STRAWMAN: The Real Story Of Your Artificial Person

Apologies for my absence lately in the blogosphere, and for those comments I have not read and managed yet. I am also catching up on emails and wish to thank everyone who has made donations to keep me alive, researching, writing, and hosting the daily radio show (Mon-Fri, 7pm Eastern, on

That being said, I’d like to introduce my new website and that which has been taking most of my attention these days:

I’ve been writing this work in book-form for several years off and on, building it bit by bit, until this year when I made it my full-time project. As I have been researching and writing I am continuously learning while pouring over legal dictionaries, U.S. Code, international law, etymology sources, scripture, concordances, and other sources of ancient and hidden knowledge, from Plato to Bastiat. This fact has not and certainly will not change.

There is a point in which a researcher must bravely and with uncertain confidence finalize his writings into a utilizable form, though when this point is supposed to happen is beyond my own comprehension. For I wish not to be bound by my own misunderstandings and set-in-word errors in logic and rhetoric due to so much faulty grammar out there, as so many (most) authors certainly have. Perhaps this notion of perfection is as much an impossibility as the idea of attaining all knowledge is. Only time will tell…

Of this work I can only say one thing… that it has never been attempted before. It is being compiled so as to teach a new language, the legal language, to those who seek to comprehend that which enslaves them. The magic of words is the invisible web that entraps and enjoins us to a legal matrix of fictional things. But we are not shown or taught this authoritative, “higher” language in which true knowledge has been hidden. Instead, we are taught the common words of illiteracy. This is called public education. And it keeps us public, stealing all privacy.

One cannot simply pick up a Bible, for instance, and read it in the common tongue. It’s meaning will remain a mystery even while its Law remains highest. The common words are often quite opposite in meaning from their legal counterparts, though they appear to be the same. But the symptom of this disease causes the victims of this “vulgar” form of common communication to remain subject not only to man, but specifically to man’s creation of language terms of art. For the word common also means “goyim.”

The illusion is steadily shattered with every word uncovered, with every maxim revealed, with every Bible verse clarified, and with every lie demystified.

For the reader and as disclaimer, there will be no turning back. No more turning away from reality. No more living in ignorance. No more convenient lies. No more shirking of responsibility by blaming a fictional persona. And therefore no more legal excuses.

What is legal is not what is right.

This work will be offered in (non-commercial) book form in exchange for gifts in private donation and barter. I will be offering it in advance soon as well so that I can raise the funds to have it created (printed) in that “book” format. But it will always be offered for free as well, for no one should be without the knowledge of their own enslavement. A (.pdf) will be available to anyone unable or unwilling to offer trade or gift. The only difference between these two formats will be that the physical book-form will be indexed. At over 1,000 pages, this will be a reference book as much as anything.

Yes, 1,000+ pages… If there is one thing I have learned for certain in my many years of laboring for knowledge, it is that nothing worth learning or doing is easy. The path is narrow, and only a few will walk it. This work is designed to help light that path.

The website is temporary for now, and will be updated in the next few months as I begin to organize my tome of notes and research into a final collection. Again, thanks to those who have supported me with love and kindness, and the ability to continue this work.

If you’d like to hear what’s been happening in “The Corporation Nation” radio show, you can check out any of my 375+ shows from the last 20 months for free here:

(Note: Search tool at bottom of page, looks like a magnifying glass)

I hope to have the “book” finished in the next few months, and I’ll set up a unique email for that purpose. I will rely on merely word of mouth and radio promotion, so please help to spread the word and share freely. Just remember I can only continue this effort with your support.

Be well…


Clint Richardson (
Wednesday, June 3rd, 2015

Leave a comment


  1. Beat : G.

     /  June 3, 2015

    A big “Thank You Clint” from Switzerland !
    And we are looking forward to your book !

  2. Vicki

     /  June 4, 2015

    Thanks for sharing, I look forward to reading your book.

    I have come to think that this is part and parcel to why so many now use the word Dialog in lieu of conversation, as they are both forms of communicating, but one is purposely leading. The word Dialog is a combination of Dialectic and logos, or logic and word. If a listener or participant does not know or is not aware of the logic being used, let alone the words (language) used, they are being purposely deceived and misled. As they are speaking different Dialects, form of speech of a region or group, with different intended purposes.

  3. Check the Book in called Help Me To Live Right Written By Kenneth Moses Mitchell Jehovah’s witnesses in the flesh from heavenly places to share the Good News of the awakening of Jesus Christ and many others. We are Angeles sent by the creator of heaven and earth and everything within that lives… justice for all. I AM Jehovah and I have with me the awakening of Jesus Christ,, Adam, Archangel Michael and Gabriel,Eve,James,Andrew the brother of Jesus Christ, Glory of God, King David, and a Child Distanee shall lead them on their Journey. Amen in Jesus Christ Name I pray.

    • Arch Angel Gabriel

       /  June 4, 2015

      Amen, my Father…this is Adam/Arch Angel Gabriel here to share that our book, “Help Me To Live Right”by Kenneth Moses Mitchell/Jesus Jehovah is The Light of Truth and Deliverance for the Blind, Deaf and Dumb of our people…I’m a Witness that you are Tha King of Kings and Tha LORD of Lords and Now is Tha Time to Awaken to Tha Truth @

  4. I’ve read the book “Help me to live right” and it changed my whole perspective on life, now I have awakened to an angel James The Just, brother of Jesus. I recommend everyone to visit So they can purchase their copy of this eye opening product

  5. Eve Mother Of The Living

     /  June 4, 2015

    I am Eve Mother Of The Living through Jesus Jehovah and The Book Help Me To Live Right Awakened the Angel in me & There are many of us that are Awakened…Jesus…Arch Angel Michael…Arch Angel Gabriel..Adam…James (Jesus brother) Elijah & Andrew…Thomas…Glory…Peter…King David…Judas…Gideon…& a Child Destinee shall lead them In Jesus Name..Amen…

  6. paralaxview

     /  June 6, 2015

    Love your work bro, and your little tete- a- tete with marc stevens was the bomb, BUT I have to part company with you on the Bond/Birth Certificate issue. Like Peter Pan, I WANT TO BELIEVE, but I just can’t make the leap in logic that it would take. I am currently in the process of getting a copy of my Birth Certificate from the the Penna Health Dept, Vital Statistic’s office in Philadelphia as we speak. They give you a copy of it pretty much on the spot after a little song and dance they will hand you a copy. I have found NO paper trail, or anyone in ANY Asser’s office. county or state who EVEN heard of the issue.Can you provide the proof to back that up that little bit of Internet fiction ? “TRUST BUT VERIFY” !!!!!! John Cokos

    Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 18:24:52 +0000 To:

    • My whole book is based around it, many citations, etc. So if its a myth, its a good one to be able to fool me.

      So what is it that you don’t believe?

      And what exactly have you been able to acquire without it, in the form of drivers license, benefits, SS, ect.?

      FYI… I’ve invited Jan Irvin to host myself and Marc Stevens in an old fashioned trivium-based debate on Tuesday. So I’ll be posting that when it is finished. Should be a good one.



    • By the way… here is the U.S. Code:

      8 U.S. Code § 1401 – Nationals and citizens of United States at birth

      The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth:

      (a) a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof…

      (f) a person of unknown parentage found in the United States while under the age of five years, until shown, prior to his attaining the age of twenty-one years, not to have been born in the United States…



      In order to be found in the United States, a fictional person must be created (birth certificate). The state can only find an infant of unknown parentage, because the parents abandoned their child. Delivery means abandonment (see livery). A “Foundling” (see Black’s law) “found” in a “Foundling Hospital” is “found” in a district of the United States. District means seizure, distraint, distress. The person name/surname is a title given to a corporate entity (agency) of the United States. The informant (mother) signs the child away as a criminal act. And the child into adulthood uses that person (agency) to commercially operate in the Untied States jurisdiction, because he simply knows no other way. This is public persona. The goal is to become private.

      The book will be free, and everything will be defined and explained within. I won’t say trust me, because you are absolutely correct that you should only trust what you can verify. However, you should never trust yourself just because you haven’t done the painful due diligence and acquired the knowledge of a subject. I don’t believe is not a statement in harmony with the trivium method. Logic does not apply without first attaining proper grammar. Marc Stevens (a false stage name) makes the mistake (or does so on purpose) of placing logic as the main focus, but logic is impossible without good grammar and research. He can only make appeals to logic without proof of grammar to back them up. This is the same trick used of attorneys, bankers, priests, and politicians. This is the purposeful or innocent misuse of the classic trivium, and the reason for its power over people.


  7. Frederick

     /  June 7, 2015

    I often wonder if the perpetual “war”, which has been occurring since the creation of this country every 7 years, will ever be revealed that we the people have been in martial law and in slavery since 1861 and will the people CARE?

    • That is the subject of my next documentary, when I finally get to it. War is Peace. Peace is free-flowing commerce. War is necessary to free the blockage. Both are commercial activities.

      When in conversation and voting for their next president, a futile act to be sure, this should be the only topic of discussion – the war powers of the president must be cancelled, and only the president can do it, and only congress can make it permanent so that no president can ever again declare such power. How many men can be given such power only to relinquish it?


  8. Miah

     /  June 7, 2015

    Hey Clint,
    Glad you’re back. I can’t wait for the book. I’ll have plenty of time to read it, as I have ceased to claim that title any time approached by the sysyem, and now I live on the road. Bye bye corporate life! (I’ve done my best to settle all debts, within my means, have to walk away from some things, or it’d never happen…) Bike and trailer is all I need, for now. Possessions are so fleeting…The last of my FRNs are being used for food and “neccesities” to get me to the point of living without it anymore. It’s terrifying, but… No other options, no other way out… Time to suck it up, and GO!

    I have been through the system enough to realize that they are so criminal/insane at this point, it’s not going to matter to them if I send notice, or do, well, anything… I’ve made my opeace with it. I’ve given up addressing them, soon my BC, license, and all documents (now that I have them collected) will be a pile of ash. It may not be a reccomended method, but I just see it as my way to show the universe that its fire is the only way to cleanse ourselves, in truth.

    Thanks for all your help brother,


    P.S. I sent you a mail a while back, when I was in a bit worse off condition, sorry about that, I don’t think it was too terrible… I should be around your neck of the woods in the relative near future (think months, as it takes me a while to go distances) So please hit me up in an email if we could meet up and I’ll hopefully have something of value to offer you for a hard copy. I appreciate your great dedication to this research, and being a light along my path. Be well, and best of luck to you and yours.

    Raw version of a really great David Bazan song, “People”

  9. Thank you very much for all of your hard work!! I only wish I had a fraction of your intelligence because when presented with information that purports to “prove” that the United States is not a corporation, for example: I have no idea how to explain why it’s not true except to say his argument seems to be an agglomeration of bits and pieces which do not form cohesive and internally consistent proof of anything.

    Sadly, most people would rather read the link I posted above instead of devoting the time to read and/or watch/listen to your thoroughly researched information that absolutely proves the United States is a corporation. It’s so frustrating!

    Once again, thank you for all of your hard work and dedication!

    • Thanks… Indeed, my work (book) will certainly prove without a doubt the “corporation” thing. To suggest that government is a corporation like Walmart is a corporation is not correct of course. But, any body politic is certainly a corporation. I promise to clear that up in your head!

      Perhaps I’ll rebut this article.

      For instance, court opinions are taken out of the context as they were written for that specific case and not all cases, like here:

      “We may say in passing that the argument that the
      United States may be treated as a corporation
      organized under its own laws, that is, under the
      Constitution as the fundamental law, seems so strained
      as not to merit serious consideration.”

      It is not “a corporation organized under its own laws,” though it causes legal statute laws to be made. This is a true statement. That doesn’t make it any less a person (corporation/body politic) in law. It is not under the constitution, this is also correct. It was created by the States and their agents. Citizenships of the United States are not parties to the constitution. We are contracted with it in international admiralty law in interstate commerce. So it would be easy to take this statement and make it work for your argument if your reader doesn’t know better and define terms and have the background knowledge.

      The People who are private because they have reserved all their rights are parties to the constitution. Citizenships are public entities of the United States, like cars from a rental shop. Vessels. Ships on the commercial sea. We have no rights reserved and so the constitution does not apply to us. For instance, we bear the Arms of the United States (flag and seal), whereas the private People bear the arms of their forefathers, their blood in heraldry. Coat of Arms.

      As for the grave error of believing that the law created by the legislature is the final “letter of the law,” one has to be a fool to think these letters are the final word. The law means nothing until invoked, which means the first time it is used and utilized will be in front of a judge and his discretion on a specific case.

      Here are some quotes from the book that might help, remembering that they are agents of the sovereign People of the States through the Untied States corporation, and so are always protecting them against us, the public:


      “We are under a Constitution, but the Constitution is what the judges say it is, and the judiciary is the safeguard of our liberty and of our property under the Constitution.”

      —Charles Evans Hughes, 11th Chief Justice of the United States, 44th United States Secretary of State, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, and 36th Governor of New York


      “We have seen that the American Constitution has changed, is changing, and by the law of its existence must continue to change, in its substance and practical working even when its words remain the same.”

      —James Bryce, Chief Secretary for Ireland (U.K.), Ambassador to the United States of America (U.K.), President of the Board of Trade (U.K.), Under-Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs (U.K.), etc.

      “It is emphatically the province and duty of the Judicial Department to say what the law is. Those who apply the rule to particular cases, must of necessity expound and interpret that rule. If two laws conflict with each other, the courts must decide on the operation of each.”

      “It is emphatically the province and duty of the Judicial Department to say what the law is… If two laws conflict with each other, the Courts must decide on the operation of each.  So, if a law be in opposition to the Constitution… the Court must determine which of these conflicting rules governs the case. This is of the very essence of judicial duty.”

      —John Marshall, 4th Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, 4th United States Secretary of State, Member, U.S. House of Representatives from Virginia, 1st quote from: 1803 [John Marshall and John Edward Oster, ‘The Political and Economic Doctrines of John Marshall’ (New York: Neale Publishing Co., 1914), pg. 307.) 2nd quote from: Marbury v. Madison, 1803.


      “Presidents come and go, but the Supreme Court goes on forever.”

      —William Howard Taft, 27th U.S. president, 10th Chief Justice of the United States, 42nd United States Secretary of War, quoted from: c. 1910 [Richard Panchyk, ‘Our Supreme Court’ (Chicago Review Press, 2006), pg. 1.]


      “No higher duty, or more solemn responsibility rests upon this Court than that of translating into living law and maintaining this constitutional shield… for the benefit of every human being subject to our Constitution — of whatever race, creed, or persuasion.”

      —Hugo Black, Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court, U.S. Senator from Alabama, quoted from: 1940 [Bill Swainson, ed., Encarta Book of Quotations (Macmillan, 2000), pg.116.]


      “The words of the Constitution… are so unrestricted by their intrinsic meaning or by their history or by tradition or by prior decisions that they leave the individual Justice free, if indeed they do not compel him, to gather meaning not from reading the Constitution but from reading life.”

      —Felix Frankfurter, Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court, quoted from: 1949 [Alpheus Thomas Mason, The Supreme Court from Taft to Burger (LSU Press, 1979), pg. 14.]


      “The life of the law has not been logic, it has been experience.… The law embodies the story of a nation’s development through many centuries, and it cannot be dealt with as if it contained only the axioms and corollaries of a book of mathematics.”

      —Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court, Chief and Associate Justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, quoted from: 1880 [Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., The Common Law (1880; reprint published by The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd., 2004), pg. 1.]

      Hope that helps…


  10. Frederick

     /  June 8, 2015

    Your work that you have contributed to our understanding is beyond my comprehension. We have allowed the matters at hand to go beyond fixing. So, because we (the people) have to survive within this corrupt deceptive world, what would the remedy to the dilemma that we face.If there is a way to alleviate problems within our life there must be a solution of some sort to be able to deal with the fiat we use, the regulations we must abide to and the continued problems we face in our daily lives. Strawman or not both are in shackles beyond our understanding. Reading most of the articles you’ve written and the history I’ve tried to connect the dots is mind boggling. What I’ve run across several times are the “experts” that have the answers … of which no one has the know how in approaching the system of evil in any resolving way. Yes, it is imperative to know what is going on, but to avoid or resolve these issues in our life … I feel is the preemptive knowledge to overcome what we are placed in. The big question I present is, after we attain the knowledge, what is the next step? We can’t say “Oh I know what’s going on” and leave at that.

  11. trz

     /  June 9, 2015

    Thank you for your efforts and the great work you delivered so far! Looking forward to the book, it’s a topic that always intrigued me too, especially regarding the role of the roman church.

    I have one question, could you provide your blog archive in some easily downloadable form? I often link to your articles but it’s quite a pita to always run the search and go through a bunch of articles to find certain info bits, it would be very handy to have it locally as a PDF or such.

  12. Hilmar Sejr

     /  June 11, 2015

    Many thanks for your work all the way from Denmark, Mr. Richardson.
    I linked to your excellent Lethal Injection video in a discussion with some shill recently.
    They will never get to me.

  13. Debate? What debate? I just lost a good night’s sleep after stumbling across this verbal bloodbath you call a debate with Marc Stevens. Had this been an actual battle of fist-a-cuffs, the moderating ‘referee’ Jan would’ve had to intervene for mercy’s sake and spare the lad the expense of some very costly facial reconstruction surgery. I must say he seemed to ask for a pummeling with his reluctance to acknowledge the distinctions of several definitions under discussion. How dare him try to place his “logic” before ANY grammer; the nerve of this guy…lol.

    I do need to credit Marc however. I thought he displayed a certain false bravado and did an excellent job of not becoming completely unclued from the situation he suddenly found himself in when he first realised that he was in-over-his-head. That was about 3 minutes and 5 seconds after Jan had introduced the two of you as I recall. A pro like Evander Holyfield, even while leaving the ring with one less ear then what he entered the ring with, has had better days then Marc had after this no-contest.

    So again I say, debate; what debate? And who gives a damn about losing a good night’s sleep when so many proxy punches are being thrown for the truth and where the only real victims are the good folk who have yet to witness this titanic slugfest.

    And even though it was clearly a one-sided affair because one “fighter” came prepared while the other wasn’t, someone should have sold tickets to this “debate”; I sure as hell would have bought one.

    Well done lad, well done…

    • Well thanks for the comment, Hugh. It was an event to be sure. I really recommend that you go and read the comments that are on Marc’s site. There you will see a total onslaught of anti-Clint rhetoric. It’s hilarious. Not one pro-clint ticket in the whole lot! LOL. This is why I continuously say that gurus are dangerous, and that I am not a guru nor do I want to be associated with them.

      Here’s the website:

      I remember a time when this would emotionally and illogically upset me. Now I see nothing but the universal deceit that Orwell predicated. I am saddened by so many being mislead. And I will continue to expose it at my own expense and duty.

      Thanks again,


      • FYI
        A lusty, gusty attack on “The Law” as a curious, antiquated institution which, through outworn procedures, technical jargon and queer mummery, enables a group of medicine-men to dominate our social and political lives and our business, to their own gain.

        “When I was mulling over the notion of writing this book, I outlined my ideas about the book, and about the law, to a lawyer who is not only able but also extraordinarily frank and perceptive about his profession. “Sure,” he said, “but why give the show away?” That clinched it.”

        by FRED RODELL Professor of Law, Yale University Written in 1939

        “Woe unto you, lawyers! For ye have taken away
        the key of knowledge: ye entered not in yourselves,
        and them that were entering in ye hindered.” — Luke. XI, 52

        • Ethan K.

           /  June 17, 2015

          Wow, thank you Hugh. First I’ve seen of this book. Cheers!

  14. Marjorie Darling

     /  June 15, 2015

    Clint, I am sooo glad you are doing this!  I’m letting everybody I know know. Marj Darling

  15. Sidney Smith

     /  June 19, 2015

    you have to understand we are all under commrcial law we knowly and unknowing with free will and consent with a state created Government Document birth certicate Inc. as surity mom and dad signed away all are rights from God. In contract law Government Inc is the holder only you are the owner of that document. The birth certicate the State created a Social Security Number corporate entity for you a slave number. The Social Security Card as 2 number on it the fiction you number on the front and the red number on the back of the card that you own is for the living being you created by the United States Treasury department, therfore , you are the pricipale, owner of that Red Number account that has a lot of money in it. The birth certicate was sold the SEC for a lot money $53,000,000.00 dollars and all other civil fines. There are no crimines in United States civil only and also you ae insured for $10,000,000.0 dollars required by the sec. so as the red munber account has a lot of money in it. That means all government fines, (this is why their is lot of people in jail today), are pre-paid by that red number. a place to start is with the U.C.C. 1 form signed by the Secretary of State, Bid bond, paymet bond, performance bond

  16. andri

     /  July 20, 2015

    Hello Clint,

    Good to see you back…..I was wondering, went to your new site to see if I could download the pdf version of your newest wrting “STRAWMAN: The Real Story Of Your Artificial Person”, only it appears your new site is still under construction and not officially ready yet. Could you give a time (if possible) of when this will be completed? Or a link where I can get the pdf…..I really enjoy your work, thought provoking, makes sense in so many ways, how the govt has deceived the people all these many years and decades…..that our society is truly based on a commercial platform, which is why they (the govt) wants you to obtain a license, because they think we/you are conducting business, which we aren’t, just every day life without interference from govt…keep up the great work bro…


  17. Any word on the books schedule in print? I’m looking forward to a barter for physical copies. Sorry to hear recently that your show ended. I’ve only recently begun to diligently listen through your whole archive of CNR. I’m about a quarter the way through it, and I have to say I can’t believe I wasted so many years following gurus and controlled opposition alt media persons. Pretty much you and Jan Irvin agree some of the few people I actually trust to do good research. Keep up the great work man!

  1. Bonus Content – Clint on Deanna Spingola’s Show – June 11, 2015 | Corporation Nation Radio Archives!!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: