Recent Interviews


Don’t get called for much anymore, but here’s the latest few…

#1 & 2. Sholly visits Clint:

–=–

–=–

#3 On Republic with Camile, speaking about supreme court decision on vaccines and new fake foods, lab-grown meat, etc. (Very bad connection and sound quality here, sorry.)

https://spingolaspeaks.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/2019-09-14-spingola.mp3

Camile’s work and email:
👉 steemit.com/@camille1234
🖥 youtube.com/channel/UC_m1HUpNNfkb3x2cv9RrHjQ

.

Clint richard-son (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
Monday, September 30th, 2019

Advertisements

Zionist Israeli Jews Have Become The New Nazi Party


A short introduction behind the reason for this post and its title:

I found a comment today from someone trying to view my blog from their work. It said simply: my company’s proxy blocks the “realitybloger” because of “intolerence”.

So my blog is not tolerated because I’m intolerant, yet those not tolerating me and this blog remain tolerable despite their intolerance of me? Isn’t this an oxymoron? Is not censorship an act of intolerance? Or has the meaning of “free speech” been post-modernly redefined as revocable tolerated speech?

The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and other Zionist lobby strongholds in America and beyond have been causing such fallacious designations and defamations of my name and works for at least 8 years now. It works, is working, and yet, since it’s never happened to most goyim stuck in the social oblivion clickbait of Facebook puppy and kitten pics and vids, most seem to believe it’s not actually happening, convinced that this veiled whitewash of alternative writers and wiping away of truth in reporting masked as an anti-hate claptrap is just normal. It was eight years ago that just one single phone call from the ADL to my spineless local 630AM talkshow programing director got me restricted, booted, and banned from that station with prejudice, blanketing me as “antisemite” and “holocaust denier,” all because I promoted and quoted on air the documentary film “Defamation”, made by an Israeli Jew, that was a major critique of Abe Foxman and the ADL, as well as its excellently documented reveal of the institutionalized brainwashing-tourism that is being done to otherwise innocent children around the world, an induction into pointless, Zionist hatred for all other races, especially “white” people. They have certainly defamed me and shut me down, have gotten me censored again and again, and continuously taint my good name… and yet I’m apparently the intolerable one? What’s more, this intolerable act of censorship somehow passes as neo-social justice instead of unlawful slander.

Here’s that film, well worth the watch, for those that wish to see the brainwashing cult in action, destroying the innocence of children around the world:

Defamation

This inculturation of hate is happening to all children, even yours.
It’s called public education.

“Her family emigrated from Russia in the 19th century
because of the strong Zionist ideology.
The first Zionists came to Israel, or Palestine as it was then,
because they thought IT WAS THE ONLY (i.e. FINAL) SOLUTION TO ANTI-SEMITISM.”

–=–

And so I tell you, the reader, once again, the only way my blog will be seen is if you personally share it, recopy it, email it, pass it on, play it forward, without any permission needed by me. Otherwise, this Zionist thought-police lobbyist regime wins. That said, I dedicate this particular blog entry to one Abe Foxman, that rat-bastard behind it all at the ADL, because Abe, once you cause a man to have and to hold nothing to lose, once you’ve fallaciously done what you’ve done to a man, you’ve made an enemy far greater than what he ever might have been when those possessions and misguided beliefs in the fairness and opportunities ahead of him held him back, and bided his tongue. Perhaps I should thank you for this sense of infamous freedom?

The only real difference between myself and Abe, ironically, is that I don’t hate this man, possessing only pity and sadness for him. I certainly don’t have the power to censor him or his organizations as they do mine own, a fact that tells you exactly who controls the mainstream outlets of news and entertainment media and supposed internet freedom. I can’t imagine living my life in such deceit and treachery to all “races” and “ethnicities” but my own eugenic cult, while at the same time having to constantly trick and deceive all of us common goyim of your feigned friendship, as if you’re our protector instead of our infiltrator.

But the truth is, without anti-semitism, there is no semitism. It’s not a real thing. Think about it, I’ve personally never heard the term semitism used without the prefix “anti” in front of it. So where do I find the semite or those acting as semites, remembering that semite is a term of science defined as Arab and other “races” (bloodlines), including the ancient (not modern) Hebrews, and that the term “Jew” was added to that description of semite quite recently for political purposes. Not once have I heard the Jewish race referred to as the semites. Not once have I ever heard a “Jew” referred to as a semite. Semitic language? Yes. But a race? No. Doesn’t exist. Go ahead. Look it up. I’ll wait. Any dictionary will do, or at lease any one not edited by Zionists.

You see, the sociopath must have enemies to have existence, to be recognized as that which is the victim of the enemies it pretends. When a group’s self-identity relies solely on promoting anti-semitism, that is, hatred of its own group, as the basis for its rallying cry and social/political identity, then that ethnic (language-based) groups’ Zionist promoters must therefore strive to keep that hate alive, even when it can’t be found in most places and common people. It must propagandize and promote its own self-hatred. So they create it. They attack themselves and blame it on their “enemies,” which ironically are the actual Arab semites, that is, non-Jews.

I speak Hebrew therefore I am a semite? By that logic, anyone in the world from any race or background can call themselves a semite! And so even the legitimacy of actual and accepted scientific classification is destroyed by these Zionist sociopaths.

The Anti-Defamation League does the opposite of its clever title, seeking out or creating false-flag anti-semitism wherever it can. It does this because Zionist leaders know that without at least the perception of hatred from all other peoples, the Jew has no identity, no ground to stand on, no reason to exist in title, and certainly no desire or perceived need to unite as a “Jewish” people (i.e. state). This is called inversion, the oldest trick in the book, and one often portrayed as that used by the Devil itself. And with today’s media technologies and reach, it’s working very well.

But what use is media without putting on a show?

–=–

Palestinians arrest al-Qaeda ‘poseurs’

The Palestinian Authority arrested a group of collaborators who confessed they were WORKING FOR ISRAELposing as al-Qaeda operatives in the Palestinian territories,” said the official, on condition of anonymity.

He said the alleged collaborators sought to “discredit the Palestinian people, justify every Israeli crime and provide reasons to carry out a new (military) aggression in the Gaza Strip.

 The arrests come two days after Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon charged al-Qaeda militants were operating in Gaza and in Lebanon.

It was considered a surprise because the Gaza Strip is virtually sealed off by Israeli troops. The hardline Israeli leader also charged other members of the terror group were cooperating with Lebanon’s Shi’ite militia Hizbollah.”

Meanwhile, Israeli troops backed by tanks and helicopter gunships swept into the Bureij refugee camp in the Gaza Strip yesterday, sparking a gun battle and killing 10 people, Palestinian witnesses and medics said.

Army officials said the troops had met fierce resistance in the three-hour pre-dawn incursion, which it said was intended to root out militants responsible for attacks on troops in Gaza in a more than two-year Palestinian uprising for independence.

Source: https://www.smh.com.au/world/middle-east/palestinians-arrest-al-qaeda-poseurs-20021208-gdfxof.html

–=–

Rinse, wash, repeat.

Funny, Hitler and the Nazi party was accused of using false flag terror too!

In other words, the Israeli Mossad actively participates in practices of severe, violent, and often deadly defamation of their political and religious enemies, by first posing as their own enemy so that government and military crimes may continue unwarranted, as a pretended response. Problem, reaction, solution. They must create the perception of a public enemy when one is not attacking them legitimately. Nothing new, really, but certainly a trick that has been overplayed and reported on many times. So many times, in fact, that a US military intelligence gathering center reported on the day before September 11, 2001 about the Mossad:

Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target U.S. forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act.” —School of Advanced Military Studies (SAMS) report, about the the Israeli intelligence service MOSSAD, as reported in the Washington Post on September 10, 2001.

–=–

The point is that the purpose of the Anti-Defamation League is not to prevent defamation but to spread it, for the purposes of crushing dissenting views, and most importantly, the Truth about Zionism, the modern majority of secular-atheist Jews, Israel, and Palestine. And it will stop at nothing to fulfill its mission. It’s the protector of immorality.

Women’s March Leader Slams Jewish Group ADL, Claims It ‘Constantly Attacks Black People’

Tamika Mallory bashed the group and called her followers to boycott Starbucks after the coffee giant included ADL in its anti-bias training.

A Women’s March leader mired in controversy because of her association with the virulently anti-Semitic Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan has attacked Starbucks for including the Anti-Defamation League among its advisers on bias.

Tamika Mallory in a tweet Tuesday evening accused the Jewish group of “constantly attacking black and brown people.”

Source: https://www.haaretz.com/us-news/women-s-march-leader-slams-starbucks-for-including-adl-in-training-1.6012252

–=–

Of course, Star-bucks (codename: dollars for Israel) is often shown to be one of the greatest contributors to the “state” of Israel, appearing often on boycott lists, and so this ADL infiltration should not at all be a surprise to anyone not bamboozled already by the brainwashing effect of “non-bias” education in public schools, media, and government policy.

For more information on how Zionist groups promoting hate and prejudice have infiltrated every platform and level (grade) of the American education system, creating the “anti-bias” or what I call virtual book-burning curriculum and lesson-plans to be taught through the internationally borne Common Core, including deep inside the government and its military classrooms, please see my sourced essays here:

United States And Its Military Now Rotten To The CORE: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2013/10/21/united-states-and-its-military-now-rotten-to-the-core/

CORE: Making Children Stupider Around The World: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2013/08/29/core-making-children-stupider-around-the-world/

–=–

Finally, when it was publicly found out that recent, multiple bomb-threats being foisted upon Jewish schools and other institutions were actually the work of an Israeli duel-citizen in the United States, thus effectively ruining the ability of the ADL and other powerful Jewish lobbies and news outlets to use those threats of violence against them as ammunition and for influencing policy-changes and other Zionist infiltrations based on false flag hate crimes, good old Abe was there to save the day and still managed to spin the facts to the benefit of international Zionism. Caught red-handed in this clandestine action, one of many documented incidences of Israeli Jews and Mossad agents posing as non-jews and even Arabs and middle-eastern Arab-based terrorist members, they blame it all on a brain tumor. LOL!

Watch the master Zionist propagandist Foxman at work playing the victim instead of the infiltrator…

“I’ve known Donald Trump for 35 years.”

The message before the public found out the terrorist was an Israeli Jew?
Anti-semitism is all around you. Have fear, but carry on and stay calm.
Without it, there’s no point in pretending to be a semite!

And after the truth is revealed?
Don’t jump to conclusions. Still have fear, carry on, and stay calm.
Anti-semitism is still all around you. They all still hate you, Jews.

No apologies for blaming a fictional “white supremesist” for what was in reality
the Zionist, Israeli-backed, false flag terrorism of a Jewish, Zionist supremesist.

The real question: What did Foxman and the ADL know
that we didn’t before the truth came out publicly?

–=–

Abe Foxman was National Director of the Anti-Defamation League from 1987 to 2015, and is currently the League’s National Director Emeritus. In March 2016, he became head of the Center for the Study of Anti-Semitism at the Museum of Jewish Heritage in New York City. Will the real source of hatred, racial disparity, and defamation please stand up?

That’s your queue, Abe!

And now, on with the show…

–=–

Zionist Israeli Jews Have Become The New Nazi Party

Irony, especially when mixed with open, blatant hypocrisy, sometimes presents itself in strange ways as the events of history unfold so as to completely destroy the delusional foundational argument for such hypocritical groups to exist in the first place. So what happens when the supposed victim of terror can no longer hide the fact that it’s the actual, original terrorist?

If there is one thing Israel cries out for more than any other thing as its rallying cry, it’s the continued, uninterrupted, internationally (illegitimately) recognized and therefore secularly (legally) protected existence of the artificial, legal “state” of its Zionist self. But make no mistake, what has been formed from that foundational mold based on pretended victimhood and legitimate international exile is a bordered cesspool of absolute nepotism, despotism, hatred, and xenophobia. Zionist Elysium. What Israel has become is the most racist, eugenic-oriented, political model in the world, matching even its own historical narratives of that of its most demonized tormentors.

I urge you to view each of these videos before you can’t anymore, so as to understand the true nature behind the lie of the eternally victimized “Jew”. The parallels to Nazi Germany cannot be understated…

“It’s not too late. Start rounding up the infiltrators.
We don’t need to wait for the Supreme Court…”

“We’re (Jews are) racist because we want to preserve
our lives and our sanity. So I’m proud to be racist.
And it’s our right to be racist.”

“You (black Africans) should all be in camps,
not among us (jews) in the city.”

“Israel has vowed to remove some 38,000 illegal immigrants within months,
offering to pay them to leave.”

“More than 1,000 crossed the border into Israel each month,
until the Israeli army sealed the route with a fence in 2013.”

“If they grant me (deputy prime minister) all the tools
without exception, in less than a year, not a
single infiltrator will remain in the state of Israel.”

“Just a day after announcing a UN deal that would
resettle (TRANSFER) asylum seekers in Western countries like Canada,
Israel’s prime minister has just now cancelled the agreement altogether.”

“…his (the prime minister’s) Education Minister said the agreement
would allow Israel to become in his words an ‘infiltrators” paradise
using the word that many (Jews) here use for the asylum seekers.”

“What you see here along the Egyptian border is part of a bigger plan
by Israel to surround its entire territory with a high-tech fence.”

“The formidable barrier, which was completed in 2013,
all but choked off the flow of people (infiltrators, illegals, non-Jews)…
The aim of the project is to keep out what Benjamin Netanyahu,
the country’s right wing leader, calls the beasts in the 
neighborhood.”

–=–

So let us be clear, this is exactly what happened in Germany through the 1930’s and leading up to World War II, from the wall being built to the degradation of all “infiltrating” races and conditions. Same pig, different lipstick. In other words, Israel is emulating and practicing the policies and actions of Hitler and the Nazi party, the very demon they use as their excuse to “exist” as a Jewish state.

Inversely, we must view Zionist lobbies like the ADL in America and other nations, to see what they promote outside of Israel, which is the complete opposite of what they do. As Israel builds its fences and walls, it promotes the opposite for all other nations, open borders for all, not the least of all for the United States. And while in America these Jewish, Zionist lobbies demonize the United States for its porous but closed borders toward illegals from Central and South America, at the same time it hypocritically is finishing its own fences and walls to secure the borders of its illegitimately conquered eugenic-based territory, treating the Palestinians whose homes they “settled” (openly stole) as if they are the illegal ones, pretending Palestine somehow doesn’t really exist anymore, just as that part of Mexico that is now the United States somehow doesn’t exist anymore.

At the same time, Zionist lobbies like AIPAC and the ADL openly cheer, propagandize, and write policy for open boarders and promote citizenship for illegal occupiers, or what in its own Israeli state it calls as “infiltrators.”

According to its own website, the ADL “welcomes Administration and bipartisan Congressional support for reform that includes earned legalization with a path to citizenship for unauthorized immigrants already living in the United States, and states that US policymakers should support a pathway to earned citizenship for their neighbors who want nothing more than to come out of the shadows, to contribute to society, and to follow the rules without fear of deportation and separation from their loved ones.

Can the inversion be any thicker? In short, Israel has infiltrated American policy-making through the ADL and AIPAC, and as I have reported previously, is the creator of many policies and educational standards in US schools and universities, and even the military, not the least of which is its “holocaust education” program, the very program criticized in the movie Defamation. This hypocrisy is glaringly ridiculous even for the staunch supporter of Israel and the modern, so-called secular, Zionist Jew, the poor victims of racism and hatred. LOL! In truth, the international Zionists know two things for sure, that open boarders will destroy nations, including America, and that only by closing their own border can the “jewish” Zionist “state” be protected from “infiltrators” that refuse to adopt to Jewish culture, a Talmudic-based civil law, and of course a social-sanctioned antichrist, anti-Muslim religion.

But what is far less known to the public at large and seldom spoken about, due to the same fear and false-stigma of being called anti-semite or a holocaust denier, is the infamous Transfer Agreement. It was the actual “final solution” to the same exact “problem” happening in Israel, except in Germany it was called the “Jewish problem” instead of the “African, Black, Christian, or Muslim problem.” Hitler and the National Socialists, together in intention with the International Zionist Congress, formed an agreement to export (transfer) the Jews from Germany and into Palestine in order to begin the formation of a new “state” for exported Jews to populate. Seriously, just where do you think all the “Jews” came from to populate the new “state” of Israel? The problem was that those “Jews” in Germany preferentially identified themselves as Germans, not as Zionists Jews. Most knew that any political state for Jews would be against the Torah, or in other words, not built according to God’s Word. And so they had to be threatened and made afraid to stay in Germany, and yes, were even offered money to “transfer” to Palestine, lest this Zionist plot die before it started. Here again, we find the same thing happening in Israel today, where “Jews” internationally are paid to “transfer” to Israel.

–=–

Even 1% Jewish? Then go to Israel for Free, no Joke!

When my friend Dave told me about Birth Right a few years ago, I thought it sounded too good to be true. A 10 day free trip to Israel with airfare, hotels, and food all completely paid for?..No jew I knew would front that bill. Well, it was true, and a couple years back, just for being Jewish, I got to on one of the most fun, interesting and enlightening trips of my whole life… Birth Right is sponsored by Israel itself as well as some extremely wealthy Jews with the goal of building Jewish pride and support for the state of Israel. Of course there is a little brainwashing attempted, but its only fair, and it wasn´t that bad. They just talked about how being Jewish is more of a unique heritage than a religious devotion and how it’s important to preserve that heritage.

Source: http://www.theworldorbust.com/even-1-jewish-then-go-to-israel-for-free-no-joke/

–=–

Iran’s Jews reject cash offer to move to Israel

· Expats offer families £30,000 to emigrate
· Our identity is not for sale, say community leaders

Source: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2007/jul/12/israel.iran

–=–

ALIYAH: Your journey back to Israel begins here.

The Jewish Agency for Israel helps Jews take greater ownership over their stories in a very special way: we bring them home. All Jews, no matter where they were born, are Israeli citizens by right. If you’ve ever considered making the move to Israel, let us light the way.

Source: https://www.jewishagency.org/aliyah/

–=–

Think about that for a moment… imagine a communist Chinese Agency that specialized in paying US citizens to expatriate to China? The difference? When you move to Israel, for some completely insane reason, this is one of the few countries that the United States allows duel-citizenship with. Duel-citizenship. Allegiance to two foreign nations from each other? But it’s ok, we are friends of Israel. No problem. Why not just call duel Israeli citizenship with the US as what it is, a spy ring for Israel without sanction or consequence?

Just to be clear, as some in the alternative, patriot mythos out there believe there is a tangible difference between a national of and a citizen of the United States, let’s read government’s opinion instead:

Section 101(a)(22) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) states that “the term ‘national of the United States’ means (A) a citizen of the United States, or (B) a person who, though not a citizen of the United States, owes permanent allegiance to the United States.Therefore, U.S. citizens are also U.S. nationals. Non-citizen nationality status refers only individuals who were born either in American Samoa or on Swains Island to parents who are not citizens of the United States. The concept of dual nationality means that a person is a national of two countries at the same time. Each country has its own nationality laws based on its own policy. Persons may have dual nationality by automatic operation of different laws rather than by choice. For example, a child born in a foreign country to U.S. national parents may be both a U.S. national and a national of the country of birth. Or, an individual having one nationality at birth may naturalize at a later date in another country and become a dual national…

Dual nationals owe allegiance to both the United States and the foreign country. They are required to obey the laws of both countries, and either country has the right to enforce its laws. It is important to note the problems attendant to dual nationality. Claims of other countries upon U.S. dual-nationals often place them in situations where their obligations to one country are in conflict with the laws of the other. In addition, their dual nationality may hamper efforts of the U.S. Government to provide consular protection to them when they are abroad, especially when they are in the country of their second nationality.

Source: https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/legal/travel-legal-considerations/Advice-about-Possible-Loss-of-US-Nationality-Dual-Nationality/Dual-Nationality.html

–=–

So, in other words, in dealing with a Jew, the only thing that has changed is that now the Jew has a legal citizenship to a Jewish “state” instead of just being a nomadic citizen infiltrator into all other states, but their allegiance to “Israel” as a people before legal incorporation into a state hasn’t changed at all. The Jewish civil law (Talmud) hasn’t changed. What they do for or to America they do for Israel, as we’ve heard it said many times before.

And just whose land and home will these paid, imported “Jews” from other countries move into? We all know the answer. The term”settlement” is code for the militarily-protected theft of Palestinian/Arab (that is, actual semite) land and property.

So as to understand that the exact same intention of the Nazi (National Socialist) Party in Germany at the time of this Transfer Agreement and world war is today the same exact popular opinion of so-called Israeli Jews today, we must understand what really happened to all those Jews that were an unwelcome burden on the finally recovered, German economy after its social and economic destruction from World War I. The following is an excerpt from “The Jewish Declaration of War on Nazi Germany – The Economic Boycott of 1933”, from The Barnes Review, by M. Raphael Johnson, Ph.D…

–=–

To the Zionist leaders, Hitler’s assumption of power held out the possibility of a flow of Jewish immigrants to Palestine. Previously,the majority of German Jews, who identified themselves as Germans, had little sympathy with the Zionist cause of promoting the ingathering of world Jewry to Palestine. But the Zionists saw that only the anti-Semitic Hitler was likely to push the anti-Zionist German Jews into the arms of Zionism.

For all the modern-day wailing by worldwide supporters of Israel (not to mention the Israelis themselves) about “the Holocaust”, they neglect to mention that making the situation in Germany as uncomfortable for the Jews as possiblein cooperation with German National Socialismwas part of the plan.

Note to readers of this article who can also read German: a booklet discussing the emigration of Jews from Third Reich Germany, and the Transfer Agreement that facilitated their emigration, may be found here!

This was the genesis of the so-called Transfer Agreement, the agreement between Zionist Jews and the National Socialist government to transfer German Jewry to Palestine.

According to Jewish historian Walter Laqueur and many others, German Jews were far from convinced that immigration to Palestine was the answer. Furthermore, although the majority of German Jews refused to consider the Zionists as their political leaders, it is clear that Hitler protected and cooperated with the Zionists for the purposes of implementing the final solution: the mass transfer of Jews to the Middle East.

Edwin Black, in his massive tome The Transfer Agreement (Macmillan, 1984), stated that although most Jews did not want to flee to Palestine at all, due to the Zionist movement’s influence within Nazi Germany a Jew’s best chance of getting out of Germany was by emigrating to Palestine. In other words, the Transfer Agreement itself mandated that Jewish capital (money) could only go to Palestine (nowhere else).

Thus, according to the Zionists, a Jew could leave Germany only if he went to the Levant (Eastern Mediterranean/Palestine area).

It was one thing for the Zionists to subvert the anti-Nazi boycott. Zionism needed to transfer out the capital of German Jews, and merchandise was the only available medium. But soon Zionist leaders understood that the success of the future Jewish Palestinian economy would be inextricably bound up with the survival of the Nazi economy. So the Zionist leadership was compelled to go further. The German economy would have to be safeguarded, stabilized, and if necessary reinforced. Hence, the Nazi party and the Zionist organizers shared a common stake in the recovery of Germany….

The result was the understanding that Zionism would have to ally itself with National Socialism, so that the German government would not impede the flow of Jewish capital out of the country.

It served the Zionist interests at the time that Jews be loud in their denunciations of German practices against the Jews to scare them into the Levant, but, on the other hand, Laqueur states that “The Zionists became motivated not to jeopardize the German economy or currency.” In other words, the Zionist leadership of the Jewish Diaspora was one of subterfuge and underhandedness, with only the advent of German hostility towards Jewry convincing the world’s Jews that immigration was the only escape.

The fact is that the ultimate establishment of the state of Israel was based on fraud. The Zionists did not represent anything more than a small minority of German Jews in 1933.

On the one hand, the Zionist fathers of Israel wanted loud denunciations of Germany’s “cruelties” to the world’s Jews while at the same time demanding moderation so that the National Socialist government would remain stable, financially and politically. Thus Zionism boycotted the (1933) boycott.

For all intents and purposes, the National Socialist government was the best thing to happen to Zionism in its history, for it “proved” to many Jews that Europeans were irredeemably anti-Jewish and that Palestine was the only answer: Zionism came to represent the overwhelming majority of Jews solely by trickery and cooperation with Adolf Hitler.

For the Zionists, both the denunciations of German policies towards Jews (to keep Jews frightened), plus the reinvigoration of the German economy (for the sake of final resettlement) was imperative for the Zionist movement. Ironically, today the Zionist leaders of Israel complain bitterly about the horrific and inhuman regime of the National Socialists. So the fraud continues.

–End Excerpt

–=–

If we are to be honest, today’s Israeli citizens calling themselves as “Jews” are about as ill-informed on their own actual history as are Americans, and are about as unfamiliar with their religion as American “Christians” are with the Bible and Its Law. Ignorance is the conquerer of people. Ignorance is the foundation of nations (goyim holding companies).

Now, one might suddenly find a deliciously ridiculous irony today while coming out from under the “final solution” holocaust brainwashing programs that the ADL and other lobbies have gotten placed into public schools and universities, and even the military. The truth is that today in the illegitimate Zionist state of “Israel” these so-called persecuted “jews” have essentially become the quintessential model of that old National Socialist party, as they openly seek to put black Africans in concentration camps and to transfer them violently from that part of Palestine they so violently stole almost 60 years ago, spreading like a disease through outright theft of Palestinian lands and through absolute military oppression. This irony and the hypocrisy that it serves is so thick you could cut it with a knife.

Meanwhile, this legal terrorism and theft is happening every day:

Now you know where 3 billion in US funds are going,
not to mention all the duped Christians that
financially donate to such causes without understanding.

“The Palestinians in the east didn’t want to be part of this new country that they had just been annexed into…”

“Palestinians in East Jerusalem don’t want Israeli citizenship. They were annexed against their will into a country that doesn’t recognize their full rights.”

Do you see?
This is exactly how the German “Jews” felt before
they were violently transferred against their will to Palestine.

English military forces did this, not Jews. Why?
To reclaim that land for the royal family.

“British duplicity, British double-dealing, went a long way to perpetuate the conflict in Palestine.”

“During the first world war, the British, the French, and the Russians had these secret plans to carve up the Ottoman Empire, because they believed that would balance out their imperial ambitions, but tough luck for the Turks, the Arabs, and anyone else who got in the way.”

“Certainly all the seeds were planted then in the sense that it was the British who promised the Arabs independence on the one hand, and a Jewish homeland on the other, and could not simply reconcile one with the other.”

“Baron Rothschild once said of the project, without me, the Zionists could have done nothing. But without the Zionists, my work would have been dead.”

Money, indeed, is the root of and behind all evil, the life-blood and currency of devils.
But propaganda like this makes money appear as God-given, its changers like God’s chosen.
Make no mistake, it was the changers of money (mammon) that conquered Palestine.

“19 stripes of orthodoxy…”

“About 3/4 of Israeli’s are Jewish, but most of these are SECULAR JEWS, NON-PRACTICING.”

“And the rabbis are almost like pop stars. They have their own following…”

–=–

Inversely, I attempted to make the point that the opposite oppression, theft, and military presence simply cannot be found when it comes to the enemies of the Zionist, Jewish “settlers”. In other words, the Palestinians have no military presence, have no soldiers to help them harm Jews, and have no governmental power to prevent absolute crimes against them.

For better understanding of the plight of the real semites, the Arab and black African population of former (rightful) Palestine, see my essay here: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2014/11/12/searching-for-palestinian-soldiers/

What is a non-practicing Jew? Is this an oxymoron, or a harsh, culturally xenophobic, hidden truth? Is Jewishness something that must be practiced, like Christianity, in order to be called a Jew? Apparently not. Essentially, Christians are supporting an almost completely secular, atheist state. Why? Because they are Jews? Non-practicing Jews. That’s would be like creating a Veterans center for non-serving vets. Vets that never served (practiced) in the military. That’s just not possible. I can’t be a non-practicing American, now can I? And that’s because Jewish identity isn’t real, its imaginary. It’s a front for persons participating in a cult of mass eugenics. It’s based on a lie, not race nor religion. The truth is that they don’t even know what they are!

The only way this question of what is a non-practicing Jew can be answered is to understand that Jews are not what you think they are nor what they think they are, and that as long as you continue to equate Jews as friendly to Christians and Christianity instead of as antichrist (opposed to Christianity except through trickery and deceit), then the trickery and international infiltration will continue, and Christians and US citizens will unwittingly continue to monetarily (in mammon) support that which is antichrist. To support Israel is to support crimes against humanity, theft of estates held for generations by innocent Arab families, and worst of all is to declare that a Jew (Ἰουδαῖοι) is not what the Bible warns us it is.

Please read the lexicon for Jew here: https://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?Strongs=G2453&t=KJV

Notice that in this Bible lexicon entry, the term “Jewish” refers to being “joined to nouns (names),” and that the word shem, as the tribe or generation of shem, means name. Jews are the tribe of those that are joined by names (nouns), just as the Royal families. They are one in the same, an artificial, incorporated “family” joined by meticulously charted, genealogically kept names. This term also refers to Jewishness (adjective) as being before the exile, whereas the Jew (noun) or Ἰουδαῖοι is descriptive of Jews after the exile, all the Israelites (cf. Wright in B. D. under the word )), the Jews… who live in foreign lands, among the Gentiles. In other words, these are not the same people. They are literally Jewish by name (noun), not by action, not by faith, not by race, not by spirituality… only through secular means. They are about as Jewish as the royal families are actually followers of Christ, that is, not at all. It’s all for show. Their identity and authority is based only upon their name (noun/flattering title). I cannot tell you how important this is to understand. 

For my full breakdown using only Jewish sources on what exactly is a Jew, please listen here: https://corporationnationradioarchives.wordpress.com/2017/10/22/red-pill-sunday-school-episode-6-october-22-2017/

You think this isn’t happening in America? You think the same Zionist influences aren’t perched right now in the highest places as your own burden? Think my censorship could have come from any other organized group? Think Christian prosperity preaching isn’t Zionism by another name (noun)? Think when you donate to Jewish organizations your money isn’t going to expand and steal the land and property that is anciently considered “Greater Israel” by Zionist Jews, another name for new Babylon, which is wholly against the New Testament of Christ?

Now, let’s be clear, the secular “Jews” (by name only) that inhabit Zionist Israel are acting exactly as they insistently and institutionally portray the German citizens as acting during the 1930’s and 40’s. And the biggest Zionist shill of them all is your acting president in the United States:


Trump signs declaration recognizing Israel’s sovereignty over disputed Golan Heights

Zionism to the extreme.
Presidential front-runner speaks to pro-Israel audience at AIPAC.

Christians United For Israel? Is this a practical joke? Yes!

Careful, this snake dresses as a sheep but is a ravenous, Zionist wolf.

Listen closely, for there is no mention of Christ here.
There is no support for Christianity here, except in trickery for its support of Israel.
There’s no reading from the New (Christian) Testament,
only the Old testament, the Jewish Law, the Torah is spoken of.
There are no shared values in any way.
The PM’s message is religious tolerance, the tolerance of Christians for antichrist Jews.
This is not what the Bible or Jesus Christ teaches or exemplifies.

“The first book of Samuel tells the story of Israel’s transition from a theocracy,
or state ruled by a religious leader, to a monarchy, or state ruled by a political leader.
Israel starts out as a nation of loosely affiliated tribes led by priests and religious heroes,
but it becomes a nation-state led by a centralized king.”

–=–

What the PM fails to mention here is that it’s the very fact that those tribes of what was true Israel (a people following God’s Law) were not legalized under secular law into a government, and that this fact is what made them Israelites, that they did not subscribe to the legalist law over God’s Law. In essence, Netanyahu admits here that the modern, legal, secular “state” of Israel has nothing to do with what was once called the Israelites – a people of God. Israel is not a theocracy, but a state ruled by a political leader, or in other words, modern Israel represents the state of Jews that are the fallen Israelites.

Israel… the only democracy in the middle east? That’s why America should protect it? LOL! You really need to be ignorant of history to believe that line of BS. Actually, the founding fathers of America where vehemently opposed to democracy in every way. But Democracy, according to its Marxist, communist, and Zionist promoters is the key to turning any nation towards socialism, next step communism. Communitarianism. I’ve posted these relevant quotes absolutely against democracy many times on this blog, and of course Plato in his five regimes essay lists democracy as the last step before tyranny. Yet always at the top of the regime cycle we find some religious, spiritually-based reason for an aristocracy to rule. Israel is not immune, obviously, from Plato’s views on the political degradation of all societies into democracy followed by anarchy (lawlessness) and despotism.

Israel (a corporation, an artificial person) apparently has the right to defend itself, but Palestinians do not. Why? Because Trump is obviously a Zionist. As Joe Biden publicly stated in his support for that illegitimate state, “you don’t have to be a Jew to be a Zionist.” Hey, if Israel is legitimate, why does it need a dictator like Trump and the American and English militaries to conquer and declare it as such? Why is it still labeled as an “occupied territory” according to the United Nations if Palestine doesn’t exist? The answer should be obvious. But oh, the propaganda…

And so we see these secularist, ADL brainwashed Jews of today, who base their whole identity on suffering, torment, hatred, and persecution, now committing the same eugenic, racially motivated crimes against humanity that they claim make themselves as self-identified Jews. And by this utter self-deceit and false historical narrative they are justifying the same exact behavior (if not worse) that they claim was put upon their ancestors. In fact, without that completely exaggerated Jewish holocaust history that somehow completely dismisses the Transfer Agreement, there would be no Jewish identity, and therefore no hostile Zionist takeover of the lands England has desired to re-aquire since the 1200’s when it lost its “Kingdom of Jerusalem” in the first place. Jews didn’t take the land, English forces did, as shown in the documentary above. And only then could Hitler’s and International Zionism’s final solution transfer agreement be fulfilled, the transfer of international Jewry as political pawns into Palestine as justification for the erection of the false, illegitimate, secular state of Israel. And yet here the Zionist-influenced Israeli Jews are doing the same exact thing, forcibly transferring out their unwanted black refugees because, as the Jews did in Germany and so many other countries they infiltrated, they are trying to preserve a now 6 decade old facade of culture based on lies and self-deceit, while demonizing all other cultures, colors, and creeds that seek the same thing.

For your consideration, this purposefully managed and directed migration of Jews was the genesis and ultimate goal of what was called the Transfer Agreement, an agreement between Zionist Jews and the National Socialist government to transfer German and German occupied Jewry to Palestine as the final solution.

–=–

Shoah Resource Center, The International School for Holocaust Studies

Extract from the Speech by Hitler, January 30, 1939:

 

…In connection with the Jewish question I have this to say: it is a shameful spectacle to see how the whole democratic world is oozing sympathy for the poor tormented Jewish people, but remains hard-hearted and obdurate when it comes to helping them which is surely, in view of its attitude, an obvious duty. The arguments that are brought up as an excuse for not helping them actually speak for us Germans and Italians.

For this is what they say:

1. We,” that is the democracies, “are not in a position to take in the Jews.” Yet in these empires there are not 10 people to the square kilometerWhile Germany, with her 135 inhabitants to the square kilometer, is supposed to have room for them!

2. They assure us: We cannot take them unless Germany is prepared to allow them a certain amount of capital to bring with them as immigrants.

For hundreds of years Germany was good enough to receive these elements, although they possessed nothing except infectious political and physical diseases. What they possess today, they have by a very large extent gained at the cost of the less astute German nation by the most reprehensible manipulations.

Today we are merely paying this people what it deserves. When the German nation was, thanks to the inflation instigated and carried through by Jews,deprived of the entire savings which it had accumulated in years of honest workwhen the rest of the world took away the German nation’s foreign investmentswhen we were divested of the whole of our colonial possessions, these philanthropic considerations evidently carried little noticeable weight with democratic statesmen.

Today I can only assure these gentlemen that, thanks to the brutal education with which the democracies favored us for fifteen years, we are completely hardened to all attacks of sentiment. After more than eight hundred thousand children of the nation had died of hunger and undernourishment at the close of the War, we witnessed almost one million head of milking cows being driven away from us in accordance with the cruel paragraphs of a dictate which the humane democratic apostles of the world forced upon us as a peace treaty. We witnessed over one million German prisoners of war being retained in confinement for no reason at all for a whole year after the War was ended. We witnessed over one and a half million Germans being torn away from all that they possessed in the territories lying on our frontiers, and being whipped out with practically only what they wore on their backs. We had to endure having millions of our fellow countrymen torn from us without their consent, and without their being afforded the slightest possibility of existence. I could supplement these examples with dozens of the most cruel kind. For this reason we ask to be spared all sentimental talk. The German nation does not wish its interests to be determined and controlled by any foreign nation. France to the French, England to the English, America to the Americans, and Germany to the GermansWe are resolved to prevent the settlement in our country of a strange people which was capable of snatching for itself all the leading positions in the land, and to oust it. For it is our will to educate our own nation for these leading positions. We have hundreds of thousands of very intelligent children of peasants and of the working classes. We shall have them educatedin fact we have already begun and we wish that one day they, and not the representatives of an alien race, may hold the leading positions in the State together with our educated classes. Above all, German culture, as its name alone shows, is German and not Jewish, and therefore its management and care will be entrusted to members of our own nation. If the rest of the world cries out with a hypocritical mien against this barbaric expulsion from Germany of such an irreplaceable and culturally eminently valuable element, we can only be astonished at the conclusions they draw from this situation. For how thankful they must be that we are releasing these precious apostles of culture, and placing them at the disposal of the rest of the world. In accordance with their own declarations they cannot find a single reason to excuse themselves for refusing to receive this most valuable race in their own countries. Nor can I see a reason why the members of this race should be imposed upon the German nation, while in the States, which are so enthusiastic about thesesplendid people,” their settlement should suddenly be refused with every imaginable excuse. I think that the sooner this problem is solved the better; for Europe cannot settle down until the Jewish question is cleared up. It may very well be possible that sooner or later an AGREEMENT on this problem may be reached in Europe, even between those nations which otherwise do not so easily come together.

The world has sufficient space for settlementsbut we must once and for all get rid of the opinion that the Jewish race was only created by God for the purpose of being in a certain percentage a parasite living on the body and the productive work of other nationsThe Jewish race will have to adapt itself to sound constructive activity as other nations do, or sooner or later it will succumb to a crisis of an inconceivable magnitude.

One thing I should like to say on this day which may be memorable for others as well as for us Germans: In the course of my life I have very often been a prophet, and have usually been ridiculed for it. During the time of my struggle for power it was in the first instance the Jewish race which only received my prophecies with laughter when I said that I would one day take over the leadership of the State, and with it that of the whole nation, and that I would then among many other things settle the Jewish problem. Their laughter was uproarious, but I think that for some time now they have been laughing on the other side of their face. Today I will once more be a prophet: If the international Jewish financiers in and outside Europe should succeed in plunging the nations once more into a world war, then the result will not be the Bolshevization of the earth, and thus the victory of Jewry, but the annihilation of the Jewish race in Europe!

The nations are no longer willing to die on the battlefield so that this unstable international race may profiteer from a war or satisfy its Old Testament vengeance. The Jewish watchwordWorkers of the world unitewill be conquered by a higher realization, namelyWorkers of all classes and of all nations, recognize your common enemy!”

Source: N.H. Baynes, ed., The Speeches of Adolf Hitler, I, London, 1942, pp. 737-741. See Document 4.

–=–

And so the Jews were transferred and reformed into a parasitic “state” called Israel. They did not take the advice of Hitler. They continue to parasite off of other nations, building massive spying technology corporations as a strange bedfellow and “unbreakable” partner of the United States. None of this makes sense, that is, unless you are a Zionist. Without the United States and its yearly billions of free money, grants, and investments, Israel would fall tomorrow. And that tells you that Zionism is not merely influencing but running the three branches of the government of United States!

Dare I state the truth here, that what these internationally organized Zionist Jews have today, both in corporate municipal Israel and elsewhere, equals what Hitler said long ago, that they have by a very large extent gained at the cost of the less astute German nation by the most reprehensible manipulations? Dare I quote Hitler here and be allowed to exist? Am I to be labeled as anti-semite or holocaust denier because I seek the truth and recognize that the real holocaust deniers are apparently manifesting themselves as the Zionist-brainwashed and inculturated Jews occupying Palestine and calling it “Israel” against even the Judaic orthodoxy of God’s Law and Will in every way possible? Shall I refer the reader again to Hitler’s words above, For how thankful they must be that we are releasing these precious apostles of culture, and placing them at the disposal of the rest of the world. In other words, they didn’t kill the Jews as the Zionist propagandists continuously declare in every media outlet and movie possible. They transferred them to Palestine, just as today the Zionist, Israeli Jews are making it extremely dangerous and uncomfortable for Black African refugees to remain in Israel, and either paying them or forcibly removing them into camps while they wait to be transferred out. It’s the same Zionist, Nazi transfer agreement, but inverted for the benefit of the Zionist “state” against its own “infiltrators”. Again, the irony is like a bad fart here. Is it not the worst kind of denial of one’s own political identity to ignore and then repeat every atrocious aspect and public opinion of what Hitler and the National Socialist Germany did to Jews through cooperation with the International Zionists? Do these “Jews” not see that they have literally and in every possible way manifested Hitler’s policies by their own actions against another race? 

You tell me, after reading the above statements and viewing those documentary clips… what is the difference between a Zionist influenced Israeli Jew and a National Socialist influenced German?

And riddle me this… what part of Hitler’s genuine concern for the fate of these international Jews is not clear? His warnings are unmistakable. He speaks of a select group of international Jewish (Zionist) financiers that were then and are now plunging us all into a new world war situation, in an effort towards the Bolshevization of the Earth, which can lead to only two outcomes… either the nations once again expel the Jews as a common enemy and refuse them nationhood to protect and preserve peace through the dismantling of Israel and expulsion of the international Zionists from their infiltration of national governments, or we suffer the same fate as the common Russian farm-based populace did under the Jewish-led Red Army, the real holocaust, leading to the murder of 10’s of millions of innocent men, women, and children under the banner of furthering Jewish, communist interests.

Claiming Jewishness is not a race, it is not a religion, it is not a family. It is a protectionist cult of antichrist behavior incompatible with all other nations, just as the Bible lexicons and concordances clearly define it. The average Jew, according to polls, is an atheist, and so pretending that Jewishness or being and Israeli citizen is a religious action or friendly towards Christianity in any way is blatantly ridiculous, a Zionist lie. It requires ignorance, or better yet, a Zionist bent and influence over the education systems of the world. Just look at these Jewish headlines:

–=–

Israel Among the Least Religious Countries in the World

Only 30% of Israelis say they are religious, survey finds;
Thailand is most religious country in the world and China is the least…
with just 30 percent saying they are religious and 65 percent
saying they are either not religious or convinced atheists

Source: https://www.haaretz.com/israel-china-among-least-religious-nations-1.5350737

–=–

Why So Many Jews Are Atheists

Real cause of overwhelming Jewish atheistic tendencies seems to be
tragic ignorance of Judaism’s most profound teachings and ideas.

Source: https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3809043,00.html

–=–

Jewish Atheism And Jewish Theism: The Data And The Dilemma

American Judaism has a God problem.
Actually, and paradoxically, it seems to have two God problems.
One is Jewish atheism. The other is Jewish theism.

Source: https://www.judaismandscience.com/jewish-atheism-and-jewish-theism-the-data-and-the-dilemma/

–=–

You see, what hitler was warning these Jews about was not his intention to gas them into oblivion, but rather that it was and still is their very open and obvious antichrist behavior that purposefully and doctrinally goes against the Christian and Muslim founded nations, of which the international Jew was and still is pretending citizenship under. To be clear, the reason that Hitler and for that matter all other Christian-based Nations did not want the Jew to infiltrate and become a powerful player in their governments is the same exact reason that American congresses of the past vehemently refused freemasons and Mormons from becoming congressmen and presidents, including the family of Mitt Romney, because the members of these non-religious corporate structures, these societies and keepers of their own secrets, must take an oath to hold, protect, and benefit that cult over that of the nation they pretend to serve. What a Mormon or freemason (or duel-Israeli citizen) does is for the good of the brotherhood, not the nation, unless the goals of the brotherhood are the same as the nation, which of course become more similar the more masons or Mormons gain political power in the nation. It is no secret, and is in fact a common rhetorical statement, that what a Jew does in America is for Israel, not America, except when America’s goal is the protection, financial support, or furtherance of Israel and the Babylonian Mosaic, Noahide, antichrist law. This is not something that can be debated once a tiny bit of due diligence is accomplished.

I could go on here, listing the inordinate amount of both self-ascribed “Jews” and those related by blood to them in positions of power, as CEO’s of the worst corporations, as heads of media, banking, finance, and government, but you’ve no doubt heard it all before and have probably heard the Zionist lobbies deny these provable facts at every turn. To pretend American politics and business is not infiltrated by this brood is not even a conception worth mentioning here, except to say that only this institutionalized ignorance can cause it all to continue. This is not a race, nor a religion. It’s nothing more or less than a eugenic system of organized crime pretending to be the same ancient tribes of yesteryear. A modern Jew is and can only be what it is defined as in the Bible, the fallen Israelite, no longer bound to God or Its Law, and antichrist (opposed to the New Testament in every instance it fulfills and corrects the Old Testament Law of the Jews).

The point here is only to discredit the discreditors, to reveal the real infiltrators, and to delegitimize the very mythological tale of the Zionist Jew in Israel and internationally as anything historical or legitimate. You are vastly becoming worse than what you portray the Nazis as doing unto you. There are many religious yahoodim of today that refuse to be part of the legal fiction called secular Israel, be it religious Biblical objections or the cultural, moral rectitude they have by being citizens of those foreign countries. And even within Israel that orthodoxy that remains opposed to secular Israel’s crimes against humanity and irreconcilable differences from the Bible are labeled as “extremists” for their positions — atheist false “Jews” censoring other Jews.

And so Mr. Foxman of the ADL, you transparent fraud, though I can’t say that I look forward to your and your criminal organizations’ continued, clandestine censorship, blacklisting, and shadow-banning of my name and works, I can certainly send a big SCREW YOU by exposing you to the few that I can still reach through word of mouth and that still care to learn here on my little politically ousted and capsized platform today. Hell has a lovely place reserved for you and your defaming brood.

And to those calling themselves as Israelites and pretending Jew is the same word, wake the hell up. You are not acting as nor qualified to call yourselves by such a holy term as Hebrew or Israelite. You are merely the ignorant goyim of the legal (anti-God) state of Israel, same as any other nation ruled by those European royal families (tribes of the name/shem). Your legal (artificial) citizenship to a secular municipal corporation in the desert does not cause you to be magically transformed into an ancient, spiritual, God-fearing people that you have no relationship to in the first place, as you beat and steal the lands and property of those arabs that are actually “semite” by definition, and who have more in common with the actual bloodlines of the ancient Israelites than you ever will.

Try doing unto others as you’d have them do unto you, lest you find yourselves exactly as Hitler warned and as your grandparents found themselves, persecuted and without a homeland once again. After all, that is what you are doing to others today. You remain the Jewish problem, not the solution. May Karma, if it exists, bite you squarely upon the ass, or may you become true sons of God in order to overcome these Zionist parasites and therefore not be forced to reap the horrific spiritual and physical backlash you’ve sowed upon all others.

Peace out!

.

Clint richard-son (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
Sunday, September 15th, 2019

 

Your Child Is Retarded, Not Autistic, And Here’s Why


Yeah, yeah, before the brave new world order social justice hate speech newspeak fucknut manifests out from under your multiple personality syndrome-induced social media reeducated persona, I advise you to read the following information before succumbing to such manipulative media conditioning. Because the more you ignore the actual problem, the more retarded we all will become.

In researching for my upcoming documentary, I have come to understand that this is not only a war on our mind, body, and soul, but a battle of words.

I remember the time period, without recalling when or where it actually began, when the word “retarded” was systematically removed from the English language and labeled as some sort of hate speech or improper terminology to describe otherwise retarded people, especially kids. Anyone that grew up in my generation knew what that word meant and exactly who fell under that label. And while it was used as an insult like any other word for “normally” functioning kids as well, we understood the difference and weren’t afraid to use it. A rose by any other name is still a rose, it is said, and I dare say in this day and age that a retarded kid is still a retarded kid by any other name… including “autistic.”

Autism. The flowery term that nobody can quite define and which replaced the classics like retarded, deformed, handicapped, and harmed. Autism. How dare we call them anything else but by this non-binary term of normalization and non-hate. What idiots we truly are.

So I decided to ask the question, why? Why did retardation suddenly become a bad word, a hateful term? Why were we entrained and brainwashed into not using this perfectly descriptive term of nature to describe a condition that is obviously not in harmony with nature or normal functionality? Oh, sorry, am I not supposed to use the word normal now? Is it normality-challenged? Or is it that we are so unhealthy from diet, drugs, and vaccines that there is no comparatively normal state of health to utilize as a guidepost anymore?

Let’s cut to the chase…

A better question to answer is this: Who benefits? Who receives the advantage when a word like retarded is suddenly stripped from the proper verbiage and use of the common language. Most would answer with the classic excuse, to protect the children. Bullshit. If anything, this ignorance of the facts has caused more harm to children, as is evidenced in health statistics. So what about pharmaceutical companies? Legal, licensed drug pushers? You know, the ones that came up with the “ask your doctor if this poison is right for you” marketing strategy? In the end, what possible benefit could be had by removing the general term “retarded” and replacing it with quite specific, non-provable psychiatrical terms of art like “autism” and “Attention Deficit Disorder” and thousands of other mental or physical retardations by any other name?

Let me show you.

From the CDC.gov website for vaccine side effects, we read:

Possible Side-effects from Vaccines

Any vaccine can cause side effects. For the most part these are minor (for example, a sore arm or low-grade fever) and go away within a few days. Listed below are vaccines licensed in the United States and side effects that have been associated with each of them. This information is copied directly from CDC’s Vaccine Information Statements (VISs), which in turn are derived from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommendationsfor each vaccine.

Remember, vaccines are continually monitored for safety, and like any medication, vaccines can cause side effects. However, a decision not to immunize a child also involves risk and could put the child and others who come into contact with him or her at risk of contracting a potentially deadly disease.

What are the risks from DTaP vaccine?

    • Long-term seizures, coma, lowered consciousness, or permanent brain damage happen extremely rarely after DTaP vaccination.

As with any medicine, there is a very remote chance of a vaccine causing a severe allergic reaction, other serious injury, or death.

What are the risks from inactivated influenza vaccine?

    • There may be a small increased risk of Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) after inactivated flu vaccine…
    • Young children who get the flu shot along with pneumococcal vaccine (PCV13), and/or DTaP vaccine at the same time might be slightly more likely to have a seizure caused by fever. Ask your doctor for more information. Tell your doctor if a child who is getting flu vaccine has ever had a seizure.

As with any medicine, there is a very remote chance of a vaccine causing a serious injury or death.

What are the risks from MMR vaccine?

Moderate events:

      • Seizure (jerking or staring) often associated with fever
      • Temporary pain and stiffness in the joints, mostly in teenage or adult women
      • Temporary low platelet count, which can cause unusual bleeding or bruising
      • Rash all over body

Severe events occur very rarely:

      • Deafness
      • Long-term seizures, coma, or lowered consciousness
      • Brain damage

What are the risks from MMRV vaccine?

Moderate events:

      • Seizure (jerking or staring) often associated with fever
        • The risk of these seizures is higher after MMRV than after separate MMR and chickenpox vaccines when given as the first dose of the series. Your doctor can advise you about the appropriate vaccines for your child.
      • Temporary low platelet count, which can cause unusual bleeding or bruising
      • Infection of the lungs (pneumonia) or the brain and spinal cord coverings (encephalitis, meningitis)
      • Rash all over the body

If your child gets a rash after vaccination, it might be related to the varicella component of the vaccine. A child who has a rash after MMRV vaccination might be able to spread the varicella vaccine virus to an unprotected person. Even though this happens very rarely, children who develop a rash should stay away from people with weakened immune systems and unvaccinated infants until the rash goes away. Talk with your health care provider to learn more.

Severe events have very rarely been reported following MMR vaccination, and might also happen after MMRV. These include:

      • Deafness
      • Long-term seizures, coma, lowered consciousness
      • Brain damage

What are the risks from meningococcal vaccines?

As many as half of the people who get meningococcal ACWY vaccine have mild problems following vaccination, such as redness or soreness where the shot was given.

What are the risks from rabies vaccine?

A vaccine, like any medicine, is capable of causing serious problems, such as severe allergic reactions. The risk of a vaccine causing serious harm, or death, is extremely small. Serious problems from rabies vaccine are very rare.

Mild problems

      • soreness, redness, swelling, or itching where the shot was given (30% – 74%)
      • headache, nausea, abdominal pain, muscle aches, dizziness (5% – 40%)

Moderate problems

      • hives, pain in the joints, fever (about 6% of booster doses)

Other nervous system disorders, such as Guillain Barré syndrome (GBS), have been reported after rabies vaccine, but this happens so rarely that it is not known whether they are related to the vaccine.

NOTE: Several brands of rabies vaccine are available in the United States, and reactions may vary between brands. Your provider can give you more information about a particular brand.

What are the risks from rotavirus vaccine?

Serious problems following rotavirus vaccine:

      • Intussusception is a type of bowel blockage that is treated in a hospital, and could require surgery. It happens “naturally” in some babies every year in the United States, and usually there is no known reason for it.There is also a small risk of intussusception from rotavirus vaccination, usually within a week after the 1st or 2ndvaccine dose. This additional risk is estimated to range from about 1 in 20,000 to 1 in 100,000 US infants who get rotavirus vaccine. Your doctor can give you more information.

What are the risks from chickenpox vaccine?

More serious events following chickenpox vaccination are rare. They can include:

      • Seizure (jerking or staring) often associated with fever
      • Infection of the lungs (pneumonia) or the brain and spinal cord coverings (meningitis)
      • Rash all over the body

A person who develops a rash after chickenpox vaccination might be able to spread the varicella vaccine virus to an unprotected person. Even though this happens very rarely, anyone who gets a rash should stay away from people with weakened immune systems and unvaccinated infants until the rash goes away. Talk with your health care provider to learn more.

What are the risks from Yellow Fever vaccine?

Severe problems

      • Severe allergic reaction to a vaccine component (about 1 person in 55,000).
      • Severe nervous system reaction (about 1 person in 125,000).
      • Life-threatening severe illness with organ failure (about 1 person in 250,000). More than half the people who suffer this side effect die.

Source: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/side-effects.htm

–=–

Oh, I’m sorry, am I allowed to say the words brain damage, lowered consciousness, brain infection leading to encephalitis and meningitis, brain seizures causing blank staring, paralyzation, and all these other forms of RETARDATION of the brain and body? Or am I being politically incorrect, even though these are the exact medical terms of artful language used by the CDC, which is immune from such social justice hate speech bullshit?

Are you so dumbed-down and pacified that you will actually ignore such purposefully utilized terms and seek damages for a word not even acknowledged here, like autism?

What you will seldom if ever see is that a vaccine causes autism. General retardation? Yes, obviously so. Autism? No sir. All of these above listed “side effects” are very specific terms used to describe very specific and localized retardations of the human body and its symptoms. Autism is non-specific, not qualified, and therefore is not a side effect. Autism is a syndrome, not a specific disease. Autism is a creation of psychiatry, not medicine. If your child has autism, that means he or she has several side effects that have RETARDED his or her brain and other systems of the body. A syndrome necessarily connotes more than one condition or problem into some new age term that is pretended to be nice and fairy-like, where in the land of autism children can do amazing things and even hold steady jobs that require no critical thinking while riding magical unicorns and be free of that horrific Truth doctrine, where the state can take control and utilize that hoard of “special” people for various mundane tasks and call it gainful employment (use). In the novel Brave New World, these were the Deltas, or Gammas, the lo-level ordinaries that served only one purpose – to serve the Alphas and Betas.

Back in high school, I remember that this was the collective group of retarded kids that attended “special education” and rode the short bus. This was not an offensive term, merely a very accurate and even empathetic term used to describe their collective plight. In fact, the good kids like me often helped, volunteered to hang out and tutor, and often protected the retarded kids from the bullies and other sociopathic kids, you know, the ones that grew up to become today’s corporate CEOs, Doctors, Psychiatrists, and pharmaceutical makers and marketers. But today, we apparently cannot acknowledge the truth, that these kids were destroyed internally through vaccines and/or other drugs, so as to limit the liability of the drug-makers and their agents that all but run and make policy within the CDC and FDA.

Retardation is not a bad word. It’s ok to acknowledge the Truth, even in a world gone mad with institutionalized lies and socially restricted speech.

RETARD – verb transitive – [Latin retardo; re and tardo, to delay, tardus, slow, late. See Target.] 1. To diminish the velocity of motion; to hinder; to render more slow in progress; as, to retard the march of an army; to retard the motion of a ship. The resistance of air retards the velocity of a cannon ball. It is opposed to accelerate. 2. To delay; to put off; to render more late; as, to retard the attacks of old age; to retard a rupture between nations. My visit was retarded by business. – verb intransitive – To stay back. [Not in use.] (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

–=–

That’s right, to be retarded is to be held back, as in, from the rest of the class. But as the effect of a biological weapon like vaccines, this word retard describes exactly what has happened to a very large and infinitely growing minority of children today. In my generation and before, we didn’t call them retarded because of some deformity, but because their capacity to learn, to think, to perform, or to function was diminished. And despite the childish, immature rhetoric of school children, this term was one of neutrality used to properly identify and care for kids. The fact that you have been tricked into not using such an accurate, perfectly descriptive word is not helping your child in any way, but is rather a sign of your own retardation of common sense and saneness.

And guess what. Here we have the vaccine manufacturers and the CDC openly admitting that vaccines cause retardations due to brain damage and the like. But nowhere does it say autism. So why would you try and sue a company that openly admits it causes such physical and mental retardations by calling that rose by a different name, a name that they are adamantly opposed to being a side effect or symptom of its drugs, and where such nonsense is protected legal speech by government agencies? Why call it autism when they call it brain damage (retardation)?

This newspeak and willful ignorance is getting so bad that they are expanding the “spectrum” of autism to engulf and erase the names of many other disease states, even to the point of normalizing sociopathic, psychopathic, and non-empathetic behaviorisms.

–=–

Careful! According to this lady, everyone I know, including myself, is suffering from high-functioning autism in some way. Don’t like crowds of loud, drunken idiots? You must be high-functioning autistic. Have a problem with pointless, nervous small talk? You may be high-functioning autistic. Are you preoccupied with your daily routine? You may be a high-functioning autistic. Are you like me, someone that wants to learn everything about a subject before pretending to know everything about a subject? Well, you must be a rain-man, a high-functioning autistic. Want to move on to another subject after you fully learn another? You guessed it. You may be on the fucking spectrum. Want to correct someone that is full of shit? You must be high-functioning autistic. Hate pep rallies and shitloads of people acting socially unacceptable to you? Feel like you need to remove yourself from groups of people you don’t like and don’t want to associate with? Hate watching sports? Well then, you must be high-functioning autistic. Are you introverted? You are likely autistic, but high-functioning. Are you extroverted but intrusively social? You are also autistically high-functioning. Apparently, according to these psychiatric frauds, I’m the king of highness on the high-functioning autism spectrum. But then, who isn’t? I bet you are right there with me. How can anyone not be? The sociopath, perhaps, is immune, as one who can pretend to relate to anyone they choose while in actuality having no mental or spiritual connection at all to anyone, no moral Law or normally developed feelings to get in the way?

If that’s my choice, go ahead, call me autistic.

After all, normal is the new retarded at this point.

Or perhaps I’m just a high-functioning neuro-typical?

If everyone is autistic then nobody is, and we can all pretend to exist in the land of unicorns and imbibe in magical normality potions (psych drugs).

I heard the other day that games like Minecraft and Pokemon are designed by “aspies,” that is, men with Asperger’s Syndrome, now called as high-functioning autistics. This includes men like Microsoft’s Bill Gates and Apple’s Steve Jobs. Think about that for a moment — Bill Gates, the pioneer of innovative, sustainable, world-wide vaccine delivery to ALL CHILDREN around the globe.

As for the rest of her presentation, yes, vaccines and especially the metals used therein are a known cause of destroying the frontal lobe and mirror neuron functionality. But you’ll have to wait for the documentary for that, or actually look it up for yourself. But then, doing research yourself instead of trusting your doctor might make you a high-functioning autistic. In fact, according to the psychiatry field and its DSM, the term “neuro-typical” or having a non-retarded or normally functioning brain is being used to demonize anyone not autistic!

Let’s be clear. Cancer is not normal. Obesity is not normal. Diabetes is not normal. And autism is not normal. We should not treat any of these as if they are.

Remember, it is no measure of health to be well-adjusted to a profoundly sick society. Believe it or not, today this type of neuro-typical, absolutely reasonable and self-evident thought is now considered politically incorrect. And for someone like me, who has no desire to succeed or find wealth or status in this profoundly sick society, according to the world-view of the psychiatrist, I am a high-functioning autistic suffering from moral rectitude. Normality, that is, a man that has no brain damage and exists without retardation, is today considered as a psychiatric disease.

For more on the pusillanimous nature of banning not only words but the masculinity (power) behind words, check out my blog here: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2017/08/18/the-true-intent-behind-counter-cultural-gender-neutralization/

Do vaccines cause the actual symptoms behind the diagnosis of autism? Of course they do, and admittedly so. See my blog here: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2018/06/19/yes-vaccines-have-caused-sids-and-autism-must-read-and-share/

YOU AND YOUR CHILDREN ARE BEING RETARDED BY VACCINES AND DRUGS.

GROW THE FUCK UP AND GET OVER THE SOCIAL STIGMA.

STOP ACTING AS IF YOU ARE RETARDED AND DO THE RIGHT THING FOR YOUR CHILDREN.

STOP TREATING YOUR RETARDED CHILD AS IF “AUTISM” IS NORMAL. YOU SHOULD BE OUTRAGED! THIS IS WAR!

SPEAK FREELY AND PROPERLY, NOT ACCORDING TO SOCCER MOMS, THE PTA, AND MEDIA WHORES, BUT ACCORDING TO TRUTH AND IN PROPER LANGUAGE.

PSYCHIATRY IS LOW-FUNCTIONING AUTISM.

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS IS SPIRITUAL DEATH.

.

–Clint richard-son (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Friday, September 6th, 2019

 

 

 

Why Men Of Good Conscience Can Never Be Famous


The_Devil's_Contract

About 8 months ago, I was initially approached through email by a production company out of Texas to be on television. In my excitement, I of course told family and friends close to me without consideration of the events that would follow. It’s a horrible feeling to have to retract such statements of fact, that I would be interviewed for television. Oh, what a fool I can be…

They had seen my “alternative” interview on video games, how they’re made and their destructive effect on empathy and morality, and wanted to interview me on camera for a new “conspiracy” centric type of show. At first thought, I remember feeling cautiously excited, considering that the result of this exposure would at the very least have the positive effect of bringing readers and viewers and listeners to my various works. It was not by any means a paid gig, just an interview like any other of the over 1,000 I’d already done without any financial compensation, only this time it would be aired on television. My reward has always been the people I’ve touched, the extraordinary health of the children I’ve helped keep from disease-causing vaccines, and the various other comments and kudos I receive that keep me doing what I’m doing. Of course, there are plenty of detractors, contrarians, sophists, and the like, though they never seem to have much ground to stand on in the face of primary source material; no integrity.

I asked a few friends whether they thought this “appearance” was a good idea, that is, if I should trust such a Hollywood production considering the absolute shit that is on television already. The answer was generally no, I shouldn’t, with the exception of my always supportive immediate family. And on the surface, I agreed, especially after seeing first hand the hit pieces done to previous guests of mine in media. All around, involvement with that brood is just a bad idea. I should know, I worked amongst them for long enough to see it all for what it is. Yet circumstances led me to happen to be close to the L.A. area at the same time they would be, and they extended the invitation once more to meet up and conduct an on-camera interview.

I hesitantly agreed to meet, not knowing what would have been in store for me if some uncontrollable circumstances hadn’t intervened. They called and informed me that they couldn’t make the appointment. As fate would dictate, they had to cancel and again asked if we could do said interview on another date in the near future.

Some time went by, and there again appeared an email with a similar invitation, though I’d have to fly on my own dime to participate. Nice. I reconsidered the positive vs. the negative possibilities and, though erring on the side of caution, I again agreed to do the interview at some near, unset future date.

It was the next email link, however, that shone darkly in this strange chain of correspondences, and that’s what I’d really like to speak to you about today. For it was only then that they even mentioned and sent over to me any semblance or mention of a contract. And yes, as it turns out, my previous, seemingly unwarranted, paranoid fear and hesitation was immediately solidified into a well-justified validation of my former, precognitive, cautionary stance.

It is often said that those who appear on television and receive that delusion of fame are sell-outs, from stage actors to the music industry to the alternative radio sect. Of course, after receiving this horrific contract, I can definitely state that this perception couldn’t be more True. For when I read through that contract, I knew right then that I would be selling my soul if I took this interview. The violations of common, moral decency and privacy contained within this agreement juxtaposed with those that apparently have already signed it or something similar to appear on television (and you know who they are) should not be mistaken as good and conscionable men. And this fact can only be shown to you by reprinting that horrific contract here.

So why did I adamantly refuse with all my will, with my spiritually-driven mind, body, and soul to sign that devil’s contract?

Here, please read it for yourself and tell me what lengths you would go to for your own 30 seconds of artificially induced fame?

The names and corporations involved have been kept unedited so as not to protect the guilty:

–=–

APPEARANCE RELEASE 

For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, I hereby grant to Texas Crew Productions, LLC and its parents, subsidiaries, licensees, successors, designees, and assigns (collectively, “Producer”) the right to use my name, likeness, voice, conversation, sounds, biographical data and/or material, and editorial comments concerning me (collectively, my “Appearance”) in and in connection with the program tentatively entitled “STRANGE WORLD” (“Program”).

I agree that Producer shall have the right to create and capture audiovisual, audio-only, visual-only, and literary works, including the production of video and/or audio tapes, photographs, films, and/or recordings of and from my Appearance, including any performance of any musical composition(s) (the “Materials”) by any method of recording.

I agree that no payment shall be due to me for the use of my Appearance and/or the rights granted by me under this Agreement, and Producer shall not be obligated to pay me or any third party any compensation whatsoever, regardless of the time or method of any use of the Materials. 

I further acknowledge and agree that the consideration I will receive for Producer’s use of my Appearance and the exercise of the rights granted by me is the opportunity for publicity that I will receive if Producer decides to include the Materials in the Program. Producer is not obligated to use the Materials in the Program or for any other purpose whatsoever. Producer may assign its rights hereunder in Producer’s sole discretion. 

I agree that all results and proceeds of my Appearance and services hereunder (the “Results and Proceeds”) shall be deemed a work-made-for-hire specially ordered or commissioned by Producer for use as part of a motion picture or other audio-visual work pursuant to Section 201 of the United States Copyright Act of 1976, as amended.

Producer, or Producer’s agents and assigns, shall forever be the exclusive owner in all rights, including copyright, in the Materials and the Results and Proceeds of such Materials, and shall have the irrevocable right to use, and license others to use, the Materials in whole or in part, an unlimited number of times, in all languages, in all media whether now known or hereafter devised, anywhere in the universe in perpetuity in connection with all forms of exploitation, including without limitation, advertising, sale, promotion, marketing, merchandising, and distribution of the Program, other programs, or other products and/or services, including without limitation direct or indirect endorsements. 

Producer shall have the right to edit the Materials in any manner or form, and I waive any right to inspect or approve of any use of the Materials, including droit moral or moral rights, if any. 

Notwithstanding the foregoing, if and to the extent the Results and Proceeds are not deemed a “work-made-for-hire”, I hereby assign to Producer, in perpetuity and throughout the universe, in any and all manners, formats and medias, whether now known or hereafter devised, all right, title and interest (including, without limitation, all rights of copyright) in and to the Results and Proceeds. I waive the benefit of any provision known as “droit moral” or moral rights of authors or any similar or analogous law or decision in any country of the world. 

I acknowledge that Producer is relying on the representations, warranties and permissions granted herein, and my breach thereof would cause Producer irreparable injury and damage that cannot be reasonably or adequately compensated in an action at law. I hereby expressly agree that Producer shall be entitled to injunctive and other equitable relief to prevent and/or cure any breach or threatened breach of this Agreement by me.

I further acknowledge that Producer is relying on the permissions granted herein to the degree described above and hereby agree not to assert any claim of any nature whatsoever (including any claims for injunctive relief and/or money damages) against anyone relating to the exercise of the permissions and rights granted hereunder. I expressly waive any and all moral rights I may have in connection with the Materials and/or my Appearance. I also waive any claim or action for defamation against Producer and/or any claim that the Materials are, or may be claimed to be, defamatory, untrue or censorable in nature. I waive any right to injunctive relief and agree that I will not in any event be entitled to prevent or inhibit the exhibition, distribution, use or exploitation of the Materials, the Program and/or my Appearance therein. I waive any right to terminate or rescind this agreement. The termination of this Agreement, for any reason, shall not affect Producer’s rights in the Results and Proceeds of the taping, filming and photography, the Materials or my Appearance. This paragraph shall survive the termination or the expiration of this Agreement. 

I agree to release, defend, indemnify and hold Producer and the exhibiting network and their respective affiliates, successors and assigns, and the officers, directors, employees, agents and representatives thereof (collectively, the “Producer Parties”), harmless from any and all claims, demands, costs (including attorneys’ fees) and causes of action of any kind or nature whatsoever now and in the future, including, without limitation, defamation, bodily harm, infliction of emotional distress and invasion of privacy, property damage, rights of publicity, commercial disparagement, and/or infringement of any other proprietary and/or personal rights arising out of or in connection with my Appearance, statements and/or actions in or creation of the Materials and/or the Program.

I acknowledge that there is a possibility that subsequent to the execution of this Agreement, I may discover facts or incur or suffer claims which were unknown or unsuspected at the time this Agreement was executed, and which if known by me at that time may have materially affected my decision to execute this Agreement. I acknowledge and agree that by reason of this Agreement, and the releases contained in the preceding paragraphs, I am assuming any risk of such unknown facts and such unknown and unsuspected claims. 

Additionally, I acknowledge awareness of and hereby waive any rights and benefits afforded by California Civil Code Section 1542, which provides: A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS WHICH THE CREDITOR DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS OR HER FAVOR AT THE TIME OF EXECUTING THE RELEASE, WHICH IF KNOWN BY HIM OR HER MUST HAVE MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR.

I represent and warrant that: (i) I have the full power and right to make and perform this agreement and the consent of no other person or entity is necessary to grant the rights hereunder; (ii) I have not given or agreed to give any member of the production staff or anyone associated in any manner with the Program or any representative of Producer anything of value to arrange my appearance in the Program or the advertisements therefor; and (iii) any statements made by me during my Appearance are true to the best of my knowledge, and neither they nor my Appearance will violate or infringe upon the rights of Producer or any third party.

I acknowledge and agree that (i) this is a non-union agreement and that my participation and Appearance hereunder shall not be subject to the terms of any collective bargaining agreement; and (ii) Producer is not a signatory to any collective bargaining agreement covering my participation and Appearance hereunder.

I acknowledge that in connection with my participation in the Program, confidential and/or proprietary information of Producer and/or the Program (“Confidential Information“) may be revealed to me. Such Confidential Information shall include, without limitation, information regarding the Program’s concept, format and/or ideas, the participant selection process, identities of participants, challenges and/or activities that may be included in the Program, locations of the Program, the content and final outcome of the Program or of any episode, and any other confidential and/or proprietary information relating to the Program and/or any of the Producer Parties. In consideration of the opportunity to participate in the Program, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, and as a material inducement to Producer to invite me to participate in the Program, I expressly agree that I shall not, directly or indirectly, verbally or otherwise, at any time (whether or not I ultimately appear in the Program), publish, reveal, disseminate, disclose, or cause to be published, revealed, disseminated or disclosed (herein “Disclosure“) any Confidential Information to any person, firm or entity whatsoever (herein “Third Parties“) nor shall I issue any press release or public statement relating to the Program, Producer, my Appearance or this Agreement without Producer’s prior written consent.

If any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this agreement, or the breach of any term hereof, cannot be settled through direct discussions, the parties agree to endeavor to first settle the controversy or claim by mediation conducted in Angeles County, State of California, and administered by JAMS under its applicable rules. If a dispute is not otherwise resolved through direct discussions or mediation, the controversy or claim, including the scope or applicability of this agreement to arbitrate, shall be resolved by binding confidential arbitration conducted in Los Angeles County, State of California, and administered by JAMS in accordance with the Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures of JAMS or subsequent versions thereof, including the optional appeal procedure and including, without limitation, the rule providing that each party shall pay pro rata its share of JAMS fees and expenses, and the rules providing for limited discovery and other exchange of information. The JAMS Rules for selection of an arbitrator shall be followed, except that the arbitrator shall be an experienced entertainment law arbitrator licensed to practice law in California or a retired judge. I agree that any dispute resolution proceedings will be conducted only on an individual basis and not in a class, consolidated or representative action. Notwithstanding the above requirements, if a party files suit in court or files an arbitration before first seeking to mediate, in direct violation of this paragraph, the other party does not have to request mediation to enforce the right to compel arbitration as required under this paragraph. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing in this Agreement or in any of the applicable rules of JAMS shall prevent Producer from seeking provisional relief outside of arbitration (without posting any bond) for any breach or threatened breach by me of this agreement, including, without limitation, equitable and/or injunctive relief. 

This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California, regardless of the place of its physical execution and shall be binding on me and my successors, parents, licensees, legal representatives, heirs, and assigns (as applicable). I shall not raise, and hereby waive, any defenses based upon improper venue, inconvenience of the forum, lack of personal jurisdiction, or the sufficiency of service of process.

Initial ________ 

AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED

–=–

Talk about the devils contract!

To be clear, I refused this in triplicate, sending a return email with all of my objections for the record, which if you know me and my work, should be obvious. Amazingly, I did so because the employee that received my absolute denial and condemnation of this contract sent me the following reply:

Viviana Galvis <viviana@texascrew.com>
Fri 4/5/2019 11:38 AM
  • Clint;
  • Allison Jones <allison@texascrew.com>

Dear Clint,

I’ve been discussing with the producers about this matter and we are willing to hear your thoughts or concerns in the release and work around a template (contract) that will be suitable for both parts.
We are not a Hollywood production, our production company is providing content for the Travel Channel, however, as the Travel Channel has acquired Discovery, they usually require a license like this one, that allows the production to use your image without any problems, like stopping the production etc.
Your intellectual rights are still yours and those are not transferable, but as you will be sharing ideas, and ideas have no copyright, we want to make sure that you will be comfortable by sharing your ideas with us on camera.
Trust me, I’m Colombian and have worked in some productions with a lot of legalese back and forth and some of this results overwhelming for people that doesn’t understand about the requirements from some American networks. Fortunately, you know the language, you have experience in the tv industry and maybe with some corrections, we can all be happy.
Let me know your thoughts, we’d be happy to offer solutions,
Viviana Galvis

–=–

Needless to say, the response I sent back rebuking the evil shit-pile that was this contract was not approved by the shyster entertainment attorneys that work for that conglomerate media corporation. In fact, I’ve never even heard a response back to my returned discourse. I gave them 5 months. Nothing. Screw em’.

But the takeaway, that is, what I really want you to know here today is two-fold. Firstly, that I always have and promise I will continue to hold my own inherent rights, integrity, and moral rectitude and standards above any “consideration” of fame and fortune (or lack thereof) promised by these corporate devils (attorneys). And secondly, you need to know that those who do sell out to these devils simply cannot be trusted, because trust is not an option. Choice is not an option, once the choice is made to give up choice. Their agreement to such terms is proof positive of a lack of integrity, and whatever is leftover is killed by contractual obligation. Their appearances on these predictive programing reality and conspiracy television shows confirms their willingness to sell out, their inherent vice, for they would not be on television without such contractual waivers being agreed to and signed. I am living proof of that fact.

You may take this for what it’s worth, choosing to ignore it or to take it to heart. There are no exceptions. This includes all news anchors, all entertainers, all talkshow hosts, all guests, all mainstream, syndicated radio hosts, and anyone playing a character in that Hollywood witchcraft of false show. I have never been asked to sign a contract in all this time until now, until getting close to that evil that is the interconnected Hollywood mainstream. Stop placing your faith in that vile cesspool.

I can show you this contract for one and only one reason, and this fact proves that I didn’t sign it or agree in any way to it. I chose not to give up any so-called rights to speak of their evil intentions. How many do you really think can say that? Even section 501 corporate churches (religions) are refrained from speaking up in political matters, because of similar contractual considerations with government and an artificial “non-profit” status. I will not allow my hands or my God-given (inherent), Natural rights to be tied by the signature of any legal persona.

As for my presence out here, I can only watch from afar, in my apparently self-induced obscurity, looking on as my false heroes die one at a time, watching them fall like dead ducks as they cross over into the “entertainment only” abyss. But at least I can watch with my own integrity intact. And maybe that’s enough.

But I gotta tell you, it’s sure starting to feel like an empty, lonely place out here.

.

–Clint richard-son (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Friday, August 30th, 2019

How To Use Religious Exemption Against Vaccination


I recently received yet another emailed inquiry regarding the three possible “exemptions” for vaccines. Probably more than any other subject this particular question rears its ugly head, and usually they reference religious exemption more than not. Now, I keep telling people not to ask me questions or listen to me if you don’t want the total, harsh reality that is the Truth, but they seem to want to be disappointed and disillusioned anyway. And so today I’m going to tell you that desire the Truth exactly how you can use religion as your sword against vaccination for you and your children.

First, though, let’s treat the other exemptions, those being medical excuse and conscientious objection.

Beginning with medical exemption, this particular legal exemption is a catch 22. In order to exempt yourself from a medical act, such as vaccination, you need a medical doctor’s letter. See the problem here? While in reason and truth any free-willed, neutral, educated medical doctor (an oxymoron) would exempt all his or her patients from the horrors of vaccination, the term “medical doctor” (MD) is not a real thing. It’s a flattering, legal title granted only to those willing to not act upon their conscience, and therefore possess and active ignorance and willingness to ignore actual science that shows the absolute ludicracy that is vaccination and the health epidemic it has caused. All that aside, the most important factor to understand for why this exemption is useless and revokable is because it is not an inherent right of any man. It is specifically a legal, man-made exemption that has nothing to do with God-given (Natural), inherent rights. All medical exemptions are powered by government permission to do so only, and the corporations that most doctors work for are known to fire without prejudice any nurse or doctor that either refuses vaccines for themselves or speaks publicly about the dangers of vaccines. In the near future, you will not find any doctor that will be willing to risk his or her career or funding just so you can protect yourself and your children from such dastardly pharmaceutical poisons. Because everyone in the world is technically qualified for a medical exemption when the actual research and studies are understood, it’s kind of like giving everyone in the world $1 million dollars: nothing would actually change, and in a few years most common people will have lost it anyway to the various schemes designed to legally steal it, such as medical billing, the #1 reason for bankruptcy in the United States. If everyone is exempt, then no-one is. This will make more sense as we continue…

The second exemption is conscientious objection. This one is about as realistic as it was in the draft for the Vietnam War. If a right is revokable, then again it’s not a Natural, inherent Right. If a right can be taken away, then it was never yours in the first place. And unfortunately, this applies to all three exemptions we are covering here. But more to the point, there is no real place for conscious objection in a legal system. The legal, civil law is strict. It is not up for contention. Follow it or be punished. Choice is an illusion when under the Roman (strict) matrix of legal law. Moral and conscientious thoughts are certainly allowed, but acting on them is a thought crime. It’s terrorism at best. If this wasn’t true, then government would fall tomorrow due to conscientious objections to its immoral policy of controlled chaos and madness. So the conscientious objection fallacy, while hopeful in its promise, is really just a cosmic joke. Just ask those who objected to the Vietnam War. You might need to go to Canada for that though… or visit them in prison.

To put this another way, we must understand that corporations, that is, legal persons, including individual citizenships of the United States, were invented in Roman times to be strictly exempt from moral and conscious responsibilities and actions. Corporations (persons) are designed by men to remove men from God’s Realm, from Nature, and therefore to pretend a legal (artificial) shelter from the moral Law, and equally from spiritual consciousness. The point is this: conscientious thought requires a spiritually and morally conscious man that acts by choice. This is impossible under and in the matrix of legal code. For there is no conscious in legal persons, places, or things. There is nothing. Emptiness. A void of anything Real, of anything Natural, of anything Created by God. Without choice, there can be no moral action. The legal law eliminates choice, leaving no ability to follow any alternative, moral path, and generally causes men to act against their religious, moral foundation. This is indeed the specific purpose of the legal system and the person-hood, the elimination of the need of men to choose at all times what Nature and Its Law requires. The legal law unbalances the scale, taking away the ability to spiritually measure right and wrong. A person that has no conscious cannot claim conscientious objection, for a legal person is property of the legal system, and like a video game character, is only allowed to exist by the rules of the legal game system and its masters (false gods). A pawn is ultimately moved by its master, headlong into oblivion, having no real choice except to go forward on the legal game board. No is not an option, and pawns have no exemptions or free will from their controllers. Real choice is simply not in the artificial code that makes up a legal person. A person is a construct of legal law. It has no conscious of its own. And the man that acts in legal person therefore surrenders any right to act on his or her own conscious, instead obeying strictly and under sanction the legal law of men without question, that is, without the right to act conscientiously.

And that leads us to the third legal exemption, that being a “religious” one. In this particular exemption we find a hint of the only True choice respected by government, the religious law. Sure, a medical exemption is respected, but doctors are agents of government, so once government removes the artificial, temporary right of doctors to exempt a patient and keep their jobs, then that exemption will be gone as well, as moral choice by the man acting as a “doctor” of government will no longer be an option. The difference between the medical and conscientious objection vs. the religious exemption is very simply that the legal law is in every case trumped by actual religious law.

The religious exemption, therefore, would seem to be the all powerful weapon to end all battles, right?

Wrong. And here’s why…

If you’ve ever seen a movie where the hero attempts to ward off evil spirits with a cross or crucifix, say in vampire movies or the fantastical films about Catholic priests committing exorcisms, you always find a recurring theme. They all say and warn the same thing: you have to have faith for that to work. In other words, to hold up an idol of anything and pretend that you have the power that that idol represents is what is called hypocrisy. If you want to harm a vampire or demon with a cross, then it is the power of God that does it, not some trinket made by the hands of men. But when actual religious faith comes into the soul bearing that idol, suddenly the power of God is behind it, and the mere idol turns into a weapon of unimaginable proportions.

This is, of course, merely the fiction of Hollywood. Or is it? Is there actually a moral lesson to learn from these fantasies? Can this concept be applied to the subject at hand, that is, vaccination exemption?

Absolutely. In fact, we can use it as a very understandable metaphor.

Let us pretend that the idol in these ridiculous Hollywood stories, the cross, is what we are holding up as our own figurative weapon of legal “religious exemption.” Can a self-proclaimed “atheist” possibly use religious exemption without believing in the very Source of that weapon? The answer in Reality, of course, is no. But the legal realm is not Reality, and so yes, strangely enough an atheist can use a legally invented idol called as religious exemption. In other words, the atheist can openly commit hypocrisy against his own false belief system, and the legal system is happy to protect that right of hypocrisy… until, that is, the governmental body of that legal system is ready to retract it. And that’s where most of us find ourselves today, watching helplessly as the administrators of the persons (property) of the legal matrix change its programming code to legally reflect that religious exemption is no longer an idol that is acceptable to be used.

But how can it do that?

Simple. These legal exemptions never existed in Reality in the first place for any man. Legalism is fiction. Legal law is fiction. And so any exemption that comes from a legal government (artificial person) was born and will die in fiction. And any religious claim you may make as a legal, artificial, fictional person dies with it.

You see, the whole time you’ve been that hero (actor) trying to use an idol that has nothing to do with what that symbol’s actual Source is. To use a True religious right, a man (male or female) must act as a religions man. Persons (legal fictions) cannot be religious nor act under the Higher religious law, because persons aren’t of Nature. They aren’t Real. They are not Creations of God. Thus, the vampiric demons of government, that is, attorneys in black moo-moos acting as false gods (magistrates/judges) have no revulsion to your false idol of religious exemption. You’ve gotta have faith for that to work…

Please watch these for your understanding, they are placed here by me for a purpose.

–=–

Idolatry: the TV actor, Vincent, before True faith:

And the God-fearing man Vincent after True faith:

–=–

The cross only represents the Law of God (Jesus Christ/Logos), but without faith, the Law of God is a useless idol in any form. Without following the Law, It has no power to protect you, and as a weapon it’s pointless. It’s just an idol for sinners pretending to worship God through Jesus Christ (Law). Might as well hold up a kitten without claws.

Keep in mind this is metaphoric, and that its meaning applies to defeating all things that are “evil” in the Bible, which essentially is anything man-made, including the legal matrix code. The vampire (attorney) must corrupt your blood in order to control you. The fangs of the vampire are the words of a legal contract. And personhood is to be bound under the spell (spelling of words) of the master of that contract, causing the agentic relationship of master and servant (volunteerism). The Law of God (Nature), represented by the symbol of the cross here, is that which defeats the vampire (attorney). The word of Truth (God) destroys the words of legal demons. The cross represents the implementation of moral choice. The vampires of government have no control over you unless you accept their initial, original sin, the corruption of blood (attainder) that places artificial status upon you in their own, invented society.

And this depiction of false faith in a false idol of god describes just about every “Christian” in the United States, and for that matter, the world. Legal religions (corporations) are institutionalized idolatry, causing men to attempt in vein to worship God while doing so in legal, fictional persona (mask), to bear the protection of God and Its Law while not following that law themselves, as if It is external from them. And this is why the Christian “church” has no power religiously or politically. A section 501 corporation is designed to take away religious rights and exemptions, not bestow them. Only a fool can possibly believe that God-given rights can be given by a legal corporation under the IRS code of government. Only a brainwashed man can be made to believe a corporation (artificial person) has anything to do with the Source of Nature and Its Law. Only a idolator can call himself a “Christian” while following the legal, antichrist, anti-God law of man. Only a slave cannot differentiate between the God of Nature and the false gods of legal government. For the actual, True church of the Bible is only a free and moral, private People, that is, men following the Law of God (Nature), which absolutely excludes and despises all legal code. But in legalism, the “church” is a legal term of art meaning a corporation, an artificial person in law, and has nothing to do with men. In other words, legally established religions are not in any way part of God’s Realm or Law. They are a legal simulation of the Real, and so are its members. Corporate religions bound completely under legal government is like a bug trap for men, burning our wings so that we cannot fly away, keeping us locked into the legal (anti-God) system of law even while allowing us to pretend in idolatry through flattering title (without True faith) that we are followers of the Law of the Bible, of the example of Jesus Christ. Worst of all, this is all warned about in the Bible, which calls us foolish hypocrites as the figurative dumb asses.

But here’s the kicker. Men are hypocrites toward the Law of God (Nature) in the Real world. But in the legal matrix, persons are simulators. Simulation and hypocrisy are the same term. Therefore, to act in legal persona (mask) under legal (anti-God) law in the legal simulation while at the same time pretending to be a True “Christian” equals the metaphor of being plugged into the matrix (lie) with or without contemplation of ones actual hypocrisy as a man. The “Christian” flattering title is merely ones “projected self-image” while trapped inside the legal matrix code. It’s idolatry. Simulation. But in Nature, from God’s perspective, if you will, simulation equals hypocrisy, two different words that mean the same thing in the two different realms.

It’s also called apostasy, and it’s the foundational purpose of corporate Christianity. It’s the opposite of being an apostle:

APOSTASY – In English law. The total renunciation of Christianity, by embracing either a false religion or no religion at all. This offense can only take place in such as have once professed the Christian religion. (–Black’s Law 2nd Edition)

APOSTASY – noun – [Gr. a defection, to depart.1. An abandonment of what one has professed; a total desertion, or departure from one’s faith or religion. 2. The desertion from a party to which one has adhered… (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

APOSTATE – adjective – False; traitorous. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

HYPOCRITE – noun – 1. One who feigns to be what he is not; one who has the form of godliness without the power, or who assumes an appearance of piety and virtue, when he is destitute of true religion. And the hypocrite’s hope shall perish. Job 8:12. A dissembler; one who assumes a false appearance. Fair hypocrite you seek to cheat in vain. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

–=–

I go to church every Sunday (according to the legal Roman calendar, the Pope, and its legal system of secular law) and on legal holidays (which are not actually Holy Days) and therefore I’m a “Christian.” Time to call bullshit on that logical fallacy, isn’t it? It’s more like this: I don’t follow the Law of God by the example of the Christ allegory and instead have idolized the corporate churches false image of Jesus Christ as if Christ is God, and so I call myself as the Romans did, as a “Christian,” despite my membership to an apostate, corporate religion that makes its own doctrine and misleads me at every turn in simulation.

So how can you use religious exemption in the legal system? You can’t, dumb ass.

You’ve got to have faith for that to work. 

But the legal system and its public institutions have caused you to not even know what faith is! And so here is where I will tell you how to religiously bypass any legal law that requires persons to vaccinate.

Ready?

Stop acting in legal person (artificial, legal status).

Stop taking benefits from the demons and vampires of legal (anti-God) governments, which require you to voluntarily act in legal person.

Stop being an idolator.

Stop believing you have inherent, Natural, God-given rights when you sold them long ago to become a legal citizenship and as you continue to simulate the part.

Stop believing the foolish notion that God’s (religious) Law can save you when you don’t have True religion and faith as your sword (reason) and shield (protection).

Lastly, we must understand just what an exemption is and why it doesn’t and cannot exist for men of God.

EXEMPTION – 1. Freedom from any service, charge, burden, tax, evil, or requisition, to which others are subject; immunity; privilege. Many cities of Europe purchased or obtained exemptions from feudal servitude. No man can claim an exemption from pain, sorrow or death. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of Law)

EXEMPTION – Freedom from a general duty or service; immunity from a general burden, tax, or charge. A privilege allowed by law to a judgment debtor, by which he may hold property to a certain amount, or certain classes of property, free from all liability to levy and sale on execution or attachment. (–Black’s Law 2nd edition)

–=–

Why are these exacting definitions important to comprehend?

This is key. To have an exemption from vaccination means one and only one thing — vaccines are already a requirement. In other words, the government considers it your duty as its citizen (subject to its legal law) to be vaccinated. The exemption is a temporary, revokable “freedom” from that duty, a permission to avoid that requirement of law. Vaccines are already required of persons (property), which are performance debt-slaves of government. If you claim exemption, you are actually acknowledging and respecting the false legal law and its gods by getting their permission to have freedom from it. Remember, in legalese, freedom is defined as franchise. It’s not True freedom under God to self-govern, but rather an artificial freedom bestowed temporarily to the fictional person that you currently respect and utilize as a status in legal society. Remember, all man-made things are temporary. Therefore, if the person is required to be vaccinated, then you as surety in bond of that person must obey in order to retain that franchise (legal freedom), in order to continue using that person (legal status). Those who refuse the legal law and end up punished, fined, or imprisoned for their illegal behavior (while acting in legal persona) have broken the rules of their franchise (citizenship). People in jail also have freedom (franchise) when they are on good behavior. Same thing, different prison. In the open-air debtor’s prison of the nation, citizens (prisoners, as public, non self-governing wards of the state) are given certain exemptions in their franchise, meaning they have certain artificially induced freedoms allowed to them by permission, licensure, permit, etc. Only a fool would believe those rights and freedoms are God-given, Natural rights.

Inversely, we can understand our Duty to God (Nature), including ones requirement of following God’s Law of Nature by the example of Jesus Christ (Logos personified), which in itself requires no respect of lies, fictions, persons, status, titles, false gods (magistrates), or anything else artificially placed over Nature (Truth) in a simulation of the Real. Again, there is simply no exemption from God’s Law. With any God-given, inherent right comes an equal duty to all other men. Lies are not exempt from Truth, they are diametrically opposed to Truth. And so it’s important to understand that legalism, that is citizenship under the nation, is specifically designed to fictionally exempt man from his Duty to God, to Nature, and that includes ones Duty to all other men. As this is in Reality impossible, the legal system depends on its ability to cloud and obscure any relation we may have to Nature and Its Law, offering the protection of the legal law and the false sense of forgiveness offered by the false “Christian” corporate church that is also under legal law, not God’s. To defeat God (Nature), the state simply replaced God with a fictional, corporate entity (idol) of its own invention, and then called it legally as religion.

RELIGIOUS – When religious books or reading are spoken of, those which tend to promote the religion taught by the Christian dispensation must be considered as referred to, unless the meaning is so limited by associated words or circumstances as to show that the speaker or writer had reference to some other mode of worship. (–Black’s Law 2nd Edition)

–=–

In American law as a “Christian country” (referring to the free and private People of the States, not the United States legalist corporation as an open-air prison for publicly held-in-persona debt-slaves), the Bible is considered as the meaning of the term “religious” unless that word “religious” is intentionally twisted by the legal language to mean its opposite. Get it? In the United States district corporation, the word religious is a crime, but certain religious exemptions are allowed.

Allow me to quote my book, Strawman Volume 1, where True religion (action) of men and the legal franchise of limited, legal religious belief without practice (action) of US citizenships (persons) is differentiated:

–=–

Begin excerpt:

This is one of the most important lessons in this work. Please ensure full comprehension between these two very different “freedoms” before you proceed with this work. For as a citizenship of the United States, the attachment to your strawman as property under the law of persons only allows you to fall under the “freedom of religion” as a limited legal outlet of commercial franchise. In other words, “Religious Freedom” is against the law of the United States for its subjects (persons).

RELIGIOUS FREEDOMWithin constitution embraces not only the right to worship God according to the dictates of one’s conscience, but also the right to do, or forbear to do, any act, for conscience sake, the doing or forbearing of which is not inimical to the peace, good order, and morals of society. (Black4)

FREEDOM OF RELIGION – Embraces the concept of freedom to believe and freedom to act, the first of which (belief) is absolute, but the second of which (action) remains subject to regulation for protection of society. (Black4)

—=—

Now you tell me, what good is religious, moral belief if you are not allowed to act on it? To be clear, this state of confusion at bar is the very purpose of nations, to prevent self-governing, moral standing in men. For no moral man would allow a nation as this to continue in its abhorrent actions against God (Nature) and man. But the moral man is cowed and pacified by his surety to the law of his persona (false identity). We are so smitten and proud of our nationality, our personality in public that we don’t dare risk doing what is right in and under the Law of God. This is unmistakably and self-evidently the work of the devil (the attorney class) and his scribes.

These are completely separate definitions, on separate pages of the dictionary. They are not the same thing. As citizenships of the United States, you better damn well know the difference before proceeding herein, and before you try and act morally in a society that strictly forbids moral actions without license from the state.

Freedom of moral thought, but not freedom to act upon that conscious moral thought… This is what public, legal freedom (franchise) is when defined by the commercial gods — a legal corp-oration called government. It is not freedom of religion, but franchise of religion. These are as the rules set for employees (agents) by their employer (principal). This is not Natural freedom under God, which is described above as Religious Freedom. This is tyranny named (noun) as “freedom,” where the ability to practice religion is confounded and limited to the franchise it belongs to (of), as freedom (franchise) of (belonging to) religion (memberships to legal corporations, as the legal, anti-God definition of religion). In the United States, the lack of a moral standing in God’s Law (religious, spiritual Life) is the official state religion, as an enforced, amoral lack of It. Freedom is only a franchise allowed to fictional persons. Governments cannot control in totality your thought processes, only your actions (anti-pro-verb) while in its property. Specifically, we must recognize absolutely that the purpose of the legal law is to prevent man from acting upon his moral thoughts and beliefs. 

—=—

“No one is punished for his thoughts. 

—COGITATIONIS PAENAM NEMO PATITUR. Dig. 48, 19,18. (Black4)

—=—

It’s impossible to have religious freedom in any nation where churches are licensed to the government.

—Congressman George Hansen, quoted from “In Caesar’s Grip,” by Peter Kershaw

—=—

“The framers of our Constitution meant we were to have freedom of religion, not freedom from religion.

—Billy Graham

—=—

The legal realm acknowledges only written and spoken words. It is immune, so to speak, from religious and moral (unwritten) controls, as legalism and religious action are foreign to each other. Man is only punished for his actions, and when his actions are in the person of another, he is not acting according to his own moral thoughts of Law.

By providing the fictional, legally “natural” person (strawman) with an insurance bond for a man’s operation in that fictional, commercial realm, government ensures that each individual man will act collectively according to civil law and not according to his own religious and moral thoughts. This is the separation of mind from the body, the killing of the spirit (soul). For the law is attached to the person, and thus the man in the fictional chains of surety to that person is bound by the public law of persons. By acceptation of that person as a commercial vessel (a citizen-ship) in surety, man tacitly agrees and consents (through assent) to abide by the legal law in direct opposition to God’s Law while acting in that fictional persona. He literally agrees to use his Real body as insurance to ensure that he will operate in fiction (evil) according to strictly written law, and if he does not, the man in surety will be judged and punished for the incorrect use of that corporate strawman (property of government). Thus the man’s moral mind does not control his Self (his body), for the law of persons controls his mind and therefore his actions, where the legal persona acts as the surrogate or second self. This is a lack of True Self-respect.

—=—

“No man can enter into a strong man’s house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strong man (through legal personhood); and then he will spoil his house.”

“Or else how can one enter into a strong man’s house, and spoil his goods, except he first bind the strong man? (through legal personhood) and then he will spoil his house.”

—Matthew 12: 29, Mark 3: 27, KJB (added by author for this excerpt)

—=—

“My son, if thou be surety for thy friend, if thou hast stricken thy hand with a stranger, Thou art snared with the words of thy mouth, thou art taken with the words of thy mouth.

“Go to the ant, thou sluggard; consider her ways, and be wise: Which having no guide, overseer, or ruler, Provideth her meat in the summer, and gathereth her food in the harvest.”

—Proverbs 6: 1-2 and 6-8, KJB

—=—

This is the purpose and pretext of legal surety: insurance that the instigation of person-hood at birth into the nation will incite man’s actions to be in concordance with the legal law as opposed to being in respect of God’s Law and Nature. Incitement to evil acts without moral compass (direction). This is a binding relationship to fictional rulers under contractual terms (word magic), even by the shaking (striking) of hands. For a man’s feet never touch land while he sails his ship upon the virtual sea of that surety (security) of legal commercial fiction. The legal jurisdiction is an invisible, fictional barrier set upon Creation and its Law; a prophylactic barring man from his very own essence as part of that Oneness of Nature.

A fictional person simply cannot follow God’s Law, without exception, for a person is not a Creation of God. God bestows no status upon man but self-evidence. This untouchable essence of negativity towards any of man’s systems of positive law can never be taken away, though obviously we have been fooled into contractually selling those God-given attributes in exchange for fictional non-sense. A man acting in person is subject only to man’s utilitarian legal law of persons (status/condition), with strict prohibitions against God that we call as the doctrine of “freedom of religion.” Opposites attract. A man in public personhood does not need and is not expected to think in any way that is responsible or compos mentis, for the person is allowed only to follow man’s (its master’s) strict legal law when used by its autonomic user.

—=—

“This word ‘person’ and its scope and bearing in the law, involving, as it does, legal fictions and also apparently [IN APPEARANCE ONLY] natural beings, it is difficult to understand; but it is absolutely necessary to grasp, at whatever cost, a true and proper understanding to the word in all the phases of its proper use. A person is here not a physical or individual person, but the status or condition with which he is invested. Not an individual or physical person, but the status, condition or character borne (carried) by physical persons. 

The law of persons is the law of status or condition.

—American Law and Procedure, Vol. 13, page 137, 1910

—=—

End Excerpt.

–=–

The Law of God is just as strict as the legal law. It is impossible to Obey the Law of Nature while also obeying the legal law that is designed to be opposed to God’s Law in every way. Claiming anything from religious Law while in personhood under legal, civil law is at best foolishness and at worst insanity. And worshiping God while acting in legal persona is like holding up a cross in idolatry without faith. It will never actually happen.

Religious exemption is a lie, just like any other exemption. It only exists in the legal realm, nowhere else. And in Truth, if you qualify for any type of legal exemption, then you have already fallen into the legal trap. There is no exemption from Reality. There is no exemption from God’s Law. There is only choice, free will, and you must choose which Law to follow.

Exemption, to be clear, is a post-requisite. One can only be exempt from legal law because of whatever legal status one already obtained that allows for exemption. But in the end, a debt-slave is really exempt from nothing, for all legal exemptions can be revoked by the false god that bestowed that artificial, legal right in the first place. The exemption never existed in Reality, being a non-inherent, unnatural right to man, and so it has no religious Law protection. God protects no man that claims exemption from anything, because to claim exemption one must already claim to be agent for a legal entity. Only persons can claim exemption, not men.

A religious man in the True sense needs no exemption. He just says no. Exemption implies that some higher power exists and that the man is pretending to be under that power and authority instead of that of Nature’s Law. You don’t need exemption if you are not under the legal law of the false gods of government. It’s this Higher consciousness that is voided through legal, religious and conscientious exemption. That is, to claim legal exemption one must already be accustomed through brainwashing and public education to believe that government already has power over you as a man (Creation) of God, and in this case, that you are already required to be vaccinated  but currently, out of the good graces of the legal gods, have exemption from that legal duty to that government as a person (property) of it. A legal exemption is a claim against a legal thing. Filing a legal exemption is not protection against forced vaccination, it is a claim of artificial rights invented and bestowed upon a feudal tenant of government, which can be revoked or refused at any time for the protection, security, and continuity of government. You can exercise religious exemption while it is allowed my your master because it has nothing to do with True religion. But what you can’t do is practice religious faith to say no to vaccines by the power and authority of God (Nature).

The moral of this story is that unless you act morally, spiritually, and without legal persona, you have no actual inherent right of exemption, because there is no such thing in Nature (Reality). Exemption is a sign that one is in the lowest form of beggary, of slavery, of despotism, of employment (use as property), of dependence upon a legal, state-bestowed franchise of artificial freedom much like a rat in a cage. The power to say no comes not from legal words in the legal matrix code created by false gods. The power to say no comes only from following the Law of God (Truth), which absolutely forbids acting in and respecting other persons and flattering titles, especially the false gods of government. To be clear, if you are not a person, you cannot be forced to be vaccinated. But you cannot just merely claim not to be a person. It doesn’t work that way. Just ask any illegal alien. To act religiously is to obey God’s Law in its fullness. The state will not recognize a free man (son) of God unless that man is actually acting under and as a son of God, of the Law, without deviation, without depravation, without departing the faith (Law), and without defection.

Unfortunately, as the title of this writing appears to promise at first glance, there is no actual (True) religious exemption from vaccination. It’s a misnomer (misnamed). It’s like a magic spell (spelling), where the word and the reality do not jive, just as the entire legal language dresses up Truth with fiction and misdirection. The God-honest Truth is that if you want your children to remain free from these nurse and doctor-delivered vials of poison that induce fast and slow-growing autoimmune disease, you must leave Babylon and take your children with you. And that requires absolute Love and total sacrifice. The state has tricked you into claiming through birth registration the abandonment of your parental (Natural) rights, delivering (abandoning) your child into wardship and apprenticeship to the nation (as a goyim). We are all birthed through trickery into this legal matrix (artificial womb), like a roach motel, but never told how to escape, how to unplug from the addiction of legalism. The state calls every child (and adult) as property through legal person-hood. In order for that to happen, it must trick you into that abandonment. It must cause you to be confused as to what it is for a child to be an actual property of the parent. No, a child is never a piece of property, as the legal realm attempts to establish through attachment of persona (legal identity/status). Belief that the person is the man (i.e. a child) is key, for identity means sameness in law. In other words, we are all tricked into believing that the person is the same as the man, a logical fallacy of monumental, Biblical proportions.

In Nature (God’s Realm), the word property is not connotative of possession as it is in legalese, but rather refers to Source. Origin. Truth. Natural connection. Family. Like hydrogen is a property of water and water is a property of Earth and Earth a property of the Universe (God), your child is a property (part) of your own Existence, and therefore a property of God’s Creation (the Universe), being a carrier of your blood (figurative, spiritual immortality, bloodline). The child’s blood is a property (ingredient) reflective of its parents (procreation). Not legal property, which is always a lie, but actual property which is a self-evident Truth. We were all tricked into selling those God-given, Natural rights of paternity, fooled into believing that the source of our God-given Natural rights are our own, not a property of God.

Self-ownership without God (Source) is the grand, communist delusion of the ages, where men believe that all inherent rights extend from man, not God, and therefore the Law of God can be bypassed by the selling of those rights in exchange for legal ones, entering the fictional construct of the legal matrix by pretending to abandon Nature (God) and Its Law. Yet in Nature (under God) we can never actually be spiritually defeated unless we choose (volunteer) to, for we never actually leave God, a self-evident Truth which the Bible states that God (Nature and Its Highest Law) never leaves our side if we choose and act in It. In Truth, we cannot Exist or Live without Source, without being a property of God (Nature) and Its Law. But we pretend that the self-evident Truth of Existence (God) doesn’t exist, that God doesn’t exist, and therefore that the power and authority (Law) of God (Nature) doesn’t exist. The status (persona) of legalism merely clouds the Truth with a lie, but the Truth cannot ever die, for no legal fiction exists without claiming some Truth as its victim and host. The duty of parenthood is part of the Law of Nature, not a right. A DUTY TO GOD, not to the state. But the state tricks us into abandoning our God-given Duty by relabeling and calling it a “legal right” that can be imaginarily transferred as a legal property, a fictional title. And we believe this lie so fervently that we are willing to allow the agents of the legalized state (corporation) to literally steal our True property (child) from our homes, without a fight, based on its assumed, mistaken legal identity — by a name that is not God-given.

But hey, who wants to give up that free public babysitting called education. After all, your lifestyle of free leisure time and employment are way more important than that of your health and that of your child, right? And everybody knows that the pursuit of happiness requires the pursuit of money, the root of all evil, right? Of course, your love of money is way more powerful and important than the health of yourself or your child, which is why the legal system runs on money, and why government is the printer, copywriter, lawmaker, enforcer, and banker of money, resting its whole international identity on the false valuation and respect of the evil that money represents. And that’s why, when government soon fulfills the already written requirement that all legal persons (citizenships) of the United States and other nations of goyim must be vaccinated, you will voluntarily and without hope take that poison as a mark that you are a beast of that legal system, that your love of money is more powerful than the love of your child, than your love or purity, than your love of God, and that you are indeed a Godless human without the ability to self-govern and use the gift of Free Will that God gave you. And your children’s children will follow in your weak and defeated example, that is, if the vaccines you allowed them to be tainted with don’t sterilize or destroy them as they’re designed to do.

But by all means, continue in this lunacy of trying to protect the legally bestowed religious exemption of fictional persons as if its already your own inherent right and not just an inconvenient leftover of the legalist thought of some damned outdated, idealistic moral inclusion by some past, slave-holding, false god.

No really, do as though wilt. That’s what they want, as long as it’s legal, and as long as you never actually act out based on any religious, moral thought. Think about it all you want, just don’t act on it without permission, licensing, and an approved, raised corporate seal under tax section 501.

If you want religious exemption, start acting religiously, and stop acting legally. Because using a legal persona is like wearing a condom… the legal persona is a prophylactic to Truth (God). You’ve no access to the Law of Nature, of Truth, from the fictional disposition of a legal (anti-God) persona. And that includes the actual moral choice you seek through legal “religious” exemption.

Heck, that’s such a simple concept that your kids will probably get it faster than you can. And you know what? If you are using your kids as an excuse, don’t. They can adjust way easier than you can to giving up the legal fiction. They’ll be much happier in Nature. They won’t be spoiled anymore. And they won’t suffer from the public school, Common Core blues.

It’s all on you, not them. You are their parent and protector. Start acting like it. It’s your God-given duty, and choice regarding such a Duty to God and to your child is a legally induced illusion for parents. You cannot shirk your responsibility and then pretend to have the very parental power you abandoned through legal birth certification and registration. You made a grevious error based on generational ignorance. Fix it or accept your own chosen, voluntary fate. Find God or remain in abandonment to your Source. Be a Natural and self-Existent property of God or remain a legal property of the state. And to fix the status of your child (property), which can only be a reflection of your own status, then you must first fix your own. You must be the one to sacrifice your false, secular lifestyle and perceived monetary wealth (mammon) therein, as the Bible tells you, crucifying it (the legal, fictional person) so as to be free and self-governing under the Highest Law. For a slave can never elevate its own issue (offspring) higher in law than his or her own legal status. A debt-slave can only bear another debt-slave, for status of an issue (property) depends upon the status of source. You cannot make gold from iron.

Or keep on pretending this knowledge doesn’t exist as you have your whole life. After all, a lifestyle of blatant hypocrisy in the legal matrix ain’t so bad… But I guarantee that it will require vaccination at some point.

The truth is, when you actually become a religious man, in your actions, in your mind body and soul, you won’t need any exemption. You won’t need to dodge bullets because they don’t exist except in the legal fiction matrix, and they can only harm the legal person of those men acting in agency and therefore in bond and surety to those legal persons, not men (sons) of God. The law of the legal matrix simply wouldn’t apply to you, because it’s finally beneath you and you refuse to plug in to any of its properties. You would, by your True religion, refuse to act in, believe in, or respect the persons, places, and things of the legal, commercial realm of mammon. You would see all things only as they really Exist, without artifice, without fiction, including those colored pieces of paper and their digital representations pretending to be money and credit/debt.

So please don’t send me any more inquiries about how to use legal exemptions against anything, unless you are first willing to fact the harsh Truth about your legally induced status (person-hood). I cannot help anyone that will not help themself. You seek legal power yet have none. It’s not Real, and neither, apparently, are you. Ironically, the power you seek Exists only in the Real, in that Realm of Nature and Its Law which you have voluntarily abandoned and continue to deny, that you continue to pretend to worship while wearing a spiritual condom (legal person), a fruitless effort that the Bible over and over tells you to avoid.

I’m sure your next question is how? How do I follow this seemingly impossible path back into Truth? Well, the answer is in the question. To Exist in Truth is to deny all lies, all fiction, all legalism, and all feigned power and delusion. The answers are laid out perfectly in the Bible, which provides metaphorical story after story to answer your questions. It’s why I wrote my book. I am not your judge, nor am I your guide or savior. You are. God (Nature/Truth) and Its Law is your destination, not some idol to worship falsely. But ignorance certainly guides no man of God, only lighting the path for the errands of fools.

Now you know.

Sorry to burst your bubble.

Not really.

.

–Clint richard-son (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Red Pill Sunday, August 25th, 2019

A Deconstruction Of The Death Of Christ: It’s Not What You Think


–=–

“But the natural (idiot/foolish) man receiveth not
the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him:
neither can he know [them], because they are spiritually discerned.”

–1 Corinthians 2:14

–=–

 

As a consummate Bible researcher nowadays, I am always looking for spiritual, reasonable explanations for the most unreasonable, ridiculous sounding of stories. There is, of course, a fine line between deciphering the absurd to find spiritual instruction and playing the fool. The king’s scribes were quite clever in their transliterations, leaving traps and pitfalls throughout the Crown’s copyrighted, English (dog-Latin) version. Some may take offense at the idea that I am calling the story of Christ’s death and resurrection as a somewhat ridiculous story, and to you otherwise reasonable people, I will simply offer to tell you why I say this over a glass of blood-turned wine along with Jonah inside the “whale’s” (translation sea monster’s) mouth aside a nice burning bush.

The ancient, well known, often utilized, and certainly well established Truth is that the more ridiculous an allegory or other moral story is portrayed, the more easily it is remembered. If you’ve ever bought one of those memory courses from a television infomercial as I did when I was a very young lad, you’ll find the same exact lesson on how ridiculousness supercharges the memory, complete with instructions on how to imagine the utmost ridiculous connections to different images in your head in order to remember a list of 100, or even 1,000 words. The stranger the image or description and correlation of those words in order, the more memorable that list becomes. Indeed, in trying to memorize cold a list of irrelevant words, I could not, my mind able to recite merely a few, out of order, and without coherent purpose. But when I applied the rules of ridiculousness, that is, when I followed the instructions and correlated the words as a continuous, absolutely absurd set of details in a story of my own imagination,  I was amazingly able to remember lists of 100 or more words, in order, by simply connecting each word as instructed. For example, if the first word is elephant and the second word is umbrella, I was instructed to imagine the most silly looking of elephants, complete with concerned expression and a polka-dotted leotard, that is holding an umbrella. And if the third word was then turtle, then I would imagine the elephant in the ridiculous leotard holding the umbrella up against falling turtles, themselves having something odd about them. If the forth word was water, then I would imagine the turtles doing an awesome 360 flip and while diving into the ocean, or if it were sunglasses, then of course the turtles would be sporting some shades. And so it went, word after totally unrelated word, placed by my mind into the most ridiculous of loosely linked, situational absurdities. And sure enough, as I pictured these things in my mind, I was able to spout off that list of words with hardly any effort at all, because who could resist that silly elephant holding an umbrella so as not to get hit by the falling turtles that were diving into the ocean with sunglasses, etc. etc.

When I consider all the True life stories I’ve heard over the years, as I am sure the reader would agree, again I find that I remember the most outlandish, ridiculous, or even most violent ones most often. I find myself telling stories about these events, and usually I do so because of their ridiculousness, their humor, or their horror. Comedians make whole stand-up routines based on such ridiculous stories, turning them into jokes that may or may not be true… but they sure are memorable. And of course we remember certain jokes because they are funny, and they are funny because they are absurd or even impossible in Nature. Perhaps they are embarrassing, or they remind us of something close to home or a personal experience. Whatever the case, we are wired to remember the most bizarre shit. We remember the harshness of violence, experiencing post traumatic stress, as another example. If I were to ask anyone where they were on 9/11/2001, they could probably tell me in detail, simply because what they really remember is a link between the out-of-place absurdity of watching the World Trade Centers burning and falling on television, because such an absurdity was in the background on every television screen, everywhere, making whatever one was doing that day stand out. In fact, when prompted to speak about that horrific event, many of us specifically reference whatever mundane task we were preforming and whatever usual place we were lingering. But if I were to ask anyone where they were three days before their 27th birthday, they most likely would have no clue. Why? No association. No correlation. No event to remember. No story to tell. Whatever stands out about the event, the story, the happenstance, and specifically the ridiculousness of the situation, the more memorable it is. It’s like a filter in the mind, where the details of what is considered as normal or routine are lost in the shuffle, but where learnable or unique moments shine through, teaching and preparing us for the future. After all, there’s a psychological reason why shock-jocks are so unwittingly popular and why news outlets have “breaking news” and cover certain stories for weeks at a time, 24 hours a day.

Entertainments are the same way. The more scary, the more ridiculous, the more fantastical, the more memorable they are. For how can one explain what does not exist, say in science fiction or fantasy, without a deep impression of that non-existent thing to the point of being able to picture it in ones mind? Yet most of us (I hope) can still distinguish between reality and fantasy. In other words, after seeing a fictional movie, we do not believe in those false, computer-enhanced images as what is actually real or as history. That would be Idolatry. And, I’m sorry and happy to say, religions are no exception to this rule.

Why are all the stories of the gods of all the cultures so ridiculous? Why are the gods tyrannical, manipulative monsters with multiple heads or some other superpower or supernatural attribute? From Zeus to the Babylonian creation story, these tales are physically, scientifically, and logically impossible to believe. Yet we remember them, don’t we? Many insist they are to be taken as literally True, as the Word of God, ironically and in idolatry assigning supernatural qualities to the God of Nature, while completely loosing the moral teaching intended through that ridiculousness. And I agree, they are the Word of God (Truth)… but only if you are taking them as the metaphor and moral story they are meant to be understood as. They are mythical because myth is memorable. All civilizations, all countries and nations, all religions, are built upon their own ridiculous myths about those that founded or formed them. Without the mythology of the founding fathers, there would be no purpose behind the United States, and certainly no reason to support what it has morphed into in modern times — a simulacra (a copy having nothing to do with its original) desperately promoting that patriot mythology as its reason for its post-modern existence. If Zeus was a librarian that had no authority, that shuffled books around all day without any other adventure or purpose, what could we possibly learn as his moral story? What would be memorable about his godliness?

The problem is that, while we remember the story, we often don’t remember or were never taught the point behind the ridiculous, impossible-to-be-True story. We are never told the moral lesson of the allegory. And so we take it literally, which in our minds causes the story to become historical “fact” instead of learning from the story (pretended history). We mistake facts with Truths. For instance, it is a fact that Han Solo and Chewbacca are ship-mates. But did you know it’s a fact that they are also lifelong friends? These are facts, in fiction. But they are not Truths. They are not the Word of God. There are many facts used to tell the story of the Law, that is, of the Word of God. Yet the Word (moral Law) is often lost behind belief in the facts, which aren’t Truths, only tools to cause Truth to shine. And often those facts are ridiculous, causing memory association. But as the Bible quote above suggests, the fool may not discern spiritual Truths because the fool is too busy trying to prove or disprove the facts, trying to prove the history instead of learning from it. It is foolish to believe that the purpose of the stories (mythos) of any history is to establish fact. Only the elite do this, and only to prove their power positions over the common people. These historical facts are institutional lies that justify completely unjustifiable rulers, which would have no purpose or reason behind their otherwise totally illegitimate rule if it weren’t for the established, embellished, generally bullshit historical fact they force us to learn in their public schools and institutions. And the only reason we fall for these so-called histories is because we forget their purpose their reason, their intention. We take them as literal instead of make-believe. We allow the most ridiculous events, like 9-11, to be used as historical facts in their justification for completely immoral, illegitimate, tyrannical laws to be passed against us. And we consider those laws somehow as truths instead of the prima facie (on their face) facts they actually are. We consider what is totally avoidable as that which is unavoidable, simply because we are tricked by their supposed factual history of inventions instead of learning from them. We don’t emulate the founding fathers in their dissent from the king, we treat them as gods, as the reason why their great grandchildren continue to rule the illegitimate United States corporation, which didn’t even exist until after those founding fathers (gods) were dead. In other words, prima facie means that these legal terms and laws are all facts as long as nobody questions their legitimacy, which is the description of every government. Corrupt men that seek power all have this trait in common — they turn the moral lessons meant to be learned by the retelling of history into the evidence of why they should be rulers. They turn myth into fact, and force it to be labeled and considered by fools as Truth.

Judging by the amount of narcissism taking place nowadays, I’d say the point of the story of Narcissus has been lost, for example. Perhaps they’ll name a cell phone camera model or selfie app after that unfortunate character of mythology? Or perhaps the story of the modern Narcissist must be rewritten to reflect the idiotic “accidents” taking place so often, as people walk off of cliffs while filming themselves doing so, even as they fall to their death on the craggy rocks below. Perhaps the myth of the Lemmings may need to be rewritten for these post-modern times, where those cute, cuddly creatures walk off the cliff with cell phones in their paws?

We may watch and enjoy movies like Clash of the Titans or Lord of the Rings without coming away from the story with its actual purpose for being told — the moral lesson. Unfortunately, the story of Jesus Christ and his death and resurrection are no different. When taken literally, as a purely historical event, the point of christ’s death is completely lost. It serves no purpose. It becomes an excuse instead of a cause. The moral takeaway and lesson of the life and death of Christ today for most “Christians” is just about as dead as that of the Greek gods.

In this study, I’d like to show you the exact place in the Bible where the spiritual, moral reason behind this story of Christ is explained. But first we have to understand what was the Babylonian, Mosaic tradition of animal and human sacrifice before the Christ (New Law) became the metaphoric, spiritual replacement for the literal sacrificial lamb.

PASCHAL – adjective – [Latin pascha.] Pertaining to the passover, or to Easter. (–Webster’s Dictionary of the English language, 1828)

PASSOVER – noun – [pass and over.] A feast of the Jews, instituted to commemorate the providential escape of the Hebrews, in Egypt, when God smiting the first-born of the Egyptians, passed over the houses of the Israelites, which were marked with the blood of the paschal lamb. 1. The sacrifice offered at the feast of the passover. (–Webster’s Dictionary of the English language, 1828)

EASTER – noun – A festival of the christian church observed in commemoration of our Savior’s resurrection. It answers to the pascha or passover of the Hebrews, and most nations still give it this name, pascha, pask, paque. (–Webster’s Dictionary of the English language, 1828)

–=–

Think these are the same holidays? Have you been told that Easter and Passover are similar in their celebrative purpose? It’s a lie. Don’t believe it. The story of Easter is designed to replace the Babylonian (i.e. Jewish) story of Passover just as the New Testament is meant to replace the Old. In other words, the sacrifice of the “Son of God” is designed to replace the sacrifice of animals to the Babylonian gods. The New Testament is designed not to eliminate but to fulfill the Old.

–=–

“Ever since the New Testament, the paschal lamb has been interpreted as prefiguring Jesus. In subsequent centuries, Church Fathers and later clergy taught that Jesus was the lamb of God, the new Passover sacrificeThe Christian who is quoted or paraphrased in Sefer Nitztzahon Yashan makes the curious argument: the difficulty of offering any rational reason for the details of the paschal sacrifice in Exodus 12 provesthat the text requires an allegorical explanation, and it must be an allegory about Jesus. This seems to have led Jews to work harder to prove that, on the literal level, the rules were meaningful, not arbitrary… Modern biblical scholars also struggle with the meaning of the ritual and the significance of these details, typically using anthropological tools to understand it, and suggesting that most of these rituals did not originate with a historical first Passover… Such is the nature of allegorical explanations. Christians claimed that the allegory was about Jesus, but there was nothing to stop another allegorist from giving a totally different explanation, in this case, that it was about the Jewish people as a whole.”

–Prof. Rabbi Martin Lockshin, excerpted from ‘Searching for the Meaning of the Passover Sacrifice, The need for medieval exegetes to suggest a plausible alternative to the Christian exegesis of this ritual’

–=–

The problem? Here we have an allegory trying desperately to be proven as a history. Happens all the time. Again, the fool completely misses the spiritual lesson, because to the fool, the spiritual lesson is foolishness, and the spiritual coldness and irrelevance of history and scientific proofs are paramount.

Now, before you get all bent out of shape because of some pseudo-religious belief that the modern conceptualization of “science” as the new, replacement-for-Christ savior of men is the holy grail of the atheist (fool) and the logician, hold your horses just a moment and think about what I’m saying here. Because this question is a very reasonable one that can easily and even scientifically be answered: can science be applied to the Bible? In other words, can science discern the moral value and intent from an allegorical story or mythological history? Can science be used to prove or disprove an allegory, a metaphor, an aphorism, a moral equivalent, or a mythology? Of course it can’t. What a fool one must be to attempt to apply science to a book of moral stories and inherent Laws intended as that which is not even in the realm of scientific observation! Shall we use science to examine whether or not Little Miss Muffet truly sat on a Tuffet, searching desperately through historical ruins to prove said tuffet and the girl that sat on it actually existed? Shall we merely take at its word the story of Mary and her supposedly little lamb and that its fleece was apparently white as snow? Was Wilber really “Some Pig” as Charlotte the Black Widow claims him to be, or was he just another side of bacon waiting to happen? You must understand that this is not a pro- or anti- science argument, but rather just a case where science isn’t even part of the topic. It simply isn’t necessary or relevant to the purpose and intent of the Bible as a moral teaching tool to invoke scientific methods. Spirituality and moral behavior is not a scientific subject. And it’s utterly ridiculous to attempt to try and prove or disprove the Bible’s allegorical, metaphorical nature with the tools of science. Perhaps the fact that this idea is so ridiculous is why it has caught on with such fervor among non-thinking fools. Yet one must ask such a purveyor of scientific proofs for allegorical stories this question: which is more ridiculous and unscientific, the Bible stories themselves, or trying to prove or disprove those moral stories with science? LOL! Why would anyone attempt to bring science into a moral discussion? Unless, perhaps, one wishes to purposefully confuse the very intent and purpose of the Bible’s allegorical mythos and moral lessons with some “factual” or “scientifically provable” history (an oxymoron) that never actually happened so as to justify whatever it is they call themselves… kings, priests, popes, magistrates, judges, jews, Christians, or just good old false gods?

The moral of this story is that morals cannot be proven by science. They are not of the same realm. That is to say that spiritual thought and action are not and cannot be scientifically justified. Inversely, there is no spirituality in science, for True science seeks only to understand Nature Itself, not decipher its spiritual meaning. Attempting to apply science to the Bible is like applying spiritual morals to a spiritless machine. It just doesn’t work. Yet, it certainly works to confuse and confound most people from understanding the Bible. In that way, science may very well, in the end, triumph over the minds of men and destroy our collective spirit.

You see, If the bible can be made into an artificially “factual” history (fact) instead of an allegory (moral Truth) in the minds of Christians… oh, wait, that’s already happened. That’s the purpose of legal corporations that in their corporate charters call themselves by differing, anti-Biblical, empty, denominational religious names. And each one has a history of its own. The Methodists have their founding father, John Wesley. The Catholics have their replacement (anti) God and vicar of christ, the Pope. The 7th Day Adventists have their very recent history of Ellen White and John Nevins Andrews, their own founding fathers. The Baptists founding father in Amsterdam was John Smyth, with John Clark or Roger Williams in America. Mormons have their bizarre history and replacement Christ in Joseph Smith, while scientology was apparently invented by L. Ron Hubbard, a science fiction author, after he made a bet between fellow high profile sci-fi writers over a poker game that Hubbard could not start a new, successful religion of his own. All religions have their histories, that is, their “facts” that are used to justify their own false, corporate doctrines. Nevermind the repeated warnings of the Bible that we should call no man as “father” nor take any other doctrine (law) but that of the Bible.

And that brings us back to the allegory of the passover…

Let us be clear that this so-called Jewish holiday, that of the celebration of the “pass-over” or paschal (lamb) sacrifice, was not the physical, literal killing or slaughtering of all the first born human sons and animals. That’s too ridiculous even for the Bible. But the consideration of it, that of the killing of children, was a powerful metaphorical conception that certainly did represent the taking away of the right of what is called primogeniture. This concept of law is not a physical attribute but a status, otherwise known in law as being the firstborn. And so we can quite fully understand the purpose of this allegory of the passover by simply understanding manmade law of the time, and therefore the purpose of putting to metaphoric death that spiritual status, that is, a right of succession.

PRIMOGENETUREnoun – 1. The state of being the firstborn child‘Maui and Tahaki are famous mythological heroes in Polynesia and they have more powerful manas than their elder brothers, though they are not the primogenitures.’ After the sin the primogenitures lost their privilege of serving in the Holy Temple and it was given to the Levites, who had abstained from the sin.’ 1.1 The right of succession belonging to the firstborn child, especially the feudal rule by which the whole real estate of an intestate passed to the eldest son(–Oxford Lexico.com Dictionary online)

PRIMOGENETURE – A historical term that refers to the rights and responsibilities of the first-born child among siblings in a family. When used in the legal sense, the term is used to discuss the right of the eldest son in the family to inherit his parents’ estate upon their death. The initial purpose of determining primogeniture was to keep an estate from being divided among siblings. When this was done, a parcel of land would continue to get smaller and smaller, which reduced the value of the overall property. To explore this concept, consider the following primogeniture definition.”

PRIMOGENETURE – (noun) – The state of being the firstborn child in the family. The system of inheritance or succession of the firstborn child, especially the eldest son

PRIMOGENETURE LAW – Primogeniture law historically determined that the first-born son among all of a couple’s children would inherit his parents’ entire estate upon their deaths. The purpose of this was so that the parcel of land would not end up being so subdivided that the value of each individual parcel would plummet. The term “primogeniture” was implied to refer to male children. If there were no male heirs, then primogeniture law determined that the property would be divided up among the daughters in equal shares. Primogeniture law actually hails from feudal England, and does not exist in the United States. (–Legal dictionary online, at https://legaldictionary.net)

–=–

Perhaps it slipped your mind that there happened to be no female children smitten by God (Jehovah) on that day of passover? Now, allegorically and legally, you know why. They simply were not male, and so not considered by law as “firstborn” and therefore had no right of primogeniture to put to figurative death. Disclaimer: No female children were harmed during the making of this allegory. This is what you might call as a big tell…

–=–

“And it came to pass, that at midnight the LORD (Jehovah) smote all the firstborn in the land of Egypt, from the firstborn of Pharaoh that sat on his throne unto the firstborn of the captive that was in the dungeon; and all the firstborn of cattle.” (–Exodus 12:29, KJB).
–=–

Only the “firstborn” (primogeniture) were “smote” by Jehovah. In other words, the right of succession to God’s Kingdom was allegorically usurped. This, by law and custom, and therefore by default, necessarily did not include any female children, which were never considered as firstborn. Again, it was the status of inheritable blood that was made figuratively dead, not the actual life of the child. Yet the blood-right remained (was saved) with the children of the Israelites, who escaped the “destroyer” of the “firstborn,” this word destroyer being a translation of the word shachath, which specifically means “moral corruption, rot, ruin, spoliation, perversion, or to be marred or marked (by evil/immorality).”” Yes, the destroyer (of spirituality and Truth) put to death all the “firstborn” male children (heirs), but this was a figurative, spiritual death, not a literal, physical one.

It is also very important not to confuse the “Jews” with the Israelites. These terms are not the same. The Israelites were men that followed the Law of God, that is, the Christ (Logos) as Law. The Jews (יְהוּדִי – Yĕhuwdiy; or Ἰουδαῖος, Ioudaios), were specifically defined as:

“The apostle John, inasmuch as agreeably to the state of things in his day he looked upon the Jews as a body of men hostile to Christianity, with whom he had come to see that both he and all true Christians had nothing in common as respects religious matters, even in his record of the life of Jesus not only himself makes a distinction between the Jews and Jesus, but ascribes to Jesus and his apostles language in which they distinguish themselves from the Jews, as though the latter sprang from an alien race: John 11:8; John 13:33. And those who (not only at Jerusalem, but also in Galilee, cf. John 6:41, 52) opposed his divine Master and his Master’s causeespecially the rulers, priests, members of the Sanhedrin, Pharisees — he does not hesitate to style οἱ Ἰουδαῖοι, since the hatred of these leaders exhibits the hatred of the whole nation toward Jesus: John 1:19; John 2:18, 20; John 5:10, 15ff,John 5:18; John 6:41,52; 7:1,11,13; 9:18,22; 10:24,31,33; 18:14.” (–Strong’s Concordance #G2453 entry, quoting THAYER’S GREEK LEXICON)

–=–

Hmm… sounds a lot like secular Israel and the worldwide, mostly atheistic jews (Ἰουδαῖοιof today, despite their masterful infiltration and blinding of Christian churches throughout the world.

Oh, but surely Christians and Jews can live together in harmony under the same Law, right? A Christian-Jewish Alliance? Forget the Bible, you’re racist if you don’t think so. That’s scientifically proven by the propaganda arm of the ADL!

As the Exodus story explains, it was the status of being firstborn (primogeniture), a legally recognized and spiritually induced (blood-right) status, that was in title only taken away from the Egyptians, including even Pharaoh’s own firstborn son (heir), whereas the firstborn of the Israelites (not jews) had their God-given rights preserved. God (Jehovah) figuratively passed over them in his taking away of the right of inheritance to God’s Kingdom, for they were not followers of the Law of Nature (God), that is, they did not respect the metaphoric lamb of God (Jesus Christ/Logos). But to understand this story the metaphor must be applied. Remember, this is not Clint’s opinion, this is defined straight out of the concordances and lexicons for the Bible. And this is just one of many hundreds of examples of the term death being used figuratively, meaning spiritual death, and signifying a loss of inheritance and access to God’s Law to defeat man’s.

All in all, the event is not even a religious one. In other words, it has nothing to do with religion, but is strictly an allegorical understanding of the law of inheritance and status as it applies to the Law of Nature (Christ).

The Egyptians and the Jews were, of course, idolators. They worshiped the false (untrue, unnatural), Babylonian gods. In other words, they did not worship and obey Truth (Nature) and Its Law. And so their horrific sacrifices were also made to idols (false gods).

Idol – Strong’s #G1497 – eidōlon

εἴδωλον, εἰδώλου, τό (εἶδος (cf. Winers Grammar, 96 (91); Etym. Magn. 296, 9)), in Greek writings from Homer down, an image, likeness, i. e. whatever represents the form of an object, either real or imaginary; used of the shades of the departed (in Homer), of apparitions, spectres, phantoms of the mind, etc.; in Biblical writings (an idol, i. e.):

1. the image of a heathen god: Acts 7:41; 1 Corinthians 12:2; Revelation 9:20 (Isaiah 30:22; 2 Chronicles 23:17, etc.; θεῶν ἤ δαιμον´ων εἴδωλα, Polybius 31, 3, 13);

2. a false god: Acts 15:20 (on which see ἀλίσγημα); Romans 2:22; 1 Corinthians 8:4, 7; 1 Corinthians 10:19; 2 Corinthians 6:16; 1 Thessalonians 1:9 (often in the Sept.); φυλάσσειν ἑαυτόν ἀπό τῶν εἰδώλων, to guard oneself from all manner of fellowship with heathen worship, (1 John 5:21).

–=–

Take the partaking (artificial sacrifice) of those little, corporately mass-produced, shitty-tasting little wafers and processed (unnatural), corporately manufactured grape (artificial) juice in church as a pretended “flesh” eating and “blood” drinking. What ever might the Bible say about that?

–=–

As concerning therefore the eating of those things that are offered in sacrifice unto idols, we know that an idol (G1497is nothing in the world, and that there is none other God but one… Howbeit there is not in every man that knowledge: for some with conscience of the idol (G1497) unto this hour eat it as a thing offered unto an idol; and their conscience being weak is defiled.”

—1 Corinthians 8: 4,7, KJB

–=–

“And were all baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea; And did all eat the same spiritual meat; And did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock was Christ.

—1 Corinthians 10: 2-4

–=–

Be not carried about with divers and strange doctrines. For it is a good thing that the heart be established with grace; not with meats, which have not profited them that have been occupied therein.”

—Hebrews 13: 9, KJB

–=–

Not only does the New Law of God (Christ) state not to worship or sacrifice idols, it also tells you that your meats should be spiritual, not worldly. And, of course, we find here one of many warnings not to follow strange doctrines, which basically is a reference to all modern, so-called “Christian” religions (worldly, secular corporations) and their useless, worldly ceremonies and rituals. The Bible is clear never to worship God in any of man’s false traditions, or in other words, never worship or pray to God through any artificial (manmade) invention.

Astoundingly, due to the stark ignorance of today’s populations in all nations, the planned reinvention and construction of the idol of the “Third Temple” reinvoking the Old, Babylonian law is under way. Here we find again blatant, and in my opinion purposeful, willful ignorance of the metaphoric, allegoric nature of the Biblical stories of the first two temples therein. This third temple can, according to the Bible, only stand and represent idolatry at its worst. Over and over we read that God’s Kingdom is not found in anything built by the hands of men. God’s Realm is Creation, not the resourced recreation of men. Therefore, any temple or other corporate church building is an idol, and every religion is necessarily a false, reinvented doctrine designed and incorporated (made legal under man’s false law) to misalign and replace God’s Law (doctrine) as told in Biblical allegory. The True Christian has no religion but that of unwaveringly following the example of Jesus Christ without artifice, s the personification of Logos (the Law of the Universe). And that just doesn’t include anything built by the hands (or minds) of men. For the Law of Nature, the Law of God, is self-Evident, self-Existent, as all of Nature and the Universe is, not an invention of man.

But in modern, Zionist-Jewish thought, from one Rabbi HaRav Avraham Yitzchak HaCohen Kook, the First Ashkenazi Chief Rabbi of Israel, revered and famed Torah sage, philosopher, writer, poet, iconic and beloved leader of religious Zionism and the return to Zion (1865-1935), is as expected completely foreign and opposed to Christ (God’s Law of Nature), using logical fallacy to promote pointless animal slaughter as idol sacrifice:

Will There be Sacrifices in the Third Temple?

Rav Kook’s views on the Temple service are sometimes misconstrued. A superficial reading of a passage in Olat Re’iyah (vol. I, p. 292) indicates that only grain offerings will be offered in the reinstated Temple service. To properly understand Rav Kook’s approach, it is necessary to read a related essay from Otzarot HaRe’iyah.]

What will the rebuilt Temple be like? Will we really offer animal sacrifices once again?

Protecting Animals

Some people object to the idea of sacrifices out of concern for the welfare of animals. However, this objection contains a measure of hypocrisy. Why should compassion for animals only be expressed with regard to humanity’s spiritual needs? If our opposition to animal slaughter is based not on weakness of character, but on recognition of the issue’s fundamental morality, then our first step should be to outlaw the killing of animals for food, clothing, and other material benefits.

In the world’s present state, the human race is weak, both physically and morally. The hour to protect animal life has not yet arrived. We still need to slaughter animals for our physical needs, and human morality requires that we maintain clear boundaries to distinguish between the relative value of human and animal life.

At this point in time, to advocate the protection of animals in our service of God is disingenuous. Is it moral to permit cruelty towards animals for our physical needs, yet forbid their use for our spiritual service, in sincere recognition and gratitude for God’s kindness? If our dedication and love for God can be expressed – at its highest level – with our willingness to surrender our own lives and die al kiddush Hashem, sanctifying God’s name, then certainly we should be willing to forgo the life of animals for this sublime goal…

Hints to the Future

Even in the current reality, we may feel uncomfortable about killing animals. This does not mean that the time for full animal rights has already arrived. Rather, these feelings come from a hidden anticipation of the future that is already ingrained in our souls, like many other spiritual aspirations.

Hints of these future changes may be found in the text of the Torah itself. Thus, it says that offerings are slaughtered on the northern side of the altar. Why this side? The north traditionally represents that which is incomplete and lacking, as it is written, “Out of the north, the evil shall break forth” (Jeremiah 1:14). In other words, the need to slaughter animals is a temporary concession to life in an incomplete world.

Furthermore, the Torah stipulates that sacrifices must be slaughtered “lirtzonchem” – “willingly”(Lev. 19:5). The Temple service must correspond to our needs and wants. As the Talmud in Erchin21a explains, one must be able to say, “I want to bring this offering.” When the slaughter of animals is no longer generally acceptable to society, this condition will not be fulfilled.

Finally, the Torah describes a person offering an animal sacrifice as “adam” (Lev. 1:2). This word indicates our current state of moral decline, a result of the unresolved sin of Adam, the first man. An individual offering a grain offering, on the other hand, is called “nefesh,” or “soul” (Lev. 2:1). The word nefesh implies a deeper, more essential level of humanity, independent of any temporary failings.

(Excerpt from: Arutz Sheva 7, IsraelNationalNews.com – quoting from Gold from the Land of Israel pp. 173-176. Adapted from Otzarot HaRe’iyah, vol. II, pp. 101-103; Olat Re’iyah vol. I, p. 292, sent to Arutz Sheva by Rabbi Chanan Morrison, RavKookTorah.org)

–=–

Read that again, would ya?

This blatant, temple-based return to the idolatry of the Babylonian, Mosaic Old Law should be a frightening nightmare to any moral man, yet we find the entirety of the so-called “Christian” religions brainwashed to be in praise and service to this Biblically defined, anti-Christ brood. This is the ultimate in antichrist rhetoric and action. This is literally the undoing of the allegory and purpose of the Christ story. This is the killing of Jesus Christ, in other words, the destruction of the New Testament Law (Law of Nature) and the reinstatement of the Old, secular Babylonian law. To be antichrist is to be against God’s Law, the New Testament, as exemplified by the allegory (example) of Christ. This is the very definition of the biblical word Jew, as we read above. It’s what all Christians should expect from Jews, again, as defined in the Bible. It’s their reason for existence, to defeat what they call openly as the false savior, Jesus Christ (New Law). This has nothing to do with race, or opinion, and everything to do with moral, spiritual consciousness toward Jehovah (Nature), that is, God’s Creation and Its Law.

And so we come, in the Bible, to where the reasoning behind this turning point from the law of men under Babylon and its false gods to the Law of Nature is explained, as the emergence of the New Law (Testament) based on the allegory of Jesus Christ. The purpose behind the Christ allegory, that is, the personification (story) of Jesus Christ as a man following the Law of Nature (Jehovah), was quite eloquently authored to replace the Babylonian hell of these idolators and their bloody, sacrificial rituals to false gods. This was made quite clear in the 9th chapter of Hebrews:

Heb 9:1 – Then verily the first covenant had also ordinances of divine service, and a worldly sanctuary.

Heb 9:2 – For there was a tabernacle made; the first, wherein was the candlestick, and the table, and the shewbread; which is called the sanctuary.

Heb 9:3 – And after the second veil, the tabernacle which is called the Holiest of all; (Author’s note: see here that a building made by the hands of men is called the Holiest of all instead of that which is God or a Creation of God’s Nature. In other words, these temples were sanctuaries against Jehovah/Nature, not in support of It.)

Heb 9:4 – Which had the golden censer, and the ark of the covenant overlaid round about with gold, wherein was the golden pot that had manna, and Aaron’s rod that budded, and the tables of the covenant;

Heb 9:5 – And over it the cherubims of glory shadowing the mercy seat; of which we cannot now speak particularly.

Heb 9:6 – Now when these things were thus ordained, the priests went always into the first tabernacle, accomplishing the service of God.

Heb 9:7 – But into the second went the high priest alone once every year, not without blood, which he offered for himself, and for the errors of the people:

Heb 9:8 – The Holy Ghost this signifying, that the way into the holiest of all was not yet made manifest, while as the first tabernacle was yet standing:

Heb 9:9 – Which was a figure (idol) for the time then present, in which were offered both gifts and sacrifices, that could not make him that did the service perfect, as pertaining to the conscience;

Heb 9:10 – Which stood only in meats and drinks, and divers washings, and carnal ordinances, imposed on them until the time of reformation.

Heb 9:11 – But Christ being come an high priest of good things to come, by a greater and more perfect tabernacle, not made with hands, that is to say, not of this building (idol);

Heb 9:12 – Neither by the blood of goats and calves, but by his own blood he entered in once into the holy place, having obtained eternal redemption for us.

Heb 9:13 – For if the blood of bulls and of goats, and the ashes of an heifer sprinkling the unclean, sanctifieth to the purifying of the flesh:

Heb 9:14 – How much more shall the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself without spot to God, purge your conscience from dead works to serve the living God?

Heb 9:15 – And for this cause he is the mediator of the new testament, that by means of death, for the redemption of the transgressions that were under the first testament, they which are called might receive the promise of eternal inheritance.

Heb 9:16 – For where a testament is, there must also of necessity be the death of the testator.

Heb 9:17 – For a testament is of force after men are dead: otherwise it is of no strength at all while the testator liveth.

Heb 9:18 – Whereupon neither the first testament was dedicated without blood.

Heb 9:19 – For when Moses had spoken every precept to all the people according to the law, he took the blood of calves and of goats, with water, and scarlet wool, and hyssop, and sprinkled both the book, and all the people,

Heb 9:20 – Saying, This is the blood of the testament which God hath enjoined unto you.

Heb 9:21 – Moreover he sprinkled with blood both the tabernacle, and all the vessels of the ministry.

Heb 9:22 – And almost all things are by the law purged with blood; and without shedding of blood is no remission.

Heb 9:23 – It was therefore necessary that the patterns of things in the heavens should be purified with these; but the heavenly things themselves with better sacrifices than these.

Heb 9:24 – For Christ is not entered into the holy places made with hands, which are the figures (idols) of the true; but into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of God for us:

Heb 9:25 – Nor yet that he should offer himself often, as the high priest entereth into the holy place every year with blood of others;

Heb 9:26 – For then must he often have suffered since the foundation of the world: but now once in the end of the world hath he appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself.

Heb 9:27 – And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment:

Heb 9:28 – So Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many; and unto them that look for him shall he appear the second time without sin unto salvation.

–=–

The point? Worshiping God through idols was ceased, where Jesus Christ (personification and example of Logos) replaced those idols. We are called in the New Testament not to worship Jesus Christ as God or as an idol, but to become Christlike in our actions under Gods Law so as to worship Jehovah. Instead of sacrificing idols to God, we are to be the sacrifice ourselves, sacrificing (crucifying) all worldly things so as to live spiritually, in the Realm of God’s Nature and under Its Law. We are to become the sons of God by following the example. In this way, the sacrifice is Real, not made in idolatry, or in other words, we act on and under the Law of God (Nature) instead of just using idols as an excuse not to follow that Law. In essence, what this is saying is that a man cannot make his sins disappear in some mock, ceremonial atonement, by killing , mutilating, and bleeding dry some poor defenseless animal that is part of God’s Creation, for this pointless, purposeless murder of an innocent beast is certainly a sin in and of itself. It makes about as much sense as hunting elephants and giraffes for sport. You cannot cleanse your own blood of its sin by taking that of another, completely innocent beast. No, it is you that must stop acting like a beast, sacrificing from your spiritual Life that which is of the world of the flesh, the world of men (i.e. secularism, legalism). Instead of slaying innocent beasts as the Babylonian false gods demanded, man must follow the example of Christ (the Law of Nature personified) in order to rectify ones own sin — to be reborn from the realm of man’s law into the realm of God’s Law, in order to go back to Nature (God). In other words, this means that the legal person, the respect of fiction and the law that governs fiction, the lies, must die (metaphorically), so that the spiritual man may emerge without legal ties (false law) that prevent a man from acting under God’s Law. One cannot be saved from the trappings of false religion and worldly afflictions through useless killing in idolatry. It is our blood that must be spiritually purified. Thus, the Christ allegory is a guidepost allowing all men to return from the Babylonian woe, from Jewish (antichrist) influence, back to the very Nature we are born originally into. We that shed what the Bible refers to as sin can only do so by following the Law of Nature (Logos). For sin is just a general term meaning artifice, lies, fictions, idolatry, and self-deceit. SYN. That which is synthetic, not of Nature, not of God’s Realm or under Its’ Law.

So let’s put these pieces together here…

The Bible Law (i.e. common law of blood-right) says that in order for a testament to be valid, its testator (author) must be dead. No death, no inheritance. So one must ask oneself, how does an undying, “Living God” (Jehovah), defined as the entirety of Existence, the Universe and Nature Itself in Supreme Being (the verb Being, as Existence Itself), construct such a testament and still remain the eternal, never-ending, Living God? Here we may better understand the purpose behind the allegory of the Son (testator) of God, or He that was allegorically sent to die for our sins, in order that the New Testament (New Law of God) might be left to all men through death, a requirement of the law of the testator. This is figuratively the exact story played out in the maxims of law. In other words, this is an allegorical representation of what all men must suffer; namely, to be reborn from civil (legal) death in exchange for spiritual (True) Life under God, under the Law of Nature (Jehovah), personified in the story (allegory) of Christ. And yet it is so clearly written here that this True Life of substance without idolatry and empty sacrifice cannot be attained by merely participating in religious ceremonies and false sacrificial “communions” of eating meats (defined scripturally as any foodstuffs, literal or figurative) to false idols. This ceremonial custom of animal sacrifice, in fact, is surprisingly, completely against scripture, as we can read above. Just as you can’t squeeze blood from a turnip, as the saying goes, you certainly cannot squeeze the spiritual (figurative) blood of christ (atonement/forgiveness of sins) out of a communion wafer or other idol, and especially not from one of God’s own innocent Creatures. And no, grape juice is not a substitute for the works of, in, and under the blood of christ (Logos – God’s Law personified).

While the current false doctrines of corporate, religious gobbledygook and the ceremonial nonsense it promotes is enough to drive men away from such spiritually sound principles as the notion of the True meaning and intent behind the “blood of christ” and the reason for this story of the ultimate sacrifice by God — that a testament necessarily means the death of its testator — we may understand that the never-ending, never-changing God (Jehovah) cannot die lest we all figuratively die with It, waking up to our True, spiritual Nature. Therefore, the Son of God must be sacrificed, so that the Law (Will) of God may be testified and transferred to us. But in order to inherit this set of principles, we must become the sons of God ourselves. Jesus Christ is our example of how to do this, by following the Law of God. As Its sons, we become the spiritual, figurative primogeniture of God’s Kingdom (Nature). If you try and take this as literal, you will never understand It nor find yourself in It. You must reach deep down and find what is lost, that is, the ability to Love and cherish such moral stories and allegories for what they are intended to give you, learning from them as intended, and then acting accordingly. Poetry is, it turns out, for Real men. In other words, man may now Live Truly under this New Testament of Law, by the Will of Jehovah, by following in the sacrificial (metaphoric) blood of christ as a brotherhood of God’s sons. And what is so beautiful about this concept is that it literally requires nothing. No thing. No persons, places, or things (nouns/names). It is the negative Law, the Law of Truth, and Truth has no name (noun). It is the realm of God, of Nature, of that which is unblemished by the names and titles and defects and marks and fictional rights of man’s law and custom. He that is of God is the lesser part of God. Yet he who falls from such Grace is still of the Greater Good (God), the Higher Whole, but is tricked into allowing (consenting) that which is lesser in Law to overtake him. For the Greater always contains the lesser, just as the principal always contains the agent, the truster the trustee, the employer the employee, and so on. Hierarchically speaking, the power and Glory and Grace of that which is of Jehovah never loses its power or its Law, for the Law of Nature reigns supreme at all times, knowing that without it no Existence of any kind, Real or artificial, would Exist, as all self-Existence is literally Jehovah defined. All other forms of so-called “existence” are artificial, or that which is a re-creation of man. Thus, the foundational, scripture-based maxims of law spell out and follow exactly what one would expect.

But there is a problem. For the scriptures, after so much shared wisdom and warning with regards to the trickery of men and the simple instructions given from the perspective of being in Grace in recognizing everything that is false and of the father of lies (i.e. the re-creations of man influenced by devilish, adversarial intentions), also give us the free will to go against the Will of God, to break the Law and Covenant. The willing fool has no place in God’s Realm and has no access to God’s Law. He that should worship and express joy by the deceits and trickery of the lies of mans’ artifice, enjoining himself to that which is below him in persona (mask) and flattering title (idol), shall then be under the law of that which is lower than him, representing spiritual death, as the inability to govern ones own actions under God’s Law. So says the Bible — and thus the foundational maxims of law agree.

Many of the Highest maxims of law are simply constructs stripped from the Bible. This should be of no surprise when one understands that the Bible (as the unwritten, moral Law) is the foundation of the common law, and that, therefore, the unwritten was copied unto the written (Roman) law for the purposes of opposition. In other words, the unwritten, moral law must be recognized in order for the written, immoral law to have purpose, otherwise there is no reason for man’s law. Without recognition of Christ (God’s Law/Logos) there is no need or use for anything anti-christ. There is no left without right, no up without down, no light without darkness, no evil without good. To understand this, one must understand that God’s Law is neutral, whereas the Law of Rome is strict and sanctioned (punishable). By neutrality I mean that God’s Law is the Law of Nature, as is an inevitable Act of God, meaning the Act had nothing to do with man’s designs, inventions, or interference. It just Is. It Exists with or without man’s presence. A lightening strike causing a fire is an Act of God. It is a neutral event in Nature, and only a fool would believe it to be targeted at anything or sent for the purposes of some man’s judgement. What arrogance, conceit, and outright idiocy must it take for any man to believe that the power of the Universe (God) can or should be directed at any other man, or upon oneself. Yes, I will certainly concede that the idiot that ignorantly walks into a lightening storm without the fear of the Universe (God’s Nature and Law) increases his chances of being judged for his stupidity, if you will. But the purpose of that discharge of energy we call as lightening has for its purpose nothing to do with any man or any other object it connects with. If man didn’t exist, lightening would still strike wherever Nature’s Design warranted it. And so it is with the notion of God’s Judgment. When the Law of God, the Law of Nature, and the Laws of Nature are broken, then it is only reasonable to conclude that some consequence (judgement) will follow, rebalancing the metaphorical scales of Nature’s permanent Design. Poison the drinking well, and the user of that well will be judged (poisoned) for his own sin. Eat unnaturally according to FDA recommendations and be judged with obesity, diabetes, cancer, or other illness. This is a neutral, or rather a causality effect, not a religious one. We reap what we sow, and most of the time we deserve the fate we create for ourselves.

The deceits promulgated by the church and state are seemingly insurmountable at times, just as the perceived need of money, the root fo all evil, is certainly the great destroyer of our time. To be deceived is a choice, and the Bible allows all men to be deceived if they choose to be. Free will… And, of course, the legal law of men depends upon deceit. Without deceit, there would be no nations, no governments, and no false gods heading those governments. The maxims of man’s law repeatedly tell us that he who seeks to be deceived cannot then complain about being deceived when he acts voluntarily in that deceit. Deceit is made legal by governments of the legal (artificial) realm, by contract, and specifically by voluntary participation in that deceitful practice. Contracts are the strings that control the puppet, which is why the Bible forbids them. For a contract is always between legal persons and therefore under the law of fictional (legal) persons, not God’s Law. Ignorance of God’s Law is no more an excuse than ignorance of man’s legal law according to its maxims and to the Bible. The difference is plain though, for the Bible warns against such deceits and gives you the Law of God (the allegory of Christ personified) in order to escape them. Thus, God’s Word (Law) is said to be the Armor of God, or in other words, the Shield and Sword of Truth (God). The Truth (God) will set you free, but only if you follow the Law of God (Truth/Nature) exemplified by the allegory of Christ. The legal system wholly depends on self-deceit, on illusion, on trickery, on dissimulation, and on the fact that those that are deceived remain in such a state of decay.

Job 12:16  – With him is strength and wisdom: the deceived and the deceiver are his (the destroyers’).

2Ti 3:13 – But evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse, deceiving, and being deceived.

Deu 11:16 – Take heed to yourselves, that your heart be not deceived, and ye turn aside, and serve other gods, and worship them;

Job 15:31 – Let not him that is deceived trust in vanity: for vanity shall be his recompence.

Luk 21:8 – And he said, Take heed that ye be not deceived: for many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and the time draweth near: go ye not therefore after them.

1Co 6:9-10 – Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.

1Co 6:11-12 – And such were some of you: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God. All things are lawful unto me, but all things are not expedient: all things are lawful for me, but I will not be brought under the power of any.

1Co 15:33 –  Be not deceived: evil communications corrupt good manners.

Gal 6:7 –  Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.

Rev 18:23 – And the light of a candle shall shine no more at all in thee; and the voice of the bridegroom and of the bride shall be heard no more at all in thee: for thy merchants (corporations) were the great men (artificial persons) of the earth; for by thy sorceries (pharmacopeia) were all nations deceived.

–=–

There is only one Law of Existence, of Nature, of Reality. The word Law is hardly adequate to describe It, for what word can possibly define what is self-Evident? This self-Existent (non-man-made) Order or Design is called as God’s Law, for God Is Reality, Is Truth, Is Nature, and Is All self-Existence — all that is not man-made. This Order of Nature, called as the Law of Nature (God), stands in self-evidence without exception, and is not alterable by men or by the artificial laws invented by men. All other so-called law is man-made, is consensual, voluntary, temporary, meaning that it must be contracted like any disease. And like a disease, man’s law will die without a host, without a volunteer, without victims; but only if you stop respecting it as Real, as part of God’s Nature. It always requires the breaking with the Law of God (Nature). There are no exceptions. There is no other law (doctrine) that does not specifically require one to break the Law of God, for no law of man is a self-evident part of God, that is, of Existence (Truth). No law of man is also a Law of Nature. There is no purpose for any law invented by man except to break the Law of God. There is no permit or license that is not intended to break with the Law of God. There is no legal person, place, or thing (name/noun) that is not intended to exist outside of the Realm and thus Law of God’s Nature. There is no positive invention by man that is not intended to control, harness, deceive, or destroy that which is a negative (already Existing) Creation of God. Man can only create artifice (art), and another word for art is technology. Only when mans creation is in harmony with and designed to protect and serve Nature can it be of the Will and Testament (Law/Word) of God. All of this is self-evident Truth, for the only Truth is God and that which is Created under and in harmony with Its Law. God does not invent, only man does.

The fool may consider such rhetoric to be a form of circular logic (dialectic). And yet no logic of man need be applied to the self-Existence of Godly things (of Nature). The circular notion of false logic is apparent by the flaws of its argument in referential to man-made (artificial) support for its accuracy. No-one can argue that Nature, in any way, is illogical, nor especially unreasonable. Its Design is beyond man’s capability of comprehension by use of the vulgar languages (including mathamatics), as all spiritual things are. What appears to the sophist as a circular logic is the very power of the negative aspect of Nature, which cannot be defeated by any positive (invention of man), unless one consents to that legal (anti-God) “fact” or “invention/design.” But a fact is not a Truth, and no facts need Exist in Nature, for Existence itself is self-evident Truth. Truth (God) needs no positively considered or pretended facts to Exist, and neither therefore does man. And that’s the point! That’s the power of God (Truth) — of being an anonymous part of God and thus part of and under the authority of the only whole and Highest Truth. In a spiritual and yes even circular way, one is protected from all lies when one remains in this circle of Truth, never allowing fiction and lies to break that spiritual circle. As they say, the Truth will set you free. For this circle is Real. It is Reality; the cycle of Nature. It is the realm of those who Live in and by the Grace of God and never accept what man has to offer in contract and thus become bound under the law of contracts (persons). For remember, a contract is only needed for those who seek to break with the Will and Testament (Law) of God, of self-government, of Love, Charity, Trust, Truth, and self-discipline. There are no contracts in Nature, in Love, in Charity, nor especially in Forgiveness. Understand this, and you may then literally and spiritually “under-stand” God’s Law. But if you comprehend it without applying it, you are indeed the very definition of a hypocrite (idolator).

–=–

“A contract founded on a base and unlawful consideration, or against good morals, is null.”

–Contractus ex turpi causa, vel contra bonos mores nullus est.  Hob. 167; Dig. 2, 14, 27, 4.

–=–

“The law never suffers anything contrary to truth. But sometimes it allows a conclusive presumption in opposition to truth.”

–Contra veritatem lex numquam aliquid permittit. ” 2 Co. Inst. 252. 24 See 3 Bouv. Inst. n. 3061.

–=–

“The agreement of the parties overcomes or prevails against the law.” 

–Conventio vincit legem. 2 Story, Ag. § See Dig. 16, 3, 1, 6.

–=–

The foundational maxims of law do not suffer anything that is not of the realm of Truth. But when a man can be tricked and deceived into entering into the legal contracts of the devil (attorneys), then this maxim invoking the power of Truth is bypassed. The law will suffer anything you can be deceived into accepting and volunteering for. For under contract, the Armor of Truth (God) is stripped from every man.

To avoid what is avoidable (man’s inventions and false, legal law) one must consciously avoid it. But once we accept or contract into what is avoidable, namely fraud, what is avoidable becomes unavoidable. This is where most of us stand. We are accepting and participating contractually in fraud (hypocrisy). The contract is valid because we don’t call it what it is. And if we do, if we understand the fraud, none of us are acting morally against it. Words are idols if those words are not acted upon, and so calling something as fraud while still acting in it is idolatry. Thus, we are still volunteering in that which is avoidable, for to nullify an immoral or otherwise unlawful contract under both realms of the law one must act with moral rectitude in opposition and avoidance against it. We are not doing so. The contract is lawful as long as the parties agree to it. And our agreement comes not in the form of words, but in the form of our actions in support of those legal (artificial) words. Contracts are excuses not to act under God’s Law. We act in the fraud, that is, in legal persona, therefore we accept the fraud. We pretended to become the fiction (person/title) and continue to pretend to be it. In other words, we are not following Christ (God’s Law), and are instead accepting the false, legal law (doctrine) of men. The legal system cannot be made null until men stop acting legally within it (against God’s Nature and Law). And most importantly, we cannot worship God nor follow Christ (Law) while acting in a legal persona (mask) that is required as property (status inside) of government to follow the legal, man-made, anti-God, antichrist, false law of men.

This was and is the reason behind the New Law, the New Testament, the allegorical blood sacrifice of Jesus Christ (Logos). We are part of the story. We were, through and because of the sacrifice of Logos, given cosmic free will. We were given the ability to attempt to break with the Law of Nature in a legal matrix of total self-deceit, though in Reality this is impossible. We were allowed to play the fool. But once we recognize ourselves as the fool, as I have recognized myself to be, it’s this point in our lives that we must either die to the secular world in order to find spiritual Life under God and Its Law, or we will continue, as so many of us are, to live by the deceits of the flesh in self-deceit and in hypocrisy.

If you’ve read this up to this point, then you know right now whether you are a hypocrite like me, or you are a son of God. If you are pretending to be the idol of a “Christian” then you know that such a placed upon yourself as a flattering title is either well-deserved by your actions or is carried in deceit as a false show in idolatry. And finally, you know now that the Bible cannot be dismissed as religious nonsense, and that should you choose to lift yourself out of this voluntary self-deceit that it’s you and only you that has the power to become Christ-like, to make the allegory of Christ become your own True story. You have the Armor. Now you must decide to bear it or throw it off for the sins (untruths) of the secular world.

And if you’re honest with yourself right now, you know the Truth is that you already know the answer, you already know your decision, because you already know the path, and from this point on you are either on that path or you are not. For most of you, including myself, this is what it feels like to Truly be a hypocrite.

Welcome to hell…

.

–Clint richard-son (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Wednesday, August 21st, 2019

 

Orwell’s New Law: Intolerance Is Tolerance


—=—

“A man in debt is so far a slave.”

—Ralph Waldo Emerson

—=—

I’ve got something to say, and you probably aren’t going to like it. And try as you will to dispute it, the Truth is a piercing sword, unable to be deflected even in this time of great deceit — this grand delusion.

Yes, freedom is slavery. It’s called the commercial franchise of national citizenship (legally called as freedom), a reimagined form of denizenship as a post-modern neo-feudalistic form of the same old debt-slavery of yesteryear.

Yes, we understand that war is peace. These are merely the two different extremes of a legally (secularly) bound international commerce, the state of war being a violent purge of uncooperative nations or people (tribes) seeking independence from a slave-inducing, interconnected world currency and its performance-debtor slave system through extortive taxation and internationally imposed sanctions. When the violent, murderous trade war ceases, the then subdued, defeated nations submit to the usual forced but supposedly voluntary “peace” of commerce via international trade yet again. The difference between war and peace is merely a declaration of one or the other, though both have the same goal, to profit the elite bloodlines of archons behind nation-building and United Nations programs that assure free-flowing commerce (peace) between those internationally bound corporations (nations).

And yes, we have witnessed globally that ignorance is strength. But this phenomenon is only understandable from the perspective of national governments toward their enslaved, enfranchised (free range) masses (common human live-stock), as we are hopelessly educated and entrained by entertainments and standardized, institutionalized lies (also called history), and of course what is quickly becoming our very own censored, institutionalized newspeak. My people around the world are, without a doubt, being destroyed and controlled through a mandated, standardized system that teaches and instills a guaranteed lack of knowledge. It’s called public education.

But there is an underlying Orwellian, that is, dystopian maxim that stands as the foundation for all of this, the source behind all three of these seemingly paradoxical but fully demonstrable states of induced, artificial existence detached from Nature (God), which have led to this now globalist Newspeak society we pretend to exist in. There is one ingredient, one agenda that must be pushed universally for this trifecta of dark, globalist tyranny to prevail…

There must be a despotically enforced, unequivocal (absolute) state of artificial, passively consented-to tolerance.

—=—

Our rulers can have no authority over natural rights,
only as we have submitted to them
.
The rights of conscience we never submitted.
We are answerable for them to our God.
The legitimate powers of government extend
to such acts only as injurious to others
.”  

—Thomas Jefferson

—=—

What is the highest moral (Natural) Law? To do no harm, without exception, including the use of words as weapons.

What do the governments of men thrive upon? Doing harm, and more specifically causing us all to harm one another in any way legally possible (permissively through words) as a dysfunctional lifestyle. In other words, creating and administering dystopia — a debtor’s hell.

Our society is like a poker game, consisting of a set of neighbors (players/actors) that pretend a sort of cordial camaraderie and shallow friendship while secretly seeking to competitively out-do, defeat, destroy, and bankrupt each other. Every player at the poker table is necessarily, situationally, and by disposition subjected into being a member of the anti-cult of the Joneses, always seeking to one-up each other, prideful and miserly of their continued earnings, existing solely for the purpose of profit and gain. Meanwhile, the dealer (government and banker) sets and administrates the rules of this necessary, mutually required illicit conduct, allowing legally (permissively) this abhorrent behavior within a prescribed, licensed set of rules. For this administrative “service” the dealer (government) legally steals (taxes) for its own profit the total wealth spent in each transaction (poker hand), raking in a small percentage from each round of cards (commerce) being dealt for the house — an administrative fee, of course. But as the total money left on the table is constantly diminished by this house service charge (called the take), each neighbor must constantly refresh the money pool with his own savings or, finally, leave bankrupt (as a broke loser). Essentially, this is how governments corral and subjugate their common citizenry, setting the rules of “commerce” (the rules of the game) so that we are all constantly practicing deceit and treachery toward one another while feigning to be good neighbors, the ultimate hypocrisy (simulation). It’s just business, we are entrained to say, as if this is some viable excuse to break the highest law of Nature (God) to love your neighbor, to do no harm, and to act always in love, charity, and forgiveness. But, of course, there would be no poker games or need for government if this moral, spiritual, “unwritten” Law was respected absolutely. Gambling, as does citizenship, requires God’s Law (and therefore natural rights) to be trampled underfoot. In legality, the only duty that can be found is the taxation laid upon us all. Instead of acknowledging and fulfilling our moral duty to all men, we pay a duty (tax) so that we don’t have to. Legalism is, after all, the undoing of God’s (Nature’s) Law.

The point? The legal law can only control us if we can be made to voluntarily, continuously harm and injure one another through legal (man-made) methods of false law. To injure, in legalism, means to bring someone or something IN to and therefore under the legal LAW (jure) by means of invoking it in commerce (contract), or in other words by causing all actions of men to be done through a government assigned, artificial, legal persona (mask) — men acting not in Nature (under God and Its Higher Law) but instead in legal (artificial) persona, a false “strawman” that is property of the commercialized corporation of government. We tolerate harm in every way, to each other and to ourselves, as if it’s a normal, or even natural part of “life” as citizenships (debt-slaves). We are acting as commercial vessels, and therefore, as feudal vassals.

VASSALnoun – 1: A person under the protection of a feudal lord to whom he has vowed homage and fealty: a feudal tenant2: One in a subservient or subordinate position. (–Webster’s Dictionary Online, current)

—=—

Maxim of law: With protection comes subjection (subservience/subordination).

In other words, by doing all things commercially in a false, legal persona (status, which is property of government), all actions done by national “citizens” are considered as being legally protected under international law, and, as the maxim of law goes, with protection comes subjection. You see, this maxim applies to both men and the persons (legal status) men pretend to act within, which inversely means that to have the protection of God (Natural rights), one must subject oneself only to the Law of Nature (God), never to what is legal (anti-God, anti-Nature). And so, having legal protection as “consumers” in commerce requires voluntary personhood (legal existence/status) and subjection to the false gods (magistrates) of government. The concept is not at all different, metaphorically speaking, as being either an angel or a demon. Both answer to their perspective gods and are bound by the law thereof. The personification of the angel guides men towards the Law of Nature while the demon (devil) drives men towards the big lie, the artificial aspect of false existence (citizenship in personhood) separated from Nature (God) and Its Law. The angel exists only in Nature (Reality) and may only influence and guide men towards Nature (God) and Its Law. But the demon exists only in fiction, in legal commerce, unable to do anything to men in Nature nor effect the Natural (God-given) rights of men (to do no harm) unless men can be deceived and tricked into entering into the legal, artificial realm (hell) via commercial contract, including citizenship to the legalist, secular nations. Nature (God) is Truth. Legalism is always a lie. One cannot have two opposing gods (masters), nor can one practice two opposing laws. One cannot claim the Natural rights emanating from Nature (God) while acting in an unnatural state of false existence (persona) and following only the law governing fiction. One cannot follow the Law of Nature (God) while also following its complete, intentional opposite, the law of men (legalism). And while the True intent of the concept of possessing the Natural (God-given) right of freedom of religion only exists in Nature, under God (as the practice only of the Law of Nature and exemption from legal, manmade sanctions), legalism only exists outside of and without God, without the Law of Nature. Legal law is a pretended exemption from the Law and Laws of Nature (God). It is really just satanism in disguise, for the meaning of the word satan is merely that which is adversarial to God (Nature/Truth) and Its Law. In legalism, the legal terminology (trickery) “freedom of religion” actually means freedom from religion, or in other words, freedom from Nature (God) and Its Law. All legal, commercial law necessarily defies, opposes, and abandons what is Nature (God) and Its Law, for all legal persons, places, and things (nouns/names) are false. In Nature, all of Existence (Creation) is anonymous, nameless, and therefore carries no mark, no blemish, and no sign of legal property. Nothing in Nature is property of man. Only legal (artificial) persons, places, and things (names placed upon Reality) are property (creations of) men. And so, when the Law of Nature is transmuted, reconstituted, and thus perverted from Nature (God) into commercial (legal) code, and when men can be tricked into following this artificial code instead of the actual Law of Existence (God), then men carry the delusion that all of Nature, including themselves, are property of some commercial government corporation. Every tree, plant, animal, element, and living creature has been blemished with a legal name (noun/”thing”). Every geographical area of Nature (God) has been bestowed a legal name (noun) designating it a “place” or jurisdiction. And every man has been given an additional name (noun) and other marks that identify us all as some form of legal persona (noun/name). Therefore, through this word-trickery or word-majick of the legal language, all parts of Nature have been claimed as the property of mans creations, of artificial persons (corporations) created by the governments of men.

—=—

“The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie –
deliberate, contrived and dishonest – but the myth,
persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.
Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion
without the discomfort of thought.”

–John F. Kennedy

—=—

We have allowed hell on Earth to come into existence, and we follow its pretenders, its false gods (magistrates) and legal codes as its vassals in an open-air debtors prison. And we have been so far separated from our own Nature (God) by this mythos that even the idea of self-governing under the Law of God by claiming what is inherently ours, that is, our only actual God-given (Natural) right that is to do no harm, no longer exists as even a possibility, for to exist in and under the artifice of nations and legal law we must therefore cause continuous harm to one another. To get ahead one must, either unwittingly or with deceitful understanding, harm all others. To make money (mammon) one must charge usury and act in grocery (harm/evil). And to have wealth as “property” (in mammon) one must act according to the dictates of lust, of greed, and of purposeful antagonism toward the Law and Laws of Nature (God). Citizenship, by its artificial nature, is the seven deadly sins all tied up in one corporate employment to “the state.”

And that’s just what it is: employment. A citizenship is an employee of its government, an agent to its principal. And an employee has no choice. An employee must act the part he or she is playing. A citizenship of a nation (corporation) has no right and no authority to act under Gods (Nature’s) Law. Moral choice is against the legal law. Not moral thought, only the right to act on that moral thought is taken away. Let’s face it… the continuity of government depends solely on men not acting upon their moral conscious against it. And this is the very purpose behind the multitude of false religions married (incorporated) under the legal state – belief without acting on that belief. In other words, hypocrisy (simulation) at its worst.

It is the element of choice that Truly validates ones actions. Legalism takes away choice, and often forces us to do the opposite of what we would otherwise choose to do. Choice is an illusion while we are plugged-in to The Matrix (legal simulation).

The following cannot be feigned or forced by legal sanction. They must come from the soul. They must come from the conscious mind of men, not as a bylaw of a corporation through fictional persons in simulation. For these are “family values” not corporate rules.

Lust is defeated by self-control, that is, self-government, chastity.

Gluttony is defeated by temperance, in serving others before ourselves.

Greed is cured by charity in all things, by putting the needs of others before ourselves.

Sloth is ceased when one has zeal, a zest and respect for all life, and diligence toward the needs of others.

Wrath, as anger toward another, is defeated by patience, by empathetic understanding of the disposition of others.

Envy has no place when the desire to help others succeed is more powerful than the desire to defeat, compete, or otherwise supersede them.

And pride can hold no man’s ego when one stands always in perspective humility, instead standing always in the attitude of service to all men and all True Existence (Nature/God).

The legal person is all of these in one, by legal requirement and/or as a result of the legal code, causing lustful and self-serving (glutinous) behavior, creating greed as intention and sloth as consequence, where lawyers capitalize and promote wrathful thought for profit and gain, playing perfectly into the resultant envy promoted by entertainment, advertising, and educational institutions, all packaged up in a fervent, national pride that necessarily excludes all others in the world not of the same pretended ethnicity (nationality). Personhood is legalized sin. Personhood is spiritual death.

The poker player would never follow these self-evident Laws of Nature (God), and neither can the citizenship of the nations of mammon. To succeed in mammon, all of these must be put aside to make room for evil intent, coveting after the false god of money.

Aristotle, who apparently penned the Nicomachean Ethics, expounds on what is the nature of actions in volunteerism, what is involuntary, and what he calls the non-voluntary aspects of the dualistic nature of these behaviors, which generally reflect the Law of Nature (God) as virtue (need) and the legal, commercial drive as the excess (desire/want) and/or deficiency that is expressed by a lack thereof in each virtue. Listed below, the “mean” category signifies a natural, reasonable balance between the excess and the deficiency. Of course, the legal system as commerce seeks to exploit the excess and the deficiency of moral character, just as one would expect from the demons of legalism, of those who seek to gain and promote the purely secular, legal ideal and lifestyle of their own version of “freedom of religion,” legally meaning freedom from the Law of God (Nature), legally licensed freedom from personal responsibility towards other men and from self-government (self-control under the moral Law). What is a legal version is never the same and always opposed to that which it simulates in hypocrisy.

Here I have listed these ethical principles along with the Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language definition of each term, which also reflects the same moral ethic in Biblical terms. When reading these, it must be from the perspective that each extreme represents the two trays of a scale, whereupon that scale tips in the favor of spirituality under God (the Law of Nature) and its opposing force of secularism under legalism (fallacious logic as the law of men). Yet too much of even the spiritually minded concept may cause men to act just as foolishly as the secularist extreme of that scale. It is balance we seek, not perfection. And this balance is self-governance under God’s Law (of Nature).  However, do not be fooled by the notion that legalism offers a counter-balance to perfection. That is not its design. Its design is to tip the scale in only one direction at all times, while simulating a religious foundation of moral equivalence and manifest destiny. This is a lie told by the king of lies, by men seeking power through the destruction of your ability to self-govern, and by taking you away from God (Nature) through false denominations (empty names) of the false doctrines of corporate religion. In other words, legalism is designed to keep you at all times spiritually unbalanced. All of these expressive traits, again, are based on choice. Legalism offers no choice, while the Law of God relies only on your choice to follow It or turn away from it towards the artificial construct of a legalistic lifestyle in spiritual death.

–=–

COURAGE – noun – [Latin, the heart.] Bravery; intrepidity; that quality of mind which enables men to encounter danger and difficulties with firmness, or without fear or depression of spirits; valor; boldness; resolution. It is a constituent part of fortitude; but fortitude implies patience to bear continued suffering. Courage that grows from constitution, often forsakes a man when he has occasion for it; courage which arises from a sense of duty, acts in a uniform manner. Be strong and of good courage Deuteronomy 31:6. (Websters1828)

Concerned with Mean Excess Deficiency
fear (phobos) Courage (andreia): mean in fear and confidence First Type. Foolhardy or excessive fearlessness; is one who over indulges in fearful activities. Cowardly (deilos): exceeds in fear and is deficient in confidence
confidence (thrasos) Second Type. Rash (thrasus): exceeds in confidence

–=–

TEMPERANCE – noun – [Latin temperantia, from temper.] 1. Moderation; particularly, habitual moderation in regard to the indulgence of the natural appetites and passions; restrained or moderate indulgence; as temperance in eating and drinking; temperance in the indulgence of joy or mirth. Temperance in eating and drinking is opposed to gluttony and drunkenness, and in other indulgences, to excess. 2. Patience; calmness; sedateness; moderation of passion. He calm’d his wrath with goodly temperance. [Unusual](Websters1828)

Concerned with Mean Excess Deficiency
pleasure (hēdonē)
and pain (lupē)
Temperance (sōphrosunē) Profligacy, dissipation, etc. (akolasia) scarcely occurs, but we may call it Insensible (including a lack of empathy, happiness from doing harm)(anaisthētos)

–=–

LIBERALITY – noun – [Latin liberalitas. See Liberal.] 1. Munificence; bounty. That liberality is but cast away, which makes us borrow what we cannot pay. 2. A particular act of generosity; a donation; a gratuity. In this sense, it has the plural number. A prudent man is not impoverished by his liberalities. 3. Largeness of mind; catholicism (universalism); that comprehensiveness of mind which includes other interests beside its own, and duly estimates in its decisions the value or importance of each. It is evidence of a noble mind to judge of men and things with liberality. Many treat the gospel with indifference under the name of liberality. 4. Candor; impartiality. (Websters1828)

Concerned with Mean Excess Deficiency
giving and getting (smaller amounts of) money liberality (Rackham),
generosity (Sachs) (eleutheriotēs)
prodigality (Rackham),
wastefulness (Sachs) (asōtia)
meanness (Rackham), stinginess (Sachs) (aneleutheria)

–=–

MAGNIFICENCE – noun – [Latin magnificentia.] Grandeur of appearance; greatness and splendor of show or state; as the magnificence of a palace or of a procession; the magnificence of a Roman triumph. (Websters1828)

Concerned with Mean Excess Deficiency
giving and getting greater things Magnificence (megaloprepeia) Tastelessness (apeirokalia) or Vulgarity (banausia) Paltriness (Rackham), Chintziness (Sachs) (mikroprepeia)

–=–

MAGNANIM’ITY – noun – [Latin magnanimitas; magnus, great, and animus, mind.] Greatness of mind; that elevation or dignity of soul, which encounters danger and trouble with tranquillity and firmness, which raises the possessor above revenge, and makes him delight in acts of benevolence, which makes him disdain injustice and meanness, and prompts him to sacrifice personal ease, interest and safety for the accomplishment of useful and noble objects. (Websters1828)

Concerned with Mean Excess Deficiency
great honor (timē) and dishonor Greatness of Soul (megalopsuchia)
(Traditional translation “magnanimity”. Sometimes “pride”.)
Vanity (chaunotēs) Smallness of Soul (self-hatred)(mikropsuchia)

–=–

AMBITION – noun – [Latin ambitio, from ambio, to go about, or to seek by making interest, of amb, about, and eo, to go. See Ambages. This word had its origin in the practice of Roman candidates for office, who went about the city to solicit votes.] A desire of preferment, or of honor; a desire of excellence or superiority. It is used in a good sense; as, emulation may spring from a laudable ambition. It denotes also an inordinate desire of power, or eminence, often accompanied with illegal means to obtain the object. It is sometimes followed by of; as, a man has an ambition of wit. Milton has used the word in the Latin sense of going about, or attempting; but this sense is hardly legitimate. (Websters1828)

Concerned with Mean Excess Deficiency
lesser honor (timē) and dishonor no special term in ancient Greek for the right amount of ambition Over-ambitiousness) (philotimos) lack of ambition (aphilotimos)

–=–

GENTLENESS noun – [See Gentle.] Dignity of birth. [Little used.] 1. Genteel behavior. 2. Softness of manners; mildness of temper; sweetness of disposition; meekness. The fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, long suffering, gentlenessgoodness, faith. Galatians 5:223. Kindness; benevolence. 4. Tenderness; mild treatment. (Websters1828)

Concerned with Mean Excess Deficiency
anger (orgē) Gentleness (praotēs) Irascibility (Rackham), Irritability (Sachs) (orgilotēs) Spiritlessness (aorgẽsia)

–=–

FRIENDLINESS – noun – 1. A disposition to friendship; friendly disposition. 2. Exertion of benevolence or kindness. (Websters1828)

Concerned with Mean Excess Deficiency
general pleasantness in life Friendliness (something like philia) First Type. obsequious (areskos), if for no purpose quarrelsome (duseris) and surly (duskolos) (contrarian)
Second type. flatterer (kolax), if for own advantage

–=–

TRUTHFUL – adjective – Full of truth. (Websters1828)

TRUTH – noun – 1. Conformity to fact or reality; exact accordance with that which is, or has been, or shall be. The truth of history constitutes its whole value. We rely on the truth of the scriptural prophecies. My mouth shall speak truth. Proverbs 8:7. Sanctify them through thy truth; thy word is truth. John 17:172. True state of facts or things. The duty of a court of justice is to discover the truth. Witnesses are sworn to declare the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth 3. Conformity of words to thoughts, which is called moral truth. Shall truth fail to keep her word? 4. Veracity; purity from falsehood; practice of speaking truth; habitual disposition to speak truth; as when we say, a man is a man of truth. 5. Correct opinion. 6. Fidelity; constancy. The thoughts of past pleasure and truth. 7. Honesty; virtue. It must appear, That malice bears down truth. 8. Exactness; conformity to rule. Plows, to go true, depend much on the truth of the iron work. [Not in use.] 9. Real fact of just principle; real state of things. There are innumerable truths with which we are not acquainted. 10. Sincerity… 13. It is sometimes used by way of concession… That is, it is a truth; what you have said, I admit to be true. In truth in reality; in fact. Of a truth in reality; certainly. To do truth is to practice what God commands. John 3. (Websters1828)

Concerned with Mean Excess Deficiency
truth (alēthēs) Truthfulness (alētheia) Boastfulness: pretense as exaggeration (alazoneia) Self-deprecation: pretense as understatement (eironia, same word as “irony“)

–=–

WITTY – adjective – [from wit.] 1. Possessed of wit; full of wit; as a witty poet. 2. Judicious; ingenious; inventive. 3. Sarcastic; full of taunts. (Websters1828)

WIT – verb intransitive – [G., to know. See Wise.] To know. This verb is used only in the infinitive, to wit namely, that is to say. [Latin] – noun [See the verb and Wise.] 1. Primarily, the intellect; the understanding or mental powers. Will puts in practice what the wit deviseth. For wit and power their last endeavors bend to outshine each other. 2. The association of ideas in a manner natural, but unusual and striking, so as to produce surprise joined with pleasure. wit is defined. What oft was thought, but neer so well expressed. Wit consists in assembling and putting together with quickness, ideas in which can be found resemblance and congruity, by which to make up pleasant pictures and agreeable visions in the fancy. Wit consists chiefly in joining things by distant and fanciful relations, which surprise us because they are unexpected. Wit is a propriety of thoughts and words; or in other terms, thoughts and words elegantly adapted to the subject. 3. The faculty of associating ideas in a new and unexpected manner. 4. A man of genius; as, the age of Addison abounded with wits. A wit herself, Amelia weds a wit. 5. A man of fancy or wit. Intemperate wits will spare neither friend nor foe. 6. Sense; judgment. He wants not wit the danger to decline. 7. Faculty of the mind. 8. Wits, in the plural, soundness of mind; intellect not disordered; sound mind. No man in his wits would venture on such an expedition. Have you lost your wits? Is he out of his wits? 9. Power of invention; contrivance; ingenuity. He was at his wits end. (Websters1828)

CHARMING – participle present tense – 1. Using charms; enchanting. 2. adjective – Pleasing in the highest degree; delighting. Music is but an elegant and charming species of elocution. (Websters1828)

CHARM – noun – 1. Words, characters or other things imagined to possess some occult or unintelligible power; hence, a magic power or spell, by which with the supposed assistance of the devil, witches and sorcerers have been supposed to do wonderful things. Spell; enchantment. Hence, 2. That which has power to subdue opposition, and gain the affections; that which can please irresistible; that which delights and attracts the heart; generally in the plural. The smiles of nature and the charms of art. Good humor only teaches charms to last.  verb transitive – 1. To subdue or control by incantation or secret influence. I will send serpents among you – which will not be charmed. Jeremiah 8:172. To subdue by secret power, especially by that which pleases and delights the mind; to allay, or appease. Music the fiercest grief can charm. 3. To give exquisite pleasure to the mind or senses; to delight. We were charmed with the conversation. The aerial songster charms us with her melodious notes. 4. To fortify with charms against evil. I have a charmed life, which must not yield. 5. To make powerful by charms. 6. To summon by incantation. 7. To temper agreeably. – verb intransitive – To sound harmonically. (Websters1828)

Concerned with Mean Excess Deficiency
pleasantness and social amusement Wittiness (Rackham)

Charming (Sachs) (eutrapelos)

Buffoonery (bõmolochia) Boorishness (bõmolochos)

–=–

For further outline and elaboration of these ten books containing these virtues and their excess or deficiency from neutrality (middle, mean, balanced state), see the wiki article, here:

Link–> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicomachean_Ethics

–=–

It is easy to confuse these terms with their legal opposites, word magic that is designed to simulate the form without the substance, to pretend good while acting badly. As an example, the legal system bestows the legal (false), flattering title of “honor” upon politicians and judges, as well as titles of supposed (pretended) nobility. One need not do anything special to be granted the flattering title of nobility, one may simply be born into it. Or, one may be hired on to the government corporations and be given such a legal title, which is a specifically defined term of art that has nothing to do with acting in honor in any way. This simulation (hypocrisy) is the nature of The Matrix story and movie franchise — a society so enamored in false, flattering titles that not one of us acts according to the title we pretend to bear. For while the words simulation and hypocrisy bear (carry) the same meaning, they are the products of very different intents. Hypocrisy is committed by a man that knows the Law of God (Nature) and continues knowingly and thus consciously to break that Law. But society today is in simulation, not hypocrisy. Simulation is committed by a man that does not know the Law of God except by name (form without substance), confused by legalism and false doctrine of state-sponsored religions, and therefore acts unknowingly and unconsciously to break the Law of God (Nature).

Which is worse? Why hypocrisy, of course, knowingly breaking the Law of Nature (God).

Which is more destructive? That would be simulation, for a simulator knows and acknowledges not his own hypocrisy, being inculturated and brainwashed by secular logic (legalism) and thus tricked into contract with the devils (attorneys/agents) of government – injured (brought into legal law) and submitted to a spiritually dead existence absent from Source (Nature). One that is ignorant, though this be no excuse, cannot be called a hypocrite. But he can be called evil, pernicious, and wanting of moral rectitude, as much as any farm animal might be labeled. For both exist in their own matrix simulation, an existence completely separate from Nature (Reality). One thing, however, is certainly clear… The ignorant simulators must be governed, for they cannot govern themselves if they do not know the Law of Nature (God). Trying to self-govern without God, without Logos (Christ, the Word of God personified), is like entering into a battle without a sword or shield. The piercing effect of legalism and mammon corrupts the empty mind, the mind devoid of knowledge. And we are certainly a people destroyed by our disgusting and purposeful lack of knowledge, our active ignorance.

(Author’s note: I just revealed the subject outline of my next book.)

It must be said that not any one of these virtues listed above can be obtained without the others. Each is like a check and balance upon which the others depend. For instance, one might be very witty and yet, without empathy, that is, without having temperance over ones words or actions, ones wit will certainly do harm to another or to oneself (self-deprecation). This dispensation of virtue is akin to having a shield against those seven deadly sins that the legal system thrives upon and invokes in each of us through its artificial matrix code. And so the worst of men rise to the top while the best of us are cowed and prevented from practicing this religious Law of virtuous ethics as religious men (non-persons). To be clear, the Law of Nature (God) is illegal in the legal system of men, for that is the purpose of having freedom from (of) religion, which means a state of possessing legal freedom from moral Law. Following the Law of God religiously is not a religion, it is conscious action and a fear of hypocrisy. The religions of men in no way require any man to follow the Law of God, and in fact require every man to break with God’s Law, the Law of Nature, in order to join and follow whatever false doctrine that “church” has printed, incorporated, and made legal (anti-God). Religion is steeped in and dependent on simulation and hypocrisy, for all its members and clergy must necessarily fall into one of these categories.

It is no irony that by doing no harm one therefore rises above and takes away all power of the legal governments of men, leaving the dealer (government) of the game without dependent, morally corrupted customers, without support, without players (citizen employees) in its organized, extortive, commercial business practices. A king, a government, and a poker dealer (tax collector) are useless and powerless actors without the multitude of weak-minded men paying them tribute by participating in their legal, permissive, monopolistic games so as to be harmful and be harmed as a defunct (spiritually dead), default lifestyle. Therefore, the legal system and its devilish law allows for, protects, and very much promotes injury and harm. To injure literally means to bring someone, some place, or some thing into law, and this usually means harm must be done to that legal (artificial) person (status), place (corporation), or thing (property). Though these are merely fictions of law (nouns/names), these pretended titles play an intricate role in this process, for they are all patented creations and property of government. The creator controls, as their well-established, ancient, legal maxim of law dictates. In other words, God controls Nature (including man) and Its Law, while governments control fiction (including the legal persons, places, and things of men) and the legal law that controls them. Through the fictional person, the man is controlled. Within the fictional place (legal jurisdiction of a municipal corporation) the person is governed (administrated). And through every false, legal claim of any thing as “property” by the fictional legal person in the fictional legal place, the man is therefore claiming that he or she holds “title” through some creation (persona) of government, and therefore the law of persons, places, and things is the highest – a false law held higher than Nature’s (God’s) Law. Ultimately this means that anyone that violates or trespasses upon that lie of fictionally entitled property must be punished, that is, harmed through extortion and pain. Forgiveness is not tolerated by we that justify, tolerate, and even worship patriotically this legal system, pretending God’s realm of Nature no longer exists when covered by a fictional, legal “property” line (artificial border) — that the Law of God’s Nature is equally defeated within that artificial boundary of legalism. Therefore, no moral action will be tolerated from any man because it’s illegal (intolerable) for a man bearing (using) a legal person (legal status) under and controlled (owned) by government to practice any form of True religious freedom (bound under moral, unwritten Law). What is legally written remains instead the foundational lie in which we trust.

A person (legal status) exists only in the legal fiction system (a fictional simulation created through legal code words), no differently than a Monopoly game game-piece only has power and status in the Monopoly game or a pawn or knight only has status as a pawn in the game of chess, being a useless trinket in Truth, that is, in Nature (under God), and having power only through the permissive (licensed) fiction that is man’s legal system of law. And so a man acting as/in legal persona (false character) can only act according to the law of persons, the law of the legal, commercial game, never the spiritual, moral Law of Nature (God). In other words, a man must tolerate everything that the government’s legal system of law requires its fictional persons (property) to tolerate, while inversely showing forced, equal, collective intolerance towards whatever government requires and considers as legally intolerable. Morals, values, spirituality, and just outright common sense are intolerable in any legal system. Why? Because these actions (not just thoughts) cannot be governed through legal means, only suppressed through rules attached to this persona (status in society). Only harm can be legally governed. And like a parasite, a vampiric ghoul, government capitalizes upon and taxes every instance of harm we do to one another, even going so far as to fill our heads with Hollywood (deceitful) entertainment that constantly promotes and features as “reality television” a host of paid, low-level, professional liars (actors) fulfilling quite scripted acts of competition and harm.

This is no game, this is the way of Nature (Jehovah). This is our actual default. Only the legal fiction prevents us from living Truly amongst one another in Love and Charity. And that fiction was created purposefully to destroy our spiritual release, our ability to Love and cherish each other as Real men, as Creations of God (Nature), entraining, educating, and tricking us into playing instead their legal game of monopolies (nations) by their artifices and false laws.

If this still doesn’t make sense, try and imagine a moral Monopoly or chess game for a moment, where the Highest rule of the game is to do no harm to any other player (man) or to the earth (Nature), where all “places” are only property of God and no other. Imagine playing Monopoly without money, without a banker (false god). Imagine if the dice had no power to move you and force you to harm (trespass) because you had no fictional character that, by the artificial (legal/man-made) law of that game, could control you through contract, bond, violence, and surety. Imagine having the Natural right and ability to travel through each pretended square of land because no legal system prevented it, and because the Law of the game is to do no harm, to forgive us our trespasses, and to love and respect one another as our neighbor and as we would expect to have done to ourselves? While this is the default Law of Nature, or in other words, what exists without the artifices of legal properties (persons, places, and things), it is only possible by conscious application (choice). It is only possible without temptation towards mammon (money and false valuation of what is Real as a fiction/name in commerce). It is only possible by men able to govern their own minds and actions, by men that hold the Highest Law not merely as a pretended belief system (religion) under a false corporate title like “Christian,” but as a lifestyle put into action at every moment of every new day. What games would we play if there was no competition? What wonders could we accomplish? What level of True Love could we experience?

Unfortunately, these questions cannot be answered while men are contracted with the dis-ease of legal personhood (status) under a false law, while inside the simulation of the legal matrix code and while entranced by the artifice of false, legally incorporated religions (belief without action). For the member of any religion is merely a citizen thereof, no different than that of a citizen of any nation, unable to ever act upon any moral law purveyed within that religion because that religion is a legal corporation bound wholly under legal law (IRS code), and the man attending that religious ceremony (game) is a legal citizen under legal (anti-God, anti-Nature) law. He that pretends, acts, and preaches falsely has no place in God’s Nature (Creation). The chess piece has no power except upon the chess board. The cartoon only exists in the cartoon realm. One cannot be a follower of the Law of God (exemplified in the story of Jesus Christ, the Law personified) and also pretend to be a legal person bound under legal law (false, antichrist doctrine). Each religion is a Monopoly board of its own, allowing empty belief in idols but preventing the ability of men to practice any moral actions as Law without license and permission from government. This false charity from religions can only serve to keep the poor in poverty, to fill the neglected belly of the hungry temporarily, without satisfaction, and provide only the illusion of shelter and love not as a duty to God, but as a gesture of empty, corporate greed (lust). Any welfare system provided by the corporate church serves only to support poverty, hunger, and homelessness, no less than the welfare system of the legal, corporate state serves only the continued base poverty level of its recipients. For money-based, corporate charity bound in anti-God legalism can never cure the ills of a society that worships and hoards the empty promise of money as its artificial god.

Government is only words on paper, and these words (false laws) are used by actors (politicians, police, etc.) in artificially flattering titles as justification to harm and injure the men who respect and therefore tolerate them as if their titles and legally licensed powers thereof are part of reality. This invisible badge of moral corruption, a public scarlet letter of moral incorrigibility called personhood (legalized adultery) and national US citizenship is expressed every time that status (legal, artificial persona) is invoked through identity (pretended sameness as a fictional character/name), such as showing a driver’s license or using a social security number. The law applies only to the person (fictional status), but the man acting in person is in a permanent state of injury (bound under legal law and sanction) by continued, assumed, permanent use (expression) of that persona (status) and the protection it tacitly imposes, being in bond and surety as a consequence of using another’s (government’s) property. Legal protectionism, that is, giving up liberty for security, replacing the choice of self-government with a legalistic prison in debt, is never a good thing.

And now, suddenly, the purpose of Thomas Jefferson’s quote above can be clearly understood. Your rulers use the premise of this quote against you, by causing you to abandon your natural (“God-given”) rights in exchange for their contracted dis-ease of legal, artificial rights. The devil (evil genius/attorneys) can only effect you when you get into contract with it. Legalism is intolerable to innocence. Satan requires harm be done so that its anti-God legalist law may govern and administrate that harm. With time or with money (which are the same thing), we all pay in the end.

Governments only have power over men that are weak-minded, ignorant, and warlike, men that cannot govern themselves, men that deny their own power and existence under God (in Nature/Reality). This unnatural state of being is purely a learned, societal behavior fomented on the “public” at large, for one cannot control (govern) he that is self-governing, unless that government first steals that man’s spiritual release and ability to practice any form of moral (unwritten, self-evident) Law. This is the absolute power behind the legal systems of men, a distinct lack of recognition and respect of the Law of Nature, the Law of God, and therefore the “God-given Rights” so often spoken about by the men that create governments. However, while they are happy to reserve these rights for themselves, the rest of us must be made to deny them and harm each other as a customary, common (vulgar) lifestyle in order that we may be ruled by the legalistic (man-made) rules of harm. We thrive on injury, because only through injury may we invoke and utilize the legal system. Without harm, it has no purpose. It cannot exist in a charitable society. It cannot thrive when forgiveness is the law. And it cannot control us unless we treat each other without love, as if we are not each other’s neighbors to love as we love ourselves. When our actions are no longer answerable only to Jehovah but to men pretending to be gods (magistrates/judges), then we no longer have Natural (God-given) rights. The second we invoke the legal system and law of men, we abandon all that is of God (Nature, the Universe), all that is the benefit of living in and speaking at all times the Truth. For God is Truth and the keeper of It. In other words, if we act like Lawless (soulless) animals then we shall be treated like Lawless (soulless) animals.

Governments, however, are not Truth. Governments exist and subsist solely on lies, on their own fictional inventions, and according to their own law. We seem to forget that every government in existence is immune from its own system of law, standing in the legal title of self-proclaimed, artificial, pretended sovereignty over its own property, its own false creation, including the persons (status in society) we pretend to be. We are told that we are each individually sovereign and yet also somehow subject to government, a blatant misnomer bordering on paradox. A man of God has only one Sovereign and it is never himself, for to have Natural (God-given) rights is to recognize Nature, that is the Universe as all True and self-evident Existence as a whole, as man’s only God (Sovereign). Nature is the only Truth. Truth is God. God is Truth. All else is manmade, and what is manmade is never Truth, never part of God, never part of or governed by Nature and Its Law. Therefore, what is manmade, including what we call persons or citizenship, is a lie. A lie is always against Truth. A lie is always against God’s Law. Lies are never part of Nature, thus never part of God. In other words, Truth is self-evident, and so Truth is the keeper of Itself, for Truth is the Nature and Law of the Universe (Jehovah). Man is part of Nature (God), part of Truth, and ultimately governed by Truth (Nature and Its Law), and so nothing manmade can be said to be part of God, for nothing manmade is part of (originated from) Nature (the Source of Truth). This is the essential foundation of law. Words are never Truth, only form without substance and without self-evidence. The Word of God is the Law of Truth, the Law (Logos) is the Son of God (Truth). The Word is the Law is the Son… these words carry the same meaning and Source. Whenever Truth is spoken, this is the Word of God. That which emanates Truth is acting in or speaking the Word of God, and is acting as a son of God, for God (Jehovah) is Truth. And one can self-evidently only have one True Origin, one Source, one Sovereign (God). All others are false (respected lies). This understanding does not require a degree, or even an education. It needs no religion or money-hungry, lust-addicted priest. It is a fundamental, self-evident Truth. It is the foundation of all Law, for the legal law only exists as that which is opposed to Truth. Life is spiritual Truth. Legal fiction is spiritual death. All persons (legal status under government) are fictions of law. All persons are dead. Persons are not of God, not Created from Nature (Universal Source). Persons are words, form without substance. Persons are Soulless…

If you think this is religion, you are hopelessly lost in the throws of legally imposed, active ignorance… dazed, and confused by the firm and fast grip of your lovelorn lips upon the teat of the false, legal gods of government (mammon).

—=—

“There is nothing more frightening than active ignorance.”

—Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

—=—

“We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light.” 

―Plato

—=—

“There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that ‘my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.” 

―Issac Asimov 

—=—

“There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn’t true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true.” 

―Soren Kierkegaard

—=—

“We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.” 

―Benjamin Franklin

—=—

“The hardest thing to explain is the glaringly evident which everybody has decided not to see.” 

―Ayn Rand, The Fountainhead

—=—

“Five percent of the people think; 
ten percent of the people think they think; 
and the other eighty-five percent would rather die than think.” 

―Thomas A. Edison

—=—

“But you can’t make people listen.
They have to come round in their own time,
wondering what happened and why the world blew up around them…

―Ray Bradbury, Fahrenheit 451

—=—

“Being ignorant is not so much a shame, as being unwilling to learn.”

―Benjamin Franklin

—=—

“An age is called Dark, not because the light fails to shine, but because people refuse to see it.”

―James A. Michener

—=—

“To surrender to ignorance and call it God has always been premature, and it remains premature today. Faith is the great cop-out, the great excuse to evade the need to think and evaluate evidence. Faith is the belief in spite of, even perhaps because of, the lack of evidence.”

―Richard Dawkins

(Author’s Note: I do not adhere to Dawkins gibberish, and would give my left nut to “debate” him, that is, educate him and his hopeless cult-following on his fallacious rhetoric and active ignorance of the Bible story and purpose. But a Truth as this, spoken by any man, cannot be ignored lest one becomes ones own enemy. His words regard only empty, corporate religions and their flatteringly-titled followers, not the self-evidence of the Truths in the Bible. His whole pedestal relies on the “strawman argument” fallacy, arguing against the false gods/idolatry and empty images that corporate “Christians” and other religions believe faithfully without proof instead of correcting those false beliefs and instructing them in the Truth of the Bible. In this way, Dawkins is not a Truth-teller but an adversary to the Truth (God). Jehovah (God) is self-evident Truth, against which there is no debating, no versions, and is not to be confused with of defined or likened to false gods and idols. Jehovah is defined as self-Evidence, self-Existence, the Universe, Nature and Its Law, of which we are all undeniably part of in Oneness. The atheist can only exist because false religions exist. The atheist argument is only against some other man’s imagination, not the Bible Law read in proper context and understanding of the intent of its language and metaphor. Dawkins is the “fool” so often referred to therein, just as I was for believing his and other’s fallacious rhetoric instead of reading and committing to due diligence regarding the Bible. His comment above only applies to men tricked into believing the false, manmade doctrines and empty images of denominated, corporate, legalized religions, and has nothing to do with the Bible itself.)

—=—

Let us be clear that the story of Jesus Christ is a timeless (non-historical) story about the most intolerant dude I can think of, violently overturning the tables of the moneychangers and abhorring all men (fools) that acted and spoke against God’s Law, the Law of Nature, the self-evident Truth. Let us also be clear that Jesus Christ is the story of you, and me, the example of God’s Law, the Law of Nature we are to follow — haters of lies, artifice, and legal fiction, and intolerable to everything not of Truth (Jehovah). No one can possibly read the Bible as Law (doctrine) while at the same time thinking so-called “Christian” thoughts about the world (globalized, institutionalized, unspiritual secularism) around us. Christ tolerated no abhorrent behavior, constantly chastising and slyly convicting all “fools” and “hypocrites” that pretended (simulated), as many of us similarly do today, to be men of God (followers of God’s Law). Nothing in the Bible (Law) promotes tolerance. In fact, the very idea of tolerance is by its nature completely against the purpose of any and every system of law, save perhaps the corrupt legal systems of men that seek socialism, communism, and in general Orwellian despotism.

Tolerance is literally moral anarchy, that is, lawlessness to all sense of morality, and poisonous to any sort of spiritually driven values any people may collectively share — the very reason for creating a legitimate (Lawful) government. In other words, once the delusion of enforced, legalized tolerance (permission-based, protected, abhorrent behaviors and lifestyles) infiltrates what otherwise was “constituted” to be an otherwise intolerant society of men that base their participation in that society firstly on a Higher, unwritten, spiritually driven purpose, all hope of maintaining an unwritten, unspoken, unenforced moral order is diminished if not crushed, and such moral behavior is even outlawed by the legalist platform of protectionism (license) for bad behavior.

—=—

“…Shouldest thou help the ungodly, and love them that hate the LORD (Jehovah)? therefore is wrath upon thee from before the LORD (Jehovah)… Take heed what ye do: for ye judge not for man, but for the LORD (Jehovah), who is with you in the judgment… for there is no iniquity with the LORD our God, nor respect of persons, nor taking of gifts… Thus shall ye do in the fear of the LORD, faithfully, and with a perfect heart.”

–2 Chronicles 19:2

—=—

The natural (common/lower class) man is a spiritual monster. His heart is where his feet should be, fixed upon the earth; his heels are lifted up against heaven, which his heart should be set on. His face is towards hell; his back towards heaven. He loves what he should hate, and hates what he should love; joys in what he ought to mourn for, and mourns for what he ought to rejoice in; glories in his shame, and is ashamed of his glory; abhors what he should desire, and desires what he should abhor.”

—Thomas Boston, quoted from: ‘Augustus Toplady, Complete Works’

—=—

To tolerate the existence of evil in men is not the same as tolerating the evils emulated in their behavior. One is to act in charity and love to all men, to tolerate them in their ignorance and deprivation, but never to allow or justify it, and certainly not to love it. The verse above explains that much of the evil of men comes from their status in society, their person. The person acts not under God’s Law but under the government (mind control) of a false god (men acting as gods/magistrates). Love the man as God’s Creation, but never the fictional persona (mask) he pretends to be.

To legalize tolerance is to make lawful that which is intolerable. To legalize tolerance, that is, to force “citizens” to accept all creeds and lifestyles in false, forced legally sanctioned equality, is to abandon the Source of Law that would otherwise allow good men to fight against that evil. In every case throughout written history, this institutionalized tolerance has but one causal effect — to cause good, moral men to become intolerable to the secularized society created by the enforced tolerance thereof. He that refuses legalized, forced tolerance of that which is immoral must necessarily be labeled as intolerable. It is this phenomenon that we are witnessing in America today, and ultimately in all “first-world” nations around the world. It is this tolerance of evil, this bearing of false love for the deadly sins of men due to their false, legally protected persona, that is the antichrist spirit.

One example of this destructive toleration can be seen in what is called as “modern” or “impressionist” art. When the artist no longer paints the world according to its True beauty and wonder, no longer wishing to extend in his art the glory and harshness of Truth, and instead chooses to reinvent Reality (Creation) from his own palate of demented, alternative perspective or some drug-induced “impressionist” revisionism, we have the perfect example of the spiritual degradation that subsists through unrestricted tolerance, and indeed the protective admiration and promotion of tolerable immorality.

—=—

But it’s the consequences of such universally established tolerance in a legalist, secularized society that are the focus of this short essay. For with such a learned, propagandized, and subsequently violently enforced legalistic tolerance shrouded upon a once morally-driven people, whose spiritual foundation and standing in the Law of Nature (God) against what is otherwise intolerable has ultimately been cowed by such licensure of permissive, illicit behavior and idolatry — this once strong foundation of like-minded people must necessarily become intolerant even toward the expression of their own, natural, moral instinct. We must deny the Truth and accept what is false. Such toxic, societal (legal) tolerance causes immorality in the actions of all men regardless of their upbringing and dissuasiveness from their knowledge and baser instinct, causing a legally-induced, almost helpless automation of the man under the false law of forced permissiveness of all that is against reason, stultifying every “citizen” (employee/agent) into inaction and eventually into a shameful feeling of powerlessness, worthlessness, and helplessness as a normal state of mind.

Nineteen Eighty-Four (as Orwell presented) is not merely an inevitable future but a predictive programming of exactly what has incrementally been happening to us, here and now. Good men are afraid to stand up against such oppressive, fallacious public outcries and politically-driven catcalls as “anti-semitic” or “racist,” silenced by social justice campaigns designed to do nothing more than stifle any debate and suppress reasonable consideration. To those acting intolerably, those tolerating evils, their acts of non-toleration through the silencing of any moral opposition is golden. Once tolerance of evil becomes law, only then may evil reign, their actions governed strictly (without choice) by the legalist devils (attorneys) that protect and represent them. And, of course, this is all by design. For the very purpose for this word “racism,” a term and concept that simply cannot be found in older dictionaries or in societal history, is for the purposes of selective intolerance hidden behind the logical fallacy of the goodness of socialistically ingrained, universal tolerance.

 

—=—

So if all black people get organized as a group of flatteringly titled “black” people (an artificial “black” persona/mask/status), which must necessarily be non-white or any other skin-color, they can then collectively as “black” persons fight racism? But, wait a minute, isn’t that the definition of racism? Wasn’t that the model of America — to create a “white” (pure-blooded) country that enslaved “black” (tainted blood) persons of any skin color? Wasn’t America a bunch of “white” European persons (pure bloodline families) that came together in “solidarity” to form a country that necessarily excluded non-pure-blooded men no matter what the skin-color?

Is this race denial? Is it race shame? The strange thing is that this manipulative social justice movement has nothing at all to do with ending this left over, eugenically-driven racial hatred, that is, hatred between the so-called races, but rather to promote a hatred of the distinction of race itself, a sort of collective delusion of self-hatred and self-denial. In other words, we are being ingrained and inculturated to consider race (family) itself as intolerable — exactly what one would expect from a United Nations world government that wishes to replace the family unit with globalist, corporate feudalism and the state as parens patriae.

—=—

“The state has a wide range of power for limiting parental freedom and authority in things affecting the child’s welfare… In fact, the entire familial relationship involves the State.”

The primary control and custody of infants is with the government.”

“There is no wider area for the exercise of judicial discretion than that of providing for and protecting the best interests of children.”

“The court stands in the position of parens patria[e] of children.”

Parens patriae,” literally “parent of the country,” refers traditionally to role of state as sovereign and guardian of persons under legal disability.”

“Pursuant to the parens patriae doctrine, ‘the primary control and custody of infants is with the government, to be delegated, as of course, to their natural guardians and protectors, so long as such guardians are suitable persons to exercise it.’ ”

“In other words, the state is the father and mother of the child and the natural parents are not entitled to custody, except upon the state’s beneficent recognition that natural parents presumably will be the best of its citizens to delegate its custodial powers… ‘The law devolves the custody of infant children upon their parents, not so much upon the ground of natural right in the latter, as because the interests of the children, and the good of the public, will, as a general rule, be thereby promoted.’ 

–Prince, 321 U.S. at 167, 64 S.Ct. at 442, 88 L.Ed. 645. (SOURCE: FindLaw’s Appellate Court of Illinois case and opinions.) -and- MEADOWS v. MEADOWS, (Aug 2008), in the “Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama”?Tillman V. Roberts. 108 So. 62; Ex parte Handley, 460 So.2d 167 (Ala.1984). -and- –Ex parte Wright, 225 Ala. 220, 222, 142 So. 672, 674 (1932). See also Fletcher v. Preston, 226 Ala. 665, 148 So. 137 (1933); and Striplin v. Ware, 36 Ala. 87 (1860), -and- Ex parte Bayliss, 550 So.2d 986, 988 n. 1 (Ala.1989) (quoting Black’s Law Dictionary 1003 (5th ed.1979)). -and- Chandler v. Whatley, 238 Ala. 206, 208, 189 So. 751, 753 (1939) (quoting Striplin v. Ware, 36 Ala. at 89) (‘ ’). (SOURCE: FindLaw’s Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama case and opinions.)

—=—

Get it? The word public means corporation (artificial family) of lower class common men (goyim) acting in legal persona because of lack of knowledge and therefore inability to govern ourselves. The nation is a corporation, and the United Nations is a bunch of nations placed under the same matrix code. But what you might not know is that another word for corporation is FAMILY — as in surrogate parent under the doctrine of master and servant (also called as volunteerism). In the terms below, the word “pleasure” when used legally means legal use of a benefit, which implies the contractual relationship between person (agent) and the state (principal). So when your son takes a joy ride, it’s always considered corporate (family) business, and the head of the corporation (family) is the responsible party for any damages…

FAMILY GROUP – Within purview of the family car doctrine, is not confined to persons related to the owner, but includes members of the collective body of persons living in his household for whose convenience the car is maintained and who have authority to use it. The children of trust settlor including an adult son are members of the settlor’s “family group” for income tax purposes. (Black4)

FAMILY USE – That use ordinarily made by and suitable for the members of a household whether as individuals or collectively. The supply of water in a municipal corporation for family use includes the supply of jails, hospitals, almshouses, schools, and other municipal institutions; id. (Black4)

MEMBEROne of the persons constituting a family; a partnership, association, corporation, guild, etc. One of the persons constituting a court, a legislative assembly, etc. A part or organ of the animal body; especially a limb or other separate part. (Black4)

FAMILY PURPOSE DOCTRINE – A doctrine that the owner of a car, who gives it over to the use of his family and permits it to be operated by the members thereof, is liable for the injuries inflicted while being operated by a member of the family. The doctrine, that the owner of an automobile purchased or maintained for the pleasure of his family is liable for injuries inflicted by the machine while being used by the members of the family for their own pleasure. The doctrine imputes relationship of principal and agent where one maintains an automobile for pleasure or other use of member of his family. It is based on theory that each family member in using such car for own pleasure is carrying out the purpose for which it is furnished, and is the owner’s agent or servant. It is founded upon principles of agency or of master and servant. It is restricted to automobiles maintained by owner for comfort, pleasure, and convenience of members of his family. A father is not liable merely because he is head of family, but the one who owns or provides the automobile is liable. A wife may be held liable for the torts of her husband under the doctrine. Agency is the very genesis of the doctrine. Grandmother standing in loco parentis to grandson was liable under the doctrine for grandson’s negligent operation of her automobile. Where wife owned automobile, husband was not liable under “family purpose doctrine,” for minor son’s negligent operation of the automobile, notwithstanding husband paid part of gasoline and garage bills… (Black4)

FAMILY CAR DOCTRINE – The doctrine rests upon the basis that the automobile is furnished by the husband in his individual capacity and as common-law head of the family for the use of the family, and not as the agent of the community. It rests on theory that operator is husband’s agent and runs automobile in husband’sbusiness”; that wife is husband’s agent in carrying out one of the purposes for which the automobile is purchased and owned. Under the doctrine, a father furnishing automobile for pleasure and convenience of family makes the use of automobile by family his business and any member of family driving automobile with father’s express or implied consent is the father’s agent and the father is liable for the member’s negligence. See, also, Family Automobile Doctrine and Family Purpose Doctrine. (Black4)

FAMILY AUTOMOBILE DOCTRINE – The doctrine is that one who owns and maintains an automobile for the general use of his household makes use of automobile for such purposes a part of his business so that any member using automobile for those purposes under general authority to do so becomes his representative, for whose negligence he is responsible. It is an extension of the principle of respondeat superior to the relation created by operation of family use automobile. See, also, Family Car Doctrine and Family Purpose Doctrine. It is based on theory that members of family were engaged in a joint enterprise or that child was agent of parents. If an automobile is owned and maintained by a family corporation for general use of a family, such as that of corporation’s manager and one of its principal stockholders, corporation may be held liable under thefamily automobile doctrineto third parties. (Black4)

FAMILY CARAutomobile used to send owner’s children to school was “family car.” (Black4)

—=—

Yes, dropping the kids off at school in the “family car” is considered an act (benefit) of commerce, done in legal persona (citizenship), as the head of or agent (member) of a legal family of US persons (a legal marriage is the incorporation of two fictional, legal persons that are both property of the state). This is the family (artificially ethnic race) of the United States, all 300+ million of us — a family (corporation) born (birthed) without love and borne (carried) through great deceit and deception. The state (national district) is the father of its national citizenships.

And now you know why the scoundrels that started the United States were called as its “fathers” (false gods), and why the Bible insists that no man call any other but Jehovah (God) as “father.”

This artificial, national family (incorporation of persons) represents a politically-driven destruction of the recognition and proudness of heritage, family history, and age-old values. It’s what one might call the New World Order (international secularism), where all men identify as fictional (legal) persons and all such fictional persons are property (corporate employees called legally as sons and daughters) of the nation (family corporation).

The false paradigm we call as racism, or what is the modernly naked, left-over, legalistic “race” classifications of the original eugenics movement used without understanding today and therefore without reason or logic behind it, as a recognition of race detached from any actual family (bloodline/heraldic) considerations, being a mostly modern construct created by Darwin’s evolutionary charting of nonsensical traits and size variations of human skulls and intelligence quotients, indeed has an organized, sinister, secular-humanist goal that is not the imaginary, fairy-tail color-blindness promoted through televised hatred and logical fallacy we see and hear all over the “news” and as entertainment on social media. Rather, this so-called racism is a being served up as a deliciously delusional blindness to reality, to the beautiful Truth of Nature, as an institutionalized arrogance and indifference to God’s Design. Race (family) has nothing to do with it, except for the intention to destroy the True meaning of that word race in the minds of men, until it is unrecognizable as a good thing… or even acknowledgeable in public and political forums as a self-evident Truth.

In case you haven’t put the pieces together yet, legal “equality” is the direct opposite of race (family). In other words, equality = incorporation. Equality is necessary to destroy actual race, that is, to destroy the Real (bloodline) family unit, in order to cause all men to identify as legal entities instead of men of God (Nature), as equalized and thus normalized national citizens — artificial sons and daughters (persons) of the nation. This methodical averaging of the brain activity of children is much like the equalizer on a sound board or stereo, where all the frequency quotients can be flattened to the same level of unique output (zero), while certain individually wanted or preferred tones or traits can be notched up to acquire the desired effect. Before certain political groups or classes can be given more rights than all the other equally normalized citizenships, the group as a whole must be made to believe they are equal, even to the point of being required to hide or not to express those differences, be they knowledge or skill-based. Once the population is flattened, only then can a minority group be made to stand out and become unequal. There is no equality without inequity, for without that which is unequal to that which is forcibly declared and entrained to be equal there would be nothing to compare said label of equality to. In other words, to create a middle or lower class there must be a higher class, lest there be nothing to be lower than.

Public school, for instance, teaches all kids equally, so that no one kid can get ahead of the rest without reprimand. One size fits all — though completely and provably a failure of logic — is the delusional paradigm of this modern, humanist pedagogy. Humanism is the false religion of the atheist, the anarchist, the spiritually dead. The big bang is the religion of science. The singularity is the religion of the futurist, who’s spirit is devoid of and opposed to his own Source. Each wants to play god in a different way, and the education system is there to further the cause of this man-as-god mind-set. And through this institutionalization of legal (artificial) equality not of men but of legal, fictional (bloodless) persons in law, the foundation is laid to cause total inequity through such institutions as civil rights, that is, special rights for special groups that suddenly aren’t in any way equal anymore to the rest of the common, legalistic family. And so the values we associate with family (race) now come from the corporation nation, not the traditional values of our True family (race). In the end, the man that through legal personhood accepts artificial, legal equality with another man’s projected legal persona can never again claim God-given, Natural rights. For the source of the legal person is not God, not Nature, and no man may commune with God when acting in a lie, when acting in legal (anti-God) persona (mask). There is only one actual definition of the legal term equality, which is that all persons of the state stand with a required and equal punishment under the law. One that acts in equality instead of in True equity deserves not equity from others, for equity requires moral choice, and acting upon moral choice in the legal (immoral) realm is illegal.

And yet, in what seems a paradox, everywhere you look in Hollywood and its governmentally sponsored and controlled viral outlets of news and entertainment media one can find only the most blatant of race-baiting, and more specifically the demonization of any modicum of “white” racial, that is, cultural ethnicity and identity. Even so-called “white” people are learning to hate themselves for being “white,” though I’ve never actually met a “white person” in my life, since legal persons are only fictions of law. If Hollywood is to be believed in its re-writing and revisionist defeat of actual history through entertainment, it was the “black” people that freed the slaves, and “white” slavery didn’t even exist, let alone the modern black-on-black slave trade in Africa and the sex-trafficking of every skin-color happening right now.

Again, racism isn’t in dictionaries before the 1900’s. Why? Because before this artificial construct of racism there was only race. You see, race means family. Bloodlines, not skin color. That which was traditionally racially-motivated was in fact family-motivated. Corporations and/or governments (States) were historically created to protect the prosperity of bloodlines of families, their family (racial) inheritance, which by their very design in Nature are, as a generalization, often similar in skin-color. Race is indeed a generic term until it is purposefully, intentionally applied to some thing.

Webster defined it as it was in 1828:

RACE – noun – [Latin radix and radius having the same original. This word coincides in origin with rod, ray, radiate, etc.] 1. The lineage of a family, or continued series of descendants from a parent who is called the stock. A race is the series of descendants indefinitely. Thus all mankind are called the race of Adam; the Israelites are of the race of Abraham and Jacob. Thus we speak of a race of kings, the race of Clovis or Charlemagne; a race of nobles, etc. Hence the long race of Alban fathers come. 2. A generation; a family of descendants. A race of youthful and unhandled colts. 3. A particular breed; as a race of mules; a race of horses; a race of sheep. Of such a race no matter who is king. 4. A root; as race-ginger, ginger in the root or not pulverized. 5. A particular strength or taste of wine; a kind of tartness… (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary Of The English Language)

RACISM/RACIST – ??? – Sorry, those terms haven’t been created by the communists yet.

—=—

Should we stop referring to the color of a “Yellow Lab” because the “Black Lab” might be offended by the Truth of the color of its fur?

Should we stop distinguishing bell peppers by their color because they all taste the same?

Racism is not specifically defined in this 1828 dictionary because in the minds of men of old there was no such thing. There was only family, cousins, genealogy, heraldry, and the fact that whole countries and cultures were set up (incorporated) and based therefore on these blood-based “family values” across the world. And they still are. America was certainly no exception to this rule, though perhaps the first family to be intentionally overcome (planned) by its own immigration policies in order to create the notion of a new global world (secular humanist) order. It is certainly not a “racist” action to attempt to protect ones own moral fabric of society created from the like-mindedness of a family (race) of men from the influence and degradation caused by the acceptance and toleration of different races (family bloodlines) that have differing or even completely opposing family values, religious notions, and moral codes. Yet to call men of moral character based on such racial (family) tradition as “racist,” that is, those that wish to preserve the very ideals of the foundation and reason behind the original forming of a political body (State), can only be labeled as exactly what it is — intolerance. Today’s modern construct of so-called “racism” is a weapon of purely political motivation, used vehemently and ironically without prejudice to foment the intolerance of Real family so as to make the “State” the father, the head of the corporation (artificial, surrogate, legal family), and especially the destruction of such traditional family (race-based) values. To destroy a society, a culture, and ultimately the law and ability of a blood-related private people to enjoy the benefits of family and Natural liberty based on moral, self-Evident Law, one only need to project the active ignorance of Eugenic race bias into the common, dumbed-down population base so that they turn against one another, so that every neighbor is thine enemy, a competitor, and a threat to some empty idol of the god of skin-color and mammon. Ultimately, the goal of the men behind these eugenic ideals is to impose a universal, legally induced (figurative/artificial) persona of corruption of blood in all men regardless of skin-color, or what the constitution calls as “attainder,” and therefore to establish a global citizenship that requires the taking away of liberty and the power to self-govern through surrender to one of many corporation nations (the voluntary taking of the mixed, legal surname over the Christian name to render a legal persona). He that cannot show his bloodline, that his blood is of God (of Nature), of a Real Family (Race) of God, and not the legal state (artificially birth-certified and registered to the district/Caesar), is therefore a slave of the State (fictional creator of legal persons). For persons have no blood, and their creator god is only man’s government. Only through legal persona (mask/status) can we all be made into the humanistic race of adam, banned from the Garden and doomed to suffer the wrath of disobeying the Law of Nature (God). The word adam in the Bible translates to mankind, by the way, or in other words all men not spiritually free of the world (artificial construct) of man’s design. Adam (mankind) is man fallen, those entrapped in the anti-God legal matrix. The story of Adam as a singular man is a personification of all men, personification being the only way to tell such a story of moral teaching. We are all acting as adam did, biting into the apple (fig) of artificial knowledge (information), the concepts, lies, and inventions of man that go against the Law and Design of Nature (God). The metaphor is beautiful and instructive when read correctly and applied to oneself.

But the race-baiting politicians and other deceitful entertainers (professional, paid liars) seek to divide so as to conquer, to oppose all moral Law, and to cause you to do the same. To do this, all that might disagree must be labeled as racist, just like Lenin intended the fallacious title to be used. And finally, when each “side” of the now equalized debt-slaves are too afraid to speak, and when our hatred of each side is the guiding principal behind policy and entertainment, then the laws of forced equality can be made firm, and we all become like a deranged triangle, where each side blames the other for the shape we are in though never actually seeing any side but ones own.

Yet all the sides of a triangle are equal, aren’t they?

The point is not to bring us together, but to force us together when such a disposition is impossible in Nature. This constant recreation of forced turmoil by folding the different cultural and often opposing laws and religious moral foundations is the total opposite of what the Bible instructs. We are supposed to leave Babylon, not force it into legal existence, and certainly not to tolerate such destruction of our moral, foundational heritage and counterbalancing, spiritual Law. We are supposed to preserve and enforce the Moral Law, not allow it to be mixed and tainted by other cultural, legal, and religious influences. But hey, such moral reactions would be labeled fallaciously as “racist” in these strange days.

—=—

“You know, to just be grossly generalistic, you could put half of Trump’s supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. Right? [Laughter/applause]. The racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic — you name it. And unfortunately there are people like that…”

–Hillary Clinton

—=—

Intolerance is tolerance…

Should the average “American” be tolerable to these flattering titles of opposing lifestyles, as that which absolutely defeats and opposes the moral (unwritten) standard of conduct? If so, then what use is it to have a country and law in the first place? What is a country created for but to ensure a like-minded people sharing a system of law and culture exclusive of all other lifestyles and systems be protected in that moral belief system? Should the foundation of Bible Law as common law be forgotten or ignored to make room for a completely different and opposing system of law and religion, just so the appearance of intolerance can be pretended not to exist in the minds of “American” men? And come to think of it, what country, state, or nation in the history of the world has ever not been xenophobic or consequently been destroyed by its sudden tolerance of outside political and religious influence? Wikipedia explains that xenophobia is:

“…the fear and distrust of that which is perceived to be foreign or strange.[1][2] Xenophobia can involve perceptions of an ingroup towards an outgroup and can manifest itself in suspicion of the activities of others, and a desire to eliminate their presence to secure a presumed purity and may relate to a fear of losing national, ethnic, religious, linguistic, cultural, social class or racial identity.[3]…”

—=—

Isn’t that the purpose of starting an organized structure of society? Isn’t that the purpose of creating a corporation, its bylaws, and its leaders? In other words, isn’t every country, every tribe, every “people,” and for that matter every family (race) by default steeped in xenophobia? Can a race exist without racism? In other words, can race exist without being prideful and proud of what that race (family) is specifically because it is different than all others? Can one man call another man a racist without acknowledging the fact that his idea of racism stems from being a different race than he that he calls as racist? Can we really deny the existence of race so as to not appear to be racist, when the Truth of the matter is that we cannot help or quit being of a race (family) in the first place? Do you believe that the denial of the existence of race somehow alters the fact that we are all of different races (families/bloodlines)? Do you not see the trickery here? Do you not see the social engineering being foisted upon you so that you have no power to defend yourself as part of a race (family), and therefore have no power to act morally or from the Moral Law of Nature, because you can no longer identify with your own family (race) values? Do you not see that this is all designed to steal your soul away from Nature, away from your Source?

For better or worse, all of these constructs, from countries to religions, are artificial families (corporations) that have instilled their own artificial (legally derived) family values as law from the actual family (race) that started them. Only tolerance of the intolerable, those that act purposefully against the founding family (race) values, can destroy the country. And the greatest tool to manage such a hostile takeover is the good old manipulation of Christian tolerance. Not balanced, educated tolerance with all other virtues, but the artificial kind that is enforced by legal law — the kind that has allowed countless opposing religions and legal systems to be legally protected by government as they attempt to destroy and change the entire structure of law, religion, and family (race) values that made America what it is. Good or bad, right or wrong, whatever all countries around the world have become, their strengths and weaknesses, are solely to be blamed on the race (family) that created and continues to sustain them. If the race (family) is driven out of its own creation, the country no longer exists except in empty name only.

Now riddle me this… What country in history was not built on a distrust and fear of other cultures? What country is ever not foreign to another? There simply is no such thing as a non-foriegn country. And it is a much quoted subject that the man or country of men without fear of interference is certain to fail, and will ultimately be assimilated into another in just a few short generations. In other words, a People (family) that tolerates another way of life and law must necessarily lose their own, for two opposing forces must, by their nature, repel each other. If this isn’t clear, try pushing two magnets together the wrong way. They must be forced together, and the repulsion will never actually cease, and so neither can the executive military force behind it. We must be bound by the invisible chains of legalistic law in order to merge all cultures, all systems of law and religion into one global society, one soulless, bloodless family of the fallen adamites. This is like blowing up a balloon past its elastic capacity, knowing it will explode from the pressure of being forced to accept more than it can tolerate. I guess the balloon is therefore racist against certain air? Those enforcing this artificial tolerance know exactly what the result will be, and the United Nations was set up to govern the madness and spiritually dead order out of chaos they are instilling.

I want you to really consider this statement by the former first lady (of the Royal American bloodline) for a moment. More to the point, consider its holier-than-thou source. Hillary Clinton is part of the royal family, that is, the bloodlines of European nobility and kings, just as her husband (cousin) is, and just as every president and vice-president that has ever been placed by congress into the United States corporation is. In other words, Clinton’s power is a direct result of her race, her “white-blooded” (pure) family line, which by her own choice of words makes her the most “racist” figure in that room! What are the queens and kings of Europe if not one big, unhappy family (race)? And what are all of us to them if not tolerated, deplorable goyim?

The following are all a single race (family bloodline). They are not different races, only different corporations held under the same family estate. And, like the United States, they are all organized by a constitution. Constitutions are a dime a dozen, sorry… And they’re all hereditary in their lines of succession, or in other words, it’s all in the family (race). There are no heirs if there is no race (family). You really have to be a fool to believe that the United States president is not also in actuality another family minion upon this list. Trump is as “white” as they come, because in their world, the word white means a pure-blooded royal descendent of the kings of the following kingdoms:

State
Type
Succession
Dynasty
Title
First-in-line
 Kingdom
of Belgium
Constitution
Hereditary
Saxe-
Coburg and Gotha
King
Prince Philippe of Belgium, Duke of Brabant cropped.jpg
Heir apparent: Princess Elisabeth, Duchess of Brabant (eldest child)
Denmark Kingdom
of Denmark
Constitution
Hereditary
Glücksburg
Queen
Dronning Margrethe II (crop).jpg
Heir apparent: Crown Prince Frederik(eldest child)
 Principality
of Liechtenstein
Constitution
Hereditary
Liechten-stein
Sov. Prince
Fürst Hans-Adam II. von und zu Liechtenstein.jpg
Heir apparent: Hereditary Prince Alois (eldest son)
 Grand Duchy
of Luxembourg
Constitution
Hereditary
Bourbon
Grand Duke
Henri of Luxembourg in Brazil 28Nov07.JPG
Heir apparent: Hereditary Grand Duke Guillaume (eldest child)
 Principality
of Monaco
Constitution
Hereditary
Grimaldi
Sov. Prince
Albert II Monaco (2008).jpg
Heir apparent: Hereditary Prince Jacques (only legitimate son)
 Kingdom of
the Netherlands
Constitution
Hereditary
Orange-Nassau/
Amsberg
King
Koning-willem-alexander-okt-15-s.jpg
Heir apparent: Princess Catharina-Amalia, Princess of Orange (eldest child)
 Kingdom of Norway
Constitution
Hereditary
Glücksburg
King
President Medvedev with King Harald V of Norway big225593 (crop).jpg
Heir apparent: Crown Prince Haakon (only son)
 Kingdom of Spain
Constitution
Hereditary
Bourbon
King
Felipe de Borbón en Ecuador.jpg
Heir presumptive: Princess Leonor, Princess of Asturias (elder daughter) [II]
 Kingdom of Sweden
Constitution
Hereditary
Bernadotte
King
Carl XVI Gustaf.jpg
Heir apparent: Crown Princess Victoria (eldest child)
 United Kingdom of
Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Constitution
Hereditary
Windsor
Queen
Elizabeth II greets NASA GSFC employees, May 8, 2007 edit.jpg
Heir apparent: Prince Charles, Prince of Wales (eldest son)

—=—

Yes, those subjects of royalty also have a constitution, you know, that thing you as a national citizenship as a status (property) created by congress has been tricked into worshiping even though it has nothing to do with you under that common, lower-class status of denizened personhood? But they are at least smart enough on some level not to worship that constitution as anything but what it is, a form of idolatrous worship of false gods mediated by magical, legal terms of art to give the appearance of some pretended state of independence, while keeping intact the “royal prerogative” and war powers of the king and queen (head of church and state) of the Crown Corporation and its realms of debt-slaves. Even some Canadians actually think they (as subjects) are not under the power of the queen, that the corporation of “Canada” is not part of that royal corporation sole ruled under the Crown. They at least know, if even in doubt of their own disposition, that they are subjects of a sovereign corporation headed by a false god (king/queen/prince). In America, though as a nation it clearly and openly calls itself sovereign under the law of nations and refers to we the common citizenships as its subjects and customers, we somehow have instilled in ourselves a false-sense of artificial detachment, of freedom from tyranny. We are like a single goldfish in a bowl that believes itself to be somehow sovereign from the man that feeds us and changes our piss and shit-filled water, without whom we would suffocate in our own excrement. We lie to ourselves and teach those unreasonable lies to our children without question, and as children we believe our own lies even after we grow out of most other childhood fantasies. We figure out that Santa Clause and the Easter Bunny aren’t real, but continue to fool ourselves that we are a naturally free people even as we use and claim the protection of the legal property (status in personhood) of the United States government and pay its tax (tribute to Caesar). God created men. Governments create persons. Big difference!

Perhaps you have forgotten or been brainwashed out of knowing what some of these words actually mean?

HEIR-APPARENT – noun – The man who, during the life of his ancestor, is entitled to succeed to his estate or crown. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary Of The English Language)

HEREDITARY – adjective –  1. That has descended from an ancestor. He is in possession of a large hereditary estate. 2. That may descend from an ancestor to an heir; descendible to an heir at law. The crown of Great Britain is hereditary. 3. That is or may be transmitted from a parent to a child; as hereditary pride; hereditary bravery; hereditary disease. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary Of The English Language)

PRINCE – noun – prins. [Latin princeps.] 1. In a general sense, a sovereign; the chief and independent ruler of a nation or state. Thus when we speak of the princes of Europe, we include emperors and kings. Hence, a chief in general; as a prince of the celestial host. 2. A sovereign in a certain territory; one who has the government of a particular state or territory, but holds of a superior to whom he owes certain services; as the princes of the German states. 3. The son of a king or emperor, or the issue of a royal family; as princes of the blood. In England, the eldest son of the king is created prince of Wales… (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary Of The English Language)

—=—

If the prince (or president) is a sovereign, and you are its subject, then you are not sovereign.

Worst of all, you have either forgotten or choose to remain actively ignorant of the fact that the sovereign royalty of America is of the same bloodlines (family) as the royalty of these European rulers. You choose to casually ignore the most race-oriented regime of corporations (nations) in the world, in all of history, the royal houses that lay claim to most of the (secular) world. You pretend that elections are fair, and that just anyone, from any race/family (bloodline) can become president. And nowadays, with such horrific race-baiting being pushed in all forms of entertainment and media, you are being entrained to believe in the fallacy that only “white” skinned people are in power. In other words, in stead of realizing the truth about the completely race-orientated royal bloodlines (families) that rule every nation, we are all being tricked into blaming all problems created by those exclusive (actual racist) bloodlines (presidents, vice-presidents, congress, corporate CEO’s, etc.) on the color of skin, completely missing the actual problem that is the respect of such royal (uncorrupted) bloodlines. All blood in reality is red when it’s visible to the Truth of the open air without legal (anti-God) consideration, not white or black. We are ruled by one race (foreign family) of men (heirs) according to heraldic, genealogical heritage, and we don’t even know it’s happening. Instead, this family of absolutely corrupt “royals” confuses and obfuscates from this reality by convincing the black people that its all the white people’s fault, the brown people that its all the yellow people’s fault, and the white people that its every other color’s fault. But the Truth is that none of this has anything to do with skin-color and everything to do with the actual meaning of the word “race.” Race is not determined by skin color, but by bloodline (family). “We, the People” is not us, white or black. It is a select bloodline, a family of men enjoined and working together to suppress, control, and extort in every way imaginable the rest of the common population of Earth. And that includes all skin-colors, with no regard to race (family). In fact, the whole idea and purpose of national citizenship is to pretend destruction, that is, legal corruption (attainder) of the blood and therefore bloodline and blood-rights of all other men not in the so-called royal family. No blood, no God-given rights, for they are inherent only to free men, not subjects in false persona (national citizenships).

Perhaps you’ve never considered that there is no such thing as a “people” in Nature? There was no people of England until it was invented. There were no Americans until America was legally created. All so-called people (a legal title) are inventions of men. And so any incorporation of “people” that supposedly exists is necessarily a fraud, illegitimate, and certainly not a Creation of Nature (God). Perhaps you never thought to ask the question as a United States citizenship just who “We, the People” actually is? Perhaps you’ve never realized that a subject of the United States is therefore a subject of whomever “We, the People” happen to be? Trust me, you would know if you were one of them, that is, one of their race (bloodline), for you would be declaring such racism in order to be part of that elite (upper-class) band of race-driven rulers of the rest of us.

To be clear, this is the epitome of True racism, and is, in fact, the only Real racism that exists in the world. It’s called royalty. Nobility. Heraldry. Genealogy. Elitism. The upper-class. And only they are considered as “white” because the meaning of this word white in legalese refers to the purity of blood as it relates only to the royal, inheritable (family) bloodline and therefore the line of blood-right succession, not skin color. Again, I tell you that Barack Obama is “white” according to legal law, being a direct descendent of the Royal family (race), as are most “black” skinned actors and politicians that are of that bloodline. You think Hally Barry isn’t considered “white” ??? LOL! Every one of them is in line for the throne, down to the last and most distant legitimately blood-linked cousin. In other words, to be a member (cousin) of the “legitimate” royal family (bloodline) is to stand as an inheritor of the corporations created by them, which they call as their kingdoms. As a common citizen of any nation, no man is actually considered as a “white” man, for the very conception of citizenship to a nation requires the forfeiture and attainder of such consideration by blood-right (God-given rights) in exchange for legal (artificial) rights. The goal is to turn all men of all races not royal unto the identity of legal persons (fictions without blood).

This modern conceptualization of racism is designed to do one and only one thing — to destroy the family unit, and therefore to destroy what is known as family values. But this sinister effort is only designed for the common citizenships of nations. The royal families exist behind the scenes, hidden beyond the corporate administrative state set up to control the plebes. Even today the queen of England pretends to be honorary, ceremonial, and not in charge of the “constitutional monarchy” that is the United Kingdom and Union. The further out of sight the hidden royal hand can exist, the more powerful it becomes.

We have no idea what it means anymore when we see signs that point to “private land” or a “private road” ahead, only that we are not supposed to go there. We only know that we would be trespassing if we did. Yet we have no idea that such a sign represents a different jurisdiction, a different realm of landholding bloodline families. We only know that we are not part of that family. And we treat that invisible border across that private land the same way we treat the US border, respecting that what lies beyond is unwelcoming, foreign territory we need permission to tread upon.

The very definition of an individual estate, country, nation, or state is that it’s foreign to all others. All 50 States are foreign to the United States (the district of Washington/New Columbia). Again, in this word foreign we garner that the law is private and strict, and therefore totally intolerant of any other culture or law — intolerant, in other words, of any other People (State) except by contract (constitution/compact/treaty, etc.). This is, for all intents and purposes, the way of the world in every country, culture, and creed (belief system). They that create a State (incorporated, private/foreign People) are always, without exception, a bloodline (family) of men. The formation of a nation is by definition the formation of an ethnicity, the creation of a new artificial “race” (legal family/corporation) of men separate and foreign to what we call as the human race. Man is not human. What is human is that which belongs to men, such as the human anatomy. Humans are not creations of God, of Nature, for the word human is manmade, a scientific classification no different that equine, feline, or canine. To be human is to be the property of man, not a man. To be referred to as a human is to be considered only as an animal, or in other words and by their own definition, as that which has no soul, a thing without self-anima, a thing without (outside of) God’s Realm and Law. The human soul does not belong to a human, it belongs to a man. What is of man is a human quality, but no man is human. To be a “human being” is to act in humanism. To be a man is to be a Creation of God. Human is only ever a property (quality/trait) of man, never the actual man. A People is never a man, for to be part of a people is to be something artificial, something that is invented by and therefore belongs to man, not God. No man is a people, for the word people is a plural. To be part of a people is to no longer be a man of God. This distinction is the foundation of the difference between moral and civil law. Civil law is for people, while moral law is only for men. The moral law must always be held higher, by all men, than that of the legal, civil law of any people he may be voluntarily a part of. It is this distinction, this protective cloak of spiritual, moral Law that has been lost to God’s people. When the foundation of anything fails, the super-structure built upon it must also, self-evidently fall. This is a maxim of law.

The funny thing is that when a person (subject) of the United States is sued, we get a letter from “the People of” whatever State that court is in. We, whom aren’t the people, know without question that we aren’t the people simply because we are sued by the people. The people don’t sue the people, because the people is a single, legal corporation. There is only one people, and it obviously ain’t us. This gets confusing because the general term “people” is used to describe us, as the common people. But the People in the constitution is only referring to the incorporation of that specific “white” the race (bloodline family) as a specific, exclusive “People” (capitalized), not the common goyim.

This private, non-ethnic status of royal privilege, by definition, requires a certain “purity” of blood, in heraldic and genealogical terms of construction. No State (People) exists without this racial (family) background in the world. This is why traditionally we would expect to see Japanese looking people in Japan, Chinese looking people in China, and Scandinavian looking people in the Scandinavian countries. This is not vulgar racism as is promoted to common goyim. This is the True meaning of race. Without race (family), one has no State (private People). And without a private People (State), one has no reason to track and keep record of pure (white) blood. And this is the very opposite of national (mixed) ethnicity (national identity). For the royal families of Africa and Thailand, I assure you, have white (pure) blood despite their dark complexion according to their heraldic records. Pure blood, of course, doesn’t actually exist. It merely refers to the active recording of genealogical records in heraldry, no different than any corporation is structured to reflect a president, vice president, and all the line of succession by blood relation. To be clear, I know no man that does not seek to pass on his inheritance to his bloodline child (issue). In other words, you are equally as guilty of invoking this false, proprietary lineage as any royal. Only the scope and size of the commercial transaction of inheritance is different. In this way, we must acknowledge the fact that we are all in fact racist, which ultimately means nothing at all in Nature (Reality), only that we wish the best for our own children (family bloodline).

But you must understand the difference between your status as a national citizenship (commercial vessel) and those private, royal rulers of that persona (property). You have been tricked and continuously brainwashed into believing that your family is the nation (corporation) you were born into. And you identify your race by that nation. There is no such think as Japan or China or Mexico in Nature. These are corporations created by private families (races). Ethnicity is simply not what you believe it to be. Ethnicity can only be understood from the perspective of master and slave. If you ask a slave what slave-master’s estate he belongs to, he would tell you the family name of his master. So too does a citizenship of any nation identify his origin by the nation he was birthed (registered/taxed) into. And so, to us, it seems perfectly reasonable to identify ourselves as “Americans” or as “Englishmen” or as “African.” This is no different than saying I am an employee (agent) of “Walmart” or “Target” corporation. A nation is an artificial construct, a fake family (race), made solely of persons (fictional characters). The fact that you have been entrained to identify yourself by your ethnicity (nationally spoken language) is a cosmic joke, for the whole reason behind such identity (pretended sameness as fiction) is to taint your bloodline (family), to take you out of Nature and place you in attainder (corruption of blood) so that you can and must be governed by the governments (mind control) of nations. Yet, as I’ve written about extensively, these royal families (races) are not of the nations. They created the nations as holding companies for we, their debt-enslaved goyim. They are private (foreign) and sovereign from all nations. Most importantly, to identify yourself by ethnicity is to remove yourself from God (Nature). It is to cause you to deny God as your Source of Existence and Law, and thus cause you to worship false idols and gods (magistrates). I am not American, I am of the Universe (Jehovah). But to the royal families (race), we are all just one color, the color of corruption, which is the color of heathens. We are all the color black to them…

ETHNOLOGY – noun – [Gr. nation, and discourse.] A treatise on nations. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary Of The English Language)

ETHNICAL – adjective – [Latin ethnicus; Gr. from nation from the root of G. heide, heath, woods, whence heathen. See Heathen.] Heathen; pagan; pertaining to the gentiles or nations not converted to christianity; opposed to Jewish and Christian. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary Of The English Language)

ETHNIC – noun – A heathen; a pagan. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary Of The English Language)

ETHNICISM – noun – Heathenism; paganism; idolatry. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary Of The English Language)

HEATHEN – noun – [Gr. from heath, that is, one who lives in the country or woods, as pagan from pagus, a village.] 1. A pagan; a Gentile; one who worships idols, or is unacquainted with the true God. In the Scriptures, the word seems to comprehend all nations except the Jews or Israelites, as they were all strangers to the true religion, and all addicted to idolatry. The word may now be applied perhaps to all nations, except to Christians and Mohammedans. Heathen, without the plural termination, is used plurally or collectively, for Gentiles or heathen nations. Ask of me, and I will give thee the heathen for thine inheritance. Psalms 2:8. Heathen, however, has a plural, expressing two or more individuals. If men have reason to be heathens in Japan– The precepts and examples of the ancient heathens. 2. A rude, illiterate, barbarous person. – adjective – Gentile, pagan; as a heathen author. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary Of The English Language)

—=—

The reference to Christians above is not a reference to the false denominations of corporate, legalist religions set up by the state to deceive and distract you from the True meaning of God and the Bible, but is a title placed on those that cannot and will not become part of the nations of men because they choose to follow only the Law of God, not men. These are the True followers of Christ, who understand that Christ is the Law (Word) of God, not a mere idol to worship as a false god. To be called a “Christian” while at the same time be called a citizen of any nation is to be exactly the fool they want us all to be, having two flattering titles that are diametrically opposed to one another, representing two completely opposing systems of law. This is how to create chaos, and then construct a legal, secular system of order from it.

So that this concept of bloodline as race is clear, please consider that the current, hereditarily acquired “black-skinned” kings of the kingdoms of Morocco, Eswatini, and Lesotho in Africa are by their very assent to the thrown racist. They are in power because of their bloodline (race), which must be understood to be legally considered as “white” in legal (artificial) color, meaning pure-bred from their own royal race (People/family) that reigned before them. And waiting in the wings are eager, blood-related men seeking to take that throne away from their brother, sister, father, or cousin. Race is power. Racial discrimination is the center of that power, and is the very difference between common, national citizenships and the People (State) that rules over them. Without race, there would be no countries, no kingdoms.

Just what do you think Game Of Thrones is about, anyway?

(Hint: In that show, those are cousins having sex with and entering into arranged marriages with direct, pure bloodline cousins to carry on the “royal” pretended-to-be-legitimate line of succession, and killing each other in order to claim hereditary blood-right as heir-apparent to those various, interrelated thrones, as head of those corporations. It’s a fictional show about the actual fiction of pretended royal families that still rule over us corrupted, tainted-blood commoners today. It’s all part of training you to remain under the illusionary power and control of their self-proclaimed superior race, by fictionalizing and pretending such things don’t actually exist anymore, not since dragons roamed the earth. And unicorns. Corporations are ruthless… because it’s always been all in the family. Royalty is just a sophisticated mafia family, organized crime under the guise of the magic and trickery that is rebranded as the prestige of royal blood.)

Now, where does this leave the race-baiting meme of so-called “white” privilege?

Imagine if I went to Japan and entered a Japanese family’s house (a term that means family or race) and exclaimed that they have “red privilege.” Or how about I go to Iran and claim that those families of the same race have “brown privilege.” How about the “yellow privilege” of the main families in China? Yet we have been entrained to accept that the people of Denmark and America have “white privilege” despite every other imagined colored race in the world. Meanwhile, we are all being extorted and seriously screwed over in so many ways by the only actual race of “People” that are still able to claim their bloodline (family/race) as the private founding families of the States (People) united. They’ve made us equal in our enslavement with the right hand while using the left hand to focus our attention on each other instead of the Source of our collective despotism, which we have been fooled into thinking is the price of freedom. And now, by turning this non-existent concept of racism into a so-called legal “hate-crime,” we now have the veritable legal tool to cause each other harm by turning this fallacy of race (family) into a dirty word, and by punishing anyone that acknowledges it. Again, this is the only way we can be governed legally, if we do harm and injure (bring into false, legal law) each other for non-crimes that are legally (artificially) imposed on nonsensical terms like “racist” hate crimes.

How do you destroy a People, a family, that bases its society on “family values?”

You do exactly what these royal bloodlines have done to us — destroy the ability of men to claim to be part of a family. If you take away race (family) from a man, you necessarily take away his ability to practice in action any form of family (race) values. And in their place, we must be convinced to voluntarily accept and thus tolerate all that is opposed to and that is actively-at-war-with our family (race), leaving us defenseless (without the ability to bear heraldic Arms of our families) against the legal matrix simulation. War and peace have no distinction, for either way the commerce of the gods of mammon shall be done. Amen. War is a very profitable commercial transaction, with instant rewards. Peace just takes a little longer to reach such profit levels.

Since the True meanings of these words have been lost on most of us as we are entertained and entranced with lies and propaganda about how we are all racist and shameful even though we are all considered legally (artificially) equal under the law as tainted, blood-corrupted debt-slaves, regardless of skin-color, we fail to recognize the difference between a nation (commercial corporation) and a State (private, incorporated People). Many of us call ourselves as “Christians” but are “unacquainted with the True God” because corporate religion is merely empty idol worship – the worship of the form of symbols, statues, heroes, saviors, fictional personas, flattering titles, and saints without substance, without actually obeying the Law of God, that is, without ever being or becoming Christ-like as instructed. This is (we are) what they of the private, royal bloodlines (race) call as heathenism, paganism, the lower class of goyim. Those that are citizenships in any nation (corporation) can only be gentiles, for they (we) follow the legal law above and most often against that of the Law of Nature (God’s Law/Word). This is not religion, this is law. This is the way the legal system works, causing voluntary attainder (legal, fictional corruption of blood), which causes class division, as those who claim blood-right (the right to Bear family Arms) and those who have rescinded that right in order to accept replacement legal rights granted and enforced by the still lawfully recognized families (races). This is every nation. The actual pre-modern Jews, as mentioned here, had no nation, which is why they were a free people and, having no nation, were called “the international jew.” The nation of Israel, unlawful and illegitimate as it is, is not full of Jews, it is full of goyim that call themselves as “Jews” just as this supposedly Christian nation of America is full of goyim that call themselves as “Christians.” No follower of Christ (God’s Law) would take a false god or its false legal (e.g. civil) law (doctrine) above that of the Law of Nature (God). In fact, that is the very aspect that confirms one is a True follower of Christ, one that in his or her actions is Christ-like, and therefore in all ways intolerable to the legal systems and nation of men acting in legal persona (anti-God). Likewise, the Native American Indian tribes and other aboriginal free peoples were never conquered (purchased) until they agreed to become “nations” instead of free tribes. To be an Indian nation is to abandon the Indian culture and life to become just another ethnic class of lower-class goyim (heathen gentiles). The citizenships of Israel today, as well, are persons of the nation, not free men of and under God. They have fallen for the oldest trick in the book, thinking that being a member of the so-called “Jewish” nation of Israel (a legal corporation) is synonymous with being and acting like Israelite from the Bible. It is the same with the “Cristians” that believe that being a follower of Christ (God’s Law) is the same as being a member of a “Christian” nation or false, legally derived religion (corporation). A nation is the perfect example of Orwell’s meme that freedom is slavery, as all men enjoined in citizenship to any nation are its debt-slaves, free to choose their mode of employment (being used) as a commodity in a neo-feudalistic human capital management system (capitalism). The point is that every nation is run by some bloodline of men, some hereditarily conjoined club of “royal” (upper-class) rulers that remain private (foreign) from that nation in their own State (private People). In other words, we are all ruled by tolerated racism.

You can say it till you’re red in the face, but the statistics always paint a different picture…

Racism is a lie told to those not of the royal, master race,
in order to hide their own institutionalized, millennium-old heredity-based racism, by focusing all goyim on a war between cultural differences, which are falsely attributed to skin-color so as to keep us busy fighting each other instead of they that enslave us.

The truth is that every one of us are equal, that is, equally under their spell…

They look like us, but once you see these royal “families” for what they are, you realize that the lie of cultural, ethnic racism is only skin deep. Black or white, or anywhere in between, we are all trapped in the lower, vulgar class they created for us, for all of our blood has been turned black, our True Nature tainted, our souls corrupted. It is amusing to think of a white slave and a black slave arguing over who is more enslaved, using only skin-color to determine what is otherwise self-evident. For Orwell seems to have shortened one of his equative, dystopian maxims…

Equality is Slavery. Slavery is Freedom. Freedom is equality. Repeat.

If equality is slavery and slavery is freedom, then freedom is slavery.
It’s simple math.

And what is equality but forced tolerance?

And what is forced tolerance but institutionalized intolerance of any individual cultural strength and unity, a culture of cultural hate?

Still don’t get it?

This cultural neutering, the making impotent of cultural custom through equalization, is the same as allowing the common people to worship (think about) God however they see fit, but never to actually act on the moral law that scriptures teach. In other words, it is literally illegal to practice moral law.

You cannot be Christian (a follower of Christ/God’s Law) and also be under an opposing, legal system of law (false doctrine/law). A Christian, by definition, cannot tolerate anything legal (man-made law), for legal law is always, 100% opposed to (the undoing of) the Law of Nature (God). One can’t live according to truth (God) at all times and also adhere to the lies of legalism. Likewise, no culture can possibly be tolerable of the influence and immigration of another, especially when the customs and laws are different and opposed to each other.

Legal equality means we are all equally punishable under the legal law, and have no right to use, act under, or invoke the moral law (God). Freedom of religion is intolerable to a man of God, for the Law of Nature never changes. The Law of Nature (God) is not religion. Religion is part of man’s creation, not God’s.

And once you see them for what they are, you suddenly lose all tolerance and respect for them. Only the law they created to control us, to cause us to harm one another instead of loving each other — only the delusion of their artifice of esteem and legal, class-based status protects them from us… only the illusion they cast:

–=–

You want proof of our equality, that poverty and despotism is colorblind, then go to your local homeless shelter. Go to your local tent city. Go to your local food locker. See the equality oozing from the disenfranchised and start doing something to change it. Or are you too good for that lower class… kinda like they are too good for your class? Go tell those “white” people that they have “white” privilege and see what happens!

These bodies politic (incorporated “People”) were created not as legal entities but as a stock of people related by blood. Their created nations are designed to hold not their own stock, but the common live-stock of we gentiles (goyim), that is, we that are born into the heathen, idolatrous nations. Have we forgotten that the very concept of the various immigration policies of every country in the world are based on race (family) connection to that people (State)? Are we just going to ignore that the whole purpose of the war and creation of modern Israel was for the sole purpose of created a homeland for “Jews” and that this means that Palestinians (Arabs) therefore were displaced because of their “race” and ethnicity, as a bloodline not considered “Jewish” and therefore supposedly impure (not white, not pure-blooded, not uncorrupted)? Are we supposed to reconsider what it is to be “Mexican” or “English” or “Indian” because that is now a racist title, let alone not be allowed to consider that many diseases are exclusive to certain races (bloodlines)? Should all True cultures be vanquished to make room for… Ah, globalism. Now it’s starting to make sense. Global dystopia, Orwellian style. United Nations are really just united goy – one big melting pot of Godless heathens without any foundation of family values living without any natural moral compass.

What happens when, instead of being a natural (uncontrollable) occurrence and inevitably natural (God-given) order of species, the word race is used instead as a shallow excuse for illicit, bad behavior? What happens when moral men cannot defend what they have built, both physically and spiritually, to protect themselves from immoral men of either the same or a different race if they (we) are forced to tolerate everything that is intolerable and opposed to the continued survival and success of the fruit of their combined labors? What happens when one can no longer be effective in ones communication when even his words are considered as racist, sexist, or intolerable merely because they have a masculine, authoritative tone behind them? The answer to these questions is apparent in most nations today, not the least of which are the North American ones.

For the first time in history, the concept of race (bloodline and recorded familial genealogy) is being treated as an evil, as if racial differences both cultural and genetic simply don’t exist… except, that is, for the “royal” families This cultural neutering must be accompanied by national and now global tolerance, not only of cultural differences but specifically of absolutely opposing laws, until no moral (unwritten) law or notion of public decency is left. In other words, the only people left over, those that are not tolerated by this newly conditioned society of universal tolerance, are those that espouse any form of moral outrage, moral law, or other values that infringe upon the legal “human” rights of the most immoral of men. Our right to possess and exhibit a moral character in society will not be tolerated. Morality is racism. Family values are akin to xenophobia. Spirituality is a thought crime. Equality is artificially induced by legal law at birth, not by knowledge or actions. Solidarity in tolerance requires intolerance of all dissent, of all freedom of thought, and of all respect for difference. Tolerance is active ignorance of what should by all rights not be tolerated. And we are experiencing these facts in everything from music, art, and media to the corruption of medical, scientific, and intellectualist Babel that is killing and maiming us in droves every day.

Here’s Michael Moore, whose own American immigrant genealogy includes a forefather that was a white slave brought to America from a European prison, speaking in absolute lunacy about whatever he is pretending to perceive “the white guy” and “white men” to be. We are being indoctrinated by these societal-actors to hate ourselves, to become intolerable towards our own people, our own rich history, and to revision ourselves as oppressors instead of being equally oppressed as all other men, and regardless of the color of our skin. This is the ultimate example of profiteering off of race-baiting, a well-orchestrated deceit used by those in power to keep it in the family (bloodline). And perhaps most disturbing is the audience response!

—=—

The promotion of “racism” is nothing if not the induction of men into a culture of self-hatred. As a deleterious label placed on moral men defending their family honor and values, Zionist and other race-driven influencers, propagandists, and race-baiters have proven this fallacious term “racist” in whatever form it is implemented to be an invaluable and destructive weapon that, in the war of public opinion, wins by default every time. Why? Because ignorance is strength, and the public is swimming in a very large and controlled vat of induced, tolerated, active ignorance. If the messenger can be destroyed by such labels as antisemite or racist, then communism in whatever form it dresses up as wins every time. But isn’t that exactly what was portrayed by those screaming crowds of common heathens in Nineteen Eighty-four in their idolatrous worship of their glorious leader (false god)? Do you think worshiping Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump is not idolatry? Of course it is! And its exactly what is expected from we, the goyim.

How does one separate anciently engrained cultures from the races of men that have continuously practiced them, when the very conception of that culture has everything to do with race (bloodline)? The answer is that you can’t, for all cultures and systems of law and religion are unique to race, save that Law which is taught by Jesus Christ. But this law is not one of tolerance or acceptance, but one of privacy, of remaining foreign from men and cultures and nations that are exactly what we have all become, common pagans in idol worship of false gods and followers of other doctrines (i.e. man’s legal systems of law). These cultures cannot be mixed. They are by their nature unique and necessarily exclusive from all others. That which opposes a foundational culture and system of law cannot be integrated together and somehow remain uncorrupted or uninfluenced by the other. The very nature of any culture is assimilation of all others. In other words, one is expected to adapt and follow whatever culture and legal law system he or she emigrates into. But this is only true of the goyim, those that are enslaved by the false freedom (legal franchise) of citizenship to a some nation (corporation), that is, idolatry to a false (legal) god (ruler by blood inheritance). And by definition any and every culture, system of law, and religion is defined by its uniqueness, its intolerance of all others. Without these differences, this foundational, integrated opposition of all cultures to all others, there would be no reason for them to exist, just as there is no purpose for the existence of legal (manmade/written) law except to specifically stand against the moral, spiritual, unwritten Law of Nature (God) as expressed in the Bible and other scriptures (books of spiritual, moral law).

In other words, the goal of universal tolerance is to destroy all culture, all religion, all law, and all spirituality steeped in morality, so as to cause the inception of a singular, completely amoral, intolerable global society called as globalism… a new world (secularist) order. But again, because we have been made actively ignorant of this ancient Latin word secular (translated as the artificial, commercial world of men, not of God, not of Nature), we have no idea how to fight the implementation of this New World Order so often projected in science fiction dystopias like Orwell’s and Huxley’s. Because the Latin word seclorum in the phrase printed on every dollar bill is translated as “world” instead of its actual meaning of “secular,” most folks do not understand that this new world (secular) order is nothing more or less than a total destruction of all spiritual concepts, belief systems, and moral actions (self-government) by men. Because we have lost knowledge of the fact that the Bible is the foundation of common law in America and in the European countries (holders of the ultimate, true “racism” attributed to the genealogically derived royal families and their blood-lines of succession), there is no referential left to us that we may fight this global secularism with that which it is opposed to. Secularism is diametrically opposed to the Bible, or in other words, legalism (written law) is absolutely opposed to the moral, unwritten, Bible Law. In a totally secular order, no spirituality or moral thought or right will be tolerated. This secular toleration of all things anti-moral is the end game of this modern, universal tolerance we are all both passively and actively accepting, acting in, and pretending to love — loving that which we should hate, as the Bible warns we shall time and again in our participation and respect of “worldly” deprivation, leading to our ultimate self-destruction. We are tolerating our own demise. We are at this point tolerating an Orwellian nightmare without even a whimper, for to speak out against tolerance will not be tolerated by the intolerable promoters of universal, secularist tolerance.

You know what I have finally come to understand? It’s a real ballbuster. The truth is that almost every public attack, every so-called hate crime, every theft and every assault, every shooting, public education, blood-sport, assault and murder… these are all racist. Why? Because one generally does not attack and steal from one’s own family.

Acceptance of what is a known evil is surrender from what is self-evidently good.

Tolerance is intolerance.

War is peace because we peacefully tolerate war.

Freedom is slavery because we freely tolerate slavery.

Ignorance is strength because we strongly tolerate ignorance.

Through ignorance, slavery, and war (which are falsely called as knowledge, freedom, and peace) we will be destroyed through our own tolerance of intolerable things, our love of what we should hate, our acceptance of that which we should not accept, our value in that which holds no actual value, until that which we have so long tolerated destroys us through intolerance of good, moral men — just like any host allows a parasite to devour it because the parasite utterly controls the thoughts of the host. The only difference is that we are passively volunteering to be devoured.

One last thing… to those playing the “racist” game, using this term so openly and without reserve to describe all the ills that have befallen you, I want you to stop and consider something for a moment. Perhaps you are being treated exactly how you are treating other men? Perhaps you are experiencing the Law of Nature, that is, that you should expect to be treated as you treat others? Perhaps your problem is that you are just being an asshole and so are being treated like one? And perhaps somewhere along the way you’ve simply mistaken the response of people to your being an asshole with racism? Perhaps your demand for equality would be better taken if, instead of invoking how different you are based on your race by saying others are racist, you actually treated everyone with respect, the way you want to be treated?

Or maybe you’re right… Maybe it is racism that makes you an asshole in the first place.

Either way, isn’t it time to overcome what you now know to be a totally bullshit logical fallacy and start being what you want others to be toward you? Perhaps you can do something about all the bad in your life by invoking the good in yourself and the people around you that you blame for your own disposition? Because, I have to be honest here, every time I hear you claim that racism is the reason for your self-created problems, I can’t help but consider that the only racist in the room is he that claims to be a victim of it. Besides, if you are so proud of your race (family), which you should be, what possible thing can I say or do to change that genealogical bloodline connection? Answer: not a damn thing.

If you want to end what you perceive to be racism, then you will necessarily be required to start behaving in a way that doesn’t invoke culture or race. You will have to give up your cultural heritage and act exactly how those elitist bloodsuckers want you to act… like the rest of us white debt-slaves.

Moral of the story: stop being assholes to each other.

.

–Clint > richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Wednesday, August 14st, 2019