All posts tagged what in the world are they spraying

Archons And Mind Parasites And Extremophiles, Oh My!

Correction: Please note that I made an assumption I should not have without researching, one I will leave in the article as an example of how bad research and writing can sound so pleasing. While the connecting information about Margaret Sanger is certainly sound, the “Sanger Institute” I fallaciously assumed without verifying is actually not named after Margaret Sanger, but a scientist by the same name. “It was established in 1992 and named after double Nobel Laureate, Frederick Sanger.” My apologies for this mistake. All other research is vetted and verified accept this namesake connection. Genetics is proving every day to be just modern eugenics. This is a great and humbling lesson to me, as it should be a warning for you not to repeat. Always correct any mistakes if you are able. And make no assumptions in your research! –Clint

–=–

This is a video blog. Thanks to John Lothe who recorded this research and posted it on Youtube.

Part 1 –

Part 2 –

–=–

I seem as of late to be using the phrase “in their right mind” a lot.

For instance, I often say that nobody in their right mind should be melancholy to what is happening in the world. No one in their right mind should be ok with the fact that the U.S. government in its U.S. Code has an active biological weapons program that makes it “legal” and “acceptable” to test those biologics, radiation, vaccines, and any other thing for “research purposes” on any and every population in the world, including and especially its own. And no body politic of “people” in its right mind would sit back and allow what the United States government has become in all aspects of politics and war.

Yet the deeds are done, and the crime against us is only getting more and more organized and lethal.

And this leads me to believe that my over-use of this declaratory judgement in assumption of the default belief in the state of right-mindedness might very well be misplaced. And so perhaps it is time to consider the very strange and unbelievable reality that maybe, just maybe, the majority of the population is not in fact in their right minds. And if this is the case, well then it might just be possible that they no longer even have the ability to control their own minds…

More and more I contemplate that those who might read this blog and others like it are in fact seeking answers to questions that cannot be found with an “educated” and “entertained” mind. It is not so much that there is no answer to be found, but rather that the answers that can be found do not conform to the reasoning and intent of the asker of the questions. In other words, the questions that seem unanswerable only appear that way because their askers will not look in the places where those answers might so obviously be hiding.

The difference between history (his story) and fiction, and between science and science fiction, has been so divisively blurred and so masterfully intertwined that most of us have been educated through entertainment to ignore anything resembling reality if it has been before musingly portrayed as a story of science or other fiction. Ironically, while the science fiction of yesterday could be considered the uninhibited dream of what the future could hold, today it seems that fiction is dead, and that the rules and science of fiction have been devolved and redacted, fitting only into the defined tenets of today’s real scientific limitations. Today, fiction writers are not dreaming of future possibilities and dystopias, they are describing the planned future of a dystopian science reality. The limits now placed on the imagination of the writer of fiction seem to be solely based on the current but flexible limitations of the practice of modern science. And so the once vibrant dream of utopian philosophers has seemingly also come to its visionary death, for today’s practitioners within the institution of science have taken up not the study of nature but the art of the alteration and control of nature. Anti-nature…

And so those of us who still feel; we who still conform to and therefore know the natural aspects of empathy, logic, reason, virtue, responsibility, and all that makes up the uniqueness and wonder of man are left hopelessly wondering why everything in the world seems somehow, for lack of a better term, just innately wrong. We search for individual answers that, when thoughtfully placed in connective order, we hope might make up the clear summation of the problem at hand. And yet no matter what, the ultimate answer still seems to lay out of sensual understanding. From our sense of reality, we seek a type of knowledge that very likely cannot be obtained through the ordinary processes and facts that otherwise we may find using the traditional scientific method. For that method was created to specifically study the natural state and order of things. So we must ask ourselves some very disturbing questions:

How can we possibly use this traditional scientific method to find answers when all of nature is being corrupted by the abuse of modern scientific methods?

If science is the study of nature and how it works without the intervention of man, and if at the same time nature itself is being fundamentally altered by the false institution of science, what then should the new definition of modern science be?

More to the point, how can a reasonable researcher use traditional scientific means in logical sequence to accomplish the goals of this new non-traditional science?

What was before the study of the laws of nature is now the study of the destruction of those constants. What was before the craft of benefiting mankind through understanding the natural process is now the craft of overcoming that process to control mankind through control of nature.

So for those who seek provable answers using the traditional scientific method, it is advised that you should go back to watching re-runs of “History Channel Presents.” For today, we are going to delve into what is indeed possible yet seemingly not. And as of yet, there is no proof or test that I can offer you to satisfy your “scientific” curiosity. Instead, for a brief moment, I ask you to consider that what might be the answer to your unanswered questions may very well be so different than you expect that you won’t even wish to bring up the subject to friends and family for fear of ridicule. And honestly, the only reason I am writing this now, with the same contemplation and fear in mind, is that I have a strange feeling that only those of us left out here that are still in our right mind will believe that the following information is perhaps more self-evident than any other explanation.

The great rhetorical mind of the Scottish author and physician Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, a graduate of the University of Edinburgh Medical School no less, might be of import in this endeavor. His character Sherlock Holmes was essentially represented as the crowning authority in the use of forensic science. The word forensic comes from the Latin forēnsis, meaning “of or before the forum (court),” dating to the roman republic. Created in the late 1890’s, detective Holmes was required to use his brain, his logic and his reason to solve the case, for the modern technology of crime scene investigation was not yet in existence, and this allowed many criminals to flee justice.

Today, I ask the same of you, my dear Watson’s…

In the novels based on Sherlock Holmes; those fictional tales about the unorthodox, de-educated, non-conformative detective, it was said of man that, “His ignorance was as remarkable as his knowledge.”

Even more remarkably, the fictional detective stated that, “In solving a problem of this sort, the grand thing is to be able to reason backward. That is a very useful accomplishment, and a very easy one, but people do not practise it much. In the everyday affairs of life it is more useful to reason forward, and so the other comes to be neglected. There are fifty who can reason synthetically for one who can reason analytically.” It is my opinion that if you are reading this blog, you may very well be one in fifty.

Of course, his most famous musing concluded that, “When you have eliminated all which is impossible, then whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.”

But perhaps in light of our current disposition as sentient beings searching for answers to questions that seemingly won’t be answered, it is this quote we should be romancing: “I fear that if the matter is beyond humanity it is certainly beyond me. Yet we must exhaust all natural explanations before we fall back upon such a theory as this.”

In the spirit of this Holmesian deductive reasoning, I hope that the reader will allow herein a presentation of my own theory on why everything in science and in the actions of the leaders of men seem to be centralized on creating a fictional dystopia of mis-used science rather than on the use of science to realize the dream of fictional utopia.

(Que ‘Twilight Zone’ music)

–=–
Warning:
This Is Not Science Fiction!
–=–

In movies, the monster is usually something that you can see. The alien from Alien. The clown from IT. The Martians from Mars Attacks. The Englishmen from Downton Abbey. And who can forget Mega Shark vs. Crocosaurus?

The use of the genre of sci-fi horror movies depicting gruesome monsters and viscously putrefying aliens has created a false dicotomy of left or right opinions regarding what the typical person might be able to believe is possible within the institutional reality of biological science, which today has seemingly crossed the barrier of perception with its primary basis now in the world of the unseen – the less-than-microscopic nano-world of genetic code. “Science” has mapped the genomes of many species, and is now hot on the trail of mapping the epigenetic on/off mechanisms of DNA/RNA encoding that controls gene expression and disease. It is one thing to see how genes are put together to make up life on earth, but an entirely more dangerous thing to have one’s hands on the knowledge and function of turning those gene’s expressions on and off. In this manner, science has become a very frightening brave new world.

The Genome project is now a thing of the past, old news, ancient technology. The Epigenome Project is now where it’s at!

The Human Epigenome Project website explains its surface goals:

The Human Epigenome Project (HEP) aims to identify, catalogue and interpret genome-wide DNA methylation patterns of all human genes in all major tissues. Methylation is the only flexible genomic parameter that can change genome function under exogenous influence. Hence it constitutes the main and so far missing link between genetics, disease and the environment that is widely thought to play a decisive role in the aetiology of virtually all human pathologies. Methylation occurs naturally on cytosine bases at CpG sequences and is involved in controlling the correct expression of genes. Differentially methylated cytosines give rise to distinct patterns specific for tissue type and disease state. Such methylation variable positions (MVPs) are common epigenetic markers. Like single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), they promise to significantly advance our ability to understand and diagnose human disease.

The Human Epigenome Project (HEP) is a public/private collaboration run by the members of the Human Epigenome Consortium. MVPs identified as part of the HEP will be released publicly in accordance with the HEP data release policy.

Source–> http://www.epigenome.org/index.php?page=project

–=–

And just who or what makes up the members of this “consortium?”

Current consortium members:

The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute is a recognised leader in genome sequencing, high-throughput systems, informatics and analysis of gene function using genetic approaches in a variety of model organisms and humans.

Epigenomics AG is a transatlantic biotechnology company with headquarters in Berlin, Germany and its wholly owned subsidiary in Seattle, Washington, USA, pioneering tomorrow’s personalized medicine by exploiting the information of DNA methylation patterns.

The Centre National de Génotypage is a national research institute set up in 1998 by the French Government in anticipation of using the genome sequencing information for the identification of genes and gene function.

Source–> http://www.epigenome.org/index.php?page=consortium

–=–

Now, if you are not familiar with Margaret Sanger, you really should be. As one of the most famous soft eugenisists, her legacy includes Planned Parenthood and modern birth control. But let’s take a deeper look at this feminist de-populationist, and imagine for a moment if she had her finger on the trigger of modern genetic and epigenetic technology. Planned Parenthood would look a lot differently than it does today.

Surprisingly, even Wikipedia must admit to the truth of the easily found history of her motives (citations and sources left in):

Sanger’s 1920 book endorsed eugenics.

As part of her efforts to promote birth control, Sanger found common cause with proponents of eugenics, believing that they both sought to “assist the race toward the elimination of the unfit.”[84] Sanger was a proponent of negative eugenics, which aims to improve human hereditary traits through social intervention by reducing the reproduction of those who were considered unfit.[85] Sanger’s eugenic policies included an exclusionary immigration policy, free access to birth control methods and full family planning autonomy for the able-minded, and compulsory segregation or sterilization for the profoundly retarded.[86][87] In her book The Pivot of Civilization, she advocated coercion to prevent the “undeniably feeble-minded” from procreating.[88] Although Sanger supported negative eugenics, she asserted that eugenics alone was not sufficient, and that birth control was essential to achieve her goals.[89][90][91]

In contrast with eugenicist William Robinson, who advocated euthanasia for the unfit,[note 9] Sanger wrote, “we [do not] believe that the community could or should send to the lethal chamber the defective progeny resulting from irresponsible and unintelligent breeding.”[92] Similarly, Sanger denounced the aggressive and lethal Nazi eugenics program.[87] In addition, Sanger believed the responsibility for birth control should remain in the hands of able-minded individual parents rather than the state, and that self-determining motherhood was the only unshakable foundation for racial betterment.[89][93]

Sanger also supported restrictive immigration policies. In “A Plan for Peace”, a 1932 essay, she proposed a congressional department to address population problems. She also recommended that immigration exclude those “whose condition is known to be detrimental to the stamina of the race,” and that sterilization and segregation be applied to those with incurable, hereditary disabilities…[86][87][94]

Sanger’s writings echoed ideas about inferiority and loose morals of particular races that were widespread in the contemporary United States.[85] In one “What Every Girl Should Know” commentary, she references popular opinion that Aboriginal Australians were “just a step higher than the chimpanzee” with “little sexual control,” as compared to the “normal man and Woman.”[78] Elsewhere she bemoaned that traditional sexual ethics“…have in the past revealed their woeful inability to prevent the sexual and racial chaos into which the world has today drifted…”[93]

From 1939 to 1942 Sanger was an honorary delegate of the Birth Control Federation of America, which included a supervisory role—alongside Mary Lasker and Clarence Gamble—in the Negro Project, an effort to deliver birth control to poor black people.[100] Sanger wanted the Negro Project to include black ministers in leadership roles, but other supervisors did not. To emphasize the benefits of involving black community leaders, she wrote to Gamble “we do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.” This quote has been cited by Angela Davis to support her claims that Sanger wanted to exterminate black people.[101] However, New York University’s Margaret Sanger Papers Project, argues that in writing that letter, “Sanger recognized that elements within the black community might mistakenly associate the Negro Project with racist sterilization campaigns in the Jim Crow South, unless clergy and other community leaders spread the word that the Project had a humanitarian aim.”[102]

One might perhaps laugh at the caption of this article,
promoting birth control while posing with her own two birthed sons.
Of course, birth control was really intended for the “lesser” races…

–=–

Ironically, but not surprisingly, Sanger’s racially pure mother Anne Higgins went through 18 pregnancies (with 11 live births) in 22 years before dying at the age of 49. Sanger was the sixth of eleven children. But then, she was apparently gifted with good blood from a good race, so that’s just alright now isn’t it?

So why should you, if indeed you are in your right mind, be concerned that the most prominent organization participating in the Genome and Epigenome Projects honor in their titles this eugenicist that promoted racial purity and depopulation? Are you frickin’ kidding me? Do you think plants, fruits, and vegetables are the only life that can be purposefully, scientifically, and genetically altered from their natural form?

Let’s get more acquainted with the institute celebrating her legacy, shall we?

Embracing a postgenomic era

The Sanger Institute will examine how genomes are implicated in the biology of disease in greater detail, with greater precision and at faster rate than previously thought possible. Genomes are rapidly becoming a part of the essential fabric of biology, rather than an expensive resource.

Our target is to understand the function of genes on a genome-wide scale. The intellectual commitment and drive of our researchers, combined with developments in technology, will allow us to make a contribution to the understanding of how genes work that is as significant as our contribution to the Human Genome Project.

This contribution will be founded in efforts to tackle the basis of common genetic and infectious disease and to build resources and tools that will help others to tackle disease. Our dual role, as researcher and resource provider, has served biology well and we believe it will become more valuable in the future.

In the next two years, we will sequence more than 1000 human genomes. By 2012, we will make stem cells in more than 10,000 genes.

Human genetics

Our research in Human Genetics will harness the power of our improving sequencing and genotyping infrastructure in order to gain a better understanding of the diversity of the human species and how this diversity influences our health and disease. By 2011, the Institute will have sequenced more than 1000 human genomes. As part of the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium and other similar large-scale consortia, we will continue to discover important genetic variants on the scale that is required to give insight into the genetics of common disease.

By 2013, the International Cancer Genome Consortium will have produced comprehensive catalogues of mutations in more than 50 different tumour types. This work, in which we play a leading role, will lay the foundation for clinical research to produce treatments that could help to reduce the global cancer burden.

Building on new technologies, we will help to develop a rapidly growing understanding of diseases including cancer, heart disease and diabetes. Our research outputs and resources, such as the DECIPHER database, will move into clinical practice as our biological understanding becomes clinically essential.

Infectious disease

Our capacity to analyse genomes means that we can examine the diversity of pathogens, both within and between species, on a scale unmatched within Europe. Our future research will lead to new understanding of infectious disease and its development and spread: using new technologies we can map individual organisms and the development of disease in an individual or among a population with exquisite accuracy. Embracing these technologies, our researchers will complete a staggering 10,000 pathogen sequences by 2011.

We will move rapidly to examining the interactions between pathogen and host – a vital meeting point that influences the genetics of both organisms. Our research in malaria will strengthen understanding of genetics of host-pathogen interactions. Our programmes will help to build capacity among researchers in the UK and in front-line countries facing the challenge of infectious disease. Our research into malaria shares the Global Malaria Action Plan’s morbidity reduction targets for 2010 and 2015.

Our research in pathogens will also build on the MRSA and C. difficile sequences in order to help health authorities make rational and considered plans for dealing with healthcare-associated infections.

Model organisms

Working with our collaborators, we will deliver, over the next few years, resources that will transform research using model organisms.

–=–

Mice are used as a model organism.

Cloning of genetically created mice justifies total abuse of life, for the
life is created by man and therefore owned by man. How long before
humans are treated merely as model organisms used as resources?

Oops! Too late…

–=–

These remarkable resources notwithstanding, it is our research programmes that hold increasing promise.

Our research in the mouse will give a biological understanding of the genes implicated in cancer found through other programmes, such as the International Cancer Genome Consortium. Using mouse models, we will identify and unlock the networks of genes that drive cancer.

We will develop systems to accelerate stem cell research by allowing better manipulation of cell lines and by enhancing the production of embryonic stem (ES) cells.

The resources will support new research in developmental biology, hearing and cognition.

Source–> http://www.sanger.ac.uk/about/what/future.html

–=–

You might say that mice are the gateway drug to human resource cloning as model organisms. For if we don’t protect that which cannot protect itself, then perhaps we deserve a similar fate.

To view this disturbing mouse resource collection, go here:

Community

The Institute is a leading contributor to the European Conditional Mouse Mutagenesis Program (EUCOMM), the NIH-funded Knockout mouse programmes of KOMP and KOMP2, the International Knockout Mouse Consortium (IKMC), and the International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium (IMPC).

We have generated BACs for various mouse strains that are displayed on the Mouse Resources Portal and Ensembl and are available from Source BioScienceLifeSciences and the BACPAC Resources Center. Mouse ES cells are available from MMRC UC Davis.

Data generated at the Sanger Institute is available from our from the Mouse Genomes Project.

Source–> http://www.sanger.ac.uk/resources/mouse/

–=–

Now, those in their right mind should be very concerned with the potential of this type of power. This is like children getting ahold of God’s constructor set and becoming little creators of hell on Earth. This is not just power, but the absolute power of negative creation, undoing the natural mathematical order of the DNA of all things.

But then, no body seems to be in their right mind when considering this. For man is patenting his creation as he goes, using word magic to be the master of life itself…

(CNN) — Here’s a little-known fact: Under current law, it’s possible to hold a patent on a piece of human DNA, otherwise known as a gene.

Some breast cancers… are linked with the genes BRCA1 and BRCA2.

Companies that have acquired patents for genes have specific rights to their use, which may include diagnostic tests based on those genes, as well as future mutations that are discovered.

In a new lawsuit, the American Civil Liberties Union alleges that the policy is unconstitutional.

The targets of the lawsuit, Myriad Genetics and the University of Utah Research Foundation, hold patents to BRCA1 and BRCA2, the genes responsible for many cases of hereditary breast and ovarian cancers.

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is also named in the suit.

The lawsuit asserts that the patents prevent some people from accessing medical screening for BRCA1 and BRCA2. It also challenges the general patentability of genes, which has been legal since 1980. That year, in Diamond v. Chakrabarty, the Supreme Court found in favor of Ananda Mohan Chakrabarty, who used bacteria to engineer a microbe that dissolves oil. Watch Dr. Gupta explain the lawsuit »

Genes form the basic unit of heredity. With modern technology, researchers have determined that particular genes carry an associated risk of illness.

A striking 20 percent of all human genes have been patented. However, now that all 20,000 to 25,000 human genes have been mapped and sequenced through the Human Genome Project, they are in the public domain, meaning they would no longer be considered “new” for the purposes of patents, said Lee Silver, professor of molecular biology and public policy at Princeton University. Now, patents on human genes must specify a new use, such as a diagnostic test.

If a company wants to patent the purified form of an antibiotic that exists in nature in a fungus, no one challenges that, Silver said. Plant DNA, as well as human DNA, can be synthesized in a laboratory. Distinguishing this case from a patented human gene that is useful in diagnostics would require the ethical argument that the human genome is sacred — and even then, things get murky, considering that about 25 percent of human genes are shared by chimpanzees, he said.

“THE PATENT LAW SAYS NOTHING ABOUT ETHICS,” he said…

Source–> http://www.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/05/13/genes.patent.myriad/index.html?_s=PM:HEALTH

–=–

Again, it is said that power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.

So, in reference to this notion of power, what would you consider on a scale of 1-10 the power-base of knowledge in being able to control the entire expression of the human genome within the entire population of Earth – real or synthetic? Would you say that it is a 10 on that scale perhaps if one could wipe out the expression for empathy and religious capacity? How about the expression for logical thinking and reason… would that be a corruption of power? And what about love…?

What about synthetic people, or clones? Who needs the real thing when you can hand deliver the perfect, docile, subservient beast of a patented human?

From its website, the Sanger Institute explains it’s purpose:

What we do

Our research at the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute builds understanding of gene function in health and disease as well as creating resources of lasting value to biomedical research.

We study diseases that have an impact on health globally by investigating genomes. Building on our past achievements and based on priorities that exploit the unique expertise of our Faculty of researchers, we will lead global efforts to understand the biology of genomes. We are convinced of the importance of making this research available and accessible for all audiences…

Our research into genetics and disease

Our genomic information has a significant impact on our health. Global health problems including cancer, malaria, diabetes, obesity and infectious disease are partially determined genetically. At the Sanger Institute we are uniquely placed to build on genome sequences and to engage in biomedical research that elucidates the genetic basis of such common diseases as well as rare or neglected diseases.

Why we study genomes

Genomes are the archival instructions upon which an organism is built. The sequence data provided by the Human Genome Project is a rich source of information that drives improved understanding of human health and variation. Studying human sequences, comparing model organism genomes and investigating the effects of pathogens on humans will build knowledge of the diversity of our genomes and how this affects our susceptibility to disease…

Source–> http://www.sanger.ac.uk/about/what/

–=–

From its annual review, we read:

Genomes continue to revolutionise the study of biology. Their contribution to medicine is just kicking off.

In 2011 our sequencing pipeline delivered 200,000,000,000,000 (200 trillion) bases of DNA – more than all the previous years of the Institute combined.

Coupled with the output from our genotyping pipeline, which is using the latest DNA chip technology, our researchers are able to interrogate genomes at a scale and resolution that is many orders of magnitude greater than before. This rich vein of information is enabling our researchers to discover and interpret at ever greater depth the significance of genomic variation within and between species.

Drawing on our vast genomic resources enables us to play a leading role in national and international collaborations. The techniques, databases and software we develop allow us to make vital contributions to research into the spread of infectious disease, the development of cancer, and the epidemiology of malaria, sickle cell disease and metabolic risk factors in Africa.

Our ability to answer new questions is turning received genomic understanding on its head. For example, when the Cancer Genome Project team investigated structural DNA rearrangements in the chromosomes in cancer, they uncovered an entirely new mechanism for cancer development. The team discovered that some people’s cancer genomes bore the scars of a catastrophic event that had driven them a number of steps towards cancer in a single cell cycle. The chromosomes had exploded and incorrect pasting together of the DNA had produced many cancer-driving mutations.

Another convention-busting discovery was made when our researchers sought to complete the genomic picture of the spectrum of Leishmania parasites. Seeking to understand the genomic variations responsible for the differing severity of symptoms caused by the different strains, the team made a surprising discovery. Producing high-quality reference genome sequences showed that the different strains had almost identical genetic codes, but that the strains’ genomes contained different numbers of copies of the chromosomes. This finding suggests that the parasite’s evolutionary development and success is founded on the numbers of particular genes and chromosomes it has – a genetic abnormality that would kill most organisms.

Our Pathogens teams are harnessing our high-throughput sequencing and analysis resources to compare variation between individual bacterial and viral genomes from patients to track and trace precisely the spread of disease. By comparing cholera genomes during the current global pandemic, our researchers have been able to categorically trace its origin back to the Bay of Bengal. Using the same technique, we have mapped the spread of the H1N1 flu virus across the UK during the most recent epidemic and have shown that the disease entered at a number of geographic locations at different times, before the first clinical case was identified.

Our ability to conduct genomic research at high resolution and vast scope enables us to provide the foundations for the global research community to build upon. For example, the fruits of our investment in the 1000 Genomes Project are being harvested by researchers across the globe as they use the data to enhance the resolution of the genome-wide association studies and understand the origins of genetic mutation…

Source–> http://www.sanger.ac.uk/about/how/assets/2011wtsi_annual_review_full.pdf

–=–

Open source genetic codes for genomes?

Instructional genomic blueprints for cancer offered to the world?

Offering the entire mechanism for the spread of disease on the cellular level to the militaries (governments) of the world?

Sharing the origins of genetic mutation with anyone interested?

20 trillion base DNA sets deconstructed in a single year?

Perhaps my concern is not being completely burned into the readers conscious here, and perhaps that’s because the reader may not be reading this from the point of view of a racially driven, psychopathic purist de-populationist! Get it? The “Sanger” institute? In honor of dear old Margaret? This should make even the roots of your own DNA shake violently with fear and loathing. Satan, if you believe in that sort of thing, could not ask for a better tool as the defined “adversary of man,” with this toolset being the epitome of the model chemistry set to de-construct nature and reform it in man’s own image. This new world order of DNA and genomic expression belongs in no mans hands, for no man is immune from the ultimate disease of unrestrained power. There are no true ethics in the modern notion of what is “science,” because the institution of science today specifically disregards nature’s (God’s) design in order to exploit and alter the intent of that self-evident design. It studies nature only in order to change or destroy it. The diseases it is claiming to be able to treat and cure on the genetic level were of course caused by this very same institution of medical and scientific crimes against man and nature in the first place, and so the placing of our faith in such institutions to cure us from its own self-inflicted ills is fool-hearted at best. Cancer was all but non-existant before modern practices of those who profess to be professors, professionals, scientists, and doctors spread it experimentally as vaccine ingredients, rearing its ugly head according to some in history only after modern vaccination was introduced.

And that brings me to my point. We have all been stung by this beast of medical science. Vaccination is designed to apparently replace what nature has already installed within the expressions of the body as the natural immune response to outside influences. One has no allergy to bee stings, for instance, unless one is stung by the bee, which delivers its disease-causing agents through a stinging injection. Spiders penetrate by a stinging bite, as do dogs with rabies. Tetanus and hepatitis thrive many places, but can only enter the body through a stinging penetration of the skin (or through the penetration of intercourse, i.e. the exchange of bodily fluids). The vaccination needle is the simulated, weaponized sexual appendage of the science of modern medicine. We are violated by it, raped by it; we are injected (stung) with substances and DNA that would never otherwise have the capacity to enter our bodies and mix with our substance. We are literally being grafted like fruit trees with the foundational building blocks of the gene expression and DNA of other life forms, including that of our fellow man as with the injection of cloned human diploid cells (including DNA and proteins) from various aborted fetal tissues, human albumin (from blood), rhesus monkey fetal lung cells, continuous (cloned) line of monkey kidney cells, rhesus monkey fetal diploid cells, simian cancer virus-40 (and at least 79 others), vesicle fluid from calf skins, calf serum, bovine serum, bovine fetal serum, U.S. sourced bovine extract, washed sheep red blood cells (RBC’s), chick embryo, chick embryonic fluid, chicken protein, mouse serum proteins, guinea pig embryo cells, shark squalene, gelatin, hydrolized gelatin, processed gelatin, lactose, and others. These are just a few of the ingredients that you have been infected with by stingers called needles.

Vaccination is, in its most simple description, the purposeful infection of the body with foreign particles and substances. Whether those substances are good or bad, beneficial or harmful, therapeutic or deadly does not remove the fact that vaccination is nothing more than purposeful infection with disease. This is not contagion, for a vaccinated person is not necessarily contagious, though some “shedding” of the vaccine does take place after infection (vaccination). The injection of peanut oils and lactose as ingredients in vaccines, for instance, is certainly linked to localized milk and peanut allergies that are not spreadable as contagious infection to others, but are rather local reactions to otherwise harmless foods, if only they were eaten instead of injected past any natural barriers. Thus, we must think outside of the box we are placed into by media education and realize that infection is a neutral word that actually also represents any forcing of so-called “medicine” into the body.

But consider how the body then might react to monkey kidney tissue or cow blood being injected into it, bypassing the natural protective barriers for such agents through the deep, penetrating sting of the inoculation needle. It is well known that even the Rh factor of some human blood types prevents negative and positive bloods from mixing to create life. The mother’s body will literally attack the newly formed embryo of a different blood type (Rh) to kill it as a foreign infection. So imagine how incompatible your body and its blood and fluid is to cow, monkey, pig, sheep, insect, and other animal blood and protein products used in vaccines, which have no other way to enter and infect your body but through the penetrating sting of vaccination.

But let’s not stop there. For other ingredients within vaccines also have no hope of forcibly entering past your body’s defenses without the sting of a nurse or pharmacy technician with a couple of weeks of government sponsered training and indoctrination mixed with a healthy dose of cognitive dissonance. The arrogant advocate for vaccination is always one who’s livelihood depends on delivering it, no differently than those animals and insects that sting or bite in protection of their own livelihood… or to spread parasites. And the propaganda machine of fallacy and quack science fills the heads of those who subject themselves and their own children to such violations of the natural law as vaccines are.

Let’s not forget the heavy metals and other extra ingredients also used in vaccines with thinly veiled reasonings and names such as preservatives and adjuvents. Those include such other foreign particles and poisons (medicines) as formaldehyde, aluminum hydroxide, aluminum phosphate, thimerosal (mercury-based), polysorbate 80 (Tween-80), ammonium sulfate, formalin, sucrose, sorbitol, benzethonium chloride, glycerin, phenol (a compound obtained by distillation of coal tar), beta-propiolactone, 2-phenoxyethanol, polysorbate 20, yeast, chemically defined yeast-based medium, soy protein, phenol red indicator, phosphate buffered saline, monosodium L-glutamate (MSG), potassium glutamate, potassium chloride, potassium phosphate monobasic, potassium phosphate dibasic, potassium monophosphate, potassium diphosphate, sodium bicarbonate, sodium phosphate dibasic, polydimethylsiloxane (silicone), and even the known cancer causing agent aspartame.

It is therefore likely that in yours, and especially in your child’s lifetime, most or all of these listed vaccine ingredients have been injected into your body, along with the various disease causing microbes, antibiotics (anti-life), and other ingredients not listed here. And your body reacts to every one of these ingredients, either in the short or long term as the manifestation of chronic disease states. I can think of nothing else to call this but sheer insanity. The blanket acceptance of the “science” of vaccination in my mind can only be attributed to two things. Ignorance is certinaly a fine-tuned and well oiled machine within the general population. But can we really blame sheer ignorance? What about custom, routine, greed, profits, and medical advice?

But what if there is another factor at play here? What if there is another unseen force that is driving people to promote and commit to actions like vaccination, eating junk food as their main staple, taking pharmaceutical drugs that will knowingly cause more severe disease than what they will treat, and submitting themselves to the unspeakable atrocities of modern and cosmetic medicine – which is by the way the leading cause by far of death in the world, called “iatrogenic” death, or death by medicine/doctor.

Is it possible that mankind could be driven subconsciously by another infective force more powerful than ignorance, more persuasive than propaganda, and more controlling than hypnosis?

And if this possibility may indeed be the case, would man even know he was infected?

This is the theory I’d like to explore herein…

–=–
The Parasite Lives By Control
And Knows No Other Path
–=–

I ask you now to become a neutral.

As I postulated in the opening of this thesis, I believe that any reader of this work may have only gotten this far due to their uninfected empathy and therefore unvaccinated desire to learn the answers to questions that cannot seem to be answered by merely considering what is known or by what is normal or natural. And so the question to the answer we seek may very well sit in the world of the unseen, and may therefore be hidden in the unknown. For the purely logical thinker, who needs proof of claim to every aspect of reality, I can only try my best to qualify the facts presented herein, for I cannot show you the unseeable. I have not the tools to make proof, and so I cannot prove the unprovable. And so I ask your forgiveness in this regard, and ask that you clear your mind of what you think you know so that your limiting perceptions of reality don’t get in your own way. Yet at the same time, I wish to invoke in you your use of the logic machine, the Trivium, and to examine what I present here with the goal not of belief or disbelief, but with the desire to prove or disprove – what the scientific method once also was designed to do instead of genetically altering everything so as to create falsely created evidence of a genetically altered reality.

The question I propose to answer here to the best of my rational ability is simply this:

Can the actions and inactions for which most of mankind are exhibiting in acting against its own best interest be attributed to a parasitic infection of his brain and DNA?

First, let’s place on the exhibit table the evidence of these actions of man against his own interest.

1) Geoengineering. It is being taught in universities around the world now. It is highly regulated in the codes and statutes of government, permits are required, and international treaties are law regarding its use in war and in peacetime. It is no longer a theory, but a certified and provable current practice. In other words, it is a provable conspiracy (plan between two or more people) to significantly and purposefully alter the environment, and is a highly protected industry by governments around the world, including the United Nations. If this fact is not readily apparent to the reader, then please see the links below. For those who can see it happening in the sky above them, again I can only assume according to my presented theory here that you are not parasitically restricted from recognition and comprehension of these strange happenings. Geoengeneering though, as defined and taught in the University system, is not merely the alteration of the air and atmosphere. It is the alteration of the land and oceans as well. For more factual information on this, please see my sourced research here:

https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2014/05/11/degrees-in-geo-engineering-and-sustainable-development/

https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2011/11/25/geoengineering-and-cloud-seeding/

https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2013/03/16/the-only-way-we-can-stop-geoengineering/

https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2012/08/25/research-tips/

https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2013/10/15/weather-modification-in-utah-begins-today/

2) Species Die Offs. As we sit back and watch with a helpless feeling and a bag of Funyons, we are digitally presented with facts and figures that the surface life on planet Earth, on both the land and in the ocean, is dying. We are shown images and videos of mass schools of dead fish washed up on shores or in harbors, of hundreds of birds falling dead from the sky mid-flight, and of statistical realities of millions of species of plants, animals, and insects becoming extinct. Is it at all strange to think that this may be directly correlated with the actions of man, if as above we can see that the organized actions of man are literally altering the entire biosphere of the planet on a global scale through quite purposeful Geoengineering? Where is the logic, the empathy, and the calvary, for we cannot live without the rest of nature? That is, unless man and nature are being fundamentally altered and with genomic precision reconstituted at the cellular level to survive as hosts within such a dystopia as is apparently being created by what is seemingly, if you will, men who may very well be parasitically infected and controlled at the cellular level. And so the question may no longer be who is causing the problems, but what is infecting the brains of the men who are causing these problems?

3) Natural Healthy Foods Are Being Outlawed. “Codex Alimentarius Austriacus,” is a collection of standards and product descriptions for a wide variety of foods developed In the Austrian-Hungarian Empire between 1897 and 1911 as a voluntary effort between “experts” in the food industry and in universities. Though used in legal proceedings for identity and standards purposes, this collection is not legally enforceable. However, the bastardization of this effort was created into what is today known as the international Codex Alimentarius Commission, part of the Food and Agricultural Organization and the World Health Organization of the United Nations, which is employed as the international food codex, or “law.” This integration as a legal overlord of food took place in Austrian law in 1975. The council was created in 1958 under the joint sponsorship of the International Commission on Agricultural Industries and the International Bureau of Analytical Chemistry. And you wonder why the ingredient list on your cereal box looks like a chemistry experiment? Today, Codex Alimentarius (Latin for “Book of Food”) is a collection of internationally recognized standards, codes of practice, guidelines and other recommendations relating to what is food, production of that food, and what is considered safe as food. Food is one of those things in nature that are, well, pretty damn self-evident. And while it’s probably a good thing to know enough about nature to eat from it without being poisoned, the extent of what is now being labeled as “food” and “food ingredients” defies all possible logic… unless of course the parasitic infection of man is taken into consideration!!! Simply stated, if a parasite were hungry for the nutrient diet it needs to survive, it is logical and provable in nature that the parasite would control the actions of its host in order to cause the man or other host to “infect” itself with “food stuffs” that are in actuality harmful, poisonous, and even fatal to the man but promotive of the parasite. Inversely, it would be a logical conclusion to assume that the parasite would do anything within its power to cause the man to cease to ingest anything that might harm the parasite that would otherwise be beneficial to the man, especially those food stuffs that would kill or prevent the growth and viability of parasites. Therefore, the reasonable conclusion to be made if indeed mankind is suffering from an ancient, highly advanced, parasitic intelligence that controls man’s will would be to assume that those men who organize to write laws, alter the environment, and promote or ban certain food stuffs and ingredients would be the ones being controlled by said parasites so as to act against the best interests of man and nature while at the same time promoting the best interests of the parasite. The host only lives to serve the parasite, as far as the parasite is concerned. This is evident all throughout nature, which we will explore the evidence of in depth later in this essay. And so the answer to one of the many questions the reader may be seeking as to ascertain what the hell is happening in the world may rely on the readers ability to contemplate this theory. Why are foods being re-engineered and genetically altered? Why are they being changed in a way that provably causes such harm to man and nature while men in high authority positions pass laws to protect these genetic alterations? If these men are indeed parasitically controlled, then the answer to these questions is quite clear. And this even answers what seemed before to be the great unanswerable preponderance of all who are asking such questions… Why are they knowingly causing harm to their own environment? Don’t they have to live here too? What about their children’s future? Here again the only truly logical answer is parasitic infection. Some may call them psychopaths. But what if they simply have no capability to act in anyone’s best interest but their own, which is now only in the best interest of the parasite controlling their actions? To give a few examples of this subversion of foods that might harm the parasite, we can think back to the half century mark when propaganda was just starting to take flight. Butter, animal fats, and other staples of diets around the world were suddenly being demonized. Soon, synthetic food products like margarine, American cheese, and shortening were being advertised as replacements for fats. What the reader might not know is that cholesterol, that is to say what was demonized as “bad cholesterol,” is listed in many government sponsored research studies as being the essential ingredient in expelling pathogens from the body. No cholesterol means that disease may flourish. Other examples are Cannabis Sativa, which has properties shown to prevent and destroy diseases like cancer. We are currently experiencing the total genetic alteration of this miracle plant by companies like Monsanto seeking to genetically alter it so as to patent and control its use. The therapeutic uses, therefore, are being bred out of the plant and who knows what is being bred into it. Both marijuana and cholesterol are proven to prevent the spread of prion disease, but only in their natural form. Genetically altered stains will be useless for medical purposes, just as margarine is. Though countless examples persist, where the alteration or banning of foods, spices, seeds, and plants that are extremely healthy and more importantly can cure disease, are outrightly being replaced with synthetics, most of us in our right mind cannot even come close to creating a good reason why this is taking place against humanities best interests. And yet, here again, parasitic infection of the minds of those participating in this “food science” is in fact the only plausible answer. Not greed, not profits, and not ignorance. It seems no other plausible reason exists!

4. Unprecedented Technological Advancement. In 1946, ENIAC (Electronic Numerical Integrator and Computer) was unveiled as the supposed first true all-purpose electronic computer. Weighing in at 30 tons, the size of two semis, and consisting of 19,000 vacuum tubes, 6,000 switches, and requiring many human attendants to answer to incredible amounts of blinking lights. It had the capability in unheard of marvel to add 5,000 numbers in a single second! And it could predict through this powerful computation the trajectory of an artillery shell before it landed. Naturally it was government (military) funded! Just 20 years later, “the hand-held pocket calculator was invented at Texas Instruments, Incorporated (TI) in 1966, following their invention of the first integrated circuit in 1958, subsequently patented in 1964. In 1974, the miniature electronic calculator came into being along with the Texas Instruments’ patent for personal-sized, battery-operated calculators using a single integrated semiconductor circuit array or “one-chip” calculators. 12 years later, in 1986, calculators still represented an estimated 41% of the world’s general-purpose hardware capacity to compute information. Flashing forward only 21 years to 2007, calculators had reportedly been replaced by personal computers to the point that calculator use diminished to less than 0.05% use by 2007. And here we are today, with the 30 ounce computer replacing the 30 ton ENIAC in less than 70 years. Let’s compare that to the invention of the light bulb. In 1801, British inventor Humphry Davy invented an incandescent light bulb, and later created the “arc lamp” in 1809. Though many similar inventions were created over the years, it was not until 1880 (79 years later) that Joseph Wilson Swan became the first man with a house lit by a lightbulb at the same time Edison was plagiarizing his own patents for profit of what should be free energy. 78 years… And yet in today’s high tech world we are seeing technology double every few months or years. Many theories have been attributed to this impossible race of technological breakthroughs, including the reverse engineering of alien technology and even aliens themselves doing the work. But what if the aliens were merely parasites? What if the question is not which man is inventing things today so rapidly in succession, but instead we should be asking how is such sudden knowledge possible? Is it ancient knowledge? Is it parasitic infection that is driving the intent of men to create nuclear bombs, biological weapons, Geoengineering designs, genomic subversion and mapping, and the host of other inventions that go so far against nature and the self-interest of mankind that no other explanation makes any logical sense? In one year, 200 trillion bases of DNA catalogued… which was more than all previous years put together. Does that seem reasonable to you? Does anything our leaders and organizations or corporations are doing today seem reasonable or logical to you? Have you ever talked to anyone who is capable of inventing such super-advanced technology, or just the people who put the parts together and operate the machinery? Do they really know how it works? Could they re-create the technology that machines are programed to produce and manufacture today, or are they just worker bees for the parasite hive-mind? And let’s not forget to mention the strange advent of transhumanism, i.e. the genetic alteration of humans to interface with machines or synthetic biologic technologies.

While other examples could be looked at, perhaps it is time to explain just where I could possibly have gotten this strange notion from.

–=–

Meet The Family: Toxoplasmosis Rules!

–=–

This is a fascinating look into cross-species protozoan parasitic infection, which literally makes a rat act against its best interest (its own life) by making it sexually attracted to it’s most deadly enemy. It gives rewards for stupid behavior. And this parasite purposefully infects the rat just to get itself into the cat’s stomach after it eats the rat.

When toxoplasmosis infects the human brain, it also seems to create feelings of sexual reward and pleasure through dopamine production for dangerous behavior. In other words, the human is rewarded for acting against his or her best interest.

What does the government say about this?

From the CDC website we read:

Toxoplasmosis is considered to be a leading cause of death attributed to foodborne illness in the United States. More than 60 million men, women, and children in the U.S. carry the Toxoplasma parasite, but very few have symptoms because the immune system usually keeps the parasite from causing illness.

However, women newly infected with Toxoplasma during pregnancy and anyone with a compromised immune system should be aware that toxoplasmosis can have severe consequences.

Toxoplasmosis is considered one of the Neglected Parasitic Infections, a group of five parasitic diseases that have been targeted by CDC for public health action.

Source–> http://www.cdc.gov/parasites/toxoplasmosis/index.html

–=–

Keep in mind that science of vaccines and the various frequency generators in our modern conveniences specifically weakens the immune system, as do many pharmaceutical drugs.

The International Scientific Times reports:

Scientists say that the Toxoplasma gondii parasite, or Toxo for short, living in 40 percent of our brains affects our sense of fear and risk-taking. Researchers found that rats, with which humans share a number of characteristics with, infected with the Toxo parasite were attracted to the smell of cat urine, instead of being afraid of it.

“Pathways that normally responded to the smell of cat urine with alarm had been damped down, while the pleasure hormone dopamine, normally released in response to female rodent urine, was now triggered by the whiff of cat,” The Telegraph reports. Scientists say it’s all part of the parasite’s way of spreading from host to host – rats that aren’t afraid of cats are more likely to be eaten by them, thereby spreading the parasite to the cat.

In human studies, the findings were similarly alarming. While men infected with the parasite were more likely to become introverted and dress down, infected women behaved just the opposite – dressing up and acting more sociable. The more likely a person is to interact with others, the better chances the parasite has of passing itself on.

Joanne Webster, professor of parasite epidemiology at Imperial College London, told The Telegraph that parasites prefer the brain because it is removed from the body’s immune system and also because it gives them “direct access” to the mechanisms of behavior.

We’ve known about the Toxo parasite since the 1920s, when scientists learned that the parasite was present in the feces of cats. During the AIDS epidemic, before antiretroviral drugs were effective and more widely available, the Toxo parasite was blamed for the dementia that many AIDS patients experienced towards the end of their lives.

The idea that parasites could control human behavior was first investigated in the early 1990s by an evolutionary biologist at Charles University in Prague named Jaroslav Flegr.

“There is strong psychological resistance to the possibility that human behavior can be influenced by some stupid parasite,” Flegr told the The Atlantic in March 2012.

He said he first learned of the ability of parasites to control their hosts 30 years ago after reading about how a certain flatworm can control ants by taking over their nervous systems. “It was the first I learned about this kind of manipulation, so it made a big impression on me,” Flegr said.

Source–> http://www.isciencetimes.com/articles/4792/20130328/toxoplasma-gondii-brain-parasite-40-percent-infected.htm

–=–

A human brain overrun with cysts from Taenia solium, a tapeworm that normally inhabits the muscles of pigs.

Gee… how could a pig parasite have gotten past the blood brain barrier unless it was injected?

–

–=–

“In terms of numbers, there are more parasitic infections
acquired in this country (United States) than in Africa.”

– Dr Frank Nova, NIH Parasitic Diseases Lab Chief

–=–

–

A recent issue of National Geographic came with the shocking cover story named “Real Zombies: The Strange Science of the Living Dead.”

Naturally, I was intrigued. And when I read the story, my worse fears were suddenly manifest, as it revealed some of the worst possible parasite infections in nature.

Perhaps the most shocking display of the designs that can be willed by the parasite to the host is this one:

“In Costa Rica, the orb-weaving spider Leucauge argyra will go to extravagant lengths to accommodate the needs of Hymenoepimecis argyraphaga, another freeloading wasp. The female glues its egg to the host’s body. After the larva emerges, it pokes a few holes in the spider’s abdomen and sucks its blood. When the larva has grown to full size, in a couple of weeks, the spider takes it upon itself to rip down its own web and build a new one of a radically different shape. Instead of a multistranded net designed for catching flying insects, the new web is merely a few thick cables converging at a central point. Having sucked its host dry, the larva spins its cocoon on a thread hanging from the intersection of the cables. Suspended in the air, the cocoon is nearly impossible for would-be predators to reach.”

Considering this dramatic takeover of the mind, where the spider is literally stripped of its natural instincts of survival in order to protect its unwelcome parasitic guest and thus mind-controlled to be made to demolish its own web, is it at all unreasonable to assume that this may be happening in the human population as well, which is observably and virtually doing just about the same thing?

“Zombie Virus” Possible via Rabies-Flu Hybrid?

Highly improbable genetic tweak could create mutant virus.

In the zombie flicks 28 Days Later and I Am Legend, an unstoppable viral plague sweeps across humanity, transforming people into mindless monsters with cannibalistic tendencies.

Though dead humans can’t come back to life, certain viruses can induce such aggressive, zombie-like behavior, scientists say in the new National Geographic Channel documentary The Truth Behind Zombies, premiering Saturday at 10 p.m. ET/PT. (National Geographic News is part of the National Geographic Society, which part-owns the National Geographic Channel.)

For instance, rabies—a viral disease that infects the central nervous system—can drive people to be violently mad, according to Samita Andreansky, a virologist at the University of Miami’s Miller School of Medicine in Florida who also appears in the documentary.

Combine rabies with the ability of a flu virus to spread quickly through the air, and you might have the makings of a zombie apocalypse.

Rabies Virus Mutation Possible?

Unlike movie zombies, which become reanimated almost immediately after infection, the first signs a human has rabies—such as anxiety, confusion, hallucinations, and paralysis—don’t typically appear for ten days to a year, as the virus incubates inside the body.

Once rabies sets in, though, it’s fatal within a week if left untreated.

If the genetic code of the rabies virus experienced enough changes, or mutations, its incubation time could be reduced dramatically, scientists say.

Many viruses have naturally high mutation rates and constantly change as a means of evading or bypassing the defenses of their hosts.

There are various ways viral mutations can occur, for example through copying mistakes during gene replication or damage from ultraviolet light.

“If a rabies virus can mutate fast enough, it could cause infection within an hour or a few hours. That’s entirely plausible,” Andreansky said.

Airborne Rabies Would Create “Rage Virus”

But for the rabies virus to trigger a zombie pandemic like in the movies, it would also have to be much more contagious.

Humans typically catch rabies after being bitten by an infected animal, usually a dog—and the infection usually stops there.

Thanks to pet vaccinations, people rarely contract rabies in the United States today, and even fewer people die from the disease. For example, in 2008 only two cases of human rabies infection were reported to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

A faster mode of transmission would be through the air, which is how the influenza virus spreads.

“All rabies has to do is go airborne, and you have the rage virus” like in 28 Days Later, Max Mogk, head of the Zombie Research Society, says in the documentary. The international nonprofit is devoted to “raising the level of zombie scholarship in the Arts and Sciences,” according to their website.

To be transmitted by air, rabies would have to “borrow” traits from another virus, such as influenza.

Different forms, or strains, of the same virus can swap pieces of genetic code through processes called reassortment or recombination, said Elankumaran Subbiah, a virologist at Virginia Tech who was not involved in the documentary.

But unrelated viruses simply do not hybridize in nature, Subbiah told National Geographic News.

Likewise, it’s scientifically unheard of for two radically different viruses such as rabies and influenza to borrow traits, he said.

“They’re too different. They cannot share genetic information. Viruses assemble only parts that belong to them, and they don’t mix and match from different families.”

Engineered Zombie Virus Possible?

It’s theoretically possible—though extremely difficult—to create a hybrid rabies-influenza virus using modern genetic-engineering techniques, the University of Miami’s Andreansky said.

“Sure, I could imagine a scenario where you mix rabies with a flu virus to get airborne transmission, a measles virus to get personality changes, the encephalitis virus to cook your brain with fever”—and thus increase aggression even further—”and throw in the ebola virus to cause you to bleed from your guts. Combine all these things, and you’ll [get] something like a zombie virus,” she said.

“But [nature] doesn’t allow all of these things to happen at the same time. … You’d most likely get a dead virus.”

Source–> http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/10/1001027-rabies-influenza-zombie-virus-science/

–=–

Notice that the rule spoken over and over is that “nature” will not allow this type of recombinant mixing to happen. But let’s not forget that science isn’t interested in respecting the limits of nature, but instead seeks to conquer every aspect of it. Recombination happens in the lab, and new recombinations are patented as property of these madmen. Whether this is just human curiosity or parasitic will that is creating the insanity that is the institutional destruction of all that is sacred to man and nature unfortunately cannot be answered here. But the evidence provided here I dare say supports the very possible, even probable theory that this just might be the case.

–=–
The Thing Test
–=–

So what in the hell can we do about this if it is a reality? After all, we can’t see them if they are indeed controlling a portion of humanity.

The real question is whether an infected human would voluntarily be able to submit him or herself to any test conceived to find out! After all, such a test would be against the best interest of the parasite, and the expression of this will to stay hidden would probably be transferred to the personality of the host.

In John Carpenter’s “The Thing,” where the stranded victims could not tell who was the parasite and who was the human, they developed a test which burned the blood samples of each subject. When the parasitic blood was burned, the reaction gave evidence of infection.

–=–

So could such a test be used to detect those who are either infected or not infected?

Before I go all science fiction on you, I’d like to explore another avenue of control that may be explained by this parasitic infection of humanity. That is the notion of harmonic resonance and the spectrum of frequency.

One of the most tightly regulated areas in the world are the airwaves. The control and tuning of broadcast and other frequency is so governed and policed that the penalty for using the air without strict guidelines and permission from the state is harsh to say the least. I have often speculated, considering the history of Royal Rife, Tesla, and other researchers into the power of frequency to both heal and destroy life, including parasites, that the reasons for the “standards and practices” in broadcasting may very well be friendly to a parasitic infection, which would be in control of the regulators. With the advent of localized smart meters, cell phones, and other frequency radiation admiting and receiving devices that are provably dangerous to human health, I find myself ever more curious that we again knowingly act against our own best interest by ignoring the warnings and actual data.

It is a standard test, for instance, to use ultra-sound frequency in autopsy to literally activate and excite prions which in turn start mis-folding the healthy brain prions, infecting what is left of the healthy brain. This method is a specific frequency that benefits prions, and so the assumption is that there would also be an equal and opposite reaction with other specific ultra-sound ranges of frequency. Royal Rife certainly proved this to be the case with many organisms, speculating that all life had both health and death frequency ranges.

And so I musingly wonder if maybe, just maybe, it could very well be frequency that might be our Thing test.

Perhaps the foreshadowing of this in many science fiction movies may prevent us from realizing the reality of the fiction. After all, when Mars Attacks, no body really believes this can happen:

–=–

The alteration of the tuning of instruments is an interesting story, with the usual players. Rockafeller interests funded the United Nations in New York City, and thus within was spawned the International Standards Organization (ISO) based in London. From this organization was set the new global standard in musical tuning, from the harmonious and Biblical mathematical perfection of the healthy 432 hz to the now standard 440 hz, which is not harmonic with human health and vibration.

The very interesting history can be found here: https://atrueott.wordpress.com/2014/10/16/why-christians-and-worship-teams-should-tune-all-instruments-to-432-hz-and-abandon-440-hz/

So why the push to directly alter what was a standard tuning for generations?

Again, I can only state here that parasitic infection is a plausible answer to all of these questions.

After all this, one thing is certain. Mere conjecture as is posited here is not going to change anything. If indeed this theory is correct, we literally would have a war on our hands to save what remains of the natural order.

–=–
Archon Love
–=–

One final word about this theory… It’s not really mine.

While I am providing the evidence to support it, the truth is that this notion of mind parasites dates back for many centuries and from many different sources. The gnostics warned about these archons as demented mind parasites long ago. In my understanding, even the Bible warns not to cross species and races, perhaps even for this reason of creating unnatural chimeras. And yet here we are, cannibalizing our unborn like junkie freebasers, but for therapeutic reasons of course! Again I state that no one in their right mind would allow a doctor to inject human or animal proteins and DNA into their own body, especially aborted fetal tissue. But who among us is in their right minds? Logically, is it the vaccine user and abuser, or the “clean” vaccine opponent? The answer, it seems to me, lies microscopically within the very syringe in question.

The word archon is translated from Greek to mean ruler or lord, and sometimes master. The word is used to describe past kings, law-givers, and gods. But there is a more important translation I want to bring forward here…

Archaeon (är’kē-ŏn’) – Plural archaea –

Any of a group of microorganisms that resemble bacteria but are different from
them in certain aspects of their chemical structure, such as the composition of their
cell walls. Archaea usually live in extreme, often very hot or salty environments,
such as hot mineral springs or deep-sea hydrothermal vents, but some are also
found in animal digestive systems. The archaea are considered a separate
kingdom in some classifications, but a division of the prokaryotes (Monera) in
others. Some scientists believe that archaea were the earliest forms of
cellular life. Also called archaebacterium.

–The American Heritage® Science Dictionary

–=–

This is the story of the extremophile, including virtually indestructible prions. Extremophiles hate oxygen. They hate just about any environment that is healthy for human and animal life. Be it volcanos, hot springs, methane pockets, or deep freezes, the extremophile thrives in the antithesis of what we enjoy. It is important to note that with all of our meddling, the oxygen levels of the Earth are also shrinking away, again creating a more parasite friendly environment for these extremophiles while, not ironically, causing more disease susceptibility and infect-ability in humans. Just another modern global event that can certainly be explained by parasites. But nothing to see here, right?

Form the Encyclopedia Britanica we read the entry for archaea:

In some systems for classifying all of life, the archaea constitute one of three great domains of living creatures. In 1977 American microbiologist Carl Woese, on the basis of analyses of ribosomal RNA, proposed that the prokaryotes, long considered to be a single group of organisms (essentially, the bacteria), actually consist of two separate lineages. Woese called these two lineages the eubacteria and the archaebacteria. These names were subsequently changed to bacteria and archaea (the archaea being distinctly different from bacteria), but Woese’s splitting of the prokaryotes into two groups has remained, and all living organisms are now considered by many biologists to fall into one of three great domains: Archaea, Bacteria, and Eukarya. Further molecular analysis has shown that domain Archaea consists of two major subdivisions, the Crenarchaeota and the Euryarchaeota, and two minor ancient lineages, the Korarchaeota and the Nanoarchaeota.

Habitats of the archaea

Archaea are microorganisms that define the limits of life on Earth. They were originally discovered and described in extreme environments, such as hydrothermal vents and terrestrial hot springs. They were also found in a diverse range of highly saline, acidic, and anaerobic environments.

Although many of the cultured archaea are extremophiles, these organisms in their respective extreme habitats represent only a minority of the total diversity of the Archaea domain. The majority of archaea cannot be cultured within the laboratory setting, and their ubiquitous presence in global habitats has been realized through the use of culture-independent techniques. One commonly used culture-independent technique is the isolation and analysis of nucleic acids (i.e., DNA and RNA) directly from an environment, rather than the analysis of cultured samples isolated from the same environment. Culture-independent studies have shown that archaea are abundant and fulfill important ecological roles in cold and temperate ecosystems. Uncultivated organisms in the subdivision Crenarchaeota are postulated to be the most abundant ammonia-oxidizing organisms in soils and to account for a large proportion (roughly 20 percent) of the microorganisms present in the picoplankton in the world’s oceans. In the subdivision Euryarchaeota, uncultivated organisms in deep-sea marine sediments are responsible for the removal of methane, a potent greenhouse gas, via anaerobic oxidation of methane stored in these sediments. In contrast, uncultivated methanogenic (methane-producing) euryarchaea from terrestrial anaerobic environments, such as rice fields, are estimated to generate approximately 10–25 percent of global methane emissions.

The cultured representatives of the Crenarchaeota are from high-temperature environments, such as hot springs and submarine hydrothermal vents. Likewise, cultured members of the Euryarchaeota include organisms isolated from hot environments, organisms that are methanogenic, and organisms that grow vigorously in high-salt environments (halophiles). Organisms in the lineages Korarchaeota and Nanoarchaeota also inhabit high-temperature environments; however, the nanoarchaea are highly unusual because they grow and divide on the surface of another archaea, Ignicoccus. Nanoarchaea, which were discovered in 2002, contain both the smallest known living cell (1/100th the size of Escherichia coli) and the smallest known genome (480 kilobases [1 kilobase = 1,000 base pairs of DNA]; for comparison, the human genome contains 3 million kilobases). Members of the Korarchaeota and Nanoarchaeota have not been detected in pure culture; rather, they have been detected only in mixed laboratory cultures.

Archaea are also found living in association with eukaryotes; for example, methanogenic archaea are present in the digestive systems of some animals, including humans. Some archaea also form symbiotic relationships with sponges; in fact, Cenarchaeum symbiosum was grown in the laboratory with its host sponge and was the first nonthermophilic Crenarchaeota to be cultured and described.

–=–

How many times have you heard the notion that a healthy human body must be in balance between acidic and alkaline Ph levels, and that disease flourishes in an acidic environment? Well so do archons (archaea). They like methane. They like extreme environments. They like stomach acid.

But more importantly they don’t like oxygen, they don’t like ozone, and thrive in anaerobic environments. Thus one curative measure might be to flood the body with the purest of oxygen, or to commit to oxygen therapy where the blood is oxygenated outside the body and reinserted. The trend and sophist popularity of anti-oxydents is suspect as well for these reasons. You can listen to my interviews with Mr. Oxygen (Ed McCabe) here:

Show #1 Ed McCabe (Mr. Oxygen):
https://corporationnationradioarchives.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/show140_may12.mp3

Show #2 Ed McCabe (Mr. Oxygen):
https://corporationnationradioarchives.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/show145_may19.mp3

His websites:

http://www.mroxygen.org/

http://oxygenhealth.com/

http://www.ozoneuniversity.com/index.html

Archaea are ancient forms of life compared to us. They are an RNA-based life form. It is RNA that controls the DNA switches of the epigenome. And the intelligence of this kingdom and domain of life is not measurable within the limited communication structure of man. We are indeed competitive life forms.

For a basic model of the communication and control that encoded RNA expresses over DNA, and how this archaea RNA life form might intercept that communication through transcription to control the host body, here is the technical jargon:

DNA transcription is a process that involves transcribing genetic information from DNA toRNA. The transcribed DNA message, or RNA transcript, is used to produce proteins. DNA is housed within the nucleus of our cells. It controls cellular activity by coding for the production of proteins. The information in DNA is not directly converted into proteins, but must first be copied into RNA. This ensures that the information contained within the DNA does not become tainted. DNA consists of four nucliotide bases [adenine (A), guanine (G), cytosine (C), and thymine (T) ] that are paired together (A-T and C-G) to give DNA its double helical shape. Nucleotide base sequences are the genetic code or instructions for protein synthesis.

Elongation – Certain proteins called transcription factors unwind the DNA strand and allow RNA polymerase to transcribe only a single strand of DNA into a single stranded RNA polymer called messenger RNA (mRNA). The strand that serves as the template is called the antisense strand. The strand that is not transcribed is called the sense strand. Like DNA, RNA is composed of nucleotide bases. RNA however, contains the nucleotides adenine, guanine, cytosine, and uracil (U). When RNA polymerase transcribes the DNA, guanine pairs with cytosine and adenine pairs with uracil.

Termination – RNA polymerase moves along the DNA until it reaches a terminator sequence. At that point, RNA polymerase releases the mRNA polymer and detaches from the DNA.

There are three main steps to the process of DNA transcription.

RNA Polymerase Binds to DNA – DNA is transcribed by an enzyme called RNA polymerase. Specific nucleotide sequences tell RNA polymerase where to begin and where to end. RNA polymerase attaches to the DNA at a specific area called the promoter region. Since proteins are constructed in the cytoplasm of the cell, mRNA must cross the nuclear membrane to reach the cytoplasm. Once in the cytoplasm, ribosomes and another RNA molecule called transfer RNA work together to translate mRNA into a protein. This process is called translation . Proteins can be manufactured in large quantities because a single DNA sequence can be transcribed by many RNA. Protein synthesis is accomplished through a process called translation. After DNA is transcribed into a messenger RNA (mRNA) molecule during transcription, the mRNA must be translated to produce a protein. In translation, mRNA along with transfer RNA (tRNA) and ribosomes work together to produce proteins.

Protein Synthesis: Transfer RNA – Transfer RNA plays a huge role in protein synthesis and translation. Its job is to translate the message within the nucleotide sequence of mRNA to a specific amino acid sequence. These sequences are joined together to form a protein. Transfer RNA is shaped like a clover leaf with three loops. It contains an amino acid attachment site on one end and a special section in the middle loop called the anticodon site. The anticodon recognizes a specific area on a mRNA called a codon.

Protein Synthesis: Messenger RNA Modifications – Translation occurs in the cytoplasm . After leaving the nucleus , mRNA must undergo several modifications before being translated. Sections of the mRNA that do not code for amino acids, called introns, are removed. A poly-A tail, consisting of several adenine bases, is added to one end of the mRNA, while a guanosine triphosphate cap is added to the other end. These modifications remove unneeded sections and protect the ends of the mRNA molecule. Once all modifications are complete, mRNA is ready for translation.

Protein Synthesis – Translation – Once mRNA has been modified and is ready for translation, it binds to a specific site on a ribosome . Ribosomes consist of two parts, a large subunit and a small subunit. They contain a binding site for mRNA and two binding sites for tRNA located in the large ribosomal subunit. During translation, a small ribosomal subunit attaches to a mRNA molecule. At the same time an initiator tRNA molecule recognizes and binds to a specific codon sequence on the same mRNA molecule. A large ribosomal subunit then joins the newly formed complex. The initiator tRNA resides in one binding site of the ribosome called the P site, leaving the second binding site, the A site, open. When a new tRNA molecule recognizes the next codon sequence on the mRNA, it attaches to the open A site. A peptide bond forms connecting the amino acid of the tRNA in the P site to the amino acid of the tRNA in the A binding site.

As the ribosome moves along the mRNA molecule, the tRNA in the P site is released and the tRNA in the A site is translocated to the P site. The A binding site becomes vacant again until another tRNA that recognizes the new mRNA codon takes the open position. This pattern continues as molecules of tRNA are released from the complex, new tRNA molecules attach, and the amino acid chain grows. The ribosome will translate the mRNA molecule until it reaches a termination codon on the mRNA. When this happens, the growing protein called a polypeptide chain is released from the tRNA molecule and the ribosome splits back into large and small subunits. The newly formed polypeptide chain undergoes several modifications before becoming a fully functioning protein. Proteins have a variety of functions . Some will be used in the membrane of the cell, while others will remain in the cytoplasm or be transported out of the cell. Many copies of a protein can be made from one mRNA molecule. This is because several ribosomes can translate the same mRNA molecule at the same time. These clusters of ribosomes that translate a single mRNA sequence are called polyribosomes or polysomes.

Source–> http://biology.about.com/od/cellularprocesses/ss/Dna-Transcription.htm

–=–

For the tech-savvy mind, we can read government sponsored research about signal transcription and communication between RNA archaea and human DNA here. It is very important to understand that this type of research is in mass and ongoing, and is very concerning when considering again our theory. Who or what is guiding these studies and for what purpose? And the real mind bending question becomes: Could man do this and other research and invention without a little help from his archaeon friends?

Determinants of transcription initiation by archaeal RNA polymerase.

Abstract

Transcription in Archaea is catalyzed by an RNA polymerase that is most similar to eukaryotic RNA polymerases both in subunit composition and in transcription initiation factor requirements. Recent studies on archaeal transcription in diverse members of this domain have contributed new details concerning the functions of promoters and transcription factors in guiding initiation by RNA polymerase, and phylogenetic arguments have allowed modeling of archaeal transcription initiation complexes by comparison with recently described models of eukaryotic and bacterial transcription initiation complexes. Important new advances in reconstitution of archaeal transcription complexes from fully recombinant components is permitting testing of hypotheses derived from and informed by these structural models, and will help bring the study of archaeal transcription to the levels of understanding currently enjoyed by bacterial and eukaryotic RNA polymerase II transcription.

Source–> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16249119

–=–

Transcription factor B contacts promoter DNA near the transcription start site of the archaeal transcription initiation complex.

Abstract

Transcription initiation in all three domains of life requires the assembly of large multiprotein complexes at DNA promoters before RNA polymerase (RNAP)-catalyzed transcript synthesis. Core RNAP subunits show homology among the three domains of life, and recent structural information supports this homology. General transcription factors are required for productive transcription initiation complex formation. The archaeal general transcription factors TATA-element-binding protein (TBP), which mediates promoter recognition, and transcription factor B (TFB), which mediates recruitment of RNAP, show extensive homology to eukaryal TBP and TFIIB. Crystallographic information is becoming available for fragments of transcription initiation complexes (e.g. RNAP, TBP-TFB-DNA, TBP-TFIIB-DNA), but understanding the molecular topography of complete initiation complexes still requires biochemical and biophysical characterization of protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions. In published work, systematic site-specific protein-DNA photocrosslinking has been used to define positions of RNAP subunits and general transcription factors in bacterial and eukaryal initiation complexes. In this work, we have used systematic site-specific protein-DNA photocrosslinking to define positions of RNAP subunits and general transcription factors in an archaeal initiation complex. Employing a set of 41 derivatized DNA fragments, each having a phenyl azide photoactivable crosslinking agent incorporated at a single, defined site within positions -40 to +1 of the gdh promoter of the hyperthermophilic marine archaea, Pyrococcus furiosus (Pf), we have determined the locations of PfRNAP subunits PfTBP and PfTFB relative to promoter DNA. The resulting topographical information supports the striking homology with the eukaryal initiation complex and permits one major new conclusion, which is that PfTFB interacts with promoter DNA not only in the TATA-element region but also in the transcription-bubble region, near the transcription start site. Comparison with crystallographic information implicates the PfTFB N-terminal domain in the interaction with the transcription-bubble region. The results are discussed in relation to the known effects of substitutions in the TFB and TFIIB N-terminal domains on transcription initiation and transcription start-site selection.

Source–> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14597623

–=–

In biology, the word homology as used in this study refers to the existence of shared ancestry between a pair of structures, or genes, in different species. In other words, RNA archaea can interact with DNA humans. We are compatible in a parasite-to-host kind of way. If that still isn’t clear, the archons can control us like puppets by utilizing transcription factors in the DNA transcription (communication) process of transfer RNA in protien syntheses.

This is a little bit like explaining the way a computer works in its communication by viewing the movie TRON. In the human body, this communication process of transcription that creates who we are and what our intentions will be manifested as is a bit like writing a book. The RNA must enconde the DNA and thus send various proteins throughout the body, be it for the immune response or cognitive response. These proteins are small enough to penetrate the brain.

So what is the difference between these cells, and why should we be concerned that archaeon RNA is most similar to eukaryotic RNA in regards to this transcription process?

Cells in our world come in two basic types, prokaryotic and eukaryotic. “Karyose” comes from a Greek word which means “kernel,” as in a kernel of grain. In biology, we use this word root to refer to the nucleus of a cell. “Pro” means “before,” and “eu” means “true,” or “good.” So “Prokaryotic” means “before a nucleus,” and “eukaryotic” means “possessing a true nucleus.” This is a big hint about one of the differences between these two cell types. Prokaryotic cells have no nuclei, while eukaryotic cells do have true nuclei.

Source–> http://www.cod.edu/PEOPLE/FACULTY/FANCHER/ProkEuk.htm

–=–

Could the archaea be attributed with other qualities as well, such as king-maker? Does it explain the bloodlines and blood-types of the kings and popes being exclusively Rh-, and are the archons passed from one infected generation to to the next? Can publications like the Talmud and the Authorized King James Bible be the manifestation of this control factor? What about non-linear, 4rth generation, and other modern warfare methods, as expressed in such documents as Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars and the Iron Mountain Report? Can it explain the notion of the usurious corruption in banking, government, and religion, where vast designs of enslavement and control of the mind are institutionalized in ways that seem so incredibly convoluted and hidden that they would be impossible for man to invent? Does it explain the subversion of all that is good and nurturing in nature?

In conclusion, it seems we are in a tough position. I can only appeal to logic and reason here by providing the verifiable facts that make up the outline of this theory, and yet those traits have seemingly been hammered out of the majority of us through the very entertaining science fiction and fantasy genres that apparently reveal this reality over and over through a similitude of variations in story-telling. It’s a perfect way to hide things in plain sight if you think about it. Even the phrase conspiracy theory may be used here, though its user should be poked with a stick and examined for sanity and for brain parasites when considering that the conspiracy referred to would be responsible for the cognitive dissonance of that fallacious name-caller. I sometimes wonder if that blank stare and disconnect from reality that appears in peoples eyes when speaking to them about reality and possibility and the lines in the sky that form clouds is not some chemically induced archaeon response mechanism to keep its host in the dark about itself, like the toxoplasmosis pleasure response for stupid behavior. But I can only speculate…

And perhaps in the end that is the most frightening aspect of this whole theory. For, like the pod-people from The Body Snatchers, these seemingly psychopathic scientists, doctors, biologists, and Geoengineers would never be allowed by their parasitic infection to allow a “clean,” parasite-free person to challenge this theory in search of proof for it with funding or legitimacy for research. We would be spotted immediately; if not only for our uncontrolled, inquisitive minds in asking simply why?

If anything, this would make a fine script for a science fiction story. If only we could guess the way to a happy ending…

–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Wednesday, February 4rth, 2015

41 Comments

by realitybloger on February 4, 2015 • Permalink

Posted in Archons and Archaea, Extremophiles, Prion Disease, Xenotransplantation, Zombies

Posted by realitybloger on February 4, 2015

https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2015/02/04/archons-and-mind-parasites-and-extremophiles-oh-my/

Degrees In Geo-Engineering And Sustainable Development

–

“Geoengineering’ is a new term, still seeking a definition.
It seems to imply something global, intentional, and unnatural…”

–Thomas Schelling, 1996

–

–=–

–

“But there are at least 26 reasons why geoengineering may be a bad idea.
These include disruption of the Asian and African summer monsoons,
reducing precipitation to the food supply for billions of people;
ozone depletion; no more blue skies; reduction of solar power;
and rapid global warming if it stops.”

–Alan Robock, Professor, Department of Environmental Sciences,
Rutgers University, 2013

–

–=–
A Crash Course:
Geo-Engineering 101
–=–

–

If you are like me, you’ve given up pointing to the unnatural lines in the sky in a futile effort to try and convince people about the reality of Geo-Engineering, also commonly but incorrectly called “chemtrails”. The permanent haze that inhabits and incubates our horizons seems somehow perfectly natural to most people. Go figure…

Through officially sourced grammar and logic, I continuously try and present different reasonable ways to show that this phenomenon of weather and climate manipulation and engineering through pseudo-science is happening right under- er, over everyone on Earth’s collective noses. Obviously, the strangeness of visibly organized pollution in the sky is not enough. After all, straight lines don’t happen in nature, or so I’ve heard. X’s, hexagrams, and pentagrams, therefore, should be a real eye-opener considering they are being written overtly for all to see.

And so to supplement the obvious spraying of our skies, I’ve presented within several research articles the legal laws regulating Geo-Engineering both nationally and internationally. I’ve dug up and presented government announcements of weather modification and their results around the globe. I’ve linked, copied, and pasted the various international treaties and white papers, military weather weaponization projects and plans to control the weather, and even the very public notices in newspapers from across the world stating clearly the corporate intent to get permission and license from government to create “Weather Modification” through Geo-Engineering.

And so I continuously ask myself… What else can I possibly present as proof of this ultimately destructive death-sentence to man and nature to the ultimate skeptics and useful innocents out there?

Today, as I watched yet another presentation by Dane Wigington of “GeoEngineering Watch” (geoengineeringwatch.com), a strange thought occurred to me… How can there be so many experts, scientists, and lecturers within this now open field of Geo-Engineering? Who exactly made them the official “experts” on modifying the weather? Where did they get their credentials? And where did they earn their masters and PhD of climate change and environmental engineering theory?

In other words, I thought… Is it possible that colleges actually offer courses and even specialized degrees in “Geo-Engineering”?

The answer was quite shocking, and is yet another trophy of the true idiocy of mankind, that something so real and taking place right over our collective heads should be treated as just crazy nonsense and mere “conspiracy theory”.

But as I was searching for and finding a multitude of accredited college courses and degrees in “Geo-Engineering”, something much more sophisticated and sinister began to take form. I started to notice the overwhelming push and descriptions of Agenda 21/Sustainable Development ideals being published along side of these Geo-Engineering courses. The effects of “climate change” and both its effect and causality on society as a social medium for career oriented jobs in Agenda 21 became the obvious and main interconnected theme. And it is now
apparent to me that the altering of the climate through many different forms of Geo-Engineering in the air, within the ocean, upon and beneath the land, and even within the societal and social/urban realm and its impact and control of “sustainable”, “green”, “smart” population centers due to said environmental engineering is now becoming a most sought after career choice in both the public and private sectors.

Apparently, the process of changing the climate through Geo-Engineering requires a diverse team of players, thinkers, designers, monitors, grunts, and data collection specialists. And as it turns out, many of these career fields can be entered into on different levels with either an Associates, Bachelors, Masters, or PHD in “Geo-Engineering”.

As I thought critically about our current generations of children and newly young adults, all of whom have grown up with a personal computer and an internet-linked cell-phone as their constant companions and guide – in a world where video games and media have dominated over nature and reality – we now have entire generations that actually believe with perfect reason in the concept that completely altering and disrupting the climate and designing the sustainable urban centers and green livelihoods of all people in controlled environments is a perfectly reasonable career choice. In short, nerds are in the process of taking over everything, using their models and projections to create a computer-controlled weather system while using the actual ecosystem and atmosphere as their no-2nd-chance testing ground. True empathy and appreciation of the laws of nature has been removed. And somehow in its place a false sense of god-complex has taken over the psyche of our aspiring youth, who believe that altering nature and creating new genetically modified life to suit these man-made “engineered” changes to the environment and to nature’s cycle of life itself is perfectly acceptable and moral behavior. Amazingly, as we will read, Geo-Engineering is being sold as something these freshly and ethically lobotomized young minds can do as a career to save the world, save the population, and be hero’s outside of the virtual video game realm.

It’s truly a nerd’s wet dream. I know, for I grew up in the first-nerd generation with my Commodore 64, the original Pong and Atari cartridge-game systems, and pre-clone IBM personal computers that could barely animate stick figures let alone model all life on the planet. And after watching and personally managing the evolution of gaming and media while working 7 years in the development process as a sound designer and engineer, I shutter to think of where my own state of reality and empathy would be today had I been indoctrinated in modern technology – if I would have been born too late to see the evolution of this digital process and instead would have been born smack in the middle of its “miracle” to be considered second nature.

I have compiled the following unbelievable collection of educational opportunities in the field of Geo-Engineering, so that the next time someone looks at you like your a nutter when you point to the lines in the sky, you can show them the reality of their own part in playing the fool…

—=–
GradSchools.com
–=–

GradSchools.com explains and defines “GeoEngineering” and lists many top universities offering “sustainable” courses in this field, and then amazingly lists dozens and dozens of acredited colleges that offer courses in environmental engineering:

GeoEngineering Graduate Programs

GeoEngineering is also known as environmental engineering; it refers to the process of intervening in the earth’s climate system for the purpose of mitigating climate change. It encompasses two primary practices: carbon dioxide removal andsolar radiation management.

GeoEngineering is a relatively new field. Graduate programs that may involve geoengineering include ocean technology, civil and environmental engineering, geological engineering, aerospace engineering, hydrology and GPS technology. Both campus based and online GeoEngineering graduate schools exist.

GeoEngineering Graduate Programs and Curriculum

Interested students can explore geoengineering in the context of disciplines ranging from environmental engineering to ocean technology. Students pursuing graduate degrees in these areas may take classes ranging from earthquake engineering to dynamics of ocean structures.

Source: http://www.gradschools.com/search-programs/geoengineering

–=–
U.C. Berkley
–=–

The U.C. Berkley campus offers degrees in Geo and Environmental Engineering for the climate as well:

Energy, Civil Infrastructure and Climate

The objective of the Energy, Civil Infrastructure and Climate (ECIC) program is to educate a cadre of professionals who will be able to analyze from engineering, environmental, economic, and management perspectives complex problems such as energy efficiency of buildings, environmentally informed design of transportation systems, embodied energy of construction materials, electricity from renewable sources, and biofuels, and address such overarching societal problems as mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions and adaptation of infrastructure to a changing climate. The ECIC program also promotes research at the intersection of energy, infrastructure and climate science…

— Energy, climate, and infrastructure systems are closely tied together, and these connections manifest in many forms. Our society cannot function without energy and infrastructure systems. Energy systems with the lowest possible greenhouse gas footprint are a key to mitigating climate change. Civil infrastructure systems are a backbone of society, and they are also major users of energy that needs to be reduced for a more sustainable development.

Source: http://www.ce.berkeley.edu/programs/ecic

Environmental Engineering

Management of environmental resources to protect human health and the systems that support life is one biggest challenges facing modern society. In recognition of the interdisciplinary nature of these challenges, UC Berkeley’s Environmental Engineering Program provides students with training needed to address current and future environmental issues.

Geoengineering

Geoengineering is an interdisciplinary program that offers excellent opportunities for students with background in Engineering and Earth Sciences who are interested in all aspects of soil and rock mass characterization, development of advanced simulation techniques, performance of earth structures and underground space, and identification and mitigation of natural hazards.

Source: http://www.ce.berkeley.edu/programs

–=–
Columbia University
–=–

Switching over to Columbia University:

…Master of science in Earth resources engineering (M.S.-E.R.E.) graduates are specially qualified to work for engineering, financial, and operating companies engaged in mineral processing ventures, the environmental industry, environmental groups of in all industries, and for city, state, and federal agencies responsible for the environment and energy/resource conservation. At the present time, the U.S. environmental industry comprises nearly 30,000 big and small businesses with total revenues over $150 billion. Sustainable development and environmental quality has become a top priority of industry and government in the U.S. and many other nations.

Water Resources and Climate Risks

Water Resources and Climate Risks focuses on the movement, availability, and quality of water throughout the Earth, on scales ranging from individual rivers and watersheds to the entire globe. Providing this valuable resource for society is the overarching goal, and the risks posed by climate variability, extremes, and change is an important and inherent part of all research projects. Specific projects range from the management of available supplies to forecasting future availability to underlying scientific mechanisms, and span a number of disciplines such as hydrology, hydroclimatology, water resources engineering, atmospheric dynamics, and land-atmosphere interaction…

A complementary degree (master of arts in climate and society) is available through Columbia University for students who are more directly interested in social or planning aspects of climate impacts, and are not quantitatively oriented.

Source: http://eee.columbia.edu/master-science-degree

–=–
University Of Texas, Austin
–=–

So who monitors all of this Geo-Engineering currently taking place? After all, someone needs to keep track of the changes in the Earth’s atmosphere from all that Geo-Engineering spraying. Well, first you need to go to college to learn all of this kind of stuff:

The Center for Integrated Earth System Science (CIESS) is a cooperative effort between the Jackson School of Geosciences and the Cockrell School of Engineering. The center fosters collaborative study of Earth as a coupled system with focus on land, atmosphere, water, environment, and society.

The center integrates the university’s strengths in earth system modeling, observing and monitoring, computational science and engineering, supercomputing, air resources engineering, hydrology and water resources, sedimentology and depositional processes, energy/policy, outreach/communications, and other fields.

The Center for Integrated Earth System Science (CIESS) seeks a deeper understanding of the physical chemical, biological and human interactions that determine the past, present and future states of Earth.

CIESS places a strong emphasis on the societal impacts of research in earth system science and provides a fundamental basis for understanding the world in which we live and seek sustainability.

CIESS views Earth in a holistic way, linking the atmosphere, ocean, biosphere, cryosphere, and solid earth as a coupled system. CIESS uses powerful methodologies such as satellite remote sensing and supercomputing simulations which are now profoundly changing research in earth system science.

Specifically, the goal of CIESS is to answer a wide variety of earth science questions including:

How do Earth’s atmosphere, ocean, biosphere, cryosphere, and lithosphere interact on all time and space scales?
How can we use in situ measurements, global satellite observations, proxy data, and computational analysis to describe and understand Earth’s dynamic system?
What has been the impact of human activity on Earth?
What is the future of our environment under climate change, land use change, and water use change?
How accurate are climate system models in providing seamless predictions at daily, seasonal, decadal or centennial timescales? Can we improve these predictions?
How can we reduce modeling uncertainties and make reliable predictions of extreme events at regional scales? How can we make rational decisions under uncertainties in order to mitigate, prevent, plan for or adapt to the negative potential impacts of global change? How can we apply the lessons learned from climate system models to other earth sciences and engineering?

Source: http://www.jsg.utexas.edu/ciess/

–=–
Harvard University:
Center For The Environment
–=–

Yes, even the most prestigious of schools are in on the game.

ABOUT THE WORKING GROUP

Solar geoengineering is the concept of deliberately cooling the Earth by reflecting a small amount of inbound sunlight back into space. It is the only currently known method for reducing temperatures in the short term (years to decades), and therefore has the potential to reduce many of the worst impacts of global warming. But what would be the side effects, both physical and socio-political? How would it work and who gets to decide if it is deployed? Does humanity have the wisdom and the institutions to govern the development of such a powerful technology in this messy, multi-polar world?

This seminar series, held jointly by the Harvard University Center for the Environment (HUCE) and MIT’s Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, will explore the science, technology, governance and ethics of solar geoengineering. In bringing together international experts, participants will learn some of the greatest challenges and hear opinions on how this technology could and should be managed.

A recent seminar just took place, for example, explaining the already conducted Geo-Engineering of our planet (click on link):

Wednesday, April 30
“Eastern Pacific Emitted Aerosol Cloud Experiment: Recent Findings and New Directions”
Lynn Russell, Professor of Atmospheric Chemistry, Scripps Institution of Oceanography
MIT, Building 35-225, 127 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge
5:00pm

And here Harvard states that a number of experiments have already been funded:

SOLAR GEOENGINEERING RESEARCH AROUND THE WORLD

There is a growing number of publicly funded geoengineering research programs around the world and this document is the first attempt to draw together the basic information on all of them in one place. It will update as new information becomes available. If it is missing any program information or there are any errors please contact andrew_parker@hks.harvard.edu or david_keith@harvard.edu.

Link to Harvard document keeping track of Geo-Engineering projects around the world: http://environment.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/srm_projects_around_the_world.pdf

–

–=–
University Of Oxford
Geoengineering Programme
–=-

–

At the University of Oxford, we can see that a program already exists to study the already existing effects of Geo-Engineering!

What is Geoengineering?

Geoengineering is the deliberate large-scale intervention in the Earth’s natural systems to counteract climate change.

There is wide range of proposed geoengineering techniques. Generally, these can be grouped into two categories:

Solar Radiation Management (SRM) or Solar Geoengineering

SRM techniques aim to reflect a small proportion of the Sun’s energy back into space, counteracting the temperature rise caused by increased levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere which absorb energy and raise temperatures. Some proposed techniques include:

Albedo enhancement. Increasing the reflectiveness of clouds or the land surface so that more of the Sun’s heat is reflected back into space.
Space reflectors. Blocking a small proportion of sunlight before it reaches the Earth.
Stratospheric aerosols. Introducing small, reflective particles into the upper atmosphere to reflect some sunlight before it reaches the surface of the Earth.

Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) or Carbon Geoengineering

CDR techniques aim to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, directly countering the increased greenhouse effect and ocean acidification. These techniques would have to be implemented on a global scale to have a significant impact on carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere. Some proposed techniques include:

Afforestation. Engaging in a global-scale tree planting effort.
Biochar. ‘Charring’ biomass and burying it so that its carbon is locked up in the soil.
Bio-energy with carbon capture and sequestration. Growing biomass, burning it to create energy and capturing and sequestering the carbon dioxide created in the process.
Ambient Air Capture. Building large machines that can remove carbon dioxide directly from ambient air and store it elsewhere.
Ocean Fertilisation. Adding nutrients to the ocean in selected locations to increase primary production which draws down carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.
Enhanced Weathering. Exposing large quantities of minerals that will react with carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and storing the resulting compound in the ocean or soil.
Ocean Alkalinity Enhancement. Grinding up, dispersing, and dissolving rocks such as limestone, silicates, or calcium hydroxide in the ocean to increase its ability to store carbon and directly ameliorate ocean acidification.

————-

About Us

The Oxford Geoengineering Programme was founded in 2010 as an initiative of the Oxford Martin School at the University of Oxford.

Geoengineering – the deliberate large-scale intervention in the Earth’s natural systems to counteract climate change – is a contentious subject and rightly so.

The Oxford Geoengineering Programme seeks to engage with society about the issues associated with geoengineering and conduct research into some of the proposed techniques. The programme does not advocate implementing geoengineering, but it does advocate conducting research into the social, ethical and technical aspects of geoengineering. This research must be conducted in a transparent and socially informed manner.

The University of Oxford is involved in three major projects on geoengineering funded by the UK Research Councils.

They are: The Integrated Assessment of Geoengineering Proposals (IAGP) in partnership with The University of Leeds, Cardiff University, Lancaster University, University of Bristol, University of East Anglia, The Tyndall Centre and the UK Met Office; Stratospheric Particle Injection for Climate Engineering (SPICE) in partnership with The University of Bristol and Cambridge University; and Climate Geoengineering Governance (CGG), a recently announced Oxford-led project in partnership with The University of Sussex and University College London which will examine the governance and ethics of geoengineering.

-SPICE-

Participants, Partners and Sponsors:

Source: http://www2.eng.cam.ac.uk/~hemh/SPICE/SPICE.htm

–=–

The SPICE project – Stratospheric Particle Injection for Climate Engineering

The SPICE project will investigate the effectiveness of Solar Radiation Management (SRM) using stratospheric particles. It addresses the three grand challenges in solar radiation management: 1. How much, of what, needs to be injected where into the atmosphere to effectively and safely manage the climate system? 2. How do we deliver it there? 3. What are the likely impacts? These questions are addressed through 3 coordinated and inter-linked work packages which are summarized here and described in detail in section 3.

CUED is responsible for the Delivery systems (WP2):

WP2 Particles are to be injected into the stratosphere at heights upwards of 10km (mid-latitude) and 18km (equatorial). A range of delivery systems have at various times been proposed including batch delivery by aircraft, balloons or ballistics and steady-state delivery by thermal plumes, or from a fixed tower or pipe supported by a balloon. The rate required for global climate modification is upward of 1Mte p.a. and at this rate the delivery costs for batch methods are estimated to be well above £1bn p.a. but an order of magnitude less than 1/10 of this for the pipe delivery method.

WP2.0: Before SPICE begins a process to evaluate alternative delivery systems will take place so that WP2 can begin its primary tasks without delay. Delivery systems identified so far include aircraft, weather balloons, ballistics, towers, tethered balloons or dirigibles and tethered jet engine platforms. For each the preliminary investigation will outline engineering, development, capital and operating costs and timescales, environmental and social impact…

Source: http://www2.eng.cam.ac.uk/~hemh/climate/Geoengineering_RoySoc.htm

University of Oxford also houses a mind-bending reference library of proposed Geo-Engineering methods and techniques that will make your head spin:

Link: http://www.geoengineering.ox.ac.uk/geolibrary/index/

–

–=–
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
–=–

–

About PAOC

PAOC oversees a broad program of education and research in atmospheric, oceanic, and climate sciences. We are engaged in some of the most intellectually challenging and important problems in science, such as the physics of hurricanes, and the dynamics of ice ages. PAOC is part of the Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences at MIT and includes members from other MIT departments and from Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution.

The phenomena under study involve a large array of scientific disciplines – geophysics, geochemistry, physical and chemical oceanography, meteorology, atmospheric chemistry, and planetary science. The program carries out research and gives instruction in all of these principal areas. Perhaps more than any other program in the world, PAOC offers its students unique opportunities for interdisciplinary study and research. In all areas we emphasize a combination of theoretical, observational and modeling approaches.

Students and researchers come from all over the world attracted not only by our programs but also the city of Cambridge and its environs which contain many institutions active in atmospheric and oceanographic research; Harvard University, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, and the Boston Office of the National Weather Service, as well as many private companies.

Contact with all of these institutions is maintained through seminars and symposia. Moreover students can formally take subjects at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution and Harvard University. The research and educational programs of PAOC also benefit from the larger intellectual milieu provided by MIT with its strengths in science and engineering. In research there are no departmental boundaries and we collaborate freely across discipline. PAOC is also involved in undergraduate education within the Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences.

To give you an example of the learning seminars and symposia mentioned, one of PAOC’s senior research scientists has some interesting lectures, which are broadcast to many colleges around the world. These type of video lectures are commonplace in Geo-Engineering courses.

Name – Chien Wang

Title – Senior Research Scientist

Education – Ph.D. in Atmospheric Sciences, 1992, State University of New York (Albany, New York)

Bio and Interests – Physics and Chemistry of Aerosols and Clouds • Tropospheric Chemistry • Aerosol-Climate and Chemistry-Climate Interactions

Dr. Wang’s recent researches include cloud dynamics and microphysics, interaction between cloud-scale and large-scale processes, aerosol-cloud-precipitaion connection, and atmospheric chemistry. He has developed a three-dimensional modeling system to simulate the dynamical, microphysical, and chemical processes of clouds, especially of deep convective clouds. He is also working on a global-scale chemistry and climate model and use this model to study the sensitivity of climate change to atmospheric chemical processes. Another research focus of Dr. Wang and his group is to understand the role of aerosols in climate system. He and his group have developed an interactive aerosol-climate model and used this model, aided by observational and retrieval data, to study the climate impacts of anthropogenic absorbing aerosols particularly on critical precipitation systems such as the monsoons. They are also trying to understand how aerosols emitted from biomass burning can affect regional and global climate.

Dr. Wang’s research interests include cloud dynamics and microphysics, interactions between cloud-scale and large-scale processes, and atmospheric chemistry. He has developed a three-dimensional modeling system to simulate the dynamical, microphysical, and chemical processes of clouds, especially of deep convective clouds. He is also working on a global-scale interactive chemistry and climate model and using this model to study the sensitivity of climate change to atmospheric chemical processes.

MIT also hosts the “Laboratory For Aviation And The Environment“, in association with Harvard University.

Link: http://lae.mit.edu/geoengineering-seminars/

And of course the Civil and environmental Engineering degree program is listed as follows, followed by a detailed listing of each course in the graduate program:

The mission of the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering (CEE) is to provide human services in a sustainable way, balancing society’s need for long-term infrastructure with environmental health. This positions CEE to play an essential role in solving some of the most pressing problems facing humanity, including concerns about energy and the environment.

Research domains

Research in CEE falls into six overlapping, cross-disciplinary focus areas:

Smarter Cities
Ecosystems
Coastal Zone
Water and Energy Resources
Chemicals in the Environment
Materials

Undergraduate Education

We offer two accredited majors, in civil engineering (1C) and in environmental engineering science (1E), as well as a flexible unaccredited program (1A). The core curriculum introduces principles of earth systems and sustainability, provides a grounding in the fundamentals of solid and fluid mechanics, and incorporates project-based labs that teach the processes and skills involved in planning, design and construction. The curriculum provides students with both a rigorous foundation in theory and the practical, hands-on experience they need to succeed in the field.

Graduate Education

At the graduate level, CEE runs two very successful professional engineering programs, the Master of Engineering and the interdepartmental Master of Science in Transportation. Both attract excellent applicants from leading U.S. and international universities. These programs provide a critical link between the department and companies and governmental agencies concerned with the environment, transportation and infrastructure. About one-third of our doctoral graduates go on to accept faculty positions, making our training of doctoral candidates in a wide range of research areas a point of pride. Our scholars regularly produce high-quality, impactful research and go on to shape the intellectual future of the field.

Source: http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/civil-and-environmental-engineering/index.htm

–

–=–
University of Michigan
–=–

–

In this amazing admission by Joyce of the University of Michigan, she lectures about the ALREADY GEO-ENGINEERED ATMOSPHERE and how it is already protecting us from global warming!!!

“For cloud seeding – we are already doing that. We have satellite images of ship-tracks available that tell us that in fact the emissions from the ships brighten the clouds in the little lines you see (chemtrails) and change the radius of the particles in the clouds. So we’re already doing that.”

“We also know that the aerosols that we are currently emitting are already protecting us from global warming to a certain extent

“We have already seeded marine clouds.”

Link to video: http://mit.tv/zNJgtx

James Fleming, from Colby College, lecture about his historical book “Fixing The Sky”:

Link to video: http://mit.tv/wNgvvM

The now infamous David Keith, also lecturing at MIT about “The Case For Geo-Engineering”:

Link to video: http://mit.tv/zSfNG8

Here David Keith is made to look the fool by Steven Colbert:

Link to video: http://thecolbertreport.cc.com/videos/lv0hd2/david-keith

David Battisti, from the University of Washington, at the MIT lecture hall:

Link to video: http://mit.tv/xEwMFn

Judy Layzer, from MIT, also lectures on making the choice to Geo-Engineer the planet and the politics of Geo-Engineering, stating that those against Geo-Engineering are irrational only after first stating that she “knows very little about Geo-Engeneering”:

Link to video: http://mit.tv/ybujGQ

Catherine Redgwell, University College London, is an attorney with the Royal Society of London, speaking of governance of Geo-Engineering:

Link to video: http://mit.tv/zQXYqE

And finally, all these speakers together:

“The sword is Geo-Engineering, and it’s what we’re going to do if you (population) don’t take your foot off the accelerator”.

Link to video: http://mit.tv/AmpnAV

–

–=–
Washington Geoengineering Consortium
–=–

–

The Washington Geoengineering Consortium is a collaboration between a set of academics from Johns Hopkins University and American University in Washington, DC. We are concerned with the social, political, and legal implications of geoengineering technologies. Our public outreach efforts are guided by the observation that, to date, the conversation about geoengineering’s development, deployment, and implications has been confined to a relatively narrow set of voices. Our goal is to generate space for perspectives from civil society actors and the wider public, to produce a heightened level of engagement around issues of justice, agency, and inclusion.

In a recent closed-door meeting, we learn that the true nature of Non-Governmental Organizations is to “act” like concerned citizens and then to convince real citizens on how to buy Geo-Engineering. In other words, NGO’s act as the voice of the public while selling the product of Geo-Engineering to the public as its voice:

Civil Society Meeting Report

On November 4, 2013, the Washington Geoengineering Consortium organized a meeting for civil society actors based in Washington DC.

The meeting brought together around 40 people from major environmental, development, and justice NGOs, to consider the challenges and opportunities presented by geoengineering technologies. There was much rich conversation throughout the day…

Executive Summary

On November 4, 2013, the WGC hosted a closed-door meeting on geoengineering for Washington, DC-based civil society actors. More than 40 individuals registered to attend, from 30 different organizations…

During the first breakout session, participants were invited to look at the potential benefits and risks for people and the climate of various geoengineering proposals, and began to consider the possible contours of civil society engagement. The second session focused more particularly on questions of ethics, justice, governance, and of framing.

Risks and Benefits of Civil Society Engagement

Many argued that the present reluctance of civil society actors to engage with the geoengineering conversation must be overcome. If the world gets to the point of having to choose between climate disaster or geoengineering, politicians are almost certain, it was suggested, to choose geoengineering. This understanding of the political dynamics driving the world toward deployment of geoengineering technologies suggests a need for urgent and more far-reaching civil society attention.

How Should Civil Society Actors Frame Geoengineering?

Some suggested that the dominant framing for geoengineering now is as a “solution” to climate change. Few scientists would make such a claim, but the general public may still construe the promise of geoengineering as “this will make climate change go away and, so, we don’t have to change our behaviors.” A few suggested that, to shift the conversation in productive ways, geoengineering should be characterized publicly as a “terrible choice.” Geoengineering, in other words, can be viewed by civil society organizations as a strategic opening, as a way to bring home the horrors of climate change to policymakers and the public.

Perhaps the slimiest of all careers in the field of Geo-Engineering, the political selling of Agenda 21/Sustainable Development through the perceived threat of a global catastrophe takes the cake. Non-Governmental Organizations (NGO) are charged with impersonating the will and concern of the public, literally acting as socially responsible representatives of the public while in reality just posing as salesmen and propagandists for the Agenda 21 and environmental engineering industrial complex. These actors are the backbone of corporate and government propaganda delivery to the dumbed-down masses – a false-consensus gathering machine of no equal, that nullifies the voice of the actual public and voters. Here we see that though few scientists would make the claim that Geo-Engineering is an actual solution to the problem, the job of the NGO is to act as if the opposite is true by pitching and selling the lie if that’s what the consortium concludes is needed, or to spin the oposite theory as a threat to force people to accept Agenda 21/Sustainable and smart growth lifestyles. This is called “framing” the propaganda.

–=–
Conclusion
–=–

I’m not sure what else needs to be said here. I’m not sure how any sane and rational person can possibly still consider Geo-Engineering merely a theory or that the photos of persistent contrails utilized by the above university professors to illustrate Geo-Engineering practices can be anything else but “chemtrails” used for research in atmospheric research, as they themselves claim.

But then again… I wouldn’t hold my breath.

The interconnectedness of Agenda 21 and the supposed climate change is becoming obvious, and this external threat of climate seems to be yet another false flag creation of think-tanks that is being utilized to scare the population of earth into excepting Agenda 21 in totality in order to avert and avoid the supposed “global catastrophe” concluded by the elite nerd class.

It should also be very concerning to the reader that the university system around the globe is being utilized as the main venue for the justification and funding of Geo-Engineering and Sustainable Development. This poisoning of our young minds will directly effect your future and that of your future generations unless this madness is nipped in the butt and the influence of corporate, governmental, and non-governmental organizations is removed from school curriculum and funding.

This field extends to every facet of environmental and geological tracking and engineering. One should no longer limit their purview of Geo-Engineering as just lines in the sky that spread out to form “urban haze”. It requires a massive network of everything from annalists and engineers to secretaries and computer input specialists, and involves land, sea, air, social society, and even space.

Whether Geo-Engineering is a scare-tactic or a truly necessary tool to save the planet, I have to conclude that by their own comments and admissions of not knowing whether or not this thing will even work or whether it will itself kill all life on the planet and rip a hole in the ozone, I can safely say that you who are reading this should likely be of the opinion by now that this bunch of assholes listed above should not be given the controls to the atmosphere, climate, and natural ecosystem of planet Earth.

For God’s sake and for that of your children, we must not let this revenge of the nerds continue to take place.

Government will not protect you, because it loves the idea, and is inhabited by the same nerds!

Fight this with your life, for that is all you have left.

All life on Earth is literally in the balance…

–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Sunday, May 11th, 2014

44 Comments

by realitybloger on May 11, 2014 • Permalink

Posted in Chemtrails and cloud seeding, Geo-engineering, Globalism

Posted by realitybloger on May 11, 2014

https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2014/05/11/degrees-in-geo-engineering-and-sustainable-development/

The Only Way We Can Stop Geoengineering

My name is Clint Richardson and I am writing to you, the good people of America, because now more than ever we need each others help. I don’t want your money, only your time and a little bit of effort on your own behalf…

Intent is the foundation of a proper response and action against any problem. At the moment, most of the small percent of an otherwise uninformed population of this world that actually knows about Geo-engineering as a weather modification and control scheme inversely has no idea how to fight such an esoteric and out of reach event (despite their determined intent) – like a bunch of electricians without tools for the job. We feel helpless against it; watching from miles below as the sky becomes dim and while record-breaking temperatures scorch and freeze parts of the Earth that have never known such dramatic variations in temperature. While it is clear that our mutual intent is to stop these psychopathic efforts to alter our climate in any way they can, as we look around for the “solution” to this deleterious alteration of our environment we collectively come up short. Our intent is as a dandelion in the wind; blown in all different directions and so completely unorganized that even millions of people with the same goal cannot make even the slightest dent as a resistance, spreading more and more weeds of confusion and the disappointment of knowledge without remedy.

We beg our supposedly representative legislature to disallow such unprecedented spraying of our skies but are shrugged off with lies and the denial of the very existence of this phenomenon by the very congress and local officials who legally regulate it. And we walk away disappointed and enraged… complaining to our mutual in-activists in the virtual world of “social media” where it makes no difference in the real world – right where these megalomaniacs want us to be.

We congregate in this artificial world of web forums and sites for mutually sympathetic support, ineffectually complaining to each other while in the real world the alteration and poisoning of the entire ecosystem of planet Earth and indeed our now mineral-compounded and poisoned bodies continues without a physical real-world response from the people being poisoned.

And all of this perfectly legal!

We keep repeating to ourselves and our brethren that “knowledge is power”; that we must tell as many people as we can and that this informational exchange will somehow make a difference by “waking up” the sleeping masses. And yet, we offer these masses no answers to their predictable questions of what the hell to do about it. How can we share a problem if we don’t know the solution? What’s the point?

In typically ironic group-think fashion, the one thing that would actually stop this ever-increasing threat of extinction level Terra-formation of our environment seems to go completely under the radar of even the most ardent of activists – the fact that all of us individually are each entirely responsible for this weather modification without even knowing it. This is simply because we continue to act, vent, protest, and petition in the artificial construct of the internet (The Matrix, if you will) instead of making demands by taking individual legal action – the only action that government understands or is required to act upon.

You see, government acts solely upon the legal consent of the people to its actions. And since silence is considered a form of passive consent, the chemical spraying of the skies moves onward and upward without any legal challenge whatsoever. The fact is that no one is properly making a legal claim against what is happening. And unfortunately this is what government loves – total consent of the people through their ignorance of law and legal silence.

‘But wait just a darn minute there pal…’

You say…

‘I am screaming from the top of my lungs and complaining in web forums and writing pleading personal letters and emails to my congressmen to pretty-pretty please stop allowing this Geo-engineering to happen!!! How can you dare say I am just letting it happen by being silent?’

And therein lies the very legal silence of which I speak…

The truth is that in the legal realm and language of government, the conversational English language spoken by the average man or woman means absolutely nothing. Even the most abjectly voluminous of activists goes unheard by legal governmental ears simply because the activist is speaking a foreign language to government in their efforts of activism. The legal language is not synonymous with the English language, and so you might as well be speaking Chinese. Government responds to legal notices and demands, not to uninformed questions and begging. Government operates via the legal consent of the people under its own written legal codes, and so the fact that the people never speak in the legal language of government equates to the absolute silence of the people in this fictional (legal) realm. We are like a bunch of parrots squawking nonsensically at a bunch of wolfs and rats in fancy suits. A parrot squawks. A wolf barks. So no matter how many letters, emails, requests, nasty-grams, personal confrontations caught on film, or any other form of communications that we the people submit to government, the government is in no way liable or responsible to respond or acknowledge any of our efforts… That is – unless we use the correct language.

Now, let’s get back to our collective yet fractured intent to stop the alteration of our weather and environment and discuss how we can mutually focus it all into a positive action (note that the word “action” is a legal term).

It is my personal intention to place a legal moratorium on all “weather modification” taking place in the State of Utah currently and in the foreseeable future – with the ultimate intent for all States and indeed nations to create the same legal bailiwick. But I cannot do it alone.

After many years of study, I have come to one inevitable conclusion: Weather Modification and Geo-engineering is only able to be done with the legal informed consent of the people, whether they know it or not!

You see, much of what government does on the State or National (federal) level is based on the presumed consent (permission) of all the people to all of its actions (as one group with one vote instead of individuals with independent voices). This is the true conundrum of a “representative” government that relies on the ignorance of the people to its methods of madness and corruption; manufacturing the uncompromisable consent of all people as citizens (voters). Government has become so clever and creative about what has been coined “manufacturing consent” that for the most part, government is now acting in most areas completely outside of the realm of public (the people’s) knowledge or permission, based on this fairytale world of the ignorant consent of the masses without any form of voter approval or even voter comprehension.

And the people wonder why and how “they” get away with it…

Government calls this “informed consent” – all based on the presumption that the consent of the people is given to government’s actions simply because no individuals within the group of represented people have personally withdrawn their consent.

Government has become addicted to this type of manufactured, and thus “presumed” consent only because the major bulk of the people have no idea that their consent is being presumed or is even needed in the first place. But in truth, government cannot use the excuse of acting on the behalf of the people without that very legal informed consent. And so it has mastered the science of openly secret operations that are right in front of the people’s noses – yet completely out of sight and mind – while being perfectly legal and based upon the uncomprehending public consent of the people as citizens in a “body politic”.

Most important to understand here, is that the art of creating the unwitting group “consent of the people” only really requires one little thing – a public notice.

There is but one thing that a public notice creates, and that thing is informed consent. By silence in the form of a lack legal challenges to these government public legal notices, a legal vacuum of non-resistance ultimately is the ultimate result; creating a permissive legal contract between the people and government where the people allow and offer informed consent for what ever that particular public legal notice substantiates within its legal authority.

This is how public roads and real estate built with taxpayer money get sold off to private corporations and become toll roads. The people don’t respond to the notice of intent, thus agreeing to the action of sale or lease.

This is how taxpayers fund private ventures like parking garages and meters which enter later into lease agreements with private bank and corporations, where “infrastructure privatization” allows the banks to keep the fees in 50-year contracts with government that are paid by the taxpayers who built the garages.

This is how back-door deals and outrageous real estate projects are done within the political public realm; funded through taxpayer monies yet never benefiting even one taxpayer, agreed to and voted on in councils without voter approval.

And perhaps you’ve wondered why pharmaceutical companies put 60-90 second infomercials on television telling you as a happy bouncy purple ball or pleasant family scene draws your attention away from what is being disclosed within – stating the side-effects of complete misery and death with that particular pharmaceutical drug? Well folks, this is part 1 of a 2-tiered public notice legal procedure, which directs you in small print 3/4rths of the way through the info-commercial to a much more detailed and legal official printed public notice in some popular magazine or journal publication like Redbook, Health, or Golf Digest. This is a legal public notice of these drugs horrific possible side-effects, creating a legally binding corporate protection from any of these listed side-effects by legal government codes. You were given public notice… so if you take that drug you have limited legal recourse as government statute protect the corporations.

Did you think they did these strange admissions of side-effects for fun? Of course not. This is public disclosure through official legal notice to the public. And government is the main institutional shareholder in all major pharmaceutical companies, so protecting those investments and guaranteeing returns means limiting the legal actions of the people. This public notice process for drug companies was created by government for their protection. The people don’t even know this is happening, and then wonder why when a vaccine destroys theirs or their children’s health, they are forced to go to a special “vaccine court” set up specifically for vaccine injury by government-protected pharmaceutical companies instead of a regular lawful court. The courts protect the corporations and the government who created them, not the people.

All of these actions by government first require public notice and informed consent of the public before they are considered “legal”. And the lack of legal response by any individuals in the group (body politic) continuously creates an open back door where these types of unethical deals, corporate partnerships (PPP) and legal protections happen on a daily basis.

And the people complain and whine… but only do so in their social media/digital worlds – never in the legal realm where it would actually count and where government actually exists – in the artificial world of legal codes.

And without this realization, the most prominent questions out there amongst the people is always the same:

“Our representatives wont listen or even acknowledge that weather modification is happening, so what can we do about it? What is the solution?”

This is the question that ironically is being asked by the very base and foundation of power in government – the people. Without the people and their collective consent, none of this would be happening in the first place. And within this all-too-common conversational question lies the ironically simple legal answer…

It is not that we are asking the wrong question, it is just that we don’t know the legal meaning of the words we use!

And this void of meaning takes all power away from the people.

Here is the most important legal definition you will ever comprehend, for the understanding of this legal concept is the entire basis of corruption and servitude of the people to this rogue government. All you need to know is what you are actually asking… and how to ask the correct question in the correct language.

And so the question should not be ‘what is the solution?’

The question should be ‘what is the legal definition of the word solution?’

SOLUTION, civil law. Payment. 2. By this term, is understood, every species of discharge or liberation, which is called satisfaction, and with which the creditor is satisfied. This term has rather a reference to the substance of the obligation, than to the numeration or counting of the money. Vide Discharge of a contract. –Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856, (A Law Dictionary, Adapted to the Constitution and Laws of the United States. By John Bouvier. Published 1856.)

SOLUTION – Law. Payment or satisfaction of a claim or debt. –American Heritage Dictionary, 4th ed, 2000

SOLUTION – Law. The payment, discharge, or satisfaction of a claim, debt, etc. –Collins English Dictionary, 10th ed, 2009

SOLUTIO – Roman Civil Law. Performance of an obligation: payment, discharge, release. –Merriam-Webster online

The Declaration of Independence – so cherished by the people – declares well the way in which consent was to be not only needed but required by government to act on those same people’s behalf:

“…Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”

And herein lies the answer to our question – What is our legal solution?

It is our mutual consent as the people who are indeed voluntarily governed is what gives the power to government to act upon its own laws – the laws created by the representatives of the consenting people (acting on behalf of the people). And this presumed and unchallenged consent creates not only a contractual claim of government to perform Geo-engineering, but also an obligation to uphold the legal act of Geo-engineering by law. The government is performing its obligation by regulating every jet that flies by and sprays our sky. And with the people’s consent, government claims the right to do this, and gives legal permission for private corporations and military to Geo-engineer the world.

The solution, therefore, is to challenge this legal claim granted by government to itself on behalf of the informed people by withdrawing consent of the contract that allows it – the U.S. CODE and other statutes. Removing consent of all people removes the power of government to act on behalf of all people. Since the individual people do not vote and are not given opportunity to vote for this action taken by government, the government cannot claim the right to do such action lawfully by vote of the people. This is the importance of having corrupt representatives vote in lieu of the actual people. In the case of Geo-engineering, government is acting as a rogue agency without voter approval – but with informed consent of the voters (people). Do you understand the difference?

And because of this, the people must individually be the solution by satisfying the contract (statute) that gives this authority to government. We must individually withdraw consent, thus voiding the substance of the obligation. We must discharge the right of government to alter our weather by severing the one thing that gives such contract power – our individually assumed consent.

Knowing that our mutual silence of presumed consent to the public notice creates a contract of permissive actions by government on behalf of the people who consent to those actions, we can see why these actions and notices are never legally challenged but only conversationally complained about outside the legal realm of government. Holding up a sign, posting a comment on a website, or listening to a radio show is not a legal challenge. Therefore, the weather modification continues at an unprecedented rate.

Government is doing nothing but preforming its obligation of law by allowing and regulating areal spraying within a State or nationally. The people consent to that law by not stating or responding to public notice of intent in a legal demand that their non-consent is not granted. In other words, government is just following its own law and doing nothing illegal. Government has offered a chance to the people for rebuttal of that law (remedy), and the people have chosen not to take that opportunity (through their ignorance of governments legal functionality) by the simple act of inaction (silence is consent). Government is doing nothing more than satisfying an obligation of law (contract) by participating in Geo-engineering. And since government is nothing but a representative body of the people under it, weather modification is a contractually substantive legal requirement.

It’s all legal because the people don’t legally challenge the law.

A logical person would generally speculate that with just a simple look up, this should be enough to make people and even our corrupt politicians question ‘what has become of our once beautiful blue sky?’ With a now reported 20% “global dimming” – the atmospheric obstruction of the ability of the sun’s rays to reach the surface of Earth, I think it is finally time for the people acknowledge and break free of their group mentality, and to individually stand up and say “No, I do not consent!”

This is not something a group can do with one legal paper or within a “class-action lawsuit”, but is instead something that must be done by many individuals independent of each other and yet with uniformity. The government would like nothing more than for the resistance movement against any tyranny of government to continue as it is – with people joining groups while ignoring the power of their own self. Legally speaking, a group with one lawsuit is far less powerful and easier to control than many individuals standing up for their individual rights individually. The people must be organized without allowing an organization to act for them (like government does) on their behalf. The people must be organized without joining an organization! And so the people must act with individual voices.

I am but one man, and the unified voice of many individuals is needed.

So here is my lofty plan…

–=–
You Are A Conspiracy
–=–

First and foremost, we must stop using or acknowledging this word conspiracy. And we must find a way to subvert the ridiculous criticism that follows this word by simply defining it in a rational way so as to make its use pointless and fallacious.

This is actually way more easy than you might think.

You see, everything man-made is in fact a conspiracy!

When you were born, your mother and father participated in a plan to copulate for the purposes of reproduction. You were the end result, even if your birth was accidental. You were a plan of action between two people – the very definition of the word conspiracy.

Do you have a vegetable garden? Well then you have participated in a conspiracy to grow food with the providers of the seeds that you planted and gave money to in exchange for them, the fertilizer you used, and the city water supply you irrigated with – meaning that the government water utility was also in on the conspiracy to grow your garden.

Your home was built through a conspiratorial effort between laborers, plumbers, roofers, electricians, architects, city planners, and the bank or government bond that funded its building, amongst many others.

There is not one thing on this planet made by man that was not created out of conspiracy!

For a conspiracy is nothing but a plan, usually between two or more people.

Every legislation or action taken by the government is a conspiracy between councilmen, congressmen and the President, indirectly consented to by all the people in one massive debacle of a conspiracy. The only reason that most of these things are not considered a criminal conspiracy is that government itself says in its own laws what is criminal and legal by that same conspiratorial legislation consented to by the people (whether they know they are part of the conspiracy or not). The law-makers decide what is legal, thus the law is virtually lawless in government, as we will shortly prove.

If everything is a conspiracy than nothing is.

Don’t let this ridiculous word effect your intent and drive to end this waking nightmare of Geo-engineering. This word literally means nothing, especially as a fallacious insult or ad hominem attack.

If this was not true, I’d have quit a long time ago.

Moving on…

–≈–
The Public Notice
–≈–

Remember, the first step towards the implementation any governmental action or plan (conspiracy) is to create what is called a public notice, usually entered into the public record in the form of a newspaper “public legal notice”. This oh- so important step in the process of manufacturing consent is without a doubt the largest piece of the puzzle for the government’s gaining of informed consent by the people for its draconian actions. By placing a public notice into a series of newspapers and other “public” outlets, government can afterwords state that the public was given “informed consent” about government’s future actions and intent, including public hearings on these actions, since these published newspaper public notices are legally considered a full public disclosure.

There’s only problem… seldom do average, everyday people casually read the public notice section of their local newspaper – if they even read the paper at all. And this fact is quite well-known to government.

For our purposes, I will be mostly referring to the State of Utah where I live for the presentment of how the people of Utah are tricked each year into consenting to Geo-engineering. But this method of informed consent is methodically uniform in all States, Federally, and internationally. For the public notice is indeed the oldest modern form of public disclosure.

Here’s how that works…

In September of 2012, the following public “NOTICE OF INTENT” was placed into the Salt Lake Tribune (Salt Lake County area) as well as many other “local” newspapers across the state of Utah. Of course, the taxpayers ironically fund these government notices with their forced taxation.

NOTICE OF INTENT – WEATHER MODIFICATION

North American Weather Consultants, 8180 South Highland Dr., Suite B-2, Sandy, Utah 84093, a contractor licensed by the Utah Division of Water Resources, intends to conduct weather modification programs in Utah to increase precipitation with the following potential sponsors: Utah Water Resources Development Corporation (representing Beaver, Emery, Garfield, Iron, Juab, Millard, Piute, Sanpete, Sevier, Tooele, Washington and Wayne Counties), Box Elder and Cache Counties, the Bear River Water Conservancy District, Provo River Water Users Association, Weber Basin Water Conservancy District, Duchesne County Water Conservancy District, Uintah Water Conservancy District, Central Utah Water Conservancy District and Alta and Snowbird ski areas. The areas in which the effects are intended to occur are in the mountainous portions of Washington, eastern Iron, eastern Beaver, eastern Millard, eastern Juab, eastern Tooele, eastern Utah, eastern Salt Lake, eastern Davis, eastern Weber, Morgan, Box Elder, Cache, western Rich, Summit, northern Duchesne, northern Uintah, southern Daggett, Wasatch, western Carbon, Sanpete, western Emery, Sevier, Piute, western Wayne, western Garfield, northwest Kane, San Juan, and southern Grand Counties. The operations may be conducted during portions of the period from October 15, 2012 to May 31, 2013. Weather modification operations will be conducted using ground based, silver iodide nuclei generators. Limited aircraft seeding may be conducted for research purposes.

Persons interested in this permit application should contact the Utah Division of Water Resources: 1594 West North Temple, P.O. Box 146201, Salt Lake City, Utah 84114, telephone (801) 707-8820.

NORTH AMERICAN WEATHER CONSULTANTS
Don A. Griffith, CCM President
8180 South Highland Dr., Suite B-2 Sandy, Utah 84093

(Source–> http://utahlegals.com/notice.php?id=159078)

Another legal public notice states:

NOTICE OF INTENT – WEATHER MODIFICATION

Emery Water Conservancy District, P.O. Box 998, Castle Dale, Utah 84513 intends to conduct weather modification programs in Utah to increase precipitation. The area in which the effects are intended to occur are in the higher elevation snowpack accumulation regions in portions of Eastern Sanpete and Western Carbon and Emery Counties. The operations may be conducted during portions of the period from December 1, 2011 to April 15, 2012. Weather modification operations will be conducted using automated liquid propane dispensers.

Persons interested in this permit application should contact the Utah Division of Water Resources; 1594 West North Temple, Box 146201, Salt Lake City, UT 84114-6201, telephone (801)538-7269.

Emery Water Conservancy District
Jay Mark Humphrey, Manager
P.O. Box 998
Castle Dale, UT 84513

Published in the Emery County Progress September 13, 20 and 27, 2011.

(Source–> http://www.utahlegals.com/notice.php?id=119946)

And though it is too late to stop either of these, here is the Public Notice and NOTICE OF INTENT of WEATHER MODIFICATION for the winter of 2010-2011: Link–> http://utahlegals.com/notice.php?id=60319

–=–

The debate over weather modification (Geo-engineering) being a real and provable event is certainly over. It is an obvious forgone conclusion backed by the laws of the United States and the United Nations that the lines in the sky are purposefully man-made, and that these are specifically used for “weather modification”.

This industry is actually well regulated and quite organized, as we will see…

–=–
But They Are Just Making Snow, Right?
–=–

Anyone who has been skiing before has probably seen or heard about the creation of fake snow through ground-based weather modification devices such as the ones mentioned above. Indeed, they have been in operation for many decades at ski resorts across the world. Ironically, most people don’t give this fact a second thought, even when stating their contradictory disbelief in “chemtrails”, “Geo-engineering”, and “weather modification”. And unfortunately, most people believe this endeavor to be a harmless and innocent modification to the natural ecosystem – as if there is such a thing.

In declaring this “Notice of Intent”, the government has done a very sneaky thing. They have declared their intent to do experimental research via weather modification (Geo-engineering) in the same paragraph as the modifications done for ski resorts and farming belts. Thus, the reader might dismiss this intent as one of saving crops or creating snow for tourism for the benefit of the citizenry and farmers.

But I assure you, “research purposes” is a very dangerous, obtuse, and mufti-faceted description of many dangerous, untested, and unnecessary Geo-engineering projects conducted world-wide. These types of obscure open-ended statements allow almost anything to happen in government. And the act of placing this into an otherwise harmless seeming Public Notice is the root of our hazy, polluted, and dimmed skies…

And so, for the purposes and intent of my campaign, we now know the intent of government through its own legal notice to the public – which is to conduct research on the weather through the experimental modification and engineering of the atmosphere and to create legal modification of the weather for certain unnamed “research” purposes.

To this, I do not consent!!!

But how do I tell this to government so that it will actually be forced to consider my non-consent???

For this, I must have a legal solution…

But first, I must understand where the statutes (laws) come from that make all of this legal on a national and international level.

–≈–
The Laws Of Weather Modification
–≈–

Before we can move forward with this plan of action to stop Utah’s government from modifying the weather of the State for “research purposes” and allowing the Federal government from doing the same, we need to obtain the statutes (legal codes) that accompany the process of this weather modification process. Since I am in the State of Utah, I will be focusing on this State. However, no matter what State you live in, the Codes will likely be uniform in their legal language if not exact, and it is fact that the same manufactured consent is being conducted in your own areas, for many different purposes – including weather modification.

You will soon be getting a public notice of your own in your local newspaper.

Will you consent?

Let’s take a look at what public laws (statutes) regulate weather modification?

Since areal spraying is a cross-border effort miles high in the atmosphere on a national and world-wide front, let’s first go to the Federal (national) level so that we can understand the true nature of this thing we call government, and how it justifies this weather modification scheme. Please understand that the following US CODE is the law, and it allows government to justify unimaginable things to the human, animal, and plant kingdom – as well as to completely alter the environment at its whim and with total disregard for the people or any other life-form on the planet. It is from this Federal law that States are justified in allowing Geo-engineering and other biological weapons testing to take place amongst all the “citizenry” with their unknown and yet voluntary informed consent.

Firstly, the Federal Government must define what Weather Modification is within its legal codes. It does so in TITLE 15: COMMERCE AND TRADE:

15 USC § 330 – Definitions

As used in this chapter—

(1) The term “Secretary” means the Secretary of Commerce.

(2) The term “person” means any individual, corporation, company, association, firm, partnership, society, joint stock company, any State or local government or any agency thereof, or any other organization, whether commercial or nonprofit, who is performing weather modification activities, except where acting solely as an employee, agent, or independent contractor of the Federal Government.

(3) The term “weather modification” means any activity performed with the intention of producing artificial changes in the composition, behavior, or dynamics of the atmosphere.

(4) The term “United States” includes the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and any territory or insular possession of the United States.

Now that the government has clearly defined what “weather modification” is within its codes, we can safely search for other legal codes that regulate this process.

The above definition was taken from 15 USC Chapter 9A, entitled: “WEATHER MODIFICATION ACTIVITIES OR ATTEMPTS; REPORTING REQUIREMENT”.

Section 330e of this CODE also states:

15 USC § 330e – Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated $150,000 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1972, $200,000 each for the fiscal years 1973 through 1980, $100,000 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1981, $100,000 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1986, $100,000 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1987, $100,000 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1988, to carry out the provisions of this chapter.

Obviously, this phenomenon of weather modification has been established for many decades according to the appropriations granted within this section of US CODE. And if you didn’t pick it up, this represents the full and unadulterated knowledge, vote, and consent of Congress to the funding of weather modification, both financially and with purposeful intent to allow it by its own created US CODE.

But this goes far beyond just implicit knowledge of these weather modifications by congress, for the act of weather modification is actually required to be reported to government!

15 USC § 330a – Report requirement; form; information; time of submission

No person may engage, or attempt to engage, in any weather modification activity in the United States unless he submits to the Secretary such reports with respect thereto, in such form and containing such information, as the Secretary may by rule prescribe. The Secretary may require that such reports be submitted to him before, during, and after any such activity or attempt.

Remember, though the Secretary refers to the Secretary of Commerce as defined above, this is the US CODE created by congress. Don’t let the different departments fool you into thinking that congress is not complicit in all things in “conspiracy” with the President and all of the Executive activities and Cabinets. The greatest con-job on the American people is the illusion of competition and separation between government branches. Don’t fall for it. Government is one giant corporation, with many sub-corporate structures that are all part of the whole. Independence of such entities as the Federal Reserve is a fallacy – for natural independence does not exist in government, only political independence. No government entity is above the law. However, some are allowed by Congress to make their own rules. But rules never carry more weight than laws, and independent agencies of government are never actually outside of the incorporated structure of government.

You just have to realize that government itself makes its own laws, and creates the ways in which it is exempt from those self-induced laws. It does this through what I call “exception clauses”.

Very tricky. Here, let me show you…

Remember that the following are the codes (“laws”) created by congress to control the Department of Defense, and are not created by the DOD itself.

TITLE 50 of US CODE is entitled the “WAR AND NATIONAL DEFENSE”, and CHAPTER 32 is entitled “CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WARFARE PROGRAM”. This TITLE applies to both foreign and domestic use of the following:

50 USC § 1520a – Restrictions on use of human subjects for testing of chemical or biological agents

(a) Prohibited activities

The Secretary of Defense may not conduct (directly or by contract)—

(1) any test or experiment involving the use of a chemical agent or biological agent on a civilian population; or

(2) any other testing of a chemical agent or biological agent on human subjects.

(b) Exceptions

Subject to subsections (c), (d), and (e) of this section, the prohibition in subsection (a) of this section does not apply to a test or experiment carried out for any of the following purposes:

(1) Any peaceful purpose that is related to a medical, therapeutic, pharmaceutical, agricultural, industrial, or research activity.

(2) Any purpose that is directly related to protection against toxic chemicals or biological weapons and agents.

(3) Any law enforcement purpose, including any purpose related to riot control.

The Secretary of Defense may conduct a test or experiment described in subsection (b) of this section only if informed consent to the testing was obtained from each human subject in advance of the testing on that subject.

(d) Prior notice to Congress

Not later than 30 days after the date of final approval within the Department of Defense of plans for any experiment or study to be conducted by the Department of Defense (whether directly or under contract) involving the use of human subjects for the testing of a chemical agent or a biological agent, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a report setting forth a full accounting of those plans, and the experiment or study may then be conducted only after the end of the 30-day period beginning on the date such report is received by those committees.

(e) “Biological agent” defined

In this section, the term “biological agent” means any micro-organism (including bacteria, viruses, fungi, rickettsiac, or protozoa), pathogen, or infectious substance, and any naturally occurring, bioengineered, or synthesized component of any such micro-organism, pathogen, or infectious substance, whatever its origin or method of production, that is capable of causing—

(1) death, disease, or other biological malfunction in a human, an animal, a plant, or another living organism;

(2) deterioration of food, water, equipment, supplies, or materials of any kind; or

(3) deleterious alteration of the environment.

Please note that paragraph (B) of this section is of the utmost importance to comprehend. In government, most of the laws it creates and codifies within the US CODE have this type of “exception” clause, giving the illusion of just law. Generally speaking, this type of legal language creates in the same writing of legal code both a law and an exemption from that same law. Here we see that for the “peaceful purposes of medical, therapeutic, pharmaceutical, agricultural, industrial, or research activity” listed, Section (B) of this code is nullified by the exception and allows government to literally do everything bad in this CODE – including death and altering the environment. Therefore, Section (A) and everything listed as prohibited within this CODE is actually legal and permissible by government and its contractors (private corporations and foreign governments). Therefore, in truth and in law, we can virtually ignore the term “Prohibited Activities” in Section (A) of this CODE since government is completely immune from it as listed in Section (B). This CODE specifically states that “any test or experiment involving the use of a chemical agent or biological agent on a civilian population; or… any other testing of a chemical agent or biological agent on human subjects” is perfectly legal and acceptable under the law since government and its private contractors are totally immune to this law in this CODE.

Thus… THE LAW IS LAWLESS!!!

And within this description, can anyone tell me what in the world is not considered to be a “peaceful purpose” while falling under the category of either “medical, therapeutic, pharmaceutical, agricultural, industrial, or research activity“?

Weather modification is certainly used agriculturally and is defined above as a “research activity” in our Utah Public Notice. What in this world could not be considered “research”? In short, this list of “purposes” truly places total impunity and freedom for government to utilize chemical biological agents on the people of the Untied States under “peace time” conditions.

Again, these restrictions are restriction-less!

In Section (E) we see that the definition of these perfectly legal biological agents that can be used on any and all humans and upon all of lifeforms of Earth are defined as being wholeheartedly a “deleterious alteration of the environment” that can cause “death, disease, or other biological malfunction in a human, an animal, a plant, or another living organism…“

But perhaps the most important line item within these legal permissions is within Section (C) – the requirement of informed consent of the very people being sprayed with biological agents!!!

Did you know that you consent to be tested upon, America? That is all 315,498,000 million of you?

You see, the only way for government to have this type of power is of course with the consent of the people. Therefore, informed consent is a requirement for this or any other U.S. CODE to be just, and requires the voluntary consent of an informed public (victims). Of course the people certainly never were given a ballot to vote for and approve biological testing upon themselves!

But that doesn’t matter. The people’s vote is irrelevant if their consent can be manufactured.

In other words, the multiple biological weapons tests that have taken place both in the United States and abroad have all been allowed by a the very people those biological weapons have been tested upon – you, the people (group). Your consent through legal silence has been manufactured in this way, leaving a confused and angry American people completely ignorant of their own agreement as to the contractual nature of this “deleterious alteration” of their very own environment.

But we don’t stop there…

50 USC § 1519 – Lethal binary chemical munitions

(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this or any other Act shall be used for the purpose of production of lethal binary chemical munitions unless the President certifies to Congress that the production of such munitions is essential to the national interest and submits a full report thereon to the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives as far in advance of the production of such munitions as is practicable.

(b) For purposes of this section the term “lethal binary chemical munitions” means:

(1) any toxic chemical (solid, liquid, or gas) which, through its chemical properties, is intended to be used to produce injury or death to human beings, and

(2) any unique device, instrument, apparatus, or contrivance, including any components or accessories thereof, intended to be used to disperse or otherwise disseminate any such toxic chemical.

Again, we see a prohibition of some act followed by an “exception clause” that allows that prohibited by law act to be conducted – the word “unless”. If a report is filed to Congress in advance of the killing or injury, then its all just perfectly fine.

Truly, the law is lawless in the halls of government.

In this case, we must consider something else here that is very important to comprehend. The word “intended” has a very specific meaning that creates a purposeful act of harm by government against the people, which is why this code is labeled as “Biological Weapons“. With this disposition, where the lawful intention is to actually do harm to the populace (humans), is it even conceivable to postulate that any accidental harm or collateral damage being done to the human, animal, and plant kingdom or environmental has any relevance, remorse, or legal recourse whatsoever? In other words, if purposeful destruction of life and environment is OK in the law, what in God’s name would make you think that accidental destruction of life and the environment would not be OK in government’s eyes? Do you really think that if purposeful murder is exempted from law that accidental murder is not?

Here we see that the “dispersal or other dissemination” of “any toxic chemical (solid, liquid, or gas)” that will “produce injury or death to human beings” is perfectly justified by US CODE, as long as the exception clause is met by government to file a report on the record of such proceedings – which is once again to be considered informed consent of the people, since the representatives are the voice of the people.

And so I ask you, my fellow activists… Do you really expect your politicians to answer your angry letters when they are the very people who created such dastardly laws? Your death is a reasonable and legal consequence of “research activities” folks, and Geo-engineering is done by your “informed consent” as written within this code. In other words, you consent to your own victim-hood should you or your children, your pets, livestock, crops, or anything else in this world be harmed or killed by weather modifications as research activities and for agricultural purposes.

You see, the congress is the people, representing us all regardless of how or even if we voted. As representatives of the people of the States, congress is accepting this “certification” for the use of biological weapons and this is considered “informed consent” to and of the people through our “representatives”. For our purposes, we may as well just accept the fact that as long as the subjects (citizens; we) are not acting on our own individual behalf and instead consenting to having representatives as their voice of consent, then again the only “people” within the United States that have a voice are really the congress men and women themselves.

This is why democracy as majority rule through representatives is perhaps more nightmarish scenario than any dictatorship imaginable. The illusion of choice is so much more devious than the knowledge of having no choice…

Along this line of authoritarian governance, we also find within this chapter another bombshell:

50 USC § 1515 – Suspension; Presidential authorization

After November 19, 1969, the operation of this chapter, or any portion thereof, may be suspended by the President during the period of any war declared by Congress and during the period of any national emergency declared by Congress or by the President.

Note here that only Congress can officially declare a war, and has not done so since World War 2. The president has been acting under a state of emergency for all incursions, occupations, invasions, and any other illegal violent campaigns in more than 50 countries since WW2. A declared national emergency is nothing but a war against the definition of the emergency – a way for the Executive Branch to bypass Congress and wage unlawful aggressions without even the consideration of the people or their so-called representatives.

But we must still never forget the most important aspect of this absurd power of the President… IT WAS GRANTED BY CONGRESS!!!

For those of you unfamiliar with the past and current state of the already declared national emergencies, you should know that since 1933 with President Roosevelt’s emergency declaration for (a war against) the “Great Depression”, each new president has declared new national emergencies which have perpetually kept the United States in this “period” of a state of national emergency. Obama, for instance, declared a national emergency for the so-called “swine flu” of 2009, creating the justification not only to suspend all law, but to create a mandate for mandatory vaccination programs and the laws that protect it. This horrifying state of government essentially makes congress meek (by its own accord allowed in its own US CODE) while the presidential dictator has the authority to do as he pleases (as long as he files a report to congress, lol!). Currently, we are in a perpetual state of national emergency in a war against the word “terrorism” – a nondescript moniker that allows the United States military to enter any country unlawfully and violently in pursuit of “terrorists”. Of course, a terrorist is not a country or a government, no more than it is a military force. It is an imaginary straw-man that justifies the worse kind of “legal” criminal behavior by the Executive CIA and Deptartment of Defense (also both created by Congress to have powers outside of congressional reach by the Congress itself).

When a president can at a whim suspend any written law, truly there is no law. And the suspension of this law in US CODE would simply mean that the president has free reign to do what he pleases with biological weapons without filing a report to congress (the “people”) and with absolutely no restrictions.

Consider this: If the president wished, at any time he could declare global warming, global cooling, climate change, or whatever key-word of the day is being floated around the media that month as a “national emergency”. Thus, this entire chapter of code would mean absolutely nothing, and there would be no limits upon the use of biological agents at all to combat the emergency. Now consider that this section does not specify what type of emergency is to be declared, only that any emergency is in fact declared.

The law is lawless…

But the illusion of law and justice is much easier to sell to an ignorant citizenry than the reality of our government as a totalitarian entity, and so the US CODE is good enough to justify Geo-engineering and other biological weapons and testing on the human population – and for “the deleterious alteration of our environment”.

The next Section is a prohibition and also an exemption upon the delivery of these biological agents:

50 USC § 1516 – Delivery systems

None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act shall be used for the procurement of delivery systems specifically designed to disseminate lethal chemical or any biological warfare agents, or for the procurement of delivery system parts or components specifically designed for such purpose, unless the President shall certify to the Congress that such procurement is essential to the safety and security of the United States.

If the president is convinced that Geo-engineering is “essential to the safety and security of the United States”, then the president simply need write up a certified report stating such, write it down in the national register, and suddenly weather modification is now legally being done for the protection of the body politic (the people of the United States) and its continuity.

It also states that congress shall appropriate no funds towards the procurement of “delivery systems” (i.e. modified aircraft) “to disseminate lethal chemical or any biological agents” unless…

Note here that the word “any” in front of “biological agents” literally means that “any” form of biological agent can be utilized and “disseminated” over the skies of the United States. For the purposes of this sentence, we do not go to a modern English language dictionary for the definition of “biological agent”. We go back to 50 USC/Section 1520a/Paragraph (e) – which states again:

(e) “Biological agent” defined

(1) death, disease, or other biological malfunction in a human, an animal, a plant, or another living organism;

(2) deterioration of food, water, equipment, supplies, or materials of any kind; or

(3) deleterious alteration of the environment.

This is the definition for this chapter of “biological agent”

Thus, “any” “biological agent” (as defined here in this CODE) can be procured and utilized upon the American people. This includes any thing used and mixed within the Geo-engineering for its “delivery” and “dissemination”. Literally, the sky’s the limit (pun intended)!

If you haven’t gotten the clue yet, Geo-engineering is a chemical weapon – placing chemicals in the sky to combat “climate change”. In legal language, such as with the word “terrorist”, any thing or concept can be made an “enemy” for which to fight.

This fact is certainly spoken about within military (DOD) documents such as “Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025”

LINK–> http://csat.au.af.mil/2025/volume3/vol3ch15.pdf

Excerpt:

What Do We Mean by “Weather-modification”?

Today, weather-modification is the alteration of weather phenomena over a limited area for a limited period of time.9 Within the next three decades, the concept of weather-modification could expand to include the ability to shape weather patterns by influencing their determining factors.10 Achieving such a highly accurate and reasonably precise weather-modification capability in the next 30 years will require overcoming some challenging but not insurmountable technological and legal hurdles…

…in the authors’ judgment, the technical obstacles preventing their application appear insurmountable within 30 years.12 If this were not the case, such applications would have been included in this report as potential military options, despite their controversial and potentially malevolent nature and their inconsistency with standing UN agreements to which the US is a signatory.

On the other hand, the weather-modification applications proposed in this report range from technically proven to potentially feasible. They are similar, however, in that none are currently employed or envisioned for employment by our operational forces. They are also similar in their potential value for the war fighter of the future, as we hope to convey in the following chapters. A notional integrated system that incorporates weather-modification tools will be described in the next chapter; how those tools might be applied are then discussed within the framework of the Concept of Operations in chapter 4…

(Listed sources in report):

10 William Bown, “Mathematicians Learn How to Tame Chaos,” New Scientist, 30 May 1992, 16.

11 CJCSI 3810.01, Meteorological and Oceanographic Operations, 10 January 95. This CJCS Instruction establishes policy and assigns responsibilities for conducting meteorological and oceanographic operations. It also defines the terms widespread, long-lasting, and severe, in order to identify those activities that US forces are prohibited from conducting under the terms of the UN Environmental Modification Convention. Widespread is defined as encompassing an area on the scale of several hundred km; long-lasting means lasting for a period of months, or approximately a season; and severe involves serious or significant disruption or harm to human life, natural and economic resources, or other assets.

12 Concern about the unintended consequences of attempting to “control” the weather is well justified. Weather is a classic example of a chaotic system (i.e., a system that never exactly repeats itself). A chaotic system is also extremely sensitive: minuscule differences in conditions greatly affect outcomes…

End Excerpt.

See the Space.com article entitled “U.S. Military Wants To Own The Weather” here:

LINK–> http://www.space.com/1725-military-weather.html

For more information on the part that the United Nations plays in this, as well as international treaties applied to Geo-engineering and statutes from all over the country and world, see my previous research here:

LINK–> https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2011/11/25/geoengineering-and-cloud-seeding/

And for other research tips and help in locating weather modification projects and terminology through your own internet searches, please consider my article here:

LINK–> https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2012/08/25/research-tips/

And let’s not forget the “Space Preservation Act of 2001”, HR 2977, which was introduced by Representative Dennis Kucinich. It stated:

Sec. 7. DEFINITITIONS. In this Act:

(2)(A) “The terms ‘weapon’ and ‘weapons system’ mean a device capable of any of the following: (ii) Inflicting death or injury on, or damaging or destroying, a person (or the biological life, bodily health, mental health, or physical and economic well-being of a person)–(III) by expelling chemical or biological agents in the vicinity of a person.”

Section 7, 2 (C) “The term ‘exotic weapons systems’ includes weapons designed to damage space or NATURAL ECOSYSTEMS (such as the ionosphere and upper atmosphere) or CLIMATE, WEATHER, and tectonic systems with the purpose of inducing damage or destruction upon a target population or region on earth or in space.”

LINK–> http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/107/hr2977 (Note: This bill did not pass, nor did its 2002 predecessor.)

The New Zealand Herald reported:

“New Zealand and the United States conducted thousands of secret tests attempting to create a “tsunami bomb” during World War Two, a New Zealand author has claimed.

About 3,700 bombs were exploded off Auckland’s Whangaparaoa Peninsula and New Caledonia in the operation, dubbed “Project Seal”.

The operation found a series of 10 large offshore explosions could generate a 10 metre tsunami, according to research by Kiwi author and film-maker Ray Waru.

“Presumably if the atomic bomb had not worked as well as it did, we might have been tsunami-ing people,” Mr Waru told the Telegraph.

Mr Waru told the Telegraph the project was launched in 1944 after US naval officer E A Gibson noted that blasts used to clear coral reefs around Pacific Islands often created a large wave.

He found the plans in military files in the national archives and has published his discoveries in the book, Secrets and Treasures.

The files reportedly said initial testing was positive, however the project was ditched in early 1945. It was concluded that a single explosion would not be powerful enough to generate a tsunami, but a line of about 2 million kilograms of explosives about 8km from shore could create a giant wave capable of inundating a small city.”

LINK–> http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10857121

Continuing with the US CODE on Biological Weapons and the psychopaths who love them…

50 USC § 1512 – Transportation, open air testing, and disposal; Presidents determination; report to Congress; notice to Congress and State Governors

None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or any other Act may be used for the transportation of any lethal chemical or any biological warfare agent to or from any military installation in the United States, or the open air testing of any such agent within the United States, or the disposal of any such agent within the United States until the following procedures have been implemented… (see US CODE for full details)

This section continues to state how official sounding reports must be made in order for these biological agents to be used on the United States population legally and with informed consent of the people (representatives). It also lets us know that our elected State governors are also well aware of this Biological Weapons Program and that they are indeed well-informed about it. Thus, they are certainly aware of and forced to approve Geo-engineering, as we will see in a moment…

On that note, I think we have now well established the Federal precedent for Geo-engineering and that our government is not in any way concerned with the effects of that practice upon the human or any other population.

So now let’s move on to the local level – the very thing that allows National fly-by’s of weather modification planes over State lands where people reside.

–=–
State Statutes
–=–

On the State level, we begin with the Utah State Code, Title 17, Chapter 15, Section 3, which will be similar in your own state and not hard to find:

Water and Irrigation.

Chapter 15: Modification of Weather

Section 3: Cloud seeding to increase precipitation — Control of Division of Water Resources — Powers and authority of division — “Cloud seeding” and “cloud-seeding project” defined:

The state of Utah through the Division of Water Resources shall be the only entity, private or public, that shall have authority to authorize cloud-seeding research, evaluation, or implementation projects to alter precipitation, cloud forms, or meteorological parameters within the state of Utah, except cloud seeding for the suppression of fog; and frost prevention measures for the protection of orchards and crops are excluded from the coverage of this act. The Division of Water Resources shall authorize and may sponsor or develop local or state-wide cloud-seeding projects that conform to over-all state water planning objectives and are determined to be feasible by the Division of Water Resources. The Division of Water Resources may contract with the Utah water research laboratory or any other individual or organization for consultation and/or assistance in developing cloud-seeding projects or in furthering necessary research of cloud seeding or other factors that may be affected by cloud-seeding activities. Cloud seeding as used in this act shall be construed to mean all acts undertaken to artificially distribute or create nuclei in cloud masses for the purposes of altering precipitation, cloud forms, or other meteorological parameters. A cloud-seeding project as used in this act shall be a planned project to evaluate meteorological conditions, perform cloud seeding, and evaluate results.

(Source–> http://le.utah.gov/~code/TITLE73/htm/73_15_000300.htm)

Research purposes…

From this Utah State Code we now know that the “Utah Division of Water Resources” is the only agency that has authority to authorize cloud seeding (weather modification) in the skies above the State of Utah for experimental purposes other than fog suppression. Thus the Utah Division of Water Resources shall be the focus of our legal demand of non-consent.

Continuing with the “1973 CLOUD SEEDING TO INCREASE PRECIPITATION ACT”, Title 73, Chapter 15 in Utah State Code:

Section 4. Water from cloud seeding part of natural water supply — Notice of intent prior to cloud-seeding project.

All water derived as a result of cloud seeding shall be considered a part of the natural water supply of the basin in the same sense as if no cloud seeding operations had been conducted, and any water so derived shall not be subject to new appropriations but shall be administered and distributed to users on the stream system in accordance with existing water rights. A notice of intent shall be filed with the Division of Water Rights prior to the commencement of a cloud-seeding project.

Ah, so now we have confirmed that by law a “notice of intent” must also be filed for all cloud-seeding projects in order to inform the public and to attain its silent, un-challenging consent through another independent agency – the Division of Water Rights. Bear in mind that both of these government offices are “special districts” which are run by not elected but appointed officials. Please also note that “water rights” in Utah are not for the people, but are actually similar to stock certificates for those who hold the stock in those rights, like farmers and the “City” municipal corporations, which then sells that water back to the people through the water district – another appointed business office of government at the taxpayers expense. Never forget that you are also a customer of government, not just a taxpayer.

Section 5. Transfer of records and data to division — Establishment of reporting and record-keeping procedures.

All records and data collected by the department of meteorology of the state school of mines and mineral industries of the University of Utah since March 14, 1953, shall be transferred to the Division of Water Resources, there to be a permanent record. The Division of Water Resources shall establish forms and/or criteria for reporting data and record keeping and cause that a permanent record is kept of all pertinent data related to cloud-seeding projects, cloud-seeding research projects, or research related to other factors that may be affected by cloud-seeding activities.

And now we know that a permanent record is kept by the Utah Division of Water Resources of all or most weather modification projects sponsored by the State, both past and present, as well as for any “other factors” of which that climate modification might have affected. And we know that all of this data was transferred into to this incorporated district. And none of these projects were ever approved by voters. Instead, they were conducted without comprehension and without asking. Good to know…

Section 6. Cloud-seeding contractors — Registration

Any individual or organization that would like to become a cloud-seeding contractor in the state of Utah shall register with the Division of Water Resources. As a part of the registration the applicant shall meet qualifications established by the Division of Water Resources and submit proof of financial responsibility in order to give reasonable assurance of protection to the public in the event it should be established that damages were caused to third parties as a result of negligence in carrying out a cloud-seeding project.

And now we know that there is a list within this agency that shows all past and future weather modification projects and the private contracted corporations who carried them out via a registration record. And more importantly, we now know that they have no special protection by government, and these private corporations as contractors can be sued for damages by the people for causing harm.

We also now know that “cloud-seeding” is not necessarily safe, and is certainly harmful in some possible circumstances that are unstated here in Section 6. This likely means that somewhere in these same records, there exists research and a listing of potential damages which can be induced by weather modification.

Section 7. Precipitation caused by authorized project not presumed to constitute trespass or nuisance.

The mere dissemination of materials and substances into the atmosphere or causing precipitation pursuant to an authorized cloud-seeding project shall not give rise to any presumption that such use of the atmosphere or lands constitutes trespass or involves an actionable or enjoinable public or private nuisance.

Here, government has made a public declaration of the fact that just the physical act of spraying heavy metals and toxins into the air is apparently not to be considered a public or private nuisance. This declaratory statement is a ridiculous opinion, of course, and really means that the government or these private corporations are somewhat protected by government CODE just by this stated opinion. This simply means that it must be proven that a nuisance or trespass has occurred, and that the fact that the spraying occurred in the first place is not grounds for legal action alone. Damage or harm must be shown aside from just the spraying itself.

Note that this is why just speaking, holding up a sign, signing a petition, or yelling from the top of your lungs to stop spraying our skies is never and never will be enough to halt the spraying, as we can read here. Government counts on the public’s lack of legal knowledge and power to withdraw consent in order to function against the wishes of the still-consenting-without-realizing-it protesters. This unrealized consent is similar to protesting the Federal Reserve while the activists still are spending Federal Reserve Notes to purchase the materials to make up their protest signs. The use (spending) is the consent to the legitimacy of the Fed and its Federal currency, and the non-legal protest means absolutely nothing to government.

Withdrawal of consent is a legal process requiring notarization through the mail system. It is definitely not the act of placing clever and colored Sharpie and Magic Marker doodles all over a cardboard sign attached to a 10×2 piece of wood and standing in front of some government building begging and pleading for them to stop poisoning the atmosphere.

If you want to protest, do it right – legally claim your non-consent! See the end of this article for this info…

Chapter 8. Cloud seeding in Utah to target area in adjoining state.

Cloud seeding in Utah to target an area in an adjoining state is prohibited except upon full compliance of the laws of the target area state the same as if the cloud-seeding operation took place in the target area state, as well as the other provisions of this act.

Ah, so here we have established cross-border jurisdictions set up to ensure proper coverage.

We can then look at a more detailed description of the rules relating to weather modification (cloud-seeding) at the “Utah Division of Administrative Rules”. And this is very important to our goals:

R653-5-7. Procedures for Acquisition of Permit.

(1) Application for Permit: To qualify for a cloud seeding permit a licensee must:

(g) File with the Division, within 15 days from the last date of the publication of notice, proof that the applicant caused the notice of intention to be published at least once a week for three consecutive weeks in a newspaper having a general circulation within each county in which the operation is to be conducted and in which the affected area is located. Publication of notice shall not commence until the applicant has received approval of the form and substance of the notice of intention from the Director.

And so here we have come full circle back to our public notice of intent in the Salt Lake Tribune. We have the informed consent requirement of placing a public legal notice in newspapers within the counties for three consecutive weeks where weather modification shall take place by the private contracting corporations that will be doing the aerial spraying.

And in the Public Notice we first viewed above, we can see that this was for most or all counties in Utah, and so this notice was likely circulated within all local newspaper in each county for three weeks.

And not one person in Utah said no…

We can now see the full process of the manufacturing of informed consent of the people of the State by the government office who controls and regulates Weather Modification. We can see that all of these weather modification projects are absolutely 100% fully known and approved by government on behalf of the people and their unwitting informed consent. And we now have an actual way to truly withdraw our individual consent for this by referring to all of the above CODES and statutes in our legal demand.

The Utah Division of Water Resources website can be found here: http://www.water.utah.gov/

–=–
What’s The Big Deal?
It’s harmless, Right?
–=–

Some people may be thinking that this is an alarmist presentation, that making snow for skiers is a time-honored tradition and much more important for the profit and enjoyment of tourism in the ski resorts than any harm to the environment that it may cause. Perhaps that’s because silver and mineral compounds are not even slightly understood by the people who find skiing more important than health.

“Silver Iodide”, as mentioned in the Public Notice of Intent above, is listed as the main compound to be used for most of Utah’s non-experimental (non-research) weather modification. So what is silver iodide and what effects will it have on the environment?

While the precious metal called Silver (Ag) has many wonderful traits and applications in human and corporate life, this does not in any way mean that it is harmless when sprayed over the environment. Silver has long been known to be an antiseptic, and silver coins used to be used as for water purification by simply dropping a 90% silver coin into a barrel of water, creating a non-septic drinkable water and killing parasites and other water-born pathogens. Silver is used today in many modern medical uses from silver lined bandages and ointments that prevent infection and bacterial growth to silver-lined socks to control foot odor (by preventing fungus’s, bacteria, etc.). And of course many people make their own colloidal silver water for personal consumption and health, again as an anti-septic within the body. Silver, gold, and like metals in their true elemental form are even known to help with sleep issues like insomnia.

But while these fungus and bacterial killing effects of silver are wonderful life-saving miracles in the fields of medicine and health, we must consider that these same effects will inevitably be felt in a negative way in nature if unnaturally introduced year after year.

What will silver do for instance, to the needed and necessary trillions of “bugs” and other microorganisms that inhabit the area being targeted with this silver iodide based weather modification? Nature, after all, is naturally septic for a reason. Thus, applying a known anti-septic such as that used in experimental weather modification and Geo-engineering is an irresponsible and potentially life-destroying practice – all in the name of ski resorts ability to sell lift tickets.

Imagine what would eventually happen to all life on this planet, even the microscopic life you can’t see, if the entire planet is being sprayed with antiseptics and other life-destroying metals on a continuing “experimental” campaign of Geo-engineering. Unfortunately, we are entering the age that we are able to see the destruction all around us.

In fact, we can read that the spread of bio-available forms of aluminum which do not appear in nature is so bad that Monsanto and other companies (along with government cooperation and ownership of some patents by government) has created aluminum stress-resistant seeds! While nature is shutting itself off from nature, these monster corporations are profiting from a monopoly on the only Genetically modified lifeforms that can live in such a modified environment.

Farmwars.com reports:

The patent for aluminum resistance mentioned in What in the World are They Spraying? turns out to be owned by the USDA and Brazil’s agricultural department, not Monsanto directly… and evidently, made for acidic soil and will not be effective in an alkaline soil caused by chemtrailing. Therefore, it appears that this particular patent most likely is targeted for Africa, which seems to be a major biotech interest…

Monsanto DOES own patents that appear to mitigate the effects of Geo-engineering, that can be applied to a whole host of fruits, trees, grains and veggies. A quick patent search brings up 3,981 hits for Monsanto and Stress Tolerance. Mendel Biotechnology is partners with Monsanto in several of these patents. This is taken from one of the joint patents:

“The claimed invention, in the field of functional genomics and the characterization of plant genes for the improvement of plants, was made by or on behalf of Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. and Monsanto Corporation as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement in effect on or before the date the claimed invention was made.”

Here is a patent titled “Stress tolerant plants and methods thereof,” that is owned by Monsanto, and seems to address all forms of abiotic stress that weather manipulation and chemtrails can cause:

“FIELD OF THE INVENTION

Described herein are inventions in the field of plant molecular biology and plant genetic engineering. In particular, DNA constructs encoding a polypeptide and transgenic plants containing the DNA constructs are provided. The transgenic plants are characterized by improved stress tolerance.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

One of the goals of plant genetic engineering is to produce plants with agronomically, horticulturally or economically important characteristics or traits. Traits of particular interest include high yield, improved quality and yield stability. The yield from a plant is greatly influenced by external environmental factors including water availability and heat, of which tolerance of extremes is in turn influenced by internal developmental factors. Enhancement of plant yield may be achieved by genetically modifying the plant to be tolerant to yield losses due to stressful environmental conditions, such as heat and drought stress.

Seed and fruit production are both limited inherently due to abiotic stress. Soybean ( Glycine max ), for instance, is a crop species that suffers from loss of seed germination during storage and fails to germinate when soil temperatures are cool (Zhang et al., Plant Soil 188: (1997)). This is also true in corn and other plants of agronomic importance. Improvement of abiotic stress tolerance in plants would be an agronomic advantage to growers allowing enhanced growth and/or germination in cold, drought, flood, heat, UV stress, ozone increases, acid rain, pollution, salt stress, heavy metals, mineralized soils, and other abiotic stresses.”

(Source: http://www.freepatentsonline.com/7851676.html)

Here are the plants that this “invention” intends to cover:

The method of claim 7, wherein said crop plant is selected from the group consisting of corn, soybean, wheat, cotton, rice and rapeseed/canola.

Further on down, we find that a whole host of other plants are under the microscope and used for the process as well:

The transgenic plant is selected from the group consisting of: Acacia , alfalfa, aneth, apple, apricot, artichoke, arugula, asparagus, avocado, banana, barley, beans, beet, blackberry, blueberry, broccoli, brussels sprouts, cabbage, canola, cantaloupe, carrot, cassaya, cauliflower, celery, cherry, cilantro, citrus, clementines, coffee, corn, cotton, cucumber, Douglas fir, eggplant, endive, escarole, eucalyptus, fennel, figs, forest tree, gourd, grape, grapefruit, honey dew, jicama, kiwifruit, lettuce, leeks, lemon, lime, loblolly pine, mango, melon, millet, mushroom, nut, oat, okra, onion, orange, papaya, parsley, pea, peach, peanut, pear, pepper, persimmon, pine, pineapple, plantain, plum, pomegranate, poplar, potato, pumpkin, quince, radiata pine, radicchio, radish, raspberry, rice, rye, sorghum, southern pine, soybean, spinach, squash, strawberry, sugarbeet, sugarcane, sunflower, sweet potato, sweetgum, tangerine, tea, tobacco, tomato, turf, a vine, watermelon, wheat, yams, and zucchini.”

(Source: http://www.freepatentsonline.com/7851676.html)

(Article Source: http://farmwars.info/?p=7760)

You see, if you poison nature so that food will not grow naturally, you can then have total control over the only unnatural food that will grow in what nature is becoming.

But again, what is the most important aspect of this entire issue?

Government issues the patents!!! Government is offering protection to these corporations, and is a heavy controlling investor into these mega-corporations that receives dividends and patent rights itself for these inventions. And so we the people must not simply trust that government will have a change of heart and suddenly protect the people from its investment held corporations. The conflict of interest here is so great as to be off the scale of corruption.

And so the people must once again stop playing the fools they have been trained to be, and we must each individually take legal action against government. And without even realizing it, the people have the highest power of the land and the only tool aside from all out violent revolt to stop this organized crime and killing of the natural planet – the withdrawal of their legal consent. For a truly informed public would never allow this to happen. It is time to stop talking and to start taking action in the only way that matters.

Please, keep reading…

Perhaps you are not familiar with the difference between organic minerals and inorganic mineral compounds?

It is important to note that the natural weather cycles of rainfall occur precisely due to the distillation (evaporation) process. Very much like the artificial bottled water distillation process for drinking, in nature the water is sucked into the atmosphere clean in its pure form of H2O – leaving the trace minerals behind – then falling back to the Earth again while collecting and delivering trace minerals as the naturally pure water goes back into the ground to nurture life. This is natures supplement delivery system that plants rely upon for their very life.

But when this natural distillation process is altered by adding mineral compounds to the process such as silver iodide, that water is no longer pure. Instead, it is falling to Earth in an altered (inorganic) form. And since minerals are magnetically attracted to each other (becoming compounds of two or more minerals together – like the calcium and carbon that bind to create inorganic calcium carbonate that does not dissolve in water, otherwise known as chalk that is found in most misleading “supplements”) many of these trace minerals are also altered as they bind together.

The root system of a plant or tree can only absorb the smallest of pure trace minerals into their root systems, in particles so small as to be angstrom-sized (1 million times smaller than in a typical supplement pill). The human body works in quite the same way, where small organic minerals (not compounds) can enter and pass through the blood-brain barrier (compounds like calcium carbonate cannot do this).

Since silver iodide is not a natural mineral substance generally found in the soil, not to mention the mass amounts of bio-available aluminum, boron, and other compounds used in experimental Geo-engineering, the root system of these living systems of plants and trees defend themselves by closing off their own absorption capability to any naturally occurring organic and inorganic nutrient minerals in the soil. In short, the trees and plant-life are literally killing themselves to protect themselves from these toxic metals being sprayed in our skies by going on a hunger strike.

We must understand that plants absorb minerals broken down by the humic and fulvic acids in the soils, dissolving the dualistic nature of compounds into these organic minerals at a size small enough to break the absorption barrier of those root systems. A compound is two or more bound minerals, and is generally in an inorganic form. Silver iodide is an inorganic compound not usable by living organisms, and is not able to be broken down naturally.

So let’s uncover what “silver iodide” as used to create nucleation actually is:

Silver iodide is prepared by reaction of an iodide solution (e.g. potassium iodide) with a solution of silver ions (e.g. silver nitrate). A yellowish solid quickly precipitates. The solid is a mixture of the two principal phases. Dissolution of the AgI in hydroiodic acid, followed by dilution with water precipitates β-AgI. Alternatively, dissolution of AgI in a solution of concentrated silver nitrate followed by dilution affords α-AgI. If the preparation is not conducted in the absence of sunlight, the solid darkens rapidly, the light causing the reduction of ionic silver to metallic. The photo-sensitivity varies with sample purity.

Cloud seeding

The crystalline structure of β-AgI is similar to that of ice, allowing it to induce freezing by the process known as heterogeneous nucleation. Approximately 50,000 kg/year are used for cloud seeding annually, each seeding experiment consuming 10-50 grams.

An azeotrope is a mixture of two or more liquids in such a way that its components cannot be altered by simple distillation. This happens because, when an azeotrope is boiled, the vapor it produces has proportionate constituents as the original mixture.

Because their composition is unchanged by distillation, azeotropes are also called constant boiling mixtures. The word azeotrope is derived from the Greek words ζέειν (boil) and τρόπος (state) combined with the prefix α- (no) to give the overall meaning, “no change on boiling”.

Once this silver iodide falls to the Earth it does not dissipate, for chemical compounds are not dissoluble in water. This is why most mineral supplements taken by humans do absolutely no good within the body. To see how calcium carbonate reacts within your own body (of 70% water), you can do your own simple experiment. Just stick a piece of chalk (the inorganic compound calcium carbonate) in a glass of water and come back in one week. It will not dissolve in water. In fact, these calcium deposits eventually build up in the body and begin to harm it. Even with an over-abundance of the inorganic compound calcuim carbonate taken through typical supplements (99% of the market), a woman’s body will first derive its calcium requirements from the existing organic bones of that woman before it will ever be able to utilize the inorganic compound that is stored within the body. Thus, a lack of the acutal organic mineral calcium creates a reaction called “osteoporosis”.

Please listen to this important and dyer interview with Dane Wigington (geoengineeringwatch.org) here for more on the consequences in saturating the biosphere with these types of man-made compounds, and how nucleation by cloud seeding has created total disaster in our natural climate systems (28 minutes: highly recommended)

GeoEngineeringWatch website: http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/

And to show how helplessly ignorant most groups are of what i am putting forward here today, here is the “What You Can Do” list that the Geo-engineering Watch website gives – with not one legal remedy or concept mentioned.

What You Can Do: http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/what-you-can-do/

Please don’t take this as any form of disrespect in any way, for these folks have done as much or more than anyone to inform the public of this problem and its intricate web of implementation. This is only to point out the purposeful obfuscation by media, education, and government as to the true power of the people and the necessity of their consent. In fact, this is the group I hope most of all to pick this project up and run with it…

And now, after many decades of spraying the skies, whole forest systems that once cleaned the air of carbons are instead dying and releasing carbons into the air. They are starving themselves to protect themselves.

Now, is it really your attitude that the sport of skiing is really so important that we should even consider making artificial snow for that purpose using silver iodide? And is the control of the weather by our military psychopaths really so important that extinction level events in all species and plant-life are worth the price of that control?

I don’t think so.

If you feel the same, let’s you and I do something about it…

–=–
Government Defines Public Body, Notice, Hearing
–=–

Here is what Utah State government defines within its CODES for the people to understand what the word “public” means:

A Public Body is any administrative, advisory, executive, or legislative body of the state or its political subdivisions that: is created by the Utah Constitution, statute, rule, ordinance, or resolution; consists of two or more persons; expends, disburses, or is supported in whole or in part by tax revenue; and is vested with the authority to make decisions regarding the public’s business.

A Public Notice is a way of informing the general public of government or government-related activities which may concern their local area, municipality, county, or state.

A Public Meeting is a forum that is reasonably structured and formal in nature, and open to the general public.

A Public Hearing is a portion of a meeting intended to receive input from the general public. A public hearing may be required by ordinance or statute. The time, place and subject of the hearing must be posted as required by an ordinance or statute.

A Legal Notice is a communication required to be made public by a state statute or state agency rule; or a notice required for judicial proceedings or by judicial decision. Legal notice does not include a public notice published by a public body in accordance with the provisions of Sections 52-4-202 and 63F-1-701.

“Utah’s public bodies are required to post notices of open meetings and other public notices on the Public Notice Website. The statutes establishing this website are in Utah Code 63F-1-701, but there are many mandates dictating the information and timing of public notices.”

(Source: http://www.utah.gov/pmn/index.html)

Here we have more evidence that nothing in government can be accomplished without first notifying the public through a legal notice and in some cases a public hearing, thus securing the illusion of informed consent of the people. And Utah created a website to allow the people to search and view all public legal notices, and chances are a similar site was created in your State.

So what do we need to do?

The first step of this plan is of course to monitor your local government websites and newspapers to ensure that these types of notices do not go unchallenged. For this I would suggest setting up a watchdog group in each county or States that continuously searches for and shares with others these notices of intent. They can be for anything from weather modification to municipal bonds. In this way the people can have the opportunity to express and demand notice of their non-consent to the decisions made by appointed and elected officials. They are not above the law, and the law requires informed consent!!!

So this is the first step: finding the legal notices that fulfill the requirement of informed consent and challenging them individually through a written legal notice of non-consent.

–=–
A Short Lesson In Court Procedures
–=–

I cannot stress enough here that this is a project and effort that should not involve attorneys or any form of representation whatsoever. If you’d like an attorney to help draft your individual legal notice and demand, so be it. But under no circumstances should you assign your rights over to another artificial person (a representative). You already have done this wtih government (which is mostly attorneys) and look where it has got us! The services of an attorney should be nipped in the butt the second your official letter is drafted and no later. You are your own advocate. Period!

And so this chore will require time and effort for each individual person who wishes to participate. In other words, it will require you to actually get up off of your ass and do something about what’s so wrong with the world, instead of just talking about it or watching another video about it. And perhaps this fact is what is so unheard of and revolutionary about this process – self-empowerment like you have never known it before. Waking up the sleeping giant within each of us.

Unfortunately this is the point were everything becomes blurry for most of us, because in the past we always allow attorneys to go to court on our behalf. So we have never learned the legal system or the laws that bind it. We can use it as a tool for our own advantage, if we just know how to find the right avenue.

The best part about this all is that you will likely never have to step in front of a judge or in a courtroom at all – ever.

This should very much put your mind at ease…

You see, all of what this plan involves can be done either through the U.S. Mail system or by speaking with the Court Clerk outside of the courtroom and without addressing a judge. In fact, let me say right now that you should never enter into a courtroom for any part of this effort unless I say so in the future, and this will likely never happen.

But in order for our collective but individual efforts to have merit and legal credibility, we must understand the full process of how to deliver these letters, and which specific government officials (employees) to talk to and force them to accept our letters of non-consent.

The difference between a demand and a plea is very important. Simply stated, while a plea is asking permission from government, a demand is not a choice. It’s a DEMAND! We are not asking permission from government, we are legally demanding an action.

With that said, we must not fall into the trap of entering into any form of administrative court, which is what we are used to doing through no fault of our own but the ignorance of the law. The administrative court of equity is where attorneys feed on unwary innocents. And we must understand that judges are nothing more than attorneys in black robes – administrative officers. So we want to avoid the de facto administrative courts all together.

Instead, we must always utilize what is called the “Court of Record”, which is the highest court in the land. It is called the Court of RECORD because this court is what creates a public record. The court itself does not have a choice in the matter, and your submission of demand of non-consent must be accepted and placed into the public record. This is oh- so important to our cause, for without an official public record of your individual non-consent to having biological agents sprayed upon you, there is nothing that can later be used to prove that the people voiced their non-consent in the public record. You see, this step must be done properly in the proper court, or this effort will ultimately be left up to governments administration to decide for you. The Court of Record is so important and so high, that it even overshadows the Supreme Court itself. For the Supreme Court can only issue what is called “opinions’ on legal matters. So we would wish to avoid this issue for our own purposes from entering into this administrative Supreme Court and instead want it to be left up to a jury of our peers in a court of law of the people – a grand jury.

Of these two courts, there is a huge and unavoidable difference. Thus, we must enter our legal demand of non-consent within and only within the Court of Record.

But how do we do this so as to guarantee our letter will be entered into the proper court for public record?

Ah, this brings us to your simple act of your participation – the only real effort you must make on behalf of yourself and your family to stop Geo-engineering for good.

I would recommend that you personally hand-deliver your letter of non-consent to what is called the “COURT CLERK“.

I cannot stress the importance of verifying this title with the officer of the court that you speak to at the court house.

What is the Court Clerk?

Only the most important officer of the judicial system!

With the highest rate of required bonded insurance, the Court Clerk has the power to not only enter your demand as public record, but may also issue a “default judgement” on your behalf for non-response by the other party. The other party, in this case, is the government.

The court will have many lower “Clerks of the Court” running around, but these amount to nothing more than secretaries for the judges themselves. These are administrative clerks in the administrative court – where attorneys rule.

We only want the “Court Clerk”, and there will likely be only one in the entire courthouse.

This is the person we must demand to speak to and verify their title. And then we must receive a time-stamp and official “seal” of the court proving it was entered into the proper Court of Record. Nothing else will do, and no other clerk of that court can help you. Again, you are not asking permission, you are demanding justice.

Once this letter of non-consent is filed and stamped as public record, it can now be sent out to the proper government and corporation offices that are responsible for Geo-engineering.

Within the letter itself, we would place a certain amount of business days that the defendant would be allowed to utilize before a response is required by law. If that office does not respond by that specified time, then you will go back into the court house and demand (not ask) that a default judgement be assigned to your case. And once this is again placed into the public record of the court, that a default judgement was indeed assigned, we now have the tool to take the government to court for acting against the will of the “people”. Remember… silence is consent to contract. If government does not respond, it now has an obligation to fulfill the contract, which means it must cease and desist weather modification until the subject is addressed publicly.

Now imagine if 10’s of thousands of individual “people” did the same thing, creating public records of government’s blatant and illegal disregard of the people’s non-consent, acting on the record without the consent of all people they represent. Now imagine millions from all over the country. Without informed consent the only alternative is to operate without informed consent – which as we have read is absolutely unlawful.

If government does respond, while it may beat around the bush for a while, we must remain persistent and respond to each and every response that comes back to us individually, until the record is set. But in both of these scenarios, the legal notice that you and many others do not consent can not be summarily dismissed because it is officially part of the public record.

The most important aspect here is the creation of the public record in the proper court forum that gives government notice of your non-consent. Without this, it will continue to operate as is while assuming your voluntary informed consent. With the record in place, the government can only continue to operate under fraud and contempt of the people, showing its true colors and leaving it open to legal remedy by the people so condemned.

This is as far as I will go with the process itself, as this will take much more effort and organization to get the process going and done correctly. My objective here is only to put forward this plan so that others may be moved to implement it. And for this, I need each and every one of that have read this far to pass this on to your friends and to groups who are actually organized enough to pull a plan of this magnitude together. For this, we need as many individuals with as much word of mouth as possible. But again, in the end, we must step out of this comfort zone of social media and hearsay to actually take the action needed.

–=–
What To Do Now
–=–

To be honest, I do not kid myself or have any disillusion that this writing will spark some glorious revolution of legal paperwork that floods the court system and government officers to the point that they will end this madness of altering our environment. Perhaps the notion that was put forward by the twisted mind of Aldus Huxley describes the reality of our collective disposition best when he stated that we will grow to love our servitude to this system of government, with the help of anti-depressants and other mind altering pharmaceuticals for which he simply referred to as Soma. Inaction seems to be the new action!

But for the possibilities related to this idea I have something that seems rare these days for someone like me… hope. I dare to hope in these hopeless times that the people finally stand up for themselves and revoke their consent to Geo-engineering and to government tyranny. For if this can be done, imagine what else the government does with our implied consent that can be stopped cold. War, murder, torture, the patenting and cloning of life, rendition and incarceration of innocent men and women for profit… the list goes on and on.

But I will hold out with my small sliver of hope that you will not just brush this idea aside, and instead share it and make it happen.

I’ve provided the CODES and statutes for all levels of governance of this destructive practice, and offered the only real solution that is actually available to such a people in such utter servitude to a government gone wild. Think about that for a minute… this is literally and legally the only solution available to us. That’s really heavy, and the moral and ethical responsibility of this is now on your soul, heavy as can be. That is, since you’ve actually read this far and now know what you must do.

And so for the immediate future, I can only ask you to help me by passing this information on to the proper organizations and people who might actually wish to join me in some form of tribunal that can organize the legal writing of these notices of non-consent for all people to uniformly utilize so that we can sooner than later end this chemical destruction of our home.

I fully accept and affirm that the above information may have errors or misconceptions on my own behalf, and would be very open to debate on this possibility. Please leave a comment below if you find fallacy or flaw with any of this. This is how it will be eventually perfected and I thank you. Trolls may go back to the hole they crawled from, and points or attacks without fact will be treated as troll-like behavior. Take the responsibility of fulfilling the burden of proof of your argument, as I have endeavored to do here.

You may email me at:

TemporaryInsanity4848@yahoo.com

But in truth, what I really need is someone out there to take the reigns of this project, a manager/producer of sorts, passionate enough to organize a few good men and women to head it, and then I will do my best to be part of that group along with my own team of trusted friends. This needs to be promoted by “chemtrail” websites especially, so that those who subscribe to such sites may further the plan.

Until then, I’m not financially or physically able to do this myself. And so I ask you to make this happen – to find the one person out there that has what it takes to organize such an undertaking without profit or ulterior motives, and without creating a need to join an organization or take representation. And perhaps this may be the most difficult part of the whole plan. The rest is easy, if the people choose to participate.

Until then, I thank you for taking the time to read to this point, and will continue to hope for brighter days (pun intended).

–Clint Richardson (Realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Saturday, March 16th, 2013

144 Comments

by realitybloger on March 16, 2013 • Permalink

Posted in Chemtrails and cloud seeding, Geo-engineering, global warming, Legal Remedies, Non-Consent

Posted by realitybloger on March 16, 2013

https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2013/03/16/the-only-way-we-can-stop-geoengineering/

Geoengineering And Cloud Seeding Statutes

There is such an effort to convince people about the reality of what are popularly called “chemtrails” – but what should be properly referred to as geoengineering, cloud seeding, or weather modification.

Most people simply point to the sky and say “look!”

Others go into extreme technical detail on the nature and conspiracy of these trails in the sky and where they originate from. But as with most of the topics that are considered by many to be conspiracy theory, weather modification can simply be “proven” to the most skeptical among us by the very state and federal codes that allow these trails in the sky to be laid in the first place.

There is no crime if all crime is legal…

And all 50 states are in a cooperative agreement to allow this spraying to commence uninhibited across state borders, which means that the governor of your state is in full compliance and acquiescence.

In the state of Washington for instance, the Washington State legislature passed the following legal codes regarding the aerial spraying over the State of Washington:

WAC 173-495-070 – Permit Requirements.

(1) Each weather modification operation not specifically exempted by statute or these regulations requires a permit. A separate permit must be issued for each operation.

(2) A license holder desiring to conduct a weather modification operation shall submit an application for a permit to ecology.

(3) The permit applicant must hold a valid weather modification license from the state of Washington.

(4) The applicant shall publish a notice of intention at least once a week for three consecutive weeks in a newspaper that has general circulation within the county in which the operation is to be conducted or affected.

(5) The licensee shall file proof of publication of the notice of intention with ecology within fifteen days from the date of last publication of the notice.

(6) The notice of intention must contain at least the following:

(a) The name and address of the licensee;

(b) The nature and object of the intended operation and the person or organization on whose behalf it is to be conducted;

(d) The area intended to be affected by the operation; and

(e) The materials and methods to be used in conducting the operation.

(7) The applicant shall furnish proof of financial responsibility, as described in WAC 173-495-120 of this chapter.

(8) The applicant shall pay a permit fee outlined in chapter 173-455 WAC.

(9) Before issuing a permit, ecology shall state, in writing, that the weather modification and control activities proposed have been determined to be for the general welfare and public good.

(10) Ecology shall hold a public hearing before any weather modification permit is issued.

(Source: http://apps.leg.wa.gov/wac/default.aspx?cite=173-495-070)

So with a little clever reverse engineering, one could go and request through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request the permit that was issued to that entity responsible for the weather Modification. Or, one could attend the “public hearing” as outlined in #10 above and get that information as well, and probably protest the weather modification where, when and before it starts.

The point here is that instead of trying to convince people to believe something that in effect is hardly believable accept in classic science fiction movies and novels, why not just point to this law which allows it to happen in the first place. And while your at it, shouldn’t we be making citizens arrests for the bastards in government who are allowing these experimental geo-engineering dumps to happen in the first place?

Here is the law as set forth by the Texas Legislature on Weather manipulation and control:

CHAPTER 301. WEATHER MODIFICATION AND CONTROL

SUBCHAPTER A. GENERAL PROVISIONS SECTION 301.001 Definitions.

In this chapter:

(3) “Operation” means the performance of weather modification and control activities entered into for the purpose of producing or attempting to produce a certain modifying effect within one geographical area over one continuing time interval not exceeding four years.

(4) “Research and development” means theoretical analysis, exploration, experimentation, and the extension of investigative findings and theories of a scientific or technical nature into practical application for experimental and demonstration purposes, including the experimental production and testing of models, devices, equipment, materials, and processes.

(5) “Weather modification and control” means changing or controlling, or attempting to change or control, by artificial methods the natural development of atmospheric cloud forms or precipitation forms that occur in the troposphere.

(6) “Weather modification and control program” means the research, development, licensing, and permitting and other associated activities to be administered by the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation.

Section 301.112. Publication of Notice.

The notice of intention required under Section 301.110 must be published at least once a week for three consecutive weeks in a newspaper of general circulation in each county in which the operation is to be conducted.

(Source: http://www.license.state.tx.us/weather/weatherlaw.htm)

CHAPTER 302. WEATHER MODIFICATION AND CONTROL GRANT PROGRAM.

AGRICULTURE CODE

TITLE 9. WEATHER AND CLIMATE

CHAPTER 302. WEATHER MODIFICATION AND CONTROL GRANT PROGRAM

Sec. 302.001. FINDINGS. The legislature finds that weather modification and control activities may have a significant impact on Texas agriculture. The legislature further finds that the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation is the proper state agency to administer grants to political subdivisions for weather modification and control activities.

(Source: http://statutes.laws.com/texas/agriculture-code/title-9-weather-and-climate/chapter-302-weather-modification-and-control-grant-program)

Really? How could this possibly harm the environment? (pause for humorous repose…)

A recent public notice posting in the San Luis Obispo Tribune stated:

NOTICE OF INTENTION WEATHER MODIFICATION PROGRAM THE SANTA BARBARA COUNTY WATER AGENCY HEREBY GIVES NOTICE OF INTENTION TO CONDUCT A WEATHER MODIFICATION PROGRAM NATURE AND PURPOSE:

The purpose of the project is to increase rainfall to help alleviate deficiencies of water supplies in Santa Barbara County. Clouds would be seeded by the dispersal of Silver Iodide (AgI). Two possible modes of seeding, air based and ground based, would be used. LOCATION OF PURPOSE: Project operations could be conducted during the period between November 15 and April 15, for each year, 2011-2012 through 2015-2016. Airborne seeding operations would utilize air space over Santa Barbara County, portions of San Luis Obispo County as well as the Pacific Ocean immediately west of Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo Counties. Ground based seeding operations would be conducted from the Santa Ynez Mountains, the Casmalia Hills and the San Rafael Mountains. The target areas for seeding operations are the watersheds behind Cachuma and Gibraltar reservoirs on the Santa Ynez River as well as Twitchell reservoir on the Cuyama River. LICENSEE: The project would be operated and supervised by a licensed weather modification consultant.

(Source: http://www.sanluisobispo.com/classified-ads/ad/1669597)

Now, when I was first pulled aside and someone pointed to the sky and said, “look up” I was immediately taken in by these trails and the fact that I never noticed them before, as if they were just a natural part of the skyline. And, perhaps the reason for this past perception is that this aerial spraying and weather modification has been going on since before I was even conceived!

After that day, I noticed that in the movie “The Russians Are Coming The Russians Are Coming” which was released in 1966, there was a scene that just happened to show an airplane leaving a trail in the sky, and it was a persistent contrail if ever there was one. I was quite surprised to see this considering the date of the movie, and brushed it off as a normal contrail.

I realize know that this was nothing to be surprised at or to be brushed off!

Here is the Santa Barbara County website describing the history of its use of weather modification:

As early as 1948, Santa Barbara County has participated in weather modification activities in order to augment local water supplies. Weather conditions are “modified” by seeding clouds – cloud seeding – with condensation nuclei to increase the amount of rain that falls. There are a number of benefits from doing this, which are supported by statistical analysis. The most significant benefit is that in some years up to 20% more rain falls in areas where clouds have been seeded than in control (unseeded) areas. There are three distinct benefits of cloud seeding: infiltration of significant amounts of water into ground water basins; runoff into reservoirs; and irrigation effects on grasslands and crops.

(Source: http://www.countyofsb.org/pwd/pwwater.aspx?id=3740)

Then there is this letter from the Department of Water Resources in California:

May 4, 1964

Honorable Edmund G.. Brown, Governor
and Members of the Legislature of the
State of California

Gentlemen:

I have the honor to transmit herewith a report of the Department of Water Resources, entitled “Weather Modification Operations in California, October 1, I962 – September 30, I963.”

During the period covered by the report, there were ten projects Involving weather modification operations which were undertaken in California. These were accomplished by nine of the eleven operators who were licensed by the department for such activities…

{Report}

WEATHER MODIFICATION OPERATIONS IN CALIFORNIA
OCTOBER 1, 1962 – SEPTEMBER 30, I963

INTRODUCTION

This report presents a summary of all weather modification projects conducted in California during the period October 1, 1962, through September 30, 1963: as reported to the Department of Water Resources in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 4, Division 1 of the Water Code,

Appended to this report are the statutes on the regulation and control of natural precipitation by artificial means…

…No person, without first securing a license from the department, shall cause or attempt to cause condensation or precipitation of rain, snow, moisture, or water in any form contained in the atmosphere, or shall prevent or attempt
to prevent by artificial means the natural condensation or precipitation of rain, snow, moisture, or water in any form
contained in the atmosphere.”

On being Issued a license by the department, the licensee may operate projects in the areas and periods specified in the notices of Intention to modify natural precipitation by artificial means. These notices must be published by the licensee in newspapers having a general circulation and published In each county where the operation is to be conducted…

{Report continued…}

(Source: http://www.archive.org/stream/weathermodificat196263calirich/weathermodificat196263calirich_djvu.txt

Another public notice from 1965, in the Heppner Gazette Times reported:

NOTICE OF INTENTION TO MODIFY NATURAL PRECIPITATION BY ARTIFICIAL MEANS

Notice is hereby given that it is the intent of the Water Resources Development Corporation of 460 South Broadway, Denver 9, Colorado, which holds License No. 54 of the State of Oregon, to engage in operations to modify natural precipitation by artificial means, for and on behalf of MORROW COUNTY WEATHER RESEARCH ASSOCIATION, located at Echo. Oregon…

(Source: http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=kz5lAAAAIBAJ&sjid=j5MNAAAAIBAJ&pg=24 23%2C2247469)

And yet another public notice in The Intermountain News, October 16th, 1969:

NOTICE OF INTENTION TO MODIFY NATURAL PRECIPITATION BY ARTIFICIAL MEANS

Notice is hereby given that Pacific Gas and Electric Company, a California corporation… License No. 23 of the State of California to engage in operations to modify natural precipitation by artificial means, will for and on behalf of itself conduct a program of weather modification by artificial nucleation of clouds with silver iodide and other nucleating agents…

(Source: http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=xxglAAAAIBAJ&sjid=3w0GAAAAIBAJ&pg=2174%2C2220508)

So let’s stop pointing to the ever expanding, non-dispersing lines in the sky that everyone has nowadays virtually grown up with to try and prove that weather manipulation exists. If it were a snake it would bite them on the nose! Now you can simply point to over 70 years worth of cloud seeding and weather control by “artificial means” as listed in your own state governments and archives.

Now how can anybody deny that?

Credit for these links goes to this gentleman, for whom we should all post a big thank you on his web forum…

(Source: http://metabunk.org/threads/306-Debunked-quot-Notice-of-intent-to-perform-weather-modification-quot)

And to Hal Anthony, who always expands my horizons.

Here are some other interesting stories and laws about cloud seeding:

“The National Weather Modification Policy Act of 1976”, federally codified here:

US CODE: TITLE 15 CHAPTER 9A – WEATHER MODIFICATION ACTIVITIES OR ATTEMPTS; REPORTING REQUIREMENT

(Source: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode15/usc_sup_01_15_10_9A.html)

Oregon Statutes – Chapter 558 – Weather Modification

(Source: http://law.onecle.com/oregon/558-weather-modification/index.html)

“The Russian Air Force, during a mission to clear the skies of potentially rain-filled clouds, dropped a mixture of silver iodide, liquid nitrogen and cement powder in an attempt to seed the clouds. This form of climate modification is common practice in Russia, when attempting to engineer dry days on public holidays and special events in Moscow…”

(Source: http://www.universetoday.com/15189/when-cloud-seeding-goes-wrong-cement-chunk-falls-from-the-sky/)

China overdoes cloud seeding to end drought… and blankets Beijing in snow…

(Source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1224475/China-overdoes-cloud-seeding-end-drought–blankets-Beijing-snow.html)

The Chinese “Weather Manipulation Missle” at Olympic

(Source: http://www.universetoday.com/16728/the-chinese-weather-manipulation-missile-olympics/)

Planned and Inadvertent Weather Modification/Weather Modification Association

Japanese Cloud Seeding Experiments for Precipitation Augmentation (JCSEPA)
Masataka Murakami, MRI, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan

In some populated areas of central and western Japan, they have recently had a potential problem of water shortage. For the last twenty years, they have had the problem of water shortage almost every two or three years.

MRI, in cooperation with 10 other research organizations, has launched the five-year research project (2006-2011) “Japanese Cloud Seeding Experiments for Precipitation Augmentation (JCSEPA)” to aim drought mitigation and water resources management.

(Source: http://ams.confex.com/ams/17WModWMA/techprogram/paper_139160.htm)

Now mom – tell me I’m crazy one more time…

Didn’t think so!

–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Friday, November 25, 2011

22 Comments

by realitybloger on November 25, 2011 • Permalink

Posted in Chemtrails and cloud seeding, Uncategorized

Tagged artificial clouds, changing the weather, chemtrails, clint richardson, cloud seeding, contrail, control of weather, geoengineering, making rain, sun dog, the corporation nation, weather experiments, weather manipulation, what in the world are they spraying

Posted by realitybloger on November 25, 2011

https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2011/11/25/geoengineering-and-cloud-seeding/

REALITY BLOG

All posts tagged what in the world are they spraying

Archons And Mind Parasites And Extremophiles, Oh My!

“Zombie Virus” Possible via Rabies-Flu Hybrid?

Highly improbable genetic tweak could create mutant virus.

Habitats of the archaea

Determinants of transcription initiation by archaeal RNA polymerase.

Transcription factor B contacts promoter DNA near the transcription start site of the archaeal transcription initiation complex.

Get the book! Click here:

Email Subscription

Help Clint stay out of business!

Most Popular Posts

Past Posts

Archives

Search Key Words

Is Anybody Out There?