise and bloodshed.

Now if this sounds “racist” or “prejudiced” to you, you better take off your rose-colored glasses and pay attention. For the ultimate in racist people are ruling you, infiltrating your cultures, and destroying your family unit in favor of their own “race”. This is not a white issue, for white is not a race – and “white” people of European descent have been blamed unilaterally for the actions of this tiny minority of white-skinned Edomites. It was the Jew who created this fallacy, with the German peoples as its poster child. They suck out all culture and values through that little box in your home called a television, for they are CEO’s of all mainstream media outlets. They are the self-proclaimed master race. And if racism is the appreciation and the study of unique races, what happens when there are only two races left to study – the Jew and the diversely molded mixed-slave-race?

–=–

The 12 step program, or how to usurp a nation and its identity:

Step 1 – Immigrate and infiltrate religious, social, and political constructs.

Step 2 – Set up usurious business practices and promote them as normal; create patriotic catchphrases like “free trade”, “free market”, and “capitalism” as you funnel public funds into your corporate usury-based businesses. Replace natural laws with contracts, duty with forced obligations, and natural rights with political privileges and benefits.

Step 3 – Demand equal rights (protections) under law, not natural or earned ones, and subsume all property as State-owned.

Step 4 – Gain international appeal for the cause of equality within a global media network.

Step 5 – Pretend not to be Jewish or disassociate publicly from Zionism to win government seats.

Step 6 – Through usury and debt, take over the economy with undisclosed public funding.

Step 7 – Win a majority of government seats for Jews and non-Jewish Zionists.

Step 8 – Pass laws requiring taxes to be sent to Jewish organizations, campaigns, and to Israel.

Step 9 – Pass hate speech laws and other forms of protections for all forms of religion/race/sex/organization so as to pretend to be a moral group deserving protection, hiding amongst protected classes.

Step 10 – Revise history and pass new laws making race, culture, and morals obsolete except for your own, supporting Israel and no other nation.

Step 11 – Export labor and manufacturing and import consumerism (utilize trade unions, labor laws, and misuse public funds to support these efforts).

Step 12 – Allow and protect illegal immigration; use propaganda to gain immigrant votes (children are citizens); demonize cultural or racial majority as the enemy of immigrants. After a few generations, a new majority appears, conditioned to be Jewish/Zionist friendly.

Step 13 – Repeat in all countries until each is dependent on the other.

Step 14 – Cause international appeal for war against uncooperative or incorruptible nations if above steps don’t work or if opposed (as in Germany), then place new Zionist/corporate friendly governments through martial law.

–=–

–=–
Chronology Of Jewish Deception And Ruination
–=–

How does one exclaim the horrific history of the genocide, torture, rape, and famine that was perpetrated upon over 100 million white Christian farmers and peoples of Europe, Asia, and the Ethiopian Jews of Africa by the Jewish/Zionist Red Army in the “Bolshevik Revolution”, when the fable of the Nazi holocaust that supposedly killed 6 million Jews (a statistically impossible feat) is promoted and reinforced in every form of mainstream media?

In reality, the communism that was forged and implemented in 1917 continues to this day by its Edomite organizers, the international Zionists, under their oppressive regimes and “allied forces”. Inversely, Nazism rose up in response to this horror to protect the Germanic people from that international Zionist scourge, and only lasted from 1933 through 1945.

Of course, World War I was a “family affair”, as all of the countries involved were ruled by the kindred blood cousins of King George V. There was not war, only a bloodline family manipulating the nationalist fervor of each of its kingdoms and forcing commerce within its corporations. This is called “war”.

It is a little known fact that the Jews in Germany identified themselves as Germans before World War II, and were quite content to stay in Germany. They did not wish to become citizens of the new Israel. They were Germans. It was thus necessary for the World Jewish Congress to create a Jewish problem in Germany by declaring a world-wide economic war on Germany and its people by international Jewry, forcing the German people to respond against the German Jews…

https://i2.wp.com/www.jewisheastend.com/Plaque%20Settlement%20Henriques%20St.jpg
War Memorial Plaque of Oxford and St George’s Settlement
(Bernhard Baron House), London – for World War I


1933

https://i0.wp.com/www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/articles/jdecwardayexp.jpg

https://i2.wp.com/upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8f/MSG_III_1937_Anti-Nazi_Rally.jpgAnti-German protest at Madison Square Garden, 1937
Speakers included John L. Lewis, head of the CIO, New York’s Mayor Fiorello LaGuardia,
and Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, head of the American Jewish Congress.


The Ramaz School forms its name from the initials (RMZ) of the
world renownedRabbi Moses Zevulun Margolies, (1851-1936).
“The RaMaZ” was recognized as dean of the American rabbinate.
In 1933, the RaMaZ here addresses a mass rally at Madison Square Garden
protesting the threat to Jews in Nazi Germany.

Stephen S. Wise, later to become president of the World Jewish Congress, speaks at an anti-Nazi rally at Madison Square Garden. New York, United States, March 27, 1933.
Stephen S. Wise, later president of the World Jewish Congress,
speaks at an anti-Nazi rally at Madison Square Garden in 1933


New York Mayor Fiorello La Guardia speaks at Jewish Labor Committee, 1935.
Here with founding members of the JLC, David Dubinsky of the International
Ladies’ Garment Workers Union and B. Charney Vladeck, chairman of the JLC.
Major efforts of this organization include an anti-Nazi boycott and
efforts to reform U.S. immigration laws that excluded refugees. 

You didn’t think he had an airport named after him
just because he was a mayor, did you?

–=–

Most “labor unions” had a Jewish organized criminal origin. For as with all systems of government, the Jew must first take over the foundation of its prey before it can subvert and destroy. Today, high wages caused by union contracts and otherwise high wages are the primary excuse used by Jewish run corporations for exporting American corporations and labor oversees. The number of corporations that are in general Jewish run and funded by goy taxpayer dollars – government being the main shareholder in most national and international corporations – would astound the average American…

–=–

Boycotting The Jewish 500?

Just a small fraction of Jewish owned business and supporters of Zionism (Israel) are listed here:

1. Sears/K Mart – Sears was controlled nearly from its inception by the Julius Rosenwald family, and then by Max Adler, who married Sophie Rosenwald. A Significant number of the company’s shares are still Jewish controlled to this day.
2. The Home Depot – The Home Depot was founded in 1978 by Bernie Marcus, Arthur Blank (Atlanta Falcons), Ron Brill, and Pat Farrah. This is the second largest retailer in America, behind Wal-Mart. The Jewish founders retain substantial holdings in the company.
3. Victoria’s Secret (Les Wexner)
4. The Limited (Les Wexner)
5. Bath & Body Works (Les Wexner)
6. The Men’s Wearhouse ( George Zimmer)
7. Staples Office Supply (Thomas G. Stemberg)
8. Office Depot (Merged with Staples, Thomas G. Stemberg)
9. Bon Ton Stores (Founded by Max Grumbacher) – Also includes the following stores: Elder-Beerman, Parisian, Saks Inc., Bergner’s, Boston Store, Carson Pirie Scott, Herbergers, Younkers, Pomeroy’s, Maxwell’s, Fowler’s Department Store
10. Steve & Barry’s University Sportswear (Steve Shore & Barry Prevor)
11. The Gap (Donald Fisher, founder, holds 37% of stock)
12. Banana Republic (Donald Fisher, founder, holds 37% of stock)
13. Old Navy (Donald Fisher, founder, holds 37% of stock)
14. American Eagle Outfitters (founded 1904 by Edward Beinstein. Current CEO J.L. Schottenstein)
15. ABC Warehouse
16. Circuit City (founded 1949 as Wards Appliance Store by Samuel S. Wurtzel, Jewish)
17. Costco Warehouses (founded 1954 by Sol Price, Jewish, as Fed Mart)
18. Spencer Gifts (Steve Silverstein, CEO. Privately held corporation)
19. Eddy Bauer
20. Starbucks (Howarad D. Schultz, CEO)

GMAC – Owned by Cerberus Capital Management, which is headed by Steve Feinberg.

“…We would also challenge them to consider that AOL allocates 30% of its investment portfolio in Israel. Does that effect how CNN reports on the Israeli/Palestinian conflict? At NileMedia, we think it does. The “spin” wizards at CNN, TIME and AOL are not in the journalism business.” —Nile Media

–=–

In your free time, take a look at these links to get a real feel at how difficult or impossible it would be to boycott Jewish businesses in America and beyond – especially when considering that governments are generally the largest institutional investor and holder of ownership stock and corporate bonds (loans to fund corporations) of these companies. It is ironic that the lavish lifestyle we have come to expect has been supplied by this corporate takeover by Jewish businesses funded by the taxpayer dollars of the world. (See my “CAFR School” articles for more info on this.)

List of Jewish American Businesspeople: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Jewish_American_businesspeople

Boycott of Jewish business: http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=71304

To start with, we’d have to give up much of our internet experience, for on the internet – Google, Youtube, Facebook, MySpace, Wikipedia (or as I like to call it… do-it-yourself history), Yahoo, Ebay, and many others are great supporters of Zionism.

Porn, ABC, NBC, CBS, FOX, HBO, CNN, MSNBC, Hollywood (all mainstream media, movie, and newspaper outlets), Caterpillar, Est’ee Lauder, Johnson and Johnson, Revlon, Kimberly-Clark (Kleenex and Huggies), Apax Partners (Jonny Rockets, Sunglass Hut), Delta Galil (Barbie, Victoria’s Secret, GAP, Banana Republic, Structure, J. Crew, JC Penny, DKNY, Ralph Lauren, Hugo Boss), Timberland, Siemens, Sara Lee (oh, not the cookies!), The Limited, Nokia, Motorola, AT&T (and most phone companies) Bank of America, Wells Fargo, J.P. Morgan Chase… Oh heck, let’s just say all major banks, shall we? Chevron, BP, Exxon… Ok, I suppose all of the major oil corporations as well – No driving either…

And then there’s our food…

To boycott Nestle Corporation for example would be extremely difficult . You’d have to stop using L’Oreal products. It would mean no more Kit Kats, Baby Ruths, or Butterfingers. No Nesquick or Nescafe’ for breakfast. No sweets or cookies from Libby’s. No Carnation products of any kind. No Buitoni oils, pastas, or sauces. And then there is the bottled water market… Arrowhead, Poland Spring, Perrier, San Pellegrino (Perrier’s competitor – LOL), Calistoga (San Pellegrino’s competitor – LOL2), Crystal Geyser, Ice Mountain, Zephyr Hills, Ozarka, Pure Life/Pureza Vital, Deer Park, Aquapod, Nestle’ Brand, and others… all of which are brands of Nestle’. Essentially, all bottled water brands are Zionist Israel friendly. And why not, for in the classic scheme of usury they are selling something that flows freely to a bunch of us nincompoops who pay top dollar for somewhat filtered tap water!

This brings a whole new meaning to the word Sayan:

Sayan (Hebrew: helpers, assistants) is a term used to describe a network of “Jews” living outside of Israel who volunteer to provide assistance to the Israeli Mossad.

In fact, with regards to our consumerism on a global scale of primarily Jewish products, all the people of the world may as well convert to Judaism – not that their blood would be accepted. For we are all a Sayan in our ignorance of our own consumer-based support of Israel.

The “Jewish Achievement” website states:

“The selection of Irving Shapiro to head Dupont Corporation was a watershed moment in the history of Jews as CEOs of major U.S. Corporations. His appointment was seen to have broken a cultural logjam. It made Wall Street Journal headlines on December 14, 1973 and Shapiro was soon regarded as a prominent “business establishment” figure. For many, he was seen as “the first Jew to achieve such stature in a major corporation not founded or purchased by Jews.”

Shapiro’s selection was remarkable on many counts. In the 171 years since its founding by French immigrant Eleuth̩re Ir̩n̩e (E.I.) du Pont in 1802, the Company was headed only by succeeding generations of Dupont family members. Further, Shapiro was neither an entrepreneur, nor was he trained as a manager. He did not, as was common in post World War II America, work his way up the organization chart through the rungs of operational, sales, and staff jobs…”

Remember, the boards of directors of corporations elect the CEO, and the shareholders of stock vote via proxy for the boards of directors. When government’s started gaining in power with their stock portfolios and banding together in “corporate governance”, while also taking over the international governments of the world as leaders, it is no wonder that  a “family company” would suddenly be run by a Jew with no experience or honor. And so it is even more disturbing to note that when a corporation moves to say China, it is the government that is voting to make that happen at the expense of its own people. Literally, government through its proxy shareholder votes often forces this to happen. Even worse, government funds the move and construction costs to export manufacturing by offering corporate bonds from taxpayer money. America is an excellent example of what happens to a people when its government is usurped by the intentional Zionist powers and used against that people to cause them to be in debt and dependance. While it took war to ruin Germany, America has been slowly demolished from the inside – its people too scared to be portrayed as “Nazi’s” for fighting the international Jew that has made them debt slaves.

A brilliant incremental plan of manipulation and take-over, if you ask me…

–=–

DuPont corporation is also a perfect example of the danger of segregating the word “Jew” absent of words like Masonry, royal bloodlines, church, etc, as if they are not connected. For the DuPont family were bloodline cousins of the royal families – of the Plantagenet kings and queens of England and beyond who lost the Kingdom of Jerusalem and created the Magna Carta, The Constitution, and the Declaration of Independence…

Royal Arms of England (1198-1340).svg
Angevins – House of Plantagenet “Coat of Arms”
Founded by: Geoffrey Plantagenet, Count of Anjou
Last Sovereign: Richard III of England

Kingdom of England, Kingdom of France, Lordship of Ireland, Principality of Wales

Religions:
Roman Catholicism (official), Greek Orthodoxy,
Syrian Orthodoxy, Islam, Judaism

Capital City of the Kingdom of Jerusalem: Jerusalem (1099–1187)
Tyre (1187–1191)
Acre (1191–1229)
Jerusalem (1229–1244)
Acre (1244–1291)


Near East in 1135.
The kingdom of Jerusalem and the other Crusader states.
Today, it stands as the reconquered kingdom – the “State” of Israel,
and the bloodlines rule their Kingdom once more.

Read about the Kings of Jerusalem, here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Kings_of_Jerusalem

–=–

Perhaps you’ve noticed this Coat of Arms lion or variations of it (horses, serpents, etc.) on many of the product packages you purchase and consume? Or perhaps you passed over it with a cursory glance…

If you buy cigarettes, you see this:

The family crests for the bloodline royal houses decorate and adorn many products. Here we see the phrase “veni-vidi-vici” under that Masonic royal symbol.

Translated, this is a phrase exclaimed by Julius Caesar which means, “I came – I saw – I conquered”.

Indeed, cigarettes are a crowning achievement in the conquering of the consumer idiocracy, for government has financially funded and invested in the corporations that have addicted all nations while being the regulators of those products.

After it taxes the hell out of the consumer, government then uses those taxpayer monies
to reinvest in the same corporations that make other taxable products!
Government then deceivingly uses reverse psychology as advertising to
justify its allowance of such addictive, harmful, and deadly products.
For government is also heavily invested in the medical and pharmaceutical
industries that treat the illnesses caused from these legal products.
More profits, more taxes, more investments…

–=–

And the people actually defend their addictions as if it were their own free will…

–=–

This is certainly not a new model, for the Honorable East India Company
has been addicting the nations of the world for centuries…
as well-depicted here in the movie “The Rising”

–=–

Coat of Arms for Bristol, England

Coat of Arms for the  House of Stuart which reigned between 1603 and 1688.
Henry VIII made a law mandating the display of the royal coat of arms in all churches.

Coat of Arms of the Netherlands

–=–


Coat of Arms for… a tobacco company?

–=–

And I’m sure alcoholics drink because its their choice…

File:Grand Marnier.svg


Even the enforcement arms of government use the Coat of Arms
The bloodline’s brilliant trinity… Addiction, Taxation, Re-Investment
Government is also heavily invested in the private prison industry!
It profits at every turn, from every angle.

–=–

An easy way to understand how government capitalizes (funds) corporations and stands as major stockholder and bond lender is to simply scan through a typical public pension asset holdings report.

If you want the shock of your life, especially when you consider how many public pension funds there are in the world all controlled by Jewish influenced and infiltrated governments – who vote on issues within these corporations as shareholders like election of board-members and mergers and acquisitions – then take a look at just one report here, from the largest Pension fund in America:

Link–>http://www.calpers.ca.gov/eip-docs/about/pubs/annual-investment-report-2012.pdf

When one single government agency has 15,036,400 shares of EXXON MOBIL CORP with a market value of $1.3 billion dollars (see report), is it any wonder that governments don’t take oil companies to task for their spills? It would be bad for the investment portfolio and cut into government dividends from its stock ownership in EXXON!!!

–=–

The temptation for the average worker to earn higher wages than others as a “privilege” of membership to labor unions was and important key to destroying the economic strength of the people in America. For as the Jew knows all to well… there can be no lavish wealth without equally lavish inequity and poverty. By first establishing equal rights, it was then able to grant special rights and privileges through license to only certain workers, creating a purposeful wealth and class-structure within otherwise skill-less men. And it succeeded in turning slaves into house-slaves; men that would literally fight for their union benefits to the death against their starving brethren. The laborers know that unless others are not protected as they are in their labor unions, they would not earn higher wages for doing the same types of jobs as others. This carrot on a stick ironically created class distinctions even among skill-less laborers.  Its the golden rule – wealth requires poverty. For without poverty, wealth simply cannot be measured. And this is the razor sharp edge of how equality destroys. The establishment of inequality requires the forced endowment of equal rights as a legal status by government, for legal equality (civil rights) takes away all individual liberty and gives power to the representatives of a uniformly equal citizenry – one voice for the entirety of all individuals who give up all personal rights to the group (community), while actually believing that equality is a good thing. Again, how else can the international Jew become equal and protected in all societies and in its organized crime, subversion, and then usurpation of representative (legislative) positions in government (thus controlling the nation), without first forcing legal equality and civil rights that protect the Jew in countries where throughout history the Jew has been exiled? This horrific transformation and corruption of morals and culture allowed the Zionist power of the international Jew first as protected, then as equal, and now as elite.

But this equality is not real – it is not in the hearts and minds of men – for it is nothing but a legal status. It is a piece of paper that the people of Germany realized all to well must be torn to shreds in order to route out the literal parasites who created it.

Equal rights is literally the socialist destruction of all cultures around the world. For this type of equality is not earned but granted without merit. This is not real equality of the heart, but is a false status forced upon all people by force. It is actually another name for slavery. So, where for centuries this Synagogue of Satan has been physically and violently removed and exiled from nations and lands far and wide, it now rests comfortably as a protected and equal religion, a protected and equal false “race”, and the ruler of all of those nations and peoples it once fled in fear from.

Wikipedia states:

Fiorello La Guardia’s mother, Irene Coen, was a Jew from Trieste, the Austro-Hungarian Empire; his maternal grandmother Fiorina Luzzatto Coen was a “Luzzatto”, a member of the prestigious Italian-Jewish family of scholars, kabbalists, and poets and including the famous rabbi Samual David Luzzatto. La Guardia was elected mayor of New York City on an anti-corruption Fusion ticket during the Great Depression, which united him in an alliance with New York’s Jewish population and liberal bluebloods (WASPs). In 1937, speaking before the Women’s Division of the American Jewish Congress, La Guardia called for the creation of a special pavilion at the upcoming New York World’s Fair “a chamber of horrors” for “that brown-shirted fanatic“. La Guardia’s sister, Gemma La Guardia Gluck, was arrested by the Germans in a roundup of Jews in Hungary in 1944. She was held under privileged conditions at Ravensbrück concentration camp and released after the war. David Rockefeller became La Guardia’s “secretary” for eighteen months in a “dollar a year” public service position, filling the office of the deputy mayor. In 1941, President Roosevelt appointed La Guardia as the director of the new Office of Civilian Defense (OCD).

–=–

Program for a counter-Olympics held in Randall's Island, New York, in August 1936. The event was sponsored by the Amateur Athletic Union, the American Federation of Labor, the Jewish Labor Committee, and New York City Mayor Fiorello LaGuardia.
Program for a counter-Olympics held in Randall’s Island, New York, in August 1936.
It was sponsored by the Amateur Athletic Union, the American Federation of Labor,
the Jewish Labor Committee, and New York City Mayor Fiorello LaGuardia.
(USHMM #14921/Jewish Labor Committee Collection, New York University)

This cartoon appeared in <i>The Jewish Chronicle</i>, July 10, 1936. The text, laden with sarcasm, says: “Nazis are officially instructed to be courteous to Jews from June 30 to September 1 so that visitors to the Olympic Games may take away a good impression. 1) It is forbidden to bump Jews with iron bars without first saying excuse me. 2) It is forbidden to kick Jewesses in tramcars without first rising and offering your seat.”
This cartoon appeared in The Jewish Chronicle, July 10, 1936.
“Nazis are officially instructed to be courteous to Jews from June 30 to September 1
so that visitors to the Olympic Games may take away a good impression.”

Maintaining the illusion of the “evil German Nazi” was difficult and, like the holocaust,
had to be explained away when the fallacy was visibly rebutted –
Here, fallacy is being promoted that the Nazis are not on good behavior at all times,
but only at the Olympics because they are on film or will be witnessed. Ironically, they are only evil
when there are no real witnesses to corroborate the Jewish stories…

–=–

File:1936 World Jewish Congress First Plenary Assembly Geneva.jpg
First Plenary Assembly of the World Jewish Congress in Geneva, August 1936
This is world organized crime in the making.

File:1948 World Jewish Congress Montreux - 1.jpg
Delegates at the Second Plenary Assembly of the
World Jewish Congress in Montreux, Switzerland, June 1948

https://i0.wp.com/www.loc.gov/exhibits/haventohome/images/hh0183s.jpg
President Truman signs United States recognition of the “State” of Israel

File:World Jewish Congress - Third Plenary Assembly - Geneva 1953.jpg
Third Plenary Assembly of the World Jewish Congress,
Geneva, Switzerland, 4-11 August 1953

https://i0.wp.com/upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/96/1975_WJC_Sixth_Plenary_Assembly_Jerusalem.jpg/330px-1975_WJC_Sixth_Plenary_Assembly_Jerusalem.jpg
Nahum Goldman addressing the Sixth WJC Plenary in Jerusalem in 1975.
Seated on the right: Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin

–=–
The Jewish newspaper Natscha Retsch wrote:

“The war against Germany will be waged by all Jewish communities, conferences, congresses… by every individual Jew. Thereby the war against Germany will ideologically enliven and promote our interests, which require that Germany be wholly destroyed. The danger for us Jews lies in the whole German people, in Germany as a whole as well as individually. It must be rendered harmless for all time…. In this war we Jews have to participate, and this with all the strength and might we have at our disposal.”

**Note: This is racism, also known as eugenics

This Jewish declaration of war and boycott preceded Hitler’s infamous speech of March 28, 1933, which was purely a defensive rebuttal of this declaration of economic war by international Zionism. It was certainly and rightly labeled as a “Jewish problem”.

The Balfour Declaration of 1917 committed the British government to ‘view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people’ – as long as this did not ‘prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine’.

Vladimir Jabotinsky, founder of the Irgun Zvai Leumi terrorist organisation, wrote in the January 1934 issue of Mascha Rjetach:

“For months now the struggle against Germany is waged by each Jewish community at each conference in all our syndicates and by each Jew all over the world. There is reason to believe that our part in this struggle has general value. We will start a spiritual and material war of all the world against Germany’s ambitions to become once again a great nation, to recover lost territories and colonies. But our Jewish interests demand Germany’s total destruction, collectively and individually. The German nation is a threat to us Jews.’

Emil Ludwig Cohen wrote in his book The New Holy Alliance, Strasburg, 1938:

“Even if Hitler at the last moment would want to avoid war which would destroy him he will, in spite of his wishes, be compelled to wage war.”

Bernard Lechache wrote in The Right to Live (December 1938):

“It is our task to organize the moral and cultural blockade of Germany and disperse this nation. It is up to us to start a merciless war.

The Jewish newspaper Central Blad Voor Israeliten in Nederlands printed on 13 September 1939:

“The millions of Jews living in America, England, France, North Africa and South, not forgetting Palestine, have decided to carry on the war in Germany to the very end. It is to be a war of extermination.

The Toronto Star (26 February 1940) printed a declaration of a Rabbi Perlberg, Director of the British section of the Jewish World Congress:

“The Jewish World Congress is in a state of war with Germany for seven years.”

The Jewish magazine Sentinel of Chicago printed in its issue of October 8th, 1940:

“When the National Socialists and their friends cry or whisper that this [war] is brought about by Jews, they are perfectly right.”

And now, the United Nations has been established and is used to declare an international military or economic war with any who do not cooperate with the International Jew. The term “United Nations” gains much more sympathy than the term “World Jewish Congress”, now doesn’t it? And the people of the nations have no idea that their nations were sold.

–=–

Now that international Jewry had instigated an economic war, we see the true
historical perspective of why Germany then defensively boycotted Jewish businesses…

–=–

The one-day German Boycott of April 1, 1933

This was partially a reprisal and an act of revenge against
Gruelpropaganda (atrocity stories) that German and foreign Jews,
assisted by foreign journalists, were allegedly circulating in the
international press to damage Nazi Germany’s reputation…
The organized world Jewish population of every nation against Germany…

The Star of David (Solomon’s Seal) was painted in yellow and black across thousands of
doors and windows, with accompanying anti-commerce slogans against Jews. Signs were
posted saying “Don’t Buy from Jews” and “The Jews Are Our Misfortune.

This is nothing when considering that Jews were openly declaring Germany’s
and the German people’s individual annihilation and extermination.


Note: this is a German businessman, not a soldier.

The German people stood with the Nazi without fear,
for their country and way of life was at stake from within and without.

In 1920, Hitler stated:

 “This Jewish contamination will not subside, this poisoning of the nation will not end,
until the carrier himself, the Jew, has been banished.”

–The War Path: Hitler’s Germany 1933-1939 from an August 1920 speech in Salzburg

–=–

It is clear that no one can argue with this insightful premonition – regardless of your opinion of this man – and that now we certainly have a world-wide poisoning and infection of all nations. Indeed, this type of boycott should be the scene in America for every business that hires illegal workers at illegal poverty wages and for every /Israel supporting corporation (which is most of them), for history shows that non-violent boycotts work all too well. And this would recognize the destruction of world Jewish power over the people, if the people would simply stop supporting and feeding their own parasites.

But the people watch TV provided by the Jew to entertain, distract, and sell to the goy Jewish “Kosher” products…

Also note that the word “banished” is used here by Hitler. For the Jew had been banished from many nations before poisoning Germany’s well. The notion of the holocaust is a fiction by Jews as we will see later, which covers up the real holocaust of the Jewish run Red Army in Russia. Hitler’s  “Final Solution” was a transfer agreement for deportation of Jews to Palestine in agreement with the Jewish Congress, not their extermination. And this was the goal for the Jewish Congress from the beginning. Even today, Israel offers 10’s of thousands of shekels for Iranian Jews to immigrate to Israel. But like the German Jews, the Iranian Jews identify as Iranians, not Israelis. In this way, Iran is the New Germany.

Fortunately, the Germans and the Red Cross kept meticulous records of this and the true livelihood of Jews in camps – including 100’s upon 100’s of live births. This is so obviously contrary to the concept of extermination… that is, the birth of more Jews and the care they received in state of the art hospitals in the “camps” contradicts the fallacious thought that Jews were being “gassed” and exterminated. A little logic goes a long way!

Hitler’s first response was defensive, not offensive – a single day of boycotting Jewish businesses in Germany in retaliation to the Jewish led boycott by world Jewry in March of 1933. The German economy was already in shambles, and an international boycott on German goods was a literal declaration of war by the international Zionist’s who sought its destruction and the exportation of German Jews to Palestine (leading to the “Transfer Agreement”). This response by Germans was as pathetic a reaction as is happening today, around the world, toward this international Zionist power and its deprivation of world-wide culture and society – the unseen enemy of all men.

An International Jewish Boycott Conference was later held in Amsterdam to coordinate the ongoing boycott campaign, part of the newly proclaimed “World Jewish Economic Federation” (WJEF).

Samuel Untermyer, elected president of the WJEF, delivered this speech on BBC radio, a transcript of which was printed in The New York Times on August 7, 1933, calling for a “sacred war” against Germany:

“When the tale is told… the world will confront a picture so fearful in its barbarous cruelty that the hell of war and the alleged Belgian atrocities pale into insignificance as compared to this devilishly, deliberately, cold-bloodedly planned and already partially executed campaign for the extermination of a proud, gentle, loyal, law-abiding people.. The Jews are the aristocrats of the world. From time immemorial they have been persecuted and have seen their persecutors come and go. They alone have survived. And so will history repeat itself, but that furnishes no reason why we should permit this reversion of a once great nation to the Dark Ages or fail to rescue these 600,000 human souls from the tortures of hell… What we are proposing and have already gone far toward doing, is to prosecute a purely defensive economic boycott that will undermine the Hitler regime and bring the German people to their senses by destroying their export trade on which their very existence depends… We propose to and are organizing world opinion to express itself in the only way Germany can be made to understand…”

Chaim Weizmann, president of both the international “Jewish Agency” and of the World Zionist Organization (and later Israel’s first president), told British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain in a letter published in The London Times on September 6th, 1939 that:

“I wish to confirm, in the most explicit manner, the declarations which I and my colleagues have made during the last month, and especially in the last week, that the Jews stand by Great Britain and will fight on the side of the democracies. Our urgent desire is to give effect to these declarations [against Germany]. We wish to do so in a way entirely consonant with the general scheme of British action, and therefore would place ourselves, in matters big and small, under the coordinating direction of His Majesty’s Government. The Jewish Agency is ready to enter into immediate arrangements for utilizing Jewish manpower, technical ability, resources, etc.”

In other words, international Jewry became the army of Great Britain and subject of the crown, with the goal of establishing Israel – the goal of all involved. That included the German Jews residing in Germany…

Rsgba
A man in the Jewish Brigade, a segment of the British Army
that fought the Germans in Italy in 1944. The rocket says “Hitler’s Gift”.


Jew Oscar Westreich left Berlin and gained a new identity in Palestine.
He eventually joined the British army, whose training of Jewish soldiers proved
crucial to the formation of Israel, as his daughter, Mira Bar-Hillel, explains.
It was British forces who, through this international alliance with the Synagogue of Satan,
forcefully “reconquered” the land of Palestine to claim and re-create the Kingdom of Jerusalem.
And the Temple of Solomon is now ready to be rebuilt.

For unknown to most people, the Star of David is actually the Seal of Solomon.
And the founding of Israel is to Rebuild his 3rd Temple
and reclaim the Kingdom of Jerusalem.

“Set me as a seal upon thy heart”
Song of Solomon 8:6

–=–
Genocide Of Semetics By Ashkenazim
–=–


Jewish immigrant from Ethiopia at Ben Gurion International Airport,
October 29, 2012. Israel recently passed a law banning undocumented
immigrants from sending money out of Israel.

–=–

It is ironic that most people would not consider a black Jew.

It is also the consequence of claiming a Jewish homeland while posing as a Semitic people that ALL JEWS must be allowed to immigrate into Israel. This fact has lead to the severe mistreatment, murder, and genocide by the Ashkenazim against the true Semitic peoples of the world.

Thus, we must consider the illegal “State” of Israel is the enemy of the true Jewish people – the actual Semite lines – which are the black African and Arab people of darker skin. These white Ashkenazim Edomites are the royal bloodlines, the kings and queens, the Order.

One aspect of this age-old genocidal attack on the true Semitic peoples was recently reported upon in Israel by Harretz:

“An inconceivable crime…

Israel’s patronizing and inhumane treatment of Ethiopian women is nothing new.

It’s hard to believe, but in Israel, in 2012, Ethiopian women are forced to receive injections of the Depo-Provera contraceptive. This injection is not a commonly prescribed means of contraception. It is considered a last resort and is usually given to women who are institutionalized or developmentally disabled.”

Source–> http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/an-inconveivable-crime.premium-1.484110

Time Magazine reported in March, 2013, about this Ashkenazim imposed racism against the true Semites:

Israeli Deputy Health Minister Yaakov Litzman has called for an investigation into the reported administering of Depo-Provera contraceptive shots to Ethiopian immigrant women without consent. Depo-Provera is a progestrogin-only contraceptive that is administered every three months through injection. According to Dr. Paula Franklin of Marie Stopes International who spoke with TIME, it is a “safe, medium-term reversible hormonal contraceptive” that is used around the world by women of “informed consent.” However, countless Ethiopian women have reportedly been given this contraceptive without understanding or consent.

The news that Ethiopian women were being injected with Depo-Provera, a contraceptive shown to have links with bone loss, emerged in December 2012 following a documentary by Israeli journalist Gal Gabai. In her short film titled Where Did the Children Disappear to, Gabai revealed that, in the past decade, the birthrate among Ethiopian immigrants had decreased by 50%, writes the Jewish Daily Forward. She discovered that women were denied proper family-planning counseling or an outline of birth control methods from medical staff, while others were informed that their entry into Israel would be blocked if they refused to take the contraceptive, notes the Guardian. Many had no idea what they were being injected with. In the documentary, Gabai offers two possible explanations — either it is “an intention to do good, to prevent poverty and to help with the adjustment to Western urbanized living,” or it’s an “economic calculation to reduce immigration and absorption costs.” “This story reeks of racism, paternalism and arrogance,” Gabai told viewers during the broadcast on Israeli Educational Television.

https://i2.wp.com/www.loc.gov/exhibits/haventohome/images/hh0194s.jpgMoorish Zionist [sic] Temple in Harlem, New York, taken in 1929 by James Van Der Zee,
acclaimed African American photographer who chronicled the Harlem Renaissance.
Note that the American flag and a flag of Zion appear next to one another.
–=–

File:1957 WJC meeting with Mitterrand in Paris.jpgFrench Justice Minister François Mitterrand (left) and leaders of
the World Jewish Congress at a meeting in Paris in June 1957

http://i2.wp.com/www.loonwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/sarkozy-avec-kepa.jpg?resize=320%2C219
France – President Nicolas Sarkozy
Sarkozy with Menorah
France – President Nicolas Sarkozy

France – President Nicolas Sarkozy

–=–
Forced Integration By Law
–=–

In December of 2008, Sarkozy made a disturbing speech. The Brussels Journal reports:

“Recently Nicolas Sarkozy announced plans to pursue a vigorous policy of diversity and métissage. Concretely, this means giving preference to minorities in job hiring and prosecuting those who do not comply. In other words, affirmative action as a government policy from which none are exempt.

In his message Sarkozy insisted that the French people must change, that there will be dire consequences if they don’t, and that not to intermarry racially is bad for the survival of the country. Thus he amalgamated the concepts of preference for minorities in job hiring with that of the need for the French to intermarry racially.”

(Source–>http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/3764)

Some translated excerpts from that speech:

“(…) the objective is to meet the challenge of “métissage” – the challenge of “métissage” that the 21st century is confronting us with. The challenge of “métissage”, France has always been familiar with it, and by meeting the challenge of “métissage” France remains faithful to her history. Moreover, it is consanguinity that has always provoked the end of civilizations and societies.

The verb “métisser” theoretically means to mix blood or to crossbreed, but at times it is used more loosely to mean mix cultures. Sarkozy uses the word, or a form of it, at least 7 times in the first few seconds of his speech.

Other meanings for the word “métisser”?

Take your pick…

“Crossbreeding”; “racial mixing”; “miscegenation”; “mongrelisation” and “bastardisation”.

At the conclusion, Sarkosy stated:

“Ladies and Gentlemen, this is the last thing: If republican will power does not function, it will be necessary for the Republic to resort to even more forcible methods… But we don’t have a choice. Diversity at the base of the country must be reflected by diversity at the head of the country… It is not a choice. It is an obligation. It is an imperative. We cannot do otherwise at the risk of finding ourselves faced with considerable problems… We must change, so we will change.”

Note that Sarkosy is born of a French mother and a Hungarian Jewish father…

–=–


France – President Francois Hollande


France – Bernard Kouchner, Foreign Minister


Georgia – President Mikheil Saakashvili


Georgia – President Mikheil Saakashvili


Germany – Chancellor Angela Merkel at Yad Vashem, Israel


Germany – Chancellor Angela Merkel


Germany – Chancellor Angela Merkel with Netanyahu (and Bush)

–=–
The Zionist Planned Genocide Of Germany
–=–

It was an amazingly brilliant piece of public relations gumption to have perverted history into making Germany out to be the bad guy. The Jewish plan to exterminate the German people was present in World War 1 and Bolshevism, carried over to World War 2, and will no doubt culminate in World War 3.

Mark Weber exposes the historical goals of international Zionism and Jewry:

Photobucket
Germany Must Perish!
by Theodore N. Kaufman, Newark, N.J., Argyle press, Copyright 1941
Library of Congress Call No.: DD222.K3

–=–

Begin Excerpt:

Theodore N. Kaufman, the author of Germany Must Perish, was a Manhattan-born Jewish businessman who was also chairman of a group that called itself the “American Federation for Peace.” The first edition of this slim volume was published in 1940 or early 1941. A second, 96-page edition, which sold for 25 cents, was published in 1941 by Argyle Press of Newark, New Jersey. Both editions were issued when the United States was still officially neutral, that is, before the Pearl Harbor attack of December 7, 1941, that brought the U.S. openly into World War II.

Kaufman’s fervent proposal for the systematic sterilization of the entire German population was given respectful attention in the American press, including reviews in a number of newspapers. A review in the weekly Time magazine, March 24, 1941, called Kaufman’s plan a “sensational idea.”

Germany’s propaganda chief, Joseph Goebbels, seized with delight on the book. “This Jew [Kaufman] has done a disservice to the enemy,” Goebbels privately commented. “If he had composed the book at my behest he couldn’t have done a better job.”

At his direction the German press played up Kaufman’s call for genocide. A front page article about the book in the Berlin daily Der Angriff, July 23, 1941, appeared under headlines that called it a “Diabolical Plan for the Extermination of the German People” and a work of “Old Testament Hatred.” Extracts also appeared, for example, in the nationally-circulated weekly paper Das Reich, August 3, 1941.

A plan similar to Kaufman’s was issued during the war years by a prominent American anthropologist. In an article headlined “Breed War Strain Out of Germans” in the New York daily newspaper P.M., January 4, 1943, Ernest Hooton laid out an “outbreeding” plan that would “destroy German nationalism and aggressive ideology while retaining and perpetuating desirable German biological and sociological capacities.” (See also: Benjamin Colby, ‘Twas a Famous Victory, 1974, p. 131.)

The Harvard University professor’s proposal called for genetically transforming the German nation by encouraging mating of German women with non-German men, who would be brought into the country in large numbers, and of German men, forcibly held outside of Germany, with non-German women. Ten to twelve million German men would be assigned to forced labor under Allied supervision in countries outside of Germany to rebuild their economies. “The objects of this measure,” wrote Dr. Hooton, “include reduction of the birthrate of ‘pure’ Germans, neutralization of German aggressiveness by outbreeding and denationalization of indoctrinated individuals.”

This plan, Hooton estimated, would require at least 20 years to be implemented. “During this period,” he went on, “encourage also the immigration and settlement in the German states of non-German nationals, especially males.”

In the decades since the end of World War II, something of the spirit of the genocidal Kaufman and Hooton plans seems manifest in Germany’s population and immigration policies. Since the nation’s defeat in 1945, the German birth rate has fallen to below the replacement level, millions of racially and culturally alien migrants have been welcomed as settlers in Germany, the number of children of mixed ethnicity has sharply increased, and the ethnic-cultural character of much of the country has been drastically altered, especially in the larger cities.

This dynamic volume outlines a comprehensive plan for the extinction of the German nation and the total eradication from the earth, of all her people. Also contained herein is a map illustrating the possible territorial dissection of Germany and the apportionment of her lands…

End Excerpt

You may read the text of the publication “Germany Must Perish” on Weber’s sight, here:
http://ironlight.wordpress.com/2010/04/22/mainstream-jewish-pre-war-outline-for-german-extermination/

–=–


Greece – Georgios Papandreou in Yad Vashem, Israel


Holland – Queen Beatrix

Hungarian PM with kippa
Hungary – Prime Minister Ferenc Gyurcsany

File:ViktorOrban-WorldJewishCongress-Budapest2013.jpg
Hungary – Prime Minister Viktor Orbán addressing the opening dinner of
the Plenary Assembly of the World Jewish Congress in Budapest, 5 May 2013
The newly elected Jewish World Congress for 2013

–=–

From the World Jewish Congress website and its 2013 meeting in Budapest, Hungary:

Delegates also elected Baron David de Rothschild from France as the new chairman of the WJC Governing Board, which is the highest decision-making body between plenary assemblies. Chella Safra from Brazil was named as the new treasurer of the organization and will oversee the financial management of the WJC. Moshe Kantor, the president of the European Jewish Congress, was elected as chairman of the WJC Policy Council, and Mervyn Smith from South Africa will be the co-chairman. The Policy Council advises the Executive Committee on matters of policy, programming and the implementation of the mission of the World Jewish Congress.

The Plenary Assembly also changed the WJC Constitution to ensure that the sitting senior lay leaders of the 12 largest Jewish communities in the world Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Hungary, Russia, South Africa. Ukraine, United States of America) automatically have a seat on the new WJC Executive

The (2013) gathering in Budapest was notably addressed by Hungarian Prime Minister Victor Orbán, who said that “anti-Semitism today in Hungary is unacceptable, and we will show zero tolerance in regards to it.” Introducing Orbán, Ronald Lauder called on Hungary and the government to do more against growing anti-Semitism, notably coming from the extreme-right Jobbik party.

Mazsihisz President Péter Feldmájer said in his speech at the opening dinner: “I believe that the Jews of the world must unite their forces. This day also shows us that we are not alone, we are all listening to each other no matter where we may be living across the globe. The task we have is no little one to handle.

Germany’s Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle said in his keynote address on Monday, which was received with a standing ovation by the delegates: “Anti-Semitism has no place neither in Berlin, nor in Budapest, nor anywhere else in Europe or in the world… We are firmly committed to protecting and nourishing Jewish life in our societies and to countering anti-Semitism across the globe. We have to tackle the root causes of anti-Semitism.”

Discussions about effective ways to combat the rise of neo-Nazi parties in Europe took center-stage in Budapest, and the Plenary Assembly adopted a resolution which called on Hungary “to recognize that Jobbik and its subsidiaries “pose a fundamental threat to Hungary’s democracy” and that “decisive action … must now be taken to take effective measures including by enacting and enforcing legislation, for the protection of all citizens and residents of this country, in particular vulnerable minorities such as the Roma and the Jews, against threats of violence, racist hate and insults and the denial of the Holocaust.”

The WJC also urged national leaders and legislators in Europe to join the 125 legislators from more than 40 countries in signing the London Declaration on Combating Anti-Semitism.”

(Source–>http://www.worldjewishcongress.org/en/news/13476/world_jewish_congress_plenary_assembly_in_budapest)

–=–


Italy – Prime Minister Silivio Berlusconi


Italy – Prime Minister Silivio Berlusconi


Italy – Foreign Minister Gianfranco Fini


Italy – Foreign Minister Gianfranco Fini


Italian Prime Minister Mario Monti at the
Council on Foreign Relations in New York on Sept. 27.

Italy’s prime minister promised Italian Jews he would stand beside them in the fight against anti-Semitism and Holocaust denial.

“We know that anti-Semitism has not been eradicated in Europe,” Italian Prime Minister Mario Monti said at a ceremony Tuesday night marking the 69th anniversary of the World War II round-up and deportation of 1,024 Roman Jews to Auschwitz. “We will not leave you alone.”

Monti, who was joined by Rome’s mayor, several government ministers and other officials, spoke before several thousand people gathered outside Rome’s Great Synagogue to mark the anniversary. Earlier, many had taken part in a torchlight memorial march through the city.

Monti promised that the government would act against mounting racial prejudice and xenophobia in Europe.”

Source–>http://www.jewishjournal.com/world/article/italian_prime_minister_says_he_will_stand_by_countrys_jews

And you thought Italy was an Italian and Catholic nation?

“Holocaust denial” is code for people who present actual provable, historical facts that disprove the outrageous claims that 6 million Jews were placed into mythical ovens in concentration camps during World War II – or that any were cooked at all. The immediate response is to build a straw-man argument that the presenter of these facts is “anti-Semitic” thereby bypassing the facts and using ad hominem fallacy to attack the messenger instead of acknowledging the fact that cannot be dis-proven. This is a classic elicitation used by attorneys. To elicit something means the use of trickery and word magic to obtain something not due. Again, the term “Jewish” was added to the definition of Semitic last century, and so the use of that word is fallacious from the start!

What is a Semite?

  1. A member of a group of Semitic-speaking peoples of the Near East and northern Africa, including the Arabs, Arameans, Babylonians, Carthaginians, Ethiopians, Hebrews, and Phoenicians.

A Semite is defined here as of Arab and even African decent. And the Hebrews were of darker skin. Therefore, to say one is anti-Semetic would mean that one is anti-Arab, anti-Black African, and anti-Hebrew. But only in the last 100 years has this term been hijacked and used to describe a strictly anti-Jewish connotation.

The term Sephardim includes most Mizrahi Jews, and in Israel this term sometimes means any Jew who is not Ashkenazim. Sephardi Jews are of Arab decent, and many have the semblance of the Spanish people due to their historic settlement and commingling in areas inside and around Spain.

Jews who came from Eastern Europe and Russia are called Ashkenazim.

But are these people really Semetic, or just pretending?

This question is answered later in this presentation…

The name Ashkenaz was first used in the Middle Ages for Jews living along the Rhine River in northern France and western Germany. Many of these Jews later migrated eastward and formed communities in Germany, Poland, Austria, Eastern Europe and Russia between the 10th and 19th centuries. Ashkenazic Jews developed their own language, Yiddish, by combining Hebrew with German. Likewise, they developed a distinct culture by combining Jewish culture with the culture of the countries in which they lived.

The white-skinned Ashkenazim even claim anti-Semetism as a trick – an ad hominem fallacious attack on the messenger, not the message.

But don’t take my word for it, let them tell you the truth:

–=–

http://i0.wp.com/www.loonwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/koizumi_yarmulke.jpg?resize=294%2C350
Japan – Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi, Western wall

Montenegro – Prime Minister Igor Luksic


Norway – Former Prime Minister Gro-Harlem-Brundtland,
Former Brazilian President Fernando Henrique Cardoso,
Former United States President Jimmy Carter,
Former Irish President Mary Robinson,
South African Archbishop Emeritus Desmond Tutu

–=–
From Israel To Palestine And Back Again:
Radioactively
Poetic Justice
–=–

The Sunday Times front-page report published on June 19, 1977,  first revealed to the world that Israeli authorities had been torturing Palestinian prisoners, that this torture was “widespread and systematic,” and that it “appears to be sanctioned at some level as deliberate policy.” At the time Israeli officials and Jewish-Zionist leaders in the United States protested the Sunday Times revelations, and denied the charge. Later, though, Israeli torture of prisoners was independently verified by Amnesty International, and other organizations.

–=–

Israel is working on an “ethnically targeted” biological weapon that would kill or harm Arabs but not Jews, according to Israeli military and western intelligence sources cited in a front-page report in the London Sunday Times, November 15, 1998 (“Israel Planning ‘Ethnic’ Bomb as Saddam Caves In,” by Uzi Mahnaimi and Marie Colvin).

In developing this “ethno-bomb,” the British paper went on, Israeli scientists are trying to exploit medical advances by identifying distinctive genes carried by some Arabs, and then create a genetically modified bacterium or virus. The goal is to use the ability of viruses and certain bacteria to alter the DNA inside the host’s living cells. The scientists are trying to engineer deadly microorganisms that attack only those bearing the distinctive genes.

The secret Israel program is based at the Institute for Biological Research in Nes Tsiona, a small town southeast of Tel Aviv, the main research facility for Israel’s clandestine arsenal of chemical and biological weapons.

(Source–>http://ironlight.wordpress.com/2010/04/21/israels-ethno-biological-weapons/)

–=–

The price of this Jewish supremacy, racism, arrogance, lies, and torture?

Self-destruction…

As printed at the Salem-News.com:

“(TEL AVIV / SALEM) – Israel’s population is facing a dire threat: a drastic depopulation, from the use of weapons that leave behind Depleted Uranium (DU). Depleted Uranium leads to the word Omnicidal, as DU kills everything in the food chain, everywhere the wind blows. Experts say the dramatic drop in Israel’s sperm count could eliminate their ability to reproduce.

Research by an Israeli doctor shows a significant drop in sperm count level and sperm motility among young Israeli soldiers in recent years. Sperm motility is the ability of sperm to move properly toward an egg.

It is attributed to the inhalation of DU aerosolized nano-particles; the dirty results of extra powerful weapons used by Israel and the U.S.

All of that military might as it turns out, could set the stage for a massive Israeli act of population suicide.

A study by Dr. Ronit Haimov-Kokhman released in November, showed a 40-percent decline in the concentration of sperm cells in Israeli sperm donors from 2004 to 2008, compared to samples taken between 1995 and 1999.

Sperm banks in Israel are now reportedly turning away as many as two-thirds of potential donors, due to the low-quality sperm. In the past, around one-third of the potential donors were turned away…”

–=–

In the name of genocide and depopulation of the Palestinian/Arab/Semitic peoples by Zionism and Israel, including the unleashed power of the United States military as its useful idiot for which it holds the reigns, I offer my heartfelt grief, sorrow, and regret that my own people remain complacent and weak. And though I know it is my blood enemy, I am saddened at this God-sent and ironic justice being delivered upon the Ashkenazim carpetbaggers who have occupied, stolen, and killed Palestine and her people.

But we are talking about the international Jewish problem, so let’s continue with the rest of the world…

–=–

–=–


Peru – Former President Alejandro Toledo, World Jewish Congress

File:2008 World Jewish Congress Delegation meets with Polish PM Donald Tusk.jpg
Poland – World Jewish Congress Delegation meets with
Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk in Warsaw, June 2008


Poland – Prime Minister Donald Tusk at Western Wall

Donald Tusk at Wailing Wall


Poland – President Lech Kaczynski


Portugal – Jose Barrosso


European Union – Jose Barrosso is now the
appointed President of the “European Commission”
European People’s Party (EPP)


European Union – Jose Barrosso


European Parliament President Hans-Gert Poettering
with chief rabbi of Tel Aviv, Yisrael Meir Lau


European Commission President Romano Prodi


Portugal – President Aníbal Cavaco Silva, at the Lisbon synagogue


Portugal – President Jorge Sampaio, Lisbon synagogue


Russia – President Dmitry Medvedev

http://i1.wp.com/www.loonwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/putin_yarmulke.jpg?resize=340%2C311
Russian prime minister Vladimir Putin

Putin at Moscow's Jewish Museum.

–=–
Putin On Russia’s Jewish Bolshevism Government
–=–

Haaretz reports:

“Russian President Vladimir Putin said that at least 80 percent of the members of the first Soviet government were Jewish.

“I thought about something just now: The decision to nationalize this library was made by the first Soviet government, whose composition was 80-85 percent Jewish,” Putin said June 13 during a visit to Moscow’s Jewish Museum and Tolerance Center.

Putin was referencing the library of Rabbi Joseph I. Schneerson, the late leader of the Chabad-Lubavitch movement. The books, which are claimed by Chabad representatives in the United States, began being moved to the museum in Moscow this month.

According to the official transcription of Putin’s speech at the museum, he went on to say that the politicians on the predominantly Jewish Soviet government “were guided by false ideological considerations and supported the arrest and repression of Jews, Russian Orthodox Christians, Muslims and members of other faiths. They grouped everyone into the same category.

“Thankfully, those ideological goggles and faulty ideological perceptions collapsed. And today, we are essentially returning these books to the Jewish community with a happy smile.”

Widely seen as the first Soviet government, the Council of People’s Commissars was formed in 1917 and comprised 16 leaders, including chairman Vladimir Lenin, foreign affairs chief Leon Trotsky and Joseph Stalin, who was in charge of the People’s Commissariat of Nationalities.”

(Source–>http://www.haaretz.com/jewish-world/jewish-world-news/putin-first-soviet-government-was-mostly-jewish-1.530857)

–=–


Serbia – President Boris Tadic visiting Israel


South Africa – former South African President Nelson Mandela with Gill Marcus and
Professor Michael Katz, President of the South African Jewish Board of Deputies (SAJBD).
African National Congress, December 1990


South Africa – (top) Nelson Mandela and Jewish Communist leader Joe Slovo.
(bottom) – NAACP President Kivie Kaplan posing with Martin Luther King Jr.


South Africa – President Jacob Zuma meets with Irwin Cotler,
former Canadian Justice Minister and Jewish community activist.

File:JoseMariaAznarWorldJewishCongress2010.jpg
Spain – Former Spanish Prime Minister Jose Maria Aznar addressing
a meeting of the World Jewish Congress in Jerusalem, 1 September 2010


Spain – Former Prime Minister (1996 to 2004) José María Aznar
attends a meeting of the World Jewish Congress in Israel 2010


Spain – José María Aznar at pro-Israeli lobby group AIPAC


Sweden – Prime Minister Göran Persson


Sweden – Prime Minister Göran Persson


Tibet – Buddhist chief Dalai Lama at Wailing Wall

Tibet – Dalai Lama


United Kindom – Foreign Minister David Miliband


United Kingdom – Jewish Foreign Minister David Miliband


UK – Prime Minister David Cameron in Yad Vashem, Israel


United Kingdom – Prime Minister Tony Blair

File:Tony Blair - Jerusalem - June 2011.jpg
International Quartet Envoy and former British Prime Minister Tony Blair
addressing a gathering of the World Jewish Congress in Jerusalem

http://i0.wp.com/www.loonwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/brown_yarmulke.jpg?resize=253%2C400
United Kingdom – Prime Ministers Tony Blair, Gordon Brown


United Kingdom – Prime Minister Gordon Brown in Yad Vashem, Israel


United Nations – Secretary-General Kofi Annan and his wife Nane
(from the Swedish Wallenberg Jewish finance family)


United States
(See Below)


Venezuela – President Hugo Chavez

–=–
The Vatican
–=–


Vatican City
Catholic???


Pope Benedict XVI at the Wailing Wall


Vatican – Pope Benedict XVI Ratzinger


Pope John Paul II at the Wailing Wall


Vatican – Pope John Paul II


Vatican – Pope John Paul II


Pope Benedict XVI Ratzinger

File:1993 Maria Celli-Riegner-Beilin-Vatican-Israel-Relations.jpg
World Jewish Congress leader Gerhart M. Riegner (center) witnesses formal
establishment of diplomatic relations between the Holy See, represented by
Monsignor Claudio Maria Celli (left), and Israel, represented by
Deputy Foreign Minister Yossi Beilin.


Pope John Paul II visits Yad Vashem Holocaust Centre in Israel

https://i0.wp.com/media.israelhayom.co.il/2011/10/02/131754913679963684a_b.jpg
Rabbi Yisrael Meir Lau, chief rabbi of Tel Aviv
A.K.A. “Everybody’s Rabbi”


France – Jewish Cardinal Aaron Jean-Marie Lustiger embracing Rabbi Sirat


Evangelical leader Pat Robertson delivers a speech to a crowd of mostly
evangelical Christians from various nations on a pilgrimage to Israel, 2004.

–=–

–=–

***A Note to Christians***

If ever there was or will be an “anti-Christ” (not to mention one that loves to brag about its responsibility in killing Christ and that He is now boiling in excrement in some place like hell), it is surely right before your eyes – in the form of the international organized Zionist Jew. Isn’t it time to become Christian soldiers and defeat this biblical enemy instead of becoming Friends Of Israel and part of the Christian/Jewish Alliance? How can total and complete enemies be in such an unholy partnership? The Holy Bible is full of violence, which I was fooled into thinking was all a bad thing thanks to Jewish manipulation. Now I realize that it is time for Christians to take the lessons and allegory of the Bible to heart, for violence is a natural biblical response to the purposeful destruction of your species, your values, your families, and your way of life. Will you truly allow the Synagogue of Satan – less than 2% of the U.S. population – to rule you and demoralize and murder your children without a fight?

Jewish comedy at your expense…
They are laughing at you and your “other cheek”.

–=–
The United States
Corruption At all levels
–=–

Video: 300 U.S. Congressmen sign pledge of Allegiance to Israel

Video: Cynthia McKinney refuses to sign a pledge to Israel…
is politically ostracized, redistricted, and loses her office

–=–
The Presidents
–=–


Must Watch Video:
The quad-annual migration of presidential candidates to Israel

–=–

“While only a tiny proportion of the US population is Jewish,
94(%) of Jews live in 13 key electoral college states,
which combined have enough electors to elect the president.”
–World Jewish Congress
(Source–>http://www.worldjewishcongress.org/en/communities/show?id=72)

–=–


President Obama (2009-2017?)


President Obama at the Wailing Wall


President Obama at Yad Vashem, Israel

Bush at the Wailing Wall


President George W. Bush

President Bill Clinton (1993-2001)


Bill and Hillary

–=–

“We Jews have put issue upon issue to the American people.
Then we promote both sides of the issue as confusion reigns.
With their eye’s fixed on the issues, they fail to see who is behind every scene.
We Jews toy with the American public as a cat toys with a mouse…”
“Americans have not had a presidential choice since 1932.
Roosevelt was our man; every president since Roosevelt has been our man.”

– (Harold Wallace Rosenthal)

Roosevelt Labor's ChoiceAn issue of the Yiddish socialist daily, the Forward, endorsed Roosevelt
on the cover of its November 1, 1936, rotogravure section.
In 1936, Roosevelt garnered 85 percent of the Jewish vote.
Note the support of the Jewish run “Labor” unions.

Stop Your Cruel Oppression of the Jews
“In this print, which appeared after a 1905 pogrom in Kishinev, a “Russian Jew” carries on his back a large bundle labeled “Oppression;” hanging from the bundle are weights labeled “Autocracy,” “Robbery,” “Cruelty,” “Assassination,” “Deception,” and “Murder.” In the background, on the right, a Jewish community burns, while in the upper left corner, President Theodore Roosevelt asks the Emperor of Russia, Nicholas II, “Now that you have peace without, why not remove his burden and have peace within your borders?”
(Source–>http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/haventohome/haven-home.html)

Giant Mass Meeting sponsored by the Trade Union Council and New York City Committee of the Jewish People, September 18, 1941
The dual-sided English-Yiddish broadside – rally supporting President Franklin Roosevelt
and his “policy of all aid to Great Britain, the Soviet Union, and China,” in 1941,
sponsored by the Jewish Peoples Committee, a pro-communist organization.
David Dubinsky, president of the International Ladies Garment Union, declined to attend this
September 18, 1941, rally because he viewed the sponsoring group as Communist controlled.
(Source–>http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/haventohome/haven-home.html)

https://i0.wp.com/www.loc.gov/exhibits/haventohome/images/hh0170s.jpg
Hebrew Prayer for Roosevelt and Churchill
This hand-drawn plaque includes dual Hebrew prayers for Winston Churchill and
Franklin Roosevelt.  The one for Roosevelt, based on the traditional Jewish prayer
for the government, reads: “[May He] who gives salvation to President Roosevelt,
[He] whose kingdom is everlasting, protect, and increase, and raise up all of the officials
of America, and [may] the King of Kings lift them up and lengthen their days in office.”


“V for Vendetta” was a Jewish creation with Jewish writers and actors
that promotes the false paradigm of a vendetta for the holocaust,
as most movies do.


Zionist Congress: Join the British Army for Victory.
(Translated) “We will fight them where-ever we meet them, and we will hit them
Hard and Often, until this scourge is driven from the Earth” –Sir Winston Churchill.
Unite with the British to defeat the Nazis. Jewish enlisting is important
in giving the support of the Zionists in the Jewish Agency.

File:V-E-Day Stars and Stripes No 285 Paris 8 May 1945.JPG
This is the real Ashkenazim V for Victory, commonly called VE-Day
(Victory in Europe Day)

–=–

Note that Roosevelt and Churchhill (and all past U.S. Presidents and Prime Ministers)
are royal blood cousins with the Kings and Queens of England;
here genealogically chronicled by the Mormon “Church” :
https://realitybloger.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/3ee75-howlandpedigree.jpg

–=–
Abraham Lincoln-stein
–=–

Isachar Zacharie (1827-1900) to Abraham Lincoln
“English born Isachar Zacharie was President Lincoln’s chiropodist, political confidante, and special emissary. Among other things, Zacharie involved himself in helping Abraham Lincoln secure the Jewish vote. In a letter to Lincoln on November 3, 1864, Zacharie wrote: “I just returned to this city after a trip of nine days through Pennsylvania and New York state, and I am happy to inform you, that I am satisfied that I have done much good, I now think all is Right . . . . As regards the Isrelites [sic]–with but few Exceptions, they will vote for you. . . . I understand them well, and have taken the precaution–to see that they do as they have promised–I have secured good and trustworthy men to–attend on them on Election Day–My Men have been all the week seeing that their masses are properly Registered–so that all will go right on the 8th ins.”

(Source–>http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/haventohome/haven-home.html)

–=–

“Lincoln was the first President to make it possible for rabbis to serve as military chaplains by signing the 1862 Act of Congress which changed the law that had barred all but Christian clergymen from the role. It all started on September 8, 1861, when a 30-year-old Philadelphia cantor, Michael Mitchell Allen, returned to his encampment with the 65th Regiment of the Fifth Pennsylvania Cavalry, known as Cameron’s Dragoons. The regiment of 1,200 men, mostly Jews, elected him their chaplain. Complaints flew up the military ladder. Lincoln, then signed the Act, and Jewish chaplains have been serving in the American Armed Forces ever since.

He was also the first, and happily, the only President who was called upon to revoke an official act of anti-Semitism by the U.S. government. He canceled General Ulysses S Grant’s “Order No. 11” expelling all Jews from Tennessee from the district controlled by his armies during the Civil War. (Grant denied personal responsibility for this act attributing it to his subordinate.)

Shortly after delivering the Emancipation Proclamation, Lincoln met Canadian Christian Zionist, Henry Wentworth Monk, who expressed hope that Jews who were being oppressed in Russia and Turkey be emancipated “by restoring them to their national home in Palestine.” Lincoln replied this was “a noble dream and one shared by many Americans.”…

In his study of American Jewry and the Civil War (Philadelphia, 1951), Bertram W. Korn writes that in the eulogy Rabbi Isaac M. Wise delivered after Lincoln’s assassination, he said: “The lamented Abraham Lincoln believed himself to be bone from our bone and flesh from our flesh. He supposed himself to be a descendant of Hebrew parentage. He said so in my presence.”

Ever since, speculation has been rife. Google “Abraham Lincoln Jewish” and a plethora of articles appear…

The “Case for Jewish Lincoln”:

1. His close friendships with prominent Jews, along with his pro-Jewish policies.

2. While Lincoln never professed belonging to a specific faith, he would often refer to his beliefs citing the 20th chapter of the Book of Exodus – the Ten Commandments.

3. His name was Abraham. His great-grandfather was named Mordechai.

4. His ancestors came from the town of Lincoln in eastern England, established in 1159, it has an interesting Jewish history. During Crusader riots, the Sheriff of Lincoln and the Bishop of London saved the Jews by giving them official protection and taught love of Jews to parishioners. It’s been postulated that when the Jews were ordered out of England, Abraham Lincoln’s ancestors may have been Conversos.

5. When Lincoln was assassinated, Jewish communities sat Shiva. Rabbis around the country eulogized the fallen President.

6. Lincoln was described as having Sephardic features.”

(Source–>http://www.aish.com/j/f/Abraham_Lincoln_and_the_Jews.html)

–=–

“The Melungeon DNA Surname Project by Dr. Elizabeth Hirschman and Dr. Donald Panther Yates state that Abraham Lincoln was of Jewish ancestry. Dr. Hirschman writes “The DNA sample we have came from a Berry male from Tennessee whose ancestors had arrived in Virginia. The marriage of Abraham Lincoln’s parents was performed in the home of a Berry (and not a church) suggesting that not only the Lincolns, but also the Berry’s were of Jewish descent. We believe that many of the very earliest settlers who came to North America from England were actually Sephardic Jews.”

(Source–>http://www.melungeons.com/articles/mar2005.htm)

–=–

This presents an interesting dilemma, as again we must acknowledge the bloodline lineage of all presidents as cousins of George Washington. Abraham Lincoln is listed, among others, as:

7th cousin, 7 times removed from Barack Obama
7th cousin, 5 times removed from George W. Bush
7th cousin 4 times removed from Gerald Ford
11th cousin, 3 times removed from Mitt Romney
13th cousin 3 times removed from George Washington
14th cousin 2 times removed from Robert E. Lee
14th cousin 5 times removed from Thomas Jefferson
15th cousin 4 times removed from William Henry Harrison via Edward I King of England
17th cousin 2 times removed from John Quincy Adams via Edward I King of England
17th cousin 2 times removed from Benjamin Harrison via Edward I King of England
18th cousin 1 time removed from Theodore Roosevelt via Edward I King of England
19th cousin from Franklin Roosevelt via Edward I King of England
20th cousin from John Forbes Kerry
31st great-grandson of Alfred The Great (King of the Anglo-Saxons)
34th great-grandson of Emperor Charlemagne

“According to Burke’s Presidential Families of the United States, Abraham Lincoln is a direct descendant of King Edward I Plantagenet (1239-1307) of England… The genealogical chart shown below traces Lincoln’s line from Edward I (top left) down through Lincoln’s mother, Nancy [Hanks] Lincoln (1784-1818), a family that had its American beginnings in the Philadelphia area but later migrated to Virginia and Kentucky… the aforementioned book… describes other interesting royal connections to American presidents – namely, George Washington as descended from King Henry III (1207-1272); George Washington from King Edward I (1239-1307); Thomas Jefferson from David I, King of Scott (1080-1153); James Monroe from Edward III (1312-1377); John Quincy Adams from Edward I (1239-1307); Ulysses Grant from David I, King of Scots (1080-1153); and, although he was not a president, the genealogical connection of Robert E. Lee to Queen Elizabeth II.  There is also a connection with a more recent president, Richard M. Nixon, and King Edward III, although in that case, the claim goes through an “illegitimate” (but “biological”) offspring, Eleanor Holland, who was born around 1405… Abraham Lincoln can not only be connected as a cousin to the aforementioned presidents and Robert E. Lee, but also to Queen Victoria…”

Remember the chart above listing the Kingdom of Jerusalem as a Plantagenet family claim?

–=–

Abraham LincolnTom Hanks
Lincoln was born on February 12, 1809 to Thomas Lincoln and Nancy Hanks.
Tom Hanks is of the bloodline as most prominent actors are,
being 3rd cousin, 4 times removed of Abe Lincoln.

–=–

According to Ancestry.com, George Clooney is the half-first cousin five times removed from Lincoln, the 16th president. The genealogy website breaks down the connection, explaining the “half” means that two of their ancestors were half-siblings –  Lincoln’s mother Nancy Hanks was the half-sister of Clooney’s 4th great-grandmother Mary Ann Sparrow.

And Hollywood continues to promote a Jewish historical perspective without ever revealing this inconvenient genealogical relationship of its actors turned directors and writers. Steven Spielberg’s new movie Lincoln, for example, should be watched or re-watched with these facts in mind…

So at what point do we distinguish the royal blood from the Ashkenazim “Jewish” blood? Can it be distinguished, if most actors, presidents, congressmen, Supreme Court justices, and corporate CEO’s and founders are labeled as both cousins of royal blood and as “Jewish”? Is it not clear this the distinction is not racial or religious, but must be considered as blood-based? A shared psychopathic blood without the imposition of empathy – one blood to rule them all…

Sources:

http://www.familyforest.com/Kerry_Bush_Cousins.html
http://usspost.com/abraham-lincoln-seventh-cousin-five-times-removed-george-w-bush-69662/
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2207331/How-Tom-Hanks-related-Abraham-Lincoln-presidents-mother.html
http://famouskin.com/_abraham_lincoln_famous_kin.php
http://civilwar.gratzpa.org/2012/12/best-of-2012-the-royal-ancestry-of-president-abraham-lincoln/

–=–

https://i1.wp.com/www.loc.gov/exhibits/haventohome/images/hh0196s.jpg
President Grant Makes a Contribution to Congregation Adas Israel

Adas Israel was the first synagogue building built in the District of Columbia and is closely linked with the beginnings of Jewish life in Washington. President Ulysses S. Grant and other federal and civic officials attended the dedication ceremony on June 9, 1876. Shown here is an official receipt from the Adas Israel “Hebrew” Congregation to the president acknowledging his ten-dollar contribution. In 1969, to make way for Washington’s subway, the first Adas Israel building (which had not functioned as a synagogue since 1907), was moved from its original location at 6th and G Street, N.W., to 3rd and G Street, N.W., where it currently houses the Lillian and Albert Small Jewish Museum and the Jewish Historical Society of Greater Washington.

–=–
The Vice Presidents
–=–


Vice President Joe Biden

“You make up 11 percent of the seats in the United States Congress. You make up one-third of all Nobel laureates… The embrace of immigration” is part of that, as is the involvement of Jews in social justice movements… You can’t talk about the civil rights movement in this country without talking about Jewish freedom riders and Jack Greenberg,” he said, telling a story about seeing a group of Jewish activists at a segregated movie theater in Delaware. “You can’t talk about the women’s movement without talking about Betty Friedan” or American advances in science and technology without mentioning Einstein and Carl Sagan, or music and Gershwin, Bob Dylan and “so, so, so many other people…Think behind of all that, I bet you 85 percent of those changes, whether it’s in Hollywood or social media are a consequence of Jewish leaders in the industry. The influence is immense, the influence is immense. And, I might add, it is all to the good… Jews have also been key to the evolution of American jurisprudence, he continued, namedropping Brandeis, Fortas, Frankfurter, Cardozo, Ginsberg, Breyer, Kagan. You literally can’t. You can’t talk about the recognition of… rights in the Constitution without looking at these incredible jurists that we’ve had.”

–Vice President Joe Biden’s speech for Jewish Heritage Month,
which concerned some Jews as too historically honest


Vice President Joe Biden


Joe Biden with Israeli presidents Netanyahu and Peres


Former Vice President Dick Cheney with Lubavitchers.

–=–
The Executive Cabinet
–=–

Former White House Chief of Staff Rahm (Israel) Emanuel
Now Mayor of Chicago… Always a duel-Israeli/U.S. citizen


Hillary Clinton – First Lady, Senator, and Cheif of Staff


U.S. Chief of Staff Joshua Bolten,


Former U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Stuart Eizenstat

–=–
The Governors
–=–

Governor Jeb Bush (Florida)
meets with Zionist Lubavitch Movement

Governor Mit Romney (Massachusetts)
And at the Wailing wall below

Governor George Pataki (New York), Lubavitcher “Award” ceremony.
by picture of the ultra-racist “Rebbe” [i.e. “Teacher”] in the background).
Also speaking: Hillary Clinton
Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger (California)

Governor Rod Blagojevich flanked by Members of the
Jewish Supremacist Lubavitch Movement

Governor Mike Huckabee with Israeli P.M. Netanyahu
–=–
The Mayors
–=–

“By July, The Three Biggest U.S. Cities Will Have Jewish Mayors”

–Tablet Magazine, May 22, 2013


New Los Angeles Jewish Mayor Eric Garcetti debating on the
Jewish media against a ‘goy’. Hardly seems fair…


Los Angeles Mayor-elect Eric Garcetti attended Beth Chayim Chadashim’s (BCC)
annual awards brunch on June 2 and presented the 2013 Rabbi Erwin and
Agnes Herman Humanitarian Award to BCC honoree David Codell.


Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg (New York)


Former Mayor Giuliani celebrating the Rebbe’ Schneerson


Mayor of New York, Ed Koch meeting with racist Rebbe

Bob Filner on Election Night.
Bob Filner, Jewish Mayor of San Diego


Raum Emanuel, Mayor of Chicago
Former Obama Chief of Staff
Duel citizen of Israel

–=–
The Congress
–=–

 “If Democrats take the House, we’re going to see a huge influx” of Jewish lawmakers,
said Ira Forman, the executive director of the National Jewish Democratic Council.
‘But even on a disappointing night, I think we’ll see a few more Jewish Democrats in the House.’
(Source: http://forward.com/articles/4693/a-tribe-of-candidates-leads-drive-to-retake-house/)

https://i2.wp.com/www.loc.gov/exhibits/haventohome/images/hh0167b_p1s.jpg
“Displayed here are a variety of buttons, stickers, and other election related memorabilia
offering a snapshot of Jewish participation in the political process as members of Congress.”


Senator McCain at the Wailing Wall


Senator Joseph Lieberman with award from “Friends of Lubavitch”


House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer (Left) and
House Speaker John Boehner (Right) with chabads.


Newt Gingrich


Congressman Newt Gingrich, Speaker of the U.S. House

–=–
The Middle Management
–=–

I could go on and on and on but…

–=–
Oh Wait!
We forgot Iran…

–=–

Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (R) speaks as Rabbi Moshe Ber Beck of
Neturei Karta, a fringe Ultra-Orthodox movement within the anti-Zionist bloc,
listens during a meeting in New York, September 24, 2008.
REUTERS/Brendan McDermid (UNITED STATES)


Anti-Zionist Orthodox Jewish Rabbis meet with Irans President Ahmadinejad, 2006

https://i0.wp.com/www.vosizneias.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/ahm6-725x520.jpg

A rabbi from the fringe group Jews United Against Zionism embraces Iranian President and Holocaust denier Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
Rabbi Yisroel Dovid Weiss, anti-Zionist leader of Netrurei Karta

“Why on earth would a rabbi from New York travel to Tehran to embrace
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, a man who says
the Holocaust never happened and that Israel should be annihilated?”
–Fox News article, 2006

The answer?

Rabbi Yisroel Dovid Weiss led the Neturei Karta (New York) delegation
to Iran’s capital on Dec. 11 to participate in a two-day
conference on whether the Holocaust occurred.

–=–

“Zionism is a fundamentally heretical movement which
denies the Divine imperative
that Jews remain in exile until the day
when all mankind will be miraculously redeemed…”

–Weiss told a gathering of protesters in New York City in November, 2006.


Ahmadinejad attends the International Conference on
Global Alliance against Terrorism for a Just Peace in Iran
May 14th, 2011

–=–

Anti-Zionist?

Ahhh… no wonder Iran is on the international Jew and Israel’s shit list!

For Zionism is the blind support of the illegal State of Israel…

–=–

Iranian vice president Mohammad Reza Rahimi publicly stated that
the Talmud teaches how to destroy non-Jews and that
80% of America’s wealth is in the hands of 6% of the world’s Jewish population.

–=–

President of Iran Ahmadinejad meets Jewish Rabbis in NYC, September 2012.

–=–

“There is today a lot of oppression, which a large portion of this is due
to the Zionist. The occupying of Palestine is just a part of this injustice.
But the bigger wrong  is that they are calling themselves Jews and
they justify their horrendous actions  in the name of Judaism”.

–Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
, to anti-Zionist Rabbi Beck
In New York City, September 27, 2012

–=–

“We  are impressed with Your Excellency’s concern and care for the
Jewish community,  a fact that we personally have experienced during our visits in Iran.
We have  visited the Jewish old-age home, the Jewish hospital and we have seen
the Matzo bakery which is a necessity for Jewish people. Also it is well-known that the
Jewish community is represented by its own member of parliament, despite the fact that
the Jewish community does not have the number of constituents
required to have a parliament representative.”

–Senior Rabbi Moshe Dov Beck to Ahmadinejad,
–In New York City, September 27, 2012

–=–

Amongst the issues discussed, the Rabbi stated: “There are many many Jews  worldwide including in occupied Palestine, who are against the whole concept of Zionism and totally in opposition to the State of Israel”. The  rabbi praised the President for his understanding the difference between  Judaism and Zionism. “We  would like to laud Your Excellency for understanding to differentiate between Judaism and Zionism, between good and evil.”

–Senior Rabbi Moshe Dov Beck to Ahmadinejad,
–New York, September 27, 2012

–=–
So Who’s Jew?
–=–

“These Eastern European Jews have neither a racial nor a historic connection
with Palestine. Their ancestors were not inhabitants of the Promised Land.
They are the direct descendants of the people of the Khazar Kingdom.
The Khazars were a non-Semitic, Turko-Mongolian tribe.”

–Mr. Benjamin Freedman, a Jewish industrialist born in New York,

from Economic Council Letter published October 15, 1947

–=–

“Mr. Freedman was challenged, unwisely, by a Zionist objector;
he invited his challenger to go with him to the Jewish room
of the New York Public Library. There they could together examine the
Jewish Encyclopedia volume I pp. 1-12, and the published works of
Graetz, Dubnow, Friedlander, Raisin and many other noted Jewish historians,
which, as well as other non-Jewish authorities,
“establish the fact beyond all possible doubt”.’

–Somewhere South of Suez (1950) Pg 349-350

–=–

“Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a ‘Jew’
or to call a contemporary Jew an Israelite or a Hebrew.”

— “A brief History of the Terms for Jew”, 1980 Jewish Almanac, page 3

–=–

“Khazar, an ancient Turkic speaking people who ruled a large and powerful
state in the steppes North of the Caucasus Mountains from the 7th century
to their demise in the mid 11th century A.D… In the 8th Century it’s
political and religious head… as well as the greater part of the Khazar nobility,
abandoned paganism and converted to Judaism… .”

Encyclopedia Americana (1985)

–=–

“Khazars, confederation of Turkic and Iranian tribes that established a
major commercial empire in the second half of the 6th century,
covering the southeastern section of modern European Russia… |
In the middle of the 8th century the ruling classes adopted Judaism as their religion.”

–Encyclopedia Britannica (15th edition)

–=–

 “Khazars, a non-Semitic, Asiatic, Mongolian tribal nation who emigrated into
Eastern Europe about the first century, who were converted as an entire nation to
Judaism in the seventh century by the expanding Russian nation
which absorbed the entire Khazar population, and who account for the
presence in Eastern Europe of the great numbers of Yiddish-speaking
Jews in Russia, Poland, Lithuania, Galatia, Besserabia and Rumania.”

–The Jewish Encyclopedia

–=–

 “Khazars, a national group of general Turkic type, independent and sovereign in
Eastern Europe between the seventh and tenth centuries C.E.
During part of this time the leading Khazars professed Judaism…
In spite of the negligible information of an archaeological nature,
the presence of Jewish groups and the impact of Jewish ideas in Eastern Europe
are considerable during the Middle Ages. Groups have been mentioned as migrating
to Central Europe from the East often have been referred to as Khazars,
thus making it impossible to overlook the possibility that they originated
from within the former Khazar Empire.”

–The Encyclopedia Judaica (1972)

–=–

“Ashkenazim, the Ashkenazim are one of the two major
divisions of the Jews, the other being the Shephardim.”

–Academic American Encyclopedia (1985)

–=–

“Ashkenazim, the Ashkenazim are the Jews whose ancestors lived in
German lands… it was among Ashkenazi Jews that the idea of political Zionism
emerged, leading ultimately to the establishment of the state of Israel…
In the late 1960s, Ashkenazi Jews numbered some 11 million,
about 84 percent of the world Jewish population.”

–Encyclopedia Americana (1985)

–=–

 “The primary meaning of Ashkenaz and Ashkenazim in Hebrew is
Germany and Germans. This may be due to the fact that the home of
the ancient ancestors of the Germans is Media, which is the Biblical Ashkenaz…
Krauss is of the opinion that in the early medieval ages
the Khazars were sometimes referred to as Ashkenazim…
About 92 percent of all Jews or approximately 14,500,000 are Ashkenazim.”

–The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia

–=–

Khazars {kah’z-ars} The Khazars, a Turkic people, created a commercial and
political empire that dominated substantial parts of South Russia during much of
the 7th through 10th centuries. During the 8th century the Khazar aristocracy and the
kagan (king) were converted to Judaism. The Khazars established their capital at
Itil (or Atil), in the Volga delta, and for four centuries thereafter this Jewish empire held
the balance of power between the Christian Byzantine Empire and the Muslim Caliphate.
The fortified Khazar city of Sarkil on the lower Don River was built with Byzantine help
and served as a crossroads to central Asia. The Khazars controlled many of the trade
routes to the Orient; some of the Radhanites (Jewish merchants from Gaul), for example,
were accustomed to crossing the Khazar empire while traveling to and from China and
India. During the late 10th and early 11th centuries an alliance of Byzantines and
Russians broke the power of the Khazars in the Crimea. In 965, Svyatoslav I,
duke  of Kiev, decisively defeated the Khazar army. Further to the east new
waves of Turkic invadersoverran the remains of the Khazar state.

–New Grolier Encyclopedia

–=–

“It is highly probable that the bulk of the Jew’s ancestors ‘never’ lived in
Palestine ‘at all,’ which witnesses the power of historical assertion over fact.”

–‘The Outline of History’ by H. G. Wells:

–=–

“Now these are the generations of the sons of Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth: and unto
them were sons born after the flood. The sons of Japheth;…the sons of Gomer; Ashkenaz…”

–The Bible (Genesis 10:1-3)

–=–

“Without a complete and accurate knowledge of the origin and history of the
‘Jews’ in Eastern Europe… it is quite impossible for [Christians] to intelligently
understand the harmful influence the Jews have exerted for ten centuries…’
My many years of intensive research established beyond the question of any doubt,
contrary to the generally accepted belief held by Christians, that the ‘Jews’ in
Eastern Europe at any time in their history in Eastern Europe were never the
legendary ‘lost ten tribes’ of Bible lore. That historic fact is incontrovertible.
Relentless research established as equally true that the ‘Jews’ in Eastern Europe
at no time in their history could be correctly regarded as the direct lineal descendants
of the legendary ‘lost ten tribes’ of Bible lore. The ‘Jews’ in Eastern Europe in modern
history cannot legitimately point to a single ancient ancestor who ever
set even a foot on the soil of Palestine in the era of Bible history…
Research also revealed that the ‘Jews’ in Eastern Europe were never ‘Semites,’
are not ‘Semites’ now, nor can they ever be regarded as ‘Semites’ at any future time
by any stretch of the imagination. Exhaustive research also irrevocably rejects as a
fantastic fabrication the generally accepted belief by Christians that the ‘Jews’ in
Eastern Europe are the legendary ‘Chosen People’ so very vocally publicized
by the Christian clergy from their pulpits…”

–‘Facts Are Facts’, by Benjamin Freedman

–=–

“In the year 740 A.D. the Khazars were officially converted to Judaism.
A century later they were crushed by the incoming Slavic-speaking people and
were scattered over central Europe where they were known as Jews.”

–The American Peoples Encyclopedia, 1954

–=–

“Chazars [Khazars]: A people of Turkish origin whose life and history are interwoven
with the very beginnings of the history of the Jews of Russia. The kingdom of the
Chazars was firmly established in most of South Russia long before the foundation
of the Russian monarchy by the Varangians (855)…
Jews have lived on the shores of the Black and Caspian seas since the first centuries
of the common era [after the death of Christ]. Historical evidence points to the region
of the Ural as the home of the Chazars. Among the classical writers of the Middle Ages
they were known as the ‘Chozars,’ ‘Khazirs,’ ‘Akatzirs,’ and ‘Akatirs,’ and in the
Russian chronicles as ‘Khwalisses’ and ‘Ugry Byelyye.’…”

Jewish Encyclopedia, 3rd Edition, 1925

–=–

“Khazars, a national group of general Turkic type, independent and sovereign in
Eastern Europe between the seventh and tenth centuries A.D.
During part of this time the leading Khazars professed Judaism.”

–The Encyclopedia Judaica, Vol. 10, (1971)

–=–

“Khazars, a medieval people, probably related to the VolgaBulgars, whose
ruling class adopted Judaism during the 8th cent. The Khazars seem to have
emerged during the 6th cent., from the vast nomadic Hun (Turki) empire which
stretched from the steppes of Eastern Europe and the Volga basin to the Chinese frontier.
Although it is often claimed that allusions to the Khazars are found as early as 200 C.E.,
actually they are not mentioned until 627… Most Jewish Historians date the
conversion of the Khazar King to Judaism during the first half of this century {A.D.}…”

–The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia

–=–

“This, of course, is inspired by the story of the Covenant in Genesis; and it implies
that the Khazars too claimed the status of a Chosen Race, who made their own Covenant
with the Lord, even though they [Khazars] were not descended from Abraham’s seed…
He cannot, and does not, claim for them [the Khazars] Semitic descent, he traces their
[Khazars] ancestry not to Shem, but to Noah’s third son, Japheth or more precisely
to Japheth’s grandson, Togarma, the ancestor of all Turkish tribes…
We have found in the family registers of our fathers,’ Joseph asserts boldly,
‘that Togarma had ten sons, and the names of their offspring are as follows:
Uigur, Dursu, Avars, Huns, Basilii, Tarniakh, Khazars, Zagora, Bulgars, Sabir.
We [Khazars] are the sons of Khazar, the seventh…'”

–The Thirteenth Tribe, (Jewish author) Arthur Koestler, pages 58-82

–=–

(Source for some of the above quotes–>http://www.iamthewitness.com/doc/Ashkenazis.are.not.the.descendants.of.the.Ancient.Israelites.htm)

–=–

Just in Europe and Russia alone, the (Khazarian) Zionist Jews have been banished over 47 times in the last 1000 years (not including this last century):

Mainz, 1012 – France, 1182 – Upper Bavaria, 1276 – England, 1290 – France, 1306 – France, 1322 – Saxony, 1349 – Hungary, 1360 – Belgium, 1370 – Slovakia, 1380 – France, 1394 – Austria, 1420 – Lyons, 1420 – Cologne, 1424 – Mainz, 1438 – Augsburg, 1438 – Upper Bavaria, 1442 – Netherlands, 1444 – Brandenburg, 1446 – Mainz, 1462 – Mainz, 1483 – Warsaw, 1483 – Spain, 1492 – Italy, 1492 – Lithuania, 1495 – Portugal, 1496 – Naples, 1496 – Navarre, 1498 – Nuremberg, 1498 – Brandenburg, 1510 – Prussia, 1510 – Genoa, 1515 – Naples, 1533 – Italy, 1540 – Naples, 1541 – Prague, 1541 – Genoa, 1550 – Bavaria, 1551 – Prague, 1557 – Papal States, 1569 – Hungary, 1582 – Hamburg, 1649 – Vienna, 1669 – Slovakia, 1744 –  Moravia, 1744 – Bohemia, 1744 – Moscow, 1891.

—Excerpted from “The Synagogue of Satan” by Andrew Carrington Hitchcock. This was not the end, as we all know from recent history.

–=–

“It can hardly be an accident that antagonism directed against the Jews is to be found pretty much everywhere in the world where Jews and non-Jews are associated. And as the Jews are the common element of the situation it would seem probable, on the face of it, that the cause will be found in them rather than in the widely varying groups which feel this antagonism.”

Professor Jesse H. Holmes, writing in “The American Hebrew”.

–=–

“If this hostility, even aversion, had only been shown towards the Jews at one period and in one country, it would be easy to unravel the limited causes of this anger, but this race has been on the contrary an object of hatred to all the peoples among whom it has established itself. It must be therefore, since the enemies of the Jews belonged to the most diverse races, since they lived in countries very distant from each other; since they were ruled by very different laws, governed by opposite principles, since they had neither the same morals, nor the same customs, since they were animated by unlike dispositions which did not permit them to judge of anything in the same way, it must be therefore that the general cause of anti-Semitism has always resided in Israel itself and not in those who have fought against Israel.”

—Bernard Lazare, noted Jewish author, from his book “L’antisemitisme son histoire et ses causes”, published in 1894, regarding the history of the expulsions of Jews from so many cultures.

–=–
Zionism and Patriotism
–=–

https://i2.wp.com/www.loc.gov/exhibits/haventohome/images/hh0243s.jpg

“A successful lawyer, Louis D. Brandeis (1856-1941) became active in the nascent American Zionist movement on the eve of World War I. In 1914, he became chair of the Provisional Executive Committee for General Zionist Affairs, the leader of American Zionism. His participation served to legitimize the movement in the eyes of American Jewry and other Americans. He believed strongly that Zionism and American patriotism were compatible, a view expressed in the pamphlet displayed here. In 1916, Louis Brandeis became the Supreme Court’s first Jewish justice.

Today, statism, nationalism, and patriotism are socialist/fascist tools used to blindly trick the people into romanticizing about a country called America that somehow still exists with eminent constitutional intent – one that will somehow be taken back through non-violent begging. In my future essay, we will learn that America was never the people’s country in the first place, and that there is nothing to take back!

–=–

“Beware the leader who bangs the drums of war in order to whip the citizenry into a patriotic fervor, for patriotism is indeed a double-edged sword. It both emboldens the blood, just as it narrows the mind. And when the drums of war have reached a fever pitch and the blood boils with hate and the mind has closed, the leader will have no need in seizing the rights of the citizenry. Rather, the citizenry, infused with fear and blinded by patriotism, will offer up all of their rights unto the leader and gladly so. How do I know? For this is what I have done. And I am Caesar.”

–Julius Caesar

–=–

These poor demonized outcasts try to warn the people of the world,
even as the world governments all defend Israel to the death…

http://www.nkusa.org/activities/demonstrations/israeliflag.cfm
Anti-Zionism is anti-Israel… here Jews burn the Israeli flag

https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-gJAYVVB0pKs/UGbUElB_NcI/AAAAAAAAK2Y/LWp_Bjjrlhk/s800/250px-Members_of_Neturei_Karta_Orthodox_Jewish_group_protest_against_Israel.jpg

–=–
For those who have eyes to see, let them see,
and for those who have ears to hear, let them hear.
–=–

We stand on the threshold of a cultural genocide that targets all members of the human race. As the Talmud and Protocols teach, this effort must be done covertly and most importantly incrementally so as to be mostly unseen by the goy (non-Jew).

With this understanding and comprehension, it should be obvious that peace can be accomplished in the world only through the expulsion of this minority from the governments and seats of authority of the world. Authority is nothing more than permission of the people. And with the understanding that law requires force, the nations of the world had best force the international Jew out of their governments before their strength in numbers are lulled into insignificance.

This effort must be universal, for the powers of all nations rest in their hands. The price for resistance is historically evident in the outcome of World War 1 and 2. The power of this Masonic League of Nations now called the United Nations are united to further the Zionist cause, against the informed consent and interests of the people of each individual nation. The peacekeeping forces of the United Jewish Nations are the armies of all usurped nations under Jewish rule and influence. And so individually and with individual sovereignty, the people of those nations must rise together for the common cause of expelling this enemy of all people.

A lofty goal indeed for a world masterfully entertained and brainwashed by the very entity that enslaves them and tells them they are liberated and have freedom…

Of course the legal definition of freedom is “to obey the law”!!!

This blind patriotism and nationalism creates masses of mindless adherants to an obviously lawless set of international Jewish lawmakers.

–=–

Stay tuned, freinds, for this is only scratching the surface. My three-part research project on the true Masonic roots of the United States and its constitution is coming close to being finished. What you have just read has everything to do with that history, with the foundations of Freemasonry, with the establishment and support of Zionism and Israel (Kingdom of Jerusalem), and the fruition of the planned World War III as penned by the Masons themselves at the rebuilding of the sacred Temple of Solomon upon and over the holy Muslim site on the Mount to incite war.

I will post the link to that project here when completed, entitled Cracking The Cult Of The Constitution

.

–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com
–Thursday, June 20th, 2013

CAFR Confession


A friend and listener to our local AM station took our interview with the mayor of Salt Lake County, where he admits to the county CAFR and over $650 million in extra fund balances. He also included the CAFR pages I read from as reference.

Though I already posted the interview (audio only), I feel like this is the most important public official confession as to the wealth of the government as shown in government’s financial statements.

Please pass this on…

Also, learn more about government Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports (CAFR’s) with CAFR School, here:

Part 1: The State of Wisconsin CAFR –

https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2011/03/01/wisconsins-real-financial-situation-explained/

Part 2: Introduction to CAFR – City of Aurora, Co –

https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2011/03/03/cafr-school-a-lesson-in-financial-accounting/

Part 3: Advanced study – State of Minnesota CAFR –

https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2011/03/09/cafr-school-part-2-minnesotas-state-cafrs-explained/

Now compare these to your own local, county state, and school district CAFR’s.

.

–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Tuesday, July 12, 2011

 

 

 

 

Zionism 101: The Zionist Israeli Government Of The United States Of Amerika


Zionism 101: Part Two – See original in depth Zionism 101 here: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2010/06/11/zionism-101-the-complete-story/ (Recommended after this post)

“The Jewish people as a whole will become its own Messiah. It will attain world dominion by the dissolution of other races, by the abolition of frontiers, the annihilation of monarchy and by the establishment of a world republic in which the Jews will everywhere exercise the privilege of citizenship.

In this New World Order the children of Israel will furnish all the leaders without encountering opposition. The Governments of the different peoples forming the world republic will fall without difficulty into the hands of the Jews. It will then be possible for the Jewish rulers to abolish private property and everywhere to make use of the resources of the state. Thus will the promise of the Talmud be fulfilled, in which is said that when the Messianic time is come, the Jews will have all the property of the whole world in their hands.”

— Baruch Levy. Article: Letter to Karl Marx, in magazine ‘La Revue de Paris’, p.574, June 1, 1928

Our government is now completely in Zionist control. And the above quoted timeline is happening as we speak, just as was written so long ago. And obviously so, as the 10 planks of the Communist Manifesto are now law in the United States. (See them here: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2010/04/25/the-united-states-communist-manifesto/).

So, who is Zionist in the American government?

The following is a list of the power structure of the United States government, listed by seat of succession to the presidency of the United States. Remembering that all but one of these officers were not elected but appointed, that being the president who did the appointing, it is no wonder that every single one of them are admittedly Zionist, extremely pro-Israel, that many are of Jewish Israeli descent, and that some even have duel Israeli/American citizenship.

The following videos are out of their mouths, admissions and affirmations of their support for Zionism and for Israel. There is no other country in the world for which the United States or its “politicians” gives such fervent support. We are not “friends” of any other nation. And we are not “allies” with any Arab country… Of course, with a completely Jewish and Zionist cabal in complete and total power of the United States government, why would the Arab Middle-East be an ally or a friend to the United States – except through fear, dependence and coercion – nor a completely Israeli Zionist American government to its sworn enemy of the Arab nations?

Let’s have a look at the royal family of Obama’s APPOINTED cabinet:

#1 Barack Obama – It’s much easier to prove our presidents’ Zionist loyalty is not to America when a group called “Jewish Americans for Obama” comes right out and says it. Barack Obama might as well be Jewish. A true Muslim he most obviously is not… for if he were, his whole appointed staff would not be Jewish, duel-Israeli citizens, and/or Zionist! He wouldn’t be caught dead wearing a little Jewish Yamaka while visiting the Wailing Wall, and he most certainly would not support Israel and Zionism; the sworn enemy of all Arabs/Muslims!

“Those who threaten Israel, threaten us!” -Barack Obama

“Jerusalem will remain the capital of Israel, and it must remain undivided…” -Barack Obama

Imagine, a Muslim saying such things?

“There is a special connection between America and Israel. One that, when I traveled to Israel, was evident. Not only do we share so much in terms of common culture (usury, indecency, xenophobia, cruelty, immorality, etc…?) not only is it the sight of so much of our– of my religious faith, and the sight of so much of our understanding of the world around us… it is critical that we send a message around the world, we will stand with Israel. We want them around, not just for 60 years but for 600 years. And when I’m president of the United States they will have an unwavering ally in me.” -Barack Obama-

More of the same:

#1.5 Rahm Emmanuel (Chief of Staff) – Let’s face it, the chief of staff is the boss! The late Sherman Skolnick of Chicago called Rahm Emanuel the “Acting Deputy Chief for North America of the Mossad – Israeli Intelligence (http://www.cloakanddagger.de/media/S_284_S/Overthrow%20series/Rahm%20Emanuel.htm).” Skolnick went on to say that Emanuel’s father Benjamin had been “part of the Israeli assassin team that murdered Sweden’s Count [Folke] Bernadotte” in 1948. Bernadotte was the envoy of the United Nations in Palestine who sought to find a solution to the UN Partition Plan that gave Palestinian land to Jews from “beyond the pale.”

The Emanuel family name was Auerbach until 1936, although they are not related to the famous rabbinical family of Germany and Krakow named Auerbach. His father Ezekiel supposedly changed the family name to Emanuel when his son with that name died fighting Palestinians in 1936. Many Jewish families in Palestine changed their names to make themselves sound like they actually came from Palestine. And you wondered where all those Jews disappeared during World War II? Sheinerman became Sharon, Yezernitzky became Shamir, and Auerbach became Emanuel, and so on. And then multiply by a few hundred thousand. Voila! Millions of European Jews vanish from the face of the Earth – and build new lives in Palestine. -Christopher Bolyn-

Here is a news interview in which his military service in the Israeli army is admitted, and Emanuel quotes: “The best thing that can happen to Israel, is a strong America… because when America is strong, Israel is also strong.” And remember, Israel has over 200 nuclear weapons…

And why again would a Muslem (Obama) be a friend of Israel?

A completely Zionist, Israeli friendly appointed cabinet… this is why we will never have peace with the Middle East:

#2 Joe Biden – Biden was the first U.S. official to give Israel’s bloody assault (on an aid flotilla) a thumbs up. The former Delaware senator has been a key part of Israel’s Hasbara branch, American section, since entering the Senate in 1973 and on Wednesday, June 1st following the Israeli attack, he appeared on the Charlie Rose Show where he showed no hesitation in defending Israel’s handling of the raid (9 dead), something that President Obama had been reluctant to do.

Obama picked Biden “…who is about as close to the pro-Israel community as any member of either house…” observed MJ Rosenberg, a former AIPAC staffer, on TPM Café, just after Biden’s selection. “Biden is rated 100 per cent by AIPAC. When he goes to the synagogues in Florida, he goes not as a visitor but as ‘mishpocha’ [family]. The Jews simply love the guy… Bottom line, the Biden choice pretty much eliminated Obama’s ‘Jewish problem.” That was then and now it doesn’t seem to matter what position Obama takes, Biden seems to answer to his real boss. And it ain’t Barack. -CounterPunch (http://www.counterpunch.org/blankfort06112010.html)-

“I am a Zionist. You don’t have to be a Jew to be a Zionist.” -Joe Biden-

“Pollard should be given leniency.” -Joe Biden-

Pollard was the Israeli spy who caused the death of many U.S. spies in Russia, by revealing their identities. This is the very definition of treason. Israel is not our friend. Israel is the only country who continuously commits terrorist acts against the United States.

Enough said there Joe…

Here’s the self-proclaimed Zionist Joe Biden on the Charlie Rose show talking about the recent flotilla killings by Israeli soldiers of Turkish peace activists, calling for Israel to investigate itself on the murders in international waters:

#3 Nancy Pelosi – Pelosi reaffirms that “America and Israel share an unbreakable bond: in peace and war; and in prosperity and in hardship.” [Pelosi Press Release: http://web.archive.org/web/20060202151116/democraticleader.house.gov/press/releases.cfm?pressReleaseID=999] Pelosi emphasized that “a strong relationship between the United States and Israel has long been supported by both Democrats and Republicans. America’s commitment to the safety and security of the State of Israel is unwavering… however, the war in Iraq has made both America and Israel less safe.” Pelosi’s voting record shows consistent support for Israel. Prior to 2006 elections in the Palestinian Authority, she voted for a Congressional initiative disapproving of participation in the elections by Hamas and other organizations defined as terrorist by the legislation. She agrees with the current U.S. stance in support of land-for-peace. She has applauded Israeli “hopeful signs” of offering land, while criticizing Palestinian “threats” of not demonstrating peace in turn. She states, “If the Palestinians agree to coordinate with Israel on the evacuation, establish the rule of law, and demonstrate a capacity to govern, the world may be convinced that finally there is a real partner for peace”.

During the 2006 Lebanon War, Pelosi voted in favor of Resolution 921 on the count that “the seizure of Israeli soldiers by Hezbollah terrorists was an unprovoked attack and Israel has the right, and indeed the obligation, to respond”. She argues that organizations and political bodies in the Mideast like Hamas and Hezbollah “have a greater interest in maintaining a state of hostility with Israel than in improving the lives of the people they claim to represent”. Pelosi asserts that civilians on both sides of the border “have been put at risk by the aggression of Hamas and Hezbollah” in part for their use of “civilians as shields by concealing weapons in civilian areas”.

In September 2008, Pelosi hosted a reception in Washington with Israeli Knesset speaker Dalia Itzik, along with 20 members of Congress where they toasted the “strong friendship” between Israel and the United States. During the ceremony, Pelosi held up the replica dog tags of the three Israeli soldiers captured by Hezbollah and Hamas in 2006 and stated that she keeps them as a “symbol of the sacrifices made, sacrifices far too great by the people of the state of Israel”. Why should a representative of a state of our union be interested in the “state” of Israel? That’s how powerful the Israeli lobby is, and how infiltrated the United States government is. Here is Pelosi speaking at a Celebration of Israel’s 61st Independence Day, Washington, DC, 04/29/2009:

Once again, “You don’t have to be Jewish to be a Zionist.” -Joe Biden-

Ron Paul exposing Pelosi’s treasonous loyalty to Israel:

#4 Daniel Inouye (Japanese American) – Senator Daniel Inouye (D-HI) (eldest and by senatorial custom voted for in line of succession) as Chairman of the US Subcommittee on Defense, for his part, reaffirmed America’s commitment to the Zionist regime in a meeting with Ashkenazi and described Tehran’s uranium enrichment and long-range missile technologies as the ‘principal and most potent threat’ to Israel and the Middle East…

“I think that when the US helps Israel it actually helps itself,” he said.

#5 Hillary Rodham Clinton (Secretary of State) – Mrs. Clinton is of course a staunch supporter of Israel, standing firm with her husband. One generally stands beside the most powerful lobby in the world, even if it’s for another country. To go against AIPAC is brave, but political scuicide.

Here she is speaking at AIPAC about Iran and America’s commitment to Israel, even while speaking about Israel’s war crimes and illegal settlements into Palestinian land – having the gall to refer to the Palestinians as neighbors of Israel, which was all Palestinian land before the brutal and violent Zionist takeover of this land.

“We are determined to keep moving forward along a path that ensures Israel’s future as a secure and democratic Jewish state living in peace with its Palestinian and Arab neighbors.” -Hillary Clinton-

“…and in dealing with this (Iran) threat, as I have said for a very long time, no option can be taken off the table (refering of course to the nuclear option).” -Hillary Clinton-

*** Notice the disturbing mix of United States and Israeli flags around the AIPAC podium and Mrs. Clinton. I can’t find any other country in which this mixing of flags happens. Talk about unpatriotic!

#5 Timothy Geithner (Secretary of the Treasury) – A faithful member of the Council on Foreign Relations, The Bilderberg Group, The Center for Global Development (Board of Directors), The Economic Club of New York (trustee), The Bank for International Settlements – Committee On Payment and Settlement Systems (chairman)… as well as being the former President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, A former employee of Kissinger Associates, A former member of the Group Of Thirty (G30), former Director of the Policy Development and Review Department (2001–2003) at the International Monetary Fund, and many other Zionist controlled exploits. In March 2008, after his 2007 efforts to reduce the capital required to run a bank (reserve), he arranged the rescue and sale of Bear Stearns. In the same year, he played a supporting role to his predecessor Henry Paulson, former CEO of Zionist Goldman Sachs, in the decision to bail out AIG just two days after deciding not to rescue (not Zionist enough) Lehman Brothers from bankruptcy.

His father, Peter F. Geithner, was the director of the Asia program at the Ford Foundation in New York in the 1990s. During the early 1980s, Peter Geithner oversaw the Ford Foundation’s micro-finance programs in Indonesia being developed by Ann Dunham Soetoro, President Barack Obama’s mother.

So what are his loyalties to Israel and Zionism?

Considering the above ties, and his employment under staunch Zionists Robert Rubin, Larry Summers, Henry Kissinger, and his assignment as president of the most powerful of non-governmental foreign banks called the New York Federal Reserve bank, and considering that Zionists do not generally hire from outside of “the club”, I’d say his resume defines his loyalties quite well.

Disappointingly, I couldn’t find any videos of Mr. Geithner expressing his particular brand of unwavering love for Israel, but I’m sure they are out there…

#6 Robert Gates (Secretary of Defense) – So much for the “change” part of Obama’s Hope and Change campaign… Gates was made 15th Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (a private non-governmental organization) by George Bush Sr. and was heavily involved in the Iran-Contra Affair (a CIA, and not a U.S. government event – Oliver North was working for the CIA in his part as well). Gates was then made Secretary of Defense by the good son: George Bush Jr. in 2006.

And then Obama was apparently told to keep him on as the number 6 man in line for the presidency.

I suppose stranger things have happened…

Of Mr. Gates many corporate ventures, one that should raise eyebrows is his work with VoteHere, “a technology company which sought to provide cryptography and computer software security for the electronic election industry. Following his nomination, a White House spokeswoman said that Gates planned to sell all the stock he owns in individual companies and sever all ties with them if confirmed by the Senate.” This is what one might refer to as an unpresidented conflict of interest, as are all corporate ties which are directly effected by political power, but especially ones related to the voting in of so-called “elected officials”.

And we mustn’t forget his service on the Council On Foreign Relations (CFR) regarding Iran and the “Iraq Study group”…

But he seems so… American! Could Robert Gates really be a Zionist? A supporter of Israel?

“As President Obama has affirmed, the United States’ commitment to Israels’ security is unshakable and our defense relationship is stronger than ever, to the mutual benefit of both nations… Our work together on missile defense technology is ongoing, and the United States will continue to ensure that Israel maintains its qualitative military edge.-Robert Gates, April 27, 2010, C-SPAN.

Can someone explain to me why the United States is “sharing” our secretive missile defenses with Israel. Do we share it with anyone else with such fervor and public ceremony?

And how about the 200 nuclear warheads that Israel holds? Wonder where those came from…?

#7 Eric Holder (Attorney General) – Where to begin with this guy…

(Note: The Israeli/Jewish/Zionist ADL is the most powerful lobby in the world.)

According to the European Union Times: “Eric Holder was the featured speaker at the Anti-Defamation League’s American Heritage Dinner on October 17, 2009, and praised ADL for its historic role in fighting all forms of intolerance and helping make the federal hate crimes law a reality. He called passage of ADL’s hate bill a “marvelous step of progress” and gratefully looks forward to close and continued cooperation with ADL in hate law implementation. ADL recently announced that, having spearheaded passage of The Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Hate Crimes Prevention Act, it will now lead stage two, a massive national campaign to train lawyers to become hate crimes prosecutors. (Note: unconstitutional, and blatant encroachment on states rights).

Holder says that, having been personally frustrated over the past 11 years in his efforts to help pass the hate bill, as Attorney General he is determined to begin immediate enforcement. “. . .the new hate crimes legislation will arrive not a moment too soon. And on the day that it becomes law, we will hasten to begin using it.” (Note: To put people like me in jail for reporting the truth, as stated by Zionists themselves?)

Here are highlights of Holder’s speech – full of praise for ADL – and misrepresentations concerning the new hate law and the alleged “epidemic of hate” it claims to address.

“You – the members of the Anti-Defamation League – and I go way back. I first began convening meetings with members of the ADL in the early 90′s when I served as the United States Attorney in Washington, D.C. . . At that time I expressed my deep appreciation for the fact that you always have served as indispensable allies in some of the most important work our government does. And now, tonight, I once more have the opportunity to stand in solidarity with you, and to thank you for your constant, steadfast work to create a better country. A country free of discrimination; a country free of violence; a country free of hate. The Obama Administration could ask no better partner than the Anti-Defamation League as we jointly strive to attain the ideals of equal opportunity, equal rights, and equal justice for all. Members of the ADL – I salute you.”

Equal rights for all? That’s not what Holder said in testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee this spring. He asserted that the hate bill does not protect Christian ministers, whites, heterosexuals, policemen and members of U.S. military. Only favored groups, he said, such as homosexuals, blacks, Latinos, Jews, Muslims, and women will benefit under this new law:

In Holder’s speech to the ADL he continues this charade, asserting that under America’s new hate law “we will also continue to defend vigilantly the civil rights of all people in this country and prosecute criminal acts discrimination wherever we find them.” “The new law expands the list of protected categories beyond race, color, religion or national origin, and for the first time, allows the federal government to prosecute violence undertaken because of the actual or perceived gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, or disability of any person.”

Holder gives every impression, as ADL did through 19 years of hyping their hate bills to state and federal legislators, that all Americans are protected under hate laws according to “race, color, religion, or national origin.” In reality, ADL never intended any of its hate laws in America – or throughout the world – to protect anyone except those groups ADL considers victims of white, Christian, male, heterosexual civilization.

Holder goes on to note that “the desperate need for a strengthened federal law enforcement capability against hate crimes has been perfectly clear.” Perfectly clear? …What is perfectly clear is that there exists no “desperate need” for federal takeover of local law enforcement.

Further, Holder said that about 7,500 hate crimes a year since 1990, averaging one every hour of the day, “is a staggering figure. . .completely unacceptable.” Actually, out of an average of 11 million crimes annually reported by police to the FBI, alleged hate crimes average only 1/10 of one percent – hardly a level of criminal activity of the epidemic proportion portrayed by Holder and ADL. Less than five percent of these reported hate crimes have ever been established as fact by courts of law, yet Holder says the level of unreported level of hate crimes in America is probably “in the tens of thousands. This fact is enough to make one’s blood run cold.” Fact? How credible is an Attorney General who regards such undocumented speculation as “fact?”

Holder says, “The stubborn persistence of anti-Semitism saddens me” What is anti-Semitism? ADL’s Office of Global Anti-Semitism in the U.S. State Department says “anti-Semitism” means any “strong criticism” of Israel or its leaders, or claims that the Jews had Christ killed. Holder says any such anti-Semitic “hate speech” even as “a casual joke made in private when the speaker thinks no Jewish person is listening,” is very, very bad. It “should scald the conscience of every American.” He also promises that Muslims will be vigorously protected under America’s new hate law, just as they are in Canada, Britain, France and Australia.

Holder concludes with more flattery of ADL: “This organization has a great tradition of refusing to stand by when others are suffering. You are guided by your tenets (racism), your precepts (superiority), and your values (usury) to come to the aid of others who need help. And so, this evening, I humbly call upon you to join me and this new administration in reaching out to all our American neighbors.” (mine)

Note: The ADL and all lobbies are influential, to say the least. But in reality, these lobbies (especially the ADL) are actually writing the bills that are being passed in congress, by the senate, and by the President. This can no longer be called a lobby. It is more like a legislative branch of the government by proxy – unelected, unappointed, and unwanted!

Well… that should be enough for now, I suppose. I doubt the presidency would go to Janet Nepalitano at #18 in line of succession. Though the thought is frightening!

Let’s have a look at a few more Zionist’s though before we go back to pretending it all ain’t so…

The Republican Bush Cabinet – So that you don’t confuse the paradigm of left and right with regards to the power structure of government and the appointed officials under the last republican president, here is a video (you should watch the whole movie) which tells about the at least 32 duel-Israeli citizens appointed by George Bush to his cabinet:

Part 7:

Part 8:

AIPAC – A good documentary program (subtitles) about the most powerful lobby in the United States (which is for a foreign country), the American Israeli Public Affairs Committee. “AIPAC” is the symbol for which Obama makes a large portion of his speeches, as the Israeli flag hangs in the oval office across from the Stars and Stripes.

Part 1:

Part 2:

Part 3:

Part 4:

Part 5:

Part 6: “…because Israel has no other friends in the world.”

On June 5, 2002, at the American Jewish Congress in Philadelphia, Executive Director of its Philadelphia region Joseph Puder stated that, “We are watching the high noon of American Jewish power in the United States, and it’s moving downward. … At the same time we have the influx of a large Muslim community … not like any other community. Every single one of their national organizations with the exception of the Islamic Supreme Council of North America is an Islamist organization.” He concludes, “In the next ten years when the final settlement over the Middle East crisis is going to take place, when the deal is going to be cut about Israel, it’s going to occur at the time of the maximum Muslim immigration, maximum insertion of Muslim political power, and that’s something we’ve got to watch out for.”

Media in Israel – It is striking how similar the invasive, destructive, and disrespectful procedures of the Israeli military are compared to American forces in Iraq and Afghanistan. This is not coincidence, as it is Israel who runs our government and by default, our military. We are Zionist Israels army, the new Red Army.

The agreement between Zionist owned media outlets in America and Israel very seldom let the real plight of the Palestinians at the hands of Israeli soldiers on their news.

And when anything against the status que happens in America, the Zionist owned and controled media in America is there to cover it with completely pro-Zionist, pro-Israel slant.

Here’s a bunch of Jewish Rabbis condemning Israel as an illegitimate state, and condemning Zionism as an Enemy of Jews. Instead of reporting an unbiased and newsworthy story, the media makes these brave men look like crazy outcasts, giving no airtime to explain why they are there:

And hey, here’s one that after reading all this should make you laugh as you cry!

And so I ask you one more time, oh faithful reader and free-thinker… Why does the United States government support Israel so passionately?

Answer: Zionism has complete and total stranglehold on all aspects of government, entertainment, media, banking, inteligence, and corporate structure.

Short Answer: America is Zionist Israel’s bitch!!!

.

–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)

Sunday, August 29, 2010