How All Presidents Are Related To King John


In my attempts to expose the genealogical “royal” bloodline – the passing of pure blood type as opposed to mere genealogical “family tree” relation – I came across a researcher from Ancestry.com named Tim Dowling. On his site, and reproduced below, Mr. Dowling has connected the trees of all U.S. Presidents to the Plantagenet King John circa 12oo A.D.

DIRECTIONS: To see the full charts or tree for each president, click on the “Relationship to King John” link below, and then on the next page click either the “tree” link or the link below that which looks like this:

Ancestry of George Washington, President up to John of England, King   See

This presentation will hopefully satisfy those who were not satisfied with my previous presentation of mere cousin relationships between all U.S. Presidents, which can partially be found at this link: http://www.geni.com/blog/look-whos-related-george-washington-and-all-the-presidents-325451.html

Please click on the links in this chart for detailed geneology connections to the “royal” blood, and remember…

“It should be noted that Americans whose ancestors came from continental Europe in the colonial period and the 19th Century are unlikely to easily delineate descent from Charlemagne in their background. There was a separation of classes in Europe and the blood of the rulers seldom flowed legitimately into the blood of the nobility and commoners…”

–Jewels of the Crown – “A newsletter of the Order of the Crown of Charlemagne in the United States of America”

Passing legitimate blood type is not the same as being “related” or cousins…

–=–

1 9th Cousin, 10th Cousin of First Lady George Washington 1789-1797 Relationship to:
King John of England
2 5th Cousin, 9th Cousin of First Lady John Adams 1797-1801 Relationship to:
King John of England
3 11th Cousin Thomas Jefferson 1801-1809 Relationship to:
King John of England
4 8th Cousin, 9th Cousin of First Lady James Madison 1809-1817 Relationship to:
King John of England
5 13th Cousin James Monroe 1817-1825 Relationship to:
King John of England
6 6th Cousin, 10th Cousin of First Lady John Quincy Adams 1825-1829 Relationship to:
King John of England
7 11th Cousin Andrew Jackson 1829-1837 Relationship to:
King John of England
8 23rd Cousin, 24th Cousin of First Lady Martin Van Buren 1837-1841 Relationship to:
King John of England
9 7th Cousin, 6th Cousin of First Lady William H. Harrison 1841 Relationship to:
King John of England
10 10th Cousin John Tyler 1841-1845 Relationship to:
King John of England
11 14th Cousin James Polk 1845-1849 Relationship to:
King John of England
12 5th Cousin Zachary Taylor 1849-1850 Relationship to:
King John of England
13 5th Cousin, 5th Cousin of First Lady Millard Fillmore 1850-1853 Relationship to:
King John of England
14 5th Cousin, 10th Cousin of First Lady Franklin Pierce 1853-1857 Relationship to:
King John of England
15 14th Cousin James Buchanan 1857-1861 Relationship to:
King John of England
16 6th Cousin Abraham Lincoln 1861-1865 Relationship to:
King John of England
17 14th Cousin Andrew Johnson 1865-1869 Relationship to:
King John of England
18 6th Cousin, 12th Cousin of First Lady Ulysses S. Grant 1869-1877 Relationship to:
King John of England
19 6th Cousin Rutherford B. Hayes 1877-1881 Relationship to:
King John of England
20 6th Cousin, 7th Cousin of First Lady James Garfield 1881 Relationship to:
King John of England
21 8th Cousin, 12th Cousin of First Lady Chester Arthur 1881-1885 Relationship to:
King John of England
22 7th Cousin, 15th Cousin of First Lady Grover Cleveland 1885-1889 Relationship to:
King John of England
23 8th Cousin Benjamin Harrison 1889-1893 Relationship to:
King John of England
24 7th Cousin, 15th Cousin of First Lady Grover Cleveland 1893-1897 Relationship to:
King John of England
25 16th Cousin, 4th Cousin of First Lady William McKinley 1897-1901 Relationship to:
King John of England
26 8th Cousin, 6th Cousin of First Lady Theodore Roosevelt 1901-1909 Relationship to:
King John of England
27 7th Cousin William H. Taft 1909-1913 Relationship to:
King John of England
28 13th Cousin, 9th Cousin of First Lady Woodrow Wilson 1913-1921 Relationship to:
King John of England
29 7th Cousin, 5th Cousin of First Lady Warren Harding 1921-1923 Relationship to:
King John of England
30 9th Cousin, 8th Cousin of First Lady Calvin Coolidge 1923-1929 Relationship to:
King John of England
31 10th Cousin, 17th Cousin of First Lady Herbert Hoover 1929-1933 Relationship to:
King John of England
32 6th Cousin, 9th Cousin of First Lady Franklin D. Roosevelt 1933-1945 Relationship to:
King John of England
33 13th Cousin, 9th Cousin of First Lady Harry Truman 1945-1953 Relationship to:
King John of England
34 15th Cousin, 9th cousin of First Lady Dwight D. Eisenhower 1953-1961 Relationship to:
King John of England
35 18th Cousin John F. Kennedy 1961-1963 Relationship to:
King John of England
36 13th Cousin, 17th Cousin of First Lady Lyndon B. Johnson 1963-1969 Relationship to:
King John of England
37 7th Cousin Richard M. Nixon 1969-1974 Relationship to:
King John of England
38 8th Cousin, 13th Cousin of First Lady Gerald Ford 1974-1977 Relationship to:
King John of England
39 14th Cousin Jimmy Carter 1977-1981 Relationship to:
King John of England
40 15th Cousin, 9th Cousin of First Lady Ronald Reagan 1981-1989 Relationship to:
King John of England
41 9th Cousin, 9th Cousin of 1st Lady George Bush 1989-1993 Relationship to:
King John of England
42 19th Cousin William J. Clinton 1993-2001 Relationship to:
King John of England
43 10th Cousin George W. Bush 2001-2009 Relationship to:
King John of England
44 11th Cousin Barack Hussein Obama 2009-2015 Relationship to:
King John of England

–=–

President Obama is:

–=–

–=–

Again, special thanks and credit to Mr. Dowling long before that little bloodline 12 year old girl made international news.

 

Now go about your day…

Nothing to see here…

.

–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Monday, January 13th, 2014

Leave a comment

25 Comments

  1. Adrian

     /  January 13, 2014

    Clint this is to much of a fairy tale.There are too many crooks on the net now days trying to sell their crap for a buck.
    I may say that most of them are jew related.
    This royal bloodline is crap.

    Reply
    • Before I accuse you of fallacy and lack of evidence with responsibility for the burden of proof for your contrary “opinion”, please explain how the above information is a fairy tail by providing evidence based rhetoric?

      Reply
  2. Adrian

     /  January 15, 2014

    The people who provided that info have no proof either.People have changed their names
    over the history.
    Genealogy today is based on fraud.Most of today written history is counterfeit.
    Only a DNA test will prove the truth.

    Reply
  3. thomas russo

     /  January 20, 2014

    Beleive what you want, as for myself I am related to King John and a whole bunch of other Plantagents but in my family tree only George Bush, Carter and Taft share the same grand parent and that means absolutley nothing at least to me, its all coffee table talk. To get a better understand read Volume 1 of the United States code paying close attent to Titles 1-4 within

    Reply
    • To repeat…

      “It should be noted that Americans whose ancestors came from continental Europe in the colonial period and the 19th Century are unlikely to easily delineate descent from Charlemagne in their background. There was a separation of classes in Europe and the blood of the rulers seldom flowed legitimately into the blood of the nobility and commoners…”

      –Jewels of the Crown – “A newsletter of the Order of the Crown of Charlemagne in the United States of America”

      Blood and relation are two separate things.

      Reply
      • thomas russo

         /  January 20, 2014

        So what and what is the point?, the Constitution “for the United States” and the Constitution “of the United States” are two seperate documents and can be found in Volume 1 United States Code which is inclusive of Titles 1-4 and Title 5 sections 101-5949, paying close attention to 1-4 you will find the answer along with your Originial state bordered Constitution. Ohio’s is the 1803 and inforce while the 1851 deals only with the Constitution “of the United States” now you have to figure the rest out.

        Reply
        • Oh… I see. You are a patriot parrot.

          Thanks but no thanks.

          Reply
          • thomas russo

             /  January 22, 2014

            Patriot parrot, most whom can not establish what one wants to address always draw upon some slanderous terms to show they are in want of reality and are shown to be Psychopaths, and I excuse ones ignorance to all whom want to remain stupid and bid them good day. But, yet should one be in want of knowledge I would suggest one read Volume 1 United States Code Titles 1-4 and draw upon the Organic Laws in the order the foundation was set, which draws upon the position of a free inhabitant, the queen in the game not the pawn.

            Reply
        • (Negative blood, especially RH Negative, has a higher copper content then positive iron blood, which is where ‘Blue blood’ actually comes from. Bush was awarded the Presidency in ’04 because he had more ‘blue blood’ then Gore.)

          recorded since 1834 for noble birth or descent; it is also known as a translation of the Spanish phrase sangre azul, which described the Spanish royal family and other high nobility who claimed to be of Visigothic descent,[12] in contrast to the Moors. The idiom originates from ancient and medieval societies of Europe and distinguishes an upper class(whose superficial veins appeared blue through their untanned skin) from a working class of the time. The latter consisted mainly of agricultural peasants who spent most of their time working outdoors and thus had tanned skin, through which superficial veins appear less prominently. The genesis of the blue blood concept: It was the Spaniards who gave the world the notion that an aristocrat’s blood is not red but blue. The Spanish nobility started taking shape around the ninth century in classic military fashion, occupying land as warriors on horseback. They were to continue the process for more than five hundred years, clawing back sections of the peninsula from its Moorish occupiers, and a nobleman demonstrated his pedigree by holding up his sword arm to display the filigree of blue-blooded veins beneath his pale skin—proof that his birth had not been contaminated by the dark-skinned enemy.

          Reply
      • thomas russo

         /  January 25, 2014

        Spooner made a mistake, by the way read all of his stuff, real good, however he missed the Organic Law which is Volume 1 United States Code which includes Titles 1-4 also Title 5 in same book however the discussion is Titles 1-4 which everyone in most part is missing the whole of the subject, in that is the point even though some may not think so, for it is the LAW not Legal ease of legislative acts. So look at it as one it includes Title 1 (Declaration of Independence) first congressional delegates, then Title 2 (Articles of Confederation) second congressional delegates, then Title 3 (Northwest Ordinance) third congressional delegates at which point the thirteen colonies ceded land to the United States of America to pay off the dept of the Revolution which now becomes the Northwest Territory, but there are stipulations within said territory in order for them to become Constituted states “for the United States” at this point do not get confused with the Constitution “of the United States” that is Title 4 and that is the governing body of the territory of the United States of America which is land owned by it (Bureau of Land Management maps). Take as an example Ohio which was part of the Northwest Territory until it has X amount of free inhabitants then it moved to Ratify the Articles of Confederation at Title 2 and establish a Bordered Constitution which was in 1803 and became part of the first Union the perpetual one not the one in Title 4 which is restricted to what is owned by the United States of America (Bureau of Land Management Maps), but after Ohio establishe it 1803 Bordered Constitution the land was no longer part of the Northwest Ordinance with one exception and that is Wayne National Forrest (Bureau of Land management maps) along with Ports, Forts and needfull building within those areas, so what does this all mean?, well the Ohio general assemply its state citizens could no longer legislate upon land not owned by the United States of America, but had to deal with Title 4 the Constitution “of the United States” so in order for it to deal it had to go to the 1851 Ohio Constitution by resolution and leaving the 1803 one in force for Article IV free inhabitants with all the privileges and immunities of state citizens without being one as Ratified by the Articles of Confederation in Title 2 of the perpetual Union. Now, the 1851 Ohio Constitution deals with the Constitution “of the United States” and its United States Code but is allowed to Revise it without over shaddowing it through its Revised Code which applies to anything created by congressional delegated in Article 1 section 8, where anything congress creates congress controls, so what did congress create?, once you get that part accross you have the subject of its creations in your hand to handle and its all fiction, for Law creates fiction, fiction does not create law.

        Reply
  4. thomas russo

     /  January 20, 2014

    King John could not even write his own name

    Reply
  5. Adrian

     /  January 23, 2014

    The fact of the matter is that those who are controlling America today are well organized
    as bandits at a Global scale.
    We as American people are divided and scattered in the wind.
    We need to organize and be united to act as one.
    We have the power,we need to find the way.
    Too much talk too little action.

    Reply
    • thomas russo

       /  January 23, 2014

      All this blood line stuff makes no difference even should one think that it does, it makes no difference who is what, the Constitution of the United States is defined as well as the Constitution for the United States, and it is something one has to get control of and set in their mind, but you have to put it together to make since and it starts in the Organic laws which is in Volume 1 of the United States Code in Titles 1-4 of that Volume, pay attention to the dates of entry this is the real foundation of everything, so take it apart in the order presented and pay attention to the dates of entry then get a copy of ones states Original bordered Constituton, then go to the Bureau of Land Management and take a look at what land is owned by the United States of America that is governed by the United States under the Constitution of the United States not the Constitution for the United States, and yes it sounds confusing, but I have no other method to make it more symple. But on land owned by the United States of American one needs a license if that helps.

      Reply
  6. Adrian

     /  January 25, 2014

    If any one wants to get a good grip on the word constitution I would suggest a good essay
    from the 19th century: The Constitution of No Authority by Lysander Spooner.
    What has happened to America is no coincidence.
    All that crap about United States today is all but nonsense.

    Reply
  7. Reblogged this on spiritwolf04.

    Reply
    • thomas russo

       /  January 27, 2014

      Dear Deceased; So called blood llines have no established right to anything with the exception of the right to natural law and the laws of nature make no preferance to anyone man or group of men/women together or seperate for all are subject to the laws of nature, no one or group may impose anything upon another.

      Reply
  8. Adrian

     /  January 26, 2014

    The land mass known as America belongs to Planet Earth.No one has any title on it.
    No one has a copy right on the word America.
    We the earthlings,people who are living on America have a right as users to be here.
    Is our duty to protect our right as users.
    The writtings of Lysander Spooner is an eye opener for all of us living today.
    A good maxim which once he used: what does not appear,does not exist.
    Think about it.

    Reply
    • thomas russo

       /  January 26, 2014

      Of course its all nonsense, and of course the word America and other such is all nonsense and that is the Point of Volume 1 United States Code and within Titles 1-4 of that Volume for the STATE OF__________ does not exist, however what man/woman sometimes refered to as people beleive what ever they create in their minds, in order to wash this out and become consious to what is, is in Volume 1. Peaces of paper like deeds, titles, certificates, registrations and the such are all fictions of the mind as well as money, but that is what the system wants one to beleive is that it is all real like public education (brain washing) as well there is no President of the United States of America for that alleged office is vacant and its in Titles 1-4, Spooner just missed it, or posably did not read it, or have it in mind, for he never even mentions it. For example Police have absolutley NO AUTHORITY outside the limits of the United States meaning the territory there in as defined in Their Codes and all their codes apply to them and no one outside, so should one sport a license plate the nexus is complete by assumption along with drivers license (in commerce) but all the traveling in commerce is in what is called a zone of fiction employed by a map a political map, you know that street/road map one has to view or some g.p.s. device, its all fiction created by law. All these people getting a so called right to carry license never ever read the code section that created it for it is restricted to Territory owned by the United States of America the District of Columbia and its employees so anyone whom is assumed to be said United States citizen but does not live there is actually now part of Title 18 U.S.C. for that Title is Voluntary and that is another situation which most do not understand for none of those codes apply to anyone outside the United States District of Criminals by deceptions. Now if you take Title 5 of Volume 1 that is manditory for employees of the District of Columbia under Civil Law and revised codes. The one thing they do not want to do is open Pandoras Box and that is what is in Volume 1 along with ones state Original Bordered Constitution and Ratification of the Articles of Confederation. There also is a Phylosophy called “As If” you can find it on line, for that is repugnant to an Original bordered Constitution also part of Pandoras Box, so they the municipal end works “as if ” it is in the United States. Have fun you will get it.

      Reply
  9. It is interesting how many that murdered, raped, participated in child pedophilia, marrying many women, men and children, human trafficked broke the very laws they created,now want to throw around the laws, Constitution, USC codes and etc.

    Reply
  10. If the Presidents are related by blood then this article has to be discussing about the controllers and handlers of the so call Presidents instead of the actual person that is allegely holding the office. This is a major problem in the United States due to the fight that I am fighting them for human trafficking, child pedophilia and sexual assaults of my children by those in the entertainment and politicial realm, the rape of my mother, abuse and murder of my great grandmother, abuse of my grandmother, the fact that Elizabeth and her crew stole my body as a child, the Jacksons and their false claim of ownership of people and many more crimes against humanity. The fact the government takes advantage of the people that do not know the laws is the problem in this country.

    Reply
  11. Manny Clay

     /  July 13, 2014

    Hello to all, and a thank you for providing this forum. I am awakened to what you write about having gone to jail (only for a day) to prove the validity of what you state. I had looked at A4V and Redemption in Law process several years ago but came to conclusion that I do not own the NAME that the papal Caesar ‘offered’ me and therefore to seek ownership or controlling use of it would amount to criminal trespass as it is his creation and property, not mine. The Bible does have several examples of name renunciation/change in OT and NT, even stating that it was God/Christ that was the giver of this New Name.

    Perhaps I overlooked it in the post but I failed to see what lies at the bottom of all of the presidents tracing their lineage back to John. From what I can gather it is John’s agreement with Pope Innocent to hand over Britain and Ireland to him and pay a yearly lease for its use in exchange for pardon of all his sins and eternal felicity in the hereafter. Please search “Pope Innocent, King John agreement.” The Magna Carter was apparently subsequent to this agreement, and the Pope made that agreement with the barons null and void as John no longer held the right or authority as sovereign to do what he did. The compact between pope and king was binding on or extended to all of his successors and assigns, that is, his descendants. I believe this is why all presidents come from his root. this is why I turned in my voters registration card and no longer participate in the process. In fact, Gore, Quayle, Cheney, Romney, and Biden are also related to King John. The odds of this occurring are just about a statistical impossibility — 1 in 1 BILLION! We are not presently colonies of Her Majesties Government as some allege, although that is certainly understandable when you closely read the 1783 Treaty of Paris. Rather, it seems we are property of the present Pope. Please search “words of the beast.”

    Now for something that may fall outside this post but is a natural progression attested to by historical fact. The papacy or beast was totally taken over by the SS, that is the Synagogue of Satan, also known as MYSTERY BABYLON THE GREAT in the 50’s with the ‘election’ of Roncalli, an Ashkenazi and highly placed Freemason who took the NAME John XXIII. The former John XXIII was an antipope. Read his agnostic “The Precious Blood of Jesus”, and the tribe honoring “Nostra Aetate.” All popes subsequent to him have also been of his stripe and lineage. John Paul I, though elected was afterward murdered just 33 days into his pontificate for investigating the Vatican Bank. His organs were removed so no autopsy was performed. The Hidden Hand continues to rule and will until she is with violence thrown down by the kings who receive authority one hour with the beast. Then the mark, the name, the number and the image will no longer be hiding in plain sight but will be in your face to be worshipped under pain of death.

    Reply
  1. How All Presidents Are Related To King John |
  2. Revisionist History #8; Kissing Cousins ~ All Presidents Related by Blood | TABU ~ Towards A Better Understanding

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,297 other followers

%d bloggers like this: