–=–
CRACKING THE CULT OF THE CONSTITUTION
A three-part essay by: Clint Richardson
–=–

Introduction: The following essay series will be very challenging and controversial for all who read. It is not that the information itself is actually controversial. Instead, the difficulty for most readers is in searching the soul and personally recognizing that the true controversy lies within the individual; a battle of cognitive dissonance where the ego continuously clashes with the true and reasonable self – the natural being grasping for truth. It is a fight between our indoctrinated beliefs and the hard facts and realities that challenge them, causing emotional barriers and fallacy which unhappily overcome comprehension, logic, and reason.

Presented below and in two future parts are facts and images that will challenge the very core of your belief system, from religion to politics, and most importantly to the very founding of this illusion we call the nation and constitution of the United States. For those who have eyes to see, I present this three-part chronicle and true history of the hidden hand that rules through blood, word magic, trickery and deceit – the elicit and eminent powers that be.

Part 1, entitled “Laying The Cornerstone”, covers recent history and the current state of the constitution of the United States, its congressional suspension according to legislative decree, and the powers of the Executive Branch totally outside of and over that constitution through declared national emergency and military rule, as approved by congress (the People) and under the “Lieber Code”. Believing that the constitution still applies as a restriction to government is the greatest hurdle for us to overcome, for this blinding belief blurs reality. The greatest elicit word trickery of the constitution was to make its unconstitutional use constitutional – to exempt government from the law. The question of whether or not this was and is a Christian nation founded by Christian men will also be questioned, as well as the theocratic nature of that Masonic municipal temple called Washington D.C. And the word “oath” will be exposed for what it truly is – a religious pledge to artificial corporate things and never to the actual living people (citizens) of the nation.

Part 2, entitled “Squaring Our History“, will further reveal the ancient Masonic rite of the sacred mystery religions, explore further the oath (holy sacrament), and look at many of the “constitutions” that through the church Masonry has created in the past. Why are certain words capitalized in the constitution? The answer is obvious once this Masonic writing style is examined. We will continue with a shocking and astounding pictorial history that showcases what has been the true power of all governments for thousands of years; never of or actually by the consent of the governed people, but of the Masonic Deistic Rite and its self-declared divine bloodline right to rule. The signs and symbols are everywhere, right before your very eyes, and yet you’ve likely never noticed them before. With a new understanding of just what authority is and where such “eminence” comes from, you will never look at government or its “ecclesiastical” civil doctrine the same.

Part 3, entitled “Compassing The Constitution“, will be a thorough walk-through of the Masonic legal writings of that non-Christian document without the benefit of emotion, false belief, or rose colored glasses – exposing the many fallacies that have become belief in America: the religion-based cult-ure of the constitution. As if reading the constitution for the first time, its true nature and meaning is revealed for the Masonic document it is, leaving no word undefined. And finally with this understanding the question is posed: Would you really sign and be bound by the constitution if it were a private contract?

–=–

In this first chapter, we will barely be scraping the surface of the hidden hand that rules. Instead, we must disseminate the legal foundation of the United States through defined words and statutes. And only when we understand our current state of government and its blatantly  mandated congressional suspension of the constitution before most of us were even born can we then look back to see this was the Masonic plan all along – the true purpose of the founding of the United States.

Please be aware that the concepts of God, gods, the Bible, corporate churches, and the doctrines of religious and other “societies” will be discussed in this presentation. I do not offer my own religious opinion here, and instead only attempt to logically and reasonably decipher how religions are used to righteously and more importantly violently govern the people. In other words, I will be committing the cardinal sin of asking questions – of challenging the rite and the right of the church’s dogma to govern the people, including the Deistic Masonic empire of the Untied States. Each person who reads this will have different levels of understandings, beliefs, emotions, and knowledge about these subjects. They are included herein not for the purposes of debate or persuasion of faith or doctrine, but because they are and always have been the foundation of all governments in world history, including the United States, where the “sovereign” Rulers, Kings, Queens and Officials derive their powers and authority from some form of church and its doctrine, claiming to act as or by whatever god they invoke as the “anointed” head of that church. For the purposes of this essay, your personal belief and faith or lack of it is irrelevant to the context of what is disclosed, for knowledge needs not belief. And clearly religion and the institution of the corporate church cannot be ignored in the history of all past and powerful world governments. It is the true hidden beliefs and faith of those who claim god-like powers in church and state we are to be concerned with here, not your own. The fallacious comparison of the “people” as members of the church or nation has nothing to do with the leadership positions of power and authority within those corporate entities – who claim governmental authority over those members (the people) through “god”. Instead of these doctrine and faith-based hangups, I disclaim here that for the purposes of this presentation, the word God (as capitalized) should be translated to mean the word nature, for God would be the creator of everything in nature if He indeed exists. With this understanding, we can easily see and prove that government is diametrically opposed to nature, natural law, and especially the natural rights of the natural people; and thus by default is actually opposed to God and God’s laws of nature.

Somewhere along the line, be it purposeful or not, a fundamental misunderstanding was promoted by the corporate religious doctrines of government that places mankind above God’s nature and natural law as its dominatrix with an irresponsible domination (dominion) over the earth, as opposed to acting as its steward and caretaker; giving rise to the entire religious corporate machine that violates nature at every turn; pumping dry its blood, tainting its life-affirming waters with pollution and poison, disrespecting and incrementally obliterating most of its lifeforms, and altering its function and landscape to the point that said “Creator” would not today recognize His own creation. This promoted doctrine of those who care more for the after-life than for theirs and others (the people’s) natural life here on Earth makes the church a poor candidate to govern the earth we all live upon and depend on for our natural lives, rights, and delicate balance of resources.

Thus the readers ego and righteousness, if possible, should be laid aside before continuing for the purposes of absorbing knowledge – so as to see the world without filters…

For those who would prematurely dismiss the absolute domination and importance of religion (the church) and Ecclesiastical law within our United States government, or for that matter any and all governments around the world, you of all people should read the following information, which proves that this Ecclesiastical legal doctrine is the only governmental law that actually exists. For your belief or non-belief matters about zero percent as to what is the foundation and “authority” of law.

I recommend, due to the length and importance of the following information, images, and future parts, that you copy and paste this essay for safe keeping. This is a free, un-copyrighted, educational endeavor that may be shared and re-posted for educational purposes. Please feel free to turn it into a (free/non-profit) documentary movie or other alternative media venture. No permission is needed from myself.

–Clint Richardson

———————————————————————————–
Part 1: Laying The Cornerstone
———————————————————————————–

–=–

“Knowledge makes a man unfit to be a slave.”

–Frederick Douglass–

–=–

I believe the above quote to be a self-evident truth…

Inversely, I find it self-evident that belief is the opposite of knowledge, and that some slaves believe themselves to be free – a people indentured and destroyed by nothing more or less than their lack of knowledge mixed with a belief in government-granted liberty as the source of their God-given natural rights.

Unfortunately it seems that most “citizens” in the United States have no knowledge of their own place in this indentured society, or that they are unilaterally indebted to it. Most minds are harvested before they can read or write into de facto (illegitimate) contractual servitude called “citizenship” to the United States – a compact entered into before the age of reason and consent – reenforced via adult  “Selective Service” registration as government cannon fodder and chattel at the whim of a president’s pen. And America sits as a lady in waiting, plastered over in ink on paper; a land hidden by corporatism.

Meanwhile, a plague of manufactured history is spread over the true nature and founding of that United States central government; a false, fabled paradigm inbred and instilled from birth and throughout the education system, sponsored and even required by the very government who wishes to keep its true disposition a secret.

It is the purpose of this multi-part research project to show conclusively the true hidden foundation (Cornerstone) of the United States, who the “People, in Order” of so-called “Founding Fathers” really were, and exactly what the “constitution” is. For all we have learned is nothing if not the provided doctrine and entertainment of a ruling class in that government that absolutely depends on the non-dissemination of the nation’s true history and origin.

Enter-tain-ment is defined from its Latin origins as “to enter (enter) and hold (tain) the mind (mentis)”.

And the word govern-ment?

–=–

“Wars in old times were made to get slaves.
The modern implement of imposing slavery is debt.”

–Ezra Pound

–=–

Today, the entire world has been enslaved by imposed government (public) debt, a requirement of “citizens” in the many international debt-slave colonies called “countries”.

It is imperative to comprehend what the “founding fathers” that created this govern-ment via their constitution believed through their own writings and associations, not your own. For it was their belief system and their “Fraternal Brotherhood” of Freemasonry that created this union, not yours. They were “the People” (capitalized in the constitution as a proper noun), not you and I as “the common people”.

I realize that this is a bold statement; and thanks to entertainment and history (His – Story), one worth reasonable doubt until proven. This goal is the purpose of the following information and the very long  journey that led me here to piece it all together.

Today I challenge the great American fallacy called patriotism that governs the minds of the controlled citizenry. I challenge the very nature of this central government and its right to claim religious eminence and dominion over an otherwise free people. I challenge its Army, its Navy, its Air Force, its Marines, and its Maritime international corporate flag. I challenge its FBI, its CIA, its IRS, and all of its de facto (illegitimate) Executive Cabinet departments (none of which are elected by the American people) that, through Executive military authority (permission) supposedly granted by the very people for whom it enslaves, enforces the laws created by that government. And I challenge the certainly unfounded belief by the masses of people who live under that power of authority supposedly granted by the constitution of the United States to give license to that government the authority (permission) to hold, harm, extort, rape, and kill any man, woman, or child, both foreign and domestic. For a piece of paper has not a human mind or voice to grant anything.

–=–

Nationalism is the propagandist key to maintain govern-ment.
Enter-tain-ment is essential to hide the reality of govern-ment
and to promote the fallacy of Nationalism.

–=–

Without faithful believers in its legitimacy, any cult must surely perish…

And without voluntary citizens as military soldiers, government’s legal codes and authority diminish absent that violent force of blind obedience to back up forcefully its necessarily tyrannical laws. For law is only as corrupt as the men who have license to practice and especially enforce that law, those who do so under the guise of God’s name – IN GOD WE TRUST. Of course, it goes without saying that government wishes its ground troops to be as void of knowledge as possible, snatching their enlisted straight out of low income high schools – paying for their indoctrination within its own universities – an education system purposefully dumbed down and lacking true knowledge and independence so as to create such potential unthinking soldiers without knowledge, opportunity, or choice.

And so today I seek to lift your own veil, if you will permit the revolution of your mind over its righteous state of enshrined belief. For it is my intent to break the people of America free from this mindless, self-destructive Cult of the Constitution.

–=–
Patriotism:
The Arrogance Of Ignorance
–=–

In America, our distorted history makes our people literally worship the United States Flag (a slightly altered corporate symbol of the former East India Company) while turning their backs on the natural lands of America. The people then thoughtlessly Pledge Allegiance to that corporate flag by reciting a poem written by a proclaimed socialist. Many even attend sports games in Roman style coliseums and, with no understanding of the origins of their hand over heart gesture, sing a nationalist praise before every game to the flag of the tyrannical govern-ment that enslaves them through debt contract.

As our first example of how the absolutely fictitious national beliefs by the people have created a mass cultural psychosis of fallacy within our American culture (cult-ure), due simply to a lack of historical knowledge, lets examine the true origins of this supposed American classic…

Have you ever asked yourself: Why do I pledge allegiance, and to what exactly do I blindly pledge it?

Does an inanimate object (idol) such as a Flag really need or care about your devotion to it?

Perhaps it’s time to uncover and expose this history…

American Flag vs. British East India Company Flag

–=–

“Music written by Brother John Stafford Smith (1750-1836)
of Inverness Lodge #4 in London was, at one time, used
by an Irish Masonic Orphans’ Home as their song. 
Later it became a popular drinking song for many years
known as To Anacreon in Heaven. Then, some years later,
the music was adopted by Francis Scott Key to which he wrote
the words to our National Anthem,  The Star Spangled Banner.”

–‘The Truth is Stranger than Fiction’, by Alphonse Cerza,
Masonic Service Association, 1967.

–=–

Anacreon singing his poetry

Anacreon (Greek: Ἀνακρέων, gen.: Ἀνακρέοντος) (582 BC – 485 BC)
a Greek lyric poet, notable for his drinking songs and hymns.
Later Greeks included him in the canonical list of nine lyric poets.

–=–

The original Pledge of Allegiance printed in the “Official Programme” circa 1892
**Notice here the capitalized words “Flag, Republic, Nation, Liberty, and Justice”.
This is the classic Masonic writing style (capitalization). More on this in Part 2.

Below we see the incremental stage between the change over to a hand over heart gesture… It is actually quite humorous to be conditioned to actually think that placing our hand over our heart is any less significant or strange than placing our stiff-arms in the air, communist-style.

And then there are the unfounded beliefs:

Compared to the true knowledge:

–=–
Pledge, Or Else…
–=–

In the case of West Virginia State Board Of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 (1943), we read that this pledge of stiff-armed allegiance was not simply a choice by our children, but instead a requirement punishable by expulsion from the school system for “insubordination” in true communist fashion:

“The Board of Education on January 9, 1942, adopted a resolution containing recitals taken largely from the Court’s Gobitis opinion and ordering that the salute to the flag become ‘a regular part of the program of activities in the public schools,’ that all teachers and pupils ‘shall be required to participate in the salute honoring the Nation represented by the Flag; provided, however, that refusal to salute the Flag be regarded as an Act of insubordination, and shall be dealt with accordingly.’ [319 U.S. 624, 627]  The resolution originally required the ‘commonly accepted salute to the Flag‘ which it defined. Objections to the salute as ‘being too much like Hitler’s’ were raised by the Parent and Teachers Association, the Boy and Girl [319 U.S. 624, 628]  Scouts, the Red Cross, and the Federation of Women’s Clubs. Some modification appears to have been made in deference to these objections, but no concession was made to Jehovah’s Witnesses. What is now required is the ‘stiff-arm’ salute, the saluter to keep the right hand raised with palm turned up while the following is repeated: ‘I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of [319 U.S. 624, 629]  America and to the Republic for which it stands; one Nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.'”

(***Notice that the word “God” is not included in the Pledge within this ruling, as the words “under God” were not added until 11 years after this court case, in the year 1953.)

“Failure to conform is ‘insubordination’ dealt with by expulsion. Readmission is denied by statute until compliance. Meanwhile the expelled child is ‘unlawfully absent‘ and may be proceeded against as a delinquent. His parents or guardians are liable to prosecution, and if convicted are subject to fine not exceeding $50 and jail term not exceeding thirty days.”

–=–

Now, does this requirement to say an oath to the United States flag sound like patriotism to you… or communism?

Listen to what this royal bloodline cousin of kings and presidents had to say:

“…at a meeting of Boy Scouts, presided over by the veteran founder of that organization, Colonel Dan Beard, the writer heard the thousand or more, standing at attention, shout “I pledge allegiance to my flag” and the rest of the words. In answer to his questions, Colonel Beard said: “Why, that’s said by the Boy Scouts every time they have a roundup, big or little—and for that matter, by the Pioneer Girls and the Campfire Girls too. It’s the A B C of training for citizenship. It was adopted from the public schools when the Scouts first started in 1905 — they didn’t have to learn it; it’s their regular hurrah for flag and country. I’ve heard it for nearly twenty years, from the top of Michigan to the toe of Florida, and from Montana back to New York again. The youngsters of every race say it and it makes Americans of them.”

(Source: University of Rochester Dept. of Education, http://www.lib.rochester.edu/index.cfm?PAGE=3418)

What makes a child an American? Is it natural birthright (being natural-born)? Is it naturalization? Is it blood?

No, it is their pledge (oath) to a corporate flag as good little citizen soldiers…

The Wehrmacht Oath of Loyalty to Adolf Hitler, 2 August 1934, was pledged:

“I swear by God this sacred oath that to the Leader of the German empire and people, Adolf Hitler, supreme commander of the armed forces, I shall render unconditional obedience and that as a brave soldier I shall at all times be prepared to give my life for this oath.”

The current oath of enlisted soldiers of the United States also pledges:

“I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.” (Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5 October 1962).

–=–

Notice that these oaths by Nazi and U.S. military soldiers are not to protect the common people within the nation (whom in the United States are referred to as possible domestic “enemies of the State” in the “Trading With The Enemies Act”). Instead, these oaths only swear (or affirm in the U.S) to protect the United States government, its president, and its officers. This is an oath to protect the continuity of government against you, whoever you are; all 7 billion of you on Earth and including all U.S. citizens…

The constitution is the foundation of government, so allegiance to that piece of paper (charter) – as with worshiping its flag – is not allegiance in any way to the actual living, breathing, common people. The constitution did not create the people. The people were here long before the constitution. Creation is an act of God and/or nature, and the people of course existed long before the language of the constitution was created by men of a certain blood. The constitution in fact created govern-ment (control) of those people (men) who were first created of nature (God), creating in them each an artificial person. In other words, the constitution is not of nature (not created naturally), and is actually against nature and against the Bible (more on this later). The president is also but an office held by a government person (Corporation Sole) as designated by the constitution. And the enemies are not enemies of the people, but enemies against the continuity of government (control) of the people as a body politic and its corporate world-wide monopolies – including citizens and non-citizens (all natural people). Thus these United States oaths taken by military men and women are to protect artificial constructs, not real people. These are strawman oaths in that they are pledges to artificial persons and things.

–=–
A False Oath To The
Incorporation Of Souls
–=–

What is the purpose of becoming a Corporation Sole?

The first known Corporation Sole (to my current knowledge) was established by the Church of England in the year 1448. It is always and can only be legitimately established under an Ecclesiastical (religious law) body within its proper form.

Ecclesiastical Law was called the “Cannons of the Church” – a play on words so as to not actually use the word “law”. These “Canons” were essentially the forced adherence of the people by the State to matters of religious conscious by law (Canon). In other words, mind control. In order to guarantee that the ownership of real property was continued to be held by the Church outside of the control of the State, the concept of “Corporation Sole” was created as a legal fictional (artificial) person of the Church – a spiritual assembly, if you will. In the end, these Corporations Sole represent eternal life in an artificial legal capacity. In other words, the office for which the Corporation Sole creates is passed from living man to living man (or woman), who then becomes the Sole fiction of that office. The real property and political (ecclesiastical) powers are transferred or “conveyed” with the Corporation Sole to the new officer (soul).

Sound confusing? Well it’s supposed to. For you are not supposed to be a party to or have even a basic knowledge of this common law elitist privilege.

In a way, since the Corporation Sole has no need of a board of directors or other typical corporate charter requirements, you could say that this incorporation creates a “Sovereignty” – a dictatorship of one. It is called a Corporation “Sole” in reverence to the sole individual “soul” who fills the corporation.

The “Queen of England” as an office is a Corporation Sole overseen by the sole officer (the current living Queen), and its ministry is the government/church of England who allowed its creation within Ecclesiastical law. Many of the “Secretaries of State” in England are also individual Corporations Sole. The office of British Monarch in each Commonwealth Realm is also an individual and separate Corporation Sole. Thus, each time the Queen travels to one of her Commonwealth countries, she is doing so as a separate and unique officer (Corporation Sole) in each country – and is all but immune to that countries statutory base of legislative or parliamentary laws. For instance, in general and while in England, Queen Elizabeth II is the artificial person (Corporation Sole) named “Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the United Kingdom”. Remember, this is the name of her corporation. But when governing (controlling) the Commonwealth of Canada, she takes the corporate role of “Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada” – a completely separate Corporation Sole. In Australia she is “Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Australia”. Again, these are all separate individual Corporations Sole.

Interestingly, because both Canada and Australia are politically established as “Federal” governments, the Queen also has individually distinct Corporations Sole for each “Province” of those two countries. When dealing specifically with the local government in Alberta, Canada, she switches corporate hats once again and becomes “Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Alberta”, and again for every other Province thereof. And when the Queen dies or advocates her throne, she will simply sign over here many Corporations Sole and all the “Rights” of real property (including whole continents) to the next bloodline Monarch (man or woman) in succession, likely her eldest  son.

A Bishop in the Vatican (Church of Rome) is also acting as a Corporation Sole, where the current office of Bishop is the sole officer and its ministry is the Church of Rome. The office of “The Arch Bishop of Canterbury” is also an individual Corporation Sole of the Church. And of course the many Catholic Churches spread across the nations are also in utilization of Corporations Sole.

The Office (corporation) of the “The Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Later-day Saints” is also a Corporation Sole, where the office of the President is the sole officer and its ministry (people) is The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. And this explains a lot… like why for so many years I could never find a Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) for the “Mormon Church” corporation and its corporate holdings. For a Corporation Sole is not required to follow the Statutes that require such financial disclosure and auditing as other incorporated entities are!

Cities, districts, counties, and states, as well as the Federal government and its agencies are not Corporations Sole. They are bound by Statutory laws and must file a CAFR (independently audited “annual financial report”) and represent a multi-faceted “body politic” in their incorporation and are not of a “church”. Microsoft and Apple Corporations are also not Corporations Sole, for all of these have more than one person (i.e. president, vice-president, secretary, etc.).

But most importantly, this does not necessarily preclude the fact that the individual officers, including Bill Gates and the presidents of the United States, CEO’s, and political officers (legislators) of corporations and governments themselves are not individually acting under their own Corporation Sole instead of as real people (mankind).

In the United States today, the legal status called Corporation Sole is completely tax-exempt, is exclusively under common law (immune from laws called “statute”), and is recognized by all 50 states as such. It has to be, you see, or else states would not be able to recognize their own representatives who are acting under this capacity as individual Corporations Sole (representatives). You might say that this makes politicians immune from their own created laws (statutes). Like me, you may have often wondered why those in government get away with literal murder and organized crime under the “color” of office under the United States.

Now you know…

A Corporation Sole is perhaps best understood as an “unincorporated corporation”, where an individual (no employees) is the only person involved, making all decisions for the Corporation Sole without opposition, and having no corporate bylaws required (which are statutory and not requirements of or in the common law). By unincorporated I mean to say that the Corporation Sole is not officially a legal status granted by government, but instead one granted by an Ecclesiastical church/religion. Though its roots are steeped in antiquity, the Corporation Sole has ecclesiastically been used by the higher members of the church (government) for many centuries. The Pope, his Cardinals, and his Bishops are all individual Corporations Sole. The Royal Family and their representatives such as Prime Ministers are also individual Corporations Sole. And entities in United States politics such as “President Obama”, “Representative Ron Paul”, Governors, and other congressmen and the Vice President and Cabinet Heads are also individual Corporations Sole. They are acting under an Ecclesiastical (religion-based) office, which is for all intents and purposes immune to government’s legal Codes – the laws which they help to create for the rest of the “people”.

Ron Paul, for instance, is listed as a traded corporation on Dunn & Bradstreet (DNB.com) under these business listings:

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, UNITED STATES
Also Traded as RON PAUL
203 CANNON HOUSE OFC BLDG, WASHINGTON, DC

CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES
Also Traded as RON PAUL
203 CANNON HOUSE BUILDING, WASHINGTON, DC

Link–>http://creditreports.dnb.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/IballValidationCmd?storeId=11154&catalogId=71154&searchType=BSF&busName=ron%20paul&state=DC&country=US&cm_mmc=dnb-_-home-_-retail-_-lookup_-topbar#goTop

These are the Corporations Sole for Ron Paul.

How about the President of the United States?

EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT
Also Traded as BARACK H OBAMA
725 17TH ST NW, WASHINGTON, DC

Ok. Here is the corporation that is the Office of the President, but what about Obama himself as a “Sole”?

OBAMA, BARRACK HUSSEIN
1600 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW, WASHINGTON, DC

Link–>http://creditreports.dnb.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/IballValidationCmd?storeId=11154&catalogId=71154&searchType=BSF&busName=president%20obama&state=DC&country=US&cm_mmc=dnb-_-home-_-retail-_-lookup_-topbar#goTop

It is important to note that if we check back here in 2017 after the next presidential election, this corporation known as “EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT” will then read to be “Also Traded as _____ __ _______”. In other words, it will be traded as whomever the next president as Corporation Sole will be when the office is passed in succession by Obama to his cousin and bloodline successor.

After all, a man cannot be “traded”. That would be slavery.

But the artificial person (Corporation Sole) is not a man – it is a thing.

For further understanding, let’s read from Black’s Law 1st. edition:

CORPORATION SOLE. A corporation consisting of one person only, and his successors in some particular station, who are incorporated by law in order to give them some legal capacities and advantages, particularly that of perpetuity, which in their natural persons they could not have had. In this sense, the sovereign in England is a sole corporation, so is a bishop, so are some deans distinct from their several chapters, and so is every parson and vicar. A corporation sole consists of a single person, who is made a body corporate and politic, in order to give him some legal capacities and advantages, and especially that of perpetuity; as a bishop, dean, etc.

Black’s 5th Edition states:

Corporation sole. Unusual type of corporation consisting of only one person whose successor becomes the corporation on his death or resignation; limited in the main today to bishops and heads of dioceses.”

And we can read from the Massachusetts Supreme Court, in the case of “The Overseers of the Poor of the City of Boston v. David Sears 39 Mass (2Pick) 122 at 128 (1839)”:

“…the distinction between an aggregate and sole corporation, growing out of the different modes of constitution and forms of action, is striking and obvious. A bishop or parsons acting in a corporate capacity and holding property to him and his successor in right of office, has no need of a corporate name, he performs all legal acts under his own seal, in his own name and name of office; his own will alone regulates his acts, needs no treasurer, for he has no personal property except the rents and proceeds for the corporate estate, and these he takes to his own use when received. By-laws are unnecessary, for he regulates his own action, by his own will and judgment, like any other individual acting in his own right. These examples are sufficient to clarify the legal distinctions between the two classes of corporations.”

The question we should be asking is this: If a Corporation Sole is religious or “ecclesiastical” in origin, how is a government that promotes separation of church and state – a government supposedly without a declared central religion – able to form such religious Corporations Sole?

Is there a hidden or “Mystery” religion from which this ability to Ecclesiastically incorporate originates within said United States corporation?

The answer to that question represents the thesis put forward in this essay series; to uncover and prove a theocracy where one seemingly and supposedly does not exist…

–=–

Religion:

“Man’s relation to Divinity, to reverence, worship, obedience, and submission to mandates and precepts of supernatural or superior beings. In its broadest sense includes all forms of belief in the existence of superior beings exercising power over human beings by volition, imposing rules of conduct, with future rewards and punishments. Bond uniting man to GOD, and a virtue whose purpose is to render GOD worship due him as source of all being and principle of all government of things“

“Nikulnikoff v. Archbishop, etc., of Russian Orthodox Greek Catholic Church, 142 Misc. 894, 255 N.Y.S. 653, 663.”

–Black’s Law: 5th Edition

–=–

Are you contractually bonded to the United States’ religion of law;
a government that claims to rule through God?

Perhaps you should read that definition once more…

We will read this legal definition again at the end of Part 1, after the
knowledge contained within will make its meaning much more clear.

–=–

In short, these “oaths” taken by United States (not American) soldiers as seen above are no different than the blind pledge of allegiance taken by school children to an inanimate object called a flag. Through the illusion of nationalism and patriotism, the majority of these men and women of the military have no idea that their pledge is to an artificial municipal corporation named Washington D.C, and to the artificial “Corporations Sole” who occupy it. This oath is not to their actual living family, their friends, America, and Americans or to any of “the people”.

Interestingly, all of these oaths include God as their witness, though those who took the German Oath of Loyalty did not have the choice to make an affirmation (an oath not of or under God) as the United States oath offers.

Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856, defines these important religious and non-religious acts as specifically opposite from one another:

OATH. A declaration made according to law, before a competent tribunal or officer, to tell the truth; or it is the act of one who, when lawfully required to tell the truth, takes God to witness that what he says is true. It is a religious act by which the party invokes God not only to witness the truth and sincerity of his promise, but also to avenge his imposture or violated faith, or in other words to punish his perjury if he shall be guilty of it. 2. It is proper to distinguish two things in oaths; (1.) The invocation by which the God of truth, who knows all things, is taken to witness. (2.) The imprecation by which he is asked as a just and all-powerful being, to punish perjury. 3. The commencement of an oath is made by the party taking hold of the book, after being required by the officer to do so, and ends generally with the words,”so help you God,” and kissing the book, when the form used is that of swearing on the Evangelists. 4. Oaths are taken in various forms; the most usual is upon the Gospel by taking the book in the hand; the words commonly used are, “You do swear that, ” & “so help you God,” and then kissing the book. The origin of this oath may be traced to the Roman law, and the kissing the book is said to be an imitation of the priest’s kissing the ritual as a sign of reverence, before he reads it to the people.  5. Another form is by the witness or party promising holding up his right hand while the officer repeats to him,”You do swear by Almighty God, the searcher of hearts, that… “And this as you shall answer to God at the great day.” 6. In another form of attestation commonly called an affirmation, the officer repeats, “You do solemnly, sincerely, and truly declare and affirm, that,” (i.e. without God)… 7. The oath, however, may be varied in any other form, in order to conform to the religious opinions of the person who takes it…

(**Note that these definitions in Bouvier’s and Black’s Law dictionaries include “case law” references, meaning these definitions are paraphrases of actual court decisions and opinions. For the purposes of this essay, those references have been removed for ease of reading and comprehension. See dictionaries for case references.)

Here we see that the oath is in all accounts a religious test and sacrament. And it is important to note that one who does not fear God or who swears to another god or Deity will not be at all worried about lying under oath upon the Bible, for if the devil truly exists, that “lord of lies” would surely require perjury from its followers.

AFFIRMANT, practice. One who makes affirmation instead of making oath that the evidence which he is about to give shall be the truth, as if he had been sworn. He is liable to all the pains and penalty of perjury, if he shall be guilty of willfully and maliciously violating his affirmation.

AFFIRMATION, practice. A solemn declaration and asseveration, which a witness makes before an officer, competent to administer an oath in a like case, to tell the truth, as if be had been sworn. 2. In the United States, generally, all witnesses who declare themselves conscientiously scrupulous against taking a corporal oath, are permitted to make a solemn affirmation, and this in all cases, as well criminal as civil. 3. In England, laws have been enacted which partially relieve persons who, have conscientious scruples against taking an oath, and authorize them to make affirmation. In France, the laws which allow freedom of religious opinion, have received the liberal construction that all persons are to be sworn or affirmed according to the dictates of their consciences; and a quaker’s affirmation has been received and held of the same effect as an oath. 4. The form is to this effect: “You, A B, do solemnly, sincerely, and truly declare and affirm…” For the violation of the truth in such case, the witness is subject to the punishment of perjury” as if he had been sworn. 5. Affirmation also means confirming; as, an affirmative statute.

–=–
The Hypocritical Affirmation Of
The Mormon Corporation Sole
–=–

For the purposes of this research, remember that to affirm in the Untied States jurisdiction is to purposefully not swear an oath under the Biblical Christian “God”, and more specifically to not be under the punishment or wrath of that “God” for perjury in this life and/or in the “after-life”. Of course, religious leaders and politicians with no irony or hesitation often choose to be affirmed in court cases and in congress instead of being sworn in under “God”. This is no irony, but a purposeful deceit to purger or withhold information from a government that protects that act of purger through the act of affirmation. Affirmation is dishonesty masked under a false legal status of credibility, and it is a choice often made by men who take the mark of Corporations Sole.

It is one thing for a random man to affirm due to his contentions with organized religion, it is a whole other can of worms when it is the leader or president of a corporate religion who chooses to affirm in court instead of swearing to tell the truth with God as his witness and accept His wrath for perjury…

In the case of the corporation called the Mormon Church, we have the incredible revelations of the Reed Smoot Senate hearing as a perfect example…

When then president of the Mormon “church”, Mr. Joseph F. Smith, was called to testify before Congress in 1906, he was requested by the Senate to “swear in”. Instead, he is quoted below as stating in the congressional record that “I prefer to affirm, if you please.” In other words, the supposedly Christian Mormon President and current “Prophet” of God incarnate wished not to swear to that God that he would tell the truth underGod’s wrath. Of course he was likely doing so as an artificial “Corporation Sole”. The record then directly states, “Joseph F. Smith, having duly affirmed, testifies as follows…“.

Having avoided the wrath of God for perjury, the clever “prophet” Smith was free to lie and obfuscate without God in the name of his Corporation.

The following is from the official transcript of that Senate hearing and makes for a very interesting read:

Why such an official protest from the electors of the States?

“We… protest: that Apostle Reed Smoot, Senator elect from the State of Utah…
ought not be permitted to qualify by taking the oath of office or to sit as a
Member of the United States Senate, for reasons effecting the honor
and dignity of the United States and their Senators in Congress.”

Why?

“Ruling Authorities” of the Mormon Church claim:
“…Supreme authority, divinely mentioned, to shape the belief and control
the conduct under them in all matters whatsoever, civil and religious,
temporal and spiritual, and who uniting in themselves
authority in church and state…”

**In other words, a Mormon’s oath to the Church takes
precedent over their oath to the country, the same reason that those
in the know today do not wish Mitt Romney to obtain the seat of President.

How?

“Men who hold the (Mormon) priesthood possess divine authority to act for God,
and by possessing part of God’s power they are in reality part of God…
those who reject it (the priesthood bestowed by the church), reject God.”

Mormon / Masonic Sunstone (Sun worship).

Mormon Church (Assembly Hall)  inside of “Temple Square”,
The Mormon corporate headquarters or “Vatican” of Salt Lake City

Joseph Smith’s Book of Mormon speaks of the restoration of Israel:

“And it came to pass that I, Nephi, spake much unto them
concerning these things; yea, I spake unto them concerning
the restoration of the Jews in the latter days.”

“And I did rehearse unto them the words of Isaiah, who spake
concerning the restoration of the Jews, or of the house of Israel;
and after they were restored they should no more be confounded,
neither should they be scattered again.”

–=–

During the 1930s and 1940s, Mormon Senators William King and
Elbert Thomas were both Democrats from Utah.
Both men were fervent Christian Zionists.

**Zionism is support for the illegal “State” of Israel.
Clandestinely though, Zionism’s goal is to reestablish the
“Kingdom of Jerusalem” and rebuild Solomon’s Temple.

For the Star of David is actually the ancient Seal of Solomon…

As we will soon realize, this is the goal of all
Masonic religions and societies worldwide.

Senator Thomas visited Jerusalem in 1912.
According to his diary, he sat on the Mount of Olives and read from the
writings of early Mormon leader Orson Hyde about the Jews:

“Consecrate this land for the gathering together of Judah’s
scattered remnants, for the building up of Jerusalem again
after it has been trodden down by the Gentiles so long.
Restore the kingdom unto Israel, raise up Jerusalem as its capitol.”

Mormon Senator William King was one of the founding members
of the American Palestine Committee – an organization set up
in the 1930s to rally Christian support for Jewish statehood.

Sen. Thomas developed close ties to Benzion Netanyahu,
who in those days was director of the
Revisionist Zionists’ American division.

David Ben Gurion, first president of the Israeli “State” from 1948 stated:

“You know, there are no people in the world
who understand the Jews like the Mormons.”

–=–

As part of the Reed Smoot case, it was necessary to ascertain for the record the incredible monopolies of private corporations that were held and operated by the Mormon Church and its leadership, including Union Pacific Railroad, and that was also acting as the government of Utah. It is shocking to consider the power of this religious incorporation then, especially when considering how much it has grown in the last 100 years. For instance, the Mormon corporation named “Bonneville Communications” just a decade ago owned a virtual monopoly on every talk radio station in Washington D.C. before selling (privatizing) them to other Mormons – members by blood in that Masonic Brotherhood of the Church – to give the appearance that the corporation of the Church no longer held that monopoly.

In government, this is called privatization.

We read this incredible admission in the senate record, as stated officially by the affirmed and arrogant president of the Church Joseph F. Smith. Note that Smith is the “Successor” of the previous “prophets” and presidents of the church, signifying the passing of not only the Corporation Sole, but the claim of divinity and rule by and through God, as stated below, “…endowed with all the powers that they were possessed of”:

Not Ironically, the Sheriff of Salt Lake County is none other than a Mormon descendent named Jim Winder of the aforementioned Winder in this case, whose brother is a City Mayor, and whose Mormon family have 10 generations in politics in Utah.

You can read about my personal battles to try and expose what Sheriff Winder has done to Salt Lake County in my research article and documentary below:

Article – “The Sheriff Who Sold His County”

Link–>https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2011/05/22/the-sheriff-who-sold-his-county/

And also view my lecture about special districts
taking over lawful government in a County near you

–=–
The United States Theocracy
–=–

If the sudden realization of the true communist nature of the American “Pledge of Allegiance” to the Untied States is surprising to you, especially if you are a parent today, then I hope this new knowledge will be enough to move you to continue down this rabbit hole and finish reading the information that I have provided here. Imagine the shock you might feel if the history of the constitution and its so-called “founding fathers” were also revealed to be something quite different than what you’ve always imagined or learned – what your children are learning today in required government schools. What other beliefs might be promoted in our government funded schools, Universities, and media monopolies that realize their origins in a similar form of communism and fascism? And what if I were to tell you that I can conclusively show you today that the United States is not nor ever has been a republic, a democracy, nor any other political moniker… but is instead and always has been a clandestine (hidden) theocracy?

THEOCRACY. A species of government which claims to be immediately directed by God… Religion, which in former times, frequently associated itself with despotism, to reign, by its power, or under its shadow, has sometimes attempted to reign alone, and this she has called the reign of God, theocracy. –Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856

THEOCRACY. Government of a state by the immediate direction of God, (or by the assumed direction of a supposititious divinity), or the state thus governed. –Black’s Law Dictionary, 4rth Edition

A “State thus governed (controlled)” by those who claim to be directed by God or some god-like divinity or deity…

Sounds about accurate when considering the righteously pompous men who rule (as Corporations Sole) with impunity against the will of mankind in the Untied States, doesn’t it? After all, when was the last time Congress or the president acted upon the will of the people as opposed to the will of the corporate world?

Is the United States constitution, its form of government, and its political leadership really the first government in world history to not be ordained by and head the Holy church? Is its power really based on “we, the common people”? Or is that authority in fact based on a higher power than man, so as to be a (Masonic/Deist) theocracy? And did the “Founding Fathers” create the United States and its constitution under God… or under affirmation?

The answers to these questions and evidence provided herein will certainly surprise you.

–=–
Is Freemasonry a religion?
–=–

Well, it depends on whom you ask. For designated corporate religions are bound by laws (Statutes), while Orders make their own.

The Supreme Court of Nebraska decided that:

“The guiding thought (of Masonry) is not religion but religious toleration …. The Masonic fraternity refrains from intruding into the field of religion and confines itself to the teaching of morality and duty to one’s fellow men, which makes better men and better citizens… The distinction is clear between such ethical teachings and the doctrines of religion. One cannot espouse a religion without belief and faith in its peculiar doctrines. A fraternity broad enough to take in and cover with its mantle Christian, Moslem and Jew, without requiring him to renounce his religion, is not a religious organization, although its members may join in prayer which, in the case of each, is a petition addressed to his own Deity. Neither can the belief in the immortality of the soul be denominated religious in the sense that it is typical of any religion, of any race, or of any age. It constitutes one of the most beautiful and consoling features of our own religion, but it is equally found in almost every other. It is so unusual and spontaneous that it is not so much belief or dogma as it is an instinct of the human soul. Neither does it imply or require adherence to any system of religious worship… The fact that belief in the doctrines or deity of no particular religion is required, of itself refutes the theory that the Masonic ritual embodies a religion, or that its teachings are religious.”

–“Let There Be Light”, by Alphonse Cerza, The Masonic Service Association, 1983.

–=–

But when it comes to saving a few shekels by keeping a tax-exempt status and protecting their property, the Masons are quite happy to be named as a pseudo “religion”:

SCOTTISH RITE CATHEDRAL vs. ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES et al.

LINK–>http://law.justia.com/cases/california/court-of-appeal/2007/b194230.html

“Freemasonry is a religion – a California appeals court ruled on Oct 3, and its adherents must be given equal standing as other faiths under US law.  In a case involving the Los Angeles Scottish Rite Cathedral and the City of Los Angeles, the Seventh District Court of Appeals in Los Angeles held it could not distinguish between “the earnest pursuit of [Masonic] principles… from more widely acknowledged modes of religious exercise” such as Christianity or Judaism.

The Court was asked to hear the Freemasons appeal of a lower court’s ruling that the City of Los Angeles could regulate the use of the Masonic cathedral. The Scottish Rite Freemasons argued that while they were not a formal “religion”, their property should however be exempted from government regulation to the same degree that churches were exempted so as to allow them the free “religious exercise”.

They cited the US Federal law the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 in support of their contention, saying it prohibits a government from implementing a land use regulation in a way that “imposes a substantial burden” on one’s “religious exercise.”

The Court held that it could find “no decisions analyzing whether Masonic practices are sufficiently religious in nature to qualify for protection” under law.

However it used the test adopted by the courts in the case of the US v Meyers that presented a five-pronged test in defining whether a creed or belief was a “religious belief” and determined it was a religion.

“Although Freemasonry does not identify itself as a religion” the Court stated “it plainly fosters principles and practices that resemble religious exercise.””

This is a brilliant circumvention of law here, where the Masonic Rite is considered a religion for certain legal purposes by a Masonic (BAR) Judge, but inversely is not required to register and incorporate as a religion. This is like a man being granted women’s rights status while remaining a legal man.

Interestingly, that five-pronged test listed in this court case is sourced to include:

“The Meyers court adopted a multi-part test inquiring into (1) the ultimate ideas embraced by the asserted belief; (2) metaphysical ideas addressing transcendence of the physical world; (3) moral or ethical systems constraining an adherent’s conduct; (4) comprehensiveness of beliefs; and (5) accoutrements of religion such as a founder or teacher, important writings, gathering places, keepers of knowledge, ceremonies and rituals, structure and propagation or recruitment.  (U.S. v. Meyers, supra, 906 F.Supp. at  pp. 1502-1503.)”

Thus, Masonry is protected as if it were a religion and accepts the benefits thereof, even though it vehemently opposes the legal title and statutes that bind a corporate “religion”.

Sadly, the same could honestly be said of many members of supposedly Christian incorporated religions today…

–=–

“In 1952, eighty-nine percent of the U.S. Supreme Court Justices were Freemasons.”

–‘10,000 Famous Freemasons’, by William R. Denslow

–=–
Our Citizenship To The
Temple Of The United States
–=–

As painful as these above images are with regards to the origins of this childhood indoctrination process of public education, blind allegiance, and the forced patriotism and nationalism that most of us have unwittingly participated in – contributing ever so much to our collective lack of knowledge and its side-effect of servitude –  it is still more troubling to be in the position I’m in at this very moment. For with knowledge comes duty; the natural pull on ones senses to inform ones fellow man of a clear and present danger that is literally killing and enslaving my people and, militarily, millions and likely soon to be billions across the world. And so I present the following essay simply because it is the duty of having attained such knowledge, regardless of the consequences or enemies it may realize, and because truly no man is free unless all men are free.

Thus, no man is free unless all men have knowledge…

–=–

How to build a logical fallacy – An appeal to Holy authority,
by Sean Hannity and courtesy of Fox News.

“European mysticism was not dead at the time the United States of America was founded. The hand of the Mysteries controlled in the establishment of the new government, for the signature of the Mysteries may still be seen on the Great Seal of the United States of America. Carefully analysis of the seal discloses a mass of occult and Masonic symbols, chief among them the so-called American eagle—a bird which Benjamin Franklin declared unworthy to be chosen as the emblem of a great, powerful, and progressive people. Here again only the student of symbolism can see through the subterfuge and realize that American eagle upon the Great Seal is but a conventionalized phoenix, a fact plainly discernible from an examination of the original seal. In his sketch of the “History of the Seal of the United States,” Gaillard Hunt unwittingly brings forward much material to substantiate the belief that the original seal carried the phoenix bird on its obverse surface. . .”

“Not only were many of the founders of the United States Government Masons, but they received aid from a secret and august body existing in Europe, which helped them to establish this country for a peculiar and particular purpose known only to the initiated and for the most part unknown–and the unfinished pyramid upon its reverse side is a trestle-board setting forth symbolically the task to the accomplishments of which the United States Government was dedicated from the day of its inception.”

–Manly P. Hall; “The Secret Teachings of All Ages” pages xc and xci

“The Great Seal”

The Eye of Providence was a well-known classical
symbol of the deity since at least the Renaissance.

–=–

Original 1782 description for the Great Seal of the United States of America

–=–

E-Pluribus Unum = “Out of Many, One.”

Annuit Conceptis = “Announcing the Birth (of)”

Novus Ordo Seclorum = “New Order (Cycle) of the Ages”

–=–

Franklin’s early design on a 1776 currency note
“We Are One – American Congress”

–=–

Note that the City of Philadelphia was given the Masonic nick-name:

“The City of Brotherly Love”

–=–

–=–

I realize now that citizenship to the United States (a series of corporate buildings in Washington D.C. fashioned in Roman architecture and Egyptian symbols) is wholly un-American. To the average United States citizen, this statement would generally be considered offensive – and even thought to be something akin to sacrilege. Of course, this is but a surface reaction by those with patriotism but without knowledge of what they are irrationally defending, as would be expected by any member of a cult. Ironically, this word is in fact a religious term; a fallacy in its appeal to god-like authority – often used by various religions and cults when their irrational authority, holiness, or doctrines are challenged by factual evidence. For to challenge government or church authority is literally to challenge God!

But if these terms are religious in nature, why are the legal dictionaries throughout U.S. history littered with them as valid and modern legal terminology?

Of course, the most historically accurate and most obvious answer to this question is that throughout history, ALL governments have been derived via similar ceremonies and coronations of the national Church and religion, where the sovereign king, queen, dictator, or ruler claims authority not only by God, but through Him, and is generally appointed by blood relation to previous kings and by sacred anointment as the head of the church and country.

As it was, so it is today…

But then came along little old America, completely funded by the Masonic Monarchs of France and Great Britain (with its Virginia Corporation and East India Company). And yet we are to believe that the United States’ authority is derived by the “constitution” of a few scraggly outlaw settlers (who just happened to be wealthy slave-owning bloodline cousins of those same Plantagenet Kings as well as Freemasons), whom suddenly realized that separation of church and state was the way to go in their Order amongst the New World?

Of course this is absolutely contradictory to the fallacious notion that the United States was constituted as a “Christian” nation by Christian men. As we will read later, the founding fathers were certainly not Christian men, and instead were vehemently opposed to Christianity and the uncontrolled (ungoverned) organization of its churches – according to their own writings. This story of the United States being founded with Christian roots is just one more fallacy that must see its ruination if the good Christian and non-Christian people of America ever wish to be truly free of this Deist, Masonic world government (mind control); to stop fighting amongst themselves so as to focus on the real enemies among them and over them – as has been from the dawn of civilization.

Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856 actually defines the derivatives of this word sacrilege as a legal terminology:

SACRILEGE. The act of stealing from the temples or churches dedicated to the worship of God, articles consecrated to divine uses.

Of course, theft from the churches was theft from government, for government was ordained by the church and government headed the church in true symbiotic fashion. But what about here in the United States?

Well, let me ask you some questions…

Do you truly believe that the seven “Articles” within the constitution of the United States are sacred in their use by presidents, congressmen, and justices for the worship of the Christian God as His law?

How about the “Articles of Confederation“?

Do you really believe these sacred articles were of a Christian origin?

Gnostic answer: The craft now called Masonry predates Christianity by thousands of years.

We are certainly told over an over that these documents were divinely inspired by those cult-like citizens and constitutional attorney’s who worship the constitution as if it were the idol of the golden calf. And yet in the same sentence we may also hear again how important the separation of Church and State is to that government.

The constitution is clear:

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…” –1st Amendment

“…no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.” –Article VI

This establishment of religion clause refers to a central or federal religion such as the Church of England. Yet, as we will discuss, this concept of Qualification via religious Test and belief is the very foundation of government, despite what this constitution states for public consumption. For the oath is a sacred sacrament to “God”, and a requirement for government office.

So why is this sacred oath made by government officials directed to “God” and not to the people for whom that oath is supposed to protect if indeed there is a separation of church and State? Oh, that’s right, the Oath only pledges loyalty to the artificial government and its founding constitution, not to the actual living natural people – because government is not the people!

Consider this… In Masonry, the belief in some form of “higher power” is a virtual requirement for membership (citizenship) in Masonry, though exactly which god or form of worship one chooses is up to the initiate. Other than being a requirement to vaguely believe, is this not a perfect description of the “freedom of religion” and “separation of church and state” ideals that was the Masonic founding of America? Masonry: the pseudo-religion that stands on the back of and tolerates all others. Does anything else really explain these contradictions in the American way? And what better way to protect this Masonic Brotherhood as the rulers of government than to deny the organization of religion from government operations, while keeping the hall meetings of Masons where government is planned a secret from the people?

Interestingly, we see the sacrament of religion in the legal aspect of the political oath as well. Politicians generally swear their oath to the government upon the Holy Bible, so help them and as seen above, despite these religious freedom clauses in the constitution that would seemingly make the sole use of the Christian Bible for such oaths unlawful. In courtrooms, witnesses are also sworn in with the Bible.

The current congressional oath was enacted in 1884:

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.”

Here again we can read that the congressional oath has nothing to do with protecting or serving the people of America. In fact, it specifically states that a Congressman must protect government against the domestic citizens (the people). It is an oath to the continuity of the Masonic institution of government called the United States. And of course the option to affirm is granted. The fallacy that the constitution somehow refers to the people is egregious and a frighteningly ignorant qualification by the minds of the governed, especially when we read an oath that protects the constitution from the people!

Please also not that this pledge has very Masonic undertones, in that when a Mason take a pledge in the lodge ceremony, he does so “freely and without coercion”.

At the Executive level, we can hear our current president state his allegiance and oath to protect the corporate constitution and government, but never are the living breathing people or America ever mentioned…

And the people cheer…
Even though it is them the Constitution needs protection from.

–=–

So where did this concept of the oath come from?

Another word for oath is the religious and legal word “sacrament”.

Bouvier’s Law Dictionary of 1856 explains simply:

SACRAMENTUM. An oath; as, qui dicunt supra sacramentum suum.

At its basic root, we can see that the swearing of religeous oath allows certain legal rights as the sacra-ment of honor, title, and status. From Blacks Law 4rth Edition, we can see the true roots of the word sacra-ment:

SACRA. Lat. In Roman law. The right to participate in the sacred rites of the city.

The sacra-mentum (oath) is stated to acquire authority from “God” in the sacred rites of the city…

The word rite (Latin ritus) is defined as: A RELIGIOUS CUSTOM. Of course, governments have always held their rights under the religious dogma and customs of their perspective State churches. The Monarchy of England and the Church of England (formally the Roman Catholic Church as Rome and its Vatican) is just one example… And yet this religious “sacra” in the United States never seems to be acknowledged as such. Instead, the people still believe that their government is somehow of themselves (of the common people) and separated from the mystery religions, even as it kills, harms, imprisons, taxes, extorts, and kidnaps the common people and their children under some other authority it gains by swearing an oath to some higher power over those “people” in a religious custom.

Consent of the governed = Consent of the controlled.

Sacrament = rite of control of the “city” over the mind (of and for the people).

Imagine the hilarity government officers (Masons under sacred oath) must feel as they pretend to use the consent of the very governed (i.e. controlled) people they harm, tax, imprison, kill, and steal the property of as the excuse for its actions against those same people (citizens). And it uses the 5th Amendment of the very constitution those people have been trained to hold dear as its claim of power and authority to steal from the citizens even as the people scream that it’s unconstitutional (see “eminent domain” defined in part 2).

Blacks Law 4rth expounds upon this sacrament oath to government:

SACRAMENTUM. Lat. Roman Law – An oath, as being a very sacred thing; more particularly, the oath taken by soldiers to be true to their general and their country (to government, not its people). In one of the formal methods of beginning an action at law (legis actiones) known to the early Roman jurisprudence, the sacramentum was a sum of money deposited in court by each of the litigating parties, as a kind of wager or forfeit, to abide the result of the suit. The successful party received back his stake; the losing party forfeited his, and it was paid into the public treasury, to be expended for sacred objects, (in sacris rebus,) whence the name. At common law the Sacramentum is an oath.

Has anything really changed since the time of Roman domination (domain)? Of course not. For the Roman bloodlines still rule us today in America and throughout the world – a sacred cousinly dominion by blood claiming God-like authority granted by themselves over all common-blood people.

The forfeit of monetary sacramentum (sacred dollars as collateral) is now called “bail” (bailment) in the dishonorable de facto BAR administrative U.S. courts, similar to the ancient Roman system of sacramentum. The common law oath is just a replacement for the insurance money deposited for sacrament – for now we give our “word” as the word of God in court, following the copyrighted and sacred articles as set forth by the BAR Association and its international law society. And the fees paid for tickets and citations are placed into the public treasury’s investment funds, where they are used to buy sacred objects like stocks, bonds, real estate, foreign currencies, derivatives, and CUSIP commodities – the exaction (extortion) of monies from the common man to purchase power and wealth for government.

When we consider that the “oath” is assigned through the root word sacra as a rite or “religious custom”, we must consider that the oath is allowing one to enter government (control of people) through the rite of religious ceremony (ritual) so as to obtain the religious right to govern (control) – as in “the sacred rites of the city“. This is the way it’s been done for thousands of years.

SACRILEGIUM. Lat. In the civil law. The stealing of sacred things, or things dedicated to sacred uses; the taking of things out of a holy place. –Black’s Law 4th Edition

Is the United States dollar a sacred thing used for sacred uses? How about its banks that magically create that money through its Holy Federal Reserve via the oath (application and signature) of the common man?

If we think about this question not as satire but as a reality, we may understand why using the dollar for things that are against the law of that government (the holy place in Washington D.C.) are punishable by extreme measures like fines, confiscation, imprisonment, and even death.

–=–

“The United States Debt, foreign and domestic,
was the price of liberty.”

–Alexander Hamilton, as quoted by
government’s ‘Bureau of the Public Debt’ website

–=–

“IN GOD WE TRUST”

But what kind of trust?

–=–

Notice that these words IN GOD WE TRUST are all capitalized, hiding the knowledge of whether the word god should be capitalized or not (God vs. god), as in the Masonic “deity”.

So why does a government with a declared separation of church and state print the words IN GOD WE TRUST upon its money? And how is one to know which of the many gods of history it is referring to?

In which god do they trust?

Given the Federal Reserve’s interest charged on its dollars compared to the biblical teachings against the money-changing bankers and their system of usury and pledging, it is fairly easy to assume that the teachings of Jesus and most other religious doctrines (excepting Judaism) are not considered in this statement of “trust” of a “god”.

The questions that you may not have thought to ask are these:  How and why is the word GOD being used here on a government monetary instrument? What exactly is a legal “trust“? As a legal term on Legal Tender, is this money actually a monetary banking TRUST of GOD through some god’s sacramentum government?

This quote from the congressional record will be examined further on in this essay, but should be considered here when trying to define just what kind of trust we are talking about:

“The money will be worth 100 cents on the dollar because it is backed by the credit of the Nation. It will represent a mortgage on all the homes and other property of all the people in the Nation.” –Congressman Patman, speaking from the Congressional Record of March 9, 1933, and referring to the Act of March 9, 1933.

While many arm-chair patriots exclaim that the dollar is a worthless note printed out of thin air, we must here reconsider this idiom as fallacy – for this quote was made when the dollar was in the process of being stripped of its gold-standard backing and on its way to becoming a fiat currency, even as gold was being confiscated (stolen) by government from the supposedly “free” people. Thus, the dollar is literally backed in this god trust by the registered United States “persons” and their “property” as the surety for the value of the dollar.

Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856, expounds upon the legal word Trust:

TRUST, contracts, devises. An equitable right, title or interest in property, real or personal, distinct from its legal ownership; or it is a personal obligation for paying, delivering or performing anything, where the person (citizen) trusting has no real right or security, for by, that act he confides altogether to the faithfulness of those intrusted. This is its most general meaning, and includes deposits, bailments, and the like. In its more technical sense, it may be defined to be an obligation upon a person, arising out of a confidence reposed in him, to apply property faithfully, and according to such confidence… 6. When land is purchased by one man in the name of another, and the former pays the consideration money, the land will in general be held by the grantee in Trust for the person who so paid the consideration money… 8. When a contract is made for the sale of land, in equity the vendor is immediately deemed a trustee for the vendee of the estate; and the vendee, a trustee for the vendor of the purchase money; and by this means there is an equitable conversion of the property.

**Note that by this definition, it is the people putting all of their possessions into a “trust” to the government as an obligation or duty of citizenship. Thus, the words IN GOD WE TRUST are not simply a patriotic Christian pledge of allegiance to God on United States currency. It is literally a sacred and holy legal trust. For the dollar is “Legal Tender”, not a religious devotion. Government is the trustee of all public funds, lands, and property through Masonic Divine rite – the right to the city.

TRUSTEE, estates. A trustee is one to whom an estate has been conveyed in trust… 3. With respect to the duties of trustees, it is held, in conformity to the old law of uses, that pernancy (taking or receiving of something – as profits or rents or tithes in kind) of the profits, execution of estates, and defense of the land, are the three great properties of a trust, so that the courts of chancery will compel trustees, (1.) To permit the cestui que trust to receive the rents and profits of the land. (2.) To execute such conveyances, in accordance with the provisions of the trust, as the cestui que trust shall direct. (3.) To defend the title of the land in any court of law or equity.

The people never realize that their homes, their automobiles, their children, and any other property for which they register to government is a deranged act of conversion and conveyance of those things to government as trustee, signifying ownership by government and used by it as collateral for its currency – a legal Trust in “God’s” name.

CONVEYANCE, contracts. The transfer of the title to land by one or more persons to another or others. By the term persons is here understood not only natural persons but corporations. The instrument which conveys the property is also called a conveyance. For the several kinds of conveyances see Deed…

Of course, the conveyance or deed of property includes the artificial person attached to all citizens (14th amendment persons), of which the man, woman, or child is the “surety”.

Take the legal trust called Social Security for example. The common misconception is to apply the conversational definition to the word “security”, when in fact government only deals in legal language.

The word Security is defined as a “monetary instrument” in modern day financial and legal terms, and is traded openly on the international commodities markets as “bundled securities”. And of course the Social Security System is actually an investment “Trust Fund”.

SECURITY. That which renders a matter sure; an instrument which renders certain the performance of a contract. The term is also sometimes applied to designate a person who becomes the surety for another, or who engages himself for the performance of another’s contract. –Bouvier’s, 1856

SECURITY. Protection; assurance; indemnification. The term is usually applied to an obligation, pledge, mortgage, deposit, lien, etc., given by a debtor in order to make sure the payment or performance of his debt, by furnishing the creditor with a resource to be used in case of failure in the principal obligation. The name is also sometimes given to one who becomes surety or guarantor for another. –Black’s Law, 4rth Edition

Something very important is stated here. For the natural living, breathing people of America furnish the United States government (creditor) with themselves (their flesh and blood) as the “resource” to be used in case of failure in the principal obligation.

Just what is a “principal” obligation?

PRINCIPAL, adj. Chief; leading; most important or considerable; primary; original. Highest in rank, authority, character, importance, or degree. As to principal “Challenge,” “Contract,” “Obligation,” “Office,” and “Vein,” see those titles…

PRINCIPAL, n. The source of authority or right. A superintendent, as of a school district. The capital sum of a debt or obligation, as distinguished from interest or other additions to it. The corpus or capital of an estate in contradistinction to the income; “income” being merely the fruit of capital.

PRINCIPAL (Law of Agency)  – The employer or constitutor of an agent; the person who gives authority to an agent or attorney to do some act for him. Called also constituent or chief. One, who, being competent sui juris to do any act for his own benefit or on his own account, confides it to another person to do for him.

PRINCIPAL (Law of Guaranty and Suretyship) – The person primarily liable, for whose performance of his obligation the guarantor or surety has become bound.

It is very difficult to explain the dualistic nature of just what being a citizen means. For citizenship is nothing but a series of legal contracts with the United States government and representing “residence” in its jurisdiction, signed (or unsigned) by a real, living man or woman in America (the land mass including the 50 states united). This is often called a “Stawman”, though a more apt description would be a “Paperman”. The living man becomes the surety of this paper alter ego – the corporation called the artificial person (citizen). Thus, the Social Security system is nothing more than a contractual statement of debt and obligation of men as citizens to government (creditor); a pledge; a mortgage and lien against the man with the requirement to deposit funds into that GOD-TRUST as surety (debtor) for the citizen Paperman.

The word social simply refers to all individual citizens as one body of indebted (constituted) artificial persons in obligation to the creditor (government). Each man in society (under government) is obligated to pay his principal share or offer himself (the real man) as the resource to pay the debt as surety.

E-Pluribus Unum…

Out of Many, One…

Understanding the nature of this literal “Number of the Beast” of Social Security as a Mark of indentured servitude to the world government is vitally important. For this number is your bar code – your registration number as a commodity backing the U.S. dollar. Shedding it is the only way to satisfy the obligation of performance as the surety to the Paperman. For severing the number from the living man leaves no obligation (duty) of surety (responsibility) to the state of indebtedness to the “public debt” assigned to the entire S.S. numbered citizenry.

There are some who claim that by individuals becoming each a Corporation Sole, this whole statutory game of surety and debt, including the Social Security obligations, would be nullified under the common law only device of Corporation Sole. To this I have not done due diligence in research, and so I will only state it hear for your benefit in your own journey.

But how do you convince a bunch of slaves that they are better off without the benefits provided by government – that the only road to salvation and to a state of being free men is to abandon and say no to Federal government granted benefits?

Here lies the greatest and most deceitful dilemma of all… for the Social Security slaves believe they are already free despite their contractual nature and financial obligations of indebtedness with government.

Debt = Slavery

Please link to my previous research, which shows that the Social Security System was created in the League of Nations, almost a decade before being implemented in the United States, and that today this Social Security System is being managed in the United Nations under the World Bank, organized under the “International Social Security Administration”. Social Security is now in over 130 countries across the world, including all 1st world nations.

Link–> https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2012/04/24/social-security-the-international-mark-of-the-beast/

Also, please read more about the court’s opinion of who owns your children (for they carry the Number of govern-ment) here:

Link–>https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2011/12/16/do-you-own-your-children/)

I’ll list here just a few of the court’s opinions as authorities under some “god” who claim ownership of your children as registered artificial persons (citizens) and as conveyed contractual property for those with residence in the United States (citizenship in Washington D.C.):

“Marriage is a civil contract to which there are three parties – the husband, the wife and the state.” –Appellate Court of Illinois, NO. 5-97-0108

“The primary control and custody of infants is with the government.” –Tillman V. Roberts. 108 So. 62

“The court stands in the position of parens patria[e] of children.“ –Ayers v. Kelley, 284 Ala. 321, 224 So.2d 673 (1969)․

“”Parens patriae,” literally “parent of the country,” refers traditionally to role of state as sovereign and guardian of persons under legal disability.” –Ex parte Bayliss, 550 So.2d 986, 988 n. 1 (Ala.1989) (quoting Black’s Law Dictionary 1003 (5th ed.1979)).

“The state has a wide range of power for limiting parental freedom and authority in things affecting the child’s welfare… In fact, the entire familial relationship involves the State.” –Prince, 321 U.S. at 167, 64 S.Ct. at 442, 88 L.Ed. 645.

“In other words, the state is the father and mother of the child and the natural parents are not entitled to custody, except upon the state’s beneficent recognition that natural parents presumably will be the best of its citizens to delegate its custodial powers… ‘The law devolves the custody of infant children upon their parents, not so much upon the ground of natural right in the latter, as because the interests of the children, and the good of the public, will, as a general rule, be thereby promoted.’ ” –Chandler v. Whatley, 238 Ala. 206, 208, 189 So. 751, 753 (1939) (quoting Striplin v. Ware, 36 Ala. at 89) (‘ ’).

Now consider this universal legal code of “residence”. The California Government Code in Section 243 simply states:

“243. Every person has, in law, a residence.”

Thus, this maxim of legalized slavery tells you that by declaring residence as a 14th amendment citizen of the United States, you are a registered slave of that entity. While you have domicile (live in property) in the State of California, you are a fictional “resident” of Washington D.C. and thus subject to its laws as surety.

How many times a day are we told that we are “subject” to the Federal laws of the Untied States?

SUBJECT, contracts. The thing which is the object of an agreement. This term is used in the laws of Scotland.

SUBJECT, persons, government. An individual member of a nation, who is subject to the laws; this term is used in contradistiction to citizen, which is applied to the same individual when considering his political rights. 2. In monarchical governments, by subject is meant one who owes permanent allegiance to the monarch. Vide Body politic…

SUBJECTION. The obligation of one or more persons to act at the discretion, or according to the judgment and will of others. 2. Subjection is either private or public. By the former is meant the subjection to the authority of private persons; as, of children to their parents, of apprentices to their masters, and the like. By the latter (public) is understood the subjection to the authority of public persons.

SUBMISSION. A yielding to authority. A citizen is bound to submit to the laws; a child to his parents; a servant to his master. A victor may enforce, the submission of his enemy. 2. When a captor has taken a prize, and the vanquished have submitted to his authority, the property, as between the belligerents, has been transferred. When there is complete possession on one side, and submission upon the other, the capture is complete.

SUBMISSION, contracts. An agreement by which persons who have a law-suit or difference with one another, name arbitrators to decide the matter, and bind themselves reciprocally to perform what shall be arbitrated.

As a citizen in contract and residence within the United States, you own nothing, for a citizen is an artificial, legal, corporate thing. You are a surety under submission as a subject of that corporation through tacit agreement and presumed consent, and you are required to sumbit to what government arbitrates and calls statutory and prima fascie law.

SURETY, contracts. A person who binds himself for the payment of a sum of money or for the performance of something else, for another, who is already bound for the same. A surety differs from a guarantor, and the latter cannot be sued until after a suit against the principal. 2. The surety differs from bail in this, that the latter actually has, or is by law presumed to have, the custody of his principal, while the former (surety) has no control over him. The bail may surrender his principal in discharge of his obligation; the surety cannot be discharged by such surrender.

Your artificial person called a “citizen” is bound to the “public debt”.

And you are bound to that artificial person as a surety that the artificial person will pay the debt.

PLEDGE. In the law of bailment. A bailment of goods to a creditor as security for some debt or engagement. A bailment or delivery of goods by a debtor to his creditor, to be kept till the debt be discharged… The necessary elements to constitute a contract one of “pledge” are: Possession of the pledged property must pass from the pledgor to the pledgee; the legal title to the property must remain in the pledgor; and the pledgee must have a lien on the property for the payment of a debt or the performance of an obligation due him by the pledgor or some other person-while, in a “chattel mortgage,” the legal title passes to the mortgagee subject to a defeasance… A bailment of personal property as security for a debt or other obligation.–Black’s 4rth

PLEDGEE. The party to whom goods are pledged, or delivered in pledge.

PLEDGERY. Suretyship, or an undertaking or answering for another.

Social Security… or Social Pledge?

A Pledge of Allegiance… or a Pledge to be a subject to debt in submission as surety?

Why can government take your property and allow banks to do the same through the judicial decisions it makes enforced by the county Sheriff? Why its because your so-called “personal property” is a security for the debt and obligation of your strawman.

In order to bind a man to another without him or her knowing, government creates an artificial person (incorporation) without ever fully disclosing that dualistic Strawman (paperman) contractual identity to the man. And yet identity theft is rampant, where the identity of the artificial person is stolen and used by someone else in fraud, often without even the slightest knowledge of the living man that is its surety. And this specifically shows the difference between the real man and the artificial person – for the person can be taken away from the man. Citizenship can be revoked, and yet the man lives on… Identity theft is a federal crime because that artificial person and its Social Security number is the official property of the government, who contracts with the man and allows the man to use the property (person).

You are just a user of government property, including your name and number. For the name you use is government-owned through trust and domain. You are bound to perform on behalf of your corporate name as surety. And a man cannot have residence, only a 14th amendment citizen can, for the citizen is a contractual artificial person owned by government and leased to you. As soon as you are born and entered into contract (birth certificate and social) and according to Bouvier’s 1856, you might simply call yourself a citizen slave…

SLAVE. A man who is by law deprived of his liberty for life, and becomes the property of another. 2. A slave has no political rights, and generally has no civil rights. He can enter into no contract unless specially authorized by law; what he acquires generally, belongs to his master. The children of female slaves follow the condition of their mothers, and are themselves slaves. –Bouvier’s Law, 1856

This definition explains the average citizen’s disposition all too well:

(1) The 5th amendment allows government to deprive its citizens of life, liberty, and property with due process of its own law by the very courts who claim to own your children as property of the State above.

(2) Citizens have given up natural rights for contractual political/civil rights from government – in other words they accept in contractual servitude whatever rights their government grants them as slave/citizens. Note that civil rights are in no way whatsoever natural rights under God, but are a government granted status and privilege.

(3) The citizen can only enter into contracts allowed and authorized by government (law). If he incorporates, his corporation is a government corporation requiring his master’s (government’s) permission and license to do business and make contracts with other government corporations and persons. Without a license, a subjected citizen can do no business in the jurisdiction (residence) of the United States corporation.

(4) The Citizen’s “property” belongs to his master or “sovereign” – the government – through contractual citizenship and as collateral for the general currency, which he may utilize for user-only purposes as legal tender.

More on this later…

In other words, government is claiming to be a Holy church or temple; believing that it can somehow have god-like authority over all things through the use of its holy works, things, and articles (such as constitutions and contracts). It even accepts an oath to God as acceptance into its Order of the temple, as if God (or some god) granted it His authority Himself.

The fallacy of Americans is that this has happened over time, and that the original constitution was in fact somehow immune to all of this mental and contractual enslavement that we have today. And yet at the same time, even while we are all enslaved, Americans still want to protect the constitution – the very foundation of the government that enslaves them through debt and obligation. This oxymoron creates the irrational use of words like traitor and sacrilege…

SACRILEGE. In English criminal law. Larceny from a church. The crime of breaking a church or chapel, and stealing therein. In old English law. The desecration of anything considered holy; the alienation to laymen or to profane or common purposes of what was given to religious persons and to pious uses.

Remember, there was no separation of church and State in English law, thus the words laymen and religious persons both refer to politicians of the church and State.

SACRILEGUS. Lat. In the civil and common law. A sacrilegious person; one guilty of sacrilege.

–=–

“Receive my instruction, and not silver;
and knowledge rather than choice gold.”

“For wisdom is better than rubies; and all the things
that may be desired are not to be compared to it.”

—Proverbs 8:10-11 (KJB)

–=–

Ironically, the acceptance of the United States Dollar by Americans is akin to accepting silver, gold, and rubies in lieu of the knowledge and the wisdom that would otherwise set a people free from this theocracy’s debt induced contractual slavery of all its citizens. For the dollar is the root of the evils of monetary debt enslavement – a trust formed by evil money-changing men and certainly not by God or approved within the Bible.

And so I say unto the people of America, do you believe it to be sacrilege when I say what I have said? For if you do, then you must believe that I have stolen from or blasphemed your government as if it were a religion, church, or temple – as is the legal definition of the word sacrilege.

Do you believe that your government is your church? Your temple? Is it truly of God or just pretending? Can you really believe that everything it does is for the greater good as commissioned by That divine entity through its constitution, and that its sacred opinions and legal articles should not be questioned – just like any other religious institution and its dogma? And is this not the same belief of a typical member of a cult for its leaders – its leaders being the governing body of the cult (religion)?

Do you believe me to be guilty of sacrilege by defaming these corrupt but sacramental oath-taking politicians, their flag, and their corporation they call a country? If so, do you then somehow believe them Holy and thus justified in their completely corrupt actions? For you must be of the religion of the “Cult of the Constitution” to believe that I have just committed such an unholy alienation of your laymen as political figures; religious persons that even as you read this piously use their own statutory, sacred articles of law to corrupt everything you see for personal and empire profit and gain at your expense.

Are you brave and strong enough in your faithful resolve that the United States is a Christian nation that you may further challenge your belief by continuing with me on this journey? For if indeed it is not a Christian nation or not founded as such, should not God wish you to learn how to make it so – a nation bound only by the natural law of God and not the extraneous statutory legal atrocities of man against nature and God?

To be clear… I absolutely do desecrate, turn my back on, and do not consent to, accept, or acknowledge the legitimacy of this supposedly sacred temple of the Untied States and its Holy stranglehold over America and its people. And I invite you to keep reading to find out the whole truth… for any doubts or questions you might have thus far will likely be answered herein…

–=–
The Power Of God?
–=–

When we stop and consider for just a moment, we realize that all governments of the past and present derive their power from some form of sacramentum – an oath under the supervision of some form of god or deity – and that the legal language and authority claimed has always been ecclesiastical in nature; ritually derived from a higher power. For if its power were truly derived from the common people it governs (controls), it would have no power over the common people at all – for the people could then just voluntarily say no to government any time they disagree with it. No police officer could crush their heads in without asking permission first.

Does this really sound logical or reasonable to you?

When we think of this “of, by, and for the people” propaganda, we realize that the whole concept is indeed ridiculous. For it would literally mean that the people are governing themselves, and that no edict, declaration, or law from government would ever have any authority over any of the individual people if they did not personally agree with it…

Perhaps if the people were each an individual Corporation Sole things might be different.

That is, unless the sacramentum is taken into consideration, where allegiance is not just ceremonial, but ecclesiastically binding upon a people who never even realize the nature of their pledge. For the ancient form of pledging has always been an integral part of the religious customs of corrupt governments acting as if they were God’s chosen incorporation on Earth.

ECCLESIASTICAL. Belonging to, or set apart for the church; as, distinguished from civil or secular. Vide Church.

ECCLESIASTICS, canon law. Those persons who compose the hierarchical state of the church. They are regular and secular.

ECCLESIASTIC. A clergyman; one destined to the divine ministry, as, a bishop, a priest, a deacon.

ECCLESIASTICAL LAW. By this phrase it is intended to include all those rules which govern ecclesiastical tribunals. Vide Law Canon.

ECCLESIASTICAL COURTS. English law. Courts (tribunals) held by the king’s authority as supreme governor of the church, for matters which chiefly concern religion…

When considering the Cannon law – Greek: kanon / κανών, Arabic: Qanon / قانون, Hebrew: kaneh / קנה, we must realize the Masonic origins of the Roman Catholic Church. Unfortunately, we must also understand that “Church’s” crusade against Christianity across the nations. For the ancient understanding of this word “Cannon” stems from the tools of that deistic Order of Masons, and is defined as “straight”; a rule, code, standard, or measure. The root meaning in each of these languages is the word “reed”, or the Romantic era English word for “cane”, another sacred symbol in Freemasonry.

As required viewing and for a more deep comprehension of the root nature of the Catholic Church and its true intent, please take the time to view this lecture. Understanding the symbols of Islam and Catholicism as one in the same religion and that both are opposed to true Christianity is of vital importance to comprehending the goal of world religions and Masonry, seeking to divide, conquer, then unify all men into one world religion.

Pardon the religious (Christian) overtones in the very beginning credits,
for the information presented thereafter is vital to our understanding.

It is hard to imagine that the Catholic Church (Jesuits)
created Islam to rid Europe, Africa, and the land in the Middle East
of un-governed Christianity and to control all occultism.

At around the 43 minute mark in this video, Walter tells you
of the setting up of World War 3 as a religious war between religions.
This is a preplanned war pitting Islam against Judea-Christianity (Zionism).
To this I attest and will ultimately show this reality is happening even as you read…

–=–

As referred to in this video lecture above, we see another example of the true nature of just what a constitution is and where in fact its origins lay. The following is literally a constitution to change and alter the laws (cannons) of the Roman Church with regards to the worship of Mary, altering the original Apostolic Constitutions from the Popes (government) in the 1400’s-1500’s.

In other words, this is an “amendment” to the “Constitution“.

–=–

The Immaculate Conception

“Ineffabilis Deus”

“Apostolic Constitution issued by Pope Pius IX on December 8, 1854.”

“Papal Sanctions”

“…So at the instance and request of the bishops mentioned above, with the chapters of the churches, and of King Philip and his kingdoms, we renew the Constitutions and Decrees issued by the Roman Pontiffs, our predecessors, especially Sixtus IV, Paul V, and Gregory XV, in favor of the doctrine asserting that the soul of the Blessed Virgin, in its creation and infusion into the body, was endowed with the grace of the Holy Spirit and preserved from original sin; and also in favor of the feast and veneration of the conception of the Virgin Mother of God, which, as is manifest, was instituted in keeping with that pious belief. So we command this feast to be observed under the censures and penalties contained in the same Constitutions.

Translation: Mary is God, and we’ll punish or kill you if you don’t agree.

“And therefore, against all and everyone of those who shall continue to construe the said Constitutions and Decrees in a manner apt to frustrate the favor which is thereby given to the said doctrine, and to the feast and relative veneration, or who shall dare to call into question the said sentence, feast and worship, or in any way whatever, directly or indirectly, shall declare themselves opposed to it under any pretext whatsoever, were it but only to the extent of examining the possibilities of effecting the definition, or who shall comment upon and interpret the Sacred Scripture, or the Fathers or Doctors in connection therewith, or finally, for any reason, or on any occasion, shall dare, either in writing or verbally, to speak, preach, treat, dispute or determine upon, or assert whatsoever against the foregoing matters, or who shall adduce any arguments against them, while leaving them unresolved, or who shall disagree therewith in any other conceivable manner, we hereby declare that in addition to the penalties and censures contained in the Constitutions issued by Sixtus IV to which we want them to be subjected and to which we subject them by the present Constitution, we hereby decree that they be deprived of the authority of preaching, reading in public, that is to say teaching and interpreting; and that they be also deprived ipso facto of the power of voting, either actively or passively, in all elections, without the need for any further declaration; and that also, ipso facto, without any further declaration, they shall incur the penalty of perpetual disability from preaching, reading in public, teaching and interpreting, and that it shall not be possible to absolve them from such penalty, or remove it, save through ourselves, or the Roman Pontiffs who shall succeed us.

“We also require that the same shall remain subject to any other penalties which by us, of our own free will — or by the Roman Pontiffs, our successors (according as they may decree) — shall be deemed advisable to establish, and by the present Constitution we declare them subject thereto, and hereby renew the above Decrees and Constitutions of Paul V and Gregory XV.”

–=–

Does this sound familiar?

…Believe in the validity of the U.S. Constitution without question or be ostracized and called or tried as treasonous.

The constitution, I hope it’s now plain to see, is not just the foundation of government but the foundation of all religions and cults that claim to be government.

Perhaps none in the church dare call it treason as opposed to sacrilege. But in this church and in the United States government, treason is exactly what is “unconstitutional”. For treason is to question the authority of the constitution, and the constitution is heaven sent.

Of course after the American Civil War, the treasonous (yet lawfully elected by the people) politicians of the Southern confederate states were banned from participating in the new holy government of the new United States and its new constitution with a replaced 13th amendment, and were subsequently replaced themselves by military officials of the Northern union. Never mind that the abandonment of congress by those states officially ended the Federal Government’s legitimacy stare decises.

ABANDON. To desert, surrender, forsake, or cede. To relinquish or give up with intent of never again resuming one’s right or interest. To give up or to cease to use. To give up absolutely; to forsake entirely; to renounce utterly; to relinquish all connection with or concern in; to desert. It includes the intention, and also the external act by which it is carried into effect. –Black’s 4rth Edition

The point here is that the idea of a constitution was nothing novel or new in America, and that the practice of constituting is much more ancient and Mysterious than the colonization of America, let alone the constitution of it into a debt compacted corporation. For the use of constitutions is and always has been a religious and secret societal ritual and custom, complete with sacrament oaths and holy incorporation. And to speak against such constitutions, as we read above, has always been tantamount to treason and sacrilege against God Himself.

And Holy Crusades and Holy “Civil Wars” (wars to force the civil law) follow constitutional history in all accounts.

Welcome to America…

Here is the memorial to the celebrated “Grand Army of the Republic”:

Why is it in the shape of a phallus (obelisk)?
More on this below…

Recognize the inverted 5-pointed star (pentagram)?
The eagle (phoenix) rising over the Masonic arch,
symbolized by cannons – rising out of destruction and
clasped to the corporate flag of the United States?

The inverse side of the metal.
Surprise, surprise… the crescent and the star, the five and six-pointed star, etc…

–=–

The Grand Army of the Republic was founded on April 6, 1866, on the principles of Masonic “Fraternity, Charity and Loyalty,” in Decatur Illinois, by Benjamin F. Stephenson. It grew into a de facto (illegitimate) political arm of the Republican Party during the Reconstruction Era with over 400,000 members. The 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments are considered “reconstruction amendments”.

Ironically, a republic with an “standing” army is against the nature of a republic, especially one who conquers nations like the confederacy to force them to be under the constitution of the United States. The fallacy that the United States is an actual “republic” (a word not mentioned in the constitution) will be covered in a later section.

–=–

It is the very ritualistic nature of these mega-church-and-state religions/governments like Catholicism that should give us the first clue that something is most certainly wrong with their claims of following Christ’s teachings. For ritual and ceremony take us away from our appreciation of God as nature and its laws, making us subjects of the man-made laws (Canons) of the government of the Church.

Ancient of Days by William Blake, 1794

(Sun) God with his Masonic Compass at His creation of Earth…

–=–

“…when he set a compass upon the face of the depth (earth).”

—Proverbs 8:27, (Christian and Hebrew Bibles)

–=–

 “Elaborate ritual and ceremony, which theoretically are designed to aid the worshiper,
usually have the opposite effect in that they tend to take the mind away from things
which are spiritual and eternal and to center it on that which is material and temporal.
Artistic ritual… often become ends in themselves, and can easily become instruments
which prevent the people from joining in the worship of God…”

–Lorraine Boettner, ‘Roman Catholicism’ (p. 273)

–=–

“Ritualism is the highway to Rome.”

–J.C. Ryle, ‘What do we owe to the Reformation?’  

–=–

“The Blue Lodge Mason is taught that the “G” in the basic Masonic symbol
represents God. Later on, he is told that it represents “deity”.
Later still, he is told that it represents “geometry”.
In reality, this letter represents the “generative principle,” the Sun-god
and, thus,the worshiped phallus, the male “generative principle…”

“In its position (along with the square and compass) on the east wall over
the chair (throne) of the Worshipful Master, it is the representation of the Sun,
|thus of the Sun-god, Osiris. Its earthly meaning, then, is of the sacred phallus;
its cosmic meaning is of the Sun, worshiped since antiquity
by pagans while facing the East.”

Ex-33 degree Mason Jim Shaw, ‘The Deadly Deception’

–=–

“The Bible is an indispensable part of the furniture of a Christian (Masonic) Lodge, because it is the sacred book of the Christian religion. The Hebrew Pentateuch in a Hebrew Lodge, and a Koran in a Mohammedan one, belong on the Alter; and one of these and a Square and Compass, properly understood, are the Great Lights by which a Mason must walk and work.”

–Albert Pike, ‘Morals and Dogma’, Page 11.

–=–

And those Deists who swear an oath (sacramentum) falsely on the Bible but swear to some other deity or god are not at all concerned about shaming the One in that Holy book. For the ceremony of sacramentum is not a Christian tenet, but the ritual of those who are anti-Christian. Masonic ritual is indeed admitted to be against the Bible and its story of Christ, as we will learn.

–=–

“The Holy Book must be opened upon the altar before a Masonic Lodge may be opened.  Freemasonry is not concerned with doctrine or dogma or sect or denomination, but only with “that natural religion in which all men agree.”  Therefore, the Holy Book is called the V.S.L. or Volume of Sacred Law or the Book of the Law.  If the members of a Lodge are Christian, Moslem, Jewish or Buddhist, the V.S.L. of their particular belief is opened upon their altar.  The V.S.L. is, therefore, a symbol of the revealed will and teachings of the Great Architect of the Universe – a name under which any Freemason can worship that Deity in Whom he puts his faith and trust… Masonic dates are written “A.L.” for “Anno Lucis” or “In the year of Light” which is 4000 years plus the current year. i.e. the year 2001 written Masonically would be 6001.  This is because the practice has followed the ancient belief that the world was created when God said “Let there be light”, 4000 years before Christ.“

—‘One Hundred One Questions about Freemasonry’ Masonic Service Association, 1955.

–=–

And what great teachings were stated about and within the art of Masonry BEFORE CHRIST (B.C.) – to be done within the society to fellow masters of the craft without applying to or protecting the goyim and common man?

–=–

“A man should abstain from doing unto others what he would
not they should do unto him; and this is called the principle of acting on the square.”

–‘Great Learning’, 500 B.C.

–=–

“A master Mason, in teaching his apprentices, makes use of
the compasses and the square. Ye who are engaged in the pursuit of Wisdom,
must also make use of the compasses and the square.”

–Mencius, in China, around 300 B.C. 

–=–
The Canon Is Loaded
–=–

We can see the law of Canons throughout all major religions, all incorporating their political governments under these laws through their sacrament constitutions. These contractual constitutions, even as they pretend to be opposed to one another, all pledge allegiance to the same corporation of Church and State, not to God or the people.

The most common misconception with the people of America is that the constitution of the United States gives individual rights to man. But the constitution only gives the government rights and then limits those rights, for the constitution was not voted on by and was not ever for the common people. Again, people came before the constitution, and derive the natural rights from God/nature. No man derives a right from any paper that is not issued and granted by permissive acceptance through contract by government. Thus, the people consent to the unnatural political rights provided and granted by the government, while government takes its political right to assign those rights from its founding constitution and the legislation it passes.

Again, a constitution only gives rights to an incorporated body politic, not to natural men. A natural man cannot use political rights any more than his corporate artificial person can claim natural rights.

But the constitution does allow for government to bestow and revoke privileges and benefits to those people who take its mark (number) through the statutory legislative process.

When in history a country and its government (a political corporation) was newly created, expanding the land and empire of the international theocratic society of bloodline kings who funded those new government ventures, they were all started by constituting a compact of debt of allegiance to that Monarchy, which was called a “constitution”. In the United States, the people were taxed and indentured from their labors and estates, because those estates were of England and its Divine Rite through subjection. Thus, the men who came to America always claimed their rights as Englishmen under the Crown of England and not at all independent from that kingdom and its rule, which of course acted with God’s authority (permission).

As it turns out, everything that our “Founding Fathers” did in their Declaration of Independence was specifically to preserve their “natural-born rights as Englishmen“, which was in fact a perfectly legal pursuit as a crown colony.

We must discover what this dualistic word independence actually means:

INDEPENDENCE. A state of perfect irresponsibility to any superior; the United States are free and independent of all earthly power. 2. Independence may be divided into political and natural independence. By the former (political independence) is to be understood that we have contracted no tie except those which flow from the three great natural rights of safety, liberty and property. The latter (natural independence) consists in the power of being able to enjoy a permanent well-being, whatever may be the disposition of those from whom we call ourselves independent. In that sense a nation may be independent with regard to most people, but not independent of the whole world. —Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856

But let’s not forget… England was not just an “Earthly Power”, for it was ordained by the authority of God. Thus a natural independence literally could not exist at that time, as the King was God incarnate, and God was nature.

It is also important to point out the following, which lead to many other such constitutions in the colonies:

The word charter, as in the “Charter of Connecticut”, was just the next constitution. It was an amended version of the first. And of course the Articles of Confederation were the constitution until the U.S. constitution replaced it. So to claim that the 1789 constitution was original or unique is patently false. It simply set up and chartered “govern-ment” control of the people. And it was again replaced after the civil war, though made to look the same, to attempt to legitimize a replacement de facto government under military rule..

What did Thomas Jefferson have to say about the Declaration of Independence? Only that…

“…an appeal to the tribunal of the world was deemed proper for our justification. This was the object of the Declaration of Independence. Not to find out new principles, or new arguments, never before thought of, not merely to say things which had never been said before; but to place before mankind the common sense of the subject, in terms so plain and firm as to command their assent, and to justify ourselves in the independent stand we are compelled to take. Neither aiming at originality of principle or sentiment, nor yet copied from any particular and previous writing, it was intended to be an expression of the American mind, and to give to that expression the proper tone and spirit called for by the occasion. All its authority rests then on the harmonizing sentiments of the day, whether expressed in conversation, in letters, printed essays, or in the elementary books of public right, as Aristotle, Cicero, Locke, Sidney, &c..” –Thomas Jefferson, in a letter to Henry Lee on May 8, 1825

And of course as a mere “declaration”, this document had absolutely no legal authority. It was just a poetic “justification” for the creation of a debt compact for a central government called the U.S. constitution. It might as well have simply been an op-ed in the local newspaper, but is instead cherished as God-sent. And yet the tenets of the constitution, in case you haven’t noticed, are inherently opposed to the ones in the Declaration. The declaration talks about natural rights whereas the constitution sets up political ones, and political rights are always unnecessary unless their goal is to trample upon natural rights. And this “trick” of using some cause to justify tyrannies and more government has been used by that “constituted” government ever since.

As for just what is political independence, this is more difficult to grasp.

In the United States, for instance, our government has created many independent agencies of government. The Post Office, the Social Security Department, the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Federal Reserve System are all independent agencies of government. Remember that the word of means belonging to. These are all political agencies of government, given the power by congress to make rules and act independently of day to day oversight of that congress. But in no way are they not agencies of government. They are politically independent but certainly not naturally so. And just like Congress, the King of England and the Crown’s world empire at the time simply did not have time or ability to govern America from his throne in England. Thus each nation within the kingdom was allowed to partially govern itself (to make its own rules) while still being subjected to the laws and tithing (debt) of the Crown Temple of England.

In this way, the corporation of the United States was and is politically independent, while still run (governed) by the blood relations and great grandsons of that same King listed in the Declaration of Independence.

Do you really believe you have a “choice” in these United States family elections?

–=–

“The presidential candidate with the most royal genes and
chromosomes has, up to now, always won the White House…”

–Burke’s Peerage researchers

–=–

“[Bush] is closely related to every European Monarch
both on and off the throne… Not one member of his family was
working class, middle class, or even middle, middle class…”

–Harold Brooks-Baker, Burke’s Peerage publishing director–

http://abcnews.go.com/International/story?id=82279&page=1

–=–

“Believe it or not, Mitt Romney and George W. Bush
are cousins — 10th cousins, twice removed, that is.”

“Romney is actually related to six past presidents —
more than any other 2012 GOP contestant. Franklin D. Roosevelt
is his eighth cousin, twice removed, and both Calvin Coolidge and
Herbert Hoover are his 10th cousins. Then there is his
sixth cousin (four times removed) Franklin Pierce,
and both 10th cousins Bush I and II.
Three out of these six were even (gasp!) Democrats.”

–Time Magazine–

–=–

“Obama and Palin are 10th cousins through a common ancestor
named John Smith… As for [Rush] Limbaugh, he’s also a
10th cousin of the president – one time removed…”

“President George W. Bush? He’s related to both Obama and Palin,
the site found. Obama and Bush are 11th cousins through
common ancestor Samuel Hinckley, and Bush and Palin are
10th cousins one time removed, also through Hinckley –
who, and stay with us now, was John Smith’s father-in-law.”

“Obama is related to investor Warren Buffett and actor Brad Pitt.”

“Palin, the former Alaska governor and Republican
vice presidential candidate, is a distant cousin of
both Franklin D. Roosevelt and Princess Diana.”

“In 2007, Cheney’s wife, Lynne, discovered ancestral ties between
former Vice President Dick Cheney and Obama while researching
her book. She said the relationship was eighth cousin…”

“Palin is distant cousins with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid
and conservative author and pundit Ann Coulter…”

–Ancestry.com, via Anastasia Tyler–

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/obama-distant-cousins-palin-limbaugh-bush

–≈–

“[Bush’s] royal kin include Britain’s Queen Elizabeth II, the Queen Mother,
Duchess Sarah “Fergy” Ferguson and even the late Princess Diana.
His most prominent ancestor may be England’s King Charles II”

“Bill Clinton and Bob Dole have more in common than
wanting to be president. They are distant cousins!
However, Clinton has bluer blood, giving him an election edge”

“Bill Clinton was born William Jefferson Blythe, but took his
stepfather’s name as a teenager. Clinton’s ancestry can be traced back,
on his mother’s side, to King Henry III who ruled England
from 1227 to 1272. He is descended from King Robert I of France.
Furthermore, he is related to every Scottish monarch to the
current British royal family… Clinton is related to
every ancient aristocratic family in Britain today.”

“As for John Kerry, “the 60-year-old can trace his roots back
to the first Massachusetts governor, John Winthrop,
to every great family in Boston and to a host of royals in Europe.
Kerry can almost certainly be traced back to King James I
and to the bloodlines straight through the Windsor and
Hanover families,” Brooks-Baker said. “ But both candidates
have a remarkable number of royal connections
and both are related to Queen Elizabeth.”

http://thecounterpunch.hubpages.com/hub/Nearly-all-US-Presidents-are-descendant-from-the-British-and-French-Royal-Families

–=–

Anyone reading this who claims the fact that all presidents of the United States are direct descendants of the Plantagenet kings of England, including Obama, is just a coincidence or some silly degree of separation, then you may as well stop reading and go back to the enter-tain-ment that govern-ment provides as a service to its subjects right now.

But why were the bloodline colonists of America even to this day so interested in retaining their English-born rights ordained by the Church (Canons) to rule the common man?

Because that’s where their inherent and inseparable divine right and rite to rule under God comes from!

Samuel Adams wrote in 1772:

“All persons born in the British American Colonies are, by the laws of God and nature and by the common law of England, exclusive (subjects) of all charters from the Crown, well entitled, and by acts of the British Parliament are declared to be entitled, to all the natural, essential, inherent, and inseparable rights, liberties, and privileges of subjects born in Great Britain or within the realm. – The Rights of the Colonists: The Report of the Committee of Correspondence to the Boston Town Meeting, Nov. 20, 1772.

Resolution #2 of the Declaration of Rights of the Stamp Act Congress on October 19, 1765, was written:

“That His Majesty’s liege subjects in these colonies are entitled to all the inherent rights and privileges of his natural born subjects within the kingdom of Great Britain.“

The “Charter of Massachusetts Bay (colony)” issued by the king in 1629 proclaimed that the people of the colony:

…shall have and enjoy all liberties and Immunities of free and naturall Subjects within any of the Domynions of Us, our Heires or Successors, to all Intents, Constructions, and Purposes whatsoever, as if they and everie of them were borne within the Realme of England.

And today, Americans claim rights from a paper constitution chartered and paid for by Britain and Her subjects who rule by blood relation to that Crown Temple. And like fools we call this independence and freedom.

The colonists who came to America wanted nothing more than and in fact insisted upon being treated as natural-born Englishmen with all rights and privileges thereof and under the king but in the King’s land of America. This was reflected in every facet of the New America (New England). And it is part of the basis of the falsity of sentiment of the time in the term God-given natural rights, as the “king” was considered to be of “God” – the “divine” right of kings – under which rights were granted to the King’s (God’s) subjects.

Today, the people still believe that the constitution is divine, and that like the divine rite of kings, somehow that divine constitution gives them rights over and despite God and nature.

Perhaps it is easier to understand the sentiment of the time towards breaking away from that kingdom of Britain by the actual people of the colonies if we consider the sentiment of the people of the Untied States today being forced into the international body politic of the United Nations and excepting its own “constitution” – The International Declaration of Human Rights. This is the incremental process of constitutionalism that for centuries has conquered nations, America included. Our leaders tell us its good to be a member of the U.N. just as the same bloodline Masons and cousins of our current government told the colonists back in the late 1780’s that membership in the “United States” as a “federation” under a “constitution” was good for them. And though the people still believe that their rights are derived from the constitution that founded the United States instead of realizing they come from God (nature) and that a constitution is opposed to natural rights, they are being dragged into that United Nations as their new sovereign world government without a fight, like sheep to the slaughter. And the people of the United States of America who fight in the military are now fighting not to preserve the United States of America, but to preserve the transference of America into that international government even when it is against their best interests. For the United States military is now the “peace-keeping” military of the world, attacking all manner of nations around the world to ensure United Nations world governance friendly governments can be constituted throughout all the world’s people. This is the cause used to declare the right to constitute new govern-ments and charter new debt compacts (constitutions) all across the world. And the people, as with the colonists, blindly follow their Masonic leaders and died for their causes, most believing that their actions were ordained by God Himself. And they never comprehend that all the world is just a stage, and that these wars are all funded by the same central government that has always controlled (governed) the minds of men through ritual and ceremony.

–=–

“Every Masonic lodge is a temple of religion; and its teachings are instruction in religion… Masonry, like all religions, all the Mysteries, Hermeticism and Alchemy, conceals its secrets from all except the Adepts and Sages, or the Elect, and uses false explanations and misinterpretations of its symbols to mislead… to conceal the Truth, which it calls Light, from them, and to draw them away from it… The truth must be kept secret, and the masses need a teaching proportioned to their imperfect reason… every man’s conception of God must be proportioned to his mental cultivation, and intellectual powers, and moral excellence. God is, as man conceives him, the reflected image of man himself… The true name of Satan, the Kabalists say, is that of Yahveh reversed; for Satan is not a black god… Lucifer, the Light Bearer! Strange and mysterious name to give to the Spirit of Darkness! Lucifer, the Son of the Morning! Is it he who bears the Light… Doubt it not!”

–Albert Pike, Morals And Dogma

–=–

This process of Masonic constitutionalism that thus formed the new corporation of the United States can be seen not only in the founding of most other political governments, but also in the religions/churches that prop them up.

For instance, the Protestant Episcopal Church was incorporated into the United States in the year 1789, just months after the United States was created through its own legal constitution. Of course a constitution, as we will soon learn, is actually a pledge to another entity – in this case a pledge as a member of the See of Canterbury by this United States corporation of religion – and was a pledge of allegiance and of financial responsibility to fund and support the crown of England as head of that church.

And none dare call it treason…

The Archbishop of Canterbury is the senior primate and chief religious figure of the Church of England (where the current queen Elizabeth II is the British sovereign and Supreme governor of the church). The Archbishop chairs the General Synod, sits or chairs many of the church’s important boards and committees, and plays a central part in national ceremonies such as coronations – the anointment of Monarchs to God-like (Christos) status. As holder of one of the “five great sees” (the others being York, London, Durham, and Winchester), the Archbishop of Canterbury is ex officio (by virtue of that office) one of the Lords Spiritual of the House of Lords. He is one of the highest-ranking men in England and the highest ranking non-royal in the United Kingdom’s order of precedence. Since Henry VIII broke with Rome, the Archbishops of Canterbury have been selected by the English (British since the Act of Union in 1707) monarch. Today the choice is made in the name of the monarch by the prime minister, from a shortlist of two selected by an ad-hoc committee called the Crown Nominations Commission.

Here is the preamble of the constitution for the Episcopal Church that was formed in the United States:

–=–

Constitution & Canons
Together with the Rules of Order
For the government of the Protestant Episcopal Church
in the United States of America
Otherwise Known as
The Episcopal Church

PREAMBLE – The Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America, otherwise known as The Episcopal Church (which name is hereby recognized as also designating the Church), is a constituent member of the Anglican Communion, a Fellowship within the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church, of those duly constituted Dioceses, Provinces, and regional Churches in communion with the See of Canterbury, upholding and propagating the historic Faith and Order as set forth in the Book of Common Prayer. This Constitution, adopted in General Convention in Philadelphia in October, 1789, as amended in subsequent General Conventions, sets forth the basic Articles for the government of this Church, and of its overseas missionary jurisdictions.

–=–

Philadelphia… the “City of Brotherly Love”.

Here we see that even though the Protestent and Catholic churches are split and seemingly opposed in many respects, it was constituted in allegiance and debt with the central Church and State under the canons of ancient Masonic Roman law.

And let’s face it, the Church of England is simply the Church of Rome with divorce allowed – the purpose for thenHenry the VIII as King of England in making the illusion of division in the first place. There was no war, no fight, not even a skirmish between this separation. Not like when America declared independence form England. Go figure…

Of course Bloody Mary subsequently reinstated the Catholic Church while burning folks at the stake in its name, but then it was abolished again. What a lovely history.

The term re-in-state should be an obvious indication that the church is the state no matter what banner it flies or Bible it pretends to rule with.

The meme in America that the constitution of the United States is unique, original, special, inherent, organic, good, or even that it is the “law of the land” is a result of the lack of knowledge as to just what a constitution actually is… a compact of indebtedness and thus allegiance to another. In essence, a constitution is nothing more than the “Articles of Incorporation” or a “charter”. In fact, I’m positive that the reader has often heard the constitution referred to in America as the “Charter for Freedom”.

Now, remembering that Bouvier’s Law Dictionary of 1856 was commissioned and officially accepted by government, let’s find out what a constitution really is:

CONSTITUTION – contracts. The constitution of a contract, is the making of the contract as, the written constitution of a debt.

CONSTITUTOR – civil law. He who promised by a simple pact to pay the debt of another; and this is always a principal obligation.

CONSTITUENT – He who gives authority to another to act for him.

TO CONSTITUTE – contracts. To empower, to authorize. In the common form of letters of attorney, these words occur, “I nominate, constitute and appoint.”

CONSTITUIMUS – A Latin word which signifies we constitute. Whenever the king of England is vested with the right of creating a new office, he must use proper words to do so, for example, erigimus, constituimus…

And just what is an attorney anyway?

From Black’s Law 4rth:

ATTORN. To turn over; to transfer to another money or goods; to assign to some particular use or service. To consent to the transfer of a rent or reversion. To agree to become tenant to one as owner or landlord of an estate previously held of another, or to agree to recognize a new owner of a property or estate and promise payment of rent to him.

ATTORNARE. Latin. To attorn; to transfer or turn over; to appoint an attorney or substitute.

ATTORNATUS. One who is attorned, or put in the place of another; a substitute; hence, an attorney.

ATTORNE. Latin. French. In old English law. An attorney.

ATTORNEY. In the most general sense this term denotes an agent or substitute, or one who is appointed and authorized to act in the place or stead of another. An agent, or one acting on behalf of another. One who is put in place, stead, and turn of another to manage his matters of law. An agent employed by party to case to manage it for him.

Now do you understand? Do you see anywhere that a constitution gives the people any rights? Do you understand now that a constitution is a debt contract giving authority through attorn-ment (turning over the mind) to government to act on your behalf (power of attorney), even against your best interests?

Need more proof? Let’s take a look at the constitution…

Article 6 of the constitution states very clearly that the United States was constituted as a debtor nation:

“All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.”

There was never independence if this country was founded in Debt and Engagement to England and France.

We know what the word Debt means, but what about the word Engagements?

ENGAGEMENT. This word is frequently used in the French law to signify not only a contract, but the obligations arising from a quasi contract. The terms obligations and engagements, are said to be synonymous; but the Code seems specially to apply the term engagement to those obligations which the law, imposes on a man without the intervention of any contract, either on the part of the obligor or the obligee.

In the case of the United States, the constitution specifically notes here that the debts and obligations of contract owed to other nations at the signing of that constitution were still valid (to France and Great Britain). Ironically, the great American dream has been promoted in very much the same way, where mortgage, college, and credit debt (loan) contracts are somehow the way to be a free people.

And have you ever considered that “freedom” of religion means protection of all religions, including Lucifarian, Demonology, the Church of Satan, Atheism, and of course most importantly the Deism of Free and Accepted Masonry and other government approved secret societies and cults?

And the people have a choice:

Be debt free and free men as a non-citizens…

Or accept citizenship where debt slavery is surety to the government granted privilege of freedom.

In reality, the term Debt is freedom could not be a more true statement. For government grants freedom as a privilege to its subjects without them even knowing it is a privilege; one not being derived from a natural right. Remember the dollar and its trust of god? The word freedom is perhaps the most misused, misunderstood word in the history of all words. Freedom is actually defined as the positive (forced) right to obey the government’s sacred articles of law.

A political or positive right is the right to have something forced upon you by the lawmaker.

While a negative or natural right is the right to NOT ever have anything forced upon you.

Free = outside of man’s law, in harmony with nature under God.

Freedom = obey the law of man.

Man’s law = pay your debt, be subject, obey, or else.

This definition (freedom = obedience to government law) can be found in any legal dictionary that you might read. We will certainly define legally the word freedom later in this presentation as we walk through the many fallacies of the constitution and the United States. For being free in nature and having government-granted freedom are two completely opposite ideas; directly opposed to one another. A positive right inherently and necessarily cancels out a negative right, just as man has attempted to conquer nature itself.

Read my in depth essay on this subject, an integral understanding of the duality of what a right really is, here:

Link–> https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2013/02/19/tyranny-requires-equality/

–=–
Freaky Phallic Founders
–=–

The political laymen in their pious deliberations of law among those within the law society conduct their business in arched temples designed after the Holy Roman Empire and based on the Sacred Geometry of Freemasonry – the Mystery Religions. And all of those ancient symbols abound and adorn those government temples (see pictures throughout this essay). And they use the Holy Bible as a symbolic prop (furniture) to fool the people while swearing the sacra-ment oath to their own Masonic Deity that cares not about the Bible… other than to recognize it and “Christianity” as a “problem” for the Masonic constitution and rule.

Republican Rome has been a model for most major governments around the world, requiring that all laws go (pass) through two legislative bodies. It is also outlined in almost every “democratic” constitution that created new nations. In fact, Thomas Jefferson intended for some of his buildings to resemble the Roman temples, which he described as “one of the most beautiful, if not the most beautiful and precious morsel of architecture left us by antiquity.”

–=–

**Note that the Egyptian obelisk is a phallic symbol
worshiping the god Osiris and sun god Ra, and in less
common understanding denotes “Baal” worship.

–=–

“…the linham [male phallus] was an upright pillar.”

–W.Wynn Wescott, ‘Numbers: Their Occult Power and Mystic Virtues’,
Theosophical Publishing Society, 1902, p.33

–=–

Solar Temple of Nyuserr, Abusir, L’Archelologie Egypteinne,
Drawing, Gaston Maspero, 1907

Obelisk in New York’s Central Park

Obelisk in Paris, France

Cleopatras Needle (obelisk)  in London by dome

The Washington Monument obelisk
in a circle of flags.

–=–

“The Washington Monument, which lies directly west of the Capitol, is an obelisk, a tall, four-sided stone pillar tapering toward a pyramidal top. Some people believe that this is the most significant occult symbol of all. Most people are aware that an obelisk is Egyptian in origin, but few know the story behind it, and fewer still that it is an important Masonic symbol. In fact, the four obelisks which sit in four major Western cities, Paris, London, New York, and Washington, D.C., were erected specifically because of the efforts of, and large sums of money donated by, prominent and powerful nineteenth century Freemasons.”

–Michael Bradley Ph.D, ‘Secrets of the Freemasons’, ch. 8, p. 163, 2006

–=–

“King Jehu said to the guards and to the officers, ‘Go in and slay them; let none escape’. And they smote them with the sword; and the guards before the king threw their bodies out, and went into the inner dwelling of the house of Baal.
They brought out the obelisks [pillars] of the house of Baal and burned them.”

–2 Kings 10:26, (Amplified Bible)

–=–

“You shall make for your self no idols nor shall you erect a graven image,
pillar, or obelisk, nor shall you place any figured stone in your land
to which or on which to bow down; for I Am The Lord your God”.

–Leviticus 26:1 (Amplified Bible)

–=–

“Now when all this was finished, all Israel present there went out to the cities of
Judah and broke in pieces the pillars or obelisks, cut down the asherim,
and threw down the high places [of idolatry] and the altars in all Judah and Benjamin,
in Ephraim and Manasseh, until they had utterly destroyed them all”.

–2 Chronicles 31:1 (Amplified Bible)
(The “asherim” signify the “asherah poles”.)

–=–

Stone obelisk marking the grave of U.S. President James Madison,
the nation’s fourth president and father of the U.S. Constitution.

President Thomas Jefferson’s obelisk grave-site

–=–

“Before his death, Thomas Jefferson left specific instructions for a monument
to be constructed on his grave site.  In reference to the words to be
placed on his gravestone, Jefferson said,‘On the faces of the Obelisk
the following inscription, & not a word more.’¹ He continued by writing,
‘because by these, as testimonials that I have lived, I wish most to be remembered.’“

–1 The Library of Congress: Thomas Jefferson Exhibit

–=–

President Abraham Lincoln’s Grave-site

President Zachary Taylor’s Grave-site

Grave of President William Taft

President William Henry Harrison’s Grave-site

President Millard Fillmore Grave with pink obelisk

Obelisk commemorating the history of Morrow County

“WARREN G. HARDING — Morrow County’s favorite son”

Grave-site of President Warren G. Harding

–=–

“No man ever took the oaths and subscribed to the obligations
with greater watchfulness and care than I exercised in
receiving the various rites of Masonry, and I say with due
deliberation and without fear of breaking the faith.
I have never encountered a lesson, never witnessed an example,
never heard an obligation uttered which could not be
openly proclaimed to the world.”

–President of the United States, Warren G. Harding.

–=–

President Martin Van Buren’s Grave-site

President Andrew Johnson’s Grave with veiled obelisk

President Franklin Peirce’s obelisk grave marker

And on and on…

–=–

“The Masonic Burial”
Image from Masonic Family Magazine, 1878

–=–

“The obelisk is the most commonly used and the most blatant occult symbol used throughout the world. In ancient Egypt, the cult of this phallic symbol was associated with the god Osiris, who was cut in 13 pieces by Seth. Isis traveled far and beyond to retrieve all of Osiris’ body parts and was successful, except for one body part, the penis, which was swallowed by a fish. ‘The lost phallus’ is thus representative of male energy, and is almost always placed inside a circle, which represents female genitalia and energy. The obelisk in the middle of a circle represents the sexual act and the union of opposite forces. In our modern world, obelisks are found on nearly all important landmarks, and thus became and symbol of the occult elite’s power.”

–The Vigilant Citizen, Article on Sinister Sites – Israel Supreme Court, June 24th, 2009)

–=–

An obelisk in Vermont marking the birthplace of Mormon founder
and president Joseph Smith, cousin of L. Ron Hubbard and George Bush.

In Vermont, the innocent nature of members (the people) within the
Mormon Church can be seen as they celebrate Christ’s birth in front
of the phallic Egyptian obelisk commemorating the birth of  Joseph Smith.

Other leaders and presidents of the Mormon corporation that have obelisks as
tombstones include John Taylor, Lorenzo Snow, Hyrum Smith, and others.

“This white obelisk, dedicated in July 1921, served as the first
permanent marker erected to commemorate the arrival of
the Mormon pioneers into the Salt Lake Valley in 1847.”

–Utah State Historical Society

–=–

Seventh Day Adventist Church
Bella Vista Mayaguez, Puerto Rico

Battle Creek, Michigan Grave-site of Ellen G. White (Seventh-Day Adventist “Prophet”)
and her husband James White (President of Seventh Day Adventist General Conferences)

–=–

“My accompanying angel presented before me some of the errors
of those present, and also the truth in contrast with their errors.”

—Ellen White, Testimonies for the Church, vol. 1, pp. 84-87

–=–

Grave-site of J.N. Andrews in Basil. Switzerland
Seventh-day Adventist Church founder and also the 3rd elected President of the SDA
General Conference, editor of the Review and Herald (1869-1870) now the Adventist Review

Grave of Adventist pioneer E.L.H. Chamberlain, Middletown Cn

John Thomas, Founder of Chrisadelphians cult

“The Christadelphians have been with us since about 1848. They rose up after the Mormons, but prior to the Jehovah’s Witnesses and the Seventh-day Adventists. A man named John Thomas founded the group. The Disciples of Christ denomination attempted to discipline this man for his “strange doctrines,” but the discipline was not accepted by him. John Thomas drew off his own followers under their original name, the Royal Association of Believers in New York, now known as the Christadelphians.”

— Article from Jubilee International Inc. website

Jane Addams Memorial Park in Chicago, Illinois
founder of the Woman’s International League for Peace and Freedom (WILPF)
and first US woman to win the Nobel Peace Prize (1931).
Her husband was the Founder of the Illinois Republican Party.

Dorothy De Rothschild Grove,
at the Israel Supreme Court

Baroness Philippine Mathilde Camille de Rothschild
(Rothschild Banking Family)
Here she is shown confidently showcasing her Lucifarian jewelry,
with her Satan and Baphomet (goat) Necklaces.

American Baptist Theological Seminar
Nashville, Tn

Grave of Charles Wesley, composer of over 8,000 hymns,
whose brother John Wesley founded Methodism.

Grave-site of John Wesley, founder of Methodism

–=–

“The spires and pinnacles with which our old churches are decorated indeed, all uprights, including all the architectural families, and the varieties of tors, towers, and steeples, the especial mark and glory of Christian building, come from these ancient symbols. They are everywhere indicative of the Phallus, or index-finger denoting the “Fire”, the aspiring fire, against the inclination of gravity, which was the first vitalized idea, or Idol, worshiped magically and philosophically, the enlivening, godlike Power.”

–Hargrave Jennings (1817-1890), British Freemason, Rosicrucian and author on occultism and esotericism, “Phallicism: Celestial and Terrestrial; Heathen and Christian and its Connection with the Rosicrucian and the Gnostics and its foundation in Buddhism”, (p. 72, 1884)

–=–

Church of Christ in Sarasota, Fl

Seventh-Day Adventist Headquarters in Singapore

–=–

“You shall have no other gods before me.
You shall not make for yourself an idol in the form of anything in
heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the waters below.
You shall not bow down to them or worship them…”

–Exodus 20:3-6 (NIV)

–=–

“Man descended from the elemental Forces or Titans [Elohim], who fed on the body of the Pantheistic Deity creating the Universe by self-sacrifice, commemorates in sacramental observance this mysterious passion; and while partaking of the raw flesh of the victim, seems to be invigorated by a fresh draught from the fountain of universal life, to receive a new pledge of regenerated existence. Death is the inseparable antecedent of life; the seed dies in order to produce the plant, and earth itself is rent asunder and dies at the birth of Dionusos (Dionysus). Hence the significance of the phallus, or of its inoffensive substitute, the obelisk, rising as an emblem of resurrection by the tomb of buried Deity at Lerna or at Sais… And in this sense, as presiding over live and death, Dionusos is in the highest sense the LIBERTATOR (Liberty): since, like Osiris, he frees the soul and guides it in its migrations beyond the grave, preserving it from the risk of falling under the slavery of matter or some inferior animal form…”

This Egyptian obelisk was shipped from Heliopolis to Rome by Emperor Caligula in 37 C.E. Pope Sixtus V had Domenico Fonana move it in 1586 to the center of St. Peter’s Square at the Vatican, where it sits to this present day by the dome.

–=–

“The lost phallus’ is thus representative of male energy,
and is almost always placed (as in this case) inside a circle…”

–=–

The U.S. Capital Dome near Washington Monument obelisk

 
The Dome of the Capital building in Washington D.C. shows Freemason George Washington surrounded by “Liberty” and “Victory” in the clouds, as well as 13 heavenly maidens with stars above their heads. This fresco, painted by Constantino Brimidi in 1865, displays these goddesses holding the banner of E Pluribus Unem, supposedly representing the 13 colonies as “many united as one”.
–=–
Just what the 5-pointed star actually represents in ancient Masonic
sacred geometry will be revealed later in this presentation.

Dome of the Rock, Israel
(former Plantagenet British Kingdom of Jerusalem lost in 1200’s)

(Pagan) Pantheon of Hadrian with similar Dome.

Parthenon in Athens

United State Supreme Court Building

Statues of Confucius, Moses, and Solon adorn one of
the archways of the U.S. Supreme Court Building.
Is the United States a Confucian-Judea-Solonian Nation?

Coast Guard Memorial, Arlington National Cemetery –
The pyramid is the tip of the obelysk.

Statue of Orpheus that honors Francis Scott Key.

Why Orpheus?

Orpheus (Ὀρφεύς) was a legendary musician, poet, and prophet
in Greek mythology. Orpheus had the ability to charm all living things
and even stones with his music. He was a founder and prophet of
the “Orphic mysteries” and supposed composer of the Orphic Hymns.

In other words… he entered and held the minds of those who heard his music.

So too does the nationalistic patriotism of Francis Scott Key’s
Masonic poem “The Star Spangled Banner”, when orchestrated and sung.

Enter-tain-ent for the governed…

–=–
Voters Without Knowledge:
The Modern State Of America
–=–

Further scrutiny of the lack of knowledge of the citizens of the United States about their own government can be seen like clockwork every 4 years in yet more ceremony and ritual designed to fool the common people and divert their knowledge.

For in election time, the masses of people go through the useless motion of registering (obtaining legal residence in Washington D.C.) and standing in line to vote for a U.S. President that is, apparently unbeknownst to the vast majority of that population, actually indirectly elected by 538 congressional appointed electors every four years (not by the people). This seems to reveal that a great and purposeful culling of reason, logic, and especially knowledge has taken place within the population center of this nation of America – a people contractually enslaved by a corporation called United States, seemingly without their comprehension. It is this knowledge that must find its way into the hearts and minds of the indentured subjects of this corporate State, if for no other reason than to make them unfit to be slaves to a president they do not even elect. Only by exposing the true history of this central corporation we mistakenly call a country will the people ever be free to rid themselves of its tyranny.

For tyranny is freedom – the more laws to obey the more freedom to obey those laws we have. Freedom is a privilege granted by government, if you haven’t guessed, and is the exact opposite of being free…

–=–

“In reality, when the voters of North Carolina voted this past November,
they were actually voting to pick this slate of electors
instead of voting directly for the president and the vice-president.”

–Elaine Marshall, Secretary of State of North Carolina,
speaking at the 2012 Electoral College ceremony

–=–

It boggles the mind that anyone can really still believe that the appointment of the Commander In Chief of the United States military (U.S. President) would be left up to a “popular” vote of the common people! But apparently this illusion is a powerful one, as the millions upon millions of subjects are still voting in droves, urged on by the billions upon billions of dollars spent on maintaining the illusion with media enter-tain-ment; some standing in line for hours upon hours while suffering mental and physical abuses even as the actual election is held in college by congressional and political party appointed “electors”. So continues the illusion of choice by an indentured society that has no idea it is chained.

Article 2 of the constitution states:

Clause 1: Executive Power

The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. He shall hold his Office during the Term of four Years, and, together with the Vice President, chosen for the same Term, be elected, as follows…

Clause 2: Method of choosing electors

Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.

Clause 3: Electors

The Electors shall meet in their respective States, and vote by Ballot for two Persons… and the Votes shall then be counted. The Person having the greatest Number of Votes shall be the President, if such Number be a Majority of the whole Number of Electors appointed… But in choosing the President, the Votes shall be taken by States, the Representation from each State having one Vote; A quorum for this Purpose shall consist of a Member or Members from two thirds of the States, and a Majority of all the States shall be necessary to a Choice. In every Case, after the Choice of the President, the Person having the greatest Number of Votes of the Electors shall be the Vice President. But if there should remain two or more who have equal Votes, the Senate shall choose from them by Ballot the Vice President.

Notice there is no mention of the “the people” in this election for president, because the people do not elect the president. The people only hold the legal status of mere voters, fooled into empowering the appointed Electors with their votes (granting consent to the Electoral College), literally giving away their rights and individual power as a powerless body politic (many men with only one voice = E-Pluribus Unum = “Out of Many, One.”). The people vote for representatives, never realizing that the representatives then indirectly appoint the electors that elect the president. Of course, the people also don’t comprehend that the President is their virtual king under military rule, as established by the War Powers Act and Emergency Declarations, as we will discuss herein.

The Electors are the true electors of the president, not the voters (the people), no different than any other corporation and its board of directors (legislature) – for customers of Walmart do not elect its board or its president any more than U.S. voters do. But the illusion is maintained every four years through media and print at the cost of many billions of dollars – all based on the ridiculous and heavily media-promoted fallacy that the people vote and elect the president.

And the people believe…

And the knowledge stays hidden behind the belief, pomp, and circumstance…

And the people are thus quite fit to be slaves.

As written above, the “Representation from each State has one Vote”, not the people. Furthermore, this election process does not even require all States to participate, stating that the election process is done with at least a “quorum”, with members of the Electoral College from only “two thirds of the States”.

So what is a quorum?

From Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856:

QUORUM. Used substantively, quorum signifies the number of persons belonging to a legislative assembly, a corporation, society, or other body, required to transact business…”

And from Black’s Law 4rth:

QUORUM. A majority of the entire body; e. g., a quorum of a state supreme court… Such a number of the members of a body as is competent to transact business in the absence of the other members. The idea of a quorum is that, when that required number of persons goes into a session as a body, such as directors of a corporation, the votes of a majority thereof are sufficient for binding action. When a committee, board of directors, meeting of shareholders, legislature or other body of persons cannot act unless a certain number at least of them are present, that number 1s called a “quorum.” Sweet. In the absence of any law or rule fixing the quorum, it consists of a majority of those entitled to act.

The establishment and perceived legitimacy of a de facto (illegitimate) quorum is of utmost importance in the most corrupt of legislative processes called “democracy”. If anything, this process of quorum majority rule should tell you that the United States is in no way a republic, for the representation of a minority of one or even 1/3 of the population is certainly not being heard in a quorum (more on this later). It means that as long as enough seats are filled with like-minded (or like-blooded) legislators, generally more than 50%, it is likely that this quorum of combined votes ensures the will of the group.

If two out of the three judges at a chili cook-off are blood-cousins of one of the cooks, it matters not what the 1/3 vote of the non-blood-cousin is. The quorum of 2/3 blood will decide what good chili is, even if its the worst chili in the world.

And if a State and its representatives decide that they don’t like the choices for president, the fact that it does not participate in the election still forces that State to have that president elected by the other representative Electors of other States. In essence, this of all things means that States absolutely do not have rights and are absolutely not sovereign. It also destroys the myth of the United States being a republic. Obviously, in order to elect or legislate by majority rule or by quorum, the United States government by default cannot be a republic and represent all people, all states, or all minorities, and the minority of one. There is no federal republic.

This process of democracy also gives the illusion that outsiders and non-bloodline and non-Freemason men and women – of any race and any creed or religion – can not only obtain legislative seats but actually have a voice for minorities or even the majority. Of course, the quorum will always win, and the Masonic bloodline is always the quorum.

This knowledge is needed, not just for the purposes of exposing the fraud and making good men unfit to be slaves, but also to show just how important the “Election” of this political position as head of the United States Incorporated and Commander In Chief of an entire military actually is. For the implementation of law requires one thing above all others – violent enforcement.

This knowledge is at the forefront of the understanding of law and the true force behind it. Each President of the United States acts outside of Congress with declared “Emergency Powers”, giving Him the authority of the representatives of the people (congress) to issue Executive Orders and Presidential Directives. The declaration of a “National Emergency”, be it for perceived war, terrorism, famine, drought, weather, pandemic, Swine Flu, international sanctions, or for countless other reasons, ensures the virtually unlimited “War Powers” of the President of the United States – powers of war in peacetime without the actual declaration of war. Of this fact and the actions taken by that Commander in Chief of the military, Congress is powerless by its own choice. Congress does not reveal this fact to the people who call Congress their “Representatives”, and yet it is fully aware of the disposition of this political office of President and the emergency powers it holds. And remember that Congress’s power to be powerless rests in the sacrament of “Deity“. This is why control of the Election process is vital as shown above, and why it is not left up to the popular vote of American slaves. The election must be by men and women of the same blood and of the Temple (the Electors).

Perhaps most important here is to state clearly that the United States Executive Branch of government is not bound by the constitution while under a declaration of emergency, for the president is specifically granted powers that trump that constitution. For instance, the “privilege” of Habeas Corpus is and has been suspended by the Executive indefinitely due to national emergency status. In the end, the illusion that this U.S. government is or ever was operating in any way “constitutional” must certainly die here, today, if the people of America are ever to be free.

Of course, I will prove this claim now…

–=–
A National Emergency
–=–

Before we further examine the past, let’s look at the present state of the constitution of the United States…

The constitution has one fatal and purposeful flaw – it is changeable. It can be amended. It can be suspended. And all of its previous amendments can and have been altered or repealed by later amendments or by legislation. This, in effect, means that the United States has no foundation in law, for the law is ever changing to suit the powers desired by the leaders of the nation. More important is the realization that the constitution was purposefully written to include these certain future changes, just as every Bill and Act of congress is also written first and amended so as to be unrecognizable later on. As with Acts of Congress, all they cared about is that the people accept it and then re-accept the constitution as it is amended years later.

Its second major flaw is that the constitution is interpretable.

For instance, would you say that the opinion (interpretation) of Supreme Court Justice, Editor of the American Law Review, professor at Harvard Law School, and bloodline cousin of all presidents including the president who appointed him, Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. was at all “constitutional”?

“…It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind. The principle that sustains compulsory vaccination is broad enough  to cover cutting the Fallopian tubes. Three generations of imbeciles are enough.”

This was from the Buck vs. Bell, 1927, 8-1 decision upholding forced sterilization of women with bellow average intelligence in order to support a pure gene pool, for which the good of the state outweighed the rights and good of the individual.

So, in this one paragraph, it was declared constitutional to force surgical sterilization, force vaccination, force an I.Q. test, and to execute “degenerates” of lower than average intelligence.

In other words, the word “constitutional” is defined as whatever the court decides it is. The word is meaningless without honorable men making those decisions and giving meaning to the word. But the fact that this word “constitutional” is changeable and interpretable again shows that the foundation of law does not exist except as a changeable and lawless concept and tool of tyranny used to benefit the elite bloodline class.

Again we see with devious purpose that this document called the constitution was set up to be defeated. For each right it protects, it grants exceptions to that rule. And it allows government itself – the very entity that the constitution is designed to restrain – through the judicial branch of that government, to interpret the constitution as it sees fit. Thus, government legislates, polices, and prosecutes itself. In other words, if it chooses, the government is lawless – for the government is exempt from its own laws and constitution any time it chooses to be. This is the nature of a “sovereign” entity – for the sovereign lawmaker is always and by definition above its own law.

And this is exactly what government did… It rose above the constitution to grant itself literally unlimited power and authority, while still continuing the charade of the legislative and judicial process for the benefit of the knowledgeable, entertained, and governed people under it.

But the most important fact still remains generally unrealized by the people. And that is that the Executive Branch, as the enforcement arm of government, is the law. It controls the “Marshals of Law”. For Congress and the judicial have no power to back their laws or decisions if they have no military or police force under the Executive power to enforce them. Without military and police force, law is meaningless. And without honorable men in the military and police, whom themselves have knowledge, there can be no honor in law.

A declaration of national emergency by the Executive is very much the same as a declaration of War. It differs only in the fact that an actual war against another internationally recognized body politic (nation or country) does not exist. But this declaration is in effect a declaration of war against whatever is defined as the “emergency”. An emergency war against pandemic flu, for example, creates ample opportunity for tyranny and oppression, forced vaccination, quarantine and imprisonment, and even the killing of American Citizens as protection against the Emergency. These powers are not derived from the constitution, but from the extraordinary powers attained by that declaration outside of and above the constitution and congress and through the sacred oath as the rites of the City.

All you need to know is that the President is now and has for over 80 years been acting without constitutional limitations – despite what scripted and televised screenplays are shown to you on television and the news.

Perhaps the worst of these is the Declaration of Emergency against “Terrorism”. This esoteric and undefined “enemy” of the United States gives the President of the United States free reign to send His Executive military via Executive Privilege to any nation He chooses, including within the borders of His United States. It is a literal declaration of war on the emergency, which in this case is whatever the President or Congress defines as a “terrorist”, either foreign or domestic.

Note here that the word domestic means any and all Americans (citizens) can be designated as “terrorists” or “enemy of the State” at the president’s whim, and at varying levels of implementation and profiling. Surveillance, data collection, no-fly lists, terrorist watch lists, revocation of passport or other legal status, incarceration, rendition, and assassination are all tools declared legal and necessary under the Executive’s  emergency powers. The constitution or other protections of law do not apply under the rules of war, because there is no declared lawful war. This makes the new Utah NSA data center, for example, a legal business enterprise because it is being utilized to fight the declared “national emergency” of terrorism. To argue its invalidity under the constitution is pointless, because the Executive Branch and its Cabinets and Departments (including the NSA) are not operating under the bounds of the constitution – the NSA is operating under emergency powers, because the NSA is an Executive Branch agency. There is only one Executive Officer (Corporation Sole) who is elected by the Electors. All others are appointed (hired) as employees of that elected president. Thus, they all act under his authority, and his authority is not of the people but of the Congressional approved declared emergency. You must know that all of these extraordinary war and emergency powers only exist in times of declared emergency, and so this should be the center stage topic of your next president in any debate – demanding an end to all emergency powers and declarations. Congress will never do it for you, for they benefit greatly from this state of emergency and many if not most are blood cousins of all successive (and the current) president – the Roman line of rulers and councilmen within the Holy Rite to rule.

Importantly, without this emergency status in government, legislation like the Patriot Act would be otherwise unlawful or against the constitution. But emergency status creates legal (BAR) justification for those Acts, according to government. In this way the complacency and cooperation of congress can be understood, for congress creates the Executive Offices that the President utilizes in these emergencies.

–=–

In 1973, the Senate was charged with compiling a report of which it was to decide upon the efficacy and necessity of the continuance of these Emergency War Powers of the Executive Branch. This report was named Senate Report 93-549, and was commissioned by the “Special Committee on the Termination of the National Emergency”.

The report’s introduction opens as such:

“Since March the 9th, 1933, the United States has been in a state of declared national emergency… A majority of the people of the United States have lived all their lives under emergency rule… For 40 years, freedoms and governmental procedures guaranteed by the Constitution have, in varying degrees, been abridged by laws brought into force by states of national emergency… And, in the United States, actions taken by the government in times of great crisis have ­ from, at least, the Civil War ­ in important ways shaped the present phenomenon of a permanent state of national emergency.”

–=–

40 years before 1973…?

That’s right! For this abomination of legal tyranny was created when then President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, along with a zealous Congress, created the legal threshold that allowed for the Office of the President of the Untied States to usurp supreme power over His subjects (14th amendment Citizens) outside of and without Congressional approval. Once declared by congress, the constitution and congress were left virtually powerless against the actions of the president.

And none dare call it treason…

This first national emergency, declared in 1933, was presented to overcome the economic throws of the Great Depression and to instill a central banking structure to replace lawful money with legal tender (fiat). But in reality, it represented the indefinite suspension of the constitution of the United States in the scope of powers granted to the Executive Branch of government. In short, this temporary emergency power granted by Congress became a permanent fixture in the United States, and in 2013 this country is still suffering its creation.

Then newly elected president Franklin D. Roosevelt in his inaugural address on March 4rth, 1933 stated :

“I am prepared under my constitutional duty to recommend the measures that a stricken nation in the midst of a stricken world may require. These measures, or such other measures as the Congress may build out of its experience and wisdom, I shall seek, within my constitutional authority, to bring to speedy adoption. But in the event that the Congress shall fail to take one of these two courses, and in the event that the national emergency is still critical, I shall not evade the clear course of duty that will then confront me. I shall ask the Congress for the one remaining instrument to meat the crisis ­ broad Executive power to wage a war against the emergency, as great as the power that would be given to me if we were in fact invaded by a foreign foe.”

Notice that the president asked congress for this extraordinary power, he did not demand it. Also note that congress gave the Executive Branch this power by choice, and more importantly within its constitutional authority to do so!

It was the next day, March 5th of 1933, that President Roosevelt requested a special and extraordinary session of Congress (Proclamation 2038), which stated:

–=–

Proclamation 2038 – Calling Congress into Extraordinary Session, March 5, 1933

By the President of the United States of America

A Proclamation

Whereas public interests require that the Congress of the United States should be convened in extra session at twelve o’clock, noon, on the Ninth day of March, 1933, to receive such communication as may be made by the Executive;

Now, Therefore, I, Franklin D. Roosevelt, President of the United States of America, do hereby proclaim and declare that an extraordinary occasion requires the Congress of the United States to convene in extra session at the Capitol in the City of Washington on the Ninth day of March, 1933, at twelve o’clock, noon, of which all persons who shall at that time be entitled to act as members thereof are hereby required to take notice.

In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and caused to be affixed the great seal of the United States.

FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT

(Source: http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=14584)

–=–

Indeed, Congress was so assembled on March 9th, 1933, and the spawn of that assemblage gave to the office of president powers not only outside of and above the Constitution of the United States, but the Executive power to ignore congress and its processes altogether. There, president Roosevelt presented an Act enabling a declared national emergency in banking and for other purposes, stating:

“Be it enacted by the Senate and the House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, that the Congress hereby declares that a serious emergency exists and that it is imperatively necessary speedily to put into effect remedies of uniform national application.”

This became the “Act of March 9, 1933”, as written into Congressional law.

And this uniform national emergency power has been with us and over us ever since, as we will see… The only difference is that congress now allows the president to declare His own emergencies with no oversight or vote from congress as to its legitimacy or lawfulness. The congress acts as a “rubber stamp” for the presidential declaration of emergency without deliberation.

This “uniform” national application  mentioned here made way for the private enactment of what are called the “Uniform Acts”, including Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), which was first published in 1952.

Of the many states, one government…

In the United States, uniform laws are created through what are called “Uniform Acts“, which are bills proposed as state law by a private association. These Acts are drafted of course by the BAR association (part of the Executive Branch), mostly through their United States Uniform Law Commission (ULC), which is then approved by another private association: The National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (NCCUSL). The NCCUSL is a body of BAR Association lawyers, private and government attorneys, state and federal judges (attorneys in black robes), and university law professors (attorneys perverting young minds), typically appointed by the governor of each state. They draft laws with the goal of uniform enactment by each state, the District of Columbia, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and Puerto Rico. But the NCCUSL does not have any direct legislative power in and of itself as an appointed private association. Its drafted uniform acts become law only to the extent that they are enacted into law by state legislators (those Masonic blood-right representatives of the people) – not the actual vote of the masses of people of each state.

This is the horror of “representative democracy” – the mob rule of millions controlled (governed) by a few bloodline men.

And here we see again the importance of taking the power away from the masses of people (E-Pluribus Unum) and handing it over to these “representatives”. For the people would never vote to enact such uniform laws of debt and enslavement upon themselves to take away state’s rights. The people must be made impotent by the legal system and its quorum. Our 100’s of millions of voices must be squelched by “representative democracy”. Their BAR lawmakers must be appointed so that their congressmen can thus approve those laws as supposed representatives of the people. In the end, the people do not make law; the BAR and private corporations draft law and the Congress approves it!

Over 100 uniform laws and acts have been created by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (NCCUSL), which have since been approved and adopted for the people (not by the people) under this Executive national emergency status. Chances are at least one of these effects your life in “interstate commerce”, including the Child Protection Services (CPS) agency that has kidnapped, harmed, and murdered so many of our children as “property” of government. They include:

1. Uniform Adoption Act (1994)
2. Uniform Alcoholism and Intoxication Treatment Act (1971)
3. Uniform Anatomical Gift Act (2006)
4. Uniform Apportionment of Tort Responsibility Act (2002)
5. Uniform Arbitration Act (2000)
6. Uniform Athlete Agents Act (2000)
7. Uniform Act to Secure the Attendance of Witnesses from Without a State in Criminal Proceedings (1936)
8. Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act (1995)
9. Uniform Child Abduction Prevention Act (2006)
10. Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act (1968)
11. Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (1997)
12. Uniform Collateral Consequences of Conviction Act (2009)
13. Uniform Commercial Code (2001)
14. Uniform Common Interest Ownership Act (1982) (1994)
15. Uniform Common Trust Fund Act (1938) (1952)
16. Uniform Comparative Fault Act (1977) (1979)
17. Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act (proposed, 1999; withdrawn, 2002)
18. Uniform Condominium Act (1977) (1980)
19. Uniform Conflict of Laws—Limitations Act (1982)
20. Uniform Conservation Easement Act (1981)
21. Uniform Construction Lien Act (1987)
22. Uniform Consumer Credit Code (1968) (1974)
23. Uniform Consumer Leases (2001)
24. Uniform Controlled Substances Act (1990) (1994)
25. Uniform Correction or Clarification of Defamation Act (1993)
26. Uniform Custodial Trust Act (1987)
27. Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act (1964) (1966)
28. Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act (1922)
29. Uniform Determination of Death Act (1978) (1980)
30. Uniform Disclaimer of Property Interests Act (1999)
31. Uniform Disclaimer of Transfers by Will, Intestacy or Appointment Act (1978)
32. Uniform Disposition of Community Property Rights at Death Act (1971)
33. Uniform Division of Income for Tax Purposes Act (1957)
34. Uniform Dormant Mineral Interests Act (1986)
35. Uniform Durable Power of Attorney Act (1979) (1987)
36. Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (1999)
37. Uniform Employment Termination Act (1991)
38. Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act (1964)
39. Uniform Environmental Covenants Act
40. Uniform Estate Tax Apportionment Act (1958) (1982)
41. Uniform Exemptions Act (1976) (1979)
42. Uniform Extradition and Rendition Act (1980)
43. Uniform Federal Lien Registration Act (1978) (1982)
44. Uniform Fiduciaries Act (1922)
45. Uniform Foreign Money Claims Act (1989)
46. Uniform Foreign Money Judgments Recognition Act (1962)
47. Uniform Franchise and Business Opportunities Act (1987)
48. Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (1984)
49. Uniform Gifts to Minors Act
50. Uniform Guardianship and Protective Proceedings Act (1997)
51. Uniform Health-Care Decisions Act (1993)
52. Uniform Health-Care Information Act (1985)
53. Uniform International Wills Act (1977)
54. Uniform Interstate Arbitration of Death Taxes Act (1943)
55. Uniform Interstate Compromise of Death Taxes Act (1943)
56. Uniform Interstate Depositions and Discovery Act (2007)
57. Uniform Interstate Enforcement of Domestic Violence Protection Orders Act (2000)
58. Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (1992) (1996) (2001)
59. Uniform Intestacy, Wills, and Donative Transfers Act (1991) (1993)
60. Uniform Land Security Interest Act (1985)
61. Uniform Land Transactions Act (1975)
62. Uniform Limited Liability Company Act (1996)
63. Uniform Limited Partnership Act (2001)
64. Uniform Management of Institutional Funds Act (1972)
65. Uniform Management of Public Employee Retirement Systems Act (1997)
66. Uniform Mandatory Disposition of Detainers Act (1958)
67. Uniform Marital Property Act (1983)
68. Uniform Marketable Title Act (1990)
69. Uniform Marriage and Divorce Act (1970) (1973)
70. Uniform Mediation Act (2003)
71. Uniform Money Services Act (2000)
72. Uniform Multiple-Person Accounts Act (1969) (1989)
73. Uniform Nonprobate Transfers On Death (1989)
74. Uniform Notarial Acts (1982)
75. Uniform Parentage Act (1973) (2000)
76. Uniform Partition of Heirs Property Act (2010)
77. Uniform Partnership Act (1994) (1997)
78. Uniform Periodic Payment of Judgments Act (1990)
79. Uniform Photographic Copies As Evidence Act (1949)
80. Uniform Planned Community Act (1980)
81. Uniform Post-Conviction Procedure Act (1980)
82. Uniform Premarital Agreement Act (1983)
83. Uniform Pretrial Detention Act (1989)
84. Uniform Principal and Income Act (1997) (2001)
85. Uniform Probate Code (1969) (1975) (1982) (1987) (1989) (1990) (1991) (1997)
86. Uniform Probate Code Vi (1989) (1998)
87. Uniform Prudent Investor Act (1994)
88. Uniform Punitive Damages Act (1996)
89. Uniform Putative and Unknown Fathers Act (1988)
90. Uniform Real Estate Cooperative Act (1981)
91. Uniform Real Estate Time-Share Act (1980) (1982)
92. Uniform Real Property Electronic Recording Act (2004)
93. Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (1968)
94. Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act (1972)
95. Uniform Rights of the Terminally Ill Act (1989)
96. Uniform Rules of Criminal Procedure (1974) (1987)
97. Uniform Rules of Evidence Act (2005)
98. Uniform Securities Act (1956) (1985) (amended 1988) (2002)
99. Uniform Simultaneous Death Act (1940) (1993)
100. Uniform State Administrative Procedure Act (1981)
101. Uniform Status of Children of Assisted Conception Act (1988)
102. Uniform Statute and Rule Construction Act (1995)
103. Uniform Statutory Form Power of Attorney Act (1988)
104. Uniform Statutory Rule Against Perpetuities (1986) (1990)
105. Uniform Supervision of Trustees for Charitable Purposes Act (1954)
106. Uniform Surface Use and Mineral Development Accommodation Act (1990)
107. Uniform Tod Security Registration Act (1989)
108. Uniform Testamentary Additions to Trusts Act (1960) (1991)
109. Uniform Trade Secrets Act (1979) (1985)
110. Uniform Transboundary Pollution Reciprocal Access Act (1982)
111. Uniform Transfer of Litigation Act (1991)
112. Uniform Transfers to Minors Act (1983) (1986)
113. Uniform Transfers Under Nontestamentary Instruments Act (1978)
114. Uniform Trust Code (2000)
115. Uniform Trustees’ Powers Act (1964)
116. Uniform Unclaimed Property Act (1995)
117. Uniform Unincorporated Nonprofit Association Act (1992) (1996)
118. Uniform Victims of Crime Act (1992)

Imagine… all of these “Acts” are unlawful, de facto, prima facie, absolutely demolish any form of State’s sovereignty, and are created under military occupation and rule by a corrupted law society. They are then forced upon we, the contracted people/commodities of that corporate occupation. And none of them were written by the people or by the representatives of the people, but by the very BAR attorneys who administrate their own uniform codes for profit on an international scale and in their own court system.

For those of you who still believe in the mythological “States Rights” we so often hear about but never actually see, this uniformity of law – especially the UCC and Acts like #100 from the above list (Uniform State Administrative Procedure Act) – destroys any such notion. Like the people, States rights have been usurped by uniform codes that turn all 50 States into one powerless voice as represented. Of course under the rules of war, States only really exist at the discretion of the Executive Commander in Chief and those who control Him under military rule, as we will see. Of course, this does something much worse than eliminate states rights, for it implements international laws between nations, including the United States.

In the United Nations, the United States is not referred to as a “nation”, but is instead referred to as a “State” of the United Nations, just as California and New York are referred to as “States” of the United States. The word “of” means belonging to under law. And each nation as a member of the United Nations is now operating under these same or similar internationally scaled uniform codes. Thus the illusion and conceptual romanticism of the word sovereignty must also be stated here as a patriotic fallacy promoted by this militarily ruling United States corporation and bloodline through its media monopolies and its similar monopoly on the university and public school system’s curriculum.

Bouvier’s 1856 explains some important aspects of just what sovereignty is, and we must always remember that sovereignty does not exist if challenged and defeated or taken via treaty by a military force greater than the sovereign’s… as is the case with the former militias of each state of America and each individual that is allowed to believe he or she is a sovereign on the land. Only a nation or kingdom with a military force can truly be sovereign…

SOVEREIGN. A chief ruler with supreme power; one possessing sovereignty. It is also applied to a king or other magistrate with limited powers. 2. In the United States the sovereignty resides in the body of the people.

For those “man on the land” free men out there who also claim that each man is a sovereign or king of himself or that the constitution states as much, you couldn’t be more erroneous in your summation of what this word sovereign means. For a man cannot be a sovereign unless he unlawfully or lawfully rules other men, which always means the use of force of law. Thus, no honorable man can justify this position of sovereign ruler of men. Note here also the fallacy that claims sovereignty has residence in the “body” of people. But this would mean that all people rule over all other people simultaneously (i.e. self-government), and this just isn’t the case. The “body politic” is ruled by government (mind control) and its congress, not by the common people. No matter how you define this word, there can be no honor in being a sovereign, for it requires the forceful subjection to your will by other men. In other words, a man with no subjects is not qualified to claim sovereignty because there is no body to rule over. And this again shows that force is absolutely necessary in any form of law, be it defense or offense. A republic is the law of one man over himself in agreement with other like-minded individuals. The problem is that honor is not a requirement in law as force is. And the people delegate their individual power over to the government.

Your pet is about the closest thing you might be considered a sovereign of, and yet government requires vaccines, tags, licenses, papers, and other permissions letting you know you are not a sovereign. Same goes with your children.

Keep in mind that if law is considered to be the sovereign law of the land, then the supreme chief ruler is the law, and the creators via the enforcers of that law are thus the true sovereign ruler with supreme violent power. A sovereign is a dictator, no matter how moral or full of ethics and niceties you set that dictatorship up to be. For the sovereign dictates the law, be it one man or many men on a council. So here we can see again that the patriotic and romantic idea and belief in and of sovereignty is more dangerous than the standing army behind the real sovereign. No natural man should claim legal status under any sovereign authority, for a sovereign must by necessity act as if it were above God’s law (natural law).

The reality is that if you have a legal status as “equal” people and citizens then you are also subject to all other rights and devices of that sovereign, including pain, punishment, taxes, and extortion (exaction). There is nothing in between. If you are equal under the law, then you are in a state of servitude to a sovereign. Only an outlaw (a lone ranger) can be a free man, and then only while he can defend his or here realm (land, home, possessions, and life) against other sovereign powers who seek his or her subjection to that sovereign authority. To do this, that man must be sovereign over other men for purposes of defense, which makes being a sovereign always either a position of no honor as forceful ruler or a pointless endeavor due to lack of military force that will protect that status.

The Masonic trick, of course, is to convince all or most of the individual people to all give up their individual natural rights, which otherwise gives them a naturally free disposition as “outlaws”, to become a member of the body politic via accepting membership (citizenship) and contractually assigning their sovereignty over to a “representative”. In the U.S. Code, a representative Congressman or Senator is defined as an “employee of the United States” government. Of course, only corporations can have employees. As per the above definition and all that has been disclosed thus far, it should be obvious that the OFFICE of the president of the United States is now the CHIEF RULER WITH SUPREME POWER!

SOVEREIGN STATE. One which governs itself independently of any foreign power.

Here again, it should be obvious that no State within the union of the United States governs (controls) itself independently from any foreign power. The foreign power is the United States central government (Washington D.C.) – the sacred theocracy!!!

SOVEREIGNTY. The union and exercise of all human power possessed in a state; it is a combination of all power; it is the power to do everything in a state without accountability; to make laws, to execute and to apply them: to impose and collect taxes, and, levy, contributions; to make war or peace; to form treaties of alliance or of commerce with foreign nations, and the like. 2. Abstractedly, sovereignty resides in the body of the nation and belongs to the people. But these powers are generally exercised by delegation (i.e. power of attorney). 3. When analyzed, sovereignty is naturally divided into three great powers; namely, the legislative, the executive, and the judiciary; the first is the power to make new laws, and to correct and repeal the old; the second is the power to (violently) execute the laws both at home and abroad; and the last is the power to apply the laws to particular facts; to judge the disputes which arise among the citizens, and to punish crimes. 4. Strictly speaking, in our republican forms of government, the absolute sovereignty of the nation is in the people of the nation; (q. v.) and the residuary sovereignty of each state, not granted to any of its public functionaries, is in the people of the state.

So a sovereign is not under or subject to even its own law! Welcome to the United States…

It acts “without accountability” according to its own created sovereign law. So why would any man wish to be a citizen under a sovereign, be it another man or government? In truth, this question only becomes apparent to ask when one finally realizes he is enslaved by his sovereign – his Ruler and Chief military officer behind the force of law – and that he in no way lives in a “free country”.

Far from it…

Remember, Bouvier’s Law Dictionary was commissioned and compiled well before Roosevelt’s first national emergency was declared, and is the most representative and honest legal view of the time per the creation of the constitution and its legal language, commissioned by and entered officially into the constitution, congress, the Supreme Court, etc. And also remember that in 1933, congress as the representatives of the people of all states, voted to (temporarily) suspend the constitution and grant the “power of the people” and of the “states” to the newly granted extraordinary powers of the Executive Office to act as temporary sovereign through emergency declaration; an act that has never been repealed. And this action is perfectly constitutional!!!

It is also extremely important to comprehend that just like the kings and queens of England who gained their authority from the office granted to them via the crown temple (Masonic church), the president is only the current person (lesser monarch) occupying the Office, which is the corporate entity that holds the authority (permission) granted by the people (via Congress). It is the United States corporation that holds this tyrannical  power, not the president as a man. For the man is appointed by the government (church). So blaming the man is a worthless endeavor, especially when the man is just the latest in a series of blood-cousins of the Monarchs of England who’s Corporation Sole will simply be passed on to his cousin. More importantly, it is the people’s belief in that power and authority (the people’s permission) that gives legitimacy to that power of the United States and its current president as their “Chief Ruler”.

As with any cult, belief by its members is the key to a cult’s authority – the permission of the people to rule over them.

–=–
Monarchy:
The Ritual Mocking Of God
–=–

Before we continue with this national emergency status as it applies today, it is interesting to note that the Divine Right Monarchs are granted their powers only when sanctioned by the process of religious Coronation (custom), which literally means that they are anointed with oil in the Church. This custom extends to both Judaism and Masonry, as well as many forms of Christianity.

The Hebrew word for Christ or “Christos” translates to mean “anointed”, or “the anointed”.

Thus when we say Jesus the Christ, we are really saying Jesus the Anointed.

The difference between the Biblical Christ and the Monarch men and women who claim the Christ-like power of God on Earth is that in the story of the Bible, the living Christ did not need the temporal Churches’ approval to be the chosen (anointed) by and as the Son of God, while inversely these bloodline cousins who psychotically claim to be and rule through “God” by their Crown and Coronation rituals must be appointed and physically anointed by the church in a ceremonial custom. While Christ was spiritually anointed without ritual or ceremony, Monarchs and president/prophets of incorporated churches must be temporally anointed in ritual fashion.

Considering the fact that King James and other Royal Monarchs commissioned their own versions of the Holy Bible (certainly a fact that bears at the minimum several conflicts of interest about the true history of the Lord of Lords and King of Kings), don’t you ever wonder why the Church of England and its anointed Christian (God/Christ-like) kings and queens should seemingly be so afraid of and demonize the Biblical “Anti-Christ” in their own re-translated Bibles? Just why would these sovereign rulers claiming to rule by God’s power wish to make the people who are subject to the will of the church and of that king or queen so very afraid of the “anti-Christ”?

Anti-Christ = Anti-Anointed = Anti-Monarchs.

The allegory of the Anti-Christ… A scary story told to ensure the strangle-hold of the appointed/anointed Monarchs who claim God’s kingdom for themselves over the people. Beware the anti-Christ!!!

Are not the Coronation (anointed) Monarchs and Ecclesiastical churches and the Pope claiming to be God; claiming to rule by God’s word and authority (permission)? Does this not make them as an artificial Christ/God on Earth – the great pretenders acting in Christ’s place? And if indeed their power is blasphemously derived from the personification of the Christos as God, church, and government, would these artificial Christ-men and women not certainly wish for their subjects to fear the thought of an anti-Christ that would strip them of that Divine Right to Rule God’s earthly kingdom?

After all, according to their sacred articles and doctrines, they rule in God’s absence not in His presence.

And this begs an examination of the Christ story itself, especially when considering that Freemasonry refers to it as an allegory of the Sun (god), and that the Crown Queen of England is a most high Masonic seat…

And so I have my own thoughts on the subject, which I include here only as food for thought:

Death is anti-Life. For life is truly the opposite of death, and life on Earth is certainly the opposite of any possible “after-life”. The concept of reincarnation is not after-life, for it is the karma of the next life, and therefore not necessarily opposed to nature on Earth. Living in this life on Earth is natural, while living in or after death is wholly unnatural (not of nature/Earth). Very importantly and as we have discussed, these words natural and unnatural very much relate to law as well. Natural law is also called “God’s Law”. This natural law is what the Biblical Jesus the “Christos” reportedly taught to his disciples when he was in the form of a natural man and only when He was alive on Earth – as written in the story of the Bible. But in the legal realm of artificial things and citizens (artificial persons), man’s (man-made/artificial) political contract law is actually very much against or anti-natural law (anti-God’s Law). Governments and churches certainly could be said to be against or “anti-Christ’s” terrestrial teachings of nature to do no harm to others or their property, for government and ecclesiastical law is a violation of natural law in that a political right is designed to take away a natural right (to enslave). And so it is my opinion and thesis here that a great and deceitful trick has been played upon the people of Earth, using the rituals and ceremonies of religions to cover up the true Christian teachings of the translated Bible in order to use “Christianity” and other forms of corporate religion to justify the bloodline rule of the common people – for men to rule as if they were gods. The same could be said about the Declaration of Independence and its use in justifying the constitution, despite the fact that the constitution is in direct violation of that Declaration. The Monarchy and Corporate religions are in direct violation of Christ. These churches could, in this light, be referred to as anti-Christ.

–=–

“Pharaoh… Let my people go, that they may serve me.”

–Moses

–=–

Pharaoh – Hebrew פַּרְעֹה (par‘ōh), from Egyptian pr ˤ3 (“palace, pharaoh”),
literally pr (“house”) + ˤ3 (“great, big”):

The supreme ruler of ancient Egypt; a formal address for the sovereign seat of power
as personified by the ‘king’ in an institutional role of Horus son of Osiris;
often used by metonymy for Ancient Egyptian sovereignty.

–=–

Could not the same be said of and to reigning sovereigns of government today? For “Pharaoh was an office, not a man. It was the “House” that claimed superiority and “sovereignty” over the people via the Pagan gods.

And so the holy book of today might be written:

Obama… let my people go!

Queen Elizabeth II… let my people go!

Pope… let my people go!

Mormon Prophet… let my people go!

Israel… let my people go!

…So that we may all serve God and His nature instead of worshiping and tithing in your artificial ritualistic anti-God corporations.

–=–

The bloodline:
Obama is the 22nd Great-Grandson of William the Conqueror

–=–

Considering that law and governments have always been Ecclesiastical in nature – from the Roman civilization to the Vatican to the Kingdom of England and its Divine Church to America itself – this literally makes the church and its government anti-God, for to be against the laws of nature (the natural rights of men) is to be against the laws of God. For God accordingly would be the One who created and is all of nature. And when we consider that every corporate Christian church teaches men to obey the laws of the land, and that the definition for “laws of the land” are in fact of the artificial man-made Masonic governments, its man-made Masonic constitution, and its man-made legal codes that usurp and destroy everything in nature including rights, we can see that the government corporations known as churches and religions are really teaching the opposite of the Biblical story of the living Christ, who taught natural law. The law of the land is not natural law. It is not God’s law. And the law of the land (man’s law) in government is quite often opposite to or anti-Christ’s teachings, certainly quite often anti-life, and definitely anti-nature. For government and religion is of men, not of God.

But when we consider the fact that the corporate “Church” has always been the source of man’s law, a whole new element and historical view of the role of the Church in government and as government rears its ugly head. For the church if anything is against the living Christ in favor of the dead one; ruling in God’s name on Earth while going against the teachings of the Christos as a government supposedly ordained by Go, and even as it promotes the empty promise and anticipation of His return. In the Biblical story of His life, Christ taught God’s natural law. In death, God’s law of nature has been negated by the church/government by the falsely anointed kings, which claim to act through God upon the sacred rite of Christos (Coronation). So how can the church not be called anti-Christ when it claims man’s authority over nature (over God)? For God’s kingdom, if nothing else, is nature itself.

Was Jesus a member of a corporate church or government, or did He deny such temporal and ritualistic things.

Aren’t we to do what Jesus did?

If Jesus were made a citizen of the United States before He could walk, speak, or rationally consent to such a contractual relationship as a constitutor to the United States, what would Jesus do to end that literal bondage? Would he tell his people to obey the law of the land, government, and church?

Would he not instead demand that the modern-day Pharaoh’s of all the nations let his people go in God’s name?

Isn’t being a Christian tantamount to acting in Jesus’ name and teachings?

Isn’t it time to start acting like the Christian you claim to be?

If we really think about it, the dogma within the upper echelon (not the common people) of corporate religion based around their falsely projected Christianity is actually a death cult – worshiping the unnatural state of a man living in death (spirit). Just as they claim to be Jews but are not, they claim to be Christians but are not. All they really are is a spiritual assembly of government (mind control) – the gatekeepers to true spirituality through their rewritten Bibles teachings and ritual.

Whether or not this is a good or bad thing is quite irrelevant, and offense is certainly not the intention here. Again we must remember that the common people of the church who worship individually – as well as the common people of the nation – are not the subject of this writing. For it is the Holy incorporation of the church and its religious doctrine and claimed authorities that is being used by that corporation to claim the power of God on Earth not by the common people, but by these chosen anointed few over the common people and Earth (nature).

We of course see the word spirit in legal definitions, for again we must acknowledge that all law is derived from ecclesiastical sacra-ment and implemented via bloody force (as documented clearly in the Bible and in history).

SPIRITUAL. Relating to religious or ecclesiastical persons or affairs, as distinguished from “secular” or lay, worldly, or business matters. As to spiritual “Corporation”, “Courts”, and “Lords”, see those titles.

SPIRITUALITIES OF A BISHOP. Those profits which a bishop receives in his ecclesiastical character, as the dues arising from his ordaining and instituting priests, and such like, in contradistinction to those profits which he acquires in his temporal capacity as a baron and lord of parliament, and which are termed his “temporalities,” consisting of certain lands, revenues, and lay fees, etc.

SPIRITUALITY OF BENEFICES. In ecclesiastical law. The tithes of land, etc.

BENEFICE. In ecclesiastical law. In its technical sense, this term includes ecclesiastical preferments to which rank or public office is attached, otherwise described as ecclesiastical dignities or offices, such as bishoprics, deaneries, and the like; but in popular acceptation, it is almost invariably appropriated to rectories, vicarages, perpetual curacies, district churches, and endowed chapelries. “Benefice” is a term derived from the feudal law, in which it signified a permanent stipendiary estate, or an estate held by feudal tenure.

BENEFICE. In French law. A benefit or advantage, and particularly a privilege given by the law rather than by the agreement of the parties.

I must declare here that only the demented mind of an attorney or psychopath could create the definition of spirituality as a tithe or profit (money).

The benefits of our United States “politicians” are certainly not based upon an agreement of the people, and are certainly a privilege given to themselves by their own laws for which they themselves create from within their spiritual corporation of public office!!!

And I must say that If God ever does touch down on earth again to reappear in the natural realm as God on Earth and Lord King, He certainly would not need the approval (physical act of anointment) of even the most Saintly of priest, king, queen, government, or parliament. For priests and kings supposedly attain their power from God, not the other way around. God would not need man’s approval or ceremony for anything that He chose to do, if I’m not mistaken. Yet apparently those Popes, priests, kings, queens, and presidents believe that they are all God’s chosen ones to command on behalf of God on Earth from somewhere in the anti-earth (after-life).

–=–
Long Live the Queen,
Long Live King Solomon!
–=–

In the following video of the coronation of the queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and all of that crown temple’s political land mass possessions, we can clearly see that this is a religious ceremony as opposed to a solely governmental one. This is obvious and is a well known fact, considering the queen or king is also being given the sacramentum (the sacred oath) and becoming the anointed bloodline Masonic head of the Church of England.

The king or queen according to the medieval view was mixta persona (i.e., both layman and ecclesiastic) and therefore obtained spiritualis jurisdictionis capax (a fit subject for spiritual jurisdiction).

That’s right… spiritual jurisdiction; as in the jurisdiction of some other-worldly god.

The Catholic Church explains:

(You may click on the red/blue links for more detail)

“By ministerial authority, which is conferred by an act of consecration, is meant the inward, and, because of its indelible character, permanent capacity to perform acts by which Divine grace is transmitted. By ruling authority, which is conferred by the Church (missio canonica, canonical mission), is understood the authority to guide and rule the Church of God. Jurisdiction, in so far as it covers the relations of man to God, is called jurisdiction of the internal forum or jurisdiction of the forum of Heaven (jurisdictio poli)… Jurisdiction, in so far as it regulates external ecclesiastical relations, is called jurisdiction of the external forum, or briefly jurisdictio fori. This jurisdiction, the actual power of ruling is legislative, judicial, or coactive… Ordinary jurisdiction is that which is permanently bound, by Divine or human law, with a permanent ecclesiastical office. Its possessor is called an ordinary judge. By Divine law the pope has such ordinary jurisdiction for the entire Church and a bishop for his diocese. By human law this jurisdiction is possessed by the cardinals, officials of the Curia and the congregations of cardinals, the patriarchs, primates, metropolitans, archbishops, the praelati nullius, and prelates with quasi-epsicopal jurisdiction, the chapters of orders, or, respectively, the heads of orders, cathedral chapters in reference to their own affairs, the archdiaconate in the Middle Ages, and parish priests in the internal forum… Temporary exercise of ordinary and quasi-ordinary jurisdiction can be granted, in varying degrees, to another as representative, without conferring on him an office properly so called. In this transient form jurisdiction is called delegated or extraordinary, and concerning it canon law, following the Roman law, has developed exhaustive provisions. This development began when the popes, especially since Alexander III (1159-81), found themselves obliged, by the enormous mass of legal business which came to them from all sides as the “judices ordinarii omnium” to hand over, with proper instruction, a large number of cases to third parties for decision, especially in matters of contentious jurisdiction. Delegated jurisdiction rests either on a special authorization of the holders of ordinary jurisdiction (delegatio ab homine), or on a general law (delegatio a lege, a jure, a canone)…

The Church has the right, as a perfect and independent society provided with all the means for attaining its end, to decide according to its laws disputes arising concerning its internal affairs, especially as to the ecclesiastical rights of its members, also to carry out its decision, if necessary, by suitable means of compulsion, contentious or civil jurisdiction. It has, therefore, the right to admonish or warn its members, ecclesiastical or lay, who have not conformed to its laws and also, if needful to punish them by physical means, that is, coercive jurisdiction. The church has, first, the power to judge sin. This it does in the internal forum. But a sin can be at the same time externally a misdemeanour or a crime (delictum, crimen), when threatened with external ecclesiastical or civil punishment. The Church also judges ecclesiastical crimes in the external forum by infliction of penalties, except when the wrong doing has remained secret (Clint says: think secret child ritual sexual abuse). In this case it contents itself, as a rule, with penance voluntarily assumed. Finally, another distinction is to be drawn between necessary jurisdiction and voluntary jurisdiction; the latter contemplates voluntary subjection on the part of those who seek in legal matters the co-operation of ecclesiastical agencies, e.g. notarially executed instruments, testaments, etc. The judicial power described above, jurisdiction strictly so called, was given by Christ to His Church, was exercised by the Apostles, and transmitted to their successors (Matthew 18:15 sqq.; 1 Corinthians 4:21; 5:1 sqq.; 2 Corinthians 13:10; 1 Timothy 1:20; 5:19 sq.).

From the beginning of the Christian religion the ecclesiastical judge, i.e. the bishop, decided matters of dispute that were purely religious in character (causae mere ecclesiasticae). This jurisdiction of the Church was recognized by the civil (imperial) power when it became Christian. But long before this the early Christians, following the exhortation of Saint Paul (1 Corinthians 6:14), were wont to submit to ecclesiastical jurisdiction matters which by their nature belonged to the civil courts. As long as Christianity was not recognized by the State it was left to the conscience of the individual whether he would conform to the decision of the bishop or not. When, however, Christianity had received civil recognition, Constantine the Great raised the former private usage to a public law. According to an imperial constitution of the year 321 the parties in dispute could, by mutual agreement, bring the matter before the bishop even when it was already pending before a civil judge, and the latter (judge) was obliged to put into effect the decision of the bishop. A further constitution of 331 provided that in any stage of the suit any one of the parties could appeal to the bishop even against the will of the others (Hanel, “De constitutionibus, quas F. Sirmondus, Paris, an. 1631 edidit,” 1840). But Arcadius, in 398, and Honorius, in 408, limited the judicial competence of the bishop to those cases in which both parties applied to him (lex VII, Cod. Just., De audientia episc., I, iv). This arbitral jurisdiction of the bishop was not recognized in the new Teutonic kingdoms. In the Frankish kingdoms purely ecclesiastical matters of dispute belonged to the jurisdiction of the bishop, but mixed cases, in which civil interests appeared, e.g. marriage questions, law suits concerning Church property, etc., belonged to the civil courts.

In the course of the Middle Ages the Church succeeded in extending its jurisdiction over all matters that offered an ecclesiastical interest (causae spiritualibus annexae), all litigation concerning marriages (c. vii, X, Qui filii sint legit., IV, xvii; c. vii, X, De donat., IV, xx); matters concerning burial (X, De sepult., III, xxviii); testaments (X, De testam., III, xxvi); compacts ratified with an oath (c. iii, in VI°, De foro compet., II, ii); matters pertaining to benefices (c. ii, X, De suppl. neglig. praelat., I, x); questions of patronage (X, De jur. patron., III, xxxviii); litigation concerning church property and tithes (X, De decim., III, xxx). In addition all civil litigation in which the element of sin was in question (ratio peccati) could be summonded before an ecclesiastical court (c. xiii, X, De judic., II, i).

Ecclesiastical Person

In its etymological sense this expression signifies every person who forms a part of the external and visible society which constitutes the Church, and who has not been canonically expelled therefrom. But the expression is rarely used in this sense; customarily it indicates persons whom a special tie connects with the Church, either because they have received ecclesiastical tonsure, minor, or higher orders, and are a fortiori invested with a power of jurisdiction; or because they have taken vows in a religious order or congregation approved by the Church. This more intimate union with the Church involves particular duties which are not incumbent on the general faithful (see CLERIC).

–=–

“Her Majesty being now Anointed; wearing the Colobium Sindonis
and the Supertunica or Close Pall of cloth of gold, together with a girdle of the same,
is seated once more in King Edward’s Chair.”

The Queen, as soon as she enters at the west door of the Church, is to be received with this Anthem:

Psalm 122, 1–3, 6, 7.
I was glad when they said unto me:
We will go into the house of the Lord.
Our feet shall stand in thy gates:
O Jerusalem.
Jerusalem is built as a city:
that is at unity in itself.
O pray for the peace of Jerusalem:
they shall prosper that love thee.
Peace be within thy walls:
and plenteousness within thy palaces.

later, other Psalms are read:

Psalm 84, 9, 10.
Behold, O God our defender:
and look upon the face of thine Anointed.
For one day in thy courts:
is better than a thousand.

I Kings 1, 39, 40.
Zadok the priest and Nathan the prophet anointed Solomon king;
and all the people rejoiced and said
God save the king,
Long live the king,
May the king live for ever. Amen. Hallelujah.

(**Note: Elizabeth is the blood apparent line of King Solomon, as we can see here by
the “God save; Long live” ceremony that was said for Solomon long ago.
This explains the end goal of all these societies to rebuild the Third Temple
After reestablishing their Kingdom of Jerusalem [Israel].)

And the Archbishop shall…

On the palms of both the hands, saying,
Be thy Hands anointed with holy Oil.

On the breast, saying,
Be thy Breast anointed with holy Oil.

On the crown of the head, saying,
Be thy Head anointed with holy Oil:
as kings, priests, and prophets were anointed:

And as Solomon was anointed king
by Zadok the priest and Nathan the prophet,
so be thou anointed, blessed, and consecrated Queen
over the Peoples, whom the Lord thy God
hath given thee to rule and govern,
In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. Amen.

Then shall the Dean of Westminster lay the Ampulla and Spoon upon the Altar;
and the Queen kneeling down at the faldstool, the Archbishop shall say this Blessing over her:

Our Lord Jesus Christ,
the Son of God,
who by his Father was anointed with the Oil of gladness
above his fellows,
by his holy Anointing pour down upon your Head and Heart
the blessing of the Holy Ghost,
and prosper the works of your Hands:
that by the assistance of his heavenly grace
you may govern and preserve
the Peoples committed to your charge
in wealth, peace, and godliness;
and after a long and glorious course
of ruling a temporal kingdom
wisely, justly, and religiously,
you may at last be made partaker of an eternal kingdom,
through the same Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.

See the full coronation ceremony (rite) as written,
here: http://www.oremus.org/liturgy/coronation/cor1953b.html

–=–

“The word ‘amen’ is from Ammon, the father god of Egypt,
and was an ancient Egyptian salutation to the supreme power of the universe”

–Manly P Hall, ‘How To Understand Your Bible’

–=–

“For all the promises of God in Him are yea,
and in Him Amen, unto the glory of God by us.”

–Corinthians 1:20, KJB

–=–

“To the angel of the Church in Laodicea write:
These are the words of the Amen, the faithful and true witness,
the ruler of God’s creation.”

–Revelation 3:14, KJB

–=–

“For I know that… a Hereditary Monarchy…
only exists with the support and consent of the people”

–Queen Elizabeth II, Nov. 20, 1997

–=–

Here, the queen is not simply stating the legal term implying that consent is required of the people for her Sovereignty. She is literally stating that only because the defeated and uneducated people allow this charade of unholy and unnatural government to continue, she and her blood and ilk will continue to rule the people solely because of their lack of resistance and lack of desire to live under God’s natural law. For she knows that control of true Christians under the false ritualized Christian Church and State is imperative to her family rule over all people. The Christian soldiers have lost their way…

–=–
And Now…
The Hereditary Sovereign U.S. Presidency
A Rite Consented To By The American People
–=–

In 1933, at the inception, deliberation, and creation of this official usurpation of the powers and authority of Congress over its Executive (Corporation Sole Roosevelt), Congressman James M. Beck spoke officially, stating (from the Congressional Record):

“I think of all the damnable heresies that have ever been suggested in connection with the Constitution, the doctrine of emergency is the worst. It means that when Congress declares an emergency, there is no Constitution. This means its death. It is the very doctrine that the German chancellor is invoking today in the dying hours of the parliamentary body of the German republic, namely, that because of an emergency, it should grant to the German chancellor absolute power to pass any law, even though the law contradicts the Constitution of the German republic. Chancellor Hitler is at least frank about it. We pay the Constitution lip-service, but the result is the same… the Constitution of the United States, as a restraining influence in keeping the federal government within the carefully prescribed channels of power, is moribund, if not dead. We are witnessing its death-agonies, for when this bill becomes a law, if unhappily it becomes a law, there is no longer any workable Constitution to keep the Congress within the limits of its Constitutional powers… This vast range of powers, taken together, confer enough authority to rule the country without reference to normal constitutional processes. Under the powers delegated by these statutes, the President may: seize property; organize and control the means of production; seize commodities, assign military forces abroad; institute martial law; seize and control all transportation and communication; regulate the operation of private enterprise; restrict travel; and, in a plethora of particular ways, control the lives of all American citizens.“

It is important to note that Congressman Beck resigned his seat from the Legislature one year later, in September of 1934, and was quoted as giving the reason for his resignation. He stated that Congress had become “merely a rubber stamp for the Executive.”

No truer words could have been said, in the past or in the present, and the cooperative efforts of Congress and the Executive have led America into the military rule (martial law of the Sovereign) we have today. For we are under several declared states of emergency as I write, whether re-declared or newly created by each new president.

If only the people of America would realize that they must resign their citizenship (membership) to the United States (corporation) if ever they wish to be free in America and in the world (nature) again…

Perhaps more to the point, the people of America would have to stop joining the United States military and recreate the lawful militia of each State in order to fight this invading U.S. army, or fight it themselves. The people of each state would need to forcibly drive out the United States military bases in each of their States to break that chain of control, which collectively represent the military occupation of each State according to the Lieber Code (see below) by this foreign United States corporation.

Ironically, this would require the teaching of this knowledge to the men and women who are employed as soldiers in that U.S. military, who have no idea that they are part of an invading military force in America and in their own hometowns… and have no idea that they are occupying the land of their parents and children. For the most important aspect of the power and authority of a military occupation is the manpower and manipulation of its military men, who learned patriotism and allegiance to the flag over the people in the very government schools they grew up in and from the movies and television their parents allowed them to watch. Without that violent military force, these lawmakers would have no power to enforce their sacred articles and uniform international codes, and those civil judges would have no force behind their overarching decisions.

This education of the military by the people and States they ignorantly occupy, in retrospect, should be at the forefront of our efforts to be a free people. For we are our own masters; our own brute force; our own violent tyrant. With knowledge and without our voluntary servitude, we would be free from each other and thus from the church and State.

As just one example, let’s look at the declaration of emergency declared by President George W. Bush after the events of September 11, 2001, remembering that all emergency declarations are designed to do one thing – gain more legal written Executive authority outside of the constitution and need for Congressional or the people’s approval. Since a national emergency may only be declared for a maximum time of one year, according to the National Emergencies Act of 1976 (50 US CODE, Section 1622-d as amended), both Bush, Obama, and any future president(s) must re-declare that emergency in continuance in order to keep the “special or extraordinary power” claimed by that Executive Order. In this case, think Patriot Act; warrant-less searches and seizures, indefinite detention without trial, rendition, and a whole host of unlawful military privileges that make all citizens “enemies of the State”.

Nine years after 9/11, President Obama declared a continuation of Bush’s original National Emergency, as posted on the Whitehouse.gov Federal website:

“Letter from the President on the Continuation of the National Emergency with Respect to Certain Terrorist Attacks”

September 10, 2010

Dear Madam Speaker:    (Dear Mr. President:)

Section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act, 50 U.S.C. 1622(d), provides for the automatic termination of a national emergency unless, prior to the anniversary date of its declaration, the President publishes in the Federal Register and transmits to the Congress a notice stating that the emergency is to continue in effect beyond the anniversary date. Consistent with this provision, I have sent to the Federal Register the enclosed notice, stating that the emergency declared with respect to the terrorist attacks on the United States of September 11, 2001, is to continue in effect for an additional year.

The terrorist threat that led to the declaration on September 14, 2001, of a national emergency continues. For this reason, I have determined that it is necessary to continue in effect after September 14, 2010, the national emergency with respect to the terrorist threat.

Sincerely,

BARACK OBAMA

Now remember, this is a declaration of war against the emergency. In this case, we see the undefined and useful words terrorist and terrorism being declared the enemy.

Here is what Obama stated in one of his speeches regarding this fictitious international foe with no name:

“Our nation is at war against a far reaching network of violence and hatred…”

You may not realize it, but this is actually a bold-faced lie. You see, no war has officially been declared according to any of the rules of war or to the congressional approval process. This is because the United States corporation (not America) is in a perpetual state of undeclared war… not against an enemy or another nation, but against a word or two in an emergency declaration’s doctrine and articles. In other words, this is not a war against some specific people or governemnt, but against a status assigned to anyone the Executive sees fit. Are you a terrorist? Is growing a vegetable garden a terrorist act? How can you know the answers if the terrorist list is secret in the presidents secret government via Executive Privilege and sacred articles of war?

More importantly, when it comes to nation building and the violent spread of U.S. influence and debt, the fact that no war has been officially declared by congress means that the rules of war do not apply. Geneva Conventions are not considered. Human rights violations are not bound in any way because war has not been lawfully declared since World War II. And this, unfortunately, includes the entire world’s people both at home and abroad, for the office of a sovereign dictator as Corporation Sole knows no law and recognizes no borders, thanks to “the People” of congress.

In 2011, one year later, Obama continued yet again the state of national emergency declaring a “war on terror“:

“The terrorist threat that led to the declaration on September 14, 2001, of a national emergency continues.  For this reason, I have determined that it is necessary to continue in effect after September 14, 2012, the national emergency with respect to the terrorist threat,”

–President Obama, September 11, 2011

For this to work – for the American people to accept this state of U.S. military rule of the world – the threat must be made to appear both external and internal. It must be invisible and yet visible in the news media, movies, and sitcoms (enter-tain-ment). And most horrifically, a show of blood and violence must be continuously exposed in ever more graphic detail to reinforce the illusion of an invisible and external threat.

For a much deeper understanding of this, please read my eye-opening essay about government sponsorship of its own terrorism against its own people from its own documentation, to promote fear in a war economy in times of peace (highly recommended):

(LINK–>https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2013/04/17/boston-bombing-the-importance-of-public-executions-in-peacetime/)

This continuous state of multiple declarations of national emergency was speculated upon long ago as the road to dictatorship and martial law in America, again reading from within the congressional record:

“The President has the power to seize property, organize and control the means of production, seize commodities, assign military forces abroad, call reserve forces amounting to 2 1/2 million men to duty, institute martial law, seize and control all means of transportation, regulate all private enterprise, restrict travel, and in a plethora of particular ways, control the lives of all Americans…

Most [of these laws] remain a potential source of virtually unlimited power for a President should he choose to activate them. It is possible that some future President could exercise this vast authority in an attempt to place the United States under authoritarian rule.

While the danger of a dictatorship arising through legal means may seem remote to us today (in 1973), recent history records Hitler seizing control through the use of the emergency powers provisions contained in the laws of the Weimar Republic.”

–Joint Statement, Senators Frank Church (D-ID) and Charles McMathias (R-MD) September 30, 1973.

–=–

Indeed, this doctrine of emergency can certainly be seen throughout history, where it was utilized for total control and power. For the origins of a “constitutional dictatorship” date back to the Roman law in that old Republic. And of course in rome the constitution and the rights of the people could also be temporarily suspended in wartime.

In France, the constitution was suspended under the declared “State of Siege”.

In Great Britain, the “Defense of the Realm Acts” allow that monarchy to suspend its subjects rights.

And in Germany, as mentioned above, Hitler certainly became a constitutional dictator when “Article 48” was invoked.

Here in the United States, we call it the “War Powers”. And those include the state of war on the declared national emergency.

(See the “War Powers Act” by author Eugene Schroeder and various other authors and researchers for an intimate walkthrough of how all of this happened, pre-dating Roosevelt and creating first all persons (citizens and non-citizens) as “enemies of the State”.

Bouvier’s Law Dictionary describes perfectly what we the common people really are:

CHATTELS – property. A term which includes all kinds of property, except the freehold or things which are parcel of it. It is a more extensive term than goods or effects. Debtors taken in execution, captives, apprentices, are accounted chattels.

And again, who are the Debtors?

CONSTITUTOR – civil law. He who promised by a simple pact to pay the debt of another; and this is always a principal obligation.

For most Americans who are helplessly devoted to the idea of citizenship to the United States (constitutors), the thought that for their entire lives they have been under a military occupation without knowing it is offensive and even… yeah, you guessed it… SACRILEGE. For we are actually speaking of belief in the totally misunderstood American concepts of freedom, rights, and the constitution. And belief is the most powerful tool a government has in its mind control and enter-tain-ment of the people. For with belief comes hope – hope that things will get better if only the constitution was here – the great American fallacy.

Ironically, the proof is in the pudding. You see, the ability and power to declare martial law is in fact a sign that you already live under it! Martial law in peacetime is called military rule. In other words, if the president can declare martial law at any time as Commander in Chief of the military and national guard, this power can only be declared because military rule is already in place (see Liebor Code below).

Such simple and easy to understand logic trumped by ignorance and the arrogance of patriotism!

Without a military able to be called under one ruler (sovereign), there can be no martial law. Remember, law requires enforcement! And as long as the people cooperate with the President (government), the physical manifestation of the already existing president’s military rule will not be implemented as martial law – the violent enforcement of the sovereign.

As we read through a few of the sacred articles of the Lieber Code, the first thing we see is that a military base in each state (all 50 republics) represents most certainly the military rule of the United States as a “hostile army”. The problem lies in slapping people hard enough to make them realize that their military is indeed a hostile force that long ago invaded their State, not a protective force. For the military (army) protects the United States and its continuity, not the people for which that central government named as “enemies of the State”. No army is needed in times of peace, and yet there they are, occupying all States in the land of America (the spiritual jurisdiction of the United States as a spiritual corporation). Of course civilians are off limits in military bases. The military’s operations and records are secret and withheld from the people. The military is used to quell unrest in the streets of America (the military jurisdiction of the United States). And yet the people don’t believe they live in an occupied territory (States are merely Federal territories/possessions incorporated as political bodies or “States”).

My people truly are perishing because of their lack of knowledge…

Just what are the rules of the victors and the spoils of war?

The Lieber Code, which is recognized internationally as the Instructions for the Government of Armies of the United States in the Field, or “General Orders 100” as signed by the president Abraham Lincoln as he invaded his own nation during the War of Northern Aggression (Civil War), states within its sacred articles that:

Article 1. A place, district, or country occupied by an enemy stands, in consequence of the occupation, under the Martial Law of the invading or occupying army, whether any proclamation declaring Martial Law, or any public warning to the inhabitants, has been issued or not. Martial Law is the immediate and direct effect and consequence of occupation or conquest.

The presence of a hostile army proclaims its Martial Law.

Article 2. Martial Law does not cease during the hostile occupation, except by special proclamation, ordered by the commander in chief; or by special mention in the treaty of peace concluding the war, when the occupation of a place or territory continues beyond the conclusion of peace as one of the conditions of the same.

(Note that no treaty or proclaimation has ever been issued ending both Lincolns and all other wars and occupations. In other words, peace has never been declared in America under the United States government.)

Article 3. Martial Law in a hostile country consists in the suspension, by the occupying military authority, of the criminal and civil law, and of the domestic administration and government in the occupied place or territory, and in the substitution of military rule and force for the same, as well as in the dictation of general laws, as far as military necessity requires this suspension, substitution, or dictation.

The commander of the forces may proclaim that the administration of all civil and penal law shall continue either wholly or in part, as in times of peace, unless otherwise ordered by the military authority.

Article 4. Martial Law is simply military authority exercised in accordance with the laws and usages of war. Military oppression is not Martial Law: it is the abuse of the power which that law confers. As Martial Law is executed by military force, it is incumbent upon those who administer it to be strictly guided by the principles of justice, honor, and humanity – virtues adorning a soldier even more than other men, for the very reason that he possesses the power of his arms against the unarmed.

(Note that Justice, Honor, and Humanity are Masonic principles.)

Article 5. Martial Law should be less stringent in places and countries fully occupied and fairly conquered. Much greater severity may be exercised in places or regions where actual hostilities exist, or are expected and must be prepared for. Its most complete sway is allowed – even in the commander’s own country – when face to face with the enemy, because of the absolute necessities of the case, and of the paramount duty to defend the country against invasion.

To save the country (continuity of corporate government) is paramount to all other considerations.

(Remember, the country is government, not the people under it. They are the enemy.)

Article 6. All civil and penal law shall continue to take its usual course in the enemy’s places and territories under Martial Law, unless interrupted or stopped by order of the occupying military power; but all the functions of the hostile government – legislative, executive, or administrative – whether of a general, provincial, or local character, cease under Martial Law, or continue only with the sanction, or, if deemed necessary, the participation of the occupier or invader.

(Here we see that our form of law appears the same under military rule, and violent martial law will not be implemented unless the civil law stops quelling the enemy (people) into submission.)

Article 7. Martial Law extends to property, and to persons, whether they are subjects of the enemy or aliens to that government…

Article 10. Martial Law affects chiefly the police and collection of public revenue and taxes, whether imposed by the expelled government or by the invader, and refers mainly to the support and efficiency of the army, its safety, and the safety of its operations…

(Here again we see why the education of the men and women in the Army (military) and police, in order to place honorable men there who will not enforce unlawful requests or laws of government, is paramount to ending this unlawful occupation of the Untied States. For the government needs force to apply its sovereign rule. Without it, the emperor would wear no cloths. This means that government would loose its incorporation as authority to rule. And of course this hilariously states that the people will be taxed to support their own people who act as soldiers in the army that is invading them… talk about self-imposed slavery!)

Article 12. Whenever feasible, Martial Law is carried out in cases of individual offenders by Military Courts; but sentences of death shall be executed only with the approval of the chief executive, provided the urgency of the case does not require a speedier execution, and then only with the approval of the chief commander.

Article 13. Military jurisdiction is of two kinds: First, that which is conferred and defined by statute; second, that which is derived from the common law of war. Military offenses under the statute law must be tried in the manner therein directed; but military offenses which do not come within the statute must be tried and punished under the common law of war. The character of the courts which exercise these jurisdictions depends upon the local laws of each particular country.

In the armies of the United States the first is exercised by courts-martial, while cases which do not come within the “Rules and Articles of War,” or the jurisdiction conferred by statute on courts-martial, are tried by military commissions.

(As discussed earlier, our soldiers and police take the oath to the president and to government and the constitution (which just happens to be “constitutionally” suspended), and not to the people and their protection. They follow the Sacred oath in their articles of war, which confer the jurisdiction of “god” through government and its sacramentum. All courts are military courts, even the civil courts, where judges and BAR members also take a similar oath not to the people in any way. The oath to the constitution and upholding it is not an oath to the people or to uphold ourselves. We know courts are military under this “Code” and simply by analyzing the force of law they subject the individual people to through the executive police and military forces. And we know know that civil law is a militarily enforced statutory code.)

Article 14. Military necessity, as understood by modern civilized nations, consists in the necessity of those measures which are indispensable for securing the ends of the war, and which are lawful according to the modern law and usages of war.

(Note here that the Presidential Executive declarations of emergency are also claimed to be a necessity, and are obviously enforced violently through military rule. And the emergency isn’t undeclared until its end (goal) is secured – securing the end of the war against the emergency.)

Article 15. Military necessity admits of all direct destruction of life or limb of armed enemies, and of other persons whose destruction is incidentally unavoidable (collateral damage) in the armed contests of the war; it allows of the capturing of every armed enemy, and every enemy of importance to the hostile government, or of peculiar danger to the captor; it allows of all destruction of property, and obstruction of the ways and channels of traffic, travel, or communication, and of all withholding of sustenance or means of life from the enemy; of the appropriation of whatever an enemy’s country affords necessary for the subsistence and safety of the army, and of such deception as does not involve the breaking of good faith either positively pledged, regarding agreements entered into during the war, or supposed by the modern law of war to exist. Men who take up arms against one another in public war do not cease on this account to be moral beings, responsible to one another and to God.

(As we read above, the president through emergency powers, Presidential Directives, and Executive Orders has clearly made Article 15 a reality. The term “enemy combatants” and “terrorists” are not just terms used for foreigners. To the United States corporation, all citizens of the United States are chattel and foreigners; literally and legally referred to as “enemies of the State” by U.S. Code under the “Trading With The Enemies Act”.)

Article 16. Military necessity does not admit of cruelty – that is, the infliction of suffering for the sake of suffering or for revenge, nor of maiming or wounding except in fight, nor of torture to extort confessions. It does not admit of the use of poison in any way, nor of the wanton devastation of a district. It admits of deception, but disclaims acts of perfidy; and, in general, military necessity does not include any act of hostility which makes the return to peace unnecessarily difficult.

(We, of course, live under the most deceptive legal system ever devised, utilizing elicit word magic and trickery, as permitted by the conquering military power of the United States and administered by the International Bar Association under the Executive Department of “Justice”. Again here we see a necessity established for justification of cruelty in fight. And the courts will decide what that means!)

Article 17. War is not carried on by arms alone. It is lawful to starve the hostile belligerent, armed or unarmed, so that it leads to the speedier subjection of the enemy.

(The starvation of white German soldiers and farmers after World War 2 killed vast amounts of men, women, and children after the war, as the U.S. and other Allied troops guarded and purposefully starved the innocent white Germanic peoples. Germany too, as well as Japan, is and has been under military rule since that second war. Keep in mind that under Executive Order, the president and his Cabinet have complete control over the production, manufacture, and distribution of food. Does starving you, your family, or your town or State really sound like a ridiculous concept right now? Well then, let’s read Article 18…)

Article 18. When a commander of a besieged place expels the noncombatants, in order to lessen the number of those who consume his stock of provisions, it is lawful, though an extreme measure, to drive them back, so as to hasten on the surrender.

(Here we only need to remember the fictions like “Brave New World” or the upcoming movie “Elysium”, where the poor common trash is held back and outside of the kingdom so as to protect the military enforced government and its city of cooperative slaves and elites and its commodity supply. Alphas, Betas, Deltas, Gammas, etc… those who will and will not bio-metrically take the Mark of the government Beast.)

Article 19. Commanders, whenever admissible, inform the enemy of their intention to bombard a place, so that the noncombatants, and especially the women and children, may be removed before the bombardment commences. But it is no infraction of the common law of war to omit thus to inform the enemy. Surprise may be a necessity…

(The Biological Weapons Program of the United States requires informed consent of the people and a journal entry in order for the United States to test biological weapons on the people. Of course, this is done covertly – for the people would absolutely never really allow themselves to be tested upon in such a way by their own permission. Whenever we hear of ATF raids like the Branch Davidions in Waco, Tx, we must realize that this is the hostile military of the United States (Washington D.C.) utilizing Article 19 as the necessity to kill innocent Americans; be they U.S. citizens or not, and including women and children. And heck, it makes for great enter-tain-ment on the TV to promote the need for the ATF and military!)

While we will not include the entire Code here, Section II reenforces the fact that in the United States’, its opinion of what constitutes the spoils of war, all property and corporate fiction persons belong to the occupying force of government – used as the god trust we discussed earlier…

SECTION II Public and private property of the enemy – Protection of persons, and especially of women, of religion, the arts and sciences – Punishment of crimes against the inhabitants of hostile countries.

Article 31. A victorious army appropriates all public money, seizes all public movable property until further direction by its government, and sequesters for its own benefit or of that of its government all the revenues of real property belonging to the hostile government or nation. The title to such real property remains in abeyance during military occupation, and until the conquest is made complete.

(Keep in mind that “public money” was gold and silver, otherwise known as “lawful money” back then. It still amazes me that when the occupying United States government forcibly confiscated under martial law all of the gold in America, that the people right then didn’t figure out that they were at war with their own government, or at least that their perception of their constitution and their free country was a lie. And for that matter, why hasn’t anyone figured this out till now??? Why do people still claim we live in a free country when our own government and banking history completely obliterates that belief?)

Article 32. A victorious army, by the martial power inherent in the same, may suspend, change, or abolish, as far as the martial power extends, the relations which arise from the services due, according to the existing laws of the invaded country, from one citizen, subject, or native of the same to another.

The commander of the army must leave it to the ultimate treaty of peace to settle the permanency of this change.

(So next time you find yourself complaining that government isn’t doing the job you elected it for, first remember that you didn’t elect your Federal Government in any way – you silly voter. Second, remember that the cancelling or suspension of taxpayer services is a sovereign right of that Electoral College-elected and Presidential appointed government under military rule by the Lieber Code. Thirdly, remember that taxpayer services are not the right of the people, but are privileges granted by the occupying government that is allowing you to live under its civil law until you wake up and see what martial law really looks, feels, and tastes like.)

You may read the entire Lieber Code and its history, as well as verify that it is still in effect, at these links:

http://www.civilwarhome.com/liebercode.htm

http://weroar.ws/files/docs/TheCivilWarWithNoEnding.pdf

https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2012/07/04/why-the-supreme-court-claims-obamacare-is-constitutional/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lieber_Code

http://www.liebercode.org/

–=–

In modern times, where up is down and left is right, the Lieber Code
has been mutated and re-imagined into current standards of
Jewish/Masonic “protocols”, articles, and codes. The use of unmanned
drones, says Mrs. Finkelstein, are perfectly moral in such an
Asymmetrical world of oppressive law where collateral damage
includes mothers… and especially little children.

–=–

“War is peace.”

–George Orwell–

–=–

Similar declared national emergencies are also in a state of yearly perpetual continuance via Executive Order, granting other extraordinary powers to the President with absolutely no real official objections from Congress. Here in this video, we see the re-declaration being read into the Federal Register in Congress, as required by Congress:

Note that this man is not the asking for permission from congress. This is the actual informing of congress of something that already was approved by the president without congress, and thus gaining the “informed consent” of the “people” while legally fulfilling Congress’ requirement to comlete the entry of the emergency into the Federal Register.

You see, congress made this little legislative law that all but stripped itself of its own powers to stop such whims of the president by declaring, in the Act of March 9, 1933, Title 1, Section 1:

“The actions, regulations, rules, licenses, orders and proclamations heretofore or hereafter taken, promulgated, made or issued by the President of the United States or the Secretary of the Treasury since March the 4th, 1933, pursuant to the authority conferred by subdivision (b) of Section 5 of the Act of October 6, 1917, as amended, are hereby approved and confirmed.”

It was thus altered to this:

“The actions, regulations, rules, licenses, orders and proclamations heretofore or hereafter taken, promulgated, made or issued by the President of the United States or the Secretary of the Treasury since March the 4th, 1933, pursuant to the amended [12 USC Sec. 95a], are hereby approved and confirmed. (Mar. 9, 1933, c. 1, Title 1, Sec. 1, 48 Stat, 1.)”

And today it can be found in the U.S. Code as Title 12 Subsection 95(b), here: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/12/95b

It is also used in Title 50, entitled “War And National Defense”.

These Executive “Orders” as stated above are approved before they are even known by congress or read into the record, for congress already gave their blessing for approval before President Obama was even born. Please understand that this section of U.S. Code has not been removed (voted away) by congress in the 80 years since it was created by them. This shows the cooperation of Congress with the Executive, especially within the government Federal Reserve banking scheme. For congress knows that all of the unlawful acts of the Executive and that central bank that Congress created would not be possible without the President’s war and emergency powers. The enforcer must be free to enforce without hindrance. Yet the illusion of “checks and balances” and adversarial proceedings between the Branches and Houses continues for the benefit of the people in media, who still believe in the constitution and its power to limit the president of that corporate United States. That’s silly of course, because the constitution is not alive. Only congress can take such an action, and only against itself! The paper is worthless without honorable men running the show.

Always remember, the Executive Branch is the enforcement arm of the law. So when the enforcers of law become the makers of the laws they enforce with no one to challenge them, the worst fears of Congressman James Beck and others as read in the congressional record above can certainly be said to have already been trumped.

–=–

President John F. Kennedy declared Executive Order 10995 in the year 1962. Today, that Executive Order has been tweaked, manipulated, and re-declared each year by each new president into what it is today.

And then there is the continuation by Barack Obama of a more than 20 year old emergency, of which “notice” was given on the Federal Whitehouse.gov website as follows:

NOTICE

– – – – – – –

CONTINUATION OF THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY WITH RESPECT TO

WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION

On November 14, 1994, by Executive Order 12938, the President declared a national emergency with respect to the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States posed by the proliferation of nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons (weapons of mass destruction) and the means of delivering such weapons. On July 28, 1998, the President issued Executive Order 13094 amending Executive Order 12938 to respond more effectively to the worldwide threat of weapons of mass destruction proliferation activities. On June 28, 2005, the President issued Executive Order 13382 which, inter alia, further amended Executive Order 12938 to improve our ability to combat proliferation. The proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them continues to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States; therefore, the national emergency first declared on November 14, 1994, and extended in each subsequent year, must continue. In accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency declared in Executive Order 12938, as amended.

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to the Congress.

–BARACK OBAMA

–=–

In 2009, Time Magazine reported:

“President Obama’s Oct. 24 decision to officially declare the H1N1 swine-flu virus a national emergency came with a speedy caveat: Don’t panic. The declaration was just a formality, the White House explained, a way to allow hospitals to circumvent unnecessary restrictions in order to bring about quicker, more effective swine-flu treatment.”

In other words, it allowed corporations to CIRCUMVENT THE LAW AND NATURAL HUMAN RIGHTS!

Don’t be fooled! Belittling the importance of what a declared state of emergency actually creates – military rule/martial law – is a classic tactic by government and the media to hide the significance of the fact that each President is in reality a legal dictator with an entire military and congress (representatives of “the people’) backing his every whim.

In another state of emergency originally declared by president Jimmy Carter on November 14, 1979 during the “Iranian Hostage Crisis”, we see a continuation with every president since, having been continuously renewed for now over thirty-four years, most recently by Barack Obama in November of 2012 continuing into 2013.

Of course the Iranian hostage situation is long over…

But it is the set of extraordinary powers and outrageous authorities conveyed in these emergency declarations that keeps them alive and re-declared, not the actual emergency itself.

And so as we delve further into this understanding of what government actually is, its origins in Masonry as a Deist theocratic nation and not a Christian one, and the contractual relationship we all play as “residents” and “citizens”, we must continuously strive not to forget the military nature of the enforcement of this Masonic theocracy and its laws under the Marshals of law (martial law) that has extended not only from 1933, but since the end of the Civil War. And let’s face it, the massacring of tribes and peoples throughout history by the military forces of the Church and State has always been declared to be necessary as a holy mission to protect God’s kingdom of government on earth as ruled by the bloodline Monarchs and presidents.

–=–
Fin
–=–

This brings us to the end of Part I of this “Cracking The Cult Of The Constitution” series.

But before we go, let’s have a look at that definition of religion again:

Religion:

“Man’s relation to Divinity, to reverence, worship, obedience, and submission to mandates and precepts of supernatural or superior beings. In its broadest sense includes all forms of belief in the existence of superior beings exercising power over human beings by volition, imposing rules of conduct, with future rewards and punishments. Bond uniting man to GOD, and a virtue whose purpose is to render GOD worship due him as source of all being and principle of all government of things“

–Black’s Law: 5th Edition

Do these precepts start to make sense now? Do you understand the theocracy that is the U.S. govern-ment? And do you now understand that “Man’s relation to Divinity” is, according to the church, his relation to government?

The culmination of the above research pales in comparison with what I have to show you next. And I know that at this point you will certainly have at least a few unanswered questions that will certainly be answered in parts two and three. For as we delve into the true history of the founding of this country; utilizing such tools as the Masonic Bible, the personal writings of the Masonic founders and presidents, a vast pictorial archive, and other inconvenient facts from our hidden history, all of your questions and doubts will be hopefully be satisfied.

I thank you for making it this far, and will be posting part two as soon as I can make it available. Already it has blown my mind with just the 100’s of images I’ve collected.

Until we meet again…

–=–
End Part I
–=–

Part 2: (link)
https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2013/08/13/cracking-the-cult-of-the-constitution-part-ii/

.

–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Monday, August 5th, 2013