The Four Pillars Of Fiction – Part 1: A Matter of Time


“The intuition of the moral sentiment is an insight of the perfection of the laws of the soul. These laws execute themselves. THEY ARE OUT OF TIME, OUT OF SPACE, and not subject to circumstance.”

—Ralph Waldo Emerson


As I progress further into the deeper realms of comprehension surrounding this strange fictional world built upon nothing but the legal matrix code of word magic, as if finally starting to see only the figurative, insubstantial code that makes up The Matrix as a legal (artificial) simulation in all its digital design and functionality, I wanted to share perhaps the singular element of this fictional construct that must falsely exist as a necessary foundation to support that whole maddening, artificial world. For behind the curtain of the wizard we do not find any controls or magic artifacts to govern the planet and its inhabitants. Instead, we find merely a Roman calendar dating from zero into infinitum — from the beginning (zero point) of this artful, legal creation story of a time-released world of nothingness to an as of yet empty, future timeline without end.

The element of recorded time is the quintessential element in the legal, fictional world. Without it, fiction could have no artificial life. But isn’t that an oxymoron? Just what is fictional life, one might ask? Is it artificial intelligence? Hardly. For the insubstantial life-forms (persons) existing in the legal system run only on the words of a contract. And the foundation of any contract is nothing more or less than a matter of time. To be clear, all dis-ease is contracted.

LIFE – noun – Plural lives. [See Live.] …4. The present state of existence; the time from birth to death. The life of man seldom exceeds seventy years… 12. Exact resemblance; with to… 14. Condition; rank in society; as high life and low life… 25. A quickening, animating and strengthening principle, in a moral sense. John 6:27. 26. The state of being in force, or the term for which an instrument has legal operation; as the life of an execution. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)


Here we find that the life (registered and recognized status) of a legally created person, place, or thing (noun/name), is defined by the time-based, artificial life (execution) of its time-based contract, thus showing the need for a death certificate (proof of execution/civil death).

The enfranchising birth of a contract created for any man, called the birth certificate, has legal life as a person only until the death of the man animating it, giving it fictional life as a puppet-master gives pretended life to a dead puppet. This period of contract is of course a calendric, time-based, artificial existence, as the life of a citizen (fictional status/persona). It is this recorded imagery of the dimension of passing time, point A to point B, that simulates the passing of fictional existence, and thus of a pre-tended life. Without this control over time, no fictional life can be shown or “proven” to exist.

What is a lease, for instance, but a timed event; a specifically relegated time period for the artificial life of a contract to be executed? What is a citizenship, therefore, but a contract for the life of a person (status), which exists only as long as some fool of a man may choose to animate (be surety for) that dead entity? In the Bible, these “observers of times” were compared to witches, sorcerers, enchanters, and diviners (augers). For only the written, legalistic laws of man, as opposed to the timeless Law of God’s (as Jehovah’s) unchanging Nature, bear any relation to the keeping track of and thus observing of the formal element of time.


“Ye shall not eat any thing with the blood: neither shall ye use enchantment, NOR OBSERVE TIMES.

-Leviticus 19:26, KJV


“There shall not be found among you any one that maketh his son or his daughter to pass through the fire, or that useth divination, OR AN OBSERVER OF TIMES, or an enchanter, or a witch… For these nations, which thou shalt possess, hearkened unto OBSERVERS OF TIMES, and unto diviners: but as for thee, the LORD thy God hath NOT suffered thee so to do.

–Deuteronomy 18: 10, 14, KJV


In searching for the meaning of this term “observer of times,” we find the following:

OBSERVERS OF TIMES – KJV term for a soothsayer (Deuteronomy 18:10, Deuteronomy 18:10, 18:14; compare Leviticus 19:262 Kings 21:6;  2 Chronicles 33:6). See: Divination and Magic. (Concordance, Thompson Chain Reference, Holman Bible Dictionary)

SOOTHSAYING –noun – The foretelling of future events by persons without divine aid or authority, and thus distinguished from prophecy. (Webster’s 1828)

CHRONOGRAM –noun – An inscription in which a certain date or epoch is expressed by numeral letters; as in the motto of a medal struck by Gustavus Adolphus in 1632. (Webster’s 1828)

EPOCH – noun – [Latin epocha; Gr. retention, delay, stop, to inhibit; to hold.1. In chronology, a fixed point of time, from which succeeding years are numbered; a point from which computation of years begins. The Exodus of the Israelites from Egypt, and the Babylonish captivity, are remarkable epochs in their history. 2. Any fixed time or period; the period when any thing begins or is remarkably prevalent; as the epoch of falsehood; the epoch of woe. The fifteenth century was the unhappy epoch of military establishments in time of peace.


Here is an important video lesson on this word Epoch, especially and unintentionally regarding the coming AI (Artificial Intelligence) emerging from its own birth (epoch) by man:

Quotes from the video:

1. Each calendar era starts from an arbitrary epoch, which is often chosen to commemorate an important historical or mythological event.

2. North Korea uses a (calendar) system that starts in 1912, the year of the birth of their founder Kim Il-sung.

3. The epoch of the Addo Domini calendar is the incarnation of Jesus.

(Author’s Note: Anno Domini — (is) used to indicate that a time division falls within the Christian ERA. Merriem-Webster Dictionary online)

4. In Israel, the traditional Hebrew calendar, using an era dating FROM CREATION, is the official calendar. However, the Gregorian calendar is the de facto (not of law but of fact/illegitimate) calendar and is commonly used. Government documents usually display a duel date.

5. (In) computing, the time kept internally by a computer system is usually expressed by the number of tiny units that have elapsed since a specified epoch

6. When times prior to the epoch need to be represented, it is common to use the same system, but with negative numbers. These representations of time are mainly for internal use. If an end-user interaction with dates and times is required, the software will nearly always convert this internal number into a date and time representation that is comprehensible to humans


It is fascinating to suppose that the keeping of time for man is not dissimilar to what is historically considered to be ancient man’s (i.e. caveman’s) keeping of fire. It is of course unnatural and indeed impossible in every way to keep a torch burning without constantly adding new fuel to the controlled fire. Fire is by its very Nature and design quite uncontrollable when unleashed upon a constant source of burnable fuel. Likewise, man is the only keeper and holder of time of all Creatures in Nature. Just as the carrying of that controlled burn upon a wooden torch represents the epoch of some past, uncontrolled fire, the end or boring out of that torch will also represent the end of that era of an artificially induced epoch. Like the birth of Jesus the Christos, the torch is merely a representation of time between the present fire and its epoch (birth/ignition). The very representational time-keeping clocks, watches, and digital displays we so arrogantly display and take for granted are merely a torch we carry to represent whatever epoch those digits or hands of the clock display — in our case, the birth of Jesus (the personification of the New Testament — The Law of Nature and man’s Covenant with God). Like it or not, all modern timepieces are merely representations of the controlled time units created by men to artificially track the epoch of the birth of Jesus the Christos (Annointed). For while God (Jehovah) is timeless, your watch is but a tool of the false, legally titled “Christians” of Rome and their modern technologies (art forms).

A time-keeping device is literally an artistic, representational painting of some point in time. It is ever-changing, and the time it displays is ever dying and forever reborn, for only the present Reality can ever actually be displayed, no matter what those artful hands or digital numerals pretend to express. In other words, when man alters or changes his clock, this useless action has no bearing on Reality. Man simply cannot alter the passing of time with his false, detached representations of it. It is a creation and devise of men, and its false existence and record-keeping will die when men do. For the time-keeper must manually wind, plug-in, or otherwise power such time-keeping machines without end to give them artificial life, just like the torch, even as the timeless Creation of God passes by so carelessly in consideration of he who sees only the time displayed by men, yet never stops to ponder that wonder and beauty of which his time-art can only coldly, falsely display. Man can never actually keep time, for the very second he realizes and actualizes it in the present, it is already past.

We are not ever Truly bound by time, for we are part of the timeless Creation of Nature (God), and through the passing of our inheritable blood and cell memory we never (spiritually) die. We can not possibly have nor physically remember any birth date without the artifices of man’s technologies (art forms) keeping track of such a useless information, which, of course, is not of the substance of Nature. “Years” simply don’t actually exist in Nature. We are not born into time, we are born into the timeless Nature that surpasses such limited constructs and limitations of man’s imagination and technology.

But to be legally controlled, our very Existence must be falsified, for what is legal is what is anti-Nature, anti-God, and adversarial to the Law and Laws of Nature (God).

We must be chronicled in time.

Like time, the eternal events of our Real Lives must be “kept” and recorded so that fiction may have artificial life in the time dimension – the dead life and execution of a contract.

CHRONICCHRONICLE – adjective – Continuing a long time, as a disease.chronic disease is one which is inveterate or of long continuance, in distinction from an acute disease, which speedily terminates. (–Webster’s 1828)

INVETERATE – adjective – [Latin inveteratus, invetero; in and vetero, from vetus, old.] 1. Old; long establishedIt is an inveterate and received opinion– 2. Deep rooted; firmly established by long continuance; obstinate; used of evils; as an inveterate disease; an inveterate abuse; an inveterate course of sin. 3. Having fixed habits by long continuance; used of PERSONS; as an inveterate sinner. 4. Violent; deep rooted; obstinate; as inveterate enmity or malice. – verb transitive – [Latin invetero, to grow old.] To fix and settle by long continuance. [Obsolete or little used.] (–Webster’s 1828)

CHRONICLE – noun – [See Chronic.] 1. A historical account of facts or EVENTS disposed IN THE ORDER OF TIME. It is nearly synonymous with annals. In general, this species of writing is more strictly confined to chronological order, and is less diffuse than the form of writing called history. 2. In a more general sense, a history. 3. That which contains history. Europe – her very ruins tell the history of times gone by, and every moldering stone is a chronicle. 4. Chronicles, plural – Two books of the Old Testament. –verb transitive – To record in history, or chronicle; to record; TO REGISTER. (–Webster’s 1828)

CHRONICLER – noun – A writer of a chronicle; a recorder of EVENTS in the order of time; a historian. (–Webster’s 1828)


Author’s note: a birth certificate (deed) is a chronicle of the event of the creation and thus epoch of the life of an artificial, legal entity based on the vital statistics of a Real man. A death certificate is the event where the implied contract of that legal entity ceases to have artificial, contractual life. The death certificate represents the execution of the legal entity, the end or fictional death of a contract. For without a man to use and drive it, a person/status is like a puppet without a master. A person/legal status cannot be transferred as the inheritable rights of blood relation/filiation can, for no contract is needed for recognition by law of the self-evident blood relation of heirs. Legal persons of government cannot inherit land because the life of that false persona/status dies when the man does, and one’s children are ineligible to receive any part of the property of that legal persona, requiring a will to be able to claim title only to any property of the person, but never True ownership (holding). Property only exists in legal fiction, and is only ever held my fictional persons. All of Nature is Truly the property of God, according to Law.

“KRONOS (Cronus) was the King of the Titanes and the god of time, in particular time when viewed as a destructive, all-devouring force.

He ruled the cosmos during the Golden Age after castrating and deposing his father Ouranos (Uranus, Sky). In fear of a prophecy that he would in turn be overthrown by his own son, Kronos swallowed each of his children as they were born. Rhea managed to save the youngest, Zeus, by hiding him away on the island of Krete (Crete), and fed Kronos a stone wrapped in swaddling clothes. The god grew up, forced Kronos to disgorge his swallowed offspring, and led the Olympians in a ten year war against the Titanes (Titans), driving them in defeat into the pit of Tartaros (Tartarus).

Many human generations later, Zeus released Kronos and his brothers from their prison, and made the old Titan king of the Elysian Islands, home of the blessed DEAD.

Kronos was essentially the same as Khronos (Chronos), the primordial god of time in the Orphic Theogonies.”



One might notice that this mythos is not so different than the one where Moses causes Pharaoh to “let my people go,” nor of the Biblical king that would have all first-born children killed (or swallowed alive). Copies of copied copies.

Let us continue our journey within this artificial currency of time by dissecting further the underpinnings of this false god of time, from the origins of Kronos (Chronos) himself, as well as the various timelines that men have created to express legally, artificially express it and how we have all been legally “swallowed up” by it’s fictional presence:

CHRONOGRAMMATICAL – adjective – Belonging to (i.e. property of) a chronogram, or containing one. (–Webster’s 1828)

CHRONOGRAM – noun – An inscription in which a certain date or epoch is expressed by numeral letters; as in the motto of a medal struck by Gustavus Adolphus in 1632. ChrIstVs DVX; ergo trIVMphVs(–Webster’s 1828)

CHOREOGRAPHER – noun – One who writes concerning time or the EVENTS of time; a chronologer. (–Webster’s 1828)

CHRONOGRAPHY – noun – The description of time past. (–Webster’s 1828)

CHRONOLOGIST – noun – [See Chronology.] – 1. A person who attempts to discover the true dates of past events and transactions, and to arrange them under their proper years, or divisions of time, in the order in which they happened. 2. One who studies chronology, or is versed in the science. (Webster’s 1828)

CHRONOLOGER, CHRONOLOGIC,  CHRONOLOGICAL – adjective – Relating to chronology; containing an account of events in the order of time; according to the ORDER OF TIME of time.

CHRONOLOGY – noun – The science of time; the method of measuring, or computing time by regular divisions or periods, according to the revolutions of the sun, or moon; of ascertaining the true periods or years when past events or transactions took place; and arranging them in their proper order according to their dates. If history without chronology is dark and confusedchronology without history is dry and insipid(Webster’s 1828)

A. 0. C.Anno orbis conditi, the year of the creation of the world.

A. P. C. N.Anno post Christum natum, the year after the birth of Christ.

A. P. R. C.Anno post Rortzan conditam, year after the foundation of Rome.

A. M.Ante meridiem, before noon. Only the abbreviation is ordinarily used. Also atrium magister, master of arts. Also annus mirabilisthe wonderful year – 1666, the year of the defeat of the Dutch fleet and of the great London fire. Also anno mundi, in the year of the world; that is, when the creation of the world is said to have taken place, 4004 B. C.

AB INITIO MUNDI – Latin. From the beginning of the world.

AB INITIO MUNDI USQUE AD HODIERNUM DIEM – From the beginning of the world to this day.


(Stalin was) a product of his epoch,” Putin recently told the director Oliver Stone. “It seems to me that excessive demonization of Stalin is one of the means of attacking the Soviet Union and Russia,” Putin said, speaking in the last installment of a four-part series of interviews, “to show that today’s Russia bears some kind of birthmarks of Stalinism.” We all have birthmarks of some kind—well, so what? Russia has changed fundamentally.”

–The Russian State’s Lost Birth Certificate, By Maxim Trudolyubov, as reported in “The Russia File,” a Kennan Institute Blog


The birth certificate process, as the creation of a fictional legal entity, the life of a contract, is the time-stamped epoch and inception of legal existence. It is a mark of inclusion upon the government’s chronological history of legal entities (persons). It fundamentally alters the course of men away from their Natural Being under God’s Nature and Law and into the artificial realm of controlled commerce, the currency of mammon, and the building up without reason or end of that fictional construct of corporate commerce — progress without any purpose other than to show historiographical growth of corporations (artificial persons) on paper within industry and municipal powers. Literally, there is and can be no end to economic growth. It’s a cancerous tumor, and what is a cancer without fulfillment of its eternal purpose (pointless growth). All governments are corporations (artificial persons), and there is only ever two directions — either growth or insolvency — in the fictional “corporate world.” A corporation cannot exist without showing growth in its artificially contracted timeline. Growth and expansion is a corporation’s very purpose, in order to fulfill the greed of its stock and shareholders. It can be no other way in mammon, until eventually this purposefully cancerous growth must destroy not only its host but its epoch of purpose. In other words, the life of a corporation (artificial person) is the execution of its contract (compact), a fulfillment of its articles of incorporation. What is birthed by contract must also die under contract. This is a maxim (principle) of law:


“Nothing is so natural as to dissolve anything in the way in which it was bound together; therefore the obligation of words is taken away by words; the obligation of mere consent is dissolved by the contrary consent.”



And this brings us to some uncomfortable realizations. For we must also understand that no “people” exist until their time is set as an epoch and a name (noun) is officially applied to them as an incorporation of souls. Simply stated, there are no people, for a people and its name (noun) is always a creation of man, and depends absolutely on man’s time-based mechanisms of chronological history. A people, and the fact that there are different peoples (and legal sets of law to go with them), is purely a product of man’s imagination. Under God’s Law, within the Law of Nature, there is only one people. There is only men of God and Its Law and those adversarial to It. For all such titles and names for people and persons are purely the creations of men, as all words are.

EMERGENT YEARThe epoch or date whence any PEOPLE begin to compute their time. (Black’s Law 4rth Edition)

EPOCH – The time at which a new computation is begun; the time whence dates are numbered. Enc. Lond. (Black’s Law 4rth Edition)

GREGORIAN EPOCH – The time from which the Gregorian calendar or computation dates; i. e., from the year 1582. (Black’s Law 4rth Edition)

GREGORIAN CODEThe code or collection of constitutions made by the Roman jurist Gregarious. See Codex Gregorianus. (Black’s Law 4rth Edition)

OLYMPIADA Grecian epoch; the space of four years(Black’s Law 4rth Edition)


Yes, we are indeed placed upon the Roman calendar in the legal (artificial) realm, under the Roman (strict), positive legal law. We celebrate the olympics every four years. And we even go to Romanesque colosseums to watch sports and cheer on their organized violence and blood-shed. The only difference is that now we give thumbs up or down through our computers and cellphones like a hive-minded collective of nitwits as we watch such events on the boob-tube. We are, for all intents and purposes, doing as the Romans did before their empire was shattered by its own moral bankruptcy. And in the ultimate irony, we have even abandoned our republics (States) for central federalism and democracy, just like then. And worst of all, we worship free-masonic constitutions as our false idols, as god-like law-givers written by the most unscrupulous of slave-holding men.

But none of this would mean anything, universally speaking, if we weren’t all placed upon the same “civil” calendar of the mythical Gregorian god and his codex.

And we are not the only ones…


Constitution of Pakistan:

Article 262: Gregorian calendar to be used

262. Gregorian calendar to be used. (1) For the purposes of the Constitution, periods of TIME shall be reckoned according to the Gregorian calendar.

–Leading & Latest Cases on Article 262 of the Constitution of Pakistan, 1973


“George Washington was born in Virginia on February 11, 1731, according to the then-used Julian calendar. In 1752, however, Britain and ALL ITS COLONIES ADOPTED the Gregorian calendar which moved Washington’s birthday a year and 11 days to February 22, 1732.

Here we see that Washington’s Julian Based birth date was legally changed to be an official holiday in the official civil or Gregorian calendar, but with a whole year and 11 days difference between the two calendars.

Yet both of these dates are merely legal fictions. Remember, there are no actual dates (events/history), the constructs of man, in the timeless Reality and Law of God’s Nature…



Here we see the inscription over the Bevis Marks Synagogue, City of London,
which gives the year 5461 in Annu Mundi and 1701 in civil calendar dating.


HEGIRAThe epoch or account of time used by the Arabians and the Turks, who begin the Mohammedan era and computation from the day that Mohammed was compelled to escape from Mecca to Medina which happened on the night of Thursday, July 15, A.D. 622, under the reign of the Emperor Heraclius. Townsend, Dict. Dates; Wilson, Gloss. The era begins July 16. The word is sometimes spelled hejira but the former is the ordinary usage. It is derived from hijrah, in one form or another, an oriental term denoting flight, departure. The flight of Mohammed from Mecca. Webster, Dict. (Black’s Law 4rth Edition)

CALENDSAmong the Romans the first day of every month, being spoken of by itself, or the very day of the new moon, which usually happen together.

CALENDS, GREEK – A metaphorical expression for a time never likely to arrive, inasmuch as the Greeks had no calends.

CODEA collection, compendium or revision of laws. A complete system of positive law, scientifically arranged, and promulgated by legislative authority. Any systematic body of law. A “Code” implies compilation of existing laws, systematic arrangement into chapters, subheads, table: of contents, and index, and revision to harmonize conflicts, supply omissions, and generally clarify and make complete body of laws designed to regulate completely subjects to which they relate. The collection of laws and constitutions made by order of the Emperor Justinian is distinguished by the appellation of “The Code,” by way of eminence. See Code of Justinian. A code is to be distinguished from a digest. Digests of statutes consist of a collection of existing statutes, while a code is promulgated as one new law covering the whole field of jurisprudence. Code civil. The code which embodies the civil law of France. It was promulgated in 1801. When Napoleon became emperor, the name was changed to “Code Napoleon.” by which it is still often designated, though it is now officially styled by its original name of “Code Civil.” Code de commerce. A French code, enacted in 1807, as a supplement to the Code Napoleon, regulating commercial transactions, the laws of business, bankruptcies, and the jurisdiction and procedure of the courts dealing with these subjects. Code de procddure civil. That part of the Code Napoleon which regulates the system of courts, their organization, civil procedure, speclal and extraordinary remedies, and the execution of judgments. Code d’instruction criminelle. A French code, enacted In 1808, regulating crimlnal procedure. Code Napoldon. See Code ~ b l . Code noir. Fr. The black code. A body of laws which formerly regulated the lnstitutlon of slavery In the French colonies. Code of Justinian. The Code of Justinian Codex Justinianeus was a collectlon of imperial constitutions, compiled, by order of that emperor, by a commission, and promulgated A. D. 529. It comprised twelve books, and was the flrst of the four compilations of law which make up the Corpus Juris Civilis. This name Is often met in a connection indicating that the entire Corpus Juris Civilis is intended, or, sometimes, the Digest; but its use should be conflned to the Codex. Code penal. The penal or criminal code of France, enacted in 1810.

CODEX – Latin. A code or collection of laws; particularly the Code of Justinian. Also a roll or volume, and a book written on paper or parchment.

CODEX GREGORIAN – A collection of imperial constitutions made by Gregorius,  a Roman jurist of the fifth century, about the middle of the century. It contained the constitutions from Hadrian down to Constantine.

CODEX HERMOGENIANUS – A collection of imperial constitutions made by Hermogenes, a jurist of the fifth century. It was nothing more than a supplement to the Codex Gregorianus, (supra,) containing the constitutions of Diocletian and Maximilian.

CODEX JUSTINIANEUS – A collection of imperial constitutions, made by a commission of ten persons appointed by Justinian, A.D. 528.

CODEX REPETITLE PRLELECTIONIS – The new code of Justinian; or the new edition of the first or old code, promulgated A.D. 534, being the one now extant.

CODEX THEODOSIANUS – A code compiled by the emperor Theodosius the younger, A.D. 438. It was a collection of all the imperial constitutions then in force. It was the only body of civil law publicly received as authentic in the western part of Europe till the twelfth century, the use and authority of the Code of Justinian being during that interval confined to the East.

CODEX VETUSThe old code. The first edition of the Code of Justinian; NOW LOST.


By this last definition, all others are made illegitimate, as is the very code thereof. For this means that the so-called Code of Justinian that is still in use today is but a simulacrum — a copy without an original. Its epoch, its very creation and construction is lost to history, and thus cannot be proven. That which has no beginning really has no existence. Just as The Matrix simulation is a simulacrum of the old bustling cities now destroyed and thus lost to any Real representational sameness, that “Desert of the Real” stands only in ruination, with no Real source for that simulated world to verify its accuracy therefrom. The law, the codex of imperial constitutions that our congress worships as one of its lawgivers even today, stands in its entirety as an unverifiable copy of what once existed and was then destroyed, and that is if it’s original form even existed at all!

Of course, when one seeks, one finds that even these mythological characters as “Justinian” appear to be merely the fabrications of men’s mythos – false gods that created such historical epochs of constitutional law. But perhaps most frightening to this legal mythology is that, in the United States congressional hall, we find just out of sight of their constantly televised sessions the very epochal gods they truly worship (see below).

Likewise, in America, we have the delusional mythos of our own historical epoch as a “people” of this nation, that being the archetypal “Founding Fathers.” Yet somehow it is overlooked that this collaborative meeting of verifiable freemasons were not merely the next-in-line creators of the same old Gregorian (civil) constitutions of old. They merely rebranded imperialism. Strangely enough, America is the only nation of people that actually celebrate and even worship this founding document as a paper god, calling it “the constitution” as if no other nation had one or that it was somehow different in its origin and intent than all other masonic archetypes. Perhaps its word-trickery is superior to all others, but not its purpose or the intention of its authors to make subjects out of all men.

Remember, it’s not your religion that matters, it’s theirs. While under their system with them as gods (magistrates) one is legally contracted (re-created in persona) under their law and false-religion. It’s their (legal/positive) law and it comes from their gods. This, again, is why the Bible warns you to take no gods before the God of Nature (Reality), and especially to call no man as your Father.

Now, it’s important to note here just which historical characters in the timeline of calendric mythology the U.S. Congress actually worship behind closed doors… right? Shouldn’t we seek to find just whom this band of organized criminals worship as their gods (lawmakers), if only to understand the epoch of our entire legal system and its imperially constituted structure?

Well I’ve got news for you…

The likeness (bust) of Hammurabi is hanging in the Congressional hall along with all other law-givers which they consider as their different gods (lawgivers). Amazingly, and very tellingly, Jesus Christ is certainly not one of those law-givers, for Jesus (a personification representing the New Testament Law of Nature/Jehovah) and stands only ever opposed to any of man’s created laws and constitutional imperialism. Government is, of course, always anti-christ (in the stead of God’s Law) in its constituted, commercial law of mammon.

For your information, these actually worshiped, anointed gods (lawmakers) that are hanging in the congressional hall well out of sight of the public view, eerily watching over the various sessions of these modern, corrupt lawmakers, are as follows:

“George Mason, Robert Joseph Pothier, Jean Baptiste Colbert, Edward I, Alfonso X, Gregory IX, Saint Louis, Justinian I, Tribonian, Lycurgus, Hammurabi, Moses, Solon, Papinian, Gaius, Maimonides, Suleiman, Innocent III, Simon de Montfort, Hugo Grotius, Sir William Blackstone, Napoleon I, and Thomas Jefferson.”

“The (above) Relief Portraits of Lawgivers are located in the House Chamber of the U.S. Capitol Building. The 23 marble relief portraits over the gallery doors of the House Chamber in the U.S. Capitol depict historical figures noted for their work IN ESTABLISHING THE PRINCIPLES THAT UNDERLIE AMERICAN LAW. They were installed when the chamber was remodeled in 1949-1950.

—Architect of the Capital website –


Because it may have happened in history does not make it right, or lawful, or romantic.

That is, unless you pretend to be the bloodline descendants of such mythical figures and worship them as your forefathers, and thus the Fathers (gods) of the legalistic (artificial) law in the stead of (anti) the only True Law of God’s Nature.

Let’s take just one example of these fabled lawmakers that the United States congress worships, so that we can understand the purely mythological nature of such law-givers respected by this conclave of organized criminals:

The “Code of Hammurabi” was apparently compiled in apparently 1780 B.C. It was based on the Babylonian law and gods called Anunaki:

Hammurabi’s Code of Laws

Translated by L. W. King

When Anu the Sublime, King of the Anunaki, and Bel, the lord of Heaven and earth, who decreed the fate of the land, assigned to Marduk, the over-ruling son of Ea, God of righteousness, dominion over earthly man, and made him great among the Igigi, they called Babylon by his illustrious name, made it great on earth, and founded an everlasting kingdom in it, whose foundations are laid so solidly as those of heaven and earth; then Anu and Bel called by name me, Hammurabi, the exalted prince, who feared God, to bring about the rule of righteousness in the land, to destroy the wicked and the evil-doers; so that the strong should not harm the weak; so that I should rule over the black-headed people like Shamash, and enlighten the land, to further the well-being of mankind.

Hammurabi, the prince, called of Bel am I, making riches and increase, enriching Nippur and Dur-ilu beyond compare… the sublime prince, who makes the face of Ninni shine; who presents holy meals to the divinity of Nin-a-zu, who cared for its inhabitants in their need, provided a portion for them in Babylon in peace; the shepherd of the oppressed and of the slaves; whose deeds find favor before Anunit, who provided for Anunit in the temple of Dumash in the suburb of Agade; who recognizes the right, who rules by law; who gave back to the city of Ashur its protecting god; who let the name of Ishtar of Nineveh remain in E-mish-mish; the Sublime, who humbles himself before the great gods; successor of Sumula-il; the mighty son of Sin-muballit; the royal scion of Eternity; the mighty monarch, the sun of Babylon, whose rays shed light over the land of Sumer and Akkad; the king, obeyed by the four quarters of the world; Beloved of Ninni, am I.

When Marduk sent me to rule over men, to give the protection of right to the land, I did right and righteousness in…, and brought about the well-being of the oppressed.


How does it feel to know that your congress respects and worships this dude as the very oldest epoch upon of its list of lawgivers?

And just where do these gods Marduk and Bel come from according to the Bible?

MERODACHDeath; slaughter, the name of a Babylonian god, probably the planet Mars (Jer 50:2), or it may be another name of Bel, the guardian divinity of Babylon. This name frequently occurs as a surname to the kings of Assyria and Babylon. (Easton’s Bible Dictionary)

BEL (BAAL) Baal Lord. 1. The name appropriated to the principal male god of the Phoenicians. It is found in several places in the plural BAALIM (Judges 2:11; 10:10; 1 Kings 18:18; Jeremiah 2:23; Hosea 2:17). Baal is identified with Molech (Jeremiah 19:5). It was known to the Israelites as Baal-peor (Numbers 25:3; Deuteronomy 4:3), was worshipped till the time of Samuel (1 Sam 7:4), and was afterwards the religion of the ten tribes in the time of Ahab (1 Kings 16:31-33; 18:19, 22). It prevailed also for a time in the kingdom of Judah (2 Kings 8:27; comp. 11:18; 16:3; 2 Chronicles 28:2), till finally put an end to by the severe discipline of the Captivity (Zephaniah 1:4-6). The priests of Baal were in great numbers (1 Kings 18:19), and of various classes (2 Kings 10:19). Their mode of offering sacrifices is described in 1 Kings 18:25-29. The sun-god, under the general title of Baal, or lord,” was the chief object of worship of THE CANAANITES. Each locality had its special Baal, and the various local Baals were summed up under the name of Baalim, or lords.” Each Baal had a wife, who was a colourless reflection of himself(Easton’s Bible Dictionary)


Sound familiar? The representative land-lords called congress call this mythical figure as one of their gods (lawgivers). This should be disconcerting even to the most loyal of brainwashed constitutionalists suffering from this legalistic Stockholm Syndrome, that worship these modern Baal worshipers as their lords and apparent legal saviors.

Many of these historical (and very likely fictional) figurines were supposedly from pre-Christian and pre-Biblical times. Some are former Popes (i.e. emperors) of the Roman Catholic Church and its Empire. There are even a couple of the “Founding Fathers” of the United States constitution thrown in there for good measure, the very bloodline of this modern Congress, this congregation of lords. But all of these gods are worshiped as purely a justification for the currently enforced Roman (positive/strict) legal (anti-God) law by this current body of law-giving land-lords than for the actual laws they once may have given.

Nothing to see here… go back to your commercial function. American Idol starts in 666 minutes. God forbid you should learn the origins of the civil (non-moral) law that governs you and consumes your very soul.

Of course, the timeline of the United States of America begins at its own special epoch as well, when a piece of paper was signed and made the “law of the (fictional) land.” Just as all incorporated cities, counties, and states have standing only as legally invented municipal corporations, it was upon its epoch of time-based (contractual) existence that the United States was placed into the Roman calendar as a new incorporation within that fictional timeline of men. And suddenly, apparently, somehow, “We, the People” were birthed into a fictional (legal), time-based existence. What did not exist before was suddenly made to have contractual, collective life — E Pluribus Unum style.

EPOCAL – ep·och·al /ˈepəkəl/ – adjective – 1. FORMING or characterizing an epoch; epoch-making. (–Oxford Dictionary Online)

ARCHETYPAL – adjective – Original; CONSTITUTING a model or pattern. (–Webster’s 1828)

ARCHETYPE – noun – [Gr. beginning, and form.] 1. The original pattern or model of a work; or the model from which a thing is made; as, a tree is the archetype or pattern of our idea of that tree. 2. Among minters, the standard weight, by which others are adjusted3. Among Platonists, the archetypal world is the world as it existed in the IDEA OF GOD, BEFORE THE CREATION. (–Webster’s 1828)


To be clear, there is no such thing as “a People,” without the consideration of a pretended, inceptive historiographical timeline of that people. A people is not born (Created by God) into Nature. A people is fictionally established at a single point or epoch in calendric time. Without recorded time, no people can exist, for no man is born as a plural entity. No man is born into God’s Nature as an “American.” An American is a fictional title (noun/name) given at the fictional birth of an fictional legal entity. It just isn’t Real. Every State and nation must have a starting point and thus a history to pretend its existence. Without such an epoch of emergence, no people have ever simply existed in self-evidence, for each men is only ever born of Nature (God), as the True Self. People is simply not a term of Nature, for no single man can physically be born as a people (plural). A people must be formed by men at some point in time, as his-story, and then only when the lie of Self-confirmation happens at some age of consent. But without such a formal declaration and recording of this inception (artificial birth) as the epoch (beginning) of a people, there can be no reason or Natural way for such a people to exist. Thus we find within most groups of men tricked into the nations of goyim (public citizen-ships), most of us are merely leftovers without connection to any purpose of its original epoch, figuratively existing in and under the empty name of some “people” as merely an empty flattery of title and false identity (nationalism), whose True origin of emergence was either long ago forgotten or made obsolete by the modernized legalities of its descendants.

Notice that even Webster never pretends that any single man is a people, and that only the legal persona (mask) of fictional status in that society is part of this people. For a people is generally nothing more or less than the population of a state or nation that speak the national language (ethnicity). Let us see what it was that those elitist constitutors of law really thought about the general population back in 1928:

PEOPLE – noun [Latin populous.] 1. The body of PERSONS who compose a community, town, city or nation. We say, the people of a town; the people of London or Paris; the English people. In this sense, the word is not used in the plural, but it comprehends all classes of inhabitants, considered as a collective body, or any portion of the inhabitants of a city or country2. The vulgar; the mass of illiterate persons. The knowing artist may judge better than the people. 3. The commonalty, as distinct from men of rankMyself shall mount the rostrum in his favor, And strive to gain his pardon from the people. 4. Persons of a particular class; a part of a nation or community; as country people. 5. Persons in general; any persons indefinitely; like on in French, and man in Saxon. People were tempted to lend by great premiums and large interest. 6. A collection or community of ANIMALS. The ants are a people not strong, yet they prepare their meat in the summer. Proverbs 30:257. When people signified a separate nation or tribe, it has the plural number. Thou must prophesy again before many peoples. Revelation 10:11. 8. In Scripture, fathers or kindred. Genesis 25:89. THE GENTILES. –To him shall the gathering of the people be. Genesis 49:10. – verb transitive – To stock with inhabitants. Emigrants from Europe have PEOPLED the United States(–Webster’s 1828)

GENERAL – noun – The whole; the total; that which comprehends all or the chief part; opposed to particularIn particulars our knowledge begins, and so spreads itself by degrees to generals. A history painter paints man in general. 1. In general in the main; for the most part; not always or universally. I have shown that he excels, in general under each of these heads… 7. The public; the interest of the whole; the VULGAR. [Not in use.] (–Webster’s 1828)

POPULOUS – adjective – [Latin populosus.] Full of inhabitants; containing many inhabitants in proportion to the extent of the country. A territory containing fifteen or twenty inhabitants to a square mile is not a populous country. The Netherlands, and some parts of Italy, containing a hundred and fifty inhabitants to a square mile, are deemed populous. (–Webster’s 1828)

POPULATION – noun – The act or operation of PEOPLING or FURNISHING with inhabitants; multiplication of inhabitants. The value of our western lands is annually enhanced by population. 1. The whole number of people or inhabitants in a country. The population of England is estimated at ten millions of souls; that of the United States in 1823, was ten millions. A country may have a great population and yet not be populous. 2. The state of a country with regard to its number of inhabitants, or rather with regard to its numbers compared with their expenses, consumption of goods and productions, and earnings. Neither is the population to be reckoned only by number; for a smaller number that spend more and earn less, do wear out an estate sooner than a greater number that live lower and gather more(–Webster’s 1828)

HEATHEN – noun – [Gr. from heath, that is, one who lives in the country or woods, as pagan from pagus, a village.] 1. A pagan; a Gentile; one who worships idols, or is unacquainted with the true God. In the Scriptures, the word seems to comprehend all nations except the Jews or Israelites, as they were all strangers to the true religion, and all addicted to idolatry. The word may now be applied perhaps to all nations, except to Christians and Mohammedans. Heathen, without the plural termination, is used plurally or collectively, for Gentiles or heathen nations. Ask of me, and I will give thee the heathen for thine inheritance. Psalms 2:8. Heathen, however, has a plural, expressing two or more individuals. If men have reason to be heathens in Japan– The precepts and examples of the ancient heathens. 2. A rude, illiterate, barbarous person. – adjective – Gentile, pagan; as a heathen author(–Webster’s 1828)


Bottom line, you are not the People… unless you enjoy being called what they define as a single body (corporation) of illiterate, vulgar animals. The collective corporation called “the People,” capitalized, however, is what sues you in court. The People is the State. The people is a fictional, legal creation of some epoch in time. A people is a product only of some romanticized history that is and cannot under the Laws of Nature be True. It simply does not exist in Nature (Reality). To be part of a people requires one and only one thing of the common goyim… the ego. For the ego enforces the id, and the id is birthed into a legal id-entity, a fictional persona (mask) of citizenship and subjection.

The people is a dead entity unless men act the part of its subjected personas (masks). The people can do nothing without men pretending to be that entitled “people,” glorifying themselves by that purely flattering and ultimately insubstantial title.

Form without substance…

And as for the common, public citizenships of the United States, called as the common people, you have just been told what you really are — just like cattle and other live-stock, your grandparents were peopled onto this plantation (farm/colony) Americana.

COLONY – noun – 1. A company or body of people transplanted from their mother country to a remote province or country to cultivate and inhabit it, and remaining subject to the jurisdiction of the parent state; as the British colonies in America or the Indies; the Spanish colonies in South America. When such settlements cease to be subject to the parent state, they are no longer denominated colonies. The first settles of New England were the best of Englishmen, well educated, devout Christians, and zealous lovers of liberty. There was never a colony formed of better materials. 2. The country planted or colonized; a plantation; also, the body of inhabitants in a territory colonized, including the descendants of the first planters. The people, though born in the territory, retain the name of colonists, till they cease to be subjects of the parent state3. A collection of animals; as colonies of shell-fish. (Webster’s 1828)

PLANTATION – noun – [Latin plantatio, from planto, to plant.1. The act of planting or setting in the earth for growth. 2. The place planted; applied to ground planted with trees, as an orchard or the like. 3. In the United States and the West Indies, a cultivated estate; A FARM. In the United States, this word is applied to an estate, a tract of land occupied and cultivated, in those states only where the labor is performed by slaves, and where the land is more or less appropriated to the culture of tobacco, rice, indigo and cotton, that is, from Maryland to Georgia inclusive, on the Atlantic, and in the western states where the land is appropriated to the same articles or to the culture of the sugar cane. From Maryland, northward and eastward, estates in land are called farms. 4. An original settlement in A NEW COUNTRY; A TOWN OR VILLAGE PLANTED.While these plantations were forming in Connecticut– 5. A COLONY. 6. A first planting; introduction; establishment; as the plantation of CHRISTIANITY in England. (Webster’s 1828)


Remember your perspective, my friends. Don’t forget just whom is creating and using such words, the gods of copyright and patent. For though you would never commonly utilize the language in this legalistic way anymore than a dog would use the language of its master, your slave-masters (lords) certainly do when speaking of you as the beasts of burden you are considered to be. Get over it, and quick, lest you remain always in the perspective of the free-slaves peopled (enfranchised) into this nation.

Consider some cartoon character or other moving picture image set to frames, which, without the necessary technology, possesses no quality of simulated life or animation. This pretended motion is marked by time code for editing (administration), each still-shot frame receiving its own mark from the time domain. And when played back through a machine or computer, life appears to animate those otherwise dead pictures.

And so we find this artificial type of life as legal fiction being animated all throughout the artificial realm of the congressional gods, as persons, places, and things (nouns/titles/names) being commercially operated, bought, sold, and insured with each use of the now digital id-entity and almost cashless credit rating of each registered persona. The contractual life of each fictional, cartoon persona attached legally to every man in consensual surety is recorded as some occurrence in history, as events upon a timeline meticulously verified and timestamped for later reference and playback in court. Like a legalistic key to this alternative, commercial world, standing in non-existence as a mirror image of all Reality placed into a cartoonish legal name/noun only, we use our debit and credit cards, enter our license and insurance numbers, and sign our signatures on behalf of these dead, fictional personas as authorized agents upon the dotted line, never realizing that the dotted line actually says, repeated over and over, “authorized signature.”

As in life, size is only a matter of perception, and the trickery of the adversaries, these lords of fiction, lives everywhere in this legal realm. Even where you would never think to look…


AS_0AS_1AS_2Presto! The “dotted” line is revealed. The agent (man) signs in bond
and surety for the strawman (person), being the duly authorized
agent for service of process. We sign as if we were the fictional character, assuming its name and title as if it were our own. We pretend to live
vicariously as fictional entities in that fictional, legal realm,
where all our actions are time-stamped and recorded as history (his-story).


Certainly no mystery is ever valuable, and no wizard ever great, unless that which he wishes to cover in an open veil of prestigious secrecy and those men he wishes to deceive  may have the equal possibility of uncovering the source of that veil bound in trickery. The illusions of words and images are everywhere, hidden always in plain sight. For like the digital Matrix simulation, all fictional persons, places, and things are nothing but legal (artful) words on paper, which in turn are animated (personified) within the fictional construct by our usage of their fictional countenance. We sign on the person’s behalf, we pay its bills and manage its debts, and in turn it is administered by the courts, where the final bill of extortive sanction (punishment) is given to and paid by each of us acting as surety to that strawman entity (fictional persona). We answer by its name (noun) and do business as if we are it. We are birthed (time-stamped and certified) into its contractual life and we live within that spiritually dead existence until finally the expiration date (execution of contract) of that persona in contract can be verified by our own physical death, which is again time-stamped and registered by a death certificate — a chronological mark on the legal calendar. The legally, fictionally existing life of that performance contract of debt in persona is thus executed and extinguished, its purpose given solution (end of contract), as the fictional strawman dies in its ability to be animated and used as property. The life given to the puppet dies with the puppet master, even as our last breath reveals our own end of self-Existence in the Reality of Nature.


“The Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicles (BMV) is required to verify an applicant’s LEGAL PRESENCE in the United States.

–Condition for eligibility listed on Ohio DMV ( website 


Only fictional persons have legal life (presence) in a legal realm and jurisdiction (United States). These things don’t Exist in the timeless domain of Nature, of Reality.

And what is a signature but a stamp of one’s name, a time stamp, representing a moment upon man’s artificial, calendric timeline, creating some legal (fictional) “event” to have taken place and be recorded. What is a recorded event without time? What is a holiday without a date? What is a week without a calendar? And what is a contract without a beginning and ending in this time domain?

Let’s take an example most of us can relate to…

Imagine if you got a bill in the mail from the electric company. It states that the following dollar amount is owed. But now imagine that it had no due date upon it for payment. What would you do? Would you pay the bill before you die?

Not ironically, this is of course exactly how these tricksters created the notion of mortgages and credit cards. Without time debt is impossible to manage or sanction. The loan balance amount is divided up into single payments upon the calendar, making men slaves of time, living by the Roman calendar as they attempt to work and pay off their new debts scheduled and amortized every 30 or so days.

But imagine if no due date was listed?

What possible enforcement could such a corporate entity or governmental municipal corporation (artificial person) take towards collecting that debt? What date and time could they use to enforce an overdue payment? What does the term overdue even mean in the timeless realm of Nature, of Reality? How can anything be overdue without the artifice of time kept by men?

How about a ticket written by some officer (agent) of the law? These are really a notice to appear at some scheduled date and time in some artificial (legal) jurisdiction of some corporate commercial court building. How could you receive such a summons, or for that matter such an extortionist ticket to pay government a fine by exaction, without some time given for its status to change to “late” or “unpaid.” How can any debt be unpaid without being based in this legal matrix of artificially kept time?

The answer: it can’t.

And this is the mystery that binds the whole legal system together. Without time, man’s legal, commercial world would cease to exist, and all men would be debt-free. For without a beginning there can be no end. Without existence in the time domain, fiction has no life. And the law of fiction becomes useless and obsolete.


Maxims of Law:

“There can be no property in a corpse. A corpse cannot own property.” 

—Haynes case, 1614, 12 Co. Rep 112, from “Digest of Criminal Law” Stephen, 5th ed, 252, 2 Ea. P.C. 652 (England)


“Nothing can be demanded before the TIME when, by the nature of things, it can be paid.”



Remember, a mortgage is a dead (MORT-al) pledge (en-GAGE-ment.) It is not property in any True sense, for the dead cannot own property. In other words, no public citizenship of the United States (dead person) actually owns the rights of disposal of his or her property. A mortgage is a tenancy. And to be a tenant, one must be under some lord.

This may seem unreasonable and illogical on its face to those unfamiliar with the legal system and True meaning of the words in the Bible. But we must remember that we are speaking about the realm of fiction. Logic does not apply to fictional things. Logic cannot be applied to a Roadrunner and Wile E. Coyote cartoon or a speeding ticket (extortion). All fiction is in-deed spiritually dead. It must be animated by man. The dead cannot own property, and can only be property of another. For the dead hold no power of inheritance. The dead have no blood. It’s life is not Real, any more than a puppet controlled by its master can be said to actually Live in Reality, in Nature. The legalism of this word dead is therefore one that applies only to the domain of that which exists only in the fiction of man’s recorded time domain. All persons are dead (legally created) entities. The are forms of art; art forms without substance. Words on paper. A contract. And so the time domain is only the domain of the dead, not the Spiritual Being. God is Life. Legalism is death. It does not Exist (is not recorded) in Nature.

Time is an invention of man, not a Design of God (Jehovah). Time is merely a language of symbols created by man to better organize and master the domain of Nature. Time is neutral in this regard. It is not good or bad. It is only when fiction is applied to this neutral notion of trackable time that it becomes a tool of trickery and subterfuge. It is the foundation of man’s legal system of positive law, which otherwise can have no purpose or sanction. There is no warning without time to heed that warning, for instance. Thus he who controls the time domain controls the law of the dead, the legal matrix. The life of the dead exists only in this fictional time domain.

Sound crazy? Finding this hard to believe? Think Clint’s finally off his rocker? Remember, this is another language, a foreign language called legalese. It is not the language of the Living, but of the dead. And so we must know what it is to be dead — to be a man playing in the agency of a fictional character (strawman). Let’s examine not the author but the words he has chosen to employ (use). For to see from the perspective of one’s master and be able to speak and understand his language is to no longer be his slave. To escape this fiction and its death-grip upon you, you must first recognize how it is that you have been made legally, spiritually dead in the eyes of the state, so that you can no longer lay claim to God-given, unalienable, “Natural Rights.”

In the realm of the legal, trust not what you can see, for your eyes are always blind and your senses are drowning in a sea (Holy See) of nonsense. When in the cartoon realm (Rome), do as the cartoons (Romans) do. But first, understand that which Caesar (the district/nation) has rendered upon you.

CORPSEnoun – [Latin, a body.] The DEAD body of a HUMAN BEING(–Webster’s 1828)

DEAD – …8. Unemployed; useless; unprofitable. A man’s faculties may lie dead or his goods remain dead on his hands. So dead capital or stock is that which produces no profit…18. In a state of spiritual death; void of grace; lying under the power of sin. 19. Impotent; unable to procreate. 20. Decayed in grace. Thou hast a name that thou livest, and art dead. Revelation 3:1. 21. Not proceeding from spiritual life; not producing good works; as, faith without works is dead. James 2:17. 22. Proceeding from corrupt nature, not from spiritual life or a gracious principle; as dead works. Hebrews 9:14. 23. In law, cut off from the rights of a citizen: deprived of power of enjoying the rights of property; as one banished or becoming a monk is civilly dead(–Webster’s 1828)

MORTnoun – A tune sounded at the death of game. (–Webster’s 1828)

MORTMAIN noun – In law, possession of lands or tenements IN DEAD HANDS, or hands that cannot alienate. Alienation in mortmain is an alienation of lands or tenements to any corporation, sole or aggregate, ecclesiastical or temporal, particularly to religious houses, by which the estate becomes perpetually inherent in the corporation and unalienable. (–Webster’s 1828)

MORTGAGEnoun – mor’gage. 1. Literally, a dead pledge; the grant of an estate in fee as security for the payment of money, and on the condition that if the money shall be paid according to the contract, the grant shall be void, and the mortgagee shall re-convey the estate to the mortgager. Formerly the condition was, that if the mortgager should repay the money at the day specified, he might then re-enter on the estate granted in pledge; but the modern practice is for the mortgagee, on receiving payment, to reconvey the land to the mortgager. Before the TIME specified for payment, that is, between the time of contract and the time limited for payment, the estate is conditional, and the mortgagee is called TENENT in mortgage; but on failure of payment at the TIME LIMITED, the estate becomes absolute in the mortgagee. But in this case, courts of equity interpose, and if the estate is of more value than the debt, they will on application grant a reasonable TIME for the mortgager to redeem the estate. This is called the equity of redemption. 2. The state of being pledged; as lands given in mortgage. 3. A pledge of goods or chattels by a debtor to a creditor, as security for the debt. – verb transitive – mor’gage. To grant an estate in fee as security for money lent or contracted to be paid at a certain TIME, on condition that if the debt shall be discharged according to the contract, the grant shall be void, otherwise to remain in full force. It is customary to give a mortgage for securing the repayment of money lent, or the payment of the purchase money of an estate, or for any other debt… (–Webster’s 1828)

MORTALadjective – [Latin mortalis, from mors, death, or morior, to die, that is, TO FALL.] 1. Subject to death; destined to die. Man is mortal. 2. Deadly; destructive to life; causing death, or that must cause death; as a mortal wound; mortal poison. The fruit, Of that forbidden tree whose mortal taste. Brought death into the world, and all our woe— 3. Bringing death; terminating life. Safe in the hand of one disposing power, Or in the natal or the mortal hour. 4. Deadly in malice or purpose; as a mortal foe. In colloquial language, a mortal foe is an inveterate foe. 5. Exposing to certain death; incurring the penalty of death; condemned to be punished with death; not venial; as a mortal sin. 6. HUMAN; belonging to man who is mortal; as mortal wit or knowledge; mortal power. The voice of God, To mortal ear is dreadful. 7. Extreme; violent. [Not elegant.] The nymph grew pale, and in a mortal fright— – noun – Man; a being subject to death; a human being. Warn poor mortals left behind. It is often used in ludicrous and colloquial language. I can behold no mortal now. (–Webster’s 1828)


In Nature, all things are timeless. Immortal. Eternal.  This merely means that spiritually nothing in Nature has a beginning or an end, for to begin and end requires a recorded timeline of events. In this way, the immortal man of God, immortal and eternal due to the passing of blood and thus Life itself in procreation of posterity, is turned instead into a mortal (time-based) legal entity that begins and ends as the recorded history of the legal realm. We are plucked from God’s Creation and placed into man’s fictional simulation of It. We thus become the victims of the artifice of time.

That which is mort-gaged (a dead pledge) is that which is placed under a contract of debt based on time. What is placed into the register of the time domain is always dead. All persons, places, and things (nouns/names) of the legal system, of Rome, are dead.

History, in other words, is always the story of the dead, even when its characters are still Living in the Real. The fiction of history is never the Reality of Life. And the life of a fictional person (strawman) can only be accounted for by the event and consideration of its birth-day on the Roman calendar, the calendar of the legal system. There is no age in Nature, only True Life.

Under God’s Law of Nature, it is not so much that men own the land, it is that the land owns the man. There are no parts, only the Oneness of all Creation. Man, in other words, is to be wed to the land in respect and in husbandry:


(Links are active in these quotes)


“To husband is to use with care, to keep, to save, to make last, to conserve. Old usage tells us that there is a husbandry also of the land, of the soil, of the domestic plants and animals ― obviously because of the importance of these things to the household. And there have been times, one of which is now, when some people have tried to practice a proper human husbandry of the nondomestic creatures in recognition of the dependence of our households and domestic life upon the wild world. Husbandry is the name of all practices that sustain life by connecting us conservingly to our places and our world; it is the art of keeping tied all the strands in the living network that sustains us.”

“And so it appears that most and perhaps all of industrial agriculture’s manifest failures are the result of an attempt to make the land produce without husbandry.” 

Wendell Berry, Bringing it to the Table: On Farming and Food


“It is possible, I think, to say that… a Christian agriculture [is] formed upon the understanding that it is sinful for people to misuse or destroy what they did not make. The Creation is a unique, irreplaceable gift, therefore to be used with humility, respect, and skill.”

Wendell Berry, The Unsettling of America: Culture and Agriculture


Athey was not exactly, or not only, what is called a “landowner.” He was the farm’s farmer, but also its creature and belonging. He lived its life, and it lived his; he knew that, of the two lives, his was meant to be the smaller and the shorter.” 

Wendell Berry, Jayber Crow


“If the Land can be preserved long enough for its stories to be told, and retold, perhaps we all — as custodians of both place and memory — stand a chance at real preservation.” 

Ari Berk


“Atheism is the philosophical equivalent of a fish denying the existence of land because he lacks the means to experience it.” 

J.Adam Snyder


“The land is always there… it is you who has to return” 

Munia Khan


“Where wilderness can still be found, the ancientness of the land and the nobility of man’s struggle emerge. Wilderness is vastly different from the clutter and clatter of much of our civilized world. In wilderness one experiences exhilaration and joy. In freedom and simplicity, in its vitality and immense variety, happiness may not only be pursued; it is ofttimes found.” 

Harvey Broome, Out Under Sky Of Great Smokies: A Personal Journal


“A true conservationist is a man who knows that the world is not given by his fathers, but borrowed from his children.” 

John James Audubon


“In the loss of skill, we lose stewardship; in losing stewardship we lose fellowship; we become outcasts from the great neighborhood of Creation. It is possible ― as our experience in this good land shows ― to exile ourselves from Creation, and to ally ourselves with the principle of destruction ― which is, ultimately, the principle of nonentity. It is to be willing in general for being to not-be. And once we have allied ourselves with that principle, we are foolish to think that we can control the results.” 

Wendell Berry, The Art of the Commonplace: The Agrarian Essays (pg. 303, The Gift of Good Land)


Like the spiritual union of husband and wife, through good times and bad, rain or shine, man and the land are intrinsically inter-connected. Land represents True, Natural Freedom. And with such Freedom comes a natal responsibility and duty to that wedded land. It’s a mutual dependency, a spiritual partnership.

It is only through technology (art) and the legal systems of law that govern it that man is losing that spiritual connection, delving further and further into an “augmented virtual reality” of a fictional world, a digital hell built by nerds without moral compunctions or limitations. Kids now learn by picture and video evidence that the Reality of God’s Nature and substance of Life Exists.

For the record, you are even now living (artificially) as a figure (form without substance, a strawman) from history. The year of the elite, of what George Carlin stated are “the owners of this country,” is based on the ancient Hebrew calendar. For AM (Anno Mundi – Latin for “in the year of the world”; Hebrew: לבריאת העולם‎, “from the creation of the world”) 5778 began at sunset on 20 September, 2017 of the Roman calendar and will end at sunset on 9 September, 2018.

Notice the difference between years. Another words, notice the fact that 2017 happened over 3700 years ago — yet another alternative timeline created by man. We are history. But also notice that their calendar starts from the Biblical notion of the age of the begining or creation of the world, whereas the Roman calendar starts at zero, only 2,017 years ago, and the so-called “birth of christ.”

The Latin terms anno Domini (AD) and before Christ (BC) are used to label or number years in both the Julian and the Gregorian calendars. The medieval term anno Domini means “in the year of the Lord”, or sometimes “in the year of our Lord.” In this system there is the time before and the time after, whereas in the Hebrew calendar there is only the time from the “Creation of the world.” So what is this alternative timeline that we, the goyim, have been rerouted upon? One might crudely say that one is private and one is public.

It is interesting to note that there would be no history if the Natural Law of God was followed without error. This state of being in Oneness with God’s Nature is described beautifully, and is a lifestyle almost completely foreign to what we have been entrained to do in our spiritually dead, public, civil life:



“In the age when life on earth was full, no one paid any special attention to worthy men, nor did they single out the man of ability. Rulers were simply the highest branches on the tree, and the people were like deer in the woods. They were honest and righteous without realizing that they were “doing their duty.” They loved each other and did not know that this was “love of neighbor.” They deceived no one yet they did not know that they were “men to be trusted.” They were reliable and did not know that this was “good faith.” They lived freely together giving and taking, and did not know that they were generous. For this reason their deeds have not been narrated. They made no history. “

―Thomas Merton, The Way of Chuang Tzu


This is the perfect description of a timeless people, a social stratus not bogged down by the histories and timelines of the dead. They have no status because they have no time, and thus no reason to act any other way than that which is inherently built into the Law of Nature. There were no contracts, no birth certificates, no licenses (as permissions to break the law), and there was no reason to lie. There was no need of money. And no man said what he did not mean. In short, this describes a world without the history of recorded time, a world without use or need for the legal realm and its false, lawless law of commerce and greed.

Comparatively, we find our modern society in complete opposition to this timeless paradise:


People are machines. Machines have to be blind and unconscious, they cannot be otherwise, and all their actions have to correspond to their nature. Everything happens. No one does anything. ‘Progress’ and ‘civilization,’ in the real meaning of these words, can appear only as the result of conscious efforts. They cannot appear as the result of unconscious mechanical actions.”

And what conscious effort can there be in machines? And if one machine is unconscious, then a hundred machines are unconscious, and so are a thousand machines, or a hundred thousand, or a million. And the unconscious activity of a million machines must necessarily result in destruction and extermination. It is precisely in unconscious involuntary manifestations that all evil lies. You do not yet understand and cannot imagine all the results of this evil. But the time will come when you will understand.

    –G. I. Gurdjieff, In Search of The Miraculous


And what is the nature of the common people (goyim) placed into the time domain of the legal, fictional realm and its law of fiction?

Remember the pods in The Matrix?

We sleep while they (persons) live. in a simulated, artificial reality; a simulacrum. The person is required to follow the strict legal law like an automaton without choice or reasoning, like a computer program straight out of Tron, bound by the coded algorithms of the legal system and law. For the legal system can exist in no other way, nor can men have power over others without this strict and sanctionable law based on sanctions (consequential punishments) depending solely on calendric time.

This, again is the legalistic construct of the time domain, the place where only the dead roam. It is the place where men exist without spiritual Lives of their own, stuck in exactly the trap described here:


“After having thus successively taken each member of the community in its powerful grasp and fashioned him at will, the supreme power then extends its arm over the whole community. It covers the surface of society with a network of small, complicated rules, minute and uniform, through which the most original minds and the most energetic characters cannot penetrate, to rise above the crowd. The will of man is not shattered, but softened, bent, and guided; men seldom forced by it to act, but they are constantly restrained from acting. Such a power does not destroy, but it prevents existence; it does not tyrannize, but it compresses, enervates, extinguishes, and stupefies a people, till each nation is reduced to nothing better than a flock of timid and industrious animals, of which the government is the shepherd.

—Alexis de Tocqueville (1805–1859)


The scriptures tell us to remain the sheep of the shepherd that is Jesus Christ, meaning to follow the Law of Nature (Jehovah). Instead, through all these delusions of nationalism and patriotism, we become the he-goats of men, the followers of the unnatural law of legalism, head-strong and confident without knowledge, gullible and yet proudly arrogant about our gullibility. We animate the dead fictions in a lega-land of make-believe and corruption, where no land actually Exists without respect of persons, paces, and things (names/nouns/flattering legal titles), and therefore we are causally molded to stand in disrespect of the scriptural, moral, spiritual Law to keep our Nature Pure (Real, in Nature, without artifice) and deny all the lies and fictions of men — the fruit of the tree of knowledge of empty and meaningless concepts of such things as legalism and finance.

The word mortal has both a Natural (Real) and a fictional (legal) meaning. When used of men as Living Beings and thus “Creations of God,” then the intent is to signify Life Itself, being only temporary Beings in Nature and yet Living eternalyl (immortally) through the passing of the blood (procreation), having no such foolish customs as a birthday or other legally enforced, paganistic holy days (holidays).

However, when the legal term is employed, though it appears and sounds exactly the same, this word mortal carries a different intent. In the legal realm, to be mortal and thus “subject to death” refers to being granted a civil artificial life in the guise of a legal status (persona/mask). It turns man into hu-man, as merely the sellable property or character of man, but no longer a timeless, immortal man. Human being is not the same as Being a man, for what is human is what belongs to man. Thus the anatomy of a man is expressed as the “human anatomy,” signifying that which belongs to man but that is not the full substance of the Living, complete man — the mind, body, and soul as One Being governed under the Law and Laws of Nature (God). The human mind and human nature are other examples of that which belongs to man but is not the full essence of man. Again, this word hu-man carries the notion of what is the property of man in the legal sense. No man should strive to be or be called as human (i.e. “Adam”), nor should he use it as an excuse for his individual actions, as for instance, I’m only human or as human error. Ones error is always ones own, and no man in Nature can ever excuse his actions before Nature’s God as being only human (property of another). It is interesting to note here that the word Adam in the Bible also refers to human beings and not men of God, as men considered after falling away from the Grace of God’s Law. Man is only considered divine when he is subject, obedient to, and totally under the Law of Nature (Jehovah).


“Human things never prosper where divine things are neglected.”



And so above we see that mortal is defined in two ways, where the Natural man is mortal (will die a physical death in Nature), and as the humanity (sophism) that belongs to mortal man in persona. But here we must differentiate between these two concepts.

We must at all times strive to belong only to God. We should never, therefore, seek to be hu-man in our True Being. In other words, all of our thoughts and actions should be in Love and protection of what is the Supreme Being (all things Real and True without fiction), the Supremacy of all Being, which is defined as Jehovah (God). I remind the reader again that the Word Jehovah is a verb, and thus so is the word Being. God (as Jehovah) is not defined in the Bible an external “being” from Nature, but is all of Existence, Truth, Reality, and thus Nature (the Uni-verse) Itself as the Oneness of this continuous and TIMELESS Being (verb) we are a part of. Existence is a state of Being, and man’s Existence (Being) therein should be in harmony with the Nature of Jehovah and so obviously beholden to Its self-evident Law and Laws of Nature.

I urge the reader once again to dispel any notion of this being religion. Religion is what is built up around the Bible and other Holy Books to steer one away from the  knowledge and Law within, to cause this externalization of God from Nature (Creation) as well as our own place within. This is the two realms of Law, one of the Real, of Nature, and one of the artifice, of fiction. One is of God (Jehovah), and one is of that which is adversarial to God. One cannot be known or understood without the other, as the light which illuminates the dark.

JEHOVAHnoun – The Scripture name of the Supreme Being. If, as is supposed, this name is from the Hebrew SUBSTANTIVE VERB, the word denotes the Permanent Being, as the primary sense of the SUBSTANTIVE VERB in all languages, is to be fixed, to stand, to remain or abide. This is a name peculiarly appropriate to the eternal Spirit, THE UNCHANGEABLE GOD, who describes himself thus, I am that I am. Exodus 3:14. (–Webster’s 1828)

God is a verb…

To those with eyes to see and ears to hear, you will find this to be the most spiritually beautiful understanding of your entire Life. And suddenly, without the images and false idols of the works of art and fiction of the church and its anti-Biblelical false-doctrines of religion, you will find that the entirety of the Bible can now be understood in its True intention. Of course, all such words must be deciphered from the evil intentions of that revisionist king of England. For what is a story of Law if the words have been altered into the dog-Latin idiocracy of the common language of English?

It is for this reason that I have compiled my free, downloadable works entitled Strawman: The Real Story Of Your Artificial Person. (




Why is specific, intentional definition of “God” as “Jehovah” by the authors of the ancient Bible (Law) important?

To answer this question, we must always dissect that which is opposed to our subject. If legalism exists only in the domain of man’s artificially kept time, then we must compare it to what Truly Exists in the domain of timelessness, and examine which Law controls each?

If God (as Jehovah) is what Is, what Was, and what shall always and unchangeably Be in the future, and there is nothing new under the sun, then Nature is of course a timeless, unchangeable domain. In other words, its Laws remain unaltered. This is not merely an empty, religious belief system, but rather the necessary basis and foundation of Law.


Maxim’s of Law:

“The foundation being removed, the superstructure falls.”

Sublato fundamento cadit opus.


“When respect for magistrates (legal gods) is taken away, the commonwealth falls.”

Sublata veneratione magistratuum, respublica ruit.


In this way, the Author of the Law of Nature must be considered as foundational, sound, and secure, even unbreakable, so that Its Law as well is to be respected as unbreakable. This is purely reasonable in every way, for without such a foundation all things must reasonably fail. If this be the case, then we must not confuse man’s creation of organized (corporate) religion, which is continuously changing with every papal Bull or other amendment to its corporate charter and articles of incorporation, with the Truth of what we call as the Law of Jehovah (Nature). The Bible is a Book of Law, and is to be followed religiously. Religion and its denominations are not verbs (actions) but a nouns (empty, flattering titles), and requires no law to be followed, only the blind faith and pledge of its members to the corporate structure of that religion and its false doctrines. While the Bible is and promotes only what is self-Evident Truth, religion steals Truth away and replaces it with nonsense and trickery in support of the time-based history and legal system of the law of man that incorporated each religion into its purely legal, fictional existence as a corporation (artificial person in law). Even the Vatican is a legal person (corporation).

ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCHThe juristic personality of the Roman Catholic Church, with the right to sue and to take and hold property, has been recognized by all systems of European law from the fourth century. It was formally recognized between Spain and the Papacy and by Spanish laws from the beginning of the settlements in the Indies, also by our treaty with Spain in 1898, whereby its property rights were solemnly safe-guarded. To the same effect as to the Philippines. (–Black’s Law 4th Edition)

JURISTICPertaining or belonging to, or characteristic of, jurisprudence, or a jurist, or the legal profession. (–Black’s Law 4th Edition)

JURISPRUDENCEThe philosophy of law, or the SCIENCE which treats of the principles of POSITIVE LAW AND LEGAL RELATIONS. “The term is wrongly applied to actual systems of law, or to current views of law, or to suggestions for its amendment, but is the name of a SCIENCE. This science is a formal, or analytical, rather than a material, one. It is the science of actual or positive law. It is wrongly divided into ‘general’ and ‘particular, or into ‘philosophical’ and ‘historical.’ It may therefore be defined as THE FORMAL SCIENCE OF POSITIVE LAW. In the proper sense of the word, “jurisprudence” is the science of law, namely, that science which has for its function to ascertain the principles on which legal rules are based, so as not only to classify those rules in their proper order, and show the relation in which they stand to one another, but also to settle the manner in which new or doubtful cases should be brought under the appropriate rules. Jurisprudence is more a formal than a material science. It has no direct concern with questions of MORAL or political policy, for they fall under the province of ethics and legislation; but, when a new or doubtful case arises to which two different rules seem, when taken literally, to be equally applicable, It may be, and often is, the function of jurisprudence to consider the ultimate effect which would be produced if each rule were applied to an indeflnite number of similar cases, and to choose that rule which, when so applied, will produce the greatest advantage to the community. (–Black’s Law 4th Edition)


Science. The Roman Catholic Church is a positive (manmade) legal entity, a corporate persona that practices legal (anti-God) law. It is not of God’s Nature nor does it practice in any way the Law of God’s Nature. It is the creator of the modernly used, almost universal civil law calendar. It is the instigator of this time-based society and the A. D. timeline we are so accustomed to, though it has nothing to do with Jesus Christ. For the pope is a pretender, a vicar (replacement) Christ on earth, standing legally, vicariously in the stead of (anti-) the Biblical Christ in corporate personhood.

Does the average animal or insect know what time it is according to some records-keeping system? Do they migrate because their digital alarm clock just went off or because instinctually they just know by their own connection to Nature? Do animals have a history channel? Other than what is spiritually written in their RNA and epigenome, of course not.

But, you might suggest, they apparently know what time of the year to migrate and return, to hibernate and to wake, and when to mate, gestate, and even the proper season to bear young. And yet there is no year in Nature, no time. Just because a sun dial tells time does not mean the sun does. Hopefully our dumbed down society knows the difference still between the technology of man and the Creation and Energy of God that breathes animation into otherwise motionless junk. In fact, all technologies are designs merely to harness and control the timelessness of God’s Creation and Being (verb).

The automobile needs a timing belt, among other regulators and sensors that keep the regularly scheduled or requisite operation of timed, moving parts. It takes a timing wrench to make adjustments. What would an engine or generator be without man’s control of timed explosions of fuel or bursts of regulated electricity?

We can also see a cultural difference between tribes and nations:


When people are destroyed and languages are destroyed, you destroy that knowledge along with it. So what do indigenous people have to offer? Indigenous people have the long-term thinking required for proper context.

“What Indians are about, I think, first of all is community. They’re about mutual support. They’re about sharing. They’re about understanding what’s common land, common air, common water, common and for all. They’re about freedom.

We are now. Now is us. We’re the seventh generation. I’m sitting here as the seventh generation because seven generations ago people were looking out for me. Seven generations from now someone will be here, I know. Each generation makes sure that seventh generation is coming, all the time.

—Chief Oren Lyons, from an interview with Bill Moyers on July 3, 1991, as aired on ‘Public Affairs Television’


“Nothing external to you has any power over you.”

—Ralph Waldo Emerson



—Gary R. Kane


“God creates out of nothing, therefore, until a man is nothing, God can make nothing out of him.

—Martin Luther


For if a man think himself to be something, when he is nothing, he deceiveth himself. But let every man prove his own work, and then shall he have rejoicing in himself alone, and NOT IN ANOTHER.

—Galatians 6: 3-4, KJB


Identity requires an epoch. Identity is of the time domain. Legal (registered) identity theft proves that identity is never actually ones own. Identity is legal property. Identity is but a notation in history, in the record books and sealed birth certificates (financial instruments) of the government bureaucracy.

It’s very simple… to be born again is not a religious concept. It is not external from man or from Nature. We must gain our True and spiritual Life back by abandoning the artificial self (legal persona/mask) that causes us such a spiritual death under the law of the dead. Civil life (legal personhood) is spiritual death to a man of God, for the civil law requires abandonment of the Law of Nature.

To come back to Life from the dead pledge of surety to a legal persona (strawman) is the essence of regaining ones spirit Life, of being born again into Nature as we were at the innocence of our inception. It is to abandon time and become Eternal once again.


So also is the resurrection of the dead. It is sown in corruption; it is raised in incorruption: It is sown in dishonour; it is raised in glory: it is sown in weakness; it is raised in power: It is sown a natural body; it is raised a spiritual body. There is a natural body, and there is a spiritual body.

—1 Corinthians 15:42-44, KJB


“Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add “within the limits of the law” because law is often but the tyrant’s will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual.

—Thomas Jefferson


“The very idea of the power and the right of the People to establish Government presupposes the duty of every Individual to obey the established Government.”

—George Washington (Farewell Address, September 19, 1796)


Nothing relieves the soul than to release oneself from history. For history is always the product of tyrants, of the victors of wars both physical and spiritual. Without historical events without the pretended and declared epoch of a new people, and without religiously worshiped records from the time domain of history, there can be no justification for any governmental structure.

HISTORYnounAn account mostly false, of events mostly unimportant, which are brought about by rulers mostly knaves, and soldiers mostly fools. (–The Devil’s Dictionary, by Ambrose Beirce, 1911)


Historians, of course, use WORDS to influence the reader. And it is generally admitted today that 90% of history is written by victors at the expense of the vanquished. And we always make a villain out of the loser, regardless of circumstances. So, we have all kinds of problems in history. We take the words; we believe them. But we don’t know whether they are true or not We decide that the historian is correct if we agree with him. He is incorrect if we disagree with him. When in reality the facts of the matter are seldom actually considered.

—Manly P. Hall, from a recorded lecture on “Language: the Use, Misuse and Abuse of Words”


“Traditional people of Indian nations have interpreted the two roads that face the light-skinned race as the road to technology and the road to spirituality. We feel that the  road to technology has led modern society to a damaged and seared earth. Could it be that the road to technology  represents a rush to destruction, and that the road to spirituality represents the slower path that the traditional native people have traveled and are now seeking again? The earth is not scorched on this trail. The grass is still growing there.”

—William Commanda, Mamiwinini, Canada, 1991


What is technology but art; that which is artificial. Art is representation, simulation, but never sameness. Art is anti-Nature, anti-Reality. Art replaces the spirit and substance of the Real with the cold, dead, falsified existence. It is not art that is the problem, but the respect of it over the Reality it represents. Technology thus severs man from his own place in Nature, even taking away the dignity of laboring for his sustenance therein. Men have lost their calluses and their will to commune with their very own place in Nature. We must make calendric appointments at certain times and dates to visit some primped and pruned campground, and get license to hunt or fish within certain times of dated seasons. We have actually lost our ability to Live in our Source of Existence. Jehovah is lost to our senses, externalized by church and state into some silly, artful representation, personified and anthropomorphized into oblivion.

And in God’s stead are seated kings, popes, and other magistrates (false gods).

But for these kings, these sovereign heads of tyrannical and lawless corporations, time simply has no power. For if you didn’t know, you should, that there are no statutes of limitations upon the gods of legal fiction. They wear the crowns of immortal offices, of legally created and ordained gods passed down from the epochal bloodline of those corrupted generations before them.


Maxims of law:

Time does not run against the king. 

“The rule refers to the king in his official capacity as REPRESENTING the sovereignty of the nation and not to the king as an individual.”

—NULLUM TEMPUS OCCURRIT REGI. City of Bisbee b. Cochise County, 52 Ariz. 1, 78 P.2d 982, 984.


NO TIME OR PLACE affects the king.” 

—NULLUM TEMPUS AUT LOCUS OCCURRIT REGI. 2 Inst. 273; Jenk. Cent. 83; Broom, Max. 65.


No time runs [time does not run] AGAINST THE COMMON WEALTH OR STATE.” 

—NULLUM TEMPUS OCCURRIT REIPUBLICAE. Covington County v. O’Neal, 239 Ala. 322,195 So. 234,238.


Sovereignty, in whatever corporate form it manifests, be it vested in a king or in the president or the governor of some State, is immune from the timeline of fictional, legal persons, places (jurisdictions), and things (properties). For sovereignty only exists in the fiction of men. To the man of God, ones only sovereign is Jehovah, for man is to have no other gods (sovereigns) before Jehovah. To be under the Law of Nature, the Creator of Nature must be man’s only admitted sovereign. All other forms of so-called sovereignty are a lie, for sovereignty only exists in the legal realm, a legal status attached to legal persons (corporate entities).


Maxim of law:

There is no fiction without law.



“A Spirit that loves wisdom and contemplates the Truth close at hand, is forced to disguise it, to induce the multitude to accept itFictions are necessary to the people, and the Truth becomes deadly to those who are not strong enough to contemplate it in all its brilliance In fact, what can there be in common between the vile multitude and sublime wisdom? THE TRUTH MUST BE KEPT SECRET, and the masses need a teaching proportioned to their imperfect reason.

—“Synesius, Bishop of Ptolemais, a great Kabalist, but of doubtful orthodoxy,” excerpted from Albert Pike’s, ‘Morals and Dogma’


“But he (Jesus christ) answered and said unto them, Why do ye also transgress the commandment of God BY YOUR TRADITION? Thus have ye made the commandment of God of none effect BY YOUR TRADITION. Ye hypocrites, well did Esaias prophesy of you, saying, This people draweth nigh unto me with their mouth, and honoureth me with their lips; but their heart is far from me. But in vain they do worship me, TEACHING FOR DOCTRINES THE COMMANDMENTS OF MEN.

—Matthew 15: 3 and 6-9, KJB


But what exactly does this alternative timeline mean? What does it represent? And just who caused its epoch?

Fortunately, a quite well-sourced Wikipedia entry clues us in to exactly what this alternative “Anno Domini” Christ timeline really represents in the fictional, legal realm. Remember, do not take offense at what is being revealed here, for it is the perspective of the adversary that we seek to understand here — that incestuous, minority group of “rulers.” This is a research article not of opinion but of the cold, hard Truth, which is most often not what we wish it to be.

(Note: links are active and clickable and will bring you to another website than this blog.)

Remember that the words common an vulgar are used both of the common (vulgar) national citizenship (goyim) and of the common (vulgar) English language, which “they” call dog-Latin, as opposed to the king’s higher or legal language they have created as their own terms of art.

Pay special notice below that the “Beginning of the vulgar era” began at the death of Christ, in other words, starting with the Reign of the Pope, which claims to be the vicar and “Sweet Christ on Earth,” as in the replacement or “anti” Christ. The term “anti” simply means in place of or in the stead (standing) of, and basically it fictionally recreates a mortal man into the immortal (inheritable) Ecclesiastical office and so-called “spiritual jurisdiction” of God. Needless to say, we are stuck in this vulgar era of the death-cult of Christ or “A.D.” as a timeline spent under a false god, the sovereign rule of the Vatican corporation. For indeed, the Catholic religion celebrates the death of Jesus the Christos (Anointed) above all else. Its favorite symbol, after all, is the very torture device the pretend literally killed the “Son of God.”

Whether you believe this either literally or figuratively or not is not a matter for this research. What matters in only that this is what “they” believe, or at least pretend to believe, to justify their rulership. If in doubt, one may simply read the Papal Bull Unum Sanctum, which commands that:


“Furthermore, we declare, we proclaim, we define that it is absolutely necessary for salvation that every HUMAN CREATURE BE SUBJECT to the Roman Pontiff.

—UNAM SANCTAM, Bull of Pope Boniface VIII, promulgated November 18, 1302


So just what do our self-proclaimed rulers call the Anno Domini (After Christ’s “death”) timeline they created, and why do we all seem to be stuck in it, like avatars going round and round on the legal monopoly board?

Common Era:

Common Era or Current Era (CE)[1] is a year-numbering system (calendar era) for the Julian and Gregorian calendars that refers to the years since the start of the present era, that is, the years beginning with AD 1. The preceding era is referred to as before the Common or Current Era (BCE). The Current Era notation system can be used as an alternative to the Dionysian era system, which distinguishes eras as AD (anno Domini, “[the] year of [the] Lord“)[2] and BC (“before Christ“). The two notation systems are numerically equivalent; thus “2017 CE” corresponds to “AD 2017” and “400 BCE” corresponds to “400 BC”.[2][3][4][a] The year-numbering system as used for the Gregorian calendar is the most widespread civil calendar system used in the world today. For decades, it has been the global standard, recognized by international institutions such as the United Nations and the Universal Postal Union.

The expression has been traced back to 1615, when it first appeared in a book by Johannes Kepler as the Latin usage vulgaris aerae,[5][6] and to 1635 in English as “Vulgar Era.[b] The term “Common Era” can be found in English as early as 1708,[7] and became more widely used in the mid-19th century by Jewish academics. In the later 20th century, the use of CE and BCE was popularized in academic and scientific publications, and more generally by authors and publishers wishing to emphasize secularism or sensitivity to non-Christians, by not explicitly referencing Jesus as “Christ” and Dominus (“Lord”) through use of the abbreviation[c] “AD”.[9][10]

Origins: See also: Anno Domini

The year numbering system used with Common Era notation was devised by the Christian monk Dionysius Exiguus in the year 525 to replace the Era of Martyrs system, because he did not wish to continue the memory of a tyrant who persecuted Christians.[11] He attempted to number years from an initial reference date (“epoch“), an event he referred to as the Incarnation of Jesus.[11][12][13] Dionysius labeled the column of the table in which HE INTRODUCED THE NEW ERA AS “Anni Domini Nostri Jesu Christi“.[14]

Numbering years in this manner became more widespread in Europe with its usage by Bede in England in 731. Bede also introduced the practice of dating years before what he supposed was the year of birth of Jesus[15] and the practice of not using a year zero.[d] In 1422, Portugal became the last Western European country to switch to the system begun by Dionysius.[16]

Vulgar Era: 

Caption: “Johannes Kepler first used “Vulgar Era” to
distinguish dates on the Christian calendar from
the regnal years typically used in national law.”

The term “Common Era” is traced back in English to its appearance as “Vulgar Era[e] to distinguish dates on the Ecclesiastic calendar from those of the regnal year, THE YEAR OF REIGN OF A SOVEREIGN, typically used in NATIONAL LAW.

The first use of the Latin term vulgaris aerae[f] discovered so far was in a 1615 book by Johannes Kepler.[6] Kepler uses it again in a 1616 table of ephemerides,[17] and again in 1617.[18] A 1635 English edition of that book has the title page in English – so far, the earliest-found usage of Vulgar Era in English.[19] A 1701 book edited by John LeClerc includes “Before Christ according to the Vulgar Æra, 6“.[20] A 1716 book in English by Dean Humphrey Prideaux says, “BEFORE THE BEGINNING OF THE VULGAR ÆRA (ERA), by which we now compute the years from his incarnation.[21][22] A 1796 book uses the term “vulgar era of the nativity“.[23]

The first so-far-discovered usage of “Christian Era” is as the Latin phrase aerae christianae on the title page of a 1584 theology book.[24] In 1649, the Latin phrase æræ Christianæ appeared in the title of an English almanac.[25] A 1652 ephemeris is the first instance so-far-found for English usage of “Christian Era”.[26]

The English phrase “common Era” appears at least as early as 1708,[7] and in a 1715 book on astronomy is used interchangeably withChristian Era andVulgar Era“.[27] A 1759 history book uses common æra in a generic sense, to refer to the common era of the Jews.[28] The first-so-far found usage of the phrase “before the common era” is in a 1770 work that also uses common era and vulgar era as synonyms, in a translation of a book originally written in German.[29] The 1797 edition of the Encyclopædia Britannica uses the terms vulgar era and common era synonymously.[30] In 1835, in his book Living OraclesAlexander Campbell, wrote: “The vulgar Era, or Anno Domini; the fourth year of Jesus Christ, the first of which was but eight days,[31] and also refers to the common era as a synonym for vulgar era withthe fact that our Lord was born on the 4th year before the vulgar era, called Anno Domini, thus making (for example) the 42d year from his birth to correspond with the 38th of the common era…”[32] The Catholic Encyclopedia (1909) in at least one article reports all three terms (Christian, Vulgar, Common Era) being commonly understood by the early 20th century.[33]

The phrase “common era”, in lower case, also appeared in the 19th century in a generic sense, not necessarily to refer to the Christian Era, but to any system of dates in common use throughout a civilization. Thus, “the common era of the Jews,[34][35] “the common era of the Mahometans,”[36] “common era of the world,[37] “the common era of the foundation of Rome.[38] When it did refer to the Christian Era, it was sometimes qualified, e.g., common era of the Incarnation“,[39] common era of the Nativity“,[40] orcommon era of the birth of Christ“.[41]

An adapted translation of Common Era into pseudo-Latin as Era Vulgaris (in Latin this means Common Mistress)[42] was adopted in the 20th century by some followers of Aleister Crowley, and thus the abbreviation “e.v.” or “EV” may sometimes be seen as a replacement for AD.[43]

History of the use of the CE/BCE abbreviation

Although Jews have their own Hebrew calendar, they often use the Gregorian calendar.[44]

As early as 1825, the abbreviation VE (for Vulgar Era) was in use among Jews to denote years in the Western calendar.[45]

Common Era notation has also been in use for Hebrew lessons for “more than a century”.[46] Some Jewish academics were already using the CE and BCE abbreviations by the mid-19th century, such as in 1856, when Rabbi and historian Morris Jacob Raphall used the abbreviation in his book Post-Biblical History of The Jews.[47][g]

In the 200 years between 1808 and 2008 the ratio of usage of BCE to BC has increased by about 20% and CE to AD by about 50%, primarily since 1980.[49] […]

–Wikipedia entry for “Common Era”


How can the Jews possibly have a common era? Because Jews are supposed to be without a nation, without a state. Ironically, once they become citizens of a sovereign corporation like Israel or United States, the become that which they despise, the sons of a nation. Goyim. They become commoners, as legal (spiritually dead) civil persons not under the Law of their Torah-based God. Neither is the True follower of christ to respect any persons, and thus cannot be a citizen of a nation (sovereign, corporate government) and the legal (anti-God) positive law of its legal gods (magistrates).

When we seek the time and date according to the Hebrew calendar in the modern day, de facto (illegitimate) corporation of “Israel,” we find the following notation in reference to the standard world clock system based on Greenwich Mean Time (GMT):

  • Note: The date listed is based on the Gregorian calendar. Most Jewish holidays begin at sunset the day before the date listed, as according to the HEBREW CALENDAR the Jewish day starts at sunset rather than midnight.
  • The year 2017 is a common year, with 365 days in total.
  • Calendar type: Gregorian calendar
  • It is not yet possible to show the calendar using a Hebrew/Jewish year.
  • The calendar shows the Hebrew/Jewish dates between Tevet 3, AM 5777 and Tevet 13, AM 5778
  • The Hebrew/Jewish year AM 5777 is a deficient year (12 months with a total of 353 days)
  • The Hebrew/Jewish year AM 5778 is a regular year (12 months with a total of 354 days)
  • The Hebrew/Jewish year numbering uses AMANNO MUNDI – YEAR OF THE WORLD.


At this point, we can certainly conclude that time is an integral pillar in the causality of legal fiction. Without time, history would have no spacial orientation, no reference to signify it is a thing of the past. The recording of time is integral to the modern keeping of any foundation built upon the supposed legitimacy of the events of the past. As Orwell stated in Nineteen Eighty-Four, “Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.” What is the past but recorded events, and what is the future but the continuation of the past? Without time, there is neither, and so neither can exist without respect of recorded calendric time. 

In the next deconstruction of the four pillars of fiction, the subject of valuation will be directed, another word for the god of mammon. Not money, but the empty value of money shall be uncovered. For in the end, we find that money is only a representation of time, causing both future and past time (labor hours) to be a sellable commodity. Without value, as without time, the fiction would be worthless. There would be no point to it, and no reason for growth. And only through the artificial valuation of everything in Existence can the legal name of everything be made into a sellable property. Through valuation (mammon), the pricelessness of Jehovah is replaced by the currency of monetary worth. The substance is no longer considered, only the valuation in money. This, again, is a spiritual death.

And so in my next essay post on the pillars of fiction I will show that the pricelessness of Jehovah, of Nature, of self-Evident, self-Existent Truth is further proof of Its timelessness. The pillars support each other, and if respect for any one of them fails, the super-structure of this legal matrix is fatally compromised. The system will inevitably crash as the delusion is lifted, the curtain of the grand wizard torn asunder.

Until then, may your days be spent without the hindrance and disability of time, and may the timelessness of God cause you all the happiness you may work to achieve. But rest uneasy, for the church can only offer empty promises of legal things. Trust not in the law of men, but in God alone. And happy new year of the lord or of the Creation or of whatever epoch you may have been tricked into falsely worshiping.


–Clint>Richardson (
–Thursday, December 14th, 2017



A World Without Gray – Episode 3 – For Land And Country

Episode 3, for your listening enjoyment. This is my interview with Vicky Davis, writer and researcher of

I highly recommend that you read the following information (below) before or after listening to this interview, for I believe it is one of my most important research projects yet in uncovering the true nature of the United States. Also, please watch the two videos at the end, for a glimpse of the future of mankind and America…

Download here:


For Land And Country


What does it mean to you when someone says “fight for your country”?

For some, the concept of just what a “country” is becomes blurred between two completely different things. While the conversational term for country usually defines the living people, the physical land, and the fictional government together in one neat package, the fact is that these things are quite different from one another, and are only connected through ink and consent of those living people as a “body politic”.

The “land” – the real and tangible thing we call home – is indeed not legally the “country”. Living men are also not legally the country.

The country is in fact a reamed folder of legal papers, notarized and signed by the appropriate members of a corporate “federation” called the United States. It’s borders are demarcated within this paperwork, but these too are not part of the actual physical land. It sets its own rules, changes those rules with the signing of a pen, and does so without the will of the people.

The land and the living people who inhabit it are called a country – a body politic – but only in a legal sense. The people, in order to inhabit this artificial country legally as “residents”, must also become artificial. They must become persons through contract so as to be part of (citizens) of this legal “country”.

“A “federation” is by definition an unincorporated entity, but a “federated” entity is corporated. A “union” of states is not a corporate entity, but that the “United” States is a corporation.”

Confused? You are supposed to be.

Instead of taking my word for it, I wonder what the government, the courts, and the Supreme Court thinks?

“Persons dealing with the government are charged with knowing government statutes and regulations, and they assume the risk that government agents may exceed their authority and provide misinformation,” –Lavin v. Marsh, 644 F.2d 1378 (9th Cir. 1981), 644 F.2d, at 1383.

“Whatever the form in which the government functions, anyone entering into an arrangement with the government takes a risk of having accurately ascertained that he who purports to act for the government stays within the bounds of his authority, even though the agent himself may be unaware of the limitations upon his authority.” –Federal Crop Insurance v. Merrill, Supreme Court, 332 U.S. 380

From the West LegalEdcenter’s Securities Litigation Report:


“International Coordination”

Twenty-first century finance knows no true geographic borders. Money and risk can move around the globe with a touch of a button. Sober evidence of this was AIG’s swaps affiliate, AIG Financial Products, which had its major operations in London. When it failed, the U.S. economy and taxpayers shouldered a tremendous burden.

The current debt crisis in Europe is but a stark reminder of our interconnectedness. Moreover, it is precisely during times of heightened market uncertainty that transparent pricing of risk is essential. While European leaders are working to avert a deepening crisis, it is critical that we implement the Dodd-Frank Act to protect the American public.

We are actively consulting and coordinating with international regulators to promote robust and consistent standards in swaps oversight. We are sharing many of our memos, term sheets and draft work product with international regulators. Building on these efforts, I will be traveling to London to discuss derivatives reform as well as issues relating to high-frequency trading.

We also will work with international colleagues on memoranda of understanding for access to information and cooperative oversight. We also have a long history of recognizing foreign regulatory regimes. The Dodd-Frank Act authorizes the CFTC to recognize foreign regulatory frameworks that are comprehensive and comparable to U.S. oversight of the swaps markets in certain areas. We also anticipate seeking public input on the application of Section 722(d) of the Dodd-Frank Act, which says that the law doesn’t apply to activities outside the United States unless those activities have a direct and significant connection with activities in, or effect on, U.S. commerce.

So, let’s get this straight… The Dodd-Frank Act was a tool by Congress to prohibit one of government’s regulatory corporations (the Commodities Futures Trading Commission – CFTC) to act outside of United States jurisdiction as long as the activities to be regulated are outside of the United States? Yes sir. But the reality of what this means is even more shocking. For when the term “outside of the United States” is utilized here, it is referring to United States borders (remember, they are paper borders created by treaty and international agreements). This is where “Inland Ports” and “Foreign Trade Zones” come into play. This is how your “country” (both the land and the government) is incrementally being pulled out from under your feet – while American Idol agonizingly plays in the other room – through contracts, treaties, and international agreements.

If we were to look at a true representative interactive map of the borders of the United States, it would actually look like a U.S. shaped slice of Swiss cheese. Incrementally, as each Inland Port and Foreign Trade Zone is implemented, a new hole in the middle of the United States appears, where U.S. laws are non-existent.

Let’s take a land-locked state like Colorado for example. As there are no oceans (international waters) touching any of Colorado’s borders (the land), there is only one way to create an Inland Port in this state. The state must become a virtual body of water.

When an Inland Port is created, it becomes an international jurisdiction under international Maritime Law. And since Maritime/Admiralty law is the “law of the sea”, the land must become a port among a body of water in legal terms. Thus, as a port receiving trade through trade-routes, the land now becomes international jurisdiction. it’s brilliant really, when you stop and think about it. Suddenly a port pops up in the middle of of the land, with no water around it whatsoever. And yet it falls under the law of the sea!

So how is this accomplished?

Perhaps you’ve heard of the controversial NAFTA Super Highways…

You see, the rest of the United States (the land) becomes a “land-bridge” over virtual (paper) water between these ports and zones, and the roads and highways now outside of the United States called NAFTA represent international virtual waterways under international Admiralty Law going from Inland Port to Inland Port. Thus, the whole structure of ports and highways are under the law of the sea – outside of the United States. Why start a limited corporation in the great state of Colorado when you can move 10 miles away into an unlimited Foreign Trade Zone? Why hire American workers with all of their demands and minimum wages laws when you can hire foreigners living in these Foreign Zones? After all, anyone can live and work in the Zones without being a United States citizen. And with no U.S. labor laws, health insurance, or pension funding requirements for retirement, why hire American when you can hire Chinese, Indonesian, or Indian at a fraction of the cost? It’s just on the other side of the Highway you know…

In the middle of America…

So now let’s get back to government’s opinion:

“The House and Senate Reports accompanying the legislation virtually compel this conclusion, explaining as they do that “a foreign government’s . . . employment or engagement of laborers, clerical staff or marketing agents . . . would be among those included within” the definition of commercial activity. H.R.Rep. No. 94-1487, p. 16 (1976) (House Report); S. Rep. No. 94-1310, p. 16 (1976) (Senate Report)…”

“I had thought the [507 U.S. 349, 369] issue put to rest some time ago when, in a slightly different context, CHIEF JUSTICE Marshall observed:

“It is, we think, a sound principle, that when a government becomes a partner in any trading company, it divests itself, so far as concerns the transactions of that company, of its sovereign character, and takes that of a private citizen. Instead of communicating to the company its privileges and its prerogatives, it descends to a level with those with whom it associates itself, and takes the character which belongs to its associates, and to the business which is to be transacted. Thus, many States of this Union who have an interest in Banks, are not suable even in their own Courts; yet they never exempt the corporation from being sued. The State of Georgia, by giving to the Bank the capacity to sue and be sued, voluntarily strips itself of its sovereign character, so far as respects the transactions of the Bank, and waives all the privileges of that character. As a member of a corporation, a government never exercises its sovereignty. It acts merely as a corporator, and exercises no other power in the management of the affairs of the corporation, than are expressly given by the incorporating act.” –U.S. Supreme Court, Bank of the United States v. Planters’ Bank of Georgia (1824) 22 US (9 Wheat) 904, 6 L.Ed 244

See also Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. Republic of Cuba, 425 U.S. 682, 695 -696 (1976) (plurality opinion).”


According to Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, under the definition for the word “corporation”, it states:

“Chief Justice Marshall describes a corporation to be “an artificial being, invisible, intangible, and existing only in contemplation of law. Being the mere creature of law,” continues the judge, “it possesses only those properties which the charter of its creation confers upon it, either expressly or as incidental to its very existence. These are such as are supposed best calculated to effect the object for which it was created. Among the most important are immortality, and if the expression may be allowed, individuality properties by which a perpetual succession of many persons are considered, as the same, and may act as the single individual, They enable a corporation to manage its own affairs, and to hold property without the perplexing intricacies, the hazardous and endless necessity of perpetual conveyance for the purpose of transmitting it from hand to hand. It is chiefly for the purpose of clothing bodies of men, in succession, with these qualities and capacities, that corporations were invented, and are in use.”

(Author’s Note: It is important to note here that technically the corporation of the United States or portions thereof can be “conveyed” to foreign hands, including the United Nations. Remember, this is all on paper, through treaties and agreements. And it wont likely make the nightly news as it happens piece by piece, port by port, zone by zone… This can all be done while never changing the corporate charter name of “United States” or of states, counties, cities (municipal corporations), and districts.)

And this legal definition goes on to state:

Corporation: “Nations or states, are denominated by publicists, bodies politic, and are said to have their affairs and interests, and to deliberate and resolve, in common. They thus become as moral persons, having an understanding and will peculiar to themselves, and are susceptible of obligations and laws. Vattel, 49. In this extensive sense the United States may be termed a corporation; and so may each state singly.”

And Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856, defines the word corporator as:

CORPORATOR. One who is a member of a corporation. 2. In general, a corporator is entitled to enjoy all the benefits and rights which belong to any other member of the corporation as such. But in some corporations, where the rights are of a pecuniary nature, each corporator is entitles to those rights in proportion to his interest; he will therefore be entitled to vote only in proportion to the amount of his stock, and be entitled to dividends in the same proportion. 3. A corporator is not in general liable personally for any act of the corporation, unless he has been made so by the charter creating the corporation.

(Author’s Note: This means the American people can be made liable for United Nations debt or funding, and that the United States is a member- i. e. not a “sovereign” entity – with only a “vote” in world affairs, including its own.)

Note here that the United States is a “member” of the United Nations, and of the International Monetary Fund (World Bank).

Can you put the pieces together?

And of course when Bouvier’s defines the United States, it says:

UNION. By this word is understood the United States of America; as, all good citizens will support the Union.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. The name of this country. The United States… 5. The United States of America are a corporation endowed with the capacity to sue and be sued, to convey and receive property.

Again from the Supreme Court – near the year of the founding of this “country”…

“If Congress, previous to the Articles of Confederation, possessed any authority, it was an authority, as I have shown, derived from the people of each province in the first instance. When the obnoxious acts of Parliament passed, if the people in each province had chosen to resist separately, they undoubtedly had equal right to do so as to join in general measures of resistance with the people of the other provinces, however unwise and destructive such a policy might and undoubtedly would have been. If they had pursued this separate system, and afterwards the people of each province had resolved that such province should be a free and independent state, the state from that moment would have become possessed of all the powers of sovereignty internal and external — viz., the exclusive right of providing for their own government, and regulating their intercourse with foreign nations — as completely as any one of the ancient kingdoms or republics of the world, which never yet had formed or thought of forming any sort of federal union whatever. A distinction was taken at the bar between a state and the people of the state. It is a distinction I am not capable of comprehending. By a state forming a republic (speaking of it as a moral person) I do not mean the legislature of the state, the executive of the state, or the judiciary, but all the citizens which compose that state and are, if I may so express myself, integral parts of it, all together forming a body politic. The great distinction between monarchies and republics (at least our republics) in general is that in the former, the monarch is considered as the sovereign, and each individual of his nation as subject to him, though in some countries with many important special limitations. This, I say, is generally the case, for it has not been so universally.

But in a republic, all the citizens, as such, are equal, and no citizen can rightfully exercise any authority over another but in virtue of a power constitutionally given by the whole community, and such authority, when exercised, is in effect an act of the whole community which forms such body politic. In such governments, therefore, the sovereignty resides in the great body of the people, but it resides in them not as so many distinct individuals, but in their politic capacity only. Thus A. B. C. and D., citizens of Pennsylvania and as such together with all the citizens of Pennsylvania, share in the sovereignty of the state. Suppose a state to consist exactly of the number of 100,000 citizens, and it were practicable for all of them to assemble at one time and in one place, and that 99,999 did actually assemble. The state would not be in fact assembled. Why? Because the state in fact is composed of all the citizens, not of a part only, however large that part may be, and one is wanting, in the same manner as 99 is not a hundred, because one pound is wanting to complete the full sum.

But as such exactness in human affairs cannot take place, as the world would be at an end or involved in universal massacre and confusion if entire unanimity from every society was required; as the assembling in large numbers, if practicable as to the actual meeting of all the citizens, or even a considerable part of them, could be productive of no rational result because there could be no general debate, no consultation of the whole, nor of consequence a determination grounded on reason and reflection, and a deliberate view of all the circumstances necessary to be taken into consideration, mankind has long practiced (except where special exceptions have been solemnly adopted) upon the principle that the majority shall bind the whole, and in large countries, at least, that representatives shall be chosen to act on the part of the whole. But when they do so, they decide for the whole, and not for themselves only.

Thus when the legislature of any state passes a bill by a majority, competent to bind the whole, it is an act of the whole assembly, not of the majority merely. So when this Court gives a judgment by the opinion of a majority, it is the judgment, in a legal sense, of the whole Court. So I conceive when any law is passed in any state in pursuance of constitutional authority, it is a law of the whole state acting in its legislative capacity, as are also executive and judiciary acts constitutionally authorized, acts of the whole state in its executive or judiciary capacity, and not the personal acts alone of the individuals, composing those branches of government. The same principles apply as to legislative, executive, or judicial acts of the United States, which are acts of the people of the United States in those respective capacities, as the former are of the people of a single state. These principles have long been familiar in regard to the exercise of a constitutional power as to treaties. These are deemed the treaties of the two nations, not of the persons only whose authority was actually employed in their formation. There is not one principle that I can imagine which gives such an effect as to treaties that has not such an operation on any other legitimate act of government, all powers being equally derived from the same fountain, all held equally in trust, and all, when rightfully exercised, equally binding upon those from whom the authority was derived.

I conclude, therefore, that every particle of authority which originally resided either in Congress or in any branch of the state governments was derived from the people who were permanent inhabitants of each province in the first instance and afterwards became citizens of each state; that this authority was conveyed by each body politic separately, and not by all the people in the several provinces or states jointly, and of course that no authority could be conveyed to the whole but that which previously was possessed by the several parts; that the distinction between a state and the people of a state has in this respect no foundation, each expression in substance meaning the same thing; consequently, that one ground of argument at the bar, tending to show the superior sovereignty of Congress in the instance in question, was not tenable, and therefore that upon that ground the exercise of the authority in question can not be supported.”


This important opinion tells you one very important thing… You do not now or did they then live in a true idealistic republic! If you are a citizen, you are nothing more than a part of the whole citizenry (in this case equality is a bad thing, for it takes away your rights). You are the State – a tiny piece of the jigsaw puzzle made up of equal size citizens. The people and the State are the same thing. “Distinct individuals have no power or sovereignty – only the state does as a body politic of all the people combined. This literally squashes the theory that in the United States all men are kings of themselves. This is just a falacy to be shelved with all the other “free country” myths out there. And the State creates these treaties and agreements with Foreign entities with the legal presumption that you don’t give a damn!

You aren’t fighting it, if you even know about it, and so the plans for world governance and the conveyance of the United States lands into United Nations (NWO) hands goes on unhindered.

For some clarification, here are the Bovier’s Law Dictionary definitions of a “Republic”:

REPUBLIC. A commonwealth; that form of government in which the administration of affairs is open to all the citizens. In another sense, it signifies the state, independently of its form of government. 1 Toull. n. 28, and n. 202, note. In this sense, it is used by Ben Johnson. Those that, by their deeds make it known, whose dignity they do sustain; And life, state, glory, all they gain, Count the Republic’s, not their own, Vide Body Politic; Nation; State.

REPUBLICAN GOVERNMENT. A government in the republican form; a government of the people; it is usually put in opposition to a monarchical or aristocratic government. 2. The fourth section of the fourth article of the constitution, directs that “the United States shall guaranty to every state in the Union a republican form of government.” The form of government is to be guarantied, which supposes a form already established, and this is the republican form of government the United States have undertaken to protect. See Story, Const. §1807.

Yet another common fallacy squashed by the constitution itself!

Some how the people of the United States have mixed up the notion that the “United States” government – the central government of Washington D.C. as a federation – is supposed to be a republic. But this is not what the constitution states at all. The only requirement of the United States Federal Government laid out in its constitution is that the United States corporation in Washington D.C. must protect the already establish form of government of each individual state. Remember, the citizen is subject to two forms of government, one the state and one Federal.

On this, the Supreme Court state its opinion:

“The people of the United States resident within any State are subject to two Governments: one State, and the other National; but there need be no conflict between the two. The powers which one possesses, the other does not. They are established for different purposes, and have separate jurisdictions. Together they make one whole, and furnish the people of the United States with a complete government, ample for the protection of all their rights at home and abroad. True, it may sometimes happen that a person is amenable to both jurisdictions for one and the same act… It is the natural consequence of a citizenship which owes allegiance to two sovereignties, and claims protection from both. The citizen cannot complain, because he has voluntarily submitted himself to such a form of government.–The Supreme Court, 92 US 551: “U.S. v Cruikshank”

While you may live in a republic within your individual state, you do not live in a republic called the United States. The distinction here is absolutely key, and the tempering of fallacious considerations of the intent of the national government

And if “Common Law” is your bag, you should know that in the same case the Supreme Court stated its opinion about the Common Law:

“It is a rule at common law (the reason applies in equity and other civil law cases) that if a party can plead a fact material to his defense, and omits to do it at the proper time, he can never avail himself of it afterwards.”

Now why would anyone in their right mind agree to such a sinister and offending rule as this? And why would anyone submit to this?

Can you imagine…

You: Oh yeah judge, I forgot to mention that I have a video tape and 20 witnesses that saw me 1,000 miles away from the scene of the crime at the exact time of the crime.

Judge (as his gavel smashes down): Inadmissible! Guilty as charged!!!

It goes on to say:

“The law rather chooses that a party should incur a risk of this nature than leave a door open to endless litigation upon pretenses the truth of which it is very difficult to discover.”

God forbid we should have long litigation in order to discover the truth!

This is called the “justice system”, by the way. And the only thing common about common law is that it is commonly tyrannical just like any other legal system. Even if you had a good experience in court by a judge who seemed lawful or constitutional, this does not dismiss the fact that at any time this type of “opinion” can arise. It’s a rule that a judge may choose to follow at his whim. And while a man acting as judge may certainly consider late evidence, he certainly is not required to. Law means nothing to a corrupt politician or judge. And it is certainly a fallacy to overlook the rules just because once you had a good experience. The fallacy: This judge acted fairly and constitutionally, therefore all judges act fairly and constitutionally.

In this particular case, believe it or not, the “person” harmed was actually physically dead, but since the defendants did not claim this fact within the discovery process, this fact actually had no bearing on the case. The fact that the person was dead was not considered when doing wrong to that person. Image how that felt to the defendants when those words were uttered by the judge, who were no doubt thinking… Why in the hell would this fact even need to be mentioned???

It states:

“II. The death of Doane has been alleged for another purpose.

It is said that the decree is to restore to Elisha Doane, which was impossible because Elisha Doane was not then in being. Admitting that upon this record we are to take judicial notice that Doane was dead at the time of pronouncing the decree (in which I am by no means clear), yet if this was the real reason why the plaintiffs in error had withheld the property or its proceeds, they might themselves have said so. They have not, and as each party generally makes the best of his own case, we are to presume that did not in fact constitute their reason. In this case it could be of no avail but at the utmost to prevent the allowance of interest until a demand actually made. It never could destroy the whole beneficial effect of a decree given in rem, and when the parties who make the objection were in court and parties to the very decree complained of. I think nothing can be more evident than that if the decree be not totally void, the administrators are entitled to the benefit of it, at least until it is set aside for error, if there be any error in it, and such a remedy is now practicable. If a scire facias was necessary before execution could have been obtained out of the court which passed the decree, it could be for no other reason than that the other party might have an opportunity to contest the validity of the letters and the existence of the administration, if any such objection could be supported. Such an objection might have been made here. It has not been made. There is therefore, I conceive, no principle of law or justice which forbids giving effect to the decree upon this ground.”

You: But judge, the victim was already dead before I had anything to do with her!

Judge: Inadmissible! Guilty as charged!!!

Ok, extreme I admit. The point is that the possibility – as a rule – is that at any time a judge can dismiss crucial evidence that would prove your innocence without considering it.

But listen to what was stated even later in this case:

“A court of justice, indeed, ought at its peril to take notice of its own jurisdiction, and it is not often that cases of such doubt arise that a judge can be at a loss on the subject. But it may happen and does sometimes happen that innocent and serious doubts are really entertained. Is a court therefore, because its judgments may be finally dissented from by a superior tribunal, to be considered as flying in the face of the law, so that parties before it shall not only be protected in disobeying it but punished for their obedience? If this be the case, the old maxim cedunt arma togae (let arms yield to the toga – modern: let military power give way to civil power) will very ill apply to courts of justice. Instead of being the peaceful arbiters of right and the sacred asylum of unprotected innocence, their very forums will be the seat of war and confusion.”

Why is this all so important to the establishment of a New World Order Government?

Well let’s see… so far the Supreme court has allowed corporations to be people with rights, allowed these corporations to merge and acquire each other to establish monopolies and trusts,  allowed these corporations not only to clone life but to create new genetically altered life and then patent that life-form as a novel (unique) property of the corporation and government, it has ruled that children can be vaccinated without parental consent, it has allowed the United Nations to claim a part of the City of New York as international land immune from U.S. law, and seems to not be at all concerned with the thousands of Presidential Directives and Executive Orders that have allowed everything from martial law in America to unmanned drones for the use of killing Americans abroad and spying on them nationally.

Now why in God’s name would I put my trust in this body of “Justices” to do the right thing in protecting me or my country or to  combat the implementation of world governance? They are, after all, appointed by the same president and congress that is allowing it to happen in the first place! They aren’t even voted in by the people who suffer their opinions!!!

So what does it mean to you to” fight for your country”?

Well, you better start comprehending that your country and your state is in the control of a rogue government, and that to save the land the government must not be allowed to expand globally by expanding its ream of paper to include all of the United Nations as it’s master.

The “United States” is in the process of becoming  nothing more than an admiralty law-based “land-bridge” between oceans and countries, a port of call for the world government and its corporations built with your taxpayer money.

And all of this proving the pen is mightier than the sword, simply because the people will not wield the sword as their fore-fathers supposedly did.

In our interview, we discussed that in order to create a new World Government, the current borders of the United States must be destroyed. It is, however, important to state that the individual state governments and borders need not be demolished simply because the Federal government and borders are abolished. It is in fact the contractual nature of the individual states to this central government which is the cause of the loss of individual state sovereignty. As individual republics, under a new United States “union” the country would be no less grand.

Is it only me that feels this way?

…whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness… all experience hath shown, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”

–Constitution of the united states of America

“Whenever the ends of government are perverted, and public liberty manifestly endangered, and all other means of redress are ineffectual, the people may, and of right ought to reform the old, or establish a new government. The doctrine of nonresistance against arbitrary power, and oppression, is absurd, slavish, and destructive of the good and happiness of mankind.”

–New Hampshire Constitution, Article 10 of the Bill of Rights

“All power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority and instituted for their peace, safety, happiness and the protection of property. For the advancement of these ends, they have at all times an inalienable and indefeasible right to alter, reform or abolish their government in such manner as they may deem proper.”

–Kentucky Constitution, Kentucky Bill of Rights

“All power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority and instituted for their peace, safety and happiness. For the advancement of these ends they have at all times an inalienable and indefeasible right to alter, reform or abolish their government in such manner as they may think proper.”

–Pennsylvania Constitution, Article 1, Section 2 of the Declaration of Rights

“3d. That Government ought to be instituted for the common benefit, protection and security of the people; and that the doctrine of non-resistance against arbitrary power and oppression is absurd, slavish, and destructive to the good and happiness of mankind.”

–North Carolina Constitution, November 21, 1789

All political power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority, and instituted for their benefit. The faith of the people of Texas stands pledged to the preservation of a republican form of government, and, subject to this limitation only, they have at all times the inalienable right to alter, reform or abolish their government in such manner as they may think expedient.”

–Texas Constitution, Article 1, Section 2

“Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by rule of law.”

–Universal Declaration Of Human Rights, United Nations (paying lip service to this decree with despicable arrogance and confidence as it subsumes all other constitutions!)

So what part of this aren’t you comprehending?

And just what do you think the 2nd amendment is for?

Better listen to the show now folks, and start to grasp exactly what’s happening in a local, county, district, state, and national government near you. For right this very second, government is doing all of the above for you, on paper, handing over the “country” to a global corporate federation, making the above options of abolition obsolete and unlawful with each treaty and contract your representatives sign, conveying the land to foreign interests…

And remember, just because you don’t see it doesn’t change the fact that it”s happening…

This is what you are truly fighting:

And the future of food (just replace metal powder with protein powder):

Truth is so much stranger than fiction, and so much closer to science fiction than imaginable.

In closing, I can only say that no matter what your “country” means to you; no matter how you define it – I think now would be a good time to start fighting for it while it’s still recognizable as such, and while we still have a resemblance to natural humans.


–Clint Richardson (
–Monday, February 11th, 2013

A World Without Gray – Episode 1

The 1st of my weekly radio shows is officially archived, and free to all.

My special guest: Freeman Burt from Colorado.

Burt’s website:

Join me as we take a stroll through the legal language in a way you’ve never comprehended before. Burt’s recent research projects have revealed the startling conclusion that the 2nd Amendment and natural right to bear “arms” remains strong and untainted, but our willingness to call them legal “firearms” makes them able to be regulated and indeed eventually confiscated by government. It is the clasic battle between lawful vs legal. And it is this voluntary acceptance of Federal contract (license) that puts your lawful guns (arms) at risk as legal “firearms”, and nothing else. Be a man, carry an arm!

We also discuss the fact that when the legal codes are examined, marijuana (i.e. cannabis) is not illegal. In simple terms, a plant alone cannot be a “controlled substance”, nor can it even be a “substance”. However, as with “arms”, we find that every person in jail for marijuana charges is there voluntarily – because they agree that their pot is a substance, not by fact, but by consent to fraud. The prison labor force is full of pot smokers who’ve committed no verifiable crime yet have accepted the government offer of imprisonment for their non-crime. In fact, would it surprise you to learn that federal law states that you may grow up to 100 marijuana plants??? Tune in and shed the fallacies and outright lies of fear and intimidation that is government’s fraudulent U.S. CODE…

Listen here:

Download here:

All archives will also be posted at


Next week’s episode: Royal Bloodlines and Bloodtypes: The true story of the “Founding Fathers” and Presidents of the United States.


–Clint Richardson (
–Saturday, January 26th, 2013

Clint Richardson Hosts New Weekly Radio Show

Archive – listen here:

Episode #1: Burt in Colorado talks about gun and marijuana laws with me.

Download here:


I have been asked to host a show on the “We ROAR” network once a week, produced by the good April Reigne.

No commercials. No restraints. No shock-jocks selling storable food, seeds, and guns while yelling that you are all going to die! And no doomsday predictions to pressure your purchase. Remember, I have nothing to sell.

The show will be called “A World Without Gray”, and will air Thursdays from 4-6pm Pacific Time Zone.

It all starts tomorrow, January 24th,  and you can listen live at:

Or you can listen on ITunes or media players with the link on this page.

My special guest will be free man Burt of Colorado (, bringing you the law as you’ve never heard it before!!! Is marijuana illegal? Are guns as “arms” controlled? The answers will certainly surprise you.

Check back here for this show’s archive. I’ll be posting the show each week in a new post.

Tune in and let’s deconstruct the world in black and white.

Callers welcome…


–Clint Richardson (
–Wednesday, January 23rd, 2013