Sand Wars: True Crimes Against Nature


I don’t say this often, but stop! Watch this documentary. Do nothing else today if not this. Your livelihood and possibly your life may depend on it. For what you are about to see is the most important documentary ever made. As a documentary filmmaker myself, this is no small praise.

But what you are also about to see is the most shocking display of human arrogance and greed I have ever been made to witness, the consequences of which are being felt as we speak. To call this a crime against nature is not even a fair statement, for man has finally found a way to subvert the very harmony and foundational structure of the Earth that supports us. And so when I say to you that beaches everywhere on Earth are disappearing into the ocean, and that islands are “sinking” as they also recede into that watery oblivion, you better damn well pay attention to this.

However, what is most astounding about this film is what is not said. So many pieces of the “conspiracy” puzzle are filled in by this film that I doubt it would have been allowed to air if these obvious conclusions were pointed out within, from geo-Engineering the land and sea to the official story of climate change and supposedly rising oceans. This film shows us what no one else could, by showing us not the conclusions but the causes of so much corruption.

Now, before we go on, and since my following discourse here will not make sense otherwise, please, please, watch this documentary film NOW!

–=–

Link–> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nu6zLNpGUG0

–=–

Note: The Youtube title attributed to this film is “Flat Earth…” Please do not let this distract you, for this video is nothing but the movie in question called “Sand Wars.” To their credit, the poster of this video also comprehends that this is the key to understanding the official story about “climate change” and how it is being used as a smokescreen to hide this “sand war.”

–=–

At this point, I’d like to talk about this film and what it says, but more so what it does not say outrightly. For whatever you are feeling right now, prepare to be a lot more angry after the following is presented.

Let’s take these one at a time…

–=–
Soylent Blue:
Dredging Life, Recreating Sand.

–=–

As this movie presents with stunning clarity and evidence, this neo-facist corporate structure and the governments that support it have declared war on the sea floor. By dredging for sand, that is, by virtually sucking up in a vacuum everything sitting upon the ocean floor, everything on that underwater beach is rendered dead. Life forms from crabs to coral are being gobbled up and crushed into micro-pieces of their former existence, and so literally are being turned into “sand.” This is also taking place on rivers and lakes, and in the Great Lakes.

To be clear, a Live Science article explains the origin of much of the ocean sand:

“Tropical islands, such as the Hawaiian Islands, don’t have a rich source of quartz, so the sand is different in those locations. The beach sand on tropical islands often looks white because it is made up of calcium carbonate, which comes from the shells and skeletons of reef-living marine organisms, including corals, mollusks and microorganisms called foraminifera.

Sand  forms when the reef breaks down, either by mechanical forces — such as waves and currents — or from bio-erosion caused by grazing fish, urchins and other marine life. The famous pink sand of Bermuda is also composed of eroded calcium carbonate; the sand gets its ruddy hue from the abundant red foraminifera, Homotrema rubrum.

“Tropical beaches may also have black sand, which is composed of black volcanic glass. Sometimes, erosive forces separate the mineral olivine from other volcanic fragments, leading to green sand beaches, such as Hawaii’s Papakōlea Beach…”

Link–> http://www.livescience.com/34748-what-is-sand-beach-sand.html#sthash.yE08Wfyy.dpuf

–=–

As revealed in the movie, sand takes many centuries to break down, form, and finally deposit itself so as to become a life-sustaining environment for other ocean life. But what if you could simply put it all into a blender and create your own margarita of ocean death, a commodity that you simply title as “sand” and sell it on the black market, with government approval of course?

You’d be creating the new Soylent Green, only in this case it’s the ocean’s Soylent Blue.

Now, I’m sure most of my readers have heard of the terrible death of the coral reefs in the oceans, as reported by so many sources. We are told that the cause of this kill-off (die-off) of ocean life is due to everything from Fukushima radiation to warming ocean temperatures. And yet no one is talking about Soylent Blue. No one is speaking to the fact that at any moment massive drudging tankers are scouring the ocean floor trying to vacuum up every living and non-living thing that can be mutilated and turned into sand. After all, bones and shells are made of calcium. After a while, whatever biological material that once made up the essence of life will fade away, leaving only the trace elements necessary to make sand.

So what is killing off coral reefs and ocean life? Did you happen to catch the clip in this movie about the Maldives where they admitted to dredging coral reef to specifically crush it into sand?

Isn’t it suddenly, clearly obvious why the ocean reefs and life is dying?

Can we sink any lower in our collective moral degradation?

While this fact alone should be enough to cause a standing war against every government and corporation that even thinks about harvesting sand to build empty cities while the price is still cheap for sand, I fear even this most horrific destruction of our finite biosphere is still not enough to cause true action against such crimes against nature. Silence is the worst trait of a well-conditioned society, one primed to look the other way towards the benefits of such crimes, not the problems. And honestly, if this doesn’t cause a revolt and a revolution, nothing will.

–=–
Ghost Cities
–=–

What can I say but mystery solved. I need not comment much on this subject but to say that while 100’s of millions of common people live in shanties and slums, massive amounts of sand and other material resources are being turned into massive multi-dwelling apartment complexes and then kept purposefully empty until a point in time where building costs will skyrocket due to the worldwide shortage of properly, naturally formed sand. Then and only then will the supporting governments of these projects begin selling these sardine-like abodes. This isn’t government, this is organized crime, as displayed in the movie.

And so we see here that the greed of these corporate sycophants (self-seeking, servile flatterers; fawning parasites) are able to exist and continue building empty empires only through government support of such profit-making schemes, while at the same time its people are starving, many due to their ocean fishing habitats being destroyed by sand dredging and mining.

At the very least, we can now put all the theories aside and be assured that these ghost cities in China and elsewhere are being built purely out of greed and corruption, and because the current sand wars and future scarcity of this non-renewable material of life demand it.

But it get’s worse, for even the victims of this disgusting, legally licensed and black market business venture are being paid to harm themselves. So desperate have the poor been made in their seeking of income that they are willingly stealing their own supporting sand structure right out from under their own beaches. Literally, their own homes are losing their sandy resting places.

And this leads us into the ultimate propagandist media lie…

–=–
Rising Oceans, Or Receding Beaches?
–=–

How often do we hear that, due to “man-made global warming,” the oceans are in the slow process of rising enough to destroy many cities and coastline infrastructures around the world? Were we right to be skeptical? Were we right not to accept the “consensus” of lobbied and paid-for scientists working for the same governments that are pounding the sand wars?

You bet ya.

As this movie documents, it is not the oceans that are rising, it is that up to 90% of our beaches are collapsing back into the oceans, giving the appearance that the water levels are rising. And as homes are swallowed up by the sea, even while the sandy foundations have obviously receded, we are still being told that we are the cause of these disappearing beaches, islands, and beach-front cities.

And so we find that this whole global warming hoax has been designed to cover-up these sand wars and their effects upon all the land, even as dredging operations sponsored by those same propagandists literally destroy the coastlines and maritime boundaries of the entire world.

I remember when George Carlin comedically insisted that man was not and would never be a significant enough presence on earth to change it, that the whole save the earth campaign was a foolish profit scheme and that the earth wasn’t in need of being saved from us. Well, it appears that man has found a way to cause even George to roll over in his grave. And if he saw this movie, he would no doubt agree that the time for jokes and holding up signs is over. He would say its time to forcibly remove those “owners” of us now, that its time to destroy their “club” that “we ain’t in.”

It was a profitable crime scheme, and it worked. But now we can see the fruition of their business ventures, even as they hoard what little viable sand remains.

–=–
The Recycling Lie
–=–

Kudos to the filmmaker for attempting to stay in the lines of the typical problem, reaction, solution model of most documentary films. But I must declare here that the solution of recycling glass into sand and then using that sand in an non-recyclable construction project is basically a non-starter. The rest of this film is so reasonable, and so my critique here is only a protest to the unreasonableness of this so-called “solution.”

As the film states, once sand is used in reinforced concrete, it cannot be reused for any other purpose. And so we find that while sand is turned into glass, the notion of turning glass back into sand seems to make sense on the face of it. But the reality of this recycling scheme is akin to feeling good about being a canniblist while at the same time realizing that soon all eatable people will be consumed and thus no viable food will be left to canniblize.

One can only rape and pillage nature as long as there is something to take.

The point is that there is very little difference between using glass as reclaimed sand and just using sand. There is merely a middle step in between the taking and the using of the sand, where for a brief moment that sand was used as someones bottle or glass. But “recycling” that glass back into “recycled,” or perhaps “un-cycled” sand and then using it for a building material is hardly any more “sustainable” (their favorite catchphrase) than just harvesting it directly. This solution is ridiculous. And this is my only critique of an otherwise brilliant movie. For even the best of us can be made to fall for the Hegelian Dialectic, when the only real and true course of action available is to stop using what we cannot replace.

I’ve always known recycling was merely another government sponsored material resource scheme, and we can certainly see why.

–=–
Corexit: Sand To Oil And Back Again?
–=–

The oil industry is now happily creating technologies to “turn sand into oil.” While this is not quite an accurate description, the corruption of the foundation of our environment is the same, causing sinkholes and structural degradation as the sand is disrupted from its natural course and settlement in a multi century journey.

In the above article on what is sand, we find that sand is also formed by what is known as “bio-erosion.” Funny, but that sounds a bit like what Corexit does. And so I had this horrible thought that maybe, just maybe, this stuff is designed to bio-erode the coral reefs of the gulf, or even to turn oil into some form or component of future sand or into tar sands to harvest!

Scientific American reports:

“FORT MCMURRAY, Alberta—Where does the U.S. get the bulk of the imported petroleum to support its oil addiction? Contrary to popular belief, it’s not Saudi Arabia—it’s Canada, which supplies the U.S. with more than two million barrels of oil per day, or more than a quarter of all its imported oil. And more than half of that output comes from bitumen melted out of the buried sands of northeastern Alberta—a sprawling deposit of extra-heavy oil underlying more than 142,000 square kilometers, or an area roughly the size of Florida.

“This Canadian province—only slightly smaller than Texas—exported more than $52 billion worth of crude oil in 2011 because it’s “one of the few places in the world where you can actually mine oil,” notes Cameron Brown, director of advocacy at the Alberta Ministry of International and Intergovernmental Relations.”

Link–> http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-to-turn-tar-sands-into-oil-slideshow/

–=–

The amount of water used for this process is a whole other subject, as dwindling reservoirs are blamed on thirsty consumers even as oil companies like pirate ships loot those secondary reserves. An amazing amount of towns have died as their reservoirs dry up or are polluted due to these types of mining operation. And of course, the sand of those abandoned buildings, including that which was used in the damn to create that reservoir in the first place, is trapped permanently in time like a fossil record of man’s stupidity.

But as I was watching this movie, a friend and I got to discussing the Gulf Oil “spill” and how live video showed massive amounts of Corexit being pumped into and combined at the source of the possibly purposeful oil leak. As the oil flowed, so too did 1.84 million gallons of Corexit EC9500A and Corexit EC9527A. And so I got to thinking about this. And though I came to no concrete (pun intended) answer, I have the sneaking suspicion that this was somehow connected to the sand wars. What exactly happens to that oil, and what does it turn into once combined and compounded with this horrific chemical? Does it create future tar sands? Does it help to make sand? Was this some sort of really immoral reclamation project as the sands of the gulf are being harvested?

I have not had time to research this angle fully, but I can’t shake the feeling that this has something to do with this sand war. Perhaps my readers may shed some light on this particular connection. For, according to reports, Corexit was just about the worst possible choice of solutions for that situation, unless the goal was to get the Corexit into the ocean legally by causing an oil leak. Food for thought…

–=–
Victims Of The Sand Wars: Climate Refugees
–=–

The notion that the poorest of people being effected by this corporate boondoggle of our world are being called as “climate refugees” is perhaps the most reprehensible propaganda we have all been fed. While we are told to open our hearts and our borders to so many victims of “climate change,” another favorite, undefined catchphrase that ultimately has no set meaning, kinda like the fallacies of  “terrorists” and “hate groups,” we can now see that these people are seeking refuge only because their governments sold out their lands, and more specifically their sands.

And governments with open arms and force are requiring this multiculturalist phenomenon to happen. After all, with every refugee the government can sponsor more construction, and with more construction comes more sand production. And with more sand production, scarcity abounds and profits soar.

But we must here and now, before its too late, realize that we are all in the process of becoming climate refugees. It is not merely these foreign peoples lands that are being ruined, it is the entire planet’s. For if we do not protect what is all of ours mutually, and instead if we allow these few corporate and governmental agents to take what is our very life force and inheritance of Nature with permissive license and utter silence and inaction in their wake, then we deserve the very real dystopia we will allow to be built out of this once harmonious biosphere.

We are at a threshold. If this is not stopped, and violently so, we will be depopulating ourselves. We will be the cause of more construction to rebuild the old. We will do what I always thought was impossible, we will alter the surface of the Earth to the point where most of our cities will be under water, and all that sand used in the construction of those cities will long and year to be reconnected with that which surrounds it, stuck in a form that is completely un-conducive to the life cycle it was once a part of.

I am truly humbled and amazed that this war of resources has been happening without even a pop on my radar. It seems almost too bizarre to be true. And yet I have never witnessed anything so Real in my life. I hope this movie has the same effect on you, and that you won’t be merely a forgetful hearer of these words. We must be change or we will be changed. And writing your corrupt congressmen, the very lawmakers that make all of this organized crime happen, is not going to change a damn thing. This behavior of trust in lies and liars must change as well, the foolish belief that the cause is also the cure.

We are all victims of this. There is not one of us that is an exception to this rule, even those making huge profits from this crime against nature. We cannot point to others as the victims or the problem, for the problem is each of us and our wants and desires. We cannot continue to play these devil’s advocates.

–=–
Dams And Other Geo-Engineering
–=–

In this movie we see what are referred to (titles as) “Coastal Engineers,” which is another term for geo-engineer. As I was shocked to discover in a previous research trail, geo-engineering is a sought after degree in many of the worlds most prestigious colleges and universities. Be it the altering of the natural sky, land, or sea, this term geo-engineering is the total education package of the psychopathy of arrogance involved in mitigating man’s ignorance of the harmony and Laws of Nature. All degrees are sought after so as to gain permission and licensure for different government-regulated job titles. Geo-engineering, in whatever form and title, is vastly becoming a needed workforce for the meddling of governments and sponsored corporations around the world, and especially in sand-rape mitigation. Whether it is building a dam, constructing a dyke, or sucking up sand to move it to another site, these geo-engineers or “climate mitigators” are becoming a new age corp of engineers.

But I remind you that this is not a climate issue, that this is an out-of-control black market issue, that this is a governance issue, and that this is a profits over nurture issue.

Never realizing or purposefully ignoring the problem, our governmental strategy has been directed full force into the reactive mode, in a pure symptom relief without cure of all the damage it and its licensed corporations are causing in the name of pointless expansion and growth. For without such growth, most of government’s pointless bureaucracy would be unneeded, that is, if government was actually only there to preserve what is necessary and right for our harmonious existence in Nature under Nature’s Laws and not to buy and use up all the resources it can in the name of the fictional economy of its own currencies.

Don’t believe in chemtrails or Geo-engineering? Well it believes in you, and wants you to get a degree in it. If you haven’t read my research into this college degree program in geo-engineering, you had better quickly realize that these aren’t degrees in fiction:

Link–> https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2014/05/11/degrees-in-geo-engineering-and-sustainable-development/

And so as we tear apart the very fabric and structure of sand that supports our coastal megalopolises, it is no doubt that more insane geo-engineering agents will be needed to mitigate the total arrogance of man’s corporate adventures into madness. This is not teaching our children well…

–=–
Why Dolphins Die And Birds Fall Out Of The Sky
–=–

As a final plea to the sanity of my people, I wanted to leave you with this. For to depend on government for abatement and remedy of this problem will be our downfall. To understand why this is true, we must understand how legal licensure destroys any responsibility to the Laws of Nature and how legalism is opposed to life itself, by causing all things living to become merely legal words without soul.

Ever wondered why whole flocks of birds suddenly fall out of the sky?

How about when millions of fish suddenly wash up dead on the shore?

Beached whales and dolphin… Is it suicide? Is it Natural? Or is something sinister afoot?

As it turns out, these mass killings are being done on purpose by the very government that claims to be the legal protectorate of these “lower life-forms.” Not only is this mass culling considered perfectly legal and acceptable, but it is also publicly disclosed to a population that chooses to pretend its not happening, turning our heads away from such actions of government on our behalf. It’s really just business as usual.

Perhaps you have taken some only-in-America style comfort (or cognitive dissonance) in the fact that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was established long ago to protect our wild and marine life from the follies of man and the corporations we build. Perhaps you have always thought that these types of Federal agencies are set up with the best of intentions; to ensure that endangered species and other life on earth, including man, are safe from corporate and military pollutions, testing, and purposeful, knowing destruction. Perhaps you believe that these regulatory bodies would never betray the trust bequeathed in them by our President and Congress on behalf of the voting public as the protectorate of these species and the lands they inhabit…

But perhaps you should start to rethink your beliefs and opinions and replace them with the facts.

Bouvier’s Dictionary Of Law defined the “United States” as the following:

“5. The United States of America are a corporation endowed with the capacity to sue and be sued, to convey and receive property. 1 Marsh. Dec. 177, 181. But it is proper to observe that no suit can be brought against the United States without authority of law.”

–=–

So what happens when that which is “sovereign” is an unthinking, unfeeling corporation (body politic) charged militarily to purposefully and without conscious destroy life?

The inherent paradox of this problematic definition would sound something like this: You have no recourse against government (a limited liability corporation) because it makes its own laws, of which you must follow in order to sue it, and you can only sue it if it allows you to by its own laws and in its own courts. Individuals are not responsible for their own actions in a limited liability corporation, and so you must take on the whole corporation of the “United States” for the actions of even one bad apple… and the apple tree is certainly full of rotten fruit.

Bouvier’s Dictionary of Law is an important peice of American History. This dictionary was…

“A LAW DICTIONARY ADAPTED TO THE CONSTITUTION AND LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND OF THE SEVERAL STATES OF THE AMERICAN UNION. 1856 (Revised) – Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year one thousand eight hundred and thirty-nine, BY JOHN BOUVIER”

–=–

For the purposes of this essay, it is intimately important for the reader to grasp the importance and consequence of this fact; that the United States is seated in a municipal corporation, of which the 50 state governments (as commercial jurisdictions, but not as the territory of the actual States) are incorporated districts of that main corporation in Washington D.C. In order to gain power over these jurisdictions, each actual “several” State (People) gave up much of their sovereignty over much of their lands to this central holding corporation when, as territories, they became part of this corporation through “constituting” to the United States to become states, at which point they are no longer called as territories of the 50 united States of America (in congress assembled).

In the “enabling acts” of most State constitutions we see the evidence of this, where the original Territory must have agreed and ratified with the following to become a “state” of the  federation or “union” of the “United States”.

In Utah, it was agreed:

“Second. That the people inhabiting said proposed State do agree and declare that they forever disclaim all right and title to the unappropriated public lands lying within the boundaries thereof; and to all lands lying within said limits owned or held by any Indian or Indian tribes; and that until the title thereto shall have been extinguished by the United States, the same shall be and remain subject to the DISPOSITION of the United States…”

(Source) http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Utah_Enabling_Act,1894

–=–

In Colorado, it was similarly and uniformly agreed:

§ 4. Constitutional convention – requirements of constitution.

“…that said convention shall provide by an ordinance irrevocable without the consent of the United States and the people of said state… secondly, that the people inhabiting said territory do agree and declare that they forever disclaim all right and title to the unappropriated public lands lying within said territory, and that the same shall be and remain at the sole and entire disposition of the United States; …and that no taxes shall be imposed by the state on lands or property therein belonging to, or which may hereafter be purchased by the United States.”

(Source) http://www.michie.com/colorado/lpext.dll/coconst/9?fn=document-frame.htm&f=templates&2.0

–=–

And the same uniform act can be found in New Mexico as in most other state constitutions:

“Second. That the people inhabiting said proposed State do agree and declare that they forever disclaim all right and title to the unappropriated and ungranted public lands lying within the boundaries thereof and to all lands lying within said boundaries owned or held by any Indian or Indian tribes, the right or title to which shall have been acquired through or from the United States or any prior sovereignty, and that until the title of such Indian or Indian tribes shall have been extinguished the same shall be and remain subject to the disposition and under the absolute jurisdiction and control of the Congess of the United States…”

(Source) http://www.azleg.state.az.us/const/enabling.pdf

–=–

James Madison insisted:

“…the Western States neither would nor ought to submit to a union which degraded them from an equal rank with the other States”… Since the admission of Tennessee in 1796, Congress has included in each State’s act of admission a clause providing that the State enters the Union “on an equal footing with the original States in all respects whatever.” With the admission of Louisiana in 1812, the principle of equality was extended to States created out of territory purchased from a foreign power. By the Joint Resolution of December 29, 1845, Texas, then an independent Nation, “was admitted into the Union on an equal footing with the original States in all respects whatever.”

(Source) http://constitutions.vlex.com/vid/admission-states-union-united-295812

–=–

Interestingly, the Republic of Texas is the one exception, as it retained its unappropriated lands when it entered the union. However, on March 1, 1845, the act of this date annexing the Republic of Texas to the United States (5 Stat. 797) functioned as an equivalent to an Enabling Act authorizing formation of a State government and Admission thereafter; the annexation was formally accepted by the Republic of Texas on 4 July 1845.

From 5 Stat. 797:

Second, said state when admitted into the Union, after ceding to the United States all public edifices, fortifications, barracks, ports and harbors, navy and navy yards, docks, magazines and armaments, and all other means pertaining to the public defense, belonging to the said Republic of Texas, shall retain funds, debts, taxes and dues of every kind which may belong to, or be due and owing to the said Republic; and shall also retain all the vacant and unappropriated lands lying within its limits

(Source) https://www.tsl.state.tx.us/ref/abouttx/annexation/march1845.html

–=–

As time passed and the entirety of the territories within “America” became states (districts) of the United States Corporation via constitutional conventions and the compacts so created, The Federal government (United States Inc.) began a systematic and total land acquisition of these unappropriated and un-granted lands, with such altruistic titles as Land ManagementNational Parks, and Federally Protected Public Lands. And for those lands that it desired to control, which were already granted or appropriated either to private persons (citizens) or other interests, it began to utilize its so-called constitutional right of “eminent domain” through due process in its Judicial arm to rape that land from the common (public) people, whom were now in compact as residents in the state under this Federal Corporation. To be clear, the term “law of the land” means nothing more or less than “due process of law,” which is held by the courts of the United States. It is nothing more Romantic than this.

The point of this is to set the standard of care for these lands, meaning that their care and “disposition” is at the whim not of any individual people or whole people’s of any state, but by congress assembled in the “United States.” This centralized power over the very well-being of nature itself is the height of insanity. And for a corporation calling itself a government, where profits and commercial interests in interstate commerce is its main goal, what else can we expect than this most corrupt of “care” for our environments. Government cares only about its own fictions, its currencies and taxes, and its created corporations that by law must show profits to exist in appeasement of their shareholders. And anyone who has read my CAFR School artifices or seen my own documentary films (TheCorporationNation.com) knows that governments around the world are by far the major collective shareholders of all corporations. So why should we expect anything different that what has been shown to us in this documentary film? Why should we expect anything less than the rape of our wild lands, our skies, and oceans, lakes, and rivers?

Bouvier’s Dictionary Of Law defines the word “rape” as:

RAPEDivision of a country. In the English law, this is a district similar to that of a hundred; but oftentimes containing in it more hundreds than one.

–=–

This gives new meaning to the phrase “government is raping us,” now doesn’t it?

But why is this important? Why the history lesson?

Because what is the “public lands” and maritime jurisdiction of the United States cannot be protected by the actual States (People) nor their governments and politicians. What is ceded and unclaimed or unappropriated to Congress is under the full control of the corporate United States and its U.S. Code and international, commercial codes. In other words, the law of these lands fell into a completely commercial corporation calling itself as government, and its only purpose is to profit by ensuring the profit of other corporations.

RESIDENTPersons. A person coming into a place with intention to establish his domicil or permanent residence, and who in consequence actually remains there. Time is not so essential as the intent, executed by making or beginning an actual establishment, though it be abandoned in a longer, or shorter period.

PERSON – This word is applied to men, women and children, who are called natural personsIn law, man and person are not exactly-synonymous terms. Any human being is a man, whether he be a member of society or not, whatever may be the rank he holds, or whatever may be his age, sex, &c. A person is a man considered according to the rank he holds in society, with all the rights to which the place he holds entitles himand the duties which it imposes. 1 Bouv. Inst. n. 137. 2. It is also used to denote corporation which is an artificial person. 1 Bl. Com. 123; 4 Bing. 669; C. 33 Eng. C. L R. 488; Wooddes. Lect. 116; Bac. Us. 57; 1 Mod. 164. 3. But when the word “Persons” is spoken of in legislative acts, natural persons will be intendedunless something appears in the context to show that it applies to artificial persons (corporations). 1 Scam. R. 178.

–=–

We must comprehend that by being titled and given a legal, political status called as a “natural person,” we are no longer being considered as pure-blooded men (male or female). We are in legal attainder, a corruption of blood, from a legal view. And so our will and our wishes are only as powerful as that status allows us to be, which under a sovereign government is nothing at all! By causing all things in this world, living and non-living, to be legal named and titled in some person, place, or thing (noun) and therefore as only a fictional legal status, all of the Natural rights of that entity are taken away by that contractual relationship. Thus a whale is no longer a Natural consideration, but merely a commodity to be raped and dispossessed at the will of they who have patented those names and titles (statuses). And so congress and its licensed corporations in this legalistic escapism may pretend to be immune from the Laws of Nature and of the Natural Law, for their only dealings and laws are over fictions and the legal status of legally “natural” and “artificial” persons, places, and things.

When we think of the 14th amendment we thing of the word “persons” as meaning only citizenships (i.e. natural persons). But the 14th amendment was for all persons, including corporations, for “all persons,” not real men. In other words, for all statuses of subjects under the United States. And there is nothing of Nature in a legal, “natural” person any more that the word “all natural” on a food product means it actually grew in Nature. The legal term “natural” is not the same as the common term. To be legally natural or anything for that matter is to be a fictional creation not of Nature (God).

Many legislative acts have been passed over the decades and, through legal code and corruption, the United States has claimed not only the public, unclaimed territory of what is known as the municipal corporations of states, but also the mineral estates of these lands (which it grants to its own supported private corporations – i.e. artificial persons), water rights of all navigable and now non-navigable waters, and most imporatantly maritime jurisdiction over the oceans we fish and boat upon and the airspace we breath and fly within. In short, The Federal “United States” corporation has incrementally taken over the management and responsibility of just about everything you see through grants, federal funding, and infringing and encroaching federal laws. Where federal money lands and is consented to, so too do federal restrictions on the use of those monies. It is the will and law of the giver, not the receiver, that is followed.

In such a rogue corporation as our United States government, which in its “sovereignty” requires neither constitutional permission nor the common people’s acquiescence in its exploits against those lands, air, and seas, against nature, and against the commonalty of people ourselves, we can see the true callous disregard for all life on earth from within the United States Corporation’s own U.S. CODE, and from its own military functions and testing. After reading the following information, you’ll understand that these government agencies, as corporations (persons) not men, has no empathy or respect with regards to its self-proclaimed responsibility of dominion over our lands and seas.

The following information is painful and is equally if not more shameful than all of the wars and unlawful occupations by the United States combined.

Bouvier’s Dictionary Of Law defines the word Take:

TAKE – This is a technical expression which signifies to be entitled to; as, a devisee will take under the will. To take also signifies to seize, as to take and carry away.

TAKING – Criminal torts. The act of laying hold upon an article, with or without removing the same; a felonious taking is not sufficient without a carrying away, to constitute the crime of larceny. (q. v.) And when the taking has been legal, no subsequent act will make it a crime. 1 Moody, Cr. Cas. 160.

–=–

So what happens when this “taking” is the taking of life itself?

Again, an applicable translation of this would be that government agencies (corporations and the artificial persons that it employs) are entitled to willfully take or seize anything it wishes under the corporate protection of the United States, and they can do this without consequence because government makes the laws which make such an unlawful seizure and destruction against nature legal. Again, the people have no recourse, for they are subject to its will and law as well, the law of persons (legal status).

But in the modern U.S. government verbiage, the word “take” has been altered to refer to lifeforms as well, not just private or public property. Life on this planet (including “human life”) is considered nothing more than a mere public commodity to be tossed aside (taken) for research and development, and for “scientific purposes,” to be tested, modified, and killed without true cause, moral law, or empathy.

So let us take a look at just what it is that government considers is the “taking” of life to dredge up sand from the oceans, taking what is of Nature and crushing it utterly into man-made sand.

Take = “Harass, hunt, capture, kill or collect, or attempt to harass, hunt, capture, kill or collect.” — U.S. Department of Commerce – NOAA (NMFS) as defined under the MMPA

Take = “To harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or to attempt to engage in any such conduct.” — U.S. Department of Commerce – NOAA (NMFS) as defined under the ESA

Incidental Taking = “An unintentional, but not unexpected take.”

Potential Biological Removal (PBR) Level = Defined by the MMPA as the maximum number of animals, not including natural mortalities, that may be removed from a marine mammal stock while allowing that stock to reach or maintain its optimum sustainable population. The PBR level is the product of the following factors–

  • the minimum population estimate of the stock;
  • one-half the maximum theoretical or estimated net productivity rate of the stock at a small population size; and
  • a recovery factor of between 0.1 and 1.0.

Unmitigable Adverse Impact = “An impact resulting from the specified activity that–

  • is likely to reduce the availability of the species to a level insufficient for a harvest to meet subsistence needs by
    • causing marine mammals to abandon or avoid hunting areas;
    • directly displacing subsistence users; or,
    • placing physical barriers between the marine mammals and the subsistence users; AND
  • cannot be sufficiently mitigated by other measures to increase the availability of marine mammals to allow subsistence needs to be met.”

Enhancement permits = As defined in the MMPA, they are, “permits issued for the recovery of a species or stock where taking or importation–

  • is likely to contribute significantly to maintaining or increasing distribution or numbers necessary to ensure the survival or recovery of the species or stock; and
  • is consistent with any conservation plan adopted by the Secretary for the species or stock, or if there is no conservation or recovery plan in place, with the Secretary’s evaluation of action required to enhance the survival or recovery of the species or stock…”

–=–

These psychopaths have created a whole legal (anti-Nature) language to avoid ever referring to anything of Nature, of God’s Creation, if you will. For all things must be non-religiously considered (separation of church and state) in order for the immoral legal law to reign over the minds of men over the Laws and Reality of Nature.

This “taking” of life, as defined above, is responsible for untold deaths in the millions upon millions of “animal and marine life” around the world, and billions upon billions of life forms in the food chain of oceanic life. The government defines the extinguishment of sea life as a “taking.” This purely unemotional, immoral, un-empathetic, unnatural legal term can only be utilized by a defeated people, by paid mercenaries willing to carry out the orders of their president and all its executive agencies and heads. We are told to support the troops at any cost and despite their actions against life, against even our own well-being. I cannot do this, and neither should you. To be paid wages for prostituting ones self to the constituted authorities of a totally corrupt corporate government is not an honorable profession, and we should stop treating it as such. For it is us that allow these “soldiers” to be paid. It is our labor and our silence that allows both corporations and military testing to destroy as much “life” as the corporation sees fit and with license of Congressional agencies on our behalf.

In this disturbing letter from some of our more illustriously evil legislators written to NOAA and dated June 19th, 2009, including Senator Feinstein and Congressman Waxman, the following was transmitted:

“…In many regions, the Navy plans to increase the number  of its exercises or expand the areas in which they may occur, and virtually every coastal state will be affected.  Some exercises may occur in the nation’s most biologically sensitive marine habitats, including National Marine  Sanctuaries and breeding habitat for the endangered North Atlantic right whale. In all, the Navy anticipates more than 2.3 million TAKES (significant disruptions in marine mammal foraging, breeding, and other essential behaviors) per year, or 11.7 million TAKES over the course of a five-year permit…”

Link–> http://www.stopthecrime.net/info/0101.html

–=–

But don’t worry, these are only “takes” and not death and destruction of life, right? This is the evil of legal thought processes.

Now imagine being in the position to put your seal of congressional approval on that request! What else can you call this but the epitome of evil? Oh, that’s right, we call it the United States government and its military. My bad…

Instead of going into full detail about this murderous but perfectly legal “taking” of life in our oceans and on our lands and in our skies by a complicit government and its congress and legal agencies, here are a few links that will get you up to speed on the militaries use of sonar weapons testing, and how these legal “taking” laws allow everything from whales to starfish to be slaughtered merely to test these weapons without care. And this is the same taking that is allowed in sand dredging of the “public waterways” and seas.

“Bad News For Whales and Dolphins: Navy To Expand Sonar Testing” –NBC News

Link–> http://www.nbcnews.com/science/environment/bad-news-whales-dolphins-navy-expand-sonar-testing-f2D11749987

–=–

“Navy raises sonar impact on dolphins, whales dramatically” –NBC News

Link–> http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/05/11/11659008-navy-raises-sonar-impact-on-dolphins-whales-dramatically?lite

–=–

“Killing With Sound” –Huffington Post

Link–> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/brenda-peterson/killing-with-sound_b_2744864.html

–=–

“But Balcomb’s years of research unveiled a disturbing trend: Mature orcas were disappearing in the prime of their lives, and no one knew why. Then, when his equipment was blasted by a cacophony from a passing Navy vessel, Balcomb suspected he’d found at least one piece of the puzzle…” –LiveLeak

Link–> http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=1e2_1178254502

–=–

“Does Military Sonar Kill Marine Wildlife?” –Scientific American

Link–> http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/does-military-sonar-kill/

–=–

Under Sea Warfare: The official magazine of the U.S. submarine force

SMMTT – Submarine Multi-Mission Team Trainer

Link–> http://www.public.navy.mil/subfor/underseawarfaremagazine/Issues/Archives/issue_41/smmtt.html

Note: this is an underwater video game for the military. It’s power source is aquatic life. You pay for this, people!

–=–

Federal Register: The Daily Journal of the United States Government

Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities; Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to the San Francisco Ferry Terminal Expansion Project, South Basin Improvements Project”

Notice; Proposed Incidental Harassment Authorization; Request For Comments.

SUMMARY

NMFS has received a request from the San Francisco Bay Area Water Emergency Transportation Authority (WETA) for authorization to take marine mammals incidental to construction activities as part of a ferry terminal expansion and improvements project. Pursuant to the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), NMFS is requesting public comment on its proposal to issue an incidental harassment authorization (IHA) to WETA to incidentally take marine mammals, by Level B harassment only, during the specified activity.

Link–> https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2016/05/25/2016-12299/takes-of-marine-mammals-incidental-to-specified-activities-taking-marine-mammals-incidental-to-the

–=–

Now what good is a “Marine Mammal Protection Act” if at any time it can be overruled by unscrupulous government agents? We cannot be fooled by these types of supposedly protective “acts” anymore, for government’s main function is the protection of its licensed corporations for which it is also the majority shareholder of. These “acts” are only as good as the criminals who pass and regulate them. They protect only legal things, not Real ones.

This cannot continue, and not only for reasons political and personal, but for those essential to our own existence as a species and our responsibility under the Natural Law to protect that which cannot protect itself from our psychopathy. This is not something that can be left up to governments, it must happen because, after all, we are still men of God (in other words, we are of this Earth/Nature, not the fictional persons of some legal realm of nations)! We cannot continue to do the same thing and expect different results, the very definition of insanity, for this corruption doubles with each new set of voted-upon politicians (prostitutes).

We cannot fall any further, for what lies under that protective layer sand is surely a hell of our own making.

Now you know…

Please support this filmmaker in any way you can and recommend him to your favorite radio and TV hosts. Thank you.

.

–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Tuesday, June 14th, 2016

 

Advertisements

Global Warming Greenies And Sports Fans Suck !!!


The Global Warming hoax…

.

So what is carbon anyway?

Carbon is the fourth most abundant element in the universe by mass after hydrogen, helium, and oxygen. It is present in all known life forms including the human body. Carbon is the second most abundant element by mass, averaging about 18%, after oxygen (in the form of water – H2O).

.

Then, what is carbon dioxide (CO2)

Carbon dioxide is a benign, life giving molecule. This molecule – CO2 – is vital to all life on earth. It is exhaled by all living things and is even released through nocturnal emissions by plants and trees. Carbon and carbon dioxide are essential to all known living systems, and without it life as we know it could not and would not exist. It forms the bubbles in your soda, wine and beer. Standard air has 370 parts per million (PPM) of carbon dioxide of which approximately 93% comes from “natural sources” which are way beyond human control. Some of these sources include the decomposition of organic matter, exhaling (breathing) by living things, volcanic vents (which are by far the greatest atmospheric source), and natural methane gas. Thus, when it is said that a carbon tax is a tax on breathing, this is not far from the truth, although we exhale our share of supposed “carbon credit” by age 3. And because carbon is in methane gas, the carbon tax on breathing includes… cow farts.

.

O.K… so if carbon and CO2 are good for the planet, why are our leaders saying otherwise?

It has been said by those “crazy conspiracy theorists” for decades that the powers that be created “Ozone depletion” and the “Global Warming” schemes as a fear tactic, which could be used to control and tax not only the people of the United States, but the inhabitants of the entire world through the United Nations and its global governing bodies. Of course, as usual the theorists were right. It always takes some time, but the so-called theories of these well educated and quite excellent researchers (of which the elite, through the corporate controlled media portray as nuts, crazy, paranoid conspiracy theorists) almost always seem to be revealed over time as true. Why? Most of the time the facts, figures, and plans for these mass scams and hoaxes are written out in government documents and in elitist think-tanks like Agenda 21, PNAC, Operation Northwood’s, The Rand Corporation, and many other groups and papers which are unclassified, declassified, public record, or requisitioned through the Freedom of Information Act. In other words… not only do they write down their plans years before the carry them out, but they revel in the fact that most people never figure this out.

(RANT ALERT!!!   RANT ALERT!!!)

Instead, these gullible masses would rather watch a pigskin full of air be carried back and forth on 100 yards of fake grass and kicked between what I consider an easily attainable extra large set of metal posts by some of the most steroidal and mongoloid members of the human species (mentors and hero’s they are not). Or maybe they prefer to watch the “sport” in which the most un-athletic of men and women, dressed in cardigans, polo shirts, and dress slacks stroke a little white ball with a multitude of divots onto vast plots of well manicured land hoping to get it as close to a little hole with a flag in it as possible, while being shown advertisements for every type of automobile and wrist-watch that are just outside of their budget, followed by bank commercials offering loans at interest. And its players are somehow the hero’s of many a child, teenager, and adult – if only they would speak truth to power with the platform they have. Instead, they wear and use the products they endorse and reap huge advertising fortunes while shutting up about the real world. Imagine the good Tiger Woods could do for the world by just getting involved in politics. Imagine some of the support O.J. Simpson would have gotten if he had actually done something good with his fame and fortune.

But then, why do you think there is so much money in sports to begin with? Why do professional sports players make so much money anyway? Simply stated, the whole organization is fixed, and the players are paid to keep this dirty little secret. Think about it: Why is it that in a football game with only minutes or seconds on the clock, the losing team suddenly scores three touchdowns – not enough to win the game of course, but enough to almost tie the game? Professional sports are run by the betting industry, which as we all know… is run by the mob. When you bet on sports, you bet that one team will win, and by how many points (the point spread). Thus, the point spread must be narrowed to insure that the bets are covered, insuring the house always takes in more money than it pays. There is no randomness in these sports. They are run by the mob. How do I know this to be true? I was fortunate enough to have been told this at the tender age of twenty-two by a couple of extremely old, extremely drunk former baseball players and a retired official who were sitting at my blackjack table as I dealt them cards, across from the sports book at Harvey’s, So. Lake Tahoe. They were smashed! I asked questions, they had drunk and disorderly answers. They both said they wished they were in the game today, only for the outrageous amounts of money these guys make. And they explained the sports book and how it works and the mechanics involved. Since I wasn’t a baseball fan, I don’t know their names, and I have no other proof to back this experience up except for my word and hopefully your logic and reason. It was one of those once in a lifetime moments of enlightenment, which I’ll always cherish. It was my first trip down the rabbit-hole and into the world of truth and cover-ups.

What’s most interesting about this is that when I’ve tried to tell people about it, nobody believed me. Even though everyone knows about Don King’s boxing empire and the pre-paid falls his boxers take in that sport (for the purposes of covering the bets) not a one of the devoted sports fans I tell this to can believe what I say about their chosen sport and the blind loyalty they have to it. Some faith in the goodness and wholesomeness of the church of Monday night football has them in a stranglehold of thickheaded imperceptibility.

Even some professional wrestling fans still believe that the WWF is real…

Jesse Ventura, in describing the two party political system to Larry King in 2008 said,

“In pro wrestling, out in front of the people, we make it look like we all hate each other and want to beat the crap out of each other, and that’s how we get your money, [and get you to] come down and buy tickets. They’re the same thing. Out in front of the public and the cameras, they hate each other, are going to beat the crap out of each other, but behind the scenes they’re all going to dinner, cutting deals. And [they’re] doing what we did, too — laughing all the way to the bank. And that to me is what you have today, in today’s political world, with these two parties.”

And so, when men like Al Gore say that global warming is real, the masses (the sports fans) believe it is too, without checking the source of his information. The faith is so strong that it cannot be broken, regardless of the overwhelming proof and record low temperatures that have been sweeping the globe. Ice storms in Africa, the lowest temperatures of all time in almost all 50 states of the United States, record snowfall levels in the history of recorded measurements, and now the earliest snowfall in Austria ever recorded.

Believe what you want, but the facts don’t lie.

*** Now that was the champion of all segue’s! ***

Global warming as the theory of the man-made global destruction of the earth’s climate is simply not real, and has no basis for rational debate because there is no evidence to support it that hasn’t been debunked.

Global warming as an occurrence due to cyclical fluctuations of the solar conditions of the sun is a proven scientific fact. Just as its opposite, global cooling happens inversely once the cyclical sunspot activity goes dormant again.

The truth is that plants grow healthier and produce more fruit when in a carbon rich environment. And the abundance of carbon and CO2 is the reason that in our lifetime the climate has been so livable and so abundant with these crops. It is the near future, as a predicted cooling of the earth’s temperatures due to the lack of sunspot activity leading to a mini ice age that we should be worried about. And it won’t be the first. (See more info at: iceagenow.com)

.

Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
Wednesday, October 14, 2009

The Nobel Prize: An Award For Liers Like Al Gore


I was really mad when I was fooled (apparently like millions of others) into believing that global warming was a man-made event, because I simply watched a movie called, “An Inconvenient Truth”. Al Gores movie won such massive acclaim, an academy award, countless accolades, and the man even won a Nobel Prize!

A Nobel Prize… I was especially curious about this. The Nobel Prize is a very distinguished and coveted award, and it’s not at all easy to be its champion. Therefore, when I found out that almost all of the information, facts, and figures used in Al Gore’s ‘shock-u-mentary’ were either doctored, misinterpreted, misrepresented, falsified, junk science, or completely fabricated lies, I wondered at the qualification process in being awarded a prize from the Nobel Foundation.

And so, I decided to send an email to the Nobel Foundation.

I had two questions.

1)    How does the group decide who to elect and what are the research and verification criteria involved?

2)    If a winner is proven to be a hoax, or in Gore’s case, use junk science and false information in his glorious work, is the prize then withdrawn or retracted from the corrupt recipient in question?

The following is a transcript of my correspondence.

—Ω—

To: comments@nobelprize.org
Date: Wednesday, July 1, 2009, 7:51 PM

Hello,

I have two questions I would greatly appreciate an answer to for a school project:

1) Has there ever been a case where, after earning a Nobel Prize, the prize was withdrawn due to dishonesty or fraud in the earning of said prize?

2) How was this acknowledged, and what would be the process for this to take place. (i.e. petitions, court case, vote, etc…)

I thank you for your time and consideration.

—Ω—

From: Sofia Bryngelson via RT <comments@nobelprize.org>
Subject: [nobelprize.org #3414] Help with questions…
Date: Friday, July 3, 2009, 1:25 AM

Hello,

Thank you for your interest in the Nobel Prize.

No, it is not possible to revoke a Nobel Prize, according the the statues of the Nobel Foundation § 10:

No appeals may be made against the decision of a prize-awarding body with regard to the award of a prize.

Proposals received for the award of a prize, and investigations and opinions concerning the award of a prize, may not be divulged. Should divergent opinions have been expressed in connection with the decisionof a prize-awarding body concerning the award of a prize, this may not be included in the record or otherwise divulged.

A prize-awarding body may, however, after due consideration in each individual case, permit access to material which formed the basis for the evaluation and decision concerning a prize, for purposes of research in intellectual history. Such permission may not, however, be granted until at least 50 years have elapsed after the date on which the decision in question was made.


Yours sincerely,

Sofia Bryngelson
Marketing and Communications Assistant
Nobelprize.org

—Ω—

To: comments@nobelprize.org c/o Sofia Bryngelson
Friday, July 3, 2009 4:44 PM

Hello Mrs. Bryngelson, and thank you for your timely response.

In regards to your answers to my previous questions, may I interpret your response as meaning – The Nobel Prize organization, if and when confronted with overwhelming evidence, obvious visual proof, or blatantly plagiarized writings or lies in regards to the qualifications and merits in the earning and bestowing of a past Nobel Prize, would not reconsider, convene a board to reconsider, or even mention to the public that the prize awarded was in fact earned under false pretenses, not merited, plagiarized, or was based on half-truths and lies?

And, if this is the case, what could possibly be a logical, reasonable, moral, or fiduciary  explanation for such behavior from a most respected organization?

As an organization with such uncompromisingly high standards of fiduciary responsibility to the world, I would be extremely disheartened with this organization which I have held in such high esteem for as long as I can remember if the above statements are indeed true.

This being said, the Nobel Prize surely represents the body of work of a person or group, and not the person alone. Therefore, if the “work” is proven to be contaminated or false after the prize is bestowed, surely the Nobel Prize committee would strive to keep it’s name in good standing as the premier academic amalgamate of our time by denouncing an award given under false or malevolent pretenses?

Again, your response to these inquiries is welcomed and eagerly anticipated.

Thank you,

Clint Richardson… a concerned citizen of the United States.

—Ω—

I never received a response to this, but today I resent the email hoping to ruffle some feathers and to make this apparently corrupt and phony organization own up to its deceit and fraudulent support of men like Al Gore.

I’ll keep sending this, and I’d really like for all of you to ask the same questions by emailing the Nobel Prize Foundation. Ask if they support global government. Ask if they support eugenics. And ask what their stance on depopulation, sustainable development through Agenda 21, and everything else these elitists are perpetrating on us.

Good luck and good night.

Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)

Czars: Unconstitutional, Unelected, Unofficial, And Unwanted!


There has been a lot of talk about the appointing of and use of Czars in the current Obama administration. Quite frankly, I had no idea what the connotation of this word was, nor what the historical power of that title really meant throughout history and today.

And so, being the ever-curious soul that I am, I did a bit of research.

I’d like to share that with you now:

(Emphasis mine throughout!)

What is a Czar?

According to the 1984 Webster’s New World Dictionary, Second College Edition – the term Czar is defined as:

Czar:

  1. An emperor: title of any of the former emperors of Russia, and at various times, the sovereigns of other Slavic nations.
  2. Any person having great or unlimited power over others; autocrat

Czarism:

  1. The Russian government under the Czars.
  2. Absolute rule; despotism

Hmmm… I don’t know about you, but that doesn’t sound very good to me. It certainly doesn’t sound like a Democracy or a Republic, where leaders are voted upon before entering office. And I refuse to believe that America has fallen so far as to be so ignorant of the past that their jaws don’t drop at the mere mention of the appointment of multiple “Czars” into their government.

Since this was a hard cover traditional dictionary from 1984 (a fitting year for this information, if you ask me) I thought this might be a biased, older, or out of date description of the word used to describe the people who are now advising our president.

So, I checked the Internet.

Here’s what I found there…

I went to Wikipedia, a site I would never use as a source of accurate information, but one none the less that many people do, despite it’s ability to be changed by even the most moronic of its users. But I figure that at least this is the going public opinion of what a Czar might be. Never the less, after some fact-checking… here’s what it said:

Tzar or Czar (Bulgarian, Russian, Ukrainian, Serbian): Term with Bulgarian origins used to designate certain monarchs. The first ruler to adopt the title tsar was Simeon I of Bulgaria.

Originally, the title Czar (derived from Caesar) meant Emperor in the European medieval sense of the term, that is, a ruler who claims the same rank as a Roman emperor, with the approval of another emperor or a supreme ecclesiastical official (the Pope or the Ecumenical Patriarch).

Occasionally, the word could be used to designate other, non-Christian, supreme rulers. In Russia and Bulgaria the imperial connotations of the term were blurred with time and, by the 19th century, it had come to be viewed as an equivalent of King.

“Tsar” was the official title of the supreme ruler in the following states:

  • Bulgaria in 913–1018, in 1185–1422 and in 1908–1946
  • Serbia in 1346–1371
  • Russia from about 1547 until 1721 (replaced in 1721 by imperator, but remained in common usage until 1917).

Under the heading “Metaphorical Uses” Wiki-Pedia states:

Like many lofty titles, e.g. Mogul, Tsar or Czar has been used as a metaphor for positions of high authority, in English since 1866 (referring to U.S. President Andrew Johnson), with a connotation of dictatorial powers and style, fitting since “Autocrat” was an official title of the Russian Emperor (informally referred to as ‘the Tsar’). Similarly, Speaker of the House Thomas Brackett Reed was called “Czar Reed” for his dictatorial control of the House of Representatives in the 1880s and 1890s.

In the United States the title “czar” is a slang term for certain high-level civil servants, such as the “drug czar” for the director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy, “terrorism czar” for a Presidential advisor on terrorism policy, “cybersecurity czar” for the highest-ranking Department of Homeland Security official on computer security and information security policy, and “war czar” to oversee the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. More specifically, a czar refers to a sub-cabinet level advisor within the executive branch of the U.S. government.

Under the political term explanation page, WikiPedia states the following:

Rationale:

Advantages cited for the creation of czar type posts are the ability to go outside of formal channels and find creative solutions for ad hoc problems, the ability to involve a lot of government players in big issue decision-making, and the ability to get a huge bureaucracy moving in the right direction. Problems can occur with getting all the parties to work together and with managing competing power centers.

One explanation for use of the term is that while the American public rebels at terms like “king” and “dictator”, associating them with King George III or fascist figures of World War II, the term “czar” is foreign, distant, and exotic enough to be acceptable. And the fact that czar positions are often created in times of perceived public crisis makes the public eager to see a strong figure making hard decisions that the existing political structure is unable to do.[6] Another is that Americans of the era adopted exotic Asian words to denote those with great, and perhaps unchecked, power, with “mogul” and “tycoon” being other instances.

The increase in czar positions over time may be because as the size and role of the federal government has grown, so too has the difficulty of coordinating policy across multiple organizational jurisdictions. Indeed, czar positions sometimes become important enough that they become permanent executive offices, such as the Office of National Drug Control Policy or the United States Trade Representative.

Wow! So how many Czars do we have now?

Well, buckle your seatbelts… for in July of 2009, The Daily Citizen reported that:

“It has taken President Barack Obama less than eight months to do what imperial Russia could not do in 400 years.

“Taxpayers for Common Sense reports that: Obama has appointed 31 “czars.” That’s more than ruled Russia during its entire imperial history.


“Obama has appointed a California water czar, a Mideast peace czar and a Mideast policy czar, a pay czar (to determine how much the private sector should pay, not the government), a health care czar, an energy czar and a green jobs czar, a Sudan czar, a climate change czar and numerous others, with the promise of more to come. And, if you can’t keep track of all the czars, don’t worry. Obama has also appointed an information czar.

“… Few of these czars require any congressional approval, but Obama has given many of them power over cabinet-level officials who are subject to confirmation.

(Source: The Daily Citizen –  http://www.northwestgeorgia.com/opinion/local_story_189163602.html?keyword=topstory)

Steve Forbes is quoted while speaking about Czars:

“It underscores the inefficiency of government that you keep … having people, hoping that maybe they will get something done that the massive government bureaucracy cannot.”

(Source: “Questions Raised Over Influence of Obama ‘Czars'”. Fox News. July 13, 2009. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/07/13/questions-raised-influence-obama-czars/)

So who is paying these “Czars” salaries?

Why the taxpayers of course!

How much power do these Czars actually have?

Good question… As stated by the Daily Citizen above:

Few of these czars require any congressional approval, but Obama has given many of them power over cabinet-level officials who are subject to confirmation.

So much apparent power do these Czars have, that Rep. Jack Kingston [Republican-GA] introduced a bill – H.R. 3226: Czar Accountability and Reform (CZAR) Act of 2009 – on July 15, 2009. Apparently this bill is so important to the members of the House of Representatives that it currently has 116 co-sponsors, all of them Republican. The one co-sponsor that was a Democrat was withdrawn at some point. When the whole of the Republican Party, including my personal hero Ron Paul supports a bill, which would reign in the Democratic President and party, one should not take such legislation lightly. The same would be true in opposite party circumstances. See the contents of the bill here:

(http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-3226)

The main concern here, one that is generally lost on the American people, is that these Czars are appointed without Congressional or Senate approval by one person: the President Of The United States. This alone should be enough to warrant extreme caution about the man who is for all intents and purposes in charge of our country (or more correctly: the man who signs the legislation and corrupt laws in the stead of lobbyists and wealthy elite bankers and corporations who funded his campaign and are incrementally taking control of our country). For the appointment of these men and women, of whom many have considerably tarnished and controversial political, economic, populist, and global oriented views, is a violation of the governmental and constitutional values we once held so dear to our hearts.

President Obama continues to keep in place and head the advice of such Czars as Paul Holdren – the “science czar” who co-wrote the book Ecoscience – “which proposed and supported such ideals as “compulsory sterilization,” and the creation of a “Planetary Regime” that would oversee human population levels and control all natural resources as a means of protecting the planet.” (infowars.com). Strangely, these ideals were not brought to light in Holdren’s Senate confirmation hearings. Unfortunately, this begs the assumption that the Senate is equally complicate in the appointment and support of these Czars, whether they are approved or not.

In conclusion, Obama appears to be out of control! While the gullible masses who support him are still admonishing him as the Savior of America, his empty promises of “hope and change” continue to ring – like a false Liberty Bell, whose crack is ever-widening and is about to break in half, along with this now condemned and nearly broken country. These Czars are the specters of false prophets; ghouls who resemble the character portrayal of Worm-tongue from the Lord of the Rings trilogy. And I for one am sickened by the ill-boded direction our electorate has taken towards the support of these tyrannical and unconstitutional, unelected rulers.

Quite frankly, the words of a fictional but oh so relevant news anchor perhaps best suit the stance we should all be taking towards the president and these unelected psychopaths who advise him…

I’m mad as hell, and I’m not going to take it anymore!

.

Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
October 5, 2009

The Plague Of Belief – 9/11, Religion, Global Warming, And Other Lies We Must Talk About Reasonably


The Plague of Belief:

There is a plague that has taken hold of America the likes of which will surely be it’s undoing. It is not easy to comprehend, yet it affects every one of us, myself included. Intelligence is not a barrier, ignorance no safe haven. It is a system of unconscious, concentrated belief. One so radical and absorbing that to be caught in its invisible web is surely the most horrifyingly comfortable place imaginable. Proof, scientific fact, historical documentation, gut feelings, or the lack of any of these does not seem to allow our logical deductive reasoning to overcome our outrageous beliefs. And unfortunately, beliefs are historically the downfall of everything… except for the unbelievable.

One example of this prophetic belief can be seen when the average American citizen is presented with evidence that their government is completely corrupt, and obviously so. It is the idea that Americans are the good guys trying to bring democracy to the world (even though we are supposed to be a republic). How? By invading country after country, faking false-flag “terrorist” attacks and then claiming the right to liberate that country from the “terrorists” while systematically destroying the infrastructure and any construct of civilization in that country. Of course, nothing could be farther from the truth. In reality, the invasion and occupation of another country by America always takes place in order to either gain control over the natural resources of that region, or to gain control or replace the president or dictator of that country with an American friendly leader, a puppet dictator or a corporation who will sign over all resources and put that country into a virtually un-payable debt to America which inevitably throws the economy into hunger, starvation, unemployment, civil war, and despair. How many countries has the United States of America invaded or bombed in the last 100 years? Too many. America has troops and bases in more than 70% of the worlds countries, many of which the average American would not even be able to locate on a map.

Here is a list of countries as of June 30, 2007 with U.S. occupation (military presence) straight from the Department of Defense’s “Active Duty Military Personnel Strengths By Regional Area And By Country (309A)” list :

(Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, American Samoa, Angola, Antigua, Argentina, Armenia, Ascension Island, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belgium, Belize, Bermuda, Bolivia, Bosnia, Botswana, Brazil, Bulgaria, Burma, Burundi, Cambodia, Cameroon, Canada, Chad, Chile, China, Colombia, Congo, Costa Rica, Cote D’lvoire, Croatia, Cuba, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Diego Garcia, Djibouti, Dominican Republic, East Timor, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Eritrea, Estonia, Ethiopia, Fiji, Finland, France, Gabon, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Gibraltar, Greece, Greenland, Guam, Guatemala, Guinea, Guyana, Haiti, Herzegovina, Honduras, Hungary, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Iraq, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kosovo, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Laos, Latvia, Lebanon, Liberia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Macedonia, Madagascar, Malawi, Malaysia, Mali, Malta, Marshall Islands, Mauritania, Mexico, Moldova, Mongolia, Montenegro, Morocco, Mozambique, Nepal, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, North Korea, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Puerto Rico, Qatar, Romania, Russia, Rwanda, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Somalia, South Africa, South Korea, Sri Lanka, St. Helena, Sudan, Suriname, Sweden, Switzerland, Syria, Tajikistan, Tanzania, Thailand, Timor, Tobago, Togo, Trinidad, Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Uganda, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United States, Uruguay, U. S. Virgin Islands, Venezuela, Vietnam, Wake Island, Yemen, Zambia, and Zimbabwe)

And this is a conservative list!

Why do we have troops in so many countries? I honestly do not know. World economic domination and strategic launching points would be my first guess guess. What I do know is that this is a Libertarians’ (Separatists’) nightmare! It is a Constitutional atrocity. It is costing the taxpayers of America a fortune that is unprecedented in history. It is why Rome fell. In other words, our military has diplomatic relations with around 185 of the total 192 countries that exist around the world, and have bases in most. And it’s certainly no coincidence that all of these “independent states” or countries are members of the United Nations.

Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by rulers as useful.” -Seneca the Younger (c.4 BC – 65 AD) Roman philosopher

  1. Disclaimer: I believe God is a personal adventure, one in which the worship of, while in a group setting, is detrimental to the true nature of the relationship you may have with said supreme being. Whether your personal image of God is simply nature, a man-like being in space-time, an other-dimensional being, the Biblical portrayal of a strangely Caucasian looking Jew, or even something with a female persona, God is your personal God, and no two people can possibly see or realize Him – or Her – or It – in the same way (without a bit of brainwashing, anyway). The bible has been translated more times, in more languages and versions, and by more councils and kings than any other writing in history. To claim to know or even be able to comprehend God, is perhaps the most audacious claim made by men. To be controlled by this book by men who make this claim is paramount to the history of violence and murder in this world’s history. The correct answer on all things heavenly is simply: I do not know. But by all means, I encourage you to do good and seek truth in whatever you perceive as being in God’s name, as I do… because I do believe in evil, and the very (dark) evil men and false evangelists who will stop at nothing to deceive you and destroy your spiritual release. This writing was most definitely not meant for that purpose. As with the beauty and harshness of nature… truth is neither good nor evil, it is only the truth. I’ve heard it said that it doesn’t matter what you believe; only what the ones in power (they) believe.

Another prime example of this blind belief and perhaps top on the most controversial of debates is religion. It is not so much the belief in God as it is the belief in the organizations which take advantage of, exploit, and capitalize on what I consider to be the most illogical of all beliefs: the belief in Jesus Christ as God. These highly organized godly corporations take advantage of peoples naivety to bankroll billions of tax-exempt profits, while completely ignoring the constitutionally profound law of the “separation of church and state”. God and the religious institutions that exploit Him influence voters, pay contributions to political campaigns, interfere seemingly without bounds in the political process, and is even referenced on all of the denominations of currency you currently have in your possession. This would never be allowed in any other relevant sovereign government. If the Prime Minister of England were to claim to Parliament that he talked to God before making his decisions, and that God himself reciprocated with a glorious response (like President Bush), he would be expelled from his role of leader without hesitation and placed into the nearest mental institution.

To understand my contempt for this cultish business of exploitative thieves who use a mythical “Son of God” as their heavenly front man, one only has to view the historical and documented writings from almost all ancient civilizations predating the birth of Christ, which detail the multitude of gods who came before Jesus ever supposedly roamed the earth. It is written in history, predating 3,000 B.C. and continues through to the dawn of the age of Pisces – the birth of the most recent ‘Son of God’. But the same attributes have been recorded on temple walls, stone tablets, on parchments and in the minds of men for centuries before the supposed birth of Jesus Christ. For example: Horus, the sun god (sun of God) of the early Egyptians was born of the virgin Ices on December 25th under a bright star in the east. Three kings (stars in the sky) adored him upon his birth. He became a prodigal child teacher at age 12, and at the age of 30 was baptized by a figure know as Anup, at which time he began his own ministry. He had 12 disciples that he traveled about with performing miracles and healing the sick. He was known by such names as the Truth, the Light of the World, the Lamb of God, the Good Shepherd, and many other gestural names. After being betrayed by a figure known as Typhoon, Horus was crucified, placed in a tomb, was dead for three days, and was thus resurrected. (See Zeitgeist: the movie). Sound familiar? Well, these attributes of so-called messiahs permeate historical record, from almost all past civilizations. The most current of these solar messiahs is none other than Jesus Christ. Most important to this quest for proof, is that no historian other than the biblical storytellers has ever recorded anything about this man Jesus Christ. Surely a man who healed the sick and preformed such wondrous miracles would have been noticed and written about by others… most notably true historians. Even the holy cross is a Pagan spiritual symbol, an adaptation of the cross of the zodiac. Christmas and Easter represent the Equinoxes, or the change of seasons. Almost every Christian symbol used today was stolen or transformed from the nature and earth worshiping Pagans, and blatantly plagiarized to make easier the conversion of the heathen masses into the Christian belief. The proof is out there for anyone who wants to see it… not even our version of Santa Clause originated in America, though he is easier to believe in!

But that brings me back to the point of this rant, the plague of belief. If a figure named Jesus Christ, who was never actually recorded in human historical writings other than in the fictitious parables and stories of a book called “The Bible”, can be believed by so many to be the epitome of God incarnate with no proof, no birth certificate, no historical records, no eye witnesses (the New Testament was written many years after his death), no relatives, no offspring, no father or siblings, no pets, no writings, no grave, not anything tangible as proof of the human part of his existence, how then are we as a people ever to overcome this plague of which I speak? Faith is and always will be the tool of tyranny. Nothing can be more truly stated.

Moving on… there is extremely damning evidence that the “terrorist attacks” of September 11, 2001 were in fact a controlled demolition and an ‘inside job’. Thermite, a chemically based incendiary used in controlled demolitions, has been found in the now solid molten metal, which pooled under the area labeled ground zero for months after the “attack”. The people who are trying to expose this are called crazy, or “conspiracy theorists”. Yet all they want is a new, non-governmental and certainly not federal, unbiased independent investigation into the new proof and evidence at hand, which is completely contrary to the official story… and then for the real people responsible to be held accountable. Nothing more! Does that sound crazy? Yet they cannot get their wish due to the fact that the majority of American citizens still believe that their own government is not capable of such evil acts of murder and treason. This is faith. Despite Vietnam, and despite the unclassified documents available for anyone who wishes to see them which show our government has been involved in such things as human rights violations, war crimes, and other pure evil acts such as torture, eugenics, war, the great depression, the systematic collapse of the U.S. banking system, the confiscation of gold bullion from the public (yes, Fort Knox is empty), the acceptance of an international cartel of private bankers to control our money with no congressional oversight called the Federal Reserve, the illegal and unconstitutional unapportioned federal income tax, the systematic dumbing down and virtual upheaval of the public school system, depleted uranium radiation and nuclear testing on its own unwitting citizens and soldiers and on many a foreign and third world populous, refusal of medical care to it’s veterans and currently deployed and injured soldiers, the overthrow of at least 50 governments around the world since 1920, over 30 of which were bombed, the complicit involvement in the murder of over 200 million human beings in the last century, etc, etc, etc… Why wouldn’t anyone believe our government is capable of the most terrible things you or I can possibly imagine? Yet the church tells us to obey the law of the land and give up our 2nd amendment rights if that’s what the government asks.

Belief… It is the most detrimental sickness ever to plague humankind. No matter how much proof I can present, no matter how ridiculous I can make your belief sound, you will still believe! When I present proof that almost every aspect of the Holy Bible is plagiarized from past cults and religions, you cry heresy because that’s what you are told to do, instead of engaging in intelligent debate. And you believe it’s right. When I ask for evidence, your one irrefutable piece of proof is your faith (belief). Faith in God or faith in Government… I am not sure which disgusts me more. God will provide, the government will provide… Jesus will save you, the government will save you. I believe this blind faith is the single most destructive plague ever to befall the human populous. And no cure seems to be in sight. To call this the enlightened age is an affront to the concept of enlightenment. And even worse, this belief system is managed with striking precision through the corporately owned media. It is broadcast 24/7 into your home, into your car, at work, through the intercom at the grocery store, and through every magazine and newspaper you read. By them… They control you.

Oooooooooooo. Scary.

They… Who are ‘they’ anyway? Are they government officials? The fabulously wealthy owners of mass media? The royalty from around the world? The private bankers who own the Federal Reserve and central banks across the globe? Or are these elite autocrats all the same people? Rupert Murdoch, the owner of Fox and News Corp, also owns over 100 different news publications and media outlets around the world, from magazines and newspapers to television and movie production companies. ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, and even Public Television stations are owned and controlled by a select few corporations. A presidentially appointed mobster heads PBS, making it a censored propaganda machine for the people who believe in the religion of being “Green”. Clear Chanel, Viacom, Time Warner… these companies are all owned and operated by a round table of businessmen and international bankers who sit on each other’s board of directors and decide what it is that you should hear and see… their brand of news and world events. When 6 companies own at least 80% of all media outlets, you should realize that a conflict of interest and a grand conspiracy is afoot. And all of these companies have stakes in the weapons, pharmaceutical, energy, oil, and food production industries. War is big, big, big business and is extremely profitable! Thus, the goal of the war in the Middle East is not to win, not that I could tell you what we would be winning! The goal, as it was in Vietnam, is to sustain the fighting and the occupation for as long as possible at the expense of human life, in order to grab massive profits from the conditions of war. It is highly treasonous, unconstitutional, and horrifically profitable.

I used to believe that man was indeed responsible for “global warming”, what I believed was a relatively new concept stating that the release of greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere was responsible for the undermining of the fragile stratospheric shield which keeps Earth’s temperatures stable and protects the fragile ecosystem inside its life-sustaining bubble. For a long time this made perfect sense, what with the atrocious pollution and waste caused by the human race. Though I never saw any proof that this was the case. I just took it for granted that these people knew what they were talking about and that they had the best interests of humankind in their hearts. Why did I believe this? I don’t know. I had nothing backing up this claim or their claim of love for humanity, except for their constant broadcasting of it. For the longest time the big corporations, businessmen, news-castors, and government officials cast doubt and reason on the fact that global warming was not man-made, that it was not proven, and that in fact the phenomenon didn’t actually exist at all. And they said if it was happening, it was because of numerous natural causes, from crashing ocean waves to cow farts. Of course this seemed like a ridiculous concept to me. I thought they were just trying to protect their ability by law to dump toxic waste and pollutants into the water, ground, and air in which we breathe. I had even heard the preposterous claim by some that global warming was a hoax perpetrated on the people of the earth in order to usher in a world government, which would collect a carbon tax – a tax on the carbon emissions of everything and everyone on the planet. This was ridiculous, right?

And then something strange and miraculous happened: Rupert Murdoch, in a sudden unheard of change of heart, proclaimed loudly that he was wrong. ‘Global warming is real’, he said, ‘and it is all mankind’s fault!’ He referred to his children and his concern for their future. Well let me tell you, this was the equivalent of Gabriel’s’ trumpet proclaiming the apocalypse to me… instead of reinforcing my belief in global warming, it shook my blind faith in the unequivocal guilt of mankind. At this point, I decided I had better really look into this thing. After all, a guy like this doesn’t just suddenly turn on his constituents and big business partners. There had to be something ominous behind this horrifying admission. This was like the head of the mob suddenly turning on his minions and ratting them out. No way, Jose! I was confused. There was something more to this for sure… and I wanted to know what it was.

And then, bang! Al Gore came out with his Inconvenient Truth, and I was emotionally blind-sided. With his well-articulated so-called facts and figures, he threw me right back into the abyss. I recommended it to everyone I knew, and I even said it was “the most relevant and important movie in history.” Ugh! I stayed in this righteous state of mind for many months, with no doubt in my mind that everything this man had said was the truth. I didn’t need to check his facts. I was emotionally driven to spread the word as if I were a Christian trying to spread the gospel to the retched unsaved. I would get extremely upset at anyone who tried to controvert my pompous opinion of what the facts were. After all, Al gore is a good man, right? He was vice-president! Why would he lie? What possible motive could he have to deceive the world’s population? And those poor, poor stranded polar bears…

Soon, as it always does for me, the overwhelming irrational and emotional conviction towards this movie’s credibility slipped away, and I returned to my rational search for the truth. Though I did not intend to find the proof that this was all a lie, it found me as soon as I re-opened my eyes, and the logically thinking right side of my brain began to rule its emotional nemeses. It turned out that scientists around the world had long been studying the sun’s impact on Earth’s temperatures. It seems that the sun, a massive ball of extremely volatile gaseous heat, was extremely unstable… yet strangely predictable. You see in 2001, as it had so many times before in its unthinkably ancient existence, the sun reached what is called it’s solar maximum. This means in layman’s terms, that the sun was at it’s hottest point in a continuous cycle of heating and cooling; the middle of a hot cycle in fact. This cycle is measured by keeping track of the sun’s sunspots: huge eruptions on the star’s surface. These in turn are what make the solar system, including Earth, hotter or colder in a given cycle. Was our planet getting hotter? Yes. Were Mars and Venus getting hotter? Yes. Wait a minute… how could man-made global warming be affecting the temperatures of the rest of the planets out there? Why, at the same time our ice caps were melting, were those of the other planets melting as well? Surely the power of man and our pollution was not that far reaching! Then the bombshell fell: California representative Henry Waxman, the most sinisterly gruesome looking man I have ever laid eyes upon, introduced a new bill called H.R. 2454: American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009. This bill was fast tracked through committee and quite swiftly approved by the House of Representatives despite an almost total lack of support by the people and districts they are supposedly representing. This was it… a global tax on carbon emissions in the form of a cap and trade system. Those supposedly nutty carbon tax conspiracy guys were right all along. Now it all came together in my head. It was indeed all a lie. Global warming is a nefarious hoax.

It came out not long ago that the captivating picture in Al Gore’s movie of the polar bears stranded helplessly, waiting for their impending death on what remained of the small melting icebergs in the middle of the Arctic ocean, was actually just part of a larger picture. No, I mean literally! It was edited, cropped and Photo-shopped. The large mass of land that was actually less than a mile from these icy perches was cut out of the picture, for the purposes of a purely emotional response. The bears could have easily taken a leisurely swim to get back to shore. In fact, after reading some real science, Polar bear populations have been rising for many years; from 5,000 to well over 25,000 since real conservation had been put into place. Even more insulting was the fact that of those Polar Bear populations in trouble, most were suffering due to an increase of ice and lower temperatures affecting their habitats. And then I discovered the golden egg, the big secret that was no secret at all. All one had to do was look. Al Gore, it turned out, had helped fund and start a carbon credit trading company called ‘Generation Investment Management’ about two years before his famed, Oscar winning, Nobel Peace Prize winning documentary. This asshole actually buys his own carbon credits from himself. It’s almost like buying stock in your own company.

Other facts came out as well, such as times in history when carbon measurements in the air were 15 times higher than that of Al Gores figures of what they are today. It quickly became obvious to me that this was perhaps one of the best-laid propaganda schemes since the days of Hitler, if those days ever really ended. And now, in September of 2009, the sun is in the middle of it’s solar minimum, thus far having 198 (or 79%) sunspot-free days. The sunspots were all but gone for 2008 as well, as there were no sunspots observed on 266 of the year’s 366 days (73%). 2008 was the most sunspot-free year in the last half century, since the space age began. In fact, the last time the sun went this long without solar flares and spot activity was when the earth went through a mini ice age in the 16th and 17th centuries, when little or no sunspot activity was taking place. (See the NASA sunspot charts here: http://spaceweather.com)

And now, as the lack of heat is finally reaching the earth and its fellow orbiting planets from its long travel through the solar system, it seems global warming is going away. The ice shelves actually gained ice for the last few years, and not only the ones on earth! There were suddenly highly irregular ice and snowstorms in Kenya and in parts of the hot South African desert in 2008. It has been the coolest, mildest couple of summers in many years. In fact, so many record snowfall and cold temperature records were set in the winter of 2008/2009 that it was hard to keep track (Iceagenow.com does a very good job though). And now, to my amusement and chagrin, I have started to hear the most insultingly ridiculous propaganda to date: that global cooling is actually man-made! And the new catch-phrase is “Climate change”, which is of course caused by us as well.

Now, please don’t construe any of this to mean that myself or anyone in the scientific or rationally thinking fact-based community doesn’t recognize that there is truly a life-threatening problem with irresponsible human consumption and pollution on a global scale. In fact, I am more worried about this than most, because I know the truth. It is obvious that these careless traits of a population gone rogue against it’s environment and it’s very connection to nature are slowly destroying parts of our life sustaining environment. This is absolutely provable, and it never will be in question by any rational thinking man or woman. But do not be fooled by a brilliant but false global condition invented for the sole purpose of taxing you for even the air you breath, or more accurately, exhale. If these CEO’s and politicians actually believed in what they are purporting as fact, and that it would soon lead to virtually the end of civilization and indeed mankind, then we would all be driving solar powered cars by next year. Our cities’ power grids would immediately be replaced with renewable alternatives like wind and solar. Profits would become insignificant, overshadowed by the real threat of life itself literally ceasing to be, making the dollar truly worthless. The dead cannot consume. Quality would be replaced with disposable quantity again. And the toxic companies who are the main polluters of this earth would immediately cease their dirty practices or be immediately shut down. Who in their right mind would choose the almighty dollar over life itself? It would be a paradox, leaving nobody left to spend or consume. Global warming and cooling are caused by the roughly 7-year solar minimums and maximums (heating and cooling) of the sun. Don’t believe the hype or the made up crises’, which are meant to distract you from reality: that global warming just isn’t real. Do your own research and strive for the truth! Just make sure that the United Nations and the Federal Government propaganda machine don’t fund the research you use.

On a different note… The Holy Grail has been discovered: it’s the TV. Television broadcasts are perhaps the most debilitating weapon of disinformation and distraction ever conceived. Consumer oriented advertising and fictional realities are thrust into the viewers mind with a highly calibrated flicker rate, placing them in a trancelike state. Both visual and audible subliminal advertising force themselves into your brain, making you buy products you don’t need and actually ask your doctor for medications to recently invented diseases, the side effects of which usually amount to more illness and even suicidal thoughts or death. And now we see new medications to treat the side effects of the others! At what point do you stop and question this madness? When did news become entertainment instead of a source for needed unbiased and factual community, national, and international information? Guesswork, opinion, and commentary are now the order of the day. Just analyze your next conversation! How much of what you say from your ideas to your beliefs, is what you hear or read from the corporate owned media? Why do you think you get upset or even mad without understanding why, when anyone talks bad about your ethnic president or anything else you believe to be true, but have no evidence or proof of? At what point will the American people realize that after all, they do not live in a free country: that they are actually one of the most censored, restricted, biased, brain-washed, policed, imprisoned, and uneducated civilizations per capita on earth? The facts and figures are out there for everyone to see. But how do we make the people see? How do we break through the suffocating system of belief that destroys the average persons’ logic and intellect? How can you still believe that the U.S.A. is #1, that we are a free country, or even that we are the good guys?

Don’t believe any of this? I realize there is a lack of some references for some material I’ve presented in this rant. This is because I know that writing in a few references will not make you believe, or even go check these facts. So… I challenge you to watch the following movies and visit the following websites. Then, go and check any of these facts on your own. Just stay away from corporate owned and sponsored sources! Then and only then can you make an educated analysis for yourself. And in a country whose education level has dropped to nearly 3rd world status, with almost 50% illiteracy, we all better start self-educating ourselves… and soon.

Movies to watch (on Youtube or Google Video):


Zeitgeist (2 movies) – www.ZeitgeistTheMovie.com

America: Freedom to Fascism
Loose Change: The Final Cut
The Money Masters
The Fluoride Deception

Alex Jones Films (19 total @ Prisonplanet.com or Google Video)

Endgame
The Obama Deception
Terror Storm
Truth Rising
Police State 1,2,3

Websites:

Infowars.com
Prisonplanet.com
WhatReallyHappened.com
SteveQuayle.com
IceAgeNow.com

-Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
September 19, 2009