Confessions Of A Former Truther


.

In Defense Of The Stupid: Perspectives By A Reformed Truther

To varying degrees, those who imagine that they have taken part in the popular alternative media notion that they have “woken up” begin to reference the majority of the remaining population as stupid. Zombies. Sheep. I suppose this is simply a sophomoric way of distinguishing one’s self from those who have not learned what the individual or group has learned – a surreal sense of self-entitled elitism for the collective minority stake of disenfranchised denizens. And yet these supposedly now “elite” members of the woken up club will be the first to retain an attorney when their still enslaved legal persona is in legal harm’s way.

When politically things don’t go the way the woken up wish that they would in their outreach and activism, these “truthers” inevitably blame the un-indoctrinated mass of stupid people, which always seems to represent the faceless majority of the population out there that isn’t part of the truther network. If only the woken up were running things, everything would be peachy keen…

In all cases the problems of the world seem to stem from the collective stupidity of the rest of the race of man, of which the woken up seem to believe they are somehow no longer a part of in classic class-oriented stylings. Thus far, I have not been privy to any written test or other indicator of just who is awake and who is stupid and not awake. But it seems to be that the stupid people are the ones whom either disagree with or just wont listen to the awakened and their insistent truth.

The woken up carry an invisible torch that represents their perceived awareness for which they call ultimately “the truth”. They are indeed the self-labeled “truthers,” as if all else in stupid-land is not truth. In fact, about a single subject like 9-11-2001, these woken up truthers can have among them literally dozens of different and disagreeable “truths” for which they spew as somehow the one and only truth. There were planes on that day and there were also no planes. There were holograms and there were missiles. It was bombs and it was energy weapons. It was Israeli Mossad and it was the CIA. Bush was merely complicit and Bush pulled the trigger himself…

Anyone in stupid-ville presented with such vast varieties of the truth from such a woken up class of alternative misfits would certainly be more repulsed to the truth than accepting of it, which is exactly where I found myself as I listened to the rantings and ravings of my fellow truthers. Inevitably, when this public repulsion manifests in the form of them asking unanswerable questions or their denial of that presented truth by the apparently awakened people, the awakened get just as angry and fallacious in their response and repose as their apparently stupid counterparts in their own defensive dispositions. At this point the ad hominem attack creeps in from the unawares, and terms like sheeple, ignorant, and stupid are spewed in between truths.

No one would sanely argue over what is reality. But truth has many different flavors, being merely the perception of reality based on the learned knowledge of the subject of a particular thing in reality. Truth changes with different opinions. Reality exists despite any opinion.

Interestingly, woken up individuals must first and foremost admit that in order to become one of the awakened, one must first have been one of the apparently stupid. Though there is no merit badge, this turning point in the personal comprehension of one’s disposition and transformation from one of the stupid to one of the awake never seems to have an inception point. It is more so a leap of faith than an initiation into the truther club; an incremental change of paradigm and self-aggrandizement. It requires nothing really but a change of attitude; or more to the point, a change of perspective. But most important are the words and terms of art that come with that transference, for the elite always have their own artifice. Stupid is one of those terms. For suddenly the notion of independence from the stupid masses becomes a pertinent requirement of the awakening process. And slowly everything becomes murkily clear – all of the problems in the world seem to rest not on one’s self, but instead on the amorphous blob of stupid people out there.

This is apparently the 1st (and sadly often times the last) level of the awakening process.

And a truther one becomes…

It doesn’t matter that as a member of the awake club one has only actually physically met about 0.00000001% of the entire population of all of those people that are supposedly the stupid sheep out there. All that matters is that the awakened have come to a consensus that everyone else is stupid but us, no matter how irrational that notion actually is, and that this is the central division point in society between them, us, and they. This generality does not consider the notion that many of those stupid people have never heard the religion of truth from the awakened through digital and printed media. Thus, many are stupid sheerly because of the non-availability of information called “truth”. But we find that this is no excuse, for just like fundamentalist Christian folk the awake believe that everyone must have access to the truth – that the truth is universal – and so all of stupidity as a culture must therefore be simply in denial of the truth.

If I’m not mistaken, I think the same thing happened when the Christian settlers came to America and discovered not the just the land, but that the true native inhabitants of that land had never heard of Christ; and suddenly the universal truth of the church was not so universal after all. And so how does history go…? Better to kill these stupid natives than to admit that a different truth may indeed exist than the truth of the corporate church and its professors (truthers)… Or perhaps it was that the settlers didn’t actually have the whole truth, which would mean integration of cultural ideals that might defeat the percieved truth of the church! After all, it’s not like anybody on this secular Earth ever has all truth…

Ultimately, the life of a truther becomes more and more secluded, introverted, and lonely. After living in Manhattan for several years, I can certainly attest that one can be extremely lonely in a city of millions upon millions of lost souls; even when they are stacked up on top of each other like oily sardines. When one of the awakened finds that most people look at him as if he is speaking a foreign language as he tries to force his own brand of truth down the stupid people’s throats, a unique anxiety begins to develop that steers the truther into an even more “outside-the-box” feeling, while ultimately still being just as stuck within the box as the rest of us. After a while, the awakened realize that each of their fellow awakened elites seem to have different opinions about what the truth actually is, often in contradiction to each other. They begin to argue with one another instead of with the stupid people as they sit in meeting circles within public library rooms and relish a dream of change that they cannot ever seem to evoke.

Truth will create the change, if we could just agree on what the truth is and then not piss people off by forcibly “sharing” it with them while they are trying to enjoy what little joy life has to offer in some public park or boardwalk. Surely the stupid people came out to hear truth from the truth brigade, not just to enjoy the ocean view or play with their own children in spiritual happiness. And so like illegals on the Las Vegas strip flashing nudie adverts and hustling ads for prostitution and tittie bars, the awakened flash their own propoganda while insulting those who don’t bite the lure.

Once in a while one of the awakened actually wakes up a bit more than they are supposed to when they realize that none in their group actually seems to comprehend the actual reality of things, and that for the most part they are all looking for the same answers to the same questions that you and the other stupid people are. And so what at first was an appealing inclusion and membership into what appeared to be an awkward but special type of group status, turns out to be just an unorganized bunch of just-as-stupid people who just happened to stumble into the alternative realm and learn a few things others don’t know, and thus were re-enfranchised from stupidity into a group that believes they are different from the rest – and thus awake. Just like religion…

What does this really mean?

Ultimately, I figured out that the call-you-stupid thing is just an excuse. Not an excuse for everyone else, mind you, but an excuse for the name-caller himself – the awake one, that is. The true agitation among these truth groups is that they can never get anything done; that they cannot create the change they wish to be or see because they never do anything tangible in support of the change other than blaming others for the problems. And so the universal fallacy of an excuse must be that everyone else is stupid, asleep, and sheep because they do not conform to the cornucopia of multiple truths espoused by the awakened. And perhaps this consensus of fallacy is the reason these truth groups are so appealing in the first place. What a perfectly simple-minded concept, that everything is wrong because other people are responsible for the wrongness – but never myself. Never OUR-selves.

In retrospect, it was the perfect cop-out. For as long as other faceless people were responsible for all the world’s problems, it must certainly mean that I was not. I could hide away from my own lack of knowledge with like-minded individuals while, again being akin to Christianity as a sect, we all believed that we were special. We believed we could change the world by spreading our truth through obnoxiousness and guerrilla media. And with this simulated act of armchair confessionals, our souls were somehow being cleared in the real world without actually making any stand whatsoever against the evil for which we preach. There are no real efforts to change real things in real life. Spread the word of truth as if it is the word of God, and the brotherhood of truth will be saved and raptured from that hell we warned the unawake about.

Sounding more and more like religion, isn’t it?

Well, you know what? It worked. Truth groups stand as their own form of controlled opposition. We may have had some meger success at converting the stupid into the church of truth. But it only worked on those looking for a fallacious excuse to blame everyone else for the problems of the world while in actuality doing nothing about it, which is a fairly small community of stupids. It only worked on those who were tired of feeling alone in their contemplation of such a screwed up political system, and thus were already searching for like-minded people to blame for all the problems they couldn’t and honestly didn’t really want to fix. Complaining is sufficient and paramount to curing, apparently.

Unfortunately, the drop-out rate is also quite high in these truther groups because of this strange notion of truth being so multi-faceted as to include all different types of truths to explain just one truth. There seems to be more debate than consensus among truthers, and most members are followers instead of leaders that will accept unrealistic truths just to fit in.

Perhaps most disturbing are the shock-jocks like Alex Jones, whose mega-corporation infiltrates and promotes on-air these groups while selling their members his own version of the truth. Ultimately, the group settles by consensus on which activism materials, bumper stickers, DVD’s, and other purchasable items to use and hand out, many of them from Jones’s “Infowars” mega-franchise. It’s very similar to the cheap plastic gizmo scheme in China under the doctrine of planned obsolescence, where disposable products mean future repeat customers. His brilliant but ultimately evil marketing strategy is simply to copy and hand out his purchased materials, in hopes of bringing ever more worker bees into his profitable media hive of Infowars corporations. And it works. For most people prefer to purchase his products of re-presented “truth” than to take them for free. This type of psychological approach to sales is certainly not new. But perhaps in this movement it was perfected by Jones. Selling through fear and intimidation, the Infowars franchise has turned into a truth monster, offering everything the paranoid truther could possibly need while he or she waits for the economic apocalypse. For the truther often cocoons and transcends into the slightly evolved prepper – creating two customers in one by splitting the personality of each. And the alternative and mainstream commercial machine is now specifically catering to this multi-billion dollar industry to furnish those with the mindset of some pre-ordained truther knowledge of the apparent truth of a future, yet unpredictable financial collapse with the products and services they’ll need to survive like cockroaches in a holocaust.

But the notion of actually correcting or changing the system so that this collapse doesn’t actually happen seems to now be just a sweet memory of what activism was intended to promote – the change we wish to be and see. A simulacra of truth has blossomed, where the battle is against words and opinions instead of against the physicality and reality of what will cause the apocalypse.

For truth is merely simulated reality – the perception of what is without knowing what is…

–=–

“The simulacrum is never what hides the truth –
it is truth that hides that fact that there is none.
The simulacrum is true.” 

–Ecclesiastes

–=–

Sadly, this mentality of preparation has taken over the rationality of the awakened. It is as if instead of simply stepping out of the way of an oncoming bus or somehow making it stop before it hits us, we are sold on the idea that it is better to prepare for the symptoms of the bus hitting us at full speed without even attempting to get out of the way or prevent it. After all, the system is collapsing not because of us, but because of the stupid people. Like corporate Christians, we pretend to be prepared for the rapture while not trying to stop it from happening. The ultimate cop out!

Fixing the problems would be unprofitable for the likes of Jones and company. His sponsors would go broke, unable to sell their wares where no fear exists; the same profit model of any mainstream television or radio network. And now that I think about it, those truther groups are likely more successful at scaring people into fear-based purchases than they are at informing them of reality; which is great for the profit driven fear industry that the truth movement seems to have become just a marketing tool for.

Perhaps this explains why the mainstream media, especially Fox News and its so-called alternative “patriot” network, is following in the footsteps of the Infowar machine. As the likes of Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, and other talking heads with multi-million dollar contracts spew fear and violence as their top stories, I’ve noticed that their commercials are now strangely imitative of those on the alternative news fear porn networks. Ads for storable food, gold and silver, alternative healing and medicines, and other patriotic-sounding “alternative” products permeate the mainstream airwaves: an almost exact profit-based model taken over from the alternative radio syndicate. It’s nothing more than the master selling his servants their own imagination, in preparation not for what is, but for what could happen.

As a former member of these groups like We Are Change, I can only say this. Get over yourselves! I did. The pre-scripted game plan is not working, and seems to me in fact to be working to the advantage of your adversaries, including Infowars and the like. The war is not over information, for most of that is the truth of ill-informed informers. It is extraneous secular information that is preventing you from acting like men, believing in a legal law that supports tyranny and plunder instead of fighting it with the passion and blood of old. You protest government from a safe distance in free speech zones. You pretend to battle the courts by never entering into them. You speak about government where your voice is never heard by government. You speak truth but never act within it. You store food but never feed the hungry. You replenish your storage when after 5 years surprise!, nothing has changed. You hoard gold and silver in preparation of a dollar collapse while still valuing it in those same dollars. You demonize the Crown, the Fed, the Treasury, the banks, and the banker Rothschilds even as they set the artificial market price of gold each day in the City of London – the same gold that you hoard. You go through the motions of preparation for the un-preparable. You stockpile guns and ammo with no intention to use them to solve these problems (the original intent), only to protect your just-in-case stash for when the problems perpetuate. You hope or pray instead of taking action. You use truth as an insult to those who don’t see it. You expose without consequence and enlighten without cause or action. You are victims of your own paradigm… bound in chains and controlled by the very information you pretend will set others free.

None of this is rational behavior.

I should know, I was one of you…

There is no such thing as being awake when you are living in and as this legal fiction, where truth is always a lie.

If you’ve gotten this far (without being irrationally insulted), you might find this helpful:

Link–> https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2014/01/22/its-time-to-join-the-reality-movement/

Link–> https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2013/02/26/social-media-the-simulation-of-action/

.

–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Wednesday, November 26th, 2014

A Pictorial History Of The World’s Governments


Due to the overwhelming popularity of A Pictorial History Of The United States Government (LINK) I thought it prudent to present a pictorial and historical escapade into the infection of the rest of the world by this tiny but powerful bloodline minority. For until we can see, all of our cultures and heritages shall continue to be perverted and uniformly eroded as planned and foretold for centuries.

Please note that this more advanced essay is an integral part to the comprehension of my upcoming multi-part series on the founding of the United States and its Constitution – the Masonic origins of America – and why the fervent desire to build and support Israel (Zionsim) at all costs is so prevalent in our collective set of world leaders. Today’s presentation includes photos, quotes, and my own commentary to help put the puzzle pieces of the past together in their proper historical perspective so as to understand the collective disposition of the unorganized masses of people of the world under this unified international foe.

In the end, after weeks of careful assembly, you will certainly realize an undeniable and inconvenient truth about our world, who promotes war and pestilence for profit, and what controls most nations.

This time from A to Z: 100 pictures are indeed worth 10,000 words…

–=–

File:WJC meeting with Argentine President Cristina Kirchner.jpg
Argentina – World Jewish Congress leaders meet with Argentine
President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner in Buenos Aires, June 2008


Australia – Prime Minister Julia Gillard


President Heydar Alyev


Belgium – Prime Minister Yves Leterme
receives a compass called the ‘Navigator of Jerusalem’,
from European Jewish Congress President Moshe Kantor

File:Interreligious-Meeting - Mustafa Ceric - Herman Van-Rompuy-Marc-Schneier - Abdujalil Sajid - Brussels 2010.jpg
– Bosnia –
First Gathering of European Muslim and Jewish leaders in Brussels, December 2010 –
Grand Mufti Mustafa Ceric – European Council President Herman Van-Rompuy –
Rabbi Marc-Schneier – Imam Dr. Abdujalil Sajid


Brazil – President Lula (Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva)


Brazil – President Lula (Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva)
at the “holocaust” centre Yad Vashem, Israel


Brazil – (above) President Lula with Chabad members
(below) blowing the Ram’s Horn

https://i2.wp.com/w3.chabad.org/media/images/483/Xlgv4834050.jpg
Brazil –  first female president Dilma Rousseff, before the election


Canada – Prime Minister Stephen Harper


Canada – Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird, at Kfar Chabad


Canada – Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird

Photo: Thank you to everyone who came out tonight to the Jewish Heritage Month reception at Queen's Park!
Canada – MPP Mike Colle hosting Jewish Heritage Month at Queen’s Park –
OJA (Ontario Jewish Archives) of UJA- (United Jewish Appeal)


MPP Monte Kwinter, MPP Peter Shurman, MPP Mike Colle,
Councillor James Pasternak – at Lipa Green Centre for UJA


Councillor James Pasternak, Associate Director, Ontario Government Relations
At the Lipa Green Centre – The Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs (CIJA)

Infection on all levels…


Regional Councillor Rosati, Councillor Sheffman, Mayor Maurizio Bevilacqua,
Councillor DeFrancesca and Regional Councillor Michael DiBiase
Ontario Jewish Heritage Month — at Lipa Green Centre.


United Jewish Appeal campaign booklet, 1947,
For: “restoration of Palestine” and “resettlement in Canada”

https://i2.wp.com/www.loc.gov/exhibits/haventohome/images/hh0165s.jpg
United Jewish Appeal
Propaganda for support of refugee Jews in Europe and Palestine

Photo: Happy Victoria Day! We hope you are enjoying the long weekend. Although the OJA does not have any photographs of Queen Victoria, we have the next best thing: a photo of her great great granddaughter Queen Elizabeth II. Queen Elizabeth was in town for the dedication of the Mount Sinai Hospital in 1973.</p> <p>Monty Simmonds, Q.C., with Her Majesty the Queen Elizabeth II, Prince Philip and Bert Gerstein on the dedication of Mount Sinai Hospital, 600 University Ave., Toronto, 1973, OJA, photo #3675.
Queen Elizabeth II, Prince Philip, Monty Simmonds, Q.C, and Bert Gerstein
dedication of Mount Sinai Hospital, 600 University Ave., Toronto, Canada, 1973
–Ontario Jewish Archives (OJA), photo #3675.


Montreal, Canada – Mayor Michael Applebaum

“I am going to put my energies into my defense and into my family,”
Applebaum, who insists he is innocent, said.
“This is why I am resigning as mayor of Montreal –
it is the responsible thing to do,” he stressed.

Applebaum’s platform as Mayor was a promise to
“clean up Montreal’s culture of corruption”.

Not so ironically, this Jewish politician was recently charged with corruption in office!

–=–


Costa Rica – President Oscar Arias in Israel


Denmark – former Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen
(here as Secretary General of NATO)
with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu

–=–
The Crown Temple
And The United Kingdom Of Jerusalem
–=–

http://www.jpost.com/HttpHandlers/ShowImage.ashx?ID=10089
Great Britain – Queen Elizabeth

https://i2.wp.com/w3.chabad.org/media/images/354/NcRD3541928.jpg
Great Britain – Queen Elizabeth
This was the one person she knew not to shake hands with


Great Britain – Queen Elizabeth

Britain's Ambassador to Israel Matthew Gould and President Shimon Peres toast Queen Elizabeth II at an event marking her Diamond Jubilee (photo credit: Roni Schutzer/Flash90)
Britain’s Ambassador to Israel Matthew Gould with President Shimon Peres
toasting Queen Elizabeth II on her Diamond Jubilee…

“(the) president is one of few people who can match the monarch in uniting people”

–=–

Video: Queen Elizabeth II knights Israel President Shimon Peres

–=–

http://i1.wp.com/www.loonwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/prince_charles_yarmulke.jpg?resize=183%2C250
Prince Charles of Wales, regent to the British crown


Prince Charles of Wales


Winston Churchill with Bernard Baruch, the leader of Israel, in 1961.
–Library of Congress


“The late Prime Minister’s bronze image now looks out from the
Montefiore Gardens over the Tower of David to Jerusalem’s Old City,
which he first visited in 1921 with Lawrence of Arabia.”

Nir Barkat, Mayor of Jerusalem claimed the Second World War leader
as a champion for Jerusalem and Israel at the ceremony,
which was attended by Randolph Churchill, the prime minister’s
great grandson, and British Ambassador Mathew Gould.”

–=–

“During times like these, when the free world is faced with the threat of a nuclear
Iran and global terrorism, it is important to preserve Churchill’s legacy, having
led the world to victory against the Nazi tyrant, in Jerusalem,
the city of peace of freedom…”

–Isaac Herzog, a Labor MK who led the statue’s installation to Israel Hayom.

(Never mind that Israel is one of only three nuclear armed nations that
refused to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, for which Iran did sign)

–=–


Great Britain (U.K.) Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher
“The first British PM to visit Israel while in office”
In Israel with Golda Meir during her visit to Israel in 1976


Margaret Thatcher with Israel President Shimon Peres


Margaret Thatcher and Israeli President Yitzhak Shamir


With Israeli Minister of Industry and Trade Ariel Sharon in Jerusalem, May 1986


With Netanyahu


Thatcher with Menachem Begen

–=–
Death Of The Iron Lady
–=–

Excerpt from Israel’s Technion website (http://pard.technion.ac.il/technion-honors-baroness-margaret-thatcher/):

It is with sadness that the Technion – Israel Institute of Technology heard of the passing away of Britain’s former Prime Minister Baroness Margaret Thatcher. Thatcher was a keen friend and supporter of the Technion and had a sharp insight into the importance of the institute for the region and the world.

On Nov. 2nd 1989, Prime Minister Thatcher received an Honorary Doctorate from Technion President Dr Max Reis “in recognition of her life-long involvement in and passion for science and technology; her exceptional statesmanship in British and world affairs; and in gratitude for her friendship to the State of Israel.” The ceremony took place in Whitehall.

The proceeds of the function made possible the Margaret Thatcher Centre for Computational Chemistry

Below is the acceptance speech of Baroness Thatcher.

Sir Evelyn, Mr. Galil, [Immanuel Jakobovits] Chief Rabbi, your excellency, my lords, ladies and gentlemen.

Thank you for the very great honour you do me, — first by making me an honorary doctor of technical sciences of the Technion university and, — second, by naming the centre for computational chemistry at the university after me…

https://i0.wp.com/pard.technion.ac.il/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/thatcherwear.jpg

De Beers is the Jewish Zionist  Rothschild funded mining empire of Cecil Rhodes.

–=–

“Common sense tells us that the only way to increase the value
of diamonds is to make them scarce, that is to reduce production.”

—Cecil Rhodes, founder of De Beers Mining, who received funding
and for which De Beers is now owned by the founding Zionist ROTHSCHILD FAMILY.

“Our only risk is the sudden discovery of new mines, which
human nature will work recklessly to the detriment of us all.”

—Cecil Rhodes, founder of De Beers Mining

Surprise! Diamonds are all but worthless! The goy can be made to covet any rock or mineral by the manipulative international Jew. They control the markets, production, and pricing of shiny rocks. False scarcity has made gold king, silver queen, and turned the people into greedy debt slaves who have traded their freedom and physical wealth for fiat paper – all to buy jewelry!

–=–


If it were a snake it would have bit you…
For Americans, every dollar we spend not only supports Israel
but also has an embossed Star of David stamped on every note!


The Orion-tation Of Money

The EURion (Orion) Constellation is on most world currencies as a
“security feature”. It is in the shape of a “Z”.


“EURion Constelation” symbols are a counterfeiting measure where each zero
lines up by integer ratios between the squared distances of nearby circles,
shaped as the Orion constellation. This pattern is detected by image-processing software,
which causes the program to refuse to print the document. The Great pyramids
aligned to this Orion-tation (SE) and is very important in masonic custom.

This Orion security feature is now as international as the Zionist influence
that created it, with the all major central banks of the world utilizing it as a
digital watermark on their currencies. The International bankers are the
International bloodline – organized crime extraordinaire.

If currency represents sovereignty, then sovereignty no longer truly exists in this world.

–=–

Margaret Thatcher is also quoted from above as saying:

“Technion’s reputation extends far, far beyond the borders of Israel.
Technion’s work in every field – medicine, science, architecture –
is synonymous with the creation of the modern state of Israel.”

–=–

Upon the death of Margaret Thatcher, the Jewish Press in April 2013 revealed the true history of her treachery to her ridiculously loyal subjects:

“…it was Thatcher’s embrace of British Jews and insistent promotion of Jews in her Conservative Party that inspired an outpouring of tributes from Jewish and Israeli leaders following her death Monday at 87…

For the country’s Jews, however, her naming of several of their number to Cabinet positions and her determined pushback against anti-Jewish grumbling among the Conservative Party’s backbenchers made what once was unimaginable: the possibility of a Jewish prime minister.

Lady Thatcher was always extremely supportive and admiring of the ethos of the British Jewish community,” Vivian Wineman, the president of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, told JTA.

Wineman said the mutual admiration was rooted in personal history. In the 1930s, Thatcher’s family took in an Austrian Jewish refugee. In 1959, Thatcher was elected to Parliament representing Finchley, a north London constituency with a large Jewish population.

She counted a number of Jews among her closest advisers and confidants, and at one point nearly a quarter of her Cabinet were of Jewish origins,” Wineman said.

Moshe Maor, a Hebrew University political science professor whose expertise is Britain, said Thatcher admired the British Jewish community’s self-reliance, an ethos she embraced as she dedicated herself to weaning Britons off public assistance.

“Thatcher admired hard work, and the Jewish community was not dependent on the state,” Maor said. “It was structured in such a way that Jews help others in their community. That was the culture Thatcher tried to advance.”

It was one also embraced by Britain’s late chief rabbi, Immanuel Jakobovits, whom Thatcher elevated to the House of Lords. Frustrated by protests among Christian leaders of the rapid pace of her economic reforms, she increasingly turned for spiritual reinforcement to Jakobovits, who became widely known as “Thatcher’s rabbi.”

Thatcher’s rule coincided with social changes among the country’s 350,000 Jews. Once proudly working class, British Jews by the 1980s had become increasingly middle class, more likely to be self-employed and alarmed at the leftward lurch of the leadership in the Labor Party.

“She got on quite well with Jews,” Wineman said. “She said once that she thought she probably had more constituents in Tel Aviv than in Finchley.”

Thatcher never hesitated to advance the careers of talented young Jews in her party – among them Leon Brittan, a secretary of trade; Nigel Lawson, a chancellor of the exchequer; Edwina Currie, a health minister; Malcolm Rifkind, a secretary of state for Scotland; and Michael Howard, a secretary of employment.

Rifkind went on to become foreign minister. Howard became home secretary and then opposition leader, burying forever the notion that a British leader had to come from the country’s official faith, Anglicanism.

Thatcher’s embrace of the Jewish community did not make its romance with the Tories a permanent one. Tony Blair’s purges of the Labor left after his 1997 election helped draw back some Jewish voters. But Howard’s precedent helped set the stage for ascension of the current leader of the Labor Party, Ed Miliband, the son of Polish Jewish immigrants.

Thatcher also earned kudos for her robust foreign policy and maintaining strong ties with Israel at a time of tension between the Jewish state and other European nations. “She was truly a great leader, a woman of principle, of determination, of conviction, of strength; a woman of greatness,” Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a statement Monday. “She was a staunch friend of Israel and the Jewish people. She inspired a generation of political leaders.”

Source–> http://www.jewishpress.com/news/europe/thatcher-remembered-for-befriending-uk-jews-and-maintaining-strong-ties-with-israel/2013/04/10/

–=–
Establishing Socialism
Through Multiculturalism

–=–

This is the world-wide phenomenon of how, as the above article states, “the unimaginable” election of “Jews” to offices of high authority is now commonplace, especially in predominantly Christian and Muslim countries. Just as in Germany, the Jewish immigrants have taken hold of, culturally infiltrated and tainted, and financially advanced themselves on the backs of societies and majority races across the world. And this is how the governments of the world have been infected.

This article even rubs this corruption and subversion in the face of the British, referring to “anti-Jewish grumbling among the Conservative Party’s backbenchers in other words the actual majority race of British men for whom the international Jews have made insignificant in their own country; just as in the United States and around the nations of the world for all non-Jewish majority cultures and races (goy).

In short, the people no longer have representation…

And this is how “multiculturalism” is being used around the world as a tool for the cultural destruction of significance for all races who have inhabited those countries for 1,000’s of years. For the international Jew must break a nation of its cultural and racial identity before it can corrupt that culture with its own. And to do this, the international Jew must take over the governments of all cultures. This devious plan is implemented in many forms, from “civil rights” to “equal rights”, “naturalization” to “illegal immigration”; “equal opportunity” to the “right of return”, “affirmative action” to “hate crimes”, and in countless other cultural countermeasures that seem glorious and revolutionary.

But what is a revolution, really?

Revolution:

A: a sudden, radical, or complete change.

B: a fundamental change in political organization; especially:
the overthrow or renunciation of one government or ruler
and the substitution of another by the governed.

C: activity or movement designed to effect fundamental
changes in the socioeconomic situation.

D: a fundamental change in the way of thinking about or visualizing
something : a change of paradigm <the Copernican revolution>

We must always remember an inconvenient truth… subjection to law requires consequence and force. This should be understood now more than ever, as nearly all nations of the world have been usurped by international Zionists hell-bent on supporting the re-built Kingdom/State of Israel. You may call them the Ashkenazim or “the Jews” – or those who claim to be but are not Jews. You may call them the Edomites or the Synagogue of Satan. You may call them the Freemasons or the Illuminati. You may call them the Royal bloodlines. But there is no real difference. For all of these pseudonyms have but one final and fundamental purpose in their combined doctrines – to reclaim the Kingdom of Jerusalem (Israel) and rebuild the Temple of Solomon (the 3rd Temple of Ezekiel). The blood is the same. The more you blame just one of these groups instead of all of them together as one blood-force, the more their deeds and usurpation go unseen and unpunished. Truly, a revolution of fundamental change in the way we think in America has already happened, brought on by a fundamental change in political organization by international Zionist infiltration, and this is currently well on its way to having the effect of fundamentally changing our socioeconomic situation in every nation. The people are but following their leaders, never suspecting that this bloodline revolution of leadership had already happened before the people who elected them were even born.

This change (revolution) has not been sudden but incremental, as the Talmud and Protocols demand, though quite radical and very closely complete, so as to be virtually unseen like the growing grass. And it has risen up so high that tradition and culture have been usurped and hidden by the tall infection of weeds.

–=–
Constructing An International
Culture Of  Non-Identity

–=–

“The union which we desire to found will not be a French, English,
Irish,
or German union, but a Jewish one, a Universal one!
Other peoples and races are divided into nationalities;
we alone have no co-citizens, but exclusively co-religionaries…”.
“The day is not distant when all the riches and treasures of the
earth
will become the property of the Children of Israel”.

–The Morning Post of London, on Sept. 6, 1920,
by James Rothschild III: Manifesto to all the Jews of the Universe

–=–

https://i1.wp.com/eyeswideblind.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/Racist-Flag.bmpIt is important to note that the “context” of this particular quote is disputed by Zionist
apologists as a mistranslation of a non-public speech. Of course, 100’s of even more horrific
and racist quotes that litter the Talmud and other rabbinical writings in black
and white are also said by Jews to be contextual and misunderstood by the goy.

–=–

It is purely a logical fallacy to consider the forced intermingling of cultures as in any way good. This ridiculous fallacy is that in order to protect pure blood cultures (majorities and minorities), multiculturalism and interbreeding between those races must be a protected and in some countries even a forced privilege (as we will see below). Cross-race marriage is the poster-child of equality and civil rights issues. Without the Jewish/Masonic concept of political equal rights as a political legal status (a fraternal brotherhood of “citizens”), the minority international Jew would never have been able to corrupt and subvert the majority races by taking seats in their governments. And so the “spread of democracy” continues across the globe through war and oppression (law through force), so that all people become equal under government law (equally enslaved by the privilege of law). In this way, the people can be tricked into “democratically electing” a Jewish/Masonic friendly (Zionist) government against the best interests of all people – a single supremest minority ruling the majorities in most countries of the world. If you control the majority with media brainwashing and propaganda, then you can manipulate public opinion and guide that majority to vote for a minority to represent the majority against its interests. This is madness… and this is the way of the international Jew and of the “United Nations” of the world.

So riddle me this… how does cross-race (multicultural) procreation support or preserve one single race and culture? Isn’t this what we are taught by our Zionist government and media? Isn’t this an oxymoron?

Yet in the international Jewish society of all infiltrated nations, it is absolutely forbidden (with devious exceptions) for such marriages between Jews and non-Jews according to the Jewish Talmud and Torah! The royal bloodlines have been interbreeding for many centuries before Christ. Their whole “religion”, eminence, cultural status, and nobility in society and government is based on pure blood. And the negative (Rh-) and positive (Rh+) blood types do not mix well, often causing birth issues via interbreeding from the two bloods rejecting each other. In other words, while the international Zionist governments are passing laws protecting the infiltration and intermarriage of cultures and races into such countries as France, Germany, United States, and Great Britain with its United Kingdom, breaking 1,000’s of years of the proud racial heritage and heredity of those people, the State of Israel and Zionist international Jewry remains pure blood and generally forbids marriage to non-Jews (non-Jewish blood). Even the royal kings and queens must advocate their thrown for this crime of interbreeding with “commoner” blood. When King Edward advocated his throne due to marriage of a Catholic in 1936, he resigned that throne for his future decedents of that tainted marriage as well…

“I, Edward the Eighth of Great Britain, Ireland, and the British Dominions beyond the Seas, King, Emperor of India, do hereby declare my irrevocable determination to renounce the throne for myself and for my descendants, and my desire that effect should be given to the instrument of abdication immediately…”

(Signed) Edward R.I.

What better way to protect the Edomite race and bloodlines than to force racial equality and mingling in every nation – with the exception of their own – until no proud racial majority, cultural ideal, or moral force is left to oppose you?

–=–

–=–


It is indeed ironic that those Jews who were hunted and loathed yesteryear as illegal immigrants in England are today promoting multicultural immigration in all forms to all countries except in their own xenophobic Meca, Israel, which the United Kingdom all but conquered militarily and created for them through treatise and bloodshed.

Now if this sounds “racist” or “prejudiced” to you, you better take off your rose-colored glasses and pay attention. For the ultimate in racist people are ruling you, infiltrating your cultures, and destroying your family unit in favor of their own “race”. This is not a white issue, for white is not a race – and “white” people of European descent have been blamed unilaterally for the actions of this tiny minority of white-skinned Edomites. It was the Jew who created this fallacy, with the German peoples as its poster child. They suck out all culture and values through that little box in your home called a television, for they are CEO’s of all mainstream media outlets. They are the self-proclaimed master race. And if racism is the appreciation and the study of unique races, what happens when there are only two races left to study – the Jew and the diversely molded mixed-slave-race?

–=–

The 12 step program, or how to usurp a nation and its identity:

Step 1 – Immigrate and infiltrate religious, social, and political constructs.

Step 2 – Set up usurious business practices and promote them as normal; create patriotic catchphrases like “free trade”, “free market”, and “capitalism” as you funnel public funds into your corporate usury-based businesses. Replace natural laws with contracts, duty with forced obligations, and natural rights with political privileges and benefits.

Step 3 – Demand equal rights (protections) under law, not natural or earned ones, and subsume all property as State-owned.

Step 4 – Gain international appeal for the cause of equality within a global media network.

Step 5 – Pretend not to be Jewish or disassociate publicly from Zionism to win government seats.

Step 6 – Through usury and debt, take over the economy with undisclosed public funding.

Step 7 – Win a majority of government seats for Jews and non-Jewish Zionists.

Step 8 – Pass laws requiring taxes to be sent to Jewish organizations, campaigns, and to Israel.

Step 9 – Pass hate speech laws and other forms of protections for all forms of religion/race/sex/organization so as to pretend to be a moral group deserving protection, hiding amongst protected classes.

Step 10 – Revise history and pass new laws making race, culture, and morals obsolete except for your own, supporting Israel and no other nation.

Step 11 – Export labor and manufacturing and import consumerism (utilize trade unions, labor laws, and misuse public funds to support these efforts).

Step 12 – Allow and protect illegal immigration; use propaganda to gain immigrant votes (children are citizens); demonize cultural or racial majority as the enemy of immigrants. After a few generations, a new majority appears, conditioned to be Jewish/Zionist friendly.

Step 13 – Repeat in all countries until each is dependent on the other.

Step 14 – Cause international appeal for war against uncooperative or incorruptible nations if above steps don’t work or if opposed (as in Germany), then place new Zionist/corporate friendly governments through martial law.

–=–

–=–
Chronology Of Jewish Deception And Ruination
–=–

How does one exclaim the horrific history of the genocide, torture, rape, and famine that was perpetrated upon over 100 million white Christian farmers and peoples of Europe, Asia, and the Ethiopian Jews of Africa by the Jewish/Zionist Red Army in the “Bolshevik Revolution”, when the fable of the Nazi holocaust that supposedly killed 6 million Jews (a statistically impossible feat) is promoted and reinforced in every form of mainstream media?

In reality, the communism that was forged and implemented in 1917 continues to this day by its Edomite organizers, the international Zionists, under their oppressive regimes and “allied forces”. Inversely, Nazism rose up in response to this horror to protect the Germanic people from that international Zionist scourge, and only lasted from 1933 through 1945.

Of course, World War I was a “family affair”, as all of the countries involved were ruled by the kindred blood cousins of King George V. There was not war, only a bloodline family manipulating the nationalist fervor of each of its kingdoms and forcing commerce within its corporations. This is called “war”.

It is a little known fact that the Jews in Germany identified themselves as Germans before World War II, and were quite content to stay in Germany. They did not wish to become citizens of the new Israel. They were Germans. It was thus necessary for the World Jewish Congress to create a Jewish problem in Germany by declaring a world-wide economic war on Germany and its people by international Jewry, forcing the German people to respond against the German Jews…

https://i0.wp.com/www.jewisheastend.com/Plaque%20Settlement%20Henriques%20St.jpg
War Memorial Plaque of Oxford and St George’s Settlement
(Bernhard Baron House), London – for World War I


1933

https://i0.wp.com/www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/articles/jdecwardayexp.jpg

https://i2.wp.com/upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8f/MSG_III_1937_Anti-Nazi_Rally.jpgAnti-German protest at Madison Square Garden, 1937
Speakers included John L. Lewis, head of the CIO, New York’s Mayor Fiorello LaGuardia,
and Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, head of the American Jewish Congress.


The Ramaz School forms its name from the initials (RMZ) of the
world renownedRabbi Moses Zevulun Margolies, (1851-1936).
“The RaMaZ” was recognized as dean of the American rabbinate.
In 1933, the RaMaZ here addresses a mass rally at Madison Square Garden
protesting the threat to Jews in Nazi Germany.

Stephen S. Wise, later to become president of the World Jewish Congress, speaks at an anti-Nazi rally at Madison Square Garden. New York, United States, March 27, 1933.
Stephen S. Wise, later president of the World Jewish Congress,
speaks at an anti-Nazi rally at Madison Square Garden in 1933


New York Mayor Fiorello La Guardia speaks at Jewish Labor Committee, 1935.
Here with founding members of the JLC, David Dubinsky of the International
Ladies’ Garment Workers Union and B. Charney Vladeck, chairman of the JLC.
Major efforts of this organization include an anti-Nazi boycott and
efforts to reform U.S. immigration laws that excluded refugees. 

You didn’t think he had an airport named after him
just because he was a mayor, did you?

–=–

Most “labor unions” had a Jewish organized criminal origin. For as with all systems of government, the Jew must first take over the foundation of its prey before it can subvert and destroy. Today, high wages caused by union contracts and otherwise high wages are the primary excuse used by Jewish run corporations for exporting American corporations and labor oversees. The number of corporations that are in general Jewish run and funded by goy taxpayer dollars – government being the main shareholder in most national and international corporations – would astound the average American…

–=–

Boycotting The Jewish 500?

Just a small fraction of Jewish owned business and supporters of Zionism (Israel) are listed here:

1. Sears/K Mart – Sears was controlled nearly from its inception by the Julius Rosenwald family, and then by Max Adler, who married Sophie Rosenwald. A Significant number of the company’s shares are still Jewish controlled to this day.
2. The Home Depot – The Home Depot was founded in 1978 by Bernie Marcus, Arthur Blank (Atlanta Falcons), Ron Brill, and Pat Farrah. This is the second largest retailer in America, behind Wal-Mart. The Jewish founders retain substantial holdings in the company.
3. Victoria’s Secret (Les Wexner)
4. The Limited (Les Wexner)
5. Bath & Body Works (Les Wexner)
6. The Men’s Wearhouse ( George Zimmer)
7. Staples Office Supply (Thomas G. Stemberg)
8. Office Depot (Merged with Staples, Thomas G. Stemberg)
9. Bon Ton Stores (Founded by Max Grumbacher) – Also includes the following stores: Elder-Beerman, Parisian, Saks Inc., Bergner’s, Boston Store, Carson Pirie Scott, Herbergers, Younkers, Pomeroy’s, Maxwell’s, Fowler’s Department Store
10. Steve & Barry’s University Sportswear (Steve Shore & Barry Prevor)
11. The Gap (Donald Fisher, founder, holds 37% of stock)
12. Banana Republic (Donald Fisher, founder, holds 37% of stock)
13. Old Navy (Donald Fisher, founder, holds 37% of stock)
14. American Eagle Outfitters (founded 1904 by Edward Beinstein. Current CEO J.L. Schottenstein)
15. ABC Warehouse
16. Circuit City (founded 1949 as Wards Appliance Store by Samuel S. Wurtzel, Jewish)
17. Costco Warehouses (founded 1954 by Sol Price, Jewish, as Fed Mart)
18. Spencer Gifts (Steve Silverstein, CEO. Privately held corporation)
19. Eddy Bauer
20. Starbucks (Howarad D. Schultz, CEO)

GMAC – Owned by Cerberus Capital Management, which is headed by Steve Feinberg.

“…We would also challenge them to consider that AOL allocates 30% of its investment portfolio in Israel. Does that effect how CNN reports on the Israeli/Palestinian conflict? At NileMedia, we think it does. The “spin” wizards at CNN, TIME and AOL are not in the journalism business.” —Nile Media

–=–

In your free time, take a look at these links to get a real feel at how difficult or impossible it would be to boycott Jewish businesses in America and beyond – especially when considering that governments are generally the largest institutional investor and holder of ownership stock and corporate bonds (loans to fund corporations) of these companies. It is ironic that the lavish lifestyle we have come to expect has been supplied by this corporate takeover by Jewish businesses funded by the taxpayer dollars of the world. (See my “CAFR School” articles for more info on this.)

List of Jewish American Businesspeople: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Jewish_American_businesspeople

Boycott of Jewish business: http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=71304

To start with, we’d have to give up much of our internet experience, for on the internet – Google, Youtube, Facebook, MySpace, Wikipedia (or as I like to call it… do-it-yourself history), Yahoo, Ebay, and many others are great supporters of Zionism.

Porn, ABC, NBC, CBS, FOX, HBO, CNN, MSNBC, Hollywood (all mainstream media, movie, and newspaper outlets), Caterpillar, Est’ee Lauder, Johnson and Johnson, Revlon, Kimberly-Clark (Kleenex and Huggies), Apax Partners (Jonny Rockets, Sunglass Hut), Delta Galil (Barbie, Victoria’s Secret, GAP, Banana Republic, Structure, J. Crew, JC Penny, DKNY, Ralph Lauren, Hugo Boss), Timberland, Siemens, Sara Lee (oh, not the cookies!), The Limited, Nokia, Motorola, AT&T (and most phone companies) Bank of America, Wells Fargo, J.P. Morgan Chase… Oh heck, let’s just say all major banks, shall we? Chevron, BP, Exxon… Ok, I suppose all of the major oil corporations as well – No driving either…

And then there’s our food…

To boycott Nestle Corporation for example would be extremely difficult . You’d have to stop using L’Oreal products. It would mean no more Kit Kats, Baby Ruths, or Butterfingers. No Nesquick or Nescafe’ for breakfast. No sweets or cookies from Libby’s. No Carnation products of any kind. No Buitoni oils, pastas, or sauces. And then there is the bottled water market… Arrowhead, Poland Spring, Perrier, San Pellegrino (Perrier’s competitor – LOL), Calistoga (San Pellegrino’s competitor – LOL2), Crystal Geyser, Ice Mountain, Zephyr Hills, Ozarka, Pure Life/Pureza Vital, Deer Park, Aquapod, Nestle’ Brand, and others… all of which are brands of Nestle’. Essentially, all bottled water brands are Zionist Israel friendly. And why not, for in the classic scheme of usury they are selling something that flows freely to a bunch of us nincompoops who pay top dollar for somewhat filtered tap water!

This brings a whole new meaning to the word Sayan:

Sayan (Hebrew: helpers, assistants) is a term used to describe a network of “Jews” living outside of Israel who volunteer to provide assistance to the Israeli Mossad.

In fact, with regards to our consumerism on a global scale of primarily Jewish products, all the people of the world may as well convert to Judaism – not that their blood would be accepted. For we are all a Sayan in our ignorance of our own consumer-based support of Israel.

The “Jewish Achievement” website states:

“The selection of Irving Shapiro to head Dupont Corporation was a watershed moment in the history of Jews as CEOs of major U.S. Corporations. His appointment was seen to have broken a cultural logjam. It made Wall Street Journal headlines on December 14, 1973 and Shapiro was soon regarded as a prominent “business establishment” figure. For many, he was seen as “the first Jew to achieve such stature in a major corporation not founded or purchased by Jews.”

Shapiro’s selection was remarkable on many counts. In the 171 years since its founding by French immigrant Eleuth̩re Ir̩n̩e (E.I.) du Pont in 1802, the Company was headed only by succeeding generations of Dupont family members. Further, Shapiro was neither an entrepreneur, nor was he trained as a manager. He did not, as was common in post World War II America, work his way up the organization chart through the rungs of operational, sales, and staff jobs…”

Remember, the boards of directors of corporations elect the CEO, and the shareholders of stock vote via proxy for the boards of directors. When government’s started gaining in power with their stock portfolios and banding together in “corporate governance”, while also taking over the international governments of the world as leaders, it is no wonder that  a “family company” would suddenly be run by a Jew with no experience or honor. And so it is even more disturbing to note that when a corporation moves to say China, it is the government that is voting to make that happen at the expense of its own people. Literally, government through its proxy shareholder votes often forces this to happen. Even worse, government funds the move and construction costs to export manufacturing by offering corporate bonds from taxpayer money. America is an excellent example of what happens to a people when its government is usurped by the intentional Zionist powers and used against that people to cause them to be in debt and dependance. While it took war to ruin Germany, America has been slowly demolished from the inside – its people too scared to be portrayed as “Nazi’s” for fighting the international Jew that has made them debt slaves.

A brilliant incremental plan of manipulation and take-over, if you ask me…

–=–

DuPont corporation is also a perfect example of the danger of segregating the word “Jew” absent of words like Masonry, royal bloodlines, church, etc, as if they are not connected. For the DuPont family were bloodline cousins of the royal families – of the Plantagenet kings and queens of England and beyond who lost the Kingdom of Jerusalem and created the Magna Carta, The Constitution, and the Declaration of Independence…

Royal Arms of England (1198-1340).svg
Angevins – House of Plantagenet “Coat of Arms”
Founded by: Geoffrey Plantagenet, Count of Anjou
Last Sovereign: Richard III of England

Kingdom of England, Kingdom of France, Lordship of Ireland, Principality of Wales

Religions:
Roman Catholicism (official), Greek Orthodoxy,
Syrian Orthodoxy, Islam, Judaism

Capital City of the Kingdom of Jerusalem: Jerusalem (1099–1187)
Tyre (1187–1191)
Acre (1191–1229)
Jerusalem (1229–1244)
Acre (1244–1291)


Near East in 1135.
The kingdom of Jerusalem and the other Crusader states.
Today, it stands as the reconquered kingdom – the “State” of Israel,
and the bloodlines rule their Kingdom once more.

Read about the Kings of Jerusalem, here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Kings_of_Jerusalem

–=–

Perhaps you’ve noticed this Coat of Arms lion or variations of it (horses, serpents, etc.) on many of the product packages you purchase and consume? Or perhaps you passed over it with a cursory glance…

If you buy cigarettes, you see this:

The family crests for the bloodline royal houses decorate and adorn many products. Here we see the phrase “veni-vidi-vici” under that Masonic royal symbol.

Translated, this is a phrase exclaimed by Julius Caesar which means, “I came – I saw – I conquered”.

Indeed, cigarettes are a crowning achievement in the conquering of the consumer idiocracy, for government has financially funded and invested in the corporations that have addicted all nations while being the regulators of those products.

After it taxes the hell out of the consumer, government then uses those taxpayer monies
to reinvest in the same corporations that make other taxable products!
Government then deceivingly uses reverse psychology as advertising to
justify its allowance of such addictive, harmful, and deadly products.
For government is also heavily invested in the medical and pharmaceutical
industries that treat the illnesses caused from these legal products.
More profits, more taxes, more investments…

–=–

And the people actually defend their addictions as if it were their own free will…

–=–

This is certainly not a new model, for the Honorable East India Company
has been addicting the nations of the world for centuries…
as well-depicted here in the movie “The Rising”

–=–

Coat of Arms for Bristol, England

Coat of Arms for the  House of Stuart which reigned between 1603 and 1688.
Henry VIII made a law mandating the display of the royal coat of arms in all churches.

Coat of Arms of the Netherlands

–=–


Coat of Arms for… a tobacco company?

–=–

And I’m sure alcoholics drink because its their choice…

File:Grand Marnier.svg


Even the enforcement arms of government use the Coat of Arms
The bloodline’s brilliant trinity… Addiction, Taxation, Re-Investment
Government is also heavily invested in the private prison industry!
It profits at every turn, from every angle.

–=–

An easy way to understand how government capitalizes (funds) corporations and stands as major stockholder and bond lender is to simply scan through a typical public pension asset holdings report.

If you want the shock of your life, especially when you consider how many public pension funds there are in the world all controlled by Jewish influenced and infiltrated governments – who vote on issues within these corporations as shareholders like election of board-members and mergers and acquisitions – then take a look at just one report here, from the largest Pension fund in America:

Link–>http://www.calpers.ca.gov/eip-docs/about/pubs/annual-investment-report-2012.pdf

When one single government agency has 15,036,400 shares of EXXON MOBIL CORP with a market value of $1.3 billion dollars (see report), is it any wonder that governments don’t take oil companies to task for their spills? It would be bad for the investment portfolio and cut into government dividends from its stock ownership in EXXON!!!

–=–

The temptation for the average worker to earn higher wages than others as a “privilege” of membership to labor unions was and important key to destroying the economic strength of the people in America. For as the Jew knows all to well… there can be no lavish wealth without equally lavish inequity and poverty. By first establishing equal rights, it was then able to grant special rights and privileges through license to only certain workers, creating a purposeful wealth and class-structure within otherwise skill-less men. And it succeeded in turning slaves into house-slaves; men that would literally fight for their union benefits to the death against their starving brethren. The laborers know that unless others are not protected as they are in their labor unions, they would not earn higher wages for doing the same types of jobs as others. This carrot on a stick ironically created class distinctions even among skill-less laborers.  Its the golden rule – wealth requires poverty. For without poverty, wealth simply cannot be measured. And this is the razor sharp edge of how equality destroys. The establishment of inequality requires the forced endowment of equal rights as a legal status by government, for legal equality (civil rights) takes away all individual liberty and gives power to the representatives of a uniformly equal citizenry – one voice for the entirety of all individuals who give up all personal rights to the group (community), while actually believing that equality is a good thing. Again, how else can the international Jew become equal and protected in all societies and in its organized crime, subversion, and then usurpation of representative (legislative) positions in government (thus controlling the nation), without first forcing legal equality and civil rights that protect the Jew in countries where throughout history the Jew has been exiled? This horrific transformation and corruption of morals and culture allowed the Zionist power of the international Jew first as protected, then as equal, and now as elite.

But this equality is not real – it is not in the hearts and minds of men – for it is nothing but a legal status. It is a piece of paper that the people of Germany realized all to well must be torn to shreds in order to route out the literal parasites who created it.

Equal rights is literally the socialist destruction of all cultures around the world. For this type of equality is not earned but granted without merit. This is not real equality of the heart, but is a false status forced upon all people by force. It is actually another name for slavery. So, where for centuries this Synagogue of Satan has been physically and violently removed and exiled from nations and lands far and wide, it now rests comfortably as a protected and equal religion, a protected and equal false “race”, and the ruler of all of those nations and peoples it once fled in fear from.

Wikipedia states:

Fiorello La Guardia’s mother, Irene Coen, was a Jew from Trieste, the Austro-Hungarian Empire; his maternal grandmother Fiorina Luzzatto Coen was a “Luzzatto”, a member of the prestigious Italian-Jewish family of scholars, kabbalists, and poets and including the famous rabbi Samual David Luzzatto. La Guardia was elected mayor of New York City on an anti-corruption Fusion ticket during the Great Depression, which united him in an alliance with New York’s Jewish population and liberal bluebloods (WASPs). In 1937, speaking before the Women’s Division of the American Jewish Congress, La Guardia called for the creation of a special pavilion at the upcoming New York World’s Fair “a chamber of horrors” for “that brown-shirted fanatic“. La Guardia’s sister, Gemma La Guardia Gluck, was arrested by the Germans in a roundup of Jews in Hungary in 1944. She was held under privileged conditions at Ravensbrück concentration camp and released after the war. David Rockefeller became La Guardia’s “secretary” for eighteen months in a “dollar a year” public service position, filling the office of the deputy mayor. In 1941, President Roosevelt appointed La Guardia as the director of the new Office of Civilian Defense (OCD).

–=–

Program for a counter-Olympics held in Randall's Island, New York, in August 1936. The event was sponsored by the Amateur Athletic Union, the American Federation of Labor, the Jewish Labor Committee, and New York City Mayor Fiorello LaGuardia.
Program for a counter-Olympics held in Randall’s Island, New York, in August 1936.
It was sponsored by the Amateur Athletic Union, the American Federation of Labor,
the Jewish Labor Committee, and New York City Mayor Fiorello LaGuardia.
(USHMM #14921/Jewish Labor Committee Collection, New York University)

This cartoon appeared in <i>The Jewish Chronicle</i>, July 10, 1936. The text, laden with sarcasm, says: “Nazis are officially instructed to be courteous to Jews from June 30 to September 1 so that visitors to the Olympic Games may take away a good impression. 1) It is forbidden to bump Jews with iron bars without first saying excuse me. 2) It is forbidden to kick Jewesses in tramcars without first rising and offering your seat.”
This cartoon appeared in The Jewish Chronicle, July 10, 1936.
“Nazis are officially instructed to be courteous to Jews from June 30 to September 1
so that visitors to the Olympic Games may take away a good impression.”

Maintaining the illusion of the “evil German Nazi” was difficult and, like the holocaust,
had to be explained away when the fallacy was visibly rebutted –
Here, fallacy is being promoted that the Nazis are not on good behavior at all times,
but only at the Olympics because they are on film or will be witnessed. Ironically, they are only evil
when there are no real witnesses to corroborate the Jewish stories…

–=–

File:1936 World Jewish Congress First Plenary Assembly Geneva.jpg
First Plenary Assembly of the World Jewish Congress in Geneva, August 1936
This is world organized crime in the making.

File:1948 World Jewish Congress Montreux - 1.jpg
Delegates at the Second Plenary Assembly of the
World Jewish Congress in Montreux, Switzerland, June 1948

https://i2.wp.com/www.loc.gov/exhibits/haventohome/images/hh0183s.jpg
President Truman signs United States recognition of the “State” of Israel

File:World Jewish Congress - Third Plenary Assembly - Geneva 1953.jpg
Third Plenary Assembly of the World Jewish Congress,
Geneva, Switzerland, 4-11 August 1953

https://i2.wp.com/upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/96/1975_WJC_Sixth_Plenary_Assembly_Jerusalem.jpg/330px-1975_WJC_Sixth_Plenary_Assembly_Jerusalem.jpg
Nahum Goldman addressing the Sixth WJC Plenary in Jerusalem in 1975.
Seated on the right: Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin

–=–
The Jewish newspaper Natscha Retsch wrote:

“The war against Germany will be waged by all Jewish communities, conferences, congresses… by every individual Jew. Thereby the war against Germany will ideologically enliven and promote our interests, which require that Germany be wholly destroyed. The danger for us Jews lies in the whole German people, in Germany as a whole as well as individually. It must be rendered harmless for all time…. In this war we Jews have to participate, and this with all the strength and might we have at our disposal.”

**Note: This is racism, also known as eugenics

This Jewish declaration of war and boycott preceded Hitler’s infamous speech of March 28, 1933, which was purely a defensive rebuttal of this declaration of economic war by international Zionism. It was certainly and rightly labeled as a “Jewish problem”.

The Balfour Declaration of 1917 committed the British government to ‘view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people’ – as long as this did not ‘prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine’.

Vladimir Jabotinsky, founder of the Irgun Zvai Leumi terrorist organisation, wrote in the January 1934 issue of Mascha Rjetach:

“For months now the struggle against Germany is waged by each Jewish community at each conference in all our syndicates and by each Jew all over the world. There is reason to believe that our part in this struggle has general value. We will start a spiritual and material war of all the world against Germany’s ambitions to become once again a great nation, to recover lost territories and colonies. But our Jewish interests demand Germany’s total destruction, collectively and individually. The German nation is a threat to us Jews.’

Emil Ludwig Cohen wrote in his book The New Holy Alliance, Strasburg, 1938:

“Even if Hitler at the last moment would want to avoid war which would destroy him he will, in spite of his wishes, be compelled to wage war.”

Bernard Lechache wrote in The Right to Live (December 1938):

“It is our task to organize the moral and cultural blockade of Germany and disperse this nation. It is up to us to start a merciless war.

The Jewish newspaper Central Blad Voor Israeliten in Nederlands printed on 13 September 1939:

“The millions of Jews living in America, England, France, North Africa and South, not forgetting Palestine, have decided to carry on the war in Germany to the very end. It is to be a war of extermination.

The Toronto Star (26 February 1940) printed a declaration of a Rabbi Perlberg, Director of the British section of the Jewish World Congress:

“The Jewish World Congress is in a state of war with Germany for seven years.”

The Jewish magazine Sentinel of Chicago printed in its issue of October 8th, 1940:

“When the National Socialists and their friends cry or whisper that this [war] is brought about by Jews, they are perfectly right.”

And now, the United Nations has been established and is used to declare an international military or economic war with any who do not cooperate with the International Jew. The term “United Nations” gains much more sympathy than the term “World Jewish Congress”, now doesn’t it? And the people of the nations have no idea that their nations were sold.

–=–

Now that international Jewry had instigated an economic war, we see the true
historical perspective of why Germany then defensively boycotted Jewish businesses…

–=–

The one-day German Boycott of April 1, 1933

This was partially a reprisal and an act of revenge against
Gruelpropaganda (atrocity stories) that German and foreign Jews,
assisted by foreign journalists, were allegedly circulating in the
international press to damage Nazi Germany’s reputation…
The organized world Jewish population of every nation against Germany…

The Star of David (Solomon’s Seal) was painted in yellow and black across thousands of
doors and windows, with accompanying anti-commerce slogans against Jews. Signs were
posted saying “Don’t Buy from Jews” and “The Jews Are Our Misfortune.

This is nothing when considering that Jews were openly declaring Germany’s
and the German people’s individual annihilation and extermination.


Note: this is a German businessman, not a soldier.

The German people stood with the Nazi without fear,
for their country and way of life was at stake from within and without.

In 1920, Hitler stated:

 “This Jewish contamination will not subside, this poisoning of the nation will not end,
until the carrier himself, the Jew, has been banished.”

–The War Path: Hitler’s Germany 1933-1939 from an August 1920 speech in Salzburg

–=–

It is clear that no one can argue with this insightful premonition – regardless of your opinion of this man – and that now we certainly have a world-wide poisoning and infection of all nations. Indeed, this type of boycott should be the scene in America for every business that hires illegal workers at illegal poverty wages and for every /Israel supporting corporation (which is most of them), for history shows that non-violent boycotts work all too well. And this would recognize the destruction of world Jewish power over the people, if the people would simply stop supporting and feeding their own parasites.

But the people watch TV provided by the Jew to entertain, distract, and sell to the goy Jewish “Kosher” products…

Also note that the word “banished” is used here by Hitler. For the Jew had been banished from many nations before poisoning Germany’s well. The notion of the holocaust is a fiction by Jews as we will see later, which covers up the real holocaust of the Jewish run Red Army in Russia. Hitler’s  “Final Solution” was a transfer agreement for deportation of Jews to Palestine in agreement with the Jewish Congress, not their extermination. And this was the goal for the Jewish Congress from the beginning. Even today, Israel offers 10’s of thousands of shekels for Iranian Jews to immigrate to Israel. But like the German Jews, the Iranian Jews identify as Iranians, not Israelis. In this way, Iran is the New Germany.

Fortunately, the Germans and the Red Cross kept meticulous records of this and the true livelihood of Jews in camps – including 100’s upon 100’s of live births. This is so obviously contrary to the concept of extermination… that is, the birth of more Jews and the care they received in state of the art hospitals in the “camps” contradicts the fallacious thought that Jews were being “gassed” and exterminated. A little logic goes a long way!

Hitler’s first response was defensive, not offensive – a single day of boycotting Jewish businesses in Germany in retaliation to the Jewish led boycott by world Jewry in March of 1933. The German economy was already in shambles, and an international boycott on German goods was a literal declaration of war by the international Zionist’s who sought its destruction and the exportation of German Jews to Palestine (leading to the “Transfer Agreement”). This response by Germans was as pathetic a reaction as is happening today, around the world, toward this international Zionist power and its deprivation of world-wide culture and society – the unseen enemy of all men.

An International Jewish Boycott Conference was later held in Amsterdam to coordinate the ongoing boycott campaign, part of the newly proclaimed “World Jewish Economic Federation” (WJEF).

Samuel Untermyer, elected president of the WJEF, delivered this speech on BBC radio, a transcript of which was printed in The New York Times on August 7, 1933, calling for a “sacred war” against Germany:

“When the tale is told… the world will confront a picture so fearful in its barbarous cruelty that the hell of war and the alleged Belgian atrocities pale into insignificance as compared to this devilishly, deliberately, cold-bloodedly planned and already partially executed campaign for the extermination of a proud, gentle, loyal, law-abiding people.. The Jews are the aristocrats of the world. From time immemorial they have been persecuted and have seen their persecutors come and go. They alone have survived. And so will history repeat itself, but that furnishes no reason why we should permit this reversion of a once great nation to the Dark Ages or fail to rescue these 600,000 human souls from the tortures of hell… What we are proposing and have already gone far toward doing, is to prosecute a purely defensive economic boycott that will undermine the Hitler regime and bring the German people to their senses by destroying their export trade on which their very existence depends… We propose to and are organizing world opinion to express itself in the only way Germany can be made to understand…”

Chaim Weizmann, president of both the international “Jewish Agency” and of the World Zionist Organization (and later Israel’s first president), told British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain in a letter published in The London Times on September 6th, 1939 that:

“I wish to confirm, in the most explicit manner, the declarations which I and my colleagues have made during the last month, and especially in the last week, that the Jews stand by Great Britain and will fight on the side of the democracies. Our urgent desire is to give effect to these declarations [against Germany]. We wish to do so in a way entirely consonant with the general scheme of British action, and therefore would place ourselves, in matters big and small, under the coordinating direction of His Majesty’s Government. The Jewish Agency is ready to enter into immediate arrangements for utilizing Jewish manpower, technical ability, resources, etc.”

In other words, international Jewry became the army of Great Britain and subject of the crown, with the goal of establishing Israel – the goal of all involved. That included the German Jews residing in Germany…

Rsgba
A man in the Jewish Brigade, a segment of the British Army
that fought the Germans in Italy in 1944. The rocket says “Hitler’s Gift”.


Jew Oscar Westreich left Berlin and gained a new identity in Palestine.
He eventually joined the British army, whose training of Jewish soldiers proved
crucial to the formation of Israel, as his daughter, Mira Bar-Hillel, explains.
It was British forces who, through this international alliance with the Synagogue of Satan,
forcefully “reconquered” the land of Palestine to claim and re-create the Kingdom of Jerusalem.
And the Temple of Solomon is now ready to be rebuilt.

For unknown to most people, the Star of David is actually the Seal of Solomon.
And the founding of Israel is to Rebuild his 3rd Temple
and reclaim the Kingdom of Jerusalem.

“Set me as a seal upon thy heart”
Song of Solomon 8:6

–=–
Genocide Of Semetics By Ashkenazim
–=–


Jewish immigrant from Ethiopia at Ben Gurion International Airport,
October 29, 2012. Israel recently passed a law banning undocumented
immigrants from sending money out of Israel.

–=–

It is ironic that most people would not consider a black Jew.

It is also the consequence of claiming a Jewish homeland while posing as a Semitic people that ALL JEWS must be allowed to immigrate into Israel. This fact has lead to the severe mistreatment, murder, and genocide by the Ashkenazim against the true Semitic peoples of the world.

Thus, we must consider the illegal “State” of Israel is the enemy of the true Jewish people – the actual Semite lines – which are the black African and Arab people of darker skin. These white Ashkenazim Edomites are the royal bloodlines, the kings and queens, the Order.

One aspect of this age-old genocidal attack on the true Semitic peoples was recently reported upon in Israel by Harretz:

“An inconceivable crime…

Israel’s patronizing and inhumane treatment of Ethiopian women is nothing new.

It’s hard to believe, but in Israel, in 2012, Ethiopian women are forced to receive injections of the Depo-Provera contraceptive. This injection is not a commonly prescribed means of contraception. It is considered a last resort and is usually given to women who are institutionalized or developmentally disabled.”

Source–> http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/an-inconveivable-crime.premium-1.484110

Time Magazine reported in March, 2013, about this Ashkenazim imposed racism against the true Semites:

Israeli Deputy Health Minister Yaakov Litzman has called for an investigation into the reported administering of Depo-Provera contraceptive shots to Ethiopian immigrant women without consent. Depo-Provera is a progestrogin-only contraceptive that is administered every three months through injection. According to Dr. Paula Franklin of Marie Stopes International who spoke with TIME, it is a “safe, medium-term reversible hormonal contraceptive” that is used around the world by women of “informed consent.” However, countless Ethiopian women have reportedly been given this contraceptive without understanding or consent.

The news that Ethiopian women were being injected with Depo-Provera, a contraceptive shown to have links with bone loss, emerged in December 2012 following a documentary by Israeli journalist Gal Gabai. In her short film titled Where Did the Children Disappear to, Gabai revealed that, in the past decade, the birthrate among Ethiopian immigrants had decreased by 50%, writes the Jewish Daily Forward. She discovered that women were denied proper family-planning counseling or an outline of birth control methods from medical staff, while others were informed that their entry into Israel would be blocked if they refused to take the contraceptive, notes the Guardian. Many had no idea what they were being injected with. In the documentary, Gabai offers two possible explanations — either it is “an intention to do good, to prevent poverty and to help with the adjustment to Western urbanized living,” or it’s an “economic calculation to reduce immigration and absorption costs.” “This story reeks of racism, paternalism and arrogance,” Gabai told viewers during the broadcast on Israeli Educational Television.

https://i2.wp.com/www.loc.gov/exhibits/haventohome/images/hh0194s.jpgMoorish Zionist [sic] Temple in Harlem, New York, taken in 1929 by James Van Der Zee,
acclaimed African American photographer who chronicled the Harlem Renaissance.
Note that the American flag and a flag of Zion appear next to one another.
–=–

File:1957 WJC meeting with Mitterrand in Paris.jpgFrench Justice Minister François Mitterrand (left) and leaders of
the World Jewish Congress at a meeting in Paris in June 1957

http://i2.wp.com/www.loonwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/sarkozy-avec-kepa.jpg?resize=320%2C219
France – President Nicolas Sarkozy
Sarkozy with Menorah
France – President Nicolas Sarkozy

France – President Nicolas Sarkozy

–=–
Forced Integration By Law
–=–

In December of 2008, Sarkozy made a disturbing speech. The Brussels Journal reports:

“Recently Nicolas Sarkozy announced plans to pursue a vigorous policy of diversity and métissage. Concretely, this means giving preference to minorities in job hiring and prosecuting those who do not comply. In other words, affirmative action as a government policy from which none are exempt.

In his message Sarkozy insisted that the French people must change, that there will be dire consequences if they don’t, and that not to intermarry racially is bad for the survival of the country. Thus he amalgamated the concepts of preference for minorities in job hiring with that of the need for the French to intermarry racially.”

(Source–>http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/3764)

Some translated excerpts from that speech:

“(…) the objective is to meet the challenge of “métissage” – the challenge of “métissage” that the 21st century is confronting us with. The challenge of “métissage”, France has always been familiar with it, and by meeting the challenge of “métissage” France remains faithful to her history. Moreover, it is consanguinity that has always provoked the end of civilizations and societies.

The verb “métisser” theoretically means to mix blood or to crossbreed, but at times it is used more loosely to mean mix cultures. Sarkozy uses the word, or a form of it, at least 7 times in the first few seconds of his speech.

Other meanings for the word “métisser”?

Take your pick…

“Crossbreeding”; “racial mixing”; “miscegenation”; “mongrelisation” and “bastardisation”.

At the conclusion, Sarkosy stated:

“Ladies and Gentlemen, this is the last thing: If republican will power does not function, it will be necessary for the Republic to resort to even more forcible methods… But we don’t have a choice. Diversity at the base of the country must be reflected by diversity at the head of the country… It is not a choice. It is an obligation. It is an imperative. We cannot do otherwise at the risk of finding ourselves faced with considerable problems… We must change, so we will change.”

Note that Sarkosy is born of a French mother and a Hungarian Jewish father…

–=–


France – President Francois Hollande


France – Bernard Kouchner, Foreign Minister


Georgia – President Mikheil Saakashvili


Georgia – President Mikheil Saakashvili


Germany – Chancellor Angela Merkel at Yad Vashem, Israel


Germany – Chancellor Angela Merkel


Germany – Chancellor Angela Merkel with Netanyahu (and Bush)

–=–
The Zionist Planned Genocide Of Germany
–=–

It was an amazingly brilliant piece of public relations gumption to have perverted history into making Germany out to be the bad guy. The Jewish plan to exterminate the German people was present in World War 1 and Bolshevism, carried over to World War 2, and will no doubt culminate in World War 3.

Mark Weber exposes the historical goals of international Zionism and Jewry:

Photobucket
Germany Must Perish!
by Theodore N. Kaufman, Newark, N.J., Argyle press, Copyright 1941
Library of Congress Call No.: DD222.K3

–=–

Begin Excerpt:

Theodore N. Kaufman, the author of Germany Must Perish, was a Manhattan-born Jewish businessman who was also chairman of a group that called itself the “American Federation for Peace.” The first edition of this slim volume was published in 1940 or early 1941. A second, 96-page edition, which sold for 25 cents, was published in 1941 by Argyle Press of Newark, New Jersey. Both editions were issued when the United States was still officially neutral, that is, before the Pearl Harbor attack of December 7, 1941, that brought the U.S. openly into World War II.

Kaufman’s fervent proposal for the systematic sterilization of the entire German population was given respectful attention in the American press, including reviews in a number of newspapers. A review in the weekly Time magazine, March 24, 1941, called Kaufman’s plan a “sensational idea.”

Germany’s propaganda chief, Joseph Goebbels, seized with delight on the book. “This Jew [Kaufman] has done a disservice to the enemy,” Goebbels privately commented. “If he had composed the book at my behest he couldn’t have done a better job.”

At his direction the German press played up Kaufman’s call for genocide. A front page article about the book in the Berlin daily Der Angriff, July 23, 1941, appeared under headlines that called it a “Diabolical Plan for the Extermination of the German People” and a work of “Old Testament Hatred.” Extracts also appeared, for example, in the nationally-circulated weekly paper Das Reich, August 3, 1941.

A plan similar to Kaufman’s was issued during the war years by a prominent American anthropologist. In an article headlined “Breed War Strain Out of Germans” in the New York daily newspaper P.M., January 4, 1943, Ernest Hooton laid out an “outbreeding” plan that would “destroy German nationalism and aggressive ideology while retaining and perpetuating desirable German biological and sociological capacities.” (See also: Benjamin Colby, ‘Twas a Famous Victory, 1974, p. 131.)

The Harvard University professor’s proposal called for genetically transforming the German nation by encouraging mating of German women with non-German men, who would be brought into the country in large numbers, and of German men, forcibly held outside of Germany, with non-German women. Ten to twelve million German men would be assigned to forced labor under Allied supervision in countries outside of Germany to rebuild their economies. “The objects of this measure,” wrote Dr. Hooton, “include reduction of the birthrate of ‘pure’ Germans, neutralization of German aggressiveness by outbreeding and denationalization of indoctrinated individuals.”

This plan, Hooton estimated, would require at least 20 years to be implemented. “During this period,” he went on, “encourage also the immigration and settlement in the German states of non-German nationals, especially males.”

In the decades since the end of World War II, something of the spirit of the genocidal Kaufman and Hooton plans seems manifest in Germany’s population and immigration policies. Since the nation’s defeat in 1945, the German birth rate has fallen to below the replacement level, millions of racially and culturally alien migrants have been welcomed as settlers in Germany, the number of children of mixed ethnicity has sharply increased, and the ethnic-cultural character of much of the country has been drastically altered, especially in the larger cities.

This dynamic volume outlines a comprehensive plan for the extinction of the German nation and the total eradication from the earth, of all her people. Also contained herein is a map illustrating the possible territorial dissection of Germany and the apportionment of her lands…

End Excerpt

You may read the text of the publication “Germany Must Perish” on Weber’s sight, here:
http://ironlight.wordpress.com/2010/04/22/mainstream-jewish-pre-war-outline-for-german-extermination/

–=–


Greece – Georgios Papandreou in Yad Vashem, Israel


Holland – Queen Beatrix

Hungarian PM with kippa
Hungary – Prime Minister Ferenc Gyurcsany

File:ViktorOrban-WorldJewishCongress-Budapest2013.jpg
Hungary – Prime Minister Viktor Orbán addressing the opening dinner of
the Plenary Assembly of the World Jewish Congress in Budapest, 5 May 2013
The newly elected Jewish World Congress for 2013

–=–

From the World Jewish Congress website and its 2013 meeting in Budapest, Hungary:

Delegates also elected Baron David de Rothschild from France as the new chairman of the WJC Governing Board, which is the highest decision-making body between plenary assemblies. Chella Safra from Brazil was named as the new treasurer of the organization and will oversee the financial management of the WJC. Moshe Kantor, the president of the European Jewish Congress, was elected as chairman of the WJC Policy Council, and Mervyn Smith from South Africa will be the co-chairman. The Policy Council advises the Executive Committee on matters of policy, programming and the implementation of the mission of the World Jewish Congress.

The Plenary Assembly also changed the WJC Constitution to ensure that the sitting senior lay leaders of the 12 largest Jewish communities in the world Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Hungary, Russia, South Africa. Ukraine, United States of America) automatically have a seat on the new WJC Executive

The (2013) gathering in Budapest was notably addressed by Hungarian Prime Minister Victor Orbán, who said that “anti-Semitism today in Hungary is unacceptable, and we will show zero tolerance in regards to it.” Introducing Orbán, Ronald Lauder called on Hungary and the government to do more against growing anti-Semitism, notably coming from the extreme-right Jobbik party.

Mazsihisz President Péter Feldmájer said in his speech at the opening dinner: “I believe that the Jews of the world must unite their forces. This day also shows us that we are not alone, we are all listening to each other no matter where we may be living across the globe. The task we have is no little one to handle.

Germany’s Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle said in his keynote address on Monday, which was received with a standing ovation by the delegates: “Anti-Semitism has no place neither in Berlin, nor in Budapest, nor anywhere else in Europe or in the world… We are firmly committed to protecting and nourishing Jewish life in our societies and to countering anti-Semitism across the globe. We have to tackle the root causes of anti-Semitism.”

Discussions about effective ways to combat the rise of neo-Nazi parties in Europe took center-stage in Budapest, and the Plenary Assembly adopted a resolution which called on Hungary “to recognize that Jobbik and its subsidiaries “pose a fundamental threat to Hungary’s democracy” and that “decisive action … must now be taken to take effective measures including by enacting and enforcing legislation, for the protection of all citizens and residents of this country, in particular vulnerable minorities such as the Roma and the Jews, against threats of violence, racist hate and insults and the denial of the Holocaust.”

The WJC also urged national leaders and legislators in Europe to join the 125 legislators from more than 40 countries in signing the London Declaration on Combating Anti-Semitism.”

(Source–>http://www.worldjewishcongress.org/en/news/13476/world_jewish_congress_plenary_assembly_in_budapest)

–=–


Italy – Prime Minister Silivio Berlusconi


Italy – Prime Minister Silivio Berlusconi


Italy – Foreign Minister Gianfranco Fini


Italy – Foreign Minister Gianfranco Fini


Italian Prime Minister Mario Monti at the
Council on Foreign Relations in New York on Sept. 27.

Italy’s prime minister promised Italian Jews he would stand beside them in the fight against anti-Semitism and Holocaust denial.

“We know that anti-Semitism has not been eradicated in Europe,” Italian Prime Minister Mario Monti said at a ceremony Tuesday night marking the 69th anniversary of the World War II round-up and deportation of 1,024 Roman Jews to Auschwitz. “We will not leave you alone.”

Monti, who was joined by Rome’s mayor, several government ministers and other officials, spoke before several thousand people gathered outside Rome’s Great Synagogue to mark the anniversary. Earlier, many had taken part in a torchlight memorial march through the city.

Monti promised that the government would act against mounting racial prejudice and xenophobia in Europe.”

Source–>http://www.jewishjournal.com/world/article/italian_prime_minister_says_he_will_stand_by_countrys_jews

And you thought Italy was an Italian and Catholic nation?

“Holocaust denial” is code for people who present actual provable, historical facts that disprove the outrageous claims that 6 million Jews were placed into mythical ovens in concentration camps during World War II – or that any were cooked at all. The immediate response is to build a straw-man argument that the presenter of these facts is “anti-Semitic” thereby bypassing the facts and using ad hominem fallacy to attack the messenger instead of acknowledging the fact that cannot be dis-proven. This is a classic elicitation used by attorneys. To elicit something means the use of trickery and word magic to obtain something not due. Again, the term “Jewish” was added to the definition of Semitic last century, and so the use of that word is fallacious from the start!

What is a Semite?

  1. A member of a group of Semitic-speaking peoples of the Near East and northern Africa, including the Arabs, Arameans, Babylonians, Carthaginians, Ethiopians, Hebrews, and Phoenicians.

A Semite is defined here as of Arab and even African decent. And the Hebrews were of darker skin. Therefore, to say one is anti-Semetic would mean that one is anti-Arab, anti-Black African, and anti-Hebrew. But only in the last 100 years has this term been hijacked and used to describe a strictly anti-Jewish connotation.

The term Sephardim includes most Mizrahi Jews, and in Israel this term sometimes means any Jew who is not Ashkenazim. Sephardi Jews are of Arab decent, and many have the semblance of the Spanish people due to their historic settlement and commingling in areas inside and around Spain.

Jews who came from Eastern Europe and Russia are called Ashkenazim.

But are these people really Semetic, or just pretending?

This question is answered later in this presentation…

The name Ashkenaz was first used in the Middle Ages for Jews living along the Rhine River in northern France and western Germany. Many of these Jews later migrated eastward and formed communities in Germany, Poland, Austria, Eastern Europe and Russia between the 10th and 19th centuries. Ashkenazic Jews developed their own language, Yiddish, by combining Hebrew with German. Likewise, they developed a distinct culture by combining Jewish culture with the culture of the countries in which they lived.

The white-skinned Ashkenazim even claim anti-Semetism as a trick – an ad hominem fallacious attack on the messenger, not the message.

But don’t take my word for it, let them tell you the truth:

–=–

http://i0.wp.com/www.loonwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/koizumi_yarmulke.jpg?resize=294%2C350
Japan – Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi, Western wall

Montenegro – Prime Minister Igor Luksic


Norway – Former Prime Minister Gro-Harlem-Brundtland,
Former Brazilian President Fernando Henrique Cardoso,
Former United States President Jimmy Carter,
Former Irish President Mary Robinson,
South African Archbishop Emeritus Desmond Tutu

–=–
From Israel To Palestine And Back Again:
Radioactively
Poetic Justice
–=–

The Sunday Times front-page report published on June 19, 1977,  first revealed to the world that Israeli authorities had been torturing Palestinian prisoners, that this torture was “widespread and systematic,” and that it “appears to be sanctioned at some level as deliberate policy.” At the time Israeli officials and Jewish-Zionist leaders in the United States protested the Sunday Times revelations, and denied the charge. Later, though, Israeli torture of prisoners was independently verified by Amnesty International, and other organizations.

–=–

Israel is working on an “ethnically targeted” biological weapon that would kill or harm Arabs but not Jews, according to Israeli military and western intelligence sources cited in a front-page report in the London Sunday Times, November 15, 1998 (“Israel Planning ‘Ethnic’ Bomb as Saddam Caves In,” by Uzi Mahnaimi and Marie Colvin).

In developing this “ethno-bomb,” the British paper went on, Israeli scientists are trying to exploit medical advances by identifying distinctive genes carried by some Arabs, and then create a genetically modified bacterium or virus. The goal is to use the ability of viruses and certain bacteria to alter the DNA inside the host’s living cells. The scientists are trying to engineer deadly microorganisms that attack only those bearing the distinctive genes.

The secret Israel program is based at the Institute for Biological Research in Nes Tsiona, a small town southeast of Tel Aviv, the main research facility for Israel’s clandestine arsenal of chemical and biological weapons.

(Source–>http://ironlight.wordpress.com/2010/04/21/israels-ethno-biological-weapons/)

–=–

The price of this Jewish supremacy, racism, arrogance, lies, and torture?

Self-destruction…

As printed at the Salem-News.com:

“(TEL AVIV / SALEM) – Israel’s population is facing a dire threat: a drastic depopulation, from the use of weapons that leave behind Depleted Uranium (DU). Depleted Uranium leads to the word Omnicidal, as DU kills everything in the food chain, everywhere the wind blows. Experts say the dramatic drop in Israel’s sperm count could eliminate their ability to reproduce.

Research by an Israeli doctor shows a significant drop in sperm count level and sperm motility among young Israeli soldiers in recent years. Sperm motility is the ability of sperm to move properly toward an egg.

It is attributed to the inhalation of DU aerosolized nano-particles; the dirty results of extra powerful weapons used by Israel and the U.S.

All of that military might as it turns out, could set the stage for a massive Israeli act of population suicide.

A study by Dr. Ronit Haimov-Kokhman released in November, showed a 40-percent decline in the concentration of sperm cells in Israeli sperm donors from 2004 to 2008, compared to samples taken between 1995 and 1999.

Sperm banks in Israel are now reportedly turning away as many as two-thirds of potential donors, due to the low-quality sperm. In the past, around one-third of the potential donors were turned away…”

–=–

In the name of genocide and depopulation of the Palestinian/Arab/Semitic peoples by Zionism and Israel, including the unleashed power of the United States military as its useful idiot for which it holds the reigns, I offer my heartfelt grief, sorrow, and regret that my own people remain complacent and weak. And though I know it is my blood enemy, I am saddened at this God-sent and ironic justice being delivered upon the Ashkenazim carpetbaggers who have occupied, stolen, and killed Palestine and her people.

But we are talking about the international Jewish problem, so let’s continue with the rest of the world…

–=–

–=–


Peru – Former President Alejandro Toledo, World Jewish Congress

File:2008 World Jewish Congress Delegation meets with Polish PM Donald Tusk.jpg
Poland – World Jewish Congress Delegation meets with
Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk in Warsaw, June 2008


Poland – Prime Minister Donald Tusk at Western Wall

Donald Tusk at Wailing Wall


Poland – President Lech Kaczynski


Portugal – Jose Barrosso


European Union – Jose Barrosso is now the
appointed President of the “European Commission”
European People’s Party (EPP)


European Union – Jose Barrosso


European Parliament President Hans-Gert Poettering
with chief rabbi of Tel Aviv, Yisrael Meir Lau


European Commission President Romano Prodi


Portugal – President Aníbal Cavaco Silva, at the Lisbon synagogue


Portugal – President Jorge Sampaio, Lisbon synagogue


Russia – President Dmitry Medvedev

http://i1.wp.com/www.loonwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/putin_yarmulke.jpg?resize=340%2C311
Russian prime minister Vladimir Putin

Putin at Moscow's Jewish Museum.

–=–
Putin On Russia’s Jewish Bolshevism Government
–=–

Haaretz reports:

“Russian President Vladimir Putin said that at least 80 percent of the members of the first Soviet government were Jewish.

“I thought about something just now: The decision to nationalize this library was made by the first Soviet government, whose composition was 80-85 percent Jewish,” Putin said June 13 during a visit to Moscow’s Jewish Museum and Tolerance Center.

Putin was referencing the library of Rabbi Joseph I. Schneerson, the late leader of the Chabad-Lubavitch movement. The books, which are claimed by Chabad representatives in the United States, began being moved to the museum in Moscow this month.

According to the official transcription of Putin’s speech at the museum, he went on to say that the politicians on the predominantly Jewish Soviet government “were guided by false ideological considerations and supported the arrest and repression of Jews, Russian Orthodox Christians, Muslims and members of other faiths. They grouped everyone into the same category.

“Thankfully, those ideological goggles and faulty ideological perceptions collapsed. And today, we are essentially returning these books to the Jewish community with a happy smile.”

Widely seen as the first Soviet government, the Council of People’s Commissars was formed in 1917 and comprised 16 leaders, including chairman Vladimir Lenin, foreign affairs chief Leon Trotsky and Joseph Stalin, who was in charge of the People’s Commissariat of Nationalities.”

(Source–>http://www.haaretz.com/jewish-world/jewish-world-news/putin-first-soviet-government-was-mostly-jewish-1.530857)

–=–


Serbia – President Boris Tadic visiting Israel


South Africa – former South African President Nelson Mandela with Gill Marcus and
Professor Michael Katz, President of the South African Jewish Board of Deputies (SAJBD).
African National Congress, December 1990


South Africa – (top) Nelson Mandela and Jewish Communist leader Joe Slovo.
(bottom) – NAACP President Kivie Kaplan posing with Martin Luther King Jr.


South Africa – President Jacob Zuma meets with Irwin Cotler,
former Canadian Justice Minister and Jewish community activist.

File:JoseMariaAznarWorldJewishCongress2010.jpg
Spain – Former Spanish Prime Minister Jose Maria Aznar addressing
a meeting of the World Jewish Congress in Jerusalem, 1 September 2010


Spain – Former Prime Minister (1996 to 2004) José María Aznar
attends a meeting of the World Jewish Congress in Israel 2010


Spain – José María Aznar at pro-Israeli lobby group AIPAC


Sweden – Prime Minister Göran Persson


Sweden – Prime Minister Göran Persson


Tibet – Buddhist chief Dalai Lama at Wailing Wall

Tibet – Dalai Lama


United Kindom – Foreign Minister David Miliband


United Kingdom – Jewish Foreign Minister David Miliband


UK – Prime Minister David Cameron in Yad Vashem, Israel


United Kingdom – Prime Minister Tony Blair

File:Tony Blair - Jerusalem - June 2011.jpg
International Quartet Envoy and former British Prime Minister Tony Blair
addressing a gathering of the World Jewish Congress in Jerusalem

http://i0.wp.com/www.loonwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/brown_yarmulke.jpg?resize=253%2C400
United Kingdom – Prime Ministers Tony Blair, Gordon Brown


United Kingdom – Prime Minister Gordon Brown in Yad Vashem, Israel


United Nations – Secretary-General Kofi Annan and his wife Nane
(from the Swedish Wallenberg Jewish finance family)


United States
(See Below)


Venezuela – President Hugo Chavez

–=–
The Vatican
–=–


Vatican City
Catholic???


Pope Benedict XVI at the Wailing Wall


Vatican – Pope Benedict XVI Ratzinger


Pope John Paul II at the Wailing Wall


Vatican – Pope John Paul II


Vatican – Pope John Paul II


Pope Benedict XVI Ratzinger

File:1993 Maria Celli-Riegner-Beilin-Vatican-Israel-Relations.jpg
World Jewish Congress leader Gerhart M. Riegner (center) witnesses formal
establishment of diplomatic relations between the Holy See, represented by
Monsignor Claudio Maria Celli (left), and Israel, represented by
Deputy Foreign Minister Yossi Beilin.


Pope John Paul II visits Yad Vashem Holocaust Centre in Israel

https://i2.wp.com/media.israelhayom.co.il/2011/10/02/131754913679963684a_b.jpg
Rabbi Yisrael Meir Lau, chief rabbi of Tel Aviv
A.K.A. “Everybody’s Rabbi”


France – Jewish Cardinal Aaron Jean-Marie Lustiger embracing Rabbi Sirat


Evangelical leader Pat Robertson delivers a speech to a crowd of mostly
evangelical Christians from various nations on a pilgrimage to Israel, 2004.

–=–

–=–

***A Note to Christians***

If ever there was or will be an “anti-Christ” (not to mention one that loves to brag about its responsibility in killing Christ and that He is now boiling in excrement in some place like hell), it is surely right before your eyes – in the form of the international organized Zionist Jew. Isn’t it time to become Christian soldiers and defeat this biblical enemy instead of becoming Friends Of Israel and part of the Christian/Jewish Alliance? How can total and complete enemies be in such an unholy partnership? The Holy Bible is full of violence, which I was fooled into thinking was all a bad thing thanks to Jewish manipulation. Now I realize that it is time for Christians to take the lessons and allegory of the Bible to heart, for violence is a natural biblical response to the purposeful destruction of your species, your values, your families, and your way of life. Will you truly allow the Synagogue of Satan – less than 2% of the U.S. population – to rule you and demoralize and murder your children without a fight?

Jewish comedy at your expense…
They are laughing at you and your “other cheek”.

–=–
The United States
Corruption At all levels
–=–

Video: 300 U.S. Congressmen sign pledge of Allegiance to Israel

Video: Cynthia McKinney refuses to sign a pledge to Israel…
is politically ostracized, redistricted, and loses her office

–=–
The Presidents
–=–


Must Watch Video:
The quad-annual migration of presidential candidates to Israel

–=–

“While only a tiny proportion of the US population is Jewish,
94(%) of Jews live in 13 key electoral college states,
which combined have enough electors to elect the president.”
–World Jewish Congress
(Source–>http://www.worldjewishcongress.org/en/communities/show?id=72)

–=–


President Obama (2009-2017?)


President Obama at the Wailing Wall


President Obama at Yad Vashem, Israel

Bush at the Wailing Wall


President George W. Bush

President Bill Clinton (1993-2001)


Bill and Hillary

–=–

“We Jews have put issue upon issue to the American people.
Then we promote both sides of the issue as confusion reigns.
With their eye’s fixed on the issues, they fail to see who is behind every scene.
We Jews toy with the American public as a cat toys with a mouse…”
“Americans have not had a presidential choice since 1932.
Roosevelt was our man; every president since Roosevelt has been our man.”

– (Harold Wallace Rosenthal)

Roosevelt Labor's ChoiceAn issue of the Yiddish socialist daily, the Forward, endorsed Roosevelt
on the cover of its November 1, 1936, rotogravure section.
In 1936, Roosevelt garnered 85 percent of the Jewish vote.
Note the support of the Jewish run “Labor” unions.

Stop Your Cruel Oppression of the Jews
“In this print, which appeared after a 1905 pogrom in Kishinev, a “Russian Jew” carries on his back a large bundle labeled “Oppression;” hanging from the bundle are weights labeled “Autocracy,” “Robbery,” “Cruelty,” “Assassination,” “Deception,” and “Murder.” In the background, on the right, a Jewish community burns, while in the upper left corner, President Theodore Roosevelt asks the Emperor of Russia, Nicholas II, “Now that you have peace without, why not remove his burden and have peace within your borders?”
(Source–>http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/haventohome/haven-home.html)

Giant Mass Meeting sponsored by the Trade Union Council and New York City Committee of the Jewish People, September 18, 1941
The dual-sided English-Yiddish broadside – rally supporting President Franklin Roosevelt
and his “policy of all aid to Great Britain, the Soviet Union, and China,” in 1941,
sponsored by the Jewish Peoples Committee, a pro-communist organization.
David Dubinsky, president of the International Ladies Garment Union, declined to attend this
September 18, 1941, rally because he viewed the sponsoring group as Communist controlled.
(Source–>http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/haventohome/haven-home.html)

https://i0.wp.com/www.loc.gov/exhibits/haventohome/images/hh0170s.jpg
Hebrew Prayer for Roosevelt and Churchill
This hand-drawn plaque includes dual Hebrew prayers for Winston Churchill and
Franklin Roosevelt.  The one for Roosevelt, based on the traditional Jewish prayer
for the government, reads: “[May He] who gives salvation to President Roosevelt,
[He] whose kingdom is everlasting, protect, and increase, and raise up all of the officials
of America, and [may] the King of Kings lift them up and lengthen their days in office.”


“V for Vendetta” was a Jewish creation with Jewish writers and actors
that promotes the false paradigm of a vendetta for the holocaust,
as most movies do.


Zionist Congress: Join the British Army for Victory.
(Translated) “We will fight them where-ever we meet them, and we will hit them
Hard and Often, until this scourge is driven from the Earth” –Sir Winston Churchill.
Unite with the British to defeat the Nazis. Jewish enlisting is important
in giving the support of the Zionists in the Jewish Agency.

File:V-E-Day Stars and Stripes No 285 Paris 8 May 1945.JPG
This is the real Ashkenazim V for Victory, commonly called VE-Day
(Victory in Europe Day)

–=–

Note that Roosevelt and Churchhill (and all past U.S. Presidents and Prime Ministers)
are royal blood cousins with the Kings and Queens of England;
here genealogically chronicled by the Mormon “Church” :
https://realitybloger.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/3ee75-howlandpedigree.jpg

–=–
Abraham Lincoln-stein
–=–

Isachar Zacharie (1827-1900) to Abraham Lincoln
“English born Isachar Zacharie was President Lincoln’s chiropodist, political confidante, and special emissary. Among other things, Zacharie involved himself in helping Abraham Lincoln secure the Jewish vote. In a letter to Lincoln on November 3, 1864, Zacharie wrote: “I just returned to this city after a trip of nine days through Pennsylvania and New York state, and I am happy to inform you, that I am satisfied that I have done much good, I now think all is Right . . . . As regards the Isrelites [sic]–with but few Exceptions, they will vote for you. . . . I understand them well, and have taken the precaution–to see that they do as they have promised–I have secured good and trustworthy men to–attend on them on Election Day–My Men have been all the week seeing that their masses are properly Registered–so that all will go right on the 8th ins.”

(Source–>http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/haventohome/haven-home.html)

–=–

“Lincoln was the first President to make it possible for rabbis to serve as military chaplains by signing the 1862 Act of Congress which changed the law that had barred all but Christian clergymen from the role. It all started on September 8, 1861, when a 30-year-old Philadelphia cantor, Michael Mitchell Allen, returned to his encampment with the 65th Regiment of the Fifth Pennsylvania Cavalry, known as Cameron’s Dragoons. The regiment of 1,200 men, mostly Jews, elected him their chaplain. Complaints flew up the military ladder. Lincoln, then signed the Act, and Jewish chaplains have been serving in the American Armed Forces ever since.

He was also the first, and happily, the only President who was called upon to revoke an official act of anti-Semitism by the U.S. government. He canceled General Ulysses S Grant’s “Order No. 11” expelling all Jews from Tennessee from the district controlled by his armies during the Civil War. (Grant denied personal responsibility for this act attributing it to his subordinate.)

Shortly after delivering the Emancipation Proclamation, Lincoln met Canadian Christian Zionist, Henry Wentworth Monk, who expressed hope that Jews who were being oppressed in Russia and Turkey be emancipated “by restoring them to their national home in Palestine.” Lincoln replied this was “a noble dream and one shared by many Americans.”…

In his study of American Jewry and the Civil War (Philadelphia, 1951), Bertram W. Korn writes that in the eulogy Rabbi Isaac M. Wise delivered after Lincoln’s assassination, he said: “The lamented Abraham Lincoln believed himself to be bone from our bone and flesh from our flesh. He supposed himself to be a descendant of Hebrew parentage. He said so in my presence.”

Ever since, speculation has been rife. Google “Abraham Lincoln Jewish” and a plethora of articles appear…

The “Case for Jewish Lincoln”:

1. His close friendships with prominent Jews, along with his pro-Jewish policies.

2. While Lincoln never professed belonging to a specific faith, he would often refer to his beliefs citing the 20th chapter of the Book of Exodus – the Ten Commandments.

3. His name was Abraham. His great-grandfather was named Mordechai.

4. His ancestors came from the town of Lincoln in eastern England, established in 1159, it has an interesting Jewish history. During Crusader riots, the Sheriff of Lincoln and the Bishop of London saved the Jews by giving them official protection and taught love of Jews to parishioners. It’s been postulated that when the Jews were ordered out of England, Abraham Lincoln’s ancestors may have been Conversos.

5. When Lincoln was assassinated, Jewish communities sat Shiva. Rabbis around the country eulogized the fallen President.

6. Lincoln was described as having Sephardic features.”

(Source–>http://www.aish.com/j/f/Abraham_Lincoln_and_the_Jews.html)

–=–

“The Melungeon DNA Surname Project by Dr. Elizabeth Hirschman and Dr. Donald Panther Yates state that Abraham Lincoln was of Jewish ancestry. Dr. Hirschman writes “The DNA sample we have came from a Berry male from Tennessee whose ancestors had arrived in Virginia. The marriage of Abraham Lincoln’s parents was performed in the home of a Berry (and not a church) suggesting that not only the Lincolns, but also the Berry’s were of Jewish descent. We believe that many of the very earliest settlers who came to North America from England were actually Sephardic Jews.”

(Source–>http://www.melungeons.com/articles/mar2005.htm)

–=–

This presents an interesting dilemma, as again we must acknowledge the bloodline lineage of all presidents as cousins of George Washington. Abraham Lincoln is listed, among others, as:

7th cousin, 7 times removed from Barack Obama
7th cousin, 5 times removed from George W. Bush
7th cousin 4 times removed from Gerald Ford
11th cousin, 3 times removed from Mitt Romney
13th cousin 3 times removed from George Washington
14th cousin 2 times removed from Robert E. Lee
14th cousin 5 times removed from Thomas Jefferson
15th cousin 4 times removed from William Henry Harrison via Edward I King of England
17th cousin 2 times removed from John Quincy Adams via Edward I King of England
17th cousin 2 times removed from Benjamin Harrison via Edward I King of England
18th cousin 1 time removed from Theodore Roosevelt via Edward I King of England
19th cousin from Franklin Roosevelt via Edward I King of England
20th cousin from John Forbes Kerry
31st great-grandson of Alfred The Great (King of the Anglo-Saxons)
34th great-grandson of Emperor Charlemagne

“According to Burke’s Presidential Families of the United States, Abraham Lincoln is a direct descendant of King Edward I Plantagenet (1239-1307) of England… The genealogical chart shown below traces Lincoln’s line from Edward I (top left) down through Lincoln’s mother, Nancy [Hanks] Lincoln (1784-1818), a family that had its American beginnings in the Philadelphia area but later migrated to Virginia and Kentucky… the aforementioned book… describes other interesting royal connections to American presidents – namely, George Washington as descended from King Henry III (1207-1272); George Washington from King Edward I (1239-1307); Thomas Jefferson from David I, King of Scott (1080-1153); James Monroe from Edward III (1312-1377); John Quincy Adams from Edward I (1239-1307); Ulysses Grant from David I, King of Scots (1080-1153); and, although he was not a president, the genealogical connection of Robert E. Lee to Queen Elizabeth II.  There is also a connection with a more recent president, Richard M. Nixon, and King Edward III, although in that case, the claim goes through an “illegitimate” (but “biological”) offspring, Eleanor Holland, who was born around 1405… Abraham Lincoln can not only be connected as a cousin to the aforementioned presidents and Robert E. Lee, but also to Queen Victoria…”

Remember the chart above listing the Kingdom of Jerusalem as a Plantagenet family claim?

–=–

Abraham LincolnTom Hanks
Lincoln was born on February 12, 1809 to Thomas Lincoln and Nancy Hanks.
Tom Hanks is of the bloodline as most prominent actors are,
being 3rd cousin, 4 times removed of Abe Lincoln.

–=–

According to Ancestry.com, George Clooney is the half-first cousin five times removed from Lincoln, the 16th president. The genealogy website breaks down the connection, explaining the “half” means that two of their ancestors were half-siblings –  Lincoln’s mother Nancy Hanks was the half-sister of Clooney’s 4th great-grandmother Mary Ann Sparrow.

And Hollywood continues to promote a Jewish historical perspective without ever revealing this inconvenient genealogical relationship of its actors turned directors and writers. Steven Spielberg’s new movie Lincoln, for example, should be watched or re-watched with these facts in mind…

So at what point do we distinguish the royal blood from the Ashkenazim “Jewish” blood? Can it be distinguished, if most actors, presidents, congressmen, Supreme Court justices, and corporate CEO’s and founders are labeled as both cousins of royal blood and as “Jewish”? Is it not clear this the distinction is not racial or religious, but must be considered as blood-based? A shared psychopathic blood without the imposition of empathy – one blood to rule them all…

Sources:

http://www.familyforest.com/Kerry_Bush_Cousins.html
http://usspost.com/abraham-lincoln-seventh-cousin-five-times-removed-george-w-bush-69662/
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2207331/How-Tom-Hanks-related-Abraham-Lincoln-presidents-mother.html
http://famouskin.com/_abraham_lincoln_famous_kin.php
http://civilwar.gratzpa.org/2012/12/best-of-2012-the-royal-ancestry-of-president-abraham-lincoln/

–=–

https://i2.wp.com/www.loc.gov/exhibits/haventohome/images/hh0196s.jpg
President Grant Makes a Contribution to Congregation Adas Israel

Adas Israel was the first synagogue building built in the District of Columbia and is closely linked with the beginnings of Jewish life in Washington. President Ulysses S. Grant and other federal and civic officials attended the dedication ceremony on June 9, 1876. Shown here is an official receipt from the Adas Israel “Hebrew” Congregation to the president acknowledging his ten-dollar contribution. In 1969, to make way for Washington’s subway, the first Adas Israel building (which had not functioned as a synagogue since 1907), was moved from its original location at 6th and G Street, N.W., to 3rd and G Street, N.W., where it currently houses the Lillian and Albert Small Jewish Museum and the Jewish Historical Society of Greater Washington.

–=–
The Vice Presidents
–=–


Vice President Joe Biden

“You make up 11 percent of the seats in the United States Congress. You make up one-third of all Nobel laureates… The embrace of immigration” is part of that, as is the involvement of Jews in social justice movements… You can’t talk about the civil rights movement in this country without talking about Jewish freedom riders and Jack Greenberg,” he said, telling a story about seeing a group of Jewish activists at a segregated movie theater in Delaware. “You can’t talk about the women’s movement without talking about Betty Friedan” or American advances in science and technology without mentioning Einstein and Carl Sagan, or music and Gershwin, Bob Dylan and “so, so, so many other people…Think behind of all that, I bet you 85 percent of those changes, whether it’s in Hollywood or social media are a consequence of Jewish leaders in the industry. The influence is immense, the influence is immense. And, I might add, it is all to the good… Jews have also been key to the evolution of American jurisprudence, he continued, namedropping Brandeis, Fortas, Frankfurter, Cardozo, Ginsberg, Breyer, Kagan. You literally can’t. You can’t talk about the recognition of… rights in the Constitution without looking at these incredible jurists that we’ve had.”

–Vice President Joe Biden’s speech for Jewish Heritage Month,
which concerned some Jews as too historically honest


Vice President Joe Biden


Joe Biden with Israeli presidents Netanyahu and Peres


Former Vice President Dick Cheney with Lubavitchers.

–=–
The Executive Cabinet
–=–

Former White House Chief of Staff Rahm (Israel) Emanuel
Now Mayor of Chicago… Always a duel-Israeli/U.S. citizen


Hillary Clinton – First Lady, Senator, and Cheif of Staff


U.S. Chief of Staff Joshua Bolten,


Former U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Stuart Eizenstat

–=–
The Governors
–=–

Governor Jeb Bush (Florida)
meets with Zionist Lubavitch Movement

Governor Mit Romney (Massachusetts)
And at the Wailing wall below

Governor George Pataki (New York), Lubavitcher “Award” ceremony.
by picture of the ultra-racist “Rebbe” [i.e. “Teacher”] in the background).
Also speaking: Hillary Clinton
Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger (California)

Governor Rod Blagojevich flanked by Members of the
Jewish Supremacist Lubavitch Movement

Governor Mike Huckabee with Israeli P.M. Netanyahu
–=–
The Mayors
–=–

“By July, The Three Biggest U.S. Cities Will Have Jewish Mayors”

–Tablet Magazine, May 22, 2013


New Los Angeles Jewish Mayor Eric Garcetti debating on the
Jewish media against a ‘goy’. Hardly seems fair…


Los Angeles Mayor-elect Eric Garcetti attended Beth Chayim Chadashim’s (BCC)
annual awards brunch on June 2 and presented the 2013 Rabbi Erwin and
Agnes Herman Humanitarian Award to BCC honoree David Codell.


Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg (New York)


Former Mayor Giuliani celebrating the Rebbe’ Schneerson


Mayor of New York, Ed Koch meeting with racist Rebbe

Bob Filner on Election Night.
Bob Filner, Jewish Mayor of San Diego


Raum Emanuel, Mayor of Chicago
Former Obama Chief of Staff
Duel citizen of Israel

–=–
The Congress
–=–

 “If Democrats take the House, we’re going to see a huge influx” of Jewish lawmakers,
said Ira Forman, the executive director of the National Jewish Democratic Council.
‘But even on a disappointing night, I think we’ll see a few more Jewish Democrats in the House.’
(Source: http://forward.com/articles/4693/a-tribe-of-candidates-leads-drive-to-retake-house/)

https://i2.wp.com/www.loc.gov/exhibits/haventohome/images/hh0167b_p1s.jpg
“Displayed here are a variety of buttons, stickers, and other election related memorabilia
offering a snapshot of Jewish participation in the political process as members of Congress.”


Senator McCain at the Wailing Wall


Senator Joseph Lieberman with award from “Friends of Lubavitch”


House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer (Left) and
House Speaker John Boehner (Right) with chabads.


Newt Gingrich


Congressman Newt Gingrich, Speaker of the U.S. House

–=–
The Middle Management
–=–

I could go on and on and on but…

–=–
Oh Wait!
We forgot Iran…

–=–

Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (R) speaks as Rabbi Moshe Ber Beck of
Neturei Karta, a fringe Ultra-Orthodox movement within the anti-Zionist bloc,
listens during a meeting in New York, September 24, 2008.
REUTERS/Brendan McDermid (UNITED STATES)


Anti-Zionist Orthodox Jewish Rabbis meet with Irans President Ahmadinejad, 2006

https://i2.wp.com/www.vosizneias.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/ahm6-725x520.jpg

A rabbi from the fringe group Jews United Against Zionism embraces Iranian President and Holocaust denier Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
Rabbi Yisroel Dovid Weiss, anti-Zionist leader of Netrurei Karta

“Why on earth would a rabbi from New York travel to Tehran to embrace
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, a man who says
the Holocaust never happened and that Israel should be annihilated?”
–Fox News article, 2006

The answer?

Rabbi Yisroel Dovid Weiss led the Neturei Karta (New York) delegation
to Iran’s capital on Dec. 11 to participate in a two-day
conference on whether the Holocaust occurred.

–=–

“Zionism is a fundamentally heretical movement which
denies the Divine imperative
that Jews remain in exile until the day
when all mankind will be miraculously redeemed…”

–Weiss told a gathering of protesters in New York City in November, 2006.


Ahmadinejad attends the International Conference on
Global Alliance against Terrorism for a Just Peace in Iran
May 14th, 2011

–=–

Anti-Zionist?

Ahhh… no wonder Iran is on the international Jew and Israel’s shit list!

For Zionism is the blind support of the illegal State of Israel…

–=–

Iranian vice president Mohammad Reza Rahimi publicly stated that
the Talmud teaches how to destroy non-Jews and that
80% of America’s wealth is in the hands of 6% of the world’s Jewish population.

–=–

President of Iran Ahmadinejad meets Jewish Rabbis in NYC, September 2012.

–=–

“There is today a lot of oppression, which a large portion of this is due
to the Zionist. The occupying of Palestine is just a part of this injustice.
But the bigger wrong  is that they are calling themselves Jews and
they justify their horrendous actions  in the name of Judaism”.

–Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
, to anti-Zionist Rabbi Beck
In New York City, September 27, 2012

–=–

“We  are impressed with Your Excellency’s concern and care for the
Jewish community,  a fact that we personally have experienced during our visits in Iran.
We have  visited the Jewish old-age home, the Jewish hospital and we have seen
the Matzo bakery which is a necessity for Jewish people. Also it is well-known that the
Jewish community is represented by its own member of parliament, despite the fact that
the Jewish community does not have the number of constituents
required to have a parliament representative.”

–Senior Rabbi Moshe Dov Beck to Ahmadinejad,
–In New York City, September 27, 2012

–=–

Amongst the issues discussed, the Rabbi stated: “There are many many Jews  worldwide including in occupied Palestine, who are against the whole concept of Zionism and totally in opposition to the State of Israel”. The  rabbi praised the President for his understanding the difference between  Judaism and Zionism. “We  would like to laud Your Excellency for understanding to differentiate between Judaism and Zionism, between good and evil.”

–Senior Rabbi Moshe Dov Beck to Ahmadinejad,
–New York, September 27, 2012

–=–
So Who’s Jew?
–=–

“These Eastern European Jews have neither a racial nor a historic connection
with Palestine. Their ancestors were not inhabitants of the Promised Land.
They are the direct descendants of the people of the Khazar Kingdom.
The Khazars were a non-Semitic, Turko-Mongolian tribe.”

–Mr. Benjamin Freedman, a Jewish industrialist born in New York,

from Economic Council Letter published October 15, 1947

–=–

“Mr. Freedman was challenged, unwisely, by a Zionist objector;
he invited his challenger to go with him to the Jewish room
of the New York Public Library. There they could together examine the
Jewish Encyclopedia volume I pp. 1-12, and the published works of
Graetz, Dubnow, Friedlander, Raisin and many other noted Jewish historians,
which, as well as other non-Jewish authorities,
“establish the fact beyond all possible doubt”.’

–Somewhere South of Suez (1950) Pg 349-350

–=–

“Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a ‘Jew’
or to call a contemporary Jew an Israelite or a Hebrew.”

— “A brief History of the Terms for Jew”, 1980 Jewish Almanac, page 3

–=–

“Khazar, an ancient Turkic speaking people who ruled a large and powerful
state in the steppes North of the Caucasus Mountains from the 7th century
to their demise in the mid 11th century A.D… In the 8th Century it’s
political and religious head… as well as the greater part of the Khazar nobility,
abandoned paganism and converted to Judaism… .”

Encyclopedia Americana (1985)

–=–

“Khazars, confederation of Turkic and Iranian tribes that established a
major commercial empire in the second half of the 6th century,
covering the southeastern section of modern European Russia… |
In the middle of the 8th century the ruling classes adopted Judaism as their religion.”

–Encyclopedia Britannica (15th edition)

–=–

 “Khazars, a non-Semitic, Asiatic, Mongolian tribal nation who emigrated into
Eastern Europe about the first century, who were converted as an entire nation to
Judaism in the seventh century by the expanding Russian nation
which absorbed the entire Khazar population, and who account for the
presence in Eastern Europe of the great numbers of Yiddish-speaking
Jews in Russia, Poland, Lithuania, Galatia, Besserabia and Rumania.”

–The Jewish Encyclopedia

–=–

 “Khazars, a national group of general Turkic type, independent and sovereign in
Eastern Europe between the seventh and tenth centuries C.E.
During part of this time the leading Khazars professed Judaism…
In spite of the negligible information of an archaeological nature,
the presence of Jewish groups and the impact of Jewish ideas in Eastern Europe
are considerable during the Middle Ages. Groups have been mentioned as migrating
to Central Europe from the East often have been referred to as Khazars,
thus making it impossible to overlook the possibility that they originated
from within the former Khazar Empire.”

–The Encyclopedia Judaica (1972)

–=–

“Ashkenazim, the Ashkenazim are one of the two major
divisions of the Jews, the other being the Shephardim.”

–Academic American Encyclopedia (1985)

–=–

“Ashkenazim, the Ashkenazim are the Jews whose ancestors lived in
German lands… it was among Ashkenazi Jews that the idea of political Zionism
emerged, leading ultimately to the establishment of the state of Israel…
In the late 1960s, Ashkenazi Jews numbered some 11 million,
about 84 percent of the world Jewish population.”

–Encyclopedia Americana (1985)

–=–

 “The primary meaning of Ashkenaz and Ashkenazim in Hebrew is
Germany and Germans. This may be due to the fact that the home of
the ancient ancestors of the Germans is Media, which is the Biblical Ashkenaz…
Krauss is of the opinion that in the early medieval ages
the Khazars were sometimes referred to as Ashkenazim…
About 92 percent of all Jews or approximately 14,500,000 are Ashkenazim.”

–The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia

–=–

Khazars {kah’z-ars} The Khazars, a Turkic people, created a commercial and
political empire that dominated substantial parts of South Russia during much of
the 7th through 10th centuries. During the 8th century the Khazar aristocracy and the
kagan (king) were converted to Judaism. The Khazars established their capital at
Itil (or Atil), in the Volga delta, and for four centuries thereafter this Jewish empire held
the balance of power between the Christian Byzantine Empire and the Muslim Caliphate.
The fortified Khazar city of Sarkil on the lower Don River was built with Byzantine help
and served as a crossroads to central Asia. The Khazars controlled many of the trade
routes to the Orient; some of the Radhanites (Jewish merchants from Gaul), for example,
were accustomed to crossing the Khazar empire while traveling to and from China and
India. During the late 10th and early 11th centuries an alliance of Byzantines and
Russians broke the power of the Khazars in the Crimea. In 965, Svyatoslav I,
duke  of Kiev, decisively defeated the Khazar army. Further to the east new
waves of Turkic invadersoverran the remains of the Khazar state.

–New Grolier Encyclopedia

–=–

“It is highly probable that the bulk of the Jew’s ancestors ‘never’ lived in
Palestine ‘at all,’ which witnesses the power of historical assertion over fact.”

–‘The Outline of History’ by H. G. Wells:

–=–

“Now these are the generations of the sons of Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth: and unto
them were sons born after the flood. The sons of Japheth;…the sons of Gomer; Ashkenaz…”

–The Bible (Genesis 10:1-3)

–=–

“Without a complete and accurate knowledge of the origin and history of the
‘Jews’ in Eastern Europe… it is quite impossible for [Christians] to intelligently
understand the harmful influence the Jews have exerted for ten centuries…’
My many years of intensive research established beyond the question of any doubt,
contrary to the generally accepted belief held by Christians, that the ‘Jews’ in
Eastern Europe at any time in their history in Eastern Europe were never the
legendary ‘lost ten tribes’ of Bible lore. That historic fact is incontrovertible.
Relentless research established as equally true that the ‘Jews’ in Eastern Europe
at no time in their history could be correctly regarded as the direct lineal descendants
of the legendary ‘lost ten tribes’ of Bible lore. The ‘Jews’ in Eastern Europe in modern
history cannot legitimately point to a single ancient ancestor who ever
set even a foot on the soil of Palestine in the era of Bible history…
Research also revealed that the ‘Jews’ in Eastern Europe were never ‘Semites,’
are not ‘Semites’ now, nor can they ever be regarded as ‘Semites’ at any future time
by any stretch of the imagination. Exhaustive research also irrevocably rejects as a
fantastic fabrication the generally accepted belief by Christians that the ‘Jews’ in
Eastern Europe are the legendary ‘Chosen People’ so very vocally publicized
by the Christian clergy from their pulpits…”

–‘Facts Are Facts’, by Benjamin Freedman

–=–

“In the year 740 A.D. the Khazars were officially converted to Judaism.
A century later they were crushed by the incoming Slavic-speaking people and
were scattered over central Europe where they were known as Jews.”

–The American Peoples Encyclopedia, 1954

–=–

“Chazars [Khazars]: A people of Turkish origin whose life and history are interwoven
with the very beginnings of the history of the Jews of Russia. The kingdom of the
Chazars was firmly established in most of South Russia long before the foundation
of the Russian monarchy by the Varangians (855)…
Jews have lived on the shores of the Black and Caspian seas since the first centuries
of the common era [after the death of Christ]. Historical evidence points to the region
of the Ural as the home of the Chazars. Among the classical writers of the Middle Ages
they were known as the ‘Chozars,’ ‘Khazirs,’ ‘Akatzirs,’ and ‘Akatirs,’ and in the
Russian chronicles as ‘Khwalisses’ and ‘Ugry Byelyye.’…”

Jewish Encyclopedia, 3rd Edition, 1925

–=–

“Khazars, a national group of general Turkic type, independent and sovereign in
Eastern Europe between the seventh and tenth centuries A.D.
During part of this time the leading Khazars professed Judaism.”

–The Encyclopedia Judaica, Vol. 10, (1971)

–=–

“Khazars, a medieval people, probably related to the VolgaBulgars, whose
ruling class adopted Judaism during the 8th cent. The Khazars seem to have
emerged during the 6th cent., from the vast nomadic Hun (Turki) empire which
stretched from the steppes of Eastern Europe and the Volga basin to the Chinese frontier.
Although it is often claimed that allusions to the Khazars are found as early as 200 C.E.,
actually they are not mentioned until 627… Most Jewish Historians date the
conversion of the Khazar King to Judaism during the first half of this century {A.D.}…”

–The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia

–=–

“This, of course, is inspired by the story of the Covenant in Genesis; and it implies
that the Khazars too claimed the status of a Chosen Race, who made their own Covenant
with the Lord, even though they [Khazars] were not descended from Abraham’s seed…
He cannot, and does not, claim for them [the Khazars] Semitic descent, he traces their
[Khazars] ancestry not to Shem, but to Noah’s third son, Japheth or more precisely
to Japheth’s grandson, Togarma, the ancestor of all Turkish tribes…
We have found in the family registers of our fathers,’ Joseph asserts boldly,
‘that Togarma had ten sons, and the names of their offspring are as follows:
Uigur, Dursu, Avars, Huns, Basilii, Tarniakh, Khazars, Zagora, Bulgars, Sabir.
We [Khazars] are the sons of Khazar, the seventh…'”

–The Thirteenth Tribe, (Jewish author) Arthur Koestler, pages 58-82

–=–

(Source for some of the above quotes–>http://www.iamthewitness.com/doc/Ashkenazis.are.not.the.descendants.of.the.Ancient.Israelites.htm)

–=–

Just in Europe and Russia alone, the (Khazarian) Zionist Jews have been banished over 47 times in the last 1000 years (not including this last century):

Mainz, 1012 – France, 1182 – Upper Bavaria, 1276 – England, 1290 – France, 1306 – France, 1322 – Saxony, 1349 – Hungary, 1360 – Belgium, 1370 – Slovakia, 1380 – France, 1394 – Austria, 1420 – Lyons, 1420 – Cologne, 1424 – Mainz, 1438 – Augsburg, 1438 – Upper Bavaria, 1442 – Netherlands, 1444 – Brandenburg, 1446 – Mainz, 1462 – Mainz, 1483 – Warsaw, 1483 – Spain, 1492 – Italy, 1492 – Lithuania, 1495 – Portugal, 1496 – Naples, 1496 – Navarre, 1498 – Nuremberg, 1498 – Brandenburg, 1510 – Prussia, 1510 – Genoa, 1515 – Naples, 1533 – Italy, 1540 – Naples, 1541 – Prague, 1541 – Genoa, 1550 – Bavaria, 1551 – Prague, 1557 – Papal States, 1569 – Hungary, 1582 – Hamburg, 1649 – Vienna, 1669 – Slovakia, 1744 –  Moravia, 1744 – Bohemia, 1744 – Moscow, 1891.

—Excerpted from “The Synagogue of Satan” by Andrew Carrington Hitchcock. This was not the end, as we all know from recent history.

–=–

“It can hardly be an accident that antagonism directed against the Jews is to be found pretty much everywhere in the world where Jews and non-Jews are associated. And as the Jews are the common element of the situation it would seem probable, on the face of it, that the cause will be found in them rather than in the widely varying groups which feel this antagonism.”

Professor Jesse H. Holmes, writing in “The American Hebrew”.

–=–

“If this hostility, even aversion, had only been shown towards the Jews at one period and in one country, it would be easy to unravel the limited causes of this anger, but this race has been on the contrary an object of hatred to all the peoples among whom it has established itself. It must be therefore, since the enemies of the Jews belonged to the most diverse races, since they lived in countries very distant from each other; since they were ruled by very different laws, governed by opposite principles, since they had neither the same morals, nor the same customs, since they were animated by unlike dispositions which did not permit them to judge of anything in the same way, it must be therefore that the general cause of anti-Semitism has always resided in Israel itself and not in those who have fought against Israel.”

—Bernard Lazare, noted Jewish author, from his book “L’antisemitisme son histoire et ses causes”, published in 1894, regarding the history of the expulsions of Jews from so many cultures.

–=–
Zionism and Patriotism
–=–

https://i2.wp.com/www.loc.gov/exhibits/haventohome/images/hh0243s.jpg

“A successful lawyer, Louis D. Brandeis (1856-1941) became active in the nascent American Zionist movement on the eve of World War I. In 1914, he became chair of the Provisional Executive Committee for General Zionist Affairs, the leader of American Zionism. His participation served to legitimize the movement in the eyes of American Jewry and other Americans. He believed strongly that Zionism and American patriotism were compatible, a view expressed in the pamphlet displayed here. In 1916, Louis Brandeis became the Supreme Court’s first Jewish justice.

Today, statism, nationalism, and patriotism are socialist/fascist tools used to blindly trick the people into romanticizing about a country called America that somehow still exists with eminent constitutional intent – one that will somehow be taken back through non-violent begging. In my future essay, we will learn that America was never the people’s country in the first place, and that there is nothing to take back!

–=–

“Beware the leader who bangs the drums of war in order to whip the citizenry into a patriotic fervor, for patriotism is indeed a double-edged sword. It both emboldens the blood, just as it narrows the mind. And when the drums of war have reached a fever pitch and the blood boils with hate and the mind has closed, the leader will have no need in seizing the rights of the citizenry. Rather, the citizenry, infused with fear and blinded by patriotism, will offer up all of their rights unto the leader and gladly so. How do I know? For this is what I have done. And I am Caesar.”

–Julius Caesar

–=–

These poor demonized outcasts try to warn the people of the world,
even as the world governments all defend Israel to the death…

http://www.nkusa.org/activities/demonstrations/israeliflag.cfm
Anti-Zionism is anti-Israel… here Jews burn the Israeli flag

https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-gJAYVVB0pKs/UGbUElB_NcI/AAAAAAAAK2Y/LWp_Bjjrlhk/s800/250px-Members_of_Neturei_Karta_Orthodox_Jewish_group_protest_against_Israel.jpg

–=–
For those who have eyes to see, let them see,
and for those who have ears to hear, let them hear.
–=–

We stand on the threshold of a cultural genocide that targets all members of the human race. As the Talmud and Protocols teach, this effort must be done covertly and most importantly incrementally so as to be mostly unseen by the goy (non-Jew).

With this understanding and comprehension, it should be obvious that peace can be accomplished in the world only through the expulsion of this minority from the governments and seats of authority of the world. Authority is nothing more than permission of the people. And with the understanding that law requires force, the nations of the world had best force the international Jew out of their governments before their strength in numbers are lulled into insignificance.

This effort must be universal, for the powers of all nations rest in their hands. The price for resistance is historically evident in the outcome of World War 1 and 2. The power of this Masonic League of Nations now called the United Nations are united to further the Zionist cause, against the informed consent and interests of the people of each individual nation. The peacekeeping forces of the United Jewish Nations are the armies of all usurped nations under Jewish rule and influence. And so individually and with individual sovereignty, the people of those nations must rise together for the common cause of expelling this enemy of all people.

A lofty goal indeed for a world masterfully entertained and brainwashed by the very entity that enslaves them and tells them they are liberated and have freedom…

Of course the legal definition of freedom is “to obey the law”!!!

This blind patriotism and nationalism creates masses of mindless adherants to an obviously lawless set of international Jewish lawmakers.

–=–

Stay tuned, freinds, for this is only scratching the surface. My three-part research project on the true Masonic roots of the United States and its constitution is coming close to being finished. What you have just read has everything to do with that history, with the foundations of Freemasonry, with the establishment and support of Zionism and Israel (Kingdom of Jerusalem), and the fruition of the planned World War III as penned by the Masons themselves at the rebuilding of the sacred Temple of Solomon upon and over the holy Muslim site on the Mount to incite war.

I will post the link to that project here when completed, entitled Cracking The Cult Of The Constitution

.

–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com
–Thursday, June 20th, 2013

Molested: My Unlawful Encounter With TSA


3253293070_MolestedByTSA_xlarge.

As I entered the line for the security and “screening” area of the Salt Lake City Airport on April 27th, 2013, I decided that it was time to stand up for my natural rights as a lawful man. I decided not to offer my willing consent that any TSA officer might presume as to my willingness or legal duty to be either irradiated in a full-body scanner or be patted down by any agent of government or its security guards (police) without first being shown probable cause or reasonable suspicion that I have committed a regulated commercial or criminal act, and to show any law that gave that officer or security guard authority to do so despite my lack of voluntary consent.

I arrived at the Salt Lake City airport almost two hours early, surprised to find the “security checkpoint” line almost empty of citizens eagerly waiting for their chance to be scanned and touched inappropriately by these TSA “agents” – employees of a government corporation. Whereas in my previous flying experiences I would refuse the full-body scanner but give my unwilling but seemingly necessary consent to a full body pat down just so that I could catch my flight on time, on this day I felt that it was time to make a stand for my own rights and that of others traveling this supposedly free land with the right to the uninhibited freedom of “travel.” Ironically, the very people in that line that I was trying to help see the truth of our collective tyrannical disposition turned out to be among my staunchest detractors! And I wondered what it must have felt like to be Rosa Parks on the back of that bus, refusing to give up her seat and sitting for her own rights and for that of all people, not just her own color. How difficult must it have been for her to listen to the jeering and insults around her?

I was soon to find out…

As I approached the first TSA agent after stepping through the line of ropes, a pleasant gentleman in a Transportation Security Agency (TSA) uniform was sitting at a podium and checking “driver’s licenses” as identification to match names on tickets. I felt comfortable and assured that the presentment of a license to drive a vehicle in commerce had nothing to do with consenting to the TSA and its disgusting objectives or illegal searches, and so I did not object to this pointless act as I felt it was not unreasonable to identify myself. After all, I wasn’t driving a commercial vehicle or utilizing any part of the “Motor Vehicle Code” in this traveling adventure in the sky, so what harm could it cause to show this unrelated “license” to commercially “drive” even though I was not doing so?

Without harm or delay, I was handed back my “Driver’s License” and boarding pass with verification of TSA identification for screening purposes, and pointed to the next section.

As I waited in the quite short line of people, I felt confident in my self and that I possess the natural right not to be detained, irradiated, or felt up regardless of what some central government corporation creates within its rules, codes, and regulations. For a natural right is just that – the right to not have unlawful acts committed against you, which creates a natural duty in other men and women to honor that right as they would wish it to be honored back at them. Government/political rights are of course the exact opposite of natural rights, in that your political rights include having such abuses, extortion, punishments, pains, taxes, imprisonment, and in this case irradiation or molestation forced upon you. This is the price of a ticket to be a “citizen” acting in “commerce“.

I always refer people to TITLE 42, SECTION 1981 for a deep understanding of what a government granted political “right” actually is, for which most people have no clue. It states:

“Statement of equal rights”

“All persons within the jurisdiction of the United States shall have the same right in every State and Territory to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, give evidence, and to the full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings for the security of persons and property as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, penalties, taxes, licenses, and exactions of every kind, and to no other.”

This of course describes perfectly a “political right” – your right is to be harmed, punished, pained, taxed, and extorted from (exaction). These are the “equal rights” of all citizens! But I do not accept this as a true statement, and will always rebut the assumption that I consent to having political rights forced upon me which violate my natural rights. Put simply, natural rights are free, political rights are enslavement, and equal rights are political not natural.

Today at SLC International Airport in front of the TSA and Airport Police, I stood up for my natural rights – which cannot lawfully be superseded by any government-granted political rights without my consent.

Since I had no objection to the age-old practice of scanning the baggage of airline passengers, what is in my opinion a reasonable security precaution for the safety of the people (or at least for their perception of safety), I went ahead and placed my stuff on the conveyer belt to be checked. This was the last time my baggage was “allowed” to be in my position until this whole ordeal was over, though no law was ever presented or enumerated to allow such confiscation and detainment of my baggage despite my many demands to have that law presented.

The same metal detector that was used for decades now stood in front of me. Behind that apparatus and to the right was the “full-body scanner” that I was certainly opposed to and for which I felt was unreasonable and dangerous to my personal health and those around it. And so I proceeded towards the open (not roped off) and working (electronically charged and ready) metal detector (another thing I am not opposed to if reasonable and consensual). Before I could step through that typical metal detector I was so used to for so many decades of flying, I was told by a second TSA agent that I should walk into the full-body scanner instead. I calmly stated no thank you, I did not consent to that request and that I would gladly be “screened” by walking through the traditional metal detector. At this point, a third female in TSA uniform and badge told me to go ahead and walk to the scanner. Again I stated no, that I do not wish or consent to that action. Her response was to tell me (not ask) that oh, I was wanting to “opt out” of this action. I stated clearly that no, this was a legal term that I do not accept as a legal offer, and that I instead refuse to give my consent to being scanned by that machine but will gladly consent to walking through the metal detector for screening purposes.

With a confused look, she made a waving motion that I thought meant to walk through the metal detector. I proceeded to do so, but a forth male TSA agent was now blocking my path on the other side of that machine. I hesitated for a moment, allowing the agent to move out of my way, but instead he directed me to wait and hold where I was for a moment. He then yelled out that a “male pat-down” was required for yet another male TSA officer.

Next, the TSA agent blocking my way told me I must go through a full body pat-down in order to bypass the full-body scanner. I stated clearly that no, I do not consent to being patted down by anyone in any capacity – officially or otherwise – and that I was not acting in commerce but would be glad to go through the metal detector and be on my way. As I began to walk into the metal detector, this new agents’ hand went up and pressed against my chest, and he told me to stop where I was. Acting lawfully, I stopped and asked why I was being stopped. The answer was the same – that I must be screened properly – which meant that I must be patted down inappropriately.

Upon this order, I again stated that I did not consent to or accept this offer by the TSA. And I followed up on his demand by asking the lawful question, “Am I being detained”?

The answer from the male TSA agent was: “No, we are not detaining you sir”.

I looked at the female TSA agent to my right side, and she verified that I was not being detained.

I then asked the question: “Am I free to go?”

The male and female TSA agents both stated after a short pause that “Yes, I was free to go“.

I then proceeded to step through the traditional metal detector and passed through it without any detection of hidden objects, with no alarms sounding.

But for reasons unknown to me, the male TSA agent again tried to block me from walking through to get my luggage at the end of the conveyer belt located after the metal detector as was generally the normal screening procedure. His hand went up and touched my shoulder this time, and he instructed me that I must wait there for the proper agent to pat me down.

Confused, I asked again: “So wait. Am I being detained? Are you detaining me?”

The answer again came from the TSA agent: “No sir, I cannot detain you”.

And again I asked: “Then am I free to go to my plane?”

“Yes sir”, the male agent answered with uncertainty and nervousness, though his words inspired no confidence and did not match his body language or his actions. He stood back as I passed through the metal detector just enough for me to pass through, but still hindered my way slightly causing our right shoulders and arms to touch. He was short in stature, attempting to be authoritative but failing without cause.

Slow and methodical, I again attempted to proceed to where my bags were sitting post-screening (after already being duly x-rayed) and put my hand upon the handle of my largest piece of luggage. At this point the second agent stopped me, telling me loudly and with concern not to touch my bags and property because I had not been “properly screened”.

I stated that I just went through the metal detector and no alarm went off. You have scanned my bags and have no legal issues or reason to believe I am dangerous, so why are you stopping me from freely traveling?

It turned out that this agent was a supervisor, and he looked at me with a defeated yet confident look that I recognized from past encounters with men who think that they have the right to harm others rights and persons simply because they have a shiny badge and the misunderstood “authority“ to force their power‘s on others. He did not answer me right away, and I stood my ground with my hand on my baggage until he responded.

He stared at me with not quite a smile and with obvious annoyance, not knowing how to respond to or cleverly avoid my questions. His stance was firm and in a disposition as to be too close for comfort to my own face and his body was in my direct line of travel into the airport proper…

Again I asked: “What are you doing? Are you detaining me?”

And again the answer was “no“.

“Am I free to go?”

“No, not until you’ve been screened.”

I stated clearly then that I did not understand what was happening, and that I did not understand how, if I wasn’t being detained and had not broken any law, how can I not be free to go? This was very illogical and unreasonable, especially since no legal or lawful reason or code had yet to be given to me.

The same answer was given, that I had not gone through the proper screening process.

I stated again that I was certainly just as properly screened as I had been since I can remember whenever I had ever traveled as a kid – when I walked through the metal detector and had my bags scanned. I offered to repeat my previous action of walking through the metal detector if the TSA wished me to repeat this without any hesitation.

At some point during this process this TSA officer had depressed a button on some radio apparatus and requested a police officer and also a TSA manager who was in a suit and tie, not a standard uniform. I questioned his need for calling the airport police as I was not refusing any lawful order or causing any harm to any person or property. He apparently felt that he needed an authoritarian person in a more authoritarian uniform with a stun-gun and revolver to help him justify not answer my questions.

He told me that no, I must stay right there until a manager and the police arrive.

Of course I asked again: “Why? Are you detaining me for some reason?”

He stated that no, he cannot detain me (which I knew) while still blocking my way to travel, and that because I was refusing to go through the proper screening process I therefore could not enter the “sterile and secure environment of the airport”.

To this I reinforced the fact that I was not refusing to do anything or follow any lawful order, and that I would gladly subject myself to this so-called “proper screening process” if the TSA agent could simply show me the law that stated I must do so against my consent. I told him again that I was not acting as a person in commerce or any other activity that can be federally regulated, and that his own U.S. CODE specifically states that the travel of people cannot be restricted under the color of law. I then let him know that on this day I was lawfully traveling and again asked if I was free to go?

It was about this time when a female airport police officer showed up. She was younger with blonde hair. Quite pretty actually, but immediately unjustified in her confrontational language and posture…

The two TSA men, supported by the police officer, then told me that because I had come in contact with my bags before being properly screened (by touching my own property), the bags must be re-x-rayed before I can proceed into the airport. And yet apparently I could not be re-metal-detected myself. His next comment implied that I was refusing to be either irradiated or patted down, to which I answered:

“I am not refusing to do anything, I only ask that you show me the law that grants you authority to force me to go through a radiation emitting full-body scanner or to be patted down without my consent? Please show me the law that grants you any authority to force me to do so and I will gladly comply?”

He insisted that he was acting under Federal law, and that he was not about to go and retrieve the code of federal regulations for TSA to show me where that authority was derived. I was to take his word on this. And so I again re-stated that I am not refusing any order, and was simply waiting for any law or lawful code to be revealed and verified to me before I did something against my good conscious and informed consent against my natural rights.

He guffawed, and that’s when the people in line behind me started to yell obscenities. Their disgusted words were not directed at these unlawful acts of the TSA, but rather surprisingly at me for holding up the line. I was told by the people waiting to be screened that I should cooperate, shut up, and hurry up through the radiation emitting full-body scanner. They were willing subjects, therefore so should I be. Then one referred to me with the moniker of “asshole” in front of the traveling passengers and most notably their small children. I did not acknowledge this, but instead imagined how others in history no doubt had the same experience – not that I would compare my small battle with the likes of Gandhi or MLK. But then for me there is no right too small that is not worth fighting for… or in this case, being abused for by unlawful agents of government.

The police officer started to get involved, reinforcing the lie that I was required to undertake this illegal search and seizure process. I again asked for any law that proved this female police officer’s claim of authority, and the response was that the law was there but would not be shown to me.

I asked the police officer if I was being detained, and the answer was an uncomfortable no. However, she was more forceful with her retort, and attempted to exude an authoritarian appeal.

Since I was not being detained, I stated that this must reasonably and logically mean that I was free to carry on with my travels and so I reached for my baggage again to get on my way. To this, the police officer became belligerent and began to threaten me. Her loud words soon formed the repeated threatening question:

“Do you want to go to jail”?

Like a bully on the schoolyard in front of his peers, again…

“Do you want to go to jail?”

Surprised at her questions and her unprofessional, unconstitutional, and unlawful demeanor, I almost laughed thinking that anyone would actually answer in the affirmative to that type of question. Her tough-guy act was not very impressive – more like a bad parent scolding their kid for nothing but asking an uncomfortable question. Taken aback by this strange surge of testosterone presented by this female officer, I asked what it was that I had done that was against the law that warranted such a question to be asked of me. And again I requested for the police officer to reveal the law that I had apparently violated or explain what it was that she thought was reasonable suspicion or probable cause for detaining me and threatening to send me to jail without first offering to arrest me and allow a bit of due process and “Miranda rights” beforehand.

Of course I would have refused to accept or under-stand any political rights offered by a security guard of a government corporation if she had read them. But it’s the thought that counts.

After a few similar exchanges asking for the law I had broken and why I was being verbally accosted for standing up politely for my natural rights; without any movement, threat, or provocation from myself, the policewoman suddenly stepped at me and grabbed my right arm at the forearm and wrist, to which I allowed her to do without retort or fighting back. She forcibly twisted my arm so that it was forced behind my back and then pressed it in a slightly painful upward position. Unsure of why this woman was attacking me without warning or notice, I did not resist in any way – though her strength and form was certainly not enough to actually hold me in this restraining position. I stayed still under duress and inquired painfully what exactly I had done to warrant such treatment and under what authority she was acting?

At no time did this policewoman state that I was being detained, that I was being placed under arrest, or read any type of rights to me. She just maintained her hold on my arm as I faced the conveyer belt with the whole airport security and passenger crowd and children, TSA, and her police officer male partner watching on. Continuing to ask what gave her the right to do what she was doing while placing me under pain and restraint, instead of lawfully answering my question and declaring her legal intent or purpose, she then began to apply a bit more pressure upward on my arm while standing behind me – now pushing hard enough to actually cause fairly severe pain throughout my arm and shoulder. I stated that she was now hurting me and asked her in pain to please cease and desist. Instead she pressed even harder with still no directions or communications as to the purpose of her assault or as to what I should be doing besides standing there and taking this abuse.

It is important to note that I could not see what was happening behind me during this surreal encounter.

At this point (after what seemed like a long time but was likely a bit less than a minute of actual time) it was my natural reaction to the increased pressure and pain she was causing my arm and shoulder to twist very easily out of her restraining hold of my wrist, at which point I raised both hands non-threateningly halfway in the air at my sides and stated: “I am not resisting.”

She carelessly blurted out: “Yes you are”, to which I stated in a surprisingly confident, calm, and mature manner: “No, I am not. There is nothing to resist!” My adrenaline was now of course pumping a bit. I put my hands down and again asked as calmly as possible after just being attacked by this woman for the law that I was breaking and to point out exactly what thing or lawful demand that I was resisting. There was no order or request made by the officer that I could actually be accused of resisting, and her violent attack was accompanied by no reason for it.

I could not even be accused of resisting arrest, since no mention of even detaining me let alone arresting me was ever mentioned by any party. The aforementioned question of whether or not I wished to go to jail would probably not stand as a demand or proper question for a lawful officer of government to make.

I was however informed later by my traveling friend that the female police officer all but threatened him, stating that we were both not going to be allowed on our flights and that “your friend will likely go to jail”.

I was told after this ordeal by the close friend I was traveling with that the police officer’s partner, a more professional acting Asian man whom I did not speak to personally, walked over and stated something to the offending female ‘s ear before I ceased to be put in pain and broke the grip of this female officer. He thought he might have warned her that she was acting out of line, but I have no proof of what was said between them and again had no view of the scene. I do know that my traveling friend made it very clear to this male partner police officer that I was not “dangerous” and that I was simply asserting my rights, and that this officer concurred and reassured him that it would likely end well if I cooperate. His uniform might have been that of a bicycle cop, and he did not appear to have the authoritarian disposition as his partner.

At this point, tensions were flared and my arm and shoulder was throbbing in pain. The police officer then began asking me more politely for my driver’s license – as if she had not just accosted me. Still confident in my rights, I asked her why she needed to see my license to drive, since I was not operating a motor vehicle and was not in any form of commercial activity today, least of all with the police. I also asked her for her name and information because she had just acted violently against me outside of any perceived authority to do so.

She stated that the Driver’s License was a form of ID and that the law required me to show it to a police officer when it was requested.

Of course, I asked for the law that required me to show my Driver’s License for the purpose of “identification“, stating that I’d gladly hand over my driver’s license even though I was not driving, but simply required proof of claim to her statement that I was required by law to do so, especially to the person who just physically and unlawfully harmed me.

I include the following in this report (though this was not quoted at the actual scene of this crime) for the readers understanding of my request for a law which would violate my inalienable natural rights regarding being required to show my driver’s license as “identification” since it is a political license for a certain purpose, which is certainly not a forced right called “identification”:

License: In the law of contracts, is a permission, accorded by a competent authority, conferring the right to do some act which without such authorization would be illegal, or would be a trespass or tort.” Blacks Law Dictionary, 2nd Ed. (1910).

“The license means to confer on a person the right to do something which otherwise he would not have the right to do.” City of Louisville v. Sebree, 214 S.W. 2D 248; 308 Ky. 420.

“The object of a license is to confer a right or power which does not exist without it.” Pavne v. Massev, 196 S.W. 2D 493; 145 Tex. 273; Shuman v. City of Ft. Wayne, 127 Indiana 109; 26 NE 560, 561 (1891); 194 So 569 (1940).

“A license is a mere permit to do something that without it would be unlawful.” Littleton v. Buress, 82 P. 864, 866; 14 Wyo.173.

“A license, pure and simple, is a mere personal privilege…” River Development Corp. V. Liberty Corp., 133 A. 2d 373, 385; 45 N.J. Super. 445.

“A license is merely a permit or privilege to do what otherwise would be unlawful, and is not a contract between the authority, federal, state or municipal granting it and the person to whom it is granted…”American States Water Services Co. Of Calif. V. Johnson, 88 P.2d 770, 774; 31 Cal. App.2d 606.

A license when granting a privilege, may not, as the terms to its possession, impose conditions which require the abandonment of constitutional rights.” Frost Trucking Co. V. Railroad Commission, 271 US 583, 589 (1924); Terral v. Burke Construction Company, 257 US 529, 532 (1922).

“The word privilege is defined as a particular benefit, favor, or advantage, a right or immunity not enjoyed by all, or it may be enjoyed only under special conditions.” Knoll Gold Club v. U.S., 179 Fed Supp. 377, 380.

“…those things which are considered as inalienable rights which all citizens possess cannot be licensed since those acts are not held to be a privilege.” City of Chicago v. Collins, 51 N.E. 907, 910

Illegitimate and unconstitutional practices get their first footing in that way, by silent approaches and slight deviations from legal modes of procedure. This can only be obviated by adhering to the rule that constitutional provisions for the security of persons and property should be liberally construed.” Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616, 635 (1884); Exparte Rhodes, 202Ala. 68 71.

The State cannot diminish rights of the people.” Hertado v. California, 110 U.S. 516

Statutes that violate the plain and obvious principles of common right and common reason are null and void.” Bennett v. Boggs, 1 Baldw 60.

“Under our system of government upon the individuality and intelligence of the citizen, the state does not claim to control him/her, except as his/her conduct to others, leaving him/her the sole judge as to all that affects himself/herself.” Mugler v. Kansas 123 U.S. 623, 659-60.

“The assertion of federal rights, when plainly and reasonably made, is not to be defeated under the name of local practice.”- Davis v. Wechsler, 263 U.S. 22, 24.

Where rights secured by the constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them.” – Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 491.

The claim and exercise of a constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime.” – Miller v. U.S., 230 F 2d 486, 489.

For a crime to exist, there must be an injured party. There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of this exercise of Constitutional rights.”- Sherar v. Cullen, 481 F. 945.

Link: http://thecountyguard.org/right-2-drive-handout.html

Please note here that there was only one injured party, and that was myself. I was violently engaged in an unwarranted, forceful, and painful hold. And as you will come to see, I was molested publicly for all to see against my will and in full view of the same police officer that assaulted and hurt my arm.

I would also like to point out here that under no circumstance did I identify myself as “cargo” that is required to be “screened” by TSA.

49 USC § 44901 – Screening passengers and property

(5) Screening defined.— In this subsection the term “screening” means a physical examination or non-intrusive methods of assessing whether cargo poses a threat to transportation security. Methods of screening include x-ray systems, explosives detection systems, explosives trace detection, explosives detection canine teams certified by the Transportation Security Administration, or a physical search together with manifest verification. The Administrator may approve additional methods to ensure that the cargo does not pose a threat to transportation security and to assist in meeting the requirements of this subsection. Such additional cargo screening methods shall not include solely performing a review of information about the contents of cargo or verifying the identity of a shipper of the cargo that is not performed in conjunction with other security methods authorized under this subsection, including whether a known shipper is registered in the known shipper database. Such additional cargo screening methods may include a program to certify the security methods used by shippers pursuant to paragraphs (1) and (2) and alternative screening methods pursuant to exemptions referred to in subsection (b) of section 1602 of the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007.

TITLE 49 Section 40102 further defines this legal term, which I never lawfully claimed to be or participate in:

(12) “cargo” means property, mail, or both.

As we can read, there is no defining statement that “people” or “persons” shall be “screened”. And though I know all too well that government refers to humans as “animals” and trades its citizens and prisoners as commodities with CUSIP numbers on the collateralized bond markets, I certainly have never agreed that as a presumed “passenger” I agree to be treated as property or any other form of “cargo”. I am nothing if not solely a living, breathing man.

And you wonder why they wouldn’t show me the law?

Continuing with my official accounting of this day:

She again demanded to acquire my driver’s license, and carefully I stated that I am not refusing to obey her offer or any lawful order she may give, and that I was still waiting to see the law that required such an action on my behalf before I proceeded to be identified through such a license to drive a vehicle against the law.

At no time did I ever refuse any lawful order presented by any officer, but instead kept asking over and over to see any law before I complied with any demand to follow any legal demand. I never received any written law or codified number representing any law by any officer. No law or code was ever presented to me in any way, just as one would expect when dealing with any street gang or private security guard acting violently and without cause, reason, or warrant to do so.

She didn’t like my response, but apparently felt there might be a risk to assault me again, as I informed her that she was acting as an individual outside of her authority for lawsuit purposes.. Instead, she gave me a defeated yet determined look that let me know she would not be backing down as she did not detain me, as if I was somehow being unreasonable.

At some point here a fifth TSA agent forcibly removed my bags from the conveyer belt against my will. He stated that they would be re-screened, though stated no purpose for this action. I verbally stated that a re-screening was not consented to, but that he could do as he pleases with his personal responsibility for his actions, even though they had already been properly x-rayed (screened) once. Perhaps they were negligent in their first capacity?

I pointed out which bags and personal items were mine because I was asked to.

I was again told that I was not properly screened, to which I again disagreed and stated clearly that I had completed the screening process and was declaring this to be true and clear for all witnesses – that my bags were already scanned twice and that my body had walked through the metal detector successfully and offered to repeat this step. I then declared for the record that I did not consent to any other type of screening or physical abuse or restraint from any other party involved unless probable cause and reasonable suspicion could be proven, and that again I will submit if any law could be shown in support of their requests.

I was also told by the TSA supervisor and the female police officer that I had somehow agreed and consented to their unlawful pat-down because there were apparently some posted signs that stated as much when I entered the TSA screening and secured area – the same “security” area I have been entering the airport for 40 years without such presumed consent. I could tell that this was a ploy that they had used before – a well rehearsed con to keep the masses in line.

I stated honestly that I did not see these alleged signs (which I did not) and that I had signed no contract or unilateral agreement nor ever implied that I had read or acknowledged any posted signage. I then stated that “I rebut your presumption of my consent to these signs” in this regard, and then asked to actually see those signs by having the officer point them out and walking over so I could read them. I was told “no” and that I was not allowed to leave the screening area or move. I again asked “Does that mean you are detaining me?” And again the answer was “no“. But of course, they had my bags, and they knew I would not leave without my personal property. Essentially, they were holding my baggage as a hostage to gain my consent.

I then demanded to be shown the alternative entrance to the airport that bypassed this illegal checkpoint and signage so that I was not forced into a presumption of agreement to forced consent to these so-called posted rules, since I was not aware of any law that required me to consent to any signage or any request that had been made of me so far by any party under their official capacity, let alone some signs outside the area that I did not see or get opportunity to read and grant my own informed consent.

Again, the answer was that I could not leave the area, though no law was quoted proving that claim and no arrest or detainment order was given to me. I was not being officially detained but was being threatened that I should not move or again touch my personal property.

I then informed all parties that from this point forward any further actions taken against me or my property would be outside of any authority or jurisdiction of government without first providing a copy of the laws granting that authority, and that any further actions of any type (including any already taken outside of law or under its color) would be taken personally as from natural men and women without the protections of their government badges or perceived authority, and that I would sue anyone personally and also put a lien on and sue for their insurance bond and any and all personal property as remedy for the actions of those who threatened me or took any other action against me under color of law.

I was told that I had actually volunteered to be “screened” by entering the security checkpoint area, and that this included the consent to the signage that apparently stated I must involuntarily consent to a “pat down”. I again asked to be escorted out of the “security area” and shown the alternative entrance into the airport that did not require this tyrannical treatment and manufactured consent, since the process was just stated to be both “voluntary” and “consensual”.

The response was that no, I could not leave the security area and that there was not alternative entrance to the airport – that I was required to be screened in this area.

I asked why then had the police officer misstated the fact that this was a voluntary process, and again to please show me the law that requires this screening process against my will and informed consent to a voluntary process?

Because the TSA stopping my right to travel was still holding up the line of people waiting to be screened behind me, the frustrated agents and police officer suggested that we move to “a more private location” so that I can be illegally patted down without my consent. I stated clearly that I would not go anywhere that there were no witnesses and would not follow the TSA agent to the empty side of the screening area or out of view of the “public“ unless he could show me a law that required this. I agreed instead to walk bare-footed with a hurt shoulder and arm to the end of the conveyer and to the next machine to the right where the full body pat down procedures generally take place but no further. I still was not allowed to touch my personal property, which was eventually brought over to the area by one of the TSA agents who claimed that it was now properly screened.

I wondered what kind of screening it had underwent before that was not proper – the normal process – but did not ask.

Insisting that I could not proceed into the airport, the agents brought my personal belongings and baggage over to this metal table, and insisted that I could not touch my things until I was patted down. I verified that they were detaining my personal property without probable cause to do so and without showing any law or authority to do so.

Also, the TSA manager in a suit and tie had joined the group before this, and so I again stated that I do not under any circumstances consent to any of these actions or requests for a “full-body pat down”, though I would gladly comply with the law that requires it if that law were to be shown to me. To this I was ignored and received more frustrated sarcastic looks. And so I again informed the TSA supervisor, manager, and police officer that any actions taken by them would be taken on their own personal behalf, outside of any lawful or any governmental agency protections, unless they showed my their authority under the law. I also repeatedly stated that I would sue anyone there personally who violated my natural or any other form of rights under color of law by touching my body in any way without my consent, as well as to sue their departments and any insurance bonds attached to their positions as legal officers of a government. I warned them that this meant their personal property was liable for remedy in court. Their response was not so much verbal as it was confusion and in-credulousness.

The TSA manager and uniformed supervisor then informed me that I was required to obtain a pat down before I would be allowed into the “sterile environment” once again.

I again asked if I was being detained?

Again the answer was no.

Again I asked the TSA and police officers if I wasn’t being detained, why I was not free to go?

And again the answer was that I had not been properly screened, and that I could not take my “baggage” until I was “properly screened”.

After a few minutes of conversational rhetoric, the TSA manager told the supervisor it was OK to pat me down, to which I stated clearly and precisely that I did not consent to this unlawful procedure. The supervisor who would conduct the illegal pat-down was confused and annoyed as I repeatedly looked him in the eyes and stated that I do not consent to his touching any part of my body, and that any such action on his part would be taken on his own accord without the protection of law, and that he would be personally liable for any of his actions in this regard.

Meanwhile, the rubber gloves were snapped on by the TSA supervisor.

After multiple verbal restatements of my non-consent to being “patted down” or to any other “touching” of my person, I stated again clearly in full earshot of the police officer and the TSA manager that I do not consent and that any actions would be taken as an assault under duress and legal action would follow.

When asked to put my arms in the air at my sides, I complied with the action while stating that no, I do not consent to this action or the search. I remained as calm as anyone can while being publicly humiliated and molested in front of mothers, children, and a helpless and concerned friend (who later took three opioid relaxation pills to calm his nerves after witnessing all of this and being threatened that he would not be able to fly on his airline).

Again, I stated for the record that I never agreed to be patted down or touched in anyway. Even as I put my arms in the air, I continuously told all parties that I did not agree or consent to this process.

The TSA Supervisor went through his routinely worded script, stating officially exactly where he would be touching me next. And to each item requested I stated that I did not consent to that and that he was acting in his own capacity while molesting me in public in front of multiple witnesses. Of course, he showed concern at this, but was egged on by his boss – the TSA manager in a suit and tie – who by the way was perfectly cordial and polite with me as he watched me being inappropriately and illegally molested without my consent.

When the TSA supervisor was going to touch me on my penis and scrotum, he went through the motions and asked me first whether or not I had any sensitive areas on my body that he should avoid or be careful around.

I stated that my whole body was in fact very sensitive, and that I did not consent to his touching any part of my very sensitive body. At this point I made eye contact with the female police officer and told her that she would be called as witness to these illegal acts, to which she stated that yes she would act as an official witness. I verified this in triplicate with verbal affirmation from this “police officer”.

He proceeded to grab my ankles and as he slid his hands upward, he stated that he would be touching me from my feet to my “torso”, to which I again stated that no, I do not consent to being touched in any way whatsoever, and that if he proceeded he was acting on his own accord outside of the law and of his position within the Transportation Security Agency.

Even after my statement of non-consent, he continued with his scripted words telling me that he was now going to continue the search up to where my legs met with my “torso”, and that he may touch my private areas with the “back of his hand”.

I stated that absolutely not would I consent to that, and he proceeded to “pat” me up, touching firmly where my leg and scrotum met and brushing my genitalia.

I stated clearly that this was not my “torso”, and that he had just touched a sensitive and very private area without my permission or consent, which is called molestation. I can only imagine the cognitive dissonance this agent must have been going through at this moment.

Next, he positioned himself behind me and felt the bare skin between my pants and underwear as he narrated his molestation actions, his fingers reaching inside my pants and around my “torso“. He again told me that he would be touching my “sensitive area” of the buttocks with the “back of the hand”, which he did against my verbally expressed non-consent to such an action.

Eventually, the gloves came off and were placed on the bomb-sniffing robot or whatever that apparatus is. It occurred to me that at any time he could very easily have planted evidence for that machine to pick up.

This went on until finally the TSA supervisor stated behind my back that: “You are now properly screened. Thank you.”

I stated sarcastically, “No sir, thank you!!! You will be sued!”

During this process I repeatedly demanded to be given identification and personal mailing addresses so that I may direct my legal case to the proper parties involved. I was of course met with resistance here, as I’m sure they took me very seriously based on my verbage. I did receive a business card from both the police officer and the TSA manager, with the name of the supervisor on the back. This was all the ID I could get.

Inversely, the Manager begged and pleaded for me to hand over my driver’s license so that he could file a “incident report”, and would not let me leave until I did. He was not detaining me, but would not let me touch my bags and property until I did so. He asked for my airline boarding pass so that he could “inform Delta Airlines” that there was a passenger who caused an incident by refusing the screening process. After hesitation, and in stating that in no way am I acting in commercial activities, driving in any way, participating in commerce of any type, or that this “license to drive” in any way implies “identification”, I handed over my driver’s license and boarding pass to the manager so that he could correctly fill out his report, and he took them across the security area to copy the information.

When I asked for a copy of that report, he refused stating that it would not be ready for a couple of days and that it was not a public document.

The police officer then asked me to give her my “driver’s license” for her records, to which I refused the request unless she had a law that showed I must comply with that request, since I was not “driving”. I offered to hold the driver’s license in the air so that she could read what she wanted from it, stating again that in no way was I offering “identification” or operating in any regulated commercial action.

Frustrated, she copied down the information she wanted as I held out the driver‘s license. I did show her my boarding pass when she requested it.

When she asked if the address on my card was my current address, I answered no, and refused to offer any more information without a law stating that I must. She demanded my current address again, and I rebutted the legal presumption of her authority to demand that information again. She did not abuse me anymore, though I believe she wanted to.

In the end, as I was finally “free to go” into the airport without one of these people stepping in my way and without actually detaining me, contorting my arm in pain, or using my luggage as a hostage.

The Manager told me then as if we were back-stage that he understood what I was doing in standing up for my rights and that he respected that. I responded by stating that in no way did he show any respect and that he was just witness, accomplice, and agitator in an illegal activity outside of his lawful place. He told me he was just doing his job, to which I replied yeah, I know, you’d beat my head in if it would feed your family. I was already told that by your airport police last time they violated my rights.

My traveling companion was severely stressed at this point, ironically angry at me for standing up for my rights rather than being angry at TSA for physically molesting me in his presence and against my will. He let me know that the police woman told him in a threatening way that we would both be missing our flight and that I would likely be going to jail. I was not stopped or questioned by the airline or TSA on the rest of this flight or on my returning flight.

The second police officer, to the best of my knowledge, acted in accordance with the law and was reassuring to my friend. As far as I know, he stepped in when the police woman inappropriately put me in a painful hold and possibly informed her that she was acting outside of her capacity. This  is only hearsay that was forwarded by my traveling companion, but I wish to commend this man for being an upstanding officer – the only one in this account.

For the purposes of this disclosure, I have chosen to withhold the names of the parties involved, but will certainly be suing those parties to the full extent of the law as well as assembling a grand jury to attempt to force the TSA to post appropriate signage about consent and voluntarism regarding this screening process. While I believe I should be compensated greatly for this pain and suffering I have been put through as in any other molestation or rape case, I am much more interested in forcing this rouge corporation of government to cease and desist such illegal activates so that all others may travel freely without molestation by presumed and forced consent under threat and duress.

If anyone reading this would like to help in a financial or legal capacity and make this case an international thorn in the side of a corrupt government, please contact me.

Though I do not claim to derive any personal or political “rights” from any government document or constitution, I do state that government has a constitution that names and restricts its own rights against people, and many court precedents that show that the natural right of travel supersedes any other political or positive legal concoction placed over that natural right. But the constitution only restricts government when lawfully applied, and most people are afraid to sue government to this end. Here is just one of many precedent-setting court opinions:

“As the Supreme Court notes in Saenz v Roe, 98-97 (1999), the Constitution does not contain the word “travel” in any context, let alone an explicit right to travel (except for members of Congress, who are guaranteed the right to travel to and from Congress). The presumed right to travel, however, is firmly established in U.S. law and precedent. In U.S. v Guest, 383 U.S. 745 (1966), the Court noted, “It is a right that has been firmly established and repeatedly recognized.” In fact, in Shapiro v Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 (1969), Justice Stewart noted in a concurring opinion that “it is a right broadly assertable against private interference as well as governmental action. Like the right of association, … it is a virtually unconditional personal right, guaranteed by the Constitution to us all.”

I thank you for reading my account of crime and molestation that took place on Saturday, April 27th, 2013, and hope that it may further the cause to end what may only be called true tyranny and oppression in this country.

The preceding has been my best and honest recounting of the events of this day, from approximately 1pm to just after 2pm Mountain time zone. I will be demanding the film footage from the airport and TSA as soon as possible, and stepping up to the plate to change this mistaken and implied ability of any government agency to trample on anyone’s natural rights of travel.

Oh, and for reference… I present below my former (filmed) encounter with the “airport police” at Salt Lake City Airport, which includes the violation of my rights as well as me being informed that “free speech is not absolute”, and that I “would need a permit for free speech” in the airport. Please note my peaceful yet confident and firm demeanor with these security guards as representative of my disposition and temperament regarding this new incident as reported above.

And watch the media spin and lies here:

.

Also, for the record, I submit the following information as the reasons that I do not submit to  a full-body imager or “back-scatter” radiation emitting device. This is the information I was handing out at the airport in the above videos:

–=–

Opt Out!

The Facts About The Whole Body Imager Device

–=–

Is It Constitutional?

The 4th amendment to the constitution specifically states:

“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, SHALL NOT BE VIOLATED, and Warrants shall not be issued, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”

Is It Stopping Terrorism?

Thousands of illegal immigrants come across the southern border of these United States unchallenged, while an honest American cannot go about his own country without being subjugated to an illegal search and seizure at the airport, and get molested by TSA agents for declaring their rights to “Opt-Out”.

Is It Photographing And Storing Your Naked Photos?

“It will show the private parts of people, but what we’ve decided is that we’re not going to blur those out, because it severely limits the detection capabilities… It is possible to see genitals and breasts while they’re going through the machine…” -Cheryl Johnson- Office of Transport Security manager

These “devices are designed and deployed in a way that allows the images to be routinely stored and recorded, which is exactly what the Marshals Service is doing… We think it’s significant.” -EPIC executive director Marc Rotenberg in interview with CNET

“Approximately 35,314 images… have been stored on the Brijot Gen2 machine…” used in the Orlando, Fla. Federal Courthouse. -William Bordley- Associate General Counsel with the Marshals Service

A 70-page document showing the TSA’s procurement specifications, classified as “sensitive security information” says that, in some modes the scanner must “allow exporting of image data in real time” and provide a mechanism for “high-speed transfer of image data” over the network. It also says that image filters will “protect the identity, modesty, and privacy of the passenger.” –Procurement Specification For Whole Body Imager Devices For Checkpoint Operations, report by U.S. Department of Homeland Security, TSA

TSA spokeswoman Sari Koshetz lied to CNET, stating that the agency’s scanners are delivered to airports with the image recording functions turned off. “We’re not recording them… I’m reiterating that to the public. We are not ever activating those capabilities at the airport”

Can These Scanners Cause Cancer?

“Some studies reported significant genetic damage while others, although similar, showed none…” -Boian Alexandrov- Center for Nonlinear Studies at Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico

Although the forces generated from these scanners are tiny, resonant effects allow THz waves to unzip double-stranded DNA, creating bubbles in the double strand that could significantly interfere with processes such as gene expression and DNA replication. Translation: It destroys your DNA! -Boian Alexandrov- Center for Nonlinear Studies at Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico

“…any X-ray photon may be the one which sets in motion the high-speed, high energy electron which causes a carcinogenic or atherogenic (smooth muscle) mutation. Such mutations rarely disappear. The higher their accumulated number in a population, the higher will be the population’s mortality rates from radiation-induced cancer and ischemic heart disease.” -Dr. John Gofman- Professor Emeritus of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley.

Gofman’s studies indicate that radiation from medical diagnostics and treatment is a causal co-factor in 50 percent of America’s cancers and 60 percent of our ischemic (blood flow blockage) heart disease. He stresses that the frequency with which Americans are medically X-rayed “makes for a significant radiological impact”. -Dr. John Gofman- Professor Emeritus of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley.

Children and passengers with gene mutations – around one in 20 of the population – are more at risk as they are less able to repair X-ray damage to their DNA. The most likely risk from the airport scanners is a common type of skin cancer called basal cell carcinoma. -Dr. David Brenner- head of Columbia University’s Centre For Radiological Research

“If all 800 million people who use airports every year were screened with X-rays then the very small individual risk multiplied by the large number of screened people might imply a potential public health or societal risk. The population risk has the potential to be significant… If there are increases in cancers as a result of irradiation of children, they would most likely appear some decades in the future. It would be prudent not to scan the head and neck… There really is no other technology around where we’re planning to X-ray such an enormous number of individuals. It’s really unprecedented in the radiation world.” -Dr. David Brenner- head of Columbia University’s Centre For Radiological Research

“They say the risk is minimal, but statistically someone is going to get skin cancer from these X-rays… No exposure to X-ray is considered beneficial. We know X-rays are hazardous but we have a situation at the airports where people are so eager to fly that they will risk their lives in this manner…” -Dr Michael Love-, Department of Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

“While the dose would be safe if it were distributed throughout the volume of the entire body, the dose to the skin may be dangerously high,” they wrote. “We still don’t know the beam intensity or other details of their classified system…” -John Sedat- Biochemist, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF)

“Collectively, the radiation doses from the scanners incrementally increase the risk of fatal cancers among the thousands or millions of travelers who will be exposed, some radiation experts believe… We don’t have enough information to make a decision on whether there’s going to be a biological effect or not.” -Douglas Boreham- professor in medical physics and applied radiation sciences at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario

“The thing that worries me the most, is not what happens if the machine works as advertised, but what happens if it doesn’t” -Peter Rez- Arizona State University

“[We] cannot exclude the possibility of a fatal cancer attributable to radiation in a very large population of people exposed to very low doses of radiation.” -National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, from a 2002 report that studied these security devices.

“Based on our results we argue that a specific terahertz radiation exposure may significantly affect the natural dynamics of DNA, and thereby influence intricate molecular processes involved in gene expression and DNA replication.” -Technology Review article from: http://arxiv.org/abs/0910.5294

In other words… millimeter wave scanning devices may damage your DNA!

–=–

Report by Clint Richardson of We Are Change Utah (wearechangeutah.org) with references provided for your own research.

–=–

Thanks for your public support in these trying times!

Yours in solidarity…

And walking the walk so that hopefully others wont have to…

.

–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Tuesday, May 8th, 2013

Understanding The Contractual Relationship


In my last post, “To Protect And Serve” (link), we discussed the nature of the contractual relationship between the people and government. The importance of this relationship cannot be understated, as the authority and jurisdiction of government CODE, legal requirements, licenses, taxation, imprisonment, and everything else that is forced upon the people is done so through contract. And force is used upon the people when the stipulations of a legal contract are not met and the people decide to not cooperate with the law enforcement officers who protect and serve the people on behalf of government. As we discussed, protecting and serving does not mean protecting and serving your God-given natural rights, but instead it means to enforce the law through the protection of its continuity and uniformity, as well as to serve you with arrest, summons, process, and notices. To protect does not mean to defend you, and to serve does not mean to be hospitable to you or help you.

Again, the understanding of the following U.S. CODE explains this quite well…

42 USC § 1981 – Equal rights under the law

(a) Statement of equal rights

All persons within the jurisdiction of the United States shall have the same right in every State and Territory to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, give evidence, and to the full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings for the security of persons and property as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, penalties, taxes, licenses, and exactions of every kind, and to no other.

(b) “Make and enforce contracts” defined

For purposes of this section, the term “make and enforce contracts” includes the making, performance, modification, and termination of contracts, and the enjoyment of all benefits, privileges, terms, and conditions of the contractual relationship.

Protecting your rights to be punished, put in pain, penalized, taxed, forced to obtain licenses, and exacted (extorted) from is the job of a police officer, and the service of these “benefits” and “privileges” of extortion through process, notice, and summons is the requisite of that protection – the protection of the right of government to extort.

But the important aspect for the implementation of this protection and service is all based on what paragraph (b) defines as the contractual relationship. This relationship between you and government must be understood if ever you wish to stand up against this legal extortion via contract.

The interaction of police with you as a contracted or licensed citizen is a prerequisite for this interaction. In other words, the police must “identify” you through license or other form of identification in order to serve you with a process, summons, or notice. Agreeing to this contractual relationship is agreeing to being protected and served… and arrested, put in pain, and punished for non-compliance of contract.

A police officer cannot lawfully interact with you unless you are legally contracted with his corporation (government), giving him jurisdiction and authority (your permission and consent) to do so. As a citizen and licensed driver, you are within this contractual relationship.

The best way to understand this need for police to verify your legal person through legal license or other identification is to revisit an old confrontation I had with the Salt Lake City Airport Police. Keep in mind as you are watching this video that I did not have a contract in the form of a “permit” to be in the airport handing out fliers. I was in a public area, not within a secured area. As you are watching, you will realize what I was realizing as this event unfolded – that these police officers had no authority or jurisdiction over me or my actions because I did not sign a contract called a permit. If I had obtained this permit for free speech, I would have been subject to their will. But without the contract, they knew that they had no real power over me… except that of threat and coercion.

In my opinion, this was one of the most important “caught on tape” moments in modern history, and so here it is again. Enjoy!

Part 1:

“Free speech is not absolute.” – David J. Bywater, Airport Police

Illogical, irrational, unreasonable…

Notice that the police officer states as fact that if I violate the stipulations of the permit (which I don’t have), then and only then are my actions a misdemeanor. So why would I then sign a permit limiting my rights and giving this idiot permission to protect and serve me by arresting me and serving me process? He then states that I can get in trouble for not getting a permit – charged for the crime of not obtaining permission for free speech… That’s about as ridiculous as being charged with resisting arrest with no other charges for being arrested in the first place.

So if I don’t cooperate with military rule by obtaining a permit, martial law tactics of violence by police will be enforced. Cooperate with martial law military statutes or become a prisoner of the Civil War with no ending? Do you get it yet, folks?

Now watch as the media spins this and makes us look ineffectual. Notice that I completely explained the situation, and gave the media the opportunity to report on the absolute violation by Airport Police of my rights. Instead, they chose to protect the government; which is really their first priority – just as it is the police’s first priority. I also handed them my flier, chalked full of information about these scanners. Yet not one mention to the public as a service to the people. This is why you should never trust your major media, which is owned through collective government investments by the very governments (private corporations) who are destroying our way of life:

Part 2:

If you understand what happened here, you now understand that the contractual relationship between you and government is everything, and it allows the tyranny that you just saw and live under every day. Perhaps you haven’t experienced it first hand yet, but you will… Perhaps when forced vaccination of your child comes to town, or the banning of your fresh organic backyard garden that you don’t have a permit for. The contractual relationship is what allows peaceful military rule through the cooperation of the citizenry and through a martial law De facto government. The only reason that you don’t see the fact that martial law already does and has been in place since 1863 (General Orders 100) is simply the fact that you are contractually obligated to be cooperative and peaceful like sheep – and you consent to this every day. These police are acting under martial law, though they wont admit it or don’t comprehend it themselves. All police and military are the secret police, you see?

In these situations, the most important responsibility for you is to attempt to educate these men, who are acting under color of law but not true law. Your fate will be in the hands of these men some day.

If only I knew then what I know now…

Original Opt Out Day post with full radiation information on body scanners is here:

https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2010/11/28/national-opt-out-day-the-most-important-story-you-missed/

Read it. Understand it. Print it. Us it!

.

–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Wednesday, August 15th, 2012

What Cops Don’t Know May Kill You


Back to some good old fashioned public official confrontations. My favorite!

I was always curious about this, and now I know…

A police officer who does not know what the word “consent” means is just about the most frightening thing I can imagine when dealing with these officers of the corporate code. A whole United States military and police department without such knowledge, and the true nature of our society comes rushing in.

Note that this was on Veteran’s Day, and that there was no good reason for these city workers to be replacing this sign on a holiday. It merely changed one word, “dusk”, as the time to exit the park.

Note also that this was very much yet another media photo op, and that they took about 20 minutes to change over this sign while each camera-person got their footage.

.

–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Sunday, November 20, 2011

CAFR Confession


A friend and listener to our local AM station took our interview with the mayor of Salt Lake County, where he admits to the county CAFR and over $650 million in extra fund balances. He also included the CAFR pages I read from as reference.

Though I already posted the interview (audio only), I feel like this is the most important public official confession as to the wealth of the government as shown in government’s financial statements.

Please pass this on…

Also, learn more about government Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports (CAFR’s) with CAFR School, here:

Part 1: The State of Wisconsin CAFR –

https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2011/03/01/wisconsins-real-financial-situation-explained/

Part 2: Introduction to CAFR – City of Aurora, Co –

https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2011/03/03/cafr-school-a-lesson-in-financial-accounting/

Part 3: Advanced study – State of Minnesota CAFR –

https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2011/03/09/cafr-school-part-2-minnesotas-state-cafrs-explained/

Now compare these to your own local, county state, and school district CAFR’s.

.

–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Tuesday, July 12, 2011

 

 

 

 

National Opt Out Day: The most important story you missed


Think you live in a free country?

You’ll think again after seeing this:

.

Part 1:

Now watch as the media spins this and makes us look ineffectual. This is why you should never trust your major media, which is owned through collective government investments by the very governments (private corporations) who are destroying our way of life:

Part 2:

November 24, 2010 was the national opt-out day across America, where individual citizens like myself in groups like We Are Change went to airports on our own time and protested the TSA’s blatant and unconstitutional use of unreasonable searches and seizure… and of cancer causing and DNA destroying full body scanners on innocent travelers.

I learned something very important on this day.

I learned that the Airport Police and other government agencies (private corporations) for which these police work for require you to get a permit to protest not because they are keeping the peace, but because they have no authority over the people who wish to exercise their right of free speech unless we enter into a contract – known as a permit or license – for which we are then required to follow the rules and regulations of that permit, since it is a signed contract between you and the private corporate government.

Without it, because I refused to acquire one, these police could not detain or remove me. For if they did, there would be no law or code broken, no crime committed, and therefore no charges to file against me… BECAUSE I WAS NOT UNDER CONTRACT (PERMIT)!

In the video above, the policeman who admittedly works for the Salt Lake City Corporation, a private for-profit corporation (municipality) acting in lieu of my city government, told me that “free speech is not absolute” and that I would need a permit to practice my free speech anywhere in the city, even on my own street. And yet I have Mormons, Girl Scouts, Students, and all sorts of salesmen and activists coming to my door trying to sell me one thing or another. Do they all need permits as well? The other policeman agreed that he’d beat my head in if he was told to do so because hey, “you gotta feed your family somehow”.

.

This smells like a lawsuit to me! What do you think? Comment below…

.

.

Here is the information sheet (front and back) that I was passing out…

Note: To download the paper, click here:

M.Word document: Opt Out

PDF document: Opt Out

—≈—

Opt Out!

The Facts About The Whole Body Imager Device

Is It Constitutional?

The 4th amendment to the constitution specifically states:

“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, SHALL NOT BE VIOLATED, and Warrants shall not be issued, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”

 

Is It Stopping Terrorism?

Thousands of illegal immigrants come across the southern border of these United States unchallenged, while an honest American cannot go about his own country without being subjugated to an illegal search and seizure at the airport, and get molested by TSA agents for declaring their rights to “Opt-Out”.

Is It Photographing And Storing Your Naked Photos?

“It will show the private parts of people, but what we’ve decided is that we’re not going to blur those out, because it severely limits the detection capabilities… It is possible to see genitals and breasts while they’re going through the machine…” -Cheryl Johnson- Office of Transport Security manager

These “devices are designed and deployed in a way that allows the images to be routinely stored and recorded, which is exactly what the Marshals Service is doing… We think it’s significant.” -EPIC executive director Marc Rotenberg in interview with CNET

“Approximately 35,314 images… have been stored on the Brijot Gen2 machine…” used in the Orlando, Fla. Federal Courthouse. -William Bordley- Associate General Counsel with the Marshals Service

A 70-page document showing the TSA’s procurement specifications, classified as “sensitive security information” says that, in some modes the scanner must “allow exporting of image data in real time” and provide a mechanism for “high-speed transfer of image data” over the network. It also says that image filters will “protect the identity, modesty, and privacy of the passenger.” –Procurement Specification For Whole Body Imager Devices For Checkpoint Operations, report by U.S. Department of Homeland Security, TSA

TSA spokeswoman Sari Koshetz lied to CNET, stating that the agency’s scanners are delivered to airports with the image recording functions turned off. “We’re not recording them… I’m reiterating that to the public. We are not ever activating those capabilities at the airport”

Can These Scanners Cause Cancer?

“Some studies reported significant genetic damage while others, although similar, showed none…” -Boian Alexandrov- Center for Nonlinear Studies at Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico

Although the forces generated from these scanners are tiny, resonant effects allow THz waves to unzip double-stranded DNA, creating bubbles in the double strand that could significantly interfere with processes such as gene expression and DNA replication. Translation: It destroys your DNA! -Boian Alexandrov- Center for Nonlinear Studies at Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico

“…any X-ray photon may be the one which sets in motion the high-speed, high energy electron which causes a carcinogenic or atherogenic (smooth muscle) mutation. Such mutations rarely disappear. The higher their accumulated number in a population, the higher will be the population’s mortality rates from radiation-induced cancer and ischemic heart disease.” -Dr. John Gofman- Professor Emeritus of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley.

Gofman’s studies indicate that radiation from medical diagnostics and treatment is a causal co-factor in 50 percent of America’s cancers and 60 percent of our ischemic (blood flow blockage) heart disease. He stresses that the frequency with which Americans are medically X-rayed “makes for a significant radiological impact”. -Dr. John Gofman- Professor Emeritus of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley.

Children and passengers with gene mutations – around one in 20 of the population – are more at risk as they are less able to repair X-ray damage to their DNA. The most likely risk from the airport scanners is a common type of skin cancer called basal cell carcinoma. -Dr. David Brenner- head of Columbia University’s Centre For Radiological Research

“If all 800 million people who use airports every year were screened with X-rays then the very small individual risk multiplied by the large number of screened people might imply a potential public health or societal risk. The population risk has the potential to be significant… If there are increases in cancers as a result of irradiation of children, they would most likely appear some decades in the future. It would be prudent not to scan the head and neck… There really is no other technology around where we’re planning to X-ray such an enormous number of individuals. It’s really unprecedented in the radiation world.” -Dr. David Brenner- head of Columbia University’s Centre For Radiological Research

“They say the risk is minimal, but statistically someone is going to get skin cancer from these X-rays… No exposure to X-ray is considered beneficial. We know X-rays are hazardous but we have a situation at the airports where people are so eager to fly that they will risk their lives in this manner…” -Dr Michael Love-, Department of Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

“While the dose would be safe if it were distributed throughout the volume of the entire body, the dose to the skin may be dangerously high,” they wrote. “We still don’t know the beam intensity or other details of their classified system…” -John Sedat- Biochemist, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF)

“Collectively, the radiation doses from the scanners incrementally increase the risk of fatal cancers among the thousands or millions of travelers who will be exposed, some radiation experts believe… We don’t have enough information to make a decision on whether there’s going to be a biological effect or not.” -Douglas Boreham- professor in medical physics and applied radiation sciences at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario

“The thing that worries me the most, is not what happens if the machine works as advertised, but what happens if it doesn’t” -Peter Rez- Arizona State University

“[We] cannot exclude the possibility of a fatal cancer attributable to radiation in a very large population of people exposed to very low doses of radiation.” -National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, from a 2002 report that studied these security devices.

“Based on our results we argue that a specific terahertz radiation exposure may significantly affect the natural dynamics of DNA, and thereby influence intricate molecular processes involved in gene expression and DNA replication.” -Technology Review article from: http://arxiv.org/abs/0910.5294

In other words… millimeter wave scanning devices may damage your DNA!

Report by Clint Richardson of We Are Change Utah (wearechangeutah.org) with references provided for your own research.

–≈–

Reprint [begin excerpt]

Update: Here’s a bit of code you should look into and ask your self… why is the United States government immune to this???

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00002332—h000-.html

TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 113B > § 2332h
§ 2332h. Radiological dispersal devices

(a) Unlawful Conduct.—

(1) In general.— Except as provided in paragraph (2), it shall be unlawful for
any person to knowingly produce, construct, otherwise acquire, transfer directly
or indirectly, receive, possess, import, export, or use, or possess and threaten
to use —

(A) any weapon that is designed or intended to release radiation or
radioactivity at a level dangerous to human life; or

(B) any device or other object that is capable of and designed or intended to
endanger human life through the release of radiation or radioactivity.

(2) Exception.— This subsection does not apply with respect to—

(A) conduct by or under the authority of the United States or any department or agency thereof; or

(B) conduct pursuant to the terms of a contract with the United States or any department or agency thereof.

(b) Jurisdiction.— Conduct prohibited by subsection (a) is within the jurisdiction of the United States if—

(1) the offense occurs in or affects interstate or foreign commerce;
(2) the offense occurs outside of the United States and is committed by a national of the United States;
(3) the offense is committed against a national of the United States while the national is outside the United States;
(4) the offense is committed against any property that is owned, leased, or used by the United
States or by any department or agency of the United States, whether the property is within or outside the United States; or
(5) an offender aids or abets any person over whom jurisdiction exists under this subsection in committing an offense under this section or conspires with any person over whom jurisdiction exists under this subsection to commit an offense under this section.

(c) Criminal Penalties.—

(1) In general.— Any person who violates, or attempts or conspires to violate,
subsection (a) shall be fined not more than $2,000,000 and shall be sentenced to
a term of imprisonment not less than 25 years or to imprisonment for life.

(2) Other circumstances.— Any person who, in the course of a violation of
subsection (a), uses, attempts or conspires to use, or possesses and threatens
to use, any item or items described in subsection (a), shall be fined not more
than $2,000,000 and imprisoned for not less than 30 years or imprisoned for
life.

(3) Special circumstances.— If the death of another results from a person’s
violation of subsection (a), the person shall be fined not more than $2,000,000
and punished by imprisonment for life.

[end excerpt]

Sent by:
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

–≈–

.
.

Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)

Sunday, November 28, 2010